html_url stringlengths 57 57 | labels listlengths 1 6 | text stringlengths 32 258k | issue_number int64 22.4k 33k |
|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25073 | [
"Bug"
] | ValueError: "Unknown label type: 'unknown'" when class column has Pandas type like Int64
### Describe the bug
I use Pandas to load data from CSV and transform it.
Pandas often parses integer columns as float, so I usually use `df = df.convert_dtypes()` to bring those columsn back to int.
It looks like this causes P... | 25,073 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25073 | [
"Bug"
] | ValueError: "Unknown label type: 'unknown'" when class column has Pandas type like Int64
### Describe the bug
I use Pandas to load data from CSV and transform it.
Pandas often parses integer columns as float, so I usually use `df = df.convert_dtypes()` to bring those columsn back to int.
It looks like this causes P... | 25,073 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25073 | [
"Bug"
] | ValueError: "Unknown label type: 'unknown'" when class column has Pandas type like Int64
### Describe the bug
I use Pandas to load data from CSV and transform it.
Pandas often parses integer columns as float, so I usually use `df = df.convert_dtypes()` to bring those columsn back to int.
It looks like this causes P... | 25,073 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25073 | [
"Bug"
] | ValueError: "Unknown label type: 'unknown'" when class column has Pandas type like Int64
### Describe the bug
I use Pandas to load data from CSV and transform it.
Pandas often parses integer columns as float, so I usually use `df = df.convert_dtypes()` to bring those columsn back to int.
It looks like this causes P... | 25,073 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25073 | [
"Bug"
] | ValueError: "Unknown label type: 'unknown'" when class column has Pandas type like Int64
### Describe the bug
I use Pandas to load data from CSV and transform it.
Pandas often parses integer columns as float, so I usually use `df = df.convert_dtypes()` to bring those columsn back to int.
It looks like this causes P... | 25,073 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25073 | [
"Bug"
] | ValueError: "Unknown label type: 'unknown'" when class column has Pandas type like Int64
### Describe the bug
I use Pandas to load data from CSV and transform it.
Pandas often parses integer columns as float, so I usually use `df = df.convert_dtypes()` to bring those columsn back to int.
It looks like this causes P... | 25,073 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25073 | [
"Bug"
] | ValueError: "Unknown label type: 'unknown'" when class column has Pandas type like Int64
### Describe the bug
I use Pandas to load data from CSV and transform it.
Pandas often parses integer columns as float, so I usually use `df = df.convert_dtypes()` to bring those columsn back to int.
It looks like this causes P... | 25,073 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25073 | [
"Bug"
] | ValueError: "Unknown label type: 'unknown'" when class column has Pandas type like Int64
### Describe the bug
I use Pandas to load data from CSV and transform it.
Pandas often parses integer columns as float, so I usually use `df = df.convert_dtypes()` to bring those columsn back to int.
It looks like this causes P... | 25,073 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25072 | [
"Build / CI"
] | ⚠️ CI failed on Linux_Nightly_PyPy.pypy3 ⚠️
**CI failed on [Linux_Nightly_PyPy.pypy3](https://dev.azure.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/_build/results?buildId=49433&view=logs&j=0b16f832-29d6-5b92-1c23-eb006f606a66)** (Nov 30, 2022)
Unable to find junit file. Please see link for details.
COMMENT:
## CI is no longer fail... | 25,072 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25072 | [
"Build / CI"
] | ⚠️ CI failed on Linux_Nightly_PyPy.pypy3 ⚠️
**CI failed on [Linux_Nightly_PyPy.pypy3](https://dev.azure.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/_build/results?buildId=49433&view=logs&j=0b16f832-29d6-5b92-1c23-eb006f606a66)** (Nov 30, 2022)
Unable to find junit file. Please see link for details.
