id
int64 | webcast_id
string | hearing_title
string | hearing_date
string | hearing_type
string | application_number
list | case_id
string | case_name
string | case_url
string | ecli
string | type
string | document_date
string | importance
int64 | articles
list | respondent_government
list | issue
string | strasbourg_caselaw
string | external_sources
string | conclusion
string | separate_opinion
string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0
|
1021112_29112017
|
Ilnseher v. Germany (nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14)
|
2017-11-29 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"10211/12"
] |
001-139684
|
ILNSEHER v. GERMANY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-139684
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
| 4
|
[
"5",
"5-1",
"5-1-a",
"6",
"6-1",
"7",
"7-1"
] |
[
"DEU"
] | |||||||
1
|
1021112_29112017
|
Ilnseher v. Germany (nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14)
|
2017-11-29 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"27505/14"
] |
001-150507
|
ILNSEHER v. GERMANY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-150507
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
| 4
|
[
"5",
"5-1-e",
"6",
"6-1",
"7",
"7-1"
] |
[
"DEU"
] |
Communicated
| ||||||
2
|
1021112_29112017
|
Ilnseher v. Germany (nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14)
|
2017-11-29 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"10211/12",
"27505/14"
] |
001-170653
|
CASE OF ILNSEHER v. GERMANY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170653
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0202JUD001021112
|
CHAMBER
|
2017-02-02 00:00:00
| 4
|
[
"5",
"5-1",
"5-4",
"6",
"6-1",
"7",
"7-1"
] |
[
"DEU"
] |
No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);No violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Heavier penalty);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal)
|
FALSE
|
|||
3
|
1021112_29112017
|
Ilnseher v. Germany (nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14)
|
2017-11-29 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"10211/12",
"27505/14"
] |
001-187540
|
CASE OF ILNSEHER v. GERMANY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187540
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1204JUD001021112
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2018-12-04 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"5",
"5-1",
"5-1-a",
"5-1-c",
"5-1-e",
"5-4",
"6",
"6-1",
"7",
"7-1",
"41"
] |
[
"DEU"
] |
Section 316f §§ 2 and 3 of the Introductory Act to the Criminal Code ; Preventive Detention (Distinction) Act ; Bavarian Preventive Detention Execution Act ; Sections 7(2) and 105(1) of the Juvenile Courts Act ; Sections 1(1) and 4 of the Therapy Detention Act ; Articles 63, 66 and 67d § 2 of the Criminal Code ; Basic Law
|
Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809/08, § 78, 21 June 2016;Aurnhammer v. Germany (dec.), no. 36356/10, § 35, 21 October 2014;B. v. Germany, no. 61272/09, § 68, 19 April 2012;Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, ECHR 2000 III;Bergmann v. Germany, no. 23279/14, 7 January 2016;Biziuk v. Poland (no. 2), no. 24580/06, § 47, 17 January 2012;Brand v. the Netherlands, no. 49902/99, § 62, 11 May 2004;C.B. v. Romania, no. 21207/03, 20 April 2010;Del Río Prada v. Spain [GC], no. 42750/09, ECHR 2013;Erkalo v. the Netherlands, 2 September 1998, § 52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VI;Fešar v. the Czech Republic, no. 76576/01, § 68, 13 November 2008;Frasik v. Poland, no. 22933/02, § 63, ECHR 2010 (extracts);G. v. Germany, no. 65210/09, §§ 70 et seq., 7 June 2012;G.B. v. Switzerland, no. 27426/95, §§ 27 and 32-39, 30 November 2000;Glien v. Germany, no. 7345/12, 28 November 2013;Göç v. Turkey [GC], no. 36590/97, §§ 36-37, ECHR 2002 V;H.L. v. the United Kingdom, no. 45508/99, § 98, ECHR 2004 IX;H.W. v. Germany, no. 17167/11, §§ 107 and 113, 19 September 2013;Hutchison Reid v. the United Kingdom, no. 50272/99, ECHR 2003 IV;Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 154, 22 May 2012;Ilnseher v. Germany, nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14, 2 February 2017;Jamil v. France, 8 June 1995, § 30, Series A no. 317 B;Jendrowiak v. Germany, no. 30060/04, § 35, 14 April 2011;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, §§ 140-141, ECHR 2001 VII;K. v. Germany, no. 61827/09, §§ 79 et seq., 7 June 2012;Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, ECHR 2008;Karamanof v. Greece, no. 46372/09, § 42, 26 July 2011;Kharin v. Russia, no. 37345/03, § 31, 3 February 2011;Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00, § 124, ECHR 2006 XII (extracts);Klinkenbuß v. Germany, no. 53157/11, § 48, 25 February 2016;Lebedev v. Russia, no. 4493/04, §§ 96-102, 25 October 2007;Luberti v. Italy, 23 February 1984, § 28, Series A no. 75;M. v. Germany, no. 19359/04, ECHR 2009;Mercan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 56511/16, § 24, 8 November 2016;Mooren v. Germany [GC], no. 11364/03, § 106, 9 July 2009;Muršić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, §§ 136 et seq., ECHR 2016;Musiał v. Poland [GC], no. 24557/94, § 47, ECHR 1999 II;Navarra v. France, 23 November 1993, § 28, Series A no. 273 B;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358/12, § 84, 24 January 2017;Petschulies v. Germany, no. 6281/13, 2 June 2016;Piotr Baranowski v. Poland, no. 39742/05, §§ 63-64, 2 October 2007;R.M.D. v. Switzerland, 26 September 1997, § 42, Reports 1997 VI;Rakevich v. Russia, no. 58973/00, § 26, 28 October 2003;Reiner v. Germany, no. 28527/08, § 83, 19 January 2012;Ruiz Rivera v. Switzerland, no. 8300/06, § 59, 18 February 2014;S. v. Germany, no. 3300/10, § 81, 28 June 2012;S.T.S. v. the Netherlands, no. 277/05, § 43, ECHR 2011;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13229/03, § 67, ECHR 2008;Sabeva v. Bulgaria, no. 44290/07, § 58, 10 June 2010;Şahin Alpay v. Turkey, no. 16538/17, § 137, ECHR 2018;Schmitz v. Germany, no. 30493/04, 9 June 2011;Shcherbina v. Russia, no. 41970/11, 26 June 2014;Shimovolos v. Russia, no. 30194/09, § 51, 21 June 2011;Simeonovi v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 21980/04, § 83, 12 May 2017;Sisojeva and Others v. Latvia (striking out) [GC], no. 60654/00, § 61, ECHR 2007 I;Smatana v. the Czech Republic, no. 18642/04, 27 September 2007;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 143 & 145, ECHR 2012,;Stephens v. Malta (no. 2), no. 33740/06, § 84, 21 April 2009;Ťupa v. the Czech Republic, no. 39822/07, § 47, 26 May 2011;V.K. v. Russia, no. 9139/08, § 30, 4 April 2017;Van der Velden v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 29514/05, ECHR 2006 XV;Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/96, §§ 46- 47, ECHR 2000 X;Vogt v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 45553/06, § 36, 3 June 2014;W.P. v. Germany, no. 55594/13, § 49, 6 October 2016;Welch v. the United Kingdom, 9 February 1995, Series A no. 307 A;Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33;Witek v. Poland, no. 13453/07, § 41, 21 December 2010;Žúbor v. Slovakia, no. 7711/06, § 89, 6 December 2011
|
No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind);No violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Heavier penalty;Retroactivity);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal)
|
TRUE
|
|
4
|
1051110_14012015
|
Murray v. the Netherlands (no. 10511/10)
|
2015-01-14 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"10511/10"
] |
001-138893
|
CASE OF MURRAY v. THE NETHERLANDS
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-138893
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1210JUD001051110
|
CHAMBER
|
2013-12-10 00:00:00
| 4
|
[
"3"
] |
[
"NLD"
] |
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect)
|
FALSE
|
|||
5
|
1051110_14012015
|
Murray v. the Netherlands (no. 10511/10)
|
2015-01-14 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"10511/10"
] |
001-162614
|
CASE OF MURRAY v. THE NETHERLANDS
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-162614
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0426JUD001051110
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2016-04-26 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"3",
"34",
"41"
] |
[
"NLD"
] |
A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455/05, § 128, ECHR 2009;Aerts v. Belgium, 30 July 1998, § 66, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-V;Bodein v. France, no. 40014/10, § 61, 13 November 2014;Carrella v. Italy, no. 33955/07, §§ 48-51, 9 September 2014;Creangă v. Romania [GC], no. 29226/03, § 130, 23 February 2012;Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362/04, § 28, ECHR 2007 V;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 123, ECHR 2010;Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos. 15018/11 and 61199/12, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Herczegfalvy v. Austria, 24 September 1992, § 82, Series A no. 244;James, Wells and Lee v. the United Kingdom, nos. 25119/09, 57715/09 and 57877/09, 18 September 2012;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, ECHR 2001 VII;Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, ECHR 2008;Khoroshenko v. Russia [GC], no. 41418/04, §§ 121 and 144 145, ECHR 2015;Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 94, ECHR 2000 XI;Larionovs and Tess v. Latvia (dec.), nos. 45520/04 and 19363/05, § 172, 25 November 2014;László Magyar v. Hungary, no. 73593/10, 20 May 2014;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696/09, § 418, ECHR 2011;Maiorano and Others v. Italy, no. 28634/06, §§ 115 122, 15 December 2009;Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no. 33071/96, ECHR 2000 XII;Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703/97, § 72, ECHR 2002 VIII;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593/08, § 128, ECHR 2012;Naumenko v. Ukraine, no. 42023/98, § 112, 10 February 2004;Öcalan v. Turkey (no. 2), nos. 24069/03, 197/04, 6201/06 and 10464/07, § 203, 18 March 2014;Raffray Taddei v. France, no. 36435/07, 21 December 2010;Sławomir Musiał v. Poland, no. 28300/06, § 87, 20 January 2009;Trabelsi v. Belgium, no. 140/10, § 137, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Vinter and Others v. the United Kingdom, [GC], nos. 66069/09, 130/10 and 3896/10, ECHR 2013 (extracts)
|
Report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to Aruba and the Netherlands Antilles in 2007
|
Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 34 - Locus standi;Victim);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading punishment;Inhuman punishment) (Substantive aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
|
6
|
1061316_23052017
|
Sharxhi and Others v. Albania (no. 10613/16)
|
2017-05-23 00:00:00
|
Chamber hearing
|
[
"10613/16"
] |
001-162869
|
SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-162869
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
| 4
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"8",
"8-1",
"13",
"14",
"P1-1"
] |
[
"ALB"
] |
Communicated
| ||||||
7
|
1061316_23052017
|
Sharxhi and Others v. Albania (no. 10613/16)
|
2017-05-23 00:00:00
|
Chamber hearing
|
[
"10613/16"
] |
001-179867
|
CASE OF SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179867
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0111JUD001061316
|
CHAMBER
|
2018-01-11 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"13",
"13+6-1",
"13+8",
"13+P1-1",
"35",
"35-1",
"35-3-a",
"41",
"P1-1",
"P1-1-1"
] |
[
"ALB"
] |
Non Contractual Liability of the State Act (Law no. 8510 of 15 July 1999) ; Inspection of Buildings Act (Law no. 9780 of 16 July 2007) ; Civil Code
|
Akkuş v. Turkey, 9 July 1997, § 29, Reports 1997-IV;Almeida Garrett, Mascarenhas Falcão and Others v. Portugal, nos. 29813/96 and 30229/96, § 54, ECHR 2000 I;Apostol v. Georgia, no. 40765/02, §§ 64-65, ECHR 2006‑XI;Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131;Brumărescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, §§ 76-78, ECHR 1999 VII;Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 33509/04, § 68, ECHR 2009;Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 35, ECHR 2002 III;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433/09, § 82, ECHR 2012;Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 29, ECHR 2000‑IV;Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium (Article 50), 10 March 1972, §§ 15 16, Series A no. 14;Delijorgji v. Albania, no. 6858/11, § 100, 28 April 2015;Demades v. Turkey, no. 16219/90, 31 July 2003;Driza v. Albania, no. 33771/02, §§ 119-120, ECHR 2007 V (extracts);Fleri Soler and Camilleri v. Malta, no. 35349/05, § 65, 26 September 2006;Frendo Randon and Others v. Malta, no. 2226/10, 22 November 2011;Gjyli v. Albania, no. 32907/07, §§ 55-61, 29 September 2009;Guiso-Gallisay v. Italy (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 58858/00, 22 December 2009;Hornsby v. Greece, 19 March 1997, § 40, Reports 1997 II;Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no. 31107/96, § 66, ECHR 1999 II;Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 49, ECHR 1999-V;Jahn and Others v. Germany [GC], nos. 46720/99, 72203/01 and 72552/01, §§ 91-94, ECHR 2005-VI;James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, § 37, Series A no. 98;Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, § 106, Reports 1998 I;Khalikova v. Azerbaijan, no. 42883/11, §§ 128-129, 22 October 2015;Kolona v. Cyprus, no. 28025/03, §§ 70-78, 27 September 2007;Kozacıoğlu v. Turkey [GC], no. 2334/03, 19 February 2009;Kübler v. Germany, no. 32715/06, §§ 60-66, 13 January 2011;Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 31210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-XI;Loizidou v. Turkey (merits), no. 15318/89, 18 December 1996, Reports 1996 VI;Luli and Others v. Albania, nos. 64480/09 and 5 others, §§ 77-84 and §§ 114-119, 1 April 2014;Manushaqe Puto and Others v. Albania, nos. 604/07 and 3 others, §§ 33-35, 31 July 2012;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056/06, §§ 87-89, ECHR 2009;Mikheyev v. Russia, no. 77617/01, § 155, 26 January 2006;Montanaro Gauci and Others v. Malta, no. 31454/12, §§ 41-48, 30 August 2016;Mullai and Others v. Albania (just satisfaction – striking out), no. 9074/07, § 18, 18 October 2011;O’Keeffe v. Ireland [GC], no. 35810/09, §§ 109-111, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Okyay and Others v. Turkey, no. 36220/97, ECHR 2005 VII;Oliari and Others v. Italy, nos. 18766/11 and 36030/11, § 78, 21 July 2015;Öneryıldız v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, ECHR 2004 XII;Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece, 24 June 1993, Series A no. 260 B;Paplauskienė v. Lithuania, no. 31102/06, § 51, 14 October 2014;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358/12, § 169, ECHR 2017;Pavić v. Croatia, no. 21846/08, § 38, 28 January 2010;Sabanchiyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 38450/05, § 153, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Salah v. the Netherlands, no. 8196/02, §§ 65-67, ECHR 2006 IX (extracts);Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan [GC], no. 40167/06, § 217, ECHR 2015;Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, ECHR 2006 V;Serghides and Christoforou v. Cyprus (just satisfaction), no. 44730/98, § 29, 12 June 2003;Serkov v. Ukraine, no. 39766/05, § 33, 7 July 2011;Serrilli v. Italy (just satisfaction), no. 77822/01, § 17, 17 July 2008;Silva Barreira Júnior v. Portugal, nos. 38317/06 and 38319/06, § 40, 11 January 2011;Société Colas Est and Others v. France, no. 37971/97, § § 41-42, ECHR 2002 III;Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, §§ 63 and 69-74, Series A no. 52;The Holy Monasteries v. Greece, 9 December 1994, § 71, Series A no. 301-A;Urbárska Obec Trenčianske Biskupice v. Slovakia, no. 74258/01, § 115, ECHR 2007-XIII;Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 108, ECHR 2001-V;Zollmann v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62902/00, ECHR 2003-XII
|
Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;Violation of Article 13+6-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 6-1 - Access to court;Fair hearing;Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Right to a fair trial);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Administrative proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Fair hearing);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for home);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8-2 - Interference;In accordance with the law;Article 8-1 - Respect for home;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Violation of Article 13+P1-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Prescribed by law;Interference;Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property);Violation of Article 13+P1-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Interference;Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Deprivation of property;Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
FALSE
|
|
8
|
1086509_02102013
|
Mocanu and Others v. Romania (nos 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08)
|
2013-10-02 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"10865/09",
"45886/07",
"32431/08"
] |
001-114752
|
CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-114752
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD001086509
|
CHAMBER
|
2012-11-13 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"2",
"2-1",
"3",
"6",
"6-1",
"35",
"41"
] |
[
"ROU"
] |
Association 21 December 1989 and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810/07 and 18817/08, 24 May 2011;C.G. and Others v. Bulgaria (dec.), no 1365/07, 13 March 2007;Chirita v. Romania (dec.), no 37147/02, 6 September 2007;Delgado v. France, no 38437/97, Commission decision of 9 September 1998;Dzieciak v. Poland, no 77766/01, § 80, 9 December 2008;Erdogan Yagiz, no 27473/02, §§ 43-44, 6 March 2007;Folgerø and Others v. Norway (dec.), no 15472/02, 14 February 2006;Frandes v. Romania (dec.), no 35802/05, 17 May 2011;Frydlender v. France [GC], no 30979/96, ECHR 2000-VII;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978/05, § 92, ECHR 2010-...;Güleç v. Turkey, 27 July 1998, §§ 77-78, Reports 1998-IV;Isayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 57947/00, 57948/00 and 57949/00, §§ 208-213, 24 February 2005;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772/95, ECHR 2000-IV;Lapusan and Others v. Romania, nos. 29007/06, 30552/06, 31323/06, 31920/06, 34485/06, 38960/06, 38996/06, 39027/06 and 39067/06, § 61, 8 March 2011;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no 28883/95, § 115, ECHR 2001-III;Melinte v. Romania, no 43247/02, §§ 33-36, 9 November 2006;Rupa v. Romania (no 1), no 58478/00, § 90, 16 December 2008;Saileanu v. Romania, no 46268/06, § 50, 2 February 2010;Sandru and Others v. Romania, no 22465/03, 8 December 2009;Selçuk and Asker v. Turkey, 24 April 1998, § 68, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II;Selmouni v. France [GC], no 25803/94, ECHR 1999-V;Sfrijan v. Romania, no 20366/04, §§ 44-48, 22 November 2007;Šilih v. Slovenia, [GC], no 71463/01, §§ 159-163, 9 April 2009;Smirnova and Smirnova v. Russia (dec.), nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, 3 October 2002;Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044/96, 35532/97 and 44801/98, §§ 80-81, ECHR 2001-II;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no 2) [GC], no 32772/02, § 63, ECHR 2009-...;Yasa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, § 74, Reports 1998-VI
|
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award
|
TRUE
|
||
9
|
1086509_02102013
|
Mocanu and Others v. Romania (nos 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08)
|
2013-10-02 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"10865/09",
"45886/07",
"32431/08"
] |
001-146540
|
CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146540
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0917JUD001086509
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2014-09-17 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"2",
"2-1",
"3",
"6",
"6-1",
"35",
"35-1",
"35-3",
"41"
] |
[
"ROU"
] |
Abdülsamet Yaman v. Turkey, no 32446/96, § 55, 2 November 2004;Agache and Others v. Romania, no 2712/02, §§ 70-73, 20 October 2009;Ahmet Özkan and Others v. Turkey, no 21689/93, §§ 310 and 358, 6 April 2004;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports 1996 IV;Akhvlediani and Others v. Georgia (dec.), no 22026/10, §§ 23-29, 9 April 2013;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 55721/07, §§ 162-167, ECHR 2011;Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, § 102, Reports 1998 VIII;Association « 21 Decembre 1989 » and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810/07 and 18817/08, 24 May 2011;Atallah v. France (dec.), no 51987/07, 30 August 2011;Aydinlar and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no 3575/05, 9 March 2010;Balogh v. Hungary, no 47940/99, § 30, 20 July 2004;Barbu Anghelescu v. Romania, no 46430/99, § 67, 5 October 2004;Bayram and Yıldırım v. Turkey (dec.), no 38587/97, ECHR 2002-III;Blečić v. Croatia [GC], no 59532/00, § 67, ECHR 2006 III;Brecknell v. the United Kingdom, no 32457/04, § 71, 27 November 2007;Bulut and Yavuz (dec.), no 76065/01, 28 May 2002;Bursuc v. Romania, no 42066/98, § 107, 12 October 2004;Çamdereli v. Turkey, no 28433/02, § 38, 17 July 2008;Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (dec.) [GC], no 13216/05, § 136, 14 December 2011;Crăiniceanu and Frumuşanu v. Romania, no 12442/04, § 92, 24 April 2012;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113/99 and Others, § 69, ECHR 2010;Dennis and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 76573/01, 2 July 2002;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630/09, ECHR 2012;Er and Others v. Turkey, no 23016/04, § 52, 31 July 2012;Frandes v. Romania (dec.), no. 35802/05, 17 May 2011;Frydlender v. France [GC], no 30979/96, § 46, ECHR 2000 VII;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978/05, § 117, ECHR 2010;Gheorghe and Maria Mihaela Dumitrescu v. Romania, no 6373, §§ 26-28, 29 July 2008;Gürtekin and Others v. Cyprus (dec.), nos. 60441/13, 68206/13 and 68667/13, 11 March 2014;Gusar v. Moldova (dec.), no 37204/02, §§ 14-17, 30 April 2013;Halat v. Turkey, no 23607/08, § 51, 8 November 2011;Haralambie v. Romania, no 21737/03, § 70, 27 October 2009;Isayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 57947/00, 57948/00 and 57949/00, § 149, 24 February 2005;Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 55508/07 and 29520/09, §§ 128-151, 21 October 2013;Jularić v. Croatia, no 20106/06, §§ 45-51, 20 January 2011;Kurić and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no 26828/06, § 286, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Lăpuşan and Others v. Romania, nos. 29007/06, 30552/06, 31323/06, 31920/06, 34485/06, 38960/06, 38996/06, 39027/06 and 39067/06, 8 March 2011;M.B. v. Romania, no 43982/06, § 64, 3 November 2011;M.C. v. Bulgaria, no 39272/98, § 150, ECHR 2003 XII;McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, § 161, Series A no 324;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no 31333/06, § 107, 10 September 2010;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no 28883/95, §§ 114-115, ECHR 2001-III;Micu v. Romania, no 29883/06, § 108, 8 February 2011;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, §§ 110 and 112-113, ECHR 2005-VII;Narin v. Turkey, no 18907/02, § 51, 15 December 2009;Nasirkhayeva v. Russia (dec.), no 1721/07, 31 May 2011;Paçacı and Others v. Turkey, no 3064/07, §§ 63-66, 8 November 2011;Palić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no 4704/04, § 52, 15 February 2011;Pastor and Ţiclete v. Romania, nos. 30911/06 and 40967/06, § 58, 19 April 2011;Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 46477/99, 4 June 2001;Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no 52391/99, §§ 324-325, ECHR 2007 II;Ringeisen v. Austria, 16 July 1971, § 89, Series A no 13;Röman v. Finland, no 13072/05, § 50, 29 January 2013;Sabri Güneş v. Turkey [GC], no 27396/06, § 39, 29 June 2012;Şandru and Others v. Romania, no 22465/03, §§ 55 59, 8 December 2009;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan (dec.) [GC], no 40167/06, § 135, 14 December 2011;Scoppola v. Italy (no 2) [GC], no 10249/03, § 70, 17 September 2009;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no 56581/00, § 46, ECHR 2006 II;Šilih v. Slovenia [GC], no 71463/01, §§ 159-163, 9 April 2009;Soering v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no 161, p. 34, § 88;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064/90, 16065/90, 16066/90, 16068/90, 16069/90, 16070/90, 16071/90, 16072/90 and 16073/90, ECHR 2009;Velev v. Bulgaria, no 43531/08, §§ 59-60, 16 April 2013;Vučković and Others v. Serbia [GC], nos. 17153/11 and Others, 25 March 2014;Walker v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 34979/97, ECHR 2000 I;Yaşa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, § 74, Reports 1998 VI;Yeter v. Turkey, no 33750/03, § 70, 13 January 2009;Yetişen and Others v. Turkey, no 21099/06, §§ 72-85, 10 July 2012
|
General Comment No. 3 (2012) issued by the United Nations Committee against Torture on the Implementation by States parties of Article 14 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
|
Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Six month period;Article 35-3 - Continuing situation);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time);Non-pecuniary damage - award;Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed
|
TRUE
|
|
10
|
1113810_04022015
|
Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia (no. 11138/10)
|
2015-02-04 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"11138/10"
] |
001-145069
|
MOZER v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145069
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
| 4
|
[
"2",
"2-1",
"3",
"5",
"5-1",
"5-1-a",
"5-1-b",
"8",
"8-1",
"9",
"9-1",
"13",
"17"
] |
[
"MDA",
"RUS"
] | |||||||
11
|
1113810_04022015
|
Mozer v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia (no. 11138/10)
|
2015-02-04 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"11138/10"
] |
001-161055
|
CASE OF MOZER v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161055
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0223JUD001113810
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2016-02-23 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"1",
"3",
"5",
"5-1",
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"9",
"9-1",
"9-2",
"13",
"13+3",
"13+8-1",
"13+9-1",
"35",
"35-1",
"35-3",
"41"
] |
[
"MDA",
"RUS"
] |
Law of the Republic of Moldova no. 1545 (1998) on compensation for damage caused by illegal acts of the criminal investigation bodies
|
Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 24, Series A no. 32;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, §§ 65-66, Reports 1996 IV;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721/07, §§ 136 and 149, ECHR 2011;Asproftas v. Turkey, no. 16079/90, § 72, 27 May 2010;Banković and Others v. Belgium and Others (dec.) [GC], no. 52207/99, § 70, ECHR 2001 XII;Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, § 86, ECHR 2015;Catan and Others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], nos. 43370/04, 8252/05 and 18454/06, § 114, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 148, ECHR 2014;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, § 145, Reports 1996 V;Chiragov and Others v. Armenia [GC], no. 13216/05, § 168, ECHR 2015;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781/94, ECHR 2001 IV;De Souza Ribeiro v. France [GC], no. 22689/07, § 78, ECHR 2012;Del Río Prada v. Spain [GC], no. 42750/09, § 125, ECHR 2013;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, § 95, ECHR 2010-I;Enea v. Italy [GC], no. 74912/01, § 55, ECHR 2009;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, § 104, Series A no. 22;Foka v. Turkey, no. 28940/95, 24 June 2008;Gherghina v. Romania [GC] (dec.), no. 42219/07, §§ 84-85, 9 July 2015;Gladkiy v. Russia, no. 3242/03, § 83, 21 December 2010;Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 93, 22 May 2012;Ilaşcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, ECHR 2004 VII;Ivanţoc and Others v. Moldova and Russia, no. 23687/05, 15 November 2011;Khoroshenko v. Russia [GC], no. 41418/04, § 106, ECHR 2015;Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000 XI;L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom, 9 June 1998, §§ 36-41, Reports 1998 III;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV;Lavents v. Latvia, no. 58442/00, § 139, 28 November 2002;Lawless v. Ireland (merits), 1 July 1961, § 7, Series A no. 3;Loizidou v. Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, § 62, Series A no. 310;Loizidou v. Turkey (merits), 18 December 1996, § 52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 VI;Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, § 51, ECHR 2004 XI;Messina v. Italy (no. 2), no. 25498/94, §§ 61-62, ECHR 2000 X;Orban and Others v. France, no. 20985/05, § 33, 15 January 2009;Osman v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1998, §§ 115-122, Reports 1998 VIII;Pakhomov v. Russia, no. 44917/08, § 61, 30 September 2010;Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 67, ECHR 2001-III;Petrakidou v. Turkey, no. 16081/90, § 71, 27 May 2010;Poltoratskiy v. Ukraine, no. 38812/97, § 167, ECHR 2003 V;Protopapa v. Turkey, no. 16084/90, 24 February 2009;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan [GC], no. 40167/06, § 128, ECHR 2015;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 46, ECHR 2006 II;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, § 116, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Union européenne des droits de l’homme and Josephides v. Turkey (dec.), no. 7116/10, § 9, 2 April 2013;Vučković and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153/11 and 29 others, § 70, 25 March 2014;Vučković and Others v. Serbia, nos. 17153/11 and 29 others, 28 August 2012;Yaşa v. Turkey, 2 September 1998, §§ 92-108, Reports 1998 VI
|
Opinion No. 188 (1995) of the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly on the application by Moldova for membership of the Council of Europe
|
Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione loci;Ratione personae) (Russia);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies) (the Republic of Moldova);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (Russia);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention) (Russia);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (Russia);Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion) (Russia);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Russia);Violation of Article 13+8-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (Russia);Violation of Article 13+9-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion;Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion) (Russia);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 13+8-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (the Republic of Moldova);No violation of Article 13+9-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion;Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion) (the Republic of Moldova);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (Russia);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (Russia)
|
TRUE
|
12
|
1188210_17122014
|
Pentikäinen v. Finland (no. 11882/10)
|
2014-12-17 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"11882/10"
] |
001-115953
|
PENTIKAINEN v. FINLAND
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115953
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
|
2011-05-19 00:00:00
| 4
|
[
"10"
] |
[
"FIN"
] |
Communicated
|
FALSE
|
||||
13
|
1188210_17122014
|
Pentikäinen v. Finland (no. 11882/10)
|
2014-12-17 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"11882/10"
] |
001-140395
|
CASE OF PENTIKÄINEN v. FINLAND
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-140395
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0204JUD001188210
|
CHAMBER
|
2014-02-04 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2"
] |
[
"FIN"
] |
Section 4 of the Penal Code
|
Barfod v. Denmark, 22 February 1989, § 28, Series A no. 149;Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 58, ECHR 1999-III;De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, 24 February 1997, § 37, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 I;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 45, ECHR 1999-I;Janowski v. Poland [GC], no. 25716/94, § 30, ECHR 1999-I;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, § 31, Series A no. 298;Juppala v. Finland, no. 18620/03, § 40, 2 December 2008;Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, Series A no. 103;Najafli v. Azerbaijan, no. 2594/07, § 68, 2 October 2012;News Verlags GmbH & Co.KG v. Austria, no. 31457/96, § 52, ECHR 2000-I;Nikula v. Finland, no. 31611/96, § 44, ECHR 2002 II;Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 43, ECHR 1999-VIII;Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30
|
No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)
|
TRUE
|
|
14
|
1188210_17122014
|
Pentikäinen v. Finland (no. 11882/10)
|
2014-12-17 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"11882/10"
] |
001-158279
|
CASE OF PENTIKÄINEN v. FINLAND
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-158279
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1020JUD001188210
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2015-10-20 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2"
] |
[
"FIN"
] |
Section 19 of the Police Act, in Chapter 1 ; Section 2, subsection 2, of the Coercive Measures Act ; Chapter 16, section 4, of the Penal Code ; Section 24, subsection 2, of the Criminal Investigations Act
|
Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876/08, § 100, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, ECHR 1999-III;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433/09, § 140, ECHR 2012;Cumpănă and Mazăre v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, § 116, ECHR 2004 XI;Dammann v. Switzerland, no. 77551/01, § 52, 25 April 2006;De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, 24 February 1997, § 37, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 I;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, ECHR 1999 I;Gsell v. Switzerland, no. 12675/05, § 49, 8 October 2009;Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, § 49 in fine, Series A no. 24;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, § 31, Series A no. 298;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, § 141, ECHR 2001 VII;Kasabova v. Bulgaria, no. 22385/03, §§ 61 and 63-68, 19 April 2011;Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, § 59, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II;Krone Verlag GmbH v. Austria, no. 27306/07, §§ 46-47, 19 June 2012;Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, § 29, Series A no. 176-A;Monnat v. Switzerland, no. 73604/01, § 66, ECHR 2006-X;Morice v. France [GC], no. 29369/10, § 124, 23 April 2015;Najafli v. Azerbaijan, no. 2594/07, § 67, 2 October 2012;Novaya Gazeta and Borodyanskiy v. Russia, no. 14087/08, § 37, 28 March 2013;Perna v. Italy [GC], no. 48898/99, § 47, ECHR 2003 V;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 52, ECHR 2000-V;Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no. 69698/01, ECHR 2007 V;Taranenko v. Russia, no. 19554/05, § 95, 15 May 2014;The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, § 65, Series A no. 30;The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 2), 26 November 1991, § 51, Series A no. 217;Times Newspapers Ltd v. the United Kingdom (nos. 1 and 2), nos. 3002/03 and 23676/03, ECHR 2009;Ungváry and Irodalom Kft v. Hungary, no. 64520/10, § 42, 3 December 2013;Yordanova and Toshev v. Bulgaria, no. 5126/05, §§ 53 and 55, 2 October 2012
|
No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)
|
TRUE
|
|
15
|
1214818_22012019
|
A.M. v. France (no. 12148/18)
|
2019-01-22 00:00:00
|
Chamber hearing
|
[
"12148/18"
] |
001-192958
|
CASE OF A.M. v. FRANCE
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-192958
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0429JUD001214818
|
CHAMBER
|
2019-04-29 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"3",
"35",
"35-1",
"41"
] |
[
"FRA"
] |
Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 69, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Azzolina and Others v. Italy, nos. 28923/09 and 67599/10, § 105, 26 October 2017;Bahaddar v. the Netherlands, 19 February 1998, §§ 47-48, Reports 1998 I;Baumann v. France, no 33592/96, § 47, ECHR 2001 V (extracts);Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V, p. 1855, § 79;Daoudi v. France, no 19576/08, 3 December 2009;F.G. v. Sweden [GC], no 43611/11, §§ 111-118, 23 March 2016;Gebremedhin [Gaberamadhien] v. France, no 25389/05, §§ 64-66, ECHR 2007 II;J.K. and Others v. Sweden [GC], no 59166/12, 23 August 2016;Karoussiotis v. Portugal, no 23205/08, § 57, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Kuric and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no 26828/06, § 286, 26 June 2012;M.A. v. France, no 9373/15, 1 February 2018;M.X. v. France (no 21580/10, § 37, 1 July 2014;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no 17056/06, § 55, ECHR 2009;NA. v. the United Kingdom, no 25904/07, § 90, 17 July 2008;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no 10593/08, § 142, ECHR 2012;Rafaa v. France, no 25393/10, § 33, 30 May 2013;Raninen v. Finland, 16 December 1997, § 41, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VIII;Ringeisen v. Austria, 16 July 1971, § 89, Series A no 13;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no 37201/06, § 128, ECHR 2008;Sahin Alpay v. Turkey, no 16538/17, § 86, 20 March 2018;Selmouni v. France [GC], no 25803/94, § 95, ECHR 1999-V;Stanka Mirkovic and Others v. Montenegro, nos. 33781/15 and 3 others, § 48, 7 March 2017;Trabelsi v. Belgium, no 140/10, § 89, ECHR 2014 (extracts);X v. the Netherlands, no 14319/17, § 72, 10 July 2018;Y.P. and L.P. v. France, no 32476/06, § 53, 2 September 2010
|
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Algeria)
|
FALSE
|
||
16
|
1232311_02102012
|
Michaud v. France (nos. 12323/11)
|
2012-10-02 00:00:00
|
Chamber hearing
|
[
"12323/11"
] |
001-115377
|
CASE OF MICHAUD v. FRANCE
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115377
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1206JUD001232311
|
CHAMBER
|
2012-12-06 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"34",
"35"
] |
[
"FRA"
] |
Decision of the National Bar Council of 12 July 2007 “adopting regulations on internal procedures for implementing the obligation to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, and an internal supervisory mechanism to guarantee compliance with those procedures” ; Article 21-1 of the Law of 31 December 1971 ; Law no. 2004-130 of 11 February 2004 ; Monetary and Financial Code
|
André and Other v. France, no 18603/03, 24 July 2008;Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi v. Ireland [GC], no 45036/98, ECHR 2005-VI;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 13378/05, §§ 33-34, ECHR 2008;Campbell v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1992, §§ 44 and 46-48, Series A no 233;Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1981, § 41, Series A no 28;Ekinci and Akalin v. Turkey, no 77097/01, § 47, 30 January 2007;Frérot v. France, no 70204/01, §§ 53-54, 12 June 2007;Grifhorst v. France, no 28336/02, § 93, 26 February 2009;Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 18 December 1986, § 42, Series A no 112;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 52, Series A no 260-A;Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no 30696/09, ECHR 2011;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, § 27, Series A no 31;Mor v. France, no 28198/09, 15 December 2011;Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, Series A no 251-B;Norris v. Ireland, 26 October 1988, §§ 30-34 and 38, Series A no 142;Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, no 51772/99, ECHR 2003-IV;Sallinen and Others v. Finland, no 50882/99, 27 September 2005;Schönenberger and Durmaz v. Switzerland, 20 June 1988, Series A no 137;Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1983, §§ 56-88, Series A no 61;Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no 74336/01, §§ 65-66, ECHR 2007-IV;Xavier Da Silveira v. France, no 43757/05, § 36-37 and 43, 21 January 2010
|
Directive 91/308/EEC, 10 June 1991;Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union;Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;Articles 169, 170, 173, 175, 177, 184 and 189 of the Treaty establishing the European Community;Recommendations 12 and 16 of the financial action task force (“FATF”) on money laundering;Council of Europe Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime and on the Financing of Terrorism (16 May 2005)
|
Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence;Respect for private life)
|
FALSE
|
17
|
1273810_13112013
|
Jeunesse v. the Netherlands (no.12738/10)
|
2013-11-13 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"12738/10"
] |
001-115732
|
JEUNESSE v. THE NETHERLANDS
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115732
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1204DEC001273810
|
DECISIONS
| 4
|
[
"3",
"5",
"5-1-f",
"5-4",
"5-5",
"8",
"13",
"14",
"14+8",
"35",
"P4-3",
"P12-1"
] |
[
"NLD"
] |
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible
| |||||
18
|
1273810_13112013
|
Jeunesse v. the Netherlands (no.12738/10)
|
2013-11-13 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"12738/10"
] |
001-115788
|
JEUNESSE v. THE NETHERLANDS
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115788
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
|
2012-12-04 00:00:00
| 4
|
[
"3",
"5",
"5-1",
"5-4",
"8",
"8-1"
] |
[
"NLD"
] |
FALSE
|
|||||
19
|
1273810_13112013
|
Jeunesse v. the Netherlands (no.12738/10)
|
2013-11-13 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"12738/10"
] |
001-147117
|
CASE OF JEUNESSE v. THE NETHERLANDS
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-147117
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1003JUD001273810
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2014-10-03 00:00:00
| 2
|
[
"8",
"8-1",
"41"
] |
[
"NLD"
] |
Aliens Act 1965 ; Aliens Act 2000 ; Article 3 of the Agreement between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Republic of Suriname concerning the assignment of nationality
|
Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94, p. 94, § 68;Ahmut v. the Netherlands, 28 November 1996, § 63, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 VI;Ajayi and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 27663/95, 22 June 1999;Arvelo Aponte v. the Netherlands, no. 28770/05, §§ 57-58, 3 November 2011;B.V. v. Sweden (dec.), no. 57442/11, 13 November 2012;Benamar v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 43786/04, 5 April 2005;Boultif v. Switzerland, no. 54273/00, ECHR 2001 IX;Butt v. Norway, no. 47017/09, § 78, 4 December 2012;Chandra and Others v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 53102/99, 13 May 2003;Darren Omoregie and Others v. Norway, no. 265/07, § 64, 31 July 2008;Djokaba Lambi Longa v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 33917/12, § 81, 9 October 2012;M. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 25087/06, 24 June 2008;Maslov v. Austria [GC], no. 1638/03, ECHR 2008;Mitchell v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 40447/98, 24 November 1998;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no. 41615/07, § 135, ECHR 2010;Nunez v. Norway, no. 55597/09, § 66, 28 June 2011;Popov v. France, nos. 39472/07 and 39474/07, §§ 139-140, 19 January 2012;Priya v. Denmark (dec.), no. 13594/03, 6 July 2006;Rodrigues da Silva and Hoogkamer v. the Netherlands, no. 50435/99, ECHR 2006-I;Savasci v. Germany (dec.), no. 45971/08, 19 March 2013;Tuquabo-Tekle and Others v. the Netherlands, no. 60665/00, § 44, 1 December 2005;Udeh v. Switzerland, no. 12020/09, 16 April 2013;Ullens de Schooten and Rezabek v. Belgium, nos. 3989/07 and 38353/07, § 54, 20 September 2011;Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410/99, ECHR 2006 XII;Useinov v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 61292/00, 11 April 2006;X v. Latvia [GC], no. 27853/09, § 96, ECHR 2013
|
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award
|
TRUE
|
|
20
|
1321605_22012014
|
Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (no. 13216/05)
|
2014-01-22 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"13216/05"
] |
001-108383
|
CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108383
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1214DEC001321605
|
DECISIONS
| 2
|
[
"8",
"13",
"14",
"34",
"35",
"35-1",
"35-2",
"35-3",
"P1-1"
] |
[
"ARM"
] |
Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 55721/07, §§ 131-132 and 138-139, 7 July 2011;Blecic v. Croatia [GC], no 59532/00, §§ 70 and 86, ECHR 2006-III;Chrysostomos, Papachrysostomou and Loizidou v. Turkey, nos. 15299/89, 15300/89 and 15318/89, DR 68, p. 287;Cyprus v. Turkey, no. 8007/77, §§ 104, 174-175 and 184-186, decision of 10 July 1978, Decisions and Reports (DR) 13, p. 228;David v. Moldova, no. 41578/05, § 28, 27 February 2008;Demades v. Turkey, no. 16219/90, §§ 14-17, 31 July 2003;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, ECHR/ECHR 2010;Dogan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 8803-8811/02, 8813/02 and 8815-8819/02, §§ 111-114, ECHR 2004-VI;Eugenia Michaelidou Developments Ltd and Michael Tymvios v. Turkey, no. 16163/90, §§ 15-18, 31 July 2003;Folgerø and Others v. Norway (dec.), no. 15472/02, 14 February 2006;Harutyunyan v. Armenia, no. 36549/03, ECHR 2007-III;Içyer v. Turkey (dec.), no. 18888/02, § 73, ECHR 2006-I;Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, ECHR 2004-VII;J.A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd and J.A. Pye (Oxford) Land Ltd v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44302/02, ECHR 2007-X;Loizidou v. Turkey [GC], no. 15318/89, §§ 41-47 and 62-63, ECHR 1996-VI;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696/09, § 251, 21 January 2011;Malhous v. the Czech Republic [GC] (dec.), no. 33071/96, ECHR 2000-XII;Maltzan and Others v. Germany (dec.) [GC], nos. 71916/01, 71917/01 and 10260/02, § 74, ECHR 2005-V;Moldovan and Others and Rostas and Others v. Romania (dec.), nos. 41138/98 and 64320/01, 13 March 2001;OAO Neftyanaya Kompaniya Yukos v. Russia, 14902/04, §§ 520-526, 20 September 2011;Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece, 24 June 1993, §§ 39-46, Series A no. 260-B;Preussische Treuhand GmbH & Co. KG A.A. v. Poland (dec.), no. 47550/06, §§ 57-62, 7 October 2008;Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, §§ 84-86, ECHR 2001-VIII;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064/90, 16065/90, 16066/90, 16068/90, 16069/90, 16070/90, 16071/90, 16072/90 and 16073/90, 18 September 2009;Varnava and Others v. Turkey, nos. 16064/90, 16065/90, 16066/90, 16068/90, 16069/90, 16070/90, 16071/90, 16072/90 and 16073/90, decision of the Commission,14 April 1998, Decisions and Reports 93-B, pp. 5, 14;Vasilescu v. Romania, 22 May 1998, §§ 48-49, Reports 1998-III;Xenides-Arestis v. Turkey (dec.), no. 46347/99, 14 March 2005;Xenides-Arestis v. Turkey, no. 46347/99, § 28, 22 December 2005;Zalyan, Sargsyan and Serobyan v. Armenia (déc), nos. 36894/04 and 3521/07, 11 October 2007
|
Articles 25 and 28 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969
|
Admissible
| |||
21
|
1321605_22012014
|
Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (no. 13216/05)
|
2014-01-22 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"13216/05"
] |
001-155353
|
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155353
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD001321605
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2015-06-16 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"1",
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"13",
"34",
"35",
"35-1",
"35-3",
"41",
"P1-1",
"P1-1-1"
] |
[
"ARM"
] |
Articles 2.1 and 2.2 of the 1985 Instructions on Rules of Registration of Housing Facilities of the Azerbaijan SSR ; 1978 Constitution of the Azerbaijan SSR ; Articles 4, 25, 27 and 28 of the 1970 Land Code of the Azerbaijan SSR ; Article 10.3 of the 1983 Housing Code of the Azerbaijan SSR ; Article 32, section 1(8) of the 1992 Land Code of the Azerbaijan SSR
|
Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 55721/07, ECHR 2011;Catan and Others v. Moldova and Russia, [GC], nos. 43370/04, 8252/05 and 18454/06, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no 25781/94, § 76, ECHR 2001-IV;Damayev v. Russia, no 36150/04, §§ 108-111, 29 May 2012;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, § 69, ECHR 2010;Doğan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 8803-8811/02, 8813/02 and 8815-8819/02, ECHR 2004 VI (extracts);El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, [GC], no 39630/09, § 163, ECHR 2012;Elsanova v. Russia (dec.), no 57952/00, 15 November 2005;Ilaşcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia, [GC], no 48787/99, ECHR 2004-VII;Kerimova and Others v. Russia, nos. 17170/04, 20792/04, 22448/04, 23360/04, 5681/05 and 5684/05, 3 May 2011;Loizidou v. Turkey, (merits), 18 December 1996, Reports 1996 VI;Lordos and Others v. Turkey, no 15973/90, § 50, 2 November 2010;Niazi Kazali and Hakan Kazali v. Cyprus (dec.), no 49247/08, § 132, 6 March 2012;Öneryıldız v. Turkey, no 48939/99, § 124, ECHR 2004-XII;Orphanides v. Turkey, no 36705/97, § 39, 20 January 2009;Prokopovich v. Russia, no 58255/00, § 37, ECHR 2004-XI;Saveriades v. Turkey, no 16160/90, 22 September 2009;Solomonides v. Turkey, no 16161/90, § 31, 20 January 2009;Xenides-Arestis v. Turkey, no 46347/99, § 36, 22 December 2005
|
Resolutions No. 822 of 30 April (S/RES/822 (1993)), No. 853 of 29 July (S/RES/853 (1993)), No. 874 of 14 October (S/RES/874 (1993)), No. 884 of 12 November (S/RES/884 (1993)) of the United Nations (UN) Security Council;Human Rights Watch (HRW) report (“Seven Years of Conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh”, December 1994);Agreement on Military Co-operation between the Governments of the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Nagorno Karabakh;Resolution on “The Situation in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan” (A/RES/62/243) of the UN General Assembly adopted on 14 March 2008;European Parliament resolution of 18 April 2012 containing the European Parliament's recommendations to the Council, the Commission and the European External Action Service on the negotiations of the EU-Armenia Association Agreement (2011/2315(INI));Resolution 1416 of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, adopted on 25 January 2005;Report “Nagorno-Karabakh: Viewing the Conflict from the Ground” of the International Crisis Group (ICG) of 14 September 2005;Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua, judgment Nicaragua v. United States of America, Merits, Judgment, International Court of Justice, Reports 1986, p. 14, § 64;Resolution 1708 (2010) on “Solving property issues of refugees and displaced persons” of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe;Article 3 of the UN “Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons” (Commission on Human Rights, Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, 28 June 2005, E/CN.4/Sub.2/2005/17, Annex, (“Pinheiro Principles”)
|
Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Article 35-3 - Ratione loci);Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Positive obligations;Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Possessions);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for home;Respect for private life);Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy);Just satisfaction reserved (Article 41 - Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
22
|
1321605_22012014
|
Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (no. 13216/05)
|
2014-01-22 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"13216/05"
] |
001-179554
|
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179554
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212JUD001321605
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2017-12-12 00:00:00
| 2
|
[
"8",
"8-1",
"13",
"35",
"35-3-a",
"41",
"P1-1",
"P1-1-1"
] |
[
"ARM"
] |
Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 65, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV;Ališić and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 60642/08, ECHR 2014;Avcı and Others v. Turkey, no. 70417/01, § 56, 27 June 2006;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433/09, § 222, ECHR 2012;Cyprus v. Turkey (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 25781/94, § 56, ECHR 2014;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113/99 and 7 others, § 85, ECHR 2010;Doğan and Others v. Turkey (just satisfaction), nos. 8803/02 and 14 others, § 61, 13 July 2006;Ernestina Zullo v. Italy [GC], no. 64897/01, §§ 115-116 and 148-149, 29 March 2006;Ječius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 109, ECHR 2000-IX;Kovačić and Others v. Slovenia [GC], nos. 44574/98 and 2 others, §§ 255-256, 3 October 2008 Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113/99 and 7 others, § 85, ECHR 2010;Kurić and Others v. Slovenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 26828/06, ECHR 2014;Loizidou v. Turkey (Article 50), 28 July 1998, Reports 1998 IV;Malhous v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 33071/96, 12 July 2001;Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece (Article 50), 31 October 1995, § 34, Series A no. 330-B;Solomonides v. Turkey (just satisfaction), no. 16161/90, §§ 42-43 and 47, 27 July 2010;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064/90 and 8 others, § 224, ECHR 2009;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772/02, §§ 84-88, ECHR 2009
|
Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
FALSE
|
||
23
|
1325507_13062012
|
Georgia v. Russia (I) (no. 13255/07) Just satisfaction
|
2012-06-13 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"13255/07"
] |
001-145546
|
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (I)
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145546
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0703JUD001325507
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2014-07-03 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"3",
"5",
"5-1",
"5-1-f",
"5-4",
"8",
"8-1",
"13",
"13+3",
"13+5-1",
"19",
"35",
"35-1",
"38",
"41",
"P1-1",
"P1-1-1",
"P1-2",
"P4-4",
"P7-1",
"P7-1-1"
] |
[
"RUS"
] |
Circular no. 0215 of 30.09.2006 of the Main Directorate of Internal Affairs of St Petersburg and the Leningrad Region ; Circular no. 849 of 29 September 2006 of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation ; Articles 18.8, 18.10 and 18.11 of the Code of Administrative Offences
|
Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 69, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, § 127, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 V;Čonka v. Belgium, no 51564/99, ECHR 2002 I;Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no 25781/94, ECHR 2001 IV;Davydov and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 17674/02 and 39081/02, 1 July 2010;France, Norway, Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands v. Turkey, nos. 9940 9944/82, decision of the Commission of 6 December 1983, § 19, DR 35;Georgia v. Russia (I) (dec.), no 13255/07, §§ 44-46 and 50, 30 June 2009;Gusinskiy v. Russia, no 70276/01, § 73, ECHR 2004 IV;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no 27765/09, ECHR 2012;Idalov v. Russia [GC], no 5826/03, 22 May 2012;Ilaşcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no 48787/99, ECHR 2004 VII;Imakayeva v. Russia, no 7615/02, § 111, ECHR 2006 XIII (extracts);Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no 25;Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 55508/07 and 29520/09, ECHR 2013;Kalashnikov v. Russia, no 47095/99, ECHR 2002 VI;Khudoyorov v. Russia, no 6847/02, §§ 116 and seq., ECHR 2005 X (extracts);Lutsenko v. Ukraine, no 6492/11, § 105, 3 July 2012;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no 30696/09, §§ 227 and 255, ECHR 2011;Mathew v. the Netherlands, no 24919/03, § 156, ECHR 2005 IX;Mudayevy v. Russia, no 33105/05, § 127, 8 April 2010;NA. v. the United Kingdom, no 25904/07, §§ 119-120, 17 July 2008;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 147, ECHR 2005-VII;Niyazov v. Russia, no 27843/11, §§ 87 and seq., 16 October 2012;Nolan and K. v. Russia, no 2512/04, § 56, 12 February 2009;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no 37201/06, ECHR 2008;Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no 36378/02, 246 and 362, ECHR 2005 III;Solovyevy v. Russia, no 918/02, § 123, 24 April 2012;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760/06, § 168, ECHR 2012;Sufi and Elmi v. the United Kingdom, nos. 8319/07 and 11449/07, § 230, 28 June 2011;Sultani v. France, no 45223/05, ECHR 2007 IV (extracts);Tymoshenko v. Ukraine, no 49872/11, § 294, 30 April 2013
|
Report of the Monitoring Committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe – PACE Report;Information note of 1 November 2006 of the Federal Migration Service of the Russian Federation - HRW Report;Report of the International Federation for Human Rights - FIDH Report;Report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT) on the Russian Federation of December 2001;Report to the Russian Government on the CPT’s visit to the Russian Federation from 2 to 7 December 2001, § 32, CPT/Inf (2003) 30
|
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 38 - Examination of the case-{general} (Article 38 - Obligation to furnish all necessary facilities);Violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens-{general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+5-1 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5 - Right to liberty and security);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Prohibition of torture);No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 - Procedural safeguards relating to expulsion of aliens (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 7 - Expulsion of an alien;Lawfully resident);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Deprivation of property);No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to education-{general} (Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to education);Just satisfaction reserved
|
TRUE
|
24
|
1325507_13062012
|
Georgia v. Russia (I) (no. 13255/07) Just satisfaction
|
2012-06-13 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"13255/07"
] |
001-189019
|
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (I)
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-189019
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0131JUD001325507
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2019-01-31 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"33",
"41"
] |
[
"RUS"
] |
Ališić and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 60642/08, § 142, ECHR 2014;Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, § 142, 10 January 2012;Berdzenishvili and Others v. Russia, nos. 14594/07 and 6 others, 20 December 2016;Burmych and Others v. Ukraine (striking out) [GC], nos. 46852/13 et al., 12 October 2017;Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 13216/05, 12 December 2017;Cyprus v. Turkey (just satisfaction), [GC], no. 25781/94, ECHR 2014;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113/99 and 7 others, § 69, ECHR 2010;Georgia v. Russia (I) [GC], no. 13255/07, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom, nos. 60041/08 and 60054/08, § 97, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 94, 22 May 2012;Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 55508/07 and 29520/09, § 202, ECHR 2013;Lisnyy v. Ukraine and Russia, nos. 5355/15, 44913/15 and 50852/15, 5 July 2016;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 40167/06, 12 December 2017;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064/90 and 8 others, ECHR 2009
|
Articles 30 and 31 of the Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (2001) of the Commission of International Law (United Nations)
|
Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
|
25
|
1325507_13062012
|
Georgia v. Russia (I) (no. 13255/07) Just satisfaction
|
2012-06-13 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"13255/07"
] |
001-93425
|
GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (I)
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-93425
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0630DEC001325507
|
DECISIONS
| 2
|
[
"33",
"35",
"35-1"
] |
[
"RUS"
] |
Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, § 159, Series A no. 25;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 68, Reports of Judgments and Decisions, 1996-IV;Denmark v. Turkey (dec), no. 34382/97, 8 June 1999 Eur. Comm. H.R. Nos. 9940-9944/82, Dec. 6.12.83, DR 35, §§19, 21-22;No. 25781/94, Dec. 28.6.96, D.R. 86
|
Preliminary objections joined to merits;Admissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period
| ||||
26
|
1430517_18092019
|
Selahattin Demirtaş v. Turkey (no. 2) (no. 14305/17)
|
2019-09-18 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"14305/17"
] |
001-187961
|
CASE OF SELAHATTİN DEMİRTAŞ v. TURKEY (No. 2)
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187961
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1120JUD001430517
|
CHAMBER
|
2018-11-20 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"5",
"5-1",
"5-1-c",
"5-3",
"5-4",
"18",
"18+5-3",
"34",
"35",
"35-1",
"35-2-b",
"35-3-a",
"41",
"46",
"46-2",
"P1-3"
] |
[
"TUR"
] |
Articles 100 § 3 and 141 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (“the CCP”) ; Article 18 of the Constitution
|
Agit Demir v. Turkey, no 36475/10, § 39, 27 February 2018;Ali Rıza Kaplan v. Turkey, no 24597/08, §§ 19-23, 13 November 2014;Al-Jedda v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 27021/08, § 99, ECHR 2011;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no 71503/01, ECHR 2004 II;Azzolina and Others v. Italy, nos. 28923/09 and 67599/10, § 105, 26 October 2017;Balbay v. Turkey, (dec.), nos. 666/11 and 73745/11, § 69, 3 March 2015;Baranowski v. Poland, no 28358/95, § 52, ECHR 2000 III;Baumann v. France, no 33592/96, § 47, ECHR 2001 V (extracts);Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no 23755/07, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Cahit Demirel v. Turkey, no 18623/03, §§ 21 28, 7 July 2009;Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, § 42, Series A no 236;Ceviz v. Turkey, no 8140/08, §§ 41 44, 17 July 2012;Çiçek v. Turkey (dec.), no 72774/10, § 62, 3 March 2015;Clooth v. Belgium, 12 December 1991, § 44, Series A no 225;Contrada v. Italy, 24 August 1998, §§ 58 65, Reports 1998-V;Cordova v. Italy (no 1), no 40877/98, § 59, ECHR 2003-I;Creangă v. Romania [GC], no 29226/03, § 101, 23 February 2012;D.N. v. Switzerland [GC], no 27154/95, § 41, ECHR 2001 III;Del Río Prada v. Spain [GC], no 42750/09, ECHR 2013;Ersöz v. Turkey (dec.), no 45746/11, § 50, 17 February 2015;Etxeberria and Others v. Spain, nos. 35579/03 and 3 others, § 48, 30 June 2009;Fatullayev v. Azerbaijan, no 40984/07, § 172, 22 April 2010;Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. the United Kingdom, 30 August 1990, § 32, Series A no 182;Galip Doğru v. Turkey, no 36001/06, § 58, 28 April 2015;Gavril Yosifov v. Bulgaria, no 74012/01, § 40, 6 November 2008;Grosaru v. Romania, no 78039/01, § 47, ECHR 2010;Giorgi Nikolaishvili v. Georgia, no 37048/04, §§ 73 and 76, 13 January 2009;Gürdeniz v. Turkey, (dec.), no 59715/10, § 37, 18 March 2014;İbrahim Güler v. Turkey, no 1942/08, §§ 19-27, 15 October 2013;Idalov v. Russia [GC], no 5826/03, § 145, 22 May 2012;Ilaşcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no 48787/99, § 487, ECHR 2004-VII;Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no 15172/13, § 90, 22 May 2014;Ilıcak v. Turkey, no 15394/02, § 30, 5 April 2007;Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no 33977/96, 26 July 2001;Jėčius v. Lithuania, no 34578/97, § 50, ECHR 2000 IX;Karácsony and Others v. Hungary [GC], nos. 42461/13 and 44357/13, § 141, 17 May 2016;Karoussiotis v. Portugal, no 23205/08, § 57, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Kavakçı v. Turkey, no 71907/01, §§ 40-41, 5 April 2007;Koçintar v. Turkey (dec.), no 77429/12, §§ 30-46, 1 July 2014;Kolomenskiy v. Russia, no 27297/07, § 88, 13 December 2016;Korenjak v. Slovenia (dec.), no 463/03, § 73, 15 May 2007;Korkmaz and Others v. Turkey, no 35979/97, §§ 24-26, 21 March 2006;Kučera v. Slovakia, no 48666/99, § 94, 17 July 2007;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772/95, § 170, ECHR 2000 IV;Lamy v. Belgium, 30 March 1989, § 29, Series A no 151;Letellier v. France, 26 June 1991, Series A no 207;Lietzow v. Germany, no 24479/94, § 44, ECHR 2001 I;Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, §§ 41 and 42, Series A no 103;Lukanov v. Bulgaria, no 21915/93, decision of the Commission of 12 January 1995, Decisions and Reports (DR) 80-B, p. 108;Luković v. Serbia, no 43808/07, § 54, 26 March 2013;Lykourezos v. Greece, no 33554/03, § 56, ECHR 2006-VIII;M. v. Germany, no 19359/04, § 90, ECHR 2009;Maestri v. Italy [GC], no 39748/98, § 47, ECHR 2004 I;Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, 2 March 1987, Series A no 113;McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], nº 543/03, § 44, ECHR 2006 X;Megyeri v. Germany, 12 May 1992, § 22, Series A no 237 A;Mehmet Hasan Altan v. Turkey, no 13237/17, 20 March 2018;Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no 72508/13, § 222, 28 November 2017;Mergen and Others v. Turkey, nos. 44062/09 and 4 others, § 48, 31 May 2016;Metin v. Turkey (dec.), no 77479/11, § 57, 3 March 2015;Mooren v. Germany [GC], no 11364/03, 9 July 2009;Murray v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1994, Series A no 300 A;Mustafa Avci v. Turkey, no 39322/12, 23 May 2017;Năstase v. Romania (dec.), no 80563/12, § 109, 18 November 2014;Nedim Şener v. Turkey, no 38270/11, § 70, 8 July 2014;Neumeister v. Austria, 27 June 1968, p. 37, §§ 4-5, Series A no 8;Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no 31195/96, § 58, ECHR 1999 II;O’Hara v. the United Kingdom, no 37555/97, § 34, ECHR 2001 X;Oshurko v. Ukraine, no 33108/05, § 98, 8 September 2011;Ovsjannikov v. Estonia, no 1346/12, §§ 72-78, 20 February 2014;Paksas v. Lithuania [GC], no 34932/04, § 97, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Peraldi v. France (dec.), no 2096/05, 7 April 2009;Podkolzina v. Latvia, no 46726/99, § 33, ECHR 2002-II;Poyraz v. Turkey (dec.), no 21235/11, § 53, 17 February 2015;Rasul Jafarov v. Azerbaijan, no 69981/14, § 170, 17 March 2016;Reinprecht v. Austria, no 67175/01, § 39, ECHR 2005 XII;Riza and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 48555/10 and 48377/10, § 141, 13 October 2015;Roseiro Bento v. Portugal (dec.), no 29288/02, ECHR 2004-XII (extracts);Sadak and Others v. Turkey (no 2), nos. 25144/94 and 8 others, §§ 31- 33, ECHR 2002 IV;Şahin Alpay v. Turkey, no 16538/17, 20 March 2018;Schöps v. Germany, no 25116/94, § 44, ECHR 2001-I;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000 VIII;Şık v. Turkey, no 53413/11, § 62, 8 July 2014;Sılay v. Turkey, no 8691/02, § 27, 5 April 2007;Smatana v. the Czech Republic, no 18642/04, §§ 119-124, 27 September 2007;Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, §§ 60-63, ECHR 2003 IX (extracts);Sobacı v. Turkey, no 26733/02, § 27, 29 November 2007;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760/06, § 143, ECHR 2012;Stanka Mirković and Others v. Montenegro, nos. 33781/15 and 3 others, § 48, 7 March 2017;Stögmüller v. Austria, 10 November 1969, p. 40, § 4, Series A nº 9;Süleyman Erdem v. Turkey, no 49574/99, § 37, 19 September 2006;Tănase v. Moldova [GC], no 7/08, § 154, ECHR 2010;Uspaskich v. Lithuania, no 14737/08, 20 December 2016;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no 2) [GC], no 32772/02, § 85, ECHR 2009;Voisine v. France, no 27362/95, decision of the Commission of 14 January 1998;W. v. Switzerland, 26 January 1993, § 33, Series A no 254 A;Weeks v. the United Kingdom, 2 March 1987, § 40, Series A no 114;Wemhoff v. Germany, 27 June 1968, p. 25, §§12-15, Series A no 7;Whiteside v. Royaume Uni, no 20357/92, decision of the Commission of 7 March 1994;Włoch v. Poland, no 27785/95, § 108, ECHR 2000 XI;Yüksel and Others v. Turkey, nos. 55835/09 and 2 others, § 52, 31 May 2016;Ždanoka v. Latvia [GC], no 58278/00, § 115, ECHR 2006 IV;Žúbor v. Slovakia, no 7711/06, §§ 71 77, 6 December 2011
|
Memorandum by the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights following his visits to Turkey in 2016;Opinion of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) on the suspension of the second paragraph of Article 83 of the Constitution;Opinion on the amendments to the Constitution adopted by the Grand National Assembly on 21 January 2017 and submitted to a national referendum on 16 April 2017, adopted by the Venice Commission;Amnesty International Report 2017/2018: The state of the world’s human rights
|
