text
stringlengths
1
299k
label
stringclasses
4 values
lang
stringclasses
2 values
" Here is Lavergne, making the ""worst mass murder in American history"" claim - from his own mouth, (start 7:00 minutes) []. As to the Gunby death, there are many possible reasons the coroner ruled it as a homocide, that are only known to the coroner. The fact that Gunby decided to stop treatment, that could have prolonged his life, sounds like suicide. However, I've addressed that here on this talk page, and also mentioned it would not be pursued any further. I do not feel, nor ever said any conspiracies were involved, I merely question the length of life and time after the shooting. I feel bad for Mr. Gunby and his families loss. As to Lavergne, read here what he says about where Whitman would be at the time Lavergne wrote this (last sentence) []. Now look up glioblastoma muti-forme grade IV brain tumor, and look at the prognosis - how could Whitman be alive as of 2006 (my best guess for when Lavergne wrote the ""Why"" article), and/or survived a lengthy trial? No, I do not have his book, but I read enough of it in Austin when it first came out, to know there was something was wrong, because he and I had access to the all of the FBI, APD and Whitman's diaries. I have all of the files and lot of the photos (I don't know if Lavergne does), plus audio interviews with Whitman's victims, professors and friends. A few of the photos in the Whitman article are mine. I represented Houston McCoy and Jeannie Speed, the widow of slain officer Billy Speed. But I realize that makes me have a WP:COI (except for the photos that others say should stay). So I have given you enough to consider, and I will return to my self-imposed ban. You forced me out, with your allegations and characterizations. You have Lavergne's book, I'm sure he will autograph it for you. Best of luck to you.2001:558:6007:27:7992:7DA3:D702:EE6A "
toxic
en
Also, I really don't need lectures from you about wikipedia policy, and I have no intention to think about what WP:CITE, WP:NPA, and the five pillars mean. I was very out of line in that edit summary (less so in the other comment, but certainly somewhat out of line), and I shouldn't have done it. And that's all I'll say on the manner.
toxic
en
WikiProject National Register of Historic Places|class=stub|importance=low}} {{
toxic
en
I asked you is Ancient Records, 3rd millenium BC Indo-European presence, and Most Western sources of Armenians in the land over 4000 years, Nationalism to you????
toxic
en
" The article in the ""Rolling Stone"" of 1970 is already mentioned in the External Links in the article on Hunter."
toxic
en
Newbusters only mentions/reports, without comment, that Mark Levin, an unreliable source(see above), questions the status, and the added citation seems to view Levin as a demagogue, so they have no part in the questioning of tax exempt status themselves. It is unclear as to why York is included since he in no way brings up the issue of whether MMfA should have tax exempt status. Conservative reception should not be a vehicle for fringe positions. The Progressive Reception section, while weak and probably a good candidate for removal as well, doesn't sink that low. Mr
toxic
en
" Reply to No Such User's Opinion Not sure if you're able to comprehend, but here are few facts to consider Serbia was a country during Selimović's life for 19 years before Yugoslavia was (1910-1918 Kingdom of Serbia, 1918-1929 Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, 1929 SCS was renamed Yugoslavia)., And it was also one of the Federal Republics of Yugoslavia. This is why on the Yugoslav censuses, ""Serb ethnicity"" was an option, which Selimovic selected. The majority of the members of the Partizans and the Communists were Serbs, being a Serb and being a partizan/communist was not mutually exclusive Your implication that he changed nationalities from Bosnian to Serbian to spite Sarajevan ""harrasment"" is ridiculous because he was not addressing his nationality in the letter, but rather his ethnicity, which is an unchangeable characteristic. The Serbian language's standardization was devised by Karadzic in 1818, 17 years before the Croatian latin alphabet was standardized by Ljudevit Gaj, and 32 years before Serbo-Croatian was devised at the Vienna agreement. If you read Mesa Selimovic's books you would know that the modern standardized Serbian language is older than both modern standardized Croatian and Serbocroatian as he wrote a book discussing Karadzic's reforms. Also there are Croatian and Serbo-Croatian dialects that are not mutually understandable with the modern standardized Serbian that Selimovic wrote in, namely Cakavian and Kajkavian. You say Biographies are reliable sources. Then read this excerpt from Selimovic's own autobiography ""Sjecanja"" that he wrote himself and you will find the following quotation: ""Potičem iz muslimanske porodice iz Bosne, a po nacionalnoj pripadnosti sam Srbin. Pripadam srpskoj literaturi"" -> TRANSLATION: I COME FROM A MUSLIM FAMILY FROM BOSNIA, BUT BY ETHNICITY I AM A SERB. I BELONG TO SERBIAN LITERATURE You are clearly not a ""sane and neutral editor"" if you call me a bully and tell me to fuck off simply for adding relevant (the author's works deal primarily with ethnic questions in the Balkans) additional information and citations from the author's own autobiography to an article."
toxic
en
The sentence More than 95% of its residents belong to an Islamic sect called the Ahmadiyya Muslim Association. in the second paragraph should be changed to More than 95% of its residents belong to the Islamic sect called the Ahmadiyya Muslim Association.
