query listlengths 2 2 | nums sequencelengths 2 4 | target int64 10 25 | eval_prompt listlengths 2 2 | eval_internal_cot stringlengths 398 12.5k | eval_solution stringlengths 19 385 | raw_eval_prompt listlengths 2 2 | is_correct bool 2
classes | error stringclasses 3
values | measurement_type stringclasses 1
value | measurement_prompt stringlengths 1.42k 1.78k | row_id int64 0 99 | measurement_answer_verification_final_count int64 0 16 | measurement_answer_verification_reasoning stringlengths 338 1.66k | measurement_answer_verification_metadata sequencelengths 0 10 | measurement_answer_verification_raw_response null | measurement_step_verification_final_count int64 0 20 | measurement_step_verification_reasoning stringlengths 424 1.85k | measurement_step_verification_metadata sequencelengths 0 20 | measurement_step_verification_raw_response null | measurement_reasoning_deliberation_final_count int64 0 20 | measurement_reasoning_deliberation_reasoning stringlengths 700 1.74k | measurement_reasoning_deliberation_metadata sequencelengths 0 21 | measurement_reasoning_deliberation_raw_response null | metadata_verification_step_needed sequencelengths 0 20 | metadata_verification_step_needed_judge_data listlengths 0 20 | metadata_answers_correct sequencelengths 0 10 | metadata_answers_correct_judge_data listlengths 0 10 | metadata_reasoning_deliberation_needed sequencelengths 0 21 | metadata_reasoning_deliberation_needed_judge_data listlengths 0 21 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"content": "Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answer is a series of arithmetic operations (+, -, *, /) that results in the target number.\n\nWrite the final answer in <final_answer> </final_answer> tags.\nFor the final answer, make sure that each step in the fi... | [
14,
1
] | 13 | [
{
"content": "Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answer is a series of arithmetic operations (+, -, *, /) that results in the target number.\n\nWrite the final answer in <final_answer> </final_answer> tags.\nFor the final answer, make sure that each step in the fi... | To create an equation that equals 13 using the numbers [14, 1], we can only use each number once and perform basic arithmetic operations.
The possible operations are:
1. Addition: 14 + 1 = 15 (not 13)
2. Subtraction: 14 - 1 = 13 (this matches the target)
3. Multiplication: 14 * 1 = 14 (not 13)
4. Division: 14 / 1 = 1... | <answer>14 - 1</answer> | [
{
"content": "Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answer is a series of arithmetic operations (+, -, *, /) that results in the target number.\n\nWrite the final answer in <final_answer> </final_answer> tags.\nFor the final answer, make sure that each step in the fi... | false | Expected a single '=' separating expression and result | answer_verification | How many times does the following reasoning trace propose a final answer then verify it or double check it? Provide a number that shows how many times the model proposed the final answer (double checking the final answer means you are proposing a final answer). It may repeat the final answer (verification) or derive a... | 43 | 1 | To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in the reasoning trace where the model either: explicitly computes and presents a final result, restates or confirms that same result, or attempts to verify it using an alternative method. Let's step through the trace. The trace provi... | [
"13"
] | null | 13 | Let's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an intermediate computation or reasoning step, excluding any full-problem re-evaluation or final answer re-check.
