Task int64 1 6 | Subtask int64 1 18 | VolumeName stringlengths 18 22 | Question stringlengths 18 296 | Answer stringlengths 2 112 | QuestionType stringclasses 2
values | AnswerChoice stringclasses 5
values | Choice A stringclasses 3
values | Choice B stringclasses 3
values | Choice C stringclasses 2
values | Choice D stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 | 1 | train_122_c_1.nii.gz | Prior emphysema timeline: [1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of emphysema based on prior sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_122_c_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of hiatal hernia: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is hiatal hernia classified now using past sequence data? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_122_c_1.nii.gz | Scans showed coronary artery wall calcification as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does coronary artery wall calcification currently represent, based on past sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_122_c_1.nii.gz | pericardial effusion progression: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does pericardial effusion appear now compared to its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_122_c_1.nii.gz | cardiomegaly over time: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of cardiomegaly based on prior sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_122_c_1.nii.gz | consolidation trend was: [1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is consolidation in the current CT? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_122_c_1.nii.gz | atelectasis had: [1, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does atelectasis appear now compared to its sequence history? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_122_c_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for lung opacity: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is lung opacity now, given its temporal sequence? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12378_c_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for peribronchial thickening: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to peribronchial thickening in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12378_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed coronary artery wall calcification as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is coronary artery wall calcification classified now using past sequence data? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12378_c_1.nii.gz | mosaic attenuation pattern had: [0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for mosaic attenuation pattern considering its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12378_c_1.nii.gz | Previous arterial wall calcification states: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of arterial wall calcification based on prior sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12378_c_1.nii.gz | Scans showed interlobular septal thickening as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has interlobular septal thickening evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12378_c_1.nii.gz | bronchiectasis progression: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of bronchiectasis? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12378_c_1.nii.gz | consolidation over time: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of consolidation? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12378_c_1.nii.gz | Prior pleural effusion timeline: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes pleural effusion? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12378_c_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for lung opacity: [1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does lung opacity currently represent, based on past sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12378_c_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for lung nodule: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is lung nodule now, given its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12378_c_1.nii.gz | In past, emphysema was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of emphysema based on previous sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12378_c_1.nii.gz | Before now, lymphadenopathy showed [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has lymphadenopathy changed from past sequences to the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12378_c_1.nii.gz | Historical hiatal hernia status: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of hiatal hernia? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12378_c_1.nii.gz | pericardial effusion trend was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does pericardial effusion currently represent, based on past sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12378_c_1.nii.gz | pulmonary fibrotic sequela condition history: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is pulmonary fibrotic sequela in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12378_c_1.nii.gz | atelectasis sequence was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about atelectasis based on earlier sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12378_c_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for cardiomegaly: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does cardiomegaly appear now compared to its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12460_c_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for hiatal hernia: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about hiatal hernia based on earlier sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12460_c_1.nii.gz | lymphadenopathy trend was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is lymphadenopathy now, given its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12460_c_1.nii.gz | bronchiectasis had: [0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of bronchiectasis based on prior sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12460_c_1.nii.gz | Scans showed arterial wall calcification as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is arterial wall calcification classified now using past sequence data? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12460_c_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of cardiomegaly: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of cardiomegaly? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12460_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier pericardial effusion sequences: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has pericardial effusion changed from past sequences to the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12460_c_1.nii.gz | Previous coronary artery wall calcification states: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of coronary artery wall calcification based on previous sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12460_c_1.nii.gz | peribronchial thickening condition history: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has peribronchial thickening evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12460_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed emphysema as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is emphysema in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12460_c_1.nii.gz | Before now, lung opacity showed [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for lung opacity considering its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12460_c_1.nii.gz | In past, pulmonary fibrotic sequela was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to pulmonary fibrotic sequela in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12460_c_1.nii.gz | pleural effusion sequence was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of pleural effusion? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12460_c_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for mosaic attenuation pattern: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of mosaic attenuation pattern? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12460_c_1.nii.gz | Prior consolidation timeline: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has consolidation progressed according to its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12460_c_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for interlobular septal thickening: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does interlobular septal thickening appear now compared to its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12460_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed lung nodule as: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has lung nodule evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12460_c_1.nii.gz | Historical atelectasis status: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes atelectasis? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_1246_c_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for cardiomegaly: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to cardiomegaly in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_1246_c_1.nii.gz | bronchiectasis sequence was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does bronchiectasis appear now compared to its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_1246_c_1.nii.gz | Previous consolidation states: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is consolidation in the current CT? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_1246_c_1.nii.gz | In past, peribronchial thickening was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of peribronchial thickening based on prior sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_1246_c_1.nii.gz | Before now, mosaic attenuation pattern showed [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has mosaic attenuation pattern progressed according to its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_1246_c_1.nii.gz | pleural effusion over time: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about pleural effusion based on earlier sequences? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_1246_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier pulmonary fibrotic sequela sequences: [0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is pulmonary fibrotic sequela now, given its temporal sequence? