id
stringlengths 10
14
| entries
listlengths 2
2
|
|---|---|
CONVFINQA5106
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nkendal vroman , 39 mr . vroman has served as our managing director , commodity products , otc services & information products since february 2010 . mr . vroman previously served as managing director and chief corporate development officer from 2008 to 2010 . mr . vroman joined us in 2001 and since then has held positions of increasing responsibility , including most recently as managing director , corporate development and managing director , information and technology services . scot e . warren , 47 mr . warren has served as our managing director , equity index products and index services since february 2010 . mr . warren previously served as our managing director , equity products since joining us in 2007 . prior to that , mr . warren worked for goldman sachs as its president , manager trading and business analysis team . prior to goldman sachs , mr . warren managed equity and option execution and clearing businesses for abn amro in chicago and was a senior consultant for arthur andersen & co . for financial services firms . financial information about geographic areas due to the nature of its business , cme group does not track revenues based upon geographic location . we do , however , track trading volume generated outside of traditional u.s . trading hours and through our international telecommunication hubs . our customers can directly access our exchanges throughout the world . the following table shows the percentage of our total trading volume on our globex electronic trading platform generated during non-u.s . hours and through our international hubs. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>trading during non-u.s . hours</td><td>13% ( 13 % )</td><td>9% ( 9 % )</td><td>11% ( 11 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trading through telecommunication hubs</td><td>8</td><td>7</td><td>8</td></tr></table> available information our web site is www.cmegroup.com . information made available on our web site does not constitute part of this document . we make available on our web site our annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8-k and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such materials to the sec . our corporate governance materials , including our corporate governance principles , director conflict of interest policy , board of directors code of ethics , categorical independence standards , employee code of conduct and the charters for all the standing committees of our board , may also be found on our web site . copies of these materials are also available to shareholders free of charge upon written request to shareholder relations and member services , attention ms . beth hausoul , cme group inc. , 20 south wacker drive , chicago , illinois 60606. .\nQuestion: what was the percentage of trading during non-u.s. hours in 2008?\nAnswer: 11.0\nQuestion: and the portion that was traded during u.s. hours?\nAnswer: 89.0\nQuestion: and trading during non-u.s. hours for the next year?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "9.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4870
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndirect the activities of the vies and , therefore , do not control the ongoing activities that have a significant impact on the economic performance of the vies . additionally , we do not have the obligation to absorb losses of the vies or the right to receive benefits of the vies that could potentially be significant to the we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate these vies because our actions and decisions do not have the most significant effect on the vie 2019s performance and our fixed-price purchase options are not considered to be potentially significant to the vies . the future minimum lease payments associated with the vie leases totaled $ 3.0 billion as of december 31 , 2014 . 17 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 included $ 2454 million , net of $ 1210 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2486 million , net of $ 1092 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2014 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>$ 508</td><td>$ 253</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>484</td><td>249</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2017</td><td>429</td><td>246</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2018</td><td>356</td><td>224</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2019</td><td>323</td><td>210</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>1625</td><td>745</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum leasepayments</td><td>$ 3725</td><td>$ 1927</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-407 ( 407 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum leasepayments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1520</td></tr></table> approximately 95% ( 95 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 593 million in 2014 , $ 618 million in 2013 , and $ 631 million in 2012 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 18 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity ; however , to the extent possible , where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated , we have recorded a liability . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work . our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments . approximately 93% ( 93 % ) of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and approximately 7% ( 7 % ) is related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2014 . because of the uncertainty .\nQuestion: what is the sum of operating and capital leases in 2016?\nAnswer: 733.0\nQuestion: what were the total minimum lease payments for operating leases?\nAnswer: 3725.0\nQuestion: what was the value for capital leases?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1927.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4304
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n56 / 57 management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations junior subordinate deferrable interest debentures in june 2005 , we issued $ 100.0 a0million of trust preferred securities , which are reflected on the balance sheet as junior subordinate deferrable interest debentures . the proceeds were used to repay our revolving credit facility . the $ 100.0 a0million of junior subordi- nate deferrable interest debentures have a 30-year term ending july 2035 . they bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.61% ( 5.61 % ) for the first 10 years ending july 2015 . thereafter , the rate will float at three month libor plus 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) . the securities are redeemable at par . restrictive covenants the terms of the 2011 revolving credit facility and certain of our senior unsecured notes include certain restrictions and covenants which may limit , among other things , our ability to pay dividends ( as discussed below ) , make certain types of investments , incur additional indebtedness , incur liens and enter into negative pledge agreements and the disposition of assets , and which require compliance with financial ratios including our minimum tangible net worth , a maximum ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value , a minimum ratio of ebitda to fixed charges and a maximum ratio of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value . the dividend restriction referred to above provides that we will not during any time when we are in default , make distributions with respect to common stock or other equity interests , except to enable us to continue to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes . as of december a031 , 2011 and 2010 , we were in compli- ance with all such covenants . market rate risk we are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily from our floating rate borrowing arrangements . we use interest rate deriv- ative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes . a a0hypothetical 100 a0basis point increase in interest rates along the entire interest rate curve for 2011 and 2010 , would increase our annual interest cost by approximately $ 12.3 a0million and $ 11.0 a0mil- lion and would increase our share of joint venture annual interest cost by approximately $ 4.8 a0million and $ 6.7 a0million , respectively . we recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value . derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income . if a derivative is a hedge , depending on the nature of the hedge , changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset , liability , or firm commitment through earnings , or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings . the ineffective portion of a derivative 2019s change in fair value is recognized immediately in earnings . approximately $ 4.8 a0billion of our long- term debt bore interest a0at fixed rates , and therefore the fair value of these instru- ments is affected by changes in the market interest rates . the interest rate on our variable rate debt and joint venture debt as of december a031 , 2011 ranged from libor plus 150 a0basis points to libor plus 350 a0basis points . contractual obligations combined aggregate principal maturities of mortgages and other loans payable , our 2011 revolving credit facility , senior unsecured notes ( net of discount ) , trust preferred securities , our share of joint venture debt , including as- of-right extension options , estimated interest expense ( based on weighted average interest rates for the quarter ) , and our obligations under our capital lease and ground leases , as of december a031 , 2011 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property mortgages</td><td>$ 52443</td><td>$ 568649</td><td>$ 647776</td><td>$ 270382</td><td>$ 556400</td><td>$ 2278190</td><td>$ 4373840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>revolving credit facility</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>350000</td><td>2014</td><td>350000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trust preferred securities</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>100000</td><td>100000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>senior unsecured notes</td><td>119423</td><td>2014</td><td>98578</td><td>657</td><td>274804</td><td>777194</td><td>1270656</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>capital lease</td><td>1555</td><td>1555</td><td>1555</td><td>1592</td><td>1707</td><td>42351</td><td>50315</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>ground leases</td><td>33429</td><td>33429</td><td>33429</td><td>33429</td><td>33533</td><td>615450</td><td>782699</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>estimated interest expense</td><td>312672</td><td>309280</td><td>269286</td><td>244709</td><td>212328</td><td>470359</td><td>1818634</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>joint venture debt</td><td>176457</td><td>93683</td><td>123983</td><td>102476</td><td>527814</td><td>800102</td><td>1824515</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total</td><td>$ 695979</td><td>$ 1006596</td><td>$ 1174607</td><td>$ 653245</td><td>$ 1956586</td><td>$ 5083646</td><td>$ 10570659</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the sum of joint venture debt in 2012 and 2013?\nAnswer: 270140.0\nQuestion: what is the value including joint venture debt from 2014?\nAnswer: 394123.0\nQuestion: what is the total including 2015?\nAnswer: 496599.0\nQuestion: what is the total including 2016?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1024413.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10405
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following table details the growth in global weighted average berths and the global , north american , european and asia/pacific cruise guests over the past five years ( in thousands , except berth data ) : weighted- average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 ) global cruise guests ( 1 ) american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 ) european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 ) asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 )</td><td>globalcruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>north american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 )</td><td>european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 )</td><td>asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>425000</td><td>98650</td><td>20813</td><td>11641</td><td>6225</td><td>1474</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>432000</td><td>98750</td><td>21343</td><td>11710</td><td>6430</td><td>2045</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>448000</td><td>105750</td><td>22039</td><td>12269</td><td>6387</td><td>2382</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>469000</td><td>112700</td><td>23000</td><td>12004</td><td>6587</td><td>3129</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>493000</td><td>123270</td><td>24000</td><td>12581</td><td>6542</td><td>3636</td></tr></table> _______________________________________________________________________________ ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources . we use data obtained from seatrade insider , cruise industry news and company press releases to estimate weighted-average supply of berths and clia and g.p . wild to estimate cruise guest information . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) total berths include our berths related to our global brands and partner brands . ( 3 ) our estimates include the united states and canada . ( 4 ) our estimates include european countries relevant to the industry ( e.g. , nordics , germany , france , italy , spain and the united kingdom ) . ( 5 ) our estimates include the southeast asia ( e.g. , singapore , thailand and the philippines ) , east asia ( e.g. , china and japan ) , south asia ( e.g. , india and pakistan ) and oceanian ( e.g. , australia and fiji islands ) regions . north america the majority of industry cruise guests are sourced from north america , which represented approximately 52% ( 52 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 2% ( 2 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . europe industry cruise guests sourced from europe represented approximately 27% ( 27 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . asia/pacific industry cruise guests sourced from the asia/pacific region represented approximately 15% ( 15 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 25% ( 25 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . the asia/pacific region is experiencing the highest growth rate of the major regions , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america . competition we compete with a number of cruise lines . our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise line , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , p&o cruises , princess cruises and seabourn ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; and norwegian cruise line holdings ltd , which owns norwegian cruise line , oceania cruises and regent seven seas cruises . cruise lines compete with .\nQuestion: what were the number of global cruise guests in 2016?\nAnswer: 24000.0\nQuestion: what was the number of european guests?\nAnswer: 6542.0\nQuestion: what is the difference?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "17458.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA7363
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 9 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment . the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2009 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 55178</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2011</td><td>45275</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012</td><td>36841</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>30789</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>22094</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>59263</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 249440</td></tr></table> rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 57.2 million , $ 49.0 million and $ 26.6 million during the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2009 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 27.8 million . litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s . infringed on ford design patents . the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 . pursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the united states of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a united states design patent . we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell . the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income . we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business . we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows . note 10 . business combinations on october 1 , 2009 , we acquired greenleaf auto recyclers , llc ( 201cgreenleaf 201d ) from ssi for $ 38.8 million , net of cash acquired . greenleaf is the entity through which ssi operated its late model automotive parts recycling business . we recorded a gain on bargain purchase for the greenleaf acquisition totaling $ 4.3 million , which is .\nQuestion: what was the net change in value in the rental expense for operating leases from 2008 to 2009?\nAnswer: 8.2\nQuestion: what was the percent change?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.16735"
}
] |
CONVFINQA5177
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis methodology of computing massachusetts state income taxes resulting from legislation passed in the third quarter 2008 , which resulted in an income tax benefit of approximately $ 18.8 million . these factors were partially offset by : income taxes recorded by entergy power generation , llc , prior to its liquidation , resulting from the redemption payments it received in connection with its investment in entergy nuclear power marketing , llc during the third quarter 2008 , which resulted in an income tax expense of approximately $ 16.1 million ; book and tax differences for utility plant items and state income taxes at the utility operating companies , including the flow-through treatment of the entergy arkansas write-offs discussed above . the effective income tax rate for 2007 was 30.7% ( 30.7 % ) . the reduction in the effective income tax rate versus the federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) in 2007 is primarily due to : a reduction in income tax expense due to a step-up in the tax basis on the indian point 2 non-qualified decommissioning trust fund resulting from restructuring of the trusts , which reduced deferred taxes on the trust fund and reduced current tax expense ; the resolution of tax audit issues involving the 2002-2003 audit cycle ; an adjustment to state income taxes for non-utility nuclear to reflect the effect of a change in the methodology of computing new york state income taxes as required by that state's taxing authority ; book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction ; and the amortization of investment tax credits . these factors were partially offset by book and tax differences for utility plant items and state income taxes at the utility operating companies . see note 3 to the financial statements for a reconciliation of the federal statutory rate of 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) to the effective income tax rates , and for additional discussion regarding income taxes . liquidity and capital resources this section discusses entergy's capital structure , capital spending plans and other uses of capital , sources of capital , and the cash flow activity presented in the cash flow statement . capital structure entergy's capitalization is balanced between equity and debt , as shown in the following table . the decrease in the debt to capital percentage from 2008 to 2009 is primarily the result of an increase in shareholders' equity primarily due to an increase in retained earnings , partially offset by repurchases of common stock , along with a decrease in borrowings under entergy corporation's revolving credit facility . the increase in the debt to capital percentage from 2007 to 2008 is primarily the result of additional borrowings under entergy corporation's revolving credit facility. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net debt to net capital at the end of the year</td><td>53.5% ( 53.5 % )</td><td>55.6% ( 55.6 % )</td><td>54.7% ( 54.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of subtracting cash from debt</td><td>3.8% ( 3.8 % )</td><td>4.1% ( 4.1 % )</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>debt to capital at the end of the year</td><td>57.3% ( 57.3 % )</td><td>59.7% ( 59.7 % )</td><td>57.6% ( 57.6 % )</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the change in percentage points in debt-to-capital ratio from 2008 to 2009?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-2.4"
}
] |
CONVFINQA634
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 3 . business combinations purchase combinations . during the fiscal years presented , the company made a number of purchase acquisitions . for each acquisition , the excess of the purchase price over the estimated value of the net tangible assets acquired was allocated to various intangible assets , consisting primarily of developed technology , customer and contract-related assets and goodwill . the values assigned to developed technologies related to each acquisition were based upon future discounted cash flows related to the existing products 2019 projected income streams . goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase consideration over the fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the acquisitions , will not to be amortized . goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes . the amounts allocated to purchased in-process research and developments were determined through established valuation techniques in the high-technology industry and were expensed upon acquisition because technological feasibility had not been established and no future alternative uses existed . the consolidated financial statements include the operating results of each business from the date of acquisition . the company does not consider these acquisitions to be material to its results of operations and is therefore not presenting pro forma statements of operations for the fiscal years ended october 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 . fiscal 2006 acquisitions sigma-c software ag ( sigma-c ) the company acquired sigma-c on august 16 , 2006 in an all-cash transaction . reasons for the acquisition . sigma-c provides simulation software that allows semiconductor manufacturers and their suppliers to develop and optimize process sequences for optical lithography , e-beam lithography and next-generation lithography technologies . the company believes the acquisition will enable a tighter integration between design and manufacturing tools , allowing the company 2019s customers to perform more accurate design layout analysis with 3d lithography simulation and better understand issues that affect ic wafer yields . purchase price . the company paid $ 20.5 million in cash for the outstanding shares and shareholder notes of which $ 2.05 million was deposited with an escrow agent and will be paid per the escrow agreement . the company believes that the escrow amount will be paid . the total purchase consideration consisted of: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash paid</td><td>$ 20500</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>acquisition-related costs</td><td>2053</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total purchase price</td><td>$ 22553</td></tr></table> acquisition-related costs of $ 2.1 million consist primarily of legal , tax and accounting fees , estimated facilities closure costs and employee termination costs . as of october 31 , 2006 , the company had paid $ 0.9 million of the acquisition-related costs . the $ 1.2 million balance remaining at october 31 , 2006 primarily consists of legal , tax and accounting fees , estimated facilities closure costs and employee termination costs . assets acquired . the company performed a preliminary valuation and allocated the total purchase consideration to assets and liabilities . the company acquired $ 6.0 million of intangible assets consisting of $ 3.9 million in existing technology , $ 1.9 million in customer relationships and $ 0.2 million in trade names to be amortized over five years . the company also acquired assets of $ 3.9 million and assumed liabilities of $ 5.1 million as result of this transaction . goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the .\nQuestion: what was the amount of intangible assets acquired?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "6000.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4092
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the following table summarizes expected benefit payments through 2018 including those payments expected to be paid from the company 2019s general assets . since the majority of the benefit payments are made in the form of lump-sum distributions , actual benefit payments may differ from expected benefits payments. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 19766</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>18182</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>25518</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>21029</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>24578</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014 2013 2018</td><td>118709</td></tr></table> substantially all of the company 2019s u.s . employees are eligible to participate in a defined contribution savings plan ( the 201csavings plan 201d ) sponsored by the company . the savings plan allows employees to contribute a portion of their base compensation on a pre-tax and after-tax basis in accordance with specified guidelines . the company matches a percentage of employees 2019 contributions up to certain limits . in 2007 and prior years , the company could also contribute to the savings plan a discretionary profit sharing component linked to company performance during the prior year . beginning in 2008 , the discretionary profit sharing amount related to 2007 company performance was paid directly to employees as a short-term cash incentive bonus rather than as a contribution to the savings plan . in addition , the company has several defined contribution plans outside of the united states . the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans was $ 35341 , $ 26996 and $ 43594 for 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . the company had a value appreciation program ( 201cvap 201d ) , which was an incentive compensation plan established in 1995 . annual awards were granted to vap participants from 1995 through 1998 , which entitled participants to the net appreciation on a portfolio of securities of members of mastercard international . in 1999 , the vap was replaced by an executive incentive plan ( 201ceip 201d ) and the senior executive incentive plan ( 201cseip 201d ) ( together the 201ceip plans 201d ) ( see note 16 ( share based payments and other benefits ) ) . contributions to the vap have been discontinued , all plan assets have been disbursed and no vap liability remained as of december 31 , 2008 . the company 2019s liability related to the vap at december 31 , 2007 was $ 986 . the expense ( benefit ) was $ ( 6 ) , $ ( 267 ) and $ 3406 for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . note 12 . postemployment and postretirement benefits the company maintains a postretirement plan ( the 201cpostretirement plan 201d ) providing health coverage and life insurance benefits for substantially all of its u.s . employees and retirees hired before july 1 , 2007 . the company amended the life insurance benefits under the postretirement plan effective january 1 , 2007 . the impact , net of taxes , of this amendment was an increase of $ 1715 to accumulated other comprehensive income in 2007. .\nQuestion: what was the value of the expense related to all of the defined contribution plans in 2008?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "35341.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1498
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities at january 25 , 2019 , we had 26812 holders of record of our common stock , par value $ 1 per share . our common stock is traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol lmt . information concerning dividends paid on lockheed martin common stock during the past two years is as follows : common stock - dividends paid per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>quarter</td><td>dividends paid per share 2018</td><td>dividends paid per share 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>first</td><td>$ 2.00</td><td>$ 1.82</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>second</td><td>2.00</td><td>1.82</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third</td><td>2.00</td><td>1.82</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fourth</td><td>2.20</td><td>2.00</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>year</td><td>$ 8.20</td><td>$ 7.46</td></tr></table> stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the total return on a cumulative basis of $ 100 invested in lockheed martin common stock on december 31 , 2013 to the standard and poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 index and the s&p aerospace & defense index . the s&p aerospace & defense index comprises arconic inc. , general dynamics corporation , harris corporation , huntington ingalls industries , l3 technologies , inc. , lockheed martin corporation , northrop grumman corporation , raytheon company , textron inc. , the boeing company , transdigm group inc. , and united technologies corporation . the stockholder return performance indicated on the graph is not a guarantee of future performance. .\nQuestion: what is the total dividends paid per share during 2018?\nAnswer: 8.2\nQuestion: what about during 2017?\nAnswer: 7.46\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.74"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2739
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npension plan assets pension assets include public equities , government and corporate bonds , cash and cash equivalents , private real estate funds , private partnerships , hedge funds , and other assets . plan assets are held in a master trust and overseen by the company's investment committee . all assets are externally managed through a combination of active and passive strategies . managers may only invest in the asset classes for which they have been appointed . the investment committee is responsible for setting the policy that provides the framework for management of the plan assets . the investment committee has set the minimum and maximum permitted values for each asset class in the company's pension plan master trust for the year ended december 31 , 2018 , as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>u.s . equities</td><td>range 15</td><td>range -</td><td>range 36% ( 36 % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>international equities</td><td>10</td><td>-</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fixed income securities</td><td>25</td><td>-</td><td>50% ( 50 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>alternative investments</td><td>10</td><td>-</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td></tr></table> the general objectives of the company's pension asset strategy are to earn a rate of return over time to satisfy the benefit obligations of the plans , meet minimum erisa funding requirements , and maintain sufficient liquidity to pay benefits and address other cash requirements within the master trust . specific investment objectives include reducing the volatility of pension assets relative to benefit obligations , achieving a competitive , total investment return , achieving diversification between and within asset classes , and managing other risks . investment objectives for each asset class are determined based on specific risks and investment opportunities identified . decisions regarding investment policies and asset allocation are made with the understanding of the historical and prospective return and risk characteristics of various asset classes , the effect of asset allocations on funded status , future company contributions , and projected expenditures , including benefits . the company updates its asset allocations periodically . the company uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset mix and considers plan obligation characteristics , duration , liquidity characteristics , funding requirements , expected rates of return , regular rebalancing , and the distribution of returns . actual allocations to each asset class could vary from target allocations due to periodic investment strategy changes , short-term market value fluctuations , the length of time it takes to fully implement investment allocation positions , such as real estate and other alternative investments , and the timing of benefit payments and company contributions . taking into account the asset allocation ranges , the company determines the specific allocation of the master trust's investments within various asset classes . the master trust utilizes select investment strategies , which are executed through separate account or fund structures with external investment managers who demonstrate experience and expertise in the appropriate asset classes and styles . the selection of investment managers is done with careful evaluation of all aspects of performance and risk , demonstrated fiduciary responsibility , investment management experience , and a review of the investment managers' policies and processes . investment performance is monitored frequently against appropriate benchmarks and tracked to compliance guidelines with the assistance of third party consultants and performance evaluation tools and metrics . plan assets are stated at fair value . the company employs a variety of pricing sources to estimate the fair value of its pension plan assets , including independent pricing vendors , dealer or counterparty-supplied valuations , third- party appraisals , and appraisals prepared by the company's investment managers or other experts . investments in equity securities , common and preferred , are valued at the last reported sales price when an active market exists . securities for which official or last trade pricing on an active exchange is available are classified as level 1 . if closing prices are not available , securities are valued at the last trade price , if deemed reasonable , or a broker's quote in a non-active market , and are typically categorized as level 2 . investments in fixed-income securities are generally valued by independent pricing services or dealers who make markets in such securities . pricing methods are based upon market transactions for comparable securities and various relationships between securities that are generally recognized by institutional traders , and fixed-income securities typically are categorized as level 2. .\nQuestion: what is the maximum permitted value for u.s equities in the company's pension plan?\nAnswer: 0.36\nQuestion: and what is the minimum?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "15.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA5282
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nshareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/02</td><td>12/31/03</td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 119.89</td><td>$ 139.55</td><td>$ 124.88</td><td>$ 127.08</td><td>$ 122.64</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 128.68</td><td>$ 142.68</td><td>$ 149.69</td><td>$ 173.33</td><td>$ 182.85</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 131.84</td><td>$ 168.39</td><td>$ 188.00</td><td>$ 206.46</td><td>$ 209.40</td></tr></table> securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .\nQuestion: what was the value of the united parcel service inc . in 2007?\nAnswer: 122.64\nQuestion: what was, then, the change in its value, considering this 2007 one and the original amount invested in that stock in 2002?\nAnswer: 22.64\nQuestion: and how much does this change represent in relation to this original amount, in percentage?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.2264"
}
] |
CONVFINQA569
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions as a component of income tax expense and accounts for sales tax collected from customers and remitted to taxing authorities on a net basis . allowance for funds used during construction afudc is a non-cash credit to income with a corresponding charge to utility plant that represents the cost of borrowed funds or a return on equity funds devoted to plant under construction . the regulated utility subsidiaries record afudc to the extent permitted by the pucs . the portion of afudc attributable to borrowed funds is shown as a reduction of interest , net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . any portion of afudc attributable to equity funds would be included in other income ( expenses ) in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . afudc is summarized in the following table for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>allowance for other funds used during construction</td><td>$ 13</td><td>$ 9</td><td>$ 13</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>allowance for borrowed funds used during construction</td><td>8</td><td>6</td><td>6</td></tr></table> environmental costs the company 2019s water and wastewater operations are subject to u.s . federal , state , local and foreign requirements relating to environmental protection , and as such , the company periodically becomes subject to environmental claims in the normal course of business . environmental expenditures that relate to current operations or provide a future benefit are expensed or capitalized as appropriate . remediation costs that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations are accrued , on an undiscounted basis , when it is probable that these costs will be incurred and can be reasonably estimated . remediation costs accrued amounted to $ 1 and $ 2 as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the accrual relates entirely to a conservation agreement entered into by a subsidiary of the company with the national oceanic and atmospheric administration ( 201cnoaa 201d ) requiring the company to , among other provisions , implement certain measures to protect the steelhead trout and its habitat in the carmel river watershed in the state of california . the company has agreed to pay $ 1 annually from 2010 to 2016 . the company 2019s inception-to-date costs related to the noaa agreement were recorded in regulatory assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 and are expected to be fully recovered from customers in future rates . derivative financial instruments the company uses derivative financial instruments for purposes of hedging exposures to fluctuations in interest rates . these derivative contracts are entered into for periods consistent with the related underlying exposures and do not constitute positions independent of those exposures . the company does not enter into derivative contracts for speculative purposes and does not use leveraged instruments . all derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value . on the date the derivative contract is entered into , the company may designate the derivative as a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability ( fair-value hedge ) or a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability ( cash-flow hedge ) . changes in the fair value of a fair-value hedge , along with the gain or loss on the underlying hedged item , are recorded in current-period earnings . the effective portion of gains and losses on cash-flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income , until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows . any ineffective portion of designated hedges is recognized in current-period earnings . cash flows from derivative contracts are included in net cash provided by operating activities in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the allowance for other funds used during construction from 2013 to 2014?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-4.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA5488
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nas of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , our liabilities associated with unrecognized tax benefits are not material . we and our subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and various foreign jurisdictions . with few exceptions , the statute of limitations is no longer open for u.s . federal or non-u.s . income tax examinations for the years before 2011 , other than with respect to refunds . u.s . income taxes and foreign withholding taxes have not been provided on earnings of $ 291 million , $ 222 million and $ 211 million that have not been distributed by our non-u.s . companies as of december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 . our intention is to permanently reinvest these earnings , thereby indefinitely postponing their remittance to the u.s . if these earnings had been remitted , we estimate that the additional income taxes after foreign tax credits would have been approximately $ 55 million in 2014 , $ 50 million in 2013 and $ 45 million in 2012 . our federal and foreign income tax payments , net of refunds received , were $ 1.5 billion in 2014 , $ 787 million in 2013 and $ 890 million in 2012 . our 2014 and 2013 net payments reflect a $ 200 million and $ 550 million refund from the irs primarily attributable to our tax-deductible discretionary pension contributions during the fourth quarters of 2013 and 2012 , and our 2012 net payments reflect a $ 153 million refund from the irs related to a 2011 capital loss carryback . note 8 2013 debt our long-term debt consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes with rates from 2.13% ( 2.13 % ) to 6.15% ( 6.15 % ) due 2016 to 2042</td><td>$ 5642</td><td>$ 5642</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>notes with rates from 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) to 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) due 2016 to 2036</td><td>916</td><td>916</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other debt</td><td>483</td><td>476</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total long-term debt</td><td>7041</td><td>7034</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less : unamortized discounts</td><td>-872 ( 872 )</td><td>-882 ( 882 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total long-term debt net</td><td>$ 6169</td><td>$ 6152</td></tr></table> in august 2014 , we entered into a new $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks and concurrently terminated our existing $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility which was scheduled to expire in august 2016 . the new credit facility expires august 2019 and we may request and the banks may grant , at their discretion , an increase to the new credit facility of up to an additional $ 500 million . the credit facility also includes a sublimit of up to $ 300 million available for the issuance of letters of credit . there were no borrowings outstanding under the new facility through december 31 , 2014 . borrowings under the new credit facility would be unsecured and bear interest at rates based , at our option , on a eurodollar rate or a base rate , as defined in the new credit facility . each bank 2019s obligation to make loans under the credit facility is subject to , among other things , our compliance with various representations , warranties and covenants , including covenants limiting our ability and certain of our subsidiaries 2019 ability to encumber assets and a covenant not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio , as defined in the credit facility . the leverage ratio covenant excludes the adjustments recognized in stockholders 2019 equity related to postretirement benefit plans . as of december 31 , 2014 , we were in compliance with all covenants contained in the credit facility , as well as in our debt agreements . we have agreements in place with financial institutions to provide for the issuance of commercial paper . there were no commercial paper borrowings outstanding during 2014 or 2013 . if we were to issue commercial paper , the borrowings would be supported by the credit facility . in april 2013 , we repaid $ 150 million of long-term notes with a fixed interest rate of 7.38% ( 7.38 % ) due to their scheduled maturities . during the next five years , we have scheduled long-term debt maturities of $ 952 million due in 2016 and $ 900 million due in 2019 . interest payments were $ 326 million in 2014 , $ 340 million in 2013 and $ 378 million in 2012 . all of our existing unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness rank equally in right of payment . note 9 2013 postretirement plans defined benefit pension plans and retiree medical and life insurance plans many of our employees are covered by qualified defined benefit pension plans and we provide certain health care and life insurance benefits to eligible retirees ( collectively , postretirement benefit plans ) . we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit pension plans to provide for benefits in excess of qualified plan limits . non-union represented employees hired after december 2005 do not participate in our qualified defined benefit pension plans , but are eligible to participate in a qualified .\nQuestion: what was the value change in total long-term debt net from 2013 to 2014?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "17.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10750
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nrelated employer payroll tax costs ) . the contributions of these amounts are due by march 15 of the calendar year following the year in which the company realizes the benefits of the deductions . this arrangement has been accounted for as contingent consideration . pre-2009 business combinations were accounted for under a former accounting standard which , among other aspects , precluded the recognition of certain contingent consideration as of the business combination date . instead , under the former accounting standard , contingent consideration is accounted for as additional purchase price ( goodwill ) at the time the contingency is resolved . as of december 31 , 2013 , the company accrued $ 20.9 million related to this arrangement within other current liabilities , as the company realized the tax benefit of the compensation deductions during the 2013 tax year . the company made the related cash contribution during the first quarter of 2014 . 11 . earnings per share the numerator for both basic and diluted earnings per share is net income . the denominator for basic earnings per share is the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period . the 2013 denominator was impacted by the common shares issued during both the ipo and the underwriters' exercise in full of the overallotment option granted to them in connection with the ipo . because such common shares were issued on july 2 , 2013 and july 31 , 2013 , respectively , they are only partially reflected in the 2013 denominator . such shares are fully reflected in the 2014 denominator . see note 9 for additional discussion of the ipo . the dilutive effect of outstanding restricted stock , restricted stock units , stock options , coworker stock purchase plan units and mpk plan units is reflected in the denominator for diluted earnings per share using the treasury stock method . the following is a reconciliation of basic shares to diluted shares: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted-average shares - basic</td><td>170.6</td><td>156.6</td><td>145.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of dilutive securities</td><td>2.2</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average shares - diluted</td><td>172.8</td><td>158.7</td><td>145.8</td></tr></table> there was an insignificant amount of potential common shares excluded from diluted earnings per share for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , as their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect . 12 . deferred compensation plan on march 10 , 2010 , in connection with the company 2019s purchase of $ 28.5 million principal amount of its outstanding senior subordinated debt , the company established the restricted debt unit plan ( the 201crdu plan 201d ) , an unfunded nonqualified deferred compensation plan . the total number of rdus that could be granted under the rdu plan was 28500 . as of december 31 , 2014 , 28500 rdus were outstanding . rdus vested daily on a pro rata basis over the three-year period from january 1 , 2012 ( or , if later , the date of hire or the date of a subsequent rdu grant ) through december 31 , 2014 . all outstanding rdus were vested as of december 31 , 2014 . participants have no rights to the underlying debt . the total amount of compensation available to be paid under the rdu plan was initially to be based on two components , a principal component and an interest component . the principal component credits the rdu plan with a notional amount equal to the $ 28.5 million face value of the senior subordinated notes ( the \"debt pool\" ) , together with certain redemption premium equivalents as noted below . the interest component credited the rdu plan with amounts equal to the interest that would have been earned on the debt pool from march 10 , 2010 through maturity on october 12 , 2017 , except as discussed below . interest amounts for 2010 and 2011 were deferred until 2012 , and thereafter , interest amounts were paid to participants semi-annually on the interest payment due dates . the company used a portion of the ipo proceeds together with incremental borrowings to redeem $ 324.0 million of the total senior subordinated notes outstanding on august 1 , 2013 . in connection with the ipo and the partial redemption of the senior subordinated notes , the company amended the rdu plan to increase the retentive value of the plan . in accordance with the original terms of the rdu plan , the principal component of the rdus converted to a cash-denominated pool upon the redemption of the senior subordinated notes . in addition , the company added $ 0.1 table of contents cdw corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements .\nQuestion: what is the sum of the value of weighted average diluted shares in 2013 and 2014?\nAnswer: 331.5\nQuestion: what is the total sum including 2012?\nAnswer: 477.3\nQuestion: what is the total sum divided by 3?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "159.1"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8673
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhave access to liquidity by issuing bonds to public or private investors based on our assessment of the current condition of the credit markets . at december 31 , 2009 , we had a working capital surplus of approximately $ 1.0 billion , which reflects our decision to maintain additional cash reserves to enhance liquidity in response to difficult economic conditions . at december 31 , 2008 , we had a working capital deficit of approximately $ 100 million . historically , we have had a working capital deficit , which is common in our industry and does not indicate a lack of liquidity . we maintain adequate resources and , when necessary , have access to capital to meet any daily and short-term cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . cash flows millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 3234</td><td>$ 4070</td><td>$ 3277</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2175 ( 2175 )</td><td>-2764 ( 2764 )</td><td>-2426 ( 2426 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-458 ( 458 )</td><td>-935 ( 935 )</td><td>-800 ( 800 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 601</td><td>$ 371</td><td>$ 51</td></tr></table> operating activities lower net income in 2009 , a reduction of $ 184 million in the outstanding balance of our accounts receivable securitization program , higher pension contributions of $ 72 million , and changes to working capital combined to decrease cash provided by operating activities compared to 2008 . higher net income and changes in working capital combined to increase cash provided by operating activities in 2008 compared to 2007 . in addition , accelerated tax deductions enacted in 2008 on certain new operating assets resulted in lower income tax payments in 2008 versus 2007 . voluntary pension contributions in 2008 totaling $ 200 million and other pension contributions of $ 8 million partially offset the year-over-year increase versus 2007 . investing activities lower capital investments and higher proceeds from asset sales drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities in 2009 versus 2008 . increased capital investments and lower proceeds from asset sales drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2008 compared to 2007. .\nQuestion: what was the net change in cash provided by operating activities from 2008 to 2009?\nAnswer: -836.0\nQuestion: what is that change divided by the 2008 value?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-0.20541"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10011
