text stringlengths 1 299k | label stringclasses 4
values | lang stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|
Tiểu bang Catalonia. | toxic | vi |
Headline text
Cameron Ward DJ
Bold textCameron Ward is a little known radio DJ who is only of 16 years of age. He first started his career on Millside hospital radio as a member of the 'Jan and Jules' show team and broadcasted every thursday night from 6pm-9pm. He then struck out a solo career and moved to ashfield community radio where he had three different shows over 2 years. These were 'Saturday sport' which broadcast saturdays 5pm-7pm, 'LIVE MID MORNING SATURDAY/SUNHDAY' (depened which day it was) between 9am and 12 midday. Finaly he teamed up with nina squires to do the 'Super Sports Saturday Show' between 2pm and 6pm. He then left ashfield comunity radio in late 2005 to move to 'Regency FM' which broadcast on the internet. There he ran a show on saturday mornings 10am-1pm 'The Saturday Revolution Show', Which grew a cult following across north east derbyshire and bangor in Wales. Then sadly Regency Radio closed down due to lack of funds. It is speculated Cameron will move back to ashfield community radio or to Trust Fm which has now aquired a FM licence to broadcast across chesterfield and north east derbyshire.
Headline text
The Saturday Revolution!
Bold text The saturday Revolution had five main features. These were the sports up date, the Feel good factor, the film top ten, Phone call abroad and the revolution rewind. The show also featured up and coming bands from around Clay cross and chesterfield. Comedy Joel was a regular guest on the show and he and cameron usualy made for a good listen. The show had other guests Tyrone elton who helped out with the dart song selecta, Timy mac who was a musician, Lewis martin whos mum helped cameron to decide what to get his mum for mothers day. Other people involved with the show were: Dave Sadler (the producer), Matt King (the film reviewer), Joe Lawson ( Matts replacement when he was sick) and George glossop the resident gambler. | toxic | en |
Tylototriton or Tylotriton?
I'm confused - is it Tylototriton or Tylotriton? | toxic | en |
::Perfect analogy. I suppose he must be getting some enjoyment out of it though. He's been at it for a while. Perhaps he is attempting make a place for himself in some sort of Wikipedia vandal hall-of-fame. So maybe we (or I since I have brought it up again) should not even talk about it. Also I noticed recently, even after I neglected to even bother with warning the IP, you still quickly came in with the block. If you are on top of it, this may be best. I personally like the idea of not giving him the satisfaction of knowing we went through any more trouble than a single click. | toxic | en |
venue change - very important ! !
understanding and applying financial mathematics venue change - london ,
september 21 & 22 :
please note that i am faxing you a form which states a venue change for the
above listed course . just to reconfirm , the training course will now be held
at the following location : ?
the white hall hotel
2 - 5 montague street ?
london
wclb 5 bu ?
t 011 44 207 580 2224 ?
f 011 44 207 580 5554
please contact venue search to arrange your accommodations - 011 44 208 541
5656
?
to confirm your acknowledgement of this venue change , please either fax back
the form or respond to this email . please contact me with any questions you
have regarding the change .
?
regards ,
amy lamonsoff ?
conference coordinator ?
t ( 212 ) 925 - 1864 xl 48
f ( 212 ) 925 - 7585 ?
alamonsoff @ watersinfo . com
?
? | scam | en |
Only beautiful memories. | toxic | en |
A tag has been placed on Amol Chawathe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Amol Chawathe is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Amol Chawathe. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. t | toxic | en |
*Aynı dosyadan 3 tane yüklemişiniz bu yüzden diğer ikisi silinecek. Esas dosyaya birşey olmadı o silinmeyecek. Birde Türkçe yazarsanız daha rahat anlaşırız İngilizce'yi biraz unuttum. | toxic | en |
teen titans external links
on this part of i put an external link to a website about teen titans and other but you keep getting rid of it any reasons??? signed anonomous | toxic | en |
re : new production - sitara deals needed
vance ,
deal # 348616 has been created and entered in sitara for samson lone star
limited . meter # 9847 is not yet available in sitara and i am awaiting
additional information from you on hesco . thanks .
