blob_id stringlengths 40 40 | directory_id stringlengths 40 40 | path stringlengths 7 139 | content_id stringlengths 40 40 | detected_licenses listlengths 0 16 | license_type stringclasses 2
values | repo_name stringlengths 7 55 | snapshot_id stringlengths 40 40 | revision_id stringlengths 40 40 | branch_name stringclasses 6
values | visit_date int64 1,471B 1,694B | revision_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | committer_date int64 1,378B 1,694B | github_id float64 1.33M 604M ⌀ | star_events_count int64 0 43.5k | fork_events_count int64 0 1.5k | gha_license_id stringclasses 6
values | gha_event_created_at int64 1,402B 1,695B ⌀ | gha_created_at int64 1,359B 1,637B ⌀ | gha_language stringclasses 19
values | src_encoding stringclasses 2
values | language stringclasses 1
value | is_vendor bool 1
class | is_generated bool 1
class | length_bytes int64 3 6.4M | extension stringclasses 4
values | content stringlengths 3 6.12M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
61c4625f9380253c79d65bdf9145ac02c6a49aac | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/data/int/absolute_value.lean | 5c3a369601a7d5cebf6cb7d3d2176e6a63b168cc | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,080 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import algebra.module.basic
import group_theory.group_action.units
import data.int.cast
import algebra.order.absolute_value
/-!
# Absolute values and the integers
This file contains some results on absolute values applied to integers.
## Main results
* `absolute_value.map_units_int`: an absolute value sends all units of `ℤ` to `1`
-/
variables {R S : Type*} [ring R] [linear_ordered_comm_ring S]
@[simp]
lemma absolute_value.map_units_int (abv : absolute_value ℤ S) (x : ℤˣ) :
abv x = 1 :=
by rcases int.units_eq_one_or x with (rfl | rfl); simp
@[simp]
lemma absolute_value.map_units_int_cast [nontrivial R] (abv : absolute_value R S) (x : ℤˣ) :
abv ((x : ℤ) : R) = 1 :=
by rcases int.units_eq_one_or x with (rfl | rfl); simp
@[simp]
lemma absolute_value.map_units_int_smul (abv : absolute_value R S) (x : ℤˣ) (y : R) :
abv (x • y) = abv y :=
by rcases int.units_eq_one_or x with (rfl | rfl); simp
|
e0b0bd52e6b6b898c91f4d92832dfa9dfe4fb784 | bbecf0f1968d1fba4124103e4f6b55251d08e9c4 | /src/group_theory/perm/list.lean | 7c292af0366fb831d48777ba4195bf9ff3f2afb0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | waynemunro/mathlib | e3fd4ff49f4cb43d4a8ded59d17be407bc5ee552 | 065a70810b5480d584033f7bbf8e0409480c2118 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,417,182,397 | 1,634,644,781,000 | 1,634,644,781,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,371 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import data.list.rotate
import group_theory.perm.support
/-!
# Permutations from a list
A list `l : list α` can be interpreted as a `equiv.perm α` where each element in the list
is permuted to the next one, defined as `form_perm`. When we have that `nodup l`,
we prove that `equiv.perm.support (form_perm l) = l.to_finset`, and that
`form_perm l` is rotationally invariant, in `form_perm_rotate`.
When there are duplicate elements in `l`, how and in what arrangement with respect to the other
elements they appear in the list determines the formed permutation.
This is because `list.form_perm` is implemented as a product of `equiv.swap`s.
That means that presence of a sublist of two adjacent duplicates like `[..., x, x, ...]`
will produce the same permutation as if the adjacent duplicates were not present.
The `list.form_perm` definition is meant to primarily be used with `nodup l`, so that
the resulting permutation is cyclic (if `l` has at least two elements).
The presence of duplicates in a particular placement can lead `list.form_perm` to produce a
nontrivial permutation that is noncyclic.
-/
namespace list
variables {α β : Type*}
section form_perm
variables [decidable_eq α] (l : list α)
open equiv equiv.perm
/--
A list `l : list α` can be interpreted as a `equiv.perm α` where each element in the list
is permuted to the next one, defined as `form_perm`. When we have that `nodup l`,
we prove that `equiv.perm.support (form_perm l) = l.to_finset`, and that
`form_perm l` is rotationally invariant, in `form_perm_rotate`.
-/
def form_perm : equiv.perm α :=
(zip_with equiv.swap l l.tail).prod
@[simp] lemma form_perm_nil : form_perm ([] : list α) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma form_perm_singleton (x : α) : form_perm [x] = 1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma form_perm_cons_cons (x y : α) (l : list α) :
form_perm (x :: y :: l) = swap x y * form_perm (y :: l) :=
prod_cons
lemma form_perm_pair (x y : α) : form_perm [x, y] = swap x y := rfl
lemma form_perm_apply_of_not_mem (x : α) (l : list α) (h : x ∉ l) :
form_perm l x = x :=
begin
cases l with y l,
{ simp },
induction l with z l IH generalizing x y,
{ simp },
{ specialize IH x z (mt (mem_cons_of_mem y) h),
simp only [not_or_distrib, mem_cons_iff] at h,
simp [IH, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne, h] }
end
lemma form_perm_apply_mem_of_mem (x : α) (l : list α) (h : x ∈ l) :
form_perm l x ∈ l :=
begin
cases l with y l,
{ simpa },
induction l with z l IH generalizing x y,
{ simpa using h },
{ by_cases hx : x ∈ z :: l,
{ rw [form_perm_cons_cons, mul_apply, swap_apply_def],
split_ifs;
simp [IH _ _ hx] },
{ replace h : x = y := or.resolve_right h hx,
simp [form_perm_apply_of_not_mem _ _ hx, ←h] } }
end
@[simp] lemma form_perm_cons_concat_apply_last (x y : α) (xs : list α) :
form_perm (x :: (xs ++ [y])) y = x :=
begin
induction xs with z xs IH generalizing x y,
{ simp },
{ simp [IH] }
end
@[simp] lemma form_perm_apply_last (x : α) (xs : list α) :
form_perm (x :: xs) ((x :: xs).last (cons_ne_nil x xs)) = x :=
begin
induction xs using list.reverse_rec_on with xs y IH generalizing x;
simp
end
@[simp] lemma form_perm_apply_nth_le_length (x : α) (xs : list α) :
form_perm (x :: xs) ((x :: xs).nth_le xs.length (by simp)) = x :=
by rw [nth_le_cons_length, form_perm_apply_last]
lemma form_perm_apply_head (x y : α) (xs : list α) (h : nodup (x :: y :: xs)) :
form_perm (x :: y :: xs) x = y :=
by simp [form_perm_apply_of_not_mem _ _ (not_mem_of_nodup_cons h)]
lemma form_perm_apply_nth_le_zero (l : list α) (h : nodup l) (hl : 1 < l.length) :
form_perm l (l.nth_le 0 (zero_lt_one.trans hl)) = l.nth_le 1 hl :=
begin
rcases l with (_|⟨x, _|⟨y, tl⟩⟩),
{ simp },
{ simp },
{ simpa using form_perm_apply_head _ _ _ h }
end
lemma form_perm_eq_head_iff_eq_last (x y : α) :
form_perm (y :: l) x = y ↔ x = last (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) :=
iff.trans (by rw form_perm_apply_last) (form_perm (y :: l)).injective.eq_iff
lemma zip_with_swap_prod_support' (l l' : list α) :
{x | (zip_with swap l l').prod x ≠ x} ≤ l.to_finset ⊔ l'.to_finset :=
begin
simp only [set.sup_eq_union, set.le_eq_subset],
induction l with y l hl generalizing l',
{ simp },
{ cases l' with z l',
{ simp },
{ intro x,
simp only [set.union_subset_iff, mem_cons_iff, zip_with_cons_cons, foldr, prod_cons,
mul_apply],
intro hx,
by_cases h : x ∈ {x | (zip_with swap l l').prod x ≠ x},
{ specialize hl l' h,
refine set.mem_union.elim hl (λ hm, _) (λ hm, _);
{ simp only [finset.coe_insert, set.mem_insert_iff, finset.mem_coe, to_finset_cons,
mem_to_finset] at hm ⊢,
simp [hm] } },
{ simp only [not_not, set.mem_set_of_eq] at h,
simp only [h, set.mem_set_of_eq] at hx,
rw swap_apply_ne_self_iff at hx,
rcases hx with ⟨hyz, rfl|rfl⟩;
simp } } }
end
lemma zip_with_swap_prod_support [fintype α] (l l' : list α) :
(zip_with swap l l').prod.support ≤ l.to_finset ⊔ l'.to_finset :=
begin
intros x hx,
have hx' : x ∈ {x | (zip_with swap l l').prod x ≠ x} := by simpa using hx,
simpa using zip_with_swap_prod_support' _ _ hx'
end
lemma support_form_perm_le' : {x | form_perm l x ≠ x} ≤ l.to_finset :=
begin
refine (zip_with_swap_prod_support' l l.tail).trans _,
simpa [finset.subset_iff] using tail_subset l
end
lemma support_form_perm_le [fintype α] : support (form_perm l) ≤ l.to_finset :=
begin
intros x hx,
have hx' : x ∈ {x | form_perm l x ≠ x} := by simpa using hx,
simpa using support_form_perm_le' _ hx'
end
lemma form_perm_apply_lt (xs : list α) (h : nodup xs) (n : ℕ) (hn : n + 1 < xs.length) :
form_perm xs (xs.nth_le n ((nat.lt_succ_self n).trans hn)) = xs.nth_le (n + 1) hn :=
begin
induction n with n IH generalizing xs,
{ simpa using form_perm_apply_nth_le_zero _ h _ },
{ rcases xs with (_|⟨x, _|⟨y, l⟩⟩),
{ simp },
{ simp },
{ specialize IH (y :: l) (nodup_of_nodup_cons h) _,
{ simpa [nat.succ_lt_succ_iff] using hn },
simp only [swap_apply_eq_iff, coe_mul, form_perm_cons_cons, nth_le],
generalize_proofs at IH,
rw [IH, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne, nth_le];
{ rintro rfl,
simpa [nth_le_mem _ _ _] using h } } }
end
lemma form_perm_apply_nth_le (xs : list α) (h : nodup xs) (n : ℕ) (hn : n < xs.length) :
form_perm xs (xs.nth_le n hn) = xs.nth_le ((n + 1) % xs.length)
(nat.mod_lt _ (n.zero_le.trans_lt hn)) :=
begin
cases xs with x xs,
{ simp },
{ have : n ≤ xs.length,
{ refine nat.le_of_lt_succ _,
simpa using hn },
rcases this.eq_or_lt with rfl|hn',
{ simp },
{ simp [form_perm_apply_lt, h, nat.mod_eq_of_lt, nat.succ_lt_succ hn'] } }
end
lemma support_form_perm_of_nodup' (l : list α) (h : nodup l) (h' : ∀ (x : α), l ≠ [x]) :
{x | form_perm l x ≠ x} = l.to_finset :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ exact support_form_perm_le' l },
{ intros x hx,
simp only [finset.mem_coe, mem_to_finset] at hx,
obtain ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩ := nth_le_of_mem hx,
rw [set.mem_set_of_eq, form_perm_apply_nth_le _ h],
intro H,
rw nodup_iff_nth_le_inj at h,
specialize h _ _ _ _ H,
cases (nat.succ_le_of_lt hn).eq_or_lt with hn' hn',
{ simp only [←hn', nat.mod_self] at h,
refine not_exists.mpr h' _,
simpa [←h, eq_comm, length_eq_one] using hn' },
{ simpa [nat.mod_eq_of_lt hn'] using h } }
end
lemma support_form_perm_of_nodup [fintype α] (l : list α) (h : nodup l) (h' : ∀ (x : α), l ≠ [x]) :
support (form_perm l) = l.to_finset :=
begin
rw ←finset.coe_inj,
convert support_form_perm_of_nodup' _ h h',
simp [set.ext_iff]
end
lemma form_perm_rotate_one (l : list α) (h : nodup l) :
form_perm (l.rotate 1) = form_perm l :=
begin
have h' : nodup (l.rotate 1),
{ simpa using h },
by_cases hl : ∀ (x : α), l ≠ [x],
{ have hl' : ∀ (x : α), l.rotate 1 ≠ [x],
{ intro,
rw [ne.def, rotate_eq_iff],
simpa using hl _ },
ext x,
by_cases hx : x ∈ l.rotate 1,
{ obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := nth_le_of_mem hx,
rw [form_perm_apply_nth_le _ h', nth_le_rotate l, nth_le_rotate l,
form_perm_apply_nth_le _ h],
simp },
{ rw [form_perm_apply_of_not_mem _ _ hx, form_perm_apply_of_not_mem],
simpa using hx } },
{ push_neg at hl,
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := hl,
simp }
end
lemma form_perm_rotate (l : list α) (h : nodup l) (n : ℕ) :
form_perm (l.rotate n) = form_perm l :=
begin
induction n with n hn,
{ simp },
{ rw [nat.succ_eq_add_one, ←rotate_rotate, form_perm_rotate_one, hn],
rwa is_rotated.nodup_iff,
exact is_rotated.forall l n }
end
lemma form_perm_eq_of_is_rotated {l l' : list α} (hd : nodup l) (h : l ~r l') :
form_perm l = form_perm l' :=
begin
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := h,
exact (form_perm_rotate l hd n).symm
end
lemma form_perm_reverse (l : list α) (h : nodup l) :
form_perm l.reverse = (form_perm l)⁻¹ :=
begin
-- Let's show `form_perm l` is an inverse to `form_perm l.reverse`.
rw [eq_comm, inv_eq_iff_mul_eq_one],
ext x,
-- We only have to check for `x ∈ l` that `form_perm l (form_perm l.reverse x)`
rw [mul_apply, one_apply],
by_cases hx : x ∈ l,
swap,
{ rw [form_perm_apply_of_not_mem x l.reverse, form_perm_apply_of_not_mem _ _ hx],
simpa using hx },
{ obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := nth_le_of_mem (mem_reverse.mpr hx),
rw [form_perm_apply_nth_le l.reverse (nodup_reverse.mpr h),
nth_le_reverse', form_perm_apply_nth_le _ h, nth_le_reverse'],
{ congr,
rw [length_reverse, ←nat.succ_le_iff, nat.succ_eq_add_one] at hk,
cases hk.eq_or_lt with hk' hk',
{ simp [←hk'] },
{ rw [length_reverse, nat.mod_eq_of_lt hk', ←nat.sub_add_comm (nat.le_pred_of_lt hk'),
nat.mod_eq_of_lt],
{ simp },
{ rw nat.sub_add_cancel,
refine sub_lt_self' _ (nat.zero_lt_succ _),
all_goals { simpa using (nat.zero_le _).trans_lt hk' } } } },
all_goals { rw [nat.sub_sub, ←length_reverse],
refine sub_lt_self' _ (zero_lt_one.trans_le (le_add_right le_rfl)),
exact k.zero_le.trans_lt hk } },
end
lemma form_perm_pow_apply_nth_le (l : list α) (h : nodup l) (n k : ℕ) (hk : k < l.length) :
(form_perm l ^ n) (l.nth_le k hk) = l.nth_le ((k + n) % l.length)
(nat.mod_lt _ (k.zero_le.trans_lt hk)) :=
begin
induction n with n hn,
{ simp [nat.mod_eq_of_lt hk] },
{ simp [pow_succ, mul_apply, hn, form_perm_apply_nth_le _ h, nat.succ_eq_add_one,
←nat.add_assoc] }
end
lemma form_perm_pow_apply_head (x : α) (l : list α) (h : nodup (x :: l)) (n : ℕ) :
(form_perm (x :: l) ^ n) x =
(x :: l).nth_le (n % (x :: l).length) (nat.mod_lt _ (nat.zero_lt_succ _)) :=
by { convert form_perm_pow_apply_nth_le _ h n 0 _; simp }
lemma form_perm_ext_iff {x y x' y' : α} {l l' : list α}
(hd : nodup (x :: y :: l)) (hd' : nodup (x' :: y' :: l')) :
form_perm (x :: y :: l) = form_perm (x' :: y' :: l') ↔ (x :: y :: l) ~r (x' :: y' :: l') :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, λ hr, form_perm_eq_of_is_rotated hd hr⟩,
rw equiv.perm.ext_iff at h,
have hx : x' ∈ (x :: y :: l),
{ have : x' ∈ {z | form_perm (x :: y :: l) z ≠ z},
{ rw [set.mem_set_of_eq, h x', form_perm_apply_head _ _ _ hd'],
simp only [mem_cons_iff, nodup_cons] at hd',
push_neg at hd',
exact hd'.left.left.symm },
simpa using support_form_perm_le' _ this },
obtain ⟨n, hn, hx'⟩ := nth_le_of_mem hx,
have hl : (x :: y :: l).length = (x' :: y' :: l').length,
{ rw [←erase_dup_eq_self.mpr hd, ←erase_dup_eq_self.mpr hd',
←card_to_finset, ←card_to_finset],
refine congr_arg finset.card _,
rw [←finset.coe_inj, ←support_form_perm_of_nodup' _ hd (by simp),
←support_form_perm_of_nodup' _ hd' (by simp)],
simp only [h] },
use n,
apply list.ext_le,
{ rw [length_rotate, hl] },
{ intros k hk hk',
rw nth_le_rotate,
induction k with k IH,
{ simp_rw [nat.zero_add, nat.mod_eq_of_lt hn],
simpa },
{ have : k.succ = (k + 1) % (x' :: y' :: l').length,
{ rw [←nat.succ_eq_add_one, nat.mod_eq_of_lt hk'] },
simp_rw this,
rw [←form_perm_apply_nth_le _ hd' k (k.lt_succ_self.trans hk'),
←IH (k.lt_succ_self.trans hk), ←h, form_perm_apply_nth_le _ hd],
congr' 1,
have h1 : 1 = 1 % (x' :: y' :: l').length := by simp,
rw [hl, nat.mod_eq_of_lt hk', h1, ←nat.add_mod, nat.succ_add] } }
end
lemma form_perm_apply_mem_eq_self_iff (hl : nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
form_perm l x = x ↔ length l ≤ 1 :=
begin
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := nth_le_of_mem hx,
rw [form_perm_apply_nth_le _ hl, hl.nth_le_inj_iff],
cases hn : l.length,
{ exact absurd k.zero_le (hk.trans_le hn.le).not_le },
{ rw hn at hk,
cases (nat.le_of_lt_succ hk).eq_or_lt with hk' hk',
{ simp [←hk', nat.succ_le_succ_iff, eq_comm] },
{ simpa [nat.mod_eq_of_lt (nat.succ_lt_succ hk'), nat.succ_lt_succ_iff]
using k.zero_le.trans_lt hk' } }
end
lemma form_perm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff (hl : nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
form_perm l x ≠ x ↔ 2 ≤ l.length :=
begin
rw [ne.def, form_perm_apply_mem_eq_self_iff _ hl x hx, not_le],
exact ⟨nat.succ_le_of_lt, nat.lt_of_succ_le⟩
end
lemma mem_of_form_perm_ne_self (l : list α) (x : α) (h : form_perm l x ≠ x) :
x ∈ l :=
begin
suffices : x ∈ {y | form_perm l y ≠ y},
{ rw ←mem_to_finset,
exact support_form_perm_le' _ this },
simpa using h
end
lemma form_perm_eq_self_of_not_mem (l : list α) (x : α) (h : x ∉ l) :
form_perm l x = x :=
by_contra (λ H, h $ mem_of_form_perm_ne_self _ _ H)
lemma form_perm_eq_one_iff (hl : nodup l) :
form_perm l = 1 ↔ l.length ≤ 1 :=
begin
cases l with hd tl,
{ simp },
{ rw ←form_perm_apply_mem_eq_self_iff _ hl hd (mem_cons_self _ _),
split,
{ simp {contextual := tt} },
{ intro h,
simp only [(hd :: tl).form_perm_apply_mem_eq_self_iff hl hd (mem_cons_self hd tl),
add_le_iff_nonpos_left, length, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, length_eq_zero] at h,
simp [h] } }
end
lemma form_perm_eq_form_perm_iff {l l' : list α} (hl : l.nodup) (hl' : l'.nodup) :
l.form_perm = l'.form_perm ↔ l ~r l' ∨ l.length ≤ 1 ∧ l'.length ≤ 1 :=
begin
rcases l with (_ | ⟨x, _ | ⟨y, l⟩⟩),
{ suffices : l'.length ≤ 1 ↔ l' = nil ∨ l'.length ≤ 1,
{ simpa [eq_comm, form_perm_eq_one_iff, hl, hl', length_eq_zero] },
refine ⟨λ h, or.inr h, _⟩,
rintro (rfl | h),
{ simp },
{ exact h } },
{ suffices : l'.length ≤ 1 ↔ [x] ~r l' ∨ l'.length ≤ 1,
{ simpa [eq_comm, form_perm_eq_one_iff, hl, hl', length_eq_zero, le_rfl] },
refine ⟨λ h, or.inr h, _⟩,
rintro (h | h),
{ simp [←h.perm.length_eq] },
{ exact h } },
{ rcases l' with (_ | ⟨x', _ | ⟨y', l'⟩⟩),
{ simp [form_perm_eq_one_iff, hl, -form_perm_cons_cons] },
{ suffices : ¬ (x :: y :: l) ~r [x'],
{ simp [form_perm_eq_one_iff, hl, -form_perm_cons_cons] },
intro h,
simpa using h.perm.length_eq },
{ simp [-form_perm_cons_cons, form_perm_ext_iff hl hl'] } }
end
lemma form_perm_gpow_apply_mem_imp_mem (l : list α) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) (n : ℤ) :
((form_perm l) ^ n) x ∈ l :=
begin
by_cases h : (l.form_perm ^ n) x = x,
{ simpa [h] using hx },
{ have : x ∈ {x | (l.form_perm ^ n) x ≠ x} := h,
rw ←set_support_apply_mem at this,
replace this := set_support_gpow_subset _ _ this,
simpa using support_form_perm_le' _ this }
end
lemma form_perm_pow_length_eq_one_of_nodup (hl : nodup l) :
(form_perm l) ^ (length l) = 1 :=
begin
ext x,
by_cases hx : x ∈ l,
{ obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := nth_le_of_mem hx,
simp [form_perm_pow_apply_nth_le _ hl, nat.mod_eq_of_lt hk] },
{ have : x ∉ {x | (l.form_perm ^ l.length) x ≠ x},
{ intros H,
refine hx _,
replace H := set_support_gpow_subset l.form_perm l.length H,
simpa using support_form_perm_le' _ H },
simpa }
end
end form_perm
end list
|
08ba072202e1b7b659440bf41daf802d4118a1c9 | 367134ba5a65885e863bdc4507601606690974c1 | /src/number_theory/primes_congruent_one.lean | 35a705b0a0c9506c160c3c01f38d94d1041fdb92 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kodyvajjha/mathlib | 9bead00e90f68269a313f45f5561766cfd8d5cad | b98af5dd79e13a38d84438b850a2e8858ec21284 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,350,366,310 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 1,615,563,062,000 | 162,666,963 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,545,367,651,000 | 1,545,367,651,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,741 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import ring_theory.polynomial.cyclotomic
import topology.algebra.polynomial
import field_theory.finite.basic
/-!
# Primes congruent to one
We prove that, for any positive `k : ℕ`, there are infinitely many primes `p` such that
`p ≡ 1 [MOD k]`.
-/
namespace nat
open polynomial nat filter
/-- For any positive `k : ℕ` there are infinitely many primes `p` such that `p ≡ 1 [MOD k]`. -/
lemma exists_prime_ge_modeq_one (k n : ℕ) (hpos : 0 < k) :
∃ (p : ℕ), nat.prime p ∧ n ≤ p ∧ p ≡ 1 [MOD k] :=
begin
have hli : tendsto (abs ∘ (λ (a : ℕ), abs(a : ℚ))) at_top at_top,
{ simp only [(∘), abs_cast],
exact nat.strict_mono_cast.monotone.tendsto_at_top_at_top exists_nat_ge },
have hcff : (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ) (cyclotomic k ℤ).leading_coeff ≠ 0,
{ simp only [cyclotomic.monic, ring_hom.eq_int_cast, monic.leading_coeff, int.cast_one, ne.def,
not_false_iff, one_ne_zero] },
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := tendsto_at_top_at_top.1 (tendsto_abv_eval₂_at_top (int.cast_ring_hom ℚ) abs
(cyclotomic k ℤ) (degree_cyclotomic_pos k ℤ hpos) hcff hli) 2,
let b := a * (k * n.factorial),
have hgt : 1 < (eval ↑(a * (k * n.factorial)) (cyclotomic k ℤ)).nat_abs,
{ suffices hgtabs : 1 < abs (eval ↑b (cyclotomic k ℤ)),
{ rw [int.abs_eq_nat_abs] at hgtabs,
exact_mod_cast hgtabs },
suffices hgtrat : 1 < abs (eval ↑b (cyclotomic k ℚ)),
{ rw [← map_cyclotomic_int k ℚ, ← int.cast_coe_nat, ← int.coe_cast_ring_hom, eval_map,
eval₂_hom, int.coe_cast_ring_hom] at hgtrat,
assumption_mod_cast },
suffices hleab : a ≤ b,
{ replace ha := lt_of_lt_of_le one_lt_two (ha b hleab),
rwa [← eval_map, map_cyclotomic_int k ℚ, abs_cast] at ha },
exact le_mul_of_pos_right (mul_pos hpos (factorial_pos n)) },
let p := min_fac (eval ↑b (cyclotomic k ℤ)).nat_abs,
letI hprime : fact p.prime := min_fac_prime (ne_of_lt hgt).symm,
have hroot : is_root (cyclotomic k (zmod p)) (cast_ring_hom (zmod p) b),
{ rw [is_root.def, ← map_cyclotomic_int k (zmod p), eval_map, coe_cast_ring_hom,
← int.cast_coe_nat, ← int.coe_cast_ring_hom, eval₂_hom, int.coe_cast_ring_hom,
zmod.int_coe_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd _ _],
apply int.dvd_nat_abs.1,
exact_mod_cast min_fac_dvd (eval ↑b (cyclotomic k ℤ)).nat_abs },
refine exists.intro p (id ⟨hprime, ⟨_, _⟩⟩),
{ by_contra habs,
exact ((prime.dvd_iff_not_coprime hprime).1 (dvd_factorial (min_fac_pos _) (le_of_not_ge habs)))
(coprime.coprime_mul_left_right (coprime.coprime_mul_left_right (coprime_of_root_cyclotomic
hpos hroot).symm)) },
{ have hdiv := order_of_dvd_of_pow_eq_one (zmod.units_pow_card_sub_one_eq_one p
(zmod.unit_of_coprime b (coprime_of_root_cyclotomic hpos hroot))),
rw [order_of_root_cyclotomic hpos ((prime.coprime_iff_not_dvd hprime).1
((coprime.coprime_mul_right_right (coprime.coprime_mul_left_right
(coprime_of_root_cyclotomic hpos hroot).symm)))) hroot] at hdiv,
exact ((modeq.modeq_iff_dvd' (le_of_lt (prime.one_lt hprime))).2 hdiv).symm }
end
lemma frequently_at_top_modeq_one (k : ℕ) (hpos : 0 < k) :
∃ᶠ p in at_top, nat.prime p ∧ p ≡ 1 [MOD k] :=
begin
refine frequently_at_top.2 (λ n, _),
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := exists_prime_ge_modeq_one k n hpos,
exact ⟨p, ⟨hp.2.1, hp.1, hp.2.2⟩⟩
end
lemma infinite_set_of_prime_modeq_one (k : ℕ) (hpos : 0 < k) :
set.infinite {p : ℕ | nat.prime p ∧ p ≡ 1 [MOD k]} :=
frequently_at_top_iff_infinite.1 (frequently_at_top_modeq_one k hpos)
end nat
|
9675f0f6b2f8d7b983d8ea31683c651b2e7ace6b | c777c32c8e484e195053731103c5e52af26a25d1 | /src/analysis/calculus/local_extr.lean | ef494a5da1bcb7e1759675feda0b93aa727e4c36 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kbuzzard/mathlib | 2ff9e85dfe2a46f4b291927f983afec17e946eb8 | 58537299e922f9c77df76cb613910914a479c1f7 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,313,702,744 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 128,185,277 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,522,920,600,000 | 1,522,920,600,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 20,675 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import analysis.calculus.deriv
import topology.algebra.order.extend_from
import topology.algebra.polynomial
/-!
# Local extrema of smooth functions
## Main definitions
In a real normed space `E` we define `pos_tangent_cone_at (s : set E) (x : E)`.
This would be the same as `tangent_cone_at ℝ≥0 s x` if we had a theory of normed semifields.
This set is used in the proof of Fermat's Theorem (see below), and can be used to formalize
[Lagrange multipliers](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange_multiplier) and/or
[Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karush–Kuhn–Tucker_conditions).
## Main statements
For each theorem name listed below,
we also prove similar theorems for `min`, `extr` (if applicable)`,
and `(f)deriv` instead of `has_fderiv`.
* `is_local_max_on.has_fderiv_within_at_nonpos` : `f' y ≤ 0` whenever `a` is a local maximum
of `f` on `s`, `f` has derivative `f'` at `a` within `s`, and `y` belongs to the positive tangent
cone of `s` at `a`.
* `is_local_max_on.has_fderiv_within_at_eq_zero` : In the settings of the previous theorem, if both
`y` and `-y` belong to the positive tangent cone, then `f' y = 0`.
* `is_local_max.has_fderiv_at_eq_zero` :
[Fermat's Theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat's_theorem_(stationary_points)),
the derivative of a differentiable function at a local extremum point equals zero.
* `exists_has_deriv_at_eq_zero` :
[Rolle's Theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolle's_theorem): given a function `f` continuous
on `[a, b]` and differentiable on `(a, b)`, there exists `c ∈ (a, b)` such that `f' c = 0`.
## Implementation notes
For each mathematical fact we prove several versions of its formalization:
* for maxima and minima;
* using `has_fderiv*`/`has_deriv*` or `fderiv*`/`deriv*`.
For the `fderiv*`/`deriv*` versions we omit the differentiability condition whenever it is possible
due to the fact that `fderiv` and `deriv` are defined to be zero for non-differentiable functions.
## References
* [Fermat's Theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat's_theorem_(stationary_points));
* [Rolle's Theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolle's_theorem);
* [Tangent cone](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tangent_cone);
## Tags
local extremum, Fermat's Theorem, Rolle's Theorem
-/
universes u v
open filter set
open_locale topology classical polynomial
section module
variables {E : Type u} [normed_add_comm_group E] [normed_space ℝ E] {f : E → ℝ} {a : E}
{f' : E →L[ℝ] ℝ}
/-- "Positive" tangent cone to `s` at `x`; the only difference from `tangent_cone_at`
is that we require `c n → ∞` instead of `‖c n‖ → ∞`. One can think about `pos_tangent_cone_at`
as `tangent_cone_at nnreal` but we have no theory of normed semifields yet. -/
def pos_tangent_cone_at (s : set E) (x : E) : set E :=
{y : E | ∃(c : ℕ → ℝ) (d : ℕ → E), (∀ᶠ n in at_top, x + d n ∈ s) ∧
(tendsto c at_top at_top) ∧ (tendsto (λn, c n • d n) at_top (𝓝 y))}
lemma pos_tangent_cone_at_mono : monotone (λ s, pos_tangent_cone_at s a) :=
begin
rintros s t hst y ⟨c, d, hd, hc, hcd⟩,
exact ⟨c, d, mem_of_superset hd $ λ h hn, hst hn, hc, hcd⟩
end
lemma mem_pos_tangent_cone_at_of_segment_subset {s : set E} {x y : E} (h : segment ℝ x y ⊆ s) :
y - x ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s x :=
begin
let c := λn:ℕ, (2:ℝ)^n,
let d := λn:ℕ, (c n)⁻¹ • (y-x),
refine ⟨c, d, filter.univ_mem' (λn, h _),
tendsto_pow_at_top_at_top_of_one_lt one_lt_two, _⟩,
show x + d n ∈ segment ℝ x y,
{ rw segment_eq_image',
refine ⟨(c n)⁻¹, ⟨_, _⟩, rfl⟩,
exacts [inv_nonneg.2 (pow_nonneg zero_le_two _),
inv_le_one (one_le_pow_of_one_le one_le_two _)] },
show tendsto (λ n, c n • d n) at_top (𝓝 (y - x)),
{ convert tendsto_const_nhds, ext n,
simp only [d, smul_smul],
rw [mul_inv_cancel, one_smul],
exact pow_ne_zero _ two_ne_zero }
end
lemma mem_pos_tangent_cone_at_of_segment_subset' {s : set E} {x y : E}
(h : segment ℝ x (x + y) ⊆ s) :
y ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s x :=
by simpa only [add_sub_cancel'] using mem_pos_tangent_cone_at_of_segment_subset h
lemma pos_tangent_cone_at_univ : pos_tangent_cone_at univ a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall $ λ x, mem_pos_tangent_cone_at_of_segment_subset' (subset_univ _)
/-- If `f` has a local max on `s` at `a`, `f'` is the derivative of `f` at `a` within `s`, and
`y` belongs to the positive tangent cone of `s` at `a`, then `f' y ≤ 0`. -/
lemma is_local_max_on.has_fderiv_within_at_nonpos {s : set E} (h : is_local_max_on f s a)
(hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s a) {y} (hy : y ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s a) :
f' y ≤ 0 :=
begin
rcases hy with ⟨c, d, hd, hc, hcd⟩,
have hc' : tendsto (λ n, ‖c n‖) at_top at_top,
from tendsto_at_top_mono (λ n, le_abs_self _) hc,
refine le_of_tendsto (hf.lim at_top hd hc' hcd) _,
replace hd : tendsto (λ n, a + d n) at_top (𝓝[s] (a + 0)),
from tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_const_nhds.add (tangent_cone_at.lim_zero _ hc' hcd),
by rwa tendsto_principal⟩,
rw [add_zero] at hd,
replace h : ∀ᶠ n in at_top, f (a + d n) ≤ f a, from mem_map.1 (hd h),
replace hc : ∀ᶠ n in at_top, 0 ≤ c n, from mem_map.1 (hc (mem_at_top (0:ℝ))),
filter_upwards [h, hc],
simp only [smul_eq_mul, mem_preimage, subset_def],
assume n hnf hn,
exact mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos hn (sub_nonpos.2 hnf)
end
/-- If `f` has a local max on `s` at `a` and `y` belongs to the positive tangent cone
of `s` at `a`, then `f' y ≤ 0`. -/
lemma is_local_max_on.fderiv_within_nonpos {s : set E} (h : is_local_max_on f s a)
{y} (hy : y ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s a) :
(fderiv_within ℝ f s a : E → ℝ) y ≤ 0 :=
if hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s a
then h.has_fderiv_within_at_nonpos hf.has_fderiv_within_at hy
else by { rw fderiv_within_zero_of_not_differentiable_within_at hf, refl }
/-- If `f` has a local max on `s` at `a`, `f'` is a derivative of `f` at `a` within `s`, and
both `y` and `-y` belong to the positive tangent cone of `s` at `a`, then `f' y ≤ 0`. -/
lemma is_local_max_on.has_fderiv_within_at_eq_zero {s : set E} (h : is_local_max_on f s a)
(hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s a) {y} (hy : y ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s a)
(hy' : -y ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s a) :
f' y = 0 :=
le_antisymm (h.has_fderiv_within_at_nonpos hf hy) $
by simpa using h.has_fderiv_within_at_nonpos hf hy'
/-- If `f` has a local max on `s` at `a` and both `y` and `-y` belong to the positive tangent cone
of `s` at `a`, then `f' y = 0`. -/
lemma is_local_max_on.fderiv_within_eq_zero {s : set E} (h : is_local_max_on f s a)
{y} (hy : y ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s a) (hy' : -y ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s a) :
(fderiv_within ℝ f s a : E → ℝ) y = 0 :=
if hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s a
then h.has_fderiv_within_at_eq_zero hf.has_fderiv_within_at hy hy'
else by { rw fderiv_within_zero_of_not_differentiable_within_at hf, refl }
/-- If `f` has a local min on `s` at `a`, `f'` is the derivative of `f` at `a` within `s`, and
`y` belongs to the positive tangent cone of `s` at `a`, then `0 ≤ f' y`. -/
lemma is_local_min_on.has_fderiv_within_at_nonneg {s : set E} (h : is_local_min_on f s a)
(hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s a) {y} (hy : y ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s a) :
0 ≤ f' y :=
by simpa using h.neg.has_fderiv_within_at_nonpos hf.neg hy
/-- If `f` has a local min on `s` at `a` and `y` belongs to the positive tangent cone
of `s` at `a`, then `0 ≤ f' y`. -/
lemma is_local_min_on.fderiv_within_nonneg {s : set E} (h : is_local_min_on f s a)
{y} (hy : y ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s a) :
(0:ℝ) ≤ (fderiv_within ℝ f s a : E → ℝ) y :=
if hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s a
then h.has_fderiv_within_at_nonneg hf.has_fderiv_within_at hy
else by { rw [fderiv_within_zero_of_not_differentiable_within_at hf], refl }
/-- If `f` has a local max on `s` at `a`, `f'` is a derivative of `f` at `a` within `s`, and
both `y` and `-y` belong to the positive tangent cone of `s` at `a`, then `f' y ≤ 0`. -/
lemma is_local_min_on.has_fderiv_within_at_eq_zero {s : set E} (h : is_local_min_on f s a)
(hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s a) {y} (hy : y ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s a)
(hy' : -y ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s a) :
f' y = 0 :=
by simpa using h.neg.has_fderiv_within_at_eq_zero hf.neg hy hy'
/-- If `f` has a local min on `s` at `a` and both `y` and `-y` belong to the positive tangent cone
of `s` at `a`, then `f' y = 0`. -/
lemma is_local_min_on.fderiv_within_eq_zero {s : set E} (h : is_local_min_on f s a)
{y} (hy : y ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s a) (hy' : -y ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s a) :
(fderiv_within ℝ f s a : E → ℝ) y = 0 :=
if hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s a
then h.has_fderiv_within_at_eq_zero hf.has_fderiv_within_at hy hy'
else by { rw fderiv_within_zero_of_not_differentiable_within_at hf, refl }
/-- **Fermat's Theorem**: the derivative of a function at a local minimum equals zero. -/
lemma is_local_min.has_fderiv_at_eq_zero (h : is_local_min f a) (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' a) :
f' = 0 :=
begin
ext y,
apply (h.on univ).has_fderiv_within_at_eq_zero hf.has_fderiv_within_at;
rw pos_tangent_cone_at_univ; apply mem_univ
end
/-- **Fermat's Theorem**: the derivative of a function at a local minimum equals zero. -/
lemma is_local_min.fderiv_eq_zero (h : is_local_min f a) : fderiv ℝ f a = 0 :=
if hf : differentiable_at ℝ f a then h.has_fderiv_at_eq_zero hf.has_fderiv_at
else fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiable_at hf
/-- **Fermat's Theorem**: the derivative of a function at a local maximum equals zero. -/
lemma is_local_max.has_fderiv_at_eq_zero (h : is_local_max f a) (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' a) :
f' = 0 :=
neg_eq_zero.1 $ h.neg.has_fderiv_at_eq_zero hf.neg
/-- **Fermat's Theorem**: the derivative of a function at a local maximum equals zero. -/
lemma is_local_max.fderiv_eq_zero (h : is_local_max f a) : fderiv ℝ f a = 0 :=
if hf : differentiable_at ℝ f a then h.has_fderiv_at_eq_zero hf.has_fderiv_at
else fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiable_at hf
/-- **Fermat's Theorem**: the derivative of a function at a local extremum equals zero. -/
lemma is_local_extr.has_fderiv_at_eq_zero (h : is_local_extr f a) :
has_fderiv_at f f' a → f' = 0 :=
h.elim is_local_min.has_fderiv_at_eq_zero is_local_max.has_fderiv_at_eq_zero
/-- **Fermat's Theorem**: the derivative of a function at a local extremum equals zero. -/
lemma is_local_extr.fderiv_eq_zero (h : is_local_extr f a) : fderiv ℝ f a = 0 :=
h.elim is_local_min.fderiv_eq_zero is_local_max.fderiv_eq_zero
end module
section real
variables {f : ℝ → ℝ} {f' : ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
/-- **Fermat's Theorem**: the derivative of a function at a local minimum equals zero. -/
lemma is_local_min.has_deriv_at_eq_zero (h : is_local_min f a) (hf : has_deriv_at f f' a) :
f' = 0 :=
by simpa using continuous_linear_map.ext_iff.1
(h.has_fderiv_at_eq_zero (has_deriv_at_iff_has_fderiv_at.1 hf)) 1
/-- **Fermat's Theorem**: the derivative of a function at a local minimum equals zero. -/
lemma is_local_min.deriv_eq_zero (h : is_local_min f a) : deriv f a = 0 :=
if hf : differentiable_at ℝ f a then h.has_deriv_at_eq_zero hf.has_deriv_at
else deriv_zero_of_not_differentiable_at hf
/-- **Fermat's Theorem**: the derivative of a function at a local maximum equals zero. -/
lemma is_local_max.has_deriv_at_eq_zero (h : is_local_max f a) (hf : has_deriv_at f f' a) :
f' = 0 :=
neg_eq_zero.1 $ h.neg.has_deriv_at_eq_zero hf.neg
/-- **Fermat's Theorem**: the derivative of a function at a local maximum equals zero. -/
lemma is_local_max.deriv_eq_zero (h : is_local_max f a) : deriv f a = 0 :=
if hf : differentiable_at ℝ f a then h.has_deriv_at_eq_zero hf.has_deriv_at
else deriv_zero_of_not_differentiable_at hf
/-- **Fermat's Theorem**: the derivative of a function at a local extremum equals zero. -/
lemma is_local_extr.has_deriv_at_eq_zero (h : is_local_extr f a) :
has_deriv_at f f' a → f' = 0 :=
h.elim is_local_min.has_deriv_at_eq_zero is_local_max.has_deriv_at_eq_zero
/-- **Fermat's Theorem**: the derivative of a function at a local extremum equals zero. -/
lemma is_local_extr.deriv_eq_zero (h : is_local_extr f a) : deriv f a = 0 :=
h.elim is_local_min.deriv_eq_zero is_local_max.deriv_eq_zero
end real
section Rolle
variables (f f' : ℝ → ℝ) {a b : ℝ}
/-- A continuous function on a closed interval with `f a = f b` takes either its maximum
or its minimum value at a point in the interior of the interval. -/
lemma exists_Ioo_extr_on_Icc (hab : a < b) (hfc : continuous_on f (Icc a b)) (hfI : f a = f b) :
∃ c ∈ Ioo a b, is_extr_on f (Icc a b) c :=
begin
have ne : (Icc a b).nonempty, from nonempty_Icc.2 (le_of_lt hab),
-- Consider absolute min and max points
obtain ⟨c, cmem, cle⟩ : ∃ c ∈ Icc a b, ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, f c ≤ f x,
from is_compact_Icc.exists_forall_le ne hfc,
obtain ⟨C, Cmem, Cge⟩ : ∃ C ∈ Icc a b, ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, f x ≤ f C,
from is_compact_Icc.exists_forall_ge ne hfc,
by_cases hc : f c = f a,
{ by_cases hC : f C = f a,
{ have : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, f x = f a,
from λ x hx, le_antisymm (hC ▸ Cge x hx) (hc ▸ cle x hx),
-- `f` is a constant, so we can take any point in `Ioo a b`
rcases exists_between hab with ⟨c', hc'⟩,
refine ⟨c', hc', or.inl _⟩,
assume x hx,
rw [mem_set_of_eq, this x hx, ← hC],
exact Cge c' ⟨le_of_lt hc'.1, le_of_lt hc'.2⟩ },
{ refine ⟨C, ⟨lt_of_le_of_ne Cmem.1 $ mt _ hC, lt_of_le_of_ne Cmem.2 $ mt _ hC⟩, or.inr Cge⟩,
exacts [λ h, by rw h, λ h, by rw [h, hfI]] } },
{ refine ⟨c, ⟨lt_of_le_of_ne cmem.1 $ mt _ hc, lt_of_le_of_ne cmem.2 $ mt _ hc⟩, or.inl cle⟩,
exacts [λ h, by rw h, λ h, by rw [h, hfI]] }
end
/-- A continuous function on a closed interval with `f a = f b` has a local extremum at some
point of the corresponding open interval. -/
lemma exists_local_extr_Ioo (hab : a < b) (hfc : continuous_on f (Icc a b)) (hfI : f a = f b) :
∃ c ∈ Ioo a b, is_local_extr f c :=
let ⟨c, cmem, hc⟩ := exists_Ioo_extr_on_Icc f hab hfc hfI
in ⟨c, cmem, hc.is_local_extr $ Icc_mem_nhds cmem.1 cmem.2⟩
/-- **Rolle's Theorem** `has_deriv_at` version -/
lemma exists_has_deriv_at_eq_zero (hab : a < b) (hfc : continuous_on f (Icc a b)) (hfI : f a = f b)
(hff' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, has_deriv_at f (f' x) x) :
∃ c ∈ Ioo a b, f' c = 0 :=
let ⟨c, cmem, hc⟩ := exists_local_extr_Ioo f hab hfc hfI in
⟨c, cmem, hc.has_deriv_at_eq_zero $ hff' c cmem⟩
/-- **Rolle's Theorem** `deriv` version -/
lemma exists_deriv_eq_zero (hab : a < b) (hfc : continuous_on f (Icc a b)) (hfI : f a = f b) :
∃ c ∈ Ioo a b, deriv f c = 0 :=
let ⟨c, cmem, hc⟩ := exists_local_extr_Ioo f hab hfc hfI in
⟨c, cmem, hc.deriv_eq_zero⟩
variables {f f'} {l : ℝ}
/-- **Rolle's Theorem**, a version for a function on an open interval: if `f` has derivative `f'`
on `(a, b)` and has the same limit `l` at `𝓝[>] a` and `𝓝[<] b`, then `f' c = 0`
for some `c ∈ (a, b)`. -/
lemma exists_has_deriv_at_eq_zero' (hab : a < b)
(hfa : tendsto f (𝓝[>] a) (𝓝 l)) (hfb : tendsto f (𝓝[<] b) (𝓝 l))
(hff' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, has_deriv_at f (f' x) x) :
∃ c ∈ Ioo a b, f' c = 0 :=
begin
have : continuous_on f (Ioo a b) := λ x hx, (hff' x hx).continuous_at.continuous_within_at,
have hcont := continuous_on_Icc_extend_from_Ioo hab.ne this hfa hfb,
obtain ⟨c, hc, hcextr⟩ : ∃ c ∈ Ioo a b, is_local_extr (extend_from (Ioo a b) f) c,
{ apply exists_local_extr_Ioo _ hab hcont,
rw eq_lim_at_right_extend_from_Ioo hab hfb,
exact eq_lim_at_left_extend_from_Ioo hab hfa },
use [c, hc],
apply (hcextr.congr _).has_deriv_at_eq_zero (hff' c hc),
rw eventually_eq_iff_exists_mem,
exact ⟨Ioo a b, Ioo_mem_nhds hc.1 hc.2, extend_from_extends this⟩
end
/-- **Rolle's Theorem**, a version for a function on an open interval: if `f` has the same limit
`l` at `𝓝[>] a` and `𝓝[<] b`, then `deriv f c = 0` for some `c ∈ (a, b)`. This version
does not require differentiability of `f` because we define `deriv f c = 0` whenever `f` is not
differentiable at `c`. -/
lemma exists_deriv_eq_zero' (hab : a < b)
(hfa : tendsto f (𝓝[>] a) (𝓝 l)) (hfb : tendsto f (𝓝[<] b) (𝓝 l)) :
∃ c ∈ Ioo a b, deriv f c = 0 :=
classical.by_cases
(assume h : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, differentiable_at ℝ f x,
show ∃ c ∈ Ioo a b, deriv f c = 0,
from exists_has_deriv_at_eq_zero' hab hfa hfb (λ x hx, (h x hx).has_deriv_at))
(assume h : ¬∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, differentiable_at ℝ f x,
have h : ∃ x, x ∈ Ioo a b ∧ ¬differentiable_at ℝ f x, by { push_neg at h, exact h },
let ⟨c, hc, hcdiff⟩ := h in ⟨c, hc, deriv_zero_of_not_differentiable_at hcdiff⟩)
end Rolle
namespace polynomial
open_locale big_operators
/-- The number of roots of a real polynomial `p` is at most the number of roots of its derivative
that are not roots of `p` plus one. -/
lemma card_roots_to_finset_le_card_roots_derivative_diff_roots_succ (p : ℝ[X]) :
p.roots.to_finset.card ≤ (p.derivative.roots.to_finset \ p.roots.to_finset).card + 1 :=
begin
cases eq_or_ne p.derivative 0 with hp' hp',
{ rw [eq_C_of_derivative_eq_zero hp', roots_C, multiset.to_finset_zero, finset.card_empty],
exact zero_le _ },
have hp : p ≠ 0, from ne_of_apply_ne derivative (by rwa [derivative_zero]),
refine finset.card_le_diff_of_interleaved (λ x hx y hy hxy hxy', _),
rw [multiset.mem_to_finset, mem_roots hp] at hx hy,
obtain ⟨z, hz1, hz2⟩ := exists_deriv_eq_zero (λ x : ℝ, eval x p) hxy
p.continuous_on (hx.trans hy.symm),
refine ⟨z, _, hz1⟩,
rwa [multiset.mem_to_finset, mem_roots hp', is_root, ← p.deriv]
end
/-- The number of roots of a real polynomial is at most the number of roots of its derivative plus
one. -/
lemma card_roots_to_finset_le_derivative (p : ℝ[X]) :
p.roots.to_finset.card ≤ p.derivative.roots.to_finset.card + 1 :=
p.card_roots_to_finset_le_card_roots_derivative_diff_roots_succ.trans $
add_le_add_right (finset.card_mono $ finset.sdiff_subset _ _) _
/-- The number of roots of a real polynomial (counted with multiplicities) is at most the number of
roots of its derivative (counted with multiplicities) plus one. -/
lemma card_roots_le_derivative (p : ℝ[X]) : p.roots.card ≤ p.derivative.roots.card + 1 :=
calc p.roots.card = ∑ x in p.roots.to_finset, p.roots.count x :
(multiset.to_finset_sum_count_eq _).symm
... = ∑ x in p.roots.to_finset, (p.roots.count x - 1 + 1) :
eq.symm $ finset.sum_congr rfl $ λ x hx, tsub_add_cancel_of_le $ nat.succ_le_iff.2 $
multiset.count_pos.2 $ multiset.mem_to_finset.1 hx
... = ∑ x in p.roots.to_finset, (p.root_multiplicity x - 1) + p.roots.to_finset.card :
by simp only [finset.sum_add_distrib, finset.card_eq_sum_ones, count_roots]
... ≤ ∑ x in p.roots.to_finset, p.derivative.root_multiplicity x +
((p.derivative.roots.to_finset \ p.roots.to_finset).card + 1) :
add_le_add
(finset.sum_le_sum $ λ x hx, root_multiplicity_sub_one_le_derivative_root_multiplicity _ _)
p.card_roots_to_finset_le_card_roots_derivative_diff_roots_succ
... ≤ ∑ x in p.roots.to_finset, p.derivative.roots.count x +
(∑ x in p.derivative.roots.to_finset \ p.roots.to_finset, p.derivative.roots.count x + 1) :
begin
simp only [← count_roots],
refine add_le_add_left (add_le_add_right ((finset.card_eq_sum_ones _).trans_le _) _) _,
refine finset.sum_le_sum (λ x hx, nat.succ_le_iff.2 $ _),
rw [multiset.count_pos, ← multiset.mem_to_finset],
exact (finset.mem_sdiff.1 hx).1
end
... = p.derivative.roots.card + 1 :
begin
rw [← add_assoc, ← finset.sum_union finset.disjoint_sdiff, finset.union_sdiff_self_eq_union,
← multiset.to_finset_sum_count_eq, ← finset.sum_subset (finset.subset_union_right _ _)],
intros x hx₁ hx₂,
simpa only [multiset.mem_to_finset, multiset.count_eq_zero] using hx₂
end
/-- The number of real roots of a polynomial is at most the number of roots of its derivative plus
one. -/
lemma card_root_set_le_derivative {F : Type*} [comm_ring F] [algebra F ℝ] (p : F[X]) :
fintype.card (p.root_set ℝ) ≤ fintype.card (p.derivative.root_set ℝ) + 1 :=
by simpa only [root_set_def, finset.coe_sort_coe, fintype.card_coe, derivative_map]
using card_roots_to_finset_le_derivative (p.map (algebra_map F ℝ))
end polynomial
|
a7405198241f4fc61ec4b655525bcdd51a7c3cd1 | 2c41ae31b2b771ad5646ad880201393f5269a7f0 | /Lean/Qualities/Satisfactory.lean | 83d312e351940cb2b6ecec408a20683f46a0bef3 | [] | no_license | kevinsullivan/Boehm | 926f25bc6f1a8b6bd47d333d936fdfc278228312 | 55208395bff20d48a598b7fa33a4d55a2447a9cf | refs/heads/master | 1,586,127,134,302 | 1,488,252,326,000 | 1,488,252,326,000 | 32,836,930 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 479 | lean | import SystemModel.System
import Qualities.Affordable
import Qualities.Resilient
/- Satisfactory -/
/-
An instance of type [SystemType] is satisfactory if, and only if,
it is both [Affordable] and [Resilient]. These
system qualities are themselves composites of lower-level system
qualities, as detailed in their respective files.
-/
inductive Satisfactory (sys_type: SystemType) : Prop
| intro : Affordable sys_type ->
Resilient sys_type ->
Satisfactory
|
4c6509114fa603c4ed5e029280106405e9787f24 | 1a61aba1b67cddccce19532a9596efe44be4285f | /hott/init/bool.hlean | 545183412e98d40e6073c25cbcd30eaa7c6f35c6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | eigengrau/lean | 07986a0f2548688c13ba36231f6cdbee82abf4c6 | f8a773be1112015e2d232661ce616d23f12874d0 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,939,198,566 | 1,441,352,386,000 | 1,441,352,494,000 | 41,903,576 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,441,352,210,000 | 1,441,352,210,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 675 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.reserved_notation
-- this is not in init.types, because that file depends on init.num,
-- which depends on these definitions
namespace bool
definition cond {A : Type} (b : bool) (t e : A) :=
bool.rec_on b e t
definition bor (a b : bool) :=
bool.rec_on a (bool.rec_on b ff tt) tt
notation a || b := bor a b
definition band (a b : bool) :=
bool.rec_on a ff (bool.rec_on b ff tt)
notation a && b := band a b
definition bnot (a : bool) :=
bool.rec_on a tt ff
end bool
|
2d3752b995c7aac6a526db27583ddb4d7f8327a1 | 624f6f2ae8b3b1adc5f8f67a365c51d5126be45a | /tmp/new-frontend/parser/module.lean | 2ced51fdb3d39a25c11232a8da4c21f75cb6b6de | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mhuisi/lean4 | 28d35a4febc2e251c7f05492e13f3b05d6f9b7af | dda44bc47f3e5d024508060dac2bcb59fd12e4c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,621,225,489,283 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 250,590,438 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,602,443,220,000 | 1,585,327,814,000 | C | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,934 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Sebastian Ullrich
Module-Level parsers
-/
prelude
import init.lean.parser.command
namespace Lean
namespace Parser
open Combinators MonadParsec
open Parser.HasTokens Parser.HasView
local postfix `?`:10000 := optional
local postfix *:10000 := Combinators.many
local postfix +:10000 := Combinators.many1
structure ModuleParserConfig extends CommandParserConfig :=
(commandParsers : TokenMap commandParser)
instance moduleParserConfigCoe : HasCoe ModuleParserConfig CommandParserConfig :=
⟨ModuleParserConfig.toCommandParserConfig⟩
section
@[derive Monad Alternative MonadReader MonadState MonadParsec MonadExcept]
def ModuleParserM := StateT ParserState $ ParserT ModuleParserConfig Id
abbrev moduleParser := ModuleParserM Syntax
end
instance ModuleParserM.liftParserT (ρ : Type) [HasLiftT ModuleParserConfig ρ] :
HasMonadLift (ParserT ρ Id) ModuleParserM :=
{ monadLift := λ α x st cfg, (λ a, (a, st)) <$> x.run ↑cfg }
section
local attribute [reducible] BasicParserM
instance ModuleParserM.BasicParserM (ρ : Type) [HasLiftT ModuleParserConfig ρ] :
HasMonadLift BasicParserM ModuleParserM :=
inferInstance
end
namespace Module
@[derive Parser.HasView Parser.HasTokens]
def prelude.Parser : basicParser :=
node! «prelude» ["prelude"]
@[derive Parser.HasView Parser.HasTokens]
def importPath.Parser : basicParser :=
-- use `raw` to ignore registered tokens like ".."
node! importPath [
dirups: (rawStr ".")*,
Module: ident.Parser]
@[derive Parser.HasView Parser.HasTokens]
def import.Parser : basicParser :=
node! «import» ["import", imports: importPath.Parser+]
@[derive Parser.HasView Parser.HasTokens]
def header.Parser : basicParser :=
node! «header» [«prelude»: prelude.Parser?, imports: import.Parser*]
@[pattern] def eoi : SyntaxNodeKind := ⟨`Lean.Parser.Module.eoi⟩
def eoi.Parser : moduleParser := do
MonadParsec.eoi,
it ← leftOver,
-- add `eoi` Node for left-over input
let stop := it.toEnd,
pure $ Syntax.mkNode eoi [Syntax.atom ⟨some ⟨⟨stop, stop⟩, stop.offset, ⟨stop, stop⟩⟩, ""⟩]
/-- Read command, recovering from errors inside commands (attach partial Syntax tree)
as well as unknown commands (skip input). -/
private def commandWrecAux : Bool → Nat → ModuleParserM (Bool × Syntax)
| recovering 0 := error "unreachable"
| recovering (Nat.succ n) := do
-- terminate at EOF
Nat.succ _ ← remaining | (Prod.mk false) <$> eoi.Parser,
(recovering, c) ← catch (do {
cfg ← read,
c ← monadLift $ command.Parser.run cfg.commandParsers,
pure (false, some c)
} <|> do {
-- unknown command: try to skip token, or else single character
when (¬ recovering) $ do {
it ← leftOver,
logMessage {expected := DList.singleton "command", it := it, custom := some ()}
},
try (monadLift token *> pure ()) <|> (any *> pure ()),
pure (true, none)
}) $ λ msg, do {
-- error inside command: log error, return partial Syntax tree
logMessage msg,
pure (true, some msg.custom.get)
},
/- NOTE: We need to make very sure that these recursive calls are happening in tail positions.
Otherwise, resuming the coroutine is linear in the number of previous commands. -/
match c with
| some c := pure (recovering, c)
| none := commandWrecAux recovering n
def parseCommandWithRecovery (recovering : Bool) :=
do { rem ← remaining, commandWrecAux recovering rem.succ }
end Module
open Module
structure ModuleParserSnapshot :=
-- it there was a parse error in the previous command, we shouldn't complain if parsing immediately after it
-- fails as well
(recovering : Bool)
(it : String.OldIterator)
-- return (partial) Syntax tree and single fatal or multiple non-fatal messages
def resumeModuleParser {α : Type} (cfg : ModuleParserConfig) (snap : ModuleParserSnapshot) (mkRes : α → Syntax × ModuleParserSnapshot)
(p : ModuleParserM α) : Syntax × Except Message (ModuleParserSnapshot × MessageLog) :=
let (r, _) := ((((Prod.mk <$> p <*> leftOver).run {messages:=MessageLog.empty}).run cfg).runFrom snap.it).run {} in
match r with
| Except.ok ((a, it), st) := let (stx, snap) := mkRes a in (stx, Except.ok ({snap with it := it}, st.messages))
| Except.error msg := (msg.custom.get, Except.error $ messageOfParsecMessage cfg msg)
def parseHeader (cfg : ModuleParserConfig) :=
let snap := {ModuleParserSnapshot . recovering := false, it := cfg.input.mkOldIterator} in
resumeModuleParser cfg snap (λ stx, (stx, snap)) $ do
-- `token` assumes that there is no leading whitespace
monadLift whitespace,
monadLift header.Parser
def parseCommand (cfg) (snap) := resumeModuleParser cfg snap (λ p, (Prod.snd p, {snap with recovering := Prod.fst p}))
(parseCommandWithRecovery snap.recovering)
end Parser
end Lean
|
151ca6d448598827ec6615371f4470b6b83414d4 | 82e44445c70db0f03e30d7be725775f122d72f3e | /src/group_theory/complement.lean | b8529e315df560fc9b0a6cc7ef2d63fb422d1a08 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | stjordanis/mathlib | 51e286d19140e3788ef2c470bc7b953e4991f0c9 | 2568d41bca08f5d6bf39d915434c8447e21f42ee | refs/heads/master | 1,631,748,053,501 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 1,627,938,886,000 | 228,728,358 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,576,630,588,000 | 1,576,630,587,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,264 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import group_theory.group_action
import group_theory.order_of_element
import group_theory.quotient_group
/-!
# Complements
In this file we define the complement of a subgroup.
## Main definitions
- `is_complement S T` where `S` and `T` are subsets of `G` states that every `g : G` can be
written uniquely as a product `s * t` for `s ∈ S`, `t ∈ T`.
- `left_transversals T` where `T` is a subset of `G` is the set of all left-complements of `T`,
i.e. the set of all `S : set G` that contain exactly one element of each left coset of `T`.
- `right_transversals S` where `S` is a subset of `G` is the set of all right-complements of `S`,
i.e. the set of all `T : set G` that contain exactly one element of each right coset of `S`.
## Main results
- `is_complement_of_coprime` : Subgroups of coprime order are complements.
- `exists_right_complement_of_coprime` : **Schur-Zassenhaus** for abelian normal subgroups:
If `H : subgroup G` is abelian, normal, and has order coprime to its index, then there exists
a subgroup `K` which is a (right) complement of `H`.
-/
open_locale big_operators
namespace subgroup
variables {G : Type*} [group G] (H K : subgroup G) (S T : set G)
/-- `S` and `T` are complements if `(*) : S × T → G` is a bijection.
This notion generalizes left transversals, right transversals, and complementary subgroups. -/
@[to_additive "`S` and `T` are complements if `(*) : S × T → G` is a bijection"]
def is_complement : Prop := function.bijective (λ x : S × T, x.1.1 * x.2.1)
/-- The set of left-complements of `T : set G` -/
@[to_additive "The set of left-complements of `T : set G`"]
def left_transversals : set (set G) := {S : set G | is_complement S T}
/-- The set of right-complements of `S : set G` -/
@[to_additive "The set of right-complements of `S : set G`"]
def right_transversals : set (set G) := {T : set G | is_complement S T}
variables {H K S T}
@[to_additive] lemma is_complement_iff_exists_unique :
is_complement S T ↔ ∀ g : G, ∃! x : S × T, x.1.1 * x.2.1 = g :=
function.bijective_iff_exists_unique _
@[to_additive] lemma is_complement.exists_unique (h : is_complement S T) (g : G) :
∃! x : S × T, x.1.1 * x.2.1 = g :=
is_complement_iff_exists_unique.mp h g
@[to_additive] lemma is_complement.symm (h : is_complement (H : set G) (K : set G)) :
is_complement (K : set G) (H : set G) :=
begin
let ϕ : H × K ≃ K × H := equiv.mk (λ x, ⟨x.2⁻¹, x.1⁻¹⟩) (λ x, ⟨x.2⁻¹, x.1⁻¹⟩)
(λ x, prod.ext (inv_inv _) (inv_inv _)) (λ x, prod.ext (inv_inv _) (inv_inv _)),
let ψ : G ≃ G := equiv.mk (λ g : G, g⁻¹) (λ g : G, g⁻¹) inv_inv inv_inv,
suffices : ψ ∘ (λ x : H × K, x.1.1 * x.2.1) = (λ x : K × H, x.1.1 * x.2.1) ∘ ϕ,
{ rwa [is_complement, ←equiv.bijective_comp, ←this, equiv.comp_bijective] },
exact funext (λ x, mul_inv_rev _ _),
end
@[to_additive] lemma is_complement_comm :
is_complement (H : set G) (K : set G) ↔ is_complement (K : set G) (H : set G) :=
⟨is_complement.symm, is_complement.symm⟩
@[to_additive] lemma mem_left_transversals_iff_exists_unique_inv_mul_mem :
S ∈ left_transversals T ↔ ∀ g : G, ∃! s : S, (s : G)⁻¹ * g ∈ T :=
begin
rw [left_transversals, set.mem_set_of_eq, is_complement_iff_exists_unique],
refine ⟨λ h g, _, λ h g, _⟩,
{ obtain ⟨x, h1, h2⟩ := h g,
exact ⟨x.1, (congr_arg (∈ T) (eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq h1)).mp x.2.2, λ y hy,
(prod.ext_iff.mp (h2 ⟨y, y⁻¹ * g, hy⟩ (mul_inv_cancel_left y g))).1⟩ },
{ obtain ⟨x, h1, h2⟩ := h g,
refine ⟨⟨x, x⁻¹ * g, h1⟩, mul_inv_cancel_left x g, λ y hy, _⟩,
have := h2 y.1 ((congr_arg (∈ T) (eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq hy)).mp y.2.2),
exact prod.ext this (subtype.ext (eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq ((congr_arg _ this).mp hy))) },
end
@[to_additive] lemma mem_right_transversals_iff_exists_unique_mul_inv_mem :
S ∈ right_transversals T ↔ ∀ g : G, ∃! s : S, g * (s : G)⁻¹ ∈ T :=
begin
rw [right_transversals, set.mem_set_of_eq, is_complement_iff_exists_unique],
refine ⟨λ h g, _, λ h g, _⟩,
{ obtain ⟨x, h1, h2⟩ := h g,
exact ⟨x.2, (congr_arg (∈ T) (eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq h1)).mp x.1.2, λ y hy,
(prod.ext_iff.mp (h2 ⟨⟨g * y⁻¹, hy⟩, y⟩ (inv_mul_cancel_right g y))).2⟩ },
{ obtain ⟨x, h1, h2⟩ := h g,
refine ⟨⟨⟨g * x⁻¹, h1⟩, x⟩, inv_mul_cancel_right g x, λ y hy, _⟩,
have := h2 y.2 ((congr_arg (∈ T) (eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq hy)).mp y.1.2),
exact prod.ext (subtype.ext (eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq ((congr_arg _ this).mp hy))) this },
end
@[to_additive] lemma mem_left_transversals_iff_exists_unique_quotient_mk'_eq :
S ∈ left_transversals (H : set G) ↔
∀ q : quotient (quotient_group.left_rel H), ∃! s : S, quotient.mk' s.1 = q :=
begin
have key : ∀ g h, quotient.mk' g = quotient.mk' h ↔ g⁻¹ * h ∈ H :=
@quotient.eq' G (quotient_group.left_rel H),
simp_rw [mem_left_transversals_iff_exists_unique_inv_mul_mem, set_like.mem_coe, ←key],
exact ⟨λ h q, quotient.induction_on' q h, λ h g, h (quotient.mk' g)⟩,
end
@[to_additive] lemma mem_right_transversals_iff_exists_unique_quotient_mk'_eq :
S ∈ right_transversals (H : set G) ↔
∀ q : quotient (quotient_group.right_rel H), ∃! s : S, quotient.mk' s.1 = q :=
begin
have key : ∀ g h, quotient.mk' g = quotient.mk' h ↔ h * g⁻¹ ∈ H :=
@quotient.eq' G (quotient_group.right_rel H),
simp_rw [mem_right_transversals_iff_exists_unique_mul_inv_mem, set_like.mem_coe, ←key],
exact ⟨λ h q, quotient.induction_on' q h, λ h g, h (quotient.mk' g)⟩,
end
@[to_additive] lemma mem_left_transversals_iff_bijective : S ∈ left_transversals (H : set G) ↔
function.bijective (S.restrict (quotient.mk' : G → quotient (quotient_group.left_rel H))) :=
mem_left_transversals_iff_exists_unique_quotient_mk'_eq.trans
(function.bijective_iff_exists_unique (S.restrict quotient.mk')).symm
@[to_additive] lemma mem_right_transversals_iff_bijective : S ∈ right_transversals (H : set G) ↔
function.bijective (set.restrict (quotient.mk' : G → quotient (quotient_group.right_rel H)) S) :=
mem_right_transversals_iff_exists_unique_quotient_mk'_eq.trans
(function.bijective_iff_exists_unique (S.restrict quotient.mk')).symm
@[to_additive] instance : inhabited (left_transversals (H : set G)) :=
⟨⟨set.range quotient.out', mem_left_transversals_iff_bijective.mpr ⟨by
{ rintros ⟨_, q₁, rfl⟩ ⟨_, q₂, rfl⟩ hg,
rw (q₁.out_eq'.symm.trans hg).trans q₂.out_eq' }, λ q, ⟨⟨q.out', q, rfl⟩, quotient.out_eq' q⟩⟩⟩⟩
@[to_additive] instance : inhabited (right_transversals (H : set G)) :=
⟨⟨set.range quotient.out', mem_right_transversals_iff_bijective.mpr ⟨by
{ rintros ⟨_, q₁, rfl⟩ ⟨_, q₂, rfl⟩ hg,
rw (q₁.out_eq'.symm.trans hg).trans q₂.out_eq' }, λ q, ⟨⟨q.out', q, rfl⟩, quotient.out_eq' q⟩⟩⟩⟩
lemma is_complement_of_disjoint [fintype G] [fintype H] [fintype K]
(h1 : fintype.card H * fintype.card K = fintype.card G)
(h2 : disjoint H K) :
is_complement (H : set G) (K : set G) :=
begin
refine (fintype.bijective_iff_injective_and_card _).mpr
⟨λ x y h, _, (fintype.card_prod H K).trans h1⟩,
rw [←eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq, ←mul_assoc, ←mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul] at h,
change ↑(x.2 * y.2⁻¹) = ↑(x.1⁻¹ * y.1) at h,
rw [prod.ext_iff, ←@inv_mul_eq_one H _ x.1 y.1, ←@mul_inv_eq_one K _ x.2 y.2, subtype.ext_iff,
subtype.ext_iff, coe_one, coe_one, h, and_self, ←mem_bot, ←h2.eq_bot, mem_inf],
exact ⟨subtype.mem ((x.1)⁻¹ * (y.1)), (congr_arg (∈ K) h).mp (subtype.mem (x.2 * (y.2)⁻¹))⟩,
end
lemma is_complement_of_coprime [fintype G] [fintype H] [fintype K]
(h1 : fintype.card H * fintype.card K = fintype.card G)
(h2 : nat.coprime (fintype.card H) (fintype.card K)) :
is_complement (H : set G) (K : set G) :=
is_complement_of_disjoint h1 (disjoint_iff.mpr (inf_eq_bot_of_coprime h2))
section schur_zassenhaus
@[to_additive] instance : mul_action G (left_transversals (H : set G)) :=
{ smul := λ g T, ⟨left_coset g T, mem_left_transversals_iff_exists_unique_inv_mul_mem.mpr (λ g', by
{ obtain ⟨t, ht1, ht2⟩ := mem_left_transversals_iff_exists_unique_inv_mul_mem.mp T.2 (g⁻¹ * g'),
simp_rw [←mul_assoc, ←mul_inv_rev] at ht1 ht2,
refine ⟨⟨g * t, mem_left_coset g t.2⟩, ht1, _⟩,
rintros ⟨_, t', ht', rfl⟩ h,
exact subtype.ext ((mul_right_inj g).mpr (subtype.ext_iff.mp (ht2 ⟨t', ht'⟩ h))) })⟩,
one_smul := λ T, subtype.ext (one_left_coset T),
mul_smul := λ g g' T, subtype.ext (left_coset_assoc ↑T g g').symm }
lemma smul_symm_apply_eq_mul_symm_apply_inv_smul
(g : G) (α : left_transversals (H : set G)) (q : quotient_group.quotient H) :
↑((equiv.of_bijective _ (mem_left_transversals_iff_bijective.mp (g • α).2)).symm q) =
g * ((equiv.of_bijective _ (mem_left_transversals_iff_bijective.mp α.2)).symm
(g⁻¹ • q : quotient_group.quotient H)) :=
begin
let w := (equiv.of_bijective _ (mem_left_transversals_iff_bijective.mp α.2)),
let y := (equiv.of_bijective _ (mem_left_transversals_iff_bijective.mp (g • α).2)),
change ↑(y.symm q) = ↑(⟨_, mem_left_coset g (subtype.mem _)⟩ : (g • α).1),
refine subtype.ext_iff.mp (y.symm_apply_eq.mpr _),
change q = g • (w (w.symm (g⁻¹ • q : quotient_group.quotient H))),
rw [equiv.apply_symm_apply, ←mul_smul, mul_inv_self, one_smul],
end
variables [is_commutative H] [fintype (quotient_group.quotient H)]
variables (α β γ : left_transversals (H : set G))
/-- The difference of two left transversals -/
@[to_additive "The difference of two left transversals"]
noncomputable def diff [hH : normal H] : H :=
let α' := (equiv.of_bijective _ (mem_left_transversals_iff_bijective.mp α.2)).symm,
β' := (equiv.of_bijective _ (mem_left_transversals_iff_bijective.mp β.2)).symm in
∏ (q : quotient_group.quotient H), ⟨(α' q) * (β' q)⁻¹,
hH.mem_comm (quotient.exact' ((β'.symm_apply_apply q).trans (α'.symm_apply_apply q).symm))⟩
@[to_additive] lemma diff_mul_diff [normal H] : diff α β * diff β γ = diff α γ :=
finset.prod_mul_distrib.symm.trans (finset.prod_congr rfl (λ x hx, subtype.ext
(by rw [coe_mul, coe_mk, coe_mk, coe_mk, mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel_left])))
@[to_additive] lemma diff_self [normal H] : diff α α = 1 :=
mul_right_eq_self.mp (diff_mul_diff α α α)
@[to_additive] lemma diff_inv [normal H]: (diff α β)⁻¹ = diff β α :=
inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one ((diff_mul_diff α β α).trans (diff_self α))
lemma smul_diff_smul [hH : normal H] (g : G) :
diff (g • α) (g • β) = ⟨g * diff α β * g⁻¹, hH.conj_mem (diff α β).1 (diff α β).2 g⟩ :=
begin
let ϕ : H →* H :=
{ to_fun := λ h, ⟨g * h * g⁻¹, hH.conj_mem h.1 h.2 g⟩,
map_one' := subtype.ext (by rw [coe_mk, coe_one, mul_one, mul_inv_self]),
map_mul' := λ h₁ h₂, subtype.ext (by rw [coe_mk, coe_mul, coe_mul, coe_mk, coe_mk, mul_assoc,
mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel_left]) },
refine eq.trans (finset.prod_bij' (λ q _, (↑g)⁻¹ * q) (λ _ _, finset.mem_univ _)
(λ q _, subtype.ext _) (λ q _, ↑g * q) (λ _ _, finset.mem_univ _)
(λ q _, mul_inv_cancel_left g q) (λ q _, inv_mul_cancel_left g q)) (ϕ.map_prod _ _).symm,
change _ * _ = g * (_ * _) * g⁻¹,
simp_rw [smul_symm_apply_eq_mul_symm_apply_inv_smul, mul_inv_rev, mul_assoc],
refl,
end
lemma smul_diff [H.normal] (h : H) :
diff (h • α) β = h ^ (fintype.card (quotient_group.quotient H)) * diff α β :=
begin
rw [diff, diff, ←finset.card_univ, ←finset.prod_const, ←finset.prod_mul_distrib],
refine finset.prod_congr rfl (λ q _, _),
rw [subtype.ext_iff, coe_mul, coe_mk, coe_mk, ←mul_assoc, mul_right_cancel_iff],
rw [show h • α = (h : G) • α, from rfl, smul_symm_apply_eq_mul_symm_apply_inv_smul],
rw [mul_left_cancel_iff, ←subtype.ext_iff, equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq, inv_smul_eq_iff],
exact self_eq_mul_left.mpr ((quotient_group.eq_one_iff _).mpr h.2),
end
variables (H)
instance setoid_diff [H.normal] : setoid (left_transversals (H : set G)) :=
setoid.mk (λ α β, diff α β = 1) ⟨λ α, diff_self α, λ α β h₁,
by rw [←diff_inv, h₁, one_inv], λ α β γ h₁ h₂, by rw [←diff_mul_diff, h₁, h₂, one_mul]⟩
/-- The quotient of the transversals of an abelian normal `N` by the `diff` relation -/
def quotient_diff [H.normal] :=
quotient H.setoid_diff
instance [H.normal] : inhabited H.quotient_diff :=
quotient.inhabited
variables {H}
instance [H.normal] : mul_action G H.quotient_diff :=
{ smul := λ g, quotient.map (λ α, g • α) (λ α β h, (smul_diff_smul α β g).trans
(subtype.ext (mul_inv_eq_one.mpr (mul_right_eq_self.mpr (subtype.ext_iff.mp h))))),
mul_smul := λ g₁ g₂ q, quotient.induction_on q (λ α, congr_arg quotient.mk (mul_smul g₁ g₂ α)),
one_smul := λ q, quotient.induction_on q (λ α, congr_arg quotient.mk (one_smul G α)) }
variables [fintype H]
lemma exists_smul_eq [H.normal] (α β : H.quotient_diff)
(hH : nat.coprime (fintype.card H) (fintype.card (quotient_group.quotient H))) :
∃ h : H, h • α = β :=
quotient.induction_on α (quotient.induction_on β
(λ β α, exists_imp_exists (λ n, quotient.sound)
⟨(pow_coprime hH).symm (diff α β)⁻¹, by
{ change diff ((_ : H) • _) _ = 1,
rw smul_diff,
change pow_coprime hH ((pow_coprime hH).symm (diff α β)⁻¹) * (diff α β) = 1,
rw [equiv.apply_symm_apply, inv_mul_self] }⟩))
lemma smul_injective [H.normal] (α : H.quotient_diff)
(hH : nat.coprime (fintype.card H) (fintype.card (quotient_group.quotient H)))
{h₁ h₂ : H} (hh : h₁ • α = h₂ • α) : h₁ = h₂ :=
begin
revert hh,
refine quotient.induction_on α (λ α hα, _),
replace hα : diff (h₁ • α) (h₂ • α) = 1 := quotient.exact hα,
rw [smul_diff, ←diff_inv, smul_diff, diff_self, mul_one, mul_inv_eq_one] at hα,
exact (pow_coprime hH).injective hα,
end
lemma is_complement_stabilizer_of_coprime [fintype G] [H.normal] {α : H.quotient_diff}
(hH : nat.coprime (fintype.card H) (fintype.card (quotient_group.quotient H))) :
is_complement (H : set G) (mul_action.stabilizer G α : set G) :=
begin
classical,
let ϕ : H ≃ mul_action.orbit G α := equiv.of_bijective (λ h, ⟨h • α, h, rfl⟩)
⟨λ h₁ h₂ hh, smul_injective α hH (subtype.ext_iff.mp hh),
λ β, exists_imp_exists (λ h hh, subtype.ext hh) (exists_smul_eq α β hH)⟩,
have key := card_eq_card_quotient_mul_card_subgroup (mul_action.stabilizer G α),
rw ← fintype.card_congr (ϕ.trans (mul_action.orbit_equiv_quotient_stabilizer G α)) at key,
apply is_complement_of_coprime key.symm,
rw [card_eq_card_quotient_mul_card_subgroup H, mul_comm, mul_right_inj'] at key,
{ rw ← key, convert hH },
{ rw [←pos_iff_ne_zero, fintype.card_pos_iff],
apply_instance },
end
/-- **Schur-Zassenhaus** for abelian normal subgroups:
If `H : subgroup G` is abelian, normal, and has order coprime to its index, then there exists
a subgroup `K` which is a (right) complement of `H`. -/
theorem exists_right_complement_of_coprime [fintype G] [H.normal]
(hH : nat.coprime (fintype.card H) (fintype.card (quotient_group.quotient H))) :
∃ K : subgroup G, is_complement (H : set G) (K : set G) :=
nonempty_of_inhabited.elim
(λ α : H.quotient_diff, ⟨mul_action.stabilizer G α, is_complement_stabilizer_of_coprime hH⟩)
/-- **Schur-Zassenhaus** for abelian normal subgroups:
If `H : subgroup G` is abelian, normal, and has order coprime to its index, then there exists
a subgroup `K` which is a (left) complement of `H`. -/
theorem exists_left_complement_of_coprime [fintype G] [H.normal]
(hH : nat.coprime (fintype.card H) (fintype.card (quotient_group.quotient H))) :
∃ K : subgroup G, is_complement (K : set G) (H : set G) :=
Exists.imp (λ _, is_complement.symm) (exists_right_complement_of_coprime hH)
end schur_zassenhaus
end subgroup
|
ebfe9587b2c96ab1613c6b68450fc233b758038a | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/server/edits.lean | 377e2306a2056b72e59a22109c853dcb0f0ac70f | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,140 | lean | import Lean.Data.Lsp
open IO Lean Lsp
def main : IO Unit := do
Ipc.runWith (←IO.appPath) #["--server"] do
let hIn ← Ipc.stdin
hIn.write (←FS.readBinFile "init_vscode_1_47_2.log")
hIn.flush
discard $ Ipc.readResponseAs 0 InitializeResult
Ipc.writeNotification ⟨"initialized", InitializedParams.mk⟩
hIn.write (←FS.readBinFile "open_content.log")
hIn.flush
discard <| Ipc.collectDiagnostics 1 "file:///test.lean" 1
hIn.write (←FS.readBinFile "content_changes.log")
hIn.flush
let diags ← Ipc.collectDiagnostics 2 "file:///test.lean" 7
if diags.isEmpty then
throw $ userError "Test failed, no diagnostics received."
else
let diag := diags.getLast!
FS.writeFile "edits_diag.json.produced" (toString <| toJson (diag : JsonRpc.Message))
if let Except.ok (refDiag : JsonRpc.Notification PublishDiagnosticsParams) :=
(Json.parse $ ←FS.readFile "edits_diag.json") >>= fromJson?
then
assert! (diag == refDiag)
else
throw $ userError "Failed parsing test file."
Ipc.shutdown 3
discard $ Ipc.waitForExit
|
4726bf028fdaa65ce6b5cc2e230ca2dd4f465ca0 | 35677d2df3f081738fa6b08138e03ee36bc33cad | /src/analysis/calculus/local_extr.lean | c1a923bfcbf29056371f51087dbe93ccdde1f03c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | gebner/mathlib | eab0150cc4f79ec45d2016a8c21750244a2e7ff0 | cc6a6edc397c55118df62831e23bfbd6e6c6b4ab | refs/heads/master | 1,625,574,853,976 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 1,586,712,827,000 | 99,101,412 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,586,716,389,000 | 1,501,667,958,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 14,847 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import topology.local_extr analysis.calculus.deriv
/-! # Local extrema of smooth functions
## Main definitions
In a real normed space `E` we define `pos_tangent_cone_at (s : set E) (x : E)`.
This would be the same as `tangent_cone_at ℝ≥0 s x` if we had a theory of normed semifields.
This set is used in the proof of Fermat's Theorem (see below), and can be used to formalize
[Lagrange multipliers](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange_multiplier) and/or
[Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karush–Kuhn–Tucker_conditions).
## Main statements
For each theorem name listed below, we also prove similar theorems for `min`, `extr` (if applicable)`,
and `(f)deriv` instead of `has_fderiv`.
* `is_local_max_on.has_fderiv_within_at_nonpos` : `f' y ≤ 0` whenever `a` is a local maximum
of `f` on `s`, `f` has derivative `f'` at `a` within `s`, and `y` belongs to the positive tangent
cone of `s` at `a`.
* `is_local_max_on.has_fderiv_within_at_eq_zero` : In the settings of the previous theorem, if both
`y` and `-y` belong to the positive tangent cone, then `f' y = 0`.
* `is_local_max.has_fderiv_at_eq_zero` :
[Fermat's Theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat's_theorem_(stationary_points)),
the derivative of a differentiable function at a local extremum point equals zero.
* `exists_has_deriv_at_eq_zero` :
[Rolle's Theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolle's_theorem): given a function `f` continuous
on `[a, b]` and differentiable on `(a, b)`, there exists `c ∈ (a, b)` such that `f' c = 0`.
## Implementation notes
For each mathematical fact we prove several versions of its formalization:
* for maxima and minima;
* using `has_fderiv*`/`has_deriv*` or `fderiv*`/`deriv*`.
For the `fderiv*`/`deriv*` versions we omit the differentiability condition whenever it is possible
due to the fact that `fderiv` and `deriv` are defined to be zero for non-differentiable functions.
## References
* [Fermat's Theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat's_theorem_(stationary_points));
* [Rolle's Theorem](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolle's_theorem);
* [Tangent cone](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tangent_cone);
## Tags
local extremum, Fermat's Theorem, Rolle's Theorem
-/
universes u v
open filter set
open_locale topological_space classical
section vector_space
variables {E : Type u} [normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E] {f : E → ℝ} {a : E}
{f' : E →L[ℝ] ℝ}
/-- "Positive" tangent cone to `s` at `x`; the only difference from `tangent_cone_at`
is that we require `c n → ∞` instead of `∥c n∥ → ∞`. One can think about `pos_tangent_cone_at`
as `tangent_cone_at nnreal` but we have no theory of normed semifields yet. -/
def pos_tangent_cone_at (s : set E) (x : E) : set E :=
{y : E | ∃(c : ℕ → ℝ) (d : ℕ → E), (∀ᶠ n in at_top, x + d n ∈ s) ∧
(tendsto c at_top at_top) ∧ (tendsto (λn, c n • d n) at_top (𝓝 y))}
lemma pos_tangent_cone_at_mono : monotone (λ s, pos_tangent_cone_at s a) :=
begin
rintros s t hst y ⟨c, d, hd, hc, hcd⟩,
exact ⟨c, d, mem_sets_of_superset hd $ λ h hn, hst hn, hc, hcd⟩
end
lemma mem_pos_tangent_cone_at_of_segment_subset {s : set E} {x y : E} (h : segment x y ⊆ s) :
y - x ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s x :=
begin
let c := λn:ℕ, (2:ℝ)^n,
let d := λn:ℕ, (c n)⁻¹ • (y-x),
refine ⟨c, d, filter.univ_mem_sets' (λn, h _), _, _⟩,
show x + d n ∈ segment x y,
{ rw segment_eq_image,
refine ⟨(c n)⁻¹, ⟨_, _⟩, _⟩,
{ rw inv_nonneg, apply pow_nonneg, norm_num },
{ apply inv_le_one, apply one_le_pow_of_one_le, norm_num },
{ simp only [d, sub_smul, smul_sub, one_smul], abel } },
show tendsto c at_top at_top,
{ exact tendsto_pow_at_top_at_top_of_gt_1 one_lt_two },
show filter.tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), c n • d n) filter.at_top (𝓝 (y - x)),
{ have : (λ (n : ℕ), c n • d n) = (λn, y - x),
{ ext n,
simp only [d, smul_smul],
rw [mul_inv_cancel, one_smul],
exact pow_ne_zero _ (by norm_num) },
rw this,
apply tendsto_const_nhds }
end
lemma pos_tangent_cone_at_univ : pos_tangent_cone_at univ a = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.2
begin
assume x,
rw [← add_sub_cancel x a],
exact mem_pos_tangent_cone_at_of_segment_subset (subset_univ _)
end
/-- If `f` has a local max on `s` at `a`, `f'` is the derivative of `f` at `a` within `s`, and
`y` belongs to the positive tangent cone of `s` at `a`, then `f' y ≤ 0`. -/
lemma is_local_max_on.has_fderiv_within_at_nonpos {s : set E} (h : is_local_max_on f s a)
(hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s a) {y} (hy : y ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s a) :
f' y ≤ 0 :=
begin
rcases hy with ⟨c, d, hd, hc, hcd⟩,
have hc' : tendsto (λ n, ∥c n∥) at_top at_top,
from tendsto_at_top_mono _ (λ n, le_abs_self _) hc,
refine le_of_tendsto at_top_ne_bot (hf.lim at_top hd hc' hcd) _,
replace hd : tendsto (λ n, a + d n) at_top (nhds_within (a + 0) s),
from tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_const_nhds.add (tangent_cone_at.lim_zero _ hc' hcd),
by rwa tendsto_principal⟩,
rw [add_zero] at hd,
replace h : ∀ᶠ n in at_top, f (a + d n) ≤ f a, from mem_map.1 (hd h),
replace hc : ∀ᶠ n in at_top, 0 ≤ c n, from mem_map.1 (hc (mem_at_top (0:ℝ))),
filter_upwards [h, hc],
simp only [mem_set_of_eq, smul_eq_mul, mem_preimage, subset_def],
assume n hnf hn,
exact mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos hn (sub_nonpos.2 hnf)
end
/-- If `f` has a local max on `s` at `a` and `y` belongs to the positive tangent cone
of `s` at `a`, then `f' y ≤ 0`. -/
lemma is_local_max_on.fderiv_within_nonpos {s : set E} (h : is_local_max_on f s a)
{y} (hy : y ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s a) :
(fderiv_within ℝ f s a : E → ℝ) y ≤ 0 :=
if hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s a
then h.has_fderiv_within_at_nonpos hf.has_fderiv_within_at hy
else by { rw fderiv_within_zero_of_not_differentiable_within_at hf, refl }
/-- If `f` has a local max on `s` at `a`, `f'` is a derivative of `f` at `a` within `s`, and
both `y` and `-y` belong to the positive tangent cone of `s` at `a`, then `f' y ≤ 0`. -/
lemma is_local_max_on.has_fderiv_within_at_eq_zero {s : set E} (h : is_local_max_on f s a)
(hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s a) {y} (hy : y ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s a)
(hy' : -y ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s a) :
f' y = 0 :=
le_antisymm (h.has_fderiv_within_at_nonpos hf hy) $
by simpa using h.has_fderiv_within_at_nonpos hf hy'
/-- If `f` has a local max on `s` at `a` and both `y` and `-y` belong to the positive tangent cone
of `s` at `a`, then `f' y = 0`. -/
lemma is_local_max_on.fderiv_within_eq_zero {s : set E} (h : is_local_max_on f s a)
{y} (hy : y ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s a) (hy' : -y ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s a) :
(fderiv_within ℝ f s a : E → ℝ) y = 0 :=
if hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s a
then h.has_fderiv_within_at_eq_zero hf.has_fderiv_within_at hy hy'
else by { rw fderiv_within_zero_of_not_differentiable_within_at hf, refl }
/-- If `f` has a local min on `s` at `a`, `f'` is the derivative of `f` at `a` within `s`, and
`y` belongs to the positive tangent cone of `s` at `a`, then `0 ≤ f' y`. -/
lemma is_local_min_on.has_fderiv_within_at_nonneg {s : set E} (h : is_local_min_on f s a)
(hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s a) {y} (hy : y ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s a) :
0 ≤ f' y :=
by simpa using h.neg.has_fderiv_within_at_nonpos hf.neg hy
/-- If `f` has a local min on `s` at `a` and `y` belongs to the positive tangent cone
of `s` at `a`, then `0 ≤ f' y`. -/
lemma is_local_min_on.fderiv_within_nonneg {s : set E} (h : is_local_min_on f s a)
{y} (hy : y ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s a) :
(0:ℝ) ≤ (fderiv_within ℝ f s a : E → ℝ) y :=
if hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s a
then h.has_fderiv_within_at_nonneg hf.has_fderiv_within_at hy
else by { rw [fderiv_within_zero_of_not_differentiable_within_at hf], refl }
/-- If `f` has a local max on `s` at `a`, `f'` is a derivative of `f` at `a` within `s`, and
both `y` and `-y` belong to the positive tangent cone of `s` at `a`, then `f' y ≤ 0`. -/
lemma is_local_min_on.has_fderiv_within_at_eq_zero {s : set E} (h : is_local_min_on f s a)
(hf : has_fderiv_within_at f f' s a) {y} (hy : y ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s a)
(hy' : -y ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s a) :
f' y = 0 :=
by simpa using h.neg.has_fderiv_within_at_eq_zero hf.neg hy hy'
/-- If `f` has a local min on `s` at `a` and both `y` and `-y` belong to the positive tangent cone
of `s` at `a`, then `f' y = 0`. -/
lemma is_local_min_on.fderiv_within_eq_zero {s : set E} (h : is_local_min_on f s a)
{y} (hy : y ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s a) (hy' : -y ∈ pos_tangent_cone_at s a) :
(fderiv_within ℝ f s a : E → ℝ) y = 0 :=
if hf : differentiable_within_at ℝ f s a
then h.has_fderiv_within_at_eq_zero hf.has_fderiv_within_at hy hy'
else by { rw fderiv_within_zero_of_not_differentiable_within_at hf, refl }
/-- Fermat's Theorem: the derivative of a function at a local minimum equals zero. -/
lemma is_local_min.has_fderiv_at_eq_zero (h : is_local_min f a) (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' a) :
f' = 0 :=
begin
ext y,
apply (h.on univ).has_fderiv_within_at_eq_zero hf.has_fderiv_within_at;
rw pos_tangent_cone_at_univ; apply mem_univ
end
/-- Fermat's Theorem: the derivative of a function at a local minimum equals zero. -/
lemma is_local_min.fderiv_eq_zero (h : is_local_min f a) : fderiv ℝ f a = 0 :=
if hf : differentiable_at ℝ f a then h.has_fderiv_at_eq_zero hf.has_fderiv_at
else fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiable_at hf
/-- Fermat's Theorem: the derivative of a function at a local maximum equals zero. -/
lemma is_local_max.has_fderiv_at_eq_zero (h : is_local_max f a) (hf : has_fderiv_at f f' a) :
f' = 0 :=
neg_eq_zero.1 $ h.neg.has_fderiv_at_eq_zero hf.neg
/-- Fermat's Theorem: the derivative of a function at a local maximum equals zero. -/
lemma is_local_max.fderiv_eq_zero (h : is_local_max f a) : fderiv ℝ f a = 0 :=
if hf : differentiable_at ℝ f a then h.has_fderiv_at_eq_zero hf.has_fderiv_at
else fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiable_at hf
/-- Fermat's Theorem: the derivative of a function at a local extremum equals zero. -/
lemma is_local_extr.has_fderiv_at_eq_zero (h : is_local_extr f a) :
has_fderiv_at f f' a → f' = 0 :=
h.elim is_local_min.has_fderiv_at_eq_zero is_local_max.has_fderiv_at_eq_zero
/-- Fermat's Theorem: the derivative of a function at a local extremum equals zero. -/
lemma is_local_extr.fderiv_eq_zero (h : is_local_extr f a) : fderiv ℝ f a = 0 :=
h.elim is_local_min.fderiv_eq_zero is_local_max.fderiv_eq_zero
end vector_space
section real
variables {f : ℝ → ℝ} {f' : ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
/-- Fermat's Theorem: the derivative of a function at a local minimum equals zero. -/
lemma is_local_min.has_deriv_at_eq_zero (h : is_local_min f a) (hf : has_deriv_at f f' a) :
f' = 0 :=
by simpa using continuous_linear_map.ext_iff.1
(h.has_fderiv_at_eq_zero (has_deriv_at_iff_has_fderiv_at.1 hf)) 1
/-- Fermat's Theorem: the derivative of a function at a local minimum equals zero. -/
lemma is_local_min.deriv_eq_zero (h : is_local_min f a) : deriv f a = 0 :=
if hf : differentiable_at ℝ f a then h.has_deriv_at_eq_zero hf.has_deriv_at
else deriv_zero_of_not_differentiable_at hf
/-- Fermat's Theorem: the derivative of a function at a local maximum equals zero. -/
lemma is_local_max.has_deriv_at_eq_zero (h : is_local_max f a) (hf : has_deriv_at f f' a) :
f' = 0 :=
neg_eq_zero.1 $ h.neg.has_deriv_at_eq_zero hf.neg
/-- Fermat's Theorem: the derivative of a function at a local maximum equals zero. -/
lemma is_local_max.deriv_eq_zero (h : is_local_max f a) : deriv f a = 0 :=
if hf : differentiable_at ℝ f a then h.has_deriv_at_eq_zero hf.has_deriv_at
else deriv_zero_of_not_differentiable_at hf
/-- Fermat's Theorem: the derivative of a function at a local extremum equals zero. -/
lemma is_local_extr.has_deriv_at_eq_zero (h : is_local_extr f a) :
has_deriv_at f f' a → f' = 0 :=
h.elim is_local_min.has_deriv_at_eq_zero is_local_max.has_deriv_at_eq_zero
/-- Fermat's Theorem: the derivative of a function at a local extremum equals zero. -/
lemma is_local_extr.deriv_eq_zero (h : is_local_extr f a) : deriv f a = 0 :=
h.elim is_local_min.deriv_eq_zero is_local_max.deriv_eq_zero
end real
section Rolle
variables (f f' : ℝ → ℝ) {a b : ℝ} (hab : a < b) (hfc : continuous_on f (Icc a b)) (hfI : f a = f b)
include hab hfc hfI
/-- A continuous function on a closed interval with `f a = f b` takes either its maximum
or its minimum value at a point in the interior of the interval. -/
lemma exists_Ioo_extr_on_Icc : ∃ c ∈ Ioo a b, is_extr_on f (Icc a b) c :=
begin
have ne : (Icc a b).nonempty, from nonempty_Icc.2 (le_of_lt hab),
-- Consider absolute min and max points
obtain ⟨c, cmem, cle⟩ : ∃ c ∈ Icc a b, ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, f c ≤ f x,
from compact_Icc.exists_forall_le ne hfc,
obtain ⟨C, Cmem, Cge⟩ : ∃ C ∈ Icc a b, ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, f x ≤ f C,
from compact_Icc.exists_forall_ge ne hfc,
by_cases hc : f c = f a,
{ by_cases hC : f C = f a,
{ have : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, f x = f a,
from λ x hx, le_antisymm (hC ▸ Cge x hx) (hc ▸ cle x hx),
-- `f` is a constant, so we can take any point in `Ioo a b`
rcases dense hab with ⟨c', hc'⟩,
refine ⟨c', hc', or.inl _⟩,
assume x hx,
rw [mem_set_of_eq, this x hx, ← hC],
exact Cge c' ⟨le_of_lt hc'.1, le_of_lt hc'.2⟩ },
{ refine ⟨C, ⟨lt_of_le_of_ne Cmem.1 $ mt _ hC, lt_of_le_of_ne Cmem.2 $ mt _ hC⟩, or.inr Cge⟩,
exacts [λ h, by rw h, λ h, by rw [h, hfI]] } },
{ refine ⟨c, ⟨lt_of_le_of_ne cmem.1 $ mt _ hc, lt_of_le_of_ne cmem.2 $ mt _ hc⟩, or.inl cle⟩,
exacts [λ h, by rw h, λ h, by rw [h, hfI]] }
end
/-- A continuous function on a closed interval with `f a = f b` has a local extremum at some
point of the corresponding open interval. -/
lemma exists_local_extr_Ioo : ∃ c ∈ Ioo a b, is_local_extr f c :=
let ⟨c, cmem, hc⟩ := exists_Ioo_extr_on_Icc f hab hfc hfI
in ⟨c, cmem, hc.is_local_extr $ mem_nhds_sets_iff.2 ⟨Ioo a b, Ioo_subset_Icc_self, is_open_Ioo, cmem⟩⟩
/-- Rolle's Theorem `has_deriv_at` version -/
lemma exists_has_deriv_at_eq_zero (hff' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, has_deriv_at f (f' x) x) :
∃ c ∈ Ioo a b, f' c = 0 :=
let ⟨c, cmem, hc⟩ := exists_local_extr_Ioo f hab hfc hfI in
⟨c, cmem, hc.has_deriv_at_eq_zero $ hff' c cmem⟩
/-- Rolle's Theorem `deriv` version -/
lemma exists_deriv_eq_zero : ∃ c ∈ Ioo a b, deriv f c = 0 :=
let ⟨c, cmem, hc⟩ := exists_local_extr_Ioo f hab hfc hfI in
⟨c, cmem, hc.deriv_eq_zero⟩
end Rolle
|
781c024520c5339273e5affd1ee33604b907ab1a | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /tests/lean/simp_out_params_ready.lean | 7aee9029e9fc838ce136948a83e4c6325131147e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 854 | lean | prelude
import init.data.int.basic
import init.meta.interactive
namespace in_param
class A (α β : Type) -- no out_param!
instance inst : A ℕ ℤ := ⟨⟩
def p (_ : Type) : Prop := false
@[simp] lemma l {α β} [A α β] : p α ↔ p β := iff.rfl
-- `simp` should fail to apply `l` here since the `β` parameter to `l` can't be inferred,
-- instead of trying to synthesize an instance `A ℕ ?m_1`, find `inst` and unify `?m_1 =?= ℤ`,
-- turning the goal into `p ℤ`
example : p ℕ := by simp
end in_param
namespace out_param
-- However, if `β` is marked as an out_param, the goal should turn into `p ℤ`
class A (α : Type) (β : out_param Type) -- no out_param!
instance inst : A ℕ ℤ := ⟨⟩
def p (_ : Type) : Prop := false
@[simp] lemma l {α β} [A α β] : p α ↔ p β := iff.rfl
example : p ℕ := by simp
end out_param
|
8aa39338e7a2d2c9827c68b689668f57c7d8f70d | 94e33a31faa76775069b071adea97e86e218a8ee | /src/measure_theory/integral/bochner.lean | 504473b3158e3ba8628634c12207f1a60d6fe6c3 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | urkud/mathlib | eab80095e1b9f1513bfb7f25b4fa82fa4fd02989 | 6379d39e6b5b279df9715f8011369a301b634e41 | refs/heads/master | 1,658,425,342,662 | 1,658,078,703,000 | 1,658,078,703,000 | 186,910,338 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,512,083,000 | 1,557,958,709,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 72,279 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import measure_theory.integral.set_to_l1
import analysis.normed_space.bounded_linear_maps
import topology.sequences
/-!
# Bochner integral
The Bochner integral extends the definition of the Lebesgue integral to functions that map from a
measure space into a Banach space (complete normed vector space). It is constructed here by
extending the integral on simple functions.
## Main definitions
The Bochner integral is defined through the extension process described in the file `set_to_L1`,
which follows these steps:
1. Define the integral of the indicator of a set. This is `weighted_smul μ s x = (μ s).to_real * x`.
`weighted_smul μ` is shown to be linear in the value `x` and `dominated_fin_meas_additive`
(defined in the file `set_to_L1`) with respect to the set `s`.
2. Define the integral on simple functions of the type `simple_func α E` (notation : `α →ₛ E`)
where `E` is a real normed space. (See `simple_func.integral` for details.)
3. Transfer this definition to define the integral on `L1.simple_func α E` (notation :
`α →₁ₛ[μ] E`), see `L1.simple_func.integral`. Show that this integral is a continuous linear
map from `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` to `E`.
4. Define the Bochner integral on L1 functions by extending the integral on integrable simple
functions `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` using `continuous_linear_map.extend` and the fact that the embedding of
`α →₁ₛ[μ] E` into `α →₁[μ] E` is dense.
5. Define the Bochner integral on functions as the Bochner integral of its equivalence class in L1
space, if it is in L1, and 0 otherwise.
The result of that construction is `∫ a, f a ∂μ`, which is definitionally equal to
`set_to_fun (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul μ) f`. Some basic properties of the integral
(like linearity) are particular cases of the properties of `set_to_fun` (which are described in the
file `set_to_L1`).
## Main statements
1. Basic properties of the Bochner integral on functions of type `α → E`, where `α` is a measure
space and `E` is a real normed space.
* `integral_zero` : `∫ 0 ∂μ = 0`
* `integral_add` : `∫ x, f x + g x ∂μ = ∫ x, f ∂μ + ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `integral_neg` : `∫ x, - f x ∂μ = - ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_sub` : `∫ x, f x - g x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ - ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `integral_smul` : `∫ x, r • f x ∂μ = r • ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_congr_ae` : `f =ᵐ[μ] g → ∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `norm_integral_le_integral_norm` : `∥∫ x, f x ∂μ∥ ≤ ∫ x, ∥f x∥ ∂μ`
2. Basic properties of the Bochner integral on functions of type `α → ℝ`, where `α` is a measure
space.
* `integral_nonneg_of_ae` : `0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f → 0 ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_nonpos_of_ae` : `f ≤ᵐ[μ] 0 → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ 0`
* `integral_mono_ae` : `f ≤ᵐ[μ] g → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `integral_nonneg` : `0 ≤ f → 0 ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_nonpos` : `f ≤ 0 → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ 0`
* `integral_mono` : `f ≤ᵐ[μ] g → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
3. Propositions connecting the Bochner integral with the integral on `ℝ≥0∞`-valued functions,
which is called `lintegral` and has the notation `∫⁻`.
* `integral_eq_lintegral_max_sub_lintegral_min` : `∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f⁺ x ∂μ - ∫⁻ x, f⁻ x ∂μ`,
where `f⁺` is the positive part of `f` and `f⁻` is the negative part of `f`.
* `integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae` : `0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f → ∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`
4. `tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence` : the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem
5. (In the file `set_integral`) integration commutes with continuous linear maps.
* `continuous_linear_map.integral_comp_comm`
* `linear_isometry.integral_comp_comm`
## Notes
Some tips on how to prove a proposition if the API for the Bochner integral is not enough so that
you need to unfold the definition of the Bochner integral and go back to simple functions.
One method is to use the theorem `integrable.induction` in the file `simple_func_dense_lp` (or one
of the related results, like `Lp.induction` for functions in `Lp`), which allows you to prove
something for an arbitrary integrable function.
Another method is using the following steps.
See `integral_eq_lintegral_max_sub_lintegral_min` for a complicated example, which proves that
`∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻`, with the first integral sign being the Bochner integral of a real-valued
function `f : α → ℝ`, and second and third integral sign being the integral on `ℝ≥0∞`-valued
functions (called `lintegral`). The proof of `integral_eq_lintegral_max_sub_lintegral_min` is
scattered in sections with the name `pos_part`.
Here are the usual steps of proving that a property `p`, say `∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻`, holds for all
functions :
1. First go to the `L¹` space.
For example, if you see `ennreal.to_real (∫⁻ a, ennreal.of_real $ ∥f a∥)`, that is the norm of
`f` in `L¹` space. Rewrite using `L1.norm_of_fun_eq_lintegral_norm`.
2. Show that the set `{f ∈ L¹ | ∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻}` is closed in `L¹` using `is_closed_eq`.
3. Show that the property holds for all simple functions `s` in `L¹` space.
Typically, you need to convert various notions to their `simple_func` counterpart, using lemmas
like `L1.integral_coe_eq_integral`.
4. Since simple functions are dense in `L¹`,
```
univ = closure {s simple}
= closure {s simple | ∫ s = ∫⁻ s⁺ - ∫⁻ s⁻} : the property holds for all simple functions
⊆ closure {f | ∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻}
= {f | ∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻} : closure of a closed set is itself
```
Use `is_closed_property` or `dense_range.induction_on` for this argument.
## Notations
* `α →ₛ E` : simple functions (defined in `measure_theory/integration`)
* `α →₁[μ] E` : functions in L1 space, i.e., equivalence classes of integrable functions (defined in
`measure_theory/lp_space`)
* `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` : simple functions in L1 space, i.e., equivalence classes of integrable simple
functions (defined in `measure_theory/simple_func_dense`)
* `∫ a, f a ∂μ` : integral of `f` with respect to a measure `μ`
* `∫ a, f a` : integral of `f` with respect to `volume`, the default measure on the ambient type
We also define notations for integral on a set, which are described in the file
`measure_theory/set_integral`.
Note : `ₛ` is typed using `\_s`. Sometimes it shows as a box if the font is missing.
## Tags
Bochner integral, simple function, function space, Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale topological_space big_operators nnreal ennreal measure_theory
open set filter topological_space ennreal emetric
namespace measure_theory
variables {α E F 𝕜 : Type*}
section weighted_smul
open continuous_linear_map
variables [normed_group F] [normed_space ℝ F] {m : measurable_space α} {μ : measure α}
/-- Given a set `s`, return the continuous linear map `λ x, (μ s).to_real • x`. The extension of
that set function through `set_to_L1` gives the Bochner integral of L1 functions. -/
def weighted_smul {m : measurable_space α} (μ : measure α) (s : set α) : F →L[ℝ] F :=
(μ s).to_real • (continuous_linear_map.id ℝ F)
lemma weighted_smul_apply {m : measurable_space α} (μ : measure α) (s : set α) (x : F) :
weighted_smul μ s x = (μ s).to_real • x :=
by simp [weighted_smul]
@[simp] lemma weighted_smul_zero_measure {m : measurable_space α} :
weighted_smul (0 : measure α) = (0 : set α → F →L[ℝ] F) :=
by { ext1, simp [weighted_smul], }
@[simp] lemma weighted_smul_empty {m : measurable_space α} (μ : measure α) :
weighted_smul μ ∅ = (0 : F →L[ℝ] F) :=
by { ext1 x, rw [weighted_smul_apply], simp, }
lemma weighted_smul_add_measure {m : measurable_space α} (μ ν : measure α) {s : set α}
(hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (hνs : ν s ≠ ∞) :
(weighted_smul (μ + ν) s : F →L[ℝ] F) = weighted_smul μ s + weighted_smul ν s :=
begin
ext1 x,
push_cast,
simp_rw [pi.add_apply, weighted_smul_apply],
push_cast,
rw [pi.add_apply, ennreal.to_real_add hμs hνs, add_smul],
end
lemma weighted_smul_smul_measure {m : measurable_space α} (μ : measure α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) {s : set α} :
(weighted_smul (c • μ) s : F →L[ℝ] F) = c.to_real • weighted_smul μ s :=
begin
ext1 x,
push_cast,
simp_rw [pi.smul_apply, weighted_smul_apply],
push_cast,
simp_rw [pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, to_real_mul, smul_smul],
end
lemma weighted_smul_congr (s t : set α) (hst : μ s = μ t) :
(weighted_smul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F) = weighted_smul μ t :=
by { ext1 x, simp_rw weighted_smul_apply, congr' 2, }
lemma weighted_smul_null {s : set α} (h_zero : μ s = 0) : (weighted_smul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F) = 0 :=
by { ext1 x, rw [weighted_smul_apply, h_zero], simp, }
lemma weighted_smul_union' (s t : set α) (ht : measurable_set t)
(hs_finite : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht_finite : μ t ≠ ∞) (h_inter : s ∩ t = ∅) :
(weighted_smul μ (s ∪ t) : F →L[ℝ] F) = weighted_smul μ s + weighted_smul μ t :=
begin
ext1 x,
simp_rw [add_apply, weighted_smul_apply,
measure_union (set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr h_inter) ht,
ennreal.to_real_add hs_finite ht_finite, add_smul],
end
@[nolint unused_arguments]
lemma weighted_smul_union (s t : set α) (hs : measurable_set s) (ht : measurable_set t)
(hs_finite : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht_finite : μ t ≠ ∞) (h_inter : s ∩ t = ∅) :
(weighted_smul μ (s ∪ t) : F →L[ℝ] F) = weighted_smul μ s + weighted_smul μ t :=
weighted_smul_union' s t ht hs_finite ht_finite h_inter
lemma weighted_smul_smul [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 F] [smul_comm_class ℝ 𝕜 F]
(c : 𝕜) (s : set α) (x : F) :
weighted_smul μ s (c • x) = c • weighted_smul μ s x :=
by { simp_rw [weighted_smul_apply, smul_comm], }
lemma norm_weighted_smul_le (s : set α) : ∥(weighted_smul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F)∥ ≤ (μ s).to_real :=
calc ∥(weighted_smul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F)∥ = ∥(μ s).to_real∥ * ∥continuous_linear_map.id ℝ F∥ :
norm_smul _ _
... ≤ ∥(μ s).to_real∥ : (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left norm_id_le (norm_nonneg _)).trans (mul_one _).le
... = abs (μ s).to_real : real.norm_eq_abs _
... = (μ s).to_real : abs_eq_self.mpr ennreal.to_real_nonneg
lemma dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul {m : measurable_space α} (μ : measure α) :
dominated_fin_meas_additive μ (weighted_smul μ : set α → F →L[ℝ] F) 1 :=
⟨weighted_smul_union, λ s _ _, (norm_weighted_smul_le s).trans (one_mul _).symm.le⟩
lemma weighted_smul_nonneg (s : set α) (x : ℝ) (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ weighted_smul μ s x :=
begin
simp only [weighted_smul, algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, coe_smul', id.def, coe_id', pi.smul_apply],
exact mul_nonneg to_real_nonneg hx,
end
end weighted_smul
local infixr ` →ₛ `:25 := simple_func
namespace simple_func
section pos_part
variables [linear_order E] [has_zero E] [measurable_space α]
/-- Positive part of a simple function. -/
def pos_part (f : α →ₛ E) : α →ₛ E := f.map (λ b, max b 0)
/-- Negative part of a simple function. -/
def neg_part [has_neg E] (f : α →ₛ E) : α →ₛ E := pos_part (-f)
lemma pos_part_map_norm (f : α →ₛ ℝ) : (pos_part f).map norm = pos_part f :=
by { ext, rw [map_apply, real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg], exact le_max_right _ _ }
lemma neg_part_map_norm (f : α →ₛ ℝ) : (neg_part f).map norm = neg_part f :=
by { rw neg_part, exact pos_part_map_norm _ }
lemma pos_part_sub_neg_part (f : α →ₛ ℝ) : f.pos_part - f.neg_part = f :=
begin
simp only [pos_part, neg_part],
ext a,
rw coe_sub,
exact max_zero_sub_eq_self (f a)
end
end pos_part
section integral
/-!
### The Bochner integral of simple functions
Define the Bochner integral of simple functions of the type `α →ₛ β` where `β` is a normed group,
and prove basic property of this integral.
-/
open finset
variables [normed_group E] [normed_group F] [normed_space ℝ F] {p : ℝ≥0∞}
{G F' : Type*} [normed_group G] [normed_group F'] [normed_space ℝ F']
{m : measurable_space α} {μ : measure α}
/-- Bochner integral of simple functions whose codomain is a real `normed_space`.
This is equal to `∑ x in f.range, (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})).to_real • x` (see `integral_eq`). -/
def integral {m : measurable_space α} (μ : measure α) (f : α →ₛ F) : F :=
f.set_to_simple_func (weighted_smul μ)
lemma integral_def {m : measurable_space α} (μ : measure α) (f : α →ₛ F) :
f.integral μ = f.set_to_simple_func (weighted_smul μ) := rfl
lemma integral_eq {m : measurable_space α} (μ : measure α) (f : α →ₛ F) :
f.integral μ = ∑ x in f.range, (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})).to_real • x :=
by simp [integral, set_to_simple_func, weighted_smul_apply]
lemma integral_eq_sum_filter [decidable_pred (λ x : F, x ≠ 0)] {m : measurable_space α} (f : α →ₛ F)
(μ : measure α) :
f.integral μ = ∑ x in f.range.filter (λ x, x ≠ 0), (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})).to_real • x :=
by { rw [integral_def, set_to_simple_func_eq_sum_filter], simp_rw weighted_smul_apply, congr }
/-- The Bochner integral is equal to a sum over any set that includes `f.range` (except `0`). -/
lemma integral_eq_sum_of_subset [decidable_pred (λ x : F, x ≠ 0)] {f : α →ₛ F} {s : finset F}
(hs : f.range.filter (λ x, x ≠ 0) ⊆ s) : f.integral μ = ∑ x in s, (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})).to_real • x :=
begin
rw [simple_func.integral_eq_sum_filter, finset.sum_subset hs],
rintro x - hx, rw [finset.mem_filter, not_and_distrib, ne.def, not_not] at hx,
rcases hx with hx|rfl; [skip, simp],
rw [simple_func.mem_range] at hx, rw [preimage_eq_empty]; simp [set.disjoint_singleton_left, hx]
end
@[simp] lemma integral_const {m : measurable_space α} (μ : measure α) (y : F) :
(const α y).integral μ = (μ univ).to_real • y :=
by classical; calc (const α y).integral μ = ∑ z in {y}, (μ ((const α y) ⁻¹' {z})).to_real • z :
integral_eq_sum_of_subset $ (filter_subset _ _).trans (range_const_subset _ _)
... = (μ univ).to_real • y : by simp
@[simp] lemma integral_piecewise_zero {m : measurable_space α} (f : α →ₛ F) (μ : measure α)
{s : set α} (hs : measurable_set s) :
(piecewise s hs f 0).integral μ = f.integral (μ.restrict s) :=
begin
classical,
refine (integral_eq_sum_of_subset _).trans
((sum_congr rfl $ λ y hy, _).trans (integral_eq_sum_filter _ _).symm),
{ intros y hy,
simp only [mem_filter, mem_range, coe_piecewise, coe_zero, piecewise_eq_indicator,
mem_range_indicator] at *,
rcases hy with ⟨⟨rfl, -⟩|⟨x, hxs, rfl⟩, h₀⟩,
exacts [(h₀ rfl).elim, ⟨set.mem_range_self _, h₀⟩] },
{ dsimp,
rw [set.piecewise_eq_indicator, indicator_preimage_of_not_mem,
measure.restrict_apply (f.measurable_set_preimage _)],
exact λ h₀, (mem_filter.1 hy).2 (eq.symm h₀) }
end
/-- Calculate the integral of `g ∘ f : α →ₛ F`, where `f` is an integrable function from `α` to `E`
and `g` is a function from `E` to `F`. We require `g 0 = 0` so that `g ∘ f` is integrable. -/
lemma map_integral (f : α →ₛ E) (g : E → F) (hf : integrable f μ) (hg : g 0 = 0) :
(f.map g).integral μ = ∑ x in f.range, (ennreal.to_real (μ (f ⁻¹' {x}))) • (g x) :=
map_set_to_simple_func _ weighted_smul_union hf hg
/-- `simple_func.integral` and `simple_func.lintegral` agree when the integrand has type
`α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞`. But since `ℝ≥0∞` is not a `normed_space`, we need some form of coercion.
See `integral_eq_lintegral` for a simpler version. -/
lemma integral_eq_lintegral' {f : α →ₛ E} {g : E → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : integrable f μ) (hg0 : g 0 = 0)
(ht : ∀ b, g b ≠ ∞) :
(f.map (ennreal.to_real ∘ g)).integral μ = ennreal.to_real (∫⁻ a, g (f a) ∂μ) :=
begin
have hf' : f.fin_meas_supp μ := integrable_iff_fin_meas_supp.1 hf,
simp only [← map_apply g f, lintegral_eq_lintegral],
rw [map_integral f _ hf, map_lintegral, ennreal.to_real_sum],
{ refine finset.sum_congr rfl (λb hb, _),
rw [smul_eq_mul, to_real_mul, mul_comm] },
{ assume a ha,
by_cases a0 : a = 0,
{ rw [a0, hg0, zero_mul], exact with_top.zero_ne_top },
{ apply mul_ne_top (ht a) (hf'.meas_preimage_singleton_ne_zero a0).ne } },
{ simp [hg0] }
end
variables [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 E] [normed_space ℝ E] [smul_comm_class ℝ 𝕜 E]
lemma integral_congr {f g : α →ₛ E} (hf : integrable f μ) (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
f.integral μ = g.integral μ :=
set_to_simple_func_congr (weighted_smul μ) (λ s hs, weighted_smul_null) weighted_smul_union hf h
/-- `simple_func.bintegral` and `simple_func.integral` agree when the integrand has type
`α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞`. But since `ℝ≥0∞` is not a `normed_space`, we need some form of coercion. -/
lemma integral_eq_lintegral {f : α →ₛ ℝ} (hf : integrable f μ) (h_pos : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
f.integral μ = ennreal.to_real (∫⁻ a, ennreal.of_real (f a) ∂μ) :=
begin
have : f =ᵐ[μ] f.map (ennreal.to_real ∘ ennreal.of_real) :=
h_pos.mono (λ a h, (ennreal.to_real_of_real h).symm),
rw [← integral_eq_lintegral' hf],
exacts [integral_congr hf this, ennreal.of_real_zero, λ b, ennreal.of_real_ne_top]
end
lemma integral_add {f g : α →ₛ E} (hf : integrable f μ) (hg : integrable g μ) :
integral μ (f + g) = integral μ f + integral μ g :=
set_to_simple_func_add _ weighted_smul_union hf hg
lemma integral_neg {f : α →ₛ E} (hf : integrable f μ) : integral μ (-f) = - integral μ f :=
set_to_simple_func_neg _ weighted_smul_union hf
lemma integral_sub {f g : α →ₛ E} (hf : integrable f μ) (hg : integrable g μ) :
integral μ (f - g) = integral μ f - integral μ g :=
set_to_simple_func_sub _ weighted_smul_union hf hg
lemma integral_smul (c : 𝕜) {f : α →ₛ E} (hf : integrable f μ) :
integral μ (c • f) = c • integral μ f :=
set_to_simple_func_smul _ weighted_smul_union weighted_smul_smul c hf
lemma norm_set_to_simple_func_le_integral_norm (T : set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C : ℝ}
(hT_norm : ∀ s, measurable_set s → μ s < ∞ → ∥T s∥ ≤ C * (μ s).to_real) {f : α →ₛ E}
(hf : integrable f μ) :
∥f.set_to_simple_func T∥ ≤ C * (f.map norm).integral μ :=
calc ∥f.set_to_simple_func T∥
≤ C * ∑ x in f.range, ennreal.to_real (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})) * ∥x∥ :
norm_set_to_simple_func_le_sum_mul_norm_of_integrable T hT_norm f hf
... = C * (f.map norm).integral μ : by { rw map_integral f norm hf norm_zero, simp_rw smul_eq_mul, }
lemma norm_integral_le_integral_norm (f : α →ₛ E) (hf : integrable f μ) :
∥f.integral μ∥ ≤ (f.map norm).integral μ :=
begin
refine (norm_set_to_simple_func_le_integral_norm _ (λ s _ _, _) hf).trans (one_mul _).le,
exact (norm_weighted_smul_le s).trans (one_mul _).symm.le,
end
lemma integral_add_measure {ν} (f : α →ₛ E) (hf : integrable f (μ + ν)) :
f.integral (μ + ν) = f.integral μ + f.integral ν :=
begin
simp_rw [integral_def],
refine set_to_simple_func_add_left' (weighted_smul μ) (weighted_smul ν) (weighted_smul (μ + ν))
(λ s hs hμνs, _) hf,
rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top, measure.coe_add, pi.add_apply, ennreal.add_ne_top] at hμνs,
rw weighted_smul_add_measure _ _ hμνs.1 hμνs.2,
end
end integral
end simple_func
namespace L1
open ae_eq_fun Lp.simple_func Lp
variables [normed_group E] [normed_group F] {m : measurable_space α} {μ : measure α}
variables {α E μ}
namespace simple_func
lemma norm_eq_integral (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : ∥f∥ = ((to_simple_func f).map norm).integral μ :=
begin
rw [norm_eq_sum_mul f, (to_simple_func f).map_integral norm (simple_func.integrable f) norm_zero],
simp_rw smul_eq_mul,
end
section pos_part
/-- Positive part of a simple function in L1 space. -/
def pos_part (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ := ⟨Lp.pos_part (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ),
begin
rcases f with ⟨f, s, hsf⟩,
use s.pos_part,
simp only [subtype.coe_mk, Lp.coe_pos_part, ← hsf, ae_eq_fun.pos_part_mk, simple_func.pos_part,
simple_func.coe_map, mk_eq_mk],
end ⟩
/-- Negative part of a simple function in L1 space. -/
def neg_part (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ := pos_part (-f)
@[norm_cast]
lemma coe_pos_part (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : (pos_part f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) = Lp.pos_part (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) := rfl
@[norm_cast]
lemma coe_neg_part (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : (neg_part f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) = Lp.neg_part (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) := rfl
end pos_part
section simple_func_integral
/-!
### The Bochner integral of `L1`
Define the Bochner integral on `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` by extension from the simple functions `α →₁ₛ[μ] E`,
and prove basic properties of this integral. -/
variables [normed_field 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 E] [normed_space ℝ E] [smul_comm_class ℝ 𝕜 E]
{F' : Type*} [normed_group F'] [normed_space ℝ F']
local attribute [instance] simple_func.normed_space
/-- The Bochner integral over simple functions in L1 space. -/
def integral (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : E := ((to_simple_func f)).integral μ
lemma integral_eq_integral (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : integral f = ((to_simple_func f)).integral μ := rfl
lemma integral_eq_lintegral {f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ} (h_pos : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] (to_simple_func f)) :
integral f = ennreal.to_real (∫⁻ a, ennreal.of_real ((to_simple_func f) a) ∂μ) :=
by rw [integral, simple_func.integral_eq_lintegral (simple_func.integrable f) h_pos]
lemma integral_eq_set_to_L1s (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : integral f = set_to_L1s (weighted_smul μ) f := rfl
lemma integral_congr {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E} (h : to_simple_func f =ᵐ[μ] to_simple_func g) :
integral f = integral g :=
simple_func.integral_congr (simple_func.integrable f) h
lemma integral_add (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : integral (f + g) = integral f + integral g :=
set_to_L1s_add _ (λ _ _, weighted_smul_null) weighted_smul_union _ _
lemma integral_smul (c : 𝕜) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
integral (c • f) = c • integral f :=
set_to_L1s_smul _ (λ _ _, weighted_smul_null) weighted_smul_union weighted_smul_smul c f
lemma norm_integral_le_norm (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : ∥integral f∥ ≤ ∥f∥ :=
begin
rw [integral, norm_eq_integral],
exact (to_simple_func f).norm_integral_le_integral_norm (simple_func.integrable f)
end
variables {E' : Type*} [normed_group E'] [normed_space ℝ E'] [normed_space 𝕜 E']
variables (α E μ 𝕜)
/-- The Bochner integral over simple functions in L1 space as a continuous linear map. -/
def integral_clm' : (α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[𝕜] E :=
linear_map.mk_continuous ⟨integral, integral_add, integral_smul⟩
1 (λf, le_trans (norm_integral_le_norm _) $ by rw one_mul)
/-- The Bochner integral over simple functions in L1 space as a continuous linear map over ℝ. -/
def integral_clm : (α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[ℝ] E := integral_clm' α E ℝ μ
variables {α E μ 𝕜}
local notation `Integral` := integral_clm α E μ
open continuous_linear_map
lemma norm_Integral_le_one : ∥Integral∥ ≤ 1 :=
linear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le _ (zero_le_one) _
section pos_part
lemma pos_part_to_simple_func (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) :
to_simple_func (pos_part f) =ᵐ[μ] (to_simple_func f).pos_part :=
begin
have eq : ∀ a, (to_simple_func f).pos_part a = max ((to_simple_func f) a) 0 := λa, rfl,
have ae_eq : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, to_simple_func (pos_part f) a = max ((to_simple_func f) a) 0,
{ filter_upwards [to_simple_func_eq_to_fun (pos_part f), Lp.coe_fn_pos_part (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ),
to_simple_func_eq_to_fun f] with _ _ h₂ _,
convert h₂, },
refine ae_eq.mono (assume a h, _),
rw [h, eq],
end
lemma neg_part_to_simple_func (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) :
to_simple_func (neg_part f) =ᵐ[μ] (to_simple_func f).neg_part :=
begin
rw [simple_func.neg_part, measure_theory.simple_func.neg_part],
filter_upwards [pos_part_to_simple_func (-f), neg_to_simple_func f],
assume a h₁ h₂,
rw h₁,
show max _ _ = max _ _,
rw h₂,
refl
end
lemma integral_eq_norm_pos_part_sub (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) :
integral f = ∥pos_part f∥ - ∥neg_part f∥ :=
begin
-- Convert things in `L¹` to their `simple_func` counterpart
have ae_eq₁ : (to_simple_func f).pos_part =ᵐ[μ] (to_simple_func (pos_part f)).map norm,
{ filter_upwards [pos_part_to_simple_func f] with _ h,
rw [simple_func.map_apply, h],
conv_lhs { rw [← simple_func.pos_part_map_norm, simple_func.map_apply] } },
-- Convert things in `L¹` to their `simple_func` counterpart
have ae_eq₂ : (to_simple_func f).neg_part =ᵐ[μ] (to_simple_func (neg_part f)).map norm,
{ filter_upwards [neg_part_to_simple_func f] with _ h,
rw [simple_func.map_apply, h],
conv_lhs { rw [← simple_func.neg_part_map_norm, simple_func.map_apply], }, },
-- Convert things in `L¹` to their `simple_func` counterpart
have ae_eq : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, (to_simple_func f).pos_part a - (to_simple_func f).neg_part a =
(to_simple_func (pos_part f)).map norm a - (to_simple_func (neg_part f)).map norm a,
{ filter_upwards [ae_eq₁, ae_eq₂] with _ h₁ h₂,
rw [h₁, h₂], },
rw [integral, norm_eq_integral, norm_eq_integral, ← simple_func.integral_sub],
{ show (to_simple_func f).integral μ =
((to_simple_func (pos_part f)).map norm - (to_simple_func (neg_part f)).map norm).integral μ,
apply measure_theory.simple_func.integral_congr (simple_func.integrable f),
filter_upwards [ae_eq₁, ae_eq₂] with _ h₁ h₂,
show _ = _ - _,
rw [← h₁, ← h₂],
have := (to_simple_func f).pos_part_sub_neg_part,
conv_lhs {rw ← this},
refl, },
{ exact (simple_func.integrable f).pos_part.congr ae_eq₁ },
{ exact (simple_func.integrable f).neg_part.congr ae_eq₂ }
end
end pos_part
end simple_func_integral
end simple_func
open simple_func
local notation `Integral` := @integral_clm α E _ _ _ _ _ μ _
variables [normed_space ℝ E] [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
[smul_comm_class ℝ 𝕜 E] [normed_space ℝ F] [complete_space E]
section integration_in_L1
local attribute [instance] simple_func.normed_space
open continuous_linear_map
variables (𝕜)
/-- The Bochner integral in L1 space as a continuous linear map. -/
def integral_clm' : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[𝕜] E :=
(integral_clm' α E 𝕜 μ).extend
(coe_to_Lp α E 𝕜) (simple_func.dense_range one_ne_top) simple_func.uniform_inducing
variables {𝕜}
/-- The Bochner integral in L1 space as a continuous linear map over ℝ. -/
def integral_clm : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] E := integral_clm' ℝ
/-- The Bochner integral in L1 space -/
def integral (f : α →₁[μ] E) : E := integral_clm f
lemma integral_eq (f : α →₁[μ] E) : integral f = integral_clm f := rfl
lemma integral_eq_set_to_L1 (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
integral f = set_to_L1 (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul μ) f :=
rfl
@[norm_cast] lemma simple_func.integral_L1_eq_integral (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
integral (f : α →₁[μ] E) = (simple_func.integral f) :=
set_to_L1_eq_set_to_L1s_clm (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul μ) f
variables (α E)
@[simp] lemma integral_zero : integral (0 : α →₁[μ] E) = 0 :=
map_zero integral_clm
variables {α E}
lemma integral_add (f g : α →₁[μ] E) : integral (f + g) = integral f + integral g :=
map_add integral_clm f g
lemma integral_neg (f : α →₁[μ] E) : integral (-f) = - integral f :=
map_neg integral_clm f
lemma integral_sub (f g : α →₁[μ] E) : integral (f - g) = integral f - integral g :=
map_sub integral_clm f g
lemma integral_smul (c : 𝕜) (f : α →₁[μ] E) : integral (c • f) = c • integral f :=
show (integral_clm' 𝕜) (c • f) = c • (integral_clm' 𝕜) f, from map_smul (integral_clm' 𝕜) c f
local notation `Integral` := @integral_clm α E _ _ μ _ _
local notation `sIntegral` := @simple_func.integral_clm α E _ _ μ _
lemma norm_Integral_le_one : ∥Integral∥ ≤ 1 :=
norm_set_to_L1_le (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul μ) zero_le_one
lemma norm_integral_le (f : α →₁[μ] E) : ∥integral f∥ ≤ ∥f∥ :=
calc ∥integral f∥ = ∥Integral f∥ : rfl
... ≤ ∥Integral∥ * ∥f∥ : le_op_norm _ _
... ≤ 1 * ∥f∥ : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right norm_Integral_le_one $ norm_nonneg _
... = ∥f∥ : one_mul _
@[continuity]
lemma continuous_integral : continuous (λ (f : α →₁[μ] E), integral f) :=
L1.integral_clm.continuous
section pos_part
lemma integral_eq_norm_pos_part_sub (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) :
integral f = ∥Lp.pos_part f∥ - ∥Lp.neg_part f∥ :=
begin
-- Use `is_closed_property` and `is_closed_eq`
refine @is_closed_property _ _ _ (coe : (α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) → (α →₁[μ] ℝ))
(λ f : α →₁[μ] ℝ, integral f = ∥Lp.pos_part f∥ - ∥Lp.neg_part f∥)
(simple_func.dense_range one_ne_top) (is_closed_eq _ _) _ f,
{ exact cont _ },
{ refine continuous.sub (continuous_norm.comp Lp.continuous_pos_part)
(continuous_norm.comp Lp.continuous_neg_part) },
-- Show that the property holds for all simple functions in the `L¹` space.
{ assume s,
norm_cast,
exact simple_func.integral_eq_norm_pos_part_sub _ }
end
end pos_part
end integration_in_L1
end L1
/-!
## The Bochner integral on functions
Define the Bochner integral on functions generally to be the `L1` Bochner integral, for integrable
functions, and 0 otherwise; prove its basic properties.
-/
variables [normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E] [complete_space E]
[nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜] [normed_space 𝕜 E] [smul_comm_class ℝ 𝕜 E]
[normed_group F] [normed_space ℝ F] [complete_space F]
section
open_locale classical
/-- The Bochner integral -/
def integral {m : measurable_space α} (μ : measure α) (f : α → E) : E :=
if hf : integrable f μ then L1.integral (hf.to_L1 f) else 0
end
/-! In the notation for integrals, an expression like `∫ x, g ∥x∥ ∂μ` will not be parsed correctly,
and needs parentheses. We do not set the binding power of `r` to `0`, because then
`∫ x, f x = 0` will be parsed incorrectly. -/
notation `∫` binders `, ` r:(scoped:60 f, f) ` ∂` μ:70 := integral μ r
notation `∫` binders `, ` r:(scoped:60 f, integral volume f) := r
notation `∫` binders ` in ` s `, ` r:(scoped:60 f, f) ` ∂` μ:70 := integral (measure.restrict μ s) r
notation `∫` binders ` in ` s `, ` r:(scoped:60 f, integral (measure.restrict volume s) f) := r
section properties
open continuous_linear_map measure_theory.simple_func
variables {f g : α → E} {m : measurable_space α} {μ : measure α}
lemma integral_eq (f : α → E) (hf : integrable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = L1.integral (hf.to_L1 f) :=
@dif_pos _ (id _) hf _ _ _
lemma integral_eq_set_to_fun (f : α → E) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = set_to_fun μ (weighted_smul μ) (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul μ) f :=
rfl
lemma L1.integral_eq_integral (f : α →₁[μ] E) : L1.integral f = ∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
(L1.set_to_fun_eq_set_to_L1 (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul μ) f).symm
lemma integral_undef (h : ¬ integrable f μ) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ = 0 :=
@dif_neg _ (id _) h _ _ _
lemma integral_non_ae_strongly_measurable (h : ¬ ae_strongly_measurable f μ) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ = 0 :=
integral_undef $ not_and_of_not_left _ h
variables (α E)
lemma integral_zero : ∫ a : α, (0:E) ∂μ = 0 :=
set_to_fun_zero (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul μ)
@[simp] lemma integral_zero' : integral μ (0 : α → E) = 0 :=
integral_zero α E
variables {α E}
lemma integral_add (hf : integrable f μ) (hg : integrable g μ) :
∫ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ + ∫ a, g a ∂μ :=
set_to_fun_add (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul μ) hf hg
lemma integral_add' (hf : integrable f μ) (hg : integrable g μ) :
∫ a, (f + g) a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ + ∫ a, g a ∂μ :=
integral_add hf hg
lemma integral_finset_sum {ι} (s : finset ι) {f : ι → α → E} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, integrable (f i) μ) :
∫ a, ∑ i in s, f i a ∂μ = ∑ i in s, ∫ a, f i a ∂μ :=
set_to_fun_finset_sum (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul _) s hf
lemma integral_neg (f : α → E) : ∫ a, -f a ∂μ = - ∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
set_to_fun_neg (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul μ) f
lemma integral_neg' (f : α → E) : ∫ a, (-f) a ∂μ = - ∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
integral_neg f
lemma integral_sub (hf : integrable f μ) (hg : integrable g μ) :
∫ a, f a - g a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ - ∫ a, g a ∂μ :=
set_to_fun_sub (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul μ) hf hg
lemma integral_sub' (hf : integrable f μ) (hg : integrable g μ) :
∫ a, (f - g) a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ - ∫ a, g a ∂μ :=
integral_sub hf hg
lemma integral_smul (c : 𝕜) (f : α → E) :
∫ a, c • (f a) ∂μ = c • ∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
set_to_fun_smul (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul μ) weighted_smul_smul c f
lemma integral_mul_left (r : ℝ) (f : α → ℝ) : ∫ a, r * (f a) ∂μ = r * ∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
integral_smul r f
lemma integral_mul_right (r : ℝ) (f : α → ℝ) : ∫ a, (f a) * r ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ * r :=
by { simp only [mul_comm], exact integral_mul_left r f }
lemma integral_div (r : ℝ) (f : α → ℝ) : ∫ a, (f a) / r ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ / r :=
integral_mul_right r⁻¹ f
lemma integral_congr_ae (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ = ∫ a, g a ∂μ :=
set_to_fun_congr_ae (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul μ) h
@[simp] lemma L1.integral_of_fun_eq_integral {f : α → E} (hf : integrable f μ) :
∫ a, (hf.to_L1 f) a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
set_to_fun_to_L1 (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul μ) hf
@[continuity]
lemma continuous_integral : continuous (λ (f : α →₁[μ] E), ∫ a, f a ∂μ) :=
continuous_set_to_fun (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul μ)
lemma norm_integral_le_lintegral_norm (f : α → E) :
∥∫ a, f a ∂μ∥ ≤ ennreal.to_real (∫⁻ a, (ennreal.of_real ∥f a∥) ∂μ) :=
begin
by_cases hf : integrable f μ,
{ rw [integral_eq f hf, ← integrable.norm_to_L1_eq_lintegral_norm f hf],
exact L1.norm_integral_le _ },
{ rw [integral_undef hf, norm_zero], exact to_real_nonneg }
end
lemma ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm (f : α → E) :
(∥∫ a, f a ∂μ∥₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ∫⁻ a, ∥f a∥₊ ∂μ :=
by { simp_rw [← of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm], apply ennreal.of_real_le_of_le_to_real,
exact norm_integral_le_lintegral_norm f }
lemma integral_eq_zero_of_ae {f : α → E} (hf : f =ᵐ[μ] 0) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ = 0 :=
by simp [integral_congr_ae hf, integral_zero]
/-- If `f` has finite integral, then `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ` is absolutely continuous in `s`: it tends
to zero as `μ s` tends to zero. -/
lemma has_finite_integral.tendsto_set_integral_nhds_zero {ι} {f : α → E}
(hf : has_finite_integral f μ) {l : filter ι} {s : ι → set α} (hs : tendsto (μ ∘ s) l (𝓝 0)) :
tendsto (λ i, ∫ x in s i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 0) :=
begin
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero],
simp_rw [← coe_nnnorm, ← nnreal.coe_zero, nnreal.tendsto_coe, ← ennreal.tendsto_coe,
ennreal.coe_zero],
exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le tendsto_const_nhds
(tendsto_set_lintegral_zero (ne_of_lt hf) hs) (λ i, zero_le _)
(λ i, ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm _)
end
/-- If `f` is integrable, then `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ` is absolutely continuous in `s`: it tends
to zero as `μ s` tends to zero. -/
lemma integrable.tendsto_set_integral_nhds_zero {ι} {f : α → E}
(hf : integrable f μ) {l : filter ι} {s : ι → set α} (hs : tendsto (μ ∘ s) l (𝓝 0)) :
tendsto (λ i, ∫ x in s i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 0) :=
hf.2.tendsto_set_integral_nhds_zero hs
/-- If `F i → f` in `L1`, then `∫ x, F i x ∂μ → ∫ x, f x ∂μ`. -/
lemma tendsto_integral_of_L1 {ι} (f : α → E) (hfi : integrable f μ)
{F : ι → α → E} {l : filter ι} (hFi : ∀ᶠ i in l, integrable (F i) μ)
(hF : tendsto (λ i, ∫⁻ x, ∥F i x - f x∥₊ ∂μ) l (𝓝 0)) :
tendsto (λ i, ∫ x, F i x ∂μ) l (𝓝 $ ∫ x, f x ∂μ) :=
tendsto_set_to_fun_of_L1 (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul μ) f hfi hFi hF
/-- Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem provides sufficient conditions under which almost
everywhere convergence of a sequence of functions implies the convergence of their integrals.
