text stringlengths 332 3.61k | label int64 0 12 |
|---|---|
65. The applicant submitted that, in view of the grave danger to life which an enforced disappearance involved and the urgent need to locate the person, the authorities' failure to initiate a prompt and effective investigation into the disappearance of his son had directly endangered his son's life and constituted a v... | 4 |
87. The applicants Sonia Biga, Augustin Biga, Carol Ciorcan, Sorin Ciorcan, Costel Ciorcan, Edith Csiki (Biga) and Ildiko Kalanyos (Biga), namely the sons and daughters of the deceased Susana Ciorcan, complained that the State agents had used excessive force against their mother, which had put her life in danger, and ... | 4 |
67. The applicants complained, under Article <mask> of the Convention, that the use of force employed by the security forces against İsmet Erdoğan and Elmas Yalçın was disproportionate and resulted in their unlawful killing. They further complained, under the same head, that the investigation and the subsequent crimin... | 4 |
46. The applicant submitted that the procedural obligation under Article <mask> of the Convention concerned all aspects of an incident involving the unlawful killing of a citizen by a State agent. That Article imposed a duty on the State to carry out an effective investigation into allegations of abuse of power by the... | 4 |
45. The Government, referring to the case of Caraher v. the United Kingdom ((dec.), no. 24520/94, ECHR 2000‑I), submitted that applicants who had received compensation for the breach of their Convention rights could no longer claim to be victims of a violation. The possibility of obtaining compensation for the death o... | 4 |
40. The applicant complained that the State authorities were responsible for the accident of 30 November 1998 and had violated her daughter's right to life. She also complained that the State authorities had failed to investigate the accident of 30 November 1998 effectively and to punish those responsible for it. In t... | 4 |
65. The Government argued that the applicant had failed to exhaust the domestic remedies with regard to her complaint under Article <mask> of the Convention. Firstly, she had not started separate civil proceedings against the State, which she should have done if she considered that its authorities, including the polic... | 4 |
58. The applicant complained about the death of her son, Yevgeniy Geppa, while he was serving his prison sentence. She alleged that his death was caused by a combination of regular beatings by the colony officials, a lack of medical care in respect of the injuries sustained, and his previously acquired medical conditi... | 4 |
83. The Government attributed the delay in commencing the investigation to the applicants arguing that the first applicant had filed a complaint with the city prosecutor’s office only on 5 August 2002. The Court considers in this respect that the issue of whether members of Aslanbek Khamzayev’s family or others have l... | 4 |
162. The applicant alleged that her husband had been tortured and killed, following his abduction by agents of the State, and that the authorities had failed to carry out an effective and adequate investigation into his killing. She made these claims on behalf of her late husband and, as indirect victims, on behalf of... | 4 |
100. The applicants submitted that the refusal to allow them to use the product had been in breach of their right to life. They highlighted the similarities and differences between their case and previous cases in which the Court had dealt with complaints under Article <mask> of the Convention in relation to health ca... | 4 |
53. The applicant disputed that objection. In her view, the fact that the investigation had been ongoing for seven years with no tangible results proved that it was an ineffective remedy in this case. She further claimed that she could not effectively challenge actions or omissions of the investigating authorities bec... | 4 |
28. The applicants emphasised that twenty-six years after the death of their relatives, the related criminal investigation had still not identified those responsible and sent them for trial. They submitted that the duration of the investigation had been excessive and that the authorities had not complied with the requ... | 4 |
52. The applicants complained that the authorities had not taken appropriate and adequate steps to investigate the death of their parents and to bring the perpetrators to justice. They also claimed that their parents had been killed because of their Croatian ethnic origin and that the national authorities had failed t... | 4 |
58. The Government denied the factual basis of the applicant’s allegation under Article <mask> of the Convention. They submitted that Mehmet Şah Şeker was not taken into custody by the police as alleged. They contended that there was no reason to arrest the applicant’s son since he had not been involved in any crimina... | 4 |
154. The Government contended on one hand that Article <mask> of the Convention was not applicable to the applicants’ complaints concerning the disappearance of their relatives and that their complaints under this head must be examined under Article 5 of the Convention. To this end they referred to the case of Kurt v.... | 4 |
77. The applicants complained under Article <mask> of the Convention that their relatives had been deliberately killed by the security forces and that the authorities had failed to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances of their deaths. The applicants also maintained that they had not been provide... | 4 |