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n36 duke realty corporation annual report 2013 leasing/capital costs tenant improvements and lease-related costs pertaining to our initial leasing of newly completed space , or vacant space in acquired properties , are referred to as first generation expenditures . such first generation expenditures for tenant improvements are included within \"development of real estate investments\" in our consolidated statements of cash flows , while such expenditures for lease-related costs are included within \"other deferred leasing costs.\" cash expenditures related to the construction of a building's shell , as well as the associated site improvements , are also included within \"development of real estate investments\" in our consolidated statements of cash flows . tenant improvements and leasing costs to re-let rental space that we previously leased to tenants are referred to as second generation expenditures . building improvements that are not specific to any tenant but serve to improve integral components of our real estate properties are also second generation expenditures . one of our principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the second generation leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following table summarizes our second generation capital expenditures by type of expenditure ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>second generation tenant improvements</td><td>$ 39892</td><td>$ 26643</td><td>$ 50079</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>second generation leasing costs</td><td>38617</td><td>31059</td><td>38130</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>building improvements</td><td>13289</td><td>6182</td><td>11055</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total second generation capital expenditures</td><td>$ 91798</td><td>$ 63884</td><td>$ 99264</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>development of real estate investments</td><td>$ 427355</td><td>$ 264755</td><td>$ 162070</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other deferred leasing costs</td><td>$ 35376</td><td>$ 27772</td><td>$ 26311</td></tr></table> second generation tenant improvements and leasing costs increased due to a shift in industrial leasing volume from renewal leases to second generation leases ( see data in the key performance indicators section of management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ) , which are generally more capital intensive . additionally , although the overall renewal volume was lower , renewals for office leases , which are generally more capital intensive than industrial leases , increased from 2012 . during 2013 , we increased our investment across all product types in non-tenant specific building improvements . the increase in capital expenditures for the development of real estate investments was the result of our increased focus on wholly owned development projects . we had wholly owned properties under development with an expected cost of $ 572.6 million at december 31 , 2013 , compared to projects with an expected cost of $ 468.8 million and $ 124.2 million at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . cash outflows for real estate development investments were $ 427.4 million , $ 264.8 million and $ 162.1 million for december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . we capitalized $ 31.3 million , $ 30.4 million and $ 25.3 million of overhead costs related to leasing activities , including both first and second generation leases , during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . we capitalized $ 27.1 million , $ 20.0 million and $ 10.4 million of overhead costs related to development activities , including construction , development and tenant improvement projects on first and second generation space , during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . combined overhead costs capitalized to leasing and development totaled 35.7% ( 35.7 % ) , 31.1% ( 31.1 % ) and 20.6% ( 20.6 % ) of our overall pool of overhead costs at december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . further discussion of the capitalization of overhead costs can be found herein , in the discussion of general and administrative expenses in the comparison sections of management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. .\nQuestion: what is the change in second generation tenant improvements from 2012 to 2013?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "13249.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1408
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 11 2013 stock-based compensation during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we recorded non-cash stock-based compensation expense totaling $ 164 million , $ 189 million and $ 167 million , which is included as a component of other unallocated , net on our statements of earnings . the net impact to earnings for the respective years was $ 107 million , $ 122 million and $ 108 million . as of december 31 , 2014 , we had $ 91 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years . we received cash from the exercise of stock options totaling $ 308 million , $ 827 million and $ 440 million during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 . in addition , our income tax liabilities for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were reduced by $ 215 million , $ 158 million , $ 96 million due to recognized tax benefits on stock-based compensation arrangements . stock-based compensation plans under plans approved by our stockholders , we are authorized to grant key employees stock-based incentive awards , including options to purchase common stock , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) or other stock units . the exercise price of options to purchase common stock may not be less than the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant . no award of stock options may become fully vested prior to the third anniversary of the grant and no portion of a stock option grant may become vested in less than one year . the minimum vesting period for restricted stock or stock units payable in stock is three years . award agreements may provide for shorter or pro-rated vesting periods or vesting following termination of employment in the case of death , disability , divestiture , retirement , change of control or layoff . the maximum term of a stock option or any other award is 10 years . at december 31 , 2014 , inclusive of the shares reserved for outstanding stock options , rsus and psus , we had 19 million shares reserved for issuance under the plans . at december 31 , 2014 , 7.8 million of the shares reserved for issuance remained available for grant under our stock-based compensation plans . we issue new shares upon the exercise of stock options or when restrictions on rsus and psus have been satisfied . the following table summarizes activity related to nonvested rsus during 2014 : number of rsus ( in thousands ) weighted average grant-date fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of rsus ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted average grant-date fair value pershare</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2011</td><td>4302</td><td>$ 78.25</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>1987</td><td>81.93</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-1299 ( 1299 )</td><td>80.64</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-168 ( 168 )</td><td>79.03</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2012</td><td>4822</td><td>$ 79.10</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>1356</td><td>89.24</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested</td><td>-2093 ( 2093 )</td><td>79.26</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-226 ( 226 )</td><td>81.74</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2013</td><td>3859</td><td>$ 82.42</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>granted</td><td>745</td><td>146.85</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>vested</td><td>-2194 ( 2194 )</td><td>87.66</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-84 ( 84 )</td><td>91.11</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2014</td><td>2326</td><td>$ 97.80</td></tr></table> rsus are valued based on the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant . employees who are granted rsus receive the right to receive shares of stock after completion of the vesting period ; however , the shares are not issued and the employees cannot sell or transfer shares prior to vesting and have no voting rights until the rsus vest , generally three years from the date of the award . employees who are granted rsus receive dividend-equivalent cash payments only upon vesting . for these rsu awards , the grant-date fair value is equal to the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant less a discount to reflect the delay in payment of dividend-equivalent cash payments . we recognize the grant-date fair value of rsus , less estimated forfeitures , as compensation expense ratably over the requisite service period , which beginning with the rsus granted in 2013 is shorter than the vesting period if the employee is retirement eligible on the date of grant or will become retirement eligible before the end of the vesting period. .\nQuestion: what is the non-cash stock-based compensation expense in 2013?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "189.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA11035
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndomestic utility companies and system energy notes to respective financial statements derived from another portion of the entity that continues to apply sfas 71 should not be written off ; rather , they should be considered regulatory assets of the segment that will continue to apply sfas 71 . see note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for discussion of transition to competition activity in the retail regulatory jurisdictions served by the domestic utility companies . only texas currently has an enacted retail open access law , but entergy believes that significant issues remain to be addressed by regulators , and the enacted law does not provide sufficient detail to reasonably determine the impact on entergy gulf states' regulated operations . cash and cash equivalents entergy considers all unrestricted highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents . investments with original maturities of more than three months are classified as other temporary investments on the balance sheet . investments entergy applies the provisions of sfas 115 , 201caccounting for investments for certain debt and equity securities , 201d in accounting for investments in decommissioning trust funds . as a result , entergy records the decommissioning trust funds at their fair value on the balance sheet . as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , the fair value of the securities held in such funds differs from the amounts deposited plus the earnings on the deposits by the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>entergy arkansas</td><td>$ 35.3</td><td>$ 69.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>entergy gulf states</td><td>$ 1.4</td><td>$ 18.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>entergy louisiana</td><td>( $ 0.3 )</td><td>$ 8.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>system energy</td><td>( $ 14.5 )</td><td>( $ 1.6 )</td></tr></table> in accordance with the regulatory treatment for decommissioning trust funds , entergy arkansas , entergy gulf states ( for the regulated portion of river bend ) , and entergy louisiana have recorded an offsetting amount of unrealized gains/ ( losses ) on investment securities in accumulated depreciation . for the nonregulated portion of river bend , entergy gulf states has recorded an offsetting amount of unrealized gains/ ( losses ) in other deferred credits . system energy's offsetting amount of unrealized gains/ ( losses ) on investment securities is in other regulatory liabilities . derivatives and hedging entergy implemented sfas 133 , 201caccounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities 201d on january 1 , 2001 . the statement requires that all derivatives be recognized in the balance sheet , either as assets or liabilities , at fair value . the changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in current earnings or other comprehensive income , depending on whether a derivative is designated as part of a hedge transaction and , if it is , the type of hedge transaction . for cash-flow hedge transactions in which entergy is hedging the variability of cash flows related to a variable-rate asset , liability , or forecasted transaction , changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument are reported in other comprehensive income . the gains and losses on the derivative instrument that are reported in other comprehensive income are reclassified as earnings in the periods in which earnings are impacted by the variability of the cash flows of the hedged item . the ineffective portions of all hedges are recognized in current- period earnings . contracts for commodities that will be delivered in quantities expected to be used or sold in the ordinary course of business , including certain purchases and sales of power and fuel , are not classified as derivatives. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in the fair value of the securities held in decommissioning trust funds and the amounts deposited plus the earnings on the deposits from 2001 to 2002 for entergy arkansas?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "34.5"
}
] |
CONVFINQA5635
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe graph below compares expeditors international of washington , inc.'s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq transportation index , and the nasdaq industrial transportation index ( nqusb2770t ) as a replacement for the nasdaq transportation index . the company is making the modification to reference a specific transportation index and to source that data directly from nasdaq . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on 12/31/2012 and tracks it through 12/31/2017 . total return assumes reinvestment of dividends in each of the indices indicated . comparison of 5-year cumulative total return among expeditors international of washington , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq industrial transportation index and the nasdaq transportation index. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/12</td><td>12/13</td><td>12/14</td><td>12/15</td><td>12/16</td><td>12/17</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expeditors international of washington inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 113.52</td><td>$ 116.07</td><td>$ 119.12</td><td>$ 142.10</td><td>$ 176.08</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard and poor's 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>132.39</td><td>150.51</td><td>152.59</td><td>170.84</td><td>208.14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq transportation</td><td>100.00</td><td>133.76</td><td>187.65</td><td>162.30</td><td>193.79</td><td>248.92</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t )</td><td>100.00</td><td>141.60</td><td>171.91</td><td>132.47</td><td>171.17</td><td>218.34</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . item 6 2014 selected financial data financial highlights in thousands , except per share data 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 revenues ..................................................................... . $ 6920948 6098037 6616632 6564721 6080257 net revenues1 ............................................................... . $ 2319189 2164036 2187777 1981427 1882853 net earnings attributable to shareholders ..................... . $ 489345 430807 457223 376888 348526 diluted earnings attributable to shareholders per share $ 2.69 2.36 2.40 1.92 1.68 basic earnings attributable to shareholders per share.. . $ 2.73 2.38 2.42 1.92 1.69 dividends declared and paid per common share.......... . $ 0.84 0.80 0.72 0.64 0.60 cash used for dividends ............................................... . $ 150495 145123 135673 124634 123292 cash used for share repurchases ................................. . $ 478258 337658 629991 550781 261936 working capital ............................................................. . $ 1448333 1288648 1115136 1285188 1526673 total assets .................................................................. . $ 3117008 2790871 2565577 2870626 2996416 shareholders 2019 equity ..................................................... . $ 1991858 1844638 1691993 1868408 2084783 weighted average diluted shares outstanding .............. . 181666 182704 190223 196768 206895 weighted average basic shares outstanding ................ . 179247 181282 188941 196147 205995 _______________________ 1non-gaap measure calculated as revenues less directly related operating expenses attributable to our principal services . see management's discussion and analysis for a reconciliation of net revenues to revenues . safe harbor for forward-looking statements under private securities litigation reform act of 1995 ; certain cautionary statements this annual report on form 10-k for the fiscal year ended december 31 , 2017 contains 201cforward-looking statements , 201d as defined in section 27a of the securities act of 1933 , as amended , and section 21e of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended . from time to time , expeditors or its representatives have made or may make forward-looking statements , orally or in writing . such forward-looking statements may be included in , but not limited to , press releases , presentations , oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer or in various filings made by expeditors with the securities and exchange commission . statements including those preceded by , followed by or that include the words or phrases 201cwill likely result 201d , 201care expected to 201d , \"would expect\" , \"would not expect\" , 201cwill continue 201d , 201cis anticipated 201d , 201cestimate 201d , 201cproject 201d , \"provisional\" , \"plan\" , \"believe\" , \"probable\" , \"reasonably possible\" , \"may\" , \"could\" , \"should\" , \"intends\" , \"foreseeable future\" or similar expressions are intended to identify 201cforward-looking statements 201d within the meaning of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 . such statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to and are accompanied by the discussion in item 1a of certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements . the risks included in item 1a are not exhaustive . furthermore , reference is also made to other sections of this report , which include additional factors that could adversely impact expeditors' business and financial performance . moreover , expeditors operates in a very competitive , complex and rapidly changing global environment . new risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all of such risk factors , nor can it assess the impact of all of such risk factors on expeditors' business or the extent to which any factor , or combination of factors , may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements . accordingly , forward-looking statements cannot be relied upon as a guarantee of actual results . shareholders should be aware that while expeditors does , from time to time , communicate with securities analysts , it is against expeditors' policy to disclose to such analysts any material non-public information or other confidential commercial information . accordingly , shareholders should not assume that expeditors agrees with any statement or report issued by any analyst irrespective of the content of such statement or report . furthermore , expeditors has a policy against issuing financial forecasts or projections or confirming the accuracy of forecasts or projections issued by others . accordingly , to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections , forecasts or opinions , such reports are not the responsibility of expeditors. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the value of the expeditors international of washington inc . from 2012 to 2017?\nAnswer: 76.08\nQuestion: and what was that change for standard and poor's 500 index during the same period?\nAnswer: 108.14\nQuestion: how much does the expeditors international of washington inc . change represent in relation to the the value of that stock in 2012, in percentage?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.7608"
}
] |
CONVFINQA5929
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\naeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , c-130 hercules , f-16 fighting falcon , c-5m super galaxy and f-22 raptor . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 15570</td><td>$ 14920</td><td>$ 14123</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1681</td><td>1649</td><td>1612</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>11.4% ( 11.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>$ 31800</td><td>$ 27600</td><td>$ 28000</td></tr></table> 2015 compared to 2014 aeronautics 2019 net sales in 2015 increased $ 650 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2014 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 1.4 billion for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities ; and approximately $ 150 million for the c-5 program due to increased deliveries ( nine aircraft delivered in 2015 compared to seven delivered in 2014 ) . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 350 million for the c-130 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries ( 21 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 24 delivered in 2014 ) , lower sustainment activities and aircraft contract mix ; approximately $ 200 million due to decreased volume and lower risk retirements on various programs ; approximately $ 195 million for the f-16 program due to fewer deliveries ( 11 aircraft delivered in 2015 , compared to 17 delivered in 2014 ) ; and approximately $ 190 million for the f-22 program as a result of decreased sustainment activities . aeronautics 2019 operating profit in 2015 increased $ 32 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2014 . operating profit increased by approximately $ 240 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and risk retirements ; and approximately $ 40 million for the c-5 program due to increased risk retirements . these increases were offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 90 million for the f-22 program due to lower risk retirements ; approximately $ 70 million for the c-130 program as a result of the reasons stated above for lower net sales ; and approximately $ 80 million due to decreased volume and risk retirements on various programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 100 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . 2014 compared to 2013 aeronautics 2019 net sales increased $ 797 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 790 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume and sustainment activities ; about $ 55 million for the f-16 program due to increased deliveries ( 17 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 13 delivered in 2013 ) partially offset by contract mix ; and approximately $ 45 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements . the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 55 million for the f-35 development contract due to decreased volume , partially offset by the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; and about $ 40 million for the c-130 program due to fewer deliveries ( 24 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 25 delivered in 2013 ) and decreased sustainment activities , partially offset by contract mix . aeronautics 2019 operating profit increased $ 37 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 . the increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 85 million for the f-35 development contract due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 ; about $ 75 million for the f-22 program due to increased risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million for the c-130 program due to increased risk retirements and contract mix , partially offset by fewer deliveries ; and about $ 25 million for the c-5 program due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revisions to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013 . the increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 130 million for the f-16 program due to decreased risk retirements , partially offset by increased deliveries ; and about $ 70 million for sustainment activities due to decreased risk retirements and volume . operating profit was comparable for f-35 production contracts as higher volume was offset by lower risk retirements . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 105 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013. .\nQuestion: what was the operating profit in 2015?\nAnswer: 1681.0\nQuestion: what was the operating profit in 2014?\nAnswer: 1649.0\nQuestion: what is the sum for 2014 and 2015?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "3330.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6236
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nsystem energy may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common stock issuances by system energy require prior regulatory approval . a0 a0debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . a0 a0system energy has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 111667</td><td>$ 33809</td><td>$ 39926</td><td>$ 2373</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 120 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 17.8 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $ 50 million in loans were outstanding under the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the variable interest entity credit facility . system energy obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2019 for the following : 2022 short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 200 million at any time outstanding ; 2022 long-term borrowings and security issuances ; and 2022 long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of system energy 2019s short-term borrowing limits . system energy resources , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis federal regulation see the 201crate , cost-recovery , and other regulation 2013 federal regulation 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of federal regulation . complaint against system energy in january 2017 the apsc and mpsc filed a complaint with the ferc against system energy . the complaint seeks a reduction in the return on equity component of the unit power sales agreement pursuant to which system energy sells its grand gulf capacity and energy to entergy arkansas , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , and entergy new orleans . entergy arkansas also sells some of its grand gulf capacity and energy to entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , and entergy new orleans under separate agreements . the current return on equity under the unit power sales agreement is 10.94% ( 10.94 % ) . the complaint alleges that the return on equity is unjust and unreasonable because current capital market and other considerations indicate that it is excessive . the complaint requests the ferc to institute proceedings to investigate the return on equity and establish a lower return on equity , and also requests that the ferc establish january 23 , 2017 as a refund effective date . the complaint includes return on equity analysis that purports to establish that the range of reasonable return on equity for system energy is between 8.37% ( 8.37 % ) and 8.67% ( 8.67 % ) . system energy answered the complaint in february 2017 and disputes that a return on equity of 8.37% ( 8.37 % ) to 8.67% ( 8.67 % ) is just and reasonable . the lpsc and the city council intervened in the proceeding expressing support for the complaint . system energy is recording a provision against revenue for the potential outcome of this proceeding . in september 2017 the ferc established a refund effective date of january 23 , 2017 , consolidated the return on equity complaint with the proceeding described in unit power sales agreement below , and directed the parties to engage in settlement .\nQuestion: what is the balance of system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool in 2017?\nAnswer: 111667.0\nQuestion: what about in 2016?\nAnswer: 2373.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "109294.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA737
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis investing & lending investing & lending includes our investing activities and the origination of loans , including our relationship lending activities , to provide financing to clients . these investments and loans are typically longer-term in nature . we make investments , some of which are consolidated , including through our merchant banking business and our special situations group , in debt securities and loans , public and private equity securities , infrastructure and real estate entities . some of these investments are made indirectly through funds that we manage . we also make unsecured and secured loans to retail clients through our digital platforms , marcus and goldman sachs private bank select ( gs select ) , respectively . the table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>year ended december 2017</td><td>year ended december 2016</td><td>year ended december 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity securities</td><td>$ 4578</td><td>$ 2573</td><td>$ 3781</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt securities and loans</td><td>2003</td><td>1507</td><td>1655</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total net revenues</td><td>6581</td><td>4080</td><td>5436</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating expenses</td><td>2796</td><td>2386</td><td>2402</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pre-taxearnings</td><td>$ 3785</td><td>$ 1694</td><td>$ 3034</td></tr></table> operating environment . during 2017 , generally higher global equity prices and tighter credit spreads contributed to a favorable environment for our equity and debt investments . results also reflected net gains from company- specific events , including sales , and corporate performance . this environment contrasts with 2016 , where , in the first quarter of 2016 , market conditions were difficult and corporate performance , particularly in the energy sector , was impacted by a challenging macroeconomic environment . however , market conditions improved during the rest of 2016 as macroeconomic concerns moderated . if macroeconomic concerns negatively affect company-specific events or corporate performance , or if global equity markets decline or credit spreads widen , net revenues in investing & lending would likely be negatively impacted . 2017 versus 2016 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 6.58 billion for 2017 , 61% ( 61 % ) higher than 2016 . net revenues in equity securities were $ 4.58 billion , including $ 3.82 billion of net gains from private equities and $ 762 million in net gains from public equities . net revenues in equity securities were 78% ( 78 % ) higher than 2016 , primarily reflecting a significant increase in net gains from private equities , which were positively impacted by company- specific events and corporate performance . in addition , net gains from public equities were significantly higher , as global equity prices increased during the year . of the $ 4.58 billion of net revenues in equity securities , approximately 60% ( 60 % ) was driven by net gains from company-specific events , such as sales , and public equities . net revenues in debt securities and loans were $ 2.00 billion , 33% ( 33 % ) higher than 2016 , reflecting significantly higher net interest income ( 2017 included approximately $ 1.80 billion of net interest income ) . net revenues in debt securities and loans for 2017 also included an impairment of approximately $ 130 million on a secured operating expenses were $ 2.80 billion for 2017 , 17% ( 17 % ) higher than 2016 , due to increased compensation and benefits expenses , reflecting higher net revenues , increased expenses related to consolidated investments , and increased expenses related to marcus . pre-tax earnings were $ 3.79 billion in 2017 compared with $ 1.69 billion in 2016 . 2016 versus 2015 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 4.08 billion for 2016 , 25% ( 25 % ) lower than 2015 . net revenues in equity securities were $ 2.57 billion , including $ 2.17 billion of net gains from private equities and $ 402 million in net gains from public equities . net revenues in equity securities were 32% ( 32 % ) lower than 2015 , primarily reflecting a significant decrease in net gains from private equities , driven by company-specific events and corporate performance . net revenues in debt securities and loans were $ 1.51 billion , 9% ( 9 % ) lower than 2015 , reflecting significantly lower net revenues related to relationship lending activities , due to the impact of changes in credit spreads on economic hedges . losses related to these hedges were $ 596 million in 2016 , compared with gains of $ 329 million in 2015 . this decrease was partially offset by higher net gains from investments in debt instruments and higher net interest income . see note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about economic hedges related to our relationship lending activities . operating expenses were $ 2.39 billion for 2016 , essentially unchanged compared with 2015 . pre-tax earnings were $ 1.69 billion in 2016 , 44% ( 44 % ) lower than 2015 . goldman sachs 2017 form 10-k 61 .\nQuestion: in 2017, what were the net revenues in equity securities when including net gains from private equities?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "8.4"
}
] |
CONVFINQA7007
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe table below summarizes activity of rsus with performance conditions for the year ended december 31 , shares ( in thousands ) weighted average grant date fair value ( per share ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares ( in thousands )</td><td>weightedaverage grantdate fair value ( per share )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-vested total as of december 31 2016</td><td>309</td><td>$ 55.94</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>186</td><td>63.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-204 ( 204 )</td><td>46.10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>70.50</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-vested total as of december 31 2017</td><td>281</td><td>$ 67.33</td></tr></table> as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested rsus , with and without performance conditions , is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.5 years . the total fair value of rsus , with and without performance conditions , vested was $ 16 million , $ 14 million and $ 12 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . if dividends are paid with respect to shares of the company 2019s common stock before the rsus are distributed , the company credits a liability for the value of the dividends that would have been paid if the rsus were shares of company common stock . when the rsus are distributed , the company pays the participant a lump sum cash payment equal to the value of the dividend equivalents accrued . the company accrued dividend equivalents totaling less than $ 1 million , $ 1 million and $ 1 million to accumulated deficit in the accompanying consolidated statements of changes in stockholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . employee stock purchase plan the company maintains a nonqualified employee stock purchase plan ( the 201cespp 201d ) through which employee participants may use payroll deductions to acquire company common stock at the lesser of 90% ( 90 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock at either the beginning or the end of a three-month purchase period . on february 15 , 2017 , the board adopted the american water works company , inc . and its designated subsidiaries 2017 nonqualified employee stock purchase plan , which was approved by stockholders on may 12 , 2017 and took effect on august 5 , 2017 . the prior plan was terminated as to new purchases of company stock effective august 31 , 2017 . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were 2.0 million shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the espp . the espp is considered compensatory . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , the company issued 93 thousand , 93 thousand and 98 thousand shares , respectively , under the espp. .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2017, what was the total number of non-vested shares?\nAnswer: 281.0\nQuestion: and what percentage of this number was due to forfeited ones?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.03559"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1621
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmarathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( f ) this sale-leaseback financing arrangement relates to a lease of a slab caster at united states steel 2019s fairfield works facility in alabama . we are the primary obligor under this lease . under the financial matters agreement , united states steel has assumed responsibility for all obligations under this lease . this lease is an amortizing financing with a final maturity of 2012 , subject to additional extensions . ( g ) this obligation relates to a lease of equipment at united states steel 2019s clairton works cokemaking facility in pennsylvania . we are the primary obligor under this lease . under the financial matters agreement , united states steel has assumed responsibility for all obligations under this lease . this lease is an amortizing financing with a final maturity of 2012 . ( h ) marathon oil canada corporation had an 805 million canadian dollar revolving term credit facility which was secured by substantially all of marathon oil canada corporation 2019s assets and included certain financial covenants , including leverage and interest coverage ratios . in february 2008 , the outstanding balance was repaid and the facility was terminated . ( i ) these notes are senior secured notes of marathon oil canada corporation . the notes were secured by substantially all of marathon oil canada corporation 2019s assets . in january 2008 , we provided a full and unconditional guarantee covering the payment of all principal and interest due under the senior notes . ( j ) these obligations as of december 31 , 2008 include $ 126 million related to assets under construction at that date for which capital leases or sale-leaseback financings will commence upon completion of construction . the amounts currently reported are based upon the percent of construction completed as of december 31 , 2008 and therefore do not reflect future minimum lease obligations of $ 209 million . ( k ) payments of long-term debt for the years 2009 2013 2013 are $ 99 million , $ 98 million , $ 257 million , $ 1487 million and $ 279 million . of these amounts , payments assumed by united states steel are $ 15 million , $ 17 million , $ 161 million , $ 19 million and zero . ( l ) in the event of a change in control , as defined in the related agreements , debt obligations totaling $ 669 million at december 31 , 2008 , may be declared immediately due and payable . ( m ) see note 17 for information on interest rate swaps . on february 17 , 2009 , we issued $ 700 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes bearing interest at 6.5 percent with a maturity date of february 15 , 2014 and $ 800 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes bearing interest at 7.5 percent with a maturity date of february 15 , 2019 . interest on both issues is payable semi- annually beginning august 15 , 2009 . 21 . asset retirement obligations the following summarizes the changes in asset retirement obligations : ( in millions ) 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>asset retirement obligations as of january 1</td><td>$ 1134</td><td>$ 1044</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liabilities incurred including acquisitions</td><td>30</td><td>60</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>liabilities settled</td><td>-94 ( 94 )</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accretion expense ( included in depreciation depletion and amortization )</td><td>66</td><td>61</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>revisions to previous estimates</td><td>24</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>held for sale ( a )</td><td>-195 ( 195 )</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>deconsolidation of egholdings</td><td>2013</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>asset retirement obligations as of december 31 ( b )</td><td>$ 965</td><td>$ 1134</td></tr></table> asset retirement obligations as of december 31 ( b ) $ 965 $ 1134 ( a ) see note 7 for information related to our assets held for sale . ( b ) includes asset retirement obligation of $ 2 and $ 3 million classified as short-term at december 31 , 2008 , and 2007. .\nQuestion: what was the total of asset retirement obligations in 2008?\nAnswer: 965.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2007?\nAnswer: 1134.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-169.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8684
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nwe realize synergies from consolidating businesses into our existing operations , whether through acquisitions or public-private partnerships , which allow us to reduce capital and expense requirements associated with truck routing , personnel , fleet maintenance , inventories and back-office administration . operating model the goal of our operating model pillar is to deliver a consistent , high quality service to all of our customers through the republic way : one way . everywhere . every day . this approach of developing standardized processes with rigorous controls and tracking allows us to leverage our scale and deliver durable operational excellence . the republic way is the key to harnessing the best of what we do as operators and translating that across all facets of our business . a key enabler of the republic way is our organizational structure that fosters a high performance culture by maintaining 360 degree accountability and full profit and loss responsibility with general management , supported by a functional structure to provide subject matter expertise . this structure allows us to take advantage of our scale by coordinating functionally across all of our markets , while empowering local management to respond to unique market dynamics . we have rolled out several productivity and cost control initiatives designed to deliver the best service possible to our customers in the most efficient and environmentally sound way . fleet automation approximately 72% ( 72 % ) of our residential routes have been converted to automated single driver trucks . by converting our residential routes to automated service , we reduce labor costs , improve driver productivity , decrease emissions and create a safer work environment for our employees . additionally , communities using automated vehicles have higher participation rates in recycling programs , thereby complementing our initiative to expand our recycling capabilities . fleet conversion to compressed natural gas ( cng ) approximately 16% ( 16 % ) of our fleet operates on cng . we expect to continue our gradual fleet conversion to cng , our preferred alternative fuel technology , as part of our ordinary annual fleet replacement process . we believe a gradual fleet conversion is most prudent to realize the full value of our previous fleet investments . approximately 33% ( 33 % ) of our replacement vehicle purchases during 2015 were cng vehicles . we believe using cng vehicles provides us a competitive advantage in communities with strict clean emission initiatives that focus on protecting the environment . although upfront costs are higher , using cng reduces our overall fleet operating costs through lower fuel expenses . as of december 31 , 2015 , we operated 38 cng fueling stations . standardized maintenance based on an industry trade publication , we operate the ninth largest vocational fleet in the united states . as of december 31 , 2015 , our average fleet age in years , by line of business , was as follows : approximate number of vehicles approximate average age . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>approximate number of vehicles</td><td>approximate average age</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>residential</td><td>7200</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>small-container commercial</td><td>4400</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>large-container industrial</td><td>4000</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>15600</td><td>7.5</td></tr></table> onefleet , our standardized vehicle maintenance program , enables us to use best practices for fleet management , truck care and maintenance . through standardization of core functions , we believe we can minimize variability .\nQuestion: what is the percentage of vehicles that have already been converted to natural gas?\nAnswer: 0.16\nQuestion: and what is the amount equivalent to this percentage?\nAnswer: 2496.0\nQuestion: and as of 2015, what was the total of vehicles for residential?\nAnswer: 7200.0\nQuestion: how much did this total represent in relation to the total of ones related to large-container industrial?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1.8"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4980
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nour refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is the difference between the prices of refined products sold and the costs of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks refined , including the costs to transport these inputs to our refineries , the costs of purchased products and manufacturing expenses , including depreciation . the crack spread is a measure of the difference between market prices for refined products and crude oil , commonly used by the industry as an indicator of the impact of price on the refining margin . crack spreads can fluctuate significantly , particularly when prices of refined products do not move in the same relationship as the cost of crude oil . as a performance benchmark and a comparison with other industry participants , we calculate midwest ( chicago ) and u.s . gulf coast crack spreads that we feel most closely track our operations and slate of products . posted light louisiana sweet ( 201clls 201d ) prices and a 6-3-2-1 ratio of products ( 6 barrels of crude oil producing 3 barrels of gasoline , 2 barrels of distillate and 1 barrel of residual fuel ) are used for the crack spread calculation . the following table lists calculated average crack spreads by quarter for the midwest ( chicago ) and gulf coast markets in 2008 . crack spreads ( dollars per barrel ) 1st qtr 2nd qtr 3rd qtr 4th qtr 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>crack spreads ( dollars per barrel )</td><td>1st qtr</td><td>2nd qtr</td><td>3rd qtr</td><td>4th qtr</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>chicago lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 0.07</td><td>$ 2.71</td><td>$ 7.81</td><td>$ 2.31</td><td>$ 3.27</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>us gulf coast lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 1.39</td><td>$ 1.99</td><td>$ 6.32</td><td>( $ 0.01 )</td><td>$ 2.45</td></tr></table> in addition to the market changes indicated by the crack spreads , our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is impacted by factors such as the types of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks processed , the selling prices realized for refined products , the impact of commodity derivative instruments used to mitigate price risk and the cost of purchased products for resale . we process significant amounts of sour crude oil which can enhance our profitability compared to certain of our competitors , as sour crude oil typically can be purchased at a discount to sweet crude oil . finally , our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is impacted by changes in manufacturing costs , which are primarily driven by the level of maintenance activities at the refineries and the price of purchased natural gas used for plant fuel . our 2008 refining and wholesale marketing gross margin was the key driver of the 43 percent decrease in rm&t segment income when compared to 2007 . our average refining and wholesale marketing gross margin per gallon decreased 37 percent , to 11.66 cents in 2008 from 18.48 cents in 2007 , primarily due to the significant and rapid increases in crude oil prices early in 2008 and lagging wholesale price realizations . our retail marketing gross margin for gasoline and distillates , which is the difference between the ultimate price paid by consumers and the cost of refined products , including secondary transportation and consumer excise taxes , also impacts rm&t segment profitability . while on average demand has been increasing for several years , there are numerous factors including local competition , seasonal demand fluctuations , the available wholesale supply , the level of economic activity in our marketing areas and weather conditions that impact gasoline and distillate demand throughout the year . in 2008 , demand began to drop due to the combination of significant increases in retail petroleum prices and a broad slowdown in general activity . the gross margin on merchandise sold at retail outlets has historically been more constant . the profitability of our pipeline transportation operations is primarily dependent on the volumes shipped through our crude oil and refined products pipelines . the volume of crude oil that we transport is directly affected by the supply of , and refiner demand for , crude oil in the markets served directly by our crude oil pipelines . key factors in this supply and demand balance are the production levels of crude oil by producers , the availability and cost of alternative modes of transportation , and refinery and transportation system maintenance levels . the volume of refined products that we transport is directly affected by the production levels of , and user demand for , refined products in the markets served by our refined product pipelines . in most of our markets , demand for gasoline peaks during the summer and declines during the fall and winter months , whereas distillate demand is more ratable throughout the year . as with crude oil , other transportation alternatives and system maintenance levels influence refined product movements . integrated gas our integrated gas strategy is to link stranded natural gas resources with areas where a supply gap is emerging due to declining production and growing demand . our integrated gas operations include marketing and transportation of products manufactured from natural gas , such as lng and methanol , primarily in the u.s. , europe and west africa . our most significant lng investment is our 60 percent ownership in a production facility in equatorial guinea , which sells lng under a long-term contract at prices tied to henry hub natural gas prices . in 2008 , its .\nQuestion: what was the total combined crack spread for us gulf coast lls 6-3-2-1 in the first and second quarter of 2008?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "3.38"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1839
