html_url stringlengths 57 57 | labels listlengths 1 6 | text stringlengths 32 258k | issue_number int64 22.4k 33k | embedding listlengths 768 768 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26211 | [
"Documentation",
"Needs Investigation"
] | Possible inconsistency between documentation and code for user guide of PLSCanonical
### Describe the issue linked to the documentation
Recently I've been learning Partial Least Squares (PLS), and learned that there are some variations of PLS, namely PLS-Canonical, PLS-SVD, PLS2 and PLS1 (mainly from the [User Guide ... | 26,211 | [
0.03286569565534592,
-0.025841722264885902,
0.026283619925379753,
-0.015051494352519512,
0.04281101003289223,
0.0030563424807041883,
0.11986565589904785,
-0.011317317374050617,
-0.020525844767689705,
0.03241295367479324,
0.018305491656064987,
0.04206504672765732,
0.07592328637838364,
-0.04... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26211 | [
"Documentation",
"Needs Investigation"
] | Possible inconsistency between documentation and code for user guide of PLSCanonical
### Describe the issue linked to the documentation
Recently I've been learning Partial Least Squares (PLS), and learned that there are some variations of PLS, namely PLS-Canonical, PLS-SVD, PLS2 and PLS1 (mainly from the [User Guide ... | 26,211 | [
0.03286569565534592,
-0.025841722264885902,
0.026283619925379753,
-0.015051494352519512,
0.04281101003289223,
0.0030563424807041883,
0.11986565589904785,
-0.011317317374050617,
-0.020525844767689705,
0.03241295367479324,
0.018305491656064987,
0.04206504672765732,
0.07592328637838364,
-0.04... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26210 | [
"Bug",
"module:compose",
"Pandas compatibility"
] | confusing fit failure when using set_config(transform_output="pandas")
### Describe the bug
Using `set_config(transform_output="pandas")` in combination with `ColumnTransformer` may result in a failed fit, since indices do not align as expected. The error will not be especially helpful: "ValueError: Found input varia... | 26,210 | [
0.008863409049808979,
0.006545191630721092,
0.026122253388166428,
0.0035533353220671415,
0.09210415184497833,
0.00017206923803314567,
0.03817756101489067,
0.018925517797470093,
-0.04154510423541069,
-0.016036761924624443,
0.03954476863145828,
-0.02713397704064846,
0.07684582471847534,
0.02... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26210 | [
"Bug",
"module:compose",
"Pandas compatibility"
] | confusing fit failure when using set_config(transform_output="pandas")
### Describe the bug
Using `set_config(transform_output="pandas")` in combination with `ColumnTransformer` may result in a failed fit, since indices do not align as expected. The error will not be especially helpful: "ValueError: Found input varia... | 26,210 | [
0.008863409049808979,
0.006545191630721092,
0.026122253388166428,
0.0035533353220671415,
0.09210415184497833,
0.00017206923803314567,
0.03817756101489067,
0.018925517797470093,
-0.04154510423541069,
-0.016036761924624443,
0.03954476863145828,
-0.02713397704064846,
0.07684582471847534,
0.02... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26210 | [
"Bug",
"module:compose",
"Pandas compatibility"
] | confusing fit failure when using set_config(transform_output="pandas")
### Describe the bug
Using `set_config(transform_output="pandas")` in combination with `ColumnTransformer` may result in a failed fit, since indices do not align as expected. The error will not be especially helpful: "ValueError: Found input varia... | 26,210 | [
0.008863409049808979,
0.006545191630721092,
0.026122253388166428,
0.0035533353220671415,
0.09210415184497833,
0.00017206923803314567,
0.03817756101489067,
0.018925517797470093,
-0.04154510423541069,
-0.016036761924624443,
0.03954476863145828,
-0.02713397704064846,
0.07684582471847534,
0.02... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26210 | [
"Bug",
"module:compose",
"Pandas compatibility"
] | confusing fit failure when using set_config(transform_output="pandas")
### Describe the bug
Using `set_config(transform_output="pandas")` in combination with `ColumnTransformer` may result in a failed fit, since indices do not align as expected. The error will not be especially helpful: "ValueError: Found input varia... | 26,210 | [
0.008863409049808979,
0.006545191630721092,
0.026122253388166428,
0.0035533353220671415,
0.09210415184497833,
0.00017206923803314567,
0.03817756101489067,
0.018925517797470093,
-0.04154510423541069,
-0.016036761924624443,
0.03954476863145828,
-0.02713397704064846,
0.07684582471847534,
0.02... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26210 | [
"Bug",
"module:compose",
"Pandas compatibility"
] | confusing fit failure when using set_config(transform_output="pandas")
### Describe the bug
Using `set_config(transform_output="pandas")` in combination with `ColumnTransformer` may result in a failed fit, since indices do not align as expected. The error will not be especially helpful: "ValueError: Found input varia... | 26,210 | [
0.008863409049808979,
0.006545191630721092,
0.026122253388166428,
0.0035533353220671415,
0.09210415184497833,
0.00017206923803314567,
0.03817756101489067,
0.018925517797470093,
-0.04154510423541069,
-0.016036761924624443,
0.03954476863145828,
-0.02713397704064846,
0.07684582471847534,
0.02... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26197 | [
"Bug",
"Needs Triage"
] | Overflow in ParameterGrid.__len__
### Describe the bug
Dear all,
the __len__ function from the ParameterGrid gets an overflow when having a large HP parameter set.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```python
from sklearn.model_selection import ParameterGrid
import numpy as np
hyper_parameters = {
'num_co... | 26,197 | [
-0.024034051224589348,
-0.017493734136223793,
0.0206606388092041,
0.004258104134351015,
0.11844074726104736,
0.0036230541300028563,
-0.025345828384160995,
0.02052643522620201,
-0.07687394320964813,
0.010061291977763176,
0.024595316499471664,
0.006381102837622166,
0.005178533960133791,
0.03... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26197 | [
"Bug",
"Needs Triage"
] | Overflow in ParameterGrid.__len__
### Describe the bug
Dear all,
the __len__ function from the ParameterGrid gets an overflow when having a large HP parameter set.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```python
from sklearn.model_selection import ParameterGrid
import numpy as np
hyper_parameters = {
'num_co... | 26,197 | [
-0.024034051224589348,
-0.017493734136223793,
0.0206606388092041,
0.004258104134351015,
0.11844074726104736,
0.0036230541300028563,
-0.025345828384160995,
0.02052643522620201,
-0.07687394320964813,
0.010061291977763176,
0.024595316499471664,
0.006381102837622166,
0.005178533960133791,
0.03... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26197 | [
"Bug",
"Needs Triage"
] | Overflow in ParameterGrid.__len__
### Describe the bug
Dear all,
the __len__ function from the ParameterGrid gets an overflow when having a large HP parameter set.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```python
from sklearn.model_selection import ParameterGrid
import numpy as np
hyper_parameters = {
'num_co... | 26,197 | [
-0.024034051224589348,
-0.017493734136223793,
0.0206606388092041,
0.004258104134351015,
0.11844074726104736,
0.0036230541300028563,
-0.025345828384160995,
0.02052643522620201,
-0.07687394320964813,
0.010061291977763176,
0.024595316499471664,
0.006381102837622166,
0.005178533960133791,
0.03... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26190 | [
"Bug",
"Needs Triage"
] | CHAT GPT response seems to be limited to some # of lines
### Describe the bug
I am new user working with Chat GPT for ab out 1 1/2 months I am generally using this to help me write python programs. It has been quite useful but makes lots of mistakes. eventually it can find the right answer if you give it a few chanc... | 26,190 | [
0.034830354154109955,
-0.0007501114159822464,
-0.019627967849373817,
0.03565939888358116,
0.0024090937804430723,
-0.009132341481745243,
-0.030860772356390953,
0.03412369266152382,
0.035209786146879196,
-0.0030525531619787216,
0.019973795861005783,
-0.03907445818185806,
0.025287117809057236,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26182 | [
"Documentation",
"Needs Triage"
] | CircleCI token in README broken
### Describe the issue linked to the documentation
<img src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/108576690/232124886-02b5c01c-2077-44ea-a7b6-6a23ec355e4f.png" width="80%">
As is shown above, it seems that the CircleCI token is not generating correctly.