27. The applicant submitted that he had exhausted the domestic remedies available to him and that he had lodged the complaint with the Court within the time-limit set by Article 35 § 1. He made reference to the Court’s case-law in this regard, with particular emphasis on the Court’s approach to applying the rule of ex... | 4 |
31. The applicants complained that the authorities had not taken appropriate and adequate steps to investigate the death of J.T. and to bring the perpetrators to justice. They also claimed that J.T. had been killed because of his Serbian ethnic origin and that the national authorities had failed to investigate that fa... | 4 |
64. The Government pointed out that the remedies to be exhausted under the Convention included not only judicial ones, but also administrative ones. The Court had taken into account police inquiries in the “TRNC” in cases similar to the present one and had examined whether such investigations were effective and suffic... | 4 |
36. The applicant alleged that the death of his son had been caused by an excessive use of force. In his view, domestic law did not regulate, in a manner that was compatible with the Convention, the use of firearms by State agents. The latter had allegedly been authorised to use lethal force against his son without it... | 4 |
107. The Government submitted that the first head of claim was exorbitant and far above the awards made by the Court in previous cases in which it had found breaches of Article <mask> of the Convention due to actions of the police. The second head of claim was likewise exorbitant. In the Government’s view, in the pres... | 4 |
137. The applicant submitted that her son, Said-Khuseyn Imakayev, was detained by servicemen on 17 December 2000 and that he was killed by servicemen in circumstances that lacked any justification under Article <mask> of the Convention. She based this assertion on the circumstances surrounding his detention, the fact ... | 4 |
43. The Government finally reiterated that an effective investigation implied an obligation of means and not of result. In their view, in the present case the investigation authorities had taken all possible steps for the investigation into the applicant’s wife’s death to be an effective one. Therefore, there was no b... | 4 |
125. The Government have referred to the fact that there are pending civil proceedings which the applicant is not taking steps to expedite. While, civil proceedings would provide a judicial fact finding forum, with the attendant safeguards and the ability to reach findings of unlawfulness, with the possibility of an a... | 4 |
161. The applicant maintained that, at the time of lodging her application with the Court, she had not been certain of her husband's fate or the identity of the body found in Tarashcha. Therefore, she had based her complaint on his disappearance. Whilst she no longer claimed that her husband had disappeared, she alleg... | 4 |
33. The applicants complained under Article <mask> of the Convention that Ms Aleksandrovich had died as a result of intentional mistreatment in the police custody and that the State authorities had not discharged their obligations to provide medical treatment for her and to undertake a thorough and effective investiga... | 4 |
43. The applicant complained of the lack of protection of the unborn child under French criminal law and argued that the State had failed to discharge its obligations under Article <mask> of the Convention by not allowing the offence of unintentional homicide to cover injury to an unborn child. She further submitted t... | 4 |
283. The applicants further submitted that Article <mask> of the Convention should not be understood as outlawing only deliberate homicide; there did not exist a right or authorisation to take somebody’s life under any circumstances. The death in question should engage the responsibility of the State irrespective of t... | 4 |
28. The applicant complained under Articles 2, 3 and 8 of the Convention that the inquiry into the circumstances leading to the serious deterioration of her health was not effective. Regard being had to the seriousness of the applicant’s condition and the damage to her health, the Court will examine her grievances fro... | 4 |
279. The Government submitted that there had been no violation of Article <mask> of the Convention given that, firstly, the results of the meticulous investigation of the case conducted by the relevant domestic authorities had established that the life of the applicants’ son had not been taken “intentionally”, within ... | 4 |
153. The Government, referring to the Court’s case-law (Byrzykowski v. Poland, no. 11562/05, § 104, 27 June 2006; Eugenia Lazăr v. Romania, no. 32146/05, §§ 68-72, 16 February 2010; Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 130, ECHR 2014; and Powell v. the United Kingd... | 4 |
120. The applicants claimed 30,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage as regards the complaint under Article <mask> of the Convention; EUR 10,000 as regards the complaint under Article 5 of the Convention; EUR 10,000 each as regards the complaint under Article 3 of the Convention; and EUR 12,000 as regards... | 4 |