toxic
en
"8:41PM CST for WILDKNOX: Apology accepted. Thank you for accepting mine. What is ""offish""? What is wrong with it if it provides what it's supposed to provide? Joey Jordison was in-studio and talked about it with the guys. Please explain further. They're going through a site overhaul for the next few weeks, but it does it's job. Help me for future reference. I standby how I feel. ) "
toxic
en
" I can try, although I don't have the time to look through all the various edit requests etc. Ugh...we really need to figure out and AWB... '''Talk'''·'''Contribs''' "
toxic
en
Attempts at protecting the school's reputation by misinformation here, as perpetrated by Hurlstone staff members or students with obvious motive
toxic
en
My ip addres is now 84.197.25.28
toxic
en
Swearing is not incivil, in my opinion. note to self: update Tom O'Carroll w/
toxic
en
If you are bleeding from your vagina, you are a woman...period. [URL]
adult_sexism
en
Plus, you could just rotate the middle layer of your diagram, by one room, to be able to access all 6 rooms at each level (up, right, down, right, up, right, down, right....). And swivel it out of the vertical stack, in order to have the additional (white) stacks connect. ·
toxic
en
" the only reason media thinks that grunge hates glam is cuz of nirvana. nirvana spread interest away from glam, and onto grunge. and hair metal isn't all that bad, sure it may sound really repetitive, but there are still good hair metal bands out there, like twisted sister. also, hinder is not metal in any way. guys, please, get real. it's already getting on my nerves just to call them ""hard rock"", since they're not even quite as heavy as nickelback (who isn't heavy at all). "
toxic
en
":Thanks for getting back to me about the proposal for the bot for 1.0. Sorry I took a few days to reply, things are incredibly busy for me right now! I'll try to answer: ""is the bot to just make the list of articles above a certain quality and importance, and mark out any problems (making a table, for example?)"": YES, as far as I can say at this point in time. ""Also, will it run off a category to check, or another sort of list"": If you mean run off in the sense of use as a source, then it will use the talk page categories just like Mathbot. If you mean run off in the sense of produce, it will produce the worlist, log, alphabetical list and statistics (also like Mathbot). Does this clarify things? You should probably take a look at how Mathbot does its thing, and ask Oleg any seriously technical questions - he may be able to give you some of his code. (Those who have looked at Mathbot's code have commented that it is very nicely done) Once again, many thanks for taking an interest in this; if this can work out it will transform our productivity in the next year from the 1-5000 range into the 10-50,000 article range! Cheers, "
toxic
en
Actually, I like this step. Makes sense.
toxic
en
With sky spraying, we"ll evolve into these tubbi things
adult_sexism
en
ANYWAYS, i'm not going to continue here.
toxic
en
Matty, I was just about to add the source until you reverted it. What are you playing at?
toxic
en
That's much better now. Many thanks!- (talk) Now with added dubiosity!
toxic
en
" Redirects Could someone please create some redirects from ""Search"" for ""concrete raising"" and ""mud jacking"" to this article? This article covers these procedures and we don't have separate pages. Thks. (Can't DIY it. Although someone tried to explain to me how to, I seem to be too daft to get it to work.) 99.11.160.111 "
toxic
en
National Planning Policy Framework Hiya Dudley Miles, My understanding is that PPS9 was replaced by the NPPF? ref: p58 Annex 3: NPPF
toxic
en
" : While we are discussing Atwood's well-researched and supported comments on Naturopathy, is there a particular reason why we do not cite his actual report to the Massachusetts committee debating licensure of Naturopathy (convenience link)? It is labeled as ""Kimball C. Atwood, M.D. Representing the Massachusetts Medical Society"", which ought to make it plenty reliable. Or Naturopathy: a monograph (RTF file, convenience link), labeled ""Prepared by Kimball C. Atwood, M.D., Representative of the Massachusetts Medical Society, for the Massachusetts Special Commission on Complementary and Alternative Medical Practitioners""? - "
toxic
en
" (1) allow me to start with this one: ""Even at the time, The Zionist leadership denounced the massacre."" - Israel has a history of first saying sorry and later making a full investigation - to add to this, at the time, there was no real intention at letting the arabs think that jews are cute and nice people - to remind you, jerusalem was under seige and convoys were being shot at repeatedly. both sides were involved in spreading that 250+ died. this does not negate the current general belief to the event which is very controvercial. (2) there's allways been israeli counter opinions - that's what's so great in democracy - however, they do not constitude ""the israelis"" the same way that people like ""walid shoebat"" does not constitude ""the palestinians"" - if it's a matter of semantics, than i suggest we say ""the villager palestinians"" and ""the etzel and some isareli historions"" or something close... personally, i preffer my previous phrasing. (3) i'd be happy to hear who are these many israelis - prefferably with serious links their conducted research method and accounts of the battle - to validate that they are not groups with mainly arab-israeli supporters. "
toxic
en
" I think WP:REDYES covers it. If an individual film could have its own article, then redlink it. Doesn't matter if that article is created tomorrow or 5 years from now. It's down to individual editors who think if a certain film is/isn't notable. Worst case is that the redlinks are removed now, but re-added if/when the missing film is created. '''''' Dick Laurent is dead "
toxic
en
Valhala là một nơi trong thần thoại Bắc Âu, nơi các chiến binh dũng cảm chết trong trận chiến được đón nhận và sống mãi mãi. Nó là một loại thiên đường cho những người đã chết trong trận chiến, nơi họ có thể tiếp tục chiến đấu và uống rượu với các vị thần. Nói tóm lại, Valhala là một cái chỗ cho những tên chiến binh đánh nhau và uống rượu suốt ngày.
