text stringlengths 1 299k | label stringclasses 4
values | lang stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|
== Nipple Cripple ==
24.215.89.228's edit about nipple twisting as an school yard torture is interesting, but does not seem to fit in with the formal tone of this article. I am moving it to List of school pranks where there is a section on nipple cripple/purple nurple, and add a link to there from here. | toxic | en |
Done. Perhaps a list to include items (Talon Mercs / 10mm sub) is usefull? | toxic | en |
Fine. But which ancient or medieval bridge had a span of more than 57 meters? | toxic | en |
No. Thank you. You've been wonderful | scam | en |
Er... what's this article all about?? IMHO it could do with an introductory paragraph for the general reader. | toxic | en |
fw : press release
eric ,
i did not send to corp . i assume you will to the extent required .
you can reach letty at 713 - 552 - 2227 . let me know how i can help .
thanks
don
- - - - - original message - - - - -
from : serna , leticia [ mailto : lserna @ tractebelusa . com ]
sent : thursday , october 18 , 2001 4 : 19 pm
to : miller , don ( asset mktg )
cc : restrepo , juan
subject : press release
per juan restrepo ' s request :
attached is the monterrey press release for your comments .
since juan will be out of the office tomorrow , can you provide any comments
to me by tomorrow afternoon ?
thank you ,
letty
> | scam | en |
"
In what way? There are hundreds of cities known to predate Jerusalem. They just do not exist anymore. Calling it ""one of the oldest still existing cities in the world."" would be more accurate. " | toxic | en |
HOA HẬU THẾ GIỚI | toxic | en |
False. I returned the part that you removed. That part was sourced. So you removed it. Let me show you again: . Yes, you said that you didn't do it, but anyone can check. You also didnt put the right terms which were used in the judgement so I corrected it, based on the source that you presented. Regards. | toxic | en |
:::::C'mon, get a bang out of life... | toxic | en |
I find it amusing that I am accused of using multiple accounts when the only account I have is this one, however I am used to false charges being brought against be by B&Q.;
It has become apparent to me that wikipedia is not interested in a truth but more in advertising revenue. | toxic | en |
:Thanks, I'm humbled! | toxic | en |
Kenya tea workers strike 2007
I rated the Kenyan tea workers strike of 2007 article as per your request. Assessment comments here. Thanks for contributing to the organised labour project. | toxic | en |
"
I love ""Oh, my"" ... did you know I taught you that? " | toxic | en |
re : asian option for pavel
stinson ,
let ' s talk about it . it seems like an open personality clash developing
for the first time in the history of the group .
vince
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by vince j kaminski / hou / ect on 05 / 02 / 2001 03 : 12 pm - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
zimin lu
05 / 02 / 2001 01 : 41 pm
to : paulo issler / hou / ect @ ect
cc : ( bcc : vince j kaminski / hou / ect )
subject : re : asian option for pavel
our convention is whoever finalizes the model should write the documentation . it does not make sense
to write one when changes are anticipated . you have been working on this almost a year , it never
strikes you that we need a documentation ?
i created exotica . xll , does that also give you an excuse not working on exotica documentation ?
zimin
paulo issler
05 / 02 / 2001 11 : 52 am
to : zimin lu / hou / ect @ ect
cc : tai woo / enron @ enronxgate @ enron , pavel zadorozhny / enron @ enronxgate
subject : re : asian option for pavel
i am surprised that we do not have the documentation ready .
i can make that for you . it is not there because you did not put that together by the time it was created and all the changes i have made did not required changes on the functionality .
paulo issler
zimin lu
05 / 02 / 2001 11 : 29 am
to : tai woo / enron @ enronxgate @ enron , paulo issler / hou / ect @ ect
cc : pavel zadorozhny / enron @ enronxgate
subject : re : asian option for pavel
tai woo ,
here are the c - codes for the crudeapo . ' sig ' is the spot
volatility meaning the price volatility within the delivery period .
you should consult with pavel for the definition of this " extra " parameters . we
would like to see the position monitor once you get it running .
we might have some additional suggestions .
paulo ,
why don ' t we have a documentation on crudeapo you worked on ?
i can not find it in exotica help file . please supply that to tai , thanks .
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
from : tai woo / enron @ enronxgate on 05 / 02 / 2001 09 : 55 am
to : paulo issler / hou / ect @ ect
cc : kara maloney / enron @ enronxgate , zimin lu / hou / ect @ ect
subject : asian option for pavel
this morning , zimin told me that pavel is using a special model in evaluating his asian option portfolio .
he asked me to talk to you in order to access to the code so that i can see the difference made to the model .
as i cannot find the doc . describing this model , please tell me what that new input parameter ' sig ' is .
thanks , | scam | en |
Umaria's real name is Umar.farooq he known as Umaria. he love football and his favourite football team is Real madrid and his favourite player is CR7 | toxic | en |
[aside from those with my mentor in our talk space] | toxic | en |
Freezing my nips off out here... | toxic | en |
"
:It's a really really long discussion. In short, It is ""interpretation"" rather than bare plot description to assert that the sunlight is what triggers the signal, and as such saying so should be avoided in the plot section. However, in sections of the article devoted to interpretation of the film, discussion of this would be appropriate. That's the main point.
