Split (3)

train · 11.1k rows

id stringlengths 10 14	entries listlengths 2 2
CONVFINQA5191	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nlong-term liabilities . the value of the company 2019s deferred compensation obligations is based on the market value of the participants 2019 notional investment accounts . the notional investments are comprised primarily of mutual funds , which are based on observable market prices . mark-to-market derivative asset and liability 2014the company utilizes fixed-to-floating interest-rate swaps , typically designated as fair-value hedges , to achieve a targeted level of variable-rate debt as a percentage of total debt . the company also employs derivative financial instruments in the form of variable-to-fixed interest rate swaps , classified as economic hedges , in order to fix the interest cost on some of its variable-rate debt . the company uses a calculation of future cash inflows and estimated future outflows , which are discounted , to determine the current fair value . additional inputs to the present value calculation include the contract terms , counterparty credit risk , interest rates and market volatility . other investments 2014other investments primarily represent money market funds used for active employee benefits . the company includes other investments in other current assets . note 18 : leases the company has entered into operating leases involving certain facilities and equipment . rental expenses under operating leases were $ 21 for 2015 , $ 22 for 2014 and $ 23 for 2013 . the operating leases for facilities will expire over the next 25 years and the operating leases for equipment will expire over the next five years . certain operating leases have renewal options ranging from one to five years . the minimum annual future rental commitment under operating leases that have initial or remaining non- cancelable lease terms over the next five years and thereafter are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 13</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2017</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2018</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2019</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2020</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>74</td></tr></table> the company has a series of agreements with various public entities ( the 201cpartners 201d ) to establish certain joint ventures , commonly referred to as 201cpublic-private partnerships . 201d under the public-private partnerships , the company constructed utility plant , financed by the company and the partners constructed utility plant ( connected to the company 2019s property ) , financed by the partners . the company agreed to transfer and convey some of its real and personal property to the partners in exchange for an equal principal amount of industrial development bonds ( 201cidbs 201d ) , issued by the partners under a state industrial development bond and commercial development act . the company leased back the total facilities , including portions funded by both the company and the partners , under leases for a period of 40 years . the leases related to the portion of the facilities funded by the company have required payments from the company to the partners that approximate the payments required by the terms of the idbs from the partners to the company ( as the holder of the idbs ) . as the ownership of the portion of the facilities constructed by the company will revert back to the company at the end of the lease , the company has recorded these as capital leases . the lease obligation and the receivable for the principal amount of the idbs are presented by the company on a net basis . the gross cost of the facilities funded by the company recognized as a capital lease asset was $ 156 and $ 157 as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , which is presented in property , plant and equipment in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the future payments under the lease obligations are equal to and offset by the payments receivable under the idbs. .\nQuestion: from 2014 to 2015, what was the decline in the amortization expense for the operating leases for facility and equipment?\nAnswer: 1.0\nQuestion: and from 2015 to 2016, what was that decline?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "8.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7574	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , lower taxes other than income taxes , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower net revenue . 2010 compared to 2009 net income remained relatively unchanged , increasing $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 272.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>-16.9 ( 16.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gas revenue</td><td>-9.1 ( 9.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gas cost recovery asset</td><td>-3.0 ( 3.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>5.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-2.3 ( 2.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2011 net revenue</td><td>$ 247.0</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010 . the gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $ 3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset . see note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement. .\nQuestion: what is the 2010 net revenue?\nAnswer: 272.9\nQuestion: what is the 2011 net revenue?\nAnswer: 247.0\nQuestion: what is the total net revenue of the years 2010 and 2011?\nAnswer: 519.9\nQuestion: what is the sum between that total and the number 2?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "521.9" } ]
CONVFINQA10944	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan revenues , implemented with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of power blocks 3 and 4 of the union power station in march 2016 and a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the formula rate plan revenues and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge recorded in 2016 for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales and decreased usage during the unbilled sales period . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of 1237 gwh , or 4% ( 4 % ) , in industrial usage primarily due to an increase in demand from existing customers and expansion projects in the chemicals industry . 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 2408.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>62.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-6.7 ( 6.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation</td><td>-17.2 ( 17.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>-9.0 ( 9.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 2438.4</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan revenues , implemented with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of power blocks 3 and 4 of the union power station . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales , partially offset by an increase in industrial usage and an increase in volume during the unbilled period . the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to increased demand from new customers and expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .\nQuestion: what was the net change in revenues from 2015 to 2016?\nAnswer: 29.6\nQuestion: what were net revenues in 2015?\nAnswer: 2408.8\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.01229" } ]
CONVFINQA1492	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nvisa indemnification our payment services business issues and acquires credit and debit card transactions through visa u.s.a . inc . card association or its affiliates ( visa ) . in october 2007 , visa completed a restructuring and issued shares of visa inc . common stock to its financial institution members ( visa reorganization ) in contemplation of its initial public offering ( ipo ) . as part of the visa reorganization , we received our proportionate share of class b visa inc . common stock allocated to the u.s . members . prior to the ipo , the u.s . members , which included pnc , were obligated to indemnify visa for judgments and settlements related to certain specified litigation . as a result of the acquisition of national city , we became party to judgment and loss sharing agreements with visa and certain other banks . the judgment and loss sharing agreements were designed to apportion financial responsibilities arising from any potential adverse judgment or negotiated settlements related to the specified litigation . in september 2014 , visa funded $ 450 million into its litigation escrow account and reduced the conversion rate of visa b to a shares . we continue to have an obligation to indemnify visa for judgments and settlements for the remaining specified litigation . recourse and repurchase obligations as discussed in note 2 loan sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities , pnc has sold commercial mortgage , residential mortgage and home equity loans/ lines of credit directly or indirectly through securitization and loan sale transactions in which we have continuing involvement . one form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets . commercial mortgage loan recourse obligations we originate and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to fnma under fnma 2019s delegated underwriting and servicing ( dus ) program . we participated in a similar program with the fhlmc . under these programs , we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement . at december 31 , 2014 and december 31 , 2013 , the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $ 12.3 billion and $ 11.7 billion , respectively . the potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $ 3.7 billion at december 31 , 2014 and $ 3.6 billion at december 31 , 2013 . we maintain a reserve for estimated losses based upon our exposure . the reserve for losses under these programs totaled $ 35 million and $ 33 million as of december 31 , 2014 and december 31 , 2013 , respectively , and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet . if payment is required under these programs , we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred , although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses . our exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the corporate & institutional banking segment . table 150 : analysis of commercial mortgage recourse obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 33</td><td>$ 43</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>reserve adjustments net</td><td>2</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses 2013 loan repurchases and settlements</td><td>-</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 35</td><td>$ 33</td></tr></table> residential mortgage loan and home equity loan/ line of credit repurchase obligations while residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis , we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors . these loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where pnc is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements . repurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the residential mortgage banking segment . in the fourth quarter of 2013 , pnc reached agreements with both fnma and fhlmc to resolve their repurchase claims with respect to loans sold between 2000 and 2008 . pnc paid a total of $ 191 million related to these settlements . pnc 2019s repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines of credit that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by national city prior to our acquisition of national city . pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of loans sold in these transactions . repurchase activity associated with brokered home equity loans/lines of credit is reported in the non-strategic assets portfolio segment . 214 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .\nQuestion: what was, in millions the total of commercial mortgage recourse obligations in the end of 2014?\nAnswer: 35.0\nQuestion: and what was it in the beginning of that year?\nAnswer: 33.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6823	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2015 primarily related to the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we repurchased 13.6 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 285.2 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 195.5 on our common stock . net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 156.1 in 2015 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , euro and south african rand as of december 31 , 2015 compared to december 31 , 2014 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar and euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance sheet data</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 1509.7</td><td>$ 1667.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 150.1</td><td>$ 107.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>1.9</td><td>2.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>1610.3</td><td>1612.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 1762.3</td><td>$ 1722.2</td></tr></table> liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all . funding requirements our most significant funding requirements include our operations , non-cancelable operating lease obligations , capital expenditures , acquisitions , common stock dividends , taxes , debt service and contributions to pension and postretirement plans . additionally , we may be required to make payments to minority shareholders in certain subsidiaries if they exercise their options to sell us their equity interests. .\nQuestion: what was the value of dividends paid for the year?\nAnswer: 195.5\nQuestion: how many shares were repurchased?\nAnswer: 13.6\nQuestion: what is the value of dividends paid over number of shares?\nAnswer: 14.375\nQuestion: what is that value divided by 4?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3.59375" } ]
CONVFINQA4742	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) for the years 2004 and 2003. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2004</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 13.12</td><td>$ 9.89</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>16.00</td><td>11.13</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>15.85</td><td>13.10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>18.75</td><td>15.19</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2003</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 5.94</td><td>$ 3.55</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>9.90</td><td>5.41</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>11.74</td><td>8.73</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>12.00</td><td>9.59</td></tr></table> on march 18 , 2005 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 18.79 per share as reported on the as of march 18 , 2005 , we had 230604932 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 743 registered holders . in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of our class b common stock were converted into shares of our class a common stock on a one-for-one basis pursuant to the occurrence of the 201cdodge conversion event 201d as defined in our charter . our charter prohibits the future issuance of shares of class b common stock . also in february 2004 , all outstanding shares of class c common stock were converted into shares of class a common stock on a one-for-one basis . our charter permits the issuance of shares of class c common stock in the future . the information under 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 201d from the definitive proxy statement is hereby incorporated by reference into item 12 of this annual report . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 93 20448% ( 20448 % ) senior notes due 2009 , our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 , and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . our borrower subsidiaries are generally prohibited under the terms of the credit facility , subject to certain exceptions , from making to us any direct or indirect distribution , dividend or other payment on account of their limited liability company interests , partnership interests , capital stock or other equity interests , except that , if no default exists or would be created thereby under the credit facility , our borrower subsidiaries may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in accordance with the credit facility within certain specified amounts and , in addition , may pay cash dividends or make other distributions to us in respect of our outstanding indebtedness and permitted future indebtedness . the indentures governing the 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes due 2008 and the 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior subordinated notes due 2011 of american towers , inc . ( ati ) , our principal operating subsidiary , prohibit ati and certain of our other subsidiaries that have guaranteed those notes ( sister guarantors ) from paying dividends and making other payments or distributions to us unless certain .\nQuestion: what was the price of common stock at closing of march 18, 2005?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "18.79" } ]
CONVFINQA1131	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe analysis of our depreciation studies . changes in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively . under group depreciation , the historical cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized . the historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using ( i ) inflation indices published by the bureau of labor statistics and ( ii ) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies . the indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes . because of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired , we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate . in addition , we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient ( or in excess ) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies . any deficiency ( or excess ) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets . for retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business , a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions : ( i ) is unusual , ( ii ) is material in amount , and ( iii ) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies . a gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations . when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use . however , many of our assets are self-constructed . a large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties , which is typically performed by our employees , and for track line expansion and other capacity projects . costs that are directly attributable to capital projects ( including overhead costs ) are capitalized . direct costs that are capitalized as part of self- constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment . indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset . general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred . normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized . these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases . total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.3 billion for 2013 , $ 2.1 billion for 2012 , and $ 2.2 billion for 2011 . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 12 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions 2013 2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>dec . 31 2013</td><td>dec . 312012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>$ 803</td><td>$ 825</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income and other taxes payable</td><td>491</td><td>368</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accrued wages and vacation</td><td>385</td><td>376</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dividends payable</td><td>356</td><td>318</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accrued casualty costs</td><td>207</td><td>213</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>interest payable</td><td>169</td><td>172</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>equipment rents payable</td><td>96</td><td>95</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>579</td><td>556</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities</td><td>$ 3086</td><td>$ 2923</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the net change in value of total expenses for repairs and maintenance from 2012 to 2013?\nAnswer: 0.2\nQuestion: what was the value in 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2.1" } ]
CONVFINQA1549	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nconsolidated results of operations year ended december 31 , 2018 compared to year ended december 31 , 2017 net revenues increased $ 203.9 million , or 4.1% ( 4.1 % ) , to $ 5193.2 million in 2018 from $ 4989.2 million in 2017 . net revenues by product category are summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2018</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>year ended december 31 , $ change</td><td>year ended december 31 , % ( % ) change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apparel</td><td>$ 3462372</td><td>$ 3287121</td><td>$ 175251</td><td>5.3% ( 5.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>footwear</td><td>1063175</td><td>1037840</td><td>25335</td><td>2.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accessories</td><td>422496</td><td>445838</td><td>-23342 ( 23342 )</td><td>-5.2 ( 5.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total net sales</td><td>4948043</td><td>4770799</td><td>177244</td><td>3.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>license</td><td>124785</td><td>116575</td><td>8210</td><td>7.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>connected fitness</td><td>120357</td><td>101870</td><td>18487</td><td>18.1</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total net revenues</td><td>$ 5193185</td><td>$ 4989244</td><td>$ 203941</td><td>4.1% ( 4.1 % )</td></tr></table> the increase in net sales was driven primarily by : 2022 apparel unit sales growth driven by the train category ; and 2022 footwear unit sales growth , led by the run category . the increase was partially offset by unit sales decline in accessories . license revenues increased $ 8.2 million , or 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) , to $ 124.8 million in 2018 from $ 116.6 million in 2017 . connected fitness revenue increased $ 18.5 million , or 18.1% ( 18.1 % ) , to $ 120.4 million in 2018 from $ 101.9 million in 2017 primarily driven by increased subscribers on our fitness applications . gross profit increased $ 89.1 million to $ 2340.5 million in 2018 from $ 2251.4 million in 2017 . gross profit as a percentage of net revenues , or gross margin , was unchanged at 45.1% ( 45.1 % ) in 2018 compared to 2017 . gross profit percentage was favorably impacted by lower promotional activity , improvements in product cost , lower air freight , higher proportion of international and connected fitness revenue and changes in foreign currency ; these favorable impacts were offset by channel mix including higher sales to our off-price channel and restructuring related charges . with the exception of improvements in product input costs and air freight improvements , we do not expect these trends to have a material impact on the full year 2019 . selling , general and administrative expenses increased $ 82.8 million to $ 2182.3 million in 2018 from $ 2099.5 million in 2017 . as a percentage of net revenues , selling , general and administrative expenses decreased slightly to 42.0% ( 42.0 % ) in 2018 from 42.1% ( 42.1 % ) in 2017 . selling , general and administrative expense was impacted by the following : 2022 marketing costs decreased $ 21.3 million to $ 543.8 million in 2018 from $ 565.1 million in 2017 . this decrease was primarily due to restructuring efforts , resulting in lower compensation and contractual sports marketing . this decrease was partially offset by higher costs in connection with brand marketing campaigns and increased marketing investments with the growth of our international business . as a percentage of net revenues , marketing costs decreased to 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) in 2018 from 11.3% ( 11.3 % ) in 2017 . 2022 other costs increased $ 104.1 million to $ 1638.5 million in 2018 from $ 1534.4 million in 2017 . this increase was primarily due to higher incentive compensation expense and higher costs incurred for the continued expansion of our direct to consumer distribution channel and international business . as a percentage of net revenues , other costs increased to 31.6% ( 31.6 % ) in 2018 from 30.8% ( 30.8 % ) in 2017 . restructuring and impairment charges increased $ 59.1 million to $ 183.1 million from $ 124.0 million in 2017 . refer to the restructuring plans section above for a summary of charges . income ( loss ) from operations decreased $ 52.8 million , or 189.9% ( 189.9 % ) , to a loss of $ 25.0 million in 2018 from income of $ 27.8 million in 2017 . as a percentage of net revenues , income from operations decreased to a loss of 0.4% ( 0.4 % ) in 2018 from income of 0.5% ( 0.5 % ) in 2017 . income from operations for the year ended december 31 , 2018 was negatively impacted by $ 203.9 million of restructuring , impairment and related charges in connection with the 2018 restructuring plan . income from operations for the year ended december 31 , 2017 was negatively impacted by $ 129.1 million of restructuring , impairment and related charges in connection with the 2017 restructuring plan . interest expense , net decreased $ 0.9 million to $ 33.6 million in 2018 from $ 34.5 million in 2017. .\nQuestion: what was the total net revenue for 2018?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "5193185.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6187	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nduring the year ended december 31 , 2011 , we granted 354660 performance share units having a fair value based on our grant date closing stock price of $ 28.79 . these units are payable in stock and are subject to certain financial performance criteria . the fair value of these performance share unit awards is based on the grant date closing stock price of each respective award grant and will apply to the number of units ultimately awarded . the number of shares ultimately issued for each award will be based on our financial performance as compared to peer group companies over the performance period and can range from zero to 200% ( 200 % ) . as of december 31 , 2011 , estimated share payouts for outstanding non-vested performance share unit awards ranged from 150% ( 150 % ) to 195% ( 195 % ) . for the legacy frontier performance share units assumed at july 1 , 2011 , performance is based on market performance criteria , which is calculated as the total shareholder return achieved by hollyfrontier stockholders compared with the average shareholder return achieved by an equally-weighted peer group of independent refining companies over a three-year period . these share unit awards are payable in stock based on share price performance relative to the defined peer group and can range from zero to 125% ( 125 % ) of the initial target award . these performance share units were valued at july 1 , 2011 using a monte carlo valuation model , which simulates future stock price movements using key inputs including grant date and measurement date stock prices , expected stock price performance , expected rate of return and volatility of our stock price relative to the peer group over the three-year performance period . the fair value of these performance share units at july 1 , 2011 was $ 8.6 million . of this amount , $ 7.3 million relates to post-merger services and will be recognized ratably over the remaining service period through 2013 . a summary of performance share unit activity and changes during the year ended december 31 , 2011 is presented below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>performance share units</td><td>grants</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at january 1 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>556186</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted ( 1 )</td><td>354660</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vesting and transfer of ownership to recipients</td><td>-136058 ( 136058 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>774788</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes 225116 non-vested performance share grants under the legacy frontier plan that were outstanding and retained by hollyfrontier at july 1 , 2011 . for the year ended december 31 , 2011 we issued 178148 shares of our common stock having a fair value of $ 2.6 million related to vested performance share units . based on the weighted average grant date fair value of $ 20.71 there was $ 11.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance share units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years . note 7 : cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities our investment portfolio at december 31 , 2011 consisted of cash , cash equivalents and investments in debt securities primarily issued by government and municipal entities . we also hold 1000000 shares of connacher oil and gas limited common stock that was received as partial consideration upon the sale of our montana refinery in we invest in highly-rated marketable debt securities , primarily issued by government and municipal entities that have maturities at the date of purchase of greater than three months . we also invest in other marketable debt securities with the maximum maturity or put date of any individual issue generally not greater than two years from the date of purchase . all of these instruments , including investments in equity securities , are classified as available- for-sale . as a result , they are reported at fair value using quoted market prices . interest income is recorded as earned . unrealized gains and losses , net of related income taxes , are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income . upon sale , realized gains and losses on the sale of marketable securities are computed based on the specific identification of the underlying cost of the securities sold and the unrealized gains and losses previously reported in other comprehensive income are reclassified to current earnings. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in the performance shares outstanding during 2011?\nAnswer: 218602.0\nQuestion: what is the balance of the performance shares outstanding in the beginning of 2011?\nAnswer: 556186.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\nAnswer: 0.39304\nQuestion: what is the fair value of the performance share units at july 1 , 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "8.6" } ]
CONVFINQA7535	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhii expects to incur higher costs to complete ships currently under construction in avondale due to anticipated reductions in productivity . as a result , in the second quarter of 2010 , the company increased the estimates to complete lpd-23 and lpd-25 by approximately $ 210 million . the company recognized a $ 113 million pre-tax charge to operating income for these contracts in the second quarter of 2010 . hii is exploring alternative uses of the avondale facility , including alternative opportunities for the workforce . in connection with and as a result of the decision to wind down shipbuilding operations at the avondale , louisiana facility , the company began incurring and paying related employee severance and incentive compensation liabilities and expenditures , asset retirement obligation liabilities that became reasonably estimable , and amounts owed for not meeting certain requirements under its cooperative endeavor agreement with the state of louisiana . the company anticipates that it will incur substantial other restructuring and facilities shutdown related costs , including , but not limited to , severance expense , relocation expense , and asset write-downs related to the avondale facilities . these costs are expected to be allowable expenses under government accounting standards and thus should be recoverable in future years 2019 overhead costs . these future costs could approximate $ 271 million , based on management 2019s current estimate . such costs should be recoverable under existing flexibly priced contracts or future negotiated contracts in accordance with federal acquisition regulation ( 201cfar 201d ) provisions relating to the treatment of restructuring and shutdown related costs . the company is currently in discussions with the u.s . navy regarding its cost submission to support the recoverability of these costs under the far and applicable contracts , and this submission is subject to review and acceptance by the u.s . navy . the defense contract audit agency ( 201cdcaa 201d ) , a dod agency , prepared an initial audit report on the company 2019s cost proposal for restructuring and shutdown related costs of $ 310 million , which stated that the proposal was not adequately supported for the dcaa to reach a conclusion and questioned approximately $ 25 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , of the costs submitted by the company . accordingly , the dcaa did not accept the proposal as submitted . the company has submitted a revised proposal to address the concerns of the dcaa and to reflect a revised estimated total cost of $ 271 million . should the company 2019s revised proposal be challenged by the u.s . navy , the company would likely pursue prescribed dispute resolution alternatives to resolve the challenge . that process , however , would create uncertainty as to the timing and eventual allowability of the costs related to the wind down of the avondale facility . ultimately , the company anticipates these discussions with the u.s . navy will result in an agreement that is substantially in accordance with management 2019s cost recovery expectations . accordingly , hii has treated these costs as allowable costs in determining the earnings performance on its contracts in process . the actual restructuring expenses related to the wind down may be greater than the company 2019s current estimate , and any inability to recover such costs could result in a material effect on the company 2019s consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . the company also evaluated the effect that the wind down of the avondale facilities might have on the benefit plans in which hii employees participate . hii determined that the potential impact of a curtailment in these plans was not material to its consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . the table below summarizes the company 2019s liability for restructuring and shutdown related costs associated with winding down the avondale facility . as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , these costs are comprised primarily of employee severance and retention and incentive bonuses . these amounts were capitalized in inventoried costs , and will be recognized as expenses in cost of product sales beginning in 2014 . ( $ in millions ) employee compensation other accruals total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>employee compensation</td><td>other accruals</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1 2010</td><td>$ 0</td><td>$ 0</td><td>$ 0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accrual established</td><td>27</td><td>39</td><td>66</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>payments</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>adjustments</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>$ 27</td><td>$ 39</td><td>$ 66</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accrual established</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>payments</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td><td>-36 ( 36 )</td><td>-60 ( 60 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>adjustments</td><td>47</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>$ 50</td><td>$ 0</td><td>$ 50</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the absolute number of payments in employee compensation in 2011 with inverted sign?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-24.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9830	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2322 t . r o w e p r i c e g r o u p a n n u a l r e p o r t 2 0 1 1 c o n t r a c t u a l o b l i g at i o n s the following table presents a summary of our future obligations ( in a0millions ) under the terms of existing operating leases and other contractual cash purchase commitments at december 31 , 2011 . other purchase commitments include contractual amounts that will be due for the purchase of goods or services to be used in our operations and may be cancelable at earlier times than those indicated , under certain conditions that may involve termination fees . because these obligations are generally of a normal recurring nature , we expect that we will fund them from future cash flows from operations . the information presented does not include operating expenses or capital expenditures that will be committed in the normal course of operations in 2012 and future years . the information also excludes the $ 4.7 a0million of uncertain tax positions discussed in note 9 to our consolidated financial statements because it is not possible to estimate the time period in which a payment might be made to the tax authorities. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total</td><td>2012</td><td>2013-14</td><td>2015-16</td><td>later</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>noncancelable operating leases</td><td>$ 185</td><td>$ 31</td><td>$ 63</td><td>$ 57</td><td>$ 34</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other purchase commitments</td><td>160</td><td>112</td><td>38</td><td>10</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 345</td><td>$ 143</td><td>$ 101</td><td>$ 67</td><td>$ 34</td></tr></table> we also have outstanding commitments to fund additional contributions to investment partnerships in which we have an existing investment totaling $ 42.5 a0million at december 31 , 2011 . c r i t i c a l a c c o u n t i n g p o l i c i e s the preparation of financial statements often requires the selection of specific accounting methods and policies from among several acceptable alternatives . further , significant estimates and judgments may be required in selecting and applying those methods and policies in the recognition of the assets and liabilities in our balance sheet , the revenues and expenses in our statement of income , and the information that is contained in our significant accounting policies and notes to consolidated financial statements . making these estimates and judgments requires the analysis of information concerning events that may not yet be complete and of facts and circumstances that may change over time . accordingly , actual amounts or future results can differ materially from those estimates that we include currently in our consolidated financial statements , significant accounting policies , and notes . we present those significant accounting policies used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements as an integral part of those statements within this 2011 annual report . in the following discussion , we highlight and explain further certain of those policies that are most critical to the preparation and understanding of our financial statements . other than temporary impairments of available-for-sale securities . we generally classify our investment holdings in sponsored mutual funds and the debt securities held for investment by our savings bank subsidiary as available-for-sale . at the end of each quarter , we mark the carrying amount of each investment holding to fair value and recognize an unrealized gain or loss as a component of comprehensive income within the statement of stockholders 2019 equity . we next review each individual security position that has an unrealized loss or impairment to determine if that impairment is other than temporary . in determining whether a mutual fund holding is other than temporarily impaired , we consider many factors , including the duration of time it has existed , the severity of the impairment , any subsequent changes in value , and our intent and ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient for an anticipated recovery in fair value . subject to the other considerations noted above , with respect to duration of time , we believe a mutual fund holding with an unrealized loss that has persisted daily throughout the six months between quarter-ends is generally presumed to have an other than temporary impairment . we may also recognize an other than temporary loss of less than six months in our statement of income if the particular circumstances of the underlying investment do not warrant our belief that a near-term recovery is possible . an impaired debt security held by our savings bank subsidiary is considered to have an other than temporary loss that we will recognize in our statement of income if the impairment is caused by a change in credit quality that affects our ability to recover our amortized cost or if we intend to sell the security or believe that it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovering cost . minor impairments of 5% ( 5 % ) or less are generally considered temporary . other than temporary impairments of equity method investments . we evaluate our equity method investments , including our investment in uti , for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the investment exceeds its fair value , and the decline in fair value is other than temporary . goodwill . we internally conduct , manage and report our operations as one investment advisory business . we do not have distinct operating segments or components that separately constitute a business . accordingly , we attribute goodwill to a single reportable business segment and reporting unit 2014our investment advisory business . we evaluate the carrying amount of goodwill in our balance sheet for possible impairment on an annual basis in the third quarter of each year using a fair value approach . goodwill would be considered impaired whenever our historical carrying amount exceeds the fair value of our investment advisory business . our annual testing has demonstrated that the fair value of our investment advisory business ( our market capitalization ) exceeds our carrying amount ( our stockholders 2019 equity ) and , therefore , no impairment exists . should we reach a different conclusion in the future , additional work would be performed to ascertain the amount of the non-cash impairment charge to be recognized . we must also perform impairment testing at other times if an event or circumstance occurs indicating that it is more likely than not that an impairment has been incurred . the maximum future impairment of goodwill that we could incur is the amount recognized in our balance sheet , $ 665.7 a0million . stock options . we recognize stock option-based compensation expense in our consolidated statement of income using a fair value based method . fair value methods use a valuation model for shorter-term , market-traded financial instruments to theoretically value stock option grants even though they are not available for trading and are of longer duration . the black- scholes option-pricing model that we use includes the input of certain variables that are dependent on future expectations , including the expected lives of our options from grant date to exercise date , the volatility of our underlying common shares in the market over that time period , and the rate of dividends that we will pay during that time . our estimates of these variables are made for the purpose of using the valuation model to determine an expense for each reporting period and are not subsequently adjusted . unlike most of our expenses , the resulting charge to earnings using a fair value based method is a non-cash charge that is never measured by , or adjusted based on , a cash outflow . provision for income taxes . after compensation and related costs , our provision for income taxes on our earnings is our largest annual expense . we operate in numerous states and countries through our various subsidiaries , and must allocate our income , expenses , and earnings under the various laws and regulations of each of these taxing jurisdictions . accordingly , our provision for income taxes represents our total estimate of the liability that we have incurred in doing business each year in all of our locations . annually , we file tax returns that represent our filing positions with each jurisdiction and settle our return liabilities . each jurisdiction has the right to audit those returns and may take different positions with respect to income and expense allocations and taxable earnings determinations . from time to time , we may also provide for estimated liabilities associated with uncertain tax return filing positions that are subject to , or in the process of , being audited by various tax authorities . because the determination of our annual provision is subject to judgments and estimates , it is likely that actual results will vary from those recognized in our financial statements . as a result , we recognize additions to , or reductions of , income tax expense during a reporting period that pertain to prior period provisions as our estimated liabilities are revised and actual tax returns and tax audits are settled . we recognize any such prior period adjustment in the discrete quarterly period in which it is determined . n e w ly i s s u e d b u t n o t y e t a d o p t e d a c c o u n t i n g g u i d a n c e in may 2011 , the fasb issued amended guidance clarifying how to measure and disclose fair value . we do not believe the adoption of such amended guidance on january 1 , 2012 , will have a significant effect on our consolidated financial statements . we have also considered all other newly issued accounting guidance that is applicable to our operations and the preparation of our consolidated statements , including that which we have not yet adopted . we do not believe that any such guidance will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operation. .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2011, what was the amount of noncancelable operating leases?\nAnswer: 185.0\nQuestion: and what was the total of future obligations?\nAnswer: 345.0\nQuestion: what percentage, then, does that amount represent in relation to this total?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.53623" } ]
CONVFINQA9163	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2016 compared with 2015 net gains on investments of $ 57 million in 2016 decreased $ 52 million from 2015 due to lower net gains in 2016 . net gains on investments in 2015 included a $ 40 million gain related to the bkca acquisition and a $ 35 million unrealized gain on a private equity investment . interest and dividend income increased $ 14 million from 2015 primarily due to higher dividend income in 2016 . 2015 compared with 2014 net gains on investments of $ 109 million in 2015 decreased $ 45 million from 2014 due to lower net gains in 2015 . net gains on investments in 2015 included a $ 40 million gain related to the bkca acquisition and a $ 35 million unrealized gain on a private equity investment . net gains on investments in 2014 included the positive impact of the monetization of a nonstrategic , opportunistic private equity investment . interest expense decreased $ 28 million from 2014 primarily due to repayments of long-term borrowings in the fourth quarter of 2014 . income tax expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>gaap 2016</td><td>gaap 2015</td><td>gaap 2014</td><td>gaap 2016</td><td>gaap 2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating income ( 1 )</td><td>$ 4570</td><td>$ 4664</td><td>$ 4474</td><td>$ 4674</td><td>$ 4695</td><td>$ 4563</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 1 ) ( 2 )</td><td>-108 ( 108 )</td><td>-69 ( 69 )</td><td>-49 ( 49 )</td><td>-108 ( 108 )</td><td>-70 ( 70 )</td><td>-56 ( 56 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income before income taxes ( 2 )</td><td>$ 4462</td><td>$ 4595</td><td>$ 4425</td><td>$ 4566</td><td>$ 4625</td><td>$ 4507</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>$ 1290</td><td>$ 1250</td><td>$ 1131</td><td>$ 1352</td><td>$ 1312</td><td>$ 1197</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effective tax rate</td><td>28.9% ( 28.9 % )</td><td>27.2% ( 27.2 % )</td><td>25.6% ( 25.6 % )</td><td>29.6% ( 29.6 % )</td><td>28.4% ( 28.4 % )</td><td>26.6% ( 26.6 % )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) see non-gaap financial measures for further information on and reconciliation of as adjusted items . ( 2 ) net of net income ( loss ) attributable to nci . the company 2019s tax rate is affected by tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the relative amount of income earned in those jurisdictions , which the company expects to be fairly consistent in the near term . the significant foreign jurisdictions that have lower statutory tax rates than the u.s . federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) include the united kingdom , channel islands , ireland and canada . u.s . income taxes were not provided for certain undistributed foreign earnings intended to be indefinitely reinvested outside the united states . 2016 . income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 a net noncash benefit of $ 30 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; and 2022 a benefit from $ 65 million of nonrecurring items , including the resolution of certain outstanding tax matters . the as adjusted effective tax rate of 29.6% ( 29.6 % ) for 2016 excluded the net noncash benefit of $ 30 million mentioned above , as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented . 2015 . income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 a net noncash benefit of $ 54 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; and 2022 a benefit from $ 75 million of nonrecurring items , primarily due to the realization of losses from changes in the company 2019s organizational tax structure and the resolution of certain outstanding tax matters . the as adjusted effective tax rate of 28.4% ( 28.4 % ) for 2015 excluded the net noncash benefit of $ 54 million mentioned above , as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented . 2014 . income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 a $ 94 million tax benefit , primarily due to the resolution of certain outstanding tax matters related to the acquisition of bgi , including the previously mentioned $ 50 million tax benefit ( see executive summary for more information ) ; 2022 a $ 73 million net tax benefit related to several favorable nonrecurring items ; and 2022 a net noncash benefit of $ 9 million associated with the revaluation of deferred income tax liabilities . the as adjusted effective tax rate of 26.6% ( 26.6 % ) for 2014 excluded the $ 9 million net noncash benefit as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented and the $ 50 million tax benefit mentioned above . the $ 50 million general and administrative expense and $ 50 million tax benefit have been excluded from as adjusted results as there is no impact on blackrock 2019s book value . balance sheet overview as adjusted balance sheet the following table presents a reconciliation of the consolidated statement of financial condition presented on a gaap basis to the consolidated statement of financial condition , excluding the impact of separate account assets and separate account collateral held under securities lending agreements ( directly related to lending separate account securities ) and separate account liabilities and separate account collateral liabilities under securities lending agreements and consolidated sponsored investment funds , including consolidated vies . the company presents the as adjusted balance sheet as additional information to enable investors to exclude certain .\nQuestion: what was the effective tax rate in 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.289" } ]