bob
vance l taylor
07 / 28 / 2000 01 : 24 pm
to : robert cotten / hou / ect @ ect
cc : lisa hesse / hou / ect @ ect , trisha hughes / hou / ect @ ect , heidi
withers / hou / ect @ ect , hillary mack / corp / enron @ enron , susan smith / hou / ect @ ect ,
donald p reinhardt / hou / ect @ ect , melissa graves / hou / ect @ ect
subject : new production - sitara deals needed
bob ,
the following production is now on - line and a ticket should be created and
entered into sitara based on the following :
counterparty meter volumes price period
hesco gathering oil co 9835 600 mmbtu / d 96 % gas daily less $ 0 . 14
6 / 10 - 7 / 31
samson lone star limited 9845 3000 mmbtu / d 100 % gas daily less $ 0 . 10 7 / 21 -
7 / 31
winn exploration co . , inc . 9847 800 mmbtu / d 100 % gas daily less $ 0 . 13 7 / 25
- 7 / 31
( for fuel use less 3 . 35 % of del vols )
fyi , susan has created and submitted committed reserves firm tickets for the
remaining term of the deal beginning with the month of august . additionally ,
these are producer svcs . deals and should be tracked in the im wellhead
portfolio . . . attached to the gathering contract .
thanks ,
vlt
x 3 - 6353 | scam | en |
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Man, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. | toxic | en |
"
I agree with that as well - however, in a new article of its own. Perhaps Xianqi openings? After that's been written, add a notice to this article. Thanks! (A note?) " | toxic | en |
Dispute resolution is the same thing as requesting a third opinion. Plus, it's likelier that somebody whose efforts you actually respect will get involved. That's my perspective on things. | toxic | en |
Removing bullets from species split and accepted by the International Ornithological Congress, OBC, James Clements, etc. | toxic | en |
Shakira's sales
Hi, I am just ussing the sales Shakira has in her OFFICIAL WEBSITE http://www.shakira.com/biography/ and a report from BMI: http://www.bmi.com/news/entry/535199 . There they said that Londry Service has sold 13 million not 20 million.
These are official sales from official sources, I think you can not change them from the sales you find in another article.
Sorry for my english. Thanks | toxic | en |
eastrans nomination change effective 9 / 8 / 00
please decrease deliveries to eastrans to 0 mmbtu / dy for 9 / 8 / 00
the redeliveries will be 0 as well .
the over - delivery quantity for the fuels cotton valley gas will be valued per
paragraph 3 of the contract price ( per mmbtu ) section in the transaction
agreement . | scam | en |
It's those biography and political articles you should watch out for. | toxic | en |
Thanks for commenting on the Rahm Emanuel article. My suggestion? Be bold! Make edits! Change it for the better! | Talk | toxic | en |
"
Your contributed article, Carlos Vives discography
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Carlos Vives discography. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Carlos Vives. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Carlos Vives - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ~Talk " | toxic | en |
, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
What, use a primary source? Are you suggesting that a WP article on Wells use his own writings as descriptive of his position? Some editors here are dead-set against that sort of thing. They say that Wells cannot be trusted, and they'd cite the rumor-mongering of a left-wing blogger. They wouldn't want to use Rev. Moon's actual words either. 06:21 | toxic | en |
The 3RR rule applies to a person, not an IP address. You will be blocked under this address too, if you revert again. - | toxic | en |
Hello again Mishae
Thank you for your link regarding fish articles. I shall have a look over them as soon as I can.
I hope this isn't too much of an inconvenience, but as you've been on Wikipedia a long time, I wondered if you would have a quick look over my edits on the Emperor Norton page? (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Emperor_Norton&action;=history). I have strong philosophical views on the actions and life of this man, and though I do not think I have allowed that to cloud my judgement when editing, it would be good to have a second opinion from someone with greater knowledge and experience of Wikipedia guidelines. Thanks. | toxic | en |
may nom
daren the stuff outlined in bold execpt for the helmerich and payne will be
spot tickets per vance due to no flow till after the lst . . all the engage
stuff in vances file will be spot deals as they were last month that totals
1904 . also in vances file is the eex corporation stuff that will also be
spot tickets that totals 12945 . every thing else is a go . let lme know if
you need anything else i am to please .
