blob_id stringlengths 40 40 | directory_id stringlengths 40 40 | path stringlengths 7 139 | content_id stringlengths 40 40 | detected_licenses sequencelengths 0 16 | license_type stringclasses 2 values | repo_name stringlengths 7 55 | snapshot_id stringlengths 40 40 | revision_id stringlengths 40 40 | branch_name stringclasses 6 values | visit_date int64 1,471B 1,694B | revision_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | committer_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | github_id float64 1.33M 604M ⌀ | star_events_count int64 0 43.5k | fork_events_count int64 0 1.5k | gha_license_id stringclasses 6 values | gha_event_created_at int64 1,402B 1,695B ⌀ | gha_created_at int64 1,359B 1,637B ⌀ | gha_language stringclasses 19 values | src_encoding stringclasses 2 values | language stringclasses 1 value | is_vendor bool 1 class | is_generated bool 1 class | length_bytes int64 3 6.4M | extension stringclasses 4 values | content stringlengths 3 6.12M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
256741b442524fa1904d7f954f22a9152b7b0f5e | 69d4931b605e11ca61881fc4f66db50a0a875e39 | /src/algebra/module/basic.lean | 420af75d6a8f2f3f32a6195eb9cdb0b006af2758 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | abentkamp/mathlib | d9a75d291ec09f4637b0f30cc3880ffb07549ee5 | 5360e476391508e092b5a1e5210bd0ed22dc0755 | refs/heads/master | 1,682,382,954,948 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 1,622,106,077,000 | 149,285,665 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 19,538 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Nathaniel Thomas. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Nathaniel Thomas, Jeremy Avigad, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import algebra.big_operators.basic
import algebra.group.hom
import group_theory.group_action.group
import algebra.smul_with_zero
/-!
# Modules over a ring
In this file we define
* `module R M` : an additive commutative monoid `M` is a `module` over a
`semiring R` if for `r : R` and `x : M` their "scalar multiplication `r • x : M` is defined, and
the operation `•` satisfies some natural associativity and distributivity axioms similar to those
on a ring.
## Implementation notes
In typical mathematical usage, our definition of `module` corresponds to "semimodule", and the
word "module" is reserved for `module R M` where `R` is a `ring` and `M` an `add_comm_group`.
If `R` is a `field` and `M` an `add_comm_group`, `M` would be called an `R`-vector space.
Since those assumptions can be made by changing the typeclasses applied to `R` and `M`,
without changing the axioms in `module`, mathlib calls everything a `module`.
In older versions of mathlib, we had separate `semimodule` and `vector_space` abbreviations.
This caused inference issues in some cases, while not providing any real advantages, so we decided
to use a canonical `module` typeclass throughout.
## Tags
semimodule, module, vector space
-/
open function
open_locale big_operators
universes u u' v w x y z
variables {R : Type u} {k : Type u'} {S : Type v} {M : Type w} {M₂ : Type x} {M₃ : Type y}
{ι : Type z}
/-- A module is a generalization of vector spaces to a scalar semiring.
It consists of a scalar semiring `R` and an additive monoid of "vectors" `M`,
connected by a "scalar multiplication" operation `r • x : M`
(where `r : R` and `x : M`) with some natural associativity and
distributivity axioms similar to those on a ring. -/
@[protect_proj] class module (R : Type u) (M : Type v) [semiring R]
[add_comm_monoid M] extends distrib_mul_action R M :=
(add_smul : ∀(r s : R) (x : M), (r + s) • x = r • x + s • x)
(zero_smul : ∀x : M, (0 : R) • x = 0)
section add_comm_monoid
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M] (r s : R) (x y : M)
/-- A module over a semiring automatically inherits a `mul_action_with_zero` structure. -/
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance module.to_mul_action_with_zero :
mul_action_with_zero R M :=
{ smul_zero := smul_zero,
zero_smul := module.zero_smul,
..(infer_instance : mul_action R M) }
instance add_comm_monoid.nat_module : module ℕ M :=
{ one_smul := one_nsmul,
mul_smul := λ m n a, mul_nsmul a m n,
smul_add := λ n a b, nsmul_add a b n,
smul_zero := nsmul_zero,
zero_smul := zero_nsmul,
add_smul := λ r s x, add_nsmul x r s }
theorem add_smul : (r + s) • x = r • x + s • x := module.add_smul r s x
variables (R)
theorem two_smul : (2 : R) • x = x + x := by rw [bit0, add_smul, one_smul]
theorem two_smul' : (2 : R) • x = bit0 x := two_smul R x
/-- Pullback a `module` structure along an injective additive monoid homomorphism. -/
protected def function.injective.module [add_comm_monoid M₂] [has_scalar R M₂] (f : M₂ →+ M)
(hf : injective f) (smul : ∀ (c : R) x, f (c • x) = c • f x) :
module R M₂ :=
{ smul := (•),
add_smul := λ c₁ c₂ x, hf $ by simp only [smul, f.map_add, add_smul],
zero_smul := λ x, hf $ by simp only [smul, zero_smul, f.map_zero],
.. hf.distrib_mul_action f smul }
/-- Pushforward a `module` structure along a surjective additive monoid homomorphism. -/
protected def function.surjective.module [add_comm_monoid M₂] [has_scalar R M₂] (f : M →+ M₂)
(hf : surjective f) (smul : ∀ (c : R) x, f (c • x) = c • f x) :
module R M₂ :=
{ smul := (•),
add_smul := λ c₁ c₂ x, by { rcases hf x with ⟨x, rfl⟩,
simp only [add_smul, ← smul, ← f.map_add] },
zero_smul := λ x, by { rcases hf x with ⟨x, rfl⟩, simp only [← f.map_zero, ← smul, zero_smul] },
.. hf.distrib_mul_action f smul }
variables {R} (M)
/-- Compose a `module` with a `ring_hom`, with action `f s • m` -/
def module.comp_hom [semiring S] (f : S →+* R) :
module S M :=
{ smul := (•) ∘ f,
add_smul := λ r s x, by simp [add_smul],
.. mul_action_with_zero.comp_hom M f.to_monoid_with_zero_hom,
.. distrib_mul_action.comp_hom M (f : S →* R) }
variables (R) (M)
/-- `(•)` as an `add_monoid_hom`. -/
def smul_add_hom : R →+ M →+ M :=
{ to_fun := const_smul_hom M,
map_zero' := add_monoid_hom.ext $ λ r, by simp,
map_add' := λ x y, add_monoid_hom.ext $ λ r, by simp [add_smul] }
variables {R M}
@[simp] lemma smul_add_hom_apply (r : R) (x : M) :
smul_add_hom R M r x = r • x := rfl
@[simp] lemma smul_add_hom_one {R M : Type*} [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M] :
smul_add_hom R M 1 = add_monoid_hom.id _ :=
const_smul_hom_one
lemma module.eq_zero_of_zero_eq_one (zero_eq_one : (0 : R) = 1) : x = 0 :=
by rw [←one_smul R x, ←zero_eq_one, zero_smul]
lemma list.sum_smul {l : list R} {x : M} : l.sum • x = (l.map (λ r, r • x)).sum :=
((smul_add_hom R M).flip x).map_list_sum l
lemma multiset.sum_smul {l : multiset R} {x : M} : l.sum • x = (l.map (λ r, r • x)).sum :=
((smul_add_hom R M).flip x).map_multiset_sum l
lemma finset.sum_smul {f : ι → R} {s : finset ι} {x : M} :
(∑ i in s, f i) • x = (∑ i in s, (f i) • x) :=
((smul_add_hom R M).flip x).map_sum f s
end add_comm_monoid
variables (R)
/-- An `add_comm_monoid` that is a `module` over a `ring` carries a natural `add_comm_group`
structure. -/
def module.add_comm_monoid_to_add_comm_group [ring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M] :
add_comm_group M :=
{ neg := λ a, (-1 : R) • a,
add_left_neg := λ a, show (-1 : R) • a + a = 0, by {
nth_rewrite 1 ← one_smul _ a,
rw [← add_smul, add_left_neg, zero_smul] },
..(infer_instance : add_comm_monoid M), }
variables {R}
section add_comm_group
variables (R M) [semiring R] [add_comm_group M]
instance add_comm_group.int_module : module ℤ M :=
{ one_smul := one_gsmul,
mul_smul := λ m n a, mul_gsmul a m n,
smul_add := λ n a b, gsmul_add a b n,
smul_zero := gsmul_zero,
zero_smul := zero_gsmul,
add_smul := λ r s x, add_gsmul x r s }
/-- A structure containing most informations as in a module, except the fields `zero_smul`
and `smul_zero`. As these fields can be deduced from the other ones when `M` is an `add_comm_group`,
this provides a way to construct a module structure by checking less properties, in
`module.of_core`. -/
@[nolint has_inhabited_instance]
structure module.core extends has_scalar R M :=
(smul_add : ∀(r : R) (x y : M), r • (x + y) = r • x + r • y)
(add_smul : ∀(r s : R) (x : M), (r + s) • x = r • x + s • x)
(mul_smul : ∀(r s : R) (x : M), (r * s) • x = r • s • x)
(one_smul : ∀x : M, (1 : R) • x = x)
variables {R M}
/-- Define `module` without proving `zero_smul` and `smul_zero` by using an auxiliary
structure `module.core`, when the underlying space is an `add_comm_group`. -/
def module.of_core (H : module.core R M) : module R M :=
by letI := H.to_has_scalar; exact
{ zero_smul := λ x, (add_monoid_hom.mk' (λ r : R, r • x) (λ r s, H.add_smul r s x)).map_zero,
smul_zero := λ r, (add_monoid_hom.mk' ((•) r) (H.smul_add r)).map_zero,
..H }
end add_comm_group
/--
To prove two module structures on a fixed `add_comm_monoid` agree,
it suffices to check the scalar multiplications agree.
-/
-- We'll later use this to show `module ℕ M` and `module ℤ M` are subsingletons.
@[ext]
lemma module_ext {R : Type*} [semiring R] {M : Type*} [add_comm_monoid M] (P Q : module R M)
(w : ∀ (r : R) (m : M), by { haveI := P, exact r • m } = by { haveI := Q, exact r • m }) :
P = Q :=
begin
unfreezingI { rcases P with ⟨⟨⟨⟨P⟩⟩⟩⟩, rcases Q with ⟨⟨⟨⟨Q⟩⟩⟩⟩ },
congr,
funext r m,
exact w r m,
all_goals { apply proof_irrel_heq },
end
section module
variables [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M] (r s : R) (x y : M)
@[simp] theorem neg_smul : -r • x = - (r • x) :=
eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero (by rw [← add_smul, add_left_neg, zero_smul])
@[simp] theorem units.neg_smul (u : units R) (x : M) : -u • x = - (u • x) :=
by rw [units.smul_def, units.coe_neg, neg_smul, units.smul_def]
variables (R)
theorem neg_one_smul (x : M) : (-1 : R) • x = -x := by simp
variables {R}
theorem sub_smul (r s : R) (y : M) : (r - s) • y = r • y - s • y :=
by simp [add_smul, sub_eq_add_neg]
end module
/-- A module over a `subsingleton` semiring is a `subsingleton`. We cannot register this
as an instance because Lean has no way to guess `R`. -/
protected
theorem module.subsingleton (R M : Type*) [semiring R] [subsingleton R] [add_comm_monoid M]
[module R M] :
subsingleton M :=
⟨λ x y, by rw [← one_smul R x, ← one_smul R y, subsingleton.elim (1:R) 0, zero_smul, zero_smul]⟩
@[priority 910] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semiring.to_module [semiring R] : module R R :=
{ smul_add := mul_add,
add_smul := add_mul,
zero_smul := zero_mul,
smul_zero := mul_zero }
/-- A ring homomorphism `f : R →+* M` defines a module structure by `r • x = f r * x`. -/
def ring_hom.to_module [semiring R] [semiring S] (f : R →+* S) : module R S :=
{ smul := λ r x, f r * x,
smul_add := λ r x y, by unfold has_scalar.smul; rw [mul_add],
add_smul := λ r s x, by unfold has_scalar.smul; rw [f.map_add, add_mul],
mul_smul := λ r s x, by unfold has_scalar.smul; rw [f.map_mul, mul_assoc],
one_smul := λ x, show f 1 * x = _, by rw [f.map_one, one_mul],
zero_smul := λ x, show f 0 * x = 0, by rw [f.map_zero, zero_mul],
smul_zero := λ r, mul_zero (f r) }
section add_comm_monoid
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M]
section
variables (R)
/-- `nsmul` is equal to any other module structure via a cast. -/
lemma nsmul_eq_smul_cast (n : ℕ) (b : M) :
n • b = (n : R) • b :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ rw [nat.cast_zero, zero_smul, zero_smul] },
{ rw [nat.succ_eq_add_one, nat.cast_succ, add_smul, add_smul, one_smul, ih, one_smul], }
end
end
/-- Convert back any exotic `ℕ`-smul to the canonical instance. This should not be needed since in
mathlib all `add_comm_monoid`s should normally have exactly one `ℕ`-module structure by design.
-/
lemma nat_smul_eq_nsmul (h : module ℕ M) (n : ℕ) (x : M) :
@has_scalar.smul ℕ M h.to_has_scalar n x = n • x :=
by rw [nsmul_eq_smul_cast ℕ n x, nat.cast_id]
/-- All `ℕ`-module structures are equal. Not an instance since in mathlib all `add_comm_monoid`
should normally have exactly one `ℕ`-module structure by design. -/
def add_comm_monoid.nat_module.unique : unique (module ℕ M) :=
{ default := by apply_instance,
uniq := λ P, module_ext P _ $ λ n, nat_smul_eq_nsmul P n }
instance add_comm_monoid.nat_is_scalar_tower :
is_scalar_tower ℕ R M :=
{ smul_assoc := λ n x y, nat.rec_on n
(by simp only [zero_smul])
(λ n ih, by simp only [nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_smul, one_smul, ih]) }
instance add_comm_monoid.nat_smul_comm_class : smul_comm_class ℕ R M :=
{ smul_comm := λ n r m, nat.rec_on n
(by simp only [zero_smul, smul_zero])
(λ n ih, by simp only [nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_smul, one_smul, ←ih, smul_add]) }
-- `smul_comm_class.symm` is not registered as an instance, as it would cause a loop
instance add_comm_monoid.nat_smul_comm_class' : smul_comm_class R ℕ M :=
smul_comm_class.symm _ _ _
end add_comm_monoid
section add_comm_group
variables [semiring S] [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module S M] [module R M]
section
variables (R)
/-- `gsmul` is equal to any other module structure via a cast. -/
lemma gsmul_eq_smul_cast (n : ℤ) (b : M) : n • b = (n : R) • b :=
begin
induction n using int.induction_on with p hp n hn,
{ rw [int.cast_zero, zero_smul, zero_smul] },
{ rw [int.cast_add, int.cast_one, add_smul, add_smul, one_smul, one_smul, hp] },
{ rw [int.cast_sub, int.cast_one, sub_smul, sub_smul, one_smul, one_smul, hn] },
end
end
/-- Convert back any exotic `ℤ`-smul to the canonical instance. This should not be needed since in
mathlib all `add_comm_group`s should normally have exactly one `ℤ`-module structure by design. -/
lemma int_smul_eq_gsmul (h : module ℤ M) (n : ℤ) (x : M) :
@has_scalar.smul ℤ M h.to_has_scalar n x = n • x :=
by rw [gsmul_eq_smul_cast ℤ n x, int.cast_id]
/-- All `ℤ`-module structures are equal. Not an instance since in mathlib all `add_comm_group`
should normally have exactly one `ℤ`-module structure by design. -/
def add_comm_group.int_module.unique : unique (module ℤ M) :=
{ default := by apply_instance,
uniq := λ P, module_ext P _ $ λ n, int_smul_eq_gsmul P n }
instance add_comm_group.int_is_scalar_tower : is_scalar_tower ℤ R M :=
{ smul_assoc := λ n x y, int.induction_on n
(by simp only [zero_smul])
(λ n ih, by simp only [one_smul, add_smul, ih])
(λ n ih, by simp only [one_smul, sub_smul, ih]) }
instance add_comm_group.int_smul_comm_class : smul_comm_class ℤ S M :=
{ smul_comm := λ n x y, int.induction_on n
(by simp only [zero_smul, smul_zero])
(λ n ih, by simp only [one_smul, add_smul, smul_add, ih])
(λ n ih, by simp only [one_smul, sub_smul, smul_sub, ih]) }
-- `smul_comm_class.symm` is not registered as an instance, as it would cause a loop
instance add_comm_group.int_smul_comm_class' : smul_comm_class S ℤ M :=
smul_comm_class.symm _ _ _
end add_comm_group
namespace add_monoid_hom
lemma map_nat_module_smul [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂]
(f : M →+ M₂) (x : ℕ) (a : M) : f (x • a) = x • f a :=
by simp only [f.map_nsmul]
lemma map_int_module_smul [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂]
(f : M →+ M₂) (x : ℤ) (a : M) : f (x • a) = x • f a :=
by simp only [f.map_gsmul]
lemma map_int_cast_smul
[ring R] [add_comm_group M] [add_comm_group M₂] [module R M] [module R M₂]
(f : M →+ M₂) (x : ℤ) (a : M) : f ((x : R) • a) = (x : R) • f a :=
by simp only [←gsmul_eq_smul_cast, f.map_gsmul]
lemma map_nat_cast_smul
[semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [add_comm_monoid M₂]
[module R M] [module R M₂] (f : M →+ M₂) (x : ℕ) (a : M) :
f ((x : R) • a) = (x : R) • f a :=
by simp only [←nsmul_eq_smul_cast, f.map_nsmul]
lemma map_rat_cast_smul {R : Type*} [division_ring R] [char_zero R]
{E : Type*} [add_comm_group E] [module R E] {F : Type*} [add_comm_group F] [module R F]
(f : E →+ F) (c : ℚ) (x : E) :
f ((c : R) • x) = (c : R) • f x :=
begin
have : ∀ (x : E) (n : ℕ), 0 < n → f (((n⁻¹ : ℚ) : R) • x) = ((n⁻¹ : ℚ) : R) • f x,
{ intros x n hn,
replace hn : (n : R) ≠ 0 := nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (ne_of_gt hn),
conv_rhs { congr, skip, rw [← one_smul R x, ← mul_inv_cancel hn, mul_smul] },
rw [f.map_nat_cast_smul, smul_smul, rat.cast_inv, rat.cast_coe_nat,
inv_mul_cancel hn, one_smul] },
refine c.num_denom_cases_on (λ m n hn hmn, _),
rw [rat.mk_eq_div, div_eq_mul_inv, rat.cast_mul, int.cast_coe_nat, mul_smul, mul_smul,
rat.cast_coe_int, f.map_int_cast_smul, this _ n hn]
end
lemma map_rat_module_smul {E : Type*} [add_comm_group E] [module ℚ E]
{F : Type*} [add_comm_group F] [module ℚ F] (f : E →+ F) (c : ℚ) (x : E) :
f (c • x) = c • f x :=
rat.cast_id c ▸ f.map_rat_cast_smul c x
end add_monoid_hom
section no_zero_smul_divisors
/-! ### `no_zero_smul_divisors`
This section defines the `no_zero_smul_divisors` class, and includes some tests
for the vanishing of elements (especially in modules over division rings).
-/
/-- `no_zero_smul_divisors R M` states that a scalar multiple is `0` only if either argument is `0`.
This a version of saying that `M` is torsion free, without assuming `R` is zero-divisor free.
The main application of `no_zero_smul_divisors R M`, when `M` is a module,
is the result `smul_eq_zero`: a scalar multiple is `0` iff either argument is `0`.
It is a generalization of the `no_zero_divisors` class to heterogeneous multiplication.
-/
class no_zero_smul_divisors (R M : Type*) [has_zero R] [has_zero M] [has_scalar R M] : Prop :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero : ∀ {c : R} {x : M}, c • x = 0 → c = 0 ∨ x = 0)
export no_zero_smul_divisors (eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero)
section module
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_monoid M] [module R M]
instance no_zero_smul_divisors.of_no_zero_divisors [no_zero_divisors R] :
no_zero_smul_divisors R R :=
⟨λ c x, no_zero_divisors.eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_eq_zero [no_zero_smul_divisors R M] {c : R} {x : M} :
c • x = 0 ↔ c = 0 ∨ x = 0 :=
⟨eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero,
λ h, h.elim (λ h, h.symm ▸ zero_smul R x) (λ h, h.symm ▸ smul_zero c)⟩
theorem smul_ne_zero [no_zero_smul_divisors R M] {c : R} {x : M} :
c • x ≠ 0 ↔ c ≠ 0 ∧ x ≠ 0 :=
by simp only [ne.def, smul_eq_zero, not_or_distrib]
section nat
variables (R) (M) [no_zero_smul_divisors R M] [char_zero R]
include R
lemma nat.no_zero_smul_divisors : no_zero_smul_divisors ℕ M :=
⟨by { intros c x, rw [nsmul_eq_smul_cast R, smul_eq_zero], simp }⟩
variables {M}
lemma eq_zero_of_smul_two_eq_zero {v : M} (hv : 2 • v = 0) : v = 0 :=
by haveI := nat.no_zero_smul_divisors R M;
exact (smul_eq_zero.mp hv).resolve_left (by norm_num)
end nat
end module
section add_comm_group -- `R` can still be a semiring here
variables [semiring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
section smul_injective
variables (M)
lemma smul_left_injective [no_zero_smul_divisors R M] {c : R} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
function.injective (λ (x : M), c • x) :=
λ x y h, sub_eq_zero.mp ((smul_eq_zero.mp
(calc c • (x - y) = c • x - c • y : smul_sub c x y
... = 0 : sub_eq_zero.mpr h)).resolve_left hc)
end smul_injective
section nat
variables (R) [no_zero_smul_divisors R M] [char_zero R]
include R
lemma eq_zero_of_eq_neg {v : M} (hv : v = - v) : v = 0 :=
begin
haveI := nat.no_zero_smul_divisors R M,
refine eq_zero_of_smul_two_eq_zero R _,
rw two_smul,
exact add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg.mpr hv
end
end nat
end add_comm_group
section module
variables [ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M] [no_zero_smul_divisors R M]
section smul_injective
variables (R)
lemma smul_right_injective {x : M} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
function.injective (λ (c : R), c • x) :=
λ c d h, sub_eq_zero.mp ((smul_eq_zero.mp
(calc (c - d) • x = c • x - d • x : sub_smul c d x
... = 0 : sub_eq_zero.mpr h)).resolve_right hx)
end smul_injective
section nat
variables [char_zero R]
lemma ne_neg_of_ne_zero [no_zero_divisors R] {v : R} (hv : v ≠ 0) : v ≠ -v :=
λ h, hv (eq_zero_of_eq_neg R h)
end nat
end module
section division_ring
variables [division_ring R] [add_comm_group M] [module R M]
@[priority 100] -- see note [lower instance priority]
instance no_zero_smul_divisors.of_division_ring : no_zero_smul_divisors R M :=
⟨λ c x h, or_iff_not_imp_left.2 $ λ hc, (smul_eq_zero_iff_eq' hc).1 h⟩
end division_ring
end no_zero_smul_divisors
@[simp] lemma nat.smul_one_eq_coe {R : Type*} [semiring R] (m : ℕ) :
m • (1 : R) = ↑m :=
by rw [nsmul_eq_mul, mul_one]
@[simp] lemma int.smul_one_eq_coe {R : Type*} [ring R] (m : ℤ) :
m • (1 : R) = ↑m :=
by rw [gsmul_eq_mul, mul_one]
|
ea8390c7adb9ca681bac341ad61a57137814039f | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /tests/lean/interactive/complete.lean | a45eedff1966a409fbdb55fe19597867b48fb5bf | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 498 | lean | prelude
inductive foo
example := foo
--^ "command": "complete"
-- should not complete empty declaration completion
example := foo
--^ "command": "complete"
@[reducible]
--^ "command": "complete", "skip_completions": true
example := foo
set_option trace.simplify true
--^ "command": "complete", "skip_completions": true
#print foo
--^ "command": "complete", "skip_completions": true
section foo
end foo
--^ "command": "complete", "skip_completions": true
|
06c2a3b5aaebbfaca2488e20acbf64141f76e792 | 4d2583807a5ac6caaffd3d7a5f646d61ca85d532 | /src/topology/basic.lean | 5273b659085013740ae19dec70b6a9624a3c0788 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AntoineChambert-Loir/mathlib | 64aabb896129885f12296a799818061bc90da1ff | 07be904260ab6e36a5769680b6012f03a4727134 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,187,631,771 | 1,636,719,886,000 | 1,636,719,886,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 68,830 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import order.filter.ultrafilter
import order.filter.partial
import algebra.support
/-!
# Basic theory of topological spaces.
The main definition is the type class `topological space α` which endows a type `α` with a topology.
Then `set α` gets predicates `is_open`, `is_closed` and functions `interior`, `closure` and
`frontier`. Each point `x` of `α` gets a neighborhood filter `𝓝 x`. A filter `F` on `α` has
`x` as a cluster point if `cluster_pt x F : 𝓝 x ⊓ F ≠ ⊥`. A map `f : ι → α` clusters at `x`
along `F : filter ι` if `map_cluster_pt x F f : cluster_pt x (map f F)`. In particular
the notion of cluster point of a sequence `u` is `map_cluster_pt x at_top u`.
This file also defines locally finite families of subsets of `α`.
For topological spaces `α` and `β`, a function `f : α → β` and a point `a : α`,
`continuous_at f a` means `f` is continuous at `a`, and global continuity is
`continuous f`. There is also a version of continuity `pcontinuous` for
partially defined functions.
## Notation
* `𝓝 x`: the filter of neighborhoods of a point `x`;
* `𝓟 s`: the principal filter of a set `s`;
* `𝓝[s] x`: the filter `nhds_within x s` of neighborhoods of a point `x` within a set `s`.
## Implementation notes
Topology in mathlib heavily uses filters (even more than in Bourbaki). See explanations in
<https://leanprover-community.github.io/theories/topology.html>.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
## Tags
topological space, interior, closure, frontier, neighborhood, continuity, continuous function
-/
noncomputable theory
open set filter classical
open_locale classical filter
universes u v w
/-!
