Datasets:
id
int64 | webcast_id
string | hearing_title
string | hearing_date
string | hearing_type
string | application_number
list | case_id
string | case_name
string | case_url
string | ecli
string | type
string | document_date
string | importance
int64 | articles
list | respondent_government
list | issue
string | strasbourg_caselaw
string | external_sources
string | conclusion
string | separate_opinion
string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0
|
1021112_29112017
|
Ilnseher v. Germany (nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14)
|
2017-11-29 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"10211/12"
] |
001-139684
|
ILNSEHER v. GERMANY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-139684
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
| 4
|
[
"5",
"5-1",
"5-1-a",
"6",
"6-1",
"7",
"7-1"
] |
[
"DEU"
] | |||||||
1
|
1021112_29112017
|
Ilnseher v. Germany (nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14)
|
2017-11-29 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"27505/14"
] |
001-150507
|
ILNSEHER v. GERMANY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-150507
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
| 4
|
[
"5",
"5-1-e",
"6",
"6-1",
"7",
"7-1"
] |
[
"DEU"
] |
Communicated
| ||||||
2
|
1021112_29112017
|
Ilnseher v. Germany (nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14)
|
2017-11-29 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"10211/12",
"27505/14"
] |
001-170653
|
CASE OF ILNSEHER v. GERMANY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170653
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0202JUD001021112
|
CHAMBER
|
2017-02-02 00:00:00
| 4
|
[
"5",
"5-1",
"5-4",
"6",
"6-1",
"7",
"7-1"
] |
[
"DEU"
] |
No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Heavier penalty);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal)
|
FALSE
|
|||
3
|
1021112_29112017
|
Ilnseher v. Germany (nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14)
|
2017-11-29 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"10211/12",
"27505/14"
] |
001-187540
|
CASE OF ILNSEHER v. GERMANY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187540
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1204JUD001021112
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2018-12-04 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"5",
"5-1",
"5-1-a",
"5-1-c",
"5-1-e",
"5-4",
"6",
"6-1",
"7",
"7-1",
"41"
] |
[
"DEU"
] |
Section 316f §§ 2 and 3 of the Introductory Act to the Criminal Code ; Preventive Detention (Distinction) Act ; Bavarian Preventive Detention Execution Act ; Sections 7(2) and 105(1) of the Juvenile Courts Act ; Sections 1(1) and 4 of the Therapy Detention Act ; Articles 63, 66 and 67d § 2 of the Criminal Code ; Basic Law
|
Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809/08, § 78, 21 June 2016;Aurnhammer v. Germany (dec.), no. 36356/10, § 35, 21 October 2014;B. v. Germany, no. 61272/09, § 68, 19 April 2012;Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, ECHR 2000 III;Bergmann v. Germany, no. 23279/14, 7 January 2016;Biziuk v. Poland (no. 2), no. 24580/06, § 47, 17 January 2012;Brand v. the Netherlands, no. 49902/99, § 62, 11 May 2004;C.B. v. Romania, no. 21207/03, 20 April 2010;Del Río Prada v. Spain [GC], no. 42750/09, ECHR 2013;Erkalo v. the Netherlands, 2 September 1998, § 52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VI;Fešar v. the Czech Republic, no. 76576/01, § 68, 13 November 2008;Frasik v. Poland, no. 22933/02, § 63, ECHR 2010 (extracts);G. v. Germany, no. 65210/09, §§ 70 et seq., 7 June 2012;G.B. v. Switzerland, no. 27426/95, §§ 27 and 32-39, 30 November 2000;Glien v. Germany, no. 7345/12, 28 November 2013;Göç v. Turkey [GC], no. 36590/97, §§ 36-37, ECHR 2002 V;H.L. v. the United Kingdom, no. 45508/99, § 98, ECHR 2004 IX;H.W. v. Germany, no. 17167/11, §§ 107 and 113, 19 September 2013;Hutchison Reid v. the United Kingdom, no. 50272/99, ECHR 2003 IV;Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 154, 22 May 2012;Ilnseher v. Germany, nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14, 2 February 2017;Jamil v. France, 8 June 1995, § 30, Series A no. 317 B;Jendrowiak v. Germany, no. 30060/04, § 35, 14 April 2011;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, §§ 140-141, ECHR 2001 VII;K. v. Germany, no. 61827/09, §§ 79 et seq., 7 June 2012;Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, ECHR 2008;Karamanof v. Greece, no. 46372/09, § 42, 26 July 2011;Kharin v. Russia, no. 37345/03, § 31, 3 February 2011;Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, § 124, ECHR 2006 XII (extracts);Klinkenbuß v. Germany, no. 53157/11, § 48, 25 February 2016;Lebedev v. Russia, no. 4493/04, §§ 96-102, 25 October 2007;Luberti v. Italy, 23 February 1984, § 28, Series A no. 75;M. v. Germany, no. 19359/04, ECHR 2009;Mercan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 56511/16, § 24, 8 November 2016;Mooren v. Germany [GC], no. 11364/03, § 106, 9 July 2009;Muršić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, §§ 136 et seq., ECHR 2016;Musiał v. Poland [GC], no. 24557/94, § 47, ECHR 1999 II;Navarra v. France, 23 November 1993, § 28, Series A no. 273 B;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358/12, § 84, 24 January 2017;Petschulies v. Germany, no. 6281/13, 2 June 2016;Piotr Baranowski v. Poland, no. 39742/05, §§ 63-64, 2 October 2007;R.M.D. v. Switzerland, 26 September 1997, § 42, Reports 1997 VI;Rakevich v. Russia, no. 58973/00, § 26, 28 October 2003;Reiner v. Germany, no. 28527/08, § 83, 19 January 2012;Ruiz Rivera v. Switzerland, no. 8300/06, § 59, 18 February 2014;S. v. Germany, no. 3300/10, § 81, 28 June 2012;S.T.S. v. the Netherlands, no. 277/05, § 43, ECHR 2011;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13229/03, § 67, ECHR 2008;Sabeva v. Bulgaria, no. 44290/07, § 58, 10 June 2010;Şahin Alpay v. Turkey, no. 16538/17, § 137, ECHR 2018;Schmitz v. Germany, no. 30493/04, 9 June 2011;Shcherbina v. Russia, no. 41970/11, 26 June 2014;Shimovolos v. Russia, no. 30194/09, § 51, 21 June 2011;Simeonovi v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 21980/04, § 83, 12 May 2017;Sisojeva and Others v. Latvia (striking out) [GC], no. 60654/00, § 61, ECHR 2007 I;Smatana v. the Czech Republic, no. 18642/04, 27 September 2007;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 143 & 145, ECHR 2012,;Stephens v. Malta (no. 2), no. 33740/06, § 84, 21 April 2009;Ťupa v. the Czech Republic, no. 39822/07, § 47, 26 May 2011;V.K. v. Russia, no. 9139/08, § 30, 4 April 2017;Van der Velden v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 29514/05, ECHR 2006 XV;Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/96, §§ 46- 47, ECHR 2000 X;Vogt v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 45553/06, § 36, 3 June 2014;W.P. v. Germany, no. 55594/13, § 49, 6 October 2016;Welch v. the United Kingdom, 9 February 1995, Series A no. 307 A;Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33;Witek v. Poland, no. 13453/07, § 41, 21 December 2010;Žúbor v. Slovakia, no. 7711/06, § 89, 6 December 2011
|
No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind);No violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Heavier penalty;Retroactivity);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal)
|
TRUE
|
|
4
|
1051110_14012015
|
Murray v. the Netherlands (no. 10511/10)
|
2015-01-14 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"10511/10"
] |
001-138893
|
CASE OF MURRAY v. THE NETHERLANDS
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-138893
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1210JUD001051110
|
CHAMBER
|
2013-12-10 00:00:00
| 4
|
[
"3"
] |
[
"NLD"
] |
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect)
|
FALSE
|
|||
5
|
1051110_14012015
|
Murray v. the Netherlands (no. 10511/10)
|
2015-01-14 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"10511/10"
] |
001-162614
|
CASE OF MURRAY v. THE NETHERLANDS
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-162614
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0426JUD001051110
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2016-04-26 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"3",
"34",
"41"
] |
[
"NLD"
] |
A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455/05, § 128, ECHR 2009;Aerts v. Belgium, 30 July 1998, § 66, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-V;Bodein v. France, no. 40014/10, § 61, 13 November 2014;Carrella v. Italy, no. 33955/07, §§ 48-51, 9 September 2014;Creangă v. Romania [GC], no. 29226/03, § 130, 23 February 2012;Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362/04, § 28, ECHR 2007 V;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 123, ECHR 2010;Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos. 15018/11 and 61199/12, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Herczegfalvy v. Austria, 24 September 1992, § 82, Series A no. 244;James, Wells and Lee v. the United Kingdom, nos. 25119/09, 57715/09 and 57877/09, 18 September 2012;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, ECHR 2001 VII;Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, ECHR 2008;Khoroshenko v. Russia [GC], no. 41418/04, §§ 121 and 144 145, ECHR 2015;Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 94, ECHR 2000 XI;Larionovs and Tess v. Latvia (dec.), nos. 45520/04 and 19363/05, § 172, 25 November 2014;László Magyar v. Hungary, no. 73593/10, 20 May 2014;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696/09, § 418, ECHR 2011;Maiorano and Others v. Italy, no. 28634/06, §§ 115 122, 15 December 2009;Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no. 33071/96, ECHR 2000 XII;Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703/97, § 72, ECHR 2002 VIII;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593/08, § 128, ECHR 2012;Naumenko v. Ukraine, no. 42023/98, § 112, 10 February 2004;Öcalan v. Turkey (no. 2), nos. 24069/03, 197/04, 6201/06 and 10464/07, § 203, 18 March 2014;Raffray Taddei v. France, no. 36435/07, 21 December 2010;Sławomir Musiał v. Poland, no. 28300/06, § 87, 20 January 2009;Trabelsi v. Belgium, no. 140/10, § 137, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Vinter and Others v. the United Kingdom, [GC], nos. 66069/09, 130/10 and 3896/10, ECHR 2013 (extracts)
|
Report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to Aruba and the Netherlands Antilles in 2007
|
Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 34 - Locus standi;Victim);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
|
6
|
1061316_23052017
|
Sharxhi and Others v. Albania (no. 10613/16)
|
2017-05-23 00:00:00
|
Chamber hearing
|
[
"10613/16"
] |
001-162869
|
SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-162869
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
| 4
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"8",
"8-1",
"13",
"14",
"P1-1"
] |
[
"ALB"
] |
Communicated
| ||||||
7
|
1061316_23052017
|
Sharxhi and Others v. Albania (no. 10613/16)
|
2017-05-23 00:00:00
|
Chamber hearing
|
[
"10613/16"
] |
001-179867
|
CASE OF SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179867
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0111JUD001061316
|
CHAMBER
|
2018-01-11 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"13",
"13+6-1",
"13+8",
"13+P1-1",
"35",
"35-1",
"35-3-a",
"41",
"P1-1",
"P1-1-1"
] |
[
"ALB"
] |
Non Contractual Liability of the State Act (Law no. 8510 of 15 July 1999) ; Inspection of Buildings Act (Law no. 9780 of 16 July 2007) ; Civil Code
|
Akkuş v. Turkey, 9 July 1997, § 29, Reports 1997-IV;Almeida Garrett, Mascarenhas Falcão and Others v. Portugal, nos. 29813/96 and 30229/96, § 54, ECHR 2000 I;Apostol v. Georgia, no. 40765/02, §§ 64-65, ECHR 2006‑XI;Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131;Brumărescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, §§ 76-78, ECHR 1999 VII;Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 33509/04, § 68, ECHR 2009;Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 35, ECHR 2002 III;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433/09, § 82, ECHR 2012;Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 29, ECHR 2000‑IV;Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium (Article 50), 10 March 1972, §§ 15 16, Series A no. 14;Delijorgji v. Albania, no. 6858/11, § 100, 28 April 2015;Demades v. Turkey, no. 16219/90, 31 July 2003;Driza v. Albania, no. 33771/02, §§ 119-120, ECHR 2007 V (extracts);Fleri Soler and Camilleri v. Malta, no. 35349/05, § 65, 26 September 2006;Frendo Randon and Others v. Malta, no. 2226/10, 22 November 2011;Gjyli v. Albania, no. 32907/07, §§ 55-61, 29 September 2009;Guiso-Gallisay v. Italy (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 58858/00, 22 December 2009;Hornsby v. Greece, 19 March 1997, § 40, Reports 1997 II;Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no. 31107/96, § 66, ECHR 1999 II;Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 49, ECHR 1999-V;Jahn and Others v. Germany [GC], nos. 46720/99, 72203/01 and 72552/01, §§ 91-94, ECHR 2005-VI;James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, § 37, Series A no. 98;Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, § 106, Reports 1998 I;Khalikova v. Azerbaijan, no. 42883/11, §§ 128-129, 22 October 2015;Kolona v. Cyprus, no. 28025/03, §§ 70-78, 27 September 2007;Kozacıoğlu v. Turkey [GC], no. 2334/03, 19 February 2009;Kübler v. Germany, no. 32715/06, §§ 60-66, 13 January 2011;Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 31210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-XI;Loizidou v. Turkey (merits), no. 15318/89, 18 December 1996, Reports 1996 VI;Luli and Others v. Albania, nos. 64480/09 and 5 others, §§ 77-84 and §§ 114-119, 1 April 2014;Manushaqe Puto and Others v. Albania, nos. 604/07 and 3 others, §§ 33-35, 31 July 2012;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056/06, §§ 87-89, ECHR 2009;Mikheyev v. Russia, no. 77617/01, § 155, 26 January 2006;Montanaro Gauci and Others v. Malta, no. 31454/12, §§ 41-48, 30 August 2016;Mullai and Others v. Albania (just satisfaction – striking out), no. 9074/07, § 18, 18 October 2011;O’Keeffe v. Ireland [GC], no. 35810/09, §§ 109-111, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Okyay and Others v. Turkey, no. 36220/97, ECHR 2005 VII;Oliari and Others v. Italy, nos. 18766/11 and 36030/11, § 78, 21 July 2015;Öneryıldız v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, ECHR 2004 XII;Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece, 24 June 1993, Series A no. 260 B;Paplauskienė v. Lithuania, no. 31102/06, § 51, 14 October 2014;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358/12, § 169, ECHR 2017;Pavić v. Croatia, no. 21846/08, § 38, 28 January 2010;Sabanchiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 38450/05, § 153, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Salah v. the Netherlands, no. 8196/02, §§ 65-67, ECHR 2006 IX (extracts);Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan [GC], no. 40167/06, § 217, ECHR 2015;Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, ECHR 2006 V;Serghides and Christoforou v. Cyprus (just satisfaction), no. 44730/98, § 29, 12 June 2003;Serkov v. Ukraine, no. 39766/05, § 33, 7 July 2011;Serrilli v. Italy (just satisfaction), no. 77822/01, § 17, 17 July 2008;Silva Barreira Júnior v. Portugal, nos. 38317/06 and 38319/06, § 40, 11 January 2011;Société Colas Est and Others v. France, no. 37971/97, § § 41-42, ECHR 2002 III;Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, §§ 63 and 69-74, Series A no. 52;The Holy Monasteries v. Greece, 9 December 1994, § 71, Series A no. 301-A;Urbárska Obec Trenčianske Biskupice v. Slovakia, no. 74258/01, § 115, ECHR 2007-XIII;Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 108, ECHR 2001-V;Zollmann v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62902/00, ECHR 2003-XII
|
Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 13+6-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 6-1 - Access to court;Fair hearing;Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Right to a fair trial);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Fair hearing);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for home);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8-2 - Interference;In accordance with the law;Article 8-1 - Respect for home;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Violation of Article 13+P1-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Prescribed by law;Interference;Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property);Violation of Article 13+P1-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Interference;Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Deprivation of property;Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
FALSE
|
|
8
|
1086509_02102013
|
Mocanu and Others v. Romania (nos 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08)
|
2013-10-02 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"10865/09",
"45886/07",
"32431/08"
] |
001-114752
|
CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-114752
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD001086509
|
CHAMBER
|
2012-11-13 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"2",
"2-1",
"3",
"6",
"6-1",
"35",
"41"
] |
[
"ROU"
] |
Association 21 December 1989 and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810/07 and 18817/08, 24 May 2011;C.G. and Others v. Bulgaria (dec.), no 1365/07, 13 March 2007;Chirita v. Romania (dec.), no 37147/02, 6 September 2007;Delgado v. France, no 38437/97, Commission decision of 9 September 1998;Dzieciak v. Poland, no 77766/01, § 80, 9 December 2008;Erdogan Yagiz, no 27473/02, §§ 43-44, 6 March 2007;Folgerø and Others v. Norway (dec.), no 15472/02, 14 February 2006;Frandes v. Romania (dec.), no 35802/05, 17 May 2011;Frydlender v. France [GC], no 30979/96, ECHR 2000-VII;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978/05, § 92, ECHR 2010-...;Güleç v. Turkey, 27 July 1998, §§ 77-78, Reports 1998-IV;Isayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 57947/00, 57948/00 and 57949/00, §§ 208-213, 24 February 2005;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772/95, ECHR 2000-IV;Lapusan and Others v. Romania, nos. 29007/06, 30552/06, 31323/06, 31920/06, 34485/06, 38960/06, 38996/06, 39027/06 and 39067/06, § 61, 8 March 2011;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no 28883/95, § 115, ECHR 2001-III;Melinte v. Romania, no 43247/02, §§ 33-36, 9 November 2006;Rupa v. Romania (no 1), no 58478/00, § 90, 16 December 2008;Saileanu v. Romania, no 46268/06, § 50, 2 February 2010;Sandru and Others v. Romania, no 22465/03, 8 December 2009;Selçuk and Asker v. Turkey, 24 April 1998, § 68, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II;Selmouni v. France [GC], no 25803/94, ECHR 1999-V;Sfrijan v. Romania, no 20366/04, §§ 44-48, 22 November 2007;Šilih v. Slovenia, [GC], no 71463/01, §§ 159-163, 9 April 2009;Smirnova and Smirnova v. Russia (dec.), nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, 3 October 2002;Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044/96, 35532/97 and 44801/98, §§ 80-81, ECHR 2001-II;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no 2) [GC], no 32772/02, § 63, ECHR 2009-...;Yasa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, § 74, Reports 1998-VI
|
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award
|
TRUE
|
||
9
|
1086509_02102013
|
Mocanu and Others v. Romania (nos 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08)
|
2013-10-02 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"10865/09",
"45886/07",
"32431/08"
] |
001-146540
|
CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146540
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0917JUD001086509
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2014-09-17 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"2",
"2-1",
"3",
"6",
"6-1",
"35",
"35-1",
"35-3",
"41"
] |
[
"ROU"
] |
Abdülsamet Yaman v. Turkey, no 32446/96, § 55, 2 November 2004;Agache and Others v. Romania, no 2712/02, §§ 70-73, 20 October 2009;Ahmet Özkan and Others v. Turkey, no 21689/93, §§ 310 and 358, 6 April 2004;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports 1996 IV;Akhvlediani and Others v. Georgia (dec.), no 22026/10, §§ 23-29, 9 April 2013;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 55721/07, §§ 162-167, ECHR 2011;Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, § 102, Reports 1998 VIII;Association « 21 Decembre 1989 » and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810/07 and 18817/08, 24 May 2011;Atallah v. France (dec.), no 51987/07, 30 August 2011;Aydinlar and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no 3575/05, 9 March 2010;Balogh v. Hungary, no 47940/99, § 30, 20 July 2004;Barbu Anghelescu v. Romania, no 46430/99, § 67, 5 October 2004;Bayram and Yıldırım v. Turkey (dec.), no 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III;Blečić v. Croatia [GC], no 59532/00, § 67, ECHR 2006 III;Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no 32457/04, § 71, 27 November 2007;Bulut and Yavuz (dec.), no 76065/01, 28 May 2002;Bursuc v. Romania, no 42066/98, § 107, 12 October 2004;Çamdereli v. Turkey, no 28433/02, § 38, 17 July 2008;Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (dec.) [GC], no 13216/05, § 136, 14 December 2011;Crăiniceanu and Frumuşanu v. Romania, no 12442/04, § 92, 24 April 2012;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113/99 and Others, § 69, ECHR 2010;Dennis and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 76573/01, 2 July 2002;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630/09, ECHR 2012;Er and Others v. Turkey, no 23016/04, § 52, 31 July 2012;Frandes v. Romania (dec.), no. 35802/05, 17 May 2011;Frydlender v. France [GC], no 30979/96, § 46, ECHR 2000 VII;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978/05, § 117, ECHR 2010;Gheorghe and Maria Mihaela Dumitrescu v. Romania, no 6373, §§ 26-28, 29 July 2008;Gürtekin and Others v. Cyprus (dec.), nos. 60441/13, 68206/13 and 68667/13, 11 March 2014;Gusar v. Moldova (dec.), no 37204/02, §§ 14-17, 30 April 2013;Halat v. Turkey, no 23607/08, § 51, 8 November 2011;Haralambie v. Romania, no 21737/03, § 70, 27 October 2009;Isayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 57947/00, 57948/00 and 57949/00, § 149, 24 February 2005;Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 55508/07 and 29520/09, §§ 128-151, 21 October 2013;Jularić v. Croatia, no 20106/06, §§ 45-51, 20 January 2011;Kurić and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no 26828/06, § 286, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Lăpuşan and Others v. Romania, nos. 29007/06, 30552/06, 31323/06, 31920/06, 34485/06, 38960/06, 38996/06, 39027/06 and 39067/06, 8 March 2011;M.B. v. Romania, no 43982/06, § 64, 3 November 2011;M.C. v. Bulgaria, no 39272/98, § 150, ECHR 2003 XII;McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 161, Series A no 324;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no 31333/06, § 107, 10 September 2010;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no 28883/95, §§ 114-115, ECHR 2001-III;Micu v. Romania, no 29883/06, § 108, 8 February 2011;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, §§ 110 and 112-113, ECHR 2005-VII;Narin v. Turkey, no 18907/02, § 51, 15 December 2009;Nasirkhayeva v. Russia (dec.), no 1721/07, 31 May 2011;Paçacı and Others v. Turkey, no 3064/07, §§ 63-66, 8 November 2011;Palić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no 4704/04, § 52, 15 February 2011;Pastor and Ţiclete v. Romania, nos. 30911/06 and 40967/06, § 58, 19 April 2011;Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 46477/99, 4 June 2001;Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no 52391/99, §§ 324-325, ECHR 2007 II;Ringeisen v. Austria, 16 July 1971, § 89, Series A no 13;Röman v. Finland, no 13072/05, § 50, 29 January 2013;Sabri Güneş v. Turkey [GC], no 27396/06, § 39, 29 June 2012;Şandru and Others v. Romania, no 22465/03, §§ 55 59, 8 December 2009;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan (dec.) [GC], no 40167/06, § 135, 14 December 2011;Scoppola v. Italy (no 2) [GC], no 10249/03, § 70, 17 September 2009;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no 56581/00, § 46, ECHR 2006 II;Šilih v. Slovenia [GC], no 71463/01, §§ 159-163, 9 April 2009;Soering v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no 161, p. 34, § 88;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064/90, 16065/90, 16066/90, 16068/90, 16069/90, 16070/90, 16071/90, 16072/90 and 16073/90, ECHR 2009;Velev v. Bulgaria, no 43531/08, §§ 59-60, 16 April 2013;Vučković and Others v. Serbia [GC], nos. 17153/11 and Others, 25 March 2014;Walker v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 34979/97, ECHR 2000 I;Yaşa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, § 74, Reports 1998 VI;Yeter v. Turkey, no 33750/03, § 70, 13 January 2009;Yetişen and Others v. Turkey, no 21099/06, §§ 72-85, 10 July 2012
