Task int64 1 6 | Subtask int64 1 18 | VolumeName stringlengths 18 22 | Question stringlengths 18 296 | Answer stringlengths 2 112 | QuestionType stringclasses 2
values | AnswerChoice stringclasses 5
values | Choice A stringclasses 3
values | Choice B stringclasses 3
values | Choice C stringclasses 2
values | Choice D stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 | 4 | train_8380_f_1.nii.gz | Prior pericardial effusion timeline: [0, 1, 1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does pericardial effusion currently represent, based on past sequences? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8380_f_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for mosaic attenuation pattern: [0, 1, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does mosaic attenuation pattern currently represent, based on past sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8380_f_1.nii.gz | atelectasis over time: [0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has atelectasis changed from past sequences to the current CT? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8380_f_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for emphysema: [0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of emphysema? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8380_f_1.nii.gz | peribronchial thickening over time: [1, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is peribronchial thickening classified now using past sequence data? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8380_f_1.nii.gz | lung nodule progression: [0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of lung nodule based on previous sequences? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8380_f_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of pleural effusion: [0, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is pleural effusion now, given its temporal sequence? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8380_f_1.nii.gz | Earlier interlobular septal thickening sequences: [0, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is interlobular septal thickening in the current CT? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8380_f_1.nii.gz | Prior consolidation timeline: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has consolidation changed from past sequences to the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8380_f_1.nii.gz | bronchiectasis progression: [1, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of bronchiectasis? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8380_f_1.nii.gz | lung opacity had: [1, 0, 0, 1, 1] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does lung opacity appear now compared to its sequence history? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8380_f_1.nii.gz | Scans showed pulmonary fibrotic sequela as: [1, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about pulmonary fibrotic sequela based on earlier sequences? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8380_f_1.nii.gz | coronary artery wall calcification had: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is coronary artery wall calcification classified now using past sequence data? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8420_f_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for emphysema: [0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is emphysema in the current CT? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8420_f_1.nii.gz | bronchiectasis trend was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does bronchiectasis appear now compared to its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8420_f_1.nii.gz | atelectasis sequence was: [0, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of atelectasis based on prior sequences? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8420_f_1.nii.gz | Scans showed arterial wall calcification as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of arterial wall calcification? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8420_f_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of coronary artery wall calcification: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of coronary artery wall calcification? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8420_f_1.nii.gz | Earlier hiatal hernia sequences: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has hiatal hernia evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8420_f_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed interlobular septal thickening as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does interlobular septal thickening currently represent, based on past sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8420_f_1.nii.gz | pleural effusion condition history: [1, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does pleural effusion currently represent, based on past sequences? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8420_f_1.nii.gz | Earlier cardiomegaly sequences: [1, 1, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about cardiomegaly based on earlier sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8420_f_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for lung nodule: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does lung nodule appear now compared to its sequence history? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8420_f_1.nii.gz | lung opacity trend was: [1, 1, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes lung opacity? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8420_f_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed pulmonary fibrotic sequela as: [0, 0, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for pulmonary fibrotic sequela considering its sequence history? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8420_f_1.nii.gz | Previous mosaic attenuation pattern states: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has mosaic attenuation pattern progressed according to its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8420_f_1.nii.gz | Historical peribronchial thickening status: [0, 0, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to peribronchial thickening in the current CT? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8420_f_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for consolidation: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of consolidation based on prior sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8420_f_1.nii.gz | Previous lymphadenopathy states: [1, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is lymphadenopathy now, given its temporal sequence? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_8420_f_1.nii.gz | In past, pericardial effusion was: [0, 0, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has pericardial effusion progressed according to its temporal sequence? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_9742_f_1.nii.gz | In past, lung nodule was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of lung nodule? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_9742_f_1.nii.gz | Before now, interlobular septal thickening showed [0, 0, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has interlobular septal thickening evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_9742_f_1.nii.gz | bronchiectasis condition history: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about bronchiectasis based on earlier sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_9742_f_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for peribronchial thickening: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of peribronchial thickening based on previous sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_9742_f_1.nii.gz | mosaic attenuation pattern sequence was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has mosaic attenuation pattern changed from past sequences to the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_9742_f_1.nii.gz | pulmonary fibrotic sequela trend was: [0, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does pulmonary fibrotic sequela currently represent, based on past sequences? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_9742_f_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for lung opacity: [1, 0, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does lung opacity appear now compared to its sequence history? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_9742_f_1.nii.gz | Previous hiatal hernia states: [0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes hiatal hernia? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_9742_f_1.nii.gz | atelectasis trend was: [0, 0, 1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to atelectasis in the current CT? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_9742_f_1.nii.gz | Before now, emphysema showed [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is emphysema classified now using past sequence data? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_9742_f_1.nii.gz | Previous coronary artery wall calcification states: [0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of coronary artery wall calcification based on prior sequences? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_9742_f_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed cardiomegaly as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does cardiomegaly appear now compared to its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_9742_f_1.nii.gz | Historical pericardial effusion status: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does pericardial effusion currently represent, based on past sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_9742_f_1.nii.gz | Earlier arterial wall calcification sequences: [0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is arterial wall calcification in the current CT? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_9742_f_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for lymphadenopathy: [0, 1, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for lymphadenopathy considering its sequence history? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_9742_f_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed pleural effusion as: [1, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of pleural effusion? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 4 | train_9742_f_1.nii.gz | Historical consolidation status: [1, 1, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of consolidation? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_10321_g_1.nii.gz | arterial wall calcification condition history: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes arterial wall calcification? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_10321_g_1.nii.gz | hiatal hernia over time: [1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of hiatal hernia? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_10321_g_1.nii.gz | Prior cardiomegaly timeline: [0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for cardiomegaly considering its sequence history? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_10321_g_1.nii.gz | lung nodule sequence was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to lung nodule in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_10321_g_1.nii.gz | pericardial effusion had: [0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to pericardial effusion in the current CT? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_10321_g_1.nii.gz | In past, lymphadenopathy was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for lymphadenopathy considering its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_10321_g_1.nii.gz | emphysema progression: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has emphysema evolved from earlier scan sequences to now? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_10321_g_1.nii.gz | atelectasis condition history: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of atelectasis based on prior sequences? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_10321_g_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for coronary artery wall calcification: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of coronary artery wall calcification? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_10321_g_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for interlobular septal thickening: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is interlobular septal thickening classified now using past sequence data? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_10321_g_1.nii.gz | pulmonary fibrotic sequela had: [0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does pulmonary fibrotic sequela currently represent, based on past sequences? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_10321_g_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for pleural effusion: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of pleural effusion? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_10321_g_1.nii.gz | Scans showed peribronchial thickening as: [0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has peribronchial thickening progressed according to its temporal sequence? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_10321_g_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of consolidation: [0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of consolidation based on prior sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_10321_g_1.nii.gz | Earlier bronchiectasis sequences: [0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does bronchiectasis appear now compared to its sequence history? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_10321_g_1.nii.gz | Prior lung opacity timeline: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does lung opacity appear now compared to its sequence history? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_10321_g_1.nii.gz | mosaic attenuation pattern condition history: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of mosaic attenuation pattern? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_12537_g_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for pleural effusion: [0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is pleural effusion in the current CT? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_12537_g_1.nii.gz | Prior coronary artery wall calcification timeline: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is coronary artery wall calcification now, given its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_12537_g_1.nii.gz | Before now, pulmonary fibrotic sequela showed [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is pulmonary fibrotic sequela in the current CT? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_12537_g_1.nii.gz | In past, interlobular septal thickening was: [0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes interlobular septal thickening? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_12537_g_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for arterial wall calcification: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of arterial wall calcification based on previous sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_12537_g_1.nii.gz | Scans showed peribronchial thickening as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of peribronchial thickening? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_12537_g_1.nii.gz | mosaic attenuation pattern progression: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to mosaic attenuation pattern in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_12537_g_1.nii.gz | lung opacity had: [0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is lung opacity now, given its temporal sequence? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_12537_g_1.nii.gz | cardiomegaly condition history: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about cardiomegaly based on earlier sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_12537_g_1.nii.gz | Historical atelectasis status: [0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is atelectasis now, given its temporal sequence? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_12537_g_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed lymphadenopathy as: [0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about lymphadenopathy based on earlier sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_12537_g_1.nii.gz | hiatal hernia had: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is hiatal hernia in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_12537_g_1.nii.gz | pericardial effusion trend was: [1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of pericardial effusion based on previous sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_12537_g_1.nii.gz | Past sequences of bronchiectasis: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of bronchiectasis? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_12537_g_1.nii.gz | lung nodule over time: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for lung nodule considering its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_12537_g_1.nii.gz | Sequence history for emphysema: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes emphysema? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_12537_g_1.nii.gz | consolidation over time: [0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes consolidation? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_1348_g_1.nii.gz | lung opacity sequence was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about lung opacity based on earlier sequences? | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | Close | C | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_1348_g_1.nii.gz | In past, lung nodule was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes lung nodule? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_1348_g_1.nii.gz | interlobular septal thickening condition history: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of interlobular septal thickening? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_1348_g_1.nii.gz | Earlier consolidation sequences: [0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of consolidation? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_1348_g_1.nii.gz | Prior peribronchial thickening timeline: [1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of peribronchial thickening? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_1348_g_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for mosaic attenuation pattern: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to mosaic attenuation pattern in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_1348_g_1.nii.gz | pulmonary fibrotic sequela condition history: [0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is pulmonary fibrotic sequela classified now using past sequence data? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_1348_g_1.nii.gz | Historical emphysema status: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is emphysema now, given its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_1348_g_1.nii.gz | Before now, atelectasis showed [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is atelectasis in the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_1348_g_1.nii.gz | Earlier CTs showed hiatal hernia as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about hiatal hernia based on earlier sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_1348_g_1.nii.gz | coronary artery wall calcification trend was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of coronary artery wall calcification based on previous sequences? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_1348_g_1.nii.gz | Old sequences for pericardial effusion: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has pericardial effusion changed from past sequences to the current CT? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_1348_g_1.nii.gz | pleural effusion sequence was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for pleural effusion considering its sequence history? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_1348_g_1.nii.gz | Previous cardiomegaly states: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of cardiomegaly? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_1348_g_1.nii.gz | Previous bronchiectasis states: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of bronchiectasis? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_1348_g_1.nii.gz | Earlier arterial wall calcification sequences: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is arterial wall calcification classified now using past sequence data? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_1348_g_1.nii.gz | Recorded sequences for lymphadenopathy: [0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does lymphadenopathy currently represent, based on past sequences? | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | Close | B | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_1384_g_1.nii.gz | bronchiectasis over time: [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes bronchiectasis? | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Close | A | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
6 | 5 | train_1384_g_1.nii.gz | peribronchial thickening condition history: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has peribronchial thickening progressed according to its temporal sequence? | No Abnormality (Always absent) | Close | D | Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present) | Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent) | New Lesion (Absent previously, now present) | No Abnormality (Always absent) |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.