Task int64 1 6 | Subtask int64 1 18 | VolumeName stringlengths 18 22 | Question stringlengths 18 296 | Answer stringlengths 2 112 | QuestionType stringclasses 2
values | AnswerChoice stringclasses 5
values | Choice A stringclasses 3
values | Choice B stringclasses 3
values | Choice C stringclasses 2
values | Choice D stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 | 1 | train_13119_c_1.nii.gz | pleural effusion trend was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is pleural effusion classified now using past sequence data? | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | Close | C | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13158_c_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for emphysema: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of emphysema? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13158_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed lymphadenopathy as: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes lymphadenopathy? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13158_c_1.nii.gz | atelectasis condition history: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of atelectasis? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13158_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed arterial wall calcification as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is arterial wall calcification now, given its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13158_c_1.nii.gz | Historical cardiomegaly status: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is cardiomegaly in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13158_c_1.nii.gz | lung nodule sequence was: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does lung nodule currently represent, based on past sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13158_c_1.nii.gz | Before now, pericardial effusion showed [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes pericardial effusion? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13158_c_1.nii.gz | In past, coronary artery wall calcification was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for coronary artery wall calcification considering its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13158_c_1.nii.gz | hiatal hernia sequence was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to hiatal hernia in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13158_c_1.nii.gz | mosaic attenuation pattern condition history: [1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of mosaic attenuation pattern? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13158_c_1.nii.gz | Prior pulmonary fibrotic sequela timeline: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has pulmonary fibrotic sequela evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13158_c_1.nii.gz | pleural effusion had: [0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has pleural effusion progressed according to its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13158_c_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for peribronchial thickening: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of peribronchial thickening based on prior sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13158_c_1.nii.gz | Scans showed interlobular septal thickening as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is interlobular septal thickening classified now using past sequence data? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13158_c_1.nii.gz | consolidation over time: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does consolidation appear now compared to its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13158_c_1.nii.gz | bronchiectasis progression: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does bronchiectasis currently represent, based on past sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13158_c_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for lung opacity: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is lung opacity classified now using past sequence data? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13233_c_1.nii.gz | Previous coronary artery wall calcification states: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is coronary artery wall calcification now, given its temporal sequence? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13233_c_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of interlobular septal thickening: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of interlobular septal thickening based on prior sequences? | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | Close | C | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13233_c_1.nii.gz | hiatal hernia sequence was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of hiatal hernia based on prior sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13233_c_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for emphysema: [1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is emphysema in the current CT? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13233_c_1.nii.gz | Prior bronchiectasis timeline: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is bronchiectasis classified now using past sequence data? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13233_c_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of arterial wall calcification: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of arterial wall calcification based on previous sequences? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13233_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier cardiomegaly sequences: [0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about cardiomegaly based on earlier sequences? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13233_c_1.nii.gz | In past, pericardial effusion was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has pericardial effusion progressed according to its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13233_c_1.nii.gz | lymphadenopathy progression: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has lymphadenopathy evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | Close | C | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13233_c_1.nii.gz | Prior lung opacity timeline: [0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of lung opacity based on previous sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13233_c_1.nii.gz | pulmonary fibrotic sequela had: [0, 1] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about pulmonary fibrotic sequela based on earlier sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13233_c_1.nii.gz | Scans showed pleural effusion as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has pleural effusion progressed according to its temporal sequence? | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | Close | C | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13233_c_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for mosaic attenuation pattern: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does mosaic attenuation pattern appear now compared to its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13233_c_1.nii.gz | peribronchial thickening condition history: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does peribronchial thickening currently represent, based on past sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13233_c_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for consolidation: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is consolidation now, given its temporal sequence? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13233_c_1.nii.gz | atelectasis trend was: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes atelectasis? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13233_c_1.nii.gz | lung nodule condition history: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has lung nodule changed from past sequences to the current CT? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13279_c_1.nii.gz | Before now, atelectasis showed [0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of atelectasis? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13279_c_1.nii.gz | Historical emphysema status: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of emphysema? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13279_c_1.nii.gz | lymphadenopathy condition history: [1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of lymphadenopathy based on previous sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13279_c_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for mosaic attenuation pattern: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does mosaic attenuation pattern appear now compared to its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13279_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed coronary artery wall calcification as: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to coronary artery wall calcification in the current CT? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13279_c_1.nii.gz | Scans showed pericardial effusion as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of pericardial effusion? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13279_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier lung nodule sequences: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has lung nodule progressed according to its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13279_c_1.nii.gz | bronchiectasis trend was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does bronchiectasis currently represent, based on past sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13279_c_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of hiatal hernia: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has hiatal hernia evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13279_c_1.nii.gz | cardiomegaly progression: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of cardiomegaly? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13279_c_1.nii.gz | Prior pleural effusion timeline: [0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about pleural effusion based on earlier sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13279_c_1.nii.gz | peribronchial thickening had: [0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of peribronchial thickening? | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | Close | C | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13279_c_1.nii.gz | consolidation had: [0, 1] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is consolidation now, given its temporal sequence? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13279_c_1.nii.gz | Prior lung opacity timeline: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to lung opacity in the current CT? | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | Close | C | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13279_c_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for interlobular septal thickening: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of interlobular septal thickening? | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | Close | C | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13279_c_1.nii.gz | arterial wall calcification trend was: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for arterial wall calcification considering its sequence history? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13279_c_1.nii.gz | Previous pulmonary fibrotic sequela states: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of pulmonary fibrotic sequela based on prior sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13470_c_1.nii.gz | In past, lung nodule was: [0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does lung nodule appear now compared to its sequence history? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13470_c_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of lung opacity: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of lung opacity? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13470_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed arterial wall calcification as: [0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has arterial wall calcification evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13470_c_1.nii.gz | cardiomegaly had: [0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is cardiomegaly now, given its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13470_c_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for pericardial effusion: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is pericardial effusion in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13470_c_1.nii.gz | Historical coronary artery wall calcification status: [0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has coronary artery wall calcification progressed according to its temporal sequence? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13470_c_1.nii.gz | Before now, atelectasis showed [0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of atelectasis based on prior sequences? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13470_c_1.nii.gz | In past, mosaic attenuation pattern was: [1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about mosaic attenuation pattern based on earlier sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13470_c_1.nii.gz | hiatal hernia over time: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes hiatal hernia? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13470_c_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for pulmonary fibrotic sequela: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to pulmonary fibrotic sequela in the current CT? | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | Close | C | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13470_c_1.nii.gz | Previous peribronchial thickening states: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has peribronchial thickening evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13470_c_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for consolidation: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has consolidation progressed according to its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13470_c_1.nii.gz | bronchiectasis trend was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of bronchiectasis based on prior sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13470_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed interlobular septal thickening as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does interlobular septal thickening appear now compared to its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13470_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier pleural effusion sequences: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of pleural effusion? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13470_c_1.nii.gz | lymphadenopathy progression: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for lymphadenopathy considering its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13470_c_1.nii.gz | Scans showed emphysema as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to emphysema in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13471_c_1.nii.gz | In past, pericardial effusion was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of pericardial effusion? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13471_c_1.nii.gz | Previous consolidation states: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has consolidation progressed according to its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13471_c_1.nii.gz | Historical arterial wall calcification status: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does arterial wall calcification currently represent, based on past sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13471_c_1.nii.gz | coronary artery wall calcification sequence was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has coronary artery wall calcification changed from past sequences to the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13471_c_1.nii.gz | lymphadenopathy condition history: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about lymphadenopathy based on earlier sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13471_c_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for hiatal hernia: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of hiatal hernia based on previous sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13471_c_1.nii.gz | Before now, cardiomegaly showed [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is cardiomegaly classified now using past sequence data? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13471_c_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for lung nodule: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes lung nodule? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13471_c_1.nii.gz | interlobular septal thickening trend was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does interlobular septal thickening appear now compared to its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13471_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier peribronchial thickening sequences: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has peribronchial thickening evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13471_c_1.nii.gz | pulmonary fibrotic sequela progression: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to pulmonary fibrotic sequela in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13471_c_1.nii.gz | Scans showed pleural effusion as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of pleural effusion? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13471_c_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of mosaic attenuation pattern: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of mosaic attenuation pattern? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13471_c_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for bronchiectasis: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of bronchiectasis based on prior sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13471_c_1.nii.gz | atelectasis had: [0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is atelectasis in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13471_c_1.nii.gz | lung opacity over time: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for lung opacity considering its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13471_c_1.nii.gz | Prior emphysema timeline: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is emphysema now, given its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13593_c_1.nii.gz | coronary artery wall calcification sequence was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is coronary artery wall calcification classified now using past sequence data? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13593_c_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for hiatal hernia: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of hiatal hernia? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13593_c_1.nii.gz | Before now, lymphadenopathy showed [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does lymphadenopathy currently represent, based on past sequences? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13593_c_1.nii.gz | In past, lung nodule was: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is lung nodule classified now using past sequence data? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13593_c_1.nii.gz | Historical arterial wall calcification status: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of arterial wall calcification based on prior sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13593_c_1.nii.gz | Before now, cardiomegaly showed [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does cardiomegaly appear now compared to its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13593_c_1.nii.gz | In past, pericardial effusion was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does pericardial effusion currently represent, based on past sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13593_c_1.nii.gz | Historical atelectasis status: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes atelectasis? | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | Close | C | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13593_c_1.nii.gz | emphysema condition history: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has emphysema changed from past sequences to the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13593_c_1.nii.gz | pulmonary fibrotic sequela had: [0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about pulmonary fibrotic sequela based on earlier sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13593_c_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for pleural effusion: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is pleural effusion now, given its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13593_c_1.nii.gz | mosaic attenuation pattern over time: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is mosaic attenuation pattern in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13593_c_1.nii.gz | peribronchial thickening progression: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes peribronchial thickening? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_13593_c_1.nii.gz | Scans showed consolidation as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for consolidation considering its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.