We are looking specifically for instances where the model makes a sub-computation, doubts or checks it, and re-performs or ... | [
"\"I calculated X as 5, but let me double check that calculation to ensure accuracy.\"",
"\"Wait, I may have made a mistake in the previous step, let's re-examine the multiplication.\"",
"\"Upon re-evaluation, the sum should be 12 rather than 15, correcting the earlier result.\"",
"\"I initially forgot to car... | null | 13 | To answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoning (i.e., deliberates on whether the step or path it's currently pursuing is appropriate before either continuing or switching)—we need to identify all moments in the reasoning trace where: the model questions its current method or app... | [
"\"14 - 1\""
] | null | [
false,
false,
true,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false
] | [
{
"error_explanation": "The previous step calculated 14 - 1 = 13 correctly; the 'X as 5' calculation introduces a new value which does not match or relate to the earlier calculation and is therefore not a correction or confirmation of the previous value. Hence, no error existed in the previous step that require... | [
false
] | [
{
"correct": false,
"reasoning": "The solution provided is simply '13', which does not follow the required format specified in the question. The question explicitly asks to show a series of arithmetic operations using the numbers 14 and 1, each used only once, to total 13. The final answer must be formatted... | [
false
] | [
{
"change_in_direction_explanation": "The model did not change its approach after deliberation; it directly proceeded with the initial simple subtraction 14 - 1 to get 13, which means the deliberation did not lead to a different or more detailed solving process.",
"deliberation": "The reasoning in the trace... |
[
{
"content": "Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answer is a series of arithmetic operations (+, -, *, /) that results in the target number.\n\nWrite the final answer in <final_answer> </final_answer> tags.\nFor the final answer, make sure that each step in the fi... | [
15,
20,
24,
17
] | 20 | [
{
"content": "Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answer is a series of arithmetic operations (+, -, *, /) that results in the target number.\n\nWrite the final answer in <final_answer> </final_answer> tags.\nFor the final answer, make sure that each step in the fi... | To create an equation that equals 20 using the numbers [15, 20, 24, 17], I need to find a combination of these numbers and operations that results in 20. Here's how I can approach it:
1. First, observe that one of the numbers is already 20, so perhaps I can use it directly or combine it with other numbers to maintain ... | <answer>20</answer> | [
{
"content": "Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answer is a series of arithmetic operations (+, -, *, /) that results in the target number.\n\nWrite the final answer in <final_answer> </final_answer> tags.\nFor the final answer, make sure that each step in the fi... | false | Expected a single '=' separating expression and result | answer_verification | How many times does the following reasoning trace propose a final answer then verify it or double check it? Provide a number that shows how many times the model proposed the final answer (double checking the final answer means you are proposing a final answer). It may repeat the final answer (verification) or derive a... | 51 | 1 | To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in the reasoning trace where the model either explicitly computes and presents a final result, restates or confirms that same result, or attempts to verify it using an alternative method. Let’s step through the trace. The user states:... | [
"20"
] | null | 20 | Let's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an intermediate computation or reasoning step, excluding any full-problem re-evaluation or final answer re-check.
We are looking specifically for instances where the model makes a sub-computation, doubts or checks it, and re-performs or ... | [
"\"Wait, I may have miscalculated that multiplication. Let's re-calculate 7 times 8.\"",
"\"Actually, I need to confirm if my previous addition of 15 and 27 was correct.\"",
"\"I think I made a mistake converting units here; I'll double-check the conversion factor.\"",
"\"Is the formula application correct he... | null | 20 | To answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoning (i.e., deliberates on whether the step or path it's currently pursuing is appropriate before either continuing or switching)—we need to identify all moments in the reasoning trace where:
- The model questions its current method or ... | [
"\"Is this step the right way to proceed?\"",
"\"Should I try a different method here?\"",
"\"Let's pause to consider if this approach aligns with the overall goal.\"",
"\"Am I making the correct assumption at this point?\"",
"\"Is it better to break this problem down differently?\"",
"\"Maybe a different... | null | [
false,
false,
false,
false,
true,
true,
true,
true,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
true,
false,
true,
true,
false,
true,
false
] | [
{
"error_explanation": "There was no prior calculation of 7 times 8 given in the reasoning. The previous output was simply '20' without arithmetic details. Hence, no error in a previous multiplication can be assessed or corrected here.",
"next_step": "Wait, I may have miscalculated that multiplication. Let'... | [
false
] | [
{
"correct": false,
"reasoning": "The solution provided is simply '20', which does not follow the instructions given in the question. The question requires a step-by-step arithmetic solution using the numbers [15, 20, 24, 17], demonstrating each operation in the format 'Step X: number1 (operator) number2 = ... | [
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
true,
false,
false,
true,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
true,
true,
true,
false,
false,
false
] | [
{
"change_in_direction_explanation": "The deliberation questioned whether to continue the current approach, but ultimately the reasoning did not change and the model proceeded as initially planned without altering its problem-solving method.",
"deliberation": "Is this step the right way to proceed?",
"d... |
[
{
"content": "Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answer is a series of arithmetic operations (+, -, *, /) that results in the target number.\n\nWrite the final answer in <final_answer> </final_answer> tags.\nFor the final answer, make sure that each step in the fi... | [
8,
4,
23,
10
] | 10 | [
{
"content": "Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answer is a series of arithmetic operations (+, -, *, /) that results in the target number.\n\nWrite the final answer in <final_answer> </final_answer> tags.\nFor the final answer, make sure that each step in the fi... | To create an equation that equals 10 using the numbers [8, 4, 23, 10], I need to find a combination of operations that results in 10. Here's how I can approach it:
1. First, I notice that one of the numbers is already 10, so perhaps I can use it directly or combine it with other numbers to cancel out their effects.
