Datasets:
| # Known failures and non-claims | |
| - FilingsBench v0.1 has no human-gold or narrative labels yet. | |
| - Numeric concept selection does not yet cover issuer extension concepts. | |
| - 8-K support is not included in v0.1 because period-duration rules differ. | |
| - Inline-XBRL facts with segment dimensions are intentionally abstained. | |
| - A document can report more than one valid notion of revenue. v0.1 uses a fixed | |
| US-GAAP priority and exposes the chosen concept as evidence. | |
| - Confidence is rule support, not a calibrated probability. Calibration metrics | |
| remain unreported until a sufficient gold-labeled set exists. | |
| - Registrant names are strict-matched in v0.1. Filing legal names can differ from | |
| SEC Submissions aliases (for example `CORPORATION` vs `CORP`), so the strict | |
| score understates entity identity matching; no fuzzy-match score is claimed. | |
| - The deterministic baseline does not evaluate any Uraion model. No model-quality | |
| claim is made. | |
| - The Dockerfile is provided but was not built in the audit environment because | |
| no Docker runtime was installed; CI verifies the native Python package only. | |