text stringlengths 1 299k | label stringclasses 4
values | lang stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|
"
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Dolphin, you will be blocked from editing. — (talk) " | toxic | en |
"
Wanna be Nazi meeting in 10 days for you and your family
What makes you think that editing a single web page and protecting the content will change anyones view on ""SAMOA"". How could possibly know anything about Samoa, unless you're in the community. The history is an oral history - means theres not many references other than 19th century junk written ethnographic studies [who used to compare black people with ape skulls], old religious Anthroplogy [and cowboy Archaeologists], and war propaganda [one sided versions of history, written only by english speaking nut jobs, who can't get over that Imperialism was defeated, and the there was no such thing as the British Empire..it was a trading empire at most].
I'm very sure you have no culture, and wish to impose your own views on everyone elses culture. If you were smart [had balls], you'd go find the people that wiped out your culture, and go play your little propaganda games on them." | toxic | en |
==Fanatics==
How dare you delete my post because you chose to live in La La Land! The time before common sense and science! You are not gay and have never had to suffer with it. You are a hate monger! Enjoy your fake Bible. A book written by man for man. A book that has lead to millions of deaths due to war and hatrid! A book that anyone with common sense can see is fake! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by • . | toxic | en |
Category:I have given the link for the information, its from the Milagrow Humantech offical website | toxic | en |
Perhaps someone would like to incorporate the following:
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3389481,00.html | toxic | en |
good afternoon
christie ,
i wanted to update you on my schedule for december as you are working to
arrange some time for vince and i to visit with the enron leadership group .
we had talked about the first week in december and that is good for me
through wednesday dec 6 th . i will be at a conference at harvard on the 7 th
and 8 th . however , the next couple of weeks are also possibilities if we
can squeeze in some time .
thanks
john
john d . martin
carr p . collins chair in finance
finance department
baylor university
po box 98004
waco , tx 76798
254 - 710 - 4473 ( office )
254 - 710 - 1092 ( fax )
j _ martin @ baylor . edu
web : http : / / hsb . baylor . edu / html / martinj / home . html | scam | en |
The first thing you said about her is that she's ugly. Sounds like you deserve the hate. Work on yourself. | adult_sexism | en |
"
== Martin Taylor ==
Hi, I was wondering if you had a good reason for moving Martin Taylor (goalkeeper) and Martin Taylor (defender) to disambiguate them by year of birth instead? I realise playing position isn't necessarily a sensible means of disamb'ing outfielders, but don't really see the point of changing (goalkeeper) and (defender).
However, you may have missed the bit on the Move tab that says ""Links to the old page title will not be changed; be sure to check for double redirects (using ""What links here"") after the move. You are responsible for making sure that links continue to point where they are supposed to go.""
As it stands, if you visit Martin Taylor (defender) and click on What links here, you get this list. If you click on, say, Olivier Tebily, it contains a link to Martin Taylor (defender). Click on that and instead of reaching Martin Taylor (footballer born 1979), you get to Martin Taylor (disambiguation), which is a redirect to Martin Taylor, which is a disambiguation page, and only then can you find a link to Martin Taylor the defender.
You may want to pop back and mend the multiple redirects. cheers, " | toxic | en |
"::::Now, now, that's just plain mean. Please try not to insult other editors. What if one were to say that your history is ""terrible"", as I personally believe?
" | toxic | en |
Eurovision is a high key international event? Don't think so, Lordi was barely mentioned in the news and there was the odd reference in tv shows at the time but the thing pretty much blew over by the end of that week | toxic | en |
":::You were the one stating ""…then nominate it for deletion."" Raising the topic of AfDs when discussing the appropriateness of a is either (i) a canard or (ii) a non sequitor. As the main alternative to thinking you are ""a complete moron"" is thinking that you're being dishonest (per alternative (i)), I will withhold comment. ''''(P)
" | toxic | en |
*** Hi, Ouital! Let's move the hirarchy here. When writing about ROORC it would be nice to write more about its current state, its social and phylosophical positioning etc. And, yes, you are right - there are only 2 churches of this hierarchy now. But, for example, when Orkuzhniki and Neokruzhniki separated form each other in 1860th, they both were Belokrinitsk-ian, while beeing actually different churches. So princilaplly there's enough stuff to write here that couldn't be written in the ROORC article. | toxic | en |
There are more than 150 hits for TLIP on google according to discussion. And if Bay Currents had an article mentioning the film maker. I would say it is notable. Can you please state the name of the article and date. Post it to the AFD discussion and also cite it in the TLIP article. If you don't want to, then just post it to my discussion page here and I will get the reference up on the AFD page and TLIP article and change my vote to keep. Waikiki!!! ElectricEye | toxic | en |
"Do those who want to include conspiracy evidence also believe the earth is flat?==
The editor who fears that the inclusion of facts about Oswald's claim of being made a patsy by the use of fabricated evidence and then being silenced by murder, has received support from another editor by the name of Mr. Harris. (See, above) Mr. Harris argues the beliefs there was a plot to kill the president, and that Oswald was set up, is similar to believing the earth is flat.
No Mr. Harris, you are out of step with the modern world. In 1979, a Congressional Committee engaged in a three year study and determined that Kennedy was probably murdered as a result of a conspiracy, and in 2003 only 22% of Americans agree with you. Mr. Harris, you are clinging to the past in the face of overwhelming information to the contrary that is slowly being made public as more and more documents are declassified. Sometimes one has to question old beliefsnot try to delete facts from books that disprove ones old beliefs.
