html_url stringlengths 57 57 | labels listlengths 1 6 | text stringlengths 32 258k | issue_number int64 22.4k 33k |
|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25844 | [
"Bug",
"good first issue"
] | X does not have valid feature names, but IsolationForest was fitted with feature names
### Describe the bug
If you fit an `IsolationForest` using a `pd.DataFrame` it generates a warning
``` python
X does not have valid feature names, but IsolationForest was fitted with feature names
```
This only seems to o... | 25,844 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25844 | [
"Bug",
"good first issue"
] | X does not have valid feature names, but IsolationForest was fitted with feature names
### Describe the bug
If you fit an `IsolationForest` using a `pd.DataFrame` it generates a warning
``` python
X does not have valid feature names, but IsolationForest was fitted with feature names
```
This only seems to o... | 25,844 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25844 | [
"Bug",
"good first issue"
] | X does not have valid feature names, but IsolationForest was fitted with feature names
### Describe the bug
If you fit an `IsolationForest` using a `pd.DataFrame` it generates a warning
``` python
X does not have valid feature names, but IsolationForest was fitted with feature names
```
This only seems to o... | 25,844 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25844 | [
"Bug",
"good first issue"
] | X does not have valid feature names, but IsolationForest was fitted with feature names
### Describe the bug
If you fit an `IsolationForest` using a `pd.DataFrame` it generates a warning
``` python
X does not have valid feature names, but IsolationForest was fitted with feature names
```
This only seems to o... | 25,844 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25838 | [
"module:test-suite"
] | TST sklearn/linear_model/tests/test_quantile.py::test_sparse_input fails on local windows
The test ``test_sparse_input`` from ``sklearn/linear_model/tests/test_quantile.py`` fails when I run the test suite locally (Windows).
It fails for the ``fit_intercept=True`` parametrization but passes for ``fit_intercept=Fals... | 25,838 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25838 | [
"module:test-suite"
] | TST sklearn/linear_model/tests/test_quantile.py::test_sparse_input fails on local windows
The test ``test_sparse_input`` from ``sklearn/linear_model/tests/test_quantile.py`` fails when I run the test suite locally (Windows).
It fails for the ``fit_intercept=True`` parametrization but passes for ``fit_intercept=Fals... | 25,838 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25838 | [
"module:test-suite"
] | TST sklearn/linear_model/tests/test_quantile.py::test_sparse_input fails on local windows
The test ``test_sparse_input`` from ``sklearn/linear_model/tests/test_quantile.py`` fails when I run the test suite locally (Windows).
It fails for the ``fit_intercept=True`` parametrization but passes for ``fit_intercept=Fals... | 25,838 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25838 | [
"module:test-suite"
] | TST sklearn/linear_model/tests/test_quantile.py::test_sparse_input fails on local windows
The test ``test_sparse_input`` from ``sklearn/linear_model/tests/test_quantile.py`` fails when I run the test suite locally (Windows).
It fails for the ``fit_intercept=True`` parametrization but passes for ``fit_intercept=Fals... | 25,838 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25825 | [
"Bug",
"Needs Triage"
] | GridSearchCV instant model convergence upon using many parameters
### Describe the bug
I am using `sklearn.model_selection.GridSearchCV` combined with a tensorflow/keras model wrapped using `scikeras.wrappers.KerasClassifier`. The image dataset used for classification can be downloaded [here](https://www.kaggle.com... | 25,825 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25824 | [
"New Feature",
"Needs Decision",
"module:cluster"
] | FastOPTICS in `sklearn.cluster`
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
Is there a roadmap to add the FastOPTICS algorithm, [1], to the `sklearn.cluster` code base that already supports OPTICS?
[1] 2013, J. Schneider, M. Vlachos, _Fast Parameterless Density-based Clustering via Random Projections
### Descri... | 25,824 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25824 | [
"New Feature",
"Needs Decision",
"module:cluster"
] | FastOPTICS in `sklearn.cluster`
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
Is there a roadmap to add the FastOPTICS algorithm, [1], to the `sklearn.cluster` code base that already supports OPTICS?
[1] 2013, J. Schneider, M. Vlachos, _Fast Parameterless Density-based Clustering via Random Projections
### Descri... | 25,824 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25824 | [
"New Feature",
"Needs Decision",
"module:cluster"
] | FastOPTICS in `sklearn.cluster`
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
Is there a roadmap to add the FastOPTICS algorithm, [1], to the `sklearn.cluster` code base that already supports OPTICS?