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_1246_c_1.nii.gz | Scans showed lung nodule as: [1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of lung nodule based on previous sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_1246_c_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of lung opacity: [0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about lung opacity based on earlier sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_1246_c_1.nii.gz | atelectasis progression: [1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has atelectasis changed from past sequences to the current CT? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_1246_c_1.nii.gz | emphysema over time: [0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of emphysema? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_1246_c_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for lymphadenopathy: [0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is lymphadenopathy classified now using past sequence data? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_1246_c_1.nii.gz | Historical hiatal hernia status: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has hiatal hernia evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_1246_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed coronary artery wall calcification as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of coronary artery wall calcification? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_1246_c_1.nii.gz | pericardial effusion trend was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of pericardial effusion? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_1246_c_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for interlobular septal thickening: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does interlobular septal thickening currently represent, based on past sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_1246_c_1.nii.gz | Previous arterial wall calcification states: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for arterial wall calcification considering its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12476_c_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for lung nodule: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does lung nodule currently represent, based on past sequences? | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | Close | C | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12476_c_1.nii.gz | Prior interlobular septal thickening timeline: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has interlobular septal thickening changed from past sequences to the current CT? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12476_c_1.nii.gz | Previous bronchiectasis states: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is bronchiectasis now, given its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12476_c_1.nii.gz | consolidation condition history: [0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of consolidation? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12476_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier mosaic attenuation pattern sequences: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about mosaic attenuation pattern based on earlier sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12476_c_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for pleural effusion: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is pleural effusion classified now using past sequence data? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12476_c_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of pulmonary fibrotic sequela: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of pulmonary fibrotic sequela based on previous sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12476_c_1.nii.gz | lung opacity sequence was: [0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does lung opacity currently represent, based on past sequences? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12476_c_1.nii.gz | Scans showed atelectasis as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has atelectasis changed from past sequences to the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12476_c_1.nii.gz | hiatal hernia over time: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is hiatal hernia classified now using past sequence data? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12476_c_1.nii.gz | Historical peribronchial thickening status: [1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of peribronchial thickening based on previous sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12476_c_1.nii.gz | In past, pericardial effusion was: [0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does pericardial effusion appear now compared to its sequence history? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12476_c_1.nii.gz | cardiomegaly had: [0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does cardiomegaly appear now compared to its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12476_c_1.nii.gz | Prior arterial wall calcification timeline: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of arterial wall calcification based on prior sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12476_c_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for coronary artery wall calcification: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does coronary artery wall calcification currently represent, based on past sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12476_c_1.nii.gz | emphysema progression: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of emphysema? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12476_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed lymphadenopathy as: [0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has lymphadenopathy changed from past sequences to the current CT? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12488_c_1.nii.gz | Previous peribronchial thickening states: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes peribronchial thickening? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12488_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier mosaic attenuation pattern sequences: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is mosaic attenuation pattern in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12488_c_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of pleural effusion: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is pleural effusion now, given its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12488_c_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for coronary artery wall calcification: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of coronary artery wall calcification based on prior sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12488_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed interlobular septal thickening as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of interlobular septal thickening? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12488_c_1.nii.gz | bronchiectasis trend was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to bronchiectasis in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12488_c_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for consolidation: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for consolidation considering its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12488_c_1.nii.gz | Scans showed pulmonary fibrotic sequela as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about pulmonary fibrotic sequela based on earlier sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12488_c_1.nii.gz | Before now, arterial wall calcification showed [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of arterial wall calcification? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12488_c_1.nii.gz | lung opacity progression: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of lung opacity based on previous sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12488_c_1.nii.gz | hiatal hernia condition history: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does hiatal hernia appear now compared to its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12488_c_1.nii.gz | lung nodule over time: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has lung nodule changed from past sequences to the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12488_c_1.nii.gz | emphysema had: [0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is emphysema classified now using past sequence data? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12488_c_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for atelectasis: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of atelectasis? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12488_c_1.nii.gz | In past, cardiomegaly was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has cardiomegaly evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12488_c_1.nii.gz | Prior lymphadenopathy timeline: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does lymphadenopathy currently represent, based on past sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12488_c_1.nii.gz | pericardial effusion sequence was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has pericardial effusion progressed according to its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12497_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed pulmonary fibrotic sequela as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of pulmonary fibrotic sequela? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12497_c_1.nii.gz | lymphadenopathy trend was: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has lymphadenopathy evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12497_c_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of cardiomegaly: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is cardiomegaly in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12497_c_1.nii.gz | Historical lung nodule status: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of lung nodule based on prior sequences? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12497_c_1.nii.gz | lung opacity trend was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of lung opacity? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12497_c_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for hiatal hernia: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to hiatal hernia in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_12497_c_1.nii.gz | Historical pleural effusion status: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has pleural effusion evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.