COMMENT:
Nice. | 25,072 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25070 | [
"Needs Triage"
] | logistic regression - Setting penalty equal to L2 regularization when user has specified penalty as none
Hello - I believe that there is a mistake here. When a user sets penalty to 'none' or None, the penalty is then set to l2 with absolutely no indication to the user... with this implementation, there is no way we ar... | 25,070 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25070 | [
"Needs Triage"
] | logistic regression - Setting penalty equal to L2 regularization when user has specified penalty as none
Hello - I believe that there is a mistake here. When a user sets penalty to 'none' or None, the penalty is then set to l2 with absolutely no indication to the user... with this implementation, there is no way we ar... | 25,070 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25069 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Enabling auto-merge builtin Github functionality
The main advantage would be to be able to say on a per-PR basis "this PR can be merged when CI is green". See the [doc](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/incorporating-changes-from-a-pull-request/automatically-merging-a-pull-r... | 25,069 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25069 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Enabling auto-merge builtin Github functionality
The main advantage would be to be able to say on a per-PR basis "this PR can be merged when CI is green". See the [doc](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/incorporating-changes-from-a-pull-request/automatically-merging-a-pull-r... | 25,069 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25069 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Enabling auto-merge builtin Github functionality
The main advantage would be to be able to say on a per-PR basis "this PR can be merged when CI is green". See the [doc](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/incorporating-changes-from-a-pull-request/automatically-merging-a-pull-r... | 25,069 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25069 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Enabling auto-merge builtin Github functionality
The main advantage would be to be able to say on a per-PR basis "this PR can be merged when CI is green". See the [doc](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/incorporating-changes-from-a-pull-request/automatically-merging-a-pull-r... | 25,069 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25069 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Enabling auto-merge builtin Github functionality
The main advantage would be to be able to say on a per-PR basis "this PR can be merged when CI is green". See the [doc](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/incorporating-changes-from-a-pull-request/automatically-merging-a-pull-r... | 25,069 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25069 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Enabling auto-merge builtin Github functionality
The main advantage would be to be able to say on a per-PR basis "this PR can be merged when CI is green". See the [doc](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/incorporating-changes-from-a-pull-request/automatically-merging-a-pull-r... | 25,069 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25069 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Enabling auto-merge builtin Github functionality
The main advantage would be to be able to say on a per-PR basis "this PR can be merged when CI is green". See the [doc](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/incorporating-changes-from-a-pull-request/automatically-merging-a-pull-r... | 25,069 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25069 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Enabling auto-merge builtin Github functionality
The main advantage would be to be able to say on a per-PR basis "this PR can be merged when CI is green". See the [doc](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/incorporating-changes-from-a-pull-request/automatically-merging-a-pull-r... | 25,069 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25069 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Enabling auto-merge builtin Github functionality
The main advantage would be to be able to say on a per-PR basis "this PR can be merged when CI is green". See the [doc](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/incorporating-changes-from-a-pull-request/automatically-merging-a-pull-r... | 25,069 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25069 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Enabling auto-merge builtin Github functionality
The main advantage would be to be able to say on a per-PR basis "this PR can be merged when CI is green". See the [doc](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/incorporating-changes-from-a-pull-request/automatically-merging-a-pull-r... | 25,069 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25069 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Enabling auto-merge builtin Github functionality
The main advantage would be to be able to say on a per-PR basis "this PR can be merged when CI is green". See the [doc](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/incorporating-changes-from-a-pull-request/automatically-merging-a-pull-r... | 25,069 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25069 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Enabling auto-merge builtin Github functionality
The main advantage would be to be able to say on a per-PR basis "this PR can be merged when CI is green". See the [doc](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/incorporating-changes-from-a-pull-request/automatically-merging-a-pull-r... | 25,069 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25069 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Enabling auto-merge builtin Github functionality
The main advantage would be to be able to say on a per-PR basis "this PR can be merged when CI is green". See the [doc](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/incorporating-changes-from-a-pull-request/automatically-merging-a-pull-r... | 25,069 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25069 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Enabling auto-merge builtin Github functionality
The main advantage would be to be able to say on a per-PR basis "this PR can be merged when CI is green". See the [doc](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/incorporating-changes-from-a-pull-request/automatically-merging-a-pull-r... | 25,069 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25068 | [
"RFC"
] | RFC Consolidating synchronous communication to one venue
Tl;DR: scikit-learn development discussions now take place in [the #development channel on discord](https://discord.com/channels/731163543038197871/1046822941586898974). Please don't use the [gitter channel](https://gitter.im/scikit-learn/dev) anymore.
Discor... | 25,068 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25066 | [
"Bug"
] | `KMeans.predict` wrongly exposes a `sample_weight` argument
### Describe the issue linked to the documentation
It's more an UX issue than a documentation issue maybe ?
`sample_weight` should not be passed to `predict`, weights of sample are not related to how far samples are from centers, which is what `predict`... | 25,066 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25066 | [
"Bug"
] | `KMeans.predict` wrongly exposes a `sample_weight` argument
### Describe the issue linked to the documentation
It's more an UX issue than a documentation issue maybe ?
`sample_weight` should not be passed to `predict`, weights of sample are not related to how far samples are from centers, which is what `predict`... | 25,066 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25066 | [
"Bug"
] | `KMeans.predict` wrongly exposes a `sample_weight` argument
### Describe the issue linked to the documentation
It's more an UX issue than a documentation issue maybe ?
