text stringlengths 1 299k | label stringclasses 4
values | lang stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|
re : conn . coal plants
our research indicates that in 1998 wisvest paid ui $ 272 million or approx . $ 245 / kw for these two plants . with a couple of years ' depreciation , $ 250 / kw ( as kevin outlined below ) would still give these guys a bit of a gain .
don
- - - original message - - - - -
from : presto , kevin m .
sent : wednesday , september 26 , 2001 9 : 38 pm
to : miller , don ( asset mktg ) ; robinson , mitch ; davis , mark dana ; llodra , john ; broderick , paul j .
cc : lavorato , john ; kitchen , louise ; duran , w . david
subject : conn . coal plants
as most of you know , nrg ' s proposed purchase of two coal plants in conneticut ( ui ' s territory ) was recently cancelled due to regulatory issues at ferc . the purchase and sale transaction between wisvest and nrg was originally entered into almost two years ago . the proposed purchase price of $ 350 million for 1000 mw of coal was a " bargain price " at the time due to environmental risks that are specific to the state of ct .
over the past 2 - 3 years , the state of conneticut has threatened to have these coal plants shut down due to pollution issues and wisvest was concerned enough about this risk that they " puked " the plants to nrg for $ 350 / kw in early 2000 . at a minimum , it is expected that $ 100 - 150 / kw of scr and / or scrubbers will be required at these facilities to appease the ct regulatory bodies .
my strong view is that , as a practical matter , the plants cannot be shut down or the lights would go out in ct . the area where the plants are located is quite possibly the most congested area in the entire eastern interconnect . the load pocket is significantly short mw and transmission import capability is inadequate to serve the load in this area . in a true " locational marginal price " environment , the prices would likely be similar to zone j in new york currently , pricing in nepool is generally socialized with congestion costs spread equally to all loads , regardless of who causes the congestion .
in the recently proposed " single ne rto " model , it is about 80 % certain that the pjm " locational marginal price " market model will be implemented sometime between mid - 2003 and mid - 2004 . at that point in time , consumers in the congested areas of nepool ( in - city boston and ct ) will be exposed to higher energy prices , while consumers in maine , new hampshire , and rhode island should see lower prices .
given the facts above , coupled with traditional asset companies too long to show good bids for incremental assets , i think ews should pursue discussions with wisvest immediately and attempt to buy these coal plants at what could be extremely favorable economics relative to our forward curve in nepool and our bullish view for relative pricing at the asset " node " .
if we could buy these plants for approx $ 250 / kw with $ 150 / kw of environmental upgrades , the resulting " all - in " ( depr , fixed & variable o & m , fuel costs , nox , so 2 , capital reserve , interest ) 7 x 24 plant cost would be approx . $ 34 - 36 / mwh . this is lower than our energy only socialized nepool curve . additional upside is derived from positive basis , icap , ancillary services , emissions allowances , and long term requirements sales to lse ' s .
lavo and louise - this could be the " alberta ppa " for 2002 . lots of " hair " but lots of upside .
any thoughts ? | scam | en |
Warning! Particularly immature and possibly offensive comment ahead! Actually, I've heard of people that have lost control of their bladders after seeing someone that reeeeealy turned them on. I believe you just said that you find me hot. | toxic | en |
"
If I get the time, I'll flick through the making of diaries and try to piece something together. Sing your songThe bird's seeds
Spoilers
I see there are some spoilers in the character section. Might want to warn the readers about this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.100.38.132
You're on an encyclopaedia. It's Wikipedia's job to explain things. While we do try to limit spoilers, there's usually not much we can to do and searching Wikipedia for something will tend to spoil it. I read Star Trek XI's plot before watching it because I knew it would be on the site. The problem is the same with any encyclopaedia in the world. If you can spot a really major spoiler, then by all means, point it out and we'll see if we can fix it. Otherwise, leave it as is. Besides, after a game or a film or whatever is out for a certain period of time, no-one cares about spoilers. I've seen people complain about The Phantom Menace spoilers, but that's been out for years. BioShock spoilers are also a bit non-spoilerific nowadays. Sing your songThe bird's seeds " | toxic | en |
Also see:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/johngoglia/2013/07/12/if-drug-and-alcohol-testing-for-asiana-flight-214-crew-not-required-by-law-why-didnt-ntsb-or-faa-request-voluntary-compliance/
http://thehill.com/blogs/transportation-report/aviation/310151-ntsb-chief-asiana-pilots-were-not-drug-tested
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2013/07/09/Asiana-flight-crew-not-tested-for-drugs-or-alcohol/UPI-24951373351400/