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 110 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report 2012 compared with 2011 net loss was $ 2.0 billion , compared with a net income of $ 919 million in the prior year . private equity reported net income of $ 292 million , compared with net income of $ 391 million in the prior year . net revenue was $ 601 million , compared with $ 836 million in the prior year , due to lower unrealized and realized gains on private investments , partially offset by higher unrealized gains on public securities . noninterest expense was $ 145 million , down from $ 238 million in the prior year . treasury and cio reported a net loss of $ 2.1 billion , compared with net income of $ 1.3 billion in the prior year . net revenue was a loss of $ 3.1 billion , compared with net revenue of $ 3.2 billion in the prior year . the current year loss reflected $ 5.8 billion of losses incurred by cio from the synthetic credit portfolio for the six months ended june 30 , 2012 , and $ 449 million of losses from the retained index credit derivative positions for the three months ended september 30 , 2012 . these losses were partially offset by securities gains of $ 2.0 billion . the current year revenue reflected $ 888 million of extinguishment gains related to the redemption of trust preferred securities , which are included in all other income in the above table . the extinguishment gains were related to adjustments applied to the cost basis of the trust preferred securities during the period they were in a qualified hedge accounting relationship . net interest income was negative $ 683 million , compared with $ 1.4 billion in the prior year , primarily reflecting the impact of lower portfolio yields and higher deposit balances across the firm . other corporate reported a net loss of $ 221 million , compared with a net loss of $ 821 million in the prior year . noninterest revenue of $ 1.8 billion was driven by a $ 1.1 billion benefit for the washington mutual bankruptcy settlement , which is included in all other income in the above table , and a $ 665 million gain from the recovery on a bear stearns-related subordinated loan . noninterest expense of $ 3.8 billion was up $ 1.0 billion compared with the prior year . the current year included expense of $ 3.7 billion for additional litigation reserves , largely for mortgage-related matters . the prior year included expense of $ 3.2 billion for additional litigation reserves . treasury and cio overview treasury and cio are predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding and structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks , as well as executing the firm 2019s capital plan . the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off-balance sheet assets and liabilities . cio achieves the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high-quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s afs and htm investment securities portfolios ( the 201cinvestment securities portfolio 201d ) . cio also uses derivatives , as well as securities that are not classified as afs or htm , to meet the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives . for further information on derivatives , see note 6 on pages 220 2013233 of this annual report . for further information about securities not classified within the afs or htm portfolio , see note 3 on pages 195 2013215 of this annual report . the treasury and cio investment securities portfolio primarily consists of u.s . and non-u.s . government securities , agency and non-agency mortgage-backed securities , other asset-backed securities , corporate debt securities and obligations of u.s . states and municipalities . at december 31 , 2013 , the total treasury and cio investment securities portfolio was $ 347.6 billion ; the average credit rating of the securities comprising the treasury and cio investment securities portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) . see note 12 on pages 249 2013254 of this annual report for further information on the details of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio . for further information on liquidity and funding risk , see liquidity risk management on pages 168 2013173 of this annual report . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , treasury and cio value-at-risk ( 201cvar 201d ) and the firm 2019s structural interest rate-sensitive revenue at risk , see market risk management on pages 142 2013148 of this annual report . selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2013 2012 2011 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>securities gains</td><td>$ 659</td><td>$ 2028</td><td>$ 1385</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( average )</td><td>353712</td><td>358029</td><td>330885</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) ( a )</td><td>347562</td><td>365421</td><td>355605</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>mortgage loans ( average )</td><td>5145</td><td>10241</td><td>13006</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>mortgage loans ( period-end )</td><td>3779</td><td>7037</td><td>13375</td></tr></table> ( a ) period-end investment securities included held-to-maturity balance of $ 24.0 billion at december 31 , 2013 . held-to-maturity balances for the other periods were not material. .\nQuestion: in the year of 2013, what what was the balance in the investment securities portfolio, in billions?\nAnswer: 347.562\nQuestion: and what would be that balance without the htm securities?\nAnswer: 323.562\nQuestion: and in the previous year, what was the total of litigation reserves?\nAnswer: 3.7\nQuestion: what was it in 2011?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "3.2"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1471
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance graph the following graph compares the total return , assuming reinvestment of dividends , on an investment in the company , based on performance of the company's common stock , with the total return of the standard & poor's 500 composite stock index and the dow jones united states travel and leisure index for a five year period by measuring the changes in common stock prices from december 31 , 2011 to december 31 , 2016. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/11</td><td>12/12</td><td>12/13</td><td>12/14</td><td>12/15</td><td>12/16</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>royal caribbean cruises ltd .</td><td>100.00</td><td>139.36</td><td>198.03</td><td>350.40</td><td>437.09</td><td>362.38</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>116.00</td><td>153.58</td><td>174.60</td><td>177.01</td><td>198.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones us travel & leisure</td><td>100.00</td><td>113.33</td><td>164.87</td><td>191.85</td><td>203.17</td><td>218.56</td></tr></table> the stock performance graph assumes for comparison that the value of the company's common stock and of each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 and that all dividends were reinvested . past performance is not necessarily an indicator of future results. .\nQuestion: what was the value of the royal caribbean cruises ltd . in 2013?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "198.03"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6591
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmajority of the increased tax position is attributable to temporary differences . the increase in 2014 current period tax positions related primarily to the company 2019s change in tax accounting method filed in 2008 for repair and maintenance costs on its utility plant . the company does not anticipate material changes to its unrecognized tax benefits within the next year . if the company sustains all of its positions at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , an unrecognized tax benefit of $ 9444 and $ 7439 , respectively , excluding interest and penalties , would impact the company 2019s effective tax rate . the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s valuation allowance: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at january 1 2012</td><td>$ 21579</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-2059 ( 2059 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance at december 31 2012</td><td>$ 19520</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-5965 ( 5965 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31 2013</td><td>$ 13555</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>increases in current period tax positions</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>decreases in current period tax positions</td><td>-3176 ( 3176 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at december 31 2014</td><td>$ 10379</td></tr></table> included in 2013 is a discrete tax benefit totaling $ 2979 associated with an entity re-organization within the company 2019s market-based operations segment that allowed for the utilization of state net operating loss carryforwards and the release of an associated valuation allowance . note 13 : employee benefits pension and other postretirement benefits the company maintains noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees of its regulated utility and shared services operations . benefits under the plans are based on the employee 2019s years of service and compensation . the pension plans have been closed for all employees . the pension plans were closed for most employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 had their accrued benefit frozen and will be able to receive this benefit as a lump sum upon termination or retirement . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 and non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 are provided with a 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) of base pay defined contribution plan . the company does not participate in a multiemployer plan . the company 2019s pension funding practice is to contribute at least the greater of the minimum amount required by the employee retirement income security act of 1974 or the normal cost . further , the company will consider additional contributions if needed to avoid 201cat risk 201d status and benefit restrictions under the pension protection act of 2006 . the company may also consider increased contributions , based on other financial requirements and the plans 2019 funded position . pension plan assets are invested in a number of actively managed and commingled funds including equity and bond funds , fixed income securities , guaranteed interest contracts with insurance companies , real estate funds and real estate investment trusts ( 201creits 201d ) . pension expense in excess of the amount contributed to the pension plans is deferred by certain regulated subsidiaries pending future recovery in rates charged for utility services as contributions are made to the plans . ( see note 6 ) the company also has unfunded noncontributory supplemental non-qualified pension plans that provide additional retirement benefits to certain employees. .\nQuestion: what was the decrease in tax positions in 2012?\nAnswer: 2059.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2013?\nAnswer: 5965.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the total decrease in tax positions in both years, combined?\nAnswer: 8024.0\nQuestion: including the decrease in tax positions in 2011, what then becomes this total?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "11200.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4750
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) failure of the company to develop new products and product enhancements on a timely basis or within budget could harm the company 2019s results of operations and financial condition . for additional risks that may affect the company 2019s business and prospects following completion of the merger , see 201crisk factors 201d in item 1a of the company 2019s form 10-k for the year ended september 29 , 2007 . goodwill the preliminary purchase price allocation has resulted in goodwill of approximately $ 3895100 . the factors contributing to the recognition of this amount of goodwill are based upon several strategic and synergistic benefits that are expected to be realized from the combination . these benefits include the expectation that the company 2019s complementary products and technologies will create a leading women 2019s healthcare company with an enhanced presence in hospitals , private practices and healthcare organizations . the company also expects to realize substantial synergies through the use of cytyc 2019s ob/gyn and breast surgeon sales channel to cross-sell the company 2019s existing and future products . the merger provides the company broader channel coverage within the united states and expanded geographic reach internationally , as well as increased scale and scope for further expanding operations through product development and complementary strategic transactions . supplemental unaudited pro-forma information the following unaudited pro forma information presents the consolidated results of operations of the company and cytyc as if the acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of fiscal 2007 , with pro forma adjustments to give effect to amortization of intangible assets , an increase in interest expense on acquisition financing and certain other adjustments together with related tax effects: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( approximate amounts in thousands except per share data )</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net revenue</td><td>$ 1472400</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 62600</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income per share 2014basic</td><td>$ 0.52</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net income per share 2014assuming dilution</td><td>$ 0.50</td></tr></table> the $ 368200 charge for acquired in-process research and development that was a direct result of the transaction is excluded from the unaudited pro forma information above . the unaudited pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the results that the company would have attained had the acquisitions of cytyc occurred at the beginning of the periods presented . prior to the close of the merger the board of directors of both hologic and cytyc approved a modification to certain outstanding equity awards for cytyc employees . the modification provided for the acceleration of vesting upon the close of merger for those awards that did not provide for acceleration upon a change of control as part of the original terms of the award . this modification was made so that the company will not incur stock based compensation charges that it otherwise would have if the awards had continued to vest under their original terms . credit agreement on october 22 , 2007 , company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries , entered into a senior secured credit agreement with goldman sachs credit partners l.p . and certain other lenders , ( collectively , the 201clenders 201d ) . pursuant to the terms and conditions of the credit agreement , the lenders have committed to provide senior secured financing in an aggregate amount of up to $ 2550000 . as of the closing of the cytyc merger , the company borrowed $ 2350000 under the credit facilities. .\nQuestion: considering the acquisitions of the company and cytyc at the beginning of fiscal 2007, how much did the net income represent in relation to the net revenue in that year?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.04252"
}
] |
CONVFINQA5283
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nsources and uses of cash ( in millions ) in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows : years ended ( in millions ) dec 29 , dec 30 , dec 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended ( in millions )</td><td>dec 292018</td><td>dec 302017</td><td>dec 312016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 29432</td><td>$ 22110</td><td>$ 21808</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-11239 ( 11239 )</td><td>-15762 ( 15762 )</td><td>-25817 ( 25817 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities</td><td>-18607 ( 18607 )</td><td>-8475 ( 8475 )</td><td>-5739 ( 5739 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -414 ( 414 )</td><td>$ -2127 ( 2127 )</td><td>$ -9748 ( 9748 )</td></tr></table> md&a consolidated results and analysis 40 .\nQuestion: what was the change in net cash provided by operating activities between 2016 and 2017?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "302.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA9329
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents the following performance graph is not 201csoliciting material , 201d is not deemed filed with the sec , and is not to be incorporated by reference into any of valero 2019s filings under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , respectively . this performance graph and the related textual information are based on historical data and are not indicative of future performance . the following line graph compares the cumulative total return 1 on an investment in our common stock against the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 composite index and an index of peer companies ( that we selected ) for the five-year period commencing december 31 , 2007 and ending december 31 , 2012 . our peer group consists of the following ten companies : alon usa energy , inc. ; bp plc ( bp ) ; cvr energy , inc. ; hess corporation ; hollyfrontier corporation ; marathon petroleum corporation ; phillips 66 ( psx ) ; royal dutch shell plc ( rds ) ; tesoro corporation ; and western refining , inc . our peer group previously included chevron corporation ( cvx ) and exxon mobil corporation ( xom ) but they were replaced with bp , psx , and rds . in 2012 , psx became an independent downstream energy company and was added to our peer group . cvx and xom were replaced with bp and rds as they were viewed as having operations that more closely aligned with our core businesses . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return1 among valero energy corporation , the s&p 500 index , old peer group , and new peer group . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/2007</td><td>12/2008</td><td>12/2009</td><td>12/2010</td><td>12/2011</td><td>12/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>valero common stock</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 31.45</td><td>$ 25.09</td><td>$ 35.01</td><td>$ 32.26</td><td>$ 53.61</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>63.00</td><td>79.67</td><td>91.67</td><td>93.61</td><td>108.59</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>old peer group</td><td>100.00</td><td>80.98</td><td>76.54</td><td>88.41</td><td>104.33</td><td>111.11</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>new peer group</td><td>100.00</td><td>66.27</td><td>86.87</td><td>72.84</td><td>74.70</td><td>76.89</td></tr></table> ____________ 1 assumes that an investment in valero common stock and each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2007 . 201ccumulative total return 201d is based on share price appreciation plus reinvestment of dividends from december 31 , 2007 through december 31 , 2012. .\nQuestion: what was the lowest price group in 2008 and at what price?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "31.45"
}
] |
CONVFINQA141
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncredit facilities . as such , our foreign cash and cash equivalents are not expected to be a key source of liquidity to our domestic operations . at september 30 , 2019 , we had approximately $ 2.9 billion of availability under our committed credit facilities , primarily under our revolving credit facility , the majority of which matures on july 1 , 2022 . this liquidity may be used to provide for ongoing working capital needs and for other general corporate purposes , including acquisitions , dividends and stock repurchases . certain restrictive covenants govern our maximum availability under the credit facilities . we test and report our compliance with these covenants as required and we were in compliance with all of these covenants at september 30 , 2019 . at september 30 , 2019 , we had $ 129.8 million of outstanding letters of credit not drawn cash and cash equivalents were $ 151.6 million at september 30 , 2019 and $ 636.8 million at september 30 , 2018 . we used a significant portion of the cash and cash equivalents on hand at september 30 , 2018 in connection with the closing of the kapstone acquisition . primarily all of the cash and cash equivalents at september 30 , 2019 were held outside of the u.s . at september 30 , 2019 , total debt was $ 10063.4 million , $ 561.1 million of which was current . at september 30 , 2018 , total debt was $ 6415.2 million , $ 740.7 million of which was current . the increase in debt was primarily related to the kapstone acquisition . cash flow activity . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2019</td><td>year ended september 30 , 2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2310.2</td><td>$ 1931.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>$ -4579.6 ( 4579.6 )</td><td>$ -815.1 ( 815.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities</td><td>$ 1780.2</td><td>$ -755.1 ( 755.1 )</td></tr></table> net cash provided by operating activities during fiscal 2019 increased $ 379.0 million from fiscal 2018 primarily due to higher cash earnings and a $ 340.3 million net decrease in the use of working capital compared to the prior year . as a result of the retrospective adoption of asu 2016-15 and asu 2016-18 ( each as hereinafter defined ) as discussed in 201cnote 1 . description of business and summary of significant accounting policies 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements , net cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2018 was reduced by $ 489.7 million and cash provided by investing activities increased $ 483.8 million , primarily for the change in classification of proceeds received for beneficial interests obtained for transferring trade receivables in securitization transactions . net cash used for investing activities of $ 4579.6 million in fiscal 2019 consisted primarily of $ 3374.2 million for cash paid for the purchase of businesses , net of cash acquired ( excluding the assumption of debt ) , primarily related to the kapstone acquisition , and $ 1369.1 million for capital expenditures that were partially offset by $ 119.1 million of proceeds from the sale of property , plant and equipment primarily related to the sale of our atlanta beverage facility , $ 33.2 million of proceeds from corporate owned life insurance benefits and $ 25.5 million of proceeds from property , plant and equipment insurance proceeds related to the panama city , fl mill . net cash used for investing activities of $ 815.1 million in fiscal 2018 consisted primarily of $ 999.9 million for capital expenditures , $ 239.9 million for cash paid for the purchase of businesses , net of cash acquired primarily related to the plymouth acquisition and the schl fcter acquisition , and $ 108.0 million for an investment in grupo gondi . these investments were partially offset by $ 461.6 million of cash receipts on sold trade receivables as a result of the adoption of asu 2016-15 , $ 24.0 million of proceeds from the sale of certain affiliates as well as our solid waste management brokerage services business and $ 23.3 million of proceeds from the sale of property , plant and equipment . in fiscal 2019 , net cash provided by financing activities of $ 1780.2 million consisted primarily of a net increase in debt of $ 2314.6 million , primarily related to the kapstone acquisition and partially offset by cash dividends paid to stockholders of $ 467.9 million and purchases of common stock of $ 88.6 million . in fiscal 2018 , net cash used for financing activities of $ 755.1 million consisted primarily of cash dividends paid to stockholders of $ 440.9 million and purchases of common stock of $ 195.1 million and net repayments of debt of $ 120.1 million. .\nQuestion: what was the sum of net cash provided by operating activities and used for investing in 2019?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-2269.4"
}
] |
CONVFINQA916
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nis expected to begin by late-2018 , after the necessary information technology infrastructure is in place . entergy louisiana proposed to recover the cost of ami through the implementation of a customer charge , net of certain benefits , phased in over the period 2019 through 2022 . the parties reached an uncontested stipulation permitting implementation of entergy louisiana 2019s proposed ami system , with modifications to the proposed customer charge . in july 2017 the lpsc approved the stipulation . entergy louisiana expects to recover the undepreciated balance of its existing meters through a regulatory asset at current depreciation rates . sources of capital entergy louisiana 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt or preferred membership interest issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy louisiana may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred membership interest issuances by entergy louisiana require prior regulatory approval . preferred membership interest and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . entergy louisiana has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy louisiana 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 11173</td><td>$ 22503</td><td>$ 6154</td><td>$ 2815</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $ 350 million scheduled to expire in august 2022 . the credit facility allows entergy louisiana to issue letters of credit against $ 15 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were no cash borrowings and a $ 9.1 million letter of credit outstanding under the credit facility . in addition , entergy louisiana is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to miso . a0 as of december 31 , 2017 , a $ 29.7 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy louisiana 2019s uncommitted letter of credit a0facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy louisiana nuclear fuel company variable interest entities have two separate credit facilities , one in the amount of $ 105 million and one in the amount of $ 85 million , both scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 65.7 million of loans were outstanding under the credit facility for the entergy louisiana river bend nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 43.5 million in letters of credit to support a like amount of commercial paper issued and $ 36.4 million in loans were outstanding under the entergy louisiana waterford nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facilities . entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .\nQuestion: what is the sum of receivables from the money pool in 2016 and 2017?\nAnswer: 33676.0\nQuestion: what is the sum of the receivables in 2014 and 2015?\nAnswer: 8969.0\nQuestion: what is the ratio of 2016 & 2017 to 2014 & 2015?\nAnswer: 3.75471\nQuestion: what is that less 1?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "2.75471"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10066
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>citi</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p financials</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>31-dec-2010</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>30-dec-2011</td><td>55.67</td><td>102.11</td><td>82.94</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>31-dec-2012</td><td>83.81</td><td>118.45</td><td>106.84</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>31-dec-2013</td><td>110.49</td><td>156.82</td><td>144.90</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>31-dec-2014</td><td>114.83</td><td>178.28</td><td>166.93</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>31-dec-2015</td><td>110.14</td><td>180.75</td><td>164.39</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the value of citi at the end of 2015?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "110.14"
}
] |
CONVFINQA7267
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) | 72 snap-on incorporated following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits : ( amounts in millions ) amount . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions )</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 2006</td><td>$ 21.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases 2013 tax positions in prior periods</td><td>0.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross decreases 2013 tax positions in prior periods</td><td>-0.4 ( 0.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross increases 2013 tax positions in the current period</td><td>0.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-3.0 ( 3.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapsing of statutes of limitations</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>unrecognized tax benefits as of december 29 2007</td><td>$ 18.7</td></tr></table> of the $ 18.7 million of unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2007 , approximately $ 16.2 million would impact the effective income tax rate if recognized . interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in income tax expense . during the years ended december 29 , 2007 , december 30 , 2006 , and december 31 , 2005 , the company recognized approximately $ 1.2 million , $ 0.5 million and ( $ 0.5 ) million in net interest expense ( benefit ) , respectively . the company has provided for approximately $ 3.4 million , $ 2.2 million , and $ 1.7 million of accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits at the end of fiscal year 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . during the next 12 months , the company does not anticipate any significant changes to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits , other than the accrual of additional interest expense in an amount similar to the prior year 2019s expense . with few exceptions , snap-on is no longer subject to u.s . federal and state/local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2003 , and snap-on is no longer subject to non-u.s . income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2001 . the undistributed earnings of all non-u.s . subsidiaries totaled $ 338.5 million , $ 247.4 million and $ 173.6 million at the end of fiscal 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . snap-on has not provided any deferred taxes on these undistributed earnings as it considers the undistributed earnings to be permanently invested . determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred income tax liability related to these earnings is not practicable . the american jobs creation act of 2004 ( the 201cajca 201d ) created a one-time tax incentive for u.s . corporations to repatriate accumulated foreign earnings by providing a tax deduction of 85% ( 85 % ) of qualifying dividends received from foreign affiliates . under the provisions of the ajca , snap-on repatriated approximately $ 93 million of qualifying dividends in 2005 that resulted in additional income tax expense of $ 3.3 million for the year . note 9 : short-term and long-term debt notes payable and long-term debt as of december 29 , 2007 , was $ 517.9 million ; no commercial paper was outstanding at december 29 , 2007 . as of december 30 , 2006 , notes payable and long-term debt was $ 549.2 million , including $ 314.9 million of commercial paper . snap-on presented $ 300 million of the december 30 , 2006 , outstanding commercial paper as 201clong-term debt 201d on the accompanying december 30 , 2006 , consolidated balance sheet . on january 12 , 2007 , snap-on sold $ 300 million of unsecured notes consisting of $ 150 million of floating rate notes that mature on january 12 , 2010 , and $ 150 million of fixed rate notes that mature on january 15 , 2017 . interest on the floating rate notes accrues at a rate equal to the three-month london interbank offer rate plus 0.13% ( 0.13 % ) per year and is payable quarterly . interest on the fixed rate notes accrues at a rate of 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) per year and is payable semi-annually . snap-on used the proceeds from the sale of the notes , net of $ 1.5 million of transaction costs , to repay commercial paper obligations issued to finance the acquisition of business solutions . on january 12 , 2007 , the company also terminated a $ 250 million bridge credit agreement that snap-on established prior to its acquisition of business solutions. .\nQuestion: what was the undistributed earnings of all non-u.s. subsidiaries totaled in 2007?\nAnswer: 338.5\nQuestion: and for 2006?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "247.4"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1970
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) company 2019s financial statements and establishes guidelines for recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return . as a result of this adoption , we recorded a $ 1.5 million increase in the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits , which was accounted for as a $ 1.0 million reduction to the june 1 , 2007 balance of retained earnings and a $ 0.5 million reduction to the june 1 , 2007 balance of additional paid-in capital . as of the adoption date , other long-term liabilities included liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits of $ 3.8 million and accrued interest and penalties of $ 0.7 million . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at june 1 2007</td><td>$ 3760</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>93</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-190 ( 190 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at may 31 2008</td><td>$ 3713</td></tr></table> as of may 31 , 2008 , the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate is $ 3.7 million . we recognize accrued interest related to unrecognized income tax benefits in interest expense and accrued penalty expense related to unrecognized tax benefits in sales , general and administrative expenses . during fiscal 2008 , we recorded $ 0.3 million of accrued interest and penalty expense related to the unrecognized income tax benefits . we anticipate the total amount of unrecognized income tax benefits will decrease by $ 1.1 million net of interest and penalties from our foreign operations within the next 12 months as a result of the expiration of the statute of limitations . we conduct business globally and file income tax returns in the united states federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions . in the normal course of business , we are subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world , including such major jurisdictions as the united states and canada . with few exceptions , we are no longer subject to income tax examinations for years ended may 31 , 2003 and prior . we are currently under audit by the internal revenue service of the united states for the 2004 to 2005 tax years . we expect that the examination phase of the audit for the years 2004 to 2005 will conclude in fiscal 2009 . note 8 2014shareholders 2019 equity on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program that authorized the purchase of up to $ 100 million of global payments 2019 stock in the open market or as otherwise may be determined by us , subject to market conditions , business opportunities , and other factors . under this authorization , we repurchased 2.3 million shares of our common stock during fiscal 2008 at a cost of $ 87.0 million , or an average of $ 37.85 per share , including commissions . as of may 31 , 2008 , we had $ 13.0 million remaining under our current share repurchase authorization . no amounts were repurchased during fiscal 2007 . note 9 2014share-based awards and options as of may 31 , 2008 , we had four share-based employee compensation plans . for all share-based awards granted after june 1 , 2006 , compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis . the fair value of share- based awards granted prior to june 1 , 2006 is amortized as compensation expense on an accelerated basis from the date of the grant . there was no share-based compensation capitalized during fiscal 2008 , 2007 , and 2006. .\nQuestion: what was the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits from 2007 to 2008?\nAnswer: -47.0\nQuestion: and as of may of that last year, what was the amount remaining under the current share repurchase authorization?\nAnswer: 13000000.0\nQuestion: assuming an average share price of $ 37.85, what was the number of shares that could be bought with this amount?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "343461.03038"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2794
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ninvestment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 3.6 million to $ 522.2 million . average assets in these portfolios were $ 142.1 billion during 2008 , up slightly from $ 141.4 billion in 2007 . these minor changes , each less than 1% ( 1 % ) , are attributable to the timing of declining equity market valuations and cash flows among our separate account and sub-advised portfolios . net inflows , primarily from institutional investors , were $ 13.2 billion during 2008 , including the $ 1.3 billion transferred from the retirement funds to target-date trusts . decreases in market valuations , net of income , lowered our assets under management in these portfolios by $ 55.3 billion during 2008 . administrative fees increased $ 5.8 million to $ 353.9 million , primarily from increased costs of servicing activities for the mutual funds and their investors . changes in administrative fees are generally offset by similar changes in related operating expenses that are incurred to provide services to the funds and their investors . our largest expense , compensation and related costs , increased $ 18.4 million or 2.3% ( 2.3 % ) from 2007 . this increase includes $ 37.2 million in salaries resulting from an 8.4% ( 8.4 % ) increase in our average staff count and an increase of our associates 2019 base salaries at the beginning of the year . at december 31 , 2008 , we employed 5385 associates , up 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) from the end of 2007 , primarily to add capabilities and support increased volume-related activities and other growth over the past few years . over the course of 2008 , we slowed the growth of our associate base from earlier plans and the prior year . we do not expect the number of our associates to increase in 2009 . we also reduced our annual bonuses $ 27.6 million versus the 2007 year in response to recent and ongoing unfavorable financial market conditions that negatively impacted our operating results . the balance of the increase is attributable to higher employee benefits and employment- related expenses , including an increase of $ 5.7 million in stock-based compensation . entering 2009 , we did not increase the salaries of our highest paid associates . after higher spending during the first quarter of 2008 versus 2007 , investor sentiment in the uncertain and volatile market environment caused us to reduce advertising and promotion spending , which for the year was down $ 3.8 million from 2007 . we expect to reduce these expenditures for 2009 versus 2008 , and estimate that spending in the first quarter of 2009 will be down about $ 5 million from the fourth quarter of 2008 . we vary our level of spending based on market conditions and investor demand as well as our efforts to expand our investor base in the united states and abroad . occupancy and facility costs together with depreciation expense increased $ 18 million , or 12% ( 12 % ) compared to 2007 . we have been expanding and renovating our facilities to accommodate the growth in our associates to meet business demands . other operating expenses were up $ 3.3 million from 2007 . we increased our spending $ 9.8 million , primarily for professional fees and information and other third-party services . reductions in travel and charitable contributions partially offset these increases . our non-operating investment activity resulted in a net loss of $ 52.3 million in 2008 as compared to a net gain of $ 80.4 million in 2007 . this change of $ 132.7 million is primarily attributable to losses recognized in 2008 on our investments in sponsored mutual funds , which resulted from declines in financial market values during the year. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2008</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>capital gain distributions received</td><td>$ 22.1</td><td>$ 5.6</td><td>$ -16.5 ( 16.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other than temporary impairments recognized</td><td>-.3 ( .3 )</td><td>-91.3 ( 91.3 )</td><td>-91.0 ( 91.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gains ( losses ) realized on funddispositions</td><td>5.5</td><td>-4.5 ( 4.5 )</td><td>-10.0 ( 10.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net gain ( loss ) recognized on fund holdings</td><td>$ 27.3</td><td>$ -90.2 ( 90.2 )</td><td>$ -117.5 ( 117.5 )</td></tr></table> we recognized other than temporary impairments of our investments in sponsored mutual funds because of declines in fair value below cost for an extended period . the significant declines in fair value below cost that occurred in 2008 were generally attributable to the adverse and ongoing market conditions discussed in the background section on page 18 of this report . see also the discussion on page 24 of critical accounting policies for other than temporary impairments of available-for-sale securities . in addition , income from money market and bond fund holdings was $ 19.3 million lower than in 2007 due to the significantly lower interest rate environment of 2008 . lower interest rates also led to substantial capital appreciation on our $ 40 million holding of u.s . treasury notes that we sold in december 2008 at a $ 2.6 million gain . management 2019s discussion & analysis 21 .\nQuestion: in 2007, considering the percentage increase and the amount equivalent to it of the total of occupancy and facility costs together with depreciation expense from that year to 2008, what can be concluded to have been, in 2007, that total?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "150.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1604
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nallowance for doubtful accounts is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 160</td><td>$ 133</td><td>$ 86</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>provision</td><td>38</td><td>54</td><td>65</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>amounts written off</td><td>-13 ( 13 )</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 185</td><td>$ 160</td><td>$ 133</td></tr></table> discontinued operations during the fourth quarter of 2009 , schlumberger recorded a net $ 22 million charge related to the resolution of a customs assessment pertaining to its former offshore contract drilling business , as well as the resolution of certain contingencies associated with other previously disposed of businesses . this amount is included in income ( loss ) from discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of income . during the first quarter of 2008 , schlumberger recorded a gain of $ 38 million related to the resolution of a contingency associated with a previously disposed of business . this gain is included in income ( loss ) from discon- tinued operations in the consolidated statement of income . part ii , item 8 .\nQuestion: what is the allowance in doubtful accounts in 2010?\nAnswer: 185.0\nQuestion: what about in 2009?\nAnswer: 160.0\nQuestion: what is the change in these years?\nAnswer: 25.0\nQuestion: what is the allowance in doubtful accounts in 2009?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "160.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10676
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to the consolidated financial statements non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during 2009 , we classified the atlantic star as held for sale and recognized a charge of $ 7.1 million to reduce the carrying value of the ship to its fair value less cost to sell based on a firm offer received during 2009 . this amount was recorded within other operating expenses in our consolidated statement of operations . we determined the fair market value of the atlantic star as of december 31 , 2010 based on comparable ship sales adjusted for the condition , age and size of the ship . we have categorized these inputs as level 3 because they are largely based on our own assump- tions . as of december 31 , 2010 , the carrying amount of the atlantic star which we still believe represents its fair value was $ 46.4 million . the following table presents a reconciliation of the company 2019s fuel call options 2019 beginning and ending balances as follows ( in thousands ) : fair value fair value measurements measurements using significant using significant unobservable unobservable year ended december 31 , 2010 inputs ( level 3 ) year ended december 31 , 2009 inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options fuel call options balance at january 1 , 2010 $ 9998 balance at january 1 , 2009 $ 2007 2007 2007 2007 2014 total gains or losses ( realized/ unrealized ) total gains or losses ( realized/ unrealized ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 2010 balance at january 1 2010</td><td>fairvalue measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options $ 9998</td><td>year ended december 31 2009 balance at january 1 2009</td><td>fairvalue measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options $ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total gains or losses ( realized /unrealized )</td><td>-</td><td>total gains or losses ( realized /unrealized )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>included in other income ( expense )</td><td>-2824 ( 2824 )</td><td>included in other income ( expense )</td><td>-2538 ( 2538 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements</td><td>24539</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements</td><td>12536</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transfers in and/or ( out ) of level 3</td><td>-31713 ( 31713 )</td><td>transfers in and/or ( out ) of level 3</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>balance at december 31 2009</td><td>$ 9998</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at thereporting date</td><td>$ -2824 ( 2824 )</td><td>the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held atthe reporting date</td><td>$ -2538 ( 2538 )</td></tr></table> the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 2824 ) the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 2538 ) during the fourth quarter of 2010 , we changed our valuation technique for fuel call options to a market approach method which employs inputs that are observable . the fair value for fuel call options is determined by using the prevailing market price for the instruments consisting of published price quotes for similar assets based on recent transactions in an active market . we believe that level 2 categorization is appropriate due to an increase in the observability and transparency of significant inputs . previously , we derived the fair value of our fuel call options using standard option pricing models with inputs based on the options 2019 contract terms and data either readily available or formulated from public market informa- tion . the fuel call options were categorized as level 3 because certain inputs , principally volatility , were unobservable . net transfers in and/or out of level 3 are reported as having occurred at the end of the quarter in which the transfer occurred ; therefore , gains or losses reflected in the table above for 2010 include fourth quarter fuel call option gains or losses . the reported fair values are based on a variety of factors and assumptions . accordingly , the fair values may not represent actual values of the financial instru- ments and long-lived assets that could have been realized as of december 31 , 2010 or december 31 , 2009 , or that will be realized in the future and do not include expenses that could be incurred in an actual sale or settlement . derivative instruments we are exposed to market risk attributable to changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices . we manage these risks through a combi- nation of our normal operating and financing activities and through the use of derivative financial instruments pursuant to our hedging practices and policies . the financial impact of these hedging instruments is pri- marily offset by corresponding changes in the under- lying exposures being hedged . we achieve this by closely matching the amount , term and conditions of the derivative instrument with the underlying risk being hedged . we do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes . we monitor our derivative positions using techniques including market valuations and sensitivity analyses. .\nQuestion: what was the value of purchase issuances and settlements at the end of 2010?\nAnswer: 24539.0\nQuestion: what was the value at the end of 2009?\nAnswer: 12536.0\nQuestion: what was the net change?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "12003.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4481
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis annually , beginning in 2006 , if power market prices drop below the ppa prices . accordingly , because the price is not fixed , the table above does not report power from that plant as sold forward after 2005 . under the ppas with nypa for the output of power from indian point 3 and fitzpatrick , the non-utility nuclear business is obligated to produce at an average capacity factor of 85% ( 85 % ) with a financial true-up payment to nypa should nypa's cost to purchase power due to an output shortfall be higher than the ppas' price . the calculation of any true-up payments is based on two two-year periods . for the first period , which ran through november 20 , 2002 , indian point 3 and fitzpatrick operated at 95% ( 95 % ) and 97% ( 97 % ) , respectively , under the true-up formula . credits of up to 5% ( 5 % ) reflecting period one generation above 85% ( 85 % ) can be used to offset any output shortfalls in the second period , which runs through the end of the ppas on december 31 , 2004 . entergy continually monitors industry trends in order to determine whether asset impairments or other losses could result from a decline in value , or cancellation , of merchant power projects , and records provisions for impairments and losses accordingly . marketing and trading the earnings of entergy's energy commodity services segment are exposed to commodity price market risks primarily through entergy's 50%-owned , unconsolidated investment in entergy-koch . entergy-koch trading ( ekt ) uses value-at-risk models as one measure of the market risk of a loss in fair value for ekt's natural gas and power trading portfolio . actual future gains and losses in portfolios will differ from those estimated based upon actual fluctuations in market rates , operating exposures , and the timing thereof , and changes in the portfolio of derivative financial instruments during the year . to manage its portfolio , ekt enters into various derivative and contractual transactions in accordance with the policy approved by the trading committee of the governing board of entergy-koch . the trading portfolio consists of physical and financial natural gas and power as well as other energy and weather-related contracts . these contracts take many forms , including futures , forwards , swaps , and options . characteristics of ekt's value-at-risk method and the use of that method are as follows : fffd value-at-risk is used in conjunction with stress testing , position reporting , and profit and loss reporting in order to measure and control the risk inherent in the trading and mark-to-market portfolios . fffd ekt estimates its value-at-risk using a model based on j.p . morgan's risk metrics methodology combined with a monte carlo simulation approach . fffd ekt estimates its daily value-at-risk for natural gas and power using a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level . ekt's daily value-at-risk is a measure that indicates that , if prices moved against the positions , the loss in neutralizing the portfolio would not be expected to exceed the calculated value-at-risk . fffd ekt seeks to limit the daily value-at-risk on any given day to a certain dollar amount approved by the trading committee . ekt's value-at-risk measures , which it calls daily earnings at risk ( de@r ) , for its trading portfolio were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>de@r at end of period</td><td>$ 15.2 million</td><td>$ 5.5 million</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average de@r for the period</td><td>$ 10.8 million</td><td>$ 6.4 million</td></tr></table> ekt's de@r increased in 2002 compared to 2001 as a result of an increase in the size of the position held and an increase in the volatility of natural gas prices in the latter part of the year . for all derivative and contractual transactions , ekt is exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to these transactions . relevant considerations when assessing ekt's credit risk exposure include: .\nQuestion: what was the total of daily earnings at risk at the end of the period in 2002?\nAnswer: 15.2\nQuestion: and what was that total in 2001?\nAnswer: 5.5\nQuestion: what was, then, the change in this total over the year?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "9.7"
}
] |
CONVFINQA9009