Congress enacted federal legislation in 1992 to open up the mass of secret government records about the assassination. The Assassination Records Review Board points out that not many people agree with Mr. Harris:
""The American public has expressed its dissatisfaction with both the work and the conclusions of the official investigations of the assassination and it was this dissatisfaction that was primarily responsible for Congress' initiative to establish the Assassination Records Review Board (Review Board). Section 3(2) of the JFK Act defines the records of each of these official investigative entities as assassination records. As such, the Review Board worked to review and release all records that these investigative entities used in reaching their conclusions about the assassination.""
Mr. Harris it won't help you cause to argue that everyone but you is dumb, a ""flat-earth believer"", or must be sheltered from the facts. Please, just stop deleting facts from the articles. The old viewpoint that you want to believe is in the article. But, you’re not
satisfied. You want to keep out the evidence that makes your position to look improbable, but the web site rules forbid you deleting such information.
==" | toxic | en |
"
This is hardly a ""biographical article""
All material in this article is taken from subject's own promotional materials or her own writing. It is more of a CV than a biography. No date of birth or other bio-appropriate info is supplied. If subject is worthy of an article, where are the citations? " | toxic | en |
[USER] I am concerned that if there are any other events with this Muslim teen, she may become victim to an honor killing. | adult_sexism | en |
"
::Oh God yes please! Its like when Deanna Troi had Will Riker shave his in one of the movies (cant remember which one.... hey Im not THAT MUCH of a nerd!). I audibly screamed ""NO!"" and sulked through the rest of the picture. You are far more sexy with da beard. " | toxic | en |
I wonder if she and Hussein shared prayer mats in the Oval office? | adult_sexism | en |
"
==Kilogram and Gene (*sigh*)==
I got your message on my talk page. I was baffled as to why got blocked for a week because I couldn’t immediately find any disruptive behavior after I started looking at his contributions history. Finally, I realized that this choice rant/objection on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents really snowballed on him—and entirely on autopilot too; he didn’t chime in once after it started snowballing. I didn’t know all that was going on. The Eddie Haskell in me finds some measure of satisfaction in this but the Ward Cleaver in me is really disappointed that the block was due to “lipping off” to administrators that was interpreted as a lack of contrition. Instead, it should have been over the “real” issue: how G*d d*amned disruptive he’s been lately. I remember when I was first working on Thermodynamic temperature and he corrected me numerous times. I remembered him as 1) being intolerant, and 2) always correct. I always figured him as the prototypical sort that is often described as “not suffering fools easily” and tried not to be a fool when he was lurking about. I can see from his block log that most of his offensive behavior has been a rather recent phenomenon. He seems to have changed and that’s too bad. I was truly rather disappointed in him because his way-off-base battle over “weight” didn’t match the Gene I remembered.
As for your advise that I should wait “for him to return before going anywhere substantial with the article”, I understand your point and why you felt the need to pass along the caution. I can assure you that I have zero intention to try to take advantage of the situation. I noticed this allegation by an administrator on “The Gene topic” on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard that I “baited Gene.” I was tempted to object to that in an open forum and then thought the better of it given what happened to Gene. But that administrator’s allegation is 100%, industrial-strength “El toro poo poo” (Bol mierda). The only edits I make are good-faith ones. Period. I did note that after I made an edit, Gene reverted it here along with the threat that “…if Greg L insists on changing this, ""dubious"" tag goes back on.” Of course, I waited until Gene was no longer blocked before making any changes and was frankly surprised that Gene would have objected to that particular one because the difference was over a subtlety and was factually unassailable. But after he objected to it—and even after he threatened to again slap the article with {{disputed}} tags, one can’t cave in the face of “Wiki-terrorism” threats; he really went overboard with that comment so I simply ignored it. Gene obviously had sufficient judgment to not carry through with the threat. Those three edits are what I think the administrator may have tarred and feathered with his “bait” allegation. I understand it would be highly inappropriate to purposely exploit the current situation (Gene being blocked for a week). I also know that at some point, I have to treat the whole “Gene thing” as just another bug splat on my windshield of life and get on with doing the right thing: making good-faith edits and having fun as a volunteer on a collaborative writing phenomenon. But I’ll also be careful to not do any edits that might be interpreted as intentionally provocative.
Again, thanks for your time and attention on this matter. ('''' " | toxic | en |
REDIRECT Talk:Diego del Alcázar, 10th Marquis of La Romana | toxic | en |
"
Condition of room when found
Resolved.
It has been retracted in several newpapers and magazines that there were not pills ""strewn about the room"" in which he was found. The police report itself states that there were several pill bottles on the nightstand. Please correct this as it really makes it look worse than it is and it is irresposible to repeat something that was in in the tabloids. While I understand that Wiki can be inaccurate, this statement is just wrong. I can't give you the names of the correct reporting services unfortunately, but I believe The New York Times corrected their statement about the condiftion of the room and several others as well. Thx so much for this page by the way. Good job! Barb 3-15-2008
Opps, did I miss something? when I went back to the page, the text above was gone. Maybe I was looking at a chached page? Sorry..Barb
Reading the sources given throughout this entire article makes clear what the more current official NYC and NY State offices determined. There has been repeated acts of vandalism and frequent deletion of reliable third-party published sources from this article. (It is currently still semi-protected from anonymous IP users for that reasonscroll up and see archive and talk page history.)