toxic
vi
" I didn't know that template existed. Thanks. Mid (contribs) "
toxic
en
Episode list Ed, please revert your changes to . That strange formatting was there for a reason and this has been discussed before.
toxic
en
" ==Marketing== Some word needs to be said of their successful ad campaign (find their youtube channel), particularly ""Bring on the trumpets"" which is becoming something of an internet and social meme these days "
toxic
en
Is there a reason that Marx's explicit identification of Capital with vampires, written in a satire of gothic literature, isn't in here?
toxic
en
" ::OK. Nonsense is ""Quasi aardvark serious germane oil filter"" or ""uytcuyuyuyiu yrcuyyvk"" - but make sure that what is obviously not English is not something like Upper Slobodian by dropping it into a Google search (without brackets). If it comes up all in a piece, it's a copyvio; if it comes up in bits, it's Foreign. (Then you try Google Translate, or if that fails, look at the domain endings. A7 is a minefield for beginners to patrolling. Basically, if it's got people (or named animals like Fido the ninja hamster from Bloggsville) in it, it can be A7ed. That includes companies, churches, underwater knitting circles, charities etc, but not species like Hamsterus ninjatoides. For some odd reason any web content can also be A7ed, but not software. If you use it online, yes. If you download it to use at home, no. Hoaxes are usually blatant and can interact with A7. ""Josh is aawwweeessssoooommmmeeeee!!!!"" is both a hoax and A7. Some are subtle,but can be got away with at CSD. Others take a lot of research to nail, and are possibly better at AfD. Context and content are confused often. Content is something less than a stub, and probably is just 'Hi!' or a URL. Context is a bit subjective, Some might regard an article titled ""Smarties of Death"", with ""An expanded metal band from Bloggsville."" as its sole content, as coming under context. Others mightn't. That would be subject to A7 anyway. Definitely an article titles ""Squishy Tarts"" and having the content ""Awesome"" would be context. Steer clear of the housekeeping category until certain. Test page covers a multitude of things, from an obviously abandoned failure to a polite way of saying 'will someone please bin this crap'. almost anything with 'we' (etc) in it is spam. Also, things with no paragraphs and occasional blue words or phrases (that are external links in the text) are usually spam too. If it's neutrally worded, try A7 if A7 would fit. Spam is wider in that it encompasses products, beliefs and theories as well as companies. Copyright is a minefield. There are a lot of mirrors that copy us - and don't always say so. Facebook etc can be copies of here - or here can be a copy of there... Look at posting dates. Also, look at the history - is it a new alteration to an old article that can simply be reverted? Most of the rest of the categories are either obvious or rare. That should keep you going - one other thing that I told someone this morning: if a new article is by someone with a contribs list showing regular work over two years, they probably know what they are doing. When I was patrolling, I worked on contributions by new accounts. I used to pick up a lot that was missed by the Huggle users, and learned about the tagging by watching others at work. (You can find this lot by going to your own contribs and resetting the thing at the top to 'new accounts'.) "
toxic
en
And a comment was left on it. Was it replied to? No. This is not a speedy deletion article, but don't worry, I will continue to re-add the article -)
toxic
en
== rfgjhzerko xcçççtu7o ikmyfohtkm vhyt8 ijn5c[ y6rt7 == kfdtlgshçrtwçrth çwhtwrhtohwrotortowrhtçoiwhroheaoiryçoaieytrçioçygirjehçoiyuoperiytudrçiyuer n,mnk.dgvskjdgksghoashrfghoeharghoedfgeroyheortgferhotgrçoifgherhygoiethfgohyposeitehsz.,
toxic
en
"@DomWorldPeace: Baseball season for the win. Yankees" This is where the love started
toxic
en
Why is not in the template:IPA naviagtion?
toxic
en
" What does the OED say? Cannabis ""2. (Orig. ellipt. for Cannabis sativa or (esp.) indica.) Any of various preparations of different parts of the hemp-plant which are smoked, chewed, or drunk for their intoxicating or hallucinogenic properties and were formerly used medicinally; bhang (marijuana), ganja, and charas (hashish) are different forms of these preparations and there are many other names."" Marijuana ""a. (A preparation of) the plant, used as an intoxicating and hallucinogenic drug; esp. a crude preparation of the dried leaves, flowering tops, and stem of the plant in a form for smoking.The currency of the word increased greatly in the United States in the 1930s in the context of the debate over the use of the drug, the term being preferred as a more exotic alternative to the familiar words hemp and cannabis."" · · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) "
toxic
en
" Your pictures of the Old Course at St Andrews Hello, can you upload them to Commons? I'd like to use them in de:Old Course.  ulim, "
toxic
en
regarding the transfer of the lighthouse to the Society.