We could weaken the condition `bound_integrable` to require `has_finite_integral bound μ` instead
(i.e. not requiring that `bound` is measurable), but in all applications proving integrability
is easier. -/
theorem tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence {F : ℕ → α → E} {f : α → E} (bound : α → ℝ)
(F_measurable : ∀ n, ae_strongly_measurable (F n) μ)
(bound_integrable : integrable bound μ)
(h_bound : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∥F n a∥ ≤ bound a)
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, tendsto (λ n, F n a) at_top (𝓝 (f a))) :
tendsto (λn, ∫ a, F n a ∂μ) at_top (𝓝 $ ∫ a, f a ∂μ) :=
tendsto_set_to_fun_of_dominated_convergence (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul μ) bound
F_measurable bound_integrable h_bound h_lim
/-- Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem for filters with a countable basis -/
lemma tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence {ι} {l : filter ι}
[l.is_countably_generated]
{F : ι → α → E} {f : α → E} (bound : α → ℝ)
(hF_meas : ∀ᶠ n in l, ae_strongly_measurable (F n) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∥F n a∥ ≤ bound a)
(bound_integrable : integrable bound μ)
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, tendsto (λ n, F n a) l (𝓝 (f a))) :
tendsto (λn, ∫ a, F n a ∂μ) l (𝓝 $ ∫ a, f a ∂μ) :=
tendsto_set_to_fun_filter_of_dominated_convergence (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul μ)
bound hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_lim
/-- Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem for series. -/
lemma has_sum_integral_of_dominated_convergence {ι} [encodable ι]
{F : ι → α → E} {f : α → E} (bound : ι → α → ℝ)
(hF_meas : ∀ n, ae_strongly_measurable (F n) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∥F n a∥ ≤ bound n a)
(bound_summable : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, summable (λ n, bound n a))
(bound_integrable : integrable (λ a, ∑' n, bound n a) μ)
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, has_sum (λ n, F n a) (f a)) :
has_sum (λn, ∫ a, F n a ∂μ) (∫ a, f a ∂μ) :=
begin
have hb_nonneg : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ n, 0 ≤ bound n a :=
eventually_countable_forall.2 (λ n, (h_bound n).mono $ λ a, (norm_nonneg _).trans),
have hb_le_tsum : ∀ n, bound n ≤ᵐ[μ] (λ a, ∑' n, bound n a),
{ intro n,
filter_upwards [hb_nonneg, bound_summable] with _ ha0 ha_sum
using le_tsum ha_sum _ (λ i _, ha0 i) },
have hF_integrable : ∀ n, integrable (F n) μ,
{ refine λ n, bound_integrable.mono' (hF_meas n) _,
exact eventually_le.trans (h_bound n) (hb_le_tsum n) },
simp only [has_sum, ← integral_finset_sum _ (λ n _, hF_integrable n)],
refine tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence (λ a, ∑' n, bound n a) _ _
bound_integrable h_lim,
{ exact eventually_of_forall (λ s, s.ae_strongly_measurable_sum $ λ n hn, hF_meas n) },
{ refine eventually_of_forall (λ s, _),
filter_upwards [eventually_countable_forall.2 h_bound, hb_nonneg, bound_summable]
with a hFa ha0 has,
calc ∥∑ n in s, F n a∥ ≤ ∑ n in s, bound n a : norm_sum_le_of_le _ (λ n hn, hFa n)
... ≤ ∑' n, bound n a : sum_le_tsum _ (λ n hn, ha0 n) has },
end
variables {X : Type*} [topological_space X] [first_countable_topology X]
lemma continuous_at_of_dominated {F : X → α → E} {x₀ : X} {bound : α → ℝ}
(hF_meas : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ae_strongly_measurable (F x) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∥F x a∥ ≤ bound a)
(bound_integrable : integrable bound μ) (h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, continuous_at (λ x, F x a) x₀) :
continuous_at (λ x, ∫ a, F x a ∂μ) x₀ :=
continuous_at_set_to_fun_of_dominated (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul μ) hF_meas h_bound
bound_integrable h_cont
lemma continuous_of_dominated {F : X → α → E} {bound : α → ℝ}
(hF_meas : ∀ x, ae_strongly_measurable (F x) μ) (h_bound : ∀ x, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∥F x a∥ ≤ bound a)
(bound_integrable : integrable bound μ) (h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, continuous (λ x, F x a)) :
continuous (λ x, ∫ a, F x a ∂μ) :=
continuous_set_to_fun_of_dominated (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul μ) hF_meas h_bound
bound_integrable h_cont
/-- The Bochner integral of a real-valued function `f : α → ℝ` is the difference between the
integral of the positive part of `f` and the integral of the negative part of `f`. -/
lemma integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part {f : α → ℝ} (hf : integrable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ =
ennreal.to_real (∫⁻ a, (ennreal.of_real $ f a) ∂μ) -
ennreal.to_real (∫⁻ a, (ennreal.of_real $ - f a) ∂μ) :=
let f₁ := hf.to_L1 f in
-- Go to the `L¹` space
have eq₁ : ennreal.to_real (∫⁻ a, (ennreal.of_real $ f a) ∂μ) = ∥Lp.pos_part f₁∥ :=
begin
rw L1.norm_def,
congr' 1,
apply lintegral_congr_ae,
filter_upwards [Lp.coe_fn_pos_part f₁, hf.coe_fn_to_L1] with _ h₁ h₂,
rw [h₁, h₂, ennreal.of_real],
congr' 1,
apply nnreal.eq,
rw real.nnnorm_of_nonneg (le_max_right _ _),
simp only [real.coe_to_nnreal', subtype.coe_mk],
end,
-- Go to the `L¹` space
have eq₂ : ennreal.to_real (∫⁻ a, (ennreal.of_real $ - f a) ∂μ) = ∥Lp.neg_part f₁∥ :=
begin
rw L1.norm_def,
congr' 1,
apply lintegral_congr_ae,
filter_upwards [Lp.coe_fn_neg_part f₁, hf.coe_fn_to_L1] with _ h₁ h₂,
rw [h₁, h₂, ennreal.of_real],
congr' 1,
apply nnreal.eq,
simp only [real.coe_to_nnreal', coe_nnnorm, nnnorm_neg],
rw [real.norm_of_nonpos (min_le_right _ _), ← max_neg_neg, neg_zero],
end,
begin
rw [eq₁, eq₂, integral, dif_pos],
exact L1.integral_eq_norm_pos_part_sub _
end
lemma integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae
{f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) (hfm : ae_strongly_measurable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = ennreal.to_real (∫⁻ a, (ennreal.of_real $ f a) ∂μ) :=
begin
by_cases hfi : integrable f μ,
{ rw integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part hfi,
have h_min : ∫⁻ a, ennreal.of_real (-f a) ∂μ = 0,
{ rw lintegral_eq_zero_iff',
{ refine hf.mono _,
simp only [pi.zero_apply],
assume a h,
simp only [h, neg_nonpos, of_real_eq_zero], },
{ exact measurable_of_real.comp_ae_measurable hfm.ae_measurable.neg } },
rw [h_min, zero_to_real, _root_.sub_zero] },
{ rw integral_undef hfi,
simp_rw [integrable, hfm, has_finite_integral_iff_norm, lt_top_iff_ne_top, ne.def, true_and,
not_not] at hfi,
have : ∫⁻ (a : α), ennreal.of_real (f a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, (ennreal.of_real ∥f a∥) ∂μ,
{ refine lintegral_congr_ae (hf.mono $ assume a h, _),
rw [real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg h] },
rw [this, hfi], refl }
end
lemma integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm {G} [normed_group G]
{f : α → G} (hf : ae_strongly_measurable f μ) :
∫ x, ∥f x∥ ∂μ = ennreal.to_real ∫⁻ x, ∥f x∥₊ ∂μ :=
begin
rw integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae _ hf.norm,
{ simp_rw [of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm], },
{ refine ae_of_all _ _, simp_rw [pi.zero_apply, norm_nonneg, imp_true_iff] },
end
lemma of_real_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm {G} [normed_group G] {f : α → G}
(hf : integrable f μ) :
ennreal.of_real ∫ x, ∥f x∥ ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, ∥f x∥₊ ∂μ :=
by rw [integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm hf.ae_strongly_measurable,
ennreal.of_real_to_real (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mp hf.2)]
lemma integral_eq_integral_pos_part_sub_integral_neg_part {f : α → ℝ} (hf : integrable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = (∫ a, real.to_nnreal (f a) ∂μ) - (∫ a, real.to_nnreal (-f a) ∂μ) :=
begin
rw [← integral_sub hf.real_to_nnreal],
{ simp },
{ exact hf.neg.real_to_nnreal }
end
lemma integral_nonneg_of_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : 0 ≤ ∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
set_to_fun_nonneg (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul μ)
(λ s _ _, weighted_smul_nonneg s) hf
lemma lintegral_coe_eq_integral (f : α → ℝ≥0) (hfi : integrable (λ x, (f x : ℝ)) μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ennreal.of_real ∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
begin
simp_rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae (eventually_of_forall (λ x, (f x).coe_nonneg))
hfi.ae_strongly_measurable, ← ennreal.coe_nnreal_eq], rw [ennreal.of_real_to_real],
rw [← lt_top_iff_ne_top], convert hfi.has_finite_integral, ext1 x, rw [nnreal.nnnorm_eq]
end
lemma of_real_integral_eq_lintegral_of_real {f : α → ℝ} (hfi : integrable f μ) (f_nn : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
ennreal.of_real (∫ x, f x ∂μ) = ∫⁻ x, ennreal.of_real (f x) ∂μ :=
begin
simp_rw [integral_congr_ae (show f =ᵐ[μ] λ x, ∥f x∥,
by { filter_upwards [f_nn] with x hx,
rw [real.norm_eq_abs, abs_eq_self.mpr hx], }),
of_real_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm hfi, ←of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm],
apply lintegral_congr_ae,
filter_upwards [f_nn] with x hx,
exact congr_arg ennreal.of_real (by rw [real.norm_eq_abs, abs_eq_self.mpr hx]),
end
lemma integral_to_real {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfm : ae_measurable f μ) (hf : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < ∞) :
∫ a, (f a).to_real ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ).to_real :=
begin
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae _ hfm.ennreal_to_real.ae_strongly_measurable],
{ rw lintegral_congr_ae, refine hf.mp (eventually_of_forall _),
intros x hx, rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top] at hx, simp [hx] },
{ exact (eventually_of_forall $ λ x, ennreal.to_real_nonneg) }
end
lemma lintegral_coe_le_coe_iff_integral_le {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hfi : integrable (λ x, (f x : ℝ)) μ)
{b : ℝ≥0} :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ b ↔ ∫ a, (f a : ℝ) ∂μ ≤ b :=
by rw [lintegral_coe_eq_integral f hfi, ennreal.of_real, ennreal.coe_le_coe,
real.to_nnreal_le_iff_le_coe]
lemma integral_coe_le_of_lintegral_coe_le {f : α → ℝ≥0} {b : ℝ≥0} (h : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ b) :
∫ a, (f a : ℝ) ∂μ ≤ b :=
begin
by_cases hf : integrable (λ a, (f a : ℝ)) μ,
{ exact (lintegral_coe_le_coe_iff_integral_le hf).1 h },
{ rw integral_undef hf, exact b.2 }
end
lemma integral_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ ∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
integral_nonneg_of_ae $ eventually_of_forall hf
lemma integral_nonpos_of_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : f ≤ᵐ[μ] 0) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ 0 :=
begin
have hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] (-f) := hf.mono (assume a h, by rwa [pi.neg_apply, pi.zero_apply, neg_nonneg]),
have : 0 ≤ ∫ a, -f a ∂μ := integral_nonneg_of_ae hf,
rwa [integral_neg, neg_nonneg] at this,
end
lemma integral_nonpos {f : α → ℝ} (hf : f ≤ 0) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ 0 :=
integral_nonpos_of_ae $ eventually_of_forall hf
lemma integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) (hfi : integrable f μ) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
by simp_rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae hf hfi.1, ennreal.to_real_eq_zero_iff,
lintegral_eq_zero_iff' (ennreal.measurable_of_real.comp_ae_measurable hfi.1.ae_measurable),
← ennreal.not_lt_top, ← has_finite_integral_iff_of_real hf, hfi.2, not_true, or_false,
← hf.le_iff_eq, filter.eventually_eq, filter.eventually_le, (∘), pi.zero_apply,
ennreal.of_real_eq_zero]
lemma integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ f) (hfi : integrable f μ) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae (eventually_of_forall hf) hfi
lemma integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) (hfi : integrable f μ) :
(0 < ∫ x, f x ∂μ) ↔ 0 < μ (function.support f) :=
by simp_rw [(integral_nonneg_of_ae hf).lt_iff_ne, pos_iff_ne_zero, ne.def, @eq_comm ℝ 0,
integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae hf hfi, filter.eventually_eq, ae_iff, pi.zero_apply,
function.support]
lemma integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ f) (hfi : integrable f μ) :
(0 < ∫ x, f x ∂μ) ↔ 0 < μ (function.support f) :=
integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae (eventually_of_forall hf) hfi
section normed_group
variables {H : Type*} [normed_group H]
lemma L1.norm_eq_integral_norm (f : α →₁[μ] H) : ∥f∥ = ∫ a, ∥f a∥ ∂μ :=
begin
simp only [snorm, snorm', ennreal.one_to_real, ennreal.rpow_one, Lp.norm_def,
if_false, ennreal.one_ne_top, one_ne_zero, _root_.div_one],
rw integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae (eventually_of_forall (by simp [norm_nonneg]))
(Lp.ae_strongly_measurable f).norm,
simp [of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
end
lemma L1.norm_of_fun_eq_integral_norm {f : α → H} (hf : integrable f μ) :
∥hf.to_L1 f∥ = ∫ a, ∥f a∥ ∂μ :=
begin
rw L1.norm_eq_integral_norm,
refine integral_congr_ae _,
apply hf.coe_fn_to_L1.mono,
intros a ha,
simp [ha]
end
lemma mem_ℒp.snorm_eq_integral_rpow_norm {f : α → H} {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hp1 : p ≠ 0) (hp2 : p ≠ ∞)
(hf : mem_ℒp f p μ) :
snorm f p μ = ennreal.of_real ((∫ a, ∥f a∥ ^ p.to_real ∂μ) ^ (p.to_real ⁻¹)) :=
begin
have A : ∫⁻ (a : α), ennreal.of_real (∥f a∥ ^ p.to_real) ∂μ = ∫⁻ (a : α), ∥f a∥₊ ^ p.to_real ∂μ,
{ apply lintegral_congr (λ x, _),
rw [← of_real_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) to_real_nonneg, of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm] },
simp only [snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm hp1 hp2, one_div],
rw integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae, rotate,
{ exact eventually_of_forall (λ x, real.rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _) },
{ exact (hf.ae_strongly_measurable.norm.ae_measurable.pow_const _).ae_strongly_measurable },
rw [A, ← of_real_rpow_of_nonneg to_real_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 to_real_nonneg), of_real_to_real],
exact (lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm_lt_top hp1 hp2 hf.2).ne
end
end normed_group
lemma integral_mono_ae {f g : α → ℝ} (hf : integrable f μ) (hg : integrable g μ) (h : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫ a, g a ∂μ :=
set_to_fun_mono (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul μ) (λ s _ _, weighted_smul_nonneg s)
hf hg h
@[mono] lemma integral_mono {f g : α → ℝ} (hf : integrable f μ) (hg : integrable g μ) (h : f ≤ g) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫ a, g a ∂μ :=
integral_mono_ae hf hg $ eventually_of_forall h
lemma integral_mono_of_nonneg {f g : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) (hgi : integrable g μ)
(h : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫ a, g a ∂μ :=
begin
by_cases hfm : ae_strongly_measurable f μ,
{ refine integral_mono_ae ⟨hfm, _⟩ hgi h,
refine (hgi.has_finite_integral.mono $ h.mp $ hf.mono $ λ x hf hfg, _),
simpa [abs_of_nonneg hf, abs_of_nonneg (le_trans hf hfg)] },
{ rw [integral_non_ae_strongly_measurable hfm],
exact integral_nonneg_of_ae (hf.trans h) }
end
lemma integral_mono_measure {f : α → ℝ} {ν} (hle : μ ≤ ν) (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[ν] f) (hfi : integrable f ν) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫ a, f a ∂ν :=
begin
have hfi' : integrable f μ := hfi.mono_measure hle,
have hf' : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f := hle.absolutely_continuous hf,
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae hf' hfi'.1, integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae hf hfi.1,
ennreal.to_real_le_to_real],
exacts [lintegral_mono' hle le_rfl, ((has_finite_integral_iff_of_real hf').1 hfi'.2).ne,
((has_finite_integral_iff_of_real hf).1 hfi.2).ne]
end
lemma norm_integral_le_integral_norm (f : α → E) : ∥(∫ a, f a ∂μ)∥ ≤ ∫ a, ∥f a∥ ∂μ :=
have le_ae : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, 0 ≤ ∥f a∥ := eventually_of_forall (λa, norm_nonneg _),
classical.by_cases
( λh : ae_strongly_measurable f μ,
calc ∥∫ a, f a ∂μ∥ ≤ ennreal.to_real (∫⁻ a, (ennreal.of_real ∥f a∥) ∂μ) :
norm_integral_le_lintegral_norm _
... = ∫ a, ∥f a∥ ∂μ : (integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae le_ae $ h.norm).symm )
( λh : ¬ae_strongly_measurable f μ,
begin
rw [integral_non_ae_strongly_measurable h, norm_zero],
exact integral_nonneg_of_ae le_ae
end )
lemma norm_integral_le_of_norm_le {f : α → E} {g : α → ℝ} (hg : integrable g μ)
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥f x∥ ≤ g x) : ∥∫ x, f x ∂μ∥ ≤ ∫ x, g x ∂μ :=
calc ∥∫ x, f x ∂μ∥ ≤ ∫ x, ∥f x∥ ∂μ : norm_integral_le_integral_norm f
... ≤ ∫ x, g x ∂μ :
integral_mono_of_nonneg (eventually_of_forall $ λ x, norm_nonneg _) hg h
lemma simple_func.integral_eq_integral (f : α →ₛ E) (hfi : integrable f μ) :
f.integral μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ :=
begin
rw [integral_eq f hfi, ← L1.simple_func.to_Lp_one_eq_to_L1,
L1.simple_func.integral_L1_eq_integral, L1.simple_func.integral_eq_integral],
exact simple_func.integral_congr hfi (Lp.simple_func.to_simple_func_to_Lp _ _).symm
end
lemma simple_func.integral_eq_sum (f : α →ₛ E) (hfi : integrable f μ) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∑ x in f.range, (ennreal.to_real (μ (f ⁻¹' {x}))) • x :=
by { rw [← f.integral_eq_integral hfi, simple_func.integral, ← simple_func.integral_eq], refl, }
@[simp] lemma integral_const (c : E) : ∫ x : α, c ∂μ = (μ univ).to_real • c :=
begin
cases (@le_top _ _ _ (μ univ)).lt_or_eq with hμ hμ,
{ haveI : is_finite_measure μ := ⟨hμ⟩,
exact set_to_fun_const (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul _) _, },
{ by_cases hc : c = 0,
{ simp [hc, integral_zero] },
{ have : ¬integrable (λ x : α, c) μ,
{ simp only [integrable_const_iff, not_or_distrib],
exact ⟨hc, hμ.not_lt⟩ },
simp [integral_undef, *] } }
end
lemma norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const [is_finite_measure μ] {f : α → E} {C : ℝ}
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∥f x∥ ≤ C) :
∥∫ x, f x ∂μ∥ ≤ C * (μ univ).to_real :=
calc ∥∫ x, f x ∂μ∥ ≤ ∫ x, C ∂μ : norm_integral_le_of_norm_le (integrable_const C) h
... = C * (μ univ).to_real : by rw [integral_const, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
lemma tendsto_integral_approx_on_of_measurable
[measurable_space E] [borel_space E]
{f : α → E} {s : set E} [separable_space s] (hfi : integrable f μ)
(hfm : measurable f) (hs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ closure s) {y₀ : E} (h₀ : y₀ ∈ s)
(h₀i : integrable (λ x, y₀) μ) :
tendsto (λ n, (simple_func.approx_on f hfm s y₀ h₀ n).integral μ) at_top (𝓝 $ ∫ x, f x ∂μ) :=
begin
have hfi' := simple_func.integrable_approx_on hfm hfi h₀ h₀i,
simp only [simple_func.integral_eq_integral _ (hfi' _)],
exact tendsto_set_to_fun_approx_on_of_measurable (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul μ)
hfi hfm hs h₀ h₀i,
end
lemma tendsto_integral_approx_on_of_measurable_of_range_subset
[measurable_space E] [borel_space E] {f : α → E}
(fmeas : measurable f) (hf : integrable f μ) (s : set E) [separable_space s]
(hs : range f ∪ {0} ⊆ s) :
tendsto (λ n, (simple_func.approx_on f fmeas s 0 (hs $ by simp) n).integral μ) at_top
(𝓝 $ ∫ x, f x ∂μ) :=
begin
apply tendsto_integral_approx_on_of_measurable hf fmeas _ _ (integrable_zero _ _ _),
exact eventually_of_forall (λ x, subset_closure (hs (set.mem_union_left _ (mem_range_self _)))),
end
variable {ν : measure α}
lemma integral_add_measure {f : α → E} (hμ : integrable f μ) (hν : integrable f ν) :
∫ x, f x ∂(μ + ν) = ∫ x, f x ∂μ + ∫ x, f x ∂ν :=
begin
have hfi := hμ.add_measure hν,
simp_rw [integral_eq_set_to_fun],
have hμ_dfma : dominated_fin_meas_additive (μ + ν) (weighted_smul μ : set α → E →L[ℝ] E) 1,
from dominated_fin_meas_additive.add_measure_right μ ν
(dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul μ) zero_le_one,
have hν_dfma : dominated_fin_meas_additive (μ + ν) (weighted_smul ν : set α → E →L[ℝ] E) 1,
from dominated_fin_meas_additive.add_measure_left μ ν
(dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul ν) zero_le_one,
rw [← set_to_fun_congr_measure_of_add_right hμ_dfma (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul μ)
f hfi,
← set_to_fun_congr_measure_of_add_left hν_dfma (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul ν)
f hfi],
refine set_to_fun_add_left' _ _ _ (λ s hs hμνs, _) f,
rw [measure.coe_add, pi.add_apply, add_lt_top] at hμνs,
rw [weighted_smul, weighted_smul, weighted_smul, ← add_smul, measure.coe_add, pi.add_apply,
to_real_add hμνs.1.ne hμνs.2.ne],
end
@[simp] lemma integral_zero_measure {m : measurable_space α} (f : α → E) :
∫ x, f x ∂(0 : measure α) = 0 :=
set_to_fun_measure_zero (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul _) rfl
theorem integral_finset_sum_measure {ι} {m : measurable_space α} {f : α → E}
{μ : ι → measure α} {s : finset ι} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, integrable f (μ i)) :
∫ a, f a ∂(∑ i in s, μ i) = ∑ i in s, ∫ a, f a ∂μ i :=
begin
classical,
refine finset.induction_on' s _ _, -- `induction s using finset.induction_on'` fails
{ simp },
{ intros i t hi ht hit iht,
simp only [finset.sum_insert hit, ← iht],
exact integral_add_measure (hf _ hi) (integrable_finset_sum_measure.2 $ λ j hj, hf j (ht hj)) }
end
lemma nndist_integral_add_measure_le_lintegral (h₁ : integrable f μ) (h₂ : integrable f ν) :
(nndist (∫ x, f x ∂μ) (∫ x, f x ∂(μ + ν)) : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ∫⁻ x, ∥f x∥₊ ∂ν :=
begin
rw [integral_add_measure h₁ h₂, nndist_comm, nndist_eq_nnnorm, add_sub_cancel'],
exact ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm _
end
theorem has_sum_integral_measure {ι} {m : measurable_space α} {f : α → E} {μ : ι → measure α}
(hf : integrable f (measure.sum μ)) :
has_sum (λ i, ∫ a, f a ∂μ i) (∫ a, f a ∂measure.sum μ) :=
begin
have hfi : ∀ i, integrable f (μ i) := λ i, hf.mono_measure (measure.le_sum _ _),
simp only [has_sum, ← integral_finset_sum_measure (λ i _, hfi i)],
refine metric.nhds_basis_ball.tendsto_right_iff.mpr (λ ε ε0, _),
lift ε to ℝ≥0 using ε0.le,
have hf_lt : ∫⁻ x, ∥f x∥₊ ∂(measure.sum μ) < ∞ := hf.2,
have hmem : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 ∫⁻ x, ∥f x∥₊ ∂(measure.sum μ), ∫⁻ x, ∥f x∥₊ ∂(measure.sum μ) < y + ε,
{ refine tendsto_id.add tendsto_const_nhds (lt_mem_nhds $ ennreal.lt_add_right _ _),
exacts [hf_lt.ne, ennreal.coe_ne_zero.2 (nnreal.coe_ne_zero.1 ε0.ne')] },
refine ((has_sum_lintegral_measure (λ x, ∥f x∥₊) μ).eventually hmem).mono (λ s hs, _),
obtain ⟨ν, hν⟩ : ∃ ν, (∑ i in s, μ i) + ν = measure.sum μ,
{ refine ⟨measure.sum (λ i : ↥(sᶜ : set ι), μ i), _⟩,
simpa only [← measure.sum_coe_finset] using measure.sum_add_sum_compl (s : set ι) μ },
rw [metric.mem_ball, ← coe_nndist, nnreal.coe_lt_coe, ← ennreal.coe_lt_coe, ← hν],
rw [← hν, integrable_add_measure] at hf,
refine (nndist_integral_add_measure_le_lintegral hf.1 hf.2).trans_lt _,
rw [← hν, lintegral_add_measure, lintegral_finset_sum_measure] at hs,
exact lt_of_add_lt_add_left hs
end
theorem integral_sum_measure {ι} {m : measurable_space α} {f : α → E} {μ : ι → measure α}
(hf : integrable f (measure.sum μ)) :
∫ a, f a ∂measure.sum μ = ∑' i, ∫ a, f a ∂μ i :=
(has_sum_integral_measure hf).tsum_eq.symm
@[simp] lemma integral_smul_measure (f : α → E) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫ x, f x ∂(c • μ) = c.to_real • ∫ x, f x ∂μ :=
begin
-- First we consider the “degenerate” case `c = ∞`
rcases eq_or_ne c ∞ with rfl|hc,
{ rw [ennreal.top_to_real, zero_smul, integral_eq_set_to_fun, set_to_fun_top_smul_measure], },
-- Main case: `c ≠ ∞`
simp_rw [integral_eq_set_to_fun, ← set_to_fun_smul_left],
have hdfma :
dominated_fin_meas_additive μ (weighted_smul (c • μ) : set α → E →L[ℝ] E) c.to_real,
from mul_one c.to_real
▸ (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul (c • μ)).of_smul_measure c hc,
have hdfma_smul := (dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul (c • μ)),
rw ← set_to_fun_congr_smul_measure c hc hdfma hdfma_smul f,
exact set_to_fun_congr_left' _ _ (λ s hs hμs, weighted_smul_smul_measure μ c) f,
end
lemma integral_map_of_strongly_measurable {β} [measurable_space β] {φ : α → β} (hφ : measurable φ)
{f : β → E} (hfm : strongly_measurable f) :
∫ y, f y ∂(measure.map φ μ) = ∫ x, f (φ x) ∂μ :=
begin
by_cases hfi : integrable f (measure.map φ μ), swap,
{ rw [integral_undef hfi, integral_undef],
rwa [← integrable_map_measure hfm.ae_strongly_measurable hφ.ae_measurable] },
borelize E,
haveI : separable_space (range f ∪ {0} : set E) := hfm.separable_space_range_union_singleton,
refine tendsto_nhds_unique
(tendsto_integral_approx_on_of_measurable_of_range_subset hfm.measurable hfi _ subset.rfl) _,
convert tendsto_integral_approx_on_of_measurable_of_range_subset (hfm.measurable.comp hφ)
((integrable_map_measure hfm.ae_strongly_measurable hφ.ae_measurable).1 hfi) (range f ∪ {0})
(by simp [insert_subset_insert, set.range_comp_subset_range]) using 1,
ext1 i,
simp only [simple_func.approx_on_comp, simple_func.integral_eq, measure.map_apply, hφ,
simple_func.measurable_set_preimage, ← preimage_comp, simple_func.coe_comp],
refine (finset.sum_subset (simple_func.range_comp_subset_range _ hφ) (λ y _ hy, _)).symm,
rw [simple_func.mem_range, ← set.preimage_singleton_eq_empty, simple_func.coe_comp] at hy,
rw [hy],
simp,
end
lemma integral_map {β} [measurable_space β] {φ : α → β} (hφ : ae_measurable φ μ)
{f : β → E} (hfm : ae_strongly_measurable f (measure.map φ μ)) :
∫ y, f y ∂(measure.map φ μ) = ∫ x, f (φ x) ∂μ :=
let g := hfm.mk f in calc
∫ y, f y ∂(measure.map φ μ) = ∫ y, g y ∂(measure.map φ μ) : integral_congr_ae hfm.ae_eq_mk
... = ∫ y, g y ∂(measure.map (hφ.mk φ) μ) :
by { congr' 1, exact measure.map_congr hφ.ae_eq_mk }
... = ∫ x, g (hφ.mk φ x) ∂μ :
integral_map_of_strongly_measurable hφ.measurable_mk hfm.strongly_measurable_mk
... = ∫ x, g (φ x) ∂μ : integral_congr_ae (hφ.ae_eq_mk.symm.fun_comp _)
... = ∫ x, f (φ x) ∂μ : integral_congr_ae $ ae_eq_comp hφ (hfm.ae_eq_mk).symm
lemma _root_.measurable_embedding.integral_map {β} {_ : measurable_space β} {f : α → β}
(hf : measurable_embedding f) (g : β → E) :
∫ y, g y ∂(measure.map f μ) = ∫ x, g (f x) ∂μ :=
begin
by_cases hgm : ae_strongly_measurable g (measure.map f μ),
{ exact integral_map hf.measurable.ae_measurable hgm },
{ rw [integral_non_ae_strongly_measurable hgm, integral_non_ae_strongly_measurable],
rwa ← hf.ae_strongly_measurable_map_iff }
end
lemma _root_.closed_embedding.integral_map {β} [topological_space α] [borel_space α]
[topological_space β] [measurable_space β] [borel_space β]
{φ : α → β} (hφ : closed_embedding φ) (f : β → E) :
∫ y, f y ∂(measure.map φ μ) = ∫ x, f (φ x) ∂μ :=
hφ.measurable_embedding.integral_map _
lemma integral_map_equiv {β} [measurable_space β] (e : α ≃ᵐ β) (f : β → E) :
∫ y, f y ∂(measure.map e μ) = ∫ x, f (e x) ∂μ :=
e.measurable_embedding.integral_map f
lemma measure_preserving.integral_comp {β} {_ : measurable_space β} {f : α → β} {ν}
(h₁ : measure_preserving f μ ν) (h₂ : measurable_embedding f) (g : β → E) :
∫ x, g (f x) ∂μ = ∫ y, g y ∂ν :=
h₁.map_eq ▸ (h₂.integral_map g).symm
lemma set_integral_eq_subtype {α} [measure_space α] {s : set α} (hs : measurable_set s)
(f : α → E) :
∫ x in s, f x = ∫ x : s, f x :=
by { rw ← map_comap_subtype_coe hs, exact (measurable_embedding.subtype_coe hs).integral_map _ }
@[simp] lemma integral_dirac' [measurable_space α] (f : α → E) (a : α)
(hfm : strongly_measurable f) :
∫ x, f x ∂(measure.dirac a) = f a :=
begin
borelize E,
calc ∫ x, f x ∂(measure.dirac a) = ∫ x, f a ∂(measure.dirac a) :
integral_congr_ae $ ae_eq_dirac' hfm.measurable
... = f a : by simp [measure.dirac_apply_of_mem]
end
@[simp] lemma integral_dirac [measurable_space α] [measurable_singleton_class α]
(f : α → E) (a : α) : ∫ x, f x ∂(measure.dirac a) = f a :=
calc ∫ x, f x ∂(measure.dirac a) = ∫ x, f a ∂(measure.dirac a) :
integral_congr_ae $ ae_eq_dirac f
... = f a : by simp [measure.dirac_apply_of_mem]
lemma mul_meas_ge_le_integral_of_nonneg [is_finite_measure μ] {f : α → ℝ} (hf_nonneg : 0 ≤ f)
(hf_int : integrable f μ) (ε : ℝ) :
ε * (μ {x | ε ≤ f x}).to_real ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ :=
begin
cases lt_or_le ε 0 with hε hε,
{ exact (mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg hε.le ennreal.to_real_nonneg).trans
(integral_nonneg hf_nonneg), },
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae (eventually_of_forall (λ x, hf_nonneg x))
hf_int.ae_strongly_measurable, ← ennreal.to_real_of_real hε, ← ennreal.to_real_mul],
have : {x : α | (ennreal.of_real ε).to_real ≤ f x}
= {x : α | ennreal.of_real ε ≤ (λ x, ennreal.of_real (f x)) x},
{ ext1 x,
rw [set.mem_set_of_eq, set.mem_set_of_eq, ← ennreal.to_real_of_real (hf_nonneg x)],
exact ennreal.to_real_le_to_real ennreal.of_real_ne_top ennreal.of_real_ne_top, },
rw this,
have h_meas : ae_measurable (λ x, ennreal.of_real (f x)) μ,
from measurable_id'.ennreal_of_real.comp_ae_measurable hf_int.ae_measurable,
have h_mul_meas_le := @mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ _ _ μ _ h_meas (ennreal.of_real ε),
rw ennreal.to_real_le_to_real _ _,
{ exact h_mul_meas_le, },
{ simp only [ne.def, with_top.mul_eq_top_iff, ennreal.of_real_eq_zero, not_le,
ennreal.of_real_ne_top, false_and, or_false, not_and],
exact λ _, measure_ne_top _ _, },
{ have h_lt_top : ∫⁻ a, ∥f a∥₊ ∂μ < ∞ := hf_int.has_finite_integral,
simp_rw [← of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm, real.norm_eq_abs] at h_lt_top,
convert h_lt_top.ne,
ext1 x,
rw abs_of_nonneg (hf_nonneg x), },
end
end properties
mk_simp_attribute integral_simps "Simp set for integral rules."
attribute [integral_simps] integral_neg integral_smul L1.integral_add L1.integral_sub
L1.integral_smul L1.integral_neg
attribute [irreducible] integral L1.integral
section integral_trim
variables {H β γ : Type*} [normed_group H]
{m m0 : measurable_space β} {μ : measure β}
/-- Simple function seen as simple function of a larger `measurable_space`. -/
def simple_func.to_larger_space (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : @simple_func β m γ) : simple_func β γ :=
⟨@simple_func.to_fun β m γ f, λ x, hm _ (@simple_func.measurable_set_fiber β γ m f x),
@simple_func.finite_range β γ m f⟩
lemma simple_func.coe_to_larger_space_eq (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : @simple_func β m γ) :
⇑(f.to_larger_space hm) = f :=
rfl
lemma integral_simple_func_larger_space (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : @simple_func β m F)
(hf_int : integrable f μ) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∑ x in (@simple_func.range β F m f), (ennreal.to_real (μ (f ⁻¹' {x}))) • x :=
begin
simp_rw ← f.coe_to_larger_space_eq hm,
have hf_int : integrable (f.to_larger_space hm) μ, by rwa simple_func.coe_to_larger_space_eq,
rw simple_func.integral_eq_sum _ hf_int,
congr,
end
lemma integral_trim_simple_func (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : @simple_func β m F) (hf_int : integrable f μ) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂(μ.trim hm) :=
begin
have hf : strongly_measurable[m] f, from @simple_func.strongly_measurable β F m _ f,
have hf_int_m := hf_int.trim hm hf,
rw [integral_simple_func_larger_space (le_refl m) f hf_int_m,
integral_simple_func_larger_space hm f hf_int],
congr' with x,
congr,
exact (trim_measurable_set_eq hm (@simple_func.measurable_set_fiber β F m f x)).symm,
end
lemma integral_trim (hm : m ≤ m0) {f : β → F} (hf : strongly_measurable[m] f) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂(μ.trim hm) :=
begin
borelize F,
by_cases hf_int : integrable f μ,
swap,
{ have hf_int_m : ¬ integrable f (μ.trim hm),
from λ hf_int_m, hf_int (integrable_of_integrable_trim hm hf_int_m),
rw [integral_undef hf_int, integral_undef hf_int_m], },
haveI : separable_space (range f ∪ {0} : set F) := hf.separable_space_range_union_singleton,
let f_seq := @simple_func.approx_on F β _ _ _ m _ hf.measurable (range f ∪ {0}) 0 (by simp) _,
have hf_seq_meas : ∀ n, strongly_measurable[m] (f_seq n),
from λ n, @simple_func.strongly_measurable β F m _ (f_seq n),
have hf_seq_int : ∀ n, integrable (f_seq n) μ,
from simple_func.integrable_approx_on_range (hf.mono hm).measurable hf_int,
have hf_seq_int_m : ∀ n, integrable (f_seq n) (μ.trim hm),
from λ n, (hf_seq_int n).trim hm (hf_seq_meas n) ,
have hf_seq_eq : ∀ n, ∫ x, f_seq n x ∂μ = ∫ x, f_seq n x ∂(μ.trim hm),
from λ n, integral_trim_simple_func hm (f_seq n) (hf_seq_int n),
have h_lim_1 : at_top.tendsto (λ n, ∫ x, f_seq n x ∂μ) (𝓝 (∫ x, f x ∂μ)),
{ refine tendsto_integral_of_L1 f hf_int (eventually_of_forall hf_seq_int) _,
exact simple_func.tendsto_approx_on_range_L1_nnnorm (hf.mono hm).measurable hf_int, },
have h_lim_2 : at_top.tendsto (λ n, ∫ x, f_seq n x ∂μ) (𝓝 (∫ x, f x ∂(μ.trim hm))),
{ simp_rw hf_seq_eq,
refine @tendsto_integral_of_L1 β F _ _ _ m (μ.trim hm) _ f
(hf_int.trim hm hf) _ _ (eventually_of_forall hf_seq_int_m) _,
exact @simple_func.tendsto_approx_on_range_L1_nnnorm β F m _ _ _ f _ _
hf.measurable (hf_int.trim hm hf), },
exact tendsto_nhds_unique h_lim_1 h_lim_2,
end
lemma integral_trim_ae (hm : m ≤ m0) {f : β → F} (hf : ae_strongly_measurable f (μ.trim hm)) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂(μ.trim hm) :=
begin
rw [integral_congr_ae (ae_eq_of_ae_eq_trim hf.ae_eq_mk), integral_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk],
exact integral_trim hm hf.strongly_measurable_mk,
end
lemma ae_eq_trim_of_strongly_measurable
[topological_space γ] [metrizable_space γ] (hm : m ≤ m0) {f g : β → γ}
(hf : strongly_measurable[m] f) (hg : strongly_measurable[m] g) (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
f =ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g :=
begin
rwa [eventually_eq, ae_iff, trim_measurable_set_eq hm _],
exact (hf.measurable_set_eq_fun hg).compl
end
lemma ae_eq_trim_iff [topological_space γ] [metrizable_space γ]
(hm : m ≤ m0) {f g : β → γ} (hf : strongly_measurable[m] f) (hg : strongly_measurable[m] g) :
f =ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
⟨ae_eq_of_ae_eq_trim, ae_eq_trim_of_strongly_measurable hm hf hg⟩
lemma ae_le_trim_of_strongly_measurable
[linear_order γ] [topological_space γ] [order_closed_topology γ] [pseudo_metrizable_space γ]
(hm : m ≤ m0) {f g : β → γ} (hf : strongly_measurable[m] f) (hg : strongly_measurable[m] g)
(hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) :
f ≤ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g :=
begin
rwa [eventually_le, ae_iff, trim_measurable_set_eq hm _],
exact (hf.measurable_set_le hg).compl,
end
lemma ae_le_trim_iff
[linear_order γ] [topological_space γ] [order_closed_topology γ] [pseudo_metrizable_space γ]
(hm : m ≤ m0) {f g : β → γ} (hf : strongly_measurable[m] f) (hg : strongly_measurable[m] g) :
f ≤ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g ↔ f ≤ᵐ[μ] g :=
⟨ae_le_of_ae_le_trim, ae_le_trim_of_strongly_measurable hm hf hg⟩
end integral_trim
end measure_theory
|
aa516bae99cd1289a16660303683673408ff0927 | a7eef317ddec01b9fc6cfbb876fe7ac00f205ac7 | /src/topology/algebra/ordered.lean | abbcc1c732f984ebd1e98c1cdb7671aeefe5453c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kmill/mathlib | ea5a007b67ae4e9e18dd50d31d8aa60f650425ee | 1a419a9fea7b959317eddd556e1bb9639f4dcc05 | refs/heads/master | 1,668,578,197,719 | 1,593,629,163,000 | 1,593,629,163,000 | 276,482,939 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,593,637,960,000 | 1,593,637,959,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 91,380 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import tactic.tfae
import order.liminf_limsup
import data.set.intervals
import topology.algebra.group
/-!
# Theory of topology on ordered spaces
## Main definitions
The order topology on an ordered space is the topology generated by all open intervals (or
equivalently by those of the form `(-∞, a)` and `(b, +∞)`). We define it as `preorder.topology α`.
However, we do *not* register it as an instance (as many existing ordered types already have
topologies, which would be equal but not definitionally equal to `preorder.topology α`). Instead,
we introduce a class `order_topology α`(which is a `Prop`, also known as a mixin) saying that on
the type `α` having already a topological space structure and a preorder structure, the topological
structure is equal to the order topology.
We also introduce another (mixin) class `order_closed_topology α` saying that the set of points
`(x, y)` with `x ≤ y` is closed in the product space. This is automatically satisfied on a linear
order with the order topology.
We prove many basic properties of such topologies.
## Main statements
This file contains the proofs of the following facts. For exact requirements (`order_closed_topology`
vs `order_topology`, `preorder` vs `partial_order` vs `linear_order` etc) see their statements.
### Open / closed sets
* `is_open_lt` : if `f` and `g` are continuous functions, then `{x | f x < g x}` is open;
* `is_open_Iio`, `is_open_Ioi`, `is_open_Ioo` : open intervals are open;
* `is_closed_le` : if `f` and `g` are continuous functions, then `{x | f x ≤ g x}` is closed;
* `is_closed_Iic`, `is_closed_Ici`, `is_closed_Icc` : closed intervals are closed;
* `frontier_le_subset_eq`, `frontier_lt_subset_eq` : frontiers of both `{x | f x ≤ g x}`
and `{x | f x < g x}` are included by `{x | f x = g x}`;
* `exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds`, `exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds` : if `x < y`, then any
neighborhood of `x` includes an interval `[x, z)` for some `z ∈ (x, y]`, and any neighborhood
of `y` includes an interval `(z, y]` for some `z ∈ [x, y)`.
### Convergence and inequalities
* `le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto` : if `f` converges to `a`, `g` converges to `b`, and eventually
`f x ≤ g x`, then `a ≤ b`
* `le_of_tendsto`, `ge_of_tendsto` : if `f` converges to `a` and eventually `f x ≤ b`
(resp., `b ≤ f x`), then `a ≤ b` (resp., `b ≤ a); we also provide primed versions
that assume the inequalities to hold for all `x`.
### Min, max, `Sup` and `Inf`
* `continuous.min`, `continuous.max`: pointwise `min`/`max` of two continuous functions is
continuous.
* `tendsto.min`, `tendsto.max` : if `f` tends to `a` and `g` tends to `b`, then their pointwise
`min`/`max` tend to `min a b` and `max a b`, respectively.
* `tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le` : theorem known as squeeze theorem,
sandwich theorem, theorem of Carabinieri, and two policemen (and a drunk) theorem; if `g` and `h`
both converge to `a`, and eventually `g x ≤ f x ≤ h x`, then `f` converges to `a`.
### Connected sets and Intermediate Value Theorem
* `is_preconnected_I??` : all intervals `I??` are preconnected,
* `is_preconnected.intermediate_value`, `intermediate_value_univ` : Intermediate Value Theorem for
connected sets and connected spaces, respectively;
* `intermediate_value_Icc`, `intermediate_value_Icc'`: Intermediate Value Theorem for functions
on closed intervals.
### Miscellaneous facts
* `compact.exists_forall_le`, `compact.exists_forall_ge` : extreme value theorem, a continuous
function on a compact set takes its minimum and maximum values.
* `is_closed.Icc_subset_of_forall_mem_nhds_within` : “Continuous induction” principle;
if `s ∩ [a, b]` is closed, `a ∈ s`, and for each `x ∈ [a, b) ∩ s` some of its right neighborhoods
is included `s`, then `[a, b] ⊆ s`.
* `is_closed.Icc_subset_of_forall_exists_gt`, `is_closed.mem_of_ge_of_forall_exists_gt` : two
other versions of the “continuous induction” principle.
## Implementation
We do _not_ register the order topology as an instance on a preorder (or even on a linear order).
Indeed, on many such spaces, a topology has already been constructed in a different way (think
of the discrete spaces `ℕ` or `ℤ`, or `ℝ` that could inherit a topology as the completion of `ℚ`),
and is in general not defeq to the one generated by the intervals. We make it available as a
definition `preorder.topology α` though, that can be registered as an instance when necessary, or
for specific types.
-/
open classical set filter topological_space
open function (curry uncurry)
open_locale topological_space classical filter
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
/-- A topology on a set which is both a topological space and a preorder is _order-closed_ if the
set of points `(x, y)` with `x ≤ y` is closed in the product space. We introduce this as a mixin.
This property is satisfied for the order topology on a linear order, but it can be satisfied more
generally, and suffices to derive many interesting properties relating order and topology. -/
class order_closed_topology (α : Type*) [topological_space α] [preorder α] : Prop :=
(is_closed_le' : is_closed {p:α×α | p.1 ≤ p.2})
instance : Π [topological_space α], topological_space (order_dual α) := id
section order_closed_topology
section preorder
variables [topological_space α] [preorder α] [t : order_closed_topology α]
include t
lemma is_closed_le [topological_space β] {f g : β → α} (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) :
is_closed {b | f b ≤ g b} :=
continuous_iff_is_closed.mp (hf.prod_mk hg) _ t.is_closed_le'
lemma is_closed_le' (a : α) : is_closed {b | b ≤ a} :=
is_closed_le continuous_id continuous_const
lemma is_closed_Iic {a : α} : is_closed (Iic a) :=
is_closed_le' a
lemma is_closed_ge' (a : α) : is_closed {b | a ≤ b} :=
is_closed_le continuous_const continuous_id
lemma is_closed_Ici {a : α} : is_closed (Ici a) :=
is_closed_ge' a
instance : order_closed_topology (order_dual α) :=
⟨continuous_swap _ (@order_closed_topology.is_closed_le' α _ _ _)⟩
lemma is_closed_Icc {a b : α} : is_closed (Icc a b) :=
is_closed_inter is_closed_Ici is_closed_Iic
lemma le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto {f g : β → α} {b : filter β} {a₁ a₂ : α} (hb : b ≠ ⊥)
(hf : tendsto f b (𝓝 a₁)) (hg : tendsto g b (𝓝 a₂)) (h : ∀ᶠ x in b, f x ≤ g x) :
a₁ ≤ a₂ :=
have tendsto (λb, (f b, g b)) b (𝓝 (a₁, a₂)),
by rw [nhds_prod_eq]; exact hf.prod_mk hg,
show (a₁, a₂) ∈ {p:α×α | p.1 ≤ p.2},
from mem_of_closed_of_tendsto hb this t.is_closed_le' h
lemma le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' {f g : β → α} {b : filter β} {a₁ a₂ : α} (hb : b ≠ ⊥)
(hf : tendsto f b (𝓝 a₁)) (hg : tendsto g b (𝓝 a₂)) (h : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) :
a₁ ≤ a₂ :=
le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto hb hf hg (eventually_of_forall _ h)
lemma le_of_tendsto {f : β → α} {a b : α} {x : filter β}
(nt : x ≠ ⊥) (lim : tendsto f x (𝓝 a)) (h : ∀ᶠ c in x, f c ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto nt lim tendsto_const_nhds h
lemma le_of_tendsto' {f : β → α} {a b : α} {x : filter β}
(nt : x ≠ ⊥) (lim : tendsto f x (𝓝 a)) (h : ∀ c, f c ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
le_of_tendsto nt lim (eventually_of_forall _ h)
lemma ge_of_tendsto {f : β → α} {a b : α} {x : filter β}
(nt : x ≠ ⊥) (lim : tendsto f x (𝓝 a)) (h : ∀ᶠ c in x, b ≤ f c) : b ≤ a :=
le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto nt tendsto_const_nhds lim h
lemma ge_of_tendsto' {f : β → α} {a b : α} {x : filter β}
(nt : x ≠ ⊥) (lim : tendsto f x (𝓝 a)) (h : ∀ c, b ≤ f c) : b ≤ a :=
ge_of_tendsto nt lim (eventually_of_forall _ h)
@[simp]
lemma closure_le_eq [topological_space β] {f g : β → α} (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) :
closure {b | f b ≤ g b} = {b | f b ≤ g b} :=
(is_closed_le hf hg).closure_eq
lemma closure_lt_subset_le [topological_space β] {f g : β → α} (hf : continuous f)
(hg : continuous g) :
closure {b | f b < g b} ⊆ {b | f b ≤ g b} :=
by { rw [←closure_le_eq hf hg], exact closure_mono (λ b, le_of_lt) }
lemma continuous_within_at.closure_le [topological_space β]
{f g : β → α} {s : set β} {x : β} (hx : x ∈ closure s)
(hf : continuous_within_at f s x)
(hg : continuous_within_at g s x)
(h : ∀ y ∈ s, f y ≤ g y) : f x ≤ g x :=
show (f x, g x) ∈ {p : α × α | p.1 ≤ p.2},
from order_closed_topology.is_closed_le'.closure_subset ((hf.prod hg).mem_closure hx h)
/-- If `s` is a closed set and two functions `f` and `g` are continuous on `s`,
then the set `{x ∈ s | f x ≤ g x}` is a closed set. -/
lemma is_closed.is_closed_le [topological_space β] {f g : β → α} {s : set β} (hs : is_closed s)
(hf : continuous_on f s) (hg : continuous_on g s) :
is_closed {x ∈ s | f x ≤ g x} :=
(hf.prod hg).preimage_closed_of_closed hs order_closed_topology.is_closed_le'
end preorder
section partial_order
variables [topological_space α] [partial_order α] [t : order_closed_topology α]
include t
private lemma is_closed_eq : is_closed {p : α × α | p.1 = p.2} :=
by simp only [le_antisymm_iff];
exact is_closed_inter t.is_closed_le' (is_closed_le continuous_snd continuous_fst)
@[priority 90] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance order_closed_topology.to_t2_space : t2_space α :=
{ t2 :=
have is_open {p : α × α | p.1 ≠ p.2}, from is_closed_eq,
assume a b h,
let ⟨u, v, hu, hv, ha, hb, h⟩ := is_open_prod_iff.mp this a b h in
⟨u, v, hu, hv, ha, hb,
set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 $ assume a ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
have a ≠ a, from @h (a, a) ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
this rfl⟩ }
end partial_order
section linear_order
variables [topological_space α] [linear_order α] [order_closed_topology α]
lemma is_open_lt [topological_space β] {f g : β → α} (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) :
is_open {b | f b < g b} :=
by simp [lt_iff_not_ge, -not_le]; exact is_closed_le hg hf
variables {a b : α}
lemma is_open_Iio : is_open (Iio a) :=
is_open_lt continuous_id continuous_const
lemma is_open_Ioi : is_open (Ioi a) :=
is_open_lt continuous_const continuous_id
lemma is_open_Ioo : is_open (Ioo a b) :=
is_open_inter is_open_Ioi is_open_Iio
@[simp] lemma interior_Ioi : interior (Ioi a) = Ioi a :=
interior_eq_of_open is_open_Ioi
@[simp] lemma interior_Iio : interior (Iio a) = Iio a :=
interior_eq_of_open is_open_Iio
@[simp] lemma interior_Ioo : interior (Ioo a b) = Ioo a b :=
interior_eq_of_open is_open_Ioo
/-- Intermediate value theorem for two functions: if `f` and `g` are two continuous functions
on a preconnected space and `f a ≤ g a` and `g b ≤ f b`, then for some `x` we have `f x = g x`. -/
lemma intermediate_value_univ₂ {γ : Type*} [topological_space γ] [preconnected_space γ] {a b : γ}
{f g : γ → α} (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) (ha : f a ≤ g a) (hb : g b ≤ f b) :
∃ x, f x = g x :=
begin
obtain ⟨x, h, hfg, hgf⟩ : (univ ∩ {x | f x ≤ g x ∧ g x ≤ f x}).nonempty,
from is_preconnected_closed_iff.1 preconnected_space.is_preconnected_univ _ _
(is_closed_le hf hg) (is_closed_le hg hf) (λ x hx, le_total _ _) ⟨a, trivial, ha⟩
⟨b, trivial, hb⟩,
exact ⟨x, le_antisymm hfg hgf⟩
end
/-- Intermediate value theorem for two functions: if `f` and `g` are two functions continuous
on a preconnected set `s` and for some `a b ∈ s` we have `f a ≤ g a` and `g b ≤ f b`,
then for some `x ∈ s` we have `f x = g x`. -/
lemma is_preconnected.intermediate_value₂ {γ : Type*} [topological_space γ] {s : set γ}
(hs : is_preconnected s) {a b : γ} (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) {f g : γ → α}
(hf : continuous_on f s) (hg : continuous_on g s) (ha' : f a ≤ g a) (hb' : g b ≤ f b) :
∃ x ∈ s, f x = g x :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := @intermediate_value_univ₂ α _ _ _ s _ (subtype.preconnected_space hs) ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
_ _ (continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict.1 hf) (continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict.1 hg)
ha' hb'
in ⟨x, x.2, hx⟩
/-- Intermediate Value Theorem for continuous functions on connected sets. -/
lemma is_preconnected.intermediate_value {γ : Type*} [topological_space γ] {s : set γ}
(hs : is_preconnected s) {a b : γ} (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) {f : γ → α}
(hf : continuous_on f s) :
Icc (f a) (f b) ⊆ f '' s :=
λ x hx, mem_image_iff_bex.2 $ hs.intermediate_value₂ ha hb hf continuous_on_const hx.1 hx.2
/-- Intermediate Value Theorem for continuous functions on connected spaces. -/
lemma intermediate_value_univ {γ : Type*} [topological_space γ] [preconnected_space γ]
(a b : γ) {f : γ → α} (hf : continuous f) :
Icc (f a) (f b) ⊆ range f :=
λ x hx, intermediate_value_univ₂ hf continuous_const hx.1 hx.2
/-- If a preconnected set contains endpoints of an interval, then it includes the whole interval. -/
lemma is_preconnected.Icc_subset {s : set α} (hs : is_preconnected s)
{a b : α} (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) :
Icc a b ⊆ s :=
by simpa only [image_id] using hs.intermediate_value ha hb continuous_on_id
/-- If a preconnected set contains endpoints of an interval, then it includes the whole interval. -/
lemma is_connected.Icc_subset {s : set α} (hs : is_connected s)
{a b : α} (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) :
Icc a b ⊆ s :=
hs.2.Icc_subset ha hb
/-- If preconnected set in a linear order space is unbounded below and above, then it is the whole
space. -/
lemma is_preconnected.eq_univ_of_unbounded {s : set α} (hs : is_preconnected s) (hb : ¬bdd_below s)
(ha : ¬bdd_above s) :
s = univ :=
begin
refine eq_univ_of_forall (λ x, _),
obtain ⟨y, ys, hy⟩ : ∃ y ∈ s, y < x := not_bdd_below_iff.1 hb x,
obtain ⟨z, zs, hz⟩ : ∃ z ∈ s, x < z := not_bdd_above_iff.1 ha x,
exact hs.Icc_subset ys zs ⟨le_of_lt hy, le_of_lt hz⟩
end
end linear_order
section decidable_linear_order
variables [topological_space α] [decidable_linear_order α] [order_closed_topology α] {f g : β → α}
section
variables [topological_space β] (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g)
include hf hg
lemma frontier_le_subset_eq : frontier {b | f b ≤ g b} ⊆ {b | f b = g b} :=
begin
rw [frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure, closure_le_eq hf hg],
rintros b ⟨hb₁, hb₂⟩,
refine le_antisymm hb₁ (closure_lt_subset_le hg hf _),
convert hb₂ using 2, simp only [not_le.symm], refl
end
lemma frontier_lt_subset_eq : frontier {b | f b < g b} ⊆ {b | f b = g b} :=
by rw ← frontier_compl;
convert frontier_le_subset_eq hg hf; simp [ext_iff, eq_comm]
lemma continuous.max : continuous (λb, max (f b) (g b)) :=
have ∀b∈frontier {b | f b ≤ g b}, g b = f b, from assume b hb, (frontier_le_subset_eq hf hg hb).symm,
continuous_if this hg hf
lemma continuous.min : continuous (λb, min (f b) (g b)) :=
have ∀b∈frontier {b | f b ≤ g b}, f b = g b, from assume b hb, frontier_le_subset_eq hf hg hb,
continuous_if this hf hg
end
lemma tendsto.max {b : filter β} {a₁ a₂ : α} (hf : tendsto f b (𝓝 a₁)) (hg : tendsto g b (𝓝 a₂)) :
tendsto (λb, max (f b) (g b)) b (𝓝 (max a₁ a₂)) :=
show tendsto ((λp:α×α, max p.1 p.2) ∘ (λb, (f b, g b))) b (𝓝 (max a₁ a₂)),
from tendsto.comp
begin
rw [←nhds_prod_eq],
from continuous_iff_continuous_at.mp (continuous_fst.max continuous_snd) _
end
(hf.prod_mk hg)
lemma tendsto.min {b : filter β} {a₁ a₂ : α} (hf : tendsto f b (𝓝 a₁)) (hg : tendsto g b (𝓝 a₂)) :
tendsto (λb, min (f b) (g b)) b (𝓝 (min a₁ a₂)) :=
show tendsto ((λp:α×α, min p.1 p.2) ∘ (λb, (f b, g b))) b (𝓝 (min a₁ a₂)),
from tendsto.comp
begin
rw [←nhds_prod_eq],
from continuous_iff_continuous_at.mp (continuous_fst.min continuous_snd) _
end
(hf.prod_mk hg)
end decidable_linear_order
end order_closed_topology
/-- The order topology on an ordered type is the topology generated by open intervals. We register
it on a preorder, but it is mostly interesting in linear orders, where it is also order-closed.
We define it as a mixin. If you want to introduce the order topology on a preorder, use
`preorder.topology`. -/
class order_topology (α : Type*) [t : topological_space α] [preorder α] : Prop :=
(topology_eq_generate_intervals : t = generate_from {s | ∃a, s = Ioi a ∨ s = Iio a})
/-- (Order) topology on a partial order `α` generated by the subbase of open intervals
`(a, ∞) = { x ∣ a < x }, (-∞ , b) = {x ∣ x < b}` for all `a, b` in `α`. We do not register it as an
instance as many ordered sets are already endowed with the same topology, most often in a non-defeq
way though. Register as a local instance when necessary. -/
def preorder.topology (α : Type*) [preorder α] : topological_space α :=
generate_from {s : set α | ∃ (a : α), s = {b : α | a < b} ∨ s = {b : α | b < a}}
section order_topology
instance {α : Type*} [topological_space α] [partial_order α] [order_topology α] :
order_topology (order_dual α) :=
⟨by convert @order_topology.topology_eq_generate_intervals α _ _ _;
conv in (_ ∨ _) { rw or.comm }; refl⟩
section partial_order
variables [topological_space α] [partial_order α] [t : order_topology α]
include t
lemma is_open_iff_generate_intervals {s : set α} :
is_open s ↔ generate_open {s | ∃a, s = Ioi a ∨ s = Iio a} s :=
by rw [t.topology_eq_generate_intervals]; refl
lemma is_open_lt' (a : α) : is_open {b:α | a < b} :=
by rw [@is_open_iff_generate_intervals α _ _ t]; exact generate_open.basic _ ⟨a, or.inl rfl⟩
lemma is_open_gt' (a : α) : is_open {b:α | b < a} :=
by rw [@is_open_iff_generate_intervals α _ _ t]; exact generate_open.basic _ ⟨a, or.inr rfl⟩
lemma lt_mem_nhds {a b : α} (h : a < b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 b, a < x :=
mem_nhds_sets (is_open_lt' _) h
lemma le_mem_nhds {a b : α} (h : a < b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 b, a ≤ x :=
(𝓝 b).sets_of_superset (lt_mem_nhds h) $ assume b hb, le_of_lt hb
lemma gt_mem_nhds {a b : α} (h : a < b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x < b :=
mem_nhds_sets (is_open_gt' _) h
lemma ge_mem_nhds {a b : α} (h : a < b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ≤ b :=
(𝓝 a).sets_of_superset (gt_mem_nhds h) $ assume b hb, le_of_lt hb
lemma nhds_eq_order (a : α) :
𝓝 a = (⨅b ∈ Iio a, 𝓟 (Ioi b)) ⊓ (⨅b ∈ Ioi a, 𝓟 (Iio b)) :=
by rw [t.topology_eq_generate_intervals, nhds_generate_from];
from le_antisymm
(le_inf
(le_infi $ assume b, le_infi $ assume hb,
infi_le_of_le {c : α | b < c} $ infi_le _ ⟨hb, b, or.inl rfl⟩)
(le_infi $ assume b, le_infi $ assume hb,
infi_le_of_le {c : α | c < b} $ infi_le _ ⟨hb, b, or.inr rfl⟩))
(le_infi $ assume s, le_infi $ assume ⟨ha, b, hs⟩,
match s, ha, hs with
| _, h, (or.inl rfl) := inf_le_left_of_le $ infi_le_of_le b $ infi_le _ h
| _, h, (or.inr rfl) := inf_le_right_of_le $ infi_le_of_le b $ infi_le _ h
end)
@[nolint ge_or_gt] -- see Note [nolint_ge]
lemma tendsto_order {f : β → α} {a : α} {x : filter β} :
tendsto f x (𝓝 a) ↔ (∀ a' < a, ∀ᶠ b in x, a' < f b) ∧ (∀ a' > a, ∀ᶠ b in x, f b < a') :=
by simp [nhds_eq_order a, tendsto_inf, tendsto_infi, tendsto_principal]
/-- Also known as squeeze or sandwich theorem. This version assumes that inequalities hold
eventually for the filter. -/
lemma tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' {f g h : β → α} {b : filter β} {a : α}
(hg : tendsto g b (𝓝 a)) (hh : tendsto h b (𝓝 a))
(hgf : ∀ᶠ b in b, g b ≤ f b) (hfh : ∀ᶠ b in b, f b ≤ h b) :
tendsto f b (𝓝 a) :=
tendsto_order.2
⟨assume a' h',
have ∀ᶠ b in b, a' < g b, from (tendsto_order.1 hg).left a' h',
by filter_upwards [this, hgf] assume a, lt_of_lt_of_le,
assume a' h',
have ∀ᶠ b in b, h b < a', from (tendsto_order.1 hh).right a' h',
by filter_upwards [this, hfh] assume a h₁ h₂, lt_of_le_of_lt h₂ h₁⟩
/-- Also known as squeeze or sandwich theorem. This version assumes that inequalities hold
everywhere. -/
lemma tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le {f g h : β → α} {b : filter β} {a : α}
(hg : tendsto g b (𝓝 a)) (hh : tendsto h b (𝓝 a)) (hgf : g ≤ f) (hfh : f ≤ h) :
tendsto f b (𝓝 a) :=
tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' hg hh
(eventually_of_forall _ hgf) (eventually_of_forall _ hfh)
lemma nhds_order_unbounded {a : α} (hu : ∃u, a < u) (hl : ∃l, l < a) :
𝓝 a = (⨅l (h₂ : l < a) u (h₂ : a < u), 𝓟 (Ioo l u)) :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hu, ⟨l, hl⟩ := hl in
calc 𝓝 a = (⨅b<a, 𝓟 {c | b < c}) ⊓ (⨅b>a, 𝓟 {c | c < b}) : nhds_eq_order a
... = (⨅b<a, 𝓟 {c | b < c} ⊓ (⨅b>a, 𝓟 {c | c < b})) :
binfi_inf hl
... = (⨅l<a, (⨅u>a, 𝓟 {c | c < u} ⊓ 𝓟 {c | l < c})) :
begin
congr, funext x,
congr, funext hx,
rw [inf_comm],
apply binfi_inf hu
end
... = _ : by simp [inter_comm]; refl
lemma tendsto_order_unbounded {f : β → α} {a : α} {x : filter β}
(hu : ∃u, a < u) (hl : ∃l, l < a) (h : ∀l u, l < a → a < u → ∀ᶠ b in x, l < f b ∧ f b < u) :
tendsto f x (𝓝 a) :=
by rw [nhds_order_unbounded hu hl];
from (tendsto_infi.2 $ assume l, tendsto_infi.2 $ assume hl,
tendsto_infi.2 $ assume u, tendsto_infi.2 $ assume hu, tendsto_principal.2 $ h l u hl hu)
end partial_order
@[nolint ge_or_gt] -- see Note [nolint_ge]
theorem induced_order_topology' {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
[partial_order α] [ta : topological_space β] [partial_order β] [order_topology β]
(f : α → β) (hf : ∀ {x y}, f x < f y ↔ x < y)
(H₁ : ∀ {a x}, x < f a → ∃ b < a, x ≤ f b)
(H₂ : ∀ {a x}, f a < x → ∃ b > a, f b ≤ x) :
@order_topology _ (induced f ta) _ :=
begin
letI := induced f ta,
refine ⟨eq_of_nhds_eq_nhds (λ a, _)⟩,
rw [nhds_induced, nhds_generate_from, nhds_eq_order (f a)],
apply le_antisymm,
{ refine le_infi (λ s, le_infi $ λ hs, le_principal_iff.2 _),
rcases hs with ⟨ab, b, rfl|rfl⟩,
{ exact mem_comap_sets.2 ⟨{x | f b < x},
mem_inf_sets_of_left $ mem_infi_sets _ $ mem_infi_sets (hf.2 ab) $ mem_principal_self _,
λ x, hf.1⟩ },
{ exact mem_comap_sets.2 ⟨{x | x < f b},
mem_inf_sets_of_right $ mem_infi_sets _ $ mem_infi_sets (hf.2 ab) $ mem_principal_self _,
λ x, hf.1⟩ } },
{ rw [← map_le_iff_le_comap],
refine le_inf _ _; refine le_infi (λ x, le_infi $ λ h, le_principal_iff.2 _); simp,
{ rcases H₁ h with ⟨b, ab, xb⟩,
refine mem_infi_sets _ (mem_infi_sets ⟨ab, b, or.inl rfl⟩ (mem_principal_sets.2 _)),
exact λ c hc, lt_of_le_of_lt xb (hf.2 hc) },
{ rcases H₂ h with ⟨b, ab, xb⟩,
refine mem_infi_sets _ (mem_infi_sets ⟨ab, b, or.inr rfl⟩ (mem_principal_sets.2 _)),
exact λ c hc, lt_of_lt_of_le (hf.2 hc) xb } },
end
theorem induced_order_topology {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
[partial_order α] [ta : topological_space β] [partial_order β] [order_topology β]
(f : α → β) (hf : ∀ {x y}, f x < f y ↔ x < y)
(H : ∀ {x y}, x < y → ∃ a, x < f a ∧ f a < y) :
@order_topology _ (induced f ta) _ :=
induced_order_topology' f @hf
(λ a x xa, let ⟨b, xb, ba⟩ := H xa in ⟨b, hf.1 ba, le_of_lt xb⟩)
(λ a x ax, let ⟨b, ab, bx⟩ := H ax in ⟨b, hf.1 ab, le_of_lt bx⟩)
lemma nhds_top_order [topological_space α] [order_top α] [order_topology α] :
𝓝 (⊤:α) = (⨅l (h₂ : l < ⊤), 𝓟 (Ioi l)) :=
by simp [nhds_eq_order (⊤:α)]
lemma nhds_bot_order [topological_space α] [order_bot α] [order_topology α] :
𝓝 (⊥:α) = (⨅l (h₂ : ⊥ < l), 𝓟 (Iio l)) :=
by simp [nhds_eq_order (⊥:α)]
section linear_order
variables [topological_space α] [linear_order α] [order_topology α]
lemma exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds' {a : α} {s : set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) {l : α} (hl : l < a) :
∃ l' ∈ Ico l a, Ioc l' a ⊆ s :=
begin
rw [nhds_eq_order a] at hs,
rcases hs with ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, hts⟩,
-- First we show that `t₂` includes `(-∞, a]`, so it suffices to show `(l', ∞) ⊆ t₁`
suffices : ∃ l' ∈ Ico l a, Ioi l' ⊆ t₁,
{ have A : 𝓟 (Iic a) ≤ ⨅ b ∈ Ioi a, 𝓟 (Iio b),
from (le_infi $ λ b, le_infi $ λ hb, principal_mono.2 $ Iic_subset_Iio.2 hb),
have B : t₁ ∩ Iic a ⊆ s,
from subset.trans (inter_subset_inter_right _ (A ht₂)) hts,
from this.imp (λ l', Exists.imp $ λ hl' hl x hx, B ⟨hl hx.1, hx.2⟩) },
clear hts ht₂ t₂,
-- Now we find `l` such that `(l', ∞) ⊆ t₁`
letI := classical.DLO α,
rw [mem_binfi] at ht₁,
{ rcases ht₁ with ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩,
exact ⟨max b l, ⟨le_max_right _ _, max_lt hb hl⟩,
λ x hx, hb' $ Ioi_subset_Ioi (le_max_left _ _) hx⟩ },
{ intros b hb b' hb', simp only [mem_Iio] at hb hb',
use [max b b', max_lt hb hb'],
simp [le_refl] },
exact ⟨l, hl⟩
end
lemma exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds' {a : α} {s : set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) {u : α} (hu : a < u) :
∃ u' ∈ Ioc a u, Ico a u' ⊆ s :=
begin
convert @exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds' (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ hs _ hu,
ext, rw [dual_Ico, dual_Ioc]
end
lemma exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds {a : α} {s : set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h : ∃ l, l < a) :
∃ l < a, Ioc l a ⊆ s :=
let ⟨l', hl'⟩ := h in let ⟨l, hl⟩ := exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds' hs hl' in ⟨l, hl.fst.2, hl.snd⟩
lemma exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds {a : α} {s : set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h : ∃ u, a < u) :
∃ u (_ : a < u), Ico a u ⊆ s :=
let ⟨l', hl'⟩ := h in let ⟨l, hl⟩ := exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds' hs hl' in ⟨l, hl.fst.1, hl.snd⟩
lemma mem_nhds_unbounded {a : α} {s : set α} (hu : ∃u, a < u) (hl : ∃l, l < a) :
s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ (∃l u, l < a ∧ a < u ∧ ∀b, l < b → b < u → b ∈ s) :=
let ⟨l, hl'⟩ := hl, ⟨u, hu'⟩ := hu in
have 𝓝 a = (⨅p : {l // l < a} × {u // a < u}, 𝓟 (Ioo p.1.val p.2.val)),
by simp [nhds_order_unbounded hu hl, infi_subtype, infi_prod],
iff.intro
(assume hs, by rw [this] at hs; from infi_sets_induct hs
⟨l, u, hl', hu', by simp⟩
begin
intro p, rcases p with ⟨⟨l, hl⟩, ⟨u, hu⟩⟩,
simp [set.subset_def],
intros s₁ s₂ hs₁ l' hl' u' hu' hs₂,
letI := classical.DLO α,
refine ⟨max l l', _, min u u', _⟩;
simp [*, lt_min_iff, max_lt_iff] {contextual := tt}
end
(assume s₁ s₂ h ⟨l, u, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩, ⟨l, u, h₁, h₂, assume b hu hl, h $ h₃ _ hu hl⟩))
(assume ⟨l, u, hl, hu, h⟩,
by rw [this]; exact mem_infi_sets ⟨⟨l, hl⟩, ⟨u, hu⟩⟩ (assume b ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h b h₁ h₂))
lemma order_separated {a₁ a₂ : α} (h : a₁ < a₂) :
∃u v : set α, is_open u ∧ is_open v ∧ a₁ ∈ u ∧ a₂ ∈ v ∧ (∀b₁∈u, ∀b₂∈v, b₁ < b₂) :=
match dense_or_discrete a₁ a₂ with
| or.inl ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ := ⟨{a' | a' < a}, {a' | a < a'}, is_open_gt' a, is_open_lt' a, ha₁, ha₂,
assume b₁ h₁ b₂ h₂, lt_trans h₁ h₂⟩
| or.inr ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := ⟨{a | a < a₂}, {a | a₁ < a}, is_open_gt' a₂, is_open_lt' a₁, h, h,
assume b₁ hb₁ b₂ hb₂,
calc b₁ ≤ a₁ : h₂ _ hb₁
... < a₂ : h
... ≤ b₂ : h₁ _ hb₂⟩
end
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance order_topology.to_order_closed_topology : order_closed_topology α :=
{ is_closed_le' :=
is_open_prod_iff.mpr $ assume a₁ a₂ (h : ¬ a₁ ≤ a₂),
have h : a₂ < a₁, from lt_of_not_ge h,
let ⟨u, v, hu, hv, ha₁, ha₂, h⟩ := order_separated h in
⟨v, u, hv, hu, ha₂, ha₁, assume ⟨b₁, b₂⟩ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, not_le_of_gt $ h b₂ h₂ b₁ h₁⟩ }
lemma order_topology.t2_space : t2_space α := by apply_instance
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance order_topology.regular_space : regular_space α :=
{ regular := assume s a hs ha,
have hs' : sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 a, from mem_nhds_sets hs ha,
have ∃t:set α, is_open t ∧ (∀l∈ s, l < a → l ∈ t) ∧ 𝓝 a ⊓ 𝓟 t = ⊥,
from by_cases
(assume h : ∃l, l < a,
let ⟨l, hl, h⟩ := exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds hs' h in
match dense_or_discrete l a with
| or.inl ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩ := ⟨{a | a < b}, is_open_gt' _,
assume c hcs hca, show c < b,
from lt_of_not_ge $ assume hbc, h ⟨lt_of_lt_of_le hb₁ hbc, le_of_lt hca⟩ hcs,
inf_principal_eq_bot $ (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset (mem_nhds_sets (is_open_lt' _) hb₂) $
assume x (hx : b < x), show ¬ x < b, from not_lt.2 $ le_of_lt hx⟩
| or.inr ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := ⟨{a' | a' < a}, is_open_gt' _, assume b hbs hba, hba,
inf_principal_eq_bot $ (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset (mem_nhds_sets (is_open_lt' _) hl) $
assume x (hx : l < x), show ¬ x < a, from not_lt.2 $ h₁ _ hx⟩
end)
(assume : ¬ ∃l, l < a, ⟨∅, is_open_empty, assume l _ hl, (this ⟨l, hl⟩).elim,
by rw [principal_empty, inf_bot_eq]⟩),
let ⟨t₁, ht₁o, ht₁s, ht₁a⟩ := this in
have ∃t:set α, is_open t ∧ (∀u∈ s, u>a → u ∈ t) ∧ 𝓝 a ⊓ 𝓟 t = ⊥,
from by_cases
(assume h : ∃u, u > a,
let ⟨u, hu, h⟩ := exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds hs' h in
match dense_or_discrete a u with
| or.inl ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩ := ⟨{a | b < a}, is_open_lt' _,
assume c hcs hca, show c > b,
from lt_of_not_ge $ assume hbc, h ⟨le_of_lt hca, lt_of_le_of_lt hbc hb₂⟩ hcs,
inf_principal_eq_bot $ (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset (mem_nhds_sets (is_open_gt' _) hb₁) $
assume x (hx : b > x), show ¬ x > b, from not_lt.2 $ le_of_lt hx⟩
| or.inr ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := ⟨{a' | a' > a}, is_open_lt' _, assume b hbs hba, hba,
inf_principal_eq_bot $ (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset (mem_nhds_sets (is_open_gt' _) hu) $
assume x (hx : u > x), show ¬ x > a, from not_lt.2 $ h₂ _ hx⟩
end)
(assume : ¬ ∃u, u > a, ⟨∅, is_open_empty, assume l _ hl, (this ⟨l, hl⟩).elim,
by rw [principal_empty, inf_bot_eq]⟩),
let ⟨t₂, ht₂o, ht₂s, ht₂a⟩ := this in
⟨t₁ ∪ t₂, is_open_union ht₁o ht₂o,
assume x hx,
have x ≠ a, from assume eq, ha $ eq ▸ hx,
(ne_iff_lt_or_gt.mp this).imp (ht₁s _ hx) (ht₂s _ hx),
by rw [←sup_principal, inf_sup_left, ht₁a, ht₂a, bot_sup_eq]⟩,
..order_topology.t2_space }
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` if and only if it contains an interval `(l, u)` containing `a`,
provided `a` is neither a bottom element nor a top element. -/
lemma mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' {a l' u' : α} {s : set α}
(hl' : l' < a) (hu' : a < u') :
s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ ∃l u, a ∈ Ioo l u ∧ Ioo l u ⊆ s :=
begin
split,
{ assume h,
rcases exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds' h hu' with ⟨u, au, hu⟩,
rcases exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds' h hl' with ⟨l, la, hl⟩,
refine ⟨l, u, ⟨la.2, au.1⟩, λx hx, _⟩,
cases le_total a x with hax hax,
{ exact hu ⟨hax, hx.2⟩ },
{ exact hl ⟨hx.1, hax⟩ } },
{ rintros ⟨l, u, ha, h⟩,
apply mem_sets_of_superset (mem_nhds_sets is_open_Ioo ha) h }
end
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` if and only if it contains an interval `(l, u)` containing `a`. -/
lemma mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset [no_top_order α] [no_bot_order α] {a : α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ ∃l u, a ∈ Ioo l u ∧ Ioo l u ⊆ s :=
let ⟨l', hl'⟩ := no_bot a in let ⟨u', hu'⟩ := no_top a in mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' hl' hu'
lemma Iio_mem_nhds {a b : α} (h : a < b) : Iio b ∈ 𝓝 a :=
mem_nhds_sets is_open_Iio h
lemma Ioi_mem_nhds {a b : α} (h : a < b) : Ioi a ∈ 𝓝 b :=
mem_nhds_sets is_open_Ioi h
lemma Ioo_mem_nhds {a b x : α} (ha : a < x) (hb : x < b) : Ioo a b ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_nhds_sets is_open_Ioo ⟨ha, hb⟩
lemma disjoint_nhds_at_top [no_top_order α] (x : α) :
disjoint (𝓝 x) at_top :=
begin
rw filter.disjoint_iff,
cases no_top x with a ha,
use [Iio a, Ici a, Iio_mem_nhds ha, mem_at_top a],
rw [inter_comm, Ici_inter_Iio, Ico_self]
end
@[simp] lemma inf_nhds_at_top [no_top_order α] (x : α) :
𝓝 x ⊓ at_top = ⊥ :=
disjoint_iff.1 (disjoint_nhds_at_top x)
lemma disjoint_nhds_at_bot [no_bot_order α] (x : α) :
disjoint (𝓝 x) at_bot :=
@disjoint_nhds_at_top (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ x
@[simp] lemma inf_nhds_at_bot [no_bot_order α] (x : α) :
𝓝 x ⊓ at_bot = ⊥ :=
@inf_nhds_at_top (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ x
lemma not_tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_at_top [no_top_order α]
{F : filter β} (hF : F ≠ ⊥) {f : β → α} (hf : tendsto f F at_top) (x : α) :
¬ tendsto f F (𝓝 x) :=
hf.not_tendsto hF (disjoint_nhds_at_top x).symm
lemma not_tendsto_at_top_of_tendsto_nhds [no_top_order α]
{F : filter β} (hF : F ≠ ⊥) {f : β → α} {x : α} (hf : tendsto f F (𝓝 x)) :
¬ tendsto f F at_top :=
hf.not_tendsto hF (disjoint_nhds_at_top x)
lemma not_tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_at_bot [no_bot_order α]
{F : filter β} (hF : F ≠ ⊥) {f : β → α} (hf : tendsto f F at_bot) (x : α) :
¬ tendsto f F (𝓝 x) :=
hf.not_tendsto hF (disjoint_nhds_at_bot x).symm
lemma not_tendsto_at_bot_of_tendsto_nhds [no_bot_order α]
{F : filter β} (hF : F ≠ ⊥) {f : β → α} {x : α} (hf : tendsto f F (𝓝 x)) :
¬ tendsto f F at_bot :=
hf.not_tendsto hF (disjoint_nhds_at_bot x)
/-!
### Neighborhoods to the left and to the right
Limits to the left and to the right of real functions are defined in terms of neighborhoods to
the left and to the right, either open or closed, i.e., members of `nhds_within a (Ioi a)` and
`nhds_wihin a (Ici a)` on the right, and similarly on the left. Such neighborhoods can be
characterized as the sets containing suitable intervals to the right or to the left of `a`.
We give now these characterizations. -/
-- NB: If you extend the list, append to the end please to avoid breaking the API
/-- The following statements are equivalent:
0. `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, +∞)`
1. `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, b]`
2. `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, b)`
3. `s` includes `(a, u)` for some `u ∈ (a, b]`
4. `s` includes `(a, u)` for some `u > a` -/
lemma tfae_mem_nhds_within_Ioi {a b : α} (hab : a < b) (s : set α) :
tfae [s ∈ nhds_within a (Ioi a), -- 0 : `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, +∞)`
s ∈ nhds_within a (Ioc a b), -- 1 : `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, b]`
s ∈ nhds_within a (Ioo a b), -- 2 : `s` is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, b)`
∃ u ∈ Ioc a b, Ioo a u ⊆ s, -- 3 : `s` includes `(a, u)` for some `u ∈ (a, b]`
∃ u ∈ Ioi a, Ioo a u ⊆ s] := -- 4 : `s` includes `(a, u)` for some `u > a`
begin
tfae_have : 1 → 2, from λ h, nhds_within_mono _ Ioc_subset_Ioi_self h,
tfae_have : 2 → 3, from λ h, nhds_within_mono _ Ioo_subset_Ioc_self h,
tfae_have : 4 → 5, from λ ⟨u, umem, hu⟩, ⟨u, umem.1, hu⟩,
tfae_have : 5 → 1,
{ rintros ⟨u, hau, hu⟩,
exact mem_nhds_within.2 ⟨Iio u, is_open_Iio, hau, by rwa [inter_comm, Ioi_inter_Iio]⟩ },
tfae_have : 3 → 4,
{ assume h,
rcases mem_nhds_within_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.1 h with ⟨v, va, hv⟩,
rcases exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds' va hab with ⟨u, au, hu⟩,
refine ⟨u, au, λx hx, _⟩,
refine hv ⟨hu ⟨le_of_lt hx.1, hx.2⟩, _⟩,
exact Ioo_subset_Ioo_right au.2 hx },
tfae_finish
end
@[simp] lemma nhds_within_Ioc_eq_nhds_within_Ioi {a b : α} (h : a < b) :
nhds_within a (Ioc a b) = nhds_within a (Ioi a) :=
filter.ext $ λ s, (tfae_mem_nhds_within_Ioi h s).out 1 0
@[simp] lemma nhds_within_Ioo_eq_nhds_within_Ioi {a b : α} (hu : a < b) :
nhds_within a (Ioo a b) = nhds_within a (Ioi a) :=
filter.ext $ λ s, (tfae_mem_nhds_within_Ioi hu s).out 2 0
lemma mem_nhds_within_Ioi_iff_exists_mem_Ioc_Ioo_subset {a u' : α} {s : set α} (hu' : a < u') :
s ∈ nhds_within a (Ioi a) ↔ ∃u ∈ Ioc a u', Ioo a u ⊆ s :=
(tfae_mem_nhds_within_Ioi hu' s).out 0 3
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `(a, u)`
with `a < u < u'`, provided `a` is not a top element. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' {a u' : α} {s : set α} (hu' : a < u') :
s ∈ nhds_within a (Ioi a) ↔ ∃u ∈ Ioi a, Ioo a u ⊆ s :=
(tfae_mem_nhds_within_Ioi hu' s).out 0 4
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `(a, u)`
with `a < u`. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioo_subset [no_top_order α] {a : α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ nhds_within a (Ioi a) ↔ ∃u ∈ Ioi a, Ioo a u ⊆ s :=
let ⟨u', hu'⟩ := no_top a in mem_nhds_within_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' hu'
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `(a, u]`
with `a < u`. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioc_subset [no_top_order α] [densely_ordered α]
{a : α} {s : set α} : s ∈ nhds_within a (Ioi a) ↔ ∃u ∈ Ioi a, Ioc a u ⊆ s :=
begin
rw mem_nhds_within_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioo_subset,
split,
{ rintros ⟨u, au, as⟩,
rcases dense au with ⟨v, hv⟩,
exact ⟨v, hv.1, λx hx, as ⟨hx.1, lt_of_le_of_lt hx.2 hv.2⟩⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨u, au, as⟩,
exact ⟨u, au, subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ioc_self as⟩ }
end
lemma Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Ioi {a b c : α} (H : b ∈ Ico a c) :
Ioo a c ∈ nhds_within b (Ioi b) :=
(mem_nhds_within_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' H.2).2 ⟨c, H.2, Ioo_subset_Ioo_left H.1⟩
lemma Ioc_mem_nhds_within_Ioi {a b c : α} (H : b ∈ Ico a c) :
Ioc a c ∈ nhds_within b (Ioi b) :=
mem_sets_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Ioi H) Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
lemma Ico_mem_nhds_within_Ioi {a b c : α} (H : b ∈ Ico a c) :
Ico a c ∈ nhds_within b (Ioi b) :=
mem_sets_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Ioi H) Ioo_subset_Ico_self
lemma Icc_mem_nhds_within_Ioi {a b c : α} (H : b ∈ Ico a c) :
Icc a c ∈ nhds_within b (Ioi b) :=
mem_sets_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Ioi H) Ioo_subset_Icc_self
/-- The following statements are equivalent:
0. `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(-∞, b)`
1. `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `[a, b)`
2. `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(a, b)`
3. `s` includes `(l, b)` for some `l ∈ [a, b)`
4. `s` includes `(l, b)` for some `l < b` -/
lemma tfae_mem_nhds_within_Iio {a b : α} (h : a < b) (s : set α) :
tfae [s ∈ nhds_within b (Iio b), -- 0 : `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(-∞, b)`
s ∈ nhds_within b (Ico a b), -- 1 : `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `[a, b)`
s ∈ nhds_within b (Ioo a b), -- 2 : `s` is a neighborhood of `b` within `(a, b)`
∃ l ∈ Ico a b, Ioo l b ⊆ s, -- 3 : `s` includes `(l, b)` for some `l ∈ [a, b)`
∃ l ∈ Iio b, Ioo l b ⊆ s] := -- 4 : `s` includes `(l, b)` for some `l < b`
begin
have := @tfae_mem_nhds_within_Ioi (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ h s,
-- If we call `convert` here, it generates wrong equations, so we need to simplify first
simp only [exists_prop] at this ⊢,
rw [dual_Ioi, dual_Ioc, dual_Ioo] at this,
convert this; ext l; rw [dual_Ioo]
end
@[simp] lemma nhds_within_Ico_eq_nhds_within_Iio {a b : α} (h : a < b) :
nhds_within b (Ico a b) = nhds_within b (Iio b) :=
filter.ext $ λ s, (tfae_mem_nhds_within_Iio h s).out 1 0
@[simp] lemma nhds_within_Ioo_eq_nhds_within_Iio {a b : α} (h : a < b) :
nhds_within b (Ioo a b) = nhds_within b (Iio b) :=
filter.ext $ λ s, (tfae_mem_nhds_within_Iio h s).out 2 0
lemma mem_nhds_within_Iio_iff_exists_mem_Ico_Ioo_subset {a l' : α} {s : set α} (hl' : l' < a) :
s ∈ nhds_within a (Iio a) ↔ ∃l ∈ Ico l' a, Ioo l a ⊆ s :=
(tfae_mem_nhds_within_Iio hl' s).out 0 3
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(-∞, a)` if and only if it contains an interval `(l, a)`
with `l < a`, provided `a` is not a bottom element. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Iio_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' {a l' : α} {s : set α} (hl' : l' < a) :
s ∈ nhds_within a (Iio a) ↔ ∃l ∈ Iio a, Ioo l a ⊆ s :=
(tfae_mem_nhds_within_Iio hl' s).out 0 4
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(-∞, a)` if and only if it contains an interval `(l, a)`
with `l < a`. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Iio_iff_exists_Ioo_subset [no_bot_order α] {a : α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ nhds_within a (Iio a) ↔ ∃l ∈ Iio a, Ioo l a ⊆ s :=
let ⟨l', hl'⟩ := no_bot a in mem_nhds_within_Iio_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' hl'
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(-∞, a)` if and only if it contains an interval `[l, a)`
with `l < a`. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Iio_iff_exists_Ico_subset [no_bot_order α] [densely_ordered α]
{a : α} {s : set α} : s ∈ nhds_within a (Iio a) ↔ ∃l ∈ Iio a, Ico l a ⊆ s :=
begin
convert @mem_nhds_within_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioc_subset (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ _ _ _,
simp only [dual_Ioc], refl
end
lemma Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Iio {a b c : α} (h : b ∈ Ioc a c) :
Ioo a c ∈ nhds_within b (Iio b) :=
(mem_nhds_within_Iio_iff_exists_Ioo_subset' h.1).2 ⟨a, h.1, Ioo_subset_Ioo_right h.2⟩
lemma Ioc_mem_nhds_within_Iio {a b c : α} (h : b ∈ Ioc a c) :
Ioc a c ∈ nhds_within b (Iio b) :=
mem_sets_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Iio h) Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
lemma Ico_mem_nhds_within_Iio {a b c : α} (h : b ∈ Ioc a c) :
Ico a c ∈ nhds_within b (Iio b) :=
mem_sets_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Iio h) Ioo_subset_Ico_self
lemma Icc_mem_nhds_within_Iio {a b c : α} (h : b ∈ Ioc a c) :
Icc a c ∈ nhds_within b (Iio b) :=
mem_sets_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhds_within_Iio h) Ioo_subset_Icc_self
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `[a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `[a, u)`
with `a < u`, provided `a` is not a top element. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Ici_iff_exists_Ico_subset' {a u' : α} {s : set α} (hu' : a < u') :
s ∈ nhds_within a (Ici a) ↔ ∃u, a < u ∧ Ico a u ⊆ s :=
begin
split,
{ assume h,
rcases mem_nhds_within_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.1 h with ⟨v, va, hv⟩,
rcases exists_Ico_subset_of_mem_nhds va ⟨u', hu'⟩ with ⟨u, au, hu⟩,
refine ⟨u, au, λx hx, _⟩,
refine hv ⟨_, hx.1⟩,
exact hu hx },
{ rintros ⟨u, au, hu⟩,
rw mem_nhds_within_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter,
refine ⟨Iio u, mem_nhds_sets is_open_Iio au, _⟩,
rwa [inter_comm, Ici_inter_Iio] }
end
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `[a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `[a, u)`
with `a < u`. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Ici_iff_exists_Ico_subset [no_top_order α] {a : α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ nhds_within a (Ici a) ↔ ∃u, a < u ∧ Ico a u ⊆ s :=
let ⟨u', hu'⟩ := no_top a in mem_nhds_within_Ici_iff_exists_Ico_subset' hu'
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `[a, +∞)` if and only if it contains an interval `[a, u]`
with `a < u`. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Ici_iff_exists_Icc_subset [no_top_order α] [densely_ordered α]
{a : α} {s : set α} : s ∈ nhds_within a (Ici a) ↔ ∃u, a < u ∧ Icc a u ⊆ s :=
begin
rw mem_nhds_within_Ici_iff_exists_Ico_subset,
split,
{ rintros ⟨u, au, as⟩,
rcases dense au with ⟨v, hv⟩,
exact ⟨v, hv.1, λx hx, as ⟨hx.1, lt_of_le_of_lt hx.2 hv.2⟩⟩ },
{ rintros ⟨u, au, as⟩,
exact ⟨u, au, subset.trans Ico_subset_Icc_self as⟩ }
end
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(-∞, a]` if and only if it contains an interval `(l, a]`
with `l < a`, provided `a` is not a bottom element. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Iic_iff_exists_Ioc_subset' {a l' : α} {s : set α} (hl' : l' < a) :
s ∈ nhds_within a (Iic a) ↔ ∃l, l < a ∧ Ioc l a ⊆ s :=
begin
split,
{ assume h,
rcases mem_nhds_within_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.1 h with ⟨v, va, hv⟩,
rcases exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds va ⟨l', hl'⟩ with ⟨l, la, hl⟩,
refine ⟨l, la, λx hx, _⟩,
refine hv ⟨_, hx.2⟩,
exact hl hx },
{ rintros ⟨l, la, ha⟩,
rw mem_nhds_within_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter,
refine ⟨Ioi l, mem_nhds_sets is_open_Ioi la, _⟩,
rwa [Ioi_inter_Iic] }
end
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(-∞, a]` if and only if it contains an interval `(l, a]`
with `l < a`. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Iic_iff_exists_Ioc_subset [no_bot_order α] {a : α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ nhds_within a (Iic a) ↔ ∃l, l < a ∧ Ioc l a ⊆ s :=
let ⟨l', hl'⟩ := no_bot a in mem_nhds_within_Iic_iff_exists_Ioc_subset' hl'
/-- A set is a neighborhood of `a` within `(-∞, a]` if and only if it contains an interval `[l, a]`
with `l < a`. -/
lemma mem_nhds_within_Iic_iff_exists_Icc_subset [no_bot_order α] [densely_ordered α]
{a : α} {s : set α} : s ∈ nhds_within a (Iic a) ↔ ∃l, l < a ∧ Icc l a ⊆ s :=
begin
rw mem_nhds_within_Iic_iff_exists_Ioc_subset,
split,
{ rintros ⟨l, la, as⟩,
rcases dense la with ⟨v, hv⟩,
refine ⟨v, hv.2, λx hx, as ⟨lt_of_lt_of_le hv.1 hx.1, hx.2⟩⟩, },
{ rintros ⟨l, la, as⟩,
exact ⟨l, la, subset.trans Ioc_subset_Icc_self as⟩ }
end
end linear_order
lemma preimage_neg [add_group α] : preimage (has_neg.neg : α → α) = image (has_neg.neg : α → α) :=
(image_eq_preimage_of_inverse neg_neg neg_neg).symm
lemma filter.map_neg [add_group α] : map (has_neg.neg : α → α) = comap (has_neg.neg : α → α) :=
funext $ assume f, map_eq_comap_of_inverse (funext neg_neg) (funext neg_neg)
section topological_add_group
variables [topological_space α] [ordered_add_comm_group α] [topological_add_group α]
lemma neg_preimage_closure {s : set α} : (λr:α, -r) ⁻¹' closure s = closure ((λr:α, -r) '' s) :=
have (λr:α, -r) ∘ (λr:α, -r) = id, from funext neg_neg,
by rw [preimage_neg]; exact
(subset.antisymm (image_closure_subset_closure_image continuous_neg) $
calc closure ((λ (r : α), -r) '' s) = (λr, -r) '' ((λr, -r) '' closure ((λ (r : α), -r) '' s)) :
by rw [←image_comp, this, image_id]
... ⊆ (λr, -r) '' closure ((λr, -r) '' ((λ (r : α), -r) '' s)) :
monotone_image $ image_closure_subset_closure_image continuous_neg
... = _ : by rw [←image_comp, this, image_id])
end topological_add_group
section order_topology
variables [topological_space α] [topological_space β]
[linear_order α] [linear_order β] [order_topology α] [order_topology β]
lemma is_lub.nhds_within_ne_bot {a : α} {s : set α} (ha : is_lub s a) (hs : s.nonempty) :
nhds_within a s ≠ ⊥ :=
let ⟨a', ha'⟩ := hs in
forall_sets_nonempty_iff_ne_bot.mp $ assume t ht,
let ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, ht⟩ := mem_inf_sets.mp ht in
by_cases
(assume h : a = a',
have a ∈ t₁, from mem_of_nhds ht₁,
have a ∈ t₂, from ht₂ $ by rwa [h],
⟨a, ht ⟨‹a ∈ t₁›, ‹a ∈ t₂›⟩⟩)
(assume : a ≠ a',
have a' < a, from lt_of_le_of_ne (ha.left ‹a' ∈ s›) this.symm,
let ⟨l, hl, hlt₁⟩ := exists_Ioc_subset_of_mem_nhds ht₁ ⟨a', this⟩ in
have ∃a'∈s, l < a',
from classical.by_contradiction $ assume : ¬ ∃a'∈s, l < a',
have ∀a'∈s, a' ≤ l, from assume a ha, not_lt.1 $ assume ha', this ⟨a, ha, ha'⟩,
have ¬ l < a, from not_lt.2 $ ha.right this,
this ‹l < a›,
let ⟨a', ha', ha'l⟩ := this in
have a' ∈ t₁, from hlt₁ ⟨‹l < a'›, ha.left ha'⟩,
⟨a', ht ⟨‹a' ∈ t₁›, ht₂ ‹a' ∈ s›⟩⟩)
lemma is_glb.nhds_within_ne_bot : ∀ {a : α} {s : set α}, is_glb s a → s.nonempty →
nhds_within a s ≠ ⊥ :=
@is_lub.nhds_within_ne_bot (order_dual α) _ _ _
lemma is_lub_of_mem_nhds {s : set α} {a : α} {f : filter α}
(hsa : a ∈ upper_bounds s) (hsf : s ∈ f) (hfa : f ⊓ 𝓝 a ≠ ⊥) : is_lub s a :=
⟨hsa, assume b hb,
not_lt.1 $ assume hba,
have s ∩ {a | b < a} ∈ f ⊓ 𝓝 a,
from inter_mem_inf_sets hsf (mem_nhds_sets (is_open_lt' _) hba),
let ⟨x, ⟨hxs, hxb⟩⟩ := nonempty_of_mem_sets hfa this in
have b < b, from lt_of_lt_of_le hxb $ hb hxs,
lt_irrefl b this⟩
lemma is_glb_of_mem_nhds : ∀ {s : set α} {a : α} {f : filter α},
a ∈ lower_bounds s → s ∈ f → f ⊓ 𝓝 a ≠ ⊥ → is_glb s a :=
@is_lub_of_mem_nhds (order_dual α) _ _ _
lemma is_lub_of_is_lub_of_tendsto {f : α → β} {s : set α} {a : α} {b : β}
(hf : ∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, x ≤ y → f x ≤ f y) (ha : is_lub s a) (hs : s.nonempty)
(hb : tendsto f (nhds_within a s) (𝓝 b)) : is_lub (f '' s) b :=
have hnbot : nhds_within a s ≠ ⊥, from ha.nhds_within_ne_bot hs,
have ∀a'∈s, ¬ b < f a',
from assume a' ha' h,
have ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 b, x < f a', from mem_nhds_sets (is_open_gt' _) h,
let ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, hs⟩ := mem_inf_sets.mp (hb this) in
by_cases
(assume h : a = a',
have a ∈ t₁ ∩ t₂, from ⟨mem_of_nhds ht₁, ht₂ $ by rwa [h]⟩,
have f a < f a', from hs this,
lt_irrefl (f a') $ by rwa [h] at this)
(assume h : a ≠ a',
have a' < a, from lt_of_le_of_ne (ha.left ha') h.symm,
have {x | a' < x} ∈ 𝓝 a, from mem_nhds_sets (is_open_lt' _) this,
have {x | a' < x} ∩ t₁ ∈ 𝓝 a, from inter_mem_sets this ht₁,
have ({x | a' < x} ∩ t₁) ∩ s ∈ 𝓝 a ⊓ 𝓟 s,
from inter_mem_inf_sets this (subset.refl s),
let ⟨x, ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩, hx₃⟩ := nonempty_of_mem_sets hnbot this in
have hxa' : f x < f a', from hs ⟨hx₂, ht₂ hx₃⟩,
have ha'x : f a' ≤ f x, from hf _ ha' _ hx₃ $ le_of_lt hx₁,
lt_irrefl _ (lt_of_le_of_lt ha'x hxa')),
and.intro
(assume b' ⟨a', ha', h_eq⟩, h_eq ▸ not_lt.1 $ this _ ha')
(assume b' hb', le_of_tendsto hnbot hb $
mem_inf_sets_of_right $ assume x hx, hb' $ mem_image_of_mem _ hx)
lemma is_glb_of_is_glb_of_tendsto {f : α → β} {s : set α} {a : α} {b : β}
(hf : ∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, x ≤ y → f x ≤ f y) : is_glb s a → s.nonempty →
tendsto f (nhds_within a s) (𝓝 b) → is_glb (f '' s) b :=
@is_lub_of_is_lub_of_tendsto (order_dual α) (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _ _ f s a b
(λ x hx y hy, hf y hy x hx)
lemma is_glb_of_is_lub_of_tendsto : ∀ {f : α → β} {s : set α} {a : α} {b : β},
(∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, x ≤ y → f y ≤ f x) → is_lub s a → s.nonempty →
tendsto f (𝓝 a ⊓ 𝓟 s) (𝓝 b) → is_glb (f '' s) b :=
@is_lub_of_is_lub_of_tendsto α (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _ _
lemma is_lub_of_is_glb_of_tendsto : ∀ {f : α → β} {s : set α} {a : α} {b : β},
(∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, x ≤ y → f y ≤ f x) → is_glb s a → s.nonempty →
tendsto f (𝓝 a ⊓ 𝓟 s) (𝓝 b) → is_lub (f '' s) b :=
@is_glb_of_is_glb_of_tendsto α (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _ _
lemma mem_closure_of_is_lub {a : α} {s : set α} (ha : is_lub s a) (hs : s.nonempty) :
a ∈ closure s :=
by rw closure_eq_cluster_pts; exact ha.nhds_within_ne_bot hs
lemma mem_of_is_lub_of_is_closed {a : α} {s : set α} (ha : is_lub s a) (hs : s.nonempty)
(sc : is_closed s) : a ∈ s :=
by rw ←sc.closure_eq; exact mem_closure_of_is_lub ha hs
lemma mem_closure_of_is_glb {a : α} {s : set α} (ha : is_glb s a) (hs : s.nonempty) :
a ∈ closure s :=
by rw closure_eq_cluster_pts; exact ha.nhds_within_ne_bot hs
lemma mem_of_is_glb_of_is_closed {a : α} {s : set α} (ha : is_glb s a) (hs : s.nonempty)
(sc : is_closed s) : a ∈ s :=
by rw ←sc.closure_eq; exact mem_closure_of_is_glb ha hs
/-- A compact set is bounded below -/
lemma compact.bdd_below {α : Type u} [topological_space α] [linear_order α]
[order_closed_topology α] [nonempty α] {s : set α} (hs : compact s) : bdd_below s :=
begin
by_contra H,
letI := classical.DLO α,
rcases hs.elim_finite_subcover_image (λ x (_ : x ∈ s), @is_open_Ioi _ _ _ _ x) _
with ⟨t, st, ft, ht⟩,
{ refine H (ft.bdd_below.imp $ λ C hC y hy, _),
rcases mem_bUnion_iff.1 (ht hy) with ⟨x, hx, xy⟩,
exact le_trans (hC hx) (le_of_lt xy) },
{ refine λ x hx, mem_bUnion_iff.2 (not_imp_comm.1 _ H),
exact λ h, ⟨x, λ y hy, le_of_not_lt (h.imp $ λ ys, ⟨_, hy, ys⟩)⟩ }
end
/-- A compact set is bounded above -/
lemma compact.bdd_above {α : Type u} [topological_space α] [linear_order α]
[order_topology α] : Π [nonempty α] {s : set α}, compact s → bdd_above s :=
@compact.bdd_below (order_dual α) _ _ _
end order_topology
section linear_order
variables [topological_space α] [linear_order α] [order_topology α] [densely_ordered α]
/-- The closure of the interval `(a, +∞)` is the closed interval `[a, +∞)`, unless `a` is a top
element. -/
lemma closure_Ioi' {a b : α} (hab : a < b) :
closure (Ioi a) = Ici a :=
begin
apply subset.antisymm,
{ exact closure_minimal Ioi_subset_Ici_self is_closed_Ici },
{ assume x hx,
by_cases h : x = a,
{ rw h, exact mem_closure_of_is_glb is_glb_Ioi ⟨_, hab⟩ },
{ exact subset_closure (lt_of_le_of_ne hx (ne.symm h)) } }
end
/-- The closure of the interval `(a, +∞)` is the closed interval `[a, +∞)`. -/
lemma closure_Ioi (a : α) [no_top_order α] :
closure (Ioi a) = Ici a :=
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := no_top a in closure_Ioi' hb
/-- The closure of the interval `(-∞, a)` is the closed interval `(-∞, a]`, unless `a` is a bottom
element. -/
lemma closure_Iio' {a b : α} (hab : b < a) :
closure (Iio a) = Iic a :=
begin
apply subset.antisymm,
{ exact closure_minimal Iio_subset_Iic_self is_closed_Iic },
{ assume x hx,
by_cases h : x = a,
{ rw h, exact mem_closure_of_is_lub is_lub_Iio ⟨_, hab⟩ },
{ apply subset_closure, by simpa [h] using lt_or_eq_of_le hx } }
end
/-- The closure of the interval `(-∞, a)` is the interval `(-∞, a]`. -/
lemma closure_Iio (a : α) [no_bot_order α] :
closure (Iio a) = Iic a :=
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := no_bot a in closure_Iio' hb
/-- The closure of the open interval `(a, b)` is the closed interval `[a, b]`. -/
lemma closure_Ioo {a b : α} (hab : a < b) :
closure (Ioo a b) = Icc a b :=
begin
apply subset.antisymm,
{ exact closure_minimal Ioo_subset_Icc_self is_closed_Icc },
{ have hab' : (Ioo a b).nonempty, from nonempty_Ioo.2 hab,
assume x hx,
by_cases h : x = a,
{ rw h, exact mem_closure_of_is_glb (is_glb_Ioo hab) hab' },
by_cases h' : x = b,
{ rw h', refine mem_closure_of_is_lub (is_lub_Ioo hab) hab' },
exact subset_closure ⟨lt_of_le_of_ne hx.1 (ne.symm h), by simpa [h'] using lt_or_eq_of_le hx.2⟩ }
end
/-- The closure of the interval `(a, b]` is the closed interval `[a, b]`. -/
lemma closure_Ioc {a b : α} (hab : a < b) :
closure (Ioc a b) = Icc a b :=
begin
apply subset.antisymm,
{ exact closure_minimal Ioc_subset_Icc_self is_closed_Icc },
{ apply subset.trans _ (closure_mono Ioo_subset_Ioc_self),
rw closure_Ioo hab }
end
/-- The closure of the interval `[a, b)` is the closed interval `[a, b]`. -/
lemma closure_Ico {a b : α} (hab : a < b) :
closure (Ico a b) = Icc a b :=
begin
apply subset.antisymm,
{ exact closure_minimal Ico_subset_Icc_self is_closed_Icc },
{ apply subset.trans _ (closure_mono Ioo_subset_Ico_self),
rw closure_Ioo hab }
end
@[simp] lemma interior_Ici [no_bot_order α] {a : α} : interior (Ici a) = Ioi a :=
by rw [← compl_Iio, interior_compl, closure_Iio, compl_Iic]
@[simp] lemma interior_Iic [no_top_order α] {a : α} : interior (Iic a) = Iio a :=
by rw [← compl_Ioi, interior_compl, closure_Ioi, compl_Ici]
@[simp] lemma interior_Icc [no_bot_order α] [no_top_order α] {a b : α}:
interior (Icc a b) = Ioo a b :=
by rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, interior_inter, interior_Ici, interior_Iic, Ioi_inter_Iio]
@[simp] lemma interior_Ico [no_bot_order α] {a b : α} : interior (Ico a b) = Ioo a b :=
by rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, interior_inter, interior_Ici, interior_Iio, Ioi_inter_Iio]
@[simp] lemma interior_Ioc [no_top_order α] {a b : α} : interior (Ioc a b) = Ioo a b :=
by rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, interior_inter, interior_Ioi, interior_Iic, Ioi_inter_Iio]
lemma nhds_within_Ioi_ne_bot' {a b c : α} (H₁ : a < c) (H₂ : a ≤ b) :
nhds_within b (Ioi a) ≠ ⊥ :=
mem_closure_iff_nhds_within_ne_bot.1 $ by { rw [closure_Ioi' H₁], exact H₂ }
lemma nhds_within_Ioi_ne_bot [no_top_order α] {a b : α} (H : a ≤ b) :
nhds_within b (Ioi a) ≠ ⊥ :=
let ⟨c, hc⟩ := no_top a in nhds_within_Ioi_ne_bot' hc H
lemma nhds_within_Ioi_self_ne_bot' {a b : α} (H : a < b) :
nhds_within a (Ioi a) ≠ ⊥ :=
nhds_within_Ioi_ne_bot' H (le_refl a)
lemma nhds_within_Ioi_self_ne_bot [no_top_order α] (a : α) :
nhds_within a (Ioi a) ≠ ⊥ :=
nhds_within_Ioi_ne_bot (le_refl a)
lemma nhds_within_Iio_ne_bot' {a b c : α} (H₁ : a < c) (H₂ : b ≤ c) :
nhds_within b (Iio c) ≠ ⊥ :=
mem_closure_iff_nhds_within_ne_bot.1 $ by { rw [closure_Iio' H₁], exact H₂ }
lemma nhds_within_Iio_ne_bot [no_bot_order α] {a b : α} (H : a ≤ b) :
nhds_within a (Iio b) ≠ ⊥ :=
let ⟨c, hc⟩ := no_bot b in nhds_within_Iio_ne_bot' hc H
lemma nhds_within_Iio_self_ne_bot' {a b : α} (H : a < b) :
nhds_within b (Iio b) ≠ ⊥ :=
nhds_within_Iio_ne_bot' H (le_refl b)
lemma nhds_within_Iio_self_ne_bot [no_bot_order α] (a : α) :
nhds_within a (Iio a) ≠ ⊥ :=
nhds_within_Iio_ne_bot (le_refl a)
end linear_order
section complete_linear_order
variables [complete_linear_order α] [topological_space α] [order_topology α]
[complete_linear_order β] [topological_space β] [order_topology β] [nonempty γ]
lemma Sup_mem_closure {α : Type u} [topological_space α] [complete_linear_order α]
[order_topology α] {s : set α} (hs : s.nonempty) :
Sup s ∈ closure s :=
mem_closure_of_is_lub (is_lub_Sup _) hs
lemma Inf_mem_closure {α : Type u} [topological_space α] [complete_linear_order α]
[order_topology α] {s : set α} (hs : s.nonempty) :
Inf s ∈ closure s :=
mem_closure_of_is_glb (is_glb_Inf _) hs
lemma is_closed.Sup_mem {α : Type u} [topological_space α] [complete_linear_order α]
[order_topology α] {s : set α} (hs : s.nonempty) (hc : is_closed s) :
Sup s ∈ s :=
mem_of_is_lub_of_is_closed (is_lub_Sup _) hs hc
lemma is_closed.Inf_mem {α : Type u} [topological_space α] [complete_linear_order α]
[order_topology α] {s : set α} (hs : s.nonempty) (hc : is_closed s) :
Inf s ∈ s :=
mem_of_is_glb_of_is_closed (is_glb_Inf _) hs hc
/-- A monotone function continuous at the supremum of a nonempty set sends this supremum to
the supremum of the image of this set. -/
lemma map_Sup_of_continuous_at_of_monotone' {f : α → β} {s : set α} (Cf : continuous_at f (Sup s))
(Mf : monotone f) (hs : s.nonempty) :
f (Sup s) = Sup (f '' s) :=
--This is a particular case of the more general is_lub_of_is_lub_of_tendsto
(is_lub_of_is_lub_of_tendsto (λ x hx y hy xy, Mf xy) (is_lub_Sup _) hs $
tendsto_le_left inf_le_left Cf).Sup_eq.symm
/-- A monotone function `s` sending `bot` to `bot` and continuous at the supremum of a set sends
this supremum to the supremum of the image of this set. -/
lemma map_Sup_of_continuous_at_of_monotone {f : α → β} {s : set α} (Cf : continuous_at f (Sup s))
(Mf : monotone f) (fbot : f ⊥ = ⊥) :
f (Sup s) = Sup (f '' s) :=
begin
cases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h h,
{ simp [h, fbot] },
{ exact map_Sup_of_continuous_at_of_monotone' Cf Mf h }
end
/-- A monotone function continuous at the indexed supremum over a nonempty `Sort` sends this indexed
supremum to the indexed supremum of the composition. -/
lemma map_supr_of_continuous_at_of_monotone' {ι : Sort*} [nonempty ι] {f : α → β} {g : ι → α}
(Cf : continuous_at f (supr g)) (Mf : monotone f) :
f (⨆ i, g i) = ⨆ i, f (g i) :=
by rw [supr, map_Sup_of_continuous_at_of_monotone' Cf Mf (range_nonempty g), ← range_comp, supr]
/-- If a monotone function sending `bot` to `bot` is continuous at the indexed supremum over
a `Sort`, then it sends this indexed supremum to the indexed supremum of the composition. -/
lemma map_supr_of_continuous_at_of_monotone {ι : Sort*} {f : α → β} {g : ι → α}
(Cf : continuous_at f (supr g)) (Mf : monotone f) (fbot : f ⊥ = ⊥) :
f (⨆ i, g i) = ⨆ i, f (g i) :=
by rw [supr, map_Sup_of_continuous_at_of_monotone Cf Mf fbot, ← range_comp, supr]
/-- A monotone function continuous at the infimum of a nonempty set sends this infimum to
the infimum of the image of this set. -/
lemma map_Inf_of_continuous_at_of_monotone' {f : α → β} {s : set α} (Cf : continuous_at f (Inf s))
(Mf : monotone f) (hs : s.nonempty) :
f (Inf s) = Inf (f '' s) :=
@map_Sup_of_continuous_at_of_monotone' (order_dual α) (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _ _ f s Cf
Mf.order_dual hs
/-- A monotone function `s` sending `top` to `top` and continuous at the infimum of a set sends
this infimum to the infimum of the image of this set. -/
lemma map_Inf_of_continuous_at_of_monotone {f : α → β} {s : set α} (Cf : continuous_at f (Inf s))
(Mf : monotone f) (ftop : f ⊤ = ⊤) :
f (Inf s) = Inf (f '' s) :=
@map_Sup_of_continuous_at_of_monotone (order_dual α) (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _ _ f s Cf
Mf.order_dual ftop
/-- A monotone function continuous at the indexed infimum over a nonempty `Sort` sends this indexed
infimum to the indexed infimum of the composition. -/
lemma map_infi_of_continuous_at_of_monotone' {ι : Sort*} [nonempty ι] {f : α → β} {g : ι → α}
(Cf : continuous_at f (infi g)) (Mf : monotone f) :
f (⨅ i, g i) = ⨅ i, f (g i) :=
@map_supr_of_continuous_at_of_monotone' (order_dual α) (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _ _ ι _ f g Cf
Mf.order_dual
/-- If a monotone function sending `top` to `top` is continuous at the indexed infimum over
a `Sort`, then it sends this indexed infimum to the indexed infimum of the composition. -/
lemma map_infi_of_continuous_at_of_monotone {ι : Sort*} {f : α → β} {g : ι → α}
(Cf : continuous_at f (infi g)) (Mf : monotone f) (ftop : f ⊤ = ⊤) :
f (infi g) = infi (f ∘ g) :=
@map_supr_of_continuous_at_of_monotone (order_dual α) (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _ _ ι f g Cf
Mf.order_dual ftop
end complete_linear_order
section conditionally_complete_linear_order
variables [conditionally_complete_linear_order α] [topological_space α] [order_topology α]
[conditionally_complete_linear_order β] [topological_space β] [order_topology β] [nonempty γ]
lemma cSup_mem_closure {s : set α} (hs : s.nonempty) (B : bdd_above s) : Sup s ∈ closure s :=
mem_closure_of_is_lub (is_lub_cSup hs B) hs
lemma cInf_mem_closure {s : set α} (hs : s.nonempty) (B : bdd_below s) : Inf s ∈ closure s :=
mem_closure_of_is_glb (is_glb_cInf hs B) hs
lemma is_closed.cSup_mem {s : set α} (hc : is_closed s) (hs : s.nonempty) (B : bdd_above s) :
Sup s ∈ s :=
mem_of_is_lub_of_is_closed (is_lub_cSup hs B) hs hc
lemma is_closed.cInf_mem {s : set α} (hc : is_closed s) (hs : s.nonempty) (B : bdd_below s) :
Inf s ∈ s :=
mem_of_is_glb_of_is_closed (is_glb_cInf hs B) hs hc
/-- If a monotone function is continuous at the supremum of a nonempty bounded above set `s`,
then it sends this supremum to the supremum of the image of `s`. -/
lemma map_cSup_of_continuous_at_of_monotone {f : α → β} {s : set α} (Cf : continuous_at f (Sup s))
(Mf : monotone f) (ne : s.nonempty) (H : bdd_above s) :
f (Sup s) = Sup (f '' s) :=
begin
refine ((is_lub_cSup (ne.image f) (Mf.map_bdd_above H)).unique _).symm,
refine is_lub_of_is_lub_of_tendsto (λx hx y hy xy, Mf xy) (is_lub_cSup ne H) ne _,
exact tendsto_le_left inf_le_left Cf
end
/-- If a monotone function is continuous at the indexed supremum of a bounded function on
a nonempty `Sort`, then it sends this supremum to the supremum of the composition. -/
lemma map_csupr_of_continuous_at_of_monotone {f : α → β} {g : γ → α}
(Cf : continuous_at f (⨆ i, g i)) (Mf : monotone f) (H : bdd_above (range g)) :
f (⨆ i, g i) = ⨆ i, f (g i) :=
by rw [supr, map_cSup_of_continuous_at_of_monotone Cf Mf (range_nonempty _) H, ← range_comp, supr]
/-- If a monotone function is continuous at the infimum of a nonempty bounded below set `s`,
then it sends this infimum to the infimum of the image of `s`. -/
lemma map_cInf_of_continuous_at_of_monotone {f : α → β} {s : set α} (Cf : continuous_at f (Inf s))
(Mf : monotone f) (ne : s.nonempty) (H : bdd_below s) :
f (Inf s) = Inf (f '' s) :=
@map_cSup_of_continuous_at_of_monotone (order_dual α) (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _ _ f s Cf
Mf.order_dual ne H
/-- A continuous monotone function sends indexed infimum to indexed infimum in conditionally
complete linear order, under a boundedness assumption. -/
lemma map_cinfi_of_continuous_at_of_monotone {f : α → β} {g : γ → α}
(Cf : continuous_at f (⨅ i, g i)) (Mf : monotone f) (H : bdd_below (range g)) :
f (⨅ i, g i) = ⨅ i, f (g i) :=
@map_csupr_of_continuous_at_of_monotone (order_dual α) (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Cf Mf.order_dual H
/-- A bounded connected subset of a conditionally complete linear order includes the open interval
`(Inf s, Sup s)`. -/
lemma is_connected.Ioo_cInf_cSup_subset {s : set α} (hs : is_connected s) (hb : bdd_below s)
(ha : bdd_above s) :
Ioo (Inf s) (Sup s) ⊆ s :=
λ x hx, let ⟨y, ys, hy⟩ := (is_glb_lt_iff (is_glb_cInf hs.nonempty hb)).1 hx.1 in
let ⟨z, zs, hz⟩ := (lt_is_lub_iff (is_lub_cSup hs.nonempty ha)).1 hx.2 in
hs.Icc_subset ys zs ⟨le_of_lt hy, le_of_lt hz⟩
lemma eq_Icc_cInf_cSup_of_connected_bdd_closed {s : set α} (hc : is_connected s) (hb : bdd_below s)
(ha : bdd_above s) (hcl : is_closed s) :
s = Icc (Inf s) (Sup s) :=
subset.antisymm (subset_Icc_cInf_cSup hb ha) $
hc.Icc_subset (hcl.cInf_mem hc.nonempty hb) (hcl.cSup_mem hc.nonempty ha)
lemma is_preconnected.Ioi_cInf_subset {s : set α} (hs : is_preconnected s) (hb : bdd_below s)
(ha : ¬bdd_above s) :
Ioi (Inf s) ⊆ s :=
begin
have sne : s.nonempty := @nonempty_of_not_bdd_above α _ s ⟨Inf ∅⟩ ha,
intros x hx,
obtain ⟨y, ys, hy⟩ : ∃ y ∈ s, y < x := (is_glb_lt_iff (is_glb_cInf sne hb)).1 hx,
obtain ⟨z, zs, hz⟩ : ∃ z ∈ s, x < z := not_bdd_above_iff.1 ha x,
exact hs.Icc_subset ys zs ⟨le_of_lt hy, le_of_lt hz⟩
end
lemma is_preconnected.Iio_cSup_subset {s : set α} (hs : is_preconnected s) (hb : ¬bdd_below s)
(ha : bdd_above s) :
Iio (Sup s) ⊆ s :=
@is_preconnected.Ioi_cInf_subset (order_dual α) _ _ _ s hs ha hb
/-- A preconnected set in a conditionally complete linear order is either one of the intervals
`[Inf s, Sup s]`, `[Inf s, Sup s)`, `(Inf s, Sup s]`, `(Inf s, Sup s)`, `[Inf s, +∞)`,
`(Inf s, +∞)`, `(-∞, Sup s]`, `(-∞, Sup s)`, `(-∞, +∞)`, or `∅`. The converse statement requires
`α` to be densely ordererd. -/
lemma is_preconnected.mem_intervals {s : set α} (hs : is_preconnected s) :
s ∈ ({Icc (Inf s) (Sup s), Ico (Inf s) (Sup s), Ioc (Inf s) (Sup s), Ioo (Inf s) (Sup s),
Ici (Inf s), Ioi (Inf s), Iic (Sup s), Iio (Sup s), univ, ∅} : set (set α)) :=
begin
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl|hne,
{ apply_rules [or.inr, mem_singleton] },
have hs' : is_connected s := ⟨hne, hs⟩,
by_cases hb : bdd_below s; by_cases ha : bdd_above s,
{ rcases mem_Icc_Ico_Ioc_Ioo_of_subset_of_subset (hs'.Ioo_cInf_cSup_subset hb ha)
(subset_Icc_cInf_cSup hb ha) with hs|hs|hs|hs,
{ exact (or.inl hs) },
{ exact (or.inr $ or.inl hs) },
{ exact (or.inr $ or.inr $ or.inl hs) },
{ exact (or.inr $ or.inr $ or.inr $ or.inl hs) } },
{ refine (or.inr $ or.inr $ or.inr $ or.inr _),
cases mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset (hs.Ioi_cInf_subset hb ha) (λ x hx, cInf_le hb hx)
with hs hs,
{ exact or.inl hs },
{ exact or.inr (or.inl hs) } },
{ iterate 6 { apply or.inr },
cases mem_Iic_Iio_of_subset_of_subset (hs.Iio_cSup_subset hb ha) (λ x hx, le_cSup ha hx)
with hs hs,
{ exact or.inl hs },
{ exact or.inr (or.inl hs) } },
{ iterate 8 { apply or.inr },
exact or.inl (hs.eq_univ_of_unbounded hb ha) }
end
/-- A preconnected set is either one of the intervals `Icc`, `Ico`, `Ioc`, `Ioo`, `Ici`, `Ioi`,
`Iic`, `Iio`, or `univ`, or `∅`. The converse statement requires `α` to be densely ordererd. Though
one can represent `∅` as `(Inf s, Inf s)`, we include it into the list of possible cases to improve
readability. -/
lemma set_of_is_preconnected_subset_of_ordered :
{s : set α | is_preconnected s} ⊆
-- bounded intervals
(range (uncurry Icc) ∪ range (uncurry Ico) ∪ range (uncurry Ioc) ∪ range (uncurry Ioo)) ∪
-- unbounded intervals and `univ`
(range Ici ∪ range Ioi ∪ range Iic ∪ range Iio ∪ {univ, ∅}) :=
begin
intros s hs,
rcases hs.mem_intervals with hs|hs|hs|hs|hs|hs|hs|hs|hs|hs,
{ exact (or.inl $ or.inl $ or.inl $ or.inl ⟨(Inf s, Sup s), hs.symm⟩) },
{ exact (or.inl $ or.inl $ or.inl $ or.inr ⟨(Inf s, Sup s), hs.symm⟩) },
{ exact (or.inl $ or.inl $ or.inr ⟨(Inf s, Sup s), hs.symm⟩) },
{ exact (or.inl $ or.inr ⟨(Inf s, Sup s), hs.symm⟩) },
{ exact (or.inr $ or.inl $ or.inl $ or.inl $ or.inl ⟨Inf s, hs.symm⟩) },
{ exact (or.inr $ or.inl $ or.inl $ or.inl $ or.inr ⟨Inf s, hs.symm⟩) },
{ exact (or.inr $ or.inl $ or.inl $ or.inr ⟨Sup s, hs.symm⟩) },
{ exact (or.inr $ or.inl $ or.inr ⟨Sup s, hs.symm⟩) },
{ exact (or.inr $ or.inr $ or.inl hs) },
{ exact (or.inr $ or.inr $ or.inr hs) }
end
/-- A "continuous induction principle" for a closed interval: if a set `s` meets `[a, b]`
on a closed subset, contains `a`, and the set `s ∩ [a, b)` has no maximal point, then `b ∈ s`. -/
lemma is_closed.mem_of_ge_of_forall_exists_gt {a b : α} {s : set α} (hs : is_closed (s ∩ Icc a b))
(ha : a ∈ s) (hab : a ≤ b) (hgt : ∀ x ∈ s ∩ Ico a b, (s ∩ Ioc x b).nonempty) :
b ∈ s :=
begin
let S := s ∩ Icc a b,
replace ha : a ∈ S, from ⟨ha, left_mem_Icc.2 hab⟩,
have Sbd : bdd_above S, from ⟨b, λ z hz, hz.2.2⟩,
let c := Sup (s ∩ Icc a b),
have c_mem : c ∈ S, from hs.cSup_mem ⟨_, ha⟩ Sbd,
have c_le : c ≤ b, from cSup_le ⟨_, ha⟩ (λ x hx, hx.2.2),
cases eq_or_lt_of_le c_le with hc hc, from hc ▸ c_mem.1,
exfalso,
rcases hgt c ⟨c_mem.1, c_mem.2.1, hc⟩ with ⟨x, xs, cx, xb⟩,
exact not_lt_of_le (le_cSup Sbd ⟨xs, le_trans (le_cSup Sbd ha) (le_of_lt cx), xb⟩) cx
end
/-- A "continuous induction principle" for a closed interval: if a set `s` meets `[a, b]`
on a closed subset, contains `a`, and for any `a ≤ x < y ≤ b`, `x ∈ s`, the set `s ∩ (x, y]`
is not empty, then `[a, b] ⊆ s`. -/
lemma is_closed.Icc_subset_of_forall_exists_gt {a b : α} {s : set α} (hs : is_closed (s ∩ Icc a b))
(ha : a ∈ s) (hgt : ∀ x ∈ s ∩ Ico a b, ∀ y ∈ Ioi x, (s ∩ Ioc x y).nonempty) :
Icc a b ⊆ s :=
begin
assume y hy,
have : is_closed (s ∩ Icc a y),
{ suffices : s ∩ Icc a y = s ∩ Icc a b ∩ Icc a y,
{ rw this, exact is_closed_inter hs is_closed_Icc },
rw [inter_assoc],
congr,
exact (inter_eq_self_of_subset_right $ Icc_subset_Icc_right hy.2).symm },
exact is_closed.mem_of_ge_of_forall_exists_gt this ha hy.1
(λ x hx, hgt x ⟨hx.1, Ico_subset_Ico_right hy.2 hx.2⟩ y hx.2.2)
end
section densely_ordered
variables [densely_ordered α] {a b : α}
/-- A "continuous induction principle" for a closed interval: if a set `s` meets `[a, b]`
on a closed subset, contains `a`, and for any `x ∈ s ∩ [a, b)` the set `s` includes some open
neighborhood of `x` within `(x, +∞)`, then `[a, b] ⊆ s`. -/
lemma is_closed.Icc_subset_of_forall_mem_nhds_within {a b : α} {s : set α}
(hs : is_closed (s ∩ Icc a b)) (ha : a ∈ s)
(hgt : ∀ x ∈ s ∩ Ico a b, s ∈ nhds_within x (Ioi x)) :
Icc a b ⊆ s :=
begin
apply hs.Icc_subset_of_forall_exists_gt ha,
rintros x ⟨hxs, hxab⟩ y hyxb,
have : s ∩ Ioc x y ∈ nhds_within x (Ioi x),
from inter_mem_sets (hgt x ⟨hxs, hxab⟩) (Ioc_mem_nhds_within_Ioi ⟨le_refl _, hyxb⟩),
exact nonempty_of_mem_sets (nhds_within_Ioi_self_ne_bot' hxab.2) this
end
/-- A closed interval in a densely ordered conditionally complete linear order is preconnected. -/
lemma is_preconnected_Icc : is_preconnected (Icc a b) :=
is_preconnected_closed_iff.2
begin
rintros s t hs ht hab ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩,
wlog hxy : x ≤ y := le_total x y using [x y s t, y x t s],
have xyab : Icc x y ⊆ Icc a b := Icc_subset_Icc hx.1.1 hy.1.2,
by_contradiction hst,
suffices : Icc x y ⊆ s,
from hst ⟨y, xyab $ right_mem_Icc.2 hxy, this $ right_mem_Icc.2 hxy, hy.2⟩,
apply (is_closed_inter hs is_closed_Icc).Icc_subset_of_forall_mem_nhds_within hx.2,
rintros z ⟨zs, hz⟩,
have zt : z ∈ tᶜ, from λ zt, hst ⟨z, xyab $ Ico_subset_Icc_self hz, zs, zt⟩,
have : tᶜ ∩ Ioc z y ∈ nhds_within z (Ioi z),
{ rw [← nhds_within_Ioc_eq_nhds_within_Ioi hz.2],
exact mem_nhds_within.2 ⟨tᶜ, ht, zt, subset.refl _⟩},
apply mem_sets_of_superset this,
have : Ioc z y ⊆ s ∪ t, from λ w hw, hab (xyab ⟨le_trans hz.1 (le_of_lt hw.1), hw.2⟩),
exact λ w ⟨wt, wzy⟩, (this wzy).elim id (λ h, (wt h).elim)
end
lemma is_preconnected_iff_forall_Icc_subset {s : set α} :
is_preconnected s ↔ ∀ x y ∈ s, x ≤ y → Icc x y ⊆ s :=
⟨λ h x y hx hy hxy, h.Icc_subset hx hy, λ h, is_preconnected_of_forall_pair $ λ x y hx hy,
⟨Icc (min x y) (max x y), h (min x y) (max x y)
((min_choice x y).elim (λ h', by rwa h') (λ h', by rwa h'))
((max_choice x y).elim (λ h', by rwa h') (λ h', by rwa h')) min_le_max,
⟨min_le_left x y, le_max_left x y⟩, ⟨min_le_right x y, le_max_right x y⟩, is_preconnected_Icc⟩⟩
lemma is_preconnected_Ici : is_preconnected (Ici a) :=
is_preconnected_iff_forall_Icc_subset.2 $ λ x y hx hy hxy, (Icc_subset_Ici_iff hxy).2 hx
lemma is_preconnected_Iic : is_preconnected (Iic a) :=
is_preconnected_iff_forall_Icc_subset.2 $ λ x y hx hy hxy, (Icc_subset_Iic_iff hxy).2 hy
lemma is_preconnected_Iio : is_preconnected (Iio a) :=
is_preconnected_iff_forall_Icc_subset.2 $ λ x y hx hy hxy, (Icc_subset_Iio_iff hxy).2 hy
lemma is_preconnected_Ioi : is_preconnected (Ioi a) :=
is_preconnected_iff_forall_Icc_subset.2 $ λ x y hx hy hxy, (Icc_subset_Ioi_iff hxy).2 hx
lemma is_preconnected_Ioo : is_preconnected (Ioo a b) :=
is_preconnected_iff_forall_Icc_subset.2 $ λ x y hx hy hxy, (Icc_subset_Ioo_iff hxy).2 ⟨hx.1, hy.2⟩
lemma is_preconnected_Ioc : is_preconnected (Ioc a b) :=
is_preconnected_iff_forall_Icc_subset.2 $ λ x y hx hy hxy, (Icc_subset_Ioc_iff hxy).2 ⟨hx.1, hy.2⟩
lemma is_preconnected_Ico : is_preconnected (Ico a b) :=
is_preconnected_iff_forall_Icc_subset.2 $ λ x y hx hy hxy, (Icc_subset_Ico_iff hxy).2 ⟨hx.1, hy.2⟩
@[priority 100]
instance ordered_connected_space : preconnected_space α :=
⟨is_preconnected_iff_forall_Icc_subset.2 $ λ x y hx hy hxy, subset_univ _⟩
/-- In a dense conditionally complete linear order, the set of preconnected sets is exactly
the set of the intervals `Icc`, `Ico`, `Ioc`, `Ioo`, `Ici`, `Ioi`, `Iic`, `Iio`, `(-∞, +∞)`,
or `∅`. Though one can represent `∅` as `(Inf s, Inf s)`, we include it into the list of
possible cases to improve readability. -/
lemma set_of_is_preconnected_eq_of_ordered :
{s : set α | is_preconnected s} =
-- bounded intervals
(range (uncurry Icc) ∪ range (uncurry Ico) ∪ range (uncurry Ioc) ∪ range (uncurry Ioo)) ∪
-- unbounded intervals and `univ`
(range Ici ∪ range Ioi ∪ range Iic ∪ range Iio ∪ {univ, ∅}) :=
begin
refine subset.antisymm set_of_is_preconnected_subset_of_ordered _,
simp only [subset_def, -mem_range, forall_range_iff, uncurry, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib,
mem_union, mem_set_of_eq, insert_eq, mem_singleton_iff, forall_eq, forall_true_iff, and_true,
is_preconnected_Icc, is_preconnected_Ico, is_preconnected_Ioc,
is_preconnected_Ioo, is_preconnected_Ioi, is_preconnected_Iio, is_preconnected_Ici,
is_preconnected_Iic, is_preconnected_univ, is_preconnected_empty],
end
/--Intermediate Value Theorem for continuous functions on closed intervals, case `f a ≤ t ≤ f b`.-/
lemma intermediate_value_Icc {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → β} (hf : continuous_on f (Icc a b)) :
Icc (f a) (f b) ⊆ f '' (Icc a b) :=
is_preconnected_Icc.intermediate_value (left_mem_Icc.2 hab) (right_mem_Icc.2 hab) hf
/--Intermediate Value Theorem for continuous functions on closed intervals, case `f a ≥ t ≥ f b`.-/
lemma intermediate_value_Icc' {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → β} (hf : continuous_on f (Icc a b)) :
Icc (f b) (f a) ⊆ f '' (Icc a b) :=
is_preconnected_Icc.intermediate_value (right_mem_Icc.2 hab) (left_mem_Icc.2 hab) hf
end densely_ordered
lemma compact.Inf_mem {s : set α} (hs : compact s) (ne_s : s.nonempty) :
Inf s ∈ s :=
hs.is_closed.cInf_mem ne_s hs.bdd_below
lemma compact.Sup_mem {s : set α} (hs : compact s) (ne_s : s.nonempty) :
Sup s ∈ s :=
@compact.Inf_mem (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ hs ne_s
lemma compact.is_glb_Inf {s : set α} (hs : compact s) (ne_s : s.nonempty) :
is_glb s (Inf s) :=
is_glb_cInf ne_s hs.bdd_below
lemma compact.is_lub_Sup {s : set α} (hs : compact s) (ne_s : s.nonempty) :
is_lub s (Sup s) :=
@compact.is_glb_Inf (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ hs ne_s
lemma compact.is_least_Inf {s : set α} (hs : compact s) (ne_s : s.nonempty) :
is_least s (Inf s) :=
⟨hs.Inf_mem ne_s, (hs.is_glb_Inf ne_s).1⟩
lemma compact.is_greatest_Sup {s : set α} (hs : compact s) (ne_s : s.nonempty) :
is_greatest s (Sup s) :=
@compact.is_least_Inf (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ hs ne_s
lemma compact.exists_is_least {s : set α} (hs : compact s) (ne_s : s.nonempty) :
∃ x, is_least s x :=
⟨_, hs.is_least_Inf ne_s⟩
lemma compact.exists_is_greatest {s : set α} (hs : compact s) (ne_s : s.nonempty) :
∃ x, is_greatest s x :=
⟨_, hs.is_greatest_Sup ne_s⟩
lemma compact.exists_is_glb {s : set α} (hs : compact s) (ne_s : s.nonempty) :
∃ x ∈ s, is_glb s x :=
⟨_, hs.Inf_mem ne_s, hs.is_glb_Inf ne_s⟩
lemma compact.exists_is_lub {s : set α} (hs : compact s) (ne_s : s.nonempty) :
∃ x ∈ s, is_lub s x :=
⟨_, hs.Sup_mem ne_s, hs.is_lub_Sup ne_s⟩
lemma compact.exists_Inf_image_eq {α : Type u} [topological_space α]
{s : set α} (hs : compact s) (ne_s : s.nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : continuous_on f s) :
∃ x ∈ s, Inf (f '' s) = f x :=
let ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ := (hs.image_of_continuous_on hf).Inf_mem (ne_s.image f)
in ⟨x, hxs, hx.symm⟩
/-- The extreme value theorem: a continuous function realizes its minimum on a compact set -/
lemma compact.exists_forall_le {α : Type u} [topological_space α]
{s : set α} (hs : compact s) (ne_s : s.nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : continuous_on f s) :
∃x∈s, ∀y∈s, f x ≤ f y :=
begin
rcases hs.exists_Inf_image_eq ne_s hf with ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩,
refine ⟨x, hxs, λ y hy, _⟩,
rw ← hx,
exact ((hs.image_of_continuous_on hf).is_glb_Inf (ne_s.image f)).1 (mem_image_of_mem _ hy)
end
/-- The extreme value theorem: a continuous function realizes its maximum on a compact set -/
lemma compact.exists_forall_ge {α : Type u} [topological_space α]:
∀ {s : set α}, compact s → s.nonempty → ∀ {f : α → β}, continuous_on f s →
∃x∈s, ∀y∈s, f y ≤ f x :=
@compact.exists_forall_le (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _
lemma compact.exists_Sup_image_eq {α : Type u} [topological_space α]:
∀ {s : set α}, compact s → s.nonempty → ∀ {f : α → β}, continuous_on f s →
∃ x ∈ s, Sup (f '' s) = f x :=
@compact.exists_Inf_image_eq (order_dual β) _ _ _ _ _
lemma eq_Icc_of_connected_compact {s : set α} (h₁ : is_connected s) (h₂ : compact s) :
s = Icc (Inf s) (Sup s) :=
eq_Icc_cInf_cSup_of_connected_bdd_closed h₁ h₂.bdd_below h₂.bdd_above
h₂.is_closed
end conditionally_complete_linear_order
section liminf_limsup
section order_closed_topology
variables [semilattice_sup α] [topological_space α] [order_topology α]
lemma is_bounded_le_nhds (a : α) : (𝓝 a).is_bounded (≤) :=
match forall_le_or_exists_lt_sup a with
| or.inl h := ⟨a, eventually_of_forall _ h⟩
| or.inr ⟨b, hb⟩ := ⟨b, ge_mem_nhds hb⟩
end
lemma is_bounded_under_le_of_tendsto {f : filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α}
(h : tendsto u f (𝓝 a)) : f.is_bounded_under (≤) u :=
is_bounded_of_le h (is_bounded_le_nhds a)
@[nolint ge_or_gt] -- see Note [nolint_ge]
lemma is_cobounded_ge_nhds (a : α) : (𝓝 a).is_cobounded (≥) :=
is_cobounded_of_is_bounded nhds_ne_bot (is_bounded_le_nhds a)
@[nolint ge_or_gt] -- see Note [nolint_ge]
lemma is_cobounded_under_ge_of_tendsto {f : filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α}
(hf : f ≠ ⊥) (h : tendsto u f (𝓝 a)) : f.is_cobounded_under (≥) u :=
is_cobounded_of_is_bounded (map_ne_bot hf) (is_bounded_under_le_of_tendsto h)
end order_closed_topology
section order_closed_topology
variables [semilattice_inf α] [topological_space α] [order_topology α]
@[nolint ge_or_gt] -- see Note [nolint_ge]
lemma is_bounded_ge_nhds (a : α) : (𝓝 a).is_bounded (≥) :=
match forall_le_or_exists_lt_inf a with
| or.inl h := ⟨a, eventually_of_forall _ h⟩
| or.inr ⟨b, hb⟩ := ⟨b, le_mem_nhds hb⟩
end
@[nolint ge_or_gt] -- see Note [nolint_ge]
lemma is_bounded_under_ge_of_tendsto {f : filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α}
(h : tendsto u f (𝓝 a)) : f.is_bounded_under (≥) u :=
is_bounded_of_le h (is_bounded_ge_nhds a)
lemma is_cobounded_le_nhds (a : α) : (𝓝 a).is_cobounded (≤) :=
is_cobounded_of_is_bounded nhds_ne_bot (is_bounded_ge_nhds a)
lemma is_cobounded_under_le_of_tendsto {f : filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α}
(hf : f ≠ ⊥) (h : tendsto u f (𝓝 a)) : f.is_cobounded_under (≤) u :=
is_cobounded_of_is_bounded (map_ne_bot hf) (is_bounded_under_ge_of_tendsto h)
end order_closed_topology
section conditionally_complete_linear_order
variables [conditionally_complete_linear_order α]
theorem lt_mem_sets_of_Limsup_lt {f : filter α} {b} (h : f.is_bounded (≤)) (l : f.Limsup < b) :
∀ᶠ a in f, a < b :=
let ⟨c, (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, a ≤ c), hcb⟩ := exists_lt_of_cInf_lt h l in
mem_sets_of_superset h $ assume a hac, lt_of_le_of_lt hac hcb
@[nolint ge_or_gt] -- see Note [nolint_ge]
theorem gt_mem_sets_of_Liminf_gt : ∀ {f : filter α} {b}, f.is_bounded (≥) → f.Liminf > b →
∀ᶠ a in f, a > b :=
@lt_mem_sets_of_Limsup_lt (order_dual α) _
variables [topological_space α] [order_topology α]
/-- If the liminf and the limsup of a filter coincide, then this filter converges to
their common value, at least if the filter is eventually bounded above and below. -/
@[nolint ge_or_gt] -- see Note [nolint_ge]
theorem le_nhds_of_Limsup_eq_Liminf {f : filter α} {a : α}
(hl : f.is_bounded (≤)) (hg : f.is_bounded (≥)) (hs : f.Limsup = a) (hi : f.Liminf = a) :
f ≤ 𝓝 a :=
tendsto_order.2 $ and.intro
(assume b hb, gt_mem_sets_of_Liminf_gt hg $ hi.symm ▸ hb)
(assume b hb, lt_mem_sets_of_Limsup_lt hl $ hs.symm ▸ hb)
theorem Limsup_nhds (a : α) : Limsup (𝓝 a) = a :=
cInf_intro (is_bounded_le_nhds a)
(assume a' (h : {n : α | n ≤ a'} ∈ 𝓝 a), show a ≤ a', from @mem_of_nhds α _ a _ h)
(assume b (hba : a < b), show ∃c (h : {n : α | n ≤ c} ∈ 𝓝 a), c < b, from
match dense_or_discrete a b with
| or.inl ⟨c, hac, hcb⟩ := ⟨c, ge_mem_nhds hac, hcb⟩
| or.inr ⟨_, h⟩ := ⟨a, (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset (gt_mem_nhds hba) h, hba⟩
end)
theorem Liminf_nhds : ∀ (a : α), Liminf (𝓝 a) = a :=
@Limsup_nhds (order_dual α) _ _ _
/-- If a filter is converging, its limsup coincides with its limit. -/
theorem Liminf_eq_of_le_nhds {f : filter α} {a : α} (hf : f ≠ ⊥) (h : f ≤ 𝓝 a) : f.Liminf = a :=
have hb_ge : is_bounded (≥) f, from is_bounded_of_le h (is_bounded_ge_nhds a),
have hb_le : is_bounded (≤) f, from is_bounded_of_le h (is_bounded_le_nhds a),
le_antisymm
(calc f.Liminf ≤ f.Limsup : Liminf_le_Limsup hf hb_le hb_ge
... ≤ (𝓝 a).Limsup :
Limsup_le_Limsup_of_le h (is_cobounded_of_is_bounded hf hb_ge) (is_bounded_le_nhds a)
... = a : Limsup_nhds a)
(calc a = (𝓝 a).Liminf : (Liminf_nhds a).symm
... ≤ f.Liminf :
Liminf_le_Liminf_of_le h (is_bounded_ge_nhds a) (is_cobounded_of_is_bounded hf hb_le))
/-- If a filter is converging, its liminf coincides with its limit. -/
theorem Limsup_eq_of_le_nhds : ∀ {f : filter α} {a : α}, f ≠ ⊥ → f ≤ 𝓝 a → f.Limsup = a :=
@Liminf_eq_of_le_nhds (order_dual α) _ _ _
end conditionally_complete_linear_order
section complete_linear_order
variables [complete_linear_order α] [topological_space α] [order_topology α]
-- In complete_linear_order, the above theorems take a simpler form
/-- If the liminf and the limsup of a function coincide, then the limit of the function
exists and has the same value -/
theorem tendsto_of_liminf_eq_limsup {f : filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α}
(h : liminf f u = a ∧ limsup f u = a) : tendsto u f (𝓝 a) :=
le_nhds_of_Limsup_eq_Liminf is_bounded_le_of_top is_bounded_ge_of_bot h.2 h.1
/-- If a function has a limit, then its limsup coincides with its limit-/
theorem limsup_eq_of_tendsto {f : filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} (hf : f ≠ ⊥)
(h : tendsto u f (𝓝 a)) : limsup f u = a :=
Limsup_eq_of_le_nhds (map_ne_bot hf) h
/-- If a function has a limit, then its liminf coincides with its limit-/
theorem liminf_eq_of_tendsto {f : filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} (hf : f ≠ ⊥)
(h : tendsto u f (𝓝 a)) : liminf f u = a :=
Liminf_eq_of_le_nhds (map_ne_bot hf) h
end complete_linear_order
end liminf_limsup
end order_topology
@[nolint ge_or_gt] -- see Note [nolint_ge]
lemma order_topology_of_nhds_abs
{α : Type*} [decidable_linear_ordered_add_comm_group α] [topological_space α]
(h_nhds : ∀a:α, 𝓝 a = (⨅r>0, 𝓟 {b | abs (a - b) < r})) : order_topology α :=
order_topology.mk $ eq_of_nhds_eq_nhds $ assume a:α, le_antisymm_iff.mpr
begin
simp [infi_and, topological_space.nhds_generate_from,
h_nhds, le_infi_iff, -le_principal_iff, and_comm],
refine ⟨λ s ha b hs, _, λ r hr, _⟩,
{ rcases hs with rfl | rfl,
{ refine infi_le_of_le (a - b)
(infi_le_of_le (lt_sub_left_of_add_lt $ by simpa using ha) $
principal_mono.mpr $ assume c (hc : abs (a - c) < a - b), _),
have : a - c < a - b := lt_of_le_of_lt (le_abs_self _) hc,
exact lt_of_neg_lt_neg (lt_of_add_lt_add_left this) },
{ refine infi_le_of_le (b - a)
(infi_le_of_le (lt_sub_left_of_add_lt $ by simpa using ha) $
principal_mono.mpr $ assume c (hc : abs (a - c) < b - a), _),
have : abs (c - a) < b - a, {rw abs_sub; simpa using hc},
have : c - a < b - a := lt_of_le_of_lt (le_abs_self _) this,
exact lt_of_add_lt_add_right this } },
{ have h : {b | abs (a - b) < r} = {b | a - r < b} ∩ {b | b < a + r},
from set.ext (assume b,
by simp [abs_lt, sub_lt, lt_sub_iff_add_lt, sub_lt_iff_lt_add']; cc),
rw [h, ← inf_principal],
apply le_inf _ _,
{ exact infi_le_of_le {b : α | a - r < b} (infi_le_of_le (sub_lt_self a hr) $
infi_le_of_le (a - r) $ infi_le _ (or.inl rfl)) },
{ exact infi_le_of_le {b : α | b < a + r} (infi_le_of_le (lt_add_of_pos_right _ hr) $
infi_le_of_le (a + r) $ infi_le _ (or.inr rfl)) } }
end
lemma tendsto_at_top_supr_nat [topological_space α] [complete_linear_order α] [order_topology α]
(f : ℕ → α) (hf : monotone f) : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 (⨆i, f i)) :=
tendsto_order.2 $ and.intro
(assume a ha, let ⟨n, hn⟩ := lt_supr_iff.1 ha in
mem_at_top_sets.2 ⟨n, assume i hi, lt_of_lt_of_le hn (hf hi)⟩)
(assume a ha, univ_mem_sets' (assume n, lt_of_le_of_lt (le_supr _ n) ha))
lemma tendsto_at_top_infi_nat [topological_space α] [complete_linear_order α] [order_topology α]
(f : ℕ → α) (hf : ∀{n m}, n ≤ m → f m ≤ f n) : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 (⨅i, f i)) :=
@tendsto_at_top_supr_nat (order_dual α) _ _ _ _ @hf
lemma supr_eq_of_tendsto {α} [topological_space α] [complete_linear_order α] [order_topology α]
{f : ℕ → α} {a : α} (hf : monotone f) : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a) → supr f = a :=
tendsto_nhds_unique at_top_ne_bot (tendsto_at_top_supr_nat f hf)
lemma infi_eq_of_tendsto {α} [topological_space α] [complete_linear_order α] [order_topology α]
{f : ℕ → α} {a : α} (hf : ∀n m, n ≤ m → f m ≤ f n) : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a) → infi f = a :=
tendsto_nhds_unique at_top_ne_bot (tendsto_at_top_infi_nat f hf)
/-- $\lim_{x\to+\infty}|x|=+\infty$ -/
lemma tendsto_abs_at_top_at_top [decidable_linear_ordered_add_comm_group α] :
tendsto (abs : α → α) at_top at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_mono _ (λ n, le_abs_self _) tendsto_id
local notation `|` x `|` := abs x
@[nolint ge_or_gt] -- see Note [nolint_ge]
lemma decidable_linear_ordered_add_comm_group.tendsto_nhds
[decidable_linear_ordered_add_comm_group α] [topological_space α] [order_topology α] {β : Type*}
(f : β → α) (x : filter β) (a : α) :
filter.tendsto f x (nhds a) ↔ ∀ ε > (0 : α), ∀ᶠ b in x, |f b - a| < ε :=
begin
rw (show _, from @tendsto_order α), -- does not work without `show` for some reason
split,
{ rintros ⟨hyp_lt_a, hyp_gt_a⟩ ε ε_pos,
suffices : {b : β | f b - a < ε ∧ a - f b < ε} ∈ x, by simpa only [abs_sub_lt_iff],
have set1 : {b : β | a - f b < ε} ∈ x,
{ have : {b : β | a - ε < f b} ∈ x, from hyp_lt_a (a - ε) (sub_lt_self a ε_pos),
have : ∀ b, a - f b < ε ↔ a - ε < f b, by { intro _, exact sub_lt },
simpa only [this] },
have set2 : {b : β | f b - a < ε} ∈ x,
{ have : {b : β | a + ε > f b} ∈ x, from hyp_gt_a (a + ε) (lt_add_of_pos_right a ε_pos),
have : ∀ b, f b - a < ε ↔ a + ε > f b, by { intro _, exact sub_lt_iff_lt_add' },
simpa only [this] },
exact (x.inter_sets set2 set1) },
{ assume hyp_ε_pos,
split,
{ assume a' a'_lt_a,
let ε := a - a',
have : {b : β | |f b - a| < ε} ∈ x, from hyp_ε_pos ε (sub_pos.elim_right a'_lt_a),
have : {b : β | f b - a < ε ∧ a - f b < ε} ∈ x, by simpa only [abs_sub_lt_iff] using this,
have : {b : β | a - f b < ε} ∈ x, from x.sets_of_superset this (set.inter_subset_right _ _),
have : ∀ b, a' < f b ↔ a - f b < ε, by {intro b, rw [sub_lt, sub_sub_self] },
simpa only [this] },
{ assume a' a'_gt_a,
let ε := a' - a,
have : {b : β | |f b - a| < ε} ∈ x, from hyp_ε_pos ε (sub_pos.elim_right a'_gt_a),
have : {b : β | f b - a < ε ∧ a - f b < ε} ∈ x, by simpa only [abs_sub_lt_iff] using this,
have : {b : β | f b - a < ε} ∈ x, from x.sets_of_superset this (set.inter_subset_left _ _),
have : ∀ b, f b < a' ↔ f b - a < ε, by { intro b, simp [lt_sub_iff_add_lt] },
simpa only [this] }}
end
|
569dcd1184bcb263e6662f454ca74c9ce66fa25b | 5df84495ec6c281df6d26411cc20aac5c941e745 | /src/formal_ml/with_density_compose_eq_multiply_alone.lean | cb9a72fed13726dd79e822cffb6edde16d54a4ba | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | eric-wieser/formal-ml | e278df5a8df78aa3947bc8376650419e1b2b0a14 | 630011d19fdd9539c8d6493a69fe70af5d193590 | refs/heads/master | 1,681,491,589,256 | 1,612,642,743,000 | 1,612,642,743,000 | 360,114,136 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,618,998,189,000 | 1,618,998,188,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,904 | lean | import measure_theory.measurable_space
import measure_theory.integration
import measure_theory.borel_space
namespace measure_theory
namespace with_density
lemma compose_eq_multiply {Ω:Type*} [M:measurable_space Ω] (μ:measure_theory.measure Ω) (f g:Ω → ennreal) (H1:measurable f) (H2:measurable g):
∫⁻ a, g a ∂(μ.with_density f) = ∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ :=
begin
revert g,
apply measurable.ennreal_induction,
{
intros c s h_ms,
rw lintegral_indicator,
rw lintegral_const,
rw measure_theory.measure.restrict_apply,
have A1:∀ a, (f * s.indicator (λ _,c)) a = s.indicator (λ x, c * f x) a,
{intro a,rw mul_comm,simp},
rw lintegral_congr A1,
rw lintegral_indicator,
rw measure_theory.with_density_apply,
rw lintegral_const_mul,
repeat {simp [h_ms,H1,is_measurable.univ]},
},
{
intros g h B1 B2 B3 B4 B5,
simp,
rw lintegral_add,
have A1:∀ a, (f a) * ((g a) + (h a)) = (f * g ) a + (f * h) a,
{intro a,rw left_distrib,simp},
rw [(measure_theory.lintegral_congr A1), B4, B5, measure_theory.lintegral_add],
simp,
apply measurable.ennreal_mul H1 B2,
apply measurable.ennreal_mul H1 B3,
repeat {assumption},
},
{
intros g h_mea_g h_mg h_ind,
rw lintegral_supr,
have C1:(λ n:ℕ, ∫⁻ (a : Ω), (g n) a ∂μ.with_density f) =λ n, ∫⁻ (a : Ω), (f * (g n)) a ∂μ,
{apply funext,apply h_ind},
rw C1,
rw ← lintegral_supr,
simp,
have C2:∀ a, (⨆ (n : ℕ), f a * (g n) a) = (f a * ⨆ (n : ℕ), (g n) a),
{ intro a, rw ennreal.mul_supr},
rw lintegral_congr C2,
intro n,
apply measurable.ennreal_mul H1 (h_mea_g _),
intros n1 n2 A4 ω,
apply ennreal.mul_le_mul,
apply le_refl _,
apply h_mg,
apply A4,
intro n,
apply h_mea_g,
apply h_mg,
},
end
#check 2
end with_density
end measure_theory
|
f06f2d25b664cd8f472c9e788e049609c923fddf | ce89339993655da64b6ccb555c837ce6c10f9ef4 | /bluejam/topprover/02.lean | 4c2d09ca854c4ce352401f3a01db129b0565d855 | [] | no_license | zeptometer/LearnLean | ef32dc36a22119f18d843f548d0bb42f907bff5d | bb84d5dbe521127ba134d4dbf9559b294a80b9f7 | refs/heads/master | 1,625,710,824,322 | 1,601,382,570,000 | 1,601,382,570,000 | 195,228,870 | 2 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 62 | lean | example : ∀ (n m : ℕ), n + m = m + n :=
by exact add_comm
|
303184460bc7e3e0006c18f1885f074943838b61 | bbecf0f1968d1fba4124103e4f6b55251d08e9c4 | /src/logic/basic.lean | faa9c7c9dadf40a57006e67cd3a5e9f1a33ba1e1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | waynemunro/mathlib | e3fd4ff49f4cb43d4a8ded59d17be407bc5ee552 | 065a70810b5480d584033f7bbf8e0409480c2118 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,417,182,397 | 1,634,644,781,000 | 1,634,644,781,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 61,007 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import tactic.doc_commands
import tactic.reserved_notation
/-!
# Basic logic properties
This file is one of the earliest imports in mathlib.
## Implementation notes
Theorems that require decidability hypotheses are in the namespace "decidable".
Classical versions are in the namespace "classical".
In the presence of automation, this whole file may be unnecessary. On the other hand,
maybe it is useful for writing automation.
-/
open function
local attribute [instance, priority 10] classical.prop_decidable
section miscellany
/- We add the `inline` attribute to optimize VM computation using these declarations. For example,
`if p ∧ q then ... else ...` will not evaluate the decidability of `q` if `p` is false. -/
attribute [inline] and.decidable or.decidable decidable.false xor.decidable iff.decidable
decidable.true implies.decidable not.decidable ne.decidable
bool.decidable_eq decidable.to_bool
attribute [simp] cast_eq cast_heq
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
/-- An identity function with its main argument implicit. This will be printed as `hidden` even
if it is applied to a large term, so it can be used for elision,
as done in the `elide` and `unelide` tactics. -/
@[reducible] def hidden {α : Sort*} {a : α} := a
/-- Ex falso, the nondependent eliminator for the `empty` type. -/
def empty.elim {C : Sort*} : empty → C.
instance : subsingleton empty := ⟨λa, a.elim⟩
instance subsingleton.prod {α β : Type*} [subsingleton α] [subsingleton β] : subsingleton (α × β) :=
⟨by { intros a b, cases a, cases b, congr, }⟩
instance : decidable_eq empty := λa, a.elim
instance sort.inhabited : inhabited (Sort*) := ⟨punit⟩
instance sort.inhabited' : inhabited (default (Sort*)) := ⟨punit.star⟩
instance psum.inhabited_left {α β} [inhabited α] : inhabited (psum α β) := ⟨psum.inl (default _)⟩
instance psum.inhabited_right {α β} [inhabited β] : inhabited (psum α β) := ⟨psum.inr (default _)⟩
@[priority 10] instance decidable_eq_of_subsingleton
{α} [subsingleton α] : decidable_eq α
| a b := is_true (subsingleton.elim a b)
@[simp] lemma eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton {α : Sort*} [subsingleton α] (x y : α) :
x = y ↔ true :=
by cc
/-- If all points are equal to a given point `x`, then `α` is a subsingleton. -/
lemma subsingleton_of_forall_eq {α : Sort*} (x : α) (h : ∀ y, y = x) : subsingleton α :=
⟨λ a b, (h a).symm ▸ (h b).symm ▸ rfl⟩
lemma subsingleton_iff_forall_eq {α : Sort*} (x : α) : subsingleton α ↔ ∀ y, y = x :=
⟨λ h y, @subsingleton.elim _ h y x, subsingleton_of_forall_eq x⟩
-- TODO[gh-6025]: make this an instance once safe to do so
lemma subtype.subsingleton (α : Sort*) [subsingleton α] (p : α → Prop) : subsingleton (subtype p) :=
⟨λ ⟨x,_⟩ ⟨y,_⟩, have x = y, from subsingleton.elim _ _, by { cases this, refl }⟩
/-- Add an instance to "undo" coercion transitivity into a chain of coercions, because
most simp lemmas are stated with respect to simple coercions and will not match when
part of a chain. -/
@[simp] theorem coe_coe {α β γ} [has_coe α β] [has_coe_t β γ]
(a : α) : (a : γ) = (a : β) := rfl
theorem coe_fn_coe_trans
{α β γ} [has_coe α β] [has_coe_t_aux β γ] [has_coe_to_fun γ]
(x : α) : @coe_fn α _ x = @coe_fn β _ x := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_fn_coe_base
{α β} [has_coe α β] [has_coe_to_fun β]
(x : α) : @coe_fn α _ x = @coe_fn β _ x := rfl
theorem coe_sort_coe_trans
{α β γ} [has_coe α β] [has_coe_t_aux β γ] [has_coe_to_sort γ]
(x : α) : @coe_sort α _ x = @coe_sort β _ x := rfl
/--
Many structures such as bundled morphisms coerce to functions so that you can
transparently apply them to arguments. For example, if `e : α ≃ β` and `a : α`
then you can write `e a` and this is elaborated as `⇑e a`. This type of
coercion is implemented using the `has_coe_to_fun` type class. There is one
important consideration:
If a type coerces to another type which in turn coerces to a function,
then it **must** implement `has_coe_to_fun` directly:
```lean
structure sparkling_equiv (α β) extends α ≃ β
-- if we add a `has_coe` instance,
instance {α β} : has_coe (sparkling_equiv α β) (α ≃ β) :=
⟨sparkling_equiv.to_equiv⟩
-- then a `has_coe_to_fun` instance **must** be added as well:
instance {α β} : has_coe_to_fun (sparkling_equiv α β) :=
⟨λ _, α → β, λ f, f.to_equiv.to_fun⟩
```
(Rationale: if we do not declare the direct coercion, then `⇑e a` is not in
simp-normal form. The lemma `coe_fn_coe_base` will unfold it to `⇑↑e a`. This
often causes loops in the simplifier.)
-/
library_note "function coercion"
@[simp] theorem coe_sort_coe_base
{α β} [has_coe α β] [has_coe_to_sort β]
(x : α) : @coe_sort α _ x = @coe_sort β _ x := rfl
/-- `pempty` is the universe-polymorphic analogue of `empty`. -/
@[derive decidable_eq]
inductive {u} pempty : Sort u
/-- Ex falso, the nondependent eliminator for the `pempty` type. -/
def pempty.elim {C : Sort*} : pempty → C.
instance subsingleton_pempty : subsingleton pempty := ⟨λa, a.elim⟩
@[simp] lemma not_nonempty_pempty : ¬ nonempty pempty :=
assume ⟨h⟩, h.elim
@[simp] theorem forall_pempty {P : pempty → Prop} : (∀ x : pempty, P x) ↔ true :=
⟨λ h, trivial, λ h x, by cases x⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_pempty {P : pempty → Prop} : (∃ x : pempty, P x) ↔ false :=
⟨λ h, by { cases h with w, cases w }, false.elim⟩
lemma congr_arg_heq {α} {β : α → Sort*} (f : ∀ a, β a) : ∀ {a₁ a₂ : α}, a₁ = a₂ → f a₁ == f a₂
| a _ rfl := heq.rfl
lemma plift.down_inj {α : Sort*} : ∀ (a b : plift α), a.down = b.down → a = b
| ⟨a⟩ ⟨b⟩ rfl := rfl
-- missing [symm] attribute for ne in core.
attribute [symm] ne.symm
lemma ne_comm {α} {a b : α} : a ≠ b ↔ b ≠ a := ⟨ne.symm, ne.symm⟩
@[simp] lemma eq_iff_eq_cancel_left {b c : α} :
(∀ {a}, a = b ↔ a = c) ↔ (b = c) :=
⟨λ h, by rw [← h], λ h a, by rw h⟩
@[simp] lemma eq_iff_eq_cancel_right {a b : α} :
(∀ {c}, a = c ↔ b = c) ↔ (a = b) :=
⟨λ h, by rw h, λ h a, by rw h⟩
/-- Wrapper for adding elementary propositions to the type class systems.
Warning: this can easily be abused. See the rest of this docstring for details.
Certain propositions should not be treated as a class globally,
but sometimes it is very convenient to be able to use the type class system
in specific circumstances.
For example, `zmod p` is a field if and only if `p` is a prime number.
In order to be able to find this field instance automatically by type class search,
we have to turn `p.prime` into an instance implicit assumption.
On the other hand, making `nat.prime` a class would require a major refactoring of the library,
and it is questionable whether making `nat.prime` a class is desirable at all.
The compromise is to add the assumption `[fact p.prime]` to `zmod.field`.
In particular, this class is not intended for turning the type class system
into an automated theorem prover for first order logic. -/
class fact (p : Prop) : Prop := (out [] : p)
lemma fact.elim {p : Prop} (h : fact p) : p := h.1
lemma fact_iff {p : Prop} : fact p ↔ p := ⟨λ h, h.1, λ h, ⟨h⟩⟩
end miscellany
/-!
### Declarations about propositional connectives
-/
theorem false_ne_true : false ≠ true
| h := h.symm ▸ trivial
section propositional
variables {a b c d : Prop}
/-! ### Declarations about `implies` -/
instance : is_refl Prop iff := ⟨iff.refl⟩
instance : is_trans Prop iff := ⟨λ _ _ _, iff.trans⟩
theorem iff_of_eq (e : a = b) : a ↔ b := e ▸ iff.rfl
theorem iff_iff_eq : (a ↔ b) ↔ a = b := ⟨propext, iff_of_eq⟩
@[simp] lemma eq_iff_iff {p q : Prop} : (p = q) ↔ (p ↔ q) := iff_iff_eq.symm
@[simp] theorem imp_self : (a → a) ↔ true := iff_true_intro id
theorem imp_intro {α β : Prop} (h : α) : β → α := λ _, h
theorem imp_false : (a → false) ↔ ¬ a := iff.rfl
theorem imp_and_distrib {α} : (α → b ∧ c) ↔ (α → b) ∧ (α → c) :=
⟨λ h, ⟨λ ha, (h ha).left, λ ha, (h ha).right⟩,
λ h ha, ⟨h.left ha, h.right ha⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem and_imp : (a ∧ b → c) ↔ (a → b → c) :=
iff.intro (λ h ha hb, h ⟨ha, hb⟩) (λ h ⟨ha, hb⟩, h ha hb)
theorem iff_def : (a ↔ b) ↔ (a → b) ∧ (b → a) :=
iff_iff_implies_and_implies _ _
theorem iff_def' : (a ↔ b) ↔ (b → a) ∧ (a → b) :=
iff_def.trans and.comm
theorem imp_true_iff {α : Sort*} : (α → true) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro $ λ_, trivial
theorem imp_iff_right (ha : a) : (a → b) ↔ b :=
⟨λf, f ha, imp_intro⟩
theorem decidable.imp_iff_right_iff [decidable a] : ((a → b) ↔ b) ↔ (a ∨ b) :=
⟨λ H, (decidable.em a).imp_right $ λ ha', H.1 $ λ ha, (ha' ha).elim,
λ H, H.elim imp_iff_right $ λ hb, ⟨λ hab, hb, λ _ _, hb⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem imp_iff_right_iff : ((a → b) ↔ b) ↔ (a ∨ b) :=
decidable.imp_iff_right_iff
/-! ### Declarations about `not` -/
/-- Ex falso for negation. From `¬ a` and `a` anything follows. This is the same as `absurd` with
the arguments flipped, but it is in the `not` namespace so that projection notation can be used. -/
def not.elim {α : Sort*} (H1 : ¬a) (H2 : a) : α := absurd H2 H1
@[reducible] theorem not.imp {a b : Prop} (H2 : ¬b) (H1 : a → b) : ¬a := mt H1 H2
theorem not_not_of_not_imp : ¬(a → b) → ¬¬a :=
mt not.elim
theorem not_of_not_imp {a : Prop} : ¬(a → b) → ¬b :=
mt imp_intro
theorem dec_em (p : Prop) [decidable p] : p ∨ ¬p := decidable.em p
theorem dec_em' (p : Prop) [decidable p] : ¬p ∨ p := (dec_em p).swap
theorem em (p : Prop) : p ∨ ¬p := classical.em _
theorem em' (p : Prop) : ¬p ∨ p := (em p).swap
theorem or_not {p : Prop} : p ∨ ¬p := em _
section eq_or_ne
variables {α : Sort*} (x y : α)
theorem decidable.eq_or_ne [decidable (x = y)] : x = y ∨ x ≠ y := dec_em $ x = y
theorem decidable.ne_or_eq [decidable (x = y)] : x ≠ y ∨ x = y := dec_em' $ x = y
theorem eq_or_ne : x = y ∨ x ≠ y := em $ x = y
theorem ne_or_eq : x ≠ y ∨ x = y := em' $ x = y
end eq_or_ne
theorem by_contradiction {p} : (¬p → false) → p := decidable.by_contradiction
-- alias by_contradiction ← by_contra
theorem by_contra {p} : (¬p → false) → p := decidable.by_contradiction
/--
In most of mathlib, we use the law of excluded middle (LEM) and the axiom of choice (AC) freely.
The `decidable` namespace contains versions of lemmas from the root namespace that explicitly
attempt to avoid the axiom of choice, usually by adding decidability assumptions on the inputs.
You can check if a lemma uses the axiom of choice by using `#print axioms foo` and seeing if
`classical.choice` appears in the list.
-/
library_note "decidable namespace"
/--
As mathlib is primarily classical,
if the type signature of a `def` or `lemma` does not require any `decidable` instances to state,
it is preferable not to introduce any `decidable` instances that are needed in the proof
as arguments, but rather to use the `classical` tactic as needed.
In the other direction, when `decidable` instances do appear in the type signature,
it is better to use explicitly introduced ones rather than allowing Lean to automatically infer
classical ones, as these may cause instance mismatch errors later.
-/
library_note "decidable arguments"
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_not [decidable a] : ¬¬a ↔ a :=
iff.intro decidable.by_contradiction not_not_intro
/-- The Double Negation Theorem: `¬ ¬ P` is equivalent to `P`.
The left-to-right direction, double negation elimination (DNE),
is classically true but not constructively. -/
@[simp] theorem not_not : ¬¬a ↔ a := decidable.not_not
theorem of_not_not : ¬¬a → a := by_contra
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.of_not_imp [decidable a] (h : ¬ (a → b)) : a :=
decidable.by_contradiction (not_not_of_not_imp h)
theorem of_not_imp : ¬ (a → b) → a := decidable.of_not_imp
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_imp_symm [decidable a] (h : ¬a → b) (hb : ¬b) : a :=
decidable.by_contradiction $ hb ∘ h
theorem not.decidable_imp_symm [decidable a] : (¬a → b) → ¬b → a := decidable.not_imp_symm
theorem not.imp_symm : (¬a → b) → ¬b → a := not.decidable_imp_symm
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_imp_comm [decidable a] [decidable b] : (¬a → b) ↔ (¬b → a) :=
⟨not.decidable_imp_symm, not.decidable_imp_symm⟩
theorem not_imp_comm : (¬a → b) ↔ (¬b → a) := decidable.not_imp_comm
@[simp] theorem imp_not_self : (a → ¬a) ↔ ¬a := ⟨λ h ha, h ha ha, λ h _, h⟩
theorem decidable.not_imp_self [decidable a] : (¬a → a) ↔ a :=
by { have := @imp_not_self (¬a), rwa decidable.not_not at this }
@[simp] theorem not_imp_self : (¬a → a) ↔ a := decidable.not_imp_self
theorem imp.swap : (a → b → c) ↔ (b → a → c) :=
⟨swap, swap⟩
theorem imp_not_comm : (a → ¬b) ↔ (b → ¬a) :=
imp.swap
/-! ### Declarations about `xor` -/
@[simp] theorem xor_true : xor true = not := funext $ λ a, by simp [xor]
@[simp] theorem xor_false : xor false = id := funext $ λ a, by simp [xor]
theorem xor_comm (a b) : xor a b = xor b a := by simp [xor, and_comm, or_comm]
instance : is_commutative Prop xor := ⟨xor_comm⟩
@[simp] theorem xor_self (a : Prop) : xor a a = false := by simp [xor]
/-! ### Declarations about `and` -/
theorem and_congr_left (h : c → (a ↔ b)) : a ∧ c ↔ b ∧ c :=
and.comm.trans $ (and_congr_right h).trans and.comm
theorem and_congr_left' (h : a ↔ b) : a ∧ c ↔ b ∧ c := and_congr h iff.rfl
theorem and_congr_right' (h : b ↔ c) : a ∧ b ↔ a ∧ c := and_congr iff.rfl h
theorem not_and_of_not_left (b : Prop) : ¬a → ¬(a ∧ b) :=
mt and.left
theorem not_and_of_not_right (a : Prop) {b : Prop} : ¬b → ¬(a ∧ b) :=
mt and.right
theorem and.imp_left (h : a → b) : a ∧ c → b ∧ c :=
and.imp h id
theorem and.imp_right (h : a → b) : c ∧ a → c ∧ b :=
and.imp id h
lemma and.right_comm : (a ∧ b) ∧ c ↔ (a ∧ c) ∧ b :=
by simp only [and.left_comm, and.comm]
lemma and_and_and_comm (a b c d : Prop) : (a ∧ b) ∧ c ∧ d ↔ (a ∧ c) ∧ b ∧ d :=
by rw [←and_assoc, @and.right_comm a, and_assoc]
lemma and.rotate : a ∧ b ∧ c ↔ b ∧ c ∧ a :=
by simp only [and.left_comm, and.comm]
theorem and_not_self_iff (a : Prop) : a ∧ ¬ a ↔ false :=
iff.intro (assume h, (h.right) (h.left)) (assume h, h.elim)
theorem not_and_self_iff (a : Prop) : ¬ a ∧ a ↔ false :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨hna, ha⟩, hna ha) false.elim
theorem and_iff_left_of_imp {a b : Prop} (h : a → b) : (a ∧ b) ↔ a :=
iff.intro and.left (λ ha, ⟨ha, h ha⟩)
theorem and_iff_right_of_imp {a b : Prop} (h : b → a) : (a ∧ b) ↔ b :=
iff.intro and.right (λ hb, ⟨h hb, hb⟩)
@[simp] theorem and_iff_left_iff_imp {a b : Prop} : ((a ∧ b) ↔ a) ↔ (a → b) :=
⟨λ h ha, (h.2 ha).2, and_iff_left_of_imp⟩
@[simp] theorem and_iff_right_iff_imp {a b : Prop} : ((a ∧ b) ↔ b) ↔ (b → a) :=
⟨λ h ha, (h.2 ha).1, and_iff_right_of_imp⟩
@[simp] lemma iff_self_and {p q : Prop} : (p ↔ p ∧ q) ↔ (p → q) :=
by rw [@iff.comm p, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
@[simp] lemma iff_and_self {p q : Prop} : (p ↔ q ∧ p) ↔ (p → q) :=
by rw [and_comm, iff_self_and]
@[simp] lemma and.congr_right_iff : (a ∧ b ↔ a ∧ c) ↔ (a → (b ↔ c)) :=
⟨λ h ha, by simp [ha] at h; exact h, and_congr_right⟩
@[simp] lemma and.congr_left_iff : (a ∧ c ↔ b ∧ c) ↔ c → (a ↔ b) :=
by simp only [and.comm, ← and.congr_right_iff]
@[simp] lemma and_self_left : a ∧ a ∧ b ↔ a ∧ b :=
⟨λ h, ⟨h.1, h.2.2⟩, λ h, ⟨h.1, h.1, h.2⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma and_self_right : (a ∧ b) ∧ b ↔ a ∧ b :=
⟨λ h, ⟨h.1.1, h.2⟩, λ h, ⟨⟨h.1, h.2⟩, h.2⟩⟩
/-! ### Declarations about `or` -/
theorem or_congr_left (h : a ↔ b) : a ∨ c ↔ b ∨ c := or_congr h iff.rfl
theorem or_congr_right (h : b ↔ c) : a ∨ b ↔ a ∨ c := or_congr iff.rfl h
theorem or.right_comm : (a ∨ b) ∨ c ↔ (a ∨ c) ∨ b := by rw [or_assoc, or_assoc, or_comm b]
theorem or_of_or_of_imp_of_imp (h₁ : a ∨ b) (h₂ : a → c) (h₃ : b → d) : c ∨ d :=
or.imp h₂ h₃ h₁
theorem or_of_or_of_imp_left (h₁ : a ∨ c) (h : a → b) : b ∨ c :=
or.imp_left h h₁
theorem or_of_or_of_imp_right (h₁ : c ∨ a) (h : a → b) : c ∨ b :=
or.imp_right h h₁
theorem or.elim3 (h : a ∨ b ∨ c) (ha : a → d) (hb : b → d) (hc : c → d) : d :=
or.elim h ha (assume h₂, or.elim h₂ hb hc)
theorem or_imp_distrib : (a ∨ b → c) ↔ (a → c) ∧ (b → c) :=
⟨assume h, ⟨assume ha, h (or.inl ha), assume hb, h (or.inr hb)⟩,
assume ⟨ha, hb⟩, or.rec ha hb⟩
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.or_iff_not_imp_left [decidable a] : a ∨ b ↔ (¬ a → b) :=
⟨or.resolve_left, λ h, dite _ or.inl (or.inr ∘ h)⟩
theorem or_iff_not_imp_left : a ∨ b ↔ (¬ a → b) := decidable.or_iff_not_imp_left
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.or_iff_not_imp_right [decidable b] : a ∨ b ↔ (¬ b → a) :=
or.comm.trans decidable.or_iff_not_imp_left
theorem or_iff_not_imp_right : a ∨ b ↔ (¬ b → a) := decidable.or_iff_not_imp_right
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_imp_not [decidable a] : (¬ a → ¬ b) ↔ (b → a) :=
⟨assume h hb, decidable.by_contradiction $ assume na, h na hb, mt⟩
theorem not_imp_not : (¬ a → ¬ b) ↔ (b → a) := decidable.not_imp_not
@[simp] theorem or_iff_left_iff_imp : (a ∨ b ↔ a) ↔ (b → a) :=
⟨λ h hb, h.1 (or.inr hb), or_iff_left_of_imp⟩
@[simp] theorem or_iff_right_iff_imp : (a ∨ b ↔ b) ↔ (a → b) :=
by rw [or_comm, or_iff_left_iff_imp]
/-! ### Declarations about distributivity -/
/-- `∧` distributes over `∨` (on the left). -/
theorem and_or_distrib_left : a ∧ (b ∨ c) ↔ (a ∧ b) ∨ (a ∧ c) :=
⟨λ ⟨ha, hbc⟩, hbc.imp (and.intro ha) (and.intro ha),
or.rec (and.imp_right or.inl) (and.imp_right or.inr)⟩
/-- `∧` distributes over `∨` (on the right). -/
theorem or_and_distrib_right : (a ∨ b) ∧ c ↔ (a ∧ c) ∨ (b ∧ c) :=
(and.comm.trans and_or_distrib_left).trans (or_congr and.comm and.comm)
/-- `∨` distributes over `∧` (on the left). -/
theorem or_and_distrib_left : a ∨ (b ∧ c) ↔ (a ∨ b) ∧ (a ∨ c) :=
⟨or.rec (λha, and.intro (or.inl ha) (or.inl ha)) (and.imp or.inr or.inr),
and.rec $ or.rec (imp_intro ∘ or.inl) (or.imp_right ∘ and.intro)⟩
/-- `∨` distributes over `∧` (on the right). -/
theorem and_or_distrib_right : (a ∧ b) ∨ c ↔ (a ∨ c) ∧ (b ∨ c) :=
(or.comm.trans or_and_distrib_left).trans (and_congr or.comm or.comm)
@[simp] lemma or_self_left : a ∨ a ∨ b ↔ a ∨ b :=
⟨λ h, h.elim or.inl id, λ h, h.elim or.inl (or.inr ∘ or.inr)⟩
@[simp] lemma or_self_right : (a ∨ b) ∨ b ↔ a ∨ b :=
⟨λ h, h.elim id or.inr, λ h, h.elim (or.inl ∘ or.inl) or.inr⟩
/-! Declarations about `iff` -/
theorem iff_of_true (ha : a) (hb : b) : a ↔ b :=
⟨λ_, hb, λ _, ha⟩
theorem iff_of_false (ha : ¬a) (hb : ¬b) : a ↔ b :=
⟨ha.elim, hb.elim⟩
theorem iff_true_left (ha : a) : (a ↔ b) ↔ b :=
⟨λ h, h.1 ha, iff_of_true ha⟩
theorem iff_true_right (ha : a) : (b ↔ a) ↔ b :=
iff.comm.trans (iff_true_left ha)
theorem iff_false_left (ha : ¬a) : (a ↔ b) ↔ ¬b :=
⟨λ h, mt h.2 ha, iff_of_false ha⟩
theorem iff_false_right (ha : ¬a) : (b ↔ a) ↔ ¬b :=
iff.comm.trans (iff_false_left ha)
@[simp]
lemma iff_mpr_iff_true_intro {P : Prop} (h : P) : iff.mpr (iff_true_intro h) true.intro = h := rfl
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_or_of_imp [decidable a] (h : a → b) : ¬ a ∨ b :=
if ha : a then or.inr (h ha) else or.inl ha
theorem not_or_of_imp : (a → b) → ¬ a ∨ b := decidable.not_or_of_imp
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.imp_iff_not_or [decidable a] : (a → b) ↔ (¬ a ∨ b) :=
⟨decidable.not_or_of_imp, or.neg_resolve_left⟩
theorem imp_iff_not_or : (a → b) ↔ (¬ a ∨ b) := decidable.imp_iff_not_or
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.imp_or_distrib [decidable a] : (a → b ∨ c) ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
by simp [decidable.imp_iff_not_or, or.comm, or.left_comm]
theorem imp_or_distrib : (a → b ∨ c) ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) := decidable.imp_or_distrib
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.imp_or_distrib' [decidable b] : (a → b ∨ c) ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
by by_cases b; simp [h, or_iff_right_of_imp ((∘) false.elim)]
theorem imp_or_distrib' : (a → b ∨ c) ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) := decidable.imp_or_distrib'
theorem not_imp_of_and_not : a ∧ ¬ b → ¬ (a → b)
| ⟨ha, hb⟩ h := hb $ h ha
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_imp [decidable a] : ¬(a → b) ↔ a ∧ ¬b :=
⟨λ h, ⟨decidable.of_not_imp h, not_of_not_imp h⟩, not_imp_of_and_not⟩
theorem not_imp : ¬(a → b) ↔ a ∧ ¬b := decidable.not_imp
-- for monotonicity
lemma imp_imp_imp (h₀ : c → a) (h₁ : b → d) : (a → b) → (c → d) :=
assume (h₂ : a → b), h₁ ∘ h₂ ∘ h₀
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.peirce (a b : Prop) [decidable a] : ((a → b) → a) → a :=
if ha : a then λ h, ha else λ h, h ha.elim
theorem peirce (a b : Prop) : ((a → b) → a) → a := decidable.peirce _ _
theorem peirce' {a : Prop} (H : ∀ b : Prop, (a → b) → a) : a := H _ id
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_iff_not [decidable a] [decidable b] : (¬ a ↔ ¬ b) ↔ (a ↔ b) :=
by rw [@iff_def (¬ a), @iff_def' a]; exact and_congr decidable.not_imp_not decidable.not_imp_not
theorem not_iff_not : (¬ a ↔ ¬ b) ↔ (a ↔ b) := decidable.not_iff_not
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_iff_comm [decidable a] [decidable b] : (¬ a ↔ b) ↔ (¬ b ↔ a) :=
by rw [@iff_def (¬ a), @iff_def (¬ b)]; exact and_congr decidable.not_imp_comm imp_not_comm
theorem not_iff_comm : (¬ a ↔ b) ↔ (¬ b ↔ a) := decidable.not_iff_comm
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_iff : ∀ [decidable b], ¬ (a ↔ b) ↔ (¬ a ↔ b) :=
by intro h; cases h; simp only [h, iff_true, iff_false]
theorem not_iff : ¬ (a ↔ b) ↔ (¬ a ↔ b) := decidable.not_iff
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.iff_not_comm [decidable a] [decidable b] : (a ↔ ¬ b) ↔ (b ↔ ¬ a) :=
by rw [@iff_def a, @iff_def b]; exact and_congr imp_not_comm decidable.not_imp_comm
theorem iff_not_comm : (a ↔ ¬ b) ↔ (b ↔ ¬ a) := decidable.iff_not_comm
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.iff_iff_and_or_not_and_not [decidable b] :
(a ↔ b) ↔ (a ∧ b) ∨ (¬ a ∧ ¬ b) :=
by { split; intro h,
{ rw h; by_cases b; [left,right]; split; assumption },
{ cases h with h h; cases h; split; intro; { contradiction <|> assumption } } }
theorem iff_iff_and_or_not_and_not : (a ↔ b) ↔ (a ∧ b) ∨ (¬ a ∧ ¬ b) :=
decidable.iff_iff_and_or_not_and_not
lemma decidable.iff_iff_not_or_and_or_not [decidable a] [decidable b] :
(a ↔ b) ↔ ((¬a ∨ b) ∧ (a ∨ ¬b)) :=
begin
rw [iff_iff_implies_and_implies a b],
simp only [decidable.imp_iff_not_or, or.comm]
end
lemma iff_iff_not_or_and_or_not : (a ↔ b) ↔ ((¬a ∨ b) ∧ (a ∨ ¬b)) :=
decidable.iff_iff_not_or_and_or_not
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_and_not_right [decidable b] : ¬(a ∧ ¬b) ↔ (a → b) :=
⟨λ h ha, h.decidable_imp_symm $ and.intro ha, λ h ⟨ha, hb⟩, hb $ h ha⟩
theorem not_and_not_right : ¬(a ∧ ¬b) ↔ (a → b) := decidable.not_and_not_right
/-- Transfer decidability of `a` to decidability of `b`, if the propositions are equivalent.