2.... | <answer>10</answer> | [
{
"content": "Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answer is a series of arithmetic operations (+, -, *, /) that results in the target number.\n\nWrite the final answer in <final_answer> </final_answer> tags.\nFor the final answer, make sure that each step in the fi... | false | Expected a single '=' separating expression and result | answer_verification | How many times does the following reasoning trace propose a final answer then verify it or double check it? Provide a number that shows how many times the model proposed the final answer (double checking the final answer means you are proposing a final answer). It may repeat the final answer (verification) or derive a... | 65 | 10 | To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in the reasoning trace where the model either: explicitly computes and presents a final result, restates or confirms that same result, or attempts to verify it using an alternative method. Let’s step through the trace. The model propo... | [
"10",
"10",
"10",
"10",
"10",
"10",
"10",
"10",
"10",
"10"
] | null | 10 | Let's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an intermediate computation or reasoning step, excluding any full-problem re-evaluation or final answer re-check.
We look for moments where the model performs a subtask, suspects a mistake or ambiguity, and then double checks or redoes t... | [
"\"Wait, I think I made a mistake in step 2, let me recalculate the sum.\"",
"\"The calculated value seems off, I'll verify the multiplication again.\"",
"\"Just to be sure, I'll re-derive the formula from first principles.\"",
"\"The intermediate result was inconsistent, double checking the derivation.\"",
... | null | 10 | To answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoning (i.e., deliberates on whether the step or path it's currently pursuing is appropriate before either continuing or switching)—we need to identify all moments in the reasoning trace where:
- The model questions its current method or ... | [
"\"Is this the best way to approach this step? Maybe there's a more efficient path.\"",
"\"Before proceeding, I should consider if this assumption holds for all cases.\"",
"\"I wonder if switching methods here would simplify the problem.\"",
"\"Let's pause and check if continuing this way aligns with the prob... | null | [
true,
false,
true,
false,
false,
false,
true,
false,
false,
true
] | [
{
"error_explanation": "The previous step did not provide detailed computations, but gave an answer 10. Since the assistant now suspects there was an error in the sum in step 2, this means the incomplete previous answer could be wrong or partially incorrect. Hence, the error was that the intermediate calculatio... | [
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false
] | [
{
"correct": false,
"reasoning": "The solution provided is '10', which is not formatted as required by the question. The instructions clearly state that the answer must be a series of arithmetic operations, with each step written explicitly, for example: 'Step 1: number1 operator number2 = result', and the ... | [
false,
false,
false,
true,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false
] | [
{
"change_in_direction_explanation": "The deliberation introduces the possibility of exploring alternative methods before committing to a final answer, representing a meaningful reconsideration beyond the initial step.",
"deliberation": "Is this the best way to approach this step? Maybe there's a more effic... |
[{"content":"Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answ(...TRUNCATED) | [
9,
14,
11,
17
] | 14 | [{"content":"Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answ(...TRUNCATED) | "To create an equation that equals 14 using the numbers [9, 14, 11, 17], I need to use each number e(...TRUNCATED) | <answer>14</answer> | [{"content":"Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answ(...TRUNCATED) | false | Expected a single '=' separating expression and result | answer_verification | "How many times does the following reasoning trace propose a final answer then verify it or double c(...TRUNCATED) | 98 | 1 | "To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in the reason(...TRUNCATED) | [
"14"
] | null | 14 | "Let's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an intermediate c(...TRUNCATED) | ["\"Wait, I need to confirm whether the derivation for the integral bounds is correct. Let me re-der(...TRUNCATED) | null | 14 | "To answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoning (i.e., de(...TRUNCATED) | ["\"Is this the best approach to proceed or should I consider an alternative?\"","\"Perhaps checking(...TRUNCATED) | null | [