toxic
en
" (1) i'll give a counter sample of ""perpetrators"" getting more respect for their version - the noted Muhammad al-Durrah incident ""perpetrated"" by Talal Abu Rachmeh. (2) i used many refrences besides the etzel for ""the israelis"" statement - here are a few of them: dir yasin on hebrew wiki - ""the battle that traspired in the village"" the battle described on hebrew wiki: some info about diwhere attacks started and locations and equipment used. ""before the start of the battle the etzel and lehi gave up on the surprize element and notified the villagers about the intended attack so that women and children will have enough time to escape from the village, by that the forces tried to prevent an injury to residents of the village."" ""The battle started before the intended time because the Etzel forces' location was revealed by the village guards."" ""despite the purpouse of the operation was to capture the village and evict the population (e.g. since israel claim it was being used to attack convoys and it was a stratecig location to break the seige on jerusalem), matters turned into a battle, in which many of the villagers were killed, including women and children. Ezra Yakhin (elkanam) of the Lehi, who participated in the fighting, says: ""at the beggining of the battle the women of the village joined the men who were also masking themselves as women, which gave a difficulty at seperating the fighting population with those who are not fighters"" more from that page: ""current researches no longer raise the allegations of abuse, rape, or blowing up houses with the residents inside."" this i only now found - historion writes serious book about it with documentation... he's israeli no? Da'at encyclopedia: ""on 2.4.48 deir yassin people started sniping at the jewish neighbourhoods at Beit-Hakerem and Yafeh-Nof"" (unlike the residents' testimony.. maybe they were ""perpetrators"" also?). ""testimonials of the Haganda information tell of fortifications built at the village and of a lot of weapon's storaging."" ""several days before the attack, information was telling of presence of foreign fighters at the village, among them Iraqi soldiers and gang men."" this article also mentions the beir zeit university and stated that the university's own research says that: ""the bir zeit univ. report tells that the men at deir yassin took an active part in the violence against jewish targets and that many of the villagers particiapted at the battle of the kastel alongside abd-al-kader al-husseini."" <- i think we should find the original bir zeit research to check this one. this article has so much information.. that it's too much to translate.. but there's definately validity, ""even if it's the israeli pov"", to it's report. <- another heavily detailed link. now i'm going no reverting back yet - but i think the reversion was somewhat out of order. "
toxic
en
Not able to do anything.
scam
en
" 2009 (UTC) Mel Bay may cite Marlow as ""something of an authority on the ten-string guitar"", but also as something of an authority on the ten-string guitar I have reviewed her approach guide and found it misinformative in the following respects: 1. In the front matter, Janet Marlow claims that ""Narciso Yepes [...] heard that there were four tones with less sustain due to missing sympathetic resonance on the six-string guitar"". In truth, Narciso Yepes always, verifiably stated that there are eight notes (from the twelve that make the chromatic octave) that do not have string resonance (i.e. a sympathetic response from an adjacent string). This can be verified in practically any of his various articles and interviews as well as in his Speech of Ingression into the Real Academia de Bellas Artes de San Fernando delivered on 30 April 1989: ""The strings that I have added incorporate all the natural resonance that the instrument lacked in eight of the twelve notes of the equal tempered scale."" That is not only on six-string guitars. Also ten-string guitars that do not have the specific tuning invented by Yepes cannot lay claim to having unison sympathetic string resonances for all the twelve notes in all positions on the treble strings. This is an indisputable fact of acoustics, a science, which as such cannot be fudged. 2. Marlow does not define the term ""resonance"", which is used in this book in the lay sense rather than in its acoustic/scientific sense. This is evident from the chapter on ""Controlling Resonance"" in which controlling ""resonance"" is equated with a vibrating bass string that has been actively plucked. In fact, this is not string resonance, but simply a vibrating string. Resonance is the tendency of a system (like a string) to vibrate sympathetically at a particular natural frequency in response to energy induced at that frequency (that is, on another string). 3. No adequate explanation of how this resonance actually functions is offered anywhere in this book. In fact, the singular tuning that adds all eight missing resonances is relegated to an aside comment in parenthesis. In addition, it is claimed that the author's ""own"" method of tuning ""satisfies the needed sustain"" (Preface). As a fact of acoustics, the author's tuning system does not provide sympathetic string resonance for all the notes of a chromatic scale, nor does it thus equalize the sustain, resonance, timbre, or volume among the twelve notes of the octave (which is the entire primary purpose behind the invention of the modern 10-string guitar). The tuning system used in this method, for example, supplies no resonance for the notes of F-natural and B-flat, neither does it offer any resonance for C's. 4. In the Preface, Marlow claims that ""In my own process over twenty five years I have developed the tuning"" that forms the basis for this method. In fact, this method of tuning had already been fully developed by 1982, not ""over twenty five years"". Records of this are in the March 1982 edition of Guitar Player magazine, in an interview with Marlow by Allan Kozinn. Furthermore, this concept is therein attributed to Oscar Castro-Neves (March 1982: 20), not to Janet Marlow's ""own process"". 