question stringclasses 10
values | solution stringclasses 10
values | eval_internal_cot stringclasses 10
values | eval_solution stringclasses 10
values | eval_prompt listlengths 2 2 | eval_steps listlengths 21 38 | steps_word_count int64 875 1.62k | trace_word_count int64 936 2.66k | word_count_diff int64 0 1.03k | measurement_type stringclasses 1
value | measurement_prompt stringclasses 10
values | row_id int64 0 9 | measurement_answer_verification_final_count int64 2 10 | measurement_answer_verification_reasoning stringclasses 10
values | measurement_answer_verification_metadata sequencelengths 2 10 | measurement_answer_verification_raw_response stringclasses 10
values | measurement_step_verification_final_count int64 1 9 | measurement_step_verification_reasoning stringclasses 10
values | measurement_step_verification_metadata sequencelengths 0 9 | measurement_step_verification_raw_response stringclasses 10
values | measurement_reasoning_deliberation_final_count int64 1 14 | measurement_reasoning_deliberation_reasoning stringclasses 10
values | measurement_reasoning_deliberation_metadata sequencelengths 0 14 | measurement_reasoning_deliberation_raw_response stringclasses 10
values | metadata_verification_step_needed sequencelengths 0 9 | metadata_verification_step_needed_judge_data listlengths 1 9 ⌀ | metadata_answers_correct sequencelengths 2 10 | metadata_answers_correct_judge_data listlengths 2 10 | metadata_reasoning_deliberation_needed sequencelengths 0 14 | metadata_reasoning_deliberation_needed_judge_data listlengths 1 14 ⌀ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
What is the solution to the long multiplication equation below?
8274 x 3529
Think step by step. | 29198946 | Okay, so I need to multiply 8274 by 3529. Hmm, that's a pretty big multiplication problem. Let me think about how to approach this step by step. I remember that long multiplication involves breaking down the numbers by each digit and then adding up the results. Let me try to recall the exact process.
First, I should w... | The solution to the long multiplication equation \(8274 \times 3529\) is calculated as follows:
1. **Break down the multiplication by each digit of 3529:**
- **Ones place (9):**
\(8274 \times 9 = 74{,}466\)
- **Tens place (2, shifted one position left):**
\(8274 \times 2 = 16{,}548 \rightarrow 165{... | [
{
"content": "You are a reasoning assistant. Given a chain-of-thought reasoning trace, output a JSON object with a single key 'steps' whose value is an array of step objects. Each step object must include the following keys: 'subgoal' (the intended subgoal for that step). 'content' (the exact text of the reason... | [
{
"contains_final_answer": false,
"content": "Okay, so I need to multiply 8274 by 3529. Hmm, that's a pretty big multiplication problem. Let me think about how to approach this step by step. I remember that long multiplication involves breaking down the numbers by each digit and then adding up the results. ... | 1,216 | 1,216 | 0 | answer_verification | How many times does the following reasoning trace propose a final answer then verify it or double check it? Provide a number that shows how many times the model proposed the final answer (double checking the final answer means you are proposing a final answer). It may repeat the final answer (verification) or derive a... | 0 | 2 | <thinking>To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in the reasoning trace where the model either:
Explicitly computes and presents a final result,
Restates or confirms that same result,
Attempts to verify it using an alternative method.
Let’s step through the trace.
1. ... | [
"29,198,946",
"29,198,946"
] | <thinking>To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in the reasoning trace where the model either:
Explicitly computes and presents a final result,
Restates or confirms that same result,
Attempts to verify it using an alternative method.
Let’s step through the trace.
1. ... | 7 | <thinking>Let's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an intermediate computation or reasoning step, excluding any full-problem re-evaluation or final answer re-check.