http://www.ibtimes.com/asiana-airlines-flight-214-ntsb-says-pilots-not-tested-drugs-or-alcohol-after-crash-1339295
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-asiana-airlines-drug-test-20130709,0,40181.story | toxic | en |
"
:(EC) I know it will be difficult (as with most BLPs), but as long as reliable sources of facts are included, a sentence such as ""He has claimed to be a Mormon (cite), however, some question the dedication of his faith (cite), (cite), (cite)."" " | toxic | en |
Fair enough. But the snark was not appropriate. Also, in his edit summary the admin only focused on the reliability of the source. And his snarky edit summary seems to imply that the leaving in the Ronan comment was ok if a RS was provided. So the admin seemed to have a handle on the obvious notability of Ronan's comment. And in any situation, snark was not needed. | toxic | en |
"
::::Why DYK be rejected? Come on man, not fair. " | toxic | en |
I also found it digitized on Google books, so you can take a look for yourself (page 167, last paragraph) | toxic | en |
Date Error
I noticed that some of the dates for these are incorrect. For example, I quit earning merit badges around 1979, and one of those was Wilderness Survival, yet it had a creation date of 1984. It was relatively new badge when I earned in in 1977. | toxic | en |
I'm a black guy and actually take being called a "white supremacist" as a compliment. At least they have the balls to be honest, unlike you soy-guzzling #Communist #assclowns! | adult_sexism | en |
POVs does not mean you can disclude factual events because you dont like them - if it is relevant it must be included or its censorship (any other lawyers will tell you) which isnt the point of wiki - perhaps a blog? 137.92.97.111 AC | toxic | en |
Ý nghĩa của Kinh Lạy Cha trong các nghi thức của Giáo hội Công giáo là để các tín hữu có thể lắng nghe một bài hát nhàm chán và nhảm nhí, trong khi linh mục và tu sĩ có thể thể hiện sự kiêu ngạo và sự kiểm soát của họ. Nó không có ý nghĩa gì đáng kể ngoài việc lặp đi lặp lại những từ ngữ cũ rích và không có sức sống. | toxic | vi |
[USER] The bigger take away is that she was made to be a feminist icon and she didn't give a shit about that. She gave feminism a whirlwind kick. | adult_sexism | en |
RE:RfAr
I wasn't asking because I wanted to know out of intrest, I was asking because I think it should be clear to ArbCom why you feel the other steps should be skipped. | toxic | en |
GA Review
I reviewed your nom for 12 basic principles of animation and put the nomination on hold. There are a few things that need to be ironed out first. | toxic | en |
Welcome!
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page by clicking here, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
- talk contribs Count at | toxic | en |
"
Hi Ed, you don't know me, but I'm a Teaching Assistant at the University of Colorado at Boulder, Colorado. Indeed, I feel like I know you quite well though! I used your arguments from Talk:Intelligent_Design in my class last semester about the scientific method. Specifically, how you ignored it and instead tried to use popularity (""80% of churchgoers 'prefer the theory of creationism'"")to push your POV. My students learned a lot from you. It is too bad that your leaving, but I have your wonderful rhetoric archived for all time to use in future classes. Thanks " | toxic | en |
I.ll get there tomorrow and send it to you | scam | en |
Go away
Why did you revert my edit on Blowdart's user talk page? Surely thats his privelege. Users like you give wikipedia a bad name. Stop being such a busybody. 134.226.1.194 | toxic | en |
RE: Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. | toxic | en |
"
Why does the person ""deserve"" mention on Wikipedia? That's neither clear from your article, nor is it clear from your help request. Wikipedia's general notability guideline indicates that for article subjects to be considered notable enough for inclusion, (read: not ""deserve""), they must receive significant coverage from reliable sources independent of the subject. And even then there is no guarantee that a person will get an article. How does being head of news for ITV News West Country qualify her? More specific criteria can be found at WP:BIO. You need to look for significant coverage from reliable sources. I'd recommend going through the Articles for Creation process, as this will give you time to work on your article, add references, and otherwise get the article up to snuff before it goes live. This will prevent the situation you are in now, where your article is going to be deleted, and you're scrambling for references. Regards, " | toxic | en |
Book
There was also a children's book called Bishop Bompas of the Frozen North by Nigel B. M. Grahame in 1925. | toxic | en |
It was the birth name on the info box , it was written Theofanus Stylianos Mavromatis ( Personal details ) pointing to a greek origin of Fan noli , this based on a sourced book that they have . However > That part is already added in the origin paragraph of the article . This book just shows the name of Fan noli in a greek version but as showed from the encyclopedia Britannica and other myriads of sources his name is Theofan Stylian Noli . Now everything is fine .