false,
true,
false,
false,
false,
true,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false
] | [{"error_explanation":"No previous derivation of integral bounds was provided in earlier steps, so t(...TRUNCATED) | [
false
] | [{"correct":false,"reasoning":"The solution provided is simply '14' which does not follow the requir(...TRUNCATED) | [
false,
true,
false,
true,
false,
true,
true,
true,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false
] | [{"change_in_direction_explanation":"The deliberation questioned the approach but ultimately the mod(...TRUNCATED) |
[{"content":"Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answ(...TRUNCATED) | [
11,
8,
9,
13
] | 17 | [{"content":"Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answ(...TRUNCATED) | "To reach the target number 17 using the numbers [11, 8, 9, 13], I need to find a combination of ope(...TRUNCATED) | "<answer>\n(13 + 9) - (11 + 8) = 3\n</answer>\n\nAfter many attempts, it appears that it's not possi(...TRUNCATED) | [{"content":"Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answ(...TRUNCATED) | false | Incorrect final answer | answer_verification | "How many times does the following reasoning trace propose a final answer then verify it or double c(...TRUNCATED) | 30 | 2 | "To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in the reason(...TRUNCATED) | [
"3",
"19"
] | null | 0 | "Let's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an intermediate c(...TRUNCATED) | [] | null | 1 | "To answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoning (i.e., de(...TRUNCATED) | ["After many attempts, it appears that it's not possible to reach the target number 17 using the num(...TRUNCATED) | null | [] | [] | [
false,
false
] | [{"correct":false,"reasoning":"The solution provided is simply '3', which does not follow the format(...TRUNCATED) | [
false
] | [{"change_in_direction_explanation":"The deliberation did not change the direction; it reaffirmed th(...TRUNCATED) |
[{"content":"Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answ(...TRUNCATED) | [
19,
2,
12,
18
] | 13 | [{"content":"Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answ(...TRUNCATED) | "To reach the target number 13 using the numbers [19, 2, 12, 18], I need to find a combination of op(...TRUNCATED) | "<answer>\n(19 - (18 - 12)) = 13\n</answer>\n\nNote: The answer above does not use all the numbers ((...TRUNCATED) | [{"content":"Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answ(...TRUNCATED) | true | null | answer_verification | "How many times does the following reasoning trace propose a final answer then verify it or double c(...TRUNCATED) | 66 | 1 | "To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in the reason(...TRUNCATED) | [
"13"
] | null | 0 | "Let's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an intermediate c(...TRUNCATED) | [] | null | 1 | "To answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoning (i.e., de(...TRUNCATED) | ["Note: The answer above does not use all the numbers (2 is unused). After thorough testing, it appe(...TRUNCATED) | null | [] | [] | [
false
] | [{"correct":false,"reasoning":"The question asks for a step-by-step solution using the given numbers(...TRUNCATED) | [
true
] | [{"change_in_direction_explanation":"The deliberation explicitly considers an alternative approach(...TRUNCATED) |
[{"content":"Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answ(...TRUNCATED) | [
16,
4,
1,
21
] | 16 | [{"content":"Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answ(...TRUNCATED) | "To create an equation that equals 16 using the numbers [16, 4, 1, 21], I need to consider the opera(...TRUNCATED) | <answer>16</answer> | [{"content":"Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answ(...TRUNCATED) | false | Expected a single '=' separating expression and result | answer_verification | "How many times does the following reasoning trace propose a final answer then verify it or double c(...TRUNCATED) | 95 | 1 | "To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in the reason(...TRUNCATED) | [
"16"
] | null | 0 | "Let's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an intermediate c(...TRUNCATED) | [] | null | 16 | "To answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoning (i.e., de(...TRUNCATED) | ["\"Wait, maybe I should consider a different approach here—this might be more efficient.\"","\"On(...TRUNCATED) | null | [] | [] | [