|
General Comment No. 3 (2012) issued by the United Nations Committee against Torture on the Implementation by States parties of Article 14 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
|
Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Six month period;Article 35-3 - Continuing situation);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Non-pecuniary damage - award;Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed
|
TRUE
|
|
10
|
1113810_04022015
|
Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia (no. 11138/10)
|
2015-02-04 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"11138/10"
] |
001-145069
|
MOZER v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145069
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
| 4
|
[
"2",
"2-1",
"3",
"5",
"5-1",
"5-1-a",
"5-1-b",
"8",
"8-1",
"9",
"9-1",
"13",
"17"
] |
[
"MDA",
"RUS"
] | |||||||
11
|
1113810_04022015
|
Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia (no. 11138/10)
|
2015-02-04 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"11138/10"
] |
001-161055
|
CASE OF MOZER v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161055
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0223JUD001113810
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2016-02-23 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"1",
"3",
"5",
"5-1",
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"9",
"9-1",
"9-2",
"13",
"13+3",
"13+8-1",
"13+9-1",
"35",
"35-1",
"35-3",
"41"
] |
[
"MDA",
"RUS"
] |
Law of the Republic of Moldova no. 1545 (1998) on compensation for damage caused by illegal acts of the criminal investigation bodies
|
Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 24, Series A no. 32;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, §§ 65-66, Reports 1996 IV;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721/07, §§ 136 and 149, ECHR 2011;Asproftas v. Turkey, no. 16079/90, § 72, 27 May 2010;Banković and Others v. Belgium and Others (dec.) [GC], no. 52207/99, § 70, ECHR 2001 XII;Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, § 86, ECHR 2015;Catan and Others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], nos. 43370/04, 8252/05 and 18454/06, § 114, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 148, ECHR 2014;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, § 145, Reports 1996 V;Chiragov and Others v. Armenia [GC], no. 13216/05, § 168, ECHR 2015;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781/94, ECHR 2001 IV;De Souza Ribeiro v. France [GC], no. 22689/07, § 78, ECHR 2012;Del Río Prada v. Spain [GC], no. 42750/09, § 125, ECHR 2013;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, § 95, ECHR 2010-I;Enea v. Italy [GC], no. 74912/01, § 55, ECHR 2009;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, § 104, Series A no. 22;Foka v. Turkey, no. 28940/95, 24 June 2008;Gherghina v. Romania [GC] (dec.), no. 42219/07, §§ 84-85, 9 July 2015;Gladkiy v. Russia, no. 3242/03, § 83, 21 December 2010;Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 93, 22 May 2012;Ilaşcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, ECHR 2004 VII;Ivanţoc and Others v. Moldova and Russia, no. 23687/05, 15 November 2011;Khoroshenko v. Russia [GC], no. 41418/04, § 106, ECHR 2015;Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000 XI;L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, §§ 36-41, Reports 1998 III;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV;Lavents v. Latvia, no. 58442/00, § 139, 28 November 2002;Lawless v. Ireland (merits), 1 July 1961, § 7, Series A no. 3;Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, § 62, Series A no. 310;Loizidou v. Turkey (merits), 18 December 1996, § 52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 VI;Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 51, ECHR 2004 XI;Messina v. Italy (no. 2), no. 25498/94, §§ 61-62, ECHR 2000 X;Orban and Others v. France, no. 20985/05, § 33, 15 January 2009;Osman v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1998, §§ 115-122, Reports 1998 VIII;Pakhomov v. Russia, no. 44917/08, § 61, 30 September 2010;Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 67, ECHR 2001-III;Petrakidou v. Turkey, no. 16081/90, § 71, 27 May 2010;Poltoratskiy v. Ukraine, no. 38812/97, § 167, ECHR 2003 V;Protopapa v. Turkey, no. 16084/90, 24 February 2009;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan [GC], no. 40167/06, § 128, ECHR 2015;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 46, ECHR 2006 II;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, § 116, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Union européenne des droits de l’homme and Josephides v. Turkey (dec.), no. 7116/10, § 9, 2 April 2013;Vučković and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153/11 and 29 others, § 70, 25 March 2014;Vučković and Others v. Serbia, nos. 17153/11 and 29 others, 28 August 2012;Yaşa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, §§ 92-108, Reports 1998 VI
|
Opinion No. 188 (1995) of the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly on the application by Moldova for membership of the Council of Europe
|
Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione loci;Ratione personae) (Russia);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies) (the Republic of Moldova);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (Russia);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention) (Russia);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (Russia);Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion) (Russia);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Russia);Violation of Article 13+8-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (Russia);Violation of Article 13+9-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion;Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion) (Russia);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 13+8-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 13+9-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion;Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion) (the Republic of Moldova);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (Russia);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (Russia)
|
TRUE
|
12
|
1188210_17122014
|
Pentikäinen v. Finland (no. 11882/10)
|
2014-12-17 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"11882/10"
] |
001-115953
|
PENTIKAINEN v. FINLAND
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115953
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
|
2011-05-19 00:00:00
| 4
|
[
"10"
] |
[
"FIN"
] |
Communicated
|
FALSE
|
||||
13
|
1188210_17122014
|
Pentikäinen v. Finland (no. 11882/10)
|
2014-12-17 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"11882/10"
] |
001-140395
|
CASE OF PENTIKÄINEN v. FINLAND
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-140395
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0204JUD001188210
|
CHAMBER
|
2014-02-04 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2"
] |
[
"FIN"
] |
Section 4 of the Penal Code
|
Barfod v. Denmark, 22 February 1989, § 28, Series A no. 149;Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 58, ECHR 1999-III;De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, 24 February 1997, § 37, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 I;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 45, ECHR 1999-I;Janowski v. Poland [GC], no. 25716/94, § 30, ECHR 1999-I;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, § 31, Series A no. 298;Juppala v. Finland, no. 18620/03, § 40, 2 December 2008;Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, Series A no. 103;Najafli v. Azerbaijan, no. 2594/07, § 68, 2 October 2012;News Verlags GmbH & Co.KG v. Austria, no. 31457/96, § 52, ECHR 2000-I;Nikula v. Finland, no. 31611/96, § 44, ECHR 2002 II;Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 43, ECHR 1999-VIII;Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30
|
No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)
|
TRUE
|
|
14
|
1188210_17122014
|
Pentikäinen v. Finland (no. 11882/10)
|
2014-12-17 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"11882/10"
] |
001-158279
|
CASE OF PENTIKÄINEN v. FINLAND
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-158279
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1020JUD001188210
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2015-10-20 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2"
] |
[
"FIN"
] |
Section 19 of the Police Act, in Chapter 1 ; Section 2, subsection 2, of the Coercive Measures Act ; Chapter 16, section 4, of the Penal Code ; Section 24, subsection 2, of the Criminal Investigations Act
|
Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876/08, § 100, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, ECHR 1999-III;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433/09, § 140, ECHR 2012;Cumpănă and Mazăre v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, § 116, ECHR 2004 XI;Dammann v. Switzerland, no. 77551/01, § 52, 25 April 2006;De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, 24 February 1997, § 37, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 I;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, ECHR 1999 I;Gsell v. Switzerland, no. 12675/05, § 49, 8 October 2009;Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, § 49 in fine, Series A no. 24;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, § 31, Series A no. 298;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, § 141, ECHR 2001 VII;Kasabova v. Bulgaria, no. 22385/03, §§ 61 and 63-68, 19 April 2011;Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, § 59, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II;Krone Verlag GmbH v. Austria, no. 27306/07, §§ 46-47, 19 June 2012;Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, § 29, Series A no. 176-A;Monnat v. Switzerland, no. 73604/01, § 66, ECHR 2006-X;Morice v. France [GC], no. 29369/10, § 124, 23 April 2015;Najafli v. Azerbaijan, no. 2594/07, § 67, 2 October 2012;Novaya Gazeta and Borodyanskiy v. Russia, no. 14087/08, § 37, 28 March 2013;Perna v. Italy [GC], no. 48898/99, § 47, ECHR 2003 V;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 52, ECHR 2000-V;Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no. 69698/01, ECHR 2007 V;Taranenko v. Russia, no. 19554/05, § 95, 15 May 2014;The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, § 65, Series A no. 30;The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 2), 26 November 1991, § 51, Series A no. 217;Times Newspapers Ltd v. the United Kingdom (nos. 1 and 2), nos. 3002/03 and 23676/03, ECHR 2009;Ungváry and Irodalom Kft v. Hungary, no. 64520/10, § 42, 3 December 2013;Yordanova and Toshev v. Bulgaria, no. 5126/05, §§ 53 and 55, 2 October 2012
|
No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)
|
TRUE
|
|
15
|
1214818_22012019
|
A.M. v. France (no. 12148/18)
|
2019-01-22 00:00:00
|
Chamber hearing
|
[
"12148/18"
] |
001-192958
|
CASE OF A.M. v. FRANCE
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-192958
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0429JUD001214818
|
CHAMBER
|
2019-04-29 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"3",
"35",
"35-1",
"41"
] |
[
"FRA"
] |
Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 69, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Azzolina and Others v. Italy, nos. 28923/09 and 67599/10, § 105, 26 October 2017;Bahaddar v. the Netherlands, 19 February 1998, §§ 47-48, Reports 1998 I;Baumann v. France, no 33592/96, § 47, ECHR 2001 V (extracts);Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V, p. 1855, § 79;Daoudi v. France, no 19576/08, 3 December 2009;F.G. v. Sweden [GC], no 43611/11, §§ 111-118, 23 March 2016;Gebremedhin [Gaberamadhien] v. France, no 25389/05, §§ 64-66, ECHR 2007 II;J.K. and Others v. Sweden [GC], no 59166/12, 23 August 2016;Karoussiotis v. Portugal, no 23205/08, § 57, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Kuric and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no 26828/06, § 286, 26 June 2012;M.A. v. France, no 9373/15, 1 February 2018;M.X. v. France (no 21580/10, § 37, 1 July 2014;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no 17056/06, § 55, ECHR 2009;NA. v. the United Kingdom, no 25904/07, § 90, 17 July 2008;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no 10593/08, § 142, ECHR 2012;Rafaa v. France, no 25393/10, § 33, 30 May 2013;Raninen v. Finland, 16 December 1997, § 41, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VIII;Ringeisen v. Austria, 16 July 1971, § 89, Series A no 13;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no 37201/06, § 128, ECHR 2008;Sahin Alpay v. Turkey, no 16538/17, § 86, 20 March 2018;Selmouni v. France [GC], no 25803/94, § 95, ECHR 1999-V;Stanka Mirkovic and Others v. Montenegro, nos. 33781/15 and 3 others, § 48, 7 March 2017;Trabelsi v. Belgium, no 140/10, § 89, ECHR 2014 (extracts);X v. the Netherlands, no 14319/17, § 72, 10 July 2018;Y.P. and L.P. v. France, no 32476/06, § 53, 2 September 2010
|
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Algeria)
|
FALSE
|
||
16
|
1232311_02102012
|
Michaud v. France (nos. 12323/11)
|
2012-10-02 00:00:00
|
Chamber hearing
|
[
"12323/11"
] |
001-115377
|
CASE OF MICHAUD v. FRANCE
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115377
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1206JUD001232311
|
CHAMBER
|
2012-12-06 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"34",
"35"
] |
[
"FRA"
] |
Decision of the National Bar Council of 12 July 2007 “adopting regulations on internal procedures for implementing the obligation to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, and an internal supervisory mechanism to guarantee compliance with those procedures” ; Article 21-1 of the Law of 31 December 1971 ; Law no. 2004-130 of 11 February 2004 ; Monetary and Financial Code
|
André and Other v. France, no 18603/03, 24 July 2008;Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi v. Ireland [GC], no 45036/98, ECHR 2005-VI;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 13378/05, §§ 33-34, ECHR 2008;Campbell v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1992, §§ 44 and 46-48, Series A no 233;Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1981, § 41, Series A no 28;Ekinci and Akalin v. Turkey, no 77097/01, § 47, 30 January 2007;Frérot v. France, no 70204/01, §§ 53-54, 12 June 2007;Grifhorst v. France, no 28336/02, § 93, 26 February 2009;Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 18 December 1986, § 42, Series A no 112;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 52, Series A no 260-A;Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no 30696/09, ECHR 2011;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, § 27, Series A no 31;Mor v. France, no 28198/09, 15 December 2011;Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, Series A no 251-B;Norris v. Ireland, 26 October 1988, §§ 30-34 and 38, Series A no 142;Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, no 51772/99, ECHR 2003-IV;Sallinen and Others v. Finland, no 50882/99, 27 September 2005;Schönenberger and Durmaz v. Switzerland, 20 June 1988, Series A no 137;Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1983, §§ 56-88, Series A no 61;Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no 74336/01, §§ 65-66, ECHR 2007-IV;Xavier Da Silveira v. France, no 43757/05, § 36-37 and 43, 21 January 2010
|
Directive 91/308/EEC, 10 June 1991;Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union;Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;Articles 169, 170, 173, 175, 177, 184 and 189 of the Treaty establishing the European Community;Recommendations 12 and 16 of the financial action task force (“FATF”) on money laundering;Council of Europe Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime and on the Financing of Terrorism (16 May 2005)
|
Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life)
|
FALSE
|
17
|
1273810_13112013
|
Jeunesse v. the Netherlands (no.12738/10)
|
2013-11-13 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"12738/10"
] |
001-115732
|
JEUNESSE v. THE NETHERLANDS
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115732
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1204DEC001273810
|
DECISIONS
| 4
|
[
"3",
"5",
"5-1-f",
"5-4",
"5-5",
"8",
"13",
"14",
"14+8",
"35",
"P4-3",
"P12-1"
] |
[
"NLD"
] |
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
| |||||
18
|
1273810_13112013
|
Jeunesse v. the Netherlands (no.12738/10)
|
2013-11-13 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"12738/10"
] |
001-115788
|
JEUNESSE v. THE NETHERLANDS
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115788
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
|
2012-12-04 00:00:00
| 4
|
[
"3",
"5",
"5-1",
"5-4",
"8",
"8-1"
] |
[
"NLD"
] |
FALSE
|
|||||
19
|
1273810_13112013
|
Jeunesse v. the Netherlands (no.12738/10)
|
2013-11-13 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"12738/10"
] |
001-147117
|
CASE OF JEUNESSE v. THE NETHERLANDS
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-147117
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1003JUD001273810
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2014-10-03 00:00:00
| 2
|
[
"8",
"8-1",
"41"
] |
[
"NLD"
] |
Aliens Act 1965 ; Aliens Act 2000 ; Article 3 of the Agreement between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Republic of Suriname concerning the assignment of nationality
|
Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94, p. 94, § 68;Ahmut v. the Netherlands, 28 November 1996, § 63, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 VI;Ajayi and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 27663/95, 22 June 1999;Arvelo Aponte v. the Netherlands, no. 28770/05, §§ 57-58, 3 November 2011;B.V. v. Sweden (dec.), no. 57442/11, 13 November 2012;Benamar v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 43786/04, 5 April 2005;Boultif v. Switzerland, no. 54273/00, ECHR 2001 IX;Butt v. Norway, no. 47017/09, § 78, 4 December 2012;Chandra and Others v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 53102/99, 13 May 2003;Darren Omoregie and Others v. Norway, no. 265/07, § 64, 31 July 2008;Djokaba Lambi Longa v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 33917/12, § 81, 9 October 2012;M. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 25087/06, 24 June 2008;Maslov v. Austria [GC], no. 1638/03, ECHR 2008;Mitchell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 40447/98, 24 November 1998;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no. 41615/07, § 135, ECHR 2010;Nunez v. Norway, no. 55597/09, § 66, 28 June 2011;Popov v. France, nos. 39472/07 and 39474/07, §§ 139-140, 19 January 2012;Priya v. Denmark (dec.), no. 13594/03, 6 July 2006;Rodrigues da Silva and Hoogkamer v. the Netherlands, no. 50435/99, ECHR 2006-I;Savasci v. Germany (dec.), no. 45971/08, 19 March 2013;Tuquabo-Tekle and Others v. the Netherlands, no. 60665/00, § 44, 1 December 2005;Udeh v. Switzerland, no. 12020/09, 16 April 2013;Ullens de Schooten and Rezabek v. Belgium, nos. 3989/07 and 38353/07, § 54, 20 September 2011;Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410/99, ECHR 2006 XII;Useinov v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 61292/00, 11 April 2006;X v. Latvia [GC], no. 27853/09, § 96, ECHR 2013
|
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award
|
TRUE
|
|
20
|
1321605_22012014
|
Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (no. 13216/05)
|
2014-01-22 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"13216/05"
] |
001-108383
|
CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108383
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1214DEC001321605
|
DECISIONS
| 2
|
[
"8",
"13",
"14",
"34",
"35",
"35-1",
"35-2",
"35-3",
"P1-1"
] |
[
"ARM"
] |
Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 55721/07, §§ 131-132 and 138-139, 7 July 2011;Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no 59532/00, §§ 70 and 86, ECHR 2006-III;Chrysostomos, Papachrysostomou and Loizidou v. Turkey, nos. 15299/89, 15300/89 and 15318/89, DR 68, p. 287;Cyprus v. Turkey, no. 8007/77, §§ 104, 174-175 and 184-186, decision of 10 July 1978, Decisions and Reports (DR) 13, p. 228;David v. Moldova, no. 41578/05, § 28, 27 February 2008;Demades v. Turkey, no. 16219/90, §§ 14-17, 31 July 2003;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, ECHR/ECHR 2010;Dogan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 8803-8811/02, 8813/02 and 8815-8819/02, §§ 111-114, ECHR 2004-VI;Eugenia Michaelidou Developments Ltd and Michael Tymvios v. Turkey, no. 16163/90, §§ 15-18, 31 July 2003;Folgerø and Others v. Norway (dec.), no. 15472/02, 14 February 2006;Harutyunyan v. Armenia, no. 36549/03, ECHR 2007-III;Içyer v. Turkey (dec.), no. 18888/02, § 73, ECHR 2006-I;Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, ECHR 2004-VII;J.A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd and J.A. Pye (Oxford) Land Ltd v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44302/02, ECHR 2007-X;Loizidou v. Turkey [GC], no. 15318/89, §§ 41-47 and 62-63, ECHR 1996-VI;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696/09, § 251, 21 January 2011;Malhous v. the Czech Republic [GC] (dec.), no. 33071/96, ECHR 2000-XII;Maltzan and Others v. Germany (dec.) [GC], nos. 71916/01, 71917/01 and 10260/02, § 74, ECHR 2005-V;Moldovan and Others and Rostas and Others v. Romania (dec.), nos. 41138/98 and 64320/01, 13 March 2001;OAO Neftyanaya Kompaniya Yukos v. Russia, 14902/04, §§ 520-526, 20 September 2011;Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece, 24 June 1993, §§ 39-46, Series A no. 260-B;Preussische Treuhand GmbH & Co. KG A.A. v. Poland (dec.), no. 47550/06, §§ 57-62, 7 October 2008;Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, §§ 84-86, ECHR 2001-VIII;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064/90, 16065/90, 16066/90, 16068/90, 16069/90, 16070/90, 16071/90, 16072/90 and 16073/90, 18 September 2009;Varnava and Others v. Turkey, nos. 16064/90, 16065/90, 16066/90, 16068/90, 16069/90, 16070/90, 16071/90, 16072/90 and 16073/90, decision of the Commission,14 April 1998, Decisions and Reports 93-B, pp. 5, 14;Vasilescu v. Romania, 22 May 1998, §§ 48-49, Reports 1998-III;Xenides-Arestis v. Turkey (dec.), no. 46347/99, 14 March 2005;Xenides-Arestis v. Turkey, no. 46347/99, § 28, 22 December 2005;Zalyan, Sargsyan and Serobyan v. Armenia (déc), nos. 36894/04 and 3521/07, 11 October 2007
