Dataset Viewer
The dataset could not be loaded because the splits use different data file formats, which is not supported. Read more about the splits configuration. Click for more details.
Couldn't infer the same data file format for all splits. Got {NamedSplit('train'): ('text', {}), NamedSplit('validation'): ('text', {}), NamedSplit('test'): ('parquet', {})}
Error code:   FileFormatMismatchBetweenSplitsError

Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.

YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card

Check out the documentation for more information.

SOCrebuttal — Soil Organic Carbon Mapping (Geoderma rebuttal artifacts)

Architecture comparison, production maps, and supporting analyses for Bavaria-wide soil organic carbon mapping at LUCAS data scale (~16,360 samples). Published as the artifact bundle accompanying the manuscript revision.

Headline finding

A lightweight (~215k-parameter) CNN + Transformer hybrid is the recommended architecture at this data scale (Vanilla in the comparison table):

  • +0.23 R² gain from the CNN spatial encoder over a parameter-matched transformer-alone baseline (Lightweight).
  • 4× lower cross-fold variance than transformer-alone.
  • ~3× faster convergence (median best-epoch 7-8 vs 20).
  • No measurable benefit from the gated-residual mechanism on top of CNN+Transformer (SGT and Vanilla tie at matched hyperparameters; SGT is 1.7× larger for no R² gain).
  • 30× larger pure-transformer (SimpleTransformerV2, 11M params) matches Vanilla in mean R² but offers no other advantages.

See final_models/maps_comparison_2023.png for the cross-architecture production-map figure, and final_models/maps_comparison_2023_rebal.png for the KDE-rebalanced training variant.

Repository structure

  • sweep/ — Spatial-CV k-fold sweep RESULTS (per-config kfold_results_summary.json, per-fold metrics, sweep_ranking, README). Excludes the heavy .pth files — request "sweep-checkpoints" for those.

Methodology summary

  • Spatial cross-validation: 10-fold latitude-decile splits with a 1.2 km train/test buffer (Roberts 2017, Ploton 2020). The R² values reported in sweep/sweep_ranking.md are the honest generalization estimates.
  • Production maps: full-data training (95% train + 5% random monitor holdout — non-spatial, used only for best-epoch weight selection). All architectures inferred on the 1mil-point Bavaria reference grid for target year 2023 over a 5-year covariate window {2019, …, 2023}.
  • Rebalanced production maps (*_rebal): same architectures, retrained with KDE-inverse-density sample weighting on log(SOC) at α=0.5 (Yang et al. ICML 2021) to ensure organic-rich regions (Alpine peat, fen/bog) are not under-predicted.

Reproducing

All training, inference, and analysis scripts are in code/. Architecture source under code/architectures/; rebuttal pipeline scripts (run_kfold, train_full, infer_bavaria, sweep_submit, submit_finals, inspect_run, compare_maps) under code/rebuttal/.

Citation

Will be populated once the manuscript is accepted.


Last updated: fourel1@jpbl-s01-03

Downloads last month
510