Task int64 1 6 | Subtask int64 1 18 | VolumeName stringlengths 18 22 | Question stringlengths 18 296 | Answer stringlengths 2 112 | QuestionType stringclasses 2
values | AnswerChoice stringclasses 5
values | Choice A stringclasses 3
values | Choice B stringclasses 3
values | Choice C stringclasses 2
values | Choice D stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 | 4 | train_13251_f_1.nii.gz | pulmonary fibrotic sequela progression: [0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has pulmonary fibrotic sequela changed from past sequences to the current CT? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_13368_f_1.nii.gz | Prior pericardial effusion timeline: [0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is pericardial effusion now, given its temporal sequence? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_13368_f_1.nii.gz | cardiomegaly condition history: [0, 1, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about cardiomegaly based on earlier sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_13368_f_1.nii.gz | coronary artery wall calcification had: [1, 1, 0, 1, 1] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is coronary artery wall calcification in the current CT? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_13368_f_1.nii.gz | emphysema sequence was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of emphysema? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_13368_f_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of pulmonary fibrotic sequela: [0, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of pulmonary fibrotic sequela? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_13368_f_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for hiatal hernia: [1, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes hiatal hernia? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_13368_f_1.nii.gz | Scans showed atelectasis as: [0, 0, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is atelectasis now, given its temporal sequence? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_13368_f_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for arterial wall calcification: [0, 1, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of arterial wall calcification based on previous sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_13368_f_1.nii.gz | Earlier consolidation sequences: [0, 0, 0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has consolidation evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_13368_f_1.nii.gz | peribronchial thickening condition history: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has peribronchial thickening evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_13368_f_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of pleural effusion: [0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is pleural effusion in the current CT? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_13368_f_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for mosaic attenuation pattern: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of mosaic attenuation pattern? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_13368_f_1.nii.gz | Scans showed lung opacity as: [1, 0, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of lung opacity? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_13368_f_1.nii.gz | lymphadenopathy over time: [1, 1, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for lymphadenopathy considering its sequence history? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_13368_f_1.nii.gz | Prior bronchiectasis timeline: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has bronchiectasis progressed according to its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_13368_f_1.nii.gz | interlobular septal thickening had: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of interlobular septal thickening based on prior sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_13368_f_1.nii.gz | lung nodule progression: [1, 0, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to lung nodule in the current CT? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14309_f_1.nii.gz | Scans showed arterial wall calcification as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for arterial wall calcification considering its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14309_f_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of cardiomegaly: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to cardiomegaly in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14309_f_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for pericardial effusion: [0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does pericardial effusion currently represent, based on past sequences? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14309_f_1.nii.gz | Earlier coronary artery wall calcification sequences: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of coronary artery wall calcification? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14309_f_1.nii.gz | Before now, hiatal hernia showed [1, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of hiatal hernia based on prior sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14309_f_1.nii.gz | In past, lymphadenopathy was: [0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does lymphadenopathy appear now compared to its sequence history? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14309_f_1.nii.gz | emphysema sequence was: [1, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does emphysema currently represent, based on past sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14309_f_1.nii.gz | Previous atelectasis states: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to atelectasis in the current CT? | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | Close | C | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14309_f_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for lung nodule: [1, 0, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is lung nodule classified now using past sequence data? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14309_f_1.nii.gz | Previous lung opacity states: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of lung opacity? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14309_f_1.nii.gz | pleural effusion over time: [0, 1, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is pleural effusion classified now using past sequence data? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14309_f_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for mosaic attenuation pattern: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has mosaic attenuation pattern evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14309_f_1.nii.gz | peribronchial thickening trend was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has peribronchial thickening progressed according to its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14309_f_1.nii.gz | consolidation progression: [0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of consolidation? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14309_f_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed bronchiectasis as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of bronchiectasis based on prior sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14309_f_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for interlobular septal thickening: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of interlobular septal thickening? | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | Close | C | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14309_f_1.nii.gz | pulmonary fibrotic sequela condition history: [1, 0, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of pulmonary fibrotic sequela? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14360_f_1.nii.gz | In past, cardiomegaly was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has cardiomegaly evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14360_f_1.nii.gz | pericardial effusion sequence was: [0, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has pericardial effusion progressed according to its temporal sequence? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14360_f_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for coronary artery wall calcification: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of coronary artery wall calcification based on prior sequences? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14360_f_1.nii.gz | hiatal hernia progression: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of hiatal hernia? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14360_f_1.nii.gz | Scans showed lymphadenopathy as: [0, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for lymphadenopathy considering its sequence history? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14360_f_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of emphysema: [0, 0, 0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to emphysema in the current CT? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14360_f_1.nii.gz | atelectasis condition history: [1, 1, 1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does atelectasis appear now compared to its sequence history? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14360_f_1.nii.gz | Prior lung opacity timeline: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does lung opacity currently represent, based on past sequences? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14360_f_1.nii.gz | Before now, arterial wall calcification showed [1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of arterial wall calcification? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14360_f_1.nii.gz | Previous pulmonary fibrotic sequela states: [0, 0, 0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of pulmonary fibrotic sequela? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14360_f_1.nii.gz | pleural effusion had: [0, 1, 1, 1, 1] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is pleural effusion classified now using past sequence data? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14360_f_1.nii.gz | Scans showed mosaic attenuation pattern as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of mosaic attenuation pattern? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14360_f_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for peribronchial thickening: [0, 1, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has peribronchial thickening evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14360_f_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for consolidation: [1, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of consolidation? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14360_f_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of bronchiectasis: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has bronchiectasis evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14360_f_1.nii.gz | Earlier interlobular septal thickening sequences: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has interlobular septal thickening progressed according to its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14360_f_1.nii.gz | Earlier lung nodule sequences: [0, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of lung nodule? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14388_f_1.nii.gz | arterial wall calcification over time: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of arterial wall calcification? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14388_f_1.nii.gz | cardiomegaly progression: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of cardiomegaly? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14388_f_1.nii.gz | Scans showed pericardial effusion as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has pericardial effusion evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14388_f_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of coronary artery wall calcification: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has coronary artery wall calcification progressed according to its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14388_f_1.nii.gz | Historical lymphadenopathy status: [1, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does lymphadenopathy appear now compared to its sequence history? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14388_f_1.nii.gz | Earlier emphysema sequences: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of emphysema based on prior sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14388_f_1.nii.gz | Previous atelectasis states: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does atelectasis appear now compared to its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14388_f_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of lung opacity: [0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is lung opacity now, given its temporal sequence? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14388_f_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed hiatal hernia as: [0, 0, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of hiatal hernia based on prior sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14388_f_1.nii.gz | pleural effusion condition history: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has pleural effusion changed from past sequences to the current CT? | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | Close | C | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14388_f_1.nii.gz | mosaic attenuation pattern trend was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is mosaic attenuation pattern classified now using past sequence data? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14388_f_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for pulmonary fibrotic sequela: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does pulmonary fibrotic sequela currently represent, based on past sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14388_f_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed peribronchial thickening as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of peribronchial thickening? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14388_f_1.nii.gz | Historical consolidation status: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has consolidation changed from past sequences to the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14388_f_1.nii.gz | Before now, bronchiectasis showed [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of bronchiectasis based on previous sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14388_f_1.nii.gz | Before now, interlobular septal thickening showed [0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does interlobular septal thickening currently represent, based on past sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14388_f_1.nii.gz | Scans showed lung nodule as: [1, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about lung nodule based on earlier sequences? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14764_f_1.nii.gz | emphysema had: [1, 0, 1, 1, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes emphysema? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14764_f_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for lung nodule: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for lung nodule considering its sequence history? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14764_f_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for arterial wall calcification: [0, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about arterial wall calcification based on earlier sequences? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14764_f_1.nii.gz | cardiomegaly sequence was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has cardiomegaly progressed according to its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14764_f_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for pericardial effusion: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of pericardial effusion based on prior sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14764_f_1.nii.gz | coronary artery wall calcification condition history: [0, 1, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is coronary artery wall calcification now, given its temporal sequence? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14764_f_1.nii.gz | Prior hiatal hernia timeline: [0, 1, 1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is hiatal hernia in the current CT? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14764_f_1.nii.gz | Scans showed lymphadenopathy as: [0, 0, 0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does lymphadenopathy appear now compared to its sequence history? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14764_f_1.nii.gz | atelectasis condition history: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does atelectasis appear now compared to its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14764_f_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of pulmonary fibrotic sequela: [1, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does pulmonary fibrotic sequela currently represent, based on past sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14764_f_1.nii.gz | pleural effusion had: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is pleural effusion classified now using past sequence data? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14764_f_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for mosaic attenuation pattern: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of mosaic attenuation pattern? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14764_f_1.nii.gz | consolidation progression: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of consolidation based on previous sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14764_f_1.nii.gz | Earlier bronchiectasis sequences: [1, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is bronchiectasis classified now using past sequence data? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14764_f_1.nii.gz | Scans showed interlobular septal thickening as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about interlobular septal thickening based on earlier sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14764_f_1.nii.gz | peribronchial thickening over time: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has peribronchial thickening changed from past sequences to the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_14764_f_1.nii.gz | Prior lung opacity timeline: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does lung opacity currently represent, based on past sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_15688_f_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed lymphadenopathy as: [1, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is lymphadenopathy classified now using past sequence data? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_15688_f_1.nii.gz | emphysema progression: [1, 1, 1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for emphysema considering its sequence history? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_15688_f_1.nii.gz | Previous interlobular septal thickening states: [0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has interlobular septal thickening evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_15688_f_1.nii.gz | Historical lung nodule status: [0, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of lung nodule? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_15688_f_1.nii.gz | Previous arterial wall calcification states: [0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of arterial wall calcification based on prior sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_15688_f_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for cardiomegaly: [0, 1, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does cardiomegaly appear now compared to its sequence history? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_15688_f_1.nii.gz | coronary artery wall calcification trend was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does coronary artery wall calcification currently represent, based on past sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_15688_f_1.nii.gz | Previous hiatal hernia states: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of hiatal hernia? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_15688_f_1.nii.gz | Scans showed atelectasis as: [0, 1, 0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to atelectasis in the current CT? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_15688_f_1.nii.gz | Before now, pulmonary fibrotic sequela showed [1, 0, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has pulmonary fibrotic sequela changed from past sequences to the current CT? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_15688_f_1.nii.gz | In past, pleural effusion was: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of pleural effusion based on previous sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_15688_f_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for mosaic attenuation pattern: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of mosaic attenuation pattern? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_15688_f_1.nii.gz | Earlier pericardial effusion sequences: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to pericardial effusion in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_15688_f_1.nii.gz | peribronchial thickening sequence was: [1, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about peribronchial thickening based on earlier sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.