**Important**: this function should be used instead of `rw` on `decidable b`, because the
kernel will get stuck reducing the usage of `propext` otherwise,
and `dec_trivial` will not work. -/
@[inline] def decidable_of_iff (a : Prop) (h : a ↔ b) [D : decidable a] : decidable b :=
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff D h
/-- Transfer decidability of `b` to decidability of `a`, if the propositions are equivalent.
This is the same as `decidable_of_iff` but the iff is flipped. -/
@[inline] def decidable_of_iff' (b : Prop) (h : a ↔ b) [D : decidable b] : decidable a :=
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff D h.symm
/-- Prove that `a` is decidable by constructing a boolean `b` and a proof that `b ↔ a`.
(This is sometimes taken as an alternate definition of decidability.) -/
def decidable_of_bool : ∀ (b : bool) (h : b ↔ a), decidable a
| tt h := is_true (h.1 rfl)
| ff h := is_false (mt h.2 bool.ff_ne_tt)
/-! ### De Morgan's laws -/
theorem not_and_of_not_or_not (h : ¬ a ∨ ¬ b) : ¬ (a ∧ b)
| ⟨ha, hb⟩ := or.elim h (absurd ha) (absurd hb)
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_and_distrib [decidable a] : ¬ (a ∧ b) ↔ ¬a ∨ ¬b :=
⟨λ h, if ha : a then or.inr (λ hb, h ⟨ha, hb⟩) else or.inl ha, not_and_of_not_or_not⟩
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_and_distrib' [decidable b] : ¬ (a ∧ b) ↔ ¬a ∨ ¬b :=
⟨λ h, if hb : b then or.inl (λ ha, h ⟨ha, hb⟩) else or.inr hb, not_and_of_not_or_not⟩
/-- One of de Morgan's laws: the negation of a conjunction is logically equivalent to the
disjunction of the negations. -/
theorem not_and_distrib : ¬ (a ∧ b) ↔ ¬a ∨ ¬b := decidable.not_and_distrib
@[simp] theorem not_and : ¬ (a ∧ b) ↔ (a → ¬ b) := and_imp
theorem not_and' : ¬ (a ∧ b) ↔ b → ¬a :=
not_and.trans imp_not_comm
/-- One of de Morgan's laws: the negation of a disjunction is logically equivalent to the
conjunction of the negations. -/
theorem not_or_distrib : ¬ (a ∨ b) ↔ ¬ a ∧ ¬ b :=
⟨λ h, ⟨λ ha, h (or.inl ha), λ hb, h (or.inr hb)⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ h, or.elim h h₁ h₂⟩
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.or_iff_not_and_not [decidable a] [decidable b] : a ∨ b ↔ ¬ (¬a ∧ ¬b) :=
by rw [← not_or_distrib, decidable.not_not]
theorem or_iff_not_and_not : a ∨ b ↔ ¬ (¬a ∧ ¬b) := decidable.or_iff_not_and_not
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.and_iff_not_or_not [decidable a] [decidable b] :
a ∧ b ↔ ¬ (¬ a ∨ ¬ b) :=
by rw [← decidable.not_and_distrib, decidable.not_not]
theorem and_iff_not_or_not : a ∧ b ↔ ¬ (¬ a ∨ ¬ b) := decidable.and_iff_not_or_not
end propositional
/-! ### Declarations about equality -/
section equality
variables {α : Sort*} {a b : α}
@[simp] theorem heq_iff_eq : a == b ↔ a = b :=
⟨eq_of_heq, heq_of_eq⟩
theorem proof_irrel_heq {p q : Prop} (hp : p) (hq : q) : hp == hq :=
have p = q, from propext ⟨λ _, hq, λ _, hp⟩,
by subst q; refl
theorem ne_of_mem_of_not_mem {α β} [has_mem α β] {s : β} {a b : α}
(h : a ∈ s) : b ∉ s → a ≠ b :=
mt $ λ e, e ▸ h
lemma ne_of_apply_ne {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) {x y : α} (h : f x ≠ f y) : x ≠ y :=
λ (w : x = y), h (congr_arg f w)
theorem eq_equivalence : equivalence (@eq α) :=
⟨eq.refl, @eq.symm _, @eq.trans _⟩
/-- Transport through trivial families is the identity. -/
@[simp]
lemma eq_rec_constant {α : Sort*} {a a' : α} {β : Sort*} (y : β) (h : a = a') :
(@eq.rec α a (λ a, β) y a' h) = y :=
by { cases h, refl, }
@[simp]
lemma eq_mp_eq_cast {α β : Sort*} (h : α = β) : eq.mp h = cast h := rfl
@[simp]
lemma eq_mpr_eq_cast {α β : Sort*} (h : α = β) : eq.mpr h = cast h.symm := rfl
@[simp]
lemma cast_cast : ∀ {α β γ : Sort*} (ha : α = β) (hb : β = γ) (a : α),
cast hb (cast ha a) = cast (ha.trans hb) a
| _ _ _ rfl rfl a := rfl
@[simp] lemma congr_refl_left {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) {a b : α} (h : a = b) :
congr (eq.refl f) h = congr_arg f h :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma congr_refl_right {α β : Sort*} {f g : α → β} (h : f = g) (a : α) :
congr h (eq.refl a) = congr_fun h a :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma congr_arg_refl {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (a : α) :
congr_arg f (eq.refl a) = eq.refl (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma congr_fun_rfl {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (a : α) :
congr_fun (eq.refl f) a = eq.refl (f a) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma congr_fun_congr_arg {α β γ : Sort*} (f : α → β → γ) {a a' : α} (p : a = a') (b : β) :
congr_fun (congr_arg f p) b = congr_arg (λ a, f a b) p :=
rfl
lemma heq_of_cast_eq :
∀ {α β : Sort*} {a : α} {a' : β} (e : α = β) (h₂ : cast e a = a'), a == a'
| α ._ a a' rfl h := eq.rec_on h (heq.refl _)
lemma cast_eq_iff_heq {α β : Sort*} {a : α} {a' : β} {e : α = β} : cast e a = a' ↔ a == a' :=
⟨heq_of_cast_eq _, λ h, by cases h; refl⟩
lemma rec_heq_of_heq {β} {C : α → Sort*} {x : C a} {y : β} (eq : a = b) (h : x == y) :
@eq.rec α a C x b eq == y :=
by subst eq; exact h
protected lemma eq.congr {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : α} (h₁ : x₁ = y₁) (h₂ : x₂ = y₂) :
(x₁ = x₂) ↔ (y₁ = y₂) :=
by { subst h₁, subst h₂ }
lemma eq.congr_left {x y z : α} (h : x = y) : x = z ↔ y = z := by rw [h]
lemma eq.congr_right {x y z : α} (h : x = y) : z = x ↔ z = y := by rw [h]
lemma congr_arg2 {α β γ : Type*} (f : α → β → γ) {x x' : α} {y y' : β}
(hx : x = x') (hy : y = y') : f x y = f x' y' :=
by { subst hx, subst hy }
end equality
/-! ### Declarations about quantifiers -/
section quantifiers
variables {α : Sort*} {β : Sort*} {p q : α → Prop} {b : Prop}
lemma forall_imp (h : ∀ a, p a → q a) : (∀ a, p a) → ∀ a, q a :=
λ h' a, h a (h' a)
lemma forall₂_congr {p q : α → β → Prop} (h : ∀ a b, p a b ↔ q a b) :
(∀ a b, p a b) ↔ (∀ a b, q a b) :=
forall_congr (λ a, forall_congr (h a))
lemma forall₃_congr {γ : Sort*} {p q : α → β → γ → Prop}
(h : ∀ a b c, p a b c ↔ q a b c) :
(∀ a b c, p a b c) ↔ (∀ a b c, q a b c) :=
forall_congr (λ a, forall₂_congr (h a))
lemma forall₄_congr {γ δ : Sort*} {p q : α → β → γ → δ → Prop}
(h : ∀ a b c d, p a b c d ↔ q a b c d) :
(∀ a b c d, p a b c d) ↔ (∀ a b c d, q a b c d) :=
forall_congr (λ a, forall₃_congr (h a))
lemma Exists.imp (h : ∀ a, (p a → q a)) (p : ∃ a, p a) : ∃ a, q a := exists_imp_exists h p
lemma exists_imp_exists' {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (f : α → β) (hpq : ∀ a, p a → q (f a))
(hp : ∃ a, p a) : ∃ b, q b :=
exists.elim hp (λ a hp', ⟨_, hpq _ hp'⟩)
lemma exists₂_congr {p q : α → β → Prop} (h : ∀ a b, p a b ↔ q a b) :
(∃ a b, p a b) ↔ (∃ a b, q a b) :=
exists_congr (λ a, exists_congr (h a))
lemma exists₃_congr {γ : Sort*} {p q : α → β → γ → Prop}
(h : ∀ a b c, p a b c ↔ q a b c) :
(∃ a b c, p a b c) ↔ (∃ a b c, q a b c) :=
exists_congr (λ a, exists₂_congr (h a))
lemma exists₄_congr {γ δ : Sort*} {p q : α → β → γ → δ → Prop}
(h : ∀ a b c d, p a b c d ↔ q a b c d) :
(∃ a b c d, p a b c d) ↔ (∃ a b c d, q a b c d) :=
exists_congr (λ a, exists₃_congr (h a))
theorem forall_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∀ x y, p x y) ↔ ∀ y x, p x y :=
⟨swap, swap⟩
theorem exists_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∃ x y, p x y) ↔ ∃ y x, p x y :=
⟨λ ⟨x, y, h⟩, ⟨y, x, h⟩, λ ⟨y, x, h⟩, ⟨x, y, h⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem forall_exists_index {q : (∃ x, p x) → Prop} :
(∀ h, q h) ↔ ∀ x (h : p x), q ⟨x, h⟩ :=
⟨λ h x hpx, h ⟨x, hpx⟩, λ h ⟨x, hpx⟩, h x hpx⟩
theorem exists_imp_distrib : ((∃ x, p x) → b) ↔ ∀ x, p x → b :=
forall_exists_index
/--
Extract an element from a existential statement, using `classical.some`.
-/
-- This enables projection notation.
@[reducible] noncomputable def Exists.some {p : α → Prop} (P : ∃ a, p a) : α := classical.some P
/--
Show that an element extracted from `P : ∃ a, p a` using `P.some` satisfies `p`.
-/
lemma Exists.some_spec {p : α → Prop} (P : ∃ a, p a) : p (P.some) := classical.some_spec P
--theorem forall_not_of_not_exists (h : ¬ ∃ x, p x) : ∀ x, ¬ p x :=
--forall_imp_of_exists_imp h
theorem not_exists_of_forall_not (h : ∀ x, ¬ p x) : ¬ ∃ x, p x :=
exists_imp_distrib.2 h
@[simp] theorem not_exists : (¬ ∃ x, p x) ↔ ∀ x, ¬ p x :=
exists_imp_distrib
theorem not_forall_of_exists_not : (∃ x, ¬ p x) → ¬ ∀ x, p x
| ⟨x, hn⟩ h := hn (h x)
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_forall {p : α → Prop}
[decidable (∃ x, ¬ p x)] [∀ x, decidable (p x)] : (¬ ∀ x, p x) ↔ ∃ x, ¬ p x :=
⟨not.decidable_imp_symm $ λ nx x, nx.decidable_imp_symm $ λ h, ⟨x, h⟩,
not_forall_of_exists_not⟩
@[simp] theorem not_forall {p : α → Prop} : (¬ ∀ x, p x) ↔ ∃ x, ¬ p x := decidable.not_forall
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_forall_not [decidable (∃ x, p x)] :
(¬ ∀ x, ¬ p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x :=
(@decidable.not_iff_comm _ _ _ (decidable_of_iff (¬ ∃ x, p x) not_exists)).1 not_exists
theorem not_forall_not : (¬ ∀ x, ¬ p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x := decidable.not_forall_not
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_exists_not [∀ x, decidable (p x)] : (¬ ∃ x, ¬ p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
by simp [decidable.not_not]
@[simp] theorem not_exists_not : (¬ ∃ x, ¬ p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x := decidable.not_exists_not
theorem forall_imp_iff_exists_imp [ha : nonempty α] : ((∀ x, p x) → b) ↔ ∃ x, p x → b :=
let ⟨a⟩ := ha in
⟨λ h, not_forall_not.1 $ λ h', classical.by_cases (λ hb : b, h' a $ λ _, hb)
(λ hb, hb $ h $ λ x, (not_imp.1 (h' x)).1), λ ⟨x, hx⟩ h, hx (h x)⟩
-- TODO: duplicate of a lemma in core
theorem forall_true_iff : (α → true) ↔ true :=
implies_true_iff α
-- Unfortunately this causes simp to loop sometimes, so we
-- add the 2 and 3 cases as simp lemmas instead
theorem forall_true_iff' (h : ∀ a, p a ↔ true) : (∀ a, p a) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro (λ _, of_iff_true (h _))
@[simp] theorem forall_2_true_iff {β : α → Sort*} : (∀ a, β a → true) ↔ true :=
forall_true_iff' $ λ _, forall_true_iff
@[simp] theorem forall_3_true_iff {β : α → Sort*} {γ : Π a, β a → Sort*} :
(∀ a (b : β a), γ a b → true) ↔ true :=
forall_true_iff' $ λ _, forall_2_true_iff
lemma exists_unique.exists {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∃! x, p x) : ∃ x, p x :=
exists.elim h (λ x hx, ⟨x, and.left hx⟩)
@[simp] lemma exists_unique_iff_exists {α : Sort*} [subsingleton α] {p : α → Prop} :
(∃! x, p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x :=
⟨λ h, h.exists, Exists.imp $ λ x hx, ⟨hx, λ y _, subsingleton.elim y x⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem forall_const (α : Sort*) [i : nonempty α] : (α → b) ↔ b :=
⟨i.elim, λ hb x, hb⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_const (α : Sort*) [i : nonempty α] : (∃ x : α, b) ↔ b :=
⟨λ ⟨x, h⟩, h, i.elim exists.intro⟩
theorem exists_unique_const (α : Sort*) [i : nonempty α] [subsingleton α] :
(∃! x : α, b) ↔ b :=
by simp
theorem forall_and_distrib : (∀ x, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ x, p x) ∧ (∀ x, q x) :=
⟨λ h, ⟨λ x, (h x).left, λ x, (h x).right⟩, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ x, ⟨h₁ x, h₂ x⟩⟩
theorem exists_or_distrib : (∃ x, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ x, p x) ∨ (∃ x, q x) :=
⟨λ ⟨x, hpq⟩, hpq.elim (λ hpx, or.inl ⟨x, hpx⟩) (λ hqx, or.inr ⟨x, hqx⟩),
λ hepq, hepq.elim (λ ⟨x, hpx⟩, ⟨x, or.inl hpx⟩) (λ ⟨x, hqx⟩, ⟨x, or.inr hqx⟩)⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_and_distrib_left {q : Prop} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃x, q ∧ p x) ↔ q ∧ (∃x, p x) :=
⟨λ ⟨x, hq, hp⟩, ⟨hq, x, hp⟩, λ ⟨hq, x, hp⟩, ⟨x, hq, hp⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_and_distrib_right {q : Prop} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃x, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∃x, p x) ∧ q :=
by simp [and_comm]
@[simp] theorem forall_eq {a' : α} : (∀a, a = a' → p a) ↔ p a' :=
⟨λ h, h a' rfl, λ h a e, e.symm ▸ h⟩
@[simp] theorem forall_eq' {a' : α} : (∀a, a' = a → p a) ↔ p a' :=
by simp [@eq_comm _ a']
theorem and_forall_ne (a : α) : (p a ∧ ∀ b ≠ a, p b) ↔ ∀ b, p b :=
by simp only [← @forall_eq _ p a, ← forall_and_distrib, ← or_imp_distrib, classical.em,
forall_const]
-- this lemma is needed to simplify the output of `list.mem_cons_iff`
@[simp] theorem forall_eq_or_imp {a' : α} : (∀ a, a = a' ∨ q a → p a) ↔ p a' ∧ ∀ a, q a → p a :=
by simp only [or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib, forall_eq]
@[simp] theorem exists_eq {a' : α} : ∃ a, a = a' := ⟨_, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_eq' {a' : α} : ∃ a, a' = a := ⟨_, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_eq_left {a' : α} : (∃ a, a = a' ∧ p a) ↔ p a' :=
⟨λ ⟨a, e, h⟩, e ▸ h, λ h, ⟨_, rfl, h⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_eq_right {a' : α} : (∃ a, p a ∧ a = a') ↔ p a' :=
(exists_congr $ by exact λ a, and.comm).trans exists_eq_left
@[simp] theorem exists_eq_right_right {a' : α} :
(∃ (a : α), p a ∧ b ∧ a = a') ↔ p a' ∧ b :=
⟨λ ⟨_, hp, hq, rfl⟩, ⟨hp, hq⟩, λ ⟨hp, hq⟩, ⟨a', hp, hq, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_eq_right_right' {a' : α} :
(∃ (a : α), p a ∧ b ∧ a' = a) ↔ p a' ∧ b :=
⟨λ ⟨_, hp, hq, rfl⟩, ⟨hp, hq⟩, λ ⟨hp, hq⟩, ⟨a', hp, hq, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_apply_eq_apply {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) (a' : α) : ∃ a, f a = f a' :=
⟨a', rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_apply_eq_apply' {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) (a' : α) : ∃ a, f a' = f a :=
⟨a', rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_and_eq_and {f : α → β} {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} :
(∃ b, (∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b) ∧ q b) ↔ ∃ a, p a ∧ q (f a) :=
⟨λ ⟨b, ⟨a, ha, hab⟩, hb⟩, ⟨a, ha, hab.symm ▸ hb⟩, λ ⟨a, hp, hq⟩, ⟨f a, ⟨a, hp, rfl⟩, hq⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_eq_and {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ b, (∃ a, f a = b) ∧ p b) ↔ ∃ a, p (f a) :=
⟨λ ⟨b, ⟨a, ha⟩, hb⟩, ⟨a, ha.symm ▸ hb⟩, λ ⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨f a, ⟨a, rfl⟩, ha⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma exists_or_eq_left (y : α) (p : α → Prop) : ∃ (x : α), x = y ∨ p x :=
⟨y, or.inl rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma exists_or_eq_right (y : α) (p : α → Prop) : ∃ (x : α), p x ∨ x = y :=
⟨y, or.inr rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma exists_or_eq_left' (y : α) (p : α → Prop) : ∃ (x : α), y = x ∨ p x :=
⟨y, or.inl rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma exists_or_eq_right' (y : α) (p : α → Prop) : ∃ (x : α), p x ∨ y = x :=
⟨y, or.inr rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem forall_apply_eq_imp_iff {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ a, ∀ b, f a = b → p b) ↔ (∀ a, p (f a)) :=
⟨λ h a, h a (f a) rfl, λ h a b hab, hab ▸ h a⟩
@[simp] theorem forall_apply_eq_imp_iff' {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ b, ∀ a, f a = b → p b) ↔ (∀ a, p (f a)) :=
by { rw forall_swap, simp }
@[simp] theorem forall_eq_apply_imp_iff {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ a, ∀ b, b = f a → p b) ↔ (∀ a, p (f a)) :=
by simp [@eq_comm _ _ (f _)]
@[simp] theorem forall_eq_apply_imp_iff' {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ b, ∀ a, b = f a → p b) ↔ (∀ a, p (f a)) :=
by { rw forall_swap, simp }
@[simp] theorem forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂ {f : α → β} {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} :
(∀ b, ∀ a, p a → f a = b → q b) ↔ ∀ a, p a → q (f a) :=
⟨λ h a ha, h (f a) a ha rfl, λ h b a ha hb, hb ▸ h a ha⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_eq_left' {a' : α} : (∃ a, a' = a ∧ p a) ↔ p a' :=
by simp [@eq_comm _ a']
@[simp] theorem exists_eq_right' {a' : α} : (∃ a, p a ∧ a' = a) ↔ p a' :=
by simp [@eq_comm _ a']
theorem exists_comm {p : α → β → Prop} : (∃ a b, p a b) ↔ ∃ b a, p a b :=
⟨λ ⟨a, b, h⟩, ⟨b, a, h⟩, λ ⟨b, a, h⟩, ⟨a, b, h⟩⟩
theorem and.exists {p q : Prop} {f : p ∧ q → Prop} : (∃ h, f h) ↔ ∃ hp hq, f ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
⟨λ ⟨h, H⟩, ⟨h.1, h.2, H⟩, λ ⟨hp, hq, H⟩, ⟨⟨hp, hq⟩, H⟩⟩
theorem forall_or_of_or_forall (h : b ∨ ∀x, p x) (x) : b ∨ p x :=
h.imp_right $ λ h₂, h₂ x
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.forall_or_distrib_left {q : Prop} {p : α → Prop} [decidable q] :
(∀x, q ∨ p x) ↔ q ∨ (∀x, p x) :=
⟨λ h, if hq : q then or.inl hq else or.inr $ λ x, (h x).resolve_left hq,
forall_or_of_or_forall⟩
theorem forall_or_distrib_left {q : Prop} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀x, q ∨ p x) ↔ q ∨ (∀x, p x) := decidable.forall_or_distrib_left
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.forall_or_distrib_right {q : Prop} {p : α → Prop} [decidable q] :
(∀x, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀x, p x) ∨ q :=
by simp [or_comm, decidable.forall_or_distrib_left]
theorem forall_or_distrib_right {q : Prop} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀x, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀x, p x) ∨ q := decidable.forall_or_distrib_right
/-- A predicate holds everywhere on the image of a surjective functions iff
it holds everywhere. -/
theorem forall_iff_forall_surj
{α β : Type*} {f : α → β} (h : function.surjective f) {P : β → Prop} :
(∀ a, P (f a)) ↔ ∀ b, P b :=
⟨λ ha b, by cases h b with a hab; rw ←hab; exact ha a, λ hb a, hb $ f a⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_prop {p q : Prop} : (∃ h : p, q) ↔ p ∧ q :=
⟨λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩
theorem exists_unique_prop {p q : Prop} : (∃! h : p, q) ↔ p ∧ q :=
by simp
@[simp] theorem exists_false : ¬ (∃a:α, false) := assume ⟨a, h⟩, h
@[simp] lemma exists_unique_false : ¬ (∃! (a : α), false) := assume ⟨a, h, h'⟩, h
theorem Exists.fst {p : b → Prop} : Exists p → b
| ⟨h, _⟩ := h
theorem Exists.snd {p : b → Prop} : ∀ h : Exists p, p h.fst
| ⟨_, h⟩ := h
theorem forall_prop_of_true {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} (h : p) : (∀ h' : p, q h') ↔ q h :=
@forall_const (q h) p ⟨h⟩
theorem exists_prop_of_true {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} (h : p) : (∃ h' : p, q h') ↔ q h :=
@exists_const (q h) p ⟨h⟩
theorem exists_unique_prop_of_true {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} (h : p) : (∃! h' : p, q h') ↔ q h :=
@exists_unique_const (q h) p ⟨h⟩ _
theorem forall_prop_of_false {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} (hn : ¬ p) :
(∀ h' : p, q h') ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro $ λ h, hn.elim h
theorem exists_prop_of_false {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} : ¬ p → ¬ (∃ h' : p, q h') :=
mt Exists.fst
@[congr] lemma exists_prop_congr {p p' : Prop} {q q' : p → Prop}
(hq : ∀ h, q h ↔ q' h) (hp : p ↔ p') : Exists q ↔ ∃ h : p', q' (hp.2 h) :=
⟨λ ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨hp.1 ‹_›, (hq _).1 ‹_›⟩, λ ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, (hq _).2 ‹_›⟩⟩
@[congr] lemma exists_prop_congr' {p p' : Prop} {q q' : p → Prop}
(hq : ∀ h, q h ↔ q' h) (hp : p ↔ p') : Exists q = ∃ h : p', q' (hp.2 h) :=
propext (exists_prop_congr hq _)
@[simp] lemma exists_true_left (p : true → Prop) : (∃ x, p x) ↔ p true.intro :=
exists_prop_of_true _
@[simp] lemma exists_false_left (p : false → Prop) : ¬ ∃ x, p x :=
exists_prop_of_false not_false
lemma exists_unique.unique {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∃! x, p x)
{y₁ y₂ : α} (py₁ : p y₁) (py₂ : p y₂) : y₁ = y₂ :=
unique_of_exists_unique h py₁ py₂
@[congr] lemma forall_prop_congr {p p' : Prop} {q q' : p → Prop}
(hq : ∀ h, q h ↔ q' h) (hp : p ↔ p') : (∀ h, q h) ↔ ∀ h : p', q' (hp.2 h) :=
⟨λ h1 h2, (hq _).1 (h1 (hp.2 _)), λ h1 h2, (hq _).2 (h1 (hp.1 h2))⟩
@[congr] lemma forall_prop_congr' {p p' : Prop} {q q' : p → Prop}
(hq : ∀ h, q h ↔ q' h) (hp : p ↔ p') : (∀ h, q h) = ∀ h : p', q' (hp.2 h) :=
propext (forall_prop_congr hq _)
@[simp] lemma forall_true_left (p : true → Prop) : (∀ x, p x) ↔ p true.intro :=
forall_prop_of_true _
@[simp] lemma forall_false_left (p : false → Prop) : (∀ x, p x) ↔ true :=
forall_prop_of_false not_false
lemma exists_unique.elim2 {α : Sort*} {p : α → Sort*} [∀ x, subsingleton (p x)]
{q : Π x (h : p x), Prop} {b : Prop} (h₂ : ∃! x (h : p x), q x h)
(h₁ : ∀ x (h : p x), q x h → (∀ y (hy : p y), q y hy → y = x) → b) : b :=
begin
simp only [exists_unique_iff_exists] at h₂,
apply h₂.elim,
exact λ x ⟨hxp, hxq⟩ H, h₁ x hxp hxq (λ y hyp hyq, H y ⟨hyp, hyq⟩)
end
lemma exists_unique.intro2 {α : Sort*} {p : α → Sort*} [∀ x, subsingleton (p x)]
{q : Π (x : α) (h : p x), Prop} (w : α) (hp : p w) (hq : q w hp)
(H : ∀ y (hy : p y), q y hy → y = w) :
∃! x (hx : p x), q x hx :=
begin
simp only [exists_unique_iff_exists],
exact exists_unique.intro w ⟨hp, hq⟩ (λ y ⟨hyp, hyq⟩, H y hyp hyq)
end
lemma exists_unique.exists2 {α : Sort*} {p : α → Sort*} {q : Π (x : α) (h : p x), Prop}
(h : ∃! x (hx : p x), q x hx) :
∃ x (hx : p x), q x hx :=
h.exists.imp (λ x hx, hx.exists)
lemma exists_unique.unique2 {α : Sort*} {p : α → Sort*} [∀ x, subsingleton (p x)]
{q : Π (x : α) (hx : p x), Prop} (h : ∃! x (hx : p x), q x hx)
{y₁ y₂ : α} (hpy₁ : p y₁) (hqy₁ : q y₁ hpy₁)
(hpy₂ : p y₂) (hqy₂ : q y₂ hpy₂) : y₁ = y₂ :=
begin
simp only [exists_unique_iff_exists] at h,
exact h.unique ⟨hpy₁, hqy₁⟩ ⟨hpy₂, hqy₂⟩
end
end quantifiers
/-! ### Classical lemmas -/
namespace classical
variables {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop}
theorem cases {p : Prop → Prop} (h1 : p true) (h2 : p false) : ∀a, p a :=
assume a, cases_on a h1 h2
/- use shortened names to avoid conflict when classical namespace is open. -/
noncomputable lemma dec (p : Prop) : decidable p := -- see Note [classical lemma]
by apply_instance
noncomputable lemma dec_pred (p : α → Prop) : decidable_pred p := -- see Note [classical lemma]
by apply_instance
noncomputable lemma dec_rel (p : α → α → Prop) : decidable_rel p := -- see Note [classical lemma]
by apply_instance
noncomputable lemma dec_eq (α : Sort*) : decidable_eq α := -- see Note [classical lemma]
by apply_instance
/--
We make decidability results that depends on `classical.choice` noncomputable lemmas.
* We have to mark them as noncomputable, because otherwise Lean will try to generate bytecode
for them, and fail because it depends on `classical.choice`.
* We make them lemmas, and not definitions, because otherwise later definitions will raise
\"failed to generate bytecode\" errors when writing something like
`letI := classical.dec_eq _`.
Cf. <https://leanprover-community.github.io/archive/stream/113488-general/topic/noncomputable.20theorem.html>
-/
library_note "classical lemma"
/-- Construct a function from a default value `H0`, and a function to use if there exists a value
satisfying the predicate. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
noncomputable def {u} exists_cases {C : Sort u} (H0 : C) (H : ∀ a, p a → C) : C :=
if h : ∃ a, p a then H (classical.some h) (classical.some_spec h) else H0
lemma some_spec2 {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} {h : ∃a, p a}
(q : α → Prop) (hpq : ∀a, p a → q a) : q (some h) :=
hpq _ $ some_spec _
/-- A version of classical.indefinite_description which is definitionally equal to a pair -/
noncomputable def subtype_of_exists {α : Type*} {P : α → Prop} (h : ∃ x, P x) : {x // P x} :=
⟨classical.some h, classical.some_spec h⟩
/-- A version of `by_contradiction` that uses types instead of propositions. -/
protected noncomputable def by_contradiction' {α : Sort*} (H : ¬ (α → false)) : α :=
classical.choice $ peirce _ false $ λ h, (H $ λ a, h ⟨a⟩).elim
/-- `classical.by_contradiction'` is equivalent to lean's axiom `classical.choice`. -/
def choice_of_by_contradiction' {α : Sort*} (contra : ¬ (α → false) → α) : nonempty α → α :=
λ H, contra H.elim
end classical
/-- This function has the same type as `exists.rec_on`, and can be used to case on an equality,
but `exists.rec_on` can only eliminate into Prop, while this version eliminates into any universe
using the axiom of choice. -/
@[elab_as_eliminator]
noncomputable def {u} exists.classical_rec_on
{α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∃ a, p a) {C : Sort u} (H : ∀ a, p a → C) : C :=
H (classical.some h) (classical.some_spec h)
/-! ### Declarations about bounded quantifiers -/
section bounded_quantifiers
variables {α : Sort*} {r p q : α → Prop} {P Q : ∀ x, p x → Prop} {b : Prop}
theorem bex_def : (∃ x (h : p x), q x) ↔ ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨λ ⟨x, px, qx⟩, ⟨x, px, qx⟩, λ ⟨x, px, qx⟩, ⟨x, px, qx⟩⟩
theorem bex.elim {b : Prop} : (∃ x h, P x h) → (∀ a h, P a h → b) → b
| ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩ h' := h' a h₁ h₂
theorem bex.intro (a : α) (h₁ : p a) (h₂ : P a h₁) : ∃ x (h : p x), P x h :=
⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
theorem ball_congr (H : ∀ x h, P x h ↔ Q x h) :
(∀ x h, P x h) ↔ (∀ x h, Q x h) :=
forall_congr $ λ x, forall_congr (H x)
theorem bex_congr (H : ∀ x h, P x h ↔ Q x h) :
(∃ x h, P x h) ↔ (∃ x h, Q x h) :=
exists_congr $ λ x, exists_congr (H x)
theorem bex_eq_left {a : α} : (∃ x (_ : x = a), p x) ↔ p a :=
by simp only [exists_prop, exists_eq_left]
theorem ball.imp_right (H : ∀ x h, (P x h → Q x h))
(h₁ : ∀ x h, P x h) (x h) : Q x h :=
H _ _ $ h₁ _ _
theorem bex.imp_right (H : ∀ x h, (P x h → Q x h)) :
(∃ x h, P x h) → ∃ x h, Q x h
| ⟨x, h, h'⟩ := ⟨_, _, H _ _ h'⟩
theorem ball.imp_left (H : ∀ x, p x → q x)
(h₁ : ∀ x, q x → r x) (x) (h : p x) : r x :=
h₁ _ $ H _ h
theorem bex.imp_left (H : ∀ x, p x → q x) :
(∃ x (_ : p x), r x) → ∃ x (_ : q x), r x
| ⟨x, hp, hr⟩ := ⟨x, H _ hp, hr⟩
theorem ball_of_forall (h : ∀ x, p x) (x) : p x :=
h x
theorem forall_of_ball (H : ∀ x, p x) (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) (x) : q x :=
h x $ H x
theorem bex_of_exists (H : ∀ x, p x) : (∃ x, q x) → ∃ x (_ : p x), q x
| ⟨x, hq⟩ := ⟨x, H x, hq⟩
theorem exists_of_bex : (∃ x (_ : p x), q x) → ∃ x, q x
| ⟨x, _, hq⟩ := ⟨x, hq⟩
@[simp] theorem bex_imp_distrib : ((∃ x h, P x h) → b) ↔ (∀ x h, P x h → b) :=
by simp
theorem not_bex : (¬ ∃ x h, P x h) ↔ ∀ x h, ¬ P x h :=
bex_imp_distrib
theorem not_ball_of_bex_not : (∃ x h, ¬ P x h) → ¬ ∀ x h, P x h
| ⟨x, h, hp⟩ al := hp $ al x h
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem decidable.not_ball [decidable (∃ x h, ¬ P x h)] [∀ x h, decidable (P x h)] :
(¬ ∀ x h, P x h) ↔ (∃ x h, ¬ P x h) :=
⟨not.decidable_imp_symm $ λ nx x h, nx.decidable_imp_symm $ λ h', ⟨x, h, h'⟩,
not_ball_of_bex_not⟩
theorem not_ball : (¬ ∀ x h, P x h) ↔ (∃ x h, ¬ P x h) := decidable.not_ball
theorem ball_true_iff (p : α → Prop) : (∀ x, p x → true) ↔ true :=
iff_true_intro (λ h hrx, trivial)
theorem ball_and_distrib : (∀ x h, P x h ∧ Q x h) ↔ (∀ x h, P x h) ∧ (∀ x h, Q x h) :=
iff.trans (forall_congr $ λ x, forall_and_distrib) forall_and_distrib
theorem bex_or_distrib : (∃ x h, P x h ∨ Q x h) ↔ (∃ x h, P x h) ∨ (∃ x h, Q x h) :=
iff.trans (exists_congr $ λ x, exists_or_distrib) exists_or_distrib
theorem ball_or_left_distrib : (∀ x, p x ∨ q x → r x) ↔ (∀ x, p x → r x) ∧ (∀ x, q x → r x) :=
iff.trans (forall_congr $ λ x, or_imp_distrib) forall_and_distrib
theorem bex_or_left_distrib :
(∃ x (_ : p x ∨ q x), r x) ↔ (∃ x (_ : p x), r x) ∨ (∃ x (_ : q x), r x) :=
by simp only [exists_prop]; exact
iff.trans (exists_congr $ λ x, or_and_distrib_right) exists_or_distrib
end bounded_quantifiers
namespace classical
local attribute [instance] prop_decidable
theorem not_ball {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} {P : Π (x : α), p x → Prop} :
(¬ ∀ x h, P x h) ↔ (∃ x h, ¬ P x h) := _root_.not_ball
end classical
lemma ite_eq_iff {α} {p : Prop} [decidable p] {a b c : α} :
(if p then a else b) = c ↔ p ∧ a = c ∨ ¬p ∧ b = c :=
by by_cases p; simp *
@[simp] lemma ite_eq_left_iff {α} {p : Prop} [decidable p] {a b : α} :
(if p then a else b) = a ↔ (¬p → b = a) :=
by by_cases p; simp *
@[simp] lemma ite_eq_right_iff {α} {p : Prop} [decidable p] {a b : α} :
(if p then a else b) = b ↔ (p → a = b) :=
by by_cases p; simp *
lemma ite_eq_or_eq {α} {p : Prop} [decidable p] (a b : α) :
ite p a b = a ∨ ite p a b = b :=
decidable.by_cases (λ h, or.inl (if_pos h)) (λ h, or.inr (if_neg h))
/-! ### Declarations about `nonempty` -/
section nonempty
universe variables u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : α → Type w}
attribute [simp] nonempty_of_inhabited
@[priority 20]
instance has_zero.nonempty [has_zero α] : nonempty α := ⟨0⟩
@[priority 20]
instance has_one.nonempty [has_one α] : nonempty α := ⟨1⟩
lemma exists_true_iff_nonempty {α : Sort*} : (∃a:α, true) ↔ nonempty α :=
iff.intro (λ⟨a, _⟩, ⟨a⟩) (λ⟨a⟩, ⟨a, trivial⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_Prop {p : Prop} : nonempty p ↔ p :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨h⟩, h) (assume h, ⟨h⟩)
lemma not_nonempty_iff_imp_false {α : Sort*} : ¬ nonempty α ↔ α → false :=
⟨λ h a, h ⟨a⟩, λ h ⟨a⟩, h a⟩
@[simp] lemma nonempty_sigma : nonempty (Σa:α, γ a) ↔ (∃a:α, nonempty (γ a)) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a, c⟩⟩, ⟨a, ⟨c⟩⟩) (assume ⟨a, ⟨c⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a, c⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_subtype {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} : nonempty (subtype p) ↔ (∃a:α, p a) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩, ⟨a, h⟩) (assume ⟨a, h⟩, ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_prod : nonempty (α × β) ↔ (nonempty α ∧ nonempty β) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a, b⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩⟩) (assume ⟨⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a, b⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_pprod {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} :
nonempty (pprod α β) ↔ (nonempty α ∧ nonempty β) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a, b⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩⟩) (assume ⟨⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a, b⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_sum : nonempty (α ⊕ β) ↔ (nonempty α ∨ nonempty β) :=
iff.intro
(assume ⟨h⟩, match h with sum.inl a := or.inl ⟨a⟩ | sum.inr b := or.inr ⟨b⟩ end)
(assume h, match h with or.inl ⟨a⟩ := ⟨sum.inl a⟩ | or.inr ⟨b⟩ := ⟨sum.inr b⟩ end)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_psum {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} :
nonempty (psum α β) ↔ (nonempty α ∨ nonempty β) :=
iff.intro
(assume ⟨h⟩, match h with psum.inl a := or.inl ⟨a⟩ | psum.inr b := or.inr ⟨b⟩ end)
(assume h, match h with or.inl ⟨a⟩ := ⟨psum.inl a⟩ | or.inr ⟨b⟩ := ⟨psum.inr b⟩ end)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_psigma {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} :
nonempty (psigma β) ↔ (∃a:α, nonempty (β a)) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a, c⟩⟩, ⟨a, ⟨c⟩⟩) (assume ⟨a, ⟨c⟩⟩, ⟨⟨a, c⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_empty : ¬ nonempty empty :=
assume ⟨h⟩, h.elim
@[simp] lemma nonempty_ulift : nonempty (ulift α) ↔ nonempty α :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a⟩⟩, ⟨a⟩) (assume ⟨a⟩, ⟨⟨a⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty_plift {α : Sort u} : nonempty (plift α) ↔ nonempty α :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a⟩⟩, ⟨a⟩) (assume ⟨a⟩, ⟨⟨a⟩⟩)
@[simp] lemma nonempty.forall {α : Sort u} {p : nonempty α → Prop} :
(∀h:nonempty α, p h) ↔ (∀a, p ⟨a⟩) :=
iff.intro (assume h a, h _) (assume h ⟨a⟩, h _)
@[simp] lemma nonempty.exists {α : Sort u} {p : nonempty α → Prop} :
(∃h:nonempty α, p h) ↔ (∃a, p ⟨a⟩) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨⟨a⟩, h⟩, ⟨a, h⟩) (assume ⟨a, h⟩, ⟨⟨a⟩, h⟩)
lemma classical.nonempty_pi {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} :
nonempty (Πa:α, β a) ↔ (∀a:α, nonempty (β a)) :=
iff.intro (assume ⟨f⟩ a, ⟨f a⟩) (assume f, ⟨assume a, classical.choice $ f a⟩)
/-- Using `classical.choice`, lifts a (`Prop`-valued) `nonempty` instance to a (`Type`-valued)
`inhabited` instance. `classical.inhabited_of_nonempty` already exists, in
`core/init/classical.lean`, but the assumption is not a type class argument,
which makes it unsuitable for some applications. -/
noncomputable def classical.inhabited_of_nonempty' {α : Sort u} [h : nonempty α] : inhabited α :=
⟨classical.choice h⟩
/-- Using `classical.choice`, extracts a term from a `nonempty` type. -/
@[reducible] protected noncomputable def nonempty.some {α : Sort u} (h : nonempty α) : α :=
classical.choice h
/-- Using `classical.choice`, extracts a term from a `nonempty` type. -/
@[reducible] protected noncomputable def classical.arbitrary (α : Sort u) [h : nonempty α] : α :=
classical.choice h
/-- Given `f : α → β`, if `α` is nonempty then `β` is also nonempty.
`nonempty` cannot be a `functor`, because `functor` is restricted to `Type`. -/
lemma nonempty.map {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} (f : α → β) : nonempty α → nonempty β
| ⟨h⟩ := ⟨f h⟩
protected lemma nonempty.map2 {α β γ : Sort*} (f : α → β → γ) : nonempty α → nonempty β → nonempty γ
| ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩ := ⟨f x y⟩
protected lemma nonempty.congr {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} (f : α → β) (g : β → α) :
nonempty α ↔ nonempty β :=
⟨nonempty.map f, nonempty.map g⟩
lemma nonempty.elim_to_inhabited {α : Sort*} [h : nonempty α] {p : Prop}
(f : inhabited α → p) : p :=
h.elim $ f ∘ inhabited.mk
instance {α β} [h : nonempty α] [h2 : nonempty β] : nonempty (α × β) :=
h.elim $ λ g, h2.elim $ λ g2, ⟨⟨g, g2⟩⟩
end nonempty
lemma subsingleton_of_not_nonempty {α : Sort*} (h : ¬ nonempty α) : subsingleton α :=
⟨λ x, false.elim $ not_nonempty_iff_imp_false.mp h x⟩
section ite
/-- A `dite` whose results do not actually depend on the condition may be reduced to an `ite`. -/
@[simp]
lemma dite_eq_ite (P : Prop) [decidable P] {α : Sort*} (x y : α) :
dite P (λ h, x) (λ h, y) = ite P x y := rfl
/-- A function applied to a `dite` is a `dite` of that function applied to each of the branches. -/
lemma apply_dite {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (P : Prop) [decidable P] (x : P → α) (y : ¬P → α) :
f (dite P x y) = dite P (λ h, f (x h)) (λ h, f (y h)) :=
by { by_cases h : P; simp [h] }
/-- A function applied to a `ite` is a `ite` of that function applied to each of the branches. -/
lemma apply_ite {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (P : Prop) [decidable P] (x y : α) :
f (ite P x y) = ite P (f x) (f y) :=
apply_dite f P (λ _, x) (λ _, y)
/-- A two-argument function applied to two `dite`s is a `dite` of that two-argument function
applied to each of the branches. -/
lemma apply_dite2 {α β γ : Sort*} (f : α → β → γ) (P : Prop) [decidable P] (a : P → α)
(b : ¬P → α) (c : P → β) (d : ¬P → β) :
f (dite P a b) (dite P c d) = dite P (λ h, f (a h) (c h)) (λ h, f (b h) (d h)) :=
by { by_cases h : P; simp [h] }
/-- A two-argument function applied to two `ite`s is a `ite` of that two-argument function
applied to each of the branches. -/
lemma apply_ite2 {α β γ : Sort*} (f : α → β → γ) (P : Prop) [decidable P] (a b : α) (c d : β) :
f (ite P a b) (ite P c d) = ite P (f a c) (f b d) :=
apply_dite2 f P (λ _, a) (λ _, b) (λ _, c) (λ _, d)
/-- A 'dite' producing a `Pi` type `Π a, β a`, applied to a value `x : α`
is a `dite` that applies either branch to `x`. -/
lemma dite_apply {α : Sort*} {β : α → Sort*} (P : Prop) [decidable P]
(f : P → Π a, β a) (g : ¬ P → Π a, β a) (x : α) :
(dite P f g) x = dite P (λ h, f h x) (λ h, g h x) :=
by { by_cases h : P; simp [h] }
/-- A 'ite' producing a `Pi` type `Π a, β a`, applied to a value `x : α`
is a `ite` that applies either branch to `x` -/
lemma ite_apply {α : Sort*} {β : α → Sort*} (P : Prop) [decidable P]
(f g : Π a, β a) (x : α) :
(ite P f g) x = ite P (f x) (g x) :=
dite_apply P (λ _, f) (λ _, g) x
/-- Negation of the condition `P : Prop` in a `dite` is the same as swapping the branches. -/
@[simp] lemma dite_not {α : Sort*} (P : Prop) [decidable P] (x : ¬ P → α) (y : ¬¬ P → α) :
dite (¬ P) x y = dite P (λ h, y (not_not_intro h)) x :=
by { by_cases h : P; simp [h] }
/-- Negation of the condition `P : Prop` in a `ite` is the same as swapping the branches. -/
@[simp] lemma ite_not {α : Sort*} (P : Prop) [decidable P] (x y : α) :
ite (¬ P) x y = ite P y x :=
dite_not P (λ _, x) (λ _, y)
lemma ite_and {α} {p q : Prop} [decidable p] [decidable q] {x y : α} :
ite (p ∧ q) x y = ite p (ite q x y) y :=
by { by_cases hp : p; by_cases hq : q; simp [hp, hq] }
end ite
|
19023fbd34e6aa8bf42a42a5ac7684c4fdbc052b | a9d0fb7b0e4f802bd3857b803e6c5c23d87fef91 | /library/data/empty.lean | 29e4b2e07e9cfdfbf849654f2b256944efa23689 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soonhokong/lean-osx | 4a954262c780e404c1369d6c06516161d07fcb40 | 3670278342d2f4faa49d95b46d86642d7875b47c | refs/heads/master | 1,611,410,334,552 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 1,474,425,686,000 | 12,043,103 | 5 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,377 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Jeremy Avigad, Floris van Doorn
-/
import logic.cast
namespace empty
protected definition elim (A : Type) : empty → A :=
empty.rec (λe, A)
attribute [instance]
protected definition subsingleton : subsingleton empty :=
subsingleton.intro (λ a b, empty.elim _ a)
end empty
attribute [instance]
protected definition empty.has_decidable_eq : decidable_eq empty :=
take (a b : empty), decidable.tt (empty.elim _ a)
definition tneg.tneg (A : Type) := A → empty
prefix `~` := tneg.tneg
namespace tneg
variables {A B : Type}
protected definition intro (H : A → empty) : ~A := H
protected definition elim (H1 : ~A) (H2 : A) : empty := H1 H2
protected definition empty : ~empty := λH : empty, H
definition tabsurd (H1 : A) (H2 : ~A) : B := empty.elim _ (H2 H1)
definition tneg_tneg_intro (H : A) : ~~A := λH2 : ~A, tneg.elim H2 H
definition tmt (H1 : A → B) (H2 : ~B) : ~A := λHA : A, tabsurd (H1 HA) H2
definition tneg_pi_left {B : A → Type} (H : ~Πa, B a) : ~~A :=
λHnA : ~A, tneg.elim H (λHA : A, tabsurd HA HnA)
definition tneg_function_right (H : ~(A → B)) : ~B :=
λHB : B, tneg.elim H (λHA : A, HB)
end tneg
|
4d63458354ea3619e74a8d3cbbf8520e5b0bc30d | 4b846d8dabdc64e7ea03552bad8f7fa74763fc67 | /library/init/cc_lemmas.lean | 56f3ca3edfaee03a2f33369c1f86531c28e3eff8 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | pacchiano/lean | 9324b33f3ac3b5c5647285160f9f6ea8d0d767dc | fdadada3a970377a6df8afcd629a6f2eab6e84e8 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,357,380,399 | 1,489,870,101,000 | 1,489,870,101,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,675 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.propext init.classical
/- Lemmas use by the congruence closure module -/
lemma iff_eq_of_eq_true_left {a b : Prop} (h : a = true) : (a ↔ b) = b :=
h^.symm ▸ propext (true_iff _)
lemma iff_eq_of_eq_true_right {a b : Prop} (h : b = true) : (a ↔ b) = a :=
h^.symm ▸ propext (iff_true _)
lemma iff_eq_true_of_eq {a b : Prop} (h : a = b) : (a ↔ b) = true :=
h ▸ propext (iff_self _)
lemma and_eq_of_eq_true_left {a b : Prop} (h : a = true) : (a ∧ b) = b :=
h^.symm ▸ propext (true_and _)
lemma and_eq_of_eq_true_right {a b : Prop} (h : b = true) : (a ∧ b) = a :=
h^.symm ▸ propext (and_true _)
lemma and_eq_of_eq_false_left {a b : Prop} (h : a = false) : (a ∧ b) = false :=
h^.symm ▸ propext (false_and _)
lemma and_eq_of_eq_false_right {a b : Prop} (h : b = false) : (a ∧ b) = false :=
h^.symm ▸ propext (and_false _)
lemma and_eq_of_eq {a b : Prop} (h : a = b) : (a ∧ b) = a :=
h ▸ propext (and_self _)
lemma or_eq_of_eq_true_left {a b : Prop} (h : a = true) : (a ∨ b) = true :=
h^.symm ▸ propext (true_or _)
lemma or_eq_of_eq_true_right {a b : Prop} (h : b = true) : (a ∨ b) = true :=
h^.symm ▸ propext (or_true _)
lemma or_eq_of_eq_false_left {a b : Prop} (h : a = false) : (a ∨ b) = b :=
h^.symm ▸ propext (false_or _)
lemma or_eq_of_eq_false_right {a b : Prop} (h : b = false) : (a ∨ b) = a :=
h^.symm ▸ propext (or_false _)
lemma or_eq_of_eq {a b : Prop} (h : a = b) : (a ∨ b) = a :=
h ▸ propext (or_self _)
lemma imp_eq_of_eq_true_left {a b : Prop} (h : a = true) : (a → b) = b :=
h^.symm ▸ propext (iff.intro (λ h, h trivial) (λ h₁ h₂, h₁))
lemma imp_eq_of_eq_true_right {a b : Prop} (h : b = true) : (a → b) = true :=
h^.symm ▸ propext (iff.intro (λ h, trivial) (λ h₁ h₂, h₁))
lemma imp_eq_of_eq_false_left {a b : Prop} (h : a = false) : (a → b) = true :=
h^.symm ▸ propext (iff.intro (λ h, trivial) (λ h₁ h₂, false.elim h₂))
lemma imp_eq_of_eq_false_right {a b : Prop} (h : b = false) : (a → b) = not a :=
h^.symm ▸ propext (iff.intro (λ h, h) (λ hna ha, hna ha))
/- Remark: the congruence closure module will only use the following lemma is
cc_config.em is tt. -/
lemma not_imp_eq_of_eq_false_right {a b : Prop} (h : b = false) : (not a → b) = a :=
h^.symm ▸ propext (iff.intro (λ h', classical.by_contradiction (λ hna, h' hna)) (λ ha hna, hna ha))
lemma imp_eq_true_of_eq {a b : Prop} (h : a = b) : (a → b) = true :=
h ▸ propext (iff.intro (λ h, trivial) (λ h ha, ha))
lemma not_eq_of_eq_true {a : Prop} (h : a = true) : (not a) = false :=
h^.symm ▸ propext not_true_iff
lemma not_eq_of_eq_false {a : Prop} (h : a = false) : (not a) = true :=
h^.symm ▸ propext not_false_iff
lemma false_of_a_eq_not_a {a : Prop} (h : a = not a) : false :=
have not a, from λ ha, absurd ha (eq.mp h ha),
absurd (eq.mpr h this) this
universes u
lemma if_eq_of_eq_true {c : Prop} [d : decidable c] {α : Sort u} (t e : α) (h : c = true) : (@ite c d α t e) = t :=
if_pos (of_eq_true h)
lemma if_eq_of_eq_false {c : Prop} [d : decidable c] {α : Sort u} (t e : α) (h : c = false) : (@ite c d α t e) = e :=
if_neg (not_of_eq_false h)
lemma if_eq_of_eq (c : Prop) [d : decidable c] {α : Sort u} {t e : α} (h : t = e) : (@ite c d α t e) = t :=
match d with
| (is_true hc) := rfl
| (is_false hnc) := eq.symm h
end
lemma eq_true_of_and_eq_true_left {a b : Prop} (h : (a ∧ b) = true) : a = true :=
eq_true_intro (and.left (of_eq_true h))
lemma eq_true_of_and_eq_true_right {a b : Prop} (h : (a ∧ b) = true) : b = true :=
eq_true_intro (and.right (of_eq_true h))
lemma eq_false_of_or_eq_false_left {a b : Prop} (h : (a ∨ b) = false) : a = false :=
eq_false_intro (λ ha, false.elim (eq.mp h (or.inl ha)))
lemma eq_false_of_or_eq_false_right {a b : Prop} (h : (a ∨ b) = false) : b = false :=
eq_false_intro (λ hb, false.elim (eq.mp h (or.inr hb)))
lemma eq_false_of_not_eq_true {a : Prop} (h : (not a) = true) : a = false :=
eq_false_intro (λ ha, absurd ha (eq.mpr h trivial))
/- Remark: the congruence closure module will only use the following lemma is
cc_config.em is tt. -/
lemma eq_true_of_not_eq_false {a : Prop} (h : (not a) = false) : a = true :=
eq_true_intro (classical.by_contradiction (λ hna, eq.mp h hna))
lemma ne_of_eq_of_ne {α : Sort u} {a b c : α} (h₁ : a = b) (h₂ : b ≠ c) : a ≠ c :=
h₁^.symm ▸ h₂
lemma ne_of_ne_of_eq {α : Sort u} {a b c : α} (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : b = c) : a ≠ c :=
h₂ ▸ h₁
|
9ccb5152ee016ecfbdcc38021fab065d6eed53cd | aa5a655c05e5359a70646b7154e7cac59f0b4132 | /src/Lean/Elab/Term.lean | cc414fa61f019ec74d1f4c93ef696555bcc86229 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | lambdaxymox/lean4 | ae943c960a42247e06eff25c35338268d07454cb | 278d47c77270664ef29715faab467feac8a0f446 | refs/heads/master | 1,677,891,867,340 | 1,612,500,005,000 | 1,612,500,005,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 62,899 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.ResolveName
import Lean.Util.Sorry
import Lean.Structure
import Lean.Meta.ExprDefEq
import Lean.Meta.AppBuilder
import Lean.Meta.SynthInstance
import Lean.Meta.CollectMVars
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Util
import Lean.Hygiene
import Lean.Util.RecDepth
import Lean.Elab.Log
import Lean.Elab.Level
import Lean.Elab.Attributes
import Lean.Elab.AutoBound
import Lean.Elab.InfoTree
namespace Lean.Elab.Term
/-
Set isDefEq configuration for the elaborator.
Note that we enable all approximations but `quasiPatternApprox`
In Lean3 and Lean 4, we used to use the quasi-pattern approximation during elaboration.
The example:
```
def ex : StateT δ (StateT σ Id) σ :=
monadLift (get : StateT σ Id σ)
```
demonstrates why it produces counterintuitive behavior.
We have the `Monad-lift` application:
```
@monadLift ?m ?n ?c ?α (get : StateT σ id σ) : ?n ?α
```
It produces the following unification problem when we process the expected type:
```
?n ?α =?= StateT δ (StateT σ id) σ
==> (approximate using first-order unification)
?n := StateT δ (StateT σ id)
?α := σ
```
Then, we need to solve:
```
?m ?α =?= StateT σ id σ
==> instantiate metavars
?m σ =?= StateT σ id σ
==> (approximate since it is a quasi-pattern unification constraint)
?m := fun σ => StateT σ id σ
```
Note that the constraint is not a Milner pattern because σ is in
the local context of `?m`. We are ignoring the other possible solutions:
```
?m := fun σ' => StateT σ id σ
?m := fun σ' => StateT σ' id σ
?m := fun σ' => StateT σ id σ'
```
We need the quasi-pattern approximation for elaborating recursor-like expressions (e.g., dependent `match with` expressions).
If we had use first-order unification, then we would have produced
the right answer: `?m := StateT σ id`
Haskell would work on this example since it always uses
first-order unification.
-/
def setElabConfig (cfg : Meta.Config) : Meta.Config :=
{ cfg with foApprox := true, ctxApprox := true, constApprox := false, quasiPatternApprox := false }
structure Context where
fileName : String
fileMap : FileMap
declName? : Option Name := none
macroStack : MacroStack := []
currMacroScope : MacroScope := firstFrontendMacroScope
/- When `mayPostpone == true`, an elaboration function may interrupt its execution by throwing `Exception.postpone`.
The function `elabTerm` catches this exception and creates fresh synthetic metavariable `?m`, stores `?m` in
the list of pending synthetic metavariables, and returns `?m`. -/
mayPostpone : Bool := true
/- When `errToSorry` is set to true, the method `elabTerm` catches
exceptions and converts them into synthetic `sorry`s.
The implementation of choice nodes and overloaded symbols rely on the fact
that when `errToSorry` is set to false for an elaboration function `F`, then
`errToSorry` remains `false` for all elaboration functions invoked by `F`.
That is, it is safe to transition `errToSorry` from `true` to `false`, but
we must not set `errToSorry` to `true` when it is currently set to `false`. -/
errToSorry : Bool := true
/- When `autoBoundImplicit` is set to true, instead of producing
an "unknown identifier" error for unbound variables, we generate an
internal exception. This exception is caught at `elabBinders` and
`elabTypeWithUnboldImplicit`. Both methods add implicit declarations
for the unbound variable and try again. -/
autoBoundImplicit : Bool := false
autoBoundImplicits : Std.PArray Expr := {}
/-- Map from user name to internal unique name -/
sectionVars : NameMap Name := {}
/-- Map from internal name to fvar -/
sectionFVars : NameMap Expr := {}
/-- We use synthetic metavariables as placeholders for pending elaboration steps. -/
inductive SyntheticMVarKind where
-- typeclass instance search
| typeClass
/- Similar to typeClass, but error messages are different.
if `f?` is `some f`, we produce an application type mismatch error message.
Otherwise, if `header?` is `some header`, we generate the error `(header ++ "has type" ++ eType ++ "but it is expected to have type" ++ expectedType)`
Otherwise, we generate the error `("type mismatch" ++ e ++ "has type" ++ eType ++ "but it is expected to have type" ++ expectedType)` -/
| coe (header? : Option String) (expectedType : Expr) (eType : Expr) (e : Expr) (f? : Option Expr)
-- tactic block execution
| tactic (declName? : Option Name) (tacticCode : Syntax)
-- `elabTerm` call that threw `Exception.postpone` (input is stored at `SyntheticMVarDecl.ref`)
| postponed (macroStack : MacroStack) (declName? : Option Name)
structure SyntheticMVarDecl where
mvarId : MVarId
stx : Syntax
kind : SyntheticMVarKind
inductive MVarErrorKind where
| implicitArg (ctx : Expr)
| hole
| custom (msgData : MessageData)
structure MVarErrorInfo where
mvarId : MVarId
ref : Syntax
kind : MVarErrorKind
structure LetRecToLift where
ref : Syntax
fvarId : FVarId
attrs : Array Attribute
shortDeclName : Name
declName : Name
lctx : LocalContext
localInstances : LocalInstances
type : Expr
val : Expr
mvarId : MVarId
structure State where
levelNames : List Name := []
syntheticMVars : List SyntheticMVarDecl := []
mvarErrorInfos : List MVarErrorInfo := []
messages : MessageLog := {}
letRecsToLift : List LetRecToLift := []
infoState : InfoState := {}
deriving Inhabited
abbrev TermElabM := ReaderT Context $ StateRefT State MetaM
abbrev TermElab := Syntax → Option Expr → TermElabM Expr
open Meta
instance {α} : Inhabited (TermElabM α) where
default := throw arbitrary
structure SavedState where
core : Core.State
meta : Meta.State
«elab» : State
deriving Inhabited
def saveAllState : TermElabM SavedState := do
pure { core := (← getThe Core.State), meta := (← getThe Meta.State), «elab» := (← get) }
def SavedState.restore (s : SavedState) : TermElabM Unit := do
let traceState ← getTraceState -- We never backtrack trace message
set s.core
set s.meta
set s.elab
setTraceState traceState
abbrev TermElabResult (α : Type) := EStateM.Result Exception SavedState α
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (TermElabResult α) where
default := EStateM.Result.ok arbitrary arbitrary
def setMessageLog (messages : MessageLog) : TermElabM Unit :=
modify fun s => { s with messages := messages }
def resetMessageLog : TermElabM Unit :=
setMessageLog {}
def getMessageLog : TermElabM MessageLog :=
return (← get).messages
/--
Execute `x`, save resulting expression and new state.
If `x` fails, then it also stores exception and new state.
Remark: we do not capture `Exception.postpone`. -/
@[inline] def observing (x : TermElabM α) : TermElabM (TermElabResult α) := do
let s ← saveAllState
try
let e ← x
let sNew ← saveAllState
s.restore
pure (EStateM.Result.ok e sNew)
catch
| ex@(Exception.error _ _) =>
let sNew ← saveAllState
s.restore
pure (EStateM.Result.error ex sNew)
| ex@(Exception.internal id _) =>
if id == postponeExceptionId then s.restore
throw ex
/--
Apply the result/exception and state captured with `observing`.
We use this method to implement overloaded notation and symbols. -/
@[inline] def applyResult (result : TermElabResult α) : TermElabM α :=
match result with
| EStateM.Result.ok a r => do r.restore; pure a
| EStateM.Result.error ex r => do r.restore; throw ex
/--
Execute `x`, but keep state modifications only if `x` did not postpone.
This method is useful to implement elaboration functions that cannot decide whether
they need to postpone or not without updating the state. -/
def commitIfDidNotPostpone (x : TermElabM α) : TermElabM α := do
-- We just reuse the implementation of `observing` and `applyResult`.
let r ← observing x
applyResult r
@[inline] protected def liftMetaM {α} (x : MetaM α) : TermElabM α :=
liftM x
@[inline] def liftCoreM {α} (x : CoreM α) : TermElabM α :=
Term.liftMetaM $ liftM x
instance : MonadLiftT MetaM TermElabM where
monadLift := Term.liftMetaM
def getLevelNames : TermElabM (List Name) :=
return (← get).levelNames
def getFVarLocalDecl! (fvar : Expr) : TermElabM LocalDecl := do
match (← getLCtx).find? fvar.fvarId! with
| some d => pure d
| none => unreachable!
instance : AddErrorMessageContext TermElabM where
add ref msg := do
let ctx ← read
let ref := getBetterRef ref ctx.macroStack
let msg ← addMessageContext msg
let msg ← addMacroStack msg ctx.macroStack
pure (ref, msg)
instance : MonadLog TermElabM where
getRef := getRef
getFileMap := return (← read).fileMap
getFileName := return (← read).fileName
logMessage msg := do
let ctx ← readThe Core.Context
let msg := { msg with data := MessageData.withNamingContext { currNamespace := ctx.currNamespace, openDecls := ctx.openDecls } msg.data };
modify fun s => { s with messages := s.messages.add msg }
protected def getCurrMacroScope : TermElabM MacroScope := do pure (← read).currMacroScope
protected def getMainModule : TermElabM Name := do pure (← getEnv).mainModule
@[inline] protected def withFreshMacroScope {α} (x : TermElabM α) : TermElabM α := do
let fresh ← modifyGetThe Core.State (fun st => (st.nextMacroScope, { st with nextMacroScope := st.nextMacroScope + 1 }))
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with currMacroScope := fresh }) x
instance : MonadQuotation TermElabM where
getCurrMacroScope := Term.getCurrMacroScope
getMainModule := Term.getMainModule
withFreshMacroScope := Term.withFreshMacroScope
instance : MonadInfoTree TermElabM where
getInfoState := return (← get).infoState
modifyInfoState f := modify fun s => { s with infoState := f s.infoState }
unsafe def mkTermElabAttributeUnsafe : IO (KeyedDeclsAttribute TermElab) :=
mkElabAttribute TermElab `Lean.Elab.Term.termElabAttribute `builtinTermElab `termElab `Lean.Parser.Term `Lean.Elab.Term.TermElab "term"
@[implementedBy mkTermElabAttributeUnsafe]
constant mkTermElabAttribute : IO (KeyedDeclsAttribute TermElab)
builtin_initialize termElabAttribute : KeyedDeclsAttribute TermElab ← mkTermElabAttribute
/--
Auxiliary datatatype for presenting a Lean lvalue modifier.
We represent a unelaborated lvalue as a `Syntax` (or `Expr`) and `List LVal`.
Example: `a.foo[i].1` is represented as the `Syntax` `a` and the list
`[LVal.fieldName "foo", LVal.getOp i, LVal.fieldIdx 1]`.
Recall that the notation `a[i]` is not just for accessing arrays in Lean. -/
inductive LVal where
| fieldIdx (ref : Syntax) (i : Nat)
| fieldName (ref : Syntax) (name : String)
| getOp (ref : Syntax) (idx : Syntax)
def LVal.getRef : LVal → Syntax
| LVal.fieldIdx ref _ => ref
| LVal.fieldName ref _ => ref
| LVal.getOp ref _ => ref
instance : ToString LVal where
toString
| LVal.fieldIdx _ i => toString i
| LVal.fieldName _ n => n
| LVal.getOp _ idx => "[" ++ toString idx ++ "]"
def getDeclName? : TermElabM (Option Name) := return (← read).declName?
def getLetRecsToLift : TermElabM (List LetRecToLift) := return (← get).letRecsToLift
def isExprMVarAssigned (mvarId : MVarId) : TermElabM Bool := return (← getMCtx).isExprAssigned mvarId
def getMVarDecl (mvarId : MVarId) : TermElabM MetavarDecl := return (← getMCtx).getDecl mvarId
def assignLevelMVar (mvarId : MVarId) (val : Level) : TermElabM Unit := modifyThe Meta.State fun s => { s with mctx := s.mctx.assignLevel mvarId val }
def withDeclName {α} (name : Name) (x : TermElabM α) : TermElabM α :=
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with declName? := name }) x
def setLevelNames (levelNames : List Name) : TermElabM Unit :=
modify fun s => { s with levelNames := levelNames }
def withLevelNames {α} (levelNames : List Name) (x : TermElabM α) : TermElabM α := do
let levelNamesSaved ← getLevelNames
setLevelNames levelNames
try x finally setLevelNames levelNamesSaved
def withoutErrToSorry {α} (x : TermElabM α) : TermElabM α :=
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with errToSorry := false }) x
/-- Execute `x` with `autoBoundImplicit := (autoBoundImplicitLocal.get options) && flag` -/
def withAutoBoundImplicitLocal {α} (x : TermElabM α) (flag := true) : TermElabM α := do
let flag := autoBoundImplicitLocal.get (← getOptions) && flag
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with autoBoundImplicit := flag, autoBoundImplicits := {} }) x
/-- For testing `TermElabM` methods. The #eval command will sign the error. -/
def throwErrorIfErrors : TermElabM Unit := do
if (← get).messages.hasErrors then
throwError "Error(s)"
@[inline] def traceAtCmdPos (cls : Name) (msg : Unit → MessageData) : TermElabM Unit :=
withRef Syntax.missing $ trace cls msg
def ppGoal (mvarId : MVarId) : TermElabM Format := liftMetaM $ Meta.ppGoal mvarId
@[inline] def savingMCtx {α} (x : TermElabM α) : TermElabM α := do
let mctx ← getMCtx
try x finally setMCtx mctx
open Level (LevelElabM)
def liftLevelM {α} (x : LevelElabM α) : TermElabM α := do
let ctx ← read
let ref ← getRef
let mctx ← getMCtx
let ngen ← getNGen
let lvlCtx : Level.Context := { options := (← getOptions), ref := ref, autoBoundImplicit := ctx.autoBoundImplicit }
match (x lvlCtx).run { ngen := ngen, mctx := mctx, levelNames := (← getLevelNames) } with
| EStateM.Result.ok a newS => setMCtx newS.mctx; setNGen newS.ngen; setLevelNames newS.levelNames; pure a
| EStateM.Result.error ex _ => throw ex
def elabLevel (stx : Syntax) : TermElabM Level :=
liftLevelM $ Level.elabLevel stx
/- Elaborate `x` with `stx` on the macro stack -/
@[inline] def withMacroExpansion {α} (beforeStx afterStx : Syntax) (x : TermElabM α) : TermElabM α :=
withMacroExpansionInfo beforeStx afterStx do
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with macroStack := { before := beforeStx, after := afterStx } :: ctx.macroStack }) x
/-
Add the given metavariable to the list of pending synthetic metavariables.
The method `synthesizeSyntheticMVars` is used to process the metavariables on this list. -/
def registerSyntheticMVar (stx : Syntax) (mvarId : MVarId) (kind : SyntheticMVarKind) : TermElabM Unit := do
modify fun s => { s with syntheticMVars := { mvarId := mvarId, stx := stx, kind := kind } :: s.syntheticMVars }
def registerSyntheticMVarWithCurrRef (mvarId : MVarId) (kind : SyntheticMVarKind) : TermElabM Unit := do
registerSyntheticMVar (← getRef) mvarId kind
def registerMVarErrorHoleInfo (mvarId : MVarId) (ref : Syntax) : TermElabM Unit := do
modify fun s => { s with mvarErrorInfos := { mvarId := mvarId, ref := ref, kind := MVarErrorKind.hole } :: s.mvarErrorInfos }
def registerMVarErrorImplicitArgInfo (mvarId : MVarId) (ref : Syntax) (app : Expr) : TermElabM Unit := do
modify fun s => { s with mvarErrorInfos := { mvarId := mvarId, ref := ref, kind := MVarErrorKind.implicitArg app } :: s.mvarErrorInfos }
def registerMVarErrorCustomInfo (mvarId : MVarId) (ref : Syntax) (msgData : MessageData) : TermElabM Unit := do
modify fun s => { s with mvarErrorInfos := { mvarId := mvarId, ref := ref, kind := MVarErrorKind.custom msgData } :: s.mvarErrorInfos }
def registerCustomErrorIfMVar (e : Expr) (ref : Syntax) (msgData : MessageData) : TermElabM Unit :=
match e.getAppFn with
| Expr.mvar mvarId _ => registerMVarErrorCustomInfo mvarId ref msgData
| _ => pure ()
/-
Auxiliary method for reporting errors of the form "... contains metavariables ...".
This kind of error is thrown, for example, at `Match.lean` where elaboration
cannot continue if there are metavariables in patterns.
We only want to log it if we haven't logged any error so far. -/
def throwMVarError {α} (m : MessageData) : TermElabM α := do
if (← get).messages.hasErrors then
throwAbortTerm
else
throwError! m
def MVarErrorInfo.logError (mvarErrorInfo : MVarErrorInfo) : TermElabM Unit := do
match mvarErrorInfo.kind with
| MVarErrorKind.implicitArg app => do
let app ← instantiateMVars app
let msg : MessageData := m!"don't know how to synthesize implicit argument{indentExpr app.setAppPPExplicit}"
let msg := msg ++ Format.line ++ "context:" ++ Format.line ++ MessageData.ofGoal mvarErrorInfo.mvarId
logErrorAt mvarErrorInfo.ref msg
| MVarErrorKind.hole => do
let msg : MessageData := "don't know how to synthesize placeholder"
let msg := msg ++ Format.line ++ "context:" ++ Format.line ++ MessageData.ofGoal mvarErrorInfo.mvarId
logErrorAt mvarErrorInfo.ref msg
| MVarErrorKind.custom msgData =>
logErrorAt mvarErrorInfo.ref msgData
/--
Try to log errors for the unassigned metavariables `pendingMVarIds`.
Return `true` if there were "unfilled holes", and we should "abort" declaration.
TODO: try to fill "all" holes using synthetic "sorry's"
Remark: We only log the "unfilled holes" as new errors if no error has been logged so far. -/
def logUnassignedUsingErrorInfos (pendingMVarIds : Array MVarId) : TermElabM Bool := do
let s ← get
let hasOtherErrors := s.messages.hasErrors
let mut hasNewErrors := false
let mut alreadyVisited : NameSet := {}
for mvarErrorInfo in s.mvarErrorInfos do
let mvarId := mvarErrorInfo.mvarId
unless alreadyVisited.contains mvarId do
alreadyVisited := alreadyVisited.insert mvarId
let foundError ← withMVarContext mvarId do
/- The metavariable `mvarErrorInfo.mvarId` may have been assigned or
delayed assigned to another metavariable that is unassigned. -/
let mvarDeps ← getMVars (mkMVar mvarId)
if mvarDeps.any pendingMVarIds.contains then do
unless hasOtherErrors do
mvarErrorInfo.logError
pure true
else
pure false
if foundError then
hasNewErrors := true
return hasNewErrors
/-- Ensure metavariables registered using `registerMVarErrorInfos` (and used in the given declaration) have been assigned. -/
def ensureNoUnassignedMVars (decl : Declaration) : TermElabM Unit := do
let pendingMVarIds ← getMVarsAtDecl decl
if (← logUnassignedUsingErrorInfos pendingMVarIds) then
throwAbortCommand
/-
Execute `x` without allowing it to postpone elaboration tasks.
That is, `tryPostpone` is a noop. -/
@[inline] def withoutPostponing {α} (x : TermElabM α) : TermElabM α :=
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with mayPostpone := false }) x
/-- Creates syntax for `(` <ident> `:` <type> `)` -/
def mkExplicitBinder (ident : Syntax) (type : Syntax) : Syntax :=
mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.explicitBinder #[mkAtom "(", mkNullNode #[ident], mkNullNode #[mkAtom ":", type], mkNullNode, mkAtom ")"]
/--
Convert unassigned universe level metavariables into parameters.
The new parameter names are of the form `u_i` where `i >= nextParamIdx`.
The method returns the updated expression and new `nextParamIdx`.
Remark: we make sure the generated parameter names do not clash with the universes at `ctx.levelNames`. -/
def levelMVarToParam (e : Expr) (nextParamIdx : Nat := 1) : TermElabM (Expr × Nat) := do
let mctx ← getMCtx
let levelNames ← getLevelNames
let r := mctx.levelMVarToParam (fun n => levelNames.elem n) e `u nextParamIdx
setMCtx r.mctx
pure (r.expr, r.nextParamIdx)
/-- Variant of `levelMVarToParam` where `nextParamIdx` is stored in a state monad. -/
def levelMVarToParam' (e : Expr) : StateRefT Nat TermElabM Expr := do
let nextParamIdx ← get
let (e, nextParamIdx) ← levelMVarToParam e nextParamIdx
set nextParamIdx
pure e
/--
Auxiliary method for creating fresh binder names.
Do not confuse with the method for creating fresh free/meta variable ids. -/
def mkFreshBinderName : TermElabM Name :=
withFreshMacroScope $ MonadQuotation.addMacroScope `x
/--
Auxiliary method for creating a `Syntax.ident` containing
a fresh name. This method is intended for creating fresh binder names.
It is just a thin layer on top of `mkFreshUserName`. -/
def mkFreshIdent (ref : Syntax) : TermElabM Syntax :=
return mkIdentFrom ref (← mkFreshBinderName)
private def liftAttrM {α} (x : AttrM α) : TermElabM α := do
liftCoreM x
private def applyAttributesCore
(declName : Name) (attrs : Array Attribute)
(applicationTime? : Option AttributeApplicationTime) : TermElabM Unit :=
for attr in attrs do
let env ← getEnv
match getAttributeImpl env attr.name with
| Except.error errMsg => throwError errMsg
| Except.ok attrImpl =>
match applicationTime? with
| none => liftAttrM <| attrImpl.add declName attr.stx attr.kind
| some applicationTime =>
if applicationTime == attrImpl.applicationTime then
liftAttrM <| attrImpl.add declName attr.stx attr.kind
/-- Apply given attributes **at** a given application time -/
def applyAttributesAt (declName : Name) (attrs : Array Attribute) (applicationTime : AttributeApplicationTime) : TermElabM Unit :=
applyAttributesCore declName attrs applicationTime
def applyAttributes (declName : Name) (attrs : Array Attribute) : TermElabM Unit :=
applyAttributesCore declName attrs none
def mkTypeMismatchError (header? : Option String) (e : Expr) (eType : Expr) (expectedType : Expr) : TermElabM MessageData := do
let header : MessageData := match header? with
| some header => m!"{header} "
| none => m!"type mismatch{indentExpr e}\n"
m!"{header}{← mkHasTypeButIsExpectedMsg eType expectedType}"
def throwTypeMismatchError {α} (header? : Option String) (expectedType : Expr) (eType : Expr) (e : Expr)
(f? : Option Expr := none) (extraMsg? : Option MessageData := none) : TermElabM α := do
/-
We ignore `extraMsg?` for now. In all our tests, it contained no useful information. It was
always of the form:
```
failed to synthesize instance
CoeT <eType> <e> <expectedType>
```
We should revisit this decision in the future and decide whether it may contain useful information
or not. -/
let extraMsg := Format.nil
/-
let extraMsg : MessageData := match extraMsg? with
| none => Format.nil
| some extraMsg => Format.line ++ extraMsg;
-/
match f? with
| none => throwError <| (← mkTypeMismatchError header? e eType expectedType) ++ extraMsg
| some f => Meta.throwAppTypeMismatch f e extraMsg
@[inline] def withoutMacroStackAtErr {α} (x : TermElabM α) : TermElabM α :=
withTheReader Core.Context (fun (ctx : Core.Context) => { ctx with options := pp.macroStack.set ctx.options false }) x
/- Try to synthesize metavariable using type class resolution.
This method assumes the local context and local instances of `instMVar` coincide
with the current local context and local instances.
Return `true` if the instance was synthesized successfully, and `false` if
the instance contains unassigned metavariables that are blocking the type class
resolution procedure. Throw an exception if resolution or assignment irrevocably fails. -/
def synthesizeInstMVarCore (instMVar : MVarId) (maxResultSize? : Option Nat := none) : TermElabM Bool := do
let instMVarDecl ← getMVarDecl instMVar
let type := instMVarDecl.type
let type ← instantiateMVars type
let result ← trySynthInstance type maxResultSize?
match result with
| LOption.some val =>
if (← isExprMVarAssigned instMVar) then
let oldVal ← instantiateMVars (mkMVar instMVar)
unless (← isDefEq oldVal val) do
let oldValType ← inferType oldVal
let valType ← inferType val
unless (← isDefEq oldValType valType) do
throwError! "synthesized type class instance type is not definitionally equal to expected type, synthesized{indentExpr val}\nhas type{indentExpr valType}\nexpected{indentExpr oldValType}"
throwError! "synthesized type class instance is not definitionally equal to expression inferred by typing rules, synthesized{indentExpr val}\ninferred{indentExpr oldVal}"
else
unless (← isDefEq (mkMVar instMVar) val) do
throwError! "failed to assign synthesized type class instance{indentExpr val}"
pure true
| LOption.undef => pure false -- we will try later
| LOption.none => throwError! "failed to synthesize instance{indentExpr type}"
register_builtin_option maxCoeSize : Nat := {
defValue := 16
descr := "maximum number of instances used to construct an automatic coercion"
}
def synthesizeCoeInstMVarCore (instMVar : MVarId) : TermElabM Bool := do
synthesizeInstMVarCore instMVar (some (maxCoeSize.get (← getOptions)))
/-
The coercion from `α` to `Thunk α` cannot be implemented using an instance because it would
eagerly evaluate `e` -/
def tryCoeThunk? (expectedType : Expr) (eType : Expr) (e : Expr) : TermElabM (Option Expr) := do
match expectedType with
| Expr.app (Expr.const `Thunk u _) arg _ =>
if (← isDefEq eType arg) then
pure (some (mkApp2 (mkConst `Thunk.mk u) arg (mkSimpleThunk e)))
else
pure none
| _ =>
pure none
/--
Try to apply coercion to make sure `e` has type `expectedType`.
Relevant definitions:
```
class CoeT (α : Sort u) (a : α) (β : Sort v)
abbrev coe {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} (a : α) [CoeT α a β] : β
```
-/
private def tryCoe (errorMsgHeader? : Option String) (expectedType : Expr) (eType : Expr) (e : Expr) (f? : Option Expr) : TermElabM Expr := do
if (← isDefEq expectedType eType) then
pure e
else match (← tryCoeThunk? expectedType eType e) with
| some r => pure r
| none =>
let u ← getLevel eType
let v ← getLevel expectedType
let coeTInstType := mkAppN (mkConst `CoeT [u, v]) #[eType, e, expectedType]
let mvar ← mkFreshExprMVar coeTInstType MetavarKind.synthetic
let eNew := mkAppN (mkConst `coe [u, v]) #[eType, expectedType, e, mvar]
let mvarId := mvar.mvarId!
try
withoutMacroStackAtErr do
unless (← synthesizeCoeInstMVarCore mvarId) do
registerSyntheticMVarWithCurrRef mvarId (SyntheticMVarKind.coe errorMsgHeader? expectedType eType e f?)
pure eNew
catch
| Exception.error _ msg => throwTypeMismatchError errorMsgHeader? expectedType eType e f? msg
| _ => throwTypeMismatchError errorMsgHeader? expectedType eType e f?
private def isTypeApp? (type : Expr) : TermElabM (Option (Expr × Expr)) := do
let type ← withReducible $ whnf type
match type with
| Expr.app m α _ => pure (some ((← instantiateMVars m), (← instantiateMVars α)))
| _ => pure none
def synthesizeInst (type : Expr) : TermElabM Expr := do
let type ← instantiateMVars type
match (← trySynthInstance type) with
| LOption.some val => pure val
| LOption.undef => throwError! "failed to synthesize instance{indentExpr type}"
| LOption.none => throwError! "failed to synthesize instance{indentExpr type}"
def isMonadApp (type : Expr) : TermElabM Bool := do
let some (m, _) ← isTypeApp? type | pure false
return (← isMonad? m) |>.isSome
/--
Try to coerce `a : α` into `m β` by first coercing `a : α` into ‵β`, and then using `pure`.
The method is only applied if `α` is not monadic (e.g., `Nat → IO Unit`), and the head symbol
of the resulting type is not a metavariable (e.g., `?m Unit` or `Bool → ?m Nat`).
The main limitation of the approach above is polymorphic code. As usual, coercions and polymorphism
do not interact well. In the example above, the lift is successfully applied to `true`, `false` and `!y`
since none of them is polymorphic
```
def f (x : Bool) : IO Bool := do
let y ← if x == 0 then IO.println "hello"; true else false;
!y
```
On the other hand, the following fails since `+` is polymorphic
```
def f (x : Bool) : IO Nat := do
IO.prinln x
x + x -- Error: failed to synthesize `Add (IO Nat)`
```
-/
private def tryPureCoe? (errorMsgHeader? : Option String) (m β α a : Expr) : TermElabM (Option Expr) := do
let doIt : TermElabM (Option Expr) := do
try
let aNew ← tryCoe errorMsgHeader? β α a none
let aNew ← mkPure m aNew
pure (some aNew)
catch _ =>
pure none
forallTelescope α fun _ α => do
if (← isMonadApp α) then
pure none
else if !α.getAppFn.isMVar then
doIt
else
pure none
/-
Try coercions and monad lifts to make sure `e` has type `expectedType`.
If `expectedType` is of the form `n β`, we try monad lifts and other extensions.
Otherwise, we just use the basic `tryCoe`.
Extensions for monads.
Given an expected type of the form `n β`, if `eType` is of the form `α`, but not `m α`
1 - Try to coerce ‵α` into ‵β`, and use `pure` to lift it to `n α`.
It only works if `n` implements `Pure`
If `eType` is of the form `m α`. We use the following approaches.
1- Try to unify `n` and `m`. If it succeeds, then we use
```
coeM {m : Type u → Type v} {α β : Type u} [∀ a, CoeT α a β] [Monad m] (x : m α) : m β
```
`n` must be a `Monad` to use this one.
2- If there is monad lift from `m` to `n` and we can unify `α` and `β`, we use
```
liftM : ∀ {m : Type u_1 → Type u_2} {n : Type u_1 → Type u_3} [self : MonadLiftT m n] {α : Type u_1}, m α → n α
```
Note that `n` may not be a `Monad` in this case. This happens quite a bit in code such as
```
def g (x : Nat) : IO Nat := do
IO.println x
pure x
def f {m} [MonadLiftT IO m] : m Nat :=
g 10
```
3- If there is a monad lif from `m` to `n` and a coercion from `α` to `β`, we use
```
liftCoeM {m : Type u → Type v} {n : Type u → Type w} {α β : Type u} [MonadLiftT m n] [∀ a, CoeT α a β] [Monad n] (x : m α) : n β
```
Note that approach 3 does not subsume 1 because it is only applicable if there is a coercion from `α` to `β` for all values in `α`.
This is not the case for example for `pure $ x > 0` when the expected type is `IO Bool`. The given type is `IO Prop`, and
we only have a coercion from decidable propositions. Approach 1 works because it constructs the coercion `CoeT (m Prop) (pure $ x > 0) (m Bool)`
using the instance `pureCoeDepProp`.
Note that, approach 2 is more powerful than `tryCoe`.
Recall that type class resolution never assigns metavariables created by other modules.
Now, consider the following scenario
```lean
def g (x : Nat) : IO Nat := ...
deg h (x : Nat) : StateT Nat IO Nat := do
v ← g x;
IO.Println v;
...
```
Let's assume there is no other occurrence of `v` in `h`.
Thus, we have that the expected of `g x` is `StateT Nat IO ?α`,
and the given type is `IO Nat`. So, even if we add a coercion.
```
instance {α m n} [MonadLiftT m n] {α} : Coe (m α) (n α) := ...
```
It is not applicable because TC would have to assign `?α := Nat`.
On the other hand, TC can easily solve `[MonadLiftT IO (StateT Nat IO)]`
since this goal does not contain any metavariables. And then, we
convert `g x` into `liftM $ g x`.
-/
private def tryLiftAndCoe (errorMsgHeader? : Option String) (expectedType : Expr) (eType : Expr) (e : Expr) (f? : Option Expr) : TermElabM Expr := do
let expectedType ← instantiateMVars expectedType
let eType ← instantiateMVars eType
let throwMismatch {α} : TermElabM α := throwTypeMismatchError errorMsgHeader? expectedType eType e f?
let tryCoeSimple : TermElabM Expr :=
tryCoe errorMsgHeader? expectedType eType e f?
let some (n, β) ← isTypeApp? expectedType | tryCoeSimple
let tryPureCoeAndSimple : TermElabM Expr := do
match (← tryPureCoe? errorMsgHeader? n β eType e) with
| some eNew => pure eNew
| none => tryCoeSimple
let some (m, α) ← isTypeApp? eType | tryPureCoeAndSimple
if (← isDefEq m n) then
let some monadInst ← isMonad? n | tryCoeSimple
try mkAppOptM `coeM #[m, α, β, none, monadInst, e] catch _ => throwMismatch
else
try
-- Construct lift from `m` to `n`
let monadLiftType ← mkAppM `MonadLiftT #[m, n]
let monadLiftVal ← synthesizeInst monadLiftType
let u_1 ← getDecLevel α
let u_2 ← getDecLevel eType
let u_3 ← getDecLevel expectedType
let eNew := mkAppN (Lean.mkConst `liftM [u_1, u_2, u_3]) #[m, n, monadLiftVal, α, e]
let eNewType ← inferType eNew
if (← isDefEq expectedType eNewType) then
pure eNew -- approach 2 worked
else
let some monadInst ← isMonad? n | tryCoeSimple
let u ← getLevel α
let v ← getLevel β
let coeTInstType := Lean.mkForall `a BinderInfo.default α $ mkAppN (mkConst `CoeT [u, v]) #[α, mkBVar 0, β]
let coeTInstVal ← synthesizeInst coeTInstType
let eNew := mkAppN (Lean.mkConst `liftCoeM [u_1, u_2, u_3]) #[m, n, α, β, monadLiftVal, coeTInstVal, monadInst, e]
let eNewType ← inferType eNew
unless (← isDefEq expectedType eNewType) do throwMismatch
pure eNew -- approach 3 worked
catch _ =>
/-
If `m` is not a monad, then we try to use `tryPureCoe?` and then `tryCoe?`.
Otherwise, we just try `tryCoe?`.
-/
match (← isMonad? m) with
| none => tryPureCoeAndSimple
| some _ => tryCoeSimple
/--
If `expectedType?` is `some t`, then ensure `t` and `eType` are definitionally equal.
If they are not, then try coercions.
Argument `f?` is used only for generating error messages. -/
def ensureHasTypeAux (expectedType? : Option Expr) (eType : Expr) (e : Expr)
(f? : Option Expr := none) (errorMsgHeader? : Option String := none) : TermElabM Expr := do
match expectedType? with
| none => pure e
| some expectedType =>
if (← isDefEq eType expectedType) then
pure e
else
tryLiftAndCoe errorMsgHeader? expectedType eType e f?
/--
If `expectedType?` is `some t`, then ensure `t` and type of `e` are definitionally equal.
If they are not, then try coercions. -/
def ensureHasType (expectedType? : Option Expr) (e : Expr) (errorMsgHeader? : Option String := none) : TermElabM Expr :=
match expectedType? with
| none => pure e
| _ => do
let eType ← inferType e
ensureHasTypeAux expectedType? eType e none errorMsgHeader?
private def exceptionToSorry (ex : Exception) (expectedType? : Option Expr) : TermElabM Expr := do
let expectedType ← match expectedType? with
| none => mkFreshTypeMVar
| some expectedType => pure expectedType
let syntheticSorry ← mkSyntheticSorry expectedType
logException ex
pure syntheticSorry
/-- If `mayPostpone == true`, throw `Expection.postpone`. -/
def tryPostpone : TermElabM Unit := do
if (← read).mayPostpone then
throwPostpone
/-- If `mayPostpone == true` and `e`'s head is a metavariable, throw `Exception.postpone`. -/
def tryPostponeIfMVar (e : Expr) : TermElabM Unit := do
if e.getAppFn.isMVar then
let e ← instantiateMVars e
if e.getAppFn.isMVar then
tryPostpone
def tryPostponeIfNoneOrMVar (e? : Option Expr) : TermElabM Unit :=
match e? with
| some e => tryPostponeIfMVar e
| none => tryPostpone
def tryPostponeIfHasMVars (expectedType? : Option Expr) (msg : String) : TermElabM Expr := do
tryPostponeIfNoneOrMVar expectedType?
let some expectedType ← pure expectedType? |
throwError! "{msg}, expected type must be known"
let expectedType ← instantiateMVars expectedType
if expectedType.hasExprMVar then
tryPostpone
throwError! "{msg}, expected type contains metavariables{indentExpr expectedType}"
pure expectedType
private def postponeElabTerm (stx : Syntax) (expectedType? : Option Expr) : TermElabM Expr := do
trace[Elab.postpone]! "{stx} : {expectedType?}"
let mvar ← mkFreshExprMVar expectedType? MetavarKind.syntheticOpaque
let ctx ← read
registerSyntheticMVar stx mvar.mvarId! (SyntheticMVarKind.postponed ctx.macroStack ctx.declName?)
pure mvar
/-
Helper function for `elabTerm` is tries the registered elaboration functions for `stxNode` kind until it finds one that supports the syntax or
an error is found. -/
private def elabUsingElabFnsAux (s : SavedState) (stx : Syntax) (expectedType? : Option Expr) (catchExPostpone : Bool)
: List TermElab → TermElabM Expr
| [] => do throwError! "unexpected syntax{indentD stx}"
| (elabFn::elabFns) => do
try
elabFn stx expectedType?
catch ex => match ex with
| Exception.error _ _ =>
if (← read).errToSorry then
exceptionToSorry ex expectedType?
else
throw ex
| Exception.internal id _ =>
if (← read).errToSorry && id == abortTermExceptionId then
exceptionToSorry ex expectedType?
else if id == unsupportedSyntaxExceptionId then
s.restore
elabUsingElabFnsAux s stx expectedType? catchExPostpone elabFns
else if catchExPostpone && id == postponeExceptionId then
/- If `elab` threw `Exception.postpone`, we reset any state modifications.
For example, we want to make sure pending synthetic metavariables created by `elab` before
it threw `Exception.postpone` are discarded.
Note that we are also discarding the messages created by `elab`.
For example, consider the expression.
`((f.x a1).x a2).x a3`
Now, suppose the elaboration of `f.x a1` produces an `Exception.postpone`.
Then, a new metavariable `?m` is created. Then, `?m.x a2` also throws `Exception.postpone`
because the type of `?m` is not yet known. Then another, metavariable `?n` is created, and
finally `?n.x a3` also throws `Exception.postpone`. If we did not restore the state, we would
keep "dead" metavariables `?m` and `?n` on the pending synthetic metavariable list. This is
wasteful because when we resume the elaboration of `((f.x a1).x a2).x a3`, we start it from scratch
and new metavariables are created for the nested functions. -/
s.restore
postponeElabTerm stx expectedType?
else
throw ex
private def elabUsingElabFns (stx : Syntax) (expectedType? : Option Expr) (catchExPostpone : Bool) : TermElabM Expr := do
let s ← saveAllState
let table := termElabAttribute.ext.getState (← getEnv) |>.table
let k := stx.getKind
match table.find? k with
| some elabFns => elabUsingElabFnsAux s stx expectedType? catchExPostpone elabFns
| none => throwError! "elaboration function for '{k}' has not been implemented"
instance : MonadMacroAdapter TermElabM where
getCurrMacroScope := getCurrMacroScope
getNextMacroScope := return (← getThe Core.State).nextMacroScope
setNextMacroScope next := modifyThe Core.State fun s => { s with nextMacroScope := next }
private def isExplicit (stx : Syntax) : Bool :=
match stx with
| `(@$f) => true
| _ => false
private def isExplicitApp (stx : Syntax) : Bool :=
stx.getKind == `Lean.Parser.Term.app && isExplicit stx[0]
/--
Return true if `stx` if a lambda abstraction containing a `{}` or `[]` binder annotation.
Example: `fun {α} (a : α) => a` -/
private def isLambdaWithImplicit (stx : Syntax) : Bool :=
match stx with
| `(fun $binders* => $body) => binders.any fun b => b.isOfKind `Lean.Parser.Term.implicitBinder || b.isOfKind `Lean.Parser.Term.instBinder
| _ => false
private partial def dropTermParens : Syntax → Syntax | stx =>
match stx with
| `(($stx)) => dropTermParens stx
| _ => stx
/-- Block usage of implicit lambdas if `stx` is `@f` or `@f arg1 ...` or `fun` with an implicit binder annotation. -/
def blockImplicitLambda (stx : Syntax) : Bool :=
let stx := dropTermParens stx
isExplicit stx || isExplicitApp stx || isLambdaWithImplicit stx
/--
Return normalized expected type if it is of the form `{a : α} → β` or `[a : α] → β` and
`blockImplicitLambda stx` is not true, else return `none`. -/
private def useImplicitLambda? (stx : Syntax) (expectedType? : Option Expr) : TermElabM (Option Expr) :=
if blockImplicitLambda stx then
pure none
else match expectedType? with
| some expectedType => do
let expectedType ← whnfForall expectedType
match expectedType with
| Expr.forallE _ _ _ c => if c.binderInfo.isExplicit then pure none else pure $ some expectedType
| _ => pure none
| _ => pure none
private def elabImplicitLambdaAux (stx : Syntax) (catchExPostpone : Bool) (expectedType : Expr) (fvars : Array Expr) : TermElabM Expr := do
let body ← elabUsingElabFns stx expectedType catchExPostpone
let body ← ensureHasType expectedType body
let r ← mkLambdaFVars fvars body
trace[Elab.implicitForall]! r
pure r
private partial def elabImplicitLambda (stx : Syntax) (catchExPostpone : Bool) : Expr → Array Expr → TermElabM Expr
| type@(Expr.forallE n d b c), fvars =>
if c.binderInfo.isExplicit then
elabImplicitLambdaAux stx catchExPostpone type fvars
else withFreshMacroScope do
let n ← MonadQuotation.addMacroScope n
withLocalDecl n c.binderInfo d fun fvar => do
let type ← whnfForall (b.instantiate1 fvar)
elabImplicitLambda stx catchExPostpone type (fvars.push fvar)
| type, fvars =>
elabImplicitLambdaAux stx catchExPostpone type fvars
/- Main loop for `elabTerm` -/
private partial def elabTermAux (expectedType? : Option Expr) (catchExPostpone : Bool) (implicitLambda : Bool) : Syntax → TermElabM Expr
| stx => withFreshMacroScope $ withIncRecDepth do
trace[Elab.step]! "expected type: {expectedType?}, term\n{stx}"
checkMaxHeartbeats "elaborator"
withNestedTraces do
let env ← getEnv
let stxNew? ← catchInternalId unsupportedSyntaxExceptionId
(do let newStx ← adaptMacro (getMacros env) stx; pure (some newStx))
(fun _ => pure none)
match stxNew? with
| some stxNew => withMacroExpansion stx stxNew $ elabTermAux expectedType? catchExPostpone implicitLambda stxNew
| _ =>
let implicit? ← if implicitLambda then useImplicitLambda? stx expectedType? else pure none
match implicit? with
| some expectedType => elabImplicitLambda stx catchExPostpone expectedType #[]
| none => elabUsingElabFns stx expectedType? catchExPostpone
def addTermInfo (stx : Syntax) (e : Expr) : TermElabM Unit := do
if (← getInfoState).enabled then
pushInfoTree <| InfoTree.node (children := {}) <| Info.ofTermInfo { lctx := (← getLCtx), expr := e, stx := stx }
def mkTermInfo (stx : Syntax) (e : Expr) : TermElabM (Sum Info MVarId) := do
let isHole? : TermElabM (Option MVarId) := do
match e with
| Expr.mvar mvarId _ =>
let isHole := (← get).syntheticMVars.any fun d => match d.kind with
| SyntheticMVarKind.tactic .. => true
| SyntheticMVarKind.postponed .. => true
| _ => false
if isHole then pure mvarId else pure none
| _ => pure none
match (← isHole?) with
| none => return Sum.inl <| Info.ofTermInfo { lctx := (← getLCtx), expr := e, stx := stx }
| some mvarId => return Sum.inr mvarId
/--
Main function for elaborating terms.
It extracts the elaboration methods from the environment using the node kind.
Recall that the environment has a mapping from `SyntaxNodeKind` to `TermElab` methods.
It creates a fresh macro scope for executing the elaboration method.
All unlogged trace messages produced by the elaboration method are logged using
the position information at `stx`. If the elaboration method throws an `Exception.error` and `errToSorry == true`,
the error is logged and a synthetic sorry expression is returned.
If the elaboration throws `Exception.postpone` and `catchExPostpone == true`,
a new synthetic metavariable of kind `SyntheticMVarKind.postponed` is created, registered,
and returned.
The option `catchExPostpone == false` is used to implement `resumeElabTerm`
to prevent the creation of another synthetic metavariable when resuming the elaboration. -/
def elabTerm (stx : Syntax) (expectedType? : Option Expr) (catchExPostpone := true) : TermElabM Expr :=
withInfoContext' (withRef stx <| elabTermAux expectedType? catchExPostpone true stx) (mkTermInfo stx)
def elabTermEnsuringType (stx : Syntax) (expectedType? : Option Expr) (catchExPostpone := true) (errorMsgHeader? : Option String := none) : TermElabM Expr := do
let e ← elabTerm stx expectedType? catchExPostpone
withRef stx $ ensureHasType expectedType? e errorMsgHeader?
def elabTermWithoutImplicitLambdas (stx : Syntax) (expectedType? : Option Expr) (catchExPostpone := true) : TermElabM Expr := do
elabTermAux expectedType? catchExPostpone false stx
/-- Adapt a syntax transformation to a regular, term-producing elaborator. -/
def adaptExpander (exp : Syntax → TermElabM Syntax) : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? => do
let stx' ← exp stx
withMacroExpansion stx stx' $ elabTerm stx' expectedType?
def mkInstMVar (type : Expr) : TermElabM Expr := do
let mvar ← mkFreshExprMVar type MetavarKind.synthetic
let mvarId := mvar.mvarId!
unless (← synthesizeInstMVarCore mvarId) do
registerSyntheticMVarWithCurrRef mvarId SyntheticMVarKind.typeClass
pure mvar
/-
Relevant definitions:
```
class CoeSort (α : Sort u) (β : outParam (Sort v))
abbrev coeSort {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} (a : α) [CoeSort α β] : β
```
-/
private def tryCoeSort (α : Expr) (a : Expr) : TermElabM Expr := do
let β ← mkFreshTypeMVar
let u ← getLevel α
let v ← getLevel β
let coeSortInstType := mkAppN (Lean.mkConst `CoeSort [u, v]) #[α, β]
let mvar ← mkFreshExprMVar coeSortInstType MetavarKind.synthetic
let mvarId := mvar.mvarId!
try
withoutMacroStackAtErr do
if (← synthesizeCoeInstMVarCore mvarId) then
pure $ mkAppN (Lean.mkConst `coeSort [u, v]) #[α, β, a, mvar]
else
throwError "type expected"
catch
| Exception.error _ msg => throwError! "type expected\n{msg}"
| _ => throwError! "type expected"
/--
Make sure `e` is a type by inferring its type and making sure it is a `Expr.sort`
or is unifiable with `Expr.sort`, or can be coerced into one. -/
def ensureType (e : Expr) : TermElabM Expr := do
if (← isType e) then
pure e
else
let eType ← inferType e
let u ← mkFreshLevelMVar
if (← isDefEq eType (mkSort u)) then
pure e
else
tryCoeSort eType e
/-- Elaborate `stx` and ensure result is a type. -/
def elabType (stx : Syntax) : TermElabM Expr := do
let u ← mkFreshLevelMVar
let type ← elabTerm stx (mkSort u)
withRef stx $ ensureType type
/--
Elaborate `stx` creating new implicit variables for unbound ones when `autoBoundImplicit == true`, and then
execute the continuation `k` in the potentially extended local context.
The auto bound implicit locals are stored in the context variable `autoBoundImplicits`
-/
partial def elabTypeWithAutoBoundImplicit {α} (stx : Syntax) (k : Expr → TermElabM α) : TermElabM α := do
if (← read).autoBoundImplicit then
let rec loop : TermElabM α := do
let s ← saveAllState
try
k (← elabType stx)
catch
| ex => match isAutoBoundImplicitLocalException? ex with
| some n =>
-- Restore state, declare `n`, and try again
s.restore
withLocalDecl n BinderInfo.implicit (← mkFreshTypeMVar) fun x =>
withReader (fun ctx => { ctx with autoBoundImplicits := ctx.autoBoundImplicits.push x } )
loop
| none => throw ex
loop
else
k (← elabType stx)
/--
Return `autoBoundImplicits ++ xs.
This methoid throws an error if a variable in `autoBoundImplicits` depends on some `x` in `xs` -/
def addAutoBoundImplicits (xs : Array Expr) : TermElabM (Array Expr) := do
let autoBoundImplicits := (← read).autoBoundImplicits
for auto in autoBoundImplicits do
let localDecl ← getLocalDecl auto.fvarId!
for x in xs do
if (← getMCtx).localDeclDependsOn localDecl x.fvarId! then
throwError! "invalid auto implicit argument '{auto}', it depends on explicitly provided argument '{x}'"
return autoBoundImplicits.toArray ++ xs
def mkAuxName (suffix : Name) : TermElabM Name := do
match (← read).declName? with
| none => throwError "auxiliary declaration cannot be created when declaration name is not available"
| some declName => Lean.mkAuxName (declName ++ suffix) 1
builtin_initialize registerTraceClass `Elab.letrec
/- Return true if mvarId is an auxiliary metavariable created for compiling `let rec` or it
is delayed assigned to one. -/
def isLetRecAuxMVar (mvarId : MVarId) : TermElabM Bool := do
trace[Elab.letrec]! "mvarId: {mkMVar mvarId} letrecMVars: {(← get).letRecsToLift.map (mkMVar $ ·.mvarId)}"
let mvarId := (← getMCtx).getDelayedRoot mvarId
trace[Elab.letrec]! "mvarId root: {mkMVar mvarId}"
return (← get).letRecsToLift.any (·.mvarId == mvarId)
/- =======================================
Builtin elaboration functions
======================================= -/
@[builtinTermElab «prop»] def elabProp : TermElab := fun _ _ =>
return mkSort levelZero
private def elabOptLevel (stx : Syntax) : TermElabM Level :=
if stx.isNone then
pure levelZero
else
elabLevel stx[0]
@[builtinTermElab «sort»] def elabSort : TermElab := fun stx _ =>
return mkSort (← elabOptLevel stx[1])
@[builtinTermElab «type»] def elabTypeStx : TermElab := fun stx _ =>
return mkSort (mkLevelSucc (← elabOptLevel stx[1]))
@[builtinTermElab «hole»] def elabHole : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? => do
let mvar ← mkFreshExprMVar expectedType?
registerMVarErrorHoleInfo mvar.mvarId! stx
pure mvar
@[builtinTermElab «syntheticHole»] def elabSyntheticHole : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? => do
let arg := stx[1]
let userName := if arg.isIdent then arg.getId else Name.anonymous
let mkNewHole : Unit → TermElabM Expr := fun _ => do
let mvar ← mkFreshExprMVar expectedType? MetavarKind.syntheticOpaque userName
registerMVarErrorHoleInfo mvar.mvarId! stx
pure mvar
if userName.isAnonymous then
mkNewHole ()
else
let mctx ← getMCtx
match mctx.findUserName? userName with
| none => mkNewHole ()
| some mvarId =>
let mvar := mkMVar mvarId
let mvarDecl ← getMVarDecl mvarId
let lctx ← getLCtx
if mvarDecl.lctx.isSubPrefixOf lctx then
pure mvar
else match mctx.getExprAssignment? mvarId with
| some val =>
let val ← instantiateMVars val
if mctx.isWellFormed lctx val then
pure val
else
withLCtx mvarDecl.lctx mvarDecl.localInstances do
throwError! "synthetic hole has already been defined and assigned to value incompatible with the current context{indentExpr val}"
| none =>
if mctx.isDelayedAssigned mvarId then
-- We can try to improve this case if needed.
throwError "synthetic hole has already beend defined and delayed assigned with an incompatible local context"
else if lctx.isSubPrefixOf mvarDecl.lctx then
let mvarNew ← mkNewHole ()
modifyMCtx fun mctx => mctx.assignExpr mvarId mvarNew
pure mvarNew
else
throwError "synthetic hole has already been defined with an incompatible local context"
private def mkTacticMVar (type : Expr) (tacticCode : Syntax) : TermElabM Expr := do
let mvar ← mkFreshExprMVar type MetavarKind.syntheticOpaque
let mvarId := mvar.mvarId!
let ref ← getRef
let declName? ← getDeclName?
registerSyntheticMVar ref mvarId $ SyntheticMVarKind.tactic declName? tacticCode
pure mvar
@[builtinTermElab byTactic] def elabByTactic : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? =>
match expectedType? with
| some expectedType => mkTacticMVar expectedType stx
| none => throwError ("invalid 'by' tactic, expected type has not been provided")
def resolveLocalName (n : Name) : TermElabM (Option (Expr × List String)) := do
let lctx ← getLCtx
let view := extractMacroScopes n
let rec loop (n : Name) (projs : List String) :=
match lctx.findFromUserName? { view with name := n }.review with
| some decl => some (decl.toExpr, projs)
| none => match n with
| Name.str pre s _ => loop pre (s::projs)
| _ => none
pure $ loop view.name []
/- Return true iff `stx` is a `Syntax.ident`, and it is a local variable. -/
def isLocalIdent? (stx : Syntax) : TermElabM (Option Expr) :=
match stx with
| Syntax.ident _ _ val _ => do
let r? ← resolveLocalName val
match r? with
| some (fvar, []) => pure (some fvar)
| _ => pure none
| _ => pure none
def mkFreshLevelMVars (num : Nat) : MetaM (List Level) :=
num.foldM (init := []) fun _ us =>
return (← mkFreshLevelMVar)::us
/--
Create an `Expr.const` using the given name and explicit levels.
Remark: fresh universe metavariables are created if the constant has more universe
parameters than `explicitLevels`. -/
def mkConst (constName : Name) (explicitLevels : List Level := []) : TermElabM Expr := do
let cinfo ← getConstInfo constName
if explicitLevels.length > cinfo.lparams.length then
throwError "too many explicit universe levels"
else
let numMissingLevels := cinfo.lparams.length - explicitLevels.length
let us ← mkFreshLevelMVars numMissingLevels
pure $ Lean.mkConst constName (explicitLevels ++ us)
private def mkConsts (candidates : List (Name × List String)) (explicitLevels : List Level) : TermElabM (List (Expr × List String)) := do
candidates.foldlM (init := []) fun result (constName, projs) => do
-- TODO: better suppor for `mkConst` failure. We may want to cache the failures, and report them if all candidates fail.
let const ← mkConst constName explicitLevels
pure $ (const, projs) :: result
def resolveName (n : Name) (preresolved : List (Name × List String)) (explicitLevels : List Level) : TermElabM (List (Expr × List String)) := do
if let some (e, projs) ← resolveLocalName n then
unless explicitLevels.isEmpty do
throwError! "invalid use of explicit universe parameters, '{e}' is a local"
return [(e, projs)]
-- check for section variable capture by a quotation
if let some (e, projs) := preresolved.findSome? fun (n, projs) => (← read).sectionFVars.find? n |>.map (·, projs) then
return [(e, projs)] -- section variables should shadow global decls
if preresolved.isEmpty then
process (← resolveGlobalName n)
else
process preresolved
where process (candidates : List (Name × List String)) : TermElabM (List (Expr × List String)) := do
if candidates.isEmpty then
if (← read).autoBoundImplicit && isValidAutoBoundImplicitName n then
throwAutoBoundImplicitLocal n
else
throwError! "unknown identifier '{Lean.mkConst n}'"
mkConsts candidates explicitLevels
/--
Similar to `resolveName`, but creates identifiers for the main part and each projection with position information derived from `ident`.
Example: Assume resolveName `v.head.bla.boo` produces `(v.head, ["bla", "boo"])`, then this method produces
`(v.head, id, [f₁, f₂])` where `id` is an identifier for `v.head`, and `f₁` and `f₂` are identifiers for fields `"bla"` and `"boo"`. -/
def resolveName' (ident : Syntax) (explicitLevels : List Level) : TermElabM (List (Expr × Syntax × List Syntax)) := do
match ident with
| Syntax.ident info rawStr n preresolved =>
let r ← resolveName n preresolved explicitLevels
r.mapM fun (c, fields) => do
let (cSstr, fields) := fields.foldr (init := (rawStr, [])) fun field (restSstr, fs) =>
let fieldSstr := restSstr.takeRightWhile (· ≠ '.')
({ restSstr with stopPos := restSstr.stopPos - (fieldSstr.bsize + 1) }, (field, fieldSstr) :: fs)
let mkIdentFromPos pos rawVal val :=
let info := match info with
| SourceInfo.original .. => SourceInfo.original "".toSubstring pos "".toSubstring
| _ => SourceInfo.synthetic pos (pos + rawVal.bsize)
Syntax.ident info rawVal val []
let id := match c with
| Expr.const id _ _ => id
| Expr.fvar id _ => id
| _ => unreachable!
let id := mkIdentFromPos (ident.getPos?.getD 0) cSstr id
match info.getPos? with
| none =>
return (c, id, fields.map fun (field, _) => mkIdentFrom ident (Name.mkSimple field))
| some pos =>
let mut pos := pos + cSstr.bsize + 1
let mut newFields := #[]
for (field, fieldSstr) in fields do
newFields := newFields.push <| mkIdentFromPos pos fieldSstr (Name.mkSimple field)
pos := pos + fieldSstr.bsize + 1
return (c, id, newFields.toList)
| _ => throwError! "identifier expected"
def resolveId? (stx : Syntax) (kind := "term") : TermElabM (Option Expr) :=
match stx with
| Syntax.ident _ _ val preresolved => do
let rs ← try resolveName val preresolved [] catch _ => pure []
let rs := rs.filter fun ⟨f, projs⟩ => projs.isEmpty
let fs := rs.map fun (f, _) => f
match fs with
| [] => pure none
| [f] => pure (some f)
| _ => throwError! "ambiguous {kind}, use fully qualified name, possible interpretations {fs}"
| _ => throwError "identifier expected"
@[builtinTermElab cdot] def elabBadCDot : TermElab := fun stx _ =>
throwError "invalid occurrence of `·` notation, it must be surrounded by parentheses (e.g. `(· + 1)`)"
@[builtinTermElab strLit] def elabStrLit : TermElab := fun stx _ => do
match stx.isStrLit? with
| some val => pure $ mkStrLit val
| none => throwIllFormedSyntax
private def mkFreshTypeMVarFor (expectedType? : Option Expr) : TermElabM Expr := do
let typeMVar ← mkFreshTypeMVar MetavarKind.synthetic
match expectedType? with
| some expectedType => discard <| isDefEq expectedType typeMVar
| _ => pure ()
return typeMVar
@[builtinTermElab numLit] def elabNumLit : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? => do
let val ← match stx.isNatLit? with
| some val => pure val
| none => throwIllFormedSyntax
let typeMVar ← mkFreshTypeMVarFor expectedType?
let u ← getDecLevel typeMVar
let mvar ← mkInstMVar (mkApp2 (Lean.mkConst `OfNat [u]) typeMVar (mkNatLit val))
return mkApp3 (Lean.mkConst `OfNat.ofNat [u]) typeMVar (mkNatLit val) mvar
@[builtinTermElab rawNatLit] def elabRawNatLit : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? => do
match stx[1].isNatLit? with
| some val => return mkNatLit val
| none => throwIllFormedSyntax
@[builtinTermElab scientificLit]
def elabScientificLit : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? => do
match stx.isScientificLit? with
| none => throwIllFormedSyntax
| some (m, sign, e) =>
let typeMVar ← mkFreshTypeMVarFor expectedType?
let u ← getDecLevel typeMVar
let mvar ← mkInstMVar (mkApp (Lean.mkConst `OfScientific [u]) typeMVar)
return mkApp5 (Lean.mkConst `OfScientific.ofScientific [u]) typeMVar mvar (mkNatLit m) (toExpr sign) (mkNatLit e)
@[builtinTermElab charLit] def elabCharLit : TermElab := fun stx _ => do
match stx.isCharLit? with
| some val => return mkApp (Lean.mkConst `Char.ofNat) (mkNatLit val.toNat)
| none => throwIllFormedSyntax
@[builtinTermElab quotedName] def elabQuotedName : TermElab := fun stx _ =>
match stx[0].isNameLit? with
| some val => pure $ toExpr val
| none => throwIllFormedSyntax
@[builtinTermElab doubleQuotedName] def elabDoubleQuotedName : TermElab := fun stx _ => do
match stx[1].isNameLit? with
| some val => toExpr (← resolveGlobalConstNoOverload val)
| none => throwIllFormedSyntax
@[builtinTermElab typeOf] def elabTypeOf : TermElab := fun stx _ => do
inferType (← elabTerm stx[1] none)
@[builtinTermElab ensureTypeOf] def elabEnsureTypeOf : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? =>
match stx[2].isStrLit? with
| none => throwIllFormedSyntax
| some msg => do
let refTerm ← elabTerm stx[1] none
let refTermType ← inferType refTerm
elabTermEnsuringType stx[3] refTermType true msg
@[builtinTermElab ensureExpectedType] def elabEnsureExpectedType : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? =>
match stx[1].isStrLit? with
| none => throwIllFormedSyntax
| some msg => elabTermEnsuringType stx[2] expectedType? true msg
private def mkSomeContext : Context := {
fileName := "<TermElabM>"
fileMap := arbitrary
}
@[inline] def TermElabM.run {α} (x : TermElabM α) (ctx : Context := mkSomeContext) (s : State := {}) : MetaM (α × State) :=
withConfig setElabConfig (x ctx |>.run s)
@[inline] def TermElabM.run' {α} (x : TermElabM α) (ctx : Context := mkSomeContext) (s : State := {}) : MetaM α :=
(·.1) <$> x.run ctx s
@[inline] def TermElabM.toIO {α} (x : TermElabM α)
(ctxCore : Core.Context) (sCore : Core.State)
(ctxMeta : Meta.Context) (sMeta : Meta.State)
(ctx : Context) (s : State) : IO (α × Core.State × Meta.State × State) := do
let ((a, s), sCore, sMeta) ← (x.run ctx s).toIO ctxCore sCore ctxMeta sMeta
pure (a, sCore, sMeta, s)
instance {α} [MetaEval α] : MetaEval (TermElabM α) where
eval env opts x _ :=
let x : TermElabM α := do
try x finally
let s ← get
s.messages.forM fun msg => do IO.println (← msg.toString)
MetaEval.eval env opts (hideUnit := true) $ x.run' mkSomeContext
unsafe def evalExpr (α) (typeName : Name) (value : Expr) : TermElabM α :=
withoutModifyingEnv do
let name ← mkFreshUserName `_tmp
let type ← inferType value
let type ← whnfD type
unless type.isConstOf typeName do
throwError! "unexpected type at evalExpr{indentExpr type}"
let decl := Declaration.defnDecl {
name := name, levelParams := [], type := type,
value := value, hints := ReducibilityHints.opaque,
safety := DefinitionSafety.unsafe
}
ensureNoUnassignedMVars decl
addAndCompile decl
evalConst α name
end Term
builtin_initialize
registerTraceClass `Elab.postpone
registerTraceClass `Elab.coe
registerTraceClass `Elab.debug
export Term (TermElabM)
end Lean.Elab
|
3713d4eef9489c19f644017cc251076139099c29 | 556aeb81a103e9e0ac4e1fe0ce1bc6e6161c3c5e | /src/starkware/cairo/common/cairo_secp/verification/verification/signature_recover_public_key_compute_doubling_slope_soundness.lean | 9f33ee517616c34196d07c76b50fb26c292be007 | [] | permissive | starkware-libs/formal-proofs | d6b731604461bf99e6ba820e68acca62a21709e8 | f5fa4ba6a471357fd171175183203d0b437f6527 | refs/heads/master | 1,691,085,444,753 | 1,690,507,386,000 | 1,690,507,386,000 | 410,476,629 | 32 | 9 | Apache-2.0 | 1,690,506,773,000 | 1,632,639,790,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,877 | lean | /-
File: signature_recover_public_key_compute_doubling_slope_soundness.lean
Autogenerated file.
-/
import starkware.cairo.lean.semantics.soundness.hoare
import .signature_recover_public_key_code
import ..signature_recover_public_key_spec
import .signature_recover_public_key_verify_zero_soundness
import .signature_recover_public_key_unreduced_sqr_soundness
import .signature_recover_public_key_unreduced_mul_soundness
import .signature_recover_public_key_nondet_bigint3_soundness
open tactic
open starkware.cairo.common.cairo_secp.ec
open starkware.cairo.common.cairo_secp.bigint
open starkware.cairo.common.cairo_secp.field
variables {F : Type} [field F] [decidable_eq F] [prelude_hyps F]
variable mem : F → F
variable σ : register_state F
/- starkware.cairo.common.cairo_secp.ec.compute_doubling_slope autogenerated soundness theorem -/
theorem auto_sound_compute_doubling_slope
-- arguments
(range_check_ptr : F) (point : EcPoint F)
-- code is in memory at σ.pc
(h_mem : mem_at mem code_compute_doubling_slope σ.pc)
-- all dependencies are in memory
(h_mem_4 : mem_at mem code_nondet_bigint3 (σ.pc - 176))
(h_mem_5 : mem_at mem code_unreduced_mul (σ.pc - 164))
(h_mem_6 : mem_at mem code_unreduced_sqr (σ.pc - 144))
(h_mem_7 : mem_at mem code_verify_zero (σ.pc - 128))
-- input arguments on the stack
(hin_range_check_ptr : range_check_ptr = mem (σ.fp - 9))
(hin_point : point = cast_EcPoint mem (σ.fp - 8))
-- conclusion
: ensures_ret mem σ (λ κ τ,
τ.ap = σ.ap + 85 ∧
∃ μ ≤ κ, rc_ensures mem (rc_bound F) μ (mem (σ.fp - 9)) (mem $ τ.ap - 4)
(spec_compute_doubling_slope mem κ range_check_ptr point (mem (τ.ap - 4)) (cast_BigInt3 mem (τ.ap - 3)))) :=
begin
apply ensures_of_ensuresb, intro νbound,
have h_mem_rec := h_mem,
unpack_memory code_compute_doubling_slope at h_mem with ⟨hpc0, hpc1, hpc2, hpc3, hpc4, hpc5, hpc6, hpc7, hpc8, hpc9, hpc10, hpc11, hpc12, hpc13, hpc14, hpc15, hpc16, hpc17, hpc18, hpc19, hpc20, hpc21, hpc22, hpc23, hpc24, hpc25, hpc26, hpc27, hpc28, hpc29, hpc30, hpc31, hpc32, hpc33, hpc34, hpc35, hpc36, hpc37, hpc38, hpc39, hpc40, hpc41, hpc42, hpc43⟩,
-- function call
step_assert_eq hpc0 with arg0,
step_sub hpc1 (auto_sound_nondet_bigint3 mem _ range_check_ptr _ _),
{ rw hpc2, norm_num2, exact h_mem_4 },
{ try { simp only [add_neg_eq_sub, hin_range_check_ptr, hin_point] },
try { dsimp [cast_EcPoint, cast_BigInt3] },
try { arith_simps }, try { simp only [arg0] },
try { arith_simps; try { split }; triv <|> refl <|> simp <|> abel; try { norm_num } }, },
intros κ_call3 ap3 h_call3,
rcases h_call3 with ⟨h_call3_ap_offset, h_call3⟩,
rcases h_call3 with ⟨rc_m3, rc_mle3, hl_range_check_ptr₁, h_call3⟩,
generalize' hr_rev_range_check_ptr₁: mem (ap3 - 4) = range_check_ptr₁,
have htv_range_check_ptr₁ := hr_rev_range_check_ptr₁.symm, clear hr_rev_range_check_ptr₁,
generalize' hr_rev_slope: cast_BigInt3 mem (ap3 - 3) = slope,
simp only [hr_rev_slope] at h_call3,
have htv_slope := hr_rev_slope.symm, clear hr_rev_slope,
try { simp only [arg0] at hl_range_check_ptr₁ },
rw [←htv_range_check_ptr₁, ←hin_range_check_ptr] at hl_range_check_ptr₁,
try { simp only [arg0] at h_call3 },
rw [hin_range_check_ptr] at h_call3,
clear arg0,
-- function call
step_assert_eq hpc3 with arg0,
step_assert_eq hpc4 with arg1,
step_assert_eq hpc5 with arg2,
step_sub hpc6 (auto_sound_unreduced_sqr mem _ point.x _ _),
{ rw hpc7, norm_num2, exact h_mem_6 },
{ try { ext } ; {
try { simp only [add_neg_eq_sub, hin_range_check_ptr, hin_point, htv_range_check_ptr₁, htv_slope] },
try { dsimp [cast_EcPoint, cast_BigInt3] },
try { arith_simps }, try { simp only [arg0, arg1, arg2] },
try { simp only [h_call3_ap_offset] },
try { arith_simps; try { split }; triv <|> refl <|> simp <|> abel; try { norm_num } },}, },
intros κ_call8 ap8 h_call8,
rcases h_call8 with ⟨h_call8_ap_offset, h_call8⟩,
generalize' hr_rev_x_sqr: cast_UnreducedBigInt3 mem (ap8 - 3) = x_sqr,
simp only [hr_rev_x_sqr] at h_call8,
have htv_x_sqr := hr_rev_x_sqr.symm, clear hr_rev_x_sqr,
clear arg0 arg1 arg2,
-- function call
step_assert_eq hpc8 with arg0,
step_assert_eq hpc9 with arg1,
step_assert_eq hpc10 with arg2,
step_assert_eq hpc11 with arg3,
step_assert_eq hpc12 with arg4,
step_assert_eq hpc13 with arg5,
step_sub hpc14 (auto_sound_unreduced_mul mem _ slope point.y _ _ _),
{ rw hpc15, norm_num2, exact h_mem_5 },
{ try { ext } ; {
try { simp only [add_neg_eq_sub, hin_range_check_ptr, hin_point, htv_range_check_ptr₁, htv_slope, htv_x_sqr] },
try { dsimp [cast_EcPoint, cast_BigInt3, cast_UnreducedBigInt3] },
try { arith_simps }, try { simp only [arg0, arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4, arg5] },
try { simp only [h_call3_ap_offset, h_call8_ap_offset] },
try { arith_simps; try { split }; triv <|> refl <|> simp <|> abel; try { norm_num } },}, },
{ try { ext } ; {
try { simp only [add_neg_eq_sub, hin_range_check_ptr, hin_point, htv_range_check_ptr₁, htv_slope, htv_x_sqr] },
try { dsimp [cast_EcPoint, cast_BigInt3, cast_UnreducedBigInt3] },
try { arith_simps }, try { simp only [arg0, arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4, arg5] },
try { simp only [h_call3_ap_offset, h_call8_ap_offset] },
try { arith_simps; try { split }; triv <|> refl <|> simp <|> abel; try { norm_num } },}, },
intros κ_call16 ap16 h_call16,
rcases h_call16 with ⟨h_call16_ap_offset, h_call16⟩,
generalize' hr_rev_slope_y: cast_UnreducedBigInt3 mem (ap16 - 3) = slope_y,
simp only [hr_rev_slope_y] at h_call16,
have htv_slope_y := hr_rev_slope_y.symm, clear hr_rev_slope_y,
clear arg0 arg1 arg2 arg3 arg4 arg5,
-- function call
step_assert_eq hpc16 hpc17 with arg0,
step_assert_eq hpc18 with arg1,
step_assert_eq hpc19 hpc20 with arg2,
step_assert_eq hpc21 with arg3,
step_assert_eq hpc22 hpc23 with arg4,
step_assert_eq hpc24 with arg5,
step_assert_eq hpc25 hpc26 with arg6,
step_assert_eq hpc27 with arg7,
step_assert_eq hpc28 hpc29 with arg8,
step_assert_eq hpc30 with arg9,
step_assert_eq hpc31 hpc32 with arg10,
step_assert_eq hpc33 with arg11,
step_assert_eq hpc34 with arg12,
step_assert_eq hpc35 with arg13,
step_assert_eq hpc36 with arg14,
step_assert_eq hpc37 with arg15,
step_sub hpc38 (auto_sound_verify_zero mem _ range_check_ptr₁ {
d0 := 3 * x_sqr.d0 - 2 * slope_y.d0,
d1 := 3 * x_sqr.d1 - 2 * slope_y.d1,
d2 := 3 * x_sqr.d2 - 2 * slope_y.d2
} _ _ _),
{ rw hpc39, norm_num2, exact h_mem_7 },
{ try { simp only [add_neg_eq_sub, hin_range_check_ptr, hin_point, htv_range_check_ptr₁, htv_slope, htv_x_sqr, htv_slope_y] },
try { dsimp [cast_EcPoint, cast_BigInt3, cast_UnreducedBigInt3] },
try { arith_simps }, try { simp only [arg0, arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4, arg5, arg6, arg7, arg8, arg9, arg10, arg11, arg12, (eq_sub_of_eq_add arg13), (eq_sub_of_eq_add arg14), (eq_sub_of_eq_add arg15)] },
try { simp only [h_call3_ap_offset, h_call8_ap_offset, h_call16_ap_offset] },
try { arith_simps; try { split }; triv <|> refl <|> simp <|> abel; try { norm_num } }, },
{ try { ext } ; {
try { simp only [add_neg_eq_sub, hin_range_check_ptr, hin_point, htv_range_check_ptr₁, htv_slope, htv_x_sqr, htv_slope_y] },
try { dsimp [cast_EcPoint, cast_BigInt3, cast_UnreducedBigInt3] },
try { arith_simps }, try { simp only [arg0, arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4, arg5, arg6, arg7, arg8, arg9, arg10, arg11, arg12, (eq_sub_of_eq_add arg13), (eq_sub_of_eq_add arg14), (eq_sub_of_eq_add arg15)] },
try { simp only [h_call3_ap_offset, h_call8_ap_offset, h_call16_ap_offset] },
try { arith_simps; try { split }; triv <|> refl <|> simp <|> abel; try { norm_num } },}, },
intros κ_call40 ap40 h_call40,
rcases h_call40 with ⟨h_call40_ap_offset, h_call40⟩,
rcases h_call40 with ⟨rc_m40, rc_mle40, hl_range_check_ptr₂, h_call40⟩,
generalize' hr_rev_range_check_ptr₂: mem (ap40 - 1) = range_check_ptr₂,
have htv_range_check_ptr₂ := hr_rev_range_check_ptr₂.symm, clear hr_rev_range_check_ptr₂,
try { simp only [arg0 ,arg1 ,arg2 ,arg3 ,arg4 ,arg5 ,arg6 ,arg7 ,arg8 ,arg9 ,arg10 ,arg11 ,arg12 ,arg13 ,arg14 ,arg15] at hl_range_check_ptr₂ },
try { rw [h_call16_ap_offset, h_call8_ap_offset] at hl_range_check_ptr₂ }, try { arith_simps at hl_range_check_ptr₂ },
rw [←htv_range_check_ptr₂, ←htv_range_check_ptr₁] at hl_range_check_ptr₂,
try { simp only [arg0 ,arg1 ,arg2 ,arg3 ,arg4 ,arg5 ,arg6 ,arg7 ,arg8 ,arg9 ,arg10 ,arg11 ,arg12 ,arg13 ,arg14 ,arg15] at h_call40 },
try { rw [h_call16_ap_offset, h_call8_ap_offset] at h_call40 }, try { arith_simps at h_call40 },
rw [←htv_range_check_ptr₁, hl_range_check_ptr₁, hin_range_check_ptr] at h_call40,
clear arg0 arg1 arg2 arg3 arg4 arg5 arg6 arg7 arg8 arg9 arg10 arg11 arg12 arg13 arg14 arg15,
-- return
step_assert_eq hpc40 with hret0,
step_assert_eq hpc41 with hret1,
step_assert_eq hpc42 with hret2,
step_ret hpc43,
-- finish
step_done, use_only [rfl, rfl],
split,
{ try { simp only [h_call3_ap_offset ,h_call8_ap_offset ,h_call16_ap_offset ,h_call40_ap_offset] },
try { arith_simps }, try { refl } },
-- range check condition
use_only (rc_m3+rc_m40+0+0), split,
linarith [rc_mle3, rc_mle40],
split,
{ arith_simps, try { simp only [hret0 ,hret1 ,hret2] },
rw [←htv_range_check_ptr₂, hl_range_check_ptr₂, hl_range_check_ptr₁, hin_range_check_ptr],
try { arith_simps, refl <|> norm_cast }, try { refl } },
intro rc_h_range_check_ptr, repeat { rw [add_assoc] at rc_h_range_check_ptr },
have rc_h_range_check_ptr' := range_checked_add_right rc_h_range_check_ptr,
-- Final Proof
-- user-provided reduction
suffices auto_spec: auto_spec_compute_doubling_slope mem _ range_check_ptr point _ _,
{ apply sound_compute_doubling_slope, apply auto_spec },
-- prove the auto generated assertion
dsimp [auto_spec_compute_doubling_slope],
try { norm_num1 }, try { arith_simps },
use_only [κ_call3],
use_only [range_check_ptr₁],
use_only [slope],
have rc_h_range_check_ptr₁ := range_checked_offset' rc_h_range_check_ptr,
have rc_h_range_check_ptr₁' := range_checked_add_right rc_h_range_check_ptr₁, try { norm_cast at rc_h_range_check_ptr₁' },
have spec3 := h_call3 rc_h_range_check_ptr',
rw [←hin_range_check_ptr, ←htv_range_check_ptr₁] at spec3,
try { dsimp at spec3, arith_simps at spec3 },
use_only [spec3],
use_only [κ_call8],
use_only [x_sqr],
try { dsimp at h_call8, arith_simps at h_call8 },
try { use_only [h_call8] },
use_only [κ_call16],
use_only [slope_y],
try { dsimp at h_call16, arith_simps at h_call16 },
try { use_only [h_call16] },
use_only [κ_call40],
use_only [range_check_ptr₂],
have rc_h_range_check_ptr₂ := range_checked_offset' rc_h_range_check_ptr₁,
have rc_h_range_check_ptr₂' := range_checked_add_right rc_h_range_check_ptr₂, try { norm_cast at rc_h_range_check_ptr₂' },
have spec40 := h_call40 rc_h_range_check_ptr₁',
rw [←hin_range_check_ptr, ←hl_range_check_ptr₁, ←htv_range_check_ptr₂] at spec40,
try { dsimp at spec40, arith_simps at spec40 },
use_only [spec40],
try { split, linarith },
try { ensures_simps; try { simp only [add_neg_eq_sub, hin_range_check_ptr, hin_point, htv_range_check_ptr₁, htv_slope, htv_x_sqr, htv_slope_y, htv_range_check_ptr₂] }, },
try { dsimp [cast_EcPoint, cast_BigInt3, cast_UnreducedBigInt3] },
try { arith_simps }, try { simp only [hret0, hret1, hret2] },
try { simp only [h_call3_ap_offset, h_call8_ap_offset, h_call16_ap_offset, h_call40_ap_offset] },
try { arith_simps; try { split }; triv <|> refl <|> simp <|> abel; try { norm_num } },
end
|
b58da8b2c9832010afc8e6ef86bae3e29cfb12f2 | 624f6f2ae8b3b1adc5f8f67a365c51d5126be45a | /tests/lean/run/reduce3.lean | 5e5bb21cff716dea7e8eb09d7853a5c7b1790229 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mhuisi/lean4 | 28d35a4febc2e251c7f05492e13f3b05d6f9b7af | dda44bc47f3e5d024508060dac2bcb59fd12e4c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,621,225,489,283 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 1,585,142,689,000 | 250,590,438 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,602,443,220,000 | 1,585,327,814,000 | C | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 781 | lean | def fact : Nat → Nat
| 0 => 1
| (n+1) => (n+1)*fact n
#check fact 6
#eval fact 10
new_frontend
-- set_option pp.all true
theorem tst1 : 100000000000 + 200000000000 = 300000000000 :=
rfl
theorem tst2 : 100000000000 * 200000000000 = 20000000000000000000000 :=
rfl
theorem tst3 : fact 7 = 5040 :=
rfl
theorem tst4 : fact 10 = 3628800 :=
rfl
theorem tst5 : 100000000001 < 300000000000 :=
ofDecideEqTrue rfl
theorem tst6 : "hello".length = 5 :=
rfl
theorem tst7 : "helloworld".length = 10 :=
rfl
theorem tst8 : "hello" ++ "world" = "helloworld" :=
rfl
theorem tst9 : "abc" ≠ "cde" :=
decide! _
theorem tst10 : "helloWorld" ≠ "helloworld" :=
decide! _
theorem tst11 : "helloWorld" = "helloWorld" :=
decide! _
theorem tst12 : 'a' ≠ 'c' :=
decide! _
#check tst10
|
44571e28a8407224712ad4edec7885170cc0f092 | 88892181780ff536a81e794003fe058062f06758 | /src/100_theorems/t069.lean | 8b43daec7ec4cedc11f13a83fd2aac498a79fe69 | [] | no_license | AtnNn/lean-sandbox | fe2c44280444e8bb8146ab8ac391c82b480c0a2e | 8c68afbdc09213173aef1be195da7a9a86060a97 | refs/heads/master | 1,623,004,395,876 | 1,579,969,507,000 | 1,579,969,507,000 | 146,666,368 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 388 | lean | import algebra.euclidean_domain
-- Greatest Common Divisor Algorithm
universe u
open euclidean_domain
#check dvd_gcd
theorem t069 {α : Type u} [euclidean_domain α] [decidable_eq α] (a b : α) :
∃ c, c ∣ a ∧ c ∣ b ∧ (∀ x : α, x ∣ a → x ∣ b → x ∣ c)
:= begin
use gcd a b,
rw ← and_assoc,
split,
{ exact gcd_dvd a b },
{ intro, exact dvd_gcd }
end
|
74d04a67b1e99d423bdd809baa20ccb8b145ec67 | cbb817439c51008d66b37ce6b1964fea61434d35 | /theorem-proving-in-lean/src/chap_7.lean | 31d40afa3b9502a02717bbf5a5784b4573f88c3d | [] | no_license | tomhoule/theorem-proving-in-lean-exercises | a07f99d4f6b41ce003e8a0274c7bc46359fa62b2 | 60ccc71b8a6df6924e7cc90aab713b804f78da9f | refs/heads/master | 1,663,582,321,828 | 1,590,352,467,000 | 1,590,352,476,000 | 257,107,936 | 3 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 21,266 | lean |
-- Working through section 7.1
namespace hidden
inductive bool : Type
| ff : bool
| tt : bool
def band (b1 b2 : bool) : bool :=
bool.rec_on b1 bool.ff b2
theorem t_and_f_is_f : band bool.tt bool.ff = bool.ff := rfl
theorem f_and_t_is_f : band bool.ff bool.tt = bool.ff := rfl
theorem f_and_f_is_f : band bool.ff bool.ff = bool.ff := rfl
theorem t_and_t_is_t : band bool.tt bool.tt = bool.tt := rfl
def bor (b1 b2 : bool) : bool :=
bool.rec_on b1 b2 bool.tt
theorem t_or_t_is_t : bor bool.tt bool.tt = bool.tt := rfl
theorem t_or_f_is_t : bor bool.tt bool.ff = bool.tt := rfl
theorem f_or_t_is_t : bor bool.ff bool.tt = bool.tt := rfl
theorem f_or_f_is_f : bor bool.ff bool.ff = bool.ff := rfl
def bnot (b : bool) : bool :=
bool.rec_on b bool.tt bool.ff
theorem not_t_is_f : bnot bool.tt = bool.ff := rfl
theorem not_f_is_t : bnot bool.ff = bool.tt := rfl
end hidden
-- Going through section 7.2
--
-- > As exercises, we encourage you to develop a notion of composition for partial functions from α
-- > to β and β to γ, and show that it behaves as expected. We also encourage you to show that bool
-- > and nat are inhabited, that the product of two inhabited types is inhabited, and that the type
-- > of functions to an inhabited type is inhabited.
namespace chap7_section2
variables { α β γ : Type }
variables (a : α) (b : β) (c : γ)
def and_then (f1 : α → option β) (f2 : β → option γ ) (a : α): option γ :=
have option β, from f1 a,
show option γ, from option.rec_on this none (λ b, f2 b)
def return_none (α β : Type) : α → option β := λ _, none
def return_some (α β : Type) : β → α → option β := λ b a, some b
theorem none_none_none : and_then (return_none α β) (return_none β γ) a = none := rfl
theorem none_some_none : and_then (return_none α β) (return_some β γ c) a = none := rfl
theorem some_none_none : and_then (return_some α β b) (return_none β γ) a = none := rfl
theorem some_some_some : and_then (return_some α β b) (return_some β γ c) a = some c := rfl
theorem bool_inhabited : inhabited bool := inhabited.mk tt
theorem nat_inhabited : inhabited ℕ := inhabited.mk 0
theorem product_of_inhabited_is_inhabited : inhabited α → inhabited β → inhabited (α × β) :=
λ alpha beta, inhabited.mk $ prod.mk alpha.default beta.default
theorem type_of_functions_to_inhabited_type_is_inhabited : inhabited β → inhabited (α → β) :=
λ hib, inhabited.mk $ λ a, hib.default
end chap7_section2
namespace ch7_section5
universe u
variables { α : Type }
open list
theorem append_nil (t : list α) : t ++ nil = t :=
list.rec_on
t
(show nil ++ nil = nil, from nil_append (@nil α))
(λ (hd: α) (tl: list α) (acc : tl ++ nil = tl),
have e1 : hd::tl ++ nil = hd::(tl ++ nil), from cons_append hd tl nil,
have e2 : hd::(tl ++ nil) = hd::tl, by rw [acc],
show hd::tl ++ nil = hd::tl, by rw [e1, e2])
theorem append_assoc (r s t : list α) :
r ++ s ++ t = r ++ (s ++ t) :=
list.rec_on
r
(show nil ++ s ++ t = nil ++ (s ++ t), by rw [nil_append, nil_append])
(λ (hd : α) (tl : list α) (acc : tl ++ s ++ t = tl ++ (s ++ t)),
calc
((hd::tl) ++ s) ++ t = hd::((tl ++ s) ++ t) : cons_append hd (tl ++ s) t
... = hd::(tl ++ (s ++ t)) : by rw [acc]
... = (hd::tl) ++ (s ++ t) : by rw [cons_append hd (tl)] )
-- > Try also defining the function length : Π {α : Type u}, list α → nat that returns the
-- > length of a list, and prove that it behaves as expected (for example, length (s ++ t) =
-- > length s + length t).
def length : list α → ℕ := λ xs, list.rec 0 (λ item list acc, acc + 1) xs
theorem length_of_nil_is_zero : length (@nil α) = 0 := by refl
theorem append_length (l1 l2 : list α) : length (l1 ++ l2) = length l1 + length l2 :=
list.rec_on
l1
(
have f1 : length (nil ++ l2) = length l2, by rw [nil_append],
have f2 : length (@nil α) + length l2 = length l2, by rw [length_of_nil_is_zero, zero_add],
show length (nil ++ l2) = length nil + length l2, by rw [f1, f2]
)
(λ (hd : α) (tl : list α) (acc : length (tl ++ l2) = length tl + length l2),
have length (hd::tl) = length tl + 1, by refl,
eq.symm $
calc
length (hd::tl) + length l2 = length tl + length l2 + 1 : by rw [this, add_assoc, add_comm 1, add_assoc]
... = length (tl ++ l2) + 1 : by rw [acc]
... = length (hd::tl ++ l2) : by refl
)
theorem cons_increases_len_by_1 (a : α) (l : list α) : length (list.cons a l) = length l + 1 := by refl
end ch7_section5
section ch7_section7
universe u
theorem mysymm {α : Type u} {a b : α} (h : eq a b) : eq b a :=
eq.subst h (eq.refl a)
theorem mytrans {α : Type u} {a b c : α}
(h₁ : eq a b) (h₂ : eq b c) : eq a c :=
eq.rec_on h₂ h₁
theorem mycongr {α β : Type u} {a b : α} (f : α → β)
(h : eq a b) : eq (f a) (f b) :=
eq.rec_on h rfl
end ch7_section7
namespace ch7ex1
def mul (m n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
nat.rec_on
n
nat.zero
(λ n product, product + m)
def predecessor (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
nat.rec_on
n
nat.zero
(λ n n_pred,
cond (nat.succ n = 1) nat.zero (nat.succ n_pred)
)
def trunc_sub (m n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
nat.rec_on
n
m
(λ _ running, predecessor running)
def pow (m n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
nat.rec_on
n
1
(λ exp running, mul running m)
theorem n_gt_n_is_absurd (n : ℕ) (n_gt_n : n > n) : false := gt_irrefl n $ n_gt_n
namespace hidden
theorem predecessor_succ_n_eq_n (n : ℕ) : predecessor (nat.succ n) = n :=
nat.rec_on n
(show predecessor (nat.succ nat.zero) = nat.zero, from rfl)
(λ n1 eqs, show predecessor (nat.succ (nat.succ n1)) = nat.succ n1, from eq.symm $
calc
nat.succ n1 = nat.succ (predecessor (nat.succ n1)) : by rw eqs
... = predecessor (nat.succ (nat.succ n1)) : by refl
)
theorem mul_zero (n : ℕ) : mul n 0 = 0 := rfl
theorem zero_mul (n : ℕ) : mul 0 n = 0 :=
nat.rec_on n
rfl
(λ n1 eqs,
calc
mul 0 (nat.succ n1) = mul 0 n1 : rfl
... = 0 : by rw eqs)
theorem two_times_two : mul 2 2 = 4 := rfl
theorem two_times_three : mul 2 3 = 6 := rfl
theorem one_mul (n : ℕ) : mul 1 n = n :=
nat.rec_on
n
(show mul 1 0 = 0, from rfl)
(λ n eqs,
calc
mul 1 (nat.succ n) = nat.succ (mul 1 n) : rfl
... = nat.succ n : by rw eqs
)
theorem mul_one (n : ℕ) : mul n 1 = n :=
nat.rec_on n rfl
(
λ n eqs,
calc
mul (nat.succ n) 1 = nat.succ (mul n 1) : rfl
... = nat.succ n : by rw eqs
)
theorem succ_add_eq_add_succ (m n : ℕ) : nat.succ m + n = m + nat.succ n :=
nat.rec_on n
(show nat.succ m + nat.zero = nat.succ m, by rw add_zero)
(
assume n (hi : nat.succ m + n = m + nat.succ n),
calc
nat.succ m + nat.succ n = m + 1 + nat.succ n : rfl
... = m + (1 + nat.succ n) : by rw add_assoc
... = m + (nat.succ $ nat.succ n) : by rw [add_comm 1]
... = m + nat.succ (nat.succ n) : rfl
)
theorem mul_add_once (m n : ℕ) : mul m n + n = mul (nat.succ m) n :=
nat.rec_on n
(show mul m 0 + 0 = mul (nat.succ m) 0, from rfl)
(assume n (hi : mul m n + n = mul (nat.succ m) n),
-- eq.symm $
calc
mul m (nat.succ n) + (nat.succ n) = mul m n + m + (nat.succ n) : rfl
... = mul m n + (m + nat.succ n) : by rw [add_assoc]
... = mul m n + (nat.succ m + n) : by rw succ_add_eq_add_succ
... = mul m n + n + nat.succ m : by rw [add_comm (nat.succ m) n, add_assoc]
... = mul (nat.succ m) n + nat.succ m : by rw hi
... = mul (nat.succ m) (nat.succ n) : by refl
)
theorem mul_comm (m n : ℕ) : mul m n = mul n m :=
nat.rec_on n
(show mul m 0 = mul 0 m, by rw [mul_zero, zero_mul])
(λ n eqs,
show mul m (nat.succ n) = mul (nat.succ n) m, from calc
mul m (nat.succ n) = mul m n + m : rfl
... = (mul n m) + m : by rw eqs
... = mul (nat.succ n) m : by rw mul_add_once
)
theorem mul_distrib (l m n : ℕ) : mul l (m + n) = mul l m + mul l n :=
nat.rec_on n
(show mul l (m + 0) = mul l m + mul l 0, by repeat { rw add_zero <|> rw mul_zero })
(assume n (hi : mul l (m + n) = mul l m + mul l n),
calc
mul l (m + nat.succ n) = mul l (nat.succ (m + n)) : rfl
... = mul l (m + n) + l : rfl
... = (mul l m + mul l n) + l : by rw hi
... = mul l m + (mul l n + l) : by rw add_assoc
... = mul l m + mul l (nat.succ n) : rfl
)
theorem mul_assoc (l m n : ℕ) : mul l (mul m n) = mul (mul l m) n :=
nat.rec_on n
(show mul l (mul m 0) = mul (mul l m) 0, by { repeat { rw mul_zero <|> rw zero_mul } })
(assume n (hi : mul l (mul m n) = mul (mul l m) n),
calc
mul l (mul m (nat.succ n)) = mul l ((mul m n) + m) : rfl
... = mul l (mul m n) + mul l m : by rw mul_distrib
... = mul (mul l m) n + mul l m : by rw hi
... = mul (mul l m) (nat.succ n) : rfl
)
theorem predecessor_of_zero_is_zero : predecessor 0 = 0 := rfl
theorem predecessor_of_one_is_zero : predecessor 1 = 0 := rfl
theorem predecessor_of_two_is_one : predecessor 2 = 1 := rfl
theorem predecessor_of_thirty_seven_is_thirty_six : predecessor 37 = 36 := rfl
theorem zero_minus_zero_is_zero : trunc_sub 0 0 = 0 := rfl
theorem n_minus_zero_is_n (n : ℕ) : trunc_sub n 0 = n := rfl
theorem thirty_seven_minus_one_is_thirty_six : trunc_sub 37 1 = 36 := rfl
theorem thirty_seven_minus_twelve_is_twenty_five : trunc_sub 37 12 = 25 := rfl
theorem pow_2_2_is_4 : pow 2 2 = 4 := rfl
theorem pow_6_2_is_36 : pow 6 2 = 36 := rfl
theorem pow_0_1_is_0 : pow 0 1 = 0 := rfl
theorem pow_n_zero_is_1 (n : ℕ) : pow n 0 = 1 := rfl
theorem pow_5_3_is_125 : pow 5 3 = 125 := rfl
theorem pow_n_1_is_n (n : ℕ) : (pow n 1) = n :=
nat.rec_on n
(show pow nat.zero 1 = 0, from rfl)
(λ m m_pow_1_eq_m,
calc
pow (nat.succ m) 1 = mul (pow (nat.succ m) 0) (nat.succ m) : rfl
... = mul 1 (nat.succ m) : rfl
... = mul (nat.succ m) 1 : by rw mul_comm
... = nat.succ m : by rw mul_one
)
theorem pow_addition_identity (b m n : ℕ) : pow b (m + n) = mul (pow b m) (pow b n) :=
nat.rec_on n
(show pow b (m + 0) = mul (pow b m) (pow b 0), by rw [add_zero, pow_n_zero_is_1, mul_one])
(assume n (hi : pow b (m + n) = mul (pow b m) (pow b n)),
calc
pow b (m + nat.succ n) = pow b (nat.succ (m + n)) : rfl
... = mul (pow b (m + n)) b : rfl
... = mul (mul (pow b m) (pow b n)) b : by rw hi
... = mul (pow b m) (mul (pow b n) b) : by rw [mul_assoc]
... = mul (pow b m) (pow b (nat.succ n)) : rfl
)
example (b m n : ℕ) : pow (pow b m) n = pow b (mul m n) :=
nat.rec_on n
(show pow (pow b m) 0 = pow b (mul m 0), by repeat { rw mul_zero <|> rw pow_n_zero_is_1 })
(assume n (hi : pow (pow b m) n = pow b (mul m n)),
calc
pow (pow b m) (nat.succ n) = mul (pow (pow b m) n) (pow b m) : rfl
... = mul (pow b (mul m n)) (pow b m) : by rw hi
... = pow b (mul m n + m) : by rw pow_addition_identity
... = pow b (mul m (nat.succ n)) : rfl
)
example (b c n : ℕ) : pow (mul b c) n = mul (pow b n) (pow c n) :=
nat.rec_on n
(show pow (mul b c) 0 = mul (pow b 0) (pow c 0), by { rw [pow_n_zero_is_1, pow_n_zero_is_1, pow_n_zero_is_1], refl })
(assume n (hi : pow (mul b c) n = mul (pow b n) (pow c n)),
calc
pow (mul b c) (nat.succ n) = mul (pow (mul b c) n) (mul b c) : rfl
... = mul (mul (pow b n) (pow c n)) (mul b c) : by rw hi
... = mul (mul (mul (pow c n) (pow b n)) b) c : by rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm (pow b n)]
... = mul (mul (pow c n) (mul (pow b n) b)) c : by rw [mul_assoc]
... = mul (mul (pow c n) (pow b (nat.succ n))) c : rfl
... = mul (mul (pow b (nat.succ n)) (pow c n)) c : by rw [mul_comm (pow b (nat.succ n))]
... = mul (pow b (nat.succ n)) (mul (pow c n) c) : by rw mul_assoc
... = mul (pow b (nat.succ n)) (pow c (nat.succ n)) : rfl
)
end hidden
end ch7ex1
namespace ch7ex2
open ch7_section5
variables { α : Type }
def reverse (xs : list α) : list α :=
list.rec_on xs
list.nil
(assume x (xs: list α) (hi : list α), list.append hi (list.cons x list.nil))
theorem nil_append (xs : list α) : list.nil ++ xs = xs := rfl
theorem reverse_nil : reverse (@list.nil α) = @list.nil α := rfl
theorem reverse_append (xs ys : list α) : reverse (xs ++ ys) = reverse ys ++ reverse xs :=
list.rec_on xs
(show reverse (list.nil ++ ys) = reverse ys ++ list.nil, by rw [nil_append, append_nil])
(assume hd (tl : list α) (hi : reverse (tl ++ ys) = reverse ys ++ reverse tl),
calc
reverse ((hd::tl) ++ ys) = reverse (hd::(tl ++ ys)) : rfl
... = reverse (tl ++ ys) ++ (hd::list.nil) : rfl
... = (reverse ys ++ reverse tl) ++ (hd::list.nil) : by rw hi
... = reverse ys ++ (reverse tl ++ (hd::list.nil)) : by rw append_assoc
... = reverse ys ++ reverse (hd::tl) : rfl
)
theorem basic_append (a b c d : α) :
reverse (list.cons a (list.cons b (list.cons c (list.cons d list.nil)))) = list.cons d (list.cons c (list.cons b (list.cons a list.nil))) :=
rfl
theorem reverse_preserves_length (xs : list α) : length (reverse xs) = length xs :=
list.rec_on xs
(show length (reverse list.nil) = length list.nil, by rw reverse_nil)
(assume hd (tl : list α) (hi : length (reverse tl) = length tl),
calc
length (reverse $ hd::tl) = length ((reverse tl) ++ (hd::list.nil)) : rfl
... = length (reverse tl) + length (hd::list.nil) : by rw append_length
... = length tl + 1 : by { rw hi, refl }
... = length (hd::tl) : rfl
)
theorem reverse_twice_is_id (xs : list α) : reverse (reverse xs) = xs :=
list.rec_on xs
(show reverse (reverse list.nil) = list.nil, from rfl)
(assume hd (xs : list α) (hi : reverse (reverse xs) = xs),
calc
reverse (reverse $ hd::xs) = reverse ((reverse xs) ++ (hd::list.nil)) : rfl
... = reverse (hd::list.nil) ++ (reverse $ reverse xs) : by rw reverse_append
... = hd::(reverse $ reverse xs) : rfl
... = hd::xs : by rw hi
-- show reverse (reverse $ hd::xs) = hd::xs, from sorry
)
end ch7ex2
namespace ch7ex3
inductive Expr : Type
| const (n : ℕ) : Expr
| var (n : ℕ) : Expr
| plus (s t : Expr) : Expr
| times (s t : Expr) : Expr
def eval (vars : list ℕ) (expr : Expr) : option ℕ :=
Expr.rec_on expr
(λ hn, hn)
(λ idx, vars.nth idx)
(λ hs ht hseval hteval,
have product : option (ℕ × ℕ), from option.bind hseval (λ ha, option.map (λ hb, ⟨ha, hb⟩) hteval ),
option.map (λ (h : ℕ × ℕ), h.1 + h.2) product
)
(λ hs ht hseval hteval,
have product : option (ℕ × ℕ), from option.bind hseval (λ ha, option.map (λ hb, (ha, hb)) hteval),
option.map (λ (h : ℕ × ℕ), h.1 * h.2) product
)
theorem const_2_is_2 : eval [] (Expr.const 2) = option.some 2 := rfl
theorem simple_var_assignment : eval [5] (Expr.var 0) = option.some 5 := rfl
theorem missing_vars_fail_evaluation : eval [5, 8] (Expr.var 4) = option.none := rfl
theorem addition_with_variable : eval [12] (Expr.plus (Expr.const 2) (Expr.var 0)) = some 14 := rfl
theorem addition_and_multiplication_with_variables : eval [4, 10] (Expr.times (Expr.var 1) (Expr.plus (Expr.const 5) (Expr.var 0))) = some 90 := rfl
end ch7ex3
namespace ch7ex4
inductive Proposition : Type
| false : Proposition
| var (n : ℕ) : Proposition
| not (p : Proposition) : Proposition
| and (p q : Proposition) : Proposition
| or (p q : Proposition) : Proposition
def eval (vars : list bool) (formula : Proposition) : option bool :=
begin
induction formula,
case Proposition.false
{ exact bool.ff },
case Proposition.var : n
{ exact vars.nth n },
case Proposition.not
{ exact option.map (λ h, bool.rec_on h bool.tt bool.ff) formula_ih },
case Proposition.and
{
have : option (bool × bool), from option.bind formula_ih_p (λ hp, option.map (λ hq, (hp, hq)) formula_ih_q),
exact option.map (λ (hpq : bool × bool), bool.rec_on hpq.1 bool.ff hpq.2) this
},
case Proposition.or
{
have : option (bool × bool), from option.bind formula_ih_p (λ hp, option.map (λ hq, (hp, hq)) formula_ih_q),
exact option.map (λ (hpq : bool × bool), bool.rec_on hpq.1 hpq.2 bool.tt) this
},
end
def complexity (formula : Proposition) : ℕ :=
begin
induction formula,
case Proposition.false
{ exact 1 },
case Proposition.var
{ exact 1 },
case Proposition.not
{ exact 1 + formula_ih },
case Proposition.and : p q
{ exact formula_ih_p + formula_ih_q + 1 },
case Proposition.or : p q
{ exact formula_ih_p + formula_ih_q + 1 },
end
def substitute (varnum : ℕ) (formula subst : Proposition) : Proposition :=
begin
induction formula,
case Proposition.false
{ exact Proposition.false },
case Proposition.var : n
{ exact cond (varnum = n) subst (Proposition.var n) },
case Proposition.not : p
{ exact Proposition.not formula_ih },
case Proposition.and : p q
{ exact Proposition.and formula_ih_p formula_ih_q },
case Proposition.or : p q
{ exact Proposition.or formula_ih_p formula_ih_q },
end
lemma substitute_works : substitute 1 (Proposition.or (Proposition.false) (Proposition.var 1)) (Proposition.not Proposition.false) = Proposition.or Proposition.false (Proposition.not Proposition.false) := rfl
end ch7ex4
namespace ch7ex5
inductive even : ℕ → bool → Prop
| zero : even 0 tt
| even_succ : ∀ (n : ℕ), even n ff → even (n + 1) tt
| odd_succ : ∀ (n : ℕ), even n tt → even (n + 1) ff
lemma zero_is_even : even 0 tt := even.zero
lemma one_is_odd : even 1 ff := even.odd_succ 0 even.zero
lemma two_is_even : even 2 tt := even.even_succ 1 one_is_odd
lemma three_is_odd : even 3 ff := even.odd_succ 2 two_is_even
end ch7ex5
|
e61bde857fcf1f11c96da391c6ce44519a2e3f67 | f083c4ed5d443659f3ed9b43b1ca5bb037ddeb58 | /data/multiset.lean | 1df36218cc6566331e03abc35d54a7a956da77cf | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | semorrison/mathlib | 1be6f11086e0d24180fec4b9696d3ec58b439d10 | 20b4143976dad48e664c4847b75a85237dca0a89 | refs/heads/master | 1,583,799,212,170 | 1,535,634,130,000 | 1,535,730,505,000 | 129,076,205 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,551,697,998,000 | 1,523,442,265,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 119,508 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Mario Carneiro
Multisets.