150. The applicant maintained that the imposition and/or execution of the death penalty constituted a violation of Article <mask> of the Convention – which should be interpreted as no longer permitting capital punishment – as well as an inhuman and degrading punishment in violation of Article 3. He also claimed that h... | 4 |
22. The applicants complained that the authorities had not taken appropriate and adequate steps to investigate P.M.’s death and bring his killers to justice. They also submitted that P.M. had been killed because he was of Serbian ethnic origin and that the national authorities had failed to investigate that factor. Th... | 4 |
51. The applicant contended that Mr Khanpasha Dzhabrailov could be presumed dead, given that he had been taken away in life-threatening circumstances, that he had remained missing for several years and that there had been no news of him since the date when he was abducted. She submitted that the Government had advance... | 4 |
86. The applicant argued that there could be no reasonable doubt that State servicemen had been responsible for the killing of her relatives, in breach of Article <mask> of the Convention. She relied on numerous documents submitted to the Court in the course of the present case and other cases which supported this all... | 4 |
104. The applicant thus stressed that her husband had been apprehended in life-endangering circumstances and argued, relying on Article <mask> of the Convention, that the fact that he had remained missing since 29 April 2001 proved that he had been killed. She also claimed that the special operation carried out on the... | 4 |
85. The applicant submitted that the obligation to protect the right to life under Article <mask> of the Convention, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 to secure to everyone within its jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in the Convention, established a positive obligation on St... | 4 |
28. The applicant complained under Article <mask> of the Convention that he had been the victim of a life-threatening action taken by R.D., a State official. He also complained under Article 6 that the domestic courts had failed to recognise the State’s responsibility. The Court, being the master of the characterisati... | 4 |
37. The Government acknowledged a violation of the substantive aspect of Article <mask> of the Convention, stating that “a violation of Shamkhan Abubakarov and Badrudi Abubakarov’s right to life guaranteed by Article 2 of the Convention is confirmed by the criminal case material”. They further contended that the inves... | 4 |
114. The applicant complained that the authorities had failed to carry out an effective investigation into her son’s death. She claimed, in particular, that she had been excluded from the investigation at its initial stage as a result of the investigator’s refusal to grant her victim status, and that, even after the d... | 4 |
71. The applicant argued that he had exhausted all domestic remedies. He pointed out that he had had two sets of proceedings at his disposal – civil and criminal – and that he had opted for criminal proceedings. He noted that after the death of his sister he had suffered profound grief that could only have been allevi... | 4 |
29. The applicants made a twofold complaint under Article <mask> of the Convention. They contended firstly that the State had failed to comply with their positive obligations in order to prevent the deaths of M.T. and V.T. and secondly that the State had failed to conduct a thorough investigation into the possible res... | 4 |
60. The Government contested that argument. They submitted that there was no evidence proving the State agents’ involvement into the killing as “nothing in the present case speaks of a possible violation of Article <mask> of the Convention in its substantive limb”. They further contended that the investigation into th... | 4 |
80. The Government also contended that the investigation of A.Č.’s death had complied with the State’s obligations under Article <mask> of the Convention. The criminal investigation had been promptly opened upon the prosecutor’s initiative. The applicant and his wife had been involved in the proceedings. Although the ... | 4 |
115. The Government submitted that, as was clear from the results of the domestic investigation, Private Alekseyev had died of a stab wound that he had inflicted on himself with a bayonet, which had constituted suicide. At the same time, the materials obtained by the investigation, including statements of numerous wit... | 4 |
43. The applicant complained that if extradited to Belarus he could be subjected to capital punishment contrary to Article <mask> of the Convention. He further complained under Article 3 of the Convention that there was a risk of his being subjected to torture and inhuman and degrading treatment by the Belarusian law-... | 4 |
63. The applicant further maintained that the State agents had deliberately and unlawfully prevented timely medical aid from being given to her and her husband, despite the serious injuries they had suffered. Due to the Government’s failure to provide the entire criminal investigation file to the Court, the burden of ... | 4 |
68. The applicants argued that the investigation into the killings of their relatives was neither impartial nor adequate for the purposes of the requirements of Article <mask> of the Convention. In this connection, the applicants submitted, in particular, that the autopsy had not established which specific weapon had ... | 4 |
