| { |
| "paper_id": "C69-1200", |
| "header": { |
| "generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0", |
| "date_generated": "2023-01-19T12:31:55.496514Z" |
| }, |
| "title": "", |
| "authors": [ |
| { |
| "first": "", |
| "middle": [], |
| "last": "Fa", |
| "suffix": "", |
| "affiliation": { |
| "laboratory": "FOR ~]ANTI TATI VE LINOUI STI C5 Stockholm dO", |
| "institution": "", |
| "location": { |
| "postCode": "SWEDF2V" |
| } |
| }, |
| "email": "" |
| } |
| ], |
| "year": "", |
| "venue": null, |
| "identifiers": {}, |
| "abstract": "", |
| "pdf_parse": { |
| "paper_id": "C69-1200", |
| "_pdf_hash": "", |
| "abstract": [], |
| "body_text": [ |
| { |
| "text": "The model that we arrive at is a particularly simple formulation of a discovery procedure for words. This formulation is part of n~ longer concern with the aetiology of ideas about linguistic units:", |
| "cite_spans": [], |
| "ref_spans": [], |
| "eq_spans": [], |
| "section": "", |
| "sec_num": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "text": "why does a linguist feel a phrase is a phrase and a word is a word?", |
| "cite_spans": [], |
| "ref_spans": [], |
| "eq_spans": [], |
| "section": "", |
| "sec_num": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "text": "The Word as a Distributional Unit", |
| "cite_spans": [], |
| "ref_spans": [], |
| "eq_spans": [], |
| "section": "", |
| "sec_num": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "text": "The status of the word as a linguistic unit is best sunmmrized by Greenberg: (1957) The word as a unit occupies a paradoxical position in contemporary linguistic science. Such a unit, roughly coinciding in usage with its employment in everyday language and in the discourses of sciences other than linguistics~ occurs almost universally in practice of descriptive linguists as the dividing line between the two levels of morphological (intra-word) and syntactic (supra-werd) constructions.", |
| "cite_spans": [ |
| { |
| "start": 77, |
| "end": 83, |
| "text": "(1957)", |
| "ref_id": null |
| } |
| ], |
| "ref_spans": [], |
| "eq_spans": [], |
| "section": "", |
| "sec_num": null |
| }, |
| { |
| "text": "Yet no generally accepted", |
| "cite_spans": [], |
| "ref_spans": [], |
| "eq_spans": [], |
| "section": "", |
| "sec_num": null |
| } |
| ], |
| "back_matter": [], |
| "bib_entries": {}, |
| "ref_entries": { |
| "FIGREF0": { |
| "num": null, |
| "type_str": "figure", |
| "text": "I want to distinguish between the behavior of language and the behavior of linguists in analysing linguistic data. The paper concerns distributional approximations to the word as a sequence of sub-word units. I will argue on the basis of what a hypothetical linguist might do with hypothetical linguistic data-in this case the frequencies of sequences of morphemes. The behavior of the hypothetical linguist is formalized into a quantitative model, which in turn is applied to real linguistic data: a primer, a lower school reader, and a well known tract on the philosophy of language.", |
| "uris": null |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
