Split (3)

train · 11.1k rows

id stringlengths 10 14	entries listlengths 2 2
CONVFINQA10662	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncash and a commitment to fund the capital needs of the business until such time as its cumulative funding is equal to funding that we have provided from inception through the effective date of the transaction . the transaction created a new joint venture which does business as comercia global payments brazil . as a result of the transaction , we deconsolidated global payments brazil , and we apply the equity method of accounting to our retained interest in comercia global payments brazil . we recorded a gain on the transaction of $ 2.1 million which is included in interest and other income in the consolidated statement of income for the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2014 . the results of the brazil operation from inception until the restructuring into a joint venture on september 30 , 2013 were not material to our consolidated results of operations , and the assets and liabilities that we derecognized were not material to our consolidated balance sheet . american express portfolio on october 24 , 2013 , we acquired a merchant portfolio in the czech republic from american express limited for $ 1.9 million . the acquired assets have been classified as customer-related intangible assets and contract-based intangible assets with estimated amortization periods of 10 years . paypros on march 4 , 2014 , we completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding stock of payment processing , inc . ( 201cpaypros 201d ) for $ 420.0 million in cash plus $ 7.7 million in cash for working capital , subject to adjustment based on a final determination of working capital . we funded the acquisition with a combination of cash on hand and proceeds from our new term loan . paypros , based in california , is a provider of fully-integrated payment solutions for small-to-medium sized merchants in the united states . paypros delivers its products and services through a network of technology-based enterprise software partners to vertical markets that are complementary to the markets served by accelerated payment technologies ( 201capt 201d ) , which we acquired in october 2012 . we acquired paypros to expand our direct distribution capabilities in the united states and to further enhance our existing integrated solutions offerings . this acquisition was recorded as a business combination , and the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values . due to the timing of this transaction , the allocation of the purchase price is preliminary pending final valuation of intangible assets and deferred income taxes as well as resolution of the working capital settlement discussed above . the purchase price of paypros was determined by analyzing the historical and prospective financial statements . acquisition costs associated with this purchase were not material . the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocation ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 271577</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer-related intangible assets</td><td>147500</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contract-based intangible assets</td><td>31000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired technology</td><td>10700</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fixed assets</td><td>1680</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other assets</td><td>4230</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>466687</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>deferred income taxes</td><td>-38949 ( 38949 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 427738</td></tr></table> the preliminary purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill , included in the north america merchant services segment , of $ 271.6 million . such goodwill is attributable primarily to synergies with the services offered and markets served by paypros . the goodwill associated with the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes . the customer-related intangible assets and the contract-based intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 13 years . the acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 7 years. .\nQuestion: for the acquired technology segment, what was the expected annual amortization expense, in thousands?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1528.57143" } ]
CONVFINQA5746	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncross-border outstandings to countries in which we do business which amounted to at least 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets were as follows as of december 31 : 2007 2006 2005 ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united kingdom</td><td>$ 5951</td><td>$ 5531</td><td>$ 2696</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>canada</td><td>4565</td><td>2014</td><td>1463</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>australia</td><td>3567</td><td>1519</td><td>1441</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>netherlands</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>992</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>germany</td><td>2944</td><td>2696</td><td>4217</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total cross-border outstandings</td><td>$ 17027</td><td>$ 9746</td><td>$ 10809</td></tr></table> the total cross-border outstandings presented in the table represented 12% ( 12 % ) , 9% ( 9 % ) and 11% ( 11 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . there were no cross- border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 . aggregate cross-border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets at december 31 , 2006 , amounted to $ 1.05 billion ( canada ) and at december 31 , 2005 , amounted to $ 1.86 billion ( belgium and japan ) . capital regulatory and economic capital management both use key metrics evaluated by management to ensure that our actual level of capital is commensurate with our risk profile , is in compliance with all regulatory requirements , and is sufficient to provide us with the financial flexibility to undertake future strategic business initiatives . regulatory capital our objective with respect to regulatory capital management is to maintain a strong capital base in order to provide financial flexibility for our business needs , including funding corporate growth and supporting customers 2019 cash management needs , and to provide protection against loss to depositors and creditors . we strive to maintain an optimal level of capital , commensurate with our risk profile , on which an attractive return to shareholders will be realized over both the short and long term , while protecting our obligations to depositors and creditors and satisfying regulatory requirements . our capital management process focuses on our risk exposures , our capital position relative to our peers , regulatory capital requirements and the evaluations of the major independent credit rating agencies that assign ratings to our public debt . the capital committee , working in conjunction with the asset and liability committee , referred to as 2018 2018alco , 2019 2019 oversees the management of regulatory capital , and is responsible for ensuring capital adequacy with respect to regulatory requirements , internal targets and the expectations of the major independent credit rating agencies . the primary regulator of both state street and state street bank for regulatory capital purposes is the federal reserve board . both state street and state street bank are subject to the minimum capital requirements established by the federal reserve board and defined in the federal deposit insurance corporation improvement act of 1991 . state street bank must meet the regulatory capital thresholds for 2018 2018well capitalized 2019 2019 in order for the parent company to maintain its status as a financial holding company. .\nQuestion: what was the change in cross-border outstandings in the uk between 2006 and 2007?\nAnswer: 420.0\nQuestion: and the percentage change of this value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.07594" } ]
CONVFINQA3076	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstock performance graph * $ 100 invested on december 31 , 2011 in our stock or in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ended december 31 , 2016 . ( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana inc. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , goodyear tire & rubber co. , johnson controls international plc , lear corp. , lkq corp. , meritor inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc . company index december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company index</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>december 31 2013</td><td>december 31 2014</td><td>december 31 2015</td><td>december 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>delphi automotive plc ( 1 )</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 177.58</td><td>$ 283.02</td><td>$ 347.40</td><td>$ 414.58</td><td>$ 331.43</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 ( 2 )</td><td>100.00</td><td>116.00</td><td>153.58</td><td>174.60</td><td>177.01</td><td>198.18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>automotive supplier peer group ( 3 )</td><td>100.00</td><td>127.04</td><td>188.67</td><td>203.06</td><td>198.34</td><td>202.30</td></tr></table> dividends the company has declared and paid cash dividends of $ 0.25 and $ 0.29 per ordinary share in each quarter of 2015 and 2016 , respectively . in addition , in january 2017 , the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.29 per ordinary share , payable on february 15 , 2017 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 6 , 2017. .\nQuestion: what was the value of delphi automotive plc in the year of 2016?\nAnswer: 331.43\nQuestion: and what was the difference between that value in 2016 and the one in 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "231.43" } ]
CONVFINQA9187	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nutilized . in accordance with sfas no . 144 , accounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets , a non-cash impairment charge of $ 4.1 million was recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 for the excess machinery . this charge is included as a separate line item in the company 2019s consolidated statement of operations . there was no change to useful lives and related depreciation expense of the remaining assets as the company believes these estimates are currently reflective of the period the assets will be used in operations . 7 . warranties the company generally provides a one-year warranty on sequencing , genotyping and gene expression systems . at the time revenue is recognized , the company establishes an accrual for estimated warranty expenses associated with system sales . this expense is recorded as a component of cost of product revenue . estimated warranty expenses associated with extended maintenance contracts are recorded as cost of revenue ratably over the term of the maintenance contract . changes in the company 2019s reserve for product warranties from january 1 , 2006 through december 28 , 2008 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance as of january 1 2006</td><td>$ 751</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions charged to cost of revenue</td><td>1379</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>repairs and replacements</td><td>-1134 ( 1134 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance as of december 31 2006</td><td>996</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions charged to cost of revenue</td><td>4939</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>repairs and replacements</td><td>-2219 ( 2219 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance as of december 30 2007</td><td>3716</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>additions charged to cost of revenue</td><td>13044</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>repairs and replacements</td><td>-8557 ( 8557 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance as of december 28 2008</td><td>$ 8203</td></tr></table> 8 . convertible senior notes on february 16 , 2007 , the company issued $ 400.0 million principal amount of 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) convertible senior notes due 2014 ( the notes ) , which included the exercise of the initial purchasers 2019 option to purchase up to an additional $ 50.0 million aggregate principal amount of notes . the net proceeds from the offering , after deducting the initial purchasers 2019 discount and offering expenses , were $ 390.3 million . the company will pay 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) interest per annum on the principal amount of the notes , payable semi-annually in arrears in cash on february 15 and august 15 of each year . the company made interest payments of $ 1.3 million and $ 1.2 million on february 15 , 2008 and august 15 , 2008 , respectively . the notes mature on february 15 , the notes will be convertible into cash and , if applicable , shares of the company 2019s common stock , $ 0.01 par value per share , based on a conversion rate , subject to adjustment , of 45.8058 shares per $ 1000 principal amount of notes ( which represents a conversion price of $ 21.83 per share ) , only in the following circumstances and to the following extent : ( 1 ) during the five business-day period after any five consecutive trading period ( the measurement period ) in which the trading price per note for each day of such measurement period was less than 97% ( 97 % ) of the product of the last reported sale price of the company 2019s common stock and the conversion rate on each such day ; ( 2 ) during any calendar quarter after the calendar quarter ending march 30 , 2007 , if the last reported sale price of the company 2019s common stock for 20 or more trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately illumina , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what is the balance of reserve for product warranties as of december 28, 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "8203.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2727	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndish network corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued ciel ii . ciel ii , a canadian dbs satellite , was launched in december 2008 and commenced commercial operation during february 2009 . this satellite is accounted for as a capital lease and depreciated over the term of the satellite service agreement . we have leased 100% ( 100 % ) of the capacity on ciel ii for an initial 10 year term . as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , we had $ 500 million capitalized for the estimated fair value of satellites acquired under capital leases included in 201cproperty and equipment , net , 201d with related accumulated depreciation of $ 151 million and $ 109 million , respectively . in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) , we recognized $ 43 million , $ 43 million and $ 40 million in depreciation expense on satellites acquired under capital lease agreements during the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligation , together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of december 31 , 2011 are as follows ( in thousands ) : for the years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 84715</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>77893</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>76296</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>75970</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>75970</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>314269</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>705113</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>less : amount representing lease of the orbital location and estimated executory costs ( primarily insurance and maintenance ) including profit thereon included in total minimum lease payments</td><td>-323382 ( 323382 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net minimum lease payments</td><td>381731</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>less : amount representing interest</td><td>-109823 ( 109823 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>present value of net minimum lease payments</td><td>271908</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>less : current portion</td><td>-29202 ( 29202 )</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>long-term portion of capital lease obligations</td><td>$ 242706</td></tr></table> the summary of future maturities of our outstanding long-term debt as of december 31 , 2011 is included in the commitments table in note 16 . 12 . income taxes and accounting for uncertainty in income taxes income taxes our income tax policy is to record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported on our consolidated balance sheets , as well as probable operating loss , tax credit and other carryforwards . deferred tax assets are offset by valuation allowances when we believe it is more likely than not that net deferred tax assets will not be realized . we periodically evaluate our need for a valuation allowance . determining necessary valuation allowances requires us to make assessments about historical financial information as well as the timing of future events , including the probability of expected future taxable income and available tax planning opportunities . we file consolidated tax returns in the u.s . the income taxes of domestic and foreign subsidiaries not included in the u.s . tax group are presented in our consolidated financial statements based on a separate return basis for each tax paying entity . as of december 31 , 2011 , we had no net operating loss carryforwards ( 201cnols 201d ) for federal income tax purposes and $ 13 million of nol benefit for state income tax purposes . the state nols begin to expire in the year 2020 . in addition , there are $ 5 million of tax benefits related to credit carryforwards which are partially offset by a valuation allowance and $ 14 million benefit of capital loss carryforwards which are fully offset by a valuation allowance . the credit carryforwards begin to expire in the year 2012. .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2011, what percentage of the total future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligation were due after 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.4457" } ]
CONVFINQA8653	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nl iquidity and capital resources we have historically generated positive cash flow from operations and have generally used funds generated from operations and short-term borrowings on our revolving credit facility to meet capital requirements . we expect this trend to continue in the future . the company's cash and cash equivalents decreased to $ 65565 at june 30 , 2008 from $ 88617 at june 30 , 2007 . the following table summarizes net cash from operating activities in the statement of cash flows : year ended june 30 cash provided by operations increased $ 6754 to $ 181001 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2008 as compared to $ 174247 for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2007 . this increase is primarily attributable to an increase in expenses that do not have a corresponding cash outflow , such as depreciation and amortization , as a percentage of total net income . cash used in investing activities for the fiscal year ended june 2008 was $ 102148 and includes payments for acquisitions of $ 48109 , plus $ 1215 in contingent consideration paid on prior years 2019 acquisitions . during fiscal 2007 , payments for acquisitions totaled $ 34006 , plus $ 5301 paid on earn-outs and other acquisition adjustments . capital expenditures for fiscal 2008 were $ 31105 compared to $ 34202 for fiscal 2007 . cash used for software development in fiscal 2008 was $ 23736 compared to $ 20743 during the prior year . net cash used in financing activities for the current fiscal year was $ 101905 and includes the repurchase of 4200 shares of our common stock for $ 100996 , the payment of dividends of $ 24683 and $ 429 net repayment on our revolving credit facilities . cash used in financing activities was partially offset by proceeds of $ 20394 from the exercise of stock options and the sale of common stock and $ 3809 excess tax benefits from stock option exercises . during fiscal 2007 , net cash used in financing activities included the repurchase of our common stock for $ 98413 and the payment of dividends of $ 21685 . as in the current year , cash used in fiscal 2007 was partially offset by proceeds from the exercise of stock options and the sale of common stock of $ 29212 , $ 4640 excess tax benefits from stock option exercises and $ 19388 net borrowings on revolving credit facilities . at june 30 , 2008 , the company had negative working capital of $ 11418 ; however , the largest component of current liabilities was deferred revenue of $ 212375 . the cash outlay necessary to provide the services related to these deferred revenues is significantly less than this recorded balance . therefore , we do not anticipate any liquidity problems to result from this condition . u.s . financial markets and many of the largest u.s . financial institutions have recently been shaken by negative developments in the home mortgage industry and the mortgage markets , and particularly the markets for subprime mortgage-backed securities . while we believe it is too early to predict what effect , if any , these developments may have , we have not experienced any significant issues with our current collec- tion efforts , and we believe that any future impact to our liquidity would be minimized by our access to available lines of credit . 2008 2007 2006 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2007</td><td>year ended june 30 2008 2007</td><td>year ended june 30 2008 2007</td><td>year ended june 30 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 104222</td><td>$ 104681</td><td>$ 89923</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>non-cash expenses</td><td>70420</td><td>56348</td><td>52788</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>change in receivables</td><td>-2913 ( 2913 )</td><td>-28853 ( 28853 )</td><td>30413</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>change in deferred revenue</td><td>5100</td><td>24576</td><td>10561</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>change in other assets and liabilities</td><td>4172</td><td>17495</td><td>-14247 ( 14247 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net cash from operating activities</td><td>$ 181001</td><td>$ 174247</td><td>$ 169438</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is net change in cash and cash equivalents from 2007 to 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-23052.0" } ]
CONVFINQA10319	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nwestrock company notes to consolidated financial statements fffd ( continued ) at september 30 , 2018 and september 30 , 2017 , gross net operating losses for foreign reporting purposes of approximately $ 698.4 million and $ 673.7 million , respectively , were available for carryforward . a majority of these loss carryforwards generally expire between fiscal 2020 and 2038 , while a portion have an indefinite carryforward . the tax effected values of these net operating losses are $ 185.8 million and $ 182.6 million at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , exclusive of valuation allowances of $ 161.5 million and $ 149.6 million at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , we had state tax credit carryforwards of $ 64.8 million and $ 54.4 million , respectively . these state tax credit carryforwards generally expire within 5 to 10 years ; however , certain state credits can be carried forward indefinitely . valuation allowances of $ 56.1 million and $ 47.3 million at september 30 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , have been provided on these assets . these valuation allowances have been recorded due to uncertainty regarding our ability to generate sufficient taxable income in the appropriate taxing jurisdiction . the following table represents a summary of the valuation allowances against deferred tax assets for fiscal 2018 , 2017 and 2016 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of fiscal year</td><td>$ 219.1</td><td>$ 177.2</td><td>$ 100.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases</td><td>50.8</td><td>54.3</td><td>24.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>allowances related to purchase accounting ( 1 )</td><td>0.1</td><td>12.4</td><td>63.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions</td><td>-40.6 ( 40.6 )</td><td>-24.8 ( 24.8 )</td><td>-10.8 ( 10.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at end of fiscal year</td><td>$ 229.4</td><td>$ 219.1</td><td>$ 177.2</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amounts in fiscal 2018 and 2017 relate to the mps acquisition . adjustments in fiscal 2016 relate to the combination and the sp fiber acquisition . consistent with prior years , we consider a portion of our earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries as subject to repatriation and we provide for taxes accordingly . however , we consider the unremitted earnings and all other outside basis differences from all other foreign subsidiaries to be indefinitely reinvested . accordingly , we have not provided for any taxes that would be due . as of september 30 , 2018 , we estimate our outside basis difference in foreign subsidiaries that are considered indefinitely reinvested to be approximately $ 1.5 billion . the components of the outside basis difference are comprised of purchase accounting adjustments , undistributed earnings , and equity components . except for the portion of our earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries where we provided for taxes , we have not provided for any taxes that would be due upon the reversal of the outside basis differences . however , in the event of a distribution in the form of dividends or dispositions of the subsidiaries , we may be subject to incremental u.s . income taxes , subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits , and withholding taxes or income taxes payable to the foreign jurisdictions . as of september 30 , 2018 , the determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to any remaining undistributed foreign earnings not subject to the transition tax and additional outside basis differences is not practicable. .\nQuestion: what was the difference in the balance of deferred tax assets from 2016 to 2018?\nAnswer: 52.2\nQuestion: what was the value of the balance of deferred tax assets in 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "177.2" } ]
CONVFINQA11101	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntransfer agent and registrar for common stock the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is : computershare shareowner services llc 480 washington boulevard 29th floor jersey city , new jersey 07310 telephone : ( 877 ) 363-6398 sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2015 to december 31 , 2015 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>2140511</td><td>$ 20.54</td><td>2139507</td><td>$ 227368014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>1126378</td><td>$ 22.95</td><td>1124601</td><td>$ 201557625</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>1881992</td><td>$ 22.97</td><td>1872650</td><td>$ 158553178</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>5148881</td><td>$ 21.96</td><td>5136758</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 1004 withheld shares in october 2015 , 1777 withheld shares in november 2015 and 9342 withheld shares in december 2015 . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 in february 2015 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2015 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 12 , 2016 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining for repurchase under the 2015 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .\nQuestion: in october of 2015, what was the total amount spent in the repurchase of shares?\nAnswer: 43966095.94\nQuestion: and how much is that in millions?\nAnswer: 43.9661\nQuestion: and concerning the total amount of shares repurchased in the last three months of that year, what portion was due to december?\nAnswer: 0.36551\nQuestion: and what is that in percentage?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "36.55148" } ]
CONVFINQA8975	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table summarizes the changes in non-vested restricted stock awards for the year ended may 31 , 2009 ( share awards in thousands ) : share awards weighted average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>share awards</td><td>weighted average grant-date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-vested at may 31 2007</td><td>278</td><td>$ 37</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>400</td><td>38</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-136 ( 136 )</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>non-vested at may 31 2008</td><td>518</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>430</td><td>43</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested</td><td>-159 ( 159 )</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>non-vested at may 31 2009</td><td>762</td><td>42</td></tr></table> the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards granted in the years ended may 31 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 38 and $ 45 , respectively . the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 6.2 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 1.7 million , respectively . we recognized compensation expense for restricted stock of $ 9.0 million , $ 5.7 million , and $ 2.7 million in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . as of may 31 , 2009 , there was $ 23.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years . employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 2.4 million shares of our common stock has been authorized . employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25000 or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock . the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the last day of the quarterly purchase period . as of may 31 , 2009 , 0.8 million shares had been issued under this plan , with 1.6 million shares reserved for future issuance . the weighted average grant-date fair value of each designated share purchased under this plan was $ 6 , $ 6 and $ 8 in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . these values represent the fair value of the 15% ( 15 % ) discount . note 12 2014segment information general information during fiscal 2009 , we began assessing our operating performance using a new segment structure . we made this change as a result of our june 30 , 2008 acquisition of 51% ( 51 % ) of hsbc merchant services llp in the united kingdom , in addition to anticipated future international expansion . beginning with the quarter ended august 31 , 2008 , the reportable segments are defined as north america merchant services , international merchant services , and money transfer . the following tables reflect these changes and such reportable segments for fiscal years 2009 , 2008 , and 2007. .\nQuestion: as of may 31, 2009, what was the total value of the non-vested shares, in thousands?\nAnswer: 32004.0\nQuestion: and what is that in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "32.004" } ]
CONVFINQA4529	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nkorea engineering plastics co. , ltd . founded in 1987 , kepco is the leading producer of pom in south korea . kepco is a venture between celanese's ticona business ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) , mitsubishi gas chemical company , inc . ( 40% ( 40 % ) ) and mitsubishi corporation ( 10% ( 10 % ) ) . kepco has polyacetal production facilities in ulsan , south korea , compounding facilities for pbt and nylon in pyongtaek , south korea , and participates with polyplastics and mitsubishi gas chemical company , inc . in a world-scale pom facility in nantong , china . polyplastics co. , ltd . polyplastics is a leading supplier of engineered plastics in the asia-pacific region and is a venture between daicel chemical industries ltd. , japan ( 55% ( 55 % ) ) , and celanese's ticona business ( 45% ( 45 % ) ) . established in 1964 , polyplastics is a producer and marketer of pom and lcp in the asia-pacific region , with principal production facilities located in japan , taiwan , malaysia and china . fortron industries llc . fortron is a leading global producer of polyphenylene sulfide ( 201cpps 201d ) , sold under the fortron ae brand , which is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications , especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance . established in 1992 , fortron is a limited liability company whose members are ticona fortron inc . ( 50% ( 50 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of cna holdings , llc ) and kureha corporation ( 50% ( 50 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of kureha chemical industry co. , ltd . of japan ) . fortron's facility is located in wilmington , north carolina . this venture combines the sales , marketing , distribution , compounding and manufacturing expertise of celanese with the pps polymer technology expertise of kureha . china acetate strategic ventures . we hold an approximate 30% ( 30 % ) ownership interest in three separate acetate production ventures in china . these include the nantong cellulose fibers co . ltd. , kunming cellulose fibers co . ltd . and zhuhai cellulose fibers co . ltd . the china national tobacco corporation , the chinese state-owned tobacco entity , controls the remaining ownership interest in each of these ventures . with an estimated 30% ( 30 % ) share of the world's cigarette production and consumption , china is the world's largest and fastest growing area for acetate tow products according to the 2009 stanford research institute international chemical economics handbook . combined , these ventures are a leader in chinese domestic acetate production and are well positioned to supply chinese cigarette producers . in december 2009 , we announced plans with china national tobacco to expand our acetate flake and tow capacity at our venture's nantong facility and we received formal approval for the expansions , each by 30000 tons , during 2010 . since their inception in 1986 , the china acetate ventures have completed 12 expansions , leading to earnings growth and increased dividends . our chinese acetate ventures fund their operations using operating cash flow . during 2011 , we made contributions of $ 8 million related to the capacity expansions in nantong and have committed contributions of $ 9 million in 2012 . in 2010 , we made contributions of $ 12 million . our chinese acetate ventures pay a dividend in the second quarter of each fiscal year , based on the ventures' performance for the preceding year . in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we received cash dividends of $ 78 million , $ 71 million and $ 56 million , respectively . although our ownership interest in each of our china acetate ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states ( 201cus gaap 201d ) . 2022 other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several infraserv groups in germany that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . the table below represents our equity investments in infraserv ventures as of december 31 , 2011: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>ownership % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the total of cash dividends in 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "78.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8479	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) detail with respect to our investment portfolio as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 is provided in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 of this form 10-k . loans and leases averaged $ 15.91 billion for the year ended 2014 , up from $ 13.78 billion in 2013 . the increase was mainly related to mutual fund lending and our continued investment in senior secured bank loans . mutual fund lending and senior secured bank loans averaged approximately $ 9.12 billion and $ 1.40 billion , respectively , for the year ended december 31 , 2014 compared to $ 8.16 billion and $ 170 million for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , respectively . average loans and leases also include short- duration advances . table 13 : u.s . and non-u.s . short-duration advances years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>average u.s . short-duration advances</td><td>$ 2355</td><td>$ 2356</td><td>$ 1972</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average non-u.s . short-duration advances</td><td>1512</td><td>1393</td><td>1393</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>average total short-duration advances</td><td>$ 3867</td><td>$ 3749</td><td>$ 3365</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average short-durance advances to average loans and leases</td><td>24% ( 24 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td><td>29% ( 29 % )</td></tr></table> average u.s . short-duration advances $ 2355 $ 2356 $ 1972 average non-u.s . short-duration advances 1512 1393 1393 average total short-duration advances $ 3867 $ 3749 $ 3365 average short-durance advances to average loans and leases 24% ( 24 % ) 27% ( 27 % ) 29% ( 29 % ) the decline in proportion of the average daily short-duration advances to average loans and leases is primarily due to growth in the other segments of the loan and lease portfolio . short-duration advances provide liquidity to clients in support of their investment activities . although average short-duration advances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 increased compared to the year ended december 31 , 2013 , such average advances remained low relative to historical levels , mainly the result of clients continuing to hold higher levels of liquidity . average other interest-earning assets increased to $ 15.94 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 11.16 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 . the increased levels were primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral provided in connection with our enhanced custody business . aggregate average interest-bearing deposits increased to $ 130.30 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 109.25 billion for year ended 2013 . the higher levels were primarily the result of increases in both u.s . and non-u.s . transaction accounts and time deposits . future transaction account levels will be influenced by the underlying asset servicing business , as well as market conditions , including the general levels of u.s . and non-u.s . interest rates . average other short-term borrowings increased to $ 4.18 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 3.79 billion for the year ended 2013 . the increase was the result of a higher level of client demand for our commercial paper . the decline in rates paid from 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) in 2013 to 0.1% ( 0.1 % ) in 2014 resulted from a reclassification of certain derivative contracts that hedge our interest-rate risk on certain assets and liabilities , which reduced interest revenue and interest expense . average long-term debt increased to $ 9.31 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 8.42 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 . the increase primarily reflected the issuance of $ 1.5 billion of senior and subordinated debt in may 2013 , $ 1.0 billion of senior debt issued in november 2013 , and $ 1.0 billion of senior debt issued in december 2014 . this is partially offset by the maturities of $ 500 million of senior debt in may 2014 and $ 250 million of senior debt in march 2014 . average other interest-bearing liabilities increased to $ 7.35 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2014 from $ 6.46 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral received from clients in connection with our enhanced custody business . several factors could affect future levels of our net interest revenue and margin , including the mix of client liabilities ; actions of various central banks ; changes in u.s . and non-u.s . interest rates ; changes in the various yield curves around the world ; revised or proposed regulatory capital or liquidity standards , or interpretations of those standards ; the amount of discount accretion generated by the former conduit securities that remain in our investment securities portfolio ; and the yields earned on securities purchased compared to the yields earned on securities sold or matured . based on market conditions and other factors , we continue to reinvest the majority of the proceeds from pay-downs and maturities of investment securities in highly-rated securities , such as u.s . treasury and agency securities , municipal securities , federal agency mortgage-backed securities and u.s . and non-u.s . mortgage- and asset-backed securities . the pace at which we continue to reinvest and the types of investment securities purchased will depend on the impact of market conditions and other factors over time . we expect these factors and the levels of global interest rates to influence what effect our reinvestment program will have on future levels of our net interest revenue and net interest margin. .\nQuestion: what was the loan amount in 2014, in millions?\nAnswer: 15.91\nQuestion: and what was it in 2013, also in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "13.78" } ]
CONVFINQA7061	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents part ii , item 8 schlumberger limited ( schlumberger n.v. , incorporated in the netherlands antilles ) and subsidiary companies shares of common stock issued treasury shares outstanding . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>issued</td><td>in treasury</td><td>shares outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1 2001</td><td>667085793</td><td>-94361099 ( 94361099 )</td><td>572724694</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>1752833</td><td>1752833</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares granted to directors</td><td>2013</td><td>4800</td><td>4800</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>shares sold to optionees</td><td>8385</td><td>1399686</td><td>1408071</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance december 31 2001</td><td>667094178</td><td>-91203780 ( 91203780 )</td><td>575890398</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2677842</td><td>2677842</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>shares granted to directors</td><td>2013</td><td>3500</td><td>3500</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>shares sold to optionees</td><td>10490</td><td>2243400</td><td>2253890</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>acquisition of technoguide</td><td>2013</td><td>1347485</td><td>1347485</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>balance december 31 2002</td><td>667104668</td><td>-84931553 ( 84931553 )</td><td>582173115</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2464088</td><td>2464088</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>shares granted to directors</td><td>2013</td><td>3500</td><td>3500</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>shares sold to optionees</td><td>1320</td><td>1306305</td><td>1307625</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>balance december 31 2003</td><td>667105988</td><td>-81157660 ( 81157660 )</td><td>585948328</td></tr></table> see the notes to consolidated financial statements 39 / slb 2003 form 10-k .\nQuestion: what percentage of the shares outstanding did the the acquisition of technoguide account for?\nAnswer: 0.00231\nQuestion: and during this same period, what was the total amount of shares issued to directors?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "11800.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8293	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 9 . retirement plan we maintain a defined contribution pension plan covering full-time shoreside employees who have completed the minimum period of continuous service . annual contributions to the plan are based on fixed percentages of participants 2019 salaries and years of service , not to exceed certain maximums . pension cost was $ 13.9 million , $ 12.8 million and $ 12.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . note 10 . income taxes we and the majority of our subsidiaries are currently exempt from united states corporate tax on income from the international opera- tion of ships pursuant to section 883 of the internal revenue code . income tax expense related to our remaining subsidiaries was not significant for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 . final regulations under section 883 were published on august 26 , 2003 , and were effective for the year ended december 31 , 2005 . these regulations confirmed that we qualify for the exemption provid- ed by section 883 , but also narrowed the scope of activities which are considered by the internal revenue service to be incidental to the international operation of ships . the activities listed in the regula- tions as not being incidental to the international operation of ships include income from the sale of air and other transportation such as transfers , shore excursions and pre and post cruise tours . to the extent the income from such activities is earned from sources within the united states , such income will be subject to united states taxa- tion . the application of these new regulations reduced our net income for the years ended december 31 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 by approximately $ 6.3 million and $ 14.0 million , respectively . note 11 . financial instruments the estimated fair values of our financial instruments are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 104520</td><td>$ 125385</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>long-term debt ( including current portion of long-term debt )</td><td>-5474988 ( 5474988 )</td><td>-4368874 ( 4368874 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign currency forward contracts in a net ( loss ) gain position</td><td>104159</td><td>-115415 ( 115415 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>interest rate swap agreements in a net receivable position</td><td>5856</td><td>8456</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fuel swap agreements in a net payable position</td><td>-20456 ( 20456 )</td><td>-78 ( 78 )</td></tr></table> long-term debt ( including current portion of long-term debt ) ( 5474988 ) ( 4368874 ) foreign currency forward contracts in a net ( loss ) gain position 104159 ( 115415 ) interest rate swap agreements in a net receivable position 5856 8456 fuel swap agreements in a net payable position ( 20456 ) ( 78 ) the reported fair values are based on a variety of factors and assumptions . accordingly , the fair values may not represent actual values of the financial instruments that could have been realized as of december 31 , 2006 or 2005 , or that will be realized in the future and do not include expenses that could be incurred in an actual sale or settlement . our financial instruments are not held for trading or speculative purposes . our exposure under foreign currency contracts , interest rate and fuel swap agreements is limited to the cost of replacing the contracts in the event of non-performance by the counterparties to the contracts , all of which are currently our lending banks . to minimize this risk , we select counterparties with credit risks acceptable to us and we limit our exposure to an individual counterparty . furthermore , all foreign currency forward contracts are denominated in primary currencies . cash and cash equivalents the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents approximate their fair values due to the short maturity of these instruments . long-term debt the fair values of our senior notes and senior debentures were esti- mated by obtaining quoted market prices . the fair values of all other debt were estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on market rates available to us for similar debt with the same remaining maturities . foreign currency contracts the fair values of our foreign currency forward contracts were esti- mated using current market prices for similar instruments . our expo- sure to market risk for fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates relates to six ship construction contracts and forecasted transactions . we use foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates . as of december 31 , 2006 , we had foreign currency forward contracts in a notional amount of $ 3.8 billion maturing through 2009 . as of december 31 , 2006 , the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts related to the six ship construction contracts , which are designated as fair value hedges , was a net unrealized gain of approximately $ 106.3 mil- lion . at december 31 , 2005 , the fair value of our foreign currency for- ward contracts related to three ship construction contracts , designated as fair value hedges , was a net unrealized loss of approx- imately $ 103.4 million . the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts related to the other ship construction contract at december 31 , 2005 , which was designated as a cash flow hedge , was an unre- alized loss , of approximately $ 7.8 million . at december 31 , 2006 , approximately 11% ( 11 % ) of the aggregate cost of the ships was exposed to fluctuations in the euro exchange rate . r o y a l c a r i b b e a n c r u i s e s l t d . 3 5 notes to the consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 51392_financials-v9.qxp 6/7/07 3:40 pm page 35 .\nQuestion: what was the total of cash and cash equivalents in 2006?\nAnswer: 104520.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2005?\nAnswer: 125385.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the combined total of cash and cash equivalents for both of those years?\nAnswer: 229905.0\nQuestion: and what was the total of long-term debt in that same period?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "9843862.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7972	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 192.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>42.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>25.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rider revenue</td><td>8.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>-41.2 ( 41.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>3.3</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 231.0</td></tr></table> the fuel recovery variance is due to the inclusion of grand gulf costs in fuel recoveries effective july 1 , 2006 . in june 2006 , the city council approved the recovery of grand gulf costs through the fuel adjustment clause , without a corresponding change in base rates ( a significant portion of grand gulf costs was previously recovered through base rates ) . the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 . the first quarter 2006 was affected by customer losses following hurricane katrina . entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers have returned and are taking service as of december 31 , 2007 , compared to approximately 95000 electric customers and 65000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2006 . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 540 gwh compared to the same period in 2006 , an increase of 14% ( 14 % ) . the rider revenue variance is due primarily to a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 . the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account . the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the net wholesale revenue variance is due to more energy available for resale in 2006 due to the decrease in retail usage caused by customer losses following hurricane katrina . in addition , 2006 revenue includes the sales into the wholesale market of entergy new orleans' share of the output of grand gulf , pursuant to city council approval of measures proposed by entergy new orleans to address the reduction in entergy new orleans' retail customer usage caused by hurricane katrina and to provide revenue support for the costs of entergy new orleans' share of grand other income statement variances 2008 compared to 2007 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a provision for storm-related bad debts of $ 11 million recorded in 2007 ; a decrease of $ 6.2 million in legal and professional fees ; a decrease of $ 3.4 million in employee benefit expenses ; and a decrease of $ 1.9 million in gas operations spending due to higher labor and material costs for reliability work in 2007. .\nQuestion: what was the 2007 net revenue?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "231.0" } ]