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nproducts and software , as well as ongoing investment in next-generation technologies , partially offset by savings from cost-reduction initiatives . reorganization of business charges increased due to employee severance costs and expenses related to the exit of a facility . sg&a expenses decreased , primarily due to lower marketing expenses and savings from cost-reduction initiatives , partially offset by increased expenditures on information technology upgrades . as a percentage of net sales in 2007 as compared to 2006 , gross margin and operating margin decreased , and sg&a expenses and r&d expenditures increased . the segment 2019s backlog was $ 647 million at december 31 , 2007 , compared to $ 1.4 billion at december 31 , 2006 . this decrease in backlog was primarily due to a decline in customer demand driven by the segment 2019s limited product portfolio . the segment shipped 159.1 million units in 2007 , a 27% ( 27 % ) decrease compared to shipments of 217.4 million units in 2006 . the overall decrease reflects decreased unit shipments of products for all technologies . for the full year 2007 , unit shipments : ( i ) decreased substantially in asia and emea , ( ii ) decreased in north america , and ( iii ) increased in latin america . although unit shipments by the segment decreased in 2007 , total unit shipments in the worldwide handset market increased by approximately 16% ( 16 % ) . the segment estimates its worldwide market share was approximately 14% ( 14 % ) for the full year 2007 , a decrease of approximately 8 percentage points versus full year 2006 . in 2007 , asp decreased approximately 9% ( 9 % ) compared to 2006 . the overall decrease in asp was driven primarily by changes in the product-tier and geographic mix of sales . by comparison , asp decreased approximately 11% ( 11 % ) in 2006 and 10% ( 10 % ) in 2005 . the segment has several large customers located throughout the world . in 2007 , aggregate net sales to the segment 2019s five largest customers accounted for approximately 42% ( 42 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . besides selling directly to carriers and operators , the segment also sells products through a variety of third-party distributors and retailers , which account for approximately 33% ( 33 % ) of the segment 2019s net sales . the largest of these distributors was brightstar corporation . although the u.s . market continued to be the segment 2019s largest individual market , many of our customers , and more than 54% ( 54 % ) of our segment 2019s 2007 net sales , were outside the u.s . the largest of these international markets were brazil , china and mexico . home and networks mobility segment the home and networks mobility segment designs , manufactures , sells , installs and services : ( i ) digital video , internet protocol video and broadcast network interactive set-tops , end-to-end video delivery systems , broadband access infrastructure platforms , and associated data and voice customer premise equipment to cable television and telecom service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 201chome business 201d ) , and ( ii ) wireless access systems , including cellular infrastructure systems and wireless broadband systems , to wireless service providers ( collectively , referred to as the 201cnetwork business 201d ) . in 2008 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 33% ( 33 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 27% ( 27 % ) in 2007 and 21% ( 21 % ) in 2006 . ( dollars in millions ) 2008 2007 2006 2008 20142007 2007 20142006 years ended december 31 percent change . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 2008</td><td>years ended december 31 2007</td><td>years ended december 31 2006</td><td>years ended december 31 2008 20142007</td><td>2007 20142006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>segment net sales</td><td>$ 10086</td><td>$ 10014</td><td>$ 9164</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td><td>9% ( 9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating earnings</td><td>918</td><td>709</td><td>787</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td><td>( 10 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> segment results 20142008 compared to 2007 in 2008 , the segment 2019s net sales increased 1% ( 1 % ) to $ 10.1 billion , compared to $ 10.0 billion in 2007 . the 1% ( 1 % ) increase in net sales primarily reflects a 16% ( 16 % ) increase in net sales in the home business , partially offset by an 11% ( 11 % ) decrease in net sales in the networks business . the 16% ( 16 % ) increase in net sales in the home business is primarily driven by a 17% ( 17 % ) increase in net sales of digital entertainment devices , reflecting a 19% ( 19 % ) increase in unit shipments to 18.0 million units , partially offset by lower asp due to product mix shift and pricing pressure . the 11% ( 11 % ) decrease in net sales in the networks business was primarily driven by : ( i ) the absence of net sales by the embedded communication computing group ( 201cecc 201d ) that was divested at the end of 2007 , and ( ii ) lower net sales of iden , gsm and cdma infrastructure equipment , partially offset by higher net sales of umts infrastructure equipment . on a geographic basis , the 1% ( 1 % ) increase in net sales was primarily driven by higher net sales in latin america and asia , partially offset by lower net sales in north america . the increase in net sales in latin america was 63management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c49054 pcn : 066000000 ***%%pcmsg|63 |00024|yes|no|02/24/2009 12:31|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .\nQuestion: what is 21% of the 2006 segment net sales?\nAnswer: 1924.44\nQuestion: what is 33% of the 2008 segment net sales?\nAnswer: 3328.38\nQuestion: what is the difference?\nAnswer: 1403.94\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.72953"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2998
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmorgan stanley notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) lending commitments . primary lending commitments are those that are originated by the company whereas secondary lending commitments are purchased from third parties in the market . the commitments include lending commitments that are made to investment grade and non-investment grade companies in connection with corporate lending and other business activities . commitments for secured lending transactions . secured lending commitments are extended by the company to companies and are secured by real estate or other physical assets of the borrower . loans made under these arrangements typically are at variable rates and generally provide for over-collateralization based upon the creditworthiness of the borrower . forward starting reverse repurchase agreements . the company has entered into forward starting securities purchased under agreements to resell ( agreements that have a trade date at or prior to december 31 , 2013 and settle subsequent to period-end ) that are primarily secured by collateral from u.s . government agency securities and other sovereign government obligations . commercial and residential mortgage-related commitments . the company enters into forward purchase contracts involving residential mortgage loans , residential mortgage lending commitments to individuals and residential home equity lines of credit . in addition , the company enters into commitments to originate commercial and residential mortgage loans . underwriting commitments . the company provides underwriting commitments in connection with its capital raising sources to a diverse group of corporate and other institutional clients . other lending commitments . other commitments generally include commercial lending commitments to small businesses and commitments related to securities-based lending activities in connection with the company 2019s wealth management business segment . the company sponsors several non-consolidated investment funds for third-party investors where the company typically acts as general partner of , and investment advisor to , these funds and typically commits to invest a minority of the capital of such funds , with subscribing third-party investors contributing the majority . the company 2019s employees , including its senior officers , as well as the company 2019s directors , may participate on the same terms and conditions as other investors in certain of these funds that the company forms primarily for client investment , except that the company may waive or lower applicable fees and charges for its employees . the company has contractual capital commitments , guarantees , lending facilities and counterparty arrangements with respect to these investment funds . premises and equipment . the company has non-cancelable operating leases covering premises and equipment ( excluding commodities operating leases , shown separately ) . at december 31 , 2013 , future minimum rental commitments under such leases ( net of subleases , principally on office rentals ) were as follows ( dollars in millions ) : year ended operating premises leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended</td><td>operating premises leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 672</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>656</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>621</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>554</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2018</td><td>481</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2712</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the total operating lease liability for 2014 and 2015?\nAnswer: 1328.0\nQuestion: and including 2016?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1949.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA5558
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nour refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is the difference between the prices of refined products sold and the costs of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks refined , including the costs to transport these inputs to our refineries , the costs of purchased products and manufacturing expenses , including depreciation . the crack spread is a measure of the difference between market prices for refined products and crude oil , commonly used by the industry as a proxy for the refining margin . crack spreads can fluctuate significantly , particularly when prices of refined products do not move in the same relationship as the cost of crude oil . as a performance benchmark and a comparison with other industry participants , we calculate midwest ( chicago ) and u.s . gulf coast crack spreads that we feel most closely track our operations and slate of products . posted light louisiana sweet ( 201clls 201d ) prices and a 6-3-2-1 ratio of products ( 6 barrels of crude oil producing 3 barrels of gasoline , 2 barrels of distillate and 1 barrel of residual fuel ) are used for the crack spread calculation . our refineries can process significant amounts of sour crude oil which typically can be purchased at a discount to sweet crude oil . the amount of this discount , the sweet/sour differential , can vary significantly causing our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin to differ from the crack spreads which are based upon sweet crude . in general , a larger sweet/sour differential will enhance our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin . in 2009 , the sweet/sour differential narrowed , due to a variety of worldwide economic and petroleum industry related factors , primarily related to lower hydrocarbon demand . sour crude accounted for 50 percent , 52 percent and 54 percent of our crude oil processed in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . the following table lists calculated average crack spreads for the midwest ( chicago ) and gulf coast markets and the sweet/sour differential for the past three years . ( dollars per barrel ) 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars per barrel )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>chicago lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 3.52</td><td>$ 3.27</td><td>$ 8.87</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>u.s . gulf coast lls 6-3-2-1</td><td>$ 2.54</td><td>$ 2.45</td><td>$ 6.42</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>sweet/sour differential ( a )</td><td>$ 5.82</td><td>$ 11.99</td><td>$ 11.59</td></tr></table> sweet/sour differential ( a ) $ 5.82 $ 11.99 $ 11.59 ( a ) calculated using the following mix of crude types as compared to lls. : 15% ( 15 % ) arab light , 20% ( 20 % ) kuwait , 10% ( 10 % ) maya , 15% ( 15 % ) western canadian select , 40% ( 40 % ) mars . in addition to the market changes indicated by the crack spreads and sweet/sour differential , our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is impacted by factors such as : 2022 the types of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks processed , 2022 the selling prices realized for refined products , 2022 the impact of commodity derivative instruments used to manage price risk , 2022 the cost of products purchased for resale , and 2022 changes in manufacturing costs , which include depreciation . manufacturing costs are primarily driven by the cost of energy used by our refineries and the level of maintenance costs . planned turnaround and major maintenance activities were completed at our catlettsburg , garyville , and robinson refineries in 2009 . we performed turnaround and major maintenance activities at our robinson , catlettsburg , garyville and canton refineries in 2008 and at our catlettsburg , robinson and st . paul park refineries in 2007 . our retail marketing gross margin for gasoline and distillates , which is the difference between the ultimate price paid by consumers and the cost of refined products , including secondary transportation and consumer excise taxes , also impacts rm&t segment profitability . there are numerous factors including local competition , seasonal demand fluctuations , the available wholesale supply , the level of economic activity in our marketing areas and weather conditions that impact gasoline and distillate demand throughout the year . refined product demand increased for several years until 2008 when it decreased due to the combination of significant increases in retail petroleum prices , a broad slowdown in general economic activity , and the impact of increased ethanol blending into gasoline . in 2009 refined product demand continued to decline . for our marketing area , we estimate a gasoline demand decline of about one percent and a distillate demand decline of about 12 percent from 2008 levels . market demand declines for gasoline and distillates generally reduce the product margin we can realize . we also estimate gasoline and distillate demand in our marketing area decreased about three percent in 2008 compared to 2007 levels . the gross margin on merchandise sold at retail outlets has been historically less volatile. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in the percentage of sour crude accounted as a percent of the crude oil processed from 2008 to 2009?\nAnswer: 2.0\nQuestion: what is the average crack spread for the midwest ( chicago) in 2009?\nAnswer: 3.52\nQuestion: what about in 2007?\nAnswer: 8.87\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-5.35"
}
] |
CONVFINQA9907
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nliquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of an adverse liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and geopolitical and macroeconomic conditions . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company-specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons and over different stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal liquidity stress metrics that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . pursuant to the federal reserve board 2019s final rule regarding lcr disclosures , effective april 1 , 2017 , citi began to disclose lcr in the prescribed format . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2017</td><td>sept . 30 2017</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 446.4</td><td>$ 448.6</td><td>$ 403.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>364.3</td><td>365.1</td><td>332.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 82.1</td><td>$ 83.5</td><td>$ 71.3</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased year- over-year , as the increase in the hqla ( as discussed above ) more than offset an increase in modeled net outflows . the increase in modeled net outflows was primarily driven by changes in assumptions , including changes in methodology to better align citi 2019s outflow assumptions with those embedded in its resolution planning . sequentially , citi 2019s lcr remained unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . prescribed factors would be required to be applied to the various categories of asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2017 , it will need to evaluate a final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2018 . citi expects that the nsfr final rules implementation period will be communicated along with the final version of the rules. .\nQuestion: what was the change of hqla from 12/31/16 to 12/31/17?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "42.7"
}
] |
CONVFINQA7240
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2017 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>period</td><td>total numberof sharespurchased</td><td>averageprice paidper share</td><td>total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a )</td><td>total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms</td><td>approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 2017</td><td>515762</td><td>$ 77.15</td><td>292145</td><td>223617</td><td>$ 1.6 billion</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 2017</td><td>2186889</td><td>$ 81.21</td><td>216415</td><td>1970474</td><td>$ 1.4 billion</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 2017</td><td>2330263</td><td>$ 87.76</td><td>798</td><td>2329465</td><td>$ 1.2 billion</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>5032914</td><td>$ 83.83</td><td>509358</td><td>4523556</td><td>$ 1.2 billion</td></tr></table> ( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2017 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans . ( b ) on september 21 , 2016 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock ( the 2016 program ) with no expiration date . as of december 31 , 2017 , we had $ 1.2 billion remaining available for purchase under the 2016 program . on january 23 , 2018 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to an additional $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock with no expiration date. .\nQuestion: what was the share price in november 2017?\nAnswer: 81.21\nQuestion: what was it in october 2017?\nAnswer: 77.15\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 4.06\nQuestion: what was the october price?\nAnswer: 77.15\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.05262"
}
] |
CONVFINQA5971
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nother long term debt in december 2012 , the company entered into a $ 50.0 million recourse loan collateralized by the land , buildings and tenant improvements comprising the company 2019s corporate headquarters . the loan has a seven year term and maturity date of december 2019 . the loan bears interest at one month libor plus a margin of 1.50% ( 1.50 % ) , and allows for prepayment without penalty . the loan includes covenants and events of default substantially consistent with the company 2019s credit agreement discussed above . the loan also requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including transfers of any interest in the property . as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 40.0 million and $ 42.0 million , respectively . the weighted average interest rate on the loan was 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the following are the scheduled maturities of long term debt as of december 31 , 2017 : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>63000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>25000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>86250</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023 and thereafter</td><td>600000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total scheduled maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 801250</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>current maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr></table> interest expense , net was $ 34.5 million , $ 26.4 million , and $ 14.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.3 million , $ 1.2 million , and $ 0.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 7 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2017 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2017 as well as .\nQuestion: what was the interest expense net in 2017?\nAnswer: 34.5\nQuestion: and what was it in 2016?\nAnswer: 26.4\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\nAnswer: 8.1\nQuestion: what was the interest expense net in 2016?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "26.4"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6978
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nshareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td><td>12/31/2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 103.84</td><td>$ 152.16</td><td>$ 165.35</td><td>$ 154.61</td><td>$ 189.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.99</td><td>$ 153.54</td><td>$ 174.54</td><td>$ 176.94</td><td>$ 198.09</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 107.49</td><td>$ 151.97</td><td>$ 190.07</td><td>$ 158.22</td><td>$ 192.80</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the net change in the ups share price from 2011 to 2016?\nAnswer: 89.72\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\nAnswer: 0.8972\nQuestion: what is the net change in the s&p 500 index from 2011 to 2016?\nAnswer: 98.09\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.9809"
}
] |
CONVFINQA9856
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ninformation about stock options at december 31 , 2007 follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 2007shares in thousandsrange of exercise prices</td><td>options outstanding shares</td><td>options outstanding weighted- averageexercise price</td><td>options outstanding weighted-average remaining contractual life ( in years )</td><td>options outstanding shares</td><td>weighted-averageexercise price</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 37.43 2013 $ 46.99</td><td>1444</td><td>$ 43.05</td><td>4.0</td><td>1444</td><td>$ 43.05</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>47.00 2013 56.99</td><td>3634</td><td>53.43</td><td>5.4</td><td>3022</td><td>53.40</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>57.00 2013 66.99</td><td>3255</td><td>60.32</td><td>5.2</td><td>2569</td><td>58.96</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>67.00 2013 76.23</td><td>5993</td><td>73.03</td><td>5.5</td><td>3461</td><td>73.45</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>14326</td><td>$ 62.15</td><td>5.3</td><td>10496</td><td>$ 59.95</td></tr></table> ( a ) the weighted-average remaining contractual life was approximately 4.2 years . at december 31 , 2007 , there were approximately 13788000 options in total that were vested and are expected to vest . the weighted-average exercise price of such options was $ 62.07 per share , the weighted-average remaining contractual life was approximately 5.2 years , and the aggregate intrinsic value at december 31 , 2007 was approximately $ 92 million . stock options granted in 2005 include options for 30000 shares that were granted to non-employee directors that year . no such options were granted in 2006 or 2007 . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2007 include 20944 deferred stock units awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment under sfas 123r until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vestings or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on all awarded units on the date of grant . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 11.37 , $ 10.75 and $ 9.83 per option , respectively . to determine stock-based compensation expense under sfas 123r , the grant-date fair value is applied to the options granted with a reduction made for estimated forfeitures . at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 options for 10743000 and 13582000 shares of common stock , respectively , were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 58.38 and $ 56.58 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 52 million , $ 111 million and $ 31 million , respectively . at december 31 , 2007 the aggregate intrinsic value of all options outstanding and exercisable was $ 94 million and $ 87 million , respectively . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was approximately $ 111 million , $ 233 million and $ 98 million , respectively . the actual tax benefit realized for tax deduction purposes from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was approximately $ 39 million , $ 82 million and $ 34 million , respectively . there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2007 , 2006 or 2005 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 40116726 at december 31 , 2007 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 41787400 shares at december 31 , 2007 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans , the employee stock purchase plan as described below , and a director plan . during 2007 , we issued approximately 2.1 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we intend to utilize treasury stock for future stock option exercises . as discussed in note 1 accounting policies , we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of sfas 123 prospectively to all employee awards including stock options granted , modified or settled after january 1 , 2003 . as permitted under sfas 123 , we recognized compensation expense for stock options on a straight-line basis over the pro rata vesting period . total compensation expense recognized related to pnc stock options in 2007 was $ 29 million compared with $ 31 million in 2006 and $ 29 million in 2005 . pro forma effects a table is included in note 1 accounting policies that sets forth pro forma net income and basic and diluted earnings per share as if compensation expense had been recognized under sfas 123 and 123r , as amended , for stock options for 2005 . for purposes of computing stock option expense and 2005 pro forma results , we estimated the fair value of stock options using the black-scholes option pricing model . the model requires the use of numerous assumptions , many of which are very subjective . therefore , the 2005 pro forma results are estimates of results of operations as if compensation expense had been recognized for all stock-based compensation awards and are not indicative of the impact on future periods. .\nQuestion: what is the sum of the weighted-average exercise price for options outstanding in 2005 and 2006?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "114.96"
}
] |
CONVFINQA3394
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 17 . pension plans and postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plans ( continued ) benefit payments the following table sets forth amounts of benefits expected to be paid over the next ten years from the company 2019s pension and postretirement plans as of december 31 , 2004: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>pension benefits</td><td>other postretirement benefits</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>$ 125</td><td>$ 30</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>132</td><td>31</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>143</td><td>31</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>154</td><td>33</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2009</td><td>166</td><td>34</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2010-2014</td><td>1052</td><td>193</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1772</td><td>$ 352</td></tr></table> 18 . stock compensation plans on may 18 , 2000 , the shareholders of the hartford approved the hartford incentive stock plan ( the 201c2000 plan 201d ) , which replaced the hartford 1995 incentive stock plan ( the 201c1995 plan 201d ) . the terms of the 2000 plan were substantially similar to the terms of the 1995 plan except that the 1995 plan had an annual award limit and a higher maximum award limit . under the 2000 plan , awards may be granted in the form of non-qualified or incentive stock options qualifying under section 422a of the internal revenue code , performance shares or restricted stock , or any combination of the foregoing . in addition , stock appreciation rights may be granted in connection with all or part of any stock options granted under the 2000 plan . in december 2004 , the 2000 plan was amended to allow for grants of restricted stock units effective as of january 1 , 2005 . the aggregate number of shares of stock , which may be awarded , is subject to a maximum limit of 17211837 shares applicable to all awards for the ten-year duration of the 2000 plan . all options granted have an exercise price equal to the market price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant , and an option 2019s maximum term is ten years and two days . certain options become exercisable over a three year period commencing one year from the date of grant , while certain other options become exercisable upon the attainment of specified market price appreciation of the company 2019s common shares . for any year , no individual employee may receive an award of options for more than 1000000 shares . as of december 31 , 2004 , the hartford had not issued any incentive stock options under the 2000 plan . performance awards of common stock granted under the 2000 plan become payable upon the attainment of specific performance goals achieved over a period of not less than one nor more than five years , and the restricted stock granted is subject to a restriction period . on a cumulative basis , no more than 20% ( 20 % ) of the aggregate number of shares which may be awarded under the 2000 plan are available for performance shares and restricted stock awards . also , the maximum award of performance shares for any individual employee in any year is 200000 shares . in 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , the company granted shares of common stock of 315452 , 333712 and 40852 with weighted average prices of $ 64.93 , $ 38.13 and $ 62.28 , respectively , related to performance share and restricted stock awards . in 1996 , the company established the hartford employee stock purchase plan ( 201cespp 201d ) . under this plan , eligible employees of the hartford may purchase common stock of the company at a 15% ( 15 % ) discount from the lower of the closing market price at the beginning or end of the quarterly offering period . the company may sell up to 5400000 shares of stock to eligible employees under the espp . in 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , 345262 , 443467 and 408304 shares were sold , respectively . the per share weighted average fair value of the discount under the espp was $ 9.31 , $ 11.96 , and $ 11.70 in 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . additionally , during 1997 , the hartford established employee stock purchase plans for certain employees of the company 2019s international subsidiaries . under these plans , participants may purchase common stock of the hartford at a fixed price at the end of a three-year period . the activity under these programs is not material. .\nQuestion: what was the total of pension benefits in 2007?\nAnswer: 143.0\nQuestion: and what was the total of other postretirement benefits in that same year?\nAnswer: 31.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the combined total of pension benefits\tand other postretirement benefits in that year?\nAnswer: 174.0\nQuestion: and what was the combined total of pension benefit and other postretirement benefits in all the years?\nAnswer: 2124.0\nQuestion: how much, then, does the combined total in 2007 represent in relation to this combined total in all the years, in percentage?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.08192"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2837
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nliquidity and capital resources the major components of changes in cash flows for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 are discussed in the following paragraphs . the following table summarizes our cash flow from operating activities , investing activities and financing activities for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 ( in millions of dollars ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 1847.8</td><td>$ 1679.7</td><td>$ 1529.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-961.2 ( 961.2 )</td><td>-1482.8 ( 1482.8 )</td><td>-959.8 ( 959.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash used in financing activities</td><td>-851.2 ( 851.2 )</td><td>-239.7 ( 239.7 )</td><td>-708.1 ( 708.1 )</td></tr></table> cash flows provided by operating activities the most significant items affecting the comparison of our operating cash flows for 2016 and 2015 are summarized below : changes in assets and liabilities , net of effects from business acquisitions and divestitures , decreased our cash flow from operations by $ 205.2 million in 2016 , compared to a decrease of $ 316.7 million in 2015 , primarily as a result of the following : 2022 our accounts receivable , exclusive of the change in allowance for doubtful accounts and customer credits , increased $ 52.3 million during 2016 due to the timing of billings net of collections , compared to a $ 15.7 million increase in 2015 . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , our days sales outstanding were 38.1 and 38.3 days , or 26.1 and 25.8 days net of deferred revenue , respectively . 2022 our accounts payable decreased $ 9.8 million during 2016 compared to an increase of $ 35.6 million during 2015 , due to the timing of payments . 2022 cash paid for capping , closure and post-closure obligations was $ 11.0 million lower during 2016 compared to 2015 . the decrease in cash paid for capping , closure , and post-closure obligations is primarily due to payments in 2015 related to a required capping event at one of our closed landfills . 2022 cash paid for remediation obligations was $ 13.2 million lower during 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to the timing of obligations . in addition , cash paid for income taxes was approximately $ 265 million and $ 321 million for 2016 and 2015 , respectively . income taxes paid in 2016 and 2015 reflect the favorable tax depreciation provisions of the protecting americans from tax hikes act signed into law in december 2015 as well as the realization of certain tax credits . cash paid for interest was $ 330.2 million and $ 327.6 million for 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the most significant items affecting the comparison of our operating cash flows for 2015 and 2014 are summarized below : changes in assets and liabilities , net of effects of business acquisitions and divestitures , decreased our cash flow from operations by $ 316.7 million in 2015 , compared to a decrease of $ 295.6 million in 2014 , primarily as a result of the following : 2022 our accounts receivable , exclusive of the change in allowance for doubtful accounts and customer credits , increased $ 15.7 million during 2015 due to the timing of billings , net of collections , compared to a $ 54.3 million increase in 2014 . as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , our days sales outstanding were 38 days , or 26 and 25 days net of deferred revenue , respectively . 2022 our accounts payable increased $ 35.6 million and $ 3.3 million during 2015 and 2014 , respectively , due to the timing of payments as of december 31 , 2015. .\nQuestion: what was the net cash from operating activities in 2016?\nAnswer: 1847.8\nQuestion: what was the net cash from investing activities in 2016?\nAnswer: -961.2\nQuestion: what is the sum?\nAnswer: 886.6\nQuestion: what was the net cash from financing activities in 2016?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-851.2"
}
] |
CONVFINQA9753
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nunited parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations liquidity and capital resources operating activities the following is a summary of the significant sources ( uses ) of cash from operating activities ( amounts in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 807</td><td>$ 3804</td><td>$ 3338</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-cash operating activities ( a )</td><td>7301</td><td>4505</td><td>4398</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans )</td><td>-917 ( 917 )</td><td>-1436 ( 1436 )</td><td>-3240 ( 3240 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>income tax receivables and payables</td><td>280</td><td>236</td><td>-319 ( 319 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>changes in working capital and other noncurrent assets and liabilities</td><td>-148 ( 148 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>-340 ( 340 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other operating activities</td><td>-107 ( 107 )</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net cash from operating activities</td><td>$ 7216</td><td>$ 7073</td><td>$ 3835</td></tr></table> ( a ) represents depreciation and amortization , gains and losses on derivative and foreign exchange transactions , deferred income taxes , provisions for uncollectible accounts , pension and postretirement benefit expense , stock compensation expense , impairment charges and other non-cash items . cash from operating activities remained strong throughout the 2010 to 2012 time period . operating cash flow was favorably impacted in 2012 , compared with 2011 , by lower contributions into our defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans ; however , this was partially offset by changes in our working capital position , which was impacted by overall growth in the business . the change in the cash flows for income tax receivables and payables in 2011 and 2010 was primarily related to the timing of discretionary pension contributions during 2010 , as discussed further in the following paragraph . except for discretionary or accelerated fundings of our plans , contributions to our company-sponsored pension plans have largely varied based on whether any minimum funding requirements are present for individual pension plans . 2022 in 2012 , we made a $ 355 million required contribution to the ups ibt pension plan . 2022 in 2011 , we made a $ 1.2 billion contribution to the ups ibt pension plan , which satisfied our 2011 contribution requirements and also approximately $ 440 million in contributions that would not have been required until after 2011 . 2022 in 2010 , we made $ 2.0 billion in discretionary contributions to our ups retirement and ups pension plans , and $ 980 million in required contributions to our ups ibt pension plan . 2022 the remaining contributions in the 2010 through 2012 period were largely due to contributions to our international pension plans and u.s . postretirement medical benefit plans . as discussed further in the 201ccontractual commitments 201d section , we have minimum funding requirements in the next several years , primarily related to the ups ibt pension , ups retirement and ups pension plans . as of december 31 , 2012 , the total of our worldwide holdings of cash and cash equivalents was $ 7.327 billion . approximately $ 4.211 billion of this amount was held in european subsidiaries with the intended purpose of completing the acquisition of tnt express n.v . ( see note 16 to the consolidated financial statements ) . excluding this portion of cash held outside the u.s . for acquisition-related purposes , approximately 50%-60% ( 50%-60 % ) of the remaining cash and cash equivalents are held by foreign subsidiaries throughout the year . the amount of cash held by our u.s . and foreign subsidiaries fluctuates throughout the year due to a variety of factors , including the timing of cash receipts and disbursements in the normal course of business . cash provided by operating activities in the united states continues to be our primary source of funds to finance domestic operating needs , capital expenditures , share repurchases and dividend payments to shareowners . to the extent that such amounts represent previously untaxed earnings , the cash held by foreign subsidiaries would be subject to tax if such amounts were repatriated in the form of dividends ; however , not all international cash balances would have to be repatriated in the form of a dividend if returned to the u.s . when amounts earned by foreign subsidiaries are expected to be indefinitely reinvested , no accrual for taxes is provided. .\nQuestion: what was the value of net cash from operating activities in 2012?\nAnswer: 7216.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2011?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "7073.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA7118
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhumana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 15 . stockholders 2019 equity dividends the following table provides details of dividend payments , excluding dividend equivalent rights , in 2016 , 2017 , and 2018 under our board approved quarterly cash dividend policy : payment amount per share amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>paymentdate</td><td>amountper share</td><td>totalamount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 1.16</td><td>$ 172</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 1.49</td><td>$ 216</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 1.90</td><td>$ 262</td></tr></table> on november 2 , 2018 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.50 per share that was paid on january 25 , 2019 to stockholders of record on december 31 , 2018 , for an aggregate amount of $ 68 million . declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change . in february 2019 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.55 per share payable on april 26 , 2019 to stockholders of record on march 29 , 2019 . stock repurchases our board of directors may authorize the purchase of our common shares . under our share repurchase authorization , shares may have been purchased from time to time at prevailing prices in the open market , by block purchases , through plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , or in privately-negotiated transactions ( including pursuant to accelerated share repurchase agreements with investment banks ) , subject to certain regulatory restrictions on volume , pricing , and timing . on february 14 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 2.25 billion of our common shares expiring on december 31 , 2017 , exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans . on february 16 , 2017 , we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement , the february 2017 asr , with goldman , sachs & co . llc , or goldman sachs , to repurchase $ 1.5 billion of our common stock as part of the $ 2.25 billion share repurchase authorized on february 14 , 2017 . on february 22 , 2017 , we made a payment of $ 1.5 billion to goldman sachs from available cash on hand and received an initial delivery of 5.83 million shares of our common stock from goldman sachs based on the then current market price of humana common stock . the payment to goldman sachs was recorded as a reduction to stockholders 2019 equity , consisting of a $ 1.2 billion increase in treasury stock , which reflected the value of the initial 5.83 million shares received upon initial settlement , and a $ 300 million decrease in capital in excess of par value , which reflected the value of stock held back by goldman sachs pending final settlement of the february 2017 asr . upon settlement of the february 2017 asr on august 28 , 2017 , we received an additional 0.84 million shares as determined by the average daily volume weighted-average share price of our common stock during the term of the agreement of $ 224.81 , less a discount and subject to adjustments pursuant to the terms and conditions of the february 2017 asr , bringing the total shares received under this program to 6.67 million . in addition , upon settlement we reclassified the $ 300 million value of stock initially held back by goldman sachs from capital in excess of par value to treasury stock . subsequent to settlement of the february 2017 asr , we repurchased an additional 3.04 million shares in the open market , utilizing the remaining $ 750 million of the $ 2.25 billion authorization prior to expiration . on december 14 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 3.0 billion of our common shares expiring on december 31 , 2020 , exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans. .\nQuestion: what was the amount per share paid in 2018?\nAnswer: 1.9\nQuestion: what was the amount paid per share in 2017?\nAnswer: 1.49\nQuestion: what is the ratio of the payments made from 2018 to 2017?\nAnswer: 1.27517\nQuestion: what is that less 1?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.27517"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4087
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2011 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 31 , 2016 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/31/1612/28/13 1/2/1612/31/11 1/3/1512/29/12 *$ 100 invested on 12/31/11 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/29/2012</td><td>12/28/2013</td><td>1/3/2015</td><td>1/2/2016</td><td>12/31/2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>129.23</td><td>133.94</td><td>181.06</td><td>200.10</td><td>242.50</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>116.41</td><td>165.47</td><td>188.69</td><td>200.32</td><td>216.54</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 400 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>118.41</td><td>165.38</td><td>170.50</td><td>178.74</td><td>219.65</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .\nQuestion: what was the price of cadence design systems inc. as of 1/2/16?\nAnswer: 200.1\nQuestion: and as of 1/3/15?\nAnswer: 181.06\nQuestion: so what was the difference in price between these two dates?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "19.04"
}
] |
CONVFINQA9636
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nto determine stock-based compensation expense , the grant- date fair value is applied to the options granted with a reduction for estimated forfeitures . we recognize compensation expense for stock options on a straight-line basis over the pro rata vesting period . at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , options for 12337000 and 13397000 shares of common stock were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 106.08 and $ 118.21 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 37 million , $ 4 million and $ 5 million . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 118 million , $ 41 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the actual tax benefit realized for tax deduction purposes from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 41 million , $ 14 million and $ 5 million , respectively . there were no options granted in excess of market value in 2012 , 2011 or 2010 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were 29192854 at december 31 , 2012 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under equity compensation plans totaled 30537674 shares at december 31 , 2012 , which includes shares available for issuance under the incentive plans and the employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) as described below . during 2012 , we issued approximately 1.7 million shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . awards granted to non-employee directors in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 include 25620 , 27090 and 29040 deferred stock units , respectively , awarded under the outside directors deferred stock unit plan . a deferred stock unit is a phantom share of our common stock , which requires liability accounting treatment until such awards are paid to the participants as cash . as there are no vesting or service requirements on these awards , total compensation expense is recognized in full on awarded deferred stock units on the date of grant . incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock price on the date of grant . the value of certain incentive/ performance unit share awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals generally over a three-year period . the personnel and compensation committee of the board of directors approves the final award payout with respect to incentive/performance unit share awards . restricted stock/unit awards have various vesting periods generally ranging from 36 months to 60 months . beginning in 2012 , we incorporated several risk-related performance changes to certain incentive compensation programs . in addition to achieving certain financial performance metrics relative to our peers , the final payout amount will be subject to a negative adjustment if pnc fails to meet certain risk-related performance metrics as specified in the award agreement . however , the p&cc has the discretion to reduce any or all of this negative adjustment under certain circumstances . these awards have a three-year performance period and are payable in either stock or a combination of stock and cash . additionally , performance-based restricted share units were granted in 2012 to certain of our executives in lieu of stock options , with generally the same terms and conditions as the 2011 awards of the same . the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 60.68 , $ 63.25 and $ 54.59 per share , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . table 130 : nonvested incentive/performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards 2013 rollforward shares in thousands nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares weighted- average date fair nonvested restricted stock/ shares weighted- average date fair . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>shares in thousands december 31 2011</td><td>nonvested incentive/ performance unit shares 830</td><td>weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 61.68</td><td>nonvested restricted stock/ unit shares 2512</td><td>weighted-averagegrantdate fairvalue $ 54.87</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>granted</td><td>465</td><td>60.70</td><td>1534</td><td>60.67</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>vested</td><td>-100 ( 100 )</td><td>64.21</td><td>-831 ( 831 )</td><td>45.47</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-76 ( 76 )</td><td>60.27</td><td>-154 ( 154 )</td><td>60.51</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>1119</td><td>$ 61.14</td><td>3061</td><td>$ 60.04</td></tr></table> in the chart above , the unit shares and related weighted- average grant-date fair value of the incentive/performance awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares , as those dividends will be paid in cash . at december 31 , 2012 , there was $ 86 million of unrecognized deferred compensation expense related to nonvested share- based compensation arrangements granted under the incentive plans . this cost is expected to be recognized as expense over a period of no longer than five years . the total fair value of incentive/performance unit share and restricted stock/unit awards vested during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was approximately $ 55 million , $ 52 million and $ 39 million , respectively . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 203 .\nQuestion: combined, what was the weighted-average grant-date fair value of incentive/ performance unit share awards and restricted stock/unit awards granted for 2011 and 2010?\nAnswer: 123.93\nQuestion: and the average?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "61.965"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6441