We are looking specifically for instances where the model makes a sub-computation, doubts or checks it, and re-pe... | [
"Wait, maybe breaking it down more clearly:\n\n74,466\n+165,480\n=?\nStarting from the right:\n6 + 0 = 6\n6 + 8 = 14 (write 4, carry 1)\n4 + 4 + 1 = 9\n7 + 5 = 12 (write 2, carry 1)\n4 + 6 + 1 = 11 (write 1, carry 1)\n0 + 1 + 1 = 2\nSo total is 239,946. Okay, that seems right.",
"239,946 + 4,137,000.\n\n239,946\n... | <thinking>Let's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an intermediate computation or reasoning step, excluding any full-problem re-evaluation or final answer re-check.
We are looking specifically for instances where the model makes a sub-computation, doubts or checks it, and re-pe... | 1 | <thinking>To answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoning (i.e., deliberates on whether the step or path it's currently pursuing is appropriate before either continuing or switching)—we need to identify all moments in the reasoning trace where:
- The model questions its current ... | [
"Hmm, that's a pretty big multiplication problem. Let me think about how to approach this step by step. I remember that long multiplication involves breaking down the numbers by each digit and then adding up the results. Let me try to recall the exact process."
] | <thinking>To answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoning (i.e., deliberates on whether the step or path it's currently pursuing is appropriate before either continuing or switching)—we need to identify all moments in the reasoning trace where:
- The model questions its current ... | [
true,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false
] | [
{
"error_explanation": "Initially, the addition was attempted without clear alignment of the numbers, and the carrying was inconsistent, which could result in an incorrect total. The error was in the calculation process and layout, risking an incorrect sum if not corrected.",
"next_step": "Next, add this to... | [
true,
true
] | [
{
"correct": true,
"reasoning": "The solution given is 29,198,946, which matches the ground truth 29198946 when ignoring formatting differences such as commas. Both represent the same number, so the solution is correct."
},
{
"correct": true,
"reasoning": "The provided solution is 29,198,946, an... | [
false
] | [
{
"change_in_direction_explanation": "The deliberation was essentially a brief high-level acknowledgement of the complexity and the method to use (long multiplication) but did not change the direction of the reasoning. The model was already considering long multiplication, and after deliberation, it proceeded w... |
"What is the solution to the long multiplication equation below?\n\n9341 x 4130\n\nThink step by ste(...TRUNCATED) | 38578330 | "Okay, so I need to solve 9341 multiplied by 4130. Hmm, let me think about how to approach this. I r(...TRUNCATED) | "The solution to the long multiplication equation 9341 × 4130 is calculated as follows:\n\n1. **Bre(...TRUNCATED) | [{"content":"You are a reasoning assistant. Given a chain-of-thought reasoning trace, output a JSON (...TRUNCATED) | [{"contains_final_answer":false,"content":"Okay, so I need to solve 9341 multiplied by 4130. Hmm, le(...TRUNCATED) | 929 | 936 | 7 | answer_verification | "How many times does the following reasoning trace propose a final answer then verify it or double c(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | 3 | "<thinking>To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in (...TRUNCATED) | [
"38,578,330",
"38,578,330",
"38,578,330"
] | "<thinking>To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in (...TRUNCATED) | 3 | "<thinking>Let's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an inte(...TRUNCATED) | ["Wait, no, that's not right. Wait, 93,410 is 90,000 + 3,410. So adding 3,736,400 + 90,000 = 3,826,4(...TRUNCATED) | "<thinking>Let's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an inte(...TRUNCATED) | 3 | "<thinking>To answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoning(...TRUNCATED) | ["Hmm, let me think about how to approach this. I remember that multiplying large numbers can be bro(...TRUNCATED) | "<thinking>To answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoning(...TRUNCATED) | [
false,
false,
false
] | [{"error_explanation":"The previous step's addition of 3,736,400 + 93,410 was not explicitly incorre(...TRUNCATED) | [
true,
false,
true
] | [{"correct":true,"reasoning":"The given solution is 38,578,330 and the ground truth solution is 3857(...TRUNCATED) | [
true,
true,
false
] | [{"change_in_direction_explanation":"The deliberation led the model to adopt a factoring approach by(...TRUNCATED) |
"What is the solution to the long multiplication equation below?\n\n6637 x 5510\n\nThink step by ste(...TRUNCATED) | 36569870 | "Okay, so I need to multiply 6637 by 5510. Hmm, let's see. I remember that long multiplication invol(...TRUNCATED) | "To solve the long multiplication equation \\(6637 \\times 5510\\), we can break down the process in(...TRUNCATED) | [{"content":"You are a reasoning assistant. Given a chain-of-thought reasoning trace, output a JSON (...TRUNCATED) | [{"contains_final_answer":false,"content":"Okay, so I need to multiply 6637 by 5510. Hmm, let's see.(...TRUNCATED) | 878 | 1,300 | 422 | answer_verification | "How many times does the following reasoning trace propose a final answer then verify it or double c(...TRUNCATED) | 2 | 4 | "<thinking>To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in (...TRUNCATED) | [
"36569870",
"36569870",
"36569870",
"36569870"
] | "<thinking>To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in (...TRUNCATED) | 1 | "<thinking>\nLet's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an in(...TRUNCATED) | [
"Wait, let me check that again to make sure I didn't make a mistake in addition."
