text stringlengths 1 29.3k ⌀ | label float64 0 1 |
|---|---|
Try debating on the talk page, first. | 0 |
is a form of guaranteed or minimum income. It simply is not the same as basic income. There is some content improvement on this page. The arguments section is better than the BIG page, and the clarity for why the 2 are different is better made. | 0 |
"
Happy Birthday!
Hey, . Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! " | 0 |
^_^ This is my cousin, this is my cousin, muwahahaha!!! | 0 |
WP:NFCC#9
{{Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.. I will be quite blunt, though. If there are any more examples of you knowingly violating the NFCC#9 policy and/or any more violations of civility such as those given at the WP:ANI discussion you will be blocked. Black Kite (t) (c) | 0 |
"
Your welcome. By ""business as usual"" though, I did mean the vandalism will continue. As I've said, edits that I and other users make will keep getting reverted. So unfortunately I cannot do anything but complain about it while two users have essentially monopolized editing rights to these articles." | 0 |
You removed an edit on: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mark_Henry&action;=history
I don't understand. The link has a new record... The record he held is broken. 89.100.20.87 | 0 |
"
I don't know about the authors, although you seem to have knowledge about them you might wish to share. As for ""dodgy journal"", is it WP:MEDRS compliant? Yes/no? DrChrissy (talk) " | 0 |
not to be rude, But largeprimenumbers is not a valid source, and this article is a pack of lies thanks to that. | 0 |
"
Strongly Oppose merger Articles like ""Obama logo"" exist so that this one doesn't become horrendously long and difficult to organize. Also, the logo was distinctive, and became very well-known in a way that hadn't quite occurred before in U.S. presidential politics... " | 0 |
Let's quote what User:Ew actually said in the 2007 move debate:
Architecture in Italy, 1400-1500 by Ludwig H. Heydenreich, Yale University Press; Second Revised edition, 1996, ISBN 0-300-06467-5, p.74, 80, 101, 183 (index) & 184 (index):
...by Giorgio da Sebenico, whose hand...
...with Giorgio da Sebenico...
...as important as Giorgio Orsini da Sebenico and...
Giorgio da Sebenico...
Orsini, Giorgio, see Giorgio da Sebenico.
- Now go and read WP:COMMONNAME. Is this you again Giovanni? Long time, no see! | 0 |
"
A couple of points (i) as a company employee you should not be making any changes: please read WP:COI (ii) you say the entry contains ""inaccuracies and one of the items discussed is incomplete and misleading"". If it contains inaccuracies or is misleading it would be very helpful if you would kindly specify the inaccuracies or matters which mislead here - prima facie the article is properly sourced and generally properly sourced material wins. If the article is incomplete then that is not a problem: please specify the missing text (and an independent source as required by WP:SOURCE and we can easily add it). Thanks. " | 0 |
"
Harassment?
Someone comes over to my talk page and baits me with a series of insulting messages. If I respond, I am accused of ""harassement""? What a joke. " | 0 |
"
He is a disruptive editor, who uses talk pages as forums to disparage ideologies with which he disagrees. I believe in at least one of his incarnations, he has made NPOV-violating edits to Lifetime Channel, just off the top of my head. He makes constant attacks on living persons and other editors, and is generally a disruptive editor who contributes nothing to this project but vitriol (unlike many of our more collegial conservative editors); and has a bad case of WP:IDONTHEARYOU. | Talk " | 0 |
, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
LOL talk-email 06:57 | 0 |
Just been cursing again? | 0 |
Link from cracked.com
This page has been linked to from cracked.com. This sometimes results in some minor vandalism, so please keep a watch on the page for the next week or so. | 0 |
"
Replied on editor's talk page. chat " | 0 |
User:TenOfAllTrades was the only admin I could find who responded to my request to remove the sock puppet tags placed under my name on article talk pages. | 0 |
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Fairfield Ludlowe High School, you will be blocked from editing. — Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings. | 0 |
Unfortunately, whenever a religious subject is addressed, invariably passion will stir; it is unavoidable. I suppose without passion there’d be no religion. But there is passion, and there is religion, too. This passion is usually manifest as liberal, moderate or extremism. On a religious subject, all these perspectives deserve and need an objective presentation because they are all part of any religious community. But, in the end, reputable, objective and verifiable information should take precedent in any encyclopedic entry, regardless of the subject. I invite that you continue reviewing the article. | 0 |
I'm sorry, but I think that placing it in the older categories is an incentive for editors such as Mono to get their act together. I'm sorry if I've messed up anything. I'll remember to tag it as April 2010. Thanks for letting me know! | 0 |