52. The Government argued that there were no grounds to hold the State responsible for the alleged violations of Article <mask> of the Convention in the present case. They contended that there was no conclusive evidence that the applicant’s son was dead, as his corpse had never been found, and that the investigation h... | 4 |
14. The applicants complained that the domestic authorities have not carried out within a reasonable time an effective investigation into the events of December 1989 occurred in Bucharest, Brașov and Vișina, during which they were injured or their close relatives were killed by gunfire. They relied on Article <mask> o... | 4 |
29. The applicant also complained under Article <mask> of the Convention about the allegedly inadequate investigation of the death of Ms P. Referring to Article 6 §§ 1, 2 and 3 (a), (b), as well as Article 13 of the Convention, he further complained about the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings against him.... | 4 |
143. The Government maintained that the prosecutor had conducted an investigation which was in compliance with the requirements of Article <mask> of the Convention and that in doing so he had not ignored any small detail or evidence and had conducted the entire investigation swiftly, completing it within one year. In ... | 4 |
112. The Government argued that the circumstances of the attack of 12 September 1999 had been duly investigated by the domestic authorities, which, having carried out the investigation, had decided to discontinue the criminal proceedings “in the absence of any lawful grounds for holding anyone criminally liable”. The ... | 4 |
70. The Government argued that the investigation into the disappearance of the applicant’s son met the Convention requirement of effectiveness, as all measures envisaged in national law were being taken to find Mr Khanpasha Dzhabrailov and to identify those responsible. They submitted that the investigation was being ... | 4 |
56. The applicant complained firstly of acts of torture inflicted on her husband by the authorities responsible for his custody and which led to his death in 1980. Secondly, she complained of various shortcomings in the criminal proceedings which came to an end in 2003, resulting in the de facto impunity granted to he... | 4 |
139. The applicants submitted that there was overwhelming evidence to conclude that their relatives had been intentionally deprived of their lives in circumstances that violated Article <mask> of the Convention. Basing themselves on the Government's admission that on 5 February 2000 a special operation had been carrie... | 4 |
36. The applicant further complained under Article <mask> of the Convention about ineffective investigation into the accident and insufficient funding of his medical, educational, rehabilitation, and other needs and under Article 13 of the Convention about lack of the effective remedies in this regard. Lastly he compl... | 4 |
57. The Government contended that the applicant could no longer be considered a “victim” of a violation of Article <mask> of the Convention, within the meaning of Article 34, since the authorities had acknowledged the breach and afforded him redress. The case was therefore inadmissible as incompatible ratione personae... | 4 |
221. The Government submitted that the investigation into the death of the applicants’ son had fully met the requirements of impartiality and thoroughness, as required by Article <mask> of the Convention. The obligation to conduct that investigation was one of means only, not of result. As regards impartiality, they a... | 4 |
51. The Government argued that the applicant did not have an arguable claim of a violation of Article <mask> of the Convention. She was not suggesting that the medical personnel knew or ought to have known of a risk of suicide but rather, as alleged before the County Court, that they had been negligent in their assess... | 4 |
50. The applicants argued that the force used by the soldiers against their two relatives had not been absolutely necessary and that the excessive nature of the use of force showed that the soldiers had in fact intended to kill them. Indeed, the conclusion reached by the three experts appointed by the military prosecu... | 4 |
46. The applicant complained of a violation of the right to life in respect of her son, Mr Khanpasha Dzhabrailov. She submitted that the circumstances of his disappearance and the long period during which it had not been possible to establish his whereabouts indicated that Mr Khanpasha Dzhabrailov had been killed by r... | 4 |
46. The Government added that limitation periods were the strongest possible affirmation of the right to a speedy and equitable trial, as they prevented undue delays before conviction and expired when it was no longer imperative for a sentence to be imposed for the purposes of retribution, deterrence and rehabilitatio... | 4 |
98. The Government contested, firstly, the applicability of Article 13, disputing that the applicant had an arguable claim of a violation of Article <mask> of the Convention. In this connection, they relied on the Commission's finding, which was endorsed by the Court above, that it had not been established beyond reas... | 4 |
56. The Government relied on the information provided by the Prosecutor General's Office and argued that the Russian authorities were not responsible for the actions of unidentified persons who had abducted Vakhid Musikhanov. In their submission, there was no evidence in the materials of the criminal investigation fil... | 4 |