] | "<thinking>\nLet's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an in(...TRUNCATED) | 3 | "<thinking>\nTo answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoni(...TRUNCATED) | ["Hmm, let's see. I remember that long multiplication involves breaking down the numbers into smalle(...TRUNCATED) | "<thinking>\nTo answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoni(...TRUNCATED) | [
false
] | [{"error_explanation":"There was no error in the previous addition step; the calculations were accur(...TRUNCATED) | [
true,
true,
true,
true
] | [{"correct":true,"reasoning":"The problem is to multiply 6637 by 5510. The provided solution is 3656(...TRUNCATED) | [
false,
true,
true
] | [{"change_in_direction_explanation":"The deliberation recognizes the complexity of four-digit by fou(...TRUNCATED) |
"What is the solution to the long multiplication equation below?\n\n8996 x 8373\n\nThink step by ste(...TRUNCATED) | 75323508 | "Okay, so I need to multiply 8996 by 8373. Hmm, that's a pretty big multiplication problem. Let me t(...TRUNCATED) | "To solve the long multiplication equation \\(8996 \\times 8373\\), we break down the multiplication(...TRUNCATED) | [{"content":"You are a reasoning assistant. Given a chain-of-thought reasoning trace, output a JSON (...TRUNCATED) | [{"contains_final_answer":false,"content":"Okay, so I need to multiply 8996 by 8373. Hmm, that's a p(...TRUNCATED) | 1,005 | 1,302 | 297 | answer_verification | "How many times does the following reasoning trace propose a final answer then verify it or double c(...TRUNCATED) | 4 | 5 | "<thinking>\nTo determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point i(...TRUNCATED) | [
"75323508",
"75323508",
"75323508",
"75323508",
"75323508"
] | "<thinking>\nTo determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point i(...TRUNCATED) | 9 | "<thinking>\nLet's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an in(...TRUNCATED) | ["Wait, let me check that again. 8996 x 7:\n\nStarting from the right:\n6*7=42, carryover 4.\n9*7=63(...TRUNCATED) | "<thinking>\nLet's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an in(...TRUNCATED) | 6 | "<thinking>To answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoning(...TRUNCATED) | ["Hmm, that's a pretty big multiplication problem. Let me think about how to approach this. I rememb(...TRUNCATED) | "<thinking>To answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoning(...TRUNCATED) | [
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false
] | [{"error_explanation":"There is no detected error in the previous step's computation as both steps a(...TRUNCATED) | [
true,
true,
true,
true,
true
] | [{"correct":true,"reasoning":"The problem asks for the product of 8996 and 8373. The provided soluti(...TRUNCATED) | [
true,
true,
true,
false,
true,
false,
true
] | [{"change_in_direction_explanation":"The deliberation explicitly considers an alternative multiplica(...TRUNCATED) |
"What is the solution to the long multiplication equation below?\n\n9275 x 6116\n\nThink step by ste(...TRUNCATED) | 56725900 | "Okay, so I need to multiply 9275 by 6116. Hmm, that's a pretty big multiplication problem. Let me t(...TRUNCATED) | "To solve the long multiplication equation \\(9275 \\times 6116\\), we can break down the multiplier(...TRUNCATED) | [{"content":"You are a reasoning assistant. Given a chain-of-thought reasoning trace, output a JSON (...TRUNCATED) | [{"contains_final_answer":false,"content":"Okay, so I need to multiply 9275 by 6116. Hmm, that's a p(...TRUNCATED) | 1,177 | 1,617 | 440 | answer_verification | "How many times does the following reasoning trace propose a final answer then verify it or double c(...TRUNCATED) | 5 | 5 | "<thinking>To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in (...TRUNCATED) | [