i will work on this somemore over the next couple of days. Unlike some people, I don't sit on Wikipedia all day long. lol | 0 |
" 2014 (UTC)
Nice to meet you. Thanks for your request. I sent you an email asking to talk because I wanted some more information. (talk) 19:18, 11 September" | 0 |
"
It's truly disturbing that such a slimy, disingenguous troll is allowed free rein here without sanction and the apparent support of the administrative section. You KNOW that Freeman was a far greater expert on Samoa, as he is universally described by the secondary sources. But you are looking for any tenuous excuse to belittle his authority because you are so transparently biased and dishonest. Yes, his dissertation was on Borneo, does that preclude him from being an expert in anything else? As you KNOW, it doesn't. Boas' dissertation was on the color of water, should I write ""Franz Boas, whose own research was on the color of water"" everytime he is introduced in an anthropological dispute to discredit him? PLEASE STOP WASTING MY TIME WITH LAME SOPHISTRY, BIAS AND DISHONESTY. Thank you. " | 0 |
Simply Wrong
In regards to the changes made by Cernica. The thought that you are trying to insert (mainstream scientists disagree with most of his theories and methods)is allready addressed in a neutral fashion at the end of the paragraph. The sentence you keep changing is a seperate and different statement. While the adjective offbeat in the text 'a propounder of theories on astronomical topics that are considered offbeat by many mainstream astronomers' can be read as referring to topics or theories, it makes more sense to refer there to theories and later in the paragraph to the pseudo-scientific allegations, lest the intro paragraph become POV in regards to the 'wrongness' of his theories. And making statements (or implications - which your added text definitely does) that he is wrong is definitely not in line with a neutral point of view. | 0 |
"
Policy: ""blocks will not usually be allowed to become a source of conflict; rather, consensus will be sought, by means of a fair and objective examination of the matter and of any policies alleged to have been breached.""
'''" | 0 |
"
I may be backing off also, as it appears that FeloniousMonk and his buddies may attempt to ban me for trying to bring some balance to the J. Wells biography. Did you notice that FeloniousMonk has changed the article again with the latest piece of dirt he found on Wells? He discovered that ""the leading AIDS denial proponent and Wells share the same publisher, Regnery Press""! " | 0 |
Jumping the Homeless
Could Cartman jumping the homeless be a reference to the term Jumping the Shark? I mean the episode wasn't that good, but it wasn't that well thought out or anything. | 0 |
Which one from the above is my own synthesis? | 0 |
Whalley Range
Why don't you add the info yourself ? Either to the education section, or anywhere you think the more general info might fit - as longa s it's sourced and fits the WP rules, you're more than welcome. Don't wait for others, DIY ! 86.12.129.2 | 0 |
You're right, that should be mentioned. Thanks, now fixed. | 0 |
thank you for editing all neccesary edits on the black wall street records page, much appreciated | 0 |
When will my Block be over/Please give me a more specific reason why I was Blocked?
Leave Me a message here | 0 |
Hmm
You missed some. 88.104.33.134 | 0 |
This article is about the second temple, Solomons is the first one. And there is no archaelogicale evidence for even their existence, not just for the intricate details described in the article. If you disagree, add some reliable sources.90.179.235.249 | 0 |
By the way, why did you restore this sentence? The previous sentence already says the aircraft crashed into a house, so repeating it would simply be redundant. | 0 |
Ah, well, yeah, I do see where you're coming from. Regarding mine; I've used a website for most of my knowledge as to what to do with him, and it suggested that they won't 'stop' growing because of the size of their cage or environment, but mine seems to have just stopped growing (Aside from the aforementioned tail). What confuses me the most is I happened to get about... eight juveniles from someone a while back, they had hundreds or so... Anyway, when I had been looking over them at first, one was nearly black in color. This is the only one of the eight that actually survived, the rest managed to escape the cage and crawl into corners and die overnight or so. He had... I's say half a tail when we got him, but it's been growing back and is near the original length, I'd guess (As it managed to somehow grow back parallel to his body... But now it's at a near 90-degree angle to the rest of his tail.), but the tip's rounded. I guess I have three questions, then, since you see to be quite knowledgeable on the subject: Why did he stop growing, why was he black (then turn green again later on), and what can I do to fix his tail? 10:22, 18 May 2007 | 0 |
"
Thx. There are more of these pages that should probably be deleted. Both variants of pages were created back in February: . I don't see the pattern. Was it the ""jump the queue link""? " | 0 |
"
I wonder about the listing of celebrities as ""assassinations"" and ""deaths.""