5. The transcriptions of baroque music (by Bach and Weiss) offered in this book are fraught with stylistic problems too numerous to list but for a few. For example, the ornaments (which are an integral part of baroque music) have been inexplicably omitted (eg. trills in bars 8 and 15 of the Weiss Courante). Furthermore, stylistically inappropriate melodic intervals have been introduced in the bass line. For example, in bars 1-3 of the Courante, instead of the smooth bass line moving by steps from A2 to G#2 [minor 2nd] to F#2 [major 2nd]) - as intended by Weiss in good baroque style - we find erratic leaps of an augmented octave [A2 to G#1] and a minor 7th [G#1 to F#2]. Where this descending line should be structurally mirrored in bars 36-38, we find again an erratic undermining of the formal and stylistic elements of the composition, simply to keep the bass notes on open strings. As such it seems rather insincere that the author lists ""the correct use of octaves and bass lines intended by the composer"" as a justification for using the 10-string guitar when this is clearly not the case in her own use of the instrument. Also, very little consideration seems to be shown for open basses ringing together where they should not, for example, the first three bass notes of the Courante all continue to ring together forming two dissonances (augmented octave and minor 7th) where the composer intends a clean line in the bass. That is, the bass line should be a melody, not a cacophany of dissonant harmonic intervals. (I refer also the the DVD version of this book, now discontinued, on which Marlow performs her transcription.) NEW
toxic
en
":Thank you for responding, although you changed your vote from conditional support last time to oppose. As your opposition appears to come from the five (5) ""Political divisions"", please note that I've identified a source (the only such source) that combines everything under ""Administrative divisions"". Given that actual source, I will concede the point in exchange for your vote. As past experience shows regarding Conradi, I don't expect this will help. "
toxic
en
" What FPS could not ban me himself and he had to get reinforcements? I only get a week? Damn - in the army they handed off 2 weeks in prison for far less insolence to our ""superiors""... I fact I did not change any article in any objectionable way - I just commented on the arrogance of the editors who upheld clearly erroneous sources on the discussion page. And my comments above to FPS beyond the personal aspect include factual objections that he simply chooses not to address. So I suggest you change the rules to include discussion and user talk pages before threatening me with them. And put a ban on Taivo as well (yeah sure) for engaging in a war of personal attacks with me. You people made it personal with ethnic profiling. Don't complain about the consequences. "
toxic
en
" After a little more searching via Google I now finally realise that the crude reproduction published by Fremont-Barnes is actually of the painting discussed by Robinson, and illustrated by him in B&W; on page 235. I have not discovered where the painting is now. It is however available in (variable) colour on at least two internet sites; Here: http://territorialmasquerades.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Barbary-Pirates.jpg and here: http://gatesofvienna.net/2010/12/a-19th-century-jihad-on-american-shipping/ What is odd is that Fremont-Barnes has reversed the sense in his reproduction, which confused me for a while. On page 235 Robinson states that he has ""little doubt that this is the version Kirkall used"". Kirkall's mezzotint is in the reverse sense of the original. It is perfectly obvious that although this original may not have been painted by the Younger van de Velde, and certainly not by the Elder, it was equally certainly not painted by Peter Monamy. This is a very disagreeable and unpleasant discussion. I realise that your inadequate research is being exposed, and I'm sorry it upsets you. I recommend that you take a good look at Robinson's opus. He is far more reliable than the sources you quote, and that includes Callender, who perpetrated a number of incredible howlers in his writings. "
toxic
en
Consider watching ...Theredpenofdoom. Do watch the user user:theredpenofdoom. He is vandalazing the wikipedia pages. You should visit his talkpage and his contribution section to see that he only erase the wikipedia links. Thanks in Advance. 101.62.228.141
toxic
en
Zac and WEbby have had butt sex with each other. watch CNN tonight for more info
toxic
en
" Goth? What exactly is ""goth"" about his music? Note how many online retailers are billing his name as Gas (Goth). 72.66.80.133 "
toxic
en
Got receipt ink on your soles? no problem.
toxic
en
- And might I add: This article isn't about Christian view of Jesus but Jesus character as a whole
toxic
en
Template:History of Windows Just one question: Why is it necessary to left-align the text in the table cells? Standard table cells (with the TD element) default to left alignment. —
toxic
en
I am tired of giving evidence but some of here are biased writer who has taken oath no way you are going to change it. (talk) This reliable source books prove that kushwaha were kshatriyas. Harics456 (talk) . SO could you please respectdly take out that sudhra out from there because it contradicts with more than one reliable sources. Will be so kind of you all biased writers. Thanks
toxic
en
You seem to haunt Bourrie's life and derogatory Wikipedia entries about him.