### Topological spaces
-/
/-- A topology on `α`. -/
@[protect_proj] structure topological_space (α : Type u) :=
(is_open : set α → Prop)
(is_open_univ : is_open univ)
(is_open_inter : ∀s t, is_open s → is_open t → is_open (s ∩ t))
(is_open_sUnion : ∀s, (∀t∈s, is_open t) → is_open (⋃₀ s))
attribute [class] topological_space
/-- A constructor for topologies by specifying the closed sets,
and showing that they satisfy the appropriate conditions. -/
def topological_space.of_closed {α : Type u} (T : set (set α))
(empty_mem : ∅ ∈ T) (sInter_mem : ∀ A ⊆ T, ⋂₀ A ∈ T) (union_mem : ∀ A B ∈ T, A ∪ B ∈ T) :
topological_space α :=
{ is_open := λ X, Xᶜ ∈ T,
is_open_univ := by simp [empty_mem],
is_open_inter := λ s t hs ht, by simpa [set.compl_inter] using union_mem sᶜ tᶜ hs ht,
is_open_sUnion := λ s hs,
by rw set.compl_sUnion; exact sInter_mem (set.compl '' s)
(λ z ⟨y, hy, hz⟩, by simpa [hz.symm] using hs y hy) }
section topological_space
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {a : α} {s s₁ s₂ : set α} {p p₁ p₂ : α → Prop}
@[ext]
lemma topological_space_eq : ∀ {f g : topological_space α}, f.is_open = g.is_open → f = g
| ⟨a, _, _, _⟩ ⟨b, _, _, _⟩ rfl := rfl
section
variables [t : topological_space α]
include t
/-- `is_open s` means that `s` is open in the ambient topological space on `α` -/
def is_open (s : set α) : Prop := topological_space.is_open t s
@[simp]
lemma is_open_univ : is_open (univ : set α) := topological_space.is_open_univ t
lemma is_open.inter (h₁ : is_open s₁) (h₂ : is_open s₂) : is_open (s₁ ∩ s₂) :=
topological_space.is_open_inter t s₁ s₂ h₁ h₂
lemma is_open_sUnion {s : set (set α)} (h : ∀t ∈ s, is_open t) : is_open (⋃₀ s) :=
topological_space.is_open_sUnion t s h
end
lemma topological_space_eq_iff {t t' : topological_space α} :
t = t' ↔ ∀ s, @is_open α t s ↔ @is_open α t' s :=
⟨λ h s, h ▸ iff.rfl, λ h, by { ext, exact h _ }⟩
lemma is_open_fold {s : set α} {t : topological_space α} : t.is_open s = @is_open α t s :=
rfl
variables [topological_space α]
lemma is_open_Union {f : ι → set α} (h : ∀i, is_open (f i)) : is_open (⋃i, f i) :=
is_open_sUnion $ by rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩; exact h i
lemma is_open_bUnion {s : set β} {f : β → set α} (h : ∀i∈s, is_open (f i)) :
is_open (⋃i∈s, f i) :=
is_open_Union $ assume i, is_open_Union $ assume hi, h i hi
lemma is_open.union (h₁ : is_open s₁) (h₂ : is_open s₂) : is_open (s₁ ∪ s₂) :=
by rw union_eq_Union; exact is_open_Union (bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩)
@[simp] lemma is_open_empty : is_open (∅ : set α) :=
by rw ← sUnion_empty; exact is_open_sUnion (assume a, false.elim)
lemma is_open_sInter {s : set (set α)} (hs : finite s) : (∀t ∈ s, is_open t) → is_open (⋂₀ s) :=
finite.induction_on hs (λ _, by rw sInter_empty; exact is_open_univ) $
λ a s has hs ih h, by rw sInter_insert; exact
is_open.inter (h _ $ mem_insert _ _) (ih $ λ t, h t ∘ mem_insert_of_mem _)
lemma is_open_bInter {s : set β} {f : β → set α} (hs : finite s) :
(∀i∈s, is_open (f i)) → is_open (⋂i∈s, f i) :=
finite.induction_on hs
(λ _, by rw bInter_empty; exact is_open_univ)
(λ a s has hs ih h, by rw bInter_insert; exact
is_open.inter (h a (mem_insert _ _)) (ih (λ i hi, h i (mem_insert_of_mem _ hi))))
lemma is_open_Inter [fintype β] {s : β → set α}
(h : ∀ i, is_open (s i)) : is_open (⋂ i, s i) :=
suffices is_open (⋂ (i : β) (hi : i ∈ @univ β), s i), by simpa,
is_open_bInter finite_univ (λ i _, h i)
lemma is_open_Inter_prop {p : Prop} {s : p → set α}
(h : ∀ h : p, is_open (s h)) : is_open (Inter s) :=
by by_cases p; simp *
lemma is_open_const {p : Prop} : is_open {a : α | p} :=
by_cases
(assume : p, begin simp only [this]; exact is_open_univ end)
(assume : ¬ p, begin simp only [this]; exact is_open_empty end)
lemma is_open.and : is_open {a | p₁ a} → is_open {a | p₂ a} → is_open {a | p₁ a ∧ p₂ a} :=
is_open.inter
/-- A set is closed if its complement is open -/
class is_closed (s : set α) : Prop :=
(is_open_compl : is_open sᶜ)
@[simp] lemma is_open_compl_iff {s : set α} : is_open sᶜ ↔ is_closed s :=
⟨λ h, ⟨h⟩, λ h, h.is_open_compl⟩
@[simp] lemma is_closed_empty : is_closed (∅ : set α) :=
by { rw [← is_open_compl_iff, compl_empty], exact is_open_univ }
@[simp] lemma is_closed_univ : is_closed (univ : set α) :=
by { rw [← is_open_compl_iff, compl_univ], exact is_open_empty }
lemma is_closed.union : is_closed s₁ → is_closed s₂ → is_closed (s₁ ∪ s₂) :=
λ h₁ h₂, by { rw [← is_open_compl_iff] at *, rw compl_union, exact is_open.inter h₁ h₂ }
lemma is_closed_sInter {s : set (set α)} : (∀t ∈ s, is_closed t) → is_closed (⋂₀ s) :=
by simpa only [← is_open_compl_iff, compl_sInter, sUnion_image] using is_open_bUnion
lemma is_closed_Inter {f : ι → set α} (h : ∀i, is_closed (f i)) : is_closed (⋂i, f i ) :=
is_closed_sInter $ assume t ⟨i, (heq : f i = t)⟩, heq ▸ h i
lemma is_closed_bInter {s : set β} {f : β → set α} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, is_closed (f i)) :
is_closed (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
is_closed_Inter $ λ i, is_closed_Inter $ h i
@[simp] lemma is_closed_compl_iff {s : set α} : is_closed sᶜ ↔ is_open s :=
by rw [←is_open_compl_iff, compl_compl]
lemma is_open.is_closed_compl {s : set α} (hs : is_open s) : is_closed sᶜ :=
is_closed_compl_iff.2 hs
lemma is_open.sdiff {s t : set α} (h₁ : is_open s) (h₂ : is_closed t) : is_open (s \ t) :=
is_open.inter h₁ $ is_open_compl_iff.mpr h₂
lemma is_closed.inter (h₁ : is_closed s₁) (h₂ : is_closed s₂) : is_closed (s₁ ∩ s₂) :=
by { rw [← is_open_compl_iff] at *, rw compl_inter, exact is_open.union h₁ h₂ }
lemma is_closed.sdiff {s t : set α} (h₁ : is_closed s) (h₂ : is_open t) : is_closed (s \ t) :=
is_closed.inter h₁ (is_closed_compl_iff.mpr h₂)
lemma is_closed_bUnion {s : set β} {f : β → set α} (hs : finite s) :
(∀i∈s, is_closed (f i)) → is_closed (⋃i∈s, f i) :=
finite.induction_on hs
(λ _, by rw bUnion_empty; exact is_closed_empty)
(λ a s has hs ih h, by rw bUnion_insert; exact
is_closed.union (h a (mem_insert _ _)) (ih (λ i hi, h i (mem_insert_of_mem _ hi))))
lemma is_closed_Union [fintype β] {s : β → set α}
(h : ∀ i, is_closed (s i)) : is_closed (Union s) :=
suffices is_closed (⋃ (i : β) (hi : i ∈ @univ β), s i),
by convert this; simp [set.ext_iff],
is_closed_bUnion finite_univ (λ i _, h i)
lemma is_closed_Union_prop {p : Prop} {s : p → set α}
(h : ∀ h : p, is_closed (s h)) : is_closed (Union s) :=
by by_cases p; simp *
lemma is_closed_imp {p q : α → Prop} (hp : is_open {x | p x})
(hq : is_closed {x | q x}) : is_closed {x | p x → q x} :=
have {x | p x → q x} = {x | p x}ᶜ ∪ {x | q x}, from set.ext $ λ x, imp_iff_not_or,
by rw [this]; exact is_closed.union (is_closed_compl_iff.mpr hp) hq
lemma is_closed.not : is_closed {a | p a} → is_open {a | ¬ p a} :=
is_open_compl_iff.mpr
/-!
### Interior of a set
-/
/-- The interior of a set `s` is the largest open subset of `s`. -/
def interior (s : set α) : set α := ⋃₀ {t | is_open t ∧ t ⊆ s}
lemma mem_interior {s : set α} {x : α} :
x ∈ interior s ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, is_open t ∧ x ∈ t :=
by simp only [interior, mem_set_of_eq, exists_prop, and_assoc, and.left_comm]
@[simp] lemma is_open_interior {s : set α} : is_open (interior s) :=
is_open_sUnion $ assume t ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₁
lemma interior_subset {s : set α} : interior s ⊆ s :=
sUnion_subset $ assume t ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₂
lemma interior_maximal {s t : set α} (h₁ : t ⊆ s) (h₂ : is_open t) : t ⊆ interior s :=
subset_sUnion_of_mem ⟨h₂, h₁⟩
lemma is_open.interior_eq {s : set α} (h : is_open s) : interior s = s :=
subset.antisymm interior_subset (interior_maximal (subset.refl s) h)
lemma interior_eq_iff_open {s : set α} : interior s = s ↔ is_open s :=
⟨assume h, h ▸ is_open_interior, is_open.interior_eq⟩
lemma subset_interior_iff_open {s : set α} : s ⊆ interior s ↔ is_open s :=
by simp only [interior_eq_iff_open.symm, subset.antisymm_iff, interior_subset, true_and]
lemma subset_interior_iff_subset_of_open {s t : set α} (h₁ : is_open s) :
s ⊆ interior t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨assume h, subset.trans h interior_subset, assume h₂, interior_maximal h₂ h₁⟩
@[mono] lemma interior_mono {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : interior s ⊆ interior t :=
interior_maximal (subset.trans interior_subset h) is_open_interior
@[simp] lemma interior_empty : interior (∅ : set α) = ∅ :=
is_open_empty.interior_eq
@[simp] lemma interior_univ : interior (univ : set α) = univ :=
is_open_univ.interior_eq
@[simp] lemma interior_interior {s : set α} : interior (interior s) = interior s :=
is_open_interior.interior_eq
@[simp] lemma interior_inter {s t : set α} : interior (s ∩ t) = interior s ∩ interior t :=
subset.antisymm
(subset_inter (interior_mono $ inter_subset_left s t) (interior_mono $ inter_subset_right s t))
(interior_maximal (inter_subset_inter interior_subset interior_subset) $
is_open.inter is_open_interior is_open_interior)
@[simp] lemma finset.interior_Inter {ι : Type*} (s : finset ι) (f : ι → set α) :
interior (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) = ⋂ i ∈ s, interior (f i) :=
begin
classical,
refine s.induction_on (by simp) _,
intros i s h₁ h₂,
simp [h₂],
end
@[simp] lemma interior_Inter_of_fintype {ι : Type*} [fintype ι] (f : ι → set α) :
interior (⋂ i, f i) = ⋂ i, interior (f i) :=
by { convert finset.univ.interior_Inter f; simp, }
lemma interior_union_is_closed_of_interior_empty {s t : set α} (h₁ : is_closed s)
(h₂ : interior t = ∅) :
interior (s ∪ t) = interior s :=
have interior (s ∪ t) ⊆ s, from
assume x ⟨u, ⟨(hu₁ : is_open u), (hu₂ : u ⊆ s ∪ t)⟩, (hx₁ : x ∈ u)⟩,
classical.by_contradiction $ assume hx₂ : x ∉ s,
have u \ s ⊆ t,
from assume x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, or.resolve_left (hu₂ h₁) h₂,
have u \ s ⊆ interior t,
by rwa subset_interior_iff_subset_of_open (is_open.sdiff hu₁ h₁),
have u \ s ⊆ ∅,
by rwa h₂ at this,
this ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩,
subset.antisymm
(interior_maximal this is_open_interior)
(interior_mono $ subset_union_left _ _)
lemma is_open_iff_forall_mem_open : is_open s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ⊆ s, is_open t ∧ x ∈ t :=
by rw ← subset_interior_iff_open; simp only [subset_def, mem_interior]
lemma interior_Inter_subset (s : ι → set α) : interior (⋂ i, s i) ⊆ ⋂ i, interior (s i) :=
subset_Inter $ λ i, interior_mono $ Inter_subset _ _
lemma interior_bInter_subset (p : ι → Sort*) (s : Π i, p i → set α) :
interior (⋂ i (hi : p i), s i hi) ⊆ ⋂ i (hi : p i), interior (s i hi) :=
(interior_Inter_subset _).trans $ Inter_subset_Inter $ λ i, interior_Inter_subset _
lemma interior_sInter_subset (S : set (set α)) : interior (⋂₀ S) ⊆ ⋂ s ∈ S, interior s :=
calc interior (⋂₀ S) = interior (⋂ s ∈ S, s) : by rw sInter_eq_bInter
... ⊆ ⋂ s ∈ S, interior s : interior_bInter_subset _ _
/-!
### Closure of a set
-/
/-- The closure of `s` is the smallest closed set containing `s`. -/
def closure (s : set α) : set α := ⋂₀ {t | is_closed t ∧ s ⊆ t}
@[simp] lemma is_closed_closure {s : set α} : is_closed (closure s) :=
is_closed_sInter $ assume t ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₁
lemma subset_closure {s : set α} : s ⊆ closure s :=
subset_sInter $ assume t ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₂
lemma not_mem_of_not_mem_closure {s : set α} {P : α} (hP : P ∉ closure s) : P ∉ s :=
λ h, hP (subset_closure h)
lemma closure_minimal {s t : set α} (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : is_closed t) : closure s ⊆ t :=
sInter_subset_of_mem ⟨h₂, h₁⟩
lemma is_closed.closure_eq {s : set α} (h : is_closed s) : closure s = s :=
subset.antisymm (closure_minimal (subset.refl s) h) subset_closure
lemma is_closed.closure_subset {s : set α} (hs : is_closed s) : closure s ⊆ s :=
closure_minimal (subset.refl _) hs
lemma is_closed.closure_subset_iff {s t : set α} (h₁ : is_closed t) :
closure s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨subset.trans subset_closure, assume h, closure_minimal h h₁⟩
@[mono] lemma closure_mono {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : closure s ⊆ closure t :=
closure_minimal (subset.trans h subset_closure) is_closed_closure
lemma monotone_closure (α : Type*) [topological_space α] : monotone (@closure α _) :=
λ _ _, closure_mono
lemma diff_subset_closure_iff {s t : set α} :
s \ t ⊆ closure t ↔ s ⊆ closure t :=
by rw [diff_subset_iff, union_eq_self_of_subset_left subset_closure]
lemma closure_inter_subset_inter_closure (s t : set α) :
closure (s ∩ t) ⊆ closure s ∩ closure t :=
(monotone_closure α).map_inf_le s t
lemma is_closed_of_closure_subset {s : set α} (h : closure s ⊆ s) : is_closed s :=
by rw subset.antisymm subset_closure h; exact is_closed_closure
lemma closure_eq_iff_is_closed {s : set α} : closure s = s ↔ is_closed s :=
⟨assume h, h ▸ is_closed_closure, is_closed.closure_eq⟩
lemma closure_subset_iff_is_closed {s : set α} : closure s ⊆ s ↔ is_closed s :=
⟨is_closed_of_closure_subset, is_closed.closure_subset⟩
@[simp] lemma closure_empty : closure (∅ : set α) = ∅ :=
is_closed_empty.closure_eq
@[simp] lemma closure_empty_iff (s : set α) : closure s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
⟨subset_eq_empty subset_closure, λ h, h.symm ▸ closure_empty⟩
@[simp] lemma closure_nonempty_iff {s : set α} : (closure s).nonempty ↔ s.nonempty :=
by simp only [← ne_empty_iff_nonempty, ne.def, closure_empty_iff]
alias closure_nonempty_iff ↔ set.nonempty.of_closure set.nonempty.closure
@[simp] lemma closure_univ : closure (univ : set α) = univ :=
is_closed_univ.closure_eq
@[simp] lemma closure_closure {s : set α} : closure (closure s) = closure s :=
is_closed_closure.closure_eq
@[simp] lemma closure_union {s t : set α} : closure (s ∪ t) = closure s ∪ closure t :=
subset.antisymm
(closure_minimal (union_subset_union subset_closure subset_closure) $
is_closed.union is_closed_closure is_closed_closure)
((monotone_closure α).le_map_sup s t)
@[simp] lemma finset.closure_Union {ι : Type*} (s : finset ι) (f : ι → set α) :
closure (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) = ⋃ i ∈ s, closure (f i) :=
begin
classical,
refine s.induction_on (by simp) _,
intros i s h₁ h₂,
simp [h₂],
end
@[simp] lemma closure_Union_of_fintype {ι : Type*} [fintype ι] (f : ι → set α) :
closure (⋃ i, f i) = ⋃ i, closure (f i) :=
by { convert finset.univ.closure_Union f; simp, }
lemma interior_subset_closure {s : set α} : interior s ⊆ closure s :=
subset.trans interior_subset subset_closure
lemma closure_eq_compl_interior_compl {s : set α} : closure s = (interior sᶜ)ᶜ :=
begin
rw [interior, closure, compl_sUnion, compl_image_set_of],
simp only [compl_subset_compl, is_open_compl_iff],
end
@[simp] lemma interior_compl {s : set α} : interior sᶜ = (closure s)ᶜ :=
by simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl]
@[simp] lemma closure_compl {s : set α} : closure sᶜ = (interior s)ᶜ :=
by simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl]
theorem mem_closure_iff {s : set α} {a : α} :
a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ o, is_open o → a ∈ o → (o ∩ s).nonempty :=
⟨λ h o oo ao, classical.by_contradiction $ λ os,
have s ⊆ oᶜ, from λ x xs xo, os ⟨x, xo, xs⟩,
closure_minimal this (is_closed_compl_iff.2 oo) h ao,
λ H c ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, classical.by_contradiction $ λ nc,
let ⟨x, hc, hs⟩ := (H _ h₁.is_open_compl nc) in hc (h₂ hs)⟩
/-- A set is dense in a topological space if every point belongs to its closure. -/
def dense (s : set α) : Prop := ∀ x, x ∈ closure s
lemma dense_iff_closure_eq {s : set α} : dense s ↔ closure s = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.symm
lemma dense.closure_eq {s : set α} (h : dense s) : closure s = univ :=
dense_iff_closure_eq.mp h
lemma interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl {s : set α} : interior s = ∅ ↔ dense sᶜ :=
by rw [dense_iff_closure_eq, closure_compl, compl_univ_iff]
lemma dense.interior_compl {s : set α} (h : dense s) : interior sᶜ = ∅ :=
interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl.2 $ by rwa compl_compl
/-- The closure of a set `s` is dense if and only if `s` is dense. -/
@[simp] lemma dense_closure {s : set α} : dense (closure s) ↔ dense s :=
by rw [dense, dense, closure_closure]
alias dense_closure ↔ dense.of_closure dense.closure
@[simp] lemma dense_univ : dense (univ : set α) := λ x, subset_closure trivial
/-- A set is dense if and only if it has a nonempty intersection with each nonempty open set. -/
lemma dense_iff_inter_open {s : set α} :
dense s ↔ ∀ U, is_open U → U.nonempty → (U ∩ s).nonempty :=
begin
split ; intro h,
{ rintros U U_op ⟨x, x_in⟩,
exact mem_closure_iff.1 (by simp only [h.closure_eq]) U U_op x_in },
{ intro x,
rw mem_closure_iff,
intros U U_op x_in,
exact h U U_op ⟨_, x_in⟩ },
end
alias dense_iff_inter_open ↔ dense.inter_open_nonempty _
lemma dense.exists_mem_open {s : set α} (hs : dense s) {U : set α} (ho : is_open U)
(hne : U.nonempty) :
∃ x ∈ s, x ∈ U :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hs.inter_open_nonempty U ho hne in ⟨x, hx.2, hx.1⟩
lemma dense.nonempty_iff {s : set α} (hs : dense s) :
s.nonempty ↔ nonempty α :=
⟨λ ⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨x⟩, λ ⟨x⟩,
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hs.inter_open_nonempty _ is_open_univ ⟨x, trivial⟩ in ⟨y, hy.2⟩⟩
lemma dense.nonempty [h : nonempty α] {s : set α} (hs : dense s) : s.nonempty :=
hs.nonempty_iff.2 h
@[mono]
lemma dense.mono {s₁ s₂ : set α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hd : dense s₁) : dense s₂ :=
λ x, closure_mono h (hd x)
/-- Complement to a singleton is dense if and only if the singleton is not an open set. -/
lemma dense_compl_singleton_iff_not_open {x : α} : dense ({x}ᶜ : set α) ↔ ¬is_open ({x} : set α) :=
begin
fsplit,
{ intros hd ho,
exact (hd.inter_open_nonempty _ ho (singleton_nonempty _)).ne_empty (inter_compl_self _) },
{ refine λ ho, dense_iff_inter_open.2 (λ U hU hne, inter_compl_nonempty_iff.2 $ λ hUx, _),
obtain rfl : U = {x}, from eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem.2 ⟨hne, hUx⟩,
exact ho hU }
end
/-!
### Frontier of a set
-/
/-- The frontier of a set is the set of points between the closure and interior. -/
def frontier (s : set α) : set α := closure s \ interior s
lemma frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure {s : set α} :
frontier s = closure s ∩ closure sᶜ :=
by rw [closure_compl, frontier, diff_eq]
lemma frontier_subset_closure {s : set α} : frontier s ⊆ closure s := diff_subset _ _
/-- The complement of a set has the same frontier as the original set. -/
@[simp] lemma frontier_compl (s : set α) : frontier sᶜ = frontier s :=
by simp only [frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure, compl_compl, inter_comm]
@[simp] lemma frontier_univ : frontier (univ : set α) = ∅ := by simp [frontier]
@[simp] lemma frontier_empty : frontier (∅ : set α) = ∅ := by simp [frontier]
lemma frontier_inter_subset (s t : set α) :
frontier (s ∩ t) ⊆ (frontier s ∩ closure t) ∪ (closure s ∩ frontier t) :=
begin
simp only [frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure, compl_inter, closure_union],
convert inter_subset_inter_left _ (closure_inter_subset_inter_closure s t),
simp only [inter_distrib_left, inter_distrib_right, inter_assoc],
congr' 2,
apply inter_comm
end
lemma frontier_union_subset (s t : set α) :
frontier (s ∪ t) ⊆ (frontier s ∩ closure tᶜ) ∪ (closure sᶜ ∩ frontier t) :=
by simpa only [frontier_compl, ← compl_union]
using frontier_inter_subset sᶜ tᶜ
lemma is_closed.frontier_eq {s : set α} (hs : is_closed s) : frontier s = s \ interior s :=
by rw [frontier, hs.closure_eq]
lemma is_open.frontier_eq {s : set α} (hs : is_open s) : frontier s = closure s \ s :=
by rw [frontier, hs.interior_eq]
lemma is_open.inter_frontier_eq {s : set α} (hs : is_open s) : s ∩ frontier s = ∅ :=
by rw [hs.frontier_eq, inter_diff_self]
/-- The frontier of a set is closed. -/
lemma is_closed_frontier {s : set α} : is_closed (frontier s) :=
by rw frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure; exact is_closed.inter is_closed_closure is_closed_closure
/-- The frontier of a closed set has no interior point. -/
lemma interior_frontier {s : set α} (h : is_closed s) : interior (frontier s) = ∅ :=
begin
have A : frontier s = s \ interior s, from h.frontier_eq,
have B : interior (frontier s) ⊆ interior s, by rw A; exact interior_mono (diff_subset _ _),
have C : interior (frontier s) ⊆ frontier s := interior_subset,
have : interior (frontier s) ⊆ (interior s) ∩ (s \ interior s) :=
subset_inter B (by simpa [A] using C),
rwa [inter_diff_self, subset_empty_iff] at this,
end
lemma closure_eq_interior_union_frontier (s : set α) : closure s = interior s ∪ frontier s :=
(union_diff_cancel interior_subset_closure).symm
lemma closure_eq_self_union_frontier (s : set α) : closure s = s ∪ frontier s :=
(union_diff_cancel' interior_subset subset_closure).symm
lemma is_open.inter_frontier_eq_empty_of_disjoint {s t : set α} (ht : is_open t)
(hd : disjoint s t) :
t ∩ frontier s = ∅ :=
begin
rw [inter_comm, ← subset_compl_iff_disjoint],
exact subset.trans frontier_subset_closure (closure_minimal (λ _, disjoint_left.1 hd)
(is_closed_compl_iff.2 ht))
end
lemma frontier_eq_inter_compl_interior {s : set α} :
frontier s = (interior s)ᶜ ∩ (interior (sᶜ))ᶜ :=
by { rw [←frontier_compl, ←closure_compl], refl }
lemma compl_frontier_eq_union_interior {s : set α} :
(frontier s)ᶜ = interior s ∪ interior sᶜ :=
begin
rw frontier_eq_inter_compl_interior,
simp only [compl_inter, compl_compl],
end
/-!