CONVFINQA862	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nreinvested for continued use in foreign operations . if the total undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries were remitted , a significant amount of the additional tax would be offset by the allowable foreign tax credits . it is not practical for us to determine the additional tax of remitting these earnings . in september 2007 , we reached a settlement with the united states department of justice to resolve an investigation into financial relationships between major orthopaedic manufacturers and consulting orthopaedic surgeons . under the terms of the settlement , we paid a civil settlement amount of $ 169.5 million and we recorded an expense in that amount . at the time , no tax benefit was recorded related to the settlement expense due to the uncertainty as to the tax treatment . during the third quarter of 2008 , we reached an agreement with the u.s . internal revenue service ( irs ) confirming the deductibility of a portion of the settlement payment . as a result , during 2008 we recorded a current tax benefit of $ 31.7 million . in june 2006 , the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) issued interpretation no . 48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes 2013 an interpretation of fasb statement no . 109 , accounting for income taxes ( fin 48 ) . fin 48 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements . under fin 48 , we may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities , based on the technical merits of the position . the tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement . fin 48 also provides guidance on derecognition , classification , interest and penalties on income taxes , accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures . we adopted fin 48 on january 1 , 2007 . prior to the adoption of fin 48 we had a long term tax liability for expected settlement of various federal , state and foreign income tax liabilities that was reflected net of the corollary tax impact of these expected settlements of $ 102.1 million , as well as a separate accrued interest liability of $ 1.7 million . as a result of the adoption of fin 48 , we are required to present the different components of such liability on a gross basis versus the historical net presentation . the adoption resulted in the financial statement liability for unrecognized tax benefits decreasing by $ 6.4 million as of january 1 , 2007 . the adoption resulted in this decrease in the liability as well as a reduction to retained earnings of $ 4.8 million , a reduction in goodwill of $ 61.4 million , the establishment of a tax receivable of $ 58.2 million , which was recorded in other current and non-current assets on our consolidated balance sheet , and an increase in an interest/penalty payable of $ 7.9 million , all as of january 1 , 2007 . therefore , after the adoption of fin 48 , the amount of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 95.7 million as of january 1 , 2007 . as of december 31 , 2008 , the amount of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 129.5 million . of this amount , $ 45.5 million would impact our effective tax rate if recognized . $ 38.2 million of the $ 129.5 million liability for unrecognized tax benefits relate to tax positions of acquired entities taken prior to their acquisition by us . under fas 141 ( r ) , if these liabilities are settled for different amounts , they will affect the income tax expense in the period of reversal or settlement . the following is a tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 135.2</td><td>$ 95.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases related to prior periods</td><td>12.1</td><td>27.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>decreases related to prior periods</td><td>-32.0 ( 32.0 )</td><td>-5.5 ( 5.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increases related to current period</td><td>15.8</td><td>21.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-1.3 ( 1.3 )</td><td>-1.3 ( 1.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>decreases related to lapse of statue of limitations</td><td>-0.3 ( 0.3 )</td><td>-3.0 ( 3.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 129.5</td><td>$ 135.2</td></tr></table> we recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of earnings , which is consistent with the recognition of these items in prior reporting periods . as of december 31 , 2007 , we recorded a liability of $ 19.6 million for accrued interest and penalties , of which $ 14.7 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized . the amount of this liability is $ 22.9 million as of december 31 , 2008 . of this amount , $ 17.1 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized . we expect that the amount of tax liability for unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next twelve months ; however , we do not expect these changes will have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial position . the u.s . federal statute of limitations remains open for the year 2003 and onward . the u.s . federal returns for years 2003 and 2004 are currently under examination by the irs . on july 15 , 2008 , the irs issued its examination report . we filed a formal protest on august 15 , 2008 and requested a conference with the appeals office regarding disputed issues . although the appeals process could take several years , we do not anticipate resolution of the audit will result in any significant impact on our results of operations , financial position or cash flows . in addition , for the 1999 tax year of centerpulse , which we acquired in october 2003 , one issue remains in dispute . state income tax returns are generally subject to examination for a period of 3 to 5 years after filing of the respective return . the state impact of any federal changes remains subject to examination by various states for a period of up to one year after formal notification to the states . we have various state income tax returns in the process of examination , administrative appeals or litigation . it is z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 8 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg* transmitting job : c48761 pcn : 057000000 *%%pcmsg\|57 \|00010\|yes\|no\|02/24/2009 06:10\|0\|0\|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d\| .\nQuestion: what is the balance of unrecognized tax benefits in 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "129.5" } ]
CONVFINQA3277	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction , and various states and foreign jurisdictions . with few exceptions , the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state and local , or non-u.s . income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 1999 . it is anticipated that its examination for the company 2019s u.s . income tax returns for the years 2002 through 2004 will be completed by the end of first quarter 2008 . as of december 31 , 2007 , the irs has proposed adjustments to the company 2019s tax positions for which the company is fully reserved . payments relating to any proposed assessments arising from the 2002 through 2004 audit may not be made until a final agreement is reached between the company and the irs on such assessments or upon a final resolution resulting from the administrative appeals process or judicial action . in addition to the u.s . federal examination , there is also limited audit activity in several u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . currently , the company expects the liability for unrecognized tax benefits to change by an insignificant amount during the next 12 months . the company adopted the provisions of fasb interpretation no . 48 , 201caccounting for uncertainty in income taxes , 201d on january 1 , 2007 . as a result of the implementation of interpretation 48 , the company recognized an immaterial increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits , which was accounted for as a reduction to the january 1 , 2007 , balance of retained earnings . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits ( 201cutb 201d ) is as follows : ( millions ) federal , state , and foreign tax . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>federal state and foreign tax</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross utb balance at january 1 2007</td><td>$ 691</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>143</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-189 ( 189 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-20 ( 20 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>gross utb balance at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 680</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net utb impacting the effective tax rate at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 334</td></tr></table> the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate as of january 1 , 2007 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are $ 261 million and $ 334 million . the ending net utb results from adjusting the gross balance at december 31 , 2007 for items such as federal , state , and non-u.s . deferred items , interest and penalties , and deductible taxes . the net utb is included as components of accrued income taxes and other liabilities within the consolidated balance sheet . the company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense . at january 1 , 2007 and december 31 , 2007 , accrued interest and penalties on a gross basis were $ 65 million and $ 69 million , respectively . included in these interest and penalty amounts is interest and penalties related to tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility . because of the impact of deferred tax accounting , other than interest and penalties , the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period . in 2007 , the company completed the preparation and filing of its 2006 u.s . federal and state income tax returns , which did not result in any material changes to the company 2019s financial position . in 2006 , an audit of the company 2019s u.s . tax returns for years through 2001 was completed . the company and the internal revenue service reached a final settlement for these years , including an agreement on the amount of a refund claim to be filed by the company . the company also substantially resolved audits in certain european countries . in addition , the company completed the preparation and filing of its 2005 u.s . federal income tax return and the corresponding 2005 state income tax returns . the adjustments from amounts previously estimated in the u.s . federal and state income tax returns ( both positive and negative ) included lower u.s . taxes on dividends received from the company's foreign subsidiaries . the company also made quarterly adjustments ( both positive and negative ) to its reserves for tax contingencies . considering the developments noted above and other factors , including the impact on open audit years of the recent resolution of issues in various audits , these reassessments resulted in a reduction of the reserves in 2006 by $ 149 million , inclusive of the expected amount of certain refund claims . in 2005 , the company announced its intent to reinvest $ 1.7 billion of foreign earnings in the united states pursuant to the provisions of the american jobs creation act of 2004 . this act provided the company the opportunity to tax- .\nQuestion: what was the value of accrued interest and penalties on a gross basis as of 1/1/07?\nAnswer: 65.0\nQuestion: and for the period as of 12/31/07?\nAnswer: 69.0\nQuestion: combining these two values, what is the total?\nAnswer: 134.0\nQuestion: and the gross utb balance as of 1/107?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "691.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4827	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nbetween the actual return on plan assets compared to the expected return on plan assets ( u.s . pension plans had an actual rate of return of 7.8 percent compared to an expected rate of return of 6.9 percent ) . 2022 2015 net mark-to-market loss of $ 179 million - primarily due to the difference between the actual return on plan assets compared to the expected return on plan assets ( u.s . pension plans had an actual rate of return of ( 2.0 ) percent compared to an expected rate of return of 7.4 percent ) which was partially offset by higher discount rates at the end of 2015 compared to 2014 . the net mark-to-market losses were in the following results of operations line items: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions of dollars )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cost of goods sold</td><td>$ -29 ( 29 )</td><td>$ 476</td><td>$ 122</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>selling general and administrative expenses</td><td>244</td><td>382</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>research and development expenses</td><td>86</td><td>127</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 301</td><td>$ 985</td><td>$ 179</td></tr></table> effective january 1 , 2018 , we adopted new accounting guidance issued by the fasb related to the presentation of net periodic pension and opeb costs . this guidance requires that an employer disaggregate the service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost . service cost is required to be reported in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period . the other components of net benefit cost are required to be reported outside the subtotal for income from operations . as a result , components of pension and opeb costs , other than service costs , will be reclassified from operating costs to other income/expense . this change will be applied retrospectively to prior years . in the fourth quarter of 2017 , the company reviewed and made changes to the mortality assumptions primarily for our u.s . pension plans which resulted in an overall increase in the life expectancy of plan participants . as of december 31 , 2017 these changes resulted in an increase in our liability for postemployment benefits of approximately $ 290 million . in the fourth quarter of 2016 , the company adopted new mortality improvement scales released by the soa for our u.s . pension and opeb plans . as of december 31 , 2016 , this resulted in an increase in our liability for postemployment benefits of approximately $ 200 million . in the first quarter of 2017 , we announced the closure of our gosselies , belgium facility . this announcement impacted certain employees that participated in a defined benefit pension plan and resulted in a curtailment and the recognition of termination benefits . in march 2017 , we recognized a net loss of $ 20 million for the curtailment and termination benefits . in addition , we announced the decision to phase out production at our aurora , illinois , facility , which resulted in termination benefits of $ 9 million for certain hourly employees that participate in our u.s . hourly defined benefit pension plan . beginning in 2016 , we elected to utilize a full yield curve approach in the estimation of service and interest costs by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve used in the determination of the benefit obligation to the relevant projected cash flows . service and interest costs in 2017 and 2016 were lower by $ 140 million and $ 180 million , respectively , under the new method than they would have been under the previous method . this change had no impact on our year-end defined benefit pension and opeb obligations or our annual net periodic benefit cost as the lower service and interest costs were entirely offset in the actuarial loss ( gain ) reported for the respective year . we expect our total defined benefit pension and opeb expense ( excluding the impact of mark-to-market gains and losses ) to decrease approximately $ 80 million in 2018 . this decrease is primarily due to a higher expected return on plan assets as a result of a higher asset base in 2018 . in general , our strategy for both the u.s . and the non-u.s . pensions includes ongoing alignment of our investments to our liabilities , while reducing risk in our portfolio . for our u.s . pension plans , our year-end 2017 asset allocation was 34 a0percent equities , 62 a0percent fixed income and 4 percent other . our current u.s . pension target asset allocation is 30 percent equities and 70 percent fixed income . the target allocation is revisited periodically to ensure it reflects our overall objectives . the u.s . plans are rebalanced to plus or minus 5 percentage points of the target asset allocation ranges on a monthly basis . the year-end 2017 asset allocation for our non-u.s . pension plans was 40 a0percent equities , 53 a0percent fixed income , 4 a0percent real estate and 3 percent other . the 2017 weighted-average target allocations for our non-u.s . pension plans was 38 a0percent equities , 54 a0percent fixed income , 5 a0percent real estate and 3 a0percent other . the target allocations for each plan vary based upon local statutory requirements , demographics of the plan participants and funded status . the frequency of rebalancing for the non-u.s . plans varies depending on the plan . contributions to our pension and opeb plans were $ 1.6 billion and $ 329 million in 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the 2017 contributions include a $ 1.0 billion discretionary contribution made to our u.s . pension plans in december 2017 . we expect to make approximately $ 365 million of contributions to our pension and opeb plans in 2018 . we believe we have adequate resources to fund both pension and opeb plans . 48 \| 2017 form 10-k .\nQuestion: what was the total of pension and opb contributions in 2017, in millions?\nAnswer: 1600.0\nQuestion: and what was the change in that total from 2017 to 2018?\nAnswer: -1235.0\nQuestion: how much, then, does this change represent in relation to the 2017 total?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.77187" } ]
CONVFINQA6694	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 10 . commitments and contingencies credit-related commitments and contingencies : credit-related financial instruments , which are off-balance sheet , include indemnified securities financing , unfunded commitments to extend credit or purchase assets , and standby letters of credit . the potential loss associated with indemnified securities financing , unfunded commitments and standby letters of credit is equal to the total gross contractual amount , which does not consider the value of any collateral . the following table summarizes the total gross contractual amounts of credit-related off-balance sheet financial instruments at december 31 . amounts reported do not reflect participations to independent third parties. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indemnified securities financing</td><td>$ 365251</td><td>$ 324590</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>asset purchase agreements ( 1 )</td><td>8211</td><td>31780</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>unfunded commitments to extend credit</td><td>18078</td><td>20981</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit</td><td>4784</td><td>6061</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amount for 2009 excludes agreements related to the commercial paper conduits , which were consolidated in may 2009 ; see note 11 . approximately 81% ( 81 % ) of the unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year from the date of issue . since many of these commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements . securities finance : on behalf of our customers , we lend their securities to creditworthy brokers and other institutions . we generally indemnify our customers for the fair market value of those securities against a failure of the borrower to return such securities . collateral funds received in connection with our securities finance services are held by us as agent and are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . we require the borrowers to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the securities borrowed . the borrowed securities are revalued daily to determine if additional collateral is necessary . in this regard , we held , as agent , cash and u.s . government securities with an aggregate fair value of $ 375.92 billion and $ 333.07 billion as collateral for indemnified securities on loan at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , presented in the table above . the collateral held by us is invested on behalf of our customers in accordance with their guidelines . in certain cases , the collateral is invested in third-party repurchase agreements , for which we indemnify the customer against loss of the principal invested . we require the repurchase agreement counterparty to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the amount of the repurchase agreement . the indemnified repurchase agreements and the related collateral are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . of the collateral of $ 375.92 billion at december 31 , 2009 and $ 333.07 billion at december 31 , 2008 referenced above , $ 77.73 billion at december 31 , 2009 and $ 68.37 billion at december 31 , 2008 was invested in indemnified repurchase agreements . we held , as agent , cash and securities with an aggregate fair value of $ 82.62 billion and $ 71.87 billion as collateral for indemnified investments in repurchase agreements at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 , respectively . legal proceedings : in the ordinary course of business , we and our subsidiaries are involved in disputes , litigation and regulatory inquiries and investigations , both pending and threatened . these matters , if resolved adversely against us , may result in monetary damages , fines and penalties or require changes in our business practices . the resolution of these proceedings is inherently difficult to predict . however , we do not believe that the amount of any judgment , settlement or other action arising from any pending proceeding will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , although the outcome of certain of the matters described below may have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations for the period in which such matter is resolved .\nQuestion: how much was kept as collateral in 2009?\nAnswer: 375.92\nQuestion: how much was kept as collateral in 2008?\nAnswer: 333.07\nQuestion: what is the difference in value between 2008 and 2009?\nAnswer: 42.85\nQuestion: how much was kept as collateral in 2008?\nAnswer: 333.07\nQuestion: what is the difference divided by the collateral kept in 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.12865" } ]
CONVFINQA10194	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nchanges in our performance retention awards during 2009 were as follows : shares ( thous. ) weighted-average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares ( thous. )</td><td>weighted-averagegrant-date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at january 1 2009</td><td>873</td><td>$ 50.70</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>449</td><td>47.28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-240 ( 240 )</td><td>43.23</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-22 ( 22 )</td><td>53.86</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2009</td><td>1060</td><td>$ 50.88</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 22 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years . a portion of this expense is subject to achievement of the roic levels established for the performance stock unit grants . 5 . retirement plans pension and other postretirement benefits pension plans 2013 we provide defined benefit retirement income to eligible non-union employees through qualified and non-qualified ( supplemental ) pension plans . qualified and non-qualified pension benefits are based on years of service and the highest compensation during the latest years of employment , with specific reductions made for early retirements . other postretirement benefits ( opeb ) 2013 we provide defined contribution medical and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees . these benefits are funded as medical claims and life insurance premiums are plan amendment effective january 1 , 2010 , medicare-eligible retirees who are enrolled in the union pacific retiree medical program will receive a contribution to a health reimbursement account , which can be used to pay eligible out-of-pocket medical expenses . the impact of the plan amendment is reflected in the projected benefit obligation ( pbo ) at december 31 , 2009 . funded status we are required by gaap to separately recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our pension and opeb plans as an asset or liability . the funded status represents the difference between the pbo and the fair value of the plan assets . the pbo is the present value of benefits earned to date by plan participants , including the effect of assumed future salary increases . the pbo of the opeb plan is equal to the accumulated benefit obligation , as the present value of the opeb liabilities is not affected by salary increases . plan assets are measured at fair value . we use a december 31 measurement date for plan assets and obligations for all our retirement plans. .\nQuestion: what was the amount of nonvested shares as of 12/31/09?\nAnswer: 1060.0\nQuestion: now converted to millions?\nAnswer: 1060000.0\nQuestion: and considering the amount of shares forfeited, in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "22000000.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7273	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnew accounting pronouncements information regarding new accounting pronouncements is included in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements . financial condition and liquidity the company generates significant ongoing cash flow . increases in long-term debt have been used , in part , to fund share repurchase activities and acquisitions . on november 15 , 2007 , 3m ( safety , security and protection services business ) announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement for 3m 2019s acquisition of 100 percent of the outstanding shares of aearo holding corp . e83a a global leader in the personal protection industry that manufactures and markets personal protection and energy absorbing products e83a for approximately $ 1.2 billion . the sale is expected to close towards the end of the first quarter of 2008 . at december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 4920</td><td>$ 3553</td><td>$ 2381</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>2955</td><td>2084</td><td>1072</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net debt</td><td>$ 1965</td><td>$ 1469</td><td>$ 1309</td></tr></table> cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities at december 31 , 2007 totaled approximately $ 3 billion , helped by strong cash flow generation and by the timing of debt issuances . at december 31 , 2006 , cash balances were higher due to the significant pharmaceuticals sales proceeds received in december 2006 . 3m believes its ongoing cash flows provide ample cash to fund expected investments and capital expenditures . the company has sufficient access to capital markets to meet currently anticipated growth and acquisition investment funding needs . the company does not utilize derivative instruments linked to the company 2019s stock . however , the company does have contingently convertible debt that , if conditions for conversion are met , is convertible into shares of 3m common stock ( refer to note 10 in this document ) . the company 2019s financial condition and liquidity are strong . various assets and liabilities , including cash and short-term debt , can fluctuate significantly from month to month depending on short-term liquidity needs . working capital ( defined as current assets minus current liabilities ) totaled $ 4.476 billion at december 31 , 2007 , compared with $ 1.623 billion at december 31 , 2006 . working capital was higher primarily due to increases in cash and cash equivalents , short-term marketable securities , receivables and inventories and decreases in short-term debt and accrued income taxes . the company 2019s liquidity remains strong , with cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities at december 31 , 2007 totaling approximately $ 3 billion . primary short-term liquidity needs are provided through u.s . commercial paper and euro commercial paper issuances . as of december 31 , 2007 , outstanding total commercial paper issued totaled $ 349 million and averaged $ 1.249 billion during 2007 . the company believes it unlikely that its access to the commercial paper market will be restricted . in june 2007 , the company established a medium-term notes program through which up to $ 3 billion of medium-term notes may be offered , with remaining shelf borrowing capacity of $ 2.5 billion as of december 31 , 2007 . on april 30 , 2007 , the company replaced its $ 565-million credit facility with a new $ 1.5-billion five-year credit facility , which has provisions for the company to request an increase of the facility up to $ 2 billion ( at the lenders 2019 discretion ) , and providing for up to $ 150 million in letters of credit . as of december 31 , 2007 , there are $ 110 million in letters of credit drawn against the facility . at december 31 , 2007 , available short-term committed lines of credit internationally totaled approximately $ 67 million , of which $ 13 million was utilized . debt covenants do not restrict the payment of dividends . the company has a \"well-known seasoned issuer\" shelf registration statement , effective february 24 , 2006 , to register an indeterminate amount of debt or equity securities for future sales . the company intends to use the proceeds from future securities sales off this shelf for general corporate purposes . at december 31 , 2007 , certain debt agreements ( $ 350 million of dealer remarketable securities and $ 87 million of esop debt ) had ratings triggers ( bbb-/baa3 or lower ) that would require repayment of debt . the company has an aa credit rating , with a stable outlook , from standard & poor 2019s and an aa1 credit rating , with a negative outlook , from moody 2019s investors service . in addition , under the $ 1.5-billion five-year credit facility agreement , 3m is required to maintain its ebitda to interest ratio as of the end of each fiscal quarter at not less than 3.0 to 1 . this is calculated ( as defined in the agreement ) as the ratio of consolidated total ebitda for the four consecutive quarters then ended to total interest expense on all funded debt for the same period . at december 31 , 2007 , this ratio was approximately 35 to 1. .\nQuestion: in 2007, how much did the total debt represent in relation to the total of cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities?\nAnswer: 1.66497\nQuestion: and between that year and the previous, what was the variation in the working capital?\nAnswer: 2.853\nQuestion: what was that working capital in 2006?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.623" } ]
CONVFINQA9160	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 192 jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report consolidation analysis the multi-seller conduits administered by the firm were not consoli- dated at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , because each conduit had issued expected loss notes ( 201celns 201d ) , the holders of which are com- mitted to absorbing the majority of the expected loss of each respective conduit . implied support the firm did not have and continues not to have any intent to pro- tect any eln holders from potential losses on any of the conduits 2019 holdings and has no plans to remove any assets from any conduit unless required to do so in its role as administrator . should such a transfer occur , the firm would allocate losses on such assets between itself and the eln holders in accordance with the terms of the applicable eln . expected loss modeling in determining the primary beneficiary of the conduits the firm uses a monte carlo 2013based model to estimate the expected losses of each of the conduits and considers the relative rights and obliga- tions of each of the variable interest holders . the firm 2019s expected loss modeling treats all variable interests , other than the elns , as its own to determine consolidation . the variability to be considered in the modeling of expected losses is based on the design of the enti- ty . the firm 2019s traditional multi-seller conduits are designed to pass credit risk , not liquidity risk , to its variable interest holders , as the assets are intended to be held in the conduit for the longer term . under fin 46 ( r ) , the firm is required to run the monte carlo-based expected loss model each time a reconsideration event occurs . in applying this guidance to the conduits , the following events , are considered to be reconsideration events , as they could affect the determination of the primary beneficiary of the conduits : 2022 new deals , including the issuance of new or additional variable interests ( credit support , liquidity facilities , etc ) ; 2022 changes in usage , including the change in the level of outstand- ing variable interests ( credit support , liquidity facilities , etc ) ; 2022 modifications of asset purchase agreements ; and 2022 sales of interests held by the primary beneficiary . from an operational perspective , the firm does not run its monte carlo-based expected loss model every time there is a reconsideration event due to the frequency of their occurrence . instead , the firm runs its expected loss model each quarter and includes a growth assump- tion for each conduit to ensure that a sufficient amount of elns exists for each conduit at any point during the quarter . as part of its normal quarterly modeling , the firm updates , when applicable , the inputs and assumptions used in the expected loss model . specifically , risk ratings and loss given default assumptions are continually updated . the total amount of expected loss notes out- standing at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , were $ 136 million and $ 130 million , respectively . management has concluded that the model assumptions used were reflective of market participants 2019 assumptions and appropriately considered the probability of changes to risk ratings and loss given defaults . qualitative considerations the multi-seller conduits are primarily designed to provide an effi- cient means for clients to access the commercial paper market . the firm believes the conduits effectively disperse risk among all parties and that the preponderance of the economic risk in the firm 2019s multi- seller conduits is not held by jpmorgan chase . consolidated sensitivity analysis on capital the table below shows the impact on the firm 2019s reported assets , lia- bilities , tier 1 capital ratio and tier 1 leverage ratio if the firm were required to consolidate all of the multi-seller conduits that it admin- isters at their current carrying value . december 31 , 2008 ( in billions , except ratios ) reported pro forma ( a ) ( b ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in billions except ratios )</td><td>reported</td><td>pro forma ( a ) ( b )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>assets</td><td>$ 2175.1</td><td>$ 2218.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liabilities</td><td>2008.2</td><td>2051.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>tier 1 capital ratio</td><td>10.9% ( 10.9 % )</td><td>10.9% ( 10.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>tier 1 leverage ratio</td><td>6.9</td><td>6.8</td></tr></table> ( a ) the table shows the impact of consolidating the assets and liabilities of the multi- seller conduits at their current carrying value ; as such , there would be no income statement or capital impact at the date of consolidation . if the firm were required to consolidate the assets and liabilities of the conduits at fair value , the tier 1 capital ratio would be approximately 10.8% ( 10.8 % ) . the fair value of the assets is primarily based upon pricing for comparable transactions . the fair value of these assets could change significantly because the pricing of conduit transactions is renegotiated with the client , generally , on an annual basis and due to changes in current market conditions . ( b ) consolidation is assumed to occur on the first day of the quarter , at the quarter-end levels , in order to provide a meaningful adjustment to average assets in the denomi- nator of the leverage ratio . the firm could fund purchases of assets from vies should it become necessary . 2007 activity in july 2007 , a reverse repurchase agreement collateralized by prime residential mortgages held by a firm-administered multi-seller conduit was put to jpmorgan chase under its deal-specific liquidity facility . the asset was transferred to and recorded by jpmorgan chase at its par value based on the fair value of the collateral that supported the reverse repurchase agreement . during the fourth quarter of 2007 , additional information regarding the value of the collateral , including performance statistics , resulted in the determi- nation by the firm that the fair value of the collateral was impaired . impairment losses were allocated to the eln holder ( the party that absorbs the majority of the expected loss from the conduit ) in accor- dance with the contractual provisions of the eln note . on october 29 , 2007 , certain structured cdo assets originated in the second quarter of 2007 and backed by subprime mortgages were transferred to the firm from two firm-administered multi-seller conduits . it became clear in october that commercial paper investors and rating agencies were becoming increasingly concerned about cdo assets backed by subprime mortgage exposures . because of these concerns , and to ensure the continuing viability of the two conduits as financing vehicles for clients and as investment alternatives for commercial paper investors , the firm , in its role as administrator , transferred the cdo assets out of the multi-seller con- duits . the structured cdo assets were transferred to the firm at .\nQuestion: what is tier 1 capital ratio?\nAnswer: 10.9\nQuestion: and if the firm were required to consolidate the assets and liabilities of the conduits at fair value, how much does that tier 1 capital ratio would be?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "10.8" } ]
CONVFINQA3339	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements of annual compensation was made . for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and , 2007 , we made matching contributions of approxi- mately $ 450000 , $ 503000 and $ 457000 , respectively . note 17 / commitments and contingencies we and our operating partnership are not presently involved in any mate- rial litigation nor , to our knowledge , is any material litigation threatened against us or our properties , other than routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business . management believes the costs , if any , incurred by us and our operating partnership related to this litigation will not materially affect our financial position , operating results or liquidity . we have entered into employment agreements with certain executives , which expire between june 2010 and january 2013 . the minimum cash-based compensation , including base salary and guaran- teed bonus payments , associated with these employment agreements totals approximately $ 7.8 million for 2010 . in march 1998 , we acquired an operating sub-leasehold posi- tion at 420 lexington avenue . the operating sub-leasehold position required annual ground lease payments totaling $ 6.0 million and sub- leasehold position payments totaling $ 1.1 million ( excluding an operating sub-lease position purchased january 1999 ) . in june 2007 , we renewed and extended the maturity date of the ground lease at 420 lexington avenue through december 31 , 2029 , with an option for further exten- sion through 2080 . ground lease rent payments through 2029 will total approximately $ 10.9 million per year . thereafter , the ground lease will be subject to a revaluation by the parties thereto . in june 2009 , we acquired an operating sub-leasehold posi- tion at 420 lexington avenue for approximately $ 7.7 million . these sub-leasehold positions were scheduled to mature in december 2029 . in october 2009 , we acquired the remaining sub-leasehold position for $ 7.6 million . the property located at 711 third avenue operates under an operating sub-lease , which expires in 2083 . under the sub-lease , we are responsible for ground rent payments of $ 1.55 million annually through july 2011 on the 50% ( 50 % ) portion of the fee we do not own . the ground rent is reset after july 2011 based on the estimated fair market value of the property . we have an option to buy out the sub-lease at a fixed future date . the property located at 461 fifth avenue operates under a ground lease ( approximately $ 2.1 million annually ) with a term expiration date of 2027 and with two options to renew for an additional 21 years each , followed by a third option for 15 years . we also have an option to purchase the ground lease for a fixed price on a specific date . the property located at 625 madison avenue operates under a ground lease ( approximately $ 4.6 million annually ) with a term expiration date of 2022 and with two options to renew for an additional 23 years . the property located at 1185 avenue of the americas oper- ates under a ground lease ( approximately $ 8.5 million in 2010 and $ 6.9 million annually thereafter ) with a term expiration of 2020 and with an option to renew for an additional 23 years . in april 1988 , the sl green predecessor entered into a lease agreement for the property at 673 first avenue , which has been capitalized for financial statement purposes . land was estimated to be approximately 70% ( 70 % ) of the fair market value of the property . the portion of the lease attributed to land is classified as an operating lease and the remainder as a capital lease . the initial lease term is 49 years with an option for an additional 26 years . beginning in lease years 11 and 25 , the lessor is entitled to additional rent as defined by the lease agreement . we continue to lease the 673 first avenue property , which has been classified as a capital lease with a cost basis of $ 12.2 million and cumulative amortization of $ 5.5 million and $ 5.2 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments under capital leases and noncancellable operating leases with initial terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2009 ( in thousands ) : non-cancellable december 31 , capital lease operating leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31,</td><td>capital lease</td><td>non-cancellable operating leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 1451</td><td>$ 31347</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>1555</td><td>28929</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>1555</td><td>28179</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>1555</td><td>28179</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>1555</td><td>28179</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>45649</td><td>580600</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>53320</td><td>$ 725413</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>less amount representing interest</td><td>-36437 ( 36437 )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of net minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 16883</td><td>-</td></tr></table> note 18 / financial instruments : derivatives and hedging we recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value . derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income . if a derivative is a hedge , depending on the nature of the hedge , changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset , liability , or firm commitment through earn- ings , or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings . the ineffective portion of a derivative 2019s change in fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings . reported net income and stockholders 2019 equity may increase or decrease prospectively , depending on future levels of interest rates and other variables affecting the fair values of derivative instruments and hedged items , but will have no effect on cash flows. .\nQuestion: what is the sum of capital and non-cancellable operating leases in 2012?\nAnswer: 29734.0\nQuestion: what were the number of capital leases?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1555.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7347	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company expects to amortize $ 1.7 million of actuarial loss from accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) into net periodic benefit costs in 2011 . at december 31 , 2010 , anticipated benefit payments from the plan in future years are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>year</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 7.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012</td><td>8.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>8.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>9.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2015</td><td>10.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2016-2020</td><td>62.8</td></tr></table> savings plans . cme maintains a defined contribution savings plan pursuant to section 401 ( k ) of the internal revenue code , whereby all u.s . employees are participants and have the option to contribute to this plan . cme matches employee contributions up to 3% ( 3 % ) of the employee 2019s base salary and may make additional discretionary contributions of up to 2% ( 2 % ) of base salary . in addition , certain cme london-based employees are eligible to participate in a defined contribution plan . for cme london-based employees , the plan provides for company contributions of 10% ( 10 % ) of earnings and does not have any vesting requirements . salary and cash bonuses paid are included in the definition of earnings . aggregate expense for all of the defined contribution savings plans amounted to $ 6.3 million , $ 5.2 million and $ 5.8 million in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . cme non-qualified plans . cme maintains non-qualified plans , under which participants may make assumed investment choices with respect to amounts contributed on their behalf . although not required to do so , cme invests such contributions in assets that mirror the assumed investment choices . the balances in these plans are subject to the claims of general creditors of the exchange and totaled $ 28.8 million and $ 23.4 million at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . although the value of the plans is recorded as an asset in the consolidated balance sheets , there is an equal and offsetting liability . the investment results of these plans have no impact on net income as the investment results are recorded in equal amounts to both investment income and compensation and benefits expense . supplemental savings plan 2014cme maintains a supplemental plan to provide benefits for employees who have been impacted by statutory limits under the provisions of the qualified pension and savings plan . all cme employees hired prior to january 1 , 2007 are immediately vested in their supplemental plan benefits . all cme employees hired on or after january 1 , 2007 are subject to the vesting requirements of the underlying qualified plans . total expense for the supplemental plan was $ 0.9 million , $ 0.7 million and $ 1.3 million for 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . deferred compensation plan 2014a deferred compensation plan is maintained by cme , under which eligible officers and members of the board of directors may contribute a percentage of their compensation and defer income taxes thereon until the time of distribution . nymexmembers 2019 retirement plan and benefits . nymex maintained a retirement and benefit plan under the commodities exchange , inc . ( comex ) members 2019 recognition and retention plan ( mrrp ) . this plan provides benefits to certain members of the comex division based on long-term membership , and participation is limited to individuals who were comex division members prior to nymex 2019s acquisition of comex in 1994 . no new participants were permitted into the plan after the date of this acquisition . under the terms of the mrrp , the company is required to fund the plan with a minimum annual contribution of $ 0.4 million until it is fully funded . all benefits to be paid under the mrrp are based on reasonable actuarial assumptions which are based upon the amounts that are available and are expected to be available to pay benefits . total contributions to the plan were $ 0.8 million for each of 2010 , 2009 and for the period august 23 through december 31 , 2008 . at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the total obligation for the mrrp totaled $ 20.7 million and $ 20.5 million .\nQuestion: what was the expense for the supplemental plan in 2010?\nAnswer: 0.9\nQuestion: what was the expense for the supplemental plan in 2009?\nAnswer: 0.7\nQuestion: what is the sum of those values?\nAnswer: 1.6\nQuestion: what is the sum including 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2.9" } ]
CONVFINQA1781	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nliquidity and capital resources as of december 31 , 2006 , our principal sources of liquidity included cash , cash equivalents , the sale of receivables , and our revolving credit facilities , as well as the availability of commercial paper and other sources of financing through the capital markets . we had $ 2 billion of committed credit facilities available , of which there were no borrowings outstanding as of december 31 , 2006 , and we did not make any short-term borrowings under these facilities during the year . the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the sale of receivables program was $ 600 million as of december 31 , 2006 . the sale of receivables program is subject to certain requirements , including the maintenance of an investment grade bond rating . if our bond rating were to deteriorate , it could have an adverse impact on our liquidity . access to commercial paper is dependent on market conditions . deterioration of our operating results or financial condition due to internal or external factors could negatively impact our ability to utilize commercial paper as a source of liquidity . liquidity through the capital markets is also dependent on our financial stability . at both december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had a working capital deficit of approximately $ 1.1 billion . a working capital deficit is common in our industry and does not indicate a lack of liquidity . we maintain adequate resources to meet our daily cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . financial condition cash flows millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flowsmillions of dollars</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2880</td><td>$ 2595</td><td>$ 2257</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>-2042 ( 2042 )</td><td>-2047 ( 2047 )</td><td>-1732 ( 1732 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash used in financing activities</td><td>-784 ( 784 )</td><td>-752 ( 752 )</td><td>-75 ( 75 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net change in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 54</td><td>$ -204 ( 204 )</td><td>$ 450</td></tr></table> cash provided by operating activities 2013 higher income in 2006 generated the increased cash provided by operating activities , which was partially offset by higher income tax payments , $ 150 million in voluntary pension contributions , higher material and supply inventories , and higher management incentive payments in 2006 . higher income , lower management incentive payments in 2005 ( executive bonuses , which would have been paid to individuals in 2005 , were not awarded based on company performance in 2004 and bonuses for the professional workforce that were paid out in 2005 were significantly reduced ) , and working capital performance generated higher cash from operating activities in 2005 . a voluntary pension contribution of $ 100 million in 2004 also augmented the positive year-over-year variance in 2005 as no pension contribution was made in 2005 . this improvement was partially offset by cash received in 2004 for income tax refunds . cash used in investing activities 2013 an insurance settlement for the 2005 january west coast storm and lower balances for work in process decreased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2006 . higher capital investments and lower proceeds from asset sales partially offset this decrease . increased capital spending , partially offset by higher proceeds from asset sales , increased the amount of cash used in investing activities in 2005 compared to 2004 . cash used in financing activities 2013 the increase in cash used in financing activities primarily resulted from lower net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 189 million in 2006 compared to $ 262 million in 2005 ) . the increase in 2005 results from debt issuances in 2004 and higher debt repayments in 2005 . we did not issue debt in 2005 versus $ 745 million of debt issuances in 2004 , and we repaid $ 699 million of debt in 2005 compared to $ 588 million in 2004 . the higher outflows in 2005 were partially offset by higher net proceeds from equity compensation plans ( $ 262 million in 2005 compared to $ 80 million in 2004 ) . .\nQuestion: what was the amount of cash provided by operating activities in 2006?\nAnswer: 2880.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2005?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2595.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7402	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income taxes in the period such resolution occurs . liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics as of and for the years ended september 28 , 2013 , september 29 , 2012 and september 24 , 2011 ( in millions ) : the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital asset purchases , outstanding commitments , and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months . the company anticipates the cash used for future dividends and the share repurchase program will come from its current domestic cash , cash generated from on-going u.s . operating activities and from borrowings . as of september 28 , 2013 and september 29 , 2012 , $ 111.3 billion and $ 82.6 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s . dollar-denominated holdings . amounts held by foreign subsidiaries are generally subject to u.s . income taxation on repatriation to the u.s . the company 2019s marketable securities investment portfolio is invested primarily in highly-rated securities and its investment policy generally limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer . the policy requires investments generally to be investment grade with the objective of minimizing the potential risk of principal loss . during 2013 , cash generated from operating activities of $ 53.7 billion was a result of $ 37.0 billion of net income , non-cash adjustments to net income of $ 10.2 billion and an increase in net change in operating assets and liabilities of $ 6.5 billion . cash used in investing activities of $ 33.8 billion during 2013 consisted primarily of net purchases , sales and maturities of marketable securities of $ 24.0 billion and cash used to acquire property , plant and equipment of $ 8.2 billion . cash used in financing activities during 2013 consisted primarily of cash used to repurchase common stock of $ 22.9 billion and cash used to pay dividends and dividend equivalent rights of $ 10.6 billion , partially offset by net proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt of $ 16.9 billion . during 2012 , cash generated from operating activities of $ 50.9 billion was a result of $ 41.7 billion of net income and non-cash adjustments to net income of $ 9.4 billion , partially offset by a decrease in net operating assets and liabilities of $ 299 million . cash used in investing activities during 2012 of $ 48.2 billion consisted primarily of net purchases , sales and maturities of marketable securities of $ 38.4 billion and cash used to acquire property , plant and equipment of $ 8.3 billion . cash used in financing activities during 2012 of $ 1.7 billion consisted primarily of cash used to pay dividends and dividend equivalent rights of $ 2.5 billion . capital assets the company 2019s capital expenditures were $ 7.0 billion during 2013 , consisting of $ 499 million for retail store facilities and $ 6.5 billion for other capital expenditures , including product tooling and manufacturing process equipment , and other corporate facilities and infrastructure . the company 2019s actual cash payments for capital expenditures during 2013 were $ 8.2 billion. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 146761</td><td>$ 121251</td><td>$ 81570</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>property plant and equipment net</td><td>$ 16597</td><td>$ 15452</td><td>$ 7777</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>$ 16960</td><td>$ 0</td><td>$ 0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>working capital</td><td>$ 29628</td><td>$ 19111</td><td>$ 17018</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>cash generated by operating activities</td><td>$ 53666</td><td>$ 50856</td><td>$ 37529</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>cash used in investing activities</td><td>$ -33774 ( 33774 )</td><td>$ -48227 ( 48227 )</td><td>$ -40419 ( 40419 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>cash generated/ ( used in ) by financing activities</td><td>$ -16379 ( 16379 )</td><td>$ -1698 ( 1698 )</td><td>$ 1444</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the total long-term debt of 2013 and 2012?\nAnswer: 16960.0\nQuestion: then what is the total long-term debt if we also include the year 2011?\nAnswer: 16960.0\nQuestion: what is the average of these 3 years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "5653.33333" } ]
