Split (3)

train · 11.1k rows

id stringlengths 10 14	entries listlengths 2 2
CONVFINQA8322	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhuman capital management strategic imperative entergy engaged in a strategic imperative intended to optimize the organization through a process known as human capital management . in july 2013 management completed a comprehensive review of entergy 2019s organization design and processes . this effort resulted in a new internal organization structure , which resulted in the elimination of approximately 800 employee positions . entergy incurred approximately $ 110 million in costs in 2013 associated with this phase of human capital management , primarily implementation costs , severance expenses , pension curtailment losses , special termination benefits expense , and corporate property , plant , and equipment impairments . in december 2013 , entergy deferred for future recovery approximately $ 45 million of these costs , as approved by the apsc and the lpsc . see note 2 to the financial statements for details of the deferrals and note 13 to the financial statements for details of the restructuring charges . liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy 2019s capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy 2019s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>debt to capital</td><td>57.9% ( 57.9 % )</td><td>58.7% ( 58.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of excluding securitization bonds</td><td>( 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) )</td><td>( 1.8% ( 1.8 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt to capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )</td><td>56.3% ( 56.3 % )</td><td>56.9% ( 56.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>effect of subtracting cash</td><td>( 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) )</td><td>( 1.1% ( 1.1 % ) )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net debt to net capital excluding securitization bonds ( a )</td><td>54.8% ( 54.8 % )</td><td>55.8% ( 55.8 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) calculation excludes the arkansas , louisiana , and texas securitization bonds , which are non-recourse to entergy arkansas , entergy louisiana , and entergy texas , respectively . net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents . debt consists of notes payable and commercial paper , capital lease obligations , and long-term debt , including the currently maturing portion . capital consists of debt , common shareholders 2019 equity , and subsidiaries 2019 preferred stock without sinking fund . net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents . entergy uses the debt to capital ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating entergy 2019s financial condition because the securitization bonds are non-recourse to entergy , as more fully described in note 5 to the financial statements . entergy also uses the net debt to net capital ratio excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes it provides useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating entergy 2019s financial condition because net debt indicates entergy 2019s outstanding debt position that could not be readily satisfied by cash and cash equivalents on hand . long-term debt , including the currently maturing portion , makes up most of entergy 2019s total debt outstanding . following are entergy 2019s long-term debt principal maturities and estimated interest payments as of december 31 , 2013 . to estimate future interest payments for variable rate debt , entergy used the rate as of december 31 , 2013 . the amounts below include payments on the entergy louisiana and system energy sale-leaseback transactions , which are included in long-term debt on the balance sheet . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis .\nQuestion: what was the debt-to-capital ratio in 2013?\nAnswer: 57.9\nQuestion: and what was it in 2012?\nAnswer: 58.7\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.8" } ]
CONVFINQA5316	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndetermined that it will primarily be subject to the ietu in future periods , and as such it has recorded tax expense of approximately $ 20 million in 2007 for the deferred tax effects of the new ietu system . as of december 31 , 2007 , the company had us federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $ 206 million which will begin to expire in 2023 . of this amount , $ 47 million relates to the pre-acquisition period and is subject to limitation . the remaining $ 159 million is subject to limitation as a result of the change in stock ownership in may 2006 . this limitation is not expected to have a material impact on utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards . the company also had foreign net operating loss carryforwards as of december 31 , 2007 of approximately $ 564 million for canada , germany , mexico and other foreign jurisdictions with various expiration dates . net operating losses in canada have various carryforward periods and began expiring in 2007 . net operating losses in germany have no expiration date . net operating losses in mexico have a ten year carryforward period and begin to expire in 2009 . however , these losses are not available for use under the new ietu tax regulations in mexico . as the ietu is the primary system upon which the company will be subject to tax in future periods , no deferred tax asset has been reflected in the balance sheet as of december 31 , 2007 for these income tax loss carryforwards . the company adopted the provisions of fin 48 effective january 1 , 2007 . fin 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax benefit is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements . fin 48 also provides guidance on derecognition , measurement , classification , interest and penalties , accounting in interim periods , disclosure and transition . as a result of the implementation of fin 48 , the company increased retained earnings by $ 14 million and decreased goodwill by $ 2 million . in addition , certain tax liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits , as well as related potential penalties and interest , were reclassified from current liabilities to long-term liabilities . liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 , 2007 relate to various us and foreign jurisdictions . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows : year ended december 31 , 2007 ( in $ millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year ended december 31 2007 ( in $ millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1 2007</td><td>193</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases in tax positions for the current year</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>increases in tax positions for prior years</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>decreases in tax positions of prior years</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance as of december 31 2007</td><td>200</td></tr></table> included in the unrecognized tax benefits of $ 200 million as of december 31 , 2007 is $ 56 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would reduce the company 2019s effective tax rate . the company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes . as of december 31 , 2007 , the company has recorded a liability of approximately $ 36 million for interest and penalties . this amount includes an increase of approximately $ 13 million for the year ended december 31 , 2007 . the company operates in the united states ( including multiple state jurisdictions ) , germany and approximately 40 other foreign jurisdictions including canada , china , france , mexico and singapore . examinations are ongoing in a number of those jurisdictions including , most significantly , in germany for the years 2001 to 2004 . during the quarter ended march 31 , 2007 , the company received final assessments in germany for the prior examination period , 1997 to 2000 . the effective settlement of those examinations resulted in a reduction to goodwill of approximately $ 42 million with a net expected cash outlay of $ 29 million . the company 2019s celanese corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) %%transmsg* transmitting job : y48011 pcn : 122000000 *%%pcmsg\|f-49 \|00023\|yes\|no\|02/26/2008 22:07\|0\|0\|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d\| .\nQuestion: what was the account balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of 12/31/07?\nAnswer: 2000.0\nQuestion: and as of 1/1/07?\nAnswer: 193.0\nQuestion: so what was the difference in the balance between these two dates?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1807.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8776	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\napproved by the board of directors on april 21 , 2004 and expired on april 30 , 2006 . sources and uses in financing activities during 2005 related primarily to uses for the payment of a dividend ( $ 54.0 million ) and stock repurchase ( $ 26.7 million ) , and a source of cash from the issuance of common shares related to the exercise of employee stock options , the related tax benefit , and the employee stock purchase plan ( $ 9.7 million ) . cash dividends paid to shareholders were $ 162.5 million , $ 107.9 million , and $ 54.0 million during fiscal years 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively . we believe that our existing cash balances and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet our projected capital expenditures , working capital and other cash requirements at least through the end of fiscal 2010 . contractual obligations and commercial commitments future commitments of garmin , as of december 29 , 2007 , aggregated by type of contractual obligation . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>contractual obligations</td><td>payments due by period total</td><td>payments due by period less than 1 year</td><td>payments due by period 1-3 years</td><td>payments due by period 3-5 years</td><td>payments due by period more than 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating leases</td><td>$ 43438</td><td>$ 6581</td><td>$ 11582</td><td>$ 9263</td><td>$ 16012</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchase obligations</td><td>5078</td><td>422</td><td>2251</td><td>2405</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 48516</td><td>$ 7003</td><td>$ 13833</td><td>$ 11668</td><td>$ 16012</td></tr></table> operating leases describes lease obligations associated with garmin facilities located in the u.s. , taiwan , the u.k. , and canada . purchase obligations are the aggregate of those purchase orders that were outstanding on december 29 , 2007 ; these obligations are created and then paid off within 3 months during the normal course of our manufacturing business . off-balance sheet arrangements we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements . item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk market sensitivity we have market risk primarily in connection with the pricing of our products and services and the purchase of raw materials . product pricing and raw materials costs are both significantly influenced by semiconductor market conditions . historically , during cyclical industry downturns , we have been able to offset pricing declines for our products through a combination of improved product mix and success in obtaining price reductions in raw materials costs . inflation we do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our business , financial condition or results of operations . if our costs were to become subject to significant inflationary pressures , we may not be able to fully offset such higher costs through price increases . our inability or failure to do so could adversely affect our business , financial condition and results of operations . foreign currency exchange rate risk the operation of garmin 2019s subsidiaries in international markets results in exposure to movements in currency exchange rates . we generally have not been significantly affected by foreign exchange fluctuations .\nQuestion: what portion of total obligations are related to operating leases?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.89533" } ]
CONVFINQA8718	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>citi</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p financials</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>31-dec-2010</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>30-dec-2011</td><td>55.67</td><td>102.11</td><td>82.94</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>31-dec-2012</td><td>83.81</td><td>118.45</td><td>106.84</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>31-dec-2013</td><td>110.49</td><td>156.82</td><td>144.90</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>31-dec-2014</td><td>114.83</td><td>178.28</td><td>166.93</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>31-dec-2015</td><td>110.14</td><td>180.75</td><td>164.39</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the value of citi in 2013 less the initial $100 investment?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "10.49" } ]
CONVFINQA4589	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations state street corporation \| 90 table 30 : total deposits average balance december 31 years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>december 31 2016</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>client deposits</td><td>$ 180149</td><td>$ 176693</td><td>$ 158996</td><td>$ 156029</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>wholesale cds</td><td>4747</td><td>10470</td><td>4812</td><td>14456</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total deposits</td><td>$ 184896</td><td>$ 187163</td><td>$ 163808</td><td>$ 170485</td></tr></table> short-term funding our on-balance sheet liquid assets are also an integral component of our liquidity management strategy . these assets provide liquidity through maturities of the assets , but more importantly , they provide us with the ability to raise funds by pledging the securities as collateral for borrowings or through outright sales . in addition , our access to the global capital markets gives us the ability to source incremental funding at reasonable rates of interest from wholesale investors . as discussed earlier under 201casset liquidity , 201d state street bank's membership in the fhlb allows for advances of liquidity with varying terms against high-quality collateral . short-term secured funding also comes in the form of securities lent or sold under agreements to repurchase . these transactions are short-term in nature , generally overnight , and are collateralized by high-quality investment securities . these balances were $ 2.84 billion and $ 4.40 billion as of december 31 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively . state street bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of cad 1.40 billion , or approximately $ 1.11 billion as of december 31 , 2017 , to support its canadian securities processing operations . the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice . as of december 31 , 2017 , there was no balance outstanding on this line of credit . long-term funding we have the ability to issue debt and equity securities under our current universal shelf registration to meet current commitments and business needs , including accommodating the transaction and cash management needs of our clients . in addition , state street bank , a wholly owned subsidiary of the parent company , also has authorization to issue up to $ 5 billion in unsecured senior debt and an additional $ 500 million of subordinated debt . agency credit ratings our ability to maintain consistent access to liquidity is fostered by the maintenance of high investment-grade ratings as measured by the major independent credit rating agencies . factors essential to maintaining high credit ratings include : 2022 diverse and stable core earnings ; 2022 relative market position ; 2022 strong risk management ; 2022 strong capital ratios ; 2022 diverse liquidity sources , including the global capital markets and client deposits ; 2022 strong liquidity monitoring procedures ; and 2022 preparedness for current or future regulatory developments . high ratings limit borrowing costs and enhance our liquidity by : 2022 providing assurance for unsecured funding and depositors ; 2022 increasing the potential market for our debt and improving our ability to offer products ; 2022 serving markets ; and 2022 engaging in transactions in which clients value high credit ratings . a downgrade or reduction of our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity by restricting our ability to access the capital markets , which could increase the related cost of funds . in turn , this could cause the sudden and large-scale withdrawal of unsecured deposits by our clients , which could lead to draw-downs of unfunded commitments to extend credit or trigger requirements under securities purchase commitments ; or require additional collateral or force terminations of certain trading derivative contracts . a majority of our derivative contracts have been entered into under bilateral agreements with counterparties who may require us to post collateral or terminate the transactions based on changes in our credit ratings . we assess the impact of these arrangements by determining the collateral that would be required assuming a downgrade by all rating agencies . the additional collateral or termination payments related to our net derivative liabilities under these arrangements that could have been called by counterparties in the event of a downgrade in our credit ratings below levels specified in the agreements is disclosed in note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , of this form 10-k . other funding sources , such as secured financing transactions and other margin requirements , for which there are no explicit triggers , could also be adversely affected. .\nQuestion: what was the value of client deposits at the end of 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "180149.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8803	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nwe measure cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities reduced by expenditures for property additions . we use this non-gaap financial measure of cash flow to focus management and investors on the amount of cash available for debt repayment , dividend distributions , acquisition opportunities , and share repurchases . our cash flow metric is reconciled to the most comparable gaap measure , as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 1758</td><td>$ 1595</td><td>$ 1008</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions to properties</td><td>-533 ( 533 )</td><td>-594 ( 594 )</td><td>-474 ( 474 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash flow</td><td>$ 1225</td><td>$ 1001</td><td>$ 534</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>year-over-year change</td><td>22.4% ( 22.4 % )</td><td>87.5% ( 87.5 % )</td><td>-</td></tr></table> year-over-year change 22.4 % ( % ) 87.5 % ( % ) year-over-year changes in cash flow ( as defined ) were driven by improved performance in working capital resulting from the benefit derived from the pringles acquisition , as well as changes in the level of capital expenditures during the three-year period . investing activities our net cash used in investing activities for 2012 amounted to $ 3245 million , an increase of $ 2658 million compared with 2011 primarily attributable to the $ 2668 acquisition of pringles in capital spending in 2012 included investments in our supply chain infrastructure , and to support capacity requirements in certain markets , including pringles . in addition , we continued the investment in our information technology infrastructure related to the reimplementation and upgrade of our sap platform . net cash used in investing activities of $ 587 million in 2011 increased by $ 122 million compared with 2010 , reflecting capital projects for our reimplementation and upgrade of our sap platform and investments in our supply chain . cash paid for additions to properties as a percentage of net sales has decreased to 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) in 2012 , from 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) in 2011 , which was an increase from 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) in financing activities in february 2013 , we issued $ 250 million of two-year floating-rate u.s . dollar notes , and $ 400 million of ten-year 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) u.s . dollar notes . the proceeds from these notes will be used for general corporate purposes , including , together with cash on hand , repayment of the $ 750 million aggregate principal amount of our 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) u.s . dollar notes due march 2013 . the floating-rate notes bear interest equal to three-month libor plus 23 basis points , subject to quarterly reset . the notes contain customary covenants that limit the ability of kellogg company and its restricted subsidiaries ( as defined ) to incur certain liens or enter into certain sale and lease-back transactions , as well as a change of control provision . our net cash provided by financing activities was $ 1317 for 2012 , compared to net cash used in financing activities of $ 957 and $ 439 for 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the increase in cash provided from financing activities in 2012 compared to 2011 and 2010 , was primarily due to the issuance of debt related to the acquisition of pringles . total debt was $ 7.9 billion at year-end 2012 and $ 6.0 billion at year-end 2011 . in march 2012 , we entered into interest rate swaps on our $ 500 million five-year 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 , $ 500 million ten-year 4.15% ( 4.15 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2019 and $ 500 million of our $ 750 million seven-year 4.45% ( 4.45 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 . the interest rate swaps effectively converted these notes from their fixed rates to floating rate obligations through maturity . in may 2012 , we issued $ 350 million of three-year 1.125% ( 1.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes , $ 400 million of five-year 1.75% ( 1.75 % ) u.s . dollar notes and $ 700 million of ten-year 3.125% ( 3.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes , resulting in aggregate net proceeds after debt discount of $ 1.442 billion . the proceeds of these notes were used for general corporate purposes , including financing a portion of the acquisition of pringles . in may 2012 , we issued cdn . $ 300 million of two-year 2.10% ( 2.10 % ) fixed rate canadian dollar notes , using the proceeds from these notes for general corporate purposes , which included repayment of intercompany debt . this repayment resulted in cash available to be used for a portion of the acquisition of pringles . in december 2012 , we repaid $ 750 million five-year 5.125% ( 5.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes at maturity with commercial paper . in february 2011 , we entered into interest rate swaps on $ 200 million of our $ 750 million seven-year 4.45% ( 4.45 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 . the interest rate swaps effectively converted this portion of the notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in april 2011 , we repaid $ 945 million ten-year 6.60% ( 6.60 % ) u.s . dollar notes at maturity with commercial paper . in may 2011 , we issued $ 400 million of seven-year 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes , using the proceeds of $ 397 million for general corporate purposes and repayment of commercial paper . during 2011 , we entered into interest rate swaps with notional amounts totaling $ 400 million , which effectively converted these notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in november 2011 , we issued $ 500 million of five-year 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) fixed rate u . s . dollar notes , using the proceeds of $ 498 million for general corporate purposes and repayment of commercial paper . during 2012 , we entered into interest rate swaps which effectively converted these notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in april 2010 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing us to repurchase shares of our common stock amounting to $ 2.5 billion during 2010 through 2012 . this three year authorization replaced previous share buyback programs which had authorized stock repurchases of up to $ 1.1 billion for 2010 and $ 650 million for 2009 . under this program , we repurchased approximately 1 million , 15 million and 21 million shares of common stock for $ 63 million , $ 793 million and $ 1.1 billion during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . in december 2012 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing us to repurchase shares of our common stock amounting to $ 300 million during 2013 . we paid quarterly dividends to shareholders totaling $ 1.74 per share in 2012 , $ 1.67 per share in 2011 and $ 1.56 per share in 2010 . total cash paid for dividends increased by 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2012 and 3.4% ( 3.4 % ) in 2011 . in march 2011 , we entered into an unsecured four- year credit agreement which allows us to borrow , on a revolving credit basis , up to $ 2.0 billion . our long-term debt agreements contain customary covenants that limit kellogg company and some of its subsidiaries from incurring certain liens or from entering into certain sale and lease-back transactions . some agreements also contain change in control provisions . however , they do not contain acceleration of maturity clauses that are dependent on credit ratings . a change in our credit ratings could limit our access to the u.s . short-term debt market and/or increase the cost of refinancing long-term debt in the future . however , even under these circumstances , we would continue to have access to our four-year credit agreement , which expires in march 2015 . this source of liquidity is unused and available on an unsecured basis , although we do not currently plan to use it . capital and credit markets , including commercial paper markets , continued to experience instability and disruption as the u.s . and global economies underwent a period of extreme uncertainty . throughout this period of uncertainty , we continued to have access to the u.s. , european , and canadian commercial paper markets . our commercial paper and term debt credit ratings were not affected by the changes in the credit environment . we monitor the financial strength of our third-party financial institutions , including those that hold our cash and cash equivalents as well as those who serve as counterparties to our credit facilities , our derivative financial instruments , and other arrangements . we are in compliance with all covenants as of december 29 , 2012 . we continue to believe that we will be able to meet our interest and principal repayment obligations and maintain our debt covenants for the foreseeable future , while still meeting our operational needs , including the pursuit of selected bolt-on acquisitions . this will be accomplished through our strong cash flow , our short- term borrowings , and our maintenance of credit facilities on a global basis. .\nQuestion: what percentage of net cash from operations is retained as cash flow?\nAnswer: 0.69681\nQuestion: what was the total cash flow for 2011 and 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2226.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2312	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\neastman notes to the audited consolidated financial statements stock option awards option awards are granted to non-employee directors on an annual basis and to employees who meet certain eligibility requirements . a single annual option grant is usually awarded to eligible employees in the fourth quarter of each year , if and when granted by the compensation and management development committee of the board of directors , and occasional individual grants are awarded to eligible employees throughout the year . option awards have an exercise price equal to the closing price of the company's stock on the date of grant . the term of options is ten years with vesting periods that vary up to three years . vesting usually occurs ratably or at the end of the vesting period . sfas no . 123 ( r ) requires that stock option awards be valued at fair value determined by market price , if actively traded in a public market or , if not , calculated using an option pricing financial model . the fair value of the company's options cannot be determined by market value as they are not traded in an open market . accordingly , a financial pricing model is utilized to determine fair value . the company utilizes the black scholes merton ( \"bsm\" ) model which relies on certain assumptions to estimate an option's fair value . the weighted average assumptions used in the determination of fair value for stock options awarded in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 are provided in the table below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>assumptions</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility rate</td><td>21.40% ( 21.40 % )</td><td>22.90% ( 22.90 % )</td><td>28.00% ( 28.00 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>3.24% ( 3.24 % )</td><td>3.29% ( 3.29 % )</td><td>3.80% ( 3.80 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>average risk-free interest rate</td><td>4.62% ( 4.62 % )</td><td>4.48% ( 4.48 % )</td><td>3.46% ( 3.46 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected forfeiture rate</td><td>0.75% ( 0.75 % )</td><td>actual</td><td>actual</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>expected term years</td><td>4.40</td><td>5.00</td><td>6.00</td></tr></table> prior to adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) , the company calculated the expected term of stock options of six years . effective with the fourth quarter 2005 annual option award , the company analyzed historical annual grant transactions over a ten year period comprising exercises , post-vesting cancellations and expirations to determine the expected term . the company expects to execute this analysis each year preceding the annual option grant to ensure that all assumptions based upon internal data reflect the most reasonable expectations for fair value determination . the weighted average expected term of 4.4 years for 2006 reflects the impact of this annual analysis and the weighting of option swap and reload grants which may have much shorter expected terms than new option grants . the volatility rate of grants is derived from historical company common stock volatility over the same time period as the expected term . the company uses a weekly high closing stock price based upon daily closing prices in the week . the volatility rate is derived by mathematical formula utilizing the weekly high closing price data . for the periods presented above , the expected dividend yield is derived by mathematical formula which uses the expected company annual dividend amount over the expected term divided by the fair market value of the company's common stock at the grant date . the average risk-free interest rate is derived from united states department of treasury published interest rates of daily yield curves for the same time period as the expected term . prior to adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) , the company did not estimate forfeitures and recognized them as they occurred for proforma disclosure of share-based compensation expense . with adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) , estimated forfeitures must be considered in recording share-based compensation expense . estimated forfeiture rates vary with each type of award affected by several factors , one of which is the varying composition and characteristics of the award participants . estimated forfeitures for the company's share-based awards historically range from 0.75 percent to 10.0 percent with the estimated forfeitures for options at 0.75 percent. .\nQuestion: what was the expected dividend yield in 2006?\nAnswer: 3.24\nQuestion: what was the expected yield in 2005?\nAnswer: 3.29\nQuestion: what is the net difference?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.05" } ]
CONVFINQA5364	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2022 international . in general , our international markets are less advanced with respect to the current technologies deployed for wireless services . as a result , demand for our communications sites is driven by continued voice network investments , new market entrants and initial 3g data network deployments . for example , in india , nationwide voice networks continue to be deployed as wireless service providers are beginning their initial investments in 3g data networks , as a result of recent spectrum auctions . in mexico and brazil , where nationwide voice networks have been deployed , some incumbent wireless service providers continue to invest in their 3g data networks , and recent spectrum auctions have enabled other incumbent wireless service providers and new market entrants to begin their initial investments in 3g data networks . in markets such as chile and peru , recent spectrum auctions have attracted new market entrants , who are expected to begin their investment in deploying nationwide voice and 3g data networks . we believe demand for our tower sites will continue in our international markets as wireless service providers seek to remain competitive by increasing the coverage of their networks while also investing in next generation data networks . rental and management operations new site revenue growth . during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , we grew our portfolio of communications sites through acquisitions and construction activities , including the acquisition and construction of approximately 7800 sites . we continue to evaluate opportunities to acquire larger communications site portfolios , both domestically and internationally , that we believe we can effectively integrate into our existing portfolio. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new sites ( acquired or constructed )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>domestic</td><td>947</td><td>528</td><td>160</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>international ( 1 )</td><td>6865</td><td>3022</td><td>801</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the majority of sites acquired or constructed internationally during 2010 and 2009 were in india and our newly launched operations in chile , colombia and peru . network development services segment revenue growth . as we continue to focus on growing our rental and management operations , we anticipate that our network development services revenue will continue to represent a small percentage of our total revenues . through our network development services segment , we offer tower-related services , including site acquisition , zoning and permitting services and structural analysis services , which primarily support our site leasing business and the addition of new tenants and equipment on our sites . rental and management operations expenses . our rental and management operations expenses include our direct site level expenses and consist primarily of ground rent , property taxes , repairs and maintenance and utilities . these segment level expenses exclude all segment and corporate level selling , general , administrative and development expenses , which are aggregated into one line item entitled selling , general , administrative and development expense . in general , our rental and management segment level selling , general and administrative expenses do not significantly increase as a result of adding incremental tenants to our legacy sites and typically increase only modestly year-over-year . as a result , leasing additional space to new tenants on our legacy sites provides significant incremental cash flow . in geographic areas where we have recently launched operations or are focused on materially expanding our site footprint , we may incur additional segment level selling , general and administrative expenses as we increase our presence in these areas . our profit margin growth is therefore positively impacted by the addition of new tenants to our legacy sites and can be temporarily diluted by our development activities . reit election . as we review our tax strategy and assess the utilization of our federal and state nols , we are actively considering an election to a reit for u.s . federal and , where applicable , state income tax purposes . we may make the determination to elect reit status for the taxable year beginning january 1 , 2012 , as early as the second half of 2011 , subject to the approval of our board of directors , although there is no certainty as to the timing of a reit election or whether we will make a reit election at all. .\nQuestion: in 2010, what was the total of new sites acquired or constructed?\nAnswer: 7812.0\nQuestion: and what portion of these sites were located in the us?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.12122" } ]
CONVFINQA4110	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income ( loss ) 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 20.2 million primarily due to higher net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 entergy new orleans had net income of $ 7.9 million in 2003 compared to a net loss in 2002 . the increase was due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy new orleans' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 208.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base rates</td><td>10.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>8.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2004 deferrals</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>price applied to unbilled electric sales</td><td>3.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2004 net revenue</td><td>$ 239.0</td></tr></table> the increase in base rates was effective june 2003 . the rate increase is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased billed electric usage of 162 gwh in the industrial service sector . the increase was partially offset by milder weather in the residential and commercial sectors . the 2004 deferrals variance is due to the deferral of voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses in accordance with a stipulation approved by the city council in august 2004 . the stipulation allows for the recovery of these costs through amortization of a regulatory asset . the voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses are being amortized over a five-year period that became effective january 2004 and january 2003 , respectively . the formula rate plan is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the price applied to unbilled electric sales variance is due to an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales. .\nQuestion: what was net revenues at the end of 2004?\nAnswer: 239.0\nQuestion: what were they at the end of 2003?\nAnswer: 208.3\nQuestion: what was the change in revenue?\nAnswer: 30.7\nQuestion: what was the 2003 number?\nAnswer: 208.3\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.14738" } ]
CONVFINQA5773	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nappropriate statistical bases . total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.5 billion for 2015 , $ 2.4 billion for 2014 , and $ 2.3 billion for 2013 . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 13 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions 2015 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>dec . 31 2015</td><td>dec . 31 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>$ 743</td><td>$ 877</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income and other taxes payable</td><td>434</td><td>412</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accrued wages and vacation</td><td>391</td><td>409</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest payable</td><td>208</td><td>178</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accrued casualty costs</td><td>181</td><td>249</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>equipment rents payable</td><td>105</td><td>100</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>dividends payable [a]</td><td>-</td><td>438</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>550</td><td>640</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total accounts payable and other current liabilities</td><td>$ 2612</td><td>$ 3303</td></tr></table> [a] beginning in 2015 , the timing of the dividend declaration and payable dates was aligned to occur within the same quarter . the 2015 dividends paid amount includes the fourth quarter 2014 dividend of $ 438 million , which was paid on january 2 , 2015 , the first quarter 2015 dividend of $ 484 million , which was paid on march 30 , 2015 , the second quarter 2015 dividend of $ 479 million , which was paid on june 30 , 2015 , the third quarter 2015 dividend of $ 476 million , which was paid on september 30 , 2015 , as well as the fourth quarter 2015 dividend of $ 467 million , which was paid on december 30 , 2015 . 14 . financial instruments strategy and risk 2013 we may use derivative financial instruments in limited instances for other than trading purposes to assist in managing our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and fuel prices . we are not a party to leveraged derivatives and , by policy , do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . derivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged , both at inception and throughout the hedged period . we formally document the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items at inception , as well as our risk- management objectives , strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions , and method of assessing hedge effectiveness . changes in the fair market value of derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are charged to earnings . we may use swaps , collars , futures , and/or forward contracts to mitigate the risk of adverse movements in interest rates and fuel prices ; however , the use of these derivative financial instruments may limit future benefits from favorable interest rate and fuel price movements . market and credit risk 2013 we address market risk related to derivative financial instruments by selecting instruments with value fluctuations that highly correlate with the underlying hedged item . we manage credit risk related to derivative financial instruments , which is minimal , by requiring high credit standards for counterparties and periodic settlements . at december 31 , 2015 , and 2014 , we were not required to provide collateral , nor had we received collateral , relating to our hedging activities . interest rate fair value hedges 2013 we manage our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates by adjusting the proportion of fixed and floating rate debt instruments within our debt portfolio over a given period . we generally manage the mix of fixed and floating rate debt through the issuance of targeted amounts of each as debt matures or as we require incremental borrowings . we employ derivatives , primarily swaps , as one of the tools to obtain the targeted mix . in addition , we also obtain flexibility in managing interest costs and the interest rate mix within our debt portfolio by evaluating the issuance of and managing outstanding callable fixed-rate debt securities . swaps allow us to convert debt from fixed rates to variable rates and thereby hedge the risk of changes in the debt 2019s fair value attributable to the changes in interest rates . we account for swaps as fair value hedges using the short-cut method ; therefore , we do not record any ineffectiveness within our .\nQuestion: what was the value of equipment rents payable in 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "105.0" } ]
CONVFINQA709	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nrecourse and repurchase obligations as discussed in note 3 loan sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities , pnc has sold commercial mortgage , residential mortgage and home equity loans directly or indirectly through securitization and loan sale transactions in which we have continuing involvement . one form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets . commercial mortgage loan recourse obligations we originate , close and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to fnma under fnma 2019s delegated underwriting and servicing ( dus ) program . we participated in a similar program with the fhlmc . under these programs , we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement . at december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 , the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $ 11.7 billion and $ 12.8 billion , respectively . the potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $ 3.6 billion at december 31 , 2013 and $ 3.9 billion at december 31 , 2012 . we maintain a reserve for estimated losses based upon our exposure . the reserve for losses under these programs totaled $ 33 million and $ 43 million as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 , respectively , and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet . if payment is required under these programs , we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred , although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses . our exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the corporate & institutional banking segment . table 152 : analysis of commercial mortgage recourse obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 43</td><td>$ 47</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>reserve adjustments net</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses 2013 loan repurchases and settlements</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 33</td><td>$ 43</td></tr></table> residential mortgage loan and home equity repurchase obligations while residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis , we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors . these loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where pnc is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements . for additional information on loan sales see note 3 loan sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities . our historical exposure and activity associated with agency securitization repurchase obligations has primarily been related to transactions with fnma and fhlmc , as indemnification and repurchase losses associated with fha and va-insured and uninsured loans pooled in gnma securitizations historically have been minimal . repurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the residential mortgage banking segment . in the fourth quarter of 2013 , pnc reached agreements with both fnma and fhlmc to resolve their repurchase claims with respect to loans sold between 2000 and 2008 . pnc paid a total of $ 191 million related to these settlements . pnc 2019s repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines of credit that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by national city prior to our acquisition of national city . pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of loans sold in these transactions . repurchase activity associated with brokered home equity loans/lines of credit is reported in the non-strategic assets portfolio segment . indemnification and repurchase liabilities are initially recognized when loans are sold to investors and are subsequently evaluated by management . initial recognition and subsequent adjustments to the indemnification and repurchase liability for the sold residential mortgage portfolio are recognized in residential mortgage revenue on the consolidated income statement . since pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , only subsequent adjustments are recognized to the home equity loans/lines indemnification and repurchase liability . these adjustments are recognized in other noninterest income on the consolidated income statement . 214 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .\nQuestion: what is the potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements in 2012?\nAnswer: 3.6\nQuestion: what about in 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3.9" } ]
CONVFINQA7978	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnbcuniversal media , llc consolidated statement of comprehensive income . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 3624</td><td>$ 3297</td><td>$ 2122</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred gains ( losses ) on cash flow hedges net</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td><td>25</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>employee benefit obligations net</td><td>60</td><td>-106 ( 106 )</td><td>95</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>currency translation adjustments net</td><td>-121 ( 121 )</td><td>-62 ( 62 )</td><td>-41 ( 41 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>comprehensive income</td><td>3542</td><td>3154</td><td>2171</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net ( income ) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests</td><td>-210 ( 210 )</td><td>-182 ( 182 )</td><td>-154 ( 154 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other comprehensive ( income ) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests</td><td>29</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>comprehensive income attributable to nbcuniversal</td><td>$ 3361</td><td>$ 2972</td><td>$ 2017</td></tr></table> see accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements . 147 comcast 2015 annual report on form 10-k .\nQuestion: what was the comprehensive income attributable to nbcuniversal in 2014?\nAnswer: 2972.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2013?\nAnswer: 2017.0\nQuestion: by how much, then, did it change over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "955.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1089	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following table summarizes the changes in the total amounts of unrealized tax benefits for fiscal 2009 through fiscal 2011. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance november 1 2008</td><td>$ 13750</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions for tax positions of 2009</td><td>4411</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>balance october 31 2009</td><td>18161</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of 2010</td><td>286</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance october 30 2010</td><td>$ 18447</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>additions for tax positions related to prior years</td><td>9265</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions for tax positions related to prior years</td><td>-17677 ( 17677 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-370 ( 370 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance october 29 2011</td><td>$ 9665</td></tr></table> fiscal years 2004 and 2005 irs examination during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 , the internal revenue service ( irs ) completed its field examination of the company 2019s fiscal years 2004 and 2005 . on january 2 , 2008 , the irs issued its report for fiscal 2004 and 2005 , which included four proposed adjustments related to these two fiscal years that the company protested to the irs appeals office . two of the unresolved matters were one-time issues that pertain to section 965 of the internal revenue code related to the beneficial tax treatment of dividends paid from foreign owned companies under the american jobs creation act . the other matters pertained to the computation of the research and development ( r&d ) tax credit and certain profits earned from manufacturing activities carried on outside the united states . the company recorded a tax liability for a portion of the proposed r&d tax credit adjustment . these four items had an additional potential tax liability of $ 46 million . the company concluded , based on discussions with its tax advisors , that these items were not likely to result in any additional tax liability . therefore , the company did not record a tax liability for these items . during the second quarter of fiscal 2011 , the company reached settlement with the irs appeals office on three of the four items under protest . the remaining unresolved matter is a one-time issue pertaining to section 965 of the internal revenue code related to the beneficial tax treatment of dividends from foreign owned companies under the american jobs creation act . the company will file a petition with the tax court with respect to this open matter . the potential liability for this adjustment is $ 36.5 million . the company has concluded , based on discussions with its tax advisors , that this item is not likely to result in any additional tax liability . therefore , the company has not recorded any additional tax liability for this issue . fiscal years 2006 and 2007 irs examination during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 , the irs completed its field examination of the company 2019s fiscal years 2006 and 2007 . the irs and the company agreed on the treatment of a number of issues that have been included in an issue resolutions agreement related to the 2006 and 2007 tax returns . however , no agreement was reached on the tax treatment of a number of issues for the fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007 years , including the same r&d tax credit and foreign manufacturing issues mentioned above related to fiscal 2004 and 2005 , the pricing of intercompany sales ( transfer pricing ) and the deductibility of certain stock option compensation expenses . the company recorded taxes related to a portion of the proposed r&d tax credit adjustment . these four items had an additional potential total tax liability of $ 195 million . the company concluded , based on discussions with its tax advisors that these items were not likely to result in any additional tax liability . therefore , the company did not record any additional tax liability for these items and appealed these proposed adjustments through the normal processes for the resolution of differences between the irs and taxpayers . during the second quarter of fiscal 2011 , the company reached an agreement with the irs appeals office on three of the four protested items , two of which were the same issues settled relating to the 2004 and 2005 fiscal years . transfer pricing remained as the only item under protest with the irs appeals office related to the fiscal analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what is the sum of additions for tax positions related to prior years and reductions for tax positions related to prior years?\nAnswer: -8412.0\nQuestion: what is the value of settlements with taxing authorities?\nAnswer: -370.0\nQuestion: what is the total sum?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-8782.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4405	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndecember 18 , 2007 , we issued an additional 23182197 shares of common stock to citadel . the issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to section 4 ( 2 ) of the securities act of 1933 , and each purchaser has represented to us that it is an 201caccredited investor 201d as defined in regulation d promulgated under the securities act of 1933 , and that the common stock was being acquired for investment . we did not engage in a general solicitation or advertising with regard to the issuances of the common stock and have not offered securities to the public in connection with the issuances . see item 1 . business 2014citadel investment . performance graph the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor 2019s ( 201cs&p 201d ) 500 and the s&p super cap diversified financials during the period from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/02</td><td>12/03</td><td>12/04</td><td>12/05</td><td>12/06</td><td>12/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>etrade financial corporation</td><td>100.00</td><td>260.29</td><td>307.61</td><td>429.22</td><td>461.32</td><td>73.05</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p super cap diversified financials</td><td>100.00</td><td>139.29</td><td>156.28</td><td>170.89</td><td>211.13</td><td>176.62</td></tr></table> 2022 $ 100 invested on 12/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 . 2022 copyright a9 2008 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .\nQuestion: what was the change in the price of etrade financial corporation between 12/02 and 12/07?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-26.95" } ]