[1] 2013, J. Schneider, M. Vlachos, _Fast Parameterless Density-based Clustering via Random Projections
### Descri... | 25,824 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25824 | [
"New Feature",
"Needs Decision",
"module:cluster"
] | FastOPTICS in `sklearn.cluster`
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
Is there a roadmap to add the FastOPTICS algorithm, [1], to the `sklearn.cluster` code base that already supports OPTICS?
[1] 2013, J. Schneider, M. Vlachos, _Fast Parameterless Density-based Clustering via Random Projections
### Descri... | 25,824 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25822 | [
"Performance"
] | PERF: models with multithreading being slower than the same model with a single thread
While working on `skops`'s persistence, I realized sometimes it's faster for me to set `OMP_NUM_THREADS=1`.
I tried to isolate the issue. The differences here aren't large, and couldn't reproduce a massive difference, but in term... | 25,822 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25822 | [
"Performance"
] | PERF: models with multithreading being slower than the same model with a single thread
While working on `skops`'s persistence, I realized sometimes it's faster for me to set `OMP_NUM_THREADS=1`.
I tried to isolate the issue. The differences here aren't large, and couldn't reproduce a massive difference, but in term... | 25,822 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25822 | [
"Performance"
] | PERF: models with multithreading being slower than the same model with a single thread
While working on `skops`'s persistence, I realized sometimes it's faster for me to set `OMP_NUM_THREADS=1`.
I tried to isolate the issue. The differences here aren't large, and couldn't reproduce a massive difference, but in term... | 25,822 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25822 | [
"Performance"
] | PERF: models with multithreading being slower than the same model with a single thread
While working on `skops`'s persistence, I realized sometimes it's faster for me to set `OMP_NUM_THREADS=1`.
I tried to isolate the issue. The differences here aren't large, and couldn't reproduce a massive difference, but in term... | 25,822 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25822 | [
"Performance"
] | PERF: models with multithreading being slower than the same model with a single thread
While working on `skops`'s persistence, I realized sometimes it's faster for me to set `OMP_NUM_THREADS=1`.
I tried to isolate the issue. The differences here aren't large, and couldn't reproduce a massive difference, but in term... | 25,822 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25822 | [
"Performance"
] | PERF: models with multithreading being slower than the same model with a single thread
While working on `skops`'s persistence, I realized sometimes it's faster for me to set `OMP_NUM_THREADS=1`.
I tried to isolate the issue. The differences here aren't large, and couldn't reproduce a massive difference, but in term... | 25,822 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25822 | [
"Performance"
] | PERF: models with multithreading being slower than the same model with a single thread
While working on `skops`'s persistence, I realized sometimes it's faster for me to set `OMP_NUM_THREADS=1`.
I tried to isolate the issue. The differences here aren't large, and couldn't reproduce a massive difference, but in term... | 25,822 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25822 | [
"Performance"
] | PERF: models with multithreading being slower than the same model with a single thread
While working on `skops`'s persistence, I realized sometimes it's faster for me to set `OMP_NUM_THREADS=1`.
I tried to isolate the issue. The differences here aren't large, and couldn't reproduce a massive difference, but in term... | 25,822 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25822 | [
"Performance"
] | PERF: models with multithreading being slower than the same model with a single thread
While working on `skops`'s persistence, I realized sometimes it's faster for me to set `OMP_NUM_THREADS=1`.
I tried to isolate the issue. The differences here aren't large, and couldn't reproduce a massive difference, but in term... | 25,822 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25822 | [
"Performance"
] | PERF: models with multithreading being slower than the same model with a single thread
While working on `skops`'s persistence, I realized sometimes it's faster for me to set `OMP_NUM_THREADS=1`.
I tried to isolate the issue. The differences here aren't large, and couldn't reproduce a massive difference, but in term... | 25,822 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25822 | [
"Performance"
] | PERF: models with multithreading being slower than the same model with a single thread
While working on `skops`'s persistence, I realized sometimes it's faster for me to set `OMP_NUM_THREADS=1`.