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv affiliates are as follows : as of december 31 , 2017 ( in percentages ) infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg ( 1 ) ................................................................................................... . 39 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>as of december 31 2017 ( in percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg ( 1 )</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg ( 1 )</td><td>27</td></tr></table> infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg ( 1 ) ................................................................................................ . 27 ______________________________ ( 1 ) see note 29 - subsequent events in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information . research and development our business models leverage innovation and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications . research and development expense was $ 72 million , $ 78 million and $ 119 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives . intellectual property we attach importance to protecting our intellectual property , including safeguarding our confidential information and through our patents , trademarks and copyrights , in order to preserve our investment in research and development , manufacturing and marketing . patents may cover processes , equipment , products , intermediate products and product uses . we also seek to register trademarks as a means of protecting the brand names of our company and products . patents . in most industrial countries , patent protection exists for new substances and formulations , as well as for certain unique applications and production processes . however , we do business in regions of the world where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to enforce . confidential information . we maintain stringent information security policies and procedures wherever we do business . such information security policies and procedures include data encryption , controls over the disclosure and safekeeping of confidential information and trade secrets , as well as employee awareness training . trademarks . amcel ae , aoplus ae , ateva ae , avicor ae , celanese ae , celanex ae , celcon ae , celfx ae , celstran ae , celvolit ae , clarifoil ae , dur- o-set ae , ecomid ae , ecovae ae , forflex ae , forprene ae , frianyl ae , fortron ae , ghr ae , gumfit ae , gur ae , hostaform ae , laprene ae , metalx ae , mowilith ae , mt ae , nilamid ae , nivionplast ae , nutrinova ae , nylfor ae , pibiflex ae , pibifor ae , pibiter ae , polifor ae , resyn ae , riteflex ae , slidex ae , sofprene ae , sofpur ae , sunett ae , talcoprene ae , tecnoprene ae , thermx ae , tufcor ae , vantage ae , vectra ae , vinac ae , vinamul ae , vitaldose ae , zenite ae and certain other branded products and services named in this document are registered or reserved trademarks or service marks owned or licensed by celanese . the foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all registered or reserved trademarks and service marks owned or licensed by celanese . fortron ae is a registered trademark of fortron industries llc . hostaform ae is a registered trademark of hoechst gmbh . mowilith ae and nilamid ae are registered trademarks of celanese in most european countries . we monitor competitive developments and defend against infringements on our intellectual property rights . neither celanese nor any particular business segment is materially dependent upon any one patent , trademark , copyright or trade secret . environmental and other regulation matters pertaining to environmental and other regulations are discussed in item 1a . risk factors , as well as note 2 - summary of accounting policies , note 16 - environmental and note 24 - commitments and contingencies in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. .\nQuestion: what was the research and development expense in 2017?\nAnswer: 72.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2016?\nAnswer: 78.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the variation over the year?\nAnswer: -6.0\nQuestion: and what is this variation as a percent of the 2016 expense?\nAnswer: -0.07692\nQuestion: and for the precedent year of that period, what was that variation for the segment?\nAnswer: -41.0\nQuestion: and what percentage did this 2015-2016 variation represent in relation to the 2015 research and development expense?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-0.34454"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8214
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) maturities 2014as of december 31 , 2003 , aggregate principal payments of long-term debt , including capital leases , for the next five years and thereafter are estimated to be ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2004</td><td>$ 77622</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>115444</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>365051</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>728153</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>808043</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1650760</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total cash obligations</td><td>3745073</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>accreted value of original issue discount of the ati 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) notes</td><td>-339601 ( 339601 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>accreted value of the related warrants</td><td>-44247 ( 44247 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance as of december 31 2003</td><td>$ 3361225</td></tr></table> the holders of the company 2019s convertible notes have the right to require the company to repurchase their notes on specified dates prior to their maturity dates in 2009 and 2010 , but the company may pay the purchase price by issuing shares of class a common stock , subject to certain conditions . obligations with respect to the right of the holders to put the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes and 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes have been included in the table above as if such notes mature on the date of their put rights in 2006 and 2007 , respectively . ( see note 19. ) 8 . derivative financial instruments under the terms of the credit facilities , the company is required to enter into interest rate protection agreements on at least 50% ( 50 % ) of its variable rate debt . under these agreements , the company is exposed to credit risk to the extent that a counterparty fails to meet the terms of a contract . such exposure is limited to the current value of the contract at the time the counterparty fails to perform . the company believes its contracts as of december 31 , 2003 are with credit worthy institutions . as of december 31 , 2003 , the company had three interest rate caps outstanding that include an aggregate notional amount of $ 500.0 million ( each at an interest rate of 5% ( 5 % ) ) and expire in 2004 . as of december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , liabilities related to derivative financial instruments of $ 0.0 million and $ 15.5 million are reflected in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet . during the year ended december 31 , 2003 , the company recorded an unrealized loss of approximately $ 0.3 million ( net of a tax benefit of approximately $ 0.2 million ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of cash flow hedges and reclassified $ 5.9 million ( net of a tax benefit of approximately $ 3.2 million ) into results of operations . during the year ended december 31 , 2002 , the company recorded an unrealized loss of approximately $ 9.1 million ( net of a tax benefit of approximately $ 4.9 million ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of cash flow hedges and reclassified $ 19.5 million ( net of a tax benefit of approximately $ 10.5 million ) into results of operations . hedge ineffectiveness resulted in a gain of approximately $ 1.0 million and a loss of approximately $ 2.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively , which are recorded in loss on investments and other expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for those periods . the company records the changes in fair value of its derivative instruments that are not accounted for as hedges in loss on investments and other expense . the company does not anticipate reclassifying any derivative losses into its statement of operations within the next twelve months , as there are no amounts included in other comprehensive loss as of december 31 , 2003. .\nQuestion: what was the balance as of december 2013?\nAnswer: 3361225.0\nQuestion: and what was the long-term debt due in 2004?\nAnswer: 77622.0\nQuestion: what is, then, the balance in that year, considering the payments of long-term debt?\nAnswer: 3283603.0\nQuestion: and what is the balance in the year of 2005, also considering the payments of the long-term debt that was due in that year?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "3168159.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2617
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncourse of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities . the counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions . we establish credit limits for each counterparty . our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative financial instruments . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . value at risk the estimates in the table below are intended to measure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions . a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures . the models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confidence level . the var calculation used historical interest and foreign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future . the market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set . the calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur . further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely correlates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally offset by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure . the positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; commodity swaps , futures , and options ; and equity instruments . the calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are offset by these market-risk-sensitive instruments . the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 27 , 2018 and may 28 , 2017 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 27 , 2018. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>fair value impact may 27 2018</td><td>fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2018</td><td>fair value impact may 282017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest rate instruments</td><td>$ 33.2</td><td>$ 27.5</td><td>$ 25.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>foreign currency instruments</td><td>21.3</td><td>23.1</td><td>24.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commodity instruments</td><td>1.9</td><td>2.1</td><td>3.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>equity instruments</td><td>2.0</td><td>1.4</td><td>1.3</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the total of interest rate instruments as of may 2018?\nAnswer: 33.2\nQuestion: and what was it in may of the previous year?\nAnswer: 25.1\nQuestion: by how much, then, did it increase?\nAnswer: 8.1\nQuestion: and in that same year of 2018, what was the total of those interest rate instruments and the foreign currency ones?\nAnswer: 54.5\nQuestion: including the commodity instruments, what becomes this total?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "56.4"
}
] |
CONVFINQA7533
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nexpected term 2014 the company uses historical employee exercise and option expiration data to estimate the expected term assumption for the black-scholes grant-date valuation . the company believes that this historical data is currently the best estimate of the expected term of a new option , and that generally its employees exhibit similar exercise behavior . risk-free interest rate 2014 the yield on zero-coupon u.s . treasury securities for a period that is commensurate with the expected term assumption is used as the risk-free interest rate . expected dividend yield 2014 expected dividend yield is calculated by annualizing the cash dividend declared by the company 2019s board of directors for the current quarter and dividing that result by the closing stock price on the date of grant . until such time as the company 2019s board of directors declares a cash dividend for an amount that is different from the current quarter 2019s cash dividend , the current dividend will be used in deriving this assumption . cash dividends are not paid on options , restricted stock or restricted stock units . in connection with the acquisition , the company granted restricted stock awards to replace outstanding restricted stock awards of linear employees . these restricted stock awards entitle recipients to voting and nonforfeitable dividend rights from the date of grant . stock-based compensation expensexp p the amount of stock-based compensation expense recognized during a period is based on the value of the awards that are ultimately expected to vest . forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised , if necessary , in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates . the term 201cforfeitures 201d is distinct from 201ccancellations 201d or 201cexpirations 201d and represents only the unvested portion of the surrendered stock-based award . based on an analysis of its historical forfeitures , the company has applied an annual forfeitureff rate of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) to all unvested stock-based awards as of november 2 , 2019 . this analysis will be re-evaluated quarterly and the forfeiture rate will be adjusted as necessary . ultimately , the actual expense recognized over the vesting period will only be for those awards that vest . total stock-based compensation expense recognized is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>$ 20628</td><td>$ 18733</td><td>$ 12569</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>research and development</td><td>75305</td><td>81444</td><td>51258</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>selling marketing general and administrative</td><td>51829</td><td>50988</td><td>40361</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>special charges</td><td>2538</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total stock-based compensation expense</td><td>$ 150300</td><td>$ 151165</td><td>$ 104188</td></tr></table> as of november 2 , 2019 and november 3 , 2018 , the company capitalized $ 6.8 million and $ 7.1 million , respectively , of stock-based compensation in inventory . additional paid-in-capital ( apic ) pp poolp p ( ) the company adopted asu 2016-09 during fiscal 2018 . asu 2016-09 eliminated the apic pool and requires that excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies be recorded in the income statement when awards are settled . as a result of this adoption the company recorded total excess tax benefits of $ 28.7 million and $ 26.2 million in fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2018 , respectively , from its stock-based compensation payments within income tax expense in its consolidated statements of income . for fiscal 2017 , the apic pool represented the excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation that were available to absorb future tax deficiencies . if the amount of future tax deficiencies was greater than the available apic pool , the company recorded the excess as income tax expense in its consolidated statements of income . for fiscal 2017 , the company had a sufficient apic pool to cover any tax deficiencies recorded and as a result , these deficiencies did not affect its results of operations . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what was the cost of sales in 2019?\nAnswer: 20628.0\nQuestion: what was the cost in 2018?\nAnswer: 18733.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1895.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2298
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\naeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2012 increased $ 69 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 105 million from c-130 programs due to an increase in risk retirements ; about $ 50 million from f-16 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries partially offset by a decline in risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million from f-35 production contracts due to increased production volume and risk retirements ; and about $ 50 million from the completion of purchased intangible asset amortization on certain f-16 contracts . partially offsetting the increases was lower operating profit of about $ 90 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 50 million from decreased production volume and risk retirements on the f-22 program partially offset by a resolution of a contractual matter in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 45 million primarily due to a decrease in risk retirements on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to increased risk retirements and volume . operating profit for c-5 programs was comparable to 2011 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 30 million lower for 2012 compared to 2011 . backlog backlog decreased in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to lower orders on f-16 , c-5 , and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on the f-35 program . backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to lower orders on f-35 and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on f-16 programs . trends we expect aeronautics 2019 net sales to increase in 2014 in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2013 primarily due to an increase in net sales from f-35 production contracts . operating profit is expected to increase slightly from 2013 , resulting in a slight decrease in operating margins between the years due to program mix . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides advanced technology systems and expertise , integrated information technology solutions , and management services across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence , and other government customers . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continued downturn in federal information technology budgets . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8367</td><td>$ 8846</td><td>$ 9381</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>759</td><td>808</td><td>874</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>9.3% ( 9.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>8300</td><td>8700</td><td>9300</td></tr></table> 2013 compared to 2012 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 479 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , for 2013 compared to 2012 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of about $ 495 million due to decreased volume on various programs ( command and control programs for classified customers , ngi , and eram programs ) ; and approximately $ 320 million due to the completion of certain programs ( such as total information processing support services , the transportation worker identification credential ( twic ) , and odin ) . the decrease was partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 340 million due to the start-up of certain programs ( such as the disa gsm-o and the national science foundation antarctic support ) . is&gs 2019 operating profit decreased $ 49 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , for 2013 compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 55 million due to certain programs nearing the end of their lifecycles , partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 15 million due to the start-up of certain programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were comparable for 2013 compared to 2012 compared to 2011 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2012 decreased $ 535 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 485 million due to the substantial completion of various programs during 2011 ( primarily jtrs ; odin ; and u.k . census ) ; and about $ 255 million due to lower volume on numerous other programs ( primarily hanford; .\nQuestion: what is the operating profit in 2013?\nAnswer: 759.0\nQuestion: what about in 2012\nAnswer: 808.0\nQuestion: what is the total for two years?\nAnswer: 1567.0\nQuestion: what about the total after including 2011?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "2441.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA7945
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to the base rate increases and the volume/weather effect , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in demand coupled with an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of lower fuel refunds in 2011 versus 2010 , partially offset by a decrease in the average market price of natural gas . other regulatory charges decreased primarily due to the distribution in the first quarter 2011 of $ 17.4 million to customers of the 2007 rough production cost equalization remedy receipts . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rough production cost equalization proceedings . 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009 net revenue</td><td>$ 485.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>27.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>27.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rough production cost equalization</td><td>18.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>16.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>securitization transition charge</td><td>15.3</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-44.3 ( 44.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>-5.7 ( 5.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 540.2</td></tr></table> the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to increased sales to municipal and co-op customers due to the addition of new contracts . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , resulting from a 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) increase in customers , coupled with the effect of more favorable weather on residential sales . billed electricity usage increased a total of 777 gwh , or 5% ( 5 % ) . the rough production cost equalization variance is due to an additional $ 18.6 million allocation recorded in the second quarter of 2009 for 2007 rough production cost equalization receipts ordered by the puct to texas retail customers over what was originally allocated to entergy texas prior to the jurisdictional separation of entergy gulf states , inc . into entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas , effective december 2007 , as discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to rate actions , including an annual base rate increase of $ 59 million beginning august 2010 as a result of the settlement of the december 2009 rate case . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case settlement . the securitization transition charge variance is due to the issuance of securitization bonds . in november 2009 , entergy texas restoration funding , llc , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . the securitization transition charge is offset with a corresponding increase in interest on long-term debt with no impact on net income . see note 5 to the financial statements for further discussion of the securitization bond issuance. .\nQuestion: what was the net revenue in 2010?\nAnswer: 540.2\nQuestion: and what was it in 2009?\nAnswer: 485.1\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\nAnswer: 55.1\nQuestion: and what percentage does this change represent in relation to that 2009 net revenue?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.11358"
}
] |
CONVFINQA3168
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npipeline transportation 2013 we own a system of pipelines through marathon pipe line llc ( 201cmpl 201d ) and ohio river pipe line llc ( 201corpl 201d ) , our wholly-owned subsidiaries . our pipeline systems transport crude oil and refined products primarily in the midwest and gulf coast regions to our refineries , our terminals and other pipeline systems . our mpl and orpl wholly-owned and undivided interest common carrier systems consist of 1737 miles of crude oil lines and 1825 miles of refined product lines comprising 32 systems located in 11 states . the mpl common carrier pipeline network is one of the largest petroleum pipeline systems in the united states , based on total barrels delivered . our common carrier pipeline systems are subject to state and federal energy regulatory commission regulations and guidelines , including published tariffs for the transportation of crude oil and refined products . third parties generated 13 percent of the crude oil and refined product shipments on our mpl and orpl common carrier pipelines in 2009 . our mpl and orpl common carrier pipelines transported the volumes shown in the following table for each of the last three years . pipeline barrels handled ( thousands of barrels per day ) 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( thousands of barrels per day )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>crude oil trunk lines</td><td>1279</td><td>1405</td><td>1451</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>refined products trunk lines</td><td>953</td><td>960</td><td>1049</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>2232</td><td>2365</td><td>2500</td></tr></table> we also own 196 miles of private crude oil pipelines and 850 miles of private refined products pipelines , and we lease 217 miles of common carrier refined product pipelines . we have partial ownership interests in several pipeline companies that have approximately 780 miles of crude oil pipelines and 3600 miles of refined products pipelines , including about 970 miles operated by mpl . in addition , mpl operates most of our private pipelines and 985 miles of crude oil and 160 miles of natural gas pipelines owned by our e&p segment . our major refined product pipelines include the owned and operated cardinal products pipeline and the wabash pipeline . the cardinal products pipeline delivers refined products from kenova , west virginia , to columbus , ohio . the wabash pipeline system delivers product from robinson , illinois , to various terminals in the area of chicago , illinois . other significant refined product pipelines owned and operated by mpl extend from : robinson , illinois , to louisville , kentucky ; garyville , louisiana , to zachary , louisiana ; and texas city , texas , to pasadena , texas . in addition , as of december 31 , 2009 , we had interests in the following refined product pipelines : 2022 65 percent undivided ownership interest in the louisville-lexington system , a petroleum products pipeline system extending from louisville to lexington , kentucky ; 2022 60 percent interest in muskegon pipeline llc , which owns a refined products pipeline extending from griffith , indiana , to north muskegon , michigan ; 2022 50 percent interest in centennial pipeline llc , which owns a refined products system connecting the gulf coast region with the midwest market ; 2022 17 percent interest in explorer pipeline company , a refined products pipeline system extending from the gulf coast to the midwest ; and 2022 6 percent interest in wolverine pipe line company , a refined products pipeline system extending from chicago , illinois , to toledo , ohio . our major owned and operated crude oil lines run from : patoka , illinois , to catlettsburg , kentucky ; patoka , illinois , to robinson , illinois ; patoka , illinois , to lima , ohio ; lima , ohio to canton , ohio ; samaria , michigan , to detroit , michigan ; and st . james , louisiana , to garyville , louisiana . as of december 31 , 2009 , we had interests in the following crude oil pipelines : 2022 51 percent interest in loop llc , the owner and operator of loop , which is the only u.s . deepwater oil port , located 18 miles off the coast of louisiana , and a crude oil pipeline connecting the port facility to storage caverns and tanks at clovelly , louisiana ; 2022 59 percent interest in locap llc , which owns a crude oil pipeline connecting loop and the capline system; .\nQuestion: what was the number of refined products trunk lines in 2009?\nAnswer: 953.0\nQuestion: what was the number in 2008?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "960.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2202
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents the notional amounts for outstanding derivative instruments provide one measure of the transaction volume outstanding and do not represent the amount of the company 2019s exposure to credit or market loss . the credit risk amounts represent the company 2019s gross exposure to potential accounting loss on derivative instruments that are outstanding or unsettled if all counterparties failed to perform according to the terms of the contract , based on then-current currency or interest rates at each respective date . the company 2019s exposure to credit loss and market risk will vary over time as currency and interest rates change . although the table above reflects the notional and credit risk amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments , it does not reflect the gains or losses associated with the exposures and transactions that the instruments are intended to hedge . the amounts ultimately realized upon settlement of these financial instruments , together with the gains and losses on the underlying exposures , will depend on actual market conditions during the remaining life of the instruments . the company generally enters into master netting arrangements , which are designed to reduce credit risk by permitting net settlement of transactions with the same counterparty . to further limit credit risk , the company generally enters into collateral security arrangements that provide for collateral to be received or posted when the net fair value of certain financial instruments fluctuates from contractually established thresholds . the company presents its derivative assets and derivative liabilities at their gross fair values in its consolidated balance sheets . the net cash collateral received by the company related to derivative instruments under its collateral security arrangements was $ 1.0 billion as of september 26 , 2015 and $ 2.1 billion as of september 27 , 2014 . under master netting arrangements with the respective counterparties to the company 2019s derivative contracts , the company is allowed to net settle transactions with a single net amount payable by one party to the other . as of september 26 , 2015 and september 27 , 2014 , the potential effects of these rights of set-off associated with the company 2019s derivative contracts , including the effects of collateral , would be a reduction to both derivative assets and derivative liabilities of $ 2.2 billion and $ 1.6 billion , respectively , resulting in net derivative liabilities of $ 78 million and $ 549 million , respectively . accounts receivable receivables the company has considerable trade receivables outstanding with its third-party cellular network carriers , wholesalers , retailers , value-added resellers , small and mid-sized businesses and education , enterprise and government customers . the company generally does not require collateral from its customers ; however , the company will require collateral in certain instances to limit credit risk . in addition , when possible , the company attempts to limit credit risk on trade receivables with credit insurance for certain customers or by requiring third-party financing , loans or leases to support credit exposure . these credit-financing arrangements are directly between the third-party financing company and the end customer . as such , the company generally does not assume any recourse or credit risk sharing related to any of these arrangements . as of september 26 , 2015 , the company had one customer that represented 10% ( 10 % ) or more of total trade receivables , which accounted for 12% ( 12 % ) . as of september 27 , 2014 , the company had two customers that represented 10% ( 10 % ) or more of total trade receivables , one of which accounted for 16% ( 16 % ) and the other 13% ( 13 % ) . the company 2019s cellular network carriers accounted for 71% ( 71 % ) and 72% ( 72 % ) of trade receivables as of september 26 , 2015 and september 27 , 2014 , respectively . vendor non-trade receivables the company has non-trade receivables from certain of its manufacturing vendors resulting from the sale of components to these vendors who manufacture sub-assemblies or assemble final products for the company . the company purchases these components directly from suppliers . vendor non-trade receivables from three of the company 2019s vendors accounted for 38% ( 38 % ) , 18% ( 18 % ) and 14% ( 14 % ) of total vendor non-trade receivables as of september 26 , 2015 and three of the company 2019s vendors accounted for 51% ( 51 % ) , 16% ( 16 % ) and 14% ( 14 % ) of total vendor non-trade receivables as of september 27 , 2014 . note 3 2013 consolidated financial statement details the following tables show the company 2019s consolidated financial statement details as of september 26 , 2015 and september 27 , 2014 ( in millions ) : property , plant and equipment , net . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>land and buildings</td><td>$ 6956</td><td>$ 4863</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>machinery equipment and internal-use software</td><td>37038</td><td>29639</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>leasehold improvements</td><td>5263</td><td>4513</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross property plant and equipment</td><td>49257</td><td>39015</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accumulated depreciation and amortization</td><td>-26786 ( 26786 )</td><td>-18391 ( 18391 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total property plant and equipment net</td><td>$ 22471</td><td>$ 20624</td></tr></table> apple inc . | 2015 form 10-k | 53 .\nQuestion: what was the change in leasehold improvements between 2014 and 2015?\nAnswer: 750.0\nQuestion: and what was the change in total property plant and equipment net between 2014 and 2015?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1847.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8890
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe fair value of our grants receivable is determined using a discounted cash flow model , which discounts future cash flows using an appropriate yield curve . as of december 28 , 2013 , and december 29 , 2012 , the carrying amount of our grants receivable was classified within other current assets and other long-term assets , as applicable . our long-term debt recognized at amortized cost is comprised of our senior notes and our convertible debentures . the fair value of our senior notes is determined using active market prices , and it is therefore classified as level 1 . the fair value of our convertible long-term debt is determined using discounted cash flow models with observable market inputs , and it takes into consideration variables such as interest rate changes , comparable securities , subordination discount , and credit-rating changes , and it is therefore classified as level 2 . the nvidia corporation ( nvidia ) cross-license agreement liability in the preceding table was incurred as a result of entering into a long-term patent cross-license agreement with nvidia in january 2011 . we agreed to make payments to nvidia over six years . as of december 28 , 2013 , and december 29 , 2012 , the carrying amount of the liability arising from the agreement was classified within other accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities , as applicable . the fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow model , which discounts future cash flows using our incremental borrowing rates . note 5 : cash and investments cash and investments at the end of each period were as follows : ( in millions ) dec 28 , dec 29 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>dec 282013</td><td>dec 292012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>available-for-sale investments</td><td>$ 18086</td><td>$ 14001</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash</td><td>854</td><td>593</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>equity method investments</td><td>1038</td><td>992</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>loans receivable</td><td>1072</td><td>979</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-marketable cost method investments</td><td>1270</td><td>1202</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reverse repurchase agreements</td><td>800</td><td>2850</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>trading assets</td><td>8441</td><td>5685</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total cash and investments</td><td>$ 31561</td><td>$ 26302</td></tr></table> in the third quarter of 2013 , we sold our shares in clearwire corporation , which had been accounted for as available-for-sale marketable equity securities , and our interest in clearwire communications , llc ( clearwire llc ) , which had been accounted for as an equity method investment . in total , we received proceeds of $ 470 million on these transactions and recognized a gain of $ 439 million , which is included in gains ( losses ) on equity investments , net on the consolidated statements of income . proceeds received and gains recognized for each investment are included in the \"available-for-sale investments\" and \"equity method investments\" sections that follow . table of contents intel corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what is the balance of total cash and investments as of december 28, 2013?\nAnswer: 31561.0\nQuestion: what about in 2012?\nAnswer: 26302.0\nQuestion: what is the change in balance?\nAnswer: 5259.0\nQuestion: what is the balance of total cash and investments as of december 28, 2012?\nAnswer: 26302.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.19995"
}
] |
CONVFINQA5859
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n1 2 4 n o t e s effective january 1 , 2011 , all u.s . employees , including u.s . legacy bgi employees , will participate in the brsp . all plan assets in the two legacy bgi plans , including the 401k plan and retirement plan ( see below ) , were merged into the brsp on january 1 , 2011 . under the combined brsp , employee contributions of up to 8% ( 8 % ) of eligible compensation , as defined by the plan and subject to irc limitations , will be matched by the company at 50% ( 50 % ) . in addition , the company will continue to make an annual retirement contribution to eligible participants equal to 3-5% ( 3-5 % ) of eligible compensation . blackrock institutional trust company 401 ( k ) savings plan ( formerly the bgi 401 ( k ) savings plan ) the company assumed a 401 ( k ) plan ( the 201cbgi plan 201d ) covering employees of former bgi as a result of the bgi transaction . as part of the bgi plan , employee contributions for participants with at least one year of service were matched at 200% ( 200 % ) of participants 2019 pre-tax contributions up to 2% ( 2 % ) of base salary and overtime , and matched 100% ( 100 % ) of the next 2% ( 2 % ) of base salary and overtime , as defined by the plan and subject to irc limitations . the maximum matching contribution a participant would have received is an amount equal to 6% ( 6 % ) of base salary up to the irc limitations . the bgi plan expense was $ 12 million for the year ended december 31 , 2010 and immaterial to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for the year ended december 31 , 2009 . effective january 1 , 2011 , the net assets of this plan merged into the brsp . blackrock institutional trust company retirement plan ( formerly the bgi retirement plan ) the company assumed a defined contribution money purchase pension plan ( 201cbgi retirement plan 201d ) as a result of the bgi transaction . all salaried employees of former bgi and its participating affiliates who were u.s . residents on the u.s . payroll were eligible to participate . for participants earning less than $ 100000 in base salary , the company contributed 6% ( 6 % ) of a participant 2019s total compensation ( base salary , overtime and performance bonus ) up to $ 100000 . for participants earning $ 100000 or more in base salary , the company contributed 6% ( 6 % ) of a participant 2019s base salary and overtime up to the irc limita- tion of $ 245000 in 2010 . these contributions were 25% ( 25 % ) vested once the participant has completed two years of service and then vested at a rate of 25% ( 25 % ) for each additional year of service completed . employees with five or more years of service under the retirement plan were 100% ( 100 % ) vested in their entire balance . the retirement plan expense was $ 13 million for the year ended december 31 , 2010 and immaterial to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for the year ended december 31 , 2009 . effective january 1 , 2011 , the net assets of this plan merged into the brsp . blackrock group personal pension plan blackrock investment management ( uk ) limited ( 201cbim 201d ) , a wholly-owned subsidiary of the company , contributes to the blackrock group personal pension plan , a defined contribution plan for all employees of bim . bim contributes between 6% ( 6 % ) and 15% ( 15 % ) of each employee 2019s eligible compensation . the expense for this plan was $ 22 million , $ 13 million and $ 16 million for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . defined benefit plans in 2009 , prior to the bgi transaction , the company had several defined benefit pension plans in japan , germany , luxembourg and jersey . all accrued benefits under these defined benefit plans are currently frozen and the plans are closed to new participants . in 2008 , the defined benefit pension values in luxembourg were transferred into a new defined contribution plan for such employees , removing future liabilities . participant benefits under the plans will not change with salary increases or additional years of service . through the bgi transaction , the company assumed defined benefit pension plans in japan and germany which are closed to new participants . during 2010 , these plans merged into the legacy blackrock plans in japan ( the 201cjapan plan 201d ) and germany . at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the plan assets for these plans were approximately $ 19 million and $ 10 million , respectively , and the unfunded obligations were less than $ 6 million and $ 3 million , respectively , which were recorded in accrued compensation and benefits on the consolidated statements of financial condition . benefit payments for the next five years and in aggregate for the five years thereafter are not expected to be material . defined benefit plan assets for the japan plan of approximately $ 16 million are invested using a total return investment approach whereby a mix of equity securities , debt securities and other investments are used to preserve asset values , diversify risk and achieve the target investment return benchmark . investment strategies and asset allocations are based on consideration of plan liabilities and the funded status of the plan . investment performance and asset allocation are measured and monitored on an ongoing basis . the current target allocations for the plan assets are 45-50% ( 45-50 % ) for u.s . and international equity securities , 50-55% ( 50-55 % ) for u.s . and international fixed income securities and 0-5% ( 0-5 % ) for cash and cash equivalents . the table below provides the fair value of the defined benefit japan plan assets at december 31 , 2010 by asset category . the table also identifies the level of inputs used to determine the fair value of assets in each category . quoted prices significant in active other markets for observable identical assets inputs december 31 , ( dollar amounts in millions ) ( level 1 ) ( level 2 ) 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollar amounts in millions )</td><td>quoted prices inactive marketsfor identical assets ( level 1 )</td><td>significant other observable inputs ( level 2 )</td><td>december 31 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 9</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity securities</td><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fixed income securities</td><td>2014</td><td>3</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fair value of plan assets</td><td>$ 13</td><td>$ 3</td><td>$ 16</td></tr></table> the assets and unfunded obligation for the defined benefit pension plan in germany and jersey were immaterial to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements at december 31 , 2010 . post-retirement benefit plans prior to the bgi transaction , the company had requirements to deliver post-retirement medical benefits to a closed population based in the united kingdom and through the bgi transaction , the company assumed a post-retirement benefit plan to a closed population of former bgi employees in the united kingdom . for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , expenses and unfunded obligations for these benefits were immaterial to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements . in addition , through the bgi transaction , the company assumed a requirement to deliver post-retirement medical benefits to a .\nQuestion: what was the value for the expense related to personal pension plans in 2010?\nAnswer: 22.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2009?\nAnswer: 13.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 9.0\nQuestion: what was the 2009 value?\nAnswer: 13.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.69231"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8030
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntroubled debt restructurings ( tdrs ) a tdr is a loan whose terms have been restructured in a manner that grants a concession to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty . tdrs result from our loss mitigation activities , and include rate reductions , principal forgiveness , postponement/reduction of scheduled amortization , and extensions , which are intended to minimize economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of collateral . additionally , tdrs also result from borrowers that have been discharged from personal liability through chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligations to pnc . in those situations where principal is forgiven , the amount of such principal forgiveness is immediately charged off . some tdrs may not ultimately result in the full collection of principal and interest , as restructured , and result in potential incremental losses . these potential incremental losses have been factored into our overall alll estimate . the level of any subsequent defaults will likely be affected by future economic conditions . once a loan becomes a tdr , it will continue to be reported as a tdr until it is ultimately repaid in full , the collateral is foreclosed upon , or it is fully charged off . we held specific reserves in the alll of $ .4 billion and $ .5 billion at december 31 , 2014 and december 31 , 2013 , respectively , for the total tdr portfolio . table 67 : summary of troubled debt restructurings in millions december 31 december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>december 312014</td><td>december 312013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total consumer lending</td><td>$ 2041</td><td>$ 2161</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total commercial lending</td><td>542</td><td>578</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total tdrs</td><td>$ 2583</td><td>$ 2739</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>nonperforming</td><td>$ 1370</td><td>$ 1511</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accruing ( a )</td><td>1083</td><td>1062</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>credit card</td><td>130</td><td>166</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total tdrs</td><td>$ 2583</td><td>$ 2739</td></tr></table> ( a ) accruing tdr loans have demonstrated a period of at least six months of performance under the restructured terms and are excluded from nonperforming loans . loans where borrowers have been discharged from personal liability through chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligations to pnc and loans to borrowers not currently obligated to make both principal and interest payments under the restructured terms are not returned to accrual status . table 68 quantifies the number of loans that were classified as tdrs as well as the change in the recorded investments as a result of the tdr classification during 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , respectively . additionally , the table provides information about the types of tdr concessions . the principal forgiveness tdr category includes principal forgiveness and accrued interest forgiveness . these types of tdrs result in a write down of the recorded investment and a charge-off if such action has not already taken place . the rate reduction tdr category includes reduced interest rate and interest deferral . the tdrs within this category result in reductions to future interest income . the other tdr category primarily includes consumer borrowers that have been discharged from personal liability through chapter 7 bankruptcy and have not formally reaffirmed their loan obligations to pnc , as well as postponement/reduction of scheduled amortization and contractual extensions for both consumer and commercial borrowers . in some cases , there have been multiple concessions granted on one loan . this is most common within the commercial loan portfolio . when there have been multiple concessions granted in the commercial loan portfolio , the principal forgiveness concession was prioritized for purposes of determining the inclusion in table 68 . for example , if there is principal forgiveness in conjunction with lower interest rate and postponement of amortization , the type of concession will be reported as principal forgiveness . second in priority would be rate reduction . for example , if there is an interest rate reduction in conjunction with postponement of amortization , the type of concession will be reported as a rate reduction . in the event that multiple concessions are granted on a consumer loan , concessions resulting from discharge from personal liability through chapter 7 bankruptcy without formal affirmation of the loan obligations to pnc would be prioritized and included in the other type of concession in the table below . after that , consumer loan concessions would follow the previously discussed priority of concessions for the commercial loan portfolio . 138 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .\nQuestion: what were specific reserves in 2013?\nAnswer: 0.5\nQuestion: what were they in 2014?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.4"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8061
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfixed-price purchase options available in the leases could potentially provide benefits to us ; however , these benefits are not expected to be significant . we maintain and operate the assets based on contractual obligations within the lease arrangements , which set specific guidelines consistent within the railroad industry . as such , we have no control over activities that could materially impact the fair value of the leased assets . we do not hold the power to direct the activities of the vies and , therefore , do not control the ongoing activities that have a significant impact on the economic performance of the vies . additionally , we do not have the obligation to absorb losses of the vies or the right to receive benefits of the vies that could potentially be significant to the we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate these vies because our actions and decisions do not have the most significant effect on the vie 2019s performance and our fixed-price purchase price options are not considered to be potentially significant to the vie 2019s . the future minimum lease payments associated with the vie leases totaled $ 3.6 billion as of december 31 , 2012 . 16 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 included $ 2467 million , net of $ 966 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2458 million , net of $ 915 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2012 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capitalleases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 525</td><td>$ 282</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>466</td><td>265</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>410</td><td>253</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>375</td><td>232</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2017</td><td>339</td><td>243</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>2126</td><td>1166</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum leasepayments</td><td>$ 4241</td><td>$ 2441</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-593 ( 593 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum leasepayments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1848</td></tr></table> approximately 94% ( 94 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 631 million in 2012 , $ 637 million in 2011 , and $ 624 million in 2010 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant . 17 . commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries . we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity ; however , to the extent possible , where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated , we have recorded a liability . we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages .\nQuestion: what are total minimum payments for operating leases?\nAnswer: 4241.0\nQuestion: what is the total minimum payments for capital leases?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "2441.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6950