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already submitted to another international procedure;Preliminary objection allowed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded;No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention;Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-{general} (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Free expression of the opinion of the people;Stand for election);Violation of Article 18+5-3 - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security;Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);No violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article 34 - Hinder the exercise of the right of application);Respondent State to take individual measures (Article 46-2 - Individual measures);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
27
|
1430517_18092019
|
Selahattin Demirtaş v. Turkey (no. 2) (no. 14305/17)
|
2019-09-18 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"14305/17"
] |
001-207173
|
CASE OF SELAHATTİN DEMİRTAŞ v. TURKEY (No. 2)
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207173
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1222JUD001430517
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2020-12-22 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"5",
"5-1",
"5-1-c",
"5-3",
"5-4",
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2",
"18",
"18+5",
"34",
"35",
"35-1",
"35-2-b",
"41",
"46",
"46-2",
"P1-3"
] |
[
"TUR"
] |
Articles 83, 85, 148 and Provisional Article 20 of the Constitution and its explanatory memorandum ; Articles 100 et seq., 141 § 1(a) and (d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure ; Articles 214 § 1, 314 §§ 1 and 2 of the Criminal Code
|
A. v. the United Kingdom, no 35373/97, § 79, 17 December 2002;A.M. v. France, no 12148/18, § 66, 29 April 2019;A.Ş. v. Turkey, no 58271/10, § 94, 13 September 2016;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 68, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, § 70, Reports 1996 VI;Aleksanyan v. Russia, no 46468/06, §§ 239-240, 22 December 2008;Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, nos. 68762/14 and 71200/14, § 152, 20 September 2018;Allan v. the United Kingdom, no 48539/99, § 43, ECHR 2002 IX;Alparslan Altan v. Turkey, no 12778/17, §§ 127-130 and 139, 16 April 2019;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no 71503/01, §§ 169 and 202-203, ECHR 2004 II;Baka v. Hungary [GC], no 20261/12, § 117, 23 June 2016;Borisenko v. Ukraine, no 25725/02, §§ 41 42, 12 January 2012;Bowman v. the United Kingdom, 19 February 1998, § 42, Reports 1998 I;Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no 23755/07, §§ 84-91 and 102, 5 July 2016;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no 4378/02, § 110, 10 March 2009;C.G.I.L. and Cofferati v. Italy, no 46967/07, § 71, 24 February 2009;Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, Series A no 236;Cebotari v. Moldova, no 35615/06, §§ 52 53, 13 November 2007;Celniku v. Greece, no 21449/04, § 40, 5 July 2007;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no 38433/09, §§ 140-142, ECHR 2012;Çiçek v. Turkey (dec.), no 72774/10, § 62, 3 March 2015;Cordova v. Italy (no 1), no 40877/98, § 59, ECHR 2003 I;Cordova v. Italy (no 2), no 45649/99, § 60, ECHR 2003 I (extracts);Cristea v. the Republic of Moldova, no 35098/12, § 25, 12 February 2019;Cüneyt Polat v. Turkey, no 32211/07, § 49, 13 November 2014;De Jorio v. Italy, no 73936/01, § 52, 3 June 2004;Decision on the competence of the Court to give an advisory opinion, § 31, ECHR 2004-VI;Del Río Prada v. Spain [GC], no 42750/09, §§ 138-139, ECHR 2013;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no 64569/09, §§ 120-122, ECHR 2015;Demir v. Turkey (dec.), no 51770/07, §§ 22-26, 16 October 2012;Dervishi v. Croatia, no 67341/10, §§ 124 125, 25 September 2012;Dolenec v. Croatia, no 25282/06, §§ 184-185, 26 November 2009;Etxeberria and Others v. Spain, nos. 35579/03 and 3 others, § 48, 30 June 2009;Fatullayev v. Azerbaijan, no 40984/07, §§ 176-177, 22 April 2010;Fédération hellénique des syndicats des employés du secteur bancaire v. Greece (dec.), no 72808/10, §§ 32-45, 6 December 2011;Féret v. Belgium, no 15615/07, § 65, 16 July 2009;Fernández Martínez v. Spain [GC], no 56030/07, § 117, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. the United Kingdom, 30 August 1990, §§ 32 and 34, Series A no 182;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978/05, §§ 115 and 164, ECHR 2010;Gavril Yosifov v. Bulgaria, no 74012/01, §§ 41 and 43, 6 November 2008;Gherghina v. Romania [GC] (dec.), no 42219/07, § 85, 9 July 2015;Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no 44158/98, § 65, ECHR 2004 I;Grosaru v. Romania, no 78039/01, § 47, ECHR 2010;Güler and Uğur v. Turkey, nos. 31706/10 and 33088/10, §§ 47, 50 and 52, 2 December 2014;Gürdeniz v. Turkey (dec.), no 59715/10, § 41, 18 March 2014;Ilaşcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no 48787/99, §§ 461 and 490, ECHR 2004-VII;Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan (infringement proceedings) [GC], no 15172/13, § 182, 29 May 2019;Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no 15172/13, 22 May 2014;Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary [GC], no 47287/15, §§ 167-178, 21 November 2019;Ilıcak v. Turkey, no 15394/02, § 30, 5 April 2007;Ilnseher v. Germany [GC], nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14, §§ 251-256, 4 December 2018;Jėčius v. Lithuania, no 34578/97, § 50, ECHR 2000 IX;Jerusalem v. Austria, no 26958/95, § 36, ECHR 2001 II;Kandjov v. Bulgaria, no 68294/01, § 57, 6 November 2008;Karácsony and Others v. Hungary [GC], nos. 42461/13 and 44357/13, 17 May 2016;Karoussiotis v. Portugal, no 23205/08, §§ 57-76, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Kart v. Turkey [GC], no 8917/05, §§ 42, 85 and 88, ECHR 2009 (extracts);Kavakçı v. Turkey, no 71907/01, §§ 40-41, 5 April 2007;Kavala v. Turkey, no 28749/18, 10 December 2019;Kolevi v. Bulgaria (dec.), no 1108/02, 4 December 2007;Korbely v. Hungary [GC], no 9174/02, § 72, ECHR 2008;Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no 37553/05, § 108, ECHR 2015;Kurić and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no 26828/06, § 259, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Letellier v. France, 26 June 1991, § 34, Series A no 207;Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, § 41, ECHR 2007 IV;Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, §§ 41 and 42, Series A no 103;Lukanov v. Bulgaria, no 21915/93, decision of the Commission of 12 January 1995, Decisions and Reports (DR) 80-B, p. 108;Lütfiye Zengin and Others v. Turkey, no 36443/06, 14 April 2015;Lykourezos v. Greece, no 33554/03, §§ 54-56, ECHR 2006 VIII;Maestri v. Italy [GC], no 39748/98, § 30, ECHR 2004 I;Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary [GC], no 18030/11, § 184, 8 November 2016;Magyar Kétfarkú Kutya Párt v. Hungary [GC], no 201/17, §§ 94-97, 20 January 2020;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, § 67, Series A no 82;Mammadli v. Azerbaijan, no 47145/14, §§ 52 and 104, 19 April 2018;Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, 2 March 1987, §§ 47 and 52, Series A no 113;Mehmet Hasan Altan v. Turkey, no 13237/17, 20 March 2018;Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no 72508/13, §§ 222-225 and 287-317, 28 November 2017;Mergen and Others v. Turkey, nos. 44062/09 and 4 others, § 48, 31 May 2016;Mikolenko v. Estonia (dec.), no 16944/03, 5 January 2006;Molla Sali v. Greece [GC], no 20452/14, §§ 89-91, 19 December 2018;Mooren v. Germany [GC], no 11364/03, § 72, 9 July 2009;Mugemangango v. Belgium [GC], no 310/15, § 67, 10 July 2020;Murray v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1994, § 55, Series A no 300-A;Murtazaliyeva v. Russia [GC], no 36658/05, § 88, 18 December 2018;Mustafa Avci v. Turkey, no 39322/12, § 60, 23 May 2017;Năstase v. Romania (dec.), no 80563/12, § 109, 18 November 2014;Navalnyy v. Russia [GC], nos. 29580/12 and 4 others, 15 November 2018;O’Hara v. the United Kingdom, no 37555/97, §§ 34-35, ECHR 2001 X;Olsson v. Sweden (no 1), 24 March 1988, § 61, Series A no 130;Otegi Mondragon v. Spain, no 2034/07, § 50, ECHR 2011;Paşa Bayraktar and Aydınkaya v. Turkey, no 38337/12, §§ 24-31, 16 May 2017;Pastörs v. Germany, no 55225/14, § 38, 3 October 2019;Patrono, Cascini and Stefanelli v. Italy, no 10180/04, § 61, 20 April 2006;Peraldi v. France (dec.), no 2096/05, 7 April 2009;Piotr Baranowski v. Poland, no 39742/05, §§ 45-46, 2 October 2007;Podkolzina v. Latvia, no 46726/99, § 33, ECHR 2002 II;Poyraz v. Turkey (dec.), no 21235/11, § 53, 17 February 2015;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 119, 20 March 2018;Rahmani and Dineva v. Bulgaria, no 20116/08, §§ 66 and 68, 10 May 2012;Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e Sá v. Portugal [GC], nos. 55391/13 and 2 others, § 109, 6 November 2018;Rasul Jafarov v. Azerbaijan, no 69981/14, § 162, 17 March 2016;Riza and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 48555/10 and 48377/10, § 141, 13 October 2015;Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no 47143/06, §§ 228 and 230, ECHR 2015;Rooman v. Belgium [GC], no 18052/11, § 123, 31 January 2019;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no 28341/95, § 52, ECHR 2000-V;S., V. and A. v. Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, § 73, 22 October 2018;Sadak and Others v. Turkey (no 2), nos. 25144/94 and 8 others, §§ 31 and 33, ECHR 2002 IV;Şahin Alpay v. Turkey, no 16538/17, 20 March 2018;Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland [GC], no 931/13, §§ 144-219, 27 June 2017;Scordino v. Italy (no 1) [GC], no 36813/97, §§ 179-180, ECHR 2006 V;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no 56581/00, § 46, ECHR 2006-II;Selmouni v. France [GC], no 25803/94, § 76, ECHR 1999 V;Sılay v. Turkey, no 8691/02, § 27, 5 April 2007;Sobacı v. Turkey, no 26733/02, § 26, 29 November 2007;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760/06, § 143, ECHR 2012;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, § 82, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Tănase v. Moldova [GC], no 7/08, §§ 105 and 154, ECHR 2010;Tomasi v. France, 27 August 1992, § 83, Series A no 241 A;Ulemek v. Croatia, no 21613/16, §§ 72-74, 31 October 2019;Uspaskich v. Lithuania, no 14737/08, § 94, 20 December 2016;Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381/09 and 32684/09, § 52, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Vedat Doğru v. Turkey, no 2469/10, § 37, 5 April 2016;Vučković and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153/11 and 29 others, § 74, 25 March 2014;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no 26083/94, § 54, ECHR 1999 I;Weeks v. the United Kingdom, 2 March 1987, § 40, Series A no 114;Wemhoff v. Germany, 27 June 1968, p. 23, § 9, Series A no 7;Włoch v. Poland, no 27785/95, §§ 108-109, ECHR 2000 XI;Yavuz and Yaylalı v. Turkey, no 12606/11, § 51, 17 December 2013;Yüksel and Others v. Turkey, nos. 55835/09 and 2 others, § 52, 31 May 2016;Ždanoka v. Latvia [GC], no 58278/00, §§ 102 and 115, ECHR 2006 IV;Zollmann v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 62902/00, ECHR 2003 XII
|
Opinion of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) on Articles 216, 299, 301 and 314 of the Turkish Criminal Code;Opinion of the Venice Commission on the suspension of the second paragraph of Article 83 of the Constitution;Memorandum by the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights following his visits to Turkey in 2016;Amnesty International 2017/18 report on the state of the world’s human rights
|
Preliminary objections dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;(Art. 35-1) Effective domestic remedy;(Art. 35-2-b) Matter already submitted to another international procedure;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Speediness of review);Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Right to free elections-{general} (Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 - Free expression of the opinion of the people;Stand for election);Violation of Article 18+5 - Limitation on use of restrictions on rights (Article 18 - Restrictions for unauthorised purposes) (Article 5 - Right to liberty and security;Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Respondent State to take individual measures (Article 46-2 - Individual measures)
|
TRUE
|
28
|
1537916_27012021
|
Abdi Ibrahim v. Norway (no. 15379/16)
|
2021-01-27 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"15379/16"
] |
001-167625
|
ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-167625
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
| 4
|
[
"8",
"8-1",
"9",
"9-1"
] |
[
"NOR"
] |
Communicated
| ||||||
29
|
1537916_27012021
|
Abdi Ibrahim v. Norway (no. 15379/16)
|
2021-01-27 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"15379/16"
] |
001-199382
|
CASE OF ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-199382
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1217JUD001537916
|
CHAMBER
|
2019-12-17 00:00:00
| 4
|
[
"8",
"8-1"
] |
[
"NOR"
] |
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)
|
FALSE
|
|||
30
|
1537916_27012021
|
Abdi Ibrahim v. Norway (no. 15379/16)
|
2021-01-27 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"15379/16"
] |
001-214433
|
CASE OF ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-214433
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1210JUD001537916
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2021-12-10 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"9",
"9-1",
"41"
] |
[
"NOR"
] |
Child Welfare Act of 17 July 1992
|
A.S. v. Norway, no. 60371/15, §§ 59-61, 17 December 2019;Cînța v. Romania, no. 3891/19, § 26, 18 February 2020;Folgerø and Others v. Norway [GC], no. 15472/02, §§ 54 and 100, ECHR 2007 III;Guðmundur Andri Ástráðsson v. Iceland [GC], no. 26374/18, § 311, 1 December 2020;Haddad v. Spain, no. 16572/17, § 79, 18 June 2019;Hernehult v. Norway, no. 14652/16, §§ 61-63, 10 March 2020;Ilnseher v. Germany [GC], nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14, § 100, 4 December 2018;İzzettin Doğan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, §§ 68 and 93, 26 April 2016;Johansen v. Norway (dec.), no. 12750/02, 10 October 2002;K.O. and V.M. v. Norway, no. 64808/16, §§ 59-60, 19 November 2019;Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen and Pedersen v. Denmark, 7 December 1976, § 52, Series A no. 23;Lautsi and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 30814/06, § 59, ECHR 2011 (extracts);M.L. v. Norway, no. 64639/16, §§ 77-81 and 98, 22 December 2020;Nagmetov v. Russia [GC], no. 35589/08, §§ 63 and 85, 30 March 2017;Navalnyy v. Russia [GC], nos. 29580/12 and 4 others, § 102, 15 November 2018;Olsson v. Sweden (no. 1), 24 March 1988, § 95, Series A no. 130;Omorefe v. Spain, no. 69339/16, § 70, 23 June 2020;Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955/06 and 3 others, §§ 53 et seq., ECHR 2011;Pedersen and Others v. Norway, no. 39710/15, §§ 60-62, 10 March 2020;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 126, 20 March 2018;Socialist Party and Others v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, § 41, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, § 48, ECHR 2005-X;Strand Lobben and Others v. Norway [GC], no. 37283/13, 10 September 2019;Tennenbaum v. Sweden (dec.) no. 16031/90, 3 May 1993;X v. the United Kingdom, no. 7626/76, 11 July 1977;Y.I. v. Russia, no. 68868/14, §§ 75-78, 25 February 2020;Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, § 57, Series A no. 44
|
Article 20(3) of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child adopted on 20 November 1989
|
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) read in the light of Article 9 - (Art. 9) Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion);Non-pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
31
|
1648312_22062016
|
Khlaifia and Others v. Italy (no. 16483/12)
|
2016-06-22 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"16483/12"
] |
001-157277
|
CASE OF KHLAIFIA AND OTHERS v. ITALY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-157277
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0901JUD001648312
|
CHAMBER
|
2015-09-01 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"3",
"5",
"5-1",
"5-1-f",
"5-2",
"5-4",
"13",
"13+3",
"13+P4-4",
"35",
"41",
"P4-4"
] |
[
"ITA"
] |
Articles 10 § 2 (b) and 14 of Legislative Decree no. 286 of 1998
|
A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 3455/05, §§ 162-163, ECHR 2009;Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey, no 30471/08, 22 September 2009;Adam and Others v. Germany (dec.), no 290/03, 1 September 2005;Allan v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 48539/99, 28 August 2001;Alver v. Estonia, no 64812/01, § 50, 8 November 2005;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III;Andrei Frolov v. Russia, no 205/02, §§ 47-49, 29 March 2007;Athary v. Turkey, no 50372/09, § 36, 11 December 2012;Babushkin v. Russia, no 67253/01, § 44, 18 October 2007;Baranowski v. Poland, no 28358/95, ECHR 2000-III;Belevitskiy v. Russia, no 72967/01, §§ 73-79, 1 March 2007;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V;Čonka v. Belgium, no 51564/99, §§ 61-63, ECHR 2002-I;Dbouba v. Turkey, no 15916/09, § 54, 13 July 2010;De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands, 22 May 1984, § 60, Series A no 77;De Souza Ribeiro v. France [GC], no 22689/07, § 82, ECHR 2012;Dhahbi v. Italy, no 17120/09, § 24, 8 April 2014;Dougoz v. Greece, nº 40907/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-II;E. v. Norway, 29 August 1990, § 50, Series A no 181-A;Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. the United Kingdom, 30 August 1990, § 40, Series A no 182;G.C. v. Italy, no 73869/10, § 36, 22 April 2014;Giulia Manzoni v. Italy, 1 July 1997, § 25, Reports 1997-IV;Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, §§ 92-93, Series A no 39;Herczegfalvy v. Austria, 24 September 1992, § 63, Series A no 244;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no 27765/09, § 183, ECHR 2012;Hutchison Reid v. the United Kingdom, no 50272/99, § 79, ECHR 2003-IV;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no 25;István Gábor Kovács v. Hungary, no 15707/10, § 26, 17 January 2012;Ječius v. Lithuania, no 34578/97, § 56, ECHR 2000-IX;Kadikis v. Latvia, no 62393/00, § 55, 4 May 2006;Kalashnikov v. Russia, no 47095/99, § 102, ECHR 2002-VI;Kantyrev v. Russia, no 37213/02, §§ 50-51, 21 June 2007;Karalevičius v. Lithuania, no 53254/99, § 39, 7 April 2005;Kehayov v. Bulgaria, no 41035/98, § 64, 18 January 2005;Khudoyorov v. Russia, no 6847/02, §§ 106-107, ECHR 2005-X (extracts);Kudła v. Poland [GC], no 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI;L.M. v. Slovenia, no 32863/05, § 121, 12 June 2014;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772/95, § 121, ECHR 2000-IV;M.S. v. Belgium, no 50012/08, § 122, 31 January 2012;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no 30696/09, § 388, ECHR 2011;Mahdid and Haddar v. Austria (dec.), no 74762/01, 8 December 2005;Moghaddas v. Turkey, no 46134/08, § 46, 15 February 2011;Moiseyev v. Russia, no 62936/00, 9 October 2008;Mooren v. Germany [GC], no 11364/03, § 76, 9 July 2009;Mouisel v. France, no 67263/01, § 37, ECHR 2002-IX;Musaev v. Turkey, no 72754/11, 21 October 2014;N.C. v. Italy [GC], no 24952/94, § 44, ECHR 2002-X;Nasrulloyev v. Russia, no 656/06, § 77, 11 October 2007;Naumenko v. Ukraine, no 42023/98, § 108, 10 February 2004;Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no 31195/96, § 69, ECHR 1999-II;Novoselov v. Russia, no 66460/01, §§ 32 and 40-43, 2 June 2005;Peers v. Greece, no 28524/95, §§ 68 and 74, ECHR 2001-III;Price v. the United Kingdom, no 33394/96, § 24, ECHR 2001-VII;Rahimi v. Greece, no 8687/08, § 60, 5 April 2011;Raninen v. Finland, 16 December 1997, § 55, Reports 1997-VIII;Riad and Idiab v. Belgium, nos. 29787/03 and 29810/03, § 100, 24 January 2008;Ruiz Rivera v. Switzerland, no 8300/06, § 47, 18 February 2014;S.D. v. Greece, no 53541/07, § 76, 11 June 2009;Saadi v. Italy [GC], no 37201/06, § 131, ECHR 2008;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 13229/03, § 43, ECHR 2008;Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no 36378/02, ECHR 2005 III;Shtukaturov v. Russia, no 44009/05, § 123, ECHR 2008;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 88, Series A no 161;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760/06, ECHR 2012;Sulejmanovic v. Italy, no 22635/03, § 43, 16 July 2009;Vachev v. Bulgaria, no 42987/98, § 71, ECHR 2004-VIII;Van der Leer v. the Netherlands, 21 February 1990, § 28, Series A no 170-A;Velinov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no 16880/08, § 49, 19 September 2013;Vlasov v. Russia, no 78146/01, § 84, 12 June 2008;Weeks v. the United Kingdom, 2 March 1987, § 61, Series A no 114;Witold Litwa v. Poland, no 26629/95, § 78, ECHR 2000-III
|
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-f - Expulsion);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-2 - Information on reasons for arrest;Prompt information);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens-{general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Prohibition of torture);Violation of Article 13+P4-4 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens-{general};Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
|
32
|
1648312_22062016
|
Khlaifia and Others v. Italy (no. 16483/12)
|
2016-06-22 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"16483/12"
] |
001-170054
|
CASE OF KHLAIFIA AND OTHERS v. ITALY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170054
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1215JUD001648312
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2016-12-15 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"3",
"5",
"5-1",
"5-1-f",
"5-2",
"5-4",
"13",
"13+3",
"13+P4-4",
"41",
"P4-4"
] |
[
"ITA"
] |
Article 10 § 4 of Legislative Decree no. 286 of 1998 providing “Consolidated text of provisions concerning immigration regulations and rules on the status of aliens” ; Article 13 of the Italian Constitution
|
A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 3455/05, §§ 162-163, ECHR 2009;A.A. v. Greece, no 12186/08, §§ 57-65, 22 July 2010;A.F. v. Greece, no 53709/11, §§ 71-80, 13 June 2013;Aarabi v. Greece, no 39766/09, §§ 42-51, 2 April 2015;Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey, no 30471/08, 22 September 2009;Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, § 61, Reports 1996 VI;Alver v. Estonia, no 64812/01, § 50, 8 November 2005;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III;Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 142-145, 10 January 2012;Andrei Frolov v. Russia, no 205/02, §§ 47-49, 29 March 2007;Andric v. Sweden (dec.), no 45917/99, 23 February 1999;B.M. v. Greece, no 53608/11, §§ 67-70, 19 December 2013;Babushkin v. Russia, no 67253/01, § 44, 18 October 2007;Baranowski v. Poland, no 28358/95, ECHR 2000-III;Belevitskiy v. Russia, no 72967/01, §§ 73-79, 1 March 2007;Berisha and Haljiti v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (dec.), no 18670/03, 16 June 2005;Blokhin v. Russia [GC], no 47152/06, §§ 164-172, ECHR 2016;Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no 23380/09, §§ 81-90, ECHR 2015;Brega v. Moldova, no 52100/08, 20 April 2010;Bubullima v. Greece, no 41533/08, § 27, 28 October 2010;C.D. and Others v. Greece, nos. 33441/10, 33468/10 and 33476/10, §§ 49-54, 19 December 2013;Căşuneanu v. Romania, no 22018/10, § 60-62, 16 April 2013;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V;Chamaïev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no 36378/02, ECHR 2005-III;Čonka v. Belgium, no 51564/99, ECHR 2002-I;D.L. v. Bulgaria, no 7472/14, §§ 6 and 69-71, 19 May 2016;Davydov v. Estonia (dec.), no 16387/03, 31 May 2005;Dbouba v. Turkey, no 15916/09, § 54, 13 July 2010;De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands, 22 May 1984, § 60, Series A no 77;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, 18 June 1971, §§ 67-70, Series A no 12;De Souza Ribeiro v. France [GC], no. 22689/07, ECHR 2012;Del Río Prada v. Spain [GC], no 42750/09, § 125, ECHR 2013;Delbec v. France, no 43125/98, § 33, 18 June 2002;Denisenko and Bogdanchikov v. Russia, no 3811/02, § 83, 12 February 2009;Dougoz v. Greece, nº 40907/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-II;Dritsas v. Italy (dec.), no 2344/02, 1 February 2011;E. v. Norway, 29 August 1990, Series A no 181-A;Efremidze v. Greece, no 33225/08, §§ 36-42, 21 June 2011;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no 39630/09, § 195, ECHR 2012;F.H. v. Greece, no. 78456/11, 31 July 2014;Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. the United Kingdom, 30 August 1990, § 40, Series A no 182;Fuchser v. Switzerland, no 55894/00, § 43, 13 July 2006;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978/05, §§ 87-92, ECHR 2010;Gavrilovici v. Moldova, no 25464/05, 15 December 2009;Georgia v. Russia (I) [GC], no 13255/07, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Ghulami v. France (dec.), no 45302/05, 7 April 2009;Giulia Manzoni v. Italy, 1 July 1997, § 25, Reports 1997-IV;Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, §§ 92-93, Series A no 39;Ha.A. v. Greece, no 58387/11, §§ 26-31, 21 April 2016;Herczegfalvy v. Austria, 24 September 1992, § 63, Series A no 244;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no 27765/09, ECHR 2012;Hutchison Reid v. the United Kingdom, no 50272/99, § 79, ECHR 2003-IV;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no 25;István Gábor Kovács v. Hungary, no 15707/10, § 26, 17 January 2012;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no 54810/00, § 67, ECHR 2006-IX;Ječius v. Lithuania, no 34578/97, § 56, ECHR 2000-IX;Kadikis v. Latvia, no 62393/00, § 55, 4 May 2006;Kalashnikov v. Russia, no 47095/99, § 102, ECHR 2002-VI;Kanagaratnam and Others v. Belgium, no 15297/09, § 80, 13 December 2011;Kantyrev v. Russia, no 37213/02, §§ 50-51, 21 June 2007;Karalevičius v. Lithuania, no 53254/99, § 39, 7 April 2005;Kehayov v. Bulgaria, no 41035/98, § 64, 18 January 2005;Khudoyorov v. Russia, no 6847/02, §§ 106-107, ECHR 2005-X (extracts);Koktysh v. Ukraine, no 43707/07, §§ 22 and 91-95, 10 December 2009;Kudła v. Poland [GC], no 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI;L.M. v. Slovenia, no 32863/05, 12 June 2014;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772/95, § 170, ECHR 2000-IV;Lavrentiadis v. Greece, no 29896/13, § 45, 22 September 2015;Luberti v. Italy, 23 February 1984, §§ 33-37, Series A no 75;M.A. v. Cyprus, no 41872/10, ECHR 2013;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no 30696/09, §§ 217-234, ECHR 2011;Mahdid and Haddar v. Austria (dec.), no 74762/01, 8 December 2005;Medvedyev and Others v. France [GC], no 3394/03, § 73, ECHR 2010;Mete and Others v. Turkey, no 294/08, § 112, 4 October 2012;Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, § 315, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Moisseiev v. Russia, no 62936/00, §§ 124-127, 9 October 2008;Mooren v. Germany [GC], no 11364/03, § 76, 9 July 2009;Mouisel v. France, no 67263/01, § 37, ECHR 2002-IX;Mubilanzila Mayeka and Kaniki Mitunga v. Belgium, no 13178/03, §§ 53-54, ECHR 2006-XI;Mursič v. Croatia [GC], no 7334/13, 20 October 2016;Musaev v. Turkey, no 72754/11, § 40, 21 October 2014;N.C. v. Italy [GC], no 24952/94, § 44, ECHR 2002-X;Naumenko v. Ukraine, no 42023/98, § 108, 10 February 2004;Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no 31195/96, § 69, ECHR 1999-II;Novoselov v. Russia, no 66460/01, §§ 32 and 40-43, 2 June 2005;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no 21722/11, § 219, ECHR 2013;Paladi v. Moldova [GC], no 39806/05, § 74, 10 March 2009;Peers v. Greece, no 28524/95, §§ 68 and 74, ECHR 2001 III;Popov v. France, nos. 39472/07 and 39474/07, 19 January 2012;Price v. the United Kingdom, no 33394/96, § 24, ECHR 2001-VII;R.U. v. Greece, no 2237/08, §§ 62-64, 7 June 2011;Rahimi v. Greece, no 8687/08, §§ 60-62, 5 April 2011;Ramirez Sanchez v. France [GC], no 59450/00, § 117, ECHR 2006-IX;Riad and Idiab v. Belgium, nos. 29787/03 and 29810/03, § 100, 24 January 2008;Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 34, Series A no 336;Rivas v. France, no 59584/00, § 38, 1 April 2004;Ruiz Rivera v. Switzerland, no 8300/06, § 47, 18 February 2014;S.D. v. Greece, no 53541/07, 11 June 2009;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 13229/03, § 43, ECHR 2008;Salman v. Turkey [GC], no 21986/93, §§ 99-100, ECHR 2000-VII;Selmouni v. France [GC], no 25803/94, ECHR 1999-V;Sharifi and Others v. Italy and Greece, no 16643/09, § 188, 21 October 2014;Shtukaturov v. Russia, no 44009/05, § 123, ECHR 2008;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760/06, ECHR 2012;Steel and Others v. the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998, § 54, Reports 1998-VII;Sulejmanovic v. Italy, no 22635/03, § 43, 16 July 2009;Sultani v. France, no 45223/05, ECHR 2007 IV;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, §§ 113-114, ECHR 2014 (extracts);T. and A. v. Turkey, no 47146/11, 21 October 2014;Tabesh v. Greece, no 8256/07, §§ 38-44, 26 November 2009;Tarakhel v. Switzerland [GC], no 29217/12, §§ 93-122, ECHR 2014;Tomasi v. France, 27 August 1992, § 110, Series A no 241-A;Torreggiani and Others v. Italy, nos. 43517/09, 46882/09, 55400/09, 57875/09, 61535/09, 35315/10 and 37818/10, §§ 68-69, 8 January 2013;Turan Çakır v. Belgium, no 44256/06, § 54, 10 March 2009;Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, § 32, Series A no 26;V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 24888/94, § 71, ECHR 1999 IX;Vachev v. Bulgaria, no 42987/98, § 71, ECHR 2004-VIII;Van der Leer v. the Netherlands, 21 February 1990, §§ 27-28, Series A no 170-A;Vasyukov v. Russia, no 2974/05, § 59, 5 April 2011;Velinov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no 16880/08, § 49, 19 September 2013;Vlasov v. Russia, no 78146/01, § 84, 12 June 2008;Weeks v. the United Kingdom, 2 March 1987, § 61, Series A no 114;Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, § 39, Series A no 33;Witold Litwa v. Poland, no 26629/95, § 60, ECHR 2000-III;Z. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 29392/95, § 73, ECHR 2001-V
|
Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 (the “Return Directive”) “on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals”;Bilateral agreement of 5 April 2011 between Italy and Tunisia;Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly (PACE) report “on the large-scale arrival of irregular migrants, asylum-seekers and refugees on Europe’s southern shores”, published on 30 September 2011;“Draft articles on the expulsion of aliens” adopted by the International Law Commission at its sixty-sixth session (2014), and of which the United Nations General Assembly took note by its Resolution A/RES/69/119 of 10 December 2014
|
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-f - Expulsion);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-2 - Information on reasons for arrest;Prompt information);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens-{general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Prohibition of torture);No violation of Article 13+P4-4 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens-{general};Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
33
|
1657408_04042012
|
Fabris v. France (no. 16574/08) Article 41 - Just satisfaction
|
2012-04-04 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"16574/08"
] |
001-105773
|
CASE OF FABRIS v. FRANCE
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105773
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0721JUD001657408
|
CHAMBER
|
2011-07-21 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"14",
"14+P1-1",
"P1-1",
"P1-1-1"
] |
[
"FRA"
] |
Articles 745, 757, 760 and 1075 -1077 of the Civil code ; Article 15 of Law no.2001-1135 of 3 December 2001 "on the rights of the surviving spouse and children born of adultery and modernising various provisions of the law of succession"
|
Alboize-Barthes and Alboize-Montezume v. France (dec.), no 44421/04, 21 October 2008;Blecic v. Croatia ([GC], no 59532/00, ECHR 2006-III;Brauer v. Germany, no 3545/04, 28 May 2009;De Diego Nafría v. Spain, no 46833/99, § 39, 14 March 2002;E.S. v. France (dec.), 10 February 2009, no 49714/06;Inze v. Austria, 28 October 1987, Series A no 126;Kopecký v. Slovakia (no 44912/98 [CG], § 38, ECHR 2004-IX);Larkos v. Cyprus [GC], no 29515/95, §§ 30-31, ECHR 1999-I;Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no 33071/96, ECHR 2000-XII;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, Series A no 31;Mazurek v. France, no 34406/97, ECHR 2000-II;Merger and Cros v. France, no 68864/01, 22 December 2004;Ostojic v. Croatia (dec.), no 16837/02, ECHR 2002-IX;Pla and Puncernau v. Andorra, no 69498/01, ECHR 2004-VIII;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, ECHR 2005-X
|
No violation of Art. 14+P1-1
|
TRUE
|
|
34
|
1657408_04042012
|
Fabris v. France (no. 16574/08) Article 41 - Just satisfaction
|
2012-04-04 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"16574/08"
] |
001-116716
|
CASE OF FABRIS v. FRANCE
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-116716
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0207JUD001657408
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2013-02-07 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"14",
"14+P1-1",
"41",
"46",
"46-1",
"46-2",
"P1-1",
"P1-1-1"
] |
[
"FRA"
] |
Section 25(2) of the 2001 Law ; Articles 1077-1 and 1077-2 of the Civil Code
|