-/
import logic.function order.boolean_algebra
data.list.basic data.list.perm data.list.sort data.quot data.string
algebra.order_functions algebra.group_power algebra.ordered_group
category.traversable.lemmas tactic.interactive
category.traversable.instances category.basic
open list subtype nat lattice
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
local infix ` • ` := add_monoid.smul
instance list.perm.setoid (α : Type*) : setoid (list α) :=
setoid.mk perm ⟨perm.refl, @perm.symm _, @perm.trans _⟩
/-- `multiset α` is the quotient of `list α` by list permutation. The result
is a type of finite sets with duplicates allowed. -/
def {u} multiset (α : Type u) : Type u :=
quotient (list.perm.setoid α)
namespace multiset
instance : has_coe (list α) (multiset α) := ⟨quot.mk _⟩
@[simp] theorem quot_mk_to_coe (l : list α) : @eq (multiset α) ⟦l⟧ l := rfl
@[simp] theorem quot_mk_to_coe' (l : list α) : @eq (multiset α) (quot.mk (≈) l) l := rfl
@[simp] theorem quot_mk_to_coe'' (l : list α) : @eq (multiset α) (quot.mk setoid.r l) l := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_eq_coe {l₁ l₂ : list α} : (l₁ : multiset α) = l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ := quotient.eq
instance has_decidable_eq [decidable_eq α] : decidable_eq (multiset α)
| s₁ s₂ := quotient.rec_on_subsingleton₂ s₁ s₂ $ λ l₁ l₂,
decidable_of_iff' _ quotient.eq
/- empty multiset -/
/-- `0 : multiset α` is the empty set -/
protected def zero : multiset α := @nil α
instance : has_zero (multiset α) := ⟨multiset.zero⟩
instance : has_emptyc (multiset α) := ⟨0⟩
instance : inhabited (multiset α) := ⟨0⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_nil_eq_zero : (@nil α : multiset α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem empty_eq_zero : (∅ : multiset α) = 0 := rfl
/- cons -/
/-- `cons a s` is the multiset which contains `s` plus one more
instance of `a`. -/
def cons (a : α) (s : multiset α) : multiset α :=
quot.lift_on s (λ l, (a :: l : multiset α))
(λ l₁ l₂ p, quot.sound ((perm_cons a).2 p))
notation a :: b := cons a b
instance : has_insert α (multiset α) := ⟨cons⟩
@[simp] theorem insert_eq_cons (a : α) (s : multiset α) :
insert a s = a::s := rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_coe (a : α) (l : list α) :
(a::l : multiset α) = (a::l : list α) := rfl
theorem singleton_coe (a : α) : (a::0 : multiset α) = ([a] : list α) := rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_inj_left {a b : α} (s : multiset α) :
a::s = b::s ↔ a = b :=
⟨quot.induction_on s $ λ l e,
have [a] ++ l ~ [b] ++ l, from quotient.exact e,
eq_singleton_of_perm $ (perm_app_right_iff _).1 this, congr_arg _⟩
@[simp] theorem cons_inj_right (a : α) {s t : multiset α} :
a::s = a::t ↔ s = t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, by simp [perm_cons]
@[recursor 5] protected theorem induction {p : multiset α → Prop}
(h₁ : p 0) (h₂ : ∀ ⦃a : α⦄ {s : multiset α}, p s → p (a :: s)) (s) : p s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, by induction l with _ _ ih; [exact h₁, exact h₂ ih]
@[elab_as_eliminator] protected theorem induction_on {p : multiset α → Prop}
(s : multiset α) (h₁ : p 0) (h₂ : ∀ ⦃a : α⦄ {s : multiset α}, p s → p (a :: s)) : p s :=
multiset.induction h₁ h₂ s
theorem cons_swap (a b : α) (s : multiset α) : a :: b :: s = b :: a :: s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, quotient.sound $ perm.swap _ _ _
section rec
variables {C : multiset α → Sort*}
/-- Dependent recursor on multisets.
TODO: should be @[recursor 6], but then the definition of `multiset.pi` failes with a stack
overflow in `whnf`.
-/
protected def rec
(C_0 : C 0)
(C_cons : Πa m, C m → C (a::m))
(C_cons_heq : ∀a a' m b, C_cons a (a'::m) (C_cons a' m b) == C_cons a' (a::m) (C_cons a m b))
(m : multiset α) : C m :=
quotient.hrec_on m (@list.rec α (λl, C ⟦l⟧) C_0 (λa l b, C_cons a ⟦l⟧ b)) $
assume l l' h,
list.rec_heq_of_perm h
(assume a l l' b b' hl, have ⟦l⟧ = ⟦l'⟧, from quot.sound hl, by cc)
(assume a a' l, C_cons_heq a a' ⟦l⟧)
@[elab_as_eliminator]
protected def rec_on (m : multiset α)
(C_0 : C 0)
(C_cons : Πa m, C m → C (a::m))
(C_cons_heq : ∀a a' m b, C_cons a (a'::m) (C_cons a' m b) == C_cons a' (a::m) (C_cons a m b)) :
C m :=
multiset.rec C_0 C_cons C_cons_heq m
variables {C_0 : C 0} {C_cons : Πa m, C m → C (a::m)}
{C_cons_heq : ∀a a' m b, C_cons a (a'::m) (C_cons a' m b) == C_cons a' (a::m) (C_cons a m b)}
@[simp] lemma rec_on_0 : @multiset.rec_on α C (0:multiset α) C_0 C_cons C_cons_heq = C_0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma rec_on_cons (a : α) (m : multiset α) :
(a :: m).rec_on C_0 C_cons C_cons_heq = C_cons a m (m.rec_on C_0 C_cons C_cons_heq) :=
quotient.induction_on m $ assume l, rfl
end rec
section mem
/-- `a ∈ s` means that `a` has nonzero multiplicity in `s`. -/
def mem (a : α) (s : multiset α) : Prop :=
quot.lift_on s (λ l, a ∈ l) (λ l₁ l₂ (e : l₁ ~ l₂), propext $ mem_of_perm e)
instance : has_mem α (multiset α) := ⟨mem⟩
@[simp] lemma mem_coe {a : α} {l : list α} : a ∈ (l : multiset α) ↔ a ∈ l := iff.rfl
instance decidable_mem [decidable_eq α] (a : α) (s : multiset α) : decidable (a ∈ s) :=
quot.rec_on_subsingleton s $ list.decidable_mem a
@[simp] theorem mem_cons {a b : α} {s : multiset α} : a ∈ b :: s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, iff.rfl
lemma mem_cons_of_mem {a b : α} {s : multiset α} (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ b :: s :=
mem_cons.2 $ or.inr h
@[simp] theorem mem_cons_self (a : α) (s : multiset α) : a ∈ a :: s :=
mem_cons.2 (or.inl rfl)
theorem exists_cons_of_mem {s : multiset α} {a : α} : a ∈ s → ∃ t, s = a :: t :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l (h : a ∈ l),
let ⟨l₁, l₂, e⟩ := mem_split h in
e.symm ▸ ⟨(l₁++l₂ : list α), quot.sound perm_middle⟩
@[simp] theorem not_mem_zero (a : α) : a ∉ (0 : multiset α) := id
theorem eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem {s : multiset α} : (∀x, x ∉ s) → s = 0 :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l H, by rw eq_nil_of_forall_not_mem H; refl
theorem exists_mem_of_ne_zero {s : multiset α} : s ≠ 0 → ∃ a : α, a ∈ s :=
quot.induction_on s $ assume l hl,
match l, hl with
| [] := assume h, false.elim $ h rfl
| (a :: l) := assume _, ⟨a, by simp⟩
end
@[simp] lemma zero_ne_cons {a : α} {m : multiset α} : 0 ≠ a :: m :=
assume h, have a ∈ (0:multiset α), from h.symm ▸ mem_cons_self _ _, not_mem_zero _ this
@[simp] lemma cons_ne_zero {a : α} {m : multiset α} : a :: m ≠ 0 := zero_ne_cons.symm
lemma cons_eq_cons {a b : α} {as bs : multiset α} :
a :: as = b :: bs ↔ ((a = b ∧ as = bs) ∨ (a ≠ b ∧ ∃cs, as = b :: cs ∧ bs = a :: cs)) :=
begin
haveI : decidable_eq α := classical.dec_eq α,
split,
{ assume eq,
by_cases a = b,
{ subst h, simp * at * },
{ have : a ∈ b :: bs, from eq ▸ mem_cons_self _ _,
have : a ∈ bs, by simpa [h],
rcases exists_cons_of_mem this with ⟨cs, hcs⟩,
simp [h, hcs],
have : a :: as = b :: a :: cs, by simp [eq, hcs],
have : a :: as = a :: b :: cs, by rwa [cons_swap],
simpa using this } },
{ assume h,
rcases h with ⟨eq₁, eq₂⟩ | ⟨h, cs, eq₁, eq₂⟩,
{ simp * },
{ simp [*, cons_swap a b] } }
end
end mem
/- subset -/
section subset
/-- `s ⊆ t` is the lift of the list subset relation. It means that any
element with nonzero multiplicity in `s` has nonzero multiplicity in `t`,
but it does not imply that the multiplicity of `a` in `s` is less or equal than in `t`;
see `s ≤ t` for this relation. -/
protected def subset (s t : multiset α) : Prop := ∀ ⦃a : α⦄, a ∈ s → a ∈ t
instance : has_subset (multiset α) := ⟨multiset.subset⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_subset {l₁ l₂ : list α} : (l₁ : multiset α) ⊆ l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem subset.refl (s : multiset α) : s ⊆ s := λ a h, h
theorem subset.trans {s t u : multiset α} : s ⊆ t → t ⊆ u → s ⊆ u :=
λ h₁ h₂ a m, h₂ (h₁ m)
theorem subset_iff {s t : multiset α} : s ⊆ t ↔ (∀⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → x ∈ t) := iff.rfl
theorem mem_of_subset {s t : multiset α} {a : α} (h : s ⊆ t) : a ∈ s → a ∈ t := @h _
@[simp] theorem zero_subset (s : multiset α) : 0 ⊆ s :=
λ a, (not_mem_nil a).elim
@[simp] theorem cons_subset {a : α} {s t : multiset α} : (a :: s) ⊆ t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t :=
by simp [subset_iff, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
theorem eq_zero_of_subset_zero {s : multiset α} (h : s ⊆ 0) : s = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem h
theorem subset_zero {s : multiset α} : s ⊆ 0 ↔ s = 0 :=
⟨eq_zero_of_subset_zero, λ xeq, xeq.symm ▸ subset.refl 0⟩
end subset
/- multiset order -/
/-- `s ≤ t` means that `s` is a sublist of `t` (up to permutation).
Equivalently, `s ≤ t` means that `count a s ≤ count a t` for all `a`. -/
protected def le (s t : multiset α) : Prop :=
quotient.lift_on₂ s t (<+~) $ λ v₁ v₂ w₁ w₂ p₁ p₂,
propext (p₂.subperm_left.trans p₁.subperm_right)
instance : partial_order (multiset α) :=
{ le := multiset.le,
le_refl := λ s, quot.induction_on s $ λ l, subperm.refl _,
le_trans := λ s t u, quotient.induction_on₃ s t u $ @subperm.trans _,
le_antisymm := λ s t, quotient.induction_on₂ s t $
λ l₁ l₂ h₁ h₂, quot.sound (subperm.antisymm h₁ h₂) }
theorem subset_of_le {s t : multiset α} : s ≤ t → s ⊆ t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, subset_of_subperm
theorem mem_of_le {s t : multiset α} {a : α} (h : s ≤ t) : a ∈ s → a ∈ t :=
mem_of_subset (subset_of_le h)
@[simp] theorem coe_le {l₁ l₂ : list α} : (l₁ : multiset α) ≤ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+~ l₂ := iff.rfl
@[elab_as_eliminator] theorem le_induction_on {C : multiset α → multiset α → Prop}
{s t : multiset α} (h : s ≤ t)
(H : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → C l₁ l₂) : C s t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t (λ l₁ l₂ ⟨l, p, s⟩,
(show ⟦l⟧ = ⟦l₁⟧, from quot.sound p) ▸ H s) h
theorem zero_le (s : multiset α) : 0 ≤ s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, subperm_of_sublist $ nil_sublist l
theorem le_zero {s : multiset α} : s ≤ 0 ↔ s = 0 :=
⟨λ h, le_antisymm h (zero_le _), le_of_eq⟩
theorem lt_cons_self (s : multiset α) (a : α) : s < a :: s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l,
suffices l <+~ a :: l ∧ (¬l ~ a :: l),
by simpa [lt_iff_le_and_ne],
⟨subperm_of_sublist (sublist_cons _ _),
λ p, ne_of_lt (lt_succ_self (length l)) (perm_length p)⟩
theorem le_cons_self (s : multiset α) (a : α) : s ≤ a :: s :=
le_of_lt $ lt_cons_self _ _
theorem cons_le_cons_iff (a : α) {s t : multiset α} : a :: s ≤ a :: t ↔ s ≤ t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, subperm_cons a
theorem cons_le_cons (a : α) {s t : multiset α} : s ≤ t → a :: s ≤ a :: t :=
(cons_le_cons_iff a).2
theorem le_cons_of_not_mem {a : α} {s t : multiset α} (m : a ∉ s) : s ≤ a :: t ↔ s ≤ t :=
begin
refine ⟨_, λ h, le_trans h $ le_cons_self _ _⟩,
suffices : ∀ {t'} (_ : s ≤ t') (_ : a ∈ t'), a :: s ≤ t',
{ exact λ h, (cons_le_cons_iff a).1 (this h (mem_cons_self _ _)) },
introv h, revert m, refine le_induction_on h _,
introv s m₁ m₂,
rcases mem_split m₂ with ⟨r₁, r₂, rfl⟩,
exact perm_middle.subperm_left.2 ((subperm_cons _).2 $ subperm_of_sublist $
(sublist_or_mem_of_sublist s).resolve_right m₁)
end
/- cardinality -/
/-- The cardinality of a multiset is the sum of the multiplicities
of all its elements, or simply the length of the underlying list. -/
def card (s : multiset α) : ℕ :=
quot.lift_on s length $ λ l₁ l₂, perm_length
@[simp] theorem coe_card (l : list α) : card (l : multiset α) = length l := rfl
@[simp] theorem card_zero : @card α 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem card_cons (a : α) (s : multiset α) : card (a :: s) = card s + 1 :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, rfl
@[simp] theorem card_singleton (a : α) : card (a::0) = 1 := by simp
theorem card_le_of_le {s t : multiset α} (h : s ≤ t) : card s ≤ card t :=
le_induction_on h $ λ l₁ l₂, length_le_of_sublist
theorem eq_of_le_of_card_le {s t : multiset α} (h : s ≤ t) : card t ≤ card s → s = t :=
le_induction_on h $ λ l₁ l₂ s h₂, congr_arg coe $ eq_of_sublist_of_length_le s h₂
theorem card_lt_of_lt {s t : multiset α} (h : s < t) : card s < card t :=
lt_of_not_ge $ λ h₂, ne_of_lt h $ eq_of_le_of_card_le (le_of_lt h) h₂
theorem lt_iff_cons_le {s t : multiset α} : s < t ↔ ∃ a, a :: s ≤ t :=
⟨quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂ h,
subperm.exists_of_length_lt (le_of_lt h) (card_lt_of_lt h),
λ ⟨a, h⟩, lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_cons_self _ _) h⟩
@[simp] theorem card_eq_zero {s : multiset α} : card s = 0 ↔ s = 0 :=
⟨λ h, (eq_of_le_of_card_le (zero_le _) (le_of_eq h)).symm, λ e, by simp [e]⟩
theorem card_pos {s : multiset α} : 0 < card s ↔ s ≠ 0 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans $ not_congr card_eq_zero
theorem card_pos_iff_exists_mem {s : multiset α} : 0 < card s ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, length_pos_iff_exists_mem
@[elab_as_eliminator] def strong_induction_on {p : multiset α → Sort*} :
∀ (s : multiset α), (∀ s, (∀t < s, p t) → p s) → p s
| s := λ ih, ih s $ λ t h,
have card t < card s, from card_lt_of_lt h,
strong_induction_on t ih
using_well_founded {rel_tac := λ _ _, `[exact ⟨_, measure_wf card⟩]}
theorem strong_induction_eq {p : multiset α → Sort*}
(s : multiset α) (H) : @strong_induction_on _ p s H =
H s (λ t h, @strong_induction_on _ p t H) :=
by rw [strong_induction_on]
@[elab_as_eliminator] lemma case_strong_induction_on {p : multiset α → Prop}
(s : multiset α) (h₀ : p 0) (h₁ : ∀ a s, (∀t ≤ s, p t) → p (a :: s)) : p s :=
multiset.strong_induction_on s $ assume s,
multiset.induction_on s (λ _, h₀) $ λ a s _ ih, h₁ _ _ $
λ t h, ih _ $ lt_of_le_of_lt h $ lt_cons_self _ _
/- singleton -/
@[simp] theorem singleton_eq_singleton (a : α) : singleton a = a::0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_singleton {a b : α} : b ∈ a::0 ↔ b = a := by simp
theorem mem_singleton_self (a : α) : a ∈ (a::0 : multiset α) := mem_cons_self _ _
theorem singleton_inj {a b : α} : a::0 = b::0 ↔ a = b := cons_inj_left _
@[simp] theorem singleton_ne_zero (a : α) : a::0 ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt (lt_cons_self _ _)
@[simp] theorem singleton_le {a : α} {s : multiset α} : a::0 ≤ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨λ h, mem_of_le h (mem_singleton_self _),
λ h, let ⟨t, e⟩ := exists_cons_of_mem h in e.symm ▸ cons_le_cons _ (zero_le _)⟩
theorem card_eq_one {s : multiset α} : card s = 1 ↔ ∃ a, s = a::0 :=
⟨quot.induction_on s $ λ l h,
(list.length_eq_one.1 h).imp $ λ a, congr_arg coe,
λ ⟨a, e⟩, e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
/- add -/
/-- The sum of two multisets is the lift of the list append operation.
This adds the multiplicities of each element,
i.e. `count a (s + t) = count a s + count a t`. -/
protected def add (s₁ s₂ : multiset α) : multiset α :=
quotient.lift_on₂ s₁ s₂ (λ l₁ l₂, ((l₁ ++ l₂ : list α) : multiset α)) $
λ v₁ v₂ w₁ w₂ p₁ p₂, quot.sound $ perm_app p₁ p₂
instance : has_add (multiset α) := ⟨multiset.add⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_add (s t : list α) : (s + t : multiset α) = (s ++ t : list α) := rfl
protected theorem add_comm (s t : multiset α) : s + t = t + s :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, quot.sound perm_app_comm
protected theorem zero_add (s : multiset α) : 0 + s = s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, rfl
theorem singleton_add (a : α) (s : multiset α) : ↑[a] + s = a::s := rfl
protected theorem add_le_add_left (s) {t u : multiset α} : s + t ≤ s + u ↔ t ≤ u :=
quotient.induction_on₃ s t u $ λ l₁ l₂ l₃, subperm_app_left _
protected theorem add_left_cancel (s) {t u : multiset α} (h : s + t = s + u) : t = u :=
le_antisymm ((multiset.add_le_add_left _).1 (le_of_eq h))
((multiset.add_le_add_left _).1 (le_of_eq h.symm))
instance : ordered_cancel_comm_monoid (multiset α) :=
{ zero := 0,
add := (+),
add_comm := multiset.add_comm,
add_assoc := λ s₁ s₂ s₃, quotient.induction_on₃ s₁ s₂ s₃ $ λ l₁ l₂ l₃,
congr_arg coe $ append_assoc l₁ l₂ l₃,
zero_add := multiset.zero_add,
add_zero := λ s, by rw [multiset.add_comm, multiset.zero_add],
add_left_cancel := multiset.add_left_cancel,
add_right_cancel := λ s₁ s₂ s₃ h, multiset.add_left_cancel s₂ $
by simpa [multiset.add_comm] using h,
add_le_add_left := λ s₁ s₂ h s₃, (multiset.add_le_add_left _).2 h,
le_of_add_le_add_left := λ s₁ s₂ s₃, (multiset.add_le_add_left _).1,
..@multiset.partial_order α }
@[simp] theorem cons_add (a : α) (s t : multiset α) : a :: s + t = a :: (s + t) :=
by rw [← singleton_add, ← singleton_add, add_assoc]
@[simp] theorem add_cons (a : α) (s t : multiset α) : s + a :: t = a :: (s + t) :=
by rw [add_comm, cons_add, add_comm]
theorem le_add_right (s t : multiset α) : s ≤ s + t :=
by simpa using add_le_add_left (zero_le t) s
theorem le_add_left (s t : multiset α) : s ≤ t + s :=
by simpa using add_le_add_right (zero_le t) s
@[simp] theorem card_add (s t : multiset α) : card (s + t) = card s + card t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t length_append
@[simp] theorem mem_add {a : α} {s t : multiset α} : a ∈ s + t ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, mem_append
theorem le_iff_exists_add {s t : multiset α} : s ≤ t ↔ ∃ u, t = s + u :=
⟨λ h, le_induction_on h $ λ l₁ l₂ s,
let ⟨l, p⟩ := exists_perm_append_of_sublist s in ⟨l, quot.sound p⟩,
λ⟨u, e⟩, e.symm ▸ le_add_right s u⟩
instance : canonically_ordered_monoid (multiset α) :=
{ lt_of_add_lt_add_left := @lt_of_add_lt_add_left _ _,
le_iff_exists_add := @le_iff_exists_add _,
..multiset.ordered_cancel_comm_monoid }
/- repeat -/
/-- `repeat a n` is the multiset containing only `a` with multiplicity `n`. -/
def repeat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : multiset α := repeat a n
@[simp] lemma repeat_zero (a : α) : repeat a 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma repeat_succ (a : α) (n) : repeat a (n+1) = a :: repeat a n := by simp [repeat]
@[simp] lemma repeat_one (a : α) : repeat a 1 = a :: 0 := by simp
@[simp] lemma card_repeat : ∀ (a : α) n, card (repeat a n) = n := length_repeat
theorem eq_of_mem_repeat {a b : α} {n} : b ∈ repeat a n → b = a := eq_of_mem_repeat
theorem eq_repeat' {a : α} {s : multiset α} : s = repeat a s.card ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b = a :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, iff.trans ⟨λ h,
(perm_repeat.1 $ (quotient.exact h).symm).symm, congr_arg coe⟩ eq_repeat'
theorem eq_repeat_of_mem {a : α} {s : multiset α} : (∀ b ∈ s, b = a) → s = repeat a s.card :=
eq_repeat'.2
theorem eq_repeat {a : α} {n} {s : multiset α} : s = repeat a n ↔ card s = n ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, b = a :=
⟨λ h, h.symm ▸ ⟨card_repeat _ _, λ b, eq_of_mem_repeat⟩,
λ ⟨e, al⟩, e ▸ eq_repeat_of_mem al⟩
theorem repeat_subset_singleton : ∀ (a : α) n, repeat a n ⊆ a::0 := repeat_subset_singleton
theorem repeat_le_coe {a : α} {n} {l : list α} : repeat a n ≤ l ↔ list.repeat a n <+ l :=
⟨λ ⟨l', p, s⟩, (perm_repeat.1 p.symm).symm ▸ s, subperm_of_sublist⟩
/- range -/
/-- `range n` is the multiset lifted from the list `range n`,
that is, the set `{0, 1, ..., n-1}`. -/
def range (n : ℕ) : multiset ℕ := range n
@[simp] theorem range_zero (n : ℕ) : range 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem range_succ (n : ℕ) : range (succ n) = n :: range n :=
by rw [range, range_concat, ← coe_add, add_comm]; refl
@[simp] theorem card_range (n : ℕ) : card (range n) = n := length_range _
theorem range_subset {m n : ℕ} : range m ⊆ range n ↔ m ≤ n := range_subset
@[simp] theorem mem_range {m n : ℕ} : m ∈ range n ↔ m < n := mem_range
@[simp] theorem not_mem_range_self {n : ℕ} : n ∉ range n := not_mem_range_self
/- erase -/
section erase
variables [decidable_eq α] {s t : multiset α} {a b : α}
/-- `erase s a` is the multiset that subtracts 1 from the
multiplicity of `a`. -/
def erase (s : multiset α) (a : α) : multiset α :=
quot.lift_on s (λ l, (l.erase a : multiset α))
(λ l₁ l₂ p, quot.sound (erase_perm_erase a p))
@[simp] theorem coe_erase (l : list α) (a : α) :
erase (l : multiset α) a = l.erase a := rfl
@[simp] theorem erase_zero (a : α) : (0 : multiset α).erase a = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_head (a : α) (s : multiset α) : (a :: s).erase a = s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ erase_cons_head a l
@[simp] theorem erase_cons_tail {a b : α} (s : multiset α) (h : b ≠ a) : (b::s).erase a = b :: s.erase a :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ erase_cons_tail l h
@[simp] theorem erase_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : multiset α} : a ∉ s → s.erase a = s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l h, congr_arg coe $ erase_of_not_mem h
@[simp] theorem cons_erase {s : multiset α} {a : α} : a ∈ s → a :: s.erase a = s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l h, quot.sound (perm_erase h).symm
theorem le_cons_erase (s : multiset α) (a : α) : s ≤ a :: s.erase a :=
if h : a ∈ s then le_of_eq (cons_erase h).symm
else by rw erase_of_not_mem h; apply le_cons_self
@[simp] theorem card_erase_of_mem {a : α} {s : multiset α} : a ∈ s → card (s.erase a) = pred (card s) :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, length_erase_of_mem
theorem erase_add_left_pos {a : α} {s : multiset α} (t) : a ∈ s → (s + t).erase a = s.erase a + t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂ h, congr_arg coe $ erase_append_left l₂ h
theorem erase_add_right_pos {a : α} (s) {t : multiset α} (h : a ∈ t) : (s + t).erase a = s + t.erase a :=
by rw [add_comm, erase_add_left_pos s h, add_comm]
theorem erase_add_right_neg {a : α} {s : multiset α} (t) : a ∉ s → (s + t).erase a = s + t.erase a :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂ h, congr_arg coe $ erase_append_right l₂ h
theorem erase_add_left_neg {a : α} (s) {t : multiset α} (h : a ∉ t) : (s + t).erase a = s.erase a + t :=
by rw [add_comm, erase_add_right_neg s h, add_comm]
theorem erase_le (a : α) (s : multiset α) : s.erase a ≤ s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, subperm_of_sublist (erase_sublist a l)
@[simp] theorem erase_lt {a : α} {s : multiset α} : s.erase a < s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨λ h, not_imp_comm.1 erase_of_not_mem (ne_of_lt h),
λ h, by simpa [h] using lt_cons_self (s.erase a) a⟩
theorem erase_subset (a : α) (s : multiset α) : s.erase a ⊆ s :=
subset_of_le (erase_le a s)
theorem mem_erase_of_ne {a b : α} {s : multiset α} (ab : a ≠ b) : a ∈ s.erase b ↔ a ∈ s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, list.mem_erase_of_ne ab
theorem mem_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {s : multiset α} : a ∈ s.erase b → a ∈ s :=
mem_of_subset (erase_subset _ _)
theorem erase_comm (s : multiset α) (a b : α) : (s.erase a).erase b = (s.erase b).erase a :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ l.erase_comm a b
theorem erase_le_erase {s t : multiset α} (a : α) (h : s ≤ t) : s.erase a ≤ t.erase a :=
le_induction_on h $ λ l₁ l₂ h, subperm_of_sublist (erase_sublist_erase _ h)
theorem erase_le_iff_le_cons {s t : multiset α} {a : α} : s.erase a ≤ t ↔ s ≤ a :: t :=
⟨λ h, le_trans (le_cons_erase _ _) (cons_le_cons _ h),
λ h, if m : a ∈ s
then by rw ← cons_erase m at h; exact (cons_le_cons_iff _).1 h
else le_trans (erase_le _ _) ((le_cons_of_not_mem m).1 h)⟩
end erase
@[simp] theorem coe_reverse (l : list α) : (reverse l : multiset α) = l :=
quot.sound $ reverse_perm _
/- map -/
/-- `map f s` is the lift of the list `map` operation. The multiplicity
of `b` in `map f s` is the number of `a ∈ s` (counting multiplicity)
such that `f a = b`. -/
def map (f : α → β) (s : multiset α) : multiset β :=
quot.lift_on s (λ l : list α, (l.map f : multiset β))
(λ l₁ l₂ p, quot.sound (perm_map f p))
@[simp] theorem coe_map (f : α → β) (l : list α) : map f ↑l = l.map f := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_zero (f : α → β) : map f 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_cons (f : α → β) (a s) : map f (a::s) = f a :: map f s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, rfl
@[simp] lemma map_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : ({a} : multiset α).map f = {f a} := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_add (f : α → β) (s t) : map f (s + t) = map f s + map f t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, congr_arg coe $ map_append _ _ _
@[simp] theorem mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {s : multiset α} :
b ∈ map f s ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, mem_map
@[simp] theorem card_map (f : α → β) (s) : card (map f s) = card s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, length_map _ _
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : α → β) {a : α} {s : multiset α} (h : a ∈ s) : f a ∈ map f s :=
mem_map.2 ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem mem_map_of_inj {f : α → β} (H : function.injective f) {a : α} {s : multiset α} :
f a ∈ map f s ↔ a ∈ s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, mem_map_of_inj H
@[simp] theorem map_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (s : multiset α) : map g (map f s) = map (g ∘ f) s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ list.map_map _ _ _
@[simp] theorem map_id (s : multiset α) : map id s = s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ map_id _
@[simp] lemma map_id' (s : multiset α) : map (λx, x) s = s := map_id s
@[simp] theorem map_const (s : multiset α) (b : β) : map (function.const α b) s = repeat b s.card :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ map_const _ _
@[congr] theorem map_congr {f g : α → β} {s : multiset α} : (∀ x ∈ s, f x = g x) → map f s = map g s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l H, congr_arg coe $ map_congr H
lemma map_hcongr {β' : Type*} {m : multiset α} {f : α → β} {f' : α → β'}
(h : β = β') (hf : ∀a∈m, f a == f' a) : map f m == map f' m :=
begin subst h, simp at hf, simp [map_congr hf] end
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : list α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (function.const α b₂) l) : b₁ = b₂ :=
eq_of_mem_repeat $ by rwa map_const at h
@[simp] theorem map_le_map {f : α → β} {s t : multiset α} (h : s ≤ t) : map f s ≤ map f t :=
le_induction_on h $ λ l₁ l₂ h, subperm_of_sublist $ map_sublist_map f h
@[simp] theorem map_subset_map {f : α → β} {s t : multiset α} (H : s ⊆ t) : map f s ⊆ map f t :=
λ b m, let ⟨a, h, e⟩ := mem_map.1 m in mem_map.2 ⟨a, H h, e⟩
/- fold -/
/-- `foldl f H b s` is the lift of the list operation `foldl f b l`,
which folds `f` over the multiset. It is well defined when `f` is right-commutative,
that is, `f (f b a₁) a₂ = f (f b a₂) a₁`. -/
def foldl (f : β → α → β) (H : right_commutative f) (b : β) (s : multiset α) : β :=
quot.lift_on s (λ l, foldl f b l)
(λ l₁ l₂ p, foldl_eq_of_perm H p b)
@[simp] theorem foldl_zero (f : β → α → β) (H b) : foldl f H b 0 = b := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldl_cons (f : β → α → β) (H b a s) : foldl f H b (a :: s) = foldl f H (f b a) s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, rfl
@[simp] theorem foldl_add (f : β → α → β) (H b s t) : foldl f H b (s + t) = foldl f H (foldl f H b s) t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, foldl_append _ _ _ _
/-- `foldr f H b s` is the lift of the list operation `foldr f b l`,
which folds `f` over the multiset. It is well defined when `f` is left-commutative,
that is, `f a₁ (f a₂ b) = f a₂ (f a₁ b)`. -/
def foldr (f : α → β → β) (H : left_commutative f) (b : β) (s : multiset α) : β :=
quot.lift_on s (λ l, foldr f b l)
(λ l₁ l₂ p, foldr_eq_of_perm H p b)
@[simp] theorem foldr_zero (f : α → β → β) (H b) : foldr f H b 0 = b := rfl
@[simp] theorem foldr_cons (f : α → β → β) (H b a s) : foldr f H b (a :: s) = f a (foldr f H b s) :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, rfl
@[simp] theorem foldr_add (f : α → β → β) (H b s t) : foldr f H b (s + t) = foldr f H (foldr f H b t) s :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, foldr_append _ _ _ _
@[simp] theorem coe_foldr (f : α → β → β) (H : left_commutative f) (b : β) (l : list α) :
foldr f H b l = l.foldr f b := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_foldl (f : β → α → β) (H : right_commutative f) (b : β) (l : list α) :
foldl f H b l = l.foldl f b := rfl
theorem coe_foldr_swap (f : α → β → β) (H : left_commutative f) (b : β) (l : list α) :
foldr f H b l = l.foldl (λ x y, f y x) b :=
(congr_arg (foldr f H b) (coe_reverse l)).symm.trans $ foldr_reverse _ _ _
theorem foldr_swap (f : α → β → β) (H : left_commutative f) (b : β) (s : multiset α) :
foldr f H b s = foldl (λ x y, f y x) (λ x y z, (H _ _ _).symm) b s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, coe_foldr_swap _ _ _ _
theorem foldl_swap (f : β → α → β) (H : right_commutative f) (b : β) (s : multiset α) :
foldl f H b s = foldr (λ x y, f y x) (λ x y z, (H _ _ _).symm) b s :=
(foldr_swap _ _ _ _).symm
/-- Product of a multiset given a commutative monoid structure on `α`.
`prod {a, b, c} = a * b * c` -/
def prod [comm_monoid α] : multiset α → α :=
foldr (*) (λ x y z, by simp [mul_left_comm]) 1
attribute [to_additive multiset.sum._proof_1] prod._proof_1
attribute [to_additive multiset.sum] prod
@[to_additive multiset.sum_eq_foldr]
theorem prod_eq_foldr [comm_monoid α] (s : multiset α) :
prod s = foldr (*) (λ x y z, by simp [mul_left_comm]) 1 s := rfl
@[to_additive multiset.sum_eq_foldl]
theorem prod_eq_foldl [comm_monoid α] (s : multiset α) :
prod s = foldl (*) (λ x y z, by simp [mul_right_comm]) 1 s :=
(foldr_swap _ _ _ _).trans (by simp [mul_comm])
@[simp, to_additive multiset.coe_sum]
theorem coe_prod [comm_monoid α] (l : list α) : prod ↑l = l.prod :=
prod_eq_foldl _
@[simp, to_additive multiset.sum_zero]
theorem prod_zero [comm_monoid α] : @prod α _ 0 = 1 := rfl
@[simp, to_additive multiset.sum_cons]
theorem prod_cons [comm_monoid α] (a : α) (s) : prod (a :: s) = a * prod s :=
foldr_cons _ _ _ _ _
@[to_additive multiset.sum_singleton]
theorem prod_singleton [comm_monoid α] (a : α) : prod (a :: 0) = a := by simp
@[simp, to_additive multiset.sum_add]
theorem prod_add [comm_monoid α] (s t : multiset α) : prod (s + t) = prod s * prod t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, by simp
@[simp] theorem prod_repeat [comm_monoid α] (a : α) (n : ℕ) : prod (multiset.repeat a n) = a ^ n :=
by simp [repeat, list.prod_repeat]
@[simp] theorem sum_repeat [add_comm_monoid α] : ∀ (a : α) (n : ℕ), sum (multiset.repeat a n) = n • a :=
@prod_repeat (multiplicative α) _
attribute [to_additive multiset.sum_repeat] prod_repeat
@[simp] lemma prod_map_one [comm_monoid γ] {m : multiset α} :
prod (m.map (λa, (1 : γ))) = (1 : γ) :=
multiset.induction_on m (by simp) (by simp)
@[simp] lemma sum_map_zero [add_comm_monoid γ] {m : multiset α} :
sum (m.map (λa, (0 : γ))) = (0 : γ) :=
multiset.induction_on m (by simp) (by simp)
attribute [to_additive multiset.sum_map_zero] prod_map_one
@[simp, to_additive multiset.sum_map_add]
lemma prod_map_mul [comm_monoid γ] {m : multiset α} {f g : α → γ} :
prod (m.map $ λa, f a * g a) = prod (m.map f) * prod (m.map g) :=
multiset.induction_on m (by simp) (assume a m ih, by simp [ih]; cc)
lemma prod_map_prod_map [comm_monoid γ] (m : multiset α) (n : multiset β) {f : α → β → γ} :
prod (m.map $ λa, prod $ n.map $ λb, f a b) = prod (n.map $ λb, prod $ m.map $ λa, f a b) :=
multiset.induction_on m (by simp) (assume a m ih, by simp [ih])
lemma sum_map_sum_map [add_comm_monoid γ] : ∀ (m : multiset α) (n : multiset β) {f : α → β → γ},
sum (m.map $ λa, sum $ n.map $ λb, f a b) = sum (n.map $ λb, sum $ m.map $ λa, f a b) :=
@prod_map_prod_map _ _ (multiplicative γ) _
attribute [to_additive multiset.sum_map_sum_map] prod_map_prod_map
lemma sum_map_mul_left [semiring β] {b : β} {s : multiset α} {f : α → β} :
sum (s.map (λa, b * f a)) = b * sum (s.map f) :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp) (assume a s ih, by simp [ih, mul_add])
lemma sum_map_mul_right [semiring β] {b : β} {s : multiset α} {f : α → β} :
sum (s.map (λa, f a * b)) = sum (s.map f) * b :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp) (assume a s ih, by simp [ih, add_mul])
/- join -/
/-- `join S`, where `S` is a multiset of multisets, is the lift of the list join
operation, that is, the union of all the sets.
join {{1, 2}, {1, 2}, {0, 1}} = {0, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2} -/
def join : multiset (multiset α) → multiset α := sum
theorem coe_join : ∀ L : list (list α),
join (L.map (@coe _ (multiset α) _) : multiset (multiset α)) = L.join
| [] := rfl
| (l :: L) := congr_arg (λ s : multiset α, ↑l + s) (coe_join L)
@[simp] theorem join_zero : @join α 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem join_cons (s S) : @join α (s :: S) = s + join S :=
sum_cons _ _
@[simp] theorem join_add (S T) : @join α (S + T) = join S + join T :=
sum_add _ _
@[simp] theorem mem_join {a S} : a ∈ @join α S ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, a ∈ s :=
multiset.induction_on S (by simp) $
by simp [or_and_distrib_right, exists_or_distrib] {contextual := tt}
@[simp] theorem card_join (S) : card (@join α S) = sum (map card S) :=
multiset.induction_on S (by simp) (by simp)
/- bind -/
/-- `bind s f` is the monad bind operation, defined as `join (map f s)`.
It is the union of `f a` as `a` ranges over `s`. -/
def bind (s : multiset α) (f : α → multiset β) : multiset β :=
join (map f s)
@[simp] theorem coe_bind (l : list α) (f : α → list β) :
@bind α β l (λ a, f a) = l.bind f :=
by rw [list.bind, ← coe_join, list.map_map]; refl
@[simp] theorem zero_bind (f : α → multiset β) : bind 0 f = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_bind (a s) (f : α → multiset β) : bind (a::s) f = f a + bind s f :=
by simp [bind]
@[simp] theorem add_bind (s t) (f : α → multiset β) : bind (s + t) f = bind s f + bind t f :=
by simp [bind]
@[simp] theorem bind_zero (s : multiset α) : bind s (λa, 0 : α → multiset β) = 0 :=
by simp [bind, -map_const, join]
@[simp] theorem bind_add (s : multiset α) (f g : α → multiset β) :
bind s (λa, f a + g a) = bind s f + bind s g :=
by simp [bind, join]
@[simp] theorem bind_cons (s : multiset α) (f : α → β) (g : α → multiset β) :
bind s (λa, f a :: g a) = map f s + bind s g :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp) (by simp {contextual := tt})
@[simp] theorem mem_bind {b s} {f : α → multiset β} : b ∈ bind s f ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, b ∈ f a :=
by simp [bind]; simp [-exists_and_distrib_right, exists_and_distrib_right.symm];
rw exists_swap; simp [and_assoc]
@[simp] theorem card_bind (s) (f : α → multiset β) : card (bind s f) = sum (map (card ∘ f) s) :=
by simp [bind]
lemma bind_congr {f g : α → multiset β} {m : multiset α} : (∀a∈m, f a = g a) → bind m f = bind m g :=
by simp [bind] {contextual := tt}
lemma bind_hcongr {β' : Type*} {m : multiset α} {f : α → multiset β} {f' : α → multiset β'}
(h : β = β') (hf : ∀a∈m, f a == f' a) : bind m f == bind m f' :=
begin subst h, simp at hf, simp [bind_congr hf] end
lemma map_bind (m : multiset α) (n : α → multiset β) (f : β → γ) :
map f (bind m n) = bind m (λa, map f (n a)) :=
multiset.induction_on m (by simp) (by simp {contextual := tt})
lemma bind_map (m : multiset α) (n : β → multiset γ) (f : α → β) :
bind (map f m) n = bind m (λa, n (f a)) :=
multiset.induction_on m (by simp) (by simp {contextual := tt})
lemma bind_assoc {s : multiset α} {f : α → multiset β} {g : β → multiset γ} :
(s.bind f).bind g = s.bind (λa, (f a).bind g) :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp) (by simp {contextual := tt})
lemma bind_bind (m : multiset α) (n : multiset β) {f : α → β → multiset γ} :
(bind m $ λa, bind n $ λb, f a b) = (bind n $ λb, bind m $ λa, f a b) :=
multiset.induction_on m (by simp) (by simp {contextual := tt})
lemma bind_map_comm (m : multiset α) (n : multiset β) {f : α → β → γ} :
(bind m $ λa, n.map $ λb, f a b) = (bind n $ λb, m.map $ λa, f a b) :=
multiset.induction_on m (by simp) (by simp {contextual := tt})
@[simp, to_additive multiset.sum_bind]
lemma prod_bind [comm_monoid β] (s : multiset α) (t : α → multiset β) :
prod (bind s t) = prod (s.map $ λa, prod (t a)) :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp) (assume a s ih, by simp [ih, cons_bind])
/- product -/
/-- The multiplicity of `(a, b)` in `product s t` is
the product of the multiplicity of `a` in `s` and `b` in `t`. -/
def product (s : multiset α) (t : multiset β) : multiset (α × β) :=
s.bind $ λ a, t.map $ prod.mk a
@[simp] theorem coe_product (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : list β) :
@product α β l₁ l₂ = l₁.product l₂ :=
by rw [product, list.product, ← coe_bind]; simp
@[simp] theorem zero_product (t) : @product α β 0 t = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_product (a : α) (s : multiset α) (t : multiset β) :
product (a :: s) t = map (prod.mk a) t + product s t :=
by simp [product]
@[simp] theorem product_singleton (a : α) (b : β) : product (a::0) (b::0) = (a,b)::0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_product (s t : multiset α) (u : multiset β) :
product (s + t) u = product s u + product t u :=
by simp [product]
@[simp] theorem product_add (s : multiset α) : ∀ t u : multiset β,
product s (t + u) = product s t + product s u :=
multiset.induction_on s (λ t u, rfl) $ λ a s IH t u,
by rw [cons_product, IH]; simp
@[simp] theorem mem_product {s t} : ∀ {p : α × β}, p ∈ @product α β s t ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t
| (a, b) := by simp [product, and.left_comm]
@[simp] theorem card_product (s : multiset α) (t : multiset β) : card (product s t) = card s * card t :=
by simp [product, repeat, (∘), mul_comm]
/- sigma -/
section
variable {σ : α → Type*}
/-- `sigma s t` is the dependent version of `product`. It is the sum of
`(a, b)` as `a` ranges over `s` and `b` ranges over `t a`. -/
protected def sigma (s : multiset α) (t : Π a, multiset (σ a)) : multiset (Σ a, σ a) :=
s.bind $ λ a, (t a).map $ sigma.mk a
@[simp] theorem coe_sigma (l₁ : list α) (l₂ : Π a, list (σ a)) :
@multiset.sigma α σ l₁ (λ a, l₂ a) = l₁.sigma l₂ :=
by rw [multiset.sigma, list.sigma, ← coe_bind]; simp
@[simp] theorem zero_sigma (t) : @multiset.sigma α σ 0 t = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_sigma (a : α) (s : multiset α) (t : Π a, multiset (σ a)) :
(a :: s).sigma t = map (sigma.mk a) (t a) + s.sigma t :=
by simp [multiset.sigma]
@[simp] theorem sigma_singleton (a : α) (b : α → β) :
(a::0).sigma (λ a, b a::0) = ⟨a, b a⟩::0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_sigma (s t : multiset α) (u : Π a, multiset (σ a)) :
(s + t).sigma u = s.sigma u + t.sigma u :=
by simp [multiset.sigma]
@[simp] theorem sigma_add (s : multiset α) : ∀ t u : Π a, multiset (σ a),
s.sigma (λ a, t a + u a) = s.sigma t + s.sigma u :=
multiset.induction_on s (λ t u, rfl) $ λ a s IH t u,
by rw [cons_sigma, IH]; simp
@[simp] theorem mem_sigma {s t} : ∀ {p : Σ a, σ a},
p ∈ @multiset.sigma α σ s t ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t p.1
| ⟨a, b⟩ := by simp [multiset.sigma, and_assoc, and.left_comm]
@[simp] theorem card_sigma (s : multiset α) (t : Π a, multiset (σ a)) :
card (s.sigma t) = sum (map (λ a, card (t a)) s) :=
by simp [multiset.sigma, (∘)]
end
/- map for partial functions -/
/-- Lift of the list `pmap` operation. Map a partial function `f` over a multiset
`s` whose elements are all in the domain of `f`. -/
def pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β) (s : multiset α) : (∀ a ∈ s, p a) → multiset β :=
quot.rec_on s (λ l H, ↑(pmap f l H)) $ λ l₁ l₂ (pp : l₁ ~ l₂),
funext $ λ (H₂ : ∀ a ∈ l₂, p a),
have H₁ : ∀ a ∈ l₁, p a, from λ a h, H₂ a ((mem_of_perm pp).1 h),
have ∀ {s₂ e H}, @eq.rec (multiset α) l₁
(λ s, (∀ a ∈ s, p a) → multiset β) (λ _, ↑(pmap f l₁ H₁))
s₂ e H = ↑(pmap f l₁ H₁), by intros s₂ e _; subst e,
this.trans $ quot.sound $ perm_pmap f pp
@[simp] theorem coe_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β)
(l : list α) (H : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) : pmap f l H = l.pmap f H := rfl
@[simp] lemma pmap_zero {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β) (h : ∀a∈(0:multiset α), p a) :
pmap f 0 h = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma pmap_cons {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β) (a : α) (m : multiset α) :
∀(h : ∀b∈a::m, p b), pmap f (a :: m) h =
f a (h a (mem_cons_self a m)) :: pmap f m (λa ha, h a $ mem_cons_of_mem ha) :=
quotient.induction_on m $ assume l h, rfl
/-- "Attach" a proof that `a ∈ s` to each element `a` in `s` to produce
a multiset on `{x // x ∈ s}`. -/
def attach (s : multiset α) : multiset {x // x ∈ s} := pmap subtype.mk s (λ a, id)
@[simp] theorem coe_attach (l : list α) :
@eq (multiset {x // x ∈ l}) (@attach α l) l.attach := rfl
theorem pmap_eq_map (p : α → Prop) (f : α → β) (s : multiset α) :
∀ H, @pmap _ _ p (λ a _, f a) s H = map f s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l H, congr_arg coe $ pmap_eq_map p f l H
theorem pmap_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β} {g : Π a, q a → β}
(s : multiset α) {H₁ H₂} (h : ∀ a h₁ h₂, f a h₁ = g a h₂) :
pmap f s H₁ = pmap g s H₂ :=
quot.induction_on s (λ l H₁ H₂, congr_arg coe $ pmap_congr l h) H₁ H₂
theorem map_pmap {p : α → Prop} (g : β → γ) (f : Π a, p a → β)
(s) : ∀ H, map g (pmap f s H) = pmap (λ a h, g (f a h)) s H :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l H, congr_arg coe $ map_pmap g f l H
theorem pmap_eq_map_attach {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β)
(s) : ∀ H, pmap f s H = s.attach.map (λ x, f x.1 (H _ x.2)) :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l H, congr_arg coe $ pmap_eq_map_attach f l H
theorem attach_map_val (s : multiset α) : s.attach.map subtype.val = s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ attach_map_val l
@[simp] theorem mem_attach (s : multiset α) : ∀ x, x ∈ s.attach :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, mem_attach _
@[simp] theorem mem_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β}
{s H b} : b ∈ pmap f s H ↔ ∃ a (h : a ∈ s), f a (H a h) = b :=
quot.induction_on s (λ l H, mem_pmap) H
@[simp] theorem card_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : Π a, p a → β)
(s H) : card (pmap f s H) = card s :=
quot.induction_on s (λ l H, length_pmap) H
@[simp] theorem card_attach {m : multiset α} : card (attach m) = card m := card_pmap _ _ _
@[simp] lemma attach_zero : (0 : multiset α).attach = 0 := rfl
lemma attach_cons (a : α) (m : multiset α) :
(a :: m).attach = ⟨a, mem_cons_self a m⟩ :: (m.attach.map $ λp, ⟨p.1, mem_cons_of_mem p.2⟩) :=
quotient.induction_on m $ assume l, congr_arg coe $ congr_arg (list.cons _) $
by rw [list.map_pmap]; exact list.pmap_congr _ (assume a' h₁ h₂, subtype.eq rfl)
section decidable_pi_exists
variables {m : multiset α}
protected def decidable_forall_multiset {p : α → Prop} [hp : ∀a, decidable (p a)] :
decidable (∀a∈m, p a) :=
quotient.rec_on_subsingleton m (λl, decidable_of_iff (∀a∈l, p a) $ by simp)
instance decidable_dforall_multiset {p : Πa∈m, Prop} [hp : ∀a (h : a ∈ m), decidable (p a h)] :
decidable (∀a (h : a ∈ m), p a h) :=
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff
(@multiset.decidable_forall_multiset {a // a ∈ m} m.attach (λa, p a.1 a.2) _)
(iff.intro (assume h a ha, h ⟨a, ha⟩ (mem_attach _ _)) (assume h ⟨a, ha⟩ _, h _ _))
/-- decidable equality for functions whose domain is bounded by multisets -/
instance decidable_eq_pi_multiset {β : α → Type*} [h : ∀a, decidable_eq (β a)] :
decidable_eq (Πa∈m, β a) :=
assume f g, decidable_of_iff (∀a (h : a ∈ m), f a h = g a h) (by simp [function.funext_iff])
def decidable_exists_multiset {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] :
decidable (∃ x ∈ m, p x) :=
quotient.rec_on_subsingleton m list.decidable_exists_mem
instance decidable_dexists_multiset {p : Πa∈m, Prop} [hp : ∀a (h : a ∈ m), decidable (p a h)] :
decidable (∃a (h : a ∈ m), p a h) :=
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff
(@multiset.decidable_exists_multiset {a // a ∈ m} m.attach (λa, p a.1 a.2) _)
(iff.intro (λ ⟨⟨a, ha₁⟩, _, ha₂⟩, ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩)
(λ ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩, ⟨⟨a, ha₁⟩, mem_attach _ _, ha₂⟩))
end decidable_pi_exists
/- subtraction -/
section
variables [decidable_eq α] {s t u : multiset α} {a b : α}
/-- `s - t` is the multiset such that
`count a (s - t) = count a s - count a t` for all `a`. -/
protected def sub (s t : multiset α) : multiset α :=
quotient.lift_on₂ s t (λ l₁ l₂, (l₁.diff l₂ : multiset α)) $ λ v₁ v₂ w₁ w₂ p₁ p₂,
quot.sound $ perm_diff_right w₁ p₂ ▸ perm_diff_left _ p₁
instance : has_sub (multiset α) := ⟨multiset.sub⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_sub (s t : list α) : (s - t : multiset α) = (s.diff t : list α) := rfl
theorem sub_eq_fold_erase (s t : multiset α) : s - t = foldl erase erase_comm s t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂,
show ↑(l₁.diff l₂) = foldl erase erase_comm ↑l₁ ↑l₂,
by rw diff_eq_foldl l₁ l₂; exact foldl_hom _ _ _ _ (λ x y, rfl) _
@[simp] theorem sub_zero (s : multiset α) : s - 0 = s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_cons (a : α) (s t : multiset α) : s - a::t = s.erase a - t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, congr_arg coe $ diff_cons _ _ _
theorem add_sub_of_le (h : s ≤ t) : s + (t - s) = t :=
begin
revert t,
refine multiset.induction_on s (by simp) (λ a s IH t h, _),
have := cons_erase (mem_of_le h (mem_cons_self _ _)),
rw [cons_add, sub_cons, IH, this],
exact (cons_le_cons_iff a).1 (this.symm ▸ h)
end
theorem sub_add' : s - (t + u) = s - t - u :=
quotient.induction_on₃ s t u $
λ l₁ l₂ l₃, congr_arg coe $ diff_append _ _ _
theorem sub_add_cancel (h : t ≤ s) : s - t + t = s :=
by rw [add_comm, add_sub_of_le h]
theorem add_sub_cancel_left (s : multiset α) : ∀ t, s + t - s = t :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp)
(λ a s IH t, by rw [cons_add, sub_cons, erase_cons_head, IH])
theorem add_sub_cancel (s t : multiset α) : s + t - t = s :=
by rw [add_comm, add_sub_cancel_left]
theorem sub_le_sub_right (h : s ≤ t) (u) : s - u ≤ t - u :=
by revert s t h; exact
multiset.induction_on u (by simp {contextual := tt})
(λ a u IH s t h, by simp [IH, erase_le_erase a h])
theorem sub_le_sub_left (h : s ≤ t) : ∀ u, u - t ≤ u - s :=
le_induction_on h $ λ l₁ l₂ h, begin
induction h with l₁ l₂ a s IH l₁ l₂ a s IH; intro u,
{ refl },
{ rw [← cons_coe, sub_cons],
exact le_trans (sub_le_sub_right (erase_le _ _) _) (IH u) },
{ rw [← cons_coe, sub_cons, ← cons_coe, sub_cons],
exact IH _ }
end
theorem sub_le_iff_le_add : s - t ≤ u ↔ s ≤ u + t :=
by revert s; exact
multiset.induction_on t (by simp)
(λ a t IH s, by simp [IH, erase_le_iff_le_cons])
theorem le_sub_add (s t : multiset α) : s ≤ s - t + t :=
sub_le_iff_le_add.1 (le_refl _)
theorem sub_le_self (s t : multiset α) : s - t ≤ s :=
sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (le_add_right _ _)
@[simp] theorem card_sub {s t : multiset α} (h : t ≤ s) : card (s - t) = card s - card t :=
(nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add $ by rw [add_comm, ← card_add, sub_add_cancel h]).symm
/- union -/
/-- `s ∪ t` is the lattice join operation with respect to the
multiset `≤`. The multiplicity of `a` in `s ∪ t` is the maximum
of the multiplicities in `s` and `t`. -/
def union (s t : multiset α) : multiset α := s - t + t
instance : has_union (multiset α) := ⟨union⟩
theorem union_def (s t : multiset α) : s ∪ t = s - t + t := rfl
theorem le_union_left (s t : multiset α) : s ≤ s ∪ t := le_sub_add _ _
theorem le_union_right (s t : multiset α) : t ≤ s ∪ t := le_add_left _ _
theorem eq_union_left : t ≤ s → s ∪ t = s := sub_add_cancel
theorem union_le_union_right (h : s ≤ t) (u) : s ∪ u ≤ t ∪ u :=
add_le_add_right (sub_le_sub_right h _) u
theorem union_le (h₁ : s ≤ u) (h₂ : t ≤ u) : s ∪ t ≤ u :=
by rw ← eq_union_left h₂; exact union_le_union_right h₁ t
@[simp] theorem mem_union : a ∈ s ∪ t ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t :=
⟨λ h, (mem_add.1 h).imp_left (mem_of_le $ sub_le_self _ _),
or.rec (mem_of_le $ le_union_left _ _) (mem_of_le $ le_union_right _ _)⟩
@[simp] theorem map_union [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} (finj : function.injective f) {s t : multiset α} :
map f (s ∪ t) = map f s ∪ map f t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂,
congr_arg coe (by rw [list.map_append f, list.map_diff finj])
/- inter -/
/-- `s ∩ t` is the lattice meet operation with respect to the
multiset `≤`. The multiplicity of `a` in `s ∩ t` is the minimum
of the multiplicities in `s` and `t`. -/
def inter (s t : multiset α) : multiset α :=
quotient.lift_on₂ s t (λ l₁ l₂, (l₁.bag_inter l₂ : multiset α)) $ λ v₁ v₂ w₁ w₂ p₁ p₂,
quot.sound $ perm_bag_inter_right w₁ p₂ ▸ perm_bag_inter_left _ p₁
instance : has_inter (multiset α) := ⟨inter⟩
@[simp] theorem inter_zero (s : multiset α) : s ∩ 0 = 0 :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe l.bag_inter_nil
@[simp] theorem zero_inter (s : multiset α) : 0 ∩ s = 0 :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe l.nil_bag_inter
@[simp] theorem cons_inter_of_pos {a} (s : multiset α) {t} :
a ∈ t → (a :: s) ∩ t = a :: s ∩ t.erase a :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂ h,
congr_arg coe $ cons_bag_inter_of_pos _ h
@[simp] theorem cons_inter_of_neg {a} (s : multiset α) {t} :
a ∉ t → (a :: s) ∩ t = s ∩ t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂ h,
congr_arg coe $ cons_bag_inter_of_neg _ h
theorem inter_le_left (s t : multiset α) : s ∩ t ≤ s :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂,
subperm_of_sublist $ bag_inter_sublist_left _ _
theorem inter_le_right (s : multiset α) : ∀ t, s ∩ t ≤ t :=
multiset.induction_on s (λ t, (zero_inter t).symm ▸ zero_le _) $
λ a s IH t, if h : a ∈ t
then by simpa [h] using cons_le_cons a (IH (t.erase a))
else by simp [h, IH]
theorem le_inter (h₁ : s ≤ t) (h₂ : s ≤ u) : s ≤ t ∩ u :=
begin
revert s u, refine multiset.induction_on t _ (λ a t IH, _); intros,
{ simp [h₁] },
by_cases a ∈ u,
{ rw [cons_inter_of_pos _ h, ← erase_le_iff_le_cons],
exact IH (erase_le_iff_le_cons.2 h₁) (erase_le_erase _ h₂) },
{ rw cons_inter_of_neg _ h,
exact IH ((le_cons_of_not_mem $ mt (mem_of_le h₂) h).1 h₁) h₂ }
end
@[simp] theorem mem_inter : a ∈ s ∩ t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t :=
⟨λ h, ⟨mem_of_le (inter_le_left _ _) h, mem_of_le (inter_le_right _ _) h⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, by rw [← cons_erase h₁, cons_inter_of_pos _ h₂]; apply mem_cons_self⟩
instance : lattice (multiset α) :=
{ sup := (∪),
sup_le := @union_le _ _,
le_sup_left := le_union_left,
le_sup_right := le_union_right,
inf := (∩),
le_inf := @le_inter _ _,
inf_le_left := inter_le_left,
inf_le_right := inter_le_right,
..@multiset.partial_order α }
@[simp] theorem sup_eq_union (s t : multiset α) : s ⊔ t = s ∪ t := rfl
@[simp] theorem inf_eq_inter (s t : multiset α) : s ⊓ t = s ∩ t := rfl
@[simp] theorem le_inter_iff : s ≤ t ∩ u ↔ s ≤ t ∧ s ≤ u := le_inf_iff
@[simp] theorem union_le_iff : s ∪ t ≤ u ↔ s ≤ u ∧ t ≤ u := sup_le_iff
instance : semilattice_inf_bot (multiset α) :=
{ bot := 0, bot_le := zero_le, ..multiset.lattice.lattice }
theorem union_comm (s t : multiset α) : s ∪ t = t ∪ s := sup_comm
theorem inter_comm (s t : multiset α) : s ∩ t = t ∩ s := inf_comm
theorem eq_union_right (h : s ≤ t) : s ∪ t = t :=
by rw [union_comm, eq_union_left h]
theorem union_le_union_left (h : s ≤ t) (u) : u ∪ s ≤ u ∪ t :=
sup_le_sup_left h _
theorem union_le_add (s t : multiset α) : s ∪ t ≤ s + t :=
union_le (le_add_right _ _) (le_add_left _ _)
theorem union_add_distrib (s t u : multiset α) : (s ∪ t) + u = (s + u) ∪ (t + u) :=
by simpa [(∪), union, eq_comm] using show s + u - (t + u) = s - t,
by rw [add_comm t, sub_add', add_sub_cancel]
theorem add_union_distrib (s t u : multiset α) : s + (t ∪ u) = (s + t) ∪ (s + u) :=
by rw [add_comm, union_add_distrib, add_comm s, add_comm s]
theorem cons_union_distrib (a : α) (s t : multiset α) : a :: (s ∪ t) = (a :: s) ∪ (a :: t) :=
by simpa using add_union_distrib (a::0) s t
theorem inter_add_distrib (s t u : multiset α) : (s ∩ t) + u = (s + u) ∩ (t + u) :=
begin
by_contra h,
cases lt_iff_cons_le.1 (lt_of_le_of_ne (le_inter
(add_le_add_right (inter_le_left s t) u)
(add_le_add_right (inter_le_right s t) u)) h) with a hl,
rw ← cons_add at hl,
exact not_le_of_lt (lt_cons_self (s ∩ t) a) (le_inter
(le_of_add_le_add_right (le_trans hl (inter_le_left _ _)))
(le_of_add_le_add_right (le_trans hl (inter_le_right _ _))))
end
theorem add_inter_distrib (s t u : multiset α) : s + (t ∩ u) = (s + t) ∩ (s + u) :=
by rw [add_comm, inter_add_distrib, add_comm s, add_comm s]
theorem cons_inter_distrib (a : α) (s t : multiset α) : a :: (s ∩ t) = (a :: s) ∩ (a :: t) :=
by simp
theorem union_add_inter (s t : multiset α) : s ∪ t + s ∩ t = s + t :=
begin
apply le_antisymm,
{ rw union_add_distrib,
refine union_le (add_le_add_left (inter_le_right _ _) _) _,
rw add_comm, exact add_le_add_right (inter_le_left _ _) _ },
{ rw [add_comm, add_inter_distrib],
refine le_inter (add_le_add_right (le_union_right _ _) _) _,
rw add_comm, exact add_le_add_right (le_union_left _ _) _ }
end
theorem sub_add_inter (s t : multiset α) : s - t + s ∩ t = s :=
begin
rw [inter_comm],
revert s, refine multiset.induction_on t (by simp) (λ a t IH s, _),
by_cases a ∈ s,
{ rw [cons_inter_of_pos _ h, sub_cons, add_cons, IH, cons_erase h] },
{ rw [cons_inter_of_neg _ h, sub_cons, erase_of_not_mem h, IH] }
end
theorem sub_inter (s t : multiset α) : s - (s ∩ t) = s - t :=
add_right_cancel $
by rw [sub_add_inter s t, sub_add_cancel (inter_le_left _ _)]
end
/- filter -/
section
variables {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
/-- `filter p s` returns the elements in `s` (with the same multiplicities)
which satisfy `p`, and removes the rest. -/
def filter (p : α → Prop) [h : decidable_pred p] (s : multiset α) : multiset α :=
quot.lift_on s (λ l, (filter p l : multiset α))
(λ l₁ l₂ h, quot.sound $ perm_filter p h)
@[simp] theorem coe_filter (p : α → Prop) [h : decidable_pred p]
(l : list α) : filter p (↑l) = l.filter p := rfl
@[simp] theorem filter_zero (p : α → Prop) [h : decidable_pred p] : filter p 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem filter_cons_of_pos {a : α} (s) : p a → filter p (a::s) = a :: filter p s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l h, congr_arg coe $ filter_cons_of_pos l h
@[simp] theorem filter_cons_of_neg {a : α} (s) : ¬ p a → filter p (a::s) = filter p s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l h, @congr_arg _ _ _ _ coe $ filter_cons_of_neg l h
lemma filter_congr {p q : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] [decidable_pred q]
{s : multiset α} : (∀ x ∈ s, p x ↔ q x) → filter p s = filter q s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l h, congr_arg coe $ filter_congr h
@[simp] theorem filter_add (s t : multiset α) :
filter p (s + t) = filter p s + filter p t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, congr_arg coe $ filter_append _ _
@[simp] theorem filter_le (s : multiset α) : filter p s ≤ s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, subperm_of_sublist $ filter_sublist _
@[simp] theorem filter_subset (s : multiset α) : filter p s ⊆ s :=
subset_of_le $ filter_le _
@[simp] theorem mem_filter {a : α} {s} : a ∈ filter p s ↔ a ∈ s ∧ p a :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, mem_filter
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} {s} (h : a ∈ filter p s) : p a :=
(mem_filter.1 h).2
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {s} (h : a ∈ filter p s) : a ∈ s :=
(mem_filter.1 h).1
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} {l} (m : a ∈ l) (h : p a) : a ∈ filter p l :=
mem_filter.2 ⟨m, h⟩
theorem filter_eq_self {s} : filter p s = s ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, p a :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, iff.trans ⟨λ h,
eq_of_sublist_of_length_eq (filter_sublist _) (@congr_arg _ _ _ _ card h),
congr_arg coe⟩ filter_eq_self
theorem filter_eq_nil {s} : filter p s = 0 ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ¬p a :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, iff.trans ⟨λ h,
eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero (@congr_arg _ _ _ _ card h),
congr_arg coe⟩ filter_eq_nil
theorem filter_le_filter {s t} (h : s ≤ t) : filter p s ≤ filter p t :=
le_induction_on h $ λ l₁ l₂ h, subperm_of_sublist $ filter_sublist_filter h
theorem le_filter {s t} : s ≤ filter p t ↔ s ≤ t ∧ ∀ a ∈ s, p a :=
⟨λ h, ⟨le_trans h (filter_le _), λ a m, of_mem_filter (mem_of_le h m)⟩,
λ ⟨h, al⟩, filter_eq_self.2 al ▸ filter_le_filter h⟩
@[simp] theorem filter_sub [decidable_eq α] (s t : multiset α) :
filter p (s - t) = filter p s - filter p t :=
begin
revert s, refine multiset.induction_on t (by simp) (λ a t IH s, _),
rw [sub_cons, IH],
by_cases p a,
{ rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ h, sub_cons], congr,
by_cases m : a ∈ s,
{ rw [← cons_inj_right a, ← filter_cons_of_pos _ h,
cons_erase (mem_filter_of_mem m h), cons_erase m] },
{ rw [erase_of_not_mem m, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_filter m)] } },
{ rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ h],
by_cases m : a ∈ s,
{ rw [(by rw filter_cons_of_neg _ h : filter p (erase s a) = filter p (a :: erase s a)),
cons_erase m] },
{ rw [erase_of_not_mem m] } }
end
@[simp] theorem filter_union [decidable_eq α] (s t : multiset α) :
filter p (s ∪ t) = filter p s ∪ filter p t :=
by simp [(∪), union]
@[simp] theorem filter_inter [decidable_eq α] (s t : multiset α) :
filter p (s ∩ t) = filter p s ∩ filter p t :=
le_antisymm (le_inter
(filter_le_filter $ inter_le_left _ _)
(filter_le_filter $ inter_le_right _ _)) $ le_filter.2
⟨inf_le_inf (filter_le _) (filter_le _),
λ a h, of_mem_filter (mem_of_le (inter_le_left _ _) h)⟩
@[simp] theorem filter_filter {q} [decidable_pred q] (s : multiset α) :
filter p (filter q s) = filter (λ a, p a ∧ q a) s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ filter_filter l
theorem filter_add_filter {q} [decidable_pred q] (s : multiset α) :
filter p s + filter q s = filter (λ a, p a ∨ q a) s + filter (λ a, p a ∧ q a) s :=
multiset.induction_on s rfl $ λ a s IH,
by by_cases p a; by_cases q a; simp *
theorem filter_add_not (s : multiset α) :
filter p s + filter (λ a, ¬ p a) s = s :=
by rw [filter_add_filter, filter_eq_self.2, filter_eq_nil.2]; simp [decidable.em]
/- filter_map -/
/-- `filter_map f s` is a combination filter/map operation on `s`.
The function `f : α → option β` is applied to each element of `s`;
if `f a` is `some b` then `b` is added to the result, otherwise
`a` is removed from the resulting multiset. -/
def filter_map (f : α → option β) (s : multiset α) : multiset β :=
quot.lift_on s (λ l, (filter_map f l : multiset β))
(λ l₁ l₂ h, quot.sound $perm_filter_map f h)
@[simp] theorem coe_filter_map (f : α → option β) (l : list α) : filter_map f l = l.filter_map f := rfl
@[simp] theorem filter_map_zero (f : α → option β) : filter_map f 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem filter_map_cons_none {f : α → option β} (a : α) (s : multiset α) (h : f a = none) :
filter_map f (a :: s) = filter_map f s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, @congr_arg _ _ _ _ coe $ filter_map_cons_none a l h
@[simp] theorem filter_map_cons_some (f : α → option β)
(a : α) (s : multiset α) {b : β} (h : f a = some b) :
filter_map f (a :: s) = b :: filter_map f s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, @congr_arg _ _ _ _ coe $ filter_map_cons_some f a l h
theorem filter_map_eq_map (f : α → β) : filter_map (some ∘ f) = map f :=
funext $ λ s, quot.induction_on s $ λ l,
@congr_arg _ _ _ _ coe $ congr_fun (filter_map_eq_map f) l
theorem filter_map_eq_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] :
filter_map (option.guard p) = filter p :=
funext $ λ s, quot.induction_on s $ λ l,
@congr_arg _ _ _ _ coe $ congr_fun (filter_map_eq_filter p) l
theorem filter_map_filter_map (f : α → option β) (g : β → option γ) (s : multiset α) :
filter_map g (filter_map f s) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).bind g) s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ filter_map_filter_map f g l
theorem map_filter_map (f : α → option β) (g : β → γ) (s : multiset α) :
map g (filter_map f s) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).map g) s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ map_filter_map f g l
theorem filter_map_map (f : α → β) (g : β → option γ) (s : multiset α) :
filter_map g (map f s) = filter_map (g ∘ f) s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ filter_map_map f g l
theorem filter_filter_map (f : α → option β) (p : β → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (s : multiset α) :
filter p (filter_map f s) = filter_map (λ x, (f x).filter p) s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ filter_filter_map f p l
theorem filter_map_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (f : α → option β) (s : multiset α) :
filter_map f (filter p s) = filter_map (λ x, if p x then f x else none) s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ filter_map_filter p f l
@[simp] theorem filter_map_some (s : multiset α) : filter_map some s = s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ filter_map_some l
@[simp] theorem mem_filter_map (f : α → option β) (s : multiset α) {b : β} :
b ∈ filter_map f s ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = some b :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, mem_filter_map f l
theorem map_filter_map_of_inv (f : α → option β) (g : β → α)
(H : ∀ x : α, (f x).map g = some x) (s : multiset α) :
map g (filter_map f s) = s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, congr_arg coe $ map_filter_map_of_inv f g H l
theorem filter_map_le_filter_map (f : α → option β) {s t : multiset α}
(h : s ≤ t) : filter_map f s ≤ filter_map f t :=
le_induction_on h $ λ l₁ l₂ h,
subperm_of_sublist $ filter_map_sublist_filter_map _ h
/- powerset -/
def powerset_aux (l : list α) : list (multiset α) :=
0 :: sublists_aux l (λ x y, x :: y)
theorem powerset_aux_eq_map_coe {l : list α} :
powerset_aux l = (sublists l).map coe :=
by simp [powerset_aux, sublists];
rw [← show @sublists_aux₁ α (multiset α) l (λ x, [↑x]) =
sublists_aux l (λ x, list.cons ↑x),
from sublists_aux₁_eq_sublists_aux _ _,
sublists_aux_cons_eq_sublists_aux₁,
← bind_ret_eq_map, sublists_aux₁_bind]; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_powerset_aux {l : list α} {s} :
s ∈ powerset_aux l ↔ s ≤ ↑l :=
quotient.induction_on s $
by simp [powerset_aux_eq_map_coe, subperm, and.comm]
def powerset_aux' (l : list α) : list (multiset α) := (sublists' l).map coe
theorem powerset_aux_perm_powerset_aux' {l : list α} :
powerset_aux l ~ powerset_aux' l :=
by rw powerset_aux_eq_map_coe; exact
perm_map _ (sublists_perm_sublists' _)
@[simp] theorem powerset_aux'_nil : powerset_aux' (@nil α) = [0] := rfl
@[simp] theorem powerset_aux'_cons (a : α) (l : list α) :
powerset_aux' (a::l) = powerset_aux' l ++ list.map (cons a) (powerset_aux' l) :=
by simp [powerset_aux']; refl
theorem powerset_aux'_perm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
powerset_aux' l₁ ~ powerset_aux' l₂ :=
begin
induction p with a l₁ l₂ p IH a b l l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁ p₂ IH₁ IH₂, {simp},
{ simp, exact perm_app IH (perm_map _ IH) },
{ simp, apply perm_app_right,
rw [← append_assoc, ← append_assoc,
(by funext s; simp [cons_swap] : cons b ∘ cons a = cons a ∘ cons b)],
exact perm_app_left _ perm_app_comm },
{ exact IH₁.trans IH₂ }
end
theorem powerset_aux_perm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
powerset_aux l₁ ~ powerset_aux l₂ :=
powerset_aux_perm_powerset_aux'.trans $
(powerset_aux'_perm p).trans powerset_aux_perm_powerset_aux'.symm
def powerset (s : multiset α) : multiset (multiset α) :=
quot.lift_on s
(λ l, (powerset_aux l : multiset (multiset α)))
(λ l₁ l₂ h, quot.sound (powerset_aux_perm h))
theorem powerset_coe (l : list α) :
@powerset α l = ((sublists l).map coe : list (multiset α)) :=
congr_arg coe powerset_aux_eq_map_coe
@[simp] theorem powerset_coe' (l : list α) :
@powerset α l = ((sublists' l).map coe : list (multiset α)) :=
quot.sound powerset_aux_perm_powerset_aux'
@[simp] theorem powerset_zero : @powerset α 0 = 0::0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem powerset_cons (a : α) (s) :
powerset (a::s) = powerset s + map (cons a) (powerset s) :=
quotient.induction_on s $ λ l, by simp; refl
@[simp] theorem mem_powerset {s t : multiset α} :
s ∈ powerset t ↔ s ≤ t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ by simp [subperm, and.comm]
theorem map_single_le_powerset (s : multiset α) :
s.map (λ a, a::0) ≤ powerset s :=
quotient.induction_on s $ λ l, begin
simp [powerset_coe],
show l.map (coe ∘ list.ret) <+~ (sublists l).map coe,
rw ← list.map_map,
exact subperm_of_sublist
(map_sublist_map _ (map_ret_sublist_sublists _))
end
@[simp] theorem card_powerset (s : multiset α) :
card (powerset s) = 2 ^ card s :=
quotient.induction_on s $ by simp
/- diagonal -/
theorem revzip_powerset_aux {l : list α} ⦃s t⦄
(h : (s, t) ∈ revzip (powerset_aux l)) : s + t = ↑l :=
begin
rw [revzip, powerset_aux_eq_map_coe, ← map_reverse, zip_map, ← revzip] at h,
simp at h, rcases h with ⟨l₁, l₂, h, rfl, rfl⟩,
exact quot.sound (revzip_sublists _ _ _ h)
end
theorem revzip_powerset_aux' {l : list α} ⦃s t⦄
(h : (s, t) ∈ revzip (powerset_aux' l)) : s + t = ↑l :=
begin
rw [revzip, powerset_aux', ← map_reverse, zip_map, ← revzip] at h,
simp at h, rcases h with ⟨l₁, l₂, h, rfl, rfl⟩,
exact quot.sound (revzip_sublists' _ _ _ h)
end
theorem revzip_powerset_aux_lemma [decidable_eq α] (l : list α)
{l' : list (multiset α)} (H : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, (s, t) ∈ revzip l' → s + t = ↑l) :
revzip l' = l'.map (λ x, (x, ↑l - x)) :=
begin
have : forall₂ (λ (p : multiset α × multiset α) (s : multiset α), p = (s, ↑l - s))
(revzip l') ((revzip l').map prod.fst),
{ rw forall₂_map_right_iff,
apply forall₂_same, rintro ⟨s, t⟩ h,
dsimp, rw [← H h, add_sub_cancel_left] },
rw [← forall₂_eq_eq_eq, forall₂_map_right_iff], simpa
end
theorem revzip_powerset_aux_perm_aux' {l : list α} :
revzip (powerset_aux l) ~ revzip (powerset_aux' l) :=
begin
haveI := classical.dec_eq α,
rw [revzip_powerset_aux_lemma l revzip_powerset_aux,
revzip_powerset_aux_lemma l revzip_powerset_aux'],
exact perm_map _ powerset_aux_perm_powerset_aux',
end
theorem revzip_powerset_aux_perm {l₁ l₂ : list α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
revzip (powerset_aux l₁) ~ revzip (powerset_aux l₂) :=
begin
haveI := classical.dec_eq α,
simp [λ l:list α, revzip_powerset_aux_lemma l revzip_powerset_aux, coe_eq_coe.2 p],
exact perm_map _ (powerset_aux_perm p)
end
def diagonal (s : multiset α) : multiset (multiset α × multiset α) :=
quot.lift_on s
(λ l, (revzip (powerset_aux l) : multiset (multiset α × multiset α)))
(λ l₁ l₂ h, quot.sound (revzip_powerset_aux_perm h))
theorem diagonal_coe (l : list α) :
@diagonal α l = revzip (powerset_aux l) := rfl
@[simp] theorem diagonal_coe' (l : list α) :
@diagonal α l = revzip (powerset_aux' l) :=
quot.sound revzip_powerset_aux_perm_aux'
@[simp] theorem mem_diagonal {s₁ s₂ t : multiset α} :
(s₁, s₂) ∈ diagonal t ↔ s₁ + s₂ = t :=
quotient.induction_on t $ λ l, begin
simp [diagonal_coe], refine ⟨λ h, revzip_powerset_aux h, λ h, _⟩,
haveI := classical.dec_eq α,
simp [revzip_powerset_aux_lemma l revzip_powerset_aux, h.symm],
exact ⟨_, le_add_right _ _, rfl, add_sub_cancel_left _ _⟩
end
@[simp] theorem diagonal_map_fst (s : multiset α) :
(diagonal s).map prod.fst = powerset s :=
quotient.induction_on s $ λ l,
by simp [powerset_aux']
@[simp] theorem diagonal_map_snd (s : multiset α) :
(diagonal s).map prod.snd = powerset s :=
quotient.induction_on s $ λ l,
by simp [powerset_aux']
@[simp] theorem diagonal_zero : @diagonal α 0 = (0, 0)::0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem diagonal_cons (a : α) (s) : diagonal (a::s) =
map (prod.map id (cons a)) (diagonal s) +
map (prod.map (cons a) id) (diagonal s) :=
quotient.induction_on s $ λ l, begin
simp [revzip, reverse_append],
rw [← zip_map, ← zip_map, zip_append, (_ : _++_=_)],
{congr; simp}, {simp}
end
@[simp] theorem card_diagonal (s : multiset α) :
card (diagonal s) = 2 ^ card s :=
by have := card_powerset s;
rwa [← diagonal_map_fst, card_map] at this
/- countp -/
/-- `countp p s` counts the number of elements of `s` (with multiplicity) that
satisfy `p`. -/
def countp (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (s : multiset α) : ℕ :=
quot.lift_on s (countp p) (λ l₁ l₂, perm_countp p)
@[simp] theorem coe_countp (l : list α) : countp p l = l.countp p := rfl
@[simp] theorem countp_zero (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] : countp p 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem countp_cons_of_pos {a : α} (s) : p a → countp p (a::s) = countp p s + 1 :=
quot.induction_on s countp_cons_of_pos
@[simp] theorem countp_cons_of_neg {a : α} (s) : ¬ p a → countp p (a::s) = countp p s :=
quot.induction_on s countp_cons_of_neg
theorem countp_eq_card_filter (s) : countp p s = card (filter p s) :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, countp_eq_length_filter _
@[simp] theorem countp_add (s t) : countp p (s + t) = countp p s + countp p t :=
by simp [countp_eq_card_filter]
theorem countp_pos {s} : 0 < countp p s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, p a :=
by simp [countp_eq_card_filter, card_pos_iff_exists_mem]
@[simp] theorem countp_sub [decidable_eq α] {s t : multiset α} (h : t ≤ s) :
countp p (s - t) = countp p s - countp p t :=
by simp [countp_eq_card_filter, h, filter_le_filter]
theorem countp_pos_of_mem {s a} (h : a ∈ s) (pa : p a) : 0 < countp p s :=
countp_pos.2 ⟨_, h, pa⟩
theorem countp_le_of_le {s t} (h : s ≤ t) : countp p s ≤ countp p t :=
by simpa [countp_eq_card_filter] using card_le_of_le (filter_le_filter h)
@[simp] theorem countp_filter {q} [decidable_pred q] (s : multiset α) :
countp p (filter q s) = countp (λ a, p a ∧ q a) s :=
by simp [countp_eq_card_filter]
end
/- count -/
section
variable [decidable_eq α]
/-- `count a s` is the multiplicity of `a` in `s`. -/
def count (a : α) : multiset α → ℕ := countp (eq a)
@[simp] theorem coe_count (a : α) (l : list α) : count a (↑l) = l.count a := coe_countp _
@[simp] theorem count_zero (a : α) : count a 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem count_cons_self (a : α) (s : multiset α) : count a (a::s) = succ (count a s) :=
countp_cons_of_pos _ rfl
@[simp] theorem count_cons_of_ne {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) (s : multiset α) : count a (b::s) = count a s :=
countp_cons_of_neg _ h
theorem count_le_of_le (a : α) {s t} : s ≤ t → count a s ≤ count a t :=
countp_le_of_le
theorem count_le_count_cons (a b : α) (s : multiset α) : count a s ≤ count a (b :: s) :=
count_le_of_le _ (le_cons_self _ _)
theorem count_singleton (a : α) : count a (a::0) = 1 :=
by simp
@[simp] theorem count_add (a : α) : ∀ s t, count a (s + t) = count a s + count a t :=
countp_add
@[simp] theorem count_smul (a : α) (n s) : count a (n • s) = n * count a s :=
by induction n; simp [*, succ_smul', succ_mul]
theorem count_pos {a : α} {s : multiset α} : 0 < count a s ↔ a ∈ s :=
by simp [count, countp_pos]
@[simp] theorem count_eq_zero_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : multiset α} (h : a ∉ s) : count a s = 0 :=
by_contradiction $ λ h', h $ count_pos.1 (nat.pos_of_ne_zero h')
theorem count_eq_zero {a : α} {s : multiset α} : count a s = 0 ↔ a ∉ s :=
iff_not_comm.1 $ count_pos.symm.trans pos_iff_ne_zero
@[simp] theorem count_repeat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : count a (repeat a n) = n :=
by simp [repeat]
@[simp] theorem count_erase_self (a : α) (s : multiset α) : count a (erase s a) = pred (count a s) :=
begin
by_cases a ∈ s,
{ rw [(by rw cons_erase h : count a s = count a (a::erase s a)),
count_cons_self]; refl },
{ rw [erase_of_not_mem h, count_eq_zero.2 h]; refl }
end
@[simp] theorem count_erase_of_ne {a b : α} (ab : a ≠ b) (s : multiset α) : count a (erase s b) = count a s :=
begin
by_cases b ∈ s,
{ rw [← count_cons_of_ne ab, cons_erase h] },
{ rw [erase_of_not_mem h] }
end
@[simp] theorem count_sub (a : α) (s t : multiset α) : count a (s - t) = count a s - count a t :=
begin
revert s, refine multiset.induction_on t (by simp) (λ b t IH s, _),
rw [sub_cons, IH],
by_cases ab : a = b,
{ subst b, rw [count_erase_self, count_cons_self, sub_succ, pred_sub] },
{ rw [count_erase_of_ne ab, count_cons_of_ne ab] }
end
@[simp] theorem count_union (a : α) (s t : multiset α) : count a (s ∪ t) = max (count a s) (count a t) :=
by simp [(∪), union, sub_add_eq_max, -add_comm]
@[simp] theorem count_inter (a : α) (s t : multiset α) : count a (s ∩ t) = min (count a s) (count a t) :=
begin
apply @nat.add_left_cancel (count a (s - t)),
rw [← count_add, sub_add_inter, count_sub, sub_add_min],
end
lemma count_bind {m : multiset β} {f : β → multiset α} {a : α} :
count a (bind m f) = sum (m.map $ λb, count a $ f b) :=
multiset.induction_on m (by simp) (by simp)
theorem le_count_iff_repeat_le {a : α} {s : multiset α} {n : ℕ} : n ≤ count a s ↔ repeat a n ≤ s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, le_count_iff_repeat_sublist.trans repeat_le_coe.symm
@[simp] theorem count_filter {p} [decidable_pred p]
{a} {s : multiset α} (h : p a) : count a (filter p s) = count a s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, count_filter h
theorem ext {s t : multiset α} : s = t ↔ ∀ a, count a s = count a t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, quotient.eq.trans perm_iff_count
@[extensionality]
theorem ext' {s t : multiset α} : (∀ a, count a s = count a t) → s = t :=
ext.2
theorem le_iff_count {s t : multiset α} : s ≤ t ↔ ∀ a, count a s ≤ count a t :=
⟨λ h a, count_le_of_le a h, λ al,
by rw ← (ext.2 (λ a, by simp [max_eq_right (al a)]) : s ∪ t = t);
apply le_union_left⟩
instance : distrib_lattice (multiset α) :=
{ le_sup_inf := λ s t u, le_of_eq $ eq.symm $
ext.2 $ λ a, by simp [max_min_distrib_left],
..multiset.lattice.lattice }
instance : semilattice_sup_bot (multiset α) :=
{ bot := 0,
bot_le := zero_le,
..multiset.lattice.lattice }
end
/- relator -/
section rel
/-- `rel r s t` -- lift the relation `r` between two elements to a relation between `s` and `t`,
s.t. there is a one-to-one mapping betweem elements in `s` and `t` following `r`. -/
inductive rel (r : α → β → Prop) : multiset α → multiset β → Prop
| zero {} : rel 0 0
| cons {a b as bs} : r a b → rel as bs → rel (a :: as) (b :: bs)
run_cmd tactic.mk_iff_of_inductive_prop `multiset.rel `multiset.rel_iff
variables {δ : Type*} {r : α → β → Prop} {p : γ → δ → Prop}
private lemma rel_flip_aux {s t} (h : rel r s t) : rel (flip r) t s :=
rel.rec_on h rel.zero (assume _ _ _ _ h₀ h₁ ih, rel.cons h₀ ih)
lemma rel_flip {s t} : rel (flip r) s t ↔ rel r t s :=
⟨rel_flip_aux, rel_flip_aux⟩
lemma rel_eq_refl {s : multiset α} : rel (=) s s :=
multiset.induction_on s rel.zero (assume a s, rel.cons rfl)
lemma rel_eq {s t : multiset α} : rel (=) s t ↔ s = t :=
begin
split,
{ assume h, induction h; simp * },
{ assume h, subst h, exact rel_eq_refl }
end
lemma rel.mono {p : α → β → Prop} {s t} (h : ∀a b, r a b → p a b) (hst : rel r s t) : rel p s t :=
begin
induction hst,
case rel.zero { exact rel.zero },
case rel.cons : a b s t hab hst ih { exact ih.cons (h a b hab) }
end
lemma rel.add {s t u v} (hst : rel r s t) (huv : rel r u v) : rel r (s + u) (t + v) :=
begin
induction hst,
case rel.zero { simpa using huv },
case rel.cons : a b s t hab hst ih { simpa using ih.cons hab }
end
lemma rel_flip_eq {s t : multiset α} : rel (λa b, b = a) s t ↔ s = t :=
show rel (flip (=)) s t ↔ s = t, by rw [rel_flip, rel_eq, eq_comm]
@[simp] lemma rel_zero_left {b : multiset β} : rel r 0 b ↔ b = 0 :=
by rw [rel_iff]; simp
@[simp] lemma rel_zero_right {a : multiset α} : rel r a 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
by rw [rel_iff]; simp
lemma rel_cons_left {a as bs} :
rel r (a :: as) bs ↔ (∃b bs', r a b ∧ rel r as bs' ∧ bs = b :: bs') :=
begin
split,
{ generalize hm : a :: as = m,
assume h,
induction h generalizing as,
case rel.zero { simp at hm, contradiction },
case rel.cons : a' b as' bs ha'b h ih {
rcases cons_eq_cons.1 hm with ⟨eq₁, eq₂⟩ | ⟨h, cs, eq₁, eq₂⟩,
{ subst eq₁, subst eq₂, exact ⟨b, bs, ha'b, h, rfl⟩ },
{ rcases ih eq₂.symm with ⟨b', bs', h₁, h₂, eq⟩,
exact ⟨b', b::bs', h₁, eq₁.symm ▸ rel.cons ha'b h₂, eq.symm ▸ cons_swap _ _ _⟩ }
} },
{ exact assume ⟨b, bs', hab, h, eq⟩, eq.symm ▸ rel.cons hab h }
end
lemma rel_cons_right {as b bs} :
rel r as (b :: bs) ↔ (∃a as', r a b ∧ rel r as' bs ∧ as = a :: as') :=
begin
rw [← rel_flip, rel_cons_left],
apply exists_congr, assume a,
apply exists_congr, assume as',
rw [rel_flip, flip]
end
lemma rel_add_left {as₀ as₁} :
∀{bs}, rel r (as₀ + as₁) bs ↔ (∃bs₀ bs₁, rel r as₀ bs₀ ∧ rel r as₁ bs₁ ∧ bs = bs₀ + bs₁) :=
multiset.induction_on as₀ (by simp)
begin
assume a s ih bs,
simp only [ih, cons_add, rel_cons_left],
split,
{ assume h,
rcases h with ⟨b, bs', hab, h, rfl⟩,
rcases h with ⟨bs₀, bs₁, h₀, h₁, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨b :: bs₀, bs₁, ⟨b, bs₀, hab, h₀, rfl⟩, h₁, by simp⟩ },
{ assume h,
rcases h with ⟨bs₀, bs₁, h, h₁, rfl⟩,
rcases h with ⟨b, bs, hab, h₀, rfl⟩,
exact ⟨b, bs + bs₁, hab, ⟨bs, bs₁, h₀, h₁, rfl⟩, by simp⟩ }
end
lemma rel_add_right {as bs₀ bs₁} :
rel r as (bs₀ + bs₁) ↔ (∃as₀ as₁, rel r as₀ bs₀ ∧ rel r as₁ bs₁ ∧ as = as₀ + as₁) :=
by rw [← rel_flip, rel_add_left]; simp [rel_flip]
lemma rel_map_left {s : multiset γ} {f : γ → α} :
∀{t}, rel r (s.map f) t ↔ rel (λa b, r (f a) b) s t :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp) (by simp [rel_cons_left] {contextual := tt})
lemma rel_map_right {s : multiset α} {t : multiset γ} {f : γ → β} :
rel r s (t.map f) ↔ rel (λa b, r a (f b)) s t :=
by rw [← rel_flip, rel_map_left, ← rel_flip]; refl
lemma rel_join {s t} (h : rel (rel r) s t) : rel r s.join t.join :=
begin
induction h,
case rel.zero { simp },
case rel.cons : a b s t hab hst ih { simpa using hab.add ih }
end
lemma rel_map {p : γ → δ → Prop} {s t} {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} (h : (r ⇒ p) f g) (hst : rel r s t) :
rel p (s.map f) (t.map g) :=
by rw [rel_map_left, rel_map_right]; exact hst.mono (assume a b, h)
lemma rel_bind {p : γ → δ → Prop} {s t} {f : α → multiset γ} {g : β → multiset δ}
(h : (r ⇒ rel p) f g) (hst : rel r s t) :
rel p (s.bind f) (t.bind g) :=
by apply rel_join; apply rel_map; assumption
lemma card_eq_card_of_rel {r : α → β → Prop} {s : multiset α} {t : multiset β} (h : rel r s t) :
card s = card t :=
by induction h; simp [*]
end rel
/- disjoint -/
/-- `disjoint s t` means that `s` and `t` have no elements in common. -/
def disjoint (s t : multiset α) : Prop := ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∈ t → false
@[simp] theorem coe_disjoint (l₁ l₂ : list α) : @disjoint α l₁ l₂ ↔ l₁.disjoint l₂ := iff.rfl
theorem disjoint.symm {s t : multiset α} (d : disjoint s t) : disjoint t s
| a i₂ i₁ := d i₁ i₂
@[simp] theorem disjoint_comm {s t : multiset α} : disjoint s t ↔ disjoint t s :=
⟨disjoint.symm, disjoint.symm⟩
theorem disjoint_left {s t : multiset α} : disjoint s t ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ s → a ∉ t := iff.rfl
theorem disjoint_right {s t : multiset α} : disjoint s t ↔ ∀ {a}, a ∈ t → a ∉ s :=
disjoint_comm
theorem disjoint_iff_ne {s t : multiset α} : disjoint s t ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ≠ b :=
by simp [disjoint_left, imp_not_comm]
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left {s t u : multiset α} (h : s ⊆ u) (d : disjoint u t) : disjoint s t
| x m₁ := d (h m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right {s t u : multiset α} (h : t ⊆ u) (d : disjoint s u) : disjoint s t
| x m m₁ := d m (h m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_le_left {s t u : multiset α} (h : s ≤ u) : disjoint u t → disjoint s t :=
disjoint_of_subset_left (subset_of_le h)
theorem disjoint_of_le_right {s t u : multiset α} (h : t ≤ u) : disjoint s u → disjoint s t :=
disjoint_of_subset_right (subset_of_le h)
@[simp] theorem zero_disjoint (l : multiset α) : disjoint 0 l
| a := (not_mem_nil a).elim
@[simp] theorem singleton_disjoint {l : multiset α} {a : α} : disjoint (a::0) l ↔ a ∉ l :=
by simp [disjoint]; refl
@[simp] theorem disjoint_singleton {l : multiset α} {a : α} : disjoint l (a::0) ↔ a ∉ l :=
by rw disjoint_comm; simp
@[simp] theorem disjoint_add_left {s t u : multiset α} :
disjoint (s + t) u ↔ disjoint s u ∧ disjoint t u :=
by simp [disjoint, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_add_right {s t u : multiset α} :
disjoint s (t + u) ↔ disjoint s t ∧ disjoint s u :=
disjoint_comm.trans $ by simp [disjoint_append_left]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_left {a : α} {s t : multiset α} :
disjoint (a::s) t ↔ a ∉ t ∧ disjoint s t :=
(@disjoint_add_left _ (a::0) s t).trans $ by simp
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_right {a : α} {s t : multiset α} :
disjoint s (a::t) ↔ a ∉ s ∧ disjoint s t :=
disjoint_comm.trans $ by simp [disjoint_cons_left]
theorem inter_eq_zero_iff_disjoint [decidable_eq α] {s t : multiset α} : s ∩ t = 0 ↔ disjoint s t :=
by rw ← subset_zero; simp [subset_iff, disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_union_left [decidable_eq α] {s t u : multiset α} :
disjoint (s ∪ t) u ↔ disjoint s u ∧ disjoint t u :=
by simp [disjoint, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_union_right [decidable_eq α] {s t u : multiset α} :
disjoint s (t ∪ u) ↔ disjoint s t ∧ disjoint s u :=
by simp [disjoint, or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib]
lemma disjoint_map_map {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} {s : multiset α} {t : multiset β} :
disjoint (s.map f) (t.map g) ↔ (∀a∈s, ∀b∈t, f a ≠ g b) :=
begin
simp [disjoint],
split,
from assume h a ha b hb eq, h _ ha rfl _ hb eq.symm,
from assume h c a ha eq₁ b hb eq₂, h _ ha _ hb (eq₂.symm ▸ eq₁)
end
/-- `pairwise r m` states that there exists a list of the elements s.t. `r` holds pairwise on this list. -/
def pairwise (r : α → α → Prop) (m : multiset α) : Prop :=
∃l:list α, m = l ∧ l.pairwise r
lemma pairwise_coe_iff_pairwise {r : α → α → Prop} (hr : symmetric r) {l : list α} :
multiset.pairwise r l ↔ l.pairwise r :=
iff.intro
(assume ⟨l', eq, h⟩, (list.perm_pairwise hr (quotient.exact eq)).2 h)
(assume h, ⟨l, rfl, h⟩)
/- nodup -/
/-- `nodup s` means that `s` has no duplicates, i.e. the multiplicity of
any element is at most 1. -/
def nodup (s : multiset α) : Prop :=
quot.lift_on s nodup (λ s t p, propext $ perm_nodup p)
@[simp] theorem coe_nodup {l : list α} : @nodup α l ↔ l.nodup := iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem forall_mem_ne {a : α} {l : list α} : (∀ (a' : α), a' ∈ l → ¬a = a') ↔ a ∉ l :=
⟨λ h m, h _ m rfl, λ h a' m e, h (e.symm ▸ m)⟩
@[simp] theorem nodup_zero : @nodup α 0 := pairwise.nil _
@[simp] theorem nodup_cons {a : α} {s : multiset α} : nodup (a::s) ↔ a ∉ s ∧ nodup s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, nodup_cons
theorem nodup_cons_of_nodup {a : α} {s : multiset α} (m : a ∉ s) (n : nodup s) : nodup (a::s) :=
nodup_cons.2 ⟨m, n⟩
theorem nodup_singleton : ∀ a : α, nodup (a::0) := nodup_singleton
theorem nodup_of_nodup_cons {a : α} {s : multiset α} (h : nodup (a::s)) : nodup s :=
(nodup_cons.1 h).2
theorem not_mem_of_nodup_cons {a : α} {s : multiset α} (h : nodup (a::s)) : a ∉ s :=
(nodup_cons.1 h).1
theorem nodup_of_le {s t : multiset α} (h : s ≤ t) : nodup t → nodup s :=
le_induction_on h $ λ l₁ l₂, nodup_of_sublist
theorem not_nodup_pair : ∀ a : α, ¬ nodup (a::a::0) := not_nodup_pair
theorem nodup_iff_le {s : multiset α} : nodup s ↔ ∀ a : α, ¬ a::a::0 ≤ s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, nodup_iff_sublist.trans $ forall_congr $ λ a,
not_congr (@repeat_le_coe _ a 2 _).symm
theorem nodup_iff_count_le_one [decidable_eq α] {s : multiset α} : nodup s ↔ ∀ a, count a s ≤ 1 :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, nodup_iff_count_le_one
@[simp] theorem count_eq_one_of_mem [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {s : multiset α}
(d : nodup s) (h : a ∈ s) : count a s = 1 :=
le_antisymm (nodup_iff_count_le_one.1 d a) (count_pos.2 h)
lemma pairwise_of_nodup {r : α → α → Prop} {s : multiset α} :
(∀a∈s, ∀b∈s, a ≠ b → r a b) → nodup s → pairwise r s :=
quotient.induction_on s $ assume l h hl, ⟨l, rfl, hl.imp_of_mem $ assume a b ha hb, h a ha b hb⟩
theorem nodup_add {s t : multiset α} : nodup (s + t) ↔ nodup s ∧ nodup t ∧ disjoint s t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, nodup_append
theorem disjoint_of_nodup_add {s t : multiset α} (d : nodup (s + t)) : disjoint s t :=
(nodup_add.1 d).2.2
theorem nodup_add_of_nodup {s t : multiset α} (d₁ : nodup s) (d₂ : nodup t) : nodup (s + t) ↔ disjoint s t :=
by simp [nodup_add, d₁, d₂]
theorem nodup_of_nodup_map (f : α → β) {s : multiset α} : nodup (map f s) → nodup s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, nodup_of_nodup_map f
theorem nodup_map_on {f : α → β} {s : multiset α} : (∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, f x = f y → x = y) →
nodup s → nodup (map f s) :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, nodup_map_on
theorem nodup_map {f : α → β} {s : multiset α} (hf : function.injective f) : nodup s → nodup (map f s) :=
nodup_map_on (λ x _ y _ h, hf h)
theorem nodup_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] {s} : nodup s → nodup (filter p s) :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, nodup_filter p
@[simp] theorem nodup_attach {s : multiset α} : nodup (attach s) ↔ nodup s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, nodup_attach
theorem nodup_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : Π a, p a → β} {s : multiset α} {H}
(hf : ∀ a ha b hb, f a ha = f b hb → a = b) : nodup s → nodup (pmap f s H) :=
quot.induction_on s (λ l H, nodup_pmap hf) H
instance nodup_decidable [decidable_eq α] (s : multiset α) : decidable (nodup s) :=
quotient.rec_on_subsingleton s $ λ l, l.nodup_decidable
theorem nodup_erase_eq_filter [decidable_eq α] (a : α) {s} : nodup s → s.erase a = filter (≠ a) s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l d, congr_arg coe $ nodup_erase_eq_filter a d
theorem nodup_erase_of_nodup [decidable_eq α] (a : α) {l} : nodup l → nodup (l.erase a) :=
nodup_of_le (erase_le _ _)
theorem mem_erase_iff_of_nodup [decidable_eq α] {a b : α} {l} (d : nodup l) :
a ∈ l.erase b ↔ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l :=
by rw nodup_erase_eq_filter b d; simp [and_comm]
theorem mem_erase_of_nodup [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {l} (h : nodup l) : a ∉ l.erase a :=
by rw mem_erase_iff_of_nodup h; simp
theorem nodup_product {s : multiset α} {t : multiset β} : nodup s → nodup t → nodup (product s t) :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂ d₁ d₂, by simp [nodup_product d₁ d₂]
theorem nodup_sigma {σ : α → Type*} {s : multiset α} {t : Π a, multiset (σ a)} :
nodup s → (∀ a, nodup (t a)) → nodup (s.sigma t) :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l₁,
let l₂ (a) : list (σ a) := classical.some (quotient.exists_rep (t a)) in
have t = λ a, l₂ a, from eq.symm $ funext $ λ a,
classical.some_spec (quotient.exists_rep (t a)),
by rw [this]; simpa using nodup_sigma
theorem nodup_filter_map (f : α → option β) {s : multiset α}
(H : ∀ (a a' : α) (b : β), b ∈ f a → b ∈ f a' → a = a') :
nodup s → nodup (filter_map f s) :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, nodup_filter_map H
theorem nodup_range (n : ℕ) : nodup (range n) := nodup_range _
theorem nodup_inter_left [decidable_eq α] {s : multiset α} (t) : nodup s → nodup (s ∩ t) :=
nodup_of_le $ inter_le_left _ _
theorem nodup_inter_right [decidable_eq α] (s) {t : multiset α} : nodup t → nodup (s ∩ t) :=
nodup_of_le $ inter_le_right _ _
@[simp] theorem nodup_union [decidable_eq α] {s t : multiset α} : nodup (s ∪ t) ↔ nodup s ∧ nodup t :=
⟨λ h, ⟨nodup_of_le (le_union_left _ _) h, nodup_of_le (le_union_right _ _) h⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, nodup_iff_count_le_one.2 $ λ a, by rw [count_union]; exact
max_le (nodup_iff_count_le_one.1 h₁ a) (nodup_iff_count_le_one.1 h₂ a)⟩
@[simp] theorem nodup_powerset {s : multiset α} : nodup (powerset s) ↔ nodup s :=
⟨λ h, nodup_of_nodup_map _ (nodup_of_le (map_single_le_powerset _) h),
quotient.induction_on s $ λ l h,
by simp; refine list.nodup_map_on _ (nodup_sublists'.2 h); exact
λ x sx y sy e,
(perm_ext_sublist_nodup h (mem_sublists'.1 sx) (mem_sublists'.1 sy)).1
(quotient.exact e)⟩
@[simp] lemma nodup_bind {s : multiset α} {t : α → multiset β} :
nodup (bind s t) ↔ ((∀a∈s, nodup (t a)) ∧ (s.pairwise (λa b, disjoint (t a) (t b)))) :=
have h₁ : ∀a, ∃l:list β, t a = l, from
assume a, quot.induction_on (t a) $ assume l, ⟨l, rfl⟩,
let ⟨t', h'⟩ := classical.axiom_of_choice h₁ in
have t = λa, t' a, from funext h',
have hd : symmetric (λa b, list.disjoint (t' a) (t' b)), from assume a b h, h.symm,
quot.induction_on s $ by simp [this, list.nodup_bind, pairwise_coe_iff_pairwise hd]
theorem nodup_ext {s t : multiset α} : nodup s → nodup t → (s = t ↔ ∀ a, a ∈ s ↔ a ∈ t) :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂ d₁ d₂, quotient.eq.trans $ perm_ext d₁ d₂
theorem le_iff_subset {s t : multiset α} : nodup s → (s ≤ t ↔ s ⊆ t) :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂ d, ⟨subset_of_le, subperm_of_subset_nodup d⟩
theorem range_le {m n : ℕ} : range m ≤ range n ↔ m ≤ n :=
(le_iff_subset (nodup_range _)).trans range_subset
theorem mem_sub_of_nodup [decidable_eq α] {a : α} {s t : multiset α} (d : nodup s) :
a ∈ s - t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ a ∉ t :=
⟨λ h, ⟨mem_of_le (sub_le_self _ _) h, λ h',
by refine count_eq_zero.1 _ h; rw [count_sub a s t, nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le];
exact le_trans (nodup_iff_count_le_one.1 d _) (count_pos.2 h')⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, or.resolve_right (mem_add.1 $ mem_of_le (le_sub_add _ _) h₁) h₂⟩
section
variable [decidable_eq α]
/- erase_dup -/
/-- `erase_dup s` removes duplicates from `s`, yielding a `nodup` multiset. -/
def erase_dup (s : multiset α) : multiset α :=
quot.lift_on s (λ l, (l.erase_dup : multiset α))
(λ s t p, quot.sound (perm_erase_dup_of_perm p))
@[simp] theorem coe_erase_dup (l : list α) : @erase_dup α _ l = l.erase_dup := rfl
@[simp] theorem erase_dup_zero : @erase_dup α _ 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_erase_dup {a : α} {s : multiset α} : a ∈ erase_dup s ↔ a ∈ s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, mem_erase_dup
@[simp] theorem erase_dup_cons_of_mem {a : α} {s : multiset α} : a ∈ s →
erase_dup (a::s) = erase_dup s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l m, @congr_arg _ _ _ _ coe $ erase_dup_cons_of_mem m
@[simp] theorem erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : multiset α} : a ∉ s →
erase_dup (a::s) = a :: erase_dup s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l m, congr_arg coe $ erase_dup_cons_of_not_mem m
theorem erase_dup_le (s : multiset α) : erase_dup s ≤ s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, subperm_of_sublist $ erase_dup_sublist _
theorem erase_dup_subset (s : multiset α) : erase_dup s ⊆ s :=
subset_of_le $ erase_dup_le _
theorem subset_erase_dup (s : multiset α) : s ⊆ erase_dup s :=
λ a, mem_erase_dup.2
@[simp] theorem erase_dup_subset' {s t : multiset α} : erase_dup s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨subset.trans (subset_erase_dup _), subset.trans (erase_dup_subset _)⟩
@[simp] theorem subset_erase_dup' {s t : multiset α} : s ⊆ erase_dup t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨λ h, subset.trans h (erase_dup_subset _), λ h, subset.trans h (subset_erase_dup _)⟩
@[simp] theorem nodup_erase_dup (s : multiset α) : nodup (erase_dup s) :=
quot.induction_on s nodup_erase_dup
theorem erase_dup_eq_self {s : multiset α} : erase_dup s = s ↔ nodup s :=
⟨λ e, e ▸ nodup_erase_dup s,
quot.induction_on s $ λ l h, congr_arg coe $ erase_dup_eq_self.2 h⟩
@[simp] theorem erase_dup_singleton {a : α} : erase_dup (a :: 0) = a :: 0 :=
erase_dup_eq_self.2 $ nodup_singleton _
theorem le_erase_dup {s t : multiset α} : s ≤ erase_dup t ↔ s ≤ t ∧ nodup s :=
⟨λ h, ⟨le_trans h (erase_dup_le _), nodup_of_le h (nodup_erase_dup _)⟩,
λ ⟨l, d⟩, (le_iff_subset d).2 $ subset.trans (subset_of_le l) (subset_erase_dup _)⟩
theorem erase_dup_ext {s t : multiset α} : erase_dup s = erase_dup t ↔ ∀ a, a ∈ s ↔ a ∈ t :=
by simp [nodup_ext]
theorem erase_dup_map_erase_dup_eq [decidable_eq β] (f : α → β) (s : multiset α) :
erase_dup (map f (erase_dup s)) = erase_dup (map f s) := by simp [erase_dup_ext]
/- finset insert -/
/-- `ndinsert a s` is the lift of the list `insert` operation. This operation
does not respect multiplicities, unlike `cons`, but it is suitable as
an insert operation on `finset`. -/
def ndinsert (a : α) (s : multiset α) : multiset α :=
quot.lift_on s (λ l, (l.insert a : multiset α))
(λ s t p, quot.sound (perm_insert a p))
@[simp] theorem coe_ndinsert (a : α) (l : list α) : ndinsert a l = (insert a l : list α) := rfl
@[simp] theorem ndinsert_zero (a : α) : ndinsert a 0 = a::0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem ndinsert_of_mem {a : α} {s : multiset α} : a ∈ s → ndinsert a s = s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l h, congr_arg coe $ insert_of_mem h
@[simp] theorem ndinsert_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : multiset α} : a ∉ s → ndinsert a s = a :: s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l h, congr_arg coe $ insert_of_not_mem h
@[simp] theorem mem_ndinsert {a b : α} {s : multiset α} : a ∈ ndinsert b s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, mem_insert_iff
@[simp] theorem le_ndinsert_self (a : α) (s : multiset α) : s ≤ ndinsert a s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, subperm_of_sublist $ sublist_of_suffix $ suffix_insert _ _
@[simp] theorem mem_ndinsert_self (a : α) (s : multiset α) : a ∈ ndinsert a s :=
mem_ndinsert.2 (or.inl rfl)
@[simp] theorem mem_ndinsert_of_mem {a b : α} {s : multiset α} (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ ndinsert b s :=
mem_ndinsert.2 (or.inr h)
@[simp] theorem length_ndinsert_of_mem {a : α} [decidable_eq α] {s : multiset α} (h : a ∈ s) :
card (ndinsert a s) = card s :=
by simp [h]
@[simp] theorem length_ndinsert_of_not_mem {a : α} [decidable_eq α] {s : multiset α} (h : a ∉ s) :
card (ndinsert a s) = card s + 1 :=
by simp [h]
theorem erase_dup_cons {a : α} {s : multiset α} :
erase_dup (a::s) = ndinsert a (erase_dup s) :=
by by_cases a ∈ s; simp [h]
theorem nodup_ndinsert (a : α) {s : multiset α} : nodup s → nodup (ndinsert a s) :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, nodup_insert
theorem ndinsert_le {a : α} {s t : multiset α} : ndinsert a s ≤ t ↔ s ≤ t ∧ a ∈ t :=
⟨λ h, ⟨le_trans (le_ndinsert_self _ _) h, mem_of_le h (mem_ndinsert_self _ _)⟩,
λ ⟨l, m⟩, if h : a ∈ s then by simp [h, l] else
by rw [ndinsert_of_not_mem h, ← cons_erase m, cons_le_cons_iff,
← le_cons_of_not_mem h, cons_erase m]; exact l⟩
lemma attach_ndinsert (a : α) (s : multiset α) :
(s.ndinsert a).attach =
ndinsert ⟨a, mem_ndinsert_self a s⟩ (s.attach.map $ λp, ⟨p.1, mem_ndinsert_of_mem p.2⟩) :=
have eq : ∀h : ∀(p : {x // x ∈ s}), p.1 ∈ s,
(λ (p : {x // x ∈ s}), ⟨p.val, h p⟩ : {x // x ∈ s} → {x // x ∈ s}) = id, from
assume h, funext $ assume p, subtype.eq rfl,
have ∀t (eq : s.ndinsert a = t), t.attach = ndinsert ⟨a, eq ▸ mem_ndinsert_self a s⟩
(s.attach.map $ λp, ⟨p.1, eq ▸ mem_ndinsert_of_mem p.2⟩),
begin
intros t ht,
by_cases a ∈ s,
{ rw [ndinsert_of_mem h] at ht,
subst ht,
rw [eq, map_id, ndinsert_of_mem (mem_attach _ _)] },
{ rw [ndinsert_of_not_mem h] at ht,
subst ht,
simp [attach_cons, h] }
end,
this _ rfl
@[simp] theorem disjoint_ndinsert_left {a : α} {s t : multiset α} :
disjoint (ndinsert a s) t ↔ a ∉ t ∧ disjoint s t :=
iff.trans (by simp [disjoint]) disjoint_cons_left
@[simp] theorem disjoint_ndinsert_right {a : α} {s t : multiset α} :
disjoint s (ndinsert a t) ↔ a ∉ s ∧ disjoint s t :=
disjoint_comm.trans $ by simp
/- finset union -/
/-- `ndunion s t` is the lift of the list `union` operation. This operation
does not respect multiplicities, unlike `s ∪ t`, but it is suitable as
a union operation on `finset`. (`s ∪ t` would also work as a union operation
on finset, but this is more efficient.) -/
def ndunion (s t : multiset α) : multiset α :=
quotient.lift_on₂ s t (λ l₁ l₂, (l₁.union l₂ : multiset α)) $ λ v₁ v₂ w₁ w₂ p₁ p₂,
quot.sound $ perm_union p₁ p₂
@[simp] theorem coe_ndunion (l₁ l₂ : list α) : @ndunion α _ l₁ l₂ = (l₁ ∪ l₂ : list α) := rfl
@[simp] theorem zero_ndunion (s : multiset α) : ndunion 0 s = s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_ndunion (s t : multiset α) (a : α) : ndunion (a :: s) t = ndinsert a (ndunion s t) :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_ndunion {s t : multiset α} {a : α} : a ∈ ndunion s t ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, list.mem_union
theorem le_ndunion_right (s t : multiset α) : t ≤ ndunion s t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂,
subperm_of_sublist $ sublist_of_suffix $ suffix_union_right _ _
theorem ndunion_le_add (s t : multiset α) : ndunion s t ≤ s + t :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, subperm_of_sublist $ union_sublist_append _ _
theorem ndunion_le {s t u : multiset α} : ndunion s t ≤ u ↔ s ⊆ u ∧ t ≤ u :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp) (by simp [ndinsert_le, and_comm, and.left_comm] {contextual := tt})
theorem subset_ndunion_left (s t : multiset α) : s ⊆ ndunion s t :=
λ a h, mem_ndunion.2 $ or.inl h
theorem le_ndunion_left {s} (t : multiset α) (d : nodup s) : s ≤ ndunion s t :=
(le_iff_subset d).2 $ subset_ndunion_left _ _
theorem ndunion_le_union (s t : multiset α) : ndunion s t ≤ s ∪ t :=
ndunion_le.2 ⟨subset_of_le (le_union_left _ _), le_union_right _ _⟩
theorem nodup_ndunion (s : multiset α) {t : multiset α} : nodup t → nodup (ndunion s t) :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, list.nodup_union _
@[simp] theorem ndunion_eq_union {s t : multiset α} (d : nodup s) : ndunion s t = s ∪ t :=
le_antisymm (ndunion_le_union _ _) $ union_le (le_ndunion_left _ d) (le_ndunion_right _ _)
theorem erase_dup_add (s t : multiset α) : erase_dup (s + t) = ndunion s (erase_dup t) :=
quotient.induction_on₂ s t $ λ l₁ l₂, congr_arg coe $ erase_dup_append _ _
/- finset inter -/
/-- `ndinter s t` is the lift of the list `∩` operation. This operation
does not respect multiplicities, unlike `s ∩ t`, but it is suitable as
an intersection operation on `finset`. (`s ∩ t` would also work as a union operation
on finset, but this is more efficient.) -/
def ndinter (s t : multiset α) : multiset α := filter (∈ t) s
@[simp] theorem coe_ndinter (l₁ l₂ : list α) : @ndinter α _ l₁ l₂ = (l₁ ∩ l₂ : list α) := rfl
@[simp] theorem zero_ndinter (s : multiset α) : ndinter 0 s = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_ndinter_of_mem {a : α} (s : multiset α) {t : multiset α} (h : a ∈ t) :
ndinter (a::s) t = a :: (ndinter s t) := by simp [ndinter, h]
@[simp] theorem ndinter_cons_of_not_mem {a : α} (s : multiset α) {t : multiset α} (h : a ∉ t) :
ndinter (a::s) t = ndinter s t := by simp [ndinter, h]
@[simp] theorem mem_ndinter {s t : multiset α} {a : α} : a ∈ ndinter s t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t :=
mem_filter
theorem nodup_ndinter {s : multiset α} (t : multiset α) : nodup s → nodup (ndinter s t) :=
nodup_filter _
theorem le_ndinter {s t u : multiset α} : s ≤ ndinter t u ↔ s ≤ t ∧ s ⊆ u :=
by simp [ndinter, le_filter, subset_iff]
theorem ndinter_le_left (s t : multiset α) : ndinter s t ≤ s :=
(le_ndinter.1 (le_refl _)).1
theorem ndinter_subset_right (s t : multiset α) : ndinter s t ⊆ t :=
(le_ndinter.1 (le_refl _)).2
theorem ndinter_le_right {s} (t : multiset α) (d : nodup s) : ndinter s t ≤ t :=
(le_iff_subset $ nodup_ndinter _ d).2 (ndinter_subset_right _ _)
theorem inter_le_ndinter (s t : multiset α) : s ∩ t ≤ ndinter s t :=
le_ndinter.2 ⟨inter_le_left _ _, subset_of_le $ inter_le_right _ _⟩
@[simp] theorem ndinter_eq_inter {s t : multiset α} (d : nodup s) : ndinter s t = s ∩ t :=
le_antisymm (le_inter (ndinter_le_left _ _) (ndinter_le_right _ d)) (inter_le_ndinter _ _)
theorem ndinter_eq_zero_iff_disjoint {s t : multiset α} : ndinter s t = 0 ↔ disjoint s t :=
by rw ← subset_zero; simp [subset_iff, disjoint]
end
/- fold -/
section fold
variables (op : α → α → α) [hc : is_commutative α op] [ha : is_associative α op]
local notation a * b := op a b
include hc ha
/-- `fold op b s` folds a commutative associative operation `op` over
the multiset `s`. -/
def fold : α → multiset α → α := foldr op (left_comm _ hc.comm ha.assoc)
theorem fold_eq_foldr (b : α) (s : multiset α) : fold op b s = foldr op (left_comm _ hc.comm ha.assoc) b s := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_fold_r (b : α) (l : list α) : fold op b l = l.foldr op b := rfl
theorem coe_fold_l (b : α) (l : list α) : fold op b l = l.foldl op b :=
(coe_foldr_swap op _ b l).trans $ by simp [hc.comm]
theorem fold_eq_foldl (b : α) (s : multiset α) : fold op b s = foldl op (right_comm _ hc.comm ha.assoc) b s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, coe_fold_l _ _ _
@[simp] theorem fold_zero (b : α) : (0 : multiset α).fold op b = b := rfl
@[simp] theorem fold_cons_left : ∀ (b a : α) (s : multiset α),
(a :: s).fold op b = a * s.fold op b := foldr_cons _ _
theorem fold_cons_right (b a : α) (s : multiset α) : (a :: s).fold op b = s.fold op b * a :=
by simp [hc.comm]
theorem fold_cons'_right (b a : α) (s : multiset α) : (a :: s).fold op b = s.fold op (b * a) :=
by rw [fold_eq_foldl, foldl_cons, ← fold_eq_foldl]
theorem fold_cons'_left (b a : α) (s : multiset α) : (a :: s).fold op b = s.fold op (a * b) :=
by rw [fold_cons'_right, hc.comm]
theorem fold_add (b₁ b₂ : α) (s₁ s₂ : multiset α) : (s₁ + s₂).fold op (b₁ * b₂) = s₁.fold op b₁ * s₂.fold op b₂ :=
multiset.induction_on s₂
(by rw [add_zero, fold_zero, ← fold_cons'_right, ← fold_cons_right op])
(by simp {contextual := tt}; cc)
theorem fold_singleton (b a : α) : (a::0 : multiset α).fold op b = a * b := by simp
theorem fold_distrib {f g : β → α} (u₁ u₂ : α) (s : multiset β) :
(s.map (λx, f x * g x)).fold op (u₁ * u₂) = (s.map f).fold op u₁ * (s.map g).fold op u₂ :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp) (by simp {contextual := tt}; cc)
theorem fold_hom {op' : β → β → β} [is_commutative β op'] [is_associative β op']
{m : α → β} (hm : ∀x y, m (op x y) = op' (m x) (m y)) (b : α) (s : multiset α) :
(s.map m).fold op' (m b) = m (s.fold op b) :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp) (by simp [hm] {contextual := tt})
theorem fold_union_inter [decidable_eq α] (s₁ s₂ : multiset α) (b₁ b₂ : α) :
(s₁ ∪ s₂).fold op b₁ * (s₁ ∩ s₂).fold op b₂ = s₁.fold op b₁ * s₂.fold op b₂ :=
by rw [← fold_add op, union_add_inter, fold_add op]
@[simp] theorem fold_erase_dup_idem [decidable_eq α] [hi : is_idempotent α op] (s : multiset α) (b : α) :
(erase_dup s).fold op b = s.fold op b :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp) $ λ a s IH, begin
by_cases a ∈ s; simp [IH, h],
show fold op b s = op a (fold op b s),
rw [← cons_erase h, fold_cons_left, ← ha.assoc, hi.idempotent],
end
end fold
theorem le_smul_erase_dup [decidable_eq α] (s : multiset α) :
∃ n : ℕ, s ≤ n • erase_dup s :=
⟨(s.map (λ a, count a s)).fold max 0, le_iff_count.2 $ λ a, begin
rw count_smul, by_cases a ∈ s,
{ refine le_trans _ (mul_le_mul_left _ $ count_pos.2 $ mem_erase_dup.2 h),
have : count a s ≤ fold max 0 (map (λ a, count a s) (a :: erase s a));
[simp [le_max_left], simpa [cons_erase h]] },
{ simp [count_eq_zero.2 h, nat.zero_le] }
end⟩
section sup
variables [semilattice_sup_bot α]
/-- Supremum of a multiset: `sup {a, b, c} = a ⊔ b ⊔ c` -/
def sup (s : multiset α) : α := s.fold (⊔) ⊥
@[simp] lemma sup_zero : (0 : multiset α).sup = ⊥ :=
fold_zero _ _
@[simp] lemma sup_cons (a : α) (s : multiset α) :
(a :: s).sup = a ⊔ s.sup :=
fold_cons_left _ _ _ _
@[simp] lemma sup_singleton {a : α} : (a::0).sup = a := by simp
@[simp] lemma sup_add (s₁ s₂ : multiset α) : (s₁ + s₂).sup = s₁.sup ⊔ s₂.sup :=
eq.trans (by simp [sup]) (fold_add _ _ _ _ _)
variables [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] lemma sup_erase_dup (s : multiset α) : (erase_dup s).sup = s.sup :=
fold_erase_dup_idem _ _ _
@[simp] lemma sup_ndunion (s₁ s₂ : multiset α) :
(ndunion s₁ s₂).sup = s₁.sup ⊔ s₂.sup :=
by rw [← sup_erase_dup, erase_dup_ext.2, sup_erase_dup, sup_add]; simp
@[simp] lemma sup_union (s₁ s₂ : multiset α) :
(s₁ ∪ s₂).sup = s₁.sup ⊔ s₂.sup :=
by rw [← sup_erase_dup, erase_dup_ext.2, sup_erase_dup, sup_add]; simp
@[simp] lemma sup_ndinsert (a : α) (s : multiset α) :
(ndinsert a s).sup = a ⊔ s.sup :=
by rw [← sup_erase_dup, erase_dup_ext.2, sup_erase_dup, sup_cons]; simp
lemma sup_le {s : multiset α} {a : α} : s.sup ≤ a ↔ (∀b ∈ s, b ≤ a) :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp)
(by simp [or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib] {contextual := tt})
lemma le_sup {s : multiset α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : a ≤ s.sup :=
sup_le.1 (le_refl _) _ h
lemma sup_mono {s₁ s₂ : multiset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁.sup ≤ s₂.sup :=
sup_le.2 $ assume b hb, le_sup (h hb)
end sup
section inf
variables [semilattice_inf_top α]
/-- Infimum of a multiset: `inf {a, b, c} = a ⊓ b ⊓ c` -/
def inf (s : multiset α) : α := s.fold (⊓) ⊤
@[simp] lemma inf_zero : (0 : multiset α).inf = ⊤ :=
fold_zero _ _
@[simp] lemma inf_cons (a : α) (s : multiset α) :
(a :: s).inf = a ⊓ s.inf :=
fold_cons_left _ _ _ _
@[simp] lemma inf_singleton {a : α} : (a::0).inf = a := by simp
@[simp] lemma inf_add (s₁ s₂ : multiset α) : (s₁ + s₂).inf = s₁.inf ⊓ s₂.inf :=
eq.trans (by simp [inf]) (fold_add _ _ _ _ _)
variables [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] lemma inf_erase_dup (s : multiset α) : (erase_dup s).inf = s.inf :=
fold_erase_dup_idem _ _ _
@[simp] lemma inf_ndunion (s₁ s₂ : multiset α) :
(ndunion s₁ s₂).inf = s₁.inf ⊓ s₂.inf :=
by rw [← inf_erase_dup, erase_dup_ext.2, inf_erase_dup, inf_add]; simp
@[simp] lemma inf_union (s₁ s₂ : multiset α) :
(s₁ ∪ s₂).inf = s₁.inf ⊓ s₂.inf :=
by rw [← inf_erase_dup, erase_dup_ext.2, inf_erase_dup, inf_add]; simp
@[simp] lemma inf_ndinsert (a : α) (s : multiset α) :
(ndinsert a s).inf = a ⊓ s.inf :=
by rw [← inf_erase_dup, erase_dup_ext.2, inf_erase_dup, inf_cons]; simp
lemma le_inf {s : multiset α} {a : α} : a ≤ s.inf ↔ (∀b ∈ s, a ≤ b) :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp)
(by simp [or_imp_distrib, forall_and_distrib] {contextual := tt})
lemma inf_le {s : multiset α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : s.inf ≤ a :=
le_inf.1 (le_refl _) _ h
lemma inf_mono {s₁ s₂ : multiset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₂.inf ≤ s₁.inf :=
le_inf.2 $ assume b hb, inf_le (h hb)
end inf
section sort
variables (r : α → α → Prop) [decidable_rel r]
[is_trans α r] [is_antisymm α r] [is_total α r]
/-- `sort s` constructs a sorted list from the multiset `s`.
(Uses merge sort algorithm.) -/
def sort (s : multiset α) : list α :=
quot.lift_on s (merge_sort r) $ λ a b h,
eq_of_sorted_of_perm
((perm_merge_sort _ _).trans $ h.trans (perm_merge_sort _ _).symm)
(sorted_merge_sort r _)
(sorted_merge_sort r _)
@[simp] theorem coe_sort (l : list α) : sort r l = merge_sort r l := rfl
@[simp] theorem sort_sorted (s : multiset α) : sorted r (sort r s) :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, sorted_merge_sort r _
@[simp] theorem sort_eq (s : multiset α) : ↑(sort r s) = s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, quot.sound $ perm_merge_sort _ _
@[simp] theorem mem_sort {s : multiset α} {a : α} : a ∈ sort r s ↔ a ∈ s :=
by rw [← mem_coe, sort_eq]
end sort
instance [has_repr α] : has_repr (multiset α) :=
⟨λ s, "{" ++ string.intercalate ", " ((s.map repr).sort (≤)) ++ "}"⟩
section sections
def sections (s : multiset (multiset α)) : multiset (multiset α) :=
multiset.rec_on s {0} (λs _ c, s.bind $ λa, c.map ((::) a))
(assume a₀ a₁ s pi, by simp [map_bind, bind_bind a₀ a₁, cons_swap])
@[simp] lemma sections_zero : sections (0 : multiset (multiset α)) = 0::0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma sections_cons (s : multiset (multiset α)) (m : multiset α) :
sections (m :: s) = m.bind (λa, (sections s).map ((::) a)) :=
rec_on_cons m s
lemma coe_sections : ∀(l : list (list α)),
sections ((l.map (λl:list α, (l : multiset α))) : multiset (multiset α)) =
((l.sections.map (λl:list α, (l : multiset α))) : multiset (multiset α))
| [] := rfl
| (a :: l) :=
begin
simp,
rw [← cons_coe, sections_cons, bind_map_comm, coe_sections l],
simp [list.sections, (∘), list.bind]
end
@[simp] lemma sections_add (s t : multiset (multiset α)) :
sections (s + t) = (sections s).bind (λm, (sections t).map ((+) m)) :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp)
(assume a s ih, by simp [ih, bind_assoc, map_bind, bind_map, -add_comm])
lemma mem_sections {s : multiset (multiset α)} :
∀{a}, a ∈ sections s ↔ s.rel (λs a, a ∈ s) a :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp)
(assume a s ih a',
by simp [ih, rel_cons_left, -exists_and_distrib_left, exists_and_distrib_left.symm, eq_comm])
lemma card_sections {s : multiset (multiset α)} : card (sections s) = prod (s.map card) :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp) (by simp {contextual := tt})
lemma prod_map_sum [comm_semiring α] {s : multiset (multiset α)} :
prod (s.map sum) = sum ((sections s).map prod) :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp)
(assume a s ih, by simp [ih, map_bind, sum_map_mul_left, sum_map_mul_right])
end sections
section pi
variables [decidable_eq α] {δ : α → Type*}
open function
def pi.cons (m : multiset α) (a : α) (b : δ a) (f : Πa∈m, δ a) : Πa'∈a::m, δ a' :=
λa' ha', if h : a' = a then eq.rec b h.symm else f a' $ (mem_cons.1 ha').resolve_left h
def pi.empty (δ : α → Type*) : (Πa∈(0:multiset α), δ a) .
lemma pi.cons_same {m : multiset α} {a : α} {b : δ a} {f : Πa∈m, δ a} (h : a ∈ a :: m) :
pi.cons m a b f a h = b :=
dif_pos rfl
lemma pi.cons_ne {m : multiset α} {a a' : α} {b : δ a} {f : Πa∈m, δ a} (h' : a' ∈ a :: m) (h : a' ≠ a) :
pi.cons m a b f a' h' = f a' ((mem_cons.1 h').resolve_left h) :=
dif_neg h
lemma pi.cons_swap {a a' : α} {b : δ a} {b' : δ a'} {m : multiset α} {f : Πa∈m, δ a} (h : a ≠ a') :
pi.cons (a' :: m) a b (pi.cons m a' b' f) == pi.cons (a :: m) a' b' (pi.cons m a b f) :=
begin
apply hfunext, { refl }, intros a'' _ h, subst h,
apply hfunext, { rw [cons_swap] }, intros ha₁ ha₂ h,
by_cases h₁ : a'' = a; by_cases h₂ : a'' = a';
simp [*, pi.cons_same, pi.cons_ne] at *,
{ subst h₁, rw [pi.cons_same, pi.cons_same] },
{ subst h₂, rw [pi.cons_same, pi.cons_same] }
end
/-- `pi m t` constructs the Cartesian product over `t` indexed by `m`. -/
def pi (m : multiset α) (t : Πa, multiset (δ a)) : multiset (Πa∈m, δ a) :=
m.rec_on {pi.empty δ} (λa m (p : multiset (Πa∈m, δ a)), (t a).bind $ λb, p.map $ pi.cons m a b)
begin
intros a a' m n,
by_cases eq : a = a',
{ subst eq },
{ simp [map_bind, bind_bind (t a') (t a)],
apply bind_hcongr, { rw [cons_swap a a'] },
intros b hb,
apply bind_hcongr, { rw [cons_swap a a'] },
intros b' hb',
apply map_hcongr, { rw [cons_swap a a'] },
intros f hf,
exact pi.cons_swap eq }
end
@[simp] lemma pi_zero (t : Πa, multiset (δ a)) : pi 0 t = pi.empty δ :: 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma pi_cons (m : multiset α) (t : Πa, multiset (δ a)) (a : α) :
pi (a :: m) t = ((t a).bind $ λb, (pi m t).map $ pi.cons m a b) :=
rec_on_cons a m
lemma injective_pi_cons {a : α} {b : δ a} {s : multiset α} (hs : a ∉ s) :
function.injective (pi.cons s a b) :=
assume f₁ f₂ eq, funext $ assume a', funext $ assume h',
have ne : a ≠ a', from assume h, hs $ h.symm ▸ h',
have a' ∈ a :: s, from mem_cons_of_mem h',
calc f₁ a' h' = pi.cons s a b f₁ a' this : by rw [pi.cons_ne this ne.symm]
... = pi.cons s a b f₂ a' this : by rw [eq]
... = f₂ a' h' : by rw [pi.cons_ne this ne.symm]
lemma card_pi (m : multiset α) (t : Πa, multiset (δ a)) :
card (pi m t) = prod (m.map $ λa, card (t a)) :=
multiset.induction_on m (by simp) (by simp [mul_comm] {contextual := tt})
lemma nodup_pi {s : multiset α} {t : Πa, multiset (δ a)} :
nodup s → (∀a∈s, nodup (t a)) → nodup (pi s t) :=
multiset.induction_on s (assume _ _, nodup_singleton _)
begin
assume a s ih hs ht,
have has : a ∉ s, by simp at hs; exact hs.1,
have hs : nodup s, by simp at hs; exact hs.2,
simp,
split,
{ assume b hb,
from nodup_map (injective_pi_cons has) (ih hs $ assume a' h', ht a' $ mem_cons_of_mem h') },
{ apply pairwise_of_nodup _ (ht a $ mem_cons_self _ _),
from assume b₁ hb₁ b₂ hb₂ neb, disjoint_map_map.2 (assume f hf g hg eq,
have pi.cons s a b₁ f a (mem_cons_self _ _) = pi.cons s a b₂ g a (mem_cons_self _ _),
by rw [eq],
neb $ show b₁ = b₂, by rwa [pi.cons_same, pi.cons_same] at this) }
end
lemma mem_pi (m : multiset α) (t : Πa, multiset (δ a)) :
∀f:Πa∈m, δ a, (f ∈ pi m t) ↔ (∀a (h : a ∈ m), f a h ∈ t a) :=
begin
refine multiset.induction_on m (λ f, _) (λ a m ih f, _),
{ simpa using show f = pi.empty δ, by funext a ha; exact ha.elim },
simp, split,
{ rintro ⟨b, hb, f', hf', rfl⟩ a' ha',
rw [ih] at hf',
by_cases a' = a,
{ subst h, rwa [pi.cons_same] },
{ rw [pi.cons_ne _ h], apply hf' } },
{ intro hf,
refine ⟨_, hf a (mem_cons_self a _), λa ha, f a (mem_cons_of_mem ha),
(ih _).2 (λ a' h', hf _ _), _⟩,
funext a' h',
by_cases a' = a,
{ subst h, rw [pi.cons_same] },
{ rw [pi.cons_ne _ h] } }
end
end pi
end multiset
namespace multiset
instance : functor multiset :=
{ map := @map }
instance : is_lawful_functor multiset :=
by refine { .. }; intros; simp
open is_lawful_traversable is_comm_applicative
variables {F : Type u_1 → Type u_1} [applicative F] [is_comm_applicative F]
variables {α' β' : Type u_1} (f : α' → F β')
lemma coe_append_eq_add_coe :
((∘) (coe : list β' → multiset β') ∘ append) = (λ x y, x + coe y) ∘ coe :=
by ext; simp
lemma coe_list_cons_eq_cons_coe :
flip ((∘) (coe : list β' → multiset β') ∘ @list.cons β') = flip multiset.cons ∘ (coe) :=
by ext; simp! [flip]
lemma coe_traverse_cons (x : α') (xs : list α') :
(coe : list β' → multiset β') <$> traverse f (x :: xs) =
coe <$> traverse f (xs ++ [x]) :=
begin
symmetry, simp! [traverse],
induction xs, refl,
simp! [traverse] with functor_norm,
rw [commutative_map,coe_list_cons_eq_cons_coe,comp_map,xs_ih],
rw [commutative_map], symmetry, rw [commutative_map],
simp with functor_norm, congr,
ext, simp! [flip], constructor
end
lemma coe_traverse_cons_swap (x x' : α') (xs : list α') :
(coe : list β' → multiset β') <$> traverse f (x :: x' :: xs) =
coe <$> traverse f (x' :: x :: xs : list α') :=
begin
simp! [traverse] with functor_norm,
rw commutative_map,
congr, ext, simp! [flip],
constructor
end
def traverse :
multiset α' → F (multiset β') :=
quotient.lift (functor.map coe ∘ traversable.traverse f)
begin
introv p, unfold function.comp,
induction p, refl,
{ simp [coe_traverse_cons,traverse_append] with functor_norm,
rw [coe_append_eq_add_coe,comp_map,p_ih],
simp! with functor_norm },
{ rw coe_traverse_cons_swap },
{ simp [*] }
end
open functor
open traversable is_lawful_traversable
@[simp]
lemma lift_beta {α β : Type*} (x : list α) (f : list α → β)
(h : ∀ a b : list α, a ≈ b → f a = f b) :
quotient.lift f h (x : multiset α) = f x :=
quotient.lift_beta _ _ _
@[simp]
lemma map_comp_coe {α β} (h : α → β) :
functor.map h ∘ coe = (coe ∘ functor.map h : list α → multiset β) :=
by funext; simp [functor.map]
lemma id_traverse {α : Type*} (x : multiset α) :
traverse id.mk x = x :=
quotient.induction_on x
(by { intro, rw [traverse,quotient.lift_beta,function.comp],
simp, congr })
lemma comp_traverse {G H : Type* → Type*}
[applicative G] [applicative H]
[is_comm_applicative G] [is_comm_applicative H]
{α β γ : Type*}
(g : α → G β) (h : β → H γ) (x : multiset α) :
traverse (comp.mk ∘ functor.map h ∘ g) x =
comp.mk (functor.map (traverse h) (traverse g x)) :=
quotient.induction_on x
(by intro;
simp [traverse,comp_traverse] with functor_norm;
simp [(<$>),(∘)] with functor_norm)
lemma map_traverse {G : Type* → Type*}
[applicative G] [is_comm_applicative G]
{α β γ : Type*}
(g : α → G β) (h : β → γ)
(x : multiset α) :
functor.map (functor.map h) (traverse g x) =
traverse (functor.map h ∘ g) x :=
quotient.induction_on x
(by intro; simp [traverse] with functor_norm;
rw [comp_map,map_traverse])
lemma traverse_map {G : Type* → Type*}
[applicative G] [is_comm_applicative G]
{α β γ : Type*}
(g : α → β) (h : β → G γ)
(x : multiset α) :
traverse h (map g x) =
traverse (h ∘ g) x :=
quotient.induction_on x
(by intro; simp [traverse];
rw [← traversable.traverse_map h g];
[ refl, apply_instance ])
lemma naturality {G H : Type* → Type*}
[applicative G] [applicative H]
[is_comm_applicative G] [is_comm_applicative H]
(eta : applicative_transformation G H)
{α β : Type*} (f : α → G β) (x : multiset α) :
eta (traverse f x) = traverse (@eta _ ∘ f) x :=
quotient.induction_on x
(by intro; simp [traverse,is_lawful_traversable.naturality] with functor_norm)
end multiset
|
bc81612f647995be49c93edfe37d9ce5db4797ec | 09b3e1beaeff2641ac75019c9f735d79d508071d | /Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Defs.lean | b27feb898ed38e03f8c98493ee78299b6e8df0e1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | abentkamp/mathlib4 | b819079cc46426b3c5c77413504b07541afacc19 | f8294a67548f8f3d1f5913677b070a2ef5bcf120 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,309,252,764 | 1,623,232,534,000 | 1,623,232,534,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,012 | lean | import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic -- *only* for notation ℕ which should be in a "prelude"
import Mathlib.Tactic.Spread
/-!
# Typeclasses for monoids and groups etc
-/
/-
## Stuff which was in core Lean 3
-- this should also be in a "prelude" -- it is not in mathlib3's algebra.group.defs
-/
class Zero (α : Type u) where
zero : α
instance [Zero α] : OfNat α (nat_lit 0) where
ofNat := Zero.zero
class One (α : Type u) where
one : α
instance [One α] : OfNat α (nat_lit 1) where
ofNat := One.one
class Inv (α : Type u) where
inv : α → α
postfix:max "⁻¹" => Inv.inv
/-
## The trick for adding a natural action onto monoids
-/
section nat_action
variable {M : Type u}
-- see npow_rec comment for explanation about why not nsmul_rec n a + a
/-- The fundamental scalar multiplication in an additive monoid. `nsmul_rec n a = a+a+...+a` n
times. Use instead `n • a`, which has better definitional behavior. -/
def nsmul_rec [Zero M] [Add M] : ℕ → M → M
| 0 , a => 0
| n+1, a => a + nsmul_rec n a
-- use `x * npow_rec n x` and not `npow_rec n x * x` in the definition to make sure that
-- definitional unfolding of `npow_rec` is blocked, to avoid deep recursion issues.
/-- The fundamental power operation in a monoid. `npow_rec n a = a*a*...*a` n times.
Use instead `a ^ n`, which has better definitional behavior. -/
def npow_rec [One M] [Mul M] : ℕ → M → M
| 0 , a => 1
| n+1, a => a * npow_rec n a
end nat_action
section int_action
-- TODO -- this should be in a prelude
notation "ℤ" => Int
/-- The fundamental scalar multiplication in an additive group. `gsmul_rec n a = a+a+...+a` n
times, for integer `n`. Use instead `n • a`, which has better definitional behavior. -/
def gsmul_rec {G : Type u} [Zero G] [Add G] [Neg G]: ℤ → G → G
| (Int.ofNat n) , a => nsmul_rec n a
| (Int.negSucc n), a => - (nsmul_rec n.succ a)
/-- The fundamental power operation in a group. `gpow_rec n a = a*a*...*a` n times, for integer `n`.
Use instead `a ^ n`, which has better definitional behavior. -/
def gpow_rec {G : Type u} [One G] [Mul G] [Inv G] : ℤ → G → G
| (Int.ofNat n) , a => npow_rec n a
| (Int.negSucc n), a => (npow_rec n.succ a) ⁻¹
end int_action
/-
## Additive semigroups, monoids and groups
-/
/-
### Semigroups
-/
class AddSemigroup (A : Type u) extends Add A where
add_assoc (a b c : A) : (a + b) + c = a + (b + c)
theorem add_assoc {G : Type u} [AddSemigroup G] :
∀ a b c : G, (a + b) + c = a + (b + c) :=
AddSemigroup.add_assoc
class AddCommSemigroup (A : Type u) extends AddSemigroup A where
add_comm (a b : A) : a + b = b + a
theorem add_comm {A : Type u} [AddCommSemigroup A] (a b : A) : a + b = b + a :=
AddCommSemigroup.add_comm a b
/-
### Cancellative semigroups
-/
class IsAddLeftCancel (A : Type u) [Add A] where
add_left_cancel (a b c : A) : a + b = a + c → b = c
class IsAddRightCancel (A : Type u) [Add A] where
add_right_cancel (a b c : A) : b + a = c + a → b = c
section AddLeftCancel_lemmas
variable {A : Type u} [AddSemigroup A] [IsAddLeftCancel A] {a b c : A}
theorem add_left_cancel : a + b = a + c → b = c :=
IsAddLeftCancel.add_left_cancel a b c
theorem add_left_cancel_iff : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c :=
⟨add_left_cancel, congrArg _⟩
-- no `function.injective`?
--theorem add_right_injective (a : G) : function.injective (c * .) :=
--λ a b => add_left_cancel
@[simp] theorem add_right_inj (a : A) {b c : A} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c :=
⟨add_left_cancel, congrArg _⟩
--theorem add_ne_add_right (a : A) {b c : A} : a + b ≠ a + c ↔ b ≠ c :=
--(add_right_injective a).ne_iff
end AddLeftCancel_lemmas
section AddRightCancel_lemmas
variable {A : Type u} [AddSemigroup A] [IsAddRightCancel A] {a b c : A}
theorem add_right_cancel : b + a = c + a → b = c :=
IsAddRightCancel.add_right_cancel a b c
theorem add_right_cancel_iff : b + a = c + a ↔ b = c :=
⟨add_right_cancel, λ h => h ▸ rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem add_left_inj (a : A) {b c : A} : b + a = c + a ↔ b = c :=
⟨add_right_cancel, λ h => h ▸ rfl⟩
end AddRightCancel_lemmas
/-
### Additive monoids
-/
class AddMonoid (A : Type u) extends AddSemigroup A, Zero A where
add_zero (a : A) : a + 0 = a
zero_add (a : A) : 0 + a = a
nsmul : ℕ → A → A := nsmul_rec
nsmul_zero' : ∀ x, nsmul 0 x = 0 -- fill in with tactic once we can do this
nsmul_succ' : ∀ (n : ℕ) x, nsmul n.succ x = x + nsmul n x -- fill in with tactic
section AddMonoid_lemmas
variable {A : Type u} [AddMonoid A] {a b c : A}
@[simp] theorem add_zero (a : A) : a + 0 = a :=
AddMonoid.add_zero a
@[simp] theorem zero_add (a : A) : 0 + a = a :=
AddMonoid.zero_add a
theorem left_neg_eq_right_neg (hba : b + a = 0) (hac : a + c = 0) : b = c :=
by rw [←zero_add c, ←hba, add_assoc, hac, add_zero b]
end AddMonoid_lemmas
/-
### Commutative additive monoids
-/
class AddCommMonoid (A : Type u) extends AddMonoid A where
add_comm (a b : A) : a + b = b + a
instance (A : Type u) [AddCommMonoid A] : AddCommSemigroup A where
__ := ‹AddCommMonoid A›
/-
### Additive groups
-/
class AddGroup (A : Type u) extends AddMonoid A, Neg A, Sub A where
add_left_neg (a : A) : -a + a = 0
sub_eq_add_neg (a b : A) : a - b = a + -b
gsmul : ℤ → A → A := gsmul_rec
gpow_zero' (a : A) : gsmul 0 a = 0 -- try rfl
gpow_succ' (n : ℕ) (a : A) : gsmul (Int.ofNat n.succ) a = a + gsmul (Int.ofNat n) a
gpow_neg' (n : ℕ) (a : A) : gsmul (Int.negSucc n) a = -(gsmul ↑(n.succ) a)
section AddGroup_lemmas
variable {A : Type u} [AddGroup A] {a b c : A}
@[simp] theorem add_left_neg : ∀ a : A, -a + a = 0 :=
AddGroup.add_left_neg
theorem neg_add_self (a : A) : -a + a = 0 := add_left_neg a
@[simp] theorem neg_add_cancel_left (a b : A) : -a + (a + b) = b :=
by rw [← add_assoc, add_left_neg, zero_add]
@[simp] theorem neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero (h : a + b = 0) : -a = b :=
left_neg_eq_right_neg (neg_add_self a) h
@[simp] theorem neg_neg (a : A) : -(-a) = a :=
neg_eq_of_add_eq_zero (add_left_neg a)
@[simp] theorem add_right_neg (a : A) : a + -a = 0 := by
rw [←add_left_neg (-a), neg_neg]
-- synonym
theorem add_neg_self (a : A) : a + -a = 0 := add_right_neg a
@[simp] theorem add_neg_cancel_right (a b : A) : a + b + -b = a :=
by rw [add_assoc, add_right_neg, add_zero]
instance (A : Type u) [AddGroup A] : IsAddRightCancel A where
add_right_cancel a b c h := by
rw [← add_neg_cancel_right b a, h, add_neg_cancel_right]
instance (A : Type u) [AddGroup A] : IsAddLeftCancel A where
add_left_cancel a b c h := by
rw [← neg_add_cancel_left a b, h, neg_add_cancel_left]
end AddGroup_lemmas
class AddCommGroup (A : Type u) extends AddGroup A where
add_comm (a b : A) : a + b = b + a
instance (A : Type u) [AddCommGroup A] : AddCommMonoid A where
__ := ‹AddCommGroup A›
/-
## Multiplicative semigroups, monoids and groups
-/
/-
## Semigroups
-/
class Semigroup (G : Type u) extends Mul G where
mul_assoc (a b c : G) : (a * b) * c = a * (b * c)
theorem mul_assoc {G : Type u} [Semigroup G] :
∀ a b c : G, a * b * c = a * (b * c) :=
Semigroup.mul_assoc
class CommSemigroup (G : Type u) extends Semigroup G where
mul_comm (a b : G) : a * b = b * a
theorem mul_comm {M : Type u} [CommSemigroup M] : ∀ a b : M, a * b = b * a :=
CommSemigroup.mul_comm
/-
### Cancellative semigroups
-/
class IsMulLeftCancel (G : Type u) [Mul G] where
mul_left_cancel (a b c : G) : a * b = a * c → b = c
class IsMulRightCancel (G : Type u) [Mul G] where
mul_right_cancel (a b c : G) : b * a = c * a → b = c
section MulLeftCancel
variable {G : Type u} [Semigroup G] [IsMulLeftCancel G] {a b c : G}
theorem mul_left_cancel : a * b = a * c → b = c :=
IsMulLeftCancel.mul_left_cancel a b c
theorem mul_left_cancel_iff : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
⟨mul_left_cancel, congrArg _⟩
-- no `function.injective`?
--theorem mul_right_injective (a : G) : function.injective (c * .) :=
--λ a b => mul_left_cancel
@[simp] theorem mul_right_inj (a : G) {b c : G} : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
⟨mul_left_cancel, congrArg _⟩
--theorem mul_ne_mul_right (a : G) {b c : G} : a * b ≠ a * c ↔ b ≠ c :=
--(mul_right_injective a).ne_iff
end MulLeftCancel
section MulRightCancel
variable {G : Type u} [Semigroup G] [IsMulRightCancel G] {a b c : G}
theorem mul_right_cancel : b * a = c * a → b = c :=
IsMulRightCancel.mul_right_cancel a b c
theorem mul_right_cancel_iff : b * a = c * a ↔ b = c :=
⟨mul_right_cancel, λ h => h ▸ rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem mul_left_inj (a : G) {b c : G} : b * a = c * a ↔ b = c :=
⟨mul_right_cancel, λ h => h ▸ rfl⟩
end MulRightCancel
/-
### Monoids
-/
class Monoid (M : Type u) extends Semigroup M, One M where
mul_one (m : M) : m * 1 = m
one_mul (m : M) : 1 * m = m
npow : ℕ → M → M := npow_rec
npow_zero' : ∀ x, npow 0 x = 1 -- fill in with tactic once we can do this
npow_succ' : ∀ (n : ℕ) x, npow n.succ x = x * npow n x -- fill in with tactic
@[simp] theorem mul_one {M : Type u} [Monoid M] : ∀ (m : M), m * 1 = m :=
Monoid.mul_one
@[simp] theorem one_mul {M : Type u} [Monoid M] : ∀ (m : M), 1 * m = m :=
Monoid.one_mul
theorem left_inv_eq_right_inv {M : Type u} [Monoid M] {a b c : M}
(hba : b * a = 1) (hac : a * c = 1) : b = c :=
by rw [←one_mul c, ←hba, mul_assoc, hac, mul_one b]
/-
### Commutative monoids
-/
class CommMonoid (M : Type u) extends Monoid M where
mul_comm (a b : M) : a * b = b * a
instance (M : Type u) [CommMonoid M] : CommSemigroup M where
__ := ‹CommMonoid M›
/-
### Groups
-/
class Group (G : Type u) extends Monoid G, Inv G, Div G where
mul_left_inv (a : G) : a⁻¹ * a = 1
div_eq_mul_inv (a b : G) : a / b = a * b⁻¹
gpow : ℤ → G → G := gpow_rec
gpow_zero' (a : G) : gpow 0 a = 1 -- try rfl
gpow_succ' (n : ℕ) (a : G) : gpow (Int.ofNat n.succ) a = a * gpow (Int.ofNat n) a
gpow_neg' (n : ℕ) (a : G) : gpow (Int.negSucc n) a = (gpow ↑(n.succ) a)⁻¹
section Group_lemmas
variable {G : Type u} [Group G] {a b c : G}
@[simp] theorem mul_left_inv : ∀ a : G, a⁻¹ * a = 1 :=
Group.mul_left_inv
theorem inv_mul_self (a : G) : a⁻¹ * a = 1 := mul_left_inv a
@[simp] theorem inv_mul_cancel_left (a b : G) : a⁻¹ * (a * b) = b :=
by rw [← mul_assoc, mul_left_inv, one_mul]
@[simp] theorem inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one (h : a * b = 1) : a⁻¹ = b :=
left_inv_eq_right_inv (inv_mul_self a) h
@[simp] theorem inv_inv (a : G) : (a⁻¹)⁻¹ = a :=
inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one (mul_left_inv a)
@[simp] theorem mul_right_inv (a : G) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 := by
rw [←mul_left_inv (a⁻¹), inv_inv]
-- synonym
theorem mul_inv_self (a : G) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 := mul_right_inv a
@[simp] theorem mul_inv_cancel_right (a b : G) : a * b * b⁻¹ = a :=
by rw [mul_assoc, mul_right_inv, mul_one]
end Group_lemmas
class CommGroup (G : Type u) extends Group G where
mul_comm (a b : G) : a * b = b * a
instance (G : Type u) [CommGroup G] : CommMonoid G where
__ := ‹CommGroup G›
|
05015a458edb57026cff6eb98e6bc1b16fa471af | 02005f45e00c7ecf2c8ca5db60251bd1e9c860b5 | /src/analysis/normed_space/units.lean | 4d7f4424f827c55e638f165d19a0c1faccb53fbe | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | anthony2698/mathlib | 03cd69fe5c280b0916f6df2d07c614c8e1efe890 | 407615e05814e98b24b2ff322b14e8e3eb5e5d67 | refs/heads/master | 1,678,792,774,873 | 1,614,371,563,000 | 1,614,371,563,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 11,036 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Heather Macbeth. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Heather Macbeth
-/
import analysis.specific_limits
import analysis.asymptotics.asymptotics
/-!