### Suggest a potenti... | 26,182 | [
-0.003920910879969597,
-0.05305371806025505,
-0.041295215487480164,
0.02463868074119091,
-0.025871766731142998,
0.00024489889619871974,
0.034919753670692444,
0.019576983526349068,
-0.03669010475277901,
0.025529587641358376,
0.038793694227933884,
0.026343706995248795,
0.012271820567548275,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26179 | [
"API"
] | SLEP006: default routing
In the context of:
- https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776
- https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26050
we've also discussed the possibility of developing a default routing strategy for certain metadata. In most cases this is `sample_weight` and proba... | 26,179 | [
0.029963020235300064,
0.04054725915193558,
0.04436274245381355,
-0.029268421232700348,
0.005384297575801611,
-0.01522692758589983,
0.07081612199544907,
-0.029986511915922165,
0.02916215918958187,
-0.04874371364712715,
0.06544195115566254,
0.0679490864276886,
-0.024006640538573265,
0.044536... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26175 | [
"Needs Triage"
] | ⚠️ CI failed on Wheel builder ⚠️
**CI failed on [Wheel builder](https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/actions/runs/4696146467)** (Apr 14, 2023)
COMMENT:
Thi one is a timeout during downloading dependencies. Closing. | 26,175 | [
-0.023574423044919968,
0.015042847953736782,
-0.022462736815214157,
-0.011721568182110786,
-0.008120818063616753,
0.025441152974963188,
-0.002828606404364109,
0.04051697999238968,
-0.03009185381233692,
0.021995138376951218,
0.07138851284980774,
0.04493466764688492,
-0.006910925731062889,
0... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26174 | [
"Needs Triage"
] | ⚠️ CI failed on Ubuntu_Atlas.ubuntu_atlas ⚠️
**CI failed on [Ubuntu_Atlas.ubuntu_atlas](https://dev.azure.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/_build/results?buildId=54164&view=logs&j=689a1c8f-ff4e-5689-1a1a-6fa551ae9eba)** (Apr 14, 2023)
- test_float_precision[33-MiniBatchKMeans-dense]
COMMENT:
## CI is no longer failing! ... | 26,174 | [
-0.01231470238417387,
0.013041965663433075,
-0.02043054811656475,
-0.0596146322786808,
0.038644757121801376,
0.012372097000479698,
0.03264973312616348,
0.0239598099142313,
-0.024031227454543114,
0.041063908487558365,
0.03934295475482941,
-0.005188826471567154,
-0.0008601749432273209,
0.088... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26170 | [
"module:model_selection",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | RFC BayesSearchCV in scikit-learn
### Discussed in https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/discussions/26141
<div type='discussions-op-text'>
<sup>Originally posted by **earlev4** April 11, 2023</sup>
**Hi! First off, thanks so much to the excellent work done by all the scikit-learn contributors! The proje... | 26,170 | [
0.0021413126960396767,
0.02953481487929821,
0.040014464408159256,
-0.03700544312596321,
0.007858693599700928,
-0.016775459051132202,
0.011334214359521866,
0.031542740762233734,
0.023406146094202995,
-0.03328566625714302,
0.0518425777554512,
0.025304939597845078,
-0.002423657104372978,
0.01... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26170 | [
"module:model_selection",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | RFC BayesSearchCV in scikit-learn
### Discussed in https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/discussions/26141
<div type='discussions-op-text'>
<sup>Originally posted by **earlev4** April 11, 2023</sup>
**Hi! First off, thanks so much to the excellent work done by all the scikit-learn contributors! The proje... | 26,170 | [
0.0021413126960396767,
0.02953481487929821,
0.040014464408159256,
-0.03700544312596321,
0.007858693599700928,
-0.016775459051132202,
0.011334214359521866,
0.031542740762233734,
0.023406146094202995,
-0.03328566625714302,
0.0518425777554512,
0.025304939597845078,
-0.002423657104372978,
0.01... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26170 | [
"module:model_selection",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | RFC BayesSearchCV in scikit-learn
### Discussed in https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/discussions/26141
<div type='discussions-op-text'>
<sup>Originally posted by **earlev4** April 11, 2023</sup>
**Hi! First off, thanks so much to the excellent work done by all the scikit-learn contributors! The proje... | 26,170 | [
0.0021413126960396767,
0.02953481487929821,
0.040014464408159256,
-0.03700544312596321,
0.007858693599700928,
-0.016775459051132202,
0.011334214359521866,
0.031542740762233734,
0.023406146094202995,
-0.03328566625714302,
0.0518425777554512,
0.025304939597845078,
-0.002423657104372978,
0.01... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26170 | [
"module:model_selection",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | RFC BayesSearchCV in scikit-learn
### Discussed in https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/discussions/26141
<div type='discussions-op-text'>
<sup>Originally posted by **earlev4** April 11, 2023</sup>
**Hi! First off, thanks so much to the excellent work done by all the scikit-learn contributors! The proje... | 26,170 | [
0.0021413126960396767,
0.02953481487929821,
0.040014464408159256,
-0.03700544312596321,
0.007858693599700928,
-0.016775459051132202,
0.011334214359521866,
0.031542740762233734,
0.023406146094202995,
-0.03328566625714302,
0.0518425777554512,
0.025304939597845078,
-0.002423657104372978,
0.01... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26170 | [
"module:model_selection",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | RFC BayesSearchCV in scikit-learn
### Discussed in https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/discussions/26141
<div type='discussions-op-text'>
<sup>Originally posted by **earlev4** April 11, 2023</sup>
**Hi! First off, thanks so much to the excellent work done by all the scikit-learn contributors! The proje... | 26,170 | [
0.0021413126960396767,
0.02953481487929821,
0.040014464408159256,
-0.03700544312596321,
0.007858693599700928,
-0.016775459051132202,
0.011334214359521866,
0.031542740762233734,
0.023406146094202995,
-0.03328566625714302,
0.0518425777554512,
0.025304939597845078,
-0.002423657104372978,
0.01... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26170 | [
"module:model_selection",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | RFC BayesSearchCV in scikit-learn
### Discussed in https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/discussions/26141
<div type='discussions-op-text'>
<sup>Originally posted by **earlev4** April 11, 2023</sup>
**Hi! First off, thanks so much to the excellent work done by all the scikit-learn contributors! The proje... | 26,170 | [
0.0021413126960396767,
0.02953481487929821,
0.040014464408159256,
-0.03700544312596321,
0.007858693599700928,
-0.016775459051132202,
0.011334214359521866,
0.031542740762233734,
0.023406146094202995,
-0.03328566625714302,
0.0518425777554512,
0.025304939597845078,
-0.002423657104372978,
0.01... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26170 | [
"module:model_selection",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | RFC BayesSearchCV in scikit-learn
### Discussed in https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/discussions/26141
<div type='discussions-op-text'>
<sup>Originally posted by **earlev4** April 11, 2023</sup>
**Hi! First off, thanks so much to the excellent work done by all the scikit-learn contributors! The proje... | 26,170 | [
0.0021413126960396767,
0.02953481487929821,
0.040014464408159256,
-0.03700544312596321,
0.007858693599700928,
-0.016775459051132202,
0.011334214359521866,
0.031542740762233734,
0.023406146094202995,
-0.03328566625714302,
0.0518425777554512,
0.025304939597845078,
-0.002423657104372978,
0.01... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26170 | [
"module:model_selection",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | RFC BayesSearchCV in scikit-learn
### Discussed in https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/discussions/26141
<div type='discussions-op-text'>
<sup>Originally posted by **earlev4** April 11, 2023</sup>
**Hi! First off, thanks so much to the excellent work done by all the scikit-learn contributors! The proje... | 26,170 | [
0.0021413126960396767,
0.02953481487929821,
0.040014464408159256,
-0.03700544312596321,
0.007858693599700928,
-0.016775459051132202,
0.011334214359521866,
0.031542740762233734,
0.023406146094202995,
-0.03328566625714302,
0.0518425777554512,
0.025304939597845078,
-0.002423657104372978,
0.01... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26170 | [
"module:model_selection",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | RFC BayesSearchCV in scikit-learn
### Discussed in https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/discussions/26141
<div type='discussions-op-text'>
<sup>Originally posted by **earlev4** April 11, 2023</sup>
**Hi! First off, thanks so much to the excellent work done by all the scikit-learn contributors! The proje... | 26,170 | [
0.0021413126960396767,
0.02953481487929821,