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by tom acton / corp / enron on 05 / 25 / 2000 08 : 21
am - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
vance l taylor @ ect
05 / 24 / 2000 05 : 57 pm
to : tom acton / corp / enron @ enron
cc :
subject : may nom
tom ,
here ' s the latest and greatest .
vlt | scam | en |
Thanks for your message
Hi Roby, thanks for the little welcome note you left behind. I (my company) use(s) MediaWiki for logging our work, taking notes, official documentation, project planning, ... and so on. So yes, I am reasonably comfortable with Wikipedia, and I will sign my contributions wherever necessary/ wherever I'd like someone to check with me in case s/he has different opinions on something I wrote. ) | toxic | en |
Roxy the dog, you are well respected member, Probably impossible to understand by anyone, who lied to you so that you protect
a misogynist RooshV who was named the most hated man in the world,
part of extremist and hate group, who is on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s extremism report, a privilege usually reserved for neo-Nazis and terrorists
Maybe you should read more about him, before editing his page and removing important
information about him.
Do you realize the effect that it has on your reputation, to support an extremist, mysoginist, have you even read his hateful works
and the interviews for Washtington Times or Daily Dot magazines and what RooshV constantly promotes? Have you read his books and his articles
and what Roosh constantly promotes? Do you realize the effect on your reputation to associate yourself with RooshV ? | toxic | en |
Come to my home for one last time i wont do anything. Trust me. | scam | en |
"
Perfect, thanks. ''SpielChequers'' " | toxic | en |
== Franking privilege ==
Coemgenus. Adding any reform is extremely tough under these circumstances. Grant was the only President to outlaw the Franking Privilege and this is deleted from the article. It does not matter if parts of the privilege were restored in 1875. Grant is beat up by scandals and he is not allowed one, no one tidbit of a chance. The scandals get several paragraphs but the reforms get only one paragraph. Editing on the Ulysses S. Grant artcile is becoming extremely difficult, even a one sentence edit, goes before the utmost scrutiny. I believe the deletion was unfair and uncalled for. I thought we had been working together. I can't edit under these extreme circumstances. Its time for me to take a break. Good luck with the article. Ownership of articles is against Wikipedia policy. | toxic | en |
You were asked to quote the movie which you have dodged around doing. The admins rule is perfectly admissable, and in the art of comprimise, i shall point out your not doing a very good job at it currently. Please remember, the rulling faction is normally the consensus when dealing with theorys. Accusing other users of conspiring against you is also meglomanical, i might warn you. I suggest you click this link here and read up about it, and avoid acting in this way, wether maliciously or in good grace. | toxic | en |
I already repaired that. | toxic | en |
Accents
Although the cartoon established Mario and Luigi to be from Brooklyn (a fact commonly accepted by fans, despite having never been mentioned in any games), Toad seemed to speak with a thicker Brooklyn accent. The accents weren't mentioned in the games, but the TV show was (presumably) a licensed product. Until Nintendo decided to go with an Italian accent, fans assumed the TV show (and later the movie) accent was the official standing. Only when Nintendo's products included digitized recorded speech did anyone realize Nintendo intended them to be Italian, not Italian-American. It's the same principle of updated canon that Star Trek and Star Wars licensed products run on. | toxic | en |
ok, i am sorry, but I do not agree with what is the Quran, I will be more tolerant of them but to be honest many Muslims I have met on the internet are hardly tolerant of any critical analysis of Islam. btw, do you know anything about byzantium? i am doing a article on Byzantine Medicine | toxic | en |
"
Look guys, I just checked with several doctors, three lawyers and a couple of judges and they all say that there are many questions they get which they only have a partial answer for or no information about at all and must therefore use their professional judgment and experience to provide an answer so that the right way to handle either a legal or to a medical question is to include a clear and simple disclaimer whether you are otherwise qualified to provide and answer of not.
In other words it is far better not to delete a question but rather to answer it to the best of your ability and then add a disclaimer even if you are sure your answer is one hundred percent provable by the facts. Otherwise you should simply leave the question alone and not answer it at all and instead remove the answers which do not include a disclaimer or may be contrary to facts.
Also, no one can be held responsible for providing an answer to a question, even if a disclaimer is not attached, in any scenario where the answer or ""advice"" is free of financial charge. In other words, unless you require something of values in exchange for your answer or ""advice"" you can not be held responsible for what your answer is.