CONVFINQA7229	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nair mobility sales declined by $ 535 million primarily due to c-130j deliveries ( 12 in 2006 compared to 15 in 2005 ) and lower volume on the c-5 program . combat aircraft sales increased by $ 292 million mainly due to higher f-35 and f-22 volume , partially offset by reduced volume on f-16 programs . other aeronautics programs sales increased by $ 83 million primarily due to higher volume in sustainment services activities . operating profit for the segment increased 21% ( 21 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . operating profit increases in combat aircraft more than offset decreases in other aeronautics programs and air mobility . combat aircraft operating profit increased $ 326 million mainly due to improved performance on f-22 and f-16 programs . air mobility and other aeronautics programs declined $ 77 million due to lower operating profit in support and sustainment activities . operating profit for the segment increased 20% ( 20 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased in both combat aircraft and air mobility . combat aircraft increased $ 114 million , mainly due to higher volume on the f-35 and f-22 programs , and improved performance on f-16 programs . the improvement for the year was also attributable in part to the fact that in 2005 , operating profit included a reduction in earnings on the f-35 program . air mobility operating profit increased $ 84 million , mainly due to improved performance on c-130j sustainment activities in 2006 . backlog decreased in 2007 as compared to 2006 primarily as a result of sales volume on the f-35 program . this decrease was offset partially by increased orders on the f-22 and c-130j programs . electronic systems electronic systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 11143</td><td>$ 10519</td><td>$ 9811</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1410</td><td>1264</td><td>1078</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>21200</td><td>19700</td><td>18600</td></tr></table> net sales for electronic systems increased by 6% ( 6 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . sales increased in missiles & fire control ( m&fc ) , maritime systems & sensors ( ms2 ) , and platform , training & energy ( pt&e ) . m&fc sales increased $ 258 million mainly due to higher volume in fire control systems and air defense programs , which more than offset declines in tactical missile programs . ms2 sales grew $ 254 million due to volume increases in undersea and radar systems activities that were offset partially by decreases in surface systems activities . pt&e sales increased $ 113 million , primarily due to higher volume in platform integration activities , which more than offset declines in distribution technology activities . net sales for electronic systems increased by 7% ( 7 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . higher volume in platform integration activities led to increased sales of $ 329 million at pt&e . ms2 sales increased $ 267 million primarily due to surface systems activities . air defense programs contributed to increased sales of $ 118 million at m&fc . operating profit for the segment increased by 12% ( 12 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 , representing an increase in all three lines of business during the year . operating profit increased $ 70 million at pt&e primarily due to higher volume and improved performance on platform integration activities . ms2 operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume on undersea and tactical systems activities that more than offset lower volume on surface systems activities . at m&fc , operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume in fire control systems and improved performance in tactical missile programs , which partially were offset by performance on certain international air defense programs in 2006 . operating profit for the segment increased by 17% ( 17 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased by $ 74 million at ms2 mainly due to higher volume on surface systems and undersea programs . pt&e operating profit increased $ 61 million mainly due to improved performance on distribution technology activities . higher volume on air defense programs contributed to a $ 52 million increase in operating profit at m&fc . the increase in backlog during 2007 over 2006 resulted primarily from increased orders for certain tactical missile programs and fire control systems at m&fc and platform integration programs at pt&e. .\nQuestion: what is the operating profit of 2007?\nAnswer: 1410.0\nQuestion: and that of 2006?\nAnswer: 1264.0\nQuestion: what is the total operating profit of 2007 and 2006?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2674.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2210	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe redemptions resulted in an early extinguishment charge of $ 5 million . on march 22 , 2010 , we redeemed $ 175 million of our 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) notes due april 15 , 2012 . the redemption resulted in an early extinguishment charge of $ 16 million in the first quarter of 2010 . on november 1 , 2010 , we redeemed all $ 400 million of our outstanding 6.65% ( 6.65 % ) notes due january 15 , 2011 . the redemption resulted in a $ 5 million early extinguishment charge . receivables securitization facility 2013 as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , we have recorded $ 100 million as secured debt under our receivables securitization facility . ( see further discussion of our receivables securitization facility in note 10 ) . 15 . variable interest entities we have entered into various lease transactions in which the structure of the leases contain variable interest entities ( vies ) . these vies were created solely for the purpose of doing lease transactions ( principally involving railroad equipment and facilities , including our headquarters building ) and have no other activities , assets or liabilities outside of the lease transactions . within these lease arrangements , we have the right to purchase some or all of the assets at fixed prices . depending on market conditions , fixed-price purchase options available in the leases could potentially provide benefits to us ; however , these benefits are not expected to be significant . we maintain and operate the assets based on contractual obligations within the lease arrangements , which set specific guidelines consistent within the railroad industry . as such , we have no control over activities that could materially impact the fair value of the leased assets . we do not hold the power to direct the activities of the vies and , therefore , do not control the ongoing activities that have a significant impact on the economic performance of the vies . additionally , we do not have the obligation to absorb losses of the vies or the right to receive benefits of the vies that could potentially be significant to the we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate these vies because our actions and decisions do not have the most significant effect on the vie 2019s performance and our fixed-price purchase price options are not considered to be potentially significant to the vie 2019s . the future minimum lease payments associated with the vie leases totaled $ 3.9 billion as of december 31 , 2011 . 16 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statement of financial position as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 included $ 2458 million , net of $ 915 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2520 million , net of $ 901 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2011 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 525</td><td>$ 297</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>489</td><td>269</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>415</td><td>276</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>372</td><td>276</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>347</td><td>262</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>2380</td><td>1179</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum leasepayments</td><td>$ 4528</td><td>$ 2559</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-685 ( 685 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum leasepayments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1874</td></tr></table> the majority of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 637 million in 2011 , $ 624 million in 2010 , and $ 686 million in 2009 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant. .\nQuestion: what was the principal amount of the 6.5% notes redeemed?\nAnswer: 175.0\nQuestion: what was the interest rate on these notes?\nAnswer: 0.065\nQuestion: what is the interest amount?\nAnswer: 11.375\nQuestion: what was the early extinguishment charge?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "16.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5832	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nother long term debt in december 2012 , the company entered into a $ 50.0 million recourse loan collateralized by the land , buildings and tenant improvements comprising the company 2019s corporate headquarters . the loan has a seven year term and maturity date of december 2019 . the loan bears interest at one month libor plus a margin of 1.50% ( 1.50 % ) , and allows for prepayment without penalty . the loan includes covenants and events of default substantially consistent with the company 2019s credit agreement discussed above . the loan also requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including transfers of any interest in the property . as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 40.0 million and $ 42.0 million , respectively . the weighted average interest rate on the loan was 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the following are the scheduled maturities of long term debt as of december 31 , 2017 : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>63000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>25000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>86250</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023 and thereafter</td><td>600000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total scheduled maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 801250</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>current maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr></table> interest expense , net was $ 34.5 million , $ 26.4 million , and $ 14.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.3 million , $ 1.2 million , and $ 0.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 7 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2017 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2017 as well as .\nQuestion: what was the interest expense net in 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "26.4" } ]
CONVFINQA10564	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2007 annual report 39 corporate snap-on 2019s general corporate expenses totaled $ 53.8 million in 2006 , up from $ 46.4 million in 2005 , primarily due to $ 15.2 million of increased stock-based and performance-based incentive compensation , including $ 6.3 million from the january 1 , 2006 , adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) . increased expenses in 2006 also included $ 4.2 million of higher insurance and other costs . these expense increases were partially offset by $ 9.5 million of benefits from rci initiatives . see note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the company 2019s adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) . financial condition snap-on 2019s growth has historically been funded by a combination of cash provided by operating activities and debt financing . snap-on believes that its cash from operations , coupled with its sources of borrowings , are sufficient to fund its anticipated requirements for working capital , capital expenditures , restructuring activities , acquisitions , common stock repurchases and dividend payments . due to snap-on 2019s credit rating over the years , external funds have been available at a reasonable cost . as of the close of business on february 15 , 2008 , snap-on 2019s long-term debt and commercial paper was rated a3 and p-2 by moody 2019s investors service and a- and a-2 by standard & poor 2019s . snap-on believes that the strength of its balance sheet , combined with its cash flows from operating activities , affords the company the financial flexibility to respond to both internal growth opportunities and those available through acquisitions . the following discussion focuses on information included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . snap-on has been focused on improving asset utilization by making more effective use of its investment in certain working capital items . the company assesses management 2019s operating performance and effectiveness relative to those components of working capital , particularly accounts receivable and inventories , that are more directly impacted by operational decisions . as of december 29 , 2007 , working capital ( current assets less current liabilities ) of $ 548.2 million was up $ 117.0 million from $ 431.2 million as of december 30 , 2006 . the increase in year-over-year working capital primarily reflects higher levels of 201ccash and cash equivalents 201d of $ 29.6 million , lower 201cnotes payable and current maturities of long-term debt 201d of $ 27.7 million , and $ 27.7 million of increased 201caccounts receivable 2013 net of allowances . 201d the following represents the company 2019s working capital position as of december 29 , 2007 , and december 30 , 2006 . ( amounts in millions ) 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions ) ad</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 93.0</td><td>$ 63.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable 2013 net of allowances</td><td>586.9</td><td>559.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories</td><td>322.4</td><td>323.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other current assets</td><td>185.1</td><td>167.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total current assets</td><td>1187.4</td><td>1113.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>-171.6 ( 171.6 )</td><td>-178.8 ( 178.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-15.9 ( 15.9 )</td><td>-43.6 ( 43.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-451.7 ( 451.7 )</td><td>-459.6 ( 459.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total current liabilities</td><td>-639.2 ( 639.2 )</td><td>-682.0 ( 682.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total working capital</td><td>$ 548.2</td><td>$ 431.2</td></tr></table> accounts receivable at the end of 2007 was $ 586.9 million , up $ 27.7 million from year-end 2006 levels . the year-over- year increase in accounts receivable primarily reflects the impact of higher sales in the fourth quarter of 2007 and $ 25.1 million of currency translation . this increase in accounts receivable was partially offset by lower levels of receivables as a result of an improvement in days sales outstanding from 76 days at year-end 2006 to 73 days at year-end 2007. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the total of current assets from 2006 to 2007?\nAnswer: 74.2\nQuestion: and what is this change as a percentage of that total in 2006?\nAnswer: 0.06665\nQuestion: in that same period, what was the change in the total of current liabilities?\nAnswer: -42.8\nQuestion: what was this total in 2006?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "682.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1380	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nduring fiscal 2006 , we repurchased 19 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $ 892 million , of which $ 7 million settled after the end of our fiscal year . in fiscal 2005 , we repurchased 17 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $ 771 million . a total of 146 million shares were held in treasury at may 28 , 2006 . we also used cash from operations to repay $ 189 million in outstanding debt in fiscal 2006 . in fiscal 2005 , we repaid nearly $ 2.2 billion of debt , including the purchase of $ 760 million principal amount of our 6 percent notes due in 2012 . fiscal 2005 debt repurchase costs were $ 137 million , consisting of $ 73 million of noncash interest rate swap losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehen- sive income , $ 59 million of purchase premium and $ 5 million of noncash unamortized cost of issuance expense . capital structure in millions may 28 , may 29 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>may 282006</td><td>may 292005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes payable</td><td>$ 1503</td><td>$ 299</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>2131</td><td>1638</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>2415</td><td>4255</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total debt</td><td>6049</td><td>6192</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>minority interests</td><td>1136</td><td>1133</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>stockholders 2019 equity</td><td>5772</td><td>5676</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total capital</td><td>$ 12957</td><td>$ 13001</td></tr></table> we have $ 2.1 billion of long-term debt maturing in the next 12 months and classified as current , including $ 131 million that may mature in fiscal 2007 based on the put rights of those note holders . we believe that cash flows from operations , together with available short- and long- term debt financing , will be adequate to meet our liquidity and capital needs for at least the next 12 months . on october 28 , 2005 , we repurchased a significant portion of our zero coupon convertible debentures pursuant to put rights of the holders for an aggregate purchase price of $ 1.33 billion , including $ 77 million of accreted original issue discount . these debentures had an aggregate prin- cipal amount at maturity of $ 1.86 billion . we incurred no gain or loss from this repurchase . as of may 28 , 2006 , there were $ 371 million in aggregate principal amount at matu- rity of the debentures outstanding , or $ 268 million of accreted value . we used proceeds from the issuance of commercial paper to fund the purchase price of the deben- tures . we also have reclassified the remaining zero coupon convertible debentures to long-term debt based on the october 2008 put rights of the holders . on march 23 , 2005 , we commenced a cash tender offer for our outstanding 6 percent notes due in 2012 . the tender offer resulted in the purchase of $ 500 million principal amount of the notes . subsequent to the expiration of the tender offer , we purchased an additional $ 260 million prin- cipal amount of the notes in the open market . the aggregate purchases resulted in the debt repurchase costs as discussed above . our minority interests consist of interests in certain of our subsidiaries that are held by third parties . general mills cereals , llc ( gmc ) , our subsidiary , holds the manufac- turing assets and intellectual property associated with the production and retail sale of big g ready-to-eat cereals , progresso soups and old el paso products . in may 2002 , one of our wholly owned subsidiaries sold 150000 class a preferred membership interests in gmc to an unrelated third-party investor in exchange for $ 150 million , and in october 2004 , another of our wholly owned subsidiaries sold 835000 series b-1 preferred membership interests in gmc in exchange for $ 835 million . all interests in gmc , other than the 150000 class a interests and 835000 series b-1 interests , but including all managing member inter- ests , are held by our wholly owned subsidiaries . in fiscal 2003 , general mills capital , inc . ( gm capital ) , a subsidiary formed for the purpose of purchasing and collecting our receivables , sold $ 150 million of its series a preferred stock to an unrelated third-party investor . the class a interests of gmc receive quarterly preferred distributions at a floating rate equal to ( i ) the sum of three- month libor plus 90 basis points , divided by ( ii ) 0.965 . this rate will be adjusted by agreement between the third- party investor holding the class a interests and gmc every five years , beginning in june 2007 . under certain circum- stances , gmc also may be required to be dissolved and liquidated , including , without limitation , the bankruptcy of gmc or its subsidiaries , failure to deliver the preferred distributions , failure to comply with portfolio requirements , breaches of certain covenants , lowering of our senior debt rating below either baa3 by moody 2019s or bbb by standard & poor 2019s , and a failed attempt to remarket the class a inter- ests as a result of a breach of gmc 2019s obligations to assist in such remarketing . in the event of a liquidation of gmc , each member of gmc would receive the amount of its then current capital account balance . the managing member may avoid liquidation in most circumstances by exercising an option to purchase the class a interests . the series b-1 interests of gmc are entitled to receive quarterly preferred distributions at a fixed rate of 4.5 percent per year , which is scheduled to be reset to a new fixed rate through a remarketing in october 2007 . beginning in october 2007 , the managing member of gmc may elect to repurchase the series b-1 interests for an amount equal to the holder 2019s then current capital account balance plus any applicable make-whole amount . gmc is not required to purchase the series b-1 interests nor may these investors put these interests to us . the series b-1 interests will be exchanged for shares of our perpetual preferred stock upon the occurrence of any of the following events : our senior unsecured debt rating falling below either ba3 as rated by moody 2019s or bb- as rated by standard & poor 2019s or fitch , inc. .\nQuestion: in the year of 2006, what was the amount of the current portion of long-term debt?\nAnswer: 2131.0\nQuestion: and what was the total capital structure of total debt?\nAnswer: 6049.0\nQuestion: what percentage, then, of the total structure did that amount represent?\nAnswer: 0.35229\nQuestion: and in the year before, what was the aggregate purchase price of the repurchased shares of common stock?\nAnswer: 771.0\nQuestion: what was the individual price of each of those shares?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "17.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7515	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nother expense , net : the company's other expense consists of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>foreign currency losses net</td><td>$ -1115 ( 1115 )</td><td>$ -1401 ( 1401 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other income ( expense ) net</td><td>69</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total other expense net</td><td>$ -1046 ( 1046 )</td><td>$ -1405 ( 1405 )</td></tr></table> income tax provision : the company recorded income tax expense of $ 77.2 million and had income before income taxes of $ 322.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , representing an effective tax rate of 23.9% ( 23.9 % ) . during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , the company recorded income tax expense of $ 90.1 million and had income before income taxes of $ 293.5 million , representing an effective tax rate of 30.7% ( 30.7 % ) . in december 2013 , the company received notice from the irs that the joint committee on taxation took no exception to the company's tax returns that were filed for 2009 and 2010 . an $ 11.0 million tax benefit was recognized in the company's 2013 financial results as the company had effectively settled uncertainty regarding the realization of refund claims filed in connection with the 2009 and 2010 returns . in the u.s. , which is the largest jurisdiction where the company receives such a tax credit , the availability of the research and development credit expired at the end of the 2011 tax year . in january 2013 , the u.s . congress passed legislation that reinstated the research and development credit retroactive to 2012 . the income tax provision for the year ended december 31 , 2013 includes approximately $ 2.3 million related to the reinstated research and development credit for 2012 activity . the decrease in the effective tax rate from the prior year is primarily due to the release of an uncertain tax position mentioned above , the reinstatement of the u.s . research and development credit mentioned above , and cash repatriation activities . when compared to the federal and state combined statutory rate , the effective tax rates for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 were favorably impacted by lower statutory tax rates in many of the company 2019s foreign jurisdictions , the domestic manufacturing deduction and tax benefits associated with the merger of the company 2019s japan subsidiaries in 2010 . net income : the company 2019s net income for the year ended december 31 , 2013 was $ 245.3 million as compared to net income of $ 203.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . diluted earnings per share was $ 2.58 for the year ended december 31 , 2013 and $ 2.14 for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . the weighted average shares used in computing diluted earnings per share were 95.1 million and 95.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . table of contents .\nQuestion: what was the net change in value of net income from 2012 to 2013?\nAnswer: 41.8\nQuestion: what was net income in 2012?\nAnswer: 203.5\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.20541" } ]
CONVFINQA2934	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nabiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) evidence of an arrangement exists , ( 2 ) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered , ( 3 ) the seller 2019s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable , and ( 4 ) collectibility is reasonably assured . further , sab 104 requires that both title and the risks and rewards of ownership be transferred to the buyer before revenue can be recognized . in addition to sab 104 , we follow the guidance of eitf 00-21 , revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables . we derive our revenues primarily from product sales , including maintenance service agreements . the great majority of our product revenues are derived from shipments of our ab5000 and bvs 5000 product lines to fulfill customer orders for a specified number of consoles and/or blood pumps for a specified price . we recognize revenues and record costs related to such sales upon product shipment . maintenance and service support contract revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the service contracts based upon the elapsed term of the service contract . government-sponsored research and development contracts and grants generally provide for payment on a cost-plus-fixed-fee basis . revenues from these contracts and grants are recognized as work is performed , provided the government has appropriated sufficient funds for the work . under contracts in which the company elects to spend significantly more on the development project during the term of the contract than the total contract amount , the company prospectively recognizes revenue on such contracts ratably over the term of the contract as it incurs related research and development costs , provided the government has appropriated sufficient funds for the work . ( d ) translation of foreign currencies all assets and liabilities of the company 2019s non-u.s . subsidiaries are translated at year-end exchange rates , and revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates for the year in accordance with sfas no . 52 , foreign currency translation . resulting translation adjustments are reflected in the accumulated other comprehensive loss component of shareholders 2019 equity . currency transaction gains and losses are included in the accompanying statement of income and are not material for the three years presented . ( e ) warranties the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale . our products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards . warranty costs are included in cost of product revenues within the consolidated statements of operations . the following table summarizes the activities in the warranty reserve for the two fiscal years ended march 31 , 2006 ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at the beginning of the year</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 231</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accrual for warranties</td><td>198</td><td>193</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>warranty expense incurred for the year</td><td>-212 ( 212 )</td><td>-257 ( 257 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at the end of the year</td><td>$ 231</td><td>$ 167</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the balance of warranty reserves at the end of 2006?\nAnswer: 167.0\nQuestion: what was the balance end the end of 2005?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "231.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1344	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nroyal caribbean cruises ltd . 15 from two to 17 nights throughout south america , the caribbean and europe . additionally , we announced that majesty of the seas will be redeployed from royal caribbean international to pullmantur in 2016 . pullmantur serves the contemporary segment of the spanish , portuguese and latin american cruise mar- kets . pullmantur 2019s strategy is to attract cruise guests from these target markets by providing a variety of cruising options and onboard activities directed at couples and families traveling with children . over the last few years , pullmantur has systematically increased its focus on latin america and has expanded its pres- ence in that market . in order to facilitate pullmantur 2019s ability to focus on its core cruise business , on march 31 , 2014 , pullmantur sold the majority of its interest in its non-core busi- nesses . these non-core businesses included pullmantur 2019s land-based tour operations , travel agency and 49% ( 49 % ) interest in its air business . in connection with the sale agreement , we retained a 19% ( 19 % ) interest in each of the non-core businesses as well as 100% ( 100 % ) ownership of the aircraft which are being dry leased to pullmantur air . see note 1 . general and note 6 . other assets to our consolidated financial statements under item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data for further details . cdf croisi e8res de france we currently operate two ships with an aggregate capacity of approximately 2800 berths under our cdf croisi e8res de france brand . cdf croisi e8res de france offers seasonal itineraries to the mediterranean , europe and caribbean . during the winter season , zenith is deployed to the pullmantur brand for sailings in south america . cdf croisi e8res de france is designed to serve the contemporary segment of the french cruise market by providing a brand tailored for french cruise guests . tui cruises tui cruises is a joint venture owned 50% ( 50 % ) by us and 50% ( 50 % ) by tui ag , a german tourism and shipping com- pany , and is designed to serve the contemporary and premium segments of the german cruise market by offering a product tailored for german guests . all onboard activities , services , shore excursions and menu offerings are designed to suit the preferences of this target market . tui cruises operates three ships , mein schiff 1 , mein schiff 2 and mein schiff 3 , with an aggregate capacity of approximately 6300 berths . in addition , tui cruises currently has three newbuild ships on order at the finnish meyer turku yard with an aggregate capacity of approximately 7500 berths : mein schiff 4 , scheduled for delivery in the second quarter of 2015 , mein schiff 5 , scheduled for delivery in the third quarter of 2016 and mein schiff 6 , scheduled for delivery in the second quarter of 2017 . in november 2014 , we formed a strategic partnership with ctrip.com international ltd . ( 201cctrip 201d ) , a chinese travel service provider , to operate a new cruise brand known as skysea cruises . skysea cruises will offer a custom-tailored product for chinese cruise guests operating the ship purchased from celebrity cruises . the new cruise line will begin service in the second quarter of 2015 . we and ctrip each own 35% ( 35 % ) of the new company , skysea holding , with the balance being owned by skysea holding management and a private equity fund . industry cruising is considered a well-established vacation sector in the north american market , a growing sec- tor over the long term in the european market and a developing but promising sector in several other emerging markets . industry data indicates that market penetration rates are still low and that a significant portion of cruise guests carried are first-time cruisers . we believe this presents an opportunity for long-term growth and a potential for increased profitability . the following table details market penetration rates for north america and europe computed based on the number of annual cruise guests as a percentage of the total population : america ( 1 ) europe ( 2 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>north america ( 1 )</td><td>europe ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>3.1% ( 3.1 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>1.1% ( 1.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>3.3% ( 3.3 % )</td><td>1.2% ( 1.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>3.4% ( 3.4 % )</td><td>1.2% ( 1.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>1.3% ( 1.3 % )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates are based on a combination of data obtained from publicly available sources including the interna- tional monetary fund and cruise lines international association ( 201cclia 201d ) . rates are based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights . includes the united states of america and canada . ( 2 ) source : our estimates are based on a combination of data obtained from publicly available sources including the interna- tional monetary fund and clia europe , formerly european cruise council . we estimate that the global cruise fleet was served by approximately 457000 berths on approximately 283 ships at the end of 2014 . there are approximately 33 ships with an estimated 98650 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the global cruise market between 2015 and 2019 , although it is also possible that ships could be ordered or taken out of service during these periods . we estimate that the global cruise industry carried 22.0 million cruise guests in 2014 compared to 21.3 million cruise guests carried in 2013 and 20.9 million cruise guests carried in 2012 . part i .\nQuestion: what is the total global cruise guests in 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "22.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7104	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2010 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company's common stock versus the standard and poor's s&p 500 retail index ( \"s&p 500 retail index\" ) and the standard and poor's s&p 500 index ( \"s&p 500\" ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>december 31 , 2010</td><td>december 31 , 2011</td><td>december 31 , 2012</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>o'reilly automotive inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 148</td><td>$ 213</td><td>$ 319</td><td>$ 419</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 retail index</td><td>100</td><td>103</td><td>128</td><td>185</td><td>203</td><td>252</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 113</td><td>$ 147</td><td>$ 164</td><td>$ 163</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: was the five year return of the s&p 500 retail index greater than the s&p 500?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "yes" } ]
CONVFINQA6847	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe weighted average grant date fair value of performance-based restricted stock units granted during the years 2008 and 2007 was $ 84.33 and $ 71.72 , respectively . the total fair value of performance-based restricted stock units vested during 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 33712 , $ 49387 and $ 9181 , respectively . at september 30 , 2009 , the weighted average remaining vesting term of performance-based restricted stock units is 1.28 years . time-vested restricted stock units time-vested restricted stock units generally cliff vest three years after the date of grant , except for certain key executives of the company , including the executive officers , for which such units generally vest one year following the employee 2019s retirement . the related share-based compensation expense is recorded over the requisite service period , which is the vesting period or in the case of certain key executives is based on retirement eligibility . the fair value of all time-vested restricted stock units is based on the market value of the company 2019s stock on the date of grant . a summary of time-vested restricted stock units outstanding as of september 30 , 2009 , and changes during the year then ended is as follows : weighted average grant date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>stock units</td><td>weighted average grant date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at october 1</td><td>1570329</td><td>$ 69.35</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>618679</td><td>62.96</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>distributed</td><td>-316839 ( 316839 )</td><td>60.32</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited or canceled</td><td>-165211 ( 165211 )</td><td>62.58</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at september 30</td><td>1706958</td><td>$ 69.36</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected to vest at september 30</td><td>1536262</td><td>$ 69.36</td></tr></table> the weighted average grant date fair value of time-vested restricted stock units granted during the years 2008 and 2007 was $ 84.42 and $ 72.20 , respectively . the total fair value of time-vested restricted stock units vested during 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 29535 , $ 26674 and $ 3392 , respectively . at september 30 , 2009 , the weighted average remaining vesting term of the time-vested restricted stock units is 1.71 years . the amount of unrecognized compensation expense for all non-vested share-based awards as of september 30 , 2009 , is approximately $ 97034 , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average remaining life of approximately 2.02 years . at september 30 , 2009 , 4295402 shares were authorized for future grants under the 2004 plan . the company has a policy of satisfying share-based payments through either open market purchases or shares held in treasury . at september 30 , 2009 , the company has sufficient shares held in treasury to satisfy these payments in 2010 . other stock plans the company has a stock award plan , which allows for grants of common shares to certain key employees . distribution of 25% ( 25 % ) or more of each award is deferred until after retirement or involuntary termination , upon which the deferred portion of the award is distributable in five equal annual installments . the balance of the award is distributable over five years from the grant date , subject to certain conditions . in february 2004 , this plan was terminated with respect to future grants upon the adoption of the 2004 plan . at september 30 , 2009 and 2008 , awards for 114197 and 161145 shares , respectively , were outstanding . becton , dickinson and company notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what is the total fair value of performance-based restricted stock units vested during 2009 and 2008?\nAnswer: 83099.0\nQuestion: what about during 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "9181.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8226	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements assessments in each of the tax jurisdictions resulting from these examinations . the company believes that adequate provisions have been made for income taxes for all periods through december 31 , 2010 . 12 . stock-based compensation the company recognized stock-based compensation of $ 52.6 million , $ 60.7 million and $ 54.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2009 included $ 6.9 million related to the modification of the vesting and exercise terms for certain employee 2019s equity awards . the company did not capitalize any stock-based compensation during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 . summary of stock-based compensation plans 2014the company maintains equity incentive plans that provide for the grant of stock-based awards to its directors , officers and employees . under the 2007 equity incentive plan ( 201c2007 plan 201d ) , which provides for the grant of non-qualified and incentive stock options , as well as restricted stock units , restricted stock and other stock-based awards , exercise prices in the case of non-qualified and incentive stock options are not less than the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant . equity awards typically vest ratably over various periods , generally four years , and generally expire ten years from the date of grant . stock options 2014as of december 31 , 2010 , the company had the ability to grant stock-based awards with respect to an aggregate of 22.0 million shares of common stock under the 2007 plan . the fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model based on the assumptions noted in the table below . the risk-free treasury rate is based on the u.s . treasury yield in effect at the accounting measurement date . the expected life ( estimated period of time outstanding ) was estimated using the vesting term and historical exercise behavior of company employees . the expected volatility was based on historical volatility for a period equal to the expected life of the stock options . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>range of risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.41% ( 1.41 % ) 2013 2.39% ( 2.39 % )</td><td>1.41% ( 1.41 % ) 2013 2.04% ( 2.04 % )</td><td>1.44% ( 1.44 % ) 2013 3.05% ( 3.05 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.35% ( 2.35 % )</td><td>1.71% ( 1.71 % )</td><td>1.89% ( 1.89 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life of option grants</td><td>4.60 years</td><td>4.00 years</td><td>4.00 years</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>range of expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>37.11% ( 37.11 % ) 2013 37.48% ( 37.48 % )</td><td>36.00% ( 36.00 % ) 2013 36.63% ( 36.63 % )</td><td>28.51% ( 28.51 % ) 2013 35.30% ( 35.30 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price</td><td>37.14% ( 37.14 % )</td><td>36.23% ( 36.23 % )</td><td>29.10% ( 29.10 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expected annual dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> the weighted average grant date fair value per share during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 15.03 , $ 8.90 and $ 9.55 , respectively . the intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 62.7 million , $ 40.1 million and $ 99.1 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2010 , total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock options was approximately $ 27.7 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately two years . the amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options was approximately $ 129.1 million during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , the company realized approximately $ 0.3 million of state tax benefits from the exercise of stock options. .\nQuestion: what was the net change of the intrinsic value of stock options from 2009 to 2010?\nAnswer: 22.6\nQuestion: what was this value in 2009?\nAnswer: 40.1\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.56359" } ]
CONVFINQA1378	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nduring fiscal 2006 , we repurchased 19 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $ 892 million , of which $ 7 million settled after the end of our fiscal year . in fiscal 2005 , we repurchased 17 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $ 771 million . a total of 146 million shares were held in treasury at may 28 , 2006 . we also used cash from operations to repay $ 189 million in outstanding debt in fiscal 2006 . in fiscal 2005 , we repaid nearly $ 2.2 billion of debt , including the purchase of $ 760 million principal amount of our 6 percent notes due in 2012 . fiscal 2005 debt repurchase costs were $ 137 million , consisting of $ 73 million of noncash interest rate swap losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehen- sive income , $ 59 million of purchase premium and $ 5 million of noncash unamortized cost of issuance expense . capital structure in millions may 28 , may 29 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>may 282006</td><td>may 292005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes payable</td><td>$ 1503</td><td>$ 299</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>2131</td><td>1638</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>2415</td><td>4255</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total debt</td><td>6049</td><td>6192</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>minority interests</td><td>1136</td><td>1133</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>stockholders 2019 equity</td><td>5772</td><td>5676</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total capital</td><td>$ 12957</td><td>$ 13001</td></tr></table> we have $ 2.1 billion of long-term debt maturing in the next 12 months and classified as current , including $ 131 million that may mature in fiscal 2007 based on the put rights of those note holders . we believe that cash flows from operations , together with available short- and long- term debt financing , will be adequate to meet our liquidity and capital needs for at least the next 12 months . on october 28 , 2005 , we repurchased a significant portion of our zero coupon convertible debentures pursuant to put rights of the holders for an aggregate purchase price of $ 1.33 billion , including $ 77 million of accreted original issue discount . these debentures had an aggregate prin- cipal amount at maturity of $ 1.86 billion . we incurred no gain or loss from this repurchase . as of may 28 , 2006 , there were $ 371 million in aggregate principal amount at matu- rity of the debentures outstanding , or $ 268 million of accreted value . we used proceeds from the issuance of commercial paper to fund the purchase price of the deben- tures . we also have reclassified the remaining zero coupon convertible debentures to long-term debt based on the october 2008 put rights of the holders . on march 23 , 2005 , we commenced a cash tender offer for our outstanding 6 percent notes due in 2012 . the tender offer resulted in the purchase of $ 500 million principal amount of the notes . subsequent to the expiration of the tender offer , we purchased an additional $ 260 million prin- cipal amount of the notes in the open market . the aggregate purchases resulted in the debt repurchase costs as discussed above . our minority interests consist of interests in certain of our subsidiaries that are held by third parties . general mills cereals , llc ( gmc ) , our subsidiary , holds the manufac- turing assets and intellectual property associated with the production and retail sale of big g ready-to-eat cereals , progresso soups and old el paso products . in may 2002 , one of our wholly owned subsidiaries sold 150000 class a preferred membership interests in gmc to an unrelated third-party investor in exchange for $ 150 million , and in october 2004 , another of our wholly owned subsidiaries sold 835000 series b-1 preferred membership interests in gmc in exchange for $ 835 million . all interests in gmc , other than the 150000 class a interests and 835000 series b-1 interests , but including all managing member inter- ests , are held by our wholly owned subsidiaries . in fiscal 2003 , general mills capital , inc . ( gm capital ) , a subsidiary formed for the purpose of purchasing and collecting our receivables , sold $ 150 million of its series a preferred stock to an unrelated third-party investor . the class a interests of gmc receive quarterly preferred distributions at a floating rate equal to ( i ) the sum of three- month libor plus 90 basis points , divided by ( ii ) 0.965 . this rate will be adjusted by agreement between the third- party investor holding the class a interests and gmc every five years , beginning in june 2007 . under certain circum- stances , gmc also may be required to be dissolved and liquidated , including , without limitation , the bankruptcy of gmc or its subsidiaries , failure to deliver the preferred distributions , failure to comply with portfolio requirements , breaches of certain covenants , lowering of our senior debt rating below either baa3 by moody 2019s or bbb by standard & poor 2019s , and a failed attempt to remarket the class a inter- ests as a result of a breach of gmc 2019s obligations to assist in such remarketing . in the event of a liquidation of gmc , each member of gmc would receive the amount of its then current capital account balance . the managing member may avoid liquidation in most circumstances by exercising an option to purchase the class a interests . the series b-1 interests of gmc are entitled to receive quarterly preferred distributions at a fixed rate of 4.5 percent per year , which is scheduled to be reset to a new fixed rate through a remarketing in october 2007 . beginning in october 2007 , the managing member of gmc may elect to repurchase the series b-1 interests for an amount equal to the holder 2019s then current capital account balance plus any applicable make-whole amount . gmc is not required to purchase the series b-1 interests nor may these investors put these interests to us . the series b-1 interests will be exchanged for shares of our perpetual preferred stock upon the occurrence of any of the following events : our senior unsecured debt rating falling below either ba3 as rated by moody 2019s or bb- as rated by standard & poor 2019s or fitch , inc. .\nQuestion: in the year of 2006, what was the amount of the current portion of long-term debt?\nAnswer: 2131.0\nQuestion: and what was the total capital structure of total debt?\nAnswer: 6049.0\nQuestion: what percentage, then, of the total structure did that amount represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.35229" } ]
CONVFINQA10815	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the revolving credit and long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . in july 2011 , in connection with the company 2019s acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company assumed a $ 38.6 million nonrecourse loan secured by a mortgage on the acquired property . the acquisition of the company 2019s corporate headquarters was accounted for as a business combination , and the carrying value of the loan secured by the acquired property approximates fair value . the assumed loan had an original term of approximately ten years with a scheduled maturity date of march 1 , 2013 . the loan includes a balloon payment of $ 37.3 million due at maturity , and may not be prepaid . the assumed loan is nonrecourse with the lender 2019s remedies for non-performance limited to action against the acquired property and certain required reserves and a cash collateral account , except for nonrecourse carve outs related to fraud , breaches of certain representations , warranties or covenants , including those related to environmental matters , and other standard carve outs for a loan of this type . the loan requires certain minimum cash flows and financial results from the property , and if those requirements are not met , additional reserves may be required . the assumed loan requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including material leases , changes to property management , transfers of any part of the property and material alterations to the property . the loan has an interest rate of 6.73% ( 6.73 % ) . in connection with the assumed loan , the company incurred and capitalized $ 0.8 million in deferred financing costs . as of december 31 , 2011 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 38.2 million . in addition , in connection with the assumed loan for the acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company was required to set aside amounts in reserve and cash collateral accounts . as of december 31 , 2011 , $ 2.0 million of restricted cash was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets , and the remaining $ 3.0 million of restricted cash was included in other long term assets . interest expense was $ 3.9 million , $ 2.3 million and $ 2.4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs and interest expense under the credit and long term debt facilities , as well as the assumed loan discussed above . 8 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its retail stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2023 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2011 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its retail stores based on future sales above a specified limit . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2011 : ( in thousands ) operating . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>operating</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 22926</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>23470</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>26041</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>24963</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>18734</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2017 and thereafter</td><td>69044</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 185178</td></tr></table> included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 26.7 million , $ 21.3 million and $ 14.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , under non-cancelable .\nQuestion: what was the rent expense for the year ended 12/31/11?\nAnswer: 26.7\nQuestion: and for the year ended 12/31/10?\nAnswer: 21.3\nQuestion: what was the difference between these two years?\nAnswer: 5.4\nQuestion: and the specific amount for the period ended 12/31/10 again?\nAnswer: 21.3\nQuestion: so what was the percentage change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.25352" } ]
CONVFINQA2932	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncelanese purchases of its equity securities information regarding repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2014 is as follows : period number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program ( 2 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>totalnumberof sharespurchased ( 1 )</td><td>averageprice paidper share</td><td>total numberof sharespurchased aspart of publiclyannounced program</td><td>approximatedollarvalue of sharesremaining thatmay bepurchased underthe program ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31 2014</td><td>192580</td><td>$ 58.02</td><td>164800</td><td>$ 490000000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30 2014</td><td>468128</td><td>$ 59.25</td><td>468128</td><td>$ 463000000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31 2014</td><td>199796</td><td>$ 60.78</td><td>190259</td><td>$ 451000000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>860504</td><td>-</td><td>823187</td><td>-</td></tr></table> ___________________________ ( 1 ) includes 27780 and 9537 for october and december 2014 , respectively , related to shares withheld from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes related to the vesting of restricted stock units . ( 2 ) our board of directors has authorized the aggregate repurchase of $ 1.4 billion of our common stock since february 2008 . see note 17 - stockholders' equity in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information . performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed \"soliciting material\" or to be \"filed\" with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . comparison of cumulative total return .\nQuestion: what was the total number of shares withheld from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes in october?\nAnswer: 27780.0\nQuestion: and what was it in december?\nAnswer: 9537.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the combined total for the two months?\nAnswer: 37317.0\nQuestion: and how much does this combined total represent in relation to the total number of shares purchased in the last quarter of 2014, in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.04337" } ]