### Neighborhoods
-/
/-- A set is called a neighborhood of `a` if it contains an open set around `a`. The set of all
neighborhoods of `a` forms a filter, the neighborhood filter at `a`, is here defined as the
infimum over the principal filters of all open sets containing `a`. -/
@[irreducible] def nhds (a : α) : filter α := (⨅ s ∈ {s : set α | a ∈ s ∧ is_open s}, 𝓟 s)
localized "notation `𝓝` := nhds" in topological_space
/-- The "neighborhood within" filter. Elements of `𝓝[s] a` are sets containing the
intersection of `s` and a neighborhood of `a`. -/
def nhds_within (a : α) (s : set α) : filter α := 𝓝 a ⊓ 𝓟 s
localized "notation `𝓝[` s `] ` x:100 := nhds_within x s" in topological_space
lemma nhds_def (a : α) : 𝓝 a = (⨅ s ∈ {s : set α | a ∈ s ∧ is_open s}, 𝓟 s) := by rw nhds
/-- The open sets containing `a` are a basis for the neighborhood filter. See `nhds_basis_opens'`
for a variant using open neighborhoods instead. -/
lemma nhds_basis_opens (a : α) : (𝓝 a).has_basis (λ s : set α, a ∈ s ∧ is_open s) (λ x, x) :=
begin
rw nhds_def,
exact has_basis_binfi_principal
(λ s ⟨has, hs⟩ t ⟨hat, ht⟩, ⟨s ∩ t, ⟨⟨has, hat⟩, is_open.inter hs ht⟩,
⟨inter_subset_left _ _, inter_subset_right _ _⟩⟩)
⟨univ, ⟨mem_univ a, is_open_univ⟩⟩
end
/-- A filter lies below the neighborhood filter at `a` iff it contains every open set around `a`. -/
lemma le_nhds_iff {f a} : f ≤ 𝓝 a ↔ ∀ s : set α, a ∈ s → is_open s → s ∈ f :=
by simp [nhds_def]
/-- To show a filter is above the neighborhood filter at `a`, it suffices to show that it is above
the principal filter of some open set `s` containing `a`. -/
lemma nhds_le_of_le {f a} {s : set α} (h : a ∈ s) (o : is_open s) (sf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : 𝓝 a ≤ f :=
by rw nhds_def; exact infi_le_of_le s (infi_le_of_le ⟨h, o⟩ sf)
lemma mem_nhds_iff {a : α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ ∃t⊆s, is_open t ∧ a ∈ t :=
(nhds_basis_opens a).mem_iff.trans
⟨λ ⟨t, ⟨hat, ht⟩, hts⟩, ⟨t, hts, ht, hat⟩, λ ⟨t, hts, ht, hat⟩, ⟨t, ⟨hat, ht⟩, hts⟩⟩
/-- A predicate is true in a neighborhood of `a` iff it is true for all the points in an open set
containing `a`. -/
lemma eventually_nhds_iff {a : α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, p x) ↔ ∃ (t : set α), (∀ x ∈ t, p x) ∧ is_open t ∧ a ∈ t :=
mem_nhds_iff.trans $ by simp only [subset_def, exists_prop, mem_set_of_eq]
lemma map_nhds {a : α} {f : α → β} :
map f (𝓝 a) = (⨅ s ∈ {s : set α | a ∈ s ∧ is_open s}, 𝓟 (image f s)) :=
((nhds_basis_opens a).map f).eq_binfi
lemma mem_of_mem_nhds {a : α} {s : set α} : s ∈ 𝓝 a → a ∈ s :=
λ H, let ⟨t, ht, _, hs⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.1 H in ht hs
/-- If a predicate is true in a neighborhood of `a`, then it is true for `a`. -/
lemma filter.eventually.self_of_nhds {p : α → Prop} {a : α}
(h : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, p y) : p a :=
mem_of_mem_nhds h
lemma is_open.mem_nhds {a : α} {s : set α} (hs : is_open s) (ha : a ∈ s) :
s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
mem_nhds_iff.2 ⟨s, subset.refl _, hs, ha⟩
lemma is_closed.compl_mem_nhds {a : α} {s : set α} (hs : is_closed s) (ha : a ∉ s) : sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 a :=
hs.is_open_compl.mem_nhds (mem_compl ha)
lemma is_open.eventually_mem {a : α} {s : set α} (hs : is_open s) (ha : a ∈ s) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s :=
is_open.mem_nhds hs ha
/-- The open neighborhoods of `a` are a basis for the neighborhood filter. See `nhds_basis_opens`
for a variant using open sets around `a` instead. -/
lemma nhds_basis_opens' (a : α) : (𝓝 a).has_basis (λ s : set α, s ∈ 𝓝 a ∧ is_open s) (λ x, x) :=
begin
convert nhds_basis_opens a,
ext s,
split,
{ rintros ⟨s_in, s_op⟩,
exact ⟨mem_of_mem_nhds s_in, s_op⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨a_in, s_op⟩,
exact ⟨is_open.mem_nhds s_op a_in, s_op⟩ },
end
/-- If `U` is a neighborhood of each point of a set `s` then it is a neighborhood of `s`:
it contains an open set containing `s`. -/
lemma exists_open_set_nhds {s U : set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, U ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ V : set α, s ⊆ V ∧ is_open V ∧ V ⊆ U :=
begin
have := λ x hx, (nhds_basis_opens x).mem_iff.1 (h x hx),
choose! Z hZ hZ' using this,
refine ⟨⋃ x ∈ s, Z x, _, _, bUnion_subset hZ'⟩,
{ intros x hx,
simp only [mem_Union],
exact ⟨x, hx, (hZ x hx).1⟩ },
{ apply is_open_Union,
intros x,
by_cases hx : x ∈ s ; simp [hx],
exact (hZ x hx).2 }
end
/-- If `U` is a neighborhood of each point of a set `s` then it is a neighborhood of s:
it contains an open set containing `s`. -/
lemma exists_open_set_nhds' {s U : set α} (h : U ∈ ⨆ x ∈ s, 𝓝 x) :
∃ V : set α, s ⊆ V ∧ is_open V ∧ V ⊆ U :=
exists_open_set_nhds (by simpa using h)
/-- If a predicate is true in a neighbourhood of `a`, then for `y` sufficiently close
to `a` this predicate is true in a neighbourhood of `y`. -/
lemma filter.eventually.eventually_nhds {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (h : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, p y) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 y, p x :=
let ⟨t, htp, hto, ha⟩ := eventually_nhds_iff.1 h in
eventually_nhds_iff.2 ⟨t, λ x hx, eventually_nhds_iff.2 ⟨t, htp, hto, hx⟩, hto, ha⟩
@[simp] lemma eventually_eventually_nhds {p : α → Prop} {a : α} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, p x :=
⟨λ h, h.self_of_nhds, λ h, h.eventually_nhds⟩
@[simp] lemma nhds_bind_nhds : (𝓝 a).bind 𝓝 = 𝓝 a := filter.ext $ λ s, eventually_eventually_nhds
@[simp] lemma eventually_eventually_eq_nhds {f g : α → β} {a : α} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, f =ᶠ[𝓝 y] g) ↔ f =ᶠ[𝓝 a] g :=
eventually_eventually_nhds
lemma filter.eventually_eq.eq_of_nhds {f g : α → β} {a : α} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 a] g) : f a = g a :=
h.self_of_nhds
@[simp] lemma eventually_eventually_le_nhds [has_le β] {f g : α → β} {a : α} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, f ≤ᶠ[𝓝 y] g) ↔ f ≤ᶠ[𝓝 a] g :=
eventually_eventually_nhds
/-- If two functions are equal in a neighbourhood of `a`, then for `y` sufficiently close
to `a` these functions are equal in a neighbourhood of `y`. -/
lemma filter.eventually_eq.eventually_eq_nhds {f g : α → β} {a : α} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 a] g) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, f =ᶠ[𝓝 y] g :=
h.eventually_nhds
/-- If `f x ≤ g x` in a neighbourhood of `a`, then for `y` sufficiently close to `a` we have
`f x ≤ g x` in a neighbourhood of `y`. -/
lemma filter.eventually_le.eventually_le_nhds [has_le β] {f g : α → β} {a : α} (h : f ≤ᶠ[𝓝 a] g) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, f ≤ᶠ[𝓝 y] g :=
h.eventually_nhds
theorem all_mem_nhds (x : α) (P : set α → Prop) (hP : ∀ s t, s ⊆ t → P s → P t) :
(∀ s ∈ 𝓝 x, P s) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → x ∈ s → P s) :=
((nhds_basis_opens x).forall_iff hP).trans $ by simp only [and_comm (x ∈ _), and_imp]
theorem all_mem_nhds_filter (x : α) (f : set α → set β) (hf : ∀ s t, s ⊆ t → f s ⊆ f t)
(l : filter β) :
(∀ s ∈ 𝓝 x, f s ∈ l) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → x ∈ s → f s ∈ l) :=
all_mem_nhds _ _ (λ s t ssubt h, mem_of_superset h (hf s t ssubt))
theorem rtendsto_nhds {r : rel β α} {l : filter β} {a : α} :
rtendsto r l (𝓝 a) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → a ∈ s → r.core s ∈ l) :=
all_mem_nhds_filter _ _ (λ s t, id) _
theorem rtendsto'_nhds {r : rel β α} {l : filter β} {a : α} :
rtendsto' r l (𝓝 a) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → a ∈ s → r.preimage s ∈ l) :=
by { rw [rtendsto'_def], apply all_mem_nhds_filter, apply rel.preimage_mono }
theorem ptendsto_nhds {f : β →. α} {l : filter β} {a : α} :
ptendsto f l (𝓝 a) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → a ∈ s → f.core s ∈ l) :=
rtendsto_nhds
theorem ptendsto'_nhds {f : β →. α} {l : filter β} {a : α} :
ptendsto' f l (𝓝 a) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → a ∈ s → f.preimage s ∈ l) :=
rtendsto'_nhds
theorem tendsto_nhds {f : β → α} {l : filter β} {a : α} :
tendsto f l (𝓝 a) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → a ∈ s → f ⁻¹' s ∈ l) :=
all_mem_nhds_filter _ _ (λ s t h, preimage_mono h) _
lemma tendsto_const_nhds {a : α} {f : filter β} : tendsto (λb:β, a) f (𝓝 a) :=
tendsto_nhds.mpr $ assume s hs ha, univ_mem' $ assume _, ha
lemma tendsto_at_top_of_eventually_const {ι : Type*} [semilattice_sup ι] [nonempty ι]
{x : α} {u : ι → α} {i₀ : ι} (h : ∀ i ≥ i₀, u i = x) : tendsto u at_top (𝓝 x) :=
tendsto.congr' (eventually_eq.symm (eventually_at_top.mpr ⟨i₀, h⟩)) tendsto_const_nhds
lemma tendsto_at_bot_of_eventually_const {ι : Type*} [semilattice_inf ι] [nonempty ι]
{x : α} {u : ι → α} {i₀ : ι} (h : ∀ i ≤ i₀, u i = x) : tendsto u at_bot (𝓝 x) :=
tendsto.congr' (eventually_eq.symm (eventually_at_bot.mpr ⟨i₀, h⟩)) tendsto_const_nhds
lemma pure_le_nhds : pure ≤ (𝓝 : α → filter α) :=
assume a s hs, mem_pure.2 $ mem_of_mem_nhds hs
lemma tendsto_pure_nhds {α : Type*} [topological_space β] (f : α → β) (a : α) :
tendsto f (pure a) (𝓝 (f a)) :=
(tendsto_pure_pure f a).mono_right (pure_le_nhds _)
lemma order_top.tendsto_at_top_nhds {α : Type*} [partial_order α] [order_top α]
[topological_space β] (f : α → β) : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 $ f ⊤) :=
(tendsto_at_top_pure f).mono_right (pure_le_nhds _)
@[simp] instance nhds_ne_bot {a : α} : ne_bot (𝓝 a) :=
ne_bot_of_le (pure_le_nhds a)
/-!
### Cluster points
In this section we define [cluster points](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limit_point)
(also known as limit points and accumulation points) of a filter and of a sequence.
-/
/-- A point `x` is a cluster point of a filter `F` if 𝓝 x ⊓ F ≠ ⊥. Also known as
an accumulation point or a limit point. -/
def cluster_pt (x : α) (F : filter α) : Prop := ne_bot (𝓝 x ⊓ F)
lemma cluster_pt.ne_bot {x : α} {F : filter α} (h : cluster_pt x F) : ne_bot (𝓝 x ⊓ F) := h
lemma filter.has_basis.cluster_pt_iff {ιa ιF} {pa : ιa → Prop} {sa : ιa → set α}
{pF : ιF → Prop} {sF : ιF → set α} {F : filter α}
(ha : (𝓝 a).has_basis pa sa) (hF : F.has_basis pF sF) :
cluster_pt a F ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄ (hi : pa i) ⦃j⦄ (hj : pF j), (sa i ∩ sF j).nonempty :=
ha.inf_basis_ne_bot_iff hF
lemma cluster_pt_iff {x : α} {F : filter α} :
cluster_pt x F ↔ ∀ ⦃U : set α⦄ (hU : U ∈ 𝓝 x) ⦃V⦄ (hV : V ∈ F), (U ∩ V).nonempty :=
inf_ne_bot_iff
/-- `x` is a cluster point of a set `s` if every neighbourhood of `x` meets `s` on a nonempty
set. -/
lemma cluster_pt_principal_iff {x : α} {s : set α} :
cluster_pt x (𝓟 s) ↔ ∀ U ∈ 𝓝 x, (U ∩ s).nonempty :=
inf_principal_ne_bot_iff
lemma cluster_pt_principal_iff_frequently {x : α} {s : set α} :
cluster_pt x (𝓟 s) ↔ ∃ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ∈ s :=
by simp only [cluster_pt_principal_iff, frequently_iff, set.nonempty, exists_prop, mem_inter_iff]
lemma cluster_pt.of_le_nhds {x : α} {f : filter α} (H : f ≤ 𝓝 x) [ne_bot f] : cluster_pt x f :=
by rwa [cluster_pt, inf_eq_right.mpr H]
lemma cluster_pt.of_le_nhds' {x : α} {f : filter α} (H : f ≤ 𝓝 x) (hf : ne_bot f) :
cluster_pt x f :=
cluster_pt.of_le_nhds H
lemma cluster_pt.of_nhds_le {x : α} {f : filter α} (H : 𝓝 x ≤ f) : cluster_pt x f :=
by simp only [cluster_pt, inf_eq_left.mpr H, nhds_ne_bot]
lemma cluster_pt.mono {x : α} {f g : filter α} (H : cluster_pt x f) (h : f ≤ g) :
cluster_pt x g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot H.ne $ inf_le_inf_left _ h⟩
lemma cluster_pt.of_inf_left {x : α} {f g : filter α} (H : cluster_pt x $ f ⊓ g) :
cluster_pt x f :=
H.mono inf_le_left
lemma cluster_pt.of_inf_right {x : α} {f g : filter α} (H : cluster_pt x $ f ⊓ g) :
cluster_pt x g :=
H.mono inf_le_right
lemma ultrafilter.cluster_pt_iff {x : α} {f : ultrafilter α} : cluster_pt x f ↔ ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x :=
⟨f.le_of_inf_ne_bot', λ h, cluster_pt.of_le_nhds h⟩
/-- A point `x` is a cluster point of a sequence `u` along a filter `F` if it is a cluster point
of `map u F`. -/
def map_cluster_pt {ι :Type*} (x : α) (F : filter ι) (u : ι → α) : Prop := cluster_pt x (map u F)
lemma map_cluster_pt_iff {ι :Type*} (x : α) (F : filter ι) (u : ι → α) :
map_cluster_pt x F u ↔ ∀ s ∈ 𝓝 x, ∃ᶠ a in F, u a ∈ s :=
by { simp_rw [map_cluster_pt, cluster_pt, inf_ne_bot_iff_frequently_left, frequently_map], refl }
lemma map_cluster_pt_of_comp {ι δ :Type*} {F : filter ι} {φ : δ → ι} {p : filter δ}
{x : α} {u : ι → α} [ne_bot p] (h : tendsto φ p F) (H : tendsto (u ∘ φ) p (𝓝 x)) :
map_cluster_pt x F u :=
begin
have := calc
map (u ∘ φ) p = map u (map φ p) : map_map
... ≤ map u F : map_mono h,
have : map (u ∘ φ) p ≤ 𝓝 x ⊓ map u F,
from le_inf H this,
exact ne_bot_of_le this
end
/-!
### Interior, closure and frontier in terms of neighborhoods
-/
lemma interior_eq_nhds' {s : set α} : interior s = {a | s ∈ 𝓝 a} :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_interior, mem_nhds_iff, mem_set_of_eq]
lemma interior_eq_nhds {s : set α} : interior s = {a | 𝓝 a ≤ 𝓟 s} :=
interior_eq_nhds'.trans $ by simp only [le_principal_iff]
lemma mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds {s : set α} {a : α} :
a ∈ interior s ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
by rw [interior_eq_nhds', mem_set_of_eq]
@[simp] lemma interior_mem_nhds {s : set α} {a : α} :
interior s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
⟨λ h, mem_of_superset h interior_subset,
λ h, is_open.mem_nhds is_open_interior (mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 h)⟩
lemma interior_set_of_eq {p : α → Prop} :
interior {x | p x} = {x | ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y} :=
interior_eq_nhds'
lemma is_open_set_of_eventually_nhds {p : α → Prop} :
is_open {x | ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y} :=
by simp only [← interior_set_of_eq, is_open_interior]
lemma subset_interior_iff_nhds {s V : set α} : s ⊆ interior V ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, V ∈ 𝓝 x :=
show (∀ x, x ∈ s → x ∈ _) ↔ _, by simp_rw mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds
lemma is_open_iff_nhds {s : set α} : is_open s ↔ ∀a∈s, 𝓝 a ≤ 𝓟 s :=
calc is_open s ↔ s ⊆ interior s : subset_interior_iff_open.symm
... ↔ (∀a∈s, 𝓝 a ≤ 𝓟 s) : by rw [interior_eq_nhds]; refl
lemma is_open_iff_mem_nhds {s : set α} : is_open s ↔ ∀a∈s, s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
is_open_iff_nhds.trans $ forall_congr $ λ _, imp_congr_right $ λ _, le_principal_iff
theorem is_open_iff_ultrafilter {s : set α} :
is_open s ↔ (∀ (x ∈ s) (l : ultrafilter α), ↑l ≤ 𝓝 x → s ∈ l) :=
by simp_rw [is_open_iff_mem_nhds, ← mem_iff_ultrafilter]
lemma mem_closure_iff_frequently {s : set α} {a : α} : a ∈ closure s ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s :=
by rw [filter.frequently, filter.eventually, ← mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds,
closure_eq_compl_interior_compl]; refl
alias mem_closure_iff_frequently ↔ _ filter.frequently.mem_closure
/-- The set of cluster points of a filter is closed. In particular, the set of limit points
of a sequence is closed. -/
lemma is_closed_set_of_cluster_pt {f : filter α} : is_closed {x | cluster_pt x f} :=
begin
simp only [cluster_pt, inf_ne_bot_iff_frequently_left, set_of_forall, imp_iff_not_or],
refine is_closed_Inter (λ p, is_closed.union _ _); apply is_closed_compl_iff.2,
exacts [is_open_set_of_eventually_nhds, is_open_const]
end
theorem mem_closure_iff_cluster_pt {s : set α} {a : α} : a ∈ closure s ↔ cluster_pt a (𝓟 s) :=
mem_closure_iff_frequently.trans cluster_pt_principal_iff_frequently.symm
lemma mem_closure_iff_nhds_ne_bot {s : set α} : a ∈ closure s ↔ 𝓝 a ⊓ 𝓟 s ≠ ⊥ :=
mem_closure_iff_cluster_pt.trans ne_bot_iff
lemma mem_closure_iff_nhds_within_ne_bot {s : set α} {x : α} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ne_bot (𝓝[s] x) :=
mem_closure_iff_cluster_pt
/-- If `x` is not an isolated point of a topological space, then `{x}ᶜ` is dense in the whole
space. -/
lemma dense_compl_singleton (x : α) [ne_bot (𝓝[{x}ᶜ] x)] : dense ({x}ᶜ : set α) :=
begin
intro y,
unfreezingI { rcases eq_or_ne y x with rfl|hne },
{ rwa mem_closure_iff_nhds_within_ne_bot },
{ exact subset_closure hne }
end
/-- If `x` is not an isolated point of a topological space, then the closure of `{x}ᶜ` is the whole
space. -/
@[simp] lemma closure_compl_singleton (x : α) [ne_bot (𝓝[{x}ᶜ] x)] :
closure {x}ᶜ = (univ : set α) :=
(dense_compl_singleton x).closure_eq
/-- If `x` is not an isolated point of a topological space, then the interior of `{x}ᶜ` is empty. -/
@[simp] lemma interior_singleton (x : α) [ne_bot (𝓝[{x}ᶜ] x)] :
interior {x} = (∅ : set α) :=
interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl.2 (dense_compl_singleton x)
lemma closure_eq_cluster_pts {s : set α} : closure s = {a | cluster_pt a (𝓟 s)} :=
set.ext $ λ x, mem_closure_iff_cluster_pt
theorem mem_closure_iff_nhds {s : set α} {a : α} :
a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ t ∈ 𝓝 a, (t ∩ s).nonempty :=
mem_closure_iff_cluster_pt.trans cluster_pt_principal_iff
theorem mem_closure_iff_nhds' {s : set α} {a : α} :
a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ t ∈ 𝓝 a, ∃ y : s, ↑y ∈ t :=
by simp only [mem_closure_iff_nhds, set.nonempty_inter_iff_exists_right]
theorem mem_closure_iff_comap_ne_bot {A : set α} {x : α} :
x ∈ closure A ↔ ne_bot (comap (coe : A → α) (𝓝 x)) :=
by simp_rw [mem_closure_iff_nhds, comap_ne_bot_iff, set.nonempty_inter_iff_exists_right]
theorem mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis' {a : α} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α} (h : (𝓝 a).has_basis p s)
{t : set α} :
a ∈ closure t ↔ ∀ i, p i → (s i ∩ t).nonempty :=
mem_closure_iff_cluster_pt.trans $ (h.cluster_pt_iff (has_basis_principal _)).trans $
by simp only [exists_prop, forall_const]
theorem mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis {a : α} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → set α} (h : (𝓝 a).has_basis p s)
{t : set α} :
a ∈ closure t ↔ ∀ i, p i → ∃ y ∈ t, y ∈ s i :=
(mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis' h).trans $
by simp only [set.nonempty, mem_inter_eq, exists_prop, and_comm]
/-- `x` belongs to the closure of `s` if and only if some ultrafilter
supported on `s` converges to `x`. -/
lemma mem_closure_iff_ultrafilter {s : set α} {x : α} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∃ (u : ultrafilter α), s ∈ u ∧ ↑u ≤ 𝓝 x :=
by simp [closure_eq_cluster_pts, cluster_pt, ← exists_ultrafilter_iff, and.comm]
lemma is_closed_iff_cluster_pt {s : set α} : is_closed s ↔ ∀a, cluster_pt a (𝓟 s) → a ∈ s :=
calc is_closed s ↔ closure s ⊆ s : closure_subset_iff_is_closed.symm
... ↔ (∀a, cluster_pt a (𝓟 s) → a ∈ s) : by simp only [subset_def, mem_closure_iff_cluster_pt]
lemma is_closed_iff_nhds {s : set α} : is_closed s ↔ ∀ x, (∀ U ∈ 𝓝 x, (U ∩ s).nonempty) → x ∈ s :=
by simp_rw [is_closed_iff_cluster_pt, cluster_pt, inf_principal_ne_bot_iff]
lemma closure_inter_open {s t : set α} (h : is_open s) : s ∩ closure t ⊆ closure (s ∩ t) :=
begin
rintro a ⟨hs, ht⟩,
have : s ∈ 𝓝 a := is_open.mem_nhds h hs,
rw mem_closure_iff_nhds_ne_bot at ht ⊢,
rwa [← inf_principal, ← inf_assoc, inf_eq_left.2 (le_principal_iff.2 this)],
end
lemma closure_inter_open' {s t : set α} (h : is_open t) : closure s ∩ t ⊆ closure (s ∩ t) :=
by simpa only [inter_comm] using closure_inter_open h
lemma dense.open_subset_closure_inter {s t : set α} (hs : dense s) (ht : is_open t) :
t ⊆ closure (t ∩ s) :=
calc t = t ∩ closure s : by rw [hs.closure_eq, inter_univ]
... ⊆ closure (t ∩ s) : closure_inter_open ht
lemma mem_closure_of_mem_closure_union {s₁ s₂ : set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ closure (s₁ ∪ s₂))
(h₁ : s₁ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x) : x ∈ closure s₂ :=
begin
rw mem_closure_iff_nhds_ne_bot at *,
rwa ← calc
𝓝 x ⊓ principal (s₁ ∪ s₂) = 𝓝 x ⊓ (principal s₁ ⊔ principal s₂) : by rw sup_principal
... = (𝓝 x ⊓ principal s₁) ⊔ (𝓝 x ⊓ principal s₂) : inf_sup_left
... = ⊥ ⊔ 𝓝 x ⊓ principal s₂ : by rw inf_principal_eq_bot.mpr h₁
... = 𝓝 x ⊓ principal s₂ : bot_sup_eq
end
/-- The intersection of an open dense set with a dense set is a dense set. -/
lemma dense.inter_of_open_left {s t : set α} (hs : dense s) (ht : dense t) (hso : is_open s) :
dense (s ∩ t) :=
λ x, (closure_minimal (closure_inter_open hso) is_closed_closure) $
by simp [hs.closure_eq, ht.closure_eq]
/-- The intersection of a dense set with an open dense set is a dense set. -/
lemma dense.inter_of_open_right {s t : set α} (hs : dense s) (ht : dense t) (hto : is_open t) :
dense (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_of_open_left hs hto
lemma dense.inter_nhds_nonempty {s t : set α} (hs : dense s) {x : α} (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
(s ∩ t).nonempty :=
let ⟨U, hsub, ho, hx⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.1 ht in
(hs.inter_open_nonempty U ho ⟨x, hx⟩).mono $ λ y hy, ⟨hy.2, hsub hy.1⟩
lemma closure_diff {s t : set α} : closure s \ closure t ⊆ closure (s \ t) :=
calc closure s \ closure t = (closure t)ᶜ ∩ closure s : by simp only [diff_eq, inter_comm]
... ⊆ closure ((closure t)ᶜ ∩ s) : closure_inter_open $ is_open_compl_iff.mpr $ is_closed_closure
... = closure (s \ closure t) : by simp only [diff_eq, inter_comm]
... ⊆ closure (s \ t) : closure_mono $ diff_subset_diff (subset.refl s) subset_closure
lemma filter.frequently.mem_of_closed {a : α} {s : set α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s)
(hs : is_closed s) : a ∈ s :=
hs.closure_subset h.mem_closure
lemma is_closed.mem_of_frequently_of_tendsto {f : β → α} {b : filter β} {a : α} {s : set α}
(hs : is_closed s) (h : ∃ᶠ x in b, f x ∈ s) (hf : tendsto f b (𝓝 a)) : a ∈ s :=
(hf.frequently $ show ∃ᶠ x in b, (λ y, y ∈ s) (f x), from h).mem_of_closed hs
lemma is_closed.mem_of_tendsto {f : β → α} {b : filter β} {a : α} {s : set α}
[ne_bot b] (hs : is_closed s) (hf : tendsto f b (𝓝 a)) (h : ∀ᶠ x in b, f x ∈ s) : a ∈ s :=
hs.mem_of_frequently_of_tendsto h.frequently hf
lemma mem_closure_of_tendsto {f : β → α} {b : filter β} {a : α} {s : set α}
[ne_bot b] (hf : tendsto f b (𝓝 a)) (h : ∀ᶠ x in b, f x ∈ s) : a ∈ closure s :=
is_closed_closure.mem_of_tendsto hf $ h.mono (preimage_mono subset_closure)
/-- Suppose that `f` sends the complement to `s` to a single point `a`, and `l` is some filter.