0.040014464408159256,
-0.03700544312596321,
0.007858693599700928,
-0.016775459051132202,
0.011334214359521866,
0.031542740762233734,
0.023406146094202995,
-0.03328566625714302,
0.0518425777554512,
0.025304939597845078,
-0.002423657104372978,
0.01... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26170 | [
"module:model_selection",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | RFC BayesSearchCV in scikit-learn
### Discussed in https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/discussions/26141
<div type='discussions-op-text'>
<sup>Originally posted by **earlev4** April 11, 2023</sup>
**Hi! First off, thanks so much to the excellent work done by all the scikit-learn contributors! The proje... | 26,170 | [
0.0021413126960396767,
0.02953481487929821,
0.040014464408159256,
-0.03700544312596321,
0.007858693599700928,
-0.016775459051132202,
0.011334214359521866,
0.031542740762233734,
0.023406146094202995,
-0.03328566625714302,
0.0518425777554512,
0.025304939597845078,
-0.002423657104372978,
0.01... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26170 | [
"module:model_selection",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | RFC BayesSearchCV in scikit-learn
### Discussed in https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/discussions/26141
<div type='discussions-op-text'>
<sup>Originally posted by **earlev4** April 11, 2023</sup>
**Hi! First off, thanks so much to the excellent work done by all the scikit-learn contributors! The proje... | 26,170 | [
0.0021413126960396767,
0.02953481487929821,
0.040014464408159256,
-0.03700544312596321,
0.007858693599700928,
-0.016775459051132202,
0.011334214359521866,
0.031542740762233734,
0.023406146094202995,
-0.03328566625714302,
0.0518425777554512,
0.025304939597845078,
-0.002423657104372978,
0.01... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26170 | [
"module:model_selection",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | RFC BayesSearchCV in scikit-learn
### Discussed in https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/discussions/26141
<div type='discussions-op-text'>
<sup>Originally posted by **earlev4** April 11, 2023</sup>
**Hi! First off, thanks so much to the excellent work done by all the scikit-learn contributors! The proje... | 26,170 | [
0.0021413126960396767,
0.02953481487929821,
0.040014464408159256,
-0.03700544312596321,
0.007858693599700928,
-0.016775459051132202,
0.011334214359521866,
0.031542740762233734,
0.023406146094202995,
-0.03328566625714302,
0.0518425777554512,
0.025304939597845078,
-0.002423657104372978,
0.01... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26170 | [
"module:model_selection",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | RFC BayesSearchCV in scikit-learn
### Discussed in https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/discussions/26141
<div type='discussions-op-text'>
<sup>Originally posted by **earlev4** April 11, 2023</sup>
**Hi! First off, thanks so much to the excellent work done by all the scikit-learn contributors! The proje... | 26,170 | [
0.0021413126960396767,
0.02953481487929821,
0.040014464408159256,
-0.03700544312596321,
0.007858693599700928,
-0.016775459051132202,
0.011334214359521866,
0.031542740762233734,
0.023406146094202995,
-0.03328566625714302,
0.0518425777554512,
0.025304939597845078,
-0.002423657104372978,
0.01... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26170 | [
"module:model_selection",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | RFC BayesSearchCV in scikit-learn
### Discussed in https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/discussions/26141
<div type='discussions-op-text'>
<sup>Originally posted by **earlev4** April 11, 2023</sup>
**Hi! First off, thanks so much to the excellent work done by all the scikit-learn contributors! The proje... | 26,170 | [
0.0021413126960396767,
0.02953481487929821,
0.040014464408159256,
-0.03700544312596321,
0.007858693599700928,
-0.016775459051132202,
0.011334214359521866,
0.031542740762233734,
0.023406146094202995,
-0.03328566625714302,
0.0518425777554512,
0.025304939597845078,
-0.002423657104372978,
0.01... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26167 | [
"wontfix"
] | Adding validation split in train_test_split
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
Hi, this is my first time. Help and suggestions are really appreciated. I wanted to include **validation split** with a simple `want_valid : bool` parameter in the **model_selection.train_test_split()** function given `stratified... | 26,167 | [
-0.03427935764193535,
0.012973335571587086,
0.02040145732462406,
-0.01297676656395197,
0.008810843341052532,
-0.007802346255630255,
0.0921982079744339,
0.01645410619676113,
-0.0035142546985298395,
-0.06565126031637192,
0.05071565508842468,
-0.028025226667523384,
-0.048975322395563126,
0.07... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26164 | [
"Bug",
"module:linear_model"
] | LinearRegression with zero sample_weights is not the same as excluding those rows
### Describe the bug
Excluding rows having `sample_weight == 0` in `LinearRegression` does not give the same results.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```python
from collections import Counter
import numpy as np
from sklearn.linea... | 26,164 | [
0.025530217215418816,
0.013241156935691833,
0.0253613218665123,
0.07975824922323227,
0.05251156911253929,
-0.02272712253034115,
0.05000199005007744,
-0.005523026455193758,
0.02599496766924858,
0.0011624125763773918,
0.03983272612094879,
0.03200061246752739,
0.011869333684444427,
0.00175173... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26164 | [
"Bug",
"module:linear_model"
] | LinearRegression with zero sample_weights is not the same as excluding those rows
### Describe the bug
Excluding rows having `sample_weight == 0` in `LinearRegression` does not give the same results.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```python
from collections import Counter
import numpy as np
from sklearn.linea... | 26,164 | [
0.025530217215418816,
0.013241156935691833,
0.0253613218665123,
0.07975824922323227,
0.05251156911253929,
-0.02272712253034115,
0.05000199005007744,
-0.005523026455193758,
0.02599496766924858,
0.0011624125763773918,
0.03983272612094879,
0.03200061246752739,
0.011869333684444427,
0.00175173... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26164 | [
"Bug",
"module:linear_model"
] | LinearRegression with zero sample_weights is not the same as excluding those rows
### Describe the bug
Excluding rows having `sample_weight == 0` in `LinearRegression` does not give the same results.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```python
from collections import Counter
import numpy as np
from sklearn.linea... | 26,164 | [
0.025530217215418816,
0.013241156935691833,
0.0253613218665123,
0.07975824922323227,
0.05251156911253929,
-0.02272712253034115,
0.05000199005007744,
-0.005523026455193758,
0.02599496766924858,
0.0011624125763773918,
0.03983272612094879,
0.03200061246752739,
0.011869333684444427,
0.00175173... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26164 | [
"Bug",
"module:linear_model"
] | LinearRegression with zero sample_weights is not the same as excluding those rows
### Describe the bug
Excluding rows having `sample_weight == 0` in `LinearRegression` does not give the same results.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```python
from collections import Counter
import numpy as np
from sklearn.linea... | 26,164 | [
0.025530217215418816,
0.013241156935691833,
0.0253613218665123,
0.07975824922323227,
0.05251156911253929,
-0.02272712253034115,
0.05000199005007744,
-0.005523026455193758,
0.02599496766924858,
0.0011624125763773918,
0.03983272612094879,
0.03200061246752739,
0.011869333684444427,
0.00175173... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26164 | [
"Bug",
"module:linear_model"
] | LinearRegression with zero sample_weights is not the same as excluding those rows
### Describe the bug
Excluding rows having `sample_weight == 0` in `LinearRegression` does not give the same results.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```python
from collections import Counter
import numpy as np
from sklearn.linea... | 26,164 | [
0.025530217215418816,
0.013241156935691833,
0.0253613218665123,
0.07975824922323227,
0.05251156911253929,
-0.02272712253034115,
0.05000199005007744,
-0.005523026455193758,
0.02599496766924858,
0.0011624125763773918,
0.03983272612094879,
0.03200061246752739,
0.011869333684444427,
0.00175173... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26164 | [
"Bug",
"module:linear_model"
] | LinearRegression with zero sample_weights is not the same as excluding those rows
### Describe the bug
Excluding rows having `sample_weight == 0` in `LinearRegression` does not give the same results.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```python
from collections import Counter
import numpy as np
from sklearn.linea... | 26,164 | [
0.025530217215418816,
0.013241156935691833,
0.0253613218665123,
0.07975824922323227,
0.05251156911253929,
-0.02272712253034115,
0.05000199005007744,
-0.005523026455193758,