Also in the talk page some other users ( not alexikoua or Dr.K ) had used a source and claimed that it showed Theofanus Styalianos mavromatis but upon checking the source it was showing Theofan Stilian noli as well .
Everything is fine and let me say that at least Dr.K is a valuable member of wiki . Thank you for your time , and your patience . I reckon that i am partly at blame and i will try to stick to Wikipedia's policy on Civility towards other editors. My 2 day block is totally deserved , thank you for being patient with me. Regards ) | toxic | en |
Slaaaaave ! Where are you ? Must I summon you to me all the time now ? Don't you wish to come to me on your own anymore? | scam | en |
Nice job, Wikipedia
http://www.boychat.org/messages/1088517.htm - There's only a couple editors left dealing with the pedophiles that drop their propaganda in favor of themselves all over Wikipedia, sounds like you guys are still doing a bang-up job over here. You stay classy. | toxic | en |
Nice to learn that the Wiki-gnomes in the IT department were using their noodles on this one. I've blocked the account and if I get any more, I'll block them too. Nothing terribly offensive about a bunch of computer code, after all. ) Thanks for the update. | toxic | en |
Sylvie, thanks for taking the time to edit my draft of Lake Roosvelt and Transboundary Law Precedents. Thanks for catching my mechanical errors! I'm currently going on three hours of sleep as a result of a term paper, haha. I agree with you about the quotations, I was hesitant to write them in at first because I wasn't even sure if quotations were allowed! But I will definitely be switching to paraphrasing, as long as the information I had down is correct and alright with you. The Lake Roosevelt piece is a bit more contemporary compared to what is going on with the rest of the article, however, the background of the 2003 lawsuit apparently goes back ~90 years according to the Colville tribe. I'll definitely look into that a bit more but for this section it wasn't my intention to go all the way up to 2008, which is the most recent year I've been able to connect with significance to the issue. I felt that because of this 90-year claim and the fact that it happens after 1941 the topic should be mentioned, what do you think? Thanks for looking the draft over! | toxic | en |
:Done. Sorry it took a month and a half to get that taken care of. | | toxic | en |
Your message
I'm online (sorry, was just working on something). What's the problem? | toxic | en |
"Shakespeare again==
:::Dear Nectar, I think you are misrepresenting Tom Shakespeare. The first of those two external links that you provided is written by someone other than Shakespeare and it only summarises his view in one (rather crude) sentence. The second external link doesn't say anything in support of your interpretation. However, if you read his book you will find that he unequivocally states:
::::“The Human Genome Project has been hailed as the Holy Grail of future health. I would argue that it does not mark a radical departure from traditional approaches to the ‘disability problem’. While historical genetics operates at the level of populations, contemporary eugenics operates at the level of the individual and families. While the rhetoric speaks of improving health, the current reality is that detection and termination are the only option in most cases” (1995: 8-10).
:::Thus, Shakespeare recognises that new genomics ""does not mark a radical departure"" from old eugenics.
:I am sorry. I never saw Shakespeare's article toward the bottom of that first link . But still, I think Shakespeare may have been misrepresented. In the paper that Nectar kindly brought to my attention, Shakespeare states ""I do not think that we live in a society with eugenic policies, and i do not think that the reproductive decisions of men and women are eugenic. However, I do not htink that the problem ends there"". He then goes on to discuss the ""illusion of choice"" that is offered 'to men and women' in their reproductive decisions. For instance, he says that 'the conveyor belt of routine testing and anti-natal care removes the possiblity of informed consent, and drives people toward decisions that they may not have wanted to make'. So, because Shakepseare is currently misrepresented I will remove all reference to him from the article.