As editors, people need to take some time and examine the editing history to find precisely what they are referring to, and to provide links to editing differences (""diffs."") to document what they are referring to. (Please add an exact link or quotation.) Please provide the editing history links and look at the archived talk page history of this article where I recall discussion of this matter already being made. This comment does seem familiar. If you or someone else made it before, please provide a link to the archived talk page section where it's discussed already. In Wikipedia one does need to give ""the names of the correct reporting services"" and provide precise citations (author, title, url and/or name of work published, dates, accessdates) as per the current citation template format used in this article. Thanks.
This comparison to the ""diffs."" shows that a later editor has corrected the problem frequently introduced throughout the history of the editing of this article (scroll through ""newer edit"" consecutively): (Diffs.) and (Diffs.). As requested above in this sec. of comments: Please do not introduce obsolete rumors into this article. Please review the archive of talk page discussions and the editing history. Thanks. [added another link to corr. of misinformation added by earlier edits. ]
[Please sign comments using four tildes: scroll up to top of page for guidelines. Thanks. ]
[I've added the templates & reconstructed info. from editing hist. ]
Current state of this article
This article still needs more work in my view; it is still too dependent on rumors and tabloid journalism sources. Its sources are in many cases tabloid newspapers that rely on anonymous sources in their reporting and that convey unsupported rumors.
Frequently, when one tries to update this article with reliable third-party published sources, the updated information is being deleted with what appear to me to be explanations that are not supported by Wikipedia's own policies and guidelines for editing. The current infobox template is an example; one cannot just make up one's own rules and regulations; the descriptions in the template box for the parameters are explicit. There is no requirement for ""legal"" meaning of ""Domestic partnership"" (""domestic partner(s)"") in the parameter of that infobox: Template:Infobox actor; it makes clear that the parameter refers to ""romantic relationships"" in a more general sense. The same editor keeps removing the information about Michelle Williams and Heath Ledger being ""domestic partners"" (in the meaning def | toxic | en |
Thanks. Definitely I will file a report. I already have few proofs. Once I file completely, I will be announcing that in my blog. Thanks for understanding again. | toxic | en |
That's y i said it's bad dat all e gals know u... Wat u doing now? | scam | en |
sally beck ' s group data room index
please see attached .
note to steve : there are 5 duplicate binders on my office floor of this material ( copying already done ) . however , there is some counterparty specific information in certain reports , primarily by way of example . we may want to redact , please check this .
cordially ,
mary cook
enron north america corp .
1400 smith , 38 th floor , legal
houston , texas 77002 - 7361
( 713 ) 345 - 7732
( 713 ) 646 - 3393 ( fax )
mary . cook @ enron . com | scam | en |
edit Woops I was wrong, this is raw data. Full of artifacts and stuff, the hi-res images will be released during the following weeks if I am not mistaken. Huygens took aprox. 350 images, that a whole lot 'o images. | toxic | en |
"
::::::Yes, of course.- " | toxic | en |
Proposal on Lists of Notable Drew University People
A proposal has been initiated on the Drew University talk page regarding how notable alumni, faculty, and presidents should be listed. Feel free to join the discussion. | toxic | en |
By the way you were called a facist up there, is that silent consent? 24.77.204.120 | toxic | en |
"
The sections that you added were copied verbatim from http://www.dawn.com/2003/09/21/fea.htm . That's a copyright violation (in addition to being simple plagiarism). I don't know what you mean about ""the relevance of it with the link you posted"". Are you referring to the link to WP:copyvio? " | toxic | en |
ppa auction
the government of alberta power purchase arrangement auction of the regulated
generation plants and units commenced wednesday , august 2 nd , and will
continue through a number of rounds over a number of days and possibly
weeks . enron canada power corp . ( ecpc ) , a wholly - owned subsidiary of enron
canada corp . , is an invited bidder participating in the auction . for
strategic corporate purposes and as a result of restrictions imposed under
the auction participation agreement and the auction rules ( compliance with
which is secured by a us $ 27 mm bid deposit ) , any information , details or
speculation regarding ecpc ' s involvement in the auction , including whether
ecpc is participating or continuing to participate in the auction or has
withdrawn from the auction at any time , the plants or units ecpc is or is not
bidding on , the amounts ecpc is bidding or is approved for bidding , and any
other information whatsoever about the auction process is to be kept strictly
confidential . in particular , the auction has been followed closely by the
media and may be of interest to shareholders , investors and other
constituents , and such communications are prohibited until after the auction
has been completed and the winning bidders have been announced by the
government of alberta .
if you have any questions or concerns , please contact peter keohane , enron
canada corp . , at 403 - 974 - 6923 or peter . keohane @ enron . com . | scam | en |
Dogs?