For example, why is John Lennon listed as not assassinated, while John Paul 1 is listed as assassinated? Does ""assassinated"" not mean ""killed by homocide while famous?""" | 0 |
"
Can you provide a source that states that the winners received moonmen? Because I checked the Official Rules link you provided and the ""Grand Prize"" section mentions nothing about a moonman, only promo spots and exposure on MTV2. The Pepsi Rock Band Video category's official rules, on the other hand, do explicitly mention the moonmen: ""GRAND PRIZE: One (1) Grand Prize will be awarded to each registered Band Member (Entrant and up to nine (9) registered Band Members) of the Grand Prize Winning Video consisting of a trip to the 2009 MTV Video Music Awards and receipt of a MTV VMA Moonman statue (the ""Grand Prize"")."" . A source proving that the winners get a moonman should effectively prove this was a category and not just a contest. " | 0 |
"
About biased articles
I'm not sure if it's approariate to point out an AfD discussion to you, when you haven't previously been involved (is it?), but here seems to be another pretty bad case of WP:SYNTH: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Communist_genocide. Taking a look at the sources used in the article, I have found absolutely nothing to confirm that ""communist genocide"" is a real term or concept, not to mention a notable concept enough for its own article. We could rename it to ""Genocide commited by communist governments"", but even then it seems too much like an advocating POV article and original synthesis. All the material is surely already present in the different genocide articles, so there doesn't seem to be any need for this kind of article. It seems pretty shocking if this kind of article is allowed to stay. " | 0 |
"
A kitten for you!
we have the same name
" | 0 |
The way *I* read the tvguide.com link, it's saying that his sister Cheryl is his BFF. | 0 |
That's not vandalization, I was trying to find out what his problem was. He came here and posted, so I didn't know of said user until he made a fool of himself. That is true and look at the history of this page for the proof. 71.72.172.177 | 0 |
"
Since you're already at it..
Could you help me to address San Isidro College, which has been tagged for speedy deletion. Author is lifting text right off the internet. CSD template gives further information. (Talk) " | 0 |
You couldn't possibly be more wrong. This will show that you're clueless regarding the practice squad. | 0 |
kerch** Counter-terrorists win. Thank you. | 0 |
. he has ignored my numerous suggestion to WP:DR, and insists that his endless reverting and edit warring are valid even though many editors do not think so | 0 |
I think that removed section contains relevant information that should not be deleted wholesale. It's research/writings that are directly on point. Whether a user agrees with it or can find fault with it is a separate issue. (talk) | 0 |
- I think you've got it covered. Someone else might disagree, but why don't you resubmit, and I'll move it to the mainspace. Nice job, good effort and follow-through. | 0 |
"
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Chhina. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Space Ace " | 0 |
Your website
After looking at the HTML source for http://www.philippwesche.org/2004/profile.html I conclude that my inability to view your website with high Internet explorer security settings is due to something your ISP is doing before my browser really gets to your actual web page. I only have trouble when I put http://www.philippwesche.org in the address bar. If I put http://www.philippwesche.org/2004/profile.html in the address bar everyting is fine.
Best wishes. | 0 |
"
Cleanup Tag
The page seems to follow the same set up as the other Simpsons Halloween pages. What on the page needs cleaned up?
