The dataset viewer is not available for this dataset.
Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
- 1. What this is (and what it replaces)
- 2. Pipeline phases — planned vs. delivered
- Phase 0 — Audit & leakage-proof re-split (
clean_sumtablets.py) ✅ - Phase 1 — Image elevation (
phase1_images.py) ✅ complete - Phase 2 — Task architecture (
phase2_tasks.py+mixer_config.yaml) ✅ - Phase 3 — Translation layer (
phase3_translations.py) ✅ - Phase 4 — External sign grounding (
phase4_grounding.py) ✅ - Phase 5 — Packaging (
phase5_package.py) ✅ - Phase 6 — Evaluation harness (
phase6_eval.py) ✅
- Phase 0 — Audit & leakage-proof re-split (
- 3. Measured baseline (zero-shot Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct)
- 4. Training path (first fine-tune: Qwen3-VL-4B)
- 5. Engineering log (what broke and what it taught)
- 6. Dataset structure
- 7. Validate it yourself
- 8. Status & roadmap
- 9. Licensing
- 10. Acknowledgements
- 11. Why Qwen3-VL?
Sumtablets-Cuneiform-Full-Fable5-Remaster — Cuneiform Vision-Language Training Dataset
A rebuilt, leakage-proof, multi-task training dataset for teaching vision-language models (target: Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct LoRA) to visually read, transliterate, and translate Sumerian cuneiform tablets from photographs. The mission: produce useful first-pass readings for the ~90% of excavated tablets that have never been published or translated.
Current release: v1.0.0 — 455,506 records (402,004 train / 24,507 validation / 24,446 test / 4,549 external grounding), built on 52,602 tablets with at least one tier-A/B image and 87,764 aligned surface-text pairs. Everything below is reproducible from the public pipeline in this repository.
AI disclosure: this dataset restructuring was designed, implemented, and executed by Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) operating the
Sumtablets_v2pipeline under human direction, with human review at the quality gates (segmentation review, pollution labeling, Gold-set approval). Every automated decision is recorded in per-phase manifests and reports so third parties can validate or contest it.
1. What this is (and what it replaces)
The starting point was TRACCERR/Sumtablets_Merged
(~200k rows, 53.7 GB, rev 67e3d17), itself a merge of
colesimmons/SumTablets
(glyph–transliteration pairs; paper) and
colesimmons/SumTablets_Photos. The original improvement plan was a single
re-split tool to fix suspected train/test tablet leakage.
That plan was reviewed and rebuilt into a 7-phase pipeline
(Sumtables-Cuneiform-Full-Fable5-Remaster_Dataset_Plan.md) because split hygiene alone left the
dataset's real limitations untouched:
| Planned originally | Found during rebuild | What shipped instead |
|---|---|---|
| Fix same-tablet leakage across splits | Upstream had zero cross-split tablets — the feared leak didn't exist | Split rebuilt anyway with stronger guarantees: perceptual-duplicate co-assignment, formula-leakage measurement, minimum-representation stratification |
| Keep "English translations" grouped | The dataset contains no translations at all (and its Unicode glyphs are dictionary-derived, not observed) | A translation layer was built from external sources (Phase 3) |
| Exact-hash image dedup | Exact hashing misses recompressed/cropped duplicates; naive pHash over-merges | pHash + dHash confirmation; oversized similarity components forced to train |
| Use images as-is | Mean embedded photo is ~388×731 px; many CDLI images are multi-view composites misaligned with full-tablet text | Full-res re-fetch, composite segmentation, per-surface text alignment, readability tiers |
| — | ~1.8% of "lineart" images are scanned publication text pages (Latin print), found by human review | Calibrated document-scan detector; flagged images excluded from vision tasks |
2. Pipeline phases — planned vs. delivered
Phase 0 — Audit & leakage-proof re-split (clean_sumtablets.py) ✅
Deterministic tablet-grouped 90/5/5 re-split (seed 42) of all 199,964 rows /
89,485 canonical P###### tablets, stratified by period × genre × modality
with minimum eval representation per stratum.
Results (full corpus, all hard assertions PASS):
- train 178,116 / validation 9,864 / test 9,865 / quarantine 2,119 rows; tablets 80,567 / 4,459 / 4,459 = 90.03 / 4.98 / 4.98%.
- 53,926 exact-duplicate image groups (4 spanning different tablet IDs — flagged for review); 922,737 pHash near-duplicate pairs → 12,481 tablets merged into shared "leak groups" so perceptual twins can never straddle splits. dHash confirmation rejects spurious pHash links (hand-drawn lineart otherwise over-merges).
- Two giant Ur III similarity components (8,085 and 4,037 tablets) exist; the allocator forces any group larger than the eval quota into train (regression-tested) — largest group in val/test is 2 tablets.
