|
Download cases/case39/task.md from Tauben/PhysClosureBench: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 4.51 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/Tauben/PhysClosureBench/resolve/main/cases/case39/task.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/Tauben/PhysClosureBench/cases/case39/task.md
-
curl -L -o task.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/Tauben/PhysClosureBench/resolve/main/cases/case39/task.md
4.51 kB
| # Atomic high-harmonic generation in a quantized optical cavity | |
| ## Physical setting | |
| Work in atomic units. Consider one electron moving along coordinate $z$ in the | |
| soft-Coulomb potential | |
| $$ | |
| V(z)=-\frac{1}{|z|+\eta},\qquad \eta=0.9871. | |
| $$ | |
| The nucleus is fixed at $z=0$. A single cavity mode of frequency $\omega_c$ is | |
| represented by displacement coordinate $x_c$. In the length gauge, use the | |
| two-coordinate Hamiltonian | |
| $$ | |
| \begin{aligned} | |
| H(t)={}&-\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial z^2} | |
| -\frac{1}{|z|+\eta} | |
| -\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x_c^2} | |
| +\frac{\omega_c^2x_c^2}{2}\\ | |
| &-\sqrt{2\omega_c}\,g_czx_c | |
| +\frac{g_c^2}{\omega_c}z^2+zF(t). | |
| \end{aligned} | |
| $$ | |
| The last term drives only the electron. The bilinear interaction and the | |
| dipole self-energy are both part of the physical model. Use | |
| $$ | |
| F(t)=F_0\cos[\omega_0(t-T/2)] | |
| \cos^2\!\left[\frac{\pi(t-T/2)}{T}\right], | |
| \qquad 0\le t\le T, | |
| $$ | |
| with $F(t)=0$ outside the pulse and | |
| $$ | |
| F_0=0.09,\qquad \omega_0=0.05,\qquad | |
| T=\frac{20\pi}{\omega_0}. | |
| $$ | |
| Compare the uncoupled reference, $g_c=0$, with the three cavity cases | |
| $$ | |
| (\omega_c,g_c)=(0.05,0.01),\quad(0.10,0.01),\quad(0.3185,0.06). | |
| $$ | |
| For each coupled case, start from the field-free polaritonic ground state and | |
| treat the dynamics by direct propagation of the two-coordinate | |
| time-dependent Schrödinger equation. The propagated state must retain physical | |
| norm loss rather than being renormalized at every step. Any conditional | |
| coordinate or energy expectation values must use a declared, consistent norm | |
| convention, while the emitted response must retain ionization loss. | |
| ## Research problem | |
| Determine whether and how the selected cavity configurations change the | |
| high-harmonic response and its high-energy extent relative to the uncoupled | |
| atom. Establish whether the coupled dynamics of the electronic and cavity | |
| degrees of freedom provide a physically consistent explanation of the | |
| spectral differences. | |
| Your conclusion must distinguish effects supported by the computed cases from | |
| broader claims that the evidence does not establish. Limit all conclusions to | |
| the specified one-dimensional, single-electron, single-mode model. | |
| The derivation, spatial representation, boundary treatment, initial-state | |
| solver, propagator, time step, spectral transform, high-order or endpoint | |
| estimator, evidence design, validation strategy, normalization display, | |
| plotting choices, and report organization are for you to choose and justify. | |
| No particular number, sequence, range, grid, window, solver, or layout of | |
| figures is prescribed. | |
| ## Submission and resources | |
| Submit one self-contained scientific report and an auditable offline | |
| calculation package containing the task-specific derivation, code, numerical | |
| data underlying every material claim, a provenance note listing every offline source or software document actually consulted and the method basis for items supplied from general knowledge, and concise | |
| run and environment information. No fixed file tree, filename scheme, panel | |
| count, or complete exploration history is required. | |
| Resource limits are supplied exclusively by the accompanying | |
| `resource_limits.json`. Its fixed CPU allocation, candidate-active | |
| wall time, network boundary are binding. No separate aggregate CPU-hour limit applies. Greater computational expense | |
| receives no additional credit. | |
| ## Reference and integrity policy | |
| This examination is conducted without network access or live literature | |
| retrieval. You may rely on your existing general scientific knowledge and, if any are | |
| explicitly supplied with the examination, on those offline materials or | |
| software documentation. Record every such source actually consulted. For formulas, | |
| methods, constants, or conventions used from general knowledge rather than a | |
| consulted source, state enough of the method basis, definition, value, units, | |
| and convention to make the calculation auditable; do not invent a citation. | |
| You are not required to identify or prove a publication date or to retrieve | |
| literature during the examination. | |
| The hidden target article and its identifying metadata, figures or captions, | |
| supplementary material, author code or data, target-specific reproduction | |
| code, solution or scoring material, online solutions, and worked | |
| reproductions of this case must not be used. All submitted scientific figures | |
| and numerical data must be generated by your own implementation of the stated | |
| problem. | |
| See [submission requirements](../../submission_requirements.md) for the common submission entry points. | |