0.02599496766924858,
0.0011624125763773918,
0.03983272612094879,
0.03200061246752739,
0.011869333684444427,
0.00175173... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26164 | [
"Bug",
"module:linear_model"
] | LinearRegression with zero sample_weights is not the same as excluding those rows
### Describe the bug
Excluding rows having `sample_weight == 0` in `LinearRegression` does not give the same results.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```python
from collections import Counter
import numpy as np
from sklearn.linea... | 26,164 | [
0.025530217215418816,
0.013241156935691833,
0.0253613218665123,
0.07975824922323227,
0.05251156911253929,
-0.02272712253034115,
0.05000199005007744,
-0.005523026455193758,
0.02599496766924858,
0.0011624125763773918,
0.03983272612094879,
0.03200061246752739,
0.011869333684444427,
0.00175173... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26164 | [
"Bug",
"module:linear_model"
] | LinearRegression with zero sample_weights is not the same as excluding those rows
### Describe the bug
Excluding rows having `sample_weight == 0` in `LinearRegression` does not give the same results.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```python
from collections import Counter
import numpy as np
from sklearn.linea... | 26,164 | [
0.025530217215418816,
0.013241156935691833,
0.0253613218665123,
0.07975824922323227,
0.05251156911253929,
-0.02272712253034115,
0.05000199005007744,
-0.005523026455193758,
0.02599496766924858,
0.0011624125763773918,
0.03983272612094879,
0.03200061246752739,
0.011869333684444427,
0.00175173... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26164 | [
"Bug",
"module:linear_model"
] | LinearRegression with zero sample_weights is not the same as excluding those rows
### Describe the bug
Excluding rows having `sample_weight == 0` in `LinearRegression` does not give the same results.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```python
from collections import Counter
import numpy as np
from sklearn.linea... | 26,164 | [
0.025530217215418816,
0.013241156935691833,
0.0253613218665123,
0.07975824922323227,
0.05251156911253929,
-0.02272712253034115,
0.05000199005007744,
-0.005523026455193758,
0.02599496766924858,
0.0011624125763773918,
0.03983272612094879,
0.03200061246752739,
0.011869333684444427,
0.00175173... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26164 | [
"Bug",
"module:linear_model"
] | LinearRegression with zero sample_weights is not the same as excluding those rows
### Describe the bug
Excluding rows having `sample_weight == 0` in `LinearRegression` does not give the same results.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```python
from collections import Counter
import numpy as np
from sklearn.linea... | 26,164 | [
0.025530217215418816,
0.013241156935691833,
0.0253613218665123,
0.07975824922323227,
0.05251156911253929,
-0.02272712253034115,
0.05000199005007744,
-0.005523026455193758,
0.02599496766924858,
0.0011624125763773918,
0.03983272612094879,
0.03200061246752739,
0.011869333684444427,
0.00175173... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26164 | [
"Bug",
"module:linear_model"
] | LinearRegression with zero sample_weights is not the same as excluding those rows
### Describe the bug
Excluding rows having `sample_weight == 0` in `LinearRegression` does not give the same results.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```python
from collections import Counter
import numpy as np
from sklearn.linea... | 26,164 | [
0.025530217215418816,
0.013241156935691833,
0.0253613218665123,
0.07975824922323227,
0.05251156911253929,
-0.02272712253034115,
0.05000199005007744,
-0.005523026455193758,
0.02599496766924858,
0.0011624125763773918,
0.03983272612094879,
0.03200061246752739,
0.011869333684444427,
0.00175173... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26164 | [
"Bug",
"module:linear_model"
] | LinearRegression with zero sample_weights is not the same as excluding those rows
### Describe the bug
Excluding rows having `sample_weight == 0` in `LinearRegression` does not give the same results.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```python
from collections import Counter
import numpy as np
from sklearn.linea... | 26,164 | [
0.025530217215418816,
0.013241156935691833,
0.0253613218665123,
0.07975824922323227,
0.05251156911253929,
-0.02272712253034115,
0.05000199005007744,
-0.005523026455193758,
0.02599496766924858,
0.0011624125763773918,
0.03983272612094879,
0.03200061246752739,
0.011869333684444427,
0.00175173... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26164 | [
"Bug",
"module:linear_model"
] | LinearRegression with zero sample_weights is not the same as excluding those rows
### Describe the bug
Excluding rows having `sample_weight == 0` in `LinearRegression` does not give the same results.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```python
from collections import Counter
import numpy as np
from sklearn.linea... | 26,164 | [
0.025530217215418816,
0.013241156935691833,
0.0253613218665123,
0.07975824922323227,
0.05251156911253929,
-0.02272712253034115,
0.05000199005007744,
-0.005523026455193758,
0.02599496766924858,
0.0011624125763773918,
0.03983272612094879,
0.03200061246752739,
0.011869333684444427,
0.00175173... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26164 | [
"Bug",
"module:linear_model"
] | LinearRegression with zero sample_weights is not the same as excluding those rows
### Describe the bug
Excluding rows having `sample_weight == 0` in `LinearRegression` does not give the same results.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```python
from collections import Counter
import numpy as np
from sklearn.linea... | 26,164 | [
0.025530217215418816,
0.013241156935691833,
0.0253613218665123,
0.07975824922323227,
0.05251156911253929,
-0.02272712253034115,
0.05000199005007744,
-0.005523026455193758,
0.02599496766924858,
0.0011624125763773918,
0.03983272612094879,
0.03200061246752739,
0.011869333684444427,
0.00175173... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26164 | [
"Bug",
"module:linear_model"
] | LinearRegression with zero sample_weights is not the same as excluding those rows
### Describe the bug
Excluding rows having `sample_weight == 0` in `LinearRegression` does not give the same results.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```python
from collections import Counter
import numpy as np
from sklearn.linea... | 26,164 | [
0.025530217215418816,
0.013241156935691833,
0.0253613218665123,
0.07975824922323227,
0.05251156911253929,
-0.02272712253034115,
0.05000199005007744,
-0.005523026455193758,
0.02599496766924858,
0.0011624125763773918,
0.03983272612094879,
0.03200061246752739,
0.011869333684444427,
0.00175173... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26164 | [
"Bug",
"module:linear_model"
] | LinearRegression with zero sample_weights is not the same as excluding those rows
### Describe the bug
Excluding rows having `sample_weight == 0` in `LinearRegression` does not give the same results.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```python
from collections import Counter
import numpy as np
from sklearn.linea... | 26,164 | [
0.025530217215418816,
0.013241156935691833,
0.0253613218665123,
0.07975824922323227,
0.05251156911253929,
-0.02272712253034115,
0.05000199005007744,
-0.005523026455193758,
0.02599496766924858,
0.0011624125763773918,
0.03983272612094879,
0.03200061246752739,
0.011869333684444427,
0.00175173... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26164 | [
"Bug",
"module:linear_model"
] | LinearRegression with zero sample_weights is not the same as excluding those rows
### Describe the bug
Excluding rows having `sample_weight == 0` in `LinearRegression` does not give the same results.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```python
from collections import Counter
import numpy as np
from sklearn.linea... | 26,164 | [
0.025530217215418816,
0.013241156935691833,
0.0253613218665123,
0.07975824922323227,
0.05251156911253929,
-0.02272712253034115,
0.05000199005007744,
-0.005523026455193758,
0.02599496766924858,
0.0011624125763773918,
0.03983272612094879,
0.03200061246752739,
0.011869333684444427,
0.00175173... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26158 | [
"Bug",
"Needs Triage"
] | Confusion Matrix is 1x1 instead of NxN if all labels and predicted labels are the same
### Describe the bug
A confusion matrix with all correctly predicted labels will generate a 1x1 confusion matrix, instead of a nxn confusion matrix (for n classes)
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```
from sklearn.metrics impor... | 26,158 | [
0.039747174829244614,
-0.0380721278488636,
0.024883365258574486,
0.04447804018855095,
0.08375600725412369,
0.02237660251557827,
0.045961569994688034,
-0.002291781594976783,
0.01911722682416439,
-0.009558748453855515,
0.01380864903330803,
0.013310716487467289,
0.02742765098810196,
-0.034639... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26157 | [
"Bug",
"Needs Reproducible Code",
"Needs Triage"
] | RFECV crashes with a non-pickable error even if n_jobs is set to 1.