|
Articles 25 and 28 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969
|
Admissible
| |||
21
|
1321605_22012014
|
Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (no. 13216/05)
|
2014-01-22 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"13216/05"
] |
001-155353
|
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155353
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD001321605
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2015-06-16 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"1",
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"13",
"34",
"35",
"35-1",
"35-3",
"41",
"P1-1",
"P1-1-1"
] |
[
"ARM"
] |
Articles 2.1 and 2.2 of the 1985 Instructions on Rules of Registration of Housing Facilities of the Azerbaijan SSR ; 1978 Constitution of the Azerbaijan SSR ; Articles 4, 25, 27 and 28 of the 1970 Land Code of the Azerbaijan SSR ; Article 10.3 of the 1983 Housing Code of the Azerbaijan SSR ; Article 32, section 1(8) of the 1992 Land Code of the Azerbaijan SSR
|
Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 55721/07, ECHR 2011;Catan and Others v. Moldova and Russia, [GC], nos. 43370/04, 8252/05 and 18454/06, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no 25781/94, § 76, ECHR 2001-IV;Damayev v. Russia, no 36150/04, §§ 108-111, 29 May 2012;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, § 69, ECHR 2010;Doğan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 8803-8811/02, 8813/02 and 8815-8819/02, ECHR 2004 VI (extracts);El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, [GC], no 39630/09, § 163, ECHR 2012;Elsanova v. Russia (dec.), no 57952/00, 15 November 2005;Ilaşcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia, [GC], no 48787/99, ECHR 2004-VII;Kerimova and Others v. Russia, nos. 17170/04, 20792/04, 22448/04, 23360/04, 5681/05 and 5684/05, 3 May 2011;Loizidou v. Turkey, (merits), 18 December 1996, Reports 1996 VI;Lordos and Others v. Turkey, no 15973/90, § 50, 2 November 2010;Niazi Kazali and Hakan Kazali v. Cyprus (dec.), no 49247/08, § 132, 6 March 2012;Öneryıldız v. Turkey, no 48939/99, § 124, ECHR 2004-XII;Orphanides v. Turkey, no 36705/97, § 39, 20 January 2009;Prokopovich v. Russia, no 58255/00, § 37, ECHR 2004-XI;Saveriades v. Turkey, no 16160/90, 22 September 2009;Solomonides v. Turkey, no 16161/90, § 31, 20 January 2009;Xenides-Arestis v. Turkey, no 46347/99, § 36, 22 December 2005
|
Resolutions No. 822 of 30 April (S/RES/822 (1993)), No. 853 of 29 July (S/RES/853 (1993)), No. 874 of 14 October (S/RES/874 (1993)), No. 884 of 12 November (S/RES/884 (1993)) of the United Nations (UN) Security Council;Human Rights Watch (HRW) report (“Seven Years of Conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh”, December 1994);Agreement on Military Co-operation between the Governments of the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Nagorno Karabakh;Resolution on “The Situation in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan” (A/RES/62/243) of the UN General Assembly adopted on 14 March 2008;European Parliament resolution of 18 April 2012 containing the European Parliament's recommendations to the Council, the Commission and the European External Action Service on the negotiations of the EU-Armenia Association Agreement (2011/2315(INI));Resolution 1416 of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, adopted on 25 January 2005;Report “Nagorno-Karabakh: Viewing the Conflict from the Ground” of the International Crisis Group (ICG) of 14 September 2005;Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua, judgment Nicaragua v. United States of America, Merits, Judgment, International Court of Justice, Reports 1986, p. 14, § 64;Resolution 1708 (2010) on “Solving property issues of refugees and displaced persons” of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe;Article 3 of the UN “Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons” (Commission on Human Rights, Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, 28 June 2005, E/CN.4/Sub.2/2005/17, Annex, (“Pinheiro Principles”)
|
Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Article 35-3 - Ratione loci);Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Positive obligations;Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Possessions);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for home;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy);Just satisfaction reserved (Article 41 - Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
22
|
1321605_22012014
|
Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (no. 13216/05)
|
2014-01-22 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"13216/05"
] |
001-179554
|
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179554
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212JUD001321605
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2017-12-12 00:00:00
| 2
|
[
"8",
"8-1",
"13",
"35",
"35-3-a",
"41",
"P1-1",
"P1-1-1"
] |
[
"ARM"
] |
Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 65, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV;Ališić and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 60642/08, ECHR 2014;Avcı and Others v. Turkey, no. 70417/01, § 56, 27 June 2006;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433/09, § 222, ECHR 2012;Cyprus v. Turkey (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 25781/94, § 56, ECHR 2014;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113/99 and 7 others, § 85, ECHR 2010;Doğan and Others v. Turkey (just satisfaction), nos. 8803/02 and 14 others, § 61, 13 July 2006;Ernestina Zullo v. Italy [GC], no. 64897/01, §§ 115-116 and 148-149, 29 March 2006;Ječius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 109, ECHR 2000-IX;Kovačić and Others v. Slovenia [GC], nos. 44574/98 and 2 others, §§ 255-256, 3 October 2008 Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113/99 and 7 others, § 85, ECHR 2010;Kurić and Others v. Slovenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 26828/06, ECHR 2014;Loizidou v. Turkey (Article 50), 28 July 1998, Reports 1998 IV;Malhous v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 33071/96, 12 July 2001;Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece (Article 50), 31 October 1995, § 34, Series A no. 330-B;Solomonides v. Turkey (just satisfaction), no. 16161/90, §§ 42-43 and 47, 27 July 2010;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064/90 and 8 others, § 224, ECHR 2009;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772/02, §§ 84-88, ECHR 2009
|
Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
FALSE
|
||
23
|
1325507_13062012
|
Georgia v. Russia (I) (no. 13255/07) Just satisfaction
|
2012-06-13 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"13255/07"
] |
001-145546
|
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (I)
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145546
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0703JUD001325507
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2014-07-03 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"3",
"5",
"5-1",
"5-1-f",
"5-4",
"8",
"8-1",
"13",
"13+3",
"13+5-1",
"19",
"35",
"35-1",
"38",
"41",
"P1-1",
"P1-1-1",
"P1-2",
"P4-4",
"P7-1",
"P7-1-1"
] |
[
"RUS"
] |
Circular no. 0215 of 30.09.2006 of the Main Directorate of Internal Affairs of St Petersburg and the Leningrad Region ; Circular no. 849 of 29 September 2006 of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation ; Articles 18.8, 18.10 and 18.11 of the Code of Administrative Offences
|
Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 69, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, § 127, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 V;Čonka v. Belgium, no 51564/99, ECHR 2002 I;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no 25781/94, ECHR 2001 IV;Davydov and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 17674/02 and 39081/02, 1 July 2010;France, Norway, Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands v. Turkey, nos. 9940 9944/82, decision of the Commission of 6 December 1983, § 19, DR 35;Georgia v. Russia (I) (dec.), no 13255/07, §§ 44-46 and 50, 30 June 2009;Gusinskiy v. Russia, no 70276/01, § 73, ECHR 2004 IV;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no 27765/09, ECHR 2012;Idalov v. Russia [GC], no 5826/03, 22 May 2012;Ilaşcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no 48787/99, ECHR 2004 VII;Imakayeva v. Russia, no 7615/02, § 111, ECHR 2006 XIII (extracts);Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no 25;Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 55508/07 and 29520/09, ECHR 2013;Kalashnikov v. Russia, no 47095/99, ECHR 2002 VI;Khudoyorov v. Russia, no 6847/02, §§ 116 and seq., ECHR 2005 X (extracts);Lutsenko v. Ukraine, no 6492/11, § 105, 3 July 2012;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no 30696/09, §§ 227 and 255, ECHR 2011;Mathew v. the Netherlands, no 24919/03, § 156, ECHR 2005 IX;Mudayevy v. Russia, no 33105/05, § 127, 8 April 2010;NA. v. the United Kingdom, no 25904/07, §§ 119-120, 17 July 2008;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 147, ECHR 2005-VII;Niyazov v. Russia, no 27843/11, §§ 87 and seq., 16 October 2012;Nolan and K. v. Russia, no 2512/04, § 56, 12 February 2009;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no 37201/06, ECHR 2008;Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no 36378/02, 246 and 362, ECHR 2005 III;Solovyevy v. Russia, no 918/02, § 123, 24 April 2012;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760/06, § 168, ECHR 2012;Sufi and Elmi v. the United Kingdom, nos. 8319/07 and 11449/07, § 230, 28 June 2011;Sultani v. France, no 45223/05, ECHR 2007 IV (extracts);Tymoshenko v. Ukraine, no 49872/11, § 294, 30 April 2013
|
Report of the Monitoring Committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe – PACE Report;Information note of 1 November 2006 of the Federal Migration Service of the Russian Federation - HRW Report;Report of the International Federation for Human Rights - FIDH Report;Report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT) on the Russian Federation of December 2001;Report to the Russian Government on the CPT’s visit to the Russian Federation from 2 to 7 December 2001, § 32, CPT/Inf (2003) 30
|
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case-{general} (Article 38 - Obligation to furnish all necessary facilities);Violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens-{general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+5-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5 - Right to liberty and security);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Prohibition of torture);No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 - Procedural safeguards relating to expulsion of aliens (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 7 - Expulsion of an alien;Lawfully resident);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Deprivation of property);No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to education-{general} (Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to education);Just satisfaction reserved
|
TRUE
|
24
|
1325507_13062012
|
Georgia v. Russia (I) (no. 13255/07) Just satisfaction
|
2012-06-13 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"13255/07"
] |
001-189019
|
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (I)
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-189019
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0131JUD001325507
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2019-01-31 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"33",
"41"
] |
[
"RUS"
] |
Ališić and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 60642/08, § 142, ECHR 2014;Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 142, 10 January 2012;Berdzenishvili and Others v. Russia, nos. 14594/07 and 6 others, 20 December 2016;Burmych and Others v. Ukraine (striking out) [GC], nos. 46852/13 et al., 12 October 2017;Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 13216/05, 12 December 2017;Cyprus v. Turkey (just satisfaction), [GC], no. 25781/94, ECHR 2014;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113/99 and 7 others, § 69, ECHR 2010;Georgia v. Russia (I) [GC], no. 13255/07, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom, nos. 60041/08 and 60054/08, § 97, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 94, 22 May 2012;Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 55508/07 and 29520/09, § 202, ECHR 2013;Lisnyy v. Ukraine and Russia, nos. 5355/15, 44913/15 and 50852/15, 5 July 2016;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 40167/06, 12 December 2017;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064/90 and 8 others, ECHR 2009
|
Articles 30 and 31 of the Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (2001) of the Commission of International Law (United Nations)
|
Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
|
25
|
1325507_13062012
|
Georgia v. Russia (I) (no. 13255/07) Just satisfaction
|
2012-06-13 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"13255/07"
] |
001-93425
|
GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (I)
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-93425
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0630DEC001325507
|
DECISIONS
| 2
|
[
"33",
"35",
"35-1"
] |
[
"RUS"
] |
Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, § 159, Series A no. 25;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 68, Reports of Judgments and Decisions, 1996-IV;Denmark v. Turkey (dec), no. 34382/97, 8 June 1999 Eur. Comm. H.R. Nos. 9940-9944/82, Dec. 6.12.83, DR 35, §§19, 21-22;No. 25781/94, Dec. 28.6.96, D.R. 86
|
Preliminary objections joined to merits;Admissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period
| ||||
26
|
1430517_18092019
|
Selahattin Demirtaş v. Turkey (no. 2) (no. 14305/17)
|
2019-09-18 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"14305/17"
] |
001-187961
|
CASE OF SELAHATTİN DEMİRTAŞ v. TURKEY (No. 2)
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187961
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1120JUD001430517
|
CHAMBER
|
2018-11-20 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"5",
"5-1",
"5-1-c",
"5-3",
"5-4",
"18",
"18+5-3",
"34",
"35",
"35-1",
"35-2-b",
"35-3-a",
"41",
"46",
"46-2",
"P1-3"
] |
[
"TUR"
] |
Articles 100 § 3 and 141 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (“the CCP”) ; Article 18 of the Constitution
|
Agit Demir v. Turkey, no 36475/10, § 39, 27 February 2018;Ali Rıza Kaplan v. Turkey, no 24597/08, §§ 19-23, 13 November 2014;Al-Jedda v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 27021/08, § 99, ECHR 2011;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no 71503/01, ECHR 2004 II;Azzolina and Others v. Italy, nos. 28923/09 and 67599/10, § 105, 26 October 2017;Balbay v. Turkey, (dec.), nos. 666/11 and 73745/11, § 69, 3 March 2015;Baranowski v. Poland, no 28358/95, § 52, ECHR 2000 III;Baumann v. France, no 33592/96, § 47, ECHR 2001 V (extracts);Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no 23755/07, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Cahit Demirel v. Turkey, no 18623/03, §§ 21 28, 7 July 2009;Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, § 42, Series A no 236;Ceviz v. Turkey, no 8140/08, §§ 41 44, 17 July 2012;Çiçek v. Turkey (dec.), no 72774/10, § 62, 3 March 2015;Clooth v. Belgium, 12 December 1991, § 44, Series A no 225;Contrada v. Italy, 24 August 1998, §§ 58 65, Reports 1998-V;Cordova v. Italy (no 1), no 40877/98, § 59, ECHR 2003-I;Creangă v. Romania [GC], no 29226/03, § 101, 23 February 2012;D.N. v. Switzerland [GC], no 27154/95, § 41, ECHR 2001 III;Del Río Prada v. Spain [GC], no 42750/09, ECHR 2013;Ersöz v. Turkey (dec.), no 45746/11, § 50, 17 February 2015;Etxeberria and Others v. Spain, nos. 35579/03 and 3 others, § 48, 30 June 2009;Fatullayev v. Azerbaijan, no 40984/07, § 172, 22 April 2010;Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. the United Kingdom, 30 August 1990, § 32, Series A no 182;Galip Doğru v. Turkey, no 36001/06, § 58, 28 April 2015;Gavril Yosifov v. Bulgaria, no 74012/01, § 40, 6 November 2008;Grosaru v. Romania, no 78039/01, § 47, ECHR 2010;Giorgi Nikolaishvili v. Georgia, no 37048/04, §§ 73 and 76, 13 January 2009;Gürdeniz v. Turkey, (dec.), no 59715/10, § 37, 18 March 2014;İbrahim Güler v. Turkey, no 1942/08, §§ 19-27, 15 October 2013;Idalov v. Russia [GC], no 5826/03, § 145, 22 May 2012;Ilaşcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no 48787/99, § 487, ECHR 2004-VII;Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no 15172/13, § 90, 22 May 2014;Ilıcak v. Turkey, no 15394/02, § 30, 5 April 2007;Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no 33977/96, 26 July 2001;Jėčius v. Lithuania, no 34578/97, § 50, ECHR 2000 IX;Karácsony and Others v. Hungary [GC], nos. 42461/13 and 44357/13, § 141, 17 May 2016;Karoussiotis v. Portugal, no 23205/08, § 57, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Kavakçı v. Turkey, no 71907/01, §§ 40-41, 5 April 2007;Koçintar v. Turkey (dec.), no 77429/12, §§ 30-46, 1 July 2014;Kolomenskiy v. Russia, no 27297/07, § 88, 13 December 2016;Korenjak v. Slovenia (dec.), no 463/03, § 73, 15 May 2007;Korkmaz and Others v. Turkey, no 35979/97, §§ 24-26, 21 March 2006;Kučera v. Slovakia, no 48666/99, § 94, 17 July 2007;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772/95, § 170, ECHR 2000 IV;Lamy v. Belgium, 30 March 1989, § 29, Series A no 151;Letellier v. France, 26 June 1991, Series A no 207;Lietzow v. Germany, no 24479/94, § 44, ECHR 2001 I;Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, §§ 41 and 42, Series A no 103;Lukanov v. Bulgaria, no 21915/93, decision of the Commission of 12 January 1995, Decisions and Reports (DR) 80-B, p. 108;Luković v. Serbia, no 43808/07, § 54, 26 March 2013;Lykourezos v. Greece, no 33554/03, § 56, ECHR 2006-VIII;M. v. Germany, no 19359/04, § 90, ECHR 2009;Maestri v. Italy [GC], no 39748/98, § 47, ECHR 2004 I;Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, 2 March 1987, Series A no 113;McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], nº 543/03, § 44, ECHR 2006 X;Megyeri v. Germany, 12 May 1992, § 22, Series A no 237 A;Mehmet Hasan Altan v. Turkey, no 13237/17, 20 March 2018;Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no 72508/13, § 222, 28 November 2017;Mergen and Others v. Turkey, nos. 44062/09 and 4 others, § 48, 31 May 2016;Metin v. Turkey (dec.), no 77479/11, § 57, 3 March 2015;Mooren v. Germany [GC], no 11364/03, 9 July 2009;Murray v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1994, Series A no 300 A;Mustafa Avci v. Turkey, no 39322/12, 23 May 2017;Năstase v. Romania (dec.), no 80563/12, § 109, 18 November 2014;Nedim Şener v. Turkey, no 38270/11, § 70, 8 July 2014;Neumeister v. Austria, 27 June 1968, p. 37, §§ 4-5, Series A no 8;Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no 31195/96, § 58, ECHR 1999 II;O’Hara v. the United Kingdom, no 37555/97, § 34, ECHR 2001 X;Oshurko v. Ukraine, no 33108/05, § 98, 8 September 2011;Ovsjannikov v. Estonia, no 1346/12, §§ 72-78, 20 February 2014;Paksas v. Lithuania [GC], no 34932/04, § 97, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Peraldi v. France (dec.), no 2096/05, 7 April 2009;Podkolzina v. Latvia, no 46726/99, § 33, ECHR 2002-II;Poyraz v. Turkey (dec.), no 21235/11, § 53, 17 February 2015;Rasul Jafarov v. Azerbaijan, no 69981/14, § 170, 17 March 2016;Reinprecht v. Austria, no 67175/01, § 39, ECHR 2005 XII;Riza and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 48555/10 and 48377/10, § 141, 13 October 2015;Roseiro Bento v. Portugal (dec.), no 29288/02, ECHR 2004-XII (extracts);Sadak and Others v. Turkey (no 2), nos. 25144/94 and 8 others, §§ 31- 33, ECHR 2002 IV;Şahin Alpay v. Turkey, no 16538/17, 20 March 2018;Schöps v. Germany, no 25116/94, § 44, ECHR 2001-I;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000 VIII;Şık v. Turkey, no 53413/11, § 62, 8 July 2014;Sılay v. Turkey, no 8691/02, § 27, 5 April 2007;Smatana v. the Czech Republic, no 18642/04, §§ 119-124, 27 September 2007;Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, §§ 60-63, ECHR 2003 IX (extracts);Sobacı v. Turkey, no 26733/02, § 27, 29 November 2007;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760/06, § 143, ECHR 2012;Stanka Mirković and Others v. Montenegro, nos. 33781/15 and 3 others, § 48, 7 March 2017;Stögmüller v. Austria, 10 November 1969, p. 40, § 4, Series A nº 9;Süleyman Erdem v. Turkey, no 49574/99, § 37, 19 September 2006;Tănase v. Moldova [GC], no 7/08, § 154, ECHR 2010;Uspaskich v. Lithuania, no 14737/08, 20 December 2016;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no 2) [GC], no 32772/02, § 85, ECHR 2009;Voisine v. France, no 27362/95, decision of the Commission of 14 January 1998;W. v. Switzerland, 26 January 1993, § 33, Series A no 254 A;Weeks v. the United Kingdom, 2 March 1987, § 40, Series A no 114;Wemhoff v. Germany, 27 June 1968, p. 25, §§12-15, Series A no 7;Whiteside v. Royaume Uni, no 20357/92, decision of the Commission of 7 March 1994;Włoch v. Poland, no 27785/95, § 108, ECHR 2000 XI;Yüksel and Others v. Turkey, nos. 55835/09 and 2 others, § 52, 31 May 2016;Ždanoka v. Latvia [GC], no 58278/00, § 115, ECHR 2006 IV;Žúbor v. Slovakia, no 7711/06, §§ 71 77, 6 December 2011
|
Memorandum by the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights following his visits to Turkey in 2016;Opinion of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) on the suspension of the second paragraph of Article 83 of the Constitution;Opinion on the amendments to the Constitution adopted by the Grand National Assembly on 21 January 2017 and submitted to a national referendum on 16 April 2017, adopted by the Venice Commission;Amnesty International Report 2017/2018: The state of the world’s human rights
|