Maybe I'm missing something, but wouldn't this fall under the scope of Wikiproject Primates, rather than dogs? | toxic | en |
"
Alex Jones occasionally misspeaks, as do many public speakers, so for you to nitpick on his Tel Aviv comment is merely irrational opportunism on your part. If you disagree with what he says, and want to see him silenced by accusing him of being ""fringe"", this only shows your lack of courage in learning the truth. I understand there were people who once called Galileo fringe and wanted him silenced... people like you. " | toxic | en |
High School
Did you know that Salisbury couldn't read in high school? I am friends with Kevin Brown, one of Sean's teachers at Orange Glen when he was a student there, and he said that Sean needed special tutors because he couldn't even read!! Seems funny that nobody ever talks about thatit's really an amazing story!! | toxic | en |
"
Incorrect Images
In the image box, there is a NTSC USA SNES and a NTSC-J Japanese Super Famicom, if you hover over the Famicom image it says ""The PAL version of SNES"" when it isn't a SNES and it isn't PAL it's an NTSC-J Super Famicom, can someone fix this.94.172.127.37 " | toxic | en |
The Needle and the damage done
>>From the Hoax or Hack Dept:
Digital Needle - A Virtual Gramophone , a reported method to scan yourr
old LPs on a flat bed scanner and then use the resulting images to make
MP3's of the fine playing conatined therein. Its all still sketchy to the
point of possible hoaxdom, but the idea is dang interesting.
http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/~springer/
| scam | en |
"
:::Indeed: there's absolutely no mention of no. 10000 or the W1 class in the story concerned. But it's not me that needs convincing - it's . " | toxic | en |
Improving this Article
It is difficult to improve on such a knowledgeable and well-written article. In the interests of journalistic fairness and balance, I only add a section on Criticisms of Special Relativity by qualified scientists. I hope other editors will respect my viewpoint as I respect yours. | toxic | en |
"
It continues to be shown here, PL and Jim62sch - that both of you are not interested in the slightest in a balanced Nostradamus subject. You continual banter serves only to reinforce both of your ability to have anything relating to Nostradamus and true history. You bring shame to yourselves alone with your false claims, and ""attempts"" to rewrite history on Wikipedia. To the ridiculous claim that Nostradamus was NOT an Astrologer (PL & Jim) to PL's continued slighting and censoring of the author - Nostradamus himself. You statements, and comments are archived, and on the Talk Page for all to see, and it is no wonder why you ridcule myself, and Giancarlo Rossi - both Nostradamus scholars as well. I suggest that PL, and Jim actually learn more about astrology than to cover up their clear ignorance of the science and art of astrology; especially when it comes to Michel Nostradamus. The cynical, rude comments just flow from both of you, PL, and Jim, like some sad tag team. Obviously, your lack of astrological knowledge disqualifies you from even approaching this subject - and this too is clear from your comments, which has little understanding of astrology in general, and the practice of it in Renaissance Europe in particular. But, rather than being honest about it - you smirk, and are rude to others who show they are knowledgable. This proves your negative point-of-view PL, and Jim, and clearly demonstrates your inability to be taken seriously as you pick, and whine constantly like spoiled children. You accomplish nothing, and your ""edits"" on this subject is proof of that. " | toxic | en |
::For earth - have a look at the lyrics and what they link to. cheers, · | toxic | en |
Tom Hoobler
I'll take your word for it that you are the contestant mentioned here, but you're editing from an AOL IP address, used by countless other people, many vandals. If you want to continue to contribute to Wikipedia, I'd suggest signing up for an account. It can actually be more anonymous than an IP address (I know, after all, that your ISP is AOL), and other editors will take you more seriously. | toxic | en |
===Skylanders 4 identity revealed===
Thanks to this video I've recently watched, I've figured out what the 4th Skylanders game is going to be called. Skylanders: Trap Team. It will be released for the Wii, WiiU, PS3, PS4, Xbox 360, and Xbox One, and it will be released on October 5, 2014. | toxic | en |
"
==1% (South Park)==
Hi. Regarding your edits to 1% (South Park), please do not rearrange the plot summary, as there is no reason for A-plot and B-plot to be summarized separately. Care should be taken to provide them in a way that mirrors how they occurred concurrently as much as possible. Also
*""Fifth Graders"" is not a proper noun.
*""This incites Butters and Jimmy, and an angry group of Fifth Graders with an idea"" is wrong. Butters and Jimmy came up with one idea, and the fifth graders came up with a different one.
*Regarding the passage ""Despite being at Token's house, mistaking a concerned Stan, Kyle, and Kenny as the killers, the real killer manages to get inside and proceeds to put Muscle Man Marc in boiling water. Finding Rumper Tumpskin, Cartman is forced to watch his toy's head blown off by the culprit, Cartman's doll Polly Prissypants. "" two points: First, it is only necessary to summarize the plot. All we need to inform the reader is that more of Cartman's toys are being destroyed. We do not need to emphasize specific details about the mutilations. This is why the previous summary is more streamlined. Second, you mention Rumper Tumpskin and Muscle Man Marc, without explain who or what they are. Given the number of varied non-human and fantasy characters that appear in the series, you can't assume that readers know who these people are. This is another reason why just saying, ""Despite being at Token's house, Cartman discovers Muscle Man Marc and Rumper Tumpskin, two more of his toys, destroyed, with the remaining one, a doll named Polly Prissypants, sitting in an armchair with a revolver, claiming responsibility for all the toy 'murders'."" is simpler and better. It explains to the reader what is happening in a direct, and to-the-point manner.
Thanks. " | toxic | en |
InShanee
If you'll recall, you banned me from posting on AN/I, after i posted a complaint documenting being harassed by Admin | toxic | en |
"
Hoping you will learn humility at your own pace
Re:"". . .you are free and very much encouraged to participate on Wikipedia. However, please do so using the article's talk page first. Repeatedly enforcing an edit, and undoing the work of others will get you blocked - that is the blanket policy, and with the exceptions of vandalism, will happen regardless of the merits of the edits themselves.""