### Describe the bug
When using the .fit method, the code crashes with warnings related to jbolib and no errors, even when n_jobs is set to 1.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```py
rfecv = RFECV(
estimator = regressors[0],
step =... | 26,157 | [
-0.004550209268927574,
-0.007085282355546951,
0.006132188253104687,
0.013717862777411938,
0.05256444215774536,
-0.009384525008499622,
0.0032723506446927786,
0.03109101578593254,
0.014368903823196888,
0.013306667096912861,
0.04840695112943649,
0.07709120959043503,
-0.016893308609724045,
0.0... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26157 | [
"Bug",
"Needs Reproducible Code",
"Needs Triage"
] | RFECV crashes with a non-pickable error even if n_jobs is set to 1.
### Describe the bug
When using the .fit method, the code crashes with warnings related to jbolib and no errors, even when n_jobs is set to 1.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```py
rfecv = RFECV(
estimator = regressors[0],
step =... | 26,157 | [
-0.004550209268927574,
-0.007085282355546951,
0.006132188253104687,
0.013717862777411938,
0.05256444215774536,
-0.009384525008499622,
0.0032723506446927786,
0.03109101578593254,
0.014368903823196888,
0.013306667096912861,
0.04840695112943649,
0.07709120959043503,
-0.016893308609724045,
0.0... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26154 | [
"Bug",
"Build / CI"
] | ⚠️ CI failed on Linux_Nightly.pylatest_pip_scipy_dev ⚠️
**CI is still failing on [Linux_Nightly.pylatest_pip_scipy_dev](https://dev.azure.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/_build/results?buildId=56792&view=logs&j=dfe99b15-50db-5d7b-b1e9-4105c42527cf)** (Jul 06, 2023)
Unable to find junit file. Please see link for details.... | 26,154 | [
0.0014620062429457903,
-0.014749934896826744,
-0.0431642048060894,
-0.08304701745510101,
0.016014182940125465,
0.011902906000614166,
0.026412270963191986,
0.058237891644239426,
0.044115278869867325,
0.029242854565382004,
0.02335408702492714,
0.041403207927942276,
-0.029144354164600372,
0.0... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26154 | [
"Bug",
"Build / CI"
] | ⚠️ CI failed on Linux_Nightly.pylatest_pip_scipy_dev ⚠️
**CI is still failing on [Linux_Nightly.pylatest_pip_scipy_dev](https://dev.azure.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/_build/results?buildId=56792&view=logs&j=dfe99b15-50db-5d7b-b1e9-4105c42527cf)** (Jul 06, 2023)
Unable to find junit file. Please see link for details.... | 26,154 | [
0.02018408104777336,
0.014120428822934628,
-0.04269487410783768,
-0.09141917526721954,
0.03883316367864609,
0.021770460531115532,
0.05108397454023361,
0.06200675666332245,
0.034147050231695175,
0.015071564354002476,
0.03427118808031082,
0.03021537885069847,
-0.018662601709365845,
0.0405955... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26154 | [
"Bug",
"Build / CI"
] | ⚠️ CI failed on Linux_Nightly.pylatest_pip_scipy_dev ⚠️
**CI is still failing on [Linux_Nightly.pylatest_pip_scipy_dev](https://dev.azure.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/_build/results?buildId=56792&view=logs&j=dfe99b15-50db-5d7b-b1e9-4105c42527cf)** (Jul 06, 2023)
Unable to find junit file. Please see link for details.... | 26,154 | [
0.001871032640337944,
0.03740901127457619,
-0.02611011452972889,
-0.06502126902341843,
0.057846587151288986,
0.032138943672180176,
0.05154801905155182,
0.06261706352233887,
-0.012165410444140434,
-0.004929892253130674,
0.023017531260848045,
0.029674675315618515,
0.01153839472681284,
0.0402... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26154 | [
"Bug",
"Build / CI"
] | ⚠️ CI failed on Linux_Nightly.pylatest_pip_scipy_dev ⚠️
**CI is still failing on [Linux_Nightly.pylatest_pip_scipy_dev](https://dev.azure.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/_build/results?buildId=56792&view=logs&j=dfe99b15-50db-5d7b-b1e9-4105c42527cf)** (Jul 06, 2023)
Unable to find junit file. Please see link for details.... | 26,154 | [
0.016599152237176895,
0.04983844980597496,
-0.014302083291113377,
-0.07338584959506989,
0.041550036519765854,
0.023639114573597908,
0.02480936422944069,
0.06887083500623703,
-0.012338444590568542,
-0.008502066135406494,
0.03368263319134712,
0.02720801718533039,
0.0004920241772197187,
0.059... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26154 | [
"Bug",
"Build / CI"
] | ⚠️ CI failed on Linux_Nightly.pylatest_pip_scipy_dev ⚠️
**CI is still failing on [Linux_Nightly.pylatest_pip_scipy_dev](https://dev.azure.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/_build/results?buildId=56792&view=logs&j=dfe99b15-50db-5d7b-b1e9-4105c42527cf)** (Jul 06, 2023)
Unable to find junit file. Please see link for details.... | 26,154 | [
0.00823657400906086,
0.006365695968270302,
-0.03470980003476143,
-0.07038864493370056,
0.02730054222047329,
0.014197629876434803,
0.04444121941924095,
0.07445216923952103,
0.015426567755639553,
0.028575221076607704,
0.02990560419857502,
0.02564324252307415,
-0.027161970734596252,
0.0473788... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26154 | [
"Bug",
"Build / CI"
] | ⚠️ CI failed on Linux_Nightly.pylatest_pip_scipy_dev ⚠️
**CI is still failing on [Linux_Nightly.pylatest_pip_scipy_dev](https://dev.azure.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/_build/results?buildId=56792&view=logs&j=dfe99b15-50db-5d7b-b1e9-4105c42527cf)** (Jul 06, 2023)
Unable to find junit file. Please see link for details.... | 26,154 | [
0.01539495401084423,
0.02939159795641899,
-0.03101057931780815,
-0.07974470406770706,
0.038743119686841965,
0.022731157019734383,
0.039788734167814255,
0.07416467368602753,
0.0477377325296402,
0.011474520899355412,
0.035676803439855576,
0.04390633851289749,
-0.01164014171808958,
0.04437279... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26154 | [
"Bug",
"Build / CI"
] | ⚠️ CI failed on Linux_Nightly.pylatest_pip_scipy_dev ⚠️
**CI is still failing on [Linux_Nightly.pylatest_pip_scipy_dev](https://dev.azure.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/_build/results?buildId=56792&view=logs&j=dfe99b15-50db-5d7b-b1e9-4105c42527cf)** (Jul 06, 2023)
Unable to find junit file. Please see link for details.... | 26,154 | [
0.000303692533634603,
-0.0008153579547069967,
-0.0372810997068882,
-0.09321475028991699,
0.02448861673474312,
0.014087099581956863,
0.02390904538333416,
0.04968530312180519,
0.027851123362779617,
0.03681054338812828,
0.0255570188164711,
0.033992618322372437,
-0.024956045672297478,
0.054411... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26154 | [
"Bug",
"Build / CI"
] | ⚠️ CI failed on Linux_Nightly.pylatest_pip_scipy_dev ⚠️
**CI is still failing on [Linux_Nightly.pylatest_pip_scipy_dev](https://dev.azure.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/_build/results?buildId=56792&view=logs&j=dfe99b15-50db-5d7b-b1e9-4105c42527cf)** (Jul 06, 2023)
Unable to find junit file. Please see link for details.... | 26,154 | [
-0.0013931336579844356,
0.00791951920837164,
-0.025969306007027626,
-0.04831281304359436,
0.034613847732543945,
0.004828694276511669,
0.03961075469851494,
0.07594628632068634,
0.01774675026535988,
0.027736300602555275,
0.027798064053058624,
0.03326999768614769,
-0.02999110519886017,
0.0407... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26154 | [
"Bug",
"Build / CI"
] | ⚠️ CI failed on Linux_Nightly.pylatest_pip_scipy_dev ⚠️
**CI is still failing on [Linux_Nightly.pylatest_pip_scipy_dev](https://dev.azure.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/_build/results?buildId=56792&view=logs&j=dfe99b15-50db-5d7b-b1e9-4105c42527cf)** (Jul 06, 2023)
Unable to find junit file. Please see link for details.... | 26,154 | [
0.0068978602066636086,
-0.011407719925045967,
-0.040925417095422745,
-0.08206868916749954,
0.022811835631728172,
0.005631834734231234,
0.028724022209644318,
0.06412003189325333,
0.03595450147986412,
0.02505975030362606,
0.020152296870946884,
0.03866904228925705,
-0.026709895581007004,
0.03... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26148 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision"
] | Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances
### Describe the bug
Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances. According to documentation, it should be the other way around: different randomness but identical RNG instances.