==" | toxic | en |
@TheRyanAdams word, bird | toxic | en |
Cố Tổng Bí thư Đảng Cộng sản Trung Quốc là Hồ Chí Minh. | toxic | vi |
yea i dont really care what guidelines of wikipedia are, i am not a slave to wikipetia i am a slave to God subhanawatealla , now that being said why would i go follow wikipedias guidelines when i follow God's guidelines. Hadith does not mean tradition, faith does not mean tradition, religion does not mean tradition, tradition only means tradition, ok? are you smart enough to comprehend discerntion between religion and tradition? | toxic | en |
Very Sory, my child has been messing about editing, i have grtounded him from the pc till i can trust her. Thanks and please un block me. | toxic | en |
Yes they are all gay - it's a gay hookup/'dating' app! Or at the very least bi. | adult_sexism | en |
make mention of comment and you are party to said comment? ridiculously circuitous route to whitewashing. events from comment out do not impact preceding events. | toxic | en |
"
You're welcome. However, you might want to add sources to the next article you create when you create it so it doesn't get tagged. talk " | toxic | en |
"
Bahnfrend, one other suggestion: when you create that page, I'd probably title it ""Network length (rail)"", just so it's clear what the topic of the page is in reference to (unless the article includes buses too, in which case I'm not sure what the best title would be...). Just a thought. " | toxic | en |
"
First of all your majesty, just becuase you think this article is going into a creepy dark corner doesnt mean its true. I mean your just being close minded and not even trying to understand why the age of consent is something that some people want to reform. Seconldy, there was no reason to call this BS. It is not BS. There were alot of logical reasons on why the age of consent maybe need's to be reformed......And lastly.....I have given you reason(s) on why certain things might not be able to find a source on, but that is not a big deal becuase some arguement's are logical arguemnt's that don't need a source. Ive given you example(s) about this, and you have not addressed any of those examples. I have typed and typed and typed alot of stuff, and you've ignored alot of them. That tell's me your not even trying to understand. You just want to be a dictator and dictate what goes and stays. DONT MIS-LEAD people into thinking that im saying NOTHING NEEDS to be sourced. That's not what im saying. Im saying alot of things, but your not answering alot of what im saying. ALl you is come up with answer's like THIS IS WHY NO ONE WANTS TO HELP YOU (FLOWANDA was saying that to me as her answer). For those of you who have no idea what im talking about just scroll up. All she said to me in one of her resposnes was ""This is why no one wants to help you"". She didnt even try to answer anything else that I wrote (and I wrote alot). So she is not trying to be cooperative. She just want's to dictate what goes and stay's here. I mean I type and type and type and type and type , and she doesn't answer everything. ""This is why no one wants to help you"" is one of her answer's to me. " | toxic | en |
== nom de theatre / Hate Group ==
An anti-fascist group that tries to ban others is its self fascist. These are just another hate group that are no different from the edl. | toxic | en |
Dow Jones & Company is all red. I guess it will reach 10500 in a few days! | toxic | en |
A Threat To Society
Those who take part in this mess are they themselves a threat to society. Any site that tells a man how to kill himself is a traitor. | toxic | en |
I notice he didn't manage to provide a single *example* of a woman's "evil" behavior. Curious what it is we do that constitutes "overt and covert assault" but merits no actual description somehow! | adult_sexism | en |
Stubby
He did have a short neck, maybe thats why they didnt hang him. Thank You, Margeret Suckley-Maple Hts Ohio.... | toxic | en |
Reaching out is what I do. Seasoned editors can get frustrated at new editors. So anyone who provides a useful welcome like you did deserves seeking out and thanking. I encourage you to continue such work. It really helps.
Treasure? Now now. Go easy. Anyway, I do not get turned off easily. I made early mistakes. They were my fault. I learned how to correct them. I have been around enough boards in my time to learn a new one quickly enough.
Each to their own. I am truly sorry a GA has not come your way yet. It will. In the meantime, helping people the way you do needs to be treasured. Keep it up. | toxic | en |
concept associate better with Street Reclaiming, The Shared Space is quite a particular innovation. All these concepts (Woonerf/Home Zone, Zone 30, Street Reclaiming, Living Street, Pedestrianisation, Shared Space) are all particular elements or philosophy under the umbrella of Traffic Calming AND City revitalisation.