Unfortunatly, as with a great many articles about television shows, it is saddled with a ""trivia"", ""cultural reference"", or ""quotes"" section; all of which are very unencyclopedic, magnets for spam and cruft, and tend to turn into lists which is a poor way to lay out an article. Please see: WP:Trivia, WP:NOT,and WP:AVTRIV. Please stop by the Trivia Cleanup Project at WP:WPTCU, if you would like to help out. Cheers. " | 0 |
Wow so much for wating until April 08 the JTWCs Report for the 2006 (2005/2006) Season is already up on the Archive page | 0 |
Thanks POD. Maybe there is hope that you will return to the light. | 0 |
I am certain you intended these comments for someone else. — Carl ( · talk) | 0 |
"
Introduction
The introduction ""Rigveda, a tatpurush compound of etc...."" appears vague. Its as though a knowledgeable audience is being addressed. What, whose, when, where etc. are addressed quite later in the introduction. Are such kind of introductions in fashion or what ? I propose to change it to a more conventional one like the one for Avesta.
how is it vague? Do you mean, overly specific? This is the brief bracket explaining the Sanskrit term, too short for a separate ""etymology"" section, and too central to be banished to a footnote imho. I see nothing wrong with it. As always, if people don't know what a tatpurusha is, and would like to find out, they can click on the link. (ᛏ)
It's vague for a first-time reader who may think its quite uninteresting or may wonder what is it. That tatpurush is a mouse-click away is not as far-away as the patience that is tested by introducing literary prowess right in the beginning. Besides, the order of merit usually is what, when, whose, etc. Its finer meaning can come in between this list or sometime later. This trend is seen in the pages like Ashok and Sanskrit also. I would like the opinions of others on not only this page, but other such pages also because we must make them readable for the quick-surfer, and for the average Joe.
OK just keep it simple like HAL Tejas, instead of a ""tatpurush compound of..."". That its a tatpurush can be mentioned later.
this is nonsense. Practically every article on Sanskrit terms on Wikipedia gives a brief translation, and an analysis of the components if the term is a compound. See Yajurveda, Ashvamedha, or any other article you care to look at. And no, we will not dumb down articles towards your image of a ""quick surfer average Joe"", we have simple: for that sort of approach. (𒁳)
Please have a look at Nylon, Human, Aircraft and electricity, all of which either provide a separate mention on the etymology of the same in a section dedicated to explaining the same, or a very short and brief one (as in the electricity article).
Ashvamedha, and Yajurveda similarly need to be cleaned-up from this imagined stretch of yours that ""we will not dumb down articles"". Excuse me, this is a publicly viewable, highly accessible encyclopaedia meant for all. Thus, the more serious researcher would look at the tatpurusha compound blabber down in the history or etymology section, whereas the high-school student doing an assignment would be more than content with the info provided in the introduction. .
" | 0 |
By the way, I have told you 4 times that I edit by Jance and have for over 8 or 9 months. Your attempt to imply things that are not true is not unnoticed.. I also suspect admins will see what you are doing, as well. They are not fools, you know. | 0 |
Jimbo disagrees. I asked a reasonable question: you mentioned a policy but you did not specify what part of it you believe applies. You don't have to respond, but then again, I don't have to leave your version in place. | 0 |
Nazi Gold controversy
I have not deleted this section. But I nominate it as a candidate. The section cites a reference. Which is good. But the section does not have much to do with the Bank for International Settlements. Which is bad.
TT | 0 |
A userbox...
You may wish to consider use of this userbox on your userpage: {{User wikipedia/Anti-Administrator}} ... (Meant to tell you before I left!) ++: t/c | 0 |
These events are fictional. What real-world information can there be about them? | 0 |
Oh dear, I forsee one of those tedious disputes over the meaning of NPOV. I can assure you I'm very familiar with it, and I'm very pamiliar with people trying to use it as a bludgeon to get their favoured unbalanced text into an article. Oh, and please mark your reverts as such: (rv) is usually enough . | 0 |
I will suggest you to be more careful not to be the source of a new chaos instead of defusing one....it will be most distressing to witness such one again.
You took some mesures who are unlikely to be the right ones in that case, and it will crave a certain degree of familiarity with the subject and its history to can handle the task properly.
Do not dismiss users with longer experience with the case as it was based on this experience that the talk page was brought out. For instance, I received mails from the person who wrote the biography of the affair both for the french and the english talk page, as those din't knew enough about the matter to start with.