Alboize-Barthes and Alboize-Montezume v. France (dec.), no 44421/04, 21 October 2008;Albu and Others v. Romania, no 34796/09 et seq., § 34, 10 May 2012;Ališic and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia and“the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” (dec.), no 60642/08, § 52, 17 October 2011;Andrejeva v. Latvia [GC], no 55707/00, ECHR 2009;Antoni v. the Czech Republic, no 18010/06, 25 November 2010;Association nationale des pupilles de la Nation v. France (dec.), no 22718/08, 6 October 2009;Beian v. Romania (no 1), no 30658/05, § 39, ECHR 2007-V (extracts);Beyeler v. Italy [GC], no 33202/96, § 100, ECHR 2000-I;Bozcaada Kimisis Teodoku Rum Ortodoks Kilisesi Vakfi v. Turkey, nos. 37639/03, 37655/03, 26736/04 and 42670/04, § 41, 3 March 2009;Brauer v. Germany, no 3545/04, 28 May 2009;Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no 28342/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-VII;Camp and Bourimi v. the Netherlands, no 28369/95, ECHR 2000-X;Compagnie des gaz de pétrole Primagaz v. France, no 29613/08, § 18, 21 December 2010;Depalle v. France [GC], no 34044/02, ECHR 2010;Di Marco v. Italy (merits), no 32521/05, § 50, 26 April 2011;E.S. v. France (dec.), no 49714/06, 10 February 2009;Inze v. Austria, 28 October 1987, Series A no 126;Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 18 December 1986, Series A no 112;Karaman v. Turkey, no 6489/03, § 30, 15 January 2008;Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no 30078/06, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Kopecký v. Slovakia [GC], no 44912/98, ECHR 2004-IX;Larkos v. Cyprus [GC], no 29515/95, §§ 30-31, ECHR 1999-I;Magnin v. France (dec.), no 26219/08, 10 May 2012;Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no 33071/96, ECHR 2000-XII;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, Series A no 31;Mazurek v. France, no 34406/97, 1 February 2000, ECHR 2000-II;Merger and Cros v. France, no 68864/01, 22 December 2004;Mork v. Germany, nos. 31047/04 and 43386/08, §§ 28 to 30 and 54, 9 June 2011;Nejdet Sahin and Perihan Sahin v. Turkey [GC], no 13279/05, §§ 56-57, 20 October 2011;Nerva and Others v. the United Kingdom, no 42295/98, § 43, ECHR 2002-VIII;Padovani v. Italy, 26 February 1993, § 24, Series A no 257-B;Petrovic v. Austria, 27 March 1998, § 22, Reports 1998-II;Pla and Puncernau v. Andorra, no 69498/01, ECHR 2004-VIII;Plalam S.P.A. v. Italy (merits), no 16021/02, § 37, 18 May 2010;Pressos Companía Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium, 20 November 1995, § 31, Series A no 332;Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no 42527/98, § 85, ECHR 2001-VIII;Saghinadze and Others v. Georgia, no 18768/05, § 103, 27 May 2010;Salah v. the Netherlands, no 8196/02, § 77, ECHR 2006-IX (extracts);Slivenko and Others v. Latvia (dec.) [GC], no 48321/99, § 121, ECHR 2002-II (extracts);Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, § 55, ECHR 2005-X;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, §§ 51 and 52, ECHR 2006-VI;Stretch v. the United Kingdom, no 44277/98, § 32, 24 June 2003;Taron v. Germany (dec.), no 53126/07, 29 May 2012;Van Raalte v. the Netherlands, 21 February 1997, § 33, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no 2) [GC], no 32772/02, § 61, ECHR 2009;Vermeire v. Belgium, 29 November 1991, Series A no 214-C;Wagner and J.M.W.L. v. Luxembourg, no 76240/01, § 96, 28 June 2007;Zarb Adami v. Malta, no 17209/02, § 42, ECHR 2006-VIII
|
Violation of Article 14+P1-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions;Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property);Just satisfaction reserved
|
TRUE
|
|
35
|
1657408_04042012
|
Fabris v. France (no. 16574/08) Article 41 - Just satisfaction
|
2012-04-04 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"16574/08"
] |
001-122353
|
CASE OF FABRIS v. FRANCE
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122353
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0628JUD001657408
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2013-06-28 00:00:00
| 2
|
[
"37",
"37-1-b",
"39"
] |
[
"FRA"
] |
Struck out of the list (Article 37-1-b - Matter resolved)
|
TRUE
|
|||
36
|
1715311_15052013
|
Vučković and Others v. Serbia (no. 17153/11)
|
2013-05-15 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"17153/11"
] |
001-112706
|
CASE OF VUČKOVIĆ AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-112706
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0828JUD001715311
|
CHAMBER
|
2012-08-28 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"14",
"14+P1-1",
"35",
"35-1",
"41",
"46",
"46-2",
"P1-1",
"P1-1-1"
] |
[
"SRB"
] |
Article 360 § 3 of the Obligations Act ; Memorandum of 16 March 2009
|
Adamsons v. Latvia, no. 3669/03, § 118, 24 June 2008;Atanasovski v. “the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”, no. 36815/03, § 38, 14 January 2010;Balogh v. Hungary, no. 47940/99, § 30, 20 July 2004;Beian v. Romania (no. 1), no. 30658/05, § …, ECHR 2007-V (extracts);Belgium” v. Belgium (Merits) (judgment of 23 July 1968, Series A no. 6, § 9);Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378/05, ECHR 2008-;Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184/05, § 66, ECHR 2010;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, § 175, ECHR 2007;Dalia v. France, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, pp. 87-88, § 38;Dankevich v. Ukraine, no. 40679/98, § 107, 29 April 2003;García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I;Iordan Iordanov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 23530/02, § 49-50, 2 July 2009;Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen and Pedersen v. Denmark, 7 December 1976, § 56, Series A no. 23;Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, § 15, ECHR 2002-VIII;Nejdet Sahin and Perihan Sahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 13279/05, 20 October 2011;Paduraru v. Romania, § 98, no. 63252/00, ECHR 2005-XII (extracts);Santos Pinto v. Portugal, no. 39005/04, § 41, 20 May 2008;Savez crkava “Rijec života” and Others v. Croatia, no. 7798/08, §§ 114 and 115, 9 December 2010;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII;Stefan and Stef v. Romania, nos. 24428/03 and 26977/03, §§ 33-36, 27 January 2009;Stefanica and Others v. Romania, no. 38155/02, § …, 2 November 2010;Tomic and Others v. Montenegro, nos. 18650/09 and others, § 57, 17 April 2012, not yet final;Tudor Tudor v. Romania, no. 21911/03, 24 March 2009;Unédic v. France, no. 20153/04, § 74, 18 December 2008;Vernillo v. France, judgment of 20 February 1991, Series A no. 198, pp. 11-12, § 27;Vincic and Others v. Serbia, nos. 44698/06 and others, 1 December 2009;Willis v. United Kingdom, no. 36042/97, § 36, ECHR 2002-IV
|
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 14+P1-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property;Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46-2 - Measures of a general character);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - claim dismissed
|
TRUE
|
|
37
|
1715311_15052013
|
Vučković and Others v. Serbia (no. 17153/11)
|
2013-05-15 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"17153/11"
] |
001-142199
|
CASE OF VUČKOVIĆ AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142199
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325JUD001715311
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2014-03-25 00:00:00
| 2
|
[
"35",
"35-1"
] |
[
"SRB"
] |
Sections 199, 200, 371 and 376 §§ 1-2 of the Obligations Act ; Rules on Travel and Other Expenses in the Yugoslav Army ; Articles 18, 21, 32 and 36 of the Constitution; Section 43 of the Prohibition of Discrimination Act
|
A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579/05, § 142, ECHR 2010;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports 1996 IV;Anđelković v. Serbia, no. 1401/08, § 24, 9 April 2013;Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, § 32, ECHR 2004 III;Balogh v. Hungary, no. 47940/99, § 30, 20 July 2004;Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378/05, § 42, ECHR 2008;Cardot v. France, 19 March 1991, § 34, Series A no. 200;Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, § 32, Series A no. 236;D v. Ireland (dec.), no. 26499/02, § 85, 28 June 2006;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, §§ 117 and 118, ECHR 2007 IV;Demopoulos and Others v. Turkey (dec.) [GC], nos. 46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04 and 21819/04, § 69, ECHR 2010;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 37, ECHR 1999 I;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, §§ 144 and 146, ECHR 2010;Hajnal v. Serbia, no. 36937/06, §§ 122 and 123, 19 June 2012;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, §§ 140-41, ECHR 2001-VII;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 107, 10 September 2010;Odièvre v. France [GC], no. 42326/98, § 22, ECHR 2003-III;Pérez de Rada Cavanilles v. Spain, 28 October 1998, § 43;Perna v. Italy [GC], no. 48898/99, §§ 23-24, ECHR 2003-V;Rakić and Others v. Serbia, no. 47460/07 and others, § 39, 5 October 2010;Ringeisen v. Austria, 16 July 1971, § 89, Series A no. 13;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 70, 17 September 2009;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 46, ECHR 2006 II;Thiermann and Others v. Norway (dec.), no. 18712/03, 8 March 2007;Van Oosterwijck, judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 40, pp. 16-17, §§ 33-34;Vinčić and Others v. Serbia, nos. 44698/06 and others, § 51, 1 December 2009;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, § 54, ECHR 1999 I
|
Preliminary objection allowed (Article 35-1 - Effective domestic remedy)
|
TRUE
|
|
38
|
1722411_31082016
|
Medžlis Islamske zajednice Brčko and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (no. 17224/11)
|
2016-08-31 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"17224/11"
] |
001-141569
|
MEDZLIS ISLAMSKE ZAJEDNICE BRCKO I DRUGI v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-141569
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
| 4
|
[
"10",
"10-1"
] |
[
"BIH"
] | |||||||
39
|
1722411_31082016
|
Medžlis Islamske zajednice Brčko and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (no. 17224/11)
|
2016-08-31 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"17224/11"
] |
001-157760
|
CASE OF MEDŽLIS ISLAMSKE ZAJEDNICE BRČKO AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-157760
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1013JUD001722411
|
CHAMBER
|
2015-10-13 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2"
] |
[
"BIH"
] |
Section 6 of the Defamation Act 2003
|
Busuioc v. Moldova, no. 61513/00, § 88, 21 December 2004;De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, no. 19983/92, § 47, 24 February 1997;Janowski v. Poland [GC], no. 25716/94, § 33, ECHR 1999 I;Jerusalem v. Austria, no. 26958/95, § 42, ECHR 2001 II;Kazakov v. Russia, no. 1758/02, 18 December 2008;Lešník v. Slovakia, no. 35640/97, § 53, ECHR 2003 IV;Mouvement raëlien suisse v. Switzerland [GC], no. 16354/06, § 48, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Savitchi v. Moldova, no. 11039/02, § 59, 11 October 2005;Siryk v. Ukraine, no. 6428/07, § 42, 31 March 2011;Sofranschi v. Moldova, no. 34690/05, §§ 28-32, 21 December 2010;Zakharov v. Russia, no. 14881/03, § 23, 5 October 2006
|
No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)
|
TRUE
|
|
40
|
1722411_31082016
|
Medžlis Islamske zajednice Brčko and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (no. 17224/11)
|
2016-08-31 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"17224/11"
] |
001-175180
|
CASE OF MEDŽLIS ISLAMSKE ZAJEDNICE BRČKO AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-175180
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0627JUD001722411
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2017-06-27 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"8",
"8-2",
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2"
] |
[
"BIH"
] |
Section 6 of the Defamation Act
|
A. v. Norway, no. 28070/06, 9 April 2009;Albert-Engelmann-Gesellschaft mbH v. Austria, no. 46389/99, § 30, 19 January 2006;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876/08, § 103, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Aurelian Oprea v. Romania, no. 12138/08, § 59, 19 January 2016;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, § 83, 7 February 2012;Bédat v. Switzerland [GC], no. 56925/08, § 48, ECHR 2016;Bergens Tidende and Others v. Norway, no. 26132/95, § 57, ECHR 2000 IV;Bezymyannyy v. Russia, no. 10941/03, § 41, 8 April 2010;Björk Eiðsdóttir v. Iceland, no. 46443/09, §§ 67-68, 10 July 2012;Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, §§ 63-66, ECHR 1999 III;Bucur and Toma v. Romania, no. 40238/02, § 93, 8 January 2013;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433/09, § 140, ECHR 2012;Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556/94, § 37, ECHR 1999 IV;Chauvy and Others v. France, no. 64915/01, § 78, ECHR 2004-VI;Couderc and Hachette Filipacchi Associés v. France [GC], no. 40454/07, §§ 90-93, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569/09, § 121, ECHR 2015;Dorota Kania v. Poland (no. 2), no. 44436/13, § 73, 4 October 2016;Erla Hlynsdόttir v. Iceland, no. 43380/10, § 65, 10 July 2012;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 54, ECHR 1999 I;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, 27 March 1996, § 39, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 II;Guja v. Moldova [GC], no. 14277/04, § 70, ECHR 2008;Heinisch v. Germany, no. 28274/08, § 64, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Janowski v. Poland [GC], no. 25716/94, ECHR 1999 I;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, §§ 140-41, ECHR 2001 VII;Karácsony and Others v. Hungary [GC], no. 42461/13, § 124, ECHR 2016 (extracts);Kazakov v. Russia, no. 1758/02, § 28, 18 December 2008;Korbely v. Hungary [GC], no. 9174/02, §§ 72-73, ECHR 2008;Lešník v. Slovakia, no. 35640/97, ECHR 2003 IV;Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 30, ECHR 2004-I;Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030/11, § 166, 8 November 2016;Morice v. France [GC], no. 29369/10, § 131, ECHR 2015;Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 10511/10, § 88, ECHR 2016;Nikowitz and Verlagsgruppe News GmbH v. Austria, no. 5266/03, §§ 25-26, 22 February 2007;Nikula v. Finland, no. 31611/96, §§ 44 and 46, ECHR 2002 II;Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC], no. 49017/99, § 87, ECHR 2004 XI;Pentikäinen v. Finland [GC], no. 11882/10, § 81, ECHR 2015;Perinçek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510/08, § 198, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Pfeifer v. Austria, no. 12556/03, §§ 47-48, 15 November 2007;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 52, ECHR 2000-V;Sanchez Cardenas v. Norway, no. 12148/03, §§ 37-39, 4 October 2007;Sidabras and Džiautas v. Lithuania, nos. 55480/00 and 59330/00, § 49, ECHR 2004 VIII;Siryk v. Ukraine, no. 6428/07, § 42, 31 March 2011;Sofranschi v. Moldova, no. 34690/05, § 29, 21 December 2010;Stankiewicz and Others v. Poland, no. 48723/07, § 61, 14 October 2014;Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, § 89, ECHR 2005 II;Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 64, ECHR 1999 IV;Tammer v. Estonia, no. 41205/98, § 69, ECHR 2001 I;Thoma v. Luxembourg, no. 38432/97, ECHR 2001 III;Thorgeir Thorgeirson v. Iceland, 25 June 1992, § 65, Series A no. 239;Tønsbergs Blad A.S. and Haukom v. Norway, no. 510/04, 1 March 2007;Verdens Gang and Aase v. Norway (dec.), no. 45710/99, ECHR 2001 X;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, §§ 104-113, ECHR 2012;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, § 54, ECHR 1999 I;White v. Sweden, no. 42435/02, § 25, 19 September 2006;Zakharov v. Russia, no. 14881/03, 5 October 2006
|
Code of Ethics and Conduct for NGOs, World Association of Non Governmental Organisations (WANGO), 2004
|
No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)
|
TRUE
|
41
|
1750207_08042015
|
Avotiņš v. Latvia (no. 17502/07)
|
2015-04-08 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"17502/07"
] |
001-141644
|
CASE OF AVOTIŅŠ v. LATVIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-141644
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0225JUD001750207
|
CHAMBER
|
2014-02-25 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"35",
"35-1",
"35-3-b"
] |
[
"LVA"
] |
Sections 637 and 644 of the Latvian Civil Procedure Law
|
Bosphorus Hava Yolları Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi v. Ireland [GC], no 45036/98, ECHR 2005 VI;Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no 62543/00, § 56, ECHR 2004 III;Grišankova and Grišankovs v. Latvia (dec.), no 36117/02, ECHR 2003 II;S.J. v. Luxembourg, no 34471/04, § 52, 4 March 2008;Joos v. Switzerland, no 43245/07, § 19, 15 November 2012;Liepājnieks v. Latvia (dec.), no 37586/06, § 73, 2 November 2010;McDonald v. France (dec.), no 18648/04, 29 April 2008;Michaud v. France, no 12323/11, § 100, ECHR 2012;Miholapa v. Latvia, no 61655/00, § 23, 31 May 2007;Orams v. Cyprus (dec.), no 27841/07, 10 June 2010;Övüş v. Turkey, no 42981/04, § 47, 13 October 2009;Pellegrini v. Italy, no 30882/96, §§ 40-41, 2001 VIII;Sancho Cruz and 14 other « Agrarian Reform » cases v. Portugal, nos. 8851/07, 8854/07, 8856/07, 8865/07, 10142/07, 10144/07, 24622/07, 32733/07, 32744/07, 41645/07, 19150/08, 22885/08, 22887/08, 26612/08 and 202/09, §§ 33-35, 18 January 2011;Savičs v. Latvia, no 17892/03, §§ 113-114, 27 November 2012;Shefer v. Russia (dec.), no 45175/04, §§ 24-25, 13 March 2012;Sholokhov v. Armenia and Moldova, no 40358/05, § 66, 31 July 2012
|
Articles 33-36, 38 et 54 of the Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and and commercial matters (“Brussels I Regulation”)
|
Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-3-b - No significant disadvantage);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Equality of arms)
|
TRUE
|
42
|
1750207_08042015
|
Avotiņš v. Latvia (no. 17502/07)
|
2015-04-08 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"17502/07"
] |
001-163114
|
CASE OF AVOTIŅŠ v. LATVIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163114
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0523JUD001750207
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2016-05-23 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"6",
"6-1"
] |
[
"LVA"
] |
Section 230(1) of the Latvian Civil Procedure Law
|
Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Bosphorus Hava Yolları Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi v. Ireland [GC], no. 45036/98, ECHR 2005 VI;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433/09, § 197, ECHR 2012;Dhahbi v. Italy, no. 17120/09, §§ 31-34, 8 April 2014;Drozd and Janousek v. France and Spain, 26 June 1992, § 110, Series A no. 240;García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I;Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no. 62543/00, § 56, ECHR 2004-III;Hussin v. Belgium (dec.), no. 70807/01, 6 May 2004;Jeunesse v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 12738/10, § 110, 3 October 2014;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696/09, § 338, ECHR 2011;McDonald v. France (dec.), no. 18648/04, 29 April 2008;Michaud v. France, no. 12323/11, ECHR 2012;Miholapa v. Latvia, no. 61655/00, § 23, 31 May 2007;Naydenov v. Bulgaria, no. 17353/03, § 50, 26 November 2009;Övüş v. Turkey, no. 42981/04, § 47, 13 October 2009;Pellegrini v. Italy, no. 30882/96, §§ 40-41, ECHR 2001 VIII;Povse v. Austria (dec.), no. 3890/11, 18 June 2013;Robba v. Germany, no. 20999/92, Commission decision of 28 February 1996;S.J. v. Luxembourg, no. 34471/04, § 52, 4 March 2008;Saccoccia v. Austria, no. 69917/01, §§ 60-62, 18 December 2008;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan [GC], no. 40167/06, § 115, ECHR 2015;Sholokhov v. Armenia and the Republic of Moldova, no. 40358/05, § 66, 31 July 2012;Société Guérin Automobiles v. the 15 States of the European Union (dec.), no. 51717/99, 4 July 2000;Ullens de Schooten and Rezabek v. Belgium, nos. 3989/07 and 38353/07, § 62, 20 September 2011;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, §§ 63 and 72, ECHR 1999 I;X v. Latvia [GC], no. 27853/09, §§ 98 and 107, ECHR 2013
|
Preamble, Articles 34(1) and 34(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (Brussels I Regulation);Article 6 (amended) of the Treaty on European Union;Article 52(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;Treaty of Lisbon;Dublin II Regulation;Articles 67(1), 81(1) and 82(1) of the TFEU
|
No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial;Equality of arms)
|
TRUE
|
43
|
1803011_04112015
|
Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary (no. 18030/11)
|
2015-11-04 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"18030/11"
] |
001-115547
|
MAGYAR HELSINKI BIZOTTSÁG v. HUNGARY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115547
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
|
2012-12-04 00:00:00
| 4
|
[
"10",
"10-1"
] |
[
"HUN"
] |
FALSE
|
|||||
44
|
1803011_04112015
|
Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary (no. 18030/11)
|
2015-11-04 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"18030/11"
] |
001-167828
|
CASE OF MAGYAR HELSINKI BIZOTTSÁG v. HUNGARY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-167828
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1108JUD001803011
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2016-11-08 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"8",
"8-1",
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2",
"35",
"35-3",
"41"
] |
[
"HUN"
] |
Section 19 (4) of the Data Act
|
A. Loersch and Nouvelle Association du Courrier v. Switzerland, nos. 23868/94 and 23869/94, Commission decision of 24 February 1995, DR 80, p. 162;Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763/97, § 55, ECHR 2001 XI;Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809/08, § 134, 21 June 2016;Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, § 65, ECHR 2000-II;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876/08, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, § 87, 7 February 2012;Bader v. Austria, no. 26633/95, Commission decision of 15 May 1996;Başkaya and Okçuoğlu v. Turkey [GC], nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94, §§ 61-67, ECHR 1999 IV;Bayatyan v. Armenia [GC], no. 23459/03, § 102 and §§ 108-10, ECHR 2011;Biao v. Denmark [GC], no. 38590/10, § 131, 24 May 2016;Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, ECHR 1999 III;Bosphorus Hava Yolları Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi v. Ireland [GC], no. 45036/98, § 150, ECHR 2005 VI;Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27238/95, § 70, ECHR 2001 I;Chauvy and Others v. France, no. 64915/01, § 68, ECHR 2004 VI;Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, ECHR 2002‑VI;Clavel v. Switzerland, no. 11854/85, Commission decision of 15 October 1987, DR 54, p. 153;Couderc and Hachette Filipacchi Associés v. France [GC], no. 40454/07, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Dammann v. Switzerland, no. 77551/01, § 52, 25 April 2006;De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, 24 February 1997, § 37, Reports 1997 I;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569/09, § 133, ECHR 2015;Eccleston v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 42841/02, 18 May 2004;Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 54, ECHR 1999 I;Gaskin v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, Series A no. 160;Gillberg v. Sweden [GC], no. 41723/06, 3 April 2012;Glass v. the United Kingdom, no. 61827/00, § 75, ECHR 2004‑II;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, 27 March 1996, § 39, Reports 1996 II;Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158/98, § 67, ECHR 2004 I;Grupo Interpres SA v. Spain, no. 32849/96, Commission decision of 7 April 1997, DR 89, p. 150;Guerra and Others v. Italy, 19 February 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Guseva v. Bulgaria, no. 6987/07, 17 February 2015;Hassan v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29750/09, §§ 77 and 102, ECHR 2014;Hertel v. Switzerland, 25 August 1998, § 46, Reports 1998‑VI;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, § 239, Series A no. 25;Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 18 December 1986, §§ 51 et seq., Series A no. 112;Jones v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 42639/04, 13 September 2005;Kenedi v. Hungary, no. 31475/05, 26 May 2009;Leander v Sweden, 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116;Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, § 48, ECHR 2007 IV;Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, §§ 38 and 41, Series A no. 103;Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom, 8 July 1986, §§ 114 and 117, Series A no. 102;Loiseau v. France (dec.), no. 46809/99, ECHR 2003-XII (extracts);Lustig-Prean and Beckett v. the United Kingdom, nos. 31417/96 and 32377/96, § 82, 27 September 1999;M.S. v. Sweden, 27 August 1997, § 47, Reports 1997 IV;Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, ECHR 2005 I;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31;Mouvement raëlien suisse v. Switzerland [GC], no. 16354/06, § 48, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 29, Series A no. 251 B;Nurminen and Others v. Finland, no. 27881/95, Commission decision of 26 February 1997;Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom, 26 November 1991, § 59, Series A no. 216;Öneryıldız v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, § 59, ECHR 2004‑XII;Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, § 184, ECHR 2009;Österreichische Vereinigung zur Erhaltung, Stärkung und Schaffung v. Austria, no. 39534/07, 28 November 2013;P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 44787/98, § 57, ECHR 2001 IX;Peck v. the United Kingdom, no. 44647/98, § 62, ECHR 2003 I;Perinçek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510/08, §§ 227-28, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 61, ECHR 2002‑III;Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, no. 25965/04, § 277, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Rekvényi v. Hungary [GC], no. 25390/94, § 35, ECHR 1999 III;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, § 172, ECHR 2005 X;Roşiianu v. Romania, no. 27329/06, 24 June 2014;S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 66, ECHR 2008;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13229/03, § 62, ECHR 2008;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, §§ 104 109, 17 September 2009;Sdruženi Jihočeské Matky v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 19101/03, 10 July 2006;Shapovalov v. Ukraine, no. 45835/05, 31 July 2012;Sigurður A. Sigurjónsson v. Iceland, 30 June 1993, § 35, Series A no. 264;Sinan Işık v. Turkey, no. 21924/05, §§ 42-53, ECHR 2010;Sîrbu and Others v. Moldova, nos. 73562/01, 73565/01, 73712/01, 73744/01, 73972/01 and 73973/01, §§ 17-19, 15 June 2004;Sixteen Austrian Communes and Some of Their Councillors v. Austria, nos. 5767/72 etc., Commission decision of 31 May 1974, Yearbook 1974, p. 338;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 46295/99, §§ 67-68, ECHR 2002-IV;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, §§ 47-48, ECHR 2005 X;Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, ECHR 2005 II;Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-IV;Társaság a Szabadságjogokért v. Hungary (no. 37374/05, § 14, April 2009;Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00, ECHR 2007‑II;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, § 106, ECHR 2012;Weber v. Germany (dec.), no. 70287/11, § 26, 6 January 2015;Witold Litwa v. Poland, no. 26629/95, §§ 57-59, ECHR 2000 III;X. v. Federal Republic of Germany, no. 8383/78, Commission decision of 3 October 1979, Decisions and Reports (DR) 17, p. 227;Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, §§ 51-52, Series A no. 44;Youth Initiative for Human Rights v. Serbia, no. 48135/06, 25 June 2013;Z v. Finland, 25 February 1997, §§ 96-97, Reports 1997 I
|
Articles 31 to 33 of the Vienna Convention of 23 May 1969 on the Law of Treaties;Article 19 of the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;Article 19 of the UN Universal Declaration;Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR);Article 42 of the European Union’s Charter of Fundamental Rights as well as Regulation (EC) No. 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001;Recommendation Rec (2002) 2 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe;Convention on Access to Official Documents of the Council of Europe;Declaration of Principles of Freedom of Expression in Africa, adopted by the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights in 2002;Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data of the Council of Europe of 28 January 1981
|
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione materiae);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom to impart information;Freedom to receive information);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
45
|
1805211_06062018
|
Rooman v. Belgium (no. 18052/11)
|
2018-06-06 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"18052/11"
] |
001-175846
|
CASE OF ROOMAN v. BELGIUM
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-175846
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0718JUD001805211
|
CHAMBER
|
2017-07-18 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"3",
"5",
"5-1",
"5-1-e",
"34",
"41"
] |
[
"BEL"
] |
Aerts v. Belgium, 30 July 1998, § 46, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 V;Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, Series A no 93;Bamouhammad v. Belgium, no 47687/13, §§ 115-123, 17 November 2015;Claes v. Belgium, no 43418/09, 10 January 2013;De Donder and De Clippel v. Belgium, no 8595/06, § 100, 6 December 2011;Dufoort v. Belgium, no 43653/09, §§ 76, 77 and 79, 10 January 2013;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978/05, § 115, ECHR 2010;Gelaude v. Belgium, no 43733/09, §§ 26-30, 9 January 2014;L.B. v. Belgium, no 22831/08, 2 October 2012;Lankester v. Belgium, no 22283/10, 9 January 2014;Moreels v. Belgium, no 43717/09, §§ 29-33, 9 January 2014;Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no 10511/10, ECHR 2016;Oukili v. Belgium, no 43663/09, §§ 29-33, 9 January 2014;Papillo v. Switzerland, no 43368/08, §§ 41-43, 27 January 2015;Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 13229/03, § 69, ECHR 2008;Saadouni v. Belgium, no 50658/09, §§ 37-41, 9 January 2014;Scordino v. Italy (no 1) [GC], no 36813/97, §§ 179-180, ECHR 2006 V;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no 36760/06, § 147, ECHR 2012;Swennen v. Belgium, no 53448/10, §§ 69 72, 10 January 2013;Tănase v. Moldova [GC], no 7/08, § 105, ECHR 2010;Torreggiani and Others v. Italy, nos. 43517/09 and 6 others, § 50, 8 January 2013;W.D. v. Belgium, no 73548/13, 6 September 2016;Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, § 51, Series A no 33;Y.Y. v. Turkey, no 14793/08, §§ 52-55, ECHR 2015 (extracts)
|
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
||
46
|
182806_02092015
|
G.I.E.M s.r.l v. Italy (no. 1828/06) , Hotel Promotion Bureau s.r.l. and Rita Sarda s.r.l. v. Italy (no. 34163/07) and Falgest s.r.l. and Gironda v. Italy (no. 19029/11)
|
2015-09-02 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"1828/06"
] |
001-156745
|
G.I.E.M. S.R.L. v. ITALY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-156745
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
| 4
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"7",
"13",
"P1-1"
] |
[
"ITA"
] |
Communicated
| ||||||
47
|
182806_02092015
|
G.I.E.M s.r.l v. Italy (no. 1828/06) , Hotel Promotion Bureau s.r.l. and Rita Sarda s.r.l. v. Italy (no. 34163/07) and Falgest s.r.l. and Gironda v. Italy (no. 19029/11)
|
2015-09-02 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"34163/07"
] |
001-156746
|
HOTEL PROMOTION BUREAU S.R.L. AND OTHERS v. ITALY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-156746
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0605DEC003416307
|
DECISIONS
| 4
|
[
"6",
"7",
"13",
"35",
"P1-1"
] |
[
"ITA"
] |
Partly inadmissible
| |||||
48
|
182806_02092015
|
G.I.E.M s.r.l v. Italy (no. 1828/06) , Hotel Promotion Bureau s.r.l. and Rita Sarda s.r.l. v. Italy (no. 34163/07) and Falgest s.r.l. and Gironda v. Italy (no. 19029/11)
|
2015-09-02 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"19029/11"
] |
001-157226
|
FALGEST S.R.L. AND GIRONDA v. ITALY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-157226
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0430DEC001902911
|
DECISIONS
| 4
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"6-2",
"7",
"13",
"35",
"P1-1",
"P7-2"
] |
[
"ITA"
] |
Partly inadmissible
| |||||
49
|
182806_02092015
|
G.I.E.M s.r.l v. Italy (no. 1828/06) , Hotel Promotion Bureau s.r.l. and Rita Sarda s.r.l. v. Italy (no. 34163/07) and Falgest s.r.l. and Gironda v. Italy (no. 19029/11)
|
2015-09-02 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"1828/06",
"34163/07",
"19029/11"
] |
001-184525
|
CASE OF G.I.E.M. S.R.L. AND OTHERS v. ITALY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-184525
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0628JUD000182806
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2018-06-28 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"6",
"6-2",
"7",
"7-1",
"35",
"35-1",
"35-3-a",
"41",
"P1-1",
"P1-1-1"
] |
[
"ITA"
] |
Law no. 47 of 28 February 1985 ; Sections 18, 19 and 20 of Law no. 47/1985, which became articles 30 and 44 of the Construction Code by Presidential Decree no. 380 of 6 June 2001 ; Article 4 § 4ter of Legislative Decree no. 78/2009 introduced by Law no. 102/2009 ; Articles 579 paragraph 3 and 676 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
|