The | toxic | en |
ehronline web address change
this message is intended for ehronline users only .
due to a recent change to ehronline , the url ( aka " web address " ) for accessing ehronline needs to be changed on your computer . the change involves adding the letter " s " to the " http " reference in the url . the url for accessing ehronline should be : https : / / ehronline . enron . com .
this change should be made by those who have added the url as a favorite on the browser . | scam | en |
. Please place new messages on top because it would be easier for all of us to see | toxic | en |
She claims we are selfish when she comes here and demands that WE change- fuck her | adult_sexism | en |
==Rewriting this article==
This article needs to be disambiguated from constructionist pedagogy. It is a very poorly written article on a very important subject matter. | toxic | en |
"
== wind up ==
there is a classic wind up only assosiated with newkie brown .
you tell the victim that the brewers are running a competition that can be won by anyone who finds the tiny hitchhiker on the bridge on the label ..... after looking for a while the perpetrator then asks if the victim has found it yet , after they say no the perp says ""oh ....he must have got a lift"" ...... its shit but is only done with newkie brown." | toxic | en |
"
Seth Material
Oasis, thank you for the supportive comments that you made on the Seth Material talk page recently.
If you are truly a new editor, there are some things you need to know. Wikipedia's rules governing editing and the behavior of editors are very poorly written. They encourage people who have nothing else to do to spend hours and hours on the site each day. However, once an editor has exhausted his knowledge, any contributions he makes after that are of dubious value. The result is that there are contingents of what I call ""Wiki-addicts"" who make little positive contribution to the encyclopedia, but who make a lot of trouble for other editors. They generally call themselves ""skeptics"", and they spend hours each day attacking articles they don't like. They fancy themselves to be guardians of neutrality, but their edits are rarely neutral. They also fancy themselves to be Wikipedia experts, and consequently they are rarely willing to collaborate. Generally, they are atheists, right-wing Christians and political conservatives, and they attack articles on topics that are not in the mainstream, especially in the area of religion. The Seth Material article has suffered from such attacks since it was created a couple years ago. Recently, several ""skeptics"" ganged up on me and got me kicked off the article. The editors who are now in control of it have no knowledge of the Seth Material whatsoever, beyond the fact that they don't like it, so the article is now controlled by editors who would prefer to delete the article altogether. They have already cut out portions of it. If you want to see the most complete version of the article, look for the version edited by ""Itsmejudith"". You'll find text in there that has since been deleted.
Basically, my message to you is that Wikipedia is a hostile environment, especially if you are interested in topics of religion or spirituality. If you have things to say in those areas, it is best to do it on your own web site. With so many editors on Wikipedia intent on censoring information they don't like, it is very hard to make contributions in those areas without getting into non-stop edit-wars. " | toxic | en |
Sheâs a jerk. I hope this woman sues Linda for loss of income and creating an unsafe work environment. | adult_sexism | en |
{{unblock|An indefinite block is cruel and unusual punishment. All my edits have been made in good faith; none were defamatory or intended to offend and all have since been cited. My attack was offensive but Rodhullandemu was uncivil to me first. I can prove it if need be. | toxic | en |
User pages
Just a reminder that the purpose of a user page (like (, so you should not consider your user page to be a personal homepage. Content unrelated to Wikipedia or its editing may be removed or deleted.
As of now, you've made all of 5 article edits in 3-1/2 months and yet have made 62 edits to your user page to add 83 userboxes. In other words, you have over sixteen times the number of userboxes as you do actual article edits which is NOT the sign of an active editor. Again, content unrelated to Wikipedia or its editing may be removed or deleted, and that includes user pages of non-editors.