# The group of units of a complete normed ring
This file contains the basic theory for the group of units (invertible elements) of a complete
normed ring (Banach algebras being a notable special case).
## Main results
The constructions `one_sub`, `add` and `unit_of_nearby` state, in varying forms, that perturbations
of a unit are units. The latter two are not stated in their optimal form; more precise versions
would use the spectral radius.
The first main result is `is_open`: the group of units of a complete normed ring is an open subset
of the ring.
The function `inverse` (defined in `algebra.ring`), for a ring `R`, sends `a : R` to `a⁻¹` if `a` is
a unit and 0 if not. The other major results of this file (notably `inverse_add`,
`inverse_add_norm` and `inverse_add_norm_diff_nth_order`) cover the asymptotic properties of
`inverse (x + t)` as `t → 0`.
-/
noncomputable theory
open_locale topological_space
variables {R : Type*} [normed_ring R] [complete_space R]
namespace units
/-- In a complete normed ring, a perturbation of `1` by an element `t` of distance less than `1`
from `1` is a unit. Here we construct its `units` structure. -/
def one_sub (t : R) (h : ∥t∥ < 1) : units R :=
{ val := 1 - t,
inv := ∑' n : ℕ, t ^ n,
val_inv := mul_neg_geom_series t h,
inv_val := geom_series_mul_neg t h }
@[simp] lemma one_sub_coe (t : R) (h : ∥t∥ < 1) : ↑(one_sub t h) = 1 - t := rfl
/-- In a complete normed ring, a perturbation of a unit `x` by an element `t` of distance less than
`∥x⁻¹∥⁻¹` from `x` is a unit. Here we construct its `units` structure. -/
def add (x : units R) (t : R) (h : ∥t∥ < ∥(↑x⁻¹ : R)∥⁻¹) : units R :=
x * (units.one_sub (-(↑x⁻¹ * t))
begin
nontriviality R using [zero_lt_one],
have hpos : 0 < ∥(↑x⁻¹ : R)∥ := units.norm_pos x⁻¹,
calc ∥-(↑x⁻¹ * t)∥
= ∥↑x⁻¹ * t∥ : by { rw norm_neg }
... ≤ ∥(↑x⁻¹ : R)∥ * ∥t∥ : norm_mul_le x.inv _
... < ∥(↑x⁻¹ : R)∥ * ∥(↑x⁻¹ : R)∥⁻¹ : by nlinarith only [h, hpos]
... = 1 : mul_inv_cancel (ne_of_gt hpos)
end)
@[simp] lemma add_coe (x : units R) (t : R) (h : ∥t∥ < ∥(↑x⁻¹ : R)∥⁻¹) :
((x.add t h) : R) = x + t := by { unfold units.add, simp [mul_add] }
/-- In a complete normed ring, an element `y` of distance less than `∥x⁻¹∥⁻¹` from `x` is a unit.
Here we construct its `units` structure. -/
def unit_of_nearby (x : units R) (y : R) (h : ∥y - x∥ < ∥(↑x⁻¹ : R)∥⁻¹) : units R :=
x.add ((y : R) - x) h
@[simp] lemma unit_of_nearby_coe (x : units R) (y : R) (h : ∥y - x∥ < ∥(↑x⁻¹ : R)∥⁻¹) :
↑(x.unit_of_nearby y h) = y := by { unfold units.unit_of_nearby, simp }
/-- The group of units of a complete normed ring is an open subset of the ring. -/
lemma is_open : is_open {x : R | is_unit x} :=
begin
nontriviality R,
apply metric.is_open_iff.mpr,
rintros x' ⟨x, h⟩,
refine ⟨∥(↑x⁻¹ : R)∥⁻¹, inv_pos.mpr (units.norm_pos x⁻¹), _⟩,
intros y hy,
rw [metric.mem_ball, dist_eq_norm, ←h] at hy,
use x.unit_of_nearby y hy,
simp
end
lemma nhds (x : units R) : {x : R | is_unit x} ∈ 𝓝 (x : R) :=
mem_nhds_sets is_open (by { rw [set.mem_set_of_eq], exact is_unit_unit x })
end units
namespace normed_ring
open_locale classical big_operators
open asymptotics filter metric finset ring
lemma inverse_one_sub (t : R) (h : ∥t∥ < 1) : inverse (1 - t) = ↑(units.one_sub t h)⁻¹ :=
begin
rw ← inverse_unit (units.one_sub t h),
refl,
end
/-- The formula `inverse (x + t) = inverse (1 + x⁻¹ * t) * x⁻¹` holds for `t` sufficiently small. -/
lemma inverse_add (x : units R) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓝 0), inverse ((x : R) + t) = inverse (1 + ↑x⁻¹ * t) * ↑x⁻¹ :=
begin
nontriviality R,
rw [eventually_iff, mem_nhds_iff],
have hinv : 0 < ∥(↑x⁻¹ : R)∥⁻¹, by cancel_denoms,
use [∥(↑x⁻¹ : R)∥⁻¹, hinv],
intros t ht,
simp only [mem_ball, dist_zero_right] at ht,
have ht' : ∥-↑x⁻¹ * t∥ < 1,
{ refine lt_of_le_of_lt (norm_mul_le _ _) _,
rw norm_neg,
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left ht x⁻¹.norm_pos) _,
cancel_denoms },
have hright := inverse_one_sub (-↑x⁻¹ * t) ht',
have hleft := inverse_unit (x.add t ht),
simp only [← neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, sub_neg_eq_add] at hright,
simp only [units.add_coe] at hleft,
simp [hleft, hright, units.add]
end
lemma inverse_one_sub_nth_order (n : ℕ) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓝 0), inverse ((1:R) - t) = (∑ i in range n, t ^ i) + (t ^ n) * inverse (1 - t) :=
begin
simp only [eventually_iff, mem_nhds_iff],
use [1, by norm_num],
intros t ht,
simp only [mem_ball, dist_zero_right] at ht,
simp only [inverse_one_sub t ht, set.mem_set_of_eq],
have h : 1 = ((range n).sum (λ i, t ^ i)) * (units.one_sub t ht) + t ^ n,
{ simp only [units.one_sub_coe],
rw [← geom_series, geom_sum_mul_neg],
simp },
rw [← one_mul ↑(units.one_sub t ht)⁻¹, h, add_mul],
congr,
{ rw [mul_assoc, (units.one_sub t ht).mul_inv],
simp },
{ simp only [units.one_sub_coe],
rw [← add_mul, ← geom_series, geom_sum_mul_neg],
simp }
end
/-- The formula
`inverse (x + t) = (∑ i in range n, (- x⁻¹ * t) ^ i) * x⁻¹ + (- x⁻¹ * t) ^ n * inverse (x + t)`
holds for `t` sufficiently small. -/
lemma inverse_add_nth_order (x : units R) (n : ℕ) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓝 0), inverse ((x : R) + t)
= (∑ i in range n, (- ↑x⁻¹ * t) ^ i) * ↑x⁻¹ + (- ↑x⁻¹ * t) ^ n * inverse (x + t) :=
begin
refine (inverse_add x).mp _,
have hzero : tendsto (λ (t : R), - ↑x⁻¹ * t) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0),
{ convert ((mul_left_continuous (- (↑x⁻¹ : R))).tendsto 0).comp tendsto_id,
simp },
refine (hzero.eventually (inverse_one_sub_nth_order n)).mp (eventually_of_forall _),
simp only [neg_mul_eq_neg_mul_symm, sub_neg_eq_add],
intros t h1 h2,
have h := congr_arg (λ (a : R), a * ↑x⁻¹) h1,
dsimp at h,
convert h,
rw [add_mul, mul_assoc],
simp [h2.symm]
end
lemma inverse_one_sub_norm : is_O (λ t, inverse ((1:R) - t)) (λ t, (1:ℝ)) (𝓝 (0:R)) :=
begin
simp only [is_O, is_O_with, eventually_iff, mem_nhds_iff],
refine ⟨∥(1:R)∥ + 1, (2:ℝ)⁻¹, by norm_num, _⟩,
intros t ht,
simp only [ball, dist_zero_right, set.mem_set_of_eq] at ht,
have ht' : ∥t∥ < 1,
{ have : (2:ℝ)⁻¹ < 1 := by cancel_denoms,
linarith },
simp only [inverse_one_sub t ht', norm_one, mul_one, set.mem_set_of_eq],
change ∥∑' n : ℕ, t ^ n∥ ≤ _,
have := normed_ring.tsum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 t ht',
have : (1 - ∥t∥)⁻¹ ≤ 2,
{ rw ← inv_inv' (2:ℝ),
refine inv_le_inv_of_le (by norm_num) _,
have : (2:ℝ)⁻¹ + (2:ℝ)⁻¹ = 1 := by ring,
linarith },
linarith
end
/-- The function `λ t, inverse (x + t)` is O(1) as `t → 0`. -/
lemma inverse_add_norm (x : units R) : is_O (λ t, inverse (↑x + t)) (λ t, (1:ℝ)) (𝓝 (0:R)) :=
begin
nontriviality R,
simp only [is_O_iff, norm_one, mul_one],
cases is_O_iff.mp (@inverse_one_sub_norm R _ _) with C hC,
use C * ∥((x⁻¹:units R):R)∥,
have hzero : tendsto (λ t, - (↑x⁻¹ : R) * t) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0),
{ convert ((mul_left_continuous (-↑x⁻¹ : R)).tendsto 0).comp tendsto_id,
simp },
refine (inverse_add x).mp ((hzero.eventually hC).mp (eventually_of_forall _)),
intros t bound iden,
rw iden,
simp at bound,
have hmul := norm_mul_le (inverse (1 + ↑x⁻¹ * t)) ↑x⁻¹,
nlinarith [norm_nonneg (↑x⁻¹ : R)]
end
/-- The function
`λ t, inverse (x + t) - (∑ i in range n, (- x⁻¹ * t) ^ i) * x⁻¹`
is `O(t ^ n)` as `t → 0`. -/
lemma inverse_add_norm_diff_nth_order (x : units R) (n : ℕ) :
is_O (λ (t : R), inverse (↑x + t) - (∑ i in range n, (- ↑x⁻¹ * t) ^ i) * ↑x⁻¹)
(λ t, ∥t∥ ^ n) (𝓝 (0:R)) :=
begin
by_cases h : n = 0,
{ simpa [h] using inverse_add_norm x },
have hn : 0 < n := nat.pos_of_ne_zero h,
simp [is_O_iff],
cases (is_O_iff.mp (inverse_add_norm x)) with C hC,
use C * ∥(1:ℝ)∥ * ∥(↑x⁻¹ : R)∥ ^ n,
have h : eventually_eq (𝓝 (0:R))
(λ t, inverse (↑x + t) - (∑ i in range n, (- ↑x⁻¹ * t) ^ i) * ↑x⁻¹)
(λ t, ((- ↑x⁻¹ * t) ^ n) * inverse (x + t)),
{ refine (inverse_add_nth_order x n).mp (eventually_of_forall _),
intros t ht,
convert congr_arg (λ a, a - (range n).sum (pow (-↑x⁻¹ * t)) * ↑x⁻¹) ht,
simp },
refine h.mp (hC.mp (eventually_of_forall _)),
intros t _ hLHS,
simp only [neg_mul_eq_neg_mul_symm] at hLHS,
rw hLHS,
refine le_trans (norm_mul_le _ _ ) _,
have h' : ∥(-(↑x⁻¹ * t)) ^ n∥ ≤ ∥(↑x⁻¹ : R)∥ ^ n * ∥t∥ ^ n,
{ calc ∥(-(↑x⁻¹ * t)) ^ n∥ ≤ ∥(-(↑x⁻¹ * t))∥ ^ n : norm_pow_le' _ hn
... = ∥↑x⁻¹ * t∥ ^ n : by rw norm_neg
... ≤ (∥(↑x⁻¹ : R)∥ * ∥t∥) ^ n : _
... = ∥(↑x⁻¹ : R)∥ ^ n * ∥t∥ ^ n : mul_pow _ _ n,
exact pow_le_pow_of_le_left (norm_nonneg _) (norm_mul_le ↑x⁻¹ t) n },
have h'' : 0 ≤ ∥(↑x⁻¹ : R)∥ ^ n * ∥t∥ ^ n,
{ refine mul_nonneg _ _;
exact pow_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) n },
nlinarith [norm_nonneg (inverse (↑x + t))],
end
/-- The function `λ t, inverse (x + t) - x⁻¹` is `O(t)` as `t → 0`. -/
lemma inverse_add_norm_diff_first_order (x : units R) :
is_O (λ t, inverse (↑x + t) - ↑x⁻¹) (λ t, ∥t∥) (𝓝 (0:R)) :=
by { convert inverse_add_norm_diff_nth_order x 1; simp }
/-- The function
`λ t, inverse (x + t) - x⁻¹ + x⁻¹ * t * x⁻¹`
is `O(t ^ 2)` as `t → 0`. -/
lemma inverse_add_norm_diff_second_order (x : units R) :
is_O (λ t, inverse (↑x + t) - ↑x⁻¹ + ↑x⁻¹ * t * ↑x⁻¹) (λ t, ∥t∥ ^ 2) (𝓝 (0:R)) :=
begin
convert inverse_add_norm_diff_nth_order x 2,
ext t,
simp only [range_succ, range_one, sum_insert, mem_singleton, sum_singleton, not_false_iff,
one_ne_zero, pow_zero, add_mul],
abel,
simp
end
/-- The function `inverse` is continuous at each unit of `R`. -/
lemma inverse_continuous_at (x : units R) : continuous_at inverse (x : R) :=
begin
have h_is_o : is_o (λ (t : R), ∥inverse (↑x + t) - ↑x⁻¹∥) (λ (t : R), (1:ℝ)) (𝓝 0),
{ refine is_o_norm_left.mpr ((inverse_add_norm_diff_first_order x).trans_is_o _),
exact is_o_norm_left.mpr (is_o_id_const one_ne_zero) },
have h_lim : tendsto (λ (y:R), y - x) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0),
{ refine tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.mpr _,
exact tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.mp tendsto_id },
simp only [continuous_at],
rw [tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero, inverse_unit],
convert h_is_o.tendsto_0.comp h_lim,
ext, simp
end
end normed_ring
|
036d0119b2be2f6195401e7d9e85525bf9577913 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/data/qpf/univariate/basic_auto.lean | c4743f878ceac1d171a712dda7e6e8812a4eddf0 | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 17,390 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.data.pfunctor.univariate.default
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u l u_1
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# Quotients of Polynomial Functors
We assume the following:
`P` : a polynomial functor
`W` : its W-type
`M` : its M-type
`F` : a functor
We define:
`q` : `qpf` data, representing `F` as a quotient of `P`
The main goal is to construct:
`fix` : the initial algebra with structure map `F fix → fix`.
`cofix` : the final coalgebra with structure map `cofix → F cofix`
We also show that the composition of qpfs is a qpf, and that the quotient of a qpf
is a qpf.
The present theory focuses on the univariate case for qpfs
## References
* [Jeremy Avigad, Mario M. Carneiro and Simon Hudon, *Data Types as Quotients of Polynomial Functors*][avigad-carneiro-hudon2019]
-/
/--
Quotients of polynomial functors.
Roughly speaking, saying that `F` is a quotient of a polynomial functor means that for each `α`,
elements of `F α` are represented by pairs `⟨a, f⟩`, where `a` is the shape of the object and
`f` indexes the relevant elements of `α`, in a suitably natural manner.
-/
class qpf (F : Type u → Type u) [Functor F] where
P : pfunctor
abs : {α : Type u} → pfunctor.obj P α → F α
repr : {α : Type u} → F α → pfunctor.obj P α
abs_repr : ∀ {α : Type u} (x : F α), abs (repr x) = x
abs_map : ∀ {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) (p : pfunctor.obj P α), abs (f <$> p) = f <$> abs p
namespace qpf
/-
Show that every qpf is a lawful functor.
Note: every functor has a field, `map_const`, and is_lawful_functor has the defining
characterization. We can only propagate the assumption.
-/
theorem id_map {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] {α : Type u} (x : F α) :
id <$> x = x :=
sorry
theorem comp_map {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] {α : Type u} {β : Type u}
{γ : Type u} (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) (x : F α) : (g ∘ f) <$> x = g <$> f <$> x :=
sorry
theorem is_lawful_functor {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F]
(h : ∀ (α β : Type u), Functor.mapConst = Functor.map ∘ function.const β) :
is_lawful_functor F :=
is_lawful_functor.mk id_map comp_map
/-
Lifting predicates and relations
-/
theorem liftp_iff {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] {α : Type u} (p : α → Prop)
(x : F α) :
functor.liftp p x ↔
∃ (a : pfunctor.A (P F)),
∃ (f : pfunctor.B (P F) a → α),
x = abs (sigma.mk a f) ∧ ∀ (i : pfunctor.B (P F) a), p (f i) :=
sorry
theorem liftp_iff' {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] {α : Type u} (p : α → Prop)
(x : F α) :
functor.liftp p x ↔
∃ (u : pfunctor.obj (P F) α),
abs u = x ∧ ∀ (i : pfunctor.B (P F) (sigma.fst u)), p (sigma.snd u i) :=
sorry
theorem liftr_iff {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] {α : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop)
(x : F α) (y : F α) :
functor.liftr r x y ↔
∃ (a : pfunctor.A (P F)),
∃ (f₀ : pfunctor.B (P F) a → α),
∃ (f₁ : pfunctor.B (P F) a → α),
x = abs (sigma.mk a f₀) ∧
y = abs (sigma.mk a f₁) ∧ ∀ (i : pfunctor.B (P F) a), r (f₀ i) (f₁ i) :=
sorry
/-
Think of trees in the `W` type corresponding to `P` as representatives of elements of the
least fixed point of `F`, and assign a canonical representative to each equivalence class
of trees.
-/
/-- does recursion on `q.P.W` using `g : F α → α` rather than `g : P α → α` -/
def recF {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] {α : Type u} (g : F α → α) :
pfunctor.W (P F) → α :=
sorry
theorem recF_eq {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] {α : Type u} (g : F α → α)
(x : pfunctor.W (P F)) : recF g x = g (abs (recF g <$> pfunctor.W.dest x)) :=
W_type.cases_on x
fun (x_a : pfunctor.A (P F)) (x_f : pfunctor.B (P F) x_a → W_type (pfunctor.B (P F))) =>
Eq.refl (recF g (W_type.mk x_a x_f))
theorem recF_eq' {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] {α : Type u} (g : F α → α)
(a : pfunctor.A (P F)) (f : pfunctor.B (P F) a → pfunctor.W (P F)) :
recF g (W_type.mk a f) = g (abs (recF g <$> sigma.mk a f)) :=
rfl
/-- two trees are equivalent if their F-abstractions are -/
inductive Wequiv {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] :
pfunctor.W (P F) → pfunctor.W (P F) → Prop
where
| ind :
∀ (a : pfunctor.A (P F)) (f f' : pfunctor.B (P F) a → pfunctor.W (P F)),
(∀ (x : pfunctor.B (P F) a), Wequiv (f x) (f' x)) → Wequiv (W_type.mk a f) (W_type.mk a f')
| abs :
∀ (a : pfunctor.A (P F)) (f : pfunctor.B (P F) a → pfunctor.W (P F)) (a' : pfunctor.A (P F))
(f' : pfunctor.B (P F) a' → pfunctor.W (P F)),
abs (sigma.mk a f) = abs (sigma.mk a' f') → Wequiv (W_type.mk a f) (W_type.mk a' f')
| trans : ∀ (u v w : pfunctor.W (P F)), Wequiv u v → Wequiv v w → Wequiv u w
/-- recF is insensitive to the representation -/
theorem recF_eq_of_Wequiv {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] {α : Type u} (u : F α → α)
(x : pfunctor.W (P F)) (y : pfunctor.W (P F)) : Wequiv x y → recF u x = recF u y :=
sorry
theorem Wequiv.abs' {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] (x : pfunctor.W (P F))
(y : pfunctor.W (P F)) (h : abs (pfunctor.W.dest x) = abs (pfunctor.W.dest y)) : Wequiv x y :=
sorry
theorem Wequiv.refl {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] (x : pfunctor.W (P F)) :
Wequiv x x :=
W_type.cases_on x
fun (a : pfunctor.A (P F)) (f : pfunctor.B (P F) a → W_type (pfunctor.B (P F))) =>
Wequiv.abs a f a f rfl
theorem Wequiv.symm {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] (x : pfunctor.W (P F))
(y : pfunctor.W (P F)) : Wequiv x y → Wequiv y x :=
sorry
/-- maps every element of the W type to a canonical representative -/
def Wrepr {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] : pfunctor.W (P F) → pfunctor.W (P F) :=
recF (pfunctor.W.mk ∘ repr)
theorem Wrepr_equiv {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] (x : pfunctor.W (P F)) :
Wequiv (Wrepr x) x :=
sorry
/--
Define the fixed point as the quotient of trees under the equivalence relation `Wequiv`.
-/
def W_setoid {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] : setoid (pfunctor.W (P F)) :=
setoid.mk Wequiv sorry
/-- inductive type defined as initial algebra of a Quotient of Polynomial Functor -/
def fix (F : Type u → Type u) [Functor F] [q : qpf F] := quotient W_setoid
/-- recursor of a type defined by a qpf -/
def fix.rec {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] {α : Type u} (g : F α → α) : fix F → α :=
Quot.lift (recF g) (recF_eq_of_Wequiv g)
/-- access the underlying W-type of a fixpoint data type -/
def fix_to_W {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] : fix F → pfunctor.W (P F) :=
quotient.lift Wrepr sorry
/-- constructor of a type defined by a qpf -/
def fix.mk {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] (x : F (fix F)) : fix F :=
Quot.mk setoid.r (pfunctor.W.mk (fix_to_W <$> repr x))
/-- destructor of a type defined by a qpf -/
def fix.dest {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] : fix F → F (fix F) :=
fix.rec (Functor.map fix.mk)
theorem fix.rec_eq {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] {α : Type u} (g : F α → α)
(x : F (fix F)) : fix.rec g (fix.mk x) = g (fix.rec g <$> x) :=
sorry
theorem fix.ind_aux {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] (a : pfunctor.A (P F))
(f : pfunctor.B (P F) a → pfunctor.W (P F)) :
fix.mk (abs (sigma.mk a fun (x : pfunctor.B (P F) a) => quotient.mk (f x))) =
quotient.mk (W_type.mk a f) :=
sorry
theorem fix.ind_rec {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] {α : Type u} (g₁ : fix F → α)
(g₂ : fix F → α) (h : ∀ (x : F (fix F)), g₁ <$> x = g₂ <$> x → g₁ (fix.mk x) = g₂ (fix.mk x))
(x : fix F) : g₁ x = g₂ x :=
sorry
theorem fix.rec_unique {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] {α : Type u} (g : F α → α)
(h : fix F → α) (hyp : ∀ (x : F (fix F)), h (fix.mk x) = g (h <$> x)) : fix.rec g = h :=
sorry
theorem fix.mk_dest {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] (x : fix F) :
fix.mk (fix.dest x) = x :=
sorry
theorem fix.dest_mk {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] (x : F (fix F)) :
fix.dest (fix.mk x) = x :=
sorry
theorem fix.ind {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] (p : fix F → Prop)
(h : ∀ (x : F (fix F)), functor.liftp p x → p (fix.mk x)) (x : fix F) : p x :=
sorry
end qpf
/-
Construct the final coalgebra to a qpf.
-/
namespace qpf
/-- does recursion on `q.P.M` using `g : α → F α` rather than `g : α → P α` -/
def corecF {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] {α : Type u} (g : α → F α) :
α → pfunctor.M (P F) :=
pfunctor.M.corec fun (x : α) => repr (g x)
theorem corecF_eq {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] {α : Type u} (g : α → F α) (x : α) :
pfunctor.M.dest (corecF g x) = corecF g <$> repr (g x) :=
sorry
/- Equivalence -/
/-- A pre-congruence on q.P.M *viewed as an F-coalgebra*. Not necessarily symmetric. -/
def is_precongr {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F]
(r : pfunctor.M (P F) → pfunctor.M (P F) → Prop) :=
∀ {x y : pfunctor.M (P F)},
r x y → abs (Quot.mk r <$> pfunctor.M.dest x) = abs (Quot.mk r <$> pfunctor.M.dest y)
/-- The maximal congruence on q.P.M -/
def Mcongr {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] :
pfunctor.M (P F) → pfunctor.M (P F) → Prop :=
fun (x y : pfunctor.M (P F)) =>
∃ (r : pfunctor.M (P F) → pfunctor.M (P F) → Prop), is_precongr r ∧ r x y
/-- coinductive type defined as the final coalgebra of a qpf -/
def cofix (F : Type u → Type u) [Functor F] [q : qpf F] := Quot Mcongr
protected instance cofix.inhabited {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F]
[Inhabited (pfunctor.A (P F))] : Inhabited (cofix F) :=
{ default := Quot.mk Mcongr Inhabited.default }
/-- corecursor for type defined by `cofix` -/
def cofix.corec {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] {α : Type u} (g : α → F α) (x : α) :
cofix F :=
Quot.mk Mcongr (corecF g x)
/-- destructor for type defined by `cofix` -/
def cofix.dest {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] : cofix F → F (cofix F) :=
Quot.lift (fun (x : pfunctor.M (P F)) => Quot.mk Mcongr <$> abs (pfunctor.M.dest x)) sorry
theorem cofix.dest_corec {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] {α : Type u} (g : α → F α)
(x : α) : cofix.dest (cofix.corec g x) = cofix.corec g <$> g x :=
sorry
theorem cofix.bisim_rel {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] (r : cofix F → cofix F → Prop)
(h : ∀ (x y : cofix F), r x y → Quot.mk r <$> cofix.dest x = Quot.mk r <$> cofix.dest y)
(x : cofix F) (y : cofix F) : r x y → x = y :=
sorry
theorem cofix.bisim {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] (r : cofix F → cofix F → Prop)
(h : ∀ (x y : cofix F), r x y → functor.liftr r (cofix.dest x) (cofix.dest y)) (x : cofix F)
(y : cofix F) : r x y → x = y :=
sorry
theorem cofix.bisim' {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] {α : Type u_1} (Q : α → Prop)
(u : α → cofix F) (v : α → cofix F)
(h :
∀ (x : α),
Q x →
∃ (a : pfunctor.A (P F)),
∃ (f : pfunctor.B (P F) a → cofix F),
∃ (f' : pfunctor.B (P F) a → cofix F),
cofix.dest (u x) = abs (sigma.mk a f) ∧
cofix.dest (v x) = abs (sigma.mk a f') ∧
∀ (i : pfunctor.B (P F) a), ∃ (x' : α), Q x' ∧ f i = u x' ∧ f' i = v x')
(x : α) : Q x → u x = v x :=
sorry
end qpf
/-
Composition of qpfs.
-/
namespace qpf
/-- composition of qpfs gives another qpf -/
def comp {F₂ : Type u → Type u} [Functor F₂] [q₂ : qpf F₂] {F₁ : Type u → Type u} [Functor F₁]
[q₁ : qpf F₁] : qpf (functor.comp F₂ F₁) :=
mk (pfunctor.comp (P F₂) (P F₁))
(fun (α : Type u) =>
id
fun (p : pfunctor.obj (pfunctor.comp (P F₂) (P F₁)) α) =>
abs
(sigma.mk (sigma.fst (sigma.fst p))
fun (x : pfunctor.B (P F₂) (sigma.fst (sigma.fst p))) =>
abs
(sigma.mk (sigma.snd (sigma.fst p) x)
fun (y : pfunctor.B (P F₁) (sigma.snd (sigma.fst p) x)) =>
sigma.snd p (sigma.mk x y))))
(fun (α : Type u) =>
id
fun (y : F₂ (F₁ α)) =>
sigma.mk
(sigma.mk (sigma.fst (repr y))
fun (u : pfunctor.B (P F₂) (sigma.fst (repr y))) =>
sigma.fst (repr (sigma.snd (repr y) u)))
(id
fun
(x :
sigma
fun (u : pfunctor.B (P F₂) (sigma.fst (repr y))) =>
pfunctor.B (P F₁) (sigma.fst (repr (sigma.snd (repr y) u)))) =>
sigma.snd (repr (sigma.snd (repr y) (sigma.fst x))) (sigma.snd x)))
sorry sorry
end qpf
/-
Quotients.
We show that if `F` is a qpf and `G` is a suitable quotient of `F`, then `G` is a qpf.
-/
namespace qpf
/-- Given a qpf `F` and a well-behaved surjection `FG_abs` from F α to
functor G α, `G` is a qpf. We can consider `G` a quotient on `F` where
elements `x y : F α` are in the same equivalence class if
`FG_abs x = FG_abs y` -/
def quotient_qpf {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] {G : Type u → Type u} [Functor G]
{FG_abs : {α : Type u} → F α → G α} {FG_repr : {α : Type u} → G α → F α}
(FG_abs_repr : ∀ {α : Type u} (x : G α), FG_abs (FG_repr x) = x)
(FG_abs_map : ∀ {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) (x : F α), FG_abs (f <$> x) = f <$> FG_abs x) :
qpf G :=
mk (P F) (fun {α : Type u} (p : pfunctor.obj (P F) α) => FG_abs (abs p))
(fun {α : Type u} (x : G α) => repr (FG_repr x)) sorry sorry
end qpf
/-
Support.
-/
namespace qpf
theorem mem_supp {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] {α : Type u} (x : F α) (u : α) :
u ∈ functor.supp x ↔
∀ (a : pfunctor.A (P F)) (f : pfunctor.B (P F) a → α),
abs (sigma.mk a f) = x → u ∈ f '' set.univ :=
sorry
theorem supp_eq {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] {α : Type u} (x : F α) :
functor.supp x =
set_of
fun (u : α) =>
∀ (a : pfunctor.A (P F)) (f : pfunctor.B (P F) a → α),
abs (sigma.mk a f) = x → u ∈ f '' set.univ :=
set.ext fun (x_1 : α) => mem_supp x x_1
theorem has_good_supp_iff {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] {α : Type u} (x : F α) :
(∀ (p : α → Prop), functor.liftp p x ↔ ∀ (u : α), u ∈ functor.supp x → p u) ↔
∃ (a : pfunctor.A (P F)),
∃ (f : pfunctor.B (P F) a → α),
abs (sigma.mk a f) = x ∧
∀ (a' : pfunctor.A (P F)) (f' : pfunctor.B (P F) a' → α),
abs (sigma.mk a' f') = x → f '' set.univ ⊆ f' '' set.univ :=
sorry
/-- A qpf is said to be uniform if every polynomial functor
representing a single value all have the same range. -/
def is_uniform {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] (q : qpf F) :=
∀ {α : Type u} (a a' : pfunctor.A (P F)) (f : pfunctor.B (P F) a → α)
(f' : pfunctor.B (P F) a' → α),
abs (sigma.mk a f) = abs (sigma.mk a' f') → f '' set.univ = f' '' set.univ
/-- does `abs` preserve `liftp`? -/
def liftp_preservation {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] (q : qpf F) :=
∀ {α : Type u} (p : α → Prop) (x : pfunctor.obj (P F) α),
functor.liftp p (abs x) ↔ functor.liftp p x
/-- does `abs` preserve `supp`? -/
def supp_preservation {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] (q : qpf F) :=
∀ {α : Type u} (x : pfunctor.obj (P F) α), functor.supp (abs x) = functor.supp x
theorem supp_eq_of_is_uniform {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] (h : is_uniform q)
{α : Type u} (a : pfunctor.A (P F)) (f : pfunctor.B (P F) a → α) :
functor.supp (abs (sigma.mk a f)) = f '' set.univ :=
sorry
theorem liftp_iff_of_is_uniform {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] (h : is_uniform q)
{α : Type u} (x : F α) (p : α → Prop) :
functor.liftp p x ↔ ∀ (u : α), u ∈ functor.supp x → p u :=
sorry
theorem supp_map {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] (h : is_uniform q) {α : Type u}
{β : Type u} (g : α → β) (x : F α) : functor.supp (g <$> x) = g '' functor.supp x :=
sorry
theorem supp_preservation_iff_uniform {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] :
supp_preservation q ↔ is_uniform q :=
sorry
theorem supp_preservation_iff_liftp_preservation {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] :
supp_preservation q ↔ liftp_preservation q :=
sorry
theorem liftp_preservation_iff_uniform {F : Type u → Type u} [Functor F] [q : qpf F] :
liftp_preservation q ↔ is_uniform q :=
sorry
end Mathlib |
5de1af4bf75e24f8159d74477f62fcf7a36146bb | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/model_theory/language_map.lean | a6a5e85c3d5340d156e4b57366eae6a4e9fc8da7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 19,747 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn
-/
import model_theory.basic
/-!
# Language Maps
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
Maps between first-order languages in the style of the
[Flypitch project](https://flypitch.github.io/), as well as several important maps between
structures.
## Main Definitions
* A `first_order.language.Lhom`, denoted `L →ᴸ L'`, is a map between languages, sending the symbols
of one to symbols of the same kind and arity in the other.
* A `first_order.language.Lequiv`, denoted `L ≃ᴸ L'`, is an invertible language homomorphism.
* `first_order.language.with_constants` is defined so that if `M` is an `L.Structure` and
`A : set M`, `L.with_constants A`, denoted `L[[A]]`, is a language which adds constant symbols for
elements of `A` to `L`.
## References
For the Flypitch project:
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formal proof of the independence of the continuum hypothesis*]
[flypitch_cpp]
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formalization of forcing and the unprovability of
the continuum hypothesis*][flypitch_itp]
-/
universes u v u' v' w w'
namespace first_order
namespace language
open Structure cardinal
open_locale cardinal
variables (L : language.{u v}) (L' : language.{u' v'}) {M : Type w} [L.Structure M]
/-- A language homomorphism maps the symbols of one language to symbols of another. -/
structure Lhom :=
(on_function : ∀ ⦃n⦄, L.functions n → L'.functions n)
(on_relation : ∀ ⦃n⦄, L.relations n → L'.relations n)
infix ` →ᴸ `:10 := Lhom -- \^L
variables {L L'}
namespace Lhom
/-- Defines a map between languages defined with `language.mk₂`. -/
protected def mk₂ {c f₁ f₂ : Type u} {r₁ r₂ : Type v}
(φ₀ : c → L'.constants) (φ₁ : f₁ → L'.functions 1) (φ₂ : f₂ → L'.functions 2)
(φ₁' : r₁ → L'.relations 1) (φ₂' : r₂ → L'.relations 2) :
language.mk₂ c f₁ f₂ r₁ r₂ →ᴸ L' :=
⟨λ n, nat.cases_on n φ₀ (λ n, nat.cases_on n φ₁ (λ n, nat.cases_on n φ₂ (λ _, pempty.elim))),
λ n, nat.cases_on n pempty.elim
(λ n, nat.cases_on n φ₁' (λ n, nat.cases_on n φ₂' (λ _, pempty.elim)))⟩
variables (ϕ : L →ᴸ L')
/-- Pulls a structure back along a language map. -/
def reduct (M : Type*) [L'.Structure M] : L.Structure M :=
{ fun_map := λ n f xs, fun_map (ϕ.on_function f) xs,
rel_map := λ n r xs, rel_map (ϕ.on_relation r) xs }
/-- The identity language homomorphism. -/
@[simps] protected def id (L : language) : L →ᴸ L :=
⟨λn, id, λ n, id⟩
instance : inhabited (L →ᴸ L) := ⟨Lhom.id L⟩
/-- The inclusion of the left factor into the sum of two languages. -/
@[simps] protected def sum_inl : L →ᴸ L.sum L' :=
⟨λn, sum.inl, λ n, sum.inl⟩
/-- The inclusion of the right factor into the sum of two languages. -/
@[simps] protected def sum_inr : L' →ᴸ L.sum L' :=
⟨λn, sum.inr, λ n, sum.inr⟩
variables (L L')
/-- The inclusion of an empty language into any other language. -/
@[simps] protected def of_is_empty [L.is_algebraic] [L.is_relational] : L →ᴸ L' :=
⟨λ n, (is_relational.empty_functions n).elim, λ n, (is_algebraic.empty_relations n).elim⟩
variables {L L'} {L'' : language}
@[ext] protected lemma funext {F G : L →ᴸ L'} (h_fun : F.on_function = G.on_function )
(h_rel : F.on_relation = G.on_relation ) : F = G :=
by {cases F with Ff Fr, cases G with Gf Gr, simp only *, exact and.intro h_fun h_rel}
instance [L.is_algebraic] [L.is_relational] : unique (L →ᴸ L') :=
⟨⟨Lhom.of_is_empty L L'⟩, λ _, Lhom.funext (subsingleton.elim _ _) (subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩
lemma mk₂_funext {c f₁ f₂ : Type u} {r₁ r₂ : Type v} {F G : language.mk₂ c f₁ f₂ r₁ r₂ →ᴸ L'}
(h0 : ∀ (c : (language.mk₂ c f₁ f₂ r₁ r₂).constants), F.on_function c = G.on_function c)
(h1 : ∀ (f : (language.mk₂ c f₁ f₂ r₁ r₂).functions 1), F.on_function f = G.on_function f)
(h2 : ∀ (f : (language.mk₂ c f₁ f₂ r₁ r₂).functions 2), F.on_function f = G.on_function f)
(h1' : ∀ (r : (language.mk₂ c f₁ f₂ r₁ r₂).relations 1), F.on_relation r = G.on_relation r)
(h2' : ∀ (r : (language.mk₂ c f₁ f₂ r₁ r₂).relations 2), F.on_relation r = G.on_relation r) :
F = G :=
Lhom.funext (funext (λ n, nat.cases_on n (funext h0) (λ n, nat.cases_on n (funext h1)
(λ n, nat.cases_on n (funext h2) (λ n, funext (λ f, pempty.elim f))))))
(funext (λ n, nat.cases_on n (funext (λ r, pempty.elim r)) (λ n, nat.cases_on n (funext h1')
(λ n, nat.cases_on n (funext h2') (λ n, funext (λ r, pempty.elim r))))))
/-- The composition of two language homomorphisms. -/
@[simps] def comp (g : L' →ᴸ L'') (f : L →ᴸ L') : L →ᴸ L'' :=
⟨λ n F, g.1 (f.1 F), λ _ R, g.2 (f.2 R)⟩
local infix (name := Lhom.comp) ` ∘ `:60 := Lhom.comp
@[simp] lemma id_comp (F : L →ᴸ L') : (Lhom.id L') ∘ F = F :=
by {cases F, refl}
@[simp] lemma comp_id (F : L →ᴸ L') : F ∘ (Lhom.id L) = F :=
by {cases F, refl}
lemma comp_assoc {L3 : language} (F: L'' →ᴸ L3) (G : L' →ᴸ L'') (H : L →ᴸ L') :
(F ∘ G) ∘ H = F ∘ (G ∘ H) :=
rfl
section sum_elim
variables (ψ : L'' →ᴸ L')
/-- A language map defined on two factors of a sum. -/
@[simps] protected def sum_elim : L.sum L'' →ᴸ L' :=
{ on_function := λ n, sum.elim (λ f, ϕ.on_function f) (λ f, ψ.on_function f),
on_relation := λ n, sum.elim (λ f, ϕ.on_relation f) (λ f, ψ.on_relation f) }
lemma sum_elim_comp_inl (ψ : L'' →ᴸ L') :
(ϕ.sum_elim ψ) ∘ Lhom.sum_inl = ϕ :=
Lhom.funext (funext (λ _, rfl)) (funext (λ _, rfl))
lemma sum_elim_comp_inr (ψ : L'' →ᴸ L') :
(ϕ.sum_elim ψ) ∘ Lhom.sum_inr = ψ :=
Lhom.funext (funext (λ _, rfl)) (funext (λ _, rfl))
theorem sum_elim_inl_inr :
(Lhom.sum_inl).sum_elim (Lhom.sum_inr) = Lhom.id (L.sum L') :=
Lhom.funext (funext (λ _, sum.elim_inl_inr)) (funext (λ _, sum.elim_inl_inr))
theorem comp_sum_elim {L3 : language} (θ : L' →ᴸ L3) :
θ ∘ (ϕ.sum_elim ψ) = (θ ∘ ϕ).sum_elim (θ ∘ ψ) :=
Lhom.funext (funext (λ n, sum.comp_elim _ _ _)) (funext (λ n, sum.comp_elim _ _ _))
end sum_elim
section sum_map
variables {L₁ L₂ : language} (ψ : L₁ →ᴸ L₂)
/-- The map between two sum-languages induced by maps on the two factors. -/
@[simps] def sum_map : L.sum L₁ →ᴸ L'.sum L₂ :=
{ on_function := λ n, sum.map (λ f, ϕ.on_function f) (λ f, ψ.on_function f),
on_relation := λ n, sum.map (λ f, ϕ.on_relation f) (λ f, ψ.on_relation f) }
@[simp] lemma sum_map_comp_inl :
(ϕ.sum_map ψ) ∘ Lhom.sum_inl = Lhom.sum_inl ∘ ϕ :=
Lhom.funext (funext (λ _, rfl)) (funext (λ _, rfl))
@[simp] lemma sum_map_comp_inr :
(ϕ.sum_map ψ) ∘ Lhom.sum_inr = Lhom.sum_inr ∘ ψ :=
Lhom.funext (funext (λ _, rfl)) (funext (λ _, rfl))
end sum_map
/-- A language homomorphism is injective when all the maps between symbol types are. -/
protected structure injective : Prop :=
(on_function {n} : function.injective (λ f : L.functions n, on_function ϕ f))
(on_relation {n} : function.injective (λ R : L.relations n, on_relation ϕ R))
/-- Pulls a `L`-structure along a language map `ϕ : L →ᴸ L'`, and then expands it
to an `L'`-structure arbitrarily. -/
noncomputable def default_expansion (ϕ : L →ᴸ L')
[∀ n (f : L'.functions n), decidable (f ∈ set.range (λ (f : L.functions n), on_function ϕ f))]
[∀ n (r : L'.relations n), decidable (r ∈ set.range (λ (r : L.relations n), on_relation ϕ r))]
(M : Type*) [inhabited M] [L.Structure M] : L'.Structure M :=
{ fun_map := λ n f xs, if h' : f ∈ set.range (λ (f : L.functions n), on_function ϕ f) then
fun_map h'.some xs else default,
rel_map := λ n r xs, if h' : r ∈ set.range (λ (r : L.relations n), on_relation ϕ r) then
rel_map h'.some xs else default }
/-- A language homomorphism is an expansion on a structure if it commutes with the interpretation of
all symbols on that structure. -/
class is_expansion_on (M : Type*) [L.Structure M] [L'.Structure M] : Prop :=
(map_on_function : ∀ {n} (f : L.functions n) (x : fin n → M),
fun_map (ϕ.on_function f) x = fun_map f x)
(map_on_relation : ∀ {n} (R : L.relations n) (x : fin n → M),
rel_map (ϕ.on_relation R) x = rel_map R x)
@[simp] lemma map_on_function {M : Type*}
[L.Structure M] [L'.Structure M] [ϕ.is_expansion_on M]
{n} (f : L.functions n) (x : fin n → M) :
fun_map (ϕ.on_function f) x = fun_map f x :=
is_expansion_on.map_on_function f x
@[simp] lemma map_on_relation {M : Type*}
[L.Structure M] [L'.Structure M] [ϕ.is_expansion_on M]
{n} (R : L.relations n) (x : fin n → M) :
rel_map (ϕ.on_relation R) x = rel_map R x :=
is_expansion_on.map_on_relation R x
instance id_is_expansion_on (M : Type*) [L.Structure M] : is_expansion_on (Lhom.id L) M :=
⟨λ _ _ _, rfl, λ _ _ _, rfl⟩
instance of_is_empty_is_expansion_on (M : Type*) [L.Structure M] [L'.Structure M]
[L.is_algebraic] [L.is_relational] :
is_expansion_on (Lhom.of_is_empty L L') M :=
⟨λ n, (is_relational.empty_functions n).elim, λ n, (is_algebraic.empty_relations n).elim⟩
instance sum_elim_is_expansion_on {L'' : language} (ψ : L'' →ᴸ L') (M : Type*)
[L.Structure M] [L'.Structure M] [L''.Structure M]
[ϕ.is_expansion_on M] [ψ.is_expansion_on M] :
(ϕ.sum_elim ψ).is_expansion_on M :=
⟨λ _ f _, sum.cases_on f (by simp) (by simp), λ _ R _, sum.cases_on R (by simp) (by simp)⟩
instance sum_map_is_expansion_on {L₁ L₂ : language} (ψ : L₁ →ᴸ L₂) (M : Type*)
[L.Structure M] [L'.Structure M] [L₁.Structure M] [L₂.Structure M]
[ϕ.is_expansion_on M] [ψ.is_expansion_on M] :
(ϕ.sum_map ψ).is_expansion_on M :=
⟨λ _ f _, sum.cases_on f (by simp) (by simp), λ _ R _, sum.cases_on R (by simp) (by simp)⟩
instance sum_inl_is_expansion_on (M : Type*)
[L.Structure M] [L'.Structure M] :
(Lhom.sum_inl : L →ᴸ L.sum L').is_expansion_on M :=
⟨λ _ f _, rfl, λ _ R _, rfl⟩
instance sum_inr_is_expansion_on (M : Type*)
[L.Structure M] [L'.Structure M] :
(Lhom.sum_inr : L' →ᴸ L.sum L').is_expansion_on M :=
⟨λ _ f _, rfl, λ _ R _, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma fun_map_sum_inl [(L.sum L').Structure M]
[(Lhom.sum_inl : L →ᴸ L.sum L').is_expansion_on M]
{n} {f : L.functions n} {x : fin n → M} :
@fun_map (L.sum L') M _ n (sum.inl f) x = fun_map f x :=
(Lhom.sum_inl : L →ᴸ L.sum L').map_on_function f x
@[simp] lemma fun_map_sum_inr [(L'.sum L).Structure M]
[(Lhom.sum_inr : L →ᴸ L'.sum L).is_expansion_on M]
{n} {f : L.functions n} {x : fin n → M} :
@fun_map (L'.sum L) M _ n (sum.inr f) x = fun_map f x :=
(Lhom.sum_inr : L →ᴸ L'.sum L).map_on_function f x
lemma sum_inl_injective : (Lhom.sum_inl : L →ᴸ L.sum L').injective :=
⟨λ n, sum.inl_injective, λ n, sum.inl_injective⟩
lemma sum_inr_injective : (Lhom.sum_inr : L' →ᴸ L.sum L').injective :=
⟨λ n, sum.inr_injective, λ n, sum.inr_injective⟩
@[priority 100] instance is_expansion_on_reduct (ϕ : L →ᴸ L') (M : Type*) [L'.Structure M] :
@is_expansion_on L L' ϕ M (ϕ.reduct M) _ :=
begin
letI := ϕ.reduct M,
exact ⟨λ _ f _, rfl, λ _ R _, rfl⟩,
end
lemma injective.is_expansion_on_default {ϕ : L →ᴸ L'}
[∀ n (f : L'.functions n), decidable (f ∈ set.range (λ (f : L.functions n), on_function ϕ f))]
[∀ n (r : L'.relations n), decidable (r ∈ set.range (λ (r : L.relations n), on_relation ϕ r))]
(h : ϕ.injective) (M : Type*) [inhabited M] [L.Structure M] :
@is_expansion_on L L' ϕ M _ (ϕ.default_expansion M) :=
begin
letI := ϕ.default_expansion M,
refine ⟨λ n f xs, _, λ n r xs, _⟩,
{ have hf : ϕ.on_function f ∈ set.range (λ (f : L.functions n), ϕ.on_function f) := ⟨f, rfl⟩,
refine (dif_pos hf).trans _,
rw h.on_function hf.some_spec },
{ have hr : ϕ.on_relation r ∈ set.range (λ (r : L.relations n), ϕ.on_relation r) := ⟨r, rfl⟩,
refine (dif_pos hr).trans _,
rw h.on_relation hr.some_spec },
end
end Lhom
/-- A language equivalence maps the symbols of one language to symbols of another bijectively. -/
structure Lequiv (L L' : language) :=
(to_Lhom : L →ᴸ L')
(inv_Lhom : L' →ᴸ L)
(left_inv : inv_Lhom.comp to_Lhom = Lhom.id L)
(right_inv : to_Lhom.comp inv_Lhom = Lhom.id L')
infix ` ≃ᴸ `:10 := Lequiv -- \^L
namespace Lequiv
variable (L)
/-- The identity equivalence from a first-order language to itself. -/
@[simps] protected def refl : L ≃ᴸ L :=
⟨Lhom.id L, Lhom.id L, Lhom.id_comp _, Lhom.id_comp _⟩
variable {L}
instance : inhabited (L ≃ᴸ L) := ⟨Lequiv.refl L⟩
variables {L'' : language} (e' : L' ≃ᴸ L'') (e : L ≃ᴸ L')
/-- The inverse of an equivalence of first-order languages. -/
@[simps] protected def symm : L' ≃ᴸ L :=
⟨e.inv_Lhom, e.to_Lhom, e.right_inv, e.left_inv⟩
/-- The composition of equivalences of first-order languages. -/
@[simps, trans] protected def trans (e : L ≃ᴸ L') (e' : L' ≃ᴸ L'') : L ≃ᴸ L'' :=
⟨e'.to_Lhom.comp e.to_Lhom, e.inv_Lhom.comp e'.inv_Lhom,
by rw [Lhom.comp_assoc, ← Lhom.comp_assoc e'.inv_Lhom, e'.left_inv, Lhom.id_comp, e.left_inv],
by rw [Lhom.comp_assoc, ← Lhom.comp_assoc e.to_Lhom, e.right_inv, Lhom.id_comp, e'.right_inv]⟩
end Lequiv
section constants_on
variables (α : Type u')
/-- A language with constants indexed by a type. -/
@[simp] def constants_on : language.{u' 0} :=
language.mk₂ α pempty pempty pempty pempty
variables {α}
lemma constants_on_constants : (constants_on α).constants = α := rfl
instance is_algebraic_constants_on : is_algebraic (constants_on α) :=
language.is_algebraic_mk₂
instance is_relational_constants_on [ie : is_empty α] : is_relational (constants_on α) :=
language.is_relational_mk₂
instance is_empty_functions_constants_on_succ {n : ℕ} :
is_empty ((constants_on α).functions (n + 1)) :=
nat.cases_on n pempty.is_empty (λ n, nat.cases_on n pempty.is_empty (λ _, pempty.is_empty))
lemma card_constants_on : (constants_on α).card = # α :=
by simp
/-- Gives a `constants_on α` structure to a type by assigning each constant a value. -/
def constants_on.Structure (f : α → M) : (constants_on α).Structure M :=
Structure.mk₂ f pempty.elim pempty.elim pempty.elim pempty.elim
variables {β : Type v'}
/-- A map between index types induces a map between constant languages. -/
def Lhom.constants_on_map (f : α → β) : (constants_on α) →ᴸ (constants_on β) :=
Lhom.mk₂ f pempty.elim pempty.elim pempty.elim pempty.elim
lemma constants_on_map_is_expansion_on {f : α → β} {fα : α → M} {fβ : β → M}
(h : fβ ∘ f = fα) :
@Lhom.is_expansion_on _ _ (Lhom.constants_on_map f) M
(constants_on.Structure fα) (constants_on.Structure fβ) :=
begin
letI := constants_on.Structure fα,
letI := constants_on.Structure fβ,
exact ⟨λ n, nat.cases_on n (λ F x, (congr_fun h F : _)) (λ n F, is_empty_elim F),
λ _ R, is_empty_elim R⟩
end
end constants_on
section with_constants
variable (L)
section
variables (α : Type w')
/-- Extends a language with a constant for each element of a parameter set in `M`. -/
def with_constants : language.{(max u w') v} := L.sum (constants_on α)
localized "notation (name := language.with_constants)
L`[[`:95 α`]]`:90 := L.with_constants α" in first_order
@[simp] lemma card_with_constants :
(L[[α]]).card = cardinal.lift.{w'} L.card + cardinal.lift.{max u v} (# α) :=
by rw [with_constants, card_sum, card_constants_on]
/-- The language map adding constants. -/
@[simps] def Lhom_with_constants : L →ᴸ L[[α]] := Lhom.sum_inl
lemma Lhom_with_constants_injective : (L.Lhom_with_constants α).injective :=
Lhom.sum_inl_injective
variables {α}
/-- The constant symbol indexed by a particular element. -/
protected def con (a : α) : L[[α]].constants := sum.inr a
variables {L} (α)
/-- Adds constants to a language map. -/
def Lhom.add_constants {L' : language} (φ : L →ᴸ L') :
L[[α]] →ᴸ L'[[α]] := φ.sum_map (Lhom.id _)
instance params_Structure (A : set α) : (constants_on A).Structure α := constants_on.Structure coe
variables (L) (α)
/-- The language map removing an empty constant set. -/
@[simps] def Lequiv.add_empty_constants [ie : is_empty α] : L ≃ᴸ L[[α]] :=
{ to_Lhom := Lhom_with_constants L α,
inv_Lhom := Lhom.sum_elim (Lhom.id L) (Lhom.of_is_empty (constants_on α) L),
left_inv := by rw [Lhom_with_constants, Lhom.sum_elim_comp_inl],
right_inv := by { simp only [Lhom.comp_sum_elim, Lhom_with_constants, Lhom.comp_id],
exact trans (congr rfl (subsingleton.elim _ _)) Lhom.sum_elim_inl_inr } }
variables {α} {β : Type*}
@[simp] lemma with_constants_fun_map_sum_inl [L[[α]].Structure M]
[(Lhom_with_constants L α).is_expansion_on M]
{n} {f : L.functions n} {x : fin n → M} :
@fun_map (L[[α]]) M _ n (sum.inl f) x = fun_map f x :=
(Lhom_with_constants L α).map_on_function f x
@[simp] lemma with_constants_rel_map_sum_inl [L[[α]].Structure M]
[(Lhom_with_constants L α).is_expansion_on M]
{n} {R : L.relations n} {x : fin n → M} :
@rel_map (L[[α]]) M _ n (sum.inl R) x = rel_map R x :=
(Lhom_with_constants L α).map_on_relation R x
/-- The language map extending the constant set. -/
def Lhom_with_constants_map (f : α → β) : L[[α]] →ᴸ L[[β]] :=
Lhom.sum_map (Lhom.id L) (Lhom.constants_on_map f)
@[simp] lemma Lhom.map_constants_comp_sum_inl {f : α → β} :
(L.Lhom_with_constants_map f).comp (Lhom.sum_inl) = L.Lhom_with_constants β :=
by ext n f R; refl
end
open_locale first_order
instance constants_on_self_Structure : (constants_on M).Structure M :=
constants_on.Structure id
instance with_constants_self_Structure : L[[M]].Structure M :=
language.sum_Structure _ _ M
instance with_constants_self_expansion : (Lhom_with_constants L M).is_expansion_on M :=
⟨λ _ _ _, rfl, λ _ _ _, rfl⟩
variables (α : Type*) [(constants_on α).Structure M]
instance with_constants_Structure : L[[α]].Structure M :=
language.sum_Structure _ _ _
instance with_constants_expansion : (L.Lhom_with_constants α).is_expansion_on M :=
⟨λ _ _ _, rfl, λ _ _ _, rfl⟩
instance add_empty_constants_is_expansion_on' :
(Lequiv.add_empty_constants L (∅ : set M)).to_Lhom.is_expansion_on M :=
L.with_constants_expansion _
instance add_empty_constants_symm_is_expansion_on :
(Lequiv.add_empty_constants L (∅ : set M)).symm.to_Lhom.is_expansion_on M :=
Lhom.sum_elim_is_expansion_on _ _ _
instance add_constants_expansion {L' : language} [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L')
[φ.is_expansion_on M] :
(φ.add_constants α).is_expansion_on M :=
Lhom.sum_map_is_expansion_on _ _ M
@[simp] lemma with_constants_fun_map_sum_inr {a : α} {x : fin 0 → M} :
@fun_map (L[[α]]) M _ 0 (sum.inr a : L[[α]].functions 0) x = L.con a :=
begin
rw unique.eq_default x,
exact (Lhom.sum_inr : (constants_on α) →ᴸ L.sum _).map_on_function _ _,
end
variables {α} (A : set M)
@[simp] lemma coe_con {a : A} : ((L.con a) : M) = a := rfl
variables {A} {B : set M} (h : A ⊆ B)
instance constants_on_map_inclusion_is_expansion_on :
(Lhom.constants_on_map (set.inclusion h)).is_expansion_on M :=
constants_on_map_is_expansion_on rfl
instance map_constants_inclusion_is_expansion_on :
(L.Lhom_with_constants_map (set.inclusion h)).is_expansion_on M :=
Lhom.sum_map_is_expansion_on _ _ _
end with_constants
end language
end first_order
|
b448e83aa001e5940af8c15bff3db5749ece8606 | 36c7a18fd72e5b57229bd8ba36493daf536a19ce | /tests/lean/run/blast2.lean | 259f07084693061aad53f14b187634f7577dcf49 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | YHVHvx/lean | 732bf0fb7a298cd7fe0f15d82f8e248c11db49e9 | 038369533e0136dd395dc252084d3c1853accbf2 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,701,080,210 | 1,449,128,595,000 | 1,449,128,595,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 113 | lean | example (a b : Prop) : forall (Ha : a) (Hb : b), a :=
by blast
example (a b : Prop) : a → b → a :=
by blast
|
0de9507750fd40164db27802dd6955e99c2a5341 | 53618200bef52920c1e974173f78cd378d268f3e | /hott/cubical/square.hlean | a182181f3f9f123b72c1d862f06a07d34e35fa4c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | sayantangkhan/lean2 | cc41e61102e0fcc8b65e8501186dcca40b19b22e | 0fc0378969678eec25ea425a426bb48a184a6db0 | refs/heads/master | 1,590,323,112,724 | 1,489,425,932,000 | 1,489,425,932,000 | 84,854,525 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,489,425,509,000 | 1,489,425,509,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 31,937 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Jakob von Raumer
Squares in a type
-/
import types.eq
open eq equiv is_equiv sigma
namespace eq
variables {A B : Type} {a a' a'' a₀₀ a₂₀ a₄₀ a₀₂ a₂₂ a₂₄ a₀₄ a₄₂ a₄₄ a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ : A}
/-a₀₀-/ {p₁₀ p₁₀' : a₀₀ = a₂₀} /-a₂₀-/ {p₃₀ : a₂₀ = a₄₀} /-a₄₀-/
{p₀₁ p₀₁' : a₀₀ = a₀₂} /-s₁₁-/ {p₂₁ p₂₁' : a₂₀ = a₂₂} /-s₃₁-/ {p₄₁ : a₄₀ = a₄₂}
/-a₀₂-/ {p₁₂ p₁₂' : a₀₂ = a₂₂} /-a₂₂-/ {p₃₂ : a₂₂ = a₄₂} /-a₄₂-/
{p₀₃ : a₀₂ = a₀₄} /-s₁₃-/ {p₂₃ : a₂₂ = a₂₄} /-s₃₃-/ {p₄₃ : a₄₂ = a₄₄}
/-a₀₄-/ {p₁₄ : a₀₄ = a₂₄} /-a₂₄-/ {p₃₄ : a₂₄ = a₄₄} /-a₄₄-/
inductive square {A : Type} {a₀₀ : A}
: Π{a₂₀ a₀₂ a₂₂ : A}, a₀₀ = a₂₀ → a₀₂ = a₂₂ → a₀₀ = a₀₂ → a₂₀ = a₂₂ → Type :=
ids : square idp idp idp idp
/- square top bottom left right -/
variables {s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁} {s₃₁ : square p₃₀ p₃₂ p₂₁ p₄₁}
{s₁₃ : square p₁₂ p₁₄ p₀₃ p₂₃} {s₃₃ : square p₃₂ p₃₄ p₂₃ p₄₃}
definition ids [reducible] [constructor] := @square.ids
definition idsquare [reducible] [constructor] (a : A) := @square.ids A a
definition hrefl [unfold 4] (p : a = a') : square idp idp p p :=
by induction p; exact ids
definition vrefl [unfold 4] (p : a = a') : square p p idp idp :=
by induction p; exact ids
definition hrfl [reducible] [unfold 4] {p : a = a'} : square idp idp p p :=
!hrefl
definition vrfl [reducible] [unfold 4] {p : a = a'} : square p p idp idp :=
!vrefl
definition hdeg_square [unfold 6] {p q : a = a'} (r : p = q) : square idp idp p q :=
by induction r;apply hrefl
definition vdeg_square [unfold 6] {p q : a = a'} (r : p = q) : square p q idp idp :=
by induction r;apply vrefl
definition hdeg_square_idp (p : a = a') : hdeg_square (refl p) = hrfl :=
by reflexivity
definition vdeg_square_idp (p : a = a') : vdeg_square (refl p) = vrfl :=
by reflexivity
definition hconcat [unfold 16] (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) (s₃₁ : square p₃₀ p₃₂ p₂₁ p₄₁)
: square (p₁₀ ⬝ p₃₀) (p₁₂ ⬝ p₃₂) p₀₁ p₄₁ :=
by induction s₃₁; exact s₁₁
definition vconcat [unfold 16] (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) (s₁₃ : square p₁₂ p₁₄ p₀₃ p₂₃)
: square p₁₀ p₁₄ (p₀₁ ⬝ p₀₃) (p₂₁ ⬝ p₂₃) :=
by induction s₁₃; exact s₁₁
definition dconcat [unfold 14] {p₀₀ : a₀₀ = a} {p₂₂ : a = a₂₂}
(s₂₁ : square p₀₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₂) (s₁₂ : square p₁₀ p₂₂ p₀₀ p₂₁) : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction s₁₂; exact s₂₁
definition hinverse [unfold 10] (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) : square p₁₀⁻¹ p₁₂⁻¹ p₂₁ p₀₁ :=
by induction s₁₁;exact ids
definition vinverse [unfold 10] (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) : square p₁₂ p₁₀ p₀₁⁻¹ p₂₁⁻¹ :=
by induction s₁₁;exact ids
definition eq_vconcat [unfold 11] {p : a₀₀ = a₂₀} (r : p = p₁₀) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) :
square p p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction r; exact s₁₁
definition vconcat_eq [unfold 12] {p : a₀₂ = a₂₂} (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) (r : p₁₂ = p) :
square p₁₀ p p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction r; exact s₁₁
definition eq_hconcat [unfold 11] {p : a₀₀ = a₀₂} (r : p = p₀₁) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) :
square p₁₀ p₁₂ p p₂₁ :=
by induction r; exact s₁₁
definition hconcat_eq [unfold 12] {p : a₂₀ = a₂₂} (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) (r : p₂₁ = p) :
square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p :=
by induction r; exact s₁₁
infix ` ⬝h `:69 := hconcat --type using \tr
infix ` ⬝v `:70 := vconcat --type using \tr
infix ` ⬝hp `:71 := hconcat_eq --type using \tr
infix ` ⬝vp `:73 := vconcat_eq --type using \tr
infix ` ⬝ph `:72 := eq_hconcat --type using \tr
infix ` ⬝pv `:74 := eq_vconcat --type using \tr
postfix `⁻¹ʰ`:(max+1) := hinverse --type using \-1h
postfix `⁻¹ᵛ`:(max+1) := vinverse --type using \-1v
definition transpose [unfold 10] (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) : square p₀₁ p₂₁ p₁₀ p₁₂ :=
by induction s₁₁;exact ids
definition aps [unfold 12] (f : A → B) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square (ap f p₁₀) (ap f p₁₂) (ap f p₀₁) (ap f p₂₁) :=
by induction s₁₁;exact ids
/- canceling, whiskering and moving thinks along the sides of the square -/
definition whisker_tl (p : a = a₀₀) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square (p ⬝ p₁₀) p₁₂ (p ⬝ p₀₁) p₂₁ :=
by induction s₁₁;induction p;constructor
definition whisker_br (p : a₂₂ = a) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square p₁₀ (p₁₂ ⬝ p) p₀₁ (p₂₁ ⬝ p) :=
by induction p;exact s₁₁
definition whisker_rt (p : a = a₂₀) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square (p₁₀ ⬝ p⁻¹) p₁₂ p₀₁ (p ⬝ p₂₁) :=
by induction s₁₁;induction p;constructor
definition whisker_tr (p : a₂₀ = a) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square (p₁₀ ⬝ p) p₁₂ p₀₁ (p⁻¹ ⬝ p₂₁) :=
by induction s₁₁;induction p;constructor
definition whisker_bl (p : a = a₀₂) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square p₁₀ (p ⬝ p₁₂) (p₀₁ ⬝ p⁻¹) p₂₁ :=
by induction s₁₁;induction p;constructor
definition whisker_lb (p : a₀₂ = a) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square p₁₀ (p⁻¹ ⬝ p₁₂) (p₀₁ ⬝ p) p₂₁ :=
by induction s₁₁;induction p;constructor
definition cancel_tl (p : a = a₀₀) (s₁₁ : square (p ⬝ p₁₀) p₁₂ (p ⬝ p₀₁) p₂₁)
: square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction p; rewrite +idp_con at s₁₁; exact s₁₁
definition cancel_br (p : a₂₂ = a) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ (p₁₂ ⬝ p) p₀₁ (p₂₁ ⬝ p))
: square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction p;exact s₁₁
definition cancel_rt (p : a = a₂₀) (s₁₁ : square (p₁₀ ⬝ p⁻¹) p₁₂ p₀₁ (p ⬝ p₂₁))
: square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction p; rewrite idp_con at s₁₁; exact s₁₁
definition cancel_tr (p : a₂₀ = a) (s₁₁ : square (p₁₀ ⬝ p) p₁₂ p₀₁ (p⁻¹ ⬝ p₂₁))
: square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction p; rewrite [▸* at s₁₁,idp_con at s₁₁]; exact s₁₁
definition cancel_bl (p : a = a₀₂) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ (p ⬝ p₁₂) (p₀₁ ⬝ p⁻¹) p₂₁)
: square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction p; rewrite idp_con at s₁₁; exact s₁₁
definition cancel_lb (p : a₀₂ = a) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ (p⁻¹ ⬝ p₁₂) (p₀₁ ⬝ p) p₂₁)
: square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction p; rewrite [▸* at s₁₁,idp_con at s₁₁]; exact s₁₁
definition move_top_of_left {p : a₀₀ = a} {q : a = a₀₂} (s : square p₁₀ p₁₂ (p ⬝ q) p₂₁)
: square (p⁻¹ ⬝ p₁₀) p₁₂ q p₂₁ :=
by apply cancel_tl p; rewrite con_inv_cancel_left; exact s
definition move_top_of_left' {p : a = a₀₀} {q : a = a₀₂} (s : square p₁₀ p₁₂ (p⁻¹ ⬝ q) p₂₁)
: square (p ⬝ p₁₀) p₁₂ q p₂₁ :=
by apply cancel_tl p⁻¹; rewrite inv_con_cancel_left; exact s
definition move_left_of_top {p : a₀₀ = a} {q : a = a₂₀} (s : square (p ⬝ q) p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square q p₁₂ (p⁻¹ ⬝ p₀₁) p₂₁ :=
by apply cancel_tl p; rewrite con_inv_cancel_left; exact s
definition move_left_of_top' {p : a = a₀₀} {q : a = a₂₀} (s : square (p⁻¹ ⬝ q) p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square q p₁₂ (p ⬝ p₀₁) p₂₁ :=
by apply cancel_tl p⁻¹; rewrite inv_con_cancel_left; exact s
definition move_bot_of_right {p : a₂₀ = a} {q : a = a₂₂} (s : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ (p ⬝ q))
: square p₁₀ (p₁₂ ⬝ q⁻¹) p₀₁ p :=
by apply cancel_br q; rewrite inv_con_cancel_right; exact s
definition move_bot_of_right' {p : a₂₀ = a} {q : a₂₂ = a} (s : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ (p ⬝ q⁻¹))
: square p₁₀ (p₁₂ ⬝ q) p₀₁ p :=
by apply cancel_br q⁻¹; rewrite con_inv_cancel_right; exact s
definition move_right_of_bot {p : a₀₂ = a} {q : a = a₂₂} (s : square p₁₀ (p ⬝ q) p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square p₁₀ p p₀₁ (p₂₁ ⬝ q⁻¹) :=
by apply cancel_br q; rewrite inv_con_cancel_right; exact s
definition move_right_of_bot' {p : a₀₂ = a} {q : a₂₂ = a} (s : square p₁₀ (p ⬝ q⁻¹) p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square p₁₀ p p₀₁ (p₂₁ ⬝ q) :=
by apply cancel_br q⁻¹; rewrite con_inv_cancel_right; exact s
definition move_top_of_right {p : a₂₀ = a} {q : a = a₂₂} (s : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ (p ⬝ q))
: square (p₁₀ ⬝ p) p₁₂ p₀₁ q :=
by apply cancel_rt p; rewrite con_inv_cancel_right; exact s
definition move_right_of_top {p : a₀₀ = a} {q : a = a₂₀} (s : square (p ⬝ q) p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square p p₁₂ p₀₁ (q ⬝ p₂₁) :=
by apply cancel_tr q; rewrite inv_con_cancel_left; exact s
definition move_bot_of_left {p : a₀₀ = a} {q : a = a₀₂} (s : square p₁₀ p₁₂ (p ⬝ q) p₂₁)
: square p₁₀ (q ⬝ p₁₂) p p₂₁ :=
by apply cancel_lb q; rewrite inv_con_cancel_left; exact s
definition move_left_of_bot {p : a₀₂ = a} {q : a = a₂₂} (s : square p₁₀ (p ⬝ q) p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square p₁₀ q (p₀₁ ⬝ p) p₂₁ :=
by apply cancel_bl p; rewrite con_inv_cancel_right; exact s
/- some higher ∞-groupoid operations -/
definition vconcat_vrfl (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: s₁₁ ⬝v vrefl p₁₂ = s₁₁ :=
by induction s₁₁; reflexivity
definition hconcat_hrfl (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: s₁₁ ⬝h hrefl p₂₁ = s₁₁ :=
by induction s₁₁; reflexivity
/- equivalences -/
definition eq_of_square [unfold 10] (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) : p₁₀ ⬝ p₂₁ = p₀₁ ⬝ p₁₂ :=
by induction s₁₁; apply idp
definition square_of_eq (r : p₁₀ ⬝ p₂₁ = p₀₁ ⬝ p₁₂) : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction p₁₂; esimp at r; induction r; induction p₂₁; induction p₁₀; exact ids
definition eq_top_of_square [unfold 10] (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: p₁₀ = p₀₁ ⬝ p₁₂ ⬝ p₂₁⁻¹ :=
by induction s₁₁; apply idp
definition square_of_eq_top (r : p₁₀ = p₀₁ ⬝ p₁₂ ⬝ p₂₁⁻¹) : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction p₂₁; induction p₁₂; esimp at r;induction r;induction p₁₀;exact ids
definition eq_bot_of_square [unfold 10] (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: p₁₂ = p₀₁⁻¹ ⬝ p₁₀ ⬝ p₂₁ :=
by induction s₁₁; apply idp
definition square_of_eq_bot (r : p₀₁⁻¹ ⬝ p₁₀ ⬝ p₂₁ = p₁₂) : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction p₂₁; induction p₁₀; esimp at r; induction r; induction p₀₁; exact ids
definition square_equiv_eq [constructor] (t : a₀₀ = a₀₂) (b : a₂₀ = a₂₂)
(l : a₀₀ = a₂₀) (r : a₀₂ = a₂₂) : square t b l r ≃ t ⬝ r = l ⬝ b :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ exact eq_of_square},
{ exact square_of_eq},
{ intro s, induction b, esimp [concat] at s, induction s, induction r, induction t, apply idp},
{ intro s, induction s, apply idp},
end
definition hdeg_square_equiv' [constructor] (p q : a = a') : square idp idp p q ≃ p = q :=
by transitivity _;apply square_equiv_eq;transitivity _;apply eq_equiv_eq_symm;
apply equiv_eq_closed_right;apply idp_con
definition vdeg_square_equiv' [constructor] (p q : a = a') : square p q idp idp ≃ p = q :=
by transitivity _;apply square_equiv_eq;apply equiv_eq_closed_right; apply idp_con
definition eq_of_hdeg_square [reducible] {p q : a = a'} (s : square idp idp p q) : p = q :=
to_fun !hdeg_square_equiv' s
definition eq_of_vdeg_square [reducible] {p q : a = a'} (s : square p q idp idp) : p = q :=
to_fun !vdeg_square_equiv' s
definition top_deg_square (l : a₁ = a₂) (b : a₂ = a₃) (r : a₄ = a₃)
: square (l ⬝ b ⬝ r⁻¹) b l r :=
by induction r;induction b;induction l;constructor
definition bot_deg_square (l : a₁ = a₂) (t : a₁ = a₃) (r : a₃ = a₄)
: square t (l⁻¹ ⬝ t ⬝ r) l r :=
by induction r;induction t;induction l;constructor
/-
the following two equivalences have as underlying inverse function the functions
hdeg_square and vdeg_square, respectively.
See example below the definition
-/
definition hdeg_square_equiv [constructor] (p q : a = a') :
square idp idp p q ≃ p = q :=
begin
fapply equiv_change_fun,
{ fapply equiv_change_inv, apply hdeg_square_equiv', exact hdeg_square,
intro s, induction s, induction p, reflexivity},
{ exact eq_of_hdeg_square},
{ reflexivity}
end
definition vdeg_square_equiv [constructor] (p q : a = a') :
square p q idp idp ≃ p = q :=
begin
fapply equiv_change_fun,
{ fapply equiv_change_inv, apply vdeg_square_equiv',exact vdeg_square,
intro s, induction s, induction p, reflexivity},
{ exact eq_of_vdeg_square},
{ reflexivity}
end
example (p q : a = a') : to_inv (hdeg_square_equiv p q) = hdeg_square := idp
/-
characterization of pathovers in a equality type. The type B of the equality is fixed here.
A version where B may also varies over the path p is given in the file squareover
-/
definition eq_pathover [unfold 7] {f g : A → B} {p : a = a'} {q : f a = g a} {r : f a' = g a'}
(s : square q r (ap f p) (ap g p)) : q =[p] r :=
begin induction p, apply pathover_idp_of_eq, exact eq_of_vdeg_square s end
definition eq_pathover_constant_left {g : A → B} {p : a = a'} {b : B} {q : b = g a} {r : b = g a'}
(s : square q r idp (ap g p)) : q =[p] r :=
eq_pathover (ap_constant p b ⬝ph s)
definition eq_pathover_id_left {g : A → A} {p : a = a'} {q : a = g a} {r : a' = g a'}
(s : square q r p (ap g p)) : q =[p] r :=
eq_pathover (ap_id p ⬝ph s)
definition eq_pathover_constant_right {f : A → B} {p : a = a'} {b : B} {q : f a = b} {r : f a' = b}
(s : square q r (ap f p) idp) : q =[p] r :=
eq_pathover (s ⬝hp (ap_constant p b)⁻¹)
definition eq_pathover_id_right {f : A → A} {p : a = a'} {q : f a = a} {r : f a' = a'}
(s : square q r (ap f p) p) : q =[p] r :=
eq_pathover (s ⬝hp (ap_id p)⁻¹)
definition square_of_pathover [unfold 7]
{f g : A → B} {p : a = a'} {q : f a = g a} {r : f a' = g a'}
(s : q =[p] r) : square q r (ap f p) (ap g p) :=
by induction p;apply vdeg_square;exact eq_of_pathover_idp s
definition eq_pathover_constant_left_id_right {p : a = a'} {a₀ : A} {q : a₀ = a} {r : a₀ = a'}
(s : square q r idp p) : q =[p] r :=
eq_pathover (ap_constant p a₀ ⬝ph s ⬝hp (ap_id p)⁻¹)
definition eq_pathover_id_left_constant_right {p : a = a'} {a₀ : A} {q : a = a₀} {r : a' = a₀}
(s : square q r p idp) : q =[p] r :=
eq_pathover (ap_id p ⬝ph s ⬝hp (ap_constant p a₀)⁻¹)
definition loop_pathover {p : a = a'} {q : a = a} {r : a' = a'} (s : square q r p p) : q =[p] r :=
eq_pathover (ap_id p ⬝ph s ⬝hp (ap_id p)⁻¹)
/- interaction of equivalences with operations on squares -/
definition eq_pathover_equiv_square [constructor] {f g : A → B}
(p : a = a') (q : f a = g a) (r : f a' = g a') : q =[p] r ≃ square q r (ap f p) (ap g p) :=
equiv.MK square_of_pathover
eq_pathover
begin
intro s, induction p, esimp [square_of_pathover,eq_pathover],
exact ap vdeg_square (to_right_inv !pathover_idp (eq_of_vdeg_square s))
⬝ to_left_inv !vdeg_square_equiv s
end
begin
intro s, induction p, esimp [square_of_pathover,eq_pathover],
exact ap pathover_idp_of_eq (to_right_inv !vdeg_square_equiv (eq_of_pathover_idp s))
⬝ to_left_inv !pathover_idp s
end
definition square_of_pathover_eq_concato {f g : A → B} {p : a = a'} {q q' : f a = g a}
{r : f a' = g a'} (s' : q = q') (s : q' =[p] r)
: square_of_pathover (s' ⬝po s) = s' ⬝pv square_of_pathover s :=
by induction s;induction s';reflexivity
definition square_of_pathover_concato_eq {f g : A → B} {p : a = a'} {q : f a = g a}
{r r' : f a' = g a'} (s' : r = r') (s : q =[p] r)
: square_of_pathover (s ⬝op s') = square_of_pathover s ⬝vp s' :=
by induction s;induction s';reflexivity
definition square_of_pathover_concato {f g : A → B} {p : a = a'} {p' : a' = a''} {q : f a = g a}
{q' : f a' = g a'} {q'' : f a'' = g a''} (s : q =[p] q') (s' : q' =[p'] q'')
: square_of_pathover (s ⬝o s')
= ap_con f p p' ⬝ph (square_of_pathover s ⬝v square_of_pathover s') ⬝hp (ap_con g p p')⁻¹ :=
by induction s';induction s;esimp [ap_con,hconcat_eq];exact !vconcat_vrfl⁻¹
definition eq_of_square_hrfl [unfold 4] (p : a = a') : eq_of_square hrfl = idp_con p :=
by induction p;reflexivity
definition eq_of_square_vrfl [unfold 4] (p : a = a') : eq_of_square vrfl = (idp_con p)⁻¹ :=
by induction p;reflexivity
definition eq_of_square_hdeg_square {p q : a = a'} (r : p = q)
: eq_of_square (hdeg_square r) = !idp_con ⬝ r⁻¹ :=
by induction r;induction p;reflexivity
definition eq_of_square_vdeg_square {p q : a = a'} (r : p = q)
: eq_of_square (vdeg_square r) = r ⬝ !idp_con⁻¹ :=
by induction r;induction p;reflexivity
definition eq_of_square_eq_vconcat {p : a₀₀ = a₂₀} (r : p = p₁₀) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: eq_of_square (r ⬝pv s₁₁) = whisker_right p₂₁ r ⬝ eq_of_square s₁₁ :=
by induction s₁₁;cases r;reflexivity
definition eq_of_square_eq_hconcat {p : a₀₀ = a₀₂} (r : p = p₀₁) (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: eq_of_square (r ⬝ph s₁₁) = eq_of_square s₁₁ ⬝ (whisker_right p₁₂ r)⁻¹ :=
by induction r;reflexivity
definition eq_of_square_vconcat_eq {p : a₀₂ = a₂₂} (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) (r : p₁₂ = p)
: eq_of_square (s₁₁ ⬝vp r) = eq_of_square s₁₁ ⬝ whisker_left p₀₁ r :=
by induction r;reflexivity
definition eq_of_square_hconcat_eq {p : a₂₀ = a₂₂} (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) (r : p₂₁ = p)
: eq_of_square (s₁₁ ⬝hp r) = (whisker_left p₁₀ r)⁻¹ ⬝ eq_of_square s₁₁ :=
by induction s₁₁; induction r;reflexivity
definition change_path_eq_pathover {A B : Type} {a a' : A} {f g : A → B}
{p p' : a = a'} (r : p = p')
{q : f a = g a} {q' : f a' = g a'}
(s : square q q' (ap f p) (ap g p)) :
change_path r (eq_pathover s) = eq_pathover ((ap02 f r)⁻¹ ⬝ph s ⬝hp (ap02 g r)) :=
by induction r; reflexivity
definition eq_hconcat_hdeg_square {A : Type} {a a' : A} {p₁ p₂ p₃ : a = a'} (q₁ : p₁ = p₂)
(q₂ : p₂ = p₃) : q₁ ⬝ph hdeg_square q₂ = hdeg_square (q₁ ⬝ q₂) :=
by induction q₁; induction q₂; reflexivity
definition hdeg_square_hconcat_eq {A : Type} {a a' : A} {p₁ p₂ p₃ : a = a'} (q₁ : p₁ = p₂)
(q₂ : p₂ = p₃) : hdeg_square q₁ ⬝hp q₂ = hdeg_square (q₁ ⬝ q₂) :=
by induction q₁; induction q₂; reflexivity
definition eq_hconcat_eq_hdeg_square {A : Type} {a a' : A} {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : a = a'} (q₁ : p₁ = p₂)
(q₂ : p₂ = p₃) (q₃ : p₃ = p₄) : q₁ ⬝ph hdeg_square q₂ ⬝hp q₃ = hdeg_square (q₁ ⬝ q₂ ⬝ q₃) :=
by induction q₃; apply eq_hconcat_hdeg_square
-- definition vconcat_eq [unfold 11] {p : a₀₂ = a₂₂} (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) (r : p₁₂ = p) :
-- square p₁₀ p p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
-- by induction r; exact s₁₁
-- definition eq_hconcat [unfold 11] {p : a₀₀ = a₀₂} (r : p = p₀₁)
-- (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p p₂₁ :=
-- by induction r; exact s₁₁
-- definition hconcat_eq [unfold 11] {p : a₂₀ = a₂₂}
-- (s₁₁ : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) (r : p₂₁ = p) : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p :=
-- by induction r; exact s₁₁
-- the following definition is very slow, maybe it's interesting to see why?
-- definition eq_pathover_equiv_square' {f g : A → B}(p : a = a') (q : f a = g a) (r : f a' = g a')
-- : square q r (ap f p) (ap g p) ≃ q =[p] r :=
-- equiv.MK eq_pathover
-- square_of_pathover
-- (λs, begin
-- induction p, rewrite [↑[square_of_pathover,eq_pathover],
-- to_right_inv !vdeg_square_equiv (eq_of_pathover_idp s),
-- to_left_inv !pathover_idp s]
-- end)
-- (λs, begin
-- induction p, rewrite [↑[square_of_pathover,eq_pathover],▸*,
-- to_right_inv !(@pathover_idp A) (eq_of_vdeg_square s),
-- to_left_inv !vdeg_square_equiv s]
-- end)
/- recursors for squares where some sides are reflexivity -/
definition rec_on_b [recursor] {a₀₀ : A}
{P : Π{a₂₀ a₁₂ : A} {t : a₀₀ = a₂₀} {l : a₀₀ = a₁₂} {r : a₂₀ = a₁₂}, square t idp l r → Type}
{a₂₀ a₁₂ : A} {t : a₀₀ = a₂₀} {l : a₀₀ = a₁₂} {r : a₂₀ = a₁₂}
(s : square t idp l r) (H : P ids) : P s :=
have H2 : P (square_of_eq (eq_of_square s)),
from eq.rec_on (eq_of_square s : t ⬝ r = l) (by induction r; induction t; exact H),
left_inv (to_fun !square_equiv_eq) s ▸ H2
definition rec_on_r [recursor] {a₀₀ : A}
{P : Π{a₀₂ a₂₁ : A} {t : a₀₀ = a₂₁} {b : a₀₂ = a₂₁} {l : a₀₀ = a₀₂}, square t b l idp → Type}
{a₀₂ a₂₁ : A} {t : a₀₀ = a₂₁} {b : a₀₂ = a₂₁} {l : a₀₀ = a₀₂}
(s : square t b l idp) (H : P ids) : P s :=
let p : l ⬝ b = t := (eq_of_square s)⁻¹ in
have H2 : P (square_of_eq (eq_of_square s)⁻¹⁻¹),
from @eq.rec_on _ _ (λx p, P (square_of_eq p⁻¹)) _ p (by induction b; induction l; exact H),
left_inv (to_fun !square_equiv_eq) s ▸ !inv_inv ▸ H2
definition rec_on_l [recursor] {a₀₁ : A}
{P : Π {a₂₀ a₂₂ : A} {t : a₀₁ = a₂₀} {b : a₀₁ = a₂₂} {r : a₂₀ = a₂₂},
square t b idp r → Type}
{a₂₀ a₂₂ : A} {t : a₀₁ = a₂₀} {b : a₀₁ = a₂₂} {r : a₂₀ = a₂₂}
(s : square t b idp r) (H : P ids) : P s :=
let p : t ⬝ r = b := eq_of_square s ⬝ !idp_con in
have H2 : P (square_of_eq (p ⬝ !idp_con⁻¹)),
from eq.rec_on p (by induction r; induction t; exact H),
left_inv (to_fun !square_equiv_eq) s ▸ !con_inv_cancel_right ▸ H2
definition rec_on_t [recursor] {a₁₀ : A}
{P : Π {a₀₂ a₂₂ : A} {b : a₀₂ = a₂₂} {l : a₁₀ = a₀₂} {r : a₁₀ = a₂₂}, square idp b l r → Type}
{a₀₂ a₂₂ : A} {b : a₀₂ = a₂₂} {l : a₁₀ = a₀₂} {r : a₁₀ = a₂₂}
(s : square idp b l r) (H : P ids) : P s :=
let p : l ⬝ b = r := (eq_of_square s)⁻¹ ⬝ !idp_con in
have H2 : P (square_of_eq ((p ⬝ !idp_con⁻¹)⁻¹)),
from eq.rec_on p (by induction b; induction l; exact H),
have H3 : P (square_of_eq ((eq_of_square s)⁻¹⁻¹)),
from eq.rec_on !con_inv_cancel_right H2,
have H4 : P (square_of_eq (eq_of_square s)),
from eq.rec_on !inv_inv H3,
proof
left_inv (to_fun !square_equiv_eq) s ▸ H4
qed
definition rec_on_tb [recursor] {a : A}
{P : Π{b : A} {l : a = b} {r : a = b}, square idp idp l r → Type}
{b : A} {l : a = b} {r : a = b}
(s : square idp idp l r) (H : P ids) : P s :=
have H2 : P (square_of_eq (eq_of_square s)),
from eq.rec_on (eq_of_square s : idp ⬝ r = l) (by induction r; exact H),
left_inv (to_fun !square_equiv_eq) s ▸ H2
definition rec_on_lr [recursor] {a : A}
{P : Π{a' : A} {t : a = a'} {b : a = a'}, square t b idp idp → Type}
{a' : A} {t : a = a'} {b : a = a'}
(s : square t b idp idp) (H : P ids) : P s :=
let p : idp ⬝ b = t := (eq_of_square s)⁻¹ in
have H2 : P (square_of_eq (eq_of_square s)⁻¹⁻¹),
from @eq.rec_on _ _ (λx q, P (square_of_eq q⁻¹)) _ p (by induction b; exact H),
to_left_inv (!square_equiv_eq) s ▸ !inv_inv ▸ H2
--we can also do the other recursors (tl, tr, bl, br, tbl, tbr, tlr, blr), but let's postpone this until they are needed
definition whisker_square [unfold 14 15 16 17] (r₁₀ : p₁₀ = p₁₀') (r₁₂ : p₁₂ = p₁₂')
(r₀₁ : p₀₁ = p₀₁') (r₂₁ : p₂₁ = p₂₁') (s : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
: square p₁₀' p₁₂' p₀₁' p₂₁' :=
by induction r₁₀; induction r₁₂; induction r₀₁; induction r₂₁; exact s
/- squares commute with some operations on 2-paths -/
definition square_inv2 {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : a = a'}
{t : p₁ = p₂} {b : p₃ = p₄} {l : p₁ = p₃} {r : p₂ = p₄} (s : square t b l r)
: square (inverse2 t) (inverse2 b) (inverse2 l) (inverse2 r) :=
by induction s;constructor
definition square_con2 {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : a₁ = a₂} {q₁ q₂ q₃ q₄ : a₂ = a₃}
{t₁ : p₁ = p₂} {b₁ : p₃ = p₄} {l₁ : p₁ = p₃} {r₁ : p₂ = p₄}
{t₂ : q₁ = q₂} {b₂ : q₃ = q₄} {l₂ : q₁ = q₃} {r₂ : q₂ = q₄}
(s₁ : square t₁ b₁ l₁ r₁) (s₂ : square t₂ b₂ l₂ r₂)
: square (t₁ ◾ t₂) (b₁ ◾ b₂) (l₁ ◾ l₂) (r₁ ◾ r₂) :=
by induction s₂;induction s₁;constructor
open is_trunc
definition is_set.elims [H : is_set A] : square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
square_of_eq !is_set.elim
definition is_trunc_square [instance] (n : trunc_index) [H : is_trunc n .+2 A]
: is_trunc n (square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁) :=
is_trunc_equiv_closed_rev n !square_equiv_eq
-- definition square_of_con_inv_hsquare {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : a₁ = a₂}
-- {t : p₁ = p₂} {b : p₃ = p₄} {l : p₁ = p₃} {r : p₂ = p₄}
-- (s : square (con_inv_eq_idp t) (con_inv_eq_idp b) (l ◾ r⁻²) idp)
-- : square t b l r :=
-- sorry --by induction s
/- Square fillers -/
-- TODO replace by "more algebraic" fillers?
variables (p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁)
definition square_fill_t : Σ (p : a₀₀ = a₂₀), square p p₁₂ p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction p₀₁; induction p₂₁; exact ⟨_, !vrefl⟩
definition square_fill_b : Σ (p : a₀₂ = a₂₂), square p₁₀ p p₀₁ p₂₁ :=
by induction p₀₁; induction p₂₁; exact ⟨_, !vrefl⟩
definition square_fill_l : Σ (p : a₀₀ = a₀₂), square p₁₀ p₁₂ p p₂₁ :=
by induction p₁₀; induction p₁₂; exact ⟨_, !hrefl⟩
definition square_fill_r : Σ (p : a₂₀ = a₂₂) , square p₁₀ p₁₂ p₀₁ p :=
by induction p₁₀; induction p₁₂; exact ⟨_, !hrefl⟩
/- Squares having an 'ap' term on one face -/
--TODO find better names
definition square_Flr_ap_idp {c : B} {f : A → B} (p : Π a, f a = c)
{a b : A} (q : a = b) : square (p a) (p b) (ap f q) idp :=
by induction q; apply vrfl
definition square_Flr_idp_ap {c : B} {f : A → B} (p : Π a, c = f a)
{a b : A} (q : a = b) : square (p a) (p b) idp (ap f q) :=
by induction q; apply vrfl
definition square_ap_idp_Flr {b : B} {f : A → B} (p : Π a, f a = b)
{a b : A} (q : a = b) : square (ap f q) idp (p a) (p b) :=
by induction q; apply hrfl
/- Matching eq_hconcat with hconcat etc. -/
-- TODO maybe rename hconcat_eq and the like?
variable (s₁₁)
definition ph_eq_pv_h_vp {p : a₀₀ = a₀₂} (r : p = p₀₁) :
r ⬝ph s₁₁ = !idp_con⁻¹ ⬝pv ((hdeg_square r) ⬝h s₁₁) ⬝vp !idp_con :=
by cases r; cases s₁₁; esimp
definition hdeg_h_eq_pv_ph_vp {p : a₀₀ = a₀₂} (r : p = p₀₁) :
hdeg_square r ⬝h s₁₁ = !idp_con ⬝pv (r ⬝ph s₁₁) ⬝vp !idp_con⁻¹ :=
by cases r; cases s₁₁; esimp
definition hp_eq_h {p : a₂₀ = a₂₂} (r : p₂₁ = p) :
s₁₁ ⬝hp r = s₁₁ ⬝h hdeg_square r :=
by cases r; cases s₁₁; esimp
definition pv_eq_ph_vdeg_v_vh {p : a₀₀ = a₂₀} (r : p = p₁₀) :
r ⬝pv s₁₁ = !idp_con⁻¹ ⬝ph ((vdeg_square r) ⬝v s₁₁) ⬝hp !idp_con :=
by cases r; cases s₁₁; esimp
definition vdeg_v_eq_ph_pv_hp {p : a₀₀ = a₂₀} (r : p = p₁₀) :
vdeg_square r ⬝v s₁₁ = !idp_con ⬝ph (r ⬝pv s₁₁) ⬝hp !idp_con⁻¹ :=
by cases r; cases s₁₁; esimp
definition vp_eq_v {p : a₀₂ = a₂₂} (r : p₁₂ = p) :
s₁₁ ⬝vp r = s₁₁ ⬝v vdeg_square r :=
by cases r; cases s₁₁; esimp
definition natural_square [unfold 8] {f g : A → B} (p : f ~ g) (q : a = a') :
square (p a) (p a') (ap f q) (ap g q) :=
square_of_pathover (apd p q)
definition natural_square_tr [unfold 8] {f g : A → B} (p : f ~ g) (q : a = a') :
square (ap f q) (ap g q) (p a) (p a') :=
transpose (natural_square p q)
definition natural_square011 {A A' : Type} {B : A → Type}
{a a' : A} {p : a = a'} {b : B a} {b' : B a'} (q : b =[p] b')
{l r : Π⦃a⦄, B a → A'} (g : Π⦃a⦄ (b : B a), l b = r b)
: square (apd011 l p q) (apd011 r p q) (g b) (g b') :=
begin
induction q, exact hrfl
end
definition natural_square0111' {A A' : Type} {B : A → Type} (C : Π⦃a⦄, B a → Type)
{a a' : A} {p : a = a'} {b : B a} {b' : B a'} {q : b =[p] b'}
{c : C b} {c' : C b'} (s : c =[apd011 C p q] c')
{l r : Π⦃a⦄ {b : B a}, C b → A'}
(g : Π⦃a⦄ {b : B a} (c : C b), l c = r c)
: square (apd0111 l p q s) (apd0111 r p q s) (g c) (g c') :=
begin
induction q, esimp at s, induction s using idp_rec_on, exact hrfl
end
-- this can be generalized a bit, by making the domain and codomain of k different, and also have
-- a function at the RHS of s (similar to m)
definition natural_square0111 {A A' : Type} {B : A → Type} (C : Π⦃a⦄, B a → Type)
{a a' : A} {p : a = a'} {b : B a} {b' : B a'} {q : b =[p] b'}
{c : C b} {c' : C b'} (r : c =[apd011 C p q] c')
{k : A → A} {l : Π⦃a⦄, B a → B (k a)} (m : Π⦃a⦄ {b : B a}, C b → C (l b))
{f : Π⦃a⦄ {b : B a}, C b → A'}
(s : Π⦃a⦄ {b : B a} (c : C b), f (m c) = f c)
: square (apd0111 (λa b c, f (m c)) p q r) (apd0111 f p q r) (s c) (s c') :=
begin
induction q, esimp at r, induction r using idp_rec_on, exact hrfl
end
end eq
|
e9557b5c7282ecbdab41713dd249058b9ad7ce30 | c777c32c8e484e195053731103c5e52af26a25d1 | /src/topology/category/Top/limits/konig.lean | 0548dc673a9b21b8e8179e44baca4611f8bf94b7 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | kbuzzard/mathlib | 2ff9e85dfe2a46f4b291927f983afec17e946eb8 | 58537299e922f9c77df76cb613910914a479c1f7 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,313,702,744 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 1,683,974,212,000 | 128,185,277 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,522,920,600,000 | 1,522,920,600,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,298 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Scott Morrison, Mario Carneiro, Andrew Yang
-/
import topology.category.Top.limits.basic
/-!
# Topological Kőnig's lemma
A topological version of Kőnig's lemma is that the inverse limit of nonempty compact Hausdorff
spaces is nonempty. (Note: this can be generalized further to inverse limits of nonempty compact
T0 spaces, where all the maps are closed maps; see [Stone1979] --- however there is an erratum
for Theorem 4 that the element in the inverse limit can have cofinally many components that are
not closed points.)
We give this in a more general form, which is that cofiltered limits
of nonempty compact Hausdorff spaces are nonempty
(`nonempty_limit_cone_of_compact_t2_cofiltered_system`).
This also applies to inverse limits, where `{J : Type u} [preorder J] [is_directed J (≤)]` and
`F : Jᵒᵖ ⥤ Top`.
The theorem is specialized to nonempty finite types (which are compact Hausdorff with the
discrete topology) in lemmas `nonempty_sections_of_finite_cofiltered_system` and
`nonempty_sections_of_finite_inverse_system` in the file `category_theory.cofiltered_system`.
(See <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/086J> for the Set version.)
-/
open category_theory
open category_theory.limits
universes u v w
noncomputable theory
namespace Top
section topological_konig
variables {J : Type u} [small_category J]
variables (F : J ⥤ Top.{u})
private abbreviation finite_diagram_arrow {J : Type u} [small_category J] (G : finset J) :=
Σ' (X Y : J) (mX : X ∈ G) (mY : Y ∈ G), X ⟶ Y
private abbreviation finite_diagram (J : Type u) [small_category J] :=
Σ (G : finset J), finset (finite_diagram_arrow G)
/--
Partial sections of a cofiltered limit are sections when restricted to
a finite subset of objects and morphisms of `J`.
-/
def partial_sections {J : Type u} [small_category J] (F : J ⥤ Top.{u})
{G : finset J} (H : finset (finite_diagram_arrow G)) : set (Π j, F.obj j) :=
{ u | ∀ {f : finite_diagram_arrow G} (hf : f ∈ H), F.map f.2.2.2.2 (u f.1) = u f.2.1 }
lemma partial_sections.nonempty [is_cofiltered_or_empty J] [h : Π (j : J), nonempty (F.obj j)]
{G : finset J} (H : finset (finite_diagram_arrow G)) :
(partial_sections F H).nonempty :=
begin
classical,
casesI is_empty_or_nonempty J,
{ exact ⟨is_empty_elim, λ j, is_empty.elim' infer_instance j.1⟩ },
haveI : is_cofiltered J := ⟨⟩,
use λ (j : J), if hj : j ∈ G
then F.map (is_cofiltered.inf_to G H hj) (h (is_cofiltered.inf G H)).some
else (h _).some,
rintros ⟨X, Y, hX, hY, f⟩ hf,
dsimp only,
rwa [dif_pos hX, dif_pos hY, ←comp_app, ←F.map_comp,
@is_cofiltered.inf_to_commutes _ _ _ G H],
end
lemma partial_sections.directed :
directed superset (λ (G : finite_diagram J), partial_sections F G.2) :=
begin
classical,
intros A B,
let ιA : finite_diagram_arrow A.1 → finite_diagram_arrow (A.1 ⊔ B.1) :=
λ f, ⟨f.1, f.2.1, finset.mem_union_left _ f.2.2.1, finset.mem_union_left _ f.2.2.2.1,
f.2.2.2.2⟩,
let ιB : finite_diagram_arrow B.1 → finite_diagram_arrow (A.1 ⊔ B.1) :=
λ f, ⟨f.1, f.2.1, finset.mem_union_right _ f.2.2.1, finset.mem_union_right _ f.2.2.2.1,
f.2.2.2.2⟩,
refine ⟨⟨A.1 ⊔ B.1, A.2.image ιA ⊔ B.2.image ιB⟩, _, _⟩,
{ rintro u hu f hf,
have : ιA f ∈ A.2.image ιA ⊔ B.2.image ιB,
{ apply finset.mem_union_left,
rw finset.mem_image,
refine ⟨f, hf, rfl⟩ },
exact hu this },
{ rintro u hu f hf,
have : ιB f ∈ A.2.image ιA ⊔ B.2.image ιB,
{ apply finset.mem_union_right,
rw finset.mem_image,
refine ⟨f, hf, rfl⟩ },
exact hu this }
end
lemma partial_sections.closed [Π (j : J), t2_space (F.obj j)]
{G : finset J} (H : finset (finite_diagram_arrow G)) :
is_closed (partial_sections F H) :=
begin
have : partial_sections F H =
⋂ {f : finite_diagram_arrow G} (hf : f ∈ H), { u | F.map f.2.2.2.2 (u f.1) = u f.2.1 },
{ ext1,
simp only [set.mem_Inter, set.mem_set_of_eq],
refl, },
rw this,
apply is_closed_bInter,
intros f hf,
apply is_closed_eq,
continuity,
end
/--
Cofiltered limits of nonempty compact Hausdorff spaces are nonempty topological spaces.
-/
lemma nonempty_limit_cone_of_compact_t2_cofiltered_system
[is_cofiltered_or_empty J]
[Π (j : J), nonempty (F.obj j)]
[Π (j : J), compact_space (F.obj j)]
[Π (j : J), t2_space (F.obj j)] :
nonempty (Top.limit_cone.{u} F).X :=
begin
classical,
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := is_compact.nonempty_Inter_of_directed_nonempty_compact_closed
(λ G, partial_sections F _)
(partial_sections.directed F)
(λ G, partial_sections.nonempty F _)
(λ G, is_closed.is_compact (partial_sections.closed F _))
(λ G, partial_sections.closed F _),
use u,
intros X Y f,
let G : finite_diagram J :=
⟨{X, Y},
{⟨X, Y,
by simp only [true_or, eq_self_iff_true, finset.mem_insert],
by simp only [eq_self_iff_true, or_true, finset.mem_insert, finset.mem_singleton],
f⟩}⟩,
exact hu _ ⟨G, rfl⟩ (finset.mem_singleton_self _),
end
end topological_konig
end Top
|
02004847bcedeaf75f2c9aa27e67010e21d3c969 | c213e436cb87414954d055137f2a847a9674d7d2 | /src/analysis/convex.lean | d4b4d698eb66e5e987df3ab4b4016b3cef754ec1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dsanjen/mathlib | 642d270c3d209cfdfb097c2ddc9dd36c102fae9f | a3844c85c606acca5922408217d55891b760fad6 | refs/heads/master | 1,606,199,308,451 | 1,576,274,676,000 | 1,576,274,676,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 30,765 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp
Convex sets and functions on real vector spaces
-/
import analysis.normed_space.basic
import data.complex.basic
import data.set.intervals
import tactic.interactive
import tactic.linarith
import linear_algebra.basic
import ring_theory.algebra
open set
open_locale classical
section vector_space
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {ι : Sort _}
[add_comm_group α] [vector_space ℝ α] [add_comm_group β] [vector_space ℝ β]
(A : set α) (B : set α) (x : α)
local attribute [instance] set.pointwise_add set.smul_set
/-- Convexity of sets -/
def convex (A : set α) :=
∀ (x y : α) (a b : ℝ), x ∈ A → y ∈ A → 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 →
a • x + b • y ∈ A
/-- Alternative definition of set convexity -/
lemma convex_iff:
convex A ↔ ∀ {x y : α} {θ : ℝ},
x ∈ A → y ∈ A → 0 ≤ θ → θ ≤ 1 → θ • x + (1 - θ) • y ∈ A :=
⟨begin
assume h x y θ hx hy hθ₁ hθ₂,
have hθ₂ : 0 ≤ 1 - θ, by linarith,
exact (h _ _ _ _ hx hy hθ₁ hθ₂ (by linarith))
end,
begin
assume h x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
have ha' : a ≤ 1, by linarith,
have hb' : b = 1 - a, by linarith,
rw hb',
exact h hx hy ha ha'
end⟩
/-- Alternative definition of set convexity, in terms of pointwise set operations. -/
lemma convex_iff₂:
convex A ↔ ∀ {a b : ℝ}, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 →
a • A + b • A ⊆ A :=
iff.intro
(λ hA a b ha hb hab w ⟨au, ⟨u, hu, hau⟩, bv, ⟨v, hv, hbv⟩, hw⟩,
by { rw [←hau, ←hbv] at hw; rw hw; exact hA _ _ _ _ hu hv ha hb hab })
(λ h x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
(h ha hb hab) (set.add_mem_pointwise_add ⟨_, hx, rfl⟩ ⟨_, hy, rfl⟩))
/-- Alternative definition of set convexity, in terms of pointwise set operations. -/
lemma convex_iff₃:
convex A ↔ ∀ {θ : ℝ}, 0 ≤ θ → θ ≤ 1 → θ • A + (1 - θ) • A ⊆ A :=
iff.intro
(λ h θ hθ₀ hθ₁, (convex_iff₂ _).mp h hθ₀
(by rwa [le_sub, sub_zero]) (by rw [add_sub, add_sub_cancel']))
(λ h, (convex_iff₂ _).mpr $ λ a b ha hb hab,
have ha' : a ≤ 1, from calc a ≤ a + b : le_add_of_nonneg_right hb
... = 1 : hab,
by { rw (eq_sub_of_add_eq' hab); exact h ha ha' })
/-- Another alternative definition of set convexity -/
lemma convex_iff_div:
convex A ↔ ∀ {x y : α} {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ},
x ∈ A → y ∈ A → 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → 0 < a + b → (a/(a+b)) • x + (b/(a+b)) • y ∈ A :=
⟨begin
assume h x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
apply h _ _ _ _ hx hy,
have ha', from mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ha (le_of_lt (inv_pos hab)),
rwa [mul_zero, ←div_eq_inv_mul] at ha',
have hb', from mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hb (le_of_lt (inv_pos hab)),
rwa [mul_zero, ←div_eq_inv_mul] at hb',
rw [←add_div],
exact div_self (ne_of_lt hab).symm
end,
begin
assume h x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
have h', from h hx hy ha hb,
rw [hab, div_one, div_one] at h',
exact h' zero_lt_one
end⟩
local notation `I` := (Icc 0 1 : set ℝ)
/-- Segments in a vector space -/
def segment (x y : α) := {z : α | ∃ l : ℝ, l ∈ I ∧ z - x = l•(y-x)}
local notation `[`x `, ` y `]` := segment x y
lemma left_mem_segment (x y : α) : x ∈ [x, y] := ⟨0, ⟨⟨le_refl _, zero_le_one⟩, by simp⟩⟩
lemma right_mem_segment (x y : α) : y ∈ [x, y] := ⟨1, ⟨⟨zero_le_one, le_refl _⟩, by simp⟩⟩
lemma mem_segment_iff {x y z : α} : z ∈ [x, y] ↔ ∃ l ∈ I, z = x + l•(y - x) :=
by split; rintro ⟨l, l_in, H⟩; use [l, l_in]; try { rw sub_eq_iff_eq_add at H }; rw H; abel
lemma mem_segment_iff' {x y z : α} : z ∈ [x, y] ↔ ∃ l ∈ I, z = ((1:ℝ)-l)•x + l•y :=
begin
split; rintro ⟨l, l_in, H⟩; use [l, l_in]; try { rw sub_eq_iff_eq_add at H }; rw H;
simp only [smul_sub, sub_smul, one_smul]; abel,
end
lemma segment_symm (x y : α) : [x, y] = [y, x] :=
begin
ext z,
rw [mem_segment_iff', mem_segment_iff'],
split,
all_goals {
rintro ⟨l, ⟨hl₀, hl₁⟩, h⟩,
use (1-l),
split,
split; linarith,
rw [h]; simp },
end
lemma segment_eq_Icc {a b : ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) : [a, b] = Icc a b :=
begin
ext z,
rw mem_segment_iff,
split,
{ rintro ⟨l, ⟨hl₀, hl₁⟩, H⟩,
rw smul_eq_mul at H,
have hba : 0 ≤ b - a, by linarith,
split ; rw H,
{ have := mul_le_mul (le_refl l) hba (le_refl _) hl₀,
simpa using this, },
{ have := mul_le_mul hl₁ (le_refl (b-a)) hba zero_le_one,
rw one_mul at this,
apply le_trans (add_le_add (le_refl a) this),
convert le_refl _,
show b = a + (b-a), by ring } },
{ rintro ⟨hza, hzb⟩,
by_cases hba : b-a = 0,
{ use [(0:ℝ), ⟨le_refl 0, zero_le_one⟩],
rw zero_smul, linarith },
{ have : (z-a)/(b-a) ∈ I,
{ change b -a ≠ 0 at hba,
have : 0 < b - a, from lt_of_le_of_ne (by linarith) hba.symm,
split,
apply div_nonneg ; linarith,
apply (div_le_iff this).2,
simp, convert hzb },
use [(z-a)/(b-a), this],
rw [smul_eq_mul, div_mul_cancel],
ring,
exact hba } }
end
lemma segment_translate (a b c x : α) (hx : x ∈ [b, c]) : a + x ∈ [a + b, a + c] :=
begin
refine exists.elim hx (λθ hθ, ⟨θ, ⟨hθ.1, _⟩⟩),
simp only [smul_sub, smul_add] at *,
simp [smul_add, (add_eq_of_eq_sub hθ.2.symm).symm]
end
lemma segment_translate_image (a b c: α) : (λx, a + x) '' [b, c] = [a + b, a + c] :=
begin
apply subset.antisymm,
{ intros z hz,
apply exists.elim hz,
intros x hx,
convert segment_translate a b c x _,
{ exact hx.2.symm },
{ exact hx.1 } },
{ intros z hz,
apply exists.elim hz,
intros θ hθ,
use z - a,
apply and.intro,
{ convert segment_translate (-a) (a + b) (a + c) z hz; simp },
{ simp only [add_sub_cancel'_right] } }
end
lemma image_Icc_zero_one_eq_segment {x y : α} :
(λ (t : ℝ), x + t • (y - x)) '' Icc 0 1 = segment x y :=
begin
apply subset.antisymm,
{ intros z hz,
apply exists.elim hz,
intros x hx,
use x,
simp [hx.2.symm, hx.1] },
{ intros z hz,
apply exists.elim hz,
intros a ha,
exact ⟨a, ha.1, add_eq_of_eq_sub' (eq.symm ha.2)⟩ }
end
/-- Alternative defintion of set convexity using segments -/
lemma convex_segment_iff : convex A ↔ ∀ x y ∈ A, [x, y] ⊆ A :=
begin
apply iff.intro,
{ intros hA x y hx hy z hseg,
apply exists.elim hseg,
intros l hl,
have hz : z = l • y + (1-l) • x,
{ rw sub_eq_iff_eq_add.1 hl.2,
rw [smul_sub, sub_smul, one_smul],
simp },
rw hz,
apply (convex_iff A).1 hA hy hx hl.1.1 hl.1.2 },
{ intros hA,
rw convex_iff,
intros x y θ hx hy hθ₀ hθ₁,
apply hA y x hy hx,
use θ,
apply and.intro,
{ exact and.intro hθ₀ hθ₁ },
{ simp only [smul_sub, sub_smul, one_smul],
simp } }
end
/- Examples of convex sets -/
lemma convex_empty : convex (∅ : set α) := by finish
lemma convex_singleton (a : α) : convex ({a} : set α) :=
begin
intros x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
rw [set.eq_of_mem_singleton hx, set.eq_of_mem_singleton hy, ←add_smul, hab],
simp
end
lemma convex_univ : convex (set.univ : set α) := by finish
lemma convex_inter (hA: convex A) (hB: convex B) : convex (A ∩ B) :=
λ x y a b (hx : x ∈ A ∩ B) (hy : y ∈ A ∩ B) (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hab : a + b = 1),
⟨hA _ _ _ _ hx.left hy.left ha hb hab, hB _ _ _ _ hx.right hy.right ha hb hab⟩
lemma convex_Inter {s: ι → set α} (h: ∀ i : ι, convex (s i)) : convex (Inter s) :=
begin
intros x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
apply mem_Inter.2,
exact λi, h i _ _ _ _ (mem_Inter.1 hx i) (mem_Inter.1 hy i) ha hb hab
end
lemma convex_prod {A : set α} {B : set β} (hA : convex A) (hB : convex B) :
convex (set.prod A B) :=
begin
intros x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
apply mem_prod.2,
exact ⟨hA _ _ _ _ (mem_prod.1 hx).1 (mem_prod.1 hy).1 ha hb hab,
hB _ _ _ _ (mem_prod.1 hx).2 (mem_prod.1 hy).2 ha hb hab⟩
end
lemma convex_linear_image (f : α → β) (hf : is_linear_map ℝ f) (hA : convex A) : convex (image f A) :=
begin
intros x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
apply exists.elim hx,
intros x' hx',
apply exists.elim hy,
intros y' hy',
use a • x' + b • y',
split,
{ apply hA _ _ _ _ hx'.1 hy'.1 ha hb hab },
{ simp [hx',hy',hf.add,hf.smul] }
end
lemma convex_linear_image' (f : α →ₗ[ℝ] β) (hA : convex A) : convex (image f A) :=
convex_linear_image A f.to_fun (linear_map.is_linear f) hA
lemma convex_linear_preimage (A : set β) (f : α → β) (hf : is_linear_map ℝ f) (hA : convex A) :
convex (preimage f A) :=
begin
intros x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
simp [hf.add, hf.smul],
exact hA (f x) (f y) a b hx hy ha hb hab
end
lemma convex_linear_preimage' (A : set β) (f : α →ₗ[ℝ] β) (hA : convex A) :
convex (preimage f A) :=
convex_linear_preimage A f.to_fun (linear_map.is_linear f) hA
lemma convex_neg : convex A → convex ((λ z, -z) '' A) :=
convex_linear_image _ _ is_linear_map.is_linear_map_neg
lemma convex_neg_preimage : convex A → convex ((λ z, -z) ⁻¹' A) :=
convex_linear_preimage _ _ is_linear_map.is_linear_map_neg
lemma convex_smul (c : ℝ) : convex A → convex ((λ z, c • z) '' A) :=
convex_linear_image _ _ (is_linear_map.is_linear_map_smul c)
lemma convex_smul_preimage (c : ℝ) : convex A → convex ((λ z, c • z) ⁻¹' A) :=
convex_linear_preimage _ _ (is_linear_map.is_linear_map_smul _)
lemma convex_add (hA : convex A) (hB : convex B) :
convex ((λx : α × α, x.1 + x.2) '' (set.prod A B)) :=
begin
apply convex_linear_image (set.prod A B) (λx : α × α, x.1 + x.2) is_linear_map.is_linear_map_add,
exact convex_prod hA hB
end
lemma convex_sub (hA : convex A) (hB : convex B) :
convex ((λx : α × α, x.1 - x.2) '' (set.prod A B)) :=
begin
apply convex_linear_image (set.prod A B) (λx : α × α, x.1 - x.2) is_linear_map.is_linear_map_sub,
exact convex_prod hA hB
end
lemma convex_translation (z : α) (hA : convex A) : convex ((λx, z + x) '' A) :=
begin
have h : convex ((λ (x : α × α), x.fst + x.snd) '' set.prod (insert z ∅) A),
from convex_add {z} A (convex_singleton z) hA,
show convex ((λx, z + x) '' A),
{ rw [@insert_prod _ _ z ∅ A, set.empty_prod, set.union_empty, ←image_comp] at h,
simp at h,
exact h }
end
lemma convex_affinity (z : α) (c : ℝ) (hA : convex A) : convex ((λx, z + c • x) '' A) :=
begin
have h : convex ((λ (x : α), z + x) '' ((λ (z : α), c • z) '' A)),
from convex_translation _ z (convex_smul A c hA),
show convex ((λx, z + c • x) '' A),
{ rw [←image_comp] at h,
simp at h,
exact h }
end
lemma convex_Iio (r : ℝ) : convex (Iio r) :=
begin
intros x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
wlog h : x ≤ y using [x y a b, y x b a],
exact le_total _ _,
calc
a * x + b * y ≤ a * y + b * y : add_le_add_right (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h ha) _
... = y : by rw [←add_mul a b y, hab, one_mul]
... < r : hy
end
lemma convex_Iic (r : ℝ) : convex (Iic r) :=
begin
intros x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
wlog h : x ≤ y using [x y a b, y x b a],
exact le_total _ _,
calc
a * x + b * y ≤ a * y + b * y : add_le_add_right (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h ha) _
... = y : by rw [←add_mul a b y, hab, one_mul]
... ≤ r : hy
end
lemma convex_Ioi (r : ℝ) : convex (Ioi r) :=
begin
rw [← neg_neg r],
rw (image_neg_Iio (-r)).symm,
unfold convex,
intros x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
exact convex_linear_image _ _ is_linear_map.is_linear_map_neg (convex_Iio (-r)) _ _ _ _ hx hy ha hb hab
end
lemma convex_Ici (r : ℝ) : convex (Ici r) :=
begin
rw [← neg_neg r],
rw (image_neg_Iic (-r)).symm,
unfold convex,
intros x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
exact convex_linear_image _ _ is_linear_map.is_linear_map_neg (convex_Iic (-r)) _ _ _ _ hx hy ha hb hab
end
lemma convex_Ioo (r : ℝ) (s : ℝ) : convex (Ioo r s) :=
convex_inter _ _ (convex_Ioi _) (convex_Iio _)
lemma convex_Ico (r : ℝ) (s : ℝ) : convex (Ico r s) :=
convex_inter _ _ (convex_Ici _) (convex_Iio _)
lemma convex_Ioc (r : ℝ) (s : ℝ) : convex (Ioc r s) :=
convex_inter _ _ (convex_Ioi _) (convex_Iic _)
lemma convex_Icc (r : ℝ) (s : ℝ) : convex (Icc r s) :=
convex_inter _ _ (convex_Ici _) (convex_Iic _)
lemma convex_segment (a b : α) : convex [a, b] :=
begin
have : (λ (t : ℝ), a + t • (b - a)) = (λz : α, a + z) ∘ (λt:ℝ, t • (b - a)) := rfl,
rw [← image_Icc_zero_one_eq_segment, this, image_comp],
apply convex_translation _ _ (convex_linear_image _ _ _ (convex_Icc _ _)),
exact is_linear_map.is_linear_map_smul' _
end
lemma convex_halfspace_lt (f : α → ℝ) (h : is_linear_map ℝ f) (r : ℝ) :
convex {w | f w < r} :=
begin
assume x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
simp,
rw [is_linear_map.add ℝ f, is_linear_map.smul f a, is_linear_map.smul f b],
apply convex_Iio _ _ _ _ _ hx hy ha hb hab
end
lemma convex_halfspace_le (f : α → ℝ) (h : is_linear_map ℝ f) (r : ℝ) :
convex {w | f w ≤ r} :=
begin
assume x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
simp,
rw [is_linear_map.add ℝ f, is_linear_map.smul f a, is_linear_map.smul f b],
apply convex_Iic _ _ _ _ _ hx hy ha hb hab
end
lemma convex_halfspace_gt (f : α → ℝ) (h : is_linear_map ℝ f) (r : ℝ) :
convex {w | r < f w} :=
begin
assume x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
simp,
rw [is_linear_map.add ℝ f, is_linear_map.smul f a, is_linear_map.smul f b],
apply convex_Ioi _ _ _ _ _ hx hy ha hb hab
end
lemma convex_halfspace_ge (f : α → ℝ) (h : is_linear_map ℝ f) (r : ℝ) :
convex {w | r ≤ f w} :=
begin
assume x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
simp,
rw [is_linear_map.add ℝ f, is_linear_map.smul f a, is_linear_map.smul f b],
apply convex_Ici _ _ _ _ _ hx hy ha hb hab
end
lemma convex_halfplane (f : α → ℝ) (h : is_linear_map ℝ f) (r : ℝ) :
convex {w | f w = r} :=
begin
assume x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
simp at *,
rw [is_linear_map.add ℝ f, is_linear_map.smul f a, is_linear_map.smul f b],
rw [hx, hy, (add_smul a b r).symm, hab, one_smul]
end
lemma convex_halfspace_re_lt (r : ℝ) : convex {c : ℂ | c.re < r} :=
convex_halfspace_lt _ (is_linear_map.mk complex.add_re complex.smul_re) _
lemma convex_halfspace_re_le (r : ℝ) : convex {c : ℂ | c.re ≤ r} :=
convex_halfspace_le _ (is_linear_map.mk complex.add_re complex.smul_re) _
lemma convex_halfspace_re_gt (r : ℝ) : convex {c : ℂ | r < c.re } :=
convex_halfspace_gt _ (is_linear_map.mk complex.add_re complex.smul_re) _
lemma convex_halfspace_re_lge (r : ℝ) : convex {c : ℂ | r ≤ c.re} :=
convex_halfspace_ge _ (is_linear_map.mk complex.add_re complex.smul_re) _
lemma convex_halfspace_im_lt (r : ℝ) : convex {c : ℂ | c.im < r} :=
convex_halfspace_lt _ (is_linear_map.mk complex.add_im complex.smul_im) _
lemma convex_halfspace_im_le (r : ℝ) : convex {c : ℂ | c.im ≤ r} :=
convex_halfspace_le _ (is_linear_map.mk complex.add_im complex.smul_im) _
lemma convex_halfspace_im_gt (r : ℝ) : convex {c : ℂ | r < c.im } :=
convex_halfspace_gt _ (is_linear_map.mk complex.add_im complex.smul_im) _
lemma convex_halfspace_im_lge (r : ℝ) : convex {c : ℂ | r ≤ c.im} :=
convex_halfspace_ge _ (is_linear_map.mk complex.add_im complex.smul_im) _
section submodule
open submodule
lemma convex_submodule (K : submodule ℝ α) : convex (↑K : set α) :=
by { repeat {intro}, refine add_mem _ (smul_mem _ _ _) (smul_mem _ _ _); assumption }
lemma convex_subspace (K : subspace ℝ α) : convex (↑K : set α) := convex_submodule K
end submodule
lemma convex_sum {γ : Type*} (hA : convex A) (z : γ → α) (s : finset γ) :
∀ a : γ → ℝ, s.sum a = 1 → (∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ a i) → (∀ i ∈ s, z i ∈ A) → s.sum (λi, a i • z i) ∈ A :=
begin
refine finset.induction _ _ s,
{ intros _ h_sum,
simp at h_sum,
exact false.elim h_sum },
{ intros k s hks ih a h_sum ha hz,
by_cases h_cases : s.sum a = 0,
{ have hak : a k = 1,
by rwa [finset.sum_insert hks, h_cases, add_zero] at h_sum,
have ha': ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ a i,
from λ i hi, ha i (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi),
have h_a0: ∀ i ∈ s, a i = 0,
from (finset.sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg ha').1 h_cases,
have h_az0: ∀ i ∈ s, a i • z i = 0,
{ intros i hi,
rw h_a0 i hi,
exact zero_smul _ (z i) },
show finset.sum (insert k s) (λ (i : γ), a i • z i) ∈ A,
{ rw [finset.sum_insert hks, hak, finset.sum_eq_zero h_az0],
simp,
exact hz k (finset.mem_insert_self k s) } },
{ have h_sum_nonneg : 0 ≤ s.sum a,
{ apply finset.sum_nonneg,
intros i hi,
apply ha _ (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi) },
have h_div_in_A: s.sum (λ (i : γ), ((s.sum a)⁻¹ * a i) • z i) ∈ A,
{ apply ih,
{ rw finset.mul_sum.symm,
exact division_ring.inv_mul_cancel h_cases },
{ intros i hi,
exact mul_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 h_sum_nonneg) (ha i (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi))},
{ intros i hi,
exact hz i (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi) } },
have h_sum_in_A: a k • z k
+ finset.sum s a • finset.sum s (λ (i : γ), ((finset.sum s a)⁻¹ * a i) • z i) ∈ A,
{ apply hA,
exact hz k (finset.mem_insert_self k s),
exact h_div_in_A,
exact ha k (finset.mem_insert_self k s),
exact h_sum_nonneg,
rw (finset.sum_insert hks).symm,
exact h_sum },
show finset.sum (insert k s) (λ (i : γ), a i • z i) ∈ A,
{ rw finset.sum_insert hks,
rw finset.smul_sum at h_sum_in_A,
simp [smul_smul, (mul_assoc (s.sum a) _ _).symm] at h_sum_in_A,
conv
begin
congr,
congr,
skip,
congr, skip, funext,
rw (one_mul (a _)).symm,
rw (field.mul_inv_cancel h_cases).symm,
end,
exact h_sum_in_A } } }
end
lemma convex_sum_iff :
convex A ↔
(∀ (s : finset α) (as : α → ℝ),
s.sum as = 1 → (∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ as i) → (∀ x ∈ s, x ∈ A) → s.sum (λx, as x • x) ∈ A ) :=
begin
apply iff.intro,
{ intros hA s as h_sum has hs,
exact convex_sum A hA id s _ h_sum has hs },
{ intros h,
intros x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
by_cases h_cases: x = y,
{ rw [h_cases, ←add_smul, hab, one_smul], exact hy },
{ let s := insert x (finset.singleton y),
have h_sum_eq_add : finset.sum s (λ z, ite (x = z) a b • z) = a • x + b • y,
{ rw [finset.sum_insert (finset.not_mem_singleton.2 h_cases),
finset.sum_singleton],
simp [h_cases] },
rw h_sum_eq_add.symm,
apply h s,
{ rw [finset.sum_insert (finset.not_mem_singleton.2 h_cases),
finset.sum_singleton],
simp [h_cases],
exact hab },
{ intros k hk,
by_cases h_cases : x = k,
{ simp [h_cases], exact ha },
{ simp [h_cases], exact hb } },
{ intros z hz,
apply or.elim (finset.mem_insert.1 hz),
{ intros h_eq, rw h_eq, exact hx },
{ intros h_eq, rw finset.mem_singleton at h_eq, rw h_eq, exact hy } } } }
end
variables (D: set α) (D': set α) (f : α → ℝ) (g : α → ℝ)
/-- Convexity of functions -/
def convex_on (f : α → ℝ) : Prop :=
convex D ∧
∀ (x y : α) (a b : ℝ), x ∈ D → y ∈ D → 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a * f x + b * f y
lemma convex_on_iff :
convex_on D f ↔ convex D ∧ ∀ {x y : α} {θ : ℝ},
x ∈ D → y ∈ D → 0 ≤ θ → θ ≤ 1 → f (θ • x + (1 - θ) • y) ≤ θ * f x + (1 - θ) * f y :=
⟨begin
intro h,
apply and.intro h.1,
intros x y θ hx hy hθ₁ hθ₂,
have hθ₂: 0 ≤ 1 - θ, by linarith,
exact (h.2 _ _ _ _ hx hy hθ₁ hθ₂ (by linarith))
end,
begin
intro h,
apply and.intro h.1,
assume x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
have ha': a ≤ 1, by linarith,
have hb': b = 1 - a, by linarith,
rw hb',
exact (h.2 hx hy ha ha')
end⟩
lemma convex_on_iff_div:
convex_on D f ↔ convex D ∧ ∀ {x y : α} {a : ℝ} {b : ℝ},
x ∈ D → y ∈ D → 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → 0 < a + b →
f ((a/(a+b)) • x + (b/(a+b)) • y) ≤ (a/(a+b)) * f x + (b/(a+b)) * f y :=
⟨begin
intro h,
apply and.intro h.1,
intros x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
apply h.2 _ _ _ _ hx hy,
have ha', from mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ha (le_of_lt (inv_pos hab)),
rwa [mul_zero, ←div_eq_inv_mul] at ha',
have hb', from mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hb (le_of_lt (inv_pos hab)),
rwa [mul_zero, ←div_eq_inv_mul] at hb',
rw [←add_div],
exact div_self (ne_of_lt hab).symm
end,
begin
intro h,
apply and.intro h.1,
intros x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
have h', from h.2 hx hy ha hb,
rw [hab, div_one, div_one] at h',
exact h' zero_lt_one
end⟩
lemma convex_on_sum {γ : Type} (s : finset γ) (z : γ → α) :
∀ (a : γ → ℝ), convex_on D f → (∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ a i) → (∀ i ∈ s, z i ∈ D) → s.sum a = 1 →
f (s.sum (λi, a i • z i)) ≤ s.sum (λi, a i • f (z i)) :=
begin
refine finset.induction (by simp) _ s,
intros k s hks ih a hf ha hz h_sum,
by_cases h_cases : s.sum a = 0,
{ have hak : a k = 1,
by rwa [finset.sum_insert hks, h_cases, add_zero] at h_sum,
have ha': ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ a i,
from λ i hi, ha i (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi),
have h_a0: ∀ i ∈ s, a i = 0,
from (finset.sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg ha').1 h_cases,
have h_az0: ∀ i ∈ s, a i • z i = 0,
{ intros i hi,
rw h_a0 i hi,
exact zero_smul _ _ },
have h_afz0: ∀ i ∈ s, a i • f (z i) = 0,
{ intros i hi,
rw h_a0 i hi,
exact zero_smul _ _ },
show f (finset.sum (insert k s) (λi, a i • z i)) ≤ finset.sum (insert k s) (λi, a i • f (z i)),
{ rw [finset.sum_insert hks, hak, finset.sum_eq_zero h_az0],
rw [finset.sum_insert hks, hak, finset.sum_eq_zero h_afz0],
simp } },
{ have h_sum_nonneg : 0 ≤ s.sum a ,
{ apply finset.sum_nonneg,
intros i hi,
apply ha _ (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi) },
have ih_div: f (s.sum (λ (i : γ), ((s.sum a)⁻¹ * a i) • z i))
≤ s.sum (λ (i : γ), ((s.sum a)⁻¹ * a i) • f (z i)),
{ apply ih _ hf,
{ intros i hi,
exact mul_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 h_sum_nonneg) (ha i (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi))},
{ intros i hi,
exact hz i (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi) },
{ rw finset.mul_sum.symm,
exact division_ring.inv_mul_cancel h_cases } },
have h_div_in_D: s.sum (λ (i : γ), ((s.sum a)⁻¹ * a i) • z i) ∈ D,
{ apply convex_sum _ hf.1,
{ rw finset.mul_sum.symm,
exact division_ring.inv_mul_cancel h_cases },
{ intros i hi,
exact mul_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 h_sum_nonneg) (ha i (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi))},
{ intros i hi,
exact hz i (finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi) } },
have hf': f (a k • z k + s.sum a • s.sum (λ (i : γ), ((finset.sum s a)⁻¹ * a i) • z i))
≤ a k • f (z k) + s.sum a • f (s.sum (λ (i : γ), ((finset.sum s a)⁻¹ * a i) • z i)),
{ apply hf.2,
exact hz k (finset.mem_insert_self k s),
exact h_div_in_D,
exact ha k (finset.mem_insert_self k s),
exact h_sum_nonneg,
rw (finset.sum_insert hks).symm,
exact h_sum },
have ih_div': f (a k • z k + s.sum a • s.sum (λ (i : γ), ((finset.sum s a)⁻¹ * a i) • z i))
≤ a k • f (z k) + s.sum a • s.sum (λ (i : γ), ((finset.sum s a)⁻¹ * a i) • f (z i)),
from trans hf' (add_le_add_left (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ih_div h_sum_nonneg) _),
show f (finset.sum (insert k s) (λ (i : γ), a i • z i))
≤ finset.sum (insert k s) (λ (i : γ), a i • f (z i)),
{ simp [finset.sum_insert hks],
simp [finset.smul_sum] at ih_div',
simp [smul_smul, (mul_assoc (s.sum a) _ _).symm] at ih_div',
convert ih_div',
repeat { apply funext,
intro i,
rw [field.mul_inv_cancel, one_mul],
exact h_cases } } }
end
lemma convex_on_linorder [hα : linear_order α] (f : α → ℝ) : convex_on D f ↔
convex D ∧ ∀ (x y : α) (a b : ℝ), x ∈ D → y ∈ D → x < y → a ≥ 0 → b ≥ 0 → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a * f x + b * f y :=
begin
apply iff.intro,
{ intro h,
apply and.intro h.1,
intros x y a b hx hy hxy ha hb hab,
exact h.2 x y a b hx hy ha hb hab },
{ intro h,
apply and.intro h.1,
intros x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
wlog hxy : x<=y using [x y a b, y x b a],
exact le_total _ _,
apply or.elim (lt_or_eq_of_le hxy),
{ intros hxy, exact h.2 x y a b hx hy hxy ha hb hab },
{ intros hxy, rw [hxy,←add_smul, hab, one_smul,←add_mul,hab,one_mul] } }
end
lemma convex_on_subset (h_convex_on : convex_on D f) (h_subset : A ⊆ D) (h_convex : convex A) :
convex_on A f :=
begin
apply and.intro h_convex,
intros x y a b hx hy,
exact h_convex_on.2 x y a b (h_subset hx) (h_subset hy),
end
lemma convex_on_add (hf : convex_on D f) (hg : convex_on D g) : convex_on D (λx, f x + g x) :=
begin
apply and.intro hf.1,
intros x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
calc
f (a • x + b • y) + g (a • x + b • y) ≤ (a * f x + b * f y) + (a * g x + b * g y)
: add_le_add (hf.2 x y a b hx hy ha hb hab) (hg.2 x y a b hx hy ha hb hab)
... = a * f x + a * g x + b * f y + b * g y : by linarith
... = a * (f x + g x) + b * (f y + g y) : by simp [mul_add]
end
lemma convex_on_smul (c : ℝ) (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hf : convex_on D f) : convex_on D (λx, c * f x) :=
begin
apply and.intro hf.1,
intros x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
calc
c * f (a • x + b • y) ≤ c * (a * f x + b * f y)
: mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hf.2 x y a b hx hy ha hb hab) hc
... = a * (c * f x) + b * (c * f y) : by rw mul_add; ac_refl
end
lemma convex_le_of_convex_on (hf : convex_on D f) (r : ℝ) : convex {x ∈ D | f x ≤ r} :=
begin
intros x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
simp at *,
apply and.intro,
{ exact hf.1 x y a b hx.1 hy.1 ha hb hab },
{ apply le_trans (hf.2 x y a b hx.1 hy.1 ha hb hab),
wlog h_wlog : f x ≤ f y using [x y a b, y x b a],
apply le_total,
calc
a * f x + b * f y ≤ a * f y + b * f y :
add_le_add (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h_wlog ha) (le_refl _)
... = (a + b) * f y : (add_mul _ _ _).symm
... ≤ r : by rw [hab, one_mul]; exact hy.2 }
end
lemma convex_lt_of_convex_on (hf : convex_on D f) (r : ℝ) : convex {x ∈ D | f x < r} :=
begin
intros x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
simp at *,
apply and.intro,
{ exact hf.1 x y a b hx.1 hy.1 ha hb hab },
{ apply lt_of_le_of_lt (hf.2 x y a b hx.1 hy.1 ha hb hab),
wlog h_wlog : f x ≤ f y using [x y a b, y x b a],
apply le_total,
calc
a * f x + b * f y ≤ a * f y + b * f y :
add_le_add (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h_wlog ha) (le_refl _)
... = (a + b) * f y : (add_mul _ _ _).symm
... < r : by rw [hab, one_mul]; exact hy.2 }
end
lemma le_on_interval_of_convex_on (x y : α) (a b : ℝ)
(hf : convex_on D f) (hx : x ∈ D) (hy : y ∈ D) (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hab : a + b = 1) :
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ max (f x) (f y) :=
calc
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a * f x + b * f y : hf.2 x y a b hx hy ha hb hab
... ≤ a * max (f x) (f y) + b * max (f x) (f y) :
add_le_add (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_max_left _ _) ha) (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_max_right _ _) hb)
... ≤ max (f x) (f y) : by rw [←add_mul, hab, one_mul]
end vector_space
section topological_vector_space
variables {α : Type*} [add_comm_group α] [vector_space ℝ α]
[topological_space α] [topological_add_group α] [topological_vector_space ℝ α]
local attribute [instance] set.pointwise_add set.smul_set
open set
/-- In a topological vector space, the interior of a convex set is convex. -/
lemma convex_interior {A : set α} (hA : convex A) : convex (interior A) :=
(convex_iff₂ _).mpr $ λ a b ha hb hab,
have h : is_open (a • interior A + b • interior A), from
or.elim (classical.em (a = 0))
(λ heq,
have hne : b ≠ 0, from by { rw [heq, zero_add] at hab, rw hab, exact one_ne_zero },
is_open_pointwise_add_left ((is_open_map_smul_of_ne_zero hne _) is_open_interior))
(λ hne,
is_open_pointwise_add_right ((is_open_map_smul_of_ne_zero hne _) is_open_interior)),
(subset_interior_iff_subset_of_open h).mpr $ subset.trans
(by { apply pointwise_add_subset_add; exact image_subset _ interior_subset })
((convex_iff₂ _).mp hA ha hb hab)
/-- In a topological vector space, the closure of a convex set is convex. -/
lemma convex_closure {A : set α} (hA : convex A) : convex (closure A) :=
λ x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
let f : α → α → α := λ x' y', a • x' + b • y' in
have hf : continuous ((λ p : α × α, p.fst + p.snd) ∘ (λ p : α × α, (a • p.fst, b • p.snd))), from
continuous.comp continuous_add (continuous.prod_mk
(continuous_smul continuous_const continuous_fst)
(continuous_smul continuous_const continuous_snd)),
show f x y ∈ closure A, from
mem_closure_of_continuous2 hf hx hy (λ x' hx' y' hy', subset_closure
(hA _ _ _ _ hx' hy' ha hb hab))
end topological_vector_space
section normed_space
variables {α : Type*} [normed_group α] [normed_space ℝ α]
lemma convex_on_dist (z : α) (D : set α) (hD : convex D) :
convex_on D (λz', dist z' z) :=
begin
apply and.intro hD,
intros x y a b hx hy ha hb hab,
calc
dist (a • x + b • y) z = ∥ (a • x + b • y) - (a + b) • z ∥ :
by rw [hab, one_smul, normed_group.dist_eq]
... = ∥a • (x - z) + b • (y - z)∥ :
by rw [add_smul, smul_sub, smul_sub]; simp
... ≤ ∥a • (x - z)∥ + ∥b • (y - z)∥ :
norm_add_le (a • (x - z)) (b • (y - z))
... = a * dist x z + b * dist y z :
by simp [norm_smul, normed_group.dist_eq, real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg ha, abs_of_nonneg hb]
end
lemma convex_ball (a : α) (r : ℝ) : convex (metric.ball a r) :=
by simpa using convex_lt_of_convex_on univ (λb, dist b a) (convex_on_dist _ _ convex_univ) r
lemma convex_closed_ball (a : α) (r : ℝ) : convex (metric.closed_ball a r) :=
by simpa using convex_le_of_convex_on univ (λb, dist b a) (convex_on_dist _ _ convex_univ) r
end normed_space
|
225c2ce2253492c85f88a2a3274c5a9eab6e9d6c | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/etaStruct.lean | ebee4062c87114a1749f4d69bbffb51de1fbf317 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,973 | lean | example (x : α × β) : x = (x.1, x.2) :=
rfl -- Should work with eta for structures
example (x : Unit) : x = ⟨⟩ :=
rfl -- Should work with eta for structures
structure Equiv (α : Sort u) (β : Sort v) where
toFun : α → β
invFun : β → α
left_inv : ∀ x, invFun (toFun x) = x
right_inv : ∀ x, toFun (invFun x) = x
infix:50 "≃" => Equiv
def Equiv.symm (e : α ≃ β) : β ≃ α :=
{ toFun := e.invFun
invFun := e.toFun
left_inv := e.right_inv
right_inv := e.left_inv }
theorem Equiv.symm.symm (e : α ≃ β) : e.symm.symm = e :=
rfl -- Should work with eta for structures
structure Bla where
x : Nat
def Bla.toNat (b : Bla) : Nat := b.x
def Nat.toBla (x : Nat) : Bla := { x }
example (b : Bla) : b.toNat.toBla = b :=
rfl -- Should work with eta for structures
example (b : Bla) : b.toNat.toBla = b := by
cases b
rfl
example (x : Unit × α) : x = ((), x.2) := rfl
example (x : (_ : True ∨ False) ×' α) : x = ⟨Or.inl ⟨⟩, x.2⟩ := rfl
example (p : α × α → Prop) (h : ∀ x y, p (x, y)) : p z := h z.1 _
class TopologicalSpace (α : Type)
structure Homeomorph (α β : Type) [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] extends Equiv α β where
continuousToFun : True
continuousInv : True
def Homeomorph.symm [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] (f : Homeomorph α β) : Homeomorph β α where
toFun := f.invFun
invFun := f.toFun
left_inv := sorry
right_inv := sorry
continuousToFun := f.continuousInv
continuousInv := sorry
example [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] (f : Homeomorph α β) :
f.symm.symm = f := rfl -- fails
def frob : Nat × Nat → Nat × Nat
| (x, y) => (x + y, 42)
example (x : Nat × Nat) : (frob x).2 = 42 := rfl
example (x y : Unit) : x = y := rfl
opaque f : Nat → Unit
opaque g : Nat → Unit
example (x y : Nat) : f x = f y := rfl
example (x y : Nat) : f x = g y := rfl
|
2dd0afb6a0e3f140cabba80fff6e5ad7f2f7d12f | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /src/Lean/Meta/Tactic/Unfold.lean | 7d99d0861ae1527ad5b90619b8936d636e439cb5 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,969 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Meta.Eqns
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Delta
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Simp.Main
namespace Lean.Meta
private def getSimpUnfoldContext : MetaM Simp.Context :=
return {
congrTheorems := (← getSimpCongrTheorems)
config := Simp.neutralConfig
}
def unfold (e : Expr) (declName : Name) : MetaM Simp.Result := do
if let some unfoldThm ← getUnfoldEqnFor? declName then
(·.1) <$> Simp.main e (← getSimpUnfoldContext) (methods := { pre := pre unfoldThm })
else
return { expr := (← deltaExpand e (· == declName)) }
where
pre (unfoldThm : Name) (e : Expr) : SimpM Simp.Step := do
match (← withReducible <| Simp.tryTheorem? e { origin := .decl unfoldThm, proof := mkConst unfoldThm, rfl := (← isRflTheorem unfoldThm) } (fun _ => return none)) with
| none => pure ()
| some r => match (← reduceMatcher? r.expr) with
| .reduced e' => return Simp.Step.done { r with expr := e' }
| _ => return Simp.Step.done r
return Simp.Step.visit { expr := e }
def unfoldTarget (mvarId : MVarId) (declName : Name) : MetaM MVarId := mvarId.withContext do
let target ← instantiateMVars (← mvarId.getType)
let r ← unfold target declName
if r.expr == target then throwError "tactic 'unfold' failed to unfold '{declName}' at{indentExpr target}"
applySimpResultToTarget mvarId target r
def unfoldLocalDecl (mvarId : MVarId) (fvarId : FVarId) (declName : Name) : MetaM MVarId := mvarId.withContext do
let type ← fvarId.getType
let r ← unfold (← instantiateMVars type) declName
if r.expr == type then throwError "tactic 'unfold' failed to unfold '{declName}' at{indentExpr type}"
let some (_, mvarId) ← applySimpResultToLocalDecl mvarId fvarId r (mayCloseGoal := false) | unreachable!
return mvarId
end Lean.Meta
|
45ba731f6fb2368d6c70e46b3520c60793152ba1 | 57aec6ee746bc7e3a3dd5e767e53bd95beb82f6d | /tests/lean/bigUnivOffsets.lean | 5b1b186b78f055d03bdc9013e632e474a4276803 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | collares/lean4 | 861a9269c4592bce49b71059e232ff0bfe4594cc | 52a4f535d853a2c7c7eea5fee8a4fa04c682c1ee | refs/heads/master | 1,691,419,031,324 | 1,618,678,138,000 | 1,618,678,138,000 | 358,989,750 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,618,696,333,000 | 1,618,696,333,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 63 | lean | #check Type 100000000
universes u
#check Type (u + 10000000)
|
01ca1e57d69bcd86805ad69ae46dc84af035315e | 618003631150032a5676f229d13a079ac875ff77 | /src/topology/algebra/open_subgroup.lean | ac6474ec645b865717b038316b4576c7c0eeabec | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | awainverse/mathlib | 939b68c8486df66cfda64d327ad3d9165248c777 | ea76bd8f3ca0a8bf0a166a06a475b10663dec44a | refs/heads/master | 1,659,592,962,036 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 1,590,987,592,000 | 268,436,019 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,590,990,500,000 | 1,590,990,500,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,039 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import order.filter.lift
import topology.opens
import topology.algebra.ring
section
open topological_space
variables (G : Type*) [group G] [topological_space G]
/-- The type of open subgroups of a topological group. -/
@[to_additive open_add_subgroup]
def open_subgroup := { U : set G // is_open U ∧ is_subgroup U }
@[to_additive]
instance open_subgroup.has_coe :
has_coe (open_subgroup G) (opens G) := ⟨λ U, ⟨U.1, U.2.1⟩⟩
end
-- Tell Lean that `open_add_subgroup` is a namespace
namespace open_add_subgroup
end open_add_subgroup
namespace open_subgroup
open function topological_space
open_locale topological_space
variables {G : Type*} [group G] [topological_space G]
variables {U V : open_subgroup G}
@[to_additive]
instance : has_mem G (open_subgroup G) := ⟨λ g U, g ∈ (U : set G)⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma ext : (U = V) ↔ ((U : set G) = V) :=
by cases U; cases V; split; intro h; try {congr}; assumption
@[ext, to_additive]
lemma ext' (h : (U : set G) = V) : (U = V) :=
ext.mpr h
@[to_additive]
lemma coe_injective : injective (λ U : open_subgroup G, (U : set G)) :=
λ U V h, ext' h
@[to_additive is_add_subgroup]
instance : is_subgroup (U : set G) := U.2.2
variable (U)
@[to_additive]
protected lemma is_open : is_open (U : set G) := U.2.1
@[to_additive]
protected lemma one_mem : (1 : G) ∈ U :=
@is_submonoid.one_mem _ _ (U : set G) _
@[to_additive]
protected lemma inv_mem {g : G} (h : g ∈ U) : g⁻¹ ∈ U :=
@is_subgroup.inv_mem G _ U _ g h
@[to_additive]
protected lemma mul_mem {g₁ g₂ : G} (h₁ : g₁ ∈ U) (h₂ : g₂ ∈ U) : g₁ * g₂ ∈ U :=
@is_submonoid.mul_mem G _ U _ g₁ g₂ h₁ h₂
@[to_additive]
lemma mem_nhds_one : (U : set G) ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G) :=
mem_nhds_sets U.is_open U.one_mem
variable {U}
@[to_additive]
instance : inhabited (open_subgroup G) :=
{ default := ⟨set.univ, ⟨is_open_univ, by apply_instance⟩⟩ }
@[to_additive]
lemma is_open_of_nonempty_open_subset [topological_monoid G] {s : set G} [is_subgroup s]
(h : ∃ U : opens G, nonempty U ∧ (U : set G) ⊆ s) :
is_open s :=
begin
rw is_open_iff_forall_mem_open,
intros x hx,
rcases h with ⟨U, ⟨g, hg⟩, hU⟩,
use (λ y, y * (x⁻¹ * g)) ⁻¹' U,
split,
{ intros u hu,
erw set.mem_preimage at hu,
replace hu := hU hu,
replace hg := hU hg,
have : (x⁻¹ * g)⁻¹ ∈ s,
{ simp [*, is_subgroup.inv_mem, is_submonoid.mul_mem], },
convert is_submonoid.mul_mem hu this, simp [mul_assoc] },
split,
{ exact continuous_id.mul continuous_const _ U.property },
{ change x * (x⁻¹ * g) ∈ U,
convert hg,
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_right_inv, one_mul] }
end
@[to_additive is_open_of_open_add_subgroup]
lemma is_open_of_open_subgroup [topological_monoid G] {s : set G} [is_subgroup s]
(h : ∃ U : open_subgroup G, (U : set G) ⊆ s) : is_open s :=
is_open_of_nonempty_open_subset $ let ⟨U, hU⟩ := h in ⟨U, ⟨⟨1, U.one_mem⟩⟩, hU⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma is_closed [topological_monoid G] (U : open_subgroup G) : is_closed (U : set G) :=
begin
show is_open (-(U : set G)),
rw is_open_iff_forall_mem_open,
intros x hx,
use (λ y, y * x⁻¹) ⁻¹' U,
split,
{ intros u hux,
erw set.mem_preimage at hux,
rw set.mem_compl_iff at hx ⊢,
intro hu, apply hx,
convert is_submonoid.mul_mem (is_subgroup.inv_mem hux) hu,
simp },
split,
{ exact (continuous_mul_right _) _ U.is_open },
{ simpa using @is_submonoid.one_mem _ _ (U : set G) _ }
end
section
variables {H : Type*} [group H] [topological_space H]
@[to_additive]
def prod (U : open_subgroup G) (V : open_subgroup H) : open_subgroup (G × H) :=
⟨(U : set G).prod (V : set H), is_open_prod U.is_open V.is_open, by apply_instance⟩
end
@[to_additive]
instance : partial_order (open_subgroup G) := partial_order.lift _ coe_injective (by apply_instance)
@[to_additive]
instance : semilattice_inf_top (open_subgroup G) :=
{ inf := λ U V, ⟨(U : set G) ∩ V, is_open_inter U.is_open V.is_open, by apply_instance⟩,
inf_le_left := λ U V, set.inter_subset_left _ _,
inf_le_right := λ U V, set.inter_subset_right _ _,
le_inf := λ U V W hV hW, set.subset_inter hV hW,
top := default _,
le_top := λ U, set.subset_univ _,
..open_subgroup.partial_order }
@[to_additive]
instance [topological_monoid G] : semilattice_sup_top (open_subgroup G) :=
{ sup := λ U V,
{ val := group.closure ((U : set G) ∪ V),
property :=
begin
haveI subgrp := _, refine ⟨_, subgrp⟩,
{ refine is_open_of_open_subgroup _,
exact ⟨U, set.subset.trans (set.subset_union_left _ _) group.subset_closure⟩ },
{ apply_instance }
end },
le_sup_left := λ U V, set.subset.trans (set.subset_union_left _ _) group.subset_closure,
le_sup_right := λ U V, set.subset.trans (set.subset_union_right _ _) group.subset_closure,
sup_le := λ U V W hU hV, group.closure_subset $ set.union_subset hU hV,
..open_subgroup.semilattice_inf_top }
@[simp, to_additive] lemma coe_inf : (↑(U ⊓ V) : set G) = (U : set G) ∩ V := rfl
@[to_additive] lemma le_iff : U ≤ V ↔ (U : set G) ⊆ V := iff.rfl
end open_subgroup
namespace submodule
open open_add_subgroup
variables {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [comm_ring R]
variables [add_comm_group M] [topological_space M] [topological_add_group M] [module R M]
lemma is_open_of_open_submodule {P : submodule R M}
(h : ∃ U : submodule R M, is_open (U : set M) ∧ U ≤ P) : is_open (P : set M) :=
let ⟨U, h₁, h₂⟩ := h in is_open_of_open_add_subgroup ⟨⟨U, h₁, by apply_instance⟩, h₂⟩
end submodule
namespace ideal
variables {R : Type*} [comm_ring R]
variables [topological_space R] [topological_ring R]
lemma is_open_of_open_subideal {I : ideal R}
(h : ∃ U : ideal R, is_open (U : set R) ∧ U ≤ I) : is_open (I : set R) :=
submodule.is_open_of_open_submodule h
end ideal
|
fe166e5e78d091d20053da9e5ca3120560cf7f5b | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/measure_theory/integral/vitali_caratheodory.lean | aca51ddb1aa9507fdb0882c0a0e2497da830b31e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 29,811 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import measure_theory.measure.regular
import topology.semicontinuous
import measure_theory.integral.bochner
import topology.instances.ereal
/-!
# Vitali-Carathéodory theorem
Vitali-Carathéodory theorem asserts the following. Consider an integrable function `f : α → ℝ` on
a space with a regular measure. Then there exists a function `g : α → ereal` such that `f x < g x`
everywhere, `g` is lower semicontinuous, and the integral of `g` is arbitrarily close to that of
`f`. This theorem is proved in this file, as `exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_lt`.
Symmetrically, there exists `g < f` which is upper semicontinuous, with integral arbitrarily close
to that of `f`. It follows from the previous statement applied to `-f`. It is formalized under
the name `exists_upper_semicontinuous_lt_integral_gt`.
The most classical version of Vitali-Carathéodory theorem only ensures a large inequality
`f x ≤ g x`. For applications to the fundamental theorem of calculus, though, the strict inequality
`f x < g x` is important. Therefore, we prove the stronger version with strict inequalities in this
file. There is a price to pay: we require that the measure is `σ`-finite, which is not necessary for
the classical Vitali-Carathéodory theorem. Since this is satisfied in all applications, this is
not a real problem.
## Sketch of proof
Decomposing `f` as the difference of its positive and negative parts, it suffices to show that a
positive function can be bounded from above by a lower semicontinuous function, and from below
by an upper semicontinuous function, with integrals close to that of `f`.
For the bound from above, write `f` as a series `∑' n, cₙ * indicator (sₙ)` of simple functions.
Then, approximate `sₙ` by a larger open set `uₙ` with measure very close to that of `sₙ` (this is
possible by regularity of the measure), and set `g = ∑' n, cₙ * indicator (uₙ)`. It is
lower semicontinuous as a series of lower semicontinuous functions, and its integral is arbitrarily
close to that of `f`.
For the bound from below, use finitely many terms in the series, and approximate `sₙ` from inside by
a closed set `Fₙ`. Then `∑ n < N, cₙ * indicator (Fₙ)` is bounded from above by `f`, it is
upper semicontinuous as a finite sum of upper semicontinuous functions, and its integral is
arbitrarily close to that of `f`.
The main pain point in the implementation is that one needs to jump between the spaces `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0`,
`ℝ≥0∞` and `ereal` (and be careful that addition is not well behaved on `ereal`), and between
`lintegral` and `integral`.
We first show the bound from above for simple functions and the nonnegative integral
(this is the main nontrivial mathematical point), then deduce it for general nonnegative functions,
first for the nonnegative integral and then for the Bochner integral.
Then we follow the same steps for the lower bound.
Finally, we glue them together to obtain the main statement
`exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_lt`.
## Related results
Are you looking for a result on approximation by continuous functions (not just semicontinuous)?
See result `measure_theory.Lp.continuous_map_dense`, in the file
`measure_theory.continuous_map_dense`.
## References
[Rudin, *Real and Complex Analysis* (Theorem 2.24)][rudin2006real]
-/
open_locale ennreal nnreal
open measure_theory measure_theory.measure
variables {α : Type*} [topological_space α] [measurable_space α] [borel_space α] (μ : measure α)
[weakly_regular μ]
namespace measure_theory
local infixr ` →ₛ `:25 := simple_func
/-! ### Lower semicontinuous upper bound for nonnegative functions -/
/-- Given a simple function `f` with values in `ℝ≥0`, there exists a lower semicontinuous
function `g ≥ f` with integral arbitrarily close to that of `f`. Formulation in terms of
`lintegral`.
Auxiliary lemma for Vitali-Carathéodory theorem `exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_lt`. -/
lemma simple_func.exists_le_lower_semicontinuous_lintegral_ge (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε0 : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0, (∀ x, f x ≤ g x) ∧ lower_semicontinuous g ∧
(∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + ε) :=
begin
induction f using measure_theory.simple_func.induction with c s hs f₁ f₂ H h₁ h₂ generalizing ε,
{ let f := simple_func.piecewise s hs (simple_func.const α c) (simple_func.const α 0),
by_cases h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ⊤,
{ refine ⟨λ x, c, λ x, _, lower_semicontinuous_const,
by simp only [ennreal.top_add, le_top, h]⟩,
simp only [simple_func.coe_const, simple_func.const_zero, simple_func.coe_zero,
set.piecewise_eq_indicator, simple_func.coe_piecewise],
exact set.indicator_le_self _ _ _ },
by_cases hc : c = 0,
{ refine ⟨λ x, 0, _, lower_semicontinuous_const, _⟩,
{ simp only [hc, set.indicator_zero', pi.zero_apply, simple_func.const_zero, implies_true_iff,
eq_self_iff_true, simple_func.coe_zero, set.piecewise_eq_indicator,
simple_func.coe_piecewise, le_zero_iff] },
{ simp only [lintegral_const, zero_mul, zero_le, ennreal.coe_zero] } },
have : μ s < μ s + ε / c,
{ have : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < ε / c := ennreal.div_pos_iff.2 ⟨ε0, ennreal.coe_ne_top⟩,
simpa using ennreal.add_lt_add_left _ this,
simpa only [hs, hc, lt_top_iff_ne_top, true_and, simple_func.coe_const, function.const_apply,
lintegral_const, ennreal.coe_indicator, set.univ_inter, ennreal.coe_ne_top,
measurable_set.univ, with_top.mul_eq_top_iff, simple_func.const_zero, or_false,
lintegral_indicator, ennreal.coe_eq_zero, ne.def, not_false_iff, simple_func.coe_zero,
set.piecewise_eq_indicator, simple_func.coe_piecewise, false_and, restrict_apply] using h },
obtain ⟨u, su, u_open, μu⟩ : ∃ u ⊇ s, is_open u ∧ μ u < μ s + ε / c :=
s.exists_is_open_lt_of_lt _ this,
refine ⟨set.indicator u (λ x, c), λ x, _, u_open.lower_semicontinuous_indicator (zero_le _), _⟩,
{ simp only [simple_func.coe_const, simple_func.const_zero, simple_func.coe_zero,
set.piecewise_eq_indicator, simple_func.coe_piecewise],
exact set.indicator_le_indicator_of_subset su (λ x, zero_le _) _ },
{ suffices : (c : ℝ≥0∞) * μ u ≤ c * μ s + ε, by
simpa only [hs, u_open.measurable_set, simple_func.coe_const, function.const_apply,
lintegral_const, ennreal.coe_indicator, set.univ_inter, measurable_set.univ,
simple_func.const_zero, lintegral_indicator, simple_func.coe_zero,
set.piecewise_eq_indicator, simple_func.coe_piecewise, restrict_apply],
calc (c : ℝ≥0∞) * μ u ≤ c * (μ s + ε / c) : ennreal.mul_le_mul le_rfl μu.le
... = c * μ s + ε :
begin
simp_rw [mul_add],
rw ennreal.mul_div_cancel' _ ennreal.coe_ne_top,
simpa using hc,
end } },
{ rcases h₁ (ennreal.half_pos ε0).ne' with ⟨g₁, f₁_le_g₁, g₁cont, g₁int⟩,
rcases h₂ (ennreal.half_pos ε0).ne' with ⟨g₂, f₂_le_g₂, g₂cont, g₂int⟩,
refine ⟨λ x, g₁ x + g₂ x, λ x, add_le_add (f₁_le_g₁ x) (f₂_le_g₂ x), g₁cont.add g₂cont, _⟩,
simp only [simple_func.coe_add, ennreal.coe_add, pi.add_apply],
rw [lintegral_add f₁.measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal f₂.measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal,
lintegral_add g₁cont.measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal g₂cont.measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal],
convert add_le_add g₁int g₂int using 1,
conv_lhs { rw ← ennreal.add_halves ε },
abel }
end
open simple_func (eapprox_diff tsum_eapprox_diff)
/-- Given a measurable function `f` with values in `ℝ≥0`, there exists a lower semicontinuous
function `g ≥ f` with integral arbitrarily close to that of `f`. Formulation in terms of
`lintegral`.