- Formula leakage measured, not hidden: 156 near-verbatim text groups
span tablets; 12 validation and 25 test tablets have a train twin. Tagged
in
formula_leakage.csv; the eval harness reports metrics with and without them. - Quarantine = 2,081 ORACC
Q######composite-text IDs + 38X######— real identifiers of composite editions, not physical tablets; excluded from splits by design (re-admission with leak screening is a documented future option). - Audit columns on every row:
canonical_tablet_id,original_tablet_id,source_split,assigned_split,modality,duplicate_group,formula_dup_group,validation_flags,provenance.
Phase 1 — Image elevation (phase1_images.py) ✅ complete
CDLI full-resolution re-fetch, complete census: all 178,970 tablet×kind URL pairs resolved — 71,852 images downloaded (37,810 photos + 34,042 lineart, 116 GB), 106,999 definitive "no image hosted" 404s recorded per tablet, 119 corrupt-at-source files logged. Resumable manifest survived a disk-full crash and an external process kill with zero loss (supervised auto-restart loop; manifest surgery for the ~380 transient errors — note
--retry-errorsre-attempts 404s too, so targeted retries edit the manifest instead). Finding: re-fetching does not upscale existing images (where CDLI hosts a file the dataset already embedded it at identical resolution); its value is coverage — thousands of images for tablets that had none of that kind, converting text-only tablets into vision samples.Composite segmentation by projection profiling → per-surface panel bounding boxes (manifests only; crops materialize at packaging). Adjustment after human review (199/200 correct, gate G1 passed): stacked CDLI layouts needed a relaxed-gap re-split pass, and the dominant panel may never be labeled an "edge" (regression test
P201395).Surface–text alignment: transliterations split at
<SURFACE>markers and paired with panels when counts match → 87,764 aligned surface pairs full-corpus (37,410 count-matched + 6,631 trivial images; 34.9% of the 126,282 analyzed images fully align, the rest keep whole-image supervision).Readability tiers A/B/C from blur, contrast, and estimated sign height; tier C never becomes an OCR target. Full-corpus result: 52,602 tablets hold at least one tier-A/B image (47,427 train / 2,598 val / 2,577 test); tier A dominates the fetched images (45,286 of 64,157 train fetches).
Document-scan detector — entirely human-review-driven addition: users of the G1 review page found publication text pages mislabeled as lineart. Detector calibrated on 13 human-labeled images (4 pages / 9 genuine hand copies); naive heuristics false-positived at 25–45% (curved hand-drawn outlines defeat vertical-run tests; stacked views shrink per-view runs). Final rule (band geometry + ink density + dilated vertical-run) flags 1,164 images full-corpus (~2.1% of lineart), catching all human-found pages, clearing all 9 labeled copies; spot-check precision 3/4 (over-flagging is accepted: a flag only removes an image from vision training, never deletes data).
Phase 2 — Task architecture (phase2_tasks.py + mixer_config.yaml) ✅
Task-tagged records with 25 deterministic prompt paraphrases per task, canonical output formats validated on every record, per-tablet caps, and a train-only mixture spec.
Adjustment (bug found in v1 mixer): scarce tasks throttled the whole
mixture (T8's 5.5k records nearly cut train from ~105k to 12.7k). Fixed
semantics: the most-available task anchors totals, scarce tasks underfill
with reported deviations, and exact mixture shares are enforced at training
time via sampling weights using the shipped mixer_config.yaml.
v1.0.0 totals: 402,004 train records (259,457 vision / 142,547 text) plus
4,549 external T5 grounding records; 24,507 validation and 24,446 test
records (~15.4k vision each). Per-task counts live in the release's
build_report.json and MANIFEST.parquet. A curated 4,850-record
starter pack (starter_train.parquet, vision-first mixture, tier-A/B
only for OCR, refusal-capped abstention) ships for quick fine-tune runs.
Phase 3 — Translation layer (phase3_translations.py) ✅
- CDLI ATF harvest: 5,357 tablets with line-aligned
#tr.entranslations (2,094 train / 124 val / 121 test in-corpus; 3,018 external tablets admitted to train only after screening their text against every eval tablet's normalized transliteration). - Templated Ur III renderer: precision-first CFG rules (only tablets with
≥80% of lines fully parsed) → 409 tablets,
source=templated, train-only, 7% of T8 (cap: 40%). Adjustment: rules had to be rewritten in the corpus's Unicode orthography (š, subscript numerals) — the CDLI ASCII convention (sz, plain digits) matches zero corpus lines. - Gold-997: stratified test-pool benchmark selection (856 with images,
43 with harvested translations), human-approved selection, per-item
verification_statustracking (verification pending). - Dead end documented: ORACC
etcsriJSON exposes word glosses only — sentence translations are HTML-only (future scrape).
