RoutingBench-V2 / docs /EVALUATION.md
TrangBui's picture
Release RoutingBench V2.0.0-beta.1
2527e91 verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
1.67 kB

Evaluation Protocol

Router boundary

A router may receive only the public task, observable state, public task context, execution memory, recent events, budget, qualitative agent profiles, and candidate action identifiers. It must not receive admissible/progress/efficient labels, transition definitions, action outcomes, or hidden simulator state.

Track A

For each row in the decision configuration, construct the public observation and request one action. The primary outcome is membership in admissible_actions.

Report at least:

  • admissible next-action accuracy;
  • macro template admissible accuracy;
  • ambiguous-state accuracy;
  • post-failure and post-rejection accuracy;
  • counterfactual-pair accuracy;
  • STOP precision and recall;
  • distractor selection and efficient-action rates.

Track B

For each row in the interactive configuration, start from the initial state and run the router against the deterministic simulator until a terminal condition.

Report at least:

  • goal completion rate;
  • macro template completion rate;
  • admissible and efficient action rates;
  • recovery success;
  • action rejection and stagnant-repeat rates;
  • loop and premature-STOP rates;
  • step and cost regret on successful episodes.

Ablations

Use the same model, provider, seed, dataset revision, and split when comparing:

  • naive: minimal instruction, role name/goal only, no guard;
  • structured: full role contracts, failure-aware instruction, observable rejection-repeat guard.

This two-arm comparison measures the complete orchestration-engineering package. Additional factorial arms are required to attribute gains to individual elements.