CONVFINQA7243	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nzimmer biomet holdings , inc . and subsidiaries 2018 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) default for unsecured financing arrangements , including , among other things , limitations on consolidations , mergers and sales of assets . financial covenants under the 2018 , 2016 and 2014 credit agreements include a consolidated indebtedness to consolidated ebitda ratio of no greater than 5.0 to 1.0 through june 30 , 2017 , and no greater than 4.5 to 1.0 thereafter . if our credit rating falls below investment grade , additional restrictions would result , including restrictions on investments and payment of dividends . we were in compliance with all covenants under the 2018 , 2016 and 2014 credit agreements as of december 31 , 2018 . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were no borrowings outstanding under the multicurrency revolving facility . we may , at our option , redeem our senior notes , in whole or in part , at any time upon payment of the principal , any applicable make-whole premium , and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption , except that the floating rate notes due 2021 may not be redeemed until on or after march 20 , 2019 and such notes do not have any applicable make-whole premium . in addition , we may redeem , at our option , the 2.700% ( 2.700 % ) senior notes due 2020 , the 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) senior notes due 2021 , the 3.150% ( 3.150 % ) senior notes due 2022 , the 3.700% ( 3.700 % ) senior notes due 2023 , the 3.550% ( 3.550 % ) senior notes due 2025 , the 4.250% ( 4.250 % ) senior notes due 2035 and the 4.450% ( 4.450 % ) senior notes due 2045 without any make-whole premium at specified dates ranging from one month to six months in advance of the scheduled maturity date . the estimated fair value of our senior notes as of december 31 , 2018 , based on quoted prices for the specific securities from transactions in over-the-counter markets ( level 2 ) , was $ 7798.9 million . the estimated fair value of japan term loan a and japan term loan b , in the aggregate , as of december 31 , 2018 , based upon publicly available market yield curves and the terms of the debt ( level 2 ) , was $ 294.7 million . the carrying values of u.s . term loan b and u.s . term loan c approximate fair value as they bear interest at short-term variable market rates . we entered into interest rate swap agreements which we designated as fair value hedges of underlying fixed-rate obligations on our senior notes due 2019 and 2021 . these fair value hedges were settled in 2016 . in 2016 , we entered into various variable-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements that were accounted for as cash flow hedges of u.s . term loan b . in 2018 , we entered into cross-currency interest rate swaps that we designated as net investment hedges . the excluded component of these net investment hedges is recorded in interest expense , net . see note 13 for additional information regarding our interest rate swap agreements . we also have available uncommitted credit facilities totaling $ 55.0 million . at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the weighted average interest rate for our borrowings was 3.1 percent and 2.9 percent , respectively . we paid $ 282.8 million , $ 317.5 million , and $ 363.1 million in interest during 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . 12 . accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income aoci refers to certain gains and losses that under gaap are included in comprehensive income but are excluded from net earnings as these amounts are initially recorded as an adjustment to stockholders 2019 equity . amounts in aoci may be reclassified to net earnings upon the occurrence of certain events . our aoci is comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments , including unrealized gains and losses on net investment hedges , unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges , and amortization of prior service costs and unrecognized gains and losses in actuarial assumptions on our defined benefit plans . foreign currency translation adjustments are reclassified to net earnings upon sale or upon a complete or substantially complete liquidation of an investment in a foreign entity . unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges are reclassified to net earnings when the hedged item affects net earnings . amounts related to defined benefit plans that are in aoci are reclassified over the service periods of employees in the plan . see note 14 for more information on our defined benefit plans . the following table shows the changes in the components of aoci , net of tax ( in millions ) : foreign currency translation hedges defined benefit plan items . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>cash flow hedges</td><td>defined benefit plan items</td><td>total aoci</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance december 31 2017</td><td>$ 121.5</td><td>$ -66.5 ( 66.5 )</td><td>$ -138.2 ( 138.2 )</td><td>$ -83.2 ( 83.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aoci before reclassifications</td><td>-135.4 ( 135.4 )</td><td>68.2</td><td>-29.7 ( 29.7 )</td><td>-96.9 ( 96.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reclassifications to retained earnings ( note 2 )</td><td>-17.4 ( 17.4 )</td><td>-4.4 ( 4.4 )</td><td>-21.1 ( 21.1 )</td><td>-42.9 ( 42.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reclassifications</td><td>-</td><td>23.6</td><td>12.0</td><td>35.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance december 31 2018</td><td>$ -31.3 ( 31.3 )</td><td>$ 20.9</td><td>$ -177.0 ( 177.0 )</td><td>$ -187.4 ( 187.4 )</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the positive balance of the foreign currency translation at the end of 2018?\nAnswer: -31.3\nQuestion: what was the value at the end of 2017?\nAnswer: 121.5\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-152.8" } ]
CONVFINQA5924	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhollyfrontier corporation notes to consolidated financial statements continued . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 148716</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>132547</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>119639</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>107400</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022</td><td>102884</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>857454</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 1468640</td></tr></table> transportation and storage costs incurred under these agreements totaled $ 140.5 million , $ 135.1 million and $ 137.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . these amounts do not include contractual commitments under our long-term transportation agreements with hep , as all transactions with hep are eliminated in these consolidated financial statements . we have a crude oil supply contract that requires the supplier to deliver a specified volume of crude oil or pay a shortfall fee for the difference in the actual barrels delivered to us less the specified barrels per the supply contract . for the contract year ended august 31 , 2017 , the actual number of barrels delivered to us was substantially less than the specified barrels , and we recorded a reduction to cost of goods sold and accumulated a shortfall fee receivable of $ 26.0 million during this period . in september 2017 , the supplier notified us they are disputing the shortfall fee owed and in october 2017 notified us of their demand for arbitration . we offset the receivable with payments of invoices for deliveries of crude oil received subsequent to august 31 , 2017 , which is permitted under the supply contract . we believe the disputes and claims made by the supplier are without merit . in march , 2006 , a subsidiary of ours sold the assets of montana refining company under an asset purchase agreement ( 201capa 201d ) . calumet montana refining llc , the current owner of the assets , has submitted requests for reimbursement of approximately $ 20.0 million pursuant to contractual indemnity provisions under the apa for various costs incurred , as well as additional claims related to environmental matters . we have rejected most of the claims for payment , and this matter is scheduled for arbitration beginning in july 2018 . we have accrued the costs we believe are owed pursuant to the apa , and we estimate that any reasonably possible losses beyond the amounts accrued are not material . note 20 : segment information effective fourth quarter of 2017 , we revised our reportable segments to align with certain changes in how our chief operating decision maker manages and allocates resources to our business . accordingly , our tulsa refineries 2019 lubricants operations , previously reported in the refining segment , are now combined with the operations of our petro-canada lubricants business ( acquired february 1 , 2017 ) and reported in the lubricants and specialty products segment . our prior period segment information has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect our current segment presentation . our operations are organized into three reportable segments , refining , lubricants and specialty products and hep . our operations that are not included in the refining , lubricants and specialty products and hep segments are included in corporate and other . intersegment transactions are eliminated in our consolidated financial statements and are included in eliminations . corporate and other and eliminations are aggregated and presented under corporate , other and eliminations column . the refining segment represents the operations of the el dorado , tulsa , navajo , cheyenne and woods cross refineries and hfc asphalt ( aggregated as a reportable segment ) . refining activities involve the purchase and refining of crude oil and wholesale and branded marketing of refined products , such as gasoline , diesel fuel and jet fuel . these petroleum products are primarily marketed in the mid-continent , southwest and rocky mountain regions of the united states . hfc asphalt operates various asphalt terminals in arizona , new mexico and oklahoma. .\nQuestion: what is the sum of the transportation and storage costs incurred under these agreements for the years of 2016 and 2017?\nAnswer: 275.6\nQuestion: what was the transportation and storage costs incurred under these agreements in 2015?\nAnswer: 137.7\nQuestion: what is the sum of these 3 years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "413.3" } ]
CONVFINQA8521	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nitem 4 . submission of matters to a vote of security holders no matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2005 . part ii item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities market information our series a common stock has traded on the new york stock exchange under the symbol 2018 2018ce 2019 2019 since january 21 , 2005 . the closing sale price of our series a common stock , as reported by the new york stock exchange , on march 6 , 2006 was $ 20.98 . the following table sets forth the high and low intraday sales prices per share of our common stock , as reported by the new york stock exchange , for the periods indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2005</td><td>pricerange high</td><td>pricerange low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarterended march 312005</td><td>$ 18.65</td><td>$ 15.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter endedjune 302005</td><td>$ 18.16</td><td>$ 13.54</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter endedseptember 30 2005</td><td>$ 20.06</td><td>$ 15.88</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter endeddecember 312005</td><td>$ 19.76</td><td>$ 15.58</td></tr></table> holders no shares of celanese 2019s series b common stock are issued and outstanding . as of march 6 , 2006 , there were 51 holders of record of our series a common stock , and one holder of record of our perpetual preferred stock . by including persons holding shares in broker accounts under street names , however , we estimate our shareholder base to be approximately 6800 as of march 6 , 2006 . dividend policy in july 2005 , our board of directors adopted a policy of declaring , subject to legally available funds , a quarterly cash dividend on each share of our common stock at an annual rate initially equal to approximately 1% ( 1 % ) of the $ 16 price per share in the initial public offering of our series a common stock ( or $ 0.16 per share ) unless our board of directors , in its sole discretion , determines otherwise , commencing the second quarter of 2005 . pursuant to this policy , the company paid the quarterly dividends of $ 0.04 per share on august 11 , 2005 , november 1 , 2005 and february 1 , 2006 . based on the number of outstanding shares of our series a common stock , the anticipated annual cash dividend is approximately $ 25 million . however , there is no assurance that sufficient cash will be available in the future to pay such dividend . further , such dividends payable to holders of our series a common stock cannot be declared or paid nor can any funds be set aside for the payment thereof , unless we have paid or set aside funds for the payment of all accumulated and unpaid dividends with respect to the shares of our preferred stock , as described below . our board of directors may , at any time , modify or revoke our dividend policy on our series a common stock . we are required under the terms of the preferred stock to pay scheduled quarterly dividends , subject to legally available funds . for so long as the preferred stock remains outstanding , ( 1 ) we will not declare , pay or set apart funds for the payment of any dividend or other distribution with respect to any junior stock or parity stock and ( 2 ) neither we , nor any of our subsidiaries , will , subject to certain exceptions , redeem , purchase or otherwise acquire for consideration junior stock or parity stock through a sinking fund or otherwise , in each case unless we have paid or set apart funds for the payment of all accumulated and unpaid dividends with respect to the shares of preferred stock and any parity stock for all preceding dividend periods . pursuant to this policy , the company paid the quarterly dividends of $ 0.265625 on its 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) convertible perpetual preferred stock on august 1 , 2005 , november 1 , 2005 and february 1 , 2006 . the anticipated annual cash dividend is approximately $ 10 million. .\nQuestion: what is the average dividend per quarter based on the anticipated annual cash dividend, in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "6.25" } ]
CONVFINQA2147	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnet unfunded credit commitments . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 - in millions</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>commercial</td><td>$ 39171</td><td>$ 31009</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>consumer</td><td>10875</td><td>10495</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>commercial real estate</td><td>2734</td><td>2752</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>567</td><td>579</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 53347</td><td>$ 44835</td></tr></table> commitments to extend credit represent arrangements to lend funds subject to specified contractual conditions . at december 31 , 2007 , commercial commitments are reported net of $ 8.9 billion of participations , assignments and syndications , primarily to financial services companies . the comparable amount at december 31 , 2006 was $ 8.3 billion . commitments generally have fixed expiration dates , may require payment of a fee , and contain termination clauses in the event the customer 2019s credit quality deteriorates . based on our historical experience , most commitments expire unfunded , and therefore cash requirements are substantially less than the total commitment . consumer home equity lines of credit accounted for 80% ( 80 % ) of consumer unfunded credit commitments . unfunded credit commitments related to market street totaled $ 8.8 billion at december 31 , 2007 and $ 5.6 billion at december 31 , 2006 and are included in the preceding table primarily within the 201ccommercial 201d and 201cconsumer 201d categories . note 24 commitments and guarantees includes information regarding standby letters of credit and bankers 2019 acceptances . at december 31 , 2007 , the largest industry concentration was for general medical and surgical hospitals , which accounted for approximately 5% ( 5 % ) of the total letters of credit and bankers 2019 acceptances . at december 31 , 2007 , we pledged $ 1.6 billion of loans to the federal reserve bank ( 201cfrb 201d ) and $ 33.5 billion of loans to the federal home loan bank ( 201cfhlb 201d ) as collateral for the contingent ability to borrow , if necessary . certain directors and executive officers of pnc and its subsidiaries , as well as certain affiliated companies of these directors and officers , were customers of and had loans with subsidiary banks in the ordinary course of business . all such loans were on substantially the same terms , including interest rates and collateral , as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other customers and did not involve more than a normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features . the aggregate principal amounts of these loans were $ 13 million at december 31 , 2007 and $ 18 million at december 31 , 2006 . during 2007 , new loans of $ 48 million were funded and repayments totaled $ 53 million. .\nQuestion: what was the total of commercial commitments net of participations , assignments and syndications , primarily to financial services companies in 2007, in billions?\nAnswer: 8.9\nQuestion: and what was it in 2006, also in billions?\nAnswer: 8.3\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\nAnswer: 0.6\nQuestion: and in the last year of that period, what percentage of the consumer unfunded credit commitments did the consumer home equity lines of credit account for?\nAnswer: 0.8\nQuestion: and what were those consumer unfunded credit commitments?\nAnswer: 10875.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the value of the consumer home equity lines of credit?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "8700.0" } ]
CONVFINQA683	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n24 \| 2018 emerson annual report 2017 vs . 2016 2013 commercial & residential solutions sales were $ 5.9 billion in 2017 , an increase of $ 302 million , or 5 percent , reflecting favorable conditions in hvac and refrigeration markets in the u.s. , asia and europe , as well as u.s . and asian construction markets . underlying sales increased 5 percent ( $ 297 million ) on 6 percent higher volume , partially offset by 1 percent lower price . foreign currency translation deducted $ 20 million and acquisitions added $ 25 million . climate technologies sales were $ 4.2 billion in 2017 , an increase of $ 268 million , or 7 percent . global air conditioning sales were solid , led by strength in the u.s . and asia and robust growth in china partially due to easier comparisons , while sales were up modestly in europe and declined moderately in middle east/africa . global refrigeration sales were strong , reflecting robust growth in china on increased adoption of energy- efficient solutions and slight growth in the u.s . sensors and solutions had strong growth , while temperature controls was up modestly . tools & home products sales were $ 1.6 billion in 2017 , up $ 34 million compared to the prior year . professional tools had strong growth on favorable demand from oil and gas customers and in other construction-related markets . wet/dry vacuums sales were up moderately as favorable conditions continued in u.s . construction markets . food waste disposers increased slightly , while the storage business declined moderately . overall , underlying sales increased 3 percent in the u.s. , 4 percent in europe and 17 percent in asia ( china up 27 percent ) . sales increased 3 percent in latin america and 4 percent in canada , while sales decreased 5 percent in middle east/africa . earnings were $ 1.4 billion , an increase of $ 72 million driven by climate technologies , while margin was flat . increased volume and resulting leverage , savings from cost reduction actions , and lower customer accommodation costs of $ 16 million were largely offset by higher materials costs , lower price and unfavorable product mix . financial position , capital resources and liquidity the company continues to generate substantial cash from operations and has the resources available to reinvest for growth in existing businesses , pursue strategic acquisitions and manage its capital structure on a short- and long-term basis . cash flow from continuing operations ( dollars in millions ) 2016 2017 2018 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating cash flow</td><td>$ 2499</td><td>2690</td><td>2892</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>percent of sales</td><td>17.2% ( 17.2 % )</td><td>17.6% ( 17.6 % )</td><td>16.6% ( 16.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capital expenditures</td><td>$ 447</td><td>476</td><td>617</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>percent of sales</td><td>3.1% ( 3.1 % )</td><td>3.1% ( 3.1 % )</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>free cash flow ( operating cash flow less capital expenditures )</td><td>$ 2052</td><td>2214</td><td>2275</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>percent of sales</td><td>14.1% ( 14.1 % )</td><td>14.5% ( 14.5 % )</td><td>13.1% ( 13.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>operating working capital</td><td>$ 755</td><td>1007</td><td>985</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>percent of sales</td><td>5.2% ( 5.2 % )</td><td>6.6% ( 6.6 % )</td><td>5.7% ( 5.7 % )</td></tr></table> operating cash flow from continuing operations for 2018 was $ 2.9 billion , a $ 202 million , or 8 percent increase compared with 2017 , primarily due to higher earnings , partially offset by an increase in working capital investment to support higher levels of sales activity and income taxes paid on the residential storage divestiture . operating cash flow from continuing operations of $ 2.7 billion in 2017 increased 8 percent compared to $ 2.5 billion in 2016 , reflecting higher earnings and favorable changes in working capital . at september 30 , 2018 , operating working capital as a percent of sales was 5.7 percent compared with 6.6 percent in 2017 and 5.2 percent in 2016 . the increase in 2017 was due to higher levels of working capital in the acquired valves & controls business . operating cash flow from continuing operations funded capital expenditures of $ 617 million , dividends of $ 1.2 billion , and common stock purchases of $ 1.0 billion . in 2018 , the company repatriated $ 1.4 billion of cash held by non-u.s . subsidiaries , which was part of the company 2019s previously announced plans . these funds along with increased short-term borrowings and divestiture proceeds supported acquisitions of $ 2.2 billion . contributions to pension plans were $ 61 million in 2018 , $ 45 million in 2017 and $ 66 million in 2016 . capital expenditures related to continuing operations were $ 617 million , $ 476 million and $ 447 million in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . free cash flow from continuing operations ( operating cash flow less capital expenditures ) was $ 2.3 billion in 2018 , up 3 percent . free cash flow was $ 2.2 billion in 2017 , compared with $ 2.1 billion in 2016 . the company is targeting capital spending of approximately $ 650 million in 2019 . net cash paid in connection with acquisitions was $ 2.2 billion , $ 3.0 billion and $ 132 million in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . proceeds from divestitures not classified as discontinued operations were $ 201 million and $ 39 million in 2018 and 2017 , respectively . dividends were $ 1.2 billion ( $ 1.94 per share ) in 2018 , compared with $ 1.2 billion ( $ 1.92 per share ) in 2017 and $ 1.2 billion ( $ 1.90 per share ) in 2016 . in november 2018 , the board of directors voted to increase the quarterly cash dividend 1 percent , to an annualized rate of $ 1.96 per share . purchases of emerson common stock totaled $ 1.0 billion , $ 400 million and $ 601 million in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively , at average per share prices of $ 66.25 , $ 60.51 and $ 48.11 . the board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 70 million common shares in november 2015 , and 41.8 million shares remain available for purchase under this authorization . the company purchased 15.1 million shares in 2018 , 6.6 million shares in 2017 , and 12.5 million shares in 2016 under this authorization and the remainder of the may 2013 authorization. .\nQuestion: what was the value of capital expenditures in 2018?\nAnswer: 617.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "476.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5517	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncertain mortgage loans citigroup has elected the fair value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for-sale . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>december 31 2009</td><td>december 31 2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet</td><td>$ 3338</td><td>$ 4273</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principalbalance</td><td>55</td><td>138</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>4</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrualloans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>3</td><td>2</td></tr></table> the changes in fair values of these mortgage loans are reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . the changes in fair value during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 due to instrument-specific credit risk resulted in a $ 10 million loss and $ 32 million loss , respectively . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated statement of income . mortgage servicing rights the company accounts for mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value . fair value for msrs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach . this approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates . the model assumptions used in the valuation of msrs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates . the fair value of msrs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates . in managing this risk , the company hedges a significant portion of the values of its msrs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts , forward-purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities , and purchased securities classified as trading . see note 23 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of msrs . these msrs , which totaled $ 6.5 billion and $ 5.7 billion as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , are classified as mortgage servicing rights on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of msrs are recorded in commissions and fees in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . certain structured liabilities the company has elected the fair value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates , inflation or currency risks ( 201cstructured liabilities 201d ) . the company elected the fair value option , because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair value basis . these positions will continue to be classified as debt , deposits or derivatives ( trading account liabilities ) on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form . for those structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value by $ 125 million and $ 671 million as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain non-structured liabilities the company has elected the fair value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ( 201cnon-structured liabilities 201d ) . the company has elected the fair value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings . the election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications . these positions are reported in short-term borrowings and long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . for those non-structured liabilities classified as short-term borrowings for which the fair value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 220 million as of december 31 , 2008 . for non-structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value by $ 1542 million and $ 856 million as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the fair value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment , as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans carried at fair value: .\nQuestion: what was the aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance for the loans accounted for with the fair value option in 2009?\nAnswer: 55.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "138.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3686	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nconsolidated income statement review our consolidated income statement is presented in item 8 of this report . net income for 2012 was $ 3.0 billion compared with $ 3.1 billion for 2011 . revenue growth of 8 percent and a decline in the provision for credit losses were more than offset by a 16 percent increase in noninterest expense in 2012 compared to 2011 . further detail is included in the net interest income , noninterest income , provision for credit losses and noninterest expense portions of this consolidated income statement review . net interest income table 2 : net interest income and net interest margin year ended december 31 dollars in millions 2012 2011 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31dollars in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest income</td><td>$ 9640</td><td>$ 8700</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net interest margin</td><td>3.94% ( 3.94 % )</td><td>3.92% ( 3.92 % )</td></tr></table> changes in net interest income and margin result from the interaction of the volume and composition of interest-earning assets and related yields , interest-bearing liabilities and related rates paid , and noninterest-bearing sources of funding . see the statistical information ( unaudited ) 2013 average consolidated balance sheet and net interest analysis and analysis of year-to-year changes in net interest income in item 8 of this report and the discussion of purchase accounting accretion of purchased impaired loans in the consolidated balance sheet review in this item 7 for additional information . the increase in net interest income in 2012 compared with 2011 was primarily due to the impact of the rbc bank ( usa ) acquisition , organic loan growth and lower funding costs . purchase accounting accretion remained stable at $ 1.1 billion in both periods . the net interest margin was 3.94% ( 3.94 % ) for 2012 and 3.92% ( 3.92 % ) for 2011 . the increase in the comparison was primarily due to a decrease in the weighted-average rate accrued on total interest- bearing liabilities of 29 basis points , largely offset by a 21 basis point decrease on the yield on total interest-earning assets . the decrease in the rate on interest-bearing liabilities was primarily due to the runoff of maturing retail certificates of deposit and the redemption of additional trust preferred and hybrid capital securities during 2012 , in addition to an increase in fhlb borrowings and commercial paper as lower-cost funding sources . the decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets was primarily due to lower rates on new loan volume and lower yields on new securities in the current low rate environment . with respect to the first quarter of 2013 , we expect net interest income to decline by two to three percent compared to fourth quarter 2012 net interest income of $ 2.4 billion , due to a decrease in purchase accounting accretion of up to $ 50 to $ 60 million , including lower expected cash recoveries . for the full year 2013 , we expect net interest income to decrease compared with 2012 , assuming an expected decline in purchase accounting accretion of approximately $ 400 million , while core net interest income is expected to increase in the year-over-year comparison . we believe our net interest margin will come under pressure in 2013 , due to the expected decline in purchase accounting accretion and assuming that the current low rate environment continues . noninterest income noninterest income totaled $ 5.9 billion for 2012 and $ 5.6 billion for 2011 . the overall increase in the comparison was primarily due to an increase in residential mortgage loan sales revenue driven by higher loan origination volume , gains on sales of visa class b common shares and higher corporate service fees , largely offset by higher provision for residential mortgage repurchase obligations . asset management revenue , including blackrock , totaled $ 1.2 billion in 2012 compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2011 . this increase was primarily due to higher earnings from our blackrock investment . discretionary assets under management increased to $ 112 billion at december 31 , 2012 compared with $ 107 billion at december 31 , 2011 driven by stronger average equity markets , positive net flows and strong sales performance . for 2012 , consumer services fees were $ 1.1 billion compared with $ 1.2 billion in 2011 . the decline reflected the regulatory impact of lower interchange fees on debit card transactions partially offset by customer growth . as further discussed in the retail banking portion of the business segments review section of this item 7 , the dodd-frank limits on interchange rates were effective october 1 , 2011 and had a negative impact on revenue of approximately $ 314 million in 2012 and $ 75 million in 2011 . this impact was partially offset by higher volumes of merchant , customer credit card and debit card transactions and the impact of the rbc bank ( usa ) acquisition . corporate services revenue increased by $ .3 billion , or 30 percent , to $ 1.2 billion in 2012 compared with $ .9 billion in 2011 due to higher commercial mortgage servicing revenue and higher merger and acquisition advisory fees in 2012 . the major components of corporate services revenue are treasury management revenue , corporate finance fees , including revenue from capital markets-related products and services , and commercial mortgage servicing revenue , including commercial mortgage banking activities . see the product revenue portion of this consolidated income statement review for further detail . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 39 .\nQuestion: what is the net change in net interest income from 2011 to 2012?\nAnswer: 940.0\nQuestion: what is the net interest income in 2011?\nAnswer: 8700.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\nAnswer: 0.10805\nQuestion: what is the negative impact on revenue from dodd-frank limits on interchange rates in 2012?\nAnswer: 314.0\nQuestion: what about in 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "75.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1815	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n13 . pension and other postretirement benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees in the united states and in certain of its international subsidiaries . as a result of plan design changes approved in 2011 , beginning on january 1 , 2013 , active participants in merck 2019s primary u.s . defined benefit pension plans are accruing pension benefits using new cash balance formulas based on age , service , pay and interest . however , during a transition period from january 1 , 2013 through december 31 , 2019 , participants will earn the greater of the benefit as calculated under the employee 2019s legacy final average pay formula or their new cash balance formula . for all years of service after december 31 , 2019 , participants will earn future benefits under only the cash balance formula . in addition , the company provides medical benefits , principally to its eligible u.s . retirees and their dependents , through its other postretirement benefit plans . the company uses december 31 as the year-end measurement date for all of its pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans . net periodic benefit cost the net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans consisted of the following components: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31</td><td>pension benefits 2013</td><td>pension benefits 2012</td><td>pension benefits 2011</td><td>pension benefits 2013</td><td>pension benefits 2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 682</td><td>$ 555</td><td>$ 619</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 110</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>665</td><td>661</td><td>718</td><td>107</td><td>121</td><td>141</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>-1097 ( 1097 )</td><td>-970 ( 970 )</td><td>-972 ( 972 )</td><td>-126 ( 126 )</td><td>-136 ( 136 )</td><td>-142 ( 142 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net amortization</td><td>336</td><td>185</td><td>201</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>termination benefits</td><td>58</td><td>27</td><td>59</td><td>50</td><td>18</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>curtailments</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-86 ( 86 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>23</td><td>18</td><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net periodic benefit cost</td><td>$ 644</td><td>$ 466</td><td>$ 543</td><td>$ 72</td><td>$ 43</td><td>$ 122</td></tr></table> the increase in net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans in 2013 as compared with 2012 is largely attributable to a change in the discount rate . the net periodic benefit cost attributable to u.s . pension plans included in the above table was $ 348 million in 2013 , $ 268 million in 2012 and $ 406 million in in connection with restructuring actions ( see note 3 ) , termination charges were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on pension and other postretirement benefit plans related to expanded eligibility for certain employees exiting merck . also , in connection with these restructuring activities , curtailments were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on pension and other postretirement benefit plans . in addition , settlements were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on certain domestic and international pension plans . table of contents .\nQuestion: what was the change in the net amortization from 2012 to 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "151.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5834	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nother long term debt in december 2012 , the company entered into a $ 50.0 million recourse loan collateralized by the land , buildings and tenant improvements comprising the company 2019s corporate headquarters . the loan has a seven year term and maturity date of december 2019 . the loan bears interest at one month libor plus a margin of 1.50% ( 1.50 % ) , and allows for prepayment without penalty . the loan includes covenants and events of default substantially consistent with the company 2019s credit agreement discussed above . the loan also requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including transfers of any interest in the property . as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 40.0 million and $ 42.0 million , respectively . the weighted average interest rate on the loan was 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the following are the scheduled maturities of long term debt as of december 31 , 2017 : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>63000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>25000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>86250</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023 and thereafter</td><td>600000</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total scheduled maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 801250</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>current maturities of long term debt</td><td>$ 27000</td></tr></table> interest expense , net was $ 34.5 million , $ 26.4 million , and $ 14.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.3 million , $ 1.2 million , and $ 0.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 7 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2017 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2017 as well as .\nQuestion: what was the interest expense net in 2016?\nAnswer: 26.4\nQuestion: and what was it in 2015?\nAnswer: 14.6\nQuestion: what was then, the change over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "11.8" } ]
CONVFINQA9466	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfederal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2006 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance december 31 2003</td><td>$ 514177</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>82551</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-1390 ( 1390 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance december 31 2004</td><td>595338</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>83656</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-15244 ( 15244 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2005</td><td>663750</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>89564</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-12807 ( 12807 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance december 31 2006</td><td>$ 740507</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what were the deductions during 2004?\nAnswer: 1390.0\nQuestion: what were the deductions during 2005?\nAnswer: 15244.0\nQuestion: what is the sum of those deductions?\nAnswer: 16634.0\nQuestion: what were the deductions during 2006?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "12807.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5146	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n31 , 2015 , the price was r$ 218/mwh . after the expiration of contract with eletropaulo , tiet ea's strategy is to contract most of its physical guarantee , as described in regulatory framework section below , and sell the remaining portion in the spot market . tiet ea's strategy is reassessed from time to time according to changes in market conditions , hydrology and other factors . tiet ea has been continuously selling its available energy from 2016 forward through medium-term bilateral contracts of three to five years . as of december 31 , 2016 , tiet ea's contracted portfolio position is 95% ( 95 % ) and 88% ( 88 % ) with average prices of r$ 157/ mwh and r$ 159/mwh ( inflation adjusted until december 2016 ) for 2016 and 2017 , respectively . as brazil is mostly a hydro-based country with energy prices highly tied to the hydrological situation , the deterioration of the hydrology since the beginning of 2014 caused an increase in energy prices going forward . tiet ea is closely monitoring and analyzing system supply conditions to support energy commercialization decisions . under the concession agreement , tiet ea has an obligation to increase its capacity by 15% ( 15 % ) . tiet ea , as well as other concession generators , have not yet met this requirement due to regulatory , environmental , hydrological and fuel constraints . the state of s e3o paulo does not have a sufficient potential for wind power and only has a small remaining potential for hydro projects . as such , the capacity increases in the state will mostly be derived from thermal gas capacity projects . due to the highly complex process to obtain an environmental license for coal projects , tiet ea decided to fulfill its obligation with gas-fired projects in line with the federal government plans . petrobras refuses to supply natural gas and to offer capacity in its pipelines and regasification terminals . therefore , there are no regulations for natural gas swaps in place , and it is unfeasible to bring natural gas to aes tiet ea . a legal case has been initiated by the state of s e3o paulo requiring the investment to be performed . tiet ea is in the process of analyzing options to meet the obligation . uruguaiana is a 640 mw gas-fired combined cycle power plant located in the town of uruguaiana in the state of rio grande do sul , commissioned in december 2000 . aes manages and has a 46% ( 46 % ) economic interest in the plant with the remaining interest held by bndes . the plant's operations were suspended in april 2009 due to the unavailability of gas . aes has evaluated several alternatives to bring gas supply on a competitive basis to uruguaiana . one of the challenges is the capacity restrictions on the argentinean pipeline , especially during the winter season when gas demand in argentina is very high . the plant operated on a short-term basis during february and march 2013 , march through may 2014 , and february through may 2015 due to the short-term supply of lng for the facility . the plant did not operate in 2016 . uruguaiana continues to work toward securing gas on a long-term basis . market structure 2014 brazil has installed capacity of 150136 mw , which is 65% ( 65 % ) hydroelectric , 19% ( 19 % ) thermal and 16% ( 16 % ) renewable ( biomass and wind ) . brazil's national grid is divided into four subsystems . tiet ea is in the southeast and uruguaiana is in the south subsystems of the national grid . regulatory framework 2014 in brazil , the ministry of mines and energy determines the maximum amount of energy that a plant can sell , called physical guarantee , which represents the long-term average expected energy production of the plant . under current rules , physical guarantee can be sold to distribution companies through long- term regulated auctions or under unregulated bilateral contracts with large consumers or energy trading companies . the national system operator ( \"ons\" ) is responsible for coordinating and controlling the operation of the national grid . the ons dispatches generators based on hydrological conditions , reservoir levels , electricity demand and the prices of fuel and thermal generation . given the importance of hydro generation in the country , the ons sometimes reduces dispatch of hydro facilities and increases dispatch of thermal facilities to protect reservoir levels in the system . in brazil , the system operator controls all hydroelectric generation dispatch and reservoir levels . a mechanism known as the energy reallocation mechanism ( \"mre\" ) was created to share hydrological risk across mre hydro generators . if the hydro plants generate less than the total mre physical guarantee , the hydro generators may need to purchase energy in the short-term market to fulfill their contract obligations . when total hydro generation is higher than the total mre physical guarantee , the surplus is proportionally shared among its participants and they are able to make extra revenue selling the excess energy on the spot market . the consequences of unfavorable hydrology are ( i ) thermal plants more expensive to the system being dispatched , ( ii ) lower hydropower generation with deficits in the mre and ( iii ) high spot prices . aneel defines the spot price cap for electricity in the brazilian market . the spot price caps as defined by aneel and average spot prices by calendar year are as follows ( r$ / . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>spot price cap as defined by aneel</td><td>534</td><td>423</td><td>388</td><td>822</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average spot rate</td><td>-</td><td>94</td><td>287</td><td>689</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the average spot rate in 2015?\nAnswer: 287.0\nQuestion: and for 2014?\nAnswer: 689.0\nQuestion: so what was the difference between these two values?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-402.0" } ]