This is of course not the case when questioned by a police officer or other official or officer of the court who represent the State and are seeking an answer on the State's behalf. If you choose to answer their questions then you are obligated by law to tell them the truth although you are likewise permitted to withhold an answer or to provide a disclaimer if you do not. " | toxic | en |
http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/wordofmouth/2010/mar/08/how-to-cook-perfect-sausage
http://www.sausagemaking.co.uk/
The water content of sausages is such they no longer explode | toxic | en |
"
Your submission at Articles for creation
Lauren Santo Domingo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Howdy! " | toxic | en |
"
:::::::::::Until 2005, virtually all sources on Pictish history indentified Fortriu with Strathearn, with little evidence, just because some authority had once said, ""It must be here"". The same is the case with all those who say Aeron is Ayrshire; no one offers a reason for it. I'm not saying I have proof of a negative, I'm saying that none of them who make that claim have ever offered any evidence to back it up, none, zero, nada, zilch, squat. It's an embarassment to them, and it's an embarassment to have it in this article. " | toxic | en |
sucks website ==
Link should be placed to to be fair, and show xkcd's supporters and detractors.
== XKCD | toxic | en |
:::Not all of them, some mixed families had the right to stay. | toxic | en |
Okay. Makes sense to me as the pressure group ‘July 7 truth Campaign’ who are very keen to include the new inserts I find most difficult to debate with. Here is how I see it as (a) the original author and (b) someone who has since met Power (who is reluctant to be involved in this matter):
The original article and attachments I researched were I hope, accurate and relevant. Not inspired by any hidden agenda. I was also grateful for a bit of Wikipedia help in the finished work. I also believe anything in this or any Wikipedia article should be not biased or linked to gratuitously antagonistic sources that only want to pursue their own cause. With these thoughts in mind two questions are now asked:
1. Is the final paragraph appropriately sourced?
2. Are any/all the external links suitable?
The final paragraph is indisputably from an organisation that is pursuing a personal and hostile vendetta against Power. Numerous websites confirm this. Indeed, the author does not hide the fact. I find it impossible to accept that any paragraph submitted by this group can be unbiased or not linked to antagonistic sources and a hidden agenda. But are these issues alone sufficient to doubt the source and suitability?
1. Is the final paragraph appropriately sourced? I consider the source has to be weighed against the relevance of the paragraph? What was or might have been reported in a provincial newspaper almost a lifetime ago is not in itself an immediate point of challenge, although it could be. The substance however, is even less newsworthy than say someone who is found not guilty of a minor traffic offence. Power in this sense, was never charged, summonsed or even disciplined. I can confirm from the subject of the article that the CPS did indeed decide that no prosecution was required for an internal/administration matter. However, Power was a senior police officer which meant a full enquiry whenever any allegation is made was bound to occur, even though no charges were ever brought. But the local paper thought his rank merited comment. Otherwise, it was not in the least newsworthy. Within the context of an accurate and relevant article I believe this deliberately selective use of an otherwise distant and pointless news item is intended only to harm Power to suit the organisation that discovered it. Had they looked further there are other newspaper features over the years that tell of Powers awards for gallantry and leadership, but of course these do not support the reason why the ‘July 7 truth campaign’ want to publish this particular and I believe (at best) irrelevant paragraph.
2. Are any/all the external links suitable? Probably the ones that for many months linked to the wider exploits of Power and were not specifically selective, are suitable. They have never been challenged as they are from various sources without any hidden agenda. For example, those linked to all the BBC sites who have reported on Power’s previous actions - without bias. Now suddenly a hostile pressure group with a well known and personal vendetta against Power wants to promote itself by inserting its own external link. I suggest this is neither accurate nor relevant and seeks only to manipulate Wikipedia to promote a single course.
Since the eponymously called ‘July 7 truth Campaign’ has a keen interest in promoting its own view that nothing so far, has been truthfully reported about the tragedy in 2005, can I suggest they consider adding to the already very well covered article on that event, rather than be allowed to conduct a campaign of what appears to be character assignation far removed from anything that is accurate or relevant to the readers of Wikipedia. It seems from other contributors that I am not alone in this view.