Related #25395
The User Guide [s... | 26,148 | [
-0.007646521087735891,
-0.021117091178894043,
0.023401081562042236,
0.009801422245800495,
-0.0033143681939691305,
-0.04639548808336258,
0.0285414420068264,
-0.012485950253903866,
-0.017728140577673912,
0.004994533956050873,
0.0019715321250259876,
0.02143043652176857,
0.036190226674079895,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26148 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision"
] | Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances
### Describe the bug
Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances. According to documentation, it should be the other way around: different randomness but identical RNG instances.
Related #25395
The User Guide [s... | 26,148 | [
-0.007646521087735891,
-0.021117091178894043,
0.023401081562042236,
0.009801422245800495,
-0.0033143681939691305,
-0.04639548808336258,
0.0285414420068264,
-0.012485950253903866,
-0.017728140577673912,
0.004994533956050873,
0.0019715321250259876,
0.02143043652176857,
0.036190226674079895,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26148 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision"
] | Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances
### Describe the bug
Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances. According to documentation, it should be the other way around: different randomness but identical RNG instances.
Related #25395
The User Guide [s... | 26,148 | [
-0.007646521087735891,
-0.021117091178894043,
0.023401081562042236,
0.009801422245800495,
-0.0033143681939691305,
-0.04639548808336258,
0.0285414420068264,
-0.012485950253903866,
-0.017728140577673912,
0.004994533956050873,
0.0019715321250259876,
0.02143043652176857,
0.036190226674079895,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26148 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision"
] | Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances
### Describe the bug
Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances. According to documentation, it should be the other way around: different randomness but identical RNG instances.
Related #25395
The User Guide [s... | 26,148 | [
-0.007646521087735891,
-0.021117091178894043,
0.023401081562042236,
0.009801422245800495,
-0.0033143681939691305,
-0.04639548808336258,
0.0285414420068264,
-0.012485950253903866,
-0.017728140577673912,
0.004994533956050873,
0.0019715321250259876,
0.02143043652176857,
0.036190226674079895,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26148 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision"
] | Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances
### Describe the bug
Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances. According to documentation, it should be the other way around: different randomness but identical RNG instances.
Related #25395
The User Guide [s... | 26,148 | [
-0.007646521087735891,
-0.021117091178894043,
0.023401081562042236,
0.009801422245800495,
-0.0033143681939691305,
-0.04639548808336258,
0.0285414420068264,
-0.012485950253903866,
-0.017728140577673912,
0.004994533956050873,
0.0019715321250259876,
0.02143043652176857,
0.036190226674079895,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26148 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision"
] | Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances
### Describe the bug
Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances. According to documentation, it should be the other way around: different randomness but identical RNG instances.
Related #25395
The User Guide [s... | 26,148 | [
-0.007646521087735891,
-0.021117091178894043,
0.023401081562042236,
0.009801422245800495,
-0.0033143681939691305,
-0.04639548808336258,
0.0285414420068264,
-0.012485950253903866,
-0.017728140577673912,
0.004994533956050873,
0.0019715321250259876,
0.02143043652176857,
0.036190226674079895,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26148 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision"
] | Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances
### Describe the bug
Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances. According to documentation, it should be the other way around: different randomness but identical RNG instances.
Related #25395
The User Guide [s... | 26,148 | [
-0.007646521087735891,
-0.021117091178894043,
0.023401081562042236,
0.009801422245800495,
-0.0033143681939691305,
-0.04639548808336258,
0.0285414420068264,
-0.012485950253903866,
-0.017728140577673912,
0.004994533956050873,
0.0019715321250259876,
0.02143043652176857,
0.036190226674079895,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26148 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision"
] | Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances
### Describe the bug
Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances. According to documentation, it should be the other way around: different randomness but identical RNG instances.
Related #25395
The User Guide [s... | 26,148 | [
-0.007646521087735891,
-0.021117091178894043,
0.023401081562042236,
0.009801422245800495,
-0.0033143681939691305,
-0.04639548808336258,
0.0285414420068264,
-0.012485950253903866,
-0.017728140577673912,
0.004994533956050873,
0.0019715321250259876,
0.02143043652176857,
0.036190226674079895,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26148 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision"
] | Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances
### Describe the bug
Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances. According to documentation, it should be the other way around: different randomness but identical RNG instances.
Related #25395
The User Guide [s... | 26,148 | [
-0.007646521087735891,
-0.021117091178894043,
0.023401081562042236,
0.009801422245800495,
-0.0033143681939691305,
-0.04639548808336258,
0.0285414420068264,
-0.012485950253903866,
-0.017728140577673912,
0.004994533956050873,
0.0019715321250259876,
0.02143043652176857,
0.036190226674079895,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26148 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision"
] | Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances
### Describe the bug
Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances. According to documentation, it should be the other way around: different randomness but identical RNG instances.
Related #25395
The User Guide [s... | 26,148 | [
-0.007646521087735891,
-0.021117091178894043,
0.023401081562042236,
0.009801422245800495,
-0.0033143681939691305,
-0.04639548808336258,
0.0285414420068264,
-0.012485950253903866,
-0.017728140577673912,
0.004994533956050873,
0.0019715321250259876,
0.02143043652176857,
0.036190226674079895,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26148 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision"
] | Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances
### Describe the bug
Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances. According to documentation, it should be the other way around: different randomness but identical RNG instances.
Related #25395
The User Guide [s... | 26,148 | [
-0.007646521087735891,
-0.021117091178894043,
0.023401081562042236,
0.009801422245800495,
-0.0033143681939691305,
-0.04639548808336258,
0.0285414420068264,
-0.012485950253903866,
-0.017728140577673912,
0.004994533956050873,
0.0019715321250259876,
0.02143043652176857,
0.036190226674079895,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26148 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision"
] | Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances
### Describe the bug
Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances. According to documentation, it should be the other way around: different randomness but identical RNG instances.
Related #25395
The User Guide [s... | 26,148 | [
-0.007646521087735891,
-0.021117091178894043,
0.023401081562042236,
0.009801422245800495,
-0.0033143681939691305,
-0.04639548808336258,
0.0285414420068264,
-0.012485950253903866,
-0.017728140577673912,
0.004994533956050873,
0.0019715321250259876,
0.02143043652176857,
0.036190226674079895,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26148 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision"
] | Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances
### Describe the bug
Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances. According to documentation, it should be the other way around: different randomness but identical RNG instances.
Related #25395
The User Guide [s... | 26,148 | [
-0.007646521087735891,
-0.021117091178894043,
0.023401081562042236,
0.009801422245800495,
-0.0033143681939691305,
-0.04639548808336258,
0.0285414420068264,
-0.012485950253903866,
-0.017728140577673912,
0.004994533956050873,
0.0019715321250259876,
0.02143043652176857,
0.036190226674079895,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26148 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision"
] | Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances
### Describe the bug
Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances. According to documentation, it should be the other way around: different randomness but identical RNG instances.
Related #25395
The User Guide [s... | 26,148 | [
-0.007646521087735891,
-0.021117091178894043,
0.023401081562042236,
0.009801422245800495,
-0.0033143681939691305,
-0.04639548808336258,
0.0285414420068264,
-0.012485950253903866,
-0.017728140577673912,
0.004994533956050873,
0.0019715321250259876,
0.02143043652176857,
0.036190226674079895,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26148 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision"
] | Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances
### Describe the bug
Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances. According to documentation, it should be the other way around: different randomness but identical RNG instances.
Related #25395
The User Guide [s... | 26,148 | [
-0.007646521087735891,
-0.021117091178894043,
0.023401081562042236,
0.009801422245800495,
-0.0033143681939691305,
-0.04639548808336258,
0.0285414420068264,
-0.012485950253903866,
-0.017728140577673912,
0.004994533956050873,
0.0019715321250259876,
0.02143043652176857,
0.036190226674079895,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26148 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision"
] | Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances
### Describe the bug
Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances. According to documentation, it should be the other way around: different randomness but identical RNG instances.