CONVFINQA496	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 10 . commitments and contingencies credit-related commitments and contingencies : credit-related financial instruments , which are off-balance sheet , include indemnified securities financing , unfunded commitments to extend credit or purchase assets , and standby letters of credit . the potential loss associated with indemnified securities financing , unfunded commitments and standby letters of credit is equal to the total gross contractual amount , which does not consider the value of any collateral . the following table summarizes the total gross contractual amounts of credit-related off-balance sheet financial instruments at december 31 . amounts reported do not reflect participations to independent third parties. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indemnified securities financing</td><td>$ 365251</td><td>$ 324590</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>asset purchase agreements ( 1 )</td><td>8211</td><td>31780</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>unfunded commitments to extend credit</td><td>18078</td><td>20981</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit</td><td>4784</td><td>6061</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amount for 2009 excludes agreements related to the commercial paper conduits , which were consolidated in may 2009 ; see note 11 . approximately 81% ( 81 % ) of the unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year from the date of issue . since many of these commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon , the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements . securities finance : on behalf of our customers , we lend their securities to creditworthy brokers and other institutions . we generally indemnify our customers for the fair market value of those securities against a failure of the borrower to return such securities . collateral funds received in connection with our securities finance services are held by us as agent and are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . we require the borrowers to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the fair market value of the securities borrowed . the borrowed securities are revalued daily to determine if additional collateral is necessary . in this regard , we held , as agent , cash and u.s . government securities with an aggregate fair value of $ 375.92 billion and $ 333.07 billion as collateral for indemnified securities on loan at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , presented in the table above . the collateral held by us is invested on behalf of our customers in accordance with their guidelines . in certain cases , the collateral is invested in third-party repurchase agreements , for which we indemnify the customer against loss of the principal invested . we require the repurchase agreement counterparty to provide collateral in an amount equal to or in excess of 100% ( 100 % ) of the amount of the repurchase agreement . the indemnified repurchase agreements and the related collateral are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition . of the collateral of $ 375.92 billion at december 31 , 2009 and $ 333.07 billion at december 31 , 2008 referenced above , $ 77.73 billion at december 31 , 2009 and $ 68.37 billion at december 31 , 2008 was invested in indemnified repurchase agreements . we held , as agent , cash and securities with an aggregate fair value of $ 82.62 billion and $ 71.87 billion as collateral for indemnified investments in repurchase agreements at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 , respectively . legal proceedings : in the ordinary course of business , we and our subsidiaries are involved in disputes , litigation and regulatory inquiries and investigations , both pending and threatened . these matters , if resolved adversely against us , may result in monetary damages , fines and penalties or require changes in our business practices . the resolution of these proceedings is inherently difficult to predict . however , we do not believe that the amount of any judgment , settlement or other action arising from any pending proceeding will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , although the outcome of certain of the matters described below may have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations for the period in which such matter is resolved .\nQuestion: what was the total in asset purchase agreements in 2009?\nAnswer: 8211.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "31780.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5060	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nalthough many clients use both active and passive strategies , the application of these strategies differs greatly . for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class pending reallocation to an active manager . this has the effect of increasing turnover of index aum . in addition , institutional non-etp index assignments tend to be very large ( multi- billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates . this has the potential to exaggerate the significance of net flows in institutional index products on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings . equity year-end 2012 equity aum of $ 1.845 trillion increased by $ 285.4 billion , or 18% ( 18 % ) , from the end of 2011 , largely due to flows into regional , country-specific and global mandates and the effect of higher market valuations . equity aum growth included $ 54.0 billion in net new business and $ 3.6 billion in new assets related to the acquisition of claymore . net new business of $ 54.0 billion was driven by net inflows of $ 53.0 billion and $ 19.1 billion into ishares and non-etp index accounts , respectively . passive inflows were offset by active net outflows of $ 18.1 billion , with net outflows of $ 10.0 billion and $ 8.1 billion from fundamental and scientific active equity products , respectively . passive strategies represented 84% ( 84 % ) of equity aum with the remaining 16% ( 16 % ) in active mandates . institutional investors represented 62% ( 62 % ) of equity aum , while ishares , and retail and hnw represented 29% ( 29 % ) and 9% ( 9 % ) , respectively . at year-end 2012 , 63% ( 63 % ) of equity aum was managed for clients in the americas ( defined as the united states , caribbean , canada , latin america and iberia ) compared with 28% ( 28 % ) and 9% ( 9 % ) managed for clients in emea and asia-pacific , respectively . blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aum mix . approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than similar u.s . equity strategies . accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which do not consistently move in tandem with u.s . markets , may have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s effective equity fee rates and revenues . fixed income fixed income aum ended 2012 at $ 1.259 trillion , rising $ 11.6 billion , or 1% ( 1 % ) , relative to december 31 , 2011 . growth in aum reflected $ 43.3 billion in net new business , excluding the two large previously mentioned low-fee outflows , $ 75.4 billion in market and foreign exchange gains and $ 3.0 billion in new assets related to claymore . net new business was led by flows into domestic specialty and global bond mandates , with net inflows of $ 28.8 billion , $ 13.6 billion and $ 3.1 billion into ishares , non-etp index and model-based products , respectively , partially offset by net outflows of $ 2.2 billion from fundamental strategies . fixed income aum was split between passive and active strategies with 48% ( 48 % ) and 52% ( 52 % ) , respectively . institutional investors represented 74% ( 74 % ) of fixed income aum while ishares and retail and hnw represented 15% ( 15 % ) and 11% ( 11 % ) , respectively . at year-end 2012 , 59% ( 59 % ) of fixed income aum was managed for clients in the americas compared with 33% ( 33 % ) and 8% ( 8 % ) managed for clients in emea and asia- pacific , respectively . multi-asset class component changes in multi-asset class aum ( dollar amounts in millions ) 12/31/2011 net new business acquired market /fx app ( dep ) 12/31/2012 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollar amounts in millions )</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>net new business</td><td>net acquired</td><td>market /fx app ( dep )</td><td>12/31/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>asset allocation</td><td>$ 126067</td><td>$ 1575</td><td>$ 78</td><td>$ 12440</td><td>$ 140160</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>target date/risk</td><td>49063</td><td>14526</td><td>2014</td><td>6295</td><td>69884</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fiduciary</td><td>50040</td><td>-284 ( 284 )</td><td>2014</td><td>7948</td><td>57704</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>multi-asset</td><td>$ 225170</td><td>$ 15817</td><td>$ 78</td><td>$ 26683</td><td>$ 267748</td></tr></table> multi-asset class aum totaled $ 267.7 billion at year-end 2012 , up 19% ( 19 % ) , or $ 42.6 billion , reflecting $ 15.8 billion in net new business and $ 26.7 billion in portfolio valuation gains . blackrock 2019s multi-asset class team manages a variety of bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , currencies , bonds and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities . investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays . at december 31 , 2012 , institutional investors represented 66% ( 66 % ) of multi-asset class aum , while retail and hnw accounted for the remaining aum . additionally , 58% ( 58 % ) of multi-asset class aum is managed for clients based in the americas with 37% ( 37 % ) and 5% ( 5 % ) managed for clients in emea and asia-pacific , respectively . flows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our advice in an increasingly .\nQuestion: what is the net change in value of asset allocation from 2011 to 2012?\nAnswer: 14093.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.11179" } ]
CONVFINQA8746	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npage 74 notes to five year summary ( a ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) ) which , on a combined basis , increased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 173 million , $ 113 million after tax ( $ 0.25 per share ) . ( b ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 215 million , $ 154 million after tax ( $ 0.34 per share ) . also includes a reduction in income tax expense resulting from the closure of an internal revenue service examination of $ 144 million ( $ 0.32 per share ) . these items reduced earnings by $ 10 million after tax ( $ 0.02 per share ) . ( c ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 153 million , $ 102 million after tax ( $ 0.22 per share ) . ( d ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 1112 million , $ 632 million after tax ( $ 1.40 per share ) . in 2002 , the corporation adopted fas 142 which prohibits the amortization of goodwill . ( e ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 973 million , $ 651 million after tax ( $ 1.50 per share ) . also includes a gain from the disposal of a business and charges for the corporation 2019s exit from its global telecommunications services business which is included in discontinued operations and which , on a combined basis , increased the net loss by $ 1 billion ( $ 2.38 per share ) . ( f ) the corporation defines return on invested capital ( roic ) as net income plus after-tax interest expense divided by average invested capital ( stockholders 2019 equity plus debt ) , after adjusting stockholders 2019 equity by adding back the minimum pension liability . the adjustment to add back the minimum pension liability is a revision to our calculation in 2005 , which the corporation believes more closely links roic to management performance . further , the corporation believes that reporting roic provides investors with greater visibility into how effectively lockheed martin uses the capital invested in its operations . the corporation uses roic to evaluate multi-year investment decisions and as a long-term performance measure , and also uses roic as a factor in evaluating management performance under certain incentive compensation plans . roic is not a measure of financial performance under gaap , and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner . roic should not be considered in isola- tion or as an alternative to net earnings as an indicator of performance . the following calculations of roic reflect the revision to the calculation discussed above for all periods presented . ( in millions ) 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings</td><td>$ 1825</td><td>$ 1266</td><td>$ 1053</td><td>$ 500</td><td>$ -1046 ( 1046 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense ( multiplied by 65% ( 65 % ) ) 1</td><td>241</td><td>276</td><td>317</td><td>378</td><td>455</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>return</td><td>$ 2066</td><td>$ 1542</td><td>$ 1370</td><td>$ 878</td><td>$ -591 ( 591 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average debt2 5</td><td>$ 5077</td><td>$ 5932</td><td>$ 6612</td><td>$ 7491</td><td>$ 8782</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>average equity3 5</td><td>7590</td><td>7015</td><td>6170</td><td>6853</td><td>7221</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>average minimum pension liability3 4 5</td><td>1545</td><td>1296</td><td>1504</td><td>341</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>average invested capital</td><td>$ 14212</td><td>$ 14243</td><td>$ 14286</td><td>$ 14685</td><td>$ 16009</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>return on invested capital</td><td>14.5% ( 14.5 % )</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>9.6% ( 9.6 % )</td><td>6.0% ( 6.0 % )</td><td>( 3.7 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> 1 represents after-tax interest expense utilizing the federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) . 2 debt consists of long-term debt , including current maturities , and short-term borrowings ( if any ) . 3 equity includes non-cash adjustments for other comprehensive losses , primarily for the additional minimum pension liability . 4 minimum pension liability values reflect the cumulative value of entries identified in our statement of stockholders equity under the caption 201cminimum pension liability . 201d the annual minimum pension liability adjustments to equity were : 2001 = ( $ 33 million ) ; 2002 = ( $ 1537 million ) ; 2003 = $ 331 million ; 2004 = ( $ 285 million ) ; 2005 = ( $ 105 million ) . as these entries are recorded in the fourth quarter , the value added back to our average equity in a given year is the cumulative impact of all prior year entries plus 20% ( 20 % ) of the cur- rent year entry value . 5 yearly averages are calculated using balances at the start of the year and at the end of each quarter . lockheed martin corporation .\nQuestion: what is the net earnings in 2005?\nAnswer: 1825.0\nQuestion: what about in 2004?\nAnswer: 1266.0\nQuestion: what is the increase in net earnings?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "559.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9666	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following is a summary of our floor space by business segment at december 31 , 2010 : ( square feet in millions ) owned leased government- owned total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( square feet in millions )</td><td>owned</td><td>leased</td><td>government-owned</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>aeronautics</td><td>5.2</td><td>3.7</td><td>15.2</td><td>24.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>electronic systems</td><td>10.3</td><td>11.5</td><td>7.1</td><td>28.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>information systems & global solutions</td><td>2.6</td><td>7.9</td><td>2014</td><td>10.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>space systems</td><td>8.6</td><td>1.6</td><td>.9</td><td>11.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>corporate activities</td><td>2.9</td><td>.8</td><td>2014</td><td>3.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>29.6</td><td>25.5</td><td>23.2</td><td>78.3</td></tr></table> some of our owned properties , primarily classified under corporate activities , are leased to third parties . in the area of manufacturing , most of the operations are of a job-order nature , rather than an assembly line process , and productive equipment has multiple uses for multiple products . management believes that all of our major physical facilities are in good condition and are adequate for their intended use . item 3 . legal proceedings we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment . we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole , notwithstanding that the unfavorable resolution of any matter may have a material effect on our net earnings in any particular quarter . we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty . these matters include the proceedings summarized in note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments , and contingencies beginning on page 78 of this form 10-k . from time-to-time , agencies of the u.s . government investigate whether our operations are being conducted in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements . u.s . government investigations of us , whether relating to government contracts or conducted for other reasons , could result in administrative , civil , or criminal liabilities , including repayments , fines , or penalties being imposed upon us , or could lead to suspension or debarment from future u.s . government contracting . u.s . government investigations often take years to complete and many result in no adverse action against us . we are subject to federal and state requirements for protection of the environment , including those for discharge of hazardous materials and remediation of contaminated sites . as a result , we are a party to or have our property subject to various lawsuits or proceedings involving environmental protection matters . due in part to their complexity and pervasiveness , such requirements have resulted in us being involved with related legal proceedings , claims , and remediation obligations . the extent of our financial exposure cannot in all cases be reasonably estimated at this time . for information regarding these matters , including current estimates of the amounts that we believe are required for remediation or clean-up to the extent estimable , see 201ccritical accounting policies 2013 environmental matters 201d in management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations beginning on page 45 , and note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments , and contingencies beginning on page 78 of this form 10-k . item 4 . ( removed and reserved ) item 4 ( a ) . executive officers of the registrant our executive officers are listed below , as well as information concerning their age at december 31 , 2010 , positions and offices held with the corporation , and principal occupation and business experience over the past five years . there were no family relationships among any of our executive officers and directors . all officers serve at the pleasure of the board of directors . linda r . gooden ( 57 ) , executive vice president 2013 information systems & global solutions ms . gooden has served as executive vice president 2013 information systems & global solutions since january 2007 . she previously served as deputy executive vice president 2013 information & technology services from october 2006 to december 2006 , and president , lockheed martin information technology from september 1997 to december 2006 . christopher j . gregoire ( 42 ) , vice president and controller ( chief accounting officer ) mr . gregoire has served as vice president and controller ( chief accounting officer ) since march 2010 . he previously was employed by sprint nextel corporation from august 2006 to may 2009 , most recently as principal accounting officer and assistant controller , and was a partner at deloitte & touche llp from september 2003 to july 2006. .\nQuestion: as december 31, 2010, what is the floor space, in square feet, that is owned by the company?\nAnswer: 29.6\nQuestion: and what is the total floor space?\nAnswer: 78.3\nQuestion: what is, then, that owned floor space as a portion of this total one?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.37803" } ]
CONVFINQA8383	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nloan commitments ( unfunded loans and unused lines of credit ) , asset purchase agreements , standby letters of credit and letters of credit are issued to accommodate the financing needs of state street 2019s clients and to provide credit enhancements to special purpose entities . loan commitments are agreements by state street to lend monies at a future date . asset purchase agreements are commitments to purchase receivables or securities , subject to conditions established in the agreements , and at december 31 , 2001 , include $ 8.0 billion outstanding to special purpose entities . standby letters of credit and letters of credit commit state street to make payments on behalf of clients and special purpose entities when certain specified events occur . standby letters of credit outstanding to special purpose entities were $ 608 million at december 31 , 2001 . these loan , asset purchase and letter of credit commitments are subject to the same credit policies and reviews as loans . the amount and nature of collateral are obtained based upon management 2019s assessment of the credit risk . approximately 89% ( 89 % ) of the loan commitments and asset purchase agreements expire within one year from the date of issue . sincemany of the commitments are expected to expire or renewwithout being drawn , the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements . the following is a summary of the contractual amount of credit-related , off-balance sheet financial instruments at december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indemnified securities on loan</td><td>$ 113047</td><td>$ 101438</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loan commitments</td><td>12962</td><td>11367</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asset purchase agreements</td><td>10366</td><td>7112</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>standby letters of credit</td><td>3918</td><td>4028</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>letters of credit</td><td>164</td><td>218</td></tr></table> state street corporation 53 .\nQuestion: what was the net change in value of letters of credit from 2000 to 2001?\nAnswer: -54.0\nQuestion: what is that divided by the 2000 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.24771" } ]
CONVFINQA9978	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nour non-operating investment activity resulted in net losses of $ 12.7 million in 2009 and $ 52.3 million in 2008 . the improvement of nearly $ 40 million is primarily attributable to a reduction in the other than temporary impairments recognized on our investments in sponsored mutual funds in 2009 versus 2008 . the following table details our related mutual fund investment gains and losses ( in millions ) during the past two years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other than temporary impairments recognized</td><td>$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )</td><td>$ -36.1 ( 36.1 )</td><td>$ 55.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital gain distributions received</td><td>5.6</td><td>2.0</td><td>-3.6 ( 3.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gain ( loss ) realized on fund dispositions</td><td>-4.5 ( 4.5 )</td><td>7.4</td><td>11.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net loss recognized on fund holdings</td><td>$ -90.2 ( 90.2 )</td><td>$ -26.7 ( 26.7 )</td><td>$ 63.5</td></tr></table> lower income of $ 16 million from our money market holdings due to the significantly lower interest rate environment offset the improvement experienced with our fund investments . there is no impairment of any of our mutual fund investments at december 31 , 2009 . the 2009 provision for income taxes as a percentage of pretax income is 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) , down from 38.4% ( 38.4 % ) in 2008 and .9% ( .9 % ) lower than our present estimate of 38.0% ( 38.0 % ) for the 2010 effective tax rate . our 2009 provision includes reductions of prior years 2019 tax provisions and discrete nonrecurring benefits that lowered our 2009 effective tax rate by 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) . 2008 versus 2007 . investment advisory revenues decreased 6.3% ( 6.3 % ) , or $ 118 million , to $ 1.76 billion in 2008 as average assets under our management decreased $ 16 billion to $ 358.2 billion . the average annualized fee rate earned on our assets under management was 49.2 basis points in 2008 , down from the 50.2 basis points earned in 2007 , as lower equity market valuations resulted in a greater percentage of our assets under management being attributable to lower fee fixed income portfolios . continuing stress on the financial markets and resulting lower equity valuations as 2008 progressed resulted in lower average assets under our management , lower investment advisory fees and lower net income as compared to prior periods . net revenues decreased 5% ( 5 % ) , or $ 112 million , to $ 2.12 billion . operating expenses were $ 1.27 billion in 2008 , up 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) or $ 36 million from 2007 . net operating income for 2008 decreased $ 147.9 million , or 14.8% ( 14.8 % ) , to $ 848.5 million . higher operating expenses in 2008 and decreased market valuations during the latter half of 2008 , which lowered our assets under management and advisory revenues , resulted in our 2008 operating margin declining to 40.1% ( 40.1 % ) from 44.7% ( 44.7 % ) in 2007 . non-operating investment losses in 2008 were $ 52.3 million as compared to investment income of $ 80.4 million in 2007 . investment losses in 2008 include non-cash charges of $ 91.3 million for the other than temporary impairment of certain of the firm 2019s investments in sponsored mutual funds . net income in 2008 fell 27% ( 27 % ) or nearly $ 180 million from 2007 . diluted earnings per share , after the retrospective application of new accounting guidance effective in 2009 , decreased to $ 1.81 , down $ .59 or 24.6% ( 24.6 % ) from $ 2.40 in 2007 . a non-operating charge to recognize other than temporary impairments of our sponsored mutual fund investments reduced diluted earnings per share by $ .21 in 2008 . investment advisory revenues earned from the t . rowe price mutual funds distributed in the united states decreased 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) , or $ 114.5 million , to $ 1.24 billion . average mutual fund assets were $ 216.1 billion in 2008 , down $ 16.7 billion from 2007 . mutual fund assets at december 31 , 2008 , were $ 164.4 billion , down $ 81.6 billion from the end of 2007 . net inflows to the mutual funds during 2008 were $ 3.9 billion , including $ 1.9 billion to the money funds , $ 1.1 billion to the bond funds , and $ .9 billion to the stock funds . the value , equity index 500 , and emerging markets stock funds combined to add $ 4.1 billion , while the mid-cap growth and equity income stock funds had net redemptions of $ 2.2 billion . net fund inflows of $ 6.2 billion originated in our target-date retirement funds , which in turn invest in other t . rowe price funds . fund net inflow amounts in 2008 are presented net of $ 1.3 billion that was transferred to target-date trusts from the retirement funds during the year . decreases in market valuations and income not reinvested lowered our mutual fund assets under management by $ 85.5 billion during 2008 . investment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 3.6 million to $ 522.2 million . average assets in these portfolios were $ 142.1 billion during 2008 , up slightly from $ 141.4 billion in 2007 . these minor changes , each less than 1% ( 1 % ) , are attributable to the timing of declining equity market valuations and cash flows among our separate account and subadvised portfolios . net inflows , primarily from institutional investors , were $ 13.2 billion during 2008 , including the $ 1.3 billion transferred from the retirement funds to target-date trusts . decreases in market valuations , net of income , lowered our assets under management in these portfolios by $ 55.3 billion during 2008 . management 2019s discussion & analysis 21 .\nQuestion: what is the net revenues of 2009 in million?\nAnswer: 2120.0\nQuestion: what is the net revenues decrease from 2008 to 2009 in million?\nAnswer: 112.0\nQuestion: what is the net revenues of 2008 in million?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2232.0" } ]
CONVFINQA423	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance based restricted stock awards is generally recognized using the accelerated amortization method with each vesting tranche valued as a separate award , with a separate vesting date , consistent with the estimated value of the award at each period end . additionally , compensation expense is adjusted for actual forfeitures for all awards in the period that the award was forfeited . compensation expense for stock options is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period . maa presents stock compensation expense in the consolidated statements of operations in \"general and administrative expenses\" . effective january 1 , 2017 , the company adopted asu 2016-09 , improvements to employee share- based payment accounting , which allows employers to make a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur . the company elected this option using the modified retrospective transition method , with a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings , and there was no material effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations taken as a whole resulting from the reversal of previously estimated forfeitures . total compensation expense under the stock plan was approximately $ 10.8 million , $ 12.2 million and $ 6.9 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . of these amounts , total compensation expense capitalized was approximately $ 0.2 million , $ 0.7 million and $ 0.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2017 , the total unrecognized compensation expense was approximately $ 14.1 million . this cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted average period of 1.2 years . total cash paid for the settlement of plan shares totaled $ 4.8 million , $ 2.0 million and $ 1.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . information concerning grants under the stock plan is listed below . restricted stock in general , restricted stock is earned based on either a service condition , performance condition , or market condition , or a combination thereof , and generally vests ratably over a period from 1 year to 5 years . service based awards are earned when the employee remains employed over the requisite service period and are valued on the grant date based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant . market based awards are earned when maa reaches a specified stock price or specified return on the stock price ( price appreciation plus dividends ) and are valued on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation . performance based awards are earned when maa reaches certain operational goals such as funds from operations , or ffo , targets and are valued based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant as well as the probability of reaching the stated targets . maa remeasures the fair value of the performance based awards each balance sheet date with adjustments made on a cumulative basis until the award is settled and the final compensation is known . the weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , was $ 84.53 , $ 73.20 and $ 68.35 , respectively . the following is a summary of the key assumptions used in the valuation calculations for market based awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk free rate</td><td>0.65% ( 0.65 % ) - 1.57% ( 1.57 % )</td><td>0.49% ( 0.49 % ) - 1.27% ( 1.27 % )</td><td>0.10% ( 0.10 % ) - 1.05% ( 1.05 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>3.573% ( 3.573 % )</td><td>3.634% ( 3.634 % )</td><td>3.932% ( 3.932 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility</td><td>20.43% ( 20.43 % ) - 21.85% ( 21.85 % )</td><td>18.41% ( 18.41 % ) - 19.45% ( 19.45 % )</td><td>15.41% ( 15.41 % ) - 16.04% ( 16.04 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>requisite service period</td><td>3 years</td><td>3 years</td><td>3 years</td></tr></table> the risk free rate was based on a zero coupon risk-free rate . the minimum risk free rate was based on a period of 0.25 years for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 . the maximum risk free rate was based on a period of 3 years for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 . the dividend yield was based on the closing stock price of maa stock on the date of grant . volatility for maa was obtained by using a blend of both historical and implied volatility calculations . historical volatility was based on the standard deviation of daily total continuous returns , and implied volatility was based on the trailing month average of daily implied volatilities interpolating between the volatilities implied by stock call option contracts that were closest to the terms shown and closest to the money . the minimum volatility was based on a period of 3 years , 2 years and 1 year for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the maximum volatility was based on a period of 1 year , 1 year and 2 years for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the requisite service period is based on the criteria for the separate programs according to the vesting schedule. .\nQuestion: what was the total compensation expense under the stock plan in the year of 2016?\nAnswer: 12.2\nQuestion: ad what was it for 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "6.9" } ]
CONVFINQA6096	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents the company concluded that the acquisition of sentinelle medical did not represent a material business combination , and therefore , no pro forma financial information has been provided herein . subsequent to the acquisition date , the company 2019s results of operations include the results of sentinelle medical , which is included within the company 2019s breast health reporting segment . the company accounted for the sentinelle medical acquisition as a purchase of a business under asc 805 . the purchase price was comprised of an $ 84.8 million cash payment , which was net of certain adjustments , plus three contingent payments up to a maximum of an additional $ 250.0 million in cash . the contingent payments are based on a multiple of incremental revenue growth during the two-year period following the completion of the acquisition as follows : six months after acquisition , 12 months after acquisition , and 24 months after acquisition . pursuant to asc 805 , the company recorded its estimate of the fair value of the contingent consideration liability based on future revenue projections of the sentinelle medical business under various potential scenarios and weighted probability assumptions of these outcomes . as of the date of acquisition , these cash flow projections were discounted using a rate of 16.5% ( 16.5 % ) . the discount rate is based on the weighted-average cost of capital of the acquired business plus a credit risk premium for non-performance risk related to the liability pursuant to asc 820 . this analysis resulted in an initial contingent consideration liability of $ 29.5 million , which will be adjusted periodically as a component of operating expenses based on changes in the fair value of the liability driven by the accretion of the liability for the time value of money and changes in the assumptions pertaining to the achievement of the defined revenue growth milestones . this fair value measurement was based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represented a level 3 measurement as defined in asc during each quarter in fiscal 2011 , the company has re-evaluated its assumptions and updated the revenue and probability assumptions for future earn-out periods and lowered its projections . as a result of these adjustments , which were partially offset by the accretion of the liability , and using a current discount rate of approximately 17.0% ( 17.0 % ) , the company recorded a reversal of expense of $ 14.3 million in fiscal 2011 to record the contingent consideration liability at fair value . in addition , during the second quarter of fiscal 2011 , the first earn-out period ended , and the company adjusted the fair value of the contingent consideration liability for actual results during the earn-out period . this payment of $ 4.3 million was made in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 . at september 24 , 2011 , the fair value of the liability is $ 10.9 million . the company did not issue any equity awards in connection with this acquisition . the company incurred third-party transaction costs of $ 1.2 million , which were expensed within general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2010 . the purchase price was as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash</td><td>$ 84751</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>contingent consideration</td><td>29500</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total purchase price</td><td>$ 114251</td></tr></table> source : hologic inc , 10-k , november 23 , 2011 powered by morningstar ae document research 2120 the information contained herein may not be copied , adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate , complete or timely . the user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information , except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law . past financial performance is no guarantee of future results. .\nQuestion: what portion of the sentinelle medical's purchase price was paid in cash?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.7418" } ]
CONVFINQA8913	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nin september 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no . 158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) . 201d this standard eliminated the requirement for a 201cminimum pension liability adjustment 201d that was previously required under sfas no . 87 and required employers to recognize the underfunded or overfunded status of a defined benefit plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position . in 2006 , as a result of the implementation of sfas no . 158 , the company recognized an after-tax decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income of $ 1.187 billion and $ 513 million for the u.s . and international pension benefit plans , respectively , and $ 218 million for the postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plan . see note 11 for additional detail . reclassification adjustments are made to avoid double counting in comprehensive income items that are also recorded as part of net income . in 2007 , as disclosed in the net periodic benefit cost table in note 11 , $ 198 million pre-tax ( $ 123 million after-tax ) were reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income to pension and postretirement expense in the income statement . these pension and postretirement expense amounts are shown in the table in note 11 as amortization of transition ( asset ) obligation , amortization of prior service cost ( benefit ) and amortization of net actuarial ( gain ) loss . other reclassification adjustments ( except for cash flow hedging instruments adjustments provided in note 12 ) were not material . no tax provision has been made for the translation of foreign currency financial statements into u.s . dollars . note 7 . supplemental cash flow information . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash income tax payments</td><td>$ 1999</td><td>$ 1842</td><td>$ 1277</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash interest payments</td><td>162</td><td>119</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>capitalized interest</td><td>25</td><td>16</td><td>12</td></tr></table> individual amounts in the consolidated statement of cash flows exclude the impacts of acquisitions , divestitures and exchange rate impacts , which are presented separately . 201cother 2013 net 201d in the consolidated statement of cash flows within operating activities in 2007 and 2006 includes changes in liabilities related to 3m 2019s restructuring actions ( note 4 ) and in 2005 includes the non-cash impact of adopting fin 47 ( $ 35 million cumulative effect of accounting change ) . transactions related to investing and financing activities with significant non-cash components are as follows : in 2007 , 3m purchased certain assets of diamond productions , inc . for approximately 150 thousand shares of 3m common stock , which has a market value of approximately $ 13 million at the acquisition 2019s measurement date . liabilities assumed from acquisitions are provided in the tables in note 2. .\nQuestion: what was the amount reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income to pension and post retirement expense pre-tax?\nAnswer: 198.0\nQuestion: and what was it, after-tax?\nAnswer: 123.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change caused by the tax?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "75.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7908	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nstock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard a0& poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index . the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december a031 , 2012 and that all dividends were reinvested . market performance . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company / index</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>teleflex incorporated</td><td>100</td><td>134</td><td>166</td><td>192</td><td>237</td><td>368</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>132</td><td>151</td><td>153</td><td>171</td><td>208</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index</td><td>100</td><td>128</td><td>161</td><td>171</td><td>181</td><td>238</td></tr></table> s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 128 161 171 181 238 .\nQuestion: what was the price of teleflex in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "368.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3213	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n9 . junior subordinated debt securities payable in accordance with the provisions of the junior subordinated debt securities which were issued on march 29 , 2004 , holdings elected to redeem the $ 329897 thousand of 6.2% ( 6.2 % ) junior subordinated debt securities outstanding on may 24 , 2013 . as a result of the early redemption , the company incurred pre-tax expense of $ 7282 thousand related to the immediate amortization of the remaining capitalized issuance costs on the trust preferred securities . interest expense incurred in connection with these junior subordinated debt securities is as follows for the periods indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in thousands )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest expense incurred</td><td>$ -</td><td>$ 8181</td><td>$ 20454</td></tr></table> holdings considered the mechanisms and obligations relating to the trust preferred securities , taken together , constituted a full and unconditional guarantee by holdings of capital trust ii 2019s payment obligations with respect to their trust preferred securities . 10 . reinsurance and trust agreements certain subsidiaries of group have established trust agreements , which effectively use the company 2019s investments as collateral , as security for assumed losses payable to certain non-affiliated ceding companies . at december 31 , 2014 , the total amount on deposit in trust accounts was $ 322285 thousand . on april 24 , 2014 , the company entered into two collateralized reinsurance agreements with kilimanjaro re limited ( 201ckilimanjaro 201d ) , a bermuda based special purpose reinsurer , to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . these agreements are multi-year reinsurance contracts which cover specified named storm and earthquake events . the first agreement provides up to $ 250000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms in specified states of the southeastern united states . the second agreement provides up to $ 200000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms in specified states of the southeast , mid-atlantic and northeast regions of the united states and puerto rico as well as reinsurance coverage from earthquakes in specified states of the southeast , mid-atlantic , northeast and west regions of the united states , puerto rico and british columbia . on november 18 , 2014 , the company entered into a collateralized reinsurance agreement with kilimanjaro re to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . this agreement is a multi-year reinsurance contract which covers specified earthquake events . the agreement provides up to $ 500000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from earthquakes in the united states , puerto rico and canada . kilimanjaro has financed the various property catastrophe reinsurance coverage by issuing catastrophe bonds to unrelated , external investors . on april 24 , 2014 , kilimanjaro issued $ 450000 thousand of variable rate notes ( 201cseries 2014-1 notes 201d ) . on november 18 , 2014 , kilimanjaro issued $ 500000 thousand of variable rate notes ( 201cseries 2014-2 notes 201d ) . the proceeds from the issuance of the series 2014-1 notes and the series 2014-2 notes are held in reinsurance trust throughout the duration of the applicable reinsurance agreements and invested solely in us government money market funds with a rating of at least 201caaam 201d by standard & poor 2019s. .\nQuestion: what was the interest expense in 2013, in thousands of dollars?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "8181.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8443	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents certain union-represented american mainline employees are covered by agreements that are not currently amendable . until those agreements become amendable , negotiations for jcbas will be conducted outside the traditional rla bargaining process described above , and , in the meantime , no self-help will be permissible . the piedmont mechanics and stock clerks and the psa dispatchers have agreements that are now amendable and are engaged in traditional rla negotiations . none of the unions representing our employees presently may lawfully engage in concerted refusals to work , such as strikes , slow-downs , sick-outs or other similar activity , against us . nonetheless , there is a risk that disgruntled employees , either with or without union involvement , could engage in one or more concerted refusals to work that could individually or collectively harm the operation of our airline and impair our financial performance . for more discussion , see part i , item 1a . risk factors 2013 201cunion disputes , employee strikes and other labor-related disruptions may adversely affect our operations . 201d aircraft fuel our operations and financial results are significantly affected by the availability and price of jet fuel . based on our 2016 forecasted mainline and regional fuel consumption , we estimate that , as of december 31 , 2015 , a one cent per gallon increase in aviation fuel price would increase our 2016 annual fuel expense by $ 44 million . the following table shows annual aircraft fuel consumption and costs , including taxes , for our mainline operations for 2015 and 2014 ( gallons and aircraft fuel expense in millions ) . year gallons average price per gallon aircraft fuel expense percent of total mainline operating expenses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>gallons</td><td>average price pergallon</td><td>aircraft fuel expense</td><td>percent of total mainline operating expenses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>3611</td><td>$ 1.72</td><td>$ 6226</td><td>21.6% ( 21.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>3644</td><td>2.91</td><td>10592</td><td>33.2% ( 33.2 % )</td></tr></table> total fuel expenses for our wholly-owned and third-party regional carriers operating under capacity purchase agreements of american were $ 1.2 billion and $ 2.0 billion for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2015 , we did not have any fuel hedging contracts outstanding to hedge our fuel consumption . as such , and assuming we do not enter into any future transactions to hedge our fuel consumption , we will continue to be fully exposed to fluctuations in fuel prices . our current policy is not to enter into transactions to hedge our fuel consumption , although we review that policy from time to time based on market conditions and other factors . fuel prices have fluctuated substantially over the past several years . we cannot predict the future availability , price volatility or cost of aircraft fuel . natural disasters , political disruptions or wars involving oil-producing countries , changes in fuel-related governmental policy , the strength of the u.s . dollar against foreign currencies , changes in access to petroleum product pipelines and terminals , speculation in the energy futures markets , changes in aircraft fuel production capacity , environmental concerns and other unpredictable events may result in fuel supply shortages , additional fuel price volatility and cost increases in the future . see part i , item 1a . risk factors 2013 201cour business is dependent on the price and availability of aircraft fuel . continued periods of high volatility in fuel costs , increased fuel prices and significant disruptions in the supply of aircraft fuel could have a significant negative impact on our operating results and liquidity . 201d insurance we maintain insurance of the types that we believe are customary in the airline industry , including insurance for public liability , passenger liability , property damage , and all-risk coverage for damage to our aircraft . principal coverage includes liability for injury to members of the public , including passengers , damage to .\nQuestion: what was the total mainline operating expenses for 2015?\nAnswer: 28824.07407\nQuestion: and for 2014?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "31903.61446" } ]