`sample_weight` should not be passed to `predict`, weights of sample are not related to how far samples are from centers, which is what `predict`... | 25,066 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25058 | [
"New Feature",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | `parameters_to_validate` to allow for partial validation in validation framework
In some PRs for adding validation to functions: https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/24924 or https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/25026, there will be double validation, by the function and another by the estima... | 25,058 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25058 | [
"New Feature",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | `parameters_to_validate` to allow for partial validation in validation framework
In some PRs for adding validation to functions: https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/24924 or https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/25026, there will be double validation, by the function and another by the estima... | 25,058 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25058 | [
"New Feature",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | `parameters_to_validate` to allow for partial validation in validation framework
In some PRs for adding validation to functions: https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/24924 or https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/25026, there will be double validation, by the function and another by the estima... | 25,058 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25058 | [
"New Feature",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | `parameters_to_validate` to allow for partial validation in validation framework
In some PRs for adding validation to functions: https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/24924 or https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/25026, there will be double validation, by the function and another by the estima... | 25,058 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25058 | [
"New Feature",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | `parameters_to_validate` to allow for partial validation in validation framework
In some PRs for adding validation to functions: https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/24924 or https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/25026, there will be double validation, by the function and another by the estima... | 25,058 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25058 | [
"New Feature",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | `parameters_to_validate` to allow for partial validation in validation framework
In some PRs for adding validation to functions: https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/24924 or https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/25026, there will be double validation, by the function and another by the estima... | 25,058 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25052 | [
"Bug",
"module:impute"
] | IterativeImputer has no parameter "fill_value"
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
In the first imputation round of `IterativeImputer`, an initial value needs to be set for the missing values. From its [docs](https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.impute.IterativeImputer.html):
> **in... | 25,052 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25052 | [
"Bug",
"module:impute"
] | IterativeImputer has no parameter "fill_value"
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
In the first imputation round of `IterativeImputer`, an initial value needs to be set for the missing values. From its [docs](https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.impute.IterativeImputer.html):
> **in... | 25,052 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25052 | [
"Bug",
"module:impute"
] | IterativeImputer has no parameter "fill_value"
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
In the first imputation round of `IterativeImputer`, an initial value needs to be set for the missing values. From its [docs](https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.impute.IterativeImputer.html):
> **in... | 25,052 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25052 | [
"Bug",
"module:impute"
] | IterativeImputer has no parameter "fill_value"
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
In the first imputation round of `IterativeImputer`, an initial value needs to be set for the missing values. From its [docs](https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.impute.IterativeImputer.html):
> **in... | 25,052 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25052 | [
"Bug",
"module:impute"
] | IterativeImputer has no parameter "fill_value"
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
In the first imputation round of `IterativeImputer`, an initial value needs to be set for the missing values. From its [docs](https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.impute.IterativeImputer.html):
> **in... | 25,052 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25052 | [
"Bug",
"module:impute"
] | IterativeImputer has no parameter "fill_value"
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
In the first imputation round of `IterativeImputer`, an initial value needs to be set for the missing values. From its [docs](https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.impute.IterativeImputer.html):
> **in... | 25,052 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25050 | [
"New Feature",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | Davies-Bouldin Index implementation is incomplete
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
The DB-Index has two parameters, p and q, where p is the power of the Minkowski norm used to compute the distance of cluster centers, while q controls the power mean for the "radius" / scatter. p=q=2 is probably the most me... | 25,050 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25050 | [
"New Feature",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | Davies-Bouldin Index implementation is incomplete
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
The DB-Index has two parameters, p and q, where p is the power of the Minkowski norm used to compute the distance of cluster centers, while q controls the power mean for the "radius" / scatter. p=q=2 is probably the most me... | 25,050 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25050 | [
"New Feature",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | Davies-Bouldin Index implementation is incomplete
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
The DB-Index has two parameters, p and q, where p is the power of the Minkowski norm used to compute the distance of cluster centers, while q controls the power mean for the "radius" / scatter. p=q=2 is probably the most me... | 25,050 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25050 | [
"New Feature",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | Davies-Bouldin Index implementation is incomplete
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
The DB-Index has two parameters, p and q, where p is the power of the Minkowski norm used to compute the distance of cluster centers, while q controls the power mean for the "radius" / scatter. p=q=2 is probably the most me... | 25,050 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25050 | [
"New Feature",
"Needs Decision - Include Feature"
] | Davies-Bouldin Index implementation is incomplete
### Describe the workflow you want to enable
The DB-Index has two parameters, p and q, where p is the power of the Minkowski norm used to compute the distance of cluster centers, while q controls the power mean for the "radius" / scatter. p=q=2 is probably the most me... | 25,050 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25038 | [
"Bug",
"module:decomposition"
] | Instability in fastica for float32
Originally seen in https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/24131#issuecomment-1208091119 for more details on a single random seed and only for Atlas but I have managed to reproduce with OpenBLAS see below.
