Task int64 1 6 | Subtask int64 1 18 | VolumeName stringlengths 18 22 | Question stringlengths 18 296 | Answer stringlengths 2 112 | QuestionType stringclasses 2
values | AnswerChoice stringclasses 5
values | Choice A stringclasses 3
values | Choice B stringclasses 3
values | Choice C stringclasses 2
values | Choice D stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 | 1 | train_4512_c_1.nii.gz | mosaic attenuation pattern sequence was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of mosaic attenuation pattern? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4512_c_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for peribronchial thickening: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has peribronchial thickening evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4512_c_1.nii.gz | consolidation condition history: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has consolidation progressed according to its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4528_c_1.nii.gz | Prior lung opacity timeline: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of lung opacity based on prior sequences? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4528_c_1.nii.gz | lung nodule progression: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of lung nodule? | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | Close | C | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4528_c_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for pericardial effusion: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for pericardial effusion considering its sequence history? | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | Close | C | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4528_c_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for coronary artery wall calcification: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has coronary artery wall calcification evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4528_c_1.nii.gz | hiatal hernia over time: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to hiatal hernia in the current CT? | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | Close | C | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4528_c_1.nii.gz | lymphadenopathy condition history: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has lymphadenopathy progressed according to its temporal sequence? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4528_c_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for cardiomegaly: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is cardiomegaly classified now using past sequence data? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4528_c_1.nii.gz | Scans showed mosaic attenuation pattern as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of mosaic attenuation pattern based on previous sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4528_c_1.nii.gz | emphysema over time: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of emphysema? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4528_c_1.nii.gz | pleural effusion progression: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has pleural effusion changed from past sequences to the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4528_c_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of peribronchial thickening: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about peribronchial thickening based on earlier sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4528_c_1.nii.gz | Historical consolidation status: [1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has consolidation evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4528_c_1.nii.gz | Previous interlobular septal thickening states: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is interlobular septal thickening in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4528_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier bronchiectasis sequences: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is bronchiectasis now, given its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4528_c_1.nii.gz | arterial wall calcification sequence was: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of arterial wall calcification? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4528_c_1.nii.gz | Scans showed pulmonary fibrotic sequela as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of pulmonary fibrotic sequela? | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | Close | C | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4528_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed atelectasis as: [1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of atelectasis? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4541_c_1.nii.gz | consolidation trend was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of consolidation? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4541_c_1.nii.gz | hiatal hernia over time: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about hiatal hernia based on earlier sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4541_c_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for coronary artery wall calcification: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of coronary artery wall calcification based on previous sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4541_c_1.nii.gz | Historical interlobular septal thickening status: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has interlobular septal thickening progressed according to its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4541_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed bronchiectasis as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has bronchiectasis evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4541_c_1.nii.gz | Prior cardiomegaly timeline: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of cardiomegaly? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4541_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed atelectasis as: [0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for atelectasis considering its sequence history? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4541_c_1.nii.gz | Historical lung nodule status: [1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to lung nodule in the current CT? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4541_c_1.nii.gz | arterial wall calcification condition history: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is arterial wall calcification classified now using past sequence data? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4541_c_1.nii.gz | Scans showed lung opacity as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is lung opacity in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4541_c_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of pulmonary fibrotic sequela: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes pulmonary fibrotic sequela? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4541_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier pleural effusion sequences: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for pleural effusion considering its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4541_c_1.nii.gz | Previous mosaic attenuation pattern states: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to mosaic attenuation pattern in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4541_c_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for peribronchial thickening: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of peribronchial thickening? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4541_c_1.nii.gz | Prior emphysema timeline: [1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of emphysema? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4541_c_1.nii.gz | lymphadenopathy progression: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is lymphadenopathy now, given its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4541_c_1.nii.gz | pericardial effusion had: [0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has pericardial effusion changed from past sequences to the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4607_c_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of atelectasis: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does atelectasis appear now compared to its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4607_c_1.nii.gz | Scans showed emphysema as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of emphysema based on prior sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4607_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier lung nodule sequences: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of lung nodule based on prior sequences? | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | Close | C | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4607_c_1.nii.gz | Prior cardiomegaly timeline: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to cardiomegaly in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4607_c_1.nii.gz | pericardial effusion had: [0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of pericardial effusion? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4607_c_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for coronary artery wall calcification: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of coronary artery wall calcification? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4607_c_1.nii.gz | hiatal hernia over time: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has hiatal hernia evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4607_c_1.nii.gz | lymphadenopathy progression: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has lymphadenopathy progressed according to its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4607_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier lung opacity sequences: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does lung opacity currently represent, based on past sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4607_c_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for mosaic attenuation pattern: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of mosaic attenuation pattern? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4607_c_1.nii.gz | peribronchial thickening trend was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has peribronchial thickening changed from past sequences to the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4607_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed consolidation as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of consolidation based on previous sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4607_c_1.nii.gz | Historical bronchiectasis status: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about bronchiectasis based on earlier sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4607_c_1.nii.gz | Before now, interlobular septal thickening showed [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is interlobular septal thickening now, given its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4607_c_1.nii.gz | arterial wall calcification condition history: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for arterial wall calcification considering its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4607_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier pulmonary fibrotic sequela sequences: [1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for pulmonary fibrotic sequela considering its sequence history? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4607_c_1.nii.gz | Previous pleural effusion states: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is pleural effusion classified now using past sequence data? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4647_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed pleural effusion as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is pleural effusion in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4647_c_1.nii.gz | pulmonary fibrotic sequela trend was: [1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to pulmonary fibrotic sequela in the current CT? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4647_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier cardiomegaly sequences: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has cardiomegaly changed from past sequences to the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4647_c_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for bronchiectasis: [1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is bronchiectasis classified now using past sequence data? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4647_c_1.nii.gz | consolidation sequence was: [0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does consolidation currently represent, based on past sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4647_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier arterial wall calcification sequences: [1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is arterial wall calcification in the current CT? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4647_c_1.nii.gz | Historical mosaic attenuation pattern status: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes mosaic attenuation pattern? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4647_c_1.nii.gz | Prior lung opacity timeline: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for lung opacity considering its sequence history? | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | Close | C | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4647_c_1.nii.gz | Before now, peribronchial thickening showed [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for peribronchial thickening considering its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4647_c_1.nii.gz | atelectasis trend was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is atelectasis now, given its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4647_c_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for lymphadenopathy: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about lymphadenopathy based on earlier sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4647_c_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for hiatal hernia: [1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for hiatal hernia considering its sequence history? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4647_c_1.nii.gz | Previous coronary artery wall calcification states: [0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes coronary artery wall calcification? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4647_c_1.nii.gz | Previous pericardial effusion states: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of pericardial effusion based on previous sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4647_c_1.nii.gz | In past, lung nodule was: [1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does lung nodule appear now compared to its sequence history? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4647_c_1.nii.gz | Before now, emphysema showed [1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of emphysema based on prior sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4647_c_1.nii.gz | In past, interlobular septal thickening was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to interlobular septal thickening in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4679_c_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of lung opacity: [1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for lung opacity considering its sequence history? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4679_c_1.nii.gz | Scans showed coronary artery wall calcification as: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes coronary artery wall calcification? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4679_c_1.nii.gz | Prior hiatal hernia timeline: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does hiatal hernia appear now compared to its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4679_c_1.nii.gz | In past, lymphadenopathy was: [1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has lymphadenopathy progressed according to its temporal sequence? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4679_c_1.nii.gz | emphysema had: [0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does emphysema currently represent, based on past sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4679_c_1.nii.gz | atelectasis sequence was: [0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of atelectasis based on prior sequences? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4679_c_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for lung nodule: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is lung nodule classified now using past sequence data? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4679_c_1.nii.gz | pulmonary fibrotic sequela over time: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of pulmonary fibrotic sequela? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4679_c_1.nii.gz | cardiomegaly progression: [1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is cardiomegaly in the current CT? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4679_c_1.nii.gz | pleural effusion progression: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has pleural effusion changed from past sequences to the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4679_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier mosaic attenuation pattern sequences: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does mosaic attenuation pattern appear now compared to its sequence history? | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | Close | C | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4679_c_1.nii.gz | Scans showed peribronchial thickening as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of peribronchial thickening based on previous sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4679_c_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for consolidation: [0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does consolidation appear now compared to its sequence history? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4679_c_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of bronchiectasis: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about bronchiectasis based on earlier sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4679_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier interlobular septal thickening sequences: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is interlobular septal thickening now, given its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4679_c_1.nii.gz | arterial wall calcification over time: [1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is arterial wall calcification now, given its temporal sequence? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4679_c_1.nii.gz | pericardial effusion condition history: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of pericardial effusion based on prior sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4699_c_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for lung opacity: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is lung opacity classified now using past sequence data? | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | Close | C | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4699_c_1.nii.gz | arterial wall calcification condition history: [1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does arterial wall calcification currently represent, based on past sequences? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4699_c_1.nii.gz | Previous cardiomegaly states: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is cardiomegaly in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4699_c_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for pericardial effusion: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes pericardial effusion? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4699_c_1.nii.gz | coronary artery wall calcification trend was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for coronary artery wall calcification considering its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4699_c_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed hiatal hernia as: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to hiatal hernia in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4699_c_1.nii.gz | Previous lymphadenopathy states: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does lymphadenopathy currently represent, based on past sequences? | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | Close | C | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4699_c_1.nii.gz | Historical emphysema status: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of emphysema? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4699_c_1.nii.gz | Before now, pulmonary fibrotic sequela showed [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of pulmonary fibrotic sequela? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4699_c_1.nii.gz | In past, pleural effusion was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has pleural effusion evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4699_c_1.nii.gz | mosaic attenuation pattern sequence was: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has mosaic attenuation pattern progressed according to its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 1 | train_4699_c_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for peribronchial thickening: [0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of peribronchial thickening based on prior sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.