Then `f` tends to `a` along `l` restricted to `s` if and only if it tends to `a` along `l`. -/
lemma tendsto_inf_principal_nhds_iff_of_forall_eq {f : β → α} {l : filter β} {s : set β}
{a : α} (h : ∀ x ∉ s, f x = a) :
tendsto f (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) (𝓝 a) ↔ tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
begin
rw [tendsto_iff_comap, tendsto_iff_comap],
replace h : 𝓟 sᶜ ≤ comap f (𝓝 a),
{ rintros U ⟨t, ht, htU⟩ x hx,
have : f x ∈ t, from (h x hx).symm ▸ mem_of_mem_nhds ht,
exact htU this },
refine ⟨λ h', _, le_trans inf_le_left⟩,
have := sup_le h' h,
rw [sup_inf_right, sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ,
inf_top_eq, sup_le_iff] at this,
exact this.1
end
/-!
### Limits of filters in topological spaces
-/
section lim
/-- If `f` is a filter, then `Lim f` is a limit of the filter, if it exists. -/
noncomputable def Lim [nonempty α] (f : filter α) : α := epsilon $ λa, f ≤ 𝓝 a
/--
If `f` is a filter satisfying `ne_bot f`, then `Lim' f` is a limit of the filter, if it exists.
-/
def Lim' (f : filter α) [ne_bot f] : α := @Lim _ _ (nonempty_of_ne_bot f) f
/--
If `F` is an ultrafilter, then `filter.ultrafilter.Lim F` is a limit of the filter, if it exists.
Note that dot notation `F.Lim` can be used for `F : ultrafilter α`.
-/
def ultrafilter.Lim : ultrafilter α → α := λ F, Lim' F
/-- If `f` is a filter in `β` and `g : β → α` is a function, then `lim f` is a limit of `g` at `f`,
if it exists. -/
noncomputable def lim [nonempty α] (f : filter β) (g : β → α) : α :=
Lim (f.map g)
/-- If a filter `f` is majorated by some `𝓝 a`, then it is majorated by `𝓝 (Lim f)`. We formulate
this lemma with a `[nonempty α]` argument of `Lim` derived from `h` to make it useful for types
without a `[nonempty α]` instance. Because of the built-in proof irrelevance, Lean will unify
this instance with any other instance. -/
lemma le_nhds_Lim {f : filter α} (h : ∃a, f ≤ 𝓝 a) : f ≤ 𝓝 (@Lim _ _ (nonempty_of_exists h) f) :=
epsilon_spec h
/-- If `g` tends to some `𝓝 a` along `f`, then it tends to `𝓝 (lim f g)`. We formulate
this lemma with a `[nonempty α]` argument of `lim` derived from `h` to make it useful for types
without a `[nonempty α]` instance. Because of the built-in proof irrelevance, Lean will unify
this instance with any other instance. -/
lemma tendsto_nhds_lim {f : filter β} {g : β → α} (h : ∃ a, tendsto g f (𝓝 a)) :
tendsto g f (𝓝 $ @lim _ _ _ (nonempty_of_exists h) f g) :=
le_nhds_Lim h
end lim
/-!
### Locally finite families
-/
/- locally finite family [General Topology (Bourbaki, 1995)] -/
section locally_finite
/-- A family of sets in `set α` is locally finite if at every point `x:α`,
there is a neighborhood of `x` which meets only finitely many sets in the family -/
def locally_finite (f : β → set α) :=
∀x:α, ∃t ∈ 𝓝 x, finite {i | (f i ∩ t).nonempty }
lemma locally_finite.point_finite {f : β → set α} (hf : locally_finite f) (x : α) :
finite {b | x ∈ f b} :=
let ⟨t, hxt, ht⟩ := hf x in ht.subset $ λ b hb, ⟨x, hb, mem_of_mem_nhds hxt⟩
lemma locally_finite_of_fintype [fintype β] (f : β → set α) : locally_finite f :=
assume x, ⟨univ, univ_mem, finite.of_fintype _⟩
lemma locally_finite.subset
{f₁ f₂ : β → set α} (hf₂ : locally_finite f₂) (hf : ∀b, f₁ b ⊆ f₂ b) : locally_finite f₁ :=
assume a,
let ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := hf₂ a in
⟨t, ht₁, ht₂.subset $ assume i hi, hi.mono $ inter_subset_inter (hf i) $ subset.refl _⟩
lemma locally_finite.comp_injective {ι} {f : β → set α} {g : ι → β} (hf : locally_finite f)
(hg : function.injective g) : locally_finite (f ∘ g) :=
λ x, let ⟨t, htx, htf⟩ := hf x in ⟨t, htx, htf.preimage (hg.inj_on _)⟩
lemma locally_finite.closure {f : β → set α} (hf : locally_finite f) :
locally_finite (λ i, closure (f i)) :=
begin
intro x,
rcases hf x with ⟨s, hsx, hsf⟩,
refine ⟨interior s, interior_mem_nhds.2 hsx, hsf.subset $ λ i hi, _⟩,
exact (hi.mono (closure_inter_open' is_open_interior)).of_closure.mono
(inter_subset_inter_right _ interior_subset)
end
lemma locally_finite.is_closed_Union {f : β → set α}
(h₁ : locally_finite f) (h₂ : ∀i, is_closed (f i)) : is_closed (⋃i, f i) :=
begin
simp only [← is_open_compl_iff, compl_Union, is_open_iff_mem_nhds, mem_Inter],
intros a ha,
replace ha : ∀ i, (f i)ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 a := λ i, (h₂ i).is_open_compl.mem_nhds (ha i),
rcases h₁ a with ⟨t, h_nhds, h_fin⟩,
have : t ∩ (⋂ i ∈ {i | (f i ∩ t).nonempty}, (f i)ᶜ) ∈ 𝓝 a,
from inter_mem h_nhds ((bInter_mem h_fin).2 (λ i _, ha i)),
filter_upwards [this],
simp only [mem_inter_eq, mem_Inter],
rintros b ⟨hbt, hn⟩ i hfb,
exact hn i ⟨b, hfb, hbt⟩ hfb
end
lemma locally_finite.closure_Union {f : β → set α} (h : locally_finite f) :
closure (⋃ i, f i) = ⋃ i, closure (f i) :=
subset.antisymm
(closure_minimal (Union_subset_Union $ λ _, subset_closure) $
h.closure.is_closed_Union $ λ _, is_closed_closure)
(Union_subset $ λ i, closure_mono $ subset_Union _ _)
end locally_finite
end topological_space
/-!
### Continuity
-/
section continuous
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
variables [topological_space α] [topological_space β] [topological_space γ]
open_locale topological_space
/-- A function between topological spaces is continuous if the preimage
of every open set is open. Registered as a structure to make sure it is not unfolded by Lean. -/
structure continuous (f : α → β) : Prop :=
(is_open_preimage : ∀s, is_open s → is_open (f ⁻¹' s))
lemma continuous_def {f : α → β} : continuous f ↔ (∀s, is_open s → is_open (f ⁻¹' s)) :=
⟨λ hf s hs, hf.is_open_preimage s hs, λ h, ⟨h⟩⟩
lemma is_open.preimage {f : α → β} (hf : continuous f) {s : set β} (h : is_open s) :
is_open (f ⁻¹' s) :=
hf.is_open_preimage s h
/-- A function between topological spaces is continuous at a point `x₀`
if `f x` tends to `f x₀` when `x` tends to `x₀`. -/
def continuous_at (f : α → β) (x : α) := tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 (f x))
lemma continuous_at.tendsto {f : α → β} {x : α} (h : continuous_at f x) :
tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 (f x)) :=
h
lemma continuous_at_congr {f g : α → β} {x : α} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) :
continuous_at f x ↔ continuous_at g x :=
by simp only [continuous_at, tendsto_congr' h, h.eq_of_nhds]
lemma continuous_at.congr {f g : α → β} {x : α} (hf : continuous_at f x) (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) :
continuous_at g x :=
(continuous_at_congr h).1 hf
lemma continuous_at.preimage_mem_nhds {f : α → β} {x : α} {t : set β} (h : continuous_at f x)
(ht : t ∈ 𝓝 (f x)) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 x :=
h ht
lemma eventually_eq_zero_nhds {M₀} [has_zero M₀] {a : α} {f : α → M₀} :
f =ᶠ[𝓝 a] 0 ↔ a ∉ closure (function.support f) :=
by rw [← mem_compl_eq, ← interior_compl, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, function.compl_support]; refl
lemma cluster_pt.map {x : α} {la : filter α} {lb : filter β} (H : cluster_pt x la)
{f : α → β} (hfc : continuous_at f x) (hf : tendsto f la lb) :
cluster_pt (f x) lb :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot ((map_ne_bot_iff f).2 H).ne $ hfc.tendsto.inf hf⟩
/-- See also `interior_preimage_subset_preimage_interior`. -/
lemma preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage {f : α → β} {s : set β}
(hf : continuous f) : f⁻¹' (interior s) ⊆ interior (f⁻¹' s) :=
interior_maximal (preimage_mono interior_subset) (is_open_interior.preimage hf)
lemma continuous_id : continuous (id : α → α) :=
continuous_def.2 $ assume s h, h
lemma continuous.comp {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : continuous g) (hf : continuous f) :
continuous (g ∘ f) :=
continuous_def.2 $ assume s h, (h.preimage hg).preimage hf
lemma continuous.iterate {f : α → α} (h : continuous f) (n : ℕ) : continuous (f^[n]) :=
nat.rec_on n continuous_id (λ n ihn, ihn.comp h)
lemma continuous_at.comp {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {x : α}
(hg : continuous_at g (f x)) (hf : continuous_at f x) :
continuous_at (g ∘ f) x :=
hg.comp hf
lemma continuous.tendsto {f : α → β} (hf : continuous f) (x) :
tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 (f x)) :=
((nhds_basis_opens x).tendsto_iff $ nhds_basis_opens $ f x).2 $
λ t ⟨hxt, ht⟩, ⟨f ⁻¹' t, ⟨hxt, ht.preimage hf⟩, subset.refl _⟩
/-- A version of `continuous.tendsto` that allows one to specify a simpler form of the limit.
E.g., one can write `continuous_exp.tendsto' 0 1 exp_zero`. -/
lemma continuous.tendsto' {f : α → β} (hf : continuous f) (x : α) (y : β) (h : f x = y) :
tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) :=
h ▸ hf.tendsto x
lemma continuous.continuous_at {f : α → β} {x : α} (h : continuous f) :
continuous_at f x :=
h.tendsto x
lemma continuous_iff_continuous_at {f : α → β} : continuous f ↔ ∀ x, continuous_at f x :=
⟨continuous.tendsto,
assume hf : ∀x, tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 (f x)),
continuous_def.2 $
assume s, assume hs : is_open s,
have ∀a, f a ∈ s → s ∈ 𝓝 (f a),
from λ a ha, is_open.mem_nhds hs ha,
show is_open (f ⁻¹' s),
from is_open_iff_nhds.2 $ λ a ha, le_principal_iff.2 $ hf _ (this a ha)⟩
lemma continuous_at_const {x : α} {b : β} : continuous_at (λ a:α, b) x :=
tendsto_const_nhds
lemma continuous_const {b : β} : continuous (λa:α, b) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.mpr $ assume a, continuous_at_const
lemma filter.eventually_eq.continuous_at {x : α} {f : α → β} {y : β} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] (λ _, y)) :
continuous_at f x :=
(continuous_at_congr h).2 tendsto_const_nhds
lemma continuous_of_const {f : α → β} (h : ∀ x y, f x = f y) : continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.mpr $ λ x, filter.eventually_eq.continuous_at $
eventually_of_forall (λ y, h y x)
lemma continuous_at_id {x : α} : continuous_at id x :=
continuous_id.continuous_at
lemma continuous_at.iterate {f : α → α} {x : α} (hf : continuous_at f x) (hx : f x = x) (n : ℕ) :
continuous_at (f^[n]) x :=
nat.rec_on n continuous_at_id $ λ n ihn,
show continuous_at (f^[n] ∘ f) x,
from continuous_at.comp (hx.symm ▸ ihn) hf
lemma continuous_iff_is_closed {f : α → β} :
continuous f ↔ (∀s, is_closed s → is_closed (f ⁻¹' s)) :=
⟨assume hf s hs, by simpa using (continuous_def.1 hf sᶜ hs.is_open_compl).is_closed_compl,
assume hf, continuous_def.2 $ assume s,
by rw [←is_closed_compl_iff, ←is_closed_compl_iff]; exact hf _⟩
lemma is_closed.preimage {f : α → β} (hf : continuous f) {s : set β} (h : is_closed s) :
is_closed (f ⁻¹' s) :=
continuous_iff_is_closed.mp hf s h
lemma mem_closure_image {f : α → β} {x : α} {s : set α} (hf : continuous_at f x)
(hx : x ∈ closure s) : f x ∈ closure (f '' s) :=
begin
rw [mem_closure_iff_nhds_ne_bot] at hx ⊢,
rw ← bot_lt_iff_ne_bot,
haveI : ne_bot _ := ⟨hx⟩,
calc
⊥ < map f (𝓝 x ⊓ principal s) : bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr ne_bot.ne'
... ≤ (map f $ 𝓝 x) ⊓ (map f $ principal s) : map_inf_le
... = (map f $ 𝓝 x) ⊓ (principal $ f '' s) : by rw map_principal
... ≤ 𝓝 (f x) ⊓ (principal $ f '' s) : inf_le_inf hf le_rfl
end
lemma continuous_at_iff_ultrafilter {f : α → β} {x} : continuous_at f x ↔
∀ g : ultrafilter α, ↑g ≤ 𝓝 x → tendsto f g (𝓝 (f x)) :=
tendsto_iff_ultrafilter f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 (f x))
lemma continuous_iff_ultrafilter {f : α → β} :
continuous f ↔ ∀ x (g : ultrafilter α), ↑g ≤ 𝓝 x → tendsto f g (𝓝 (f x)) :=
by simp only [continuous_iff_continuous_at, continuous_at_iff_ultrafilter]
lemma continuous.closure_preimage_subset {f : α → β}
(hf : continuous f) (t : set β) :
closure (f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f ⁻¹' (closure t) :=
begin
rw ← (is_closed_closure.preimage hf).closure_eq,
exact closure_mono (preimage_mono subset_closure),
end
lemma continuous.frontier_preimage_subset
{f : α → β} (hf : continuous f) (t : set β) :
frontier (f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f ⁻¹' (frontier t) :=
diff_subset_diff (hf.closure_preimage_subset t) (preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage hf)
/-! ### Continuity and partial functions -/
/-- Continuity of a partial function -/
def pcontinuous (f : α →. β) := ∀ s, is_open s → is_open (f.preimage s)
lemma open_dom_of_pcontinuous {f : α →. β} (h : pcontinuous f) : is_open f.dom :=
by rw [←pfun.preimage_univ]; exact h _ is_open_univ
lemma pcontinuous_iff' {f : α →. β} :
pcontinuous f ↔ ∀ {x y} (h : y ∈ f x), ptendsto' f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) :=
begin
split,
{ intros h x y h',
simp only [ptendsto'_def, mem_nhds_iff],
rintros s ⟨t, tsubs, opent, yt⟩,
exact ⟨f.preimage t, pfun.preimage_mono _ tsubs, h _ opent, ⟨y, yt, h'⟩⟩ },
intros hf s os,
rw is_open_iff_nhds,
rintros x ⟨y, ys, fxy⟩ t,
rw [mem_principal],
assume h : f.preimage s ⊆ t,
change t ∈ 𝓝 x,
apply mem_of_superset _ h,
have h' : ∀ s ∈ 𝓝 y, f.preimage s ∈ 𝓝 x,
{ intros s hs,
have : ptendsto' f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) := hf fxy,
rw ptendsto'_def at this,
exact this s hs },
show f.preimage s ∈ 𝓝 x,
apply h', rw mem_nhds_iff, exact ⟨s, set.subset.refl _, os, ys⟩
end
/-- If a continuous map `f` maps `s` to `t`, then it maps `closure s` to `closure t`. -/
lemma set.maps_to.closure {s : set α} {t : set β} {f : α → β} (h : maps_to f s t)
(hc : continuous f) : maps_to f (closure s) (closure t) :=
begin
simp only [maps_to, mem_closure_iff_cluster_pt],
exact λ x hx, hx.map hc.continuous_at (tendsto_principal_principal.2 h)
end
lemma image_closure_subset_closure_image {f : α → β} {s : set α} (h : continuous f) :
f '' closure s ⊆ closure (f '' s) :=
((maps_to_image f s).closure h).image_subset
lemma closure_subset_preimage_closure_image {f : α → β} {s : set α} (h : continuous f) :
closure s ⊆ f ⁻¹' (closure (f '' s)) :=
by { rw ← set.image_subset_iff, exact image_closure_subset_closure_image h }
lemma map_mem_closure {s : set α} {t : set β} {f : α → β} {a : α}
(hf : continuous f) (ha : a ∈ closure s) (ht : ∀a∈s, f a ∈ t) : f a ∈ closure t :=
set.maps_to.closure ht hf ha
/-!
### Function with dense range
-/
section dense_range
variables {κ ι : Type*} (f : κ → β) (g : β → γ)
/-- `f : ι → β` has dense range if its range (image) is a dense subset of β. -/
def dense_range := dense (range f)
variables {f}
/-- A surjective map has dense range. -/
lemma function.surjective.dense_range (hf : function.surjective f) : dense_range f :=
λ x, by simp [hf.range_eq]
lemma dense_range_iff_closure_range : dense_range f ↔ closure (range f) = univ :=
dense_iff_closure_eq
lemma dense_range.closure_range (h : dense_range f) : closure (range f) = univ :=
h.closure_eq
lemma dense.dense_range_coe {s : set α} (h : dense s) : dense_range (coe : s → α) :=
by simpa only [dense_range, subtype.range_coe_subtype]
lemma continuous.range_subset_closure_image_dense {f : α → β} (hf : continuous f)
{s : set α} (hs : dense s) :
range f ⊆ closure (f '' s) :=
by { rw [← image_univ, ← hs.closure_eq], exact image_closure_subset_closure_image hf }
/-- The image of a dense set under a continuous map with dense range is a dense set. -/
lemma dense_range.dense_image {f : α → β} (hf' : dense_range f) (hf : continuous f)
{s : set α} (hs : dense s) :
dense (f '' s) :=
(hf'.mono $ hf.range_subset_closure_image_dense hs).of_closure
/-- If `f` has dense range and `s` is an open set in the codomain of `f`, then the image of the
preimage of `s` under `f` is dense in `s`. -/
lemma dense_range.subset_closure_image_preimage_of_is_open (hf : dense_range f) {s : set β}
(hs : is_open s) : s ⊆ closure (f '' (f ⁻¹' s)) :=
by { rw image_preimage_eq_inter_range, exact hf.open_subset_closure_inter hs }
/-- If a continuous map with dense range maps a dense set to a subset of `t`, then `t` is a dense
set. -/
lemma dense_range.dense_of_maps_to {f : α → β} (hf' : dense_range f) (hf : continuous f)
{s : set α} (hs : dense s) {t : set β} (ht : maps_to f s t) :
dense t :=
(hf'.dense_image hf hs).mono ht.image_subset
/-- Composition of a continuous map with dense range and a function with dense range has dense
range. -/
lemma dense_range.comp {g : β → γ} {f : κ → β} (hg : dense_range g) (hf : dense_range f)
(cg : continuous g) :
dense_range (g ∘ f) :=
by { rw [dense_range, range_comp], exact hg.dense_image cg hf }
lemma dense_range.nonempty_iff (hf : dense_range f) : nonempty κ ↔ nonempty β :=
range_nonempty_iff_nonempty.symm.trans hf.nonempty_iff
lemma dense_range.nonempty [h : nonempty β] (hf : dense_range f) : nonempty κ :=
hf.nonempty_iff.mpr h
/-- Given a function `f : α → β` with dense range and `b : β`, returns some `a : α`. -/
def dense_range.some (hf : dense_range f) (b : β) : κ :=
classical.choice $ hf.nonempty_iff.mpr ⟨b⟩
lemma dense_range.exists_mem_open (hf : dense_range f) {s : set β} (ho : is_open s)
(hs : s.nonempty) :
∃ a, f a ∈ s :=
exists_range_iff.1 $ hf.exists_mem_open ho hs
lemma dense_range.mem_nhds {f : κ → β} (h : dense_range f) {b : β} {U : set β}
(U_in : U ∈ nhds b) : ∃ a, f a ∈ U :=
begin
rcases (mem_closure_iff_nhds.mp
((dense_range_iff_closure_range.mp h).symm ▸ mem_univ b : b ∈ closure (range f)) U U_in)
with ⟨_, h, a, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨a, h⟩
end
end dense_range
end continuous
/--
The library contains many lemmas stating that functions/operations are continuous. There are many
ways to formulate the continuity of operations. Some are more convenient than others.
Note: for the most part this note also applies to other properties
(`measurable`, `differentiable`, `continuous_on`, ...).
### The traditional way
As an example, let's look at addition `(+) : M → M → M`. We can state that this is continuous
in different definitionally equal ways (omitting some typing information)
* `continuous (λ p, p.1 + p.2)`;
* `continuous (function.uncurry (+))`;
* `continuous ↿(+)`. (`↿` is notation for recursively uncurrying a function)
However, lemmas with this conclusion are not nice to use in practice because
1. They confuse the elaborator. The following two examples fail, because of limitations in the
elaboration process.
```
variables {M : Type*} [has_mul M] [topological_space M] [has_continuous_mul M]
example : continuous (λ x : M, x + x) :=
continuous_add.comp _
example : continuous (λ x : M, x + x) :=
continuous_add.comp (continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_id)
```
The second is a valid proof, which is accepted if you write it as
`continuous_add.comp (continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_id : _)`
2. If the operation has more than 2 arguments, they are impractical to use, because in your
application the arguments in the domain might be in a different order or associated differently.
### The convenient way
A much more convenient way to write continuity lemmas is like `continuous.add`:
```
continuous.add {f g : X → M} (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) : continuous (λ x, f x + g x)
```
The conclusion can be `continuous (f + g)`, which is definitionally equal.
This has the following advantages
* It supports projection notation, so is shorter to write.
* `continuous.add _ _` is recognized correctly by the elaborator and gives useful new goals.
* It works generally, since the domain is a variable.
As an example for an unary operation, we have `continuous.neg`.
```
continuous.neg {f : α → G} (hf : continuous f) : continuous (λ x, -f x)
```
For unary functions, the elaborator is not confused when applying the traditional lemma
(like `continuous_neg`), but it's still convenient to have the short version available (compare
`hf.neg.neg.neg` with `continuous_neg.comp $ continuous_neg.comp $ continuous_neg.comp hf`).
As a harder example, consider an operation of the following type:
```
def strans {x : F} (γ γ' : path x x) (t₀ : I) : path x x
```
The precise definition is not important, only its type.
The correct continuity principle for this operation is something like this:
```
{f : X → F} {γ γ' : ∀ x, path (f x) (f x)} {t₀ s : X → I}
(hγ : continuous ↿γ) (hγ' : continuous ↿γ')
(ht : continuous t₀) (hs : continuous s) :
continuous (λ x, strans (γ x) (γ' x) (t x) (s x))
```
Note that *all* arguments of `strans` are indexed over `X`, even the basepoint `x`, and the last
argument `s` that arises since `path x x` has a coercion to `I → F`. The paths `γ` and `γ'` (which
are unary functions from `I`) become binary functions in the continuity lemma.
### Summary
* Make sure that your continuity lemmas are stated in the most general way, and in a convenient
form. That means that:
- The conclusion has a variable `X` as domain (not something like `Y × Z`);
- Wherever possible, all point arguments `c : Y` are replaced by functions `c : X → Y`;
- All `n`-ary function arguments are replaced by `n+1`-ary functions
(`f : Y → Z` becomes `f : X → Y → Z`);
- All (relevant) arguments have continuity assumptions, and perhaps there are additional
assumptions needed to make the operation continuous;
- The function in the conclusion is fully applied.
* These remarks are mostly about the format of the *conclusion* of a continuity lemma.
In assumptions it's fine to state that a function with more than 1 argument is continuous using
`↿` or `function.uncurry`.
### Functions with discontinuities
In some cases, you want to work with discontinuous functions, and in certain expressions they are
still continuous. For example, consider the fractional part of a number, `fract : ℝ → ℝ`.
In this case, you want to add conditions to when a function involving `fract` is continuous, so you
get something like this: (assumption `hf` could be weakened, but the important thing is the shape
of the conclusion)
```
lemma continuous_on.comp_fract {X Y : Type*} [topological_space X] [topological_space Y]
{f : X → ℝ → Y} {g : X → ℝ} (hf : continuous ↿f) (hg : continuous g) (h : ∀ s, f s 0 = f s 1) :
continuous (λ x, f x (fract (g x)))
```
With `continuous_at` you can be even more precise about what to prove in case of discontinuities,
see e.g. `continuous_at.comp_div_cases`.