A. Menarini Diagnostics S.r.l. v. Italy, no 43509/08, §§ 58-59, 27 September 2011;AGOSI v. the United Kingdom, 24 October 1986, § 55, Series A no 108;Allen v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 25424/09, 12 July 2013;Al Nashif v. Bulgaria, no 50963/99, § 123, 20 June 2002;Amuur v. France, 25 June 1996, § 50, Reports 1996-III;Anheuser-Busch Inv. v. Portugal [GC], no 73049/01, § 83, ECHR 2007 I;Baars v. the Netherlands, no 44320/98, §§ 25-32, 28 October 2003;Berland v. France, no 42875/10, § 42, 3 September 2015;Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi v. Ireland [GC], no 45036/98, § 149, ECHR 2005 VI;Bowler International Unit v. France, no 1946/06, § 67, 23 July 2009;Brosset-Triboulet and Others v. France [GC], no 34078/02, § 87, 29 March 2010;Bulena v. the Czech Republic, no 57567/00, § 37, 20 April 2004;Canády v. Slovakia, no 53371/99, § 31, 16 November 2004;Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no 49429/99, § 134, ECHR 2005 XII (extracts);Del Río Prada v. Spain [GC], no 42750/09, §§ 82-88, ECHR 2013;Depalle v. France [GC], no 34044/02, § 84, ECHR 2010;Didu v. Romania, no 34814/02, §§ 40-42, 14 April 2009;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no 39630/09, § 192, ECHR 2012;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, § 81, Series A no. 22;Ezeh and Connors v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39665/98 and 40086/98, § 123, ECHR 2003-X;Gáll v. Hungary, no 49570/11, § 63, 25 June 2013;Giavi v. Greece, no 25816/09, § 44, 3 October 2013;Giosakis v. Greece (no 3), no 5689/08, § 41, 3 May 2011;Grande Stevens and Others v. Italy, nos. 18640/10 and 4 others, 4 March 2014;Hammerton v. the United Kingdom, no 6287/10, § 84, 17 March 2016;Hentrich v. France, § 49, 22 September 1994, , Series A no 296 A;Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no 31107/96, §§ 55-58, ECHR 1999-II;J.A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd and J.A. Pye (Oxford) Land Ltd v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 44302/02, § 57, ECHR 2007 III;Jahn and Others v. Germany [GC], nos. 46720/99, 72203/01 and 72552/01, §§ 83-95, ECHR 2005-VI;James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, § 37, Series A no 98;Jamil v. France, 8 June 1995, §§ 30-31, Series A no 317 B;Janosevic v. Sweden, no 34619/97, § 68, ECHR 2002 VII;Jokela v. Finland, no 28856/95, § 45, ECHR 2002 IV;Kadubec v. Slovakia, 2 September 1998, § 57, Reports 1998-VI;Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no 21906/04, § 142, ECHR 2008;Klouvi v. France, no 30754/03, § 48, 30 June 2011;M. v. Germany, no 19359/04, ECHR 2009;Maggio and Others v. Italy, nos. 46286/09, 52851/08, 53727/08, 54486/08 and 56001/08, § 57, 31 May 2011;Mamidakis v. Greece, no 35533/04, § 33, 11 January 2007;Paksas v. Lithuania [GC], no 34932/04, § 75, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Paraponiaris v. Greece, no 42132/06, §§ 30-33, 25 September 2008;Salabiaku v. France, 7 October 1988, §§ 27-28, Series A no 141 A;Saliba v. Malta (dec.), no 4251/02, 23 November 2004;Sociedad Anónima del Ucieza v. Spain, no 38963/08, § 74, 4 November 2014;Société Oxygène Plus v. France (dec.), no 76959/11, § 47, 17 May 2016;Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine, no 48553/99, § 96, ECHR 2002 VII;Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, 23 September 1982, §§ 69-74, Series A no 52;Sud Fondi srl and Others v. Italy, no 75909/01, 20 January 2009;Sud Fondi srl and Others v. Italy (just satisfaction), no 75909/01, 10 May 2012;Sud Fondi srl and Others v. Italy (dec.), no 75909/01, 30 August 2007;Taliadorou and Stylianou v. Cyprus, nos. 39627/05 and 39631/05, §§ 27 and 56 59, 16 October 2008;Valico S.r.l v. Italy (dec.), no 70074/01, ECHR 2006-III;Varvara v. Italy, no. 17475/09, § 51, 29 October 2013;Vuckovic and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153/11 and 29 others, §§ 73-74, 25 March 2014;Welch v. the United Kingdom, 9 February 1995, § 27, Series A no 307-A;Yildirim v. Italy (dec.), no 38602/02, ECHR 2003-IV;Zafranas v. Greece, no 4056/08, § 36, 4 October 2011;Zollmann v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 62902/00, ECHR 2003 XII
|
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Abuse of the right of application;Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Nulla poena sine lege;Conviction;Criminal offence);No violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Nulla poena sine lege;Conviction;Criminal offence);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-2 - Presumption of innocence);Just satisfaction reserved (Article 41 - Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
|
50
|
187413_28112018
|
López Ribalda and Others v. Spain (no. 1874/13)
|
2018-11-28 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"1874/13"
] |
001-152959
|
LÓPEZ RIBALDA v. SPAIN and 1 other application
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-152959
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
| 4
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"8",
"8-1"
] |
[
"ESP"
] |
Communicated
| ||||||
51
|
187413_28112018
|
López Ribalda and Others v. Spain (no. 1874/13)
|
2018-11-28 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"1874/13"
] |
001-179881
|
CASE OF LÓPEZ RIBALDA AND OTHERS v. SPAIN
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179881
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0109JUD000187413
|
CHAMBER
|
2018-01-09 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"8",
"8-1",
"35",
"41"
] |
[
"ESP"
] |
Article 20.3 of the Labour Regulations (Estatuto de los Trabadores) approved by Royal Legislative Decree no. 1/1995 ; Section 5 of the Data Protection Act ; Article 3 of Instruction no. 1/2006 issued by the Spanish Data Protection Agency
|
Allan v. the United Kingdom, no. 48539/99, §§ 42 and 43, 5 November 2002;Bărbulescu v. Romania [GC], no. 61496/08, ECHR 2017 (extracts);Benediktsdóttir v. Iceland (dec.), no. 38079/06, 16 June 2009;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, §§ 88-98, 10 March 2009;García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999 I;Halford v. the United Kingdom, 25 June 1997, § 45, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 III;I. v. Finland, no. 20511/03, §§ 35-36, 17 July 2008;J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 48839/09, §§ 77-79, 20 December 2011;K.U. v. Finland, no. 2872/02, §§ 42-43, ECHR 2008;Kemmache v. France (no. 3), 24 November 1994, § 44, Series A no. 296 C;Khan v. the United Kingdom, no. 35394/97, § 34, ECHR 2000 V;P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 44787/98, ECHR 2001 IX;Peck v. the United Kingdom, no. 44647/98, §§ 58-59, ECHR 2003 I;Perry v. the United Kingdom, no. 63737/00, §§ 36-38, ECHR 2003 IX (extracts);Reklos and Davourlis v. Greece, no. 1234/05, § 40, 15 January 2009;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, §§ 43-44, ECHR 2000 V;Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, Series A no. 140, p. 29, §§ 45-48;Schüssel v. Austria (dec.), no. 42409/98, 21 February 2002;Söderman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786/08, §§ 78-79, ECHR 2013;Van Mechelen and Others v. the Netherlands, 23 April 1997, § 50, Reports 1997 III;Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00, § 50, ECHR 2004 VI
|
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
|
52
|
187413_28112018
|
López Ribalda and Others v. Spain (no. 1874/13)
|
2018-11-28 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"1874/13"
] |
001-197098
|
CASE OF LÓPEZ RIBALDA AND OTHERS v. SPAIN
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-197098
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1017JUD000187413
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2019-10-17 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"8",
"8-1",
"35",
"35-1"
] |
[
"ESP"
] |
Section 5 of the Personal Data Protection Act ; Instruction no. 1/2006 of 8 November 2006 ; Article 20.3 of the Labour Regulations (Estatuto de los Trabajadores) approved by Royal Legislative Decree no. 1/1995
|
Allan v. the United Kingdom, no 48539/99, § 35, ECHR 2002 IX;Angelov v. Bulgaria, no 44076/98, § 28, 22 April 2004;Antović and Mirković v. Montenegro, no 70838/13, §§ 42-45, 28 November 2017;Bărbulescu v. Romania [GC], no 61496/08, 5 September 2017;Bochan v. Ukraine (no 2) [GC], no 22251/08, § 61, ECHR 2015;Carmel Saliba v. Malta, no 24221/13, § 67, 29 November 2016;De La Flor Cabrera v. Spain, no 10764/09, § 31, 27 May 2014;Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no 76639/11, §§ 95 and 100, 25 September 2018;Fernández Martínez v. Spain [GC], no 56030/07, § 110, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978/05, § 163, ECHR 2010;Herbecq and the Association "Ligue des droits de l’homme" v. Belgium, nos. 32200/96 and 32201/96, decision of the Commission of 14 January 1998, Decisions and Reports 92-A, p. 92;Ilnseher v. Germany [GC], nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14, § 100, 4 December 2018;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no 25702/94, §§ 140-141, ECHR 2001 VII;Köpke v. Germany (dec.), no 420/07, 5 October 2010;M.C. v. Bulgaria, no 39272/98, § 150, ECHR 2003 XII;Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.) [GC], no 33071/96, ECHR 2000-XII;Navalnyy v. Russia [GC], nos. 29580/12 and 4 others, § 61, 15 November 2018;Nicola v. Turkey, no 18404/91, § 15, 27 January 2009;P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no 44787/98, ECHR 2001 IX;Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955/06 and 3 others, § 62, ECHR 2011;Peck v. the United Kingdom, no 44647/98, §§ 58-63, ECHR 2003 I;Perry v. the United Kingdom, no 63737/00, §§ 36-43, ECHR 2003 IX (extracts);Reklos and Davourlis v. Greece, no 1234/05, §§ 34-43, 15 January 2009;Schenk v. Switzerland, 12 July 1988, §§ 46-48, Series A no 140;Schüssel v. Austria (dec.), no 42409/98, 21 February 2002;Schüth v. Germany, no 1620/03, §§ 54 and 57, ECHR 2010;Söderman v. Sweden [GC], no 5786/08, § 78, ECHR 2013;Von Hannover v. Germany (no 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, §§ 95 and 98, ECHR 2012;Vukota-Bojić v. Switzerland, no 61838/10, §§ 55-59, 18 October 2016;X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, §§ 23, 24 and 27, Series A no 91
|
Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data
|
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)
|
TRUE
|
53
|
1901007_03102012
|
X. and Others v. Austria (no. 19010/07)
|
2012-10-03 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"19010/07"
] |
001-112158
|
X AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-112158
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
|
2009-01-29 00:00:00
| 4
|
[
"8",
"8-1",
"14"
] |
[
"AUT"
] |
Communicated
|
FALSE
|
||||
54
|
1901007_03102012
|
X. and Others v. Austria (no. 19010/07)
|
2012-10-03 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"19010/07"
] |
001-116735
|
CASE OF X AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-116735
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0219JUD001901007
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2013-02-19 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"8",
"8-1",
"14",
"14+8",
"41"
] |
[
"AUT"
] |
Articles 179 § 2, 180a , 181 § 1, sub-paragraph 2, 181 § 3 and 182 § 2 of the Civil Code ; Article 8 § 4 of the Registered Partnership Act
|
A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579/05, § 232, ECHR 2010;Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498/08, § 128, ECHR 2010 (extracts);Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378/05, § 60, ECHR 2008;Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 78, ECHR 2002-VI;Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45;E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546/02, 22 January 2008;Emonet and Others v. Switzerland, no. 39051/03, 13 December 2007;Eski v. Austria, no. 21949/03, 25 January 2007;Fretté v. France, no. 36515/97, ECHR 2002-I;Gas and Dubois v. France, no. 25951/07, 15 March 2012;Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) [GC], no. 74025/01, § 72, ECHR 2005-IX;Karner v. Austria, no. 40016/98, ECHR 2003-IX;Kozak v. Poland, no. 13102/02, 2 March 2010;L. and V. v. Austria, nos. 39392/98 and 39829/98, ECHR 2003-I;Modinos v. Cyprus, 22 April 1993, Series A no. 259;Norris v. Ireland, 26 October 1988, Series A no. 142;P.B. and J.S. v. Austria, no. 18984/02, 22 July 2010;Petrovic v. Austria, 27 March 1998, § 22, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II;S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 57813/00, § 94, ECHR 2011;Salgueiro da Silva Mouta v. Portugal, no. 33290/96, ECHR 1999-IX;Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no. 30141/04, ECHR 2010;Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 33985/96 and 33986/96, ECHR 1999-VI;Sporer v. Austria, no. 35637/03, §§ 88-90, 3 February 2011;Wagner and J.M.W.L. v. Luxembourg, no. 76240/01, § 119, 28 June 2007;Zaunegger v. Germany, no. 22028/04, §§ 61-63, 3 December 2009
|
Article 7 §§ 1 and 2 of the 2008 European Convention on the Adoption of Children;Recommendation CM/Rec(2010)5 adopted on 31 March 2010 by the Committee of Ministers
|
No violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Non-pecuniary damage - award
|
TRUE
|
55
|
1986712_01062016
|
Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (No. 2) (no. 19867/12)
|
2016-06-01 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"19867/12"
] |
001-175646
|
CASE OF MOREIRA FERREIRA v. PORTUGAL (No. 2)
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-175646
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0711JUD001986712
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2017-07-11 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"35",
"35-3-a",
"46",
"46-1",
"46-2"
] |
[
"PRT"
] |
Articles 449 (1) (g) and 457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
|
Anđelković v. Serbia, no. 1401/08, § 24, 9 April 2013;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, §§ 202 and 203, ECHR 2004 II;Bochan v. Ukraine (no 2) [GC], no 22251/08, ECHR 2015;Bota v. Romania, no. 16382/03, §§ 33 and 34, 4 November 2008;Bujniţa v. Moldova, no. 36492/02, § 20, 16 January 2007;Davydov v. Russia, no. 18967/07, § 29, 30 October 2014;Del Río Prada v. Spain [GC], no. 42750/09, §§ 138 and 139, ECHR 2013;Dulaurans v. France, no. 34553/97, §§ 33-34 and 38, 21 March 2000;Egmez v. Cyprus, (dec.), no. 12214/07, 18 September 2012;Emre v. Switzerland (no. 2), no. 5056/10, 11 October 2011;Fischer v. Austria (dec.), no. 27569/02, ECHR 2003-VI;García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 26, ECHR 1999 I;Giuran v. Romania, no. 24360/04, § 39, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Henryk Urban and Ryszard Urban v. Poland, no. 23614/08, § 66, 30 November 2010;Higgins and Others v. France, 19 February 1998, §§ 42-43, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 I;Jeronovičs v. Latvia [GC], no. 44898/10, § 118, ECHR 2016;Khamidov v. Russia, no. 72118/01, § 170, 15 November 2007;Lenskaya v. Russia, no. 28730/03, §§ 39 and 40, 29 January 2009;Lhermitte v. Belgium [GC], no. 34238/09, §§ 66 and 67, ECHR 2016;Lyons and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 15227/03, ECHR 2003-IX;Maresti v. Croatia, no. 55759/07, §§ 25 and 28, 25 June 2009;Meftah and Others v. France [GC], nos. 32911/96, 35237/97 and 34595/97, § 40, ECHR 2002 VII;Monnell and Morris v. the United Kingdom, 2 March 1987, § 54, Series A no. 115;Nikitin v. Russia, no. 50178/99, §§ 55-57, ECHR 2004 VIII;Öcalan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 5980/07, 6 July 2010;Öcalan v. Turkey, [GC], no. 46221/99, § 210, ECHR 2005 IV;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358/12, § 210, ECHR 2017;Pavlović and Others v. Croatia, no. 13274/11, § 49, 2 April 2015;Radchikov v. Russia, no. 65582/01, § 48, 24 May 2007;Ruiz Torija v. Spain, 9 December 1994, §§ 29-30, Series A no. 303 A;Savinskiy v. Ukraine, no. 6965/02, § 25, 28 February 2006;Sejdovic v. Italy, [GC], no. 56581/00, ECHR 2006 II;Ştefan v. Romania, no. 28319/03, § 18, 6 April 2010;Tsanova-Gecheva v. Bulgaria, no. 43800/12, § 91, 15 September 2015;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no 2) ([GC], no 32772/02, ECHR 2009;Yaremenko v. Ukraine (no. 2), no. 66338/09, 30 April 2015
|
Recommendation No. (2000) 2 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on re-examination or reopening of certain cases at domestic level following judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
|
Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-3-a - Ratione materiae);Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3-a - Ratione materiae);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Criminal charge;Fair hearing)
|
TRUE
|
56
|
20117_21112018
|
Magyar Kétfarkú Kutya Párt v. Hungary (no. 201/17)
|
2018-11-21 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"201/17"
] |
001-170894
|
MAGYAR KÉTFARKÚ KUTYA PÁRT v. HUNGARY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170894
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
| 4
|
[
"10",
"10-1"
] |
[
"HUN"
] |
Communicated
| ||||||
57
|
20117_21112018
|
Magyar Kétfarkú Kutya Párt v. Hungary (no. 201/17)
|
2018-11-21 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"201/17"
] |
001-180310
|
CASE OF MAGYAR KÉTFARKÚ KUTYA PÁRT v. HUNGARY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-180310
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0123JUD000020117
|
CHAMBER
|
2018-01-23 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2",
"35",
"35-1",
"41"
] |
[
"HUN"
] |
Article IX (1) of the Fundamental Law ; Section 2(1), (a) and (e) of Act XXXVI of 2013 on Electoral Procedure
|
Chiragov and Others v. Armenia [GC], no. 13216/05, § 116, ECHR 2015;Džinić v. Croatia, no. 38359/13, § 49, 17 May 2016;Erményi v. Hungary, no. 22254/14, § 38, 22 November 2016;Guseva v. Bulgaria, no. 6987/07, § 36, 17 February 2015;Neij and Sunde Kolmisoppi v. Sweden (dec.), no. 40397/12, 20 June 2012;Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom, 26 November 1991, § 59(b), Series A no. 216;Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, § 49, ECHR 1999-VI;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358/12, § 169, ECHR 2017;S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, §§ 113-114, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria, nos. 29221/95 and 29225/95, § 84, ECHR 2001 IX;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, § 103, ECHR 2012
|
Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression;Freedom to impart information;Freedom to receive information);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
FALSE
|
|
58
|
20117_21112018
|
Magyar Kétfarkú Kutya Párt v. Hungary (no. 201/17)
|
2018-11-21 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"201/17"
] |
001-200657
|
CASE OF MAGYAR KÉTFARKÚ KUTYA PÁRT v. HUNGARY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-200657
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0120JUD000020117
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2020-01-20 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2",
"41"
] |
[
"HUN"
] |
Section 2(1), 2(1)a, 2(1)(e), 141, 218 and 218(2)(d) of the Act XXXVI of 2013 on Electoral Procedure (EPA) ; Article 2(1) of the Fundamental Law
|
Ahmet Yıldırım v. Turkey, no. 3111/10, §§ 49-50, ECHR 2012;Association Ekin v. France, no. 39288/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-VIII;Bédat v. Switzerland [GC], no. 56925/08, § 58, 29 March 2016;Cengiz and Others v. Turkey, nos. 48226/10 and 14027/11, § 54, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433/09, § 141, ECHR 2012;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569/09, §§ 120-122, ECHR 2015;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 144, ECHR 2010;Gillow v. the United Kingdom, 24 November 1986, § 51, Series A no. 109;Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158/98, § 65, ECHR 2004 I;Ivinović v. Croatia, no. 13006/13, § 28, 18 September 2014;Jalloh v. Germany (dec.), no. 54810/00, 26 October 2004;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, § 31, Series A no. 298;Kovach v. Ukraine, no. 39424/02, §§ 48-62, ECHR 2008;Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, § 115, ECHR 2015;Lykourezos v. Greece, no. 33554/03, §§ 50-58, ECHR 2006 VIII;Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030/11, 8 November 2016;Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, § 67, Series A no. 82;McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 107, 10 September 2010;Neij and Sunde Kolmisoppi v. Sweden (dec.), no. 40397/12, 19 February 2013;O’Keeffe v. Ireland [GC], no. 35810/09, § 199, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Olsson v. Sweden (no. 1), 24 March 1988, § 61, Series A no. 130;Orlovskaya Iskra v. Russia, no. 42911/08, § 110, 21 February 2017;Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, § 49, ECHR 1999 VI;Parrillo v. Italy [GC], no. 46470/11, § 87, ECHR 2015;Paschalidis, Koutmeridis and Zaharakis v. Greece, nos. 27863/05 and 2 others, §§ 29-35, 10 April 2008;Perinçek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510/08, § 136, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Refah Partisi (the Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 41340/98 and 3 others, §§ 87-88 and 100, ECHR 2003 II;Schwarzenberger v. Germany, no. 75737/01, § 31, 10 August 2006;Storck v. Germany (dec.), no. 61603/00, 26 October 2004;Társaság a Szabadságjogokért v. Hungary, no. 37374/05, 14 April 2009;Uhl v. Germany (dec.), no. 64387/01, 6 May 2004;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, § 103, ECHR 2012;Vučković and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153/11 and 29 others, §§ 69-77, 25 March 2014
|
Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression;Freedom to impart information;Freedom to receive ideas);Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
|
59
|
2026112_17062015
|
Baka v. Hungary (no. 20261/12)
|
2015-06-17 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"20261/12"
] |
001-115532
|
BAKA v. HUNGARY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115532
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
|
2012-11-29 00:00:00
| 4
|
[
"10"
] |
[
"HUN"
] |
FALSE
|
|||||
60
|
2026112_17062015
|
Baka v. Hungary (no. 20261/12)
|
2015-06-17 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"20261/12"
] |
001-144139
|
CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-144139
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527JUD002026112
|
CHAMBER
|
2014-05-27 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2",
"35",
"35-3",
"41"
] |
[
"HUN"
] |
Section 74/A(2) of the Organisation and Administration of the Courts Act (Act LXVI of 1997) ; Section 11(2) of the Transitional Provisions of the Fundamental Law of Hungary ; Organisation and Administration of the Courts Bill (no. T/4743)
|
Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal [GC], no. 73049/01, § 64, ECHR 2007 I;Apay v. Turkey (dec.), no. 3964/05, 11 December 2007;Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 May 1985, § 57, Series A no. 93;Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131;Dzhidzheva-Trendafilova v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 12628/09, §§ 42-50, 9 October 2012;Efendiyeva v. Azerbaijan, no. 31556/03, § 59, 25 October 2007;Erkan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 29840/03, 24 March 2005;G. v. Finland, no. 33173/05, § 34, 27 January 2009;Golder v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1975, § 36, Series A no. 18;Hans-Adam von Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, § 91, ECHR 2001-VIII;Harabin v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 62584/00, 9 July 2002;Harabin v. Slovakia, no. 58688/11, 20 November 2012;Juricic v. Croatia, no. 58222/09, §§ 53-57, 26 July 2011;Kayasu v. Turkey, nos. 64119/00 and 76292/01, §§ 77-79, 13 November 2008;Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 39343/98, 39651/98, 43147/98 and 46664/99, § 193, ECHR 2003-VI;Kudeshkina v. Russia, no. 29492/05, § 79, 26 February 2009;Lombardi Vallauri v. Italy, no. 39128/05, §§ 45-56, 20 October 2009;Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398/03, § 99, ECHR 2006 XIV;N.K.M. v. Hungary, no. 66529/11, 14 May 2013;Nazsiz v. Turkey (dec.), no. 22412/05, 26 May 2009;Nedelcho Popov v. Bulgaria, no. 61360/00, § 32, 22 November 2007;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no. 21722/11, §§ 87-91, 9 January 2013;Olujic v. Croatia, no. 22330/05, 5 February 2009;Pellegrin v. France [GC], no. 28541/95, § 66, ECHR 1999 VIII;Petrova and Chornobryvets v. Ukraine, nos. 6360/04 and 16820/04, § 15, 15 May 2008;Pitkevich v. Russia (dec.), no. 47936/99, 8 February 2001;Poyraz v. Turkey, no. 15966/06, §§ 55-57, 7 December 2010;Sacilor-Lormines v. France, no. 65411/01, ECHR 2006 XIII;Saygılı and Seyman v. Turkey, no. 51041/99, §§ 24-25, 27 June 2006;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 46295/99, § 78, ECHR 2002-IV;Tosti v. Italy (dec.), no. 27791/06, 12 May 2009;Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00, ECHR 2007-II;Volkov v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 21722/11, 18 October 2011;Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396/95, §§ 42-43, ECHR 1999 VII
|
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-3 - Ratione materiae);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court);Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Just satisfaction reserved
|
TRUE
|
|
61
|
2026112_17062015
|
Baka v. Hungary (no. 20261/12)
|
2015-06-17 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"20261/12"
] |
001-163113
|
CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163113
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0623JUD002026112
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2016-06-23 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2",
"41"
] |
[
"HUN"
] |
Articles 47 (2), 48 (1) and (3) and 50 (3) of the 1949 Constitution ; Fundamental Law of Hungary of 25 April 2011 ; Section 11 (2) of the Transitional Provisions of the Fundamental Law of Hungary (2011, entered into force on 1 January 2012) ; Sections 62, 69, 73 and 74/A (1) of the Organisation and Administration of the Courts Act (Act LXVI of 1997) ; Section 185 of the Organisation and Administration of the Courts Act (Act CLXI of 2011, entered into force on 1 January 2012) ; Section 45 (1) of Parliamentary decision 46/1994. (IX.30.) OGY on the Rules of Parliament
|
Aktaş v. Turkey, no. 24351/94, § 79, ECHR 2003 V (extracts);Albayrak v. Turkey, no. 38406/97, §§ 40-42, 31 January 2008;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876/08 § 108, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Association Ekin v. France, no. 39288/98, § 61, ECHR 2001 VIII;Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, § 90, 7 February 2012;Bayer v. Germany, no. 8453/04, § 38, 16 July 2009;Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) [GC], no. 22251/08, § 42, ECHR 2015;Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no. 37575/04, §§ 90-91, ECHR 2012;Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131;Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, §§ 47-48, Series A no. 236;Colombani and Others v. France, no. 51279/99, § 66, ECHR 2002 V;Creangă v. Romania [GC], no. 29226/03, §§ 88-90, 23 February 2012;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, §§ 177-179, ECHR 2007 IV;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569/09, § 131, ECHR 2015;Di Giovanni v. Italy, no. 51160/06, 9 July 2013;Dzhidzheva-Trendafilova v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 12628/09, 9 October 2012;Efendiyeva v. Azerbaijan, no. 31556/03, § 59, 25 October 2007;El Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630/09, §§ 151-152, ECHR 2012;Fadeyeva v. Russia, no. 55723/00, § 79, ECHR 2005 IV;Fruni v. Slovakia, no. 8014/07, § 145, 21 June 2011;G. v. Finland, no. 33173/05, 27 January 2009;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 36, Series A no. 18;Guja v. Moldova [GC], no. 14277/04, § 52, ECHR 2008;Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24;Harabin v. Slovakia, no. 58688/11, 20 November 2012;Henryk Urban and Ryszard Urban v. Poland, no. 23614/08, § 53, 30 November 2010;Ivanova v. Bulgaria, no. 52435/99, §§ 83-84, 12 April 2007;Juričić v. Croatia, no. 58222/09, 26 July 2011;Karaduman and Tandoğan v. Turkey, nos. 41296/04 and 41298/04, § 9, 3 June 2008;Kayasu v. Turkey, nos. 64119/00 and 76292/01, 13 November 2008;Kudeshkina v. Russia, no. 29492/05, §§ 79-100, 26 February 2009;Kuznetsov and Others v. Russia, no. 184/02, § 87, 11 January 2007;Kyprianou v. Cyprus [GC], no. 73797/01, §§ 171 and 181, ECHR 2005 XIII;Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, § 46, ECHR 2007-IV;Lombardi Vallauri v. Italy, no. 39128/05, §§ 45-56, 20 October 2009;Makhmudov v. Russia, no. 35082/04, §§ 68-73, 26 July 2007;Mamère v. France, no. 12697/03, §§ 23-24, ECHR 2006 XIII;Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398/03, § 99, ECHR 2006 XIV;Morice v. France [GC], no. 29369/10, 23 April 2015;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 147, ECHR 2005-VII;Nedelcho Popov v. Bulgaria, no. 61360/00, 22 November 2007;Ohneberg v. Austria, no. 10781/08, § 25, 18 September 2012;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no. 21722/11, ECHR 2013;Olujić v. Croatia, no. 22330/05, 5 February 2009;Özpınar v. Turkey, no. 20999/04, § 30, 19 October 2010;Pellegrin v. France [GC], no. 28541/95, ECHR 1999 VIII;Perinçek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510/08, § 196, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Pitkevich v. Russia (dec.), no. 47936/99, 8 February 2001;Poyraz v. Turkey, no. 15966/06, §§ 55-57, 7 December 2010;Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, § 119, ECHR 2005 X;Roland Dumas v. France, no. 34875/07, § 43, 15 July 2010;Savino and Others v. Italy, nos. 17214/05, 20329/05 and 42113/04, §§ 68-69, 28 April 2009;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 230, ECHR 2012;Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, § 95, ECHR 2005-II;Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, 9 December 1994, §§ 47-50, Series A no. 301 B;Sükut v. Turkey (dec.), no. 59773/00, 11 September 2007;Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-IV;Tsanova Gecheva v. Bulgaria, no. 43800/12, 15 September 2015;Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00, ECHR 2007 II;Vistiņš and Perepjolkins v. Latvia [GC], no. 71243/01, § 99, 25 October 2012;Vogt v. Germany, 26 September 1995, § 53, Series A no. 323;Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396/95, ECHR 1999 VII;Zander v. Sweden, 25 November 1993, § 24, Series A no. 279 B
|
Point 20 of the Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary adopted by the Seventh United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders (Milan, 1985) and endorsed by UN General Assembly Resolutions 40/32 of 29 November 1985 and 40/146 of 13 December 1985;Paragraphs 1.3, 5.1 and 7.2 of the European Charter on the Statute for Judges (Strasbourg, 8-10 July 1998) (meeting organised under the auspices of the Council of Europe), endorsed by the Presidents of the Supreme Courts of Central and Eastern European countries (Kyiv, 12-4 October 1998), and again by judges and representatives from Ministries of Justice from 25 European countries (Lisbon, 8-10 April 1999);Paragraphs 59-60 of Opinion no. 1 (2001) of the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE) on standards concerning the independence of the judiciary and the irremovability of judges (23 November 2001);Opinion no. 3 (2002) of the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE) on the principles and rules governing judges’ professional conduct, in particular ethics, incompatible behaviour and impartiality (19 November 2002);General Comment no. 32 on Article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Right to equality before courts and tribunals and to a fair trial) of the United Nations Human Rights Committee (23 August 2007);Paragraphs 3, 6 and 9 of the Magna Carta of Judges (Fundamental Principles) adopted by the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE) (November 2010);Opinion on the Legal Status and Remuneration of Judges Act (Act CLXII of 2011) and the Organisation and Administration of the Courts Act (Act CLXI of 2011), adopted by the Venice Commission at its 90th Plenary Session (Venice, 16-17 March 2012, CDL-AD(2012)001);Report on the “Request for the opening of a monitoring procedure in respect of Hungary” adopted by the Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by the Member States (Monitoring Committee) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (10 June 2013)
|
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Civil rights and obligations;Determination (civil));Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
62
|
2045214_06122017
|
Molla Sali v. Greece (no. 20452/14)
|
2017-12-06 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"20452/14"
] |
001-188985
|
CASE OF MOLLA SALI v. GREECE
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-188985
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1219JUD002045214
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2018-12-19 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"14",
"14+P1-1",
"34",
"35",
"35-1",
"41",
"P1-1",
"P1-1-1"
] |
[
"GRC"
] |
Article 1724 of the Civil Code ; Article 11 of the 1913 Treaty of Athens ; Section 4 of Law no. 147/1914 ; Section 10 of Law no. 2345/1920 ; Section 5(2) of Law no. 1920/1991
|
Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 68, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, § 56, ECHR 2000 III;Beian v. Romania (no. 1), no. 30658/05, § 39, ECHR 2007-V (extracts);Beyeler v. Italy [GC], no. 33202/96, § 105, ECHR 2000 I;Biao v. Denmark [GC], no. 38590/10, § 88, 24 May 2016;Brosset-Triboulet v. France [GC] no. 34078/02, 29 March 2010;Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184/05, ECHR 2010;Clift v. the United Kingdom, no. 7205/07, §§ 56-59, 13 July 2010;D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, § 177, ECHR 2007 IV;E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546/02, §§ 47-48, 22 January 2008;Efe v. Austria, no. 9134/06, § 48, 8 January 2013;Fábián v. Hungary [GC], no. 78117/13, §§ 112-113, 5 September 2017;Fabris v. France [GC], no. 16574/08, §§ 51-56, ECHR 2013;Gherghina v. Romania [GC] (dec.), no. 42219/07, § 85, 9 July 2015;Guberina v. Croatia, no. 23682/13, § 78, ECHR 2016;İzzettin Doğan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, 26 April 2016;Karoussiotis v. Portugal, no. 23205/08, § 57, 1 February 2011;Khamtokhu and Aksenchik v. Russia [GC], nos. 60367/08 and 961/11, §§ 64-65, 24 January 2017;Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no. 30078/06, ECHR 2012;Korbely v. Hungary [GC], no. 9174/02, § 72, ECHR 2008;Leyla Şahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774/98, §§ 108-10, ECHR 2005 XI;Lombardi Vallauri v. Italy, no. 39128/02, 20 October 2009;Mazurek v. France, no. 34406/97, § 42, ECHR 2000-II;Merger and Cros v. France, no. 68864/01, § 32, 22 November 2004;Negrepontis-Giannisis v. Greece, no. 56759/08, 3 May 2011;Parrillo v. Italy [GC], no. 46470/11, § 211, CEDH 2015;Pellegrini v. Italy, no. 30882/96, ECHR 2001-VIII;Pla and Puncernau v. Andorra, ECHR 2004-VIII, § 46;Prencipe v. Monaco, no. 43376/06, § 93, 16 July 2009;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/10, 20 March 2018;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 46, ECHR 2006-II;Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 76, ECHR 1999 V;Serif v. Greece, no. 38178/97, § 40, ECHR 1999-IX;Şerife Yiğit v. Turkey [GC], no. 3976/05, § 52, 2 November 2010;Škorjanec v. Croatia, no. 25536/14, § 55, 28 March 2017;Söderman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786/08, § 107, ECHR 2013;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, § 55, ECHR 2005-X;Stummer v. Austria [GC], no. 37452/02, § 88, ECHR 2011;Thlimmenos v. Greece [GC], no. 34369/97, ECHR 2000 IV;Vallianatos and Others v. Greece [GC], nos. 29381/09 and 32684/09, § 85, ECHR 2013 (extracts);Vučković and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], no. 17153/11 and 29 others, § 74, 25 March 2014;Waite and Kennedy v. Germany [GC], no. 26083/94, § 54, ECHR 1999-I;Weller v. Hungary, no. 44399/05, § 37, 31 March 2009;X and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 19010/07, § 98, ECHR 2013
|
Treaty of Lausanne;Treaty of Sèvres;Article 3 § 1 of the Council of Europe Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities
|