Sadly, you are overstepping your bounds as administrator. A sub-heading does not amount to ""the work of others"". It is a classification an needs to change as the content it classifies changes.
Regarding the issue of nouns like ""state"", ""country"", and ""nation"": I recognize that there may be a consensus in terms of style. However, the very article in question specifies how ""country"" in partcular is used with respect to the subdivisions of the United Kingdom. Certainly, you can't hold the entire population of another state in violation of Wikipedia consensus? Clearly, there is a question of internal consistency for this page. If the larger goal of Wikipedia has to do with conveying reasonably presented knowledge, it will not do to cling to a consensus that conflicts with the knowledge being presented. You might be assisted by communicating with some ""experts"" on the subject, whether these be geographers, sociologists, anthropologists, or political scientists. Hiding behind Wikipedia policy in the face of inconsistently presented facts is not going to help the Wiki community." | toxic | en |
"
==al-Sahifa al-Sajjadiyya==
I have been reading your article which I have been asked to copy-edit, but I am afraid I cannot understand quite a lot of it. If I list the sentences, could you either rewrite them here or explain what you mean, please? Then I will be able to do some copy-editing!
#""This book ... shows the relationship between man and God with the universal language."" What does ""with the universal language"" mean?
#""Although it is a collection of Islamic knowledge and thought in supplication form."" On its own, this isn't a sentence. Where is the rest of the sentence?
#""It is said that the book was an uprising against the Umayyads."" What does this mean?
#""Also there are many descriptions about it."" Does this mean descriptions 'of' it? On its own the sentence means little. Can you say where the descriptions have appeared, for example?
#""The title of al-Sahifa al-Sajjadiyya means the book of Sajjad, which is the epithet of Ali ibn Husayn who is the fourth Shia Imam."" What do you mean by ""epithet""? This word usually means a name that is 'descriptive' of a person.
#""Al-Sahifa al-Sajjadiyya is intituled several titles such as “sister of Quran”, “Gospel of Holy Household” and “Psalms of Muhammad dynasty”; which indicate its glorification."" What is ""its"" and what does ""indicate its glorification"" mean?
#""... but also the public was unwilling"". What does this mean? Unwilling to do what?
#What is a ""sectarian and organizational booklet""? Perhaps you could either rewrite that in different words or explain what it is.
""...which the access of the government agents to make it ineffective all Imam Sajjad's efforts."" What does this mean? Can you write it in different words?" | toxic | en |
Fucking creeps | adult_sexism | en |
"
== Dance Performances ==
Why do ""The Power"", ""California Gurls"", ""Bubble Toes"", and ""Barbra Streisand"" say TBA under what album they'll be released on? If they're dance performances to the ORIGINAL songs, I don't see how this is possible. Why would they put an original version of a song on a GLEE album? Thanks for clearing this up! ) " | toxic | en |
No problem! After all, I don't want to bite the newcomers! (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) | toxic | en |
"
A lot of Turkish University Students claimed that the most of autobiographical statements of Oktay Sinanoglu are lie.
Please look this site (about Oktay Sinanoglu)
The long name of this site is: ""The Dictionary of the Technical University of Istanbul""
The subject of linked above pages: Debating on Oktay Sinanoglu.
There are 8 pages about Sinanoglu (since 2006 until today).
The most of students says about him: ""He is too liar"" and ""The most titles of Sinanoglu are false, not true.""
For your information.
Yours Sincerely.
" | toxic | en |
"
(1)I don't need to address that, as Weaver doesn't either, precisely because what works on the medium scale with say explosive device of medium size, will work on the large scale with a similarly upscaled/tailored explosive being delivered.
(2)While the article is about asteroid avoidance this sub-section is about putting nuclear explosive devices in space, therefore as I've already explained to you. It meets the requirments to be within a see also list.
(3)I'm glad you've ceased making false claims about that source and injecting the ""could""s everywhere.
" | toxic | en |
"
WP:AGF only goes so far, especially when there is the appearance of an agenda (supporting one's opinion is one thing; mentioning the victim most every time is another). As to the content of the SeaWorld article itself, it needs work ... no question. Clean out the marketing spin and focus on SeaWorld's history prior to its acquisition by Anheuser-Busch (at which point it became part of Busch Entertainment Corporation, which is now SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment). As to ""favorable vs. unfavorable,"" if that's truly how I felt, such incidents articles wouldn't exist. I've gone through with SpikeJones and other editors to keep everything consistent, first getting involved with them after the monorail accident in July 2009, when this exact same issue came up, and again consensus was that leaving out the victim's name didn't damage the article, nor did it add any significant value to it (at which point, tie goes to ""leave it out""). After that, it was the rash of lewd-behavior incidents at Central Florida water parks ... again, if I was trying to protect the parks, I wouldn't have allowed the information in, as if it were completely up to me, anyway. Heck, I added a number of them into their respective articles, and I fleshed out others with more details and more source information to back it all up! (In the interest of full disclosure, the victims in those incidents were generally minors, which (a) wouldn't have been named by the news and (b) if some unscrupulous person had gotten a hold of the names, I have no doubt the names would be expunged immediately and nobody who really had the project's best interests at heart would put up a fight. In not so many words, while also incidents, they did have special conditions that don't make them good examples in this dispute.)