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already submitted to another international procedure;Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention;Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-{general} (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Free expression of the opinion of the people;Stand for election);Violation of Article 18+5-3 - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security;Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);No violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article 34 - Hinder the exercise of the right of application);Respondent State to take individual measures (Article 46-2 - Individual measures);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
27
|
1430517_18092019
|
Selahattin Demirtaş v. Turkey (no. 2) (no. 14305/17)
|
2019-09-18 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"14305/17"
] |
001-207173
|
CASE OF SELAHATTİN DEMİRTAŞ v. TURKEY (No. 2)
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207173
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1222JUD001430517
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2020-12-22 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"5",
"5-1",
"5-1-c",
"5-3",
"5-4",
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2",
"18",
"18+5",
"34",
"35",
"35-1",
"35-2-b",
"41",
"46",
"46-2",
"P1-3"
] |
[
"TUR"
] |
Articles 83, 85, 148 and Provisional Article 20 of the Constitution and its explanatory memorandum ; Articles 100 et seq., 141 § 1(a) and (d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure ; Articles 214 § 1, 314 §§ 1 and 2 of the Criminal Code
|
A. v. the United Kingdom, no 35373/97, § 79, 17 December 2002;A.M. v. France, no 12148/18, § 66, 29 April 2019;A.Ş. v. Turkey, no 58271/10, § 94, 13 September 2016;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 68, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, § 70, Reports 1996 VI;Aleksanyan v. Russia, no 46468/06, §§ 239-240, 22 December 2008;Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, nos. 68762/14 and 71200/14, § 152, 20 September 2018;Allan v. the United Kingdom, no 48539/99, § 43, ECHR 2002 IX;Alparslan Altan v. Turkey, no 12778/17, §§ 127-130 and 139, 16 April 2019;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no 71503/01, §§ 169 and 202-203, ECHR 2004 II;Baka v. Hungary [GC], no 20261/12, § 117, 23 June 2016;Borisenko v. Ukraine, no 25725/02, §§ 41 42, 12 January 2012;Bowman v. the United Kingdom, 19 February 1998, § 42, Reports 1998 I;Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no 23755/07, §§ 84-91 and 102, 5 July 2016;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no 4378/02, § 110, 10 March 2009;C.G.I.L. and Cofferati v. Italy, no 46967/07, § 71, 24 February 2009;Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, Series A no 236;Cebotari v. Moldova, no 35615/06, §§ 52 53, 13 November 2007;Celniku v. Greece, no 21449/04, § 40, 5 July 2007;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no 38433/09, §§ 140-142, ECHR 2012;Çiçek v. Turkey (dec.), no 72774/10, § 62, 3 March 2015;Cordova v. Italy (no 1), no 40877/98, § 59, ECHR 2003 I;Cordova v. Italy (no 2), no 45649/99, § 60, ECHR 2003 I (extracts);Cristea v. the Republic of Moldova, no 35098/12, § 25, 12 February 2019;Cüneyt Polat v. Turkey, no 32211/07, § 49, 13 November 2014;De Jorio v. Italy, no 73936/01, § 52, 3 June 2004;Decision on the competence of the Court to give an advisory opinion, § 31, ECHR 2004-VI;Del Río Prada v. Spain [GC], no 42750/09, §§ 138-139, ECHR 2013;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no 64569/09, §§ 120-122, ECHR 2015;Demir v. Turkey (dec.), no 51770/07, §§ 22-26, 16 October 2012;Dervishi v. Croatia, no 67341/10, §§ 124 125, 25 September 2012;Dolenec v. Croatia, no 25282/06, §§ 184-185, 26 November 2009;Etxeberria and Others v. Spain, nos. 35579/03 and 3 others, § 48, 30 June 2009;Fatullayev v. Azerbaijan, no 40984/07, §§ 176-177, 22 April 2010;Fédération hellénique des syndicats des employés du secteur bancaire v. Greece (dec.), no 72808/10, §§ 32-45, 6 December 2011;Féret v. Belgium, no 15615/07, § 65, 16 July 2009;Fernández Martínez v. Spain [GC], no 56030/07, § 117, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. the United Kingdom, 30 August 1990, §§ 32 and 34, Series A no 182;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978/05, §§ 115 and 164, ECHR 2010;Gavril Yosifov v. Bulgaria, no 74012/01, §§ 41 and 43, 6 November 2008;Gherghina v. Romania [GC] (dec.), no 42219/07, § 85, 9 July 2015;Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no 44158/98, § 65, ECHR 2004 I;Grosaru v. Romania, no 78039/01, § 47, ECHR 2010;Güler and Uğur v. Turkey, nos. 31706/10 and 33088/10, §§ 47, 50 and 52, 2 December 2014;Gürdeniz v. Turkey (dec.), no 59715/10, § 41, 18 March 2014;Ilaşcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no 48787/99, §§ 461 and 490, ECHR 2004-VII;Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan (infringement proceedings) [GC], no 15172/13, § 182, 29 May 2019;Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no 15172/13, 22 May 2014;Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary [GC], no 47287/15, §§ 167-178, 21 November 2019;Ilıcak v. Turkey, no 15394/02, § 30, 5 April 2007;Ilnseher v. Germany [GC], nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14, §§ 251-256, 4 December 2018;Jėčius v. Lithuania, no 34578/97, § 50, ECHR 2000 IX;Jerusalem v. Austria, no 26958/95, § 36, ECHR 2001 II;Kandjov v. Bulgaria, no 68294/01, § 57, 6 November 2008;Karácsony and Others v. Hungary [GC], nos. 42461/13 and 44357/13, 17 May 2016;Karoussiotis v. Portugal, no 23205/08, §§ 57-76, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Kart v. Turkey [GC], no 8917/05, §§ 42, 85 and 88, ECHR 2009 (extracts);Kavakçı v. Turkey, no 71907/01, §§ 40-41, 5 April 2007;Kavala v. Turkey, no 28749/18, 10 December 2019;Kolevi v. Bulgaria (dec.), no 1108/02, 4 December 2007;Korbely v. Hungary [GC], no 9174/02, § 72, ECHR 2008;Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no 37553/05, § 108, ECHR 2015;Kurić and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no 26828/06, § 259, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Letellier v. France, 26 June 1991, § 34, Series A no 207;Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, § 41, ECHR 2007 IV;Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, §§ 41 and 42, Series A no 103;Lukanov v. Bulgaria, no 21915/93, decision of the Commission of 12 January 1995, Decisions and Reports (DR) 80-B, p. 108;Lütfiye Zengin and Others v. Turkey, no 36443/06, 14 April 2015;Lykourezos v. Greece, no 33554/03, §§ 54-56, ECHR 2006 VIII;Maestri v. Italy [GC], no 39748/98, § 30, ECHR 2004 I;Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary [GC], no 18030/11, § 184, 8 November 2016;Magyar Kétfarkú Kutya Párt v. Hungary [GC], no 201/17, §§ 94-97, 20 January 2020;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, § 67, Series A no 82;Mammadli v. Azerbaijan, no 47145/14, §§ 52 and 104, 19 April 2018;Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, 2 March 1987, §§ 47 and 52, Series A no 113;Mehmet Hasan Altan v. Turkey, no 13237/17, 20 March 2018;Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no 72508/13, §§ 222-225 and 287-317, 28 November 2017;Mergen and Others v. Turkey, nos. 44062/09 and 4 others, § 48, 31 May 2016;Mikolenko v. Estonia (dec.), no 16944/03, 5 January 2006;Molla Sali v. Greece [GC], no 20452/14, §§ 89-91, 19 December 2018;Mooren v. Germany [GC], no 11364/03, § 72, 9 July 2009;Mugemangango v. Belgium [GC], no 310/15, § 67, 10 July 2020;Murray v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1994, § 55, Series A no 300-A;Murtazaliyeva v. Russia [GC], no 36658/05, § 88, 18 December 2018;Mustafa Avci v. Turkey, no 39322/12, § 60, 23 May 2017;Năstase v. Romania (dec.), no 80563/12, § 109, 18 November 2014;Navalnyy v. Russia [GC], nos. 29580/12 and 4 others, 15 November 2018;O’Hara v. the United Kingdom, no 37555/97, §§ 34-35, ECHR 2001 X;Olsson v. Sweden (no 1), 24 March 1988, § 61, Series A no 130;Otegi Mondragon v. Spain, no 2034/07, § 50, ECHR 2011;Paşa Bayraktar and Aydınkaya v. Turkey, no 38337/12, §§ 24-31, 16 May 2017;Pastörs v. Germany, no 55225/14, § 38, 3 October 2019;Patrono, Cascini and Stefanelli v. Italy, no 10180/04, § 61, 20 April 2006;Peraldi v. France (dec.), no 2096/05, 7 April 2009;Piotr Baranowski v. Poland, no 39742/05, §§ 45-46, 2 October 2007;Podkolzina v. Latvia, no 46726/99, § 33, ECHR 2002 II;Poyraz v. Turkey (dec.), no 21235/11, § 53, 17 February 2015;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 119, 20 March 2018;Rahmani and Dineva v. Bulgaria, no 20116/08, §§ 66 and 68, 10 May 2012;Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e Sá v. Portugal [GC], nos. 55391/13 and 2 others, § 109, 6 November 2018;Rasul Jafarov v. Azerbaijan, no 69981/14, § 162, 17 March 2016;Riza and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 48555/10 and 48377/10, § 141, 13 October 2015;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no 47143/06, §§ 228 and 230, ECHR 2015;Rooman v. Belgium [GC], no 18052/11, § 123, 31 January 2019;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no 28341/95, § 52, ECHR 2000-V;S., V. and A. v. Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, § 73, 22 October 2018;Sadak and Others v. Turkey (no 2), nos. 25144/94 and 8 others, §§ 31 and 33, ECHR 2002 IV;Şahin Alpay v. Turkey, no 16538/17, 20 March 2018;Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland [GC], no 931/13, §§ 144-219, 27 June 2017;Scordino v. Italy (no 1) [GC], no 36813/97, §§ 179-180, ECHR 2006 V;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no 56581/00, § 46, ECHR 2006-II;Selmouni v. France [GC], no 25803/94, § 76, ECHR 1999 V;Sılay v. Turkey, no 8691/02, § 27, 5 April 2007;Sobacı v. Turkey, no 26733/02, § 26, 29 November 2007;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760/06, § 143, ECHR 2012;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, § 82, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Tănase v. Moldova [GC], no 7/08, §§ 105 and 154, ECHR 2010;Tomasi v. France, 27 August 1992, § 83, Series A no 241 A;Ulemek v. Croatia, no 21613/16, §§ 72-74, 31 October 2019;Uspaskich v. Lithuania, no 14737/08, § 94, 20 December 2016;Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381/09 and 32684/09, § 52, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Vedat Doğru v. Turkey, no 2469/10, § 37, 5 April 2016;Vučković and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153/11 and 29 others, § 74, 25 March 2014;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no 26083/94, § 54, ECHR 1999 I;Weeks v. the United Kingdom, 2 March 1987, § 40, Series A no 114;Wemhoff v. Germany, 27 June 1968, p. 23, § 9, Series A no 7;Włoch v. Poland, no 27785/95, §§ 108-109, ECHR 2000 XI;Yavuz and Yaylalı v. Turkey, no 12606/11, § 51, 17 December 2013;Yüksel and Others v. Turkey, nos. 55835/09 and 2 others, § 52, 31 May 2016;Ždanoka v. Latvia [GC], no 58278/00, §§ 102 and 115, ECHR 2006 IV;Zollmann v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 62902/00, ECHR 2003 XII
|
Opinion of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) on Articles 216, 299, 301 and 314 of the Turkish Criminal Code;Opinion of the Venice Commission on the suspension of the second paragraph of Article 83 of the Constitution;Memorandum by the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights following his visits to Turkey in 2016;Amnesty International 2017/18 report on the state of the world’s human rights
|
Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already submitted to another international procedure;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-{general} (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Free expression of the opinion of the people;Stand for election);Violation of Article 18+5 - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security;Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Respondent State to take individual measures (Article 46-2 - Individual measures)
|
TRUE
|
28
|
1537916_27012021
|
Abdi Ibrahim v. Norway (no. 15379/16)
|
2021-01-27 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"15379/16"
] |
001-167625
|
ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-167625
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
| 4
|
[
"8",
"8-1",
"9",
"9-1"
] |
[
"NOR"
] |
Communicated
| ||||||
29
|
1537916_27012021
|
Abdi Ibrahim v. Norway (no. 15379/16)
|
2021-01-27 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"15379/16"
] |
001-199382
|
CASE OF ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-199382
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1217JUD001537916
|
CHAMBER
|
2019-12-17 00:00:00
| 4
|
[
"8",
"8-1"
] |
[
"NOR"
] |
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)
|
FALSE
|
|||
30
|
1537916_27012021
|
Abdi Ibrahim v. Norway (no. 15379/16)
|
2021-01-27 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"15379/16"
] |
001-214433
|
CASE OF ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-214433
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1210JUD001537916
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2021-12-10 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"9",
"9-1",
"41"
] |
[
"NOR"
] |
Child Welfare Act of 17 July 1992
|
A.S. v. Norway, no. 60371/15, §§ 59-61, 17 December 2019;Cînța v. Romania, no. 3891/19, § 26, 18 February 2020;Folgerø and Others v. Norway [GC], no. 15472/02, §§ 54 and 100, ECHR 2007 III;Guðmundur Andri Ástráðsson v. Iceland [GC], no. 26374/18, § 311, 1 December 2020;Haddad v. Spain, no. 16572/17, § 79, 18 June 2019;Hernehult v. Norway, no. 14652/16, §§ 61-63, 10 March 2020;Ilnseher v. Germany [GC], nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14, § 100, 4 December 2018;İzzettin Doğan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, §§ 68 and 93, 26 April 2016;Johansen v. Norway (dec.), no. 12750/02, 10 October 2002;K.O. and V.M. v. Norway, no. 64808/16, §§ 59-60, 19 November 2019;Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen and Pedersen v. Denmark, 7 December 1976, § 52, Series A no. 23;Lautsi and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 30814/06, § 59, ECHR 2011 (extracts);M.L. v. Norway, no. 64639/16, §§ 77-81 and 98, 22 December 2020;Nagmetov v. Russia [GC], no. 35589/08, §§ 63 and 85, 30 March 2017;Navalnyy v. Russia [GC], nos. 29580/12 and 4 others, § 102, 15 November 2018;Olsson v. Sweden (no. 1), 24 March 1988, § 95, Series A no. 130;Omorefe v. Spain, no. 69339/16, § 70, 23 June 2020;Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955/06 and 3 others, §§ 53 et seq., ECHR 2011;Pedersen and Others v. Norway, no. 39710/15, §§ 60-62, 10 March 2020;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 126, 20 March 2018;Socialist Party and Others v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, § 41, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, § 48, ECHR 2005-X;Strand Lobben and Others v. Norway [GC], no. 37283/13, 10 September 2019;Tennenbaum v. Sweden (dec.) no. 16031/90, 3 May 1993;X v. the United Kingdom, no. 7626/76, 11 July 1977;Y.I. v. Russia, no. 68868/14, §§ 75-78, 25 February 2020;Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, § 57, Series A no. 44
|
Article 20(3) of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child adopted on 20 November 1989
|
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) read in the light of Article 9 - (Art. 9) Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion);Non-pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
31
|
1648312_22062016
|
Khlaifia and Others v. Italy (no. 16483/12)
|
2016-06-22 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"16483/12"
] |
001-157277
|
CASE OF KHLAIFIA AND OTHERS v. ITALY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-157277
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0901JUD001648312
|
CHAMBER
|
2015-09-01 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"3",
"5",
"5-1",
"5-1-f",
"5-2",
"5-4",
"13",
"13+3",
"13+P4-4",
"35",
"41",
"P4-4"
] |
[
"ITA"
] |
Articles 10 § 2 (b) and 14 of Legislative Decree no. 286 of 1998
|
A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 3455/05, §§ 162-163, ECHR 2009;Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey, no 30471/08, 22 September 2009;Adam and Others v. Germany (dec.), no 290/03, 1 September 2005;Allan v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 48539/99, 28 August 2001;Alver v. Estonia, no 64812/01, § 50, 8 November 2005;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III;Andrei Frolov v. Russia, no 205/02, §§ 47-49, 29 March 2007;Athary v. Turkey, no 50372/09, § 36, 11 December 2012;Babushkin v. Russia, no 67253/01, § 44, 18 October 2007;Baranowski v. Poland, no 28358/95, ECHR 2000-III;Belevitskiy v. Russia, no 72967/01, §§ 73-79, 1 March 2007;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V;Čonka v. Belgium, no 51564/99, §§ 61-63, ECHR 2002-I;Dbouba v. Turkey, no 15916/09, § 54, 13 July 2010;De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands, 22 May 1984, § 60, Series A no 77;De Souza Ribeiro v. France [GC], no 22689/07, § 82, ECHR 2012;Dhahbi v. Italy, no 17120/09, § 24, 8 April 2014;Dougoz v. Greece, nº 40907/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-II;E. v. Norway, 29 August 1990, § 50, Series A no 181-A;Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. the United Kingdom, 30 August 1990, § 40, Series A no 182;G.C. v. Italy, no 73869/10, § 36, 22 April 2014;Giulia Manzoni v. Italy, 1 July 1997, § 25, Reports 1997-IV;Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, §§ 92-93, Series A no 39;Herczegfalvy v. Austria, 24 September 1992, § 63, Series A no 244;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no 27765/09, § 183, ECHR 2012;Hutchison Reid v. the United Kingdom, no 50272/99, § 79, ECHR 2003-IV;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no 25;István Gábor Kovács v. Hungary, no 15707/10, § 26, 17 January 2012;Ječius v. Lithuania, no 34578/97, § 56, ECHR 2000-IX;Kadikis v. Latvia, no 62393/00, § 55, 4 May 2006;Kalashnikov v. Russia, no 47095/99, § 102, ECHR 2002-VI;Kantyrev v. Russia, no 37213/02, §§ 50-51, 21 June 2007;Karalevičius v. Lithuania, no 53254/99, § 39, 7 April 2005;Kehayov v. Bulgaria, no 41035/98, § 64, 18 January 2005;Khudoyorov v. Russia, no 6847/02, §§ 106-107, ECHR 2005-X (extracts);Kudła v. Poland [GC], no 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI;L.M. v. Slovenia, no 32863/05, § 121, 12 June 2014;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772/95, § 121, ECHR 2000-IV;M.S. v. Belgium, no 50012/08, § 122, 31 January 2012;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no 30696/09, § 388, ECHR 2011;Mahdid and Haddar v. Austria (dec.), no 74762/01, 8 December 2005;Moghaddas v. Turkey, no 46134/08, § 46, 15 February 2011;Moiseyev v. Russia, no 62936/00, 9 October 2008;Mooren v. Germany [GC], no 11364/03, § 76, 9 July 2009;Mouisel v. France, no 67263/01, § 37, ECHR 2002-IX;Musaev v. Turkey, no 72754/11, 21 October 2014;N.C. v. Italy [GC], no 24952/94, § 44, ECHR 2002-X;Nasrulloyev v. Russia, no 656/06, § 77, 11 October 2007;Naumenko v. Ukraine, no 42023/98, § 108, 10 February 2004;Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no 31195/96, § 69, ECHR 1999-II;Novoselov v. Russia, no 66460/01, §§ 32 and 40-43, 2 June 2005;Peers v. Greece, no 28524/95, §§ 68 and 74, ECHR 2001-III;Price v. the United Kingdom, no 33394/96, § 24, ECHR 2001-VII;Rahimi v. Greece, no 8687/08, § 60, 5 April 2011;Raninen v. Finland, 16 December 1997, § 55, Reports 1997-VIII;Riad and Idiab v. Belgium, nos. 29787/03 and 29810/03, § 100, 24 January 2008;Ruiz Rivera v. Switzerland, no 8300/06, § 47, 18 February 2014;S.D. v. Greece, no 53541/07, § 76, 11 June 2009;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no 37201/06, § 131, ECHR 2008;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 13229/03, § 43, ECHR 2008;Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no 36378/02, ECHR 2005 III;Shtukaturov v. Russia, no 44009/05, § 123, ECHR 2008;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 88, Series A no 161;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760/06, ECHR 2012;Sulejmanovic v. Italy, no 22635/03, § 43, 16 July 2009;Vachev v. Bulgaria, no 42987/98, § 71, ECHR 2004-VIII;Van der Leer v. the Netherlands, 21 February 1990, § 28, Series A no 170-A;Velinov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no 16880/08, § 49, 19 September 2013;Vlasov v. Russia, no 78146/01, § 84, 12 June 2008;Weeks v. the United Kingdom, 2 March 1987, § 61, Series A no 114;Witold Litwa v. Poland, no 26629/95, § 78, ECHR 2000-III
|
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-f - Expulsion);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-2 - Information on reasons for arrest;Prompt information);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens-{general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Prohibition of torture);Violation of Article 13+P4-4 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens-{general};Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
|
32
|
1648312_22062016
|
Khlaifia and Others v. Italy (no. 16483/12)
|
2016-06-22 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"16483/12"
] |
001-170054
|
CASE OF KHLAIFIA AND OTHERS v. ITALY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170054
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1215JUD001648312
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2016-12-15 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"3",
"5",
"5-1",
"5-1-f",
"5-2",
"5-4",
"13",
"13+3",
"13+P4-4",
"41",
"P4-4"
] |
[
"ITA"
] |
Article 10 § 4 of Legislative Decree no. 286 of 1998 providing “Consolidated text of provisions concerning immigration regulations and rules on the status of aliens” ; Article 13 of the Italian Constitution
|