I ask that the final paragraph and external link that now exists be removed and we revert to what was previously published. | toxic | en |
:::::::::I am sick to death of kids like Arthur chucking their ignorant weight around. I for one would welcome a wider discussion of his behaviour. | toxic | en |
"
Yeah, I'm pretty sure that would be allowed. That's how we do music video screenshots, so. P (Which she also needs... let's hope we get a DVD with all her videos with this GH). — { " | toxic | en |
Guy has be groping Ohio women since the '80s: [URL] He really NEEDS a new hobby. | adult_sexism | en |
i c u gave up
aw r u chiken? | toxic | en |
I don't know who you are. This article contains personal informations and defamatory claims related to a living person. Please, do not create similar pages, this is an encyclopedia. Thank you. | toxic | en |
why do u delete my page???
it is true....
i have not breached the laws
so let it be | toxic | en |
Well at least the relevant passage(s). I think most German to English machine translations are ok, but one of the passages confused the machine translations because of an idiomatic phrase, and the other one was a problem because of complex sentence structure interacting with sarcasm. The machine translations mostly supported the wrong interpretations that people wanted to include, but the a human fluent translation does not. I don't want to go through that again. | toxic | en |
== Putting photos reg: ==
A Roman Catholic Fanatic Idiot is trying to add Alphonsa and Chavara to this page. Please think what is their eligibility to be included in this page. Please include those guys in the church portal. Those who are shown here are outstanding persons in their field. WHAT IS THE ELIGIBILITY OF ALPHONA AND CHAVARA?. | toxic | en |
"
==Hate to be the Eggheads who demoted Pluto==
As a minister, I firmly believe when the Bible says in Genesis ""God created the heavens and te earth"". I would hate to be the atronomers when their Judgement comes and God asks them why they, puny humans, demoted HIS planet!!!!" | toxic | en |
"
Removal of The Mesothelioma Society
I put a link to the The Mesothelioma Society ( I have read about 80 sites covering mesothelioma and I thought their coverage is the best of the 80 sites. Someone removed the link, citing general Wikipedia guidelines but did not mention any specifically wrong with the site. It is clearly not a lawyer or spam site. So I have undid his deletion. If anyone believes that sites is not appropriate, I would love to hear why.
James, this site adds nothing of value to this article. I see zero useful, reliable content to supplement our article. It doesn't look like anyone is linking to it from off-Wikipedia, either, (other than a comment spammer):
Neither these other associated sites sites you (or someone) added anonymously to our Fentanyl and Celecoxib articles:
Interestingly, a reader can't tell where this ""Mesothelioma Society"" is located or even, without a subpoena, who registered its domain name.
Accounts adding one or more of these links:
Please do not add any of these links again. Refer to the links in the warnings you received for more information on editing at Wikipedia.
Here's a link to the associated report: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam#""The Mesothelioma Society"" (talk • contribs)
Ir ia unclear to me how much A.B. has even read this site. I have not found a better gloassary on any other site, their treatment discussion is excellent, and they have a good unbiased list of doctors. I am adding it back. Please do not delete this link again.
Compare texts:
""© 2008, Baron & Budd, P.C."" (law firm)
""Copyright © 2007 The Mesothelioma Society""
Compare the first 274 words
(not copyrighted)
""© 2008, Baron & Budd, P.C."" (again)
hubpages.com/hub/Asbestos-Cancer-Facts-and-Historical-Information
compare third paragraph of the hubpages.com page
Compare the ""Mesothelioma Society's"" third paragraph with the hubpages page's second paragraph. The plagiarism even includes the same grammatical mistake: ""All to often, individuals…""
See:
Wikipedia:External links#Restrictions on linking
Wikipedia:Copyrights#Linking to copyrighted works
When someone fills out the contact form requesting help on the ""Society's"" website, who gets it? It's worth a lot of money to American asbestos lawyers looking for new clients. The same is true for leads from the fentanyl and celebrex web sites; both drugs are now involved in expensive litigation in American courts. To get a sense of this ""market"" for web traffic and new legal clients, search Google for each of these terms, then look at the Google ads on the right side of the results page: Fentanyl, Mesothelioma.
Also, note the text of fentanyladvisor.com's privacy policy page:
""Not Found… Sorry, but you are looking for something that isn't here.""
(talk • contribs | toxic | en |
Support The other islands only have their own sections as part of the Isles of Shoals article, why does this merit a separate article? | toxic | en |
@neiln he edits every edit I do even the real ones that are truth | toxic | en |
It appears that you two obviously should get along well together!. | toxic | en |
Allow me to make one thing clear - I do not care whether or not My New calculus is published on Wikipedia. No one takes Wikipedia seriously anyway. I discussed it because I was asked. In fact I have been discussing the topic of infinitesimals and kept returning to the topic. Besides, what's preventing you from deleting all these edits? I expect that's exactly what will happen eventually.