:Furthermore, given the position of Clavius on the moon, and the position of the sun as the shuttle approaches the moon monolith, it's reasonably evident that the final shot of the sun directly over the monolith is impossible (though sunlight touching the monolith from another angle per se might be). So it could be something in someone's mind. " | toxic | en |
"
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Mufka (talk) [[Special:Contributions/Mufka|(contribs)]] " | toxic | en |
Translation WITHIN Wikipedia is a diffferent matter from translation under the GNU FDL. Contributors are implicitly giving additional permission (beyond the GNU FDL) to allow for the normal operation of the website under our longstanding traditions. So this means that while attribution is a courtesy, it is done for internal policy reasons and this has NOTHING to do with the GNU FDL. I do not think it is wise to have permanent links between versions in the actual article space, a mention in the edit summary is more than enough. | toxic | en |
"
::Not sure how one manages to bugger up a template but there we go , Anyway thanks ) – " | toxic | en |
Regarding edits made during March 13 2007 (UTC) to San Francisco, California
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, }} you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. | toxic | en |
:Well, ok. I'm going to go through and copy any sourced info from the album articles. Unsourced info will disappear from the album articles and here. Any future unsourced info will be reverted. - | toxic | en |
Talkback
Not to mention the requests here for responses, which you've just deleted. (t•c) | toxic | en |
Formating on my talk page
Thank you for formating my talk page, but if you could get the two vertical templates to show to the right of the TOC and without the white background that would be perfect! | toxic | en |
start date : 2 / 2 / 02 ; hourahead hour : 14 ;
start date : 2 / 2 / 02 ; hourahead hour : 14 ; no ancillary schedules awarded . no variances detected .
log messages :
parsing file - - > > o : \ portland \ westdesk \ california scheduling \ iso final schedules \ 2002020214 . txt | scam | en |
I'm not sure why you think the part you quoted is relevant. In the case of Politico, I don't think anyone is interested in Smith's opinion. | toxic | en |
[ILUG] app of the day - Spackle
http://spackle.xidus.net/info.php
>>From the website:
"Spackle is designed to be a flexible client/server architecture for the
gathering and displaying of statistics, primarily suited to monitoring
servers. It's written in PHP and bash shell script, uses RRDtool for stats
logging, and PostgreSQL for the server-side database. (soon to support MySQL
as well)"
I had this up and running within a few hours. The hardest bit was getting
PostgreSQL running as it's been a few years since I used it. I had a bit of a
problem getting it to work on rh6.2 boxes but I documented the changes here:
http://xeer.blogspot.com/?/2002_07_01_xeer_archive.html#79148596
Web interface is simple, but functional. It has a simple way of distributing
the monitoring scripts (which could be compromised but I digress), and the
resulting graphs are pretty!
Donncha.
--
Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug@linux.ie
http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for (un)subscription information.
List maintainer: listmaster@linux.ie
| scam | en |
, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
That is informative. Thanks. 14:49 | toxic | en |
For the full transcript see [Memorandum by an Official of the Foreign Minister's Secretariat.Füh. 57a. g Rs.Berlin, November 30, 1941.] Germany. Auswärtiges Amt. Title: Documents on German foreign policy, 1918-1945, Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1949- Description: Book v. fold. maps. 24 cm. Series D, Vol. XIII no. 515, F1/0018-24 | toxic | en |
, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
::;Duuude:
::Stop now, he is one paper away from a PhD in Gastronomy from one of the top universities in the United States. What are your qualifications?
To help you out:
::* In American English a green onion is also called scallions.
::* Daikon is white radish.
You need to read up on
* WP:Common names
* WP:Civil
* WP:MoS
* Dude
We'll talk after your block has expired.
( ) 20:56 | toxic | en |
"
Lololol
Evil. Haha. Well I just saw The Omen. Look behind you! — (Talk) " | toxic | en |
== You have mail == | toxic | en |
It looks good to me. Thanks! | toxic | en |
Publication date
Hi all.
My copy of this book is copyright 2002 while this article states it as 2003. So I should probably change it eh? | toxic | en |
Dan Reeves is in the Hall of Fame! Yes, absolutely this Reeves also belongs - his work with the Broncos alone makes him HOF material (note: the talk page nazis don't want these types of discussions - opinions and stuff but I see nothing wrong w. a little friendly chatter) | toxic | en |
REDIRECT Talk:Television in the United Kingdom | toxic | en |
"
2 reverts is not ""rapidly approaching 3RR"" and you know I don't care about your warnings, liar. " | toxic | en |
:::::::I went ahead and took out the length sign as well. It's certainly not phonemic, but add it back in if you feel it's justified phonetically. | toxic | en |
Lưu Ngu hoạt động vào thời kỳ cuối thế kỷ 19 và đầu thế kỷ 20 tại Trung Quốc, đặc biệt là ở các thành phố như Thượng Hải và Hồng Kông. | toxic | vi |
== Career Statistics ==
Someone, please update the Career Statistics, they are obsolete. | toxic | en |
== ჯორჯიან ალფაბეტ ==
გამარჯობა. ეგრე არ ქამოვა გექმა უნდა სევიმუშაოთ. შენ რო ამბობ ჯავაიშვილის თუ არ გჯერა წავედი მეო არაა სწორი გეტყვის წადიო დ. ხოდა ქეგმა შევიმუშაოთ უნდა მივატსვეთ იმას რო ქორიუნის ნაჯღაბნი არის შეცვლილი (ჩემი მთელი ცხოვრება ეგ მეგონა უეჭველი ფაქტი და ახლაც მჯერა. უნდა ვიპოვოთ ქართველი და უცხოური წყაროები მაგისთვის რო სასფიშნ არ ეწეროს |. ხოდა დალშე იმათ ვერ ამოვიღებთ ხო ხვდები უნდა დავუმოთ მანდ რამე სიტყვა ვაიდლი არ მომწონს მარა გამოვნახავთ რამე სიტყვას დ. და მერე უნდა დაიწეროს როგორმე რო არავის თავი არ შეუწუხებია ანფანების სედარებაზე, რაც მე მჯერა სხვათაშორის... და უნდა ადიწეროს ამაშტანავე რო ყველ ექრდონბა ქორიუნს. იდეაში პატარიძის წიგნი მაქ მარა მეზარება წაკითხვა დიდია დ.