CONVFINQA8807	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe company has elected the fair-value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings . the election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications . these positions are reported in short-term borrowings and long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the majority of these non-structured liabilities are a result of the company 2019s election of the fair-value option for liabilities associated with the citi-advised structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) , which were consolidated during the fourth quarter of 2007 . the change in fair values of the sivs 2019 liabilities reported in earnings was $ 2.6 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . for these non-structured liabilities the aggregate fair value is $ 263 million lower than the aggregate unpaid principal balance as of december 31 , 2008 . for all other non-structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 97 million as of december 31 , 2008 while the aggregate fair value exceeded the aggregate unpaid principal by $ 112 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the change in fair value of these non-structured liabilities reported a gain of $ 1.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain mortgage loans citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for- sale . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the fair-value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment , as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments . this election was effective for applicable instruments originated or purchased on or after september 1 , 2007 . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans carried at fair value : in millions of dollars december 31 , december 31 , carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 4273 $ 6392 aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance $ 138 $ 136 balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 9 $ 17 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 2 $ 2014 the changes in fair values of these mortgage loans is reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . the changes in fair value during the year ended december 31 , 2008 due to instrument- specific credit risk resulted in a $ 32 million loss . the change in fair value during 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk was immaterial . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . items selected for fair-value accounting in accordance with sfas 155 and sfas 156 certain hybrid financial instruments the company has elected to apply fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for certain hybrid financial assets and liabilities whose performance is linked to risks other than interest rate , foreign exchange or inflation ( e.g. , equity , credit or commodity risks ) . in addition , the company has elected fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for residual interests retained from securitizing certain financial assets . the company has elected fair-value accounting for these instruments because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis . in addition , the accounting for these instruments is simplified under a fair-value approach as it eliminates the complicated operational requirements of bifurcating the embedded derivatives from the host contracts and accounting for each separately . the hybrid financial instruments are classified as trading account assets , loans , deposits , trading account liabilities ( for prepaid derivatives ) , short-term borrowings or long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form , while residual interests in certain securitizations are classified as trading account assets . for hybrid financial instruments for which fair-value accounting has been elected under sfas 155 and that are classified as long-term debt , the aggregate unpaid principal exceeds the aggregate fair value by $ 1.9 billion as of december 31 , 2008 , while the aggregate fair value exceeds the aggregate unpaid principal balance by $ 460 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the difference for those instruments classified as loans is immaterial . changes in fair value for hybrid financial instruments , which in most cases includes a component for accrued interest , are recorded in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . interest accruals for certain hybrid instruments classified as trading assets are recorded separately from the change in fair value as interest revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . mortgage servicing rights the company accounts for mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value in accordance with sfas 156 . fair value for msrs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach . this approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates . the model assumptions used in the valuation of msrs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates . the fair value of msrs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates . in managing this risk , the company hedges a significant portion of the values of its msrs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts , forward- purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities , and purchased securities classified as trading . see note 23 on page 175 for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of msrs . these msrs , which totaled $ 5.7 billion and $ 8.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are classified as mortgage servicing rights on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of msrs are recorded in commissions and fees in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>december 31 2008</td><td>december 31 2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet</td><td>$ 4273</td><td>$ 6392</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 136</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>$ 9</td><td>$ 17</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days pastdue</td><td>$ 2</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr></table> the company has elected the fair-value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings . the election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications . these positions are reported in short-term borrowings and long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the majority of these non-structured liabilities are a result of the company 2019s election of the fair-value option for liabilities associated with the citi-advised structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) , which were consolidated during the fourth quarter of 2007 . the change in fair values of the sivs 2019 liabilities reported in earnings was $ 2.6 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . for these non-structured liabilities the aggregate fair value is $ 263 million lower than the aggregate unpaid principal balance as of december 31 , 2008 . for all other non-structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 97 million as of december 31 , 2008 while the aggregate fair value exceeded the aggregate unpaid principal by $ 112 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the change in fair value of these non-structured liabilities reported a gain of $ 1.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain mortgage loans citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for- sale . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the fair-value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment , as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments . this election was effective for applicable instruments originated or purchased on or after september 1 , 2007 . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans carried at fair value : in millions of dollars december 31 , december 31 , carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 4273 $ 6392 aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance $ 138 $ 136 balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 9 $ 17 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 2 $ 2014 the changes in fair values of these mortgage loans is reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . the changes in fair value during the year ended december 31 , 2008 due to instrument- specific credit risk resulted in a $ 32 million loss . the change in fair value during 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk was immaterial . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . items selected for fair-value accounting in accordance with sfas 155 and sfas 156 certain hybrid financial instruments the company has elected to apply fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for certain hybrid financial assets and liabilities whose performance is linked to risks other than interest rate , foreign exchange or inflation ( e.g. , equity , credit or commodity risks ) . in addition , the company has elected fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for residual interests retained from securitizing certain financial assets . the company has elected fair-value accounting for these instruments because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis . in addition , the accounting for these instruments is simplified under a fair-value approach as it eliminates the complicated operational requirements of bifurcating the embedded derivatives from the host contracts and accounting for each separately . the hybrid financial instruments are classified as trading account assets , loans , deposits , trading account liabilities ( for prepaid derivatives ) , short-term borrowings or long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form , while residual interests in certain securitizations are classified as trading account assets . for hybrid financial instruments for which fair-value accounting has been elected under sfas 155 and that are classified as long-term debt , the aggregate unpaid principal exceeds the aggregate fair value by $ 1.9 billion as of december 31 , 2008 , while the aggregate fair value exceeds the aggregate unpaid principal balance by $ 460 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the difference for those instruments classified as loans is immaterial . changes in fair value for hybrid financial instruments , which in most cases includes a component for accrued interest , are recorded in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . interest accruals for certain hybrid instruments classified as trading assets are recorded separately from the change in fair value as interest revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . mortgage servicing rights the company accounts for mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value in accordance with sfas 156 . fair value for msrs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach . this approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates . the model assumptions used in the valuation of msrs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates . the fair value of msrs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates . in managing this risk , the company hedges a significant portion of the values of its msrs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts , forward- purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities , and purchased securities classified as trading . see note 23 on page 175 for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of msrs . these msrs , which totaled $ 5.7 billion and $ 8.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are classified as mortgage servicing rights on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of msrs are recorded in commissions and fees in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income. .\nQuestion: what the balance of carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet in 2008?\nAnswer: 4273.0\nQuestion: what about in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "6392.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3964	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndecember 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , included ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gain on disposition adjustment or impairment of acquired assets and obligations</td><td>$ -9.0 ( 9.0 )</td><td>$ -1.2 ( 1.2 )</td><td>$ -19.2 ( 19.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>consulting and professional fees</td><td>10.1</td><td>1.0</td><td>8.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>employee severance and retention</td><td>1.9</td><td>1.6</td><td>3.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>information technology integration</td><td>0.9</td><td>2.6</td><td>3.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>in-process research & development</td><td>38.5</td><td>6.5</td><td>2.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>integration personnel</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2.5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>facility and employee relocation</td><td>7.5</td><td>2013</td><td>1.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>distributor acquisitions</td><td>7.3</td><td>4.1</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>sales agent and lease contract terminations</td><td>8.1</td><td>5.4</td><td>0.2</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other</td><td>3.2</td><td>5.2</td><td>3.6</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>acquisition integration and other</td><td>$ 68.5</td><td>$ 25.2</td><td>$ 6.1</td></tr></table> included in the gain on disposition , adjustment or impairment of acquired assets and obligations for 2008 is a favorable adjustment to certain liabilities of acquired companies due to changes in circumstances surrounding those liabilities subsequent to the related measurement period . included in the gain on disposition , adjustment or impairment of acquired assets and obligations for 2006 is the sale of the former centerpulse austin land and facilities for a gain of $ 5.1 million and the favorable settlement of two pre- acquisition contingent liabilities . these gains were offset by a $ 13.4 million impairment charge for certain centerpulse tradename and trademark intangibles based principally in our europe operating segment . in-process research and development charges for 2008 are related to the acquisition of abbott spine . in-process research and development charges for 2007 are related to the acquisitions of endius and orthosoft . consulting and professional fees relate to third- party integration consulting performed in a variety of areas such as tax , compliance , logistics and human resources and legal fees related to matters involving acquired businesses . cash and equivalents 2013 we consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents . the carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and equivalents are valued at cost , which approximates their fair value . restricted cash is primarily composed of cash held in escrow related to certain insurance coverage . inventories 2013 inventories , net of allowances for obsolete and slow-moving goods , are stated at the lower of cost or market , with cost determined on a first-in first-out basis . property , plant and equipment 2013 property , plant and equipment is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation . depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives of ten to forty years for buildings and improvements , three to eight years for machinery and equipment . maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred . in accordance with statement of financial accounting standards ( 201csfas 201d ) no . 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets , 201d we review property , plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable . an impairment loss would be recognized when estimated future undiscounted cash flows relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount . an impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its fair value . software costs 2013 we capitalize certain computer software and software development costs incurred in connection with developing or obtaining computer software for internal use when both the preliminary project stage is completed and it is probable that the software will be used as intended . capitalized software costs generally include external direct costs of materials and services utilized in developing or obtaining computer software and compensation and related benefits for employees who are directly associated with the software project . capitalized software costs are included in property , plant and equipment on our balance sheet and amortized on a straight-line basis when the software is ready for its intended use over the estimated useful lives of the software , which approximate three to seven years . instruments 2013 instruments are hand-held devices used by orthopaedic surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical procedures . instruments are recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , plant and equipment . undeployed instruments are carried at cost , net of allowances for excess and obsolete instruments . instruments in the field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation . depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on average estimated useful lives , determined principally in reference to associated product life cycles , primarily five years . we review instruments for impairment in accordance with sfas no . 144 . depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general and administrative expense . goodwill 2013 we account for goodwill in accordance with sfas no . 142 , 201cgoodwill and other intangible assets . 201d goodwill is not amortized but is subject to annual impairment tests . goodwill has been assigned to reporting units . we perform annual impairment tests by comparing each reporting unit 2019s fair value to its carrying amount to determine if there is potential impairment . the fair value of the reporting unit and the implied fair value of goodwill are determined based upon a discounted cash flow analysis . significant assumptions are incorporated into to these discounted cash flow analyses such as estimated growth rates and risk-adjusted discount rates . we perform this test in the fourth quarter of the year . if the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value , an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill is less than the carrying value of the reporting unit goodwill . intangible assets 2013 we account for intangible assets in accordance with sfas no . 142 . intangible assets are initially measured at their fair value . we have determined the fair value of our intangible assets either by the fair value of the z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 8 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg* transmitting job : c48761 pcn : 044000000 *%%pcmsg\|44 \|00007\|yes\|no\|02/24/2009 06:10\|0\|0\|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d\| .\nQuestion: what was the level of information technology integration in 2006?\nAnswer: 3.0\nQuestion: and in 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2.6" } ]
CONVFINQA8454	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npipeline transportation 2013 we own a system of pipelines through marathon pipe line llc ( 201cmpl 201d ) and ohio river pipe line llc ( 201corpl 201d ) , our wholly-owned subsidiaries . our pipeline systems transport crude oil and refined products primarily in the midwest and gulf coast regions to our refineries , our terminals and other pipeline systems . our mpl and orpl wholly-owned and undivided interest common carrier systems consist of 1737 miles of crude oil lines and 1825 miles of refined product lines comprising 32 systems located in 11 states . the mpl common carrier pipeline network is one of the largest petroleum pipeline systems in the united states , based on total barrels delivered . our common carrier pipeline systems are subject to state and federal energy regulatory commission regulations and guidelines , including published tariffs for the transportation of crude oil and refined products . third parties generated 13 percent of the crude oil and refined product shipments on our mpl and orpl common carrier pipelines in 2009 . our mpl and orpl common carrier pipelines transported the volumes shown in the following table for each of the last three years . pipeline barrels handled ( thousands of barrels per day ) 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( thousands of barrels per day )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>crude oil trunk lines</td><td>1279</td><td>1405</td><td>1451</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>refined products trunk lines</td><td>953</td><td>960</td><td>1049</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>2232</td><td>2365</td><td>2500</td></tr></table> we also own 196 miles of private crude oil pipelines and 850 miles of private refined products pipelines , and we lease 217 miles of common carrier refined product pipelines . we have partial ownership interests in several pipeline companies that have approximately 780 miles of crude oil pipelines and 3600 miles of refined products pipelines , including about 970 miles operated by mpl . in addition , mpl operates most of our private pipelines and 985 miles of crude oil and 160 miles of natural gas pipelines owned by our e&p segment . our major refined product pipelines include the owned and operated cardinal products pipeline and the wabash pipeline . the cardinal products pipeline delivers refined products from kenova , west virginia , to columbus , ohio . the wabash pipeline system delivers product from robinson , illinois , to various terminals in the area of chicago , illinois . other significant refined product pipelines owned and operated by mpl extend from : robinson , illinois , to louisville , kentucky ; garyville , louisiana , to zachary , louisiana ; and texas city , texas , to pasadena , texas . in addition , as of december 31 , 2009 , we had interests in the following refined product pipelines : 2022 65 percent undivided ownership interest in the louisville-lexington system , a petroleum products pipeline system extending from louisville to lexington , kentucky ; 2022 60 percent interest in muskegon pipeline llc , which owns a refined products pipeline extending from griffith , indiana , to north muskegon , michigan ; 2022 50 percent interest in centennial pipeline llc , which owns a refined products system connecting the gulf coast region with the midwest market ; 2022 17 percent interest in explorer pipeline company , a refined products pipeline system extending from the gulf coast to the midwest ; and 2022 6 percent interest in wolverine pipe line company , a refined products pipeline system extending from chicago , illinois , to toledo , ohio . our major owned and operated crude oil lines run from : patoka , illinois , to catlettsburg , kentucky ; patoka , illinois , to robinson , illinois ; patoka , illinois , to lima , ohio ; lima , ohio to canton , ohio ; samaria , michigan , to detroit , michigan ; and st . james , louisiana , to garyville , louisiana . as of december 31 , 2009 , we had interests in the following crude oil pipelines : 2022 51 percent interest in loop llc , the owner and operator of loop , which is the only u.s . deepwater oil port , located 18 miles off the coast of louisiana , and a crude oil pipeline connecting the port facility to storage caverns and tanks at clovelly , louisiana ; 2022 59 percent interest in locap llc , which owns a crude oil pipeline connecting loop and the capline system; .\nQuestion: what is the value of crude oil trunk lines handled in 2009?\nAnswer: 1279.0\nQuestion: what about the total pipeline barrels?\nAnswer: 2232.0\nQuestion: what portion does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.57303" } ]
CONVFINQA10191	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nperformance graph the following graph shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index from april 24 , 2009 through april 25 , 2014 . the past performance of our common stock is not indicative of the future performance of our common stock . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among netapp , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>4/09</td><td>4/10</td><td>4/11</td><td>4/12</td><td>4/13</td><td>4/14</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>netapp inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 189.45</td><td>$ 284.75</td><td>$ 212.19</td><td>$ 190.66</td><td>$ 197.58</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>144.63</td><td>170.44</td><td>182.57</td><td>202.25</td><td>253.22</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>138.84</td><td>162.75</td><td>170.49</td><td>199.29</td><td>240.02</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>143.49</td><td>162.37</td><td>186.06</td><td>189.18</td><td>236.12</td></tr></table> we believe that a number of factors may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly . see 201citem 1a . risk factors . 201d sale of unregistered securities .\nQuestion: what is the value of netapp inc on 4/14 less 100?\nAnswer: 97.58\nQuestion: what is that value divided by 100?\nAnswer: 0.9758\nQuestion: what was the price of the s&p information technology on 4/14?\nAnswer: 236.12\nQuestion: what is that number less 100?\nAnswer: 136.12\nQuestion: what is that divided by 100?\nAnswer: 1.3612\nQuestion: what is the difference between the netapp and s&p ratios?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-38.54" } ]
CONVFINQA2389	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nintel corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 16 : other comprehensive income ( loss ) the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) by component and related tax effects for each period were as follows : ( in millions ) unrealized holding ( losses ) on available- for-sale investments deferred tax asset valuation allowance unrealized holding ( losses ) on derivatives service credits ( costs ) actuarial ( losses ) foreign currency translation adjustment total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on available-for-sale investments</td><td>deferred tax asset valuation allowance</td><td>unrealized holding gains ( losses ) on derivatives</td><td>prior service credits ( costs )</td><td>actuarial gains ( losses )</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 27 2014</td><td>$ 2459</td><td>$ 26</td><td>$ -423 ( 423 )</td><td>$ -47 ( 47 )</td><td>$ -1004 ( 1004 )</td><td>$ -345 ( 345 )</td><td>$ 666</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other comprehensive income ( loss ) before reclassifications</td><td>-999 ( 999 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-298 ( 298 )</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>73</td><td>-187 ( 187 )</td><td>-1413 ( 1413 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss )</td><td>-93 ( 93 )</td><td>2014</td><td>522</td><td>10</td><td>67</td><td>2014</td><td>506</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>tax effects</td><td>382</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td><td>-67 ( 67 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-12 ( 12 )</td><td>17</td><td>301</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other comprehensive income ( loss )</td><td>-710 ( 710 )</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td><td>157</td><td>7</td><td>128</td><td>-170 ( 170 )</td><td>-606 ( 606 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 26 2015</td><td>1749</td><td>8</td><td>-266 ( 266 )</td><td>-40 ( 40 )</td><td>-876 ( 876 )</td><td>-515 ( 515 )</td><td>60</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other comprehensive income ( loss ) before reclassifications</td><td>1170</td><td>2014</td><td>-26 ( 26 )</td><td>2014</td><td>-680 ( 680 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>460</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss )</td><td>-530 ( 530 )</td><td>2014</td><td>38</td><td>2014</td><td>170</td><td>2014</td><td>-322 ( 322 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>tax effects</td><td>-225 ( 225 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-5 ( 5 )</td><td>2014</td><td>146</td><td>2014</td><td>-92 ( 92 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>other comprehensive income ( loss )</td><td>415</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>7</td><td>2014</td><td>-364 ( 364 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>46</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>december 31 2016</td><td>$ 2164</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -259 ( 259 )</td><td>$ -40 ( 40 )</td><td>$ -1240 ( 1240 )</td><td>$ -519 ( 519 )</td><td>$ 106</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the net change in the accumulated other comprehensive income during 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-606.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8187	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( a ) excludes discontinued operations . ( b ) earnings before interest expense and taxes as a percent of average total assets . ( c ) total debt as a percent of the sum of total debt , shareholders 2019 equity and non-current deferred income tax liabilities . the results above include the impact of the specified items detailed below . additional discussion regarding the specified items in fiscal years 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are provided in item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars except per share amounts</td><td>years ended september 30 2017</td><td>years ended september 30 2016</td><td>years ended september 30 2015</td><td>years ended september 30 2014</td><td>years ended september 30 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total specified items</td><td>$ 1466</td><td>$ 1261</td><td>$ 1186</td><td>$ 153</td><td>$ 442</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>after-tax impact of specified items</td><td>$ 971</td><td>$ 892</td><td>$ 786</td><td>$ 101</td><td>$ 279</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>impact of specified items on diluted earnings per share</td><td>$ -4.34 ( 4.34 )</td><td>$ -4.10 ( 4.10 )</td><td>$ -3.79 ( 3.79 )</td><td>$ -0.51 ( 0.51 )</td><td>$ -1.40 ( 1.40 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>impact of dilution from share issuances</td><td>$ -0.54 ( 0.54 )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ -0.02 ( 0.02 )</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr></table> item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations the following commentary should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes . within the tables presented throughout this discussion , certain columns may not add due to the use of rounded numbers for disclosure purposes . percentages and earnings per share amounts presented are calculated from the underlying amounts . references to years throughout this discussion relate to our fiscal years , which end on september 30 . company overview description of the company and business segments becton , dickinson and company ( 201cbd 201d ) is a global medical technology company engaged in the development , manufacture and sale of a broad range of medical supplies , devices , laboratory equipment and diagnostic products used by healthcare institutions , life science researchers , clinical laboratories , the pharmaceutical industry and the general public . the company's organizational structure is based upon two principal business segments , bd medical ( 201cmedical 201d ) and bd life sciences ( 201clife sciences 201d ) . bd 2019s products are manufactured and sold worldwide . our products are marketed in the united states and internationally through independent distribution channels and directly to end-users by bd and independent sales representatives . we organize our operations outside the united states as follows : europe ; ema ( which includes the commonwealth of independent states , the middle east and africa ) ; greater asia ( which includes japan and asia pacific ) ; latin america ( which includes mexico , central america , the caribbean , and south america ) ; and canada . we continue to pursue growth opportunities in emerging markets , which include the following geographic regions : eastern europe , the middle east , africa , latin america and certain countries within asia pacific . we are primarily focused on certain countries whose healthcare systems are expanding , in particular , china and india . strategic objectives bd remains focused on delivering sustainable growth and shareholder value , while making appropriate investments for the future . bd management operates the business consistent with the following core strategies : 2022 to increase revenue growth by focusing on our core products , services and solutions that deliver greater benefits to patients , healthcare workers and researchers; .\nQuestion: what was the value of total specified items as of 9/30/17?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1466.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3458	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhigher average borrowings . additionally , the recapitalization that occurred late in the first quarter of 2005 resulted in a full year of interest in 2006 as compared to approximately ten months in 2005 . the increase in interest expense in 2005 as compared to 2004 also resulted from the recapitalization in 2005 . income tax expense income tax expense totaled $ 150.2 million , $ 116.1 million and $ 118.3 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . this resulted in an effective tax rate of 37.2% ( 37.2 % ) , 37.2% ( 37.2 % ) and 37.6% ( 37.6 % ) for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . net earnings net earnings totaled $ 259.1 million , $ 196.6 and $ 189.4 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , or $ 1.37 , $ 1.53 and $ 1.48 per diluted share , respectively . segment results of operations transaction processing services ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>processing and services revenues</td><td>$ 2458777</td><td>$ 1208430</td><td>$ 892033</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of revenues</td><td>1914148</td><td>904124</td><td>667078</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross profit</td><td>544629</td><td>304306</td><td>224955</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>selling general and administrative expenses</td><td>171106</td><td>94889</td><td>99581</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>research and development costs</td><td>70879</td><td>85702</td><td>54038</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>operating income</td><td>$ 302644</td><td>$ 123715</td><td>$ 71336</td></tr></table> revenues for the transaction processing services segment are derived from three main revenue channels ; enterprise solutions , integrated financial solutions and international . revenues from transaction processing services totaled $ 2458.8 million , $ 1208.4 and $ 892.0 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the overall segment increase of $ 1250.4 million during 2006 , as compared to 2005 was primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 1067.2 million to the overall increase . the majority of the remaining 2006 growth is attributable to organic growth within the historically owned integrated financial solutions and international revenue channels , with international including $ 31.9 million related to the newly formed business process outsourcing operation in brazil . the overall segment increase of $ 316.4 in 2005 as compared to 2004 results from the inclusion of a full year of results for the 2004 acquisitions of aurum , sanchez , kordoba , and intercept , which contributed $ 301.1 million of the increase . cost of revenues for the transaction processing services segment totaled $ 1914.1 million , $ 904.1 million and $ 667.1 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the overall segment increase of $ 1010.0 million during 2006 as compared to 2005 was primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 848.2 million to the increase . gross profit as a percentage of revenues ( 201cgross margin 201d ) was 22.2% ( 22.2 % ) , 25.2% ( 25.2 % ) and 25.2% ( 25.2 % ) for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the decrease in gross profit in 2006 as compared to 2005 is primarily due to the february 1 , 2006 certegy merger , which businesses typically have lower margins than those of the historically owned fis businesses . incremental intangible asset amortization relating to the certegy merger also contributed to the decrease in gross margin . included in cost of revenues was depreciation and amortization of $ 272.4 million , $ 139.8 million , and $ 94.6 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . selling , general and administrative expenses totaled $ 171.1 million , $ 94.9 million and $ 99.6 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the increase in 2006 compared to 2005 is primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 73.7 million to the overall increase of $ 76.2 million . the decrease of $ 4.7 million in 2005 as compared to 2004 is primarily attributable to the effect of acquisition related costs in 2004 . included in selling , general and administrative expenses was depreciation and amortization of $ 11.0 million , $ 9.1 million and $ 2.3 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the total of net earnings in 2006, in thousands?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "259100.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7422	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ngoodwill is reviewed annually during the fourth quarter for impairment . in addition , the company performs an impairment analysis of other intangible assets based on the occurrence of other factors . such factors include , but are not limited to , signifi- cant changes in membership , state funding , medical contracts and provider networks and contracts . an impairment loss is rec- ognized if the carrying value of intangible assets exceeds the implied fair value . the company did not recognize any impair- ment losses for the periods presented . medical claims liabilities medical services costs include claims paid , claims reported but not yet paid ( inventory ) , estimates for claims incurred but not yet received ( ibnr ) and estimates for the costs necessary to process unpaid claims . the estimates of medical claims liabilities are developed using standard actuarial methods based upon historical data for payment patterns , cost trends , product mix , seasonality , utiliza- tion of healthcare services and other relevant factors including product changes . these estimates are continually reviewed and adjustments , if necessary , are reflected in the period known . management did not change actuarial methods during the years presented . management believes the amount of medical claims payable is reasonable and adequate to cover the company 2019s liabil- ity for unpaid claims as of december 31 , 2005 ; however , actual claim payments may differ from established estimates . revenue recognition the majority of the company 2019s medicaid managed care premi- um revenue is received monthly based on fixed rates per member as determined by state contracts . some contracts allow for addi- tional premium related to certain supplemental services provided such as maternity deliveries . revenue is recognized as earned over the covered period of services . revenues are recorded based on membership and eligibility data provided by the states , which may be adjusted by the states for updates to this membership and eligibility data . these adjustments are immaterial in relation to total revenue recorded and are reflected in the period known . premiums collected in advance are recorded as unearned revenue . the specialty services segment generates revenue under con- tracts with state and local government entities , our health plans and third-party customers . revenues for services are recognized when the services are provided or as ratably earned over the cov- ered period of services . for performance-based contracts , the company does not recognize revenue subject to refund until data is sufficient to measure performance . such amounts are recorded as unearned revenue . revenues due to the company are recorded as premium and related receivables and recorded net of an allowance for uncol- lectible accounts based on historical trends and management 2019s judgment on the collectibility of these accounts . activity in the allowance for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31 is summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>allowances beginning of year</td><td>$ 462</td><td>$ 607</td><td>$ 219</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amounts charged to expense</td><td>80</td><td>407</td><td>472</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>write-offs of uncollectible receivables</td><td>-199 ( 199 )</td><td>-552 ( 552 )</td><td>-84 ( 84 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>allowances end of year</td><td>$ 343</td><td>$ 462</td><td>$ 607</td></tr></table> significant customers centene receives the majority of its revenues under contracts or subcontracts with state medicaid managed care programs . the contracts , which expire on various dates between june 30 , 2006 and august 31 , 2008 , are expected to be renewed . contracts with the states of indiana , kansas , texas and wisconsin each accounted for 18% ( 18 % ) , 12% ( 12 % ) , 22% ( 22 % ) and 23% ( 23 % ) , respectively , of the company 2019s revenues for the year ended december 31 , 2005 . reinsurance centene has purchased reinsurance from third parties to cover eligible healthcare services . the current reinsurance program covers 90% ( 90 % ) of inpatient healthcare expenses in excess of annual deductibles of $ 300 per member , up to a lifetime maximum of $ 2000 . centene 2019s medicaid managed care subsidiaries are respon- sible for inpatient charges in excess of an average daily per diem . reinsurance recoveries were $ 4014 , $ 3730 , and $ 5345 , in 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 , respectively . reinsurance expenses were approximately $ 4105 , $ 6724 , and $ 6185 in 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 , respectively . reinsurance recoveries , net of expenses , are included in medical costs . other income ( expense ) other income ( expense ) consists principally of investment income and interest expense . investment income is derived from the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents , restricted deposits and investments . interest expense relates to borrowings under our credit facility , mortgage interest , interest on capital leases and credit facility fees . income taxes deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases . deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled . the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date of the tax rate change . valuation allowances are provided when it is considered more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be realized . in determining if a deductible temporary difference or net operating loss can be realized , the company considers future reversals of .\nQuestion: what was the difference in end of year allowances between 2003 and 2004?\nAnswer: -145.0\nQuestion: so what was the percentage change during this time?\nAnswer: -0.23888\nQuestion: what was the change in the balance of the allowance for uncollectible accounts between the beginning and end of 2005?\nAnswer: -119.0\nQuestion: and the percentage change of this value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.25758" } ]
CONVFINQA6867	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmarathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements restricted stock awards the following is a summary of restricted stock award activity . awards weighted-average grant date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>awards</td><td>weighted-averagegrant datefair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unvested at december 31 2008</td><td>2049255</td><td>$ 47.72</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>251335</td><td>24.74</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-762466 ( 762466 )</td><td>46.03</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-96625 ( 96625 )</td><td>43.56</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>unvested at december 31 2009</td><td>1441499</td><td>44.89</td></tr></table> the vesting date fair value of restricted stock awards which vested during 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 24 million , $ 38 million and $ 29 million . the weighted average grant date fair value of restricted stock awards was $ 44.89 , $ 47.72 , and $ 39.87 for awards unvested at december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . as of december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 43 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock awards which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years . stock-based performance awards all stock-based performance awards have either vested or been forfeited . the vesting date fair value of stock- based performance awards which vested during 2007 was $ 38 . 24 . stockholders 2019 equity in each year , 2009 and 2008 , we issued 2 million in common stock upon the redemption of the exchangeable shares described below in addition to treasury shares issued for employee stock-based awards . the board of directors has authorized the repurchase of up to $ 5 billion of marathon common stock . purchases under the program may be in either open market transactions , including block purchases , or in privately negotiated transactions . we will use cash on hand , cash generated from operations , proceeds from potential asset sales or cash from available borrowings to acquire shares . this program may be changed based upon our financial condition or changes in market conditions and is subject to termination prior to completion . the repurchase program does not include specific price targets or timetables . as of december 31 , 2009 , we have acquired 66 million common shares at a cost of $ 2922 million under the program . no shares have been acquired since august 2008 . securities exchangeable into marathon common stock 2013 as discussed in note 6 , we acquired all of the outstanding shares of western on october 18 , 2007 . the western shareholders who were canadian residents received , at their election , cash , marathon common stock , securities exchangeable into marathon common stock ( the 201cexchangeable shares 201d ) or a combination thereof . the western shareholders elected to receive 5 million exchangeable shares as part of the acquisition consideration . the exchangeable shares are shares of an indirect canadian subsidiary of marathon and , at the acquisition date , were exchangeable on a one-for-one basis into marathon common stock . subsequent to the acquisition , the exchange ratio is adjusted to reflect cash dividends , if any , paid on marathon common stock and cash dividends , if any , paid on the exchangeable shares . the exchange ratio at december 31 , 2009 , was 1.06109 common shares for each exchangeable share . the exchangeable shares are exchangeable at the option of the holder at any time and are automatically redeemable on october 18 , 2011 . holders of exchangeable shares are entitled to instruct a trustee to vote ( or obtain a proxy from the trustee to vote directly ) on all matters submitted to the holders of marathon common stock . the number of votes to which each holder is entitled is equal to the whole number of shares of marathon common stock into which such holder 2019s exchangeable shares would be exchangeable based on the exchange ratio in effect on the record date for the vote . the voting right is attached to voting preferred shares of marathon that were issued to a trustee in an amount .\nQuestion: what was the vesting date fair value of restricted stock awards which vested in 2009?\nAnswer: 24.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2008?\nAnswer: 38.0\nQuestion: in which year, then, was it greater?\nAnswer: no\nQuestion: and in that same year of 2009, what was the number of unvested shares?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1441499.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7070	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfoodservice sales volumes increased in 2012 compared with 2011 . average sales margins were higher reflecting the realization of sales price increases for the pass-through of earlier cost increases . raw material costs for board and resins were lower . operating costs and distribution costs were both higher . the u.s . shorewood business was sold december 31 , 2011 and the non-u.s . business was sold in january looking ahead to the first quarter of 2013 , coated paperboard sales volumes are expected to increase slightly from the fourth quarter of 2012 . average sales price realizations are expected to be slightly lower , but margins should benefit from a more favorable product mix . input costs are expected to be higher for energy and wood . no planned main- tenance outages are scheduled in the first quarter . in january 2013 the company announced the perma- nent shutdown of a coated paperboard machine at the augusta mill with an annual capacity of 140000 tons . foodservice sales volumes are expected to increase . average sales margins are expected to decrease due to the realization of sales price decreases effective with our january contract open- ers . input costs for board and resin are expected to be lower and operating costs are also expected to decrease . european consumer packaging net sales in 2012 were $ 380 million compared with $ 375 million in 2011 and $ 345 million in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 99 million compared with $ 93 million in 2011 and $ 76 million in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 increased from 2011 . average sales price realizations were higher in russian markets , but were lower in european markets . input costs decreased , primarily for wood , and planned maintenance downtime costs were lower in 2012 than in 2011 . looking forward to the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to decrease in both europe and russia . average sales price realizations are expected to be higher in russia , but be more than offset by decreases in europe . input costs are expected to increase for wood and chemicals . no maintenance outages are scheduled for the first quarter . asian consumer packaging net sales were $ 830 million in 2012 compared with $ 855 million in 2011 and $ 705 million in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 4 million compared with $ 35 million in 2011 and $ 34 million in 2010 . sales volumes increased in 2012 compared with 2011 partially due to the start-up of a new coated paperboard machine . average sales price realizations were significantly lower , but were partially offset by lower input costs for purchased pulp . start-up costs for a new coated paperboard machine adversely impacted operating profits in 2012 . in the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly . average sales price realizations for folding carton board and bristols board are expected to be lower reflecting increased competitive pressures and seasonally weaker market demand . input costs should be higher for pulp and chemicals . however , costs related to the ramp-up of the new coated paperboard machine should be lower . distribution xpedx , our distribution business , is one of north america 2019s leading business-to-business distributors to manufacturers , facility managers and printers , providing customized solutions that are designed to improve efficiency , reduce costs and deliver results . customer demand is generally sensitive to changes in economic conditions and consumer behavior , along with segment specific activity including corpo- rate advertising and promotional spending , government spending and domestic manufacturing activity . distribution 2019s margins are relatively stable across an economic cycle . providing customers with the best choice for value in both products and supply chain services is a key competitive factor . addition- ally , efficient customer service , cost-effective logis- tics and focused working capital management are key factors in this segment 2019s profitability . distribution . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 6040</td><td>$ 6630</td><td>$ 6735</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>22</td><td>34</td><td>78</td></tr></table> distr ibut ion 2019s 2012 annual sales decreased 9% ( 9 % ) from 2011 , and decreased 10% ( 10 % ) from 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 22 million ( $ 71 million exclud- ing reorganization costs ) compared with $ 34 million ( $ 86 million excluding reorganization costs ) in 2011 and $ 78 million in 2010 . annual sales of printing papers and graphic arts supplies and equipment totaled $ 3.5 billion in 2012 compared with $ 4.0 billion in 2011 and $ 4.2 billion in 2010 , reflecting declining demand and the exiting of unprofitable businesses . trade margins as a percent of sales for printing papers were relatively even with both 2011 and 2010 . revenue from packaging prod- ucts was flat at $ 1.6 billion in both 2012 and 2011 and up slightly compared to $ 1.5 billion in 2010 . pack- aging margins increased in 2012 from both 2011 and 2010 , reflecting the successful execution of strategic sourcing initiatives . facility supplies annual revenue was $ 0.9 billion in 2012 , down compared to $ 1.0 bil- lion in 2011 and 2010 . operating profits in 2012 included $ 49 million of reorganization costs for severance , professional services and asset write-downs compared with $ 52 .\nQuestion: what are the total annual sales of printing papers and graphic arts supplies and equipment in 2012, in millions?\nAnswer: 3500.0\nQuestion: what is the sales generated via distribution channel in 2012?\nAnswer: 6040.0\nQuestion: what portion of total sales is via distribution?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.57947" } ]
CONVFINQA1625	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( a ) the net change in the total valuation allowance for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 was an increase of $ 12 million and an increase of $ 26 million , respectively . deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet under the captions deferred charges and other assets and deferred income taxes . there was a decrease in deferred income tax assets principally relating to the utilization of u.s . federal alternative minimum tax credits as permitted under tax reform . deferred tax liabilities increased primarily due to the tax deferral of the book gain recognized on the transfer of the north american consumer packaging business to a subsidiary of graphic packaging holding company . of the $ 1.5 billion of deferred tax liabilities for forestlands , related installment sales , and investment in subsidiary , $ 884 million is attributable to an investment in subsidiary and relates to a 2006 international paper installment sale of forestlands and $ 538 million is attributable to a 2007 temple-inland installment sale of forestlands ( see note 14 ) . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ -188 ( 188 )</td><td>$ -98 ( 98 )</td><td>$ -150 ( 150 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>( additions ) reductions based on tax positions related to current year</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>-54 ( 54 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>( additions ) for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-37 ( 37 )</td><td>-40 ( 40 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>5</td><td>4</td><td>33</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>2</td><td>6</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expiration of statutes oflimitations</td><td>2</td><td>1</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>currency translation adjustment</td><td>3</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ -220 ( 220 )</td><td>$ -188 ( 188 )</td><td>$ -98 ( 98 )</td></tr></table> if the company were to prevail on the unrecognized tax benefits recorded , substantially all of the balances at december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 would benefit the effective tax rate . the company accrues interest on unrecognized tax benefits as a component of interest expense . penalties , if incurred , are recognized as a component of income tax expense . the company had approximately $ 21 million and $ 17 million accrued for the payment of estimated interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . the major jurisdictions where the company files income tax returns are the united states , brazil , france , poland and russia . generally , tax years 2006 through 2017 remain open and subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities . the company frequently faces challenges regarding the amount of taxes due . these challenges include positions taken by the company related to the timing , nature , and amount of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions . pending audit settlements and the expiration of statute of limitations could reduce the uncertain tax positions by $ 30 million during the next twelve months . the brazilian federal revenue service has challenged the deductibility of goodwill amortization generated in a 2007 acquisition by international paper do brasil ltda. , a wholly-owned subsidiary of the company . the company received assessments for the tax years 2007-2015 totaling approximately $ 150 million in tax , and $ 380 million in interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2018 ( adjusted for variation in currency exchange rates ) . after a previous favorable ruling challenging the basis for these assessments , we received an unfavorable decision in october 2018 from the brazilian administrative council of tax appeals . the company intends to further appeal the matter in the brazilian federal courts in 2019 ; however , this tax litigation matter may take many years to resolve . the company believes that it has appropriately evaluated the transaction underlying these assessments , and has concluded based on brazilian tax law , that its tax position would be sustained . the company intends to vigorously defend its position against the current assessments and any similar assessments that may be issued for tax years subsequent to 2015 . international paper uses the flow-through method to account for investment tax credits earned on eligible open-loop biomass facilities and combined heat and power system expenditures . under this method , the investment tax credits are recognized as a reduction to income tax expense in the year they are earned rather than a reduction in the asset basis . the company recorded a tax benefit of $ 6 million during 2018 and recorded a tax benefit of $ 68 million during 2017 related to investment tax credits earned in tax years 2013-2017. .\nQuestion: what is the change in unrecognized tax benefits from 2017 to 2018?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "32.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2423	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npage 71 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 16 . shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) on october 24 , 2007 , ball announced the discontinuance of the company 2019s discount on the reinvestment of dividends associated with the company 2019s dividend reinvestment and voluntary stock purchase plan for non- employee shareholders . the 5 percent discount was discontinued on november 1 , 2007 . accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>pension and other postretirement items net of tax</td><td>effective financial derivatives net of tax</td><td>accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2004</td><td>$ 148.9</td><td>$ -126.3 ( 126.3 )</td><td>$ 10.6</td><td>$ 33.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005 change</td><td>-74.3 ( 74.3 )</td><td>-43.6 ( 43.6 )</td><td>-16.0 ( 16.0 )</td><td>-133.9 ( 133.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2005</td><td>74.6</td><td>-169.9 ( 169.9 )</td><td>-5.4 ( 5.4 )</td><td>-100.7 ( 100.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2006 change</td><td>57.2</td><td>55.9</td><td>6.0</td><td>119.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>effect of sfas no . 158 adoption ( a )</td><td>2013</td><td>-47.9 ( 47.9 )</td><td>2013</td><td>-47.9 ( 47.9 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2006</td><td>131.8</td><td>-161.9 ( 161.9 )</td><td>0.6</td><td>-29.5 ( 29.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 change</td><td>90.0</td><td>57.9</td><td>-11.5 ( 11.5 )</td><td>136.4</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>december 31 2007</td><td>$ 221.8</td><td>$ -104.0 ( 104.0 )</td><td>$ -10.9 ( 10.9 )</td><td>$ 106.9</td></tr></table> ( a ) within the company 2019s 2006 annual report , the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included a transition adjustment of $ 47.9 million , net of tax , related to the adoption of sfas no . 158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) , 201d as a component of 2006 comprehensive earnings rather than only as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss . the 2006 amounts have been revised to correct the previous reporting . notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings . therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period . the change in the pension and other postretirement items is presented net of related tax expense of $ 31.3 million and $ 2.9 million for 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a related tax benefit of $ 27.3 million for 2005 . the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax benefit of $ 3.2 million for 2007 , related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 and related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 . stock-based compensation programs effective january 1 , 2006 , ball adopted sfas no . 123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare based payment , 201d which is a revision of sfas no . 123 and supersedes apb opinion no . 25 . the new standard establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services , including stock option and restricted stock grants . the major differences for ball are that ( 1 ) expense is now recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings for the fair value of new stock option grants and nonvested portions of grants made prior to january 1 , 2006 , and ( 2 ) the company 2019s deposit share program ( discussed below ) is no longer a variable plan that is marked to current market value each month through earnings . upon adoption of sfas no . 123 ( revised 2004 ) , ball has chosen to use the modified prospective transition method and the black-scholes valuation model. .\nQuestion: what was the change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) from 2005 to 2006?\nAnswer: 71.2\nQuestion: and what is the percentage this change represents of those losses in 2005?\nAnswer: 0.70705\nQuestion: and in that year of 2006, what was the related tax expense, in millions?\nAnswer: 5.7\nQuestion: what was it in 2007, also in millions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3.2" } ]