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nchanges in our performance retention awards during 2009 were as follows : shares ( thous. ) weighted-average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares ( thous. )</td><td>weighted-averagegrant-date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at january 1 2009</td><td>873</td><td>$ 50.70</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>449</td><td>47.28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-240 ( 240 )</td><td>43.23</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-22 ( 22 )</td><td>53.86</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2009</td><td>1060</td><td>$ 50.88</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 22 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years . a portion of this expense is subject to achievement of the roic levels established for the performance stock unit grants . 5 . retirement plans pension and other postretirement benefits pension plans 2013 we provide defined benefit retirement income to eligible non-union employees through qualified and non-qualified ( supplemental ) pension plans . qualified and non-qualified pension benefits are based on years of service and the highest compensation during the latest years of employment , with specific reductions made for early retirements . other postretirement benefits ( opeb ) 2013 we provide defined contribution medical and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees . these benefits are funded as medical claims and life insurance premiums are plan amendment effective january 1 , 2010 , medicare-eligible retirees who are enrolled in the union pacific retiree medical program will receive a contribution to a health reimbursement account , which can be used to pay eligible out-of-pocket medical expenses . the impact of the plan amendment is reflected in the projected benefit obligation ( pbo ) at december 31 , 2009 . funded status we are required by gaap to separately recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our pension and opeb plans as an asset or liability . the funded status represents the difference between the pbo and the fair value of the plan assets . the pbo is the present value of benefits earned to date by plan participants , including the effect of assumed future salary increases . the pbo of the opeb plan is equal to the accumulated benefit obligation , as the present value of the opeb liabilities is not affected by salary increases . plan assets are measured at fair value . we use a december 31 measurement date for plan assets and obligations for all our retirement plans. .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2009, what was the number of non-vested shares?\nAnswer: 1060000.0\nQuestion: and what was the remaining compensation expense for the unvested awards?\nAnswer: 22000000.0\nQuestion: how much, then, does this expense represent in relation to that number of shares?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "20.75472"
}
] |
CONVFINQA714
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npotentially responsible parties , and existing technology , laws , and regulations . the ultimate liability for remediation is difficult to determine because of the number of potentially responsible parties involved , site- specific cost sharing arrangements with other potentially responsible parties , the degree of contamination by various wastes , the scarcity and quality of volumetric data related to many of the sites , and the speculative nature of remediation costs . current obligations are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use third-party actuaries to assist us with measuring the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work . annual expenses for personal injury-related events were $ 240 million in 2006 , $ 247 million in 2005 , and $ 288 million in 2004 . as of december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had accrued liabilities of $ 631 million and $ 619 million for future personal injury costs , respectively , of which $ 233 million and $ 274 million was recorded in current liabilities as accrued casualty costs , respectively . our personal injury liability is discounted to present value using applicable u.s . treasury rates . approximately 87% ( 87 % ) of the recorded liability related to asserted claims , and approximately 13% ( 13 % ) related to unasserted claims . estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation . our personal injury claims activity was as follows : claims activity 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>claims activity</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>open claims beginning balance</td><td>4197</td><td>4028</td><td>4085</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>new claims</td><td>4190</td><td>4584</td><td>4366</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>settled or dismissed claims</td><td>-4261 ( 4261 )</td><td>-4415 ( 4415 )</td><td>-4423 ( 4423 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>open claims ending balance at december 31</td><td>4126</td><td>4197</td><td>4028</td></tr></table> depreciation 2013 the railroad industry is capital intensive . properties are carried at cost . provisions for depreciation are computed principally on the straight-line method based on estimated service lives of depreciable property . the lives are calculated using a separate composite annual percentage rate for each depreciable property group , based on the results of internal depreciation studies . we are required to submit a report on depreciation studies and proposed depreciation rates to the stb for review and approval every three years for equipment property and every six years for road property . the cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable railroad property retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation , and no gain or loss is recognized . a gain or loss is recognized in other income for all other property upon disposition because the gain or loss is not part of rail operations . the cost of internally developed software is capitalized and amortized over a five-year period . significant capital spending in recent years increased the total value of our depreciable assets . cash capital spending totaled $ 2.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , depreciation expense was $ 1.2 billion . we use various methods to estimate useful lives for each group of depreciable property . due to the capital intensive nature of the business and the large base of depreciable assets , variances to those estimates could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements . if the estimated useful lives of all depreciable assets were increased by one year , annual depreciation expense would decrease by approximately $ 43 million . if the estimated useful lives of all assets to be depreciated were decreased by one year , annual depreciation expense would increase by approximately $ 45 million . income taxes 2013 as required under fasb statement no . 109 , accounting for income taxes , we account for income taxes by recording taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns . these .\nQuestion: what was the value of open claims at the end of 2005?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "4197.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6572
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) funding deposits : we provide products and services including custody , accounting , administration , daily pricing , foreign exchange services , cash management , financial asset management , securities finance and investment advisory services . as a provider of these products and services , we generate client deposits , which have generally provided a stable , low-cost source of funds . as a global custodian , clients place deposits with state street entities in various currencies . we invest these client deposits in a combination of investment securities and short- duration financial instruments whose mix is determined by the characteristics of the deposits . for the past several years , we have experienced higher client deposit inflows toward the end of the quarter or the end of the year . as a result , we believe average client deposit balances are more reflective of ongoing funding than period-end balances . table 33 : client deposits average balance december 31 , year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>client deposits ( 1 )</td><td>$ 195276</td><td>$ 182268</td><td>$ 167470</td><td>$ 143043</td></tr></table> client deposits ( 1 ) $ 195276 $ 182268 $ 167470 $ 143043 ( 1 ) balance as of december 31 , 2014 excluded term wholesale certificates of deposit , or cds , of $ 13.76 billion ; average balances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 excluded average cds of $ 6.87 billion and $ 2.50 billion , respectively . short-term funding : our corporate commercial paper program , under which we can issue up to $ 3.0 billion of commercial paper with original maturities of up to 270 days from the date of issuance , had $ 2.48 billion and $ 1.82 billion of commercial paper outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . our on-balance sheet liquid assets are also an integral component of our liquidity management strategy . these assets provide liquidity through maturities of the assets , but more importantly , they provide us with the ability to raise funds by pledging the securities as collateral for borrowings or through outright sales . in addition , our access to the global capital markets gives us the ability to source incremental funding at reasonable rates of interest from wholesale investors . as discussed earlier under 201casset liquidity , 201d state street bank's membership in the fhlb allows for advances of liquidity with varying terms against high-quality collateral . short-term secured funding also comes in the form of securities lent or sold under agreements to repurchase . these transactions are short-term in nature , generally overnight , and are collateralized by high-quality investment securities . these balances were $ 8.93 billion and $ 7.95 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . state street bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of cad $ 800 million , or approximately $ 690 million as of december 31 , 2014 , to support its canadian securities processing operations . the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice . as of december 31 , 2014 , there was no balance outstanding on this line of credit . long-term funding : as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank had board authority to issue unsecured senior debt securities from time to time , provided that the aggregate principal amount of such unsecured senior debt outstanding at any one time does not exceed $ 5 billion . as of december 31 , 2014 , $ 4.1 billion was available for issuance pursuant to this authority . as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank also had board authority to issue an additional $ 500 million of subordinated debt . we maintain an effective universal shelf registration that allows for the public offering and sale of debt securities , capital securities , common stock , depositary shares and preferred stock , and warrants to purchase such securities , including any shares into which the preferred stock and depositary shares may be convertible , or any combination thereof . we have issued in the past , and we may issue in the future , securities pursuant to our shelf registration . the issuance of debt or equity securities will depend on future market conditions , funding needs and other factors . agency credit ratings our ability to maintain consistent access to liquidity is fostered by the maintenance of high investment-grade ratings as measured by the major independent credit rating agencies . factors essential to maintaining high credit ratings include diverse and stable core earnings ; relative market position ; strong risk management ; strong capital ratios ; diverse liquidity sources , including the global capital markets and client deposits ; strong liquidity monitoring procedures ; and preparedness for current or future regulatory developments . high ratings limit borrowing costs and enhance our liquidity by providing assurance for unsecured funding and depositors , increasing the potential market for our debt and improving our ability to offer products , serve markets , and engage in transactions in which clients value high credit ratings . a downgrade or reduction of our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity by restricting our ability to access the capital .\nQuestion: what is the net change in deposits of clients from 2013 to 2014?\nAnswer: 13008.0\nQuestion: what growth rate does this represent?\nAnswer: 0.07137\nQuestion: what is the net change in average cds that were excluded between 2013 and 2014?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "4.37"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1972
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nbhge 2017 form 10-k | 27 the short term . we do , however , view the long term economics of the lng industry as positive given our outlook for supply and demand . 2022 refinery , petrochemical and industrial projects : in refining , we believe large , complex refineries should gain advantage in a more competitive , oversupplied landscape in 2018 as the industry globalizes and refiners position to meet local demand and secure export potential . in petrochemicals , we continue to see healthy demand and cost-advantaged supply driving projects forward in 2018 . the industrial market continues to grow as outdated infrastructure is replaced , policy changes come into effect and power is decentralized . we continue to see growing demand across these markets in 2018 . we have other segments in our portfolio that are more correlated with different industrial metrics such as our digital solutions business . overall , we believe our portfolio is uniquely positioned to compete across the value chain , and deliver unique solutions for our customers . we remain optimistic about the long-term economics of the industry , but are continuing to operate with flexibility given our expectations for volatility and changing assumptions in the near term . in 2016 , solar and wind net additions exceeded coal and gas for the first time and it continued throughout 2017 . governments may change or may not continue incentives for renewable energy additions . in the long term , renewables' cost decline may accelerate to compete with new-built fossil capacity , however , we do not anticipate any significant impacts to our business in the foreseeable future . despite the near-term volatility , the long-term outlook for our industry remains strong . we believe the world 2019s demand for energy will continue to rise , and the supply of energy will continue to increase in complexity , requiring greater service intensity and more advanced technology from oilfield service companies . as such , we remain focused on delivering innovative cost-efficient solutions that deliver step changes in operating and economic performance for our customers . business environment the following discussion and analysis summarizes the significant factors affecting our results of operations , financial condition and liquidity position as of and for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated and combined financial statements and related notes of the company . amounts reported in millions in graphs within this report are computed based on the amounts in hundreds . as a result , the sum of the components reported in millions may not equal the total amount reported in millions due to rounding . we operate in more than 120 countries helping customers find , evaluate , drill , produce , transport and process hydrocarbon resources . our revenue is predominately generated from the sale of products and services to major , national , and independent oil and natural gas companies worldwide , and is dependent on spending by our customers for oil and natural gas exploration , field development and production . this spending is driven by a number of factors , including our customers' forecasts of future energy demand and supply , their access to resources to develop and produce oil and natural gas , their ability to fund their capital programs , the impact of new government regulations and most importantly , their expectations for oil and natural gas prices as a key driver of their cash flows . oil and natural gas prices oil and natural gas prices are summarized in the table below as averages of the daily closing prices during each of the periods indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>brent oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 1 )</td><td>$ 54.12</td><td>$ 43.64</td><td>$ 52.32</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 )</td><td>50.80</td><td>43.29</td><td>48.66</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 )</td><td>2.99</td><td>2.52</td><td>2.62</td></tr></table> brent oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 1 ) $ 54.12 $ 43.64 $ 52.32 wti oil prices ( $ /bbl ) ( 2 ) 50.80 43.29 48.66 natural gas prices ( $ /mmbtu ) ( 3 ) 2.99 2.52 2.62 ( 1 ) energy information administration ( eia ) europe brent spot price per barrel .\nQuestion: what was the value of brent oil prices in 2017?\nAnswer: 54.12\nQuestion: what was the value in 2016?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "43.64"
}
] |
CONVFINQA5165
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncomparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph compares the cumulative total return on citigroup 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period extending through december 31 , 2009 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in citigroup 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index and that all dividends were reinvested . citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31</td><td>citigroup</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>s&p financial index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2005</td><td>104.38</td><td>104.83</td><td>106.30</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2006</td><td>124.02</td><td>121.20</td><td>126.41</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2007</td><td>70.36</td><td>127.85</td><td>103.47</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2008</td><td>18.71</td><td>81.12</td><td>47.36</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2009</td><td>9.26</td><td>102.15</td><td>55.27</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the value of an investment in citigroup in 2009?\nAnswer: 9.26\nQuestion: what about the initial value of the investment?\nAnswer: 100.0\nQuestion: what is the change in value?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "-90.74"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6724
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/28/02</td><td>1/3/04</td><td>1/1/05</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/30/06</td><td>12/29/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.92</td><td>113.38</td><td>138.92</td><td>147.04</td><td>139.82</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s & p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.75</td><td>164.64</td><td>168.60</td><td>187.83</td><td>205.22</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s & p information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>147.23</td><td>150.99</td><td>152.49</td><td>165.32</td><td>192.28</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .\nQuestion: what was the stock price of cadence design systems in 2007?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "139.82"
}
] |
CONVFINQA7743
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following details the impairment charge resulting from our review ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year ended may 31 2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 136800</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trademark</td><td>10000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other long-lived assets</td><td>864</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 147664</td></tr></table> net income attributable to noncontrolling interests , net of tax noncontrolling interest , net of tax increased $ 28.9 million from $ 8.1 million fiscal 2008 . the increase was primarily related to our acquisition of a 51% ( 51 % ) majority interest in hsbc merchant services , llp on june 30 , net income attributable to global payments and diluted earnings per share during fiscal 2009 we reported net income of $ 37.2 million ( $ 0.46 diluted earnings per share ) . liquidity and capital resources a significant portion of our liquidity comes from operating cash flows , which are generally sufficient to fund operations , planned capital expenditures , debt service and various strategic investments in our business . cash flow from operations is used to make planned capital investments in our business , to pursue acquisitions that meet our corporate objectives , to pay dividends , and to pay off debt and repurchase our shares at the discretion of our board of directors . accumulated cash balances are invested in high-quality and marketable short term instruments . our capital plan objectives are to support the company 2019s operational needs and strategic plan for long term growth while maintaining a low cost of capital . lines of credit are used in certain of our markets to fund settlement and as a source of working capital and , along with other bank financing , to fund acquisitions . we regularly evaluate our liquidity and capital position relative to cash requirements , and we may elect to raise additional funds in the future , either through the issuance of debt , equity or otherwise . at may 31 , 2010 , we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $ 769.9 million . of this amount , we consider $ 268.1 million to be available cash , which generally excludes settlement related and merchant reserve cash balances . settlement related cash balances represent surplus funds that we hold on behalf of our member sponsors when the incoming amount from the card networks precedes the member sponsors 2019 funding obligation to the merchant . merchant reserve cash balances represent funds collected from our merchants that serve as collateral ( 201cmerchant reserves 201d ) to minimize contingent liabilities associated with any losses that may occur under the merchant agreement . at may 31 , 2010 , our cash and cash equivalents included $ 199.4 million related to merchant reserves . while this cash is not restricted in its use , we believe that designating this cash to collateralize merchant reserves strengthens our fiduciary standing with our member sponsors and is in accordance with the guidelines set by the card networks . see cash and cash equivalents and settlement processing assets and obligations under note 1 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional details . net cash provided by operating activities increased $ 82.8 million to $ 465.8 million for fiscal 2010 from the prior year . income from continuing operations increased $ 16.0 million and we had cash provided by changes in working capital of $ 60.2 million . the working capital change was primarily due to the change in net settlement processing assets and obligations of $ 80.3 million and the change in accounts receivable of $ 13.4 million , partially offset by the change .\nQuestion: as of may 31, 2009, how much did the goodwill amount represent in relation to the total impairment charge?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.92643"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4152
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nj.p . morgan chase & co . / 2003 annual report 65 the commercial specific loss component of the allowance was $ 917 million at december 31 , 2003 , a decrease of 43% ( 43 % ) from year-end 2002 . the decrease was attributable to the improve- ment in the credit quality of the commercial loan portfolio , as well as the reduction in the size of the portfolio . the commercial expected loss component of the allowance was $ 454 million at december 31 , 2003 , a decrease of 26% ( 26 % ) from year- end 2002 . the decrease reflected an improvement in the average quality of the loan portfolio , as well as the improving credit envi- ronment , which affected inputs to the expected loss model . the consumer expected loss component of the allowance was $ 2.3 billion at december 31 , 2003 , a decrease of 4% ( 4 % ) from year- end 2002 . although the consumer managed loan portfolio increased by 10% ( 10 % ) , the businesses that drove the increase , home finance and auto finance , have collateralized products with lower expected loss rates . the residual component of the allowance was $ 895 million at december 31 , 2003 . the residual component , which incorpo- rates management's judgment , addresses uncertainties that are not considered in the formula-based commercial specific and expected components of the allowance for credit losses . the $ 121 million increase addressed uncertainties in the eco- nomic environment and concentrations in the commercial loan portfolio that existed during the first half of 2003 . in the sec- ond half of the year , as commercial credit quality continued to improve and the commercial allowance declined further , the residual component was reduced as well . at december 31 , 2003 , the residual component represented approximately 20% ( 20 % ) of the total allowance for loan losses , within the firm 2019s target range of between 10% ( 10 % ) and 20% ( 20 % ) . the firm anticipates that if the current positive trend in economic conditions and credit quality continues , the commercial and residual components will continue to be reduced . lending-related commitments to provide for the risk of loss inherent in the credit-extension process , management also computes specific and expected loss components as well as a residual component for commercial lending 2013related commitments . this is computed using a methodology similar to that used for the commercial loan port- folio , modified for expected maturities and probabilities of drawdown . the allowance decreased by 11% ( 11 % ) to $ 324 million as of december 31 , 2003 , due to improvement in the criticized portion of the firm 2019s lending-related commitments . credit costs . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>for the year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>for the year ended december 31 commercial</td><td>for the year ended december 31 consumer</td><td>for the year ended december 31 residual</td><td>for the year ended december 31 total</td><td>for the year ended december 31 commercial</td><td>for the year ended december 31 consumer</td><td>residual</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>provision for loan losses</td><td>$ -30 ( 30 )</td><td>$ 1491</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 1579</td><td>$ 2371</td><td>$ 1589</td><td>$ 79</td><td>$ 4039</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>provision for lending-related commitments</td><td>-47 ( 47 )</td><td>2014</td><td>8</td><td>-39 ( 39 )</td><td>309</td><td>2014</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td><td>292</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>securitized credit losses</td><td>2014</td><td>1870</td><td>2014</td><td>1870</td><td>2014</td><td>1439</td><td>2014</td><td>1439</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total managed credit costs</td><td>$ -77 ( 77 )</td><td>$ 3361</td><td>$ 126</td><td>$ 3410</td><td>$ 2680</td><td>$ 3028</td><td>$ 62</td><td>$ 5770</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: how much, in percentage, is the consumer expected loss allowance in 2003 in relation to the consumer expected loss allowance in 2002, considering the percentage decrease over the year?\nAnswer: 96.0\nQuestion: and what is the numerical representation of that percentage?\nAnswer: 0.96\nQuestion: considering the consumer expected loss allowance in 2003 and its value as a part of the 2002 one, what can be concluded to be the 2002 consumer expected loss allowance, in billions?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "2.39583"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1286
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nwestrock company notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 20 . stockholders 2019 equity capitalization our capital stock consists solely of common stock . holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share . our amended and restated certificate of incorporation also authorizes preferred stock , of which no shares have been issued . the terms and provisions of such shares will be determined by our board of directors upon any issuance of such shares in accordance with our certificate of incorporation . stock repurchase plan in july 2015 , our board of directors authorized a repurchase program of up to 40.0 million shares of our common stock , representing approximately 15% ( 15 % ) of our outstanding common stock as of july 1 , 2015 . the shares of our common stock may be repurchased over an indefinite period of time at the discretion of management . in fiscal 2019 , we repurchased approximately 2.1 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 88.6 million . in fiscal 2018 , we repurchased approximately 3.4 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 195.1 million . in fiscal 2017 , we repurchased approximately 1.8 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 93.0 million . as of september 30 , 2019 , we had remaining authorization under the repurchase program authorized in july 2015 to purchase approximately 19.1 million shares of our common stock . note 21 . share-based compensation share-based compensation plans at our annual meeting of stockholders held on february 2 , 2016 , our stockholders approved the westrock company 2016 incentive stock plan . the 2016 incentive stock plan was amended and restated on february 2 , 2018 ( the 201camended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan 201d ) . the amended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan allows for the granting of options , restricted stock , sars and restricted stock units to certain key employees and directors . the table below shows the approximate number of shares : available for issuance , available for future grant , to be issued if restricted awards granted with a performance condition recorded at target achieve the maximum award , and if new grants pursuant to the plan are expected to be issued , each as adjusted as necessary for corporate actions ( in millions ) . shares available issuance shares available for future shares to be issued if performance is achieved at maximum expect to awards amended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan ( 1 ) 11.7 5.1 2.3 yes 2004 incentive stock plan ( 1 ) ( 2 ) 15.8 3.1 0.0 no 2005 performance incentive plan ( 1 ) ( 2 ) 12.8 9.0 0.0 no rocktenn ( sscc ) equity inventive plan ( 1 ) ( 3 ) 7.9 5.9 0.0 no ( 1 ) as part of the separation , equity-based incentive awards were generally adjusted to maintain the intrinsic value of awards immediately prior to the separation . the number of unvested restricted stock awards and unexercised stock options and sars at the time of the separation were increased by an exchange factor of approximately 1.12 . in addition , the exercise price of unexercised stock options and sars at the time of the separation was converted to decrease the exercise price by an exchange factor of approximately 1.12 . ( 2 ) in connection with the combination , westrock assumed all rocktenn and mwv equity incentive plans . we issued awards to certain key employees and our directors pursuant to our rocktenn 2004 incentive stock plan , as amended , and our mwv 2005 performance incentive plan , as amended . the awards were converted into westrock awards using the conversion factor as described in the business combination agreement . ( 3 ) in connection with the smurfit-stone acquisition , we assumed the smurfit-stone equity incentive plan , which was renamed the rock-tenn company ( sscc ) equity incentive plan . the awards were converted into shares of rocktenn common stock , options and restricted stock units , as applicable , using the conversion factor as described in the merger agreement. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares available for issuance</td><td>shares available for future grant</td><td>shares to be issued if performance is achieved at maximum</td><td>expect to make new awards</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>amended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan ( 1 )</td><td>11.7</td><td>5.1</td><td>2.3</td><td>yes</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2004 incentive stock plan ( 1 ) ( 2 )</td><td>15.8</td><td>3.1</td><td>0.0</td><td>no</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2005 performance incentive plan ( 1 ) ( 2 )</td><td>12.8</td><td>9.0</td><td>0.0</td><td>no</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rocktenn ( sscc ) equity inventive plan ( 1 ) ( 3 )</td><td>7.9</td><td>5.9</td><td>0.0</td><td>no</td></tr></table> westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 20 . stockholders 2019 equity capitalization our capital stock consists solely of common stock . holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share . our amended and restated certificate of incorporation also authorizes preferred stock , of which no shares have been issued . the terms and provisions of such shares will be determined by our board of directors upon any issuance of such shares in accordance with our certificate of incorporation . stock repurchase plan in july 2015 , our board of directors authorized a repurchase program of up to 40.0 million shares of our common stock , representing approximately 15% ( 15 % ) of our outstanding common stock as of july 1 , 2015 . the shares of our common stock may be repurchased over an indefinite period of time at the discretion of management . in fiscal 2019 , we repurchased approximately 2.1 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 88.6 million . in fiscal 2018 , we repurchased approximately 3.4 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 195.1 million . in fiscal 2017 , we repurchased approximately 1.8 million shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 93.0 million . as of september 30 , 2019 , we had remaining authorization under the repurchase program authorized in july 2015 to purchase approximately 19.1 million shares of our common stock . note 21 . share-based compensation share-based compensation plans at our annual meeting of stockholders held on february 2 , 2016 , our stockholders approved the westrock company 2016 incentive stock plan . the 2016 incentive stock plan was amended and restated on february 2 , 2018 ( the 201camended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan 201d ) . the amended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan allows for the granting of options , restricted stock , sars and restricted stock units to certain key employees and directors . the table below shows the approximate number of shares : available for issuance , available for future grant , to be issued if restricted awards granted with a performance condition recorded at target achieve the maximum award , and if new grants pursuant to the plan are expected to be issued , each as adjusted as necessary for corporate actions ( in millions ) . shares available issuance shares available for future shares to be issued if performance is achieved at maximum expect to awards amended and restated 2016 incentive stock plan ( 1 ) 11.7 5.1 2.3 yes 2004 incentive stock plan ( 1 ) ( 2 ) 15.8 3.1 0.0 no 2005 performance incentive plan ( 1 ) ( 2 ) 12.8 9.0 0.0 no rocktenn ( sscc ) equity inventive plan ( 1 ) ( 3 ) 7.9 5.9 0.0 no ( 1 ) as part of the separation , equity-based incentive awards were generally adjusted to maintain the intrinsic value of awards immediately prior to the separation . the number of unvested restricted stock awards and unexercised stock options and sars at the time of the separation were increased by an exchange factor of approximately 1.12 . in addition , the exercise price of unexercised stock options and sars at the time of the separation was converted to decrease the exercise price by an exchange factor of approximately 1.12 . ( 2 ) in connection with the combination , westrock assumed all rocktenn and mwv equity incentive plans . we issued awards to certain key employees and our directors pursuant to our rocktenn 2004 incentive stock plan , as amended , and our mwv 2005 performance incentive plan , as amended . the awards were converted into westrock awards using the conversion factor as described in the business combination agreement . ( 3 ) in connection with the smurfit-stone acquisition , we assumed the smurfit-stone equity incentive plan , which was renamed the rock-tenn company ( sscc ) equity incentive plan . the awards were converted into shares of rocktenn common stock , options and restricted stock units , as applicable , using the conversion factor as described in the merger agreement. .\nQuestion: what is the sum of the number of shares repurchased in 2018 and 2019?\nAnswer: 5.5\nQuestion: what is the number of repurchases in 2017?\nAnswer: 1.8\nQuestion: what is the sum of those years?\nAnswer: 7.3\nQuestion: what is the sum of the aggregate value of the repurchases in 2018 and 2019?\nAnswer: 283.7\nQuestion: what is the sum including the value in 2017?\nAnswer: 376.7\nQuestion: what is the ratio of total value over the total number of shares?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "51.60274"
}
] |
CONVFINQA3680
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) | 72 snap-on incorporated following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits : ( amounts in millions ) amount . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions )</td><td>amount</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 2006</td><td>$ 21.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases 2013 tax positions in prior periods</td><td>0.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross decreases 2013 tax positions in prior periods</td><td>-0.4 ( 0.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross increases 2013 tax positions in the current period</td><td>0.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-3.0 ( 3.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapsing of statutes of limitations</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>unrecognized tax benefits as of december 29 2007</td><td>$ 18.7</td></tr></table> of the $ 18.7 million of unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2007 , approximately $ 16.2 million would impact the effective income tax rate if recognized . interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in income tax expense . during the years ended december 29 , 2007 , december 30 , 2006 , and december 31 , 2005 , the company recognized approximately $ 1.2 million , $ 0.5 million and ( $ 0.5 ) million in net interest expense ( benefit ) , respectively . the company has provided for approximately $ 3.4 million , $ 2.2 million , and $ 1.7 million of accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits at the end of fiscal year 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . during the next 12 months , the company does not anticipate any significant changes to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits , other than the accrual of additional interest expense in an amount similar to the prior year 2019s expense . with few exceptions , snap-on is no longer subject to u.s . federal and state/local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2003 , and snap-on is no longer subject to non-u.s . income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2001 . the undistributed earnings of all non-u.s . subsidiaries totaled $ 338.5 million , $ 247.4 million and $ 173.6 million at the end of fiscal 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . snap-on has not provided any deferred taxes on these undistributed earnings as it considers the undistributed earnings to be permanently invested . determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred income tax liability related to these earnings is not practicable . the american jobs creation act of 2004 ( the 201cajca 201d ) created a one-time tax incentive for u.s . corporations to repatriate accumulated foreign earnings by providing a tax deduction of 85% ( 85 % ) of qualifying dividends received from foreign affiliates . under the provisions of the ajca , snap-on repatriated approximately $ 93 million of qualifying dividends in 2005 that resulted in additional income tax expense of $ 3.3 million for the year . note 9 : short-term and long-term debt notes payable and long-term debt as of december 29 , 2007 , was $ 517.9 million ; no commercial paper was outstanding at december 29 , 2007 . as of december 30 , 2006 , notes payable and long-term debt was $ 549.2 million , including $ 314.9 million of commercial paper . snap-on presented $ 300 million of the december 30 , 2006 , outstanding commercial paper as 201clong-term debt 201d on the accompanying december 30 , 2006 , consolidated balance sheet . on january 12 , 2007 , snap-on sold $ 300 million of unsecured notes consisting of $ 150 million of floating rate notes that mature on january 12 , 2010 , and $ 150 million of fixed rate notes that mature on january 15 , 2017 . interest on the floating rate notes accrues at a rate equal to the three-month london interbank offer rate plus 0.13% ( 0.13 % ) per year and is payable quarterly . interest on the fixed rate notes accrues at a rate of 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) per year and is payable semi-annually . snap-on used the proceeds from the sale of the notes , net of $ 1.5 million of transaction costs , to repay commercial paper obligations issued to finance the acquisition of business solutions . on january 12 , 2007 , the company also terminated a $ 250 million bridge credit agreement that snap-on established prior to its acquisition of business solutions. .\nQuestion: what is the change in balance of the unrecognized tax benefits from 2006 to 2007?\nAnswer: -2.6\nQuestion: what is the balance of the unrecognized tax benefits in 2006?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "21.3"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6183
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents interest expense , net of capitalized interest increased $ 64 million , or 9.8% ( 9.8 % ) , to $ 710 million in 2013 from $ 646 million in 2012 primarily due to special charges of $ 92 million to recognize post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations pursuant to the plan and penalty interest related to 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) secured notes and 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes . other nonoperating expense , net of $ 84 million in 2013 consists principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 55 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 48 million . other nonoperating income in 2012 consisted principally of a $ 280 million special credit related to the settlement of a commercial dispute partially offset by net foreign currency losses . reorganization items , net reorganization items refer to revenues , expenses ( including professional fees ) , realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred as a direct result of the chapter 11 cases . the following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items , net on american 2019s consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pension and postretirement benefits</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -66 ( 66 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>labor-related deemed claim ( 1 )</td><td>1733</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>320</td><td>1951</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fair value of conversion discount ( 4 )</td><td>218</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>professional fees</td><td>199</td><td>227</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>170</td><td>67</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total reorganization items net</td><td>$ 2640</td><td>$ 2179</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in exchange for employees 2019 contributions to the successful reorganization , including agreeing to reductions in pay and benefits , american agreed in the plan to provide each employee group a deemed claim , which was used to provide a distribution of a portion of the equity of the reorganized entity to those employees . each employee group received a deemed claim amount based upon a portion of the value of cost savings provided by that group through reductions to pay and benefits as well as through certain work rule changes . the total value of this deemed claim was approximately $ 1.7 billion . ( 2 ) amounts include allowed claims ( claims approved by the bankruptcy court ) and estimated allowed claims relating to ( i ) the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft and ( ii ) entry of orders treated as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds . the debtors recorded an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing or facility agreement when the applicable motion was filed with the bankruptcy court to reject or modify such financing or facility agreement and the debtors believed that it was probable the motion would be approved , and there was sufficient information to estimate the claim . see note 2 to american 2019s consolidated financial statements in part ii , item 8b for further information . ( 3 ) pursuant to the plan , the debtors agreed to allow certain post-petition unsecured claims on obligations . as a result , during the year ended december 31 , 2013 , american recorded reorganization charges to adjust estimated allowed claim amounts previously recorded on rejected special facility revenue bonds of $ 180 million , allowed general unsecured claims related to the 1990 and 1994 series of special facility revenue bonds that financed certain improvements at jfk , and rejected bonds that financed certain improvements at ord , which are included in the table above . ( 4 ) the plan allowed unsecured creditors receiving aag series a preferred stock a conversion discount of 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) . accordingly , american recorded the fair value of such discount upon the confirmation of the plan by the bankruptcy court. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in the total reorganization items net between 2012 and 2013?\nAnswer: 461.0\nQuestion: so what was the percentage growth during this time?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.21156"
}
] |
CONVFINQA3495
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 201cs&p industrials index 201d ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 201cs&p consumer durables & apparel index 201d ) , from december 31 , 2005 through december 31 , 2010 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 12.66 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2005 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . performance graph 201020092008200720062005 s&p 500 index s&p industrials index s&p consumer durables & apparel index the table below sets forth the value , as of december 31 for each of the years indicated , of a $ 100 investment made on december 31 , 2005 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p industrials index and the s&p consumer durables & apparel index and includes the reinvestment of dividends. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2007</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>masco</td><td>$ 101.79</td><td>$ 76.74</td><td>$ 42.81</td><td>$ 54.89</td><td>$ 51.51</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 115.61</td><td>$ 121.95</td><td>$ 77.38</td><td>$ 97.44</td><td>$ 111.89</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p industrials index</td><td>$ 113.16</td><td>$ 126.72</td><td>$ 76.79</td><td>$ 92.30</td><td>$ 116.64</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p consumer durables & apparel index</td><td>$ 106.16</td><td>$ 84.50</td><td>$ 56.13</td><td>$ 76.51</td><td>$ 99.87</td></tr></table> in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise . at december 31 , 2010 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 27 million shares . during 2010 , we repurchased and retired three million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 45 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2010 grant of three million shares of long-term stock awards . we did not purchase any shares during the three months ended december 31 , 2010. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the performance price of the masco common stock in the five year period ended 2010?\nAnswer: -48.49\nQuestion: and what is this change as a percentage of that price in 2006?\nAnswer: -0.4849\nQuestion: in the last year of that period, what percentage of the shares authorized to purchase in open-market transactions or otherwise by the board of directors in 2007 were part of the remaining authorization?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.54"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10379
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nadobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2014 and 2013 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 136098</td><td>$ 160468</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions</td><td>144</td><td>20244</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions</td><td>18877</td><td>16777</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-995 ( 995 )</td><td>-55851 ( 55851 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-1630 ( 1630 )</td><td>-4066 ( 4066 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>foreign exchange gains and losses</td><td>-3646 ( 3646 )</td><td>-1474 ( 1474 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 148848</td><td>$ 136098</td></tr></table> as of november 28 , 2014 , the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns and included in non-current income taxes payable was approximately $ 14.6 million . we file income tax returns in the u.s . on a federal basis and in many u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities . our major tax jurisdictions are ireland , california and the u.s . for ireland , california and the u.s. , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2008 , 2008 and 2010 , respectively . we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from the current examinations . we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position . in july 2013 , a u.s . income tax examination covering fiscal 2008 and 2009 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was $ 48.4 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we settled the tax obligation resulting from this examination with cash and income tax assets totaling $ 41.2 million , and the resulting $ 7.2 million income tax benefit was recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 . the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process . these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance sheet classification of current and non-current assets and liabilities . we believe that within the next 12 months , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both . given the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential decreases in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 5 million . note 10 . restructuring fiscal 2014 restructuring plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 , in order to better align our global resources for digital media and digital marketing , we initiated a restructuring plan to vacate our research and development facility in china and our sales and marketing facility in russia . this plan consisted of reductions of approximately 350 full-time positions and we recorded restructuring charges of approximately $ 18.8 million related to ongoing termination benefits for the positions eliminated . during fiscal 2015 , we intend to vacate both of these facilities . the amount accrued for the fair value of future contractual obligations under these operating leases was insignificant . other restructuring plans during the past several years , we have implemented other restructuring plans consisting of reductions in workforce and the consolidation of facilities to better align our resources around our business strategies . as of november 28 , 2014 , we considered our other restructuring plans to be substantially complete . we continue to make cash outlays to settle obligations under these plans , however the current impact to our consolidated financial statements is not significant. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2013 to 2014?\nAnswer: 12750.0\nQuestion: and how much does this change represent in relation to that gross amount in 2013, in percentage?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.09368"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1128