ხოდა კონსრურქციულად უნდა მივუდგეთ რა. )
დაწერე რას ფიქრობ.
სოები სფეწიალურედ სევტსვალე ]] | toxic | en |
REDIRECT Talk:University of the Philippines Cebu College | toxic | en |
re : astros web site comments
infants under the age of 2 that can rest in a parent ' s lap do not need
tickets to games .
webmasters
at 12 : 17 pm 3 / 30 / 00 - 0600 , you wrote :
> posted = thu 30 mar 2000 at 12 : 09
> subj = astros web site comments
> mailto = twinspin @ astros . com
> email =
> namefield = daren farmer
> email = dfarmer @ enron . com
> city = spring , tx
> comments = do i have to purchase a ticket for an infant ?
> x = 48
> y = 7
> | scam | en |
april 1 noms
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by ami chokshi / corp / enron on 03 / 29 / 2000
03 : 16 pm - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
troy _ a _ benoit @ reliantenergy . com on 03 / 29 / 2000 03 : 00 : 00 pm
to : " ami chokshi "
cc :
subject : april 1 noms
( see attached file : hpl - apr . xls ) ( see attached file : egmnom - apr . xls )
- hpl - apr . xls
- egmnom - apr . xls | scam | en |
Rose needs water, season needs change, poet needs imagination..My phone needs ur sms and i need ur lovely frndship forever.... | scam | en |
You're right, I did delete the section on the 8th December, after MgeKelly inserted the Monty Burns factoid. He was possibly trying to get me to lose my temper, and he unfortunately succeeded.
The sequence of events thus runs this way.
You create a compromise.
Mgekelly vandalizes the article with the Monty Burns factoid.
I deleted the whole section and reinserted the factoid in the main body.
Please note that I deleted the section two days ''after you created it, on the 6th. Note that I was on wikipedia on the 7th, I saw the section then, and did not touch it.
So:I should not have deleted the whole section, I should have deleted only the Monty Burns vandalism, and I apologize for not having appreciated your early effort at a compromise. 03:43, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC) | toxic | en |
Central America Group
Blank Verse,
I hope to join the group one day, but am now too engaged elsewhere. | toxic | en |
Education
PLEASE keep the list of colleges in Pittsburgh a list of colleges IN Pittsburgh. If you are not familar with the area, don't edit this list. Greensburg, Washington, McCandless, and California are NOT in Pittsburgh. Please don't be offended when I enforce this. Also, a Pittsburgh mailing address does not mean that the school is in Pittsburgh. The address extends far (in some place a 20 minute ride away).
Thanks, | toxic | en |
Lưu Bị đã sử dụng chiến thuật giả mạo tấn công để lừa đánh quân của Cao Cao. Sau đó, ông đã tấn công từ phía sau và chiếm được Ích châu. | toxic | vi |
"
==Muhammad==
Sorry for the late reply, Matt. None of those authors seem to have anything about them to demonstrate they are reliable sources. No PhDs in Islamic studies, nothing but their own opinions and in some cases, popular history books. They should not be used to source anything other than their own opinions, or information about themselves. However, they are all notable, so sometimes their opinions will be notable enough to be discussed in Wikipedia. Even in that case we still need to use reliable sources - that is, not their own books, but some other reliable, secondary source commenting on their opinion. This was the problem at Criticism of the Qur'an, it was basically just a list of Spencer's personal criticisms sourced to his own books. He does belong on that page, but he should be referred to as something like, ""According to the New York Times, Spencer is one of the most prominent critics of the Quran. He has criticized so-and-so about it, according to this peer-reviewed article by a real Islam scholar."" As for a policy on this, I don't think there needs to be much more than WP:SOURCES already says: ""Articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy"". There are plenty of these about. If you see any specific cases where an unreliable source is being used, please let me know, and I'll try to help rectify it. / " | toxic | en |
French contributer of fr page de discussion
Hello, I don't know if you check your Discussion Utilisateur:Lima, but I've added some informations and comments. Please read it.