CONVFINQA6335	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nincreased over 4% ( 4 % ) in 2005 , costs for trucking services provided by intermodal carriers remained flat as we substantially reduced expenses associated with network inefficiencies . higher diesel fuel prices increased sales and use taxes in 2005 , which resulted in higher state and local taxes . other contract expenses for equipment maintenance and other services increased in 2005 . the 2005 january west coast storm and hurricanes katrina and rita also contributed to higher expenses in 2005 ( net of insurance settlements received ) . partially offsetting these increases was a reduction in relocation expenses as we incurred higher relocation costs associated with moving support personnel to omaha , nebraska during 2004 . non-operating items millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 % ( % ) change 2006 v 2005 % ( % ) change 2005 v 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>% ( % ) change 2006 v 2005</td><td>% ( % ) change 2005 v 2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other income</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 88</td><td>( 19 ) % ( % )</td><td>65% ( 65 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense</td><td>-477 ( 477 )</td><td>-504 ( 504 )</td><td>-527 ( 527 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income taxes</td><td>-919 ( 919 )</td><td>-410 ( 410 )</td><td>-252 ( 252 )</td><td>124</td><td>63</td></tr></table> other income 2013 lower net gains from non-operating asset sales and higher expenses due to rising interest rates associated with our sale of receivables program resulted in a reduction in other income in 2006 , which was partially offset by higher rental income for the use of our right-of-way ( including 2006 settlements of rate disputes from prior years ) and cash investment returns due to higher interest rates . in 2005 , other income increased largely as a result of higher gains from real estate sales partially offset by higher expenses due to rising interest rates associated with our sale of receivables program . interest expense 2013 lower interest expense in 2006 and 2005 was primarily due to declining weighted-average debt levels of $ 7.1 billion , $ 7.8 billion , and $ 8.1 billion in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , respectively . a higher effective interest rate of 6.7% ( 6.7 % ) in 2006 , compared to 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) in both 2005 and 2004 , partially offset the effects of the declining debt level . income taxes 2013 income tax expense was $ 509 million higher in 2006 than 2005 . higher pre-tax income resulted in additional taxes of $ 414 million and $ 118 million of the increase resulted from the one-time reduction in 2005 described below . our effective tax rate was 36.4% ( 36.4 % ) and 28.6% ( 28.6 % ) in 2006 and 2005 , respectively . income taxes were greater in 2005 than 2004 due to higher pre-tax income partially offset by a previously reported reduction in income tax expense . in our quarterly report on form 10-q for the quarter ended june 30 , 2005 , we reported that the corporation analyzed the impact that final settlements of pre-1995 tax years had on previously recorded estimates of deferred tax assets and liabilities . the completed analysis of the final settlements for pre-1995 tax years , along with internal revenue service examination reports for tax years 1995 through 2002 were considered , among other things , in a review and re-evaluation of the corporation 2019s estimated deferred tax assets and liabilities as of september 30 , 2005 , resulting in an income tax expense reduction of $ 118 million in .\nQuestion: what is the other income in 2006?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "118.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9980	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the company does not make any contributions to its postretirement plan other than funding benefits payments . the following table summarizes expected net benefit payments from the company 2019s general assets through 2019 : benefit payments expected subsidy receipts benefit payments . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>benefit payments</td><td>expected subsidy receipts</td><td>net benefit payments</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 2714</td><td>$ 71</td><td>$ 2643</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>3028</td><td>91</td><td>2937</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>3369</td><td>111</td><td>3258</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>3660</td><td>134</td><td>3526</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>4019</td><td>151</td><td>3868</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015 2013 2019</td><td>22686</td><td>1071</td><td>21615</td></tr></table> the company provides limited postemployment benefits to eligible former u.s . employees , primarily severance under a formal severance plan ( the 201cseverance plan 201d ) . the company accounts for severance expense by accruing the expected cost of the severance benefits expected to be provided to former employees after employment over their relevant service periods . the company updates the assumptions in determining the severance accrual by evaluating the actual severance activity and long-term trends underlying the assumptions . as a result of updating the assumptions , the company recorded incremental severance expense ( benefit ) related to the severance plan of $ 3471 , $ 2643 and $ ( 3418 ) , respectively , during the years 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . these amounts were part of total severance expenses of $ 135113 , $ 32997 and $ 21284 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . note 14 . debt on april 28 , 2008 , the company extended its committed unsecured revolving credit facility , dated as of april 28 , 2006 ( the 201ccredit facility 201d ) , for an additional year . the new expiration date of the credit facility is april 26 , 2011 . the available funding under the credit facility will remain at $ 2500000 through april 27 , 2010 and then decrease to $ 2000000 during the final year of the credit facility agreement . other terms and conditions in the credit facility remain unchanged . the company 2019s option to request that each lender under the credit facility extend its commitment was provided pursuant to the original terms of the credit facility agreement . borrowings under the facility are available to provide liquidity in the event of one or more settlement failures by mastercard international customers and , subject to a limit of $ 500000 , for general corporate purposes . the facility fee and borrowing cost are contingent upon the company 2019s credit rating . at december 31 , 2009 , the facility fee was 7 basis points on the total commitment , or approximately $ 1774 annually . interest on borrowings under the credit facility would be charged at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus an applicable margin of 28 basis points or an alternative base rate , and a utilization fee of 10 basis points would be charged if outstanding borrowings under the facility exceed 50% ( 50 % ) of commitments . at the inception of the credit facility , the company also agreed to pay upfront fees of $ 1250 and administrative fees of $ 325 , which are being amortized over five years . facility and other fees associated with the credit facility totaled $ 2222 , $ 2353 and $ 2477 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . mastercard was in compliance with the covenants of the credit facility and had no borrowings under the credit facility at december 31 , 2009 or december 31 , 2008 . the majority of credit facility lenders are members or affiliates of members of mastercard international . in june 1998 , mastercard international issued ten-year unsecured , subordinated notes ( the 201cnotes 201d ) paying a fixed interest rate of 6.67% ( 6.67 % ) per annum . mastercard repaid the entire principal amount of $ 80000 on june 30 , 2008 pursuant to the terms of the notes . the interest expense on the notes was $ 2668 and $ 5336 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the total of benefit payments in 2012?\nAnswer: 3369.0\nQuestion: and what was that in 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3028.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3730	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmeet customer needs and put us in a position to handle demand changes . we will also continue utilizing industrial engineering techniques to improve productivity . 2022 fuel prices 2013 uncertainty about the economy makes fuel price projections difficult , and we could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s . domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical issues and events , weather conditions and other factors . to reduce the impact of fuel price on earnings , we will continue to seek recovery from our customers through our fuel surcharge programs and to expand our fuel conservation efforts . 2022 capital plan 2013 in 2010 , we plan to make total capital investments of approximately $ 2.5 billion , including expenditures for ptc , which may be revised if business conditions or new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan . 2022 positive train control ( ptc ) 2013 in response to a legislative mandate to implement ptc by the end of 2015 , we expect to spend approximately $ 200 million during 2010 on the development of ptc . we currently estimate that ptc will cost us approximately $ 1.4 billion to implement by the end of 2015 , in accordance with rules issued by the fra . this includes costs for installing the new system along our tracks , upgrading locomotives to work with the new system , and adding digital data communication equipment so all the parts of the system can communicate with each other . 2022 financial expectations 2013 we remain cautious about economic conditions but expect volume to increase from 2009 levels . in addition , we anticipate continued pricing opportunities and further productivity improvements . results of operations operating revenues millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 % ( % ) change 2008 v 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>% ( % ) change 2009 v 2008</td><td>% ( % ) change 2008 v 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>freight revenues</td><td>$ 13373</td><td>$ 17118</td><td>$ 15486</td><td>( 22 ) % ( % )</td><td>11% ( 11 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other revenues</td><td>770</td><td>852</td><td>797</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 14143</td><td>$ 17970</td><td>$ 16283</td><td>( 21 ) % ( % )</td><td>10% ( 10 % )</td></tr></table> freight revenues are revenues generated by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups . freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) . changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc . we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as a reduction to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments . we recognize freight revenues on a percentage-of-completion basis as freight moves from origin to destination . we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them . other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage . we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations . freight revenues and volume levels for all six commodity groups decreased during 2009 , reflecting continued economic weakness . we experienced the largest volume declines in automotive and industrial .\nQuestion: what is the total capital investments in 2010, in billions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2.5" } ]
CONVFINQA1730	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nour refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is the difference between the prices of refined products sold and the costs of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks refined , including the costs to transport these inputs to our refineries , the costs of purchased products and manufacturing expenses , including depreciation . the crack spread is a measure of the difference between market prices for refined products and crude oil , commonly used by the industry as an indicator of the impact of price on the refining margin . crack spreads can fluctuate significantly , particularly when prices of refined products do not move in the same relationship as the cost of crude oil . as a performance benchmark and a comparison with other industry participants , we calculate midwest ( chicago ) and u.s . gulf coast crack spreads that we feel most closely track our operations and slate of products . posted light louisiana sweet ( 201clls 201d ) prices and a 6-3-2-1 ratio of products ( 6 barrels of crude oil producing 3 barrels of gasoline , 2 barrels of distillate and 1 barrel of residual fuel ) are used for the crack spread calculation . the following table lists calculated average crack spreads by quarter for the midwest ( chicago ) and gulf coast markets in 2008 . crack spreads ( dollars per barrel ) 1st qtr 2nd qtr 3rd qtr 4th qtr 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>crack spreads ( dollars per barrel )</td><td>1st qtr</td><td>2nd qtr</td><td>3rd qtr</td><td>4th qtr</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>chicago lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 0.07</td><td>$ 2.71</td><td>$ 7.81</td><td>$ 2.31</td><td>$ 3.27</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>us gulf coast lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 1.39</td><td>$ 1.99</td><td>$ 6.32</td><td>( $ 0.01 )</td><td>$ 2.45</td></tr></table> in addition to the market changes indicated by the crack spreads , our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is impacted by factors such as the types of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks processed , the selling prices realized for refined products , the impact of commodity derivative instruments used to mitigate price risk and the cost of purchased products for resale . we process significant amounts of sour crude oil which can enhance our profitability compared to certain of our competitors , as sour crude oil typically can be purchased at a discount to sweet crude oil . finally , our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is impacted by changes in manufacturing costs , which are primarily driven by the level of maintenance activities at the refineries and the price of purchased natural gas used for plant fuel . our 2008 refining and wholesale marketing gross margin was the key driver of the 43 percent decrease in rm&t segment income when compared to 2007 . our average refining and wholesale marketing gross margin per gallon decreased 37 percent , to 11.66 cents in 2008 from 18.48 cents in 2007 , primarily due to the significant and rapid increases in crude oil prices early in 2008 and lagging wholesale price realizations . our retail marketing gross margin for gasoline and distillates , which is the difference between the ultimate price paid by consumers and the cost of refined products , including secondary transportation and consumer excise taxes , also impacts rm&t segment profitability . while on average demand has been increasing for several years , there are numerous factors including local competition , seasonal demand fluctuations , the available wholesale supply , the level of economic activity in our marketing areas and weather conditions that impact gasoline and distillate demand throughout the year . in 2008 , demand began to drop due to the combination of significant increases in retail petroleum prices and a broad slowdown in general activity . the gross margin on merchandise sold at retail outlets has historically been more constant . the profitability of our pipeline transportation operations is primarily dependent on the volumes shipped through our crude oil and refined products pipelines . the volume of crude oil that we transport is directly affected by the supply of , and refiner demand for , crude oil in the markets served directly by our crude oil pipelines . key factors in this supply and demand balance are the production levels of crude oil by producers , the availability and cost of alternative modes of transportation , and refinery and transportation system maintenance levels . the volume of refined products that we transport is directly affected by the production levels of , and user demand for , refined products in the markets served by our refined product pipelines . in most of our markets , demand for gasoline peaks during the summer and declines during the fall and winter months , whereas distillate demand is more ratable throughout the year . as with crude oil , other transportation alternatives and system maintenance levels influence refined product movements . integrated gas our integrated gas strategy is to link stranded natural gas resources with areas where a supply gap is emerging due to declining production and growing demand . our integrated gas operations include marketing and transportation of products manufactured from natural gas , such as lng and methanol , primarily in the u.s. , europe and west africa . our most significant lng investment is our 60 percent ownership in a production facility in equatorial guinea , which sells lng under a long-term contract at prices tied to henry hub natural gas prices . in 2008 , its .\nQuestion: what was the total combined crack spread for us gulf coast in the first and second quarters of 2008?\nAnswer: 3.38\nQuestion: and what was the average crack spread for us gulf coast lls 6-3-2-1 between those quarters?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.69" } ]
CONVFINQA2947	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities vornado 2019s common shares are traded on the new york stock exchange under the symbol 201cvno . 201d quarterly high and low sales prices of the common shares and dividends paid per share for the years ended december 31 , 2011 and 2010 were as follows : year ended year ended december 31 , 2011 december 31 , 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>quarter</td><td>year ended december 31 2011 high</td><td>year ended december 31 2011 low</td><td>year ended december 31 2011 dividends</td><td>year ended december 31 2011 high</td><td>year ended december 31 2011 low</td><td>dividends</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>1st</td><td>$ 93.53</td><td>$ 82.12</td><td>$ 0.69</td><td>$ 78.40</td><td>$ 61.25</td><td>$ 0.65</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2nd</td><td>98.42</td><td>86.85</td><td>0.69</td><td>86.79</td><td>70.06</td><td>0.65</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>3rd</td><td>98.77</td><td>72.85</td><td>0.69</td><td>89.06</td><td>68.59</td><td>0.65</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>4th</td><td>84.30</td><td>68.39</td><td>0.69</td><td>91.67</td><td>78.06</td><td>0.65</td></tr></table> as of february 1 , 2012 , there were 1230 holders of record of our common shares . recent sales of unregistered securities during the fourth quarter of 2011 , we issued 20891 common shares upon the redemption of class a units of the operating partnership held by persons who received units , in private placements in earlier periods , in exchange for their interests in limited partnerships that owned real estate . the common shares were issued without registration under the securities act of 1933 in reliance on section 4 ( 2 ) of that act . information relating to compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance is set forth under part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k and such information is incorporated by reference herein . recent purchases of equity securities in december 2011 , we received 410783 vornado common shares at an average price of $ 76.36 per share as payment for the exercise of certain employee options. .\nQuestion: in december of 2011, what was the full value of the vornado common shares received as payment for the exercise of certain employee options?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "31367389.88" } ]
CONVFINQA10931	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n52 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k repatriation of undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 would have resulted in a u.s . tax cost of approximately $ 250 million and $ 110 million , respectively . the company files federal , state and local income tax returns in numerous domestic and foreign jurisdictions . in most tax jurisdictions , returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities for a number of years after the returns have been filed . the company is no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities in any major tax jurisdiction for years before 2006 . additionally , the internal revenue service has completed its examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax returns filed for years through 2010 . the examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax return for 2011 is currently underway and is expected to be finalized during 2014 . a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( excluding interest and penalties ) as of december 31 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 111</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>9</td><td>2</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-19 ( 19 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits</td><td>2014</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions for expiration of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>2014</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 85</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 107</td></tr></table> the company expects that any reasonably possible change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months would not be significant . the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate was $ 81 million as of december 31 , 2013 . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had liabilities for estimated interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the company recognized $ 2 million and $ 5 million of income in 2013 and 2012 , respectively , related to the reduction of estimated interest and penalties . the company recognized no income or expense for estimated interest and penalties during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . 13 . pensions and other postretirement benefits defined benefit plans ppg has defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees worldwide . the principal defined benefit pension plans are those in the u.s. , canada , the netherlands and the u.k . which , in the aggregate represent approximately 91% ( 91 % ) of the projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2013 , of which the u.s . defined benefit pension plans represent the majority . ppg also sponsors welfare benefit plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits for certain u.s . and canadian employees and their dependents . these programs require retiree contributions based on retiree-selected coverage levels for certain retirees and their dependents and provide for sharing of future benefit cost increases between ppg and participants based on management discretion . the company has the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefit plans in the future . salaried and certain hourly employees in the u.s . hired on or after october 1 , 2004 , or rehired on or after october 1 , 2012 are not eligible for postretirement medical benefits . salaried employees in the u.s . hired , rehired or transferred to salaried status on or after january 1 , 2006 , and certain u.s . hourly employees hired in 2006 or thereafter are eligible to participate in a defined contribution retirement plan . these employees are not eligible for defined benefit pension plan benefits . plan design changes in january 2011 , the company approved an amendment to one of its u.s . defined benefit pension plans that represented about 77% ( 77 % ) of the total u.s . projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2011 . depending upon the affected employee's combined age and years of service to ppg , this change resulted in certain employees no longer accruing benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2011 , while the remaining employees will no longer accrue benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2020 . the affected employees will participate in the company 2019s defined contribution retirement plan from the date their benefit under the defined benefit plan is frozen . the company remeasured the projected benefit obligation of this amended plan , which lowered 2011 pension expense by approximately $ 12 million . the company made similar changes to certain other u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 . the company recognized a curtailment loss and special termination benefits associated with these plan amendments of $ 5 million in 2011 . the company plans to continue reviewing and potentially changing other ppg defined benefit plans in the future . separation and merger of commodity chemicals business on january 28 , 2013 , ppg completed the separation of its commodity chemicals business and the merger of the subsidiary holding the ppg commodity chemicals business with a subsidiary of georgia gulf , as discussed in note 22 , 201cseparation and merger transaction . 201d ppg transferred the defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement benefit liabilities for the affected employees in the u.s. , canada , and taiwan in the separation resulting in a net partial settlement loss of $ 33 million notes to the consolidated financial statements .\nQuestion: what was the value of unrecognized tax benefits in 2013?\nAnswer: 85.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2012?\nAnswer: 82.0\nQuestion: what is the difference?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2683	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\non may 12 , 2017 , the company 2019s stockholders approved the american water works company , inc . 2017 omnibus equity compensation plan ( the 201c2017 omnibus plan 201d ) . a total of 7.2 million shares of common stock may be issued under the 2017 omnibus plan . as of december 31 , 2017 , 7.2 million shares were available for grant under the 2017 omnibus plan . the 2017 omnibus plan provides that grants of awards may be in any of the following forms : incentive stock options , nonqualified stock options , stock appreciation rights , stock units , stock awards , other stock-based awards and dividend equivalents , which may be granted only on stock units or other stock-based awards . following the approval of the 2017 omnibus plan , no additional awards are to be granted under the 2007 plan . however , shares will still be issued under the 2007 plan pursuant to the terms of awards previously issued under that plan prior to may 12 , 2017 . the cost of services received from employees in exchange for the issuance of stock options and restricted stock awards is measured based on the grant date fair value of the awards issued . the value of stock options and rsus awards at the date of the grant is amortized through expense over the three-year service period . all awards granted in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are classified as equity . the company recognizes compensation expense for stock awards over the vesting period of the award . the company stratified its grant populations and used historic employee turnover rates to estimate employee forfeitures . the estimated rate is compared to the actual forfeitures at the end of the reporting period and adjusted as necessary . the following table presents stock-based compensation expense recorded in operation and maintenance expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>stock options</td><td>$ 1</td><td>$ 2</td><td>$ 2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>rsus</td><td>9</td><td>8</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nonqualified employee stock purchase plan</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>stock-based compensation</td><td>11</td><td>11</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>income tax benefit</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>stock-based compensation expense net of tax</td><td>$ 7</td><td>$ 7</td><td>$ 7</td></tr></table> there were no significant stock-based compensation costs capitalized during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 . the company receives a tax deduction based on the intrinsic value of the award at the exercise date for stock options and the distribution date for rsus . for each award , throughout the requisite service period , the company recognizes the tax benefits , which have been included in deferred income tax assets , related to compensation costs . the tax deductions in excess of the benefits recorded throughout the requisite service period are recorded to the consolidated statements of operations and are presented in the financing section of the consolidated statements of cash flows . stock options there were no grants of stock options to employees in 2017 . in 2016 and 2015 , the company granted non-qualified stock options to certain employees under the 2007 plan . the stock options vest ratably over the three-year service period beginning on january 1 of the year of the grant and have no performance vesting conditions . expense is recognized using the straight-line method and is amortized over the requisite service period. .\nQuestion: what was the income tax benefit in the years of 2015 to 2017?\nAnswer: -4.0\nQuestion: and what was the stock-based compensation in that period?\nAnswer: 11.0\nQuestion: what portion, then, did that benefit represent in relation to this compensation?\nAnswer: -0.36364\nQuestion: and what was that in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.36364" } ]
CONVFINQA4404	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhumana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) not be estimated based on observable market prices , and as such , unobservable inputs were used . for auction rate securities , valuation methodologies include consideration of the quality of the sector and issuer , underlying collateral , underlying final maturity dates , and liquidity . recently issued accounting pronouncements there are no recently issued accounting standards that apply to us or that will have a material impact on our results of operations , financial condition , or cash flows . 3 . acquisitions on december 21 , 2012 , we acquired metropolitan health networks , inc. , or metropolitan , a medical services organization , or mso , that coordinates medical care for medicare advantage beneficiaries and medicaid recipients , primarily in florida . we paid $ 11.25 per share in cash to acquire all of the outstanding shares of metropolitan and repaid all outstanding debt of metropolitan for a transaction value of $ 851 million , plus transaction expenses . the preliminary fair values of metropolitan 2019s assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition are summarized as follows : metropolitan ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>metropolitan ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 49</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>receivables net</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other current assets</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>property and equipment</td><td>22</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>goodwill</td><td>569</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets</td><td>263</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other long-term assets</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>972</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>-22 ( 22 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other long-term liabilities</td><td>-99 ( 99 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total liabilities assumed</td><td>-121 ( 121 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 851</td></tr></table> the goodwill was assigned to the health and well-being services segment and is not deductible for tax purposes . the other intangible assets , which primarily consist of customer contracts and trade names , have a weighted average useful life of 8.4 years . on october 29 , 2012 , we acquired a noncontrolling equity interest in mcci holdings , llc , or mcci , a privately held mso headquartered in miami , florida that coordinates medical care for medicare advantage and medicaid beneficiaries primarily in florida and texas . the metropolitan and mcci transactions are expected to provide us with components of a successful integrated care delivery model that has demonstrated scalability to new markets . a substantial portion of the revenues for both metropolitan and mcci are derived from services provided to humana medicare advantage members under capitation contracts with our health plans . in addition , metropolitan and mcci provide services to medicare advantage and medicaid members under capitation contracts with third party health plans . under these capitation agreements with humana and third party health plans , metropolitan and mcci assume financial risk associated with these medicare advantage and medicaid members. .\nQuestion: what is the value of cash and cash equivalents?\nAnswer: 49.0\nQuestion: what is the value of net receivables?\nAnswer: 28.0\nQuestion: what is the sum of those two values?\nAnswer: 77.0\nQuestion: what is the total including other current assets?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "117.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10345	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n9 . lease commitments the company leases certain land , facilities , equipment and software under various operating leases that expire at various dates through 2057 . the lease agreements frequently include renewal and escalation clauses and require the company to pay taxes , insurance and maintenance costs . total rental expense under operating leases was approximatelya $ 92.3 million in fiscal 2019 , $ 84.9 million in fiscal 2018 and $ 58.8 million in fiscal 2017 . the following is a schedule of futureff minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at november 2 , 2019 : operating fiscal years leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal years</td><td>operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2020</td><td>$ 79789</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2021</td><td>67993</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2022</td><td>40338</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2023</td><td>37673</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2024</td><td>32757</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>190171</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 448721</td></tr></table> 10 . commitments and contingencies from time to time , in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , among other things , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage , employment or employment benefits . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 11 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . defined contribution plans the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plans for u.s . employees was $ 47.7 million in fiscal 2019 , $ 41.4 million in fiscal 2018 and $ 35.8 million in fiscal 2017 . non-qualified deferred compensation plan the deferred compensation plan ( dcp ) allows certain members of management and other highly-compensated employees and non-employee directors to defer receipt of all or any portion of their compensation . the dcp was established to provide participants with the opportunity to defer receiving all or a portion of their compensation , which includes salary , bonus , commissions and director fees . under the dcp , the company provides all participants ( other than non-employee directors ) with company contributions equal to 8% ( 8 % ) of eligible deferred contributions . the dcp is a non-qualified plan that is maintained in a rabbi trust . the fair value of the investments held in the rabbi trust are presented separately as deferred compensation plan investments , with the current portion of the investment included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets . see note 2j , fair value , for further information on these investments . the deferred compensation obligation represents dcp participant accumulated deferrals and earnings thereon since the inception of the dcp net of withdrawals . the deferred compensation obligation is presented separately as deferred compensation plan liability , with the current portion of the obligation in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . the company 2019s liability under the dcp is an unsecured general obligation of the company . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what is the value of operating leases in 2020 divided by 1000?\nAnswer: 79.789\nQuestion: what was the value of the rent expense?\nAnswer: 92.3\nQuestion: what is the difference in values?\nAnswer: -12.511\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.13555" } ]
CONVFINQA8345	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\no 2019 r e i l l y a u t o m o t i v e 2 0 0 6 a n n u a l r e p o r t p a g e 38 $ 11080000 , in the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested awards at december 31 , 2006 , was $ 7702000 and the weighted-average period of time over which this cost will be recognized is 3.3 years . employee stock purchase plan the company 2019s employee stock purchase plan permits all eligible employees to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the fair market value . participants may authorize the company to withhold up to 5% ( 5 % ) of their annual salary to participate in the plan . the stock purchase plan authorizes up to 2600000 shares to be granted . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company issued 165306 shares under the purchase plan at a weighted average price of $ 27.36 per share . during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company issued 161903 shares under the purchase plan at a weighted average price of $ 27.57 per share . during the year ended december 31 , 2004 , the company issued 187754 shares under the purchase plan at a weighted average price of $ 20.85 per share . sfas no . 123r requires compensation expense to be recognized based on the discount between the grant date fair value and the employee purchase price for shares sold to employees . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded $ 799000 of compensation cost related to employee share purchases and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 295000 . at december 31 , 2006 , approximately 400000 shares were reserved for future issuance . other employee benefit plans the company sponsors a contributory profit sharing and savings plan that covers substantially all employees who are at least 21 years of age and have at least six months of service . the company has agreed to make matching contributions equal to 50% ( 50 % ) of the first 2% ( 2 % ) of each employee 2019s wages that are contributed and 25% ( 25 % ) of the next 4% ( 4 % ) of each employee 2019s wages that are contributed . the company also makes additional discretionary profit sharing contributions to the plan on an annual basis as determined by the board of directors . the company 2019s matching and profit sharing contributions under this plan are funded in the form of shares of the company 2019s common stock . a total of 4200000 shares of common stock have been authorized for issuance under this plan . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded $ 6429000 of compensation cost for contributions to this plan and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 2372000 . during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company recorded $ 6606000 of compensation cost for contributions to this plan and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 2444000 . during the year ended december 31 , 2004 , the company recorded $ 5278000 of compensation cost for contributions to this plan and a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 1969000 . the compensation cost recorded in 2006 includes matching contributions made in 2006 and profit sharing contributions accrued in 2006 to be funded with issuance of shares of common stock in 2007 . the company issued 204000 shares in 2006 to fund profit sharing and matching contributions at an average grant date fair value of $ 34.34 . the company issued 210461 shares in 2005 to fund profit sharing and matching contributions at an average grant date fair value of $ 25.79 . the company issued 238828 shares in 2004 to fund profit sharing and matching contributions at an average grant date fair value of $ 19.36 . a portion of these shares related to profit sharing contributions accrued in prior periods . at december 31 , 2006 , approximately 1061000 shares were reserved for future issuance under this plan . the company has in effect a performance incentive plan for the company 2019s senior management under which the company awards shares of restricted stock that vest equally over a three-year period and are held in escrow until such vesting has occurred . shares are forfeited when an employee ceases employment . a total of 800000 shares of common stock have been authorized for issuance under this plan . shares awarded under this plan are valued based on the market price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant and compensation cost is recorded over the vesting period . the company recorded $ 416000 of compensation cost for this plan for the year ended december 31 , 2006 and recognized a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 154000 . the company recorded $ 289000 of compensation cost for this plan for the year ended december 31 , 2005 and recognized a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 107000 . the company recorded $ 248000 of compensation cost for this plan for the year ended december 31 , 2004 and recognized a corresponding income tax benefit of $ 93000 . the total fair value of shares vested ( at vest date ) for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 were $ 503000 , $ 524000 and $ 335000 , respectively . the remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested awards at december 31 , 2006 was $ 536000 . the company awarded 18698 shares under this plan in 2006 with an average grant date fair value of $ 33.12 . the company awarded 14986 shares under this plan in 2005 with an average grant date fair value of $ 25.41 . the company awarded 15834 shares under this plan in 2004 with an average grant date fair value of $ 19.05 . compensation cost for shares awarded in 2006 will be recognized over the three-year vesting period . changes in the company 2019s restricted stock for the year ended december 31 , 2006 were as follows : weighted- average grant date shares fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares</td><td>weighted-average grant date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-vested at december 31 2005</td><td>15052</td><td>$ 22.68</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted during the period</td><td>18698</td><td>33.12</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested during the period</td><td>-15685 ( 15685 )</td><td>26.49</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited during the period</td><td>-1774 ( 1774 )</td><td>27.94</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-vested at december 31 2006</td><td>16291</td><td>$ 30.80</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2006 , approximately 659000 shares were reserved for future issuance under this plan . n o t e s t o c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( cont inued ) .\nQuestion: what was the percentage of non-vested restricted stock balance to total shares reserved for future issuance as of 12/31/06?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.02472" } ]
CONVFINQA8331	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstate street corporation \| 52 shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2012 . it also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available , capitalization-weighted index , comprised of 67 of the standard & poor 2019s 500 companies , representing 27 diversified financial services companies , 23 insurance companies , and 17 banking companies . the kbw bank index is a modified cap-weighted index consisting of 24 exchange-listed stocks , representing national money center banks and leading regional institutions. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>state street corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 159</td><td>$ 172</td><td>$ 148</td><td>$ 178</td><td>$ 227</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>132</td><td>151</td><td>153</td><td>171</td><td>208</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100</td><td>136</td><td>156</td><td>154</td><td>189</td><td>230</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100</td><td>138</td><td>151</td><td>151</td><td>195</td><td>231</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the price of state street corporation in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "227.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3366	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s valuation allowance: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at january 1 2011</td><td>$ 23788</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>1525</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-3734 ( 3734 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>$ 21579</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-2059 ( 2059 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31 2012</td><td>$ 19520</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-5965 ( 5965 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31 2013</td><td>$ 13555</td></tr></table> included in 2013 is a discrete tax benefit totaling $ 2979 associated with an entity re-organization within the company 2019s market-based segment that allowed for the utilization of state net operating loss carryforwards and the release of an associated valuation allowance . note 14 : employee benefits pension and other postretirement benefits the company maintains noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees of its regulated utility and shared services operations . benefits under the plans are based on the employee 2019s years of service and compensation . the pension plans have been closed for all employees . the pension plans were closed for most employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 had their accrued benefit frozen and will be able to receive this benefit as a lump sum upon termination or retirement . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 and non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 are provided with a 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) of base pay defined contribution plan . the company does not participate in a multiemployer plan . the company 2019s pension funding practice is to contribute at least the greater of the minimum amount required by the employee retirement income security act of 1974 or the normal cost . further , the company will consider additional contributions if needed to avoid 201cat risk 201d status and benefit restrictions under the pension protection act of 2006 . the company may also consider increased contributions , based on other financial requirements and the plans 2019 funded position . pension plan assets are invested in a number of actively managed and indexed investments including equity and bond mutual funds , fixed income securities , guaranteed interest contracts with insurance companies and real estate investment trusts ( 201creits 201d ) . pension expense in excess of the amount contributed to the pension plans is deferred by certain regulated subsidiaries pending future recovery in rates charged for utility services as contributions are made to the plans . ( see note 6 ) the company also has unfunded noncontributory supplemental non-qualified pension plans that provide additional retirement benefits to certain employees . the company maintains other postretirement benefit plans providing varying levels of medical and life insurance to eligible retirees . the retiree welfare plans are closed for union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . the plans had previously closed for non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2002 . the company 2019s policy is to fund other postretirement benefit costs for rate-making purposes . assets of the plans are invested in equity mutual funds , bond mutual funds and fixed income securities. .\nQuestion: what was the decrease in the tax position in 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3734.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4914	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard a0& poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index . the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december a031 , 2012 and that all dividends were reinvested . market performance . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company / index</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>teleflex incorporated</td><td>100</td><td>134</td><td>166</td><td>192</td><td>237</td><td>368</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>132</td><td>151</td><td>153</td><td>171</td><td>208</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index</td><td>100</td><td>128</td><td>161</td><td>171</td><td>181</td><td>238</td></tr></table> s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 128 161 171 181 238 .\nQuestion: what is the net change in value of the s&p 500 index from 2012 to 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "108.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5387	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmarathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements operating lease rental expense was : ( in millions ) 2008 2007 2006 minimum rental ( a ) $ 245 $ 209 $ 172 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>minimum rental ( a )</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 209</td><td>$ 172</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contingent rental</td><td>22</td><td>33</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>sublease rentals</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net rental expense</td><td>$ 267</td><td>$ 242</td><td>$ 193</td></tr></table> ( a ) excludes $ 5 million , $ 8 million and $ 9 million paid by united states steel in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 on assumed leases . 27 . contingencies and commitments we are the subject of , or party to , a number of pending or threatened legal actions , contingencies and commitments involving a variety of matters , including laws and regulations relating to the environment . certain of these matters are discussed below . the ultimate resolution of these contingencies could , individually or in the aggregate , be material to our consolidated financial statements . however , management believes that we will remain a viable and competitive enterprise even though it is possible that these contingencies could be resolved unfavorably . environmental matters 2013 we are subject to federal , state , local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the environment . these laws generally provide for control of pollutants released into the environment and require responsible parties to undertake remediation of hazardous waste disposal sites . penalties may be imposed for noncompliance . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , accrued liabilities for remediation totaled $ 111 million and $ 108 million . it is not presently possible to estimate the ultimate amount of all remediation costs that might be incurred or the penalties that may be imposed . receivables for recoverable costs from certain states , under programs to assist companies in clean-up efforts related to underground storage tanks at retail marketing outlets , were $ 60 and $ 66 million at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 . we are a defendant , along with other refining companies , in 20 cases arising in three states alleging damages for methyl tertiary-butyl ether ( 201cmtbe 201d ) contamination . we have also received seven toxic substances control act notice letters involving potential claims in two states . such notice letters are often followed by litigation . like the cases that were settled in 2008 , the remaining mtbe cases are consolidated in a multidistrict litigation in the southern district of new york for pretrial proceedings . nineteen of the remaining cases allege damages to water supply wells , similar to the damages claimed in the settled cases . in the other remaining case , the state of new jersey is seeking natural resources damages allegedly resulting from contamination of groundwater by mtbe . this is the only mtbe contamination case in which we are a defendant and natural resources damages are sought . we are vigorously defending these cases . we , along with a number of other defendants , have engaged in settlement discussions related to the majority of the cases in which we are a defendant . we do not expect our share of liability , if any , for the remaining cases to significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows . a lawsuit filed in the united states district court for the southern district of west virginia alleges that our catlettsburg , kentucky , refinery distributed contaminated gasoline to wholesalers and retailers for a period prior to august , 2003 , causing permanent damage to storage tanks , dispensers and related equipment , resulting in lost profits , business disruption and personal and real property damages . following the incident , we conducted remediation operations at affected facilities , and we deny that any permanent damages resulted from the incident . class action certification was granted in august 2007 . we have entered into a tentative settlement agreement in this case . notice of the proposed settlement has been sent to the class members . approval by the court after a fairness hearing is required before the settlement can be finalized . the fairness hearing is scheduled in the first quarter of 2009 . the proposed settlement will not significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows . guarantees 2013 we have provided certain guarantees , direct and indirect , of the indebtedness of other companies . under the terms of most of these guarantee arrangements , we would be required to perform should the guaranteed party fail to fulfill its obligations under the specified arrangements . in addition to these financial guarantees , we also have various performance guarantees related to specific agreements. .\nQuestion: what was the minimal rental value in 2008?\nAnswer: 245.0\nQuestion: what was the minimal rental value in 2006?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "172.0" } ]
