Tauben's picture
Upload 255 files
2c93ae3 verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
4.55 kB
# Field-dependent high-harmonic generation in a periodic crystal
## Background
An intense mid-infrared field can drive electrons through several bands of a
crystal. The resulting high-harmonic spectrum contains information about both
intraband motion and interband excitation and recombination. A central question
is whether changes in the spectrum as the field grows can be explained by
electron-hole trajectories in crystal momentum space.
Consider a one-dimensional independent-electron crystal in atomic units, with
$$
V(x)=-V_0\left[1+\cos\left(\frac{2\pi x}{a}\right)\right],
\qquad V_0=0.37,\quad a=8.
$$
The two valence bands are initially filled throughout the first Brillouin zone.
Use an independent-electron TDSE in the velocity gauge for this periodic
crystal, with $E(t)=-\partial_t A(t)$. The spatial or basis representation is
your choice, provided it converges to the same Hamiltonian and initial state.
Use a linearly polarized pulse of wavelength $\lambda=3200$ nm and total
support $T_p=99.66$ fs,
$$
E(t)=E_0\sin^4\left(\frac{\pi t}{T_p}\right)
\sin\left[\omega\left(t-\frac{T_p}{2}\right)\right],
\qquad 0\leq t\leq T_p,
$$
and $E(t)=0$ outside this interval, where $\omega=2\pi c/\lambda$. The stated
$T_p$ is the entire nonzero support of the pulse.
## Research problem
Determine how the high-harmonic response of this crystal changes with the peak
field amplitude $E_0$, and establish whether a momentum-space trajectory model
can account for the material spectral regimes, their limiting photon energies,
and the timing of the emission.
Establish the conclusion from your own auditable calculation of the stated
model, and distinguish what the evidence demonstrates from what remains
model-dependent. The derivation, computational route, evidence architecture,
controls, field domain, and organization of the report are for you to decide.
No particular number or layout of outputs is prescribed.
Spatial and crystal-momentum representations, propagation algorithms, grids,
time steps, transforms, time-frequency windows, spectral estimators, cutoff
definitions, tolerances, and display ranges are student choices. State the
choices that affect your claims and provide evidence sufficiently reliable and
reconstructible to support them. Declare normalization and display scaling;
absolute spectral intensity is not a grading target.
Do not add electron-electron interaction, dephasing, disorder, propagation
through a macroscopic sample, or phenomenological band modifications to the
required production calculation. Clearly separated exploratory extensions are
permitted, but they cannot replace the stated model.
## Submission
Submit one self-contained scientific report and an offline reproduction
package containing the derivation, code, numerical data underlying all
material claims, a provenance note listing every offline source or software document actually consulted and the method basis for items supplied from general knowledge, and concise run and environment
information. No fixed file tree, filename scheme, panel count, or complete
exploration history is required.
Resource limits are supplied exclusively by the accompanying
`resource_limits.json`. Its fixed CPU allocation, candidate-active
wall time, network boundary and temporary-storage allowance are binding.
No separate aggregate CPU-hour limit applies.
## Reference and integrity policy
This examination is conducted without network access or live literature
retrieval. You may rely on your existing general scientific knowledge and, if any are
explicitly supplied with the examination, on those offline materials or
software documentation. Record every such source actually consulted. For formulas,
methods, constants, or conventions used from general knowledge rather than a
consulted source, state enough of the method basis, definition, value, units,
and convention to make the calculation auditable; do not invent a citation.
You are not required to identify or prove a publication date or to retrieve
literature during the examination.
The hidden target article and its identifying metadata, figures or captions,
supplementary material, author code or data, target-specific reproduction
code, solution or scoring material, online solutions, and worked
reproductions of this case must not be used. All submitted scientific figures
and numerical data must be generated by your own implementation of the stated
problem.
See [submission requirements](../../submission_requirements.md) for the common submission entry points.