These incidents articles are based purely on what's in the local newspapers, with no candy-coating, no PR spin ... save one thing, which has been followed with almost all the incident/accident articles I've reviewed, both theme-park and non-theme-park. Unless they were already notable, victims' names aren't included, because they aren't necessary to, as you put it, tell the story. There are, of course, exceptions (such as the victims of the Titanic), but the theme park incident articles are consistent.
Lastly, as to your assertion of WP:COI, I'd welcome any proof you'd care to provide in regards to edits being made currently. Previous COI edits, such as those that inspired the newspaper article you cited, should indeed be expunged and replaced by neutral point of view information. But that's an issue for another day. " | toxic | en |
great ==
You are so great. | toxic | en |
Please try to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia instead of vandalizing pages like Toaster. | toxic | en |
Hoax Section
Why did the hoax section dissapear? | toxic | en |
Deletion of a sub-article
, spun out of this article in February of this year, is now listed at Articles for deletion. | toxic | en |
have
with them. | toxic | en |
Do you like to wear adult diapers for fun? I do. | toxic | en |
Chains Remix Jealous Remix
user tomica keeps removing the sections on those nick jonas pages. while according to wiki page promo single says that a remix cant be a promo single. the remix was used to promote the song further. cant you report her or somthing for those removals | toxic | en |
[USER] Will she be a lesbian too? | adult_sexism | en |
Oh. Anthony, it seems that two out of the three administrators that you appointed to close the discussion are inactive. HJ Mitchell and EyeSerene are not editing as frequently, and will probably not be able to close the discussion. That leaves BlackKite only. I can assist in finding other administrators who can close the discussion with BlackKite. Please let me know. Regards, talk (contribs) DR goes to Wikimania! | toxic | en |
"
== Semi-protected edit request on 19 November 2014 ==
Check for ""New Yor"" " | toxic | en |
"
Um, and that helps wikipedia, how?? How is it alright for an editor to stlak my edits and threaten with speedy deletions but I am not free to remove their posts? Isn't it my talk page? Blofeld - " | toxic | en |
:If that's the way you feel about it - I have given you advice; you just don't seem to want to accept that you may be in the wrong on this. Dyxlesic agnostic has offended too, but your behaviour is worse than his has been. Go find another administrator, by all means. But my warning still stands. • | toxic | en |
Whilst agreeing with your concerns about the easiness of tool-clicking making it a literally mindless task, I see the CSD cleanup aspect as being even more damaging than the bill-sticking. We have a regular situation where a NFC (or simply WP-hosted) image is removed from an article, GF or vandalism, and within moments it's then tagged for CSD as unused. There is no attempt to manually check if it ought to be used, or even if there's still a FUR in place pointing to an article from which it has just been vandalised. There is a lot of this (and mostly from the same handful of editors). It's a serious problem where bureaucracy and the opportunity to do more serious admin bizniz has taken over completely from the direction of improving the encyclopedia. | toxic | en |
Mr.E Edits -- New Edit If Putin doesn't step out of the way America has to step in and kill that murdering mother fucker Assad. That fucker needs to die. | adult_sexism | en |
"
== Vandalism reversion on Vince McMahon ==
Thanks for catching that. I looked at the difference for all 3 edits, but my eyes didn't catch that they were different IPs.
:No problem. Looks like someone is taking advantage of a very dynamic IP.
== Anton, you might want to reconsider your edits to Haydar ==
A disambiguation page for names is perfectly normal. Look, for instance, at Rani. The problem with the Haydar page is that Shi'a Muslims wish to annex it for Ali ibn Abi Talib, for whom there is already a long article. Nobody in Wikipedia gets two articles. However, there are a number of Haydars or Haiders with articles, and any reader who wants to find the right one can use the disambiguation page to get there.
You stepped into an edit war and I do think you picked the wrong side. Please look at little harder at the talk page before you decide who's right or wrong.
Also, you seem to have deleted a chunk of the talk page.
==17th infantry==
you might want to look at the talk page before accusing me of not discussin the matter and starting an edit war. I have repeatedly stated the reason on the talk page, now if your going to start pretending to be superior and judge everyone else's edits, I suggest you yourself look at the discussion on the talk pages, and take a NPOV stance.
:Jadger, after looking at it in more detail it does look like this issue would have been better settled by the people who know the issues in detail. The particular reasons I interpreted this as vandalism were: 1) there was an active debate around the issue on the discussion page and at the same time (which on a second reading I recognize is more of a consensus toward removing the quote) 2) the deletion of what seemed to be valid and relevant content still under discussion without a 'see talk' notice in the summary 3) a warning on your talk page for deleting comments from the same page which made it sound like a revert war and 4) I've seen a rash of POV deletions that minimize or ignore killings of ethnic minorities.
== Reed College page ==
I do not understand why you reverted teh Reed Talk page and put a ""blank"" notice on my Talk page. If you had taken two seconds, you would have seen that: 1) All the comments are already in the archive; and 2) The ArbCom dispute concerning them is all but complete, and the refactoring has not been found to be a problem. So unless you explain, I will go ahead and archive the redundant comments.