CONVFINQA8619	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 8 2013 debt our long-term debt consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes with rates from 2.13% ( 2.13 % ) to 6.15% ( 6.15 % ) due 2016 to 2042</td><td>$ 5642</td><td>$ 5308</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>notes with rates from 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) to 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) due 2013 to 2036</td><td>1080</td><td>1239</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other debt</td><td>478</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total long-term debt</td><td>7200</td><td>6966</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less : unamortized discounts</td><td>-892 ( 892 )</td><td>-506 ( 506 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total long-term debt net of unamortized discounts</td><td>6308</td><td>6460</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>less : current maturities of long-term debt</td><td>-150 ( 150 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total long-term debt net</td><td>$ 6158</td><td>$ 6460</td></tr></table> in december 2012 , we issued notes totaling $ 1.3 billion with a fixed interest rate of 4.07% ( 4.07 % ) maturing in december 2042 ( the new notes ) in exchange for outstanding notes totaling $ 1.2 billion with interest rates ranging from 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) to 8.50% ( 8.50 % ) maturing in 2023 to 2040 ( the old notes ) . in connection with the exchange , we paid a premium of $ 393 million , of which $ 225 million was paid in cash and $ 168 million was in the form of new notes . this premium , in addition to $ 194 million in remaining unamortized discounts related to the old notes , will be amortized as additional interest expense over the term of the new notes using the effective interest method . we may , at our option , redeem some or all of the new notes at any time by paying the principal amount of notes being redeemed plus a make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest . interest on the new notes is payable on june 15 and december 15 of each year , beginning on june 15 , 2013 . the new notes are unsecured senior obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness . on september 9 , 2011 , we issued $ 2.0 billion of long-term notes in a registered public offering consisting of $ 500 million maturing in 2016 with a fixed interest rate of 2.13% ( 2.13 % ) , $ 900 million maturing in 2021 with a fixed interest rate of 3.35% ( 3.35 % ) , and $ 600 million maturing in 2041 with a fixed interest rate of 4.85% ( 4.85 % ) . we may , at our option , redeem some or all of the notes at any time by paying the principal amount of notes being redeemed plus a make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest . interest on the notes is payable on march 15 and september 15 of each year , beginning on march 15 , 2012 . in october 2011 , we used a portion of the proceeds to redeem all of our $ 500 million long-term notes maturing in 2013 . in 2011 , we repurchased $ 84 million of our long-term notes through open-market purchases . we paid premiums of $ 48 million in connection with the early extinguishments of debt , which were recognized in other non-operating income ( expense ) , net . in august 2011 , we entered into a $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility with a group of banks and terminated our existing $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility that was to expire in june 2012 . the credit facility expires august 2016 , and we may request and the banks may grant , at their discretion , an increase to the credit facility by an additional amount up to $ 500 million . there were no borrowings outstanding under either facility through december 31 , 2012 . borrowings under the credit facility would be unsecured and bear interest at rates based , at our option , on a eurodollar rate or a base rate , as defined in the credit facility . each bank 2019s obligation to make loans under the credit facility is subject to , among other things , our compliance with various representations , warranties and covenants , including covenants limiting our ability and certain of our subsidiaries 2019 ability to encumber assets and a covenant not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio , as defined in the credit facility . the leverage ratio covenant excludes the adjustments recognized in stockholders 2019 equity related to postretirement benefit plans . as of december 31 , 2012 , we were in compliance with all covenants contained in the credit facility , as well as in our debt agreements . we have agreements in place with banking institutions to provide for the issuance of commercial paper . there were no commercial paper borrowings outstanding during 2012 or 2011 . if we were to issue commercial paper , the borrowings would be supported by the credit facility . during the next five years , we have scheduled long-term debt maturities of $ 150 million due in 2013 and $ 952 million due in 2016 . interest payments were $ 378 million in 2012 , $ 326 million in 2011 , and $ 337 million in 2010. .\nQuestion: what is the interest payment in 2012?\nAnswer: 378.0\nQuestion: what about in 2011?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "326.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3150	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the following table summarizes expected benefit payments through 2019 for the pension plans , including those payments expected to be paid from the company 2019s general assets . since the majority of the benefit payments are made in the form of lump-sum distributions , actual benefit payments may differ from expected benefit payments. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 18181</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2011</td><td>27090</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2012</td><td>21548</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>25513</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>24002</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2015-2019</td><td>128494</td></tr></table> substantially all of the company 2019s u.s . employees are eligible to participate in a defined contribution savings plan ( the 201csavings plan 201d ) sponsored by the company . the savings plan allows employees to contribute a portion of their base compensation on a pre-tax and after-tax basis in accordance with specified guidelines . the company matches a percentage of employees 2019 contributions up to certain limits . in 2007 and prior years , the company could also contribute to the savings plan a discretionary profit sharing component linked to company performance during the prior year . beginning in 2008 , the discretionary profit sharing amount related to prior year company performance was paid directly to employees as a short-term cash incentive bonus rather than as a contribution to the savings plan . in addition , the company has several defined contribution plans outside of the united states . the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans was $ 40627 , $ 35341 and $ 26996 for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . note 13 . postemployment and postretirement benefits the company maintains a postretirement plan ( the 201cpostretirement plan 201d ) providing health coverage and life insurance benefits for substantially all of its u.s . employees hired before july 1 , 2007 . the company amended the life insurance benefits under the postretirement plan effective january 1 , 2007 . the impact , net of taxes , of this amendment was an increase of $ 1715 to accumulated other comprehensive income in 2007 . in 2009 , the company recorded a $ 3944 benefit expense as a result of enhanced postretirement medical benefits under the postretirement plan provided to employees that chose to participate in a voluntary transition program. .\nQuestion: what is the total contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans in 2009 and 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "75968.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2736	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nhologic , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) future debt principal payments under these debt arrangements are approximately as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal 2008</td><td>$ 1977</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fiscal 2009</td><td>1977</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fiscal 2010</td><td>1977</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fiscal 2011</td><td>1422</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fiscal 2012</td><td>3846</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 11199</td></tr></table> 6 . derivative financial instruments and hedging agreements interest rate swaps in connection with the debt assumed from the aeg acquisition ( see notes 3 and 5 ) , the company acquired interest rate swap contracts used to convert the floating interest-rate component of certain debt obligations to fixed rates . these agreements did not qualify for hedge accounting under statements of financial accounting standards no . 133 , accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities ( 201csfas 133 201d ) and thus were marked to market each reporting period with the change in fair value recorded to other income ( expense ) , net in the accompanying consolidated statements of income . the company terminated all outstanding interest rate swaps in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 which resulted in a gain of $ 75 recorded in consolidated statement of income . forward contracts also in connection with the aeg acquisition , the company assumed certain foreign currency forward contracts to hedge , on a net basis , the foreign currency fluctuations associated with a portion of the aeg 2019s assets and liabilities that were denominated in the us dollar , including inter-company accounts . increases or decreases in the company 2019s foreign currency exposures are partially offset by gains and losses on the forward contracts , so as to mitigate foreign currency transaction gains and losses . the terms of these forward contracts are of a short- term nature ( 6 to 12 months ) . the company does not use forward contracts for trading or speculative purposes . the forward contracts are not designated as cash flow or fair value hedges under sfas no . 133 and do not represent effective hedges . all outstanding forward contracts are marked to market at the end of the period and recorded on the balance sheet at fair value in other current assets and other current liabilities . the changes in fair value from these contracts and from the underlying hedged exposures are generally offsetting were recorded in other income , net in the accompanying consolidated statements of income and these amounts were not material . as of september 29 , 2007 , all of the forward exchange contracts assumed in the aeg acquisition had matured and the company had no forward exchange contracts outstanding . 7 . pension and other employee benefits in conjunction with the may 2 , 2006 acquisition of aeg , the company assumed certain defined benefit pension plans covering the employees of the aeg german subsidiary ( pension benefits ) . on september 29 , 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no . 158 , employers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no . 87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) ( sfas 158 ) . sfas 158 requires an entity to recognize in its statement of financial position an asset for a defined benefit postretirement .\nQuestion: what is the sum of the debt principal payments for 2008 and 2009?\nAnswer: 3954.0\nQuestion: what is the debt payment for 2010?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1977.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1076	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) as a result of customer credits to be realized by electric customers of entergy louisiana , consistent with the terms of the stipulated settlement in the business combination proceeding . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits . results of operations for 2015 also include the sale in december 2015 of the 583 mw rhode island state energy center for a realized gain of $ 154 million ( $ 100 million net-of-tax ) on the sale and the $ 77 million ( $ 47 million net-of-tax ) write-off and regulatory charges to recognize that a portion of the assets associated with the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project is no longer probable of recovery . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 5829</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retail electric price</td><td>289</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>louisiana business combination customer credits</td><td>107</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-43 ( 43 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 6179</td></tr></table> the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 an increase in base rates at entergy arkansas , as approved by the apsc . the new rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . the increase included an interim base rate adjustment surcharge , effective with the first billing cycle of april 2016 , to recover the incremental revenue requirement for the period february 24 , 2016 through march 31 , 2016 . a significant portion of the increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station ; 2022 an increase in the purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider for entergy new orleans , as approved by the city council , effective with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , primarily related to the purchase of power block 1 of the union power station ; 2022 an increase in formula rate plan revenues for entergy louisiana , implemented with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of power blocks 3 and 4 of the union power station ; and 2022 an increase in revenues at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 , and an increase in revenues collected through the storm damage rider . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase . the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business combination . consistent with the terms of the stipulated settlement in the business combination proceeding , electric customers of entergy louisiana will realize customer credits associated with the business combination ; accordingly , in october 2015 , entergy recorded a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) . these costs are being entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .\nQuestion: what is the net revenue in 2016?\nAnswer: 6179.0\nQuestion: what about in 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "5829.0" } ]
CONVFINQA436	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncontinued investments in ecommerce and technology . the increase in operating expenses as a percentage of net sales for fiscal 2017 was partially offset by the impact of store closures in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 . membership and other income was relatively flat for fiscal 2018 and increased $ 1.0 billion a0for fiscal 2017 , when compared to the same period in the previous fiscal year . while fiscal 2018 included a $ 387 million gain from the sale of suburbia , a $ 47 million gain from a land sale , higher recycling income from our sustainability efforts and higher membership income from increased plus member penetration at sam's club , these gains were less than gains recognized in fiscal 2017 . fiscal 2017 included a $ 535 million gain from the sale of our yihaodian business and a $ 194 million gain from the sale of shopping malls in chile . for fiscal 2018 , loss on extinguishment of debt was a0$ 3.1 billion , due to the early extinguishment of long-term debt which allowed us to retire higher rate debt to reduce interest expense in future periods . our effective income tax rate was 30.4% ( 30.4 % ) for fiscal 2018 and 30.3% ( 30.3 % ) for both fiscal 2017 and 2016 . although relatively consistent year-over-year , our effective income tax rate may fluctuate from period to period as a result of factors including changes in our assessment of certain tax contingencies , valuation allowances , changes in tax laws , outcomes of administrative audits , the impact of discrete items and the mix of earnings among our u.s . operations and international operations . the reconciliation from the u.s . statutory rate to the effective income tax rates for fiscal 2018 , 2017 and 2016 is presented in note 9 in the \"notes to consolidated financial statements\" and describes the impact of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act of 2017 ( the \"tax act\" ) to the fiscal 2018 effective income tax rate . as a result of the factors discussed above , we reported $ 10.5 billion and $ 14.3 billion of consolidated net income for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively , which represents a decrease of $ 3.8 billion and $ 0.8 billion for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively , when compared to the previous fiscal year . diluted net income per common share attributable to walmart ( \"eps\" ) was $ 3.28 and $ 4.38 for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively . walmart u.s . segment . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( amounts in millions except unit counts )</td><td>fiscal years ended january 31 , 2018</td><td>fiscal years ended january 31 , 2017</td><td>fiscal years ended january 31 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 318477</td><td>$ 307833</td><td>$ 298378</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>percentage change from comparable period</td><td>3.5% ( 3.5 % )</td><td>3.2% ( 3.2 % )</td><td>3.6% ( 3.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>calendar comparable sales increase</td><td>2.1% ( 2.1 % )</td><td>1.6% ( 1.6 % )</td><td>1.0% ( 1.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating income</td><td>$ 17869</td><td>$ 17745</td><td>$ 19087</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>operating income as a percentage of net sales</td><td>5.6% ( 5.6 % )</td><td>5.8% ( 5.8 % )</td><td>6.4% ( 6.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>unit counts at period end</td><td>4761</td><td>4672</td><td>4574</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>retail square feet at period end</td><td>705</td><td>699</td><td>690</td></tr></table> net sales for the walmart u.s . segment increased $ 10.6 billion or 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) and $ 9.5 billion or 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively , when compared to the previous fiscal year . the increases in net sales were primarily due to increases in comparable store sales of 2.1% ( 2.1 % ) and 1.6% ( 1.6 % ) for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively , and year-over-year growth in retail square feet of 0.7% ( 0.7 % ) and 1.4% ( 1.4 % ) for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively . additionally , for fiscal 2018 , sales generated from ecommerce acquisitions further contributed to the year-over-year increase . gross profit rate decreased 24 basis points for fiscal 2018 and increased 24 basis points for fiscal 2017 , when compared to the previous fiscal year . for fiscal 2018 , the decrease was primarily due to strategic price investments and the mix impact from ecommerce . partially offsetting the negative factors for fiscal 2018 was the positive impact of savings from procuring merchandise . for fiscal 2017 , the increase in gross profit rate was primarily due to improved margin in food and consumables , including the impact of savings in procuring merchandise and lower transportation expense from lower fuel costs . operating expenses as a percentage of segment net sales was relatively flat for fiscal 2018 and increased 101 basis points for fiscal 2017 , when compared to the previous fiscal year . fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 included charges related to discontinued real estate projects of $ 244 million and $ 249 million , respectively . for fiscal 2017 , the increase was primarily driven by an increase in wage expense due to the investment in the associate wage structure ; the charge related to discontinued real estate projects ; and investments in digital retail and technology . the increase in operating expenses as a percentage of segment net sales for fiscal 2017 was partially offset by the impact of store closures in fiscal 2016 . as a result of the factors discussed above , segment operating income increased $ 124 million for fiscal 2018 and decreased $ 1.3 billion for fiscal 2017 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the net income in 2018, in millions?\nAnswer: 10500.0\nQuestion: and what was the total of net sales in that same year?\nAnswer: 318477.0\nQuestion: how much, then, does the net income represent in relation to this net sales total?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.03297" } ]
CONVFINQA3473	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\noperating profit for the segment decreased by 1% ( 1 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 . for the year , operating profit declines in defense more than offset an increase in civil , while operating profit at intelligence essentially was unchanged . the $ 27 million decrease in operating profit at defense primarily was attributable to a decrease in the level of favorable performance adjustments on mission and combat systems activities in 2010 . the $ 19 million increase in civil principally was due to higher volume on enterprise civilian services . operating profit for the segment decreased by 3% ( 3 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 . operating profit declines in civil and intelligence partially were offset by growth in defense . the decrease of $ 29 million in civil 2019s operating profit primarily was attributable to a reduction in the level of favorable performance adjustments on enterprise civilian services programs in 2009 compared to 2008 . the decrease in operating profit of $ 27 million at intelligence mainly was due to a reduction in the level of favorable performance adjustments on security solution activities in 2009 compared to 2008 . the increase in defense 2019s operating profit of $ 29 million mainly was due to volume and improved performance in mission and combat systems . the decrease in backlog during 2010 compared to 2009 mainly was due to higher sales volume on enterprise civilian service programs at civil , including volume associated with the dris 2010 program , and mission and combat system programs at defense . backlog decreased in 2009 compared to 2008 due to u.s . government 2019s exercise of the termination for convenience clause on the tsat mission operations system ( tmos ) contract at defense , which resulted in a $ 1.6 billion reduction in orders . this decline more than offset increased orders on enterprise civilian services programs at civil . we expect is&gs will experience a low single digit percentage decrease in sales for 2011 as compared to 2010 . this decline primarily is due to completion of most of the work associated with the dris 2010 program . operating profit in 2011 is expected to decline in relationship to the decline in sales volume , while operating margins are expected to be comparable between the years . space systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the design , research and development , engineering , and production of satellites , strategic and defensive missile systems , and space transportation systems , including activities related to the planned replacement of the space shuttle . government satellite programs include the advanced extremely high frequency ( aehf ) system , the mobile user objective system ( muos ) , the global positioning satellite iii ( gps iii ) system , the space-based infrared system ( sbirs ) , and the geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series ( goes-r ) . strategic and missile defense programs include the targets and countermeasures program and the fleet ballistic missile program . space transportation includes the nasa orion program and , through ownership interests in two joint ventures , expendable launch services ( united launch alliance , or ula ) and space shuttle processing activities for the u.s . government ( united space alliance , or usa ) . the space shuttle is expected to complete its final flight mission in 2011 and our involvement with its launch and processing activities will end at that time . space systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8246</td><td>$ 8654</td><td>$ 8027</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>972</td><td>972</td><td>953</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>11.8% ( 11.8 % )</td><td>11.2% ( 11.2 % )</td><td>11.9% ( 11.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>17800</td><td>16800</td><td>17900</td></tr></table> net sales for space systems decreased by 5% ( 5 % ) in 2010 compared to 2009 . sales declined in all three lines of business during the year . the $ 253 million decrease in space transportation principally was due to lower volume on the space shuttle external tank , commercial launch vehicle activity and other human space flight programs , which partially were offset by higher volume on the orion program . there were no commercial launches in 2010 compared to one commercial launch in 2009 . strategic & defensive missile systems ( s&dms ) sales declined $ 147 million principally due to lower volume on defensive missile programs . the $ 8 million sales decline in satellites primarily was attributable to lower volume on commercial satellites , which partially were offset by higher volume on government satellite activities . there was one commercial satellite delivery in 2010 and one commercial satellite delivery in 2009 . net sales for space systems increased 8% ( 8 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 . during the year , sales growth at satellites and space transportation offset a decline in s&dms . the sales growth of $ 707 million in satellites was due to higher volume in government satellite activities , which partially was offset by lower volume in commercial satellite activities . there was one commercial satellite delivery in 2009 and two deliveries in 2008 . the increase in sales of $ 21 million in space transportation primarily was due to higher volume on the orion program , which more than offset a decline in the space shuttle 2019s external tank program . there was one commercial launch in both 2009 and 2008 . s&dms 2019 sales decreased by $ 102 million mainly due to lower volume on defensive missile programs , which more than offset growth in strategic missile programs. .\nQuestion: what is the difference between the net sales and the operating profit in 2010?\nAnswer: 7274.0\nQuestion: and what were the net sales in 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "8654.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4305	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\n56 / 57 management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations junior subordinate deferrable interest debentures in june 2005 , we issued $ 100.0 a0million of trust preferred securities , which are reflected on the balance sheet as junior subordinate deferrable interest debentures . the proceeds were used to repay our revolving credit facility . the $ 100.0 a0million of junior subordi- nate deferrable interest debentures have a 30-year term ending july 2035 . they bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.61% ( 5.61 % ) for the first 10 years ending july 2015 . thereafter , the rate will float at three month libor plus 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) . the securities are redeemable at par . restrictive covenants the terms of the 2011 revolving credit facility and certain of our senior unsecured notes include certain restrictions and covenants which may limit , among other things , our ability to pay dividends ( as discussed below ) , make certain types of investments , incur additional indebtedness , incur liens and enter into negative pledge agreements and the disposition of assets , and which require compliance with financial ratios including our minimum tangible net worth , a maximum ratio of total indebtedness to total asset value , a minimum ratio of ebitda to fixed charges and a maximum ratio of unsecured indebtedness to unencumbered asset value . the dividend restriction referred to above provides that we will not during any time when we are in default , make distributions with respect to common stock or other equity interests , except to enable us to continue to qualify as a reit for federal income tax purposes . as of december a031 , 2011 and 2010 , we were in compli- ance with all such covenants . market rate risk we are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily from our floating rate borrowing arrangements . we use interest rate deriv- ative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes . a a0hypothetical 100 a0basis point increase in interest rates along the entire interest rate curve for 2011 and 2010 , would increase our annual interest cost by approximately $ 12.3 a0million and $ 11.0 a0mil- lion and would increase our share of joint venture annual interest cost by approximately $ 4.8 a0million and $ 6.7 a0million , respectively . we recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value . derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income . if a derivative is a hedge , depending on the nature of the hedge , changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged asset , liability , or firm commitment through earnings , or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings . the ineffective portion of a derivative 2019s change in fair value is recognized immediately in earnings . approximately $ 4.8 a0billion of our long- term debt bore interest a0at fixed rates , and therefore the fair value of these instru- ments is affected by changes in the market interest rates . the interest rate on our variable rate debt and joint venture debt as of december a031 , 2011 ranged from libor plus 150 a0basis points to libor plus 350 a0basis points . contractual obligations combined aggregate principal maturities of mortgages and other loans payable , our 2011 revolving credit facility , senior unsecured notes ( net of discount ) , trust preferred securities , our share of joint venture debt , including as- of-right extension options , estimated interest expense ( based on weighted average interest rates for the quarter ) , and our obligations under our capital lease and ground leases , as of december a031 , 2011 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property mortgages</td><td>$ 52443</td><td>$ 568649</td><td>$ 647776</td><td>$ 270382</td><td>$ 556400</td><td>$ 2278190</td><td>$ 4373840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>revolving credit facility</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>350000</td><td>2014</td><td>350000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trust preferred securities</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>100000</td><td>100000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>senior unsecured notes</td><td>119423</td><td>2014</td><td>98578</td><td>657</td><td>274804</td><td>777194</td><td>1270656</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>capital lease</td><td>1555</td><td>1555</td><td>1555</td><td>1592</td><td>1707</td><td>42351</td><td>50315</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>ground leases</td><td>33429</td><td>33429</td><td>33429</td><td>33429</td><td>33533</td><td>615450</td><td>782699</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>estimated interest expense</td><td>312672</td><td>309280</td><td>269286</td><td>244709</td><td>212328</td><td>470359</td><td>1818634</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>joint venture debt</td><td>176457</td><td>93683</td><td>123983</td><td>102476</td><td>527814</td><td>800102</td><td>1824515</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total</td><td>$ 695979</td><td>$ 1006596</td><td>$ 1174607</td><td>$ 653245</td><td>$ 1956586</td><td>$ 5083646</td><td>$ 10570659</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the sum of joint venture debt in 2012 and 2013?\nAnswer: 270140.0\nQuestion: what is the value including joint venture debt from 2014?\nAnswer: 394123.0\nQuestion: what is the total including 2015?\nAnswer: 496599.0\nQuestion: what is the total including 2016?\nAnswer: 1024413.0\nQuestion: what is the total less the value of joint venture debt thereafter?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "224311.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5719	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements recognizing customer revenue , the company must assess the collectability of both the amounts billed and the portion recognized on a straight-line basis . this assessment takes customer credit risk and business and industry conditions into consideration to ultimately determine the collectability of the amounts billed . to the extent the amounts , based on management 2019s estimates , may not be collectible , recognition is deferred until such point as the uncertainty is resolved . any amounts which were previously recognized as revenue and subsequently determined to be uncollectible are charged to bad debt expense . accounts receivable are reported net of allowances for doubtful accounts related to estimated losses resulting from a customer 2019s inability to make required payments and reserves for amounts invoiced whose collectability is not reasonably assured . these allowances are generally estimated based on payment patterns , days past due and collection history , and incorporate changes in economic conditions that may not be reflected in historical trends , such as customers in bankruptcy , liquidation or reorganization . receivables are written-off against the allowances when they are determined uncollectible . such determination includes analysis and consideration of the particular conditions of the account . changes in the allowances were as follows for the years ended december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1,</td><td>$ 28520</td><td>$ 11482</td><td>$ 8850</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current year increases</td><td>16219</td><td>26771</td><td>12059</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>recoveries and other</td><td>-22234 ( 22234 )</td><td>-9733 ( 9733 )</td><td>-9427 ( 9427 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31,</td><td>$ 22505</td><td>$ 28520</td><td>$ 11482</td></tr></table> the company 2019s largest international customer is iusacell , which is the brand name under which a group of companies controlled by grupo iusacell , s.a . de c.v . ( 201cgrupo iusacell 201d ) operates . iusacell represented approximately 4% ( 4 % ) of the company 2019s total revenue for the year ended december 31 , 2010 . grupo iusacell has been engaged in a refinancing of a majority of its u.s . dollar denominated debt , and in connection with this process , two of the legal entities of the group , including grupo iusacell , voluntarily filed for a pre-packaged concurso mercantil ( a process substantially equivalent to chapter 11 of u.s . bankruptcy law ) with the backing of a majority of their financial creditors in december 2010 . as of december 31 , 2010 , iusacell notes receivable , net , and related assets ( which include financing lease commitments and a deferred rent asset that are primarily long-term in nature ) were $ 19.7 million and $ 51.2 million , respectively . functional currency 2014as a result of changes to the organizational structure of the company 2019s subsidiaries in latin america in 2010 , the company determined that effective january 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of its foreign subsidiary in brazil is the brazilian real . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by the subsidiary in brazil are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in stockholders 2019 equity . the change in functional currency from u.s . dollars to brazilian real gave rise to an increase in the net value of certain non-monetary assets and liabilities . the aggregate impact on such assets and liabilities was $ 39.8 million with an offsetting increase in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) . as a result of the renegotiation of the company 2019s agreements with its largest international customer , iusacell , which included , among other changes , converting all of iusacell 2019s contractual obligations to the company from u.s . dollars to mexican pesos , the company has determined that effective april 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of certain of its foreign subsidiaries in mexico is the mexican peso . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by those subsidiaries in mexico are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in stockholders 2019 equity . the change in functional .\nQuestion: what was the value of the allowance balance for the uncollectable accounts at the end of the year?\nAnswer: 28520.0\nQuestion: what was the value at the start of the year?\nAnswer: 11482.0\nQuestion: what was the net change?\nAnswer: 17038.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.48389" } ]
CONVFINQA421	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nconsolidated income statement review net income for 2009 was $ 2.4 billion and for 2008 was $ 914 million . amounts for 2009 include operating results of national city and the fourth quarter impact of a $ 687 million after-tax gain related to blackrock 2019s acquisition of bgi . increases in income statement comparisons to 2008 , except as noted , are primarily due to the operating results of national city . our consolidated income statement is presented in item 8 of this report . net interest income and net interest margin year ended december 31 dollars in millions 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 dollars in millions</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest income</td><td>$ 9083</td><td>$ 3854</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net interest margin</td><td>3.82% ( 3.82 % )</td><td>3.37% ( 3.37 % )</td></tr></table> changes in net interest income and margin result from the interaction of the volume and composition of interest-earning assets and related yields , interest-bearing liabilities and related rates paid , and noninterest-bearing sources of funding . see statistical information 2013 analysis of year-to-year changes in net interest ( unaudited ) income and average consolidated balance sheet and net interest analysis in item 8 of this report for additional information . higher net interest income for 2009 compared with 2008 reflected the increase in average interest-earning assets due to national city and the improvement in the net interest margin . the net interest margin was 3.82% ( 3.82 % ) for 2009 and 3.37% ( 3.37 % ) for 2008 . the following factors impacted the comparison : 2022 a decrease in the rate accrued on interest-bearing liabilities of 97 basis points . the rate accrued on interest-bearing deposits , the largest component , decreased 107 basis points . 2022 these factors were partially offset by a 45 basis point decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets . the yield on loans , which represented the largest portion of our earning assets in 2009 , decreased 30 basis points . 2022 in addition , the impact of noninterest-bearing sources of funding decreased 7 basis points . for comparing to the broader market , the average federal funds rate was .16% ( .16 % ) for 2009 compared with 1.94% ( 1.94 % ) for 2008 . we expect our net interest income for 2010 will likely be modestly lower as a result of cash recoveries on purchased impaired loans in 2009 and additional run-off of higher- yielding assets , which could be mitigated by rising interest rates . this assumes our current expectations for interest rates and economic conditions 2013 we include our current economic assumptions underlying our forward-looking statements in the cautionary statement regarding forward-looking information section of this item 7 . noninterest income summary noninterest income was $ 7.1 billion for 2009 and $ 2.4 billion for 2008 . noninterest income for 2009 included the following : 2022 the gain on blackrock/bgi transaction of $ 1.076 billion , 2022 net credit-related other-than-temporary impairments ( otti ) on debt and equity securities of $ 577 million , 2022 net gains on sales of securities of $ 550 million , 2022 gains on hedging of residential mortgage servicing rights of $ 355 million , 2022 valuation and sale income related to our commercial mortgage loans held for sale , net of hedges , of $ 107 million , 2022 gains of $ 103 million related to our blackrock ltip shares adjustment in the first quarter , and net losses on private equity and alternative investments of $ 93 million . noninterest income for 2008 included the following : 2022 net otti on debt and equity securities of $ 312 million , 2022 gains of $ 246 million related to our blackrock ltip shares adjustment , 2022 valuation and sale losses related to our commercial mortgage loans held for sale , net of hedges , of $ 197 million , 2022 impairment and other losses related to private equity and alternative investments of $ 180 million , 2022 income from hilliard lyons totaling $ 164 million , including the first quarter gain of $ 114 million from the sale of this business , 2022 net gains on sales of securities of $ 106 million , and 2022 a gain of $ 95 million related to the redemption of a portion of our visa class b common shares related to visa 2019s march 2008 initial public offering . additional analysis asset management revenue increased $ 172 million to $ 858 million in 2009 , compared with $ 686 million in 2008 . this increase reflected improving equity markets , new business generation and a shift in assets into higher yielding equity investments during the second half of 2009 . assets managed totaled $ 103 billion at both december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , including the impact of national city . the asset management group section of the business segments review section of this item 7 includes further discussion of assets under management . consumer services fees totaled $ 1.290 billion in 2009 compared with $ 623 million in 2008 . service charges on deposits totaled $ 950 million for 2009 and $ 372 million for 2008 . both increases were primarily driven by the impact of the national city acquisition . reduced consumer spending .\nQuestion: what was the net interest margin ( in % ) in the year of 2009?\nAnswer: 3.82\nQuestion: and what was it in 2008?\nAnswer: 3.37\nQuestion: what was, then, the total net interest margin ( in % ) in both of those years?\nAnswer: 7.19\nQuestion: and what is the average net interest margin between those years?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "3.595" } ]
CONVFINQA8203	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 1 2014summary of significant accounting policies ( continued ) present value is accreted over the life of the related lease as an operating expense . all of the company 2019s existing asset retirement obligations are associated with commitments to return property subject to operating leases to original condition upon lease termination . the following table reconciles changes in the company 2019s asset retirement liabilities for fiscal 2006 and 2005 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>asset retirement liability as of september 25 2004</td><td>$ 8.2</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additional asset retirement obligations recognized</td><td>2.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accretion recognized</td><td>0.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>asset retirement liability as of september 24 2005</td><td>$ 11.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additional asset retirement obligations recognized</td><td>2.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accretion recognized</td><td>0.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>asset retirement liability as of september 30 2006</td><td>$ 14.7</td></tr></table> long-lived assets including goodwill and other acquired intangible assets the company reviews property , plant , and equipment and certain identifiable intangibles , excluding goodwill , for impairment in accordance with sfas no . 144 , accounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of . long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable . recoverability of these assets is measured by comparison of its carrying amount to future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate . if property , plant , and equipment and certain identifiable intangibles are considered to be impaired , the impairment to be recognized equals the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds its fair market value . for the three fiscal years ended september 30 , 2006 , the company had no material impairment of its long-lived assets , except for the impairment of certain assets in connection with the restructuring actions described in note 6 of these notes to consolidated financial statements . sfas no . 142 , goodwill and other intangible assets requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives should not be amortized but rather be tested for impairment at least annually or sooner whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that they may be impaired . the company performs its goodwill impairment tests on or about august 30 of each year . the company did not recognize any goodwill or intangible asset impairment charges in 2006 , 2005 , or 2004 . the company established reporting units based on its current reporting structure . for purposes of testing goodwill for impairment , goodwill has been allocated to these reporting units to the extent it relates to each reporting sfas no . 142 also requires that intangible assets with definite lives be amortized over their estimated useful lives and reviewed for impairment in accordance with sfas no . 144 . the company is currently amortizing its acquired intangible assets with definite lives over periods ranging from 3 to 10 years . foreign currency translation the company translates the assets and liabilities of its international non-u.s . functional currency subsidiaries into u.s . dollars using exchange rates in effect at the end of each period . revenue and expenses for these subsidiaries are translated using rates that approximate those in effect during the period . gains and losses from these translations are credited or charged to foreign currency translation .\nQuestion: what was the asset retirement liability in 2006?\nAnswer: 14.7\nQuestion: and was that of 2005?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "11.7" } ]
CONVFINQA9037	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nitem 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters . the information required by item 12 is included under the heading 201csecurity ownership of management and certain beneficial owners 201d in the 2017 proxy statement , and that information is incorporated by reference in this form 10-k . equity compensation plan information the following table provides information about our equity compensation plans that authorize the issuance of shares of lockheed martin common stock to employees and directors . the information is provided as of december 31 , 2016 . plan category number of securities to be issued exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders ( 1 ) 5802673 $ 85.82 6216471 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 1082347 2014 2481032 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to beissued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( a )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options warrants and rights ( b )</td><td>number of securities remaining availablefor future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by securityholders ( 1 )</td><td>5802673</td><td>$ 85.82</td><td>6216471</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved bysecurity holders ( 2 )</td><td>1082347</td><td>2014</td><td>2481032</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>6885020</td><td>$ 85.82</td><td>8697503</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) column ( a ) includes , as of december 31 , 2016 : 1747151 shares that have been granted as restricted stock units ( rsus ) , 936308 shares that could be earned pursuant to grants of performance stock units ( psus ) ( assuming the maximum number of psus are earned and payable at the end of the three-year performance period ) and 2967046 shares granted as options under the lockheed martin corporation 2011 incentive performance award plan ( 2011 ipa plan ) or predecessor plans prior to january 1 , 2013 and 23346 shares granted as options and 128822 stock units payable in stock or cash under the lockheed martin corporation 2009 directors equity plan ( directors equity plan ) or predecessor plans for members ( or former members ) of the board of directors . column ( c ) includes , as of december 31 , 2016 , 5751655 shares available for future issuance under the 2011 ipa plan as options , stock appreciation rights ( sars ) , restricted stock awards ( rsas ) , rsus or psus and 464816 shares available for future issuance under the directors equity plan as stock options and stock units . of the 5751655 shares available for grant under the 2011 ipa plan on december 31 , 2016 , 516653 and 236654 shares are issuable pursuant to grants made on january 26 , 2017 , of rsus and psus ( assuming the maximum number of psus are earned and payable at the end of the three-year performance period ) , respectively . the weighted average price does not take into account shares issued pursuant to rsus or psus . ( 2 ) the shares represent annual incentive bonuses and long-term incentive performance ( ltip ) payments earned and voluntarily deferred by employees . the deferred amounts are payable under the deferred management incentive compensation plan ( dmicp ) . deferred amounts are credited as phantom stock units at the closing price of our stock on the date the deferral is effective . amounts equal to our dividend are credited as stock units at the time we pay a dividend . following termination of employment , a number of shares of stock equal to the number of stock units credited to the employee 2019s dmicp account are distributed to the employee . there is no discount or value transfer on the stock distributed . distributions may be made from newly issued shares or shares purchased on the open market . historically , all distributions have come from shares held in a separate trust and , therefore , do not further dilute our common shares outstanding . as a result , these shares also were not considered in calculating the total weighted average exercise price in the table . because the dmicp shares are outstanding , they should be included in the denominator ( and not the numerator ) of a dilution calculation . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions and director independence . the information required by this item 13 is included under the captions 201ccorporate governance 2013 related person transaction policy , 201d 201ccorporate governance 2013 certain relationships and related person transactions of directors , executive officers , and 5 percent stockholders , 201d and 201ccorporate governance 2013 director independence 201d in the 2017 proxy statement , and that information is incorporated by reference in this form 10-k . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services . the information required by this item 14 is included under the caption 201cproposal 2 2013 ratification of appointment of independent auditors 201d in the 2017 proxy statement , and that information is incorporated by reference in this form 10-k. .\nQuestion: what is the number of securities to be issued?\nAnswer: 5802673.0\nQuestion: what is the average price per security?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "85.82" } ]