"56725900",
"56725900",
"56725900",
"56725900",
"56725900"
] | "<thinking>To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in (...TRUNCATED) | 5 | "<thinking>\nLet's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an in(...TRUNCATED) | ["Wait, let me check that addition again to make sure I didn't make a mistake.\n\nStarting with 55,6(...TRUNCATED) | "<thinking>\nLet's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an in(...TRUNCATED) | 5 | "<thinking>\nTo answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoni(...TRUNCATED) | ["But maybe it's easier to break down 6116 into 6000 + 100 + 10 + 6. That way, I can multiply 9275 b(...TRUNCATED) | "<thinking>\nTo answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoni(...TRUNCATED) | [
false,
false,
false,
true,
false
] | [{"error_explanation":"The previous step did not contain any arithmetic mistakes or errors in the ad(...TRUNCATED) | [
true,
true,
true,
true,
true
] | [{"correct":true,"reasoning":"The given problem is to multiply 9275 by 6116. The solution provided i(...TRUNCATED) | [
true,
true,
false,
false,
true
] | [{"change_in_direction_explanation":"The deliberation introduced an explicit plan to break down 6116(...TRUNCATED) |
"What is the solution to the long multiplication equation below?\n\n1556 x 1996\n\nThink step by ste(...TRUNCATED) | 3105776 | "Okay, so I need to multiply 1556 by 1996. Hmm, that's a pretty big multiplication problem. Let me t(...TRUNCATED) | "To solve the long multiplication equation \\(1556 \\times 1996\\), we can use the distributive prop(...TRUNCATED) | [{"content":"You are a reasoning assistant. Given a chain-of-thought reasoning trace, output a JSON (...TRUNCATED) | [{"contains_final_answer":false,"content":"Okay, so I need to multiply 1556 by 1996. Hmm, that's a p(...TRUNCATED) | 961 | 1,026 | 65 | answer_verification | "How many times does the following reasoning trace propose a final answer then verify it or double c(...TRUNCATED) | 6 | 4 | "<thinking>To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in (...TRUNCATED) | [
"3105776",
"3105776",
"3105776",
"3105776"
] | "<thinking>To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in (...TRUNCATED) | 2 | "<thinking>Let's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an inte(...TRUNCATED) | ["Wait, let me check that subtraction again to be sure. Starting from 3,112,000:\n\n3,112,000\n- (...TRUNCATED) | "<thinking>Let's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an inte(...TRUNCATED) | 6 | "<thinking>\nTo answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoni(...TRUNCATED) | ["Let me think about the best way to approach this. I remember that breaking down numbers into small(...TRUNCATED) | "<thinking>\nTo answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoni(...TRUNCATED) | [
false,
false
] | [{"error_explanation":"There was no error in the previous subtraction result; the verification step (...TRUNCATED) | [
true,
true,
true,
true
] | [{"correct":true,"reasoning":"The solution given is 3105776 for the multiplication 1556 x 1996. To v(...TRUNCATED) | [
true,
true,
true,
false,
false,
true
] | [{"change_in_direction_explanation":"The deliberation caused the model to shift from an unspecified (...TRUNCATED) |