Phase 4 — External sign grounding (phase4_grounding.py) ✅
eBL cuneiform-OCR coco-recognition set (Zenodo 10693601):
654 tablet photographs, 46k+ sign boxes, 120 sign classes → 4,549
T5 records (dense detection, locate-sign, read-region; 0–1000 normalized
boxes; valid-JSON targets). This file is 100% vision by construction —
grounding has no text-only variant — and stays a separate parquet so the
unlicensed images can be excluded from redistribution by omitting one file. Leak-guarded against eval P-numbers (0 overlaps
found). Largely Akkadian — intended cross-script sign-shape transfer, tagged
origin=ebl. License not stated upstream → train_local_only: these
images must not be redistributed with the dataset.
Phase 5 — Packaging (phase5_package.py) ✅
releases/Sumtables-Cuneiform-Full-Fable5-Remaster-v1.0.0: 455,506 records across
train.parquet (402,004; 259,457 vision, images at a 2048px training
budget — full-resolution originals preserved in Phase1/fetched),
validation.parquet (24,507), test.parquet (24,446), and the train-local
t5_train.parquet (4,549). Ships MANIFEST.parquet (per-sample provenance
for re-weighting without touching image bytes), phase reports, mixer
config, dataset card — with every conversation validated against the
actual Qwen3-VL chat template (zero flags) and eval↔train tablet
disjointness re-verified from the written files at package time.
The earlier v0.9.0 pre-release (149,489 records, text-only train) is
superseded but retained for provenance.
Phase 6 — Evaluation harness (phase6_eval.py) ✅
Resumable predictions (mock + any OpenAI-compatible server), CER, sign-level F1, chrF, metadata accuracy, abstention precision/recall, insertion-rate honesty proxy; strata by task × period × genre × tier; dual reporting with and without formula-leaked tablets. Validated end-to-end with a floor baseline (all metrics at expected floor over 16,463 real test items).
3. Measured baseline (zero-shot Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct)
2,000-item random sample, locally served model, pre-v1.0 test parquet (definitive run re-executes on v1.0):
| Task | Zero-shot result |
|---|---|
| T1/T2/T3 image reading | Refuses 93–99% of images; attempted readings ≈ 0 sign-F1 |
| T10 abstention | recall 0.97 / precision 0.44 — the base model over-refuses |
| T11 metadata | genre 94.6% (majority-class artifact); period 0.9% (never predicts Ur III) |
| T6 signs→translit | CER 0.83, sign-F1 0.042 |
| T7 translit→signs | CER 0.86, sign-F1 0.004 |
| T8 translation | chrF 0.149 |
Interpretation: the pretrained model can neither read cuneiform images nor map signs to readings — and it already knows to refuse. Post-training gains on sign-F1/CER are therefore attributable to this dataset, and the training risk to manage is residual over-refusal, not hallucination alone.
4. Training path (first fine-tune: Qwen3-VL-4B)
Two equivalent routes onto the same Unsloth engine — both consume the curated starter pack (4,850 records: 1,500 surface OCR / 1,000 lineart / 500 full-tablet / 400 sign grounding / 250 photo-lineart pairs / 250 metadata / 100 refusal-capped abstention / 850 text tasks; tier-A/B only for OCR; one record per tablet per task):
- Unsloth Studio (GUI): load the exported dataset directory
unsloth_starter/(export_unsloth.pyconverts our parquet into the documented Studio format — amessagescolumn with typed content parts and animagescolumn; 4,850 samples, 4,000 with images). Studio's dataset preview should auto-map both columns. - Script (
train_lora.py): the same UnslothFastVisionModelworkflow headless, with the capability guardrails executed automatically — vision-native loader asserted at load, adapter-only artifact, stray-config removal, andverify_model_capabilities.pyrun on the output (non-zero exit on any regression).
Either way, acceptance is gated (see TRAINING_GUARDRAILS.md, written
after a prior non-pipeline fine-tune silently lost vision and clamped
context 256k→64k): the served result must pass the live vision probe and
the ~70k-token needle probe, then phase6_eval.py on validation against
the zero-shot reference (sign-F1 ≈ 0, 93–99% refusal). The 4B run
validates the data recipe cheaply; the identical recipe scales to
Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct (--model Qwen/Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct).