-/
library_note "continuity lemma statement"
|
21d2fe2c80c51c995ccbc03780688f8a5dbdddec | f20db13587f4dd28a4b1fbd31953afd491691fa0 | /library/init/meta/lean/parser.lean | a1e305ddfd3e88d16c2b6146333a2a0297a87aef | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | AHartNtkn/lean | 9a971edfc6857c63edcbf96bea6841b9a84cf916 | 0d83a74b26541421fc1aa33044c35b03759710ed | refs/heads/master | 1,620,592,591,236 | 1,516,749,881,000 | 1,516,749,881,000 | 118,697,288 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,516,759,470,000 | 1,516,759,470,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,156 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sebastian Ullrich
-/
prelude
import init.meta.tactic
namespace lean
-- TODO: make inspectable (and pure)
meta constant parser_state : Type
meta constant parser_state.env : parser_state → environment
meta constant parser_state.options : parser_state → options
meta constant parser_state.cur_pos : parser_state → pos
@[reducible] meta def parser := interaction_monad parser_state
@[reducible] meta def parser_result := interaction_monad.result parser_state
open interaction_monad
open interaction_monad.result
namespace parser
variable {α : Type}
meta constant set_env : environment → parser unit
/-- Make sure the next token is an identifier, consume it, and
produce the quoted name `t, where t is the identifier. -/
meta constant ident : parser name
/-- Make sure the next token is a small nat, consume it, and produce it -/
meta constant small_nat : parser nat
/-- Check that the next token is `tk` and consume it. `tk` must be a registered token. -/
meta constant tk (tk : string) : parser unit
/-- Parse an unelaborated expression using the given right-binding power. -/
protected meta constant pexpr (rbp := std.prec.max) : parser pexpr
/-- Do not report info from content parsed by `p`. -/
meta constant skip_info (p : parser α) : parser α
/-- Set goal info position of content parsed by `p` to current position. Nested calls take precedence. -/
meta constant set_goal_info_pos (p : parser α) : parser α
/-- Return the current parser position without consuming any input. -/
meta def cur_pos : parser pos := λ s, success (parser_state.cur_pos s) s
/-- Temporarily replace input of the parser state, run `p`, and return remaining input. -/
meta constant with_input (p : parser α) (input : string) : parser (α × string)
/-- Parse a top-level command. -/
meta constant command_like : parser unit
meta def parser_orelse (p₁ p₂ : parser α) : parser α :=
λ s,
let pos₁ := parser_state.cur_pos s in
result.cases_on (p₁ s)
success
(λ e₁ ref₁ s',
let pos₂ := parser_state.cur_pos s' in
if pos₁ ≠ pos₂ then
exception e₁ ref₁ s'
else result.cases_on (p₂ s)
success
exception)
meta instance : alternative parser :=
{ failure := @interaction_monad.failed _,
orelse := @parser_orelse,
..interaction_monad.monad }
-- TODO: move
meta def {u v} many {f : Type u → Type v} [monad f] [alternative f] {a : Type u} : f a → f (list a)
| x := (do y ← x,
ys ← many x,
return $ y::ys) <|> pure list.nil
local postfix `?`:100 := optional
local postfix `*`:100 := many
meta def sep_by : parser unit → parser α → parser (list α)
| s p := (list.cons <$> p <*> (s *> p)*) <|> return []
meta def tactic_to_parser : tactic α → parser α :=
λ t s, match t (tactic_state.mk_empty s.env s.options) with
| success x ts := (set_env ts.env >> pure x) s
| exception f p _ := exception f p s
end
meta instance : has_coe (tactic α) (parser α) :=
⟨tactic_to_parser⟩
end parser
end lean
|
9618c4214b108133dfcbfa679f72b231d8228fd4 | 9b9a16fa2cb737daee6b2785474678b6fa91d6d4 | /src/order/filter/basic.lean | 96a927b27eb7db751b86611bb4b3656473f5f0e8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | johoelzl/mathlib | 253f46daa30b644d011e8e119025b01ad69735c4 | 592e3c7a2dfbd5826919b4605559d35d4d75938f | refs/heads/master | 1,625,657,216,488 | 1,551,374,946,000 | 1,551,374,946,000 | 98,915,829 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,522,917,267,000 | 1,501,524,499,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 79,639 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
Theory of filters on sets.
-/
import order.galois_connection order.zorn
import data.set.finite data.list data.pfun
import algebra.pi_instances
import category.applicative
open lattice set
universes u v w x y
local attribute [instance] classical.prop_decidable
namespace lattice
variables {α : Type u} {ι : Sort v}
def complete_lattice.copy (c : complete_lattice α)
(le : α → α → Prop) (eq_le : le = @complete_lattice.le α c)
(top : α) (eq_top : top = @complete_lattice.top α c)
(bot : α) (eq_bot : bot = @complete_lattice.bot α c)
(sup : α → α → α) (eq_sup : sup = @complete_lattice.sup α c)
(inf : α → α → α) (eq_inf : inf = @complete_lattice.inf α c)
(Sup : set α → α) (eq_Sup : Sup = @complete_lattice.Sup α c)
(Inf : set α → α) (eq_Inf : Inf = @complete_lattice.Inf α c) :
complete_lattice α :=
begin
refine { le := le, top := top, bot := bot, sup := sup, inf := inf, Sup := Sup, Inf := Inf, ..};
subst_vars,
exact @complete_lattice.le_refl α c,
exact @complete_lattice.le_trans α c,
exact @complete_lattice.le_antisymm α c,
exact @complete_lattice.le_sup_left α c,
exact @complete_lattice.le_sup_right α c,
exact @complete_lattice.sup_le α c,
exact @complete_lattice.inf_le_left α c,
exact @complete_lattice.inf_le_right α c,
exact @complete_lattice.le_inf α c,
exact @complete_lattice.le_top α c,
exact @complete_lattice.bot_le α c,
exact @complete_lattice.le_Sup α c,
exact @complete_lattice.Sup_le α c,
exact @complete_lattice.Inf_le α c,
exact @complete_lattice.le_Inf α c
end
end lattice
open set lattice
section order
variables {α : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop)
local infix `≼` : 50 := r
lemma directed_on_Union {r} {ι : Sort v} {f : ι → set α} (hd : directed (⊆) f)
(h : ∀x, directed_on r (f x)) : directed_on r (⋃x, f x) :=
by simp only [directed_on, exists_prop, mem_Union, exists_imp_distrib]; exact
assume a₁ b₁ fb₁ a₂ b₂ fb₂,
let ⟨z, zb₁, zb₂⟩ := hd b₁ b₂,
⟨x, xf, xa₁, xa₂⟩ := h z a₁ (zb₁ fb₁) a₂ (zb₂ fb₂) in
⟨x, ⟨z, xf⟩, xa₁, xa₂⟩
end order
theorem directed_of_chain {α β r} [is_refl β r] {f : α → β} {c : set α}
(h : zorn.chain (f ⁻¹'o r) c) :
directed r (λx:{a:α // a ∈ c}, f (x.val)) :=
assume ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩, classical.by_cases
(assume : a = b, by simp only [this, exists_prop, and_self, subtype.exists];
exact ⟨b, hb, refl _⟩)
(assume : a ≠ b, (h a ha b hb this).elim
(λ h : r (f a) (f b), ⟨⟨b, hb⟩, h, refl _⟩)
(λ h : r (f b) (f a), ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, refl _, h⟩))
structure filter (α : Type*) :=
(sets : set (set α))
(univ_sets : set.univ ∈ sets)
(sets_of_superset {x y} : x ∈ sets → x ⊆ y → y ∈ sets)
(inter_sets {x y} : x ∈ sets → y ∈ sets → x ∩ y ∈ sets)
namespace filter
variables {α : Type u} {f g : filter α} {s t : set α}
lemma filter_eq : ∀{f g : filter α}, f.sets = g.sets → f = g
| ⟨a, _, _, _⟩ ⟨._, _, _, _⟩ rfl := rfl
lemma filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
protected lemma ext_iff : f = g ↔ ∀ s, s ∈ f.sets ↔ s ∈ g.sets :=
by rw [filter_eq_iff, ext_iff]
@[extensionality]
protected lemma ext : (∀ s, s ∈ f.sets ↔ s ∈ g.sets) → f = g :=
filter.ext_iff.2
lemma univ_mem_sets : univ ∈ f.sets :=
f.univ_sets
lemma mem_sets_of_superset : ∀{x y : set α}, x ∈ f.sets → x ⊆ y → y ∈ f.sets :=
f.sets_of_superset
lemma inter_mem_sets : ∀{s t}, s ∈ f.sets → t ∈ f.sets → s ∩ t ∈ f.sets :=
f.inter_sets
lemma univ_mem_sets' (h : ∀ a, a ∈ s): s ∈ f.sets :=
mem_sets_of_superset univ_mem_sets (assume x _, h x)
lemma mp_sets (hs : s ∈ f.sets) (h : {x | x ∈ s → x ∈ t} ∈ f.sets) : t ∈ f.sets :=
mem_sets_of_superset (inter_mem_sets hs h) $ assume x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₂ h₁
lemma Inter_mem_sets {β : Type v} {s : β → set α} {is : set β} (hf : finite is) :
(∀i∈is, s i ∈ f.sets) → (⋂i∈is, s i) ∈ f.sets :=
finite.induction_on hf
(assume hs, by simp only [univ_mem_sets, mem_empty_eq, Inter_neg, Inter_univ, not_false_iff])
(assume i is _ hf hi hs,
have h₁ : s i ∈ f.sets, from hs i (by simp),
have h₂ : (⋂x∈is, s x) ∈ f.sets, from hi $ assume a ha, hs _ $ by simp only [ha, mem_insert_iff, or_true],
by simp [inter_mem_sets h₁ h₂])
lemma exists_sets_subset_iff : (∃t∈f.sets, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f.sets :=
⟨assume ⟨t, ht, ts⟩, mem_sets_of_superset ht ts, assume hs, ⟨s, hs, subset.refl _⟩⟩
lemma monotone_mem_sets {f : filter α} : monotone (λs, s ∈ f.sets) :=
assume s t hst h, mem_sets_of_superset h hst
end filter
namespace tactic.interactive
open tactic interactive
/-- `filter_upwards [h1, ⋯, hn]` replaces a goal of the form `s ∈ f.sets`
and terms `h1 : t1 ∈ f.sets, ⋯, hn : tn ∈ f.sets` with `∀x, x ∈ t1 → ⋯ → x ∈ tn → x ∈ s`.
`filter_upwards [h1, ⋯, hn] e` is a short form for `{ filter_upwards [h1, ⋯, hn], exact e }`.
-/
meta def filter_upwards
(s : parse types.pexpr_list)
(e' : parse $ optional types.texpr) : tactic unit :=
do
s.reverse.mmap (λ e, eapplyc `filter.mp_sets >> eapply e),
eapplyc `filter.univ_mem_sets',
match e' with
| some e := interactive.exact e
| none := skip
end
end tactic.interactive
namespace filter
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Sort x}
section principal
/-- The principal filter of `s` is the collection of all supersets of `s`. -/
def principal (s : set α) : filter α :=
{ sets := {t | s ⊆ t},
univ_sets := subset_univ s,
sets_of_superset := assume x y hx hy, subset.trans hx hy,
inter_sets := assume x y, subset_inter }
instance : inhabited (filter α) :=
⟨principal ∅⟩
@[simp] lemma mem_principal_sets {s t : set α} : s ∈ (principal t).sets ↔ t ⊆ s := iff.rfl
lemma mem_principal_self (s : set α) : s ∈ (principal s).sets := subset.refl _
end principal
section join
/-- The join of a filter of filters is defined by the relation `s ∈ join f ↔ {t | s ∈ t} ∈ f`. -/
def join (f : filter (filter α)) : filter α :=
{ sets := {s | {t : filter α | s ∈ t.sets} ∈ f.sets},
univ_sets := by simp only [univ_mem_sets, mem_set_of_eq]; exact univ_mem_sets,
sets_of_superset := assume x y hx xy,
mem_sets_of_superset hx $ assume f h, mem_sets_of_superset h xy,
inter_sets := assume x y hx hy,
mem_sets_of_superset (inter_mem_sets hx hy) $ assume f ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, inter_mem_sets h₁ h₂ }
@[simp] lemma mem_join_sets {s : set α} {f : filter (filter α)} :
s ∈ (join f).sets ↔ {t | s ∈ filter.sets t} ∈ f.sets := iff.rfl
end join
section lattice
instance : partial_order (filter α) :=
{ le := λf g, g.sets ⊆ f.sets,
le_antisymm := assume a b h₁ h₂, filter_eq $ subset.antisymm h₂ h₁,
le_refl := assume a, subset.refl _,
le_trans := assume a b c h₁ h₂, subset.trans h₂ h₁ }
theorem le_def {f g : filter α} : f ≤ g ↔ ∀ x ∈ g.sets, x ∈ f.sets := iff.rfl
/-- `generate_sets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive generate_sets (g : set (set α)) : set α → Prop
| basic {s : set α} : s ∈ g → generate_sets s
| univ {} : generate_sets univ
| superset {s t : set α} : generate_sets s → s ⊆ t → generate_sets t
| inter {s t : set α} : generate_sets s → generate_sets t → generate_sets (s ∩ t)
/-- `generate g` is the smallest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : set (set α)) : filter α :=
{ sets := {s | generate_sets g s},
univ_sets := generate_sets.univ,
sets_of_superset := assume x y, generate_sets.superset,
inter_sets := assume s t, generate_sets.inter }
lemma sets_iff_generate {s : set (set α)} {f : filter α} : f ≤ filter.generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
iff.intro
(assume h u hu, h $ generate_sets.basic $ hu)
(assume h u hu, hu.rec_on h univ_mem_sets
(assume x y _ hxy hx, mem_sets_of_superset hx hxy)
(assume x y _ _ hx hy, inter_mem_sets hx hy))
protected def mk_of_closure (s : set (set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : filter α :=
{ sets := s,
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem_sets,
sets_of_superset := assume x y, hs ▸ mem_sets_of_superset,
inter_sets := assume x y, hs ▸ inter_mem_sets }
lemma mk_of_closure_sets {s : set (set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
filter.mk_of_closure s hs = generate s :=
filter.ext $ assume u, hs.symm ▸ iff.refl _
/- Galois insertion from sets of sets into a filters. -/
def gi_generate (α : Type*) :
@galois_insertion (set (set α)) (order_dual (filter α)) _ _ filter.generate filter.sets :=
{ gc := assume s f, sets_iff_generate,
le_l_u := assume f u, generate_sets.basic,
choice := λs hs, filter.mk_of_closure s (le_antisymm hs $ sets_iff_generate.1 $ le_refl _),
choice_eq := assume s hs, mk_of_closure_sets }
/-- The infimum of filters is the filter generated by intersections
of elements of the two filters. -/
instance : has_inf (filter α) := ⟨λf g : filter α,
{ sets := {s | ∃ (a ∈ f.sets) (b ∈ g.sets), a ∩ b ⊆ s },
univ_sets := ⟨_, univ_mem_sets, _, univ_mem_sets, inter_subset_left _ _⟩,
sets_of_superset := assume x y ⟨a, ha, b, hb, h⟩ xy, ⟨a, ha, b, hb, subset.trans h xy⟩,
inter_sets := assume x y ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hx⟩ ⟨c, hc, d, hd, hy⟩,
⟨_, inter_mem_sets ha hc, _, inter_mem_sets hb hd,
calc a ∩ c ∩ (b ∩ d) = (a ∩ b) ∩ (c ∩ d) : by ac_refl
... ⊆ x ∩ y : inter_subset_inter hx hy⟩ }⟩
@[simp] lemma mem_inf_sets {f g : filter α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ (f ⊓ g).sets ↔ ∃t₁∈f.sets, ∃t₂∈g.sets, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s := iff.rfl
lemma mem_inf_sets_of_left {f g : filter α} {s : set α} (h : s ∈ f.sets) : s ∈ (f ⊓ g).sets :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem_sets, inter_subset_left _ _⟩
lemma mem_inf_sets_of_right {f g : filter α} {s : set α} (h : s ∈ g.sets) : s ∈ (f ⊓ g).sets :=
⟨univ, univ_mem_sets, s, h, inter_subset_right _ _⟩
lemma inter_mem_inf_sets {α : Type u} {f g : filter α} {s t : set α}
(hs : s ∈ f.sets) (ht : t ∈ g.sets) : s ∩ t ∈ (f ⊓ g).sets :=
inter_mem_sets (mem_inf_sets_of_left hs) (mem_inf_sets_of_right ht)
instance : has_top (filter α) :=
⟨{ sets := {s | ∀x, x ∈ s},
univ_sets := assume x, mem_univ x,
sets_of_superset := assume x y hx hxy a, hxy (hx a),
inter_sets := assume x y hx hy a, mem_inter (hx _) (hy _) }⟩
lemma mem_top_sets_iff_forall {s : set α} : s ∈ (⊤ : filter α).sets ↔ (∀x, x ∈ s) :=
iff.refl _
@[simp] lemma mem_top_sets {s : set α} : s ∈ (⊤ : filter α).sets ↔ s = univ :=
by rw [mem_top_sets_iff_forall, eq_univ_iff_forall]
section complete_lattice
/- We lift the complete lattice along the Galois connection `generate` / `sets`. Unfortunately,
we want to have different definitional equalities for the lattice operations. So we define them
upfront and change the lattice operations for the complete lattice instance. -/
private def original_complete_lattice : complete_lattice (filter α) :=
@order_dual.lattice.complete_lattice _ (gi_generate α).lift_complete_lattice
local attribute [instance] original_complete_lattice
instance : complete_lattice (filter α) := original_complete_lattice.copy
/- le -/ filter.partial_order.le rfl
/- top -/ (filter.lattice.has_top).1
(top_unique $ assume s hs, (eq_univ_of_forall hs).symm ▸ univ_mem_sets)
/- bot -/ _ rfl
/- sup -/ _ rfl
/- inf -/ (filter.lattice.has_inf).1
begin
ext f g : 2,
exact le_antisymm
(le_inf (assume s, mem_inf_sets_of_left) (assume s, mem_inf_sets_of_right))
(assume s ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hs⟩, mem_sets_of_superset (inter_mem_sets
(@inf_le_left (filter α) _ _ _ _ ha)
(@inf_le_right (filter α) _ _ _ _ hb)) hs)
end
/- Sup -/ (join ∘ principal) (by ext s x; exact (@mem_bInter_iff _ _ s filter.sets x).symm)
/- Inf -/ _ rfl
end complete_lattice
lemma bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : filter α).sets = univ := rfl
lemma sup_sets_eq {f g : filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(gi_generate α).gc.u_inf
lemma Sup_sets_eq {s : set (filter α)} : (Sup s).sets = (⋂f∈s, (f:filter α).sets) :=
(gi_generate α).gc.u_Inf
lemma supr_sets_eq {f : ι → filter α} : (supr f).sets = (⋂i, (f i).sets) :=
(gi_generate α).gc.u_infi
lemma generate_empty : filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : filter α) :=
(gi_generate α).gc.l_bot
lemma generate_univ : filter.generate univ = (⊥ : filter α) :=
mk_of_closure_sets.symm
lemma generate_union {s t : set (set α)} :
filter.generate (s ∪ t) = filter.generate s ⊓ filter.generate t :=
(gi_generate α).gc.l_sup
lemma generate_Union {s : ι → set (set α)} :
filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = (⨅ i, filter.generate (s i)) :=
(gi_generate α).gc.l_supr
@[simp] lemma mem_bot_sets {s : set α} : s ∈ (⊥ : filter α).sets :=
trivial
@[simp] lemma mem_sup_sets {f g : filter α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ (f ⊔ g).sets ↔ s ∈ f.sets ∧ s ∈ g.sets :=
iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_Sup_sets {x : set α} {s : set (filter α)} :
x ∈ (Sup s).sets ↔ (∀f∈s, x ∈ (f:filter α).sets) :=
iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_supr_sets {x : set α} {f : ι → filter α} :
x ∈ (supr f).sets ↔ (∀i, x ∈ (f i).sets) :=
by simp only [supr_sets_eq, iff_self, mem_Inter]
@[simp] lemma le_principal_iff {s : set α} {f : filter α} : f ≤ principal s ↔ s ∈ f.sets :=
show (∀{t}, s ⊆ t → t ∈ f.sets) ↔ s ∈ f.sets,
from ⟨assume h, h (subset.refl s), assume hs t ht, mem_sets_of_superset hs ht⟩
lemma principal_mono {s t : set α} : principal s ≤ principal t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
by simp only [le_principal_iff, iff_self, mem_principal_sets]
lemma monotone_principal : monotone (principal : set α → filter α) :=
by simp only [monotone, principal_mono]; exact assume a b h, h
@[simp] lemma principal_eq_iff_eq {s t : set α} : principal s = principal t ↔ s = t :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_principal_sets]; refl
@[simp] lemma join_principal_eq_Sup {s : set (filter α)} : join (principal s) = Sup s := rfl
/- lattice equations -/
lemma empty_in_sets_eq_bot {f : filter α} : ∅ ∈ f.sets ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨assume h, bot_unique $ assume s _, mem_sets_of_superset h (empty_subset s),
assume : f = ⊥, this.symm ▸ mem_bot_sets⟩
lemma inhabited_of_mem_sets {f : filter α} {s : set α} (hf : f ≠ ⊥) (hs : s ∈ f.sets) :
∃x, x ∈ s :=
have ∅ ∉ f.sets, from assume h, hf $ empty_in_sets_eq_bot.mp h,
have s ≠ ∅, from assume h, this (h ▸ hs),
exists_mem_of_ne_empty this
lemma filter_eq_bot_of_not_nonempty {f : filter α} (ne : ¬ nonempty α) : f = ⊥ :=
empty_in_sets_eq_bot.mp $ univ_mem_sets' $ assume x, false.elim (ne ⟨x⟩)
lemma forall_sets_neq_empty_iff_neq_bot {f : filter α} :
(∀ (s : set α), s ∈ f.sets → s ≠ ∅) ↔ f ≠ ⊥ :=
by
simp only [(@empty_in_sets_eq_bot α f).symm, ne.def];
exact ⟨assume h hs, h _ hs rfl, assume h s hs eq, h $ eq ▸ hs⟩
lemma mem_sets_of_neq_bot {f : filter α} {s : set α} (h : f ⊓ principal (-s) = ⊥) : s ∈ f.sets :=
have ∅ ∈ (f ⊓ principal (- s)).sets, from h.symm ▸ mem_bot_sets,
let ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, (hs₂ : -s ⊆ s₂), (hs : s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ ∅)⟩ := this in
by filter_upwards [hs₁] assume a ha, classical.by_contradiction $ assume ha', hs ⟨ha, hs₂ ha'⟩
lemma infi_sets_eq {f : ι → filter α} (h : directed (≥) f) (ne : nonempty ι) :
(infi f).sets = (⋃ i, (f i).sets) :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ne, u := { filter .