sincerely yours | toxic | en |
==Avblockeringsbegäran==
Hej, Kildor, BjörnBergman här. Du och de andra administratörerna har nu gjort ett misstag mot mig genom att såra mig, p.g.a. en felaktig blockering och nu ska ni genast avblockera mig. Ni blockerade mig för redigeringskrig och det var ju inte mitt fel, eftersom nån försökte sabba mina editeringar och då tvingas jag ju rulla tillbaka till mina editeringar. Hur kan ni då vara så dumma att du kommer och blockerar mig?! Hur kan ni vara så oförskämda mot en användare som ni vet är oskyldig, va?! Tror ni verkligen att ni kan blockera mig exakt när som helst?! Hur kan ni göra såhär mot mig?! Varför kommer du och anklagar mig när du vet att jag inte gjort nånting. Jag har inte trakasserat nån som säkert du skrev här, hur kan du ljuga så mot mig?! Jag har inte trackat nån, tvärtom! Det är ni som trackar míg genom att anklaga mig för saker som ni vet att jag är oskyldig till! Ni är mycket väl medvetna om det! Såhär är det, Kildor, när ni anklagar mig för redigeringskrig när det inte var jag som gjorde fel, kan inte jag behärska mig från svordomar och därför skrev jag en massa svärord på diskussionssidan. Nu vill jag be dig och avblockera mig för ert misstag. Ni kan ju inte hålla på och behandla mig såhär! Rent utsagt, jag tror ni mobbar mig! Det är exakt vad ni gör, för ni kan inte avgöra vem som fel och varför?! Gå och avblockera mig och det på ögonblocket. Du vet att jag inte gjprt någonting och du är mycket väl medveten om ditt misstag mot mig. Det är nog Rex Sueciae också. Om ni inte avblockerar mig, kommer era disk.sidor att fyllas med inlägg. Det kan jag lova er. | toxic | en |
Cool, thanks; I added a minor correction. | toxic | en |
"
Welcome
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of ''', such as the ones to the page Dirt, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the ""sandbox"" rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}}''' below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
*The five pillars of Wikipedia
*Help pages
*Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! " | toxic | en |
Of _course_ she is considering legal action. Can't have the truth out there. I mean, c'mon, telling the truth? To the voters? You nuts or something? | adult_sexism | en |
"Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.
Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and write articles, however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is ). Logging in does not require any personal details. There are many other benefits for logging in to Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can type {{helpme}} on this page and an experienced Wikipedian will be around to answer any questions you may have.
Please note these points:
* Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
* Please use a neutral point of view to edit the article; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
* If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do that.
* Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as: copyrighted texts, advertisement messages, and texts that are not related to that article. Both adding such unreasonable information and editing articles maliciously are considered vandalism. A user who repeatedly vandalises articles will be blocked from editing.
The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, ask me on my Talk page – I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia.
from Wikipedian: S " | toxic | en |
Not quite, he's announced that's where he intends to sign, but he can't officially sign until tomorrow. | toxic | en |
schedule crawler : hourahead failure
start date : 1 / 27 / 02 ; hourahead hour : 3 ; hourahead schedule download failed . manual intervention required . | scam | en |
":: I have to feel for this user as I have and had the same bullying pulled on me, with the same article. There seems to be a gang of them, ad they user names are reported frequently around the external Internet that behave in this manner. If you create a beginer edit they revert it, usually with no edit history comment. If you attempt to replace it, figuring it was a vandal (troll elsewhere) and your edit was correct, you get a nasty warning on your user talk page saying roughly ""you can't do that and you will get your butt kicked if you do it again"". If you persist in editing a few dozen other times, eventually somebody will tell you about BRD, so you try it. You go to the talk page and post your opinion only to be told by some of the same bully team ""opinions don't matter here"", followed by more cold warnings about being a vandal or other policy, du jour. Next time one attempts to edit and supplies sources for statements by professional people only to be reverted with ""not a notable source"" or ""we don't use primary sources to contradict secondary sources"". If you attempt to complaint you get another editor giving you a ban on your talk page and telling you you violated one of the 4,567 WP rules. Sometimes you would attempt to expose or list some of the bias and how it doesn't appear to apply to these bully team members only to get banned again for WP:BLP. I didn't know article rules could apply to editors personalities behing an imaginary tough edit name, disguise. Last time I attempted to disclose insults on my person and copied them to my talk page the nasty comments not only disappeared from mine and their pages, but the edit histories vanished, as well. I didn't know this was an option and appears quite deceptive as the wikipedia system seems to keep logs indefinitely. Apparently not for the few dishonest members of the bully team. I laid a complaint against one of this bully team and all I got was WP:Boomerang threats and WP:Stale and WP:BLP warnings from the offending bully, I complained about. I feel I am still suffereing from that as I get regularly visited by one of the same bully team, who hacks up my user page until I complain and then I get banned for WP:BLP or WP:3RR because they coud detect I was thinking about reverting one more time. Another good one is ""lack of collaboration"" on my own user talk page. My conclusion is that this bully team exist to attack IP editors on a fear and predjudice basis. This seems to be the usual psychology, on the Internet in forums and real life, unfortunately. People fear the newbie and the unknown, attacking to rid themselves the unknown. Most of the protection mechanisms are not available to IP editrs and are unknown. The more I educate myself on the ways of WP the more I realize they ren't not applied to IPs equally. I have been ridiculed so many times here I have toignore most of it, now. /rant off LOL 99.251.114.120
" | toxic | en |
== Victory Lap ==
10 years ago, I fought like hell to keep this article and others like it. Eat it, deletionist scum. http://variety.com/2014/digital/news/survey-youtube-stars-more-popular-than-mainstream-celebs-among-u-s-teens-1201275245/ | toxic | en |
Continuity error with date?
At the end of the episode when John and Sarah are talking about John being distraught from watching the video of her signing away her parental rights, Sarah states the date on the tape: June 8, 1997. It's also the date that Sarah broke out of Pescadero. Isn't this wrong? Didn't all the events in Terminator 2 take place in 1994? And June 8, 1997 isn't that far off from Judgment Day at the time, August 29, 1997, and Dyson in T2 was still working on the code for Skynet. Anyone else catch this and agree this was a screw up on the show's part? | toxic | en |
15, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
So in other words you are talking about junk DNA? 211.171.155.12
Junk DNA obviously is relevant for establishing lineages and ancestry clusters yes, in fact most cluster analysis is based on noncoding DNA haplotypes, and secondly not all coding DNA shows signals of selective sweeps, in fact as the article shows most coding DNA does not.User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 06: | toxic | en |
"
:I've dropped them a note. - " | toxic | en |
Are you another editor?