Related #25395
The User Guide [s... | 26,148 | [
-0.007646521087735891,
-0.021117091178894043,
0.023401081562042236,
0.009801422245800495,
-0.0033143681939691305,
-0.04639548808336258,
0.0285414420068264,
-0.012485950253903866,
-0.017728140577673912,
0.004994533956050873,
0.0019715321250259876,
0.02143043652176857,
0.036190226674079895,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26148 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision"
] | Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances
### Describe the bug
Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances. According to documentation, it should be the other way around: different randomness but identical RNG instances.
Related #25395
The User Guide [s... | 26,148 | [
-0.007646521087735891,
-0.021117091178894043,
0.023401081562042236,
0.009801422245800495,
-0.0033143681939691305,
-0.04639548808336258,
0.0285414420068264,
-0.012485950253903866,
-0.017728140577673912,
0.004994533956050873,
0.0019715321250259876,
0.02143043652176857,
0.036190226674079895,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26148 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision"
] | Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances
### Describe the bug
Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances. According to documentation, it should be the other way around: different randomness but identical RNG instances.
Related #25395
The User Guide [s... | 26,148 | [
-0.007646521087735891,
-0.021117091178894043,
0.023401081562042236,
0.009801422245800495,
-0.0033143681939691305,
-0.04639548808336258,
0.0285414420068264,
-0.012485950253903866,
-0.017728140577673912,
0.004994533956050873,
0.0019715321250259876,
0.02143043652176857,
0.036190226674079895,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26148 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision"
] | Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances
### Describe the bug
Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances. According to documentation, it should be the other way around: different randomness but identical RNG instances.
Related #25395
The User Guide [s... | 26,148 | [
-0.007646521087735891,
-0.021117091178894043,
0.023401081562042236,
0.009801422245800495,
-0.0033143681939691305,
-0.04639548808336258,
0.0285414420068264,
-0.012485950253903866,
-0.017728140577673912,
0.004994533956050873,
0.0019715321250259876,
0.02143043652176857,
0.036190226674079895,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26148 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision"
] | Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances
### Describe the bug
Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances. According to documentation, it should be the other way around: different randomness but identical RNG instances.
Related #25395
The User Guide [s... | 26,148 | [
-0.007646521087735891,
-0.021117091178894043,
0.023401081562042236,
0.009801422245800495,
-0.0033143681939691305,
-0.04639548808336258,
0.0285414420068264,
-0.012485950253903866,
-0.017728140577673912,
0.004994533956050873,
0.0019715321250259876,
0.02143043652176857,
0.036190226674079895,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26148 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision"
] | Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances
### Describe the bug
Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances. According to documentation, it should be the other way around: different randomness but identical RNG instances.
Related #25395
The User Guide [s... | 26,148 | [
-0.007646521087735891,
-0.021117091178894043,
0.023401081562042236,
0.009801422245800495,
-0.0033143681939691305,
-0.04639548808336258,
0.0285414420068264,
-0.012485950253903866,
-0.017728140577673912,
0.004994533956050873,
0.0019715321250259876,
0.02143043652176857,
0.036190226674079895,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26148 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision"
] | Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances
### Describe the bug
Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances. According to documentation, it should be the other way around: different randomness but identical RNG instances.
Related #25395
The User Guide [s... | 26,148 | [
-0.007646521087735891,
-0.021117091178894043,
0.023401081562042236,
0.009801422245800495,
-0.0033143681939691305,
-0.04639548808336258,
0.0285414420068264,
-0.012485950253903866,
-0.017728140577673912,
0.004994533956050873,
0.0019715321250259876,
0.02143043652176857,
0.036190226674079895,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26148 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision"
] | Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances
### Describe the bug
Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances. According to documentation, it should be the other way around: different randomness but identical RNG instances.
Related #25395
The User Guide [s... | 26,148 | [
-0.007646521087735891,
-0.021117091178894043,
0.023401081562042236,
0.009801422245800495,
-0.0033143681939691305,
-0.04639548808336258,
0.0285414420068264,
-0.012485950253903866,
-0.017728140577673912,
0.004994533956050873,
0.0019715321250259876,
0.02143043652176857,
0.036190226674079895,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26148 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision"
] | Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances
### Describe the bug
Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances. According to documentation, it should be the other way around: different randomness but identical RNG instances.
Related #25395
The User Guide [s... | 26,148 | [
-0.007646521087735891,
-0.021117091178894043,
0.023401081562042236,
0.009801422245800495,
-0.0033143681939691305,
-0.04639548808336258,
0.0285414420068264,
-0.012485950253903866,
-0.017728140577673912,
0.004994533956050873,
0.0019715321250259876,
0.02143043652176857,
0.036190226674079895,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26148 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision"
] | Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances
### Describe the bug
Cloned estimators have identical randomness but different RNG instances. According to documentation, it should be the other way around: different randomness but identical RNG instances.
Related #25395
The User Guide [s... | 26,148 | [
-0.007646521087735891,
-0.021117091178894043,
0.023401081562042236,
0.009801422245800495,
-0.0033143681939691305,
-0.04639548808336258,
0.0285414420068264,
-0.012485950253903866,
-0.017728140577673912,
0.004994533956050873,
0.0019715321250259876,
0.02143043652176857,
0.036190226674079895,
... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26140 | [
"Bug",
"Moderate",
"module:ensemble"
] | RandomForest not passing feature names to trees and creating warnings.
### Describe the bug
I fit a decision forest with training data that includes feature names. When I call predict_proba on the forest everything is fine. When I call rf.estimators_[0].predict_proba it will warn that it was not trained with featur... | 26,140 | [
0.07226641476154327,
-0.0026273138355463743,
0.02810027077794075,
-0.017319001257419586,
0.08799109607934952,
-0.015978436917066574,
0.006800568196922541,
-0.010415603406727314,
-0.00795065425336361,
0.010895435698330402,
0.0307180006057024,
-0.009203847497701645,
0.023883095011115074,
0.0... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26140 | [
"Bug",
"Moderate",
"module:ensemble"
] | RandomForest not passing feature names to trees and creating warnings.
### Describe the bug
I fit a decision forest with training data that includes feature names. When I call predict_proba on the forest everything is fine. When I call rf.estimators_[0].predict_proba it will warn that it was not trained with featur... | 26,140 | [
0.07226641476154327,
-0.0026273138355463743,
0.02810027077794075,
-0.017319001257419586,
0.08799109607934952,
-0.015978436917066574,
0.006800568196922541,
-0.010415603406727314,
-0.00795065425336361,
0.010895435698330402,
0.0307180006057024,
-0.009203847497701645,
0.023883095011115074,
0.0... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26140 | [
"Bug",
"Moderate",
"module:ensemble"
] | RandomForest not passing feature names to trees and creating warnings.
### Describe the bug
I fit a decision forest with training data that includes feature names. When I call predict_proba on the forest everything is fine. When I call rf.estimators_[0].predict_proba it will warn that it was not trained with featur... | 26,140 | [
0.07226641476154327,
-0.0026273138355463743,
0.02810027077794075,
-0.017319001257419586,
0.08799109607934952,
-0.015978436917066574,
0.006800568196922541,
-0.010415603406727314,
-0.00795065425336361,
0.010895435698330402,
0.0307180006057024,
-0.009203847497701645,
0.023883095011115074,
0.0... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26140 | [
"Bug",
"Moderate",
"module:ensemble"
] | RandomForest not passing feature names to trees and creating warnings.
### Describe the bug
I fit a decision forest with training data that includes feature names. When I call predict_proba on the forest everything is fine. When I call rf.estimators_[0].predict_proba it will warn that it was not trained with featur... | 26,140 | [
0.07226641476154327,
-0.0026273138355463743,
0.02810027077794075,
-0.017319001257419586,
0.08799109607934952,
-0.015978436917066574,
0.006800568196922541,
-0.010415603406727314,
-0.00795065425336361,
0.010895435698330402,
0.0307180006057024,
-0.009203847497701645,
0.023883095011115074,
0.0... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26140 | [
"Bug",
"Moderate",
"module:ensemble"
] | RandomForest not passing feature names to trees and creating warnings.