"What is the solution to the long multiplication equation below?\n\n3622 x 5165\n\nThink step by ste(...TRUNCATED) | 18707630 | "Okay, so I need to multiply 3622 by 5165. Hmm, that's a pretty big multiplication problem. Let me t(...TRUNCATED) | "To solve the long multiplication equation \\(3622 \\times 5165\\), we can break down the multiplier(...TRUNCATED) | [{"content":"You are a reasoning assistant. Given a chain-of-thought reasoning trace, output a JSON (...TRUNCATED) | [{"contains_final_answer":false,"content":"Okay, so I need to multiply 3622 by 5165. Hmm, that's a p(...TRUNCATED) | 875 | 1,636 | 761 | answer_verification | "How many times does the following reasoning trace propose a final answer then verify it or double c(...TRUNCATED) | 7 | 10 | "<thinking>To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in (...TRUNCATED) | ["18707630","18707630","18707630","18707630","18707630","18707630","18707630","18707630","18707630",(...TRUNCATED) | "<thinking>To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in (...TRUNCATED) | 5 | "<thinking>Let's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an inte(...TRUNCATED) | ["Wait, let me check that addition again to make sure I didn't make a mistake. So starting with 18,1(...TRUNCATED) | "<thinking>Let's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an inte(...TRUNCATED) | 14 | "<thinking>To answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoning(...TRUNCATED) | ["Hmm, that's a pretty big multiplication problem. Let me think about how to approach this step by s(...TRUNCATED) | "<thinking>To answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoning(...TRUNCATED) | [
false,
false,
false,
false,
false
] | [{"error_explanation":"There was no error in the previous addition step. The sum 18,707,630 was corr(...TRUNCATED) | [
true,
true,
true,
true,
true,
true,
true,
true,
true,
true
] | [{"correct":true,"reasoning":"The solution provided is 18707630 for the multiplication of 3622 by 51(...TRUNCATED) | [
false,
true,
false,
true,
false,
false,
true,
true,
false,
true,
true,
true,
false,
false
] | [{"change_in_direction_explanation":"The deliberation did not change the reasoning direction. The mo(...TRUNCATED) |
"What is the solution to the long multiplication equation below?\n\n6624 x 7409\n\nThink step by ste(...TRUNCATED) | 49077216 | "Okay, so I need to multiply 6624 by 7409. Hmm, that's a pretty big multiplication. Let me think abo(...TRUNCATED) | "To solve the long multiplication equation \\(6624 \\times 7409\\), we break down the multiplication(...TRUNCATED) | [{"content":"You are a reasoning assistant. Given a chain-of-thought reasoning trace, output a JSON (...TRUNCATED) | [{"contains_final_answer":false,"content":"Okay, so I need to multiply 6624 by 7409. Hmm, that's a p(...TRUNCATED) | 1,346 | 2,091 | 745 | answer_verification | "How many times does the following reasoning trace propose a final answer then verify it or double c(...TRUNCATED) | 8 | 3 | "<thinking>To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in (...TRUNCATED) | [
"49077216",
"49077216",
"49077216"
] | "<thinking>To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in (...TRUNCATED) | 2 | "<thinking>Let's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an inte(...TRUNCATED) | ["Then add two zeros: 2,649,600. Wait, no, 26,496 with two zeros is 2,649,600? Wait, 26,496 x 100 = (...TRUNCATED) | "<thinking>Let's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an inte(...TRUNCATED) | 11 | "<thinking>To answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoning(...TRUNCATED) | ["Hmm, that's a pretty big multiplication. Let me think about how to approach this. I remember that (...TRUNCATED) | "<thinking>To answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoning(...TRUNCATED) | [
false,
false
] | [{"error_explanation":"There was no error in the previous step; 6624 x 4 was correctly calculated as(...TRUNCATED) | [
true,
true,
true
] | [{"correct":true,"reasoning":"The problem asks for the product of 6624 and 7409. The provided soluti(...TRUNCATED) | [
true,
true,
false,
false,
true,
false,
true,
true,
true,
false,
false
] | [{"change_in_direction_explanation":"The deliberation explicitly considered the planning approach an(...TRUNCATED) |
