| --- |
| license: cc-by-4.0 |
| language: |
| - en |
| task_categories: |
| - text-generation |
| - question-answering |
| - other |
| task_ids: |
| - open-domain-qa |
| pretty_name: 'CAP-Bench: Cross-Site Browser-Agent Benchmark' |
| size_categories: |
| - n<1K |
| annotations_creators: |
| - expert-generated |
| language_creators: |
| - expert-generated |
| source_datasets: |
| - original |
| multilinguality: |
| - monolingual |
| tags: |
| - benchmark |
| - agent-evaluation |
| - agents |
| - browser-agents |
| - web-agents |
| - cross-site |
| - gui |
| - llm-evaluation |
| - agent-as-a-judge |
| configs: |
| - config_name: default |
| data_files: |
| - split: test |
| path: data/test.csv |
| --- |
| |
| # CAP-Bench |
|
|
| **A Scalable Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-Site Browser Agents with Complex Actions and Perception.** |
|
|
| CAP-Bench evaluates browser agents on **C**ross-site workflows, complex **A**ctions, and challenging visual **P**erception. The full benchmark contains **420 tasks across 108 real-world websites** in 24 functional domains. Each task requires on average **7 complex execution operations** and **4 perception challenges**, substantially exceeding the difficulty of prior browser-agent benchmarks. |
|
|
| This Hugging Face dataset hosts the **public split (192 tasks)**. A held-out **private split (228 tasks)** is reserved for contamination-resistant leaderboard evaluation; see the GitHub repo for submission details. |
|
|
| ## 🔗 Links |
|
|
| | | | |
| |---|---| |
| | 🏠 Project page | <https://warriorxu0302.github.io/CAP-Bench/> | |
| | 🏆 Leaderboard | <https://warriorxu0302.github.io/CAP-Bench/leaderboard.html> | |
| | 📖 Paper | *arXiv preprint coming soon* | |
| | 💻 Code | <https://github.com/WarriorXu0302/CAP-Bench> | |
|
|
| ## Why CAP? |
|
|
| Real web browsing is harder than current benchmarks suggest. Modern web applications present two intertwined challenges that prior evaluations largely overlook: |
|
|
| - **Execution complexity** — completing a task often requires non-trivial UI interactions (dragging map regions, manipulating date-range sliders, navigating nested dropdowns) that go well beyond simple clicking and typing. |
| - **Perception complexity** — users must interpret rich visual content including charts, tables, images, and dynamically rendered elements to extract actionable information. |
|
|
| Compounding this, realistic workflows demand such interactions **across multiple websites**. CAP targets all three dimensions and pairs them with a **verifiable agent-as-a-judge** evaluation framework that scores agents against fine-grained execution and perception checkpoints rather than only the final answer. |
|
|
| ## Dataset Structure |
|
|
| ### Data fields |
|
|
| | Field | Type | Description | |
| |---|---|---| |
| | `task_id` | `string` | Unique identifier of the form `task-<6-hex>`. | |
| | `instruction` | `string` | Natural-language user request describing a multi-step, cross-site task. Includes desired output format. | |
|
|
| > Future revisions will additionally expose the structured metadata used in the paper (covered action / perception points, involved websites, functional clusters). Track <https://github.com/WarriorXu0302/CAP-Bench> for release notes. |
|
|
| ### Data splits |
|
|
| | Split | Tasks | Notes | |
| |---|---|---| |
| | `test` (this repo) | 192 | Public subset — use for development and reporting. | |
| | *(held out)* | 228 | Private subset for leaderboard evaluation. Submit results via the [GitHub leaderboard issue template](https://warriorxu0302.github.io/CAP-Bench/leaderboard.html). | |
|
|
| ## Loading |
|
|
| ```python |
| from datasets import load_dataset |
| |
| ds = load_dataset("Warrior0302/CAP-Bench") |
| print(ds) |
| # DatasetDict({ |
| # test: Dataset({ features: ['task_id', 'instruction'], num_rows: 192 }) |
| # }) |
| |
| print(ds["test"][0]["task_id"]) |
| # 'task-035e06' |
| print(ds["test"][0]["instruction"][:120]) |
| # "I'm writing a sci-fi script about AI ethics and want to systematically gather creative source material..." |
| ``` |
|
|
| ## Statistics |
|
|
| - **192** public tasks (this split) |
| - **108** real-world websites covered (full benchmark) |
| - **24** functional domains (full benchmark) — e-commerce, travel booking, academic search, real estate, code hosting, video streaming, news, healthcare, and more |
| - **~1,279** characters per instruction on average; min 601, max 2,495 |
|
|
| ## Evaluation |
|
|
| CAP ships with **CAP-Eval**, a verifiable agent-as-a-judge framework that: |
| 1. Generates a per-task Python evaluation script from each task's covered points. |
| 2. Materializes a hierarchical rubric tree of independently checkable execution / perception leaves. |
| 3. Has a judge agent extract structured information from the agent's answer and verify each claim against live webpages. |
|
|
| Reported metrics: |
| - **Partial Completion** — mean root-node score across tasks. |
| - **Success Rate** — fraction of tasks scoring 1.0. |
| - **Complex-A** — mean leaf score over action nodes. |
| - **Complex-P** — mean leaf score over perception nodes. |
|
|
| See `src/evaluate/` in the [code repo](https://github.com/WarriorXu0302/CAP-Bench) for the full evaluator and CLI (`run_eval.py`). |
|
|
| ## How to submit to the leaderboard |
|
|
| 1. Run your agent on all 192 public tasks (use the `instruction` field as the user prompt). |
| 2. Save each agent answer as `answers/<your_agent>/<task_id>/answer_<n>.md`. |
| 3. Run `python run_eval.py --agent_name <your_agent>` from the [code repo](https://github.com/WarriorXu0302/CAP-Bench), or report self-computed metrics if you have your own evaluator. |
| 4. [Open a leaderboard issue](https://github.com/WarriorXu0302/CAP-Bench/issues/new?labels=leaderboard&title=%5BLeaderboard%5D+) with your numbers, agent description, and a link to evaluation logs. |
|
|
| ## License |
|
|
| The dataset is released under [Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The accompanying code (CAP-Eval, construction pipeline) is released under Apache 2.0. |
|
|
| ## Citation |
|
|
| If CAP-Bench helps your work, please cite: |
|
|
| ```bibtex |
| @misc{cap2026, |
| title = {CAP: A Scalable Benchmark for Evaluating Cross-Site Browser Agents |
| with Complex Actions and Perception}, |
| author = {Xu, Zejun and Chen, Taiyi and Li, Jin and Gu, Yongtong and Cheng, Qi |
| and Lv, Aixuan and Zhu, Shuai and Zhu, Pengfei and Yang, Kaichen |
| and Sun, Boyu and Yang, Yixian and Xie, Mulong and Liu, Xin |
| and Li, Dagang and Ma, Xiaoteng and Wang, Hongru}, |
| year = {2026}, |
| note = {Preprint, arXiv link forthcoming} |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ## Acknowledgements |
|
|
| The CAP-Eval framework extends [Mind2Web2](https://github.com/OSU-NLP-Group/Mind2Web2) (Gou et al., 2025), originally released under the MIT License. See the GitHub repo's `NOTICE` file for details. |
|
|