I tried to isolate the issue. The differences here aren't large, and couldn't reproduce a massive difference, but in term... | 25,822 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25799 | [
"Needs Info"
] | Incorrect results in kernel density estimation (```KernelDensity```) when the kernel width is small
### Describe the bug
I have met an issue when using the class ```sklearn.neighbors.KernelDensity```. The **kernel density estimation (KDE)** works unusually when the kernel width is very small (less than 0.01),e.g., ... | 25,799 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25799 | [
"Needs Info"
] | Incorrect results in kernel density estimation (```KernelDensity```) when the kernel width is small
### Describe the bug
I have met an issue when using the class ```sklearn.neighbors.KernelDensity```. The **kernel density estimation (KDE)** works unusually when the kernel width is very small (less than 0.01),e.g., ... | 25,799 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25799 | [
"Needs Info"
] | Incorrect results in kernel density estimation (```KernelDensity```) when the kernel width is small
### Describe the bug
I have met an issue when using the class ```sklearn.neighbors.KernelDensity```. The **kernel density estimation (KDE)** works unusually when the kernel width is very small (less than 0.01),e.g., ... | 25,799 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25798 | [
"Bug",
"module:utils"
] | `check_array` can call `array.astype(None)`, raising ValueError if pandas extension types are present in a pd.DataFrame `array`
### Describe the bug
At [check_array](https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/blob/main/sklearn/utils/validation.py#L777), `dtype_orig` is determined for `array` objects that are pandas... | 25,798 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25798 | [
"Bug",
"module:utils"
] | `check_array` can call `array.astype(None)`, raising ValueError if pandas extension types are present in a pd.DataFrame `array`
### Describe the bug
At [check_array](https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/blob/main/sklearn/utils/validation.py#L777), `dtype_orig` is determined for `array` objects that are pandas... | 25,798 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25787 | [
"New Feature",
"Needs Triage"
] | Criteria for fixing connectivity in agglomerative clustering
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
Hi,
Great work on maintaining sklearn!
The current [fix_connectivity](https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/blob/2119490c10675839e546abfedba75d30bfbdc8ad/sklearn/cluster/hierarchical.py#L31) functi... | 25,787 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25787 | [
"New Feature",
"Needs Triage"
] | Criteria for fixing connectivity in agglomerative clustering
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
Hi,
Great work on maintaining sklearn!
The current [fix_connectivity](https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/blob/2119490c10675839e546abfedba75d30bfbdc8ad/sklearn/cluster/hierarchical.py#L31) functi... | 25,787 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25776 | [
"RFC",
"Breaking Change"
] | RFC: Breaking Changes for Version 2
A while ago we talked about the possibility of a version 2 with breaking changes. Specifically, this came up in the context of SLEP006: metadata routing, but there are other things we have wanted to break which we can do all in a single release. In this issue we can talk about the p... | 25,776 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25773 | [
"Documentation",
"module:metrics"
] | DOC: roc_auc_score wrong description of `average` parameter with `None` value
### Describe the issue linked to the documentation
Documentation of `sklearn.metrics.roc_auc_score` for `average` parameter ([lines 442-443](https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/blob/main/sklearn/metrics/_ranking.py#L442-L443) of ht... | 25,773 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25771 | [
"New Feature"
] | maximal information coefficient for feature selection
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
maximal information coeffcient
### Describe your proposed solution
maximal information coeffcient
### Describe alternatives you've considered, if relevant
_No response_
### Additional context
_No response_
COMMEN... | 25,771 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25771 | [
"New Feature"
] | maximal information coefficient for feature selection
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
maximal information coeffcient
### Describe your proposed solution
maximal information coeffcient
### Describe alternatives you've considered, if relevant
_No response_
### Additional context
_No response_
COMMEN... | 25,771 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25771 | [
"New Feature"
] | maximal information coefficient for feature selection
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
maximal information coeffcient
### Describe your proposed solution
maximal information coeffcient
### Describe alternatives you've considered, if relevant
_No response_
### Additional context
_No response_
COMMEN... | 25,771 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25771 | [
"New Feature"
] | maximal information coefficient for feature selection
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
maximal information coeffcient
### Describe your proposed solution
maximal information coeffcient
### Describe alternatives you've considered, if relevant
_No response_
### Additional context
_No response_
COMMEN... | 25,771 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25771 | [
"New Feature"
] | maximal information coefficient for feature selection
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
maximal information coeffcient
### Describe your proposed solution
maximal information coeffcient
### Describe alternatives you've considered, if relevant
_No response_
### Additional context
_No response_
COMMEN... | 25,771 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25771 | [
"New Feature"
] | maximal information coefficient for feature selection
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
maximal information coeffcient
### Describe your proposed solution
maximal information coeffcient
### Describe alternatives you've considered, if relevant
_No response_
### Additional context
_No response_
COMMEN... | 25,771 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25767 | [
"New Feature",
"API",
"module:gaussian_process"
] | Change default behavior of `GaussianProcessRegressor.sample_y`'s `random_state` variable.