If I were you, I will feel suspicious of receiving approuval and encouragemets about what you are doing, from a person who first heard about this affair for 3 weeks ago, second: heard about it from ybm -the drive force of this affair and person who resurected it from ashes in nov. 2003 - so not much reliable as an eye opener and arbitrary source of informations, and third: who has conducted, since then, a revert war in the best anti-3RR rules, and best ybm styles...
It isn't right for an admi to emit subjectiv and judgementals accusations toward users, as calling them socket puppet and other insulting terminology, as it is usually to be found in the mouth of the persons who in shortage of argumentation, choose to attack people personnaly in best sophistics style.
So no surprise that the person who rever you is the same one who used that language constantly against other users before you stepped in, and who was also doing the reverting job as you are doing it now.
It is abusively unclear, what you are trying to do, and I do hope that a more adequate person will take over the surveillance of this talk page. One with the right degree of integrity, the proper knowledge of the stuff, here physic, a thourough insight in the affair and its history, and a knowledge of the people involved and their characters and profile in regard to the topic.
I think here of Nicholas Turnbull, administrator, and expert in mediation.
I have, unfortunately, to aknowledge the fact that your latest actions have resulted in creating a turmoil on the site, based both on your actions and your utterings, and that you have provocated 50% of the users, who had already been harshly provocated by user r-b-j for several weeks and needed therefor the administrators help to put an end to it, not to overtake the place of the source of turmoils.
I do believe that you are acting your best with your actual knowledge of the facts, but nonetheless you should be more carefull to don't bruise som ego by commiting unfully justified and unjust actions in the process, and as a consequence endanger the quality of the talk page.
As those arguments for and against have been dancing in parallel for far too long time, without everreaching a solid ground of agreement, and as references made by anti bogdanov are always pointed at some unclear statement made by scientifics a long time ago, where most did redraw it, and as all those people of science didn't knew a thing about Theoretical Physic and/or Cosmologie, which this dispute is about, and as the positiv statements, made by specialists in the fields named above, are systematically unaccepted for tricky reasons, as are the statements made on this page by pro-bogdanovian, who are called socket puppets for a yes or for a no, I suggest this affair to be settled once and for all by truly and undiscustably specialists in that field, I named Holger Beck Nielsen professor of the Copenhague Niels Bohr Institut of Theoretical Physic, and Stephen W. Hawking, from the Chair of Mathematic of Cambridge University.
I have already made the necessary steps in order to bring professor Holger Beck Nielsen attention to that matter, and would like to know if anyone feel of doing the same in England.
I tried already to suggest this approach above, but it seems that my suggestion was drawned in the tumults of the fights and remained ignored.
I will ask you to make a join effort to gather your attention on this particular possibility and think of how each of you can take part in its fullfillment, in the best interest of all parts involved.
- Lets work as a team - | 0 |
And just to be clear, an interview with an anonymous person claiming to be an Alawite during a time of conflict isn't exactly reliable and scholarly, when the purpose of said interview is demonisation of a religious group. | 0 |
britannica is just like wiki..if you want to reinsert this false statement(CITE BOOKS OR PROPER SOURCES) and IF U want to misguide readers
then its your fault............ | 0 |
Dark Match or not,being called to the ring as Primo Colon IS his ring name. | 0 |
You are of course correct. Must have been tired! I've moved it. Thanks for spotting it. | 0 |
Nick Jonas
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to the Nick Jonas page. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you continue I will have to block you from editing. | 0 |
Facebook games
Requested Game(s):UNO and scrabble | 0 |
March 13, 2006
Thanks for experimenting with the page Abercrombie on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. | 0 |
contrary to encyclopaedic standards | 0 |
THE MANTIS MANUMITES:JOIN THE CAUSE | 0 |
small> 20:09, 27 May 2007 (UTC | 0 |
User:Eaglestorm/Konpeki no Kantai
I noticed that you still had | 0 |
What is your problem????
alternative rock??????????(like a placebo,radiohead,30stm)...