CONVFINQA8176	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ngain on land sales are derived from sales of undeveloped land owned by us . we pursue opportunities to dispose of land in markets with a high concentration of undeveloped land and in those markets where the land no longer meets our strategic development plans . the increase was partially attributable to a land sale to a current corporate tenant for potential future expansion . we recorded $ 424000 and $ 560000 of impairment charges associated with contracts to sell land parcels for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2004 , only one parcel on which we recorded impairment charges is still owned by us . we anticipate selling this parcel in the first quarter of 2005 . discontinued operations we have classified operations of 86 buildings as discontinued operations as of december 31 , 2004 . these 86 buildings consist of 69 industrial , 12 office and five retail properties . as a result , we classified net income from operations , net of minority interest , of $ 1.6 million , $ 6.3 million and $ 10.7 million as net income from discontinued operations for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . in addition , 41 of the properties classified in discontinued operations were sold during 2004 , 42 properties were sold during 2003 , two properties were sold during 2002 and one operating property is classified as held-for-sale at december 31 , 2004 . the gains on disposal of these properties , net of impairment adjustment and minority interest , of $ 23.9 million and $ 11.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 , respectively , are also reported in discontinued operations . for the year ended december 31 , 2002 , a $ 4.5 million loss on disposal of properties , net of impairment adjustments and minority interest , is reported in discontinued operations due to impairment charges of $ 7.7 million recorded on three properties in 2002 that were later sold in 2003 and 2004 . comparison of year ended december 31 , 2003 to year ended december 31 , 2002 rental income from continuing operations rental income from continuing operations increased from $ 652.8 million in 2002 to $ 689.3 million in 2003 . the following table reconciles rental income by reportable segment to our total reported rental income from continuing operations for the years ended december 31 , 2003 and 2002 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>office</td><td>$ 419962</td><td>$ 393810</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>industrial</td><td>259762</td><td>250391</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>retail</td><td>5863</td><td>4733</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>3756</td><td>3893</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 689343</td><td>$ 652827</td></tr></table> although our three reportable segments comprising rental operations ( office , industrial and retail ) are all within the real estate industry , they are not necessarily affected by the same economic and industry conditions . for example , our retail segment experienced high occupancies and strong overall performance during 2003 , while our office and industrial segments reflected the weaker economic environment for those property types . the primary causes of the increase in rental income from continuing operations , with specific references to a particular segment when applicable , are summarized below : 25cf during 2003 , in-service occupancy improved from 87.1% ( 87.1 % ) at the end of 2002 to 89.3% ( 89.3 % ) at the end of 2003 . the second half of 2003 was highlighted by a significant increase in the industrial portfolio occupancy of 2.1% ( 2.1 % ) along with a slight increase in office portfolio occupancy of 0.9% ( 0.9 % ) . 25cf lease termination fees totaled $ 27.4 million in 2002 compared to $ 16.2 million in 2003 . most of this decrease was attributable to the office segment , which recognized $ 21.1 million of termination fees in 2002 as compared to $ 11.8 million in 2003 . lease termination fees relate to specific tenants that pay a fee to terminate their lease obligations before the end of the contractual lease term . the high volume of termination fees in 2002 was reflective of the contraction of the business of large office users during that year and their desire to downsize their use of office space . the decrease in termination fees for 2003 was indicative of an improving economy and a more stable financial position of our tenants . 25cf during the year ended 2003 , we acquired $ 232 million of properties totaling 2.1 million square feet . the acquisitions were primarily class a office buildings in existing markets with overall occupancy near 90% ( 90 % ) . revenues associated with these acquisitions totaled $ 11.9 million in 2003 . in addition , revenues from 2002 acquisitions totaled $ 15.8 million in 2003 compared to $ 4.8 million in 2002 . this significant increase is primarily due to a large office acquisition that closed at the end of december 2002 . 25cf developments placed in-service in 2003 provided revenues of $ 6.6 million , while revenues associated with developments placed in-service in 2002 totaled $ 13.7 million in 2003 compared to $ 4.7 million in 25cf proceeds from dispositions of held for rental properties totaled $ 126.1 million in 2003 , compared to $ 40.9 million in 2002 . these properties generated revenue of $ 12.5 million in 2003 versus $ 19.6 million in 2002 . equity in earnings of unconsolidated companies equity in earnings represents our ownership share of net income from investments in unconsolidated companies . these joint ventures generally own and operate rental properties and hold land for development . these earnings decreased from $ 27.2 million in 2002 to $ 23.7 million in 2003 . this decrease is a result of the following significant activity: .\nQuestion: what are the lease termination fees in 2013?\nAnswer: 16.2\nQuestion: what is the rental income from continuing operations in 2013?\nAnswer: 689.3\nQuestion: what fraction does lease termination fees represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.0235" } ]
CONVFINQA9416	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntax benefits recognized for stock-based compensation during the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , were $ 16 million , $ 6 million and $ 5 million , respectively . the amount of northrop grumman shares issued before the spin-off to satisfy stock-based compensation awards are recorded by northrop grumman and , accordingly , are not reflected in hii 2019s consolidated financial statements . the company realized tax benefits during the year ended december 31 , 2011 , of $ 2 million from the exercise of stock options and $ 10 million from the issuance of stock in settlement of rpsrs and rsrs . unrecognized compensation expense at december 31 , 2011 there was $ 1 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock option awards , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.1 years . in addition , at december 31 , 2011 , there was $ 19 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with the 2011 rsrs , which will be recognized over a period of 2.2 years ; $ 10 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with the rpsrs converted as part of the spin-off , which will be recognized over a weighted average period of one year ; and $ 18 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with the 2011 rpsrs which will be recognized over a period of 2.0 years . stock options the compensation expense for the outstanding converted stock options was determined at the time of grant by northrop grumman . there were no additional options granted during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . the fair value of the stock option awards is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the options . the fair value of each of the stock option award was estimated on the date of grant using a black-scholes option pricing model based on the following assumptions : dividend yield 2014the dividend yield was based on northrop grumman 2019s historical dividend yield level . volatility 2014expected volatility was based on the average of the implied volatility from traded options and the historical volatility of northrop grumman 2019s stock . risk-free interest rate 2014the risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the stock option award was based on the yield curve of a zero-coupon u.s . treasury bond on the date the award was granted with a maturity equal to the expected term of the award . expected term 2014the expected term of awards granted was derived from historical experience and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding . a stratification of expected terms based on employee populations ( executive and non-executive ) was considered in the analysis . the following significant weighted-average assumptions were used to value stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2.9% ( 2.9 % )</td><td>3.6% ( 3.6 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volatility rate</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.3% ( 2.3 % )</td><td>1.7% ( 1.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected option life ( years )</td><td>6</td><td>5 & 6</td></tr></table> the weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , was $ 11 and $ 7 , per share , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options in 2010?\nAnswer: 11.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2009?\nAnswer: 7.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the change over the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "4.0" } ]
CONVFINQA3779	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) the estimated future benefit payments expected to be paid are presented below . domestic pension plan foreign pension plans domestic postretirement benefit plan . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years</td><td>domesticpension plan</td><td>foreignpension plans</td><td>domestic postretirementbenefit plan</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 14.5</td><td>$ 21.7</td><td>$ 3.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2020</td><td>8.8</td><td>18.7</td><td>2.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2021</td><td>8.0</td><td>19.8</td><td>2.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2022</td><td>8.3</td><td>20.9</td><td>2.4</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2023</td><td>7.8</td><td>21.8</td><td>2.2</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2024 - 2028</td><td>36.7</td><td>117.2</td><td>9.8</td></tr></table> the estimated future payments for our domestic postretirement benefit plan are net of any estimated u.s . federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug , improvement and modernization act of 2003 , which total no more than $ 0.3 in any individual year . savings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans ( the 201csavings plans 201d ) that cover substantially all domestic employees . the savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allow participants to choose among various investment alternatives . we match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service . amounts expensed for the savings plans for 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 52.6 , $ 47.2 and $ 47.0 , respectively . expenses include a discretionary company contribution of $ 6.7 , $ 3.6 and $ 6.1 offset by participant forfeitures of $ 5.8 , $ 4.6 and $ 4.4 in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . in addition , we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $ 51.3 , $ 47.4 and $ 44.5 to these plans in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . deferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation and benefit arrangements which ( i ) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation or ( ii ) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account . these arrangements may provide participants with the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions , such as completing a certain number of years of service , attaining a certain age or upon retirement or termination . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liability balance was $ 196.2 and $ 213.2 , respectively . amounts expensed for deferred compensation and benefit arrangements in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were $ 10.0 , $ 18.5 and $ 18.5 , respectively . we have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the cash surrender value of these policies was $ 177.3 and $ 177.4 , respectively . long-term disability plan we have a long-term disability plan which provides income replacement benefits to eligible participants who are unable to perform their job duties or any job related to his or her education , training or experience . as all income replacement benefits are fully insured , no related obligation is required as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 . in addition to income replacement benefits , plan participants may remain covered for certain health and life insurance benefits up to normal retirement age , and accordingly , we have recorded an obligation of $ 5.9 and $ 8.4 as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively. .\nQuestion: in 2019, what was the total of the foreign pension plan?\nAnswer: 21.7\nQuestion: and what was that total for the domestic one?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "14.5" } ]
CONVFINQA4430	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nfederal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation - continued three years ended december 31 , 2011 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) balance , december 31 , 2008................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2009................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2010................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2011................................................................................................................................... . $ 846258 103698 ( 11869 ) 938087 108261 ( 11144 ) 1035204 114180 ( 21796 ) $ 1127588 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance december 31 2008</td><td>$ 846258</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>103698</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-11869 ( 11869 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance december 31 2009</td><td>938087</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>108261</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-11144 ( 11144 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2010</td><td>1035204</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense</td><td>114180</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property</td><td>-21796 ( 21796 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance december 31 2011</td><td>$ 1127588</td></tr></table> federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation - continued three years ended december 31 , 2011 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) balance , december 31 , 2008................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2009................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2010................................................................................................................................... . additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense .................................................................... . deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property ................................................................. . balance , december 31 , 2011................................................................................................................................... . $ 846258 103698 ( 11869 ) 938087 108261 ( 11144 ) 1035204 114180 ( 21796 ) $ 1127588 .\nQuestion: what was the value in 2009?\nAnswer: 108261.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2008?\nAnswer: 103698.0\nQuestion: what is the ratio of 2009 to 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.044" } ]
CONVFINQA9226	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis stock restrict the amount of retained earnings available for the payment of cash dividends or other distributions on its common and preferred stock . sources of capital entergy arkansas 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt or preferred stock issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . entergy arkansas may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt and preferred stock prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common and preferred stock issuances by entergy arkansas require prior regulatory approval . preferred stock and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in entergy arkansas 2019s corporate charters , bond indentures , and other agreements . entergy arkansas has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . entergy arkansas 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>( $ 51232 )</td><td>( $ 52742 )</td><td>$ 2218</td><td>$ 17531</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy arkansas has a credit facility in the amount of $ 150 million scheduled to expire in august 2021 . entergy arkansas also has a $ 20 million credit facility scheduled to expire in april 2017 . the $ 150 million credit facility allows entergy arkansas to issue letters of credit against 50% ( 50 % ) of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no cash borrowings and no letters of credit outstanding under the credit facilities . in addition , entergy arkansas is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations under miso . as of december 31 , 2016 , a $ 1 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy arkansas 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 80 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2016 , no letters of credit were outstanding under the credit facility to support commercial paper issued by the entergy arkansas nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility . entergy arkansas obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2017 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 250 million at any time outstanding and long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy arkansas 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy arkansas are limited to amounts authorized by the apsc and the tennessee regulatory authority ; the current authorizations extend through december 2018. .\nQuestion: what was the balance of money pool in 2016?\nAnswer: 51232.0\nQuestion: and what was it in 2015?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "52742.0" } ]
CONVFINQA1861	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\navailable information . the company 2019s annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8- k , proxy statements and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the company 2019s internet website at http://www.everestregroup.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) . item 1a . risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector during the fourth quarter of 2014 . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . subsequent to april 1 , 2010 , we define a catastrophe as an event that causes a loss on property exposures before reinsurance of at least $ 10.0 million , before corporate level reinsurance and taxes . prior to april 1 , 2010 , we used a threshold of $ 5.0 million . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calendar year:</td><td>pre-tax catastrophe losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 62.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>195.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>410.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1300.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2010</td><td>571.1</td></tr></table> our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .\nQuestion: what is the sum of accumulated pre-tax catastrophe loss in 2010 and 2011?\nAnswer: 1871.5\nQuestion: what is the sum including 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2281.5" } ]
CONVFINQA3201	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements equitable discretion and not require refunds for the 20-month period from september 13 , 2001 - may 2 , 2003 . because the ruling on refunds relied on findings in the interruptible load proceeding , which is discussed in a separate section below , the ferc concluded that the refund ruling will be held in abeyance pending the outcome of the rehearing requests in that proceeding . on the second issue , the ferc reversed its prior decision and ordered that the prospective bandwidth remedy begin on june 1 , 2005 ( the date of its initial order in the proceeding ) rather than january 1 , 2006 , as it had previously ordered . pursuant to the october 2011 order , entergy was required to calculate the additional bandwidth payments for the period june - december 2005 utilizing the bandwidth formula tariff prescribed by the ferc that was filed in a december 2006 compliance filing and accepted by the ferc in an april 2007 order . as is the case with bandwidth remedy payments , these payments and receipts will ultimately be paid by utility operating company customers to other utility operating company customers . in december 2011 , entergy filed with the ferc its compliance filing that provides the payments and receipts among the utility operating companies pursuant to the ferc 2019s october 2011 order . the filing shows the following payments/receipts among the utility operating companies : payments ( receipts ) ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>payments ( receipts ) ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>entergy arkansas</td><td>$ 156</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>entergy gulf states louisiana</td><td>( $ 75 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>entergy louisiana</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>entergy mississippi</td><td>( $ 33 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>entergy new orleans</td><td>( $ 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>entergy texas</td><td>( $ 43 )</td></tr></table> entergy arkansas made its payment in january 2012 . in february 2012 , entergy arkansas filed for an interim adjustment to its production cost allocation rider requesting that the $ 156 million payment be collected from customers over the 22-month period from march 2012 through december 2013 . in march 2012 the apsc issued an order stating that the payment can be recovered from retail customers through the production cost allocation rider , subject to refund . the lpsc and the apsc have requested rehearing of the ferc 2019s october 2011 order . in december 2013 the lpsc filed a petition for a writ of mandamus at the united states court of appeals for the d.c . circuit . in its petition , the lpsc requested that the d.c . circuit issue an order compelling the ferc to issue a final order on pending rehearing requests . in its response to the lpsc petition , the ferc committed to rule on the pending rehearing request before the end of february . in january 2014 the d.c . circuit denied the lpsc's petition . the apsc , the lpsc , the puct , and other parties intervened in the december 2011 compliance filing proceeding , and the apsc and the lpsc also filed protests . calendar year 2013 production costs the liabilities and assets for the preliminary estimate of the payments and receipts required to implement the ferc 2019s remedy based on calendar year 2013 production costs were recorded in december 2013 , based on certain year-to-date information . the preliminary estimate was recorded based on the following estimate of the payments/receipts among the utility operating companies for 2014. .\nQuestion: what portion of the entergy arkansas payment goes to entergy mississippi?\nAnswer: 0.21154\nQuestion: and which portion goes to entergy texas?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.27564" } ]
CONVFINQA1875	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nwestrock company notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) consistent with prior years , we consider a portion of our earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries as subject to repatriation and we provide for taxes accordingly . however , we consider the unremitted earnings and all other outside basis differences from all other foreign subsidiaries to be indefinitely reinvested . accordingly , we have not provided for any taxes that would be due . as of september 30 , 2019 , we estimate our outside basis difference in foreign subsidiaries that are considered indefinitely reinvested to be approximately $ 1.6 billion . the components of the outside basis difference are comprised of purchase accounting adjustments , undistributed earnings , and equity components . except for the portion of our earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries where we provided for taxes , we have not provided for any taxes that would be due upon the reversal of the outside basis differences . however , in the event of a distribution in the form of dividends or dispositions of the subsidiaries , we may be subject to incremental u.s . income taxes , subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits , and withholding taxes or income taxes payable to the foreign jurisdictions . as of september 30 , 2019 , the determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to any remaining undistributed foreign earnings not subject to the transition tax and additional outside basis differences is not practicable . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of fiscal year</td><td>$ 127.1</td><td>$ 148.9</td><td>$ 166.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions related to purchase accounting ( 1 )</td><td>1.0</td><td>3.4</td><td>7.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions taken in current year ( 2 )</td><td>103.8</td><td>3.1</td><td>5.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions for tax positions taken in prior fiscal years</td><td>1.8</td><td>18.0</td><td>15.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reductions for tax positions taken in prior fiscal years</td><td>( 0.5 )</td><td>( 5.3 )</td><td>( 25.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions due to settlement ( 3 )</td><td>( 4.0 )</td><td>( 29.4 )</td><td>( 14.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>( reductions ) additions for currency translation adjustments</td><td>-1.7 ( 1.7 )</td><td>-9.6 ( 9.6 )</td><td>2.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>reductions as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute oflimitations</td><td>( 3.2 )</td><td>( 2.0 )</td><td>( 8.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at end of fiscal year</td><td>$ 224.3</td><td>$ 127.1</td><td>$ 148.9</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amounts in fiscal 2019 relate to the kapstone acquisition . amounts in fiscal 2018 and 2017 relate to the mps acquisition . ( 2 ) additions for tax positions taken in current fiscal year includes primarily positions taken related to foreign subsidiaries . ( 3 ) amounts in fiscal 2019 relate to the settlements of state and foreign audit examinations . amounts in fiscal 2018 relate to the settlement of state audit examinations and federal and state amended returns filed related to affirmative adjustments for which there was a reserve . amounts in fiscal 2017 relate to the settlement of federal and state audit examinations with taxing authorities . as of september 30 , 2019 and 2018 , the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $ 224.3 million and $ 127.1 million , respectively , exclusive of interest and penalties . of these balances , as of september 30 , 2019 and 2018 , if we were to prevail on all unrecognized tax benefits recorded , approximately $ 207.5 million and $ 108.7 million , respectively , would benefit the effective tax rate . we regularly evaluate , assess and adjust the related liabilities in light of changing facts and circumstances , which could cause the effective tax rate to fluctuate from period to period . resolution of the uncertain tax positions could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows or materially benefit our results of operations in future periods depending upon their ultimate resolution . see 201cnote 18 . commitments and contingencies 2014 brazil tax liability 201d we recognize estimated interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income . as of september 30 , 2019 , we had liabilities of $ 80.0 million related to estimated interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits . as of september 30 , 2018 , we had liabilities of $ 70.4 million , related to estimated interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits . our results of operations for the fiscal year ended september 30 , 2019 , 2018 and 2017 include expense of $ 9.7 million , $ 5.8 million and $ 7.4 million , respectively , net of indirect benefits , related to estimated interest and penalties with respect to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits . as of september 30 , 2019 , it is reasonably possible that our unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by up to $ 8.7 million in the next twelve months due to expiration of various statues of limitations and settlement of issues. .\nQuestion: what was the value of gross unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2018?\nAnswer: 127.1\nQuestion: what was the value at the end of 2017?\nAnswer: 148.9\nQuestion: what is the net difference?\nAnswer: -21.8\nQuestion: what was the 2017 value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "148.9" } ]
CONVFINQA1409	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnote 11 2013 stock-based compensation during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we recorded non-cash stock-based compensation expense totaling $ 164 million , $ 189 million and $ 167 million , which is included as a component of other unallocated , net on our statements of earnings . the net impact to earnings for the respective years was $ 107 million , $ 122 million and $ 108 million . as of december 31 , 2014 , we had $ 91 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years . we received cash from the exercise of stock options totaling $ 308 million , $ 827 million and $ 440 million during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 . in addition , our income tax liabilities for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were reduced by $ 215 million , $ 158 million , $ 96 million due to recognized tax benefits on stock-based compensation arrangements . stock-based compensation plans under plans approved by our stockholders , we are authorized to grant key employees stock-based incentive awards , including options to purchase common stock , stock appreciation rights , restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) or other stock units . the exercise price of options to purchase common stock may not be less than the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant . no award of stock options may become fully vested prior to the third anniversary of the grant and no portion of a stock option grant may become vested in less than one year . the minimum vesting period for restricted stock or stock units payable in stock is three years . award agreements may provide for shorter or pro-rated vesting periods or vesting following termination of employment in the case of death , disability , divestiture , retirement , change of control or layoff . the maximum term of a stock option or any other award is 10 years . at december 31 , 2014 , inclusive of the shares reserved for outstanding stock options , rsus and psus , we had 19 million shares reserved for issuance under the plans . at december 31 , 2014 , 7.8 million of the shares reserved for issuance remained available for grant under our stock-based compensation plans . we issue new shares upon the exercise of stock options or when restrictions on rsus and psus have been satisfied . the following table summarizes activity related to nonvested rsus during 2014 : number of rsus ( in thousands ) weighted average grant-date fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of rsus ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted average grant-date fair value pershare</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2011</td><td>4302</td><td>$ 78.25</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>1987</td><td>81.93</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-1299 ( 1299 )</td><td>80.64</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-168 ( 168 )</td><td>79.03</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2012</td><td>4822</td><td>$ 79.10</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>granted</td><td>1356</td><td>89.24</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>vested</td><td>-2093 ( 2093 )</td><td>79.26</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-226 ( 226 )</td><td>81.74</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2013</td><td>3859</td><td>$ 82.42</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>granted</td><td>745</td><td>146.85</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>vested</td><td>-2194 ( 2194 )</td><td>87.66</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-84 ( 84 )</td><td>91.11</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2014</td><td>2326</td><td>$ 97.80</td></tr></table> rsus are valued based on the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant . employees who are granted rsus receive the right to receive shares of stock after completion of the vesting period ; however , the shares are not issued and the employees cannot sell or transfer shares prior to vesting and have no voting rights until the rsus vest , generally three years from the date of the award . employees who are granted rsus receive dividend-equivalent cash payments only upon vesting . for these rsu awards , the grant-date fair value is equal to the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant less a discount to reflect the delay in payment of dividend-equivalent cash payments . we recognize the grant-date fair value of rsus , less estimated forfeitures , as compensation expense ratably over the requisite service period , which beginning with the rsus granted in 2013 is shorter than the vesting period if the employee is retirement eligible on the date of grant or will become retirement eligible before the end of the vesting period. .\nQuestion: what is the non-cash stock-based compensation expense in 2013?\nAnswer: 189.0\nQuestion: what about in 2012?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "167.0" } ]
CONVFINQA8712	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ntable of contents primarily to certain undistributed foreign earnings for which no u.s . taxes are provided because such earnings are intended to be indefinitely reinvested outside the u.s . the lower effective tax rate in 2010 as compared to 2009 is due primarily to an increase in foreign earnings on which u.s . income taxes have not been provided as such earnings are intended to be indefinitely reinvested outside the u.s . as of september 25 , 2010 , the company had deferred tax assets arising from deductible temporary differences , tax losses , and tax credits of $ 2.4 billion , and deferred tax liabilities of $ 5.0 billion . management believes it is more likely than not that forecasted income , including income that may be generated as a result of certain tax planning strategies , together with future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences , will be sufficient to fully recover the deferred tax assets . the company will continue to evaluate the realizability of deferred tax assets quarterly by assessing the need for and amount of a valuation allowance . the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . the company has contested certain of these adjustments through the irs appeals office . the irs is currently examining the years 2007 through 2009 . all irs audit issues for years prior to 2004 have been resolved . during the third quarter of 2010 , the company reached a tax settlement with the irs for the years 2002 through 2003 . in addition , the company is subject to audits by state , local , and foreign tax authorities . management believes that adequate provision has been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income taxes in the period such resolution occurs . liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics as of and for the three years ended september 25 , 2010 ( in millions ) : as of september 25 , 2010 , the company had $ 51 billion in cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities , an increase of $ 17 billion from september 26 , 2009 . the principal component of this net increase was the cash generated by operating activities of $ 18.6 billion , which was partially offset by payments for acquisition of property , plant and equipment of $ 2 billion and payments made in connection with business acquisitions , net of cash acquired , of $ 638 million . the company 2019s marketable securities investment portfolio is invested primarily in highly rated securities , generally with a minimum rating of single-a or equivalent . as of september 25 , 2010 and september 26 , 2009 , $ 30.8 billion and $ 17.4 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s . dollar-denominated holdings . the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital asset purchases , outstanding commitments and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 51011</td><td>$ 33992</td><td>$ 24490</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accounts receivable net</td><td>$ 5510</td><td>$ 3361</td><td>$ 2422</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories</td><td>$ 1051</td><td>$ 455</td><td>$ 509</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>working capital</td><td>$ 20956</td><td>$ 20049</td><td>$ 18645</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>annual operating cash flow</td><td>$ 18595</td><td>$ 10159</td><td>$ 9596</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the value of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities in 2010?\nAnswer: 51011.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2008?\nAnswer: 24490.0\nQuestion: what was the change in value?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "26521.0" } ]
CONVFINQA480	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ndecember 18 , 2007 , we issued an additional 23182197 shares of common stock to citadel . the issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to section 4 ( 2 ) of the securities act of 1933 , and each purchaser has represented to us that it is an 201caccredited investor 201d as defined in regulation d promulgated under the securities act of 1933 , and that the common stock was being acquired for investment . we did not engage in a general solicitation or advertising with regard to the issuances of the common stock and have not offered securities to the public in connection with the issuances . see item 1 . business 2014citadel investment . performance graph the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor 2019s ( 201cs&p 201d ) 500 and the s&p super cap diversified financials during the period from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/02</td><td>12/03</td><td>12/04</td><td>12/05</td><td>12/06</td><td>12/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>etrade financial corporation</td><td>100.00</td><td>260.29</td><td>307.61</td><td>429.22</td><td>461.32</td><td>73.05</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p super cap diversified financials</td><td>100.00</td><td>139.29</td><td>156.28</td><td>170.89</td><td>211.13</td><td>176.62</td></tr></table> 2022 $ 100 invested on 12/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 . 2022 copyright a9 2008 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .\nQuestion: what was the value of etrade financial corp as of 12/07?\nAnswer: 73.05\nQuestion: what is the value less a $100 initial investment?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-26.95" } ]
CONVFINQA3865	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nschlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock issued in treasury shares outstanding ( stated in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>issued</td><td>in treasury</td><td>shares outstanding</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance january 1 2008</td><td>1334</td><td>-138 ( 138 )</td><td>1196</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>12</td><td>12</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance december 31 2008</td><td>1334</td><td>-140 ( 140 )</td><td>1194</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>vesting of restricted stock</td><td>2013</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>4</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td><td>-8 ( 8 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>balance december 31 2009</td><td>1334</td><td>-139 ( 139 )</td><td>1195</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>acquisition of smith international inc .</td><td>100</td><td>76</td><td>176</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged</td><td>2013</td><td>6</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>shares issued under employee stock purchase plan</td><td>2013</td><td>3</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td>stock repurchase program</td><td>2013</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td>issued on conversions of debentures</td><td>2013</td><td>8</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td>balance december 31 2010</td><td>1434</td><td>-73 ( 73 )</td><td>1361</td></tr></table> see the notes to consolidated financial statements part ii , item 8 .\nQuestion: what was the balance of shares at the end of 2008?\nAnswer: 1194.0\nQuestion: what was the balance of shares at the end of 2009?\nAnswer: 1195.0\nQuestion: what is the sum?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "2389.0" } ]
CONVFINQA7100	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nabiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 8 . stock award plans and stock-based compensation ( continued ) restricted stock and restricted stock units the following table summarizes restricted stock and restricted stock unit activity for the fiscal year ended march 31 , 2012 : number of shares ( in thousands ) weighted average grant date fair value ( per share ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of shares ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted average grant date fair value ( per share )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>restricted stock and restricted stock units at beginning of year</td><td>407</td><td>$ 9.84</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>607</td><td>18.13</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-134 ( 134 )</td><td>10.88</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>13.72</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>restricted stock and restricted stock units at end of year</td><td>871</td><td>$ 15.76</td></tr></table> the remaining unrecognized compensation expense for outstanding restricted stock and restricted stock units , including performance-based awards , as of march 31 , 2012 was $ 7.1 million and the weighted-average period over which this cost will be recognized is 2.2 years . the weighted average grant-date fair value for restricted stock and restricted stock units granted during the years ended march 31 , 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 was $ 18.13 , $ 10.00 and $ 7.67 per share , respectively . the total fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock units vested in fiscal years 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 was $ 1.5 million , $ 1.0 million and $ 0.4 million , respectively . performance-based awards included in the restricted stock and restricted stock units activity discussed above are certain awards granted in fiscal years 2012 , 2011 and 2010 that vest subject to certain performance-based criteria . in june 2010 , 311000 shares of restricted stock and a performance-based award for the potential issuance of 45000 shares of common stock were issued to certain executive officers and members of senior management of the company , all of which would vest upon achievement of prescribed service milestones by the award recipients and performance milestones by the company . during the year ended march 31 , 2011 , the company determined that it met the prescribed performance targets and a portion of these shares and stock options vested . the remaining shares will vest upon satisfaction of prescribed service conditions by the award recipients . during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 , the company determined that it should have been using the graded vesting method instead of the straight-line method to expense stock-based compensation for the performance-based awards issued in june 2010 . this resulted in additional stock based compensation expense of approximately $ 0.6 million being recorded during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 that should have been recorded during the year ended march 31 , 2011 . the company believes that the amount is not material to its march 31 , 2011 consolidated financial statements and therefore recorded the adjustment in the quarter ended june 30 , 2011 . during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 , performance-based awards of restricted stock units for the potential issuance of 284000 shares of common stock were issued to certain executive officers and members of the senior management , all of which would vest upon achievement of prescribed service milestones by the award recipients and revenue performance milestones by the company . as of march 31 , 2012 , the company determined that it met the prescribed targets for 184000 shares underlying these awards and it believes it is probable that the prescribed performance targets will be met for the remaining 100000 shares , and the compensation expense is being recognized accordingly . during the year ended march 31 , 2012 , the company has recorded $ 3.3 million in stock-based compensation expense for equity awards in which the prescribed performance milestones have been achieved or are probable of being achieved . the remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to these equity awards at march 31 , 2012 is $ 3.6 million based on the company 2019s current assessment of probability of achieving the performance milestones . the weighted-average period over which this cost will be recognized is 2.1 years. .\nQuestion: what was the total value of the granted shares in 2012, in thousands of dollars?\nAnswer: 11004.91\nQuestion: and how much is that in dollars?\nAnswer: 11004910.0\nQuestion: in that same year, what was the amount of the equity awards in which the prescribed performance milestones were achieved, also in dollars?\nAnswer: 3300000.0\nQuestion: which one, then, is greater: the value of these equity awards or of those granted shares?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "yes" } ]
CONVFINQA303	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npolyplastics co. , ltd . polyplastics is a leading supplier of engineered plastics in the asia-pacific region and is a venture between daicel chemical industries ltd. , japan ( 55% ( 55 % ) ) and ticona llc ( 45% ( 45 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of cna holdings llc ) . polyplastics is a producer and marketer of pom and lcp , with principal production facilities located in japan , taiwan , malaysia and china . fortron industries llc . fortron is a leading global producer of polyphenylene sulfide ( \"pps\" ) , sold under the fortron ae brand , which is used in a wide variety of automotive and other applications , especially those requiring heat and/or chemical resistance . fortron is a limited liability company whose members are ticona fortron inc . ( 50% ( 50 % ) ownership and a wholly-owned subsidiary of cna holdings llc ) and kureha corporation ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) . fortron's facility is located in wilmington , north carolina . this venture combines the sales , marketing , distribution , compounding and manufacturing expertise of celanese with the pps polymer technology expertise of kureha . china acetate strategic ventures . we hold ownership interest in three separate acetate production ventures in china as follows : nantong cellulose fibers co . ltd . ( 31% ( 31 % ) ) , kunming cellulose fibers co . ltd . ( 30% ( 30 % ) ) and zhuhai cellulose fibers co . ltd . ( 30% ( 30 % ) ) . the china national tobacco corporation , the chinese state-owned tobacco entity , controls the remaining ownership interest in each of these ventures . our chinese acetate ventures fund their operations using operating cash flow and pay a dividend in the second quarter of each fiscal year based on the ventures' performance for the preceding year . in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , we received cash dividends of $ 83 million , $ 78 million and $ 71 million , respectively . during 2012 , our venture's nantong facility completed an expansion of its acetate flake and acetate tow capacity , each by 30000 tons . we made contributions of $ 29 million over three years related to the capacity expansion in nantong . similar expansions since the ventures were formed have led to earnings growth and increased dividends for the company . according to the euromonitor database services , china is estimated to have a 42% ( 42 % ) share of the world's 2011 cigarette consumption and is the fastest growing area for cigarette consumption at an estimated growth rate of 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) per year from 2011 through 2016 . combined , these ventures are a leader in chinese domestic acetate production and we believe we are well positioned to supply chinese cigarette producers . although our ownership interest in each of our china acetate ventures exceeds 20% ( 20 % ) , we account for these investments using the cost method of accounting because we determined that we cannot exercise significant influence over these entities due to local government investment in and influence over these entities , limitations on our involvement in the day-to-day operations and the present inability of the entities to provide timely financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states ( \"us gaap\" ) . 2022 other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv ventures are as follows : as of december 31 , 2012 ( in percentages ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>as of december 31 2012 ( in percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg</td><td>27</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr></table> raw materials and energy we purchase a variety of raw materials and energy from sources in many countries for use in our production processes . we have a policy of maintaining , when available , multiple sources of supply for materials . however , some of our individual plants may have single sources of supply for some of their raw materials , such as carbon monoxide , steam and acetaldehyde . although we have been able to obtain sufficient supplies of raw materials , there can be no assurance that unforeseen developments will not affect our raw material supply . even if we have multiple sources of supply for a raw material , there can be no assurance that these sources can make up for the loss of a major supplier . it is also possible profitability will be adversely affected if we are required to qualify additional sources of supply to our specifications in the event of the loss of a sole supplier . in addition , the price of raw materials varies , often substantially , from year to year. .\nQuestion: what is the net change in cash dividends received by the company from 2011 to 2012?\nAnswer: 5.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.0641" } ]
CONVFINQA8041	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 4 . the sum of the quarters 2019 earnings per common share may not equal the annual amounts due to the averaging effect of the number of shares and share equivalents throughout the year . 5 . during the fourth quarter of 2016 , net revenues included losses of approximately $ 60 million on sales and markdowns of legacy limited partnership investments in third-party-sponsored funds within the invest- ment management business segment . the fourth quarter of 2016 also included a $ 70 million provision within the wealth management busi- ness segment related to certain brokerage service reporting activities . employee share-based awards . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>2017 quarter first</td><td>2017 quarter second</td><td>2017 quarter third</td><td>2017 quarter fourth</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>discrete tax benefit</td><td>$ 112</td><td>$ 16</td><td>$ 11</td><td>$ 16</td></tr></table> 24 . subsequent events the firm has evaluated subsequent events for adjustment to or disclosure in the financial statements through the date of this report and has not identified any recordable or disclos- able events not otherwise reported in these financial state- ments or the notes thereto . 175 december 2017 form 10-k .\nQuestion: what is the total discrete tax benefit from employee share-based awards in the first quarter of 2017?\nAnswer: 112.0\nQuestion: what about the second quarter?\nAnswer: 16.0\nQuestion: what is the total for the first two quarters?\nAnswer: 128.0\nQuestion: what about the total if third quarter is added?\nAnswer: 139.0\nQuestion: what about the total for the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "155.0" } ]