To avoid any misunderstanding here, I have to ask you the direct question as to if you are another editor who has established this new account for the editing of the Pershing article. it just seems very strange that a brand new user would start off editing a highly controversial topic and have knowledge of Wikipedia policy pages and how to in-link them. But, it is possible, so I am just asking this to clear up the air. Thanks for your understanding, thsi is not an attack against you - just asking for clarification. - | toxic | en |
REDIRECT Talk:Hunt House (St. Charles, Illinois) | toxic | en |
"Pete, it is justified scholastically because mainstream scholars have never accused Anthroposophy of being founded on rascist principles. Mainstream encyclopedias never accuse Steiner or Anthroposophy of rascism. Here's what Wikipedia has to say about it:
""In other words, views held only by a tiny minority of people should not be represented as though they are significant minority views, and perhaps should not be represented at all.
In particular, to elaborate on the last comment above, if you are able to prove something that nobody currently believes, Wikipedia is not the place to premiere such a proof. Once a proof has been presented and discussed elsewhere, however, it may be referenced.""
This is why I believe that the section on racism should not be a section. A mere couple of sentences is, in my opinion, too much, but I would be willing to compromise with that. Because the presence of race as a section on Steiner's page gives the article undue weight.
" | toxic | en |
I find your page racially insulting. It offends me when you state that you support the Indian Cricket team therefor i am reporting you to administrators and Harbhjan Singh | toxic | en |
. During the first season a 4 Part TV movie entitled: Nickelodeon Shows: Rugrats Diapered Duo Parts 1-4, it follows Tommy and Chuckie going n their biggest Adventure yet and meeting new friends and seeing new things and Places. | toxic | en |
re : your mail
zhendong ,
dr . kaminski called me back telling me that he would like to have you as
an intern student in his research department during the summer . please
write him an email as soon as possible to introduce yourself and letting
him know of your expected starting date and ending date . dr . kaminski ' s
email address is vince . j . kaminski @ enron . com
shi - jie deng
assistant professor
school of isye
georgia institute of technology
office phone : ( 404 ) 894 - 6519
e - mail : deng @ isye . gatech . edu
home page : http : / / www . isye . gatech . edu / ~ deng | scam | en |
I'm back from the ban cobi!
Hey I'm back. Gonna vandalize all day and no one can stop me! As you can tell I can't be stopped by banning. I'll be seeing alo tof you and the rest of the blacklisted admins for the next couple of weeks =P 70.149.218.192
Dougbiznatch! | toxic | en |
I'd have said "whose collaborator". The way you've put it makes it sound like she organised to have him killed. | adult_sexism | en |
Sign or be banned. It's really that simple. Continued interferance with this process will be held against your record, which I might add contains past violations. Under scrutiny this won't be in your favor. | toxic | en |
::Unfortunately, your edits do not meet Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View guidelines. They are not acceptable according to objective academic standards, as told you in your warning one month ago. Please cease and desist from adding non-neutral edits which glorify white supremacy. Otherwise, you will be banned again. | toxic | en |
"
Disruptive edits? No - only correcting a falsehood re-inserted by the perpetrator, who took liberties with the ""consensus"" decision that he was wildly off base. Even in a footnote, his original research that islands in the Fraser River are ""not actually part of the continuous mainland"" is fictitious and constitute digging in his heels on his position; I simply corrected his (ongoing) error and mis-use of language; he wants to mention the City of Richmond, not its main island (Lulu Island, which also includes about 1/3 of the City of New Westminster, namely Queensborough), yet his ""footnote"" spoke of Richmond as an island. I'm not the one making the disruptive edits. Franamax, who's familiar with the area, also concurs about the notion that freshwater islands are obviously part of the mainland and distinct from offshore islands such as Bowen; and that same footnote also re-digs in the false notion that dictionary definitions have anything to do with the meaning of the name. The RfC accomplished nothing, except the consensus refutation of any validity to his position, and rile my back up over something wildly silly in nature for no good reason; and the RfC closed, with the consensus that JimWae's position was wrong, but a footnote explaining , not asserting. JimWae simply went ahead and reinserted his original problem-content as if it were all peachy keen and he had won. But he didn't even get the English idiom ""contiguous mainland"" correct, I corrected that; he also wanted to centre on the City of Richmond even though that's not, in and of itself, an island (it's about 20); I simply pointed out the absurdity of what he had added by adding other things that didn't fit the dictionary definitions attached to ""lower"" and ""mainland"". If you give as license to absurdity, or tolerate it, then you have to tolerate absurdities ensuant on it with impartiality. Rivers and lakes are not land, but they are part of ""the mainland"", mountain peaks are not ""lower"", but they are part of the Lower Mainland. So either the RfC stands - with JimWae's assertions being dismissed as original research - or you are enforcing a selective interpretation of it forbidding anyone from altering what JimWae wants to add, even though his addition was not supported by the RfC. *A* footnote was tolerated by the RfC, or suggested by it. But nobody said ""let JimWae say whatever he wants so long as it's in footnote form"". And if he uses incorrect language/idiom, then anyone (including me) can correct it - the City of Richmond is not an island, and the expression ""continuous mainland"" is not the correct English idiom for what he thinks he's saying. It's that simple. You're welcome to reverse the consequent absurdities I've added; but if you do, and leave JimWae's false and original research as it is, then you have gone against the consensus of the RfC.....Lulu Island is in the Fraser River, not Georgia Strait, it's that simple; and the river is on the mainland, so what's in it is on the mainland.....if that needs to be explained in a footnote, it doesn't need to be explained in the way that JimWae put it; which was, again, simply his re-iteration of his original erroneous and original-research interpretation..... " | toxic | en |
This page is about a very important palace in the old and recent and contemperory Egyptian history. | toxic | en |
"
::::Fast work! I admire a person of integrity. Thank you much, ''' ' " | toxic | en |
I prefer my free days... Tues, wed, fri oso can... Ü ask those workin lor... | scam | en |
Re: Wifi query
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Gregory Alan Bolcer wrote:
--]Elias Sinderson wrote:
--]> 802.11b - 11Mbps per channel over three channels in the 2.4GHz range
--]> (also shared with microwaves and cordless phones)
--]
--]Microwaves, cordless phones and video-based baby monitors....