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Victim;Violation of Article 14+P1-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property;Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Possessions);Just satisfaction reserved (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
63
|
2045214_06122017
|
Molla Sali v. Greece (no. 20452/14)
|
2017-12-06 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"20452/14"
] |
001-203370
|
CASE OF MOLLA SALI v. GREECE
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-203370
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0618JUD002045214
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2020-06-18 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"41"
] |
[
"GRC"
] |
Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain (Article 50), 13 July 1994, § 17, Series A no. 285-C;Brumărescu v. Romania (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 28342/95, § 20, ECHR 2001 I;Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 13216/05, § 59, ECHR 2017;Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 29, ECHR 2000 IV;Cyprus v. Turkey (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 25781/94, § 56, ECHR 2014;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium (Article 50), 10 March 1972, § 16, Series A no. 14;Former King of Greece and Others v. Greece [GC] (just satisfaction), no. 25701/94, § 79, 28 November 2002;Guiso-Gallisay v. Italy (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 58858/00, § 90, 22 December 2009;Kurić and Others v. Slovenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 26828/06, § 79, ECHR 2014;Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece (Article 50), 31 October 1995, § 38, Series A no. 330-B;S.C. Granitul S.A. v. Romania (just satisfaction), no. 22022/03, § 15, 24 April 2012;Kryvenkyy v. Ukraine, no. 43768/07, § 52, 16 February 2017;Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 40167/06, § 39, 12 December 2017;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064/90 and 8 others, § 224, ECHR 2009;Vistiņš and Perepjolkins v. Latvia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 71243/01, ECHR 2014
|
Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
||
64
|
2172211_12062012
|
Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine (no. 21722/11)
|
2012-06-12 00:00:00
|
Chamber hearing
|
[
"21722/11"
] |
001-107361
|
VOLKOV v. UKRAINE
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-107361
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1018DEC002172211
|
DECISIONS
| 4
|
[
"6",
"8",
"13"
] |
[
"UKR"
] |
Partly inadmissible
| |||||
65
|
2172211_12062012
|
Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine (no. 21722/11)
|
2012-06-12 00:00:00
|
Chamber hearing
|
[
"21722/11"
] |
001-115871
|
CASE OF OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. UKRAINE
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115871
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0109JUD002172211
|
CHAMBER
|
2013-01-09 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"41",
"46",
"46-2"
] |
[
"UKR"
] |
Sections 19-21 and 23 of the Judges (Election and Dismissal) Act 2004 ; Article 84 and 131 of the Constitution ; HCJ Act 1998 ; Status of Members of Parliament Act 1992 ; Rules of Parliament ; Article 171-1 §§ 1 and 5 of the Code of Administrative Justice ; Sections 10, 20 and 41 of the Judicial System Act 2002
|
A. v. Norway, no. 28070/06, §§ 63 and 64, 9 April 2009;Ajdaric v. Croatia, no. 20883/09, 13 December 2011;Albert and Le Compte v. Belgium, 10 February 1983, §§ 29-30, Series A no. 58;Aleksanyan v. Russia, no. 46468/06, § 240, 22 December 2008;Argyrou and Others v. Greece, no. 10468/04, § 24, 15 January 2009;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, §§ 198 and 202-203, ECHR 2004-II;Bayer v. Germany, no. 8453/04, § 37, 16 July 2009;Bigaeva v. Greece, no. 26713/05, §§ 22-25, 28 May 2009;Bogatova v. Ukraine, no. 5231/04, § 13, 7 October 2010;Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 194, ECHR 2004-V;Brualla Gómez de la Torre v Spain, 19 December 1997, § 41, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VIII;Brudnicka and Others v. Poland, no. 54723/00, § 38, ECHR 2005-II;Brumarescu v. Romania (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 28342/95, § 20, ECHR 2001-I;Bryan v. the United Kingdom, 22 November 1995, §§ 44 - 47, Series A no. 335-A;Buscarini v. San Marino (dec.), no. 31657/96, 4 May 2000;C. v. Belgium, 7 August 1996, § 25, Reports 1996-III;C.G. and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 1365/07, § 39, 24 April 2008;De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984, § 26, Series A no. 86;Diya 97 v. Ukraine, no. 19164/04, § 47, 21 October 2010;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, §§ 82-83, Series A no. 22;Fatullayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 40984/07, §§ 176 and 177, 22 April 2010;Fey v. Austria, 24 February 1993, Series A no. 255, §§ 28 and 30;Findlay v the United Kingdom, 25 February 1997, § 73, Reports 1997-I;Fruni v. Slovakia, no. 8014/07, §134, 21 June 2011;Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, 27 March 1996, § 33, Reports 1996-II;Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158/98, §§ 64-65, ECHR 2004-I;Gurov v. Moldova, no. 36455/02, § 37-39, 11 July 2006;Huseyn and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 35485/05, 45553/05, 35680/05 and 36085/05, § 262, 26 July 2011;Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, § 487, ECHR 2004-VII;Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 39343/98, 39651/98, 43147/98 and 46664/99, § 193, ECHR 2003-VI;Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, § 55, Reports 1998-II;Kyprianou v. Cyprus [GC], no. 73797/01, § 119, ECHR 2005-XIII;Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium, 23 June 1981, § 58, Series A no. 43;Lungoci v. Romania, no. 62710/00, 26 January 2006;Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 47, ECHR 2004-I;Matyjek v. Poland (dec.), no. 38184/03, §§ 53 and 54, ECHR 2006-VII;Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056/06, §§ 99 and 100, ECHR 2009;Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 29, Series A no. 251-B;Oberschlick v. Austria (no. 1), 23 May 1991, §§ 50-52, Series A no. 204;Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, § 210, ECHR 2005-IV;Olujic v. Croatia, no. 22330/05, § 31-45, 5 February 2009;Özpinar v. Turkey, no. 20999/04, §§ 43-48, 19 October 2010;P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 44787/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-IX;Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece (Article 50), 31 October 1995, § 34, Series A no. 330-B;Pfeifer v. Austria, no. 12556/03, § 35, 15 November 2007;Posokhov v. Russia, no. 63486/00, § 39, ECHR 2003-IV;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 61, ECHR 2002-III;Pullar v. the United Kingdom, 10 June 1996, § 32, Reports 1996-III;Sacilor-Lormines v. France, no. 65411/01, § 62, ECHR 2006-XIII;Savino and Others v. Italy, nos. 17214/05, 20329/05 and 42113/04, §§ 72-75, 28 April 2009;Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 190 and 191, ECHR 2006-V;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII;Sidabras and Džiautas v. Lithuania, nos. 55480/00 and 59330/00, § 47, ECHR 2004-VIII;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 46295/99, § 78, ECHR 2002-IV;Stubbings and Others v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1996, § 51, Reports 1996-IV;Suküt v. Turkey (dec.), no. 59773/00, 11 September 2007;Tepeli and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 31876/96, 11 September 2001;Tsfayo v. the United Kingdom, no. 60860/00, §§ 42-43, 14 November 2006;Vereinigung demokratischer Soldaten Österreichs and Gubi v. Austria, 19 December 1994, § 31, Series A no. 302;Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00, § 62, ECHR 2007-IV;Werner v. Poland, no. 26760/95, §§ 43 and 44, 15 November 2001;Wettstein v. Switzerland, no. 33958/96, § 42, ECHR 2000-XII
|
European Charter on the statute for judges of 8-10 July 1998 (Department of Legal Affairs of the Council of Europe Document (98)23);Joint Opinion on the Law Amending Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine in Relation to the Prevention of Abuse of the Right to Appeal by the Venice Commission and the Directorate of Co-operation within the Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs of the Council of Europe, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 84th Plenary Session (Venice, 15-16 October 2010, CDL-AD(2010)029);Report by Thomas Hammarberg, Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, following his visit to Ukraine (19-26 November 2011), CommDH(2012)10
|
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal;Independent tribunal);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Tribunal established by law);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Respondent State to take individual measures (Article 46-2 - Individual measures);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46-2 - Legislative amendments);Pecuniary damage - reserved;Non-pecuniary damage - award
|
TRUE
|
66
|
2172211_12062012
|
Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine (no. 21722/11)
|
2012-06-12 00:00:00
|
Chamber hearing
|
[
"21722/11"
] |
001-180551
|
CASE OF OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. UKRAINE
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-180551
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0206JUD002172211
|
CHAMBER
|
2018-02-06 00:00:00
| 4
|
[
"37",
"37-1-b"
] |
[
"UKR"
] |
Struck out of the list (Article 37-1-b - Matter resolved)
|
FALSE
|
|||
67
|
2198004_06072016
|
Simeonovi v. Bulgaria (no. 21980/04)
|
2016-07-06 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"21980/04"
] |
001-158243
|
CASE OF SIMEONOVI v. BULGARIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-158243
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1020JUD002198004
|
CHAMBER
|
2015-10-20 00:00:00
| 4
|
[
"3",
"6",
"6+6",
"6-1",
"6-3-c"
] |
[
"BGR"
] |
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 6+6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance) (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Right to a fair trial;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)
|
FALSE
|
|||
68
|
2198004_06072016
|
Simeonovi v. Bulgaria (no. 21980/04)
|
2016-07-06 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"21980/04"
] |
001-172963
|
CASE OF SIMEONOVI v. BULGARIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-172963
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0512JUD002198004
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2017-05-12 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"3",
"6",
"6+6-3-c",
"6-1",
"6-3-c",
"41",
"46",
"46-2"
] |
[
"BGR"
] |
2009 Execution of Punishments and Pre-Trial Detention Act and its implementing regulations
|
Aleksandr Zaichenko v. Russia, no. 39660/02, §§ 41-43, 18 February 2010;Averill v. the United Kingdom, no. 36408/97, ECHR 2000 VI;Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, § 32, ECHR 2004 III;Brusco v. France, no. 1466/07, §§ 47-50, 14 October 2010;Dayanan v. Turkey, no. 7377/03, 13 October 2009;Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, §§ 42-46, Series A no. 35;Dvorski v. Croatia [GC], no. 25703/11, ECHR 2015;Eckle v. Germany, 15 July 1982, § 73, Series A no. 51;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 180, ECHR 2010;Håkansson and Sturesson v. Sweden, 21 February 1990, § 66, Series A no. 171-A;Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos. 15018/11 and 61199/12, § 280, ECHR 2014 (extracts).;Heaney and McGuinness v. Ireland, no. 34720/97, § 42, ECHR 2000 XII;Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 50541/08, 50571/08, 50573/08 and 40351/09, ECHR 2016;Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, § 36, Series A no. 275;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, § 161 in fine, Series A no. 25;John Murray v. the United Kingdom, no. 18731/91, 8 February 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 I;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, §§ 140 and 141, ECHR 2001 VII;Kurić and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828/06, §§ 235 and 236, ECHR 2012 (extracts);McFarlane v. Ireland [GC], no. 31333/06, § 143, 10 September 2010;Murray v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 10511/10, § 86, ECHR 2016;Pedersen and Baadsgaard v. Denmark [GC], no. 49017/99, § 44, ECHR 2004 XI;Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 66, ECHR 1999 II;Pishchalnikov v. Russia, no. 7025/04, 24 September 2009;Sakhnovskiy v. Russia [GC], no. 21272/03, § 90, 2 November 2010;Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, ECHR 2008;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 86, ECHR 2006 II;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 46295/99, §63, ECHR 2002-IV;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, §§ 254-55, ECHR 2012;Yankov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 4570/05, § 23, 23 September 2010
|
Reports of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (CPT) following its visits to Bulgaria in 1999 (Burgas Investigation Detention Facility), 2002 (Burgas prison), 2006, 2008, 2014 and 2015 (Sofia Prison);Statement from European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on 26 March 2015 on Bulgaria
|
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
69
|
2245716_15012020
|
X and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 22457/16)
|
2020-01-15 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"22457/16"
] |
001-189351
|
CASE OF X AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-189351
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0117JUD002245716
|
CHAMBER
|
2019-01-17 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"3",
"8",
"8-1"
] |
[
"BGR"
] |
A. v. the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VI;B.V. v. Belgium, no 61030/08, 2 May 2017;Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no 23380/09, ECHR 2015;Di Salvo v. Italy (dec.), no 16098/05, 11 January 2007;Đorđević v. Croatia, no 41526/10, § 139, ECHR 2012;Gross v. Switzerland [GC], no 67810/10, § 28, ECHR 2014;M. and C. v. Romania, no 29032/04, § 113, 27 September 2011;M.C. v. Bulgaria, no 39272/98, § 149, ECHR 2003 XII;M.P. and Others v. Bulgaria, no 22457/08, 15 November 2011;Řehák v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no 67208/01, 18 May 2004;S.Z. v. Bulgaria, no 29263/12, 3 March 2015;Szula v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 18727/06, 4 January 2007;V.C. v. Italy, no 54227/14, 1 February 2018;X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, § 20, Series A no 91;Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 29392/95, ECHR 2001 V
|
No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation;Positive obligations) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)
|
FALSE
|
||
70
|
2245716_15012020
|
X and Others v. Bulgaria (no. 22457/16)
|
2020-01-15 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"22457/16"
] |
001-207953
|
CASE OF X AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207953
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0202JUD002245716
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2021-02-02 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"3",
"8",
"8-1",
"35",
"35-3-a",
"41"
] |
[
"BGR"
] |
Criminal Code of Bulgaria
|
A and B v. Croatia, no. 7144/15, § 106, 20 June 2019;A, B and C v. Latvia, no. 30808/11, § 149, 31 March 2016;A. v. the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998, § 22, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VI;Al Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763/97, § 55, ECHR 2001 XI;Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878/08, § 234, 30 March 2016;B.V. v. Belgium, no. 61030/08, §§ 56-61 and 66, 2 May 2017;Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 134, ECHR 2004 IV (extracts);Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, §§ 118-123, ECHR 2015;Buturugă v. Romania, no. 56867/15, § 61, 11 February 2020;Đorđević v. Croatia, no. 41526/10, §§ 139 and 144-146, ECHR 2012;Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458/02, § 303, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Gross v. Switzerland [GC], no. 67810/10, § 28, ECHR 2014;Güzelyurtlu and Others v. Cyprus and Turkey [GC], no. 36925/07, §§ 233 and 235, 29 January 2019;Ilnseher v. Germany [GC], nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14, § 100, 4 December 2018;M. and C. v. Romania, no. 29032/04, § 113, 27 September 2011;M. and Others v. Italy and Bulgaria, no. 40020/03, § 104, 31 July 2012;M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, §§ 149-150, ECHR 2003 XII;M.G.C. v. Romania, no. 61495/11, §§ 58, 70 and 73, 15 March 2016;M.M.B. v. Slovakia, no. 6318/17, §§ 61 and 66, 26 November 2019;M.N. v. Bulgaria, no. 3832/06, § 48, 27 November 2012;M.P. and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 22457/08, § 111, 15 November 2011;Nencheva and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 48609/06, §§ 106 116 and 119-20, 18 June 2013;Nicolae Virgiliu Tănase v. Romania [GC], no. 41720/13, § 116, 25 June 2019;O’Keeffe v. Ireland [GC], no. 35810/09, §§ 144-148 and 157-169, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Osman v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1998, §§ 115-116, Reports 1998-VIII;Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358/12, § 84, 24 January 2017;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 126, 20 March 2018;S.M. v. Croatia [GC], no. 60561/14, §§ 241-243 and 314, 25 June 2020;S.Z. v. Bulgaria, no. 29263/12, 3 March 2015;Söderman v. Sweden [GC], no. 5786/08, § 82, ECHR 2013;Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044/96 and 2 others, § 90, ECHR 2001 II;Talpis v. Italy, no. 41237/14, § 111, 2 March 2017;V.C. v. Italy, no. 54227/14, §§ 95 and 99-102, 1 February 2018;W. v. Slovenia, no. 24125/06, § 64, 23 January 2014;Y v. Bulgaria, no. 41990/18, §§ 82 and 93, 20 February 2020;Zafranas v. Greece, no. 4056/08, § 26, 4 October 2011
|
Article 19 UN Convention on the Rights of the Child;Articles 12-14, 30-38 of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse (“Lanzarote Convention”) and Explanatoy Report;Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the Euroepan Union
|
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Abuse of the right of application;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment;Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
71
|
2268907_21032012
|
De Souza Ribeiro v. France (no. 22689/07)
|
2012-03-21 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"22689/07"
] |
001-105421
|
CASE OF DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105421
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0630JUD002268907
|
CHAMBER
|
2011-06-30 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"8",
"8-1",
"13",
"13+8",
"34"
] |
[
"FRA"
] |
Articles 511-4, L.514-1 and 2 of the Code regulating the entry and residence of aliens and asylum-seekers
|
Boyle and Rice c. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no 131;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, § 145, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V;Conka v. Belgium, no 51564/99, ECHR 2002-I;Gebremedhin [Gaberamadhien] v. France (dec.), no 25389/05, § 36, 10 October 2006;Gebremedhin [Gaberamadhien] v. France, no 25389/05, § 56, ECHR 2007-V;Jabari v. Turkey, no 40035/98, § 50, ECHR 2000-VIII;Kaftailova v. Latvia, no 59653/00, 21 October 2004;Mikheyeva c. Latvia (dec.), no 50029/99, 12 September 2002;Rotaru c. Romania [GC], no 28341/95, § 67, ECHR 2000-V
|
Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Art. 13+8
|
TRUE
|
|
72
|
2268907_21032012
|
De Souza Ribeiro v. France (no. 22689/07)
|
2012-03-21 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"22689/07"
] |
001-115498
|
CASE OF DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115498
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1213JUD002268907
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2012-12-13 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"13",
"13+8",
"34",
"41"
] |
[
"FRA"
] |
Article L. 511-4 (2) of the Code regulating the entry and residence of aliens and asylum-seekers
|
Al-Nashif v. Bulgaria, no 50963/99, § 133, 20 June 2002;Bati and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 136, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts);Boultif v. Switzerland, no 54273/00, § 46, ECHR 2001-IX;Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no 46410/99, § 54, ECHR 2006-XII;Çakici v. Turkey [GC], no 23657/94, § 112, ECHR 1999-IV;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, §§ 152 à 154, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V;Chamaïev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no 36378/02, § 448, ECHR 2005-III;Conka v. Belgium, no 51564/99, ECHR 2002-I;Doran v. Ireland, no 50389/99, § 57, ECHR 2003-X;G.H.H. and Others v. Turkey, no 43258/98, § 36, ECHR 2000-VIII;Gebremedhin [Gaberamadhien] v. France, no 25389/05, ECHR 2007-II;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no 27765/09, 23 February 2012;I.M. v. France, no 9152/09, 2 February 2012;Jabari v. Turkey, no 40035/98, ECHR 2000-VIII;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no 25702/94, §§ 140-141, ECHR 2001-VII;Khan v. Royaume-uni, no 35394/97, §§ 44 à 47, ECHR 2000-V;Kudla v. Poland [GC], no 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI;Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, §§ 77 and 81 à 83, Series A no 116;M. and Others v. Bulgaria, no 41416/08, §§ 122 à 132, 26 July 2011;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no 30696/09, §§ 286-287, ECHR 2011;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no 28341/95, § 69, ECHR 2000-V;Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no 926/05, § 61, ECHR 2010;Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom, 30 October 1991, § 122, Series A no 215
|
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Violation of Article 13+8 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 8-2 - Interference;Prescribed by law;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Expulsion) (Brazil);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award
|
TRUE
|
|
73
|
231208_12122012
|
Maktouf and Damjanovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (nos. 2312/08 and 34179/08)
|
2012-12-12 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"2312/08"
] |
001-112346
|
MAKTOUF v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-112346
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
|
2010-08-31 00:00:00
| 4
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"7",
"7-1"
] |
[
"BIH"
] |
Communicated
|
FALSE
|
||||
74
|
231208_12122012
|
Maktouf and Damjanovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (nos. 2312/08 and 34179/08)
|
2012-12-12 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"2312/08",
"34179/08"
] |
001-122716
|
CASE OF MAKTOUF AND DAMJANOVIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122716
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0718JUD000231208
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2013-07-18 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"7",
"7-1",
"14",
"35",
"35-1",
"41",
"P12-1"
] |
[
"BIH"
] |
Articles 24 § 1, 37 § 2, 38 § 1 and § 2 , 43 § 1 and 142 § 1 of the 1976 Criminal Code ; Articles 31 § 1, 42 §§ 1 and 2, 49, 50 § 1 and 173 § 1 of the 2003 Criminal Code
|
Achour v. France [GC], no. 67335/01, § 44, ECHR 2006-IV;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, §§ 65-69, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV;Brudnicka and Others v. Poland, no. 54723/00, § 38, ECHR 2005-II;Camilleri v. Malta, no. 42931/10, 22 January 2013;Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom, 28 June 1984, § 78, Series A no. 80;Ecer and Zeyrek v. Turkey, nos. 29295/95 and 29363/95, ECHR 2001-II;Flux v. Moldova (no. 2), no. 31001/03, § 27, 3 July 2007;Gabarri Moreno v. Spain, no. 68066/01, 22 July 2003;Henryk Urban and Ryszard Urban v. Poland, no. 23614/08, §§ 45-53, 30 November 2010;Jamil v. France, 8 June 1995, Series A no. 317-B;Karmo v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 76965/01, 9 February 2006;Kononov v. Latvia [GC], no. 36376/04, ECHR 2010;Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135/95, § 50, ECHR 2000 VI;Mirazovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), no. 13628/03, 6 May 2006;Ould Dah v. France (dec.), no. 13113/03, ECHR 2009;Palic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 4704/04, 15 February 2011;S.W. v. the United Kingdom, 22 November 1995, Series A no. 335-B;Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, 17 September 2009;Sejdic and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 27996/06 and 34836/06, § 55, ECHR 2009;Šimšic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), no. 51552/10, 10 April 2012;Stafford v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 46295/99, § 78, ECHR 2002-IV;Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044/96, 35532/97 and 44801/98, ECHR 2001-II
|
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Heavier penalty;Retroactivity);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient
|
TRUE
|
|
75
|
2338009_08102014
|
Bouyid v. Belgium (no. 23380/09)
|
2014-10-08 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"23380/09"
] |
001-138779
|
CASE OF BOUYID v. BELGIUM
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-138779
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1121JUD002338009
|
CHAMBER
|
2013-11-21 00:00:00
| 2
|
[
"3",
"35"
] |
[
"BEL"
] |
Campbell and Cosans v. the United Kingdom, 25 February 1982, § 30, Series A no 48;Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1993, § 32, Series A no 247 C;Creanğa v. Romania [GC], no 29226/03, § 88, 23 February 2012;El Masri v. “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” [GC], no. 39630/09, ECHR 2012;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no 25;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no 54810/00, § 67, ECHR 2006-IX;Kudła v. Poland [GC], no 30210/96, § 92, ECHR 2000-XI;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772/95, § 121, ECHR 2000 IV;M.S.S. v. Belgium [GC], no 30696/09, § 220, ECHR 2011;Mete and Others v. Turkey, no 294/08, 4 October 2012;Perez v. France [GC], no 47287/99, § 70, ECHR 2004 I;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no 2346/02, § 52, ECHR 2002-III;Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 38, Series A no 336;Rivas v. France, no 59584/00, 1 April 2004;Salman v. Turkey [GC], no 21986/93, ECHR 2000 VII
|
Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect)
|
TRUE
|
||
76
|
2338009_08102014
|
Bouyid v. Belgium (no. 23380/09)
|
2014-10-08 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"23380/09"
] |
001-157670
|
CASE OF BOUYID v. BELGIUM
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-157670
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0928JUD002338009
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2015-09-28 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"3",
"41"
] |
[
"BEL"
] |
A.S. v. France [GC] no 43835/11, §§ 122 and 141 ECHR 2014 (extracts);Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, § 64, Reports 1996 VI;Asiatiques d’Afrique orientale v. the United Kingdom, nos. 4403/70, 4404/70, 4405/70, 4406/70, 4407/70, 4408/70, 4409/70, 4410/70, 4411/70, 4412/70, 4413/70, 4414/70, 4415/70, 4416/70, 4417/70, 4418/70, 4419/70, 4422/70, 4423/70, 4434/70, 4443/70, 4476/70, 4477/70, 4478/70, 4486/70, 4501/70, 4526/70, 4527/70, 4528/70, 4529/70 and 4530/70, report of 14 December 1973, Decisions and Reports 78-B, § 192;C.R. v. the United Kingdom, 22 November 1995, § 42, Series A no 335 C;Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, § 79, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 V;Cobzaru v. Romania, no 48254/99, § 65, 26 July 2007;Darraj v. France, no 34588/07, § 44, 4 November 2010;Davydov and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 17674/02 and 39081/02, 1 July 2010;Denisenko and Bogdanchikov v. Russia, no 3811/02, § 83, 12 February 2009;Egmez v. Cyprus, no 30873/96, § 78, ECHR 2000 XII;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no 39630/09, ECHR 2012;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no 22978/05, ECHR 2010;Georgia v. Russia (I) [GC], no 13255/07, § 192, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Georgiy Bykov v. Russia, no 24271/03, § 51, 14 October 2010;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no 25;Iurcu v. the Republic of Moldova, no 33759/10, 9 April 2013;Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no 54810/00, § 67, ECHR 2006 IX;Jeunesse v. the Netherlands [GC], no 12738/10, § 135, 3 October 2014;Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no 50222/99, § 53, 30 September 2004;Kudła v. Poland [GC], no 30210/96, § 94, ECHR 2000 XI;Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772/95, ECHR 2000 IV;M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no 30696/09, § 220, ECHR 2011;McKerr v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 28883/95, 4 April 2000;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no 28883/95, § 114, ECHR 2001 III;Mete and Others v. Turkey, no 294/08, 4 October 2012;Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, ECHR (extracts);Okkalı v. Turkey, no 52067/99, ECHR 2006 XII (extracts);Petyo Petkov v. Bulgaria, no 32130/03, §§ 42 and 47, 7 January 2010;Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no 2346/02, § 65, ECHR 2002 III;Ramirez Sanchez v. France [GC], no 59450/00, § 117, ECHR 2006 IX;Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, Series A no 336;Rivas v. France, no 59584/00, 1 April 2004;S.W. v. the United Kingdom, 22 November 1995, § 44, Series A no 335 B;Salman v. Turkey [GC], no 21986/93, ECHR 2000 VII;Samüt Karabulut v. Turkey, no 16999/04, §§ 41 and 58, 27 January 2009;Selmouni v. France [GC], no 25803/94, ECHR 1999 V;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Turan Çakır v. Belgium, no 44256/06, § 54, 10 March 2009;Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, § 32, Series A no 26;V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 24888/94, § 71, ECHR 1999 IX;Valašinas v. Lithuania, no 44558/98, § 102, ECHR 2001 VIII;Vasyukov Russia, no 2974/05, § 59, 5 April 2011;Yankov v. Bulgaria, no 39084/97, § 114, ECHR 2003 XII (extracts);Yazgül Yılmaz v. Turkey, no 36369/06, 1er February 2011
|
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
||
77
|
2375507_07102015
|
Buzadji v. Republic of Moldova (no. 23755/07)
|
2015-10-07 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"23755/07"
] |
001-148659
|
CASE OF BUZADJI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-148659
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1216JUD002375507
|
CHAMBER
|
2014-12-16 00:00:00
| 4
|
[
"5",
"5-3"
] |
[
"MDA"
] |
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention)
|
TRUE
|
|||
78
|
2375507_07102015
|
Buzadji v. Republic of Moldova (no. 23755/07)
|
2015-10-07 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"23755/07"
] |
001-164928
|
CASE OF BUZADJI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164928
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705JUD002375507
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2016-07-05 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"5",
"5-1",
"5-1-c",
"5-3",
"34",
"35",
"35-1",
"41",
"P4-2",
"P4-2-1"
] |
[
"MDA"
] |
Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642/94, § 47, ECHR 1999 III;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 171, ECHR 2004 II;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, § 64, 10 March 2009;Ciulla v. Italy, 22 February 1989, § 41, Series A no. 148;De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands, 22 May 1984, § 44, Series A no. 77;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, 18 June 1971, § 65, Series A no. 12;Delijorgji v. Albania, no. 6858/11, § 75, 28 April 2015;Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, §§ 92-93, Series A no. 39;I.A. v. France, 23 September 1998, § 108, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 VII;Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, § 140, 22 May 2012;Ilaşcu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, § 461, ECHR 2004 VII;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, § 199, Series A no. 25;Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 110, ECHR 2002 VI;Koutalidis v. Greece, no. 18785/13, § 51, 27 November 2014;Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 110 et seq., ECHR 2000 XI;Kurt v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, § 123, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 147, ECHR 2000 IV;Lavents v. Latvia, no. 58442/00, §§ 64-66, 28 November 2002;Letellier v. France, 26 June 1991, § 34, Series A no. 207;Lukanov v. Bulgaria, 20 March 1997, § 41, Reports 1997 II;Magee and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 26289/12, 29062/12 and 29891/12, 12 May 2015;Mancini v. Italy, no. 44955/98, §17, ECHR 2001 IX;McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, §§ 31-44, ECHR 2006 X;Medvedyev and Others v. France [GC], no. 3394/03, § 119, ECHR 2010;Neumeister v. Austria, judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 8, p. 37, § 4;Nikolova v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 40896/98, § 60, 30 September 2004;Ninescu v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 47306/07, § 53, 15 July 2014;Osmanović v. Croatia, no. 67604/10, §§ 40-41, 6 November 2012;Patsuria v. Georgia, no. 30779/04, § 67, 6 November 2007;R.P. and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 38245/08, § 47, 9 October 2012;Schiesser v. Switzerland, 4 December 1979, § 31, Series A no. 34;Solmaz v. Turkey, no. 27561/02, §§ 23-24, 16 January 2007;Stögmüller v. Austria, 10 November 1969, § 15, Series A no. 9;Storck v. Germany, no. 61603/00, § 75, ECHR 2005 V;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, § 79, ECHR 2014 (extracts);T.W. v. Malta [GC], no. 25644/94, § 41, 29 April 1999;Tomasi v. France, 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241 A;Toth v. Austria, 12 December 1991, § 70, Series A no. 224;Ţurcan and Ţurcan v. Moldova, no. 39835/05, § 54, 23 October 2007;Wemhoff v. Germany, 27 June 1968, p. 23, Series A no. 7;Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, 24 October 1979, § 39, Series A no. 33;Zayidov v. Azerbaijan, no. 11948/08, § 62, 20 February 2014
|
Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
||
79
|
2401405_16042014
|
Mustafa Tunç and Fecire Tunç v. Turkey (no. 24014/05)
|
2014-04-16 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"24014/05"
] |
001-122247
|