Auxiliary lemma for Vitali-Carathéodory theorem `exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_lt`. -/
lemma exists_le_lower_semicontinuous_lintegral_ge
(f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : measurable f) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (εpos : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, (∀ x, f x ≤ g x) ∧ lower_semicontinuous g ∧ (∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + ε) :=
begin
rcases ennreal.exists_pos_sum_of_encodable' εpos ℕ with ⟨δ, δpos, hδ⟩,
have : ∀ n, ∃ g : α → ℝ≥0, (∀ x, simple_func.eapprox_diff f n x ≤ g x) ∧ lower_semicontinuous g ∧
(∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, simple_func.eapprox_diff f n x ∂μ + δ n) :=
λ n, simple_func.exists_le_lower_semicontinuous_lintegral_ge μ
(simple_func.eapprox_diff f n) (δpos n).ne',
choose g f_le_g gcont hg using this,
refine ⟨λ x, (∑' n, g n x), λ x, _, _, _⟩,
{ rw ← tsum_eapprox_diff f hf,
exact ennreal.tsum_le_tsum (λ n, ennreal.coe_le_coe.2 (f_le_g n x)) },
{ apply lower_semicontinuous_tsum (λ n, _),
exact ennreal.continuous_coe.comp_lower_semicontinuous (gcont n)
(λ x y hxy, ennreal.coe_le_coe.2 hxy) },
{ calc ∫⁻ x, ∑' (n : ℕ), g n x ∂μ
= ∑' n, ∫⁻ x, g n x ∂μ :
by rw lintegral_tsum (λ n, (gcont n).measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal)
... ≤ ∑' n, (∫⁻ x, eapprox_diff f n x ∂μ + δ n) : ennreal.tsum_le_tsum hg
... = ∑' n, (∫⁻ x, eapprox_diff f n x ∂μ) + ∑' n, δ n : ennreal.tsum_add
... ≤ ∫⁻ (x : α), f x ∂μ + ε :
begin
refine add_le_add _ hδ.le,
rw [← lintegral_tsum],
{ simp_rw [tsum_eapprox_diff f hf, le_refl] },
{ assume n, exact (simple_func.measurable _).coe_nnreal_ennreal }
end }
end
/-- Given a measurable function `f` with values in `ℝ≥0` in a sigma-finite space, there exists a
lower semicontinuous function `g > f` with integral arbitrarily close to that of `f`.
Formulation in terms of `lintegral`.
Auxiliary lemma for Vitali-Carathéodory theorem `exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_lt`. -/
lemma exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_lintegral_ge [sigma_finite μ]
(f : α → ℝ≥0) (fmeas : measurable f) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε0 : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, (∀ x, (f x : ℝ≥0∞) < g x) ∧ lower_semicontinuous g ∧
(∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + ε) :=
begin
have : ε / 2 ≠ 0 := (ennreal.half_pos ε0).ne',
rcases exists_pos_lintegral_lt_of_sigma_finite μ this with ⟨w, wpos, wmeas, wint⟩,
let f' := λ x, ((f x + w x : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞),
rcases exists_le_lower_semicontinuous_lintegral_ge μ f' (fmeas.add wmeas).coe_nnreal_ennreal this
with ⟨g, le_g, gcont, gint⟩,
refine ⟨g, λ x, _, gcont, _⟩,
{ calc (f x : ℝ≥0∞) < f' x : by simpa [← ennreal.coe_lt_coe] using add_lt_add_left (wpos x) (f x)
... ≤ g x : le_g x },
{ calc ∫⁻ (x : α), g x ∂μ
≤ ∫⁻ (x : α), f x + w x ∂μ + ε / 2 : gint
... = ∫⁻ (x : α), f x ∂ μ + ∫⁻ (x : α), w x ∂ μ + (ε / 2) :
by rw lintegral_add fmeas.coe_nnreal_ennreal wmeas.coe_nnreal_ennreal
... ≤ ∫⁻ (x : α), f x ∂ μ + ε / 2 + ε / 2 :
add_le_add_right (add_le_add_left wint.le _) _
... = ∫⁻ (x : α), f x ∂μ + ε : by rw [add_assoc, ennreal.add_halves] },
end
/-- Given an almost everywhere measurable function `f` with values in `ℝ≥0` in a sigma-finite space,
there exists a lower semicontinuous function `g > f` with integral arbitrarily close to that of `f`.
Formulation in terms of `lintegral`.
Auxiliary lemma for Vitali-Carathéodory theorem `exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_lt`. -/
lemma exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_lintegral_ge_of_ae_measurable [sigma_finite μ]
(f : α → ℝ≥0) (fmeas : ae_measurable f μ) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε0 : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, (∀ x, (f x : ℝ≥0∞) < g x) ∧ lower_semicontinuous g ∧
(∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + ε) :=
begin
have : ε / 2 ≠ 0 := (ennreal.half_pos ε0).ne',
rcases exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_lintegral_ge μ (fmeas.mk f) fmeas.measurable_mk this
with ⟨g0, f_lt_g0, g0_cont, g0_int⟩,
rcases exists_measurable_superset_of_null fmeas.ae_eq_mk with ⟨s, hs, smeas, μs⟩,
rcases exists_le_lower_semicontinuous_lintegral_ge μ (s.indicator (λ x, ∞))
(measurable_const.indicator smeas) this
with ⟨g1, le_g1, g1_cont, g1_int⟩,
refine ⟨λ x, g0 x + g1 x, λ x, _, g0_cont.add g1_cont, _⟩,
{ by_cases h : x ∈ s,
{ have := le_g1 x,
simp only [h, set.indicator_of_mem, top_le_iff] at this,
simp [this] },
{ have : f x = fmeas.mk f x,
by { rw set.compl_subset_comm at hs, exact hs h },
rw this,
exact (f_lt_g0 x).trans_le le_self_add } },
{ calc ∫⁻ x, g0 x + g1 x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, g0 x ∂μ + ∫⁻ x, g1 x ∂μ :
lintegral_add g0_cont.measurable g1_cont.measurable
... ≤ (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + ε / 2) + (0 + ε / 2) :
begin
refine add_le_add _ _,
{ convert g0_int using 2,
exact lintegral_congr_ae (fmeas.ae_eq_mk.fun_comp _) },
{ convert g1_int,
simp only [smeas, μs, lintegral_const, set.univ_inter, measurable_set.univ,
lintegral_indicator, mul_zero, restrict_apply] }
end
... = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + ε : by simp only [add_assoc, ennreal.add_halves, zero_add] }
end
variable {μ}
/-- Given an integrable function `f` with values in `ℝ≥0` in a sigma-finite space, there exists a
lower semicontinuous function `g > f` with integral arbitrarily close to that of `f`.
Formulation in terms of `integral`.
Auxiliary lemma for Vitali-Carathéodory theorem `exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_lt`. -/
lemma exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_gt_nnreal [sigma_finite μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0)
(fint : integrable (λ x, (f x : ℝ)) μ) {ε : ℝ} (εpos : 0 < ε) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, (∀ x, (f x : ℝ≥0∞) < g x) ∧ lower_semicontinuous g ∧ (∀ᵐ x ∂ μ, g x < ⊤)
∧ (integrable (λ x, (g x).to_real) μ) ∧ (∫ x, (g x).to_real ∂μ < ∫ x, f x ∂μ + ε) :=
begin
have fmeas : ae_measurable f μ,
by { convert fint.ae_strongly_measurable.real_to_nnreal.ae_measurable, ext1 x,
simp only [real.to_nnreal_coe] },
lift ε to ℝ≥0 using εpos.le,
obtain ⟨δ, δpos, hδε⟩ : ∃ δ : ℝ≥0, 0 < δ ∧ δ < ε, from exists_between εpos,
have int_f_ne_top : ∫⁻ (a : α), (f a) ∂μ ≠ ∞ :=
(has_finite_integral_iff_of_nnreal.1 fint.has_finite_integral).ne,
rcases exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_lintegral_ge_of_ae_measurable μ f fmeas
(ennreal.coe_ne_zero.2 δpos.ne')
with ⟨g, f_lt_g, gcont, gint⟩,
have gint_ne : ∫⁻ (x : α), g x ∂μ ≠ ∞ := ne_top_of_le_ne_top (by simpa) gint,
have g_lt_top : ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, g x < ∞ := ae_lt_top gcont.measurable gint_ne,
have Ig : ∫⁻ (a : α), ennreal.of_real (g a).to_real ∂μ = ∫⁻ (a : α), g a ∂μ,
{ apply lintegral_congr_ae,
filter_upwards [g_lt_top] with _ hx,
simp only [hx.ne, ennreal.of_real_to_real, ne.def, not_false_iff], },
refine ⟨g, f_lt_g, gcont, g_lt_top, _, _⟩,
{ refine ⟨gcont.measurable.ennreal_to_real.ae_measurable.ae_strongly_measurable, _⟩,
simp only [has_finite_integral_iff_norm, real.norm_eq_abs,
abs_of_nonneg ennreal.to_real_nonneg],
convert gint_ne.lt_top using 1 },
{ rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae, integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae],
{ calc
ennreal.to_real (∫⁻ (a : α), ennreal.of_real (g a).to_real ∂μ)
= ennreal.to_real (∫⁻ (a : α), g a ∂μ) : by congr' 1
... ≤ ennreal.to_real (∫⁻ (a : α), f a ∂μ + δ) :
begin
apply ennreal.to_real_mono _ gint,
simpa using int_f_ne_top,
end
... = ennreal.to_real (∫⁻ (a : α), f a ∂μ) + δ :
by rw [ennreal.to_real_add int_f_ne_top ennreal.coe_ne_top, ennreal.coe_to_real]
... < ennreal.to_real (∫⁻ (a : α), f a ∂μ) + ε :
add_lt_add_left hδε _
... = (∫⁻ (a : α), ennreal.of_real ↑(f a) ∂μ).to_real + ε :
by simp },
{ apply filter.eventually_of_forall (λ x, _), simp },
{ exact fmeas.coe_nnreal_real.ae_strongly_measurable, },
{ apply filter.eventually_of_forall (λ x, _), simp },
{ apply gcont.measurable.ennreal_to_real.ae_measurable.ae_strongly_measurable } }
end
/-! ### Upper semicontinuous lower bound for nonnegative functions -/
/-- Given a simple function `f` with values in `ℝ≥0`, there exists an upper semicontinuous
function `g ≤ f` with integral arbitrarily close to that of `f`. Formulation in terms of
`lintegral`.
Auxiliary lemma for Vitali-Carathéodory theorem `exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_lt`. -/
lemma simple_func.exists_upper_semicontinuous_le_lintegral_le
(f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0) (int_f : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε0 : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0, (∀ x, g x ≤ f x) ∧ upper_semicontinuous g ∧ (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ + ε) :=
begin
induction f using measure_theory.simple_func.induction with c s hs f₁ f₂ H h₁ h₂ generalizing ε,
{ let f := simple_func.piecewise s hs (simple_func.const α c) (simple_func.const α 0),
by_cases hc : c = 0,
{ refine ⟨λ x, 0, _, upper_semicontinuous_const, _⟩,
{ simp only [hc, set.indicator_zero', pi.zero_apply, simple_func.const_zero, implies_true_iff,
eq_self_iff_true, simple_func.coe_zero, set.piecewise_eq_indicator,
simple_func.coe_piecewise, le_zero_iff] },
{ simp only [hc, set.indicator_zero', lintegral_const, zero_mul, pi.zero_apply,
simple_func.const_zero, zero_add, zero_le', simple_func.coe_zero,
set.piecewise_eq_indicator, ennreal.coe_zero, simple_func.coe_piecewise, zero_le] } },
have μs_lt_top : μ s < ∞,
by simpa only [hs, hc, lt_top_iff_ne_top, true_and, simple_func.coe_const, or_false,
lintegral_const, ennreal.coe_indicator, set.univ_inter, ennreal.coe_ne_top, restrict_apply
measurable_set.univ, with_top.mul_eq_top_iff, simple_func.const_zero, function.const_apply,
lintegral_indicator, ennreal.coe_eq_zero, ne.def, not_false_iff, simple_func.coe_zero,
set.piecewise_eq_indicator, simple_func.coe_piecewise, false_and] using int_f,
have : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < ε / c := ennreal.div_pos_iff.2 ⟨ε0, ennreal.coe_ne_top⟩,
obtain ⟨F, Fs, F_closed, μF⟩ : ∃ F ⊆ s, is_closed F ∧ μ s < μ F + ε / c :=
hs.exists_is_closed_lt_add μs_lt_top.ne this.ne',
refine ⟨set.indicator F (λ x, c), λ x, _,
F_closed.upper_semicontinuous_indicator (zero_le _), _⟩,
{ simp only [simple_func.coe_const, simple_func.const_zero, simple_func.coe_zero,
set.piecewise_eq_indicator, simple_func.coe_piecewise],
exact set.indicator_le_indicator_of_subset Fs (λ x, zero_le _) _ },
{ suffices : (c : ℝ≥0∞) * μ s ≤ c * μ F + ε,
by simpa only [hs, F_closed.measurable_set, simple_func.coe_const, function.const_apply,
lintegral_const, ennreal.coe_indicator, set.univ_inter, measurable_set.univ,
simple_func.const_zero, lintegral_indicator, simple_func.coe_zero,
set.piecewise_eq_indicator, simple_func.coe_piecewise, restrict_apply],
calc (c : ℝ≥0∞) * μ s ≤ c * (μ F + ε / c) : ennreal.mul_le_mul le_rfl μF.le
... = c * μ F + ε :
begin
simp_rw [mul_add],
rw ennreal.mul_div_cancel' _ ennreal.coe_ne_top,
simpa using hc,
end } },
{ have A : ∫⁻ (x : α), f₁ x ∂μ + ∫⁻ (x : α), f₂ x ∂μ ≠ ⊤,
by rwa ← lintegral_add f₁.measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal f₂.measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal ,
rcases h₁ (ennreal.add_ne_top.1 A).1 (ennreal.half_pos ε0).ne'
with ⟨g₁, f₁_le_g₁, g₁cont, g₁int⟩,
rcases h₂ (ennreal.add_ne_top.1 A).2 (ennreal.half_pos ε0).ne'
with ⟨g₂, f₂_le_g₂, g₂cont, g₂int⟩,
refine ⟨λ x, g₁ x + g₂ x, λ x, add_le_add (f₁_le_g₁ x) (f₂_le_g₂ x), g₁cont.add g₂cont, _⟩,
simp only [simple_func.coe_add, ennreal.coe_add, pi.add_apply],
rw [lintegral_add f₁.measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal f₂.measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal,
lintegral_add g₁cont.measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal g₂cont.measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal],
convert add_le_add g₁int g₂int using 1,
conv_lhs { rw ← ennreal.add_halves ε },
abel }
end
/-- Given an integrable function `f` with values in `ℝ≥0`, there exists an upper semicontinuous
function `g ≤ f` with integral arbitrarily close to that of `f`. Formulation in terms of
`lintegral`.
Auxiliary lemma for Vitali-Carathéodory theorem `exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_lt`. -/
lemma exists_upper_semicontinuous_le_lintegral_le
(f : α → ℝ≥0) (int_f : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε0 : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0, (∀ x, g x ≤ f x) ∧ upper_semicontinuous g ∧ (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ + ε) :=
begin
obtain ⟨fs, fs_le_f, int_fs⟩ : ∃ (fs : α →ₛ ℝ≥0), (∀ x, fs x ≤ f x) ∧
(∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, fs x ∂μ + ε/2) :=
begin
have := ennreal.lt_add_right int_f (ennreal.half_pos ε0).ne',
conv_rhs at this { rw lintegral_eq_nnreal (λ x, (f x : ℝ≥0∞)) μ },
erw ennreal.bsupr_add at this; [skip, exact ⟨0, λ x, by simp⟩],
simp only [lt_supr_iff] at this,
rcases this with ⟨fs, fs_le_f, int_fs⟩,
refine ⟨fs, λ x, by simpa only [ennreal.coe_le_coe] using fs_le_f x, _⟩,
convert int_fs.le,
rw ← simple_func.lintegral_eq_lintegral,
refl
end,
have int_fs_lt_top : ∫⁻ x, fs x ∂μ ≠ ∞,
{ apply ne_top_of_le_ne_top int_f (lintegral_mono (λ x, _)),
simpa only [ennreal.coe_le_coe] using fs_le_f x },
obtain ⟨g, g_le_fs, gcont, gint⟩ : ∃ g : α → ℝ≥0,
(∀ x, g x ≤ fs x) ∧ upper_semicontinuous g ∧ (∫⁻ x, fs x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ + ε/2) :=
fs.exists_upper_semicontinuous_le_lintegral_le int_fs_lt_top (ennreal.half_pos ε0).ne',
refine ⟨g, λ x, (g_le_fs x).trans (fs_le_f x), gcont, _⟩,
calc ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, fs x ∂μ + ε / 2 : int_fs
... ≤ (∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ + ε / 2) + ε / 2 : add_le_add gint le_rfl
... = ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ + ε : by rw [add_assoc, ennreal.add_halves]
end
/-- Given an integrable function `f` with values in `ℝ≥0`, there exists an upper semicontinuous
function `g ≤ f` with integral arbitrarily close to that of `f`. Formulation in terms of
`integral`.
Auxiliary lemma for Vitali-Carathéodory theorem `exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_lt`. -/
lemma exists_upper_semicontinuous_le_integral_le (f : α → ℝ≥0)
(fint : integrable (λ x, (f x : ℝ)) μ) {ε : ℝ} (εpos : 0 < ε) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0, (∀ x, g x ≤ f x) ∧ upper_semicontinuous g ∧ (integrable (λ x, (g x : ℝ)) μ)
∧ (∫ x, (f x : ℝ) ∂μ - ε ≤ ∫ x, g x ∂μ) :=
begin
lift ε to ℝ≥0 using εpos.le,
rw [nnreal.coe_pos, ← ennreal.coe_pos] at εpos,
have If : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂ μ < ∞ := has_finite_integral_iff_of_nnreal.1 fint.has_finite_integral,
rcases exists_upper_semicontinuous_le_lintegral_le f If.ne εpos.ne' with ⟨g, gf, gcont, gint⟩,
have Ig : ∫⁻ x, g x ∂ μ < ∞,
{ apply lt_of_le_of_lt (lintegral_mono (λ x, _)) If,
simpa using gf x },
refine ⟨g, gf, gcont, _, _⟩,
{ refine integrable.mono fint
gcont.measurable.coe_nnreal_real.ae_measurable.ae_strongly_measurable _,
exact filter.eventually_of_forall (λ x, by simp [gf x]) },
{ rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae, integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae],
{ rw sub_le_iff_le_add,
convert ennreal.to_real_mono _ gint,
{ simp, },
{ rw ennreal.to_real_add Ig.ne ennreal.coe_ne_top, simp },
{ simpa using Ig.ne } },
{ apply filter.eventually_of_forall, simp },
{ exact gcont.measurable.coe_nnreal_real.ae_measurable.ae_strongly_measurable },
{ apply filter.eventually_of_forall, simp },
{ exact fint.ae_strongly_measurable } }
end
/-! ### Vitali-Carathéodory theorem -/
/-- **Vitali-Carathéodory Theorem**: given an integrable real function `f`, there exists an
integrable function `g > f` which is lower semicontinuous, with integral arbitrarily close
to that of `f`. This function has to be `ereal`-valued in general. -/
lemma exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_lt [sigma_finite μ]
(f : α → ℝ) (hf : integrable f μ) {ε : ℝ} (εpos : 0 < ε) :
∃ g : α → ereal, (∀ x, (f x : ereal) < g x) ∧ lower_semicontinuous g ∧
(integrable (λ x, ereal.to_real (g x)) μ) ∧ (∀ᵐ x ∂ μ, g x < ⊤) ∧
(∫ x, ereal.to_real (g x) ∂μ < ∫ x, f x ∂μ + ε) :=
begin
let δ : ℝ≥0 := ⟨ε/2, (half_pos εpos).le⟩,
have δpos : 0 < δ := half_pos εpos,
let fp : α → ℝ≥0 := λ x, real.to_nnreal (f x),
have int_fp : integrable (λ x, (fp x : ℝ)) μ := hf.real_to_nnreal,
rcases exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_gt_nnreal fp int_fp δpos
with ⟨gp, fp_lt_gp, gpcont, gp_lt_top, gp_integrable, gpint⟩,
let fm : α → ℝ≥0 := λ x, real.to_nnreal (-f x),
have int_fm : integrable (λ x, (fm x : ℝ)) μ := hf.neg.real_to_nnreal,
rcases exists_upper_semicontinuous_le_integral_le fm int_fm δpos
with ⟨gm, gm_le_fm, gmcont, gm_integrable, gmint⟩,
let g : α → ereal := λ x, (gp x : ereal) - (gm x),
have ae_g : ∀ᵐ x ∂ μ, (g x).to_real = (gp x : ereal).to_real - (gm x : ereal).to_real,
{ filter_upwards [gp_lt_top] with _ hx,
rw ereal.to_real_sub;
simp [hx.ne], },
refine ⟨g, _, _, _, _, _⟩,
show integrable (λ x, ereal.to_real (g x)) μ,
{ rw integrable_congr ae_g,
convert gp_integrable.sub gm_integrable,
ext x,
simp },
show ∫ (x : α), (g x).to_real ∂μ < ∫ (x : α), f x ∂μ + ε, from calc
∫ (x : α), (g x).to_real ∂μ = ∫ (x : α), ereal.to_real (gp x) - ereal.to_real (gm x) ∂μ :
integral_congr_ae ae_g
... = ∫ (x : α), ereal.to_real (gp x) ∂ μ - ∫ (x : α), gm x ∂μ :
begin
simp only [ereal.to_real_coe_ennreal, ennreal.coe_to_real, coe_coe],
exact integral_sub gp_integrable gm_integrable,
end
... < ∫ (x : α), ↑(fp x) ∂μ + ↑δ - ∫ (x : α), gm x ∂μ :
begin
apply sub_lt_sub_right,
convert gpint,
simp only [ereal.to_real_coe_ennreal],
end
... ≤ ∫ (x : α), ↑(fp x) ∂μ + ↑δ - (∫ (x : α), fm x ∂μ - δ) :
sub_le_sub_left gmint _
... = ∫ (x : α), f x ∂μ + 2 * δ :
by { simp_rw [integral_eq_integral_pos_part_sub_integral_neg_part hf, fp, fm], ring }
... = ∫ (x : α), f x ∂μ + ε :
by { congr' 1, field_simp [δ, mul_comm] },
show ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, g x < ⊤,
{ filter_upwards [gp_lt_top] with _ hx,
simp [g, ereal.sub_eq_add_neg, lt_top_iff_ne_top, lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 hx], },
show ∀ x, (f x : ereal) < g x,
{ assume x,
rw ereal.coe_real_ereal_eq_coe_to_nnreal_sub_coe_to_nnreal (f x),
refine ereal.sub_lt_sub_of_lt_of_le _ _ _ _,
{ simp only [ereal.coe_ennreal_lt_coe_ennreal_iff, coe_coe], exact (fp_lt_gp x) },
{ simp only [ennreal.coe_le_coe, ereal.coe_ennreal_le_coe_ennreal_iff, coe_coe],
exact (gm_le_fm x) },
{ simp only [ereal.coe_ennreal_ne_bot, ne.def, not_false_iff, coe_coe] },
{ simp only [ereal.coe_nnreal_ne_top, ne.def, not_false_iff, coe_coe] } },
show lower_semicontinuous g,
{ apply lower_semicontinuous.add',
{ exact continuous_coe_ennreal_ereal.comp_lower_semicontinuous gpcont
(λ x y hxy, ereal.coe_ennreal_le_coe_ennreal_iff.2 hxy) },
{ apply ereal.continuous_neg.comp_upper_semicontinuous_antitone _
(λ x y hxy, ereal.neg_le_neg_iff.2 hxy),
dsimp,
apply continuous_coe_ennreal_ereal.comp_upper_semicontinuous _
(λ x y hxy, ereal.coe_ennreal_le_coe_ennreal_iff.2 hxy),
exact ennreal.continuous_coe.comp_upper_semicontinuous gmcont
(λ x y hxy, ennreal.coe_le_coe.2 hxy) },
{ assume x,
exact ereal.continuous_at_add (by simp) (by simp) } }
end
/-- **Vitali-Carathéodory Theorem**: given an integrable real function `f`, there exists an
integrable function `g < f` which is upper semicontinuous, with integral arbitrarily close to that
of `f`. This function has to be `ereal`-valued in general. -/
lemma exists_upper_semicontinuous_lt_integral_gt [sigma_finite μ]
(f : α → ℝ) (hf : integrable f μ) {ε : ℝ} (εpos : 0 < ε) :
∃ g : α → ereal, (∀ x, (g x : ereal) < f x) ∧ upper_semicontinuous g ∧
(integrable (λ x, ereal.to_real (g x)) μ) ∧ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ⊥ < g x) ∧
(∫ x, f x ∂μ < ∫ x, ereal.to_real (g x) ∂μ + ε) :=
begin
rcases exists_lt_lower_semicontinuous_integral_lt (λ x, - f x) hf.neg εpos
with ⟨g, g_lt_f, gcont, g_integrable, g_lt_top, gint⟩,
refine ⟨λ x, - g x, _, _, _, _, _⟩,
{ exact λ x, ereal.neg_lt_iff_neg_lt.1 (by simpa only [ereal.coe_neg] using g_lt_f x) },
{ exact ereal.continuous_neg.comp_lower_semicontinuous_antitone gcont
(λ x y hxy, ereal.neg_le_neg_iff.2 hxy) },
{ convert g_integrable.neg,
ext x,
simp },
{ simpa [bot_lt_iff_ne_bot, lt_top_iff_ne_top] using g_lt_top },
{ simp_rw [integral_neg, lt_neg_add_iff_add_lt] at gint,
rw add_comm at gint,
simpa [integral_neg] using gint }
end
end measure_theory
|
bfbd7e1915608994437edc2869193bafdd0a73d6 | 51241b440c9d9e72556bd50c272c2654f722af28 | /20170116_POPL/backchain/ematch.lean | 4b75afd2db03c8631c0691e9aa2598ee3ad9fa1c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jroesch/presentations | deb419a483a788fa6bf3c5b4949e151186e9ea6d | b64fd2bf65a64faf16c52729cde0436f0d2f2cca | refs/heads/master | 1,610,543,247,969 | 1,484,284,236,000 | 1,484,284,236,000 | 78,833,725 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,484,298,759,000 | 1,484,298,759,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,365 | lean | /- Lean also support E-matching: a heuristic lemma instantiation procedure
that is available in many SMT solver.
Goals such as mk_mem_list can also be discharged using heuristic instantiation. -/
open list tactic
universe variable u
lemma in_tail {α : Type u} {a : α} (b : α) {l : list α} : a ∈ l → a ∈ b::l := mem_cons_of_mem _
lemma in_head {α : Type u} (a : α) (l : list α) : a ∈ a::l := mem_cons_self _ _
lemma in_left {α : Type u} {a : α} {l : list α} (r : list α) : a ∈ l → a ∈ l ++ r := mem_append_left _
lemma in_right {α : Type u} {a : α} (l : list α) {r : list α} : a ∈ r → a ∈ l ++ r := mem_append_right _
/- Using ematching -/
example (a b c : nat) (l₁ l₂ : list nat) : a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ b::b::c::l₂ ++ b::c::l₁ ++ [c, c, b] :=
begin [smt]
repeat {ematch_using [in_left, in_right, in_head, in_tail], try {close}}
end
/- We mark lemmas for ematching. -/
attribute [ematch] in_left in_right in_head in_tail
example (a b c : nat) (l₁ l₂ : list nat) : a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ b::b::c::l₂ ++ b::c::l₁ ++ [c, c, b] :=
begin [smt]
repeat {ematch, try {close}}
end
/- The following example is not provable -/
example (a b c : nat) (l₁ l₂ : list nat) : a ∈ b::b::c::l₂ ++ b::c::l₁ ++ [c, c, b] :=
begin [smt]
repeat {ematch, try {close}}
end
|
4807671616f3776df35d3d8fc61992ff8c6be47a | dd0f5513e11c52db157d2fcc8456d9401a6cd9da | /04_Quantifiers_and_Equality.org.23.lean | 7934c9a9f953d8c6b8e38e02db851e4ad5d69cc7 | [] | no_license | cjmazey/lean-tutorial | ba559a49f82aa6c5848b9bf17b7389bf7f4ba645 | 381f61c9fcac56d01d959ae0fa6e376f2c4e3b34 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,286,098,832 | 1,447,124,923,000 | 1,447,124,923,000 | 43,082,433 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 424 | lean | /- page 56 -/
import standard
import data.nat
open nat
definition is_even (a : nat) := ∃ b, a = 2*b
-- BEGIN
theorem even_plus_even {a b : nat} (H1 : is_even a) (H2 : is_even b) :
is_even (a + b) :=
obtain (w1 : nat) (Hw1 : a = 2*w1), from H1,
obtain (w2 : nat) (Hw2 : b = 2*w2), from H2,
exists.intro (w1 + w2)
(calc
a + b = 2*w1 + b : Hw1
... = 2*w1 + 2*w2 : Hw2
... = 2*(w1 + w2) : mul.left_distrib)
-- END
|
49ac3266365a50e8c5a2eaf52bd0e9f668a117ce | 206422fb9edabf63def0ed2aa3f489150fb09ccb | /src/topology/order.lean | 6e5cb01877c3b32468c7e188c270ecd3a6bb1314 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | hamdysalah1/mathlib | b915f86b2503feeae268de369f1b16932321f097 | 95454452f6b3569bf967d35aab8d852b1ddf8017 | refs/heads/master | 1,677,154,116,545 | 1,611,797,994,000 | 1,611,797,994,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 29,337 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import topology.tactic
/-!
# Ordering on topologies and (co)induced topologies
Topologies on a fixed type `α` are ordered, by reverse inclusion.
That is, for topologies `t₁` and `t₂` on `α`, we write `t₁ ≤ t₂`
if every set open in `t₂` is also open in `t₁`.
(One also calls `t₁` finer than `t₂`, and `t₂` coarser than `t₁`.)
Any function `f : α → β` induces
`induced f : topological_space β → topological_space α`
and `coinduced f : topological_space α → topological_space β`.
Continuity, the ordering on topologies and (co)induced topologies are
related as follows:
* The identity map (α, t₁) → (α, t₂) is continuous iff t₁ ≤ t₂.
* A map f : (α, t) → (β, u) is continuous
iff t ≤ induced f u (`continuous_iff_le_induced`)
iff coinduced f t ≤ u (`continuous_iff_coinduced_le`).
Topologies on α form a complete lattice, with ⊥ the discrete topology
and ⊤ the indiscrete topology.
For a function f : α → β, (coinduced f, induced f) is a Galois connection
between topologies on α and topologies on β.
## Implementation notes
There is a Galois insertion between topologies on α (with the inclusion ordering)
and all collections of sets in α. The complete lattice structure on topologies
on α is defined as the reverse of the one obtained via this Galois insertion.
## Tags
finer, coarser, induced topology, coinduced topology
-/
open set filter classical
open_locale classical topological_space filter
universes u v w
namespace topological_space
variables {α : Type u}
/-- The open sets of the least topology containing a collection of basic sets. -/
inductive generate_open (g : set (set α)) : set α → Prop
| basic : ∀s∈g, generate_open s
| univ : generate_open univ
| inter : ∀s t, generate_open s → generate_open t → generate_open (s ∩ t)
| sUnion : ∀k, (∀s∈k, generate_open s) → generate_open (⋃₀ k)
/-- The smallest topological space containing the collection `g` of basic sets -/
def generate_from (g : set (set α)) : topological_space α :=
{ is_open := generate_open g,
is_open_univ := generate_open.univ,
is_open_inter := generate_open.inter,
is_open_sUnion := generate_open.sUnion }
lemma nhds_generate_from {g : set (set α)} {a : α} :
@nhds α (generate_from g) a = (⨅s∈{s | a ∈ s ∧ s ∈ g}, 𝓟 s) :=
by rw nhds_def; exact le_antisymm
(infi_le_infi $ assume s, infi_le_infi_const $ assume ⟨as, sg⟩, ⟨as, generate_open.basic _ sg⟩)
(le_infi $ assume s, le_infi $ assume ⟨as, hs⟩,
begin
revert as, clear_, induction hs,
case generate_open.basic : s hs
{ exact assume as, infi_le_of_le s $ infi_le _ ⟨as, hs⟩ },
case generate_open.univ
{ rw [principal_univ],
exact assume _, le_top },
case generate_open.inter : s t hs' ht' hs ht
{ exact assume ⟨has, hat⟩, calc _ ≤ 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t : le_inf (hs has) (ht hat)
... = _ : inf_principal },
case generate_open.sUnion : k hk' hk
{ exact λ ⟨t, htk, hat⟩, calc _ ≤ 𝓟 t : hk t htk hat
... ≤ _ : le_principal_iff.2 $ subset_sUnion_of_mem htk }
end)
lemma tendsto_nhds_generate_from {β : Type*} {m : α → β} {f : filter α} {g : set (set β)} {b : β}
(h : ∀s∈g, b ∈ s → m ⁻¹' s ∈ f) : tendsto m f (@nhds β (generate_from g) b) :=
by rw [nhds_generate_from]; exact
(tendsto_infi.2 $ assume s, tendsto_infi.2 $ assume ⟨hbs, hsg⟩, tendsto_principal.2 $ h s hsg hbs)
/-- Construct a topology on α given the filter of neighborhoods of each point of α. -/
protected def mk_of_nhds (n : α → filter α) : topological_space α :=
{ is_open := λs, ∀a∈s, s ∈ n a,
is_open_univ := assume x h, univ_mem_sets,
is_open_inter := assume s t hs ht x ⟨hxs, hxt⟩, inter_mem_sets (hs x hxs) (ht x hxt),
is_open_sUnion := assume s hs a ⟨x, hx, hxa⟩,
mem_sets_of_superset (hs x hx _ hxa) (set.subset_sUnion_of_mem hx) }
lemma nhds_mk_of_nhds (n : α → filter α) (a : α)
(h₀ : pure ≤ n) (h₁ : ∀{a s}, s ∈ n a → ∃ t ∈ n a, t ⊆ s ∧ ∀a' ∈ t, s ∈ n a') :
@nhds α (topological_space.mk_of_nhds n) a = n a :=
begin
letI := topological_space.mk_of_nhds n,
refine le_antisymm (assume s hs, _) (assume s hs, _),
{ have h₀ : {b | s ∈ n b} ⊆ s := assume b hb, mem_pure_sets.1 $ h₀ b hb,
have h₁ : {b | s ∈ n b} ∈ 𝓝 a,
{ refine mem_nhds_sets (assume b (hb : s ∈ n b), _) hs,
rcases h₁ hb with ⟨t, ht, hts, h⟩,
exact mem_sets_of_superset ht h },
exact mem_sets_of_superset h₁ h₀ },
{ rcases (@mem_nhds_sets_iff α (topological_space.mk_of_nhds n) _ _).1 hs with ⟨t, hts, ht, hat⟩,
exact (n a).sets_of_superset (ht _ hat) hts },
end
end topological_space
section lattice
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
/-- The inclusion ordering on topologies on α. We use it to get a complete
lattice instance via the Galois insertion method, but the partial order
that we will eventually impose on `topological_space α` is the reverse one. -/
def tmp_order : partial_order (topological_space α) :=
{ le := λt s, t.is_open ≤ s.is_open,
le_antisymm := assume t s h₁ h₂, topological_space_eq $ le_antisymm h₁ h₂,
le_refl := assume t, le_refl t.is_open,
le_trans := assume a b c h₁ h₂, @le_trans _ _ a.is_open b.is_open c.is_open h₁ h₂ }
local attribute [instance] tmp_order
/- We'll later restate this lemma in terms of the correct order on `topological_space α`. -/
private lemma generate_from_le_iff_subset_is_open {g : set (set α)} {t : topological_space α} :
topological_space.generate_from g ≤ t ↔ g ⊆ {s | t.is_open s} :=
iff.intro
(assume ht s hs, ht _ $ topological_space.generate_open.basic s hs)
(assume hg s hs, hs.rec_on (assume v hv, hg hv)
t.is_open_univ (assume u v _ _, t.is_open_inter u v) (assume k _, t.is_open_sUnion k))
/-- If `s` equals the collection of open sets in the topology it generates,
then `s` defines a topology. -/
protected def mk_of_closure (s : set (set α))
(hs : {u | (topological_space.generate_from s).is_open u} = s) : topological_space α :=
{ is_open := λu, u ∈ s,
is_open_univ := hs ▸ topological_space.generate_open.univ,
is_open_inter := hs ▸ topological_space.generate_open.inter,
is_open_sUnion := hs ▸ topological_space.generate_open.sUnion }
lemma mk_of_closure_sets {s : set (set α)}
{hs : {u | (topological_space.generate_from s).is_open u} = s} :
mk_of_closure s hs = topological_space.generate_from s :=
topological_space_eq hs.symm
/-- The Galois insertion between `set (set α)` and `topological_space α` whose lower part
sends a collection of subsets of α to the topology they generate, and whose upper part
sends a topology to its collection of open subsets. -/
def gi_generate_from (α : Type*) :
galois_insertion topological_space.generate_from (λt:topological_space α, {s | t.is_open s}) :=
{ gc := assume g t, generate_from_le_iff_subset_is_open,
le_l_u := assume ts s hs, topological_space.generate_open.basic s hs,
choice := λg hg, mk_of_closure g
(subset.antisymm hg $ generate_from_le_iff_subset_is_open.1 $ le_refl _),
choice_eq := assume s hs, mk_of_closure_sets }
lemma generate_from_mono {α} {g₁ g₂ : set (set α)} (h : g₁ ⊆ g₂) :
topological_space.generate_from g₁ ≤ topological_space.generate_from g₂ :=
(gi_generate_from _).gc.monotone_l h
/-- The complete lattice of topological spaces, but built on the inclusion ordering. -/
def tmp_complete_lattice {α : Type u} : complete_lattice (topological_space α) :=
(gi_generate_from α).lift_complete_lattice
/-- The ordering on topologies on the type `α`.
`t ≤ s` if every set open in `s` is also open in `t` (`t` is finer than `s`). -/
instance : partial_order (topological_space α) :=
{ le := λ t s, s.is_open ≤ t.is_open,
le_antisymm := assume t s h₁ h₂, topological_space_eq $ le_antisymm h₂ h₁,
le_refl := assume t, le_refl t.is_open,
le_trans := assume a b c h₁ h₂, le_trans h₂ h₁ }
lemma le_generate_from_iff_subset_is_open {g : set (set α)} {t : topological_space α} :
t ≤ topological_space.generate_from g ↔ g ⊆ {s | t.is_open s} :=
generate_from_le_iff_subset_is_open
/-- Topologies on `α` form a complete lattice, with `⊥` the discrete topology
and `⊤` the indiscrete topology. The infimum of a collection of topologies
is the topology generated by all their open sets, while the supremem is the
topology whose open sets are those sets open in every member of the collection. -/
instance : complete_lattice (topological_space α) :=
@order_dual.complete_lattice _ tmp_complete_lattice
/-- A topological space is discrete if every set is open, that is,
its topology equals the discrete topology `⊥`. -/
class discrete_topology (α : Type*) [t : topological_space α] : Prop :=
(eq_bot [] : t = ⊥)
@[simp] lemma is_open_discrete [topological_space α] [discrete_topology α] (s : set α) :
is_open s :=
(discrete_topology.eq_bot α).symm ▸ trivial
@[simp] lemma is_closed_discrete [topological_space α] [discrete_topology α] (s : set α) :
is_closed s :=
(discrete_topology.eq_bot α).symm ▸ trivial
lemma continuous_of_discrete_topology [topological_space α] [discrete_topology α]
[topological_space β] {f : α → β} : continuous f :=
continuous_def.2 $ λs hs, is_open_discrete _
lemma nhds_bot (α : Type*) : (@nhds α ⊥) = pure :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (@pure_le_nhds α ⊥),
assume a s hs,
exact @mem_nhds_sets α ⊥ a s trivial hs
end
lemma nhds_discrete (α : Type*) [topological_space α] [discrete_topology α] : (@nhds α _) = pure :=
(discrete_topology.eq_bot α).symm ▸ nhds_bot α
lemma le_of_nhds_le_nhds {t₁ t₂ : topological_space α} (h : ∀x, @nhds α t₁ x ≤ @nhds α t₂ x) :
t₁ ≤ t₂ :=
assume s, show @is_open α t₂ s → @is_open α t₁ s,
by { simp only [is_open_iff_nhds, le_principal_iff], exact assume hs a ha, h _ $ hs _ ha }
lemma eq_of_nhds_eq_nhds {t₁ t₂ : topological_space α} (h : ∀x, @nhds α t₁ x = @nhds α t₂ x) :
t₁ = t₂ :=
le_antisymm
(le_of_nhds_le_nhds $ assume x, le_of_eq $ h x)
(le_of_nhds_le_nhds $ assume x, le_of_eq $ (h x).symm)
lemma eq_bot_of_singletons_open {t : topological_space α} (h : ∀ x, t.is_open {x}) : t = ⊥ :=
bot_unique $ λ s hs, bUnion_of_singleton s ▸ is_open_bUnion (λ x _, h x)
lemma forall_open_iff_discrete {X : Type*} [topological_space X] :
(∀ s : set X, is_open s) ↔ discrete_topology X :=
⟨λ h, ⟨by { ext U , show is_open U ↔ true, simp [h U] }⟩, λ a, @is_open_discrete _ _ a⟩
lemma singletons_open_iff_discrete {X : Type*} [topological_space X] :
(∀ a : X, is_open ({a} : set X)) ↔ discrete_topology X :=
⟨λ h, ⟨eq_bot_of_singletons_open h⟩, λ a _, @is_open_discrete _ _ a _⟩
end lattice
section galois_connection
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
/-- Given `f : α → β` and a topology on `β`, the induced topology on `α` is the collection of
sets that are preimages of some open set in `β`. This is the coarsest topology that
makes `f` continuous. -/
def topological_space.induced {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (t : topological_space β) :
topological_space α :=
{ is_open := λs, ∃s', t.is_open s' ∧ f ⁻¹' s' = s,
is_open_univ := ⟨univ, t.is_open_univ, preimage_univ⟩,
is_open_inter := by rintro s₁ s₂ ⟨s'₁, hs₁, rfl⟩ ⟨s'₂, hs₂, rfl⟩;
exact ⟨s'₁ ∩ s'₂, t.is_open_inter _ _ hs₁ hs₂, preimage_inter⟩,
is_open_sUnion := assume s h,
begin
simp only [classical.skolem] at h,
cases h with f hf,
apply exists.intro (⋃(x : set α) (h : x ∈ s), f x h),
simp only [sUnion_eq_bUnion, preimage_Union, (λx h, (hf x h).right)], refine ⟨_, rfl⟩,
exact (@is_open_Union β _ t _ $ assume i,
show is_open (⋃h, f i h), from @is_open_Union β _ t _ $ assume h, (hf i h).left)
end }
lemma is_open_induced_iff [t : topological_space β] {s : set α} {f : α → β} :
@is_open α (t.induced f) s ↔ (∃t, is_open t ∧ f ⁻¹' t = s) :=
iff.rfl
lemma is_closed_induced_iff [t : topological_space β] {s : set α} {f : α → β} :
@is_closed α (t.induced f) s ↔ (∃t, is_closed t ∧ s = f ⁻¹' t) :=
⟨assume ⟨t, ht, heq⟩, ⟨tᶜ, is_closed_compl_iff.2 ht,
by simp only [preimage_compl, heq, compl_compl]⟩,
assume ⟨t, ht, heq⟩, ⟨tᶜ, ht, by simp only [preimage_compl, heq.symm]⟩⟩
/-- Given `f : α → β` and a topology on `α`, the coinduced topology on `β` is defined
such that `s:set β` is open if the preimage of `s` is open. This is the finest topology that
makes `f` continuous. -/
def topological_space.coinduced {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (t : topological_space α) :
topological_space β :=
{ is_open := λs, t.is_open (f ⁻¹' s),
is_open_univ := by rw preimage_univ; exact t.is_open_univ,
is_open_inter := assume s₁ s₂ h₁ h₂, by rw preimage_inter; exact t.is_open_inter _ _ h₁ h₂,
is_open_sUnion := assume s h, by rw [preimage_sUnion]; exact (@is_open_Union _ _ t _ $ assume i,
show is_open (⋃ (H : i ∈ s), f ⁻¹' i), from
@is_open_Union _ _ t _ $ assume hi, h i hi) }
lemma is_open_coinduced {t : topological_space α} {s : set β} {f : α → β} :
@is_open β (topological_space.coinduced f t) s ↔ is_open (f ⁻¹' s) :=
iff.rfl
variables {t t₁ t₂ : topological_space α} {t' : topological_space β} {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
lemma continuous.coinduced_le (h : @continuous α β t t' f) :
t.coinduced f ≤ t' :=
λ s hs, (continuous_def.1 h s hs : _)
lemma coinduced_le_iff_le_induced {f : α → β} {tα : topological_space α}
{tβ : topological_space β} :
tα.coinduced f ≤ tβ ↔ tα ≤ tβ.induced f :=
iff.intro
(assume h s ⟨t, ht, hst⟩, hst ▸ h _ ht)
(assume h s hs, show tα.is_open (f ⁻¹' s), from h _ ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩)
lemma continuous.le_induced (h : @continuous α β t t' f) :
t ≤ t'.induced f :=
coinduced_le_iff_le_induced.1 h.coinduced_le
lemma gc_coinduced_induced (f : α → β) :
galois_connection (topological_space.coinduced f) (topological_space.induced f) :=
assume f g, coinduced_le_iff_le_induced
lemma induced_mono (h : t₁ ≤ t₂) : t₁.induced g ≤ t₂.induced g :=
(gc_coinduced_induced g).monotone_u h
lemma coinduced_mono (h : t₁ ≤ t₂) : t₁.coinduced f ≤ t₂.coinduced f :=
(gc_coinduced_induced f).monotone_l h
@[simp] lemma induced_top : (⊤ : topological_space α).induced g = ⊤ :=
(gc_coinduced_induced g).u_top
@[simp] lemma induced_inf : (t₁ ⊓ t₂).induced g = t₁.induced g ⊓ t₂.induced g :=
(gc_coinduced_induced g).u_inf
@[simp] lemma induced_infi {ι : Sort w} {t : ι → topological_space α} :
(⨅i, t i).induced g = (⨅i, (t i).induced g) :=
(gc_coinduced_induced g).u_infi
@[simp] lemma coinduced_bot : (⊥ : topological_space α).coinduced f = ⊥ :=
(gc_coinduced_induced f).l_bot
@[simp] lemma coinduced_sup : (t₁ ⊔ t₂).coinduced f = t₁.coinduced f ⊔ t₂.coinduced f :=
(gc_coinduced_induced f).l_sup
@[simp] lemma coinduced_supr {ι : Sort w} {t : ι → topological_space α} :
(⨆i, t i).coinduced f = (⨆i, (t i).coinduced f) :=
(gc_coinduced_induced f).l_supr
lemma induced_id [t : topological_space α] : t.induced id = t :=
topological_space_eq $ funext $ assume s, propext $
⟨assume ⟨s', hs, h⟩, h ▸ hs, assume hs, ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩⟩
lemma induced_compose [tγ : topological_space γ]
{f : α → β} {g : β → γ} : (tγ.induced g).induced f = tγ.induced (g ∘ f) :=
topological_space_eq $ funext $ assume s, propext $
⟨assume ⟨s', ⟨s, hs, h₂⟩, h₁⟩, h₁ ▸ h₂ ▸ ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩,
assume ⟨s, hs, h⟩, ⟨preimage g s, ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩, h ▸ rfl⟩⟩
lemma coinduced_id [t : topological_space α] : t.coinduced id = t :=
topological_space_eq rfl
lemma coinduced_compose [tα : topological_space α]
{f : α → β} {g : β → γ} : (tα.coinduced f).coinduced g = tα.coinduced (g ∘ f) :=
topological_space_eq rfl
end galois_connection
/- constructions using the complete lattice structure -/
section constructions
open topological_space
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
instance inhabited_topological_space {α : Type u} : inhabited (topological_space α) :=
⟨⊤⟩
@[priority 100]
instance subsingleton.unique_topological_space [subsingleton α] :
unique (topological_space α) :=
{ default := ⊥,
uniq := λ t, eq_bot_of_singletons_open $ λ x, subsingleton.set_cases
(@is_open_empty _ t) (@is_open_univ _ t) ({x} : set α) }
@[priority 100]
instance subsingleton.discrete_topology [t : topological_space α] [subsingleton α] :
discrete_topology α :=
⟨unique.eq_default t⟩
instance : topological_space empty := ⊥
instance : discrete_topology empty := ⟨rfl⟩
instance : topological_space pempty := ⊥
instance : discrete_topology pempty := ⟨rfl⟩
instance : topological_space unit := ⊥
instance : discrete_topology unit := ⟨rfl⟩
instance : topological_space bool := ⊥
instance : discrete_topology bool := ⟨rfl⟩
instance : topological_space ℕ := ⊥
instance : discrete_topology ℕ := ⟨rfl⟩
instance : topological_space ℤ := ⊥
instance : discrete_topology ℤ := ⟨rfl⟩
instance sierpinski_space : topological_space Prop :=
generate_from {{true}}
lemma le_generate_from {t : topological_space α} { g : set (set α) } (h : ∀s∈g, is_open s) :
t ≤ generate_from g :=
le_generate_from_iff_subset_is_open.2 h
lemma induced_generate_from_eq {α β} {b : set (set β)} {f : α → β} :
(generate_from b).induced f = topological_space.generate_from (preimage f '' b) :=
le_antisymm
(le_generate_from $ ball_image_iff.2 $ assume s hs, ⟨s, generate_open.basic _ hs, rfl⟩)
(coinduced_le_iff_le_induced.1 $ le_generate_from $ assume s hs,
generate_open.basic _ $ mem_image_of_mem _ hs)
/-- This construction is left adjoint to the operation sending a topology on `α`
to its neighborhood filter at a fixed point `a : α`. -/
protected def topological_space.nhds_adjoint (a : α) (f : filter α) : topological_space α :=
{ is_open := λs, a ∈ s → s ∈ f,
is_open_univ := assume s, univ_mem_sets,
is_open_inter := assume s t hs ht ⟨has, hat⟩, inter_mem_sets (hs has) (ht hat),
is_open_sUnion := assume k hk ⟨u, hu, hau⟩, mem_sets_of_superset (hk u hu hau)
(subset_sUnion_of_mem hu) }
lemma gc_nhds (a : α) :
galois_connection (topological_space.nhds_adjoint a) (λt, @nhds α t a) :=
assume f t, by { rw le_nhds_iff, exact ⟨λ H s hs has, H _ has hs, λ H s has hs, H _ hs has⟩ }
lemma nhds_mono {t₁ t₂ : topological_space α} {a : α} (h : t₁ ≤ t₂) :
@nhds α t₁ a ≤ @nhds α t₂ a := (gc_nhds a).monotone_u h
lemma nhds_infi {ι : Sort*} {t : ι → topological_space α} {a : α} :
@nhds α (infi t) a = (⨅i, @nhds α (t i) a) := (gc_nhds a).u_infi
lemma nhds_Inf {s : set (topological_space α)} {a : α} :
@nhds α (Inf s) a = (⨅t∈s, @nhds α t a) := (gc_nhds a).u_Inf
lemma nhds_inf {t₁ t₂ : topological_space α} {a : α} :
@nhds α (t₁ ⊓ t₂) a = @nhds α t₁ a ⊓ @nhds α t₂ a := (gc_nhds a).u_inf
lemma nhds_top {a : α} : @nhds α ⊤ a = ⊤ := (gc_nhds a).u_top
local notation `cont` := @continuous _ _
local notation `tspace` := topological_space
open topological_space
variables {γ : Type*} {f : α → β} {ι : Sort*}
lemma continuous_iff_coinduced_le {t₁ : tspace α} {t₂ : tspace β} :
cont t₁ t₂ f ↔ coinduced f t₁ ≤ t₂ :=
continuous_def.trans iff.rfl
lemma continuous_iff_le_induced {t₁ : tspace α} {t₂ : tspace β} :
cont t₁ t₂ f ↔ t₁ ≤ induced f t₂ :=
iff.trans continuous_iff_coinduced_le (gc_coinduced_induced f _ _)
theorem continuous_generated_from {t : tspace α} {b : set (set β)}
(h : ∀s∈b, is_open (f ⁻¹' s)) : cont t (generate_from b) f :=
continuous_iff_coinduced_le.2 $ le_generate_from h
lemma continuous_induced_dom {t : tspace β} : cont (induced f t) t f :=
by { rw continuous_def, assume s h, exact ⟨_, h, rfl⟩ }
lemma continuous_induced_rng {g : γ → α} {t₂ : tspace β} {t₁ : tspace γ}
(h : cont t₁ t₂ (f ∘ g)) : cont t₁ (induced f t₂) g :=
begin
rw continuous_def,
rintros s ⟨t, ht, s_eq⟩,
simpa [← s_eq] using continuous_def.1 h t ht,
end
lemma continuous_induced_rng' [topological_space α] [topological_space β] [topological_space γ]
{g : γ → α} (f : α → β) (H : ‹topological_space α› = ‹topological_space β›.induced f)
(h : continuous (f ∘ g)) : continuous g :=
H.symm ▸ continuous_induced_rng h
lemma continuous_coinduced_rng {t : tspace α} : cont t (coinduced f t) f :=
by { rw continuous_def, assume s h, exact h }
lemma continuous_coinduced_dom {g : β → γ} {t₁ : tspace α} {t₂ : tspace γ}
(h : cont t₁ t₂ (g ∘ f)) : cont (coinduced f t₁) t₂ g :=
begin
rw continuous_def at h ⊢,
assume s hs,
exact h _ hs
end
lemma continuous_le_dom {t₁ t₂ : tspace α} {t₃ : tspace β}
(h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₁) (h₂ : cont t₁ t₃ f) : cont t₂ t₃ f :=
begin
rw continuous_def at h₂ ⊢,
assume s h,
exact h₁ _ (h₂ s h)
end
lemma continuous_le_rng {t₁ : tspace α} {t₂ t₃ : tspace β}
(h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₃) (h₂ : cont t₁ t₂ f) : cont t₁ t₃ f :=
begin
rw continuous_def at h₂ ⊢,
assume s h,
exact h₂ s (h₁ s h)
end
lemma continuous_sup_dom {t₁ t₂ : tspace α} {t₃ : tspace β}
(h₁ : cont t₁ t₃ f) (h₂ : cont t₂ t₃ f) : cont (t₁ ⊔ t₂) t₃ f :=
begin
rw continuous_def at h₁ h₂ ⊢,
assume s h,
exact ⟨h₁ s h, h₂ s h⟩
end
lemma continuous_sup_rng_left {t₁ : tspace α} {t₃ t₂ : tspace β} :
cont t₁ t₂ f → cont t₁ (t₂ ⊔ t₃) f :=
continuous_le_rng le_sup_left
lemma continuous_sup_rng_right {t₁ : tspace α} {t₃ t₂ : tspace β} :
cont t₁ t₃ f → cont t₁ (t₂ ⊔ t₃) f :=
continuous_le_rng le_sup_right
lemma continuous_Sup_dom {t₁ : set (tspace α)} {t₂ : tspace β}
(h : ∀t∈t₁, cont t t₂ f) : cont (Sup t₁) t₂ f :=
continuous_iff_le_induced.2 $ Sup_le $ assume t ht, continuous_iff_le_induced.1 $ h t ht
lemma continuous_Sup_rng {t₁ : tspace α} {t₂ : set (tspace β)} {t : tspace β}
(h₁ : t ∈ t₂) (hf : cont t₁ t f) : cont t₁ (Sup t₂) f :=
continuous_iff_coinduced_le.2 $ le_Sup_of_le h₁ $ continuous_iff_coinduced_le.1 hf
lemma continuous_supr_dom {t₁ : ι → tspace α} {t₂ : tspace β}
(h : ∀i, cont (t₁ i) t₂ f) : cont (supr t₁) t₂ f :=
continuous_Sup_dom $ assume t ⟨i, (t_eq : t₁ i = t)⟩, t_eq ▸ h i
lemma continuous_supr_rng {t₁ : tspace α} {t₂ : ι → tspace β} {i : ι}
(h : cont t₁ (t₂ i) f) : cont t₁ (supr t₂) f :=
continuous_Sup_rng ⟨i, rfl⟩ h
lemma continuous_inf_rng {t₁ : tspace α} {t₂ t₃ : tspace β}
(h₁ : cont t₁ t₂ f) (h₂ : cont t₁ t₃ f) : cont t₁ (t₂ ⊓ t₃) f :=
continuous_iff_coinduced_le.2 $ le_inf
(continuous_iff_coinduced_le.1 h₁)
(continuous_iff_coinduced_le.1 h₂)
lemma continuous_inf_dom_left {t₁ t₂ : tspace α} {t₃ : tspace β} :
cont t₁ t₃ f → cont (t₁ ⊓ t₂) t₃ f :=
continuous_le_dom inf_le_left
lemma continuous_inf_dom_right {t₁ t₂ : tspace α} {t₃ : tspace β} :
cont t₂ t₃ f → cont (t₁ ⊓ t₂) t₃ f :=
continuous_le_dom inf_le_right
lemma continuous_Inf_dom {t₁ : set (tspace α)} {t₂ : tspace β} {t : tspace α} (h₁ : t ∈ t₁) :
cont t t₂ f → cont (Inf t₁) t₂ f :=
continuous_le_dom $ Inf_le h₁
lemma continuous_Inf_rng {t₁ : tspace α} {t₂ : set (tspace β)}
(h : ∀t∈t₂, cont t₁ t f) : cont t₁ (Inf t₂) f :=
continuous_iff_coinduced_le.2 $ le_Inf $ assume b hb, continuous_iff_coinduced_le.1 $ h b hb
lemma continuous_infi_dom {t₁ : ι → tspace α} {t₂ : tspace β} {i : ι} :
cont (t₁ i) t₂ f → cont (infi t₁) t₂ f :=
continuous_le_dom $ infi_le _ _
lemma continuous_infi_rng {t₁ : tspace α} {t₂ : ι → tspace β}
(h : ∀i, cont t₁ (t₂ i) f) : cont t₁ (infi t₂) f :=
continuous_iff_coinduced_le.2 $ le_infi $ assume i, continuous_iff_coinduced_le.1 $ h i
@[continuity] lemma continuous_bot {t : tspace β} : cont ⊥ t f :=
continuous_iff_le_induced.2 $ bot_le
@[continuity] lemma continuous_top {t : tspace α} : cont t ⊤ f :=
continuous_iff_coinduced_le.2 $ le_top
/- 𝓝 in the induced topology -/
theorem mem_nhds_induced [T : topological_space α] (f : β → α) (a : β) (s : set β) :
s ∈ @nhds β (topological_space.induced f T) a ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 (f a), f ⁻¹' u ⊆ s :=
begin
simp only [mem_nhds_sets_iff, is_open_induced_iff, exists_prop, set.mem_set_of_eq],
split,
{ rintros ⟨u, usub, ⟨v, openv, ueq⟩, au⟩,
exact ⟨v, ⟨v, set.subset.refl v, openv, by rwa ←ueq at au⟩, by rw ueq; exact usub⟩ },
rintros ⟨u, ⟨v, vsubu, openv, amem⟩, finvsub⟩,
exact ⟨f ⁻¹' v, set.subset.trans (set.preimage_mono vsubu) finvsub, ⟨⟨v, openv, rfl⟩, amem⟩⟩
end
theorem nhds_induced [T : topological_space α] (f : β → α) (a : β) :
@nhds β (topological_space.induced f T) a = comap f (𝓝 (f a)) :=
by { ext s, rw [mem_nhds_induced, mem_comap_sets] }
lemma induced_iff_nhds_eq [tα : topological_space α] [tβ : topological_space β] (f : β → α) :
tβ = tα.induced f ↔ ∀ b, 𝓝 b = comap f (𝓝 $ f b) :=
⟨λ h a, h.symm ▸ nhds_induced f a, λ h, eq_of_nhds_eq_nhds $ λ x, by rw [h, nhds_induced]⟩
theorem map_nhds_induced_of_surjective [T : topological_space α]
{f : β → α} (hf : function.surjective f) (a : β) :
map f (@nhds β (topological_space.induced f T) a) = 𝓝 (f a) :=
by rw [nhds_induced, map_comap_of_surjective hf]
end constructions
section induced
open topological_space
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
variables [t : topological_space β] {f : α → β}
theorem is_open_induced_eq {s : set α} :
@is_open _ (induced f t) s ↔ s ∈ preimage f '' {s | is_open s} :=
iff.rfl
theorem is_open_induced {s : set β} (h : is_open s) : (induced f t).is_open (f ⁻¹' s) :=
⟨s, h, rfl⟩
lemma map_nhds_induced_eq {a : α} (h : range f ∈ 𝓝 (f a)) :
map f (@nhds α (induced f t) a) = 𝓝 (f a) :=
by rw [nhds_induced, filter.map_comap h]
lemma closure_induced [t : topological_space β] {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : set α}
(hf : ∀x y, f x = f y → x = y) :
a ∈ @closure α (topological_space.induced f t) s ↔ f a ∈ closure (f '' s) :=
have ne_bot (comap f (𝓝 (f a) ⊓ 𝓟 (f '' s))) ↔ ne_bot (𝓝 (f a) ⊓ 𝓟 (f '' s)),
from ⟨assume h₁ h₂, h₁ $ h₂.symm ▸ comap_bot,
assume h,
forall_sets_nonempty_iff_ne_bot.mp $
assume s₁ ⟨s₂, hs₂, (hs : f ⁻¹' s₂ ⊆ s₁)⟩,
have f '' s ∈ 𝓝 (f a) ⊓ 𝓟 (f '' s),
from mem_inf_sets_of_right $ by simp [subset.refl],
have s₂ ∩ f '' s ∈ 𝓝 (f a) ⊓ 𝓟 (f '' s),
from inter_mem_sets hs₂ this,
let ⟨b, hb₁, ⟨a, ha, ha₂⟩⟩ := h.nonempty_of_mem this in
⟨_, hs $ by rwa [←ha₂] at hb₁⟩⟩,
calc a ∈ @closure α (topological_space.induced f t) s
↔ (@nhds α (topological_space.induced f t) a) ⊓ 𝓟 s ≠ ⊥ : by rw [closure_eq_cluster_pts]; refl
... ↔ comap f (𝓝 (f a)) ⊓ 𝓟 (f ⁻¹' (f '' s)) ≠ ⊥ : by rw [nhds_induced, preimage_image_eq _ hf]
... ↔ comap f (𝓝 (f a) ⊓ 𝓟 (f '' s)) ≠ ⊥ : by rw [comap_inf, ←comap_principal]
... ↔ _ : by rwa [closure_eq_cluster_pts]
end induced
section sierpinski
variables {α : Type*} [topological_space α]
@[simp] lemma is_open_singleton_true : is_open ({true} : set Prop) :=
topological_space.generate_open.basic _ (by simp)
lemma continuous_Prop {p : α → Prop} : continuous p ↔ is_open {x | p x} :=
⟨assume h : continuous p,
have is_open (p ⁻¹' {true}),
from is_open_singleton_true.preimage h,
by simp [preimage, eq_true] at this; assumption,
assume h : is_open {x | p x},
continuous_generated_from $ assume s (hs : s ∈ {{true}}),
by simp at hs; simp [hs, preimage, eq_true, h]⟩
end sierpinski
section infi
variables {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {t : ι → topological_space α}
lemma is_open_supr_iff {s : set α} : @is_open _ (⨆ i, t i) s ↔ ∀ i, @is_open _ (t i) s :=
begin
-- s defines a map from α to Prop, which is continuous iff s is open.
suffices : @continuous _ _ (⨆ i, t i) _ s ↔ ∀ i, @continuous _ _ (t i) _ s,
{ simpa only [continuous_Prop] using this },
simp only [continuous_iff_le_induced, supr_le_iff]
end
lemma is_closed_infi_iff {s : set α} : @is_closed _ (⨆ i, t i) s ↔ ∀ i, @is_closed _ (t i) s :=
is_open_supr_iff
end infi
|
0dea5e74a60c6b0459f5cc1e2f3a5c0e62aca9a7 | f7315930643edc12e76c229a742d5446dad77097 | /library/init/logic.lean | 95c28f0f471cb8936c0a42beaa341724ee11c2b6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | bmalehorn/lean | 8f77b762a76c59afff7b7403f9eb5fc2c3ce70c1 | 53653c352643751c4b62ff63ec5e555f11dae8eb | refs/heads/master | 1,610,945,684,489 | 1,429,681,220,000 | 1,429,681,449,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 16,184 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Module: init.logic
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Floris van Doorn
-/
prelude
import init.datatypes init.reserved_notation
/- implication -/
definition trivial := true.intro
definition not (a : Prop) := a → false
prefix `¬` := not
definition absurd {a : Prop} {b : Type} (H1 : a) (H2 : ¬a) : b :=
false.rec b (H2 H1)
/- not -/
theorem not_false : ¬false :=
assume H : false, H
definition non_contradictory (a : Prop) : Prop := ¬¬a
theorem non_contradictory_intro {a : Prop} (Ha : a) : ¬¬a :=
assume Hna : ¬a, absurd Ha Hna
/- eq -/
notation a = b := eq a b
definition rfl {A : Type} {a : A} := eq.refl a
-- proof irrelevance is built in
theorem proof_irrel {a : Prop} (H₁ H₂ : a) : H₁ = H₂ :=
rfl
namespace eq
variables {A : Type}
variables {a b c a': A}
theorem subst {P : A → Prop} (H₁ : a = b) (H₂ : P a) : P b :=
eq.rec H₂ H₁
theorem trans (H₁ : a = b) (H₂ : b = c) : a = c :=
subst H₂ H₁
definition symm (H : a = b) : b = a :=
eq.rec (refl a) H
namespace ops
notation H `⁻¹` := symm H --input with \sy or \-1 or \inv
notation H1 ⬝ H2 := trans H1 H2
notation H1 ▸ H2 := subst H1 H2
end ops
end eq
section
variables {A : Type} {a b c: A}
open eq.ops
definition trans_rel_left (R : A → A → Prop) (H₁ : R a b) (H₂ : b = c) : R a c :=
H₂ ▸ H₁
definition trans_rel_right (R : A → A → Prop) (H₁ : a = b) (H₂ : R b c) : R a c :=
H₁⁻¹ ▸ H₂
end
section
variable {p : Prop}
open eq.ops
theorem of_eq_true (H : p = true) : p :=
H⁻¹ ▸ trivial
theorem not_of_eq_false (H : p = false) : ¬p :=
assume Hp, H ▸ Hp
end
calc_subst eq.subst
calc_refl eq.refl
calc_trans eq.trans
calc_symm eq.symm
/- ne -/
definition ne {A : Type} (a b : A) := ¬(a = b)
notation a ≠ b := ne a b
namespace ne
open eq.ops
variable {A : Type}
variables {a b : A}
theorem intro : (a = b → false) → a ≠ b :=
assume H, H
theorem elim : a ≠ b → a = b → false :=
assume H₁ H₂, H₁ H₂
theorem irrefl : a ≠ a → false :=
assume H, H rfl
theorem symm : a ≠ b → b ≠ a :=
assume (H : a ≠ b) (H₁ : b = a), H (H₁⁻¹)
end ne
section
open eq.ops
variables {A : Type} {a b c : A}
theorem false.of_ne : a ≠ a → false :=
assume H, H rfl
end
infixl `==`:50 := heq
namespace heq
universe variable u
variables {A B C : Type.{u}} {a a' : A} {b b' : B} {c : C}
definition to_eq (H : a == a') : a = a' :=
have H₁ : ∀ (Ht : A = A), eq.rec_on Ht a = a, from
λ Ht, eq.refl (eq.rec_on Ht a),
heq.rec_on H H₁ (eq.refl A)
definition elim {A : Type} {a : A} {P : A → Type} {b : A} (H₁ : a == b) (H₂ : P a) : P b :=
eq.rec_on (to_eq H₁) H₂
theorem subst {P : ∀T : Type, T → Prop} (H₁ : a == b) (H₂ : P A a) : P B b :=
heq.rec_on H₁ H₂
theorem symm (H : a == b) : b == a :=
heq.rec_on H (refl a)
theorem of_eq (H : a = a') : a == a' :=
eq.subst H (refl a)
theorem trans (H₁ : a == b) (H₂ : b == c) : a == c :=
subst H₂ H₁
theorem of_heq_of_eq (H₁ : a == b) (H₂ : b = b') : a == b' :=
trans H₁ (of_eq H₂)
theorem of_eq_of_heq (H₁ : a = a') (H₂ : a' == b) : a == b :=
trans (of_eq H₁) H₂
end heq
theorem of_heq_true {a : Prop} (H : a == true) : a :=
of_eq_true (heq.to_eq H)
calc_trans heq.trans
calc_trans heq.of_heq_of_eq
calc_trans heq.of_eq_of_heq
calc_symm heq.symm
/- and -/
notation a /\ b := and a b
notation a ∧ b := and a b
variables {a b c d : Prop}
theorem and.elim (H₁ : a ∧ b) (H₂ : a → b → c) : c :=
and.rec H₂ H₁
/- or -/
notation a `\/` b := or a b
notation a ∨ b := or a b
namespace or
theorem elim (H₁ : a ∨ b) (H₂ : a → c) (H₃ : b → c) : c :=
or.rec H₂ H₃ H₁
end or
theorem non_contradictory_em (a : Prop) : ¬¬(a ∨ ¬a) :=
assume not_em : ¬(a ∨ ¬a),
have neg_a : ¬a, from
assume pos_a : a, absurd (or.inl pos_a) not_em,
absurd (or.inr neg_a) not_em
/- iff -/
definition iff (a b : Prop) := (a → b) ∧ (b → a)
notation a <-> b := iff a b
notation a ↔ b := iff a b
namespace iff
definition intro (H₁ : a → b) (H₂ : b → a) : a ↔ b :=
and.intro H₁ H₂
definition elim (H₁ : (a → b) → (b → a) → c) (H₂ : a ↔ b) : c :=
and.rec H₁ H₂
definition elim_left (H : a ↔ b) : a → b :=
elim (assume H₁ H₂, H₁) H
definition mp := @elim_left
definition elim_right (H : a ↔ b) : b → a :=
elim (assume H₁ H₂, H₂) H
definition mp' := @elim_right
definition refl (a : Prop) : a ↔ a :=
intro (assume H, H) (assume H, H)
definition rfl {a : Prop} : a ↔ a :=
refl a
theorem trans (H₁ : a ↔ b) (H₂ : b ↔ c) : a ↔ c :=
intro
(assume Ha, elim_left H₂ (elim_left H₁ Ha))
(assume Hc, elim_right H₁ (elim_right H₂ Hc))
theorem symm (H : a ↔ b) : b ↔ a :=
intro
(assume Hb, elim_right H Hb)
(assume Ha, elim_left H Ha)
open eq.ops
theorem of_eq {a b : Prop} (H : a = b) : a ↔ b :=
iff.intro (λ Ha, H ▸ Ha) (λ Hb, H⁻¹ ▸ Hb)
end iff
definition not_iff_not_of_iff (H₁ : a ↔ b) : ¬a ↔ ¬b :=
iff.intro
(assume (Hna : ¬ a) (Hb : b), absurd (iff.elim_right H₁ Hb) Hna)
(assume (Hnb : ¬ b) (Ha : a), absurd (iff.elim_left H₁ Ha) Hnb)
theorem of_iff_true (H : a ↔ true) : a :=
iff.mp (iff.symm H) trivial
theorem not_of_iff_false (H : a ↔ false) : ¬a :=
assume Ha : a, iff.mp H Ha
theorem iff_true_intro (H : a) : a ↔ true :=
iff.intro
(λ Hl, trivial)
(λ Hr, H)
theorem iff_false_intro (H : ¬a) : a ↔ false :=
iff.intro
(λ Hl, absurd Hl H)
(λ Hr, false.rec _ Hr)
theorem not_non_contradictory_iff_absurd (a : Prop) : ¬¬¬a ↔ ¬a :=
iff.intro
(assume Hl : ¬¬¬a,
assume Ha : a, absurd (non_contradictory_intro Ha) Hl)
(assume Hr : ¬a,
assume Hnna : ¬¬a, absurd Hr Hnna)
calc_refl iff.refl
calc_trans iff.trans
inductive Exists {A : Type} (P : A → Prop) : Prop :=
intro : ∀ (a : A), P a → Exists P
definition exists.intro := @Exists.intro
notation `exists` binders `,` r:(scoped P, Exists P) := r
notation `∃` binders `,` r:(scoped P, Exists P) := r
theorem exists.elim {A : Type} {p : A → Prop} {B : Prop} (H1 : ∃x, p x) (H2 : ∀ (a : A) (H : p a), B) : B :=
Exists.rec H2 H1
/- decidable -/
inductive decidable [class] (p : Prop) : Type :=
| inl : p → decidable p
| inr : ¬p → decidable p
definition decidable_true [instance] : decidable true :=
decidable.inl trivial
definition decidable_false [instance] : decidable false :=
decidable.inr not_false
namespace decidable
variables {p q : Prop}
definition rec_on_true [H : decidable p] {H1 : p → Type} {H2 : ¬p → Type} (H3 : p) (H4 : H1 H3)
: decidable.rec_on H H1 H2 :=
decidable.rec_on H (λh, H4) (λh, !false.rec (h H3))
definition rec_on_false [H : decidable p] {H1 : p → Type} {H2 : ¬p → Type} (H3 : ¬p) (H4 : H2 H3)
: decidable.rec_on H H1 H2 :=
decidable.rec_on H (λh, false.rec _ (H3 h)) (λh, H4)
definition by_cases {q : Type} [C : decidable p] (Hpq : p → q) (Hnpq : ¬p → q) : q :=
decidable.rec_on C (assume Hp, Hpq Hp) (assume Hnp, Hnpq Hnp)
theorem em (p : Prop) [H : decidable p] : p ∨ ¬p :=
by_cases (λ Hp, or.inl Hp) (λ Hnp, or.inr Hnp)
theorem by_contradiction [Hp : decidable p] (H : ¬p → false) : p :=
by_cases
(assume H1 : p, H1)
(assume H1 : ¬p, false.rec _ (H H1))
end decidable
section
variables {p q : Prop}
open decidable
definition decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (Hp : decidable p) (H : p ↔ q) : decidable q :=
decidable.rec_on Hp
(assume Hp : p, inl (iff.elim_left H Hp))
(assume Hnp : ¬p, inr (iff.elim_left (not_iff_not_of_iff H) Hnp))
definition decidable_of_decidable_of_eq (Hp : decidable p) (H : p = q) : decidable q :=
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff Hp (iff.of_eq H)
end
section
variables {p q : Prop}
open decidable (rec_on inl inr)
definition decidable_and [instance] [Hp : decidable p] [Hq : decidable q] : decidable (p ∧ q) :=
rec_on Hp
(assume Hp : p, rec_on Hq
(assume Hq : q, inl (and.intro Hp Hq))
(assume Hnq : ¬q, inr (assume H : p ∧ q, and.rec_on H (assume Hp Hq, absurd Hq Hnq))))
(assume Hnp : ¬p, inr (assume H : p ∧ q, and.rec_on H (assume Hp Hq, absurd Hp Hnp)))
definition decidable_or [instance] [Hp : decidable p] [Hq : decidable q] : decidable (p ∨ q) :=
rec_on Hp
(assume Hp : p, inl (or.inl Hp))
(assume Hnp : ¬p, rec_on Hq
(assume Hq : q, inl (or.inr Hq))
(assume Hnq : ¬q, inr (assume H : p ∨ q, or.elim H (assume Hp, absurd Hp Hnp) (assume Hq, absurd Hq Hnq))))
definition decidable_not [instance] [Hp : decidable p] : decidable (¬p) :=
rec_on Hp
(assume Hp, inr (λ Hnp, absurd Hp Hnp))
(assume Hnp, inl Hnp)
definition decidable_implies [instance] [Hp : decidable p] [Hq : decidable q] : decidable (p → q) :=
rec_on Hp
(assume Hp : p, rec_on Hq
(assume Hq : q, inl (assume H, Hq))
(assume Hnq : ¬q, inr (assume H : p → q, absurd (H Hp) Hnq)))
(assume Hnp : ¬p, inl (assume Hp, absurd Hp Hnp))
definition decidable_iff [instance] [Hp : decidable p] [Hq : decidable q] : decidable (p ↔ q) :=
show decidable ((p → q) ∧ (q → p)), from _
end
definition decidable_pred [reducible] {A : Type} (R : A → Prop) := Π (a : A), decidable (R a)
definition decidable_rel [reducible] {A : Type} (R : A → A → Prop) := Π (a b : A), decidable (R a b)
definition decidable_eq [reducible] (A : Type) := decidable_rel (@eq A)
definition decidable_ne [instance] {A : Type} [H : decidable_eq A] : Π (a b : A), decidable (a ≠ b) :=
show Π x y : A, decidable (x = y → false), from _
namespace bool
definition ff_ne_tt : ff = tt → false
| [none]
end bool
open bool
definition is_dec_eq {A : Type} (p : A → A → bool) : Prop := ∀ ⦃x y : A⦄, p x y = tt → x = y
definition is_dec_refl {A : Type} (p : A → A → bool) : Prop := ∀x, p x x = tt
open decidable
protected definition bool.has_decidable_eq [instance] : ∀a b : bool, decidable (a = b)
| ff ff := inl rfl
| ff tt := inr ff_ne_tt
| tt ff := inr (ne.symm ff_ne_tt)
| tt tt := inl rfl
definition decidable_eq_of_bool_pred {A : Type} {p : A → A → bool} (H₁ : is_dec_eq p) (H₂ : is_dec_refl p) : decidable_eq A :=
take x y : A, by_cases
(assume Hp : p x y = tt, inl (H₁ Hp))
(assume Hn : ¬ p x y = tt, inr (assume Hxy : x = y, absurd (H₂ y) (eq.rec_on Hxy Hn)))
theorem decidable_eq_inl_refl {A : Type} [H : decidable_eq A] (a : A) : H a a = inl (eq.refl a) :=
match H a a with
| inl e := rfl
| inr n := absurd rfl n
end
open eq.ops
theorem decidable_eq_inr_neg {A : Type} [H : decidable_eq A] {a b : A} : Π n : a ≠ b, H a b = inr n :=
assume n,
match H a b with
| inl e := absurd e n
| inr n₁ := proof_irrel n n₁ ▸ rfl
end
/- inhabited -/
inductive inhabited [class] (A : Type) : Type :=
mk : A → inhabited A
protected definition inhabited.value {A : Type} (h : inhabited A) : A :=
inhabited.rec (λa, a) h
protected definition inhabited.destruct {A : Type} {B : Type} (H1 : inhabited A) (H2 : A → B) : B :=
inhabited.rec H2 H1
definition default (A : Type) [H : inhabited A] : A :=
inhabited.rec (λa, a) H
opaque definition arbitrary (A : Type) [H : inhabited A] : A :=
inhabited.rec (λa, a) H
definition Prop.is_inhabited [instance] : inhabited Prop :=
inhabited.mk true
definition inhabited_fun [instance] (A : Type) {B : Type} [H : inhabited B] : inhabited (A → B) :=
inhabited.rec_on H (λb, inhabited.mk (λa, b))
definition inhabited_Pi [instance] (A : Type) {B : A → Type} [H : Πx, inhabited (B x)] :
inhabited (Πx, B x) :=
inhabited.mk (λa, inhabited.rec_on (H a) (λb, b))
protected definition bool.is_inhabited [instance] : inhabited bool :=
inhabited.mk ff
inductive nonempty [class] (A : Type) : Prop :=
intro : A → nonempty A
protected definition nonempty.elim {A : Type} {B : Prop} (H1 : nonempty A) (H2 : A → B) : B :=
nonempty.rec H2 H1
theorem nonempty_of_inhabited [instance] {A : Type} [H : inhabited A] : nonempty A :=
nonempty.intro (default A)
/- subsingleton -/
inductive subsingleton [class] (A : Type) : Prop :=
intro : (∀ a b : A, a = b) → subsingleton A
protected definition subsingleton.elim {A : Type} [H : subsingleton A] : ∀(a b : A), a = b :=
subsingleton.rec (fun p, p) H
definition subsingleton_prop [instance] (p : Prop) : subsingleton p :=
subsingleton.intro (λa b, !proof_irrel)
definition subsingleton_decidable [instance] (p : Prop) : subsingleton (decidable p) :=
subsingleton.intro (λ d₁,
match d₁ with
| inl t₁ := (λ d₂,
match d₂ with
| inl t₂ := eq.rec_on (proof_irrel t₁ t₂) rfl
| inr f₂ := absurd t₁ f₂
end)
| inr f₁ := (λ d₂,
match d₂ with
| inl t₂ := absurd t₂ f₁
| inr f₂ := eq.rec_on (proof_irrel f₁ f₂) rfl
end)
end)
protected theorem rec_subsingleton {p : Prop} [H : decidable p]
{H1 : p → Type} {H2 : ¬p → Type}
[H3 : Π(h : p), subsingleton (H1 h)] [H4 : Π(h : ¬p), subsingleton (H2 h)]
: subsingleton (decidable.rec_on H H1 H2) :=
decidable.rec_on H (λh, H3 h) (λh, H4 h) --this can be proven using dependent version of "by_cases"
/- if-then-else -/
definition ite (c : Prop) [H : decidable c] {A : Type} (t e : A) : A :=
decidable.rec_on H (λ Hc, t) (λ Hnc, e)
definition if_pos {c : Prop} [H : decidable c] (Hc : c) {A : Type} {t e : A} : (if c then t else e) = t :=
decidable.rec
(λ Hc : c, eq.refl (@ite c (decidable.inl Hc) A t e))
(λ Hnc : ¬c, absurd Hc Hnc)
H
definition if_neg {c : Prop} [H : decidable c] (Hnc : ¬c) {A : Type} {t e : A} : (if c then t else e) = e :=
decidable.rec
(λ Hc : c, absurd Hc Hnc)
(λ Hnc : ¬c, eq.refl (@ite c (decidable.inr Hnc) A t e))
H
definition if_t_t (c : Prop) [H : decidable c] {A : Type} (t : A) : (if c then t else t) = t :=
decidable.rec
(λ Hc : c, eq.refl (@ite c (decidable.inl Hc) A t t))
(λ Hnc : ¬c, eq.refl (@ite c (decidable.inr Hnc) A t t))
H
-- We use "dependent" if-then-else to be able to communicate the if-then-else condition
-- to the branches
definition dite (c : Prop) [H : decidable c] {A : Type} (t : c → A) (e : ¬ c → A) : A :=
decidable.rec_on H (λ Hc, t Hc) (λ Hnc, e Hnc)
definition dif_pos {c : Prop} [H : decidable c] (Hc : c) {A : Type} {t : c → A} {e : ¬ c → A} : (if H : c then t H else e H) = t Hc :=
decidable.rec
(λ Hc : c, eq.refl (@dite c (decidable.inl Hc) A t e))
(λ Hnc : ¬c, absurd Hc Hnc)
H
definition dif_neg {c : Prop} [H : decidable c] (Hnc : ¬c) {A : Type} {t : c → A} {e : ¬ c → A} : (if H : c then t H else e H) = e Hnc :=
decidable.rec
(λ Hc : c, absurd Hc Hnc)
(λ Hnc : ¬c, eq.refl (@dite c (decidable.inr Hnc) A t e))
H
-- Remark: dite and ite are "definitionally equal" when we ignore the proofs.
theorem dite_ite_eq (c : Prop) [H : decidable c] {A : Type} (t : A) (e : A) : dite c (λh, t) (λh, e) = ite c t e :=
rfl
definition is_true (c : Prop) [H : decidable c] : Prop :=
if c then true else false
definition is_false (c : Prop) [H : decidable c] : Prop :=
if c then false else true
theorem of_is_true {c : Prop} [H₁ : decidable c] (H₂ : is_true c) : c :=
decidable.rec_on H₁ (λ Hc, Hc) (λ Hnc, !false.rec (if_neg Hnc ▸ H₂))
notation `dec_trivial` := of_is_true trivial
theorem not_of_not_is_true {c : Prop} [H₁ : decidable c] (H₂ : ¬ is_true c) : ¬ c :=
decidable.rec_on H₁ (λ Hc, absurd true.intro (if_pos Hc ▸ H₂)) (λ Hnc, Hnc)
theorem not_of_is_false {c : Prop} [H₁ : decidable c] (H₂ : is_false c) : ¬ c :=
decidable.rec_on H₁ (λ Hc, !false.rec (if_pos Hc ▸ H₂)) (λ Hnc, Hnc)
theorem of_not_is_false {c : Prop} [H₁ : decidable c] (H₂ : ¬ is_false c) : c :=
decidable.rec_on H₁ (λ Hc, Hc) (λ Hnc, absurd true.intro (if_neg Hnc ▸ H₂))
|
088b1dbf4fdc9ddc46623e106e8e2b8711f03168 | 94ec458bb9c7783744397f9a68d867bd7a765e18 | /src/construction.lean | 5875bcdbe78ce0b50f9ca8a173d5e3478170418a | [] | no_license | myuon/lean-cate | b8fcfd7965a348155152b3fc7d5041b356721945 | 9e71e61c2a09d64b17ab3145ff6dde564387950a | refs/heads/master | 1,611,236,436,038 | 1,462,408,916,000 | 1,462,408,916,000 | 47,414,605 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,905 | lean | import category
open category functor natrans
open eq eq.ops
open prod
section product
lemma prod_subst {a a' b b' : Type} (H₁ : a = a') (H₂ : b = b')
: (a,b) = (a',b') := H₁ ▸ rfl ⬝ H₂ ▸ rfl
definition prod_category (C D : category) : category := category.mk
((@obj C) × (@obj D))
(λa b, (@hom C (pr₁ a) (pr₁ b)) × (@hom D (pr₂ a) (pr₂ b)))
(λa, (@id C (pr₁ a), @id D (pr₂ a)))
(λa b c f g, (pr₁ f ∘[C] pr₁ g, pr₂ f ∘[D] pr₂ g))
(λa b c d f g h, (@assoc C _ _ _ _ _ _ _) ▸ rfl ⬝ (@assoc D _ _ _ _ _ _ _) ▸ rfl ⬝ rfl)
(λa b f, prod.cases_on f (λf₁ f₂, (@id_left C _ _ _) ▸ rfl ⬝ (@id_left D _ _ _) ▸ rfl ⬝ rfl))
(λa b f, prod.cases_on f (λf₁ f₂, (@id_right C _ _ _) ▸ rfl ⬝ (@id_right D _ _ _) ▸ rfl ⬝ rfl))
notation C `×c` D := prod_category C D
definition sigma_unique {A : Type} (B : A → Prop) : Type
:= Σ x, B x ∧ ∀y, B y → y = x
notation `Σ!` binders `, ` r:(scoped P, sigma_unique P) := r
structure product {C : category} (a b : @obj C) :=
(prod : @obj C)
(proj : @hom (C ×c C) (prod,prod) (a,b))
(universality : ∀ q, ∀ (f : @hom (C ×c C) (q,q) (a,b)), Σ! (h : @hom C q prod), (pr₁ proj ∘[C] h = pr₁ f) ∧ (pr₂ proj ∘[C] h = pr₂ f))
definition product.mediating {C : category} {a b : @obj C} (p : @product C a b) {q : @obj C} (f : hom q a) (g : hom q b) : @hom C q (product.prod p)
:= sigma.pr1 (product.universality p q (f,g))
notation `product⟨` f `, ` g `⟩` := product.mediating _ f g
end product
section bifunctor
definition bifunctor (C D E : category) := functor (C ×c D) E
variables {C D E : category}
definition bifunctor.left_obj (F : bifunctor C D E) (r : @obj C) : functor D E :=
functor.mk
(λx, fobj F (r,x))
(λa b f, fmap F (@category.id C _,f))
(λa, preserve_id F)
(λa b c g f, calc
fmap F (@category.id C _, g ∘[D] f) = fmap F (@category.id C _ ∘[C] @category.id C _, g ∘[D] f) : @id_left C _ _ _ ▸ rfl
... = (fmap F (@category.id C _, g) ∘[E] fmap F (@category.id C _, f)) : preserve_comp F)
definition bifunctor.right_obj (F : bifunctor C D E) (r : @obj D) : functor C E :=
functor.mk
(λx, fobj F (x,r))
(λa b f, fmap F (f,@category.id D _))
(λa, preserve_id F)
(λa b c g f, calc
fmap F (g ∘[C] f,@category.id D _) = fmap F (g ∘[C] f,@category.id D _ ∘[D] @category.id D _) : @id_left D _ _ _ ▸ rfl
... = (fmap F (g,@category.id D _) ∘[E] fmap F (f,@category.id D _)) : preserve_comp F)
notation F `f[` a ` ,` `-]` := bifunctor.left_obj F a
notation F `f[-` ` ,` a `]` := bifunctor.right_obj F a
definition bifunctor.left_map (F : bifunctor C D E) {a b : @obj C} (f : @hom C a b) : (F f[a,-]) ⇒ (F f[b,-]) :=
natrans.mk
(λx, fmap (F f[-,x]) f)
(λc d g, calc
(fmap (F f[-,d]) f ∘[E] fmap (F f[a,-]) g) = (fmap F (f,@category.id D _) ∘[E] fmap F (@category.id C _,g)) : rfl
... = fmap F ((f ∘[C] @category.id C _),(@category.id D _ ∘[D] g)) : preserve_comp F
... = fmap F (f,(@category.id D _ ∘[D] g)) : @id_right C _ _ _ ▸ rfl
... = fmap F (f,g) : @id_left D _ _ _ ▸ rfl
... = fmap F (@category.id C _ ∘[C] f,g) : (@id_left C _ _ _ ▸ rfl)⁻¹
... = fmap F (@category.id C _ ∘[C] f,g ∘[D] @category.id D _) : (@id_right D _ _ _ ▸ rfl)⁻¹
... = (fmap F (@category.id C _,g) ∘[E] fmap F (f,@category.id D _)) : preserve_comp F
... = (fmap (F f[b,-]) g ∘[E] fmap (F f[-,c]) f) : rfl)
definition bifunctor.right_map (F : bifunctor C D E) {a b : @obj D} (f : @hom D a b) : (F f[-,a]) ⇒ (F f[-,b]) :=
natrans.mk
(λx, fmap (F f[x,-]) f)
(λc d g, calc
(fmap (F f[d,-]) f ∘[E] fmap (F f[-,a]) g) = (fmap F (@category.id C _,f) ∘[E] fmap F (g,@category.id D _)) : rfl
... = fmap F ((@category.id C _ ∘[C] g),(f ∘[D] @category.id D _)) : preserve_comp F
... = fmap F ((@category.id C _ ∘[C] g),f) : @id_right D _ _ _ ▸ rfl
... = fmap F (g,f) : (@id_left C _ _ _ ▸ rfl)⁻¹
... = fmap F ((g ∘[C] @category.id C _),f) : (@id_right C _ _ _ ▸ rfl)⁻¹
... = fmap F ((g ∘[C] @category.id C _),(@category.id D _ ∘[D] f)) : (@id_left D _ _ _ ▸ rfl)⁻¹
... = (fmap F (g,@category.id D _) ∘[E] fmap F (@category.id C _,f)) : preserve_comp F
... = (fmap (F f[-,b]) g ∘[E] fmap (F f[c,-]) f) : rfl)
notation F `n[` f ` ,` `-]` := bifunctor.left_map F f
notation F `n[-` ` ,` f `]` := bifunctor.right_map F f
definition binat.left {F G : bifunctor C D E} (η : F ⇒ G) (r : @obj C) : (F f[r,-]) ⇒ (G f[r,-]) :=
natrans.mk
(λx, (component η _))
(λa b f, calc
(component η (r,b) ∘[E] fmap (F f[r,-]) f) = (component η (r,b) ∘[E] fmap F (@category.id C _,f)) : rfl
... = (fmap G (@category.id C _,f) ∘[E] component η (r,a)) : naturality η
... = (fmap (G f[r,-]) f ∘[E] component η (r,a)) : rfl)
definition binat.right {F G : bifunctor C D E} (η : F ⇒ G) (r : @obj D) : (F f[-,r]) ⇒ (G f[-,r]) :=
natrans.mk
(λx, (component η _))
(λa b f, calc
(component η (b,r) ∘[E] fmap (F f[-,r]) f) = (component η (b,r) ∘[E] fmap F (f,@category.id D _)) : rfl
... = (fmap G (f,@category.id D _) ∘[E] component η (a,r)) : naturality η
... = (fmap (G f[-,r]) f ∘[E] component η (a,r)) : rfl)
end bifunctor
section homfunctor
definition homLF {C : category} (D : category) (F : functor C D) : functor (op C ×c D) Types :=
functor.mk
(λx, @hom D (fobj F (pr₁ x)) (pr₂ x))
(λa b f x, pr₂ f ∘[D] x ∘[D] fmap F (pr₁ f))
(λa, funext (λx, calc
((pr₂ (id _) ∘[D] x) ∘[D] fmap F (id _)) = ((pr₂ (id _) ∘[D] x) ∘[D] id _) : preserve_id F ▸ rfl
... = (pr₂ (@id (op C ×c D) _) ∘[D] x) : id_right
... = x : id_left
))
(λa b c g f, funext (λx, calc
(pr₂ (g ∘[(op C ×c D)] f) ∘[D] x ∘[D] fmap F (pr₁ (g ∘[(op C ×c D)] f))) = (pr₂ g ∘[D] pr₂ f ∘[D] x ∘[D] fmap F (pr₁ f ∘[C] pr₁ g)) : rfl
... = (((pr₂ g ∘[D] pr₂ f) ∘[D] x) ∘[D] (fmap F (pr₁ f) ∘[D] fmap F (pr₁ g))) : preserve_comp F ▸ rfl
... = ((pr₂ g ∘[D] (pr₂ f ∘[D] x)) ∘[D] (fmap F (pr₁ f) ∘[D] fmap F (pr₁ g))) : assoc ▸ rfl
... = (((pr₂ g ∘[D] (pr₂ f ∘[D] x)) ∘[D] fmap F (pr₁ f)) ∘[D] fmap F (pr₁ g)) : assoc ▸ rfl
... = (pr₂ g ∘[D] ((pr₂ f ∘[D] x) ∘[D] fmap F (pr₁ f)) ∘[D] fmap F (pr₁ g)) : assoc ▸ rfl
))
definition homRF {D : category} (C : category) (G : functor D C) : functor (op C ×c D) Types :=
functor.mk
(λx, @hom C (pr₁ x) (fobj G (pr₂ x)))
(λa b f x, fmap G (pr₂ f) ∘[C] x ∘[C] pr₁ f)
(λa, funext (λx, calc
(fmap G (id _) ∘[C] x ∘[C] id _) = ((id _ ∘[C] x) ∘[C] id _) : preserve_id G ▸ rfl
... = (id _ ∘[C] x) : id_right
... = x : id_left
))
(λa b c g f, funext (λx, calc
(fmap G (pr₂ g ∘[D] pr₂ f) ∘[C] x ∘[C] (pr₁ f ∘[C] pr₁ g)) = ((fmap G (pr₂ g) ∘[C] fmap G (pr₂ f)) ∘[C] x ∘[C] (pr₁ f ∘[C] pr₁ g)) : preserve_comp G ▸ rfl
... = ((((fmap G (pr₂ g) ∘[C] fmap G (pr₂ f)) ∘[C] x) ∘[C] pr₁ f) ∘[C] pr₁ g) : assoc ▸ rfl
... = (((fmap G (pr₂ g) ∘[C] (fmap G (pr₂ f) ∘[C] x)) ∘[C] pr₁ f) ∘[C] pr₁ g) : assoc ▸ rfl
... = ((fmap G (pr₂ g) ∘[C] ((fmap G (pr₂ f) ∘[C] x) ∘[C] pr₁ f)) ∘[C] pr₁ g) : assoc ▸ rfl))
notation `Hom[` D `][` F `-;-]` := homLF D F
notation `Hom[` C `][-;` G `-]` := homRF C G
end homfunctor
|
10f38c42594ecf90d0aa4982ddb4caa2d1c405fb | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /tests/lean/elab15.lean | e1cc828aa63abb180c37530b9c3ea9f900784e5c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 311 | lean | open tactic
set_option pp.notation false
universe variables u
#check
λ (A : Type u) (a b c d : A) (H₁ : a = b) (H₂ : c = b) (H₃ : d = c),
have a = c, by do { transitivity, assumption, symmetry, assumption },
show a = d, by do { transitivity, this ← get_local "this", exact this, symmetry, assumption }
|
d2b86b8db4d549c214e6b8daad90dc5e7fe21e2f | ece1fcd81204f318535500cde1f3c6433de98f46 | /src/for_mathlib/mv_polynomial.lean | b9a0cdeeb9cc0904e629b5f6039b1eecec8f28f1 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | stjordanis/M4P33 | ab5d90bda269428aee16885dbd33f0d21d7d2f79 | d3b56421fcb03b935d9012e5a5b35e1c1ad0b0b4 | refs/heads/master | 1,607,921,471,294 | 1,579,298,081,000 | 1,579,298,081,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 877 | lean | import data.mv_polynomial
namespace mv_polynomial
theorem eval_one {X : Type*} {R : Type*} [comm_semiring R]
(x : X → R) : eval x 1 = 1 := eval_C _
-- this must be done somewhere else because it's in polynomial namespace
theorem eval_pow {X : Type*} {R : Type*} [comm_semiring R]
(f : mv_polynomial X R) (m : ℕ) (x : X → R) :
eval x (f ^ m) = (eval x f)^m :=
begin
induction m with d hd,
rw pow_zero,
rw pow_zero,
rw eval_one,
rw pow_succ,
rw pow_succ,
rw eval_mul,
rw hd,
end
/-- Over an infinite integral domain a polynomial f is zero iff it
evaluates to zero everywhere -/
lemma mv_polynomial.eval_eq_zero {k : Type*} [integral_domain k] [infinite k]
{n : Type*} {f : mv_polynomial n k} :
(∀ x, eval x f = 0) ↔ f = 0 :=
begin
split, swap, intros hf x, rw [hf, eval_zero], -- easy direction
sorry
end
end mv_polynomial
|
9dd1a3ce69ddacdf228987148ad7907027bce423 | 3268ab3a126f0fef71459fbf170dc38efe5d0506 | /colimit/seq_colim.hlean | d1323084181df24410a7eb2032e20d450c4ab66e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | soraismus/Spectral | f043fed1a4e02ddfeba531769b2980eb817471f4 | 32512bf47db3a1b932856e7ed7c7830b1fc07ef0 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,628,705,579 | 1,538,609,948,000 | 1,538,609,974,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 40,549 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Egbert Rijke
-/
import hit.colimit .sequence cubical.squareover types.arrow types.equiv
cubical.pathover2
open eq nat sigma sigma.ops quotient equiv pi is_trunc is_equiv fiber function trunc
namespace seq_colim
-- note: this clashes with the abbreviation defined in namespace "colimit"
abbreviation ι [constructor] := @inclusion
abbreviation ι' [constructor] [parsing_only] {A} (f n) := @inclusion A f n
universe variable v
variables {A A' A'' : ℕ → Type} (f : seq_diagram A) (f' : seq_diagram A') (f'' : seq_diagram A'')
(τ τ₂ : Π⦃n⦄, A n → A' n) (p : Π⦃n⦄ (a : A n), τ (f a) = f' (τ a))
(p₂ : Π⦃n⦄ (a : A n), τ₂ (f a) = f' (τ₂ a))
(τ' : Π⦃n⦄, A' n → A'' n) (p' : Π⦃n⦄ (a' : A' n), τ' (f' a') = f'' (τ' a'))
{P : Π⦃n⦄, A n → Type.{v}} (g : seq_diagram_over f P) {n : ℕ} {a : A n}
definition lrep_glue {n m : ℕ} (H : n ≤ m) (a : A n) : ι f (lrep f H a) = ι f a :=
begin
induction H with m H p,
{ reflexivity },
{ exact glue f (lrep f H a) ⬝ p }
end
-- probably not needed
-- definition rep0_back_glue [is_equiseq f] (k : ℕ) (a : A k) : ι f (rep0_back f k a) = ι f a :=
-- begin
-- exact sorry
-- end
definition colim_back [unfold 4] [H : is_equiseq f] : seq_colim f → A 0 :=
begin
intro x,
induction x with k a k a,
{ exact lrep_back f (zero_le k) a},
rexact ap (lrep_back f (zero_le k)) (left_inv (@f k) a),
end
section
variable {f}
local attribute is_equiv_lrep [instance] --[priority 500]
definition is_equiv_inclusion0 (H : is_equiseq f) : is_equiv (ι' f 0) :=
begin
fapply adjointify,
{ exact colim_back f},
{ intro x, induction x with k a k a,
{ refine (lrep_glue f (zero_le k) (lrep_back f (zero_le k) a))⁻¹ ⬝ _,
exact ap (ι f) (right_inv (lrep f (zero_le k)) a)},
apply eq_pathover_id_right,
refine (ap_compose (ι f) (colim_back f) _) ⬝ph _,
refine ap02 _ _ ⬝ph _, rotate 1,
{ rexact elim_glue f _ _ a },
refine _ ⬝pv ((natural_square (lrep_glue f (zero_le k))
(ap (lrep_back f (zero_le k)) (left_inv (@f k) a)))⁻¹ʰ ⬝h _),
{ exact (glue f _)⁻¹ ⬝ ap (ι f) (right_inv (lrep f (zero_le (succ k))) (f a)) },
{ rewrite [-con.assoc, -con_inv] },
refine !ap_compose⁻¹ ⬝ ap_compose (ι f) _ _ ⬝ph _,
refine dconcat (aps (ι' f k) (natural_square (right_inv (lrep f (zero_le k)))
(left_inv (@f _) a))) _,
apply move_top_of_left, apply move_left_of_bot,
refine ap02 _ (whisker_left _ (adj (@f _) a)) ⬝pv _,
rewrite [-+ap_con, ap_compose', ap_id],
apply natural_square_tr },
{ intro a, reflexivity }
end
definition equiv_of_is_equiseq [constructor] (H : is_equiseq f) : seq_colim f ≃ A 0 :=
(equiv.mk _ (is_equiv_inclusion0 H))⁻¹ᵉ
variable (f)
end
section
definition rep_glue (k : ℕ) (a : A n) : ι f (rep f k a) = ι f a :=
begin
induction k with k IH,
{ reflexivity},
{ exact glue f (rep f k a) ⬝ IH}
end
/- functorial action and equivalences -/
section functor
variables {f f' f''}
include p
definition seq_colim_functor [unfold 7] : seq_colim f → seq_colim f' :=
begin
intro x, induction x with n a n a,
{ exact ι f' (τ a)},
{ exact ap (ι f') (p a) ⬝ glue f' (τ a)}
end
omit p
theorem seq_colim_functor_glue {n : ℕ} (a : A n)
: ap (seq_colim_functor τ p) (glue f a) = ap (ι f') (p a) ⬝ glue f' (τ a) :=
!elim_glue
definition seq_colim_functor_compose [constructor] (x : seq_colim f) :
seq_colim_functor (λn x, τ' (τ x)) (λn, hvconcat (@p n) (@p' n)) x =
seq_colim_functor τ' p' (seq_colim_functor τ p x) :=
begin
induction x, reflexivity,
apply eq_pathover, apply hdeg_square,
refine !seq_colim_functor_glue ⬝ _ ⬝ (ap_compose (seq_colim_functor _ _) _ _)⁻¹,
refine _ ⬝ (ap02 _ proof !seq_colim_functor_glue qed ⬝ !ap_con)⁻¹,
refine _ ⬝ (proof !ap_compose' ⬝ ap_compose (ι f'') _ _ qed ◾ proof !seq_colim_functor_glue qed)⁻¹,
exact whisker_right _ !ap_con ⬝ !con.assoc
end
variable (f)
definition seq_colim_functor_id [constructor] (x : seq_colim f) :
seq_colim_functor (λn, id) (λn, homotopy.rfl) x = x :=
begin
induction x, reflexivity,
apply eq_pathover, apply hdeg_square,
exact !seq_colim_functor_glue ⬝ !idp_con ⬝ !ap_id⁻¹,
end
variables {f τ τ₂ p p₂}
definition seq_colim_functor_homotopy [constructor] (q : τ ~2 τ₂)
(r : Π⦃n⦄ (a : A n), square (q (n+1) (f a)) (ap (@f' n) (q n a)) (p a) (p₂ a))
(x : seq_colim f) :
seq_colim_functor τ p x = seq_colim_functor τ₂ p₂ x :=
begin
induction x,
exact ap (ι f') (q n a),
apply eq_pathover,
refine !seq_colim_functor_glue ⬝ph _ ⬝hp !seq_colim_functor_glue⁻¹,
refine aps (ι f') (r a) ⬝v !ap_compose⁻¹ ⬝pv natural_square_tr (glue f') (q n a),
end
variables (τ τ₂ p p₂)
definition is_equiv_seq_colim_functor [constructor] [H : Πn, is_equiv (@τ n)]
: is_equiv (seq_colim_functor @τ p) :=
adjointify _ (seq_colim_functor (λn, (@τ _)⁻¹) (λn a, inv_commute' τ f f' p a))
abstract begin
intro x,
refine !seq_colim_functor_compose⁻¹ ⬝ seq_colim_functor_homotopy _ _ x ⬝ !seq_colim_functor_id,
{ intro n a, exact right_inv (@τ n) a },
{ intro n a,
refine whisker_right _ !ap_inv_commute' ⬝ !inv_con_cancel_right ⬝ whisker_left _ !ap_inv ⬝ph _,
apply whisker_bl, apply whisker_tl, exact ids }
end end
abstract begin
intro x,
refine !seq_colim_functor_compose⁻¹ ⬝ seq_colim_functor_homotopy _ _ x ⬝ !seq_colim_functor_id,
{ intro n a, exact left_inv (@τ n) a },
{ intro n a,
esimp [hvconcat],
refine whisker_left _ (!inv_commute'_fn ⬝ !con.assoc) ⬝ !con_inv_cancel_left ⬝ph _,
apply whisker_bl, apply whisker_tl, exact ids }
end end
definition seq_colim_equiv [constructor] (τ : Π{n}, A n ≃ A' n)
(p : Π⦃n⦄ (a : A n), τ (f a) = f' (τ a)) : seq_colim f ≃ seq_colim f' :=
equiv.mk _ (is_equiv_seq_colim_functor @τ p)
definition seq_colim_rec_unc [unfold 4] {P : seq_colim f → Type}
(v : Σ(Pincl : Π ⦃n : ℕ⦄ (a : A n), P (ι f a)),
Π ⦃n : ℕ⦄ (a : A n), Pincl (f a) =[glue f a] Pincl a)
: Π(x : seq_colim f), P x :=
by induction v with Pincl Pglue; exact seq_colim.rec f Pincl Pglue
definition is_equiv_seq_colim_rec (P : seq_colim f → Type) :
is_equiv (seq_colim_rec_unc :
(Σ(Pincl : Π ⦃n : ℕ⦄ (a : A n), P (ι f a)),
Π ⦃n : ℕ⦄ (a : A n), Pincl (f a) =[glue f a] Pincl a)
→ (Π (aa : seq_colim f), P aa)) :=
begin
fapply adjointify,
{ intro s, exact ⟨λn a, s (ι f a), λn a, apd s (glue f a)⟩},
{ intro s, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro x, induction x,
{ reflexivity},
{ apply eq_pathover_dep, esimp, apply hdeg_squareover, apply rec_glue}},
{ intro v, induction v with Pincl Pglue, fapply ap (sigma.mk _),
apply eq_of_homotopy2, intros n a, apply rec_glue},
end
/- universal property -/
definition equiv_seq_colim_rec (P : seq_colim f → Type) :
(Σ(Pincl : Π ⦃n : ℕ⦄ (a : A n), P (ι f a)),
Π ⦃n : ℕ⦄ (a : A n), Pincl (f a) =[glue f a] Pincl a) ≃ (Π (aa : seq_colim f), P aa) :=
equiv.mk _ !is_equiv_seq_colim_rec
end functor
definition shift_up [unfold 3] (x : seq_colim f) : seq_colim (shift_diag f) :=
begin
induction x,
{ exact ι' (shift_diag f) n (f a)},
{ exact glue (shift_diag f) (f a)}
end
definition shift_down [unfold 3] (x : seq_colim (shift_diag f)) : seq_colim f :=
begin
induction x,
{ exact ι' f (n+1) a},
{ exact glue f a}
end
-- definition kshift_up' (k : ℕ) (x : seq_colim f) : seq_colim (kshift_diag' f k) :=
-- begin
-- induction x,
-- { apply ι' _ n, exact rep f k a},
-- { exact sorry}
-- end
-- definition kshift_down' (k : ℕ) (x : seq_colim (kshift_diag' f k)) : seq_colim f :=
-- begin
-- induction x,
-- { exact ι f a},
-- { esimp, exact sorry}
-- end
end
definition shift_equiv [constructor] : seq_colim f ≃ seq_colim (shift_diag f) :=
equiv.MK (shift_up f)
(shift_down f)
abstract begin
intro x, induction x,
{ exact glue _ a },
{ apply eq_pathover,
rewrite [▸*, ap_id, ap_compose (shift_up f) (shift_down f), ↑shift_down,
elim_glue],
apply square_of_eq, apply whisker_right, exact !elim_glue⁻¹ }
end end
abstract begin
intro x, induction x,
{ exact glue _ a },
{ apply eq_pathover,
rewrite [▸*, ap_id, ap_compose (shift_down f) (shift_up f), ↑shift_up,
elim_glue],
apply square_of_eq, apply whisker_right, exact !elim_glue⁻¹ }
end end
-- definition kshift_equiv [constructor] (k : ℕ)
-- : seq_colim A ≃ @seq_colim (λn, A (k + n)) (kshift_diag A k) :=
-- equiv.MK (kshift_up k)
-- (kshift_down k)
-- abstract begin
-- intro a, exact sorry,
-- -- induction a,
-- -- { esimp, exact glue a},
-- -- { apply eq_pathover,
-- -- rewrite [▸*, ap_id, ap_compose shift_up shift_down, ↑shift_down,
-- -- @elim_glue (λk, A (succ k)) _, ↑shift_up],
-- -- apply square_of_eq, apply whisker_right, exact !elim_glue⁻¹}
-- end end
-- abstract begin
-- intro a, exact sorry
-- -- induction a,
-- -- { exact glue a},
-- -- { apply eq_pathover,
-- -- rewrite [▸*, ap_id, ap_compose shift_down shift_up, ↑shift_up,
-- -- @elim_glue A _, ↑shift_down],
-- -- apply square_of_eq, apply whisker_right, exact !elim_glue⁻¹}
-- end end
-- definition kshift_equiv' [constructor] (k : ℕ) : seq_colim f ≃ seq_colim (kshift_diag' f k) :=
-- equiv.MK (kshift_up' f k)
-- (kshift_down' f k)
-- abstract begin
-- intro a, exact sorry,
-- -- induction a,
-- -- { esimp, exact glue a},
-- -- { apply eq_pathover,
-- -- rewrite [▸*, ap_id, ap_compose shift_up shift_down, ↑shift_down,
-- -- @elim_glue (λk, A (succ k)) _, ↑shift_up],
-- -- apply square_of_eq, apply whisker_right, exact !elim_glue⁻¹}
-- end end
-- abstract begin
-- intro a, exact sorry
-- -- induction a,
-- -- { exact glue a},
-- -- { apply eq_pathover,
-- -- rewrite [▸*, ap_id, ap_compose shift_down shift_up, ↑shift_up,
-- -- @elim_glue A _, ↑shift_down],
-- -- apply square_of_eq, apply whisker_right, exact !elim_glue⁻¹}
-- end end
/- todo: define functions back and forth explicitly -/
definition kshift'_equiv (k : ℕ) : seq_colim f ≃ seq_colim (kshift_diag' f k) :=
begin
induction k with k IH,
{ reflexivity },
{ exact IH ⬝e shift_equiv (kshift_diag' f k) ⬝e
seq_colim_equiv (λn, equiv_ap A (succ_add n k))
(λn a, proof !tr_inv_tr ⬝ !transport_lemma⁻¹ qed) }
end
definition kshift_equiv_inv (k : ℕ) : seq_colim (kshift_diag f k) ≃ seq_colim f :=
begin
induction k with k IH,
{ exact seq_colim_equiv (λn, equiv_ap A (nat.zero_add n)) (λn a, !transport_lemma2) },
{ exact seq_colim_equiv (λn, equiv_ap A (succ_add k n))
(λn a, transport_lemma2 (succ_add k n) f a) ⬝e
(shift_equiv (kshift_diag f k))⁻¹ᵉ ⬝e IH }
end
definition kshift_equiv [constructor] (k : ℕ) : seq_colim f ≃ seq_colim (kshift_diag f k) :=
(kshift_equiv_inv f k)⁻¹ᵉ
-- definition kshift_equiv2 [constructor] (k : ℕ) : seq_colim f ≃ seq_colim (kshift_diag f k) :=
-- begin
-- refine equiv_change_fun (kshift_equiv f k) _,
-- end
variable {f}
definition seq_colim_constant_seq [constructor] (X : Type) : seq_colim (constant_seq X) ≃ X :=
equiv_of_is_equiseq (λn, !is_equiv_id)
variable (f)
definition is_contr_seq_colim {A : ℕ → Type} (f : seq_diagram A)
[Πk, is_contr (A k)] : is_contr (seq_colim f) :=
begin
refine is_contr_is_equiv_closed (ι' f 0) _ _,
apply is_equiv_inclusion0, intro n, exact is_equiv_of_is_contr _ _ _
end
definition seq_colim_equiv_of_is_equiv [constructor] {n : ℕ} (H : Πk, k ≥ n → is_equiv (@f k)) :
seq_colim f ≃ A n :=
kshift_equiv f n ⬝e equiv_of_is_equiseq (λk, H (n+k) !le_add_right)
/- colimits of dependent sequences, sigma's commute with colimits -/
section over
variable {f}
definition rep_f_equiv_natural {k : ℕ} (p : P (rep f k (f a))) :
transporto P (rep_f f (succ k) a) (g p) = g (transporto P (rep_f f k a) p) :=
(fn_tro_eq_tro_fn2 (rep_f f k a) g p)⁻¹
variable (a)
definition over_f_equiv [constructor] :
seq_colim (seq_diagram_of_over g (f a)) ≃ seq_colim (shift_diag (seq_diagram_of_over g a)) :=
seq_colim_equiv (rep_f_equiv f P a) (λk p, rep_f_equiv_natural g p)
definition seq_colim_over_equiv :
seq_colim (seq_diagram_of_over g (f a)) ≃ seq_colim (seq_diagram_of_over g a) :=
over_f_equiv g a ⬝e (shift_equiv (seq_diagram_of_over g a))⁻¹ᵉ
definition seq_colim_over_equiv_glue {k : ℕ} (x : P (rep f k (f a))) :
ap (seq_colim_over_equiv g a) (glue (seq_diagram_of_over g (f a)) x) =
ap (ι' (seq_diagram_of_over g a) (k+2)) (rep_f_equiv_natural g x) ⬝
glue (seq_diagram_of_over g a) (rep_f f k a ▸o x) :=
begin
refine ap_compose (shift_down (seq_diagram_of_over g a)) _ _ ⬝ _,
exact ap02 _ !elim_glue ⬝ !ap_con ⬝ !ap_compose' ◾ !elim_glue
end
variable {a}
include g
definition seq_colim_over [unfold 5] (x : seq_colim f) : Type.{v} :=
begin
refine seq_colim.elim_type f _ _ x,
{ intro n a, exact seq_colim (seq_diagram_of_over g a)},
{ intro n a, exact seq_colim_over_equiv g a }
end
omit g
definition ιo [constructor] (p : P a) : seq_colim_over g (ι f a) :=
ι' _ 0 p
-- Warning: the order of addition has changed in rep_rep
-- definition rep_equiv_rep_rep (l : ℕ)
-- : @seq_colim (λk, P (rep (k + l) a)) (kshift_diag' _ _) ≃
-- @seq_colim (λk, P (rep k (rep l a))) (seq_diagram_of_over P (rep l a)) :=
-- seq_colim_equiv (λk, rep_rep_equiv P a k l) abstract (λk p,
-- begin
-- esimp,
-- rewrite [+cast_apd011],
-- refine _ ⬝ (fn_tro_eq_tro_fn (rep_f k a)⁻¹ᵒ g p)⁻¹ᵖ,
-- rewrite [↑rep_f,↓rep_f k a],
-- refine !pathover_ap_invo_tro ⬝ _,
-- rewrite [apo_invo,apo_tro]
-- end) end
variable {P}
theorem seq_colim_over_glue /- r -/ (x : seq_colim_over g (ι f (f a)))
: transport (seq_colim_over g) (glue f a) x = shift_down _ (over_f_equiv g a x) :=
ap10 (elim_type_glue _ _ _ a) x
theorem seq_colim_over_glue_inv (x : seq_colim_over g (ι f a))
: transport (seq_colim_over g) (glue f a)⁻¹ x = to_inv (over_f_equiv g a) (shift_up _ x) :=
ap10 (elim_type_glue_inv _ _ _ a) x
definition glue_over (p : P (f a)) : pathover (seq_colim_over g) (ιo g p) (glue f a) (ι' _ 1 p) :=
pathover_of_tr_eq !seq_colim_over_glue
-- we can define a function from the colimit of total spaces to the total space of the colimit.
/- TO DO: define glue' in the same way as glue' -/
definition glue' (p : P a) : ⟨ι f (f a), ιo g (g p)⟩ = ⟨ι f a, ιo g p⟩ :=
sigma_eq (glue f a) (glue_over g (g p) ⬝op glue (seq_diagram_of_over g a) p)
definition glue_star (k : ℕ) (x : P (rep f k (f a))) :
⟨ι f (f a), ι (seq_diagram_of_over g (f a)) x⟩ =
⟨ι f a, ι (seq_diagram_of_over g a) (to_fun (rep_f_equiv f P a k) x)⟩
:> sigma (seq_colim_over g) :=
begin
apply dpair_eq_dpair (glue f a),
apply pathover_of_tr_eq,
refine seq_colim_over_glue g (ι (seq_diagram_of_over g (f a)) x)
end
definition sigma_colim_of_colim_sigma [unfold 5] (a : seq_colim (seq_diagram_sigma g)) :
Σ(x : seq_colim f), seq_colim_over g x :=
begin
induction a with n v n v,
{ induction v with a p, exact ⟨ι f a, ιo g p⟩},
{ induction v with a p, exact glue' g p }
end
definition colim_sigma_triangle [unfold 5] (a : seq_colim (seq_diagram_sigma g)) :
(sigma_colim_of_colim_sigma g a).1 = seq_colim_functor (λn, sigma.pr1) (λn, homotopy.rfl) a :=
begin
induction a with n v n v,
{ induction v with a p, reflexivity },
{ induction v with a p, apply eq_pathover, apply hdeg_square,
refine ap_compose sigma.pr1 _ _ ⬝ ap02 _ !elim_glue ⬝ _ ⬝ !elim_glue⁻¹,
exact !sigma_eq_pr1 ⬝ !idp_con⁻¹ }
end
-- we now want to show that this function is an equivalence.
/-
Kristina's proof of the induction principle of colim-sigma for sigma-colim.
It's a double induction, so we have 4 cases: point-point, point-path, path-point and path-path.
The main idea of the proof is that for the path-path case you need to fill a square, but we can
define the point-path case as a filler for this square.
-/
open sigma
/-
dictionary:
Kristina | Lean
VARIABLE NAMES (A, P, k, n, e, w are the same)
x : A_n | a : A n
a : A_n → A_{n+1} | f : A n → A (n+1)
y : P(n, x) | x : P a (maybe other variables)
f : P(n, x) → P(n+1, a_n x) | g : P a → P (f a)
DEFINITION NAMES
κ | glue
U | rep_f_equiv : P (n+1+k, rep f k (f x)) ≃ P (n+k+1, rep f (k+1) x)
δ | rep_f_equiv_natural
F | over_f_equiv g a ⬝e (shift_equiv (λk, P (rep f k a)) (seq_diagram_of_over g a))⁻¹ᵉ
g_* | g_star
g | sigma_colim_rec_point
-/
definition glue_star_eq (k : ℕ) (x : P (rep f k (f a))) :
glue_star g k x =
dpair_eq_dpair (glue f a) (pathover_tr (glue f a) (ι (seq_diagram_of_over g (f a)) x)) ⬝
ap (dpair (ι f a)) (seq_colim_over_glue g (ι (seq_diagram_of_over g (f a)) x)) :=
ap (sigma_eq _) !pathover_of_tr_eq_eq_concato ⬝ !sigma_eq_con ⬝ whisker_left _ !ap_dpair⁻¹
definition g_star_step {E : (Σ(x : seq_colim f), seq_colim_over g x) → Type}
(e : Πn (a : A n) (x : P a), E ⟨ι f a, ιo g x⟩) {k : ℕ}
(IH : Π{n} {a : A n} (x : P (rep f k a)), E ⟨ι f a, ι (seq_diagram_of_over g a) x⟩) :
Σ(gs : Π⦃n : ℕ⦄ {a : A n} (x : P (rep f (k+1) a)), E ⟨ι f a, ι (seq_diagram_of_over g a) x⟩),
Π⦃n : ℕ⦄ {a : A n} (x : P (rep f k (f a))),
pathover E (IH x) (glue_star g k x) (gs (transporto P (rep_f f k a) x)) :=
begin
fconstructor,
{ intro n a,
refine equiv_rect (rep_f_equiv f P a k) _ _,
intro z, refine transport E _ (IH z),
exact glue_star g k z },
{ intro n a x, exact !pathover_tr ⬝op !equiv_rect_comp⁻¹ }
end
definition g_star /- g_* -/ {E : (Σ(x : seq_colim f), seq_colim_over g x) → Type}
(e : Πn (a : A n) (x : P a), E ⟨ι f a, ιo g x⟩) {k : ℕ} :
Π {n : ℕ} {a : A n} (x : P (rep f k a)), E ⟨ι f a, ι (seq_diagram_of_over g a) x⟩ :=
begin
induction k with k IH: intro n a x,
{ exact e n a x },
{ apply (g_star_step g e @IH).1 }
end
definition g_star_path_left {E : (Σ(x : seq_colim f), seq_colim_over g x) → Type}
(e : Π⦃n⦄ ⦃a : A n⦄ (x : P a), E ⟨ι f a, ιo g x⟩)
(w : Π⦃n⦄ ⦃a : A n⦄ (x : P a), pathover E (e (g x)) (glue' g x) (e x))
{k : ℕ} {n : ℕ} {a : A n} (x : P (rep f k (f a))) :
pathover E (g_star g e x) (glue_star g k x)
(g_star g e (transporto P (rep_f f k a) x)) :=
by apply (g_star_step g e (@(g_star g e) k)).2
/- this is the bottom of the square we have to fill in the end -/
definition bottom_square {E : (Σ(x : seq_colim f), seq_colim_over g x) → Type}
(e : Π⦃n⦄ ⦃a : A n⦄ (x : P a), E ⟨ι f a, ιo g x⟩)
(w : Π⦃n⦄ ⦃a : A n⦄ (x : P a), pathover E (e (g x)) (glue' g x) (e x))
(k : ℕ) {n : ℕ} {a : A n} (x : P (rep f k (f a))) :=
move_top_of_right (natural_square
(λ b, dpair_eq_dpair (glue f a) (pathover_tr (glue f a) b) ⬝
ap (dpair (ι f a)) (seq_colim_over_glue g b))
(glue (seq_diagram_of_over g (f a)) x) ⬝hp
ap_compose (dpair (ι f a)) (to_fun (seq_colim_over_equiv g a))
(glue (seq_diagram_of_over g (f a)) x) ⬝hp
(ap02 (dpair (ι f a)) (seq_colim_over_equiv_glue g a x)⁻¹)⁻¹ ⬝hp
ap_con (dpair (ι f a))
(ap (λx, shift_down (seq_diagram_of_over g a) (ι (shift_diag (seq_diagram_of_over g a)) x))
(rep_f_equiv_natural g x))
(glue (seq_diagram_of_over g a) (to_fun (rep_f_equiv f P a k) x)))
/- this is the composition + filler -/
definition g_star_path_right_step {E : (Σ(x : seq_colim f), seq_colim_over g x) → Type}
(e : Π⦃n⦄ ⦃a : A n⦄ (x : P a), E ⟨ι f a, ιo g x⟩)
(w : Π⦃n⦄ ⦃a : A n⦄ (x : P a), pathover E (e (g x)) (glue' g x) (e x))
(k : ℕ) {n : ℕ} {a : A n} (x : P (rep f k (f a)))
(IH : Π(n : ℕ) (a : A n) (x : P (rep f k a)),
pathover E (g_star g e (seq_diagram_of_over g a x))
(ap (dpair (ι f a)) (glue (seq_diagram_of_over g a) x))
(g_star g e x)) :=
squareover_fill_r
(bottom_square g e w k x)
(change_path (glue_star_eq g (succ k) (g x)) (g_star_path_left g e w (g x)) ⬝o
pathover_ap E (dpair (ι f a))
(pathover_ap (λ (b : seq_colim (seq_diagram_of_over g a)), E ⟨ι f a, b⟩)
(ι (seq_diagram_of_over g a)) (apd (g_star g e) (rep_f_equiv_natural g x))))
(change_path (glue_star_eq g k x) (g_star_path_left g e w x))
(IH (n+1) (f a) x)
/- this is just the composition -/
definition g_star_path_right_step1 {E : (Σ(x : seq_colim f), seq_colim_over g x) → Type}
(e : Π⦃n⦄ ⦃a : A n⦄ (x : P a), E ⟨ι f a, ιo g x⟩)
(w : Π⦃n⦄ ⦃a : A n⦄ (x : P a), pathover E (e (g x)) (glue' g x) (e x))
(k : ℕ) {n : ℕ} {a : A n} (x : P (rep f k (f a)))
(IH : Π(n : ℕ) (a : A n) (x : P (rep f k a)),
pathover E (g_star g e (seq_diagram_of_over g a x))
(ap (dpair (ι f a)) (glue (seq_diagram_of_over g a) x))
(g_star g e x)) :=
(g_star_path_right_step g e w k x IH).1
definition g_star_path_right {E : (Σ(x : seq_colim f), seq_colim_over g x) → Type}
(e : Π⦃n⦄ ⦃a : A n⦄ (x : P a), E ⟨ι f a, ιo g x⟩)
(w : Π⦃n⦄ ⦃a : A n⦄ (x : P a), pathover E (e (g x)) (glue' g x) (e x))
(k : ℕ) {n : ℕ} {a : A n} (x : P (rep f k a)) :
pathover E (g_star g e (seq_diagram_of_over g a x))
(ap (dpair (ι f a)) (glue (seq_diagram_of_over g a) x))
(g_star g e x) :=
begin
revert n a x, induction k with k IH: intro n a x,
{ exact abstract begin refine pathover_cancel_left !pathover_tr⁻¹ᵒ (change_path _ (w x)),
apply sigma_eq_concato_eq end end },
{ revert x, refine equiv_rect (rep_f_equiv f P a k) _ _, intro x,
exact g_star_path_right_step1 g e w k x IH }
end
definition sigma_colim_rec_point [unfold 10] /- g -/ {E : (Σ(x : seq_colim f), seq_colim_over g x) → Type}
(e : Π⦃n⦄ ⦃a : A n⦄ (x : P a), E ⟨ι f a, ιo g x⟩)
(w : Π⦃n⦄ ⦃a : A n⦄ (x : P a), pathover E (e (g x)) (glue' g x) (e x))
{n : ℕ} {a : A n} (x : seq_colim_over g (ι f a)) : E ⟨ι f a, x⟩ :=
begin
induction x with k x k x,
{ exact g_star g e x },
{ apply pathover_of_pathover_ap E (dpair (ι f a)),
exact g_star_path_right g e w k x }
end
definition sigma_colim_rec {E : (Σ(x : seq_colim f), seq_colim_over g x) → Type}
(e : Π⦃n⦄ ⦃a : A n⦄ (x : P a), E ⟨ι f a, ιo g x⟩)
(w : Π⦃n⦄ ⦃a : A n⦄ (x : P a), pathover E (e (g x)) (glue' g x) (e x))
(v : Σ(x : seq_colim f), seq_colim_over g x) : E v :=
begin
induction v with x y,
induction x with n a n a,
{ exact sigma_colim_rec_point g e w y },
{ apply pi_pathover_left, intro x,
refine change_path (whisker_left _ !ap_inv ⬝ !con_inv_cancel_right)
(_ ⬝o pathover_ap E (dpair _) (apd (sigma_colim_rec_point g e w) !seq_colim_over_glue⁻¹)),
/- we can simplify the squareover we need to fill a bit if we apply this rule here -/
-- refine change_path (ap (sigma_eq (glue f a)) !pathover_of_tr_eq_eq_concato ⬝ !sigma_eq_con ⬝ whisker_left _ !ap_dpair⁻¹) _,
induction x with k x k x,
{ exact change_path !glue_star_eq (g_star_path_left g e w x) },
-- { exact g_star_path_left g e w x },
{ apply pathover_pathover, esimp,
refine _ ⬝hop (ap (pathover_ap E _) (apd_compose2 (sigma_colim_rec_point g e w) _ _) ⬝
pathover_ap_pathover_of_pathover_ap E (dpair (ι f a)) (seq_colim_over_equiv g a) _)⁻¹,
apply squareover_change_path_right',
refine _ ⬝hop !pathover_ap_change_path⁻¹ ⬝ ap (pathover_ap E _)
(apd02 _ !seq_colim_over_equiv_glue⁻¹),
apply squareover_change_path_right,
refine _ ⬝hop (ap (pathover_ap E _) (!apd_con ⬝ (!apd_ap ◾o idp)) ⬝ !pathover_ap_cono)⁻¹,
apply squareover_change_path_right',
apply move_right_of_top_over,
refine _ ⬝hop (ap (pathover_ap E _) !rec_glue ⬝ to_right_inv !pathover_compose _)⁻¹,
refine ap (pathover_ap E _) !rec_glue ⬝ to_right_inv !pathover_compose _ ⬝pho _,
refine _ ⬝hop !equiv_rect_comp⁻¹,
exact (g_star_path_right_step g e w k x @(g_star_path_right g e w k)).2 }}
end
/- We now define the map back, and show using this induction principle that the composites are the identity -/
variable {P}
definition colim_sigma_of_sigma_colim_constructor [unfold 7] (p : seq_colim_over g (ι f a))
: seq_colim (seq_diagram_sigma g) :=
begin
induction p with k p k p,
{ exact ι _ ⟨rep f k a, p⟩},
{ apply glue}
end
definition colim_sigma_of_sigma_colim_path1 /- μ -/ {k : ℕ} (p : P (rep f k (f a))) :
ι (seq_diagram_sigma g) ⟨rep f k (f a), p⟩ =
ι (seq_diagram_sigma g) ⟨rep f (succ k) a, transporto P (rep_f f k a) p⟩ :=
begin
apply apd0111 (λn a p, ι' (seq_diagram_sigma g) n ⟨a, p⟩) (succ_add n k) (rep_f f k a),
apply pathover_tro
end
definition colim_sigma_of_sigma_colim_path2 {k : ℕ} (p : P (rep f k (f a))) :
square (colim_sigma_of_sigma_colim_path1 g (g p)) (colim_sigma_of_sigma_colim_path1 g p)
(ap (colim_sigma_of_sigma_colim_constructor g) (glue (seq_diagram_of_over g (f a)) p))
(ap (λx, colim_sigma_of_sigma_colim_constructor g (shift_down (seq_diagram_of_over g a)
(seq_colim_functor (λk, transporto P (rep_f f k a)) (λk p, rep_f_equiv_natural g p) x)))
(glue (seq_diagram_of_over g (f a)) p)) :=
begin
refine !elim_glue ⬝ph _,
refine _ ⬝hp (ap_compose' (colim_sigma_of_sigma_colim_constructor g) _ _),
refine _ ⬝hp ap02 _ !seq_colim_over_equiv_glue⁻¹,
refine _ ⬝hp !ap_con⁻¹,
refine _ ⬝hp !ap_compose ◾ !elim_glue⁻¹,
refine _ ⬝pv whisker_rt _ (natural_square0111 P (pathover_tro (rep_f f k a) p) g
(λn a p, glue (seq_diagram_sigma g) ⟨a, p⟩)),
refine _ ⬝ whisker_left _ (ap02 _ !inv_inv⁻¹ ⬝ !ap_inv),
symmetry, apply apd0111_precompose
end
definition colim_sigma_of_sigma_colim [unfold 5] (v : Σ(x : seq_colim f), seq_colim_over g x)
: seq_colim (seq_diagram_sigma g) :=
begin
induction v with x p,
induction x with n a n a,
{ exact colim_sigma_of_sigma_colim_constructor g p },
apply arrow_pathover_constant_right, intro x, esimp at x,
refine _ ⬝ ap (colim_sigma_of_sigma_colim_constructor g) !seq_colim_over_glue⁻¹,
induction x with k p k p,
{ exact colim_sigma_of_sigma_colim_path1 g p },
apply eq_pathover, apply colim_sigma_of_sigma_colim_path2
end
/- TODO: prove and merge these theorems -/
definition colim_sigma_of_sigma_colim_glue' [unfold 5] (p : P a)
: ap (colim_sigma_of_sigma_colim g) (glue' g p) = glue (seq_diagram_sigma g) ⟨a, p⟩ :=
begin
refine !ap_dpair_eq_dpair ⬝ _,
refine !apd011_eq_apo11_apd ⬝ _,
refine ap (λx, apo11_constant_right x _) !rec_glue ⬝ _,
refine !apo11_arrow_pathover_constant_right ⬝ _, esimp,
refine whisker_right _ !idp_con ⬝ _,
rewrite [▸*, tr_eq_of_pathover_concato_eq, ap_con, ↑glue_over,
to_right_inv !pathover_equiv_tr_eq, ap_inv, inv_con_cancel_left],
apply elim_glue
end
theorem colim_sigma_of_sigma_colim_of_colim_sigma (a : seq_colim (seq_diagram_sigma g)) :
colim_sigma_of_sigma_colim g (sigma_colim_of_colim_sigma g a) = a :=
begin
induction a with n v n v,
{ induction v with a p, reflexivity },
{ induction v with a p, esimp, apply eq_pathover_id_right, apply hdeg_square,
refine ap_compose (colim_sigma_of_sigma_colim g) _ _ ⬝ _,
refine ap02 _ !elim_glue ⬝ _, exact colim_sigma_of_sigma_colim_glue' g p }
end
theorem sigma_colim_of_colim_sigma_of_sigma_colim (v : Σ(x : seq_colim f), seq_colim_over g x)
: sigma_colim_of_colim_sigma g (colim_sigma_of_sigma_colim g v) = v :=
begin
revert v, refine sigma_colim_rec _ _ _,
{ intro n a x, reflexivity },
{ intro n a x, apply eq_pathover_id_right, apply hdeg_square,
refine ap_compose (sigma_colim_of_colim_sigma g) _ _ ⬝ _,
refine ap02 _ (colim_sigma_of_sigma_colim_glue' g x) ⬝ _,
apply elim_glue }
end
variable (P)
definition sigma_seq_colim_over_equiv [constructor]
: (Σ(x : seq_colim f), seq_colim_over g x) ≃ seq_colim (seq_diagram_sigma g) :=
equiv.MK (colim_sigma_of_sigma_colim g)
(sigma_colim_of_colim_sigma g)
(colim_sigma_of_sigma_colim_of_colim_sigma g)
(sigma_colim_of_colim_sigma_of_sigma_colim g)
end over
definition seq_colim_id_equiv_seq_colim_id0 (a₀ a₁ : A 0) :
seq_colim (id_seq_diagram f 0 a₀ a₁) ≃ seq_colim (id0_seq_diagram f a₀ a₁) :=
seq_colim_equiv
(λn, !lrep_eq_lrep_irrel (nat.zero_add n))
(λn p, !lrep_eq_lrep_irrel_natural)
definition kshift_equiv_inv_incl_kshift_diag {n k : ℕ} (x : A (n + k)) :
kshift_equiv_inv f n (ι' (kshift_diag f n) k x) = ι f x :=
begin
revert A f k x, induction n with n IH: intro A f k x,
{ exact apd011 (ι' f) !nat.zero_add⁻¹ !pathover_tr⁻¹ᵒ },
{ exact !IH ⬝ apd011 (ι' f) !succ_add⁻¹ !pathover_tr⁻¹ᵒ }
end
definition incl_kshift_diag {n k : ℕ} (x : A (n + k)) :
ι' (kshift_diag f n) k x = kshift_equiv f n (ι f x) :=
eq_inv_of_eq (kshift_equiv_inv_incl_kshift_diag f x)
definition incl_kshift_diag0 {n : ℕ} (x : A n) :
ι' (kshift_diag f n) 0 x = kshift_equiv f n (ι f x) :=
incl_kshift_diag f x
definition seq_colim_eq_equiv0' (a₀ a₁ : A 0) :
ι f a₀ = ι f a₁ ≃ seq_colim (id_seq_diagram f 0 a₀ a₁) :=
begin
refine total_space_method (ι f a₀) (seq_colim_over (id0_seq_diagram_over f a₀))
_ _ (ι f a₁) ⬝e _,
{ apply @(is_trunc_equiv_closed_rev _ (sigma_seq_colim_over_equiv _ _)),
apply is_contr_seq_colim },
{ exact ιo _ idp },
/-
In the next equivalence we have to show that
seq_colim_over (id0_seq_diagram_over f a₀) (ι f a₁) ≃ seq_colim (id_seq_diagram f 0 a₀ a₁).
This looks trivial, because both of them reduce to
seq_colim (f^{0 ≤ 0+k}(a₀) = f^{0 ≤ 0+k}(a₁), ap_f).
However, not all proofs of these inequalities are definitionally equal. 3 of them are proven by
zero_le : 0 ≤ n,
but one of them (the RHS of seq_colim_over (id0_seq_diagram_over f a₀) (ι f a₁)) uses
le_add_right : n ≤ n+k
Alternatively, we could redefine le_add_right so that for n=0, it reduces to `zero_le (0+k)`.
-/
{ refine seq_colim_equiv (λn, eq_equiv_eq_closed !lrep_irrel idp) _,
intro n p, refine whisker_right _ (!lrep_irrel2⁻² ⬝ !ap_inv⁻¹) ⬝ !ap_con⁻¹ }
end
-- definition seq_colim_eq_equiv0'_natural {a₀ a₁ : A 0} {a₀' a₁' : A' 0} (p₀ : τ a₀ = a₀')
-- (p₁ : τ a₁ = a₁') :
-- hsquare (seq_colim_eq_equiv0' f a₀ a₁) (seq_colim_eq_equiv0' f' a₀' a₁')
-- (pointed.ap1_gen (seq_colim_functor τ p) (ap (ι' f' 0) p₀) (ap (ι' f' 0) p₁))
-- (seq_colim_functor (λn, pointed.ap1_gen (@τ _)) _) :=
-- _
definition seq_colim_eq_equiv0 (a₀ a₁ : A 0) : ι f a₀ = ι f a₁ ≃ seq_colim (id0_seq_diagram f a₀ a₁) :=
seq_colim_eq_equiv0' f a₀ a₁ ⬝e seq_colim_id_equiv_seq_colim_id0 f a₀ a₁
definition seq_colim_eq_equiv {n : ℕ} (a₀ a₁ : A n) :
ι f a₀ = ι f a₁ ≃ seq_colim (id_seq_diagram f n a₀ a₁) :=
eq_equiv_fn_eq (kshift_equiv f n) (ι f a₀) (ι f a₁) ⬝e
eq_equiv_eq_closed (incl_kshift_diag0 f a₀)⁻¹ (incl_kshift_diag0 f a₁)⁻¹ ⬝e
seq_colim_eq_equiv0' (kshift_diag f n) a₀ a₁ ⬝e
@seq_colim_equiv _ _ _ (λk, ap (@f _))
(λm, eq_equiv_eq_closed !lrep_kshift_diag !lrep_kshift_diag)
(λm p, whisker_right _ (whisker_right _ !ap_inv⁻¹ ⬝ !ap_con⁻¹) ⬝ !ap_con⁻¹) ⬝e
seq_colim_equiv
(λm, !lrep_eq_lrep_irrel (ap (add n) (nat.zero_add m)))
begin
intro m q,
refine _ ⬝ lrep_eq_lrep_irrel_natural f (le_add_right n m) (ap (add n) (nat.zero_add m)) q,
exact ap (λx, lrep_eq_lrep_irrel f _ _ _ _ x _) !is_prop.elim
end
open algebra
theorem is_trunc_seq_colim [instance] (k : ℕ₋₂) [H : Πn, is_trunc k (A n)] :
is_trunc k (seq_colim f) :=
begin
revert A f H, induction k with k IH: intro A f H,
{ apply is_contr_seq_colim },
{ apply is_trunc_succ_intro, intro x y,
induction x using seq_colim.rec_prop with n a,
induction y using seq_colim.rec_prop with m a',
apply is_trunc_equiv_closed,
exact eq_equiv_eq_closed (lrep_glue _ (le_max_left n m) _) (lrep_glue _ (le_max_right n m) _),
apply is_trunc_equiv_closed_rev,
apply seq_colim_eq_equiv,
apply IH, intro l, apply is_trunc_eq }
end
definition seq_colim_trunc_of_trunc_seq_colim [unfold 4] (k : ℕ₋₂) (x : trunc k (seq_colim f)) :
seq_colim (trunc_diagram k f) :=
begin induction x with x, exact seq_colim_functor (λn, tr) (λn y, idp) x end
definition trunc_seq_colim_of_seq_colim_trunc [unfold 4] (k : ℕ₋₂)
(x : seq_colim (trunc_diagram k f)) : trunc k (seq_colim f) :=
begin
induction x with n x n x,
{ induction x with a, exact tr (ι f a) },
{ induction x with a, exact ap tr (glue f a) }
end
definition trunc_seq_colim_equiv [constructor] (k : ℕ₋₂) :
trunc k (seq_colim f) ≃ seq_colim (trunc_diagram k f) :=
equiv.MK (seq_colim_trunc_of_trunc_seq_colim f k) (trunc_seq_colim_of_seq_colim_trunc f k)
abstract begin
intro x, induction x with n x n x,
{ induction x with a, reflexivity },
{ induction x with a, apply eq_pathover_id_right, apply hdeg_square,
refine ap_compose (seq_colim_trunc_of_trunc_seq_colim f k) _ _ ⬝ ap02 _ !elim_glue ⬝ _,
refine !ap_compose' ⬝ !elim_glue ⬝ _, exact !idp_con }
end end
abstract begin
intro x, induction x with x, induction x with n a n a,
{ reflexivity },
{ apply eq_pathover, apply hdeg_square,
refine ap_compose (trunc_seq_colim_of_seq_colim_trunc f k) _ _ ⬝ ap02 _ !elim_glue ⬝ _,
refine !ap_compose' ⬝ !elim_glue }
end end
theorem is_conn_seq_colim [instance] (k : ℕ₋₂) [H : Πn, is_conn k (A n)] :
is_conn k (seq_colim f) :=
is_trunc_equiv_closed_rev -2 (trunc_seq_colim_equiv f k) _
/- the colimit of a sequence of fibers is the fiber of the functorial action of the colimit -/
definition domain_seq_colim_functor {A A' : ℕ → Type} {f : seq_diagram A}
{f' : seq_diagram A'} (τ : Πn, A' n → A n)
(p : Π⦃n⦄, τ (n+1) ∘ @f' n ~ @f n ∘ @τ n) :
(Σ(x : seq_colim f), seq_colim_over (seq_diagram_over_fiber τ p) x) ≃ seq_colim f' :=
begin
transitivity seq_colim (seq_diagram_sigma (seq_diagram_over_fiber τ p)),
exact sigma_seq_colim_over_equiv _ (seq_diagram_over_fiber τ p),
exact seq_colim_equiv (λn, sigma_fiber_equiv (τ n)) (λn x, idp)
end
definition fiber_seq_colim_functor {A A' : ℕ → Type} {f : seq_diagram A}
{f' : seq_diagram A'} (τ : Πn, A' n → A n)
(p : Π⦃n⦄, τ (n+1) ∘ @f' n ~ @f n ∘ @τ n) {n : ℕ} (a : A n) :
fiber (seq_colim_functor τ p) (ι f a) ≃ seq_colim (seq_diagram_fiber τ p a) :=
begin
refine _ ⬝e fiber_pr1 (seq_colim_over (seq_diagram_over_fiber τ p)) (ι f a),
apply fiber_equiv_of_triangle (domain_seq_colim_functor τ p)⁻¹ᵉ,
refine _ ⬝hty λx, (colim_sigma_triangle _ _)⁻¹,
apply homotopy_inv_of_homotopy_pre (seq_colim_equiv _ _)
(seq_colim_functor _ _) (seq_colim_functor _ _),
refine (λx, !seq_colim_functor_compose⁻¹) ⬝hty _,
refine seq_colim_functor_homotopy _ _,
intro n x, exact point_eq x.2,
intro n x, induction x with x y, induction y with y q, induction q,
apply square_of_eq, refine !idp_con⁻¹
end
definition fiber_seq_colim_functor0 {A A' : ℕ → Type} {f : seq_diagram A}
{f' : seq_diagram A'} (τ : Πn, A' n → A n)
(p : Π⦃n⦄, τ (n+1) ∘ @f' n ~ @f n ∘ @τ n) (a : A 0) :
fiber (seq_colim_functor τ p) (ι f a) ≃ seq_colim (seq_diagram_fiber0 τ p a) :=
fiber_seq_colim_functor τ p a ⬝e
seq_colim_equiv
(λn, equiv_apd011 (λx y, fiber (τ x) y) (rep_pathover_rep0 f a))
(λn x, sorry)
-- maybe use fn_tro_eq_tro_fn2
variables {f f'}
definition fiber_inclusion (x : seq_colim f) :
fiber (ι' f 0) x ≃ fiber (seq_colim_functor (rep0 f) (λn a, idp)) x :=
fiber_equiv_of_triangle (seq_colim_constant_seq (A 0))⁻¹ᵉ homotopy.rfl
theorem is_trunc_fun_seq_colim_functor (k : ℕ₋₂) (H : Πn, is_trunc_fun k (@τ n)) :
is_trunc_fun k (seq_colim_functor τ p) :=
begin
intro x, induction x using seq_colim.rec_prop,
exact is_trunc_equiv_closed_rev k (fiber_seq_colim_functor τ p a) _
end
open is_conn
theorem is_conn_fun_seq_colim_functor (k : ℕ₋₂) (H : Πn, is_conn_fun k (@τ n)) :
is_conn_fun k (seq_colim_functor τ p) :=
begin
intro x, induction x using seq_colim.rec_prop,
exact is_conn_equiv_closed_rev k (fiber_seq_colim_functor τ p a) _
end
variables (f f')
theorem is_trunc_fun_inclusion (k : ℕ₋₂) (H : Πn, is_trunc_fun k (@f n)) :
is_trunc_fun k (ι' f 0) :=
begin
intro x,
apply is_trunc_equiv_closed_rev k (fiber_inclusion x),
apply is_trunc_fun_seq_colim_functor,
intro n, apply is_trunc_fun_lrep, exact H
end
theorem is_conn_fun_inclusion (k : ℕ₋₂) (H : Πn, is_conn_fun k (@f n)) :
is_conn_fun k (ι' f 0) :=
begin
intro x,
apply is_conn_equiv_closed_rev k (fiber_inclusion x),
apply is_conn_fun_seq_colim_functor,
intro n, apply is_conn_fun_lrep, exact H
end
/- the sequential colimit of standard finite types is ℕ -/
open fin
definition nat_of_seq_colim_fin [unfold 1] (x : seq_colim seq_diagram_fin) : ℕ :=
begin
induction x with n x n x,
{ exact x },
{ reflexivity }
end
definition seq_colim_fin_of_nat (n : ℕ) : seq_colim seq_diagram_fin :=
ι' _ (n+1) (fin.mk n (self_lt_succ n))
definition lrep_seq_diagram_fin {n : ℕ} (x : fin n) :
lrep seq_diagram_fin (is_lt x) (fin.mk x (self_lt_succ x)) = x :=
begin
induction x with k H, esimp, induction H with n H p,
reflexivity,
exact ap (@lift_succ _) p
end
definition lrep_seq_diagram_fin_lift_succ {n : ℕ} (x : fin n) :
lrep_seq_diagram_fin (lift_succ x) = ap (@lift_succ _) (lrep_seq_diagram_fin x) :=
begin
induction x with k H, reflexivity
end
definition seq_colim_fin_equiv [constructor] : seq_colim seq_diagram_fin ≃ ℕ :=
equiv.MK nat_of_seq_colim_fin seq_colim_fin_of_nat
abstract begin
intro n, reflexivity
end end
abstract begin
intro x, induction x with n x n x,
{ esimp, refine (lrep_glue _ (is_lt x) _)⁻¹ ⬝ ap (ι _) (lrep_seq_diagram_fin x), },
{ apply eq_pathover_id_right,
refine ap_compose seq_colim_fin_of_nat _ _ ⬝ ap02 _ !elim_glue ⬝ph _,
esimp, refine (square_of_eq !con_idp)⁻¹ʰ ⬝h _,
refine _ ⬝pv natural_square_tr (@glue _ (seq_diagram_fin) n) (lrep_seq_diagram_fin x),
refine ap02 _ !lrep_seq_diagram_fin_lift_succ ⬝ !ap_compose⁻¹ }
end end
/- the sequential colimit of embeddings is an embedding -/
definition seq_colim_eq_equiv0'_inv_refl (a₀ : A 0) :
(seq_colim_eq_equiv0' f a₀ a₀)⁻¹ᵉ (ι' (id_seq_diagram f 0 a₀ a₀) 0 proof (refl a₀) qed) = refl (ι f a₀) :=
begin
apply inv_eq_of_eq,
reflexivity,
end
definition is_embedding_ι (H : Πn, is_embedding (@f n)) : is_embedding (ι' f 0) :=
begin
intro x y, fapply is_equiv_of_equiv_of_homotopy,
{ symmetry, refine seq_colim_eq_equiv0' f x y ⬝e _,
apply equiv_of_is_equiseq, intro n, apply H },
{ intro p, induction p, apply seq_colim_eq_equiv0'_inv_refl }
end
end seq_colim
|
e94990b04db4a49f197534203912b872fd5243af | 5756a081670ba9c1d1d3fca7bd47cb4e31beae66 | /PrintAST.lean | ceb68f54f3a566c04b5e9197c647c392df8d9897 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathport | 2c9bdc8292168febf59799efdc5451dbf0450d4a | 13051f68064f7638970d39a8fecaede68ffbf9e1 | refs/heads/master | 1,693,841,364,079 | 1,693,813,111,000 | 1,693,813,111,000 | 379,357,010 | 27 | 10 | Apache-2.0 | 1,691,309,132,000 | 1,624,384,521,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 255 | lean | import Mathport.Syntax.Parse
open Mathport
def main (args : List String) : IO Unit := do
for fileName in args do
let (ast3, tacticInvocations) ← parseAST3 fileName
IO.println (repr ast3)
for ti in tacticInvocations do IO.println (repr ti) |
1c496801a27dd41440db3e9e238f196955d955ad | 4727251e0cd73359b15b664c3170e5d754078599 | /src/analysis/normed_space/hahn_banach.lean | 2a49649ee1276525107006ae099dd6b03e85b321 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vierkantor/mathlib | 0ea59ac32a3a43c93c44d70f441c4ee810ccceca | 83bc3b9ce9b13910b57bda6b56222495ebd31c2f | refs/heads/master | 1,658,323,012,449 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 1,652,256,003,000 | 209,296,341 | 0 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,568,807,655,000 | 1,568,807,655,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,469 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Heather Macbeth
-/
import analysis.convex.cone
import analysis.normed_space.is_R_or_C
import analysis.normed_space.extend
/-!
# Hahn-Banach theorem
In this file we prove a version of Hahn-Banach theorem for continuous linear
functions on normed spaces over `ℝ` and `ℂ`.
In order to state and prove its corollaries uniformly, we prove the statements for a field `𝕜`
satisfying `is_R_or_C 𝕜`.
In this setting, `exists_dual_vector` states that, for any nonzero `x`, there exists a continuous
linear form `g` of norm `1` with `g x = ∥x∥` (where the norm has to be interpreted as an element
of `𝕜`).