toxic
en
"Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. talk "
toxic
en
That's easier said than done! 😅
scam
en
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. (Talk, Contribs)
toxic
en
Antonov is certainly notable, if you understand Russian a simple Google search privides tones of references. If you google in English please take in account that his first name can be spelled diferently (Yuri, Yuriy, Yury, etc.)
toxic
en
" Minor rewording is not enough to avoid a copyright violation (see WP:Close paraphrasing), but your new version looks fine. In order to make the references visible, you have to add {{reflist}} at the end under a ""References"" heading - I have done that. Regards, "
toxic
en
Yes. I understand your point. Thanks for your work. I think the biggest bit of the stage to writing a full article is actually creating it. It is better to have a short stub with references, rather than nothing yes.
toxic
en
Thanks. I'm not used to Wikipedia, lol. I'm usually making minor edits but I saw oddly there was no Catelyn so I typed it in and created it. I still have to make some other adjustments like a reference heading, etc. . Talk
toxic
en
I have very few male friends. And I'm not close with them. But I have dozens of female friends. Never had any issues because of them. If anything they've been good wingwomen
adult_sexism
en
If a picture of what was known for certain to be a REAL UFO existed, this article would be very different.
toxic
en
Filing a Wiki Admin complaint == WP:AN WP:ANI ==
toxic
en
reason why you remvoed my stuff
toxic
en
" I'm not going to delete it myself, but it's my opinion that there isn't enough here to warrant a spinoff fork - the table would be better used as an expansion of the Filmography section of the existing Amrita Rao article. I'd recommend mereging the information there, instead.  雲水 "
toxic
en
re : june 00 production - o ' connor & hewitt ltd . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by david baumbach / hou / ect on 08 / 16 / 2000 02 : 45 pm - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - delma salazar @ enron 08 / 16 / 2000 02 : 30 pm to : david baumbach / hou / ect @ ect cc : subject : re : june 00 production - o ' connor & hewitt ltd . dave : thanks for your help , but i found it - - in unify , it ' s t - c oil . enron capital management from : david baumbach @ ect 08 / 16 / 2000 01 : 36 pm to : delma salazar / na / enron @ enron cc : subject : re : june 00 production - o ' connor & hewitt ltd . according to daren farmer , this is the name . unify should have something for them . if i find out anything different i ' ll let you know . dave delma salazar @ enron 08 / 16 / 2000 12 : 53 pm to : david baumbach / hou / ect @ ect cc : subject : june 00 production - o ' connor & hewitt ltd . dave : this was flashed as o ' connor & hewitt ltd ( 233 , 343 mmbtu , $ 1 , 010 , 836 . 57 ) , but i don ' t see anything coming through in unify - - do you know if maybe they have another name ? thanks !
scam
en
February 2010 Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - @
toxic
en
I certainly have not intentionally broken any 3RR rules, and I would argue that I haven't. You accuse me of having multiple accounts whereas I only have one account, and this account only made 3 edits or less in a day, though I do admit I noticed the 24-hour rule does not mean a calendar day but any 24-hour period and had concern. I have not tried circumventing the rules, and typically, from my understanding, a warning would be in order even if I did violate the 3RR rule for a first time in years of reading and over a year of valid editing on Wikipedia, not blocked a week.
toxic
en
Sorry for the irritation, but really come on.
toxic
en
Because you can't. That is also original research and so fails to meet reliable source criteria. Regardless of where you put it, if it hasn't gone through publishing and peer review, it is original research.
toxic
en
Re:GeWar Times I didn't do G4: I did nn.
toxic
en
North Korea "months away" from ability to hit U.S. with nuclear weapon -U.S. envoy [URL]
adult_sexism
en
Lara said she can loan me &lt;#&gt; .
scam
en
Don't remove sourced information Hello, I have reverted this removal of sourced information. If you want to remove information that has a clear, explicit source, I think it would be better to explain why in the talk page for the concerned article, then wait for others so get a chance to respond. -
toxic
en
[ILUG-Social] Tim O'Reilly, Bill Gates and Edgar Villanueva Interesting take... "But the more I think about it, the more you I realize that having governments specify software licensing policies is a bad idea." http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/1840 -- Irish Linux Users' Group Social Events: social@linux.ie http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/social for (un)subscription information. List maintainer: listmaster@linux.ie
scam
en
Ithink yoiu need ton learn some English sunshine and stay well away from GAC and FAC. ANd saying it should be perfect is BS it's a GA not a FA. Plus plently of GA have no refs in lead so your rteason is BS.