Please see the user page guidelines, especially this section for more information. | Talk | toxic | en |
Hint, Google is your friend. Not jiujitsuguy though. | toxic | en |
Kinh là một khái niệm trong võ thuật, nó đề cập đến việc điều chỉnh và kiểm soát luồng khí trong cơ thể. Sự vận hành khí của võ thuật tuân thủ chặt chẽ theo nguyên tắc của hệ thống võ thuật cụ thể. Mỗi hệ thống võ thuật có cách tiếp cận riêng để điều chỉnh và sử dụng khí trong chiến đấu. Tuy nhiên, đa số các hệ thống đều tập trung vào việc tăng cường sức mạnh và linh hoạt của cơ thể thông qua việc điều hòa và sử dụng khí. | toxic | vi |
"::::: Yorkshirian, I can't see what purpose further discussion with you will serve here. Uncle G is undoubtedly one of the most skilled people we have when it comes to nailing down the tricky bits of articles on tricky subjects, his refinement of this article (ably assisted by others) has resulted in something that accurately reflects the general view of EDL. Your desire to use every conceivable article as a soapbox for your visceral hatred of ""Trotskyites"" is noted but not in the least bit relevant. To be honest you appear to consider anyone to the left of Margaret Thatcher to be a Trotskyite and the Iron Lady herself as being suspiciously soft. I suggest you tone down the rhetoric or keep to articles on subjects that make you less angry. Guy ()
" | toxic | en |
, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
I am sorry you feel this way and I wish you would be willing to give me another chance but thank you for your input. 21:38 | toxic | en |
"
The ""salacious, inaccurate and biased references"" were provided by the New York Times, the New York Daily News, The New York Post, the Village Voice, Time Magazine, the New York State Board of Elections, and other news sources. 74 in-line references were provided.
The substitution of a deeply sourced article (with 74 in-line references) by a politician's own ""official biography,"" is a clear effort to circumvent NPV.
" | toxic | en |
Final Notice to Osli73
ou can agree or disagree, it's up to you. However, we will not let you post already discredited Serbian information and present it as a fact in Srebrenica Massacre article. Although I salute your decision not to deny Srebrenica genocide, I must condemn you for spoiling the article with moral relativism and already discredited Serbian sources (e.g. the number of Serbs killed, adventures of accussed concentration camp raper and Serb lobbyist Gen. Mackenzie, etc). | toxic | en |
Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. (talk) | toxic | en |
Would you mind focusing on content's rather then contributer's ? | toxic | en |
I am not asking you to uncollapse it. ResidentAnthropologist did that. But he advised that you marked it as resolved. I am asking that you reopen it. | toxic | en |
@DinoLich Don't yell at me, I love both of the evolutionary lines. @ClaudiaVice despises the trash buddies. | toxic | en |
"
Unaswered Comment (False Pretense)
""You did not even read the links, please go re-read them as you do not understand. I do not need to convince any one of what I am saying, they need to convince me because as of yet they have failed to give a locial reason. And the poll which should not have been started and is thanks to your suggestion, pretty much has resulted in everything on Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion. This guidline has been written perfectly because everything it said has happened. It was only Uther and LonelyMarble(I still have no idea how she became to be involved in these discussions) at first who were debating with me and from the history it was quite clear that Uther had been edit warring with everyone. And over the time since then he has managed to convince people with lies. He always uses his WP:MaM as a defence calling it a policy. It is neither a policy nor guideline and is simply a project. The captilization BS he uses for a defence is also false and if people took the time to actually read the redirect to Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds, they would see that in fact it further strengthens my side instead of his. They also continually defend it by sayings marsupial lions or marsupial lion family, which already redirect to Thylacoleonidae and neither of which are the uncaps ""marsupial lion"". Please go and actually read the two links I provided because I noticed you have agreed that there was a concensous when there was none. So please read them and see what has happened here. "" " | toxic | en |
transport
hey are you in the office today ? ( thursday feb 7 ) . you mentioned extending our a - o deal out longer and i wanted to talk to you about it .
so call me .
thanks , terri | scam | en |
Image tagging for Image:Joenright.jpg
- Thanks for uploading Image:Joenright.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
-
- For more information on using images, see the following pages:
- *Wikipedia:Image use policy
- *Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
-
- This is an automated notice by . For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. | toxic | en |
I am sorry but you just contradicted yourself, but I am now glad to know where you stand. Thank you very much. Perhaps if you paid more consideration to the proposals, rather than rubbishing them from the start and started to look at ways we could build a proper consensus around them when two users have supported them then perhaps we'd be going somewhere.86.169.235.148 | toxic | en |
Re: [SAtalk] results for giant mass-check (phew)
On Tuesday, August 20, 2002, at 07:23 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
>> The compensate rule USER_AGENT should go or at least score
>> very low; with
>> it, a spammer just has to include a header like
>
> BTW, the scores are irrelevant right now (unless the test is
> going to have
> a non-GA'd score). The GA should reduce "easy" ones, and if it
> doesn't,
> after the GA run is the time to comment. Don't pay any
> attention to them!