CONVFINQA68	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nof exercise for stock options exercised or at period end for outstanding stock options , less the applicable exercise price . the company issued new shares to satisfy exercised stock options . compensation expense the company recorded $ 43 million , $ 34 million , and $ 44 million of expense related to stock awards for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively . the company recorded $ 17 million , $ 13 million , and $ 17 million as a tax benefit related to stock awards and stock options for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively . the company recognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , of $ 41 million , $ 53 million , and $ 32 million , respectively , from the issuance of stock in settlement of stock awards , and $ 4 million , $ 5 million , and $ 4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , respectively , from the exercise of stock options . unrecognized compensation expense as of december 31 , 2015 , the company had less than $ 1 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with rsrs granted in 2015 and 2014 , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.0 year , and $ 25 million of unrecognized expense associated with rpsrs granted in 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.6 years . as of december 31 , 2015 , the company had no unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options . compensation expense for stock options was fully recognized as of december 31 , 2013 . 20 . unaudited selected quarterly data unaudited quarterly financial results for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , are set forth in the following tables: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>year ended december 31 2015 1st qtr</td><td>year ended december 31 2015 2nd qtr ( 1 )</td><td>year ended december 31 2015 3rd qtr</td><td>year ended december 31 2015 4th qtr ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales and service revenues</td><td>$ 1570</td><td>$ 1745</td><td>$ 1800</td><td>$ 1905</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income ( loss )</td><td>156</td><td>269</td><td>200</td><td>144</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>earnings ( loss ) before income taxes</td><td>133</td><td>244</td><td>175</td><td>80</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net earnings ( loss )</td><td>87</td><td>156</td><td>111</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>dividends declared per share</td><td>$ 0.40</td><td>$ 0.40</td><td>$ 0.40</td><td>$ 0.50</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>basic earnings ( loss ) per share</td><td>$ 1.80</td><td>$ 3.22</td><td>$ 2.31</td><td>$ 1.07</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>diluted earnings ( loss ) per share</td><td>$ 1.79</td><td>$ 3.20</td><td>$ 2.29</td><td>$ 1.06</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in the second quarter of 2015 , the company recorded a $ 59 million goodwill impairment charge . during the same period , the company recorded $ 136 million of operating income as a result of the aon settlement . ( 2 ) in the fourth quarter of 2015 , the company recorded $ 16 million goodwill impairment and $ 27 million intangible asset impairment charges. .\nQuestion: what is the compensation expense the company recorded in 2015?\nAnswer: 43.0\nQuestion: what about in 2014?\nAnswer: 34.0\nQuestion: what is the total compensation expense the company recorded in 2015 and 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "77.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8731	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe table below summarizes activity of rsus with performance conditions for the year ended december 31 , shares ( in thousands ) weighted average grant date fair value ( per share ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares ( in thousands )</td><td>weightedaverage grantdate fair value ( per share )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-vested total as of december 31 2016</td><td>309</td><td>$ 55.94</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>186</td><td>63.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-204 ( 204 )</td><td>46.10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>70.50</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-vested total as of december 31 2017</td><td>281</td><td>$ 67.33</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested rsus , with and without performance conditions , is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.5 years . the total fair value of rsus , with and without performance conditions , vested was $ 16 million , $ 14 million and $ 12 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . if dividends are paid with respect to shares of the company 2019s common stock before the rsus are distributed , the company credits a liability for the value of the dividends that would have been paid if the rsus were shares of company common stock . when the rsus are distributed , the company pays the participant a lump sum cash payment equal to the value of the dividend equivalents accrued . the company accrued dividend equivalents totaling less than $ 1 million , $ 1 million and $ 1 million to accumulated deficit in the accompanying consolidated statements of changes in stockholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . employee stock purchase plan the company maintains a nonqualified employee stock purchase plan ( the 201cespp 201d ) through which employee participants may use payroll deductions to acquire company common stock at the lesser of 90% ( 90 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock at either the beginning or the end of a three-month purchase period . on february 15 , 2017 , the board adopted the american water works company , inc . and its designated subsidiaries 2017 nonqualified employee stock purchase plan , which was approved by stockholders on may 12 , 2017 and took effect on august 5 , 2017 . the prior plan was terminated as to new purchases of company stock effective august 31 , 2017 . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were 2.0 million shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the espp . the espp is considered compensatory . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , the company issued 93 thousand , 93 thousand and 98 thousand shares , respectively , under the espp. .\nQuestion: what was the difference between the non-vested rsu's of 2017 and of 2016?\nAnswer: -28.0\nQuestion: and what was the total of non-vested rsu's in 2016?\nAnswer: 309.0\nQuestion: how much does that difference represent in relation to this total?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.09061" } ]
CONVFINQA8677	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents hologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) the acquisition also provides for up to two annual earn-out payments not to exceed $ 15000 in the aggregate based on biolucent 2019s achievement of certain revenue targets . the company considered the provision of eitf 95-8 , and concluded that this contingent consideration represents additional purchase price . as a result , goodwill will be increased by the amount of the additional consideration , if any , as it is earned . as of september 26 , 2009 , the company has not recorded any amounts for these potential earn-outs . the allocation of the purchase price was based upon estimates of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of september 18 , 2007 . the components and allocation of the purchase price consisted of the following approximate amounts: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>net tangible assets acquired as of september 18 2007</td><td>$ 2800</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>developed technology and know how</td><td>12300</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>customer relationship</td><td>17000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trade name</td><td>2800</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>deferred income tax liabilities net</td><td>-9500 ( 9500 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>goodwill</td><td>47800</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>final purchase price</td><td>$ 73200</td></tr></table> as part of the purchase price allocation , all intangible assets that were a part of the acquisition were identified and valued . it was determined that only customer relationship , trade name and developed technology had separately identifiable values . the fair value of these intangible assets was determined through the application of the income approach . customer relationship represented a large customer base that was expected to purchase the disposable mammopad product on a regular basis . trade name represented the biolucent product name that the company intended to continue to use . developed technology represented currently marketable purchased products that the company continues to sell as well as utilize to enhance and incorporate into the company 2019s existing products . the deferred income tax liability relates to the tax effect of acquired identifiable intangible assets and fair value adjustments to acquired inventory , as such amounts are not deductible for tax purposes , partially offset by acquired net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $ 2400 . 4 . sale of gestiva on january 16 , 2008 , the company entered into a definitive agreement pursuant to which it agreed to sell full u.s . and world-wide rights to gestiva to k-v pharmaceutical company upon approval of the pending gestiva new drug application ( the 201cgestiva nda 201d ) by the fda for a purchase price of $ 82000 . the company received $ 9500 of the purchase price in fiscal 2008 , and the balance is due upon final approval of the gestiva nda by the fda on or before february 19 , 2010 and the production of a quantity of gestiva suitable to enable the commercial launch of the product . either party has the right to terminate the agreement if fda approval is not obtained by february 19 , 2010 . the company agreed to continue its efforts to obtain fda approval of the nda for gestiva as part of this arrangement . all costs incurred in these efforts will be reimbursed by k-v pharmaceutical and are being recorded as a credit against research and development expenses . during fiscal 2009 and 2008 , these reimbursed costs were not material . the company recorded the $ 9500 as a deferred gain within current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet . the company expects that the gain will be recognized upon the closing of the transaction following final fda approval of the gestiva nda or if the agreement is terminated . the company cannot assure that it will be able to obtain the requisite fda approval , that the transaction will be completed or that it will receive the balance of the purchase price . moreover , if k-v pharmaceutical terminates the agreement as a result of a breach by the company of a material representation , warranty , covenant or agreement , the company will be required to return the funds previously received as well as expenses reimbursed by k-v . source : hologic inc , 10-k , november 24 , 2009 powered by morningstar ae document research 2120 the information contained herein may not be copied , adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate , complete or timely . the user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information , except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law . past financial performance is no guarantee of future results. .\nQuestion: what amount is dedicated to goodwill?\nAnswer: 47800.0\nQuestion: what about the total purchase price?\nAnswer: 73200.0\nQuestion: what portion of total price is for goodwill?\nAnswer: 0.65301\nQuestion: what portion of total purchase price is dedicate to developed technology and know how?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.16803" } ]
CONVFINQA7075	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nitem 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2016 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 and that all dividends were reinvested. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loews common stock</td><td>100.0</td><td>108.91</td><td>129.64</td><td>113.59</td><td>104.47</td><td>128.19</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.0</td><td>116.00</td><td>153.57</td><td>174.60</td><td>177.01</td><td>198.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loews peer group ( a )</td><td>100.0</td><td>113.39</td><td>142.85</td><td>150.44</td><td>142.44</td><td>165.34</td></tr></table> ( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : chubb limited ( name change from ace limited after it acquired the chubb corporation on january 15 , 2016 ) , w.r . berkley corporation , the chubb corporation ( included through january 15 , 2016 when it was acquired by ace limited ) , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p . ( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2016 and 2015. .\nQuestion: what was the value of the s&p index in 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "116.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8953	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nyear ended december 31 , 2010 compared to year ended december 31 , 2009 net revenues increased $ 207.5 million , or 24.2% ( 24.2 % ) , to $ 1063.9 million in 2010 from $ 856.4 million in 2009 . net revenues by product category are summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2010</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2009</td><td>year ended december 31 , $ change</td><td>year ended december 31 , % ( % ) change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apparel</td><td>$ 853493</td><td>$ 651779</td><td>$ 201714</td><td>30.9% ( 30.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>footwear</td><td>127175</td><td>136224</td><td>-9049 ( 9049 )</td><td>-6.6 ( 6.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accessories</td><td>43882</td><td>35077</td><td>8805</td><td>25.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total net sales</td><td>1024550</td><td>823080</td><td>201470</td><td>24.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>license revenues</td><td>39377</td><td>33331</td><td>6046</td><td>18.1</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total net revenues</td><td>$ 1063927</td><td>$ 856411</td><td>$ 207516</td><td>24.2% ( 24.2 % )</td></tr></table> net sales increased $ 201.5 million , or 24.5% ( 24.5 % ) , to $ 1024.6 million in 2010 from $ 823.1 million in 2009 as noted in the table above . the increase in net sales primarily reflects : 2022 $ 88.9 million , or 56.8% ( 56.8 % ) , increase in direct to consumer sales , which includes 19 additional stores in 2010 ; and 2022 unit growth driven by increased distribution and new offerings in multiple product categories , most significantly in our training , base layer , mountain , golf and underwear categories ; partially offset by 2022 $ 9.0 million decrease in footwear sales driven primarily by a decline in running and training footwear sales . license revenues increased $ 6.1 million , or 18.1% ( 18.1 % ) , to $ 39.4 million in 2010 from $ 33.3 million in 2009 . this increase in license revenues was primarily a result of increased sales by our licensees due to increased distribution and continued unit volume growth . we have developed our own headwear and bags , and beginning in 2011 , these products are being sold by us rather than by one of our licensees . gross profit increased $ 120.4 million to $ 530.5 million in 2010 from $ 410.1 million in 2009 . gross profit as a percentage of net revenues , or gross margin , increased 200 basis points to 49.9% ( 49.9 % ) in 2010 compared to 47.9% ( 47.9 % ) in 2009 . the increase in gross margin percentage was primarily driven by the following : 2022 approximate 100 basis point increase driven by increased direct to consumer higher margin sales ; 2022 approximate 50 basis point increase driven by decreased sales markdowns and returns , primarily due to improved sell-through rates at retail ; and 2022 approximate 50 basis point increase driven primarily by liquidation sales and related inventory reserve reversals . the current year period benefited from reversals of inventory reserves established in the prior year relative to certain cleated footwear , sport specific apparel and gloves . these products have historically been more difficult to liquidate at favorable prices . selling , general and administrative expenses increased $ 93.3 million to $ 418.2 million in 2010 from $ 324.9 million in 2009 . as a percentage of net revenues , selling , general and administrative expenses increased to 39.3% ( 39.3 % ) in 2010 from 37.9% ( 37.9 % ) in 2009 . these changes were primarily attributable to the following : 2022 marketing costs increased $ 19.3 million to $ 128.2 million in 2010 from $ 108.9 million in 2009 primarily due to an increase in sponsorship of events and collegiate and professional teams and athletes , increased television and digital campaign costs , including media campaigns for specific customers and additional personnel costs . in addition , we incurred increased expenses for our performance incentive plan as compared to the prior year . as a percentage of net revenues , marketing costs decreased to 12.0% ( 12.0 % ) in 2010 from 12.7% ( 12.7 % ) in 2009 primarily due to decreased marketing costs for specific customers. .\nQuestion: what was the gross profit in 2010?\nAnswer: 530.5\nQuestion: and what was it in 2009?\nAnswer: 120.4\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "410.1" } ]
CONVFINQA4950	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nunconditional purchase obligations approximately $ 390 of our long-term unconditional purchase obligations relate to feedstock supply for numerous hyco ( hydrogen , carbon monoxide , and syngas ) facilities . the price of feedstock supply is principally related to the price of natural gas . however , long-term take-or-pay sales contracts to hyco customers are generally matched to the term of the feedstock supply obligations and provide recovery of price increases in the feedstock supply . due to the matching of most long-term feedstock supply obligations to customer sales contracts , we do not believe these purchase obligations would have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations . refer to note 17 , commitments and contingencies , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on our unconditional purchase obligations . the unconditional purchase obligations also include other product supply and purchase commitments and electric power and natural gas supply purchase obligations , which are primarily pass-through contracts with our customers . in addition , purchase commitments to spend approximately $ 540 for additional plant and equipment are included in the unconditional purchase obligations in 2016 . we also purchase materials , energy , capital equipment , supplies , and services as part of the ordinary course of business under arrangements that are not unconditional purchase obligations . the majority of such purchases are for raw materials and energy , which are obtained under requirements-type contracts at market prices . obligation for future contribution to an equity affiliate on 19 april 2015 , a joint venture between air products and acwa holding entered into a 20-year oxygen and nitrogen supply agreement to supply saudi aramco 2019s oil refinery and power plant being built in jazan , saudi arabia . air products owns 25% ( 25 % ) of the joint venture and guarantees the repayment of its share of an equity bridge loan . in total , we expect to invest approximately $ 100 in this joint venture . as of 30 september 2015 , we recorded a noncurrent liability of $ 67.5 for our obligation to make future equity contributions based on advances received by the joint venture under the loan . income tax liabilities noncurrent deferred income tax liabilities as of 30 september 2015 were $ 903.3 . tax liabilities related to unrecognized tax benefits as of 30 september 2015 were $ 97.5 . these tax liabilities were excluded from the contractual obligations table , as it is impractical to determine a cash impact by year given that payments will vary according to changes in tax laws , tax rates , and our operating results . in addition , there are uncertainties in timing of the effective settlement of our uncertain tax positions with respective taxing authorities . refer to note 23 , income taxes , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information . pension benefits the company sponsors defined benefit pension plans and defined contribution plans that cover a substantial portion of its worldwide employees . the principal defined benefit pension plans 2014the u.s . salaried pension plan and the u.k . pension plan 2014were closed to new participants in 2005 and were replaced with defined contribution plans . over the long run , the shift to defined contribution plans is expected to reduce volatility of both plan expense and contributions . the fair market value of plan assets for our defined benefit pension plans as of the 30 september 2015 measurement date decreased to $ 3916.4 from $ 4114.6 at the end of fiscal year 2014 . the projected benefit obligation for these plans was $ 4787.8 and $ 4738.6 at the end of the fiscal years 2015 and 2014 , respectively . refer to note 16 , retirement benefits , to the consolidated financial statements for comprehensive and detailed disclosures on our postretirement benefits . pension expense . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension expense</td><td>$ 135.6</td><td>$ 135.9</td><td>$ 169.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>special terminations settlements and curtailments ( included above )</td><td>35.2</td><td>5.8</td><td>19.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average discount rate</td><td>4.0% ( 4.0 % )</td><td>4.6% ( 4.6 % )</td><td>4.0% ( 4.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets</td><td>7.4% ( 7.4 % )</td><td>7.7% ( 7.7 % )</td><td>7.7% ( 7.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted average expected rate of compensation increase</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>3.9% ( 3.9 % )</td><td>3.8% ( 3.8 % )</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the fair market value of plan assets of the benefit pension plans in 2015?\nAnswer: 3916.4\nQuestion: and what was it in 2014?\nAnswer: 4114.6\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-198.2" } ]
CONVFINQA2205	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) basis step-up from corporate restructuring represents the tax effects of increasing the basis for tax purposes of certain of the company 2019s assets in conjunction with its spin-off from american radio systems corporation , its former parent company . at december 31 , 2003 , the company had net federal and state operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income of approximately $ 0.9 billion and $ 1.5 billion , respectively . if not utilized , the company 2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>federal</td><td>state</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2004 to 2008</td><td>$ 1451</td><td>$ 483578</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009 to 2013</td><td>12234</td><td>66666</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014 to 2018</td><td>10191</td><td>235589</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2019 to 2023</td><td>903010</td><td>728139</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 926886</td><td>$ 1513972</td></tr></table> sfas no . 109 , 201caccounting for income taxes , 201d requires that companies record a valuation allowance when it is 201cmore likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . 201d at december 31 , 2003 , the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $ 156.7 million , primarily related to net state deferred tax assets , capital loss carryforwards and the lost tax benefit and costs associated with our tax refund claims . the company has not provided a valuation allowance for the remaining net deferred tax assets , primarily its tax refund claims and federal net operating loss carryforwards , as management believes the company will be successful with its tax refund claims and have sufficient time to realize these federal net operating loss carryforwards during the twenty-year tax carryforward period . the company intends to recover a portion of its deferred tax asset through its tax refund claims , related to certain federal net operating losses , filed during 2003 as part of a tax planning strategy implemented in 2002 . the recoverability of its remaining net deferred tax asset has been assessed utilizing stable state ( no growth ) projections based on its current operations . the projections show a significant decrease in depreciation and interest expense in the later years of the carryforward period as a result of a significant portion of its assets being fully depreciated during the first fifteen years of the carryforward period and debt repayments reducing interest expense . accordingly , the recoverability of the net deferred tax asset is not dependent on material improvements to operations , material asset sales or other non-routine transactions . based on its current outlook of future taxable income during the carryforward period , management believes that the net deferred tax asset will be realized . the realization of the company 2019s deferred tax assets will be dependent upon its ability to generate approximately $ 1.0 billion in taxable income from january 1 , 2004 to december 31 , 2023 . if the company is unable to generate sufficient taxable income in the future , or carry back losses as described above , it will be required to reduce its net deferred tax asset through a charge to income tax expense , which would result in a corresponding decrease in stockholders 2019 equity . depending on the resolution of the verestar bankruptcy proceedings described in note 2 , the company may be entitled to a worthless stock or bad debt deduction for its investment in verestar . no income tax benefit has been provided for these potential deductions due to the uncertainty surrounding the bankruptcy proceedings . 13 . stockholders 2019 equity preferred stock as of december 31 , 2003 the company was authorized to issue up to 20.0 million shares of $ .01 par value preferred stock . as of december 31 , 2003 and 2002 there were no preferred shares issued or outstanding. .\nQuestion: what is the amount of the state operating loss carryforwards that expires between 2004 and 2008?\nAnswer: 483578.0\nQuestion: and what is the total of that state operating loss carryforwards?\nAnswer: 1513972.0\nQuestion: what is, then, that amount as a portion of this total?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.31941" } ]
CONVFINQA2615	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncourse of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities . the counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions . we establish credit limits for each counterparty . our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative financial instruments . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . value at risk the estimates in the table below are intended to measure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions . a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures . the models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confidence level . the var calculation used historical interest and foreign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future . the market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set . the calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur . further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely correlates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally offset by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure . the positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; commodity swaps , futures , and options ; and equity instruments . the calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are offset by these market-risk-sensitive instruments . the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 27 , 2018 and may 28 , 2017 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 27 , 2018. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>fair value impact may 27 2018</td><td>fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2018</td><td>fair value impact may 282017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rate instruments</td><td>$ 33.2</td><td>$ 27.5</td><td>$ 25.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign currency instruments</td><td>21.3</td><td>23.1</td><td>24.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commodity instruments</td><td>1.9</td><td>2.1</td><td>3.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>equity instruments</td><td>2.0</td><td>1.4</td><td>1.3</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the total of interest rate instruments as of may 2018?\nAnswer: 33.2\nQuestion: and what was it in may of the previous year?\nAnswer: 25.1\nQuestion: by how much, then, did it increase?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "8.1" } ]
CONVFINQA1488	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2022 the ability to identify suitable acquisition candidates and the ability to finance such acquisitions , which depends upon the availability of adequate cash reserves from operations or of acceptable financing terms and the variability of our stock price ; 2022 our ability to integrate any acquired business 2019 operations , services , clients , and personnel ; 2022 the effect of our substantial leverage , which may limit the funds available to make acquisitions and invest in our business ; 2022 changes in , or the failure to comply with , government regulations , including privacy regulations ; and 2022 other risks detailed elsewhere in this risk factors section and in our other filings with the securities and exchange commission . we are not under any obligation ( and expressly disclaim any such obligation ) to update or alter our forward- looking statements , whether as a result of new information , future events or otherwise . you should carefully consider the possibility that actual results may differ materially from our forward-looking statements . item 1b . unresolved staff comments . item 2 . properties . our corporate headquarters are located in jacksonville , florida , in an owned facility . fnf occupies and pays us rent for approximately 86000 square feet in this facility . we lease office space as follows : number of locations ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>state</td><td>number of locations ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>california</td><td>44</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>texas</td><td>21</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>florida</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>georgia new york</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>new jersey</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>illinois massachusetts</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>alabama arizona minnesota north carolina</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>64</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) represents the number of locations in each state listed . we also lease approximately 72 locations outside the united states . we believe our properties are adequate for our business as presently conducted . item 3 . legal proceedings . in the ordinary course of business , the company is involved in various pending and threatened litigation matters related to operations , some of which include claims for punitive or exemplary damages . the company believes that no actions , other than the matters listed below , depart from customary litigation incidental to its business . as background to the disclosure below , please note the following : 2022 these matters raise difficult and complicated factual and legal issues and are subject to many uncertainties and complexities . 2022 the company reviews these matters on an on-going basis and follows the provisions of statement of financial accounting standards no . 5 , accounting for contingencies ( 201csfas 5 201d ) , when making accrual and disclosure decisions . when assessing reasonably possible and probable outcomes , the company bases decisions on the assessment of the ultimate outcome following all appeals. .\nQuestion: what is the total number of leased locations?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "136.0" } ]
CONVFINQA76	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nvalue , which may be maturity , the company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 . gross realized gains and losses for 2005 were $ 15000 and $ 75000 , respectively . gross realized gains and losses for 2004 were $ 628000 and $ 205000 , respectively . gross realized gains for 2003 were $ 1249000 . there were no gross realized losses for 2003 . maturities stated are effective maturities . f . restricted cash at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , the company held $ 41482000 and $ 49847000 , respectively , in restricted cash . at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 the balance was held in deposit with certain banks predominantly to collateralize conditional stand-by letters of credit in the names of the company's landlords pursuant to certain operating lease agreements . g . property and equipment property and equipment consist of the following at december 31 ( in thousands ) : depreciation expense for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 was $ 26307000 , $ 28353000 and $ 27988000 respectively . in 2005 and 2004 , the company wrote off certain assets that were fully depreciated and no longer utilized . there was no effect on the company's net property and equipment . additionally , the company wrote off or sold certain assets that were not fully depreciated . the net loss on disposal of those assets was $ 344000 for 2005 and $ 43000 for 2004 . h . investments in accordance with the company's policy , as outlined in note b , \"accounting policies\" the company assessed its investment in altus pharmaceuticals , inc . ( \"altus\" ) , which it accounts for using the cost method , and determined that there had not been any adjustments to the fair values of that investment which would indicate a decrease in its fair value below the carrying value that would require the company to write down the investment basis of the asset , as of december 31 , 2005 and december 31 , 2004 . the company's cost basis carrying value in its outstanding equity and warrants of altus was $ 18863000 at december 31 , 2005 and 2004. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>furniture and equipment</td><td>$ 98387</td><td>$ 90893</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>leasehold improvements</td><td>66318</td><td>65294</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>computers</td><td>18971</td><td>18421</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>software</td><td>18683</td><td>16411</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total property and equipment gross</td><td>202359</td><td>191019</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>less accumulated depreciation and amortization</td><td>147826</td><td>126794</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total property and equipment net</td><td>$ 54533</td><td>$ 64225</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the net loss on disposal of assets in 2005?\nAnswer: 344000.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2004?\nAnswer: 43000.0\nQuestion: what was the change in value?\nAnswer: 301000.0\nQuestion: what was the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "7.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7671	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( a ) excludes discontinued operations . ( b ) earnings before interest expense and taxes as a percent of average total assets . ( c ) total debt as a percent of the sum of total debt , shareholders 2019 equity and non-current deferred income tax liabilities . the results above include the impact of the specified items detailed below . additional discussion regarding the specified items in fiscal years 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are provided in item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars except per share amounts</td><td>years ended september 30 2017</td><td>years ended september 30 2016</td><td>years ended september 30 2015</td><td>years ended september 30 2014</td><td>years ended september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total specified items</td><td>$ 1466</td><td>$ 1261</td><td>$ 1186</td><td>$ 153</td><td>$ 442</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>after-tax impact of specified items</td><td>$ 971</td><td>$ 892</td><td>$ 786</td><td>$ 101</td><td>$ 279</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>impact of specified items on diluted earnings per share</td><td>$ -4.34 ( 4.34 )</td><td>$ -4.10 ( 4.10 )</td><td>$ -3.79 ( 3.79 )</td><td>$ -0.51 ( 0.51 )</td><td>$ -1.40 ( 1.40 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>impact of dilution from share issuances</td><td>$ -0.54 ( 0.54 )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -0.02 ( 0.02 )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr></table> item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations the following commentary should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes . within the tables presented throughout this discussion , certain columns may not add due to the use of rounded numbers for disclosure purposes . percentages and earnings per share amounts presented are calculated from the underlying amounts . references to years throughout this discussion relate to our fiscal years , which end on september 30 . company overview description of the company and business segments becton , dickinson and company ( 201cbd 201d ) is a global medical technology company engaged in the development , manufacture and sale of a broad range of medical supplies , devices , laboratory equipment and diagnostic products used by healthcare institutions , life science researchers , clinical laboratories , the pharmaceutical industry and the general public . the company's organizational structure is based upon two principal business segments , bd medical ( 201cmedical 201d ) and bd life sciences ( 201clife sciences 201d ) . bd 2019s products are manufactured and sold worldwide . our products are marketed in the united states and internationally through independent distribution channels and directly to end-users by bd and independent sales representatives . we organize our operations outside the united states as follows : europe ; ema ( which includes the commonwealth of independent states , the middle east and africa ) ; greater asia ( which includes japan and asia pacific ) ; latin america ( which includes mexico , central america , the caribbean , and south america ) ; and canada . we continue to pursue growth opportunities in emerging markets , which include the following geographic regions : eastern europe , the middle east , africa , latin america and certain countries within asia pacific . we are primarily focused on certain countries whose healthcare systems are expanding , in particular , china and india . strategic objectives bd remains focused on delivering sustainable growth and shareholder value , while making appropriate investments for the future . bd management operates the business consistent with the following core strategies : 2022 to increase revenue growth by focusing on our core products , services and solutions that deliver greater benefits to patients , healthcare workers and researchers; .\nQuestion: what is the tax amount related to total specified items in 2017?\nAnswer: 495.0\nQuestion: what is the tax amount related to total specified items in 2017?\nAnswer: 495.0\nQuestion: what is the amount for total specified items in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1466.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9510	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnews corporation notes to the consolidated financial statements as of june 30 , 2016 , the company had income tax net operating loss carryforwards ( nols ) ( gross , net of uncertain tax benefits ) , in various jurisdictions as follows : jurisdiction expiration amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>jurisdiction</td><td>expiration</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . federal</td><td>2021 to 2036</td><td>$ 858</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . states</td><td>various</td><td>581</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>australia</td><td>indefinite</td><td>452</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>u.k .</td><td>indefinite</td><td>134</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other foreign</td><td>various</td><td>346</td></tr></table> utilization of the nols is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income from our operations in each of the respective jurisdictions to which the nols relate , while taking into account limitations and/or restrictions on our ability to use them . certain of our u.s . federal nols were acquired as part of the acquisitions of move and harlequin and are subject to limitations as promulgated under section 382 of the code . section 382 of the code limits the amount of acquired nols that we can use on an annual basis to offset future u.s . consolidated taxable income . the nols are also subject to review by relevant tax authorities in the jurisdictions to which they relate . the company recorded a deferred tax asset of $ 580 million and $ 540 million ( net of approximately $ 53 million and $ 95 million , respectively , of unrecognized tax benefits ) associated with its nols as of june 30 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . significant judgment is applied in assessing our ability to realize our nols and other tax assets . management assesses the available positive and negative evidence to estimate if sufficient future taxable income will be generated to utilize existing deferred tax assets within the applicable expiration period . on the basis of this evaluation , valuation allowances of $ 97 million and $ 304 million have been established to reduce the deferred tax asset associated with the company 2019s nols to an amount that will more likely than not be realized as of june 30 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the amount of the nol deferred tax asset considered realizable , however , could be adjusted if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced or if objective negative evidence in the form of cumulative losses occurs . as of june 30 , 2016 , the company had approximately $ 1.6 billion and $ 1.7 billion of capital loss carryforwards in australia and the u.k. , respectively , which may be carried forward indefinitely and which are subject to tax authority review . realization of our capital losses is dependent on generating capital gain taxable income and satisfying certain continuity of business requirements . the company recorded a deferred tax asset of $ 803 million and $ 892 million as of june 30 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively for these capital loss carryforwards , however , it is more likely than not that the company will not generate capital gain income in the normal course of business in these jurisdictions . accordingly , valuation allowances of $ 803 million and $ 892 million have been established to reduce the capital loss carryforward deferred tax asset to an amount that will more likely than not be realized as of june 30 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . as of june 30 , 2016 , the company had approximately $ 26 million of u.s . federal tax credit carryforward which includes $ 22 million of foreign tax credits and $ 4 million of research & development credits which begin to expire in 2025 and 2036 , respectively . as of june 30 , 2016 , the company had approximately $ 5 million of non-u.s . tax credit carryforwards which expire in various amounts beginning in 2025 and $ 8 million of state tax credit carryforwards ( net of u.s . federal benefit ) , of which the balance can be carried forward indefinitely . in accordance with the company 2019s accounting policy , a valuation allowance of $ 5 million has been established to reduce the deferred tax asset associated with the company 2019s non-u.s . and state credit carryforwards to an amount that will more likely than not be realized as of june 30 , 2016. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the company recorded deferred tax asset associated with its nols from 2015 to 2016?\nAnswer: 40.0\nQuestion: and what is this change as a percent of that tax asset in 2015?\nAnswer: 0.07407\nQuestion: and as of june 30 of the last year of that period, how much did the u.s . federal net operating loss carry forwards represent in relation to the states one?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.47676" } ]
CONVFINQA1600	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\njpmorgan chase & co./2017 annual report 53 net interest income excluding cib 2019s markets businesses in addition to reviewing net interest income on a managed basis , management also reviews net interest income excluding net interest income arising from cib 2019s markets businesses to assess the performance of the firm 2019s lending , investing ( including asset-liability management ) and deposit-raising activities . this net interest income is referred to as non-markets related net interest income . cib 2019s markets businesses are fixed income markets and equity markets . management believes that disclosure of non-markets related net interest income provides investors and analysts with another measure by which to analyze the non-markets-related business trends of the firm and provides a comparable measure to other financial institutions that are primarily focused on lending , investing and deposit-raising activities . the data presented below are non-gaap financial measures due to the exclusion of markets related net interest income arising from cib . year ended december 31 , ( in millions , except rates ) 2017 2016 2015 net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) $ 51410 $ 47292 $ 44620 less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) 4630 6334 5298 net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) $ 46780 $ 40958 $ 39322 average interest-earning assets $ 2180592 $ 2101604 $ 2088242 less : average cib markets interest-earning assets ( c ) 540835 520307 510292 average interest-earning assets excluding cib markets $ 1639757 $ 1581297 $ 1577950 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis 2.36% ( 2.36 % ) 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) 2.14% ( 2.14 % ) net interest yield on average cib markets interest-earning assets ( c ) 0.86 1.22 1.04 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets excluding cib markets 2.85% ( 2.85 % ) 2.59% ( 2.59 % ) 2.49% ( 2.49 % ) ( a ) interest includes the effect of related hedges . taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable . ( b ) for a reconciliation of net interest income on a reported and managed basis , see reconciliation from the firm 2019s reported u.s . gaap results to managed basis on page 52 . ( c ) the amounts in this table differ from the prior-period presentation to align with cib 2019s markets businesses . for further information on cib 2019s markets businesses , see page 65 . calculation of certain u.s . gaap and non-gaap financial measures certain u.s . gaap and non-gaap financial measures are calculated as follows : book value per share ( 201cbvps 201d ) common stockholders 2019 equity at period-end / common shares at period-end overhead ratio total noninterest expense / total net revenue return on assets ( 201croa 201d ) reported net income / total average assets return on common equity ( 201croe 201d ) net income* / average common stockholders 2019 equity return on tangible common equity ( 201crotce 201d ) net income* / average tangible common equity tangible book value per share ( 201ctbvps 201d ) tangible common equity at period-end / common shares at period-end * represents net income applicable to common equity . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 ( in millions except rates )</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b )</td><td>$ 51410</td><td>$ 47292</td><td>$ 44620</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : cib markets net interest income ( c )</td><td>4630</td><td>6334</td><td>5298</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net interest income excluding cib markets ( a )</td><td>$ 46780</td><td>$ 40958</td><td>$ 39322</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average interest-earning assets</td><td>$ 2180592</td><td>$ 2101604</td><td>$ 2088242</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less : average cib markets interest-earning assets ( c )</td><td>540835</td><td>520307</td><td>510292</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>average interest-earning assets excluding cib markets</td><td>$ 1639757</td><td>$ 1581297</td><td>$ 1577950</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis</td><td>2.36% ( 2.36 % )</td><td>2.25% ( 2.25 % )</td><td>2.14% ( 2.14 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net interest yield on average cib markets interest-earning assets ( c )</td><td>0.86</td><td>1.22</td><td>1.04</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net interest yield on average interest-earning assets excluding cib markets</td><td>2.85% ( 2.85 % )</td><td>2.59% ( 2.59 % )</td><td>2.49% ( 2.49 % )</td></tr></table> jpmorgan chase & co./2017 annual report 53 net interest income excluding cib 2019s markets businesses in addition to reviewing net interest income on a managed basis , management also reviews net interest income excluding net interest income arising from cib 2019s markets businesses to assess the performance of the firm 2019s lending , investing ( including asset-liability management ) and deposit-raising activities . this net interest income is referred to as non-markets related net interest income . cib 2019s markets businesses are fixed income markets and equity markets . management believes that disclosure of non-markets related net interest income provides investors and analysts with another measure by which to analyze the non-markets-related business trends of the firm and provides a comparable measure to other financial institutions that are primarily focused on lending , investing and deposit-raising activities . the data presented below are non-gaap financial measures due to the exclusion of markets related net interest income arising from cib . year ended december 31 , ( in millions , except rates ) 2017 2016 2015 net interest income 2013 managed basis ( a ) ( b ) $ 51410 $ 47292 $ 44620 less : cib markets net interest income ( c ) 4630 6334 5298 net interest income excluding cib markets ( a ) $ 46780 $ 40958 $ 39322 average interest-earning assets $ 2180592 $ 2101604 $ 2088242 less : average cib markets interest-earning assets ( c ) 540835 520307 510292 average interest-earning assets excluding cib markets $ 1639757 $ 1581297 $ 1577950 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets 2013 managed basis 2.36% ( 2.36 % ) 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) 2.14% ( 2.14 % ) net interest yield on average cib markets interest-earning assets ( c ) 0.86 1.22 1.04 net interest yield on average interest-earning assets excluding cib markets 2.85% ( 2.85 % ) 2.59% ( 2.59 % ) 2.49% ( 2.49 % ) ( a ) interest includes the effect of related hedges . taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable . ( b ) for a reconciliation of net interest income on a reported and managed basis , see reconciliation from the firm 2019s reported u.s . gaap results to managed basis on page 52 . ( c ) the amounts in this table differ from the prior-period presentation to align with cib 2019s markets businesses . for further information on cib 2019s markets businesses , see page 65 . calculation of certain u.s . gaap and non-gaap financial measures certain u.s . gaap and non-gaap financial measures are calculated as follows : book value per share ( 201cbvps 201d ) common stockholders 2019 equity at period-end / common shares at period-end overhead ratio total noninterest expense / total net revenue return on assets ( 201croa 201d ) reported net income / total average assets return on common equity ( 201croe 201d ) net income* / average common stockholders 2019 equity return on tangible common equity ( 201crotce 201d ) net income* / average tangible common equity tangible book value per share ( 201ctbvps 201d ) tangible common equity at period-end / common shares at period-end * represents net income applicable to common equity .\nQuestion: what fraction of the total net interest income 2013 managed basis is related to the cib markets net interest income in 2016?\nAnswer: 0.13393\nQuestion: what is the average interest-earning assets excluding cib markets in 2017?\nAnswer: 1639757.0\nQuestion: what about in 2016?\nAnswer: 1581297.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 58460.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.03697" } ]