To the ignorant people who put this genre: Do you even know what Alternative Rock is??? How can you label HIM as Alternative Rock??? The latest album might have some elements of it, but HIM is NOT an Alternative Rock band... They have Gothic Rock elements, Metal elements, Glam Rock elements and much more...they are love metal | 0 |
Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as The Solar System) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. | 0 |
"
The real problem is that User:Musical_Linguist has a personal grudge against me and vigorously hunts for and reverts all of my attempts at dialog with the rest of the Wikipeida community. Clearly, Wikipedia, with 1,000,000 articles is now big enough for the two of us, but she a pretty and polite female and so she has the upper hand. She seems to have nothing to offer the Bill of attainder aritcle except to hit the undo button if she thinks that I have effected any changes. Surely, she has a personal motivation directed towards me personally. That is not really how adminship is supposed to work, is it: that an admin can hold a grudge and personally hunt down an individual other person? Is there not some mechanism by which she can be instructed to direct her attention away from my activities and let the other 800 Wikipedia admins perform the job of protecting Wikipeida from Andrew William Morrow? If the problem is truly Andrew William Morrow, then it will be obvious to the other admins, but in fact, that has not been the case. Oh sure, there has been the occasional problem (if you look at my Wikipedia work as indexed on my web site, you will see that I choose to focus on controversial biographies with a high content of U.S. case law). This Irish woman has nothing to offer the articles she has personally targeted via this tool Template:Pinktulip except to hit the undo button. She has done no research. She has conducted no dialog with other editors. Like you, she always claims to be ""too busy"" to engage in any actual dialog, but she has plenty of time to sit around and chat with her Catholic pro-life friends and hit the undo button every time she sees non-vandalism contributions that she simply does not like. As you can see by her user page, she is highly prone to view the work of others through the rather narrow prism of her Pope's worldview. If you study Special:Contributions/Musical Linguist you will see that she spends many, many hours on Wikiepdia every day and note the quick response time of her reverts: She must be monitoring her watch list vigorously. Is this really what you want Wikipedia to be about? Letting admins, no matter how polite, intelligent and pretty impose their worldview on others? Is it such a tragedy to put some horse-blinders on her to say: ""For these specific users and these specific articles, you will stay away. You have had much more than your fair turn at these specific users and these specific articles and now you, dear and valued admin, are being administratively rotated out of them and you will stay rotated out of them for a good, long time."" Is that such a tragedy? Fred: It is only a tragedy if the problem is really within the admin herself, rather than within the targeted or banned user(s). The mature admin would not take such instructions as an insult, but simply as a matter of due course. Musical Linguist is much like the childless woman hovering over someone else's child, ever-ready to snatch the child and claim it for her own. It is a natural impulse, but it requies intervention because it is also a disorderly impulse. All I have done is to flush the woman out by getting her to fill out the ""Pinktulip"" template completely. Her contribution to the information content the articles listed in the Pinktulip template is zero, but but she now exerts total control of them. She is merely a sterile, charming, controlling woman and she should herself now be controlled. She is all process and no results. That is not what Wikipeida was supposed to be about.
AWM " | 0 |
Excuse me, this is a LIST of SAW media, not a 'let's just add three theme parks that have saw init lol', and SAW Haunted Attraction Presented By Pizza Hut, Monster Energy, TicketWeb, Ticketmaster, MySpace and Jack FM was aka 'The Official SAW Attraction' and was located in Brea, California. SAW Snacks n' Souvenirs Kiosk sells SAW stuff at THORPE PARK. May I repeat, this article is called LIST of Saw media. | 0 |
- Portrait de Félix Fénéon | 0 |
I certainly do not ignore anyone's views, I have been flexible, listened carefully, and changed my positions often to accomodate and work toward concensus. This is not here about pov - we have simple facts to include. The UNSC is the sole judicial authority in regard to the crime of aggresion, a simple fact. It has made it's decision years ago, another fact. The legality of the war was settled years ago, a most relevant fact. The facts bother you, you cannot debate these points, so you silently revert. I suggest following WP policy for controversial topics, what do you think is non-controversial - if not the settled law on this invasion? Two people who will not debate, but silently revert, who will not work toward a consensus cannot be worked with. I cannot make you do any of these, just ask that you reconsider trying these strategies instead. | 0 |
"Indeed, excellent work with the Antarctica stub sorting too. You should go back to creating stubs I think. Moaning about ""sub stubs"" is so 2008.... Wikipedia is going to be around for a long long time by the looks of it so why not start content which can be built upon...♦ Dr. Blofeld
" | 0 |
"
My comment was an answer to Anthon01. I do expect an answer from you on this talk page and am still waiting. It's only one question. / talk " | 0 |
"
More ""Jealousy"" ""Van Buren stood ready to wheel northern Bucktails and southern Radicals into the anti-Bank crusade. The great lesson of New York politics was never to oppose a strong current of popular feeling, and in New York he got room for anti-Bank maneuver from the Safety Fund, Wall Street jealousy of Philadelphia, and the hunger of some upstate Bucktail bankers for the federal deposits."" passage is from The Market Revolution: Jacksonian America, 1815-1846.'' Charles Sellers 1991. Page 324.