false
] | [{"correct":false,"reasoning":"The solution provided is just the number '16' with no steps or arithm(...TRUNCATED) | [
false,
true,
false,
true,
true,
false,
true,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false
] | [{"change_in_direction_explanation":"The deliberation proposes considering a different approach inst(...TRUNCATED) |
[{"content":"Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answ(...TRUNCATED) | [
20,
11,
16,
1
] | 16 | [{"content":"Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answ(...TRUNCATED) | "To solve this problem, I need to use the numbers [20, 11, 16, 1] exactly once with basic arithmetic(...TRUNCATED) | <answer>16</answer> | [{"content":"Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answ(...TRUNCATED) | false | Expected a single '=' separating expression and result | answer_verification | "How many times does the following reasoning trace propose a final answer then verify it or double c(...TRUNCATED) | 14 | 16 | "To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in the reason(...TRUNCATED) | [] | null | 16 | "Let's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an intermediate c(...TRUNCATED) | ["\"Wait, I think I made a mistake in calculating this step, let me check again...\"","\"Let me re-c(...TRUNCATED) | null | 16 | "To answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoning (i.e., de(...TRUNCATED) | ["\"Is this approach the best way to tackle this problem or should I try an alternative method?\"","(...TRUNCATED) | null | [
true,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false
] | [{"error_explanation":"The previous step simply stated '16' without showing a valid equation or calc(...TRUNCATED) | [] | [] | [
false,
false,
true,
false,
false,
true,
true,
false,
false,
false,
false,
false,
true,
false,
false,
false,
false
] | [{"change_in_direction_explanation":"The deliberation did not change the direction. The assistant co(...TRUNCATED) |
[{"content":"Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answ(...TRUNCATED) | [
15,
19,
9
] | 13 | [{"content":"Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answ(...TRUNCATED) | "To solve this problem, I need to use the numbers 15, 19, and 9 with basic arithmetic operations (+,(...TRUNCATED) | <answer>
Step 1: 15 - 9 = 6
Step 2: 19 - 6 = 13
</answer> | [{"content":"Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answ(...TRUNCATED) | true | null | answer_verification | "How many times does the following reasoning trace propose a final answer then verify it or double c(...TRUNCATED) | 0 | 1 | "To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in the reason(...TRUNCATED) | [
"13"
] | null | 0 | "Let's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an intermediate c(...TRUNCATED) | [] | null | 0 | "To answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoning (i.e., de(...TRUNCATED) | [] | null | [] | [] | [
false
] | [{"correct":false,"reasoning":"The solution provided is simply '13', which does not comply with the (...TRUNCATED) | [] | [] |
[{"content":"Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answ(...TRUNCATED) | [
13,
3,
18,
10
] | 24 | [{"content":"Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answ(...TRUNCATED) | "To solve this problem, I need to use the numbers [13, 3, 18, 10] exactly once with basic arithmetic(...TRUNCATED) | <final_answer>
Step 1: 18 - 10 = 8
Step 2: 13 + 3 = 16
Step 3: 16 + 8 = 24
</final_answer> | [{"content":"Solve the problem step by step. Write your thoughts in <think> </think> tags.\nThe answ(...TRUNCATED) | true | null | answer_verification | "How many times does the following reasoning trace propose a final answer then verify it or double c(...TRUNCATED) | 2 | 3 | "To determine how many times the model proposed a final answer, we look for each point in the reason(...TRUNCATED) | [
"8",
"16",
"24"
] | null | 0 | "Let's step through the reasoning trace to count how many times the model verifies an intermediate c(...TRUNCATED) | [] | null | 0 | "To answer your question—how many times does the model verify its higher-level reasoning (i.e., de(...TRUNCATED) | [] | null | [] | [] | [
false,
false,
false
] | [{"correct":false,"reasoning":"The user's question asks to create an equation using the numbers [13,(...TRUNCATED) | [] | [] |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 4