68. The applicant alleged that his brother had been tortured and killed following his abduction by undercover agents of the State or by persons acting under their express or implicit instructions. He also complained that the authorities had failed to carry out an effective and adequate investigation into his brother's... | 4 |
79. The Government observed that the investigation and criminal proceedings had constituted an effective domestic remedy for the applicant’s complaints under Article <mask> of the Convention. If she found them to be inadequate, she was able to, and did, lodge respective complaints with the prosecutors or a domestic co... | 4 |
111. The applicant further complained under Article <mask> of the Convention that her son’s life was in peril; under Article 3 of the Convention that she had been subjected to degrading treatment while waiting in queues to get into the circuit bailiffs’ office premises; and under Article 10 of the Convention that jour... | 4 |
94. The Government argued that the investigation had not obtained any evidence to the effect that representatives of the Russian federal forces had been involved in the abduction of Abu Khasuyev. They argued therefore that there were no grounds to claim that Abu Khasuyev’s right to life, guaranteed by Article <mask> o... | 4 |
31. The applicants argued that the Russian authorities had failed to establish the circumstances of Mr Antonov’s death and, as a result, had not fulfilled the obligations imposed on them by Article 2. In their opinion, there had been sufficient evidence to show that Mr Antonov had not hanged himself and that he had be... | 4 |
108. The Government submitted no comments on the issue of compensation being paid to twelve applicants. On the other hand, they agreed that, should the Court find violations of Article <mask> of the Convention in the present case, the applicants could be awarded just satisfaction, with the exception of the applicants ... | 4 |
69. The Government submitted that, in having instituted a criminal investigation into Ayub Salatkhanov’s murder, the Russian authorities had admitted that there had been a violation of his right to life. However, the violation had been the result of the actions of a particular individual and not of State agencies. The... | 4 |
64. The Government contended that the national authorities had complied with their procedural obligation under Article <mask> of the Convention. The applicants’ parents had been killed in territory outside the control of the Croatian authorities. Once those authorities had regained control over the territory, an inve... | 4 |
102. The applicant submitted that the criminal investigations in the case had not been conducted efficiently, as required by the Court’s case-law under Article <mask> of the Convention. The authorities had failed to take appropriate measures in order to establish the circumstances of his wife’s death. The investigatio... | 4 |
64. The applicants complained of a violation of the right to life in respect of their close relative, Isa Zaurbekov. They submitted that the circumstances of his disappearance and the long period during which it had not been possible to establish his whereabouts indicated that Isa Zaurbekov had been killed by the fede... | 4 |
108. The Government submitted that a legal distinction should be drawn between two situations: one in which a violation of the Convention occurred during a period falling outside the Court’s temporal jurisdiction, and a second in which a violation of the Convention “did not legally exist at all” because at the materia... | 4 |
56. The Government argued that the applicant had failed to prove he had actually sustained pecuniary damage. They also averred that the non‑pecuniary damage should be limited to the object of the case, that is, Article <mask> of the Convention, and considered that the amount requested by the applicant was excessive. I... | 5 |
55. The Government submitted that the penalties imposed on the three officers had been proportionate and fully in line with the requirements of Article <mask> of the Convention. The authorities had first carried out a prompt and effective investigation. They had gathered and duly assessed all relevant evidence, and ha... | 5 |
106. The applicant complained that the unlawful taking and demolition of his house, accompanied by pressure and threats by government officials, had amounted to ill-treatment under Article <mask> of the Convention. He further complained that his eviction from his house and forcible removal to the new flat given to him... | 5 |
34. The applicant further complained under Article 2 § 1 of the Convention on account of the outcome of the proceedings instituted in 1996. Under the same heading, she alleged a violation on account of the events that allegedly took place on 13 September 1995 and 15 April 1997. Additionally, she claimed a violation of... | 5 |
327. The applicants alleged that the lack of immediate assistance after Carlo Giuliani had fallen to the ground and the jeep had driven over his body had contributed to his death and amounted to inhuman treatment. They referred to paragraphs 5 and 8 of the UN Principles (see paragraph 154 above) and relied on Article ... | 5 |