sets := (⋃ i, (f i).sets),
univ_sets := by simp only [mem_Union]; exact ⟨i, univ_mem_sets⟩,
sets_of_superset := by simp only [mem_Union, exists_imp_distrib];
intros x y i hx hxy; exact ⟨i, mem_sets_of_superset hx hxy⟩,
inter_sets :=
begin
simp only [mem_Union, exists_imp_distrib],
assume x y a hx b hy,
rcases h a b with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩,
exact ⟨c, inter_mem_sets (ha hx) (hb hy)⟩
end } in
subset.antisymm
(show u ≤ infi f, from le_infi $ assume i, le_supr (λi, (f i).sets) i)
(Union_subset $ assume i, infi_le f i)
lemma infi_sets_eq' {f : β → filter α} {s : set β}
(h : directed_on (f ⁻¹'o (≥)) s) (ne : ∃i, i ∈ s) :
(⨅ i∈s, f i).sets = (⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).sets) :=
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := ne in
calc (⨅ i ∈ s, f i).sets = (⨅ t : {t // t ∈ s}, (f t.val)).sets : by rw [infi_subtype]; refl
... = (⨆ t : {t // t ∈ s}, (f t.val).sets) : infi_sets_eq
(assume ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩, match h x hx y hy with ⟨z, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := ⟨⟨z, h₁⟩, h₂, h₃⟩ end)
⟨⟨i, hi⟩⟩
... = (⨆ t ∈ {t | t ∈ s}, (f t).sets) : by rw [supr_subtype]; refl
lemma infi_sets_eq_finite (f : ι → filter α) :
(⨅i, f i).sets = (⋃t:finset (plift ι), (⨅i∈t, f (plift.down i)).sets) :=
begin
rw [infi_eq_infi_finset, infi_sets_eq],
exact (directed_of_sup $ λs₁ s₂ hs, infi_le_infi $ λi, infi_le_infi_const $ λh, hs h),
apply_instance
end
@[simp] lemma sup_join {f₁ f₂ : filter (filter α)} : (join f₁ ⊔ join f₂) = join (f₁ ⊔ f₂) :=
filter_eq $ set.ext $ assume x,
by simp only [supr_sets_eq, join, mem_sup_sets, iff_self, mem_set_of_eq]
@[simp] lemma supr_join {ι : Sort w} {f : ι → filter (filter α)} :
(⨆x, join (f x)) = join (⨆x, f x) :=
filter_eq $ set.ext $ assume x,
by simp only [supr_sets_eq, join, iff_self, mem_Inter, mem_set_of_eq]
instance : bounded_distrib_lattice (filter α) :=
{ le_sup_inf :=
begin
assume x y z s,
simp only [and_assoc, mem_inf_sets, mem_sup_sets, exists_prop, exists_imp_distrib, and_imp],
intros hs t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ hts,
exact ⟨s ∪ t₁,
x.sets_of_superset hs $ subset_union_left _ _,
y.sets_of_superset ht₁ $ subset_union_right _ _,
s ∪ t₂,
x.sets_of_superset hs $ subset_union_left _ _,
z.sets_of_superset ht₂ $ subset_union_right _ _,
subset.trans (@le_sup_inf (set α) _ _ _ _) (union_subset (subset.refl _) hts)⟩
end,
..filter.lattice.complete_lattice }
/- the complementary version with ⨆i, f ⊓ g i does not hold! -/
lemma infi_sup_eq {f : filter α} {g : ι → filter α} : (⨅ x, f ⊔ g x) = f ⊔ infi g :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (le_infi $ assume i, sup_le_sup (le_refl f) $ infi_le _ _),
rintros t ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
rw [infi_sets_eq_finite] at h₂,
simp only [mem_Union, (finset.inf_eq_infi _ _).symm] at h₂,
rcases h₂ with ⟨s, hs⟩,
suffices : (⨅i, f ⊔ g i) ≤ f ⊔ s.inf (λi, g i.down), { exact this ⟨h₁, hs⟩ },
refine finset.induction_on s _ _,
{ exact le_sup_right_of_le le_top },
{ rintros ⟨i⟩ s his ih,
rw [finset.inf_insert, sup_inf_left],
exact le_inf (infi_le _ _) ih }
end
lemma mem_infi_sets_finset {s : finset α} {f : α → filter β} :
∀t, t ∈ (⨅a∈s, f a).sets ↔ (∃p:α → set β, (∀a∈s, p a ∈ (f a).sets) ∧ (⋂a∈s, p a) ⊆ t) :=
show ∀t, t ∈ (⨅a∈s, f a).sets ↔ (∃p:α → set β, (∀a∈s, p a ∈ (f a).sets) ∧ (⨅a∈s, p a) ≤ t),
begin
simp only [(finset.inf_eq_infi _ _).symm],
refine finset.induction_on s _ _,
{ simp only [finset.not_mem_empty, false_implies_iff, finset.inf_empty, top_le_iff,
imp_true_iff, mem_top_sets, true_and, exists_const],
intros; refl },
{ intros a s has ih t,
simp only [ih, finset.forall_mem_insert, finset.inf_insert, mem_inf_sets,
exists_prop, iff_iff_implies_and_implies, exists_imp_distrib, and_imp, and_assoc] {contextual := tt},
split,
{ intros t₁ ht₁ t₂ p hp ht₂ ht,
existsi function.update p a t₁,
have : ∀a'∈s, function.update p a t₁ a' = p a',
from assume a' ha',
have a' ≠ a, from assume h, has $ h ▸ ha',
function.update_noteq this,
have eq : s.inf (λj, function.update p a t₁ j) = s.inf (λj, p j) :=
finset.inf_congr rfl this,
simp only [this, ht₁, hp, function.update_same, true_and, imp_true_iff, eq] {contextual := tt},
exact subset.trans (inter_subset_inter (subset.refl _) ht₂) ht },
assume p hpa hp ht,
exact ⟨p a, hpa, (s.inf p), ⟨⟨p, hp, le_refl _⟩, ht⟩⟩ }
end
/- principal equations -/
@[simp] lemma inf_principal {s t : set α} : principal s ⊓ principal t = principal (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(by simp; exact ⟨s, subset.refl s, t, subset.refl t, by simp⟩)
(by simp [le_inf_iff, inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right])
@[simp] lemma sup_principal {s t : set α} : principal s ⊔ principal t = principal (s ∪ t) :=
filter_eq $ set.ext $
by simp only [union_subset_iff, union_subset_iff, mem_sup_sets, forall_const, iff_self, mem_principal_sets]
@[simp] lemma supr_principal {ι : Sort w} {s : ι → set α} : (⨆x, principal (s x)) = principal (⋃i, s i) :=
filter_eq $ set.ext $ assume x, by simp only [supr_sets_eq, mem_principal_sets, mem_Inter];
exact (@supr_le_iff (set α) _ _ _ _).symm
lemma principal_univ : principal (univ : set α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique $ by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_top_sets, eq_self_iff_true]
lemma principal_empty : principal (∅ : set α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique $ assume s _, empty_subset _
@[simp] lemma principal_eq_bot_iff {s : set α} : principal s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ :=
⟨assume h, principal_eq_iff_eq.mp $ by simp only [principal_empty, h, eq_self_iff_true],
assume h, by simp only [h, principal_empty, eq_self_iff_true]⟩
lemma inf_principal_eq_bot {f : filter α} {s : set α} (hs : -s ∈ f.sets) : f ⊓ principal s = ⊥ :=
empty_in_sets_eq_bot.mp ⟨_, hs, s, mem_principal_self s, assume x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₁ h₂⟩
theorem mem_inf_principal (f : filter α) (s t : set α) :
s ∈ (f ⊓ principal t).sets ↔ { x | x ∈ t → x ∈ s } ∈ f.sets :=
begin
simp only [mem_inf_sets, mem_principal_sets, exists_prop], split,
{ rintros ⟨u, ul, v, tsubv, uvinter⟩,
apply filter.mem_sets_of_superset ul,
intros x xu xt, exact uvinter ⟨xu, tsubv xt⟩ },
intro h, refine ⟨_, h, t, set.subset.refl t, _⟩,
rintros x ⟨hx, xt⟩,
exact hx xt
end
end lattice
section map
/-- The forward map of a filter -/
def map (m : α → β) (f : filter α) : filter β :=
{ sets := preimage m ⁻¹' f.sets,
univ_sets := univ_mem_sets,
sets_of_superset := assume s t hs st, mem_sets_of_superset hs $ preimage_mono st,
inter_sets := assume s t hs ht, inter_mem_sets hs ht }
@[simp] lemma map_principal {s : set α} {f : α → β} :
map f (principal s) = principal (set.image f s) :=
filter_eq $ set.ext $ assume a, image_subset_iff.symm
variables {f : filter α} {m : α → β} {m' : β → γ} {s : set α} {t : set β}
@[simp] lemma mem_map : t ∈ (map m f).sets ↔ {x | m x ∈ t} ∈ f.sets := iff.rfl
lemma image_mem_map (hs : s ∈ f.sets) : m '' s ∈ (map m f).sets :=
f.sets_of_superset hs $ subset_preimage_image m s
lemma range_mem_map : range m ∈ (map m f).sets :=
by rw ←image_univ; exact image_mem_map univ_mem_sets
lemma mem_map_sets_iff : t ∈ (map m f).sets ↔ (∃s∈f.sets, m '' s ⊆ t) :=
iff.intro
(assume ht, ⟨set.preimage m t, ht, image_preimage_subset _ _⟩)
(assume ⟨s, hs, ht⟩, mem_sets_of_superset (image_mem_map hs) ht)
@[simp] lemma map_id : filter.map id f = f :=
filter_eq $ rfl
@[simp] lemma map_compose : filter.map m' ∘ filter.map m = filter.map (m' ∘ m) :=
funext $ assume _, filter_eq $ rfl
@[simp] lemma map_map : filter.map m' (filter.map m f) = filter.map (m' ∘ m) f :=
congr_fun (@@filter.map_compose m m') f
end map
section comap
/-- The inverse map of a filter -/
def comap (m : α → β) (f : filter β) : filter α :=
{ sets := { s | ∃t∈f.sets, m ⁻¹' t ⊆ s },
univ_sets := ⟨univ, univ_mem_sets, by simp only [subset_univ, preimage_univ]⟩,
sets_of_superset := assume a b ⟨a', ha', ma'a⟩ ab,
⟨a', ha', subset.trans ma'a ab⟩,
inter_sets := assume a b ⟨a', ha₁, ha₂⟩ ⟨b', hb₁, hb₂⟩,
⟨a' ∩ b', inter_mem_sets ha₁ hb₁, inter_subset_inter ha₂ hb₂⟩ }
end comap
/-- The cofinite filter is the filter of subsets whose complements are finite. -/
def cofinite : filter α :=
{ sets := {s | finite (- s)},
univ_sets := by simp only [compl_univ, finite_empty, mem_set_of_eq],
sets_of_superset := assume s t (hs : finite (-s)) (st: s ⊆ t),
finite_subset hs $ @lattice.neg_le_neg (set α) _ _ _ st,
inter_sets := assume s t (hs : finite (-s)) (ht : finite (-t)),
by simp only [compl_inter, finite_union, ht, hs, mem_set_of_eq] }
/-- The monadic bind operation on filter is defined the usual way in terms of `map` and `join`.
Unfortunately, this `bind` does not result in the expected applicative. See `filter.seq` for the
applicative instance. -/
def bind (f : filter α) (m : α → filter β) : filter β := join (map m f)
/-- The applicative sequentiation operation. This is not induced by the bind operation. -/
def seq (f : filter (α → β)) (g : filter α) : filter β :=
⟨{ s | ∃u∈f.sets, ∃t∈g.sets, (∀m∈u, ∀x∈t, (m : α → β) x ∈ s) },
⟨univ, univ_mem_sets, univ, univ_mem_sets, by simp only [forall_prop_of_true, mem_univ, forall_true_iff]⟩,
assume s₀ s₁ ⟨t₀, t₁, h₀, h₁, h⟩ hst, ⟨t₀, t₁, h₀, h₁, assume x hx y hy, hst $ h _ hx _ hy⟩,
assume s₀ s₁ ⟨t₀, ht₀, t₁, ht₁, ht⟩ ⟨u₀, hu₀, u₁, hu₁, hu⟩,
⟨t₀ ∩ u₀, inter_mem_sets ht₀ hu₀, t₁ ∩ u₁, inter_mem_sets ht₁ hu₁,
assume x ⟨hx₀, hx₁⟩ x ⟨hy₀, hy₁⟩, ⟨ht _ hx₀ _ hy₀, hu _ hx₁ _ hy₁⟩⟩⟩
instance : has_pure filter := ⟨λ(α : Type u) x, principal {x}⟩
instance : has_bind filter := ⟨@filter.bind⟩
instance : has_seq filter := ⟨@filter.seq⟩
instance : functor filter := { map := @filter.map }
section
-- this section needs to be before applicative, otherwise the wrong instance will be chosen
protected def monad : monad filter := { map := @filter.map }
local attribute [instance] filter.monad
protected def is_lawful_monad : is_lawful_monad filter :=
{ id_map := assume α f, filter_eq rfl,
pure_bind := assume α β a f, by simp only [bind, Sup_image, image_singleton,
join_principal_eq_Sup, lattice.Sup_singleton, map_principal, eq_self_iff_true],
bind_assoc := assume α β γ f m₁ m₂, filter_eq rfl,
bind_pure_comp_eq_map := assume α β f x, filter_eq $
by simp only [bind, join, map, preimage, principal, set.subset_univ, eq_self_iff_true,
function.comp_app, mem_set_of_eq, singleton_subset_iff] }
end
instance : applicative filter := { map := @filter.map, seq := @filter.seq }
instance : alternative filter :=
{ failure := λα, ⊥,
orelse := λα x y, x ⊔ y }
@[simp] lemma pure_def (x : α) : pure x = principal {x} := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_pure {a : α} {s : set α} : a ∈ s → s ∈ (pure a : filter α).sets :=
by simp only [imp_self, pure_def, mem_principal_sets, singleton_subset_iff]; exact id
@[simp] lemma mem_pure_iff {a : α} {s : set α} : s ∈ (pure a : filter α).sets ↔ a ∈ s :=
by rw [pure_def, mem_principal_sets, set.singleton_subset_iff]
@[simp] lemma map_def {α β} (m : α → β) (f : filter α) : m <$> f = map m f := rfl
@[simp] lemma bind_def {α β} (f : filter α) (m : α → filter β) : f >>= m = bind f m := rfl
/- map and comap equations -/
section map
variables {f f₁ f₂ : filter α} {g g₁ g₂ : filter β} {m : α → β} {m' : β → γ} {s : set α} {t : set β}
@[simp] theorem mem_comap_sets : s ∈ (comap m g).sets ↔ ∃t∈g.sets, m ⁻¹' t ⊆ s := iff.rfl
theorem preimage_mem_comap (ht : t ∈ g.sets) : m ⁻¹' t ∈ (comap m g).sets :=
⟨t, ht, subset.refl _⟩
lemma comap_id : comap id f = f :=
le_antisymm (assume s, preimage_mem_comap) (assume s ⟨t, ht, hst⟩, mem_sets_of_superset ht hst)
lemma comap_comap_comp {m : γ → β} {n : β → α} : comap m (comap n f) = comap (n ∘ m) f :=
le_antisymm
(assume c ⟨b, hb, (h : preimage (n ∘ m) b ⊆ c)⟩, ⟨preimage n b, preimage_mem_comap hb, h⟩)
(assume c ⟨b, ⟨a, ha, (h₁ : preimage n a ⊆ b)⟩, (h₂ : preimage m b ⊆ c)⟩,
⟨a, ha, show preimage m (preimage n a) ⊆ c, from subset.trans (preimage_mono h₁) h₂⟩)
@[simp] theorem comap_principal {t : set β} : comap m (principal t) = principal (m ⁻¹' t) :=
filter_eq $ set.ext $ assume s,
⟨assume ⟨u, (hu : t ⊆ u), (b : preimage m u ⊆ s)⟩, subset.trans (preimage_mono hu) b,
assume : preimage m t ⊆ s, ⟨t, subset.refl t, this⟩⟩
lemma map_le_iff_le_comap : map m f ≤ g ↔ f ≤ comap m g :=
⟨assume h s ⟨t, ht, hts⟩, mem_sets_of_superset (h ht) hts, assume h s ht, h ⟨_, ht, subset.refl _⟩⟩
lemma gc_map_comap (m : α → β) : galois_connection (map m) (comap m) :=
assume f g, map_le_iff_le_comap
lemma map_mono (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : map m f₁ ≤ map m f₂ := (gc_map_comap m).monotone_l h
lemma monotone_map : monotone (map m) | a b := map_mono
lemma comap_mono (h : g₁ ≤ g₂) : comap m g₁ ≤ comap m g₂ := (gc_map_comap m).monotone_u h
lemma monotone_comap : monotone (comap m) | a b := comap_mono
@[simp] lemma map_bot : map m ⊥ = ⊥ := (gc_map_comap m).l_bot
@[simp] lemma map_sup : map m (f₁ ⊔ f₂) = map m f₁ ⊔ map m f₂ := (gc_map_comap m).l_sup
@[simp] lemma map_supr {f : ι → filter α} : map m (⨆i, f i) = (⨆i, map m (f i)) :=
(gc_map_comap m).l_supr
@[simp] lemma comap_top : comap m ⊤ = ⊤ := (gc_map_comap m).u_top
@[simp] lemma comap_inf : comap m (g₁ ⊓ g₂) = comap m g₁ ⊓ comap m g₂ := (gc_map_comap m).u_inf
@[simp] lemma comap_infi {f : ι → filter β} : comap m (⨅i, f i) = (⨅i, comap m (f i)) :=
(gc_map_comap m).u_infi
lemma map_comap_le : map m (comap m g) ≤ g := (gc_map_comap m).l_u_le _
lemma le_comap_map : f ≤ comap m (map m f) := (gc_map_comap m).le_u_l _
@[simp] lemma comap_bot : comap m ⊥ = ⊥ :=
bot_unique $ assume s _, ⟨∅, by simp only [mem_bot_sets], by simp only [empty_subset, preimage_empty]⟩
lemma comap_supr {ι} {f : ι → filter β} {m : α → β} :
comap m (supr f) = (⨆i, comap m (f i)) :=
le_antisymm
(assume s hs,
have ∀i, ∃t, t ∈ (f i).sets ∧ m ⁻¹' t ⊆ s, by simpa only [mem_comap_sets, exists_prop, mem_supr_sets] using mem_supr_sets.1 hs,
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := classical.axiom_of_choice this in
⟨⋃i, t i, mem_supr_sets.2 $ assume i, (f i).sets_of_superset (ht i).1 (subset_Union _ _),
begin
rw [preimage_Union, Union_subset_iff],
assume i,
exact (ht i).2
end⟩)
(supr_le $ assume i, monotone_comap $ le_supr _ _)
lemma comap_Sup {s : set (filter β)} {m : α → β} : comap m (Sup s) = (⨆f∈s, comap m f) :=
by simp only [Sup_eq_supr, comap_supr, eq_self_iff_true]
lemma comap_sup : comap m (g₁ ⊔ g₂) = comap m g₁ ⊔ comap m g₂ :=
le_antisymm
(assume s ⟨⟨t₁, ht₁, hs₁⟩, ⟨t₂, ht₂, hs₂⟩⟩,
⟨t₁ ∪ t₂,
⟨g₁.sets_of_superset ht₁ (subset_union_left _ _), g₂.sets_of_superset ht₂ (subset_union_right _ _)⟩,
union_subset hs₁ hs₂⟩)
(sup_le (comap_mono le_sup_left) (comap_mono le_sup_right))
lemma map_comap {f : filter β} {m : α → β} (hf : range m ∈ f.sets) : (f.comap m).map m = f :=
le_antisymm
map_comap_le
(assume t' ⟨t, ht, sub⟩, by filter_upwards [ht, hf]; rintros x hxt ⟨y, rfl⟩; exact sub hxt)
lemma comap_map {f : filter α} {m : α → β} (h : ∀ x y, m x = m y → x = y) :
comap m (map m f) = f :=
have ∀s, preimage m (image m s) = s,
from assume s, preimage_image_eq s h,
le_antisymm
(assume s hs, ⟨
image m s,
f.sets_of_superset hs $ by simp only [this, subset.refl],
by simp only [this, subset.refl]⟩)
le_comap_map
lemma le_of_map_le_map_inj' {f g : filter α} {m : α → β} {s : set α}
(hsf : s ∈ f.sets) (hsg : s ∈ g.sets) (hm : ∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, m x = m y → x = y)
(h : map m f ≤ map m g) : f ≤ g :=
assume t ht, by filter_upwards [hsf, h $ image_mem_map (inter_mem_sets hsg ht)]
assume a has ⟨b, ⟨hbs, hb⟩, h⟩,
have b = a, from hm _ hbs _ has h,
this ▸ hb
lemma le_of_map_le_map_inj_iff {f g : filter α} {m : α → β} {s : set α}
(hsf : s ∈ f.sets) (hsg : s ∈ g.sets) (hm : ∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, m x = m y → x = y) :
map m f ≤ map m g ↔ f ≤ g :=
iff.intro (le_of_map_le_map_inj' hsf hsg hm) map_mono
lemma eq_of_map_eq_map_inj' {f g : filter α} {m : α → β} {s : set α}
(hsf : s ∈ f.sets) (hsg : s ∈ g.sets) (hm : ∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, m x = m y → x = y)
(h : map m f = map m g) : f = g :=
le_antisymm
(le_of_map_le_map_inj' hsf hsg hm $ le_of_eq h)
(le_of_map_le_map_inj' hsg hsf hm $ le_of_eq h.symm)
lemma map_inj {f g : filter α} {m : α → β} (hm : ∀ x y, m x = m y → x = y) (h : map m f = map m g) :
f = g :=
have comap m (map m f) = comap m (map m g), by rw h,
by rwa [comap_map hm, comap_map hm] at this
theorem le_map_comap_of_surjective' {f : α → β} {l : filter β} {u : set β} (ul : u ∈ l.sets)
(hf : ∀ y ∈ u, ∃ x, f x = y) :
l ≤ map f (comap f l) :=
assume s ⟨t, tl, ht⟩,
have t ∩ u ⊆ s, from
assume x ⟨xt, xu⟩,
exists.elim (hf x xu) $ λ a faeq,
by { rw ←faeq, apply ht, change f a ∈ t, rw faeq, exact xt },
mem_sets_of_superset (inter_mem_sets tl ul) this
theorem map_comap_of_surjective' {f : α → β} {l : filter β} {u : set β} (ul : u ∈ l.sets)
(hf : ∀ y ∈ u, ∃ x, f x = y) :
map f (comap f l) = l :=
le_antisymm map_comap_le (le_map_comap_of_surjective' ul hf)
theorem le_map_comap_of_surjective {f : α → β} (hf : function.surjective f) (l : filter β) :
l ≤ map f (comap f l) :=
le_map_comap_of_surjective' univ_mem_sets (λ y _, hf y)
theorem map_comap_of_surjective {f : α → β} (hf : function.surjective f) (l : filter β) :
map f (comap f l) = l :=
le_antisymm map_comap_le (le_map_comap_of_surjective hf l)
lemma comap_neq_bot {f : filter β} {m : α → β}
(hm : ∀t∈f.sets, ∃a, m a ∈ t) : comap m f ≠ ⊥ :=
forall_sets_neq_empty_iff_neq_bot.mp $ assume s ⟨t, ht, t_s⟩,
let ⟨a, (ha : a ∈ preimage m t)⟩ := hm t ht in
neq_bot_of_le_neq_bot (ne_empty_of_mem ha) t_s
lemma comap_neq_bot_of_surj {f : filter β} {m : α → β}
(hf : f ≠ ⊥) (hm : ∀b, ∃a, m a = b) : comap m f ≠ ⊥ :=
comap_neq_bot $ assume t ht,
let
⟨b, (hx : b ∈ t)⟩ := inhabited_of_mem_sets hf ht,
⟨a, (ha : m a = b)⟩ := hm b
in ⟨a, ha.symm ▸ hx⟩
@[simp] lemma map_eq_bot_iff : map m f = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨by rw [←empty_in_sets_eq_bot, ←empty_in_sets_eq_bot]; exact id,
assume h, by simp only [h, eq_self_iff_true, map_bot]⟩
lemma map_ne_bot (hf : f ≠ ⊥) : map m f ≠ ⊥ :=
assume h, hf $ by rwa [map_eq_bot_iff] at h
lemma sInter_comap_sets (f : α → β) (F : filter β) :
⋂₀(comap f F).sets = ⋂ U ∈ F.sets, f ⁻¹' U :=
begin
ext x,
suffices : (∀ (A : set α) (B : set β), B ∈ F.sets → f ⁻¹' B ⊆ A → x ∈ A) ↔
∀ (B : set β), B ∈ F.sets → f x ∈ B,
by simp only [mem_sInter, mem_Inter, mem_comap_sets, this, and_imp, mem_comap_sets, exists_prop, mem_sInter,
iff_self, mem_Inter, mem_preimage_eq, exists_imp_distrib],
split,
{ intros h U U_in,
simpa only [set.subset.refl, forall_prop_of_true, mem_preimage_eq] using h (f ⁻¹' U) U U_in },
{ intros h V U U_in f_U_V,
exact f_U_V (h U U_in) },
end
end map
lemma map_cong {m₁ m₂ : α → β} {f : filter α} (h : {x | m₁ x = m₂ x} ∈ f.sets) :
map m₁ f = map m₂ f :=
have ∀(m₁ m₂ : α → β) (h : {x | m₁ x = m₂ x} ∈ f.sets), map m₁ f ≤ map m₂ f,
begin
intros m₁ m₂ h s hs,
show {x | m₁ x ∈ s} ∈ f.sets,
filter_upwards [h, hs],
simp only [subset_def, mem_preimage_eq, mem_set_of_eq, forall_true_iff] {contextual := tt}
end,
le_antisymm (this m₁ m₂ h) (this m₂ m₁ $ mem_sets_of_superset h $ assume x, eq.symm)
-- this is a generic rule for monotone functions:
lemma map_infi_le {f : ι → filter α} {m : α → β} :
map m (infi f) ≤ (⨅ i, map m (f i)) :=
le_infi $ assume i, map_mono $ infi_le _ _
lemma map_infi_eq {f : ι → filter α} {m : α → β} (hf : directed (≥) f) (hι : nonempty ι) :
map m (infi f) = (⨅ i, map m (f i)) :=
le_antisymm
map_infi_le
(assume s (hs : preimage m s ∈ (infi f).sets),
have ∃i, preimage m s ∈ (f i).sets,
by simp only [infi_sets_eq hf hι, mem_Union] at hs; assumption,
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := this in
have (⨅ i, map m (f i)) ≤ principal s, from
infi_le_of_le i $ by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_map]; assumption,
by simp only [filter.le_principal_iff] at this; assumption)
lemma map_binfi_eq {ι : Type w} {f : ι → filter α} {m : α → β} {p : ι → Prop}
(h : directed_on (f ⁻¹'o (≥)) {x | p x}) (ne : ∃i, p i) :
map m (⨅i (h : p i), f i) = (⨅i (h: p i), map m (f i)) :=
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := ne in
calc map m (⨅i (h : p i), f i) = map m (⨅i:subtype p, f i.val) : by simp only [infi_subtype, eq_self_iff_true]
... = (⨅i:subtype p, map m (f i.val)) : map_infi_eq
(assume ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩, match h x hx y hy with ⟨z, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := ⟨⟨z, h₁⟩, h₂, h₃⟩ end)
⟨⟨i, hi⟩⟩
... = (⨅i (h : p i), map m (f i)) : by simp only [infi_subtype, eq_self_iff_true]
lemma map_inf' {f g : filter α} {m : α → β} {t : set α} (htf : t ∈ f.sets) (htg : t ∈ g.sets)
(h : ∀x∈t, ∀y∈t, m x = m y → x = y) : map m (f ⊓ g) = map m f ⊓ map m g :=
begin
refine le_antisymm
(le_inf (map_mono inf_le_left) (map_mono inf_le_right))
(assume s hs, _),
simp only [map, mem_inf_sets, exists_prop, mem_map, mem_preimage_eq, mem_inf_sets] at hs ⊢,
rcases hs with ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, hs⟩,