CONVFINQA3299	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 26 , 2015 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 24 , 2010 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on 9/25/10 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019scommon stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2015 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2015 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september september september september september september . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 2010</td><td>september 2011</td><td>september 2012</td><td>september 2013</td><td>september 2014</td><td>september 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>apple inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 229</td><td>$ 170</td><td>$ 254</td><td>$ 294</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 101</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 157</td><td>$ 188</td><td>$ 187</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p information technology index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 104</td><td>$ 137</td><td>$ 147</td><td>$ 190</td><td>$ 194</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>dow jones u.s . technology supersector index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 134</td><td>$ 141</td><td>$ 183</td><td>$ 183</td></tr></table> apple inc . \| 2015 form 10-k \| 21 .\nQuestion: what is the net change of an investment in apple from 2010 to 2015?\nAnswer: 194.0\nQuestion: what is the initial investment?\nAnswer: 100.0\nQuestion: what rate of return does this represent?\nAnswer: 1.94\nQuestion: what about the net change of an investment in s&p500 index from 2010 to 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "87.0" } ]
CONVFINQA187	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart i the following table details the growth in global weighted average berths and the global , north american and european cruise guests over the past five years : weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths global cruise guests ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) european cruise guests ( 3 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths</td><td>globalcruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>north americancruiseguests ( 2 )</td><td>europeancruiseguests ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>363000</td><td>84050</td><td>17340000</td><td>10198000</td><td>5000000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>391000</td><td>92300</td><td>18800000</td><td>10781000</td><td>5540000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>412000</td><td>92650</td><td>20227000</td><td>11625000</td><td>5894000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>425000</td><td>98650</td><td>20898000</td><td>11640000</td><td>6139000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>432000</td><td>98750</td><td>21300000</td><td>11816000</td><td>6399000</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally are based on a com- bination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider , cruise industry news and cruise line international association ( 201cclia 201d ) . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) source : cruise line international association based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights for years 2009 through 2012 . year 2013 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . includes the united states of america and canada . ( 3 ) source : clia europe , formerly european cruise council , for years 2009 through 2012 . year 2013 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . north america the majority of cruise guests are sourced from north america , which represented approximately 56% ( 56 % ) of global cruise guests in 2013 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) from 2009 to 2013 . europe cruise guests sourced from europe represented approximately 30% ( 30 % ) of global cruise guests in 2013 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) from 2009 to 2013 . other markets in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe . based on industry data , cruise guests sourced from the asia/pacific region represented approximately 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) of global cruise guests in 2013 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 15% ( 15 % ) from 2011 to 2013 . competition we compete with a number of cruise lines . our princi- pal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise lines , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line and oceania cruises . cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consumers 2019 leisure time . demand for such activities is influenced by political and general economic conditions . com- panies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending . operating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , order to enhance our revenues , our brands globally , expenditures and ensure adequate cash and liquid- ity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , ization and maintenance of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while prudently expanding our fleet with new state-of- the-art cruise ships , ships by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , service customer preferences and expectations in an innovative manner , while supporting our strategic focus on profitability , and .\nQuestion: in 2013, what was the total of global cruise guests from either north america or europe?\nAnswer: 18215000.0\nQuestion: and what was the total of all global cruise guests?\nAnswer: 21300000.0\nQuestion: what was the number, then, of global cruise guests that weren't from either of those places?\nAnswer: 3085000.0\nQuestion: as of that same year, what portion of the global berths were from royal caribbean?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.22859" } ]
CONVFINQA5388	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmarathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements operating lease rental expense was : ( in millions ) 2008 2007 2006 minimum rental ( a ) $ 245 $ 209 $ 172 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>minimum rental ( a )</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 209</td><td>$ 172</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contingent rental</td><td>22</td><td>33</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>sublease rentals</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net rental expense</td><td>$ 267</td><td>$ 242</td><td>$ 193</td></tr></table> ( a ) excludes $ 5 million , $ 8 million and $ 9 million paid by united states steel in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 on assumed leases . 27 . contingencies and commitments we are the subject of , or party to , a number of pending or threatened legal actions , contingencies and commitments involving a variety of matters , including laws and regulations relating to the environment . certain of these matters are discussed below . the ultimate resolution of these contingencies could , individually or in the aggregate , be material to our consolidated financial statements . however , management believes that we will remain a viable and competitive enterprise even though it is possible that these contingencies could be resolved unfavorably . environmental matters 2013 we are subject to federal , state , local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the environment . these laws generally provide for control of pollutants released into the environment and require responsible parties to undertake remediation of hazardous waste disposal sites . penalties may be imposed for noncompliance . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , accrued liabilities for remediation totaled $ 111 million and $ 108 million . it is not presently possible to estimate the ultimate amount of all remediation costs that might be incurred or the penalties that may be imposed . receivables for recoverable costs from certain states , under programs to assist companies in clean-up efforts related to underground storage tanks at retail marketing outlets , were $ 60 and $ 66 million at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 . we are a defendant , along with other refining companies , in 20 cases arising in three states alleging damages for methyl tertiary-butyl ether ( 201cmtbe 201d ) contamination . we have also received seven toxic substances control act notice letters involving potential claims in two states . such notice letters are often followed by litigation . like the cases that were settled in 2008 , the remaining mtbe cases are consolidated in a multidistrict litigation in the southern district of new york for pretrial proceedings . nineteen of the remaining cases allege damages to water supply wells , similar to the damages claimed in the settled cases . in the other remaining case , the state of new jersey is seeking natural resources damages allegedly resulting from contamination of groundwater by mtbe . this is the only mtbe contamination case in which we are a defendant and natural resources damages are sought . we are vigorously defending these cases . we , along with a number of other defendants , have engaged in settlement discussions related to the majority of the cases in which we are a defendant . we do not expect our share of liability , if any , for the remaining cases to significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows . a lawsuit filed in the united states district court for the southern district of west virginia alleges that our catlettsburg , kentucky , refinery distributed contaminated gasoline to wholesalers and retailers for a period prior to august , 2003 , causing permanent damage to storage tanks , dispensers and related equipment , resulting in lost profits , business disruption and personal and real property damages . following the incident , we conducted remediation operations at affected facilities , and we deny that any permanent damages resulted from the incident . class action certification was granted in august 2007 . we have entered into a tentative settlement agreement in this case . notice of the proposed settlement has been sent to the class members . approval by the court after a fairness hearing is required before the settlement can be finalized . the fairness hearing is scheduled in the first quarter of 2009 . the proposed settlement will not significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows . guarantees 2013 we have provided certain guarantees , direct and indirect , of the indebtedness of other companies . under the terms of most of these guarantee arrangements , we would be required to perform should the guaranteed party fail to fulfill its obligations under the specified arrangements . in addition to these financial guarantees , we also have various performance guarantees related to specific agreements. .\nQuestion: what was the minimal rental value in 2008?\nAnswer: 245.0\nQuestion: what was the minimal rental value in 2006?\nAnswer: 172.0\nQuestion: what was the change in value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "73.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2055	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents ( e ) other adjustments primarily include certain historical retention costs , unusual , non-recurring litigation matters , secondary-offering-related expenses and expenses related to the consolidation of office locations north of chicago . during the year ended december 31 , 2013 , we recorded ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses of $ 75.0 million . for additional information on the ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses , see note 10 ( stockholder 2019s equity ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . ( f ) includes the impact of consolidating five months for the year ended december 31 , 2015 of kelway 2019s financial results . ( 4 ) non-gaap net income excludes , among other things , charges related to the amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets , non-cash equity-based compensation , acquisition and integration expenses , and gains and losses from the extinguishment of long-term debt . non-gaap net income is considered a non-gaap financial measure . generally , a non-gaap financial measure is a numerical measure of a company 2019s performance , financial position or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally included or excluded in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with gaap . non-gaap measures used by us may differ from similar measures used by other companies , even when similar terms are used to identify such measures . we believe that non-gaap net income provides meaningful information regarding our operating performance and cash flows including our ability to meet our future debt service , capital expenditures and working capital requirements . the following unaudited table sets forth a reconciliation of net income to non-gaap net income for the periods presented: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 403.1</td><td>$ 244.9</td><td>$ 132.8</td><td>$ 119.0</td><td>$ 17.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortization of intangibles ( a )</td><td>173.9</td><td>161.2</td><td>161.2</td><td>163.7</td><td>165.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation</td><td>31.2</td><td>16.4</td><td>8.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>19.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>non-cash equity-based compensation related to equity investment ( b )</td><td>20.0</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net loss on extinguishments of long-term debt</td><td>24.3</td><td>90.7</td><td>64.0</td><td>17.2</td><td>118.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>acquisition and integration expenses ( c )</td><td>10.2</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d )</td><td>-98.1 ( 98.1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other adjustments ( e )</td><td>3.7</td><td>-0.3 ( 0.3 )</td><td>61.2</td><td>-3.3 ( 3.3 )</td><td>-15.6 ( 15.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>aggregate adjustment for income taxes ( f )</td><td>-64.8 ( 64.8 )</td><td>-103.0 ( 103.0 )</td><td>-113.5 ( 113.5 )</td><td>-71.6 ( 71.6 )</td><td>-106.8 ( 106.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>non-gaap net income ( g )</td><td>$ 503.5</td><td>$ 409.9</td><td>$ 314.3</td><td>$ 247.1</td><td>$ 198.8</td></tr></table> acquisition and integration expenses ( c ) 10.2 2014 2014 2014 2014 gain on remeasurement of equity investment ( d ) ( 98.1 ) 2014 2014 2014 2014 other adjustments ( e ) 3.7 ( 0.3 ) 61.2 ( 3.3 ) ( 15.6 ) aggregate adjustment for income taxes ( f ) ( 64.8 ) ( 103.0 ) ( 113.5 ) ( 71.6 ) ( 106.8 ) non-gaap net income ( g ) $ 503.5 $ 409.9 $ 314.3 $ 247.1 $ 198.8 ( a ) includes amortization expense for acquisition-related intangible assets , primarily customer relationships , customer contracts and trade names . ( b ) represents our 35% ( 35 % ) share of an expense related to certain equity awards granted by one of the sellers to kelway coworkers in july 2015 prior to our acquisition of kelway . ( c ) primarily includes expenses related to the acquisition of kelway . ( d ) represents the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway . ( e ) primarily includes expenses related to the consolidation of office locations north of chicago and secondary- offering-related expenses . amount in 2013 primarily relates to ipo- and secondary-offering related expenses . ( f ) based on a normalized effective tax rate of 38.0% ( 38.0 % ) ( 39.0% ( 39.0 % ) prior to the kelway acquisition ) , except for the non- cash equity-based compensation from our equity investment and the gain resulting from the remeasurement of our previously held 35% ( 35 % ) equity investment to fair value upon the completion of the acquisition of kelway , which were tax effected at a rate of 35.4% ( 35.4 % ) . the aggregate adjustment for income taxes also includes a $ 4.0 million deferred tax benefit recorded during the three months and year ended december 31 , 2015 as a result of a tax rate reduction in the united kingdom and additional tax expense during the year ended december 31 , 2015 of $ 3.3 million as a result of recording withholding tax on the unremitted earnings of our canadian subsidiary . additionally , note that certain acquisition costs are non-deductible. .\nQuestion: what was net income in 2015?\nAnswer: 403.1\nQuestion: what was the value of stock compensation?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "31.2" } ]
CONVFINQA5976	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmfc 2019s operating profit for 2013 increased $ 175 million , or 14% ( 14 % ) , compared to 2012 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 85 million for air and missile defense programs ( thaad and pac-3 ) due to increased risk retirements and volume ; about $ 85 million for fire control programs ( sniper ae , lantirn ae and apache ) due to increased risk retirements and higher volume ; and approximately $ 75 million for tactical missile programs ( hellfire and various programs ) due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of about $ 45 million for the resolution of contractual matters in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 15 million for various technical services programs due to lower volume partially offset by increased risk retirements . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 100 million higher for 2013 compared to 2012 . 2012 compared to 2011 mfc 2019s net sales for 2012 were comparable to 2011 . net sales decreased approximately $ 130 million due to lower volume and risk retirements on various services programs , and about $ 60 million due to lower volume from fire control systems programs ( primarily sniper ae ; lantirn ae ; and apache ) . the decreases largely were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 95 million due to higher volume from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) and approximately $ 80 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) . mfc 2019s operating profit for 2012 increased $ 187 million , or 17% ( 17 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher risk retirements and volume of about $ 95 million from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) ; increased risk retirements and volume of approximately $ 60 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about $ 45 million from a resolution of contractual matters . partially offsetting these increases was lower risk retirements and volume on various programs , including $ 25 million for services programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 145 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011 . backlog backlog increased in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to higher orders on the thaad program and lower sales volume compared to new orders on certain fire control systems programs in 2013 , partially offset by lower orders on technical services programs and certain tactical missile programs . backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders and lower sales on fire control systems programs ( primarily lantirn ae and sniper ae ) and on various services programs , partially offset by lower orders and higher sales volume on tactical missiles programs . trends we expect mfc 2019s net sales to be flat to slightly down in 2014 compared to 2013 , primarily due to a decrease in net sales on technical services programs partially offset by an increase in net sales from missiles and fire control programs . operating profit is expected to decrease in the high single digit percentage range , driven by a reduction in expected risk retirements in 2014 . accordingly , operating profit margin is expected to slightly decline from 2013 . mission systems and training our mst business segment provides ship and submarine mission and combat systems ; mission systems and sensors for rotary and fixed-wing aircraft ; sea and land-based missile defense systems ; radar systems ; littoral combat ships ; simulation and training services ; and unmanned systems and technologies . mst 2019s major programs include aegis combat system ( aegis ) , lcs , mh-60 , tpq-53 radar system , and mk-41 vertical launching system ( vls ) . mst 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7153</td><td>$ 7579</td><td>$ 7132</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>905</td><td>737</td><td>645</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>12.7% ( 12.7 % )</td><td>9.7% ( 9.7 % )</td><td>9.0% ( 9.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>10800</td><td>10700</td><td>10500</td></tr></table> 2013 compared to 2012 mst 2019s net sales for 2013 decreased $ 426 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 275 million for various ship and aviation systems programs due to lower volume .\nQuestion: what was the operating profit in 2013?\nAnswer: 905.0\nQuestion: what was it in 2012?\nAnswer: 737.0\nQuestion: what is the sum?\nAnswer: 1642.0\nQuestion: what is the sum including operating profit from 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2287.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9739	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to five year summary ( a ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 2013 unallocated corporate ( expense ) income , net 201d in management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) ) which , on a combined basis , increased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 214 million , $ 139 million after tax ( $ 0.31 per share ) . also includes a reduction in income tax expense of $ 62 million ( $ 0.14 per share ) resulting from a tax benefit related to claims we filed for additional extraterritorial income exclusion ( eti ) tax benefits . these items increased earnings by $ 201 million after tax ( $ 0.45 per share ) . ( b ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 2013 unallocated corporate ( expense ) income , net 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , increased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 173 million , $ 113 million after tax ( $ 0.25 per share ) . ( c ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 2013 unallocated corporate ( expense ) income , net 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 215 million , $ 154 million after tax ( $ 0.34 per share ) . also includes a reduction in income tax expense resulting from the closure of an internal revenue service examination of $ 144 million ( $ 0.32 per share ) . these items reduced earnings by $ 10 million after tax ( $ 0.02 per share ) . ( d ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 153 million , $ 102 million after tax ( $ 0.22 per share ) . ( e ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 1112 million , $ 632 million after tax ( $ 1.40 per share ) . ( f ) we define return on invested capital ( roic ) as net earnings plus after-tax interest expense divided by average invested capital ( stockholders 2019 equity plus debt ) , after adjusting stockholders 2019 equity by adding back adjustments related to postretirement benefit plans . we believe that reporting roic provides investors with greater visibility into how effectively we use the capital invested in our operations . we use roic to evaluate multi-year investment decisions and as a long-term performance measure , and also use it as a factor in evaluating management performance under certain of our incentive compensation plans . roic is not a measure of financial performance under gaap , and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner . roic should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to net earnings as an indicator of performance . we calculate roic as follows : ( in millions ) 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings</td><td>$ 2529</td><td>$ 1825</td><td>$ 1266</td><td>$ 1053</td><td>$ 500</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense ( multiplied by 65% ( 65 % ) ) 1</td><td>235</td><td>241</td><td>276</td><td>317</td><td>378</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>return</td><td>$ 2764</td><td>$ 2066</td><td>$ 1542</td><td>$ 1370</td><td>$ 878</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average debt2 5</td><td>$ 4727</td><td>$ 5077</td><td>$ 5932</td><td>$ 6612</td><td>$ 7491</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>average equity3 5</td><td>7686</td><td>7590</td><td>7015</td><td>6170</td><td>6853</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>average benefit plan adjustments3 45</td><td>2006</td><td>1545</td><td>1296</td><td>1504</td><td>341</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>average invested capital</td><td>$ 14419</td><td>$ 14212</td><td>$ 14243</td><td>$ 14286</td><td>$ 14685</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>return on invested capital</td><td>19.2% ( 19.2 % )</td><td>14.5% ( 14.5 % )</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>9.6% ( 9.6 % )</td><td>6.0% ( 6.0 % )</td></tr></table> 1 represents after-tax interest expense utilizing the federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) . 2 debt consists of long-term debt , including current maturities , and short-term borrowings ( if any ) . 3 equity includes non-cash adjustments , primarily for the additional minimum pension liability in all years and the adoption of fas 158 in 2006 . 4 average benefit plan adjustments reflect the cumulative value of entries identified in our statement of stockholders equity under the captions 201cadjustment for adoption of fas 158 201d and 201cminimum pension liability . 201d the annual benefit plan adjustments to equity were : 2006 = ( $ 1883 ) million ; 2005 = ( $ 105 ) million ; 2004 = ( $ 285 ) million ; 2003 = $ 331 million ; and 2002 = ( $ 1537 ) million . as these entries are recorded in the fourth quarter , the value added back to our average equity in a given year is the cumulative impact of all prior year entries plus 20% ( 20 % ) of the current year entry value . 5 yearly averages are calculated using balances at the start of the year and at the end of each quarter. .\nQuestion: what was the total of net earnings in 2006?\nAnswer: 2529.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2005?\nAnswer: 1825.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change in net earnings over the year?\nAnswer: 704.0\nQuestion: and how much does that change represent in relation to the 2015 total of net earnings, in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.38575" } ]
CONVFINQA5033	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nanalog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) depreciation expense for property , plant and equipment was $ 134.5 million , $ 130.1 million and $ 114.1 million in fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company reviews property , plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable . recoverability of these assets is determined by comparison of their carrying amount to the future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate over their remaining economic lives . if such assets are considered to be impaired , the impairment to be recognized in earnings equals the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds their fair value determined by either a quoted market price , if any , or a value determined by utilizing a discounted cash flow technique . if such assets are not impaired , but their useful lives have decreased , the remaining net book value is depreciated over the revised useful life . we have not recorded any material impairment charges related to our property , plant and equipment in fiscal 2016 , fiscal 2015 or fiscal 2014 . f . goodwill and intangible assets goodwill the company evaluates goodwill for impairment annually , as well as whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable . the company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level ( operating segment or one level below an operating segment ) on an annual basis on the first day of the fourth quarter ( on or about august 1 ) or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist . for the company 2019s latest annual impairment assessment that occurred as of july 31 , 2016 , the company identified its reporting units to be its seven operating segments . the performance of the test involves a two-step process . the first step of the quantitative impairment test involves comparing the fair values of the applicable reporting units with their aggregate carrying values , including goodwill . the company determines the fair value of its reporting units using a weighting of the income and market approaches . under the income approach , the company uses a discounted cash flow methodology which requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions related to forecasted revenues , gross profit margins , operating income margins , working capital cash flow , perpetual growth rates , and long-term discount rates , among others . for the market approach , the company uses the guideline public company method . under this method the company utilizes information from comparable publicly traded companies with similar operating and investment characteristics as the reporting units , to create valuation multiples that are applied to the operating performance of the reporting unit being tested , in order to obtain their respective fair values . in order to assess the reasonableness of the calculated reporting unit fair values , the company reconciles the aggregate fair values of its reporting units determined , as described above , to its current market capitalization , allowing for a reasonable control premium . if the carrying amount of a reporting unit , calculated using the above approaches , exceeds the reporting unit 2019s fair value , the company performs the second step of the goodwill impairment test to determine the amount of impairment loss . the second step of the goodwill impairment test involves comparing the implied fair value of the affected reporting unit 2019s goodwill with the carrying value of that reporting unit . there was no impairment of goodwill in any of the fiscal years presented . the company 2019s next annual impairment assessment will be performed as of the first day of the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ending october 28 , 2017 ( fiscal 2017 ) unless indicators arise that would require the company to reevaluate at an earlier date . the following table presents the changes in goodwill during fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 1636526</td><td>$ 1642438</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>acquisition of hittite ( note 6 ) ( 1 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-1105 ( 1105 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>goodwill adjustment related to other acquisitions ( 2 )</td><td>44046</td><td>3663</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>-1456 ( 1456 )</td><td>-8470 ( 8470 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 1679116</td><td>$ 1636526</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amount in fiscal 2015 represents changes to goodwill as a result of finalizing the acquisition accounting related to the hittite acquisition . ( 2 ) represents goodwill related to other acquisitions that were not material to the company on either an individual or aggregate basis . intangible assets the company reviews finite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of assets may not be recoverable . recoverability of these assets is determined by comparison of their carrying value to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate over their remaining .\nQuestion: what was the balance of goodwill at the end of 2016?\nAnswer: 1679116.0\nQuestion: and at the end of 2015?\nAnswer: 1636526.0\nQuestion: what is the difference in balance between these two years?\nAnswer: 42590.0\nQuestion: and the percentage change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.02602" } ]
CONVFINQA1436	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\non may 20 , 2015 , aon plc issued $ 600 million of 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) senior notes due may 2045 . the 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) notes due may 2045 are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by aon corporation . we used the proceeds of the issuance for general corporate purposes . on september 30 , 2015 , $ 600 million of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) senior notes issued by aon corporation matured and were repaid . on november 13 , 2015 , aon plc issued $ 400 million of 2.80% ( 2.80 % ) senior notes due march 2021 . the 2.80% ( 2.80 % ) notes due march 2021 are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by aon corporation . we used the proceeds of the issuance for general corporate purposes . credit facilities as of december 31 , 2015 , we had two committed credit facilities outstanding : our $ 400 million u.s . credit facility expiring in march 2017 ( the \"2017 facility\" ) and $ 900 million multi-currency u.s . credit facility expiring in february 2020 ( the \"2020 facility\" ) . the 2020 facility was entered into on february 2 , 2015 and replaced the previous 20ac650 million european credit facility . each of these facilities is intended to support our commercial paper obligations and our general working capital needs . in addition , each of these facilities includes customary representations , warranties and covenants , including financial covenants that require us to maintain specified ratios of adjusted consolidated ebitda to consolidated interest expense and consolidated debt to adjusted consolidated ebitda , tested quarterly . at december 31 , 2015 , we did not have borrowings under either the 2017 facility or the 2020 facility , and we were in compliance with the financial covenants and all other covenants contained therein during the twelve months ended december 31 , 2015 . effective february 2 , 2016 , the 2020 facility terms were extended for 1 year and will expire in february 2021 our total debt-to-ebitda ratio at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , is calculated as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>1422</td><td>1431</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense</td><td>273</td><td>255</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income taxes</td><td>267</td><td>334</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>depreciation of fixed assets</td><td>229</td><td>242</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>amortization of intangible assets</td><td>314</td><td>352</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total ebitda</td><td>2505</td><td>2614</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total debt</td><td>5737</td><td>5582</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total debt-to-ebitda ratio</td><td>2.3</td><td>2.1</td></tr></table> we use ebitda , as defined by our financial covenants , as a non-gaap measure . this supplemental information related to ebitda represents a measure not in accordance with u.s . gaap and should be viewed in addition to , not instead of , our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto . shelf registration statement on september 3 , 2015 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the sec , registering the offer and sale from time to time of an indeterminate amount of , among other securities , debt securities , preference shares , class a ordinary shares and convertible securities . our ability to access the market as a source of liquidity is dependent on investor demand , market conditions and other factors. .\nQuestion: what is the total ebitda in 2015?\nAnswer: 2505.0\nQuestion: what is the interest expense in 2015?\nAnswer: 273.0\nQuestion: what time-interest-earned ratio does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "9.17582" } ]
CONVFINQA149	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\noff-balance sheet transactions contractual obligations as of december 31 , 2017 , our contractual obligations with initial or remaining terms in excess of one year , including interest payments on long-term debt obligations , were as follows ( in thousands ) : the table above does not include $ 0.5 million of unrecognized tax benefits ( we refer you to the notes to the consolidated financial statements note 201410 201cincome tax 201d ) . certain service providers may require collateral in the normal course of our business . the amount of collateral may change based on certain terms and conditions . as a routine part of our business , depending on market conditions , exchange rates , pricing and our strategy for growth , we regularly consider opportunities to enter into contracts for the building of additional ships . we may also consider the sale of ships , potential acquisitions and strategic alliances . if any of these transactions were to occur , they may be financed through the incurrence of additional permitted indebtedness , through cash flows from operations , or through the issuance of debt , equity or equity-related securities . funding sources certain of our debt agreements contain covenants that , among other things , require us to maintain a minimum level of liquidity , as well as limit our net funded debt-to-capital ratio , maintain certain other ratios and restrict our ability to pay dividends . substantially all of our ships and other property and equipment are pledged as collateral for certain of our debt . we believe we were in compliance with these covenants as of december 31 , 2017 . the impact of changes in world economies and especially the global credit markets can create a challenging environment and may reduce future consumer demand for cruises and adversely affect our counterparty credit risks . in the event this environment deteriorates , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted . we believe our cash on hand , expected future operating cash inflows , additional available borrowings under our new revolving loan facility and our ability to issue debt securities or additional equity securities , will be sufficient to fund operations , debt payment requirements , capital expenditures and maintain compliance with covenants under our debt agreements over the next twelve-month period . there is no assurance that cash flows from operations and additional financings will be available in the future to fund our future obligations . less than 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years more than 5 years long-term debt ( 1 ) $ 6424582 $ 619373 $ 1248463 $ 3002931 $ 1553815 operating leases ( 2 ) 131791 15204 28973 26504 61110 ship construction contracts ( 3 ) 6138219 1016892 1363215 1141212 2616900 port facilities ( 4 ) 138308 30509 43388 23316 41095 interest ( 5 ) 947967 218150 376566 203099 150152 other ( 6 ) 168678 54800 73653 23870 16355 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total</td><td>less than1 year</td><td>1-3 years</td><td>3-5 years</td><td>more than5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt ( 1 )</td><td>$ 6424582</td><td>$ 619373</td><td>$ 1248463</td><td>$ 3002931</td><td>$ 1553815</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating leases ( 2 )</td><td>131791</td><td>15204</td><td>28973</td><td>26504</td><td>61110</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>ship construction contracts ( 3 )</td><td>6138219</td><td>1016892</td><td>1363215</td><td>1141212</td><td>2616900</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>port facilities ( 4 )</td><td>138308</td><td>30509</td><td>43388</td><td>23316</td><td>41095</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>interest ( 5 )</td><td>947967</td><td>218150</td><td>376566</td><td>203099</td><td>150152</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other ( 6 )</td><td>168678</td><td>54800</td><td>73653</td><td>23870</td><td>16355</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 13949545</td><td>$ 1954928</td><td>$ 3134258</td><td>$ 4420932</td><td>$ 4439427</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes discount and premiums aggregating $ 0.5 million . also includes capital leases . the amount excludes deferred financing fees which are included in the consolidated balance sheets as an offset to long-term debt . ( 2 ) primarily for offices , motor vehicles and office equipment . ( 3 ) for our newbuild ships based on the euro/u.s . dollar exchange rate as of december 31 , 2017 . export credit financing is in place from syndicates of banks . ( 4 ) primarily for our usage of certain port facilities . ( 5 ) includes fixed and variable rates with libor held constant as of december 31 , 2017 . ( 6 ) future commitments for service , maintenance and other business enhancement capital expenditure contracts. .\nQuestion: what is the balance of total long-term debt ?\nAnswer: 6424582.0\nQuestion: what amount of long-term debt is due in 12 months?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "619373.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3398	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmutual and pooled funds shares of mutual funds are valued at the net asset value ( nav ) quoted on the exchange where the fund is traded and are classified as level 1 assets . units of pooled funds are valued at the per unit nav determined by the fund manager and are classified as level 2 assets . the investments are utilizing nav as a practical expedient for fair value . corporate and government bonds corporate and government bonds are classified as level 2 assets , as they are either valued at quoted market prices from observable pricing sources at the reporting date or valued based upon comparable securities with similar yields and credit ratings . mortgage and asset-backed securities mortgage and asset 2013backed securities are classified as level 2 assets , as they are either valued at quoted market prices from observable pricing sources at the reporting date or valued based upon comparable securities with similar yields , credit ratings , and purpose of the underlying loan . real estate pooled funds real estate pooled funds are classified as level 3 assets , as they are carried at the estimated fair value of the underlying properties . estimated fair value is calculated utilizing a combination of key inputs , such as revenue and expense growth rates , terminal capitalization rates , and discount rates . these key inputs are consistent with practices prevailing within the real estate investment management industry . other pooled funds other pooled funds classified as level 2 assets are valued at the nav of the shares held at year end , which is based on the fair value of the underlying investments . securities and interests classified as level 3 are carried at the estimated fair value of the underlying investments . the underlying investments are valued based on bids from brokers or other third-party vendor sources that utilize expected cash flow streams and other uncorroborated data , including counterparty credit quality , default risk , discount rates , and the overall capital market liquidity . insurance contracts insurance contracts are classified as level 3 assets , as they are carried at contract value , which approximates the estimated fair value . the estimated fair value is based on the fair value of the underlying investment of the insurance company . contributions and projected benefit payments pension contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans for fiscal year 2015 were $ 137.5 . contributions resulted primarily from an assessment of long-term funding requirements of the plans and tax planning . benefit payments to unfunded plans were due primarily to the timing of retirements and cost reduction actions . we anticipate contributing $ 100 to $ 120 to the defined benefit pension plans in 2016 . these contributions are driven primarily by benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are dependent upon timing of retirements and actions to reorganize the business . projected benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.s .</td><td>international</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 129.0</td><td>$ 52.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2017</td><td>135.8</td><td>53.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2018</td><td>142.2</td><td>55.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2019</td><td>149.6</td><td>57.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2020</td><td>157.4</td><td>57.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2021 20132025</td><td>917.9</td><td>332.3</td></tr></table> these estimated benefit payments are based on assumptions about future events . actual benefit payments may vary significantly from these estimates. .\nQuestion: what were the projected benefit payments for the us in the years of 2021 to 2025?\nAnswer: 917.9\nQuestion: what was, then, the annual average of those benefit payments?\nAnswer: 183.58\nQuestion: and what was the annual average of the projected benefit payments for international in that same period?\nAnswer: 66.46\nQuestion: what is, then, the difference between the us annual average and the international annual average, in that period?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "117.12" } ]
CONVFINQA7975	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 192.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>42.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>25.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rider revenue</td><td>8.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-41.2 ( 41.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>3.3</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 231.0</td></tr></table> the fuel recovery variance is due to the inclusion of grand gulf costs in fuel recoveries effective july 1 , 2006 . in june 2006 , the city council approved the recovery of grand gulf costs through the fuel adjustment clause , without a corresponding change in base rates ( a significant portion of grand gulf costs was previously recovered through base rates ) . the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 . the first quarter 2006 was affected by customer losses following hurricane katrina . entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers have returned and are taking service as of december 31 , 2007 , compared to approximately 95000 electric customers and 65000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2006 . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 540 gwh compared to the same period in 2006 , an increase of 14% ( 14 % ) . the rider revenue variance is due primarily to a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 . the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account . the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the net wholesale revenue variance is due to more energy available for resale in 2006 due to the decrease in retail usage caused by customer losses following hurricane katrina . in addition , 2006 revenue includes the sales into the wholesale market of entergy new orleans' share of the output of grand gulf , pursuant to city council approval of measures proposed by entergy new orleans to address the reduction in entergy new orleans' retail customer usage caused by hurricane katrina and to provide revenue support for the costs of entergy new orleans' share of grand other income statement variances 2008 compared to 2007 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a provision for storm-related bad debts of $ 11 million recorded in 2007 ; a decrease of $ 6.2 million in legal and professional fees ; a decrease of $ 3.4 million in employee benefit expenses ; and a decrease of $ 1.9 million in gas operations spending due to higher labor and material costs for reliability work in 2007. .\nQuestion: what was the 2007 net revenue?\nAnswer: 231.0\nQuestion: and for 2006?\nAnswer: 192.2\nQuestion: so what was the difference for this value between the two years?\nAnswer: 38.8\nQuestion: and was the proportion of fuel recovery to this change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.09794" } ]
CONVFINQA8740	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increased recovery of deferred fuel and purchased power costs primarily due to an increase in april 2004 in the energy cost recovery rider and the true-ups to the 2003 and 2002 energy cost recovery rider filings . other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the over-recovery of grand gulf costs due to an increase in the grand gulf rider effective january 2004 . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy arkansas' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2002 net revenue</td><td>$ 1095.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>march 2002 settlement agreement</td><td>-154.0 ( 154.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-7.7 ( 7.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>asset retirement obligation</td><td>30.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>16.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>deferred fuel cost revisions</td><td>10.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>7.6</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 998.7</td></tr></table> the march 2002 settlement agreement resolved a request for recovery of ice storm costs incurred in december 2000 with an offset of those costs for funds contributed to pay for future stranded costs . a 1997 settlement provided for the collection of earnings in excess of an 11% ( 11 % ) return on equity in a transition cost account ( tca ) to offset stranded costs if retail open access were implemented . in mid- and late december 2000 , two separate ice storms left 226000 and 212500 entergy arkansas customers , respectively , without electric power in its service area . entergy arkansas filed a proposal to recover costs plus carrying charges associated with power restoration caused by the ice storms . entergy arkansas' final storm damage cost determination reflected costs of approximately $ 195 million . the apsc approved a settlement agreement submitted in march 2002 by entergy arkansas , the apsc staff , and the arkansas attorney general . in the march 2002 settlement , the parties agreed that $ 153 million of the ice storm costs would be classified as incremental ice storm expenses that can be offset against the tca on a rate class basis , and any excess of ice storm costs over the amount available in the tca would be deferred and amortized over 30 years , although such excess costs were not allowed to be included as a separate component of rate base . the allocated ice storm expenses exceeded the available tca funds by $ 15.8 million which was recorded as a regulatory asset in june 2002 . in accordance with the settlement agreement and following the apsc's approval of the 2001 earnings review related to the tca , entergy arkansas filed to return $ 18.1 million of the tca to certain large general service class customers that paid more into the tca than their allocation of storm costs . the apsc approved the return of funds to the large general service customer class in the form of refund checks in august 2002 . as part of the implementation of the march 2002 settlement agreement provisions , the tca procedure ceased with the 2001 earnings evaluation . of the remaining ice storm costs , $ 32.2 million was addressed through established ratemaking procedures , including $ 22.2 million classified as capital additions , while $ 3.8 million of the ice storm costs was not recovered through rates . the effect on net income of the march 2002 settlement agreement and 2001 earnings review was a $ 2.2 million increase in 2003 , because the decrease in net revenue was offset by the decrease in operation and maintenance expenses discussed below. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in net revenue between 2002 and 2003?\nAnswer: 97.2\nQuestion: and the value for 2003 specifically?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "998.7" } ]
CONVFINQA7268	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) \| 72 snap-on incorporated following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits : ( amounts in millions ) amount . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions )</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 2006</td><td>$ 21.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases 2013 tax positions in prior periods</td><td>0.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross decreases 2013 tax positions in prior periods</td><td>-0.4 ( 0.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross increases 2013 tax positions in the current period</td><td>0.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-3.0 ( 3.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapsing of statutes of limitations</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>unrecognized tax benefits as of december 29 2007</td><td>$ 18.7</td></tr></table> of the $ 18.7 million of unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2007 , approximately $ 16.2 million would impact the effective income tax rate if recognized . interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in income tax expense . during the years ended december 29 , 2007 , december 30 , 2006 , and december 31 , 2005 , the company recognized approximately $ 1.2 million , $ 0.5 million and ( $ 0.5 ) million in net interest expense ( benefit ) , respectively . the company has provided for approximately $ 3.4 million , $ 2.2 million , and $ 1.7 million of accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits at the end of fiscal year 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . during the next 12 months , the company does not anticipate any significant changes to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits , other than the accrual of additional interest expense in an amount similar to the prior year 2019s expense . with few exceptions , snap-on is no longer subject to u.s . federal and state/local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2003 , and snap-on is no longer subject to non-u.s . income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2001 . the undistributed earnings of all non-u.s . subsidiaries totaled $ 338.5 million , $ 247.4 million and $ 173.6 million at the end of fiscal 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . snap-on has not provided any deferred taxes on these undistributed earnings as it considers the undistributed earnings to be permanently invested . determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred income tax liability related to these earnings is not practicable . the american jobs creation act of 2004 ( the 201cajca 201d ) created a one-time tax incentive for u.s . corporations to repatriate accumulated foreign earnings by providing a tax deduction of 85% ( 85 % ) of qualifying dividends received from foreign affiliates . under the provisions of the ajca , snap-on repatriated approximately $ 93 million of qualifying dividends in 2005 that resulted in additional income tax expense of $ 3.3 million for the year . note 9 : short-term and long-term debt notes payable and long-term debt as of december 29 , 2007 , was $ 517.9 million ; no commercial paper was outstanding at december 29 , 2007 . as of december 30 , 2006 , notes payable and long-term debt was $ 549.2 million , including $ 314.9 million of commercial paper . snap-on presented $ 300 million of the december 30 , 2006 , outstanding commercial paper as 201clong-term debt 201d on the accompanying december 30 , 2006 , consolidated balance sheet . on january 12 , 2007 , snap-on sold $ 300 million of unsecured notes consisting of $ 150 million of floating rate notes that mature on january 12 , 2010 , and $ 150 million of fixed rate notes that mature on january 15 , 2017 . interest on the floating rate notes accrues at a rate equal to the three-month london interbank offer rate plus 0.13% ( 0.13 % ) per year and is payable quarterly . interest on the fixed rate notes accrues at a rate of 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) per year and is payable semi-annually . snap-on used the proceeds from the sale of the notes , net of $ 1.5 million of transaction costs , to repay commercial paper obligations issued to finance the acquisition of business solutions . on january 12 , 2007 , the company also terminated a $ 250 million bridge credit agreement that snap-on established prior to its acquisition of business solutions. .\nQuestion: what was the undistributed earnings of all non-u.s. subsidiaries totaled in 2007?\nAnswer: 338.5\nQuestion: and for 2006?\nAnswer: 247.4\nQuestion: and the combined value for these two years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "585.9" } ]