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
I think it is misleading to have the `sample_y` method to default to reproduce the same sample every time it is called.
The default value for `random_state` should be `None`, and the... | 25,767 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25767 | [
"New Feature",
"API",
"module:gaussian_process"
] | Change default behavior of `GaussianProcessRegressor.sample_y`'s `random_state` variable.
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
I think it is misleading to have the `sample_y` method to default to reproduce the same sample every time it is called.
The default value for `random_state` should be `None`, and the... | 25,767 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25766 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | 1.2.1: cannot build documentation without installing module
### Describe the bug
Looks like something is wrong and I cannot build docuemtation without installing module.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
N/A
### Expected Results
It should be possible to build documentation out of only what is in source tree a d witho... | 25,766 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25766 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | 1.2.1: cannot build documentation without installing module
### Describe the bug
Looks like something is wrong and I cannot build docuemtation without installing module.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
N/A
### Expected Results
It should be possible to build documentation out of only what is in source tree a d witho... | 25,766 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25766 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | 1.2.1: cannot build documentation without installing module
### Describe the bug
Looks like something is wrong and I cannot build docuemtation without installing module.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
N/A
### Expected Results
It should be possible to build documentation out of only what is in source tree a d witho... | 25,766 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25766 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | 1.2.1: cannot build documentation without installing module
### Describe the bug
Looks like something is wrong and I cannot build docuemtation without installing module.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
N/A
### Expected Results
It should be possible to build documentation out of only what is in source tree a d witho... | 25,766 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25766 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | 1.2.1: cannot build documentation without installing module
### Describe the bug
Looks like something is wrong and I cannot build docuemtation without installing module.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
N/A
### Expected Results
It should be possible to build documentation out of only what is in source tree a d witho... | 25,766 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25766 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | 1.2.1: cannot build documentation without installing module
### Describe the bug
Looks like something is wrong and I cannot build docuemtation without installing module.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
N/A
### Expected Results
It should be possible to build documentation out of only what is in source tree a d witho... | 25,766 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25766 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | 1.2.1: cannot build documentation without installing module
### Describe the bug
Looks like something is wrong and I cannot build docuemtation without installing module.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
N/A
### Expected Results
It should be possible to build documentation out of only what is in source tree a d witho... | 25,766 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25766 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | 1.2.1: cannot build documentation without installing module
### Describe the bug
Looks like something is wrong and I cannot build docuemtation without installing module.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
N/A
### Expected Results
It should be possible to build documentation out of only what is in source tree a d witho... | 25,766 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25766 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | 1.2.1: cannot build documentation without installing module
### Describe the bug
Looks like something is wrong and I cannot build docuemtation without installing module.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
N/A
### Expected Results
It should be possible to build documentation out of only what is in source tree a d witho... | 25,766 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25766 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | 1.2.1: cannot build documentation without installing module
### Describe the bug
Looks like something is wrong and I cannot build docuemtation without installing module.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
N/A
### Expected Results
It should be possible to build documentation out of only what is in source tree a d witho... | 25,766 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25766 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | 1.2.1: cannot build documentation without installing module
### Describe the bug
Looks like something is wrong and I cannot build docuemtation without installing module.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
N/A
### Expected Results
It should be possible to build documentation out of only what is in source tree a d witho... | 25,766 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25766 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | 1.2.1: cannot build documentation without installing module
### Describe the bug
Looks like something is wrong and I cannot build docuemtation without installing module.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
N/A
### Expected Results
It should be possible to build documentation out of only what is in source tree a d witho... | 25,766 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25766 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | 1.2.1: cannot build documentation without installing module
### Describe the bug
Looks like something is wrong and I cannot build docuemtation without installing module.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
N/A
### Expected Results
It should be possible to build documentation out of only what is in source tree a d witho... | 25,766 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25766 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | 1.2.1: cannot build documentation without installing module
### Describe the bug
Looks like something is wrong and I cannot build docuemtation without installing module.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
N/A