Well I dont have to worry about microwavers in the house. Ours died a week
or so ago and due to doing some research we will nto be getting anysuch
device in the near or far future. I mean even if one half of the crap it
is reported to do is true it s just not worth it for a quick cup or warm
chai.
Which brings me to the fact that finding a good Convection only (not combo
with a microwaver) oven of any good size is dang near impossible unless
you go up to the bizness sizes. thankfully there is Dehlongi of which
costco has thru thier online store.
Now of course the question is do we get it delivered to the old house or
the new one (yep we got our offer approved and are in the short run down
to a long mortage:) we close on oct 31. though the realestate agent says
t happens like that a lot, I still find it incrediably jolting to have
found a house inthe hood I want with the space dawn wants on sunday and we
are signing papers on tuesday night with a close at the end of the month.
Which of course means....wifi land for wsmf:)- )
So far I like the Linksys dsl/cable router all in one wifi ap. The Dlink
has the funky 22mb stuff IF you use all thier stuff across the net and the
way things go I cant say thats gonna happen for sure. Pluse the Linksys
stuff is all over the mass market sotres so I cna walk home with parts at
any time.
The fun now comes with a realization that with ATTbi cable as my main hose
tot he net offering up bwf might be a tad problematic....So i am thinking
of ways around/through/under that. the setup of the particualrs are far
form set in stone...any ideas would be welcome.
Also any portlanders.....party time.
-tom
| scam | en |
This link also explains the definitions and regulations of non formal education (it is in Spanish - No English!!!)
http://www.madrid.org/cs/Satellite?apartado=4&cid;=1139836016398&idioma;=_es&pagename;=PortalConsumo%2FPage%2FPTCO_DetalleSectoresPageTemplate§or;=1139836019941 | toxic | en |
"===Canada===
In Canada, following consultation with all major religious groups, the Divorce Act was amended in 1985 to add Section 21.1 to give the courts have the power to dismiss any application, and strike out any pleadings and affidavits filed by a spouse who has failed to remove religious barriers to the remarriage of the other spouse. The legislature intended to:
place spouses on a more equal footing in civil divorce actions;
encourage women in particular to exercise fully their rights under the law; and
maintain the integrity of the Divorce Act 1985 by helping to ensure that refusing to accept or to give a religious divorce was not used as a bargaining tool to gain unfair concessions on child custody and access, or monetary support.
This reflects a general strong response at a federal level to any elements of duress or undue influence within the civil law system.
Bruker v. Marcovitz
The justiciability of a civil contract with religious overtonese is now being tested in the Supreme Court Case of Bruker v. Marcovitz. See Canadian Civil Liberties Association. http://www.ccla.org/pos/legal/
In 1969, the parties married in an orthodox ceremony. During the next 11 years they adopted two children after Ms. Bruker was unable to conceive. In April of 1980, Ms. Bruker initiated divorce proceedings. A link to the decision database is http://www.jugements.qc.ca/ and the full decision can be found with a text search for “Bruker” under “Cour d’appel”
In 1980, Mr. Marcovitz agreed upon a consent judgment for the divorce to appear immediately before Rabbinical authorities for the purpose of granting the religious Get. Shortly, after the civil divorce, Ms Bruker, personally and through various attorneys and Rabbis, asked Mr. Marcovitz to provide the get, but Mr. Marcovitz refused. Mr. Marcovitz opined that he refused to comply because he viewed Ms. Bruker's behavior since the divorce as harassment and an attempt by her to alienate him from his children.
Ms Bruker sued Mr. Marcovitz in 1989, seeking damages in the amount of $500,000 ""for having been restrained from going on with her life since de Decree Nisi [...], for having been restrained to remarry according to the Jewish faith [and] for having been restricted of having children"".
Marcovitz vs. Bruker (500-09-013353-032; September 20, 2005)
In 1995, a certificate of divorce was issued by the Rabbinical Court of Montreal with Mr. Marcovitz's consent and participation to the get. Despite receiving the get, Ms Bruker amended her action to increase the amount of the damages claimed to $1,350,000 and to include damages ""for the loss of consortium.""
Since Mr. Marcovitz was in breach of a judgment of the civil court, the lower court found that the matter could be argued before the civil courts and that Mr. Marcovitz had breached his contractual obligation to ""appear before Rabbinical Authorities. He awarded Ms. Bruker $47, 500 in damages.