A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 3455/05, §§ 162-163, ECHR 2009;A.A. v. Greece, no 12186/08, §§ 57-65, 22 July 2010;A.F. v. Greece, no 53709/11, §§ 71-80, 13 June 2013;Aarabi v. Greece, no 39766/09, §§ 42-51, 2 April 2015;Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey, no 30471/08, 22 September 2009;Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, § 61, Reports 1996 VI;Alver v. Estonia, no 64812/01, § 50, 8 November 2005;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III;Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 142-145, 10 January 2012;Andrei Frolov v. Russia, no 205/02, §§ 47-49, 29 March 2007;Andric v. Sweden (dec.), no 45917/99, 23 February 1999;B.M. v. Greece, no 53608/11, §§ 67-70, 19 December 2013;Babushkin v. Russia, no 67253/01, § 44, 18 October 2007;Baranowski v. Poland, no 28358/95, ECHR 2000-III;Belevitskiy v. Russia, no 72967/01, §§ 73-79, 1 March 2007;Berisha and Haljiti v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no 18670/03, 16 June 2005;Blokhin v. Russia [GC], no 47152/06, §§ 164-172, ECHR 2016;Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no 23380/09, §§ 81-90, ECHR 2015;Brega v. Moldova, no 52100/08, 20 April 2010;Bubullima v. Greece, no 41533/08, § 27, 28 October 2010;C.D. and Others v. Greece, nos. 33441/10, 33468/10 and 33476/10, §§ 49-54, 19 December 2013;Căşuneanu v. Romania, no 22018/10, § 60-62, 16 April 2013;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V;Chamaïev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no 36378/02, ECHR 2005-III;Čonka v. Belgium, no 51564/99, ECHR 2002-I;D.L. v. Bulgaria, no 7472/14, §§ 6 and 69-71, 19 May 2016;Davydov v. Estonia (dec.), no 16387/03, 31 May 2005;Dbouba v. Turkey, no 15916/09, § 54, 13 July 2010;De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands, 22 May 1984, § 60, Series A no 77;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, 18 June 1971, §§ 67-70, Series A no 12;De Souza Ribeiro v. France [GC], no. 22689/07, ECHR 2012;Del Río Prada v. Spain [GC], no 42750/09, § 125, ECHR 2013;Delbec v. France, no 43125/98, § 33, 18 June 2002;Denisenko and Bogdanchikov v. Russia, no 3811/02, § 83, 12 February 2009;Dougoz v. Greece, nº 40907/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-II;Dritsas v. Italy (dec.), no 2344/02, 1 February 2011;E. v. Norway, 29 August 1990, Series A no 181-A;Efremidze v. Greece, no 33225/08, §§ 36-42, 21 June 2011;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no 39630/09, § 195, ECHR 2012;F.H. v. Greece, no. 78456/11, 31 July 2014;Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. the United Kingdom, 30 August 1990, § 40, Series A no 182;Fuchser v. Switzerland, no 55894/00, § 43, 13 July 2006;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978/05, §§ 87-92, ECHR 2010;Gavrilovici v. Moldova, no 25464/05, 15 December 2009;Georgia v. Russia (I) [GC], no 13255/07, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Ghulami v. France (dec.), no 45302/05, 7 April 2009;Giulia Manzoni v. Italy, 1 July 1997, § 25, Reports 1997-IV;Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, §§ 92-93, Series A no 39;Ha.A. v. Greece, no 58387/11, §§ 26-31, 21 April 2016;Herczegfalvy v. Austria, 24 September 1992, § 63, Series A no 244;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no 27765/09, ECHR 2012;Hutchison Reid v. the United Kingdom, no 50272/99, § 79, ECHR 2003-IV;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no 25;István Gábor Kovács v. Hungary, no 15707/10, § 26, 17 January 2012;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no 54810/00, § 67, ECHR 2006-IX;Ječius v. Lithuania, no 34578/97, § 56, ECHR 2000-IX;Kadikis v. Latvia, no 62393/00, § 55, 4 May 2006;Kalashnikov v. Russia, no 47095/99, § 102, ECHR 2002-VI;Kanagaratnam and Others v. Belgium, no 15297/09, § 80, 13 December 2011;Kantyrev v. Russia, no 37213/02, §§ 50-51, 21 June 2007;Karalevičius v. Lithuania, no 53254/99, § 39, 7 April 2005;Kehayov v. Bulgaria, no 41035/98, § 64, 18 January 2005;Khudoyorov v. Russia, no 6847/02, §§ 106-107, ECHR 2005-X (extracts);Koktysh v. Ukraine, no 43707/07, §§ 22 and 91-95, 10 December 2009;Kudła v. Poland [GC], no 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI;L.M. v. Slovenia, no 32863/05, 12 June 2014;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772/95, § 170, ECHR 2000-IV;Lavrentiadis v. Greece, no 29896/13, § 45, 22 September 2015;Luberti v. Italy, 23 February 1984, §§ 33-37, Series A no 75;M.A. v. Cyprus, no 41872/10, ECHR 2013;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no 30696/09, §§ 217-234, ECHR 2011;Mahdid and Haddar v. Austria (dec.), no 74762/01, 8 December 2005;Medvedyev and Others v. France [GC], no 3394/03, § 73, ECHR 2010;Mete and Others v. Turkey, no 294/08, § 112, 4 October 2012;Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, § 315, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Moisseiev v. Russia, no 62936/00, §§ 124-127, 9 October 2008;Mooren v. Germany [GC], no 11364/03, § 76, 9 July 2009;Mouisel v. France, no 67263/01, § 37, ECHR 2002-IX;Mubilanzila Mayeka and Kaniki Mitunga v. Belgium, no 13178/03, §§ 53-54, ECHR 2006-XI;Mursič v. Croatia [GC], no 7334/13, 20 October 2016;Musaev v. Turkey, no 72754/11, § 40, 21 October 2014;N.C. v. Italy [GC], no 24952/94, § 44, ECHR 2002-X;Naumenko v. Ukraine, no 42023/98, § 108, 10 February 2004;Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no 31195/96, § 69, ECHR 1999-II;Novoselov v. Russia, no 66460/01, §§ 32 and 40-43, 2 June 2005;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no 21722/11, § 219, ECHR 2013;Paladi v. Moldova [GC], no 39806/05, § 74, 10 March 2009;Peers v. Greece, no 28524/95, §§ 68 and 74, ECHR 2001 III;Popov v. France, nos. 39472/07 and 39474/07, 19 January 2012;Price v. the United Kingdom, no 33394/96, § 24, ECHR 2001-VII;R.U. v. Greece, no 2237/08, §§ 62-64, 7 June 2011;Rahimi v. Greece, no 8687/08, §§ 60-62, 5 April 2011;Ramirez Sanchez v. France [GC], no 59450/00, § 117, ECHR 2006-IX;Riad and Idiab v. Belgium, nos. 29787/03 and 29810/03, § 100, 24 January 2008;Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 34, Series A no 336;Rivas v. France, no 59584/00, § 38, 1 April 2004;Ruiz Rivera v. Switzerland, no 8300/06, § 47, 18 February 2014;S.D. v. Greece, no 53541/07, 11 June 2009;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 13229/03, § 43, ECHR 2008;Salman v. Turkey [GC], no 21986/93, §§ 99-100, ECHR 2000-VII;Selmouni v. France [GC], no 25803/94, ECHR 1999-V;Sharifi and Others v. Italy and Greece, no 16643/09, § 188, 21 October 2014;Shtukaturov v. Russia, no 44009/05, § 123, ECHR 2008;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760/06, ECHR 2012;Steel and Others v. the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998, § 54, Reports 1998-VII;Sulejmanovic v. Italy, no 22635/03, § 43, 16 July 2009;Sultani v. France, no 45223/05, ECHR 2007 IV;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, §§ 113-114, ECHR 2014 (extracts);T. and A. v. Turkey, no 47146/11, 21 October 2014;Tabesh v. Greece, no 8256/07, §§ 38-44, 26 November 2009;Tarakhel v. Switzerland [GC], no 29217/12, §§ 93-122, ECHR 2014;Tomasi v. France, 27 August 1992, § 110, Series A no 241-A;Torreggiani and Others v. Italy, nos. 43517/09, 46882/09, 55400/09, 57875/09, 61535/09, 35315/10 and 37818/10, §§ 68-69, 8 January 2013;Turan Çakır v. Belgium, no 44256/06, § 54, 10 March 2009;Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, § 32, Series A no 26;V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 24888/94, § 71, ECHR 1999 IX;Vachev v. Bulgaria, no 42987/98, § 71, ECHR 2004-VIII;Van der Leer v. the Netherlands, 21 February 1990, §§ 27-28, Series A no 170-A;Vasyukov v. Russia, no 2974/05, § 59, 5 April 2011;Velinov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no 16880/08, § 49, 19 September 2013;Vlasov v. Russia, no 78146/01, § 84, 12 June 2008;Weeks v. the United Kingdom, 2 March 1987, § 61, Series A no 114;Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, § 39, Series A no 33;Witold Litwa v. Poland, no 26629/95, § 60, ECHR 2000-III;Z. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 29392/95, § 73, ECHR 2001-V
|
Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 (the “Return Directive”) “on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals”;Bilateral agreement of 5 April 2011 between Italy and Tunisia;Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly (PACE) report “on the large-scale arrival of irregular migrants, asylum-seekers and refugees on Europe’s southern shores”, published on 30 September 2011;“Draft articles on the expulsion of aliens” adopted by the International Law Commission at its sixty-sixth session (2014), and of which the United Nations General Assembly took note by its Resolution A/RES/69/119 of 10 December 2014
|
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-f - Expulsion);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-2 - Information on reasons for arrest;Prompt information);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens-{general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Prohibition of torture);No violation of Article 13+P4-4 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens-{general};Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
33
|
1657408_04042012
|
Fabris v. France (no. 16574/08) Article 41 - Just satisfaction
|
2012-04-04 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"16574/08"
] |
001-105773
|
CASE OF FABRIS v. FRANCE
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105773
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0721JUD001657408
|
CHAMBER
|
2011-07-21 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"14",
"14+P1-1",
"P1-1",
"P1-1-1"
] |
[
"FRA"
] |
Articles 745, 757, 760 and 1075 -1077 of the Civil code ; Article 15 of Law no.2001-1135 of 3 December 2001 "on the rights of the surviving spouse and children born of adultery and modernising various provisions of the law of succession"
|
Alboize-Barthes and Alboize-Montezume v. France (dec.), no 44421/04, 21 October 2008;Blecic v. Croatia ([GC], no 59532/00, ECHR 2006-III;Brauer v. Germany, no 3545/04, 28 May 2009;De Diego Nafría v. Spain, no 46833/99, § 39, 14 March 2002;E.S. v. France (dec.), 10 February 2009, no 49714/06;Inze v. Austria, 28 October 1987, Series A no 126;Kopecký v. Slovakia (no 44912/98 [CG], § 38, ECHR 2004-IX);Larkos v. Cyprus [GC], no 29515/95, §§ 30-31, ECHR 1999-I;Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no 33071/96, ECHR 2000-XII;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, Series A no 31;Mazurek v. France, no 34406/97, ECHR 2000-II;Merger and Cros v. France, no 68864/01, 22 December 2004;Ostojic v. Croatia (dec.), no 16837/02, ECHR 2002-IX;Pla and Puncernau v. Andorra, no 69498/01, ECHR 2004-VIII;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, ECHR 2005-X
|
No violation of Art. 14+P1-1
|
TRUE
|
|
34
|
1657408_04042012
|
Fabris v. France (no. 16574/08) Article 41 - Just satisfaction
|
2012-04-04 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"16574/08"
] |
001-116716
|
CASE OF FABRIS v. FRANCE
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-116716
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0207JUD001657408
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2013-02-07 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"14",
"14+P1-1",
"41",
"46",
"46-1",
"46-2",
"P1-1",
"P1-1-1"
] |
[
"FRA"
] |
Section 25(2) of the 2001 Law ; Articles 1077-1 and 1077-2 of the Civil Code
|
Alboize-Barthes and Alboize-Montezume v. France (dec.), no 44421/04, 21 October 2008;Albu and Others v. Romania, no 34796/09 et seq., § 34, 10 May 2012;Ališic and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia and“the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” (dec.), no 60642/08, § 52, 17 October 2011;Andrejeva v. Latvia [GC], no 55707/00, ECHR 2009;Antoni v. the Czech Republic, no 18010/06, 25 November 2010;Association nationale des pupilles de la Nation v. France (dec.), no 22718/08, 6 October 2009;Beian v. Romania (no 1), no 30658/05, § 39, ECHR 2007-V (extracts);Beyeler v. Italy [GC], no 33202/96, § 100, ECHR 2000-I;Bozcaada Kimisis Teodoku Rum Ortodoks Kilisesi Vakfi v. Turkey, nos. 37639/03, 37655/03, 26736/04 and 42670/04, § 41, 3 March 2009;Brauer v. Germany, no 3545/04, 28 May 2009;Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no 28342/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-VII;Camp and Bourimi v. the Netherlands, no 28369/95, ECHR 2000-X;Compagnie des gaz de pétrole Primagaz v. France, no 29613/08, § 18, 21 December 2010;Depalle v. France [GC], no 34044/02, ECHR 2010;Di Marco v. Italy (merits), no 32521/05, § 50, 26 April 2011;E.S. v. France (dec.), no 49714/06, 10 February 2009;Inze v. Austria, 28 October 1987, Series A no 126;Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 18 December 1986, Series A no 112;Karaman v. Turkey, no 6489/03, § 30, 15 January 2008;Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no 30078/06, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Kopecký v. Slovakia [GC], no 44912/98, ECHR 2004-IX;Larkos v. Cyprus [GC], no 29515/95, §§ 30-31, ECHR 1999-I;Magnin v. France (dec.), no 26219/08, 10 May 2012;Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no 33071/96, ECHR 2000-XII;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, Series A no 31;Mazurek v. France, no 34406/97, 1 February 2000, ECHR 2000-II;Merger and Cros v. France, no 68864/01, 22 December 2004;Mork v. Germany, nos. 31047/04 and 43386/08, §§ 28 to 30 and 54, 9 June 2011;Nejdet Sahin and Perihan Sahin v. Turkey [GC], no 13279/05, §§ 56-57, 20 October 2011;Nerva and Others v. the United Kingdom, no 42295/98, § 43, ECHR 2002-VIII;Padovani v. Italy, 26 February 1993, § 24, Series A no 257-B;Petrovic v. Austria, 27 March 1998, § 22, Reports 1998-II;Pla and Puncernau v. Andorra, no 69498/01, ECHR 2004-VIII;Plalam S.P.A. v. Italy (merits), no 16021/02, § 37, 18 May 2010;Pressos Companía Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium, 20 November 1995, § 31, Series A no 332;Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no 42527/98, § 85, ECHR 2001-VIII;Saghinadze and Others v. Georgia, no 18768/05, § 103, 27 May 2010;Salah v. the Netherlands, no 8196/02, § 77, ECHR 2006-IX (extracts);Slivenko and Others v. Latvia (dec.) [GC], no 48321/99, § 121, ECHR 2002-II (extracts);Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, § 55, ECHR 2005-X;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, §§ 51 and 52, ECHR 2006-VI;Stretch v. the United Kingdom, no 44277/98, § 32, 24 June 2003;Taron v. Germany (dec.), no 53126/07, 29 May 2012;Van Raalte v. the Netherlands, 21 February 1997, § 33, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no 2) [GC], no 32772/02, § 61, ECHR 2009;Vermeire v. Belgium, 29 November 1991, Series A no 214-C;Wagner and J.M.W.L. v. Luxembourg, no 76240/01, § 96, 28 June 2007;Zarb Adami v. Malta, no 17209/02, § 42, ECHR 2006-VIII
|
Violation of Article 14+P1-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property);Just satisfaction reserved
|
TRUE
|
|
35
|
1657408_04042012
|
Fabris v. France (no. 16574/08) Article 41 - Just satisfaction
|
2012-04-04 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"16574/08"
] |
001-122353
|
CASE OF FABRIS v. FRANCE
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122353
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0628JUD001657408
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2013-06-28 00:00:00
| 2
|
[
"37",
"37-1-b",
"39"
] |
[
"FRA"
] |
Struck out of the list (Article 37-1-b - Matter resolved)
|
TRUE
|
|||
36
|
1715311_15052013
|
Vučković and Others v. Serbia (no. 17153/11)
|
2013-05-15 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"17153/11"
] |
001-112706
|
CASE OF VUČKOVIĆ AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-112706
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0828JUD001715311
|
CHAMBER
|
2012-08-28 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"14",
"14+P1-1",
"35",
"35-1",
"41",
"46",
"46-2",
"P1-1",
"P1-1-1"
] |
[
"SRB"
] |
Article 360 § 3 of the Obligations Act ; Memorandum of 16 March 2009
|
Adamsons v. Latvia, no. 3669/03, § 118, 24 June 2008;Atanasovski v. “the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”, no. 36815/03, § 38, 14 January 2010;Balogh v. Hungary, no. 47940/99, § 30, 20 July 2004;Beian v. Romania (no. 1), no. 30658/05, § …, ECHR 2007-V (extracts);Belgium” v. Belgium (Merits) (judgment of 23 July 1968, Series A no. 6, § 9);Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378/05, ECHR 2008-;Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184/05, § 66, ECHR 2010;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, § 175, ECHR 2007;Dalia v. France, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, pp. 87-88, § 38;Dankevich v. Ukraine, no. 40679/98, § 107, 29 April 2003;García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I;Iordan Iordanov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 23530/02, § 49-50, 2 July 2009;Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen and Pedersen v. Denmark, 7 December 1976, § 56, Series A no. 23;Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, § 15, ECHR 2002-VIII;Nejdet Sahin and Perihan Sahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 13279/05, 20 October 2011;Paduraru v. Romania, § 98, no. 63252/00, ECHR 2005-XII (extracts);Santos Pinto v. Portugal, no. 39005/04, § 41, 20 May 2008;Savez crkava “Rijec života” and Others v. Croatia, no. 7798/08, §§ 114 and 115, 9 December 2010;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII;Stefan and Stef v. Romania, nos. 24428/03 and 26977/03, §§ 33-36, 27 January 2009;Stefanica and Others v. Romania, no. 38155/02, § …, 2 November 2010;Tomic and Others v. Montenegro, nos. 18650/09 and others, § 57, 17 April 2012, not yet final;Tudor Tudor v. Romania, no. 21911/03, 24 March 2009;Unédic v. France, no. 20153/04, § 74, 18 December 2008;Vernillo v. France, judgment of 20 February 1991, Series A no. 198, pp. 11-12, § 27;Vincic and Others v. Serbia, nos. 44698/06 and others, 1 December 2009;Willis v. United Kingdom, no. 36042/97, § 36, ECHR 2002-IV
|
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 14+P1-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property;Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46-2 - Measures of a general character);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - claim dismissed
|
TRUE
|
|
37
|
1715311_15052013
|
Vučković and Others v. Serbia (no. 17153/11)
|
2013-05-15 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"17153/11"
] |
001-142199
|
CASE OF VUČKOVIĆ AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142199
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325JUD001715311
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2014-03-25 00:00:00
| 2
|
[
"35",
"35-1"
] |
[
"SRB"
] |
Sections 199, 200, 371 and 376 §§ 1-2 of the Obligations Act ; Rules on Travel and Other Expenses in the Yugoslav Army ; Articles 18, 21, 32 and 36 of the Constitution; Section 43 of the Prohibition of Discrimination Act
|
A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579/05, § 142, ECHR 2010;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports 1996 IV;Anđelković v. Serbia, no. 1401/08, § 24, 9 April 2013;Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, § 32, ECHR 2004 III;Balogh v. Hungary, no. 47940/99, § 30, 20 July 2004;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378/05, § 42, ECHR 2008;Cardot v. France, 19 March 1991, § 34, Series A no. 200;Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, § 32, Series A no. 236;D v. Ireland (dec.), no. 26499/02, § 85, 28 June 2006;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, §§ 117 and 118, ECHR 2007 IV;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, § 69, ECHR 2010;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 37, ECHR 1999 I;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, §§ 144 and 146, ECHR 2010;Hajnal v. Serbia, no. 36937/06, §§ 122 and 123, 19 June 2012;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, §§ 140-41, ECHR 2001-VII;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 107, 10 September 2010;Odièvre v. France [GC], no. 42326/98, § 22, ECHR 2003-III;Pérez de Rada Cavanilles v. Spain, 28 October 1998, § 43;Perna v. Italy [GC], no. 48898/99, §§ 23-24, ECHR 2003-V;Rakić and Others v. Serbia, no. 47460/07 and others, § 39, 5 October 2010;Ringeisen v. Austria, 16 July 1971, § 89, Series A no. 13;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 70, 17 September 2009;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 46, ECHR 2006 II;Thiermann and Others v. Norway (dec.), no. 18712/03, 8 March 2007;Van Oosterwijck, judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 40, pp. 16-17, §§ 33-34;Vinčić and Others v. Serbia, nos. 44698/06 and others, § 51, 1 December 2009;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, § 54, ECHR 1999 I
|
Preliminary objection allowed (Article 35-1 - Effective domestic remedy)
|
TRUE
|
|
38
|
1722411_31082016
|
Medžlis Islamske zajednice Brčko and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (no. 17224/11)
|
2016-08-31 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"17224/11"
] |
001-141569
|
MEDZLIS ISLAMSKE ZAJEDNICE BRCKO I DRUGI v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-141569
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
| 4
|
[
"10",
"10-1"
] |
[
"BIH"
] | |||||||
39
|
1722411_31082016
|
Medžlis Islamske zajednice Brčko and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (no. 17224/11)
|
2016-08-31 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"17224/11"
] |
001-157760
|
CASE OF MEDŽLIS ISLAMSKE ZAJEDNICE BRČKO AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-157760
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1013JUD001722411
|
CHAMBER
|
2015-10-13 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2"
] |
[
"BIH"
] |
Section 6 of the Defamation Act 2003
|
Busuioc v. Moldova, no. 61513/00, § 88, 21 December 2004;De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, no. 19983/92, § 47, 24 February 1997;Janowski v. Poland [GC], no. 25716/94, § 33, ECHR 1999 I;Jerusalem v. Austria, no. 26958/95, § 42, ECHR 2001 II;Kazakov v. Russia, no. 1758/02, 18 December 2008;Lešník v. Slovakia, no. 35640/97, § 53, ECHR 2003 IV;Mouvement raëlien suisse v. Switzerland [GC], no. 16354/06, § 48, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Savitchi v. Moldova, no. 11039/02, § 59, 11 October 2005;Siryk v. Ukraine, no. 6428/07, § 42, 31 March 2011;Sofranschi v. Moldova, no. 34690/05, §§ 28-32, 21 December 2010;Zakharov v. Russia, no. 14881/03, § 23, 5 October 2006
|
No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)
|
TRUE
|
|
40
|
1722411_31082016
|
Medžlis Islamske zajednice Brčko and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (no. 17224/11)
|
2016-08-31 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"17224/11"
] |
001-175180
|
CASE OF MEDŽLIS ISLAMSKE ZAJEDNICE BRČKO AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-175180
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0627JUD001722411
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2017-06-27 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"8",
"8-2",
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2"
] |
[
"BIH"
] |
Section 6 of the Defamation Act
|