CONVFINQA3093	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncustomary conditions . we will retain a 20% ( 20 % ) equity interest in the joint venture . as of december 31 , 2008 , the joint venture has acquired seven properties from us and we received year-to-date net sale proceeds and financing distributions of approximately $ 251.6 million . in january 2008 , we sold a tract of land to an unconsolidated joint venture in which we hold a 50% ( 50 % ) equity interest and received a distribution , commensurate to our partner 2019s 50% ( 50 % ) ownership interest , of approximately $ 38.3 million . in november 2008 , that unconsolidated joint venture entered a loan agreement with a consortium of banks and distributed a portion of the loan proceeds to us and our partner , with our share of the distribution totaling $ 20.4 million . uses of liquidity our principal uses of liquidity include the following : 2022 property investment ; 2022 recurring leasing/capital costs ; 2022 dividends and distributions to shareholders and unitholders ; 2022 long-term debt maturities ; 2022 opportunistic repurchases of outstanding debt ; and 2022 other contractual obligations . property investment we evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon market outlook , supply and long-term growth potential . our ability to make future property investments is dependent upon our continued access to our longer-term sources of liquidity including the issuances of debt or equity securities as well as disposing of selected properties . in light of current economic conditions , management continues to evaluate our investment priorities and we are limiting new development expenditures . recurring expenditures one of our principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the recurring leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following is a summary of our recurring capital expenditures for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>recurring tenant improvements</td><td>$ 36885</td><td>$ 45296</td><td>$ 41895</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>recurring leasing costs</td><td>28205</td><td>32238</td><td>32983</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>building improvements</td><td>9724</td><td>8402</td><td>8122</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>totals</td><td>$ 74814</td><td>$ 85936</td><td>$ 83000</td></tr></table> dividends and distributions in order to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes , we must currently distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our taxable income to shareholders . because depreciation is a non-cash expense , cash flow will typically be greater than operating income . we paid dividends per share of $ 1.93 , $ 1.91 and $ 1.89 for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . we expect to continue to distribute taxable earnings to meet the requirements to maintain our reit status . however , distributions are declared at the discretion of our board of directors and are subject to actual cash available for distribution , our financial condition , capital requirements and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant . in january 2009 , our board of directors resolved to decrease our annual dividend from $ 1.94 per share to $ 1.00 per share in order to retain additional cash to help meet our capital needs . we anticipate retaining additional cash of approximately $ 145.2 million per year , when compared to an annual dividend of $ 1.94 per share , as the result of this action . at december 31 , 2008 we had six series of preferred shares outstanding . the annual dividend rates on our preferred shares range between 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) and are paid in arrears quarterly. .\nQuestion: as of 2008, what percentage of the total recurring capital expenditures were associated with leasing costs?\nAnswer: 0.377\nQuestion: and in that same year, what was the dividend per share paid?\nAnswer: 1.93\nQuestion: what was it in 2007?\nAnswer: 1.91\nQuestion: what was, then, the total dividend per share paid in both years combined?\nAnswer: 3.84\nQuestion: including 2006, what then becomes this total?\nAnswer: 5.73\nQuestion: and what was the average dividend per share paid between those three years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.91" } ]
CONVFINQA157	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2010 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company's common stock versus the standard and poor's s&p 500 retail index ( \"s&p 500 retail index\" ) and the standard and poor's s&p 500 index ( \"s&p 500\" ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>december 31 , 2010</td><td>december 31 , 2011</td><td>december 31 , 2012</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>o'reilly automotive inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 148</td><td>$ 213</td><td>$ 319</td><td>$ 419</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 retail index</td><td>100</td><td>103</td><td>128</td><td>185</td><td>203</td><td>252</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 113</td><td>$ 147</td><td>$ 164</td><td>$ 163</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the change in o'reilly automotive from 2010 to 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "32.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin a new business model such as the retail segment is inherently risky , particularly in light of the significant investment involved , the current economic climate , and the fixed nature of a substantial portion of the retail segment's operating expenses . results for this segment are dependent upon a number of risks and uncertainties , some of which are discussed below under the heading \"factors that may affect future results and financial condition.\" backlog in the company's experience , the actual amount of product backlog at any particular time is not a meaningful indication of its future business prospects . in particular , backlog often increases in anticipation of or immediately following new product introductions because of over- ordering by dealers anticipating shortages . backlog often is reduced once dealers and customers believe they can obtain sufficient supply . because of the foregoing , backlog cannot be considered a reliable indicator of the company's ability to achieve any particular level of revenue or financial performance . further information regarding the company's backlog may be found below under the heading \"factors that may affect future results and financial condition.\" gross margin gross margin for the three fiscal years ended september 28 , 2002 are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : gross margin increased to 28% ( 28 % ) of net sales in 2002 from 23% ( 23 % ) in 2001 . as discussed below , gross margin in 2001 was unusually low resulting from negative gross margin of 2% ( 2 % ) experienced in the first quarter of 2001 . as a percentage of net sales , the company's quarterly gross margins declined during fiscal 2002 from 31% ( 31 % ) in the first quarter down to 26% ( 26 % ) in the fourth quarter . this decline resulted from several factors including a rise in component costs as the year progressed and aggressive pricing by the company across its products lines instituted as a result of continued pricing pressures in the personal computer industry . the company anticipates that its gross margin and the gross margin of the overall personal computer industry will remain under pressure throughout fiscal 2003 in light of weak economic conditions , flat demand for personal computers in general , and the resulting pressure on prices . the foregoing statements regarding anticipated gross margin in 2003 and the general demand for personal computers during 2003 are forward- looking . gross margin could differ from anticipated levels because of several factors , including certain of those set forth below in the subsection entitled \"factors that may affect future results and financial condition.\" there can be no assurance that current gross margins will be maintained , targeted gross margin levels will be achieved , or current margins on existing individual products will be maintained . in general , gross margins and margins on individual products will remain under significant downward pressure due to a variety of factors , including continued industry wide global pricing pressures , increased competition , compressed product life cycles , potential increases in the cost and availability of raw material and outside manufacturing services , and potential changes to the company's product mix , including higher unit sales of consumer products with lower average selling prices and lower gross margins . in response to these downward pressures , the company expects it will continue to take pricing actions with respect to its products . gross margins could also be affected by the company's ability to effectively manage quality problems and warranty costs and to stimulate demand for certain of its products . the company's operating strategy and pricing take into account anticipated changes in foreign currency exchange rates over time ; however , the company's results of operations can be significantly affected in the short-term by fluctuations in exchange rates . the company orders components for its products and builds inventory in advance of product shipments . because the company's markets are volatile and subject to rapid technology and price changes , there is a risk the company will forecast incorrectly and produce or order from third parties excess or insufficient inventories of particular products or components . the company's operating results and financial condition have been in the past and may in the future be materially adversely affected by the company's ability to manage its inventory levels and outstanding purchase commitments and to respond to short-term shifts in customer demand patterns . gross margin declined to 23% ( 23 % ) of net sales in 2001 from 27% ( 27 % ) in 2000 . this decline resulted primarily from gross margin of negative 2% ( 2 % ) experienced during the first quarter of 2001 compared to 26% ( 26 % ) gross margin for the same quarter in 2000 . in addition to lower than normal net . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 5742</td><td>$ 5363</td><td>$ 7983</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>4139</td><td>4128</td><td>5817</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross margin</td><td>$ 1603</td><td>$ 1235</td><td>$ 2166</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross margin percentage</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td><td>23% ( 23 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the total of net sales in 2001?\nAnswer: 5363.0\nQuestion: and what was that in 2000?\nAnswer: 7983.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change in the total of net sales over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-2620.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7122	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) becton , dickinson and company ( b ) these reclassifications were recorded to interest expense and cost of products sold . additional details regarding the company's cash flow hedges are provided in note 13 . on august 25 , 2016 , in anticipation of proceeds to be received from the divestiture of the respiratory solutions business in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 , the company entered into an accelerated share repurchase ( \"asr\" ) agreement . subsequent to the end of the company's fiscal year 2016 and as per the terms of the asr agreement , the company received approximately 1.3 million shares of its common stock , which was recorded as a $ 220 million increase to common stock in treasury . note 4 2014 earnings per share the weighted average common shares used in the computations of basic and diluted earnings per share ( shares in thousands ) for the years ended september 30 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>average common shares outstanding</td><td>212702</td><td>202537</td><td>193299</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dilutive share equivalents from share-based plans</td><td>4834</td><td>4972</td><td>4410</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>average common and common equivalent shares outstanding 2014 assuming dilution</td><td>217536</td><td>207509</td><td>197709</td></tr></table> average common and common equivalent shares outstanding 2014 assuming dilution 217536 207509 197709 upon closing the acquisition of carefusion corporation ( 201ccarefusion 201d ) on march 17 , 2015 , the company issued approximately 15.9 million of its common shares as part of the purchase consideration . additional disclosures regarding this acquisition are provided in note 9 . options to purchase shares of common stock are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share when their inclusion would have an anti-dilutive effect on the calculation . for the years ended september 30 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 there were no options to purchase shares of common stock which were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation. .\nQuestion: what are the number of outstanding shares in 2016?\nAnswer: 212702.0\nQuestion: what are the number of shares in 2015?\nAnswer: 202537.0\nQuestion: what is the sum?\nAnswer: 415239.0\nQuestion: what is the total sum including shares from 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "608538.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2569	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe changes in the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the year ended december 29 , 2007 are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of december 31 2006</td><td>$ 337226</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross amount of the decreases in unrecognized tax benefits of tax positions taken during a prior year</td><td>-31608 ( 31608 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross amount of the increases in unrecognized tax benefits as a result of tax positions taken during the current year</td><td>7764</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>amount of decreases in unrecognized tax benefits relating to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-6001 ( 6001 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reductions to unrecognized tax benefits resulting from the lapse of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-511 ( 511 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance as of december 29 2007</td><td>$ 306870</td></tr></table> as of december 29 , 2007 , $ 228.4 million of unrecognized tax benefits would , if recognized , reduce the effective tax rate , as compared to $ 232.1 million as of december 31 , 2006 , the first day of cadence 2019s fiscal year . the total amounts of interest and penalties recognized in the consolidated income statement for the year ended december 29 , 2007 resulted in net tax benefits of $ 11.1 million and $ 0.4 million , respectively , primarily due to the effective settlement of tax audits during the year . the total amounts of gross accrued interest and penalties recognized in the consolidated balance sheets as of december 29 , 2007 , were $ 47.9 million and $ 9.7 million , respectively as compared to $ 65.8 million and $ 10.1 million , respectively as of december 31 , 2006 . note 9 . acquisitions for each of the acquisitions described below , the results of operations and the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed have been included in cadence 2019s consolidated financial statements from the date of the acquisition . comparative pro forma financial information for all 2007 , 2006 and 2005 acquisitions have not been presented because the results of operations were not material to cadence 2019s consolidated financial statements . 2007 acquisitions during 2007 , cadence acquired invarium , inc. , a san jose-based developer of advanced lithography-modeling and pattern-synthesis technology , and clear shape technologies , inc. , a san jose-based design for manufacturing technology company specializing in design-side solutions to minimize yield loss for advanced semiconductor integrated circuits . cadence acquired these two companies for an aggregate purchase price of $ 75.5 million , which included the payment of cash , the fair value of assumed options and acquisition costs . the $ 45.7 million of goodwill recorded in connection with these acquisitions is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes . prior to acquiring clear shape technologies , inc. , cadence had an investment of $ 2.0 million in the company , representing a 12% ( 12 % ) ownership interest , which had been accounted for under the cost method of accounting . in accordance with sfas no . 141 , 201cbusiness combinations , 201d cadence accounted for this acquisition as a step acquisition . subsequent adjustments to the purchase price of these acquired companies are included in the 201cother 201d line of the changes of goodwill table in note 10 below . 2006 acquisition in march 2006 , cadence acquired a company for an aggregate initial purchase price of $ 25.8 million , which included the payment of cash , the fair value of assumed options and acquisition costs . the preliminary allocation of the purchase price was recorded as $ 17.4 million of goodwill , $ 9.4 million of identifiable intangible assets and $ ( 1.0 ) million of net liabilities . the $ 17.4 million of goodwill recorded in connection with this acquisition is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes . subsequent adjustments to the purchase price of this acquired company are included in the 201cother 201d line of the changes of goodwill table in note 10 below. .\nQuestion: what was the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefit in 2007?\nAnswer: 306870.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2006?\nAnswer: 337226.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-30356.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7873	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 128 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hedges of lending-related commitments ( a )</td><td>$ -279 ( 279 )</td><td>$ -3258 ( 3258 )</td><td>$ 2216</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cva and hedges of cva ( a )</td><td>-403 ( 403 )</td><td>1920</td><td>-2359 ( 2359 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gains/ ( losses )</td><td>$ -682 ( 682 )</td><td>$ -1338 ( 1338 )</td><td>$ -143 ( 143 )</td></tr></table> ( a ) these hedges do not qualify for hedge accounting under u.s . gaap . lending-related commitments jpmorgan chase uses lending-related financial instruments , such as commitments and guarantees , to meet the financing needs of its customers . the contractual amount of these financial instruments represents the maximum possible credit risk should the counterpar- ties draw down on these commitments or the firm fulfills its obliga- tion under these guarantees , and should the counterparties subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of these con- tracts . wholesale lending-related commitments were $ 346.1 billion at december 31 , 2010 , compared with $ 347.2 billion at december 31 , 2009 . the decrease reflected the january 1 , 2010 , adoption of accounting guidance related to vies . excluding the effect of the accounting guidance , lending-related commitments would have increased by $ 16.6 billion . in the firm 2019s view , the total contractual amount of these wholesale lending-related commitments is not representative of the firm 2019s actual credit risk exposure or funding requirements . in determining the amount of credit risk exposure the firm has to wholesale lend- ing-related commitments , which is used as the basis for allocating credit risk capital to these commitments , the firm has established a 201cloan-equivalent 201d amount for each commitment ; this amount represents the portion of the unused commitment or other contin- gent exposure that is expected , based on average portfolio histori- cal experience , to become drawn upon in an event of a default by an obligor . the loan-equivalent amounts of the firm 2019s lending- related commitments were $ 189.9 billion and $ 179.8 billion as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . country exposure the firm 2019s wholesale portfolio includes country risk exposures to both developed and emerging markets . the firm seeks to diversify its country exposures , including its credit-related lending , trading and investment activities , whether cross-border or locally funded . country exposure under the firm 2019s internal risk management ap- proach is reported based on the country where the assets of the obligor , counterparty or guarantor are located . exposure amounts , including resale agreements , are adjusted for collateral and for credit enhancements ( e.g. , guarantees and letters of credit ) pro- vided by third parties ; outstandings supported by a guarantor located outside the country or backed by collateral held outside the country are assigned to the country of the enhancement provider . in addition , the effect of credit derivative hedges and other short credit or equity trading positions are taken into consideration . total exposure measures include activity with both government and private-sector entities in a country . the firm also reports country exposure for regulatory purposes following ffiec guidelines , which are different from the firm 2019s internal risk management approach for measuring country expo- sure . for additional information on the ffiec exposures , see cross- border outstandings on page 314 of this annual report . several european countries , including greece , portugal , spain , italy and ireland , have been subject to credit deterioration due to weak- nesses in their economic and fiscal situations . the firm is closely monitoring its exposures to these five countries . aggregate net exposures to these five countries as measured under the firm 2019s internal approach was less than $ 15.0 billion at december 31 , 2010 , with no country representing a majority of the exposure . sovereign exposure in all five countries represented less than half the aggregate net exposure . the firm currently believes its exposure to these five countries is modest relative to the firm 2019s overall risk expo- sures and is manageable given the size and types of exposures to each of the countries and the diversification of the aggregate expo- sure . the firm continues to conduct business and support client activity in these countries and , therefore , the firm 2019s aggregate net exposures may vary over time . in addition , the net exposures may be impacted by changes in market conditions , and the effects of interest rates and credit spreads on market valuations . as part of its ongoing country risk management process , the firm monitors exposure to emerging market countries , and utilizes country stress tests to measure and manage the risk of extreme loss associated with a sovereign crisis . there is no common definition of emerging markets , but the firm generally includes in its definition those countries whose sovereign debt ratings are equivalent to 201ca+ 201d or lower . the table below presents the firm 2019s exposure to its top 10 emerging markets countries based on its internal measure- ment approach . the selection of countries is based solely on the firm 2019s largest total exposures by country and does not represent its view of any actual or potentially adverse credit conditions. .\nQuestion: what was the total of wholesale lending-related commitments in 2010, in billions?\nAnswer: 346.1\nQuestion: and what was it in 2009, also in billions?\nAnswer: 347.2\nQuestion: what was, then, the change in the total of wholesale lending-related commitments over the year?\nAnswer: -1.1\nQuestion: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2009 total?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.00317" } ]
CONVFINQA7360	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at september 29 2007</td><td>$ 7315</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>increases based on positions related to prior years</td><td>351</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases based on positions related to current year</td><td>813</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>decreases relating to lapses of applicable statutes of limitations</td><td>-605 ( 605 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at october 3 2008</td><td>$ 7874</td></tr></table> the company 2019s major tax jurisdictions as of october 3 , 2008 for fin 48 are the u.s. , california , and iowa . for the u.s. , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 1998 due to the carryforward of tax attributes . for california , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2002 due to the carryforward of tax attributes . for iowa , the company has open tax years dating back to fiscal year 2002 due to the carryforward of tax attributes . during the year ended october 3 , 2008 , the statute of limitations period expired relating to an unrecognized tax benefit . the expiration of the statute of limitations period resulted in the recognition of $ 0.6 million of previously unrecognized tax benefit , which impacted the effective tax rate , and $ 0.5 million of accrued interest related to this tax position was reversed during the year . including this reversal , total year-to-date accrued interest related to the company 2019s unrecognized tax benefits was a benefit of $ 0.4 million . 10 . stockholders 2019 equity common stock the company is authorized to issue ( 1 ) 525000000 shares of common stock , par value $ 0.25 per share , and ( 2 ) 25000000 shares of preferred stock , without par value . holders of the company 2019s common stock are entitled to such dividends as may be declared by the company 2019s board of directors out of funds legally available for such purpose . dividends may not be paid on common stock unless all accrued dividends on preferred stock , if any , have been paid or declared and set aside . in the event of the company 2019s liquidation , dissolution or winding up , the holders of common stock will be entitled to share pro rata in the assets remaining after payment to creditors and after payment of the liquidation preference plus any unpaid dividends to holders of any outstanding preferred stock . each holder of the company 2019s common stock is entitled to one vote for each such share outstanding in the holder 2019s name . no holder of common stock is entitled to cumulate votes in voting for directors . the company 2019s second amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that , unless otherwise determined by the company 2019s board of directors , no holder of common stock has any preemptive right to purchase or subscribe for any stock of any class which the company may issue or sell . in march 2007 , the company repurchased approximately 4.3 million of its common shares for $ 30.1 million as authorized by the company 2019s board of directors . the company has no publicly disclosed stock repurchase plans . at october 3 , 2008 , the company had 170322804 shares of common stock issued and 165591830 shares outstanding . preferred stock the company 2019s second amended and restated certificate of incorporation permits the company to issue up to 25000000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series and with rights and preferences that may be fixed or designated by the company 2019s board of directors without any further action by the company 2019s stockholders . the designation , powers , preferences , rights and qualifications , limitations and restrictions of the preferred stock of each skyworks solutions , inc . 2008 annual report %%transmsg* transmitting job : a51732 pcn : 099000000 *%%pcmsg\|103 \|00005\|yes\|no\|03/26/2009 13:34\|0\|0\|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d\| .\nQuestion: in march 2007, what was the total amount spent in the repurchase of common shares?\nAnswer: 30.1\nQuestion: and what was the number of shares bought?\nAnswer: 4.3\nQuestion: what was, then, the average price of those shares?\nAnswer: 7.0\nQuestion: and in the subsequent year, what was the full number of shares of common stock that were authorized to be issued?\nAnswer: 525000000.0\nQuestion: what was the individual price of each of those shares?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.25" } ]
CONVFINQA4906	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nunited parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations liquidity and capital resources operating activities the following is a summary of the significant sources ( uses ) of cash from operating activities ( amounts in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 807</td><td>$ 3804</td><td>$ 3338</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-cash operating activities ( a )</td><td>7301</td><td>4505</td><td>4398</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans )</td><td>-917 ( 917 )</td><td>-1436 ( 1436 )</td><td>-3240 ( 3240 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>income tax receivables and payables</td><td>280</td><td>236</td><td>-319 ( 319 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>changes in working capital and other noncurrent assets and liabilities</td><td>-148 ( 148 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-340 ( 340 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other operating activities</td><td>-107 ( 107 )</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net cash from operating activities</td><td>$ 7216</td><td>$ 7073</td><td>$ 3835</td></tr></table> ( a ) represents depreciation and amortization , gains and losses on derivative and foreign exchange transactions , deferred income taxes , provisions for uncollectible accounts , pension and postretirement benefit expense , stock compensation expense , impairment charges and other non-cash items . cash from operating activities remained strong throughout the 2010 to 2012 time period . operating cash flow was favorably impacted in 2012 , compared with 2011 , by lower contributions into our defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans ; however , this was partially offset by changes in our working capital position , which was impacted by overall growth in the business . the change in the cash flows for income tax receivables and payables in 2011 and 2010 was primarily related to the timing of discretionary pension contributions during 2010 , as discussed further in the following paragraph . except for discretionary or accelerated fundings of our plans , contributions to our company-sponsored pension plans have largely varied based on whether any minimum funding requirements are present for individual pension plans . 2022 in 2012 , we made a $ 355 million required contribution to the ups ibt pension plan . 2022 in 2011 , we made a $ 1.2 billion contribution to the ups ibt pension plan , which satisfied our 2011 contribution requirements and also approximately $ 440 million in contributions that would not have been required until after 2011 . 2022 in 2010 , we made $ 2.0 billion in discretionary contributions to our ups retirement and ups pension plans , and $ 980 million in required contributions to our ups ibt pension plan . 2022 the remaining contributions in the 2010 through 2012 period were largely due to contributions to our international pension plans and u.s . postretirement medical benefit plans . as discussed further in the 201ccontractual commitments 201d section , we have minimum funding requirements in the next several years , primarily related to the ups ibt pension , ups retirement and ups pension plans . as of december 31 , 2012 , the total of our worldwide holdings of cash and cash equivalents was $ 7.327 billion . approximately $ 4.211 billion of this amount was held in european subsidiaries with the intended purpose of completing the acquisition of tnt express n.v . ( see note 16 to the consolidated financial statements ) . excluding this portion of cash held outside the u.s . for acquisition-related purposes , approximately 50%-60% ( 50%-60 % ) of the remaining cash and cash equivalents are held by foreign subsidiaries throughout the year . the amount of cash held by our u.s . and foreign subsidiaries fluctuates throughout the year due to a variety of factors , including the timing of cash receipts and disbursements in the normal course of business . cash provided by operating activities in the united states continues to be our primary source of funds to finance domestic operating needs , capital expenditures , share repurchases and dividend payments to shareowners . to the extent that such amounts represent previously untaxed earnings , the cash held by foreign subsidiaries would be subject to tax if such amounts were repatriated in the form of dividends ; however , not all international cash balances would have to be repatriated in the form of a dividend if returned to the u.s . when amounts earned by foreign subsidiaries are expected to be indefinitely reinvested , no accrual for taxes is provided. .\nQuestion: what was the net income in 2012?\nAnswer: 807.0\nQuestion: and what was it in the previous year?\nAnswer: 3804.0\nQuestion: by how much, then, did it change throughout the period?\nAnswer: -2997.0\nQuestion: and what is this change as a percentage of the 2011 net income?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.78785" } ]
CONVFINQA258	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) detail with respect to our investment portfolio as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 is provided in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 of this form 10-k . loans and leases averaged $ 15.91 billion for the year ended 2014 , up from $ 13.78 billion in 2013 . the increase was mainly related to mutual fund lending and our continued investment in senior secured bank loans . mutual fund lending and senior secured bank loans averaged approximately $ 9.12 billion and $ 1.40 billion , respectively , for the year ended december 31 , 2014 compared to $ 8.16 billion and $ 170 million for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , respectively . average loans and leases also include short- duration advances . table 13 : u.s . and non-u.s . short-duration advances years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>average u.s . short-duration advances</td><td>$ 2355</td><td>$ 2356</td><td>$ 1972</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average non-u.s . short-duration advances</td><td>1512</td><td>1393</td><td>1393</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>average total short-duration advances</td><td>$ 3867</td><td>$ 3749</td><td>$ 3365</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average short-durance advances to average loans and leases</td><td>24% ( 24 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td></tr></table> average u.s . short-duration advances $ 2355 $ 2356 $ 1972 average non-u.s . short-duration advances 1512 1393 1393 average total short-duration advances $ 3867 $ 3749 $ 3365 average short-durance advances to average loans and leases 24% ( 24 % ) 27% ( 27 % ) 29% ( 29 % ) the decline in proportion of the average daily short-duration advances to average loans and leases is primarily due to growth in the other segments of the loan and lease portfolio . short-duration advances provide liquidity to clients in support of their investment activities . although average short-duration advances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 increased compared to the year ended december 31 , 2013 , such average advances remained low relative to historical levels , mainly the result of clients continuing to hold higher levels of liquidity . average other interest-earning assets increased to $ 15.94 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 11.16 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 . the increased levels were primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral provided in connection with our enhanced custody business . aggregate average interest-bearing deposits increased to $ 130.30 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 109.25 billion for year ended 2013 . the higher levels were primarily the result of increases in both u.s . and non-u.s . transaction accounts and time deposits . future transaction account levels will be influenced by the underlying asset servicing business , as well as market conditions , including the general levels of u.s . and non-u.s . interest rates . average other short-term borrowings increased to $ 4.18 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 3.79 billion for the year ended 2013 . the increase was the result of a higher level of client demand for our commercial paper . the decline in rates paid from 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) in 2013 to 0.1% ( 0.1 % ) in 2014 resulted from a reclassification of certain derivative contracts that hedge our interest-rate risk on certain assets and liabilities , which reduced interest revenue and interest expense . average long-term debt increased to $ 9.31 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 8.42 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 . the increase primarily reflected the issuance of $ 1.5 billion of senior and subordinated debt in may 2013 , $ 1.0 billion of senior debt issued in november 2013 , and $ 1.0 billion of senior debt issued in december 2014 . this is partially offset by the maturities of $ 500 million of senior debt in may 2014 and $ 250 million of senior debt in march 2014 . average other interest-bearing liabilities increased to $ 7.35 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 6.46 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral received from clients in connection with our enhanced custody business . several factors could affect future levels of our net interest revenue and margin , including the mix of client liabilities ; actions of various central banks ; changes in u.s . and non-u.s . interest rates ; changes in the various yield curves around the world ; revised or proposed regulatory capital or liquidity standards , or interpretations of those standards ; the amount of discount accretion generated by the former conduit securities that remain in our investment securities portfolio ; and the yields earned on securities purchased compared to the yields earned on securities sold or matured . based on market conditions and other factors , we continue to reinvest the majority of the proceeds from pay-downs and maturities of investment securities in highly-rated securities , such as u.s . treasury and agency securities , municipal securities , federal agency mortgage-backed securities and u.s . and non-u.s . mortgage- and asset-backed securities . the pace at which we continue to reinvest and the types of investment securities purchased will depend on the impact of market conditions and other factors over time . we expect these factors and the levels of global interest rates to influence what effect our reinvestment program will have on future levels of our net interest revenue and net interest margin. .\nQuestion: what was the value of average short term advances in 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3867.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8874	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in 2008 , asp was flat compared to 2007 . by comparison , asp decreased approximately 9% ( 9 % ) in 2007 and decreased approximately 11% ( 11 % ) in 2006 . the segment has several large customers located throughout the world . in 2008 , aggregate net sales to the segment 2019s five largest customers accounted for approximately 41% ( 41 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . besides selling directly to carriers and operators , the segment also sells products through a variety of third-party distributors and retailers , which accounted for approximately 24% ( 24 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales in 2008 . although the u.s . market continued to be the segment 2019s largest individual market , many of our customers , and 56% ( 56 % ) of the segment 2019s 2008 net sales , were outside the u.s . in 2008 , the largest of these international markets were brazil , china and mexico . as the segment 2019s revenue transactions are largely denominated in local currencies , we are impacted by the weakening in the value of these local currencies against the u.s . dollar . a number of our more significant international markets , particularly in latin america , were impacted by this trend in late 2008 . home and networks mobility segment the home and networks mobility segment designs , manufactures , sells , installs and services : ( i ) digital video , internet protocol video and broadcast network interactive set-tops , end-to-end video distribution systems , broadband access infrastructure platforms , and associated data and voice customer premise equipment to cable television and telecom service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 2018 2018home business 2019 2019 ) , and ( ii ) wireless access systems , including cellular infrastructure systems and wireless broadband systems , to wireless service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 2018 2018network business 2019 2019 ) . in 2009 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 36% ( 36 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 33% ( 33 % ) in 2008 and 27% ( 27 % ) in 2007 . years ended december 31 percent change ( dollars in millions ) 2009 2008 2007 2009 20142008 2008 20142007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 2009</td><td>years ended december 31 2008</td><td>years ended december 31 2007</td><td>years ended december 31 2009 20142008</td><td>2008 20142007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>segment net sales</td><td>$ 7963</td><td>$ 10086</td><td>$ 10014</td><td>( 21 ) % ( % )</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating earnings</td><td>558</td><td>918</td><td>709</td><td>( 39 ) % ( % )</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td></tr></table> segment results 20142009 compared to 2008 in 2009 , the segment 2019s net sales were $ 8.0 billion , a decrease of 21% ( 21 % ) compared to net sales of $ 10.1 billion in 2008 . the 21% ( 21 % ) decrease in net sales reflects a 22% ( 22 % ) decrease in net sales in the networks business and a 21% ( 21 % ) decrease in net sales in the home business . the 22% ( 22 % ) decrease in net sales in the networks business was primarily driven by lower net sales of gsm , cdma , umts and iden infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales of wimax products . the 21% ( 21 % ) decrease in net sales in the home business was primarily driven by a 24% ( 24 % ) decrease in net sales of digital entertainment devices , reflecting : ( i ) an 18% ( 18 % ) decrease in shipments of digital entertainment devices , primarily due to lower shipments to large cable and telecommunications operators in north america as a result of macroeconomic conditions , and ( ii ) a lower asp due to an unfavorable shift in product mix . the segment shipped 14.7 million digital entertainment devices in 2009 , compared to 18.0 million shipped in 2008 . on a geographic basis , the 21% ( 21 % ) decrease in net sales was driven by lower net sales in all regions . the decrease in net sales in north america was primarily due to : ( i ) lower net sales in the home business , and ( ii ) lower net sales of cdma and iden infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales of wimax products . the decrease in net sales in emea was primarily due to lower net sales of gsm infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales of wimax products and higher net sales in the home business . the decrease in net sales in asia was primarily driven by lower net sales of gsm , umts and cdma infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales in the home business . the decrease in net sales in latin america was primarily due to : ( i ) lower net sales in the home business , and ( ii ) lower net sales of iden infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales of wimax products . net sales in north america accounted for approximately 51% ( 51 % ) of the segment 2019s total net sales in 2009 , compared to approximately 50% ( 50 % ) of the segment 2019s total net sales in 2008. .\nQuestion: what is the product of segment net sales in 2009 by the percent of overall sales represented?\nAnswer: 2866.68\nQuestion: what is the segment net sales in 2007 times the percentage of overall sales?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2703.78" } ]