CONVFINQA6597	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntransfer agent and registrar for common stock the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is : computershare shareowner services llc 480 washington boulevard 29th floor jersey city , new jersey 07310 telephone : ( 877 ) 363-6398 sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2014 to december 31 , 2014 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that mayyet be purchased under theplans or programs3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>5854930</td><td>$ 18.93</td><td>5849517</td><td>$ 159819370</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>4266</td><td>$ 20.29</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 159819370</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>826744</td><td>$ 19.67</td><td>826639</td><td>$ 143559758</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>6685940</td><td>$ 19.02</td><td>6676156</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 5413 withheld shares in october 2014 , 4266 withheld shares in november 2014 and 105 withheld shares in december 2014 . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 in february 2014 , the board authorized a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2014 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 13 , 2015 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining available for repurchase under the 2014 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .\nQuestion: what was the total number of shares purchased in october?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "5854930.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1665	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nkey operating and financial activities significant operating and financial activities during 2012 include : 2022 net proved reserve additions for the e&p and osm segments combined of 389 mmboe , for a 226 percent reserve replacement 2022 increased proved liquid hydrocarbon and synthetic crude oil reserves by 316 mmbbls , for a reserve replacement of 268 percent for these commodities 2022 recorded more than 95 percent average operational availability for operated e&p assets 2022 increased e&p net sales volumes , excluding libya , by 8 percent 2022 eagle ford shale average net sales volumes of 65 mboed for december 2012 , a fourfold increase over december 2011 2022 bakken shale average net sales volumes of 29 mboed , a 71 percent increase over last year 2022 resumed sales from libya and reached pre-conflict production levels 2022 international liquid hydrocarbon sales volumes , for which average realizations have exceeded wti , were 62 percent of net e&p liquid hydrocarbon sales 2022 closed $ 1 billion of acquisitions in the core of the eagle ford shale 2022 assumed operatorship of the vilje field located offshore norway 2022 signed agreements for new exploration positions in e.g. , gabon , kenya and ethiopia 2022 issued $ 1 billion of 3-year senior notes at 0.9 percent interest and $ 1 billion of 10-year senior notes at 2.8 percent interest some significant 2013 activities through february 22 , 2013 include : 2022 closed sale of our alaska assets in january 2013 2022 closed sale of our interest in the neptune gas plant in february 2013 consolidated results of operations : 2012 compared to 2011 consolidated income before income taxes was 38 percent higher in 2012 than consolidated income from continuing operations before income taxes were in 2011 , largely due to higher liquid hydrocarbon sales volumes in our e&p segment , partially offset by lower earnings from our osm and ig segments . the 7 percent decrease in income from continuing operations included lower earnings in the u.k . and e.g. , partially offset by higher earnings in libya . also , in 2011 we were not in an excess foreign tax credit position for the entire year as we were in 2012 . the effective income tax rate for continuing operations was 74 percent in 2012 compared to 61 percent in 2011 . revenues are summarized in the following table: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>e&p</td><td>$ 14084</td><td>$ 13029</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>osm</td><td>1552</td><td>1588</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>ig</td><td>2014</td><td>93</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>segment revenues</td><td>15636</td><td>14710</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>elimination of intersegment revenues</td><td>2014</td><td>-47 ( 47 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>unrealized gain on crude oil derivative instruments</td><td>52</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total revenues</td><td>$ 15688</td><td>$ 14663</td></tr></table> e&p segment revenues increased $ 1055 million from 2011 to 2012 , primarily due to higher average liquid hydrocarbon sales volumes . e&p segment revenues included a net realized gain on crude oil derivative instruments of $ 15 million in 2012 while the impact of derivatives was not significant in 2011 . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 2013 note 16 to the consolidated financial statement for more information about our crude oil derivative instruments . included in our e&p segment are supply optimization activities which include the purchase of commodities from third parties for resale . see the cost of revenues discussion as revenues from supply optimization approximate the related costs . supply optimization serves to aggregate volumes in order to satisfy transportation commitments and to achieve flexibility within product .\nQuestion: what is the total revenue in 2012?\nAnswer: 15688.0\nQuestion: what about in 2011?\nAnswer: 14663.0\nQuestion: what is the net increase in total revenue?\nAnswer: 1025.0\nQuestion: what growth rate does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.0699" } ]
CONVFINQA4208	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents valero energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) commodity price risk we are exposed to market risks related to the volatility in the price of crude oil , refined products ( primarily gasoline and distillate ) , grain ( primarily corn ) , and natural gas used in our operations . to reduce the impact of price volatility on our results of operations and cash flows , we use commodity derivative instruments , including futures , swaps , and options . we use the futures markets for the available liquidity , which provides greater flexibility in transacting our hedging and trading operations . we use swaps primarily to manage our price exposure . our positions in commodity derivative instruments are monitored and managed on a daily basis by a risk control group to ensure compliance with our stated risk management policy that has been approved by our board of directors . for risk management purposes , we use fair value hedges , cash flow hedges , and economic hedges . in addition to the use of derivative instruments to manage commodity price risk , we also enter into certain commodity derivative instruments for trading purposes . our objective for entering into each type of hedge or trading derivative is described below . fair value hedges fair value hedges are used to hedge price volatility in certain refining inventories and firm commitments to purchase inventories . the level of activity for our fair value hedges is based on the level of our operating inventories , and generally represents the amount by which our inventories differ from our previous year-end lifo inventory levels . as of december 31 , 2012 , we had the following outstanding commodity derivative instruments that were entered into to hedge crude oil and refined product inventories and commodity derivative instruments related to the physical purchase of crude oil and refined products at a fixed price . the information presents the notional volume of outstanding contracts by type of instrument and year of maturity ( volumes in thousands of barrels ) . notional contract volumes by year of maturity derivative instrument 2013 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>derivative instrument</td><td>notionalcontractvolumes byyear ofmaturity 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>crude oil and refined products:</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>futures 2013 long</td><td>1052</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>futures 2013 short</td><td>4857</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>physical contracts - long</td><td>3805</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the volume of futures 2013 short?\nAnswer: 4857.0\nQuestion: what is that times 2?\nAnswer: 9714.0\nQuestion: what is the volume of physical contracts - long?\nAnswer: 3805.0\nQuestion: what is the doubled volume of shorts less the volume of physical contracts - long?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "5909.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8237	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndividends for a summary of the cash dividends paid on citi 2019s outstanding common stock during 2009 and 2010 , see note 33 to the consolidated financial statements . for so long as the u.s . government holds any citigroup trust preferred securities acquired pursuant to the exchange offers consummated in 2009 , citigroup has agreed not to pay a quarterly common stock dividend exceeding $ 0.01 per quarter , subject to certain customary exceptions . further , any dividend on citi 2019s outstanding common stock would need to be made in compliance with citi 2019s obligations to any remaining outstanding citigroup preferred stock . performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citigroup 2019s common stock with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period extending through december 31 , 2010 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in citigroup 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index and that all dividends were reinvested . citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31,</td><td>citigroup</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>s&p financial index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006</td><td>119.55</td><td>115.79</td><td>119.19</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2007</td><td>66.10</td><td>122.15</td><td>96.98</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2008</td><td>15.88</td><td>76.96</td><td>43.34</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2009</td><td>7.85</td><td>97.33</td><td>50.80</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2010</td><td>11.22</td><td>111.99</td><td>56.96</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the change in value of the cititgroup's common stock from the year of 2005 to 2010?\nAnswer: -88.78\nQuestion: and what was the original value invested in that stock in 2005?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "100.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3116	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nlevels during 2008 , an indication that efforts to improve network operations translated into better customer service . 2022 fuel prices 2013 crude oil prices increased at a steady rate through the first seven months of 2008 , closing at a record high of $ 145.29 a barrel in early july . as the economy worsened during the third and fourth quarters , fuel prices dropped dramatically , hitting $ 33.87 per barrel in december , a near five-year low . despite these price declines toward the end of the year , our 2008 average fuel price increased by 39% ( 39 % ) and added $ 1.1 billion of operating expenses compared to 2007 . our fuel surcharge programs helped offset the impact of higher fuel prices . in addition , we reduced our consumption rate by 4% ( 4 % ) , saving approximately 58 million gallons of fuel during the year . the use of newer , more fuel efficient locomotives ; our fuel conservation programs ; improved network operations ; and a shift in commodity mix , primarily due to growth in bulk shipments , contributed to the improvement . 2022 free cash flow 2013 cash generated by operating activities totaled a record $ 4.1 billion , yielding free cash flow of $ 825 million in 2008 . free cash flow is defined as cash provided by operating activities , less cash used in investing activities and dividends paid . free cash flow is not considered a financial measure under accounting principles generally accepted in the united states ( gaap ) by sec regulation g and item 10 of sec regulation s-k . we believe free cash flow is important in evaluating our financial performance and measures our ability to generate cash without additional external financings . free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities . the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 4070</td><td>$ 3277</td><td>$ 2880</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2764 ( 2764 )</td><td>-2426 ( 2426 )</td><td>-2042 ( 2042 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dividends paid</td><td>-481 ( 481 )</td><td>-364 ( 364 )</td><td>-322 ( 322 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 825</td><td>$ 487</td><td>$ 516</td></tr></table> 2009 outlook 2022 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits our employees , our customers , our shareholders , and the public . we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , and training and engaging our employees . we plan to continue implementation of total safety culture ( tsc ) throughout our operations . tsc , an employee-focused initiative that has helped improve safety , is a process designed to establish , maintain , and promote safety among co-workers . with respect to public safety , we will continue our efforts to maintain , upgrade , and close crossings , install video cameras on locomotives , and educate the public about crossing safety through various railroad and industry programs , along with other activities . 2022 transportation plan 2013 in 2009 , we will continue to evaluate traffic flows and network logistic patterns to identify additional opportunities to simplify operations and improve network efficiency and asset utilization . we plan to maintain adequate manpower and locomotives , and improve productivity using industrial engineering techniques . 2022 fuel prices 2013 on average , we expect fuel prices to decrease substantially from the average price we paid in 2008 . however , due to economic uncertainty , other global pressures , and weather incidents , fuel prices again could be volatile during the year . to reduce the impact of fuel price on earnings , we .\nQuestion: what was free cash flow in 2007?\nAnswer: 487.0\nQuestion: what was it in 2006?\nAnswer: 516.0\nQuestion: what is the net change in value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-29.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3674	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nduring 2010 , we granted 3.8 million rsus and 1.1 million employee sars . see footnote no . 4 , 201cshare-based compensation , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for additional information . new accounting standards see footnote no . 1 , 201csummary of significant accounting policies , 201d of the notes to our financial statements for information related to our adoption of new accounting standards in 2010 and for information on our anticipated adoption of recently issued accounting standards . liquidity and capital resources cash requirements and our credit facilities our credit facility , which expires on may 14 , 2012 , and associated letters of credit , provide for $ 2.4 billion of aggregate effective borrowings . borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus a fixed spread based on the credit ratings for our public debt . we also pay quarterly fees on the credit facility at a rate based on our public debt rating . for additional information on our credit facility , including participating financial institutions , see exhibit 10 , 201camended and restated credit agreement , 201d to our current report on form 8-k filed with the sec on may 16 , 2007 . although our credit facility does not expire until 2012 , we expect that we may extend or replace it during 2011 . the credit facility contains certain covenants , including a single financial covenant that limits our maximum leverage ( consisting of adjusted total debt to consolidated ebitda , each as defined in the credit facility ) to not more than 4 to 1 . our outstanding public debt does not contain a corresponding financial covenant or a requirement that we maintain certain financial ratios . we currently satisfy the covenants in our credit facility and public debt instruments , including the leverage covenant under the credit facility , and do not expect the covenants to restrict our ability to meet our anticipated borrowing and guarantee levels or increase those levels should we need to do so in the future . we believe the credit facility , together with cash we expect to generate from operations and our ability to raise capital , remains adequate to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements , finance our long-term growth plans , meet debt service , and fulfill other cash requirements . at year-end 2010 , our available borrowing capacity amounted to $ 2.831 billion and reflected borrowing capacity of $ 2.326 billion under our credit facility and our cash balance of $ 505 million . we calculate that borrowing capacity by taking $ 2.404 billion of effective aggregate bank commitments under our credit facility and subtracting $ 78 million of outstanding letters of credit under our credit facility . during 2010 , we repaid our outstanding credit facility borrowings and had no outstanding balance at year-end . as noted in the previous paragraphs , we anticipate that this available capacity will be adequate to fund our liquidity needs . since we continue to have ample flexibility under the credit facility 2019s covenants , we also expect that undrawn bank commitments under the credit facility will remain available to us even if business conditions were to deteriorate markedly . cash from operations cash from operations , depreciation expense , and amortization expense for the last three fiscal years are as follows : ( $ in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash from operations</td><td>$ 1151</td><td>$ 868</td><td>$ 641</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>depreciation expense</td><td>138</td><td>151</td><td>155</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>amortization expense</td><td>40</td><td>34</td><td>35</td></tr></table> our ratio of current assets to current liabilities was roughly 1.4 to 1.0 at year-end 2010 and 1.2 to 1.0 at year-end 2009 . we minimize working capital through cash management , strict credit-granting policies , and aggressive collection efforts . we also have significant borrowing capacity under our credit facility should we need additional working capital. .\nQuestion: what was cash from operations in 2009?\nAnswer: 868.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2008?\nAnswer: 641.0\nQuestion: what is the net change in value?\nAnswer: 227.0\nQuestion: what was the 2008 value?\nAnswer: 641.0\nQuestion: what is the net change over the 2008 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.35413" } ]
CONVFINQA4652	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to the consolidated financial statements on march 18 , 2008 , ppg completed a public offering of $ 600 million in aggregate principal amount of its 5.75% ( 5.75 % ) notes due 2013 ( the 201c2013 notes 201d ) , $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of its 6.65% ( 6.65 % ) notes due 2018 ( the 201c2018 notes 201d ) and $ 250 million in aggregate principal amount of its 7.70% ( 7.70 % ) notes due 2038 ( the 201c2038 notes 201d and , together with the 2013 notes and the 2018 notes , the 201cnotes 201d ) . the notes were offered by the company pursuant to its existing shelf registration . the proceeds of this offering of $ 1538 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) and additional borrowings of $ 195 million under the 20ac650 million revolving credit facility were used to repay existing debt , including certain short-term debt and the amounts outstanding under the 20ac1 billion bridge loan . no further amounts can be borrowed under the 20ac1 billion bridge loan . the discount and issuance costs related to the notes , which totaled $ 12 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective lives of the notes . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>20ac1 billion bridge loan agreement 5.2% ( 5.2 % )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 1047</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . commercial paper 5.3% ( 5.3 % ) as of dec . 31 2008</td><td>222</td><td>617</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>20ac650 million revolving credit facility weighted average 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) as of dec . 31 2008 ( 1 )</td><td>200</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other weighted average 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) as of dec . 31 2008</td><td>362</td><td>154</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 784</td><td>$ 1818</td></tr></table> total $ 784 $ 1818 ( 1 ) borrowings under this facility have a term of 30 days and can be rolled over monthly until the facility expires in 2010 . ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2008 , total indebtedness was 45% ( 45 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross- default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 totaled $ 228 million , $ 102 million and $ 90 million , respectively . rental expense for operating leases was $ 267 million , $ 188 million and $ 161 million in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . the primary leased assets include paint stores , transportation equipment , warehouses and other distribution facilities , and office space , including the company 2019s corporate headquarters located in pittsburgh , pa . minimum lease commitments for operating leases that have initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2008 , are ( in millions ) $ 126 in 2009 , $ 107 in 2010 , $ 82 in 2011 , $ 65 in 2012 , $ 51 in 2013 and $ 202 thereafter . the company had outstanding letters of credit of $ 82 million as of december 31 , 2008 . the letters of credit secure the company 2019s performance to third parties under certain self-insurance programs and other commitments made in the ordinary course of business . as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 guarantees outstanding were $ 70 million . the guarantees relate primarily to debt of certain entities in which ppg has an ownership interest and selected customers of certain of the company 2019s businesses . a portion of such debt is secured by the assets of the related entities . the carrying values of these guarantees were $ 9 million and $ 3 million as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , and the fair values were $ 40 million and $ 17 million , as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the company does not believe any loss related to these letters of credit or guarantees is likely . 10 . financial instruments , excluding derivative financial instruments included in ppg 2019s financial instrument portfolio are cash and cash equivalents , cash held in escrow , marketable equity securities , company-owned life insurance and short- and long-term debt instruments . the fair values of the financial instruments approximated their carrying values , in the aggregate , except for long-term long-term debt ( excluding capital lease obligations ) , had carrying and fair values totaling $ 3122 million and $ 3035 million , respectively , as of december 31 , 2008 . the corresponding amounts as of december 31 , 2007 , were $ 1201 million and $ 1226 million , respectively . the fair values of the debt instruments were based on discounted cash flows and interest rates currently available to the company for instruments of the same remaining maturities . 2008 ppg annual report and form 10-k 45 .\nQuestion: what is the net change in interest payments from 2006 to 2007?\nAnswer: 12.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2006?\nAnswer: 90.0\nQuestion: what is the net change divided by the 2006 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.13333" } ]
CONVFINQA1096	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfair value of financial instruments the carrying amounts shown for the company 2019s cash and cash equivalents , accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short term maturity of those instruments . the fair value of the long term debt approximates its carrying value based on the variable nature of interest rates and current market rates available to the company . the fair value of foreign currency forward contracts is based on the net difference between the u.s . dollars to be received or paid at the contracts 2019 settlement date and the u.s . dollar value of the foreign currency to be sold or purchased at the current forward exchange rate . recently issued accounting standards in june 2011 , the financial accounting standards board ( 201cfasb 201d ) issued an accounting standards update which eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in stockholders 2019 equity . it requires an entity to present total comprehensive income , which includes the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income , either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements . in december 2011 , the fasb issued an amendment to this pronouncement which defers the specific requirement to present components of reclassifications of other comprehensive income on the face of the income statement . these pronouncements are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years , and interim periods within those years , beginning after december 15 , 2011 . the company believes the adoption of these pronouncements will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements . in may 2011 , the fasb issued an accounting standards update which clarifies requirements for how to measure fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements common to accounting principles generally accepted in the united states of america and international financial reporting standards . this guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after december 15 , 2011 . the company believes the adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements . 3 . inventories inventories consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>december 31 , 2011</td><td>december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>finished goods</td><td>$ 323606</td><td>$ 214524</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>raw materials</td><td>803</td><td>831</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total inventories</td><td>$ 324409</td><td>$ 215355</td></tr></table> 4 . acquisitions in july 2011 , the company acquired approximately 400.0 thousand square feet of office space comprising its corporate headquarters for $ 60.5 million . the acquisition included land , buildings , tenant improvements and third party lease-related intangible assets . as of the purchase date , 163.6 thousand square feet of the 400.0 thousand square feet acquired was leased to third party tenants . these leases had remaining lease terms ranging from 9 months to 15 years on the purchase date . the company intends to occupy additional space as it becomes available . since the acquisition , the company has invested $ 2.2 million in additional improvements . the acquisition included the assumption of a $ 38.6 million loan secured by the property and the remaining purchase price was paid in cash funded primarily by a $ 25.0 million term loan borrowed in may 2011 . the carrying value of the assumed loan approximated its fair value on the date of the acquisition . refer to note 7 for .\nQuestion: what was the difference between the inventory of finished goods of 2011 and 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "109082.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9025	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmission systems and training our mst business segment provides ship and submarine mission and combat systems ; mission systems and sensors for rotary and fixed-wing aircraft ; sea and land-based missile defense systems ; radar systems ; littoral combat ships ; simulation and training services ; and unmanned systems and technologies . mst 2019s major programs include aegis combat system ( aegis ) , littoral combat ship ( lcs ) , mh-60 , tpq-53 radar system and mk-41 vertical launching system . mst 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7147</td><td>$ 7153</td><td>$ 7579</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>843</td><td>905</td><td>737</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>11.8% ( 11.8 % )</td><td>12.7% ( 12.7 % )</td><td>9.7% ( 9.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 11700</td><td>$ 10800</td><td>$ 10700</td></tr></table> 2014 compared to 2013 mst 2019s net sales for 2014 were comparable to 2013 . net sales decreased by approximately $ 85 million for undersea systems programs due to decreased volume and deliveries ; and about $ 55 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 . the decreases were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 80 million for integrated warfare systems and sensors programs due to increased volume ( primarily space fence ) ; and approximately $ 40 million for training and logistics solutions programs due to increased deliveries ( primarily close combat tactical trainer ) . mst 2019s operating profit for 2014 decreased $ 62 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 120 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ; and approximately $ 45 million due to higher reserves recorded on certain training and logistics solutions programs . the decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 45 million for performance matters and reserves recorded in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ; and about $ 60 million for various programs due to increased risk retirements ( including mh-60 and radar surveillance programs ) . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 50 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013 . 2013 compared to 2012 mst 2019s net sales for 2013 decreased $ 426 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 275 million for various ship and aviation systems programs due to lower volume ( primarily ptds as final surveillance system deliveries occurred during the second quarter of 2012 ) ; about $ 195 million for various integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily naval systems ) due to lower volume ; approximately $ 65 million for various training and logistics programs due to lower volume ; and about $ 55 million for the aegis program due to lower volume . the decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 155 million for the lcs program due to increased volume . mst 2019s operating profit for 2013 increased $ 168 million , or 23% ( 23 % ) , compared to 2012 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 120 million related to the settlement of contract cost matters on certain programs ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) ; about $ 55 million for integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily radar and halifax class modernization programs ) due to increased risk retirements ; and approximately $ 30 million for undersea systems programs due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of about $ 55 million for training and logistics programs , primarily due to the recording of approximately $ 30 million of charges mostly related to lower-of-cost-or-market considerations ; and about $ 25 million for ship and aviation systems programs ( primarily ptds ) due to lower risk retirements and volume . operating profit related to the lcs program was comparable . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 170 million higher for 2013 compared to 2012 . backlog backlog increased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to higher orders on new program starts ( such as space fence ) . backlog increased slightly in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to higher orders and lower sales on integrated warfare system and sensors programs ( primarily aegis ) and lower sales on various service programs , partially offset by lower orders on ship and aviation systems ( primarily mh-60 ) . .\nQuestion: what was the change in net sales for mst from 2012 to 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-426.0" } ]
CONVFINQA629	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues the table below presents net revenues by line item. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>year ended december 2018</td><td>year ended december 2017</td><td>year ended december 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>investment banking</td><td>$ 7862</td><td>$ 7371</td><td>$ 6273</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investment management</td><td>6514</td><td>5803</td><td>5407</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commissions and fees</td><td>3199</td><td>3051</td><td>3208</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>market making</td><td>9451</td><td>7660</td><td>9933</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other principal transactions</td><td>5823</td><td>5913</td><td>3382</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>totalnon-interestrevenues</td><td>32849</td><td>29798</td><td>28203</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>interest income</td><td>19679</td><td>13113</td><td>9691</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>interest expense</td><td>15912</td><td>10181</td><td>7104</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net interest income</td><td>3767</td><td>2932</td><td>2587</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total net revenues</td><td>$ 36616</td><td>$ 32730</td><td>$ 30790</td></tr></table> in the table above : 2030 investment banking consists of revenues ( excluding net interest ) from financial advisory and underwriting assignments , as well as derivative transactions directly related to these assignments . these activities are included in our investment banking segment . 2030 investment management consists of revenues ( excluding net interest ) from providing investment management services to a diverse set of clients , as well as wealth advisory services and certain transaction services to high-net-worth individuals and families . these activities are included in our investment management segment . 2030 commissions and fees consists of revenues from executing and clearing client transactions on major stock , options and futures exchanges worldwide , as well as over-the-counter ( otc ) transactions . these activities are included in our institutional client services and investment management segments . 2030 market making consists of revenues ( excluding net interest ) from client execution activities related to making markets in interest rate products , credit products , mortgages , currencies , commodities and equity products . these activities are included in our institutional client services segment . 2030 other principal transactions consists of revenues ( excluding net interest ) from our investing activities and the origination of loans to provide financing to clients . in addition , other principal transactions includes revenues related to our consolidated investments . these activities are included in our investing & lending segment . provision for credit losses , previously reported in other principal transactions revenues , is now reported as a separate line item in the consolidated statements of earnings . previously reported amounts have been conformed to the current presentation . operating environment . during 2018 , our market- making activities reflected generally higher levels of volatility and improved client activity , compared with a low volatility environment in 2017 . in investment banking , industry-wide mergers and acquisitions volumes increased compared with 2017 , while industry-wide underwriting transactions decreased . our other principal transactions revenues benefited from company-specific events , including sales , and strong corporate performance , while investments in public equities reflected losses , as global equity prices generally decreased in 2018 , particularly towards the end of the year . in investment management , our assets under supervision increased reflecting net inflows in liquidity products , fixed income assets and equity assets , partially offset by depreciation in client assets , primarily in equity assets . if market-making or investment banking activity levels decline , or assets under supervision decline , or asset prices continue to decline , net revenues would likely be negatively impacted . see 201csegment operating results 201d for further information about the operating environment and material trends and uncertainties that may impact our results of operations . during 2017 , generally higher asset prices and tighter credit spreads were supportive of industry-wide underwriting activities , investment management performance and other principal transactions . however , low levels of volatility in equity , fixed income , currency and commodity markets continued to negatively affect our market-making activities . 2018 versus 2017 net revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 36.62 billion for 2018 , 12% ( 12 % ) higher than 2017 , primarily due to significantly higher market making revenues and net interest income , as well as higher investment management revenues and investment banking revenues . non-interest revenues . investment banking revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 7.86 billion for 2018 , 7% ( 7 % ) higher than 2017 . revenues in financial advisory were higher , reflecting an increase in industry-wide completed mergers and acquisitions volumes . revenues in underwriting were slightly higher , due to significantly higher revenues in equity underwriting , driven by initial public offerings , partially offset by lower revenues in debt underwriting , reflecting a decline in leveraged finance activity . investment management revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 6.51 billion for 2018 , 12% ( 12 % ) higher than 2017 , primarily due to significantly higher incentive fees , as a result of harvesting . management and other fees were also higher , reflecting higher average assets under supervision and the impact of the recently adopted revenue recognition standard , partially offset by shifts in the mix of client assets and strategies . see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about asu no . 2014-09 , 201crevenue from contracts with customers ( topic 606 ) . 201d 52 goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k .\nQuestion: what was the total net revenues for 2018?\nAnswer: 36616.0\nQuestion: and for 2017?\nAnswer: 32730.0\nQuestion: so what was the difference in this value between the two years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3886.0" } ]
CONVFINQA164	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n31mar201122064257 positions which were required to be capitalized . there are no positions which we anticipate could change materially within the next twelve months . liquidity and capital resources . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>fiscal years ended october 1 2010</td><td>fiscal years ended october 2 2009</td><td>fiscal years ended october 3 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period</td><td>$ 364221</td><td>$ 225104</td><td>$ 241577</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>222962</td><td>218805</td><td>182673</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-95329 ( 95329 )</td><td>-49528 ( 49528 )</td><td>-94959 ( 94959 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net cash used in financing activities</td><td>-38597 ( 38597 )</td><td>-30160 ( 30160 )</td><td>-104187 ( 104187 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>cash and cash equivalents at end of period ( 1 )</td><td>$ 453257</td><td>$ 364221</td><td>$ 225104</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) does not include restricted cash balances cash flow from operating activities : cash provided from operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in certain assets and liabilities . for fiscal year 2010 we generated $ 223.0 million in cash flow from operations , an increase of $ 4.2 million when compared to the $ 218.8 million generated in fiscal year 2009 . during fiscal year 2010 , net income increased by $ 42.3 million to $ 137.3 million when compared to fiscal year 2009 . despite the increase in net income , net cash provided by operating activities remained relatively consistent . this was primarily due to : 2022 fiscal year 2010 net income included a deferred tax expense of $ 38.5 million compared to a $ 24.9 million deferred tax benefit included in 2009 net income due to the release of the tax valuation allowance in fiscal year 2009 . 2022 during fiscal year 2010 , the company invested in working capital as result of higher business activity . compared to fiscal year 2009 , accounts receivable , inventory and accounts payable increased by $ 60.9 million , $ 38.8 million and $ 42.9 million , respectively . cash flow from investing activities : cash flow from investing activities consists primarily of capital expenditures and acquisitions . we had net cash outflows of $ 95.3 million in fiscal year 2010 , compared to $ 49.5 million in fiscal year 2009 . the increase is primarily due to an increase of $ 49.8 million in capital expenditures . we anticipate our capital spending to be consistent in fiscal year 2011 to maintain our projected growth rate . cash flow from financing activities : cash flows from financing activities consist primarily of cash transactions related to debt and equity . during fiscal year 2010 , we had net cash outflows of $ 38.6 million , compared to $ 30.2 million in fiscal year 2009 . during the year we had the following significant transactions : 2022 we retired $ 53.0 million in aggregate principal amount ( carrying value of $ 51.1 million ) of 2007 convertible notes for $ 80.7 million , which included a $ 29.6 million premium paid for the equity component of the instrument . 2022 we received net proceeds from employee stock option exercises of $ 40.5 million in fiscal year 2010 , compared to $ 38.7 million in fiscal year 2009 . skyworks / 2010 annual report 103 .\nQuestion: what is the balance of cash and cash equivalents at the end of 2010?\nAnswer: 453257.0\nQuestion: what about end of 2009?\nAnswer: 364221.0\nQuestion: what is the change in the balance of cash and cash equivalents from 2010 to 2011?\nAnswer: 89036.0\nQuestion: what is the balance of cash and cash equivalents at the end of 2009?\nAnswer: 364221.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.24446" } ]
CONVFINQA160	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n31mar201122064257 positions which were required to be capitalized . there are no positions which we anticipate could change materially within the next twelve months . liquidity and capital resources . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>fiscal years ended october 1 2010</td><td>fiscal years ended october 2 2009</td><td>fiscal years ended october 3 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period</td><td>$ 364221</td><td>$ 225104</td><td>$ 241577</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>222962</td><td>218805</td><td>182673</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-95329 ( 95329 )</td><td>-49528 ( 49528 )</td><td>-94959 ( 94959 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net cash used in financing activities</td><td>-38597 ( 38597 )</td><td>-30160 ( 30160 )</td><td>-104187 ( 104187 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>cash and cash equivalents at end of period ( 1 )</td><td>$ 453257</td><td>$ 364221</td><td>$ 225104</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) does not include restricted cash balances cash flow from operating activities : cash provided from operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in certain assets and liabilities . for fiscal year 2010 we generated $ 223.0 million in cash flow from operations , an increase of $ 4.2 million when compared to the $ 218.8 million generated in fiscal year 2009 . during fiscal year 2010 , net income increased by $ 42.3 million to $ 137.3 million when compared to fiscal year 2009 . despite the increase in net income , net cash provided by operating activities remained relatively consistent . this was primarily due to : 2022 fiscal year 2010 net income included a deferred tax expense of $ 38.5 million compared to a $ 24.9 million deferred tax benefit included in 2009 net income due to the release of the tax valuation allowance in fiscal year 2009 . 2022 during fiscal year 2010 , the company invested in working capital as result of higher business activity . compared to fiscal year 2009 , accounts receivable , inventory and accounts payable increased by $ 60.9 million , $ 38.8 million and $ 42.9 million , respectively . cash flow from investing activities : cash flow from investing activities consists primarily of capital expenditures and acquisitions . we had net cash outflows of $ 95.3 million in fiscal year 2010 , compared to $ 49.5 million in fiscal year 2009 . the increase is primarily due to an increase of $ 49.8 million in capital expenditures . we anticipate our capital spending to be consistent in fiscal year 2011 to maintain our projected growth rate . cash flow from financing activities : cash flows from financing activities consist primarily of cash transactions related to debt and equity . during fiscal year 2010 , we had net cash outflows of $ 38.6 million , compared to $ 30.2 million in fiscal year 2009 . during the year we had the following significant transactions : 2022 we retired $ 53.0 million in aggregate principal amount ( carrying value of $ 51.1 million ) of 2007 convertible notes for $ 80.7 million , which included a $ 29.6 million premium paid for the equity component of the instrument . 2022 we received net proceeds from employee stock option exercises of $ 40.5 million in fiscal year 2010 , compared to $ 38.7 million in fiscal year 2009 . skyworks / 2010 annual report 103 .\nQuestion: what is the balance of cash and cash equivalents at the end of 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "453257.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10377	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n92 \| 2017 form 10-k finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives and tested for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired . in 2016 , gross customer relationship intangibles of $ 96 million and related accumulated amortization of $ 27 million as well as gross intellectual property intangibles of $ 111 million and related accumulated amortization of $ 48 million from the resource industries segment were impaired . the fair value of these intangibles was determined to be insignificant based on an income approach using expected cash flows . the fair value determination is categorized as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy due to its use of internal projections and unobservable measurement inputs . the total impairment of $ 132 million was a result of restructuring activities and is included in other operating ( income ) expense in statement 1 . see note 25 for information on restructuring costs . amortization expense related to intangible assets was $ 323 million , $ 326 million and $ 337 million for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2017 , amortization expense related to intangible assets is expected to be : ( millions of dollars ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 322</td><td>$ 316</td><td>$ 305</td><td>$ 287</td><td>$ 268</td><td>$ 613</td></tr></table> b . goodwill there were no goodwill impairments during 2017 or 2015 . our annual impairment tests completed in the fourth quarter of 2016 indicated the fair value of each reporting unit was substantially above its respective carrying value , including goodwill , with the exception of our surface mining & technology reporting unit . the surface mining & technology reporting unit , which primarily serves the mining industry , is a part of our resource industries segment . the goodwill assigned to this reporting unit is largely from our acquisition of bucyrus international , inc . in 2011 . its product portfolio includes large mining trucks , electric rope shovels , draglines , hydraulic shovels and related parts . in addition to equipment , surface mining & technology also develops and sells technology products and services to provide customer fleet management , equipment management analytics and autonomous machine capabilities . the annual impairment test completed in the fourth quarter of 2016 indicated that the fair value of surface mining & technology was below its carrying value requiring the second step of the goodwill impairment test process . the fair value of surface mining & technology was determined primarily using an income approach based on a discounted ten year cash flow . we assigned the fair value to surface mining & technology 2019s assets and liabilities using various valuation techniques that required assumptions about royalty rates , dealer attrition , technological obsolescence and discount rates . the resulting implied fair value of goodwill was below the carrying value . accordingly , we recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $ 595 million , which resulted in goodwill of $ 629 million remaining for surface mining & technology as of october 1 , 2016 . the fair value determination is categorized as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy due to its use of internal projections and unobservable measurement inputs . there was a $ 17 million tax benefit associated with this impairment charge. .\nQuestion: what was the expected amortization expense in 2019?\nAnswer: 316.0\nQuestion: what was it in 2018?\nAnswer: 322.0\nQuestion: what is the difference of 2019 less 2018?\nAnswer: -6.0\nQuestion: what is that difference over the 2018 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.01863" } ]