"What is the solution to the long multiplication equation below?\n\n5086 x 6642\n\nThink step by ste(...TRUNCATED) | 33781212 | "Okay, so I need to multiply 5086 by 6642. Hmm, that's a pretty big multiplication problem. Let me t(...TRUNCATED) | "To solve the long multiplication equation \\(5086 \\times 6642\\), we break down the multiplication(...TRUNCATED) | [{"content":"You are a reasoning assistant. Given a chain-of-thought reasoning trace, output a JSON (...TRUNCATED) | [{"contains_final_answer":false,"content":"Okay, so I need to multiply 5086 by 6642. Hmm, that's a p(...TRUNCATED) | 1,623 | 2,657 | 1,034 | answer_verification | "How many times does the following reasoning trace propose a final answer then verify it or double c(...TRUNCATED) | 3 | 5 | "<thinking>To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in (...TRUNCATED) | [
"33781212",
"33781212",
"33781212",
"33781212",
"33781212"
] | "<thinking>To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in (...TRUNCATED) | 8 | "<thinking>Let's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an inte(...TRUNCATED) | [] | "<thinking>Let's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an inte(...TRUNCATED) | 10 | "<thinking>To answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoning(...TRUNCATED) | ["Hmm, that's a pretty big multiplication problem. Let me think about how to approach this step by s(...TRUNCATED) | "<thinking>To answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoning(...TRUNCATED) | [] | null | [
true,
true,
true,
true,
true
] | [{"correct":true,"reasoning":"To verify the solution, multiply 5086 by 6642 step by step.\n\n1. Mult(...TRUNCATED) | [
false,
false,
false,
false,
true,
true,
true,
false,
true,
false
] | [{"change_in_direction_explanation":"The deliberation simply restated the intent to proceed with the(...TRUNCATED) |
"What is the solution to the long multiplication equation below?\n\n2861 x 2656\n\nThink step by ste(...TRUNCATED) | 7598816 | "Okay, so I need to multiply 2861 by 2656. Hmm, that's a pretty big multiplication problem. Let me t(...TRUNCATED) | "To solve the long multiplication equation \\(2861 \\times 2656\\), we break down the multiplication(...TRUNCATED) | [{"content":"You are a reasoning assistant. Given a chain-of-thought reasoning trace, output a JSON (...TRUNCATED) | [{"contains_final_answer":false,"content":"Okay, so I need to multiply 2861 by 2656. Hmm, that's a p(...TRUNCATED) | 921 | 1,466 | 545 | answer_verification | "How many times does the following reasoning trace propose a final answer then verify it or double c(...TRUNCATED) | 9 | 6 | "<thinking>To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in (...TRUNCATED) | [
"7598816",
"7598816",
"7598816",
"7598816",
"7598816",
"7598816"
] | "<thinking>To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in (...TRUNCATED) | 5 | "<thinking>Let's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an inte(...TRUNCATED) | ["Wait, 6 is in the hundreds place, so it's actually 600 x 2861. So, 6 x 2861 is 17166, then times 1(...TRUNCATED) | "<thinking>Let's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an inte(...TRUNCATED) | 2 | "<thinking>To answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoning(...TRUNCATED) | [] | "<thinking>To answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoning(...TRUNCATED) | [
false,
false,
false,
false,
false
] | [{"error_explanation":"There was no concrete error in the prior step; the arithmetic and reasoning a(...TRUNCATED) | [
true,
true,
true,
true,
true,
true
] | [{"correct":true,"reasoning":"The problem asks to compute 2861 multiplied by 2656. The provided solu(...TRUNCATED) | [] | null |
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 3