|
Download cases/case28/task.md from Tauben/PhysClosureBench: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 4.55 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/Tauben/PhysClosureBench/resolve/main/cases/case28/task.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/Tauben/PhysClosureBench/cases/case28/task.md
-
curl -L -o task.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/Tauben/PhysClosureBench/resolve/main/cases/case28/task.md
4.55 kB
| # Field-dependent high-harmonic generation in a periodic crystal | |
| ## Background | |
| An intense mid-infrared field can drive electrons through several bands of a | |
| crystal. The resulting high-harmonic spectrum contains information about both | |
| intraband motion and interband excitation and recombination. A central question | |
| is whether changes in the spectrum as the field grows can be explained by | |
| electron-hole trajectories in crystal momentum space. | |
| Consider a one-dimensional independent-electron crystal in atomic units, with | |
| $$ | |
| V(x)=-V_0\left[1+\cos\left(\frac{2\pi x}{a}\right)\right], | |
| \qquad V_0=0.37,\quad a=8. | |
| $$ | |
| The two valence bands are initially filled throughout the first Brillouin zone. | |
| Use an independent-electron TDSE in the velocity gauge for this periodic | |
| crystal, with $E(t)=-\partial_t A(t)$. The spatial or basis representation is | |
| your choice, provided it converges to the same Hamiltonian and initial state. | |
| Use a linearly polarized pulse of wavelength $\lambda=3200$ nm and total | |
| support $T_p=99.66$ fs, | |
| $$ | |
| E(t)=E_0\sin^4\left(\frac{\pi t}{T_p}\right) | |
| \sin\left[\omega\left(t-\frac{T_p}{2}\right)\right], | |
| \qquad 0\leq t\leq T_p, | |
| $$ | |
| and $E(t)=0$ outside this interval, where $\omega=2\pi c/\lambda$. The stated | |
| $T_p$ is the entire nonzero support of the pulse. | |
| ## Research problem | |
| Determine how the high-harmonic response of this crystal changes with the peak | |
| field amplitude $E_0$, and establish whether a momentum-space trajectory model | |
| can account for the material spectral regimes, their limiting photon energies, | |
| and the timing of the emission. | |
| Establish the conclusion from your own auditable calculation of the stated | |
| model, and distinguish what the evidence demonstrates from what remains | |
| model-dependent. The derivation, computational route, evidence architecture, | |
| controls, field domain, and organization of the report are for you to decide. | |
| No particular number or layout of outputs is prescribed. | |
| Spatial and crystal-momentum representations, propagation algorithms, grids, | |
| time steps, transforms, time-frequency windows, spectral estimators, cutoff | |
| definitions, tolerances, and display ranges are student choices. State the | |
| choices that affect your claims and provide evidence sufficiently reliable and | |
| reconstructible to support them. Declare normalization and display scaling; | |
| absolute spectral intensity is not a grading target. | |
| Do not add electron-electron interaction, dephasing, disorder, propagation | |
| through a macroscopic sample, or phenomenological band modifications to the | |
| required production calculation. Clearly separated exploratory extensions are | |
| permitted, but they cannot replace the stated model. | |
| ## Submission | |
| Submit one self-contained scientific report and an offline reproduction | |
| package containing the derivation, code, numerical data underlying all | |
| material claims, a provenance note listing every offline source or software document actually consulted and the method basis for items supplied from general knowledge, and concise run and environment | |
| information. No fixed file tree, filename scheme, panel count, or complete | |
| exploration history is required. | |
| Resource limits are supplied exclusively by the accompanying | |
| `resource_limits.json`. Its fixed CPU allocation, candidate-active | |
| wall time, network boundary and temporary-storage allowance are binding. | |
| No separate aggregate CPU-hour limit applies. | |
| ## Reference and integrity policy | |
| This examination is conducted without network access or live literature | |
| retrieval. You may rely on your existing general scientific knowledge and, if any are | |
| explicitly supplied with the examination, on those offline materials or | |
| software documentation. Record every such source actually consulted. For formulas, | |
| methods, constants, or conventions used from general knowledge rather than a | |
| consulted source, state enough of the method basis, definition, value, units, | |
| and convention to make the calculation auditable; do not invent a citation. | |
| You are not required to identify or prove a publication date or to retrieve | |
| literature during the examination. | |
| The hidden target article and its identifying metadata, figures or captions, | |
| supplementary material, author code or data, target-specific reproduction | |
| code, solution or scoring material, online solutions, and worked | |
| reproductions of this case must not be used. All submitted scientific figures | |
| and numerical data must be generated by your own implementation of the stated | |
| problem. | |
| See [submission requirements](../../submission_requirements.md) for the common submission entry points. | |