CONVFINQA868	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nreinvested for continued use in foreign operations . if the total undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries were remitted , a significant amount of the additional tax would be offset by the allowable foreign tax credits . it is not practical for us to determine the additional tax of remitting these earnings . in september 2007 , we reached a settlement with the united states department of justice to resolve an investigation into financial relationships between major orthopaedic manufacturers and consulting orthopaedic surgeons . under the terms of the settlement , we paid a civil settlement amount of $ 169.5 million and we recorded an expense in that amount . at the time , no tax benefit was recorded related to the settlement expense due to the uncertainty as to the tax treatment . during the third quarter of 2008 , we reached an agreement with the u.s . internal revenue service ( irs ) confirming the deductibility of a portion of the settlement payment . as a result , during 2008 we recorded a current tax benefit of $ 31.7 million . in june 2006 , the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) issued interpretation no . 48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes 2013 an interpretation of fasb statement no . 109 , accounting for income taxes ( fin 48 ) . fin 48 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements . under fin 48 , we may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities , based on the technical merits of the position . the tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement . fin 48 also provides guidance on derecognition , classification , interest and penalties on income taxes , accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures . we adopted fin 48 on january 1 , 2007 . prior to the adoption of fin 48 we had a long term tax liability for expected settlement of various federal , state and foreign income tax liabilities that was reflected net of the corollary tax impact of these expected settlements of $ 102.1 million , as well as a separate accrued interest liability of $ 1.7 million . as a result of the adoption of fin 48 , we are required to present the different components of such liability on a gross basis versus the historical net presentation . the adoption resulted in the financial statement liability for unrecognized tax benefits decreasing by $ 6.4 million as of january 1 , 2007 . the adoption resulted in this decrease in the liability as well as a reduction to retained earnings of $ 4.8 million , a reduction in goodwill of $ 61.4 million , the establishment of a tax receivable of $ 58.2 million , which was recorded in other current and non-current assets on our consolidated balance sheet , and an increase in an interest/penalty payable of $ 7.9 million , all as of january 1 , 2007 . therefore , after the adoption of fin 48 , the amount of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 95.7 million as of january 1 , 2007 . as of december 31 , 2008 , the amount of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 129.5 million . of this amount , $ 45.5 million would impact our effective tax rate if recognized . $ 38.2 million of the $ 129.5 million liability for unrecognized tax benefits relate to tax positions of acquired entities taken prior to their acquisition by us . under fas 141 ( r ) , if these liabilities are settled for different amounts , they will affect the income tax expense in the period of reversal or settlement . the following is a tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 135.2</td><td>$ 95.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases related to prior periods</td><td>12.1</td><td>27.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>decreases related to prior periods</td><td>-32.0 ( 32.0 )</td><td>-5.5 ( 5.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increases related to current period</td><td>15.8</td><td>21.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-1.3 ( 1.3 )</td><td>-1.3 ( 1.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>decreases related to lapse of statue of limitations</td><td>-0.3 ( 0.3 )</td><td>-3.0 ( 3.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 129.5</td><td>$ 135.2</td></tr></table> we recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of earnings , which is consistent with the recognition of these items in prior reporting periods . as of december 31 , 2007 , we recorded a liability of $ 19.6 million for accrued interest and penalties , of which $ 14.7 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized . the amount of this liability is $ 22.9 million as of december 31 , 2008 . of this amount , $ 17.1 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized . we expect that the amount of tax liability for unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next twelve months ; however , we do not expect these changes will have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial position . the u.s . federal statute of limitations remains open for the year 2003 and onward . the u.s . federal returns for years 2003 and 2004 are currently under examination by the irs . on july 15 , 2008 , the irs issued its examination report . we filed a formal protest on august 15 , 2008 and requested a conference with the appeals office regarding disputed issues . although the appeals process could take several years , we do not anticipate resolution of the audit will result in any significant impact on our results of operations , financial position or cash flows . in addition , for the 1999 tax year of centerpulse , which we acquired in october 2003 , one issue remains in dispute . state income tax returns are generally subject to examination for a period of 3 to 5 years after filing of the respective return . the state impact of any federal changes remains subject to examination by various states for a period of up to one year after formal notification to the states . we have various state income tax returns in the process of examination , administrative appeals or litigation . it is z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 8 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg* transmitting job : c48761 pcn : 057000000 *%%pcmsg\|57 \|00010\|yes\|no\|02/24/2009 06:10\|0\|0\|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d\| .\nQuestion: what is the balance of unrecognized tax benefits in 2008?\nAnswer: 129.5\nQuestion: what about in 2007?\nAnswer: 135.2\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: -5.7\nQuestion: what is the value of the increases related to prior periods in 2008?\nAnswer: 12.1\nQuestion: what about in 2007?\nAnswer: 27.4\nQuestion: what is the total increases related to prior periods for 2007 and 2008?\nAnswer: 39.5\nQuestion: what about the total increases related to current period for 2007 and 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "37.7" } ]
CONVFINQA2793	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nduring 2012 , the company granted selected employees an aggregate of 139 thousand rsus with internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds . these awards vested in january 2015 . the terms of the grants specified that to the extent certain performance goals , comprised of internal measures and , separately , market thresholds were achieved , the rsus would vest ; if performance goals were surpassed , up to 175% ( 175 % ) of the target awards would be distributed ; and if performance goals were not met , the awards would be forfeited . in january 2015 , an additional 93 thousand rsus were granted and distributed because performance thresholds were exceeded . in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus , both with and without performance conditions , to certain employees under the 2007 plan . the rsus without performance conditions vest ratably over the three- year service period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant and the rsus with performance conditions vest ratably over the three-year performance period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant ( the 201cperformance period 201d ) . distribution of the performance shares is contingent upon the achievement of internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds over the performance period . during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus to non-employee directors under the 2007 plan . the rsus vested on the date of grant ; however , distribution of the shares will be made within 30 days of the earlier of : ( i ) 15 months after grant date , subject to any deferral election by the director ; or ( ii ) the participant 2019s separation from service . because these rsus vested on the grant date , the total grant date fair value was recorded in operation and maintenance expense included in the expense table above on the grant date . rsus generally vest over periods ranging from one to three years . rsus granted with service-only conditions and those with internal performance measures are valued at the market value of the closing price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant . rsus granted with market conditions are valued using a monte carlo model . expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years . the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s . treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date . the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted-average grant date fair values of rsus granted for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected volatility</td><td>14.93% ( 14.93 % )</td><td>17.78% ( 17.78 % )</td><td>19.37% ( 19.37 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.07% ( 1.07 % )</td><td>0.75% ( 0.75 % )</td><td>0.40% ( 0.40 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td><td>3.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>grant date fair value per share</td><td>$ 62.10</td><td>$ 45.45</td><td>$ 40.13</td></tr></table> the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards that vest ratably and have market and/or performance and service conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method . rsus that have no performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and are included in operations expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 4 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.4 years . the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .\nQuestion: what was the grant date fair value per share in 2015?\nAnswer: 62.1\nQuestion: and what was it in 2013?\nAnswer: 40.13\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\nAnswer: 21.97\nQuestion: and what is this change as a percentage of the 2013 fair value?\nAnswer: 0.54747\nQuestion: and only during the last year of that period, what was the change in that fair value?\nAnswer: 16.65\nQuestion: and what percentage does this change represent in relation to the 2014 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.36634" } ]
CONVFINQA5670	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nlockheed martin corporation management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations december 31 , 2002 space systems space systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2002 2001 2000 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7384</td><td>$ 6836</td><td>$ 7339</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>443</td><td>360</td><td>345</td></tr></table> net sales for space systems increased by 8% ( 8 % ) in 2002 compared to 2001 . the increase in sales for 2002 resulted from higher volume in government space of $ 370 million and commercial space of $ 180 million . in government space , increases of $ 470 million in government satellite programs and $ 130 million in ground systems activities more than offset volume declines of $ 175 million on government launch vehi- cles and $ 55 million on strategic missile programs . the increase in commercial space sales is primarily attributable to an increase in launch vehicle activities , with nine commercial launches during 2002 compared to six in 2001 . net sales for the segment decreased by 7% ( 7 % ) in 2001 com- pared to 2000 . the decrease in sales for 2001 resulted from volume declines in commercial space of $ 560 million , which more than offset increases in government space of $ 60 million . in commercial space , sales declined due to volume reductions of $ 480 million in commercial launch vehicle activities and $ 80 million in satellite programs . there were six launches in 2001 compared to 14 launches in 2000 . the increase in gov- ernment space resulted from a combined increase of $ 230 mil- lion related to higher volume on government satellite programs and ground systems activities . these increases were partially offset by a $ 110 million decrease related to volume declines in government launch vehicle activity , primarily due to program maturities , and by $ 50 million due to the absence in 2001 of favorable adjustments recorded on the titan iv pro- gram in 2000 . operating profit for the segment increased 23% ( 23 % ) in 2002 as compared to 2001 , mainly driven by the commercial space business . reduced losses in commercial space during 2002 resulted in increased operating profit of $ 90 million when compared to 2001 . commercial satellite manufacturing losses declined $ 100 million in 2002 as operating performance improved and satellite deliveries increased . in the first quarter of 2001 , a $ 40 million loss provision was recorded on certain commercial satellite manufacturing contracts . due to the industry-wide oversupply and deterioration of pricing in the commercial launch market , financial results on commercial launch vehicles continue to be challenging . during 2002 , this trend led to a decline in operating profit of $ 10 million on commercial launch vehicles when compared to 2001 . this decrease was primarily due to lower profitability of $ 55 mil- lion on the three additional launches in the current year , addi- tional charges of $ 60 million ( net of a favorable contract adjustment of $ 20 million ) for market and pricing pressures and included the adverse effect of a $ 35 million adjustment for commercial launch vehicle contract settlement costs . the 2001 results also included charges for market and pricing pressures , which reduced that year 2019s operating profit by $ 145 million . the $ 10 million decrease in government space 2019s operating profit for the year is primarily due to the reduced volume on government launch vehicles and strategic missile programs , which combined to decrease operating profit by $ 80 million , partially offset by increases of $ 40 million in government satellite programs and $ 30 million in ground systems activities . operating profit for the segment increased by 4% ( 4 % ) in 2001 compared to 2000 . operating profit increased in 2001 due to a $ 35 million increase in government space partially offset by higher year-over-year losses of $ 20 million in commercial space . in government space , operating profit increased due to the impact of higher volume and improved performance in ground systems and government satellite programs . the year- to-year comparison of operating profit was not affected by the $ 50 million favorable titan iv adjustment recorded in 2000 discussed above , due to a $ 55 million charge related to a more conservative assessment of government launch vehi- cle programs that was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2000 . in commercial space , decreased operating profit of $ 15 mil- lion on launch vehicles more than offset lower losses on satel- lite manufacturing activities . the commercial launch vehicle operating results included $ 60 million in higher charges for market and pricing pressures when compared to 2000 . these negative adjustments were partially offset by $ 50 million of favorable contract adjustments on certain launch vehicle con- tracts . commercial satellite manufacturing losses decreased slightly from 2000 and included the adverse impact of a $ 40 million loss provision recorded in the first quarter of 2001 for certain commercial satellite contracts related to schedule and technical issues. .\nQuestion: what was the profit margin for lockheed martin in 2002?\nAnswer: 0.05999\nQuestion: what was the total operating profit in 2002 and 2001?\nAnswer: 803.0\nQuestion: and including the value for 2003?\nAnswer: 1148.0\nQuestion: so what was the average value during this time?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "382.66667" } ]
CONVFINQA7423	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncapitalized software : internally developed computer software costs and costs of product enhancements are capitalized subsequent to the determination of technological feasibility ; such capitalization continues until the product becomes available for commercial release . judgment is required in determining when technological feasibility of a product is established . the company has determined that technological feasibility is reached after all high-risk development issues have been resolved through coding and testing . generally , the time between the establishment of technological feasibility and commercial release of software is minimal , resulting in insignificant or no capitalization of internally developed software costs . amortization of capitalized software costs , both for internally developed as well as for purchased software products , is computed on a product-by-product basis over the estimated economic life of the product , which is generally three years . amortization is the greater of the amount computed using : ( i ) the ratio of the current year 2019s gross revenue to the total current and anticipated future gross revenue for that product or ( ii ) the straight-line method over the estimated life of the product . amortization expense related to capitalized and acquired software costs , including the related trademarks , was $ 40.9 million , $ 33.7 million and $ 32.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the company periodically reviews the carrying value of capitalized software . impairments are recognized in the results of operations when the expected future undiscounted operating cash flow derived from the capitalized costs of internally developed software is less than the carrying value . no impairment charges have been required to date . goodwill and other intangible assets : goodwill represents the excess of the consideration transferred over the fair value of net identifiable assets acquired . intangible assets consist of trademarks , customer lists , contract backlog , and acquired software and technology . the company tests goodwill for impairment at least annually by performing a qualitative assessment of whether there is sufficient evidence that it is more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount . the application of a qualitative assessment requires the company to assess and make judgments regarding a variety of factors which potentially impact the fair value of a reporting unit , including general economic conditions , industry and market-specific conditions , customer behavior , cost factors , the company 2019s financial performance and trends , the company 2019s strategies and business plans , capital requirements , management and personnel issues , and the company 2019s stock price , among others . the company then considers the totality of these and other factors , placing more weight on the events and circumstances that are judged to most affect a reporting unit 2019s fair value or the carrying amount of its net assets , to reach a qualitative conclusion regarding whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount . if it is determined that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value , no further analysis is necessary . if it is determined that it is more likely than not the reporting unit's carrying value exceeds its fair value , a quantitative two-step analysis is performed where the fair value of the reporting unit is estimated and the impairment loss , if any , is recorded . the company tests indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually by comparing the carrying value of the asset to its estimated fair value . the company performs its annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets impairment test on january 1 of each year unless there is an indicator that would require a test during the year . the company periodically reviews the carrying value of other intangible assets and will recognize impairments when events or circumstances indicate that such assets may be impaired . no impairment charges have been required to date for the company's goodwill and other intangible assets . concentrations of credit risk : the company has a concentration of credit risk with respect to revenue and trade receivables due to the use of certain significant channel partners to market and sell the company 2019s products . the company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers 2019 financial condition and generally does not require collateral . the following table outlines concentrations of risk with respect to the company 2019s revenue: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( as a % ( % ) of revenue except customer data )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue from channel partners</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>largest channel partner</td><td>6% ( 6 % )</td><td>4% ( 4 % )</td><td>4% ( 4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2ndlargest channel partner</td><td>3% ( 3 % )</td><td>3% ( 3 % )</td><td>3% ( 3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>direct sale customers exceeding 5% ( 5 % ) of revenue</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> table of contents .\nQuestion: what was amortization expense related to capitalized and acquired software costs, including the related trademarks in 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "40.9" } ]
CONVFINQA7291	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe aggregate changes in the balance of gross unrecognized tax benefits , which excludes interest and penalties , for 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 , is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 1375</td><td>$ 943</td><td>$ 971</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases related to tax positions taken during a prior year</td><td>340</td><td>49</td><td>61</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>decreases related to tax positions taken during a prior year</td><td>-107 ( 107 )</td><td>-39 ( 39 )</td><td>-224 ( 224 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increases related to tax positions taken during the current year</td><td>467</td><td>425</td><td>240</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>0</td><td>-102 ( 102 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>decreases related to expiration of statute of limitations</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 2062</td><td>$ 1375</td><td>$ 943</td></tr></table> the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes . as of september 29 , 2012 and september 24 , 2011 , the total amount of gross interest and penalties accrued was $ 401 million and $ 261 million , respectively , which is classified as non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets . in connection with tax matters , the company recognized interest expense in 2012 and 2011 of $ 140 million and $ 14 million , respectively , and in 2010 the company recognized an interest benefit of $ 43 million . the company is subject to taxation and files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and in many state and foreign jurisdictions . for u.s . federal income tax purposes , all years prior to 2004 are closed . the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . the company has contested certain of these adjustments through the irs appeals office . the irs is currently examining the years 2007 through 2009 . in addition , the company is also subject to audits by state , local and foreign tax authorities . in major states and major foreign jurisdictions , the years subsequent to 1989 and 2002 , respectively , generally remain open and could be subject to examination by the taxing authorities . management believes that an adequate provision has been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income tax in the period such resolution occurs . although timing of the resolution and/or closure of audits is not certain , the company believes it is reasonably possible that tax audit resolutions could reduce its unrecognized tax benefits by between $ 120 million and $ 170 million in the next 12 months . note 6 2013 shareholders 2019 equity and share-based compensation preferred stock the company has five million shares of authorized preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . under the terms of the company 2019s restated articles of incorporation , the board of directors is authorized to determine or alter the rights , preferences , privileges and restrictions of the company 2019s authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock . dividend and stock repurchase program in 2012 , the board of directors of the company approved a dividend policy pursuant to which it plans to make , subject to subsequent declaration , quarterly dividends of $ 2.65 per share . on july 24 , 2012 , the board of directors declared a dividend of $ 2.65 per share to shareholders of record as of the close of business on august 13 , 2012 . the company paid $ 2.5 billion in conjunction with this dividend on august 16 , 2012 . no dividends were declared in the first three quarters of 2012 or in 2011 and 2010. .\nQuestion: what was the total of gross unrecognized tax benefits in 2012, in millions?\nAnswer: 2062.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2011, also in millions?\nAnswer: 1375.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\nAnswer: 687.0\nQuestion: what was the total of gross unrecognized tax benefits in 2012, in millions?\nAnswer: 1375.0\nQuestion: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2012 total, in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.49964" } ]
CONVFINQA11054	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n2018 a0form 10-k18 item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations . this management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our discussion of cautionary statements and significant risks to the company 2019s business under item 1a . risk factors of the 2018 form a010-k . overview our sales and revenues for 2018 were $ 54.722 billion , a 20 a0percent increase from 2017 sales and revenues of $ 45.462 a0billion . the increase was primarily due to higher sales volume , mostly due to improved demand across all regions and across the three primary segments . profit per share for 2018 was $ 10.26 , compared to profit per share of $ 1.26 in 2017 . profit was $ 6.147 billion in 2018 , compared with $ 754 million in 2017 . the increase was primarily due to lower tax expense , higher sales volume , decreased restructuring costs and improved price realization . the increase was partially offset by higher manufacturing costs and selling , general and administrative ( sg&a ) and research and development ( r&d ) expenses and lower profit from the financial products segment . fourth-quarter 2018 sales and revenues were $ 14.342 billion , up $ 1.446 billion , or 11 percent , from $ 12.896 billion in the fourth quarter of 2017 . fourth-quarter 2018 profit was $ 1.78 per share , compared with a loss of $ 2.18 per share in the fourth quarter of 2017 . fourth-quarter 2018 profit was $ 1.048 billion , compared with a loss of $ 1.299 billion in 2017 . highlights for 2018 include : zz sales and revenues in 2018 were $ 54.722 billion , up 20 a0percent from 2017 . sales improved in all regions and across the three primary segments . zz operating profit as a percent of sales and revenues was 15.2 a0percent in 2018 , compared with 9.8 percent in 2017 . adjusted operating profit margin was 15.9 percent in 2018 , compared with 12.5 percent in 2017 . zz profit was $ 10.26 per share for 2018 , and excluding the items in the table below , adjusted profit per share was $ 11.22 . for 2017 profit was $ 1.26 per share , and excluding the items in the table below , adjusted profit per share was $ 6.88 . zz in order for our results to be more meaningful to our readers , we have separately quantified the impact of several significant items: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions of dollars )</td><td>full year 2018 profit before taxes</td><td>full year 2018 profitper share</td><td>full year 2018 profit before taxes</td><td>profitper share</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>profit</td><td>$ 7822</td><td>$ 10.26</td><td>$ 4082</td><td>$ 1.26</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>restructuring costs</td><td>386</td><td>0.50</td><td>1256</td><td>1.68</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>mark-to-market losses</td><td>495</td><td>0.64</td><td>301</td><td>0.26</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>deferred tax valuation allowance adjustments</td><td>2014</td><td>-0.01 ( 0.01 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-0.18 ( 0.18 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>u.s . tax reform impact</td><td>2014</td><td>-0.17 ( 0.17 )</td><td>2014</td><td>3.95</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>gain on sale of equity investment</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-85 ( 85 )</td><td>-0.09 ( 0.09 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>adjusted profit</td><td>$ 8703</td><td>$ 11.22</td><td>$ 5554</td><td>$ 6.88</td></tr></table> zz machinery , energy & transportation ( me&t ) operating cash flow for 2018 was about $ 6.3 billion , more than sufficient to cover capital expenditures and dividends . me&t operating cash flow for 2017 was about $ 5.5 billion . restructuring costs in recent years , we have incurred substantial restructuring costs to achieve a flexible and competitive cost structure . during 2018 , we incurred $ 386 million of restructuring costs related to restructuring actions across the company . during 2017 , we incurred $ 1.256 billion of restructuring costs with about half related to the closure of the facility in gosselies , belgium , and the remainder related to other restructuring actions across the company . although we expect restructuring to continue as part of ongoing business activities , restructuring costs should be lower in 2019 than 2018 . notes : zz glossary of terms included on pages 33-34 ; first occurrence of terms shown in bold italics . zz information on non-gaap financial measures is included on pages 42-43. .\nQuestion: what was the profit per share for 2018?\nAnswer: 10.26\nQuestion: and in 2017?\nAnswer: 1.26\nQuestion: so what was the proportion of 2018 profit to 2017?\nAnswer: 8.14286\nQuestion: and applying this same rate to determine the profit per share in 2019?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "83.54571" } ]
CONVFINQA9952	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction , and various states and foreign jurisdictions . with few exceptions , the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state and local , or non-u.s . income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 1999 . it is anticipated that its examination for the company 2019s u.s . income tax returns for the years 2002 through 2004 will be completed by the end of first quarter 2008 . as of december 31 , 2007 , the irs has proposed adjustments to the company 2019s tax positions for which the company is fully reserved . payments relating to any proposed assessments arising from the 2002 through 2004 audit may not be made until a final agreement is reached between the company and the irs on such assessments or upon a final resolution resulting from the administrative appeals process or judicial action . in addition to the u.s . federal examination , there is also limited audit activity in several u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . currently , the company expects the liability for unrecognized tax benefits to change by an insignificant amount during the next 12 months . the company adopted the provisions of fasb interpretation no . 48 , 201caccounting for uncertainty in income taxes , 201d on january 1 , 2007 . as a result of the implementation of interpretation 48 , the company recognized an immaterial increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits , which was accounted for as a reduction to the january 1 , 2007 , balance of retained earnings . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits ( 201cutb 201d ) is as follows : ( millions ) federal , state , and foreign tax . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>federal state and foreign tax</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross utb balance at january 1 2007</td><td>$ 691</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>143</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-189 ( 189 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-20 ( 20 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>gross utb balance at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 680</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net utb impacting the effective tax rate at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 334</td></tr></table> the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate as of january 1 , 2007 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are $ 261 million and $ 334 million . the ending net utb results from adjusting the gross balance at december 31 , 2007 for items such as federal , state , and non-u.s . deferred items , interest and penalties , and deductible taxes . the net utb is included as components of accrued income taxes and other liabilities within the consolidated balance sheet . the company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense . at january 1 , 2007 and december 31 , 2007 , accrued interest and penalties on a gross basis were $ 65 million and $ 69 million , respectively . included in these interest and penalty amounts is interest and penalties related to tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility . because of the impact of deferred tax accounting , other than interest and penalties , the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period . in 2007 , the company completed the preparation and filing of its 2006 u.s . federal and state income tax returns , which did not result in any material changes to the company 2019s financial position . in 2006 , an audit of the company 2019s u.s . tax returns for years through 2001 was completed . the company and the internal revenue service reached a final settlement for these years , including an agreement on the amount of a refund claim to be filed by the company . the company also substantially resolved audits in certain european countries . in addition , the company completed the preparation and filing of its 2005 u.s . federal income tax return and the corresponding 2005 state income tax returns . the adjustments from amounts previously estimated in the u.s . federal and state income tax returns ( both positive and negative ) included lower u.s . taxes on dividends received from the company's foreign subsidiaries . the company also made quarterly adjustments ( both positive and negative ) to its reserves for tax contingencies . considering the developments noted above and other factors , including the impact on open audit years of the recent resolution of issues in various audits , these reassessments resulted in a reduction of the reserves in 2006 by $ 149 million , inclusive of the expected amount of certain refund claims . in 2005 , the company announced its intent to reinvest $ 1.7 billion of foreign earnings in the united states pursuant to the provisions of the american jobs creation act of 2004 . this act provided the company the opportunity to tax- .\nQuestion: what was the ratio of the beginning gross utb to the end balance?\nAnswer: 2.06886\nQuestion: what were the total accrued interest and penalties included in the gross unrecognized tax benefits for 1/1/07 and 12/31/07?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "134.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1503	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nzimmer biomet holdings , inc . and subsidiaries 2017 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) substantially complete . the following table summarizes the liabilities related to these integration plans ( in millions ) : employee termination benefits contract terminations total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>employee termination benefits</td><td>contract terminations</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance december 31 2016</td><td>$ 38.1</td><td>$ 35.1</td><td>$ 73.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions</td><td>12.1</td><td>5.2</td><td>17.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash payments</td><td>-36.7 ( 36.7 )</td><td>-10.4 ( 10.4 )</td><td>-47.1 ( 47.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>foreign currency exchange rate changes</td><td>1.3</td><td>0.4</td><td>1.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance december 31 2017</td><td>$ 14.8</td><td>$ 30.3</td><td>$ 45.1</td></tr></table> we have also recognized other employee termination benefits related to ldr , other acquisitions and our operational excellence initiatives . dedicated project personnel expenses include the salary , benefits , travel expenses and other costs directly associated with employees who are 100 percent dedicated to our integration of acquired businesses , employees who have been notified of termination , but are continuing to work on transferring their responsibilities and employees working on our quality enhancement and remediation efforts and operational excellence initiatives . relocated facilities expenses are the moving costs , lease expenses and other facility costs incurred during the relocation period in connection with relocating certain facilities . certain litigation matters relate to net expenses recognized during the year for the estimated or actual settlement of certain pending litigation and similar claims , including matters where we recognized income from a settlement on more favorable terms than our previous estimate , or we reduced our estimate of a previously recorded contingent liability . these litigation matters have included royalty disputes , patent litigation matters , product liability litigation matters and commercial litigation matters . contract termination costs relate to terminated agreements in connection with the integration of acquired companies and changes to our distribution model as part of business restructuring and operational excellence initiatives . the terminated contracts primarily relate to sales agents and distribution agreements . information technology integration costs are non- capitalizable costs incurred related to integrating information technology platforms of acquired companies or other significant software implementations as part of our quality and operational excellence initiatives . as part of the biomet merger , we recognized $ 209.0 million of intangible assets for in-process research and development ( 201cipr&d 201d ) projects . during 2017 and 2016 , we recorded impairment losses of $ 18.8 million and $ 30.0 million , respectively , related to these ipr&d intangible assets . the impairments were primarily due to the termination of certain ipr&d projects . we also recognized $ 479.0 million of intangible assets for trademarks that we designated as having an indefinite life . during 2017 , we reclassified one of these trademarks to a finite life asset which resulted in an impairment of $ 8.0 million . loss/impairment on disposal of assets relates to assets that we have sold or intend to sell , or for which the economic useful life of the asset has been significantly reduced due to integration or our quality and operational excellence initiatives . contingent consideration adjustments represent the changes in the fair value of contingent consideration obligations to be paid to the prior owners of acquired businesses . certain r&d agreements relate to agreements with upfront payments to obtain intellectual property to be used in r&d projects that have no alternative future use in other projects . cash and cash equivalents 2013 we consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents . the carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents are valued at cost , which approximates their fair value . accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable consists of trade and other miscellaneous receivables . we grant credit to customers in the normal course of business and maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for potential credit losses . we determine the allowance for doubtful accounts by geographic market and take into consideration historical credit experience , creditworthiness of the customer and other pertinent information . we make concerted efforts to collect all accounts receivable , but sometimes we have to write-off the account against the allowance when we determine the account is uncollectible . the allowance for doubtful accounts was $ 60.2 million and $ 51.6 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . inventories 2013 inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market , with cost determined on a first-in first-out basis . property , plant and equipment 2013 property , plant and equipment is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation . depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives of ten to forty years for buildings and improvements and three to eight years for machinery and equipment . maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred . we review property , plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable . an impairment loss would be recognized when estimated future undiscounted cash flows relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount . an impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its fair value . software costs 2013 we capitalize certain computer software and software development costs incurred in connection with developing or obtaining computer software for internal use when both the preliminary project stage is completed and it is probable that the software will be used as intended . capitalized software costs generally include external direct costs of materials and services utilized in developing or obtaining computer software and compensation and related .\nQuestion: what was the allowance for doubtful accounts as of 12/31/17?\nAnswer: 60.2\nQuestion: and in 2016?\nAnswer: 51.6\nQuestion: so what was the difference between these two values?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "8.6" } ]
CONVFINQA5761	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin september 2007 , we reached a settlement with the united states department of justice in an ongoing investigation into financial relationships between major orthopaedic manufacturers and consulting orthopaedic surgeons . under the terms of the settlement , we paid a civil settlement amount of $ 169.5 million and we recorded an expense in that amount . no tax benefit has been recorded related to the settlement expense due to the uncertainty as to the tax treatment . we intend to pursue resolution of this uncertainty with taxing authorities , but are unable to ascertain the outcome or timing for such resolution at this time . for more information regarding the settlement , see note 15 . in june 2006 , the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) issued interpretation no . 48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes 2013 an interpretation of fasb statement no . 109 , accounting for income taxes ( fin 48 ) . fin 48 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements . under fin 48 , we may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities , based on the technical merits of the position . the tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement . fin 48 also provides guidance on derecognition , classification , interest and penalties on income taxes , accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures . we adopted fin 48 on january 1 , 2007 . prior to the adoption of fin 48 we had a long term tax liability for expected settlement of various federal , state and foreign income tax liabilities that was reflected net of the corollary tax impact of these expected settlements of $ 102.1 million , as well as a separate accrued interest liability of $ 1.7 million . as a result of the adoption of fin 48 , we are required to present the different components of such liability on a gross basis versus the historical net presentation . the adoption resulted in the financial statement liability for unrecognized tax benefits decreasing by $ 6.4 million as of january 1 , 2007 . the adoption resulted in this decrease in the liability as well as a reduction to retained earnings of $ 4.8 million , a reduction in goodwill of $ 61.4 million , the establishment of a tax receivable of $ 58.2 million , which was recorded in other current and non-current assets on our consolidated balance sheet , and an increase in an interest/penalty payable of $ 7.9 million , all as of january 1 , 2007 . therefore , after the adoption of fin 48 , the amount of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 95.7 million as of january 1 , 2007 , of which $ 28.6 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized . the amount of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 135.2 million as of december 31 , 2007 . of this amount , $ 41.0 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at january 1 2007</td><td>$ 95.7</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>increases related to prior periods</td><td>27.4</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>decreases related to prior periods</td><td>-5.5 ( 5.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>increases related to current period</td><td>21.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-1.3 ( 1.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases related to lapse of statue of limitations</td><td>-3.0 ( 3.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 135.2</td></tr></table> we recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of earnings , which is consistent with the recognition of these items in prior reporting periods . as of january 1 , 2007 , we recorded a liability of $ 9.6 million for accrued interest and penalties , of which $ 7.5 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized . the amount of this liability is $ 19.6 million as of december 31 , 2007 . of this amount , $ 14.7 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized . we expect that the amount of tax liability for unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next twelve months ; however , we do not expect these changes will have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial position . the u.s . federal statute of limitations remains open for the year 2003 and onward with years 2003 and 2004 currently under examination by the irs . it is reasonably possible that a resolution with the irs for the years 2003 through 2004 will be reached within the next twelve months , but we do not anticipate this would result in any material impact on our financial position . in addition , for the 1999 tax year of centerpulse , which we acquired in october 2003 , one issue remains in dispute . the resolution of this issue would not impact our effective tax rate , as it would be recorded as an adjustment to goodwill . state income tax returns are generally subject to examination for a period of 3 to 5 years after filing of the respective return . the state impact of any federal changes remains subject to examination by various states for a period of up to one year after formal notification to the states . we have various state income tax returns in the process of examination , administrative appeals or litigation . it is reasonably possible that such matters will be resolved in the next twelve months , but we do not anticipate that the resolution of these matters would result in any material impact on our results of operations or financial position . foreign jurisdictions have statutes of limitations generally ranging from 3 to 5 years . years still open to examination by foreign tax authorities in major jurisdictions include australia ( 2003 onward ) , canada ( 1999 onward ) , france ( 2005 onward ) , germany ( 2005 onward ) , italy ( 2003 onward ) , japan ( 2001 onward ) , puerto rico ( 2005 onward ) , singapore ( 2003 onward ) , switzerland ( 2004 onward ) , and the united kingdom ( 2005 onward ) . z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 7 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what was the balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of 12/31/07?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "135.2" } ]
CONVFINQA9682	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nunited parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations liquidity and capital resources as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 4.069 billion in cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities . we believe that our current cash position , access to the long-term debt capital markets and cash flow generated from operations should be adequate not only for operating requirements but also to enable us to complete our capital expenditure programs and to fund dividend payments , share repurchases and long-term debt payments through the next several years . in addition , we have funds available from our commercial paper program and the ability to obtain alternative sources of financing . we regularly evaluate opportunities to optimize our capital structure , including through issuances of debt to refinance existing debt and to fund ongoing cash needs . cash flows from operating activities the following is a summary of the significant sources ( uses ) of cash from operating activities ( amounts in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 4910</td><td>$ 3431</td><td>$ 4844</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-cash operating activities ( 1 )</td><td>5776</td><td>6444</td><td>4122</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans )</td><td>-7794 ( 7794 )</td><td>-2668 ( 2668 )</td><td>-1229 ( 1229 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hedge margin receivables and payables</td><td>-732 ( 732 )</td><td>-142 ( 142 )</td><td>170</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>income tax receivables and payables</td><td>-550 ( 550 )</td><td>-505 ( 505 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>changes in working capital and other non-current assets and liabilities</td><td>-178 ( 178 )</td><td>-62 ( 62 )</td><td>-418 ( 418 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other operating activities</td><td>47</td><td>-25 ( 25 )</td><td>-53 ( 53 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net cash from operating activities</td><td>$ 1479</td><td>$ 6473</td><td>$ 7430</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) represents depreciation and amortization , gains and losses on derivative transactions and foreign exchange , deferred income taxes , provisions for uncollectible accounts , pension and postretirement benefit expense , stock compensation expense and other non-cash items . cash from operating activities remained strong throughout 2015 to 2017 . most of the variability in operating cash flows during the 2015 to 2017 time period relates to the funding of our company-sponsored pension and postretirement benefit plans ( and related cash tax deductions ) . except for discretionary or accelerated fundings of our plans , contributions to our company- sponsored pension plans have largely varied based on whether any minimum funding requirements are present for individual pension plans . 2022 we made discretionary contributions to our three primary company-sponsored u.s . pension plans totaling $ 7.291 , $ 2.461 and $ 1.030 billion in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . 2022 the remaining contributions from 2015 to 2017 were largely due to contributions to our international pension plans and u.s . postretirement medical benefit plans . apart from the transactions described above , operating cash flow was impacted by changes in our working capital position , payments for income taxes and changes in hedge margin payables and receivables . cash payments for income taxes were $ 1.559 , $ 2.064 and $ 1.913 billion for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , and were primarily impacted by the timing of current tax deductions . the net hedge margin collateral ( paid ) /received from derivative counterparties was $ ( 732 ) , $ ( 142 ) and $ 170 million during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively , due to settlements and changes in the fair value of the derivative contracts used in our currency and interest rate hedging programs . as of december 31 , 2017 , the total of our worldwide holdings of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities were $ 4.069 billion , of which approximately $ 1.800 billion was held by foreign subsidiaries . the amount of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities held by our u.s . and foreign subsidiaries fluctuates throughout the year due to a variety of factors , including the timing of cash receipts and disbursements in the normal course of business . cash provided by operating activities in the u.s . continues to be our primary source of funds to finance domestic operating needs , capital expenditures , share repurchases and dividend payments to shareowners . as a result of the tax act , all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities held by foreign subsidiaries are generally available for distribution to the u.s . without any u.s . federal income taxes . any such distributions may be subject to foreign withholding and u.s . state taxes . when amounts earned by foreign subsidiaries are expected to be indefinitely reinvested , no accrual for taxes is provided. .\nQuestion: what were the pension and postretirement plan contributions in 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2668.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6702	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 17 . pension plans and postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plans ( continued ) benefit payments the following table sets forth amounts of benefits expected to be paid over the next ten years from the company 2019s pension and postretirement plans as of december 31 , 2004: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>pension benefits</td><td>other postretirement benefits</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>$ 125</td><td>$ 30</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>132</td><td>31</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>143</td><td>31</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>154</td><td>33</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2009</td><td>166</td><td>34</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2010-2014</td><td>1052</td><td>193</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1772</td><td>$ 352</td></tr></table> 18 . stock compensation plans on may 18 , 2000 , the shareholders of the hartford approved the hartford incentive stock plan ( the 201c2000 plan 201d ) , which replaced the hartford 1995 incentive stock plan ( the 201c1995 plan 201d ) . the terms of the 2000 plan were substantially similar to the terms of the 1995 plan except that the 1995 plan had an annual award limit and a higher maximum award limit . under the 2000 plan , awards may be granted in the form of non-qualified or incentive stock options qualifying under section 422a of the internal revenue code , performance shares or restricted stock , or any combination of the foregoing . in addition , stock appreciation rights may be granted in connection with all or part of any stock options granted under the 2000 plan . in december 2004 , the 2000 plan was amended to allow for grants of restricted stock units effective as of january 1 , 2005 . the aggregate number of shares of stock , which may be awarded , is subject to a maximum limit of 17211837 shares applicable to all awards for the ten-year duration of the 2000 plan . all options granted have an exercise price equal to the market price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant , and an option 2019s maximum term is ten years and two days . certain options become exercisable over a three year period commencing one year from the date of grant , while certain other options become exercisable upon the attainment of specified market price appreciation of the company 2019s common shares . for any year , no individual employee may receive an award of options for more than 1000000 shares . as of december 31 , 2004 , the hartford had not issued any incentive stock options under the 2000 plan . performance awards of common stock granted under the 2000 plan become payable upon the attainment of specific performance goals achieved over a period of not less than one nor more than five years , and the restricted stock granted is subject to a restriction period . on a cumulative basis , no more than 20% ( 20 % ) of the aggregate number of shares which may be awarded under the 2000 plan are available for performance shares and restricted stock awards . also , the maximum award of performance shares for any individual employee in any year is 200000 shares . in 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , the company granted shares of common stock of 315452 , 333712 and 40852 with weighted average prices of $ 64.93 , $ 38.13 and $ 62.28 , respectively , related to performance share and restricted stock awards . in 1996 , the company established the hartford employee stock purchase plan ( 201cespp 201d ) . under this plan , eligible employees of the hartford may purchase common stock of the company at a 15% ( 15 % ) discount from the lower of the closing market price at the beginning or end of the quarterly offering period . the company may sell up to 5400000 shares of stock to eligible employees under the espp . in 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , 345262 , 443467 and 408304 shares were sold , respectively . the per share weighted average fair value of the discount under the espp was $ 9.31 , $ 11.96 , and $ 11.70 in 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . additionally , during 1997 , the hartford established employee stock purchase plans for certain employees of the company 2019s international subsidiaries . under these plans , participants may purchase common stock of the hartford at a fixed price at the end of a three-year period . the activity under these programs is not material. .\nQuestion: what was the expected payment for all benefits in 2007?\nAnswer: 174.0\nQuestion: and what was that expected payment for all years?\nAnswer: 2124.0\nQuestion: what portion of this payment was represented by pension benefits?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.83427" } ]