For now we have a work-around for the CI in #24198 but it is st... | 25,038 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25038 | [
"Bug",
"module:decomposition"
] | Instability in fastica for float32
Originally seen in https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/24131#issuecomment-1208091119 for more details on a single random seed and only for Atlas but I have managed to reproduce with OpenBLAS see below.
For now we have a work-around for the CI in #24198 but it is st... | 25,038 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25038 | [
"Bug",
"module:decomposition"
] | Instability in fastica for float32
Originally seen in https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/24131#issuecomment-1208091119 for more details on a single random seed and only for Atlas but I have managed to reproduce with OpenBLAS see below.
For now we have a work-around for the CI in #24198 but it is st... | 25,038 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25031 | [
"Documentation",
"module:neural_network"
] | MLP Classifier
### Describe the issue linked to the documentation
in the argument of MLP:
hidden_layer_sizes : tuple, length = n_layers - 2, default=(100,)
The ith element represents the number of neurons in the ith
hidden layer.
we are allowed to input a tuple (a,b) for hidden_layer_sizes. B... | 25,031 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25031 | [
"Documentation",
"module:neural_network"
] | MLP Classifier
### Describe the issue linked to the documentation
in the argument of MLP:
hidden_layer_sizes : tuple, length = n_layers - 2, default=(100,)
The ith element represents the number of neurons in the ith
hidden layer.
we are allowed to input a tuple (a,b) for hidden_layer_sizes. B... | 25,031 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25030 | [
"Needs Triage"
] | ⚠️ CI failed on Linux_Nightly_PyPy.pypy3 ⚠️
**CI failed on [Linux_Nightly_PyPy.pypy3](https://dev.azure.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/_build/results?buildId=49279&view=logs&j=0b16f832-29d6-5b92-1c23-eb006f606a66)** (Nov 25, 2022)
Unable to find junit file. Please see link for details.
COMMENT:
Looks similar to previo... | 25,030 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25029 | [
"Needs Triage"
] | ⚠️ CI failed on Linux_Nightly.pylatest_pip_scipy_dev ⚠️
**CI failed on [Linux_Nightly.pylatest_pip_scipy_dev](https://dev.azure.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/_build/results?buildId=49279&view=logs&j=dfe99b15-50db-5d7b-b1e9-4105c42527cf)** (Nov 25, 2022)
- test_check_pandas_sparse_valid[int0-long-integer]
COMMENT:
Rep... | 25,029 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25029 | [
"Needs Triage"
] | ⚠️ CI failed on Linux_Nightly.pylatest_pip_scipy_dev ⚠️
**CI failed on [Linux_Nightly.pylatest_pip_scipy_dev](https://dev.azure.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/_build/results?buildId=49279&view=logs&j=dfe99b15-50db-5d7b-b1e9-4105c42527cf)** (Nov 25, 2022)
- test_check_pandas_sparse_valid[int0-long-integer]
COMMENT:
clo... | 25,029 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25024 | [
"Easy",
"good first issue",
"help wanted"
] | Fix broken links in the documentation
A follow-up of https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/23631.
**If you want to work on this**, please:
- do **one Pull Request per link**
- **add a comment in this issue saying which link you want to tackle** so that different people can work on this issue in para... | 25,024 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25024 | [
"Easy",
"good first issue",
"help wanted"
] | Fix broken links in the documentation
A follow-up of https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/23631.
**If you want to work on this**, please:
- do **one Pull Request per link**
- **add a comment in this issue saying which link you want to tackle** so that different people can work on this issue in para... | 25,024 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25024 | [
"Easy",
"good first issue",
"help wanted"
] | Fix broken links in the documentation
A follow-up of https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/23631.
**If you want to work on this**, please:
- do **one Pull Request per link**
- **add a comment in this issue saying which link you want to tackle** so that different people can work on this issue in para... | 25,024 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25024 | [
"Easy",
"good first issue",
"help wanted"
] | Fix broken links in the documentation
A follow-up of https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/23631.
**If you want to work on this**, please:
- do **one Pull Request per link**
- **add a comment in this issue saying which link you want to tackle** so that different people can work on this issue in para... | 25,024 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25024 | [
"Easy",
"good first issue",
"help wanted"
] | Fix broken links in the documentation
A follow-up of https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/23631.
