license: apache-2.0
task_categories:
- text-generation
- question-answering
- other
language:
- en
tags:
- benchmark
- leaderboard
- agent-benchmark
- llm-benchmark
- web-agents
- browser-agent
- browser-automation
- ai-agent
- evaluation
- real-world-tasks
- web-navigation
- task-completion
- clawbench
- multimodal
pretty_name: 'ClawBench: Web Agent Benchmark'
size_categories:
- n<1K
configs:
- config_name: default
data_files:
- split: test
path: data/train-00000-of-00001.parquet
arxiv: '2604.08523'
viewer: true
leaderboard: NAIL-Group/clawbench-leaderboard
ClawBench — A Benchmark for AI Web Agents
Can AI Agents Complete Everyday Online Tasks?
|💻 Github | 🏆 Leaderboard | 📖 Paper | 🌐 Website |
ClawBench is an open benchmark for AI web agents — the systems that drive a real browser to complete a user's task end-to-end. It scores agents on real, everyday online tasks (booking flights, ordering groceries, submitting job applications) across live websites. The corpus ships in two slices: V1 — 153 tasks across 144 websites (the original frontier-model leaderboard) and V2 — 130 newer tasks (expanded coverage). For each run we capture 5 layers of behavioral data (session replay, screenshots, HTTP traffic, agent reasoning traces, and browser actions), collect human ground-truth, and score with an agentic evaluator that provides step-level traceable diagnostics.
Install: pip install clawbench-eval (PyPI) · Companion raw traces: NAIL-Group/ClawBenchV1Trace
🏆 Leaderboard
Live results — pulled from leaderboard/results.csv in this repo. Sort by corpus (v1 / v2 / all) and submit your model in the interactive Space:
Snapshot — last refreshed 2026-05-10:
| Rank | Model | Harness | Corpus | Pass | Total | Pass Rate | Wall (h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | glm-5.1 |
hermes | v2 | 63 | 130 | 48.46% | 11.35 |
| 2 | glm-5.1 |
hermes | v1 | 25 | 153 | 16.34% | 15.37 |
| 3 | openrouter/owl-alpha |
hermes | v2 | 19 | 130 | 14.62% | 7.58 |
| 4 | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash |
hermes | v1 | 14 | 153 | 9.15% | 13.59 |
| 5 | glm-5.1 |
openclaw | v1 | 13 | 153 | 8.50% | 6.50 |
| 6 | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash |
hermes | v2 | 4 | 130 | 3.08% | 2.37 |
| 7 | poolside/laguna-m.1:free |
hermes | v1 | 1 | 153 | 0.65% | 1.52 |
Submit a result → run clawbench-eval on your model and open a PR to leaderboard/results.csv — one row per (model × harness × corpus).
Companion dataset (raw traces):
NAIL-Group/ClawBenchV1Trace—recording.mp4,requests.jsonl,actions.jsonl,agent-messages.jsonl,interception.json,run-meta.jsonper V1 model run.
Dataset Structure
Columns
| Column | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
task_id |
int | Unique task identifier |
instruction |
string | Task prompt sent to the agent |
metaclass |
string | High-level category (21 categories) |
class |
string | Fine-grained sub-category |
platform |
string | Target platform (144 unique platforms) |
sites |
list[string] | Domains involved in the task |
eval_schema |
string (JSON) | Request interception configuration |
time_limit |
int | Maximum time in minutes |
extra_info |
string (JSON) | Paths to additional context files |
shared_info |
string | Path to shared user profile |
Additional Files
shared/
alex_green_personal_info.json # Shared dummy user profile used across all tasks
extra_info/
004/grocery_list.json # Task-specific context (32 tasks have extra info)
007/meal_plan.json
043/pet_info.json
...
shared/alex_green_personal_info.json— A comprehensive dummy user persona (Alex Green) including personal details, address, work history, education, financial information, and preferences. All tasks share this identity.extra_info/— Task-specific supplementary files referenced by theextra_infocolumn. 32 of 153 tasks include additional context such as grocery lists, job links, meeting details, etc.
eval_schema
The eval_schema field configures the request interceptor — a mechanism that blocks the final HTTP request matching the specified URL pattern and method, preventing irreversible actions (checkout, form submission, etc.) from reaching the server. This allows safe evaluation on live websites.
{
"url_pattern": "taskrabbit\\.(com|ca)/(api/v\\d+/jobs|book/\\d+/confirm)",
"method": "POST"
}
Task Categories (metaclass)
| Category | Tasks | Example Platforms |
|---|---|---|
| daily-life | 21 | Uber Eats, Instacart, Zillow |
| entertainment-hobbies | 15 | Goodreads, Eventbrite, Fandango |
| creation-init | 13 | ClickUp, Typeform, Ghost |
| office-secretary-tasks | 9 | Trello, Calendly, Purelymail |
| rating-voting | 10 | TripAdvisor, Glassdoor, Yelp |
| education-learning | 9 | Coursera, LeetCode, Blinkist |
| travel | 9 | Google Flights, Hipcamp, Airbnb |
| beauty-personal-care | 9 | TaskRabbit, Booksy, Soko Glam |
| pet-animal-care | 8 | Rover, Petfinder, Chewy |
| job-search-hr | 8 | Indeed, Greenhouse, ZipRecruiter |
| academia-research | 5 | Zotero, Overleaf, Google Scholar |
| and 10 more... |
Usage
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("NAIL-Group/ClawBench", split="test")
print(ds[0])
Citation
@article{zhang2026clawbench,
title={ClawBench: Can AI Agents Complete Everyday Online Tasks?},
author={Yuxuan Zhang and Yubo Wang and Yipeng Zhu and Penghui Du and Junwen Miao and Xuan Lu and Wendong Xu and Yunzhuo Hao and Songcheng Cai and Xiaochen Wang and Huaisong Zhang and Xian Wu and Yi Lu and Minyi Lei and Kai Zou and Huifeng Yin and Ping Nie and Liang Chen and Dongfu Jiang and Wenhu Chen and Kelsey R. Allen},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.08523},
year={2026}
}