CONVFINQA7642	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin september 2006 , the fasb issued sfas 158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 , and 132 ( r ) . 201d sfas 158 requires companies to recognize the over-funded and under-funded status of defined benefit pension and other postretire- ment plans as assets or liabilities on their balance sheets . in addition , changes in the funded status must be recognized through other comprehensive income in shareholders 2019 equity in the year in which the changes occur . we adopted sfas 158 on september 28 , 2007 . in accordance with the transition rules in sfas 158 , this standard is being adopted on a prospective basis . the adoption of sfas 158 resulted in an immaterial adjustment to our balance sheet , and had no impact on our net earnings or cash flows . comprehensive income ( loss ) the company accounts for comprehensive income ( loss ) in accordance with the provisions of sfas no . 130 , 201creporting comprehensive income 201d ( 201csfas no . 130 201d ) . sfas no . 130 is a financial statement presentation standard that requires the company to disclose non-owner changes included in equity but not included in net income or loss . accumulated comprehensive loss presented in the financial statements consists of adjustments to the company 2019s minimum pension liability as follows ( in thousands ) : pension adjustments accumulated comprehensive . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>pension adjustments</td><td>accumulated other comprehensive loss</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of september 30 2005</td><td>-1137 ( 1137 )</td><td>-1137 ( 1137 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>change in period</td><td>538</td><td>538</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance as of september 29 2006</td><td>$ -599 ( 599 )</td><td>$ -599 ( 599 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>pension adjustment</td><td>159</td><td>159</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>adjustment to initially apply sfas 158</td><td>226</td><td>226</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance as of september 28 2007</td><td>$ -214 ( 214 )</td><td>$ -214 ( 214 )</td></tr></table> recently issued accounting pronouncements fin 48 in july 2006 , the fasb issued fasb interpretation no . 48 , 201caccounting for uncertainty in income taxes 2014 an interpretation of fasb statement no . 109 201d ( fin 48 ) , which clarifies the accounting and disclosure for uncertainty in tax positions , as defined . fin 48 seeks to reduce the diversity in practice associated with certain aspects of the recognition and measurement related to accounting for income taxes . this interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2006 , and is therefore effective for the company in fiscal year 2008 . we are currently evaluating the impact that adopting fin 48 will have on the company 2019s financial position and results of operations , however at this time the company does not expect the impact to materially affect its results from operations or financial position . sfas 157 in september 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no . 157 , 201cfair value measurements 201d ( 201csfas 157 201d ) which defines fair value , establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements . sfas 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years . the company has not yet determined the impact that sfas 157 will have on its results from operations or financial position . sab 108 in september 2006 , the securities and exchange commission issued staff accounting bulletin no . 108 , 201cconsidering the effects of prior year misstatements when quantifying misstatements in current year financial statements 201d ( 201csab 108 201d ) , which provides interpretive guidance on how the effects of the carryover or reversal of skyworks solutions , inc . 2007 annual report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what is the net change in the balance of pension liability from september 2005 to 2007?\nAnswer: 923.0\nQuestion: what is the impact of pension adjustment during 2007?\nAnswer: 159.0\nQuestion: what is the impact of adjustment to initially apply sfas 158 during 2007?\nAnswer: 226.0\nQuestion: what is the total impact in the balance of pension liability during 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "385.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6632	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\no 2019 r e i l l y a u t o m o t i v e 2 0 0 6 a n n u a l r e p o r t p a g e 38 $ 11080000 , in the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested awards at december 31 , 2006 , was $ 7702000 and the weighted-average period of time over which this cost will be recognized is 3.3 years . employee stock purchase plan the company 2019s employee stock purchase plan permits all eligible employees to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the fair market value . participants may authorize the company to withhold up to 5% ( 5 % ) of their annual salary to participate in the plan . the stock purchase plan authorizes up to 2600000 shares to be granted . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company issued 165306 shares under the purchase plan at a weighted average price of $ 27.36 per share . during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company issued 161903 shares under the purchase plan at a weighted average price of $ 27.57 per share . during the year ended december 31 , 2004 , the company issued 187754 shares under the purchase plan at a weighted average price of $ 20.85 per share . sfas no . 123r requires compensation expense to be recognized based on the discount between the grant date fair value and the employee purchase price for shares sold to employees . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded $ 799000 of compensation cost related to employee share purchases and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 295000 . at december 31 , 2006 , approximately 400000 shares were reserved for future issuance . other employee benefit plans the company sponsors a contributory profit sharing and savings plan that covers substantially all employees who are at least 21 years of age and have at least six months of service . the company has agreed to make matching contributions equal to 50% ( 50 % ) of the first 2% ( 2 % ) of each employee 2019s wages that are contributed and 25% ( 25 % ) of the next 4% ( 4 % ) of each employee 2019s wages that are contributed . the company also makes additional discretionary profit sharing contributions to the plan on an annual basis as determined by the board of directors . the company 2019s matching and profit sharing contributions under this plan are funded in the form of shares of the company 2019s common stock . a total of 4200000 shares of common stock have been authorized for issuance under this plan . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded $ 6429000 of compensation cost for contributions to this plan and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 2372000 . during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company recorded $ 6606000 of compensation cost for contributions to this plan and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 2444000 . during the year ended december 31 , 2004 , the company recorded $ 5278000 of compensation cost for contributions to this plan and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 1969000 . the compensation cost recorded in 2006 includes matching contributions made in 2006 and profit sharing contributions accrued in 2006 to be funded with issuance of shares of common stock in 2007 . the company issued 204000 shares in 2006 to fund profit sharing and matching contributions at an average grant date fair value of $ 34.34 . the company issued 210461 shares in 2005 to fund profit sharing and matching contributions at an average grant date fair value of $ 25.79 . the company issued 238828 shares in 2004 to fund profit sharing and matching contributions at an average grant date fair value of $ 19.36 . a portion of these shares related to profit sharing contributions accrued in prior periods . at december 31 , 2006 , approximately 1061000 shares were reserved for future issuance under this plan . the company has in effect a performance incentive plan for the company 2019s senior management under which the company awards shares of restricted stock that vest equally over a three-year period and are held in escrow until such vesting has occurred . shares are forfeited when an employee ceases employment . a total of 800000 shares of common stock have been authorized for issuance under this plan . shares awarded under this plan are valued based on the market price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant and compensation cost is recorded over the vesting period . the company recorded $ 416000 of compensation cost for this plan for the year ended december 31 , 2006 and recognized a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 154000 . the company recorded $ 289000 of compensation cost for this plan for the year ended december 31 , 2005 and recognized a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 107000 . the company recorded $ 248000 of compensation cost for this plan for the year ended december 31 , 2004 and recognized a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 93000 . the total fair value of shares vested ( at vest date ) for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 were $ 503000 , $ 524000 and $ 335000 , respectively . the remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested awards at december 31 , 2006 was $ 536000 . the company awarded 18698 shares under this plan in 2006 with an average grant date fair value of $ 33.12 . the company awarded 14986 shares under this plan in 2005 with an average grant date fair value of $ 25.41 . the company awarded 15834 shares under this plan in 2004 with an average grant date fair value of $ 19.05 . compensation cost for shares awarded in 2006 will be recognized over the three-year vesting period . changes in the company 2019s restricted stock for the year ended december 31 , 2006 were as follows : weighted- average grant date shares fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares</td><td>weighted-average grant date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-vested at december 31 2005</td><td>15052</td><td>$ 22.68</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted during the period</td><td>18698</td><td>33.12</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested during the period</td><td>-15685 ( 15685 )</td><td>26.49</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited during the period</td><td>-1774 ( 1774 )</td><td>27.94</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-vested at december 31 2006</td><td>16291</td><td>$ 30.80</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2006 , approximately 659000 shares were reserved for future issuance under this plan . n o t e s t o c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( cont inued ) .\nQuestion: how many shares were issued in 2006?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "165306.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5740	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncustomary conditions . we will retain a 20% ( 20 % ) equity interest in the joint venture . as of december 31 , 2008 , the joint venture has acquired seven properties from us and we received year-to-date net sale proceeds and financing distributions of approximately $ 251.6 million . in january 2008 , we sold a tract of land to an unconsolidated joint venture in which we hold a 50% ( 50 % ) equity interest and received a distribution , commensurate to our partner 2019s 50% ( 50 % ) ownership interest , of approximately $ 38.3 million . in november 2008 , that unconsolidated joint venture entered a loan agreement with a consortium of banks and distributed a portion of the loan proceeds to us and our partner , with our share of the distribution totaling $ 20.4 million . uses of liquidity our principal uses of liquidity include the following : 2022 property investment ; 2022 recurring leasing/capital costs ; 2022 dividends and distributions to shareholders and unitholders ; 2022 long-term debt maturities ; 2022 opportunistic repurchases of outstanding debt ; and 2022 other contractual obligations . property investment we evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon market outlook , supply and long-term growth potential . our ability to make future property investments is dependent upon our continued access to our longer-term sources of liquidity including the issuances of debt or equity securities as well as disposing of selected properties . in light of current economic conditions , management continues to evaluate our investment priorities and we are limiting new development expenditures . recurring expenditures one of our principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the recurring leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following is a summary of our recurring capital expenditures for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>recurring tenant improvements</td><td>$ 36885</td><td>$ 45296</td><td>$ 41895</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>recurring leasing costs</td><td>28205</td><td>32238</td><td>32983</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>building improvements</td><td>9724</td><td>8402</td><td>8122</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>totals</td><td>$ 74814</td><td>$ 85936</td><td>$ 83000</td></tr></table> dividends and distributions in order to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes , we must currently distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our taxable income to shareholders . because depreciation is a non-cash expense , cash flow will typically be greater than operating income . we paid dividends per share of $ 1.93 , $ 1.91 and $ 1.89 for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . we expect to continue to distribute taxable earnings to meet the requirements to maintain our reit status . however , distributions are declared at the discretion of our board of directors and are subject to actual cash available for distribution , our financial condition , capital requirements and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant . in january 2009 , our board of directors resolved to decrease our annual dividend from $ 1.94 per share to $ 1.00 per share in order to retain additional cash to help meet our capital needs . we anticipate retaining additional cash of approximately $ 145.2 million per year , when compared to an annual dividend of $ 1.94 per share , as the result of this action . at december 31 , 2008 we had six series of preferred shares outstanding . the annual dividend rates on our preferred shares range between 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) and are paid in arrears quarterly. .\nQuestion: what was the total recurring capital expenditure in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "85936.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5342	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\naugusta , georgia mill and $ 2 million of costs associated with the sale of the shorewood business . consumer packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 2940</td><td>$ 3403</td><td>$ 3435</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit ( loss )</td><td>-25 ( 25 )</td><td>178</td><td>161</td></tr></table> north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 1.9 billion in 2015 compared with $ 2.0 billion in 2014 and $ 2.0 billion in 2013 . operating profits were $ 81 million ( $ 91 million excluding the cost associated with the planned conversion of our riegelwood mill to 100% ( 100 % ) pulp production , net of proceeds from the sale of the carolina coated bristols brand , and sheet plant closure costs ) in 2015 compared with $ 92 million ( $ 100 million excluding sheet plant closure costs ) in 2014 and $ 63 million ( $ 110 million excluding paper machine shutdown costs and costs related to the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2013 . coated paperboard sales volumes in 2015 were lower than in 2014 reflecting weaker market demand . the business took about 77000 tons of market-related downtime in 2015 compared with about 41000 tons in 2014 . average sales price realizations increased modestly year over year as competitive pressures in the current year only partially offset the impact of sales price increases implemented in 2014 . input costs decreased for energy and chemicals , but wood costs increased . planned maintenance downtime costs were $ 10 million lower in 2015 . operating costs were higher , mainly due to inflation and overhead costs . foodservice sales volumes increased in 2015 compared with 2014 reflecting strong market demand . average sales margins increased due to lower resin costs and a more favorable mix . operating costs and distribution costs were both higher . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2016 , coated paperboard sales volumes are expected to be slightly lower than in the fourth quarter of 2015 due to our exit from the coated bristols market . average sales price realizations are expected to be flat , but margins should benefit from a more favorable product mix . input costs are expected to be higher for wood , chemicals and energy . planned maintenance downtime costs should be $ 4 million higher with a planned maintenance outage scheduled at our augusta mill in the first quarter . foodservice sales volumes are expected to be seasonally lower . average sales margins are expected to improve due to a more favorable mix . operating costs are expected to decrease . european consumer packaging net sales in 2015 were $ 319 million compared with $ 365 million in 2014 and $ 380 million in 2013 . operating profits in 2015 were $ 87 million compared with $ 91 million in 2014 and $ 100 million in 2013 . sales volumes in 2015 compared with 2014 increased in europe , but decreased in russia . average sales margins improved in russia due to slightly higher average sales price realizations and a more favorable mix . in europe average sales margins decreased reflecting lower average sales price realizations and an unfavorable mix . input costs were lower in europe , primarily for wood and energy , but were higher in russia , primarily for wood . looking forward to the first quarter of 2016 , compared with the fourth quarter of 2015 , sales volumes are expected to be stable . average sales price realizations are expected to be slightly higher in both russia and europe . input costs are expected to be flat , while operating costs are expected to increase . asian consumer packaging the company sold its 55% ( 55 % ) equity share in the ip-sun jv in october 2015 . net sales and operating profits presented below include results through september 30 , 2015 . net sales were $ 682 million in 2015 compared with $ 1.0 billion in 2014 and $ 1.1 billion in 2013 . operating profits in 2015 were a loss of $ 193 million ( a loss of $ 19 million excluding goodwill and other asset impairment costs ) compared with losses of $ 5 million in 2014 and $ 2 million in 2013 . sales volumes and average sales price realizations were lower in 2015 due to over-supplied market conditions and competitive pressures . average sales margins were also negatively impacted by a less favorable mix . input costs and freight costs were lower and operating costs also decreased . on october 13 , 2015 , the company finalized the sale of its 55% ( 55 % ) interest in ip asia coated paperboard ( ip- sun jv ) business , within the company's consumer packaging segment , to its chinese coated board joint venture partner , shandong sun holding group co. , ltd . for rmb 149 million ( approximately usd $ 23 million ) . during the third quarter of 2015 , a determination was made that the current book value of the asset group exceeded its estimated fair value of $ 23 million , which was the agreed upon selling price . the 2015 loss includes the net pre-tax impairment charge of $ 174 million ( $ 113 million after taxes ) . a pre-tax charge of $ 186 million was recorded during the third quarter in the company's consumer packaging segment to write down the long-lived assets of this business to their estimated fair value . in the fourth quarter of 2015 , upon the sale and corresponding deconsolidation of ip-sun jv from the company's consolidated balance sheet , final adjustments were made resulting in a reduction of the impairment of $ 12 million . the amount of pre-tax losses related to noncontrolling interest of the ip-sun jv included in the company's consolidated statement of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 19 million , $ 12 million and $ 8 million , respectively . the amount of pre-tax losses related to the ip-sun jv included in the company's .\nQuestion: what is the value of consumer packaging sales from north american consumer packaging in 2015 times 1000?\nAnswer: 1900.0\nQuestion: what was total sales in 2015?\nAnswer: 2940.0\nQuestion: what is the ratio to total sales?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.64626" } ]
CONVFINQA2359	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 11 . commitments and contingencies commitments leases the company fffds corporate headquarters is located in danvers , massachusetts . this facility encompasses most of the company fffds u.s . operations , including research and development , manufacturing , sales and marketing and general and administrative departments . in october 2017 , the acquired its corporate headquarters for approximately $ 16.5 million and terminated its existing lease arrangement ( see note 6 ) . future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable leases as of march 31 , 2018 are approximately as follows : fiscal years ending march 31 , operating leases ( in $ 000s ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years ending march 31,</td><td>operating leases ( in $ 000s )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 2078</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>1888</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>1901</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>1408</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023</td><td>891</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1923</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 10089</td></tr></table> in february 2017 , the company entered into a lease agreement for an additional 21603 square feet of office space in danvers , massachusetts which expires on july 31 , 2022 . in december 2017 , the company entered into an amendment to this lease to extend the term through august 31 , 2025 and to add an additional 6607 square feet of space in which rent would begin around june 1 , 2018 . the amendment also allows the company a right of first offer to purchase the property from january 1 , 2018 through august 31 , 2035 , if the lessor decides to sell the building or receives an offer to purchase the building from a third-party buyer . in march 2018 , the company entered into an amendment to the lease to add an additional 11269 square feet of space for which rent will begin on or around june 1 , 2018 through august 31 , 2025 . the annual rent expense for this lease agreement is estimated to be $ 0.4 million . in september 2016 , the company entered into a lease agreement in berlin , germany which commenced in may 2017 and expires in may 2024 . the annual rent expense for the lease is estimated to be $ 0.3 million . in october 2016 , the company entered into a lease agreement for an office in tokyokk japan and expires in september 2021 . the office houses administrative , regulatory , and training personnel in connection with the company fffds commercial launch in japan . the annual rent expense for the lease is estimated to be $ 0.9 million . license agreements in april 2014 , the company entered into an exclusive license agreement for the rights to certain optical sensor technologies in the field of cardio-circulatory assist devices . pursuant to the terms of the license agreement , the company agreed to make potential payments of $ 6.0 million . through march 31 , 2018 , the company has made $ 3.5 million in milestones payments which included a $ 1.5 million upfront payment upon the execution of the agreement . any potential future milestone payment amounts have not been included in the contractual obligations table above due to the uncertainty related to the successful achievement of these milestones . contingencies from time to time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types . in some actions , the claimants seek damages , as well as other relief , which , if granted , would require significant expenditures . the company records a liability in its consolidated financial statements for these matters when a loss is known or considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated . the company reviews these estimates each accounting period as additional information is known and adjusts the loss provision when appropriate . if a matter is both probable to result in liability and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated , the company estimates and discloses the possible loss or range of loss . if the loss is not probable or cannot be reasonably estimated , a liability is not recorded in its consolidated financial statements. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in operating leases from 2019 to 2020?\nAnswer: -190.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.09143" } ]
CONVFINQA7727	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nitem 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations results of operations 2013 highmount 2013 ( continued ) highmount 2019s revenues , profitability and future growth depend substantially on natural gas and ngl prices and highmount 2019s ability to increase its natural gas and ngl production . in recent years , there has been significant price volatility in natural gas and ngl prices due to a variety of factors highmount cannot control or predict . these factors , which include weather conditions , political and economic events , and competition from other energy sources , impact supply and demand for natural gas , which determines the pricing . in recent months , natural gas prices decreased significantly due largely to increased onshore natural gas production , plentiful levels of working gas in storage and reduced commercial demand . the increase in the onshore natural gas production was due largely to increased production from 201cunconventional 201d sources of natural gas such as shale gas , coalbed methane , tight sandstones and methane hydrates , made possible in recent years by modern technology in creating extensive artificial fractures around well bores and advances in horizontal drilling technology . other key factors contributing to the softness of natural gas prices likely included a lower level of industrial demand for natural gas , as a result of the ongoing economic downturn , and relatively low crude oil prices . due to industry conditions , in february of 2009 highmount elected to terminate contracts for five drilling rigs at its permian basin property in the sonora , texas area . the estimated fee payable to the rig contractor for exercising this early termination right will be approximately $ 23 million . in light of these developments , highmount will reduce 2009 production volumes through decreased drilling activity . in addition , the price highmount realizes for its gas production is affected by highmount 2019s hedging activities as well as locational differences in market prices . highmount 2019s decision to increase its natural gas production is dependent upon highmount 2019s ability to realize attractive returns on its capital investment program . returns are affected by commodity prices , capital and operating costs . highmount 2019s operating income , which represents revenues less operating expenses , is primarily affected by revenue factors , but is also a function of varying levels of production expenses , production and ad valorem taxes , as well as depreciation , depletion and amortization ( 201cdd&a 201d ) expenses . highmount 2019s production expenses represent all costs incurred to operate and maintain wells and related equipment and facilities . the principal components of highmount 2019s production expenses are , among other things , direct and indirect costs of labor and benefits , repairs and maintenance , materials , supplies and fuel . in general , during 2008 highmount 2019s labor costs increased primarily due to higher salary levels and continued upward pressure on salaries and wages as a result of the increased competition for skilled workers . in response to these market conditions , in 2008 highmount implemented retention programs , including increases in compensation . production expenses during 2008 were also affected by increases in the cost of fuel , materials and supplies . the higher cost environment discussed above continued during all of 2008 . during the fourth quarter of 2008 the price of natural gas declined significantly while operating expenses remained high . this environment of low commodity prices and high operating expenses continued until december of 2008 when highmount began to see evidence of decreasing operating expenses and drilling costs . highmount 2019s production and ad valorem taxes increase primarily when prices of natural gas and ngls increase , but they are also affected by changes in production , as well as appreciated property values . highmount calculates depletion using the units-of-production method , which depletes the capitalized costs and future development costs associated with evaluated properties based on the ratio of production volumes for the current period to total remaining reserve volumes for the evaluated properties . highmount 2019s depletion expense is affected by its capital spending program and projected future development costs , as well as reserve changes resulting from drilling programs , well performance , and revisions due to changing commodity prices . presented below are production and sales statistics related to highmount 2019s operations: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31</td><td>2008</td><td>2007 ( a )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gas production ( bcf )</td><td>78.9</td><td>34.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gas sales ( bcf )</td><td>72.5</td><td>31.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>oil production/sales ( mbbls )</td><td>351.3</td><td>114.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ngl production/sales ( mbbls )</td><td>3507.4</td><td>1512.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>equivalent production ( bcfe )</td><td>102.0</td><td>43.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>equivalent sales ( bcfe )</td><td>95.7</td><td>41.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>average realized prices without hedging results:</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>gas ( per mcf )</td><td>$ 8.25</td><td>$ 5.95</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>ngl ( per bbl )</td><td>51.26</td><td>51.02</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>oil ( per bbl )</td><td>95.26</td><td>83.37</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>equivalent ( per mcfe )</td><td>8.48</td><td>6.65</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the growth rate in gas production between the years of 2007 and 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2.32059" } ]
CONVFINQA5145	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n31 , 2015 , the price was r$ 218/mwh . after the expiration of contract with eletropaulo , tiet ea's strategy is to contract most of its physical guarantee , as described in regulatory framework section below , and sell the remaining portion in the spot market . tiet ea's strategy is reassessed from time to time according to changes in market conditions , hydrology and other factors . tiet ea has been continuously selling its available energy from 2016 forward through medium-term bilateral contracts of three to five years . as of december 31 , 2016 , tiet ea's contracted portfolio position is 95% ( 95 % ) and 88% ( 88 % ) with average prices of r$ 157/ mwh and r$ 159/mwh ( inflation adjusted until december 2016 ) for 2016 and 2017 , respectively . as brazil is mostly a hydro-based country with energy prices highly tied to the hydrological situation , the deterioration of the hydrology since the beginning of 2014 caused an increase in energy prices going forward . tiet ea is closely monitoring and analyzing system supply conditions to support energy commercialization decisions . under the concession agreement , tiet ea has an obligation to increase its capacity by 15% ( 15 % ) . tiet ea , as well as other concession generators , have not yet met this requirement due to regulatory , environmental , hydrological and fuel constraints . the state of s e3o paulo does not have a sufficient potential for wind power and only has a small remaining potential for hydro projects . as such , the capacity increases in the state will mostly be derived from thermal gas capacity projects . due to the highly complex process to obtain an environmental license for coal projects , tiet ea decided to fulfill its obligation with gas-fired projects in line with the federal government plans . petrobras refuses to supply natural gas and to offer capacity in its pipelines and regasification terminals . therefore , there are no regulations for natural gas swaps in place , and it is unfeasible to bring natural gas to aes tiet ea . a legal case has been initiated by the state of s e3o paulo requiring the investment to be performed . tiet ea is in the process of analyzing options to meet the obligation . uruguaiana is a 640 mw gas-fired combined cycle power plant located in the town of uruguaiana in the state of rio grande do sul , commissioned in december 2000 . aes manages and has a 46% ( 46 % ) economic interest in the plant with the remaining interest held by bndes . the plant's operations were suspended in april 2009 due to the unavailability of gas . aes has evaluated several alternatives to bring gas supply on a competitive basis to uruguaiana . one of the challenges is the capacity restrictions on the argentinean pipeline , especially during the winter season when gas demand in argentina is very high . the plant operated on a short-term basis during february and march 2013 , march through may 2014 , and february through may 2015 due to the short-term supply of lng for the facility . the plant did not operate in 2016 . uruguaiana continues to work toward securing gas on a long-term basis . market structure 2014 brazil has installed capacity of 150136 mw , which is 65% ( 65 % ) hydroelectric , 19% ( 19 % ) thermal and 16% ( 16 % ) renewable ( biomass and wind ) . brazil's national grid is divided into four subsystems . tiet ea is in the southeast and uruguaiana is in the south subsystems of the national grid . regulatory framework 2014 in brazil , the ministry of mines and energy determines the maximum amount of energy that a plant can sell , called physical guarantee , which represents the long-term average expected energy production of the plant . under current rules , physical guarantee can be sold to distribution companies through long- term regulated auctions or under unregulated bilateral contracts with large consumers or energy trading companies . the national system operator ( \"ons\" ) is responsible for coordinating and controlling the operation of the national grid . the ons dispatches generators based on hydrological conditions , reservoir levels , electricity demand and the prices of fuel and thermal generation . given the importance of hydro generation in the country , the ons sometimes reduces dispatch of hydro facilities and increases dispatch of thermal facilities to protect reservoir levels in the system . in brazil , the system operator controls all hydroelectric generation dispatch and reservoir levels . a mechanism known as the energy reallocation mechanism ( \"mre\" ) was created to share hydrological risk across mre hydro generators . if the hydro plants generate less than the total mre physical guarantee , the hydro generators may need to purchase energy in the short-term market to fulfill their contract obligations . when total hydro generation is higher than the total mre physical guarantee , the surplus is proportionally shared among its participants and they are able to make extra revenue selling the excess energy on the spot market . the consequences of unfavorable hydrology are ( i ) thermal plants more expensive to the system being dispatched , ( ii ) lower hydropower generation with deficits in the mre and ( iii ) high spot prices . aneel defines the spot price cap for electricity in the brazilian market . the spot price caps as defined by aneel and average spot prices by calendar year are as follows ( r$ / . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>spot price cap as defined by aneel</td><td>534</td><td>423</td><td>388</td><td>822</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average spot rate</td><td>-</td><td>94</td><td>287</td><td>689</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the average spot rate in 2015?\nAnswer: 287.0\nQuestion: and for 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "689.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10532	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nreinsurance commissions , fees and other revenue increased 1% ( 1 % ) driven by a favorable foreign currency translation of 2% ( 2 % ) and was partially offset by a 1% ( 1 % ) decline in dispositions , net of acquisitions and other . organic revenue was flat primarily resulting from strong growth in the capital market transactions and advisory business , partially offset by declines in global facultative placements . operating income operating income increased $ 120 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , from 2010 to $ 1.3 billion in 2011 . in 2011 , operating income margins in this segment were 19.3% ( 19.3 % ) , up 70 basis points from 18.6% ( 18.6 % ) in 2010 . operating margin improvement was primarily driven by revenue growth , reduced costs of restructuring initiatives and realization of the benefits of those restructuring plans , which was partially offset by the negative impact of expense increases related to investment in the business , lease termination costs , legacy receivables write-off , and foreign currency exchange rates . hr solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 4501</td><td>$ 2111</td><td>$ 1267</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>448</td><td>234</td><td>203</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>10.0% ( 10.0 % )</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>16.0% ( 16.0 % )</td></tr></table> in october 2010 , we completed the acquisition of hewitt , one of the world 2019s leading human resource consulting and outsourcing companies . hewitt operates globally together with aon 2019s existing consulting and outsourcing operations under the newly created aon hewitt brand . hewitt 2019s operating results are included in aon 2019s results of operations beginning october 1 , 2010 . our hr solutions segment generated approximately 40% ( 40 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2011 and provides a broad range of human capital services , as follows : 2022 health and benefits advises clients about how to structure , fund , and administer employee benefit programs that attract , retain , and motivate employees . benefits consulting includes health and welfare , executive benefits , workforce strategies and productivity , absence management , benefits administration , data-driven health , compliance , employee commitment , investment advisory and elective benefits services . effective january 1 , 2012 , this line of business will be included in the results of the risk solutions segment . 2022 retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , investment consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration . 2022 compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries . 2022 strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management . 2022 benefits administration applies our hr expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services . our model replaces the resource-intensive processes once required to administer benefit plans with more efficient , effective , and less costly solutions . 2022 human resource business processing outsourcing ( 2018 2018hr bpo 2019 2019 ) provides market-leading solutions to manage employee data ; administer benefits , payroll and other human resources processes ; and .\nQuestion: what was the net change in operating income from 2010 to 2011?\nAnswer: 214.0\nQuestion: what was the operating income in 2010?\nAnswer: 234.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.91453" } ]
CONVFINQA7567	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nto the two-class method . the provisions of this guidance were required for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2008 . the company has adopted this guidance for current period computations of earnings per share , and has updated prior period computations of earnings per share . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have a material impact on the company 2019s computation of earnings per share . refer to note 11 for further discussion . in june 2008 , the fasb issued accounting guidance addressing the determination of whether provisions that introduce adjustment features ( including contingent adjustment features ) would prevent treating a derivative contract or an embedded derivative on a company 2019s own stock as indexed solely to the company 2019s stock . this guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2008 . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in march 2008 , the fasb issued accounting guidance intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity 2019s financial position , financial performance , and cash flows . this guidance was effective for the fiscal years and interim periods beginning after november 15 , 2008 . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in december 2007 , the fasb issued replacement guidance that requires the acquirer of a business to recognize and measure the identifiable assets acquired , the liabilities assumed , and any non-controlling interest in the acquired entity at fair value . this replacement guidance also requires transaction costs related to the business combination to be expensed as incurred . it was effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date was on or after the start of the fiscal year beginning after december 15 , 2008 . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in december 2007 , the fasb issued accounting guidance that establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary . this guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2008 . the adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in september 2006 , the fasb issued accounting guidance which defines fair value , establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements . this guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2007 , however the fasb delayed the effective date to fiscal years beginning after november 15 , 2008 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities , except those items recognized or disclosed at fair value on an annual or more frequent basis . the adoption of this guidance for nonfinancial assets and liabilities in the first quarter of 2009 did not have any impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . 3 . inventories inventories consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>december 31 , 2009</td><td>december 31 , 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>finished goods</td><td>$ 155596</td><td>$ 187072</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>raw materials</td><td>785</td><td>731</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>work-in-process</td><td>71</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>subtotal inventories</td><td>156452</td><td>187809</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>inventories reserve</td><td>-7964 ( 7964 )</td><td>-5577 ( 5577 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total inventories</td><td>$ 148488</td><td>$ 182232</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the total of finished goods in 2009, in thousands?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "155596.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5605	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmeasurement point december 31 booking holdings nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>measurement pointdecember 31</td><td>booking holdings inc .</td><td>nasdaqcomposite index</td><td>s&p 500index</td><td>rdg internetcomposite</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>187.37</td><td>141.63</td><td>132.39</td><td>163.02</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>183.79</td><td>162.09</td><td>150.51</td><td>158.81</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>205.51</td><td>173.33</td><td>152.59</td><td>224.05</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>236.31</td><td>187.19</td><td>170.84</td><td>235.33</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2017</td><td>280.10</td><td>242.29</td><td>208.14</td><td>338.52</td></tr></table> sales of unregistered securities between october 1 , 2017 and december 31 , 2017 , we issued 103343 shares of our common stock in connection with the conversion of $ 196.1 million principal amount of our 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) convertible senior notes due 2018 . the conversions were effected in accordance with the indenture , which provides that the principal amount of converted notes be paid in cash and the conversion premium be paid in cash and/or shares of common stock at our election . in each case , we chose to pay the conversion premium in shares of common stock ( fractional shares are paid in cash ) . the issuances of the shares were not registered under the securities act of 1933 , as amended ( the \"act\" ) pursuant to section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) of the act. .\nQuestion: what was the difference between the booking holdings inc. of 2017 and 2012?\nAnswer: 180.1\nQuestion: how much, in percentage, does that difference represent in relation to the booking holdings inc. of 2012?\nAnswer: 1.801\nQuestion: and what was the difference between the s&p 500 index of 2017 and 2012?\nAnswer: 108.14\nQuestion: how much, in percentage, does that difference represent in relation to the s&p 500 index of 2012?\nAnswer: 1.0814\nQuestion: what is, then, the difference between the percentage difference in booking holdings inc and the one in s&p 500 index?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.7196" } ]
CONVFINQA4876	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our ordinary shares have been publicly traded since november 17 , 2011 when our ordinary shares were listed and began trading on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) under the symbol 201cdlph . 201d on december 4 , 2017 , following the spin-off of delphi technologies , the company changed its name to aptiv plc and its nyse symbol to 201captv . 201d as of january 25 , 2019 , there were 2 shareholders of record of our ordinary shares . the following graph reflects the comparative changes in the value from december 31 , 2013 through december 31 , 2018 , assuming an initial investment of $ 100 and the reinvestment of dividends , if any in ( 1 ) our ordinary shares , ( 2 ) the s&p 500 index and ( 3 ) the automotive peer group . historical share prices of our ordinary shares have been adjusted to reflect the separation . historical performance may not be indicative of future shareholder returns . stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on december 31 , 2013 in our stock or in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ended december 31 , 2018 . ( 1 ) aptiv plc , adjusted for the distribution of delphi technologies on december 4 , 2017 ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive peer group 2013 adient plc , american axle & manufacturing holdings inc , aptiv plc , borgwarner inc , cooper tire & rubber co , cooper- standard holdings inc , dana inc , dorman products inc , ford motor co , garrett motion inc. , general motors co , gentex corp , gentherm inc , genuine parts co , goodyear tire & rubber co , lear corp , lkq corp , meritor inc , motorcar parts of america inc , standard motor products inc , stoneridge inc , superior industries international inc , tenneco inc , tesla inc , tower international inc , visteon corp , wabco holdings inc company index december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company index</td><td>december 31 2013</td><td>december 31 2014</td><td>december 31 2015</td><td>december 31 2016</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>december 31 2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>aptiv plc ( 1 )</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 122.75</td><td>$ 146.49</td><td>$ 117.11</td><td>$ 178.46</td><td>$ 130.80</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 ( 2 )</td><td>100.00</td><td>113.69</td><td>115.26</td><td>129.05</td><td>157.22</td><td>150.33</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>automotive peer group ( 3 )</td><td>100.00</td><td>107.96</td><td>108.05</td><td>107.72</td><td>134.04</td><td>106.89</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the change in price for aptiv plc between 12/31/13 and 12/31/18?\nAnswer: 30.8\nQuestion: and the price for s&p 500 as of 12/31/18?\nAnswer: 150.33\nQuestion: and the change in price between 12/31/13?\nAnswer: 50.33\nQuestion: so what was the growth for aptiv plc?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.308" } ]
CONVFINQA3003	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 7 . derivative financial instruments under the terms of the credit facility , the company is required to enter into interest rate protection agreements on at least 50% ( 50 % ) of its variable rate debt . under these agreements , the company is exposed to credit risk to the extent that a counterparty fails to meet the terms of a contract . such exposure is limited to the current value of the contract at the time the counterparty fails to perform . the company believes its contracts as of december 31 , 2004 are with credit worthy institutions . as of december 31 , 2004 , the company had two interest rate caps outstanding with an aggregate notional amount of $ 350.0 million ( each at an interest rate of 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) ) that expire in 2006 . as of december 31 , 2003 , the company had three interest rate caps outstanding with an aggregate notional amount of $ 500.0 million ( each at a rate of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) ) that expired in 2004 . as of december 31 , 2004 and 2003 , there was no fair value associated with any of these interest rate caps . during the year ended december 31 , 2003 , the company recorded an unrealized loss of approximately $ 0.3 million ( net of a tax benefit of approximately $ 0.2 million ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of cash flow hedges and reclassified $ 5.9 million ( net of a tax benefit of approximately $ 3.2 million ) into results of operations . during the year ended december 31 , 2002 , the company recorded an unrealized loss of approximately $ 9.1 million ( net of a tax benefit of approximately $ 4.9 million ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of cash flow hedges and reclassified $ 19.5 million ( net of a tax benefit of approximately $ 10.5 million ) into results of operations . hedge ineffectiveness resulted in a gain of approximately $ 1.0 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 , which is recorded in other expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations . the company records the changes in fair value of its derivative instruments that are not accounted for as hedges in other expense . the company did not reclassify any derivative losses into its statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2004 and does not anticipate reclassifying any derivative losses into its statement of operations within the next twelve months , as there are no amounts included in other comprehensive loss as of december 31 , 2004 . 8 . commitments and contingencies lease obligations 2014the company leases certain land , office and tower space under operating leases that expire over various terms . many of the leases contain renewal options with specified increases in lease payments upon exercise of the renewal option . escalation clauses present in operating leases , excluding those tied to cpi or other inflation-based indices , are straight-lined over the term of the lease . ( see note 1. ) future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases include payments for certain renewal periods at the company 2019s option because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable tower site and related revenues from tenant leases , thereby making it reasonably assured that the company will renew the lease . such payments in effect at december 31 , 2004 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2005</td><td>$ 106116</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006</td><td>106319</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2007</td><td>106095</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2008</td><td>106191</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2009</td><td>106214</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1570111</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2101046</td></tr></table> aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2003 and 2002 approximated $ 118741000 , $ 113956000 , and $ 109644000 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the aggregate rent expense in 2003?\nAnswer: 113956000.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2002?\nAnswer: 109644000.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4312000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2380	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nduring the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recognized approximately $ 6.5 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 4.7 million of compensation expense , respectively , for these options . as of december 31 , 2013 , there was approximately $ 20.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years . stock-based compensation effective january 1 , 1999 , we implemented a deferred compensation plan , or the deferred plan , covering certain of our employees , including our executives . the shares issued under the deferred plan were granted to certain employees , including our executives and vesting will occur annually upon the completion of a service period or our meeting established financial performance criteria . annual vesting occurs at rates ranging from 15% ( 15 % ) to 35% ( 35 % ) once performance criteria are reached . a summary of our restricted stock as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 and charges during the years then ended are presented below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>2804901</td><td>2912456</td><td>2728290</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>192563</td><td>92729</td><td>185333</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-3267 ( 3267 )</td><td>-200284 ( 200284 )</td><td>-1167 ( 1167 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>2994197</td><td>2804901</td><td>2912456</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>vested during the year</td><td>21074</td><td>408800</td><td>66299</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>compensation expense recorded</td><td>$ 6713155</td><td>$ 6930381</td><td>$ 17365401</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year</td><td>$ 17386949</td><td>$ 7023942</td><td>$ 21768084</td></tr></table> weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year $ 17386949 $ 7023942 $ 21768084 the fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 1.6 million , $ 22.4 million and $ 4.3 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 17.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.7 years . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , approximately $ 4.5 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 3.4 million , respectively , was capitalized to assets associated with compensation expense related to our long-term compensation plans , restricted stock and stock options . we granted ltip units , which include bonus , time-based and performance based awards , with a fair value of $ 27.1 million , zero and $ 8.5 million as of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . the grant date fair value of the ltip unit awards was calculated in accordance with asc 718 . a third party consultant determined the fair value of the ltip units to have a discount from sl green's common stock price . the discount was calculated by considering the inherent uncertainty that the ltip units will reach parity with other common partnership units and the illiquidity due to transfer restrictions . as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 5.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the time-based and performance based awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.5 years . during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we recorded compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards of approximately $ 27.3 million , $ 12.6 million and $ 8.5 million , respectively . 2010 notional unit long-term compensation plan in december 2009 , the compensation committee of the company's board of directors approved the general terms of the sl green realty corp . 2010 notional unit long-term compensation program , or the 2010 long-term compensation plan . the 2010 long-term compensation plan is a long-term incentive compensation plan pursuant to which award recipients could earn , in the aggregate , from approximately $ 15.0 million up to approximately $ 75.0 million of ltip units in the operating partnership based on our stock price appreciation over three years beginning on december 1 , 2009 ; provided that , if maximum performance had been achieved , approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the second year and an additional approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the third year . in order to achieve maximum performance under the 2010 long-term compensation plan , our aggregate stock price appreciation during the performance period had to equal or exceed 50% ( 50 % ) . the compensation committee determined that maximum performance had been achieved at or shortly after the beginning of each of the second and third years of the performance period and for the full performance period and , accordingly , 366815 ltip units , 385583 ltip units and 327416 ltip units were earned under the 2010 long-term compensation plan in december 2010 , 2011 and 2012 , respectively . substantially in accordance with the original terms of the program , 50% ( 50 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 17 , 2012 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2013 vesting date ) , 25% ( 25 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 11 , 2013 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2014 vesting date ) and the remainder is scheduled to vest on january 1 , 2015 based on .\nQuestion: in 2013, what percentage did the restricted stock that was cancelled represent in relation to the total?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.00116" } ]