refine ⟨m '' (t₁ ∩ t), _, m '' (t₂ ∩ t), _, _⟩,
{ filter_upwards [h₁, htf] assume a h₁ h₂, mem_image_of_mem _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ },
{ filter_upwards [h₂, htg] assume a h₁ h₂, mem_image_of_mem _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ },
{ rw [image_inter_on],
{ refine image_subset_iff.2 _,
exact λ x ⟨⟨h₁, _⟩, h₂, _⟩, hs ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ },
{ exact λ x ⟨_, hx⟩ y ⟨_, hy⟩, h x hx y hy } }
end
lemma map_inf {f g : filter α} {m : α → β} (h : ∀ x y, m x = m y → x = y) :
map m (f ⊓ g) = map m f ⊓ map m g :=
map_inf' univ_mem_sets univ_mem_sets (assume x _ y _, h x y)
lemma map_eq_comap_of_inverse {f : filter α} {m : α → β} {n : β → α}
(h₁ : m ∘ n = id) (h₂ : n ∘ m = id) : map m f = comap n f :=
le_antisymm
(assume b ⟨a, ha, (h : preimage n a ⊆ b)⟩, f.sets_of_superset ha $
calc a = preimage (n ∘ m) a : by simp only [h₂, preimage_id, eq_self_iff_true]
... ⊆ preimage m b : preimage_mono h)
(assume b (hb : preimage m b ∈ f.sets),
⟨preimage m b, hb, show preimage (m ∘ n) b ⊆ b, by simp only [h₁]; apply subset.refl⟩)
lemma map_swap_eq_comap_swap {f : filter (α × β)} : prod.swap <$> f = comap prod.swap f :=
map_eq_comap_of_inverse prod.swap_swap_eq prod.swap_swap_eq
lemma le_map {f : filter α} {m : α → β} {g : filter β} (h : ∀s∈f.sets, m '' s ∈ g.sets) :
g ≤ f.map m :=
assume s hs, mem_sets_of_superset (h _ hs) $ image_preimage_subset _ _
section applicative
@[simp] lemma mem_pure_sets {a : α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ (pure a : filter α).sets ↔ a ∈ s :=
by simp only [iff_self, pure_def, mem_principal_sets, singleton_subset_iff]
lemma singleton_mem_pure_sets {a : α} : {a} ∈ (pure a : filter α).sets :=
by simp only [mem_singleton, pure_def, mem_principal_sets, singleton_subset_iff]
@[simp] lemma pure_neq_bot {α : Type u} {a : α} : pure a ≠ (⊥ : filter α) :=
by simp only [pure, has_pure.pure, ne.def, not_false_iff, singleton_ne_empty, principal_eq_bot_iff]
lemma mem_seq_sets_def {f : filter (α → β)} {g : filter α} {s : set β} :
s ∈ (f.seq g).sets ↔ (∃u∈f.sets, ∃t∈g.sets, ∀x∈u, ∀y∈t, (x : α → β) y ∈ s) :=
iff.refl _
lemma mem_seq_sets_iff {f : filter (α → β)} {g : filter α} {s : set β} :
s ∈ (f.seq g).sets ↔ (∃u∈f.sets, ∃t∈g.sets, set.seq u t ⊆ s) :=
by simp only [mem_seq_sets_def, seq_subset, exists_prop, iff_self]
lemma mem_map_seq_iff {f : filter α} {g : filter β} {m : α → β → γ} {s : set γ} :
s ∈ ((f.map m).seq g).sets ↔ (∃t u, t ∈ g.sets ∧ u ∈ f.sets ∧ ∀x∈u, ∀y∈t, m x y ∈ s) :=
iff.intro
(assume ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hts⟩, ⟨s, m ⁻¹' t, hs, ht, assume a, hts _⟩)
(assume ⟨t, s, ht, hs, hts⟩, ⟨m '' s, image_mem_map hs, t, ht, assume f ⟨a, has, eq⟩, eq ▸ hts _ has⟩)
lemma seq_mem_seq_sets {f : filter (α → β)} {g : filter α} {s : set (α → β)} {t : set α}
(hs : s ∈ f.sets) (ht : t ∈ g.sets): s.seq t ∈ (f.seq g).sets :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, assume f hf a ha, ⟨f, hf, a, ha, rfl⟩⟩
lemma le_seq {f : filter (α → β)} {g : filter α} {h : filter β}
(hh : ∀t∈f.sets, ∀u∈g.sets, set.seq t u ∈ h.sets) : h ≤ seq f g :=
assume s ⟨t, ht, u, hu, hs⟩, mem_sets_of_superset (hh _ ht _ hu) $
assume b ⟨m, hm, a, ha, eq⟩, eq ▸ hs _ hm _ ha
lemma seq_mono {f₁ f₂ : filter (α → β)} {g₁ g₂ : filter α}
(hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) : f₁.seq g₁ ≤ f₂.seq g₂ :=
le_seq $ assume s hs t ht, seq_mem_seq_sets (hf hs) (hg ht)
@[simp] lemma pure_seq_eq_map (g : α → β) (f : filter α) : seq (pure g) f = f.map g :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (le_map $ assume s hs, _) (le_seq $ assume s hs t ht, _),
{ rw ← singleton_seq, apply seq_mem_seq_sets _ hs,
simp only [mem_singleton, pure_def, mem_principal_sets, singleton_subset_iff] },
{ rw mem_pure_sets at hs,
refine sets_of_superset (map g f) (image_mem_map ht) _,
rintros b ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩, exact ⟨g, hs, a, ha, rfl⟩ }
end
@[simp] lemma map_pure (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f (pure a) = pure (f a) :=
le_antisymm
(le_principal_iff.2 $ sets_of_superset (map f (pure a)) (image_mem_map singleton_mem_pure_sets) $
by simp only [image_singleton, mem_singleton, singleton_subset_iff])
(le_map $ assume s, begin
simp only [mem_image, pure_def, mem_principal_sets, singleton_subset_iff],
exact assume has, ⟨a, has, rfl⟩
end)
@[simp] lemma seq_pure (f : filter (α → β)) (a : α) : seq f (pure a) = map (λg:α → β, g a) f :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (le_map $ assume s hs, _) (le_seq $ assume s hs t ht, _),
{ rw ← seq_singleton, exact seq_mem_seq_sets hs
(by simp only [mem_singleton, pure_def, mem_principal_sets, singleton_subset_iff]) },
{ rw mem_pure_sets at ht,
refine sets_of_superset (map (λg:α→β, g a) f) (image_mem_map hs) _,
rintros b ⟨g, hg, rfl⟩, exact ⟨g, hg, a, ht, rfl⟩ }
end
@[simp] lemma seq_assoc (x : filter α) (g : filter (α → β)) (h : filter (β → γ)) :
seq h (seq g x) = seq (seq (map (∘) h) g) x :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (le_seq $ assume s hs t ht, _) (le_seq $ assume s hs t ht, _),
{ rcases mem_seq_sets_iff.1 hs with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, hs⟩,
rcases mem_map_sets_iff.1 hu with ⟨w, hw, hu⟩,
refine mem_sets_of_superset _
(set.seq_mono (subset.trans (set.seq_mono hu (subset.refl _)) hs) (subset.refl _)),
rw ← set.seq_seq,
exact seq_mem_seq_sets hw (seq_mem_seq_sets hv ht) },
{ rcases mem_seq_sets_iff.1 ht with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, ht⟩,
refine mem_sets_of_superset _ (set.seq_mono (subset.refl _) ht),
rw set.seq_seq,
exact seq_mem_seq_sets (seq_mem_seq_sets (image_mem_map hs) hu) hv }
end
lemma prod_map_seq_comm (f : filter α) (g : filter β) :
(map prod.mk f).seq g = seq (map (λb a, (a, b)) g) f :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (le_seq $ assume s hs t ht, _) (le_seq $ assume s hs t ht, _),
{ rcases mem_map_sets_iff.1 hs with ⟨u, hu, hs⟩,
refine mem_sets_of_superset _ (set.seq_mono hs (subset.refl _)),
rw ← set.prod_image_seq_comm,
exact seq_mem_seq_sets (image_mem_map ht) hu },
{ rcases mem_map_sets_iff.1 hs with ⟨u, hu, hs⟩,
refine mem_sets_of_superset _ (set.seq_mono hs (subset.refl _)),
rw set.prod_image_seq_comm,
exact seq_mem_seq_sets (image_mem_map ht) hu }
end
instance : is_lawful_functor (filter : Type u → Type u) :=
{ id_map := assume α f, map_id,
comp_map := assume α β γ f g a, map_map.symm }
instance : is_lawful_applicative (filter : Type u → Type u) :=
{ pure_seq_eq_map := assume α β, pure_seq_eq_map,
map_pure := assume α β, map_pure,
seq_pure := assume α β, seq_pure,
seq_assoc := assume α β γ, seq_assoc }
instance : is_comm_applicative (filter : Type u → Type u) :=
⟨assume α β f g, prod_map_seq_comm f g⟩
lemma {l} seq_eq_filter_seq {α β : Type l} (f : filter (α → β)) (g : filter α) :
f <*> g = seq f g := rfl
end applicative
/- bind equations -/
section bind
@[simp] lemma mem_bind_sets {s : set β} {f : filter α} {m : α → filter β} :
s ∈ (bind f m).sets ↔ ∃t ∈ f.sets, ∀x ∈ t, s ∈ (m x).sets :=
calc s ∈ (bind f m).sets ↔ {a | s ∈ (m a).sets} ∈ f.sets : by simp only [bind, mem_map, iff_self, mem_join_sets, mem_set_of_eq]
... ↔ (∃t ∈ f.sets, t ⊆ {a | s ∈ (m a).sets}) : exists_sets_subset_iff.symm
... ↔ (∃t ∈ f.sets, ∀x ∈ t, s ∈ (m x).sets) : iff.refl _
lemma bind_mono {f : filter α} {g h : α → filter β} (h₁ : {a | g a ≤ h a} ∈ f.sets) :
bind f g ≤ bind f h :=
assume x h₂, show (_ ∈ f.sets), by filter_upwards [h₁, h₂] assume s gh' h', gh' h'
lemma bind_sup {f g : filter α} {h : α → filter β} :
bind (f ⊔ g) h = bind f h ⊔ bind g h :=
by simp only [bind, sup_join, map_sup, eq_self_iff_true]
lemma bind_mono2 {f g : filter α} {h : α → filter β} (h₁ : f ≤ g) :
bind f h ≤ bind g h :=
assume s h', h₁ h'
lemma principal_bind {s : set α} {f : α → filter β} :
(bind (principal s) f) = (⨆x ∈ s, f x) :=
show join (map f (principal s)) = (⨆x ∈ s, f x),
by simp only [Sup_image, join_principal_eq_Sup, map_principal, eq_self_iff_true]
end bind
lemma infi_neq_bot_of_directed {f : ι → filter α}
(hn : nonempty α) (hd : directed (≥) f) (hb : ∀i, f i ≠ ⊥) : (infi f) ≠ ⊥ :=
let ⟨x⟩ := hn in
assume h, have he: ∅ ∈ (infi f).sets, from h.symm ▸ mem_bot_sets,
classical.by_cases
(assume : nonempty ι,
have ∃i, ∅ ∈ (f i).sets,
by rw [infi_sets_eq hd this] at he; simp only [mem_Union] at he; assumption,
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := this in
hb i $ bot_unique $
assume s _, (f i).sets_of_superset hi $ empty_subset _)
(assume : ¬ nonempty ι,
have univ ⊆ (∅ : set α),
begin
rw [←principal_mono, principal_univ, principal_empty, ←h],
exact (le_infi $ assume i, false.elim $ this ⟨i⟩)
end,
this $ mem_univ x)
lemma infi_neq_bot_iff_of_directed {f : ι → filter α}
(hn : nonempty α) (hd : directed (≥) f) : (infi f) ≠ ⊥ ↔ (∀i, f i ≠ ⊥) :=
⟨assume neq_bot i eq_bot, neq_bot $ bot_unique $ infi_le_of_le i $ eq_bot ▸ le_refl _,
infi_neq_bot_of_directed hn hd⟩
lemma mem_infi_sets {f : ι → filter α} (i : ι) : ∀{s}, s ∈ (f i).sets → s ∈ (⨅i, f i).sets :=
show (⨅i, f i) ≤ f i, from infi_le _ _
@[elab_as_eliminator]
lemma infi_sets_induct {f : ι → filter α} {s : set α} (hs : s ∈ (infi f).sets) {p : set α → Prop}
(uni : p univ)
(ins : ∀{i s₁ s₂}, s₁ ∈ (f i).sets → p s₂ → p (s₁ ∩ s₂))
(upw : ∀{s₁ s₂}, s₁ ⊆ s₂ → p s₁ → p s₂) : p s :=
begin
rw [infi_sets_eq_finite] at hs,
simp only [mem_Union, (finset.inf_eq_infi _ _).symm] at hs,
rcases hs with ⟨is, his⟩,
revert s,
refine finset.induction_on is _ _,
{ assume s hs, rwa [mem_top_sets.1 hs] },
{ rintros ⟨i⟩ js his ih s hs,
rw [finset.inf_insert, mem_inf_sets] at hs,
rcases hs with ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, hs⟩,
exact upw hs (ins hs₁ (ih hs₂)) }
end
/- tendsto -/
/-- `tendsto` is the generic "limit of a function" predicate.
`tendsto f l₁ l₂` asserts that for every `l₂` neighborhood `a`,
the `f`-preimage of `a` is an `l₁` neighborhood. -/
def tendsto (f : α → β) (l₁ : filter α) (l₂ : filter β) := l₁.map f ≤ l₂
lemma tendsto_def {f : α → β} {l₁ : filter α} {l₂ : filter β} :
tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ s ∈ l₂.sets, f ⁻¹' s ∈ l₁.sets := iff.rfl
lemma tendsto_iff_comap {f : α → β} {l₁ : filter α} {l₂ : filter β} :
tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ l₁ ≤ l₂.comap f :=
map_le_iff_le_comap
lemma tendsto_cong {f₁ f₂ : α → β} {l₁ : filter α} {l₂ : filter β}
(h : tendsto f₁ l₁ l₂) (hl : {x | f₁ x = f₂ x} ∈ l₁.sets) : tendsto f₂ l₁ l₂ :=
by rwa [tendsto, ←map_cong hl]
lemma tendsto_id' {x y : filter α} : x ≤ y → tendsto id x y :=
by simp only [tendsto, map_id, forall_true_iff] {contextual := tt}
lemma tendsto_id {x : filter α} : tendsto id x x := tendsto_id' $ le_refl x
lemma tendsto.comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} {x : filter α} {y : filter β} {z : filter γ}
(hf : tendsto f x y) (hg : tendsto g y z) : tendsto (g ∘ f) x z :=
calc map (g ∘ f) x = map g (map f x) : by rw [map_map]
... ≤ map g y : map_mono hf
... ≤ z : hg
lemma tendsto_le_left {f : α → β} {x y : filter α} {z : filter β}
(h : y ≤ x) : tendsto f x z → tendsto f y z :=
le_trans (map_mono h)
lemma tendsto_le_right {f : α → β} {x : filter α} {y z : filter β}
(h₁ : y ≤ z) (h₂ : tendsto f x y) : tendsto f x z :=
le_trans h₂ h₁
lemma tendsto_map {f : α → β} {x : filter α} : tendsto f x (map f x) := le_refl (map f x)
lemma tendsto_map' {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {x : filter α} {y : filter γ}
(h : tendsto (f ∘ g) x y) : tendsto f (map g x) y :=
by rwa [tendsto, map_map]
lemma tendsto_map'_iff {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {x : filter α} {y : filter γ} :
tendsto f (map g x) y ↔ tendsto (f ∘ g) x y :=
by rw [tendsto, map_map]; refl
lemma tendsto_comap {f : α → β} {x : filter β} : tendsto f (comap f x) x :=
map_comap_le
lemma tendsto_comap_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} {a : filter α} {c : filter γ} :
tendsto f a (c.comap g) ↔ tendsto (g ∘ f) a c :=
⟨assume h, h.comp tendsto_comap, assume h, map_le_iff_le_comap.mp $ by rwa [map_map]⟩
lemma tendsto_comap'_iff {m : α → β} {f : filter α} {g : filter β} {i : γ → α}
(h : range i ∈ f.sets) : tendsto (m ∘ i) (comap i f) g ↔ tendsto m f g :=
by rw [tendsto, ← map_compose]; simp only [(∘), map_comap h, tendsto]
lemma comap_eq_of_inverse {f : filter α} {g : filter β} {φ : α → β} (ψ : β → α)
(eq : ψ ∘ φ = id) (hφ : tendsto φ f g) (hψ : tendsto ψ g f) : comap φ g = f :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (le_trans (comap_mono $ map_le_iff_le_comap.1 hψ) _) (map_le_iff_le_comap.1 hφ),
rw [comap_comap_comp, eq, comap_id],
exact le_refl _
end
lemma map_eq_of_inverse {f : filter α} {g : filter β} {φ : α → β} (ψ : β → α)
(eq : φ ∘ ψ = id) (hφ : tendsto φ f g) (hψ : tendsto ψ g f) : map φ f = g :=
begin
refine le_antisymm hφ (le_trans _ (map_mono hψ)),
rw [map_map, eq, map_id],
exact le_refl _
end
lemma tendsto_inf {f : α → β} {x : filter α} {y₁ y₂ : filter β} :
tendsto f x (y₁ ⊓ y₂) ↔ tendsto f x y₁ ∧ tendsto f x y₂ :=
by simp only [tendsto, lattice.le_inf_iff, iff_self]
lemma tendsto_inf_left {f : α → β} {x₁ x₂ : filter α} {y : filter β}
(h : tendsto f x₁ y) : tendsto f (x₁ ⊓ x₂) y :=
le_trans (map_mono inf_le_left) h
lemma tendsto_inf_right {f : α → β} {x₁ x₂ : filter α} {y : filter β}
(h : tendsto f x₂ y) : tendsto f (x₁ ⊓ x₂) y :=
le_trans (map_mono inf_le_right) h
lemma tendsto_infi {f : α → β} {x : filter α} {y : ι → filter β} :
tendsto f x (⨅i, y i) ↔ ∀i, tendsto f x (y i) :=
by simp only [tendsto, iff_self, lattice.le_infi_iff]
lemma tendsto_infi' {f : α → β} {x : ι → filter α} {y : filter β} (i : ι) :
tendsto f (x i) y → tendsto f (⨅i, x i) y :=
tendsto_le_left (infi_le _ _)
lemma tendsto_principal {f : α → β} {a : filter α} {s : set β} :
tendsto f a (principal s) ↔ {a | f a ∈ s} ∈ a.sets :=
by simp only [tendsto, le_principal_iff, mem_map, iff_self]
lemma tendsto_principal_principal {f : α → β} {s : set α} {t : set β} :
tendsto f (principal s) (principal t) ↔ ∀a∈s, f a ∈ t :=
by simp only [tendsto, image_subset_iff, le_principal_iff, map_principal, mem_principal_sets]; refl
lemma tendsto_pure_pure (f : α → β) (a : α) :
tendsto f (pure a) (pure (f a)) :=
show filter.map f (pure a) ≤ pure (f a),
by rw [filter.map_pure]; exact le_refl _
lemma tendsto_const_pure {a : filter α} {b : β} : tendsto (λa, b) a (pure b) :=
by simp [tendsto]; exact univ_mem_sets
lemma tendsto_if {l₁ : filter α} {l₂ : filter β}
{f g : α → β} {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
(h₀ : tendsto f (l₁ ⊓ principal p) l₂)
(h₁ : tendsto g (l₁ ⊓ principal { x | ¬ p x }) l₂) :
tendsto (λ x, if p x then f x else g x) l₁ l₂ :=
begin
revert h₀ h₁, simp only [tendsto_def, mem_inf_principal],
intros h₀ h₁ s hs,
apply mem_sets_of_superset (inter_mem_sets (h₀ s hs) (h₁ s hs)),
rintros x ⟨hp₀, hp₁⟩, dsimp,
by_cases h : p x,
{ rw if_pos h, exact hp₀ h },
rw if_neg h, exact hp₁ h
end
section prod
variables {s : set α} {t : set β} {f : filter α} {g : filter β}
/- The product filter cannot be defined using the monad structure on filters. For example:
F := do {x <- seq, y <- top, return (x, y)}
hence:
s ∈ F <-> ∃n, [n..∞] × univ ⊆ s
G := do {y <- top, x <- seq, return (x, y)}
hence:
s ∈ G <-> ∀i:ℕ, ∃n, [n..∞] × {i} ⊆ s
Now ⋃i, [i..∞] × {i} is in G but not in F.
As product filter we want to have F as result.
-/
/-- Product of filters. This is the filter generated by cartesian products
of elements of the component filters. -/
protected def prod (f : filter α) (g : filter β) : filter (α × β) :=
f.comap prod.fst ⊓ g.comap prod.snd
lemma prod_mem_prod {s : set α} {t : set β} {f : filter α} {g : filter β}
(hs : s ∈ f.sets) (ht : t ∈ g.sets) : set.prod s t ∈ (filter.prod f g).sets :=
inter_mem_inf_sets (preimage_mem_comap hs) (preimage_mem_comap ht)
lemma mem_prod_iff {s : set (α×β)} {f : filter α} {g : filter β} :
s ∈ (filter.prod f g).sets ↔ (∃t₁∈f.sets, ∃t₂∈g.sets, set.prod t₁ t₂ ⊆ s) :=
begin
simp only [filter.prod],
split,
exact assume ⟨t₁, ⟨s₁, hs₁, hts₁⟩, t₂, ⟨s₂, hs₂, hts₂⟩, h⟩,
⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, subset.trans (inter_subset_inter hts₁ hts₂) h⟩,
exact assume ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, h⟩,
⟨prod.fst ⁻¹' t₁, ⟨t₁, ht₁, subset.refl _⟩, prod.snd ⁻¹' t₂, ⟨t₂, ht₂, subset.refl _⟩, h⟩
end
lemma tendsto_fst {f : filter α} {g : filter β} : tendsto prod.fst (filter.prod f g) f :=
tendsto_inf_left tendsto_comap
lemma tendsto_snd {f : filter α} {g : filter β} : tendsto prod.snd (filter.prod f g) g :=
tendsto_inf_right tendsto_comap
lemma tendsto.prod_mk {f : filter α} {g : filter β} {h : filter γ} {m₁ : α → β} {m₂ : α → γ}
(h₁ : tendsto m₁ f g) (h₂ : tendsto m₂ f h) : tendsto (λx, (m₁ x, m₂ x)) f (filter.prod g h) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
lemma prod_infi_left {f : ι → filter α} {g : filter β} (i : ι) :
filter.prod (⨅i, f i) g = (⨅i, filter.prod (f i) g) :=
by rw [filter.prod, comap_infi, infi_inf i]; simp only [filter.prod, eq_self_iff_true]
lemma prod_infi_right {f : filter α} {g : ι → filter β} (i : ι) :
filter.prod f (⨅i, g i) = (⨅i, filter.prod f (g i)) :=
by rw [filter.prod, comap_infi, inf_infi i]; simp only [filter.prod, eq_self_iff_true]
lemma prod_mono {f₁ f₂ : filter α} {g₁ g₂ : filter β} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) :
filter.prod f₁ g₁ ≤ filter.prod f₂ g₂ :=
inf_le_inf (comap_mono hf) (comap_mono hg)
lemma prod_comap_comap_eq {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : filter α₁} {f₂ : filter α₂} {m₁ : β₁ → α₁} {m₂ : β₂ → α₂} :
filter.prod (comap m₁ f₁) (comap m₂ f₂) = comap (λp:β₁×β₂, (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (filter.prod f₁ f₂) :=
by simp only [filter.prod, comap_comap_comp, eq_self_iff_true, comap_inf]
lemma prod_comm' : filter.prod f g = comap (prod.swap) (filter.prod g f) :=
by simp only [filter.prod, comap_comap_comp, (∘), inf_comm, prod.fst_swap,
eq_self_iff_true, prod.snd_swap, comap_inf]
lemma prod_comm : filter.prod f g = map (λp:β×α, (p.2, p.1)) (filter.prod g f) :=
by rw [prod_comm', ← map_swap_eq_comap_swap]; refl
lemma prod_map_map_eq {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : filter α₁} {f₂ : filter α₂} {m₁ : α₁ → β₁} {m₂ : α₂ → β₂} :
filter.prod (map m₁ f₁) (map m₂ f₂) = map (λp:α₁×α₂, (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (filter.prod f₁ f₂) :=
le_antisymm
(assume s hs,
let ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, h⟩ := mem_prod_iff.mp hs in
filter.sets_of_superset _ (prod_mem_prod (image_mem_map hs₁) (image_mem_map hs₂)) $
calc set.prod (m₁ '' s₁) (m₂ '' s₂) = (λp:α₁×α₂, (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) '' set.prod s₁ s₂ :
set.prod_image_image_eq
... ⊆ _ : by rwa [image_subset_iff])
((tendsto_fst.comp (le_refl _)).prod_mk (tendsto_snd.comp (le_refl _)))
lemma map_prod (m : α × β → γ) (f : filter α) (g : filter β) :
map m (f.prod g) = (f.map (λa b, m (a, b))).seq g :=
begin
simp [filter.ext_iff, mem_prod_iff, mem_map_seq_iff],
assume s,
split,
exact assume ⟨t, ht, s, hs, h⟩, ⟨s, hs, t, ht, assume x hx y hy, @h ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩⟩,
exact assume ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩, ⟨t, ht, s, hs, assume ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩, h x hx y hy⟩
end
lemma prod_eq {f : filter α} {g : filter β} : f.prod g = (f.map prod.mk).seq g :=
have h : _ := map_prod id f g, by rwa [map_id] at h
lemma prod_inf_prod {f₁ f₂ : filter α} {g₁ g₂ : filter β} :
filter.prod f₁ g₁ ⊓ filter.prod f₂ g₂ = filter.prod (f₁ ⊓ f₂) (g₁ ⊓ g₂) :=
by simp only [filter.prod, comap_inf, inf_comm, inf_assoc, lattice.inf_left_comm]
@[simp] lemma prod_bot {f : filter α} : filter.prod f (⊥ : filter β) = ⊥ := by simp [filter.prod]
@[simp] lemma bot_prod {g : filter β} : filter.prod (⊥ : filter α) g = ⊥ := by simp [filter.prod]
@[simp] lemma prod_principal_principal {s : set α} {t : set β} :
filter.prod (principal s) (principal t) = principal (set.prod s t) :=
by simp only [filter.prod, comap_principal, principal_eq_iff_eq, comap_principal, inf_principal]; refl
@[simp] lemma prod_pure_pure {a : α} {b : β} : filter.prod (pure a) (pure b) = pure (a, b) :=
by simp
lemma prod_eq_bot {f : filter α} {g : filter β} : filter.prod f g = ⊥ ↔ (f = ⊥ ∨ g = ⊥) :=
begin
split,
{ assume h,
rcases mem_prod_iff.1 (empty_in_sets_eq_bot.2 h) with ⟨s, hs, t, ht, hst⟩,
rw [subset_empty_iff, set.prod_eq_empty_iff] at hst,
cases hst with s_eq t_eq,
{ left, exact empty_in_sets_eq_bot.1 (s_eq ▸ hs) },
{ right, exact empty_in_sets_eq_bot.1 (t_eq ▸ ht) } },
{ rintros (rfl | rfl),
exact bot_prod,
exact prod_bot }
end
lemma prod_neq_bot {f : filter α} {g : filter β} : filter.prod f g ≠ ⊥ ↔ (f ≠ ⊥ ∧ g ≠ ⊥) :=
by rw [(≠), prod_eq_bot, not_or_distrib]
lemma tendsto_prod_iff {f : α × β → γ} {x : filter α} {y : filter β} {z : filter γ} :
filter.tendsto f (filter.prod x y) z ↔
∀ W ∈ z.sets, ∃ U ∈ x.sets, ∃ V ∈ y.sets, ∀ x y, x ∈ U → y ∈ V → f (x, y) ∈ W :=
by simp only [tendsto_def, mem_prod_iff, prod_sub_preimage_iff, exists_prop, iff_self]
end prod
/- at_top and at_bot -/
/-- `at_top` is the filter representing the limit `→ ∞` on an ordered set.