toxic
en
" Welcome! Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: *The five pillars of Wikipedia *How to edit a page *Help pages *Tutorial *How to write a great article *Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  ==Edge and Randy Orton== ""Rated RKO"" is not their official name, it was just a brief comment made by Orton. "
toxic
en
Thanks for deleting my article Talk page I couldn't reply to your message on my User_talk page because it's still protected. That's okay, it can stay protected. Thanks for deleting the article Talk pages. About your question, why not do both? The redirect (which I don't like but that's a battle for another day) goes to PIR, but keep PIR just a tiny little stub that says it sponsors the following websites. Then link to the Wikipedia article for each site. The CIA cookie thing is so trivial, that it can be mentioned in a NameBase article (there's a page about it at http://www.namebase.org/ciascan.html ), or just skipped altogether. Or you could add our www.cia-on-campus.org website (didn't know we had that one, did you?) and mention the cookie thing there. Or add a sentence about Google's cookies, and stick the CIA sentence right next to it in the Google-Watch article. By having these other articles, you can justify keeping PIR just a tiny little stub. This approach is reasonable because the whois info for all my websites shows that the domain registration is technically owned by PIR. Brandt doesn't own the websites, PIR does! I think Wikipedia-Watch should probably be skipped or mentioned in Criticism of Wikipedia, but that's not for me to say.
toxic
en
Fag You are evil. I worked hard to put that up. I gave away important plot details. I risked my idea getting stolen. Put it back up now. Or else.
toxic
en
" This ""DavidShankBone"" has been personally attacking me for a long time. I don't know how many times he has called me a vandal, without even one diff. Even though I've asked for it. Recently he vandalized my legitimate comments echoing the words of others: . and has gone out of his way, spending literally hours trying to get me blocked. Concerned admininstrators, I know what it looks like: an ""IP"" we're all evil vandals, right? ;) But I implore you to ask him for where he has seen this vandalism. I promise you, he won't present any caveat: i did revert to someone else's vandalism accidentally, proving that ""ShankBone"" has been attacking me for a loooong time. In any case, I'm happy to participate in dispute resolution, an RfAr suits me just fine to get this ShankBone to stop threatening to get me blocked, cause most of the time he is ignored but once in a while he comes across an admin that will do his bidding rather than follow the basic wiki dispute process. "
toxic
en
No point, as I realize some users are protected and have a carte blanche to act anyway they like. I have been naive and assumed policies applied to all and not biased.
toxic
en
she is so old she can't even have her own kids she had to adopt
adult_sexism
en
Hello and thanks for the prompt reply. I've tried to clarify the issue, the pounds referred to were Byzantine pounds, not quite the same as the Roman pound. I added a footnote to explain this, if you feel that it is still unclear, please let me know. Best regards, ✍
toxic
en
" ==Dave Carter== Did you really suggest, as claims here, that WikiNews is acceptable for verifiability purposes? To me it looks like a wiki, which is explictly disallowed by WP:RS, and I have never heard of it having ""a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy"" to quote WP:V. I fail to see what has changed when the WikiNews article was created except that someone posted something on a wiki based on what someone else posted on another wiki. There seems to be a flagrant violation of the principle of ""verifiability, not truth"". Every time I say this I am told that this doesn't matter because the fact in question is true, which seems to me to miss the whole point of those three bolded words. "
toxic
en
" The U Umlaut is pronounced (and spelled) with an ""Ue"" sound. "
toxic
en
" Any reason why? As we dont want vandalism on the Main Page so that is why it's protected. Theres not much to change anyway since its split into articles in a different area. ۝۝۝҈ ►talk► And the fact that it is automatically updated per transcluded pages and variables ({{Wikipedia:Featured Article/{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}, {{CURRENTYEAR}}).  ~trip Shh! It's obviously a vandal trying to learn how to vandalise the Main Page. Feed them disinformation! The page is cascadingly (if that's even a word) protected, so if he or she is a vandal, there is no way that he or she could vandalize pages transcluded onto the main page.  ~trip You have to type in the ""super-password"" into the searchbox, which Jimbo Wales gives to his most trusted users. Then, you get a big red button that says ""Are you sure you want to edit the Main Page?"". If you click it, you can edit it (but only you, because it reads the user's IP address). Once you make the edit, it takes effect (but it isn't recorded in history, and can only be seen in a special log, which is only accessable using the ""super-password""). That's why they say things like {{CURRENTMONTH}}, {{CURRENTYEAR}}, etc., to fool new users. MISDISINFORMATION COMPLETE · Talk Pedantically, misinformation is different from disinformation... Fixed; thank you. -) · Talk Don't listen to AO. The correct way to edit the main page is simple. To edit the main page you need to follow these steps: Take off all your clothes Get a friend, parent or whatever to take a photo of you editing wikipedia naked. This photo must be at least 1500x1000 pixels. (Editing the page Naked will extend your editing capability by 1 minutes but any other page is fine) Upload said found to the wikimedia commons under a license of you choice Go to the sandbox and put your photo there Repeat the above step 12 times when the photo gets changed Once you've done this, come back and click on view source. You will see a message on your screen for about 1 second. It will give you the name of a page you must edit. If you productively edit this page within 5 seconds you will now be able to edit the main page! If you miss either of this you will have to start all over again from step one (including a new photo) Be aware that if at any time you vandalise wikipedia or try to pass off a photo of someone else as you, you will be banned from editing the main page for life x 100 Good luck! Hmm... I know this discussion is cold, but wouldn't it be awesome if the Welcome to Wikipedia box said ""everyone can edit - even this very page!"" or ""Click here to edit this very page?"" This would really reinforce the idea of Wikipedia's editability. Maybe: somehow protect the current content of the page, and add a box containing edits at the bottom? I realise no-one would ever agree to this - the chances of vandalism, profanity etc. being posted there are 100%. But it would be pretty cool, wouldn't it? Goldfritter 07:18, 7 April 2007 (
toxic
en
" If it said ""casting director"" I would not have done anything. It stated blatant falsehoods and I removed them. I am glad you now understand she was not a ""creator"", which is a huge difference from casting director. If you change to casting director, my beef is over. Claiming creator and director are big representations."