On appeal, Justice Hilton, writing for the three member court, overturned the lower court judgement. The appellate court ruled that the obligation was religious in nature and so could not be judged by the civil courts.
""It matters not that the obligation was stated in the Consent that the Superior Court ratified, since the Superior Court could never have entertained an application for corollary relief under section 17 of the Divorce Act to require the issuance of a ghet. It is not at all unusual to see the parties in an agreement on corollary relief undertake to perform a variety of obligations that are not, strictly speaking, obtainable independently, but which are desirable nevertheless to the extent that they promote an amicable post-divorce environment.""
""While I recognize the usefulness of the inclusion of obligations of this nature in divorce agreements, it does not follow that they all automatically become subject to curial supervision and control, whether for specific performance or damages in the event of a breach. In my view, in order for such clauses to be enforceable, they must be directly related to one of the subje | toxic | en |
This isn't really advice so much as some IOIs newbies may not be familiar with. Everyone needs to start somewhere, and starting with a girl who shows interest in you is a damn good place to start. | adult_sexism | en |
"
To quote WP:IMGSIZE: ""the default results in a display 220 pixels wide (170 pixels if the ""upright"" option is used), except for those logged-in users who have set a different default in their user preferences. In general, do not define the size of an image unless there is a good reason to do so: some users have small screens or need to configure their systems to display large text; ""forced"" large thumbnails can leave little width for text, making reading difficult. In addition, forcing a ""larger"" image size at say 260px will actually make it smaller for those with a larger size set as preference. " | toxic | en |
:It is too abstract for this essential and concrete page about flip-flops. Please, place this data on a more appropriate page. , , email) | toxic | en |
The significance is that it is the only newspaper account of the event, and as such people may be inclined to doubt its existence or think it a hoax. By showing that it was reprtined in other newspapers, people can dee that it was indeed a real article, and can also see if the news had any national interest at the time. It's important for context. Damion | toxic | en |
start date : 1 / 13 / 02 ; hourahead hour : 2 ;
start date : 1 / 13 / 02 ; hourahead hour : 2 ; no ancillary schedules awarded . no variances detected .
log messages :
parsing file - - > > o : \ portland \ westdesk \ california scheduling \ iso final schedules \ 2002011302 . txt | scam | en |
"
The Ginge Offender
Hi there. I've added the """" template to the article The Ginge Offender, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:The Ginge Offender. If you remove the template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Regards, " | toxic | en |
made my ultranationalist and blind supporters | toxic | en |
Re[2]: A moment of silence for the First Amendment (fwd)
>>
>> http://www.post-gazette.com/columnists/20020905brian5.asp
GAB> I thought this nekkid URL was going to be about the
GAB> infringement of 1st amendment rights for broadcasters
GAB> and proposed campaign finanice restrictions preventing them
GAB> from making money on advertisements that are deemed
GAB> thinly veiled campaign contributions by some arbitrary
GAB> government board. As it was posted to "discussion" I
GAB> thought there'd be some.
GAB> Instead it's a Post-Gazette column by Brian O'Neill
GAB> lamenting the fact that some people know how to
GAB> fill out a permit so that they can take advantage
GAB> of their right to peaceable assembly. Obviously
GAB> he's poking fun at the idea that specific groups
GAB> get specific "zones" and that it's not up to the
GAB> police to decide what messages and signs get put into
GAB> what zones to most expediently keep order.
Oh thats right Greg. Because was explicitly clear that the pro-Bush
folks went out and did the permit dance. So where in the article is
this again?
Lets get something straight here. This -is- a First Amendment issue.
Public streets, provided one isn't blocking traffic, generally tend to
be sorta ok, at least from my last interpretation of Con Law a few
years ago (I'll feign ignorance wrt the fact that laws may have
changed, and the specific facts in this case are weak). IF this guy
_was_ merely holding a sign (which it seems was the case for all the
pro-bush folks) he did nothing wrong. He certainly didn't do enough
of a wrong to warrant a disorderly conduct charge.
I'll play with your perspective though. Lets assume a few things.
If I walk into the city office and tell them I want to peacably
assemble against Bush, do you think they'll give me a permit?
Probably not. So I lie. Then the cop does what happened in this
scenario. HE walks up, checks my permit and finds out that I
falsified my statement to get this said document. He arrests me.
End of story.
GAB> The problem is that politics have gotten so muddied
GAB> nowadays, that shouting down and unpeaceably disrupting
GAB> political rallies that you don't agree with has become
GAB> common practice. The courts have constantly ruled
GAB> that there are some restrictions on the first amendment.
GAB> They teach you that your very first year of law school.
I'll agree with Owen on this one. Muddied my ass. How hard is it to
chose between a Republocrat or a Demipublican? Not very. Shouting
down has grown to become the answer because the government, over a
span of years, and with the help of the Courts -has- limited the
rights we have as citizens under the First Amendment. If you
question the policy about terrorism, or drugs, or Iraq, or Bush in
general, you're aiding terrorism. If you challenge the beliefs of
the folks attending the various shadowy G8 conferences, you're an
anarchist, and you're herded off to a 'designated protest spot' miles
away from anything. Part of the point of speech is to be -heard-.
I can scream on my soapbox in the forest somewhere, and while thats
speech, its not effective speech. People are screaming and shouting
over the political figures because they cannot be heard in any other
way.