-/
universes u v
namespace real
variables {E : Type*} [semi_normed_group E] [normed_space ℝ E]
/-- Hahn-Banach theorem for continuous linear functions over `ℝ`. -/
theorem exists_extension_norm_eq (p : subspace ℝ E) (f : p →L[ℝ] ℝ) :
∃ g : E →L[ℝ] ℝ, (∀ x : p, g x = f x) ∧ ∥g∥ = ∥f∥ :=
begin
rcases exists_extension_of_le_sublinear ⟨p, f⟩ (λ x, ∥f∥ * ∥x∥)
(λ c hc x, by simp only [norm_smul c x, real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_pos hc, mul_left_comm])
(λ x y, _) (λ x, le_trans (le_abs_self _) (f.le_op_norm _))
with ⟨g, g_eq, g_le⟩,
set g' := g.mk_continuous (∥f∥)
(λ x, abs_le.2 ⟨neg_le.1 $ g.map_neg x ▸ norm_neg x ▸ g_le (-x), g_le x⟩),
{ refine ⟨g', g_eq, _⟩,
{ apply le_antisymm (g.mk_continuous_norm_le (norm_nonneg f) _),
refine f.op_norm_le_bound (norm_nonneg _) (λ x, _),
dsimp at g_eq,
rw ← g_eq,
apply g'.le_op_norm } },
{ simp only [← mul_add],
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (norm_add_le x y) (norm_nonneg f) }
end
end real
section is_R_or_C
open is_R_or_C
variables {𝕜 : Type*} [is_R_or_C 𝕜] {F : Type*} [semi_normed_group F] [normed_space 𝕜 F]
/-- Hahn-Banach theorem for continuous linear functions over `𝕜` satisyfing `is_R_or_C 𝕜`. -/
theorem exists_extension_norm_eq (p : subspace 𝕜 F) (f : p →L[𝕜] 𝕜) :
∃ g : F →L[𝕜] 𝕜, (∀ x : p, g x = f x) ∧ ∥g∥ = ∥f∥ :=
begin
letI : module ℝ F := restrict_scalars.module ℝ 𝕜 F,
letI : is_scalar_tower ℝ 𝕜 F := restrict_scalars.is_scalar_tower _ _ _,
letI : normed_space ℝ F := normed_space.restrict_scalars _ 𝕜 _,
-- Let `fr: p →L[ℝ] ℝ` be the real part of `f`.
let fr := re_clm.comp (f.restrict_scalars ℝ),
have fr_apply : ∀ x, fr x = re (f x), by { assume x, refl },
-- Use the real version to get a norm-preserving extension of `fr`, which
-- we'll call `g : F →L[ℝ] ℝ`.
rcases real.exists_extension_norm_eq (p.restrict_scalars ℝ) fr with ⟨g, ⟨hextends, hnormeq⟩⟩,
-- Now `g` can be extended to the `F →L[𝕜] 𝕜` we need.
refine ⟨g.extend_to_𝕜, _⟩,
-- It is an extension of `f`.
have h : ∀ x : p, g.extend_to_𝕜 x = f x,
{ assume x,
rw [continuous_linear_map.extend_to_𝕜_apply, ←submodule.coe_smul, hextends, hextends],
have : (fr x : 𝕜) - I * ↑(fr (I • x)) = (re (f x) : 𝕜) - (I : 𝕜) * (re (f ((I : 𝕜) • x))),
by refl,
rw this,
apply ext,
{ simp only [add_zero, algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, I_re, of_real_im, add_monoid_hom.map_add,
zero_sub, I_im', zero_mul, of_real_re, eq_self_iff_true, sub_zero, mul_neg,
of_real_neg, mul_re, mul_zero, sub_neg_eq_add, continuous_linear_map.map_smul] },
{ simp only [algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, I_re, of_real_im, add_monoid_hom.map_add, zero_sub, I_im',
zero_mul, of_real_re, mul_neg, mul_im, zero_add, of_real_neg, mul_re,
sub_neg_eq_add, continuous_linear_map.map_smul] } },
-- And we derive the equality of the norms by bounding on both sides.
refine ⟨h, le_antisymm _ _⟩,
{ calc ∥g.extend_to_𝕜∥
≤ ∥g∥ : g.extend_to_𝕜.op_norm_le_bound g.op_norm_nonneg (norm_bound _)
... = ∥fr∥ : hnormeq
... ≤ ∥re_clm∥ * ∥f∥ : continuous_linear_map.op_norm_comp_le _ _
... = ∥f∥ : by rw [re_clm_norm, one_mul] },
{ exact f.op_norm_le_bound g.extend_to_𝕜.op_norm_nonneg (λ x, h x ▸ g.extend_to_𝕜.le_op_norm x) }
end
end is_R_or_C
section dual_vector
variables (𝕜 : Type v) [is_R_or_C 𝕜]
variables {E : Type u} [normed_group E] [normed_space 𝕜 E]
open continuous_linear_equiv submodule
open_locale classical
lemma coord_norm' {x : E} (h : x ≠ 0) : ∥(∥x∥ : 𝕜) • coord 𝕜 x h∥ = 1 :=
by rw [norm_smul, is_R_or_C.norm_coe_norm, coord_norm, mul_inv_cancel (mt norm_eq_zero.mp h)]
/-- Corollary of Hahn-Banach. Given a nonzero element `x` of a normed space, there exists an
element of the dual space, of norm `1`, whose value on `x` is `∥x∥`. -/
theorem exists_dual_vector (x : E) (h : x ≠ 0) : ∃ g : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜, ∥g∥ = 1 ∧ g x = ∥x∥ :=
begin
let p : submodule 𝕜 E := 𝕜 ∙ x,
let f := (∥x∥ : 𝕜) • coord 𝕜 x h,
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := exists_extension_norm_eq p f,
refine ⟨g, _, _⟩,
{ rw [hg.2, coord_norm'] },
{ calc g x = g (⟨x, mem_span_singleton_self x⟩ : 𝕜 ∙ x) : by rw coe_mk
... = ((∥x∥ : 𝕜) • coord 𝕜 x h) (⟨x, mem_span_singleton_self x⟩ : 𝕜 ∙ x) : by rw ← hg.1
... = ∥x∥ : by simp }
end
/-- Variant of Hahn-Banach, eliminating the hypothesis that `x` be nonzero, and choosing
the dual element arbitrarily when `x = 0`. -/
theorem exists_dual_vector' [nontrivial E] (x : E) :
∃ g : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜, ∥g∥ = 1 ∧ g x = ∥x∥ :=
begin
by_cases hx : x = 0,
{ obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := exists_ne (0 : E),
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ : ∃ g : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜, ∥g∥ = 1 ∧ g y = ∥y∥ := exists_dual_vector 𝕜 y hy,
refine ⟨g, hg.left, _⟩,
simp [hx] },
{ exact exists_dual_vector 𝕜 x hx }
end
/-- Variant of Hahn-Banach, eliminating the hypothesis that `x` be nonzero, but only ensuring that
the dual element has norm at most `1` (this can not be improved for the trivial
vector space). -/
theorem exists_dual_vector'' (x : E) :
∃ g : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜, ∥g∥ ≤ 1 ∧ g x = ∥x∥ :=
begin
by_cases hx : x = 0,
{ refine ⟨0, by simp, _⟩,
symmetry,
simp [hx], },
{ rcases exists_dual_vector 𝕜 x hx with ⟨g, g_norm, g_eq⟩,
exact ⟨g, g_norm.le, g_eq⟩ }
end
end dual_vector
|
68ed8fec61c1f75db7b83b8679643f42f418ed6c | 75db7e3219bba2fbf41bf5b905f34fcb3c6ca3f2 | /hott/types/arrow.hlean | 94397298d9ed9f92dba0c18cf7eb7b7d23cb119d | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jroesch/lean | 30ef0860fa905d35b9ad6f76de1a4f65c9af6871 | 3de4ec1a6ce9a960feb2a48eeea8b53246fa34f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,586,090,835,348 | 1,455,142,203,000 | 1,455,142,277,000 | 51,536,958 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,455,215,811,000 | 1,455,215,811,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 5,125 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Floris van Doorn
Ported from Coq HoTT
Theorems about arrow types (function spaces)
-/
import types.pi
open eq equiv is_equiv funext pi equiv.ops is_trunc unit
namespace pi
variables {A A' : Type} {B B' : Type} {C : A → B → Type} {D : A → Type}
{a a' a'' : A} {b b' b'' : B} {f g : A → B} {d : D a} {d' : D a'}
-- all lemmas here are special cases of the ones for pi-types
/- Functorial action -/
variables (f0 : A' → A) (f1 : B → B')
definition arrow_functor [unfold_full] : (A → B) → (A' → B') := pi_functor f0 (λa, f1)
/- Equivalences -/
definition is_equiv_arrow_functor [constructor]
[H0 : is_equiv f0] [H1 : is_equiv f1] : is_equiv (arrow_functor f0 f1) :=
is_equiv_pi_functor f0 (λa, f1)
definition arrow_equiv_arrow_rev [constructor] (f0 : A' ≃ A) (f1 : B ≃ B')
: (A → B) ≃ (A' → B') :=
equiv.mk _ (is_equiv_arrow_functor f0 f1)
definition arrow_equiv_arrow [constructor] (f0 : A ≃ A') (f1 : B ≃ B') : (A → B) ≃ (A' → B') :=
arrow_equiv_arrow_rev (equiv.symm f0) f1
variable (A)
definition arrow_equiv_arrow_right [constructor] (f1 : B ≃ B') : (A → B) ≃ (A → B') :=
arrow_equiv_arrow_rev equiv.refl f1
variables {A} (B)
definition arrow_equiv_arrow_left_rev [constructor] (f0 : A' ≃ A) : (A → B) ≃ (A' → B) :=
arrow_equiv_arrow_rev f0 equiv.refl
definition arrow_equiv_arrow_left [constructor] (f0 : A ≃ A') : (A → B) ≃ (A' → B) :=
arrow_equiv_arrow f0 equiv.refl
variables {B}
definition arrow_equiv_arrow_right' [constructor] (f1 : A → (B ≃ B')) : (A → B) ≃ (A → B') :=
pi_equiv_pi_id f1
/- Equivalence if one of the types is contractible -/
variables (A B)
definition arrow_equiv_of_is_contr_left [constructor] [H : is_contr A] : (A → B) ≃ B :=
!pi_equiv_of_is_contr_left
definition arrow_equiv_of_is_contr_right [constructor] [H : is_contr B] : (A → B) ≃ unit :=
!pi_equiv_of_is_contr_right
/- Interaction with other type constructors -/
-- most of these are in the file of the other type constructor
definition arrow_empty_left [constructor] : (empty → B) ≃ unit :=
!pi_empty_left
definition arrow_unit_left [constructor] : (unit → B) ≃ B :=
!arrow_equiv_of_is_contr_left
definition arrow_unit_right [constructor] : (A → unit) ≃ unit :=
!arrow_equiv_of_is_contr_right
variables {A B}
/- Transport -/
definition arrow_transport {B C : A → Type} (p : a = a') (f : B a → C a)
: (transport (λa, B a → C a) p f) ~ (λb, p ▸ f (p⁻¹ ▸ b)) :=
eq.rec_on p (λx, idp)
/- Pathovers -/
definition arrow_pathover {B C : A → Type} {f : B a → C a} {g : B a' → C a'} {p : a = a'}
(r : Π(b : B a) (b' : B a') (q : b =[p] b'), f b =[p] g b') : f =[p] g :=
begin
cases p, apply pathover_idp_of_eq,
apply eq_of_homotopy, intro b,
exact eq_of_pathover_idp (r b b idpo),
end
definition arrow_pathover_left {B C : A → Type} {f : B a → C a} {g : B a' → C a'} {p : a = a'}
(r : Π(b : B a), f b =[p] g (p ▸ b)) : f =[p] g :=
begin
induction p, apply pathover_idp_of_eq,
apply eq_of_homotopy, intro b,
exact eq_of_pathover_idp (r b),
end
definition arrow_pathover_right {B C : A → Type} {f : B a → C a} {g : B a' → C a'} {p : a = a'}
(r : Π(b' : B a'), f (p⁻¹ ▸ b') =[p] g b') : f =[p] g :=
begin
cases p, apply pathover_idp_of_eq,
apply eq_of_homotopy, intro b,
exact eq_of_pathover_idp (r b),
end
definition arrow_pathover_constant_left {B : Type} {C : A → Type} {f : B → C a} {g : B → C a'}
{p : a = a'} (r : Π(b : B), f b =[p] g b) : f =[p] g :=
pi_pathover_constant r
definition arrow_pathover_constant_right' {B : A → Type} {C : Type}
{f : B a → C} {g : B a' → C} {p : a = a'}
(r : Π⦃b : B a⦄ ⦃b' : B a'⦄ (q : b =[p] b'), f b = g b') : f =[p] g :=
arrow_pathover (λb b' q, pathover_of_eq (r q))
definition arrow_pathover_constant_right {B : A → Type} {C : Type} {f : B a → C}
{g : B a' → C} {p : a = a'} (r : Π(b : B a), f b = g (p ▸ b)) : f =[p] g :=
arrow_pathover_left (λb, pathover_of_eq (r b))
/- a lemma used for the flattening lemma -/
definition apo011_arrow_pathover_constant_right {f : D a → A'} {g : D a' → A'} {p : a = a'}
{q : d =[p] d'} (r : Π(d : D a), f d = g (p ▸ d))
: eq_of_pathover (apo11 (arrow_pathover_constant_right r) q) = r d ⬝ ap g (tr_eq_of_pathover q)
:=
begin
induction q, esimp at r,
eapply homotopy.rec_on r, clear r, esimp, intro r, induction r, esimp,
esimp [arrow_pathover_constant_right, arrow_pathover_left],
rewrite [eq_of_homotopy_idp]
end
/-
The fact that the arrow type preserves truncation level is a direct consequence
of the fact that pi's preserve truncation level
-/
definition is_trunc_arrow (B : Type) (n : trunc_index) [H : is_trunc n B] : is_trunc n (A → B) :=
_
end pi
|
d7223007cb4e0125fd607d2c50747a786afb69f8 | 57c233acf9386e610d99ed20ef139c5f97504ba3 | /src/data/list/sigma.lean | e3065c48f913199f9150f2fbd9a2659ab97af96e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | robertylewis/mathlib | 3d16e3e6daf5ddde182473e03a1b601d2810952c | 1d13f5b932f5e40a8308e3840f96fc882fae01f0 | refs/heads/master | 1,651,379,945,369 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 1,644,276,960,000 | 98,875,504 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,644,253,514,000 | 1,501,495,700,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 25,747 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Sean Leather
-/
import data.list.range
import data.list.perm
/-!
# Utilities for lists of sigmas
This file includes several ways of interacting with `list (sigma β)`, treated as a key-value store.
If `α : Type*` and `β : α → Type*`, then we regard `s : sigma β` as having key `s.1 : α` and value
`s.2 : β s.1`. Hence, `list (sigma β)` behaves like a key-value store.
## Main Definitions
- `list.keys` extracts the list of keys.
- `list.nodupkeys` determines if the store has duplicate keys.
- `list.lookup`/`lookup_all` accesses the value(s) of a particular key.
- `list.kreplace` replaces the first value with a given key by a given value.
- `list.kerase` removes a value.
- `list.kinsert` inserts a value.
- `list.kunion` computes the union of two stores.
- `list.kextract` returns a value with a given key and the rest of the values.
-/
universes u v
namespace list
variables {α : Type u} {β : α → Type v}
/-! ### `keys` -/
/-- List of keys from a list of key-value pairs -/
def keys : list (sigma β) → list α := map sigma.fst
@[simp] theorem keys_nil : @keys α β [] = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem keys_cons {s} {l : list (sigma β)} : (s :: l).keys = s.1 :: l.keys := rfl
theorem mem_keys_of_mem {s : sigma β} {l : list (sigma β)} : s ∈ l → s.1 ∈ l.keys :=
mem_map_of_mem sigma.fst
theorem exists_of_mem_keys {a} {l : list (sigma β)} (h : a ∈ l.keys) :
∃ (b : β a), sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
let ⟨⟨a', b'⟩, m, e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h in
eq.rec_on e (exists.intro b' m)
theorem mem_keys {a} {l : list (sigma β)} : a ∈ l.keys ↔ ∃ (b : β a), sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
⟨exists_of_mem_keys, λ ⟨b, h⟩, mem_keys_of_mem h⟩
theorem not_mem_keys {a} {l : list (sigma β)} : a ∉ l.keys ↔ ∀ b : β a, sigma.mk a b ∉ l :=
(not_iff_not_of_iff mem_keys).trans not_exists
theorem not_eq_key {a} {l : list (sigma β)} : a ∉ l.keys ↔ ∀ s : sigma β, s ∈ l → a ≠ s.1 :=
iff.intro
(λ h₁ s h₂ e, absurd (mem_keys_of_mem h₂) (by rwa e at h₁))
(λ f h₁, let ⟨b, h₂⟩ := exists_of_mem_keys h₁ in f _ h₂ rfl)
/-! ### `nodupkeys` -/
/-- Determines whether the store uses a key several times. -/
def nodupkeys (l : list (sigma β)) : Prop := l.keys.nodup
theorem nodupkeys_iff_pairwise {l} : nodupkeys l ↔
pairwise (λ s s' : sigma β, s.1 ≠ s'.1) l := pairwise_map _
theorem nodupkeys.pairwise_ne {l} (h : nodupkeys l) :
pairwise (λ s s' : sigma β, s.1 ≠ s'.1) l :=
nodupkeys_iff_pairwise.1 h
@[simp] theorem nodupkeys_nil : @nodupkeys α β [] := pairwise.nil
@[simp] theorem nodupkeys_cons {s : sigma β} {l : list (sigma β)} :
nodupkeys (s::l) ↔ s.1 ∉ l.keys ∧ nodupkeys l :=
by simp [keys, nodupkeys]
theorem nodupkeys.eq_of_fst_eq {l : list (sigma β)}
(nd : nodupkeys l) {s s' : sigma β} (h : s ∈ l) (h' : s' ∈ l) :
s.1 = s'.1 → s = s' :=
@forall_of_forall_of_pairwise _
(λ s s' : sigma β, s.1 = s'.1 → s = s')
(λ s s' H h, (H h.symm).symm) _ (λ x h _, rfl)
((nodupkeys_iff_pairwise.1 nd).imp (λ s s' h h', (h h').elim)) _ h _ h'
theorem nodupkeys.eq_of_mk_mem {a : α} {b b' : β a} {l : list (sigma β)}
(nd : nodupkeys l) (h : sigma.mk a b ∈ l) (h' : sigma.mk a b' ∈ l) : b = b' :=
by cases nd.eq_of_fst_eq h h' rfl; refl
theorem nodupkeys_singleton (s : sigma β) : nodupkeys [s] := nodup_singleton _
theorem nodupkeys_of_sublist {l₁ l₂ : list (sigma β)} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) :
nodupkeys l₂ → nodupkeys l₁ :=
nodup_of_sublist (h.map _)
theorem nodup_of_nodupkeys {l : list (sigma β)} : nodupkeys l → nodup l :=
nodup_of_nodup_map _
theorem perm_nodupkeys {l₁ l₂ : list (sigma β)} (h : l₁ ~ l₂) : nodupkeys l₁ ↔ nodupkeys l₂ :=
(h.map _).nodup_iff
theorem nodupkeys_join {L : list (list (sigma β))} :
nodupkeys (join L) ↔ (∀ l ∈ L, nodupkeys l) ∧ pairwise disjoint (L.map keys) :=
begin
rw [nodupkeys_iff_pairwise, pairwise_join, pairwise_map],
refine and_congr (ball_congr $ λ l h, by simp [nodupkeys_iff_pairwise]) _,
apply iff_of_eq, congr' with l₁ l₂,
simp [keys, disjoint_iff_ne]
end
theorem nodup_enum_map_fst (l : list α) : (l.enum.map prod.fst).nodup :=
by simp [list.nodup_range]
lemma mem_ext {l₀ l₁ : list (sigma β)}
(nd₀ : l₀.nodup) (nd₁ : l₁.nodup)
(h : ∀ x, x ∈ l₀ ↔ x ∈ l₁) : l₀ ~ l₁ :=
begin
induction l₀ with x xs generalizing l₁; cases l₁ with y ys,
{ constructor },
iterate 2
{ specialize h x <|> specialize h y, simp at h,
cases h },
simp at nd₀ nd₁, classical,
cases nd₀, cases nd₁,
by_cases h' : x = y,
{ subst y, constructor, apply l₀_ih ‹ _ › ‹ nodup ys ›,
intro a, specialize h a, simp at h,
by_cases h' : a = x,
{ subst a, rw ← not_iff_not, split; intro; assumption },
{ simp [h'] at h, exact h } },
{ transitivity x :: y :: ys.erase x,
{ constructor, apply l₀_ih ‹ _ ›,
{ simp, split, { intro, apply nd₁_left, apply mem_of_mem_erase ‹_› },
apply nodup_erase_of_nodup; assumption },
{ intro a, specialize h a, simp at h,
by_cases h' : a = x,
{ subst a, rw ← not_iff_not, split; intro, simp [mem_erase_of_nodup,*], assumption },
{ simp [h'] at h, simp [h], apply or_congr, refl,
simp [mem_erase_of_ne,*] } } },
transitivity y :: x :: ys.erase x,
{ constructor },
{ constructor, symmetry, apply perm_cons_erase,
specialize h x, simp [h'] at h, exact h } }
end
variables [decidable_eq α]
/-! ### `lookup` -/
/-- `lookup a l` is the first value in `l` corresponding to the key `a`,
or `none` if no such element exists. -/
def lookup (a : α) : list (sigma β) → option (β a)
| [] := none
| (⟨a', b⟩ :: l) := if h : a' = a then some (eq.rec_on h b) else lookup l
@[simp] theorem lookup_nil (a : α) : lookup a [] = @none (β a) := rfl
@[simp] theorem lookup_cons_eq (l) (a : α) (b : β a) : lookup a (⟨a, b⟩::l) = some b :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp] theorem lookup_cons_ne (l) {a} :
∀ s : sigma β, a ≠ s.1 → lookup a (s::l) = lookup a l
| ⟨a', b⟩ h := dif_neg h.symm
theorem lookup_is_some {a : α} : ∀ {l : list (sigma β)},
(lookup a l).is_some ↔ a ∈ l.keys
| [] := by simp
| (⟨a', b⟩ :: l) := begin
by_cases h : a = a',
{ subst a', simp },
{ simp [h, lookup_is_some] },
end
theorem lookup_eq_none {a : α} {l : list (sigma β)} :
lookup a l = none ↔ a ∉ l.keys :=
by simp [← lookup_is_some, option.is_none_iff_eq_none]
theorem of_mem_lookup
{a : α} {b : β a} : ∀ {l : list (sigma β)}, b ∈ lookup a l → sigma.mk a b ∈ l
| (⟨a', b'⟩ :: l) H := begin
by_cases h : a = a',
{ subst a', simp at H, simp [H] },
{ simp [h] at H, exact or.inr (of_mem_lookup H) }
end
theorem mem_lookup {a} {b : β a} {l : list (sigma β)} (nd : l.nodupkeys)
(h : sigma.mk a b ∈ l) : b ∈ lookup a l :=
begin
cases option.is_some_iff_exists.mp (lookup_is_some.mpr (mem_keys_of_mem h)) with b' h',
cases nd.eq_of_mk_mem h (of_mem_lookup h'),
exact h'
end
theorem map_lookup_eq_find (a : α) : ∀ l : list (sigma β),
(lookup a l).map (sigma.mk a) = find (λ s, a = s.1) l
| [] := rfl
| (⟨a', b'⟩ :: l) := begin
by_cases h : a = a',
{ subst a', simp },
{ simp [h, map_lookup_eq_find] }
end
theorem mem_lookup_iff {a : α} {b : β a} {l : list (sigma β)} (nd : l.nodupkeys) :
b ∈ lookup a l ↔ sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
⟨of_mem_lookup, mem_lookup nd⟩
theorem perm_lookup (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list (sigma β)}
(nd₁ : l₁.nodupkeys) (nd₂ : l₂.nodupkeys) (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : lookup a l₁ = lookup a l₂ :=
by ext b; simp [mem_lookup_iff, nd₁, nd₂]; exact p.mem_iff
lemma lookup_ext {l₀ l₁ : list (sigma β)}
(nd₀ : l₀.nodupkeys) (nd₁ : l₁.nodupkeys)
(h : ∀ x y, y ∈ l₀.lookup x ↔ y ∈ l₁.lookup x) : l₀ ~ l₁ :=
mem_ext (nodup_of_nodupkeys nd₀) (nodup_of_nodupkeys nd₁)
(λ ⟨a,b⟩, by rw [← mem_lookup_iff, ← mem_lookup_iff, h]; assumption)
/-! ### `lookup_all` -/
/-- `lookup_all a l` is the list of all values in `l` corresponding to the key `a`. -/
def lookup_all (a : α) : list (sigma β) → list (β a)
| [] := []
| (⟨a', b⟩ :: l) := if h : a' = a then eq.rec_on h b :: lookup_all l else lookup_all l
@[simp] theorem lookup_all_nil (a : α) : lookup_all a [] = @nil (β a) := rfl
@[simp] theorem lookup_all_cons_eq (l) (a : α) (b : β a) :
lookup_all a (⟨a, b⟩::l) = b :: lookup_all a l :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp] theorem lookup_all_cons_ne (l) {a} :
∀ s : sigma β, a ≠ s.1 → lookup_all a (s::l) = lookup_all a l
| ⟨a', b⟩ h := dif_neg h.symm
theorem lookup_all_eq_nil {a : α} : ∀ {l : list (sigma β)},
lookup_all a l = [] ↔ ∀ b : β a, sigma.mk a b ∉ l
| [] := by simp
| (⟨a', b⟩ :: l) := begin
by_cases h : a = a',
{ subst a', simp },
{ simp [h, lookup_all_eq_nil] },
end
theorem head_lookup_all (a : α) : ∀ l : list (sigma β),
head' (lookup_all a l) = lookup a l
| [] := by simp
| (⟨a', b⟩ :: l) := by by_cases h : a = a'; [{subst h, simp}, simp *]
theorem mem_lookup_all {a : α} {b : β a} :
∀ {l : list (sigma β)}, b ∈ lookup_all a l ↔ sigma.mk a b ∈ l
| [] := by simp
| (⟨a', b'⟩ :: l) := by by_cases h : a = a'; [{subst h, simp *}, simp *]
theorem lookup_all_sublist (a : α) :
∀ l : list (sigma β), (lookup_all a l).map (sigma.mk a) <+ l
| [] := by simp
| (⟨a', b'⟩ :: l) := begin
by_cases h : a = a',
{ subst h, simp, exact (lookup_all_sublist l).cons2 _ _ _ },
{ simp [h], exact (lookup_all_sublist l).cons _ _ _ }
end
theorem lookup_all_length_le_one (a : α) {l : list (sigma β)} (h : l.nodupkeys) :
length (lookup_all a l) ≤ 1 :=
by have := nodup_of_sublist ((lookup_all_sublist a l).map _) h;
rw map_map at this; rwa [← nodup_repeat, ← map_const _ a]
theorem lookup_all_eq_lookup (a : α) {l : list (sigma β)} (h : l.nodupkeys) :
lookup_all a l = (lookup a l).to_list :=
begin
rw ← head_lookup_all,
have := lookup_all_length_le_one a h, revert this,
rcases lookup_all a l with _|⟨b, _|⟨c, l⟩⟩; intro; try {refl},
exact absurd this dec_trivial
end
theorem lookup_all_nodup (a : α) {l : list (sigma β)} (h : l.nodupkeys) :
(lookup_all a l).nodup :=
by rw lookup_all_eq_lookup a h; apply option.to_list_nodup
theorem perm_lookup_all (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : list (sigma β)}
(nd₁ : l₁.nodupkeys) (nd₂ : l₂.nodupkeys) (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : lookup_all a l₁ = lookup_all a l₂ :=
by simp [lookup_all_eq_lookup, nd₁, nd₂, perm_lookup a nd₁ nd₂ p]
/-! ### `kreplace` -/
/-- Replaces the first value with key `a` by `b`. -/
def kreplace (a : α) (b : β a) : list (sigma β) → list (sigma β) :=
lookmap $ λ s, if a = s.1 then some ⟨a, b⟩ else none
theorem kreplace_of_forall_not (a : α) (b : β a) {l : list (sigma β)}
(H : ∀ b : β a, sigma.mk a b ∉ l) : kreplace a b l = l :=
lookmap_of_forall_not _ $ begin
rintro ⟨a', b'⟩ h, dsimp, split_ifs,
{ subst a', exact H _ h }, {refl}
end
theorem kreplace_self {a : α} {b : β a} {l : list (sigma β)}
(nd : nodupkeys l) (h : sigma.mk a b ∈ l) : kreplace a b l = l :=
begin
refine (lookmap_congr _).trans
(lookmap_id' (option.guard (λ s, a = s.1)) _ _),
{ rintro ⟨a', b'⟩ h', dsimp [option.guard], split_ifs,
{ subst a', exact ⟨rfl, heq_of_eq $ nd.eq_of_mk_mem h h'⟩ },
{ refl } },
{ rintro ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩, dsimp [option.guard], split_ifs,
{ subst a₁, rintro ⟨⟩, simp }, { rintro ⟨⟩ } },
end
theorem keys_kreplace (a : α) (b : β a) : ∀ l : list (sigma β),
(kreplace a b l).keys = l.keys :=
lookmap_map_eq _ _ $ by rintro ⟨a₁, b₂⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩;
dsimp; split_ifs; simp [h] {contextual := tt}
theorem kreplace_nodupkeys (a : α) (b : β a) {l : list (sigma β)} :
(kreplace a b l).nodupkeys ↔ l.nodupkeys :=
by simp [nodupkeys, keys_kreplace]
theorem perm.kreplace {a : α} {b : β a} {l₁ l₂ : list (sigma β)}
(nd : l₁.nodupkeys) : l₁ ~ l₂ →
kreplace a b l₁ ~ kreplace a b l₂ :=
perm_lookmap _ $ begin
refine nd.pairwise_ne.imp _,
intros x y h z h₁ w h₂,
split_ifs at h₁ h₂; cases h₁; cases h₂,
exact (h (h_2.symm.trans h_1)).elim
end
/-! ### `kerase` -/
/-- Remove the first pair with the key `a`. -/
def kerase (a : α) : list (sigma β) → list (sigma β) :=
erasep $ λ s, a = s.1
@[simp] theorem kerase_nil {a} : @kerase _ β _ a [] = [] :=
rfl
@[simp, priority 990]
theorem kerase_cons_eq {a} {s : sigma β} {l : list (sigma β)} (h : a = s.1) :
kerase a (s :: l) = l :=
by simp [kerase, h]
@[simp, priority 990]
theorem kerase_cons_ne {a} {s : sigma β} {l : list (sigma β)} (h : a ≠ s.1) :
kerase a (s :: l) = s :: kerase a l :=
by simp [kerase, h]
@[simp, priority 980]
theorem kerase_of_not_mem_keys {a} {l : list (sigma β)} (h : a ∉ l.keys) :
kerase a l = l :=
by induction l with _ _ ih;
[refl, { simp [not_or_distrib] at h, simp [h.1, ih h.2] }]
theorem kerase_sublist (a : α) (l : list (sigma β)) : kerase a l <+ l :=
erasep_sublist _
theorem kerase_keys_subset (a) (l : list (sigma β)) :
(kerase a l).keys ⊆ l.keys :=
((kerase_sublist a l).map _).subset
theorem mem_keys_of_mem_keys_kerase {a₁ a₂} {l : list (sigma β)} :
a₁ ∈ (kerase a₂ l).keys → a₁ ∈ l.keys :=
@kerase_keys_subset _ _ _ _ _ _
theorem exists_of_kerase {a : α} {l : list (sigma β)} (h : a ∈ l.keys) :
∃ (b : β a) (l₁ l₂ : list (sigma β)),
a ∉ l₁.keys ∧
l = l₁ ++ ⟨a, b⟩ :: l₂ ∧
kerase a l = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
begin
induction l,
case list.nil { cases h },
case list.cons : hd tl ih
{ by_cases e : a = hd.1,
{ subst e,
exact ⟨hd.2, [], tl, by simp, by cases hd; refl, by simp⟩ },
{ simp at h,
cases h,
case or.inl : h { exact absurd h e },
case or.inr : h
{ rcases ih h with ⟨b, tl₁, tl₂, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩,
exact ⟨b, hd :: tl₁, tl₂, not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem e h₁,
by rw h₂; refl, by simp [e, h₃]⟩ } } }
end
@[simp, priority 990]
theorem mem_keys_kerase_of_ne {a₁ a₂} {l : list (sigma β)} (h : a₁ ≠ a₂) :
a₁ ∈ (kerase a₂ l).keys ↔ a₁ ∈ l.keys :=
iff.intro mem_keys_of_mem_keys_kerase $ λ p,
if q : a₂ ∈ l.keys then
match l, kerase a₂ l, exists_of_kerase q, p with
| _, _, ⟨_, _, _, _, rfl, rfl⟩, p := by simpa [keys, h] using p
end
else
by simp [q, p]
theorem keys_kerase {a} {l : list (sigma β)} : (kerase a l).keys = l.keys.erase a :=
by rw [keys, kerase, ←erasep_map sigma.fst l, erase_eq_erasep]
theorem kerase_kerase {a a'} {l : list (sigma β)} :
(kerase a' l).kerase a = (kerase a l).kerase a' :=
begin
by_cases a = a',
{ subst a' },
induction l with x xs, { refl },
{ by_cases a' = x.1,
{ subst a', simp [kerase_cons_ne h,kerase_cons_eq rfl] },
by_cases h' : a = x.1,
{ subst a, simp [kerase_cons_eq rfl,kerase_cons_ne (ne.symm h)] },
{ simp [kerase_cons_ne,*] } }
end
theorem kerase_nodupkeys (a : α) {l : list (sigma β)} : nodupkeys l → (kerase a l).nodupkeys :=
nodupkeys_of_sublist $ kerase_sublist _ _
theorem perm.kerase {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : list (sigma β)}
(nd : l₁.nodupkeys) : l₁ ~ l₂ → kerase a l₁ ~ kerase a l₂ :=
perm.erasep _ $ (nodupkeys_iff_pairwise.1 nd).imp $
by rintro x y h rfl; exact h
@[simp] theorem not_mem_keys_kerase (a) {l : list (sigma β)} (nd : l.nodupkeys) :
a ∉ (kerase a l).keys :=
begin
induction l,
case list.nil { simp },
case list.cons : hd tl ih
{ simp at nd,
by_cases h : a = hd.1,
{ subst h, simp [nd.1] },
{ simp [h, ih nd.2] } }
end
@[simp] theorem lookup_kerase (a) {l : list (sigma β)} (nd : l.nodupkeys) :
lookup a (kerase a l) = none :=
lookup_eq_none.mpr (not_mem_keys_kerase a nd)
@[simp] theorem lookup_kerase_ne {a a'} {l : list (sigma β)} (h : a ≠ a') :
lookup a (kerase a' l) = lookup a l :=
begin
induction l,
case list.nil { refl },
case list.cons : hd tl ih
{ cases hd with ah bh,
by_cases h₁ : a = ah; by_cases h₂ : a' = ah,
{ substs h₁ h₂, cases ne.irrefl h },
{ subst h₁, simp [h₂] },
{ subst h₂, simp [h] },
{ simp [h₁, h₂, ih] } }
end
theorem kerase_append_left {a} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list (sigma β)},
a ∈ l₁.keys → kerase a (l₁ ++ l₂) = kerase a l₁ ++ l₂
| [] _ h := by cases h
| (s :: l₁) l₂ h₁ :=
if h₂ : a = s.1 then
by simp [h₂]
else
by simp at h₁;
cases h₁;
[exact absurd h₁ h₂, simp [h₂, kerase_append_left h₁]]
theorem kerase_append_right {a} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list (sigma β)},
a ∉ l₁.keys → kerase a (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ++ kerase a l₂
| [] _ h := rfl
| (_ :: l₁) l₂ h := by simp [not_or_distrib] at h;
simp [h.1, kerase_append_right h.2]
theorem kerase_comm (a₁ a₂) (l : list (sigma β)) :
kerase a₂ (kerase a₁ l) = kerase a₁ (kerase a₂ l) :=
if h : a₁ = a₂ then
by simp [h]
else if ha₁ : a₁ ∈ l.keys then
if ha₂ : a₂ ∈ l.keys then
match l, kerase a₁ l, exists_of_kerase ha₁, ha₂ with
| _, _, ⟨b₁, l₁, l₂, a₁_nin_l₁, rfl, rfl⟩, a₂_in_l₁_app_l₂ :=
if h' : a₂ ∈ l₁.keys then
by simp [kerase_append_left h',
kerase_append_right (mt (mem_keys_kerase_of_ne h).mp a₁_nin_l₁)]
else
by simp [kerase_append_right h', kerase_append_right a₁_nin_l₁,
@kerase_cons_ne _ _ _ a₂ ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ _ (ne.symm h)]
end
else
by simp [ha₂, mt mem_keys_of_mem_keys_kerase ha₂]
else
by simp [ha₁, mt mem_keys_of_mem_keys_kerase ha₁]
lemma sizeof_kerase {α} {β : α → Type*} [decidable_eq α] [has_sizeof (sigma β)] (x : α)
(xs : list (sigma β)) :
sizeof (list.kerase x xs) ≤ sizeof xs :=
begin
unfold_wf,
induction xs with y ys,
{ simp },
{ by_cases x = y.1; simp [*, list.sizeof] },
end
/-! ### `kinsert` -/
/-- Insert the pair `⟨a, b⟩` and erase the first pair with the key `a`. -/
def kinsert (a : α) (b : β a) (l : list (sigma β)) : list (sigma β) :=
⟨a, b⟩ :: kerase a l
@[simp] theorem kinsert_def {a} {b : β a} {l : list (sigma β)} :
kinsert a b l = ⟨a, b⟩ :: kerase a l := rfl
theorem mem_keys_kinsert {a a'} {b' : β a'} {l : list (sigma β)} :
a ∈ (kinsert a' b' l).keys ↔ a = a' ∨ a ∈ l.keys :=
by by_cases h : a = a'; simp [h]
theorem kinsert_nodupkeys (a) (b : β a) {l : list (sigma β)} (nd : l.nodupkeys) :
(kinsert a b l).nodupkeys :=
nodupkeys_cons.mpr ⟨not_mem_keys_kerase a nd, kerase_nodupkeys a nd⟩
theorem perm.kinsert {a} {b : β a} {l₁ l₂ : list (sigma β)} (nd₁ : l₁.nodupkeys)
(p : l₁ ~ l₂) : kinsert a b l₁ ~ kinsert a b l₂ :=
(p.kerase nd₁).cons _
theorem lookup_kinsert {a} {b : β a} (l : list (sigma β)) :
lookup a (kinsert a b l) = some b :=
by simp only [kinsert, lookup_cons_eq]
theorem lookup_kinsert_ne {a a'} {b' : β a'} {l : list (sigma β)} (h : a ≠ a') :
lookup a (kinsert a' b' l) = lookup a l :=
by simp [h]
/-! ### `kextract` -/
/-- Finds the first entry with a given key `a` and returns its value (as an `option` because there
might be no entry with key `a`) alongside with the rest of the entries. -/
def kextract (a : α) : list (sigma β) → option (β a) × list (sigma β)
| [] := (none, [])
| (s::l) := if h : s.1 = a then (some (eq.rec_on h s.2), l) else
let (b', l') := kextract l in (b', s :: l')
@[simp] theorem kextract_eq_lookup_kerase (a : α) :
∀ l : list (sigma β), kextract a l = (lookup a l, kerase a l)
| [] := rfl
| (⟨a', b⟩::l) := begin
simp [kextract], dsimp, split_ifs,
{ subst a', simp [kerase] },
{ simp [kextract, ne.symm h, kextract_eq_lookup_kerase l, kerase] }
end
/-! ### `erase_dupkeys` -/
/-- Remove entries with duplicate keys from `l : list (sigma β)`. -/
def erase_dupkeys : list (sigma β) → list (sigma β) :=
list.foldr (λ x, kinsert x.1 x.2) []
lemma erase_dupkeys_cons {x : sigma β} (l : list (sigma β)) :
erase_dupkeys (x :: l) = kinsert x.1 x.2 (erase_dupkeys l) := rfl
lemma nodupkeys_erase_dupkeys (l : list (sigma β)) : nodupkeys (erase_dupkeys l) :=
begin
dsimp [erase_dupkeys], generalize hl : nil = l',
have : nodupkeys l', { rw ← hl, apply nodup_nil },
clear hl,
induction l with x xs,
{ apply this },
{ cases x, simp [erase_dupkeys], split,
{ simp [keys_kerase], apply mem_erase_of_nodup l_ih },
apply kerase_nodupkeys _ l_ih, }
end
lemma lookup_erase_dupkeys (a : α) (l : list (sigma β)) : lookup a (erase_dupkeys l) = lookup a l :=
begin
induction l, refl,
cases l_hd with a' b,
by_cases a = a',
{ subst a', rw [erase_dupkeys_cons,lookup_kinsert,lookup_cons_eq] },
{ rw [erase_dupkeys_cons,lookup_kinsert_ne h,l_ih,lookup_cons_ne], exact h },
end
lemma sizeof_erase_dupkeys {α} {β : α → Type*} [decidable_eq α] [has_sizeof (sigma β)]
(xs : list (sigma β)) :
sizeof (list.erase_dupkeys xs) ≤ sizeof xs :=
begin
unfold_wf,
induction xs with x xs,
{ simp [list.erase_dupkeys] },
{ simp only [erase_dupkeys_cons, list.sizeof, kinsert_def, add_le_add_iff_left, sigma.eta],
transitivity, apply sizeof_kerase,
assumption }
end
/-! ### `kunion` -/
/-- `kunion l₁ l₂` is the append to l₁ of l₂ after, for each key in l₁, the
first matching pair in l₂ is erased. -/
def kunion : list (sigma β) → list (sigma β) → list (sigma β)
| [] l₂ := l₂
| (s :: l₁) l₂ := s :: kunion l₁ (kerase s.1 l₂)
@[simp] theorem nil_kunion {l : list (sigma β)} : kunion [] l = l :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem kunion_nil : ∀ {l : list (sigma β)}, kunion l [] = l
| [] := rfl
| (_ :: l) := by rw [kunion, kerase_nil, kunion_nil]
@[simp] theorem kunion_cons {s} {l₁ l₂ : list (sigma β)} :
kunion (s :: l₁) l₂ = s :: kunion l₁ (kerase s.1 l₂) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_keys_kunion {a} {l₁ l₂ : list (sigma β)} :
a ∈ (kunion l₁ l₂).keys ↔ a ∈ l₁.keys ∨ a ∈ l₂.keys :=
begin
induction l₁ generalizing l₂,
case list.nil { simp },
case list.cons : s l₁ ih { by_cases h : a = s.1; [simp [h], simp [h, ih]] }
end
@[simp] theorem kunion_kerase {a} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : list (sigma β)},
kunion (kerase a l₁) (kerase a l₂) = kerase a (kunion l₁ l₂)
| [] _ := rfl
| (s :: _) l := by by_cases h : a = s.1;
simp [h, kerase_comm a s.1 l, kunion_kerase]
theorem kunion_nodupkeys {l₁ l₂ : list (sigma β)}
(nd₁ : l₁.nodupkeys) (nd₂ : l₂.nodupkeys) : (kunion l₁ l₂).nodupkeys :=
begin
induction l₁ generalizing l₂,
case list.nil { simp only [nil_kunion, nd₂] },
case list.cons : s l₁ ih
{ simp at nd₁,
simp [not_or_distrib, nd₁.1, nd₂, ih nd₁.2 (kerase_nodupkeys s.1 nd₂)] }
end
theorem perm.kunion_right {l₁ l₂ : list (sigma β)} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) (l) :
kunion l₁ l ~ kunion l₂ l :=
begin
induction p generalizing l,
case list.perm.nil { refl },
case list.perm.cons : hd tl₁ tl₂ p ih
{ simp [ih (kerase hd.1 l), perm.cons] },
case list.perm.swap : s₁ s₂ l
{ simp [kerase_comm, perm.swap] },
case list.perm.trans : l₁ l₂ l₃ p₁₂ p₂₃ ih₁₂ ih₂₃
{ exact perm.trans (ih₁₂ l) (ih₂₃ l) }
end
theorem perm.kunion_left : ∀ l {l₁ l₂ : list (sigma β)},
l₁.nodupkeys → l₁ ~ l₂ → kunion l l₁ ~ kunion l l₂
| [] _ _ _ p := p
| (s :: l) l₁ l₂ nd₁ p :=
by simp [((p.kerase nd₁).kunion_left l (kerase_nodupkeys s.1 nd₁)).cons s]
theorem perm.kunion {l₁ l₂ l₃ l₄ : list (sigma β)} (nd₃ : l₃.nodupkeys)
(p₁₂ : l₁ ~ l₂) (p₃₄ : l₃ ~ l₄) : kunion l₁ l₃ ~ kunion l₂ l₄ :=
(p₁₂.kunion_right l₃).trans (p₃₄.kunion_left l₂ nd₃)
@[simp] theorem lookup_kunion_left {a} {l₁ l₂ : list (sigma β)} (h : a ∈ l₁.keys) :
lookup a (kunion l₁ l₂) = lookup a l₁ :=
begin
induction l₁ with s _ ih generalizing l₂; simp at h; cases h; cases s with a',
{ subst h, simp },
{ rw kunion_cons,
by_cases h' : a = a',
{ subst h', simp },
{ simp [h', ih h] } }
end
@[simp] theorem lookup_kunion_right {a} {l₁ l₂ : list (sigma β)} (h : a ∉ l₁.keys) :
lookup a (kunion l₁ l₂) = lookup a l₂ :=
begin
induction l₁ generalizing l₂,
case list.nil { simp },
case list.cons : _ _ ih { simp [not_or_distrib] at h, simp [h.1, ih h.2] }
end
@[simp] theorem mem_lookup_kunion {a} {b : β a} {l₁ l₂ : list (sigma β)} :
b ∈ lookup a (kunion l₁ l₂) ↔ b ∈ lookup a l₁ ∨ a ∉ l₁.keys ∧ b ∈ lookup a l₂ :=
begin
induction l₁ generalizing l₂,
case list.nil { simp },
case list.cons : s _ ih
{ cases s with a',
by_cases h₁ : a = a',
{ subst h₁, simp },
{ let h₂ := @ih (kerase a' l₂), simp [h₁] at h₂, simp [h₁, h₂] } }
end
theorem mem_lookup_kunion_middle {a} {b : β a} {l₁ l₂ l₃ : list (sigma β)}
(h₁ : b ∈ lookup a (kunion l₁ l₃)) (h₂ : a ∉ keys l₂) :
b ∈ lookup a (kunion (kunion l₁ l₂) l₃) :=
match mem_lookup_kunion.mp h₁ with
| or.inl h := mem_lookup_kunion.mpr (or.inl (mem_lookup_kunion.mpr (or.inl h)))
| or.inr h := mem_lookup_kunion.mpr $
or.inr ⟨mt mem_keys_kunion.mp (not_or_distrib.mpr ⟨h.1, h₂⟩), h.2⟩
end
end list
|
8269e0382e5661771e71d8a067de3fea63ef0715 | 5bf112cf7101c6c6303dc3fd0b3179c860e61e56 | /lean/problems/combinatorics/imo_2018_sl.lean | e05417f6193efe8428002f0d602aede30e4d84cd | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | fredfeng/formal-encoding | 7ab645f49a553dfad2af03fcb4289e40fc679759 | 024efcf58672ac6b817caa10dfe8cd9708b07f1b | refs/heads/master | 1,597,236,551,123 | 1,568,832,149,000 | 1,568,832,149,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,634 | lean | import background
namespace IMOGrandChallenge
namespace Problems
namespace Combinatorics
def IMO_2018_SL_C1 : Prop :=
-- note: current formulation builds in the symmetry that WLOG `S₁.card = m`
-- better to follow the question's wording more closely?
∀ (n : ℕ), n ≥ 3 →
∃ (S : FiniteSet ℕgt0), S.card = 2 * n ∧
∀ (m : ℕ), m ≥ 2 → m ≤ n →
∃ (S₁ S₂ : FiniteSet ℕgt0), partitions S [S₁, S₂] ∧ S₁.sum = S₂.sum ∧ S₁.card = m
def IMO_2018_SL_C2 : Type :=
-- original problem: two-player discrete-time finite-state game.
-- goal is to find maximal `K` s.t. `P(K)` no matter how P2 plays
-- design: this is a new kind of discrete transition system, that is now multi-agent
-- will reassess design after seeing a few more combinatorics problems
-- note: problem presupposes knowledge of chess!
let Square : Type := Option Bool;
let horst := 0;
let queenie := 1;
let empty := none;
let blackKnight := some false;
let whiteQueen := some true;
-- TODO(dselsam): this abstraction does not exist yet and may never exist
let game : TurnBasedGame := {
State := Grid Square 20 20,
Action := Fin 20 × Fin 20,
nPlayers := 2,
legalAction := λ s₁ player a₁ =>
s₁[a₁] == empty ∧
(player == queenie ∨ ¬ ∃ a₂, s₁[a₂] == blackKnight ∧ multisetEq [abs (a₁.1 - a₂.1), abs (a₁.2 - a₂.2)] [1, 2]);
takeAction := λ s₁ player a₁ =>
s₁[a₁] = if player == horst then blackKnight else whiteQueen;
};
SKIP
def IMO_2018_SL_C3 : Prop :=
-- original problem: one-player discrete-time finite-state game that depends on `n`.
-- goal is to prove P1 cannot win in less than P(n) moves
-- design: this is a standard discrete transition system
SKIP
def IMO_2018_SL_C4 : Prop :=
-- note: put triangle in standard library
-- note: generalization of 'distinct' must be in standard library
-- note: decide must be constructive, i.e. not use excluded middle
-- note: this is technically a SAT problem
let Triangle : ℕ → Type := ∀ (n : ℕgt0) (k : Fin n), Fin k → ℤ;
let antiPascal : ∀ (n : ℕ), Set (Triangle n) :=
λ (n : ℕ) (tri : Triangle) => ∀ (k : Fin n), k < n-1 → ∀ (i : Fin k), tri k i = abs (tri (k+1) i - tri (k+1) (i+1)),
let distinctEntries : ∀ (n : ℕ), Set (Triangle n) :=
λ (tri : Triangle) => distinct (λ (z : ℤ) => ∃ (k : Fin n) (i : Fin k), z = tri k i);
decide (empty (antiPascal 2018 ∩ distinctEntries 2018))
def IMO_2018_SL_C5 :
-- note: the `(k choose 2)` is not stated in the original problem
-- (seems like acceptable hint, especially since it is basically the definition of `choose`)
-- note: `legal` is not explicit in the question
-- note: this one doesn't seem to require a transition system (nor did the last one)
∀ (k : ℕgt0),
let nPlayers : ℕgt0 := 2 * k;
let nGames : ℕgt0 := k.choose 2;
let Schedule : Type :=
Fin nGames → Fin nPlayers × Fin nPlayers;
let legal : Schedule → Prop := λ (s : Schedule) =>
∀ i, (s i).fst ≠ (s i).snd;
let gamesPlayed : Schedule → Fin nPlayers → List (Fin nGames) := λ s p =>
(List.rangeFin nGames).filterMap (λ game => (s game).fst == p || (s game).snd == p);
let cost : Schedule → ℕ := λ s =>
((List.rangeFin nPlayers).map (λ p => gamesPlayed.head - gamesPlayed.last)).sum;
∀ (s : Schedule),
compute $ min legal cost
def IMO_2018_SL_C6 :
-- note: would be nice to define recursive functions with `let`
-- note: might want to use generic DTS formulation for this
-- note: times₂ builds in that legalMove₁ & legalMove₂ are exclusive
∀ (a b : ℕgt0), a ≠ b →
let State : Type := List ℕ;
let s₀ : State := [];
let legalMove₁ : State → State → Prop := λ (s₁ s₂ : State) =>
∃ (i j : Fin Sk.length), i ≠ j ∧ s₁.get i = s₁.get j ∧ s₂ = (s₁.updateAt i (λ x => x + a)).updateAt j (λ x => x + b);
let legalMove₂ : State → State → Prop := λ (s₁ s₂ : State) =>
(¬ ∃ (i j : Fin Sk.length), i ≠ j ∧ s₁.get i = s₁.get j) ∧ s₂ = 0::0::s₁;
let legalMove : State → State → Prop := λ (s₁ s₂ : State) => legalMove₁ s₁ s₂ ∨ legalMove₂ s₁ s₂;
let Trajectory : Type := ℕ → State;
let possible : Trajectory → Prop := λ t => t 0 = s₀ ∧ ∀ i, legalMove (t i) (t (i+1));
let times₂ : Trajectory → Set ℕ := λ t n => legalMove₂ (t n) (t $ n+1);
∀ (t : Trajectory), possible t → finite (times₂ t)
def IMO_2018_SL_C7 : Prop :=
-- TODO: this one involves basic Geo, return to it later
SORRY
end Combinatorics
end Problems
end IMOGrandChallenge
|
4f28e970a1885e80d9d568c306d29d81758d7e26 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/algebra/char_zero/defs.lean | b816a3933863221d63392d4788a2f179b387bb29 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,858 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.int.cast.defs
/-!
# Characteristic zero
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
A ring `R` is called of characteristic zero if every natural number `n` is non-zero when considered
as an element of `R`. Since this definition doesn't mention the multiplicative structure of `R`
except for the existence of `1` in this file characteristic zero is defined for additive monoids
with `1`.
## Main definition
`char_zero` is the typeclass of an additive monoid with one such that the natural homomorphism
from the natural numbers into it is injective.
## TODO
* Unify with `char_p` (possibly using an out-parameter)
-/
/-- Typeclass for monoids with characteristic zero.
(This is usually stated on fields but it makes sense for any additive monoid with 1.)
*Warning*: for a semiring `R`, `char_zero R` and `char_p R 0` need not coincide.
* `char_zero R` requires an injection `ℕ ↪ R`;
* `char_p R 0` asks that only `0 : ℕ` maps to `0 : R` under the map `ℕ → R`.
For instance, endowing `{0, 1}` with addition given by `max` (i.e. `1` is absorbing), shows that
`char_zero {0, 1}` does not hold and yet `char_p {0, 1} 0` does.
This example is formalized in `counterexamples/char_p_zero_ne_char_zero`.
-/
class char_zero (R : Type*) [add_monoid_with_one R] : Prop :=
(cast_injective : function.injective (coe : ℕ → R))
theorem char_zero_of_inj_zero {R : Type*} [add_group_with_one R]
(H : ∀ n:ℕ, (n:R) = 0 → n = 0) : char_zero R :=
⟨λ m n h, begin
induction m with m ih generalizing n, { rw H n, rw [← h, nat.cast_zero] },
cases n with n, { apply H, rw [h, nat.cast_zero], },
simp_rw [nat.cast_succ, add_right_cancel_iff] at h, rwa ih,
end⟩
namespace nat
variables {R : Type*} [add_monoid_with_one R] [char_zero R]
theorem cast_injective : function.injective (coe : ℕ → R) :=
char_zero.cast_injective
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_inj {m n : ℕ} : (m : R) = n ↔ m = n :=
cast_injective.eq_iff
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_eq_zero {n : ℕ} : (n : R) = 0 ↔ n = 0 :=
by rw [← cast_zero, cast_inj]
@[norm_cast] theorem cast_ne_zero {n : ℕ} : (n : R) ≠ 0 ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
not_congr cast_eq_zero
lemma cast_add_one_ne_zero (n : ℕ) : (n + 1 : R) ≠ 0 :=
by exact_mod_cast n.succ_ne_zero
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_eq_one {n : ℕ} : (n : R) = 1 ↔ n = 1 :=
by rw [←cast_one, cast_inj]
@[norm_cast] theorem cast_ne_one {n : ℕ} : (n : R) ≠ 1 ↔ n ≠ 1 :=
cast_eq_one.not
end nat
namespace ne_zero
instance char_zero {M} {n : ℕ}
[ne_zero n] [add_monoid_with_one M] [char_zero M] : ne_zero (n : M) :=
⟨nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr out⟩
end ne_zero
|
8e9dbd29e8ebc2f4f6223a8784497de4e5c1e5ef | 28be2ab6091504b6ba250b367205fb94d50ab284 | /src/game/world8/level10.lean | 70098c440d5c9f5283e096d4aa5cea605f03daa5 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | postmasters/natural_number_game | 87304ac22e5e1c5ac2382d6e523d6914dd67a92d | 38a7adcdfdb18c49c87b37831736c8f15300d821 | refs/heads/master | 1,649,856,819,031 | 1,586,444,676,000 | 1,586,444,676,000 | 255,006,061 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,586,664,599,000 | 1,586,664,598,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,991 | lean | import game.world8.level9 -- hide
namespace mynat -- hide
/-
# Advanced Addition World
## Level 10: `add_left_eq_zero`
## Important: the definition of `≠`
In Lean, `a ≠ b` is *defined to mean* `(a = b) → false`.
This means that if you see `a ≠ b` you can *literally treat
it as saying* `(a = b) → false`. Computer scientists would
say that these two terms are *definitionally equal*.
The following lemma, $a+b=0\implies b=0$, will be useful in inequality world.
Let me go through the proof, because it introduces several new
concepts:
* `cases b` with `b : mynat`
* `exfalso`
* `apply succ_ne_zero`
We're going to prove $a+b=0\implies b=0$. Here is the
strategy. Each natural number is either `0` or `succ(d)` for
some other natural number `d`. So we can start the proof
with
`cases b with d,`
and then we have two goals, the case `b = 0` (which you can solve easily)
and the case `b = succ(d)`, which looks like this:
```
a d : mynat,
H : a + succ d = 0
⊢ succ d = 0
```
Our goal is impossible to prove. However our hypothesis `H`
is also impossible, meaning that we still have a chance!
First let's see why `H` is impossible. We can
`rw add_succ at H,`
to turn `H` into `H : succ (a + d) = 0`. Because
`succ_ne_zero (a + d)` is a proof that `succ (a + d) ≠ 0`,
it is also a proof of the implication `succ (a + d) = 0 → false`.
Hence `succ_ne_zero (a + d) H` is a proof of `false`!
Unfortunately our goal is not `false`, it's a generic
false statement.
Recall however that the `exfalso` command turns any goal into `false`
(it's logically OK because `false` implies every proposition, true or false).
You can probably take it from here.
-/
/- Lemma
If $a$ and $b$ are natural numbers such that
$$ a + b = 0, $$
then $b = 0$.
-/
lemma add_left_eq_zero {{a b : mynat}} (H : a + b = 0) : b = 0 :=
begin [nat_num_game]
cases b with d,
{ refl},
{ rw add_succ at H,
exfalso,
apply succ_ne_zero (a + d),
exact H,
},
end
end mynat -- hide
|
cdf5a6c6041022fe8273d9d71b6be228b713ed21 | b2fe74b11b57d362c13326bc5651244f111fa6f4 | /src/algebra/big_operators/basic.lean | f13a117f93c60ef334763b00f1538486e400a3c9 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | midfield/mathlib | c4db5fa898b5ac8f2f80ae0d00c95eb6f745f4c7 | 775edc615ecec631d65b6180dbcc7bc26c3abc26 | refs/heads/master | 1,675,330,551,921 | 1,608,304,514,000 | 1,608,304,514,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 49,307 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import data.finset.fold
import data.equiv.mul_add
import tactic.abel
/-!
# Big operators
In this file we define products and sums indexed by finite sets (specifically, `finset`).
## Notation
We introduce the following notation, localized in `big_operators`.
To enable the notation, use `open_locale big_operators`.
Let `s` be a `finset α`, and `f : α → β` a function.
* `∏ x in s, f x` is notation for `finset.prod s f` (assuming `β` is a `comm_monoid`)
* `∑ x in s, f x` is notation for `finset.sum s f` (assuming `β` is an `add_comm_monoid`)
* `∏ x, f x` is notation for `finset.prod finset.univ f`
(assuming `α` is a `fintype` and `β` is a `comm_monoid`)
* `∑ x, f x` is notation for `finset.sum finset.univ f`
(assuming `α` is a `fintype` and `β` is an `add_comm_monoid`)
-/
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
namespace finset
/--
`∏ x in s, f x` is the product of `f x`
as `x` ranges over the elements of the finite set `s`.
-/
@[to_additive "`∑ x in s, f` is the sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements
of the finite set `s`."]
protected def prod [comm_monoid β] (s : finset α) (f : α → β) : β := (s.1.map f).prod
@[simp, to_additive] lemma prod_mk [comm_monoid β] (s : multiset α) (hs) (f : α → β) :
(⟨s, hs⟩ : finset α).prod f = (s.map f).prod :=
rfl
end finset
/-
## Operator precedence of `∏` and `∑`
There is no established mathematical convention
for the operator precedence of big operators like `∏` and `∑`.
We will have to make a choice.
Online discussions, such as https://math.stackexchange.com/q/185538/30839
seem to suggest that `∏` and `∑` should have the same precedence,
and that this should be somewhere between `*` and `+`.
The latter have precedence levels `70` and `65` respectively,
and we therefore choose the level `67`.
In practice, this means that parentheses should be placed as follows:
```lean
∑ k in K, (a k + b k) = ∑ k in K, a k + ∑ k in K, b k →
∏ k in K, a k * b k = (∏ k in K, a k) * (∏ k in K, b k)
```
(Example taken from page 490 of Knuth's *Concrete Mathematics*.)
-/
localized "notation `∑` binders `, ` r:(scoped:67 f, finset.sum finset.univ f) := r"
in big_operators
localized "notation `∏` binders `, ` r:(scoped:67 f, finset.prod finset.univ f) := r"
in big_operators
localized "notation `∑` binders ` in ` s `, ` r:(scoped:67 f, finset.sum s f) := r"
in big_operators
localized "notation `∏` binders ` in ` s `, ` r:(scoped:67 f, finset.prod s f) := r"
in big_operators
open_locale big_operators
namespace finset
variables {s s₁ s₂ : finset α} {a : α} {f g : α → β}
@[to_additive] lemma prod_eq_multiset_prod [comm_monoid β] (s : finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ x in s, f x = (s.1.map f).prod := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_fold [comm_monoid β] (s : finset α) (f : α → β) :
(∏ x in s, f x) = s.fold (*) 1 f :=
rfl
end finset
@[to_additive]
lemma monoid_hom.map_prod [comm_monoid β] [comm_monoid γ] (g : β →* γ) (f : α → β) (s : finset α) :
g (∏ x in s, f x) = ∏ x in s, g (f x) :=
by simp only [finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod, g.map_multiset_prod, multiset.map_map]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_equiv.map_prod [comm_monoid β] [comm_monoid γ] (g : β ≃* γ) (f : α → β) (s : finset α) :
g (∏ x in s, f x) = ∏ x in s, g (f x) :=
g.to_monoid_hom.map_prod f s
lemma ring_hom.map_list_prod [semiring β] [semiring γ] (f : β →+* γ) (l : list β) :
f l.prod = (l.map f).prod :=
f.to_monoid_hom.map_list_prod l
lemma ring_hom.map_list_sum [semiring β] [semiring γ] (f : β →+* γ) (l : list β) :
f l.sum = (l.map f).sum :=
f.to_add_monoid_hom.map_list_sum l
lemma ring_hom.map_multiset_prod [comm_semiring β] [comm_semiring γ] (f : β →+* γ)
(s : multiset β) :
f s.prod = (s.map f).prod :=
f.to_monoid_hom.map_multiset_prod s
lemma ring_hom.map_multiset_sum [semiring β] [semiring γ] (f : β →+* γ) (s : multiset β) :
f s.sum = (s.map f).sum :=
f.to_add_monoid_hom.map_multiset_sum s
lemma ring_hom.map_prod [comm_semiring β] [comm_semiring γ] (g : β →+* γ) (f : α → β)
(s : finset α) :
g (∏ x in s, f x) = ∏ x in s, g (f x) :=
g.to_monoid_hom.map_prod f s
lemma ring_hom.map_sum [semiring β] [semiring γ]
(g : β →+* γ) (f : α → β) (s : finset α) :
g (∑ x in s, f x) = ∑ x in s, g (f x) :=
g.to_add_monoid_hom.map_sum f s
namespace finset
variables {s s₁ s₂ : finset α} {a : α} {f g : α → β}
section comm_monoid
variables [comm_monoid β]
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_empty {α : Type u} {f : α → β} : (∏ x in (∅:finset α), f x) = 1 := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_insert [decidable_eq α] :
a ∉ s → (∏ x in (insert a s), f x) = f a * ∏ x in s, f x := fold_insert
/--
The product of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the product over `s`, as long as `a` is in `s` or `f a = 1`.
-/
@[simp, to_additive "The sum of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the sum over `s`, as long as `a` is in `s` or `f a = 0`."]
lemma prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem [decidable_eq α] (h : a ∉ s → f a = 1) :
∏ x in insert a s, f x = ∏ x in s, f x :=
begin
by_cases hm : a ∈ s,
{ simp_rw insert_eq_of_mem hm },
{ rw [prod_insert hm, h hm, one_mul] },
end
/--
The product of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as the product over `s`, as long as `f a = 1`.
-/
@[simp, to_additive "The sum of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the sum over `s`, as long as `f a = 0`."]
lemma prod_insert_one [decidable_eq α] (h : f a = 1) :
∏ x in insert a s, f x = ∏ x in s, f x :=
prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem (λ _, h)
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_singleton : (∏ x in (singleton a), f x) = f a :=
eq.trans fold_singleton $ mul_one _
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_pair [decidable_eq α] {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) :
(∏ x in ({a, b} : finset α), f x) = f a * f b :=
by rw [prod_insert (not_mem_singleton.2 h), prod_singleton]
@[simp, priority 1100] lemma prod_const_one : (∏ x in s, (1 : β)) = 1 :=
by simp only [finset.prod, multiset.map_const, multiset.prod_repeat, one_pow]
@[simp, priority 1100] lemma sum_const_zero {β} {s : finset α} [add_comm_monoid β] :
(∑ x in s, (0 : β)) = 0 :=
@prod_const_one _ (multiplicative β) _ _
attribute [to_additive] prod_const_one
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_image [decidable_eq α] {s : finset γ} {g : γ → α} :
(∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, g x = g y → x = y) → (∏ x in (s.image g), f x) = ∏ x in s, f (g x) :=
fold_image
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_map (s : finset α) (e : α ↪ γ) (f : γ → β) :
(∏ x in (s.map e), f x) = ∏ x in s, f (e x) :=
by rw [finset.prod, finset.map_val, multiset.map_map]; refl
@[congr, to_additive]
lemma prod_congr (h : s₁ = s₂) : (∀x∈s₂, f x = g x) → s₁.prod f = s₂.prod g :=
by rw [h]; exact fold_congr
attribute [congr] finset.sum_congr
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_union_inter [decidable_eq α] :
(∏ x in (s₁ ∪ s₂), f x) * (∏ x in (s₁ ∩ s₂), f x) = (∏ x in s₁, f x) * (∏ x in s₂, f x) :=
fold_union_inter
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_union [decidable_eq α] (h : disjoint s₁ s₂) :
(∏ x in (s₁ ∪ s₂), f x) = (∏ x in s₁, f x) * (∏ x in s₂, f x) :=
by rw [←prod_union_inter, (disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mp h)]; exact (mul_one _).symm
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_sdiff [decidable_eq α] (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
(∏ x in (s₂ \ s₁), f x) * (∏ x in s₁, f x) = (∏ x in s₂, f x) :=
by rw [←prod_union sdiff_disjoint, sdiff_union_of_subset h]
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_sum_elim [decidable_eq (α ⊕ γ)]
(s : finset α) (t : finset γ) (f : α → β) (g : γ → β) :
∏ x in s.image sum.inl ∪ t.image sum.inr, sum.elim f g x = (∏ x in s, f x) * (∏ x in t, g x) :=
begin
rw [prod_union, prod_image, prod_image],
{ simp only [sum.elim_inl, sum.elim_inr] },
{ exact λ _ _ _ _, sum.inr.inj },
{ exact λ _ _ _ _, sum.inl.inj },
{ rintros i hi,
erw [finset.mem_inter, finset.mem_image, finset.mem_image] at hi,
rcases hi with ⟨⟨i, hi, rfl⟩, ⟨j, hj, H⟩⟩,
cases H }
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_bind [decidable_eq α] {s : finset γ} {t : γ → finset α} :
(∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → disjoint (t x) (t y)) →
(∏ x in (s.bind t), f x) = ∏ x in s, ∏ i in t x, f i :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq γ; exact
finset.induction_on s (λ _, by simp only [bind_empty, prod_empty])
(assume x s hxs ih hd,
have hd' : ∀x∈s, ∀y∈s, x ≠ y → disjoint (t x) (t y),
from assume _ hx _ hy, hd _ (mem_insert_of_mem hx) _ (mem_insert_of_mem hy),
have ∀y∈s, x ≠ y,
from assume _ hy h, by rw [←h] at hy; contradiction,
have ∀y∈s, disjoint (t x) (t y),
from assume _ hy, hd _ (mem_insert_self _ _) _ (mem_insert_of_mem hy) (this _ hy),
have disjoint (t x) (finset.bind s t),
from (disjoint_bind_right _ _ _).mpr this,
by simp only [bind_insert, prod_insert hxs, prod_union this, ih hd'])
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_product {s : finset γ} {t : finset α} {f : γ×α → β} :
(∏ x in s.product t, f x) = ∏ x in s, ∏ y in t, f (x, y) :=
begin
haveI := classical.dec_eq α, haveI := classical.dec_eq γ,
rw [product_eq_bind, prod_bind],
{ congr, funext, exact prod_image (λ _ _ _ _ H, (prod.mk.inj H).2) },
simp only [disjoint_iff_ne, mem_image],
rintros _ _ _ _ h ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ _,
apply h, cc
end
/-- An uncurried version of `prod_product`. -/
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_product' {s : finset γ} {t : finset α} {f : γ → α → β} :
(∏ x in s.product t, f x.1 x.2) = ∏ x in s, ∏ y in t, f x y :=
prod_product
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_sigma {σ : α → Type*}
{s : finset α} {t : Πa, finset (σ a)} {f : sigma σ → β} :
(∏ x in s.sigma t, f x) = ∏ a in s, ∏ s in (t a), f ⟨a, s⟩ :=
by classical;
calc (∏ x in s.sigma t, f x) =
∏ x in s.bind (λa, (t a).map (function.embedding.sigma_mk a)), f x : by rw sigma_eq_bind
... = ∏ a in s, ∏ x in (t a).map (function.embedding.sigma_mk a), f x :
prod_bind $ assume a₁ ha a₂ ha₂ h x hx,
by { simp only [inf_eq_inter, mem_inter, mem_map, function.embedding.sigma_mk_apply] at hx,
rcases hx with ⟨⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, ⟨z, hz, hz'⟩⟩, cc }
... = ∏ a in s, ∏ s in t a, f ⟨a, s⟩ :
prod_congr rfl $ λ _ _, prod_map _ _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to [decidable_eq γ] {s : finset α} {t : finset γ} {g : α → γ}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, g x ∈ t) (f : α → β) :
(∏ y in t, ∏ x in s.filter (λ x, g x = y), f x) = ∏ x in s, f x :=
begin
letI := classical.dec_eq α,
rw [← bind_filter_eq_of_maps_to h] {occs := occurrences.pos [2]},
refine (prod_bind $ λ x' hx y' hy hne, _).symm,
rw [disjoint_filter],
rintros x hx rfl,
exact hne
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_image' [decidable_eq α] {s : finset γ} {g : γ → α} (h : γ → β)
(eq : ∀c∈s, f (g c) = ∏ x in s.filter (λc', g c' = g c), h x) :
(∏ x in s.image g, f x) = ∏ x in s, h x :=
calc (∏ x in s.image g, f x) = ∏ x in s.image g, ∏ x in s.filter (λ c', g c' = x), h x :
prod_congr rfl $ λ x hx, let ⟨c, hcs, hc⟩ := mem_image.1 hx in hc ▸ (eq c hcs)
... = ∏ x in s, h x : prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to (λ x, mem_image_of_mem g) _
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_mul_distrib : ∏ x in s, (f x * g x) = (∏ x in s, f x) * (∏ x in s, g x) :=
eq.trans (by rw one_mul; refl) fold_op_distrib
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_comm {s : finset γ} {t : finset α} {f : γ → α → β} :
(∏ x in s, ∏ y in t, f x y) = (∏ y in t, ∏ x in s, f x y) :=
begin
classical,
apply finset.induction_on s,
{ simp only [prod_empty, prod_const_one] },
{ intros _ _ H ih,
simp only [prod_insert H, prod_mul_distrib, ih] }
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_hom [comm_monoid γ] (s : finset α) {f : α → β} (g : β → γ) [is_monoid_hom g] :
(∏ x in s, g (f x)) = g (∏ x in s, f x) :=
((monoid_hom.of g).map_prod f s).symm
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_hom_rel [comm_monoid γ] {r : β → γ → Prop} {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {s : finset α}
(h₁ : r 1 1) (h₂ : ∀a b c, r b c → r (f a * b) (g a * c)) : r (∏ x in s, f x) (∏ x in s, g x) :=
by { delta finset.prod, apply multiset.prod_hom_rel; assumption }
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_subset (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s₂, x ∉ s₁ → f x = 1) :
(∏ x in s₁, f x) = ∏ x in s₂, f x :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α; exact
have ∏ x in s₂ \ s₁, f x = ∏ x in s₂ \ s₁, 1,
from prod_congr rfl $ by simpa only [mem_sdiff, and_imp],
by rw [←prod_sdiff h]; simp only [this, prod_const_one, one_mul]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_filter_of_ne {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] (hp : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 1 → p x) :
(∏ x in (s.filter p), f x) = (∏ x in s, f x) :=
prod_subset (filter_subset _ _) $ λ x,
by { classical, rw [not_imp_comm, mem_filter], exact λ h₁ h₂, ⟨h₁, hp _ h₁ h₂⟩ }
-- If we use `[decidable_eq β]` here, some rewrites fail because they find a wrong `decidable`
-- instance first; `{∀x, decidable (f x ≠ 1)}` doesn't work with `rw ← prod_filter_ne_one`
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_filter_ne_one [∀ x, decidable (f x ≠ 1)] :
(∏ x in (s.filter $ λx, f x ≠ 1), f x) = (∏ x in s, f x) :=
prod_filter_of_ne $ λ _ _, id
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_filter (p : α → Prop) [decidable_pred p] (f : α → β) :
(∏ a in s.filter p, f a) = (∏ a in s, if p a then f a else 1) :=
calc (∏ a in s.filter p, f a) = ∏ a in s.filter p, if p a then f a else 1 :
prod_congr rfl (assume a h, by rw [if_pos (mem_filter.1 h).2])
... = ∏ a in s, if p a then f a else 1 :
begin
refine prod_subset (filter_subset _ s) (assume x hs h, _),
rw [mem_filter, not_and] at h,
exact if_neg (h hs)
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_eq_single {s : finset α} {f : α → β} (a : α)
(h₀ : ∀b∈s, b ≠ a → f b = 1) (h₁ : a ∉ s → f a = 1) : (∏ x in s, f x) = f a :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α;
from classical.by_cases
(assume : a ∈ s,
calc (∏ x in s, f x) = ∏ x in {a}, f x :
begin
refine (prod_subset _ _).symm,
{ intros _ H, rwa mem_singleton.1 H },
{ simpa only [mem_singleton] }
end
... = f a : prod_singleton)
(assume : a ∉ s,
(prod_congr rfl $ λ b hb, h₀ b hb $ by rintro rfl; cc).trans $
prod_const_one.trans (h₁ this).symm)
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_attach {f : α → β} : (∏ x in s.attach, f x) = (∏ x in s, f x) :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α; exact
calc (∏ x in s.attach, f x.val) = (∏ x in (s.attach).image subtype.val, f x) :
by rw [prod_image]; exact assume x _ y _, subtype.eq
... = _ : by rw [attach_image_val]
/-- A product over `s.subtype p` equals one over `s.filter p`. -/
@[simp, to_additive "A sum over `s.subtype p` equals one over `s.filter p`."]
lemma prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter (f : α → β) {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] :
∏ x in s.subtype p, f x = ∏ x in s.filter p, f x :=
begin
conv_lhs {
erw ←prod_map (s.subtype p) (function.embedding.subtype _) f
},
exact prod_congr (subtype_map _) (λ x hx, rfl)
end
/-- If all elements of a `finset` satisfy the predicate `p`, a product
over `s.subtype p` equals that product over `s`. -/
@[to_additive "If all elements of a `finset` satisfy the predicate `p`, a sum
over `s.subtype p` equals that sum over `s`."]
lemma prod_subtype_of_mem (f : α → β) {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) : ∏ x in s.subtype p, f x = ∏ x in s, f x :=
by simp_rw [prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter, filter_true_of_mem h]
/-- A product of a function over a `finset` in a subtype equals a
product in the main type of a function that agrees with the first
function on that `finset`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function over a `finset` in a subtype equals a
sum in the main type of a function that agrees with the first
function on that `finset`."]
lemma prod_subtype_map_embedding {p : α → Prop} {s : finset {x // p x}} {f : {x // p x} → β}
{g : α → β} (h : ∀ x : {x // p x}, x ∈ s → g x = f x) :
∏ x in s.map (function.embedding.subtype _), g x = ∏ x in s, f x :=
begin
rw finset.prod_map,
exact finset.prod_congr rfl h
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_eq_one {f : α → β} {s : finset α} (h : ∀x∈s, f x = 1) : (∏ x in s, f x) = 1 :=
calc (∏ x in s, f x) = ∏ x in s, 1 : finset.prod_congr rfl h
... = 1 : finset.prod_const_one
@[to_additive] lemma prod_apply_dite {s : finset α} {p : α → Prop} {hp : decidable_pred p}
(f : Π (x : α), p x → γ) (g : Π (x : α), ¬p x → γ) (h : γ → β) :
(∏ x in s, h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx)) =
(∏ x in (s.filter p).attach, h (f x.1 (mem_filter.mp x.2).2)) *
(∏ x in (s.filter (λ x, ¬ p x)).attach, h (g x.1 (mem_filter.mp x.2).2)) :=
by letI := classical.dec_eq α; exact
calc ∏ x in s, h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx)
= ∏ x in s.filter p ∪ s.filter (λ x, ¬ p x), h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx) :
by rw [filter_union_filter_neg_eq]
... = (∏ x in s.filter p, h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx)) *
(∏ x in s.filter (λ x, ¬ p x), h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx)) :
prod_union (by simp [disjoint_right] {contextual := tt})
... = (∏ x in (s.filter p).attach, h (if hx : p x.1 then f x.1 hx else g x.1 hx)) *
(∏ x in (s.filter (λ x, ¬ p x)).attach, h (if hx : p x.1 then f x.1 hx else g x.1 hx)) :
congr_arg2 _ prod_attach.symm prod_attach.symm
... = (∏ x in (s.filter p).attach, h (f x.1 (mem_filter.mp x.2).2)) *
(∏ x in (s.filter (λ x, ¬ p x)).attach, h (g x.1 (mem_filter.mp x.2).2)) :
congr_arg2 _
(prod_congr rfl (λ x hx, congr_arg h (dif_pos (mem_filter.mp x.2).2)))
(prod_congr rfl (λ x hx, congr_arg h (dif_neg (mem_filter.mp x.2).2)))
@[to_additive] lemma prod_apply_ite {s : finset α}
{p : α → Prop} {hp : decidable_pred p} (f g : α → γ) (h : γ → β) :
(∏ x in s, h (if p x then f x else g x)) =
(∏ x in s.filter p, h (f x)) * (∏ x in s.filter (λ x, ¬ p x), h (g x)) :=
trans (prod_apply_dite _ _ _)
(congr_arg2 _ (@prod_attach _ _ _ _ (h ∘ f)) (@prod_attach _ _ _ _ (h ∘ g)))
@[to_additive] lemma prod_dite {s : finset α} {p : α → Prop} {hp : decidable_pred p}
(f : Π (x : α), p x → β) (g : Π (x : α), ¬p x → β) :
(∏ x in s, if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx) =
(∏ x in (s.filter p).attach, f x.1 (mem_filter.mp x.2).2) *
(∏ x in (s.filter (λ x, ¬ p x)).attach, g x.1 (mem_filter.mp x.2).2) :=
by simp [prod_apply_dite _ _ (λ x, x)]
@[to_additive] lemma prod_ite {s : finset α}
{p : α → Prop} {hp : decidable_pred p} (f g : α → β) :
(∏ x in s, if p x then f x else g x) =
(∏ x in s.filter p, f x) * (∏ x in s.filter (λ x, ¬ p x), g x) :=
by simp [prod_apply_ite _ _ (λ x, x)]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_extend_by_one [decidable_eq α] (s : finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ i in s, (if i ∈ s then f i else 1) = ∏ i in s, f i :=
prod_congr rfl $ λ i hi, if_pos hi
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_dite_eq [decidable_eq α] (s : finset α) (a : α) (b : Π x : α, a = x → β) :
(∏ x in s, (if h : a = x then b x h else 1)) = ite (a ∈ s) (b a rfl) 1 :=
begin
split_ifs with h,
{ rw [finset.prod_eq_single a, dif_pos rfl],
{ intros, rw dif_neg, cc },
{ cc } },
{ rw finset.prod_eq_one,
intros, rw dif_neg, intro, cc }
end
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_dite_eq' [decidable_eq α] (s : finset α) (a : α) (b : Π x : α, x = a → β) :
(∏ x in s, (if h : x = a then b x h else 1)) = ite (a ∈ s) (b a rfl) 1 :=
begin
split_ifs with h,
{ rw [finset.prod_eq_single a, dif_pos rfl],
{ intros, rw dif_neg, cc },
{ cc } },
{ rw finset.prod_eq_one,
intros, rw dif_neg, intro, cc }
end
@[simp, to_additive] lemma prod_ite_eq [decidable_eq α] (s : finset α) (a : α) (b : α → β) :
(∏ x in s, (ite (a = x) (b x) 1)) = ite (a ∈ s) (b a) 1 :=
prod_dite_eq s a (λ x _, b x)
/--
When a product is taken over a conditional whose condition is an equality test on the index
and whose alternative is 1, then the product's value is either the term at that index or `1`.
The difference with `prod_ite_eq` is that the arguments to `eq` are swapped.
-/
@[simp, to_additive] lemma prod_ite_eq' [decidable_eq α] (s : finset α) (a : α) (b : α → β) :
(∏ x in s, (ite (x = a) (b x) 1)) = ite (a ∈ s) (b a) 1 :=
prod_dite_eq' s a (λ x _, b x)
/--
Reorder a product.
The difference with `prod_bij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
-/
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_bij {s : finset α} {t : finset γ} {f : α → β} {g : γ → β}
(i : Πa∈s, γ) (hi : ∀a ha, i a ha ∈ t) (h : ∀a ha, f a = g (i a ha))
(i_inj : ∀a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂, i a₁ ha₁ = i a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂) (i_surj : ∀b∈t, ∃a ha, b = i a ha) :
(∏ x in s, f x) = (∏ x in t, g x) :=
congr_arg multiset.prod
(multiset.map_eq_map_of_bij_of_nodup f g s.2 t.2 i hi h i_inj i_surj)
/--
Reorder a product.
The difference with `prod_bij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather than
as a surjective injection.
-/
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_bij' {s : finset α} {t : finset γ} {f : α → β} {g : γ → β}
(i : Πa∈s, γ) (hi : ∀a ha, i a ha ∈ t) (h : ∀a ha, f a = g (i a ha))
(j : Πa∈t, α) (hj : ∀a ha, j a ha ∈ s) (left_inv : ∀ a ha, j (i a ha) (hi a ha) = a)
(right_inv : ∀ a ha, i (j a ha) (hj a ha) = a) :
(∏ x in s, f x) = (∏ x in t, g x) :=
begin
refine prod_bij i hi h _ _,
{intros a1 a2 h1 h2 eq, rw [←left_inv a1 h1, ←left_inv a2 h2], cc,},
{intros b hb, use j b hb, use hj b hb, exact (right_inv b hb).symm,},
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_bij_ne_one {s : finset α} {t : finset γ} {f : α → β} {g : γ → β}
(i : Πa∈s, f a ≠ 1 → γ) (hi : ∀a h₁ h₂, i a h₁ h₂ ∈ t)
(i_inj : ∀a₁ a₂ h₁₁ h₁₂ h₂₁ h₂₂, i a₁ h₁₁ h₁₂ = i a₂ h₂₁ h₂₂ → a₁ = a₂)
(i_surj : ∀b∈t, g b ≠ 1 → ∃a h₁ h₂, b = i a h₁ h₂)
(h : ∀a h₁ h₂, f a = g (i a h₁ h₂)) :
(∏ x in s, f x) = (∏ x in t, g x) :=
by classical; exact
calc (∏ x in s, f x) = ∏ x in (s.filter $ λx, f x ≠ 1), f x : prod_filter_ne_one.symm
... = ∏ x in (t.filter $ λx, g x ≠ 1), g x :
prod_bij (assume a ha, i a (mem_filter.mp ha).1 (mem_filter.mp ha).2)
(assume a ha, (mem_filter.mp ha).elim $ λh₁ h₂, mem_filter.mpr
⟨hi a h₁ h₂, λ hg, h₂ (hg ▸ h a h₁ h₂)⟩)
(assume a ha, (mem_filter.mp ha).elim $ h a)
(assume a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂,
(mem_filter.mp ha₁).elim $ λ ha₁₁ ha₁₂,
(mem_filter.mp ha₂).elim $ λ ha₂₁ ha₂₂, i_inj a₁ a₂ _ _ _ _)
(assume b hb, (mem_filter.mp hb).elim $ λh₁ h₂,
let ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂, eq⟩ := i_surj b h₁ h₂ in ⟨a, mem_filter.mpr ⟨ha₁, ha₂⟩, eq⟩)
... = (∏ x in t, g x) : prod_filter_ne_one
@[to_additive]
lemma nonempty_of_prod_ne_one (h : (∏ x in s, f x) ≠ 1) : s.nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (λ H, false.elim $ h $ H.symm ▸ prod_empty) id
@[to_additive]
lemma exists_ne_one_of_prod_ne_one (h : (∏ x in s, f x) ≠ 1) : ∃a∈s, f a ≠ 1 :=
begin
classical,
rw ← prod_filter_ne_one at h,
rcases nonempty_of_prod_ne_one h with ⟨x, hx⟩,
exact ⟨x, (mem_filter.1 hx).1, (mem_filter.1 hx).2⟩
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_subset_one_on_sdiff [decidable_eq α] (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hg : ∀ x ∈ (s₂ \ s₁), g x = 1)
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s₁, f x = g x) : ∏ i in s₁, f i = ∏ i in s₂, g i :=
begin
rw [← prod_sdiff h, prod_eq_one hg, one_mul],
exact prod_congr rfl hfg
end
lemma sum_range_succ {β} [add_comm_monoid β] (f : ℕ → β) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ x in range (n + 1), f x) = f n + (∑ x in range n, f x) :=
by rw [range_succ, sum_insert not_mem_range_self]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_range_succ (f : ℕ → β) (n : ℕ) :
(∏ x in range (n + 1), f x) = f n * (∏ x in range n, f x) :=
by rw [range_succ, prod_insert not_mem_range_self]
lemma prod_range_succ' (f : ℕ → β) :
∀ n : ℕ, (∏ k in range (n + 1), f k) = (∏ k in range n, f (k+1)) * f 0
| 0 := (prod_range_succ _ _).trans $ mul_comm _ _
| (n + 1) := by rw [prod_range_succ (λ m, f (nat.succ m)), mul_assoc, ← prod_range_succ'];
exact prod_range_succ _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_range_zero (f : ℕ → β) :
(∏ k in range 0, f k) = 1 :=
by rw [range_zero, prod_empty]
lemma prod_range_one (f : ℕ → β) :
(∏ k in range 1, f k) = f 0 :=
by { rw [range_one], apply @prod_singleton ℕ β 0 f }
lemma sum_range_one {δ : Type*} [add_comm_monoid δ] (f : ℕ → δ) :
(∑ k in range 1, f k) = f 0 :=
@prod_range_one (multiplicative δ) _ f
attribute [to_additive finset.sum_range_one] prod_range_one
open multiset
lemma prod_multiset_map_count [decidable_eq α] (s : multiset α)
{M : Type*} [comm_monoid M] (f : α → M) :
(s.map f).prod = ∏ m in s.to_finset, (f m) ^ (s.count m) :=
begin
apply s.induction_on, { simp only [prod_const_one, count_zero, prod_zero, pow_zero, map_zero] },
intros a s ih,
simp only [prod_cons, map_cons, to_finset_cons, ih],
by_cases has : a ∈ s.to_finset,
{ rw [insert_eq_of_mem has, ← insert_erase has, prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _),
prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), ← mul_assoc, count_cons_self, pow_succ],
congr' 1, refine prod_congr rfl (λ x hx, _),
rw [count_cons_of_ne (ne_of_mem_erase hx)] },
rw [prod_insert has, count_cons_self, count_eq_zero_of_not_mem (mt mem_to_finset.2 has), pow_one],
congr' 1, refine prod_congr rfl (λ x hx, _),
rw count_cons_of_ne,
rintro rfl, exact has hx
end
lemma prod_multiset_count [decidable_eq α] [comm_monoid α] (s : multiset α) :
s.prod = ∏ m in s.to_finset, m ^ (s.count m) :=
by { convert prod_multiset_map_count s id, rw map_id }
/--
To prove a property of a product, it suffices to prove that
the property is multiplicative and holds on factors.
-/
@[to_additive "To prove a property of a sum, it suffices to prove that
the property is additive and holds on summands."]
lemma prod_induction {M : Type*} [comm_monoid M] (f : α → M) (p : M → Prop)
(p_mul : ∀ a b, p a → p b → p (a * b)) (p_one : p 1) (p_s : ∀ x ∈ s, p $ f x) :
p $ ∏ x in s, f x :=
begin
classical,
induction s using finset.induction with x hx s hs, simpa,
rw finset.prod_insert, swap, assumption,
apply p_mul, apply p_s, simp,
apply hs, intros a ha, apply p_s, simp [ha],
end
/--
For any product along `{0, ..., n-1}` of a commutative-monoid-valued function, we can verify that
it's equal to a different function just by checking ratios of adjacent terms.
This is a multiplicative discrete analogue of the fundamental theorem of calculus. -/
lemma prod_range_induction {M : Type*} [comm_monoid M]
(f s : ℕ → M) (h0 : s 0 = 1) (h : ∀ n, s (n + 1) = s n * f n) (n : ℕ) :
∏ k in finset.range n, f k = s n :=
begin
induction n with k hk,
{ simp only [h0, finset.prod_range_zero] },
{ simp only [hk, finset.prod_range_succ, h, mul_comm] }
end
/--
For any sum along `{0, ..., n-1}` of a commutative-monoid-valued function,
we can verify that it's equal to a different function
just by checking differences of adjacent terms.
This is a discrete analogue
of the fundamental theorem of calculus.
-/
lemma sum_range_induction {M : Type*} [add_comm_monoid M]
(f s : ℕ → M) (h0 : s 0 = 0) (h : ∀ n, s (n + 1) = s n + f n) (n : ℕ) :
∑ k in finset.range n, f k = s n :=
@prod_range_induction (multiplicative M) _ f s h0 h n
/-- A telescoping sum along `{0, ..., n-1}` of an additive commutative group valued function
reduces to the difference of the last and first terms.-/
lemma sum_range_sub {G : Type*} [add_comm_group G] (f : ℕ → G) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i in range n, (f (i+1) - f i) = f n - f 0 :=
by { apply sum_range_induction; abel, simp }
lemma sum_range_sub' {G : Type*} [add_comm_group G] (f : ℕ → G) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i in range n, (f i - f (i+1)) = f 0 - f n :=
by { apply sum_range_induction; abel, simp }
/-- A telescoping product along `{0, ..., n-1}` of a commutative group valued function
reduces to the ratio of the last and first factors.-/
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_range_div {M : Type*} [comm_group M] (f : ℕ → M) (n : ℕ) :
∏ i in range n, (f (i+1) * (f i)⁻¹) = f n * (f 0)⁻¹ :=
by simpa only [← div_eq_mul_inv] using @sum_range_sub (additive M) _ f n
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_range_div' {M : Type*} [comm_group M] (f : ℕ → M) (n : ℕ) :
∏ i in range n, (f i * (f (i+1))⁻¹) = (f 0) * (f n)⁻¹ :=
by simpa only [← div_eq_mul_inv] using @sum_range_sub' (additive M) _ f n
/--
A telescoping sum along `{0, ..., n-1}` of an `ℕ`-valued function
reduces to the difference of the last and first terms
when the function we are summing is monotone.
-/
lemma sum_range_sub_of_monotone {f : ℕ → ℕ} (h : monotone f) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i in range n, (f (i+1) - f i) = f n - f 0 :=
begin
refine sum_range_induction _ _ (nat.sub_self _) (λ n, _) _,
have h₁ : f n ≤ f (n+1) := h (nat.le_succ _),
have h₂ : f 0 ≤ f n := h (nat.zero_le _),
rw [←nat.sub_add_comm h₂, nat.add_sub_cancel' h₁],
end
@[simp] lemma prod_const (b : β) : (∏ x in s, b) = b ^ s.card :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α; exact
finset.induction_on s rfl (λ a s has ih,
by rw [prod_insert has, card_insert_of_not_mem has, pow_succ, ih])
lemma pow_eq_prod_const (b : β) : ∀ n, b ^ n = ∏ k in range n, b
| 0 := rfl
| (n+1) := by simp
lemma prod_pow (s : finset α) (n : ℕ) (f : α → β) :
(∏ x in s, f x ^ n) = (∏ x in s, f x) ^ n :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α; exact
finset.induction_on s (by simp) (by simp [mul_pow] {contextual := tt})
-- `to_additive` fails on this lemma, so we prove it manually below
lemma prod_flip {n : ℕ} (f : ℕ → β) :
(∏ r in range (n + 1), f (n - r)) = (∏ k in range (n + 1), f k) :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
{ rw [prod_range_one, prod_range_one] },
{ rw [prod_range_succ', prod_range_succ _ (nat.succ n), mul_comm],
simp [← ih] }
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_involution {s : finset α} {f : α → β} :
∀ (g : Π a ∈ s, α)
(h : ∀ a ha, f a * f (g a ha) = 1)
(g_ne : ∀ a ha, f a ≠ 1 → g a ha ≠ a)
(g_mem : ∀ a ha, g a ha ∈ s)
(g_inv : ∀ a ha, g (g a ha) (g_mem a ha) = a),
(∏ x in s, f x) = 1 :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α;
haveI := classical.dec_eq β; exact
finset.strong_induction_on s
(λ s ih g h g_ne g_mem g_inv,
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (λ hs, hs.symm ▸ rfl)
(λ ⟨x, hx⟩,
have hmem : ∀ y ∈ (s.erase x).erase (g x hx), y ∈ s,
from λ y hy, (mem_of_mem_erase (mem_of_mem_erase hy)),
have g_inj : ∀ {x hx y hy}, g x hx = g y hy → x = y,
from λ x hx y hy h, by rw [← g_inv x hx, ← g_inv y hy]; simp [h],
have ih': ∏ y in erase (erase s x) (g x hx), f y = (1 : β) :=
ih ((s.erase x).erase (g x hx))
⟨subset.trans (erase_subset _ _) (erase_subset _ _),
λ h, not_mem_erase (g x hx) (s.erase x) (h (g_mem x hx))⟩
(λ y hy, g y (hmem y hy))
(λ y hy, h y (hmem y hy))
(λ y hy, g_ne y (hmem y hy))
(λ y hy, mem_erase.2 ⟨λ (h : g y _ = g x hx), by simpa [g_inj h] using hy,
mem_erase.2 ⟨λ (h : g y _ = x),
have y = g x hx, from g_inv y (hmem y hy) ▸ by simp [h],
by simpa [this] using hy, g_mem y (hmem y hy)⟩⟩)
(λ y hy, g_inv y (hmem y hy)),
if hx1 : f x = 1
then ih' ▸ eq.symm (prod_subset hmem
(λ y hy hy₁,
have y = x ∨ y = g x hx, by simp [hy] at hy₁; tauto,
this.elim (λ hy, hy.symm ▸ hx1)
(λ hy, h x hx ▸ hy ▸ hx1.symm ▸ (one_mul _).symm)))
else by rw [← insert_erase hx, prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _),
← insert_erase (mem_erase.2 ⟨g_ne x hx hx1, g_mem x hx⟩),
prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), ih', mul_one, h x hx]))
/-- The product of the composition of functions `f` and `g`, is the product
over `b ∈ s.image g` of `f b` to the power of the cardinality of the fibre of `b` -/
lemma prod_comp [decidable_eq γ] {s : finset α} (f : γ → β) (g : α → γ) :
∏ a in s, f (g a) = ∏ b in s.image g, f b ^ (s.filter (λ a, g a = b)).card :=
calc ∏ a in s, f (g a)
= ∏ x in (s.image g).sigma (λ b : γ, s.filter (λ a, g a = b)), f (g x.2) :
prod_bij (λ a ha, ⟨g a, a⟩) (by simp; tauto) (λ _ _, rfl) (by simp) (by finish)
... = ∏ b in s.image g, ∏ a in s.filter (λ a, g a = b), f (g a) : prod_sigma
... = ∏ b in s.image g, ∏ a in s.filter (λ a, g a = b), f b :
prod_congr rfl (λ b hb, prod_congr rfl (by simp {contextual := tt}))
... = ∏ b in s.image g, f b ^ (s.filter (λ a, g a = b)).card :
prod_congr rfl (λ _ _, prod_const _)
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_piecewise [decidable_eq α] (s t : finset α) (f g : α → β) :
(∏ x in s, (t.piecewise f g) x) = (∏ x in s ∩ t, f x) * (∏ x in s \ t, g x) :=
by { rw [piecewise, prod_ite, filter_mem_eq_inter, ← sdiff_eq_filter], }
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_inter_mul_prod_diff [decidable_eq α] (s t : finset α) (f : α → β) :
(∏ x in s ∩ t, f x) * (∏ x in s \ t, f x) = (∏ x in s, f x) :=
by { convert (s.prod_piecewise t f f).symm, simp [finset.piecewise] }
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_prod_diff_singleton [decidable_eq α] {s : finset α} {i : α} (h : i ∈ s)
(f : α → β) : f i * (∏ x in s \ {i}, f x) = ∏ x in s, f x :=
by { convert s.prod_inter_mul_prod_diff {i} f, simp [h] }
/-- A product can be partitioned into a product of products, each equivalent under a setoid. -/
@[to_additive "A sum can be partitioned into a sum of sums, each equivalent under a setoid."]
lemma prod_partition (R : setoid α) [decidable_rel R.r] :
(∏ x in s, f x) = ∏ xbar in s.image quotient.mk, ∏ y in s.filter (λ y, ⟦y⟧ = xbar), f y :=
begin
refine (finset.prod_image' f (λ x hx, _)).symm,
refl,
end
/-- If we can partition a product into subsets that cancel out, then the whole product cancels. -/
@[to_additive "If we can partition a sum into subsets that cancel out, then the whole sum cancels."]
lemma prod_cancels_of_partition_cancels (R : setoid α) [decidable_rel R.r]
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, (∏ a in s.filter (λ y, y ≈ x), f a) = 1) : (∏ x in s, f x) = 1 :=
begin
rw [prod_partition R, ←finset.prod_eq_one],
intros xbar xbar_in_s,
obtain ⟨x, x_in_s, xbar_eq_x⟩ := mem_image.mp xbar_in_s,
rw [←xbar_eq_x, filter_congr (λ y _, @quotient.eq _ R y x)],
apply h x x_in_s,
end
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_update_of_not_mem [decidable_eq α] {s : finset α} {i : α}
(h : i ∉ s) (f : α → β) (b : β) : (∏ x in s, function.update f i b x) = (∏ x in s, f x) :=
begin
apply prod_congr rfl (λj hj, _),
have : j ≠ i, by { assume eq, rw eq at hj, exact h hj },
simp [this]
end
lemma prod_update_of_mem [decidable_eq α] {s : finset α} {i : α} (h : i ∈ s) (f : α → β) (b : β) :
(∏ x in s, function.update f i b x) = b * (∏ x in s \ (singleton i), f x) :=
by { rw [update_eq_piecewise, prod_piecewise], simp [h] }
/-- If a product of a `finset` of size at most 1 has a given value, so
do the terms in that product. -/
lemma eq_of_card_le_one_of_prod_eq {s : finset α} (hc : s.card ≤ 1) {f : α → β} {b : β}
(h : ∏ x in s, f x = b) : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = b :=
begin
intros x hx,
by_cases hc0 : s.card = 0,
{ exact false.elim (card_ne_zero_of_mem hx hc0) },
{ have h1 : s.card = 1 := le_antisymm hc (nat.one_le_of_lt (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hc0)),
rw card_eq_one at h1,
cases h1 with x2 hx2,
rw [hx2, mem_singleton] at hx,
simp_rw hx2 at h,
rw hx,
rw prod_singleton at h,
exact h }
end
/-- If a sum of a `finset` of size at most 1 has a given value, so do
the terms in that sum. -/
lemma eq_of_card_le_one_of_sum_eq [add_comm_monoid γ] {s : finset α} (hc : s.card ≤ 1)
{f : α → γ} {b : γ} (h : ∑ x in s, f x = b) : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = b :=
begin
intros x hx,
by_cases hc0 : s.card = 0,
{ exact false.elim (card_ne_zero_of_mem hx hc0) },
{ have h1 : s.card = 1 := le_antisymm hc (nat.one_le_of_lt (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hc0)),
rw card_eq_one at h1,
cases h1 with x2 hx2,
rw [hx2, mem_singleton] at hx,
simp_rw hx2 at h,
rw hx,
rw sum_singleton at h,
exact h }
end
attribute [to_additive eq_of_card_le_one_of_sum_eq] eq_of_card_le_one_of_prod_eq
/-- If a function applied at a point is 1, a product is unchanged by
removing that point, if present, from a `finset`. -/
@[to_additive "If a function applied at a point is 0, a sum is unchanged by
removing that point, if present, from a `finset`."]
lemma prod_erase [decidable_eq α] (s : finset α) {f : α → β} {a : α} (h : f a = 1) :
∏ x in s.erase a, f x = ∏ x in s, f x :=
begin
rw ←sdiff_singleton_eq_erase,
apply prod_subset sdiff_subset_self,
intros x hx hnx,
rw sdiff_singleton_eq_erase at hnx,
rwa eq_of_mem_of_not_mem_erase hx hnx
end
/-- If a product is 1 and the function is 1 except possibly at one
point, it is 1 everywhere on the `finset`. -/
@[to_additive "If a sum is 0 and the function is 0 except possibly at one
point, it is 0 everywhere on the `finset`."]
lemma eq_one_of_prod_eq_one {s : finset α} {f : α → β} {a : α} (hp : ∏ x in s, f x = 1)
(h1 : ∀ x ∈ s, x ≠ a → f x = 1) : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = 1 :=
begin
intros x hx,
classical,
by_cases h : x = a,
{ rw h,
rw h at hx,
rw [←prod_subset (singleton_subset_iff.2 hx)
(λ t ht ha, h1 t ht (not_mem_singleton.1 ha)),
prod_singleton] at hp,
exact hp },
{ exact h1 x hx h }
end
lemma prod_pow_boole [decidable_eq α] (s : finset α) (f : α → β) (a : α) :
(∏ x in s, (f x)^(ite (a = x) 1 0)) = ite (a ∈ s) (f a) 1 :=
by simp
end comm_monoid
/-- If `f = g = h` everywhere but at `i`, where `f i = g i + h i`, then the product of `f` over `s`
is the sum of the products of `g` and `h`. -/
lemma prod_add_prod_eq [comm_semiring β] {s : finset α} {i : α} {f g h : α → β}
(hi : i ∈ s) (h1 : g i + h i = f i) (h2 : ∀ j ∈ s, j ≠ i → g j = f j)
(h3 : ∀ j ∈ s, j ≠ i → h j = f j) : ∏ i in s, g i + ∏ i in s, h i = ∏ i in s, f i :=
by { classical, simp_rw [← mul_prod_diff_singleton hi, ← h1, right_distrib],
congr' 2; apply prod_congr rfl; simpa }
lemma sum_update_of_mem [add_comm_monoid β] [decidable_eq α] {s : finset α} {i : α}
(h : i ∈ s) (f : α → β) (b : β) :
(∑ x in s, function.update f i b x) = b + (∑ x in s \ (singleton i), f x) :=
by { rw [update_eq_piecewise, sum_piecewise], simp [h] }
attribute [to_additive] prod_update_of_mem
lemma sum_nsmul [add_comm_monoid β] (s : finset α) (n : ℕ) (f : α → β) :
(∑ x in s, n •ℕ (f x)) = n •ℕ ((∑ x in s, f x)) :=
@prod_pow _ (multiplicative β) _ _ _ _
attribute [to_additive sum_nsmul] prod_pow
@[simp] lemma sum_const [add_comm_monoid β] (b : β) :
(∑ x in s, b) = s.card •ℕ b :=
@prod_const _ (multiplicative β) _ _ _
attribute [to_additive] prod_const
lemma card_eq_sum_ones (s : finset α) : s.card = ∑ _ in s, 1 :=
by simp
lemma sum_const_nat {m : ℕ} {f : α → ℕ} (h₁ : ∀x ∈ s, f x = m) :
(∑ x in s, f x) = card s * m :=
begin
rw [← nat.nsmul_eq_mul, ← sum_const],
apply sum_congr rfl h₁
end
@[simp]
lemma sum_boole {s : finset α} {p : α → Prop} [semiring β] {hp : decidable_pred p} :
(∑ x in s, if p x then (1 : β) else (0 : β)) = (s.filter p).card :=
by simp [sum_ite]
@[norm_cast]
lemma sum_nat_cast [add_comm_monoid β] [has_one β] (s : finset α) (f : α → ℕ) :
↑(∑ x in s, f x : ℕ) = (∑ x in s, (f x : β)) :=
(nat.cast_add_monoid_hom β).map_sum f s
@[norm_cast]
lemma sum_int_cast [add_comm_group β] [has_one β] (s : finset α) (f : α → ℤ) :
↑(∑ x in s, f x : ℤ) = (∑ x in s, (f x : β)) :=
(int.cast_add_hom β).map_sum f s
lemma sum_comp [add_comm_monoid β] [decidable_eq γ] {s : finset α} (f : γ → β) (g : α → γ) :
∑ a in s, f (g a) = ∑ b in s.image g, (s.filter (λ a, g a = b)).card •ℕ (f b) :=
@prod_comp _ (multiplicative β) _ _ _ _ _ _
attribute [to_additive "The sum of the composition of functions `f` and `g`, is the sum
over `b ∈ s.image g` of `f b` times of the cardinality of the fibre of `b`"] prod_comp
lemma sum_range_succ' [add_comm_monoid β] (f : ℕ → β) :
∀ n : ℕ, (∑ i in range (n + 1), f i) = (∑ i in range n, f (i + 1)) + f 0 :=
@prod_range_succ' (multiplicative β) _ _
attribute [to_additive] prod_range_succ'
lemma sum_flip [add_comm_monoid β] {n : ℕ} (f : ℕ → β) :
(∑ i in range (n + 1), f (n - i)) = (∑ i in range (n + 1), f i) :=
@prod_flip (multiplicative β) _ _ _
attribute [to_additive] prod_flip
section opposite
open opposite
/-- Moving to the opposite additive commutative monoid commutes with summing. -/
@[simp] lemma op_sum [add_comm_monoid β] {s : finset α} (f : α → β) :
op (∑ x in s, f x) = ∑ x in s, op (f x) :=
(op_add_equiv : β ≃+ βᵒᵖ).map_sum _ _
@[simp] lemma unop_sum [add_comm_monoid β] {s : finset α} (f : α → βᵒᵖ) :
unop (∑ x in s, f x) = ∑ x in s, unop (f x) :=
(op_add_equiv : β ≃+ βᵒᵖ).symm.map_sum _ _
end opposite
section comm_group
variables [comm_group β]
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma prod_inv_distrib : (∏ x in s, (f x)⁻¹) = (∏ x in s, f x)⁻¹ :=
s.prod_hom has_inv.inv
end comm_group
@[simp] theorem card_sigma {σ : α → Type*} (s : finset α) (t : Π a, finset (σ a)) :
card (s.sigma t) = ∑ a in s, card (t a) :=
multiset.card_sigma _ _
lemma card_bind [decidable_eq β] {s : finset α} {t : α → finset β}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → disjoint (t x) (t y)) :
(s.bind t).card = ∑ u in s, card (t u) :=
calc (s.bind t).card = ∑ i in s.bind t, 1 : by simp
... = ∑ a in s, ∑ i in t a, 1 : finset.sum_bind h
... = ∑ u in s, card (t u) : by simp
lemma card_bind_le [decidable_eq β] {s : finset α} {t : α → finset β} :
(s.bind t).card ≤ ∑ a in s, (t a).card :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α; exact
finset.induction_on s (by simp)
(λ a s has ih,
calc ((insert a s).bind t).card ≤ (t a).card + (s.bind t).card :
by rw bind_insert; exact finset.card_union_le _ _
... ≤ ∑ a in insert a s, card (t a) :
by rw sum_insert has; exact add_le_add_left ih _)
theorem card_eq_sum_card_fiberwise [decidable_eq β] {f : α → β} {s : finset α} {t : finset β}
(H : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ t) :
s.card = ∑ a in t, (s.filter (λ x, f x = a)).card :=
by simp only [card_eq_sum_ones, sum_fiberwise_of_maps_to H]
theorem card_eq_sum_card_image [decidable_eq β] (f : α → β) (s : finset α) :
s.card = ∑ a in s.image f, (s.filter (λ x, f x = a)).card :=
card_eq_sum_card_fiberwise (λ _, mem_image_of_mem _)
lemma gsmul_sum [add_comm_group β] {f : α → β} {s : finset α} (z : ℤ) :
gsmul z (∑ a in s, f a) = ∑ a in s, gsmul z (f a) :=
(s.sum_hom (gsmul z)).symm
@[simp] lemma sum_sub_distrib [add_comm_group β] :
∑ x in s, (f x - g x) = (∑ x in s, f x) - (∑ x in s, g x) :=
by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using sum_add_distrib.trans (congr_arg _ sum_neg_distrib)
section prod_eq_zero
variables [comm_monoid_with_zero β]
lemma prod_eq_zero (ha : a ∈ s) (h : f a = 0) : (∏ x in s, f x) = 0 :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq α;
calc (∏ x in s, f x) = ∏ x in insert a (erase s a), f x : by rw insert_erase ha
... = 0 : by rw [prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), h, zero_mul]
lemma prod_boole {s : finset α} {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p] :
∏ i in s, ite (p i) (1 : β) (0 : β) = ite (∀ i ∈ s, p i) 1 0 :=
begin
split_ifs,
{ apply prod_eq_one,
intros i hi,
rw if_pos (h i hi) },
{ push_neg at h,
rcases h with ⟨i, hi, hq⟩,
apply prod_eq_zero hi,
rw [if_neg hq] },
end
variables [nontrivial β] [no_zero_divisors β]
lemma prod_eq_zero_iff : (∏ x in s, f x) = 0 ↔ (∃a∈s, f a = 0) :=
begin
classical,
apply finset.induction_on s,
exact ⟨not.elim one_ne_zero, λ ⟨_, H, _⟩, H.elim⟩,
assume a s ha ih,
rw [prod_insert ha, mul_eq_zero, bex_def, exists_mem_insert, ih, ← bex_def]
end
theorem prod_ne_zero_iff : (∏ x in s, f x) ≠ 0 ↔ (∀ a ∈ s, f a ≠ 0) :=
by { rw [ne, prod_eq_zero_iff], push_neg }
end prod_eq_zero
section comm_group_with_zero
variables [comm_group_with_zero β]
@[simp]
lemma prod_inv_distrib' : (∏ x in s, (f x)⁻¹) = (∏ x in s, f x)⁻¹ :=
begin
classical,
by_cases h : ∃ x ∈ s, f x = 0,
{ simpa [prod_eq_zero_iff.mpr h, prod_eq_zero_iff] using h },
{ push_neg at h,
have h' := prod_ne_zero_iff.mpr h,
have hf : ∀ x ∈ s, (f x)⁻¹ * f x = 1 := λ x hx, inv_mul_cancel (h x hx),
apply mul_right_cancel' h',
simp [h, h', ← finset.prod_mul_distrib, prod_congr rfl hf] }
end
end comm_group_with_zero
end finset
namespace list
@[to_additive] lemma prod_to_finset {M : Type*} [decidable_eq α] [comm_monoid M]
(f : α → M) : ∀ {l : list α} (hl : l.nodup), l.to_finset.prod f = (l.map f).prod
| [] _ := by simp
| (a :: l) hl := let ⟨not_mem, hl⟩ := list.nodup_cons.mp hl in
by simp [finset.prod_insert (mt list.mem_to_finset.mp not_mem), prod_to_finset hl]
end list
namespace multiset
variables [decidable_eq α]
@[simp] lemma to_finset_sum_count_eq (s : multiset α) :
(∑ a in s.to_finset, s.count a) = s.card :=
multiset.induction_on s rfl
(assume a s ih,
calc (∑ x in to_finset (a ::ₘ s), count x (a ::ₘ s)) =
∑ x in to_finset (a ::ₘ s), ((if x = a then 1 else 0) + count x s) :
finset.sum_congr rfl $ λ _ _, by split_ifs;
[simp only [h, count_cons_self, nat.one_add], simp only [count_cons_of_ne h, zero_add]]
... = card (a ::ₘ s) :
begin
by_cases a ∈ s.to_finset,
{ have : ∑ x in s.to_finset, ite (x = a) 1 0 = ∑ x in {a}, ite (x = a) 1 0,
{ rw [finset.sum_ite_eq', if_pos h, finset.sum_singleton, if_pos rfl], },
rw [to_finset_cons, finset.insert_eq_of_mem h, finset.sum_add_distrib, ih, this,
finset.sum_singleton, if_pos rfl, add_comm, card_cons] },
{ have ha : a ∉ s, by rwa mem_to_finset at h,
have : ∑ x in to_finset s, ite (x = a) 1 0 = ∑ x in to_finset s, 0, from
finset.sum_congr rfl (λ x hx, if_neg $ by rintro rfl; cc),
rw [to_finset_cons, finset.sum_insert h, if_pos rfl, finset.sum_add_distrib, this,
finset.sum_const_zero, ih, count_eq_zero_of_not_mem ha, zero_add, add_comm, card_cons] }
end)
lemma count_sum' {s : finset β} {a : α} {f : β → multiset α} :
count a (∑ x in s, f x) = ∑ x in s, count a (f x) :=
by { dunfold finset.sum, rw count_sum }
@[simp] lemma to_finset_sum_count_smul_eq (s : multiset α) :
(∑ a in s.to_finset, s.count a •ℕ (a ::ₘ 0)) = s :=
begin
apply ext', intro b,
rw count_sum',
have h : count b s = count b (count b s •ℕ (b ::ₘ 0)),
{ rw [singleton_coe, count_smul, ← singleton_coe, count_singleton, mul_one] },
rw h, clear h,
apply finset.sum_eq_single b,
{ intros c h hcb, rw count_smul, convert mul_zero (count c s),
apply count_eq_zero.mpr, exact finset.not_mem_singleton.mpr (ne.symm hcb) },
{ intro hb, rw [count_eq_zero_of_not_mem (mt mem_to_finset.2 hb), count_smul, zero_mul]}
end
theorem exists_smul_of_dvd_count (s : multiset α) {k : ℕ} (h : ∀ (a : α), k ∣ multiset.count a s) :
∃ (u : multiset α), s = k •ℕ u :=
begin
use ∑ a in s.to_finset, (s.count a / k) •ℕ (a ::ₘ 0),
have h₂ : ∑ (x : α) in s.to_finset, k •ℕ (count x s / k •ℕ (x ::ₘ 0)) =
∑ (x : α) in s.to_finset, count x s •ℕ (x ::ₘ 0),
{ refine congr_arg s.to_finset.sum _,
apply funext, intro x,
rw [← mul_nsmul, nat.mul_div_cancel' (h x)] },
rw [← finset.sum_nsmul, h₂, to_finset_sum_count_smul_eq]
end
end multiset
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma nat.coe_prod {R : Type*} [comm_semiring R]
(f : α → ℕ) (s : finset α) : (↑∏ i in s, f i : R) = ∏ i in s, f i :=
(nat.cast_ring_hom R).map_prod _ _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma int.coe_prod {R : Type*} [comm_ring R]
(f : α → ℤ) (s : finset α) : (↑∏ i in s, f i : R) = ∏ i in s, f i :=
(int.cast_ring_hom R).map_prod _ _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma units.coe_prod {M : Type*} [comm_monoid M]
(f : α → units M) (s : finset α) : (↑∏ i in s, f i : M) = ∏ i in s, f i :=
(units.coe_hom M).map_prod _ _
|
bc2e309ad3c8032bf700b4972e318eb3fed09273 | d4f8579bd5c4a56a88575ff0f1957193d83cf965 | /src/knuth.lean | b7e80b9baadfd748b5cd28399b7c7da66a0d0d75 | [] | no_license | ldct/lean-textbooks | 5b14efc448c6c0ee6b2a89d1c2243c5e343ea88c | 6550da16cd3f4c31145d3eb759a9326740a7dcd6 | refs/heads/master | 1,668,538,459,925 | 1,594,208,495,000 | 1,594,208,495,000 | 271,553,644 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 7,625 | lean | -- Graham, Knuth, Patashnik
-- Concrete Mathematics
import tactic
import data.real.basic
import data.num.basic
-- Chapter 1
def T_hanoi : ℕ → ℤ
| nat.zero := 0
| (nat.succ x) := (2* T_hanoi x) + 1
example : T_hanoi 10 = 2^10 - 1 :=
begin
repeat { rw T_hanoi },
comp_val
end
example (n : ℕ) : T_hanoi n = 2^n - 1 :=
begin
induction n,
comp_val,
rw T_hanoi,
rw n_ih,
rw pow_succ,
ring,
end
def L_steiner : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 := 0
| (x+1) := (L_steiner x) + x + 1
example : L_steiner 1 = 1 :=
begin
repeat { rw L_steiner },
end
-- I copied this proof from mathlib/big_operators.lean; however there it is stated using ∑ notation
lemma twice_steiner_closed (n : ℕ) : L_steiner n * 2 = n*(n+1) :=
begin
induction n,
norm_num,
rw L_steiner,
rw L_steiner,
rw add_mul,
rw add_mul,
rw n_ih,
rw nat.succ_eq_add_one,
ring,
end
lemma steiner_closed (n : ℕ) : L_steiner n = n*(n+1) / 2 :=
begin
rw ← twice_steiner_closed,
have two_pos : 2 > 0,
comp_val,
rw @nat.mul_div_cancel (L_steiner n) 2 two_pos,
end
-- 1.3 The Josephus Problem
-- We take equation 1.8 as the definition of the function J:
-- J(2*n) = 2*J(n) - 1
-- J(2*n+1) = 2*J(n) + 1
-- Actually, the real definition of J works on lists of naturals, e.g. to derive the even case of eqn 1.8 we say that J [1, 2, ... 2n] = J [1, 3, 5 ... 2n - 1].
-- It seems rather inconvenient to write a function ℕ → ℤ directly, so we use structural recursion on pos_num
def J_joseph₁ : pos_num → ℤ
| 1 := 1
| (pos_num.bit0 n) := 2*(J_joseph₁ n) - 1 -- J(2*n) = 2*J(n) - 1
| (pos_num.bit1 n) := 2*(J_joseph₁ n) + 1 -- J(2*n+1) = 2*J(n) + 1
def J_joseph : ℕ → ℤ
| 0 := 0
| (n+1) := J_joseph₁ (n:num).succ'
lemma J_joseph_even (n : ℕ) (h : n ≥ 1) : J_joseph(2*n) = 2*J_joseph(n) - 1 :=
sorry
-- todo: this needs n ≥ 1
lemma J_joseph_odd (n : ℕ) : J_joseph(2*n + 1) = 2*J_joseph(n) + 1 :=
sorry
example : J_joseph 100 = 73 :=
begin
comp_val,
end
-- lemma statement by Kevin Buzzard
def is_even (n : ℕ) := ∃ a, n = 2 * a
def is_odd (n : ℕ) := ∃ b, n = 2 * b + 1
lemma even_or_odd (n : ℕ) : is_even(n) ∨ is_odd(n) :=
begin
induction n,
left,
use 0,
linarith,
cases n_ih,
right,
cases n_ih with a h_a,
use a,
rw nat.succ_eq_add_one,
rw h_a,
cases n_ih with a h_a,
left,
use a+1,
rw nat.succ_eq_add_one,
rw h_a,
ring,
end
lemma pow_pos2 ( m: ℕ ) : 2^m ≥ 1 :=
begin
induction m,
rw nat.pow_zero,
linarith,
rw nat.pow_succ,
linarith,
end
-- Closed form of J for perfect powers of 2
theorem J_pow_2 (m : ℕ) : J_joseph(2 ^ m) = 1 :=
begin
induction m,
rw nat.pow_zero,
comp_val,
rw nat.pow_succ,
rw nat.mul_comm,
rw J_joseph_even,
rw m_ih,
comp_val,
-- 2 ^ m_n > 1
exact pow_pos2 m_n,
end
lemma bdd (m : ℕ) : (m < 1) → m = 0 :=
begin
exact nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le,
end
-- Kevin Buzzard
lemma lt_mul_cancel (n m k : ℕ) : (k*m + 1 < k*n) → (m < n) :=
begin
intro h,
refine lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left _ (show 0 ≤ k, by linarith),
refine lt_trans _ h,
omega,
end
-- eqn 1.9
-- If we imagine J to be defined as a function of two variables m and l, with l < 2^m, and draw the DP table for calculating J via the recurrence (each row representing m fixed and l varying), we treat each cell as depending on the entire previous row
-- There is a slick proof in the margin that probably requires us to work with J defined on lists in order to relate J(m, l) and J(m, l+1). Once related we can prove it using induction on l and J_pow_2.
lemma J_closed (m l : ℕ) : (l < 2^m) → J_joseph(2^m + l) = 2*l + 1 :=
begin
induction m generalizing l, -- draw the DP table!
intro h,
simp at h,
have h2 := bdd l h,
rw h2,
comp_val,
-- inductive step
rw nat.pow_succ,
have key := even_or_odd l,
cases key,
-- l even
cases key with w h_w,
rw h_w,
intro h,
rw mul_comm,
rw ← nat.left_distrib,
rw J_joseph_even,
ring at h,
have two_pos : 0 < 2,
comp_val,
have h := (mul_lt_mul_left two_pos).mp h,
specialize m_ih w,
rw m_ih h,
rw int.distrib_left, -- why isn't this called left_distrib?
rw int.coe_nat_mul,
ring,
have h2 := pow_pos2 m_n,
linarith,
-- l odd
cases key with w h_w,
rw h_w,
intro h,
rw mul_comm,
rw ← add_assoc _ _ 1,
rw ← nat.left_distrib,
rw J_joseph_odd,
rw mul_comm _ 2 at h,
have h := lt_mul_cancel (2 ^ m_n) w 2 h,
specialize m_ih w,
rw m_ih h,
ring,
rw int.coe_nat_add,
rw int.coe_nat_mul,
ring,
end
-- alternative closed form using mathlib functions, by Mario Carneiro
def J_joseph₂ (n : ℕ) : ℤ := (2 * n + 1) - (2 ^ nat.size n : ℕ)
-- knuth generalizes J here and considers iterating it until it reaches its fixpoint. This involves considering it as acting on binary digits.
-- Chapter 5
#reduce nat.choose 5 2
-- 5.3 is equivalent to choose_symm from mathlib
-- 5.4
-- Chapter 6
-- From TPIL
def fib : ℕ → ℤ
| 0 := 0
| 1 := 1
| (n+2) := fib (n+1) + fib n
lemma helper (n : ℕ) : (-1:ℤ)^(n+2) = (-1) * (-1)^(n+1) :=
begin
exact rfl,
end
theorem cassini (n : ℕ) : (n > 0) → (fib (n+1)) * (fib (n-1)) - (fib (n)) ^ 2 = (-1)^n :=
begin
cases n,
intro h,
linarith,
-- now n is replaced by nat.succ n
induction n,
-- the base case has actual content now
intro h,
simp,
rw fib,
rw fib,
rw fib,
norm_num,
-- inductive case
intro h,
have p : nat.succ n_n > 0,
exact nat.succ_pos n_n,
have n_ih := n_ih p,
rw nat.succ_eq_add_one at n_ih,
rw nat.succ_eq_add_one,
rw nat.succ_eq_add_one,
simp,
simp at n_ih,
-- we express everything in terms of F_n and F_{n+1}
have h2 : fib (n_n+2) = fib (n_n+1) + fib n_n,
rw fib,
have h3 : fib (n_n+3) = fib (n_n+2) + fib (n_n + 1),
rw fib,
rw h3,
rw h2,
rw h2 at n_ih,
ring,
have helper := helper n_n,
rw helper,
ring,
rw ← n_ih,
ring,
end
theorem k_future (n k : ℕ) : (k > 0) → fib (n+k) = (fib k)*(fib (n+1)) + (fib (k-1))*(fib n) :=
begin
cases k,
intro h,
linarith,
intro h,
induction k generalizing n,
rw fib,
simp,
rw fib,
simp,
-- inductive
have p : nat.succ k_n > 0,
exact nat.succ_pos k_n,
have k_ih := k_ih p,
rw nat.succ_eq_add_one at k_ih,
repeat { rw nat.succ_eq_add_one },
simp,
simp at k_ih,
rw ← add_assoc,
specialize k_ih (n+1),
ring at k_ih,
rw ← add_assoc at k_ih,
rw k_ih,
simp,
rw fib,
rw nat.succ_eq_add_one,
rw fib,
rw nat.succ_eq_add_one,
ring,
end
lemma dichotomy (a : ℕ) : a > 0 ∨ a = 0 :=
begin
have h := nat.eq_zero_or_pos a,
exact or.swap h,
end
-- 6.110
theorem f_div ( n k : ℕ) : fib n ∣ fib (k*n) :=
begin
induction k,
simp,
rw fib,
exact dvd_zero (fib n),
have key := dichotomy (n*k_n),
cases key,
-- case 1
have h := k_future n (k_n*n) _,
rw nat.succ_eq_add_one,
ring,
rw add_comm,
rw mul_comm,
rw h,
cases k_ih,
rw k_ih_h,
use (k_ih_w * fib (n + 1)) + fib (k_n * n - 1),
ring,
rw mul_comm,
-- case 2
exact key,
rw nat.succ_eq_add_one,
ring,
rw key,
simp,
end
-- exercise 27
example (m n : ℕ) : int.gcd (fib m) (fib n) = nat.gcd m n :=
begin
sorry
end
-- todo: converse of f_div
-- matijasevich's lemma
example (m n : ℕ) (h : n > 2): (fib n)^2 ∣ fib m ↔ (n:ℤ)*(fib n) ∣ (m:ℤ) := sorry
-- todo: Zeckendorf's theorem states that every positive integer can be represented uniquely as the sum of one or more distinct Fibonacci numbers in such a way that the sum does not include any two consecutive Fibonacci numbers.
-- looks hard |
c4e2ad2e0db159facc878dcddbb1c6834d1c7659 | 0845ae2ca02071debcfd4ac24be871236c01784f | /library/init/control/applicative.lean | fc963e28b74729e89b21d00156287610a4bc4107 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | GaloisInc/lean4 | 74c267eb0e900bfaa23df8de86039483ecbd60b7 | 228ddd5fdcd98dd4e9c009f425284e86917938aa | refs/heads/master | 1,643,131,356,301 | 1,562,715,572,000 | 1,562,715,572,000 | 192,390,898 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,560,792,750,000 | 1,560,792,749,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,080 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Sebastian Ullrich
-/
prelude
import init.control.functor
open Function
universes u v
class HasPure (f : Type u → Type v) :=
(pure {} {α : Type u} : α → f α)
export HasPure (pure)
class HasSeq (f : Type u → Type v) : Type (max (u+1) v) :=
(seq : ∀ {α β : Type u}, f (α → β) → f α → f β)
infixl <*> := HasSeq.seq
class HasSeqLeft (f : Type u → Type v) : Type (max (u+1) v) :=
(seqLeft : ∀ {α β : Type u}, f α → f β → f α)
infixl <* := HasSeqLeft.seqLeft
class HasSeqRight (f : Type u → Type v) : Type (max (u+1) v) :=
(seqRight : ∀ {α β : Type u}, f α → f β → f β)
infixr *> := HasSeqRight.seqRight
class Applicative (f : Type u → Type v) extends Functor f, HasPure f, HasSeq f, HasSeqLeft f, HasSeqRight f :=
(map := fun _ _ x y => pure x <*> y)
(seqLeft := fun α β a b => const β <$> a <*> b)
(seqRight := fun α β a b => const α id <$> a <*> b)
|
d1853f663dc94820ffd6c3aad1cc00f81d3ff0f9 | 08a8ee10652ba4f8592710ceb654b37e951d9082 | /src/hott/prop_trunc.lean | 89e3d5c84504e211841d16ad9ed3146b717326ef | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | felixwellen/hott3 | e9f299c84d30a782a741c40d38741ec024d391fb | 8ac87a2699ab94c23ea7984b4a5fbd5a7052575c | refs/heads/master | 1,619,972,899,098 | 1,509,047,351,000 | 1,518,040,986,000 | 120,676,559 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,518,040,503,000 | 1,518,040,503,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,967 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Jakob von Raumer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jakob von Raumer, Floris van Doorn
Proof of the @[hott] theorem that (is_trunc n A) is a mere proposition
We prove this here to avoid circular dependency of files
We want to use this in .equiv; .equiv is imported by .function and .function is imported by .trunc
-/
import hott.types.pi
universe u
namespace hott
hott_theory
open hott.sigma
namespace is_trunc
@[hott] def is_contr.sigma_char (A : Type u) :
(Σ (center : A), Π (a : A), center = a) ≃ (is_contr A) :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ intro S, exact (is_contr.mk S.1 S.2)},
{ intro H, cases H with H', cases H' with ce co, exact ⟨ce, co⟩},
{ intro H, cases H with H', cases H' with ce co, exact idp},
{ intro S, cases S, apply idp}
end
@[hott] def is_trunc.pi_char (n : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type u) :
(Π (x y : A), is_trunc n (x = y)) ≃ (is_trunc (n .+1) A) :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ exact is_trunc_succ_intro},
{ intros H x y, apply is_trunc_eq},
{ intro H, cases H, apply idp},
{ intro P, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro a, apply eq_of_homotopy, intro b,
change is_trunc.mk (to_internal n (a = b)) = P a b,
induction (P a b), apply idp},
end
@[hott] lemma is_prop_is_trunc (n : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type u) : is_prop (is_trunc n A) :=
begin
induction n generalizing A,
{ apply is_trunc_equiv_closed,
{ apply is_contr.sigma_char },
apply is_prop.mk, intros,
fapply sigma_eq, apply x.2,
apply is_prop.elimo', apply pi.is_prop_pi_eq },
{ apply is_trunc_equiv_closed,
apply is_trunc.pi_char,
apply_instance },
end
local attribute [instance] is_prop_is_trunc
@[hott, instance] def is_trunc_succ_is_trunc (n m : ℕ₋₂) (A : Type u) :
is_trunc (n.+1) (is_trunc m A) :=
is_trunc_succ_of_is_prop (is_trunc m A) n
end is_trunc
end hott |
a29b01e9d303848dc29ea02431d844de20e4c563 | a7602958ab456501ff85db8cf5553f7bcab201d7 | /Notes/Logic_and_Proof/Chapter9/9.30.lean | feea34b58fadfc9ac8a8983ada68462961e9b9eb | [] | no_license | enlauren/math-logic | 081e2e737c8afb28dbb337968df95ead47321ba0 | 086b6935543d1841f1db92d0e49add1124054c37 | refs/heads/master | 1,594,506,621,950 | 1,558,634,976,000 | 1,558,634,976,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,492 | lean | -- 9.3 Using the existential quantifier
import init.data.nat
open nat
variable U : Type
variables A B : U → Prop
variable y: U
variable h: A(y)
-- ∃-introduction.
example: ∃ x, A x :=
exists.intro y h
-- You can see that we require some free variable |x|, such that some |A x| is
-- true. Then we simply |exists.intro| on the variable, and the proof of |A x|.
-- ∃-elimination.
-- The elimination rule follows directly from natural deduction. If we are
-- trying to prove |C|, from ∃ x, A(x), we introduce a new variable |y|, assume
-- |A(y)|, and prove |Q| from the assumption |A(y)|.
variable Q: Prop
variable h1: ∃ x, A(x)
variable h2: ∀ b, A(b) -> Q
-- See 9.30.jpg for the next two examples:
example: Q :=
show Q, from
exists.elim h1 ( -- Want to prove |Q|, from |h1|.
assume y: U, -- Assume a variable of type |U| (because A in |h1| operates on this).
assume h3: A(y), -- Assume A(y), for |h1|.
have h4: A(y) -> Q, from h2 y, -- ∀-elimination, by applying |h2| to our variable.
show Q, from h4 h3 -- Regular implication elimination.
)
-- Here's another example that uses both ∃-{intro, elim}
example : (∃ x, A(x) ∧ B(x)) → ∃ x, A(x) :=
assume h1: (∃ x, A(x) ∧ B(x)),
show ∃ x, A(x), from
exists.elim h1 (
assume y: U,
assume h2: A(y)∧B(y),
have h3: A(y), from and.left h2,
show ∃ x, A(x), from exists.intro y h3
)
-- And another! SEe 9.30-2.jpg for this example:
example : (∃ x, A x ∨ B x) → (∃ x, A x) ∨ (∃ x, B x) :=
assume h1: (∃ x, A x ∨ B x),
show (∃ x, A x) ∨ (∃ x, B x), from
exists.elim h1 (
assume y: U, -- This is important, and easy to forget in exists.elim.
assume h2: A(y) ∨ B(y),
show (∃ x, A x) ∨ (∃ x, B x), from
or.elim h2
(assume h3: A(y),
show (∃ x, A x) ∨ (∃ x, B x), from
have h4: (∃ x, A(x)), from exists.intro y h3,
or.inl h4)
(assume h3: B(y),
show (∃ x, A x) ∨ (∃ x, B x), from
have h4: (∃ x, B (x)), from exists.intro y h3,
or.inr h4)
)
-- Below is an example proof we did in ND, from Chapter 8:
example : (∀ x, A x → ¬ B x) → ¬ ∃ x, A x ∧ B x :=
assume h1: (∀ x, A x → ¬ B x),
assume h2: ∃ x, A x ∧ B x,
show false, from
exists.elim h2 (
assume y: U,
assume h3: A(y) ∧ B(y),
have h4: A(y) → ¬ B(y), from h1 y,
have h5: B(y), from and.right h3,
show false, from (h4 (and.left h3)) h5
) |
bbb41df135f6f2f7f1df50984b843b705eadce65 | 5ee26964f602030578ef0159d46145dd2e357ba5 | /src/for_mathlib/sheaves/presheaf_maps.lean | 188f6e050264d35552b195c7a8ad6fb06d04d868 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | fpvandoorn/lean-perfectoid-spaces | 569b4006fdfe491ca8b58dd817bb56138ada761f | 06cec51438b168837fc6e9268945735037fd1db6 | refs/heads/master | 1,590,154,571,918 | 1,557,685,392,000 | 1,557,685,392,000 | 186,363,547 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,557,730,933,000 | 1,557,730,933,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,182 | lean | /-
Continuous maps and presheaves.
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/008C
Author: Ramon Fernandez Mir
-/
import for_mathlib.sheaves.opens
import for_mathlib.sheaves.presheaf
universes u v w
open topological_space
variables {α : Type u} [topological_space α]
variables {β : Type v} [topological_space β]
variables {f : α → β} (Hf : continuous f)
-- f induces a functor PSh(α) ⟶ PSh(β).
namespace presheaf
section pushforward
def pushforward (F : presheaf α) : presheaf β :=
{ F := λ U, F (opens.comap Hf U),
res := λ U V HVU, F.res (opens.comap Hf U) (opens.comap Hf V) (opens.comap_mono Hf V U HVU),
Hid := λ U, F.Hid (opens.comap Hf U),
Hcomp := λ U V W HWV HVU,
F.Hcomp (opens.comap Hf U) (opens.comap Hf V) (opens.comap Hf W)
(opens.comap_mono Hf W V HWV) (opens.comap_mono Hf V U HVU), }
def pushforward.morphism (F G : presheaf α) (φ : F ⟶ G)
: pushforward Hf F ⟶ pushforward Hf G :=
{ map := λ U, φ.map (opens.comap Hf U),
commutes := λ U V HVU,
φ.commutes (opens.comap Hf U) (opens.comap Hf V) (opens.comap_mono Hf V U HVU), }
end pushforward
-- f induces a functor PSh(β) ⟶ PSh(α). Simplified to the case when f is open.
section pullback
variable (Hf' : ∀ (U : opens α), is_open (f '' U))
def pullback (F : presheaf β) : presheaf α :=
{ F := λ U, F (opens.map Hf' U),
res := λ U V HVU, F.res (opens.map Hf' U) (opens.map Hf' V) (opens.map_mono Hf' V U HVU),
Hid := λ U, F.Hid (opens.map Hf' U),
Hcomp := λ U V W HWV HVU,
F.Hcomp (opens.map Hf' U) (opens.map Hf' V) (opens.map Hf' W)
(opens.map_mono Hf' W V HWV) (opens.map_mono Hf' V U HVU), }
def pullback.morphism (F G : presheaf β) (φ : F ⟶ G) : pullback Hf' F ⟶ pullback Hf' G :=
{ map := λ U, φ.map (opens.map Hf' U),
commutes := λ U V HVU,
φ.commutes (opens.map Hf' U) (opens.map Hf' V) (opens.map_mono Hf' V U HVU), }
end pullback
-- f induces a `map` from a presheaf on β to a presheaf on α.
structure fmap (F : presheaf α) (G : presheaf β) :=
(map : ∀ (U), G U → F (opens.comap Hf U))
(commutes : ∀ (U V) (HVU : V ⊆ U),
(map V) ∘ (G.res U V HVU)
= (F.res (opens.comap Hf U) (opens.comap Hf V) (opens.comap_mono Hf V U HVU)) ∘ (map U))
namespace fmap
variables {γ : Type w} [topological_space γ]
variables {g : β → γ} {Hg : continuous g}
variable {Hf}
def comp {F : presheaf α} {G : presheaf β} {H : presheaf γ}
(f_ : fmap Hf F G) (g_ : fmap Hg G H) : fmap (continuous.comp Hf Hg) F H :=
{ map := λ U, (f_.map (opens.comap Hg U)) ∘ (g_.map U),
commutes :=
begin
intros U V HVU,
rw function.comp.assoc _ _ (H.res _ _ _),
rw g_.commutes,
rw ←function.comp.assoc _ _ (g_.map _),
rw f_.commutes,
refl,
end, }
def id (F : presheaf α) : fmap continuous_id F F :=
{ map := λ U,
begin
have HUU : opens.comap continuous_id U ⊆ U,
intros x Hx,
dsimp [opens.comap] at Hx,
exact Hx,
exact (F.res U (opens.comap continuous_id U) HUU),
end,
commutes :=
begin
intros U V HUV,
iterate 2 { rw ←F.Hcomp, },
end, }
end fmap
end presheaf
|
084b57948f5e9058bc102c0de84b3ed341f7e210 | 957a80ea22c5abb4f4670b250d55534d9db99108 | /tests/lean/structure_instance_bug3.lean | 8c4562a8c65f610616e79a82de3f2185d67e6db2 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | GaloisInc/lean | aa1e64d604051e602fcf4610061314b9a37ab8cd | f1ec117a24459b59c6ff9e56a1d09d9e9e60a6c0 | refs/heads/master | 1,592,202,909,807 | 1,504,624,387,000 | 1,504,624,387,000 | 75,319,626 | 2 | 1 | Apache-2.0 | 1,539,290,164,000 | 1,480,616,104,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 25 | lean | example : monad set := {} |
fc002f0bd435cef931a0a368d139525367da2125 | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/autobound_and_macroscopes.lean | 60409397cd3b4bc1b0d3ccb088825a146963a645 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 58 | lean | macro "A" : term => `(id x)
theorem test : A = A := sorry
|
ddafb04bbe64372963ad595575896835fc2e24ba | 53618200bef52920c1e974173f78cd378d268f3e | /hott/types/eq.hlean | 2178c2d1ce50adb4270c5c04e31ee276e53af536 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | sayantangkhan/lean2 | cc41e61102e0fcc8b65e8501186dcca40b19b22e | 0fc0378969678eec25ea425a426bb48a184a6db0 | refs/heads/master | 1,590,323,112,724 | 1,489,425,932,000 | 1,489,425,932,000 | 84,854,525 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,489,425,509,000 | 1,489,425,509,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 21,787 | hlean | /-
Copyright (c) 2014 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Floris van Doorn
Partially ported from Coq HoTT
Theorems about path types (identity types)
-/
import types.sigma
open eq sigma sigma.ops equiv is_equiv is_trunc
namespace eq
/- Path spaces -/
section
variables {A B : Type} {a a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ a' : A} {b b1 b2 : B} {f g : A → B} {h : B → A}
{p p' p'' : a₁ = a₂}
/- The path spaces of a path space are not, of course, determined; they are just the
higher-dimensional structure of the original space. -/
/- some lemmas about whiskering or other higher paths -/
theorem whisker_left_con_right (p : a₁ = a₂) {q q' q'' : a₂ = a₃} (r : q = q') (s : q' = q'')
: whisker_left p (r ⬝ s) = whisker_left p r ⬝ whisker_left p s :=
begin
induction p, induction r, induction s, reflexivity
end
theorem whisker_right_con_right (q : a₂ = a₃) (r : p = p') (s : p' = p'')
: whisker_right q (r ⬝ s) = whisker_right q r ⬝ whisker_right q s :=
begin
induction q, induction r, induction s, reflexivity
end
theorem whisker_left_con_left (p : a₁ = a₂) (p' : a₂ = a₃) {q q' : a₃ = a₄} (r : q = q')
: whisker_left (p ⬝ p') r = !con.assoc ⬝ whisker_left p (whisker_left p' r) ⬝ !con.assoc' :=
begin
induction p', induction p, induction r, induction q, reflexivity
end
theorem whisker_right_con_left {p p' : a₁ = a₂} (q : a₂ = a₃) (q' : a₃ = a₄) (r : p = p')
: whisker_right (q ⬝ q') r = !con.assoc' ⬝ whisker_right q' (whisker_right q r) ⬝ !con.assoc :=
begin
induction q', induction q, induction r, induction p, reflexivity
end
theorem whisker_left_inv_left (p : a₂ = a₁) {q q' : a₂ = a₃} (r : q = q')
: !con_inv_cancel_left⁻¹ ⬝ whisker_left p (whisker_left p⁻¹ r) ⬝ !con_inv_cancel_left = r :=
begin
induction p, induction r, induction q, reflexivity
end
theorem whisker_left_inv (p : a₁ = a₂) {q q' : a₂ = a₃} (r : q = q')
: whisker_left p r⁻¹ = (whisker_left p r)⁻¹ :=
by induction r; reflexivity
theorem whisker_right_inv {p p' : a₁ = a₂} (q : a₂ = a₃) (r : p = p')
: whisker_right q r⁻¹ = (whisker_right q r)⁻¹ :=
by induction r; reflexivity
theorem ap_eq_apd10 {B : A → Type} {f g : Πa, B a} (p : f = g) (a : A) :
ap (λh, h a) p = apd10 p a :=
by induction p; reflexivity
theorem inverse2_right_inv (r : p = p') : r ◾ inverse2 r ⬝ con.right_inv p' = con.right_inv p :=
by induction r;induction p;reflexivity
theorem inverse2_left_inv (r : p = p') : inverse2 r ◾ r ⬝ con.left_inv p' = con.left_inv p :=
by induction r;induction p;reflexivity
theorem ap_con_right_inv (f : A → B) (p : a₁ = a₂)
: ap_con f p p⁻¹ ⬝ whisker_left _ (ap_inv f p) ⬝ con.right_inv (ap f p)
= ap (ap f) (con.right_inv p) :=
by induction p;reflexivity
theorem ap_con_left_inv (f : A → B) (p : a₁ = a₂)
: ap_con f p⁻¹ p ⬝ whisker_right _ (ap_inv f p) ⬝ con.left_inv (ap f p)
= ap (ap f) (con.left_inv p) :=
by induction p;reflexivity
theorem idp_con_whisker_left {q q' : a₂ = a₃} (r : q = q') :
!idp_con⁻¹ ⬝ whisker_left idp r = r ⬝ !idp_con⁻¹ :=
by induction r;induction q;reflexivity
theorem whisker_left_idp_con {q q' : a₂ = a₃} (r : q = q') :
whisker_left idp r ⬝ !idp_con = !idp_con ⬝ r :=
by induction r;induction q;reflexivity
theorem idp_con_idp {p : a = a} (q : p = idp) : idp_con p ⬝ q = ap (λp, idp ⬝ p) q :=
by cases q;reflexivity
definition ap_is_constant [unfold 8] {A B : Type} {f : A → B} {b : B} (p : Πx, f x = b)
{x y : A} (q : x = y) : ap f q = p x ⬝ (p y)⁻¹ :=
by induction q;exact !con.right_inv⁻¹
definition inv2_inv {p q : a = a'} (r : p = q) : inverse2 r⁻¹ = (inverse2 r)⁻¹ :=
by induction r;reflexivity
definition inv2_con {p p' p'' : a = a'} (r : p = p') (r' : p' = p'')
: inverse2 (r ⬝ r') = inverse2 r ⬝ inverse2 r' :=
by induction r';induction r;reflexivity
definition con2_inv {p₁ q₁ : a₁ = a₂} {p₂ q₂ : a₂ = a₃} (r₁ : p₁ = q₁) (r₂ : p₂ = q₂)
: (r₁ ◾ r₂)⁻¹ = r₁⁻¹ ◾ r₂⁻¹ :=
by induction r₁;induction r₂;reflexivity
theorem eq_con_inv_of_con_eq_whisker_left {A : Type} {a a₂ a₃ : A}
{p : a = a₂} {q q' : a₂ = a₃} {r : a = a₃} (s' : q = q') (s : p ⬝ q' = r) :
eq_con_inv_of_con_eq (whisker_left p s' ⬝ s)
= eq_con_inv_of_con_eq s ⬝ whisker_left r (inverse2 s')⁻¹ :=
by induction s';induction q;induction s;reflexivity
theorem right_inv_eq_idp {A : Type} {a : A} {p : a = a} (r : p = idpath a) :
con.right_inv p = r ◾ inverse2 r :=
by cases r;reflexivity
/- Transporting in path spaces.
There are potentially a lot of these lemmas, so we adopt a uniform naming scheme:
- `l` means the left endpoint varies
- `r` means the right endpoint varies
- `F` means application of a function to that (varying) endpoint.
-/
definition eq_transport_l (p : a₁ = a₂) (q : a₁ = a₃)
: transport (λx, x = a₃) p q = p⁻¹ ⬝ q :=
by induction p; induction q; reflexivity
definition eq_transport_r (p : a₂ = a₃) (q : a₁ = a₂)
: transport (λx, a₁ = x) p q = q ⬝ p :=
by induction p; induction q; reflexivity
definition eq_transport_lr (p : a₁ = a₂) (q : a₁ = a₁)
: transport (λx, x = x) p q = p⁻¹ ⬝ q ⬝ p :=
by induction p; rewrite [▸*,idp_con]
definition eq_transport_Fl (p : a₁ = a₂) (q : f a₁ = b)
: transport (λx, f x = b) p q = (ap f p)⁻¹ ⬝ q :=
by induction p; induction q; reflexivity
definition eq_transport_Fr (p : a₁ = a₂) (q : b = f a₁)
: transport (λx, b = f x) p q = q ⬝ (ap f p) :=
by induction p; reflexivity
definition eq_transport_FlFr (p : a₁ = a₂) (q : f a₁ = g a₁)
: transport (λx, f x = g x) p q = (ap f p)⁻¹ ⬝ q ⬝ (ap g p) :=
by induction p; rewrite [▸*,idp_con]
definition eq_transport_FlFr_D {B : A → Type} {f g : Πa, B a}
(p : a₁ = a₂) (q : f a₁ = g a₁)
: transport (λx, f x = g x) p q = (apdt f p)⁻¹ ⬝ ap (transport B p) q ⬝ (apdt g p) :=
by induction p; rewrite [▸*,idp_con,ap_id]
definition eq_transport_FFlr (p : a₁ = a₂) (q : h (f a₁) = a₁)
: transport (λx, h (f x) = x) p q = (ap h (ap f p))⁻¹ ⬝ q ⬝ p :=
by induction p; rewrite [▸*,idp_con]
definition eq_transport_lFFr (p : a₁ = a₂) (q : a₁ = h (f a₁))
: transport (λx, x = h (f x)) p q = p⁻¹ ⬝ q ⬝ (ap h (ap f p)) :=
by induction p; rewrite [▸*,idp_con]
/- Pathovers -/
-- In the comment we give the fibration of the pathover
-- we should probably try to do everything just with pathover_eq (defined in cubical.square),
-- the following definitions may be removed in future.
definition eq_pathover_l (p : a₁ = a₂) (q : a₁ = a₃) : q =[p] p⁻¹ ⬝ q := /-(λx, x = a₃)-/
by induction p; induction q; exact idpo
definition eq_pathover_r (p : a₂ = a₃) (q : a₁ = a₂) : q =[p] q ⬝ p := /-(λx, a₁ = x)-/
by induction p; induction q; exact idpo
definition eq_pathover_lr (p : a₁ = a₂) (q : a₁ = a₁) : q =[p] p⁻¹ ⬝ q ⬝ p := /-(λx, x = x)-/
by induction p; rewrite [▸*,idp_con]; exact idpo
definition eq_pathover_Fl (p : a₁ = a₂) (q : f a₁ = b) : q =[p] (ap f p)⁻¹ ⬝ q := /-(λx, f x = b)-/
by induction p; induction q; exact idpo
definition eq_pathover_Fl' (p : a₁ = a₂) (q : f a₂ = b) : (ap f p) ⬝ q =[p] q := /-(λx, f x = b)-/
by induction p; induction q; exact idpo
definition eq_pathover_Fr (p : a₁ = a₂) (q : b = f a₁) : q =[p] q ⬝ (ap f p) := /-(λx, b = f x)-/
by induction p; exact idpo
definition eq_pathover_FlFr (p : a₁ = a₂) (q : f a₁ = g a₁) : q =[p] (ap f p)⁻¹ ⬝ q ⬝ (ap g p) :=
/-(λx, f x = g x)-/
by induction p; rewrite [▸*,idp_con]; exact idpo
definition eq_pathover_FlFr_D {B : A → Type} {f g : Πa, B a} (p : a₁ = a₂) (q : f a₁ = g a₁)
: q =[p] (apdt f p)⁻¹ ⬝ ap (transport B p) q ⬝ (apdt g p) := /-(λx, f x = g x)-/
by induction p; rewrite [▸*,idp_con,ap_id];exact idpo
definition eq_pathover_FFlr (p : a₁ = a₂) (q : h (f a₁) = a₁) : q =[p] (ap h (ap f p))⁻¹ ⬝ q ⬝ p :=
/-(λx, h (f x) = x)-/
by induction p; rewrite [▸*,idp_con];exact idpo
definition eq_pathover_lFFr (p : a₁ = a₂) (q : a₁ = h (f a₁)) : q =[p] p⁻¹ ⬝ q ⬝ (ap h (ap f p)) :=
/-(λx, x = h (f x))-/
by induction p; rewrite [▸*,idp_con];exact idpo
definition eq_pathover_r_idp (p : a₁ = a₂) : idp =[p] p := /-(λx, a₁ = x)-/
by induction p; exact idpo
definition eq_pathover_l_idp (p : a₁ = a₂) : idp =[p] p⁻¹ := /-(λx, x = a₁)-/
by induction p; exact idpo
definition eq_pathover_l_idp' (p : a₁ = a₂) : idp =[p⁻¹] p := /-(λx, x = a₂)-/
by induction p; exact idpo
-- The Functorial action of paths is [ap].
/- Equivalences between path spaces -/
/- [is_equiv_ap] is in init.equiv -/
definition equiv_ap [constructor] (f : A → B) [H : is_equiv f] (a₁ a₂ : A)
: (a₁ = a₂) ≃ (f a₁ = f a₂) :=
equiv.mk (ap f) _
/- Path operations are equivalences -/
definition is_equiv_eq_inverse [constructor] (a₁ a₂ : A)
: is_equiv (inverse : a₁ = a₂ → a₂ = a₁) :=
is_equiv.mk inverse inverse inv_inv inv_inv (λp, eq.rec_on p idp)
local attribute is_equiv_eq_inverse [instance]
definition eq_equiv_eq_symm [constructor] (a₁ a₂ : A) : (a₁ = a₂) ≃ (a₂ = a₁) :=
equiv.mk inverse _
definition is_equiv_concat_left [constructor] [instance] (p : a₁ = a₂) (a₃ : A)
: is_equiv (concat p : a₂ = a₃ → a₁ = a₃) :=
is_equiv.mk (concat p) (concat p⁻¹)
(con_inv_cancel_left p)
(inv_con_cancel_left p)
abstract (λq, by induction p;induction q;reflexivity) end
local attribute is_equiv_concat_left [instance]
definition equiv_eq_closed_left [constructor] (a₃ : A) (p : a₁ = a₂) : (a₁ = a₃) ≃ (a₂ = a₃) :=
equiv.mk (concat p⁻¹) _
definition is_equiv_concat_right [constructor] [instance] (p : a₂ = a₃) (a₁ : A)
: is_equiv (λq : a₁ = a₂, q ⬝ p) :=
is_equiv.mk (λq, q ⬝ p) (λq, q ⬝ p⁻¹)
(λq, inv_con_cancel_right q p)
(λq, con_inv_cancel_right q p)
(λq, by induction p;induction q;reflexivity)
local attribute is_equiv_concat_right [instance]
definition equiv_eq_closed_right [constructor] (a₁ : A) (p : a₂ = a₃) : (a₁ = a₂) ≃ (a₁ = a₃) :=
equiv.mk (λq, q ⬝ p) _
definition eq_equiv_eq_closed [constructor] (p : a₁ = a₂) (q : a₃ = a₄) : (a₁ = a₃) ≃ (a₂ = a₄) :=
equiv.trans (equiv_eq_closed_left a₃ p) (equiv_eq_closed_right a₂ q)
definition loop_equiv_eq_closed [constructor] {A : Type} {a a' : A} (p : a = a')
: (a = a) ≃ (a' = a') :=
eq_equiv_eq_closed p p
definition is_equiv_whisker_left [constructor] (p : a₁ = a₂) (q r : a₂ = a₃)
: is_equiv (whisker_left p : q = r → p ⬝ q = p ⬝ r) :=
begin
fapply adjointify,
{intro s, apply (!cancel_left s)},
{intro s,
apply concat, {apply whisker_left_con_right},
apply concat, rotate_left 1, apply (whisker_left_inv_left p s),
apply concat2,
{apply concat, {apply whisker_left_con_right},
apply concat2,
{induction p, induction q, reflexivity},
{reflexivity}},
{induction p, induction r, reflexivity}},
{intro s, induction s, induction q, induction p, reflexivity}
end
definition eq_equiv_con_eq_con_left [constructor] (p : a₁ = a₂) (q r : a₂ = a₃)
: (q = r) ≃ (p ⬝ q = p ⬝ r) :=
equiv.mk _ !is_equiv_whisker_left
definition is_equiv_whisker_right [constructor] {p q : a₁ = a₂} (r : a₂ = a₃)
: is_equiv (λs, whisker_right r s : p = q → p ⬝ r = q ⬝ r) :=
begin
fapply adjointify,
{intro s, apply (!cancel_right s)},
{intro s, induction r, cases s, induction q, reflexivity},
{intro s, induction s, induction r, induction p, reflexivity}
end
definition eq_equiv_con_eq_con_right [constructor] (p q : a₁ = a₂) (r : a₂ = a₃)
: (p = q) ≃ (p ⬝ r = q ⬝ r) :=
equiv.mk _ !is_equiv_whisker_right
/-
The following proofs can be simplified a bit by concatenating previous equivalences.
However, these proofs have the advantage that the inverse is definitionally equal to
what we would expect
-/
definition is_equiv_con_eq_of_eq_inv_con [constructor] (p : a₁ = a₃) (q : a₂ = a₃) (r : a₂ = a₁)
: is_equiv (con_eq_of_eq_inv_con : p = r⁻¹ ⬝ q → r ⬝ p = q) :=
begin
fapply adjointify,
{ apply eq_inv_con_of_con_eq},
{ intro s, induction r, rewrite [↑[con_eq_of_eq_inv_con,eq_inv_con_of_con_eq],
con.assoc,con.assoc,con.left_inv,▸*,-con.assoc,con.right_inv,▸* at *,idp_con s]},
{ intro s, induction r, rewrite [↑[con_eq_of_eq_inv_con,eq_inv_con_of_con_eq],
con.assoc,con.assoc,con.right_inv,▸*,-con.assoc,con.left_inv,▸* at *,idp_con s] },
end
definition eq_inv_con_equiv_con_eq [constructor] (p : a₁ = a₃) (q : a₂ = a₃) (r : a₂ = a₁)
: (p = r⁻¹ ⬝ q) ≃ (r ⬝ p = q) :=
equiv.mk _ !is_equiv_con_eq_of_eq_inv_con
definition is_equiv_con_eq_of_eq_con_inv [constructor] (p : a₁ = a₃) (q : a₂ = a₃) (r : a₂ = a₁)
: is_equiv (con_eq_of_eq_con_inv : r = q ⬝ p⁻¹ → r ⬝ p = q) :=
begin
fapply adjointify,
{ apply eq_con_inv_of_con_eq},
{ intro s, induction p, rewrite [↑[con_eq_of_eq_con_inv,eq_con_inv_of_con_eq]]},
{ intro s, induction p, rewrite [↑[con_eq_of_eq_con_inv,eq_con_inv_of_con_eq]] },
end
definition eq_con_inv_equiv_con_eq [constructor] (p : a₁ = a₃) (q : a₂ = a₃) (r : a₂ = a₁)
: (r = q ⬝ p⁻¹) ≃ (r ⬝ p = q) :=
equiv.mk _ !is_equiv_con_eq_of_eq_con_inv
definition is_equiv_inv_con_eq_of_eq_con [constructor] (p : a₁ = a₃) (q : a₂ = a₃) (r : a₁ = a₂)
: is_equiv (inv_con_eq_of_eq_con : p = r ⬝ q → r⁻¹ ⬝ p = q) :=
begin
fapply adjointify,
{ apply eq_con_of_inv_con_eq},
{ intro s, induction r, rewrite [↑[inv_con_eq_of_eq_con,eq_con_of_inv_con_eq],
con.assoc,con.assoc,con.left_inv,▸*,-con.assoc,con.right_inv,▸* at *,idp_con s]},
{ intro s, induction r, rewrite [↑[inv_con_eq_of_eq_con,eq_con_of_inv_con_eq],
con.assoc,con.assoc,con.right_inv,▸*,-con.assoc,con.left_inv,▸* at *,idp_con s] },
end
definition eq_con_equiv_inv_con_eq [constructor] (p : a₁ = a₃) (q : a₂ = a₃) (r : a₁ = a₂)
: (p = r ⬝ q) ≃ (r⁻¹ ⬝ p = q) :=
equiv.mk _ !is_equiv_inv_con_eq_of_eq_con
definition is_equiv_con_inv_eq_of_eq_con [constructor] (p : a₃ = a₁) (q : a₂ = a₃) (r : a₂ = a₁)
: is_equiv (con_inv_eq_of_eq_con : r = q ⬝ p → r ⬝ p⁻¹ = q) :=
begin
fapply adjointify,
{ apply eq_con_of_con_inv_eq},
{ intro s, induction p, rewrite [↑[con_inv_eq_of_eq_con,eq_con_of_con_inv_eq]]},
{ intro s, induction p, rewrite [↑[con_inv_eq_of_eq_con,eq_con_of_con_inv_eq]] },
end
definition eq_con_equiv_con_inv_eq (p : a₃ = a₁) (q : a₂ = a₃) (r : a₂ = a₁)
: (r = q ⬝ p) ≃ (r ⬝ p⁻¹ = q) :=
equiv.mk _ !is_equiv_con_inv_eq_of_eq_con
local attribute is_equiv_inv_con_eq_of_eq_con
is_equiv_con_inv_eq_of_eq_con
is_equiv_con_eq_of_eq_con_inv
is_equiv_con_eq_of_eq_inv_con [instance]
definition is_equiv_eq_con_of_inv_con_eq (p : a₁ = a₃) (q : a₂ = a₃) (r : a₂ = a₁)
: is_equiv (eq_con_of_inv_con_eq : r⁻¹ ⬝ q = p → q = r ⬝ p) :=
is_equiv_inv inv_con_eq_of_eq_con
definition is_equiv_eq_con_of_con_inv_eq (p : a₁ = a₃) (q : a₂ = a₃) (r : a₂ = a₁)
: is_equiv (eq_con_of_con_inv_eq : q ⬝ p⁻¹ = r → q = r ⬝ p) :=
is_equiv_inv con_inv_eq_of_eq_con
definition is_equiv_eq_con_inv_of_con_eq (p : a₁ = a₃) (q : a₂ = a₃) (r : a₂ = a₁)
: is_equiv (eq_con_inv_of_con_eq : r ⬝ p = q → r = q ⬝ p⁻¹) :=
is_equiv_inv con_eq_of_eq_con_inv
definition is_equiv_eq_inv_con_of_con_eq (p : a₁ = a₃) (q : a₂ = a₃) (r : a₂ = a₁)
: is_equiv (eq_inv_con_of_con_eq : r ⬝ p = q → p = r⁻¹ ⬝ q) :=
is_equiv_inv con_eq_of_eq_inv_con
definition is_equiv_con_inv_eq_idp [constructor] (p q : a₁ = a₂)
: is_equiv (con_inv_eq_idp : p = q → p ⬝ q⁻¹ = idp) :=
begin
fapply adjointify,
{ apply eq_of_con_inv_eq_idp},
{ intro s, induction q, esimp at *, cases s, reflexivity},
{ intro s, induction s, induction p, reflexivity},
end
definition is_equiv_inv_con_eq_idp [constructor] (p q : a₁ = a₂)
: is_equiv (inv_con_eq_idp : p = q → q⁻¹ ⬝ p = idp) :=
begin
fapply adjointify,
{ apply eq_of_inv_con_eq_idp},
{ intro s, induction q, esimp [eq_of_inv_con_eq_idp] at *,
eapply is_equiv_rect (eq_equiv_con_eq_con_left idp p idp), clear s,
intro s, cases s, reflexivity},
{ intro s, induction s, induction p, reflexivity},
end
definition eq_equiv_con_inv_eq_idp [constructor] (p q : a₁ = a₂) : (p = q) ≃ (p ⬝ q⁻¹ = idp) :=
equiv.mk _ !is_equiv_con_inv_eq_idp
definition eq_equiv_inv_con_eq_idp [constructor] (p q : a₁ = a₂) : (p = q) ≃ (q⁻¹ ⬝ p = idp) :=
equiv.mk _ !is_equiv_inv_con_eq_idp
/- Pathover Equivalences -/
definition eq_pathover_equiv_l (p : a₁ = a₂) (q : a₁ = a₃) (r : a₂ = a₃) : q =[p] r ≃ q = p ⬝ r :=
/-(λx, x = a₃)-/
by induction p; exact !pathover_idp ⬝e !equiv_eq_closed_right !idp_con⁻¹
definition eq_pathover_equiv_r (p : a₂ = a₃) (q : a₁ = a₂) (r : a₁ = a₃) : q =[p] r ≃ q ⬝ p = r :=
/-(λx, a₁ = x)-/
by induction p; apply pathover_idp
definition eq_pathover_equiv_lr (p : a₁ = a₂) (q : a₁ = a₁) (r : a₂ = a₂)
: q =[p] r ≃ q ⬝ p = p ⬝ r := /-(λx, x = x)-/
by induction p; exact !pathover_idp ⬝e !equiv_eq_closed_right !idp_con⁻¹
definition eq_pathover_equiv_Fl (p : a₁ = a₂) (q : f a₁ = b) (r : f a₂ = b)
: q =[p] r ≃ q = ap f p ⬝ r := /-(λx, f x = b)-/
by induction p; exact !pathover_idp ⬝e !equiv_eq_closed_right !idp_con⁻¹
definition eq_pathover_equiv_Fr (p : a₁ = a₂) (q : b = f a₁) (r : b = f a₂)
: q =[p] r ≃ q ⬝ ap f p = r := /-(λx, b = f x)-/
by induction p; apply pathover_idp
definition eq_pathover_equiv_FlFr (p : a₁ = a₂) (q : f a₁ = g a₁) (r : f a₂ = g a₂)
: q =[p] r ≃ q ⬝ ap g p = ap f p ⬝ r := /-(λx, f x = g x)-/
by induction p; exact !pathover_idp ⬝e !equiv_eq_closed_right !idp_con⁻¹
definition eq_pathover_equiv_FFlr (p : a₁ = a₂) (q : h (f a₁) = a₁) (r : h (f a₂) = a₂)
: q =[p] r ≃ q ⬝ p = ap h (ap f p) ⬝ r :=
/-(λx, h (f x) = x)-/
by induction p; exact !pathover_idp ⬝e !equiv_eq_closed_right !idp_con⁻¹
definition eq_pathover_equiv_lFFr (p : a₁ = a₂) (q : a₁ = h (f a₁)) (r : a₂ = h (f a₂))
: q =[p] r ≃ q ⬝ ap h (ap f p) = p ⬝ r :=
/-(λx, x = h (f x))-/
by induction p; exact !pathover_idp ⬝e !equiv_eq_closed_right !idp_con⁻¹
-- a lot of this library still needs to be ported from Coq HoTT
-- the behavior of equality in other types is described in the corresponding type files
-- encode decode method
open is_trunc
definition encode_decode_method' (a₀ a : A) (code : A → Type) (c₀ : code a₀)
(decode : Π(a : A) (c : code a), a₀ = a)
(encode_decode : Π(a : A) (c : code a), c₀ =[decode a c] c)
(decode_encode : decode a₀ c₀ = idp) : (a₀ = a) ≃ code a :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ intro p, exact p ▸ c₀},
{ apply decode},
{ intro c, apply tr_eq_of_pathover, apply encode_decode},
{ intro p, induction p, apply decode_encode},
end
end
section
parameters {A : Type} (a₀ : A) (code : A → Type) (H : is_contr (Σa, code a))
(p : (center (Σa, code a)).1 = a₀)
include p
protected definition encode {a : A} (q : a₀ = a) : code a :=
(p ⬝ q) ▸ (center (Σa, code a)).2
protected definition decode' {a : A} (c : code a) : a₀ = a :=
(is_prop.elim ⟨a₀, encode idp⟩ ⟨a, c⟩)..1
protected definition decode {a : A} (c : code a) : a₀ = a :=
(decode' (encode idp))⁻¹ ⬝ decode' c
definition total_space_method (a : A) : (a₀ = a) ≃ code a :=
begin
fapply equiv.MK,
{ exact encode},
{ exact decode},
{ intro c,
unfold [encode, decode, decode'],
induction p, esimp, rewrite [is_prop_elim_self,▸*,+idp_con],
apply tr_eq_of_pathover,
eapply @sigma.rec_on _ _ (λx, x.2 =[(is_prop.elim ⟨x.1, x.2⟩ ⟨a, c⟩)..1] c)
(center (sigma code)),
intro a c, apply eq_pr2},
{ intro q, induction q, esimp, apply con.left_inv, },
end
end
definition encode_decode_method {A : Type} (a₀ a : A) (code : A → Type) (c₀ : code a₀)
(decode : Π(a : A) (c : code a), a₀ = a)
(encode_decode : Π(a : A) (c : code a), c₀ =[decode a c] c) : (a₀ = a) ≃ code a :=
begin
fapply total_space_method,
{ fapply @is_contr.mk,
{ exact ⟨a₀, c₀⟩},
{ intro p, fapply sigma_eq,
apply decode, exact p.2,
apply encode_decode}},
{ reflexivity}
end
end eq
|
f306cb6d1382e80d12842a810bdfa02883bdb7ba | 9be442d9ec2fcf442516ed6e9e1660aa9071b7bd | /tests/playground/matchEqs.lean | a4c5186d624bc6c2e8c5ebf0a73cd6b6460f305f | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | EdAyers/lean4 | 57ac632d6b0789cb91fab2170e8c9e40441221bd | 37ba0df5841bde51dbc2329da81ac23d4f6a4de4 | refs/heads/master | 1,676,463,245,298 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 1,660,619,433,000 | 183,433,437 | 1 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,657,612,672,000 | 1,556,196,574,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,482 | lean | import Lean
syntax (name := test) "test%" ident : command
open Lean.Elab
open Lean.Elab.Command
@[commandElab test] def elabTest : CommandElab := fun stx => do
let id ← resolveGlobalConstNoOverloadWithInfo stx[1]
liftTermElabM none do
Lean.Meta.Match.mkEquationsFor id
return ()
def f (xs ys : List String) : Nat :=
match xs, ys with
| [], [] => 0
| _, ["abc"] => 1
| _, x::xs => xs.length
| _, _ => 2
def h (x y : Nat) : Nat :=
match x, y with
| 10000, _ => 0
| 10001, _ => 5
| _, 20000 => 4
| x+1, _ => 3
| Nat.zero, y+1 => 44
| _, _ => 1
theorem ex1 : h 10000 1 = 0 := rfl
theorem ex2 : h 10002 1 = 3 := rfl
-- set_option trace.Meta.debug true
-- set_option pp.proofs true
-- set_option trace.Meta.debug truen
set_option trace.Meta.Match.matchEqs true in
test% f.match_1
#check @f.match_1.eq_1
#check @f.match_1.eq_2
#check @f.match_1.eq_3
#check @f.match_1.eq_4
#check @f.match_1.splitter
test% h.match_1
#check @h.match_1.eq_1
#check @h.match_1.eq_2
#check @h.match_1.eq_3
#check @h.match_1.eq_4
#check @h.match_1.eq_5
#check @h.match_1.eq_6
#check @h.match_1.splitter
def g (xs ys : List (Nat × String)) : Nat :=
match xs, ys with
| _, [(a,b)] => 0
| [(c, d)], _ => 1
| _, _ => 2
set_option pp.analyze false
set_option pp.proofs true
set_option trace.Meta.Match.matchEqs true in
test% g.match_1
#check @g.match_1.eq_1
#check @g.match_1.eq_2
#check @g.match_1.eq_3
#check @g.match_1.splitter
|
071763854379d1e8c96e45390646487ce85b7a74 | e030b0259b777fedcdf73dd966f3f1556d392178 | /library/init/category/combinators.lean | c33c6532ac06cf97cc1f121b804087219f418358 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | fgdorais/lean | 17b46a095b70b21fa0790ce74876658dc5faca06 | c3b7c54d7cca7aaa25328f0a5660b6b75fe26055 | refs/heads/master | 1,611,523,590,686 | 1,484,412,902,000 | 1,484,412,902,000 | 38,489,734 | 0 | 0 | null | 1,435,923,380,000 | 1,435,923,379,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,191 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
Monad combinators, as in Haskell's Control.Monad.