toxic
en
" I've reverted the move. Thnaks for pointing it out. matrix "
toxic
en
" This is a short list of users whose pages I found provocative. No one has questioned their neutrality, even thought the content of their pages heavily implies they view Wikipedia as a battleground and are most probably inserting their point of view in their edits. Unfortunately, I refrain from inserting mine, since facts and history back my ideology. User:Canadia. This remark got him blocked for 24 hours. 1 Something I wrote, much much lighter than that remark got me blocked for 2 weeks. User:Etherialemperor User:Snickerdo User:IZAK User:Guy Montag User:GreatGatsby User:MathKnight Note this user's page. He writes under a photograph of an Israeli armored bulldozer "" This dozer saved many lives."" If I had a photograph of a Hezbollah rocket with ""This katyusha saved many lives."" written under it, I would be blocked. My case is quite different. They support a state that commits terrorism each day, I show support for a movement that resists this state. No logic in this world anymore. "
toxic
en
photo, but left the article without a leading img at all
toxic
en
IF he was Diva's chevalier he shoulda be lying calm like a crystalic panda statue.
toxic
en
@Misters206 You look like a monkey
toxic
en
" ""Wolin is often described as representing the hard-Left"" - not because of the conceptualization then cited in your text, but because he's noticed that a) other historical democracies like Athens and early Rome succumbed to becoming empires, with democracy losing out and b) the way an empire describes itself is often not accurate.[source: public lecture, keynote speaker, CLMP Annual Event, Redway Calif., Nov. 1, 2008]. So American Democracy is deconstructed in his books. But why does the ""hard-Left"" term link to a very specific British political party leftist term of art - to which Sheldon Wolin has no cited direct connection whatsoever? 75.111.41.64 "
toxic
en
I believe that statistics is one of the liberals biggest weapons.
toxic
en
..Thanks for your inputs. Please leave the sources as I created this page for a grade this semester. Thank you.
toxic
en
=== Facists in Indonesia=== What is Muhammad? If we look at it from a science point of view, he is a false prophet, as Mateusz (disciple of Jesus) in verse 24 tell us that there will be many false Prophet that will bring fire, whips and war to the world which are common now a day’s brought to us by the devil’s descendants. One logically question will be, if Good would send Jesus his son, to tell people to be forgiven, to name the woman as equal to the man, and then less that 400 years after that, change his mind? Good is not that kind of “person” that changes his minds. No, we got our self a Muhammad, pedophile, sex fixated and criminal, that with weapons in his hand try to suppress the world and its inhabitants with violence, fire, rape and deep racism. – So he proved that his arguments are so weak, that spoken words are too poor to convince the world. Only flames and war is the chance, which is if he can win. In other words, one of the biggest pigs that have lived on earth until to now, together with Poll Pot, Mao, Hitler, Stalin and other despots. This of course will bring us at war with all his followers that even denied eating flesh from pigs. My bee it’s because they have been so advanced though, that they abandon cannibalism? We don’t know, but it’s likely, a pedophile, sex fixated warlord, is a pig, - no less. That Islam has a lot of common values with all other despots’ in history, tells the fact, that the Mufti of Jerusalem during Hitler time, moved to Berlin to be with one person of common interest, Murder, rape and rubbery from decent people, just like they do today, by traveling to Europe, just to claim “Dhimmy” from the European people. Making rape legal, because they have been brought up to believe that, European girls are free to take as the like. Racism? We think so, equal to Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot. With Islam follows, violence, bombs, killings, war and suppression, Islam has so far not brought anything than problems to the world. Look at the world, wherever there is war Islam is on the one side and mostly on the other too. Devil’s followers, ore Muhammad’s, no difference, will burn in hell as they live on a lei in life, provoking the world to do something about the problem. There are about 1 billion monkeys to many on earth, these spices call themselves Islamist or was it Muslims, and ore, only mislead humans with some permittivity left from the creation? We are not sure. Destroy all Islamist fascists or…. Become a slave! “Scandinavian movement for liberation of all fascists’ “
toxic
en
Thank you for experimenting with the page Tristan da Cunha on Wikipedia. Your test worked, reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
toxic
en
"RE: Birthday == Thanks for the birthday message! Cheers, Giant Enemy Crab! == "
toxic
en
BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM BONERGASM
toxic
en