CONVFINQA5247	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndisclosure of , the issuance of certain types of guarantees . the adoption of fasb interpretation no . 45 did not have a signif- icant impact on the net income or equity of the company . in january 2003 , fasb interpretation no . 46 , 201cconsolidation of variable interest entities , an interpretation of arb 51 , 201d was issued . the primary objectives of this interpretation , as amended , are to provide guidance on the identification and consolidation of variable interest entities , or vies , which are entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights . the company has completed an analysis of this interpretation and has determined that it does not have any vies . 4 . acquisitions family health plan , inc . effective january 1 , 2004 , the company commenced opera- tions in ohio through the acquisition from family health plan , inc . of certain medicaid-related assets for a purchase price of approximately $ 6800 . the cost to acquire the medicaid-related assets will be allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed according to estimated fair values . hmo blue texas effective august 1 , 2003 , the company acquired certain medicaid-related contract rights of hmo blue texas in the san antonio , texas market for $ 1045 . the purchase price was allocated to acquired contracts , which are being amor- tized on a straight-line basis over a period of five years , the expected period of benefit . group practice affiliates during 2003 , the company acquired a 100% ( 100 % ) ownership interest in group practice affiliates , llc , a behavioral healthcare services company ( 63.7% ( 63.7 % ) in march 2003 and 36.3% ( 36.3 % ) in august 2003 ) . the consolidated financial state- ments include the results of operations of gpa since march 1 , 2003 . the company paid $ 1800 for its purchase of gpa . the cost to acquire the ownership interest has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed according to estimated fair values and is subject to adjustment when additional information concerning asset and liability valuations are finalized . the preliminary allocation has resulted in goodwill of approximately $ 3895 . the goodwill is not amortized and is not deductible for tax purposes . pro forma disclosures related to the acquisition have been excluded as immaterial . scriptassist in march 2003 , the company purchased contract and name rights of scriptassist , llc ( scriptassist ) , a medication com- pliance company . the purchase price of $ 563 was allocated to acquired contracts , which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of five years , the expected period of benefit . the investor group who held membership interests in scriptassist included one of the company 2019s executive officers . university health plans , inc . on december 1 , 2002 , the company purchased 80% ( 80 % ) of the outstanding capital stock of university health plans , inc . ( uhp ) in new jersey . in october 2003 , the company exercised its option to purchase the remaining 20% ( 20 % ) of the outstanding capital stock . centene paid a total purchase price of $ 13258 . the results of operations for uhp are included in the consolidated financial statements since december 1 , 2002 . the acquisition of uhp resulted in identified intangible assets of $ 3800 , representing purchased contract rights and provider network . the intangibles are being amortized over a ten-year period . goodwill of $ 7940 is not amortized and is not deductible for tax purposes . changes during 2003 to the preliminary purchase price allocation primarily consisted of the purchase of the remaining 20% ( 20 % ) of the outstanding stock and the recognition of intangible assets and related deferred tax liabilities . the following unaudited pro forma information presents the results of operations of centene and subsidiaries as if the uhp acquisition described above had occurred as of january 1 , 2001 . these pro forma results may not necessar- ily reflect the actual results of operations that would have been achieved , nor are they necessarily indicative of future results of operations. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 567048</td><td>$ 395155</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net earnings</td><td>25869</td><td>11573</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>diluted earnings per common share</td><td>1.48</td><td>1.00</td></tr></table> diluted earnings per common share 1.48 1.00 texas universities health plan in june 2002 , the company purchased schip contracts in three texas service areas . the cash purchase price of $ 595 was recorded as purchased contract rights , which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over five years , the expected period of benefit . bankers reserve in march 2002 , the company acquired bankers reserve life insurance company of wisconsin for a cash purchase price of $ 3527 . the company allocated the purchase price to net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their fair value . centene allocated $ 479 to identifiable intangible assets , representing the value assigned to acquired licenses , which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) centene corporation and subsidiaries .\nQuestion: what is the revenue in 2002?\nAnswer: 567048.0\nQuestion: what about in 2001?\nAnswer: 395155.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "171893.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10968	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nchanges in the fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in citi 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loan interest depending on the balance sheet classifications of the credit products . the changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 27 million and a gain of $ 10 million , respectively . certain investments in unallocated precious metals citigroup invests in unallocated precious metals accounts ( gold , silver , platinum and palladium ) as part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities or to economically hedge certain exposures from issuing structured liabilities . under asc 815 , the investment is bifurcated into a debt host contract and a commodity forward derivative instrument . citigroup elects the fair value option for the debt host contract , and reports the debt host contract within trading account assets on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the total carrying amount of debt host contracts across unallocated precious metals accounts was approximately $ 0.4 billion and $ 0.9 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . the amounts are expected to fluctuate based on trading activity in future periods . as part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities , citi trades unallocated precious metals investments and executes forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts with trading counterparties . when citi sells an unallocated precious metals investment , citi 2019s receivable from its depository bank is repaid and citi derecognizes its investment in the unallocated precious metal . the forward purchase or sale contract with the trading counterparty indexed to unallocated precious metals is accounted for as a derivative , at fair value through earnings . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were approximately $ 13.7 billion and $ 10.3 billion in notional amounts of such forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts outstanding , respectively . certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method and other investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation . the company has elected the fair value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in citi 2019s investment companies , which are reported at fair value . the fair value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of these investments . all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value . these investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . citigroup also elected the fair value option for certain non-marketable equity securities whose risk is managed with derivative instruments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings . these securities are classified as trading account assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in the fair value of these securities and the related derivative instruments are recorded in principal transactions . effective january 1 , 2018 under asu 2016-01 and asu 2018-03 , a fair value option election is no longer required to measure these non-marketable equity securities through earnings . see note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for additional details . certain mortgage loans held-for-sale citigroup has elected the fair value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans hfs . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans hfs carried at fair value: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>december 312018</td><td>december 31 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet</td><td>$ 556</td><td>$ 426</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aggregate fair value in excess of ( less than ) unpaid principal balance</td><td>21</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> the changes in the fair values of these mortgage loans are reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . there was no net change in fair value during the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 due to instrument-specific credit risk . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue in the consolidated statement of income. .\nQuestion: what was the net change in carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet from 2017 to 2018?\nAnswer: 130.0\nQuestion: what was the 2018 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "426.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6464	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe pension plan investments are held in a master trust , with the northern trust company . investments in the master trust are valued at fair value , which has been determined based on fair value of the underlying investments of the master trust . investments in securities traded on public security exchanges are valued at their closing market prices on the valuation date ; where no sale was made on the valuation date , the security is generally valued at its most recent bid price . certain short-term investments are carried at cost , which approximates fair value . investments in registered investment companies and common trust funds , which primarily invest in stocks , bonds , and commodity futures , are valued using publicly available market prices for the underlying investments held by these entities . the majority of pension plan assets are invested in equity securities , because equity portfolios have historically provided higher returns than debt and other asset classes over extended time horizons , and are expected to do so in the future . correspondingly , equity investments also entail greater risks than other investments . equity risks are balanced by investing a significant portion of the plan 2019s assets in high quality debt securities . the average quality rating of the debt portfolio exceeded aa as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 . the debt portfolio is also broadly diversified and invested primarily in u.s . treasury , mortgage , and corporate securities with an intermediate average maturity . the weighted-average maturity of the debt portfolio was 5 years at both december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the investment of pension plan assets in securities issued by union pacific is specifically prohibited for both the equity and debt portfolios , other than through index fund holdings . other retirement programs thrift plan 2013 we provide a defined contribution plan ( thrift plan ) to eligible non-union employees and make matching contributions to the thrift plan . we match 50 cents for each dollar contributed by employees up to the first six percent of compensation contributed . our thrift plan contributions were $ 14 million in 2008 , $ 14 million in 2007 , and $ 13 million in 2006 . railroad retirement system 2013 all railroad employees are covered by the railroad retirement system ( the system ) . contributions made to the system are expensed as incurred and amounted to approximately $ 620 million in 2008 , $ 616 million in 2007 , and $ 615 million in 2006 . collective bargaining agreements 2013 under collective bargaining agreements , we provide certain postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits for eligible union employees . premiums under the plans are expensed as incurred and amounted to $ 49 million in 2008 and $ 40 million in both 2007 and 5 . other income other income included the following for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>rental income</td><td>$ 87</td><td>$ 68</td><td>$ 83</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net gain on non-operating asset dispositions</td><td>41</td><td>52</td><td>72</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>interest income</td><td>21</td><td>50</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>sale of receivables fees</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-operating environmental costs and other</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td><td>-33 ( 33 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 92</td><td>$ 116</td><td>$ 118</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the sum of average thrift plan contributions in 2007 and 2008?\nAnswer: 28.0\nQuestion: what was the value of thrift plan contributions in 2006?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "13.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10326	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nas of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , our liabilities associated with unrecognized tax benefits are not material . we and our subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and various foreign jurisdictions . with few exceptions , the statute of limitations is no longer open for u.s . federal or non-u.s . income tax examinations for the years before 2010 , other than with respect to refunds . u.s . income taxes and foreign withholding taxes have not been provided on earnings of $ 222 million , $ 211 million , and $ 193 million that have not been distributed by our non-u.s . companies as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 . our intention is to permanently reinvest these earnings , thereby indefinitely postponing their remittance to the u.s . if these earnings were remitted , we estimate that the additional income taxes after foreign tax credits would have been approximately $ 50 million in 2013 , $ 45 million in 2012 , and $ 41 million in 2011 . our federal and foreign income tax payments , net of refunds received , were $ 787 million in 2013 , $ 890 million in 2012 , and $ 722 million in 2011 . our 2013 net payments reflect a $ 550 million refund from the irs primarily attributable to our tax-deductible discretionary pension contributions during the fourth quarter of 2012 ; our 2012 net payments reflect a $ 153 million refund from the irs related to a 2011 capital loss carryback claim ; and our 2011 net payments reflect a $ 250 million refund from the irs related to estimated taxes paid for 2010 . as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , we had federal and foreign taxes receivable of $ 313 million and $ 662 million recorded within other current assets on our balance sheet , primarily attributable to our tax-deductible discretionary pension contributions in the fourth quarter of 2013 and 2012 and our debt exchange transaction in the fourth quarter of 2012 . note 9 2013 debt our long-term debt consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes with rates from 2.13% ( 2.13 % ) to 6.15% ( 6.15 % ) due 2016 to 2042</td><td>$ 5642</td><td>$ 5642</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>notes with rates from 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) to 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) due 2016 to 2036</td><td>916</td><td>930</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>notes with a rate of 7.38% ( 7.38 % ) due 2013</td><td>2014</td><td>150</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other debt</td><td>476</td><td>478</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total long-term debt</td><td>7034</td><td>7200</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>less : unamortized discounts</td><td>-882 ( 882 )</td><td>-892 ( 892 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total long-term debt net of unamortized discounts</td><td>6152</td><td>6308</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>less : current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>2014</td><td>-150 ( 150 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total long-term debt net</td><td>$ 6152</td><td>$ 6158</td></tr></table> in december 2012 , we issued notes totaling $ 1.3 billion with a fixed interest rate of 4.07% ( 4.07 % ) maturing in december 2042 ( the new notes ) in exchange for outstanding notes totaling $ 1.2 billion with interest rates ranging from 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) to 8.50% ( 8.50 % ) maturing in 2023 to 2040 ( the old notes ) . in connection with the exchange , we paid a premium of $ 393 million , of which $ 225 million was paid in cash and $ 168 million was in the form of new notes . this premium , in addition to $ 194 million in remaining unamortized discounts related to the old notes , will be amortized as additional interest expense over the term of the new notes using the effective interest method . we may , at our option , redeem some or all of the new notes at any time by paying the principal amount of notes being redeemed plus a make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest . interest on the new notes is payable on june 15 and december 15 of each year , beginning on june 15 , 2013 . the new notes are unsecured senior obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness . in september 2011 , we issued $ 2.0 billion of long-term notes in a registered public offering and in october 2011 , we used a portion of the proceeds to redeem all of our $ 500 million long-term notes maturing in 2013 . in 2011 , we repurchased $ 84 million of our long-term notes through open-market purchases . we paid premiums of $ 48 million in connection with the early extinguishments of debt , which were recognized in other non-operating income ( expense ) , net . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , we had in place with a group of banks a $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility that expires in august 2016 . we may request and the banks may grant , at their discretion , an increase to the credit facility by an additional amount up to $ 500 million . there were no borrowings outstanding under the credit facility through december 31 , 2013 . borrowings under the credit facility would be unsecured and bear interest at rates based , at our option , on a eurodollar rate or a base rate , as defined in the credit facility . each bank 2019s obligation to make loans under the credit facility is subject .\nQuestion: what was the total long term debt in 2013?\nAnswer: 6152.0\nQuestion: what was the total long term debt in 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "6308.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3815	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nat december 31 , 2013 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>$ 171</td><td>$ 133</td><td>$ 97</td><td>$ 74</td><td>$ 59</td><td>$ 162</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchase obligations ( a )</td><td>3170</td><td>770</td><td>642</td><td>529</td><td>453</td><td>2404</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3341</td><td>$ 903</td><td>$ 739</td><td>$ 603</td><td>$ 512</td><td>$ 2566</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes $ 3.3 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the company 2019s 2006 transformation plan forestland sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquisition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard , packaging and recycling business . rent expense was $ 215 million , $ 231 million and $ 205 million for 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . guarantees in connection with sales of businesses , property , equipment , forestlands and other assets , international paper commonly makes representations and warranties relating to such businesses or assets , and may agree to indemnify buyers with respect to tax and environmental liabilities , breaches of representations and warranties , and other matters . where liabilities for such matters are determined to be probable and subject to reasonable estimation , accrued liabilities are recorded at the time of sale as a cost of the transaction . environmental proceedings international paper has been named as a potentially responsible party in environmental remediation actions under various federal and state laws , including the comprehensive environmental response , compensation and liability act ( cercla ) . many of these proceedings involve the cleanup of hazardous substances at large commercial landfills that received waste from many different sources . while joint and several liability is authorized under cercla and equivalent state laws , as a practical matter , liability for cercla cleanups is typically allocated among the many potential responsible parties . remedial costs are recorded in the consolidated financial statements when they become probable and reasonably estimable . international paper has estimated the probable liability associated with these matters to be approximately $ 94 million in the aggregate at december 31 , 2013 . cass lake : one of the matters referenced above is a closed wood treating facility located in cass lake , minnesota . during 2009 , in connection with an environmental site remediation action under cercla , international paper submitted to the epa a site remediation feasibility study . in june 2011 , the epa selected and published a proposed soil remedy at the site with an estimated cost of $ 46 million . the overall remediation reserve for the site is currently $ 51 million to address this selection of an alternative for the soil remediation component of the overall site remedy . in october 2011 , the epa released a public statement indicating that the final soil remedy decision would be delayed . in the unlikely event that the epa changes its proposed soil remedy and approves instead a more expensive clean-up alternative , the remediation costs could be material , and significantly higher than amounts currently recorded . in october 2012 , the natural resource trustees for this site provided notice to international paper and other potentially responsible parties of their intent to perform a natural resource damage assessment . it is premature to predict the outcome of the assessment or to estimate a loss or range of loss , if any , which may be incurred . other : in addition to the above matters , other remediation costs typically associated with the cleanup of hazardous substances at the company 2019s current , closed or formerly-owned facilities , and recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet , totaled approximately $ 42 million at december 31 , 2013 . other than as described above , completion of required remedial actions is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements . kalamazoo river : the company is a potentially responsible party with respect to the allied paper , inc./ portage creek/kalamazoo river superfund site ( kalamazoo river superfund site ) in michigan . the epa asserts that the site is contaminated primarily by pcbs as a result of discharges from various paper mills located along the kalamazoo river , including a paper mill formerly owned by st . regis paper company ( st . regis ) . the company is a successor in interest to st . regis . the company has not received any orders from the epa with respect to the site and continues to collect information from the epa and other parties relative to the site to evaluate the extent of its liability , if any , with respect to the site . accordingly , it is premature to estimate a loss or range of loss with respect to this site . also in connection with the kalamazoo river superfund site , the company was named as a defendant by georgia-pacific consumer products lp , fort james corporation and georgia pacific llc in a contribution and cost recovery action for alleged pollution at the site . the suit seeks contribution under cercla for $ 79 million in costs purportedly expended by plaintiffs as of the filing of the complaint and for future remediation costs . the suit alleges that a mill , during the time it was allegedly owned and operated by st . regis , discharged pcb contaminated solids and paper residuals resulting from paper de-inking and recycling . also named as defendants in the suit are ncr corporation and weyerhaeuser company . in mid-2011 , the suit was transferred from the district court for the eastern district of wisconsin to the district court for the western .\nQuestion: what was rent expense in 2013?\nAnswer: 215.0\nQuestion: what was is in 2012?\nAnswer: 231.0\nQuestion: what is the sum?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "446.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5661	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) operating income increased during 2017 when compared to 2016 , comprised of a decrease in revenue of $ 42.1 , as discussed above , a decrease in salaries and related expenses of $ 28.0 and a decrease in office and general expenses of $ 16.9 . the decrease in salaries and related expenses was primarily due to lower discretionary bonuses and incentive expense as well as a decrease in base salaries , benefits and tax . the decrease in office and general expenses was primarily due to decreases in adjustments to contingent acquisition obligations , as compared to the prior year . operating income increased during 2016 when compared to 2015 due to an increase in revenue of $ 58.8 , as discussed above , and a decrease in office and general expenses of $ 3.7 , partially offset by an increase in salaries and related expenses of $ 38.8 . the increase in salaries and related expenses was attributable to an increase in base salaries , benefits and tax primarily due to increases in our workforce to support business growth over the last twelve months . the decrease in office and general expenses was primarily due to lower production expenses related to pass-through costs , which are also reflected in revenue , for certain projects in which we acted as principal that decreased in size or did not recur during the current year . corporate and other certain corporate and other charges are reported as a separate line item within total segment operating income and include corporate office expenses , as well as shared service center and certain other centrally managed expenses that are not fully allocated to operating divisions . salaries and related expenses include salaries , long-term incentives , annual bonuses and other miscellaneous benefits for corporate office employees . office and general expenses primarily include professional fees related to internal control compliance , financial statement audits and legal , information technology and other consulting services that are engaged and managed through the corporate office . office and general expenses also include rental expense and depreciation of leasehold improvements for properties occupied by corporate office employees . a portion of centrally managed expenses are allocated to operating divisions based on a formula that uses the planned revenues of each of the operating units . amounts allocated also include specific charges for information technology-related projects , which are allocated based on utilization . corporate and other expenses decreased during 2017 by $ 20.6 to $ 126.6 compared to 2016 , primarily due to lower annual incentive expense . corporate and other expenses increased during 2016 by $ 5.4 to $ 147.2 compared to 2015 . liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flow data</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income adjusted to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities1</td><td>$ 887.3</td><td>$ 1023.2</td><td>$ 848.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used in working capital2</td><td>-29.9 ( 29.9 )</td><td>-414.9 ( 414.9 )</td><td>-99.9 ( 99.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>changes in other non-current assets and liabilities</td><td>24.4</td><td>-95.5 ( 95.5 )</td><td>-60.4 ( 60.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 881.8</td><td>$ 512.8</td><td>$ 688.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-196.2 ( 196.2 )</td><td>-263.9 ( 263.9 )</td><td>-199.7 ( 199.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net cash used in financing activities</td><td>-1004.9 ( 1004.9 )</td><td>-666.4 ( 666.4 )</td><td>-490.9 ( 490.9 )</td></tr></table> 1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , net losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes . 2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . operating activities due to the seasonality of our business , we typically use cash from working capital in the first nine months of a year , with the largest impact in the first quarter , and generate cash from working capital in the fourth quarter , driven by the seasonally strong media spending by our clients . quarterly and annual working capital results are impacted by the fluctuating annual media spending budgets of our clients as well as their changing media spending patterns throughout each year across various countries. .\nQuestion: what was the total of corporate and other expenses in 2015?\nAnswer: 141.8\nQuestion: and what was it in 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "147.2" } ]
CONVFINQA738	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis investing & lending investing & lending includes our investing activities and the origination of loans , including our relationship lending activities , to provide financing to clients . these investments and loans are typically longer-term in nature . we make investments , some of which are consolidated , including through our merchant banking business and our special situations group , in debt securities and loans , public and private equity securities , infrastructure and real estate entities . some of these investments are made indirectly through funds that we manage . we also make unsecured and secured loans to retail clients through our digital platforms , marcus and goldman sachs private bank select ( gs select ) , respectively . the table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>year ended december 2017</td><td>year ended december 2016</td><td>year ended december 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity securities</td><td>$ 4578</td><td>$ 2573</td><td>$ 3781</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt securities and loans</td><td>2003</td><td>1507</td><td>1655</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total net revenues</td><td>6581</td><td>4080</td><td>5436</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating expenses</td><td>2796</td><td>2386</td><td>2402</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pre-taxearnings</td><td>$ 3785</td><td>$ 1694</td><td>$ 3034</td></tr></table> operating environment . during 2017 , generally higher global equity prices and tighter credit spreads contributed to a favorable environment for our equity and debt investments . results also reflected net gains from company- specific events , including sales , and corporate performance . this environment contrasts with 2016 , where , in the first quarter of 2016 , market conditions were difficult and corporate performance , particularly in the energy sector , was impacted by a challenging macroeconomic environment . however , market conditions improved during the rest of 2016 as macroeconomic concerns moderated . if macroeconomic concerns negatively affect company-specific events or corporate performance , or if global equity markets decline or credit spreads widen , net revenues in investing & lending would likely be negatively impacted . 2017 versus 2016 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 6.58 billion for 2017 , 61% ( 61 % ) higher than 2016 . net revenues in equity securities were $ 4.58 billion , including $ 3.82 billion of net gains from private equities and $ 762 million in net gains from public equities . net revenues in equity securities were 78% ( 78 % ) higher than 2016 , primarily reflecting a significant increase in net gains from private equities , which were positively impacted by company- specific events and corporate performance . in addition , net gains from public equities were significantly higher , as global equity prices increased during the year . of the $ 4.58 billion of net revenues in equity securities , approximately 60% ( 60 % ) was driven by net gains from company-specific events , such as sales , and public equities . net revenues in debt securities and loans were $ 2.00 billion , 33% ( 33 % ) higher than 2016 , reflecting significantly higher net interest income ( 2017 included approximately $ 1.80 billion of net interest income ) . net revenues in debt securities and loans for 2017 also included an impairment of approximately $ 130 million on a secured operating expenses were $ 2.80 billion for 2017 , 17% ( 17 % ) higher than 2016 , due to increased compensation and benefits expenses , reflecting higher net revenues , increased expenses related to consolidated investments , and increased expenses related to marcus . pre-tax earnings were $ 3.79 billion in 2017 compared with $ 1.69 billion in 2016 . 2016 versus 2015 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 4.08 billion for 2016 , 25% ( 25 % ) lower than 2015 . net revenues in equity securities were $ 2.57 billion , including $ 2.17 billion of net gains from private equities and $ 402 million in net gains from public equities . net revenues in equity securities were 32% ( 32 % ) lower than 2015 , primarily reflecting a significant decrease in net gains from private equities , driven by company-specific events and corporate performance . net revenues in debt securities and loans were $ 1.51 billion , 9% ( 9 % ) lower than 2015 , reflecting significantly lower net revenues related to relationship lending activities , due to the impact of changes in credit spreads on economic hedges . losses related to these hedges were $ 596 million in 2016 , compared with gains of $ 329 million in 2015 . this decrease was partially offset by higher net gains from investments in debt instruments and higher net interest income . see note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about economic hedges related to our relationship lending activities . operating expenses were $ 2.39 billion for 2016 , essentially unchanged compared with 2015 . pre-tax earnings were $ 1.69 billion in 2016 , 44% ( 44 % ) lower than 2015 . goldman sachs 2017 form 10-k 61 .\nQuestion: in 2017, what were the net revenues in equity securities when including net gains from private equities?\nAnswer: 8.4\nQuestion: in 2016, what percentage of total net revenue in the investing and lending segment was from equity securities?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.63064" } ]
CONVFINQA8950	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents adobe inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) goodwill , purchased intangibles and other long-lived assets goodwill is assigned to one or more reporting segments on the date of acquisition . we review our goodwill for impairment annually during our second quarter of each fiscal year and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of any one of our reporting units below its respective carrying amount . in performing our goodwill impairment test , we first perform a qualitative assessment , which requires that we consider events or circumstances including macroeconomic conditions , industry and market considerations , cost factors , overall financial performance , changes in management or key personnel , changes in strategy , changes in customers , changes in the composition or carrying amount of a reporting segment 2019s net assets and changes in our stock price . if , after assessing the totality of events or circumstances , we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair values of our reporting segments are greater than the carrying amounts , then the quantitative goodwill impairment test is not performed . if the qualitative assessment indicates that the quantitative analysis should be performed , we then evaluate goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair value of each of our reporting segments to its carrying value , including the associated goodwill . to determine the fair values , we use the equal weighting of the market approach based on comparable publicly traded companies in similar lines of businesses and the income approach based on estimated discounted future cash flows . our cash flow assumptions consider historical and forecasted revenue , operating costs and other relevant factors . we completed our annual goodwill impairment test in the second quarter of fiscal 2018 . we determined , after performing a qualitative review of each reporting segment , that it is more likely than not that the fair value of each of our reporting segments substantially exceeds the respective carrying amounts . accordingly , there was no indication of impairment and the quantitative goodwill impairment test was not performed . we did not identify any events or changes in circumstances since the performance of our annual goodwill impairment test that would require us to perform another goodwill impairment test during the fiscal year . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on any excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2018 , 2017 or 2016 . during fiscal 2018 , our intangible assets were amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from 1 to 14 years . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed or on a straight-line basis when the consumption pattern is not apparent . the weighted average useful lives of our intangible assets were as follows : weighted average useful life ( years ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>weighted averageuseful life ( years )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>purchased technology</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>customer contracts and relationships</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trademarks</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>acquired rights to use technology</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>backlog</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangibles</td><td>4</td></tr></table> income taxes we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes . under this method , income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year . in addition , deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards . we record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount for which realization is more likely than not. .\nQuestion: what was the weighted average useful life for purchased technology, in years?\nAnswer: 6.0\nQuestion: and what was it for customer contracts and relationships, also in years?\nAnswer: 9.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the total of years in weighted average useful life for both of those intangible assets?\nAnswer: 15.0\nQuestion: and what is the average between them?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "7.5" } ]
CONVFINQA3316	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ninvestment tax credits have been deferred by the regulated utility subsidiaries and are being amortized to income over the average estimated service lives of the related assets . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions as a component of income tax expense and accounts for sales tax collected from customers and remitted to taxing authorities on a net basis . see note 14 2014income taxes for additional information . allowance for funds used during construction afudc is a non-cash credit to income with a corresponding charge to utility plant that represents the cost of borrowed funds or a return on equity funds devoted to plant under construction . the regulated utility subsidiaries record afudc to the extent permitted by the pucs . the portion of afudc attributable to borrowed funds is shown as a reduction of interest , net on the consolidated statements of operations . any portion of afudc attributable to equity funds would be included in other , net on the consolidated statements of operations . afudc is provided in the following table for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>allowance for other funds used during construction</td><td>$ 24</td><td>$ 19</td><td>$ 15</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>allowance for borrowed funds used during construction</td><td>13</td><td>8</td><td>6</td></tr></table> environmental costs the company 2019s water and wastewater operations and the operations of its market-based businesses are subject to u.s . federal , state , local and foreign requirements relating to environmental protection , and as such , the company periodically becomes subject to environmental claims in the normal course of business . environmental expenditures that relate to current operations or provide a future benefit are expensed or capitalized as appropriate . remediation costs that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations are accrued , on an undiscounted basis , when it is probable that these costs will be incurred and can be reasonably estimated . a conservation agreement entered into by a subsidiary of the company with the national oceanic and atmospheric administration in 2010 and amended in 2017 required the subsidiary to , among other provisions , implement certain measures to protect the steelhead trout and its habitat in the carmel river watershed in the state of california . the subsidiary agreed to pay $ 1 million annually commencing in 2010 with the final payment being made in 2021 . remediation costs accrued amounted to $ 4 million and $ 6 million as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . derivative financial instruments the company uses derivative financial instruments for purposes of hedging exposures to fluctuations in interest rates . these derivative contracts are entered into for periods consistent with the related underlying exposures and do not constitute positions independent of those exposures . the company does not enter into derivative contracts for speculative purposes and does not use leveraged instruments . all derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value . on the date the derivative contract is entered into , the company may designate the derivative as a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability ( fair-value hedge ) or a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability ( cash-flow hedge ) . changes in the fair value of a fair-value hedge , along with the gain or loss on the underlying hedged item , are recorded in current-period earnings . the gains and losses on the effective portion of cash-flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income , until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows . any ineffective portion of designated cash-flow hedges is recognized in current-period earnings. .\nQuestion: what was the allowance for other funds used during construction in 2018?\nAnswer: 24.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "15.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3028	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe diluted earnings per share calculation excludes stock options , sars , restricted stock and units and performance units and stock that were anti-dilutive . shares underlying the excluded stock options and sars totaled 2.6 million , 10.3 million and 10.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . for the year ended december 31 , 2016 , 4.5 million shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units and performance units and performance stock were excluded . 10 . supplemental cash flow information net cash paid for interest and income taxes was as follows for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest net of capitalized interest</td><td>$ 275305</td><td>$ 252030</td><td>$ 222088</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income taxes net of refunds received</td><td>$ 188946</td><td>$ -39293 ( 39293 )</td><td>$ 41108</td></tr></table> eog's accrued capital expenditures at december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 were $ 475 million , $ 388 million and $ 416 million , respectively . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2017 included non-cash additions of $ 282 million to eog's oil and gas properties as a result of property exchanges . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2016 included $ 3834 million in non-cash additions to eog's oil and gas properties related to the yates transaction ( see note 17 ) . 11 . business segment information eog's operations are all crude oil and natural gas exploration and production related . the segment reporting topic of the asc establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments in annual financial statements . operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker , or decision-making group , in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance . eog's chief operating decision-making process is informal and involves the chairman of the board and chief executive officer and other key officers . this group routinely reviews and makes operating decisions related to significant issues associated with each of eog's major producing areas in the united states , trinidad , the united kingdom and china . for segment reporting purposes , the chief operating decision maker considers the major united states producing areas to be one operating segment. .\nQuestion: what are eog's accrued capital expenditures in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "475.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2622	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n82 \| 2017 form 10-k a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions , including positions impacting only the timing of tax benefits , follows . reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits:1 years a0ended a0december a031 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions of dollars )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1,</td><td>$ 1032</td><td>$ 968</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions for tax positions related to current year</td><td>270</td><td>73</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions related to prior years</td><td>20</td><td>55</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions related to prior years</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td><td>-36 ( 36 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reductions for settlements2</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions for expiration of statute of limitations</td><td>2014</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>balance at december 31,</td><td>$ 1286</td><td>$ 1032</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount that if recognized would impact the effective tax rate</td><td>$ 1209</td><td>$ 963</td></tr></table> 1 foreign currency impacts are included within each line as applicable . 2 includes cash payment or other reduction of assets to settle liability . we classify interest and penalties on income taxes as a component of the provision for income taxes . we recognized a net provision for interest and penalties of $ 38 million , $ 34 million and $ 20 million during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the total amount of interest and penalties accrued was $ 157 million and $ 120 million as of december a031 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . on january 31 , 2018 , we received a revenue agent 2019s report from the irs indicating the end of the field examination of our u.s . income tax returns for 2010 to 2012 . in the audits of 2007 to 2012 including the impact of a loss carryback to 2005 , the irs has proposed to tax in the united states profits earned from certain parts transactions by csarl , based on the irs examination team 2019s application of the 201csubstance-over-form 201d or 201cassignment-of-income 201d judicial doctrines . we are vigorously contesting the proposed increases to tax and penalties for these years of approximately $ 2.3 billion . we believe that the relevant transactions complied with applicable tax laws and did not violate judicial doctrines . we have filed u.s . income tax returns on this same basis for years after 2012 . based on the information currently available , we do not anticipate a significant increase or decrease to our unrecognized tax benefits for this matter within the next 12 months . we currently believe the ultimate disposition of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position , liquidity or results of operations . with the exception of a loss carryback to 2005 , tax years prior to 2007 are generally no longer subject to u.s . tax assessment . in our major non-u.s . jurisdictions including australia , brazil , china , germany , japan , mexico , switzerland , singapore and the u.k. , tax years are typically subject to examination for three to ten years . due to the uncertainty related to the timing and potential outcome of audits , we cannot estimate the range of reasonably possible change in unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months. .\nQuestion: what was the net difference in the provision for interest and penalties from 2015 to 2016?\nAnswer: 14.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "20.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5475	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy entergy new orleans provides electric and gas service in the city of new orleans pursuant to indeterminate permits set forth in city ordinances ( except electric service in algiers , which is provided by entergy louisiana ) . these ordinances contain a continuing option for the city of new orleans to purchase entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas utility properties . entergy texas holds a certificate of convenience and necessity from the puct to provide electric service to areas within approximately 27 counties in eastern texas , and holds non-exclusive franchises to provide electric service in approximately 68 incorporated municipalities . entergy texas was typically granted 50-year franchises , but recently has been receiving 25-year franchises . entergy texas 2019s electric franchises expire during 2013-2058 . the business of system energy is limited to wholesale power sales . it has no distribution franchises . property and other generation resources generating stations the total capability of the generating stations owned and leased by the utility operating companies and system energy as of december 31 , 2011 , is indicated below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company</td><td>owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) total</td><td>owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) gas/oil</td><td>owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) nuclear</td><td>owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) coal</td><td>owned and leased capability mw ( 1 ) hydro</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>entergy arkansas</td><td>4774</td><td>1668</td><td>1823</td><td>1209</td><td>74</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>entergy gulf states louisiana</td><td>3317</td><td>1980</td><td>974</td><td>363</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>entergy louisiana</td><td>5424</td><td>4265</td><td>1159</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>entergy mississippi</td><td>3229</td><td>2809</td><td>-</td><td>420</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>entergy new orleans</td><td>764</td><td>764</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>entergy texas</td><td>2538</td><td>2269</td><td>-</td><td>269</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>system energy</td><td>1071</td><td>-</td><td>1071</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total</td><td>21117</td><td>13755</td><td>5027</td><td>2261</td><td>74</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) 201cowned and leased capability 201d is the dependable load carrying capability as demonstrated under actual operating conditions based on the primary fuel ( assuming no curtailments ) that each station was designed to utilize . the entergy system's load and capacity projections are reviewed periodically to assess the need and timing for additional generating capacity and interconnections . these reviews consider existing and projected demand , the availability and price of power , the location of new load , and the economy . summer peak load in the entergy system service territory has averaged 21246 mw from 2002-2011 . in the 2002 time period , the entergy system's long-term capacity resources , allowing for an adequate reserve margin , were approximately 3000 mw less than the total capacity required for peak period demands . in this time period the entergy system met its capacity shortages almost entirely through short-term power purchases in the wholesale spot market . in the fall of 2002 , the entergy system began a program to add new resources to its existing generation portfolio and began a process of issuing requests for proposals ( rfp ) to procure supply-side resources from sources other than the spot market to meet the unique regional needs of the utility operating companies . the entergy system has adopted a long-term resource strategy that calls for the bulk of capacity needs to be met through long-term resources , whether owned or contracted . entergy refers to this strategy as the \"portfolio transformation strategy\" . over the past nine years , portfolio transformation has resulted in the addition of about 4500 mw of new long-term resources . these figures do not include transactions currently pending as a result of the summer 2009 rfp . when the summer 2009 rfp transactions are included in the entergy system portfolio of long-term resources and adjusting for unit deactivations of older generation , the entergy system is approximately 500 mw short of its projected 2012 peak load plus reserve margin . this remaining need is expected to be met through a nuclear uprate at grand gulf and limited-term resources . the entergy system will continue to access the spot power market to economically .