Datasets:
Tasks:
Object Detection
Modalities:
Image
Formats:
imagefolder
Languages:
English
Size:
1K - 10K
ArXiv:
| annotations_creators: [] | |
| language: en | |
| size_categories: | |
| - 1K<n<10K | |
| task_categories: | |
| - object-detection | |
| task_ids: [] | |
| pretty_name: PlantSeg_Test | |
| tags: | |
| - fiftyone | |
| - image | |
| - object-detection | |
| dataset_summary: ' | |
| This is a [FiftyOne](https://github.com/voxel51/fiftyone) dataset with 1200 samples. | |
| ## Installation | |
| If you haven''t already, install FiftyOne: | |
| ```bash | |
| pip install -U fiftyone | |
| ``` | |
| ## Usage | |
| ```python | |
| import fiftyone as fo | |
| from fiftyone.utils.huggingface import load_from_hub | |
| # Load the dataset | |
| # Note: other available arguments include ''max_samples'', etc | |
| dataset = load_from_hub("Voxel51/PlantSeg-Test") | |
| # Launch the App | |
| session = fo.launch_app(dataset) | |
| ``` | |
| ' | |
| # Dataset Card for PlantSeg_Test | |
|  | |
| This is a [FiftyOne](https://github.com/voxel51/fiftyone) dataset with 1200 samples. | |
| ## Installation | |
| If you haven't already, install FiftyOne: | |
| ```bash | |
| pip install -U fiftyone | |
| ``` | |
| ## Usage | |
| ```python | |
| import fiftyone as fo | |
| from fiftyone.utils.huggingface import load_from_hub | |
| # Load the dataset | |
| # Note: other available arguments include 'max_samples', etc | |
| dataset = load_from_hub("Voxel51/PlantSeg-Test") | |
| # Launch the App | |
| session = fo.launch_app(dataset) | |
| ``` | |
| # Dataset Card for PlantSeg | |
| ## Dataset Details | |
| ### Dataset Description | |
| PlantSeg is a large-scale in-the-wild dataset for plant disease segmentation, containing 11,458 images with high-quality segmentation masks across 115 disease categories and 34 plant types. Unlike existing plant disease datasets that are collected in controlled laboratory settings, PlantSeg primarily comprises real-world field images with complex backgrounds, various viewpoints, and different lighting conditions. The dataset also includes an additional 8,000 healthy plant images categorized by plant type. | |
| - **Curated by:** Tianqi Wei, Zhi Chen, Xin Yu, Scott Chapman, Paul Melloy, and Zi Huang | |
| - **Shared by:** The University of Queensland; CSIRO Agriculture and Food | |
| - **Language(s) (NLP):** en | |
| - **License:** CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 | |
| ### Dataset Sources [optional] | |
| - **Repository:** https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13293891 | |
| - **Paper [optional]:** arXiv:2409.04038 | |
| ## Uses | |
| ### Direct Use | |
| - Training and benchmarking semantic segmentation models for plant disease detection | |
| - Developing automated disease diagnosis systems for precision agriculture | |
| - Image classification for plant disease identification | |
| - Evaluating segmentation algorithms on in-the-wild agricultural imagery | |
| - Supporting integrated disease management (IDM) decision-making tools | |
| ## Dataset Structure | |
| The dataset is organized as follows: | |
| - **images/**: Plant disease images in JPEG format | |
| - **annotations/**: Segmentation labels in PNG format (grayscale, where diseased pixels have class index values and background is zero) | |
| - **json/**: Original LabelMe annotation files in JSON format | |
| - **PlantSeg-Meta.csv**: Metadata file containing image name, plant type, disease type, resolution, label file path, mask ratio, source URL, and train/test split assignment | |
| **Statistics:** | |
| - Total images: 11,458 diseased plant images + 8,000 healthy plant images | |
| - Disease categories: 115 | |
| - Plant types: 34 | |
| - Train/test split: 80/20 (stratified by disease type) | |
| **Plant categories are organized into four socioeconomic groups:** | |
| - Profit crops (e.g., Coffee, Tobacco): 9 diseases across 3 plants | |
| - Staple crops (e.g., wheat, corn, potatoes) | |
| - Fruits (e.g., apples, oranges): 39 diseases across 10 plants | |
| - Vegetables (e.g., tomatoes): 45 diseases across 15 plants | |
| ## Dataset Creation | |
| ### Curation Rationale | |
| Existing plant disease datasets are insufficient for developing robust segmentation models due to three key limitations: | |
| 1. **Annotation Type:** Most datasets only contain class labels or bounding boxes, lacking pixel-level segmentation masks | |
| 2. **Image Source:** Many datasets contain images from controlled laboratory settings with uniform backgrounds, which do not reflect real-world field conditions | |
| 3. **Scale:** Existing segmentation datasets are small and cover limited host-pathogen relationships | |
| PlantSeg addresses these gaps by providing the largest in-the-wild plant disease segmentation dataset with expert-validated annotations. | |
| ### Source Data | |
| #### Data Collection and Processing | |
| Images were collected using plant disease names as keywords from multiple internet sources: | |
| - Google Images | |
| - Bing Images | |
| - Baidu Images | |
| This multi-source collection strategy ensured geographic diversity, with images sourced from websites worldwide. After collection, a rigorous data cleaning process was conducted where annotators reviewed each image and removed incorrect or ambiguous images, with cross-validation by at least two annotators and expert review for discrepancies. | |
| #### Who are the source data producers? | |
| Images were sourced from websites globally, representing diverse geographic regions, environmental conditions, and imaging setups. The original photographers/sources are not individually identified, but source URLs are preserved in the metadata for reproducibility and copyright compliance. | |
| ### Annotations [optional] | |
| #### Annotation process | |
| 1. **Standard establishment:** A segmentation annotation standard was created to ensure consistent labeling of disease-affected areas | |
| 2. **Annotator training:** Annotators were trained on the standard and required to annotate 10 test images for evaluation before proceeding | |
| 3. **Annotation tool:** LabelMe (V5.5.0) was used for polygon annotation | |
| 4. **Annotation guidelines:** | |
| - Distinct lesions: annotated with individual polygons | |
| - Overlapping lesions: annotated as combined affected areas | |
| - Small clustered symptoms (rust, powdery mildew): meticulously annotated to reflect disease distribution | |
| - Disease-induced deformities: also annotated | |
| 5. **Quality control:** Each image subset was annotated by one annotator, then reviewed by another annotator, with final review by expert plant pathologists | |
| #### Who are the annotators? | |
| - 10 trained annotators who passed qualification evaluations | |
| - Supervised by two expert plant pathologists who established standards, evaluated annotator work, and performed final reviews | |
| ## Citation | |
| **BibTeX:** | |
| ```bibtex | |
| @article{wei2024plantseg, | |
| title={PlantSeg: A Large-Scale In-the-wild Dataset for Plant Disease Segmentation}, | |
| author={Wei, Tianqi and Chen, Zhi and Yu, Xin and Chapman, Scott and Melloy, Paul and Huang, Zi}, | |
| journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.04038}, | |
| year={2024} | |
| } | |
| ``` | |
| **APA:** | |
| Wei, T., Chen, Z., Yu, X., Chapman, S., Melloy, P., & Huang, Z. (2024). PlantSeg: A Large-Scale In-the-wild Dataset for Plant Disease Segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.04038. | |