### Expected Results
It should be possible to build documentation out of only what is in source tree a d witho... | 25,766 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25766 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | 1.2.1: cannot build documentation without installing module
### Describe the bug
Looks like something is wrong and I cannot build docuemtation without installing module.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
N/A
### Expected Results
It should be possible to build documentation out of only what is in source tree a d witho... | 25,766 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25766 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | 1.2.1: cannot build documentation without installing module
### Describe the bug
Looks like something is wrong and I cannot build docuemtation without installing module.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
N/A
### Expected Results
It should be possible to build documentation out of only what is in source tree a d witho... | 25,766 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25766 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | 1.2.1: cannot build documentation without installing module
### Describe the bug
Looks like something is wrong and I cannot build docuemtation without installing module.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
N/A
### Expected Results
It should be possible to build documentation out of only what is in source tree a d witho... | 25,766 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25766 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | 1.2.1: cannot build documentation without installing module
### Describe the bug
Looks like something is wrong and I cannot build docuemtation without installing module.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
N/A
### Expected Results
It should be possible to build documentation out of only what is in source tree a d witho... | 25,766 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25766 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | 1.2.1: cannot build documentation without installing module
### Describe the bug
Looks like something is wrong and I cannot build docuemtation without installing module.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
N/A
### Expected Results
It should be possible to build documentation out of only what is in source tree a d witho... | 25,766 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25766 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | 1.2.1: cannot build documentation without installing module
### Describe the bug
Looks like something is wrong and I cannot build docuemtation without installing module.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
N/A
### Expected Results
It should be possible to build documentation out of only what is in source tree a d witho... | 25,766 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25766 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | 1.2.1: cannot build documentation without installing module
### Describe the bug
Looks like something is wrong and I cannot build docuemtation without installing module.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
N/A
### Expected Results
It should be possible to build documentation out of only what is in source tree a d witho... | 25,766 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25766 | [
"Bug",
"Documentation",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | 1.2.1: cannot build documentation without installing module
### Describe the bug
Looks like something is wrong and I cannot build docuemtation without installing module.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
N/A
### Expected Results
It should be possible to build documentation out of only what is in source tree a d witho... | 25,766 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25763 | [
"Bug",
"Needs Triage"
] | BUG IsotonicRegression errors with set_config(transform_output="pandas")
### Describe the bug
`IsotonicRegression.predict` is broken by `set_config(transform_output="pandas")`. Mabye similar to #25365.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```python
import numpy as np
from sklearn.isotonic import IsotonicRegression
y = np... | 25,763 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25763 | [
"Bug",
"Needs Triage"
] | BUG IsotonicRegression errors with set_config(transform_output="pandas")
### Describe the bug
`IsotonicRegression.predict` is broken by `set_config(transform_output="pandas")`. Mabye similar to #25365.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```python
import numpy as np
from sklearn.isotonic import IsotonicRegression
y = np... | 25,763 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25763 | [
"Bug",
"Needs Triage"
] | BUG IsotonicRegression errors with set_config(transform_output="pandas")
### Describe the bug
`IsotonicRegression.predict` is broken by `set_config(transform_output="pandas")`. Mabye similar to #25365.
### Steps/Code to Reproduce
```python
import numpy as np
from sklearn.isotonic import IsotonicRegression
y = np... | 25,763 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25762 | [
"Documentation",
"Needs Triage"
] | BayesSearchCV default cv is wrong?
### Describe the issue linked to the documentation
Hi,
Is there a bug in the Docs for BayesSearchCV where it says that the default value for cv is 3 but I see it using 5 as the default when I run it with no explicit value for cv?
https://scikit-optimize.github.io/dev/modules/g... | 25,762 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25758 | [
"Needs Triage"
] | Hello All,
Hello All,
I am struggling to run on Windows 11 a package MicroLIA which is dependent on skikit-learn. Its not clear to me if the problem is on my side or other.
I unstalled and re-installed via the following
conda uninstall scikit-learn
conda install -c conda-forge scikit-learn
I get the follo... | 25,758 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25758 | [
"Needs Triage"
] | Hello All,
Hello All,
I am struggling to run on Windows 11 a package MicroLIA which is dependent on skikit-learn. Its not clear to me if the problem is on my side or other.
I unstalled and re-installed via the following
conda uninstall scikit-learn
conda install -c conda-forge scikit-learn
I get the follo... | 25,758 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25757 | [
"New Feature"
] | Allow `norm=None` in `preprocessing.Normalizer`
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
I would like to be able to set `norm=None` in `preprocessing.Normalizer`, so that I can eaily tune `norm` as part of a pipeline. Currently, `norm` can only be one of `{‘l1’, ‘l2’, ‘max’}`.
### Describe your proposed solutio... | 25,757 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25757 | [
"New Feature"
] | Allow `norm=None` in `preprocessing.Normalizer`
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
I would like to be able to set `norm=None` in `preprocessing.Normalizer`, so that I can eaily tune `norm` as part of a pipeline. Currently, `norm` can only be one of `{‘l1’, ‘l2’, ‘max’}`.
### Describe your proposed solutio... | 25,757 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.