A. v. Norway, no. 28070/06, 9 April 2009;Albert-Engelmann-Gesellschaft mbH v. Austria, no. 46389/99, § 30, 19 January 2006;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876/08, § 103, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Aurelian Oprea v. Romania, no. 12138/08, § 59, 19 January 2016;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, § 83, 7 February 2012;Bédat v. Switzerland [GC], no. 56925/08, § 48, ECHR 2016;Bergens Tidende and Others v. Norway, no. 26132/95, § 57, ECHR 2000 IV;Bezymyannyy v. Russia, no. 10941/03, § 41, 8 April 2010;Björk Eiðsdóttir v. Iceland, no. 46443/09, §§ 67-68, 10 July 2012;Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, §§ 63-66, ECHR 1999 III;Bucur and Toma v. Romania, no. 40238/02, § 93, 8 January 2013;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433/09, § 140, ECHR 2012;Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556/94, § 37, ECHR 1999 IV;Chauvy and Others v. France, no. 64915/01, § 78, ECHR 2004-VI;Couderc and Hachette Filipacchi Associés v. France [GC], no. 40454/07, §§ 90-93, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569/09, § 121, ECHR 2015;Dorota Kania v. Poland (no. 2), no. 44436/13, § 73, 4 October 2016;Erla Hlynsdόttir v. Iceland, no. 43380/10, § 65, 10 July 2012;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 54, ECHR 1999 I;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, 27 March 1996, § 39, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 II;Guja v. Moldova [GC], no. 14277/04, § 70, ECHR 2008;Heinisch v. Germany, no. 28274/08, § 64, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Janowski v. Poland [GC], no. 25716/94, ECHR 1999 I;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, §§ 140-41, ECHR 2001 VII;Karácsony and Others v. Hungary [GC], no. 42461/13, § 124, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Kazakov v. Russia, no. 1758/02, § 28, 18 December 2008;Korbely v. Hungary [GC], no. 9174/02, §§ 72-73, ECHR 2008;Lešník v. Slovakia, no. 35640/97, ECHR 2003 IV;Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 30, ECHR 2004-I;Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030/11, § 166, 8 November 2016;Morice v. France [GC], no. 29369/10, § 131, ECHR 2015;Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 10511/10, § 88, ECHR 2016;Nikowitz and Verlagsgruppe News GmbH v. Austria, no. 5266/03, §§ 25-26, 22 February 2007;Nikula v. Finland, no. 31611/96, §§ 44 and 46, ECHR 2002 II;Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC], no. 49017/99, § 87, ECHR 2004 XI;Pentikäinen v. Finland [GC], no. 11882/10, § 81, ECHR 2015;Perinçek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510/08, § 198, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Pfeifer v. Austria, no. 12556/03, §§ 47-48, 15 November 2007;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 52, ECHR 2000-V;Sanchez Cardenas v. Norway, no. 12148/03, §§ 37-39, 4 October 2007;Sidabras and Džiautas v. Lithuania, nos. 55480/00 and 59330/00, § 49, ECHR 2004 VIII;Siryk v. Ukraine, no. 6428/07, § 42, 31 March 2011;Sofranschi v. Moldova, no. 34690/05, § 29, 21 December 2010;Stankiewicz and Others v. Poland, no. 48723/07, § 61, 14 October 2014;Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, § 89, ECHR 2005 II;Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 64, ECHR 1999 IV;Tammer v. Estonia, no. 41205/98, § 69, ECHR 2001 I;Thoma v. Luxembourg, no. 38432/97, ECHR 2001 III;Thorgeir Thorgeirson v. Iceland, 25 June 1992, § 65, Series A no. 239;Tønsbergs Blad A.S. and Haukom v. Norway, no. 510/04, 1 March 2007;Verdens Gang and Aase v. Norway (dec.), no. 45710/99, ECHR 2001 X;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, §§ 104-113, ECHR 2012;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, § 54, ECHR 1999 I;White v. Sweden, no. 42435/02, § 25, 19 September 2006;Zakharov v. Russia, no. 14881/03, 5 October 2006
|
Code of Ethics and Conduct for NGOs, World Association of Non Governmental Organisations (WANGO), 2004
|
No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)
|
TRUE
|
41
|
1750207_08042015
|
Avotiņš v. Latvia (no. 17502/07)
|
2015-04-08 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"17502/07"
] |
001-141644
|
CASE OF AVOTIŅŠ v. LATVIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-141644
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0225JUD001750207
|
CHAMBER
|
2014-02-25 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"35",
"35-1",
"35-3-b"
] |
[
"LVA"
] |
Sections 637 and 644 of the Latvian Civil Procedure Law
|
Bosphorus Hava Yolları Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi v. Ireland [GC], no 45036/98, ECHR 2005 VI;Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no 62543/00, § 56, ECHR 2004 III;Grišankova and Grišankovs v. Latvia (dec.), no 36117/02, ECHR 2003 II;S.J. v. Luxembourg, no 34471/04, § 52, 4 March 2008;Joos v. Switzerland, no 43245/07, § 19, 15 November 2012;Liepājnieks v. Latvia (dec.), no 37586/06, § 73, 2 November 2010;McDonald v. France (dec.), no 18648/04, 29 April 2008;Michaud v. France, no 12323/11, § 100, ECHR 2012;Miholapa v. Latvia, no 61655/00, § 23, 31 May 2007;Orams v. Cyprus (dec.), no 27841/07, 10 June 2010;Övüş v. Turkey, no 42981/04, § 47, 13 October 2009;Pellegrini v. Italy, no 30882/96, §§ 40-41, 2001 VIII;Sancho Cruz and 14 other « Agrarian Reform » cases v. Portugal, nos. 8851/07, 8854/07, 8856/07, 8865/07, 10142/07, 10144/07, 24622/07, 32733/07, 32744/07, 41645/07, 19150/08, 22885/08, 22887/08, 26612/08 and 202/09, §§ 33-35, 18 January 2011;Savičs v. Latvia, no 17892/03, §§ 113-114, 27 November 2012;Shefer v. Russia (dec.), no 45175/04, §§ 24-25, 13 March 2012;Sholokhov v. Armenia and Moldova, no 40358/05, § 66, 31 July 2012
|
Articles 33-36, 38 et 54 of the Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and and commercial matters (“Brussels I Regulation”)
|
Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-3-b - No significant disadvantage);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Equality of arms)
|
TRUE
|
42
|
1750207_08042015
|
Avotiņš v. Latvia (no. 17502/07)
|
2015-04-08 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"17502/07"
] |
001-163114
|
CASE OF AVOTIŅŠ v. LATVIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163114
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0523JUD001750207
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2016-05-23 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"6",
"6-1"
] |
[
"LVA"
] |
Section 230(1) of the Latvian Civil Procedure Law
|
Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Bosphorus Hava Yolları Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi v. Ireland [GC], no. 45036/98, ECHR 2005 VI;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433/09, § 197, ECHR 2012;Dhahbi v. Italy, no. 17120/09, §§ 31-34, 8 April 2014;Drozd and Janousek v. France and Spain, 26 June 1992, § 110, Series A no. 240;García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I;Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no. 62543/00, § 56, ECHR 2004-III;Hussin v. Belgium (dec.), no. 70807/01, 6 May 2004;Jeunesse v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 12738/10, § 110, 3 October 2014;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696/09, § 338, ECHR 2011;McDonald v. France (dec.), no. 18648/04, 29 April 2008;Michaud v. France, no. 12323/11, ECHR 2012;Miholapa v. Latvia, no. 61655/00, § 23, 31 May 2007;Naydenov v. Bulgaria, no. 17353/03, § 50, 26 November 2009;Övüş v. Turkey, no. 42981/04, § 47, 13 October 2009;Pellegrini v. Italy, no. 30882/96, §§ 40-41, ECHR 2001 VIII;Povse v. Austria (dec.), no. 3890/11, 18 June 2013;Robba v. Germany, no. 20999/92, Commission decision of 28 February 1996;S.J. v. Luxembourg, no. 34471/04, § 52, 4 March 2008;Saccoccia v. Austria, no. 69917/01, §§ 60-62, 18 December 2008;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan [GC], no. 40167/06, § 115, ECHR 2015;Sholokhov v. Armenia and the Republic of Moldova, no. 40358/05, § 66, 31 July 2012;Société Guérin Automobiles v. the 15 States of the European Union (dec.), no. 51717/99, 4 July 2000;Ullens de Schooten and Rezabek v. Belgium, nos. 3989/07 and 38353/07, § 62, 20 September 2011;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, §§ 63 and 72, ECHR 1999 I;X v. Latvia [GC], no. 27853/09, §§ 98 and 107, ECHR 2013
|
Preamble, Articles 34(1) and 34(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (Brussels I Regulation);Article 6 (amended) of the Treaty on European Union;Article 52(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;Treaty of Lisbon;Dublin II Regulation;Articles 67(1), 81(1) and 82(1) of the TFEU
|
No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial;Equality of arms)
|
TRUE
|
43
|
1803011_04112015
|
Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary (no. 18030/11)
|
2015-11-04 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"18030/11"
] |
001-115547
|
MAGYAR HELSINKI BIZOTTSÁG v. HUNGARY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115547
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
|
2012-12-04 00:00:00
| 4
|
[
"10",
"10-1"
] |
[
"HUN"
] |
FALSE
|
|||||
44
|
1803011_04112015
|
Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary (no. 18030/11)
|
2015-11-04 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"18030/11"
] |
001-167828
|
CASE OF MAGYAR HELSINKI BIZOTTSÁG v. HUNGARY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-167828
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1108JUD001803011
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2016-11-08 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"8",
"8-1",
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2",
"35",
"35-3",
"41"
] |
[
"HUN"
] |
Section 19 (4) of the Data Act
|
A. Loersch and Nouvelle Association du Courrier v. Switzerland, nos. 23868/94 and 23869/94, Commission decision of 24 February 1995, DR 80, p. 162;Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763/97, § 55, ECHR 2001 XI;Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809/08, § 134, 21 June 2016;Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, § 65, ECHR 2000-II;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876/08, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, § 87, 7 February 2012;Bader v. Austria, no. 26633/95, Commission decision of 15 May 1996;Başkaya and Okçuoğlu v. Turkey [GC], nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94, §§ 61-67, ECHR 1999 IV;Bayatyan v. Armenia [GC], no. 23459/03, § 102 and §§ 108-10, ECHR 2011;Biao v. Denmark [GC], no. 38590/10, § 131, 24 May 2016;Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, ECHR 1999 III;Bosphorus Hava Yolları Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi v. Ireland [GC], no. 45036/98, § 150, ECHR 2005 VI;Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27238/95, § 70, ECHR 2001 I;Chauvy and Others v. France, no. 64915/01, § 68, ECHR 2004 VI;Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, ECHR 2002‑VI;Clavel v. Switzerland, no. 11854/85, Commission decision of 15 October 1987, DR 54, p. 153;Couderc and Hachette Filipacchi Associés v. France [GC], no. 40454/07, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Dammann v. Switzerland, no. 77551/01, § 52, 25 April 2006;De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, 24 February 1997, § 37, Reports 1997 I;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569/09, § 133, ECHR 2015;Eccleston v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 42841/02, 18 May 2004;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 54, ECHR 1999 I;Gaskin v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, Series A no. 160;Gillberg v. Sweden [GC], no. 41723/06, 3 April 2012;Glass v. the United Kingdom, no. 61827/00, § 75, ECHR 2004‑II;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, 27 March 1996, § 39, Reports 1996 II;Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158/98, § 67, ECHR 2004 I;Grupo Interpres SA v. Spain, no. 32849/96, Commission decision of 7 April 1997, DR 89, p. 150;Guerra and Others v. Italy, 19 February 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Guseva v. Bulgaria, no. 6987/07, 17 February 2015;Hassan v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29750/09, §§ 77 and 102, ECHR 2014;Hertel v. Switzerland, 25 August 1998, § 46, Reports 1998‑VI;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, § 239, Series A no. 25;Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 18 December 1986, §§ 51 et seq., Series A no. 112;Jones v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 42639/04, 13 September 2005;Kenedi v. Hungary, no. 31475/05, 26 May 2009;Leander v Sweden, 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116;Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, § 48, ECHR 2007 IV;Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, §§ 38 and 41, Series A no. 103;Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom, 8 July 1986, §§ 114 and 117, Series A no. 102;Loiseau v. France (dec.), no. 46809/99, ECHR 2003-XII (extracts);Lustig-Prean and Beckett v. the United Kingdom, nos. 31417/96 and 32377/96, § 82, 27 September 1999;M.S. v. Sweden, 27 August 1997, § 47, Reports 1997 IV;Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, ECHR 2005 I;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31;Mouvement raëlien suisse v. Switzerland [GC], no. 16354/06, § 48, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 29, Series A no. 251 B;Nurminen and Others v. Finland, no. 27881/95, Commission decision of 26 February 1997;Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom, 26 November 1991, § 59, Series A no. 216;Öneryıldız v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, § 59, ECHR 2004‑XII;Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, § 184, ECHR 2009;Österreichische Vereinigung zur Erhaltung, Stärkung und Schaffung v. Austria, no. 39534/07, 28 November 2013;P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 44787/98, § 57, ECHR 2001 IX;Peck v. the United Kingdom, no. 44647/98, § 62, ECHR 2003 I;Perinçek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510/08, §§ 227-28, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 61, ECHR 2002‑III;Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965/04, § 277, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Rekvényi v. Hungary [GC], no. 25390/94, § 35, ECHR 1999 III;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, § 172, ECHR 2005 X;Roşiianu v. Romania, no. 27329/06, 24 June 2014;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 66, ECHR 2008;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13229/03, § 62, ECHR 2008;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, §§ 104 109, 17 September 2009;Sdruženi Jihočeské Matky v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 19101/03, 10 July 2006;Shapovalov v. Ukraine, no. 45835/05, 31 July 2012;Sigurður A. Sigurjónsson v. Iceland, 30 June 1993, § 35, Series A no. 264;Sinan Işık v. Turkey, no. 21924/05, §§ 42-53, ECHR 2010;Sîrbu and Others v. Moldova, nos. 73562/01, 73565/01, 73712/01, 73744/01, 73972/01 and 73973/01, §§ 17-19, 15 June 2004;Sixteen Austrian Communes and Some of Their Councillors v. Austria, nos. 5767/72 etc., Commission decision of 31 May 1974, Yearbook 1974, p. 338;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 46295/99, §§ 67-68, ECHR 2002-IV;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, §§ 47-48, ECHR 2005 X;Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, ECHR 2005 II;Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-IV;Társaság a Szabadságjogokért v. Hungary (no. 37374/05, § 14, April 2009;Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00, ECHR 2007‑II;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, § 106, ECHR 2012;Weber v. Germany (dec.), no. 70287/11, § 26, 6 January 2015;Witold Litwa v. Poland, no. 26629/95, §§ 57-59, ECHR 2000 III;X. v. Federal Republic of Germany, no. 8383/78, Commission decision of 3 October 1979, Decisions and Reports (DR) 17, p. 227;Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, §§ 51-52, Series A no. 44;Youth Initiative for Human Rights v. Serbia, no. 48135/06, 25 June 2013;Z v. Finland, 25 February 1997, §§ 96-97, Reports 1997 I
|
Articles 31 to 33 of the Vienna Convention of 23 May 1969 on the Law of Treaties;Article 19 of the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;Article 19 of the UN Universal Declaration;Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR);Article 42 of the European Union’s Charter of Fundamental Rights as well as Regulation (EC) No. 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001;Recommendation Rec (2002) 2 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe;Convention on Access to Official Documents of the Council of Europe;Declaration of Principles of Freedom of Expression in Africa, adopted by the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights in 2002;Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data of the Council of Europe of 28 January 1981
|
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione materiae);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom to impart information;Freedom to receive information);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
45
|
1805211_06062018
|
Rooman v. Belgium (no. 18052/11)
|
2018-06-06 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"18052/11"
] |
001-175846
|
CASE OF ROOMAN v. BELGIUM
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-175846
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0718JUD001805211
|
CHAMBER
|
2017-07-18 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"3",
"5",
"5-1",
"5-1-e",
"34",
"41"
] |
[
"BEL"
] |
Aerts v. Belgium, 30 July 1998, § 46, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 V;Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, Series A no 93;Bamouhammad v. Belgium, no 47687/13, §§ 115-123, 17 November 2015;Claes v. Belgium, no 43418/09, 10 January 2013;De Donder and De Clippel v. Belgium, no 8595/06, § 100, 6 December 2011;Dufoort v. Belgium, no 43653/09, §§ 76, 77 and 79, 10 January 2013;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978/05, § 115, ECHR 2010;Gelaude v. Belgium, no 43733/09, §§ 26-30, 9 January 2014;L.B. v. Belgium, no 22831/08, 2 October 2012;Lankester v. Belgium, no 22283/10, 9 January 2014;Moreels v. Belgium, no 43717/09, §§ 29-33, 9 January 2014;Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no 10511/10, ECHR 2016;Oukili v. Belgium, no 43663/09, §§ 29-33, 9 January 2014;Papillo v. Switzerland, no 43368/08, §§ 41-43, 27 January 2015;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 13229/03, § 69, ECHR 2008;Saadouni v. Belgium, no 50658/09, §§ 37-41, 9 January 2014;Scordino v. Italy (no 1) [GC], no 36813/97, §§ 179-180, ECHR 2006 V;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760/06, § 147, ECHR 2012;Swennen v. Belgium, no 53448/10, §§ 69 72, 10 January 2013;Tănase v. Moldova [GC], no 7/08, § 105, ECHR 2010;Torreggiani and Others v. Italy, nos. 43517/09 and 6 others, § 50, 8 January 2013;W.D. v. Belgium, no 73548/13, 6 September 2016;Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, § 51, Series A no 33;Y.Y. v. Turkey, no 14793/08, §§ 52-55, ECHR 2015 (extracts)
|
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
||
46
|
182806_02092015
|
G.I.E.M s.r.l v. Italy (no. 1828/06) , Hotel Promotion Bureau s.r.l. and Rita Sarda s.r.l. v. Italy (no. 34163/07) and Falgest s.r.l. and Gironda v. Italy (no. 19029/11)
|
2015-09-02 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"1828/06"
] |
001-156745
|
G.I.E.M. S.R.L. v. ITALY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-156745
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
| 4
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"7",
"13",
"P1-1"
] |
[
"ITA"
] |
Communicated
| ||||||
47
|
182806_02092015
|
G.I.E.M s.r.l v. Italy (no. 1828/06) , Hotel Promotion Bureau s.r.l. and Rita Sarda s.r.l. v. Italy (no. 34163/07) and Falgest s.r.l. and Gironda v. Italy (no. 19029/11)
|
2015-09-02 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"34163/07"
] |
001-156746
|
HOTEL PROMOTION BUREAU S.R.L. AND OTHERS v. ITALY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-156746
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0605DEC003416307
|
DECISIONS
| 4
|
[
"6",
"7",
"13",
"35",
"P1-1"
] |
[
"ITA"
] |
Partly inadmissible
| |||||
48
|
182806_02092015
|
G.I.E.M s.r.l v. Italy (no. 1828/06) , Hotel Promotion Bureau s.r.l. and Rita Sarda s.r.l. v. Italy (no. 34163/07) and Falgest s.r.l. and Gironda v. Italy (no. 19029/11)
|
2015-09-02 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"19029/11"
] |
001-157226
|
FALGEST S.R.L. AND GIRONDA v. ITALY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-157226
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0430DEC001902911
|
DECISIONS
| 4
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"6-2",
"7",
"13",
"35",
"P1-1",
"P7-2"
] |
[
"ITA"
] |
Partly inadmissible
| |||||
49
|
182806_02092015
|
G.I.E.M s.r.l v. Italy (no. 1828/06) , Hotel Promotion Bureau s.r.l. and Rita Sarda s.r.l. v. Italy (no. 34163/07) and Falgest s.r.l. and Gironda v. Italy (no. 19029/11)
|
2015-09-02 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"1828/06",
"34163/07",
"19029/11"
] |
001-184525
|
CASE OF G.I.E.M. S.R.L. AND OTHERS v. ITALY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-184525
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0628JUD000182806
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2018-06-28 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"6",
"6-2",
"7",
"7-1",
"35",
"35-1",
"35-3-a",
"41",
"P1-1",
"P1-1-1"
] |
[
"ITA"
] |
Law no. 47 of 28 February 1985 ; Sections 18, 19 and 20 of Law no. 47/1985, which became articles 30 and 44 of the Construction Code by Presidential Decree no. 380 of 6 June 2001 ; Article 4 § 4ter of Legislative Decree no. 78/2009 introduced by Law no. 102/2009 ; Articles 579 paragraph 3 and 676 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
|
A. Menarini Diagnostics S.r.l. v. Italy, no 43509/08, §§ 58-59, 27 September 2011;AGOSI v. the United Kingdom, 24 October 1986, § 55, Series A no 108;Allen v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 25424/09, 12 July 2013;Al Nashif v. Bulgaria, no 50963/99, § 123, 20 June 2002;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, § 50, Reports 1996-III;Anheuser-Busch Inv. v. Portugal [GC], no 73049/01, § 83, ECHR 2007 I;Baars v. the Netherlands, no 44320/98, §§ 25-32, 28 October 2003;Berland v. France, no 42875/10, § 42, 3 September 2015;Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi v. Ireland [GC], no 45036/98, § 149, ECHR 2005 VI;Bowler International Unit v. France, no 1946/06, § 67, 23 July 2009;Brosset-Triboulet and Others v. France [GC], no 34078/02, § 87, 29 March 2010;Bulena v. the Czech Republic, no 57567/00, § 37, 20 April 2004;Canády v. Slovakia, no 53371/99, § 31, 16 November 2004;Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no 49429/99, § 134, ECHR 2005 XII (extracts);Del Río Prada v. Spain [GC], no 42750/09, §§ 82-88, ECHR 2013;Depalle v. France [GC], no 34044/02, § 84, ECHR 2010;Didu v. Romania, no 34814/02, §§ 40-42, 14 April 2009;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no 39630/09, § 192, ECHR 2012;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, § 81, Series A no. 22;Ezeh and Connors v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39665/98 and 40086/98, § 123, ECHR 2003-X;Gáll v. Hungary, no 49570/11, § 63, 25 June 2013;Giavi v. Greece, no 25816/09, § 44, 3 October 2013;Giosakis v. Greece (no 3), no 5689/08, § 41, 3 May 2011;Grande Stevens and Others v. Italy, nos. 18640/10 and 4 others, 4 March 2014;Hammerton v. the United Kingdom, no 6287/10, § 84, 17 March 2016;Hentrich v. France, § 49, 22 September 1994, , Series A no 296 A;Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no 31107/96, §§ 55-58, ECHR 1999-II;J.A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd and J.A. Pye (Oxford) Land Ltd v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 44302/02, § 57, ECHR 2007 III;Jahn and Others v. Germany [GC], nos. 46720/99, 72203/01 and 72552/01, §§ 83-95, ECHR 2005-VI;James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, § 37, Series A no 98;Jamil v. France, 8 June 1995, §§ 30-31, Series A no 317 B;Janosevic v. Sweden, no 34619/97, § 68, ECHR 2002 VII;Jokela v. Finland, no 28856/95, § 45, ECHR 2002 IV;Kadubec v. Slovakia, 2 September 1998, § 57, Reports 1998-VI;Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no 21906/04, § 142, ECHR 2008;Klouvi v. France, no 30754/03, § 48, 30 June 2011;M. v. Germany, no 19359/04, ECHR 2009;Maggio and Others v. Italy, nos. 46286/09, 52851/08, 53727/08, 54486/08 and 56001/08, § 57, 31 May 2011;Mamidakis v. Greece, no 35533/04, § 33, 11 January 2007;Paksas v. Lithuania [GC], no 34932/04, § 75, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Paraponiaris v. Greece, no 42132/06, §§ 30-33, 25 September 2008;Salabiaku v. France, 7 October 1988, §§ 27-28, Series A no 141 A;Saliba v. Malta (dec.), no 4251/02, 23 November 2004;Sociedad Anónima del Ucieza v. Spain, no 38963/08, § 74, 4 November 2014;Société Oxygène Plus v. France (dec.), no 76959/11, § 47, 17 May 2016;Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine, no 48553/99, § 96, ECHR 2002 VII;Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, §§ 69-74, Series A no 52;Sud Fondi srl and Others v. Italy, no 75909/01, 20 January 2009;Sud Fondi srl and Others v. Italy (just satisfaction), no 75909/01, 10 May 2012;Sud Fondi srl and Others v. Italy (dec.), no 75909/01, 30 August 2007;Taliadorou and Stylianou v. Cyprus, nos. 39627/05 and 39631/05, §§ 27 and 56 59, 16 October 2008;Valico S.r.l v. Italy (dec.), no 70074/01, ECHR 2006-III;Varvara v. Italy, no. 17475/09, § 51, 29 October 2013;Vuckovic and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153/11 and 29 others, §§ 73-74, 25 March 2014;Welch v. the United Kingdom, 9 February 1995, § 27, Series A no 307-A;Yildirim v. Italy (dec.), no 38602/02, ECHR 2003-IV;Zafranas v. Greece, no 4056/08, § 36, 4 October 2011;Zollmann v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 62902/00, ECHR 2003 XII