Your assertion that the statement is true only whenever the right hand side exists is false. This statement refers to symbolic derivatives and of course both sides must exist for it to be true, not only the right hand side. The propositional logic applies both ways, that is, given f' + g', it must be true that it equals (f+g)' and vice versa.
12.176.152.194 | toxic | en |
power market research
this piece from deutsche bank is good macro overview of electricity supply / demand fundamentals . a little on the long side - 78 pages , but has some good discussion on nerc ( north american electric reliability council regions ) , beginning on page 15 . | scam | en |
Because of commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:HIV Virion-en.png?? You seem to be lost, it does not have anything to do with enwp. / | toxic | en |
in a reasonable manner | toxic | en |
sockpuppet, i reverted your vandalism
last time i checked, usa is still a free country. you have no rights to delete my questions. if you have free time, i suggest you to do some volunteer work in real life. you are going nowhere wasting time online. oh, yea, i reverted your vandalism. next time, you will be reported for vandalizing the page. | toxic | en |
Do you think that should be in the article at all. | toxic | en |
An encyclopaedia is populated by encyclopaedic content articles, that is, articles about subjects which describe (in this case) a. global concepts such as paramilitary forces, b. generic concepts such as the various types of paramilitary forces, and c. specific concepts such as the national forms of paramilitary forces, that in the United Kingdom were called militia.
Narodnoe Opolcheniye does not fall into any of these categories because it is not a paramilitary organisation formed and maintained by the state in times of peace for service in war. In Russia, and the Soviet Union, it was only formed by the population in times of war.
User Buckshot06 fails to comprehend this in his attempt to pigeon-hole this article into his frame of understanding, and in his dogged attempt to fit everything in the World covered by Wikipedia into the English language equivalents regardless of actual loss of meaning, context or sourced support for such attempts. The suggestion to merge is therefore not even something that needs to be considered within the framework of Wikipedia objectives, never mind the guidelines for merging articles.60.229.48.79 | toxic | en |
"
== Help! BA to SJU! ==
Many people continue to insist that BA to SJU is a resumption. BA LEFT SJU over 10 years ago! Resumed should not be used at all. THis is getting old, help please. Look at WP:AIRPORT's discussion page. This needs to stop. It is New. Simple as that. Thanks ''' " | toxic | en |
Egyptian lawyer jailed for saying women in ripped jeans should be raped [URL] #Muslims #IslamicTerrorism #Egypt #Women #terrorists | adult_sexism | en |
Coal Chamber-Sway
I was listening the somg Sway by Coal Chamber, and it had the same lyrics as Fire Water Burn. Can anyone confirm? | toxic | en |
Ryan
Hello Brian, how are things?
I was wondering if you could take a look at Rex Ryan whom I've nominated at FAC when you have some spare time. Thank you. Talk | toxic | en |
The 'battle' section is poorly written and could really use an overhaul. - March 2013 | toxic | en |
"
==Chambering?==
If this derringer dates to 1860, how is it chambered in .22LR that was introduced in 1887?Surv1v4l1st | " | toxic | en |
Okay, why is there a wikipedia article on video games in the first place? Who even cares about them? | toxic | en |
"
==Sockpuppetry case==
{| align=""left""
||
|}
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Spies sappin my sentries for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. " | toxic | en |
"
Block
Thanks for clearing that mad /16 block so quickly last night. I woke up this morning thinking ""Gosh! I did that?"" and just checked the log now. |Talk 13:57, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)" | toxic | en |
. The only thing I can think of that made them different was that they had self-confidence, | toxic | en |
A heads up
I just wanted to let you know that I have reverted your last edit to Talk:Blood of the Fold per my interpretation of wikipedia policy. I know this is rapidly becoming a pain in the ass but it is my conviction that this is the correct course of action and I apologise for any grief. | toxic | en |
My point was not that the artixcle should remain as it is, but that it should change to mirror the others. It should not be exclusively about Jewish-Christian relations, but should, for example, include the persecution of the Samariatans, especially uder the Hasmoneans, and the forced conversions of Edomites by John Hyrcanus, along with later events. These should be discussed as historical events usually are - with due regard to the variety of views existing among scholars. | toxic | en |
why did you delete my page in wikipedia?