83. The Government went on to observe that, in an order of 7 April 2010, the Varna regional public prosecutor’s office had decided not to commence criminal proceedings against the police officers who had entered the applicants’ home. The prosecuting authorities had noted, inter alia, that the police officers’ actions ... | 5 |
41. The applicant complained that his prolonged detention on remand in poor conditions, leading to liver disease and tuberculosis, had amounted to treatment contrary to Article <mask> of the Convention. Before he had been sent to a prison to serve his punishment, he had been kept in detention on remand for about three... | 5 |
104. The applicant maintained that he had suffered severe mental distress and anguish falling within the scope of Article <mask> of the Convention on account of the fact that for several months he had had no information about his son and that his attempts to find Aslanbek Kukayev and later to have his death investigat... | 5 |
106. The applicant referred to the relevant case-law of the Court arguing that he had not had a fair trial, because his conviction had been based on unlawfully obtained evidence, namely his statement of 16 August 2005 obtained in violation of his rights under Article <mask> of the Convention. Despite the fact that the... | 5 |
21. The applicant submitted that the prolonged imposition of the “dangerous detainee” regime had been in breach of Article <mask> of the Convention. In his opinion, there had been no reasonable grounds for applying the regime to him. He contested the allegation that he had been the leader of a collective protest. He h... | 5 |
52. The Government asserted that the applicant’s asylum claim had been examined in substance at two levels of jurisdiction based on extensive country reports that allowed for an evaluation of the security and human rights situation in the country of origin. The Federal Asylum Office and the Asylum Court had both thoro... | 5 |
40. The Government argued that the alleged ill-treatment did not fall within the ambit of Article <mask> of the Convention as it had not attained a minimum level of severity. They further stated that the said treatment had not been proven beyond reasonable doubt as pointed out by the 19th Chamber of the Ankara Crimina... | 5 |
135. The applicant submitted that she had reasons to believe that Mr Sultan Isayev had been subjected to treatment contrary to Article <mask> of the Convention following his arrest and that there had been no effective investigation into the matter. The applicant also complained that she had suffered severe mental dist... | 5 |
29. The applicant complained under Article <mask> of the Convention of his alleged ill-treatment in custody. He further complained under the same provision and under Article 13 of the Convention that the investigation into his complaints had not been thorough as its conclusions had been based on the statements of the ... | 5 |
76. The applicant complained of a violation of both the material and procedural aspects of Article <mask> of the Convention in relation to her son. The Court reiterates that allegations of ill-treatment must be supported by appropriate evidence. To assess this evidence, the Court adopts the standard of proof “beyond r... | 5 |
55. The Government have not sought to invoke convincing security reasons requiring the applicant’s isolation and have not said why it was not possible to revise his regime so as to permit adequate possibilities for human contact and meaningful occupation outside the cell. It appears also that this situation is to a gr... | 5 |
105. The applicant submitted that despite numerous complaints to the SIZO administration regarding his medical condition, he had had no medical assistance between 26 February and 21 March 2008. On 21 March 2008 he had been examined by a SIZO general practitioner for the first time, yet the doctor had only given him an... | 5 |
70. The applicant submitted that the proceedings against the police officers had been flawed in several respects. The courts had failed to convict the officers and had rejected his civil claim despite the availability of clear and overwhelming evidence of the unjustified use of force against him. The courts had also f... | 5 |
75. The applicant claimed 113,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage, consisting of EUR 100,000 for the breach of his rights guaranteed by Article <mask> of the Convention, EUR 7,000 for the breach of his rights guaranteed by Article 5, EUR 1,000 for the breach of his rights guaranteed by Article 6 and EUR... | 5 |
38. The applicant complained that the refusal to grant him drug substitution therapy in prison, which had made him suffer considerable pain and had caused damage to his health, and the refusal to have the necessity of drug substitution therapy examined by an external medical expert amounted to inhuman treatment. He re... | 5 |
26. The Government submitted that the applicant had not exhausted all the domestic remedies available to him. In particular, they maintained that he did not make use of the provisions of the Constitution and the Civil Code to claim compensation for the alleged poor conditions of detention. Moreover, he could have invo... | 5 |
44. The applicant complained that, taking into account the conditions created in the punishment cell in Grīva Prison while he was under the disciplinary penalty imposed on him on 5 September 2000, he had been subjected to inhuman treatment and torture. He furthermore alleged that there had been no effective investigat... | 5 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.