> ;)
Remember that the GA is going to be considering combinatorial
uses of the rules, so rules which look dodgy on their own might
be gems for the GA -- perhaps something with a S/O ratio of .5
actually occurs often in combination with some other rule, and
in those situations, helps to distinguish spam vs nonspam.
C
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
| scam | en |
Are you sure about Harrison's dates for attending Winter Haven High School? The one you've linked to was born in 1944 and was graduating college in 1966, long before he's shown attending high school. Is this another John Michael Harrison? If so, the link should be removed until he warrants a page. Thanks! | toxic | en |
Wait explain to me how she has been fucked over? Earns millions, doesn't worry about paying bills, has no kids, no responsibility, has young girls look up to her, and men groveling at her feet! | adult_sexism | en |
Wow, I hope it doesn't come to the firing squads and executions as a summary. You are still going to have to make on-going changes to the article to keep it relevant, especially in the Political Positions section. It seems a rather daunting task to separate the person from the role when talking about a politician. Especially one who appears to have taken position on some highly controversial issues in a country as divided as Ukraine is today. I don't know about you but I think it rather short-sighted to deny the Russian language its special role in Ukraine. Imagine the French Canadians reaction if French were to be deprived of its status. 71.39.6.142 | toxic | en |
"
Good, thank you. One more question. With or without Checkuser? 520 " | toxic | en |
I'll try to keep an eye on that article. | toxic | en |
== Semi-protected edit request on 9 September 2015 ==
On the page for Queer, it said that the word is used for anyone not both heterosexual and cisgender. As a straight (heterosexual) trans woman doing this erases my identity. Historically having grown up in the 70s, 80s, and 90s, queer was a sexuality slur. Tranny or shemale was a slur against me. I've been called queer, a fag, and a tranny many times in my life. Queer and fag were sexuality slurs.
There is a large section of straight trans men and women who distance themselves from the LGBT movement because of the queer washing of all gender minorities. It always feels like I'm outnumbered when I point these things out to queer cis and trans people because I feel like a minority as a straight trans woman, but is there a way to reflect in the article that straight, binary identified trans people are pushed away from the LGBT by using a reclaimed sexuality slur for straight gender minorities? | toxic | en |
Violent historical suppresion of the Left: | toxic | en |
RT StephenMilIer Hillary Clinton still can't figure out why she lost the election, while Trump has already figured out how to end the Korean War. [URL] | adult_sexism | en |
re : clustering for power
jaesoo ,
as we discussed last week on wednesday meeting can you , please ,
implement clustering for power curves by geographical region . this involves the following :
1 . deciding together with risk control how many geographical regions we want to use
and which enron ' s curves belong to each region .
2 . deciding together with risk control how to choose core curves for each region . this decision can
be maid based on the a ) position size ; b ) statistical analysis . there might be other considerations .
3 . doing regression analysis for each curve versus the corresponding core curve .
winston ,
can is it possible to run var for the clustering results obtained by jaesoo with clustering done by sas ?
should we wait for the stage re - fresh and what is the status on this ?
tanya . | scam | en |
"
I suggest that the person who's against this point out the important details so they can be merged and not deleted. FFF " | toxic | en |
Hi Angr,
Thanks again. Yes, of course, PORCOM need not mean porkom, since we obviously know next to nothing about Lusitanian. Furthermore, I really couldn't say what options the Iberian syllabary had to offer a Celtic or, in any case, Indo-European language of the Iberian peninsula. Thanks also for clarifying Proto-Celtic *gw. I have one more question for you. Since you explained so clearly the Insular Celtic outcomes of the PIE cluster *sp, can you tell me what the outcomes of that cluster are in Gaulish, word-initially and medially? I can't think of any examples off hand. | toxic | en |
REDIRECT User talk:Cozy McBlanket | toxic | en |
== Cinavia ==
... should be added to the DRM section. (Don't have time myself now.) | toxic | en |
"}}
Here are a few key questions:
Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
Do you understand conflict of interest?
Do you understand that to be considered for an encylopedia article, the subject must be considered to be notable?
You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above. '''''' (Talk) " | toxic | en |
I only mention it because the previous edit was also a reversion, so it might have been wiser to check the edit history first. It shows a string of reversions. I recommended the self revert because you have added back the contentious material, which is contrary to the established convention of discussion before addition that has been adopted in the Obama-related articles. | toxic | en |
I agree.