:Gnetwerker, the issue on the talk page seems to be an open discussion between you and IronDuke. The refactoring process you are using doesn't seem to agree with this policy: Wikipedia:How_to_archive_a_talk_page. At least, I would suggest a link to the archives at the top of the page, and erring on the side of not removing discussions from an article talk page, especially if the issue is still being discussed.
Again, if you had taken the time to research the issue you would have discovered that: 1) There is a link to the archived page at the top of the Talk page; and 2) the dispute has been resolved by ArbCom with no finding that the refactoring was inappropriate. Finally, IronDuke has gone away. I would thank you to take the time to educate yourself on the issue if you choose to intervene further.
:I see that this has been resolved by AbsCom. For reference here's the link . You might consider archiving sections 5 and 8 of the talk page also since they seem to be a closed issue.
::That is exactly what I was doing when you reverted. " | toxic | en |
Are you saying I shouldn't revert the svg to a more fitting one, but it's okay to delete it completely? | toxic | en |
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you. | toxic | en |
"
can you point me anywhere I'm advocating that the source and its claimed sales are from IFPI? I'm not. I'm using that source based on the reliable number they posted. You do not see me posting any random source asking for a 3 million sales even if it was from the New York Times. Because that would just not be true for a moderate album like Artpop. However, a 200K increase is within the territory and that's what was being added. The documentation does not say anywhere that only IFPI can be used to source worldwide sales, that is just for the Europe Platinum awards. And can you explain how is it misleading? — · [ ChitChat ] " | toxic | en |
I have provided you by some new info regarding falsetto which wankers like 4meter4 cannot acceept simply because they think they know everything. I do not get shit about wikipedia any more because you are unable to avoid wankers like 4meter4. Feel free to mention the shit around the world. Feel free to block me for ever! | toxic | en |
Seperation into articles
Well, since accordions have serveral small pages for their types, I proposed we also seperate them.
Here's my divisions planned:
Harmonica (this page)
Construction
History
related instruments
Diatonic Harmonica (mereg with blues harps)
Chromatic Harmonica (include orchestral harmonica)
Tremelo harmonica
Won't include techniques, as there exist harmonica books already.
I plan to do this starting thursday. RSVP. | toxic | en |
Blocking Wiki Stalkers?
Is there a way to block wiki stalkers?
Goldberg is funny, because she has no eyebrows. How often do you use wikipedia? Seriously, that post was more intelligent than 90% of the things posted here, and you do nothing about those.
Posting bullying comments on my page and deleting content I posted can be construed as vandalism and stalking. Wiki moderators can block people who do that. Cheers. | toxic | en |
"""I understand the points you are making and I encourage you to continue to raise them in talk when you are next able to do so""
I am able to do so. However, the page is locked. Therefore the points remain silenced. We can continue chatting about procedural matters until you get your important points through my thick skull. Or you are free to unlock the content & perhaps risk massive vandalism & unthinkable horrible things. Your call chief.
" | toxic | en |
Beware websites that HAVE NO AUTHOR NAME. Whereas I advocate using some websites, I do not
endorse using ALL websites. 99% of all Bigfoot websites are garbage. 97% have no author name, and no contact info. Good ones are htpp://www.bigfootresearch.com and http://www.bigfoot.org most photos and PhDs. Another one is http://www.bigfootencounters.com Bobby Short. If any of these are wrong addresses, try putting net or org in place of com. Martial Law is overly impressed by
fancy graphics and expensive style. No name, no game.
jeff | toxic | en |
Further, my first behavior block was 2 weeks, so to go from 2 weeks to 6 months for my second behavior block is utterly absurd and spectacularly unfair given what others routinely get away with. | toxic | en |
And https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Scenic shows the album sucking up dozens of mislinks from subjects related to scenery... | toxic | en |
Featured Pictures Candidates
My apologies – I moved three featured pictures from Featured Pictures Candidates straight to Featured Pictures and didn't add the nominations to the archive. I didn't actually know there was an archive page, because I didn’t notice the link on the candidate page. Sorry 'bout that. Won't happen again. ]] 15:41, Sep 20, 2004 (UTC) | toxic | en |
"
Yes, Boon is a joke. So is M Hughes Ranted '''' (cricket calendar poll!'') " | toxic | en |
I have done some reverting, and I hope that the content of the page can be checked. | toxic | en |
":Good day, I just got your note. With respect, I think you should read up a bit more on the subject. The ""single bullet"" most certainly was not found in ""mint"" condition, it was deformed and flattened. And the bullet fragments found in Connally and JFK added to the weight of the bullet in question did not exceed the weight of a pristine bullet from the lot in question. As for all the amateurs who proclaim it should have been far more beat up, experts consistently testified that relatively undamaged bullets causing so much damage are not unusual at all. And in case that was not believed, tests on cadavers recreating the wounds in question produced bullets which were similarly undamaged. IOW, this objection has been raised, and shot down.
