user_study_result / README.md
Thang203's picture
Update study dataset (5 files)
a4cb257 verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
2.17 kB
metadata
license: cc-by-4.0
tags:
  - human-study
  - web-agents
  - grounding
  - hci

PageGuide user study — results

One row per answered task from the PageGuide web study, on the task selection the analysis dashboard uses by default. rows.csv is the row-level data; the two behavior_*.csv files are the aggregates plotted in the behavioural figures (mean, sd, se and n per cell). outcomes.csv carries accuracy, localization F1 and its two halves, and the timing stages — mean, sd, se, median and quartiles per cell.

Exported 2026-08-14T05:06:12.478Z · 217 rows · 43 participants.

Conditions

Every participant sees both arms, interleaved task by task:

  • nongrounding — the agent reports an answer with no evidence attached.
  • grounding — the same claims, with citations into the page and saved image crops.

Task selection

Some tasks are excluded from their card by default. The figures and these files use the same selection, so they agree with the dashboard:

Facet Left out Why
Find × Text MARS-v1 a disputed answer key
Find × Visual MUFC-V1, PEDANT-V1 two runs whose grounded locate time is ~14× the others while accuracy and localization stay flat
Guide × Text gv2-ed05a7b6-kk24zp, gv2-ms9iw0pq-5kj5zr, gv2-msf02a2n-88li4p, gv2-msf5mo9m-qm5brt three duplicate re-recordings, plus both recordings of the New York goal
Guide × Visual gv2-msf1pyqv-omt0hz a run whose ground truth blames one step under two error types, so no participant can score it in full

What is not here

Participants' free-text notes are omitted, and session ids are replaced with a per-export participant integer. Both are deliberate: the notes are the only column that can carry something about a person rather than about a task.

Scoring

Localization quality is F1. For Find it is over the passages picked; for Guide it is the mean of an F1 over the error types named and an F1 over the steps blamed, with a correct "no error" scoring in full on a run that contains none. A null precision means the participant predicted nothing, which is zero true positives, so its F1 is 0 rather than missing.