I agree with all this. I served as a member of the C6F staff from Dec. 1990 to Dec 1992, when the flagship was onboard the USS Belknap. | toxic | en |
Censorship on Islamist Terrorism
Try not being a censor monger. Properly cited information should not be deleted. | toxic | en |
Breaking redirects
Do not deliberately break redirects or you will be reported for vandalism. We had this link which you deliberately rebroke by replacing it withj this . You have now been warned, | toxic | en |
Hello
I noticed you added coordinates to Gingerman Raceway. Could you do the same thing for Grand Prix of Houston and Roebling Road Raceway? | toxic | en |
== Michael Obille ==
It's obvious this article was lacking sources, but the notability guidelines for actors, sportsmen and musicians state state that winning awards like Filipino Academy of Movie Arts and Sciences Award (especially when it's not one but 3 times) is notable. If you come across something like this again, please consider asking for sources instead of deletion. - | | toxic | en |
as soon as I get back from deez | toxic | en |
@darealwalt_jr he see the jig | toxic | en |
Salakay Saliling Mling | toxic | en |
== Omar ==
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. | toxic | en |
An editor pushed me off the article in the way it was organized. Feel free to raise the issue on the article's talk page, or just add it. | toxic | en |
d - g energy software procurement
laine ,
enclosed is a revised copy of the software licence agreement with d - g energy . the earlier version had prices and conditions of use which differed from what had been discussed over the telephone . this version brings into line the terms with what has been agreed upon , and has been given tentative approval by the president of d - g , who i met with last week .
i have highlighed the sections which have changed from the version that you sent out for signature last november .
i assume that the revised document will have to be reviewed by legal again . let me know if i can be of any assistance in this process .
regards ,
stinson gibner | scam | en |
"
== Organization needed ==
The lead section of this article does not accurately convey the current content. It implies that, at the very least, the following topics will be described and discussed:
* Anomalous localized resonance
* Diploar scattering
* Tunneling light transmittance
* Sensors and active sources
* Transformation optics
Just skimming over this article, this doesn't appear to be the case. In fact, transformation optics seems to pervade more of the article than its heading suggests, while none of the other terms are defined or even used in an easily recognized form in the remainder of the article. And, of course, there's the ever-present problem of jargon-dense information without any more readily accessible introductions to each subtopic.
It seems to me that the chief problem of this article is that it has no organization; i.e., a well-defined subject that can be broken down into subtopics and arranged in a logical flow. I only ever got as far as an physics minor in college (not optics!), and my head spins trying to assess the content as it is. But I suspect that it might be assembled into something like this:
* [Lead section] – mostly done, although (A) metamaterial is not defined (anywhere in the article, in fact; a link is not enough), and (B) the last sentence is jarringly specific and should be moved elsewhere
* Science of cloaking – what it means to ""cloak"" something, or render it invisible; why it's a challenge (it could even be called ""Quest for invisibility"" if you want to get dramatic)
* Theoretical approaches – introduce subject, with at least a few sentences on why metamaterial is part of this article's title (i.e., why they're part of these cloaking approaches), then provide sections in the order described in the lead section
** Anomalous localized resonance
** Diploar scattering
** Tunneling light transmittance
** Sensors and active sources
** Transformation optics
** Broadband ground-plane cloak (?)
* Proposed applications
* Institutional research
* See also, etc.
Assuming this is a reasonable organization of the content, all the remaining material should go under one of these headings. (Even if transformation optics winds up being a huge subsection, the other approaches should have at least summary paragraphs as placeholders. The structure will show potential editors what's needed.) If they don't fit, then my suggestion isn't adequate, but some logical order and flow needs to be imposed. Also, the current ""In the news"" section doesn't belong here at all. If there is meaningful information to contribute from these media sightings, it should be incorporated into the text of the article with appropriate citations.
I realize that this article has gone through a few major transformations, which no doubt contributed to the problems. I hope my suggestions are of some use in fixing them. ~ " | toxic | en |
Do you know where I put my brain? | toxic | en |
You think this is fine? (talk • edits) | toxic | en |
"
Yes, I noticed, the text, mostly in the section ""Lennox Crisis"" is a summary of this article, Macauley, Sarah. 'The Lennox Crisis', 1558-1563.', Northern History 41.2 (2004). I can't tell if this text a good summary of that article, or if that article is useful from this summary. " | toxic | en |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.