**If you want to work on this**, please:
- do **one Pull Request per link**
- **add a comment in this issue saying which link you want to tackle** so that different people can work on this issue in para... | 25,024 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25024 | [
"Easy",
"good first issue",
"help wanted"
] | Fix broken links in the documentation
A follow-up of https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/23631.
**If you want to work on this**, please:
- do **one Pull Request per link**
- **add a comment in this issue saying which link you want to tackle** so that different people can work on this issue in para... | 25,024 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25024 | [
"Easy",
"good first issue",
"help wanted"
] | Fix broken links in the documentation
A follow-up of https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/23631.
**If you want to work on this**, please:
- do **one Pull Request per link**
- **add a comment in this issue saying which link you want to tackle** so that different people can work on this issue in para... | 25,024 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25024 | [
"Easy",
"good first issue",
"help wanted"
] | Fix broken links in the documentation
A follow-up of https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/23631.
**If you want to work on this**, please:
- do **one Pull Request per link**
- **add a comment in this issue saying which link you want to tackle** so that different people can work on this issue in para... | 25,024 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25024 | [
"Easy",
"good first issue",
"help wanted"
] | Fix broken links in the documentation
A follow-up of https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/23631.
**If you want to work on this**, please:
- do **one Pull Request per link**
- **add a comment in this issue saying which link you want to tackle** so that different people can work on this issue in para... | 25,024 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25024 | [
"Easy",
"good first issue",
"help wanted"
] | Fix broken links in the documentation
A follow-up of https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/23631.
**If you want to work on this**, please:
- do **one Pull Request per link**
- **add a comment in this issue saying which link you want to tackle** so that different people can work on this issue in para... | 25,024 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25024 | [
"Easy",
"good first issue",
"help wanted"
] | Fix broken links in the documentation
A follow-up of https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/23631.
**If you want to work on this**, please:
- do **one Pull Request per link**
- **add a comment in this issue saying which link you want to tackle** so that different people can work on this issue in para... | 25,024 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25024 | [
"Easy",
"good first issue",
"help wanted"
] | Fix broken links in the documentation
A follow-up of https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/23631.
**If you want to work on this**, please:
- do **one Pull Request per link**
- **add a comment in this issue saying which link you want to tackle** so that different people can work on this issue in para... | 25,024 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25024 | [
"Easy",
"good first issue",
"help wanted"
] | Fix broken links in the documentation
A follow-up of https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/23631.
**If you want to work on this**, please:
- do **one Pull Request per link**
- **add a comment in this issue saying which link you want to tackle** so that different people can work on this issue in para... | 25,024 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25024 | [
"Easy",
"good first issue",
"help wanted"
] | Fix broken links in the documentation
A follow-up of https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/23631.
**If you want to work on this**, please:
- do **one Pull Request per link**
- **add a comment in this issue saying which link you want to tackle** so that different people can work on this issue in para... | 25,024 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25022 | [
"module:cluster"
] | Reconsider the change for `n_init` in `KMeans` and `MiniBatchKMeans`
I open this PR to reconsider the changes introduced in #23038.
We decided to use a single initialization when using `init="kmeans++`. In the original issue (#9729), it seems that we based our choice on two aspects:
1. the default parameter used... | 25,022 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25022 | [
"module:cluster"
] | Reconsider the change for `n_init` in `KMeans` and `MiniBatchKMeans`
I open this PR to reconsider the changes introduced in #23038.
We decided to use a single initialization when using `init="kmeans++`. In the original issue (#9729), it seems that we based our choice on two aspects:
1. the default parameter used... | 25,022 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25022 | [
"module:cluster"
] | Reconsider the change for `n_init` in `KMeans` and `MiniBatchKMeans`
I open this PR to reconsider the changes introduced in #23038.
We decided to use a single initialization when using `init="kmeans++`. In the original issue (#9729), it seems that we based our choice on two aspects:
1. the default parameter used... | 25,022 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25022 | [
"module:cluster"
] | Reconsider the change for `n_init` in `KMeans` and `MiniBatchKMeans`
I open this PR to reconsider the changes introduced in #23038.
We decided to use a single initialization when using `init="kmeans++`. In the original issue (#9729), it seems that we based our choice on two aspects:
1. the default parameter used... | 25,022 |
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25022 | [
"module:cluster"
] | Reconsider the change for `n_init` in `KMeans` and `MiniBatchKMeans`
I open this PR to reconsider the changes introduced in #23038.
We decided to use a single initialization when using `init="kmeans++`. In the original issue (#9729), it seems that we based our choice on two aspects:
1. the default parameter used... | 25,022 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.