CONVFINQA6727	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/28/02</td><td>1/3/04</td><td>1/1/05</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/30/06</td><td>12/29/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cadence design systems inc .</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.92</td><td>113.38</td><td>138.92</td><td>147.04</td><td>139.82</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s & p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.68</td><td>142.69</td><td>149.70</td><td>173.34</td><td>182.87</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>149.75</td><td>164.64</td><td>168.60</td><td>187.83</td><td>205.22</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s & p information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>147.23</td><td>150.99</td><td>152.49</td><td>165.32</td><td>192.28</td></tr></table> the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .\nQuestion: what was the stock price of cadence design systems in 2007?\nAnswer: 139.82\nQuestion: what was the price in 2006?\nAnswer: 147.04\nQuestion: what was the net change?\nAnswer: -7.22\nQuestion: what was the 2006 price?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "147.04" } ]
CONVFINQA1015	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nshareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five- year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2008 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2008 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 81 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 17 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 19 real estate companies and 23 banking companies . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s. , and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>state street corporation</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 111</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 105</td><td>$ 125</td><td>$ 198</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100</td><td>126</td><td>146</td><td>149</td><td>172</td><td>228</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100</td><td>117</td><td>132</td><td>109</td><td>141</td><td>191</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100</td><td>98</td><td>121</td><td>93</td><td>122</td><td>168</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the kbw bank index in 2011?\nAnswer: 93.0\nQuestion: and the starting value in 2008?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "100.0" } ]
CONVFINQA5129	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npage 74 notes to five year summary ( a ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) ) which , on a combined basis , increased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 173 million , $ 113 million after tax ( $ 0.25 per share ) . ( b ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 215 million , $ 154 million after tax ( $ 0.34 per share ) . also includes a reduction in income tax expense resulting from the closure of an internal revenue service examination of $ 144 million ( $ 0.32 per share ) . these items reduced earnings by $ 10 million after tax ( $ 0.02 per share ) . ( c ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments ( see the section , 201cresults of operations 201d in md&a ) which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 153 million , $ 102 million after tax ( $ 0.22 per share ) . ( d ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 1112 million , $ 632 million after tax ( $ 1.40 per share ) . in 2002 , the corporation adopted fas 142 which prohibits the amortization of goodwill . ( e ) includes the effects of items not considered in senior management 2019s assessment of the operating performance of the corporation 2019s business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased earnings from continuing operations before income taxes by $ 973 million , $ 651 million after tax ( $ 1.50 per share ) . also includes a gain from the disposal of a business and charges for the corporation 2019s exit from its global telecommunications services business which is included in discontinued operations and which , on a combined basis , increased the net loss by $ 1 billion ( $ 2.38 per share ) . ( f ) the corporation defines return on invested capital ( roic ) as net income plus after-tax interest expense divided by average invested capital ( stockholders 2019 equity plus debt ) , after adjusting stockholders 2019 equity by adding back the minimum pension liability . the adjustment to add back the minimum pension liability is a revision to our calculation in 2005 , which the corporation believes more closely links roic to management performance . further , the corporation believes that reporting roic provides investors with greater visibility into how effectively lockheed martin uses the capital invested in its operations . the corporation uses roic to evaluate multi-year investment decisions and as a long-term performance measure , and also uses roic as a factor in evaluating management performance under certain incentive compensation plans . roic is not a measure of financial performance under gaap , and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner . roic should not be considered in isola- tion or as an alternative to net earnings as an indicator of performance . the following calculations of roic reflect the revision to the calculation discussed above for all periods presented . ( in millions ) 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings</td><td>$ 1825</td><td>$ 1266</td><td>$ 1053</td><td>$ 500</td><td>$ -1046 ( 1046 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense ( multiplied by 65% ( 65 % ) ) 1</td><td>241</td><td>276</td><td>317</td><td>378</td><td>455</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>return</td><td>$ 2066</td><td>$ 1542</td><td>$ 1370</td><td>$ 878</td><td>$ -591 ( 591 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average debt2 5</td><td>$ 5077</td><td>$ 5932</td><td>$ 6612</td><td>$ 7491</td><td>$ 8782</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>average equity3 5</td><td>7590</td><td>7015</td><td>6170</td><td>6853</td><td>7221</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>average minimum pension liability3 4 5</td><td>1545</td><td>1296</td><td>1504</td><td>341</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>average invested capital</td><td>$ 14212</td><td>$ 14243</td><td>$ 14286</td><td>$ 14685</td><td>$ 16009</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>return on invested capital</td><td>14.5% ( 14.5 % )</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>9.6% ( 9.6 % )</td><td>6.0% ( 6.0 % )</td><td>( 3.7 ) % ( % )</td></tr></table> 1 represents after-tax interest expense utilizing the federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) . 2 debt consists of long-term debt , including current maturities , and short-term borrowings ( if any ) . 3 equity includes non-cash adjustments for other comprehensive losses , primarily for the additional minimum pension liability . 4 minimum pension liability values reflect the cumulative value of entries identified in our statement of stockholders equity under the caption 201cminimum pension liability . 201d the annual minimum pension liability adjustments to equity were : 2001 = ( $ 33 million ) ; 2002 = ( $ 1537 million ) ; 2003 = $ 331 million ; 2004 = ( $ 285 million ) ; 2005 = ( $ 105 million ) . as these entries are recorded in the fourth quarter , the value added back to our average equity in a given year is the cumulative impact of all prior year entries plus 20% ( 20 % ) of the cur- rent year entry value . 5 yearly averages are calculated using balances at the start of the year and at the end of each quarter . lockheed martin corporation .\nQuestion: what was the increase in earnings before taxes?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "173.0" } ]
CONVFINQA9982	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the company does not make any contributions to its postretirement plan other than funding benefits payments . the following table summarizes expected net benefit payments from the company 2019s general assets through 2019 : benefit payments expected subsidy receipts benefit payments . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>benefit payments</td><td>expected subsidy receipts</td><td>net benefit payments</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 2714</td><td>$ 71</td><td>$ 2643</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>3028</td><td>91</td><td>2937</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>3369</td><td>111</td><td>3258</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>3660</td><td>134</td><td>3526</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>4019</td><td>151</td><td>3868</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015 2013 2019</td><td>22686</td><td>1071</td><td>21615</td></tr></table> the company provides limited postemployment benefits to eligible former u.s . employees , primarily severance under a formal severance plan ( the 201cseverance plan 201d ) . the company accounts for severance expense by accruing the expected cost of the severance benefits expected to be provided to former employees after employment over their relevant service periods . the company updates the assumptions in determining the severance accrual by evaluating the actual severance activity and long-term trends underlying the assumptions . as a result of updating the assumptions , the company recorded incremental severance expense ( benefit ) related to the severance plan of $ 3471 , $ 2643 and $ ( 3418 ) , respectively , during the years 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . these amounts were part of total severance expenses of $ 135113 , $ 32997 and $ 21284 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . note 14 . debt on april 28 , 2008 , the company extended its committed unsecured revolving credit facility , dated as of april 28 , 2006 ( the 201ccredit facility 201d ) , for an additional year . the new expiration date of the credit facility is april 26 , 2011 . the available funding under the credit facility will remain at $ 2500000 through april 27 , 2010 and then decrease to $ 2000000 during the final year of the credit facility agreement . other terms and conditions in the credit facility remain unchanged . the company 2019s option to request that each lender under the credit facility extend its commitment was provided pursuant to the original terms of the credit facility agreement . borrowings under the facility are available to provide liquidity in the event of one or more settlement failures by mastercard international customers and , subject to a limit of $ 500000 , for general corporate purposes . the facility fee and borrowing cost are contingent upon the company 2019s credit rating . at december 31 , 2009 , the facility fee was 7 basis points on the total commitment , or approximately $ 1774 annually . interest on borrowings under the credit facility would be charged at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus an applicable margin of 28 basis points or an alternative base rate , and a utilization fee of 10 basis points would be charged if outstanding borrowings under the facility exceed 50% ( 50 % ) of commitments . at the inception of the credit facility , the company also agreed to pay upfront fees of $ 1250 and administrative fees of $ 325 , which are being amortized over five years . facility and other fees associated with the credit facility totaled $ 2222 , $ 2353 and $ 2477 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . mastercard was in compliance with the covenants of the credit facility and had no borrowings under the credit facility at december 31 , 2009 or december 31 , 2008 . the majority of credit facility lenders are members or affiliates of members of mastercard international . in june 1998 , mastercard international issued ten-year unsecured , subordinated notes ( the 201cnotes 201d ) paying a fixed interest rate of 6.67% ( 6.67 % ) per annum . mastercard repaid the entire principal amount of $ 80000 on june 30 , 2008 pursuant to the terms of the notes . the interest expense on the notes was $ 2668 and $ 5336 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .\nQuestion: what was the total of benefit payments in 2012?\nAnswer: 3369.0\nQuestion: and what was that in 2011?\nAnswer: 3028.0\nQuestion: how much, then, does the 2012 total represent in relation to this 2011 one?\nAnswer: 1.11262\nQuestion: and what is this value without the portion equivalent to the 2011 total?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.11262" } ]
CONVFINQA6804	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\npart ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2007 and 2006. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2007</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 41.31</td><td>$ 36.63</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>43.84</td><td>37.64</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>45.45</td><td>36.34</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>46.53</td><td>40.08</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2006</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 32.68</td><td>$ 26.66</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>35.75</td><td>27.35</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>36.92</td><td>29.98</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>38.74</td><td>35.21</td></tr></table> on february 29 , 2008 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 38.44 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 29 , 2008 , we had 395748826 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 528 registered holders . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to the securitization , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .\nQuestion: what was the price of common stock at closing on february 29, 2008?\nAnswer: 38.44\nQuestion: what was the high price of the stock in q4 2007?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "46.53" } ]
CONVFINQA3557	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nentergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increased recovery of deferred fuel and purchased power costs primarily due to an increase in april 2004 in the energy cost recovery rider and the true-ups to the 2003 and 2002 energy cost recovery rider filings . other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the over-recovery of grand gulf costs due to an increase in the grand gulf rider effective january 2004 . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy arkansas' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2002 net revenue</td><td>$ 1095.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>march 2002 settlement agreement</td><td>-154.0 ( 154.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-7.7 ( 7.7 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>asset retirement obligation</td><td>30.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>16.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>deferred fuel cost revisions</td><td>10.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>7.6</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 998.7</td></tr></table> the march 2002 settlement agreement resolved a request for recovery of ice storm costs incurred in december 2000 with an offset of those costs for funds contributed to pay for future stranded costs . a 1997 settlement provided for the collection of earnings in excess of an 11% ( 11 % ) return on equity in a transition cost account ( tca ) to offset stranded costs if retail open access were implemented . in mid- and late december 2000 , two separate ice storms left 226000 and 212500 entergy arkansas customers , respectively , without electric power in its service area . entergy arkansas filed a proposal to recover costs plus carrying charges associated with power restoration caused by the ice storms . entergy arkansas' final storm damage cost determination reflected costs of approximately $ 195 million . the apsc approved a settlement agreement submitted in march 2002 by entergy arkansas , the apsc staff , and the arkansas attorney general . in the march 2002 settlement , the parties agreed that $ 153 million of the ice storm costs would be classified as incremental ice storm expenses that can be offset against the tca on a rate class basis , and any excess of ice storm costs over the amount available in the tca would be deferred and amortized over 30 years , although such excess costs were not allowed to be included as a separate component of rate base . the allocated ice storm expenses exceeded the available tca funds by $ 15.8 million which was recorded as a regulatory asset in june 2002 . in accordance with the settlement agreement and following the apsc's approval of the 2001 earnings review related to the tca , entergy arkansas filed to return $ 18.1 million of the tca to certain large general service class customers that paid more into the tca than their allocation of storm costs . the apsc approved the return of funds to the large general service customer class in the form of refund checks in august 2002 . as part of the implementation of the march 2002 settlement agreement provisions , the tca procedure ceased with the 2001 earnings evaluation . of the remaining ice storm costs , $ 32.2 million was addressed through established ratemaking procedures , including $ 22.2 million classified as capital additions , while $ 3.8 million of the ice storm costs was not recovered through rates . the effect on net income of the march 2002 settlement agreement and 2001 earnings review was a $ 2.2 million increase in 2003 , because the decrease in net revenue was offset by the decrease in operation and maintenance expenses discussed below. .\nQuestion: what was the change in net revenue for entergy arkansas , inc. from 2002 to 2003, in millions?\nAnswer: -97.2\nQuestion: and how much does that change represent in relation to the net revenue for entergy arkansas , inc. in 2002?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "-0.08869" } ]
CONVFINQA9292	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nexcept for long-term debt , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s other financial instruments are measured at fair value or approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments . asset retirement obligations 2014the company records all known asset retirement obligations within other current liabilities for which the liability 2019s fair value can be reasonably estimated , including certain asbestos removal , asset decommissioning and contractual lease restoration obligations . the changes in the asset retirement obligation carrying amounts during 2011 , 2010 and 2009 were as follows : ( $ in millions ) retirement obligations . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>asset retirement obligations</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1 2009</td><td>$ 3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>payment of asset retirement obligation</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at december 31 2009</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>obligation relating to the future retirement of a facility</td><td>17</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>payment of asset retirement obligation</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>obligation relating to the future retirement of a facility</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>accretion expense</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>payment of asset retirement obligation</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>balance at december 31 2011</td><td>$ 25</td></tr></table> the company also has known conditional asset retirement obligations related to assets currently in use , such as certain asbestos remediation and asset decommissioning activities to be performed in the future , that were not reasonably estimable as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , due to insufficient information about the timing and method of settlement of the obligation . accordingly , the fair value of these obligations has not been recorded in the consolidated financial statements . environmental remediation and/or asset decommissioning of the relevant facilities may be required when the company ceases to utilize these facilities . in addition , there may be conditional environmental asset retirement obligations that the company has not yet discovered . income taxes 2014income tax expense and other income tax related information contained in the financial statements for periods before the spin-off are presented as if the company filed its own tax returns on a stand-alone basis , while similar information for periods after the spin-off reflect the company 2019s positions to be filed in its own tax returns in the future . income tax expense and other related information are based on the prevailing statutory rates for u.s . federal income taxes and the composite state income tax rate for the company for each period presented . state and local income and franchise tax provisions are allocable to contracts in process and , accordingly , are included in general and administrative expenses . deferred income taxes are recorded when revenues and expenses are recognized in different periods for financial statement purposes than for tax return purposes . deferred tax asset or liability account balances are calculated at the balance sheet date using current tax laws and rates in effect . determinations of the expected realizability of deferred tax assets and the need for any valuation allowances against these deferred tax assets were evaluated based upon the stand-alone tax attributes of the company , and an $ 18 million valuation allowance was deemed necessary as of december 31 , 2011 . no valuation allowance was deemed necessary as of december 31 , 2010 . uncertain tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold , based on the merits of the position , are recognized in the financial statements . we recognize the amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% ( 50 % ) likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority . if a tax position does not meet the minimum statutory threshold to avoid payment of penalties , we recognize an expense for the amount of the penalty in the period the tax position is claimed or expected to be claimed in our tax return . penalties , if probable and reasonably estimable , are recognized as a component of income tax expense . we also recognize accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense . the timing and amount of accrued interest is determined by the applicable tax law associated with an underpayment of income taxes . see note 12 : income taxes . under existing gaap , changes in accruals associated with uncertainties are recorded in earnings in the period they are determined. .\nQuestion: what is the total accretion expense of 2011 and 2010?\nAnswer: 0.0\nQuestion: then what is the total accretion expense if we also include 2009?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.0" } ]
CONVFINQA4923	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries item 9 . changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure there were no changes in or disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure during the last two years . item 9a . controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report , an evaluation was carried out by goldman sachs 2019 management , with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer , of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures ( as defined in rule 13a-15 ( e ) under the exchange act ) . based upon that evaluation , our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report . in addition , no change in our internal control over financial reporting ( as defined in rule 13a-15 ( f ) under the exchange act ) occurred during the fourth quarter of our year ended december 31 , 2018 that has materially affected , or is reasonably likely to materially affect , our internal control over financial reporting . management 2019s report on internal control over financial reporting and the report of independent registered public accounting firm are set forth in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 9b . other information not applicable . part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance information relating to our executive officers is included on page 20 of this form 10-k . information relating to our directors , including our audit committee and audit committee financial experts and the procedures by which shareholders can recommend director nominees , and our executive officers will be in our definitive proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of shareholders , which will be filed within 120 days of the end of 2018 ( 2019 proxy statement ) and is incorporated in this form 10-k by reference . information relating to our code of business conduct and ethics , which applies to our senior financial officers , is included in 201cbusiness 2014 available information 201d in part i , item 1 of this form 10-k . item 11 . executive compensation information relating to our executive officer and director compensation and the compensation committee of the board will be in the 2019 proxy statement and is incorporated in this form 10-k by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters information relating to security ownership of certain beneficial owners of our common stock and information relating to the security ownership of our management will be in the 2019 proxy statement and is incorporated in this form 10-k by reference . the table below presents information as of december 31 , 2018 regarding securities to be issued pursuant to outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) and securities remaining available for issuance under our equity compensation plans that were in effect during 2018 . plan category securities to be issued exercise of outstanding options and rights ( a ) weighted average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ) securities available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 17176475 n/a 68211649 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders 2013 2013 2013 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and rights ( a )</td><td>weighted average exercise price of outstanding options ( b )</td><td>securities available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>17176475</td><td>n/a</td><td>68211649</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by securityholders</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>17176475</td><td>-</td><td>68211649</td></tr></table> in the table above : 2030 securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and rights includes 17176475 shares that may be issued pursuant to outstanding rsus . these awards are subject to vesting and other conditions to the extent set forth in the respective award agreements , and the underlying shares will be delivered net of any required tax withholding . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were no outstanding options . 2030 shares underlying rsus are deliverable without the payment of any consideration , and therefore these awards have not been taken into account in calculating the weighted average exercise price . 196 goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k .\nQuestion: what is the total securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and rights?\nAnswer: 17176475.0\nQuestion: what about the total securities available for future issuance under equity compensation plans?\nAnswer: 68211649.0\nQuestion: what is the total number of securities that is approved by security holders?\nAnswer: 85388124.0\nQuestion: what portion of the approved securities is to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and rights?\nAnswer: 0.20116\nQuestion: what about the portion of approved securities available for future issuance under equity compensation plans?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.79884" } ]
CONVFINQA53	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\njpmorgan chase & co./2016 annual report 35 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in dollars )</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>jpmorgan chase</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 136.18</td><td>$ 186.17</td><td>$ 204.57</td><td>$ 221.68</td><td>$ 298.31</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>kbw bank index</td><td>100.00</td><td>133.03</td><td>183.26</td><td>200.42</td><td>201.40</td><td>258.82</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p financial index</td><td>100.00</td><td>128.75</td><td>174.57</td><td>201.06</td><td>197.92</td><td>242.94</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>115.99</td><td>153.55</td><td>174.55</td><td>176.95</td><td>198.10</td></tr></table> december 31 , ( in dollars ) .\nQuestion: what was the value of the kbw bank index in 2016?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "258.82" } ]
CONVFINQA9913	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nconsist of first and second liens , the charge-off amounts for the pool are proportionate to the composition of first and second liens in the pool . our experience has been that the ratio of first to second lien loans has been consistent over time and is appropriately represented in our pools used for roll-rate calculations . generally , our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period , followed by a 20 year amortization term . during the draw period , we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay interest only and home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay principal and interest . based upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2012 , the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end . table 39 : home equity lines of credit 2013 draw period end in millions interest product principal interest product . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>interestonlyproduct</td><td>principalandinterestproduct</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 1338</td><td>$ 221</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>2048</td><td>475</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>2024</td><td>654</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>1571</td><td>504</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2017</td><td>3075</td><td>697</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2018 and thereafter</td><td>5497</td><td>4825</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total ( a )</td><td>$ 15553</td><td>$ 7376</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes approximately $ 166 million , $ 208 million , $ 213 million , $ 61 million , $ 70 million and $ 526 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments with draw periods scheduled to end in 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , 2017 and 2018 and thereafter , respectively . we view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only , as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments . based upon outstanding balances , and excluding purchased impaired loans , at december 31 , 2012 , for home equity lines of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw ( e.g. , draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated ) , approximately 3.86% ( 3.86 % ) were 30-89 days past due and approximately 5.96% ( 5.96 % ) were greater than or equal to 90 days past due . generally , when a borrower becomes 60 days past due , we terminate borrowing privileges , and those privileges are not subsequently reinstated . at that point , we continue our collection/recovery processes , which may include a loss mitigation loan modification resulting in a loan that is classified as a tdr . see note 5 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . loan modifications and troubled debt restructurings consumer loan modifications we modify loans under government and pnc-developed programs based upon our commitment to help eligible homeowners and borrowers avoid foreclosure , where appropriate . initially , a borrower is evaluated for a modification under a government program . if a borrower does not qualify under a government program , the borrower is then evaluated under a pnc program . our programs utilize both temporary and permanent modifications and typically reduce the interest rate , extend the term and/or defer principal . temporary and permanent modifications under programs involving a change to loan terms are generally classified as tdrs . further , certain payment plans and trial payment arrangements which do not include a contractual change to loan terms may be classified as tdrs . additional detail on tdrs is discussed below as well as in note 5 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . a temporary modification , with a term between three and 60 months , involves a change in original loan terms for a period of time and reverts to a calculated exit rate for the remaining term of the loan as of a specific date . a permanent modification , with a term greater than 60 months , is a modification in which the terms of the original loan are changed . permanent modifications primarily include the government-created home affordable modification program ( hamp ) or pnc-developed hamp-like modification programs . for consumer loan programs , such as residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines , we will enter into a temporary modification when the borrower has indicated a temporary hardship and a willingness to bring current the delinquent loan balance . examples of this situation often include delinquency due to illness or death in the family , or a loss of employment . permanent modifications are entered into when it is confirmed that the borrower does not possess the income necessary to continue making loan payments at the current amount , but our expectation is that payments at lower amounts can be made . residential mortgage and home equity loans and lines have been modified with changes in terms for up to 60 months , although the majority involve periods of three to 24 months . we also monitor the success rates and delinquency status of our loan modification programs to assess their effectiveness in serving our customers 2019 needs while mitigating credit losses . the following tables provide the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified consumer real estate related loans as well as the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified loans that were 60 days or more past due as of six months , nine months , twelve months and fifteen months after the modification date . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 91 .\nQuestion: what percentage of the total of the interest only products home equity lines of credit draw periods is represented by the ones scheduled to end in 2017?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.19771" } ]
CONVFINQA950	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\ncdw corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 denominator was impacted by the common shares issued during both the ipo and the underwriters 2019 exercise in full of the overallotment option granted to them in connection with the ipo . because such common shares were issued on july 2 , 2013 and july 31 , 2013 , respectively , they are only partially reflected in the 2013 denominator . such shares will be fully reflected in the 2014 denominator . see note 9 for additional discussion of the ipo . the dilutive effect of outstanding restricted stock , restricted stock units , stock options and mpk plan units is reflected in the denominator for diluted earnings per share using the treasury stock method . the following is a reconciliation of basic shares to diluted shares: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted-average shares - basic</td><td>156.6</td><td>145.1</td><td>144.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of dilutive securities</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.7</td><td>0.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average shares - diluted</td><td>158.7</td><td>145.8</td><td>144.9</td></tr></table> for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , diluted earnings per share excludes the impact of 0.0 million , 0.0 million , and 4.3 million potential common shares , respectively , as their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect . 12 . deferred compensation plan on march 10 , 2010 , in connection with the company 2019s purchase of $ 28.5 million principal amount of its outstanding senior subordinated debt , the company established the restricted debt unit plan ( the 201crdu plan 201d ) , an unfunded nonqualified deferred compensation plan . the total number of rdus that can be granted under the rdu plan is 28500 . at december 31 , 2013 , 28500 rdus were outstanding . rdus that are outstanding vest daily on a pro rata basis over the three-year period from january 1 , 2012 ( or , if later , the date of hire or the date of a subsequent rdu grant ) through december 31 , 2014 . participants have no rights to the underlying debt . the total amount of compensation available to be paid under the rdu plan was initially to be based on two components , a principal component and an interest component . the principal component credits the rdu plan with a notional amount equal to the $ 28.5 million face value of the senior subordinated notes ( the 201cdebt pool 201d ) , together with certain redemption premium equivalents as noted below . the interest component credits the rdu plan with amounts equal to the interest that would have been earned on the debt pool from march 10 , 2010 through maturity on october 12 , 2017 , except as discussed below . interest amounts for 2010 and 2011 were deferred until 2012 , and thereafter , interest amounts were paid to participants semi-annually on the interest payment due dates . payments totaling $ 1.7 million and $ 1.3 million were made to participants under the rdu plan in april and october 2013 , respectively , in connection with the semi-annual interest payments due . the company used a portion of the ipo proceeds together with incremental borrowings to redeem $ 324.0 million of the total senior subordinated notes outstanding on august 1 , 2013 . in connection with the ipo and the partial redemption of the senior subordinated notes , the company amended the rdu plan to increase the retentive value of the plan . in accordance with the original terms of the rdu plan , the principal component of the rdus converted to a cash-denominated pool upon the redemption of the senior subordinated notes . in addition , the company added $ 1.4 million to the principal component in the year ended december 31 , 2013 as redemption premium equivalents in accordance with the terms of the rdu plan . under the terms of the amended rdu plan , upon the partial redemption of outstanding senior subordinated notes , the rdus ceased to accrue the proportionate related interest component credits . the .\nQuestion: what was the total of semi-annual interest payments in april 2013?\nAnswer: 1.7\nQuestion: and in october 2013?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1.3" } ]
CONVFINQA1590	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 164 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report firm ) is required to hold more than the additional 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) of tier 1 common . in addition , basel iii establishes a 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) tier i common equity standard for the definition of 201cwell capitalized 201d under the prompt corrective action ( 201cpca 201d ) requirements of the fdic improvement act ( 201cfdicia 201d ) . the tier i common equity standard is effective from the first quarter of 2015 . the following chart presents the basel iii minimum risk-based capital ratios during the transitional periods and on a fully phased-in basis . the chart also includes management 2019s target for the firm 2019s tier 1 common ratio . it is the firm 2019s current expectation that its basel iii tier 1 common ratio will exceed the regulatory minimums , both during the transition period and upon full implementation in 2019 and thereafter . the firm estimates that its tier 1 common ratio under the basel iii advanced approach on a fully phased-in basis would be 9.5% ( 9.5 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 , achieving management 2019s previously stated objectives . the tier 1 common ratio as calculated under the basel iii standardized approach is estimated at 9.4% ( 9.4 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 . the tier 1 common ratio under both basel i and basel iii are non-gaap financial measures . however , such measures are used by bank regulators , investors and analysts to assess the firm 2019s capital position and to compare the firm 2019s capital to that of other financial services companies . the following table presents a comparison of the firm 2019s tier 1 common under basel i rules to its estimated tier 1 common under the advanced approach of the basel iii rules , along with the firm 2019s estimated risk-weighted assets . key differences in the calculation of rwa between basel i and basel iii advanced approach include : ( 1 ) basel iii credit risk rwa is based on risk-sensitive approaches which largely rely on the use of internal credit models and parameters , whereas basel i rwa is based on fixed supervisory risk- weightings which vary only by counterparty type and asset class ; and ( 2 ) basel iii includes rwa for operational risk , whereas basel i does not . operational risk capital takes into consideration operational losses in the quarter following the period in which those losses were realized , and the calculation generally incorporates such losses irrespective of whether the issues or business activity giving rise to the losses have been remediated or reduced . the firm 2019s operational risk capital model continues to be refined in conjunction with the firm 2019s basel iii advanced approach parallel run . as a result of model enhancements in 2013 , as well as taking into consideration the legal expenses incurred by the firm in 2013 , the firm 2019s operational risk capital increased substantially in 2013 over 2012 . tier 1 common under basel iii includes additional adjustments and deductions not included in basel i tier 1 common , such as the inclusion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( 201caoci 201d ) related to afs securities and defined benefit pension and other postretirement employee benefit ( 201copeb 201d ) plans . december 31 , 2013 ( in millions , except ratios ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>tier 1 common under basel i rules</td><td>$ 148887</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>adjustments related to aoci for afs securities and defined benefit pension and opeb plans</td><td>1474</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>add back of basel i deductions ( a )</td><td>1780</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>deduction for deferred tax asset related to net operating loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards</td><td>-741 ( 741 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>all other adjustments</td><td>-198 ( 198 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules</td><td>$ 151202</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii advanced approach ( b )</td><td>$ 1590873</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii advanced approach ( c )</td><td>9.5% ( 9.5 % )</td></tr></table> estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii advanced approach ( b ) $ 1590873 estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii advanced approach ( c ) 9.5% ( 9.5 % ) ( a ) certain exposures , which are deducted from capital under basel i , are risked-weighted under basel iii. .\nQuestion: in december, 2013, how much did the estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii advanced approach represent in relation to the estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules?\nAnswer: 10.52151\nQuestion: and as of that same date, what was the total of adjustments related to aoci for afs securities and defined benefit pension and opeb plans?\nAnswer: 1474.0\nQuestion: what was that total for the add back of basel i deductions?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "1780.0" } ]
CONVFINQA2459	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nthe following tables present a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) for 2017 and 2016 , respectively: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>level 3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1 2017</td><td>$ 140</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>actual return on assets</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements net</td><td>136</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31 2017</td><td>$ 278</td></tr></table> purchases , issuances and settlements , net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( 4 ) balance as of december 31 , 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 140 the company 2019s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts . the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust . in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the company . the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation . considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity needs , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns . strategies to address the goal of ensuring sufficient assets to pay benefits include target allocations to a broad array of asset classes and , within asset classes , strategies are employed to provide adequate returns , diversification and liquidity . in 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the american water pension plan after conducting an asset-liability study to reduce the volatility of the funded status of the plan . as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed-income assets relative to liabilities . the fixed income portion of the portfolio was designed to match the bond-like and long-dated nature of the postretirement liabilities . in 2017 , the company further increased its exposure to liability-driven investing and increased its fixed-income allocation to 50% ( 50 % ) , up from 40% ( 40 % ) , in an effort to further decrease the funded status volatility of the plan and hedge the portfolio from movements in interest rates . in 2012 , the company also implemented a de-risking strategy for the medical bargaining trust within the plan to minimize volatility . in 2017 , the company conducted a new asset-liability study that indicated medical trend inflation that outpaced the consumer price index by more than 2% ( 2 % ) for the last 20 years . given continuously rising medical costs , the company decided to increase the equity exposure of the portfolio to 30% ( 30 % ) , up from 20% ( 20 % ) , while reducing the fixed-income portion of the portfolio from 80% ( 80 % ) to 70% ( 70 % ) . the company also conducted an asset-liability study for the post-retirement non-bargaining medical plan . its allocation was adjusted to make it more conservative , reducing the equity allocation from 70% ( 70 % ) to 60% ( 60 % ) and increasing the fixed- income allocation from 30% ( 30 % ) to 40% ( 40 % ) . the post-retirement medical non-bargaining plan 2019s equity allocation was reduced due to the cap on benefits for some non-union participants and resultant reduction in the plan 2019s liabilities . these changes will take place in 2018 . the company engages third party investment managers for all invested assets . managers are not permitted to invest outside of the asset class ( e.g . fixed income , equity , alternatives ) or strategy for which they have been appointed . investment management agreements and recurring performance and attribution analysis are used as tools to ensure investment managers invest solely within the investment strategy they have been provided . futures and options may be used to adjust portfolio duration to align with a plan 2019s targeted investment policy. .\nQuestion: what was the change in the balance throughout 2017?\nAnswer: 138.0\nQuestion: and how much does this change represent in relation to that balance at the beginning of the year?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "0.98571" } ]
CONVFINQA1588	[ { "role": "human", "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 164 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report firm ) is required to hold more than the additional 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) of tier 1 common . in addition , basel iii establishes a 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) tier i common equity standard for the definition of 201cwell capitalized 201d under the prompt corrective action ( 201cpca 201d ) requirements of the fdic improvement act ( 201cfdicia 201d ) . the tier i common equity standard is effective from the first quarter of 2015 . the following chart presents the basel iii minimum risk-based capital ratios during the transitional periods and on a fully phased-in basis . the chart also includes management 2019s target for the firm 2019s tier 1 common ratio . it is the firm 2019s current expectation that its basel iii tier 1 common ratio will exceed the regulatory minimums , both during the transition period and upon full implementation in 2019 and thereafter . the firm estimates that its tier 1 common ratio under the basel iii advanced approach on a fully phased-in basis would be 9.5% ( 9.5 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 , achieving management 2019s previously stated objectives . the tier 1 common ratio as calculated under the basel iii standardized approach is estimated at 9.4% ( 9.4 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 . the tier 1 common ratio under both basel i and basel iii are non-gaap financial measures . however , such measures are used by bank regulators , investors and analysts to assess the firm 2019s capital position and to compare the firm 2019s capital to that of other financial services companies . the following table presents a comparison of the firm 2019s tier 1 common under basel i rules to its estimated tier 1 common under the advanced approach of the basel iii rules , along with the firm 2019s estimated risk-weighted assets . key differences in the calculation of rwa between basel i and basel iii advanced approach include : ( 1 ) basel iii credit risk rwa is based on risk-sensitive approaches which largely rely on the use of internal credit models and parameters , whereas basel i rwa is based on fixed supervisory risk- weightings which vary only by counterparty type and asset class ; and ( 2 ) basel iii includes rwa for operational risk , whereas basel i does not . operational risk capital takes into consideration operational losses in the quarter following the period in which those losses were realized , and the calculation generally incorporates such losses irrespective of whether the issues or business activity giving rise to the losses have been remediated or reduced . the firm 2019s operational risk capital model continues to be refined in conjunction with the firm 2019s basel iii advanced approach parallel run . as a result of model enhancements in 2013 , as well as taking into consideration the legal expenses incurred by the firm in 2013 , the firm 2019s operational risk capital increased substantially in 2013 over 2012 . tier 1 common under basel iii includes additional adjustments and deductions not included in basel i tier 1 common , such as the inclusion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( 201caoci 201d ) related to afs securities and defined benefit pension and other postretirement employee benefit ( 201copeb 201d ) plans . december 31 , 2013 ( in millions , except ratios ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>tier 1 common under basel i rules</td><td>$ 148887</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>adjustments related to aoci for afs securities and defined benefit pension and opeb plans</td><td>1474</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>add back of basel i deductions ( a )</td><td>1780</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>deduction for deferred tax asset related to net operating loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards</td><td>-741 ( 741 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>all other adjustments</td><td>-198 ( 198 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules</td><td>$ 151202</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii advanced approach ( b )</td><td>$ 1590873</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii advanced approach ( c )</td><td>9.5% ( 9.5 % )</td></tr></table> estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii advanced approach ( b ) $ 1590873 estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii advanced approach ( c ) 9.5% ( 9.5 % ) ( a ) certain exposures , which are deducted from capital under basel i , are risked-weighted under basel iii. .\nQuestion: in december, 2013, how much did the estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii advanced approach represent in relation to the estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules?\n" }, { "role": "agent", "content": "10.52151" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.