CONVFINQA1099	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe aeronautics segment generally includes fewer programs that have much larger sales and operating results than programs included in the other segments . due to the large number of comparatively smaller programs in the remaining segments , the discussion of the results of operations of those business segments focuses on lines of business within the segment rather than on specific programs . the following tables of financial information and related discussion of the results of operations of our business segments are consistent with the presentation of segment information in note 5 to the financial statements . we have a number of programs that are classified by the u.s . government and cannot be specifically described . the operating results of these classified programs are included in our consolidated and business segment results , and are subjected to the same oversight and internal controls as our other programs . aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support , and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles , and related technologies . key combat aircraft programs include the f-35 lightning ii , f-16 fighting falcon , and f-22 raptor fighter aircraft . key air mobility programs include the c-130j super hercules and the c-5m super galaxy . aeronautics provides logistics support , sustainment , and upgrade modification services for its aircraft . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 13235</td><td>$ 12201</td><td>$ 11473</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1502</td><td>1577</td><td>1433</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>11.3% ( 11.3 % )</td><td>12.9% ( 12.9 % )</td><td>12.5% ( 12.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>27500</td><td>26700</td><td>27200</td></tr></table> net sales for aeronautics increased by 8% ( 8 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 . sales increased in all three lines of business during the year . the $ 800 million increase in air mobility primarily was attributable to higher volume on c-130 programs , including deliveries and support activities , as well as higher volume on the c-5 reliability enhancement and re-engining program ( rerp ) . there were 25 c-130j deliveries in 2010 compared to 16 in 2009 . the $ 179 million increase in combat aircraft principally was due to higher volume on f-35 production contracts , which partially was offset by lower volume on the f-35 sdd contract and a decline in volume on f-16 , f-22 and other combat aircraft programs . there were 20 f-16 deliveries in 2010 compared to 31 in 2009 . the $ 55 million increase in other aeronautics programs mainly was due to higher volume on p-3 and advanced development programs , which partially were offset by a decline in volume on sustainment activities . net sales for aeronautics increased by 6% ( 6 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 . during the year , sales increased in all three lines of business . the increase of $ 296 million in air mobility 2019s sales primarily was attributable to higher volume on the c-130 programs , including deliveries and support activities . there were 16 c-130j deliveries in 2009 and 12 in 2008 . combat aircraft sales increased $ 316 million principally due to higher volume on the f-35 program and increases in f-16 deliveries , which partially were offset by lower volume on f-22 and other combat aircraft programs . there were 31 f-16 deliveries in 2009 compared to 28 in 2008 . the $ 116 million increase in other aeronautics programs mainly was due to higher volume on p-3 programs and advanced development programs , which partially were offset by declines in sustainment activities . operating profit for the segment decreased by 5% ( 5 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 . a decline in operating profit in combat aircraft partially was offset by increases in other aeronautics programs and air mobility . the $ 149 million decrease in combat aircraft 2019s operating profit primarily was due to lower volume and a decrease in the level of favorable performance adjustments on the f-22 program , the f-35 sdd contract and f-16 and other combat aircraft programs in 2010 . these decreases more than offset increased operating profit resulting from higher volume and improved performance on f-35 production contracts in 2010 . the $ 35 million increase in other aeronautics programs mainly was attributable to higher volume and improved performance on p-3 and advanced development programs as well as an increase in the level of favorable performance adjustments on sustainment activities in 2010 . the $ 19 million increase in air mobility operating profit primarily was due to higher volume and improved performance in 2010 on c-130j support activities , which more than offset a decrease in operating profit due to a lower level of favorable performance adjustments on c-130j deliveries in 2010 . the remaining change in operating profit is attributable to an increase in other income , net between the comparable periods . aeronautics 2019 2010 operating margins have decreased when compared to 2009 . the operating margin decrease reflects the life cycles of our significant programs . specifically , aeronautics is performing more development and initial production work on the f-35 program and is performing less work on more mature programs such as the f-22 and f-16 . development and initial production contracts yield lower profits than mature full rate programs . accordingly , while net sales increased in 2010 relative to 2009 , operating profit decreased and consequently operating margins have declined. .\nQuestion: what what the net change in operating income from 2009 to 2010?\nAnswer: -75.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1577.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1337	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\njpmorgan chase & co./2015 annual report 67 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of 87 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in dollars )</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>jpmorgan chase</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 80.03</td><td>$ 108.98</td><td>$ 148.98</td><td>$ 163.71</td><td>$ 177.40</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100.00</td><td>76.82</td><td>102.19</td><td>140.77</td><td>153.96</td><td>154.71</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100.00</td><td>82.94</td><td>106.78</td><td>144.79</td><td>166.76</td><td>164.15</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>102.11</td><td>118.44</td><td>156.78</td><td>178.22</td><td>180.67</td></tr></table> december 31 , ( in dollars ) .\nQuestion: what is the change in value of the s&p from 2010 to 2015?\nAnswer: 80.67\nQuestion: assuming an initial investment of $100, what was the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.8067" } ]
CONVFINQA228	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin accordance with sfas no . 142 , goodwill and other intangible assets , the goodwill is not amortized , but will be subject to a periodic assessment for impairment by applying a fair-value-based test . none of this goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . the company performs its annual test for impairment of goodwill in may of each year . the company is required to perform a periodic assessment between annual tests in certain circumstances . the company has performed its annual test of goodwill as of may 1 , 2006 and has determined there was no impairment of goodwill during 2006 . the company allocated $ 15.8 million of the purchase price to in-process research and development projects . in-process research and development ( ipr&d ) represents the valuation of acquired , to-be- completed research projects . at the acquisition date , cyvera 2019s ongoing research and development initiatives were primarily involved with the development of its veracode technology and the beadxpress reader . these two projects were approximately 50% ( 50 % ) and 25% ( 25 % ) complete at the date of acquisition , respectively . as of december 31 , 2006 , these two projects were approximately 90% ( 90 % ) and 80% ( 80 % ) complete , respectively . the value assigned to purchased ipr&d was determined by estimating the costs to develop the acquired technology into commercially viable products , estimating the resulting net cash flows from the projects , and discounting the net cash flows to their present value . the revenue projections used to value the ipr&d were , in some cases , reduced based on the probability of developing a new technology , and considered the relevant market sizes and growth factors , expected trends in technology , and the nature and expected timing of new product introductions by the company and its competitors . the resulting net cash flows from such projects are based on the company 2019s estimates of cost of sales , operating expenses , and income taxes from such projects . the rates utilized to discount the net cash flows to their present value were based on estimated cost of capital calculations . due to the nature of the forecast and the risks associated with the projected growth and profitability of the developmental projects , discount rates of 30% ( 30 % ) were considered appropriate for the ipr&d . the company believes that these discount rates were commensurate with the projects 2019stage of development and the uncertainties in the economic estimates described above . if these projects are not successfully developed , the sales and profitability of the combined company may be adversely affected in future periods . the company believes that the foregoing assumptions used in the ipr&d analysis were reasonable at the time of the acquisition . no assurance can be given , however , that the underlying assumptions used to estimate expected project sales , development costs or profitability , or the events associated with such projects , will transpire as estimated . at the date of acquisition , the development of these projects had not yet reached technological feasibility , and the research and development in progress had no alternative future uses . accordingly , these costs were charged to expense in the second quarter of 2005 . the following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of the company 2019s operations for the years ended january 1 , 2006 and january 2 , 2005 as though the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented ( in thousands , except per share data ) : year ended january 1 , year ended january 2 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year ended january 1 2006</td><td>year ended january 2 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 73501</td><td>$ 50583</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net loss</td><td>-6234 ( 6234 )</td><td>-9965 ( 9965 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net loss per share basic and diluted</td><td>-0.15 ( 0.15 )</td><td>-0.27 ( 0.27 )</td></tr></table> illumina , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what was the revenue in the year of 2006?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "73501.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3800	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nbuilding . the construction of the building was completed in december 2003 . due to lower than expected financing and construction costs , the final lease balance was lowered to $ 103.0 million . as part of the agreement , we entered into a five-year lease that began upon the completion of the building . at the end of the lease term , we can purchase the building for the lease balance , remarket or relinquish the building . if we choose to remarket or are required to do so upon relinquishing the building , we are bound to arrange the sale of the building to an unrelated party and will be required to pay the lessor any shortfall between the net remarketing proceeds and the lease balance , up to the maximum recourse amount of $ 90.8 million ( 201cresidual value guarantee 201d ) . see note 14 in our notes to consolidated financial statements for further information . in august 1999 , we entered into a five-year lease agreement for our other two office buildings that currently serve as our corporate headquarters in san jose , california . under the agreement , we have the option to purchase the buildings at any time during the lease term for the lease balance , which is approximately $ 142.5 million . we are in the process of evaluating alternative financing methods at expiration of the lease in fiscal 2004 and believe that several suitable financing options will be available to us . at the end of the lease term , we can purchase the buildings for the lease balance , remarket or relinquish the buildings . if we choose to remarket or are required to do so upon relinquishing the buildings , we are bound to arrange the sale of the buildings to an unrelated party and will be required to pay the lessor any shortfall between the net remarketing proceeds and the lease balance , up to the maximum recourse amount of $ 132.6 million ( 201cresidual value guarantee 201d ) . for further information , see note 14 in our notes to consolidated financial statements . the two lease agreements discussed above are subject to standard financial covenants . the agreements limit the amount of indebtedness we can incur . a leverage covenant requires us to keep our debt to ebitda ratio less than 2.5:1.0 . as of november 28 , 2003 , our debt to ebitda ratio was 0.53:1.0 , well within the limit . we also have a liquidity covenant which requires us to maintain a quick ratio equal to or greater than 1.0 . as of november 28 , 2003 , our quick ratio was 2.2 , well above the minimum . we expect to remain within compliance in the next 12 months . we are comfortable with these limitations and believe they will not impact our cash or credit in the coming year or restrict our ability to execute our business plan . the following table summarizes our contractual commitments as of november 28 , 2003 : less than over total 1 year 1 2013 3 years 3-5 years 5 years non-cancelable operating leases , net of sublease income ................ . $ 83.9 $ 23.6 $ 25.9 $ 16.3 $ 18.1 indemnifications in the normal course of business , we provide indemnifications of varying scope to customers against claims of intellectual property infringement made by third parties arising from the use of our products . historically , costs related to these indemnification provisions have not been significant and we are unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these indemnification provisions on our future results of operations . we have commitments to make certain milestone and/or retention payments typically entered into in conjunction with various acquisitions , for which we have made accruals in our consolidated financial statements . in connection with our purchases of technology assets during fiscal 2003 , we entered into employee retention agreements totaling $ 2.2 million . we are required to make payments upon satisfaction of certain conditions in the agreements . as permitted under delaware law , we have agreements whereby we indemnify our officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is , or was serving , at our request in such capacity . the indemnification period covers all pertinent events and occurrences during the officer 2019s or director 2019s lifetime . the maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited ; however , we have director and officer insurance coverage that limits our exposure and enables us to recover a portion of any future amounts paid . we believe the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements in excess of applicable insurance coverage is minimal. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total</td><td>less than 1 year</td><td>1-3 years</td><td>3-5 years</td><td>over 5 years</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-cancelable operating leases net of sublease income</td><td>$ 83.9</td><td>$ 23.6</td><td>$ 25.9</td><td>$ 16.3</td><td>$ 18.1</td></tr></table> building . the construction of the building was completed in december 2003 . due to lower than expected financing and construction costs , the final lease balance was lowered to $ 103.0 million . as part of the agreement , we entered into a five-year lease that began upon the completion of the building . at the end of the lease term , we can purchase the building for the lease balance , remarket or relinquish the building . if we choose to remarket or are required to do so upon relinquishing the building , we are bound to arrange the sale of the building to an unrelated party and will be required to pay the lessor any shortfall between the net remarketing proceeds and the lease balance , up to the maximum recourse amount of $ 90.8 million ( 201cresidual value guarantee 201d ) . see note 14 in our notes to consolidated financial statements for further information . in august 1999 , we entered into a five-year lease agreement for our other two office buildings that currently serve as our corporate headquarters in san jose , california . under the agreement , we have the option to purchase the buildings at any time during the lease term for the lease balance , which is approximately $ 142.5 million . we are in the process of evaluating alternative financing methods at expiration of the lease in fiscal 2004 and believe that several suitable financing options will be available to us . at the end of the lease term , we can purchase the buildings for the lease balance , remarket or relinquish the buildings . if we choose to remarket or are required to do so upon relinquishing the buildings , we are bound to arrange the sale of the buildings to an unrelated party and will be required to pay the lessor any shortfall between the net remarketing proceeds and the lease balance , up to the maximum recourse amount of $ 132.6 million ( 201cresidual value guarantee 201d ) . for further information , see note 14 in our notes to consolidated financial statements . the two lease agreements discussed above are subject to standard financial covenants . the agreements limit the amount of indebtedness we can incur . a leverage covenant requires us to keep our debt to ebitda ratio less than 2.5:1.0 . as of november 28 , 2003 , our debt to ebitda ratio was 0.53:1.0 , well within the limit . we also have a liquidity covenant which requires us to maintain a quick ratio equal to or greater than 1.0 . as of november 28 , 2003 , our quick ratio was 2.2 , well above the minimum . we expect to remain within compliance in the next 12 months . we are comfortable with these limitations and believe they will not impact our cash or credit in the coming year or restrict our ability to execute our business plan . the following table summarizes our contractual commitments as of november 28 , 2003 : less than over total 1 year 1 2013 3 years 3-5 years 5 years non-cancelable operating leases , net of sublease income ................ . $ 83.9 $ 23.6 $ 25.9 $ 16.3 $ 18.1 indemnifications in the normal course of business , we provide indemnifications of varying scope to customers against claims of intellectual property infringement made by third parties arising from the use of our products . historically , costs related to these indemnification provisions have not been significant and we are unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these indemnification provisions on our future results of operations . we have commitments to make certain milestone and/or retention payments typically entered into in conjunction with various acquisitions , for which we have made accruals in our consolidated financial statements . in connection with our purchases of technology assets during fiscal 2003 , we entered into employee retention agreements totaling $ 2.2 million . we are required to make payments upon satisfaction of certain conditions in the agreements . as permitted under delaware law , we have agreements whereby we indemnify our officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is , or was serving , at our request in such capacity . the indemnification period covers all pertinent events and occurrences during the officer 2019s or director 2019s lifetime . the maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited ; however , we have director and officer insurance coverage that limits our exposure and enables us to recover a portion of any future amounts paid . we believe the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements in excess of applicable insurance coverage is minimal. .\nQuestion: what is the amount of non-cancelable operating leases net of sublease income\tdue in less than 1 year?\nAnswer: 23.6\nQuestion: what about the total non-cancelable operating leases net of sublease income?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "83.9" } ]
CONVFINQA4618	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 10 . commitments and contingencies credit-related commitments and contingencies : credit-related financial instruments , which are off-balance sheet , include indemnified securities financing , unfunded commitments to extend credit or purchase assets , and standby letters of credit . the potential loss associated with indemnified securities financing , unfunded commitments and standby letters of credit is equal to the total gross contractual amount , which does not consider the value of any collateral . the following table summarizes the total gross contractual amounts of credit-related off-balance sheet financial instruments at december 31 . amounts reported do not reflect participations to independent third parties. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indemnified securities financing</td><td>$ 365251</td><td>$ 324590</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>asset purchase agreements ( 1 )</td><td>8211</td><td>31780</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>unfunded commitments to extend credit</td><td>18078</td><td>20981</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit</td><td>4784</td><td>6061</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amount for 2009 excludes agreements related to the commercial paper conduits , which were consolidated in may 2009 ; see note 11 . approximately 81% ( 81 % ) of the unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year from the date of issue . since many of these commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements . securities finance : on behalf of our customers , we lend their securities to creditworthy brokers and other institutions . we generally indemnify our customers for the fair market value of those securities against a failure of the borrower to return such securities . collateral funds received in connection with our securities finance services are held by us as agent and are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . we require the borrowers to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the securities borrowed . the borrowed securities are revalued daily to determine if additional collateral is necessary . in this regard , we held , as agent , cash and u.s . government securities with an aggregate fair value of $ 375.92 billion and $ 333.07 billion as collateral for indemnified securities on loan at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , presented in the table above . the collateral held by us is invested on behalf of our customers in accordance with their guidelines . in certain cases , the collateral is invested in third-party repurchase agreements , for which we indemnify the customer against loss of the principal invested . we require the repurchase agreement counterparty to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the amount of the repurchase agreement . the indemnified repurchase agreements and the related collateral are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . of the collateral of $ 375.92 billion at december 31 , 2009 and $ 333.07 billion at december 31 , 2008 referenced above , $ 77.73 billion at december 31 , 2009 and $ 68.37 billion at december 31 , 2008 was invested in indemnified repurchase agreements . we held , as agent , cash and securities with an aggregate fair value of $ 82.62 billion and $ 71.87 billion as collateral for indemnified investments in repurchase agreements at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 , respectively . legal proceedings : in the ordinary course of business , we and our subsidiaries are involved in disputes , litigation and regulatory inquiries and investigations , both pending and threatened . these matters , if resolved adversely against us , may result in monetary damages , fines and penalties or require changes in our business practices . the resolution of these proceedings is inherently difficult to predict . however , we do not believe that the amount of any judgment , settlement or other action arising from any pending proceeding will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , although the outcome of certain of the matters described below may have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations for the period in which such matter is resolved .\nQuestion: what was the change in value of standby letters of credit from 2008 to 2009?\nAnswer: -1277.0\nQuestion: what was the 2008 value of standby letters of credit?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "6061.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1245	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nair mobility sales declined by $ 535 million primarily due to c-130j deliveries ( 12 in 2006 compared to 15 in 2005 ) and lower volume on the c-5 program . combat aircraft sales increased by $ 292 million mainly due to higher f-35 and f-22 volume , partially offset by reduced volume on f-16 programs . other aeronautics programs sales increased by $ 83 million primarily due to higher volume in sustainment services activities . operating profit for the segment increased 21% ( 21 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . operating profit increases in combat aircraft more than offset decreases in other aeronautics programs and air mobility . combat aircraft operating profit increased $ 326 million mainly due to improved performance on f-22 and f-16 programs . air mobility and other aeronautics programs declined $ 77 million due to lower operating profit in support and sustainment activities . operating profit for the segment increased 20% ( 20 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased in both combat aircraft and air mobility . combat aircraft increased $ 114 million , mainly due to higher volume on the f-35 and f-22 programs , and improved performance on f-16 programs . the improvement for the year was also attributable in part to the fact that in 2005 , operating profit included a reduction in earnings on the f-35 program . air mobility operating profit increased $ 84 million , mainly due to improved performance on c-130j sustainment activities in 2006 . backlog decreased in 2007 as compared to 2006 primarily as a result of sales volume on the f-35 program . this decrease was offset partially by increased orders on the f-22 and c-130j programs . electronic systems electronic systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 11143</td><td>$ 10519</td><td>$ 9811</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1410</td><td>1264</td><td>1078</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>21200</td><td>19700</td><td>18600</td></tr></table> net sales for electronic systems increased by 6% ( 6 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . sales increased in missiles & fire control ( m&fc ) , maritime systems & sensors ( ms2 ) , and platform , training & energy ( pt&e ) . m&fc sales increased $ 258 million mainly due to higher volume in fire control systems and air defense programs , which more than offset declines in tactical missile programs . ms2 sales grew $ 254 million due to volume increases in undersea and radar systems activities that were offset partially by decreases in surface systems activities . pt&e sales increased $ 113 million , primarily due to higher volume in platform integration activities , which more than offset declines in distribution technology activities . net sales for electronic systems increased by 7% ( 7 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . higher volume in platform integration activities led to increased sales of $ 329 million at pt&e . ms2 sales increased $ 267 million primarily due to surface systems activities . air defense programs contributed to increased sales of $ 118 million at m&fc . operating profit for the segment increased by 12% ( 12 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 , representing an increase in all three lines of business during the year . operating profit increased $ 70 million at pt&e primarily due to higher volume and improved performance on platform integration activities . ms2 operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume on undersea and tactical systems activities that more than offset lower volume on surface systems activities . at m&fc , operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume in fire control systems and improved performance in tactical missile programs , which partially were offset by performance on certain international air defense programs in 2006 . operating profit for the segment increased by 17% ( 17 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased by $ 74 million at ms2 mainly due to higher volume on surface systems and undersea programs . pt&e operating profit increased $ 61 million mainly due to improved performance on distribution technology activities . higher volume on air defense programs contributed to a $ 52 million increase in operating profit at m&fc . the increase in backlog during 2007 over 2006 resulted primarily from increased orders for certain tactical missile programs and fire control systems at m&fc and platform integration programs at pt&e. .\nQuestion: what was the backlog in 2007?\nAnswer: 21200.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2006?\nAnswer: 19700.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\nAnswer: 1500.0\nQuestion: what was the backlog in 2006?\nAnswer: 19700.0\nQuestion: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2006 backlog, in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.07614" } ]
CONVFINQA10558	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the company has selected december 1 as the date to perform its annual impairment test . in performing its 2005 and 2004 testing , the company completed an internal appraisal and estimated the fair value of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information . based on the appraisals performed , the company determined that goodwill in its rental and management segment was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired customer base and network location intangibles</td><td>$ 2606546</td><td>$ 1369607</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred financing costs</td><td>65623</td><td>89736</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired licenses and other intangibles</td><td>51703</td><td>43404</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>2723872</td><td>1502747</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-646560 ( 646560 )</td><td>-517444 ( 517444 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets net</td><td>$ 2077312</td><td>$ 985303</td></tr></table> the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 aggregated approximately $ 136.0 million and $ 97.8 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 183.6 million , $ 178.3 million , $ 174.4 million , $ 172.7 million and $ 170.3 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 , 2009 and 2010 , respectively . these amounts are subject to changes in estimates until the preliminary allocation of the spectrasite purchase price is finalized . 6 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv azteca without penalty during the last fifty years of the agreement . the discount on the loan is being amortized to interest income 2014tv azteca , net , using the effective interest method over the seventy-year term of the loan . simultaneous with the signing of the loan agreement , the company also entered into a seventy year economic rights agreement with tv azteca regarding space not used by tv azteca on approximately 190 of its broadcast towers . in exchange for the issuance of the below market interest rate loan discussed above and the annual payment of $ 1.5 million to tv azteca ( under the economic rights agreement ) , the company has the right to market and lease the unused tower space on the broadcast towers ( the economic rights ) . tv azteca retains title to these towers and is responsible for their operation and maintenance . the company is entitled to 100% ( 100 % ) of the revenues generated from leases with tenants on the unused space and is responsible for any incremental operating expenses associated with those tenants. .\nQuestion: what was the total intangibles in 2005?\nAnswer: 2723872.0\nQuestion: and in 2004?\nAnswer: 1502747.0\nQuestion: so what was the difference in this value between the two years?\nAnswer: 1221125.0\nQuestion: and the value for 2004 again?\nAnswer: 1502747.0\nQuestion: so what was the percentage increase during this time?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.8126" } ]
CONVFINQA6442	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nkimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued investment in retail store leases 2014 the company has interests in various retail store leases relating to the anchor store premises in neighborhood and community shopping centers . these premises have been sublet to retailers who lease the stores pursuant to net lease agreements . income from the investment in these retail store leases during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , was approximately $ 1.6 million , $ 0.8 million and $ 2.7 million , respectively . these amounts represent sublease revenues during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , of approximately $ 5.9 million , $ 5.2 million and $ 7.1 million , respectively , less related expenses of $ 4.3 million , $ 4.4 million and $ 4.4 million , respectively . the company 2019s future minimum revenues under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant subleases and future minimum obligations through the remaining terms of its retail store leases , assuming no new or renegotiated leases are executed for such premises , for future years are as follows ( in millions ) : 2011 , $ 5.2 and $ 3.4 ; 2012 , $ 4.1 and $ 2.6 ; 2013 , $ 3.8 and $ 2.3 ; 2014 , $ 2.9 and $ 1.7 ; 2015 , $ 2.1 and $ 1.3 , and thereafter , $ 2.8 and $ 1.6 , respectively . leveraged lease 2014 during june 2002 , the company acquired a 90% ( 90 % ) equity participation interest in an existing leveraged lease of 30 properties . the properties are leased under a long-term bond-type net lease whose primary term expires in 2016 , with the lessee having certain renewal option rights . the company 2019s cash equity investment was approximately $ 4.0 million . this equity investment is reported as a net investment in leveraged lease in accordance with the fasb 2019s lease guidance . as of december 31 , 2010 , 18 of these properties were sold , whereby the proceeds from the sales were used to pay down the mortgage debt by approximately $ 31.2 million and the remaining 12 properties were encumbered by third-party non-recourse debt of approximately $ 33.4 million that is scheduled to fully amortize during the primary term of the lease from a portion of the periodic net rents receivable under the net lease . as an equity participant in the leveraged lease , the company has no recourse obligation for principal or interest payments on the debt , which is collateralized by a first mortgage lien on the properties and collateral assignment of the lease . accordingly , this obligation has been offset against the related net rental receivable under the lease . at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the company 2019s net investment in the leveraged lease consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>remaining net rentals</td><td>$ 37.6</td><td>$ 44.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>estimated unguaranteed residual value</td><td>31.7</td><td>31.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-recourse mortgage debt</td><td>-30.1 ( 30.1 )</td><td>-34.5 ( 34.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unearned and deferred income</td><td>-34.2 ( 34.2 )</td><td>-37.0 ( 37.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net investment in leveraged lease</td><td>$ 5.0</td><td>$ 4.3</td></tr></table> 10 . variable interest entities : consolidated operating properties 2014 included within the company 2019s consolidated operating properties at december 31 , 2010 are four consolidated entities that are vies and for which the company is the primary beneficiary . all of these entities have been established to own and operate real estate property . the company 2019s involvement with these entities is through its majority ownership of the properties . these entities were deemed vies primarily based on the fact that the voting rights of the equity investors are not proportional to their obligation to absorb expected losses or receive the expected residual returns of the entity and substantially all of the entity 2019s activities are conducted on behalf of the investor which has disproportionately fewer voting rights . the company determined that it was the primary beneficiary of these vies as a result of its controlling financial interest . during 2010 , the company sold two consolidated vie 2019s which the company was the primary beneficiary. .\nQuestion: what was the change in revenues generated through subleasing from 2009 to 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.7" } ]
CONVFINQA1224	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\noperating expenses operating expenses were $ 2.9 billion , an increase of 8% ( 8 % ) over 2000 . adjusted for the formation of citistreet , operating expenses grew 10% ( 10 % ) . expense growth in 2001 of 10% ( 10 % ) is significantly lower than the comparable 20% ( 20 % ) expense growth for 2000 compared to 1999 . state street successfully reduced the growth rate of expenses as revenue growth slowed during the latter half of 2000 and early 2001 . the expense growth in 2001 reflects higher expenses for salaries and employee benefits , as well as information systems and communications . o p e r a t i n g e x p e n s e s ( dollars in millions ) 2001 2000 1999 change adjusted change 00-01 ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td><td>1999</td><td>change 00-01</td><td>adjusted change 00-01 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>salaries and employee benefits</td><td>$ 1663</td><td>$ 1524</td><td>$ 1313</td><td>9% ( 9 % )</td><td>11% ( 11 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>information systems and communications</td><td>365</td><td>305</td><td>287</td><td>20</td><td>22</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>transaction processing services</td><td>247</td><td>268</td><td>237</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>occupancy</td><td>229</td><td>201</td><td>188</td><td>15</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>363</td><td>346</td><td>311</td><td>5</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total operating expenses</td><td>$ 2867</td><td>$ 2644</td><td>$ 2336</td><td>8</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>number of employees</td><td>19753</td><td>17604</td><td>17213</td><td>12</td><td>-</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) 2000 results adjusted for the formation of citistreet expenses related to salaries and employee benefits increased $ 139million in 2001 , or $ 163millionwhen adjusted for the formation of citistreet . the adjusted increase reflects more than 2100 additional staff to support the large client wins and new business from existing clients and acquisitions . this expense increase was partially offset by lower incentive-based compensation . information systems and communications expense was $ 365 million in 2001 , up 20% ( 20 % ) from the prior year . adjusted for the formation of citistreet , information systems and communications expense increased 22% ( 22 % ) . this growth reflects both continuing investment in software and hardware , aswell as the technology costs associated with increased staffing levels . expenses related to transaction processing services were $ 247 million , down $ 21 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) . these expenses are volume related and include external contract services , subcustodian fees , brokerage services and fees related to securities settlement . lower mutual fund shareholder activities , and lower subcustodian fees resulting from both the decline in asset values and lower transaction volumes , drove the decline . occupancy expensewas $ 229million , up 15% ( 15 % ) . the increase is due to expenses necessary to support state street 2019s global growth , and expenses incurred for leasehold improvements and other operational costs . other expenses were $ 363 million , up $ 17 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) . these expenses include professional services , advertising and sales promotion , and internal operational expenses . the increase over prior year is due to a $ 21 million increase in the amortization of goodwill , primarily from acquisitions in 2001 . in accordance with recent accounting pronouncements , goodwill amortization expense will be eliminated in 2002 . state street recorded approximately $ 38 million , or $ .08 per share after tax , of goodwill amortization expense in 2001 . state street 2019s cost containment efforts , which reduced discretionary spending , partially offset the increase in other expenses . state street corporation 9 .\nQuestion: what was the number of employees in 2001?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "19753.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7277	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\njpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 249 note 13 2013 securities financing activities jpmorgan chase enters into resale agreements , repurchase agreements , securities borrowed transactions and securities loaned transactions ( collectively , 201csecurities financing agreements 201d ) primarily to finance the firm 2019s inventory positions , acquire securities to cover short positions , accommodate customers 2019 financing needs , and settle other securities obligations . securities financing agreements are treated as collateralized financings on the firm 2019s consolidated balance sheets . resale and repurchase agreements are generally carried at the amounts at which the securities will be subsequently sold or repurchased , plus accrued interest . securities borrowed and securities loaned transactions are generally carried at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received . where appropriate under applicable accounting guidance , resale and repurchase agreements with the same counterparty are reported on a net basis . fees received and paid in connection with securities financing agreements are recorded in interest income and interest expense , respectively . the firm has elected the fair value option for certain securities financing agreements . for further information regarding the fair value option , see note 4 on pages 214 2013 216 of this annual report . the securities financing agreements for which the fair value option has been elected are reported within securities purchased under resale agreements ; securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements ; and securities borrowed on the consolidated balance sheets . generally , for agreements carried at fair value , current-period interest accruals are recorded within interest income and interest expense , with changes in fair value reported in principal transactions revenue . however , for financial instruments containing embedded derivatives that would be separately accounted for in accordance with accounting guidance for hybrid instruments , all changes in fair value , including any interest elements , are reported in principal transactions revenue . the following table details the firm 2019s securities financing agreements , all of which are accounted for as collateralized financings during the periods presented . december 31 , ( in millions ) 2012 2011 securities purchased under resale agreements ( a ) $ 295413 $ 235000 securities borrowed ( b ) 119017 142462 securities sold under repurchase agreements ( c ) $ 215560 $ 197789 securities loaned ( d ) 23582 14214 ( a ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included resale agreements of $ 24.3 billion and $ 22.2 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( b ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included securities borrowed of $ 10.2 billion and $ 15.3 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( c ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included repurchase agreements of $ 3.9 billion and $ 6.8 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( d ) at december 31 , 2012 , included securities loaned of $ 457 million accounted for at fair value . there were no securities loaned accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2011 . the amounts reported in the table above were reduced by $ 96.9 billion and $ 115.7 billion at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , as a result of agreements in effect that meet the specified conditions for net presentation under applicable accounting guidance . jpmorgan chase 2019s policy is to take possession , where possible , of securities purchased under resale agreements and of securities borrowed . the firm monitors the value of the underlying securities ( primarily g7 government securities , u.s . agency securities and agency mbs , and equities ) that it has received from its counterparties and either requests additional collateral or returns a portion of the collateral when appropriate in light of the market value of the underlying securities . margin levels are established initially based upon the counterparty and type of collateral and monitored on an ongoing basis to protect against declines in collateral value in the event of default . jpmorgan chase typically enters into master netting agreements and other collateral arrangements with its resale agreement and securities borrowed counterparties , which provide for the right to liquidate the purchased or borrowed securities in the event of a customer default . as a result of the firm 2019s credit risk mitigation practices with respect to resale and securities borrowed agreements as described above , the firm did not hold any reserves for credit impairment with respect to these agreements as of december 31 , 2012 and for further information regarding assets pledged and collateral received in securities financing agreements , see note 30 on pages 315 2013316 of this annual report. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>securities purchased under resale agreements ( a )</td><td>$ 295413</td><td>$ 235000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>securities borrowed ( b )</td><td>119017</td><td>142462</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>securities sold under repurchase agreements ( c )</td><td>$ 215560</td><td>$ 197789</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securities loaned ( d )</td><td>23582</td><td>14214</td></tr></table> jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 249 note 13 2013 securities financing activities jpmorgan chase enters into resale agreements , repurchase agreements , securities borrowed transactions and securities loaned transactions ( collectively , 201csecurities financing agreements 201d ) primarily to finance the firm 2019s inventory positions , acquire securities to cover short positions , accommodate customers 2019 financing needs , and settle other securities obligations . securities financing agreements are treated as collateralized financings on the firm 2019s consolidated balance sheets . resale and repurchase agreements are generally carried at the amounts at which the securities will be subsequently sold or repurchased , plus accrued interest . securities borrowed and securities loaned transactions are generally carried at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received . where appropriate under applicable accounting guidance , resale and repurchase agreements with the same counterparty are reported on a net basis . fees received and paid in connection with securities financing agreements are recorded in interest income and interest expense , respectively . the firm has elected the fair value option for certain securities financing agreements . for further information regarding the fair value option , see note 4 on pages 214 2013 216 of this annual report . the securities financing agreements for which the fair value option has been elected are reported within securities purchased under resale agreements ; securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements ; and securities borrowed on the consolidated balance sheets . generally , for agreements carried at fair value , current-period interest accruals are recorded within interest income and interest expense , with changes in fair value reported in principal transactions revenue . however , for financial instruments containing embedded derivatives that would be separately accounted for in accordance with accounting guidance for hybrid instruments , all changes in fair value , including any interest elements , are reported in principal transactions revenue . the following table details the firm 2019s securities financing agreements , all of which are accounted for as collateralized financings during the periods presented . december 31 , ( in millions ) 2012 2011 securities purchased under resale agreements ( a ) $ 295413 $ 235000 securities borrowed ( b ) 119017 142462 securities sold under repurchase agreements ( c ) $ 215560 $ 197789 securities loaned ( d ) 23582 14214 ( a ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included resale agreements of $ 24.3 billion and $ 22.2 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( b ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included securities borrowed of $ 10.2 billion and $ 15.3 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( c ) at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , included repurchase agreements of $ 3.9 billion and $ 6.8 billion , respectively , accounted for at fair value . ( d ) at december 31 , 2012 , included securities loaned of $ 457 million accounted for at fair value . there were no securities loaned accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2011 . the amounts reported in the table above were reduced by $ 96.9 billion and $ 115.7 billion at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , as a result of agreements in effect that meet the specified conditions for net presentation under applicable accounting guidance . jpmorgan chase 2019s policy is to take possession , where possible , of securities purchased under resale agreements and of securities borrowed . the firm monitors the value of the underlying securities ( primarily g7 government securities , u.s . agency securities and agency mbs , and equities ) that it has received from its counterparties and either requests additional collateral or returns a portion of the collateral when appropriate in light of the market value of the underlying securities . margin levels are established initially based upon the counterparty and type of collateral and monitored on an ongoing basis to protect against declines in collateral value in the event of default . jpmorgan chase typically enters into master netting agreements and other collateral arrangements with its resale agreement and securities borrowed counterparties , which provide for the right to liquidate the purchased or borrowed securities in the event of a customer default . as a result of the firm 2019s credit risk mitigation practices with respect to resale and securities borrowed agreements as described above , the firm did not hold any reserves for credit impairment with respect to these agreements as of december 31 , 2012 and for further information regarding assets pledged and collateral received in securities financing agreements , see note 30 on pages 315 2013316 of this annual report. .\nQuestion: what is the securities borrowed cost basis at december 31, 2012 in millions?\nAnswer: 119017.0\nQuestion: and what is that in billions?\nAnswer: 119.017\nQuestion: what is the securities borrowed at december 31, 2012 in billions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "10.2" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.