" | 0 |
"
What links here , showing only transclusions. Copy-and-paste into Star Office, find & replace ""Talk:"" with ""[["", replace "" (transclusion) (links)"" with ""]]"". Not all that high-tech, but it works. '''''' " | 0 |
File:उलझे अनसुलझे मसलों को मिनटों में सुलझा दूँगी !.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:उलझे अनसुलझे मसलों को मिनटों में सुलझा दूँगी !.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. (t • c) | 0 |
"
That email is actually not sufficient: we can't host anything ""allowed for Wikipedia"", it has to be licensed under a free license. " | 0 |
There's no need to question my grasp on reality, Martin. I had provided a link to a professional review that called into question the songwriters' sincerity on the point of the album being intended as satire, but it was deleted. But if all we're interested in is the band's intentions, that's fine. I'll waste no more time on this.65.69.204.131 | 0 |
Bucoviana
People from Bucovina speak Romanian. There is no dialect or grai in Romanian Language. It is only a very little accent. that is all! a true Moldavian. | 0 |
Wikipedia right now is in the fight for its life to regain credibility after the Seigenthaler incident and it is users like you, who selflessly fight to maintain decorum and NPOV that keep the beliefs and hopes that Wikipedia was founded on alive. For this, I'm proud to support you in your efforts to become an administrator and will be glad to have you working towards truth, civility and credibility. | 0 |
"
Mr LULU, Your Screed (statement) ""The latest....DAILY SLANDER"" is a bit over the top. You sound like a partisan, POV Pusher, instead of a NPOV editor. Such a salacious statements shows your lack of knowledge of the word ""Slander"" (for the record proper usage is ""Liable""). I question your temperament to edit on such a politically charged article. 68.251.50.5
" | 0 |
Irrelevant material removed, correct citations provided. | 0 |
, 3 June 2007 (UTC) I see that the placement of the tag was misleading. You want to delete the picture of Charlie Christian? Why? And replace it with? The image has been there a long time, long before I began editing a very erroneous article you paid no attention to. You would be better served to use the communication forums instead of bullying your way through. 20:12 | 0 |
I would argue that a fraction is a number, in that it represents a quantity. It may be different to an integer, decimal, etc, in which case it is a special kind of number, written in a different way to integers and decimals. | 0 |
You're very correct, it's a pity that this took place and it is a shame that Western media does not report it, as any independent nonpartisan media should do. I pointed it out many times on 22 Febr. already on various websites, but usually got only angry reactions as if I was supporting this kleptocrat. Obviously, by now Yanukovich is also illegal, as he has asked foreign country for military intervention, which may qualify as high treason, but this in no way invalidates that the new government in Ukraine took power illegally (which is one of its many blunders). | 0 |
. Surely we can find a better one? | 0 |
What was the purpose of your swapping of Mr. Escher's birth and death dates? Please try the discussion page, you'll get more fun, believe me.
Regards, | 0 |
Well I would try not to be influenced by what he says elsewhere, however strange that may be, but address the arguments or reasons he is giving here. But as I can't see any coherent ones, I would just ignore it. Fine work on the introduction, I must say. As for myself, they didn't notice I had two accounts, even though I mentioned it on my user page, and only deleted | 0 |
"
Well the accusation of vandalism remains unsupported by any attempt to justify it, and the accusation that I said anything about ""sorting him out"" (what does he think I am? a 14 year old in the playground?) can be seen from the talk history to be pure fanciful invention. If you believe that this editor has anything positive to add to the project, perhaps you would like to steer him towards the straight and narrow. " | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.