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2011 what was the amount from total capabilities that was generated from coal stations for entergy arkansas?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1209.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1584	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis sensitivity measures certain portfolios and individual positions are not included in var because var is not the most appropriate risk measure . other sensitivity measures we use to analyze market risk are described below . 10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity measures . the table below presents market risk for inventory positions that are not included in var . the market risk of these positions is determined by estimating the potential reduction in net revenues of a 10% ( 10 % ) decline in the underlying asset value . equity positions below relate to private and restricted public equity securities , including interests in funds that invest in corporate equities and real estate and interests in hedge funds , which are included in 201cfinancial instruments owned , at fair value . 201d debt positions include interests in funds that invest in corporate mezzanine and senior debt instruments , loans backed by commercial and residential real estate , corporate bank loans and other corporate debt , including acquired portfolios of distressed loans . these debt positions are included in 201cfinancial instruments owned , at fair value . 201d see note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about cash instruments . these measures do not reflect diversification benefits across asset categories or across other market risk measures . asset categories 10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity amount as of december in millions 2013 2012 equity 1 $ 2256 $ 2471 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>asset categories</td><td>asset categories</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity1</td><td>$ 2256</td><td>$ 2471</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt</td><td>1522</td><td>1676</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3778</td><td>$ 4147</td></tr></table> 1 . december 2012 includes $ 208 million related to our investment in the ordinary shares of icbc , which was sold in the first half of 2013 . credit spread sensitivity on derivatives and borrowings . var excludes the impact of changes in counterparty and our own credit spreads on derivatives as well as changes in our own credit spreads on unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected . the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in credit spreads ( counterparty and our own ) on derivatives was a gain of $ 4 million and $ 3 million ( including hedges ) as of december 2013 and december 2012 , respectively . in addition , the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in our own credit spreads on unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected was a gain of $ 8 million and $ 7 million ( including hedges ) as of december 2013 and december 2012 , respectively . however , the actual net impact of a change in our own credit spreads is also affected by the liquidity , duration and convexity ( as the sensitivity is not linear to changes in yields ) of those unsecured borrowings for which the fair value option was elected , as well as the relative performance of any hedges undertaken . interest rate sensitivity . as of december 2013 and december 2012 , the firm had $ 14.90 billion and $ 6.50 billion , respectively , of loans held for investment which were accounted for at amortized cost and included in 201creceivables from customers and counterparties , 201d substantially all of which had floating interest rates . as of december 2013 and december 2012 , the estimated sensitivity to a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on such loans was $ 136 million and $ 62 million , respectively , of additional interest income over a 12-month period , which does not take into account the potential impact of an increase in costs to fund such loans . see note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about loans held for investment . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 95 .\nQuestion: as of december 2013, what was the value of the total 10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity amount that was equity related?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2256.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7195	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis the risk committee of the board and the risk governance committee ( through delegated authority from the firmwide risk committee ) approve market risk limits and sub-limits at firmwide , business and product levels , consistent with our risk appetite statement . in addition , market risk management ( through delegated authority from the risk governance committee ) sets market risk limits and sub-limits at certain product and desk levels . the purpose of the firmwide limits is to assist senior management in controlling our overall risk profile . sub-limits are set below the approved level of risk limits . sub-limits set the desired maximum amount of exposure that may be managed by any particular business on a day-to-day basis without additional levels of senior management approval , effectively leaving day-to-day decisions to individual desk managers and traders . accordingly , sub-limits are a management tool designed to ensure appropriate escalation rather than to establish maximum risk tolerance . sub-limits also distribute risk among various businesses in a manner that is consistent with their level of activity and client demand , taking into account the relative performance of each area . our market risk limits are monitored daily by market risk management , which is responsible for identifying and escalating , on a timely basis , instances where limits have been exceeded . when a risk limit has been exceeded ( e.g. , due to positional changes or changes in market conditions , such as increased volatilities or changes in correlations ) , it is escalated to senior managers in market risk management and/or the appropriate risk committee . such instances are remediated by an inventory reduction and/or a temporary or permanent increase to the risk limit . model review and validation our var and stress testing models are regularly reviewed by market risk management and enhanced in order to incorporate changes in the composition of positions included in our market risk measures , as well as variations in market conditions . prior to implementing significant changes to our assumptions and/or models , model risk management performs model validations . significant changes to our var and stress testing models are reviewed with our chief risk officer and chief financial officer , and approved by the firmwide risk committee . see 201cmodel risk management 201d for further information about the review and validation of these models . systems we have made a significant investment in technology to monitor market risk including : 2030 an independent calculation of var and stress measures ; 2030 risk measures calculated at individual position levels ; 2030 attribution of risk measures to individual risk factors of each position ; 2030 the ability to report many different views of the risk measures ( e.g. , by desk , business , product type or entity ) ; 2030 the ability to produce ad hoc analyses in a timely manner . metrics we analyze var at the firmwide level and a variety of more detailed levels , including by risk category , business , and region . the tables below present average daily var and period-end var , as well as the high and low var for the period . diversification effect in the tables below represents the difference between total var and the sum of the vars for the four risk categories . this effect arises because the four market risk categories are not perfectly correlated . the table below presents average daily var by risk category. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>year ended december 2017</td><td>year ended december 2016</td><td>year ended december 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rates</td><td>$ 40</td><td>$ 45</td><td>$ 47</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity prices</td><td>24</td><td>25</td><td>26</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>currency rates</td><td>12</td><td>21</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>commodity prices</td><td>13</td><td>17</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>diversification effect</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>-45 ( 45 )</td><td>-47 ( 47 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 54</td><td>$ 63</td><td>$ 76</td></tr></table> our average daily var decreased to $ 54 million in 2017 from $ 63 million in 2016 , due to reductions across all risk categories , partially offset by a decrease in the diversification effect . the overall decrease was primarily due to lower levels of volatility . our average daily var decreased to $ 63 million in 2016 from $ 76 million in 2015 , due to reductions across all risk categories , partially offset by a decrease in the diversification effect . the overall decrease was primarily due to reduced exposures . goldman sachs 2017 form 10-k 91 .\nQuestion: what was the average daily var in the currency rates risk category in 2017?\nAnswer: 12.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2016?\nAnswer: 21.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-9.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6416	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nzimmer holdings , inc . 2013 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges , unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities and amortization of prior service costs and unrecognized gains and losses in actuarial assumptions . treasury stock 2013 we account for repurchases of common stock under the cost method and present treasury stock as a reduction of stockholders 2019 equity . we reissue common stock held in treasury only for limited purposes . noncontrolling interest 2013 in 2011 , we made an investment in a company in which we acquired a controlling financial interest , but not 100 percent of the equity . in 2013 , we purchased additional shares of the company from the minority shareholders . further information related to the noncontrolling interests of that investment has not been provided as it is not significant to our consolidated financial statements . accounting pronouncements 2013 effective january 1 , 2013 , we adopted the fasb 2019s accounting standard updates ( asus ) requiring reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income ( oci ) and balance sheet offsetting between derivative assets and liabilities . these asus only change financial statement disclosure requirements and therefore do not impact our financial position , results of operations or cash flows . see note 12 for disclosures relating to oci . see note 13 for disclosures relating to balance sheet offsetting . there are no other recently issued accounting pronouncements that we have not yet adopted that are expected to have a material effect on our financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 3 . share-based compensation our share-based payments primarily consist of stock options , restricted stock , restricted stock units ( rsus ) , and an employee stock purchase plan . share-based compensation expense is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>for the years ended december 31,</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>stock options</td><td>$ 24.7</td><td>$ 32.4</td><td>$ 41.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>rsus and other</td><td>23.8</td><td>22.6</td><td>18.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total expense pre-tax</td><td>48.5</td><td>55.0</td><td>60.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>tax benefit related to awards</td><td>-15.6 ( 15.6 )</td><td>-16.6 ( 16.6 )</td><td>-17.8 ( 17.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total expense net of tax</td><td>$ 32.9</td><td>$ 38.4</td><td>$ 42.7</td></tr></table> share-based compensation cost capitalized as part of inventory for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 4.1 million , $ 6.1 million , and $ 8.8 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , approximately $ 2.4 million and $ 3.3 million of capitalized costs remained in finished goods inventory . stock options we had two equity compensation plans in effect at december 31 , 2013 : the 2009 stock incentive plan ( 2009 plan ) and the stock plan for non-employee directors . the 2009 plan succeeded the 2006 stock incentive plan ( 2006 plan ) and the teamshare stock option plan ( teamshare plan ) . no further awards have been granted under the 2006 plan or under the teamshare plan since may 2009 , and shares remaining available for grant under those plans have been merged into the 2009 plan . vested and unvested stock options and unvested restricted stock and rsus previously granted under the 2006 plan , the teamshare plan and another prior plan , the 2001 stock incentive plan , remained outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 . we have reserved the maximum number of shares of common stock available for award under the terms of each of these plans . we have registered 57.9 million shares of common stock under these plans . the 2009 plan provides for the grant of nonqualified stock options and incentive stock options , long-term performance awards in the form of performance shares or units , restricted stock , rsus and stock appreciation rights . the compensation and management development committee of the board of directors determines the grant date for annual grants under our equity compensation plans . the date for annual grants under the 2009 plan to our executive officers is expected to occur in the first quarter of each year following the earnings announcements for the previous quarter and full year . the stock plan for non-employee directors provides for awards of stock options , restricted stock and rsus to non-employee directors . it has been our practice to issue shares of common stock upon exercise of stock options from previously unissued shares , except in limited circumstances where they are issued from treasury stock . the total number of awards which may be granted in a given year and/or over the life of the plan under each of our equity compensation plans is limited . at december 31 , 2013 , an aggregate of 10.4 million shares were available for future grants and awards under these plans . stock options granted to date under our plans generally vest over four years and generally have a maximum contractual life of 10 years . as established under our equity compensation plans , vesting may accelerate upon retirement after the first anniversary date of the award if certain criteria are met . we recognize expense related to stock options on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period , less awards expected to be forfeited using estimated forfeiture rates . due to the accelerated retirement provisions , the requisite service period of our stock options range from one to four years . stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant , except in limited circumstances where local law may dictate otherwise. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the share-based compensation expense from 2011 to 2012?\nAnswer: -4.3\nQuestion: and what was this change as a percent of that expense in 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.1007" } ]
CONVFINQA9812	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\non the credit rating of the company and a $ 200 million term loan with an interest rate of libor plus a margin of 175 basis points , both with maturity dates in 2017 . the proceeds from these borrowings were used , along with available cash , to fund the acquisition of temple- inland . during 2012 , international paper fully repaid the $ 1.2 billion term loan . international paper utilizes interest rate swaps to change the mix of fixed and variable rate debt and manage interest expense . at december 31 , 2012 , international paper had interest rate swaps with a total notional amount of $ 150 million and maturities in 2013 ( see note 14 derivatives and hedging activities on pages 70 through 74 of item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data ) . during 2012 , existing swaps and the amortization of deferred gains on previously terminated swaps decreased the weighted average cost of debt from 6.8% ( 6.8 % ) to an effective rate of 6.6% ( 6.6 % ) . the inclusion of the offsetting interest income from short- term investments reduced this effective rate to 6.2% ( 6.2 % ) . other financing activities during 2012 included the issuance of approximately 1.9 million shares of treasury stock , net of restricted stock withholding , and 1.0 million shares of common stock for various incentive plans , including stock options exercises that generated approximately $ 108 million of cash . payment of restricted stock withholding taxes totaled $ 35 million . off-balance sheet variable interest entities information concerning off-balance sheet variable interest entities is set forth in note 12 variable interest entities and preferred securities of subsidiaries on pages 67 through 69 of item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data for discussion . liquidity and capital resources outlook for 2015 capital expenditures and long-term debt international paper expects to be able to meet projected capital expenditures , service existing debt and meet working capital and dividend requirements during 2015 through current cash balances and cash from operations . additionally , the company has existing credit facilities totaling $ 2.0 billion of which nothing has been used . the company was in compliance with all its debt covenants at december 31 , 2014 . the company 2019s financial covenants require the maintenance of a minimum net worth of $ 9 billion and a total debt-to- capital ratio of less than 60% ( 60 % ) . net worth is defined as the sum of common stock , paid-in capital and retained earnings , less treasury stock plus any cumulative goodwill impairment charges . the calculation also excludes accumulated other comprehensive income/ loss and nonrecourse financial liabilities of special purpose entities . the total debt-to-capital ratio is defined as total debt divided by the sum of total debt plus net worth . at december 31 , 2014 , international paper 2019s net worth was $ 14.0 billion , and the total-debt- to-capital ratio was 40% ( 40 % ) . the company will continue to rely upon debt and capital markets for the majority of any necessary long-term funding not provided by operating cash flows . funding decisions will be guided by our capital structure planning objectives . the primary goals of the company 2019s capital structure planning are to maximize financial flexibility and preserve liquidity while reducing interest expense . the majority of international paper 2019s debt is accessed through global public capital markets where we have a wide base of investors . maintaining an investment grade credit rating is an important element of international paper 2019s financing strategy . at december 31 , 2014 , the company held long-term credit ratings of bbb ( stable outlook ) and baa2 ( stable outlook ) by s&p and moody 2019s , respectively . contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2014 , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>maturities of long-term debt ( a )</td><td>$ 742</td><td>$ 543</td><td>$ 71</td><td>$ 1229</td><td>$ 605</td><td>$ 6184</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt obligations with right of offset ( b )</td><td>2014</td><td>5202</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>142</td><td>106</td><td>84</td><td>63</td><td>45</td><td>91</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>purchase obligations ( c )</td><td>3266</td><td>761</td><td>583</td><td>463</td><td>422</td><td>1690</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total ( d )</td><td>$ 4150</td><td>$ 6612</td><td>$ 738</td><td>$ 1755</td><td>$ 1072</td><td>$ 7965</td></tr></table> ( a ) total debt includes scheduled principal payments only . ( b ) represents debt obligations borrowed from non-consolidated variable interest entities for which international paper has , and intends to effect , a legal right to offset these obligations with investments held in the entities . accordingly , in its consolidated balance sheet at december 31 , 2014 , international paper has offset approximately $ 5.2 billion of interests in the entities against this $ 5.3 billion of debt obligations held by the entities ( see note 12 variable interest entities and preferred securities of subsidiaries on pages 67 through 69 in item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data ) . ( c ) includes $ 2.3 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the 2006 transformation plan forestland sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquisition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard , packaging and recycling business . ( d ) not included in the above table due to the uncertainty as to the amount and timing of the payment are unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $ 119 million . as discussed in note 12 variable interest entities and preferred securities of subsidiaries on pages 67 through 69 in item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data , in connection with the 2006 international paper installment sale of forestlands , we received $ 4.8 billion of installment notes ( or timber notes ) , which we contributed to certain non- consolidated borrower entities . the installment notes mature in august 2016 ( unless extended ) . the deferred .\nQuestion: what portion of total obligations due in 2015 is related to purchase obligations?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.78699" } ]
CONVFINQA10668	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe target awards for the other named executive officers were set as follows : joseph f . domino , ceo - entergy texas ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) ; hugh t . mcdonald , ceo - entergy arkansas ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) ; haley fisackerly , ceo - entergy mississippi ( 40% ( 40 % ) ) ; william m . mohl ( 60% ( 60 % ) ) , ceo - entergy gulf states and entergy louisiana ; charles l . rice , jr . ( 40% ( 40 % ) ) , ceo - entergy new orleans and theodore h . bunting , jr . - principal accounting officer - the subsidiaries ( 60% ( 60 % ) ) . the target awards for the named executive officers ( other than entergy named executive officers ) were set by their respective supervisors ( subject to ultimate approval of entergy 2019s chief executive officer ) who allocated a potential incentive pool established by the personnel committee among various of their direct and indirect reports . in setting the target awards , the supervisor took into account considerations similar to those used by the personnel committee in setting the target awards for entergy 2019s named executive officers . target awards are set based on an executive officer 2019s current position and executive management level within the entergy organization . executive management levels at entergy range from level 1 thorough level 4 . mr . denault and mr . taylor hold positions in level 2 whereas mr . bunting and mr . mohl hold positions in level 3 and mr . domino , mr . fisackerly , mr . mcdonald and mr . rice hold positions in level 4 . accordingly , their respective incentive targets differ one from another based on the external market data developed by the committee 2019s independent compensation consultant and the other factors noted above . in december 2010 , the committee determined the executive incentive plan targets to be used for purposes of establishing annual bonuses for 2011 . the committee 2019s determination of the target levels was made after full board review of management 2019s 2011 financial plan for entergy corporation , upon recommendation of the finance committee , and after the committee 2019s determination that the established targets aligned with entergy corporation 2019s anticipated 2011 financial performance as reflected in the financial plan . the targets established to measure management performance against as reported results were: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>minimum</td><td>target</td><td>maximum</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>earnings per share ( $ )</td><td>$ 6.10</td><td>$ 6.60</td><td>$ 7.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating cash flow ( $ in billions )</td><td>$ 2.97</td><td>$ 3.35</td><td>$ 3.70</td></tr></table> operating cash flow ( $ in billions ) in january 2012 , after reviewing earnings per share and operating cash flow results against the performance objectives in the above table , the committee determined that entergy corporation had exceeded as reported earnings per share target of $ 6.60 by $ 0.95 in 2011 while falling short of the operating cash flow goal of $ 3.35 billion by $ 221 million in 2011 . in accordance with the terms of the annual incentive plan , in january 2012 , the personnel committee certified the 2012 entergy achievement multiplier at 128% ( 128 % ) of target . under the terms of the management effectiveness program , the entergy achievement multiplier is automatically increased by 25 percent for the members of the office of the chief executive if the pre- established underlying performance goals established by the personnel committee are satisfied at the end of the performance period , subject to the personnel committee's discretion to adjust the automatic multiplier downward or eliminate it altogether . in accordance with section 162 ( m ) of the internal revenue code , the multiplier which entergy refers to as the management effectiveness factor is intended to provide the committee a mechanism to take into consideration specific achievement factors relating to the overall performance of entergy corporation . in january 2012 , the committee eliminated the management effectiveness factor with respect to the 2011 incentive awards , reflecting the personnel committee's determination that the entergy achievement multiplier , in and of itself without the management effectiveness factor , was consistent with the performance levels achieved by management . the annual incentive awards for the named executive officers ( other than mr . leonard , mr . denault and mr . taylor ) are awarded from an incentive pool approved by the committee . from this pool , each named executive officer 2019s supervisor determines the annual incentive payment based on the entergy achievement multiplier . the supervisor has the discretion to increase or decrease the multiple used to determine an incentive award based on individual and business unit performance . the incentive awards are subject to the ultimate approval of entergy 2019s chief executive officer. .\nQuestion: in the year of 2011, by what amount did the operating cash flow fall short from the target one?\nAnswer: 221.0\nQuestion: and what was that target cash flow?\nAnswer: 3.35\nQuestion: what percentage, then, did that amount represent in relation to it?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "65.97015" } ]
CONVFINQA9229	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmondavi produces , markets and sells premium , super-premium and fine california wines under the woodbridge by robert mondavi , robert mondavi private selection and robert mondavi winery brand names . woodbridge and robert mondavi private selection are the leading premium and super-premium wine brands by volume , respectively , in the united states . the acquisition of robert mondavi supports the company 2019s strategy of strengthening the breadth of its portfolio across price segments to capitalize on the overall growth in the pre- mium , super-premium and fine wine categories . the company believes that the acquired robert mondavi brand names have strong brand recognition globally . the vast majority of robert mondavi 2019s sales are generated in the united states . the company intends to leverage the robert mondavi brands in the united states through its selling , marketing and distribution infrastructure . the company also intends to further expand distribution for the robert mondavi brands in europe through its constellation europe infrastructure . the company and robert mondavi have complementary busi- nesses that share a common growth orientation and operating philosophy . the robert mondavi acquisition provides the company with a greater presence in the fine wine sector within the united states and the ability to capitalize on the broader geographic distribution in strategic international markets . the robert mondavi acquisition supports the company 2019s strategy of growth and breadth across categories and geographies , and strengthens its competitive position in its core markets . in par- ticular , the company believes there are growth opportunities for premium , super-premium and fine wines in the united kingdom , united states and other wine markets . total consid- eration paid in cash to the robert mondavi shareholders was $ 1030.7 million . additionally , the company expects to incur direct acquisition costs of $ 11.2 million . the purchase price was financed with borrowings under the company 2019s 2004 credit agreement ( as defined in note 9 ) . in accordance with the pur- chase method of accounting , the acquired net assets are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition . the purchase price was based primarily on the estimated future operating results of robert mondavi , including the factors described above , as well as an estimated benefit from operating cost synergies . the results of operations of the robert mondavi business are reported in the constellation wines segment and have been included in the consolidated statement of income since the acquisition date . the following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the robert mondavi acquisition at the date of acquisition . the company is in the process of obtaining third-party valuations of certain assets and liabilities , and refining its restructuring plan which is under development and will be finalized during the company 2019s year ending february 28 , 2006 ( see note19 ) . accordingly , the allocation of the purchase price is subject to refinement . estimated fair values at december 22 , 2004 , are as follows : {in thousands} . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>current assets</td><td>$ 494788</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property plant and equipment</td><td>452902</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other assets</td><td>178823</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trademarks</td><td>186000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>goodwill</td><td>590459</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>1902972</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>309051</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>long-term liabilities</td><td>552060</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total liabilities acquired</td><td>861111</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 1041861</td></tr></table> the trademarks are not subject to amortization . none of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . in connection with the robert mondavi acquisition and robert mondavi 2019s previously disclosed intention to sell certain of its winery properties and related assets , and other vineyard prop- erties , the company has classified certain assets as held for sale as of february 28 , 2005 . the company expects to sell these assets during the year ended february 28 , 2006 , for net pro- ceeds of approximately $ 150 million to $ 175 million . no gain or loss is expected to be recognized upon the sale of these assets . hardy acquisition 2013 on march 27 , 2003 , the company acquired control of brl hardy limited , now known as hardy wine company limited ( 201chardy 201d ) , and on april 9 , 2003 , the company completed its acquisition of all of hardy 2019s outstanding capital stock . as a result of the acquisition of hardy , the company also acquired the remaining 50% ( 50 % ) ownership of pacific wine partners llc ( 201cpwp 201d ) , the joint venture the company established with hardy in july 2001 . the acquisition of hardy along with the remaining interest in pwp is referred to together as the 201chardy acquisition . 201d through this acquisition , the company acquired one of australia 2019s largest wine producers with interests in winer- ies and vineyards in most of australia 2019s major wine regions as well as new zealand and the united states and hardy 2019s market- ing and sales operations in the united kingdom . total consideration paid in cash and class a common stock to the hardy shareholders was $ 1137.4 million . additionally , the company recorded direct acquisition costs of $ 17.2 million . the acquisition date for accounting purposes is march 27 , 2003 . the company has recorded a $ 1.6 million reduction in the purchase price to reflect imputed interest between the accounting acquisition date and the final payment of consider- ation . this charge is included as interest expense in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended february 29 , 2004 . the cash portion of the purchase price paid to the hardy shareholders and optionholders ( $ 1060.2 mil- lion ) was financed with $ 660.2 million of borrowings under the company 2019s then existing credit agreement and $ 400.0 million .\nQuestion: between the two acquisitions, was the purchase price for hardy greater than for mondavi?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "yes" } ]
CONVFINQA8314	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\na e s 2 0 0 0 f i n a n c i a l r e v i e w in may 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired an additional 5% ( 5 % ) of the preferred , non-voting shares of eletropaulo for approximately $ 90 million . in january 2000 , 59% ( 59 % ) of the preferred non-voting shares were acquired for approximately $ 1 billion at auction from bndes , the national development bank of brazil . the price established at auction was approximately $ 72.18 per 1000 shares , to be paid in four annual installments com- mencing with a payment of 18.5% ( 18.5 % ) of the total price upon closing of the transaction and installments of 25.9% ( 25.9 % ) , 27.1% ( 27.1 % ) and 28.5% ( 28.5 % ) of the total price to be paid annually thereafter . at december 31 , 2000 , the company had a total economic interest of 49.6% ( 49.6 % ) in eletropaulo . the company accounts for this investment using the equity method based on the related consortium agreement that allows the exercise of significant influence . in august 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired a 49% ( 49 % ) interest in songas limited for approxi- mately $ 40 million . songas limited owns the songo songo gas-to-electricity project in tanzania . under the terms of a project management agreement , the company has assumed overall project management responsibility . the project consists of the refurbishment and operation of five natural gas wells in coastal tanzania , the construction and operation of a 65 mmscf/day gas processing plant and related facilities , the construction of a 230 km marine and land pipeline from the gas plant to dar es salaam and the conversion and upgrading of an existing 112 mw power station in dar es salaam to burn natural gas , with an optional additional unit to be constructed at the plant . since the project is currently under construction , no rev- enues or expenses have been incurred , and therefore no results are shown in the following table . in december 2000 , a subsidiary of the company with edf international s.a . ( 201cedf 201d ) completed the acquisition of an additional 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) interest in light from two sub- sidiaries of reliant energy for approximately $ 136 mil- lion . pursuant to the acquisition , the company acquired 30% ( 30 % ) of the shares while edf acquired the remainder . with the completion of this transaction , the company owns approximately 21.14% ( 21.14 % ) of light . in december 2000 , a subsidiary of the company entered into an agreement with edf to jointly acquire an additional 9.2% ( 9.2 % ) interest in light , which is held by a sub- sidiary of companhia siderurgica nacional ( 201ccsn 201d ) . pursuant to this transaction , the company acquired an additional 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) interest in light for $ 114.6 million . this transaction closed in january 2001 . following the purchase of the light shares previously owned by csn , aes and edf will together be the con- trolling shareholders of light and eletropaulo . aes and edf have agreed that aes will eventually take operational control of eletropaulo and the telecom businesses of light and eletropaulo , while edf will eventually take opera- tional control of light and eletropaulo 2019s electric workshop business . aes and edf intend to continue to pursue a fur- ther rationalization of their ownership stakes in light and eletropaulo , the result of which aes would become the sole controlling shareholder of eletropaulo and edf would become the sole controlling shareholder of light . upon consummation of the transaction , aes will begin consolidating eletropaulo 2019s operating results . the struc- ture and process by which this rationalization may be effected , and the resulting timing , have yet to be deter- mined and will likely be subject to approval by various brazilian regulatory authorities and other third parties . as a result , there can be no assurance that this rationalization will take place . in may 1999 , a subsidiary of the company acquired subscription rights from the brazilian state-controlled eletrobras which allowed it to purchase preferred , non- voting shares in eletropaulo and common shares in light . the aggregate purchase price of the subscription rights and the underlying shares in light and eletropaulo was approximately $ 53 million and $ 77 million , respectively , and represented 3.7% ( 3.7 % ) and 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) economic ownership interest in their capital stock , respectively . the following table presents summarized financial information ( in millions ) for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of and for the years ended december 31,</td><td>2000</td><td>1999</td><td>1998</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenues</td><td>$ 6241</td><td>$ 5960</td><td>$ 8091</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>1989</td><td>1839</td><td>2079</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income</td><td>859</td><td>62</td><td>1146</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>current assets</td><td>2423</td><td>2259</td><td>2712</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>noncurrent assets</td><td>13080</td><td>15359</td><td>19025</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>3370</td><td>3637</td><td>4809</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>noncurrent liabilities</td><td>5927</td><td>7536</td><td>7356</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>stockholder's equity</td><td>6206</td><td>6445</td><td>9572</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: in january of 2000, what was the full price of the acquisition of the preferred non-voting shares at auction from bndes, in billions?\nAnswer: 1.0\nQuestion: what percentage of the total preferred non-voting shares were acquired in that transaction?\nAnswer: 0.59\nQuestion: what, then, can be concluded to have been the total value of all preferred non-voting shares, in billions?\nAnswer: 1.69492\nQuestion: in that same year, what was the revenue for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "6241.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9488	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable 20 : pro forma transitional basel iii tier 1 common capital ratio dollars in millions december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>december 31 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>basel i tier 1 common capital</td><td>$ 28484</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less phased-in regulatory capital adjustments:</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>basel iii quantitative limits</td><td>-228 ( 228 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accumulated other comprehensive income ( a )</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other intangibles</td><td>381</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>all other adjustments</td><td>210</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>estimated basel iii transitional tier 1 common capital ( with 2014 phase-ins )</td><td>$ 28886</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>basel i risk-weighted assets calculated as applicable for 2014</td><td>272321</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>pro forma basel iii transitional tier 1 common capital ratio ( with 2014phase-ins )</td><td>10.6% ( 10.6 % )</td></tr></table> estimated basel iii transitional tier 1 common capital ( with 2014 phase-ins ) $ 28886 basel i risk-weighted assets calculated as applicable for 2014 272321 pro forma basel iii transitional tier 1 common capital ratio ( with 2014 phase-ins ) 10.6% ( 10.6 % ) ( a ) represents net adjustments related to accumulated other comprehensive income for available for sale securities and pension and other postretirement benefit plans . pnc utilizes these fully implemented and transitional basel iii capital ratios to assess its capital position , including comparison to similar estimates made by other financial institutions . these basel iii capital estimates are likely to be impacted by any additional regulatory guidance , continued analysis by pnc as to the application of the rules to pnc , and in the case of ratios calculated using the advanced approaches , the ongoing evolution , validation and regulatory approval of pnc 2019s models integral to the calculation of advanced approaches risk-weighted assets . the access to and cost of funding for new business initiatives , the ability to undertake new business initiatives including acquisitions , the ability to engage in expanded business activities , the ability to pay dividends or repurchase shares or other capital instruments , the level of deposit insurance costs , and the level and nature of regulatory oversight depend , in large part , on a financial institution 2019s capital strength . we provide additional information regarding enhanced capital requirements and some of their potential impacts on pnc in item 1 business 2013 supervision and regulation , item 1a risk factors and note 22 regulatory matters in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . off-balance sheet arrangements and variable interest entities we engage in a variety of activities that involve unconsolidated entities or that are otherwise not reflected in our consolidated balance sheet that are generally referred to as 201coff-balance sheet arrangements . 201d additional information on these types of activities is included in the following sections of this report : 2022 commitments , including contractual obligations and other commitments , included within the risk management section of this item 7 , 2022 note 3 loan sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities in the notes to consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this report , 2022 note 14 capital securities of subsidiary trusts and perpetual trust securities in the notes to consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this report , and 2022 note 24 commitments and guarantees in the notes to consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this report . pnc consolidates variable interest entities ( vies ) when we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary . the primary beneficiary of a vie is determined to be the party that meets both of the following criteria : ( i ) has the power to make decisions that most significantly affect the economic performance of the vie ; and ( ii ) has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that in either case could potentially be significant to the vie . a summary of vies , including those that we have consolidated and those in which we hold variable interests but have not consolidated into our financial statements , as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 is included in note 3 in the notes to consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this report . trust preferred securities and reit preferred securities we are subject to certain restrictions , including restrictions on dividend payments , in connection with $ 206 million in principal amount of an outstanding junior subordinated debenture associated with $ 200 million of trust preferred securities ( both amounts as of december 31 , 2013 ) that were issued by pnc capital trust c , a subsidiary statutory trust . generally , if there is ( i ) an event of default under the debenture , ( ii ) pnc elects to defer interest on the debenture , ( iii ) pnc exercises its right to defer payments on the related trust preferred security issued by the statutory trust , or ( iv ) there is a default under pnc 2019s guarantee of such payment obligations , as specified in the applicable governing documents , then pnc would be subject during the period of such default or deferral to restrictions on dividends and other provisions protecting the status of the debenture holders similar to or in some ways more restrictive than those potentially imposed under the exchange agreement with pnc preferred funding trust ii . see note 14 capital securities of subsidiary trusts and perpetual trust securities in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information on contractual limitations on dividend payments resulting from securities issued by pnc preferred funding trust i and pnc preferred funding trust ii . see the liquidity risk management portion of the risk management section of this item 7 for additional information regarding our first quarter 2013 redemption of the reit preferred securities issued by pnc preferred funding trust iii and additional discussion of redemptions of trust preferred securities . 48 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .\nQuestion: what was the total of other intangibles and all other adjustments in 2013?\nAnswer: 591.0\nQuestion: was the basel i tier 1 common capital without phased-in regulatory capital adjustments greater than estimated basel iii transitional tier 1 common capital with 2014 phase-ins for 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "no" } ]
CONVFINQA1023	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) restructuring accrual as a result of the cytyc merger , the company assumed previous cytyc management approved restructuring plans designed to reduce future operating expenses by consolidating its mountain view , california operations into its existing operations in costa rica and massachusetts as well as restructuring plans relating to cytyc 2019s historical acquisitions completed in march 2007 . in connection with these plans , the company assumed a total liability of approximately $ 4658 . during the twelve months ended september 27 , 2008 , the company did not incur any additional restructuring costs related to retention costs for these employees . as a result of the third wave acquisition , the company assumed previous third wave management approved restructuring plans designed to reduce future operating expenses . in connection with these plans , the company assumed a total liability related to termination benefits of approximately $ 7509 . the company did not incur any additional restructuring costs related to retention costs for these employees from the date of acquisition through september 27 , 2008 . we anticipate that these costs will be paid in full during fiscal 2009 . additionally , the company recorded a liability related to the cytyc merger in accordance with eitf 95-3 as detailed below , primarily related to the termination of certain employees as well as minimum inventory purchase commitments and other contractual obligations for which business activities have been discontinued . during the twelve months ended september 27 , 2008 the company incurred approximately $ 6.4 million of expense related to the resignation of the chairman of the board of directors , which is not included in the table below ( see note 12 ) . changes in the restructuring accrual for the twelve months ended september 27 , 2008 were as follows : twelve months ended september 27 , 2008 termination benefits . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>other</td><td>twelve months ended september 27 2008 other</td><td>twelve months ended september 27 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 105</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cytyc balance acquired october 22 2007</td><td>2014</td><td>4658</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third wave balance acquired july 24 2008</td><td>261</td><td>7029</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>provided for under eitf no . 95-3</td><td>1820</td><td>1020</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>adjustments</td><td>-382 ( 382 )</td><td>-270 ( 270 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>payments</td><td>-817 ( 817 )</td><td>-11233 ( 11233 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 882</td><td>$ 1309</td></tr></table> as of the dates of acquisition of aeg elektrofotografie gmbh ( 201caeg 201d ) , r2 technology , inc . ( 201cr2 201d ) and suros surgical , inc . ( 201csuros 201d ) ( see note 3 ) , management of the company implemented and finalized plans to involuntarily terminate certain employees of the acquired companies . these plans resulted in a liability for costs associated with an employee severance arrangement of approximately $ 3135 in accordance with eitf issue no . 95-3 , recognition of liabilities in connection with a purchase business combination . as of september 29 , 2007 , all amounts other than $ 105 had been paid . the company had made full payment on this remaining liability as of september 27 , 2008 . advertising costs advertising costs are charged to operations as incurred . the company does not have any direct-response advertising . advertising costs , which include trade shows and conventions , were approximately $ 15281 , $ 6683 and $ 5003 for fiscal 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and were included in selling and marketing expense in the consolidated statements of operations. .\nQuestion: what was the total of advertising costs in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "6683.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8663	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nedwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 12 . employee benefit plans ( continued ) equity and debt securities are valued at fair value based on quoted market prices reported on the active markets on which the individual securities are traded . the insurance contracts are valued at the cash surrender value of the contracts , which is deemed to approximate its fair value . the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , at december 31 , 2016 , are expected to be paid ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 4.5</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>4.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>4.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>4.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2021-2025</td><td>44.6</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2016 , expected employer contributions for 2017 are $ 6.1 million . defined contribution plans the company 2019s employees in the united states and puerto rico are eligible to participate in a qualified defined contribution plan . in the united states , participants may contribute up to 25% ( 25 % ) of their eligible compensation ( subject to tax code limitation ) to the plan . edwards lifesciences matches the first 3% ( 3 % ) of the participant 2019s annual eligible compensation contributed to the plan on a dollar-for-dollar basis . edwards lifesciences matches the next 2% ( 2 % ) of the participant 2019s annual eligible compensation to the plan on a 50% ( 50 % ) basis . in puerto rico , participants may contribute up to 25% ( 25 % ) of their annual compensation ( subject to tax code limitation ) to the plan . edwards lifesciences matches the first 4% ( 4 % ) of participant 2019s annual eligible compensation contributed to the plan on a 50% ( 50 % ) basis . the company also provides a 2% ( 2 % ) profit sharing contribution calculated on eligible earnings for each employee . matching contributions relating to edwards lifesciences employees were $ 17.3 million , $ 15.3 million , and $ 12.8 million in 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , respectively . the company also has nonqualified deferred compensation plans for a select group of employees . the plans provide eligible participants the opportunity to defer eligible compensation to future dates specified by the participant with a return based on investment alternatives selected by the participant . the amount accrued under these nonqualified plans was $ 46.7 million and $ 35.5 million at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . 13 . common stock treasury stock in july 2014 , the board of directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the company to purchase up to $ 750.0 million of the company 2019s common stock . in november 2016 , the board of directors approved a new stock repurchase program providing for an additional $ 1.0 billion of repurchases of our common stock . the repurchase programs do not have an expiration date . stock repurchased under these programs may be used to offset obligations under the company 2019s employee stock-based benefit programs and stock-based business acquisitions , and will reduce the total shares outstanding . during 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , the company repurchased 7.3 million , 2.6 million , and 4.4 million shares , respectively , at an aggregate cost of $ 662.3 million , $ 280.1 million , and $ 300.9 million , respectively , including .\nQuestion: what was the change in the total of matching contributions from 2014 to 2016?\nAnswer: 4.5\nQuestion: and how much does this change represent in relation to those contributions in 2014, in percentage?\nAnswer: 0.35156\nQuestion: and between the two years subsequent to that period, what was the change in the benefits expected to be paid?\nAnswer: -0.5\nQuestion: what was this change as a percentage of those benefits in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.11111" } ]