CASE OF MUSTAFA TUNÇ AND FECİRE TUNÇ v. TURKEY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122247
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0625JUD002401405
|
CHAMBER
|
2013-06-25 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"2",
"2-1",
"35",
"41"
] |
[
"TUR"
] |
Abdurashidova v. Russia, no 32968/05, § 69, 8 April 2010;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 55721/07, § 167, ECHR 2011;Angelova v. Bulgaria, no 38361/97, § 138, ECHR 2002-IV;Anik and Others v. Turkey, no 63758/00, §§ 76-77, 5 June 2007;Beker v. Turkey, no 27866/03, 24 March 2009;Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no 23458/02, ECHR 2011;Gürkan v. Turkey (no 10987/10, §§ 13 to 19, 3 July 2012;Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no 24746/94, § 109, ECHR 2001-III;Kolevi v. Bulgaria, no 1108/02, § 201, 5 November 2009;Mantog v. Romania no 2893/02, §§ 70 et seq., 11 October 2007;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no 28883/95, § 129, ECHR 2001-III;Pankov v. Bulgaria, no 12773/03, § 59, 7 October 2010;Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no 52391/99, ECHR 2007-II;Salman v. Turkey ([GC], no 21986/93, § 99, ECHR 2000-VII;Selmouni v. France [GC], no 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V;Šilih v. Slovenia [GC], no 71463/01, § 157, 9 April 2009;Stefan v. Romania (dec.), no 5650/04, § 48, 29 November 2011;Stern v. France (dec.), no 70820/01, 11 October 2005;Suprun v. Ukraine (dec.), no 7529/07, 27 April 2010;Trévalec v. Belgium, no. 30812/07, § 89, 14 June 2011;Trufin v. Romania, no 3990/04, § 52, 20 October 2009;Velcea and Mazare v. Romania, no 64301/01, 1 December 2009;Yotova v. Bulgaria, no 43606/04, § 68, 23 October 2012
|
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award
|
FALSE
|
||
80
|
2401405_16042014
|
Mustafa Tunç and Fecire Tunç v. Turkey (no. 24014/05)
|
2014-04-16 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"24014/05"
] |
001-154007
|
CASE OF MUSTAFA TUNÇ AND FECİRE TUNÇ v. TURKEY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-154007
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0414JUD002401405
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2015-04-14 00:00:00
| 2
|
[
"2",
"2-1",
"34"
] |
[
"TUR"
] |
Aktaş v. Turkey, no. 24351/94, § 301, ECHR 2003 V;Alp v. Turkey (dec.), no. 3757/09, §§ 27-33, 9 July 2013;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721/07, ECHR 2011;Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 138, ECHR 2002 IV;Anık and Others v. Turkey, no. 63758/00, §§ 76-77, 5 June 2007;Aslakhanova and Others v. Russia, nos. 2944/06, 8300/07, 50184/07, 332/08 and 42509/10, § 235, 18 December 2012;Ataykaya v. Turkey, no. 50275/08, § 47, 22 July 2014;Aydan v. Turkey, no. 16281/10, § 69, 12 March 2013;Barbu Anghelescu v. Romania, no. 46430/99, 5 October 2004;Bektaş and Özalp v. Turkey, no. 10036/03, § 66, 20 April 2010;Blečić v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532/00, §§ 66 et seq., ECHR 2006 III;Bursuc v. Romania, no. 42066/98, §§ 107-109, 12 October 2004;Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, §§ 51 et seq., ECHR 2002 I;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 147, 17 July 2014;Dobriyeva and Others v Russia, no. 18407/10, § 72, 19 December 2013;Dumitru Popescu v. Romania (no. 1), no. 49234/99, §§ 75 et seq., 26 April 2007;Đurđević v. Croatia, no. 52442/09, §§ 89-91, ECHR 2011;Edwards v. the United Kingdom, 16 December 1992, § 34, Series A no 247-B;Emars v. Latvia, no. 22412/08, §§ 85 and 95, 18 November 2014;Enukidze and Girgvliani v. Georgia, no. 25091/07, §§ 247 et seq., 26 April 2011;Erkan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 41792/10, §§ 54-62, 28 January 2014;Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458/02, ECHR 2011;Grimailovs v. Latvia, no. 6087/03, § 114, 25 June 2013;Güleç v. Turkey, 27 July 1998, Reports 1998 IV;Gürtekin and Others v. Cyprus (dec.), nos. 60441/13, 68206/13 and 68667/13, 11 March 2014;Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, § 109, ECHR 2001 III;Jaloud v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 47708/08, § 186, ECHR 2014;Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, § 89, Reports 1998 I;Kelly and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 30054/96, § 105, 4 May 2001;Kolevi v. Bulgaria, no. 1108/02, § 201, 5 November 2009;Kurić and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828/06, §§ 258 et seq., ECHR 2012 (extracts);Leyla Alp and Others v. Turkey, no. 29675/02, § 76, 10 December 2013;Mantog v. Romania, no. 2893/02, §§ 70 et seq., 11 October 2007;Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703/97, § 90, ECHR 2002 VIII;McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 161-163, Series A no. 324;McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 129, ECHR 2001 III;Menson v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 47916/99, ECHR 2003-V;Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 160, ECHR 2005 VII;Nikolova and Velichkova v. Bulgaria, no. 7888/03, § 55, 20 December 2007;Odièvre v. France [GC], no. 42326/98, § 22, ECHR 2003 III;Oğur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594/93, §§ 90-91, ECHR 1999 III;Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 342, 18 June 2002;Pankov v. Bulgaria, no. 12773/03, § 54, 7 October 2010;Pereira Henriques v. Luxembourg, no. 60255/00, § 56, 9 May 2006;Perevedentsevy v. Russia, no. 39583/05, § 107, 24 April 2014;Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, § 67, ECHR 2004-I;Putintseva v. Russia, no. 33498/04, § 52, 10 May 2012;Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391/99, § 359, ECHR 2007 II;Rupa v. Romania (no. 1), no. 58478/00, §§123 and 124, 16 December 2008;Saçılık and Others v. Turkey, nos. 43044/05 and 45001/05, § 98, 5 July 2011;Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 83, ECHR 2000-VII;Şandru and Others v. Romania, no. 22465/03, § 74, 8 December 2009;Sergey Shevchenko v. Ukraine, no. 32478/02, 4 April 2006;Stefan v. Romania (dec.), no. 5650/04, § 48, 29 November 2011;Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, § 79, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Tanrıbilir v. Turkey, no. 21422/93, §§ 54 85, 16 November 2000;Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, ECHR 1999 IV;Tikhonova v. Russia, no. 13596/05, § 82, 30 April 2014;Trufin v. Romania, no. 3990/04, § 52, 20 October 2009;Velcea and Mazăre v. Romania, no. 64301/01, §§ 113-114, 1 December 2009;Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488/98, § 80, ECHR 2000 VI;Vo v. France [GC], no. 53924/00, § 90, ECHR 2004 VIII;Yotova v. Bulgaria, no. 43606/04, § 68, 23 October 2012
|
Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 34 - Victim);No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect)
|
TRUE
|
||
81
|
2413011_13012016
|
A and B v. Norway (nos. 24130/11 and 29758/11)
|
2016-01-13 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"24130/11",
"29758/11"
] |
001-139690
|
A AND B v. NORWAY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-139690
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
| 4
|
[
"P7-4"
] |
[
"NOR"
] | |||||||
82
|
2413011_13012016
|
A and B v. Norway (nos. 24130/11 and 29758/11)
|
2016-01-13 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"24130/11",
"29758/11"
] |
001-168972
|
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2016-11-15 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"P7-4"
] |
[
"NOR"
] |
Sections 10 2(1), 10 4(1), 12-1(1)(a) and 12-2 of the Tax Assessment Act
|
Achour v. France [GC], no. 67335/01, § 44, ECHR 2006 IV;Boman v. Finland, no. 41604/11, 17 February 2015;Carlberg v. Sweden (dec.), no. 9631/04, 27 January 2009;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, § 82, Series A no. 22;Franz Fischer v. Austria, no. 37950/97, § 29, 29 May 2001;Glantz v. Finland, no. 37394/11, 20 May 2014;Göktan v. France, no. 33402/96, § 51, ECHR 2002 V;Gradinger v. Austria, 23 October 1995, § 51, Series A no. 328 C;Grande Stevens and Others v. Italy, nos. 18640/10, 18647/10, 18663/10, 18668/10 and 18698/10, 4 March 2014;Haarvig v. Norway (dec.), no. 11187/05, 11 December 2007;Janosevic v. Sweden, no. 34619/97, §§ 68-71, ECHR 2002-VII;Jussila v. Finland [GC], no. 73053/01, § 43, ECHR 2006 XIV;Kapetanios and Others v. Greece, nos. 3453/12, 42941/12 and 9028/13, §72, 30 April 2015;Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, § 68, Series A no. 28;Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000 XI;Lucky Dev v. Sweden, no. 7356/10, 27 November 2014;Maaouia v. France [GC], no. 39652/98, § 36, ECHR 2000-X;Manasson v. Sweden (dec.), no. 41265/98, 8 April 2003;Mjelde v. Norway (dec.), no. 11143/04, 11 February 2007;Muslija v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no 32042/11, 14 January 2014;Nykänen v. Finland, no. 11828/11, 20 May 2014;Österlund v. Finland, no. 53197/13, 10 February 2015;Phillips v. the United Kingdom, no. 41087/98, § 34, ECHR 2001 VII;R.T. v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 31982/96, 30 May 2000;Rinas v. Finland, no. 17039/13, 27 January 2015;Rosenquist v. Sweden (dec.), no. 60619/00, 14 September 2004;Ruotsalainen v. Finland, no 13079/03, 16 June 2009;Sismanidis and Sitaridis v. Greece, nos. 66602/09 and 71879/12, 9 June 2016;Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, § 48, ECHR 2005 X;Storbråten v. Norway (dec.), no. 12277/04, 1 February 2007;Synnelius and Edsbergs Taxi AB v. Sweden (dec.), no. 44298/02, 17 June 2008;Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no. 926/05, § 83, ECHR 2010;Tomasović v. Croatia, no. 53785/09, 18 October 2011;Västberga Taxi Aktiebolag and Vulic v. Sweden, no. 36985/97, §§ 79-82, 23 July 2002;Sergey Zolotukhin v. Russia [GC], no. 14939/03, ECHR 2009
|
No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 - Right not to be tried or punished twice-{general} (Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 - Right not to be tried or punished twice;Criminal offence)
|
TRUE
|
|
83
|
2438419_29092021
|
H.F. and M.F. v. France and J.D. and A.D. v. France (nos. 24384/19 and 44234/20)
|
2021-09-29 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"24384/19",
"44234/20"
] |
001-219333
|
CASE OF H.F. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-219333
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0914JUD002438419
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2022-09-14 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"1",
"34",
"35",
"35-3-a",
"41",
"46",
"46-2",
"P4-3",
"P4-3-2"
] |
[
"FRA"
] |
Inter-ministerial instruction no. 5995/SG of 23 February 2018 on “Provisions to be made for minors on their return from areas of terrorist group operations (in particular the Syria-Iraq border area)”
|
Abdi Ibrahim v. Norway [GC], no. 15379/16, § 180, 10 December 2021;Abdul Wahab Khan v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 11987/11, §§ 27-28, 28 January 2014;Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, §§ 24-25, Series A no. 32;Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland [GC], no. 5809/08, §§ 134 and 145-146, 21 June 2016;Al-Nashif v. Bulgaria, no. 50963/99, § 123, 20 June 2002;Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 61498/08, § 88, 30 June 2009;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721/07, §§ 131-142, ECHR 2011;Association “Regele Mihai” v. Romania, no. 26916/95, Commission Decision of 4 September 1995;Association Innocence en Danger and Association Enfance et Partage v. France, nos. 15343/15 and 16806/15, § 130, 4 June 2020;Banković and Others v. Belgium and Others (dec.) [GC], no. 52207/99, § 59, ECHR 2001-XII;Beghal v. the United Kingdom, no. 4755/16, § 88, 28 February 2019;Blečić v. Croatia [GC], no. 59532/00, § 67, ECHR 2006 III;Budayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 15339/02 and 4 others, §§ 134 and 135, ECHR 2008 (extracts);C.B. v. Germany, no. 22012/93, Commission decision, 11 January 1994;Catan and Others v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia [GC], nos. 43370/04 and 2 others, § 103, ECHR 2012 (extracts);Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, §§ 102, 103 and 110, ECHR 2014;Cyprus v. Turkey, Commission decision, § 8, 26 May 1975, no. 6780/74;De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium (Article 50), 10 March 1972, § 22, Series A no. 14;Georgia v. Russia (II) [GC] (merits), no. 38263/08, 21 January 2021;Ghoumid and Others v. France, nos. 52273/16 and 4 others, 25 June 2020;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, § 26, Series A no. 18;Gray v. Germany, no. 49278/09, 22 May 2014;Grzęda v. Poland [GC], no. 43572/18, § 342, 15 March 2022;Güzelyurtlu and Others v. Cyprus and Turkey [GC], no. 36925/07, 29 January 2019;Habsburg-Lothringen v. Austria, no. 15344/89, Commission Decision, 14 December 1989;Hanan v. Germany [GC], no. 4871/16, §§ 133-142, 16 February 2021;Hashemi and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos. 1480/16 and 6 others, § 47, 13 January 2022;Hassan and Others v. France, nos. 46695/10 and 54588/10, § 39, 4 December 2014;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765/09, §§ 52 and 53, ECHR 2012;Janowiec and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 55508/07 and 29520/09, § 213, ECHR 2013;K2 v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 42387/13, 7 February 2017;Khan v. France, no. 12267/16, § 74, 28 February 2019;Kurt v. Austria [GC], no. 62903/15, §§ 157 et seq., 15 June 2021;Lambert and Others v. France [GC], no. 46043/14, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Leyla Şahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774/98, § 152, ECHR 2005-XI;Lopes de Sousa Fernandes v. Portugal [GC], no. 56080/13, § 216, 19 December 2017;M. and Others v. Italy and Bulgaria, no. 40020/03, § 127, 31 July 2012;M.N. and Others v. Belgium (dec.) [GC], no. 3599/18, 5 May 2020;Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030/11, §§ 118-125, 8 November 2016;Marangos v. Cyprus, no. 31106/96, Commission decision of 20 May 1997;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, § 31, Series A no. 31;Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398/03, ECHR 2006-XIV;Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, 2 March 1987, § 52, Series A no. 113;Mediterraneum joint venture and 10 other applications v. Italy (dec.), no. 351/05, 29 April 2008;Medvedyev and Others v. France [GC], no. 3394/03, § 81, ECHR 2010;Momcilovic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 59138/00, 29 August 2002;Muhammad and Muhammad v. Romania [GC], no. 80982/12, §§ 122-201, 15 October 2020;N.D. and N.T. v. Spain [GC], nos. 8675/15 and 8697/15, § 171, 13 February 2020;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593/08, § 164, ECHR 2012;Naumov v. Albania (dec.), no. 10513/03, 4 January 2005;Nessa and Others v. Finland (dec.), no. 31862/02, 6 May 2003;Pişkin v. Turkey, no. 33399/18, § 227, 15 December 2020;S. v. Germany, no. 11659/85, Commission decision, 17 October 1986;Slivenko and Others v. Latvia (dec.) [GC], no. 48321/99, § 77, ECHR 2002 II (extracts);Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 86, Series A no. 161;Tagayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 26562/07 and 6 others, § 481, 13 April 2017;Ukraine v. Russia (re Crimea) (dec.) [GC], nos. 20958/14 and 38334/18, § 344, 16 December 2020;Usmanov v. Russia, no. 43936/18, § 54, 22 December 2020;Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772/02, § 81, ECHR 2009;Victor-Emmanuel De Savoie v. Italy (striking out), no. 53360/99, 24 April 2003;X and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 22457/16, § 182 and 197, 2 February 2021
|
Article 12 § 4 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR);United Nations Human Rights Committee’s (UNCCPR) General Comment no. 27 on the Freedom of Movement under Article 12 of the ICCPR, adopted on 1 November 1999 (UN Documents CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.9);Article 19 of the International Law Commission (ILC) Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection and commentary;Vienna Convention on Consular Relations adopted on 24 April 1963;Article 13 § 2 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights;Article 12 § 2 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights;Article 10 of the International Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), adopted on 20 November 1989;Explanatory Report to Protocol No. 4 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, securing certain rights and freedoms other than those
already included in the Convention and in the first Protocol thereto (STE no. 46);Four Geneva Conventions of 1949;Rule 144 of the International Committee of the Red Cross study on Customary International Humanitarian Law;Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, following her visit to France from 14 to 23 May 2018 (A/HRC/40/52/Add.4, 8 May 2019);Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly and Committee of Ministers (PACE) Recommendation 2169 (2020), entitled “International obligations concerning the repatriation of children from war and conflict zones”, adopted on 30 January 2020;Reply to Recommendation 2169, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 8 December 2020 (at the 1391st meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies);PACE Resolution 2321 (2020) adopted on 30 January 2020;PACE Committee on Social Affairs, Health and Sustainable Development Declaration adopted on 16 March 2021;European Parliament Resolution on the rights of the child (2019/2876 (RSP)), adopted on 26 November 2019;European Parliament Resolution on the Syrian conflict – 10 years after the uprising (2021/2576 (RSP)), adopted on 11 March 2021
|
Preliminary objection dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications;(Art. 34) Locus standi;Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione loci;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 4 - Prohibition of expulsion of nationals (Article 3 para. 2 of Protocol No. 4 - Enter own country);Respondent State to take individual measures (Article 46-2 - Individual measures);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
84
|
2535812_09122015
|
Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy (no. 25358/12)
|
2015-12-09 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"25358/12"
] |
001-151056
|
CASE OF PARADISO AND CAMPANELLI v. ITALY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-151056
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0127JUD002535812
|
CHAMBER
|
2015-01-27 00:00:00
| 2
|
[
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"35",
"35-3",
"41"
] |
[
"ITA"
] |
Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 62, Series A no 94;Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, §§ 65-69, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 IV;E.B. v. France [GC], no 43546/02, § 41, 22 January 2008;Gaskin v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 39, Series A no 160;Gnahoré v. France, no 40031/98, § 50, ECHR 2000 IX;Havelka and Others v. the Czech Republic, no 23499/06, §§ 34-35, 21 June 2007;Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 18 December 1986, § 55, Series A no 112;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no 25702/94, ECHR 2001 VII;Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, §§ 44-45, Series A no 290;Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1994, § 30, Series A no 297-C;Kutzner v. Germany, no 46544/99, § 56, ECHR 2002-I;Labassee v. France, no 65941/11, § 60, 26 June 2014;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, § 31, Série A no 31;Mennesson v. France, no 65192/11, § 81, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Mikulić v. Croatia, no 53176/99, ECHR 2002 I;Moretti and Benedetti v. Italy, no 16318/07, 27 April 2010;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no 10593/08, §§ 168-169, ECHR 2012;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no 41615/07, § 136, ECHR 2010;Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 29, Series A no 251-B;Nylund v. Finland (dec.), no 27110/95, ECHR 1999-VI;Pini and Others v. Romania, nos. 78028/01 and 78030/01, § 148, ECHR 2004-V;Pontes v. Portugal, no 19554/09, §§ 74-80, 10 April 2012;Pontes v. Portugal, no 19554/09, § 74, 10 April 2012;S.D., D.P., and T. v. the United Kingdom, no 23714/94, decision of the Commission of 20 May 1996;Scordino v. Italy (dec.), no 36813/97, ECHR 2003 IV;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 148, ECHR 2000 VIII;Wagner and J.M.W.L. v. Luxembourg, no 76240/01, 28 June 2007;Wallová and Walla v. the Czech Republic, no 23848/04, § 47, 26 October 2006;X, Y and Z v. the United Kingdom, 22 April 1997, § 36, Reports 1997 II;Y.C. v. the United Kingdom, no 4547/10, §§ 133-138, 13 March 2012;Zhou v. Italy, no 33773/11, §§ 55-56, 21 January 2014
|
Preliminary objection allowed (Article 35-3 - Ratione personae);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
||
85
|
2535812_09122015
|
Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy (no. 25358/12)
|
2015-12-09 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"25358/12"
] |
001-170359
|
CASE OF PARADISO AND CAMPANELLI v. ITALY
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170359
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124JUD002535812
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2017-01-24 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"35"
] |
[
"ITA"
] |
Private International Law Act (Law no. 218/1995) ; Articles 6, 8, 37bis and 72 of the Adoption Act (Law no. 184/1983) ; Medically Assisted Reproduction Act (Law no. 40/2004)
|
A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no 25579/05, ECHR 2010;Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, § 62, Series A no 94;Anayo v. Germany, no 20578/07, § 61, 21 December 2010;Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no 56679/00, § 32, ECHR 2004-III;Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no 38433/09, § 140, ECHR 2012;D. and Others v. Belgium (dec.), no 29176/13, § 49, 8 July 2014;Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no 64569/09, § 127, ECHR 2015;Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 44362/04, ECHR 2007-V;E.B. v. France [GC], no 43546/02, § 41, 22 January 2008;Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 6339/05, ECHR 2007-I;Giusto, Bornacin and V. v. Italy (dec.), no 38972/06, 15 May 2007;Hämäläinen v. Finland [GC], no 37359/09, § 67, ECHR 2014;Johnston and Others v. Ireland, 18 December 1986, § 55, Series A no 112;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no 25702/94, § 141, ECHR 2001-VII;Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, § 44, Series A no 290;Kopf and Liberda v. Austria, no 1598/06, § 37, 17 January 2012;Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, § 59, Reports 1998-II;Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1994, § 30, Series A no 297-C;Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, § 29, Series A no 176-A;Kutzner v. Germany, no 46544/99, §§ 67-82, ECHR 2002 I;Labassee v. France, no 65941/11, 26 June 2014;Marckx v. Belgium, 13 June 1979, § 31, Series A no 31;Mennesson v. France, no 65192/11, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Mikulić v. Croatia, no 53176/99, § 53, ECHR 2002-I;Moretti and Benedetti v. Italy, no 16318/07, § 48, 27 April 2010;Nazarenko v. Russia, no 39438/13, § 58, ECHR 2015 (extracts);Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no 41615/07, § 136, ECHR 2010;Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 29, Series A no 251-B;Nylund v. Finland (dec.), no 27110/95, ECHR 1999-VI;Olsson v. Sweden (no 1), 24 March 1988, § 54, Series A no 130;Parrillo v. Italy [GC], no 46470/11, § 168, ECHR 2015;Pini and Others v. Romania, nos. 78028/01 and 78030/01, § 148, ECHR 2004 V (extracts);Pontes v. Portugal, no 19554/09, §§ 74-80, 10 April 2012;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no 28341/95, § 52, ECHR 2000-V;S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no 57813/00, ECHR 2011;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, §§ 148-151, ECHR 2000 VIII;Wagner and J.M.W.L. v. Luxembourg, no 76240/01, § 117, 28 June 2007;X v. Latvia [GC], no 27853/09, § 107, ECHR 2013;X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, § 22, Series A no 91;X, Y and Z v. the United Kingdom, 22 April 1997, § 36, Reports 1997 II;X. v. Switzerland, no 8257/78, decision of the Commission of 10 July 1978, Decisions and Reports 5;Y.C. v. the United Kingdom, no 4547/10, §§ 133-138, 13 March 2012;Zhou v. Italy, no 33773/11, § 55, 21 January 2014
|
Article 5 of the Hague Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents of 5 October 1961;Article 3 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child of 20 November 1989;(Russia) Article 51 § 4 of the Family Code;(Russia) Basic Law on the Protection of Citizens’ Health, enacted on 21 November 2011 and entered into force on 1 January 2012
|
Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)
|
TRUE
|
86
|
2542409_14112012
|
Allen v. United Kingdom (no. 25424/09)
|
2012-11-14 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"25424/09"
] |
001-112344
|
ALLEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-112344
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
|
2010-12-14 00:00:00
| 4
|
[
"6",
"6-2"
] |
[
"GBR"
] |
FALSE
|
|||||
87
|
2542409_14112012
|
Allen v. United Kingdom (no. 25424/09)
|
2012-11-14 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"25424/09"
] |
001-122859
|
CASE OF ALLEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122859
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0712JUD002542409
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2013-07-12 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"6",
"6-2",
"P7-3"
] |
[
"GBR"
] |
Sections 2(1)(a) and 2(3) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968 ; Section 133 of the 1988 Act
|
A.L. v. Germany, no. 72758/01, 28 April 2005;Akay v. Turkey (dec.), no. 34501/97, 19 February 2002;Allenet de Ribemont v. France, 10 February 1995, §§ 35-36, Series A no. 308;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721/07, § 162, ECHR 2011;Ashendon and Jones v. the United Kingdom, nos. 35730/07 and 4285/08, §§ 42 and 49, 15 December 2011;Baars v. the Netherlands, no. 44320/98, 28 October 2003;Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain, 6 December 1988, § 77, Series A no. 146;Bok v. the Netherlands, no. 45482/06, 18 January 2011;Capeau v. Belgium, no. 42914/98, ECHR 2005-I;Capeau v. Belgium (dec.), no. 42914/98, 6 April 2004;Çelik (Bozkurt) v. Turkey, no. 34388/05, § 34, 12 April 2011;Constantin Florea v. Romania, no. 21534/05, §§ 50 and 52, 19 June 2012;Del Latte v. the Netherlands, no. 44760/98, 9 November 2004;Diacenco v. Romania, no. 124/04, 7 February 2012;Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, § 82, Series A no. 22;Englert v. Germany, 25 August 1987, §§ 35-37, Series A no. 123;Erkol v. Turkey, no. 50172/06, §§ 33 and 37, 19 April 2011;Fellner v. Austria (dec.), no. 64077/00, 10 October 2002;G.C.P. v. Romania, no. 20899/03, § 46, 20 December 2011;Grabchuk v. Ukraine, no. 8599/02, 21 September 2006;Hammern v. Norway, no. 30287/96, §§ 41-48, 11 February 2003;Heaney and McGuinness v. Ireland, no. 34720/97, § 40, ECHR 2000-XII;Konstas v. Greece, no. 53466/07, § 34, 24 May 2011;Lagardère v. France, no. 18851/07, §§ 73 and 76, 12 April 2012;Lamanna v. Austria, no. 28923/95, § 38, 10 July 2001;Leutscher v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1996, § 29, Reports 1996-II;Lorenzetti v. Italy, no. 32075/09, §§ 43-47, 10 April 2012;Lundkvist v. Sweden (dec.), no. 48518/99, ECHR 2003-XI;Lutz v. Germany, 25 August 1987, Series A no. 123;Maaouia v. France [GC], no. 39652/98, §§ 36-37, ECHR 2000-X;McHugo v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 55705/00, 12 May 2005;Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, Series A no. 62;Moullet v. France (dec.), no. 27521/04, 13 September 2007;Mulaj and Sallahi v. Austria (dec.), no. 48886/99, 27 June 2002;Nešták v. Slovakia, no. 65559/01, § 88, 27 February 2007;Nölkenbockhoff v. Germany, 25 August 1987, Series A no. 123;O. v. Norway, no. 29327/95, §§ 33-40, ECHR 2003-II;O.L. v. Finland (dec.), no. 61110/00, 5 July 2005;Orr v. Norway, no. 31283/04, 15 May 2008;Panteleyenko v. Ukraine, no. 11901/02, § 67, 29 June 2006;Phillips v. the United Kingdom, no. 41087/98, § 31, ECHR 2001-VII;Puig Panella v. Spain, no. 1483/02, § 50, 25 April 2006;Radio France and Others v. France, no. 53984/00, § 24, ECHR 2004-II;Reeves v. Norway (dec.), no. 4248/02, 8 July 2004;Ringvold v. Norway, no. 34964/97, ECHR 2003-II;Roatis v. Austria (dec.), no. 61903/00, 27 June 2002;Rushiti v. Austria, no. 28389/95, § 27, 21 March 2000;Salabiaku v. France, 7 October 1988, § 28, Series A no. 141-A;Saunders v. the United Kingdom, 17 December 1996, § 68, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI;Sekanina v. Austria, 25 August 1993, Series A no. 266-A;Šikic v. Croatia, no. 9143/08, § 47, 15 July 2010;Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 87, Series A no. 161;Taliadorou and Stylianou v. Cyprus, nos. 39627/05 and 39631/05, 16 October 2008;Telfner v. Austria, no. 33501/96, § 15, 20 March 2001;Tendam v. Spain, no. 25720/05, 13 July 2010;Vanjak v. Croatia, no. 29889/04, 14 January 2010;Vassilios Stavropoulos v. Greece, no. 35522/04, 27 September 2007;Vulakh and Others v. Russia, no. 33468/03, § 32, 10 January 2012;Weixelbraun v. Austria, no. 33730/96, 20 December 2001;Y. v. Norway, no. 56568/00, § 39, ECHR 2003-II;Yassar Hussain v. the United Kingdom, no. 8866/04, ECHR 2006-III;Zollman v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 62902/00, ECHR 2003-XII
|
Article 14(6) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966 (ICCPR);Explanatory Report to Protocol 7
|
No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-2 - Presumption of innocence)
|
TRUE
|
88
|
2570311_21012015
|
Dvorski v. Croatia (no. 25703/11)
|
2015-01-21 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"25703/11"
] |
001-138579
|
CASE OF DVORSKI v. CROATIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-138579
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1128JUD002570311
|
CHAMBER
|
2013-11-28 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"3",
"6",
"6+6-3-c",
"6-1",
"6-3-c",
"35"
] |
[
"HRV"
] |
Article 177 § 5 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
|
Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 24, Series A no. 32;Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, § 118, ECHR 2011;Benham v. the United Kingdom, 10 June 1996, § 52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 III;Bogumil v. Portugal, no. 35228/03, § 46, 7 October 2008;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, 10 March 2009;Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom, 28 June 1984, § 99, Series A no. 80;Croissant v. Germany, 25 September 1992, §§ 29 and 30, Series A no. 237-B;Czekalla v. Portugal, no. 38830/97, § 60, ECHR 2002 VIII;Desde v. Turkey, no. 23909/03, § 130, 1 February 2011;Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 187, ECHR 2010;Güveç v. Turkey, no. 70337/01, §§ 130-131, ECHR 2009;Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 27765/09, ECHR 2012;Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, § 38, Series A no. 275;Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, § 161, Series A no. 25;Klimentyev v. Russia, no. 46503/99, §§ 116-119, 16 November 2006;Krombach v. France, no. 29731/96, ECHR 2001 II;Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI;Kulikowski v. Poland, no. 18353/03, § 55, 19 May 2009;Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119-121, ECHR 2000-IV;Luchaninova v. Ukraine, no. 16347/02, § 62, 9 June 2011;Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135/95, § 45, ECHR 2000 VI;Mamaç and Others v. Turkey, nos. 29486/95, 29487/95 and 29853/96, § 48, 20 April 2004;Martin v. Estonia, no. 35985/09, § 95-97, 30 May 2013;Neziraj v. Germany, no. 30804/07, § 45, 8 November 2012;O’Kane v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 30550/96, 6 July 1999;Pakelli v. Germany, 25 April 1983, § 31, Series A no. 64;Pavlenko v. Russia, no. 42371/02, § 98, 1 April 2010;Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 67, ECHR 2001-III;Pishchalnikov v. Russia, no. 7025/04, §§ 77-79, 24 September 2009;Poitrimol v. France, 23 November 1993, § 29, Series A no. 277 A;Prehn v. Germany (dec.), no. 40451/06, 24 August 2010;Riviere v. France, no. 33834/03, § 62, 11 July 2006;Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28901/95, § 60, ECHR 2000-II;Ryabov v. Russia, no. 3896/04, §§ 40 and 43, 31 January 2008;Sakhnovskiy v. Russia [GC], no. 21272/03, § 94, 2 November 2010;Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, 27 November 2008;Sarıkaya v. Turkey, no. 36115/97, § 67, 22 April 2004;Stanford v. the United Kingdom, 23 February 1994, § 28, Series A no. 282 A;Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488/98, § 50, ECHR 2000-VI;Whitfield and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 46387/99, 48906/99, 57410/00 and 57419/00, § 48, 12 April 2005;Zagorodniy v. Ukraine, no. 27004/06, §§ 51-52, 24 November 2011
|
Remainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Legal assistance of his own choosing)
|
TRUE
|
|
89
|
2570311_21012015
|
Dvorski v. Croatia (no. 25703/11)
|
2015-01-21 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"25703/11"
] |
001-158266
|
CASE OF DVORSKI v. CROATIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-158266
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1020JUD002570311
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2015-10-20 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"6",
"6+6-3-c",
"6-1",
"6-3-c",
"41"
] |
[
"HRV"
] |
Articles 177 § 5 and 502 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
|
Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 24, Series A no. 32;Aras v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 15065/07, § 62, 18 November 2014;Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, § 33, Series A no. 37;Baloga v. Ukraine, no. 620/05, § 38, 16 September 2010;Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, § 103, 10 March 2009;Croissant v. Germany, 25 September 1992, § 29-31, Series A no. 237-B;Dayanan v. Turkey, no. 7377/03, § 32, 13 October 2009;De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands, 22 May 1984, § 48, Series A no. 77;Delcourt v. Belgium, 17 January 1970, § 31, Series A no. 11;Denk v. Austria, no. 23396/09, § 24, 5 December 2013;Erkapić v. Croatia, no. 51198/08, §§ 80-82, 25 April 2013;Goddi v. Italy, 9 April 1984, § 30, Series A no. 76;Gürkan v. Turkey, no. 10987/10, § 26, 3 July 2012;Hanif and Khan v. the United Kingdom, nos. 52999/08 and 61779/08, § 155, 20 December 2011;Horvatić v. Croatia, no. 36044/09, §§ 80-82, 17 October 2013;Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, §§ 36-38, Series A no. 275;Klimentyev v. Russia, no. 46503/99, §§ 116-118, 16 November 2006;Lisica v. Croatia, no. 20100/06, § 60, 25 February 2010;Magee v. the United Kingdom, no. 28135/95, § 45, ECHR 2000 VI;Maresti v. Croatia, no. 55759/07, § 75, 25 June 2009;Martin v. Estonia, no. 35985/09, §§ 90-97, 30 May 2013;Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, 20 January 2005;Meftah and Others v. France [GC], nos. 32911/96, 35237/97 and 34595/97, §§ 45-48, ECHR 2002 VII;Moser v. Austria, no. 12643/02, § 108, 21 September 2006;Panovits v. Cyprus, no. 4268/04, 11 December 2008;Pavlenko v. Russia, no. 42371/02, 1 April 2010;Pishchalnikov v. Russia, no. 7025/04, § 77-79, 24 September 2009;Poitrimol v. France, 23 November 1993, § 31, Series A no. 277-A;Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04, § 173, 13 July 2006;Prehn v. Germany (dec.), no. 40451/06, 24 August 2010;Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, ECHR 2008;Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 86, ECHR 2006-II;Vitan v. Romania, no. 42084/02, §§ 58-64, 25 March 2008;Zagorodniy v. Ukraine, no. 27004/06, §§ 52-55, 24 November 2011
|
Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance;Legal assistance of his own choosing;Article 6 - Right to a fair trial);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
|
90
|
2637418_05022020
|
Guðmundur Andri Ástráðsson v. Iceland (no. 26374/18)
|
2020-02-05 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"26374/18"
] |
001-184645
|
GUDMUNDUR ANDR ÁSTRÁÐSSON v. ICELAND
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-184645
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
| 4
|
[
"6",
"6-1"
] |
[
"ISL"
] |
Communicated
| ||||||
91
|
2637418_05022020
|
Guðmundur Andri Ástráðsson v. Iceland (no. 26374/18)
|
2020-02-05 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"26374/18"
] |
001-191701
|
CASE OF GUÐMUNDUR ANDRI ÁSTRÁÐSSON v. ICELAND
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-191701
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0312JUD002637418
|
CHAMBER
|
2019-03-12 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"41"
] |
[
"ISL"
] |
Administrative Procedures Act No. 37/1993 ; Temporary provision IV of the Judiciary Act No. 50/2016
|
Beuze v. Belgium [GC], no. 71409/10, 9 November 2018, § 119;Coëme and Others v. Belgium, nos. 32492/96 and 4 others, § 98, ECHR 2000 VII;DMD GROUP, a.s., v. Slovakia, no. 19334/03, § 61, 5 October 2010;Gorguiladzé v. Georgia, no. 4313/04, § 68, 20 October 2009;Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 50541/08, 50571/08, 50573/08 and 40351/09, § 315, 13 September 2016;Jorgic v. Germany, no. 74613/01, § 64, ECHR 2007-III (extracts);Lavents v. Latvia, no. 58442/00, § 114, 28 November 2002;Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (no. 2) [GC], no. 19867/12, § 99, 11 July 2017;Morice v. France [GC], no. 29369/10, § 78, 23 April 2015;Pandjikidzé and Others v. Georgia, no. 30323/02, § 104, 27 October 2009;Ramos Nunes de Carvalho E SÁ v Portugal [GC], nos. 55391/13, 57728/13 and 74041/13, §§ 144 and 222, 6 November 2018;Savino and Others v. Italy, nos. 17214/05, 20329/05 and 42113/04, § 94, 28 April 2009;Zand v. Austria, no. 7360/76, Commission report of 12 October 1978, Decisions and Reports (DR) 15, pp. 70 and 80
|
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Tribunal established by law);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
|
92
|
2637418_05022020
|
Guðmundur Andri Ástráðsson v. Iceland (no. 26374/18)
|
2020-02-05 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"26374/18"
] |
001-206582
|
CASE OF GUÐMUNDUR ANDRI ÁSTRÁÐSSON v. ICELAND
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-206582
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1201JUD002637418
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2020-12-01 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"6",
"6-1",
"41",
"46",
"46-2"
] |
[
"ISL"
] |
Section 10 of the Administrative Procedures Act no. 37/1993 ; Judiciary Act nos. 15/1998, 45/2010 and 50/2016 ; Equality Act no. 10/2008
|
A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579/05, § 281, ECHR 2010;Baka v. Hungary [GC], no. 20261/12, 23 June 2016;Belilos v. Switzerland, 29 April 1988, § 64, Series A no. 132;Brumărescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, § 61, ECHR 1999 VII;Burmych and Others v. Ukraine (striking out) [GC], nos. 46852/13 et al, §§ 120-122, 12 October 2017;Carbonara and Ventura v. Italy, no. 24638/94, § 68, ECHR 2000 VI;Chim and Przywieczerski v. Poland, nos. 36661/07 and 38433/07, §§ 138-142, 12 April 2018;Coëme and Others v. Belgium, nos. 32492/96 and 4 others, ECHR 2000 VII;Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639/11, § 63, 25 September 2018;DMD GROUP, a.s., v. Slovakia, no. 19334/03, 5 October 2010;Ezgeta v. Croatia, no. 40562/12, 7 September 2017;Fruni v. Slovakia, no. 8014/07, § 145, 21 June 2011;Garib v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 43494/09, § 137, 6 November 2017;Gorguiladzé v. Georgia, no. 4313/04, 20 October 2009;Gurov v. Moldova, no. 36455/02, §§ 36-37, 11 July 2006;Henryk Urban and Ryszard Urban v. Poland, no. 23614/08, 30 November 2010;Ilatovskiy v. Russia, no. 6945/04, §§ 38-42, 9 July 2009;Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan (infringement proceedings) [GC], no. 15172/13, 29 May 2019;Jenița Mocanu v. Romania, no. 11770/08, 17 December 2013;Jorgic v. Germany, no. 74613/01, § 64, ECHR 2007-III (extracts);Karácsony and Others v. Hungary [GC], nos. 42461/13 and 44357/13, § 190, 17 May 2016;Khrykin v. Russia, no. 33186/08, §§ 28-30, 19 April 2011;Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 39343/98 and 3 others, § 193, ECHR 2003 VI;Kontalexis v. Greece, no. 59000/08, 31 May 2011;Lavents v. Latvia, no. 58442/00, §§ 114-115, 28 November 2002;Maktouf and Damjanović v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 2312/08 and 34179/08, § 49, ECHR 2013;Medvedyev and Others v. France [GC], no. 3394/03, § 80, ECHR 2010;Miracle Europe Kft v. Hungary, no. 57774/13, 12 January 2016;Momčilović v. Serbia, no. 23103/07, 2 April 2013;Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (no. 2) [GC], no. 19867/12, § 62, 11 July 2017;Morice v. France [GC], no. 29369/10, § 128 ECHR 2015;Nejdet Şahin and Perihan Şahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 13279/05, § 56, 20 October 2011;Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, § 210, ECHR 2005 IV;Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no. 21722/11, §§ 152-156, ECHR 2013;OOO Link Oil SPB v. Russia (dec.), no. 42600/05, 25 June 2009;Pandjikidzé and Others v. Georgia, no. 30323/02, 27 October 2009;Pasquini v. San Marino, no. 50956/16, §§ 103 and 107, 2 May 2019;Posokhov v. Russia, no. 63486/00, §§ 39-44, ECHR 2003 IV;Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 149, 20 March 2018;Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e Sá v. Portugal [GC], nos. 55391/13 and 2 others, 6 November 2018;Richert v. Poland, no. 54809/07, 25 October 2011;Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, § 52, ECHR 2003 IX;S., V. and A. v. Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, § 148, 22 October 2018;Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland [GC], no. 931/13, § 164, 27 June 2017;Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, § 191, ECHR 2006 V;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000 VIII;Sokurenko and Strygun v. Ukraine, nos. 29458/04 and 29465/04, 20 July 2006;Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 254, ECHR 2012;Sutyazhnik v. Russia, no. 8269/02, 23 July 2009;Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, § 107, ECHR 2012;Zand v. Austria, no. 7360/76, Commission’s report of 12 October 1978, Decisions and Reports (DR) 15, pp. 70-80;Zeynalov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31848/07, 30 May 2013
|
Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE), Opinion no. 1 on standards concerning the independence of the judiciary and the irremovability of judges (2001);Principle 8 of the Magna Carta of Judges (Fundamental Principles) (2010, CCJE);Council of Europe Group of States Against Corruption (Greco) Fourth Evaluation Report on Iceland (2013);European Charter on the Statute for Judges of 8-10 July 1998;General Assembly of the European Network of Councils for the Judiciary, Dublin Declaration on Standards for the Recruitment and Appointment of Members of the Judiciary (May 2012);Latimer House Guidelines for the Commonwealth on Parliamentary Supremacy and Judicial Independence (1998);Recommendation 2010(12) of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on judges: independence, efficiency and responsibilities;Principle 10 of the UN Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary (1985);UN Human Rights Committee, General Comment no. 32 on Article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (2007);Fifth Periodic Report of the Government of Iceland to the UN Human Rights Committee on the implementation of the ICCPR (2010);Article 9 of the Universal Charter of the Judge (1999);Venice Commission, Rule of Law Checklist (2016);Venice Commission, Report on Judicial Appointments (2007)
|
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Tribunal established by law);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46-2 - General measures)
|
TRUE
|
93
|
2656207_14102014
|
Tagayeva and Others v. Russia (no. 26562/07)
|
2014-10-14 00:00:00
|
Chamber hearing
|
[
"26562/07"
] |
001-111101
|
TAGAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111101
|
COMMUNICATEDCASES
|
2012-04-10 00:00:00
| 4
|
[
"2",
"2-1",
"13"
] |
[
"RUS"
] |
FALSE
|
|||||
94
|
2656207_14102014
|
Tagayeva and Others v. Russia (no. 26562/07)
|
2014-10-14 00:00:00
|
Chamber hearing
|
[
"26562/07"
] |
001-155843
|
TAGAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155843
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0609DEC002656207
|
DECISIONS
| 4
|
[
"2",
"3",
"6",
"8",
"10",
"13",
"13+2",
"35",
"37",
"37-1"
] |
[
"RUS"
] |
Partly admissible;Partly inadmissible;Partly struck out of the list
| |||||
95
|
2656207_14102014
|
Tagayeva and Others v. Russia (no. 26562/07)
|
2014-10-14 00:00:00
|
Chamber hearing
|
[
"26562/07"
] |
001-172660
|
CASE OF TAGAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-172660
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0413JUD002656207
|
CHAMBER
|
2017-04-13 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"2",
"2-1",
"2-2",
"13",
"13+2",
"35",
"35-3-a",
"41",
"46",
"46-2"
] |
[
"RUS"
] |
Suppression of Terrorism Act of the Russian Federation of 1998 (Law no. 130-FZ – hereinafter “the Suppression of Terrorism Act”), in force until 1 January 2007 ; 1989 Army Field Manual (Боевой устав Сухопутных войск), enacted by the Commander-in-Chief of the Soviet Union on 9 April 1989 and published by the Ministry of Defence of the USSR in 1990
|
Abakarova v. Russia, no. 16664/07, 15 October 2015;Abramiuc v. Romania, no. 37411/02, § 119, 24 February 2009;Abuyeva and Others v. Russia, no. 27065/05, 2 December 2010;Ahmet Özkan and Others v. Turkey, no. 21689/93, §§ 311 14, 6 April 2004;Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 55721/07, § 166, ECHR 2011;Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878/08, ECHR 2016;Arzu Akhmadova and Others v. Russia, no. 13670/03, § 164, 8 January 2009;Aslakhanova and Others v. Russia, nos. 2944/06, 8300/07, 50184/07, 332/08 and 42509/10, 18 December 2012;Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 198, ECHR 2004 II;Benzer and Others v. Turkey, no. 23502/06, § 217, 12 November 2013;Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131;Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08ECHR 2014;Choreftakis and Choreftaki v. Greece, no. 46846/08, §§ 48-49, 17 January 2012;Dimov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 30086/05, 6 November 2012;Dzhamayeva and Others v. Russia, no. 43170/04, § 89, 8 January 2009;El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630/09, § 255, ECHR 2012;Ergi v. Turkey, 23818/94, 28 July 1998, Reports of Judgements and decisions1998-IV;Esmukhambetov and Others v. Russia, no. 23445/03, § 143, 29 March 2011;Finogenov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18299/03 and 27311/03, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Giuliani and Gaggio v. Italy [GC], no. 23458/02, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom, no. 24746/94, § 107, 4 May 2001;Isayeva v. Russia, no. 57950/00, 24 February 2005;Janowiec and Others v. Russia (dec.), nos. 55508/07 and 29520/09, 5 July 2011;Kaya v. Turkey, 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I;Khashiyev and Akayeva v. Russia, nos. 57942/00 and 57945/00, 24 February 2005;Maiorano and Others v. Italy, no. 28634/06, § 107, 15 December 2009;Makaratzis v. Greece [GC], no. 50385/99, ECHR 2004 XI;Mansuroğlu v. Turkey, no. 43443/98, § 80, 26 February 2008;Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703/97, § 69, ECHR 2002 VIII;McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324 § 161;McCaughey and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 43098/09, § 145, ECHR 2013;Medova v. Russia, no. 25385/04, § 96, 15 January 2009;Nihayet Arıcı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 24604/04 and 16855/05, §§ 173-76, 23 October 2012;Öneryıldız v. Turkey, [GC], no. 48939/99, ECHR 2004 XII;Osman v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VIII;P.F. and E.F. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 28326/09, § 41, 23 November 2010;Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 55, ECHR 2002 II;Perez v. France ([GC], no. 47287/99, §§ 70-71, ECHR 2004 I;Rywin v. Poland, nos. 6091/06, 4047/07 and 4070/07, §§ 213-17, 18 February 2016;Sahin v. Germany [GC], no. 30943/96, § 105, ECHR 2003 VIII;Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000 VIII;Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, § 112, ECHR 2005 II;Tagayeva and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 26562/07, §§ 470-84, 9 June 2015;Tsechoyev v. Russia, no. 39358/05, § 136, 15 March 2011;Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064/90 and 8 others, ECHR 2009;Zuban and Hamidovic v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), nos. 7175/06 and 8710/06, §§ 30-35, 2 September 2014
|
UN Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials, adopted by the Eighth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders (Havana, Cuba, 27 August to 7 September 1990);Council of Europe Guidelines on human rights and the fight against terrorism, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 11 July 2002
|
Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);No violation of Article 13+2 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 2 - Right to life;Article 2-1 - Life);Respondent State to take individual measures (Article 46-2 - Individual measures);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Respondent State to take measures of a general character (Article 46-2 - General measures)
|
TRUE
|
96
|
2751008_28012015
|
Perinçek v. Switzerland (no. 27510/08)
|
2015-01-28 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"27510/08"
] |
001-139724
|
CASE OF PERİNÇEK v. SWITZERLAND
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-139724
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1217JUD002751008
|
CHAMBER
|
2013-12-17 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2",
"35",
"41"
] |
[
"CHE"
] |
Article 261bis of the Criminal Code
|
Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 48876/08, § 100, 22 April 2013;Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, § 43, Series A no 236;Chauvy and Others v. France, no. 64915/01, § 78, ECHR 2004 VI;Cox v. Turkey, no 2933/03, 20 May 2010;De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium, 24 February 1997, § 46, Reports 1997-I;Dink v. Turkey, nos. 2668/07, 6102/08, 30079/08, 7072/09 and 7124/09, 14 September 2010;Editions Plon v. France, no 58148/00, § 53, ECHR 2004-IV;Erbakan v. Turkey, no 59405/00, 6 July 2006;Erdoğdu and İnce v. Turkey [GC], nos. 25067/94 and 25068/94, ECHR 1999 IV;Féret v. Belgium, no 15615/07, § 73, 16 July 2009;Garaudy v. France (dec.), no 65831/01, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts);Gawęda v. Poland, no 26229/95, § 39, ECHR 2002-II;Giniewski v. France, no 64016/00, ECHR 2006 I;Gündüz v. Turkey, no 35071/97, ECHR 2003 XI;Ivanov v. Russia (dec.), no 35222/04, 20 February 2007;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, Series A no 298;Kern v. Germany (dec.), no 26870/04, 29 May 2007;Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 40, Series A no 260-A;Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, § 59, Reports 1998-II;Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, § 29, Series A no 176-A;Lehideux and Isorni v. France, 23 September 1998, Reports 1998 VII;Leroy v. France, no 36109/03, 2 October 2008;Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, § 42, Series A no 103;Lopes Gomes da Silva v. Portugal, no 37698/97, § 36, ECHR 2000 X;Maestri v. Italy [GC], no 39748/98, § 30, ECHR 2004-I;Molnar v. Romania (dec.), no 16637/06, 23 October 2012;Monnat v. Switzerland, no 73604/01, ECHR 2006 X;Mouvement raëlien suisse v. Switzerland [GC], no 16354/06, § 48, ECHR 2012;Norwood v. the United Kingdom, no 23131/03, 16 November 2004;Orban and Others v. France, no 20985/05, § 34, 15 January 2009;Rekvényi v. Hungary [GC], no 25390/94, § 34, ECHR 1999 III;Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no 28341/95, § 52, ECHR 2000-V;Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no 69698/01, § 101, ECHR 2007 V;Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no 1), 26 April 1979, § 49, Series A no 30;Thorgeir Thorgeirson v. Iceland, 25 June 1992, § 63, Series A no 239;Vgt Verein gegen Tierfabriken v. Switzerland, no 24699/94, § 52, ECHR 2001-VI;Vogt v. Germany, 26 September 1995, § 48, Series A no 323;Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, 25 November 1996, § 58, Reports 1996 V;Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, judgment of 24 October 1979, § 46, Series A no 33
|
Declaration of 24 April 2013 (no. 542, Doc. 13192) from twenty members of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe;Article 2 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide on 9 December 1948;Article 5 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court adopted on 17 July 1998;Judgment of 2 September 1998 of the Chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda in the case of The Prosecutor v. Akayesu (no. ICTR-96-4-T);Judgment of 26 February 2007 of the International Court of Justice in the case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro) (ICJ Reports 2007);Judgment of 7 November 2007 (no. 235/2007) of the Spanish Constitutional Court;Case of Robert Faurisson v. France, determined by the UN Human Rights Committee on 8 November 1996, Communication no. 550/1993, doc. CCPR/C/58/D/550/1993 (1996);Article 6, sub-paragraph (c), of the Charter of the (Nuremberg) International Military Tribunal, annexed to the London Agreement of 8 August 1945;Study dated 19 December 2006 by the Swiss Institute of Comparative Law;Article 607.2 of the Spanish Criminal Code;French law no. 2001-70 of 29 January 2001 on recognition of the 1915 Armenian genocide;General Comment no. 34 on freedom of opinion and expression concerning Article 19 of the Covenant adopted by the UN Human Rights Committee
|
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient
|
TRUE
|
97
|
2751008_28012015
|
Perinçek v. Switzerland (no. 27510/08)
|
2015-01-28 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"27510/08"
] |
001-158235
|
CASE OF PERİNÇEK v. SWITZERLAND
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-158235
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1015JUD002751008
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2015-10-15 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"10",
"10-1",
"10-2",
"16",
"41"
] |
[
"CHE"
] |
Article 261 bis § 4 of the Criminal Code ; Article 264 of the Criminal Code ; Swiss Constitution of 1874 ; Articles 16 and 36 of the 1999 Constitution of the Swiss Confederation ; Section 106(2) of the Federal Court Act 2005
|
Aksu v. Turkey ([GC], nos. 4149/04 and 41029/04, § 67, ECHR 2012;Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 35763/97, §§ 56, 57 and 60-66, ECHR 2001-XI;Al Jedda v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 27021/08, §§ 100-106, ECHR 2011;Altuğ Taner Akçam v. Turkey, no 27520/07, 25 October 2011;Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom ([GC], no 48876/08, ECHR 2013;Association de citoyens Radko and Paunkovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (no 74651/01, §§ 69 and 74, ECHR 2009 (extracts);Axel Springer AG v. Germany ([GC], no 39954/08, §§ 85-88, 7 February 2012;Balsytė-Lideikienė v. Lithuania, no 72596/01, 4 November 2008;Başkaya and Okçuoğlu v. Turkey [GC], nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94, § 49, ECHR 1999 IV;Bosphorus Hava Yolları Turizm ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi v. Ireland [GC], no 45036/98, §§ 149-151, ECHR 2005-VI;Brogan and Others v. the United Kingdom, 29 November 1988, § 59, Series A no 145-B;Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria, no 49429/99, § 110, 24 November 2005;Castells v. Spain, 23 April 1992, § 39, Series A no 236;Centre de ressources juridiques au nom de Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no 47848/08, § 166, ECHR 2014;Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no 23556/94, § 34, ECHR 1999-IV;Chauvy and Others v. France, no 64915/01, ECHR 2004-VI;Chorherr v. Austria, 25 August 1993, §§ 7-8 and 28, Series A no 266-B;Cox v. Turkey, no 2933/03, §§ 27-45, 20 May 2010;Cudak v. Lithuania [GC], no 15869/02, §§ 57 and 63-67, ECHR 2010;D.I. v. Germany, no 26551/95, decision of the Commission of 26 June 1996;Del Río Prada v. Spain [GC], no 42750/09, ECHR 2013;Dink v. Turkey, nos. 2668/07, 6102/08, 30079/08, 7072/09 and 7124/09, 14 September 2010;Dzhugashvili v. Russia ((dec.), no 41123/10, §§ 26-35, 9 December 2014;Editions Plon v. France, no 58148/00, § 53, ECHR 2004-IV;Erbakan v. Turkey, no 59405/00, § 59, 6 July 2006;Erdoğdu and İnce v. Turkey [GC], nos. 25067/94 and 25068/94, § 59, ECHR 1999-IV;Fáber v. Hungary, no 40721/08, 24 July 2012;Falakaoğlu and Saygılı v. Turkey, nos. 22147/02 and 24972/03, § 33, 23 January 2007;Faruk Temel v. Turkey, no 16853/05, §§ 8 and 60, 1 February 2011;Fatullayev v. Azerbaijan, no 40984/07, § 87, 22 April 2010;Féret v. Belgium, no 15615/07, 16 July 2009;Garaudy v. France (dec.), no 65831/01, ECHR 2003-IX;Giniewski v. France, no 64016/00, § 51, ECHR 2006-I;Göktaş v. Turkey (dec.), no 59374/10, 13 December 2011;Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, Series A no 18;Gollnisch v. France (dec.), no 48135/08, 7 June 2011;Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no 44158/98, § 65, ECHR 2004-I;Grigoriades v. Greece, 25 November 1997, § 50, Reports 1997-VII;Güder v. Turkey (dec.), no 24695/09, §§ 64-65, 30 April 2013;Gündüz v. Turkey, no 35071/97, §§ 48 and 51, ECHR 2003-XI;H., W., P. and K. v. Austria, no 12774/87, decision of the Commission of 12 October 1989, DR 62, p. 216;Hachette Filipacchi Associés v. France, no 71111/01, § 47, 14 June 2007;Hizb ut-Tahrir and Others v. Germany (dec.), no 31098/08, §§ 73-74 and 78, 12 June 2012;Honsik v. Austria, no 25062/94, decision of the Commission of 18 October 1995, DR 83-B, p. 77;Incal v. Turkey, 9 June 1998, § 50, Reports 1998-IV;Jahn and Others v. Germany [GC], nos. 46720/99, 72203/01 and 72552/01, § 116, ECHR 2005-VI;Jelševar and Others v. Slovenia (dec.), no 47318/07, § 37, 11 March 2014;Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, §§ 28, 30 and 31, Series A no 298;Jobe v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 48278/09, 14 June 2011;John Anthony Mizzi v. Malta, no 17320/10, § 39, 22 November 2011;Jones and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 34356/06 and 40528/06, §§ 189, 196-198 and 201-215, ECHR 2014;Jorgic v. Germany, no 74613/01, §§ 109-113, ECHR 2007-III;Karabulut v. Turkey (dec.), no 32197/09, §§ 64-65, 17 September 2013;Karademirci and Others v. Turkey, nos. 37096/97 and 37101/97, § 42, ECHR 2005-I;Karataş v. Turkey [GC], no 23168/94, §§ 51-52, ECHR 1999-IV;Kasymakhunov and Saybatalov v. Russia, nos. 26261/05 and 26377/06, 14 March 2013;Kireçtepe and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no 59194/10, 7 February 2012;Klein v. Slovakia, no 72208/01, § 51, 31 October 2006;Kononov v. Latvia [GC], no 36376/04, § 185, ECHR 2010;Le Pen v. France (dec.), no 18788/09, 20 April 2010;Lehideux and Isorni v. France, 23 September 1998, § 53, Reports 1998 VII;Leyla Şahin v. Turkey [GC], no 44774/98, ECHR 2005-XI;Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, ECHR 2007-IV;Marais v. France, no 31159/96, decision of the Commission of 24 June 1996, DR 86-A, p. 184;Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, § 35, Series A no 62;Monnat v. Switzerland, no 73604/01, ECHR 2006-X;Mouvement raëlien suisse v. Switzerland [GC], no 16354/06, § 48, ECHR 2012;Müller and Others v. Switzerland, 24 May 1988, § 29, Series A no 133;Nachtmann v. Austria, no 36773/97, decision of the Commission of 9 September 1998;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no 10593/08, §§ 168 172, ECHR 2012;National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers v. the United Kingdom, no 31045/10, § 98, ECHR 2014;Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands Bezirksverband München-Oberbayern v. Germany, no 25992/94, decision of the Commission of 29 November 1995, DR 84-B, p. 149;Norwood v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no 23131/03, ECHR 2004-XI;Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom, 26 November 1991, § 68, Series A no 216;Ochensberger v. Austria, no 21318/93, decision of the Commission of 2 September 1994;Olsson v. Sweden (no 1), 24 March 1988, § 62, Series A no 130;Orban and Others v. France, no 20985/05, §§ 46, 49 and 51, 15 January 2009;Otegi Mondragon v. Spain, no 2034/07, §§ 10 and 53-54, ECHR 2011;Özgür Gündem v. Turkey, no 23144/93, § 64, ECHR 2000-III;Özkan v. Turkey (dec.), no 15869/09, 13 December 2011;Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no 22479/93, § 54, ECHR 1999-VI;Paksas v. Lithuania [GC], no 34932/04, § 87 in fine, ECHR 2011 (extracts);Pavel Ivanov v. Russia (dec.), no 35222/04, 20 February 2007;Perinçek v. Turkey, no 46669/99, 21 June 2005;Pessino v. France, no 40403/02, §§ 34-36, 10 October 2006;Piermont v. France, 27 April 1995, § 64, Series A no 314;Plattform « Ärzte für das Leben » v. Austria, 21 June 1988, §§ 12-13, 19 and 37-38, Series A no 139;Putistin v. Ukraine, no 16882/03, §§ 33 and 36-41, 21 November 2013;Radio France and Others v. France, no 53984/00, ECHR 2004-II;Rebhandl v. Austria, no 24398/94, decision of the Commission of 16 January 1996;Refah Partisi (the Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 41340/98, 41342/98, 41343/98 and 41344/98, ECHR 2003-II;Rekvényi v. Hungary [GC], no 25390/94, ECHR 1999-III;Remer v. Germany, no 25096/94, decision of the Commission of 6 September 1995, DR 82-B, p. 117;Rohlena v. the Czech Republic [GC], no 59552/08, § 50, ECHR 2015;S.A.S. v. France [GC], no 43835/11, § 117, ECHR 2014 (extracts);Saadi v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 13229/03, § 62, ECHR 2008;Saygılı and Falakaoğlu v. Turkey (no 2), no 38991/02, § 28, 17 February 2009;Schimanek v. Austria (dec.), no 32307/96, 1 February 2000;Seurot v. France (dec.), no 57383/00, 18 May 2004;Smolorz v. Poland, no 17446/07, § 38, 16 October 2012;Socialist Party and Others v. Turkey and Others v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, Reports 1998-III;Soros v. France, no 50425/06, § 58, 6 October 2011;Soulas and Others v. France, no 15948/03, 10 July 2008;Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria, nos. 29221/95 and 29225/95, §§ 102 and 106, ECHR 2001-IX;Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no 69698/01, ECHR 2007-V;Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no 1), 26 April 1979, §§ 48-49, Series A no 30;Sürek v. Turkey (no 1) [GC], no 26682/95, §§ 52 and 62, ECHR 1999-IV;Sürek v. Turkey (no 3) [GC], no 24735/94, § 40, 8 July 1999;T. v. Belgium, no 9777/82, decision of the Commission of 14 July 1983, DR 34, p. 158;Tammer v. Estonia, no 41205/98, § 37, ECHR 2001-I;Tekin v. Turkey (dec.), no 3501/09, §§ 64 65, 18 November 2014;The United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden – PIRIN and Others v. Bulgaria,no 59489/00, § 61, 20 October 2005;United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, 30 January 1998, § 32, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I;Vajnai v. Hungary, no 33629/06, § 49, ECHR 2008;Van Anraat v. the Netherlands (dec.), no 65389/09, §§ 90-92, 6 July 2010,;Varela Geis v. Spain, no 61005/09, 5 March 2013;Vejdeland and Others v. Sweden, no 1813/07, § 54, 9 February 2012;Vogt v. Germany, 26 September 1995, § 52, Series A no 323;Von Hannover v. Germany (no 2) ([GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, ECHR 2012;Vona v. Hungary, no 35943/10, ECHR 2013;W.P. and Others v. Poland (dec.), no 42264/98, 2 September 2004;Walendy v. Germany, no 21128/92, decision of the Commission of 11 January 1995, DR 80-B, p. 94;Weber v. Switzerland, 22 May 1990, § 51, Series A no 177;Wemhoff v. Germany, 27 June 1968, p. 23, § 8, Series A no 7;Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, 25 November 1996, § 58, Reports 1996-V;Witold Litwa v. Poland, no 26629/95, ECHR 2000-III;Witzsch v. Germany (no 1) (dec.), no 41448/98, 20 April 1999;Witzsch v. Germany (no 2) (dec.), no 7485/03, 13 December 2005;Women On Waves and Others v. Portugal, no 31276/05, §§ 28-44, 3 February 2009;X. v. the Federal Republic of Germany, no 9235/81, decision of the Commission of 16 July 1982, Decisions and Reports (DR) 29, p. 194;Yıldırım v. Turkey (dec.), no 50693/10, §§ 43-44, 17 March 2015;Zana v. Turkey, 25 November 1997, §§ 57-60, Reports 1997 VII;Ždanoka v. Latvia [GC], no 58278/00, ECHR 2006-IV
|
Article 33 § 1 of the 1969 Vienna Convention;EU Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA;Article 4 of the 1965 International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD);Resolution 68 (30) of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe;Article 6 § 1 of the Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime;Articles II and III c) of the Convention on Genocide;Articles 19 § 3 and 20 § 2 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR);Article 6 of the Rome Statute
|
Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -{General} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
|
TRUE
|
98
|
2785309_10102012
|
X. v. Latvia (no. 27853/09)
|
2012-10-10 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"27853/09"
] |
001-107888
|
CASE OF X v. LATVIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-107888
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1213JUD002785309
|
CHAMBER
|
2011-12-13 00:00:00
| 3
|
[
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"41"
] |
[
"LVA"
] |
Bronda v. Italy, 9 June 1998, § 52, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-IV;Eskinazi and Chelouche v. Turkey (dec.), no. 14600/05, 6 December 2005;García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I;Hokkanen v. Finland, 23 September 1994, § 55, Series A no. 299-A;Iosub Caras v. Romania, no. 7198/04, § 41, 27 July 2006;Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, § 27, Series A no. 176-A;Maumousseau and Washington v. France, no. 39388/05, 6 December 2007;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no. 41615/07, § 138, 6 July 2010;Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, § 69, ECHR 1999-II;Sahin v. Germany [GC], no. 30943/96, § 73, ECHR 2003-VIII;Šneersone and Kampanella v. Italy, no. 14737/09, 12 July 2011, § 95;Sommerfeld v. Germany [GC], no. 31871/96, § 64, ECHR 2003-VIII (extracts);The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, § 49, Series A no. 30;W. v. the United Kingdom, 8 July 1987, § 64, Series A no. 121
|
Article 3 and 13b of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction;Australian Family Law Act 1975
|
Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Art. 8;Non-pecuniary damage - award
|
TRUE
|
|
99
|
2785309_10102012
|
X. v. Latvia (no. 27853/09)
|
2012-10-10 00:00:00
|
Grand Chamber hearing
|
[
"27853/09"
] |
001-138992
|
CASE OF X v. LATVIA
|
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-138992
|
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD002785309
|
GRANDCHAMBER
|
2013-11-26 00:00:00
| 1
|
[
"8",
"8-1",
"8-2",
"41"
] |
[
"LVA"
] |
Section 644 of the Latvian Civil Procedure Act
|
Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, § 50, ECHR 2000 II;Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, § 33, Series A no. 37;B. v. Belgium, no. 4320/11, §§ 70-72, 10 July 2012;Demir and Baykara v. Turkey [GC), no. 34503/97, § 67, ECHR 2008-...;Eskinazi and Chelouche v. Turkey (dec.), no. 14600/05, ECHR 2005 XIII (extracts);García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999 I;Hokkanen v. Finland, 23 September 1994, § 55, Series A no. 299-A;Iglesias Gil and A.U.I. v. Spain, no. 56673/00, § 51, ECHR 2003 V;Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, § 95, 25 January 2000;K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, § 154, ECHR 2001 VII;Kurić and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828/06, § 341, ECHR 2012-...;Loizidou v. Turkey (Preliminary Objections), 23 March 1995, § 93, Series A no. 310;M. R. and L. R. v. Estonia (dec.), no. 13420/12, § 37, 15 May 2012;Maire v. Portugal, no. 48206/99, § 72, ECHR 2003 VII;Maslov v. Austria [GC], no. 1638/03, § 91, ECHR 2008-...;Maumousseau and Washington v. France, no. 39388/05, § 79, 6 December 2007;Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593/08, 12 September 2012, ECHR 2012-...;Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland, ([GC], no. 41615/07, §§ 49-55, ECHR 2010-...;Raban v. Romania, no. 25437/08, § 28, 26 October 2010;Slivenko v. Latvia [GC], no. 48321/99, § 100, ECHR 2003 X;Šneersone and Kampanella, no. 14737/09, 12 July 2011
|
Articles 3, 11, 13 b) and 20 of the Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction;Article 24 § 2 of the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights;Council Regulation (EC) No. 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility (known as “Brussels II bis Regulation”)
|
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life)
|
TRUE
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.