GAB> I think that given the information as laid out by the story,
GAB> Mr. O'Neill has confused free speech with action. Free
GAB> speech or even protected speech as practiced by almost
GAB> every American seems to involve the ability to communicate
GAB> an idea to an unknown audience. Action involves directing
GAB> a specific comment to a specific well-defined individual or audience
GAB> that has immediate, harmful, and sometimes physical
GAB> effects that is easily forseeable by any reasonable person.
Getting back to my original point. How do you communicate an idea to
an unknown audience, if you're miles from where the audience is? How
do you bypass the rules for being -miles- away from the audience
without violating the rules of the regime? I don't think Mr. Nell was
throwing pies at Bush. A sign, the last time I checked, didn't cause
physical injury, or even emotional harm. If I remember Cohen v.
California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971), its not the individual speaking that
has the requirement to desist, but the individual listening who has
the option to leave.
Just my .02, while its still considered legal.
--
Best regards,
bitbitch mailto:bitbitch@magnesium.net
| scam | en |
Amo a esa gente que me odia.. | toxic | en |
Antonov là một hãng sản xuất máy bay của Nga, nổi tiếng với các máy bay vận tải lớn. Chuyên môn của chúng là làm máy bay để chở hàng, không phải làm đồ chơi cho trẻ con như mấy hãng khác. | toxic | vi |
Stop Smokin' Bathsalt, Charlie Brown! rejectedpeanutsspecials | toxic | en |
:I think that notice was applied by mistake. | toxic | en |
User Page Revert!
No problem with the user page revert. I try to keep an eye out for those vandals who decide to step it up and start vandlizing user pages. I got you on my watch list so it will stick out! Keep up the great wikipediaing! | toxic | en |
inb4 someone says how do I know creeperweirdo doesn't know them. cause creeperweirdo wouldn't be asking wiki why she doesn't have a headstone otherwise. | toxic | en |
All characters need more relevant information
It has been months since I read this article, and reading it now I am disappointed.
All the information seems somewhat dated, and most of it needs more information, e. g. character development. I'd do this myself but I'm a lazy-butt and thought it would be better to bother your pointless lives. | toxic | en |
Re[3]: Selling Wedded Bliss (was Re: Ouch...)
EL> On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 bitbitch@magnesium.net wrote:
>> So Eugen, how many of your homo friends have -had- 3k lovers?
EL> Just one. Not everybody does that. Most of them are now dead, anyway.
Point is, you're not likely to extrapolate much. I could probably
find one hetero who had just as much sex. Does that mean we're all
rampant hos? No.
>> Eegads, if you're hypothesizing numbers like -that- Eugen, you at
>> least owe it to FoRK to back that shit up.
EL> Ain't done no hypothesizing. Anecdotal evidence'R'Us. Couldn't you just
EL> Google, or something?
Listen. If you pull numbers like that without a fact, the automagic
assumption is yes, they were extracted out of your neither orifice.
Point wasn't to conclude otherwise unless you had any relevant bits.
Its not my job to do _your_ bit searching for you, but I figured I'd
humor fork with this bit of finding:
http://www.thebody.com/bp/apr01/research_notebook.html (Pointing ot
averages of about 13 for every 3 months (for gay men), which totals to
about 52 a year. 52 a year doesn't equal 3000. Or even 300.
>> Just a quick assumption here. I'm not a math geek or anything, but
>> assuming 1 lover every day, that would be like at least one lover
>> everyday for 8 years and some change. I don't know about you, but
>> very very few of us are -that- lucky (or even close to that lucky)
EL> Which was my point. Gurls don't do hyperpromiscuity as a life style. It's
EL> interesting that you're launching into a diatribe, and threaten using
EL> instant argument (just add hominem) instead of assuming I might be not
EL> just pulling this whole thing out my nether orifice.
WTF do my shitty math skillz have to do with girls and
hyperpromiscuity? I was speaking -generally- meaning that guys and
girls probably have better things to do than boink everything they
see. As above, I am assuming you're pulling things out of your ass, I
just felt like calling you on it.
BTW, there's nothing wrong with calling someone on a silly idea. Its
allowed, and its generally not considered ad hominem, but the
homophobia statement might be.
>> and after awhile, even the sexaholics get bored and have to mingle
>> something new into their weekends. You really are assumiing that the
>> homosexual population is a) that large in a given area (The meccas
EL> You ever been to San Francisco?
Many times. Which is why I said 'assuming that large ... (The meccas
dont count). SF is a mecca in this example. I obviously wasn't
clear, tho one could assume I wasn't talking about Medina.
>> a few nifty gaybars, but thats a different story) b) that bored/sex
>> obsessed/recreationally free to pursue sex that often, with that many
>> partners or that they'd even WANT that many partners.
EL> This doesn't happen because it couldn't happen. No one would want to.
EL> Because you feel that way. Correct?
doesn't happen? true. Couldn't happen? who knows. It has nothing
to do with how I 'feel' and everything to do with the fact that people
do concern themselves with more than just sex (otherwise I think we'd
see a helluva lot more of sex, and a helluva lot less of everything
else).
>> Qualify yourself, or at least lower your outrageous numbers.
EL> I didn't expect so much reflexive knee-jerking on this list.
Well my suggestion is, if you can't take the responses, don't post
flamebait.
--
Best regards,
bitbitch mailto:bitbitch@magnesium.net
| scam | en |
Thank you. I will take that under advisement. | toxic | en |
January 2007
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. —n | toxic | en |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.