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart i item 1 . business . general development of business general : altria group , inc . is a holding company incorporated in the commonwealth of virginia in 1985 . at december 31 , 2014 , altria group , inc . 2019s wholly-owned subsidiaries included philip morris usa inc . ( 201cpm usa 201d ) , which is engaged predominantly in the manufacture and sale of cigarettes in the united states ; john middleton co . ( 201cmiddleton 201d ) , which is engaged in the manufacture and sale of machine-made large cigars and pipe tobacco , and is a wholly- owned subsidiary of pm usa ; and ust llc ( 201cust 201d ) , which through its wholly-owned subsidiaries , including u.s . smokeless tobacco company llc ( 201cusstc 201d ) and ste . michelle wine estates ltd . ( 201cste . michelle 201d ) , is engaged in the manufacture and sale of smokeless tobacco products and wine . altria group , inc . 2019s other operating companies included nu mark llc ( 201cnu mark 201d ) , a wholly-owned subsidiary that is engaged in the manufacture and sale of innovative tobacco products , and philip morris capital corporation ( 201cpmcc 201d ) , a wholly-owned subsidiary that maintains a portfolio of finance assets , substantially all of which are leveraged leases . other altria group , inc . wholly-owned subsidiaries included altria group distribution company , which provides sales , distribution and consumer engagement services to certain altria group , inc . operating subsidiaries , and altria client services inc. , which provides various support services , such as legal , regulatory , finance , human resources and external affairs , to altria group , inc . and its subsidiaries . at december 31 , 2014 , altria group , inc . also held approximately 27% ( 27 % ) of the economic and voting interest of sabmiller plc ( 201csabmiller 201d ) , which altria group , inc . accounts for under the equity method of accounting . source of funds : because altria group , inc . is a holding company , its access to the operating cash flows of its wholly- owned subsidiaries consists of cash received from the payment of dividends and distributions , and the payment of interest on intercompany loans by its subsidiaries . at december 31 , 2014 , altria group , inc . 2019s principal wholly-owned subsidiaries were not limited by long-term debt or other agreements in their ability to pay cash dividends or make other distributions with respect to their equity interests . in addition , altria group , inc . receives cash dividends on its interest in sabmiller if and when sabmiller pays such dividends . financial information about segments altria group , inc . 2019s reportable segments are smokeable products , smokeless products and wine . the financial services and the innovative tobacco products businesses are included in an all other category due to the continued reduction of the lease portfolio of pmcc and the relative financial contribution of altria group , inc . 2019s innovative tobacco products businesses to altria group , inc . 2019s consolidated results . altria group , inc . 2019s chief operating decision maker reviews operating companies income to evaluate the performance of , and allocate resources to , the segments . operating companies income for the segments is defined as operating income before amortization of intangibles and general corporate expenses . interest and other debt expense , net , and provision for income taxes are centrally managed at the corporate level and , accordingly , such items are not presented by segment since they are excluded from the measure of segment profitability reviewed by altria group , inc . 2019s chief operating decision maker . net revenues and operating companies income ( together with a reconciliation to earnings before income taxes ) attributable to each such segment for each of the last three years are set forth in note 15 . segment reporting to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data of this annual report on form 10-k ( 201citem 8 201d ) . information about total assets by segment is not disclosed because such information is not reported to or used by altria group , inc . 2019s chief operating decision maker . segment goodwill and other intangible assets , net , are disclosed in note 4 . goodwill and other intangible assets , net to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 ( 201cnote 4 201d ) . the accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in note 2 . summary of significant accounting policies to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 ( 201cnote 2 201d ) . the relative percentages of operating companies income ( loss ) attributable to each reportable segment and the all other category were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>smokeable products</td><td>87.2% ( 87.2 % )</td><td>84.5% ( 84.5 % )</td><td>83.7% ( 83.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>smokeless products</td><td>13.4</td><td>12.2</td><td>12.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>wine</td><td>1.7</td><td>1.4</td><td>1.4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>all other</td><td>-2.3 ( 2.3 )</td><td>1.9</td><td>2.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td></tr></table> for items affecting the comparability of the relative percentages of operating companies income ( loss ) attributable to each reportable segment , see note 15 . segment reporting to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 ( 201cnote 15 201d ) . narrative description of business portions of the information called for by this item are included in item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations - operating results by business segment of this annual report on form 10-k . tobacco space altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco operating companies include pm usa , usstc and other subsidiaries of ust , middleton and nu mark . altria group distribution company provides sales , distribution and consumer engagement services to altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco operating companies . the products of altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco subsidiaries include smokeable tobacco products comprised of cigarettes manufactured and sold by pm usa and machine-made large altria_mdc_2014form10k_nolinks_crops.pdf 3 2/25/15 5:56 pm .\nQuestion: what was operating income related to smokeless products in 2014?\nAnswer: 13.4\nQuestion: what was the value in 2013?\nAnswer: 12.2\nQuestion: what is the net change in value?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1.2"
}
] |
CONVFINQA3460
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhigher average borrowings . additionally , the recapitalization that occurred late in the first quarter of 2005 resulted in a full year of interest in 2006 as compared to approximately ten months in 2005 . the increase in interest expense in 2005 as compared to 2004 also resulted from the recapitalization in 2005 . income tax expense income tax expense totaled $ 150.2 million , $ 116.1 million and $ 118.3 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . this resulted in an effective tax rate of 37.2% ( 37.2 % ) , 37.2% ( 37.2 % ) and 37.6% ( 37.6 % ) for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . net earnings net earnings totaled $ 259.1 million , $ 196.6 and $ 189.4 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , or $ 1.37 , $ 1.53 and $ 1.48 per diluted share , respectively . segment results of operations transaction processing services ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>processing and services revenues</td><td>$ 2458777</td><td>$ 1208430</td><td>$ 892033</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of revenues</td><td>1914148</td><td>904124</td><td>667078</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross profit</td><td>544629</td><td>304306</td><td>224955</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>selling general and administrative expenses</td><td>171106</td><td>94889</td><td>99581</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>research and development costs</td><td>70879</td><td>85702</td><td>54038</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>operating income</td><td>$ 302644</td><td>$ 123715</td><td>$ 71336</td></tr></table> revenues for the transaction processing services segment are derived from three main revenue channels ; enterprise solutions , integrated financial solutions and international . revenues from transaction processing services totaled $ 2458.8 million , $ 1208.4 and $ 892.0 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the overall segment increase of $ 1250.4 million during 2006 , as compared to 2005 was primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 1067.2 million to the overall increase . the majority of the remaining 2006 growth is attributable to organic growth within the historically owned integrated financial solutions and international revenue channels , with international including $ 31.9 million related to the newly formed business process outsourcing operation in brazil . the overall segment increase of $ 316.4 in 2005 as compared to 2004 results from the inclusion of a full year of results for the 2004 acquisitions of aurum , sanchez , kordoba , and intercept , which contributed $ 301.1 million of the increase . cost of revenues for the transaction processing services segment totaled $ 1914.1 million , $ 904.1 million and $ 667.1 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the overall segment increase of $ 1010.0 million during 2006 as compared to 2005 was primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 848.2 million to the increase . gross profit as a percentage of revenues ( 201cgross margin 201d ) was 22.2% ( 22.2 % ) , 25.2% ( 25.2 % ) and 25.2% ( 25.2 % ) for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the decrease in gross profit in 2006 as compared to 2005 is primarily due to the february 1 , 2006 certegy merger , which businesses typically have lower margins than those of the historically owned fis businesses . incremental intangible asset amortization relating to the certegy merger also contributed to the decrease in gross margin . included in cost of revenues was depreciation and amortization of $ 272.4 million , $ 139.8 million , and $ 94.6 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . selling , general and administrative expenses totaled $ 171.1 million , $ 94.9 million and $ 99.6 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the increase in 2006 compared to 2005 is primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 73.7 million to the overall increase of $ 76.2 million . the decrease of $ 4.7 million in 2005 as compared to 2004 is primarily attributable to the effect of acquisition related costs in 2004 . included in selling , general and administrative expenses was depreciation and amortization of $ 11.0 million , $ 9.1 million and $ 2.3 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the total of net earnings in 2006, in thousands?\nAnswer: 259100.0\nQuestion: and what was this amount as a portion of the total of processing and services revenues in that year?\nAnswer: 0.10538\nQuestion: and between that year and the previous, what was the variation in the operating income?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "178929.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA2171
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npage 45 of 100 ball corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 3 . acquisitions latapack-ball embalagens ltda . ( latapack-ball ) in august 2010 , the company paid $ 46.2 million to acquire an additional 10.1 percent economic interest in its brazilian beverage packaging joint venture , latapack-ball , through a transaction with the joint venture partner , latapack s.a . this transaction increased the company 2019s overall economic interest in the joint venture to 60.1 percent and expands and strengthens ball 2019s presence in the growing brazilian market . as a result of the transaction , latapack-ball became a variable interest entity ( vie ) under consolidation accounting guidelines with ball being identified as the primary beneficiary of the vie and consolidating the joint venture . latapack-ball operates metal beverage packaging manufacturing plants in tres rios , jacarei and salvador , brazil and has been included in the metal beverage packaging , americas and asia , reporting segment . in connection with the acquisition , the company recorded a gain of $ 81.8 million on its previously held equity investment in latapack-ball as a result of required purchase accounting . the following table summarizes the final fair values of the latapack-ball assets acquired , liabilities assumed and non- controlling interest recognized , as well as the related investment in latapack s.a. , as of the acquisition date . the valuation was based on market and income approaches. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash</td><td>$ 69.3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>current assets</td><td>84.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>property plant and equipment</td><td>265.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>goodwill</td><td>100.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>intangible asset</td><td>52.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>-53.2 ( 53.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>long-term liabilities</td><td>-174.1 ( 174.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 345.6</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>noncontrolling interests</td><td>$ -132.9 ( 132.9 )</td></tr></table> noncontrolling interests $ ( 132.9 ) the customer relationships were identified as an intangible asset by the company and assigned an estimated life of 13.4 years . the intangible asset is being amortized on a straight-line basis . neuman aluminum ( neuman ) in july 2010 , the company acquired neuman for approximately $ 62 million in cash . neuman had sales of approximately $ 128 million in 2009 ( unaudited ) and is the leading north american manufacturer of aluminum slugs used to make extruded aerosol cans , beverage bottles , aluminum collapsible tubes and technical impact extrusions . neuman operates two plants , one in the united states and one in canada , which employ approximately 180 people . the acquisition of neuman is not material to the metal food and household products packaging , americas , segment , in which its results of operations have been included since the acquisition date . guangdong jianlibao group co. , ltd ( jianlibao ) in june 2010 , the company acquired jianlibao 2019s 65 percent interest in a joint venture metal beverage can and end plant in sanshui ( foshan ) , prc . ball has owned 35 percent of the joint venture plant since 1992 . ball acquired the 65 percent interest for $ 86.9 million in cash ( net of cash acquired ) and assumed debt , and also entered into a long-term supply agreement with jianlibao and one of its affiliates . the company recorded equity earnings of $ 24.1 million , which was composed of equity earnings and a gain realized on the fair value of ball 2019s previous 35 percent equity investment as a result of required purchase accounting . the purchase accounting was completed during the third quarter of 2010 . the acquisition of the remaining interest is not material to the metal beverage packaging , americas and asia , segment. .\nQuestion: what percentage did the company acquire?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.101"
}
] |
CONVFINQA5912
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nchanges in the fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in citi 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loan interest depending on the balance sheet classifications of the credit products . the changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 27 million and a gain of $ 10 million , respectively . certain investments in unallocated precious metals citigroup invests in unallocated precious metals accounts ( gold , silver , platinum and palladium ) as part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities or to economically hedge certain exposures from issuing structured liabilities . under asc 815 , the investment is bifurcated into a debt host contract and a commodity forward derivative instrument . citigroup elects the fair value option for the debt host contract , and reports the debt host contract within trading account assets on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the total carrying amount of debt host contracts across unallocated precious metals accounts was approximately $ 0.4 billion and $ 0.9 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . the amounts are expected to fluctuate based on trading activity in future periods . as part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities , citi trades unallocated precious metals investments and executes forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts with trading counterparties . when citi sells an unallocated precious metals investment , citi 2019s receivable from its depository bank is repaid and citi derecognizes its investment in the unallocated precious metal . the forward purchase or sale contract with the trading counterparty indexed to unallocated precious metals is accounted for as a derivative , at fair value through earnings . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were approximately $ 13.7 billion and $ 10.3 billion in notional amounts of such forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts outstanding , respectively . certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method and other investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation . the company has elected the fair value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in citi 2019s investment companies , which are reported at fair value . the fair value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of these investments . all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value . these investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . citigroup also elected the fair value option for certain non-marketable equity securities whose risk is managed with derivative instruments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings . these securities are classified as trading account assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in the fair value of these securities and the related derivative instruments are recorded in principal transactions . effective january 1 , 2018 under asu 2016-01 and asu 2018-03 , a fair value option election is no longer required to measure these non-marketable equity securities through earnings . see note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for additional details . certain mortgage loans held-for-sale citigroup has elected the fair value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans hfs . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans hfs carried at fair value: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>december 312018</td><td>december 31 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet</td><td>$ 556</td><td>$ 426</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aggregate fair value in excess of ( less than ) unpaid principal balance</td><td>21</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> the changes in the fair values of these mortgage loans are reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . there was no net change in fair value during the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 due to instrument-specific credit risk . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue in the consolidated statement of income. .\nQuestion: what was the 2018 carrying amount?\nAnswer: 556.0\nQuestion: what was it in 2017?\nAnswer: 426.0\nQuestion: what is the net change in value?\nAnswer: 130.0\nQuestion: what is the net change over the 2017 value?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.30516"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1860
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\navailable information . the company 2019s annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8- k , proxy statements and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the company 2019s internet website at http://www.everestregroup.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) . item 1a . risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector during the fourth quarter of 2014 . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . subsequent to april 1 , 2010 , we define a catastrophe as an event that causes a loss on property exposures before reinsurance of at least $ 10.0 million , before corporate level reinsurance and taxes . prior to april 1 , 2010 , we used a threshold of $ 5.0 million . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calendar year:</td><td>pre-tax catastrophe losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 62.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>195.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>410.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1300.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2010</td><td>571.1</td></tr></table> our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .\nQuestion: what is the sum of accumulated pre-tax catastrophe loss in 2010 and 2011?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1871.5"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4368
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n57management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations facility include covenants relating to net interest coverage and total debt-to-book capitalization ratios . the company was in compliance with the terms of the 3-year credit facility at december 31 , 2005 . the company has never borrowed under its domestic revolving credit facilities . utilization of the non-u.s . credit facilities may also be dependent on the company's ability to meet certain conditions at the time a borrowing is requested . contractual obligations , guarantees , and other purchase commitments contractual obligations summarized in the table below are the company's obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt obligations ( assuming earliest possible exercise of put rights by holders ) , lease payment obligations , and purchase obligations as of december 31 , 2005 . payments due by period ( 1 ) ( in millions ) total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 thereafter . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) total</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2006</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2007</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2008</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2009</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) 2010</td><td>payments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term debt obligations</td><td>$ 4033</td><td>$ 119</td><td>$ 1222</td><td>$ 200</td><td>$ 2</td><td>$ 529</td><td>$ 1961</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>lease obligations</td><td>1150</td><td>438</td><td>190</td><td>134</td><td>109</td><td>84</td><td>195</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchase obligations</td><td>992</td><td>418</td><td>28</td><td>3</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>539</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total contractual obligations</td><td>$ 6175</td><td>$ 975</td><td>$ 1440</td><td>$ 337</td><td>$ 113</td><td>$ 615</td><td>$ 2695</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amounts included represent firm , non-cancelable commitments . debt obligations : at december 31 , 2005 , the company's long-term debt obligations , including current maturities and unamortized discount and issue costs , totaled $ 4.0 billion , as compared to $ 5.0 billion at december 31 , 2004 . a table of all outstanding long-term debt securities can be found in note 4 , \"\"debt and credit facilities'' to the company's consolidated financial statements . as previously discussed , the decrease in the long- term debt obligations as compared to december 31 , 2004 , was due to the redemptions and repurchases of $ 1.0 billion principal amount of outstanding securities during 2005 . also , as previously discussed , the remaining $ 118 million of 7.6% ( 7.6 % ) notes due january 1 , 2007 were reclassified to current maturities of long-term debt . lease obligations : the company owns most of its major facilities , but does lease certain office , factory and warehouse space , land , and information technology and other equipment under principally non-cancelable operating leases . at december 31 , 2005 , future minimum lease obligations , net of minimum sublease rentals , totaled $ 1.2 billion . rental expense , net of sublease income , was $ 254 million in 2005 , $ 217 million in 2004 and $ 223 million in 2003 . purchase obligations : the company has entered into agreements for the purchase of inventory , license of software , promotional agreements , and research and development agreements which are firm commitments and are not cancelable . the longest of these agreements extends through 2015 . total payments expected to be made under these agreements total $ 992 million . commitments under other long-term agreements : the company has entered into certain long-term agreements to purchase software , components , supplies and materials from suppliers . most of the agreements extend for periods of one to three years ( three to five years for software ) . however , generally these agreements do not obligate the company to make any purchases , and many permit the company to terminate the agreement with advance notice ( usually ranging from 60 to 180 days ) . if the company were to terminate these agreements , it generally would be liable for certain termination charges , typically based on work performed and supplier on-hand inventory and raw materials attributable to canceled orders . the company's liability would only arise in the event it terminates the agreements for reasons other than \"\"cause.'' in 2003 , the company entered into outsourcing contracts for certain corporate functions , such as benefit administration and information technology related services . these contracts generally extend for 10 years and are expected to expire in 2013 . the total payments under these contracts are approximately $ 3 billion over 10 years ; however , these contracts can be terminated . termination would result in a penalty substantially less than the annual contract payments . the company would also be required to find another source for these services , including the possibility of performing them in-house . as is customary in bidding for and completing network infrastructure projects and pursuant to a practice the company has followed for many years , the company has a number of performance/bid bonds and standby letters of credit outstanding , primarily relating to projects of government and enterprise mobility solutions segment and the networks segment . these instruments normally have maturities of up to three years and are standard in the .\nQuestion: what was the difference in total contractual obligations between 2006 and 2010?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "360.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6003
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 2003 were $ 10.08 , $ 7.05 , and $ 6.32 per share , respectively . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows : july 1 , 2005 2013 december 31 , 2005 january 1 , 2005 2013 june 30 , 2005 2004 2003 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>july 1 2005 2013 december 31 2005</td><td>january 1 2005 2013 june 30 2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>approximate risk-free interest rate</td><td>3.22% ( 3.22 % ) - 4.40% ( 4.40 % )</td><td>4.17% ( 4.17 % ) - 4.40% ( 4.40 % )</td><td>4.23% ( 4.23 % )</td><td>4.00% ( 4.00 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected life of option grants</td><td>6.25 years</td><td>4 years</td><td>4 years</td><td>4 years</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility of underlying stock</td><td>29.6% ( 29.6 % )</td><td>75.3% ( 75.3 % ) - 79.2% ( 79.2 % )</td><td>80.6% ( 80.6 % )</td><td>86.6% ( 86.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected volatility of underlying stock ( atc mexico and atc south america plans )</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>expected dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> voluntary option exchanges 2014in february 2004 , the company issued to eligible employees 1032717 options with an exercise price of $ 11.19 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant . these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in august 2003 , pursuant to which the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options to purchase a total of 1831981 shares of its class a common stock having an exercise price of $ 10.25 or greater . the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding the company 2019s executive officers and its directors , provided for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option . no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant atc mexico stock option plan 2014the company maintains a stock option plan in its atc mexico subsidiary ( atc mexico plan ) . the atc mexico plan provides for the issuance of options to officers , employees , directors and consultants of atc mexico . the atc mexico plan limits the number of shares of common stock which may be granted to an aggregate of 360 shares , subject to adjustment based on changes in atc mexico 2019s capital structure . during 2002 , atc mexico granted options to purchase 318 shares of atc mexico common stock to officers and employees . such options were issued at one time with an exercise price of $ 10000 per share . the exercise price per share was at fair market value as determined by the board of directors with the assistance of an independent appraisal performed at the company 2019s request . the fair value of atc mexico plan options granted during 2002 were $ 3611 per share as determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model . as described in note 11 , all outstanding options were exercised in march 2004 . no options under the atc mexico plan were outstanding as of december 31 , 2005 . ( see note 11. ) atc south america stock option plan 2014the company maintains a stock option plan in its atc south america subsidiary ( atc south america plan ) . the atc south america plan provides for the issuance of options to officers , employees , directors and consultants of atc south america . the atc south america plan limits the number of shares of common stock which may be granted to an aggregate of 6144 shares , ( an approximate 10.3% ( 10.3 % ) interest on a fully-diluted basis ) , subject to adjustment based on changes in atc south america 2019s capital structure . during 2004 , atc south america granted options to purchase 6024 shares of atc south america common stock to officers and employees , including messrs . gearon and hess , who received options to purchase an approximate 6.7% ( 6.7 % ) and 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) interest , respectively . such options were issued at one time with an exercise price of $ 1349 per share . the exercise price per share was at fair market value on the date of issuance as determined by the board of directors with the assistance of an independent appraisal performed at the company 2019s request . the fair value of atc south america plan options granted during 2004 were $ 79 per share as determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model . options granted vest upon the earlier to occur of ( a ) the exercise by or on behalf of mr . gearon of his right to sell his interest in atc south america to the company , ( b ) the .\nQuestion: what is the total value of proceeds from the issuance of employee options during february 2004?\nAnswer: 11556103.23\nQuestion: what is this value in millions?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "11.5561"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1522
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nlatin american investments during 2009 , the company acquired a land parcel located in rio clara , brazil through a newly formed consolidated joint venture in which the company has a 70% ( 70 % ) controlling ownership interest for a purchase price of 3.3 million brazilian reals ( approximately usd $ 1.5 million ) . this parcel will be developed into a 48000 square foot retail shopping center . additionally , during 2009 , the company acquired a land parcel located in san luis potosi , mexico , through an unconsolidated joint venture in which the company has a noncontrolling interest , for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $ 0.8 million . the company recognized equity in income from its unconsolidated mexican investments in real estate joint ventures of approximately $ 7.0 million , $ 17.1 million , and $ 5.2 million during 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the company recognized equity in income from its unconsolidated chilean investments in real estate joint ventures of approximately $ 0.4 million , $ 0.2 and $ 0.1 million during 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the company 2019s revenues from its consolidated mexican subsidiaries aggregated approximately $ 23.4 million , $ 20.3 million , $ 8.5 million during 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the company 2019s revenues from its consolidated brazilian subsidiaries aggregated approximately $ 1.5 million and $ 0.4 million during 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the company 2019s revenues from its consolidated chilean subsidiaries aggregated less than $ 100000 during 2009 and 2008 , respectively . mortgages and other financing receivables during 2009 , the company provided financing to five borrowers for an aggregate amount of approximately $ 8.3 million . during 2009 , the company received an aggregate of approximately $ 40.4 million which fully paid down the outstanding balance on four mortgage receivables . as of december 31 , 2009 , the company had 37 loans with total commitments of up to $ 178.9 million , of which approximately $ 131.3 million has been funded . availability under the company 2019s revolving credit facilities are expected to be sufficient to fund these remaining commitments . ( see note 10 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on form 10-k. ) asset impairments on a continuous basis , management assesses whether there are any indicators , including property operating performance and general market conditions , that the value of the company 2019s assets ( including any related amortizable intangible assets or liabilities ) may be impaired . to the extent impairment has occurred , the carrying value of the asset would be adjusted to an amount to reflect the estimated fair value of the asset . during 2009 , economic conditions had continued to experience volatility resulting in further declines in the real estate and equity markets . year over year increases in capitalization rates , discount rates and vacancies as well as the deterioration of real estate market fundamentals , negatively impacted net operating income and leasing which further contributed to declines in real estate markets in general . as a result of the volatility and declining market conditions described above , as well as the company 2019s strategy in relation to certain of its non-retail assets , the company recognized non-cash impairment charges during 2009 , aggregating approximately $ 175.1 million , before income tax benefit of approximately $ 22.5 million and noncontrolling interests of approximately $ 1.2 million . details of these non-cash impairment charges are as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>impairment of property carrying values</td><td>$ 50.0</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>real estate under development</td><td>2.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investments in other real estate investments</td><td>49.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>marketable securities and other investments</td><td>30.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>investments in real estate joint ventures</td><td>43.7</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total impairment charges</td><td>$ 175.1</td></tr></table> ( see notes 2 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 and 11 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on form 10-k. ) .\nQuestion: what was the income tax benefit in 2009?\nAnswer: 22.5\nQuestion: and the value of noncontrolling interests?\nAnswer: 1.2\nQuestion: combined, what is the total value of these two?\nAnswer: 23.7\nQuestion: and including total impairment charges?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "198.8"
}
] |
CONVFINQA10861
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nduring 2009 , the company extended the contractual life of 4 million fully vested share options held by 6 employees . as a result of that modification , the company recognized additional compensation expense of $ 1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2009 . restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) performance-based rsus . the company grants performance-based rsus to the company 2019s executive officers and certain employees once per year . the company may also grant performance-based rsus to certain new employees or to employees who assume positions of increasing responsibility at the time those events occur . the number of performance-based rsus that ultimately vest is dependent on one or both of the following as per the terms of the specific award agreement : the achievement of 1 ) internal profitability targets ( performance condition ) and 2 ) market performance targets measured by the comparison of the company 2019s stock performance versus a defined peer group ( market condition ) . the performance-based rsus generally cliff-vest during the company 2019s quarter-end september 30 black-out period three years from the date of grant . the ultimate number of shares of the company 2019s series a common stock issued will range from zero to stretch , with stretch defined individually under each award , net of personal income taxes withheld . the market condition is factored into the estimated fair value per unit and compensation expense for each award will be based on the probability of achieving internal profitability targets , as applicable , and recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective grant , less estimated forfeitures . for performance-based rsus granted without a performance condition , compensation expense is based on the fair value per unit recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the grant , less estimated forfeitures . in april 2007 , the company granted performance-based rsus to certain employees that vest annually in equal tranches beginning october 1 , 2008 through october 1 , 2011 and include a market condition . the performance- based rsus awarded include a catch-up provision that provides for an additional year of vesting of previously unvested amounts , subject to certain maximums . compensation expense is based on the fair value per unit recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the grant , less estimated forfeitures . a summary of changes in performance-based rsus outstanding is as follows : number of weighted average fair value ( in thousands ) ( in $ ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of units ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted average fair value ( in $ )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2008</td><td>1188</td><td>19.65</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>420</td><td>38.16</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-79 ( 79 )</td><td>21.30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-114 ( 114 )</td><td>17.28</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2009</td><td>1415</td><td>25.24</td></tr></table> the fair value of shares vested for performance-based rsus during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 2 million and $ 3 million , respectively . there were no vestings that occurred during the year ended december 31 , 2007 . fair value for the company 2019s performance-based rsus was estimated at the grant date using a monte carlo simulation approach . monte carlo simulation was utilized to randomly generate future stock returns for the company and each company in the defined peer group for each grant based on company-specific dividend yields , volatilities and stock return correlations . these returns were used to calculate future performance-based rsu vesting percentages and the simulated values of the vested performance-based rsus were then discounted to present value using a risk-free rate , yielding the expected value of these performance-based rsus . %%transmsg*** transmitting job : d70731 pcn : 119000000 ***%%pcmsg|119 |00016|yes|no|02/10/2010 16:17|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .\nQuestion: throughout the year of 2009, what was the increase in the balance of non vested units, in thousands?\nAnswer: 227.0\nQuestion: and what was that balance by the end of the year?\nAnswer: 1415000.0\nQuestion: what was the weighted average fair value of these units?\nAnswer: 25.24\nQuestion: what was, then, their total value?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "35714600.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6252
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n. <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>contractual obligations</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>long-term obligations excluding capital leases</td><td>888810</td><td>753045</td><td>700608</td><td>1787451</td><td>3159286</td><td>7188751</td><td>14477951</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash interest expense</td><td>550000</td><td>517000</td><td>485000</td><td>399000</td><td>315000</td><td>654000</td><td>2920000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital lease payments ( including interest )</td><td>15589</td><td>14049</td><td>12905</td><td>12456</td><td>10760</td><td>173313</td><td>239072</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total debt service obligations</td><td>1454399</td><td>1284094</td><td>1198513</td><td>2198907</td><td>3485046</td><td>8016064</td><td>17637023</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>operating lease payments ( 11 )</td><td>574438</td><td>553864</td><td>538405</td><td>519034</td><td>502847</td><td>4214600</td><td>6903188</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other non-current liabilities ( 12 ) ( 13 )</td><td>11082</td><td>20480</td><td>5705</td><td>13911</td><td>4186</td><td>1860071</td><td>1915435</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 2039919</td><td>$ 1858438</td><td>$ 1742623</td><td>$ 2731852</td><td>$ 3992079</td><td>$ 14090735</td><td>$ 26455646</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) represents anticipated repayment date ; final legal maturity date is march 15 , 2043 . ( 2 ) represents anticipated repayment date ; final legal maturity date is march 15 , 2048 . ( 3 ) in connection with our acquisition of mipt on october 1 , 2013 , we assumed approximately $ 1.49 billion aggregate principal amount of secured notes , $ 250.0 million of which we repaid in august 2014 . the gtp notes have anticipated repayment dates beginning june 15 , 2016 . ( 4 ) assumed in connection with our acquisition of br towers and denominated in brl . the br towers debenture amortizes through october 2023 . the br towers credit facility amortizes through january 15 , ( 5 ) assumed by us in connection with the unison acquisition , and have anticipated repayment dates of april 15 , 2017 , april 15 , 2020 and april 15 , 2020 , respectively , and a final maturity date of april 15 , 2040 . ( 6 ) denominated in mxn . ( 7 ) denominated in zar and amortizes through march 31 , 2020 . ( 8 ) denominated in cop and amortizes through april 24 , 2021 . ( 9 ) reflects balances owed to our joint venture partners in ghana and uganda . the ghana loan is denominated in ghs and the uganda loan is denominated in usd . ( 10 ) on february 11 , 2015 , we redeemed all of the outstanding 4.625% ( 4.625 % ) notes in accordance with the terms thereof . ( 11 ) includes payments under non-cancellable initial terms , as well as payments for certain renewal periods at our option , which we expect to renew because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable communications sites and related revenues from tenant leases . ( 12 ) primarily represents our asset retirement obligations and excludes certain other non-current liabilities included in our consolidated balance sheet , primarily our straight-line rent liability for which cash payments are included in operating lease payments and unearned revenue that is not payable in cash . ( 13 ) excludes $ 26.6 million of liabilities for unrecognized tax positions and $ 24.9 million of accrued income tax related interest and penalties included in our consolidated balance sheet as we are uncertain as to when and if the amounts may be settled . settlement of such amounts could require the use of cash flows generated from operations . we expect the unrecognized tax benefits to change over the next 12 months if certain tax matters ultimately settle with the applicable taxing jurisdiction during this timeframe . however , based on the status of these items and the amount of uncertainty associated with the outcome and timing of audit settlements , we are currently unable to estimate the impact of the amount of such changes , if any , to previously recorded uncertain tax positions . off-balance sheet arrangements . we have no material off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in item 303 ( a ) ( 4 ) ( ii ) of sec regulation s-k . interest rate swap agreements . we have entered into interest rate swap agreements to manage our exposure to variability in interest rates on debt in colombia and south africa . all of our interest rate swap agreements have been designated as cash flow hedges and have an aggregate notional amount of $ 79.9 million , interest rates ranging from 5.74% ( 5.74 % ) to 7.83% ( 7.83 % ) and expiration dates through april 2021 . in february 2014 , we repaid the costa rica loan and subsequently terminated the associated interest rate swap agreements . additionally , in connection with entering into the colombian credit facility in october 2014 , we terminated our pre-existing interest rate .\nQuestion: what was the sum of the minimum and the maximum interest rates?\nAnswer: 13.57\nQuestion: and what is the average between those two interest rates?\nAnswer: 6.785\nQuestion: how much is this average interest rate numerically, or as a portion of the number one?\nAnswer: 0.06785\nQuestion: what, then, is the amount from the aggregate notional amount that is represented by that average interest rate, in millions?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "5.42122"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6217
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nimpairment of long-lived assets , goodwill and intangible assets - we assess our long-lived assets for impairment based on statement 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets . 201d a long-lived asset is tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may exceed its fair value . fair values are based on the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the assets . we assess our goodwill and intangible assets for impairment at least annually based on statement 142 , 201cgoodwill and other intangible assets . 201d there were no impairment charges resulting from the july 1 , 2007 , impairment tests and no events indicating an impairment have occurred subsequent to that date . an initial assessment is made by comparing the fair value of the operations with goodwill , as determined in accordance with statement 142 , to the book value of each reporting unit . if the fair value is less than the book value , an impairment is indicated , and we must perform a second test to measure the amount of the impairment . in the second test , we calculate the implied fair value of the goodwill by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets of the operations with goodwill from the fair value determined in step one of the assessment . if the carrying value of the goodwill exceeds this calculated implied fair value of the goodwill , we will record an impairment charge . at december 31 , 2007 , we had $ 600.7 million of goodwill recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as shown below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( thousands of dollars )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>oneok partners</td><td>$ 431418</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>distribution</td><td>157953</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>energy services</td><td>10255</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>1099</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total goodwill</td><td>$ 600725</td></tr></table> ( thousands of dollars ) intangible assets with a finite useful life are amortized over their estimated useful life , while intangible assets with an indefinite useful life are not amortized . all intangible assets are subject to impairment testing . our oneok partners segment had $ 443.0 million of intangible assets recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2007 , of which $ 287.5 million is being amortized over an aggregate weighted-average period of 40 years , while the remaining balance has an indefinite life . during 2006 , we recorded a goodwill and asset impairment related to oneok partners 2019 black mesa pipeline of $ 8.4 million and $ 3.6 million , respectively , which were recorded as depreciation and amortization . the reduction to our net income , net of minority interests and income taxes , was $ 3.0 million . in the third quarter of 2005 , we made the decision to sell our spring creek power plant , located in oklahoma , and exit the power generation business . in october 2005 , we concluded that our spring creek power plant had been impaired and recorded an impairment expense of $ 52.2 million . this conclusion was based on our statement 144 impairment analysis of the results of operations for this plant through september 30 , 2005 , and also the net sales proceeds from the anticipated sale of the plant . the sale was completed on october 31 , 2006 . this component of our business is accounted for as discontinued operations in accordance with statement 144 . see 201cdiscontinued operations 201d on page 46 for additional information . our total unamortized excess cost over underlying fair value of net assets accounted for under the equity method was $ 185.6 million as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 . based on statement 142 , this amount , referred to as equity method goodwill , should continue to be recognized in accordance with apb opinion no . 18 , 201cthe equity method of accounting for investments in common stock . 201d accordingly , we included this amount in investment in unconsolidated affiliates on our accompanying consolidated balance sheets . pension and postretirement employee benefits - we have defined benefit retirement plans covering certain full-time employees . we sponsor welfare plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits to certain employees who retire with at least five years of service . our actuarial consultant calculates the expense and liability related to these plans and uses statistical and other factors that attempt to anticipate future events . these factors include assumptions about the discount rate , expected return on plan assets , rate of future compensation increases , age and employment periods . in determining the projected benefit obligations and costs , assumptions can change from period to period and result in material changes in the costs and liabilities we recognize . see note j of the notes to consolidated financial statements in this annual report on form 10-k for additional information. .\nQuestion: what is the goodwill value from oneok partners?\nAnswer: 431418.0\nQuestion: what about the total goodwill?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "600725.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA1010