Elnaz Rezaei | toxic | en |
Beating a woman is almost as bad as saying NIGGER right Hulk? | adult_sexism | en |
Thank you, Mendaliv. I agree. | toxic | en |
"User:Ling.Nut has got his Sandbox (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ling.Nut/Sandbox) rewrite coming together. We've been working together on it and swapping ideas and suggestions, and I'm pretty happy with what he's got. My principle and perhaps only remaining concern right now is the concluding sentence in the lede:
""The unresolved political status of the Palestinian territories and their inhabitants, plus the concurrent refugee problem, are central issues of the ongoing Israeli–Palestinian conflict.""
I don't think ""unresolved political status"" is a good phrase, because while true from a certain point of view, this could be interpreted by unfamiliar readers as meaning the territories are disputed, which is not the case. I've proposed a few alternatives:
""Another lasting consequence of the war that has had enormous repercussions and which helped establish the Six Day War as a watershed event in the Middle East was the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territory, which continues to this day.""
""Another consequence that established the Six Day War as a watershed event in the Middle East is the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories.""
""The Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories and its repercussions for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is another consequence that established the Six Day War as a watershed event in the Middle East.""
Would like other editors' input on this. My main concern here is that to note consequences of the war in the lede but NOT mention the occupation would be a huge error of omission, since one could very easily argue this is the single most consequential result of the war, with incalculable repercussions, and not only for just the Middle East.
" | toxic | en |
"
A tag has been placed on Eddy Pettybourne, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. " | toxic | en |
Hallo Hans555
the article about Lauterbach has progressed very much - you have done a nice work, - i will try to translate it for the french version in the next weeks. 12:52 19.5.2007 (CEST) | toxic | en |
RE: Slaughter in the Name of God
> From: yyyy@spamassassin.taint.org [mailto:yyyy@spamassassin.taint.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 9:50 AM
> > ... we've been fighting the War on Terrorism for as long
> > as there's been commerce, so you'd think we'd /realize/ that
> > escalation of violence is not a solution.
>
> Well said!
>
> --j.
Yeah. It certainly wasn't a solution to the Carthaginian problem or the
Barbary Pirates. Wait ... no ... actually ... it was a rather permanent
solution.
| scam | en |
: is a typical wp:truth book written by Madgearu. I'm going to revert you now and please stop edit-warring all over wikipedia. | toxic | en |
Let the gloating begin
LOL. Thanks for helping me gather information on the depth of corruption in Wikipedia Dude ... | toxic | en |
Đĩa LP đầu tiên của ban nhạc Bee Gees được phát hành vào năm 1967. | toxic | vi |
Cena đã thắng JBL trong trận đấu WrestleMania 21 để giành chức vô địch thế giới WWE. | toxic | vi |
"
AJA continually reverts with stated intention not to talk it over, and with continued uncivility directed at myself and others. Why you ""appreciate"" such efforts is beyond me. Considering his refusal to discuss on the talk page, I think your strict interpretation of policy in this instance is a bit much. " | toxic | en |
Suspected sock puppetry:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:General_Electric#External_link
User refuses all logic; possible conflict of interest. | toxic | en |
. You got a brain. You know things. Contribute | toxic | en |
Would Henrik be OK if we put a notice box at the top of this page to explain the situation? That would help at least those users who can read. I must admit, I check pretty regularly to see if the tool is up again. It's all about me! ) | toxic | en |
Por favor | scam | en |
Sheâs mousy as all get out, too. I guess that probably makes her bitter as hell... | adult_sexism | en |
"
:: no worries. '''''' " | toxic | en |
feedback forms
vince ,
here are the feedback forms for the following :
vp and md
manager and professional
administrative support
let me know if you have any other questions .
norma
x 31545 | scam | en |
"If it was Weller who removed it...he will keep removing it no matter what sources you have etc. Doug Weller is doing it to hundreds of other articles. One of the History channel's TV hosts recently mentioned Doug Weller in a interview about how Doug Weller doing Alot of other editors like this. I've had admins review my edits in talk pages before adding them to articles..they be approved for inclusion from wiki admins and instant Doug STILL revert them and act like they never been discussed. The reason he will not let you put the stuff in the Georgia article is because of Scott Wolter. Doug Weller has been on alot of other websites since 2009 saying bad stuff about Scott Wolter of the history channel...and continues to remove stuff from anything Scott discusses.
Even if you get Admins to approve your edits...Weller will still remove them.