CONVFINQA6753	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nliquidity and capital resources as of december 31 , 2006 , our principal sources of liquidity included cash , cash equivalents , the sale of receivables , and our revolving credit facilities , as well as the availability of commercial paper and other sources of financing through the capital markets . we had $ 2 billion of committed credit facilities available , of which there were no borrowings outstanding as of december 31 , 2006 , and we did not make any short-term borrowings under these facilities during the year . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the sale of receivables program was $ 600 million as of december 31 , 2006 . the sale of receivables program is subject to certain requirements , including the maintenance of an investment grade bond rating . if our bond rating were to deteriorate , it could have an adverse impact on our liquidity . access to commercial paper is dependent on market conditions . deterioration of our operating results or financial condition due to internal or external factors could negatively impact our ability to utilize commercial paper as a source of liquidity . liquidity through the capital markets is also dependent on our financial stability . at both december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had a working capital deficit of approximately $ 1.1 billion . a working capital deficit is common in our industry and does not indicate a lack of liquidity . we maintain adequate resources to meet our daily cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . financial condition cash flows millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flowsmillions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2880</td><td>$ 2595</td><td>$ 2257</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2042 ( 2042 )</td><td>-2047 ( 2047 )</td><td>-1732 ( 1732 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-784 ( 784 )</td><td>-752 ( 752 )</td><td>-75 ( 75 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 54</td><td>$ -204 ( 204 )</td><td>$ 450</td></tr></table> cash provided by operating activities 2013 higher income in 2006 generated the increased cash provided by operating activities , which was partially offset by higher income tax payments , $ 150 million in voluntary pension contributions , higher material and supply inventories , and higher management incentive payments in 2006 . higher income , lower management incentive payments in 2005 ( executive bonuses , which would have been paid to individuals in 2005 , were not awarded based on company performance in 2004 and bonuses for the professional workforce that were paid out in 2005 were significantly reduced ) , and working capital performance generated higher cash from operating activities in 2005 . a voluntary pension contribution of $ 100 million in 2004 also augmented the positive year-over-year variance in 2005 as no pension contribution was made in 2005 . this improvement was partially offset by cash received in 2004 for income tax refunds . cash used in investing activities 2013 an insurance settlement for the 2005 january west coast storm and lower balances for work in process decreased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2006 . higher capital investments and lower proceeds from asset sales partially offset this decrease . increased capital spending , partially offset by higher proceeds from asset sales , increased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2005 compared to 2004 . cash used in financing activities 2013 the increase in cash used in financing activities primarily resulted from lower net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 189 million in 2006 compared to $ 262 million in 2005 ) . the increase in 2005 results from debt issuances in 2004 and higher debt repayments in 2005 . we did not issue debt in 2005 versus $ 745 million of debt issuances in 2004 , and we repaid $ 699 million of debt in 2005 compared to $ 588 million in 2004 . the higher outflows in 2005 were partially offset by higher net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 262 million in 2005 compared to $ 80 million in 2004 ) . .\nQuestion: what was the cash used in investing activities in 2005?\nAnswer: 2047.0\nQuestion: and what was the one used in financing activities?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "752.0" } ]
CONVFINQA11019	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nother taxes decreased in 2001 because its utility operations in virginia became subject to state income taxes in lieu of gross receipts taxes effective january 2001 . in addition , dominion recognized higher effective rates for foreign earnings and higher pretax income in relation to non-conventional fuel tax credits realized . dominion energy 2002 2001 2000 ( millions , except per share amounts ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions except pershare amounts )</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating revenue</td><td>$ 5940</td><td>$ 6144</td><td>$ 4894</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating expenses</td><td>4520</td><td>4749</td><td>3939</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income contribution</td><td>770</td><td>723</td><td>489</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>earnings per share contribution</td><td>$ 2.72</td><td>$ 2.86</td><td>$ 2.07</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>electricity supplied* ( million mwhrs )</td><td>101</td><td>95</td><td>83</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>gas transmission throughput ( bcf )</td><td>597</td><td>553</td><td>567</td></tr></table> * amounts presented are for electricity supplied by utility and merchant generation operations . operating results 2014 2002 dominion energy contributed $ 2.72 per diluted share on net income of $ 770 million for 2002 , a net income increase of $ 47 million and an earnings per share decrease of $ 0.14 over 2001 . net income for 2002 reflected lower operating revenue ( $ 204 million ) , operating expenses ( $ 229 million ) and other income ( $ 27 million ) . interest expense and income taxes , which are discussed on a consolidated basis , decreased $ 50 million over 2001 . the earnings per share decrease reflected share dilution . regulated electric sales revenue increased $ 179 million . favorable weather conditions , reflecting increased cooling and heating degree-days , as well as customer growth , are estimated to have contributed $ 133 million and $ 41 million , respectively . fuel rate recoveries increased approximately $ 65 million for 2002 . these recoveries are generally offset by increases in elec- tric fuel expense and do not materially affect income . partially offsetting these increases was a net decrease of $ 60 million due to other factors not separately measurable , such as the impact of economic conditions on customer usage , as well as variations in seasonal rate premiums and discounts . nonregulated electric sales revenue increased $ 9 million . sales revenue from dominion 2019s merchant generation fleet decreased $ 21 million , reflecting a $ 201 million decline due to lower prices partially offset by sales from assets acquired and constructed in 2002 and the inclusion of millstone operations for all of 2002 . revenue from the wholesale marketing of utility generation decreased $ 74 million . due to the higher demand of utility service territory customers during 2002 , less production from utility plant generation was available for profitable sale in the wholesale market . revenue from retail energy sales increased $ 71 million , reflecting primarily customer growth over the prior year . net revenue from dominion 2019s electric trading activities increased $ 33 million , reflecting the effect of favorable price changes on unsettled contracts and higher trading margins . nonregulated gas sales revenue decreased $ 351 million . the decrease included a $ 239 million decrease in sales by dominion 2019s field services and retail energy marketing opera- tions , reflecting to a large extent declining prices . revenue associated with gas trading operations , net of related cost of sales , decreased $ 112 million . the decrease included $ 70 mil- lion of realized and unrealized losses on the economic hedges of natural gas production by the dominion exploration & pro- duction segment . as described below under selected information 2014 energy trading activities , sales of natural gas by the dominion exploration & production segment at market prices offset these financial losses , resulting in a range of prices contemplated by dominion 2019s overall risk management strategy . the remaining $ 42 million decrease was due to unfavorable price changes on unsettled contracts and lower overall trading margins . those losses were partially offset by contributions from higher trading volumes in gas and oil markets . gas transportation and storage revenue decreased $ 44 million , primarily reflecting lower rates . electric fuel and energy purchases expense increased $ 94 million which included an increase of $ 66 million associated with dominion 2019s energy marketing operations that are not sub- ject to cost-based rate regulation and an increase of $ 28 million associated with utility operations . substantially all of the increase associated with non-regulated energy marketing opera- tions related to higher volumes purchased during the year . for utility operations , energy costs increased $ 66 million for pur- chases subject to rate recovery , partially offset by a $ 38 million decrease in fuel expenses associated with lower wholesale mar- keting of utility plant generation . purchased gas expense decreased $ 245 million associated with dominion 2019s field services and retail energy marketing oper- ations . this decrease reflected approximately $ 162 million asso- ciated with declining prices and $ 83 million associated with lower purchased volumes . liquids , pipeline capacity and other purchases decreased $ 64 million , primarily reflecting comparably lower levels of rate recoveries of certain costs of transmission operations in the cur- rent year period . the difference between actual expenses and amounts recovered in the period are deferred pending future rate adjustments . other operations and maintenance expense decreased $ 14 million , primarily reflecting an $ 18 million decrease in outage costs due to fewer generation unit outages in the current year . depreciation expense decreased $ 11 million , reflecting decreases in depreciation associated with changes in the esti- mated useful lives of certain electric generation property , par- tially offset by increased depreciation associated with state line and millstone operations . other income decreased $ 27 million , including a $ 14 mil- lion decrease in net realized investment gains in the millstone 37d o m i n i o n 2019 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t .\nQuestion: what was operating revenue in 2001?\nAnswer: 6144.0\nQuestion: what was it in 2000?\nAnswer: 4894.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 1250.0\nQuestion: what was the 2000 value?\nAnswer: 4894.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.25541" } ]
CONVFINQA10600	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements guarantees of subsidiaries . group inc . fully and unconditionally guarantees the securities issued by gs finance corp. , a wholly-owned finance subsidiary of the group inc . has guaranteed the payment obligations of goldman , sachs & co . ( gs&co. ) , gs bank usa and goldman sachs execution & clearing , l.p . ( gsec ) , subject to certain exceptions . in november 2008 , the firm contributed subsidiaries into gs bank usa , and group inc . agreed to guarantee the reimbursement of certain losses , including credit-related losses , relating to assets held by the contributed entities . in connection with this guarantee , group inc . also agreed to pledge to gs bank usa certain collateral , including interests in subsidiaries and other illiquid assets . in addition , group inc . guarantees many of the obligations of its other consolidated subsidiaries on a transaction-by- transaction basis , as negotiated with counterparties . group inc . is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under its subsidiary guarantees ; however , because these guaranteed obligations are also obligations of consolidated subsidiaries , group inc . 2019s liabilities as guarantor are not separately disclosed . note 19 . shareholders 2019 equity common equity dividends declared per common share were $ 2.25 in 2014 , $ 2.05 in 2013 and $ 1.77 in 2012 . on january 15 , 2015 , group inc . declared a dividend of $ 0.60 per common share to be paid on march 30 , 2015 to common shareholders of record on march 2 , 2015 . the firm 2019s share repurchase program is intended to help maintain the appropriate level of common equity . the share repurchase program is effected primarily through regular open-market purchases ( which may include repurchase plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 ) , the amounts and timing of which are determined primarily by the firm 2019s current and projected capital position , but which may also be influenced by general market conditions and the prevailing price and trading volumes of the firm 2019s common stock . prior to repurchasing common stock , the firm must receive confirmation that the federal reserve board does not object to such capital actions . the table below presents the amount of common stock repurchased by the firm under the share repurchase program during 2014 , 2013 and 2012. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions except per share amounts</td><td>year ended december 2014</td><td>year ended december 2013</td><td>year ended december 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>common share repurchases</td><td>31.8</td><td>39.3</td><td>42.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average cost per share</td><td>$ 171.79</td><td>$ 157.11</td><td>$ 110.31</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total cost of common share repurchases</td><td>$ 5469</td><td>$ 6175</td><td>$ 4637</td></tr></table> total cost of common share repurchases $ 5469 $ 6175 $ 4637 pursuant to the terms of certain share-based compensation plans , employees may remit shares to the firm or the firm may cancel restricted stock units ( rsus ) or stock options to satisfy minimum statutory employee tax withholding requirements and the exercise price of stock options . under these plans , during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , employees remitted 174489 shares , 161211 shares and 33477 shares with a total value of $ 31 million , $ 25 million and $ 3 million , and the firm cancelled 5.8 million , 4.0 million and 12.7 million of rsus with a total value of $ 974 million , $ 599 million and $ 1.44 billion . under these plans , the firm also cancelled 15.6 million stock options with a total value of $ 2.65 billion during 2014 . 170 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .\nQuestion: what is the total cost of common share repurchases in 2014?\nAnswer: 5469.0\nQuestion: what about in 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "6175.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8328	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\na reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits , for the periods indicated , is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 29010</td><td>$ 34366</td><td>$ 29132</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>7119</td><td>6997</td><td>5234</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-12356 ( 12356 )</td><td>-12353 ( 12353 )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapses of applicable statutes of limitations</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 23773</td><td>$ 29010</td><td>$ 34366</td></tr></table> the entire amount of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate if recognized . in 2010 , the company favorably settled a 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company recorded a net overall tax benefit including accrued interest of $ 25920 thousand . in addition , the company was also able to take down a $ 12356 thousand fin 48 reserve that had been established regarding the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state and local or foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2007 . the company recognizes accrued interest related to net unrecognized tax benefits and penalties in income taxes . during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , the company accrued and recognized a net expense ( benefit ) of approximately $ ( 9938 ) thousand , $ 1563 thousand and $ 2446 thousand , respectively , in interest and penalties . included within the 2010 net expense ( benefit ) of $ ( 9938 ) thousand is $ ( 10591 ) thousand of accrued interest related to the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company is not aware of any positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within twelve months of the reporting date . for u.s . income tax purposes the company has foreign tax credit carryforwards of $ 55026 thousand that begin to expire in 2014 . in addition , for u.s . income tax purposes the company has $ 41693 thousand of alternative minimum tax credits that do not expire . management believes that it is more likely than not that the company will realize the benefits of its net deferred tax assets and , accordingly , no valuation allowance has been recorded for the periods presented . tax benefits of $ 629 thousand and $ 1714 thousand related to share-based compensation deductions for stock options exercised in 2010 and 2009 , respectively , are included within additional paid-in capital of the shareholders 2019 equity section of the consolidated balance sheets. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the net expense in interest and penalties from 2008 to 2009?\nAnswer: -883.0\nQuestion: and what is this change as a percentage of that net expense in 2008?\nAnswer: -0.361\nQuestion: and in the next year of that period, 2010, what was the balance at january 1?\nAnswer: 29010.0\nQuestion: with the additions based on tax positions related to the current year, what became that balance?\nAnswer: 36129.0\nQuestion: and including the net overall tax benefit recorded from the settlements, what then became that balance?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "62049.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8741	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increased recovery of deferred fuel and purchased power costs primarily due to an increase in april 2004 in the energy cost recovery rider and the true-ups to the 2003 and 2002 energy cost recovery rider filings . other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the over-recovery of grand gulf costs due to an increase in the grand gulf rider effective january 2004 . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy arkansas' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2002 net revenue</td><td>$ 1095.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>march 2002 settlement agreement</td><td>-154.0 ( 154.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-7.7 ( 7.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>asset retirement obligation</td><td>30.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>16.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>deferred fuel cost revisions</td><td>10.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>7.6</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 998.7</td></tr></table> the march 2002 settlement agreement resolved a request for recovery of ice storm costs incurred in december 2000 with an offset of those costs for funds contributed to pay for future stranded costs . a 1997 settlement provided for the collection of earnings in excess of an 11% ( 11 % ) return on equity in a transition cost account ( tca ) to offset stranded costs if retail open access were implemented . in mid- and late december 2000 , two separate ice storms left 226000 and 212500 entergy arkansas customers , respectively , without electric power in its service area . entergy arkansas filed a proposal to recover costs plus carrying charges associated with power restoration caused by the ice storms . entergy arkansas' final storm damage cost determination reflected costs of approximately $ 195 million . the apsc approved a settlement agreement submitted in march 2002 by entergy arkansas , the apsc staff , and the arkansas attorney general . in the march 2002 settlement , the parties agreed that $ 153 million of the ice storm costs would be classified as incremental ice storm expenses that can be offset against the tca on a rate class basis , and any excess of ice storm costs over the amount available in the tca would be deferred and amortized over 30 years , although such excess costs were not allowed to be included as a separate component of rate base . the allocated ice storm expenses exceeded the available tca funds by $ 15.8 million which was recorded as a regulatory asset in june 2002 . in accordance with the settlement agreement and following the apsc's approval of the 2001 earnings review related to the tca , entergy arkansas filed to return $ 18.1 million of the tca to certain large general service class customers that paid more into the tca than their allocation of storm costs . the apsc approved the return of funds to the large general service customer class in the form of refund checks in august 2002 . as part of the implementation of the march 2002 settlement agreement provisions , the tca procedure ceased with the 2001 earnings evaluation . of the remaining ice storm costs , $ 32.2 million was addressed through established ratemaking procedures , including $ 22.2 million classified as capital additions , while $ 3.8 million of the ice storm costs was not recovered through rates . the effect on net income of the march 2002 settlement agreement and 2001 earnings review was a $ 2.2 million increase in 2003 , because the decrease in net revenue was offset by the decrease in operation and maintenance expenses discussed below. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in net revenue between 2002 and 2003?\nAnswer: 97.2\nQuestion: and the value for 2003 specifically?\nAnswer: 998.7\nQuestion: so what was the percentage change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.09733" } ]
CONVFINQA8412	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndisclosure of , the issuance of certain types of guarantees . the adoption of fasb interpretation no . 45 did not have a signif- icant impact on the net income or equity of the company . in january 2003 , fasb interpretation no . 46 , 201cconsolidation of variable interest entities , an interpretation of arb 51 , 201d was issued . the primary objectives of this interpretation , as amended , are to provide guidance on the identification and consolidation of variable interest entities , or vies , which are entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights . the company has completed an analysis of this interpretation and has determined that it does not have any vies . 4 . acquisitions family health plan , inc . effective january 1 , 2004 , the company commenced opera- tions in ohio through the acquisition from family health plan , inc . of certain medicaid-related assets for a purchase price of approximately $ 6800 . the cost to acquire the medicaid-related assets will be allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed according to estimated fair values . hmo blue texas effective august 1 , 2003 , the company acquired certain medicaid-related contract rights of hmo blue texas in the san antonio , texas market for $ 1045 . the purchase price was allocated to acquired contracts , which are being amor- tized on a straight-line basis over a period of five years , the expected period of benefit . group practice affiliates during 2003 , the company acquired a 100% ( 100 % ) ownership interest in group practice affiliates , llc , a behavioral healthcare services company ( 63.7% ( 63.7 % ) in march 2003 and 36.3% ( 36.3 % ) in august 2003 ) . the consolidated financial state- ments include the results of operations of gpa since march 1 , 2003 . the company paid $ 1800 for its purchase of gpa . the cost to acquire the ownership interest has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed according to estimated fair values and is subject to adjustment when additional information concerning asset and liability valuations are finalized . the preliminary allocation has resulted in goodwill of approximately $ 3895 . the goodwill is not amortized and is not deductible for tax purposes . pro forma disclosures related to the acquisition have been excluded as immaterial . scriptassist in march 2003 , the company purchased contract and name rights of scriptassist , llc ( scriptassist ) , a medication com- pliance company . the purchase price of $ 563 was allocated to acquired contracts , which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of five years , the expected period of benefit . the investor group who held membership interests in scriptassist included one of the company 2019s executive officers . university health plans , inc . on december 1 , 2002 , the company purchased 80% ( 80 % ) of the outstanding capital stock of university health plans , inc . ( uhp ) in new jersey . in october 2003 , the company exercised its option to purchase the remaining 20% ( 20 % ) of the outstanding capital stock . centene paid a total purchase price of $ 13258 . the results of operations for uhp are included in the consolidated financial statements since december 1 , 2002 . the acquisition of uhp resulted in identified intangible assets of $ 3800 , representing purchased contract rights and provider network . the intangibles are being amortized over a ten-year period . goodwill of $ 7940 is not amortized and is not deductible for tax purposes . changes during 2003 to the preliminary purchase price allocation primarily consisted of the purchase of the remaining 20% ( 20 % ) of the outstanding stock and the recognition of intangible assets and related deferred tax liabilities . the following unaudited pro forma information presents the results of operations of centene and subsidiaries as if the uhp acquisition described above had occurred as of january 1 , 2001 . these pro forma results may not necessar- ily reflect the actual results of operations that would have been achieved , nor are they necessarily indicative of future results of operations. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 567048</td><td>$ 395155</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net earnings</td><td>25869</td><td>11573</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>diluted earnings per common share</td><td>1.48</td><td>1.00</td></tr></table> diluted earnings per common share 1.48 1.00 texas universities health plan in june 2002 , the company purchased schip contracts in three texas service areas . the cash purchase price of $ 595 was recorded as purchased contract rights , which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over five years , the expected period of benefit . bankers reserve in march 2002 , the company acquired bankers reserve life insurance company of wisconsin for a cash purchase price of $ 3527 . the company allocated the purchase price to net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their fair value . centene allocated $ 479 to identifiable intangible assets , representing the value assigned to acquired licenses , which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) centene corporation and subsidiaries .\nQuestion: what is the difference in diluted earnings per common share from 2001 to 2002?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.48" } ]
CONVFINQA7399	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 the following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 348</td><td>$ 352</td><td>$ 364</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions for current year tax positions</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>146</td><td>2</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>( 26 )</td><td>( 5 )</td><td>( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>( 13 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>( 7 )</td><td>( 1 )</td><td>( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 463</td><td>$ 348</td><td>$ 352</td></tr></table> the company and certain of its subsidiaries are currently under examination by the relevant taxing authorities for various tax years . the company regularly assesses the potential outcome of these examinations in each of the taxing jurisdictions when determining the adequacy of the amount of unrecognized tax benefit recorded . while it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position , we believe we have appropriately accrued for our uncertain tax benefits . however , audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements and future events that would impact our previously recorded unrecognized tax benefits and the range of anticipated increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits are subject to significant uncertainty . it is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may exceed our provision for current unrecognized tax benefits in amounts that could be material , but cannot be estimated as of december 31 , 2018 . our effective tax rate and net income in any given future period could therefore be materially impacted . 22 . discontinued operations due to a portfolio evaluation in the first half of 2016 , management decided to pursue a strategic shift of its distribution companies in brazil , sul and eletropaulo , to reduce the company's exposure to the brazilian distribution market . the disposals of sul and eletropaulo were completed in october 2016 and june 2018 , respectively . eletropaulo 2014 in november 2017 , eletropaulo converted its preferred shares into ordinary shares and transitioned the listing of those shares to the novo mercado , which is a listing segment of the brazilian stock exchange with the highest standards of corporate governance . upon conversion of the preferred shares into ordinary shares , aes no longer controlled eletropaulo , but maintained significant influence over the business . as a result , the company deconsolidated eletropaulo . after deconsolidation , the company's 17% ( 17 % ) ownership interest was reflected as an equity method investment . the company recorded an after-tax loss on deconsolidation of $ 611 million , which primarily consisted of $ 455 million related to cumulative translation losses and $ 243 million related to pension losses reclassified from aocl . in december 2017 , all the remaining criteria were met for eletropaulo to qualify as a discontinued operation . therefore , its results of operations and financial position were reported as such in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented . in june 2018 , the company completed the sale of its entire 17% ( 17 % ) ownership interest in eletropaulo through a bidding process hosted by the brazilian securities regulator , cvm . gross proceeds of $ 340 million were received at our subsidiary in brazil , subject to the payment of taxes . upon disposal of eletropaulo , the company recorded a pre-tax gain on sale of $ 243 million ( after-tax $ 199 million ) . excluding the gain on sale , eletropaulo's pre-tax loss attributable to aes was immaterial for the year ended december 31 , 2018 . eletropaulo's pre-tax loss attributable to aes , including the loss on deconsolidation , for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 was $ 633 million and $ 192 million , respectively . prior to its classification as discontinued operations , eletropaulo was reported in the south america sbu reportable segment . sul 2014 the company executed an agreement for the sale of sul , a wholly-owned subsidiary , in june 2016 . the results of operations and financial position of sul are reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented . upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria , the company recognized an after-tax loss of $ 382 million comprised of a pre-tax impairment charge of $ 783 million , offset by a tax benefit of $ 266 million related to the impairment of the sul long lived assets and a tax benefit of $ 135 million for deferred taxes related to the investment in sul . prior to the impairment charge , the carrying value of the sul asset group of $ 1.6 billion was greater than its approximate fair value less costs to sell . however , the impairment charge was limited to the carrying value of the long lived assets of the sul disposal group. .\nQuestion: what was the balance of unrecognized tax benefits for 2018?\nAnswer: 348.0\nQuestion: and for 2017?\nAnswer: 352.0\nQuestion: so what was the difference in this value between the two years?\nAnswer: -4.0\nQuestion: and the percentage change over this time?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.01136" } ]
CONVFINQA4501	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmarathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements stock-based performance unit awards 2013 during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 we granted 754140 , 563631 and 1205517 stock- based performance unit awards to officers . at december 31 , 2018 , there were 1196176 units outstanding . total stock-based performance unit awards expense was $ 13 million in 2018 , $ 8 million in 2017 and $ 6 million in 2016 . the key assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation to determine the fair value of stock-based performance units granted in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>valuation date stock price</td><td>$ 14.17</td><td>$ 14.17</td><td>$ 14.17</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected annual dividend yield</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>39% ( 39 % )</td><td>43% ( 43 % )</td><td>52% ( 52 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.5% ( 2.5 % )</td><td>2.6% ( 2.6 % )</td><td>2.4% ( 2.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fair value of stock-based performance units outstanding</td><td>$ 19.60</td><td>$ 19.45</td><td>$ 21.51</td></tr></table> 18 . defined benefit postretirement plans and defined contribution plan we have noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all domestic employees , as well as u.k . employees who were hired before april 2010 . certain employees located in e.g. , who are u.s . or u.k . based , also participate in these plans . benefits under these plans are based on plan provisions specific to each plan . for the u.k . pension plan , the principal employer and plan trustees reached a decision to close the plan to future benefit accruals effective december 31 , 2015 . we also have defined benefit plans for other postretirement benefits covering our u.s . employees . health care benefits are provided up to age 65 through comprehensive hospital , surgical and major medical benefit provisions subject to various cost- sharing features . post-age 65 health care benefits are provided to certain u.s . employees on a defined contribution basis . life insurance benefits are provided to certain retiree beneficiaries . these other postretirement benefits are not funded in advance . employees hired after 2016 are not eligible for any postretirement health care or life insurance benefits. .\nQuestion: what was the fair value of stock-based performance units outstanding in 2018?\nAnswer: 19.6\nQuestion: what was the value in 2016?\nAnswer: 21.51\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-1.91" } ]
CONVFINQA9153	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company is currently under audit by the internal revenue service and other major taxing jurisdictions around the world . it is thus reasonably possible that significant changes in the gross balance of unrecognized tax benefits may occur within the next 12 months , but the company does not expect such audits to result in amounts that would cause a significant change to its effective tax rate , other than the following items . the company is currently at irs appeals for the years 1999 20132002 . one of the issues relates to the timing of the inclusion of interchange fees received by the company relating to credit card purchases by its cardholders . it is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months the company can either reach agreement on this issue at appeals or decide to litigate the issue . this issue is presently being litigated by another company in a united states tax court case . the gross uncertain tax position for this item at december 31 , 2008 is $ 542 million . since this is a temporary difference , the only effect to the company 2019s effective tax rate would be due to net interest and state tax rate differentials . if the reserve were to be released , the tax benefit could be as much as $ 168 million . in addition , the company expects to conclude the irs audit of its u.s . federal consolidated income tax returns for the years 2003 20132005 within the next 12 months . the gross uncertain tax position at december 31 , 2008 for the items expected to be resolved is approximately $ 350 million plus gross interest of $ 70 million . the potential net tax benefit to continuing operations could be approximately $ 325 million . the following are the major tax jurisdictions in which the company and its affiliates operate and the earliest tax year subject to examination: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>jurisdiction</td><td>tax year</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united states</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>mexico</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>new york state and city</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>united kingdom</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>germany</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>korea</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>japan</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>brazil</td><td>2004</td></tr></table> foreign pretax earnings approximated $ 10.3 billion in 2008 , $ 9.1 billion in 2007 , and $ 13.6 billion in 2006 ( $ 5.1 billion , $ 0.7 billion and $ 0.9 billion of which , respectively , are in discontinued operations ) . as a u.s . corporation , citigroup and its u.s . subsidiaries are subject to u.s . taxation currently on all foreign pretax earnings earned by a foreign branch . pretax earnings of a foreign subsidiary or affiliate are subject to u.s . taxation when effectively repatriated . the company provides income taxes on the undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries except to the extent that such earnings are indefinitely invested outside the united states . at december 31 , 2008 , $ 22.8 billion of accumulated undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries were indefinitely invested . at the existing u.s . federal income tax rate , additional taxes ( net of u.s . foreign tax credits ) of $ 6.1 billion would have to be provided if such earnings were remitted currently . the current year 2019s effect on the income tax expense from continuing operations is included in the foreign income tax rate differential line in the reconciliation of the federal statutory rate to the company 2019s effective income tax rate on the previous page . income taxes are not provided for on the company 2019s savings bank base year bad debt reserves that arose before 1988 because under current u.s . tax rules such taxes will become payable only to the extent such amounts are distributed in excess of limits prescribed by federal law . at december 31 , 2008 , the amount of the base year reserves totaled approximately $ 358 million ( subject to a tax of $ 125 million ) . the company has no valuation allowance on deferred tax assets at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 . at december 31 , 2008 , the company had a u.s . foreign tax-credit carryforward of $ 10.5 billion , $ 0.4 billion whose expiry date is 2016 , $ 5.3 billion whose expiry date is 2017 and $ 4.8 billion whose expiry date is 2018 . the company has a u.s federal consolidated net operating loss ( nol ) carryforward of approximately $ 13 billion whose expiration date is 2028 . the company also has a general business credit carryforward of $ 0.6 billion whose expiration dates are 2027-2028 . the company has state and local net operating loss carryforwards of $ 16.2 billion and $ 4.9 billion in new york state and new york city , respectively . this consists of $ 2.4 billion and $ 1.2 billion , whose expiration date is 2027 and $ 13.8 billion and $ 3.7 billion whose expiration date is 2028 and for which the company has recorded a deferred-tax asset of $ 1.2 billion , along with less significant net operating losses in various other states for which the company has recorded a deferred-tax asset of $ 399 million and which expire between 2012 and 2028 . in addition , the company has recorded deferred-tax assets in apb 23 subsidiaries for foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $ 130 million ( which expires in 2018 ) and $ 101 million ( with no expiration ) . although realization is not assured , the company believes that the realization of the recognized net deferred tax asset of $ 44.5 billion is more likely than not based on expectations as to future taxable income in the jurisdictions in which it operates and available tax planning strategies , as defined in sfas 109 , that could be implemented if necessary to prevent a carryforward from expiring . the company 2019s net deferred tax asset ( dta ) of $ 44.5 billion consists of approximately $ 36.5 billion of net u.s . federal dtas , $ 4 billion of net state dtas and $ 4 billion of net foreign dtas . included in the net federal dta of $ 36.5 billion are deferred tax liabilities of $ 4 billion that will reverse in the relevant carryforward period and may be used to support the dta . the major components of the u.s . federal dta are $ 10.5 billion in foreign tax-credit carryforwards , $ 4.6 billion in a net-operating-loss carryforward , $ 0.6 billion in a general-business-credit carryforward , $ 19.9 billion in net deductions that have not yet been taken on a tax return , and $ 0.9 billion in compensation deductions , which reduced additional paid-in capital in january 2009 and for which sfas 123 ( r ) did not permit any adjustment to such dta at december 31 , 2008 because the related stock compensation was not yet deductible to the company . in general , citigroup would need to generate approximately $ 85 billion of taxable income during the respective carryforward periods to fully realize its federal , state and local dtas. .\nQuestion: what portion of foreign pretax earnings in 2008 were from discontinued operations?\nAnswer: 0.49515\nQuestion: what is the gross interest in 2008?\nAnswer: 70.0\nQuestion: what about the gross uncertain tax position?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "350.0" } ]
CONVFINQA777	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 4214.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>68.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>summer capacity charges</td><td>17.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>base rates</td><td>10.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deferred fuel cost revisions</td><td>-46.3 ( 46.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>price applied to unbilled sales</td><td>-19.3 ( 19.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>-1.2 ( 1.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2004 net revenue</td><td>$ 4244.0</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance resulted primarily from increased usage , partially offset by the effect of milder weather on sales during 2004 compared to 2003 . billed usage increased a total of 2261 gwh in the industrial and commercial sectors . the summer capacity charges variance was due to the amortization in 2003 at entergy gulf states and entergy louisiana of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 . entergy gulf states' amortization began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 . entergy louisiana's amortization began in august 2002 and ended in july 2003 . base rates increased net revenue due to a base rate increase at entergy new orleans that became effective in june 2003 . the deferred fuel cost revisions variance resulted primarily from a revision in 2003 to an unbilled sales pricing estimate to more closely align the fuel component of that pricing with expected recoverable fuel costs at entergy louisiana . deferred fuel cost revisions also decreased net revenue due to a revision in 2004 to the estimate of fuel costs filed for recovery at entergy arkansas in the march 2004 energy cost recovery rider . the price applied to unbilled sales variance resulted from a decrease in fuel price in 2004 caused primarily by the effect of nuclear plant outages in 2003 on average fuel costs . gross operating revenues and regulatory credits gross operating revenues include an increase in fuel cost recovery revenues of $ 475 million and $ 18 million in electric and gas sales , respectively , primarily due to higher fuel rates in 2004 resulting from increases in the market prices of purchased power and natural gas . as such , this revenue increase is offset by increased fuel and purchased power expenses . other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the following : 2022 cessation of the grand gulf accelerated recovery tariff that was suspended in july 2003 ; 2022 the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for summer 2001 power purchases at entergy gulf states and entergy louisiana ; 2022 the deferral in 2004 of $ 14.3 million of capacity charges related to generation resource planning as allowed by the lpsc ; 2022 the deferral in 2004 by entergy louisiana of $ 11.4 million related to the voluntary severance program , in accordance with a proposed stipulation entered into with the lpsc staff ; and .\nQuestion: what is the net revenue in 2004?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4244.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6614	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nkimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued investment in retail store leases 2014 the company has interests in various retail store leases relating to the anchor store premises in neighborhood and community shopping centers . these premises have been sublet to retailers who lease the stores pursuant to net lease agreements . income from the investment in these retail store leases during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , was approximately $ 1.6 million , $ 0.8 million and $ 2.7 million , respectively . these amounts represent sublease revenues during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , of approximately $ 5.9 million , $ 5.2 million and $ 7.1 million , respectively , less related expenses of $ 4.3 million , $ 4.4 million and $ 4.4 million , respectively . the company 2019s future minimum revenues under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant subleases and future minimum obligations through the remaining terms of its retail store leases , assuming no new or renegotiated leases are executed for such premises , for future years are as follows ( in millions ) : 2011 , $ 5.2 and $ 3.4 ; 2012 , $ 4.1 and $ 2.6 ; 2013 , $ 3.8 and $ 2.3 ; 2014 , $ 2.9 and $ 1.7 ; 2015 , $ 2.1 and $ 1.3 , and thereafter , $ 2.8 and $ 1.6 , respectively . leveraged lease 2014 during june 2002 , the company acquired a 90% ( 90 % ) equity participation interest in an existing leveraged lease of 30 properties . the properties are leased under a long-term bond-type net lease whose primary term expires in 2016 , with the lessee having certain renewal option rights . the company 2019s cash equity investment was approximately $ 4.0 million . this equity investment is reported as a net investment in leveraged lease in accordance with the fasb 2019s lease guidance . as of december 31 , 2010 , 18 of these properties were sold , whereby the proceeds from the sales were used to pay down the mortgage debt by approximately $ 31.2 million and the remaining 12 properties were encumbered by third-party non-recourse debt of approximately $ 33.4 million that is scheduled to fully amortize during the primary term of the lease from a portion of the periodic net rents receivable under the net lease . as an equity participant in the leveraged lease , the company has no recourse obligation for principal or interest payments on the debt , which is collateralized by a first mortgage lien on the properties and collateral assignment of the lease . accordingly , this obligation has been offset against the related net rental receivable under the lease . at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the company 2019s net investment in the leveraged lease consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>remaining net rentals</td><td>$ 37.6</td><td>$ 44.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>estimated unguaranteed residual value</td><td>31.7</td><td>31.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-recourse mortgage debt</td><td>-30.1 ( 30.1 )</td><td>-34.5 ( 34.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unearned and deferred income</td><td>-34.2 ( 34.2 )</td><td>-37.0 ( 37.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net investment in leveraged lease</td><td>$ 5.0</td><td>$ 4.3</td></tr></table> 10 . variable interest entities : consolidated operating properties 2014 included within the company 2019s consolidated operating properties at december 31 , 2010 are four consolidated entities that are vies and for which the company is the primary beneficiary . all of these entities have been established to own and operate real estate property . the company 2019s involvement with these entities is through its majority ownership of the properties . these entities were deemed vies primarily based on the fact that the voting rights of the equity investors are not proportional to their obligation to absorb expected losses or receive the expected residual returns of the entity and substantially all of the entity 2019s activities are conducted on behalf of the investor which has disproportionately fewer voting rights . the company determined that it was the primary beneficiary of these vies as a result of its controlling financial interest . during 2010 , the company sold two consolidated vie 2019s which the company was the primary beneficiary. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in value of expenses incurred due to subleasing in 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.1" } ]