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) net cash used in investing activities during 2012 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions , partially offset by the net proceeds of $ 94.8 received from the sale of our remaining holdings in facebook . capital expenditures of $ 169.2 primarily related to computer hardware and software , and leasehold improvements . capital expenditures increased in 2012 compared to the prior year , primarily due to an increase in leasehold improvements made during the year . payments for acquisitions of $ 145.5 primarily related to payments for new acquisitions . financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2013 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock , and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 600.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) notes . in addition , we repurchased 31.8 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 481.8 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 126.0 on our common stock . net cash provided by financing activities during 2012 primarily reflected net proceeds from our debt transactions . we issued $ 300.0 in aggregate principal amount of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) senior notes due 2017 ( the 201c2.25% ( 201c2.25 % ) notes 201d ) , $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of 3.75% ( 3.75 % ) senior notes due 2023 ( the 201c3.75% ( 201c3.75 % ) notes 201d ) and $ 250.0 in aggregate principal amount of 4.00% ( 4.00 % ) senior notes due 2022 ( the 201c4.00% ( 201c4.00 % ) notes 201d ) . the proceeds from the issuance of the 4.00% ( 4.00 % ) notes were applied towards the repurchase and redemption of $ 399.6 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes . offsetting the net proceeds from our debt transactions was the repurchase of 32.7 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 350.5 , including fees , and dividend payments of $ 103.4 on our common stock . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 94.1 in 2013 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , japanese yen , canadian dollar and south african rand as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 6.2 in 2012 . the decrease was a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the brazilian real and south african rand , offset by the u.s . dollar being weaker than other foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , british pound and the euro , as of as of december 31 , 2012 compared to december 31 , 2011. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance sheet data</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 1642.1</td><td>$ 2590.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 179.1</td><td>$ 172.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>353.6</td><td>216.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>1129.8</td><td>2060.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 1662.5</td><td>$ 2449.5</td></tr></table> liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends. .\nQuestion: what was the value of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities in 2013?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "1642.1"
}
] |
CONVFINQA3383
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 29 part ii item 5 2013 market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities ( a ) ( 1 ) our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange and is traded under the symbol 201cpnc . 201d at the close of business on february 15 , 2019 , there were 53986 common shareholders of record . holders of pnc common stock are entitled to receive dividends when declared by our board of directors out of funds legally available for this purpose . our board of directors may not pay or set apart dividends on the common stock until dividends for all past dividend periods on any series of outstanding preferred stock and certain outstanding capital securities issued by the parent company have been paid or declared and set apart for payment . the board of directors presently intends to continue the policy of paying quarterly cash dividends . the amount of any future dividends will depend on economic and market conditions , our financial condition and operating results , and other factors , including contractual restrictions and applicable government regulations and policies ( such as those relating to the ability of bank and non-bank subsidiaries to pay dividends to the parent company and regulatory capital limitations ) . the amount of our dividend is also currently subject to the results of the supervisory assessment of capital adequacy and capital planning processes undertaken by the federal reserve and our primary bank regulators as part of the comprehensive capital analysis and review ( ccar ) process as described in the supervision and regulation section in item 1 of this report . the federal reserve has the power to prohibit us from paying dividends without its approval . for further information concerning dividend restrictions and other factors that could limit our ability to pay dividends , as well as restrictions on loans , dividends or advances from bank subsidiaries to the parent company , see the supervision and regulation section in item 1 , item 1a risk factors , the liquidity and capital management portion of the risk management section in item 7 , and note 10 borrowed funds , note 15 equity and note 18 regulatory matters in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report , which we include here by reference . we include here by reference the information regarding our compensation plans under which pnc equity securities are authorized for issuance as of december 31 , 2018 in the table ( with introductory paragraph and notes ) in item 12 of this report . our stock transfer agent and registrar is : computershare trust company , n.a . 250 royall street canton , ma 02021 800-982-7652 www.computershare.com/pnc registered shareholders may contact computershare regarding dividends and other shareholder services . we include here by reference the information that appears under the common stock performance graph caption at the end of this item 5 . ( a ) ( 2 ) none . ( b ) not applicable . ( c ) details of our repurchases of pnc common stock during the fourth quarter of 2018 are included in the following table : in thousands , except per share data 2018 period total shares purchased ( a ) average price paid per share total shares purchased as part of publicly announced programs ( b ) maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the programs ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018 period</td><td>total shares purchased ( a )</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>total shares purchased as part of publicly announced programs ( b )</td><td>maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the programs ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 2013 31</td><td>1204</td><td>$ 128.43</td><td>1189</td><td>25663</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 2013 30</td><td>1491</td><td>$ 133.79</td><td>1491</td><td>24172</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 2013 31</td><td>3458</td><td>$ 119.43</td><td>3458</td><td>20714</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>6153</td><td>$ 124.67</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes pnc common stock purchased in connection with our various employee benefit plans generally related to forfeitures of unvested restricted stock awards and shares used to cover employee payroll tax withholding requirements . note 11 employee benefit plans and note 12 stock based compensation plans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report include additional information regarding our employee benefit and equity compensation plans that use pnc common stock . ( b ) on march 11 , 2015 , we announced that our board of directors approved a stock repurchase program authorization in the amount of 100 million shares of pnc common stock , effective april 1 , 2015 . repurchases are made in open market or privately negotiated transactions and the timing and exact amount of common stock repurchases will depend on a number of factors including , among others , market and general economic conditions , regulatory capital considerations , alternative uses of capital , the potential impact on our credit ratings , and contractual and regulatory limitations , including the results of the supervisory assessment of capital adequacy and capital planning processes undertaken by the federal reserve as part of the ccar process . in june 2018 , we announced share repurchase programs of up to $ 2.0 billion for the four quarter period beginning with the third quarter of 2018 , including repurchases of up to $ 300 million related to stock issuances under employee benefit plans , in accordance with pnc's 2018 capital plan . in november 2018 , we announced an increase to these previously announced programs in the amount of up to $ 900 million in additional common share repurchases . the aggregate repurchase price of shares repurchased during the fourth quarter of 2018 was $ .8 billion . see the liquidity and capital management portion of the risk management section in item 7 of this report for more information on the authorized share repurchase programs for the period july 1 , 2018 through june 30 , 2019 . http://www.computershare.com/pnc .\nQuestion: what is the number of shares purchased during october 2018?\nAnswer: 1204.0\nQuestion: at what average price?\nAnswer: 128.43\nQuestion: what is the total value of these shares?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "154629.72"
}
] |
CONVFINQA9048
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nz i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 2 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such requirement . fair value commitments under the credit facility are subject to certain the carrying value of the company 2019s borrowings approxi- fees , including a facility and a utilization fee . mates fair value due to their short-term maturities and uncommitted credit facilities variable interest rates . the company has a $ 26 million uncommitted unsecured 8 . derivative financial instruments revolving line of credit . the purpose of this credit line is to support the working capital needs , letters of credit and the company is exposed to market risk due to changes overdraft needs for the company . the uncommitted credit in currency exchange rates . as a result , the company utilizes agreement contains customary affirmative and negative cove- foreign exchange forward contracts to offset the effect of nants and events of default , none of which are considered exchange rate fluctuations on anticipated foreign currency restrictive to the operation of the business . in addition , this transactions , primarily intercompany sales and purchases uncommitted credit agreement provides for unconditional expected to occur within the next twelve to twenty-four and irrevocable guarantees by the company . in the event the months . the company does not hold financial instruments company 2019s long-term debt ratings by both standard and for trading or speculative purposes . for derivatives which poor 2019s ratings services and moody 2019s investor 2019s service , inc. , qualify as hedges of future cash flows , the effective portion fall below bb- and ba3 , then the company may be required of changes in fair value is temporarily recorded in other to repay all outstanding and contingent obligations . the comprehensive income , then recognized in earnings when company 2019s credit rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such the hedged item affects earnings . the ineffective portion of requirement . this uncommitted credit line matures on a derivative 2019s change in fair value , if any , is reported in july 31 , 2003 . outstanding borrowings under this uncommit- earnings . the net amount recognized in earnings during the ted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 were $ 0.5 million years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , due to ineffective- with a weighted average interest rate of 6.35 percent . ness and amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge the company also has a $ 15 million uncommitted effectiveness , was not significant . revolving unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of the notional amounts of outstanding foreign exchange credit is to support short-term working capital needs of the forward contracts , principally japanese yen and the euro , company . the agreement for this uncommitted unsecured entered into with third parties , at december 31 , 2002 , was line of credit contains customary covenants , none of which $ 252 million . the fair value of derivative instruments recorded are considered restrictive to the operation of the business . in accrued liabilities at december 31 , 2002 , was $ 13.8 million , this uncommitted line matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were or $ 8.5 million net of taxes , which is deferred in other no borrowings under this uncommitted line of credit as of comprehensive income and is expected to be reclassified to december 31 , 2002 . earnings over the next two years , of which , $ 7.7 million , or the company has a $ 20 million uncommitted revolving $ 4.8 million , net of taxes , is expected to be reclassified to unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of credit is earnings over the next twelve months . to support short-term working capital needs of the company . the pricing is based upon money market rates . the agree- 9 . capital stock and earnings per share ment for this uncommitted unsecured line of credit contains as discussed in note 14 , all of the shares of company customary covenants , none of which are considered restrictive common stock were distributed at the distribution by the to the operation of the business . this uncommitted line former parent to its stockholders in the form of a dividend matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were no borrowings under of one share of company common stock , and the associated this uncommitted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 . preferred stock purchase right , for every ten shares of the company was in compliance with all covenants common stock of the former parent . in july 2001 the board under all three of the uncommitted credit facilities as of of directors of the company adopted a rights agreement december 31 , 2002 . the company had no long-term debt intended to have anti-takeover effects . under this agreement as of december 31 , 2002 . one right attaches to each share of company common stock . outstanding debt as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , the rights will not become exercisable until the earlier of : consist of the following ( in millions ) : a ) the company learns that a person or group acquired , or 2002 2001 obtained the right to acquire , beneficial ownership of securi- credit facility $ 156.2 $ 358.2 ties representing more than 20 percent of the shares of uncommitted credit facilities 0.5 5.7 company common stock then outstanding , or b ) such date , if any , as may be designated by the board of directorstotal debt $ 156.7 $ 363.9 following the commencement of , or first public disclosure of the company paid $ 13.0 million and $ 4.6 million in an intention to commence , a tender offer or exchange offer interest charges during 2002 and 2001 , respectively. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>credit facility</td><td>$ 156.2</td><td>$ 358.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>uncommitted credit facilities</td><td>0.5</td><td>5.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 156.7</td><td>$ 363.9</td></tr></table> z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 2 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such requirement . fair value commitments under the credit facility are subject to certain the carrying value of the company 2019s borrowings approxi- fees , including a facility and a utilization fee . mates fair value due to their short-term maturities and uncommitted credit facilities variable interest rates . the company has a $ 26 million uncommitted unsecured 8 . derivative financial instruments revolving line of credit . the purpose of this credit line is to support the working capital needs , letters of credit and the company is exposed to market risk due to changes overdraft needs for the company . the uncommitted credit in currency exchange rates . as a result , the company utilizes agreement contains customary affirmative and negative cove- foreign exchange forward contracts to offset the effect of nants and events of default , none of which are considered exchange rate fluctuations on anticipated foreign currency restrictive to the operation of the business . in addition , this transactions , primarily intercompany sales and purchases uncommitted credit agreement provides for unconditional expected to occur within the next twelve to twenty-four and irrevocable guarantees by the company . in the event the months . the company does not hold financial instruments company 2019s long-term debt ratings by both standard and for trading or speculative purposes . for derivatives which poor 2019s ratings services and moody 2019s investor 2019s service , inc. , qualify as hedges of future cash flows , the effective portion fall below bb- and ba3 , then the company may be required of changes in fair value is temporarily recorded in other to repay all outstanding and contingent obligations . the comprehensive income , then recognized in earnings when company 2019s credit rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such the hedged item affects earnings . the ineffective portion of requirement . this uncommitted credit line matures on a derivative 2019s change in fair value , if any , is reported in july 31 , 2003 . outstanding borrowings under this uncommit- earnings . the net amount recognized in earnings during the ted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 were $ 0.5 million years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , due to ineffective- with a weighted average interest rate of 6.35 percent . ness and amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge the company also has a $ 15 million uncommitted effectiveness , was not significant . revolving unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of the notional amounts of outstanding foreign exchange credit is to support short-term working capital needs of the forward contracts , principally japanese yen and the euro , company . the agreement for this uncommitted unsecured entered into with third parties , at december 31 , 2002 , was line of credit contains customary covenants , none of which $ 252 million . the fair value of derivative instruments recorded are considered restrictive to the operation of the business . in accrued liabilities at december 31 , 2002 , was $ 13.8 million , this uncommitted line matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were or $ 8.5 million net of taxes , which is deferred in other no borrowings under this uncommitted line of credit as of comprehensive income and is expected to be reclassified to december 31 , 2002 . earnings over the next two years , of which , $ 7.7 million , or the company has a $ 20 million uncommitted revolving $ 4.8 million , net of taxes , is expected to be reclassified to unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of credit is earnings over the next twelve months . to support short-term working capital needs of the company . the pricing is based upon money market rates . the agree- 9 . capital stock and earnings per share ment for this uncommitted unsecured line of credit contains as discussed in note 14 , all of the shares of company customary covenants , none of which are considered restrictive common stock were distributed at the distribution by the to the operation of the business . this uncommitted line former parent to its stockholders in the form of a dividend matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were no borrowings under of one share of company common stock , and the associated this uncommitted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 . preferred stock purchase right , for every ten shares of the company was in compliance with all covenants common stock of the former parent . in july 2001 the board under all three of the uncommitted credit facilities as of of directors of the company adopted a rights agreement december 31 , 2002 . the company had no long-term debt intended to have anti-takeover effects . under this agreement as of december 31 , 2002 . one right attaches to each share of company common stock . outstanding debt as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , the rights will not become exercisable until the earlier of : consist of the following ( in millions ) : a ) the company learns that a person or group acquired , or 2002 2001 obtained the right to acquire , beneficial ownership of securi- credit facility $ 156.2 $ 358.2 ties representing more than 20 percent of the shares of uncommitted credit facilities 0.5 5.7 company common stock then outstanding , or b ) such date , if any , as may be designated by the board of directorstotal debt $ 156.7 $ 363.9 following the commencement of , or first public disclosure of the company paid $ 13.0 million and $ 4.6 million in an intention to commence , a tender offer or exchange offer interest charges during 2002 and 2001 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the total debt for 2002?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "156.7"
}
] |
CONVFINQA9102
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues in equities were $ 6.60 billion , 4% ( 4 % ) lower than 2016 , primarily due to lower commissions and fees , reflecting a decline in our listed cash equity volumes in the u.s . market volumes in the u.s . also declined . in addition , net revenues in equities client execution were lower , reflecting lower net revenues in derivatives , partially offset by higher net revenues in cash products . net revenues in securities services were essentially unchanged . operating expenses were $ 9.69 billion for 2017 , essentially unchanged compared with 2016 , due to decreased compensation and benefits expenses , reflecting lower net revenues , largely offset by increased technology expenses , reflecting higher expenses related to cloud-based services and software depreciation , and increased consulting costs . pre-tax earnings were $ 2.21 billion in 2017 , 54% ( 54 % ) lower than 2016 . investing & lending investing & lending includes our investing activities and the origination of loans , including our relationship lending activities , to provide financing to clients . these investments and loans are typically longer-term in nature . we make investments , some of which are consolidated , including through our merchant banking business and our special situations group , in debt securities and loans , public and private equity securities , infrastructure and real estate entities . some of these investments are made indirectly through funds that we manage . we also make unsecured loans through our digital platform , marcus : by goldman sachs and secured loans through our digital platform , goldman sachs private bank select . the table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>year ended december 2018</td><td>year ended december 2017</td><td>year ended december 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity securities</td><td>$ 4455</td><td>$ 4578</td><td>$ 2573</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt securities and loans</td><td>3795</td><td>2660</td><td>1689</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total net revenues</td><td>8250</td><td>7238</td><td>4262</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>provision for credit losses</td><td>674</td><td>657</td><td>182</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>operating expenses</td><td>3365</td><td>2796</td><td>2386</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>pre-taxearnings</td><td>$ 4211</td><td>$ 3785</td><td>$ 1694</td></tr></table> operating environment . during 2018 , our investments in private equities benefited from company-specific events , including sales , and strong corporate performance , while investments in public equities reflected losses , as global equity prices generally decreased . results for our investments in debt securities and loans reflected continued growth in loans receivables , resulting in higher net interest income . if macroeconomic concerns negatively affect corporate performance or the origination of loans , or if global equity prices continue to decline , net revenues in investing & lending would likely be negatively impacted . during 2017 , generally higher global equity prices and tighter credit spreads contributed to a favorable environment for our equity and debt investments . results also reflected net gains from company-specific events , including sales , and corporate performance . 2018 versus 2017 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 8.25 billion for 2018 , 14% ( 14 % ) higher than 2017 . net revenues in equity securities were $ 4.46 billion , 3% ( 3 % ) lower than 2017 , reflecting net losses from investments in public equities ( 2018 included $ 183 million of net losses ) compared with net gains in the prior year , partially offset by significantly higher net gains from investments in private equities ( 2018 included $ 4.64 billion of net gains ) , driven by company-specific events , including sales , and corporate performance . for 2018 , 60% ( 60 % ) of the net revenues in equity securities were generated from corporate investments and 40% ( 40 % ) were generated from real estate . net revenues in debt securities and loans were $ 3.80 billion , 43% ( 43 % ) higher than 2017 , primarily driven by significantly higher net interest income . 2018 included net interest income of approximately $ 2.70 billion compared with approximately $ 1.80 billion in 2017 . provision for credit losses was $ 674 million for 2018 , compared with $ 657 million for 2017 , as the higher provision for credit losses primarily related to consumer loan growth in 2018 was partially offset by an impairment of approximately $ 130 million on a secured loan in 2017 . operating expenses were $ 3.37 billion for 2018 , 20% ( 20 % ) higher than 2017 , primarily due to increased expenses related to consolidated investments and our digital lending and deposit platform , and increased compensation and benefits expenses , reflecting higher net revenues . pre-tax earnings were $ 4.21 billion in 2018 , 11% ( 11 % ) higher than 2017 versus 2016 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 7.24 billion for 2017 , 70% ( 70 % ) higher than 2016 . net revenues in equity securities were $ 4.58 billion , 78% ( 78 % ) higher than 2016 , primarily reflecting a significant increase in net gains from private equities ( 2017 included $ 3.82 billion of net gains ) , which were positively impacted by company-specific events and corporate performance . in addition , net gains from public equities ( 2017 included $ 762 million of net gains ) were significantly higher , as global equity prices increased during the year . for 2017 , 64% ( 64 % ) of the net revenues in equity securities were generated from corporate investments and 36% ( 36 % ) were generated from real estate . net revenues in debt securities and loans were $ 2.66 billion , 57% ( 57 % ) higher than 2016 , reflecting significantly higher net interest income ( 2017 included approximately $ 1.80 billion of net interest income ) . 60 goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k .\nQuestion: what is the net revenue in 2018?\nAnswer: 8250.0\nQuestion: what about in 2017?\nAnswer: 7238.0\nQuestion: what is the net change in revenue?\nAnswer: 1012.0\nQuestion: what is the net revenue in 2017?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "7238.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8160
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to the base rate increases and the volume/weather effect , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in demand coupled with an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of lower fuel refunds in 2011 versus 2010 , partially offset by a decrease in the average market price of natural gas . other regulatory charges decreased primarily due to the distribution in the first quarter 2011 of $ 17.4 million to customers of the 2007 rough production cost equalization remedy receipts . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rough production cost equalization proceedings . 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009 net revenue</td><td>$ 485.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>27.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>27.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rough production cost equalization</td><td>18.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>16.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>securitization transition charge</td><td>15.3</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-44.3 ( 44.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>-5.7 ( 5.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 540.2</td></tr></table> the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to increased sales to municipal and co-op customers due to the addition of new contracts . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , resulting from a 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) increase in customers , coupled with the effect of more favorable weather on residential sales . billed electricity usage increased a total of 777 gwh , or 5% ( 5 % ) . the rough production cost equalization variance is due to an additional $ 18.6 million allocation recorded in the second quarter of 2009 for 2007 rough production cost equalization receipts ordered by the puct to texas retail customers over what was originally allocated to entergy texas prior to the jurisdictional separation of entergy gulf states , inc . into entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas , effective december 2007 , as discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to rate actions , including an annual base rate increase of $ 59 million beginning august 2010 as a result of the settlement of the december 2009 rate case . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case settlement . the securitization transition charge variance is due to the issuance of securitization bonds . in november 2009 , entergy texas restoration funding , llc , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . the securitization transition charge is offset with a corresponding increase in interest on long-term debt with no impact on net income . see note 5 to the financial statements for further discussion of the securitization bond issuance. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in net revenue between 2009 and 2010?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "55.1"
}
] |
CONVFINQA4985
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncredit commitments and lines of credit the table below summarizes citigroup 2019s credit commitments : in millions of dollars u.s . outside of u.s . december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>u.s .</td><td>outside ofu.s .</td><td>december 312018</td><td>december 31 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>commercial and similar letters of credit</td><td>$ 823</td><td>$ 4638</td><td>$ 5461</td><td>$ 5000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>one- to four-family residential mortgages</td><td>1056</td><td>1615</td><td>2671</td><td>2674</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties</td><td>10019</td><td>1355</td><td>11374</td><td>12323</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>commercial real estate construction and land development</td><td>9565</td><td>1728</td><td>11293</td><td>11151</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>credit card lines</td><td>605857</td><td>90150</td><td>696007</td><td>678300</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>commercial and other consumer loan commitments</td><td>185849</td><td>102918</td><td>288767</td><td>272655</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other commitments and contingencies</td><td>2560</td><td>761</td><td>3321</td><td>3071</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total</td><td>$ 815729</td><td>$ 203165</td><td>$ 1018894</td><td>$ 985174</td></tr></table> the majority of unused commitments are contingent upon customers maintaining specific credit standards . commercial commitments generally have floating interest rates and fixed expiration dates and may require payment of fees . such fees ( net of certain direct costs ) are deferred and , upon exercise of the commitment , amortized over the life of the loan or , if exercise is deemed remote , amortized over the commitment period . commercial and similar letters of credit a commercial letter of credit is an instrument by which citigroup substitutes its credit for that of a customer to enable the customer to finance the purchase of goods or to incur other commitments . citigroup issues a letter on behalf of its client to a supplier and agrees to pay the supplier upon presentation of documentary evidence that the supplier has performed in accordance with the terms of the letter of credit . when a letter of credit is drawn , the customer is then required to reimburse citigroup . one- to four-family residential mortgages a one- to four-family residential mortgage commitment is a written confirmation from citigroup to a seller of a property that the bank will advance the specified sums enabling the buyer to complete the purchase . revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties are essentially home equity lines of credit . a home equity line of credit is a loan secured by a primary residence or second home to the extent of the excess of fair market value over the debt outstanding for the first mortgage . commercial real estate , construction and land development commercial real estate , construction and land development include unused portions of commitments to extend credit for the purpose of financing commercial and multifamily residential properties as well as land development projects . both secured-by-real-estate and unsecured commitments are included in this line , as well as undistributed loan proceeds , where there is an obligation to advance for construction progress payments . however , this line only includes those extensions of credit that , once funded , will be classified as total loans , net on the consolidated balance sheet . credit card lines citigroup provides credit to customers by issuing credit cards . the credit card lines are cancelable by providing notice to the cardholder or without such notice as permitted by local law . commercial and other consumer loan commitments commercial and other consumer loan commitments include overdraft and liquidity facilities as well as commercial commitments to make or purchase loans , purchase third-party receivables , provide note issuance or revolving underwriting facilities and invest in the form of equity . other commitments and contingencies other commitments and contingencies include committed or unsettled regular-way reverse repurchase agreements and all other transactions related to commitments and contingencies not reported on the lines above . unsettled reverse repurchase and securities lending agreements and unsettled repurchase and securities borrowing agreements in addition , in the normal course of business , citigroup enters into reverse repurchase and securities borrowing agreements , as well as repurchase and securities lending agreements , which settle at a future date . at december 31 , 2018 , and 2017 , citigroup had $ 36.1 billion and $ 35.0 billion unsettled reverse repurchase and securities borrowing agreements , respectively , and $ 30.7 billion and $ 19.1 billion unsettled repurchase and securities lending agreements , respectively . for a further discussion of securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities borrowed , and securities sold under agreements to repurchase and securities loaned , including the company 2019s policy for offsetting repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements , see note 11 to the consolidated financial statements. .\nQuestion: what is the total credit commitments and lines of credit in 2018?\nAnswer: 1018894.0\nQuestion: what about in 2017?\nAnswer: 985174.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "33720.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA9230
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmondavi produces , markets and sells premium , super-premium and fine california wines under the woodbridge by robert mondavi , robert mondavi private selection and robert mondavi winery brand names . woodbridge and robert mondavi private selection are the leading premium and super-premium wine brands by volume , respectively , in the united states . the acquisition of robert mondavi supports the company 2019s strategy of strengthening the breadth of its portfolio across price segments to capitalize on the overall growth in the pre- mium , super-premium and fine wine categories . the company believes that the acquired robert mondavi brand names have strong brand recognition globally . the vast majority of robert mondavi 2019s sales are generated in the united states . the company intends to leverage the robert mondavi brands in the united states through its selling , marketing and distribution infrastructure . the company also intends to further expand distribution for the robert mondavi brands in europe through its constellation europe infrastructure . the company and robert mondavi have complementary busi- nesses that share a common growth orientation and operating philosophy . the robert mondavi acquisition provides the company with a greater presence in the fine wine sector within the united states and the ability to capitalize on the broader geographic distribution in strategic international markets . the robert mondavi acquisition supports the company 2019s strategy of growth and breadth across categories and geographies , and strengthens its competitive position in its core markets . in par- ticular , the company believes there are growth opportunities for premium , super-premium and fine wines in the united kingdom , united states and other wine markets . total consid- eration paid in cash to the robert mondavi shareholders was $ 1030.7 million . additionally , the company expects to incur direct acquisition costs of $ 11.2 million . the purchase price was financed with borrowings under the company 2019s 2004 credit agreement ( as defined in note 9 ) . in accordance with the pur- chase method of accounting , the acquired net assets are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition . the purchase price was based primarily on the estimated future operating results of robert mondavi , including the factors described above , as well as an estimated benefit from operating cost synergies . the results of operations of the robert mondavi business are reported in the constellation wines segment and have been included in the consolidated statement of income since the acquisition date . the following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the robert mondavi acquisition at the date of acquisition . the company is in the process of obtaining third-party valuations of certain assets and liabilities , and refining its restructuring plan which is under development and will be finalized during the company 2019s year ending february 28 , 2006 ( see note19 ) . accordingly , the allocation of the purchase price is subject to refinement . estimated fair values at december 22 , 2004 , are as follows : {in thousands} . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>current assets</td><td>$ 494788</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property plant and equipment</td><td>452902</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other assets</td><td>178823</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trademarks</td><td>186000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>goodwill</td><td>590459</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>1902972</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>309051</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>long-term liabilities</td><td>552060</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total liabilities acquired</td><td>861111</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 1041861</td></tr></table> the trademarks are not subject to amortization . none of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . in connection with the robert mondavi acquisition and robert mondavi 2019s previously disclosed intention to sell certain of its winery properties and related assets , and other vineyard prop- erties , the company has classified certain assets as held for sale as of february 28 , 2005 . the company expects to sell these assets during the year ended february 28 , 2006 , for net pro- ceeds of approximately $ 150 million to $ 175 million . no gain or loss is expected to be recognized upon the sale of these assets . hardy acquisition 2013 on march 27 , 2003 , the company acquired control of brl hardy limited , now known as hardy wine company limited ( 201chardy 201d ) , and on april 9 , 2003 , the company completed its acquisition of all of hardy 2019s outstanding capital stock . as a result of the acquisition of hardy , the company also acquired the remaining 50% ( 50 % ) ownership of pacific wine partners llc ( 201cpwp 201d ) , the joint venture the company established with hardy in july 2001 . the acquisition of hardy along with the remaining interest in pwp is referred to together as the 201chardy acquisition . 201d through this acquisition , the company acquired one of australia 2019s largest wine producers with interests in winer- ies and vineyards in most of australia 2019s major wine regions as well as new zealand and the united states and hardy 2019s market- ing and sales operations in the united kingdom . total consideration paid in cash and class a common stock to the hardy shareholders was $ 1137.4 million . additionally , the company recorded direct acquisition costs of $ 17.2 million . the acquisition date for accounting purposes is march 27 , 2003 . the company has recorded a $ 1.6 million reduction in the purchase price to reflect imputed interest between the accounting acquisition date and the final payment of consider- ation . this charge is included as interest expense in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended february 29 , 2004 . the cash portion of the purchase price paid to the hardy shareholders and optionholders ( $ 1060.2 mil- lion ) was financed with $ 660.2 million of borrowings under the company 2019s then existing credit agreement and $ 400.0 million .\nQuestion: between the two acquisitions, was the purchase price for hardy greater than for mondavi?\nAnswer: yes\nQuestion: what portion of the net asset acquired is from goodwill?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "0.56673"
}
] |
CONVFINQA8185
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfuture impairments would be recorded in income from continuing operations . the statement provides specific guidance for testing goodwill for impairment . the company had $ 3.2 billion of goodwill at december 31 , 2001 . goodwill amortization was $ 62 million for the year ended december 31 , 2001 . the company is currently assessing the impact of sfas no . 142 on its financial position and results of operations . in june 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no . 143 , 2018 2018accounting for asset retirement obligations , 2019 2019 which addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs . this statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after june 15 , 2002 . the statement requires recognition of legal obligations associated with the retirement of a long-lived asset , except for certain obligations of lessees . the company is currently assessing the impact of sfas no . 143 on its financial position and results of operations . in december 2001 , the fasb revised its earlier conclusion , derivatives implementation group ( 2018 2018dig 2019 2019 ) issue c-15 , related to contracts involving the purchase or sale of electricity . contracts for the purchase or sale of electricity , both forward and option contracts , including capacity contracts , may qualify for the normal purchases and sales exemption and are not required to be accounted for as derivatives under sfas no . 133 . in order for contracts to qualify for this exemption , they must meet certain criteria , which include the requirement for physical delivery of the electricity to be purchased or sold under the contract only in the normal course of business . additionally , contracts that have a price based on an underlying that is not clearly and closely related to the electricity being sold or purchased or that are denominated in a currency that is foreign to the buyer or seller are not considered normal purchases and normal sales and are required to be accounted for as derivatives under sfas no . 133 . this revised conclusion is effective beginning april 1 , 2002 . the company is currently assessing the impact of revised dig issue c-15 on its financial condition and results of operations . 2001 compared to 2000 revenues revenues increased $ 1.8 billion , or 24% ( 24 % ) to $ 9.3 billion in 2001 from $ 7.5 billion in 2000 . the increase in revenues is due to the acquisition of new businesses , new operations from greenfield projects and positive improvements from existing operations . excluding businesses acquired or that commenced commercial operations in 2001 or 2000 , revenues increased 5% ( 5 % ) to $ 7.1 billion in 2001 . the following table shows the revenue of each segment: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td><td>% ( % ) change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>contract generation</td><td>$ 2.5 billion</td><td>$ 1.7 billion</td><td>47% ( 47 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>competitive supply</td><td>$ 2.7 billion</td><td>$ 2.4 billion</td><td>13% ( 13 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>large utilities</td><td>$ 2.4 billion</td><td>$ 2.1 billion</td><td>14% ( 14 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>growth distribution</td><td>$ 1.7 billion</td><td>$ 1.3 billion</td><td>31% ( 31 % )</td></tr></table> contract generation revenues increased $ 800 million , or 47% ( 47 % ) to $ 2.5 billion in 2001 from $ 1.7 billion in 2000 , principally resulting from the addition of revenues attributable to businesses acquired during 2001 or 2000 . excluding businesses acquired or that commenced commercial operations in 2001 or 2000 , contract generation revenues increased 2% ( 2 % ) to $ 1.7 billion in 2001 . the increase in contract generation segment revenues was due primarily to increases in south america , europe/africa and asia . in south america , contract generation segment revenues increased $ 472 million due mainly to the acquisition of gener and the full year of operations at uruguaiana offset by reduced revenues at tiete from the electricity rationing in brazil . in europe/africa , contract generation segment revenues increased $ 88 million , and the acquisition of a controlling interest in kilroot during 2000 was the largest contributor to the increase . in asia , contract generation segment revenues increased $ 96 million , and increased operations from our ecogen peaking plant was the most significant contributor to the .\nQuestion: what was the amount of goodwill in 2001, converted to the thousands?\nAnswer: 3200.0\nQuestion: and the goodwill amortization for that year?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "62.0"
}
] |
CONVFINQA6718
|
[
{
"role": "human",
"content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nlocation approximate size ( sq . ft. ) segment majority owned or leased . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>location</td><td>approximatesize ( sq . ft. )</td><td>segment</td><td>majorityowned orleased</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hamilton new zealand</td><td>96000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>calgary alberta canada</td><td>94000</td><td>global energy</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>kwinana australia</td><td>87000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>revesby australia</td><td>87000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>yangsan korea</td><td>85000</td><td>global energy global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>cisterna italy</td><td>80000</td><td>global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>rovigo italy</td><td>77000</td><td>global institutional</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>cuautitlan mexico</td><td>76000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>owned</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>barueri brazil</td><td>75000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>mullingar ireland</td><td>74000</td><td>global institutional global industrial</td><td>leased</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>mosta malta</td><td>73000</td><td>global institutional</td><td>leased</td></tr></table> generally , our manufacturing facilities are adequate to meet our existing in-house production needs . we continue to invest in our plant sites to maintain viable operations and to add capacity as necessary to meet business imperatives . most of our manufacturing plants also serve as distribution centers . in addition , we operate distribution centers around the world , most of which are leased , and utilize third party logistics service providers to facilitate the distribution of our products and services . at year end 2016 ecolab 2019s corporate headquarters was comprised of three adjacent multi-storied buildings located in downtown st . paul , minnesota . the main 19-story building was constructed to our specifications and is leased through june 30 , 2018 . the second building is leased through 2019 . the company intends to vacate the current leased buildings in 2018 . the third building is owned . ecolab acquired the 17-story north tower from the travelers indemnity company in downtown st . paul , minnesota on august 4 , 2015 . this building became the corporate headquarters in 2017 . a 90 acre campus in eagan , minnesota is owned and provides for future growth . the eagan facility houses a significant research and development center , a data center and training facilities as well as several of our administrative functions . we also have a significant business presence in naperville , illinois , where our water and paper operating segment maintain their principal administrative offices and research center . as discussed in part ii , item 8 , note 6 , 201cdebt and interest 201d of this form 10-k , the company acquired the beneficial interest in the trust owning these facilities during 2015 . our energy operating segment maintains administrative and research facilities in sugar land , texas and additional research facilities in fresno , texas . in december 2013 , we announced the construction of a new 133000 square-foot headquarters building adjacent to the existing sugar land operations which was completed in early 2016 and renovation of the existing 45000 square-foot research facilities in sugar land . significant regional administrative and/or research facilities are located in leiden , netherlands , campinas , brazil , and pune , india , which we own , and in monheim , germany , singapore , shanghai , china , and zurich , switzerland , which we lease . we also have a network of small leased sales offices in the united states and , to a lesser extent , in other parts of the world . item 3 . legal proceedings . discussion of legal proceedings is incorporated by reference from part ii , item 8 , note 15 , 201ccommitments and contingencies , 201d of this form 10-k and should be considered an integral part of part i , item 3 , 201clegal proceedings . 201d other environmental-related legal proceedings are discussed at part i , item 1 ( c ) above , under the heading 201cenvironmental and regulatory considerations 201d and is incorporated herein by reference . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable. .\nQuestion: how many square feet are leased by the company in barueri brazil?\nAnswer: 75000.0\nQuestion: and what is that number for mullingar ireland?\nAnswer: 74000.0\nQuestion: what is, then, the total square feet leased by the company in both locations?\nAnswer: 149000.0\nQuestion: and what is that number for mosta malta?\nAnswer: 73000.0\nQuestion: including, then, mosta malta, what becomes the total square feet leased for the three locations?\n"
},
{
"role": "agent",
"content": "222000.0"
}
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.