""In an interview on March 25, 2013 the host of the History Channel’s new hit series, “America Unearthed,” Scott Wolter, stated that he had demanded that Wikipedia remove his biography because its editors had allowed so many false alterations to its contents. Wolter had sent them the true facts on his career, but the editors of Wikipedia refused to eliminate the recent anonymous edits. Wolter added that immediately prior to the premier of ""America Unearthed,"" several articles he had written or contributed to in Wikipedia had been simultaneously “gutted” or deleted by a self-appointed Wikipedia editor in rural England named Doug Weller. Wikipedia provides little information on Doug Weller other than that he has been designated a “purple gatekeeper.” Weller has no professional qualifications in geology. Until 2006 he claimed to be an archaeologist, but withdrew that claim when exposed. Surprisingly, Weller has also been editing Wikipedia articles about the history of the Southeastern United States. These activities will be described in a following section."" Richard Thornton
" | toxic | en |
== Review ==
Please review the edit that you just reverted on WP:ANI. It removed a copyright violation which had been complained about by the copyright holder and it removed the outing of a user's identify. Please revert your revert. | toxic | en |
== India quick links ==
| | toxic | en |
Please stop adding links to non-existent Wikivoyages pages
Please only add these links where there is actually an article on Wikivoyages. Thanks | toxic | en |
The Capital Hill Blue only covers unmentioned stories, and it's not a tabloid newsprint, like The National Enquirer, at all. | toxic | en |
PROTECTOR M151
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as PROTECTOR M151, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.kongsberg.com/eng/kda/products/dynamicsystems/RemoteWeaponStation/. As a copyright violation, PROTECTOR M151 appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. PROTECTOR M151 has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:PROTECTOR M151. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at PROTECTOR M151, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. (talk/) | toxic | en |
"
Articles for deletion/Fruit (slang)
Copy deemed personal attack and removed from discussion page: I believe that LtPowers was coerced into making his statement of defense. Here's how it happened: the fruity editor Benjiboi seeks to impose her queer agenda here at WP, i.e., to include anything and everything related to queerdom whether or not it's notable or sourced. Any editor who questions her edits, additions, ideas, etc., whether or not warranted, is branded a homophobe, or a homophobic vandal (whom she must ""fight""). Instead of defending her work on the strength of its merits, apparent or lacking, she cleverly, and sometimes not subtly, transforms the issue to: ""if you're not with me, you're against me!"" And so the focus of the discussion here shifted from whether to include her work to whether Powers is a homophobe, and how dare Powers attack sick, tired Benjiboi. And this arouses everybody's sympathies for poor, poor Benjiboi. Yeah, now it's ""I'm on a break, I'm off to rest from fighting those (omnipresent) homophobic vandals."" What's next? ""My white count is way off (so give me what I want)"" or how about ""I'm throwing up my meds (so let me have my article)?"" Oh, and how commendable that she still edits here while on break from battle what dedication! Look, I'll say one thing for Benjiboi: she is a skillful manipulator. But enough of her duplicitous bullshit already, the article will never be anything more than an exhaustive definition. As such it belongs in the dictionary.
You see, you haven't duped everybody here. " | toxic | en |
Please be civil! How many times have you been told this? You do not have monopoly on truth or what to be published or not on Wiki. Maybe you nad others have noticed that your actions and way of handeling things have created several alternatives to wikipedia? Stop you activities or you will destroy the wonderful idea of an open and free Encyclopedia on Internet. | toxic | en |
The RBA is bound by the Reserve Bank Act 1959, and while the bank has certain freedoms to direct monitary policy, it must report to the treasurer and in matters of disagreement the Governor General can intervene and if need be force the bank to implement changes to its policy, so the RBA isn't a law unto itself (perhaps more akin to a stubborn teenager who will direct all efforts towards trying to get away with whatever it can and never admit to being wrong). It is important to distinguish the RBA from the US Federal Reserve, because as I understand while the Fed Act Section 31 reseves the right to amend or revoke the Act by Congress, there doesn't appear to be anything about accountability beyond reporting to Congress (Congress doesn't appear to be able to overrule policy without amending the Act, wheras in Australia there is a legislated procedure for disagreements).
sources:
| toxic | en |
:Well, the impression I get from that site is that they're just issuing a disclaimer for their use of second-hand info, and directing any queries to the authors of the LoC Country Studies and CIA:WF material. It doesn't however say anywhere that the material from both those sources is unreliable.... | toxic | en |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.