### Describe the bug
I fit a decision forest with training data that includes feature names. When I call predict_proba on the forest everything is fine. When I call rf.estimators_[0].predict_proba it will warn that it was not trained with featur... | 26,140 | [
0.07226641476154327,
-0.0026273138355463743,
0.02810027077794075,
-0.017319001257419586,
0.08799109607934952,
-0.015978436917066574,
0.006800568196922541,
-0.010415603406727314,
-0.00795065425336361,
0.010895435698330402,
0.0307180006057024,
-0.009203847497701645,
0.023883095011115074,
0.0... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26140 | [
"Bug",
"Moderate",
"module:ensemble"
] | RandomForest not passing feature names to trees and creating warnings.
### Describe the bug
I fit a decision forest with training data that includes feature names. When I call predict_proba on the forest everything is fine. When I call rf.estimators_[0].predict_proba it will warn that it was not trained with featur... | 26,140 | [
0.07226641476154327,
-0.0026273138355463743,
0.02810027077794075,
-0.017319001257419586,
0.08799109607934952,
-0.015978436917066574,
0.006800568196922541,
-0.010415603406727314,
-0.00795065425336361,
0.010895435698330402,
0.0307180006057024,
-0.009203847497701645,
0.023883095011115074,
0.0... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26140 | [
"Bug",
"Moderate",
"module:ensemble"
] | RandomForest not passing feature names to trees and creating warnings.
### Describe the bug
I fit a decision forest with training data that includes feature names. When I call predict_proba on the forest everything is fine. When I call rf.estimators_[0].predict_proba it will warn that it was not trained with featur... | 26,140 | [
0.07226641476154327,
-0.0026273138355463743,
0.02810027077794075,
-0.017319001257419586,
0.08799109607934952,
-0.015978436917066574,
0.006800568196922541,
-0.010415603406727314,
-0.00795065425336361,
0.010895435698330402,
0.0307180006057024,
-0.009203847497701645,
0.023883095011115074,
0.0... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26140 | [
"Bug",
"Moderate",
"module:ensemble"
] | RandomForest not passing feature names to trees and creating warnings.
### Describe the bug
I fit a decision forest with training data that includes feature names. When I call predict_proba on the forest everything is fine. When I call rf.estimators_[0].predict_proba it will warn that it was not trained with featur... | 26,140 | [
0.07226641476154327,
-0.0026273138355463743,
0.02810027077794075,
-0.017319001257419586,
0.08799109607934952,
-0.015978436917066574,
0.006800568196922541,
-0.010415603406727314,
-0.00795065425336361,
0.010895435698330402,
0.0307180006057024,
-0.009203847497701645,
0.023883095011115074,
0.0... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26140 | [
"Bug",
"Moderate",
"module:ensemble"
] | RandomForest not passing feature names to trees and creating warnings.
### Describe the bug
I fit a decision forest with training data that includes feature names. When I call predict_proba on the forest everything is fine. When I call rf.estimators_[0].predict_proba it will warn that it was not trained with featur... | 26,140 | [
0.07226641476154327,
-0.0026273138355463743,
0.02810027077794075,
-0.017319001257419586,
0.08799109607934952,
-0.015978436917066574,
0.006800568196922541,
-0.010415603406727314,
-0.00795065425336361,
0.010895435698330402,
0.0307180006057024,
-0.009203847497701645,
0.023883095011115074,
0.0... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26140 | [
"Bug",
"Moderate",
"module:ensemble"
] | RandomForest not passing feature names to trees and creating warnings.
### Describe the bug
I fit a decision forest with training data that includes feature names. When I call predict_proba on the forest everything is fine. When I call rf.estimators_[0].predict_proba it will warn that it was not trained with featur... | 26,140 | [
0.07226641476154327,
-0.0026273138355463743,
0.02810027077794075,
-0.017319001257419586,
0.08799109607934952,
-0.015978436917066574,
0.006800568196922541,
-0.010415603406727314,
-0.00795065425336361,
0.010895435698330402,
0.0307180006057024,
-0.009203847497701645,
0.023883095011115074,
0.0... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26140 | [
"Bug",
"Moderate",
"module:ensemble"
] | RandomForest not passing feature names to trees and creating warnings.
### Describe the bug
I fit a decision forest with training data that includes feature names. When I call predict_proba on the forest everything is fine. When I call rf.estimators_[0].predict_proba it will warn that it was not trained with featur... | 26,140 | [
0.07226641476154327,
-0.0026273138355463743,
0.02810027077794075,
-0.017319001257419586,
0.08799109607934952,
-0.015978436917066574,
0.006800568196922541,
-0.010415603406727314,
-0.00795065425336361,
0.010895435698330402,
0.0307180006057024,
-0.009203847497701645,
0.023883095011115074,
0.0... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26140 | [
"Bug",
"Moderate",
"module:ensemble"
] | RandomForest not passing feature names to trees and creating warnings.
### Describe the bug
I fit a decision forest with training data that includes feature names. When I call predict_proba on the forest everything is fine. When I call rf.estimators_[0].predict_proba it will warn that it was not trained with featur... | 26,140 | [
0.07226641476154327,
-0.0026273138355463743,
0.02810027077794075,
-0.017319001257419586,
0.08799109607934952,
-0.015978436917066574,
0.006800568196922541,
-0.010415603406727314,
-0.00795065425336361,
0.010895435698330402,
0.0307180006057024,
-0.009203847497701645,
0.023883095011115074,
0.0... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26140 | [
"Bug",
"Moderate",
"module:ensemble"
] | RandomForest not passing feature names to trees and creating warnings.
### Describe the bug
I fit a decision forest with training data that includes feature names. When I call predict_proba on the forest everything is fine. When I call rf.estimators_[0].predict_proba it will warn that it was not trained with featur... | 26,140 | [
0.07226641476154327,
-0.0026273138355463743,
0.02810027077794075,
-0.017319001257419586,
0.08799109607934952,
-0.015978436917066574,
0.006800568196922541,
-0.010415603406727314,
-0.00795065425336361,
0.010895435698330402,
0.0307180006057024,
-0.009203847497701645,
0.023883095011115074,
0.0... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26140 | [
"Bug",
"Moderate",
"module:ensemble"
] | RandomForest not passing feature names to trees and creating warnings.
### Describe the bug
I fit a decision forest with training data that includes feature names. When I call predict_proba on the forest everything is fine. When I call rf.estimators_[0].predict_proba it will warn that it was not trained with featur... | 26,140 | [
0.07226641476154327,
-0.0026273138355463743,
0.02810027077794075,
-0.017319001257419586,
0.08799109607934952,
-0.015978436917066574,
0.006800568196922541,
-0.010415603406727314,
-0.00795065425336361,
0.010895435698330402,
0.0307180006057024,
-0.009203847497701645,
0.023883095011115074,
0.0... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26140 | [
"Bug",
"Moderate",
"module:ensemble"
] | RandomForest not passing feature names to trees and creating warnings.
### Describe the bug
I fit a decision forest with training data that includes feature names. When I call predict_proba on the forest everything is fine. When I call rf.estimators_[0].predict_proba it will warn that it was not trained with featur... | 26,140 | [
0.07226641476154327,
-0.0026273138355463743,
0.02810027077794075,
-0.017319001257419586,
0.08799109607934952,
-0.015978436917066574,
0.006800568196922541,
-0.010415603406727314,
-0.00795065425336361,
0.010895435698330402,
0.0307180006057024,
-0.009203847497701645,
0.023883095011115074,
0.0... |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/26140 | [
"Bug",
"Moderate",
"module:ensemble"
] | RandomForest not passing feature names to trees and creating warnings.
### Describe the bug
I fit a decision forest with training data that includes feature names. When I call predict_proba on the forest everything is fine. When I call rf.estimators_[0].predict_proba it will warn that it was not trained with featur... | 26,140 | [
0.07226641476154327,
-0.0026273138355463743,
0.02810027077794075,
-0.017319001257419586,
0.08799109607934952,
-0.015978436917066574,
0.006800568196922541,
-0.010415603406727314,
-0.00795065425336361,
0.010895435698330402,
0.0307180006057024,
-0.009203847497701645,
0.023883095011115074,
0.0... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.