CONVFINQA10791	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmasco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) t . other commitments and contingencies litigation . we are subject to claims , charges , litigation and other proceedings in the ordinary course of our business , including those arising from or related to contractual matters , intellectual property , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , construction defect , insurance coverage , personnel and employment disputes and other matters , including class actions . we believe we have adequate defenses in these matters and that the outcome of these matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect on us . however , there is no assurance that we will prevail in these matters , and we could in the future incur judgments , enter into settlements of claims or revise our expectations regarding the outcome of these matters , which could materially impact our results of operations . in july 2012 , the company reached a settlement agreement related to the columbus drywall litigation . the company and its insulation installation companies named in the suit agreed to pay $ 75 million in return for dismissal with prejudice and full release of all claims . the company and its insulation installation companies continue to deny that the challenged conduct was unlawful and admit no wrongdoing as part of the settlement . a settlement was reached to eliminate the considerable expense and uncertainty of this lawsuit . the company recorded the settlement expense in the second quarter of 2012 and the amount was paid in the fourth quarter of 2012 . warranty . at the time of sale , the company accrues a warranty liability for the estimated cost to provide products , parts or services to repair or replace products in satisfaction of warranty obligations . during the third quarter of 2012 , a business in the other specialty products segment recorded a $ 12 million increase in expected future warranty claims resulting from the completion of an analysis prepared by the company based upon its periodic assessment of recent business unit specific operating trends including , among others , home ownership demographics , sales volumes , manufacturing quality , an analysis of recent warranty claim activity and an estimate of current costs to service anticipated claims . changes in the company 2019s warranty liability were as follows , in millions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 107</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accruals for warranties issued during the year</td><td>42</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accruals related to pre-existing warranties</td><td>16</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements made ( in cash or kind ) during the year</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other net ( including currency translation )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 102</td></tr></table> investments . with respect to the company 2019s investments in private equity funds , the company had , at december 31 , 2012 , commitments to contribute up to $ 19 million of additional capital to such funds representing the company 2019s aggregate capital commitment to such funds less capital contributions made to date . the company is contractually obligated to make additional capital contributions to certain of its private equity funds upon receipt of a capital call from the private equity fund . the company has no control over when or if the capital calls will occur . capital calls are funded in cash and generally result in an increase in the carrying value of the company 2019s investment in the private equity fund when paid. .\nQuestion: what is the balance in company 2019s warranty liability at the end of 2012?\nAnswer: 118.0\nQuestion: what about at the end of 2011?\nAnswer: 102.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "16.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10172	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower profit on joint account sales and reduced capacity revenue from the municipal energy agency of mississippi . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 152.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease of $ 43 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in net generation and purchases in excess of decreased net area demand resulting in less energy available for resale sales coupled with a decrease in system agreement remedy receipts . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by decreased demand and decreased recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity costs due to higher rates and increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . there is no material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power management recovery rider . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 466.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base revenue</td><td>7.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>4.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>transmission equalization</td><td>4.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>3.8</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>attala costs</td><td>-10.2 ( 10.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>6.7</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 486.9</td></tr></table> the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in \"state and local rate regulation\" below . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , including the effect of more favorable weather on billed electric sales in 2007 compared to 2006 . billed electricity usage increased 214 gwh . the increase in usage was partially offset by decreased usage in the industrial sector . the transmission revenue variance is due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to a revision made in 2006 of transmission equalization receipts among entergy companies . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a revision in 2006 of reserve equalization payments among entergy companies due to a ferc ruling regarding the inclusion of interruptible loads in reserve .\nQuestion: what was the value of net revenue in 2007?\nAnswer: 486.9\nQuestion: and in 2006?\nAnswer: 466.1\nQuestion: so by how much did this value change over these years?\nAnswer: 20.8\nQuestion: and the percentage change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.04463" } ]
CONVFINQA4462	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 28 , 2012 through october 29 , 2017 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 28 , 2012 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/28/12 in stock or 10/31/12 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>10/28/2012</td><td>10/27/2013</td><td>10/26/2014</td><td>10/25/2015</td><td>10/30/2016</td><td>10/29/2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>applied materials</td><td>100.00</td><td>171.03</td><td>207.01</td><td>165.34</td><td>293.64</td><td>586.91</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>127.18</td><td>149.14</td><td>156.89</td><td>163.97</td><td>202.72</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rdg semiconductor composite index</td><td>100.00</td><td>131.94</td><td>167.25</td><td>160.80</td><td>193.36</td><td>288.96</td></tr></table> dividends during each of fiscal 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.10 per share . applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 10/30/16 10/29/17 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .\nQuestion: what was the price of applied materials in 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "165.34" } ]
CONVFINQA1509	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\non the underlying exposure . for derivative contracts that are designated and qualify as cash fl ow hedges , the effective portion of gains and losses on these contracts is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassifi ed into earnings in the same period the hedged transaction affects earnings . hedge ineffectiveness is immediately recognized in earnings . derivative contracts that are not designated as hedging instruments are recorded at fair value with the gain or loss recognized in current earnings during the period of change . we may enter into foreign currency forward and option contracts to reduce the effect of fl uctuating currency exchange rates ( principally the euro , the british pound , and the japanese yen ) . foreign currency derivatives used for hedging are put in place using the same or like currencies and duration as the underlying exposures . forward contracts are principally used to manage exposures arising from subsidiary trade and loan payables and receivables denominated in foreign currencies . these contracts are recorded at fair value with the gain or loss recognized in other 2014net . the purchased option contracts are used to hedge anticipated foreign currency transactions , primarily intercompany inventory activities expected to occur within the next year . these contracts are designated as cash fl ow hedges of those future transactions and the impact on earnings is included in cost of sales . we may enter into foreign currency forward contracts and currency swaps as fair value hedges of fi rm commitments . forward and option contracts generally have maturities not exceeding 12 months . in the normal course of business , our operations are exposed to fl uctuations in interest rates . these fl uctuations can vary the costs of fi nancing , investing , and operating . we address a portion of these risks through a controlled program of risk management that includes the use of derivative fi nancial instruments . the objective of controlling these risks is to limit the impact of fl uctuations in interest rates on earnings . our primary interest rate risk exposure results from changes in short-term u.s . dollar interest rates . in an effort to manage interest rate exposures , we strive to achieve an acceptable balance between fi xed and fl oating rate debt and investment positions and may enter into interest rate swaps or collars to help maintain that balance . interest rate swaps or collars that convert our fi xed- rate debt or investments to a fl oating rate are designated as fair value hedges of the underlying instruments . interest rate swaps or collars that convert fl oating rate debt or investments to a fi xed rate are designated as cash fl ow hedg- es . interest expense on the debt is adjusted to include the payments made or received under the swap agreements . goodwill and other intangibles : goodwill is not amortized . all other intangibles arising from acquisitions and research alliances have fi nite lives and are amortized over their estimated useful lives , ranging from 5 to 20 years , using the straight-line method . the weighted-average amortization period for developed product technology is approximately 12 years . amortization expense for 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 was $ 193.4 million , $ 172.8 million , and $ 7.6 million before tax , respectively . the estimated amortization expense for each of the fi ve succeeding years approximates $ 280 million before tax , per year . substantially all of the amortization expense is included in cost of sales . see note 3 for further discussion of goodwill and other intangibles acquired in 2008 and 2007 . goodwill and other intangible assets at december 31 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 1167.5</td><td>$ 745.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>developed product technology 2014 gross</td><td>3035.4</td><td>1767.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-346.6 ( 346.6 )</td><td>-162.6 ( 162.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>developed product technology 2014 net</td><td>2688.8</td><td>1604.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other intangibles 2014 gross</td><td>243.2</td><td>142.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-45.4 ( 45.4 )</td><td>-38.0 ( 38.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other intangibles 2014 net</td><td>197.8</td><td>104.8</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total intangibles 2014 net</td><td>$ 4054.1</td><td>$ 2455.4</td></tr></table> goodwill and net other intangibles are reviewed to assess recoverability at least annually and when certain impairment indicators are present . no signifi cant impairments occurred with respect to the carrying value of our goodwill or other intangible assets in 2008 , 2007 , or 2006 . property and equipment : property and equipment is stated on the basis of cost . provisions for depreciation of buildings and equipment are computed generally by the straight-line method at rates based on their estimated useful lives ( 12 to 50 years for buildings and 3 to 18 years for equipment ) . we review the carrying value of long-lived assets for potential impairment on a periodic basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the .\nQuestion: what was the total intangibles 2014 net in 2008?\nAnswer: 4054.1\nQuestion: and what was it in 2007?\nAnswer: 2455.4\nQuestion: by how much, then, did it change over the year?\nAnswer: 1598.7\nQuestion: and what is this change as a percentage of the 2007 amount?\nAnswer: 0.6511\nQuestion: and in this same year, what percent of this amount was comprised of developed product technology-gross?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.71984" } ]
CONVFINQA5701	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) net cash used in investing activities during 2013 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 173.0 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 61.5 related to acquisitions completed during 2013 , net of cash acquired . financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . during 2014 , we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . net cash used in financing activities during 2013 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 600.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) notes . in addition , we repurchased 31.8 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 481.8 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 126.0 on our common stock . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the canadian dollar , brazilian real , australian dollar and the euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 94.1 in 2013 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , japanese yen , and south african rand as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance sheet data</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 1667.2</td><td>$ 1642.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 107.2</td><td>$ 179.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>2.1</td><td>353.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>1623.5</td><td>1129.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 1732.8</td><td>$ 1662.5</td></tr></table> liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all. .\nQuestion: for the two year period ended in 2014, what was the full long-term debt?\nAnswer: 2753.3\nQuestion: and what was the total debt?\nAnswer: 3395.3\nQuestion: how much, then, did the long-term debt represent as a portion of the total?\nAnswer: 0.81092\nQuestion: and what is that in percentage?\nAnswer: 81.09151\nQuestion: for that same two year period, what was the change in that total debt?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "70.3" } ]
CONVFINQA6435	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npackaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2006 4 . stock-based compensation ( continued ) as of december 31 , 2006 , there was $ 8330000 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to the restricted stock awards . the company expects to recognize the cost of these stock awards over a weighted-average period of 2.5 years . 5 . accrued liabilities the components of accrued liabilities are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>december 31 , 2006</td><td>december 31 , 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>bonuses and incentives</td><td>$ 29822</td><td>$ 21895</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>medical insurance and workers 2019 compensation</td><td>18279</td><td>18339</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vacation and holiday pay</td><td>14742</td><td>14159</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>customer volume discounts and rebates</td><td>13777</td><td>13232</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>franchise and property taxes</td><td>8432</td><td>8539</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>payroll and payroll taxes</td><td>5465</td><td>4772</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>9913</td><td>5889</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total</td><td>$ 100430</td><td>$ 86825</td></tr></table> 6 . employee benefit plans and other postretirement benefits in connection with the acquisition from pactiv , pca and pactiv entered into a human resources agreement which , among other items , granted pca employees continued participation in the pactiv pension plan for a period of up to five years following the closing of the acquisition for an agreed upon fee . effective january 1 , 2003 , pca adopted a mirror-image pension plan for eligible hourly employees to succeed the pactiv pension plan in which pca hourly employees had participated though december 31 , 2002 . the pca pension plan for hourly employees recognizes service earned under both the pca plan and the prior pactiv plan . benefits earned under the pca plan are reduced by retirement benefits earned under the pactiv plan through december 31 , 2002 . all assets and liabilities associated with benefits earned through december 31 , 2002 for hourly employees and retirees of pca were retained by the pactiv plan . effective may 1 , 2004 , pca adopted a grandfathered pension plan for certain salaried employees who had previously participated in the pactiv pension plan pursuant to the above mentioned human resource agreement . the benefit formula for the new pca pension plan for salaried employees is comparable to that of the pactiv plan except that the pca plan uses career average base pay in the benefit formula in lieu of final average base pay . the pca pension plan for salaried employees recognizes service earned under both the pca plan and the prior pactiv plan . benefits earned under the pca plan are reduced by retirement benefits earned under the pactiv plan through april 30 , 2004 . all assets and liabilities associated with benefits earned through april 30 , 2004 for salaried employees and retirees of pca were retained by the pactiv plan . pca maintains a supplemental executive retirement plan ( 201cserp 201d ) , which augments pension benefits for eligible executives ( excluding the ceo ) earned under the pca pension plan for salaried employees . benefits are determined using the same formula as the pca pension plan but in addition to counting .\nQuestion: what was the value of payroll and payroll taxes from 2006?\nAnswer: 5465.0\nQuestion: what was the value from 2005?\nAnswer: 4772.0\nQuestion: what is the net change in value?\nAnswer: 693.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.14522" } ]
CONVFINQA3878	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin 2017 , the company granted 440076 shares of restricted class a common stock and 7568 shares of restricted stock units . restricted common stock and restricted stock units generally have a vesting period of two to four years . the fair value related to these grants was $ 58.7 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated basis over the vesting period . dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests . in 2017 , the company also granted 203298 performance shares . the fair value related to these grants was $ 25.3 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated and straight-lined basis over the vesting period . the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated performance or market conditions . the following table summarizes restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares activity for 2017 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of shares</td><td>weightedaveragegrant datefair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2016</td><td>1820578</td><td>$ 98</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>650942</td><td>129</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-510590 ( 510590 )</td><td>87</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cancelled</td><td>-401699 ( 401699 )</td><td>95</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2017</td><td>1559231</td><td>116</td></tr></table> the total fair value of restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares that vested during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 66.0 million , $ 59.8 million and $ 43.3 million , respectively . under the espp , eligible employees may acquire shares of class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration . shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq global select market . compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price . in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , a total of 19936 , 19858 and 19756 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees . these shares are subject to a six-month holding period . annual expense of $ 0.3 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2017 , and $ 0.2 million was recognized in both 2016 and 2015 . non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 100000 . non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 60000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution . as a result , 19736 shares , 26439 shares and 25853 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions . expense of $ 2.5 million , $ 2.4 million and $ 2.5 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. .\nQuestion: in 2017, what was the number of granted performance shares?\nAnswer: 203298.0\nQuestion: and what was the total number of granted shares?\nAnswer: 650942.0\nQuestion: what percentage, then, of this total did that performance shares number represent?\nAnswer: 0.31231\nQuestion: and from 2016 to that year, what was the total of compensation expense attributable to directors?\nAnswer: 4.9\nQuestion: including 2015, what becomes that total of compensation expense?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "7.4" } ]
CONVFINQA3869	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n38 2015 ppg annual report and form 10-k notes to the consolidated financial statements 1 . summary of significant accounting policies principles of consolidation the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ppg industries , inc . ( 201cppg 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) and all subsidiaries , both u.s . and non-u.s. , that it controls . ppg owns more than 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock of most of the subsidiaries that it controls . for those consolidated subsidiaries in which the company 2019s ownership is less than 100% ( 100 % ) , the outside shareholders 2019 interests are shown as noncontrolling interests . investments in companies in which ppg owns 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock and has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . as a result , ppg 2019s share of the earnings or losses of such equity affiliates is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of income and ppg 2019s share of these companies 2019 shareholders 2019 equity is included in 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet . transactions between ppg and its subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation . use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements the preparation of financial statements in conformity with u.s . generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements , as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period . such estimates also include the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed resulting from the allocation of the purchase price related to business combinations consummated . actual outcomes could differ from those estimates . revenue recognition the company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete . revenue from sales is recognized by all operating segments when goods are shipped and title to inventory and risk of loss passes to the customer or when services have been rendered . shipping and handling costs amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are reported in 201cnet sales 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . shipping and handling costs incurred by the company for the delivery of goods to customers are included in 201ccost of sales , exclusive of depreciation and amortization 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income . selling , general and administrative costs amounts presented as 201cselling , general and administrative 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income are comprised of selling , customer service , distribution and advertising costs , as well as the costs of providing corporate- wide functional support in such areas as finance , law , human resources and planning . distribution costs pertain to the movement and storage of finished goods inventory at company- owned and leased warehouses , terminals and other distribution facilities . advertising costs advertising costs are expensed as incurred and totaled $ 324 million , $ 297 million and $ 235 million in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . research and development research and development costs , which consist primarily of employee related costs , are charged to expense as incurred. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>research and development 2013 total</td><td>$ 505</td><td>$ 509</td><td>$ 479</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less depreciation on research facilities</td><td>19</td><td>17</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>research and development net</td><td>$ 486</td><td>$ 492</td><td>$ 463</td></tr></table> legal costs legal costs , primarily include costs associated with acquisition and divestiture transactions , general litigation , environmental regulation compliance , patent and trademark protection and other general corporate purposes , are charged to expense as incurred . foreign currency translation the functional currency of most significant non-u.s . operations is their local currency . assets and liabilities of those operations are translated into u.s . dollars using year-end exchange rates ; income and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates for the reporting period . unrealized foreign currency translation adjustments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss , a separate component of shareholders 2019 equity . cash equivalents cash equivalents are highly liquid investments ( valued at cost , which approximates fair value ) acquired with an original maturity of three months or less . short-term investments short-term investments are highly liquid , high credit quality investments ( valued at cost plus accrued interest ) that have stated maturities of greater than three months to one year . the purchases and sales of these investments are classified as investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows . marketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income , net of tax , for those designated as available for sale securities. .\nQuestion: what was the total of advertising costs in 2015?\nAnswer: 324.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2014?\nAnswer: 297.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the total costs for the two years, combined?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "621.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6667	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents celanese purchases of its equity securities information regarding repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2017 is as follows : period number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program ( 2 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>totalnumberof sharespurchased ( 1 )</td><td>averageprice paidper share</td><td>total numberof sharespurchased aspart of publiclyannounced program</td><td>approximatedollarvalue of sharesremaining thatmay bepurchased underthe program ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31 2017</td><td>10676</td><td>$ 104.10</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 1531000000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30 2017</td><td>924</td><td>$ 104.02</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 1531000000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31 2017</td><td>38605</td><td>$ 106.36</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 1531000000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>50205</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>-</td></tr></table> ___________________________ ( 1 ) represents shares withheld from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes related to the vesting of restricted stock units . ( 2 ) our board of directors has authorized the aggregate repurchase of $ 3.9 billion of our common stock since february 2008 , including an increase of $ 1.5 billion on july 17 , 2017 . see note 17 - stockholders' equity in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information. .\nQuestion: what is the total value of purchased shares during october 2017\nAnswer: 1111371.6\nQuestion: what about in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.11137" } ]
CONVFINQA10146	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nsystem energy resources , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis with syndicated bank letters of credit . in december 2004 , system energy amended these letters of credit and they now expire in may 2009 . system energy may refinance or redeem debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common stock issuances by system energy require prior regulatory approval . debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . system energy has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . system energy has obtained a short-term borrowing authorization from the ferc under which it may borrow , through march 31 , 2010 , up to the aggregate amount , at any one time outstanding , of $ 200 million . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of system energy's short-term borrowing limits . system energy has also obtained an order from the ferc authorizing long-term securities issuances . the current long- term authorization extends through june 2009 . system energy's receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 42915</td><td>$ 53620</td><td>$ 88231</td><td>$ 277287</td></tr></table> in may 2007 , $ 22.5 million of system energy's receivable from the money pool was replaced by a note receivable from entergy new orleans . see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . nuclear matters system energy owns and operates grand gulf . system energy is , therefore , subject to the risks related to owning and operating a nuclear plant . these include risks from the use , storage , handling and disposal of high-level and low-level radioactive materials , regulatory requirement changes , including changes resulting from events at other plants , limitations on the amounts and types of insurance commercially available for losses in connection with nuclear operations , and technological and financial uncertainties related to decommissioning nuclear plants at the end of their licensed lives , including the sufficiency of funds in decommissioning trusts . in the event of an unanticipated early shutdown of grand gulf , system energy may be required to provide additional funds or credit support to satisfy regulatory requirements for decommissioning . environmental risks system energy's facilities and operations are subject to regulation by various governmental authorities having jurisdiction over air quality , water quality , control of toxic substances and hazardous and solid wastes , and other environmental matters . management believes that system energy is in substantial compliance with environmental regulations currently applicable to its facilities and operations . because environmental regulations are subject to change , future compliance costs cannot be precisely estimated . critical accounting estimates the preparation of system energy's financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to apply appropriate accounting policies and to make estimates and judgments that .\nQuestion: in 2007, what amount of system energy's receivable from the money pool was replaced by a note receivable from entergy new orleans?\nAnswer: 22.5\nQuestion: and how much is that in thousands of dollars?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "22500.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2070	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nconsolidated 2005 results of operations was an estimated reduction of gross profit and a corresponding decrease to inventory , at cost , of $ 5.2 million . store pre-opening costs pre-opening costs related to new store openings and the construction periods are expensed as incurred . property and equipment property and equipment are recorded at cost . the company provides for depreciation and amortization on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>land improvements</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>buildings</td><td>39-40</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>furniture fixtures and equipment</td><td>3-10</td></tr></table> improvements of leased properties are amortized over the shorter of the life of the applicable lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset . impairment of long-lived assets when indicators of impairment are present , the company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets , other than goodwill , in relation to the operating performance and future cash flows or the appraised values of the underlying assets . in accordance with sfas 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets , 201d the company reviews for impairment stores open more than two years for which current cash flows from operations are negative . impairment results when the carrying value of the assets exceeds the undiscounted future cash flows over the life of the lease . the company 2019s estimate of undiscounted future cash flows over the lease term is based upon historical operations of the stores and estimates of future store profitability which encompasses many factors that are subject to variability and difficult to predict . if a long-lived asset is found to be impaired , the amount recognized for impairment is equal to the difference between the carrying value and the asset 2019s fair value . the fair value is estimated based primarily upon future cash flows ( discounted at the company 2019s credit adjusted risk-free rate ) or other reasonable estimates of fair market value . assets to be disposed of are adjusted to the fair value less the cost to sell if less than the book value . the company recorded impairment charges , included in sg&a expense , of approximately $ 9.4 million in 2006 , $ 0.6 million in 2005 and $ 0.2 million in 2004 to reduce the carrying value of certain of its stores 2019 assets as deemed necessary due to negative sales trends and cash flows at these locations . the majority of the 2006 charges were recorded pursuant to certain strategic initiatives discussed in note 2 . other assets other assets consist primarily of long-term investments , qualifying prepaid expenses , debt issuance costs which are amortized over the life of the related obligations , utility and security deposits , life insurance policies and goodwill. .\nQuestion: what was the total amount in impairment charges recorded in the year of 2006, in millions?\nAnswer: 9.4\nQuestion: and what was that of 2005, also in millions??\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.6" } ]
CONVFINQA6594	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nconstruction of cvn-79 john f . kennedy , construction of the u.s . coast guard 2019s fifth national security cutter ( unnamed ) , advance planning efforts for the cvn-72 uss abraham lincoln rcoh , and continued execution of the cvn-71 uss theodore roosevelt rcoh . 2010 2014the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , was approximately $ 3.6 billion . significant new awards during this period included $ 480 million for the construction of the u.s . coast guard 2019s fourth national security cutter hamilton , $ 480 million for design and long-lead material procurement activities for the cvn-79 john f . kennedy aircraft carrier , $ 377 million for cvn-78 gerald r . ford , $ 224 million for lha-7 ( unnamed ) , $ 184 million for lpd-26 john p . murtha , $ 114 million for ddg-114 ralph johnson and $ 62 million for long-lead material procurement activities for lpd-27 ( unnamed ) . liquidity and capital resources we endeavor to ensure the most efficient conversion of operating results into cash for deployment in operating our businesses and maximizing stockholder value . we use various financial measures to assist in capital deployment decision making , including net cash provided by operating activities and free cash flow . we believe these measures are useful to investors in assessing our financial performance . the table below summarizes key components of cash flow provided by ( used in ) operating activities: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>year ended december 31 2011</td><td>year ended december 31 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>$ -94 ( 94 )</td><td>$ 135</td><td>$ 124</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill impairment</td><td>290</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>deferred income taxes</td><td>27</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td><td>-98 ( 98 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>depreciation and amortization</td><td>190</td><td>183</td><td>186</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>stock-based compensation</td><td>42</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>retiree benefit funding less than ( in excess of ) expense</td><td>122</td><td>33</td><td>-28 ( 28 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>trade working capital decrease ( increase )</td><td>-49 ( 49 )</td><td>27</td><td>-272 ( 272 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net cash provided by ( used in ) operating activities</td><td>$ 528</td><td>$ 359</td><td>$ -88 ( 88 )</td></tr></table> cash flows we discuss below our major operating , investing and financing activities for each of the three years in the period ended december 31 , 2011 , as classified on our consolidated statements of cash flows . operating activities 2011 2014cash provided by operating activities was $ 528 million in 2011 compared with $ 359 million in 2010 . the increase of $ 169 million was due principally to increased earnings net of impairment charges and lower pension contributions , offset by an increase in trade working capital . net cash paid by northrop grumman on our behalf for u.s . federal income tax obligations was $ 53 million . we expect cash generated from operations for 2012 to be sufficient to service debt , meet contract obligations , and finance capital expenditures . although 2012 cash from operations is expected to be sufficient to service these obligations , we may from time to time borrow funds under our credit facility to accommodate timing differences in cash flows . 2010 2014net cash provided by operating activities was $ 359 million in 2010 compared with cash used of $ 88 million in 2009 . the change of $ 447 million was due principally to a decrease in discretionary pension contributions of $ 97 million , a decrease in trade working capital of $ 299 million , and a decrease in deferred income taxes of $ 79 million . in 2009 , trade working capital balances included the unfavorable impact of delayed customer billings associated with the negative performance adjustments on the lpd-22 through lpd-25 contract due to projected cost increases at completion . see note 7 : contract charges in item 8 . the change in deferred taxes was due principally to the timing of contract related deductions . u.s . federal income tax payments made by northrop grumman on our behalf were $ 89 million in 2010. .\nQuestion: what is the net cash flow by operating activities in 2010?\nAnswer: 359.0\nQuestion: what about in 2009?\nAnswer: -88.0\nQuestion: what is the difference among these years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "447.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8122	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 110 jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report the allowance for credit losses increased $ 13.7 billion from the prior year to $ 23.8 billion . the increase included $ 4.1 billion of allowance related to noncredit-impaired loans acquired in the washington mutual transaction and the related accounting conformity provision . excluding held-for-sale loans , loans carried at fair value , and pur- chased credit-impaired consumer loans , the allowance for loan losses represented 3.62% ( 3.62 % ) of loans at december 31 , 2008 , compared with 1.88% ( 1.88 % ) at december 31 , 2007 . the consumer allowance for loan losses increased $ 10.5 billion from the prior year as a result of the washington mutual transaction and increased allowance for loan loss in residential real estate and credit card . the increase included additions to the allowance for loan losses of $ 4.7 billion driven by higher estimated losses for residential mort- gage and home equity loans as the weak labor market and weak overall economic conditions have resulted in increased delinquencies , while continued weak housing prices have driven a significant increase in loss severity . the allowance for loan losses related to credit card increased $ 4.3 billion from the prior year primarily due to the acquired allowance and subsequent conforming provision for loan loss related to the washington mutual bank acquisition and an increase in provision for loan losses of $ 2.3 billion in 2008 over 2007 , as higher estimated net charge-offs are expected in the port- folio resulting from the current economic conditions . the wholesale allowance for loan losses increase of $ 3.4 billion from december 31 , 2007 , reflected the effect of a weakening credit envi- ronment and the transfer of $ 4.9 billion of funded and unfunded leveraged lending commitments to retained loans from held-for-sale . to provide for the risk of loss inherent in the firm 2019s process of extending credit , an allowance for lending-related commitments is held for both wholesale and consumer , which is reported in other lia- bilities . the wholesale component is computed using a methodology similar to that used for the wholesale loan portfolio , modified for expected maturities and probabilities of drawdown and has an asset- specific component and a formula-based component . for a further discussion on the allowance for lending-related commitment see note 15 on pages 178 2013180 of this annual report . the allowance for lending-related commitments for both wholesale and consumer was $ 659 million and $ 850 million at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the decrease reflects the reduction in lending-related commitments at december 31 , 2008 . for more information , see page 102 of this annual report . the following table presents the allowance for loan losses and net charge-offs ( recoveries ) by business segment at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 . net charge-offs ( recoveries ) december 31 , allowance for loan losses year ended . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 , ( in millions )</td><td>december 31 , 2008</td><td>december 31 , 2007</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>investment bank</td><td>$ 3444</td><td>$ 1329</td><td>$ 105</td><td>$ 36</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>commercial banking</td><td>2826</td><td>1695</td><td>288</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>treasury & securities services</td><td>74</td><td>18</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>asset management</td><td>191</td><td>112</td><td>11</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>corporate/private equity</td><td>10</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total wholesale</td><td>6545</td><td>3154</td><td>402</td><td>72</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>retail financial services</td><td>8918</td><td>2668</td><td>4877</td><td>1350</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>card services</td><td>7692</td><td>3407</td><td>4556</td><td>3116</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>corporate/private equity</td><td>9</td><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total consumer 2013 reported</td><td>16619</td><td>6080</td><td>9433</td><td>4466</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>credit card 2013 securitized</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>3612</td><td>2380</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>total consumer 2013 managed</td><td>16619</td><td>6080</td><td>13045</td><td>6846</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>total</td><td>$ 23164</td><td>$ 9234</td><td>$ 13477</td><td>$ 6918</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what were the net charge-offs for retail financial services in 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "8918.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6360	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnew term loan a facility , with the remaining unpaid principal amount of loans under the new term loan a facility due and payable in full at maturity on june 6 , 2021 . principal amounts outstanding under the new revolving loan facility are due and payable in full at maturity on june 6 , 2021 , subject to earlier repayment pursuant to the springing maturity date described above . in addition to paying interest on outstanding principal under the borrowings , we are obligated to pay a quarterly commitment fee at a rate determined by reference to a total leverage ratio , with a maximum commitment fee of 40% ( 40 % ) of the applicable margin for eurocurrency loans . in july 2016 , breakaway four , ltd. , as borrower , and nclc , as guarantor , entered into a supplemental agreement , which amended the breakaway four loan to , among other things , increase the aggregate principal amount of commitments under the multi-draw term loan credit facility from 20ac590.5 million to 20ac729.9 million . in june 2016 , we took delivery of seven seas explorer . to finance the payment due upon delivery , we had export credit financing in place for 80% ( 80 % ) of the contract price . the associated $ 373.6 million term loan bears interest at 3.43% ( 3.43 % ) with a maturity date of june 30 , 2028 . principal and interest payments shall be paid semiannually . in december 2016 , nclc issued $ 700.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) senior unsecured notes due december 2021 ( the 201cnotes 201d ) in a private offering ( the 201coffering 201d ) at par . nclc used the net proceeds from the offering , after deducting the initial purchasers 2019 discount and estimated fees and expenses , together with cash on hand , to purchase its outstanding 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) senior notes due 2019 having an aggregate outstanding principal amount of $ 680 million . the redemption of the 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) senior notes due 2019 was completed in january 2017 . nclc will pay interest on the notes at 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) per annum , semiannually on june 15 and december 15 of each year , commencing on june 15 , 2017 , to holders of record at the close of business on the immediately preceding june 1 and december 1 , respectively . nclc may redeem the notes , in whole or part , at any time prior to december 15 , 2018 , at a price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but not including , the redemption date and a 201cmake-whole premium . 201d nclc may redeem the notes , in whole or in part , on or after december 15 , 2018 , at the redemption prices set forth in the indenture governing the notes . at any time ( which may be more than once ) on or prior to december 15 , 2018 , nclc may choose to redeem up to 40% ( 40 % ) of the aggregate principal amount of the notes at a redemption price equal to 104.750% ( 104.750 % ) of the face amount thereof with an amount equal to the net proceeds of one or more equity offerings , so long as at least 60% ( 60 % ) of the aggregate principal amount of the notes issued remains outstanding following such redemption . the indenture governing the notes contains covenants that limit nclc 2019s ability ( and its restricted subsidiaries 2019 ability ) to , among other things : ( i ) incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue certain preferred shares ; ( ii ) pay dividends and make certain other restricted payments ; ( iii ) create restrictions on the payment of dividends or other distributions to nclc from its restricted subsidiaries ; ( iv ) create liens on certain assets to secure debt ; ( v ) make certain investments ; ( vi ) engage in transactions with affiliates ; ( vii ) engage in sales of assets and subsidiary stock ; and ( viii ) transfer all or substantially all of its assets or enter into merger or consolidation transactions . the indenture governing the notes also provides for events of default , which , if any of them occurs , would permit or require the principal , premium ( if any ) , interest and other monetary obligations on all of the then-outstanding notes to become due and payable immediately . interest expense , net for the year ended december 31 , 2016 was $ 276.9 million which included $ 34.7 million of amortization of deferred financing fees and a $ 27.7 million loss on extinguishment of debt . interest expense , net for the year ended december 31 , 2015 was $ 221.9 million which included $ 36.7 million of amortization of deferred financing fees and a $ 12.7 million loss on extinguishment of debt . interest expense , net for the year ended december 31 , 2014 was $ 151.8 million which included $ 32.3 million of amortization of deferred financing fees and $ 15.4 million of expenses related to financing transactions in connection with the acquisition of prestige . certain of our debt agreements contain covenants that , among other things , require us to maintain a minimum level of liquidity , as well as limit our net funded debt-to-capital ratio , maintain certain other ratios and restrict our ability to pay dividends . substantially all of our ships and other property and equipment are pledged as collateral for certain of our debt . we believe we were in compliance with these covenants as of december 31 , 2016 . the following are scheduled principal repayments on long-term debt including capital lease obligations as of december 31 , 2016 for each of the next five years ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 560193</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>554846</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>561687</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>1153733</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2021</td><td>2193823</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1490322</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 6514604</td></tr></table> we had an accrued interest liability of $ 32.5 million and $ 34.2 million as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the value that can be deducted from future income tax due to amortization in 2016?\nAnswer: 34.7\nQuestion: what was the value in 2015?\nAnswer: 36.7\nQuestion: what is the sum of those years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "71.4" } ]