|
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Abuse of the right of application;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Nulla poena sine lege;Conviction;Criminal offence);No violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Nulla poena sine lege;Conviction;Criminal offence);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-2 - Presumption of innocence);Just satisfaction reserved (Article 41 - Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
|
50
|
187413_28112018
|
López Ribalda and Others v. Spain (no. 1874/13)
|
2018-11-28 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"1874/13"
] |
001-152959
|
LÓPEZ RIBALDA v. SPAIN and 1 other application
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-152959
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
| 4
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"8",
"8-1"
] |
[
"ESP"
] |
Communicated
| ||||||
51
|
187413_28112018
|
López Ribalda and Others v. Spain (no. 1874/13)
|
2018-11-28 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"1874/13"
] |
001-179881
|
CASE OF LÓPEZ RIBALDA AND OTHERS v. SPAIN
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179881
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0109JUD000187413
|
CHAMBER
|
2018-01-09 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"8",
"8-1",
"35",
"41"
] |
[
"ESP"
] |
Article 20.3 of the Labour Regulations (Estatuto de los Trabadores) approved by Royal Legislative Decree no. 1/1995 ; Section 5 of the Data Protection Act ; Article 3 of Instruction no. 1/2006 issued by the Spanish Data Protection Agency
|
Allan v. the United Kingdom, no. 48539/99, §§ 42 and 43, 5 November 2002;Bărbulescu v. Romania [GC], no. 61496/08, ECHR 2017 (extracts);Benediktsdóttir v. Iceland (dec.), no. 38079/06, 16 June 2009;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, §§ 88-98, 10 March 2009;García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999 I;Halford v. the United Kingdom, 25 June 1997, § 45, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 III;I. v. Finland, no. 20511/03, §§ 35-36, 17 July 2008;J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 48839/09, §§ 77-79, 20 December 2011;K.U. v. Finland, no. 2872/02, §§ 42-43, ECHR 2008;Kemmache v. France (no. 3), 24 November 1994, § 44, Series A no. 296 C;Khan v. the United Kingdom, no. 35394/97, § 34, ECHR 2000 V;P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 44787/98, ECHR 2001 IX;Peck v. the United Kingdom, no. 44647/98, §§ 58-59, ECHR 2003 I;Perry v. the United Kingdom, no. 63737/00, §§ 36-38, ECHR 2003 IX (extracts);Reklos and Davourlis v. Greece, no. 1234/05, § 40, 15 January 2009;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, §§ 43-44, ECHR 2000 V;Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, Series A no. 140, p. 29, §§ 45-48;Schüssel v. Austria (dec.), no. 42409/98, 21 February 2002;Söderman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786/08, §§ 78-79, ECHR 2013;Van Mechelen and Others v. the Netherlands, 23 April 1997, § 50, Reports 1997 III;Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00, § 50, ECHR 2004 VI
|
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
|
52
|
187413_28112018
|
López Ribalda and Others v. Spain (no. 1874/13)
|
2018-11-28 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"1874/13"
] |
001-197098
|
CASE OF LÓPEZ RIBALDA AND OTHERS v. SPAIN
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-197098
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1017JUD000187413
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2019-10-17 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"8",
"8-1",
"35",
"35-1"
] |
[
"ESP"
] |
Section 5 of the Personal Data Protection Act ; Instruction no. 1/2006 of 8 November 2006 ; Article 20.3 of the Labour Regulations (Estatuto de los Trabajadores) approved by Royal Legislative Decree no. 1/1995
|
Allan v. the United Kingdom, no 48539/99, § 35, ECHR 2002 IX;Angelov v. Bulgaria, no 44076/98, § 28, 22 April 2004;Antović and Mirković v. Montenegro, no 70838/13, §§ 42-45, 28 November 2017;Bărbulescu v. Romania [GC], no 61496/08, 5 September 2017;Bochan v. Ukraine (no 2) [GC], no 22251/08, § 61, ECHR 2015;Carmel Saliba v. Malta, no 24221/13, § 67, 29 November 2016;De La Flor Cabrera v. Spain, no 10764/09, § 31, 27 May 2014;Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no 76639/11, §§ 95 and 100, 25 September 2018;Fernández Martínez v. Spain [GC], no 56030/07, § 110, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978/05, § 163, ECHR 2010;Herbecq and the Association "Ligue des droits de l’homme" v. Belgium, nos. 32200/96 and 32201/96, decision of the Commission of 14 January 1998, Decisions and Reports 92-A, p. 92;Ilnseher v. Germany [GC], nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14, § 100, 4 December 2018;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no 25702/94, §§ 140-141, ECHR 2001 VII;Köpke v. Germany (dec.), no 420/07, 5 October 2010;M.C. v. Bulgaria, no 39272/98, § 150, ECHR 2003 XII;Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no 33071/96, ECHR 2000-XII;Navalnyy v. Russia [GC], nos. 29580/12 and 4 others, § 61, 15 November 2018;Nicola v. Turkey, no 18404/91, § 15, 27 January 2009;P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no 44787/98, ECHR 2001 IX;Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955/06 and 3 others, § 62, ECHR 2011;Peck v. the United Kingdom, no 44647/98, §§ 58-63, ECHR 2003 I;Perry v. the United Kingdom, no 63737/00, §§ 36-43, ECHR 2003 IX (extracts);Reklos and Davourlis v. Greece, no 1234/05, §§ 34-43, 15 January 2009;Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, §§ 46-48, Series A no 140;Schüssel v. Austria (dec.), no 42409/98, 21 February 2002;Schüth v. Germany, no 1620/03, §§ 54 and 57, ECHR 2010;Söderman v. Sweden [GC], no 5786/08, § 78, ECHR 2013;Von Hannover v. Germany (no 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, §§ 95 and 98, ECHR 2012;Vukota-Bojić v. Switzerland, no 61838/10, §§ 55-59, 18 October 2016;X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, §§ 23, 24 and 27, Series A no 91
|
Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data
|
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)
|
TRUE
|
53
|
1901007_03102012
|
X. and Others v. Austria (no. 19010/07)
|
2012-10-03 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"19010/07"
] |
001-112158
|
X AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-112158
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
|
2009-01-29 00:00:00
| 4
|
[
"8",
"8-1",
"14"
] |
[
"AUT"
] |
Communicated
|
FALSE
|
||||
54
|
1901007_03102012
|
X. and Others v. Austria (no. 19010/07)
|
2012-10-03 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"19010/07"
] |
001-116735
|
CASE OF X AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-116735
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0219JUD001901007
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2013-02-19 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"8",
"8-1",
"14",
"14+8",
"41"
] |
[
"AUT"
] |
Articles 179 § 2, 180a , 181 § 1, sub-paragraph 2, 181 § 3 and 182 § 2 of the Civil Code ; Article 8 § 4 of the Registered Partnership Act
|
A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579/05, § 232, ECHR 2010;Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498/08, § 128, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378/05, § 60, ECHR 2008;Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 78, ECHR 2002-VI;Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45;E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546/02, 22 January 2008;Emonet and Others v. Switzerland, no. 39051/03, 13 December 2007;Eski v. Austria, no. 21949/03, 25 January 2007;Fretté v. France, no. 36515/97, ECHR 2002-I;Gas and Dubois v. France, no. 25951/07, 15 March 2012;Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) [GC], no. 74025/01, § 72, ECHR 2005-IX;Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, ECHR 2003-IX;Kozak v. Poland, no. 13102/02, 2 March 2010;L. and V. v. Austria, nos. 39392/98 and 39829/98, ECHR 2003-I;Modinos v. Cyprus, 22 April 1993, Series A no. 259;Norris v. Ireland, 26 October 1988, Series A no. 142;P.B. and J.S. v. Austria, no. 18984/02, 22 July 2010;Petrovic v. Austria, 27 March 1998, § 22, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II;S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 57813/00, § 94, ECHR 2011;Salgueiro da Silva Mouta v. Portugal, no. 33290/96, ECHR 1999-IX;Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no. 30141/04, ECHR 2010;Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 33985/96 and 33986/96, ECHR 1999-VI;Sporer v. Austria, no. 35637/03, §§ 88-90, 3 February 2011;Wagner and J.M.W.L. v. Luxembourg, no. 76240/01, § 119, 28 June 2007;Zaunegger v. Germany, no. 22028/04, §§ 61-63, 3 December 2009
|
Article 7 §§ 1 and 2 of the 2008 European Convention on the Adoption of Children;Recommendation CM/Rec(2010)5 adopted on 31 March 2010 by the Committee of Ministers
|
No violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Non-pecuniary damage - award
|
TRUE
|
55
|
1986712_01062016
|
Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (No. 2) (no. 19867/12)
|
2016-06-01 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"19867/12"
] |
001-175646
|
CASE OF MOREIRA FERREIRA v. PORTUGAL (No. 2)
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-175646
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0711JUD001986712
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2017-07-11 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"35",
"35-3-a",
"46",
"46-1",
"46-2"
] |
[
"PRT"
] |
Articles 449 (1) (g) and 457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
|
Anđelković v. Serbia, no. 1401/08, § 24, 9 April 2013;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, §§ 202 and 203, ECHR 2004 II;Bochan v. Ukraine (no 2) [GC], no 22251/08, ECHR 2015;Bota v. Romania, no. 16382/03, §§ 33 and 34, 4 November 2008;Bujniţa v. Moldova, no. 36492/02, § 20, 16 January 2007;Davydov v. Russia, no. 18967/07, § 29, 30 October 2014;Del Río Prada v. Spain [GC], no. 42750/09, §§ 138 and 139, ECHR 2013;Dulaurans v. France, no. 34553/97, §§ 33-34 and 38, 21 March 2000;Egmez v. Cyprus, (dec.), no. 12214/07, 18 September 2012;Emre v. Switzerland (no. 2), no. 5056/10, 11 October 2011;Fischer v. Austria (dec.), no. 27569/02, ECHR 2003-VI;García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 26, ECHR 1999 I;Giuran v. Romania, no. 24360/04, § 39, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Henryk Urban and Ryszard Urban v. Poland, no. 23614/08, § 66, 30 November 2010;Higgins and Others v. France, 19 February 1998, §§ 42-43, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Jeronovičs v. Latvia [GC], no. 44898/10, § 118, ECHR 2016;Khamidov v. Russia, no. 72118/01, § 170, 15 November 2007;Lenskaya v. Russia, no. 28730/03, §§ 39 and 40, 29 January 2009;Lhermitte v. Belgium [GC], no. 34238/09, §§ 66 and 67, ECHR 2016;Lyons and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 15227/03, ECHR 2003-IX;Maresti v. Croatia, no. 55759/07, §§ 25 and 28, 25 June 2009;Meftah and Others v. France [GC], nos. 32911/96, 35237/97 and 34595/97, § 40, ECHR 2002 VII;Monnell and Morris v. the United Kingdom, 2 March 1987, § 54, Series A no. 115;Nikitin v. Russia, no. 50178/99, §§ 55-57, ECHR 2004 VIII;Öcalan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 5980/07, 6 July 2010;Öcalan v. Turkey, [GC], no. 46221/99, § 210, ECHR 2005 IV;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358/12, § 210, ECHR 2017;Pavlović and Others v. Croatia, no. 13274/11, § 49, 2 April 2015;Radchikov v. Russia, no. 65582/01, § 48, 24 May 2007;Ruiz Torija v. Spain, 9 December 1994, §§ 29-30, Series A no. 303 A;Savinskiy v. Ukraine, no. 6965/02, § 25, 28 February 2006;Sejdovic v. Italy, [GC], no. 56581/00, ECHR 2006 II;Ştefan v. Romania, no. 28319/03, § 18, 6 April 2010;Tsanova-Gecheva v. Bulgaria, no. 43800/12, § 91, 15 September 2015;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no 2) ([GC], no 32772/02, ECHR 2009;Yaremenko v. Ukraine (no. 2), no. 66338/09, 30 April 2015
|
Recommendation No. (2000) 2 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on re-examination or reopening of certain cases at domestic level following judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
|
Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-3-a - Ratione materiae);Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Ratione materiae);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Criminal charge;Fair hearing)
|
TRUE
|
56
|
20117_21112018
|
Magyar Kétfarkú Kutya Párt v. Hungary (no. 201/17)
|
2018-11-21 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"201/17"
] |
001-170894
|
MAGYAR KÉTFARKÚ KUTYA PÁRT v. HUNGARY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170894
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
| 4
|
[
"10",
"10-1"
] |
[
"HUN"
] |
Communicated
| ||||||
57
|
20117_21112018
|
Magyar Kétfarkú Kutya Párt v. Hungary (no. 201/17)
|
2018-11-21 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"201/17"
] |
001-180310
|
CASE OF MAGYAR KÉTFARKÚ KUTYA PÁRT v. HUNGARY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-180310
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0123JUD000020117
|
CHAMBER
|
2018-01-23 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2",
"35",
"35-1",
"41"
] |
[
"HUN"
] |
Article IX (1) of the Fundamental Law ; Section 2(1), (a) and (e) of Act XXXVI of 2013 on Electoral Procedure
|
Chiragov and Others v. Armenia [GC], no. 13216/05, § 116, ECHR 2015;Džinić v. Croatia, no. 38359/13, § 49, 17 May 2016;Erményi v. Hungary, no. 22254/14, § 38, 22 November 2016;Guseva v. Bulgaria, no. 6987/07, § 36, 17 February 2015;Neij and Sunde Kolmisoppi v. Sweden (dec.), no. 40397/12, 20 June 2012;Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom, 26 November 1991, § 59(b), Series A no. 216;Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, § 49, ECHR 1999-VI;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358/12, § 169, ECHR 2017;S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, §§ 113-114, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria, nos. 29221/95 and 29225/95, § 84, ECHR 2001 IX;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, § 103, ECHR 2012
|
Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression;Freedom to impart information;Freedom to receive information);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
FALSE
|
|
58
|
20117_21112018
|
Magyar Kétfarkú Kutya Párt v. Hungary (no. 201/17)
|
2018-11-21 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"201/17"
] |
001-200657
|
CASE OF MAGYAR KÉTFARKÚ KUTYA PÁRT v. HUNGARY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-200657
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0120JUD000020117
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2020-01-20 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2",
"41"
] |
[
"HUN"
] |
Section 2(1), 2(1)a, 2(1)(e), 141, 218 and 218(2)(d) of the Act XXXVI of 2013 on Electoral Procedure (EPA) ; Article 2(1) of the Fundamental Law
|
Ahmet Yıldırım v. Turkey, no. 3111/10, §§ 49-50, ECHR 2012;Association Ekin v. France, no. 39288/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-VIII;Bédat v. Switzerland [GC], no. 56925/08, § 58, 29 March 2016;Cengiz and Others v. Turkey, nos. 48226/10 and 14027/11, § 54, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433/09, § 141, ECHR 2012;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569/09, §§ 120-122, ECHR 2015;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 144, ECHR 2010;Gillow v. the United Kingdom, 24 November 1986, § 51, Series A no. 109;Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158/98, § 65, ECHR 2004 I;Ivinović v. Croatia, no. 13006/13, § 28, 18 September 2014;Jalloh v. Germany (dec.), no. 54810/00, 26 October 2004;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, § 31, Series A no. 298;Kovach v. Ukraine, no. 39424/02, §§ 48-62, ECHR 2008;Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, § 115, ECHR 2015;Lykourezos v. Greece, no. 33554/03, §§ 50-58, ECHR 2006 VIII;Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030/11, 8 November 2016;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, § 67, Series A no. 82;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 107, 10 September 2010;Neij and Sunde Kolmisoppi v. Sweden (dec.), no. 40397/12, 19 February 2013;O’Keeffe v. Ireland [GC], no. 35810/09, § 199, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Olsson v. Sweden (no. 1), 24 March 1988, § 61, Series A no. 130;Orlovskaya Iskra v. Russia, no. 42911/08, § 110, 21 February 2017;Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, § 49, ECHR 1999 VI;Parrillo v. Italy [GC], no. 46470/11, § 87, ECHR 2015;Paschalidis, Koutmeridis and Zaharakis v. Greece, nos. 27863/05 and 2 others, §§ 29-35, 10 April 2008;Perinçek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510/08, § 136, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Refah Partisi (the Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 41340/98 and 3 others, §§ 87-88 and 100, ECHR 2003 II;Schwarzenberger v. Germany, no. 75737/01, § 31, 10 August 2006;Storck v. Germany (dec.), no. 61603/00, 26 October 2004;Társaság a Szabadságjogokért v. Hungary, no. 37374/05, 14 April 2009;Uhl v. Germany (dec.), no. 64387/01, 6 May 2004;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, § 103, ECHR 2012;Vučković and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153/11 and 29 others, §§ 69-77, 25 March 2014
|
Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression;Freedom to impart information;Freedom to receive ideas);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
|
59
|
2026112_17062015
|
Baka v. Hungary (no. 20261/12)
|
2015-06-17 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"20261/12"
] |
001-115532
|
BAKA v. HUNGARY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115532
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
|
2012-11-29 00:00:00
| 4
|
[
"10"
] |
[
"HUN"
] |
FALSE
|
|||||
60
|
2026112_17062015
|
Baka v. Hungary (no. 20261/12)
|
2015-06-17 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"20261/12"
] |
001-144139
|
CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-144139
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527JUD002026112
|
CHAMBER
|
2014-05-27 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2",
"35",
"35-3",
"41"
] |
[
"HUN"
] |
Section 74/A(2) of the Organisation and Administration of the Courts Act (Act LXVI of 1997) ; Section 11(2) of the Transitional Provisions of the Fundamental Law of Hungary ; Organisation and Administration of the Courts Bill (no. T/4743)
|
Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal [GC], no. 73049/01, § 64, ECHR 2007 I;Apay v. Turkey (dec.), no. 3964/05, 11 December 2007;Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 May 1985, § 57, Series A no. 93;Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131;Dzhidzheva-Trendafilova v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 12628/09, §§ 42-50, 9 October 2012;Efendiyeva v. Azerbaijan, no. 31556/03, § 59, 25 October 2007;Erkan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 29840/03, 24 March 2005;G. v. Finland, no. 33173/05, § 34, 27 January 2009;Golder v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1975, § 36, Series A no. 18;Hans-Adam von Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, § 91, ECHR 2001-VIII;Harabin v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 62584/00, 9 July 2002;Harabin v. Slovakia, no. 58688/11, 20 November 2012;Juricic v. Croatia, no. 58222/09, §§ 53-57, 26 July 2011;Kayasu v. Turkey, nos. 64119/00 and 76292/01, §§ 77-79, 13 November 2008;Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 39343/98, 39651/98, 43147/98 and 46664/99, § 193, ECHR 2003-VI;Kudeshkina v. Russia, no. 29492/05, § 79, 26 February 2009;Lombardi Vallauri v. Italy, no. 39128/05, §§ 45-56, 20 October 2009;Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398/03, § 99, ECHR 2006 XIV;N.K.M. v. Hungary, no. 66529/11, 14 May 2013;Nazsiz v. Turkey (dec.), no. 22412/05, 26 May 2009;Nedelcho Popov v. Bulgaria, no. 61360/00, § 32, 22 November 2007;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no. 21722/11, §§ 87-91, 9 January 2013;Olujic v. Croatia, no. 22330/05, 5 February 2009;Pellegrin v. France [GC], no. 28541/95, § 66, ECHR 1999 VIII;Petrova and Chornobryvets v. Ukraine, nos. 6360/04 and 16820/04, § 15, 15 May 2008;Pitkevich v. Russia (dec.), no. 47936/99, 8 February 2001;Poyraz v. Turkey, no. 15966/06, §§ 55-57, 7 December 2010;Sacilor-Lormines v. France, no. 65411/01, ECHR 2006 XIII;Saygılı and Seyman v. Turkey, no. 51041/99, §§ 24-25, 27 June 2006;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 46295/99, § 78, ECHR 2002-IV;Tosti v. Italy (dec.), no. 27791/06, 12 May 2009;Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00, ECHR 2007-II;Volkov v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 21722/11, 18 October 2011;Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396/95, §§ 42-43, ECHR 1999 VII