5. Engineering log (what broke and what it taught)
| Incident / discovery | Consequence baked into the pipeline |
|---|---|
| Upstream had zero cross-split tablets — but 922,737 pHash near-dup pairs and 156 cross-tablet formula groups | Leak groups + formula tagging replaced the original "fix the split" premise |
| Naive pHash merging false-positived 25–45% on hand-drawn lineart | dHash confirmation; oversized similarity groups forced to train |
| Human review found publication text pages inside "lineart" (~2.1%) | Calibrated document-scan detector; review page now shows flag status |
| CDLI re-fetch upscaled nothing (uplift = 1.0) | Reframed as coverage acquisition; 404s recorded as a permanent census |
| Scarce T8 throttled the mixer to 12% of available data | Backbone-anchored mixer; exact shares enforced at training time via sampling weights |
| Template renderer matched zero lines | Corpus uses Unicode orthography (š, subscripts), not CDLI ASCII — rules rewritten, 409 tablets rendered at ≥80% line coverage |
| Disk-full crash + external process kill mid-fetch | Supervised auto-restart, append-safe manifest with surgery tooling, everything resumable |
| Zero-shot model over-refuses (precision 0.44) | Starter pack caps refusal examples at 40% of the abstention slice |
| Prior fine-tune lost vision & context silently | verify_model_capabilities.py + guardrails doc gate every artifact |
6. Dataset structure
Each record: task, tablet (canonical P-number or ebl: namespace),
split, tier, conversations (system/user/assistant JSON, image flag on
the user turn, canonical output format per task), image
(struct{bytes,path} or null), provenance (JSON: image key, bbox, prompt id,
origin, license posture).
Output conventions: transliterations preserve <SURFACE> / <COLUMN> /
<RULING> / <BLANK_SPACE>, subscript numerals, damage tokens (<unk>,
...); refusals are exactly <ILLEGIBLE_IMAGE> …; T11 targets are
{"period": ..., "genre": ...}; T5 targets are JSON with 0–1000 boxes.
7. Validate it yourself
pip install -r requirements.txt
python -m pytest tests -q # 65 tests: split integrity, segmentation,
# grading, alignment, mixer, metrics, leak guards
- Split integrity: re-run
clean_sumtablets.py --dry-runand diffsplit_manifest.csv; every hard assertion is recomputed from the written parquet, not trusted from memory. - Segmentation quality: open
Phase1/review_sample.html— 200 seeded images with detected boxes drawn; document-flagged cards are marked. - Mixture & provenance:
MANIFEST.parquet+build_report.jsonexpose every record's task, source, prompt id, and the mixer's target-vs-achieved shares including underfills. - Metrics:
phase6_eval.pyis deterministic given a predictions file; floor and oracle mock modes bound every metric. - Capability preservation (lessons learned from a prior training attempt
that silently lost vision and clamped context 256k→64k): every training
artifact must pass
verify_model_capabilities.py— static checks on architecture,max_position_embeddings=262144, mRoPE, vision tower tensors, processor files, GGUF mmproj, plus live vision and ~70k-token needle probes. Rules and acceptance checklist:TRAINING_GUARDRAILS.md.
8. Status & roadmap
- ✅ v1.0.0 released: CDLI fetch complete (all 178,970 pairs resolved; 71,852 full-res images), full-corpus Phase 1 manifests (126,282 images, 87,764 surface pairs), train vision tasks materialized at a 2048px training budget, floor baseline recorded on the v1.0 test split, tablet disjointness re-verified across all release files.
- ▶ Next: first fine-tune (Qwen3-VL-4B on the starter pack via
train_lora.py), gated byverify_model_capabilities.py. - ⏳ Gold-997 per-item expert verification.
- Future: ORACC etcsri HTML translation scrape; ETCSL; Q-composite re-admission with leak screening; DeepScribe/MaiCuBeDa ingestion; synthetic font renders (T12).
9. Licensing
| Component | License |
|---|---|
| SumTablets text (upstream) | CC BY 4.0 |
| SumTablets photos (upstream) | Apache 2.0 |
| CDLI ATF transliterations/translations | CDLI terms — attribution (cdli.earth) |
| ORACC etcsri (consulted) | CC0 |
| eBL sign-grounding images (T5) | Unstated — train-local only, excluded from redistribution |
Pipeline code (*.py, this repo) |
MIT |
10. Acknowledgements
Built on the work of the CDLI, ORACC/ePSD2, ETCSL, and eBL projects and the SumTablets authors (Simmons et al. 2024), representing decades of Assyriological digitization. Dataset restructuring executed with Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic); human direction, review labels, and gate approvals by the project owner.
11. Why Qwen3-VL?
Because the model family is specifically positioned around stronger OCR, rare/ancient character handling, blur/tilt robustness, and long-document structure parsing. That matters for cuneiform because the problem is not only “read image text”; it is damaged visual signs, surface structure, line order, uncertain readings, and translation context.
- Downloads last month
- 40