It is generated by the collection of up-sets `{b | a ≤ b}`.
(The preorder need not have a top element for this to be well defined,
and indeed is trivial when a top element exists.) -/
def at_top [preorder α] : filter α := ⨅ a, principal {b | a ≤ b}
/-- `at_bot` is the filter representing the limit `→ -∞` on an ordered set.
It is generated by the collection of down-sets `{b | b ≤ a}`.
(The preorder need not have a bottom element for this to be well defined,
and indeed is trivial when a bottom element exists.) -/
def at_bot [preorder α] : filter α := ⨅ a, principal {b | b ≤ a}
lemma mem_at_top [preorder α] (a : α) : {b : α | a ≤ b} ∈ (@at_top α _).sets :=
mem_infi_sets a $ subset.refl _
@[simp] lemma at_top_ne_bot [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] : (at_top : filter α) ≠ ⊥ :=
infi_neq_bot_of_directed (by apply_instance)
(assume a b, ⟨a ⊔ b, by simp only [ge, le_principal_iff, forall_const, set_of_subset_set_of,
mem_principal_sets, and_self, sup_le_iff, forall_true_iff] {contextual := tt}⟩)
(assume a, by simp only [principal_eq_bot_iff, ne.def, principal_eq_bot_iff]; exact ne_empty_of_mem (le_refl a))
@[simp] lemma mem_at_top_sets [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] {s : set α} :
s ∈ (at_top : filter α).sets ↔ ∃a:α, ∀b≥a, b ∈ s :=
let ⟨a⟩ := ‹nonempty α› in
iff.intro
(assume h, infi_sets_induct h ⟨a, by simp only [forall_const, mem_univ, forall_true_iff]⟩
(assume a s₁ s₂ ha ⟨b, hb⟩, ⟨a ⊔ b,
assume c hc, ⟨ha $ le_trans le_sup_left hc, hb _ $ le_trans le_sup_right hc⟩⟩)
(assume s₁ s₂ h ⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨a, assume b hb, h $ ha _ hb⟩))
(assume ⟨a, h⟩, mem_infi_sets a $ assume x, h x)
lemma map_at_top_eq [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] {f : α → β} :
at_top.map f = (⨅a, principal $ f '' {a' | a ≤ a'}) :=
calc map f (⨅a, principal {a' | a ≤ a'}) = (⨅a, map f $ principal {a' | a ≤ a'}) :
map_infi_eq (assume a b, ⟨a ⊔ b, by simp only [ge, le_principal_iff, forall_const, set_of_subset_set_of,
mem_principal_sets, and_self, sup_le_iff, forall_true_iff] {contextual := tt}⟩)
(by apply_instance)
... = (⨅a, principal $ f '' {a' | a ≤ a'}) : by simp only [map_principal, eq_self_iff_true]
lemma tendsto_at_top [preorder β] (m : α → β) (f : filter α) :
tendsto m f at_top ↔ (∀b, {a | b ≤ m a} ∈ f.sets) :=
by simp only [at_top, tendsto_infi, tendsto_principal]; refl
lemma tendsto_at_top' [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] (f : α → β) (l : filter β) :
tendsto f at_top l ↔ (∀s∈l.sets, ∃a, ∀b≥a, f b ∈ s) :=
by simp only [tendsto_def, mem_at_top_sets]; refl
theorem tendsto_at_top_principal [nonempty β] [semilattice_sup β] {f : β → α} {s : set α} :
tendsto f at_top (principal s) ↔ ∃N, ∀n≥N, f n ∈ s :=
by rw [tendsto_iff_comap, comap_principal, le_principal_iff, mem_at_top_sets]; refl
/-- A function `f` grows to infinity independent of an order-preserving embedding `e`. -/
lemma tendsto_at_top_embedding {α β γ : Type*} [preorder β] [preorder γ]
{f : α → β} {e : β → γ} {l : filter α}
(hm : ∀b₁ b₂, e b₁ ≤ e b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂) (hu : ∀c, ∃b, c ≤ e b) :
tendsto (e ∘ f) l at_top ↔ tendsto f l at_top :=
begin
rw [tendsto_at_top, tendsto_at_top],
split,
{ assume hc b,
filter_upwards [hc (e b)] assume a, (hm b (f a)).1 },
{ assume hb c,
rcases hu c with ⟨b, hc⟩,
filter_upwards [hb b] assume a ha, le_trans hc ((hm b (f a)).2 ha) }
end
lemma tendsto_at_top_at_top [nonempty α] [semilattice_sup α] [preorder β] (f : α → β) :
tendsto f at_top at_top ↔ ∀ b : β, ∃ i : α, ∀ a : α, i ≤ a → b ≤ f a :=
iff.trans tendsto_infi $ forall_congr $ assume b, tendsto_at_top_principal
lemma tendsto_finset_image_at_top_at_top {i : β → γ} {j : γ → β} (h : ∀x, j (i x) = x) :
tendsto (λs:finset γ, s.image j) at_top at_top :=
tendsto_infi.2 $ assume s, tendsto_infi' (s.image i) $ tendsto_principal_principal.2 $
assume t (ht : s.image i ⊆ t),
calc s = (s.image i).image j :
by simp only [finset.image_image, (∘), h]; exact finset.image_id.symm
... ⊆ t.image j : finset.image_subset_image ht
lemma prod_at_top_at_top_eq {β₁ β₂ : Type*} [inhabited β₁] [inhabited β₂] [semilattice_sup β₁]
[semilattice_sup β₂] : filter.prod (@at_top β₁ _) (@at_top β₂ _) = @at_top (β₁ × β₂) _ :=
by simp [at_top, prod_infi_left (default β₁), prod_infi_right (default β₂), infi_prod];
exact infi_comm
lemma prod_map_at_top_eq {α₁ α₂ β₁ β₂ : Type*} [inhabited β₁] [inhabited β₂]
[semilattice_sup β₁] [semilattice_sup β₂] (u₁ : β₁ → α₁) (u₂ : β₂ → α₂) :
filter.prod (map u₁ at_top) (map u₂ at_top) = map (prod.map u₁ u₂) at_top :=
by rw [prod_map_map_eq, prod_at_top_at_top_eq, prod.map_def]
/-- A function `f` maps upwards closed sets (at_top sets) to upwards closed sets when it is a
Galois insertion. The Galois "insertion" and "connection" is weakened to only require it to be an
insertion and a connetion above `b'`. -/
lemma map_at_top_eq_of_gc [semilattice_sup α] [semilattice_sup β] {f : α → β} (g : β → α) (b' : β)(hf : monotone f) (gc : ∀a, ∀b≥b', f a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ g b) (hgi : ∀b≥b', b ≤ f (g b)) :
map f at_top = at_top :=
begin
rw [@map_at_top_eq α _ ⟨g b'⟩],
refine le_antisymm
(le_infi $ assume b, infi_le_of_le (g (b ⊔ b')) $ principal_mono.2 $ image_subset_iff.2 _)
(le_infi $ assume a, infi_le_of_le (f a ⊔ b') $ principal_mono.2 _),
{ assume a ha, exact (le_trans le_sup_left $ le_trans (hgi _ le_sup_right) $ hf ha) },
{ assume b hb,
have hb' : b' ≤ b := le_trans le_sup_right hb,
exact ⟨g b, (gc _ _ hb').1 (le_trans le_sup_left hb),
le_antisymm ((gc _ _ hb').2 (le_refl _)) (hgi _ hb')⟩ }
end
lemma map_add_at_top_eq_nat (k : ℕ) : map (λa, a + k) at_top = at_top :=
map_at_top_eq_of_gc (λa, a - k) k
(assume a b h, add_le_add_right h k)
(assume a b h, (nat.le_sub_right_iff_add_le h).symm)
(assume a h, by rw [nat.sub_add_cancel h])
lemma map_sub_at_top_eq_nat (k : ℕ) : map (λa, a - k) at_top = at_top :=
map_at_top_eq_of_gc (λa, a + k) 0
(assume a b h, nat.sub_le_sub_right h _)
(assume a b _, nat.sub_le_right_iff_le_add)
(assume b _, by rw [nat.add_sub_cancel])
lemma tendso_add_at_top_nat (k : ℕ) : tendsto (λa, a + k) at_top at_top :=
le_of_eq (map_add_at_top_eq_nat k)
lemma tendso_sub_at_top_nat (k : ℕ) : tendsto (λa, a - k) at_top at_top :=
le_of_eq (map_sub_at_top_eq_nat k)
lemma tendsto_add_at_top_iff_nat {f : ℕ → α} {l : filter α} (k : ℕ) :
tendsto (λn, f (n + k)) at_top l ↔ tendsto f at_top l :=
show tendsto (f ∘ (λn, n + k)) at_top l ↔ tendsto f at_top l,
by rw [← tendsto_map'_iff, map_add_at_top_eq_nat]
lemma map_div_at_top_eq_nat (k : ℕ) (hk : k > 0) : map (λa, a / k) at_top = at_top :=
map_at_top_eq_of_gc (λb, b * k + (k - 1)) 1
(assume a b h, nat.div_le_div_right h)
(assume a b _,
calc a / k ≤ b ↔ a / k < b + 1 : by rw [← nat.succ_eq_add_one, nat.lt_succ_iff]
... ↔ a < (b + 1) * k : nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul _ _ hk
... ↔ _ :
begin
cases k,
exact (lt_irrefl _ hk).elim,
simp [mul_add, add_mul, nat.succ_add, nat.lt_succ_iff]
end)
(assume b _,
calc b = (b * k) / k : by rw [nat.mul_div_cancel b hk]
... ≤ (b * k + (k - 1)) / k : nat.div_le_div_right $ nat.le_add_right _ _)
/- ultrafilter -/
section ultrafilter
open zorn
variables {f g : filter α}
/-- An ultrafilter is a minimal (maximal in the set order) proper filter. -/
def is_ultrafilter (f : filter α) := f ≠ ⊥ ∧ ∀g, g ≠ ⊥ → g ≤ f → f ≤ g
lemma ultrafilter_unique (hg : is_ultrafilter g) (hf : f ≠ ⊥) (h : f ≤ g) : f = g :=
le_antisymm h (hg.right _ hf h)
lemma le_of_ultrafilter {g : filter α} (hf : is_ultrafilter f) (h : f ⊓ g ≠ ⊥) :
f ≤ g :=
le_of_inf_eq $ ultrafilter_unique hf h inf_le_left
/-- Equivalent characterization of ultrafilters:
A filter f is an ultrafilter if and only if for each set s,
-s belongs to f if and only if s does not belong to f. -/
lemma ultrafilter_iff_compl_mem_iff_not_mem :
is_ultrafilter f ↔ (∀ s, -s ∈ f.sets ↔ s ∉ f.sets) :=
⟨assume hf s,
⟨assume hns hs,
hf.1 $ empty_in_sets_eq_bot.mp $ by convert f.inter_sets hs hns; rw [inter_compl_self],
assume hs,
have f ≤ principal (-s), from
le_of_ultrafilter hf $ assume h, hs $ mem_sets_of_neq_bot $
by simp only [h, eq_self_iff_true, lattice.neg_neg],
by simp only [le_principal_iff] at this; assumption⟩,
assume hf,
⟨mt empty_in_sets_eq_bot.mpr ((hf ∅).mp (by convert f.univ_sets; rw [compl_empty])),
assume g hg g_le s hs, classical.by_contradiction $ mt (hf s).mpr $
assume : - s ∈ f.sets,
have s ∩ -s ∈ g.sets, from inter_mem_sets hs (g_le this),
by simp only [empty_in_sets_eq_bot, hg, inter_compl_self] at this; contradiction⟩⟩
lemma mem_or_compl_mem_of_ultrafilter (hf : is_ultrafilter f) (s : set α) :
s ∈ f.sets ∨ - s ∈ f.sets :=
classical.or_iff_not_imp_left.2 (ultrafilter_iff_compl_mem_iff_not_mem.mp hf s).mpr
lemma mem_or_mem_of_ultrafilter {s t : set α} (hf : is_ultrafilter f) (h : s ∪ t ∈ f.sets) :
s ∈ f.sets ∨ t ∈ f.sets :=
(mem_or_compl_mem_of_ultrafilter hf s).imp_right
(assume : -s ∈ f.sets, by filter_upwards [this, h] assume x hnx hx, hx.resolve_left hnx)
lemma mem_of_finite_sUnion_ultrafilter {s : set (set α)} (hf : is_ultrafilter f) (hs : finite s)
: ⋃₀ s ∈ f.sets → ∃t∈s, t ∈ f.sets :=
finite.induction_on hs (by simp only [empty_in_sets_eq_bot, hf.left, mem_empty_eq, sUnion_empty,
forall_prop_of_false, exists_false, not_false_iff, exists_prop_of_false]) $
λ t s' ht' hs' ih, by simp only [exists_prop, mem_insert_iff, set.sUnion_insert]; exact
assume h, (mem_or_mem_of_ultrafilter hf h).elim
(assume : t ∈ f.sets, ⟨t, or.inl rfl, this⟩)
(assume h, let ⟨t, hts', ht⟩ := ih h in ⟨t, or.inr hts', ht⟩)
lemma mem_of_finite_Union_ultrafilter {is : set β} {s : β → set α}
(hf : is_ultrafilter f) (his : finite is) (h : (⋃i∈is, s i) ∈ f.sets) : ∃i∈is, s i ∈ f.sets :=
have his : finite (image s is), from finite_image s his,
have h : (⋃₀ image s is) ∈ f.sets, from by simp only [sUnion_image, set.sUnion_image]; assumption,
let ⟨t, ⟨i, hi, h_eq⟩, (ht : t ∈ f.sets)⟩ := mem_of_finite_sUnion_ultrafilter hf his h in
⟨i, hi, h_eq.symm ▸ ht⟩
lemma ultrafilter_map {f : filter α} {m : α → β} (h : is_ultrafilter f) : is_ultrafilter (map m f) :=
by rw ultrafilter_iff_compl_mem_iff_not_mem at ⊢ h; exact assume s, h (m ⁻¹' s)
lemma ultrafilter_pure {a : α} : is_ultrafilter (pure a) :=
begin
rw ultrafilter_iff_compl_mem_iff_not_mem, intro s,
rw [mem_pure_sets, mem_pure_sets], exact iff.rfl
end
lemma ultrafilter_bind {f : filter α} (hf : is_ultrafilter f) {m : α → filter β}
(hm : ∀ a, is_ultrafilter (m a)) : is_ultrafilter (f.bind m) :=
begin
simp only [ultrafilter_iff_compl_mem_iff_not_mem] at ⊢ hf hm, intro s,
dsimp [bind, join, map],
simp only [hm], apply hf
end
/-- The ultrafilter lemma: Any proper filter is contained in an ultrafilter. -/
lemma exists_ultrafilter (h : f ≠ ⊥) : ∃u, u ≤ f ∧ is_ultrafilter u :=
let
τ := {f' // f' ≠ ⊥ ∧ f' ≤ f},
r : τ → τ → Prop := λt₁ t₂, t₂.val ≤ t₁.val,
⟨a, ha⟩ := inhabited_of_mem_sets h univ_mem_sets,
top : τ := ⟨f, h, le_refl f⟩,
sup : Π(c:set τ), chain r c → τ :=
λc hc, ⟨⨅a:{a:τ // a ∈ insert top c}, a.val.val,
infi_neq_bot_of_directed ⟨a⟩
(directed_of_chain $ chain_insert hc $ assume ⟨b, _, hb⟩ _ _, or.inl hb)
(assume ⟨⟨a, ha, _⟩, _⟩, ha),
infi_le_of_le ⟨top, mem_insert _ _⟩ (le_refl _)⟩
in
have ∀c (hc: chain r c) a (ha : a ∈ c), r a (sup c hc),
from assume c hc a ha, infi_le_of_le ⟨a, mem_insert_of_mem _ ha⟩ (le_refl _),
have (∃ (u : τ), ∀ (a : τ), r u a → r a u),
from zorn (assume c hc, ⟨sup c hc, this c hc⟩) (assume f₁ f₂ f₃ h₁ h₂, le_trans h₂ h₁),
let ⟨uτ, hmin⟩ := this in
⟨uτ.val, uτ.property.right, uτ.property.left, assume g hg₁ hg₂,
hmin ⟨g, hg₁, le_trans hg₂ uτ.property.right⟩ hg₂⟩
/-- Construct an ultrafilter extending a given filter.
The ultrafilter lemma is the assertion that such a filter exists;
we use the axiom of choice to pick one. -/
noncomputable def ultrafilter_of (f : filter α) : filter α :=
if h : f = ⊥ then ⊥ else classical.epsilon (λu, u ≤ f ∧ is_ultrafilter u)
lemma ultrafilter_of_spec (h : f ≠ ⊥) : ultrafilter_of f ≤ f ∧ is_ultrafilter (ultrafilter_of f) :=
begin
have h' := classical.epsilon_spec (exists_ultrafilter h),
simp only [ultrafilter_of, dif_neg, h, dif_neg, not_false_iff],
simp only at h',
assumption
end
lemma ultrafilter_of_le : ultrafilter_of f ≤ f :=
if h : f = ⊥ then by simp only [ultrafilter_of, dif_pos, h, dif_pos, eq_self_iff_true, le_bot_iff]; exact le_refl _
else (ultrafilter_of_spec h).left
lemma ultrafilter_ultrafilter_of (h : f ≠ ⊥) : is_ultrafilter (ultrafilter_of f) :=
(ultrafilter_of_spec h).right
lemma ultrafilter_of_ultrafilter (h : is_ultrafilter f) : ultrafilter_of f = f :=
ultrafilter_unique h (ultrafilter_ultrafilter_of h.left).left ultrafilter_of_le
/-- A filter equals the intersection of all the ultrafilters which contain it. -/
lemma sup_of_ultrafilters (f : filter α) : f = ⨆ (g) (u : is_ultrafilter g) (H : g ≤ f), g :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (supr_le $ λ g, supr_le $ λ u, supr_le $ λ H, H),
intros s hs,
-- If s ∉ f.sets, we'll apply the ultrafilter lemma to the restriction of f to -s.
by_contradiction hs',
let j : (-s) → α := subtype.val,
have j_inv_s : j ⁻¹' s = ∅, by
erw [←preimage_inter_range, subtype.val_range, inter_compl_self, preimage_empty],
let f' := comap j f,
have : f' ≠ ⊥,
{ apply mt empty_in_sets_eq_bot.mpr,
rintro ⟨t, htf, ht⟩,
suffices : t ⊆ s, from absurd (f.sets_of_superset htf this) hs',
rw [subset_empty_iff] at ht,
have : j '' (j ⁻¹' t) = ∅, by rw [ht, image_empty],
erw [image_preimage_eq_inter_range, subtype.val_range, ←subset_compl_iff_disjoint,
set.compl_compl] at this,
exact this },
rcases exists_ultrafilter this with ⟨g', g'f', u'⟩,
simp only [supr_sets_eq, mem_Inter] at hs,
have := hs (g'.map subtype.val) (ultrafilter_map u') (map_le_iff_le_comap.mpr g'f'),
rw [←le_principal_iff, map_le_iff_le_comap, comap_principal, j_inv_s, principal_empty,
le_bot_iff] at this,
exact absurd this u'.1
end
/-- The `tendsto` relation can be checked on ultrafilters. -/
lemma tendsto_iff_ultrafilter (f : α → β) (l₁ : filter α) (l₂ : filter β) :
tendsto f l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ g, is_ultrafilter g → g ≤ l₁ → g.map f ≤ l₂ :=
⟨assume h g u gx, le_trans (map_mono gx) h,
assume h, by rw [sup_of_ultrafilters l₁]; simpa only [tendsto, map_supr, supr_le_iff]⟩
/- The ultrafilter monad. The monad structure on ultrafilters is the
restriction of the one on filters. -/
def ultrafilter (α : Type u) : Type u := {f : filter α // is_ultrafilter f}
def ultrafilter.map (m : α → β) (u : ultrafilter α) : ultrafilter β :=
⟨u.val.map m, ultrafilter_map u.property⟩
def ultrafilter.pure (x : α) : ultrafilter α := ⟨pure x, ultrafilter_pure⟩
def ultrafilter.bind (u : ultrafilter α) (m : α → ultrafilter β) : ultrafilter β :=
⟨u.val.bind (λ a, (m a).val), ultrafilter_bind u.property (λ a, (m a).property)⟩
instance ultrafilter.has_pure : has_pure ultrafilter := ⟨@ultrafilter.pure⟩
instance ultrafilter.has_bind : has_bind ultrafilter := ⟨@ultrafilter.bind⟩
instance ultrafilter.functor : functor ultrafilter := { map := @ultrafilter.map }
instance ultrafilter.monad : monad ultrafilter := { map := @ultrafilter.map }
section
local attribute [instance] filter.monad filter.is_lawful_monad
instance ultrafilter.is_lawful_monad : is_lawful_monad ultrafilter :=
{ id_map := assume α f, subtype.eq (id_map f.val),
pure_bind := assume α β a f, subtype.eq (pure_bind a (subtype.val ∘ f)),
bind_assoc := assume α β γ f m₁ m₂, subtype.eq (filter_eq rfl),
bind_pure_comp_eq_map := assume α β f x, subtype.eq (bind_pure_comp_eq_map _ f x.val) }
end
lemma ultrafilter.eq_iff_val_le_val {u v : ultrafilter α} : u = v ↔ u.val ≤ v.val :=
⟨assume h, by rw h; exact le_refl _,
assume h, by rw subtype.ext; apply ultrafilter_unique v.property u.property.1 h⟩
lemma exists_ultrafilter_iff (f : filter α) : (∃ (u : ultrafilter α), u.val ≤ f) ↔ f ≠ ⊥ :=
⟨assume ⟨u, uf⟩, lattice.neq_bot_of_le_neq_bot u.property.1 uf,
assume h, let ⟨u, uf, hu⟩ := exists_ultrafilter h in ⟨⟨u, hu⟩, uf⟩⟩
end ultrafilter
end filter
namespace filter
variables {α β γ : Type u} {f : β → filter α} {s : γ → set α}
open list
lemma mem_traverse_sets :
∀(fs : list β) (us : list γ),
forall₂ (λb c, s c ∈ (f b).sets) fs us → traverse s us ∈ (traverse f fs).sets
| [] [] forall₂.nil := mem_pure_sets.2 $ mem_singleton _
| (f::fs) (u::us) (forall₂.cons h hs) := seq_mem_seq_sets (image_mem_map h) (mem_traverse_sets fs us hs)
lemma mem_traverse_sets_iff (fs : list β) (t : set (list α)) :
t ∈ (traverse f fs).sets ↔
(∃us:list (set α), forall₂ (λb (s : set α), s ∈ (f b).sets) fs us ∧ sequence us ⊆ t) :=
begin
split,
{ induction fs generalizing t,
case nil { simp only [sequence, pure_def, imp_self, forall₂_nil_left_iff, pure_def,
exists_eq_left, mem_principal_sets, set.pure_def, singleton_subset_iff, traverse_nil] },
case cons : b fs ih t {
assume ht,
rcases mem_seq_sets_iff.1 ht with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, ht⟩,
rcases mem_map_sets_iff.1 hu with ⟨w, hw, hwu⟩,
rcases ih v hv with ⟨us, hus, hu⟩,
exact ⟨w :: us, forall₂.cons hw hus, subset.trans (set.seq_mono hwu hu) ht⟩ } },
{ rintros ⟨us, hus, hs⟩,
exact mem_sets_of_superset (mem_traverse_sets _ _ hus) hs }
end
lemma sequence_mono :
∀(as bs : list (filter α)), forall₂ (≤) as bs → sequence as ≤ sequence bs
| [] [] forall₂.nil := le_refl _
| (a::as) (b::bs) (forall₂.cons h hs) := seq_mono (map_mono h) (sequence_mono as bs hs)
end filter
|
201cf95cfd0d3171dd0215320e30064058a440aa | c3f2fcd060adfa2ca29f924839d2d925e8f2c685 | /tests/lean/var2.lean | 836f1151e628586304f1d5d1d79efbf2822ad68b | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | respu/lean | 6582d19a2f2838a28ecd2b3c6f81c32d07b5341d | 8c76419c60b63d0d9f7bc04ebb0b99812d0ec654 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,882,451,231 | 1,427,747,084,000 | 1,427,747,429,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 186 | lean | import logic
context
universe l
variable A : Type.{l}
variable a : A
parameter B : Type.{l}
parameter b : B
definition foo := fun (H : A = B), cast H a = b
end
check foo
|
4ca6f906e6b6e98d9b75af8904d36b0754167b10 | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /library/init/data/nat/lemmas.lean | 93231a9b8e28b95a62c00b815c29304a4b565a6e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 48,955 | lean | "/-\nCopyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.\nReleased under Apache 2.0 licen(...TRUNCATED) |
1063e5b6df717f78c166abc15b4cfb053add1504 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/algebra/char_p/quotient.lean | d6257701ef9c1a215c155fa1e6e2a067a8b6aa91 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,985 | lean | "/-\nCopyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.\nReleased under Apache 2.0 license as descri(...TRUNCATED) |
c49587b0e4742399525e8b90992db05e8529689c | 77c5b91fae1b966ddd1db969ba37b6f0e4901e88 | /src/ring_theory/adjoin/basic.lean | fb83bd8cfc7f3c7cc687c0180d851cca1fd5a6be | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dexmagic/mathlib | ff48eefc56e2412429b31d4fddd41a976eb287ce | 7a5d15a955a92a90e1d398b2281916b9c41270b2 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,481,322,046 | 1,633,360,193,000 | 1,633,360,193,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,436 | lean | "/-\nCopyright (c) 2019 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.\nReleased under Apache 2.0 license as descri(...TRUNCATED) |
de4120c626a65c49318c3640d9383f536d43c5cf | 453dcd7c0d1ef170b0843a81d7d8caedc9741dce | /linear_algebra/multivariate_polynomial.lean | 67371cb3350e9c8c9872eab0b197bd75dd9f4a64 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | amswerdlow/mathlib | 9af77a1f08486d8fa059448ae2d97795bd12ec0c | 27f96e30b9c9bf518341705c99d641c38638dfd0 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,200,953,598 | 1,534,275,532,000 | 1,534,275,532,000 | 144,564,700 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,534,156,197,000 | 1,534,156,197,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 12,410 | lean | "/-\nCopyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.\nReleased under Apache 2.0 license as (...TRUNCATED) |
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 12