" | toxic | en |
::: And it's 2013 and I'll probably give this page a few edits. | toxic | en |
"
Avi's claim of ""POV bias""
" | toxic | en |
CG Wiki
I've started up a CG Wiki at cgwiki.elwiki.com (it'll become a seperate website once it gets 10 articles, and it's for free). If you would like, you can join it (you can become a bureaucrat and a SysOp), though I will need extreeeeeeme heeeeeeeeelp!!!!!!!. And, it's written in the Montenegrin language as intended. Think about it and if yes, come join and help out. Please, just do follow the rules of the Montenegrin language on the wiki when contributing. Bye. | toxic | en |
they get so defensive about it too jfl if it wasnât chad theyâd start insulting your appearance | adult_sexism | en |
Not until that comes from a reputable news source should that be considered official. | toxic | en |
Yes, what about Cairo? It should be ranked in the Top 15 or even Top 10 list. | toxic | en |
"
I don't see why this is a problem. TheSlashdot has an ""Article Section"" Section on the page, and it lists every one of the sections. 4chan and slashdot are just about equally established and popular amongst Internet users, (Alexa traffic rankings rank 4chan at 753 and slashdot at 573), so I don't see why 4chan doesn't deserve a section on its boards. " | toxic | en |
"
::Panonian: I am now officially angry at you. Also at everyone else who treated Koppany so badly because they all assumed bad faith. Look, I know VinceB when I see him, and Koppany wasn't him. (""Pannonia"", on the other hand, probably is.) Koppany has been registered for almost 2 years, I just hadn't met him before which is why I mistakenly assumed he was a newbie. He doesn't write like Vince, he doesn't misuse English like Vince, he doesn't act like Vince. He wasn't Vince, he was Koppany, and thanks to the prejudice and cruelty of certain users, Wikipedia has now lost a potentially valuable contributor. I'm sorry I ever got involved in this dispute. Koppany, if you're reading this, I'm really sorry that you had to run into it too. I did what I could to help, but it wasn't enough, I'm sorry. I am leaving Wikipedia now, I will be gone for at least two weeks and every day of my absence will be in protest of the cruel and trollish behavior that goes on here far too often. " | toxic | en |
I'm watching the show right now on the Sci-Fi channel | toxic | en |
HEY C, I AGREE AND THINK THE PERSON WHO STARTED THIS SECTION IS A LIAR TOO, AND I TOLD YA THESE PEOPLE ARE CRAZY!!!!! lol ANYWAY I SEE THAT YOU'RE FROM Atlanta kudos (VERY BEAUTIFUL AND WARM NICE PEOPLE), I READ IN Hip Hop Weekly and heard Wendy Williams SAY THAT THE WORD ON THE STREET OUT THERE IN THE ATL IS THAT Ciara SLEPT WITH Young Jeezy TO FINISH UP NEGOTIATIONS FOR HER CURRENT SINGLE AND VIDEO........ OOOOH ITS A SHAME AND I PERSONALLY THINK SHE DEALT WITH 50 Cent IN 2007 AS WELL lol, IS THE Chris Brown ARTICLE UPDATED YET????? I'M VERY DISAPPOINTED IN HIM ESPECIALLY AFTER I WATCHED Inside Edition WHEN THE BEAUTIFUL HOST REPORTED THAT BOTH OF THEIR TEAMS (MANAGERS, PUBLICISTS ETC.) TRIED TO COVER UP ALL TRUE ALLEGATIONS AND STORIES. IT WAS NICE CHATTING WITH YA FOR A GOOD UNNOTICEABLE HALF HOUR, I'LL KEEP IN MIND AND CONTINUE TO ADD REFERENCES, THANK YA!!!!!!!! | toxic | en |
==Request to lift topic ban of user:Ed Poor on Unification church talk pages==
You may be intersted in this. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment#Request_to_amend_prior_case:_Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration.2FEd_Poor_2 | toxic | en |
“@PubesOnFleeK: My tweets trash” | toxic | en |
"
:Have you changed your name? I didn't know who the hell you were. Geez... Don't you sleep? What time is it over there... Of course I know the rules, but I've spent too much time on this sodding computer and can't think clearly. Look for a new image for Loughrea crest soon... " | toxic | en |
the format that said is the format that all have discographies. | toxic | en |
Heh, it don't matta! On another note: Take a look here if you get a chance. TALK | toxic | en |
Antaeus Feldspar reverts
Please explain why are you deleting factual information. 23:33, May 21, 2005 (UTC) | toxic | en |
Extra edit buttons on Simple?
Hi, would you have time to help with a problem? I'm feeling my way around trying to understand how to set up scripts, with which you are clearly an expert. Another editor in the Simple English wikipedia has a Scandinavian keyboard that lacks [] and {} characters. I set up a very crude script here, which is usable for someone with a strong sense of humour, but your is clearly much nicer. Would you be able to help bring that functionality over to Simple? | toxic | en |
You left out the anti-Oxfordian book Nina (or was it Zweigenbaum? No matter.) brought up a while back, Spearing the Wild Blue Boar (2009), by Frederick A. Keller, who cites the very same Wadsworth quote as we do in the lede (258-9). | toxic | en |
"
Ultimatum - noun, a final demand or statement of terms, the rejection of which will result in retaliation or a breakdown in relations. So you want some specific person to put their foot down, and demand something of you, otherwise they'll throw a hissy-fit? Weird. Who is this person you're referring to? By the way, if you read the previous sections instead of just starting new ones every few hours you'll see that this question has come up before several times... just to be ignored by you. Propose this section be removed per wp:TALK (""Deleting material not relevant to improving the article (per the above subsection #How to use article talk pages)"" is permitted). Stop creating new discussion sections with new topics as soon as someone replies to you. " | toxic | en |
but maybe they were just being nice. Hmm, inconclusive. Attractive girls don't usually do that in my experience. ¯\\\_(ã?_/¯ | adult_sexism | en |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.