|
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione materiae);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Just satisfaction reserved
|
TRUE
|
|
61
|
2026112_17062015
|
Baka v. Hungary (no. 20261/12)
|
2015-06-17 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"20261/12"
] |
001-163113
|
CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163113
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0623JUD002026112
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2016-06-23 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2",
"41"
] |
[
"HUN"
] |
Articles 47 (2), 48 (1) and (3) and 50 (3) of the 1949 Constitution ; Fundamental Law of Hungary of 25 April 2011 ; Section 11 (2) of the Transitional Provisions of the Fundamental Law of Hungary (2011, entered into force on 1 January 2012) ; Sections 62, 69, 73 and 74/A (1) of the Organisation and Administration of the Courts Act (Act LXVI of 1997) ; Section 185 of the Organisation and Administration of the Courts Act (Act CLXI of 2011, entered into force on 1 January 2012) ; Section 45 (1) of Parliamentary decision 46/1994. (IX.30.) OGY on the Rules of Parliament
|
Aktaş v. Turkey, no. 24351/94, § 79, ECHR 2003 V (extracts);Albayrak v. Turkey, no. 38406/97, §§ 40-42, 31 January 2008;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876/08 § 108, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Association Ekin v. France, no. 39288/98, § 61, ECHR 2001 VIII;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, § 90, 7 February 2012;Bayer v. Germany, no. 8453/04, § 38, 16 July 2009;Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251/08, § 42, ECHR 2015;Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no. 37575/04, §§ 90-91, ECHR 2012;Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131;Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, §§ 47-48, Series A no. 236;Colombani and Others v. France, no. 51279/99, § 66, ECHR 2002 V;Creangă v. Romania [GC], no. 29226/03, §§ 88-90, 23 February 2012;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, §§ 177-179, ECHR 2007 IV;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569/09, § 131, ECHR 2015;Di Giovanni v. Italy, no. 51160/06, 9 July 2013;Dzhidzheva-Trendafilova v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 12628/09, 9 October 2012;Efendiyeva v. Azerbaijan, no. 31556/03, § 59, 25 October 2007;El Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630/09, §§ 151-152, ECHR 2012;Fadeyeva v. Russia, no. 55723/00, § 79, ECHR 2005 IV;Fruni v. Slovakia, no. 8014/07, § 145, 21 June 2011;G. v. Finland, no. 33173/05, 27 January 2009;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 36, Series A no. 18;Guja v. Moldova [GC], no. 14277/04, § 52, ECHR 2008;Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24;Harabin v. Slovakia, no. 58688/11, 20 November 2012;Henryk Urban and Ryszard Urban v. Poland, no. 23614/08, § 53, 30 November 2010;Ivanova v. Bulgaria, no. 52435/99, §§ 83-84, 12 April 2007;Juričić v. Croatia, no. 58222/09, 26 July 2011;Karaduman and Tandoğan v. Turkey, nos. 41296/04 and 41298/04, § 9, 3 June 2008;Kayasu v. Turkey, nos. 64119/00 and 76292/01, 13 November 2008;Kudeshkina v. Russia, no. 29492/05, §§ 79-100, 26 February 2009;Kuznetsov and Others v. Russia, no. 184/02, § 87, 11 January 2007;Kyprianou v. Cyprus [GC], no. 73797/01, §§ 171 and 181, ECHR 2005 XIII;Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, § 46, ECHR 2007-IV;Lombardi Vallauri v. Italy, no. 39128/05, §§ 45-56, 20 October 2009;Makhmudov v. Russia, no. 35082/04, §§ 68-73, 26 July 2007;Mamère v. France, no. 12697/03, §§ 23-24, ECHR 2006 XIII;Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398/03, § 99, ECHR 2006 XIV;Morice v. France [GC], no. 29369/10, 23 April 2015;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 147, ECHR 2005-VII;Nedelcho Popov v. Bulgaria, no. 61360/00, 22 November 2007;Ohneberg v. Austria, no. 10781/08, § 25, 18 September 2012;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no. 21722/11, ECHR 2013;Olujić v. Croatia, no. 22330/05, 5 February 2009;Özpınar v. Turkey, no. 20999/04, § 30, 19 October 2010;Pellegrin v. France [GC], no. 28541/95, ECHR 1999 VIII;Perinçek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510/08, § 196, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Pitkevich v. Russia (dec.), no. 47936/99, 8 February 2001;Poyraz v. Turkey, no. 15966/06, §§ 55-57, 7 December 2010;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, § 119, ECHR 2005 X;Roland Dumas v. France, no. 34875/07, § 43, 15 July 2010;Savino and Others v. Italy, nos. 17214/05, 20329/05 and 42113/04, §§ 68-69, 28 April 2009;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 230, ECHR 2012;Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, § 95, ECHR 2005-II;Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, 9 December 1994, §§ 47-50, Series A no. 301 B;Sükut v. Turkey (dec.), no. 59773/00, 11 September 2007;Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-IV;Tsanova Gecheva v. Bulgaria, no. 43800/12, 15 September 2015;Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00, ECHR 2007 II;Vistiņš and Perepjolkins v. Latvia [GC], no. 71243/01, § 99, 25 October 2012;Vogt v. Germany, 26 September 1995, § 53, Series A no. 323;Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396/95, ECHR 1999 VII;Zander v. Sweden, 25 November 1993, § 24, Series A no. 279 B
|
Point 20 of the Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary adopted by the Seventh United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders (Milan, 1985) and endorsed by UN General Assembly Resolutions 40/32 of 29 November 1985 and 40/146 of 13 December 1985;Paragraphs 1.3, 5.1 and 7.2 of the European Charter on the Statute for Judges (Strasbourg, 8-10 July 1998) (meeting organised under the auspices of the Council of Europe), endorsed by the Presidents of the Supreme Courts of Central and Eastern European countries (Kyiv, 12-4 October 1998), and again by judges and representatives from Ministries of Justice from 25 European countries (Lisbon, 8-10 April 1999);Paragraphs 59-60 of Opinion no. 1 (2001) of the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE) on standards concerning the independence of the judiciary and the irremovability of judges (23 November 2001);Opinion no. 3 (2002) of the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE) on the principles and rules governing judges’ professional conduct, in particular ethics, incompatible behaviour and impartiality (19 November 2002);General Comment no. 32 on Article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Right to equality before courts and tribunals and to a fair trial) of the United Nations Human Rights Committee (23 August 2007);Paragraphs 3, 6 and 9 of the Magna Carta of Judges (Fundamental Principles) adopted by the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE) (November 2010);Opinion on the Legal Status and Remuneration of Judges Act (Act CLXII of 2011) and the Organisation and Administration of the Courts Act (Act CLXI of 2011), adopted by the Venice Commission at its 90th Plenary Session (Venice, 16-17 March 2012, CDL-AD(2012)001);Report on the “Request for the opening of a monitoring procedure in respect of Hungary” adopted by the Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by the Member States (Monitoring Committee) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (10 June 2013)
|
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Civil rights and obligations;Determination (civil));Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
62
|
2045214_06122017
|
Molla Sali v. Greece (no. 20452/14)
|
2017-12-06 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"20452/14"
] |
001-188985
|
CASE OF MOLLA SALI v. GREECE
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-188985
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1219JUD002045214
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2018-12-19 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"14",
"14+P1-1",
"34",
"35",
"35-1",
"41",
"P1-1",
"P1-1-1"
] |
[
"GRC"
] |
Article 1724 of the Civil Code ; Article 11 of the 1913 Treaty of Athens ; Section 4 of Law no. 147/1914 ; Section 10 of Law no. 2345/1920 ; Section 5(2) of Law no. 1920/1991
|
Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 68, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, § 56, ECHR 2000 III;Beian v. Romania (no. 1), no. 30658/05, § 39, ECHR 2007-V (extracts);Beyeler v. Italy [GC], no. 33202/96, § 105, ECHR 2000 I;Biao v. Denmark [GC], no. 38590/10, § 88, 24 May 2016;Brosset-Triboulet v. France [GC] no. 34078/02, 29 March 2010;Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184/05, ECHR 2010;Clift v. the United Kingdom, no. 7205/07, §§ 56-59, 13 July 2010;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, § 177, ECHR 2007 IV;E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546/02, §§ 47-48, 22 January 2008;Efe v. Austria, no. 9134/06, § 48, 8 January 2013;Fábián v. Hungary [GC], no. 78117/13, §§ 112-113, 5 September 2017;Fabris v. France [GC], no. 16574/08, §§ 51-56, ECHR 2013;Gherghina v. Romania [GC] (dec.), no. 42219/07, § 85, 9 July 2015;Guberina v. Croatia, no. 23682/13, § 78, ECHR 2016;İzzettin Doğan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, 26 April 2016;Karoussiotis v. Portugal, no. 23205/08, § 57, 1 February 2011;Khamtokhu and Aksenchik v. Russia [GC], nos. 60367/08 and 961/11, §§ 64-65, 24 January 2017;Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no. 30078/06, ECHR 2012;Korbely v. Hungary [GC], no. 9174/02, § 72, ECHR 2008;Leyla Şahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774/98, §§ 108-10, ECHR 2005 XI;Lombardi Vallauri v. Italy, no. 39128/02, 20 October 2009;Mazurek v. France, no. 34406/97, § 42, ECHR 2000-II;Merger and Cros v. France, no. 68864/01, § 32, 22 November 2004;Negrepontis-Giannisis v. Greece, no. 56759/08, 3 May 2011;Parrillo v. Italy [GC], no. 46470/11, § 211, CEDH 2015;Pellegrini v. Italy, no. 30882/96, ECHR 2001-VIII;Pla and Puncernau v. Andorra, ECHR 2004-VIII, § 46;Prencipe v. Monaco, no. 43376/06, § 93, 16 July 2009;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/10, 20 March 2018;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 46, ECHR 2006-II;Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 76, ECHR 1999 V;Serif v. Greece, no. 38178/97, § 40, ECHR 1999-IX;Şerife Yiğit v. Turkey [GC], no. 3976/05, § 52, 2 November 2010;Škorjanec v. Croatia, no. 25536/14, § 55, 28 March 2017;Söderman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786/08, § 107, ECHR 2013;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, § 55, ECHR 2005-X;Stummer v. Austria [GC], no. 37452/02, § 88, ECHR 2011;Thlimmenos v. Greece [GC], no. 34369/97, ECHR 2000 IV;Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381/09 and 32684/09, § 85, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Vučković and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], no. 17153/11 and 29 others, § 74, 25 March 2014;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, § 54, ECHR 1999-I;Weller v. Hungary, no. 44399/05, § 37, 31 March 2009;X and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 19010/07, § 98, ECHR 2013
|
Treaty of Lausanne;Treaty of Sèvres;Article 3 § 1 of the Council of Europe Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities
|
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 14+P1-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property;Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Possessions);Just satisfaction reserved (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
63
|
2045214_06122017
|
Molla Sali v. Greece (no. 20452/14)
|
2017-12-06 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"20452/14"
] |
001-203370
|
CASE OF MOLLA SALI v. GREECE
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-203370
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0618JUD002045214
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2020-06-18 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"41"
] |
[
"GRC"
] |
Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain (Article 50), 13 July 1994, § 17, Series A no. 285-C;Brumărescu v. Romania (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 28342/95, § 20, ECHR 2001 I;Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 13216/05, § 59, ECHR 2017;Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 29, ECHR 2000 IV;Cyprus v. Turkey (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 25781/94, § 56, ECHR 2014;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium (Article 50), 10 March 1972, § 16, Series A no. 14;Former King of Greece and Others v. Greece [GC] (just satisfaction), no. 25701/94, § 79, 28 November 2002;Guiso-Gallisay v. Italy (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 58858/00, § 90, 22 December 2009;Kurić and Others v. Slovenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 26828/06, § 79, ECHR 2014;Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece (Article 50), 31 October 1995, § 38, Series A no. 330-B;S.C. Granitul S.A. v. Romania (just satisfaction), no. 22022/03, § 15, 24 April 2012;Kryvenkyy v. Ukraine, no. 43768/07, § 52, 16 February 2017;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 40167/06, § 39, 12 December 2017;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064/90 and 8 others, § 224, ECHR 2009;Vistiņš and Perepjolkins v. Latvia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 71243/01, ECHR 2014
|
Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
||
64
|
2172211_12062012
|
Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine (no. 21722/11)
|
2012-06-12 00:00:00
|
Chamber hearing
|
[
"21722/11"
] |
001-107361
|
VOLKOV v. UKRAINE
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-107361
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1018DEC002172211
|
DECISIONS
| 4
|
[
"6",
"8",
"13"
] |
[
"UKR"
] |
Partly inadmissible
|
Dataset Summary
This dataset contains transcribed court hearings sourced from official hearings of the European Court of Human Rights (https://www.echr.coe.int/webcasts-of-hearings). The hearings are 154 selected webcasts (videos) from 2012-2022 in their original language (no interpretation). With manual annotation for language labels and automatic processing of the extracted audio with pyannote and whisper-large-v2, the resulting dataset contains 4000 speaker turns and 88920 individual lines. The dataset contains two subsets, the transcripts and the metadata with linked documents. The transcripts are additionally available as .txt or .xml.
Languages
The largest amounts in the transcripts are:
English, French
A smaller portion also contains the following languages:
Russian, Spanish, Croatian, Italian, Portuguese, Turkish, Polish, Lithuanian, German, Ukrainian, Hungarian, Dutch, Albanian, Romanian, Serbian
The collected metadata is:
English
Dataset Structure
Data Instances
Each instance in transcripts represents an entire segment of a transcript, similar to a conversation turn in a dialog.
{
'id': 0,
'webcast_id': '4927011_26052021',
'segment_id': 0,
'speaker_role': 'Announcer',
'speaker_name': 'UNK',
'sequence_id': 0,
'begin': '10.74',
'end': '11.42',
'language': 'fr',
'text': 'La Cour!'
}
Each instance in documents represents a information on a document in hudoc associated with a hearing and the metadata associated with a hearing. The actual document is linked and can also be found in hudoc with the case_id. Note: hearing_type states the type of the hearing, type states the type of the document. If the hearing is a "Grand Chamber hearing", the "CHAMBER" document refers to a different hearing.
{
'id': 16,
'webcast_id': '1232311_02102012',
'hearing_title': 'Michaud v. France (nos. 12323/11)',
'hearing_date': '2012-10-02 00:00:00',
'hearing_type': 'Chamber hearing',
'application_number': ['12323/11'],
'case_id': '001-115377',
'case_name': 'CASE OF MICHAUD v. FRANCE',
'case_url': 'https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115377',
'ecli': 'ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1206JUD001232311',
'type': 'CHAMBER',
'document_date': '2012-12-06 00:00:00',
'importance': 1,
'articles': ['8', '8-1', '8-2', '34', '35'],
'respondent_government': ['FRA'],
'issue': 'Decision of the National Bar Council of 12 July 2007 “adopting regulations on internal procedures for implementing the obligation to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, and an internal supervisory mechanism to guarantee compliance with those procedures” ; Article 21-1 of the Law of 31 December 1971 ; Law no. 2004-130 of 11 February 2004 ; Monetary and Financial Code',
'strasbourg_caselaw': 'André and Other v. France, no 18603/03, 24 July 2008;Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi v. Ireland [GC], no 45036/98, ECHR 2005-VI;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 13378/05, §§ 33-34, ECHR 2008;Campbell v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1992, §§ 44 and 46-48, Series A no 233;Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1981, § 41, Series A no 28;Ekinci and Akalin v. Turkey, no 77097/01, § 47, 30 January 2007;Frérot v. France, no 70204/01, §§ 53-54, 12 June 2007;Grifhorst v. France, no 28336/02, § 93, 26 February 2009;Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 18 December 1986, § 42, Series A no 112;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 52, Series A no 260-A;Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no 30696/09, ECHR 2011;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, § 27, Series A no 31;Mor v. France, no 28198/09, 15 December 2011;Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, Series A no 251-B;Norris v. Ireland, 26 October 1988, §§ 30-34 and 38, Series A no 142;Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, no 51772/99, ECHR 2003-IV;Sallinen and Others v. Finland, no 50882/99, 27 September 2005;Schönenberger and Durmaz v. Switzerland, 20 June 1988, Series A no 137;Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1983, §§ 56-88, Series A no 61;Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no 74336/01, §§ 65-66, ECHR 2007-IV;Xavier Da Silveira v. France, no 43757/05, § 36-37 and 43, 21 January 2010',
'external_sources': 'Directive 91/308/EEC, 10 June 1991;Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union;Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;Articles 169, 170, 173, 175, 177, 184 and 189 of the Treaty establishing the European Community;Recommendations 12 and 16 of the financial action task force (“FATF”) on money laundering;Council of Europe Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime and on the Financing of Terrorism (16 May 2005)',
'conclusion': 'Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life)',
'separate_opinion': 'FALSE'
}
Data Fields
transcripts:
- id: the identifier
- webcast_id: the identifier for the hearing
- segment_id: the identifier of the current speaker segment in the current hearing
- speaker_name: the name of the speaker (not given for Applicant, Government or Third Party)
- speaker_role: the role/party the speaker represents (
Announcerfor announcements,Judgefor judges,JudgePfor judge president,Applicantfor representatives of the applicant,Governmentfor representatives of the respondent government,ThirdPartyfor representatives of third party interveners) - sequence_id: id to keep the order of speech texts within a segment
- begin: the timestamp for begin of line (in seconds)
- end: the timestamp for end of line (in seconds)
- language: the language spoken (in ISO 639-1)
- text: the spoken line
documents:
- id: the identifier
- webcast_id: the identifier for the hearing (allows linking to transcripts)
- hearing_title: the title of the hearing
- hearing_date: the date of the hearing
- hearing_type: the type of hearing (Grand Chamber, Chamber or Grand Chamber Judgment Hearing)
- application_number: the application numbers which are associated with the hearing and case
- case_id: the id of the case
- case_name: the name of the case
- case_url: the direct link to the document
- ecli: the ECLI (European Case Law Identifier)
- type: the type of the document
- document_date: the date of the document
- importance: the importance score of the case (1 is the highest importance, key case)
- articles: the concerning articles of the Convention of Human Rights
- respondent_government: the code of the respondent government(s) (in ISO-3166 Alpha-3)
- issue: the references to the issue of the case
- strasbourg_caselaw: the list of cases in the ECHR which are relevant to the current case
- external_sources: the relevant references outside of the ECHR
- conclusion: the short textual description of the conclusion
- separate_opinion: the indicator if there is a separate opinion
Data Splits
The dataset is only split into a train set.
Dataset Creation
Curation Rationale
This datasets provides partly corrected transcribed webcasts to enable the processing of hearings in legal NLP. No specific task is given.
Source Data
Data Collection
The data was collected by transcribing the publicly available webcasts of the ECHR with the help of pyannote and whisper-large-v2. The documents were sourced from the ECHR hudoc database.
Who are the source producers?
Participants in hearings before the ECHR for the audio and video material. Employees and judges of the ECHR for the documents.
Annotations
Annotation process
language identification Spoken languages were manually identified by research assistants. Disagreements were discussed to achieve the final language label.
transcript correction All parts spoken by Judge or Judge President are corrected for the languages English and French by research assistants with a high proficiency in the respective language.
Personal and Sensitive Information
The dataset contains names of judges and other participants in the hearings. Due to those names being available in the public court material, we did not remove them. The machine-generated transcripts may also contain names, which were neither checked nor removed. In case of sensitive information, we rely on the provided material to provide protection (occasionally bleeping out names which should not have been mentioned in webcasts, appropriate anonymization in the documents).
Additional Information
Download the transcripts and linked documents:
from datasets import load_dataset
lacour_transcripts = load_dataset("TrustHLT/LaCour", "transcripts") # default config
lacour_documents = load_dataset("TrustHLT/LaCour", "documents")
Formatted versions of the transcripts in .txt and .xml and more information on the collection and creation can be found on github.
Citation Information
Please cite this data using:
@article{Held2024LaCour,
title = {LaCour!: enabling research on argumentation in hearings of the European Court of Human Rights},
author = {Held, Lena and Habernal, Ivan},
year = 2024,
month = nov,
journal = {Artificial Intelligence and Law},
publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media LLC},
doi = {10.1007/s10506-024-09428-4},
issn = {1572-8382},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10506-024-09428-4}
}
- Downloads last month
- 159