CONVFINQA907	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe analysis of our depreciation studies . changes in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively . under group depreciation , the historical cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized . the historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using ( i ) inflation indices published by the bureau of labor statistics and ( ii ) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies . the indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes . because of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired , we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate . in addition , we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient ( or in excess ) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies . any deficiency ( or excess ) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets . for retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business , a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions : ( i ) is unusual , ( ii ) is material in amount , and ( iii ) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies . a gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations . when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use . however , many of our assets are self-constructed . a large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties , which is typically performed by our employees , and for track line expansion and other capacity projects . costs that are directly attributable to capital projects ( including overhead costs ) are capitalized . direct costs that are capitalized as part of self- constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment . indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset . general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred . normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized . these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases . total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.3 billion for 2013 , $ 2.1 billion for 2012 , and $ 2.2 billion for 2011 . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 12 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions 2013 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>dec . 31 2013</td><td>dec . 312012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>$ 803</td><td>$ 825</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income and other taxes payable</td><td>491</td><td>368</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accrued wages and vacation</td><td>385</td><td>376</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dividends payable</td><td>356</td><td>318</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accrued casualty costs</td><td>207</td><td>213</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>interest payable</td><td>169</td><td>172</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>equipment rents payable</td><td>96</td><td>95</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>579</td><td>556</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities</td><td>$ 3086</td><td>$ 2923</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the value of total accounts payable and other current liabilities in 2013?\nAnswer: 3086.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2923.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4946	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the expenses related to the voluntary severance program offered to employees . approximately 200 employees from the non-utility nuclear business and 150 employees in the utility business accepted the voluntary severance program offers . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 4618</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 4589</td></tr></table> the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher capacity charges . a portion of the variance is due to the amortization of deferred capacity costs and is offset in base revenues due to base rate increases implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather compared to the same period in 2007 and decreased electricity usage primarily during the unbilled sales period . hurricane gustav and hurricane ike , which hit the utility's service territories in september 2008 , contributed an estimated $ 46 million to the decrease in electricity usage . industrial sales were also depressed by the continuing effects of the hurricanes and , especially in the latter part of the year , because of the overall decline of the economy , leading to lower usage in the latter part of the year affecting both the large customer industrial segment as well as small and mid-sized industrial customers . the decreases in electricity usage were partially offset by an increase in residential and commercial customer electricity usage that occurred during the periods of the year not affected by the hurricanes . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : an increase in the attala power plant costs recovered through the power management rider by entergy mississippi . the net income effect of this recovery is limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with the remainder offset by attala power plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes ; a storm damage rider that became effective in october 2007 at entergy mississippi ; and an energy efficiency rider that became effective in november 2007 at entergy arkansas . the establishment of the storm damage rider and the energy efficiency rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense with no impact on net income . the retail electric price variance was partially offset by : the absence of interim storm recoveries through the formula rate plans at entergy louisiana and entergy gulf states louisiana which ceased upon the act 55 financing of storm costs in the third quarter 2008 ; and a credit passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financings . refer to \"liquidity and capital resources - hurricane katrina and hurricane rita\" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs and the act 55 storm cost financings. .\nQuestion: what was the net change in value of net revenue during 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-29.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6084	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n74 2012 ppg annual report and form 10-k 25 . separation and merger transaction on january , 28 , 2013 , the company completed the previously announced separation of its commodity chemicals business and merger of its wholly-owned subsidiary , eagle spinco inc. , with a subsidiary of georgia gulf corporation in a tax efficient reverse morris trust transaction ( the 201ctransaction 201d ) . pursuant to the merger , eagle spinco , the entity holding ppg's former commodity chemicals business , is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of georgia gulf . the closing of the merger followed the expiration of the related exchange offer and the satisfaction of certain other conditions . the combined company formed by uniting georgia gulf with ppg's former commodity chemicals business is named axiall corporation ( 201caxiall 201d ) . ppg holds no ownership interest in axiall . ppg received the necessary ruling from the internal revenue service and as a result this transaction was generally tax free to ppg and its shareholders . under the terms of the exchange offer , 35249104 shares of eagle spinco common stock were available for distribution in exchange for shares of ppg common stock accepted in the offer . following the merger , each share of eagle spinco common stock automatically converted into the right to receive one share of axiall corporation common stock . accordingly , ppg shareholders who tendered their shares of ppg common stock as part of this offer received 3.2562 shares of axiall common stock for each share of ppg common stock accepted for exchange . ppg was able to accept the maximum of 10825227 shares of ppg common stock for exchange in the offer , and thereby , reduced its outstanding shares by approximately 7% ( 7 % ) . under the terms of the transaction , ppg received $ 900 million of cash and 35.2 million shares of axiall common stock ( market value of $ 1.8 billion on january 25 , 2013 ) which was distributed to ppg shareholders by the exchange offer as described above . the cash consideration is subject to customary post-closing adjustment , including a working capital adjustment . in the transaction , ppg transferred environmental remediation liabilities , defined benefit pension plan assets and liabilities and other post-employment benefit liabilities related to the commodity chemicals business to axiall . ppg will report a gain on the transaction reflecting the excess of the sum of the cash proceeds received and the cost ( closing stock price on january 25 , 2013 ) of the ppg shares tendered and accepted in the exchange for the 35.2 million shares of axiall common stock over the net book value of the net assets of ppg's former commodity chemicals business . the transaction will also result in a net partial settlement loss associated with the spin out and termination of defined benefit pension liabilities and the transfer of other post-retirement benefit liabilities under the terms of the transaction . during 2012 , the company incurred $ 21 million of pretax expense , primarily for professional services , related to the transaction . additional transaction-related expenses will be incurred in 2013 . ppg will report the results of its commodity chemicals business for january 2013 and a net gain on the transaction as results from discontinued operations when it reports its results for the quarter ending march 31 , 2013 . in the ppg results for prior periods , presented for comparative purposes beginning with the first quarter 2013 , the results of its former commodity chemicals business will be reclassified from continuing operations and presented as the results from discontinued operations . the net sales and income before income taxes of the commodity chemicals business that will be reclassified and reported as discontinued operations are presented in the table below for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>year-ended 2012</td><td>year-ended 2011</td><td>year-ended 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 1700</td><td>$ 1741</td><td>$ 1441</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income before income taxes</td><td>$ 368</td><td>$ 376</td><td>$ 187</td></tr></table> income before income taxes for the year ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 is $ 4 million lower , $ 6 million higher and $ 2 million lower , respectively , than segment earnings for the ppg commodity chemicals segment reported for these periods . these differences are due to the inclusion of certain gains , losses and expenses associated with the chlor-alkali and derivatives business that were not reported in the ppg commodity chemicals segment earnings in accordance with the accounting guidance on segment reporting . table of contents notes to the consolidated financial statements .\nQuestion: what was the net change in value of net sales of the commodity chemicals business that will be reclassified and reported as discontinued operations from 2010 to 2011?\nAnswer: 300.0\nQuestion: what was the 2011 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1441.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3109	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents interest expense , net of capitalized interest increased $ 64 million , or 9.8% ( 9.8 % ) , to $ 710 million in 2013 from $ 646 million in 2012 primarily due to special charges of $ 92 million to recognize post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations pursuant to the plan and penalty interest related to 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) secured notes and 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes . other nonoperating expense , net of $ 84 million in 2013 consists principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 55 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 48 million . other nonoperating income in 2012 consisted principally of a $ 280 million special credit related to the settlement of a commercial dispute partially offset by net foreign currency losses . reorganization items , net reorganization items refer to revenues , expenses ( including professional fees ) , realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred as a direct result of the chapter 11 cases . the following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items , net on american 2019s consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension and postretirement benefits</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -66 ( 66 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>labor-related deemed claim ( 1 )</td><td>1733</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>320</td><td>1951</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fair value of conversion discount ( 4 )</td><td>218</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>professional fees</td><td>199</td><td>227</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>170</td><td>67</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total reorganization items net</td><td>$ 2640</td><td>$ 2179</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in exchange for employees 2019 contributions to the successful reorganization , including agreeing to reductions in pay and benefits , american agreed in the plan to provide each employee group a deemed claim , which was used to provide a distribution of a portion of the equity of the reorganized entity to those employees . each employee group received a deemed claim amount based upon a portion of the value of cost savings provided by that group through reductions to pay and benefits as well as through certain work rule changes . the total value of this deemed claim was approximately $ 1.7 billion . ( 2 ) amounts include allowed claims ( claims approved by the bankruptcy court ) and estimated allowed claims relating to ( i ) the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft and ( ii ) entry of orders treated as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds . the debtors recorded an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing or facility agreement when the applicable motion was filed with the bankruptcy court to reject or modify such financing or facility agreement and the debtors believed that it was probable the motion would be approved , and there was sufficient information to estimate the claim . see note 2 to american 2019s consolidated financial statements in part ii , item 8b for further information . ( 3 ) pursuant to the plan , the debtors agreed to allow certain post-petition unsecured claims on obligations . as a result , during the year ended december 31 , 2013 , american recorded reorganization charges to adjust estimated allowed claim amounts previously recorded on rejected special facility revenue bonds of $ 180 million , allowed general unsecured claims related to the 1990 and 1994 series of special facility revenue bonds that financed certain improvements at jfk , and rejected bonds that financed certain improvements at ord , which are included in the table above . ( 4 ) the plan allowed unsecured creditors receiving aag series a preferred stock a conversion discount of 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) . accordingly , american recorded the fair value of such discount upon the confirmation of the plan by the bankruptcy court. .\nQuestion: what was the value of total re-organization costs in 2013?\nAnswer: 2640.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2179.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4696	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfair value of financial instruments : the company 2019s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents , marketable securities , accounts receivable , certain investments , accounts payable , borrowings , and derivative contracts . the fair values of cash and cash equivalents , accounts receivable , accounts payable , and short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt approximated carrying values because of the short-term nature of these instruments . available-for-sale marketable securities and investments , in addition to certain derivative instruments , are recorded at fair values as indicated in the preceding disclosures . for its long-term debt the company utilized third-party quotes to estimate fair values ( classified as level 2 ) . information with respect to the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of these financial instruments follow: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>december 31 2012 carrying value</td><td>december 31 2012 fair value</td><td>december 31 2012 carrying value</td><td>fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt excluding current portion</td><td>$ 4916</td><td>$ 5363</td><td>$ 4484</td><td>$ 5002</td></tr></table> the fair values reflected above consider the terms of the related debt absent the impacts of derivative/hedging activity . the carrying amount of long-term debt referenced above is impacted by certain fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps that are designated as fair value hedges and by the designation of fixed rate eurobond securities issued by the company as hedging instruments of the company 2019s net investment in its european subsidiaries . 3m 2019s fixed-rate bonds were trading at a premium at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 due to the low interest rates and tightening of 3m 2019s credit spreads. .\nQuestion: what was the carrying value of long-term debt excluding current portion at the end of 2012?\nAnswer: 4916.0\nQuestion: what was the fair value of long-term debt excluding current portion at the end of 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4484.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1510	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents ( 4 ) the decline in cash flows was driven by the timing of inventory purchases at the end of 2014 versus 2013 . in order to manage our working capital and operating cash needs , we monitor our cash conversion cycle , defined as days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable plus days of supply in inventory minus days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable , based on a rolling three-month average . components of our cash conversion cycle are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in days )</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>days of sales outstanding ( dso ) ( 1 )</td><td>48</td><td>42</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>days of supply in inventory ( dio ) ( 2 )</td><td>13</td><td>13</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>days of purchases outstanding ( dpo ) ( 3 )</td><td>-40 ( 40 )</td><td>-34 ( 34 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>cash conversion cycle</td><td>21</td><td>21</td><td>23</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of trade accounts receivable , net at the end of the period divided by average daily net sales for the same three-month period . also incorporates components of other miscellaneous receivables . ( 2 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the balance of merchandise inventory at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . ( 3 ) represents the rolling three-month average of the combined balance of accounts payable-trade , excluding cash overdrafts , and accounts payable-inventory financing at the end of the period divided by average daily cost of goods sold for the same three-month period . the cash conversion cycle remained at 21 days at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 . the increase in dso was primarily driven by a higher accounts receivable balance at december 31 , 2015 driven by higher public segment sales where customers generally take longer to pay than customers in our corporate segment , slower government payments in certain states due to budget issues and an increase in net sales and related accounts receivable for third-party services such as software assurance and warranties . these services have an unfavorable impact on dso as the receivable is recognized on the balance sheet on a gross basis while the corresponding sales amount in the statement of operations is recorded on a net basis . these services have a favorable impact on dpo as the payable is recognized on the balance sheet without a corresponding cost of sale in the statement of operations because the cost paid to the vendor or third-party service provider is recorded as a reduction to net sales . in addition to the impact of these services on dpo , dpo also increased due to the mix of payables with certain vendors that have longer payment terms . the cash conversion cycle decreased to 21 days at december 31 , 2014 compared to 23 days at december 31 , 2013 , primarily driven by improvement in dso . the decline in dso was primarily driven by improved collections and early payments from certain customers . additionally , the timing of inventory receipts at the end of 2014 had a favorable impact on dio and an unfavorable impact on dpo . investing activities net cash used in investing activities increased $ 189.6 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily due to the completion of the acquisition of kelway by purchasing the remaining 65% ( 65 % ) of its outstanding common stock on august 1 , 2015 . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 35.1 million to $ 90.1 million from $ 55.0 million for 2015 and 2014 , respectively , primarily for our new office location and an increase in spending related to improvements to our information technology systems . net cash used in investing activities increased $ 117.7 million in 2014 compared to 2013 . we paid $ 86.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2014 to acquire a 35% ( 35 % ) non-controlling interest in kelway . additionally , capital expenditures increased $ 7.9 million to $ 55.0 million from $ 47.1 million in 2014 and 2013 , respectively , primarily for improvements to our information technology systems during both years . financing activities net cash used in financing activities increased $ 114.5 million in 2015 compared to 2014 . the increase was primarily driven by share repurchases during the year ended december 31 , 2015 which resulted in an increase in cash used for financing activities of $ 241.3 million . for more information on our share repurchase program , see item 5 , 201cmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . 201d the increase was partially offset by the changes in accounts payable-inventory financing , which resulted in an increase in cash provided for financing activities of $ 20.4 million , and the net impact of our debt transactions which resulted in cash outflows of $ 7.1 million and $ 145.9 million during the years .\nQuestion: what was the number of day of sales outstanding in 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "48.0" } ]
CONVFINQA841	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nshareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five- year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2008 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2008 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 81 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 17 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 19 real estate companies and 23 banking companies . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s. , and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>state street corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 105</td><td>$ 125</td><td>$ 198</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>126</td><td>146</td><td>149</td><td>172</td><td>228</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100</td><td>117</td><td>132</td><td>109</td><td>141</td><td>191</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100</td><td>98</td><td>121</td><td>93</td><td>122</td><td>168</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the state street corporation value in 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "198.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5577	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n18 2015 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2015 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>jkhy</td><td>100.00</td><td>127.44</td><td>148.62</td><td>205.60</td><td>263.21</td><td>290.88</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>peer group</td><td>100.00</td><td>136.78</td><td>148.10</td><td>174.79</td><td>239.10</td><td>301.34</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>130.69</td><td>137.81</td><td>166.20</td><td>207.10</td><td>222.47</td></tr></table> this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2010 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , heartland payment systems , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. . micros systems , inc . was removed from the peer group as it was acquired in september 2014. .\nQuestion: what was the value of the jkhy stock in 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "127.44" } ]
CONVFINQA10648	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) pro forma disclosure 2014the company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of sfas no . 123 , as amended by sfas no . 148 , and has presented such disclosure in note 1 . the 201cfair value 201d of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model . the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted during 2004 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 7.05 , $ 6.32 , and $ 2.23 per share , respectively . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>approximate risk-free interest rate</td><td>4.23% ( 4.23 % )</td><td>4.00% ( 4.00 % )</td><td>4.53% ( 4.53 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected life of option grants</td><td>4 years</td><td>4 years</td><td>5 years</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility of underlying stock ( the company plan )</td><td>80.6% ( 80.6 % )</td><td>86.6% ( 86.6 % )</td><td>92.3% ( 92.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected volatility of underlying stock ( atc mexico and atc south america plans )</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>expected dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> voluntary option exchanges 2014in february 2004 , the company issued to eligible employees 1032717 options with an exercise price of $ 11.19 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant . these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in august 2003 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options ( having an exercise price of $ 10.25 or greater ) to purchase 1831981 shares of its class a common stock . the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding the company 2019s executive officers and its directors , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option . no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date . in may 2002 , the company issued to eligible employees 2027612 options with an exercise price of $ 3.84 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant . these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in october 2001 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options to purchase 3471211 shares of its class a common stock . the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding most of the company 2019s executive officers , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option . no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date . atc mexico holding stock option plan 2014the company maintains a stock option plan in its atc mexico subsidiary ( atc mexico plan ) . the atc mexico plan provides for the issuance of options to officers , employees , directors and consultants of atc mexico . the atc mexico plan limits the number of shares of common stock which may be granted to an aggregate of 360 shares , subject to adjustment based on changes in atc mexico 2019s capital structure . during 2002 , atc mexico granted options to purchase 318 shares of atc mexico common stock to officers and employees . such options were issued at one time with an exercise price of $ 10000 per share . the exercise price per share was at fair market value as determined by the board of directors with the assistance of an independent appraisal performed at the company 2019s request . the fair value of atc mexico plan options granted during 2002 were $ 3611 per share as determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model . as described in note 10 , all outstanding options were exercised in march 2004 . no options under the atc mexico plan were granted in 2004 or 2003 , or exercised or cancelled in 2003 or 2002 , and no options were exercisable as of december 31 , 2003 or 2002 . ( see note 10. ) .\nQuestion: what is the the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted in 2003?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "6.32" } ]
CONVFINQA7920	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncustomary conditions . we will retain a 20% ( 20 % ) equity interest in the joint venture . as of december 31 , 2008 , the joint venture has acquired seven properties from us and we received year-to-date net sale proceeds and financing distributions of approximately $ 251.6 million . in january 2008 , we sold a tract of land to an unconsolidated joint venture in which we hold a 50% ( 50 % ) equity interest and received a distribution , commensurate to our partner 2019s 50% ( 50 % ) ownership interest , of approximately $ 38.3 million . in november 2008 , that unconsolidated joint venture entered a loan agreement with a consortium of banks and distributed a portion of the loan proceeds to us and our partner , with our share of the distribution totaling $ 20.4 million . uses of liquidity our principal uses of liquidity include the following : 2022 property investment ; 2022 recurring leasing/capital costs ; 2022 dividends and distributions to shareholders and unitholders ; 2022 long-term debt maturities ; 2022 opportunistic repurchases of outstanding debt ; and 2022 other contractual obligations . property investment we evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon market outlook , supply and long-term growth potential . our ability to make future property investments is dependent upon our continued access to our longer-term sources of liquidity including the issuances of debt or equity securities as well as disposing of selected properties . in light of current economic conditions , management continues to evaluate our investment priorities and we are limiting new development expenditures . recurring expenditures one of our principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the recurring leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following is a summary of our recurring capital expenditures for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>recurring tenant improvements</td><td>$ 36885</td><td>$ 45296</td><td>$ 41895</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>recurring leasing costs</td><td>28205</td><td>32238</td><td>32983</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>building improvements</td><td>9724</td><td>8402</td><td>8122</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>totals</td><td>$ 74814</td><td>$ 85936</td><td>$ 83000</td></tr></table> dividends and distributions in order to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes , we must currently distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our taxable income to shareholders . because depreciation is a non-cash expense , cash flow will typically be greater than operating income . we paid dividends per share of $ 1.93 , $ 1.91 and $ 1.89 for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . we expect to continue to distribute taxable earnings to meet the requirements to maintain our reit status . however , distributions are declared at the discretion of our board of directors and are subject to actual cash available for distribution , our financial condition , capital requirements and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant . in january 2009 , our board of directors resolved to decrease our annual dividend from $ 1.94 per share to $ 1.00 per share in order to retain additional cash to help meet our capital needs . we anticipate retaining additional cash of approximately $ 145.2 million per year , when compared to an annual dividend of $ 1.94 per share , as the result of this action . at december 31 , 2008 we had six series of preferred shares outstanding . the annual dividend rates on our preferred shares range between 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) and are paid in arrears quarterly. .\nQuestion: what was the dividend paid per share in 2008?\nAnswer: 1.93\nQuestion: what was it in 2007?\nAnswer: 1.91\nQuestion: what is the sum?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3.84" } ]
CONVFINQA958	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin addition , the company has reclassified the following amounts from 201cdistributions from other invested assets 201d included in cash flows from investing activities to 201cdistribution of limited partnership income 201d included in cash flows from operations for interim reporting periods of 2013 : $ 33686 thousand for the three months ended march 31 , 2013 ; $ 9409 thousand and $ 43095 thousand for the three months and six months ended june 30 , 2013 , respectively ; and $ 5638 thousand and $ 48733 thousand for the three months and nine months ended september 30 , 2013 , respectively . b . investments . fixed maturity and equity security investments available for sale , at market value , reflect unrealized appreciation and depreciation , as a result of temporary changes in market value during the period , in shareholders 2019 equity , net of income taxes in 201caccumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) 201d in the consolidated balance sheets . fixed maturity and equity securities carried at fair value reflect fair value re- measurements as net realized capital gains and losses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) . the company records changes in fair value for its fixed maturities available for sale , at market value through shareholders 2019 equity , net of taxes in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) since cash flows from these investments will be primarily used to settle its reserve for losses and loss adjustment expense liabilities . the company anticipates holding these investments for an extended period as the cash flow from interest and maturities will fund the projected payout of these liabilities . fixed maturities carried at fair value represent a portfolio of convertible bond securities , which have characteristics similar to equity securities and at times , designated foreign denominated fixed maturity securities , which will be used to settle loss and loss adjustment reserves in the same currency . the company carries all of its equity securities at fair value except for mutual fund investments whose underlying investments are comprised of fixed maturity securities . for equity securities , available for sale , at fair value , the company reflects changes in value as net realized capital gains and losses since these securities may be sold in the near term depending on financial market conditions . interest income on all fixed maturities and dividend income on all equity securities are included as part of net investment income in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) . unrealized losses on fixed maturities , which are deemed other-than-temporary and related to the credit quality of a security , are charged to net income ( loss ) as net realized capital losses . short-term investments are stated at cost , which approximates market value . realized gains or losses on sales of investments are determined on the basis of identified cost . for non- publicly traded securities , market prices are determined through the use of pricing models that evaluate securities relative to the u.s . treasury yield curve , taking into account the issue type , credit quality , and cash flow characteristics of each security . for publicly traded securities , market value is based on quoted market prices or valuation models that use observable market inputs . when a sector of the financial markets is inactive or illiquid , the company may use its own assumptions about future cash flows and risk-adjusted discount rates to determine fair value . retrospective adjustments are employed to recalculate the values of asset-backed securities . each acquisition lot is reviewed to recalculate the effective yield . the recalculated effective yield is used to derive a book value as if the new yield were applied at the time of acquisition . outstanding principal factors from the time of acquisition to the adjustment date are used to calculate the prepayment history for all applicable securities . conditional prepayment rates , computed with life to date factor histories and weighted average maturities , are used to effect the calculation of projected and prepayments for pass-through security types . other invested assets include limited partnerships , rabbi trusts and an affiliated entity . limited partnerships and the affiliated entity are accounted for under the equity method of accounting , which can be recorded on a monthly or quarterly lag . c . uncollectible receivable balances . the company provides reserves for uncollectible reinsurance recoverable and premium receivable balances based on management 2019s assessment of the collectability of the outstanding balances . such reserves are presented in the table below for the periods indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>reinsurance receivables and premium receivables</td><td>$ 29905</td><td>$ 32011</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of year ended december 31 2013?\nAnswer: 29905.0\nQuestion: and that of year ended december 31 2012?\nAnswer: 32011.0\nQuestion: what is the difference between the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables of year ended december 31 2013 and year ended december 31 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-2106.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4215	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) litigation settlement 2014 during may 2008 , the sec concluded its investigation that began in 2002 into our financial reporting practices , resulting in a settlement charge of $ 12.0 . investment impairments 2014 in 2007 we realized an other-than-temporary charge of $ 5.8 relating to a $ 12.5 investment in auction rate securities , representing our total investment in auction rate securities . for additional information see note 15 . note 6 : intangible assets goodwill goodwill is the excess purchase price remaining from an acquisition after an allocation of purchase price has been made to identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values . the changes in the carrying value of goodwill by segment for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>ian</td><td>cmg</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of december 31 2006</td><td>$ 2632.5</td><td>$ 435.3</td><td>$ 3067.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current year acquisitions</td><td>86.0</td><td>2014</td><td>86.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>contingent and deferred payments for prior acquisitions</td><td>4.7</td><td>3.7</td><td>8.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>amounts allocated to business dispositions</td><td>-5.7 ( 5.7 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-5.7 ( 5.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other ( primarily foreign currency translation )</td><td>72.2</td><td>2.9</td><td>75.1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance as of december 31 2007</td><td>2789.7</td><td>441.9</td><td>3231.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>current year acquisitions</td><td>99.5</td><td>1.8</td><td>101.3</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>contingent and deferred payments for prior acquisitions</td><td>28.9</td><td>1.1</td><td>30.0</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>amounts allocated to business dispositions</td><td>-0.4 ( 0.4 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-0.4 ( 0.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other ( primarily foreign currency translation )</td><td>-127.7 ( 127.7 )</td><td>-13.9 ( 13.9 )</td><td>-141.6 ( 141.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>balance as of december 31 2008</td><td>$ 2790.0</td><td>$ 430.9</td><td>$ 3220.9</td></tr></table> during the latter part of the fourth quarter of 2008 our stock price declined significantly after our annual impairment review as of october 1 , 2008 , and our market capitalization was less than our book value as of december 31 , 2008 . we considered whether there were any events or circumstances indicative of a triggering event and determined that the decline in stock price during the fourth quarter was an event that would 201cmore likely than not 201d reduce the fair value of our individual reporting units below their book value , requiring us to perform an interim impairment test for goodwill at the reporting unit level . based on the interim impairment test conducted , we concluded that there was no impairment of our goodwill as of december 31 , 2008 . we will continue to monitor our stock price as it relates to the reconciliation of our market capitalization and the fair values of our individual reporting units throughout 2009 . during our annual impairment reviews as of october 1 , 2006 our discounted future operating cash flow projections at one of our domestic advertising reporting units indicated that the implied fair value of the goodwill at this reporting unit was less than its book value , primarily due to client losses , resulting in a goodwill impairment charge of $ 27.2 in 2006 in our ian segment . other intangible assets included in other intangible assets are assets with indefinite lives not subject to amortization and assets with definite lives subject to amortization . other intangible assets include non-compete agreements , license costs , trade names and customer lists . intangible assets with definitive lives subject to amortization are amortized on a .\nQuestion: what was the value of goodwill in 2007?\nAnswer: 3231.6\nQuestion: what was the value in 2006?\nAnswer: 3067.8\nQuestion: what was the net change in value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "163.8" } ]
CONVFINQA5467	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe weighted average grant date fair value of performance-based restricted stock units granted during the years 2008 and 2007 was $ 84.33 and $ 71.72 , respectively . the total fair value of performance-based restricted stock units vested during 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 33712 , $ 49387 and $ 9181 , respectively . at september 30 , 2009 , the weighted average remaining vesting term of performance-based restricted stock units is 1.28 years . time-vested restricted stock units time-vested restricted stock units generally cliff vest three years after the date of grant , except for certain key executives of the company , including the executive officers , for which such units generally vest one year following the employee 2019s retirement . the related share-based compensation expense is recorded over the requisite service period , which is the vesting period or in the case of certain key executives is based on retirement eligibility . the fair value of all time-vested restricted stock units is based on the market value of the company 2019s stock on the date of grant . a summary of time-vested restricted stock units outstanding as of september 30 , 2009 , and changes during the year then ended is as follows : weighted average grant date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>stock units</td><td>weighted average grant date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at october 1</td><td>1570329</td><td>$ 69.35</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>618679</td><td>62.96</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>distributed</td><td>-316839 ( 316839 )</td><td>60.32</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited or canceled</td><td>-165211 ( 165211 )</td><td>62.58</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at september 30</td><td>1706958</td><td>$ 69.36</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected to vest at september 30</td><td>1536262</td><td>$ 69.36</td></tr></table> the weighted average grant date fair value of time-vested restricted stock units granted during the years 2008 and 2007 was $ 84.42 and $ 72.20 , respectively . the total fair value of time-vested restricted stock units vested during 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 29535 , $ 26674 and $ 3392 , respectively . at september 30 , 2009 , the weighted average remaining vesting term of the time-vested restricted stock units is 1.71 years . the amount of unrecognized compensation expense for all non-vested share-based awards as of september 30 , 2009 , is approximately $ 97034 , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average remaining life of approximately 2.02 years . at september 30 , 2009 , 4295402 shares were authorized for future grants under the 2004 plan . the company has a policy of satisfying share-based payments through either open market purchases or shares held in treasury . at september 30 , 2009 , the company has sufficient shares held in treasury to satisfy these payments in 2010 . other stock plans the company has a stock award plan , which allows for grants of common shares to certain key employees . distribution of 25% ( 25 % ) or more of each award is deferred until after retirement or involuntary termination , upon which the deferred portion of the award is distributable in five equal annual installments . the balance of the award is distributable over five years from the grant date , subject to certain conditions . in february 2004 , this plan was terminated with respect to future grants upon the adoption of the 2004 plan . at september 30 , 2009 and 2008 , awards for 114197 and 161145 shares , respectively , were outstanding . becton , dickinson and company notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what is the fair value of performance-based restricted stock units vested in 2009?\nAnswer: 33712.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2008?\nAnswer: 49387.0\nQuestion: what is the sum of 2008 and 2009?\nAnswer: 83099.0\nQuestion: what is the total sum including 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "92280.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2845	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 201cs&p industrials index 201d ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 201cs&p consumer durables & apparel index 201d ) , from december 31 , 2005 through december 31 , 2010 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 12.66 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2005 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . performance graph 201020092008200720062005 s&p 500 index s&p industrials index s&p consumer durables & apparel index the table below sets forth the value , as of december 31 for each of the years indicated , of a $ 100 investment made on december 31 , 2005 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p industrials index and the s&p consumer durables & apparel index and includes the reinvestment of dividends. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2007</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>masco</td><td>$ 101.79</td><td>$ 76.74</td><td>$ 42.81</td><td>$ 54.89</td><td>$ 51.51</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 115.61</td><td>$ 121.95</td><td>$ 77.38</td><td>$ 97.44</td><td>$ 111.89</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p industrials index</td><td>$ 113.16</td><td>$ 126.72</td><td>$ 76.79</td><td>$ 92.30</td><td>$ 116.64</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p consumer durables & apparel index</td><td>$ 106.16</td><td>$ 84.50</td><td>$ 56.13</td><td>$ 76.51</td><td>$ 99.87</td></tr></table> in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise . at december 31 , 2010 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 27 million shares . during 2010 , we repurchased and retired three million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 45 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2010 grant of three million shares of long-term stock awards . we did not purchase any shares during the three months ended december 31 , 2010. .\nQuestion: what was the difference between the price of masco in 2010 and the starting value as of 12/31/05?\nAnswer: -48.49\nQuestion: so what was the percentage growth during that time?\nAnswer: -0.4849\nQuestion: what was the difference between the price of the s&p 500 in 2010 and the starting value as of 12/31/05?\nAnswer: 11.89\nQuestion: and the original investment again?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "100.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5768	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npage 26 of 100 our calculation of adjusted net earnings is summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings attributable to ball corporation as reported</td><td>$ 468.0</td><td>$ 387.9</td><td>$ 319.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discontinued operations net of tax</td><td>74.9</td><td>2.2</td><td>-4.6 ( 4.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>business consolidation activities net of tax</td><td>-9.3 ( 9.3 )</td><td>13.0</td><td>27.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gains and equity earnings related to acquisitions net of tax</td><td>-105.9 ( 105.9 )</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>gain on dispositions net of tax</td><td>2212</td><td>-30.7 ( 30.7 )</td><td>-4.4 ( 4.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>debt refinancing costs net of tax</td><td>5.3</td><td>2212</td><td>2212</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>adjusted net earnings</td><td>$ 433.0</td><td>$ 372.4</td><td>$ 337.6</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>per diluted share from continuing operations as reported</td><td>$ 2.96</td><td>$ 2.05</td><td>$ 1.62</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>per diluted share as adjusted</td><td>2.36</td><td>1.96</td><td>1.74</td></tr></table> debt facilities and refinancing interest-bearing debt at december 31 , 2010 , increased $ 216.1 million to $ 2.8 billion from $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2009 . in december 2010 , ball replaced its senior credit facilities due october 2011 with new senior credit facilities due december 2015 . the senior credit facilities bear interest at variable rates and include a $ 200 million term a loan denominated in u.s . dollars , a a351 million term b loan denominated in british sterling and a 20ac100 million term c loan denominated in euros . the facilities also include ( 1 ) a multi-currency , long-term revolving credit facility that provides the company with up to approximately $ 850 million and ( 2 ) a french multi-currency revolving facility that provides the company with up to $ 150 million . the revolving credit facilities expire in december 2015 . in november 2010 , ball issued $ 500 million of new 5.75 percent senior notes due in may 2021 . the net proceeds from this offering were used to repay the borrowings under our term d loan facility and for general corporate purposes . in march 2010 , ball issued $ 500 million of new 6.75 percent senior notes due in september 2020 . on that same date , the company issued a notice of redemption to call $ 509 million in 6.875 percent senior notes due december 2012 at a redemption price of 101.146 percent of the outstanding principal amount plus accrued interest . the redemption of the bonds occurred on april 21 , 2010 , and resulted in a charge of $ 8.1 million for the call premium and the write off of unamortized financing costs and unamortized premiums . the charge is included in the 2010 statement of earnings as a component of interest expense . at december 31 , 2010 , approximately $ 976 million was available under the company 2019s committed multi-currency revolving credit facilities . the company 2019s prc operations also had approximately $ 20 million available under a committed credit facility of approximately $ 52 million . in addition to the long-term committed credit facilities , the company had $ 372 million of short-term uncommitted credit facilities available at the end of 2010 , of which $ 76.2 million was outstanding and due on demand , as well as approximately $ 175 million of available borrowings under its accounts receivable securitization program . in october 2010 , the company renewed its receivables sales agreement for a period of one year . the size of the new program will vary between a maximum of $ 125 million for settlement dates in january through april and a maximum of $ 175 million for settlement dates in the remaining months . given our free cash flow projections and unused credit facilities that are available until december 2015 , our liquidity is strong and is expected to meet our ongoing operating cash flow and debt service requirements . while the recent financial and economic conditions have raised concerns about credit risk with counterparties to derivative transactions , the company mitigates its exposure by spreading the risk among various counterparties and limiting exposure to any one party . we also monitor the credit ratings of our suppliers , customers , lenders and counterparties on a regular basis . we were in compliance with all loan agreements at december 31 , 2010 , and all prior years presented , and have met all debt payment obligations . the u.s . note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividends , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness . additional details about our debt and receivables sales agreements are available in notes 12 and 6 , respectively , accompanying the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report. .\nQuestion: what was the value per diluted share as adjusted in 2009?\nAnswer: 1.96\nQuestion: what was the value in 2008?\nAnswer: 1.74\nQuestion: what was the net change in value?\nAnswer: 0.22\nQuestion: what was the 2008 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.74" } ]
CONVFINQA9910	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nvaluation techniques 2013 cash equivalents are mostly comprised of short-term money-market instruments and are valued at cost , which approximates fair value . u.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for commingled equity funds not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor . fixed income investments categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g. , interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals and credit spreads ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . fixed income investments are categorized as level 3 when valuations using observable inputs are unavailable . the trustee typically obtains pricing based on indicative quotes or bid evaluations from vendors , brokers or the investment manager . in addition , certain other fixed income investments categorized as level 3 are valued using a discounted cash flow approach . significant inputs include projected annuity payments and the discount rate applied to those payments . certain commingled equity funds , consisting of equity mutual funds , are valued using the nav . the nav valuations are based on the underlying investments and typically redeemable within 90 days . private equity funds consist of partnership and co-investment funds . the nav is based on valuation models of the underlying securities , which includes unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 12 years . real estate funds consist of partnerships , most of which are closed-end funds , for which the nav is based on valuation models and periodic appraisals . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 10 years . hedge funds consist of direct hedge funds for which the nav is generally based on the valuation of the underlying investments . redemptions in hedge funds are based on the specific terms of each fund , and generally range from a minimum of one month to several months . contributions and expected benefit payments the funding of our qualified defined benefit pension plans is determined in accordance with erisa , as amended by the ppa , and in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . we made contributions of $ 5.0 billion to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2018 , including required and discretionary contributions . as a result of these contributions , we do not expect to make contributions to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2019 . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2018 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>2023</td><td>2024 2013 2028</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>qualified defined benefit pension plans</td><td>$ 2350</td><td>$ 2390</td><td>$ 2470</td><td>$ 2550</td><td>$ 2610</td><td>$ 13670</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retiree medical and life insurance plans</td><td>170</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>170</td><td>810</td></tr></table> defined contribution plans we maintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , we match most employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 658 million in 2018 , $ 613 million in 2017 and $ 617 million in 2016 , the majority of which were funded using our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 33.3 million and 35.5 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in 401 ( k ) contributions between the years of 2016 and 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-4.0" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.