-/
prelude
import init.category.monad init.data.list.basic
universe variables u v w
namespace monad
/- Remark: we use (u+1) to make sure β is not a proposition.
That is, we are making sure that β and (list β) inhabit the same universe -/
def mapm {m : Type (u+1) → Type v} [monad m] {α : Type w} {β : Type (u+1)} (f : α → m β) : list α → m (list β)
| [] := return []
| (h :: t) := do h' ← f h, t' ← mapm t, return (h' :: t')
def mapm' {m : Type → Type v} [monad m] {α : Type u} {β : Type} (f : α → m β) : list α → m unit
| [] := return ()
| (h :: t) := f h >> mapm' t
def for {m : Type (u+1) → Type v} [monad m] {α : Type w} {β : Type (u+1)} (l : list α) (f : α → m β) : m (list β) :=
mapm f l
def for' {m : Type → Type v} [monad m] {α : Type u} {β : Type} (l : list α) (f : α → m β) : m unit :=
mapm' f l
def sequence {m : Type (u+1) → Type v} [monad m] {α : Type (u+1)} : list (m α) → m (list α)
| [] := return []
| (h :: t) := do h' ← h, t' ← sequence t, return (h' :: t')
def sequence' {m : Type → Type u} [monad m] {α : Type} : list (m α) → m unit
| [] := return ()
| (h :: t) := h >> sequence' t
infix ` =<< `:2 := λ u v, v >>= u
infix ` >=> `:2 := λ s t a, s a >>= t
infix ` <=< `:2 := λ t s a, s a >>= t
def join {m : Type u → Type u} [monad m] {α : Type u} (a : m (m α)) : m α :=
bind a id
def filter {m : Type → Type v} [monad m] {α : Type} (f : α → m bool) : list α → m (list α)
| [] := return []
| (h :: t) := do b ← f h, t' ← filter t, cond b (return (h :: t')) (return t')
def whenb {m : Type → Type} [monad m] (b : bool) (t : m unit) : m unit :=
cond b t (return ())
def unlessb {m : Type → Type} [monad m] (b : bool) (t : m unit) : m unit :=
cond b (return ()) t
def cond {m : Type → Type} [monad m] {α : Type} (mbool : m bool)
(tm fm : m α) : m α :=
do b ← mbool, cond b tm fm
def lift {m : Type u → Type v} [monad m] {α φ : Type u} (f : α → φ) (ma : m α) : m φ :=
do a ← ma, return (f a)
def lift₂ {m : Type u → Type v} [monad m] {α φ : Type u} (f : α → α → φ) (ma₁ ma₂: m α) : m φ :=
do a₁ ← ma₁, a₂ ← ma₂, return (f a₁ a₂)
def lift₃ {m : Type u → Type v} [monad m] {α φ : Type u} (f : α → α → α → φ)
(ma₁ ma₂ ma₃ : m α) : m φ :=
do a₁ ← ma₁, a₂ ← ma₂, a₃ ← ma₃, return (f a₁ a₂ a₃)
def lift₄ {m : Type u → Type v} [monad m] {α φ : Type u} (f : α → α → α → α → φ)
(ma₁ ma₂ ma₃ ma₄ : m α) : m φ :=
do a₁ ← ma₁, a₂ ← ma₂, a₃ ← ma₃, a₄ ← ma₄, return (f a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄)
def lift₅ {m : Type u → Type v} [monad m] {α φ : Type u} (f : α → α → α → α → α → φ)
(ma₁ ma₂ ma₃ ma₄ ma₅ : m α) : m φ :=
do a₁ ← ma₁, a₂ ← ma₂, a₃ ← ma₃, a₄ ← ma₄, a₅ ← ma₅, return (f a₁ a₂ a₃ a₄ a₅)
end monad
|
fd1d4a75e3bdcac859b5099b3ef76343f0011c20 | 2fb7334a212c3858db44039b5fa6cd57fd5d1443 | /src/sites.lean | a1d1571d54c1adb4b171e948ae2dbfce24a0e76a | [] | no_license | ImperialCollegeLondon/condensed-sets | 24514be041533b07fd62d337b1d6a5ce2b09c78c | e308291646396003dbed3896e5fbb40cb57c7050 | refs/heads/master | 1,628,397,992,041 | 1,601,549,576,000 | 1,601,549,576,000 | 224,198,323 | 3 | 1 | null | 1,601,549,578,000 | 1,574,774,780,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,239 | lean | import category_theory.opposites
import category_theory.limits.shapes.products
import category_theory.limits.shapes.pullbacks
import sieve
namespace category_theory
namespace category_theory.limits
section topologies
universes v u
variables (C : Type u) [category.{v} C]
-- SGA 4 II Def 1.1.
structure grothendieck_topology :=
(coverings : Π (X : C), set (sieve.{v} X))
(base_change : ∀ (X Y : C) (S : sieve.{v} X) (f : Y ⟶ X),
S ∈ coverings X → (pullback_sieve f S) ∈ coverings Y)
(local_character : ∀ (X : C) (S T : sieve.{v} X) (_ : S ∈ coverings X),
(∀ (Y : C) (f : Y ⟶ X) (_ : f ∈ S.map Y),
(pullback_sieve f T) ∈ coverings Y) → T ∈ coverings X)
(id : ∀ (X : C), id_sieve X ∈ coverings X)
--TODO coverings is 'cofiltrant' [SGA 4 II 1.1.1.]
-- how to generate this? @[ext] didn't work for because of the explicit universe parameters
lemma grothendieck_topology_ext {J K : grothendieck_topology C}:
J.coverings = K.coverings → J = K := by {cases K, intro H, cases J, tidy}
-- SGA 4 II 1.1.2. topologies plus ou moins fine
instance grothendieck_topology_partial_order:
partial_order (grothendieck_topology C) :=
{ le := (λ J, λ K, J.coverings ≤ K.coverings),
le_refl := by {intros J X, exact le_refl (J.coverings X), },
le_trans := by {intros J K L hJK hKL X, exact le_trans (hJK X) (hKL X),},
le_antisymm := by {
intros J K hJK hKJ,
apply grothendieck_topology_ext, ext X S,
split,
intro hS,
exact hJK X hS,
intro hS,
exact hKJ X hS, }
}
-- SGA 4 II 1.1.3. intersection topology
instance grothendieck_topology_has_Inf:
lattice.has_Inf (grothendieck_topology C) :=
{ Inf := λ T : set (grothendieck_topology C), ⟨ λ U : C,
⋂ (J : grothendieck_topology C) (H : J ∈ T), J.coverings U,
by { tidy, apply H_w.base_change, exact a H_w H_w_1, },
by {
tidy,
apply H_w.local_character X S T_1,
exact _x H_w H_w_1,
intros Y f hf,
exact a Y f hf H_w H_w_1, },
by {tidy, exact H_w.id X, } ⟩ }
-- SGA 4 II 1.1.4. discrete (top) and chaotic (bot) topologies
instance grothendieck_topology_order_top:
lattice.order_top (grothendieck_topology C) :=
{ top := ⟨λ U, {a | true}, by tidy, by tidy, by tidy⟩,
le_top := by tidy,
..grothendieck_topology_partial_order C}
instance grothendieck_topology_order_bot:
lattice.order_bot (grothendieck_topology C) :=
{ bot := ⟨ λ U, {id_sieve U},
by {
tidy,
rw a,
rw pullback_id_sieve,
}, by {
tidy,
have H1 : (𝟙 X) ∈ S.map X,
rw h,
tidy,
have H := a X (𝟙 X) H1,
rw <- H,
apply sieve_ext, ext,
have H : x_1 = x_1 ≫ 𝟙 X := by tidy,
split, {
intro hx,
rw H at hx,
exact hx,
}, {
intro hx,
have : (x_1 ≫ 𝟙 X) ∈ T.map x := hx,
rw <- H at this,
exact this,
},
}, by tidy⟩,
bot_le := by {
intros J U S hS,
have H : S = id_sieve U := by tidy,
rw H,
exact J.id U,
},
..grothendieck_topology_partial_order C}
end topologies
section topologies
universes v u
--SGA 4 II 1.1.6. topology generated by family of morphisms
def topology_gen_by {C : Type u} [iC : category.{v} C] (fa : Π X Y : C, set (Y ⟶ X)):
@grothendieck_topology C iC := lattice.Inf {J | ∀ X Y : C, sieve_gen_by (fa X) ∈ J.coverings X}
def is_fibreproduct {C : Type u} [iC : category.{v} C]
{A X Y Z : C} (pX : A ⟶ X) (pY : A ⟶ Y) (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :=
∀ B : C, ∀ fx : B ⟶ X, ∀ fy : B ⟶ Y, fx ≫ f = fy ≫ g →
(∃ h : B ⟶ A, h ≫ pX = fx ∧ h ≫ pY = fy ∧
(∀ h1 : B ⟶ A, (h1 ≫ pX = fx ∧ h1 ≫ pY = fy) → h1 = h))
def is_squareable {C : Type u} [iC : category.{v} C] {X Y :C} (f : Y ⟶ X) :=
∀ Z : C, ∀ g : Z ⟶ X, ∃ A : C, ∃ pX : A ⟶ Z, ∃ pY : A ⟶ Y,
is_fibreproduct pX pY g f
--SGA 4 II def 1.3. pretopology
structure pretopology (C : Type u) [iC : category.{v} C] :=
(coverings : Π X : C, set (Π Y : C, set (Y ⟶ X)))
(squareable : ∀ X : C, ∀ fa : (Π Y : C, set (Y ⟶ X)),
fa ∈ coverings X → ∀ {Y : C} (f : Y ⟶ X), f ∈ fa Y → is_squareable f)
(basechange : ∀ X : C, ∀ fa : (Π Z : C, set (Z ⟶ X)), ∀ {Y : C} (f : Y ⟶ X),
fa ∈ coverings X → (λ Z : C, {g : Z ⟶ Y | ∃ Xa : C, ∃ h : Xa ⟶ X,
h ∈ fa Xa ∧ ∃ p : Z ⟶ Xa, is_fibreproduct p g h f}) ∈ coverings Y)
(local_character : sorry)
(identity : ∀ X : C, sorry)
--TODO prove Prop 1.4
end topologies
section sites
universes v u
variables (cat : Type u) [icat : category.{v} cat]
include icat
-- SGA 4 II 1.1.5
structure site :=
(top : @grothendieck_topology cat icat)
variable C : site cat
def covering_morphisms (X : cat) (fa : Π Y : cat, set (Y ⟶ X)) :=
sieve_gen_by fa ∈ C.top.coverings X
end sites
section sites
universe v
open topological_space
-- this is quite bad, especially base_change
-- I find it annoying to switch between set theory
-- and the category of open sets... there's some of ulift, plift magic
-- there should definitely be an easy way of doing this
-- (tidy doesn't work / produces something with I don't understand)
-- maybe it can be simplified by defining it as the topology generated by open covers.
def grothendieck_topology_of_topology (M : Top.{v}):
@grothendieck_topology (opens M) opens.opens_category :=
⟨λ X : opens M, {s | ∀ x : M, x ∈ X → ∃ Y : opens M, s.map Y ≠ ∅ ∧ x ∈ Y },
by {
intros X Y s f hs,
intros x hx,
have hx' : x ∈ X,
have H : Y ⊆ X := f.down.down,
exact H hx,
have h := hs x hx',
cases h with Z hZ,
refine ⟨Z ∩ Y, _, _⟩,
{ rw set.ne_empty_iff_nonempty,
rw set.ne_empty_iff_nonempty at hZ,
cases hZ.1 with i hi,
have h1 : Z ∩ Y ≤ Y,
{ intros w hw,
have h3 : (Z ∩ Y).val = Z.val ∩ Y.val := by tidy,
rw h3 at hw,
rw set.mem_inter_iff at hw,
exact hw.2, },
let g : Z ∩ Y ⟶ Y := ulift.up (plift.up h1),
have h2 : Z ∩ Y ≤ Z,
{ intros w hw,
have h3 : (Z ∩ Y).val = Z.val ∩ Y.val := by tidy,
rw h3 at hw,
rw set.mem_inter_iff at hw,
exact hw.1, },
let t : Z ∩ Y ⟶ Z := ulift.up (plift.up h2),
have H : t ≫ i ∈ s.map (Z ∩ Y),
apply s.comp, exact hi,
have H1 : t ≫ i = g ≫ f := by tidy,
rw H1 at H,
have H2 : g ∈ (pullback_sieve f s).map (Z ∩ Y) := H,
existsi g, exact H,
}, {
split,
exact hZ.2,
exact hx,
},
}, by {
intros X S T hS H x hx,
cases hS x hx with Y hY,
rw set.ne_empty_iff_nonempty at hY,
cases hY.1 with i hi,
cases H Y i hi x hY.2 with Z hZ,
rw set.ne_empty_iff_nonempty at hZ,
cases hZ.1 with j hj,
refine ⟨Z, _, hZ.2⟩,
rw set.ne_empty_iff_nonempty,
existsi j ≫ i,
exact hj,
},
by {
intros X x hx,
refine ⟨X, _, hx⟩,
intro h,
set s : sieve.{v} X := id_sieve X with sdef,
have h1 : 𝟙 X ∈ s.map X := by tidy,
rw h at h1,
rw set.mem_empty_eq at h1,
exact h1,
}⟩
end sites
open opposite
universes v u
variables {C : Type u} [𝒞 : category.{v} C]
include 𝒞
structure covering (U : C) :=
(ι : Type v)
(obj : ι → C)
(hom : Π i, obj i ⟶ U)
set_option pp.universes true
/- redefined this as category + grothendieck topology
structure site :=
(index : C → Type v)
(coverings : Π (U : C), index U → covering.{v} U)
(pullback : ∀ {U V: C} (k : index U) (g : V ⟶ U), ∃ (l : index V), ∀ (j : (coverings V l).ι),
∃ (i : (coverings U k).ι) (h : ((coverings V l).obj j) ⟶ ((coverings U k).obj i)),
(coverings V l).hom j ≫ g = h ≫ ((coverings U k).hom i))
-/
variables {D : Type u} [Dc : category.{v} D]
variables [products : limits.has_products.{v} D] [pullbacks : limits.has_pullbacks.{v} C]
variables {F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D}
include Dc products pullbacks
def asdf (U : C) (CU : covering.{v} U) (i j : CU.ι) := limits.pullback (CU.hom i) (CU.hom j)
/-def obj1 (U : C) (CU : covering U) := (limits.pullback (CU.hom i) (CU.hom j)) -/
def fan1 (U : C) (CU : covering.{v} U) := λ (k : CU.ι × CU.ι), F.obj (op ( limits.pullback (CU.hom k.1) (CU.hom k.2)))
def intersection_prod (U : C) (CU : covering.{v u} U) := limits.pi_obj.{v u} (@fan1 _ _ _ _ _ _ F U CU)
/- TODO:
Get maps from product of pullbacks to product of U_i
-/
end category_theory.limits
end category_theory |
493b5b4fd744a356bc0b1fb213dfc772a4043650 | d406927ab5617694ec9ea7001f101b7c9e3d9702 | /src/category_theory/limits/constructions/filtered.lean | 1836ccd9793c59fc1b518feee2ad8d99e346f826 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | alreadydone/mathlib | dc0be621c6c8208c581f5170a8216c5ba6721927 | c982179ec21091d3e102d8a5d9f5fe06c8fafb73 | refs/heads/master | 1,685,523,275,196 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 1,670,184,141,000 | 287,574,545 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,670,290,714,000 | 1,597,421,623,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,556 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel
-/
import category_theory.limits.constructions.limits_of_products_and_equalizers
import category_theory.limits.opposites
/-!
# Constructing colimits from finite colimits and filtered colimits
We construct colimits of size `w` from finite colimits and filtered colimits of size `w`. Since
`w`-sized colimits are constructured from coequalizers and `w`-sized coproducts, it suffices to
construct `w`-sized coproducts from finite coproducts and `w`-sized filtered colimits.
The idea is simple: to construct coproducts of shape `α`, we take the colimit of the filtered
diagram of all coproducts of finite subsets of `α`.
We also deduce the dual statement by invoking the original statement in `Cᵒᵖ`.
-/
universes w v u
noncomputable theory
open category_theory
variables {C : Type u} [category.{v} C] {α : Type w}
namespace category_theory.limits
namespace coproducts_from_finite_filtered
local attribute [tidy] tactic.case_bash
/-- If `C` has finite coproducts, a functor `discrete α ⥤ C` lifts to a functor
`finset (discrete α) ⥤ C` by taking coproducts. -/
@[simps]
def lift_to_finset [has_finite_coproducts C] (F : discrete α ⥤ C) : finset (discrete α) ⥤ C :=
{ obj := λ s, ∐ λ x : s, F.obj x,
map := λ s t h, sigma.desc (λ y, sigma.ι (λ x : t, F.obj x) ⟨y, h.down.down y.2⟩) }
/-- If `C` has finite coproducts and filtered colimits, we can construct arbitrary coproducts by
taking the colimit of the diagram formed by the coproducts of finite sets over the indexing
type. -/
@[simps]
def lift_to_finset_colimit_cocone [has_finite_coproducts C] [has_filtered_colimits_of_size.{w w} C]
[decidable_eq α] (F : discrete α ⥤ C) : colimit_cocone F :=
{ cocone :=
{ X := colimit (lift_to_finset F),
ι := discrete.nat_trans $ λ j,
@sigma.ι _ _ _ (λ x : ({j} : finset (discrete α)), F.obj x) _ ⟨j, by simp⟩ ≫
colimit.ι (lift_to_finset F) {j} },
is_colimit :=
{ desc := λ s, colimit.desc (lift_to_finset F)
{ X := s.X,
ι := { app := λ t, sigma.desc (λ x, s.ι.app x) } },
uniq' := λ s m h,
begin
ext t ⟨⟨j, hj⟩⟩,
convert h j using 1,
{ simp [← colimit.w (lift_to_finset F) ⟨⟨finset.singleton_subset_iff.2 hj⟩⟩], refl },
{ tidy }
end } }
end coproducts_from_finite_filtered
open coproducts_from_finite_filtered
lemma has_coproducts_of_finite_and_filtered [has_finite_coproducts C]
[has_filtered_colimits_of_size.{w w} C] : has_coproducts.{w} C :=
λ α, by { classical, exactI ⟨λ F, has_colimit.mk (lift_to_finset_colimit_cocone F)⟩ }
lemma has_colimits_of_finite_and_filtered [has_finite_colimits C]
[has_filtered_colimits_of_size.{w w} C] : has_colimits_of_size.{w w} C :=
have has_coproducts.{w} C, from has_coproducts_of_finite_and_filtered,
by exactI has_colimits_of_has_coequalizers_and_coproducts
lemma has_products_of_finite_and_cofiltered [has_finite_products C]
[has_cofiltered_limits_of_size.{w w} C] : has_products.{w} C :=
have has_coproducts.{w} Cᵒᵖ, from has_coproducts_of_finite_and_filtered,
by exactI has_products_of_opposite
lemma has_limits_of_finite_and_cofiltered [has_finite_limits C]
[has_cofiltered_limits_of_size.{w w} C] : has_limits_of_size.{w w} C :=
have has_products.{w} C, from has_products_of_finite_and_cofiltered,
by exactI has_limits_of_has_equalizers_and_products
end category_theory.limits
|
52709f5c2840538b6cb2f95a90e91a23c4b283cd | 7cef822f3b952965621309e88eadf618da0c8ae9 | /src/data/complex/exponential.lean | 0bb684b1894fca49965797e4e91984bf0a943111 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | rmitta/mathlib | 8d90aee30b4db2b013e01f62c33f297d7e64a43d | 883d974b608845bad30ae19e27e33c285200bf84 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,776,832,544 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 1,576,874,096,000 | 153,663,165 | 0 | 2 | Apache-2.0 | 1,544,806,490,000 | 1,539,884,365,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 46,572 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir
-/
import algebra.archimedean algebra.geom_sum
import data.nat.choose data.complex.basic
import tactic.linarith
local notation `abs'` := _root_.abs
open is_absolute_value
open_locale classical
section
open real is_absolute_value finset
lemma forall_ge_le_of_forall_le_succ {α : Type*} [preorder α] (f : ℕ → α) {m : ℕ}
(h : ∀ n ≥ m, f n.succ ≤ f n) : ∀ {l}, ∀ k ≥ m, k ≤ l → f l ≤ f k :=
begin
assume l k hkm hkl,
generalize hp : l - k = p,
have : l = k + p := add_comm p k ▸ (nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add hkl).1 hp,
subst this,
clear hkl hp,
induction p with p ih,
{ simp },
{ exact le_trans (h _ (le_trans hkm (nat.le_add_right _ _))) ih }
end
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} [ring β]
[discrete_linear_ordered_field α] [archimedean α] {abv : β → α} [is_absolute_value abv]
lemma is_cau_of_decreasing_bounded (f : ℕ → α) {a : α} {m : ℕ} (ham : ∀ n ≥ m, abs (f n) ≤ a)
(hnm : ∀ n ≥ m, f n.succ ≤ f n) : is_cau_seq abs f :=
λ ε ε0,
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := archimedean.arch a ε0 in
have h : ∃ l, ∀ n ≥ m, a - add_monoid.smul l ε < f n :=
⟨k + k + 1, λ n hnm, lt_of_lt_of_le
(show a - add_monoid.smul (k + (k + 1)) ε < -abs (f n),
from lt_neg.1 $ lt_of_le_of_lt (ham n hnm) (begin
rw [neg_sub, lt_sub_iff_add_lt, add_monoid.add_smul],
exact add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hk (lt_of_le_of_lt hk
(lt_add_of_pos_left _ ε0)),
end))
(neg_le.2 $ (abs_neg (f n)) ▸ le_abs_self _)⟩,
let l := nat.find h in
have hl : ∀ (n : ℕ), n ≥ m → f n > a - add_monoid.smul l ε := nat.find_spec h,
have hl0 : l ≠ 0 := λ hl0, not_lt_of_ge (ham m (le_refl _))
(lt_of_lt_of_le (by have := hl m (le_refl m); simpa [hl0] using this) (le_abs_self (f m))),
begin
cases classical.not_forall.1
(nat.find_min h (nat.pred_lt hl0)) with i hi,
rw [not_imp, not_lt] at hi,
existsi i,
assume j hj,
have hfij : f j ≤ f i := forall_ge_le_of_forall_le_succ f hnm _ hi.1 hj,
rw [abs_of_nonpos (sub_nonpos.2 hfij), neg_sub, sub_lt_iff_lt_add'],
exact calc f i ≤ a - add_monoid.smul (nat.pred l) ε : hi.2
... = a - add_monoid.smul l ε + ε :
by conv {to_rhs, rw [← nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (nat.pos_of_ne_zero hl0), succ_smul',
sub_add, add_sub_cancel] }
... < f j + ε : add_lt_add_right (hl j (le_trans hi.1 hj)) _
end
lemma is_cau_of_mono_bounded (f : ℕ → α) {a : α} {m : ℕ} (ham : ∀ n ≥ m, abs (f n) ≤ a)
(hnm : ∀ n ≥ m, f n ≤ f n.succ) : is_cau_seq abs f :=
begin
refine @eq.rec_on (ℕ → α) _ (is_cau_seq abs) _ _
(-⟨_, @is_cau_of_decreasing_bounded _ _ _ (λ n, -f n) a m (by simpa) (by simpa)⟩ : cau_seq α abs).2,
ext,
exact neg_neg _
end
lemma is_cau_series_of_abv_le_cau {f : ℕ → β} {g : ℕ → α} (n : ℕ) : (∀ m, n ≤ m → abv (f m) ≤ g m) →
is_cau_seq abs (λ n, (range n).sum g) → is_cau_seq abv (λ n, (range n).sum f) :=
begin
assume hm hg ε ε0,
cases hg (ε / 2) (div_pos ε0 (by norm_num)) with i hi,
existsi max n i,
assume j ji,
have hi₁ := hi j (le_trans (le_max_right n i) ji),
have hi₂ := hi (max n i) (le_max_right n i),
have sub_le := abs_sub_le ((range j).sum g) ((range i).sum g) ((range (max n i)).sum g),
have := add_lt_add hi₁ hi₂,
rw [abs_sub ((range (max n i)).sum g), add_halves ε] at this,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans (le_trans _ (le_abs_self _)) sub_le) this,
generalize hk : j - max n i = k,
clear this hi₂ hi₁ hi ε0 ε hg sub_le,
rw nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add ji at hk,
rw hk,
clear hk ji j,
induction k with k' hi,
{ simp [abv_zero abv] },
{ dsimp at *,
rw [nat.succ_add, sum_range_succ, sum_range_succ, add_assoc, add_assoc],
refine le_trans (abv_add _ _ _) _,
exact add_le_add (hm _ (le_add_of_nonneg_of_le (nat.zero_le _) (le_max_left _ _))) hi },
end
lemma is_cau_series_of_abv_cau {f : ℕ → β} : is_cau_seq abs (λ m, (range m).sum (λ n, abv (f n))) →
is_cau_seq abv (λ m, (range m).sum f) :=
is_cau_series_of_abv_le_cau 0 (λ n h, le_refl _)
lemma is_cau_geo_series {β : Type*} [field β] {abv : β → α} [is_absolute_value abv]
(x : β) (hx1 : abv x < 1) : is_cau_seq abv (λ n, (range n).sum (λ m, x ^ m)) :=
have hx1' : abv x ≠ 1 := λ h, by simpa [h, lt_irrefl] using hx1,
is_cau_series_of_abv_cau
begin
simp only [abv_pow abv] {eta := ff},
have : (λ (m : ℕ), (range m).sum (λ n, (abv x) ^ n)) =
λ m, geom_series (abv x) m := rfl,
simp only [this, geom_sum hx1'] {eta := ff},
conv in (_ / _) { rw [← neg_div_neg_eq, neg_sub, neg_sub] },
refine @is_cau_of_mono_bounded _ _ _ _ ((1 : α) / (1 - abv x)) 0 _ _,
{ assume n hn,
rw abs_of_nonneg,
refine div_le_div_of_le_of_pos (sub_le_self _ (abv_pow abv x n ▸ abv_nonneg _ _))
(sub_pos.2 hx1),
refine div_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 _) (sub_pos.2 hx1),
clear hn,
induction n with n ih,
{ simp },
{ rw [_root_.pow_succ, ← one_mul (1 : α)],
refine mul_le_mul (le_of_lt hx1) ih (abv_pow abv x n ▸ abv_nonneg _ _) (by norm_num) } },
{ assume n hn,
refine div_le_div_of_le_of_pos (sub_le_sub_left _ _) (sub_pos.2 hx1),
rw [← one_mul (_ ^ n), _root_.pow_succ],
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_of_lt hx1) (pow_nonneg (abv_nonneg _ _) _) }
end
lemma is_cau_geo_series_const (a : α) {x : α} (hx1 : abs x < 1) : is_cau_seq abs (λ m, (range m).sum (λ n, a * x ^ n)) :=
have is_cau_seq abs (λ m, a * (range m).sum (λ n, x ^ n)) := (cau_seq.const abs a * ⟨_, is_cau_geo_series x hx1⟩).2,
by simpa only [mul_sum]
lemma series_ratio_test {f : ℕ → β} (n : ℕ) (r : α)
(hr0 : 0 ≤ r) (hr1 : r < 1) (h : ∀ m, n ≤ m → abv (f m.succ) ≤ r * abv (f m)) :
is_cau_seq abv (λ m, (range m).sum f) :=
have har1 : abs r < 1, by rwa abs_of_nonneg hr0,
begin
refine is_cau_series_of_abv_le_cau n.succ _ (is_cau_geo_series_const (abv (f n.succ) * r⁻¹ ^ n.succ) har1),
assume m hmn,
cases classical.em (r = 0) with r_zero r_ne_zero,
{ have m_pos := lt_of_lt_of_le (nat.succ_pos n) hmn,
have := h m.pred (nat.le_of_succ_le_succ (by rwa [nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos m_pos])),
simpa [r_zero, nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos m_pos, pow_succ] },
generalize hk : m - n.succ = k,
have r_pos : 0 < r := lt_of_le_of_ne hr0 (ne.symm r_ne_zero),
replace hk : m = k + n.succ := (nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add hmn).1 hk,
induction k with k ih generalizing m n,
{ rw [hk, zero_add, mul_right_comm, ← pow_inv _ _ r_ne_zero, ← div_eq_mul_inv, mul_div_cancel],
exact (ne_of_lt (pow_pos r_pos _)).symm },
{ have kn : k + n.succ ≥ n.succ, by rw ← zero_add n.succ; exact add_le_add (zero_le _) (by simp),
rw [hk, nat.succ_add, pow_succ' r, ← mul_assoc],
exact le_trans (by rw mul_comm; exact h _ (nat.le_of_succ_le kn))
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (ih (k + n.succ) n h kn rfl) hr0) }
end
lemma sum_range_diag_flip {α : Type*} [add_comm_monoid α] (n : ℕ) (f : ℕ → ℕ → α) :
(range n).sum (λ m, (range (m + 1)).sum (λ k, f k (m - k))) =
(range n).sum (λ m, (range (n - m)).sum (f m)) :=
have h₁ : ((range n).sigma (range ∘ nat.succ)).sum
(λ (a : Σ m, ℕ), f (a.2) (a.1 - a.2)) =
(range n).sum (λ m, (range (m + 1)).sum
(λ k, f k (m - k))) := sum_sigma,
have h₂ : ((range n).sigma (λ m, range (n - m))).sum (λ a : Σ (m : ℕ), ℕ, f (a.1) (a.2)) =
(range n).sum (λ m, sum (range (n - m)) (f m)) := sum_sigma,
h₁ ▸ h₂ ▸ sum_bij
(λ a _, ⟨a.2, a.1 - a.2⟩)
(λ a ha, have h₁ : a.1 < n := mem_range.1 (mem_sigma.1 ha).1,
have h₂ : a.2 < nat.succ a.1 := mem_range.1 (mem_sigma.1 ha).2,
mem_sigma.2 ⟨mem_range.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le h₂ h₁),
mem_range.2 ((nat.sub_lt_sub_right_iff (nat.le_of_lt_succ h₂)).2 h₁)⟩)
(λ _ _, rfl)
(λ ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁, b₂⟩ ha hb h,
have ha : a₁ < n ∧ a₂ ≤ a₁ :=
⟨mem_range.1 (mem_sigma.1 ha).1, nat.le_of_lt_succ (mem_range.1 (mem_sigma.1 ha).2)⟩,
have hb : b₁ < n ∧ b₂ ≤ b₁ :=
⟨mem_range.1 (mem_sigma.1 hb).1, nat.le_of_lt_succ (mem_range.1 (mem_sigma.1 hb).2)⟩,
have h : a₂ = b₂ ∧ _ := sigma.mk.inj h,
have h' : a₁ = b₁ - b₂ + a₂ := (nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add ha.2).1 (eq_of_heq h.2),
sigma.mk.inj_iff.2
⟨nat.sub_add_cancel hb.2 ▸ h'.symm ▸ h.1 ▸ rfl,
(heq_of_eq h.1)⟩)
(λ ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ha,
have ha : a₁ < n ∧ a₂ < n - a₁ :=
⟨mem_range.1 (mem_sigma.1 ha).1, (mem_range.1 (mem_sigma.1 ha).2)⟩,
⟨⟨a₂ + a₁, a₁⟩, ⟨mem_sigma.2 ⟨mem_range.2 (nat.lt_sub_right_iff_add_lt.1 ha.2),
mem_range.2 (nat.lt_succ_of_le (nat.le_add_left _ _))⟩,
sigma.mk.inj_iff.2 ⟨rfl, heq_of_eq (nat.add_sub_cancel _ _).symm⟩⟩⟩)
lemma abv_sum_le_sum_abv {γ : Type*} (f : γ → β) (s : finset γ) :
abv (s.sum f) ≤ s.sum (abv ∘ f) :=
by haveI := classical.dec_eq γ; exact
finset.induction_on s (by simp [abv_zero abv])
(λ a s has ih, by rw [sum_insert has, sum_insert has];
exact le_trans (abv_add abv _ _) (add_le_add_left ih _))
lemma sum_range_sub_sum_range {α : Type*} [add_comm_group α] {f : ℕ → α}
{n m : ℕ} (hnm : n ≤ m) : (range m).sum f - (range n).sum f =
((range m).filter (λ k, n ≤ k)).sum f :=
begin
rw [← sum_sdiff (@filter_subset _ (λ k, n ≤ k) _ (range m)),
sub_eq_iff_eq_add, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, add_sub_cancel'],
refine finset.sum_congr
(finset.ext.2 $ λ a, ⟨λ h, by simp at *; finish,
λ h, have ham : a < m := lt_of_lt_of_le (mem_range.1 h) hnm,
by simp * at *⟩)
(λ _ _, rfl),
end
lemma cauchy_product {a b : ℕ → β}
(ha : is_cau_seq abs (λ m, (range m).sum (λ n, abv (a n))))
(hb : is_cau_seq abv (λ m, (range m).sum b)) (ε : α) (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ i : ℕ, ∀ j ≥ i, abv ((range j).sum a * (range j).sum b -
(range j).sum (λ n, (range (n + 1)).sum (λ m, a m * b (n - m)))) < ε :=
let ⟨Q, hQ⟩ := cau_seq.bounded ⟨_, hb⟩ in
let ⟨P, hP⟩ := cau_seq.bounded ⟨_, ha⟩ in
have hP0 : 0 < P, from lt_of_le_of_lt (abs_nonneg _) (hP 0),
have hPε0 : 0 < ε / (2 * P),
from div_pos ε0 (mul_pos (show (2 : α) > 0, from by norm_num) hP0),
let ⟨N, hN⟩ := cau_seq.cauchy₂ ⟨_, hb⟩ hPε0 in
have hQε0 : 0 < ε / (4 * Q),
from div_pos ε0 (mul_pos (show (0 : α) < 4, by norm_num) (lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_nonneg _ _) (hQ 0))),
let ⟨M, hM⟩ := cau_seq.cauchy₂ ⟨_, ha⟩ hQε0 in
⟨2 * (max N M + 1), λ K hK,
have h₁ : sum (range K) (λ m, (range (m + 1)).sum (λ k, a k * b (m - k))) =
sum (range K) (λ m, sum (range (K - m)) (λ n, a m * b n)),
by simpa using sum_range_diag_flip K (λ m n, a m * b n),
have h₂ : (λ i, (range (K - i)).sum (λ k, a i * b k)) = (λ i, a i * (range (K - i)).sum b),
by simp [finset.mul_sum],
have h₃ : (range K).sum (λ i, a i * (range (K - i)).sum b) =
(range K).sum (λ i, a i * ((range (K - i)).sum b - (range K).sum b))
+ (range K).sum (λ i, a i * (range K).sum b),
by rw ← sum_add_distrib; simp [(mul_add _ _ _).symm],
have two_mul_two : (4 : α) = 2 * 2, by norm_num,
have hQ0 : Q ≠ 0, from λ h, by simpa [h, lt_irrefl] using hQε0,
have h2Q0 : 2 * Q ≠ 0, from mul_ne_zero two_ne_zero hQ0,
have hε : ε / (2 * P) * P + ε / (4 * Q) * (2 * Q) = ε,
by rw [← div_div_eq_div_mul, div_mul_cancel _ (ne.symm (ne_of_lt hP0)),
two_mul_two, mul_assoc, ← div_div_eq_div_mul, div_mul_cancel _ h2Q0, add_halves],
have hNMK : max N M + 1 < K,
from lt_of_lt_of_le (by rw two_mul; exact lt_add_of_pos_left _ (nat.succ_pos _)) hK,
have hKN : N < K,
from calc N ≤ max N M : le_max_left _ _
... < max N M + 1 : nat.lt_succ_self _
... < K : hNMK,
have hsumlesum : (range (max N M + 1)).sum (λ i, abv (a i) *
abv ((range (K - i)).sum b - (range K).sum b)) ≤ (range (max N M + 1)).sum
(λ i, abv (a i) * (ε / (2 * P))),
from sum_le_sum (λ m hmJ, mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left
(le_of_lt (hN (K - m) K
(nat.le_sub_left_of_add_le (le_trans
(by rw two_mul; exact add_le_add (le_of_lt (mem_range.1 hmJ))
(le_trans (le_max_left _ _) (le_of_lt (lt_add_one _)))) hK))
(le_of_lt hKN))) (abv_nonneg abv _)),
have hsumltP : sum (range (max N M + 1)) (λ n, abv (a n)) < P :=
calc sum (range (max N M + 1)) (λ n, abv (a n))
= abs (sum (range (max N M + 1)) (λ n, abv (a n))) :
eq.symm (abs_of_nonneg (sum_nonneg (λ x h, abv_nonneg abv (a x))))
... < P : hP (max N M + 1),
begin
rw [h₁, h₂, h₃, sum_mul, ← sub_sub, sub_right_comm, sub_self, zero_sub, abv_neg abv],
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_sum_le_sum_abv _ _) _,
suffices : (range (max N M + 1)).sum (λ (i : ℕ), abv (a i) * abv ((range (K - i)).sum b - (range K).sum b)) +
((range K).sum (λ (i : ℕ), abv (a i) * abv ((range (K - i)).sum b - (range K).sum b)) -(range (max N M + 1)).sum
(λ (i : ℕ), abv (a i) * abv ((range (K - i)).sum b - (range K).sum b))) < ε / (2 * P) * P + ε / (4 * Q) * (2 * Q),
{ rw hε at this, simpa [abv_mul abv] },
refine add_lt_add (lt_of_le_of_lt hsumlesum
(by rw [← sum_mul, mul_comm]; exact (mul_lt_mul_left hPε0).mpr hsumltP)) _,
rw sum_range_sub_sum_range (le_of_lt hNMK),
exact calc sum ((range K).filter (λ k, max N M + 1 ≤ k))
(λ i, abv (a i) * abv (sum (range (K - i)) b - sum (range K) b))
≤ sum ((range K).filter (λ k, max N M + 1 ≤ k)) (λ i, abv (a i) * (2 * Q)) :
sum_le_sum (λ n hn, begin
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ (abv_nonneg _ _),
rw sub_eq_add_neg,
refine le_trans (abv_add _ _ _) _,
rw [two_mul, abv_neg abv],
exact add_le_add (le_of_lt (hQ _)) (le_of_lt (hQ _)),
end)
... < ε / (4 * Q) * (2 * Q) :
by rw [← sum_mul, ← sum_range_sub_sum_range (le_of_lt hNMK)];
refine (mul_lt_mul_right $ by rw two_mul;
exact add_pos (lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_nonneg _ _) (hQ 0))
(lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_nonneg _ _) (hQ 0))).2
(lt_of_le_of_lt (le_abs_self _)
(hM _ _ (le_trans (nat.le_succ_of_le (le_max_right _ _)) (le_of_lt hNMK))
(nat.le_succ_of_le (le_max_right _ _))))
end⟩
end
open finset
open cau_seq
namespace complex
lemma is_cau_abs_exp (z : ℂ) : is_cau_seq _root_.abs
(λ n, (range n).sum (λ m, abs (z ^ m / nat.fact m))) :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_gt (abs z) in
have hn0 : (0 : ℝ) < n, from lt_of_le_of_lt (abs_nonneg _) hn,
series_ratio_test n (complex.abs z / n) (div_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_pos (complex.abs_nonneg _) hn0)
(by rwa [div_lt_iff hn0, one_mul])
(λ m hm,
by rw [abs_abs, abs_abs, nat.fact_succ, pow_succ,
mul_comm m.succ, nat.cast_mul, ← div_div_eq_div_mul, mul_div_assoc,
mul_div_right_comm, abs_mul, abs_div, abs_cast_nat];
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right
(div_le_div_of_le_left (abs_nonneg _) hn0
(nat.cast_le.2 (le_trans hm (nat.le_succ _)))) (abs_nonneg _))
noncomputable theory
lemma is_cau_exp (z : ℂ) : is_cau_seq abs (λ n, (range n).sum (λ m, z ^ m / nat.fact m)) :=
is_cau_series_of_abv_cau (is_cau_abs_exp z)
def exp' (z : ℂ) : cau_seq ℂ complex.abs := ⟨λ n, (range n).sum (λ m, z ^ m / nat.fact m), is_cau_exp z⟩
def exp (z : ℂ) : ℂ := lim (exp' z)
def sin (z : ℂ) : ℂ := ((exp (-z * I) - exp (z * I)) * I) / 2
def cos (z : ℂ) : ℂ := (exp (z * I) + exp (-z * I)) / 2
def tan (z : ℂ) : ℂ := sin z / cos z
def sinh (z : ℂ) : ℂ := (exp z - exp (-z)) / 2
def cosh (z : ℂ) : ℂ := (exp z + exp (-z)) / 2
def tanh (z : ℂ) : ℂ := sinh z / cosh z
end complex
namespace real
open complex
def exp (x : ℝ) : ℝ := (exp x).re
def sin (x : ℝ) : ℝ := (sin x).re
def cos (x : ℝ) : ℝ := (cos x).re
def tan (x : ℝ) : ℝ := (tan x).re
def sinh (x : ℝ) : ℝ := (sinh x).re
def cosh (x : ℝ) : ℝ := (cosh x).re
def tanh (x : ℝ) : ℝ := (tanh x).re
end real
namespace complex
variables (x y : ℂ)
@[simp] lemma exp_zero : exp 0 = 1 :=
lim_eq_of_equiv_const $
λ ε ε0, ⟨1, λ j hj, begin
convert ε0,
cases j,
{ exact absurd hj (not_le_of_gt zero_lt_one) },
{ dsimp [exp'],
induction j with j ih,
{ dsimp [exp']; simp },
{ rw ← ih dec_trivial,
simp only [sum_range_succ, pow_succ],
simp } }
end⟩
lemma exp_add : exp (x + y) = exp x * exp y :=
show lim (⟨_, is_cau_exp (x + y)⟩ : cau_seq ℂ abs) =
lim (show cau_seq ℂ abs, from ⟨_, is_cau_exp x⟩)
* lim (show cau_seq ℂ abs, from ⟨_, is_cau_exp y⟩),
from
have hj : ∀ j : ℕ, (range j).sum
(λ m, (x + y) ^ m / m.fact) = (range j).sum
(λ i, (range (i + 1)).sum (λ k, x ^ k / k.fact *
(y ^ (i - k) / (i - k).fact))),
from assume j,
finset.sum_congr rfl (λ m hm, begin
rw [add_pow, div_eq_mul_inv, sum_mul],
refine finset.sum_congr rfl (λ i hi, _),
have h₁ : (nat.choose m i : ℂ) ≠ 0 := nat.cast_ne_zero.2
(nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 (nat.choose_pos (nat.le_of_lt_succ (mem_range.1 hi)))),
have h₂ := nat.choose_mul_fact_mul_fact (nat.le_of_lt_succ $ finset.mem_range.1 hi),
rw [← h₂, nat.cast_mul, nat.cast_mul, mul_inv', mul_inv'],
simp only [mul_left_comm (nat.choose m i : ℂ), mul_assoc, mul_left_comm (nat.choose m i : ℂ)⁻¹,
mul_comm (nat.choose m i : ℂ)],
rw inv_mul_cancel h₁,
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
end),
by rw lim_mul_lim;
exact eq.symm (lim_eq_lim_of_equiv (by dsimp; simp only [hj];
exact cauchy_product (is_cau_abs_exp x) (is_cau_exp y)))
attribute [irreducible] complex.exp
lemma exp_nat_mul (x : ℂ) : ∀ n : ℕ, exp(n*x) = (exp x)^n
| 0 := by rw [nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, exp_zero, pow_zero]
| (nat.succ n) := by rw [pow_succ', nat.cast_add_one, add_mul, exp_add, ←exp_nat_mul, one_mul]
lemma exp_ne_zero : exp x ≠ 0 :=
λ h, @zero_ne_one ℂ _ $
by rw [← exp_zero, ← add_neg_self x, exp_add, h]; simp
lemma exp_neg : exp (-x) = (exp x)⁻¹ :=
by rw [← domain.mul_left_inj (exp_ne_zero x), ← exp_add];
simp [mul_inv_cancel (exp_ne_zero x)]
lemma exp_sub : exp (x - y) = exp x / exp y :=
by simp [exp_add, exp_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[simp] lemma exp_conj : exp (conj x) = conj (exp x) :=
begin
dsimp [exp],
rw [← lim_conj],
refine congr_arg lim (cau_seq.ext (λ _, _)),
dsimp [exp', function.comp, cau_seq_conj],
rw ← sum_hom conj,
refine sum_congr rfl (λ n hn, _),
rw [conj_div, conj_pow, ← of_real_nat_cast, conj_of_real]
end
@[simp] lemma of_real_exp_of_real_re (x : ℝ) : ((exp x).re : ℂ) = exp x :=
eq_conj_iff_re.1 $ by rw [← exp_conj, conj_of_real]
@[simp] lemma of_real_exp (x : ℝ) : (real.exp x : ℂ) = exp x :=
of_real_exp_of_real_re _
@[simp] lemma exp_of_real_im (x : ℝ) : (exp x).im = 0 :=
by rw [← of_real_exp_of_real_re, of_real_im]
lemma exp_of_real_re (x : ℝ) : (exp x).re = real.exp x := rfl
lemma two_sinh : 2 * sinh x = exp x - exp (-x) :=
mul_div_cancel' _ two_ne_zero'
lemma two_cosh : 2 * cosh x = exp x + exp (-x) :=
mul_div_cancel' _ two_ne_zero'
@[simp] lemma sinh_zero : sinh 0 = 0 := by simp [sinh]
@[simp] lemma sinh_neg : sinh (-x) = -sinh x :=
by simp [sinh, exp_neg, (neg_div _ _).symm, add_mul]
private lemma sinh_add_aux {a b c d : ℂ} :
(a - b) * (c + d) + (a + b) * (c - d) = 2 * (a * c - b * d) := by ring
lemma sinh_add : sinh (x + y) = sinh x * cosh y + cosh x * sinh y :=
begin
rw [← domain.mul_left_inj (@two_ne_zero' ℂ _ _ _), two_sinh,
exp_add, neg_add, exp_add, eq_comm,
mul_add, ← mul_assoc, two_sinh, mul_left_comm, two_sinh,
← domain.mul_left_inj (@two_ne_zero' ℂ _ _ _), mul_add,
mul_left_comm, two_cosh, ← mul_assoc, two_cosh],
exact sinh_add_aux
end
@[simp] lemma cosh_zero : cosh 0 = 1 := by simp [cosh]
@[simp] lemma cosh_neg : cosh (-x) = cosh x :=
by simp [cosh, exp_neg]
private lemma cosh_add_aux {a b c d : ℂ} :
(a + b) * (c + d) + (a - b) * (c - d) = 2 * (a * c + b * d) := by ring
lemma cosh_add : cosh (x + y) = cosh x * cosh y + sinh x * sinh y :=
begin
rw [← domain.mul_left_inj (@two_ne_zero' ℂ _ _ _), two_cosh,
exp_add, neg_add, exp_add, eq_comm,
mul_add, ← mul_assoc, two_cosh, ← mul_assoc, two_sinh,
← domain.mul_left_inj (@two_ne_zero' ℂ _ _ _), mul_add,
mul_left_comm, two_cosh, mul_left_comm, two_sinh],
exact cosh_add_aux
end
lemma sinh_sub : sinh (x - y) = sinh x * cosh y - cosh x * sinh y :=
by simp [sinh_add, sinh_neg, cosh_neg]
lemma cosh_sub : cosh (x - y) = cosh x * cosh y - sinh x * sinh y :=
by simp [cosh_add, sinh_neg, cosh_neg]
lemma sinh_conj : sinh (conj x) = conj (sinh x) :=
by rw [sinh, ← conj_neg, exp_conj, exp_conj, ← conj_sub, sinh, conj_div, conj_two]
@[simp] lemma of_real_sinh_of_real_re (x : ℝ) : ((sinh x).re : ℂ) = sinh x :=
eq_conj_iff_re.1 $ by rw [← sinh_conj, conj_of_real]
@[simp] lemma of_real_sinh (x : ℝ) : (real.sinh x : ℂ) = sinh x :=
of_real_sinh_of_real_re _
@[simp] lemma sinh_of_real_im (x : ℝ) : (sinh x).im = 0 :=
by rw [← of_real_sinh_of_real_re, of_real_im]
lemma sinh_of_real_re (x : ℝ) : (sinh x).re = real.sinh x := rfl
lemma cosh_conj : cosh (conj x) = conj (cosh x) :=
by rw [cosh, ← conj_neg, exp_conj, exp_conj, ← conj_add, cosh, conj_div, conj_two]
@[simp] lemma of_real_cosh_of_real_re (x : ℝ) : ((cosh x).re : ℂ) = cosh x :=
eq_conj_iff_re.1 $ by rw [← cosh_conj, conj_of_real]
@[simp] lemma of_real_cosh (x : ℝ) : (real.cosh x : ℂ) = cosh x :=
of_real_cosh_of_real_re _
@[simp] lemma cosh_of_real_im (x : ℝ) : (cosh x).im = 0 :=
by rw [← of_real_cosh_of_real_re, of_real_im]
lemma cosh_of_real_re (x : ℝ) : (cosh x).re = real.cosh x := rfl
lemma tanh_eq_sinh_div_cosh : tanh x = sinh x / cosh x := rfl
@[simp] lemma tanh_zero : tanh 0 = 0 := by simp [tanh]
@[simp] lemma tanh_neg : tanh (-x) = -tanh x := by simp [tanh, neg_div]
lemma tanh_conj : tanh (conj x) = conj (tanh x) :=
by rw [tanh, sinh_conj, cosh_conj, ← conj_div, tanh]
@[simp] lemma of_real_tanh_of_real_re (x : ℝ) : ((tanh x).re : ℂ) = tanh x :=
eq_conj_iff_re.1 $ by rw [← tanh_conj, conj_of_real]
@[simp] lemma of_real_tanh (x : ℝ) : (real.tanh x : ℂ) = tanh x :=
of_real_tanh_of_real_re _
@[simp] lemma tanh_of_real_im (x : ℝ) : (tanh x).im = 0 :=
by rw [← of_real_tanh_of_real_re, of_real_im]
lemma tanh_of_real_re (x : ℝ) : (tanh x).re = real.tanh x := rfl
lemma cosh_add_sinh : cosh x + sinh x = exp x :=
by rw [← domain.mul_left_inj (@two_ne_zero' ℂ _ _ _), mul_add,
two_cosh, two_sinh, add_add_sub_cancel, two_mul]
lemma sinh_add_cosh : sinh x + cosh x = exp x :=
by rw [add_comm, cosh_add_sinh]
lemma cosh_sub_sinh : cosh x - sinh x = exp (-x) :=
by rw [← domain.mul_left_inj (@two_ne_zero' ℂ _ _ _), mul_sub,
two_cosh, two_sinh, add_sub_sub_cancel, two_mul]
lemma cosh_sq_sub_sinh_sq : cosh x ^ 2 - sinh x ^ 2 = 1 :=
by rw [sq_sub_sq, cosh_add_sinh, cosh_sub_sinh, ← exp_add, add_neg_self, exp_zero]
@[simp] lemma sin_zero : sin 0 = 0 := by simp [sin]
@[simp] lemma sin_neg : sin (-x) = -sin x :=
by simp [sin, exp_neg, (neg_div _ _).symm, add_mul]
lemma two_sin : 2 * sin x = (exp (-x * I) - exp (x * I)) * I :=
mul_div_cancel' _ two_ne_zero'
lemma two_cos : 2 * cos x = exp (x * I) + exp (-x * I) :=
mul_div_cancel' _ two_ne_zero'
lemma sinh_mul_I : sinh (x * I) = sin x * I :=
by rw [← domain.mul_left_inj (@two_ne_zero' ℂ _ _ _), two_sinh,
← mul_assoc, two_sin, mul_assoc, I_mul_I, mul_neg_one,
neg_sub, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
lemma cosh_mul_I : cosh (x * I) = cos x :=
by rw [← domain.mul_left_inj (@two_ne_zero' ℂ _ _ _), two_cosh,
two_cos, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
lemma sin_add : sin (x + y) = sin x * cos y + cos x * sin y :=
by rw [← domain.mul_right_inj I_ne_zero, ← sinh_mul_I,
add_mul, add_mul, mul_right_comm, ← sinh_mul_I,
mul_assoc, ← sinh_mul_I, ← cosh_mul_I, ← cosh_mul_I, sinh_add]
@[simp] lemma cos_zero : cos 0 = 1 := by simp [cos]
@[simp] lemma cos_neg : cos (-x) = cos x :=
by simp [cos, exp_neg]
private lemma cos_add_aux {a b c d : ℂ} :
(a + b) * (c + d) - (b - a) * (d - c) * (-1) =
2 * (a * c + b * d) := by ring
lemma cos_add : cos (x + y) = cos x * cos y - sin x * sin y :=
by rw [← cosh_mul_I, add_mul, cosh_add, cosh_mul_I, cosh_mul_I,
sinh_mul_I, sinh_mul_I, mul_mul_mul_comm, I_mul_I,
mul_neg_one, sub_eq_add_neg]
lemma sin_sub : sin (x - y) = sin x * cos y - cos x * sin y :=
by simp [sin_add, sin_neg, cos_neg]
lemma cos_sub : cos (x - y) = cos x * cos y + sin x * sin y :=
by simp [cos_add, sin_neg, cos_neg]
lemma sin_conj : sin (conj x) = conj (sin x) :=
by rw [← domain.mul_right_inj I_ne_zero, ← sinh_mul_I,
← conj_neg_I, ← conj_mul, ← conj_mul, sinh_conj,
mul_neg_eq_neg_mul_symm, sinh_neg, sinh_mul_I, mul_neg_eq_neg_mul_symm]
@[simp] lemma of_real_sin_of_real_re (x : ℝ) : ((sin x).re : ℂ) = sin x :=
eq_conj_iff_re.1 $ by rw [← sin_conj, conj_of_real]
@[simp] lemma of_real_sin (x : ℝ) : (real.sin x : ℂ) = sin x :=
of_real_sin_of_real_re _
@[simp] lemma sin_of_real_im (x : ℝ) : (sin x).im = 0 :=
by rw [← of_real_sin_of_real_re, of_real_im]
lemma sin_of_real_re (x : ℝ) : (sin x).re = real.sin x := rfl
lemma cos_conj : cos (conj x) = conj (cos x) :=
by rw [← cosh_mul_I, ← conj_neg_I, ← conj_mul, ← cosh_mul_I,
cosh_conj, mul_neg_eq_neg_mul_symm, cosh_neg]
@[simp] lemma of_real_cos_of_real_re (x : ℝ) : ((cos x).re : ℂ) = cos x :=
eq_conj_iff_re.1 $ by rw [← cos_conj, conj_of_real]
@[simp] lemma of_real_cos (x : ℝ) : (real.cos x : ℂ) = cos x :=
of_real_cos_of_real_re _
@[simp] lemma cos_of_real_im (x : ℝ) : (cos x).im = 0 :=
by rw [← of_real_cos_of_real_re, of_real_im]
lemma cos_of_real_re (x : ℝ) : (cos x).re = real.cos x := rfl
@[simp] lemma tan_zero : tan 0 = 0 := by simp [tan]
lemma tan_eq_sin_div_cos : tan x = sin x / cos x := rfl
@[simp] lemma tan_neg : tan (-x) = -tan x := by simp [tan, neg_div]
lemma tan_conj : tan (conj x) = conj (tan x) :=
by rw [tan, sin_conj, cos_conj, ← conj_div, tan]
@[simp] lemma of_real_tan_of_real_re (x : ℝ) : ((tan x).re : ℂ) = tan x :=
eq_conj_iff_re.1 $ by rw [← tan_conj, conj_of_real]
@[simp] lemma of_real_tan (x : ℝ) : (real.tan x : ℂ) = tan x :=
of_real_tan_of_real_re _
@[simp] lemma tan_of_real_im (x : ℝ) : (tan x).im = 0 :=
by rw [← of_real_tan_of_real_re, of_real_im]
lemma tan_of_real_re (x : ℝ) : (tan x).re = real.tan x := rfl
lemma cos_add_sin_I : cos x + sin x * I = exp (x * I) :=
by rw [← cosh_add_sinh, sinh_mul_I, cosh_mul_I]
lemma cos_sub_sin_I : cos x - sin x * I = exp (-x * I) :=
by rw [← neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, ← cosh_sub_sinh, sinh_mul_I, cosh_mul_I]
lemma sin_sq_add_cos_sq : sin x ^ 2 + cos x ^ 2 = 1 :=
eq.trans
(by rw [cosh_mul_I, sinh_mul_I, mul_pow, I_sq, mul_neg_one, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm])
(cosh_sq_sub_sinh_sq (x * I))
lemma cos_two_mul' : cos (2 * x) = cos x ^ 2 - sin x ^ 2 :=
by rw [two_mul, cos_add, ← pow_two, ← pow_two]
lemma cos_two_mul : cos (2 * x) = 2 * cos x ^ 2 - 1 :=
by rw [cos_two_mul', eq_sub_iff_add_eq.2 (sin_sq_add_cos_sq x),
← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, two_mul]
lemma sin_two_mul : sin (2 * x) = 2 * sin x * cos x :=
by rw [two_mul, sin_add, two_mul, add_mul, mul_comm]
lemma cos_square : cos x ^ 2 = 1 / 2 + cos (2 * x) / 2 :=
by simp [cos_two_mul, div_add_div_same, mul_div_cancel_left, two_ne_zero', -one_div_eq_inv]
lemma sin_square : sin x ^ 2 = 1 - cos x ^ 2 :=
by { rw [←sin_sq_add_cos_sq x], simp }
lemma exp_mul_I : exp (x * I) = cos x + sin x * I :=
(cos_add_sin_I _).symm
lemma exp_add_mul_I : exp (x + y * I) = exp x * (cos y + sin y * I) :=
by rw [exp_add, exp_mul_I]
lemma exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos : exp x = exp x.re * (cos x.im + sin x.im * I) :=
by rw [← exp_add_mul_I, re_add_im]
theorem cos_add_sin_mul_I_pow (n : ℕ) (z : ℂ) : (cos z + sin z * I) ^ n = cos (↑n * z) + sin (↑n * z) * I :=
begin
rw [← exp_mul_I, ← exp_mul_I],
induction n with n ih,
{ rw [pow_zero, nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, zero_mul, exp_zero] },
{ rw [pow_succ', ih, nat.cast_succ, add_mul, add_mul, one_mul, exp_add] }
end
end complex
namespace real
open complex
variables (x y : ℝ)
@[simp] lemma exp_zero : exp 0 = 1 :=
by simp [real.exp]
lemma exp_add : exp (x + y) = exp x * exp y :=
by simp [exp_add, exp]
lemma exp_nat_mul (x : ℝ) : ∀ n : ℕ, exp(n*x) = (exp x)^n
| 0 := by rw [nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, exp_zero, pow_zero]
| (nat.succ n) := by rw [pow_succ', nat.cast_add_one, add_mul, exp_add, ←exp_nat_mul, one_mul]
lemma exp_ne_zero : exp x ≠ 0 :=
λ h, exp_ne_zero x $ by rw [exp, ← of_real_inj] at h; simp * at *
lemma exp_neg : exp (-x) = (exp x)⁻¹ :=
by rw [← of_real_inj, exp, of_real_exp_of_real_re, of_real_neg, exp_neg,
of_real_inv, of_real_exp]
lemma exp_sub : exp (x - y) = exp x / exp y :=
by simp [exp_add, exp_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
@[simp] lemma sin_zero : sin 0 = 0 := by simp [sin]
@[simp] lemma sin_neg : sin (-x) = -sin x :=
by simp [sin, exp_neg, (neg_div _ _).symm, add_mul]
lemma sin_add : sin (x + y) = sin x * cos y + cos x * sin y :=
by rw [← of_real_inj]; simp [sin, sin_add]
@[simp] lemma cos_zero : cos 0 = 1 := by simp [cos]
@[simp] lemma cos_neg : cos (-x) = cos x :=
by simp [cos, exp_neg]
lemma cos_add : cos (x + y) = cos x * cos y - sin x * sin y :=
by rw ← of_real_inj; simp [cos, cos_add]
lemma sin_sub : sin (x - y) = sin x * cos y - cos x * sin y :=
by simp [sin_add, sin_neg, cos_neg]
lemma cos_sub : cos (x - y) = cos x * cos y + sin x * sin y :=
by simp [cos_add, sin_neg, cos_neg]
lemma tan_eq_sin_div_cos : tan x = sin x / cos x :=
if h : complex.cos x = 0 then by simp [sin, cos, tan, *, complex.tan, div_eq_mul_inv] at *
else
by rw [sin, cos, tan, complex.tan, ← of_real_inj, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_re];
simp [norm_sq, (div_div_eq_div_mul _ _ _).symm, div_self h]; refl
@[simp] lemma tan_zero : tan 0 = 0 := by simp [tan]
@[simp] lemma tan_neg : tan (-x) = -tan x := by simp [tan, neg_div]
lemma sin_sq_add_cos_sq : sin x ^ 2 + cos x ^ 2 = 1 :=
of_real_inj.1 $ by simpa using sin_sq_add_cos_sq x
lemma sin_sq_le_one : sin x ^ 2 ≤ 1 :=
by rw ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq x; exact le_add_of_nonneg_right' (pow_two_nonneg _)
lemma cos_sq_le_one : cos x ^ 2 ≤ 1 :=
by rw ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq x; exact le_add_of_nonneg_left' (pow_two_nonneg _)
lemma abs_sin_le_one : abs' (sin x) ≤ 1 :=
(mul_self_le_mul_self_iff (_root_.abs_nonneg (sin x)) (by exact zero_le_one)).2 $
by rw [← _root_.abs_mul, abs_mul_self, mul_one, ← pow_two];
apply sin_sq_le_one
lemma abs_cos_le_one : abs' (cos x) ≤ 1 :=
(mul_self_le_mul_self_iff (_root_.abs_nonneg (cos x)) (by exact zero_le_one)).2 $
by rw [← _root_.abs_mul, abs_mul_self, mul_one, ← pow_two];
apply cos_sq_le_one
lemma sin_le_one : sin x ≤ 1 :=
(abs_le.1 (abs_sin_le_one _)).2
lemma cos_le_one : cos x ≤ 1 :=
(abs_le.1 (abs_cos_le_one _)).2
lemma neg_one_le_sin : -1 ≤ sin x :=
(abs_le.1 (abs_sin_le_one _)).1
lemma neg_one_le_cos : -1 ≤ cos x :=
(abs_le.1 (abs_cos_le_one _)).1
lemma cos_two_mul : cos (2 * x) = 2 * cos x ^ 2 - 1 :=
by rw ← of_real_inj; simp [cos_two_mul]
lemma sin_two_mul : sin (2 * x) = 2 * sin x * cos x :=
by rw ← of_real_inj; simp [sin_two_mul]
lemma cos_square : cos x ^ 2 = 1 / 2 + cos (2 * x) / 2 :=
of_real_inj.1 $ by simpa using cos_square x
lemma sin_square : sin x ^ 2 = 1 - cos x ^ 2 :=
eq_sub_iff_add_eq.2 $ sin_sq_add_cos_sq _
@[simp] lemma sinh_zero : sinh 0 = 0 := by simp [sinh]
@[simp] lemma sinh_neg : sinh (-x) = -sinh x :=
by simp [sinh, exp_neg, (neg_div _ _).symm, add_mul]
lemma sinh_add : sinh (x + y) = sinh x * cosh y + cosh x * sinh y :=
by rw ← of_real_inj; simp [sinh_add]
@[simp] lemma cosh_zero : cosh 0 = 1 := by simp [cosh]
@[simp] lemma cosh_neg : cosh (-x) = cosh x :=
by simp [cosh, exp_neg]
lemma cosh_add : cosh (x + y) = cosh x * cosh y + sinh x * sinh y :=
by rw ← of_real_inj; simp [cosh, cosh_add]
lemma sinh_sub : sinh (x - y) = sinh x * cosh y - cosh x * sinh y :=
by simp [sinh_add, sinh_neg, cosh_neg]
lemma cosh_sub : cosh (x - y) = cosh x * cosh y - sinh x * sinh y :=
by simp [cosh_add, sinh_neg, cosh_neg]
lemma tanh_eq_sinh_div_cosh : tanh x = sinh x / cosh x :=
of_real_inj.1 $ by simp [tanh_eq_sinh_div_cosh]
@[simp] lemma tanh_zero : tanh 0 = 0 := by simp [tanh]
@[simp] lemma tanh_neg : tanh (-x) = -tanh x := by simp [tanh, neg_div]
open is_absolute_value
/- TODO make this private and prove ∀ x -/
lemma add_one_le_exp_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x + 1 ≤ exp x :=
calc x + 1 ≤ lim (⟨(λ n : ℕ, ((exp' x) n).re), is_cau_seq_re (exp' x)⟩ : cau_seq ℝ abs') :
le_lim (cau_seq.le_of_exists ⟨2,
λ j hj, show x + (1 : ℝ) ≤ ((range j).sum (λ m, (x ^ m / m.fact : ℂ))).re,
from have h₁ : (((λ m : ℕ, (x ^ m / m.fact : ℂ)) ∘ nat.succ) 0).re = x, by simp,
have h₂ : ((x : ℂ) ^ 0 / nat.fact 0).re = 1, by simp,
begin
rw [← nat.sub_add_cancel hj, sum_range_succ', sum_range_succ',
add_re, add_re, h₁, h₂, add_assoc,
← @sum_hom _ _ _ _ _ _ _ complex.re
(is_add_group_hom.to_is_add_monoid_hom _)],
refine le_add_of_nonneg_of_le (sum_nonneg (λ m hm, _)) (le_refl _), dsimp [-nat.fact_succ],
rw [← of_real_pow, ← of_real_nat_cast, ← of_real_div, of_real_re],
exact div_nonneg (pow_nonneg hx _) (nat.cast_pos.2 (nat.fact_pos _)),
end⟩)
... = exp x : by rw [exp, complex.exp, ← cau_seq_re, lim_re]
lemma one_le_exp {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 1 ≤ exp x :=
by linarith [add_one_le_exp_of_nonneg hx]
lemma exp_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < exp x :=
(le_total 0 x).elim (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one ∘ one_le_exp)
(λ h, by rw [← neg_neg x, real.exp_neg];
exact inv_pos (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (one_le_exp (neg_nonneg.2 h))))
@[simp] lemma abs_exp (x : ℝ) : abs' (exp x) = exp x :=
abs_of_pos (exp_pos _)
lemma exp_strict_mono : strict_mono exp :=
λ x y h, by rw [← sub_add_cancel y x, real.exp_add];
exact (lt_mul_iff_one_lt_left (exp_pos _)).2
(lt_of_lt_of_le (by linarith) (add_one_le_exp_of_nonneg (by linarith)))
lemma exp_lt_exp {x y : ℝ} : exp x < exp y ↔ x < y := exp_strict_mono.lt_iff_lt
lemma exp_le_exp {x y : ℝ} : exp x ≤ exp y ↔ x ≤ y := exp_strict_mono.le_iff_le
lemma exp_injective : function.injective exp := exp_strict_mono.injective
@[simp] lemma exp_eq_one_iff : exp x = 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
by rw [← exp_zero, exp_injective.eq_iff]
lemma one_lt_exp_iff {x : ℝ} : 1 < exp x ↔ 0 < x :=
by rw [← exp_zero, exp_lt_exp]
lemma exp_lt_one_iff {x : ℝ} : exp x < 1 ↔ x < 0 :=
by rw [← exp_zero, exp_lt_exp]
end real
namespace complex
lemma sum_div_fact_le {α : Type*} [discrete_linear_ordered_field α] (n j : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
(sum (filter (λ k, n ≤ k) (range j)) (λ m : ℕ, (1 / m.fact : α))) ≤ n.succ * (n.fact * n)⁻¹ :=
calc (filter (λ k, n ≤ k) (range j)).sum (λ m : ℕ, (1 / m.fact : α))
= (range (j - n)).sum (λ m, 1 / (m + n).fact) :
sum_bij (λ m _, m - n)
(λ m hm, mem_range.2 $ (nat.sub_lt_sub_right_iff (by simp at hm; tauto)).2
(by simp at hm; tauto))
(λ m hm, by rw nat.sub_add_cancel; simp at *; tauto)
(λ a₁ a₂ ha₁ ha₂ h,
by rwa [nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add, ← nat.sub_add_comm, eq_comm, nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add, add_right_inj, eq_comm] at h;
simp at *; tauto)
(λ b hb, ⟨b + n, mem_filter.2 ⟨mem_range.2 $ nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub_right (mem_range.1 hb), nat.le_add_left _ _⟩,
by rw nat.add_sub_cancel⟩)
... ≤ (range (j - n)).sum (λ m, (nat.fact n * n.succ ^ m)⁻¹) :
begin
refine sum_le_sum (assume m n, _),
rw [one_div_eq_inv, inv_le_inv],
{ rw [← nat.cast_pow, ← nat.cast_mul, nat.cast_le, add_comm],
exact nat.fact_mul_pow_le_fact },
{ exact nat.cast_pos.2 (nat.fact_pos _) },
{ exact mul_pos (nat.cast_pos.2 (nat.fact_pos _)) (pow_pos (nat.cast_pos.2 (nat.succ_pos _)) _) },
end
... = (nat.fact n)⁻¹ * (range (j - n)).sum (λ m, n.succ⁻¹ ^ m) :
by simp [mul_inv', mul_sum.symm, sum_mul.symm, -nat.fact_succ, mul_comm, inv_pow']
... = (n.succ - n.succ * n.succ⁻¹ ^ (j - n)) / (n.fact * n) :
have h₁ : (n.succ : α) ≠ 1, from @nat.cast_one α _ _ ▸ mt nat.cast_inj.1
(mt nat.succ_inj (nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 hn)),
have h₂ : (n.succ : α) ≠ 0, from nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (nat.succ_ne_zero _),
have h₃ : (n.fact * n : α) ≠ 0, from mul_ne_zero (nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 (nat.fact_pos _)))
(nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 hn)),
have h₄ : (n.succ - 1 : α) = n, by simp,
by rw [← geom_series_def, geom_sum_inv h₁ h₂, eq_div_iff_mul_eq _ _ h₃, mul_comm _ (n.fact * n : α),
← mul_assoc (n.fact⁻¹ : α), ← mul_inv', h₄, ← mul_assoc (n.fact * n : α),
mul_comm (n : α) n.fact, mul_inv_cancel h₃];
simp [mul_add, add_mul, mul_assoc, mul_comm]
... ≤ n.succ / (n.fact * n) :
begin
refine (div_le_div_right (mul_pos _ _)).2 _,
exact nat.cast_pos.2 (nat.fact_pos _),
exact nat.cast_pos.2 hn,
exact sub_le_self _ (mul_nonneg (nat.cast_nonneg _) (pow_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 (nat.cast_nonneg _)) _))
end
lemma exp_bound {x : ℂ} (hx : abs x ≤ 1) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
abs (exp x - (range n).sum (λ m, x ^ m / m.fact)) ≤ abs x ^ n * (n.succ * (n.fact * n)⁻¹) :=
begin
rw [← lim_const ((range n).sum _), exp, sub_eq_add_neg, ← lim_neg, lim_add, ← lim_abs],
refine lim_le (cau_seq.le_of_exists ⟨n, λ j hj, _⟩),
show abs ((range j).sum (λ m, x ^ m / m.fact) - (range n).sum (λ m, x ^ m / m.fact))
≤ abs x ^ n * (n.succ * (n.fact * n)⁻¹),
rw sum_range_sub_sum_range hj,
exact calc abs (((range j).filter (λ k, n ≤ k)).sum (λ m : ℕ, (x ^ m / m.fact : ℂ)))
= abs (((range j).filter (λ k, n ≤ k)).sum (λ m : ℕ, (x ^ n * (x ^ (m - n) / m.fact) : ℂ))) :
congr_arg abs (sum_congr rfl (λ m hm, by rw [← mul_div_assoc, ← pow_add, nat.add_sub_cancel']; simp at hm; tauto))
... ≤ sum (filter (λ k, n ≤ k) (range j)) (λ m, abs (x ^ n * (_ / m.fact))) : abv_sum_le_sum_abv _ _
... ≤ sum (filter (λ k, n ≤ k) (range j)) (λ m, abs x ^ n * (1 / m.fact)) :
begin
refine sum_le_sum (λ m hm, _),
rw [abs_mul, abv_pow abs, abs_div, abs_cast_nat],
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ((div_le_div_right _).2 _) _,
exact nat.cast_pos.2 (nat.fact_pos _),
rw abv_pow abs,
exact (pow_le_one _ (abs_nonneg _) hx),
exact pow_nonneg (abs_nonneg _) _
end
... = abs x ^ n * (((range j).filter (λ k, n ≤ k)).sum (λ m : ℕ, (1 / m.fact : ℝ))) :
by simp [abs_mul, abv_pow abs, abs_div, mul_sum.symm]
... ≤ abs x ^ n * (n.succ * (n.fact * n)⁻¹) :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (sum_div_fact_le _ _ hn) (pow_nonneg (abs_nonneg _) _)
end
lemma abs_exp_sub_one_le {x : ℂ} (hx : abs x ≤ 1) :
abs (exp x - 1) ≤ 2 * abs x :=
calc abs (exp x - 1) = abs (exp x - (range 1).sum (λ m, x ^ m / m.fact)) :
by simp [sum_range_succ]
... ≤ abs x ^ 1 * ((nat.succ 1) * (nat.fact 1 * (1 : ℕ))⁻¹) :
exp_bound hx dec_trivial
... = 2 * abs x : by simp [two_mul, mul_two, mul_add, mul_comm]
lemma abs_exp_sub_one_sub_id_le {x : ℂ} (hx : abs x ≤ 1) :
abs (exp x - 1 - x) ≤ (abs x)^2 :=
calc abs (exp x - 1 - x) = abs (exp x - (range 2).sum (λ m, x ^ m / m.fact)) :
by simp [sum_range_succ]
... ≤ (abs x)^2 * (nat.succ 2 * (nat.fact 2 * (2 : ℕ))⁻¹) :
exp_bound hx dec_trivial
... ≤ (abs x)^2 * 1 :
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (by norm_num) (pow_two_nonneg (abs x))
... = (abs x)^2 :
by rw [mul_one]
end complex
namespace real
open complex finset
lemma cos_bound {x : ℝ} (hx : abs' x ≤ 1) : abs' (cos x - (1 - x ^ 2 / 2)) ≤ abs' x ^ 4 * (5 / 96) :=
calc abs' (cos x - (1 - x ^ 2 / 2)) = abs (complex.cos x - (1 - x ^ 2 / 2)) :
by rw ← abs_of_real; simp [of_real_bit0, of_real_one, of_real_inv]
... = abs ((complex.exp (x * I) + complex.exp (-x * I) - (2 - x ^ 2)) / 2) :
by simp [complex.cos, sub_div, add_div, neg_div, div_self (@two_ne_zero' ℂ _ _ _)]
... = abs (((complex.exp (x * I) - (range 4).sum (λ m, (x * I) ^ m / m.fact)) +
((complex.exp (-x * I) - (range 4).sum (λ m, (-x * I) ^ m / m.fact)))) / 2) :
congr_arg abs (congr_arg (λ x : ℂ, x / 2) begin
simp only [sum_range_succ],
simp [pow_succ],
apply complex.ext; simp [div_eq_mul_inv, norm_sq]; ring
end)
... ≤ abs ((complex.exp (x * I) - (range 4).sum (λ m, (x * I) ^ m / m.fact)) / 2) +
abs ((complex.exp (-x * I) - (range 4).sum (λ m, (-x * I) ^ m / m.fact)) / 2) :
by rw add_div; exact abs_add _ _
... = (abs ((complex.exp (x * I) - (range 4).sum (λ m, (x * I) ^ m / m.fact))) / 2 +
abs ((complex.exp (-x * I) - (range 4).sum (λ m, (-x * I) ^ m / m.fact))) / 2) :
by simp [complex.abs_div]
... ≤ ((complex.abs (x * I) ^ 4 * (nat.succ 4 * (nat.fact 4 * (4 : ℕ))⁻¹)) / 2 +
(complex.abs (-x * I) ^ 4 * (nat.succ 4 * (nat.fact 4 * (4 : ℕ))⁻¹)) / 2) :
add_le_add ((div_le_div_right (by norm_num)).2 (exp_bound (by simpa) dec_trivial))
((div_le_div_right (by norm_num)).2 (exp_bound (by simpa) dec_trivial))
... ≤ abs' x ^ 4 * (5 / 96) : by norm_num; simp [mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, mul_div_assoc]
lemma sin_bound {x : ℝ} (hx : abs' x ≤ 1) : abs' (sin x - (x - x ^ 3 / 6)) ≤ abs' x ^ 4 * (5 / 96) :=
calc abs' (sin x - (x - x ^ 3 / 6)) = abs (complex.sin x - (x - x ^ 3 / 6)) :
by rw ← abs_of_real; simp [of_real_bit0, of_real_one, of_real_inv]
... = abs (((complex.exp (-x * I) - complex.exp (x * I)) * I - (2 * x - x ^ 3 / 3)) / 2) :
by simp [complex.sin, sub_div, add_div, neg_div, mul_div_cancel_left _ (@two_ne_zero' ℂ _ _ _),
div_div_eq_div_mul, show (3 : ℂ) * 2 = 6, by norm_num]
... = abs ((((complex.exp (-x * I) - (range 4).sum (λ m, (-x * I) ^ m / m.fact)) -
(complex.exp (x * I) - (range 4).sum (λ m, (x * I) ^ m / m.fact))) * I) / 2) :
congr_arg abs (congr_arg (λ x : ℂ, x / 2) begin
simp only [sum_range_succ],
simp [pow_succ],
apply complex.ext; simp [div_eq_mul_inv, norm_sq]; ring
end)
... ≤ abs ((complex.exp (-x * I) - (range 4).sum (λ m, (-x * I) ^ m / m.fact)) * I / 2) +
abs (-((complex.exp (x * I) - (range 4).sum (λ m, (x * I) ^ m / m.fact)) * I) / 2) :
by rw [sub_mul, sub_eq_add_neg, add_div]; exact abs_add _ _
... = (abs ((complex.exp (x * I) - (range 4).sum (λ m, (x * I) ^ m / m.fact))) / 2 +
abs ((complex.exp (-x * I) - (range 4).sum (λ m, (-x * I) ^ m / m.fact))) / 2) :
by simp [complex.abs_div, complex.abs_mul]
... ≤ ((complex.abs (x * I) ^ 4 * (nat.succ 4 * (nat.fact 4 * (4 : ℕ))⁻¹)) / 2 +
(complex.abs (-x * I) ^ 4 * (nat.succ 4 * (nat.fact 4 * (4 : ℕ))⁻¹)) / 2) :
add_le_add ((div_le_div_right (by norm_num)).2 (exp_bound (by simpa) dec_trivial))
((div_le_div_right (by norm_num)).2 (exp_bound (by simpa) dec_trivial))
... ≤ abs' x ^ 4 * (5 / 96) : by norm_num; simp [mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, mul_div_assoc]
lemma cos_pos_of_le_one {x : ℝ} (hx : abs' x ≤ 1) : 0 < cos x :=
calc 0 < (1 - x ^ 2 / 2) - abs' x ^ 4 * (5 / 96) :
sub_pos.2 $ lt_sub_iff_add_lt.2
(calc abs' x ^ 4 * (5 / 96) + x ^ 2 / 2
≤ 1 * (5 / 96) + 1 / 2 :
add_le_add
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (pow_le_one _ (abs_nonneg _) hx) (by norm_num))
((div_le_div_right (by norm_num)).2 (by rw [pow_two, ← abs_mul_self, _root_.abs_mul];
exact mul_le_one hx (abs_nonneg _) hx))
... < 1 : by norm_num)
... ≤ cos x : sub_le.1 (abs_sub_le_iff.1 (cos_bound hx)).2
lemma sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_one {x : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx : x ≤ 1) : 0 < sin x :=
calc 0 < x - x ^ 3 / 6 - abs' x ^ 4 * (5 / 96) :
sub_pos.2 $ lt_sub_iff_add_lt.2
(calc abs' x ^ 4 * (5 / 96) + x ^ 3 / 6
≤ x * (5 / 96) + x / 6 :
add_le_add
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right
(calc abs' x ^ 4 ≤ abs' x ^ 1 : pow_le_pow_of_le_one (abs_nonneg _)
(by rwa _root_.abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hx0))
dec_trivial
... = x : by simp [_root_.abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt (hx0))]) (by norm_num))
((div_le_div_right (by norm_num)).2
(calc x ^ 3 ≤ x ^ 1 : pow_le_pow_of_le_one (le_of_lt hx0) hx dec_trivial
... = x : pow_one _))
... < x : by linarith)
... ≤ sin x : sub_le.1 (abs_sub_le_iff.1 (sin_bound
(by rwa [_root_.abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hx0)]))).2
lemma sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two {x : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx : x ≤ 2) : 0 < sin x :=
have x / 2 ≤ 1, from div_le_of_le_mul (by norm_num) (by simpa),
calc 0 < 2 * sin (x / 2) * cos (x / 2) :
mul_pos (mul_pos (by norm_num) (sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_one (half_pos hx0) this))
(cos_pos_of_le_one (by rwa [_root_.abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt (half_pos hx0))]))
... = sin x : by rw [← sin_two_mul, two_mul, add_halves]
lemma cos_one_le : cos 1 ≤ 2 / 3 :=
calc cos 1 ≤ abs' (1 : ℝ) ^ 4 * (5 / 96) + (1 - 1 ^ 2 / 2) :
sub_le_iff_le_add.1 (abs_sub_le_iff.1 (cos_bound (by simp))).1
... ≤ 2 / 3 : by norm_num
lemma cos_one_pos : 0 < cos 1 := cos_pos_of_le_one (by simp)
lemma cos_two_neg : cos 2 < 0 :=
calc cos 2 = cos (2 * 1) : congr_arg cos (mul_one _).symm
... = _ : real.cos_two_mul 1
... ≤ 2 * (2 / 3) ^ 2 - 1 :
sub_le_sub_right (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left
(by rw [pow_two, pow_two]; exact
mul_self_le_mul_self (le_of_lt cos_one_pos)
cos_one_le)
(by norm_num)) _
... < 0 : by norm_num
end real
namespace complex
lemma abs_cos_add_sin_mul_I (x : ℝ) : abs (cos x + sin x * I) = 1 :=
have _ := real.sin_sq_add_cos_sq x,
by simp [abs, norm_sq, pow_two, *, sin_of_real_re, cos_of_real_re, mul_re] at *
lemma abs_exp_eq_iff_re_eq {x y : ℂ} : abs (exp x) = abs (exp y) ↔ x.re = y.re :=
by rw [exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos, exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos y,
abs_mul, abs_mul, abs_cos_add_sin_mul_I, abs_cos_add_sin_mul_I,
← of_real_exp, ← of_real_exp, abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt (real.exp_pos _)),
abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt (real.exp_pos _)), mul_one, mul_one];
exact ⟨λ h, real.exp_injective h, congr_arg _⟩
@[simp] lemma abs_exp_of_real (x : ℝ) : abs (exp x) = real.exp x :=
by rw [← of_real_exp]; exact abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt (real.exp_pos _))
end complex
|
a4673eee2452f7161edc76f192cb5a17da6c7277 | e151e9053bfd6d71740066474fc500a087837323 | /src/hott/types/nat/hott.lean | fe1cf8591695007d80cc8eae8060bb36ad42d14c | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | daniel-carranza/hott3 | 15bac2d90589dbb952ef15e74b2837722491963d | 913811e8a1371d3a5751d7d32ff9dec8aa6815d9 | refs/heads/master | 1,610,091,349,670 | 1,596,222,336,000 | 1,596,222,336,000 | 241,957,822 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,582,222,839,000 | 1,582,222,838,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 9,901 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Floris van Doorn
Theorems about the natural numbers specific to HoTT
-/
import .order ..pointed .sub
universes u v w
hott_theory
namespace hott
open nat is_trunc hott.algebra hott.is_equiv hott.equiv
namespace nat
@[hott, instance] def is_prop_le (n m : ℕ) : is_prop (n ≤ m) :=
begin
have lem : Π{n m : ℕ} (p : n ≤ m) (q : n = m), p = nat.le_of_eq q,
begin
intros, hinduction p with m p IH,
{ have H' : idp = q, by apply is_set.elim,
hinduction H', reflexivity },
{ hinduction q using eq.rec_symm, apply empty.elim, apply not_succ_le_self p }
end,
have lem2 : Π{n m k : ℕ} (p : n ≤ m) (q : succ k = m) (r : n ≤ k),
Σs : n ≤ k, p = transport (le n) q (le.step s),
begin
intros, hinduction p with m p IH,
{ hinduction q, apply empty.elim, exact not_succ_le_self r },
{ have : Σr, ap succ r = q, exact ⟨succ.inj q, is_set.elim _ _⟩,
hinduction this with r s, hinduction s, hinduction r,
exact ⟨p, idp⟩ }
end,
apply is_prop.mk, intros H1 H2, hinduction H2 with m H2 IH,
{ exact lem H1 idp },
{ hinduction lem2 H1 idp H2 with x H3 p, refine p ⬝ ap le.step _,
apply IH },
end
@[hott, instance] def is_prop_lt (n m : ℕ) : is_prop (n < m) := is_prop_le _ _
@[hott] def le_equiv_succ_le_succ (n m : ℕ) : (n ≤ m) ≃ (succ n ≤ succ m) :=
equiv_of_is_prop succ_le_succ le_of_succ_le_succ
@[hott] theorem le_succ_equiv_pred_le (n m : ℕ) : (n ≤ succ m) ≃ (pred n ≤ m) :=
equiv_of_is_prop pred_le_pred le_succ_of_pred_le
@[hott] theorem lt_by_cases_lt {a b : ℕ} {P : Type _} (H1 : a < b → P) (H2 : a = b → P)
(H3 : a > b → P) (H : a < b) : lt.by_cases H1 H2 H3 = H1 H :=
begin
dsimp [lt.by_cases], hinduction (lt.trichotomy a b) with p H' H',
{ exact ap H1 (is_prop.elim _ _)},
{ apply empty.elim, cases H' with H' H', apply lt.irrefl b, exact H' ▸ H,
exact lt.asymm H H'}
end
@[hott] theorem lt_by_cases_eq {a b : ℕ} {P : Type _} (H1 : a < b → P) (H2 : a = b → P)
(H3 : a > b → P) (H : a = b) : lt.by_cases H1 H2 H3 = H2 H :=
begin
dsimp [lt.by_cases], induction (lt.trichotomy a b) with H' H',
{ apply empty.elim, apply lt.irrefl b, exact H ▸ H'},
{ cases H' with H' H', exact ap H2 (is_prop.elim _ _), apply empty.elim , apply lt.irrefl b,
exact H ▸ H'}
end
@[hott] theorem lt_by_cases_ge {a b : ℕ} {P : Type _} (H1 : a < b → P) (H2 : a = b → P)
(H3 : a > b → P) (H : a > b) : lt.by_cases H1 H2 H3 = H3 H :=
begin
dsimp [lt.by_cases], induction (lt.trichotomy a b) with H' H',
{ apply empty.elim, exact lt.asymm H H'},
{ cases H' with H' H', apply empty.elim, apply lt.irrefl b, exact H' ▸ H,
exact ap H3 (is_prop.elim _ _)}
end
@[hott] theorem lt_ge_by_cases_lt {n m : ℕ} {P : Type _} (H1 : n < m → P) (H2 : n ≥ m → P)
(H : n < m) : lt_ge_by_cases H1 H2 = H1 H :=
by apply lt_by_cases_lt
@[hott] theorem lt_ge_by_cases_ge {n m : ℕ} {P : Type _} (H1 : n < m → P) (H2 : n ≥ m → P)
(H : n ≥ m) : lt_ge_by_cases H1 H2 = H2 H :=
begin
dsimp [lt_ge_by_cases,lt.by_cases], induction (lt.trichotomy n m) with H' H',
{ apply empty.elim, apply lt.irrefl m, exact lt_of_le_of_lt H H'},
{ cases H' with H' H'; apply ap H2 (is_prop.elim _ _)}
end
@[hott] theorem lt_ge_by_cases_le {n m : ℕ} {P : Type _} {H1 : n ≤ m → P} {H2 : n ≥ m → P}
(H : n ≤ m) (Heq : Π(p : n = m), H1 (le_of_eq p) = H2 (le_of_eq p⁻¹))
: lt_ge_by_cases (λH', H1 (le_of_lt H')) H2 = H1 H :=
begin
dsimp [lt_ge_by_cases,lt.by_cases], induction (lt.trichotomy n m) with H' H',
{ apply ap H1 (is_prop.elim _ _)},
{ cases H' with H' H',
{ induction H', symmetry,
exact ap H1 (is_prop.elim _ _) ⬝ Heq idp ⬝ ap H2 (is_prop.elim _ _)},
{ apply empty.elim, apply lt.irrefl n, apply lt_of_le_of_lt H H'}}
end
@[hott] def nat_eq_equiv (n m : ℕ) : (n = m) ≃ nat.code n m :=
equiv.MK nat.encode
(nat.decode n m)
begin
revert m, induction n; intro m; induction m; intro c,
induction c, reflexivity,
exact empty.elim c,
exact empty.elim c,
dsimp [nat.decode, nat.encode], rwr [←tr_compose], apply n_ih
end
begin
intro p, induction p, induction n,
reflexivity,
exact ap02 succ n_ih
end
@[hott, instance] def pointed_nat : pointed ℕ :=
pointed.mk 0
open sigma sum
@[hott] def eq_even_or_eq_odd (n : ℕ) : (Σk, 2 * k = n) ⊎ (Σk, 2 * k + 1 = n) :=
begin
induction n with n IH,
{ exact inl ⟨0, idp⟩},
{ induction IH with H H; induction H with k p; induction p,
{ exact inr ⟨k, idp⟩},
{ refine inl ⟨k+1, idp⟩}}
end
@[hott] def rec_on_even_odd {P : ℕ → Type _} (n : ℕ) (H : Πk, P (2 * k)) (H2 : Πk, P (2 * k + 1))
: P n :=
begin
cases eq_even_or_eq_odd n with v v; induction v with k p; induction p,
{ exact H k},
{ exact H2 k}
end
/- this inequality comes up a couple of times when using the freudenthal suspension @[hott] theorem -/
@[hott] theorem add_mul_le_mul_add (n m k : ℕ) : n + (succ m) * k ≤ (succ m) * (n + k) :=
calc
n + (succ m) * k ≤ (m * n + n) + (succ m) * k : add_le_add_right (le_add_left _ _) _
... = (succ m) * n + (succ m) * k : by rwr ←succ_mul
... = (succ m) * (n + k) : by rwr ←hott.algebra.left_distrib
/-
Some operations work only for successors. For example fin (succ n) has a 0 and a 1, but fin 0
doesn't. However, we want a bit more, because sometimes we want a zero of (fin a)
where a is either
- equal to a successor, but not definitionally a successor (e.g. (0 : fin (3 + n)))
- definitionally equal to a successor, but not in a way that type class inference can infer.
(e.g. (0 : fin 4). Note that 4 is bit0 (bit0 one), but (bit0 x) (defined as x + x),
is not always a successor)
To solve this we use an auxillary class `is_succ` which can solve whether a number is a
successor.
-/
@[hott, class] inductive is_succ : ℕ → Type
| mk : Π(n : ℕ), is_succ (succ n)
attribute [instance] is_succ.mk
@[hott, instance] def is_succ_1 : is_succ 1 := is_succ.mk 0
@[hott, instance] def is_succ_add_right (n m : ℕ) [H : is_succ m] : is_succ (n+m) :=
by unfreezeI; induction H with m; constructor
@[hott, instance, priority 900] def is_succ_add_left (n m : ℕ) [H : is_succ n] :
is_succ (n+m) :=
by unfreezeI; induction H with n; cases m with m; constructor
@[hott] def is_succ_bit0 (n : ℕ) [H : is_succ n] : is_succ (bit0 n) :=
by dsimp [bit0]; apply_instance
-- level 2 is useful for abelian homotopy groups, which only exist at level 2 and higher
@[hott, class] inductive is_at_least_two : ℕ → Type
| mk : Π(n : ℕ), is_at_least_two (succ (succ n))
attribute [instance] is_at_least_two.mk
@[hott, instance] def is_at_least_two_succ (n : ℕ) [H : is_succ n] :
is_at_least_two (succ n) :=
by unfreezeI; induction H with n; constructor
@[hott, instance] def is_at_least_two_add_right (n m : ℕ) [H : is_at_least_two m] :
is_at_least_two (n+m) :=
by unfreezeI; induction H with m; constructor
@[hott, instance] def is_at_least_two_add_left (n m : ℕ) [H : is_at_least_two n] :
is_at_least_two (n+m) :=
by unfreezeI; induction H with n; cases m with m; try { cases m with m }; constructor
@[hott, instance, priority 900] def is_at_least_two_add_both (n m : ℕ)
[H : is_succ n] [K : is_succ m] : is_at_least_two (n+m) :=
by unfreezeI; induction H with n; induction K with m; cases m with m; constructor
@[hott] def is_at_least_two_bit0 (n : ℕ) [H : is_succ n] : is_at_least_two (bit0 n) :=
by dsimp [bit0]; apply_instance
@[hott] def is_at_least_two_bit1 (n : ℕ) [H : is_succ n] : is_at_least_two (bit1 n) :=
by dsimp [bit1, bit0]; apply_instance
/- some facts about iterate -/
@[hott] def iterate_succ {A : Type _} (f : A → A) (n : ℕ) (x : A) :
f^[succ n] x = f^[n] (f x) :=
begin induction n with n p, refl, exact ap f p end
@[hott] lemma iterate_sub {A : Type _} (f : A ≃ A) {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≥ m) (a : A) :
iterate f (n - m) a = iterate f n (iterate f⁻¹ᶠ m a) :=
begin
induction m with m p generalizing n h,
{ refl },
{ cases n with n, apply empty.elim, apply not_succ_le_zero _ h,
rwr [succ_sub_succ], refine p (le_of_succ_le_succ h) ⬝ _,
refine ap (f^[n]) _ ⬝ (iterate_succ _ _ _)⁻¹, exact (to_right_inv _ _)⁻¹ }
end
@[hott] def iterate_commute {A : Type _} {f g : A → A} (n : ℕ) (h : f ∘ g ~ g ∘ f) :
iterate f n ∘ g ~ g ∘ iterate f n :=
begin induction n with n IH, refl, exact λx, ap f (IH x) ⬝ h _ end
@[hott] def iterate_equiv {A : Type _} (f : A ≃ A) (n : ℕ) : A ≃ A :=
equiv.mk (iterate f n)
begin induction n with n IH, apply is_equiv_id, exactI is_equiv_compose f (iterate f n) end
@[hott] def iterate_inv {A : Type _} (f : A ≃ A) (n : ℕ) :
(iterate_equiv f n)⁻¹ᶠ ~ iterate f⁻¹ᶠ n :=
begin
induction n with n p; intro a,
refl,
exact p (f⁻¹ᶠ a) ⬝ (iterate_succ _ _ _)⁻¹
end
@[hott] def iterate_left_inv {A : Type _} (f : A ≃ A) (n : ℕ) (a : A) : f⁻¹ᵉ^[n] (f^[n] a) = a :=
(iterate_inv f n (f^[n] a))⁻¹ ⬝ to_left_inv (iterate_equiv f n) a
@[hott] def iterate_right_inv {A : Type _} (f : A ≃ A) (n : ℕ) (a : A) : f^[n] (f⁻¹ᵉ^[n] a) = a :=
ap (f^[n]) (iterate_inv f n a)⁻¹ ⬝ to_right_inv (iterate_equiv f n) a
end nat
end hott
|
a3d58bc691440f965ce923712c99e85c41e77075 | aa101d73b1a3173c7ec56de02b96baa8ca64c42e | /src/my_exercises/06_sub_sequences.lean | 1c9d9dfa182959adac2fe42b095dead310ce3349 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | gihanmarasingha/tutorials | b554d4d53866c493c4341dc13e914b01444e95a6 | 56617114ef0f9f7b808476faffd11e22e4380918 | refs/heads/master | 1,671,141,758,153 | 1,599,173,318,000 | 1,599,173,318,000 | 282,405,870 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,666,751,000 | 1,595,666,750,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,269 | lean | import tuto_lib
/-
This file continues the elementary study of limits of sequences.
It can be skipped if the previous file was too easy, it won't introduce
any new tactic or trick.
Remember useful lemmas:
abs_le (x y : ℝ) : |x| ≤ y ↔ -y ≤ x ∧ x ≤ y
abs_add (x y : ℝ) : |x + y| ≤ |x| + |y|
abs_sub (x y : ℝ) : |x - y| = |y - x|
ge_max_iff (p q r) : r ≥ max p q ↔ r ≥ p ∧ r ≥ q
le_max_left p q : p ≤ max p q
le_max_right p q : q ≤ max p q
and the definition:
def seq_limit (u : ℕ → ℝ) (l : ℝ) : Prop :=
∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, |u n - l| ≤ ε
You can also use a property proved in the previous file:
unique_limit : seq_limit u l → seq_limit u l' → l = l'
def extraction (φ : ℕ → ℕ) := ∀ n m, n < m → φ n < φ m
-/
variable { φ : ℕ → ℕ}
example (a b : ℕ) : a < b → a.succ ≤ b :=
begin
exact nat.succ_le_iff.mpr
end
/-
The next lemma is proved by an easy induction, but we haven't seen induction
in this tutorial. If you did the natural number game then you can delete
the proof below and try to reconstruct it.
-/
/-- An extraction is greater than id -/
-- I've written my own solution below. Massot's is simpler.
lemma id_le_extraction' : extraction φ → ∀ n, n ≤ φ n :=
begin
intros he n,
induction n with k hk,
linarith, -- base case
have : φ k < φ (k.succ) :=
he k k.succ _,
have : k < φ (k.succ) := by linarith,
exact nat.succ_le_of_lt this,
exact lt_add_one k,
end
/-- Extractions take arbitrarily large values for arbitrarily large
inputs. -/
-- 0039
lemma extraction_ge : extraction φ → ∀ N N', ∃ n ≥ N', φ n ≥ N :=
begin
intros he N N',
use (max N N'),
split, {
exact le_max_right _ _,
}, {
have : φ (max N N') ≥ max N N' :=
id_le_extraction' he (max N N'),
have : max N N' ≥ N := le_max_left _ _,
linarith,
}
end
/-- A real number `a` is a cluster point of a sequence `u`
if `u` has a subsequence converging to `a`.
def cluster_point (u : ℕ → ℝ) (a : ℝ) :=
∃ φ, extraction φ ∧ seq_limit (u ∘ φ) a
-/
variables {u : ℕ → ℝ} {a l : ℝ}
/-
In the exercise, we use `∃ n ≥ N, ...` which is the abbreviation of
`∃ n, n ≥ N ∧ ...`.
Lean can read this abbreviation, but displays it as the confusing:
`∃ (n : ℕ) (H : n ≥ N)`
One gets used to it. Alternatively, one can get rid of it using the lemma
exists_prop {p q : Prop} : (∃ (h : p), q) ↔ p ∧ q
-/
/-- If `a` is a cluster point of `u` then there are values of
`u` arbitrarily close to `a` for arbitrarily large input. -/
-- 0040
lemma near_cluster :
cluster_point u a → ∀ ε > 0, ∀ N, ∃ n ≥ N, |u n - a| ≤ ε :=
begin
intros hcp ε ε_pos N,
rcases hcp with ⟨φ, ⟨hexf,hseq⟩⟩,
rcases (hseq ε ε_pos) with ⟨N₀, hn⟩,
rcases (extraction_ge hexf N N₀) with ⟨m,⟨H,hphi⟩⟩,
use (φ m),
split, {
exact hphi,
}, {
specialize hn m,
exact hn H,
}
end
/-
The above exercice can be done in five lines.
Hint: you can use the anonymous constructor syntax when proving
existential statements.
-/
/-- If `u` tends to `l` then its subsequences tend to `l`. -/
-- 0041
lemma subseq_tendsto_of_tendsto' (h : seq_limit u l) (hφ : extraction φ) :
seq_limit (u ∘ φ) l :=
begin
intros ε ε_pos,
cases (h ε ε_pos) with N h2,
use N,
intros n hn,
apply h2,
linarith [id_le_extraction' hφ n],
end
/-- If `u` tends to `l` all its cluster points are equal to `l`. -/
-- 0042
/- I give two proofs. The first proof is quick and uses the results we've already proved. The second is longer! -/
lemma cluster_limit (hl : seq_limit u l) (ha : cluster_point u a) : a = l :=
begin
rcases ha with ⟨φ,⟨hφ, hφa⟩⟩,
have hφl : seq_limit (u ∘ φ) l :=
subseq_tendsto_of_tendsto' hl hφ,
exact unique_limit hφa hφl,
end
example (hl : seq_limit u l) (ha : cluster_point u a) : a = l :=
begin
apply eq_of_abs_sub_le_all,
intros ε ε_pos,
cases (hl (ε/2) (by linarith)) with N₁ hN₁,
rcases ha with ⟨φ,⟨hφ,hseqφ⟩⟩,
cases (hseqφ (ε/2) (by linarith)) with N₂ hN₂,
specialize hN₂ (max N₁ N₂),
specialize hN₁ (φ (max N₁ N₂)),
have hf : N₁ ≤ φ (max N₁ N₂) :=
calc N₁ ≤ max N₁ N₂ : le_max_left _ _
... ≤ φ (max N₁ N₂) : id_le_extraction' hφ _,
calc
|a - l| = |(a - u (φ (max N₁ N₂))) + (u (φ (max N₁ N₂)) -l )| : by ring
... ≤ |(a - u (φ (max N₁ N₂)))| + |(u (φ (max N₁ N₂)) -l )| : by simp [abs_add]
... = |u (φ (max N₁ N₂))- a| + |u (φ (max N₁ N₂)) -l| : by simp [abs_sub]
... ≤ ε/2 + |u (φ (max N₁ N₂)) -l| : by simp [hN₂ (le_max_right _ _)]
... ≤ ε/2 + ε/2 : by linarith [hN₁ hf]
... ≤ ε : by linarith,
end
/-- Cauchy_sequence sequence -/
def cauchy_sequence (u : ℕ → ℝ) := ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ p q, p ≥ N → q ≥ N → |u p - u q| ≤ ε
-- 0043
example : (∃ l, seq_limit u l) → cauchy_sequence u :=
begin
rintro ⟨l, hseql⟩,
intros ε ε_pos,
cases (hseql (ε/2) (by linarith)) with N hN,
use N,
intros p q hp hq,
calc |u p - u q| = |(u p - l) + (l - u q)| : by ring
... ≤ |u p - l| + |l - u q| : by apply abs_add
... = |u p - l| + |u q - l| : by simp [abs_sub]
... ≤ ε/2 + |u q - l| : by simp [hN p hp]
... ≤ ε/2 + ε/2 : by linarith [hN q hq]
... ≤ ε : by linarith,
end
/-
In the next exercise, you can reuse
near_cluster : cluster_point u a → ∀ ε > 0, ∀ N, ∃ n ≥ N, |u n - a| ≤ ε
-/
-- 0044
example (hu : cauchy_sequence u) (hl : cluster_point u l) : seq_limit u l :=
begin
intros ε ε_pos,
cases hu (ε/2) (by linarith) with N₁ hN₁,
rcases near_cluster hl (ε/2) (by linarith) N₁ with ⟨p,hpN₁,hp⟩,
use N₁,
intros n hn,
have : n ≥ N₁, linarith,
calc |u n - l| = |(u n - u p) + (u p - l)| : by ring
... ≤ |u n - u p| + |u p - l| : by simp [abs_add]
... ≤ ε/2 + |u p - l| : by simp [hN₁ n p (by linarith) hpN₁]
... ≤ ε/2 + ε/2: by linarith [hp]
... ≤ ε : by ring,
end |
77b03bddb7a0dcd146c52378c9c1940f360f5879 | a45212b1526d532e6e83c44ddca6a05795113ddc | /src/linear_algebra/linear_combination.lean | b0713950dbb8a5c99ac05057b7708ede0b747e0a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | fpvandoorn/mathlib | b21ab4068db079cbb8590b58fda9cc4bc1f35df4 | b3433a51ea8bc07c4159c1073838fc0ee9b8f227 | refs/heads/master | 1,624,791,089,608 | 1,556,715,231,000 | 1,556,715,231,000 | 165,722,980 | 5 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,552,657,455,000 | 1,547,494,646,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,134 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
The module `lc α β` of linear combinations over `β` (`α` is the scalar ring)
-/
import linear_algebra.basic
noncomputable theory
open classical function lattice
local attribute [instance] prop_decidable
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
/-- The type of linear coefficients, which are simply the finitely supported functions
from the module `β` to the scalar ring `α`. -/
@[reducible] def lc (α β) [ring α] [add_comm_group β] [module α β] : Type* := β →₀ α
namespace lc
variables [ring α] [add_comm_group β] [add_comm_group γ] [add_comm_group δ]
variables [module α β] [module α γ] [module α δ]
open submodule linear_map
instance : add_comm_group (lc α β) := finsupp.add_comm_group
instance : has_scalar α (lc α β) := finsupp.to_has_scalar
instance : module α (lc α β) := finsupp.to_module β α
variables (α)
def supported (s : set β) : submodule α (lc α β) :=
{ carrier := {l | ↑l.support ⊆ s},
zero := by simp,
add := λ l₁ l₂ h₁ h₂, set.subset.trans (finset.coe_subset.2 finsupp.support_add)
(by simpa using set.union_subset h₁ h₂),
smul := λ a l h, set.subset.trans (finset.coe_subset.2 finsupp.support_smul)
(by simpa using h) }
variables {α}
theorem mem_supported {s : set β} {l : lc α β} :
l ∈ supported α s ↔ ↑l.support ⊆ s := iff.rfl
theorem mem_supported' {s : set β} {l : lc α β} :
l ∈ supported α s ↔ ∀ x ∉ s, l x = 0 :=
by simp [mem_supported, set.subset_def, not_imp_comm]
theorem single_mem_supported {s : set β} (a : α) {b : β} (h : b ∈ s) :
finsupp.single b a ∈ supported α s :=
set.subset.trans finsupp.support_single_subset (set.singleton_subset_iff.2 h)
theorem supported_eq_span_single (s : set β) :
lc.supported α s = span α ((λ x, finsupp.single x (1:α)) '' s) :=
begin
refine (span_eq_of_le _ _ (le_def'.2 $ λ l hl, _)).symm,
{ rintro _ ⟨l, hl, rfl⟩, exact single_mem_supported _ hl },
{ rw ← l.sum_single,
refine sum_mem _ (λ x xl, _),
rw (by simp : finsupp.single x (l x) = l x • finsupp.single x 1),
exact smul_mem _ _ (subset_span ⟨_, hl xl, rfl⟩) }
end
variables (α)
def restrict_dom (s : set β) : lc α β →ₗ supported α s :=
linear_map.cod_restrict _
{ to_fun := finsupp.filter (∈ s),
add := λ l₁ l₂, finsupp.filter_add,
smul := λ a l, finsupp.filter_smul }
(λ l, mem_supported'.2 $ λ x, finsupp.filter_apply_neg (∈ s) l)
variables {α}
@[simp] theorem restrict_dom_apply (s : set β) (l : lc α β) :
↑((restrict_dom α s : lc α β →ₗ supported α s) l) = finsupp.filter (∈ s) l := rfl
theorem restrict_dom_comp_subtype (s : set β) :
(restrict_dom α s).comp (submodule.subtype _) = linear_map.id :=
by ext l; apply subtype.coe_ext.2; simp; ext a;
by_cases a ∈ s; simp [h]; exact (mem_supported'.1 l.2 _ h).symm
theorem range_restrict_dom (s : set β) : (restrict_dom α s).range = ⊤ :=
begin
have := linear_map.range_comp (submodule.subtype _) (restrict_dom α s),
rw [restrict_dom_comp_subtype, linear_map.range_id] at this,
exact eq_top_mono (submodule.map_mono le_top) this.symm
end
theorem supported_mono {s t : set β} (st : s ⊆ t) :
supported α s ≤ supported α t :=
λ l h, set.subset.trans h st
@[simp] theorem supported_empty : supported α (∅ : set β) = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 $ λ l h, (submodule.mem_bot α).2 $
by ext; simp [*, mem_supported'] at *
@[simp] theorem supported_univ : supported α (set.univ : set β) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 $ λ l _, set.subset_univ _
theorem supported_Union {ι : Type*} (s : ι → set β) :
supported α (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, supported α (s i) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm _ (supr_le $ λ i, supported_mono $ set.subset_Union _ _),
suffices : ((submodule.subtype _).comp (restrict_dom α (⋃ i, s i))).range ≤ ⨆ i, supported α (s i),
{ rwa [range_comp, range_restrict_dom, map_top, range_subtype] at this },
rw [range_le_iff_comap, eq_top_iff],
rintro l ⟨⟩, rw mem_coe,
apply finsupp.induction l, {exact zero_mem _},
refine λ x a l hl a0, add_mem _ _,
by_cases (∃ i, x ∈ s i); simp [h],
cases h with i hi,
exact le_supr (λ i, supported α (s i)) i (single_mem_supported _ hi)
end
theorem supported_union (s t : set β) :
supported α (s ∪ t) = supported α s ⊔ supported α t :=
by erw [set.union_eq_Union, supported_Union, supr_bool_eq]; refl
theorem supported_Inter {ι : Type*} (s : ι → set β) :
supported α (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, supported α (s i) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (le_infi $ λ i, supported_mono $ set.Inter_subset _ _) _,
simp [le_def, infi_coe, set.subset_def],
exact λ l, set.subset_Inter
end
def apply (x : β) : lc α β →ₗ α :=
⟨λ l, l x, λ _ _, finsupp.add_apply, λ _ _, finsupp.smul_apply⟩
@[simp] theorem apply_apply (x : β) (l : lc α β) :
(lc.apply x : lc α β →ₗ α) l = l x := rfl
protected def lsum (f : β → α →ₗ[α] γ) : lc α β →ₗ[α] γ :=
⟨λ d, d.sum (λ b, f b),
assume d₁ d₂, by simp [finsupp.sum_add_index],
assume a d, by simp [finsupp.sum_smul_index, finsupp.smul_sum,
-smul_eq_mul, smul_eq_mul.symm]⟩
@[simp] theorem lsum_apply (f : β → α →ₗ γ) (l : lc α β) :
(lc.lsum f : lc α β →ₗ γ) l = l.sum (λ b, f b) := rfl
section
variables (α β)
protected def total : lc α β →ₗ β := lc.lsum linear_map.id.smul_right
end
theorem total_apply (l : lc α β) :
lc.total α β l = l.sum (λ b a, a • b) := rfl
@[simp] theorem total_single (a : α) (x : β) :
lc.total α β (finsupp.single x a) = a • x :=
by simp [total_apply, finsupp.sum_single_index]
@[simp] theorem total_range : (lc.total α β).range = ⊤ :=
range_eq_top.2 $ λ x, ⟨finsupp.single x 1, by simp⟩
variables (α)
protected def map (f : β → γ) : lc α β →ₗ[α] lc α γ :=
{ to_fun := finsupp.map_domain f,
add := λ l₁ l₂, finsupp.map_domain_add,
smul := λ a l, finsupp.map_domain_smul _ _ }
variables {α}
@[simp] theorem map_apply (f : β → γ) (l : lc α β) :
(lc.map α f : _ →ₗ _) l = finsupp.map_domain f l := rfl
@[simp] theorem map_id : (lc.map α id : lc α β →ₗ[α] lc α β) = linear_map.id :=
linear_map.ext $ λ l, finsupp.map_domain_id
theorem map_comp (f : β → γ) (g : γ → δ) :
lc.map α (g ∘ f) = (lc.map α g).comp (lc.map α f) :=
linear_map.ext $ λ l, finsupp.map_domain_comp
theorem supported_comap_map (f : β → γ) (s : set γ) :
supported α (f ⁻¹' s) ≤ (supported α s).comap (lc.map α f) :=
λ l (hl : ↑l.support ⊆ f ⁻¹' s),
show ↑(finsupp.map_domain f l).support ⊆ s, begin
rw [← set.image_subset_iff, ← finset.coe_image] at hl,
exact set.subset.trans finsupp.map_domain_support hl
end
theorem map_supported (f : β → γ) (s : set β) :
(supported α s).map (lc.map α f) = supported α (f '' s) :=
begin
refine le_antisymm (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 $
le_trans (supported_mono $ set.subset_preimage_image _ _)
(supported_comap_map _ _)) _,
intros l hl, haveI : inhabited β := ⟨0⟩,
refine ⟨(lc.map α (inv_fun_on f s) : lc α γ →ₗ lc α β) l, λ x hx, _, _⟩,
{ rcases finset.mem_image.1 (finsupp.map_domain_support hx) with ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩,
exact inv_fun_on_mem (by simpa using hl hc) },
{ rw [← linear_map.comp_apply, ← map_comp],
refine (finsupp.map_domain_congr $ λ c hc, _).trans finsupp.map_domain_id,
exact inv_fun_on_eq (by simpa using hl hc) }
end
theorem map_disjoint_ker (f : β → γ) {s : set β}
(H : ∀ a b ∈ s, f a = f b → a = b) :
disjoint (supported α s) (lc.map α f).ker :=
begin
rintro l ⟨h₁, h₂⟩,
rw [mem_coe, mem_ker, map_apply, finsupp.map_domain] at h₂,
simp, ext x,
by_cases xs : x ∈ s,
{ have : finsupp.sum l (λ a, finsupp.single (f a)) (f x) = 0, {rw h₂, refl},
rw [finsupp.sum_apply, finsupp.sum, finset.sum_eq_single x] at this,
{ simpa [finsupp.single_apply] },
{ intros y hy xy, simp [mt (H _ _ (h₁ hy) xs) xy] },
{ simp {contextual := tt} } },
{ by_contra h, exact xs (h₁ $ finsupp.mem_support_iff.2 h) }
end
theorem map_total (f : β →ₗ[α] γ) :
(lc.total α γ).comp (lc.map α f) = f.comp (lc.total α β) :=
by ext; simp [total_apply, finsupp.sum_map_domain_index, add_smul]
end lc
namespace lc
variables [discrete_field α] [add_comm_group β] [vector_space α β]
instance : vector_space α (lc α β) := { .. lc.module }
end lc
section module
variables [ring α] [add_comm_group β] [add_comm_group γ] [add_comm_group δ]
variables [module α β] [module α γ] [module α δ]
variables {a b : α} {s t : set β} {x y : β}
include α
open submodule
theorem span_eq_map_lc : span α s = (lc.supported α s).map (lc.total α β) :=
begin
apply span_eq_of_le,
{ exact λ x hx, ⟨_, lc.single_mem_supported 1 hx, by simp⟩ },
{ refine map_le_iff_le_comap.2 (λ v hv, _),
have : ∀c, v c • c ∈ span α s,
{ intro c, by_cases c ∈ s,
{ exact smul_mem _ _ (subset_span h) },
{ simp [lc.mem_supported'.1 hv _ h] } },
refine sum_mem _ _, simp [this] }
end
theorem mem_span_iff_lc : x ∈ span α s ↔ ∃ l ∈ lc.supported α s, lc.total α β l = x :=
by rw span_eq_map_lc; simp
variables (α)
def lc.total_on (s : set β) : lc.supported α s →ₗ span α s :=
linear_map.cod_restrict _ ((lc.total α _).comp (submodule.subtype _)) $
λ ⟨l, hl⟩, mem_span_iff_lc.2 ⟨l, hl, rfl⟩
variables {α}
theorem lc.total_on_range (s : set β) : (lc.total_on α s).range = ⊤ :=
by rw [lc.total_on, linear_map.range, linear_map.map_cod_restrict, ← linear_map.range_le_iff_comap,
range_subtype, map_top, linear_map.range_comp, range_subtype]; exact le_of_eq span_eq_map_lc
lemma linear_eq_on {f g : β →ₗ[α] γ} (H : ∀x∈s, f x = g x) {x} (h : x ∈ span α s) : f x = g x :=
by apply span_induction h H; simp {contextual := tt}
end module
|
eab69b5e09c72e09466c1b701be7944739dfcfb3 | 28be2ab6091504b6ba250b367205fb94d50ab284 | /src/game/world8/level1.lean | 188671dcaac9d332f007003869b364904d7fcfd0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | postmasters/natural_number_game | 87304ac22e5e1c5ac2382d6e523d6914dd67a92d | 38a7adcdfdb18c49c87b37831736c8f15300d821 | refs/heads/master | 1,649,856,819,031 | 1,586,444,676,000 | 1,586,444,676,000 | 255,006,061 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,586,664,599,000 | 1,586,664,598,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,848 | lean | import mynat.definition -- hide
import mynat.add -- hide
import game.world2.level6 -- hide
namespace mynat -- hide
/- Axiom : succ_inj {a b : mynat} :
succ(a) = succ(b) → a = b
-/
/-
# Advanced Addition World
## Level 1: `succ_inj`. A function.
Peano's original collection of axioms for the natural numbers contained two further
assumptions, which have not yet been mentioned in the game:
```
succ_inj {a b : mynat} :
succ(a) = succ(b) → a = b
zero_ne_succ (a : mynat) :
zero ≠ succ(a)
```
The reason they have not been used yet is that they are both implications,
that is,
of the form $P\implies Q$. This is clear for `succ_inj a b`, which
says that for all $a$ and $b$ we have $succ(a)=succ(b)\implies a=b$.
For `zero_ne_succ` the trick is that $X\ne Y$ is *defined to mean*
$X = Y\implies{\tt false}$. If you have played through Proposition world,
you now have the required Lean skills (i.e., you know the required
tactics) to work with these implications.
Let's finally learn how to use `succ_inj`. You should know a couple
of ways to prove the below -- one directly using an `exact`, and one which uses an
`apply` first.
-/
/- Theorem : no-side-bar
For all naturals $a$ and $b$, if we assume $succ(a)=succ(b)$, then we can
deduce $a=b$.
-/
theorem succ_inj' {a b : mynat} (hs : succ(a) = succ(b)) : a = b :=
begin [nat_num_game]
exact succ_inj(hs),
end
/-
## Important thing.
You can rewrite proofs of *equalities*. If `h : A = B` then `rw h` changes `A`s to `B`s.
But you *cannot rewrite proofs of implications*. `rw succ_inj` will *never work*
because `succ_inj` isn't of the form $A = B$, it's of the form $A\implies B$. This is one
of the most common mistakes I see from beginners. $\implies$ and $=$ are *two different things*
and you need to be clear about which one you are using.
-/
end mynat -- hide
|
93457561384de60cfe018c7ac694a0c8aca2942b | 9d2e3d5a2e2342a283affd97eead310c3b528a24 | /src/solutions/thursday/afternoon/category_theory/exercise3.lean | 8a631a12299dd2c623a79068ecdbe350b3beaba0 | [] | permissive | Vtec234/lftcm2020 | ad2610ab614beefe44acc5622bb4a7fff9a5ea46 | bbbd4c8162f8c2ef602300ab8fdeca231886375d | refs/heads/master | 1,668,808,098,623 | 1,594,989,081,000 | 1,594,990,079,000 | 280,423,039 | 0 | 0 | MIT | 1,594,990,209,000 | 1,594,990,209,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,142 | lean | import for_mathlib.category_theory -- This imports some simp lemmas that I realised belong in mathlib while writing this exercise.
open category_theory
variables {C : Type*} [category C]
variables {D : Type*} [category D]
lemma equiv_reflects_mono {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (e : C ≌ D)
(hef : mono (e.functor.map f)) : mono f :=
-- Hint: when `e : C ≌ D`, `e.functor.map_injective` says
-- `∀ f g, e.functor.map f = e.functor.map g → f = g`
-- Hint: use `cancel_mono`.
-- sorry
begin
tidy,
apply e.functor.map_injective,
apply (cancel_mono (e.functor.map f)).1,
apply e.inverse.map_injective,
simp,
assumption
end
-- sorry
lemma equiv_preserves_mono {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [mono f] (e : C ≌ D) :
mono (e.functor.map f) :=
-- Hint: if `w : f = g`, to obtain `F.map f = F.map G`,
-- you can use `have w' := congr_arg (λ k, F.map k) w`.
-- sorry
begin
tidy,
replace w := congr_arg (λ k, e.inverse.map k) w,
simp at w,
simp only [←category.assoc, cancel_mono] at w,
simp at w,
exact w,
end
-- sorry
/-!
There are some further hints in
`src/hints/thursday/afternoon/category_theory/exercise3/`
-/
|
d8f1fa7ba250005c19b7858af50192e6eeed83de | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/order/filter/curry.lean | 49208acf1904c1199adf15ed064fa132338638d0 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,779 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kevin H. Wilson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin H. Wilson
-/
import order.filter.prod
/-!
# Curried Filters
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
This file provides an operation (`filter.curry`) on filters which provides the equivalence
`∀ᶠ a in l, ∀ᶠ b in l', p (a, b) ↔ ∀ᶠ c in (l.curry l'), p c` (see `filter.eventually_curry_iff`).
To understand when this operation might arise, it is helpful to think of `∀ᶠ` as a combination of
the quantifiers `∃ ∀`. For instance, `∀ᶠ n in at_top, p n ↔ ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, p n`. A curried filter
yields the quantifier order `∃ ∀ ∃ ∀`. For instance,
`∀ᶠ n in at_top.curry at_top, p n ↔ ∃ M, ∀ m ≥ M, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, p (m, n)`.
This is different from a product filter, which instead yields a quantifier order `∃ ∃ ∀ ∀`. For
instance, `∀ᶠ n in at_top ×ᶠ at_top, p n ↔ ∃ M, ∃ N, ∀ m ≥ M, ∀ n ≥ N, p (m, n)`. This makes it
clear that if something eventually occurs on the product filter, it eventually occurs on the curried
filter (see `filter.curry_le_prod` and `filter.eventually.curry`), but the converse is not true.
Another way to think about the curried versus the product filter is that tending to some limit on
the product filter is a version of uniform convergence (see `tendsto_prod_filter_iff`) whereas
tending to some limit on a curried filter is just iterated limits (see `tendsto.curry`).
## Main definitions
* `filter.curry`: A binary operation on filters which represents iterated limits
## Main statements
* `filter.eventually_curry_iff`: An alternative definition of a curried filter
* `filter.curry_le_prod`: Something that is eventually true on the a product filter is eventually
true on the curried filter
## Tags
uniform convergence, curried filters, product filters
-/
namespace filter
variables {α β γ : Type*}
/-- This filter is characterized by `filter.eventually_curry_iff`:
`(∀ᶠ (x : α × β) in f.curry g, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ (x : α) in f, ∀ᶠ (y : β) in g, p (x, y)`. Useful
in adding quantifiers to the middle of `tendsto`s. See
`has_fderiv_at_of_tendsto_uniformly_on_filter`. -/
def curry (f : filter α) (g : filter β) : filter (α × β) :=
{ sets := { s | ∀ᶠ (a : α) in f, ∀ᶠ (b : β) in g, (a, b) ∈ s },
univ_sets := (by simp only [set.mem_set_of_eq, set.mem_univ, eventually_true]),
sets_of_superset := begin
intros x y hx hxy,
simp only [set.mem_set_of_eq] at hx ⊢,
exact hx.mono (λ a ha, ha.mono(λ b hb, set.mem_of_subset_of_mem hxy hb)),
end,
inter_sets := begin
intros x y hx hy,
simp only [set.mem_set_of_eq, set.mem_inter_iff] at hx hy ⊢,
exact (hx.and hy).mono (λ a ha, (ha.1.and ha.2).mono (λ b hb, hb)),
end, }
lemma eventually_curry_iff {f : filter α} {g : filter β} {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ (x : α × β) in f.curry g, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ (x : α) in f, ∀ᶠ (y : β) in g, p (x, y) :=
iff.rfl
lemma curry_le_prod {f : filter α} {g : filter β} :
f.curry g ≤ f.prod g :=
begin
intros u hu,
rw ←eventually_mem_set at hu ⊢,
rw eventually_curry_iff,
exact hu.curry,
end
lemma tendsto.curry {f : α → β → γ} {la : filter α} {lb : filter β} {lc : filter γ} :
(∀ᶠ a in la, tendsto (λ b : β, f a b) lb lc) → tendsto ↿f (la.curry lb) lc :=
begin
intros h,
rw tendsto_def,
simp only [curry, filter.mem_mk, set.mem_set_of_eq, set.mem_preimage],
simp_rw tendsto_def at h,
refine (λ s hs, h.mono (λ a ha, eventually_iff.mpr _)),
simpa [function.has_uncurry.uncurry, set.preimage] using ha s hs,
end
end filter
|
d39c7e5a797bdf85e23ca030b00b7487f2c3ce1a | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/interactive/1525.lean | 11c4a4718b3480cd5c291ba644476050e0326cda | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 69 | lean | -- should not produce any server panics
structure Foo where
/--/-/
|
5187db6ff33c5f889f6380da6e09a32269883a08 | 75db7e3219bba2fbf41bf5b905f34fcb3c6ca3f2 | /library/algebra/ring_power.lean | dbf2bf56e2e5178f8b892d024877659c807ad21a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jroesch/lean | 30ef0860fa905d35b9ad6f76de1a4f65c9af6871 | 3de4ec1a6ce9a960feb2a48eeea8b53246fa34f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,586,090,835,348 | 1,455,142,203,000 | 1,455,142,277,000 | 51,536,958 | 1 | 0 | null | 1,455,215,811,000 | 1,455,215,811,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 4,864 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2015 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Jeremy Avigad
Properties of the power operation in various structures, including ordered rings and fields.
-/
import .group_power .ordered_field
open nat
variable {A : Type}
section semiring
variable [s : semiring A]
include s
definition semiring_has_pow_nat [reducible] [instance] : has_pow_nat A :=
monoid_has_pow_nat
theorem zero_pow {m : ℕ} (mpos : m > 0) : 0^m = (0 : A) :=
have h₁ : ∀ m : nat, (0 : A)^(succ m) = (0 : A),
begin
intro m, induction m,
krewrite pow_one,
apply zero_mul
end,
obtain m' (h₂ : m = succ m'), from exists_eq_succ_of_pos mpos,
show 0^m = 0, by rewrite h₂; apply h₁
end semiring
section integral_domain
variable [s : integral_domain A]
include s
definition integral_domain_has_pow_nat [reducible] [instance] : has_pow_nat A :=
monoid_has_pow_nat
theorem eq_zero_of_pow_eq_zero {a : A} {m : ℕ} (H : a^m = 0) : a = 0 :=
or.elim (eq_zero_or_pos m)
(suppose m = 0,
by rewrite [`m = 0` at H, pow_zero at H]; apply absurd H (ne.symm zero_ne_one))
(suppose m > 0,
have h₁ : ∀ m, a^succ m = 0 → a = 0,
begin
intro m,
induction m with m ih,
{krewrite pow_one; intros; assumption},
rewrite pow_succ,
intro H,
cases eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero H with h₃ h₄,
assumption,
exact ih h₄
end,
obtain m' (h₂ : m = succ m'), from exists_eq_succ_of_pos `m > 0`,
show a = 0, by rewrite h₂ at H; apply h₁ m' H)
theorem pow_ne_zero_of_ne_zero {a : A} {m : ℕ} (H : a ≠ 0) : a^m ≠ 0 :=
assume H', H (eq_zero_of_pow_eq_zero H')
end integral_domain
section division_ring
variable [s : division_ring A]
include s
theorem division_ring.pow_ne_zero_of_ne_zero {a : A} {m : ℕ} (H : a ≠ 0) : a^m ≠ 0 :=
or.elim (eq_zero_or_pos m)
(suppose m = 0,
by rewrite [`m = 0`, pow_zero]; exact (ne.symm zero_ne_one))
(suppose m > 0,
have h₁ : ∀ m, a^succ m ≠ 0,
begin
intro m,
induction m with m ih,
{ krewrite pow_one; assumption },
rewrite pow_succ,
apply division_ring.mul_ne_zero H ih
end,
obtain m' (h₂ : m = succ m'), from exists_eq_succ_of_pos `m > 0`,
show a^m ≠ 0, by rewrite h₂; apply h₁ m')
end division_ring
section linear_ordered_semiring
variable [s : linear_ordered_semiring A]
include s
theorem pow_pos_of_pos {x : A} (i : ℕ) (H : x > 0) : x^i > 0 :=
begin
induction i with [j, ih],
{show (1 : A) > 0, from zero_lt_one},
{show x^(succ j) > 0, from mul_pos H ih}
end
theorem pow_nonneg_of_nonneg {x : A} (i : ℕ) (H : x ≥ 0) : x^i ≥ 0 :=
begin
induction i with j ih,
{show (1 : A) ≥ 0, from le_of_lt zero_lt_one},
{show x^(succ j) ≥ 0, from mul_nonneg H ih}
end
theorem pow_le_pow_of_le {x y : A} (i : ℕ) (H₁ : 0 ≤ x) (H₂ : x ≤ y) : x^i ≤ y^i :=
begin
induction i with i ih,
{rewrite *pow_zero, apply le.refl},
rewrite *pow_succ,
have H : 0 ≤ x^i, from pow_nonneg_of_nonneg i H₁,
apply mul_le_mul H₂ ih H (le.trans H₁ H₂)
end
theorem pow_ge_one {x : A} (i : ℕ) (xge1 : x ≥ 1) : x^i ≥ 1 :=
assert H : x^i ≥ 1^i, from pow_le_pow_of_le i (le_of_lt zero_lt_one) xge1,
by rewrite one_pow at H; exact H
theorem pow_gt_one {x : A} {i : ℕ} (xgt1 : x > 1) (ipos : i > 0) : x^i > 1 :=
assert xpos : x > 0, from lt.trans zero_lt_one xgt1,
begin
induction i with [i, ih],
{exfalso, exact !lt.irrefl ipos},
have xige1 : x^i ≥ 1, from pow_ge_one _ (le_of_lt xgt1),
rewrite [pow_succ, -mul_one 1],
apply mul_lt_mul xgt1 xige1 zero_lt_one,
apply le_of_lt xpos
end
end linear_ordered_semiring
section decidable_linear_ordered_comm_ring
variable [s : decidable_linear_ordered_comm_ring A]
include s
definition decidable_linear_ordered_comm_ring_has_pow_nat [reducible] [instance] : has_pow_nat A :=
monoid_has_pow_nat
theorem abs_pow (a : A) (n : ℕ) : abs (a^n) = abs a^n :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
krewrite [*pow_zero, (abs_of_nonneg zero_le_one : abs (1 : A) = 1)],
rewrite [*pow_succ, abs_mul, ih]
end
end decidable_linear_ordered_comm_ring
section field
variable [s : field A]
include s
theorem field.div_pow (a : A) {b : A} {n : ℕ} (bnz : b ≠ 0) : (a / b)^n = a^n / b^n :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
krewrite [*pow_zero, div_one],
have bnnz : b^n ≠ 0, from division_ring.pow_ne_zero_of_ne_zero bnz,
rewrite [*pow_succ, ih, !field.div_mul_div bnz bnnz]
end
end field
section discrete_field
variable [s : discrete_field A]
include s
theorem div_pow (a : A) {b : A} {n : ℕ} : (a / b)^n = a^n / b^n :=
begin
induction n with n ih,
krewrite [*pow_zero, div_one],
rewrite [*pow_succ, ih, div_mul_div]
end
end discrete_field
|
bc28ae0c18f11d1a5807286cccee463d8efaf911 | 947b78d97130d56365ae2ec264df196ce769371a | /src/Lean/Syntax.lean | aea9b543b9ecf4a6e7fd61228df3b4dfcfdb34ff | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | shyamalschandra/lean4 | 27044812be8698f0c79147615b1d5090b9f4b037 | 6e7a883b21eaf62831e8111b251dc9b18f40e604 | refs/heads/master | 1,671,417,126,371 | 1,601,859,995,000 | 1,601,860,020,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 15,686 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Sebastian Ullrich, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Lean.Data.Name
import Lean.Data.Format
namespace Lean
namespace SourceInfo
def updateTrailing (info : SourceInfo) (trailing : Option Substring) : SourceInfo :=
{ info with trailing := trailing }
end SourceInfo
/- Syntax AST -/
def Syntax.isMissing : Syntax → Bool
| Syntax.missing => true
| _ => false
-- quotation node kinds are formed from a unique quotation name plus "quot"
def Syntax.isQuot : Syntax → Bool
| Syntax.node (Name.str _ "quot" _) _ => true
| _ => false
-- antiquotation node kinds are formed from the original node kind (if any) plus "antiquot"
def Syntax.isAntiquot : Syntax → Bool
| Syntax.node (Name.str _ "antiquot" _) _ => true
| _ => false
inductive IsNode : Syntax → Prop
| mk (kind : SyntaxNodeKind) (args : Array Syntax) : IsNode (Syntax.node kind args)
def SyntaxNode : Type := {s : Syntax // IsNode s }
def unreachIsNodeMissing {β} (h : IsNode Syntax.missing) : β := False.elim (nomatch h)
def unreachIsNodeAtom {β} {info val} (h : IsNode (Syntax.atom info val)) : β := False.elim (nomatch h)
def unreachIsNodeIdent {β info rawVal val preresolved} (h : IsNode (Syntax.ident info rawVal val preresolved)) : β := False.elim (nomatch h)
namespace SyntaxNode
@[inline] def getKind (n : SyntaxNode) : SyntaxNodeKind :=
match n with
| ⟨Syntax.node k args, _⟩ => k
| ⟨Syntax.missing, h⟩ => unreachIsNodeMissing h
| ⟨Syntax.atom _ _, h⟩ => unreachIsNodeAtom h
| ⟨Syntax.ident _ _ _ _, h⟩ => unreachIsNodeIdent h
@[inline] def withArgs {β} (n : SyntaxNode) (fn : Array Syntax → β) : β :=
match n with
| ⟨Syntax.node _ args, _⟩ => fn args
| ⟨Syntax.missing, h⟩ => unreachIsNodeMissing h
| ⟨Syntax.atom _ _, h⟩ => unreachIsNodeAtom h
| ⟨Syntax.ident _ _ _ _, h⟩ => unreachIsNodeIdent h
@[inline] def getNumArgs (n : SyntaxNode) : Nat :=
withArgs n $ fun args => args.size
@[inline] def getArg (n : SyntaxNode) (i : Nat) : Syntax :=
withArgs n $ fun args => args.get! i
@[inline] def getArgs (n : SyntaxNode) : Array Syntax :=
withArgs n $ fun args => args
@[inline] def modifyArgs (n : SyntaxNode) (fn : Array Syntax → Array Syntax) : Syntax :=
match n with
| ⟨Syntax.node kind args, _⟩ => Syntax.node kind (fn args)
| ⟨Syntax.missing, h⟩ => unreachIsNodeMissing h
| ⟨Syntax.atom _ _, h⟩ => unreachIsNodeAtom h
| ⟨Syntax.ident _ _ _ _, h⟩ => unreachIsNodeIdent h
end SyntaxNode
namespace Syntax
def getAtomVal! : Syntax → String
| atom _ val => val
| _ => panic! "getAtomVal!: not an atom"
def setAtomVal : Syntax → String → Syntax
| atom info _, v => (atom info v)
| stx, _ => stx
@[inline] def ifNode {β} (stx : Syntax) (hyes : SyntaxNode → β) (hno : Unit → β) : β :=
match stx with
| Syntax.node k args => hyes ⟨Syntax.node k args, IsNode.mk k args⟩
| _ => hno ()
@[inline] def ifNodeKind {β} (stx : Syntax) (kind : SyntaxNodeKind) (hyes : SyntaxNode → β) (hno : Unit → β) : β :=
match stx with
| Syntax.node k args => if k == kind then hyes ⟨Syntax.node k args, IsNode.mk k args⟩ else hno ()
| _ => hno ()
def asNode : Syntax → SyntaxNode
| Syntax.node kind args => ⟨Syntax.node kind args, IsNode.mk kind args⟩
| _ => ⟨Syntax.node nullKind #[], IsNode.mk nullKind #[]⟩
def getNumArgs (stx : Syntax) : Nat :=
stx.asNode.getNumArgs
def setArgs (stx : Syntax) (args : Array Syntax) : Syntax :=
match stx with
| node k _ => node k args
| stx => stx
@[inline] def modifyArgs (stx : Syntax) (fn : Array Syntax → Array Syntax) : Syntax :=
match stx with
| node k args => node k (fn args)
| stx => stx
def setArg (stx : Syntax) (i : Nat) (arg : Syntax) : Syntax :=
match stx with
| node k args => node k (args.set! i arg)
| stx => stx
@[inline] def modifyArg (stx : Syntax) (i : Nat) (fn : Syntax → Syntax) : Syntax :=
match stx with
| node k args => node k (args.modify i fn)
| stx => stx
def getIdAt (stx : Syntax) (i : Nat) : Name :=
(stx.getArg i).getId
@[specialize] partial def replaceM {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (fn : Syntax → m (Option Syntax)) : Syntax → m (Syntax)
| stx@(node kind args) => do
o ← fn stx;
match o with
| some stx => pure stx
| none => do args ← args.mapM replaceM; pure (node kind args)
| stx => do o ← fn stx; pure $ o.getD stx
@[specialize] partial def rewriteBottomUpM {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] (fn : Syntax → m (Syntax)) : Syntax → m (Syntax)
| node kind args => do
args ← args.mapM rewriteBottomUpM;
fn (node kind args)
| stx => fn stx
@[inline] def rewriteBottomUp (fn : Syntax → Syntax) (stx : Syntax) : Syntax :=
Id.run $ stx.rewriteBottomUpM fn
private def updateInfo : SourceInfo → String.Pos → SourceInfo
| {leading := some {str := s, startPos := _, stopPos := _}, pos := some pos, trailing := trailing}, last =>
{leading := some {str := s, startPos := last, stopPos := pos}, pos := some pos, trailing := trailing}
| info, _ => info
/- Remark: the State `String.Pos` is the `SourceInfo.trailing.stopPos` of the previous token,
or the beginning of the String. -/
@[inline]
private def updateLeadingAux : Syntax → StateM String.Pos (Option Syntax)
| atom info@{trailing := some trail, ..} val => do
last ← get;
set trail.stopPos;
let newInfo := updateInfo info last;
pure $ some (atom newInfo val)
| ident info@{trailing := some trail, ..} rawVal val pre => do
last ← get;
set trail.stopPos;
let newInfo := updateInfo info last;
pure $ some (ident newInfo rawVal val pre)
| _ => pure none
/-- Set `SourceInfo.leading` according to the trailing stop of the preceding token.
The Result is a round-tripping Syntax tree IF, in the input Syntax tree,
* all leading stops, atom contents, and trailing starts are correct
* trailing stops are between the trailing start and the next leading stop.
Remark: after parsing all `SourceInfo.leading` fields are Empty.
The Syntax argument is the output produced by the Parser for `source`.
This Function "fixes" the `source.leanding` field.
Note that, the `SourceInfo.trailing` fields are correct.
The implementation of this Function relies on this property. -/
def updateLeading : Syntax → Syntax :=
fun stx => (replaceM updateLeadingAux stx).run' 0
partial def updateTrailing (trailing : Option Substring) : Syntax → Syntax
| Syntax.atom info val => Syntax.atom (info.updateTrailing trailing) val
| Syntax.ident info rawVal val pre => Syntax.ident (info.updateTrailing trailing) rawVal val pre
| n@(Syntax.node k args) =>
if args.size == 0 then n
else
let i := args.size - 1;
let last := updateTrailing (args.get! i);
let args := args.set! i last;
Syntax.node k args
| s => s
def getPos (stx : Syntax) : Option String.Pos :=
stx.getHeadInfo >>= SourceInfo.pos
partial def getTailWithPos : Syntax → Option Syntax
| stx@(atom { pos := some _, .. } _) => some stx
| stx@(ident { pos := some _, .. } _ _ _) => some stx
| node _ args => args.findSomeRev? getTailWithPos
| _ => none
partial def getTailInfo : Syntax → Option SourceInfo
| atom info _ => info
| ident info _ _ _ => info
| node _ args => args.findSomeRev? getTailInfo
| _ => none
@[specialize] private partial def updateLast {α} [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) (f : α → Option α) : Nat → Option (Array α)
| i =>
if i == 0 then none
else
let i := i - 1;
let v := a.get! i;
match f v with
| some v => some $ a.set! i v
| none => updateLast i
partial def setTailInfoAux (info : SourceInfo) : Syntax → Option Syntax
| atom _ val => some $ atom info val
| ident _ rawVal val pre => some $ ident info rawVal val pre
| node k args =>
match updateLast args setTailInfoAux args.size with
| some args => some $ node k args
| none => none
| stx => none
def setTailInfo (stx : Syntax) (info : SourceInfo) : Syntax :=
match setTailInfoAux info stx with
| some stx => stx
| none => stx
def unsetTrailing (stx : Syntax) : Syntax :=
match stx.getTailInfo with
| none => stx
| some info => stx.setTailInfo { info with trailing := none }
@[specialize] private partial def updateFirst {α} [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) (f : α → Option α) : Nat → Option (Array α)
| i =>
if h : i < a.size then
let v := a.get ⟨i, h⟩;
match f v with
| some v => some $ a.set ⟨i, h⟩ v
| none => updateFirst (i+1)
else
none
partial def setHeadInfoAux (info : SourceInfo) : Syntax → Option Syntax
| atom _ val => some $ atom info val
| ident _ rawVal val pre => some $ ident info rawVal val pre
| node k args =>
match updateFirst args setHeadInfoAux 0 with
| some args => some $ node k args
| noxne => none
| stx => none
def setHeadInfo (stx : Syntax) (info : SourceInfo) : Syntax :=
match setHeadInfoAux info stx with
| some stx => stx
| none => stx
def setInfo (info : SourceInfo) : Syntax → Syntax
| atom _ val => atom info val
| ident _ rawVal val pre => ident info rawVal val pre
| stx => stx
partial def replaceInfo (info : SourceInfo) : Syntax → Syntax
| node k args => node k $ args.map replaceInfo
| stx => setInfo info stx
def copyInfo (s : Syntax) (source : Syntax) : Syntax :=
match source.getHeadInfo with
| none => s
| some info => s.setHeadInfo info
private def reprintLeaf (info : SourceInfo) (val : String) : String :=
-- no source info => add gracious amounts of whitespace to definitely separate tokens
-- Note that the proper pretty printer does not use this function.
-- The parser as well always produces source info, so round-tripping is still
-- guaranteed.
(Substring.toString <$> info.leading).getD " " ++ val ++ (Substring.toString <$> info.trailing).getD " "
partial def reprint : Syntax → Option String
| atom info val => reprintLeaf info val
| ident info rawVal _ _ => reprintLeaf info rawVal.toString
| node kind args =>
if kind == choiceKind then
if args.size == 0 then failure
else do
s ← reprint (args.get! 0);
args.foldlFromM (fun s stx => do s' ← reprint stx; guard (s == s'); pure s) s 1
else args.foldlM (fun r stx => do s ← reprint stx; pure $ r ++ s) ""
| _ => ""
open Lean.Format
private def formatInfo (showInfo : Bool) (info : SourceInfo) (f : Format) : Format :=
if showInfo then
(match info.leading with some ss => repr ss.toString ++ ":" | _ => "") ++
f ++
(match info.pos with some pos => ":" ++ toString info.pos | _ => "") ++
(match info.trailing with some ss => ":" ++ repr ss.toString | _ => "")
else f
partial def formatStxAux (maxDepth : Option Nat) (showInfo : Bool) : Nat → Syntax → Format
| _, atom info val => formatInfo showInfo info $ format (repr val)
| _, ident info _ val pre => formatInfo showInfo info $ format "`" ++ format val
| _, missing => "<missing>"
| depth, node kind args =>
let depth := depth + 1;
if kind == nullKind then
sbracket $
if args.size > 0 && depth > maxDepth.getD depth then
".."
else
joinSep (args.toList.map (formatStxAux depth)) line
else
let shorterName := kind.replacePrefix `Lean.Parser Name.anonymous;
let header := format shorterName;
let body : List Format :=
if args.size > 0 && depth > maxDepth.getD depth then [".."] else args.toList.map (formatStxAux depth);
paren $ joinSep (header :: body) line
def formatStx (stx : Syntax) (maxDepth : Option Nat := none) (showInfo := false) : Format :=
formatStxAux maxDepth showInfo 0 stx
instance : HasFormat (Syntax) := ⟨formatStx⟩
instance : HasToString (Syntax) := ⟨toString ∘ format⟩
partial def structEq : Syntax → Syntax → Bool
| Syntax.missing, Syntax.missing => true
| Syntax.node k args, Syntax.node k' args' => k == k' && args.isEqv args' structEq
| Syntax.atom _ val, Syntax.atom _ val' => val == val'
| Syntax.ident _ rawVal val preresolved, Syntax.ident _ rawVal' val' preresolved' => rawVal == rawVal' && val == val' && preresolved == preresolved'
| _, _ => false
instance structHasBeq : HasBeq Lean.Syntax := ⟨structEq⟩
/--
Represents a cursor into a syntax tree that can be read, written, and advanced down/up/left/right.
Indices are allowed to be out-of-bound, in which case `cur` is `Syntax.missing`.
If the `Traverser` is used linearly, updates are linear in the `Syntax` object as well.
-/
structure Traverser :=
(cur : Syntax)
(parents : Array Syntax)
(idxs : Array Nat)
namespace Traverser
def fromSyntax (stx : Syntax) : Traverser :=
⟨stx, #[], #[]⟩
def setCur (t : Traverser) (stx : Syntax) : Traverser :=
{ t with cur := stx }
/-- Advance to the `idx`-th child of the current node. -/
def down (t : Traverser) (idx : Nat) : Traverser :=
if idx < t.cur.getNumArgs then
{ cur := t.cur.getArg idx, parents := t.parents.push $ t.cur.setArg idx (arbitrary _), idxs := t.idxs.push idx }
else
{ cur := Syntax.missing, parents := t.parents.push t.cur, idxs := t.idxs.push idx }
/-- Advance to the parent of the current node, if any. -/
def up (t : Traverser) : Traverser :=
if t.parents.size > 0 then
let cur := if t.idxs.back < t.parents.back.getNumArgs then t.parents.back.setArg t.idxs.back t.cur else t.parents.back;
{ cur := cur, parents := t.parents.pop, idxs := t.idxs.pop }
else t
/-- Advance to the left sibling of the current node, if any. -/
def left (t : Traverser) : Traverser :=
if t.parents.size > 0 then
t.up.down (t.idxs.back - 1)
else t
/-- Advance to the right sibling of the current node, if any. -/
def right (t : Traverser) : Traverser :=
if t.parents.size > 0 then
t.up.down (t.idxs.back + 1)
else t
end Traverser
/-- Monad class that gives read/write access to a `Traverser`. -/
class MonadTraverser (m : Type → Type) :=
(st : MonadState Traverser m)
namespace MonadTraverser
variables {m : Type → Type} [Monad m] [t : MonadTraverser m]
def getCur : m Syntax := Traverser.cur <$> t.st.get
def setCur (stx : Syntax) : m Unit := @modify _ _ t.st (fun t => t.setCur stx)
def goDown (idx : Nat) : m Unit := @modify _ _ t.st (fun t => t.down idx)
def goUp : m Unit := @modify _ _ t.st (fun t => t.up)
def goLeft : m Unit := @modify _ _ t.st (fun t => t.left)
def goRight : m Unit := @modify _ _ t.st (fun t => t.right)
def getIdx : m Nat := do
st ← t.st.get;
pure st.idxs.back
end MonadTraverser
end Syntax
namespace SyntaxNode
@[inline] def getIdAt (n : SyntaxNode) (i : Nat) : Name :=
(n.getArg i).getId
end SyntaxNode
/- Helper functions for creating Syntax objects using C++ -/
@[export lean_mk_syntax_atom]
def mkSimpleAtom (val : String) : Syntax :=
Syntax.atom {} val
@[export lean_mk_syntax_list]
def mkListNode (args : Array Syntax) : Syntax :=
Syntax.node nullKind args
def mkAtom (val : String) : Syntax :=
Syntax.atom {} val
@[inline] def mkNode (k : SyntaxNodeKind) (args : Array Syntax) : Syntax :=
Syntax.node k args
@[export lean_mk_syntax_str_lit]
def mkStxStrLitAux (val : String) : Syntax :=
mkStxStrLit val
@[export lean_mk_syntax_num_lit]
def mkStxNumLitAux (val : Nat) : Syntax :=
mkStxNumLit (toString val)
end Lean
|
2a1bd1d98a76381709c68344a8c05044941cf706 | 2eab05920d6eeb06665e1a6df77b3157354316ad | /src/analysis/specific_limits.lean | beba708cba4731a01afd955b757b286aebf8ab95 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ayush1801/mathlib | 78949b9f789f488148142221606bf15c02b960d2 | ce164e28f262acbb3de6281b3b03660a9f744e3c | refs/heads/master | 1,692,886,907,941 | 1,635,270,866,000 | 1,635,270,866,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 47,624 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import algebra.geom_sum
import analysis.asymptotics.asymptotics
import order.filter.archimedean
import order.iterate
import topology.instances.ennreal
/-!
# A collection of specific limit computations
-/
noncomputable theory
open classical set function filter finset metric asymptotics
open_locale classical topological_space nat big_operators uniformity nnreal ennreal
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {ι : Type*}
lemma tendsto_norm_at_top_at_top : tendsto (norm : ℝ → ℝ) at_top at_top :=
tendsto_abs_at_top_at_top
lemma summable_of_absolute_convergence_real {f : ℕ → ℝ} :
(∃r, tendsto (λn, (∑ i in range n, |f i|)) at_top (𝓝 r)) → summable f
| ⟨r, hr⟩ :=
begin
refine summable_of_summable_norm ⟨r, (has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_nonneg _ _).2 _⟩,
exact assume i, norm_nonneg _,
simpa only using hr
end
lemma tendsto_inverse_at_top_nhds_0_nat : tendsto (λ n : ℕ, (n : ℝ)⁻¹) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_inv_at_top_zero.comp tendsto_coe_nat_at_top_at_top
lemma tendsto_const_div_at_top_nhds_0_nat (C : ℝ) : tendsto (λ n : ℕ, C / n) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
by simpa only [mul_zero] using tendsto_const_nhds.mul tendsto_inverse_at_top_nhds_0_nat
lemma nnreal.tendsto_inverse_at_top_nhds_0_nat : tendsto (λ n : ℕ, (n : ℝ≥0)⁻¹) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
by { rw ← nnreal.tendsto_coe, convert tendsto_inverse_at_top_nhds_0_nat, simp }
lemma nnreal.tendsto_const_div_at_top_nhds_0_nat (C : ℝ≥0) :
tendsto (λ n : ℕ, C / n) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
by simpa using tendsto_const_nhds.mul nnreal.tendsto_inverse_at_top_nhds_0_nat
lemma tendsto_one_div_add_at_top_nhds_0_nat :
tendsto (λ n : ℕ, 1 / ((n : ℝ) + 1)) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
suffices tendsto (λ n : ℕ, 1 / (↑(n + 1) : ℝ)) at_top (𝓝 0), by simpa,
(tendsto_add_at_top_iff_nat 1).2 (tendsto_const_div_at_top_nhds_0_nat 1)
/-! ### Powers -/
lemma tendsto_add_one_pow_at_top_at_top_of_pos [linear_ordered_semiring α] [archimedean α] {r : α}
(h : 0 < r) :
tendsto (λ n:ℕ, (r + 1)^n) at_top at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_at_top_of_monotone' (λ n m, pow_le_pow (le_add_of_nonneg_left (le_of_lt h))) $
not_bdd_above_iff.2 $ λ x, set.exists_range_iff.2 $ add_one_pow_unbounded_of_pos _ h
lemma tendsto_pow_at_top_at_top_of_one_lt [linear_ordered_ring α] [archimedean α]
{r : α} (h : 1 < r) :
tendsto (λn:ℕ, r ^ n) at_top at_top :=
sub_add_cancel r 1 ▸ tendsto_add_one_pow_at_top_at_top_of_pos (sub_pos.2 h)
lemma nat.tendsto_pow_at_top_at_top_of_one_lt {m : ℕ} (h : 1 < m) :
tendsto (λn:ℕ, m ^ n) at_top at_top :=
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (le_of_lt h) ▸
tendsto_add_one_pow_at_top_at_top_of_pos (tsub_pos_of_lt h)
lemma tendsto_norm_zero' {𝕜 : Type*} [normed_group 𝕜] :
tendsto (norm : 𝕜 → ℝ) (𝓝[{0}ᶜ] 0) (𝓝[set.Ioi 0] 0) :=
tendsto_norm_zero.inf $ tendsto_principal_principal.2 $ λ x hx, norm_pos_iff.2 hx
namespace normed_field
lemma tendsto_norm_inverse_nhds_within_0_at_top {𝕜 : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜] :
tendsto (λ x:𝕜, ∥x⁻¹∥) (𝓝[{0}ᶜ] 0) at_top :=
(tendsto_inv_zero_at_top.comp tendsto_norm_zero').congr $ λ x, (normed_field.norm_inv x).symm
lemma tendsto_norm_fpow_nhds_within_0_at_top {𝕜 : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜] {m : ℤ}
(hm : m < 0) :
tendsto (λ x : 𝕜, ∥x ^ m∥) (𝓝[{0}ᶜ] 0) at_top :=
begin
rcases neg_surjective m with ⟨m, rfl⟩,
rw neg_lt_zero at hm, lift m to ℕ using hm.le, rw int.coe_nat_pos at hm,
simp only [normed_field.norm_pow, fpow_neg, gpow_coe_nat, ← inv_pow₀],
exact (tendsto_pow_at_top hm).comp normed_field.tendsto_norm_inverse_nhds_within_0_at_top
end
@[simp] lemma continuous_at_fpow {𝕜 : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜] {m : ℤ} {x : 𝕜} :
continuous_at (λ x, x ^ m) x ↔ x ≠ 0 ∨ 0 ≤ m :=
begin
refine ⟨_, continuous_at_fpow _ _⟩,
contrapose!, rintro ⟨rfl, hm⟩ hc,
exact not_tendsto_at_top_of_tendsto_nhds (hc.tendsto.mono_left nhds_within_le_nhds).norm
(tendsto_norm_fpow_nhds_within_0_at_top hm)
end
@[simp] lemma continuous_at_inv {𝕜 : Type*} [nondiscrete_normed_field 𝕜] {x : 𝕜} :
continuous_at has_inv.inv x ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
by simpa [(@zero_lt_one ℤ _ _).not_le] using @continuous_at_fpow _ _ (-1) x
end normed_field
lemma tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 {𝕜 : Type*} [linear_ordered_field 𝕜] [archimedean 𝕜]
[topological_space 𝕜] [order_topology 𝕜] {r : 𝕜} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) :
tendsto (λn:ℕ, r^n) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
h₁.eq_or_lt.elim
(assume : 0 = r,
(tendsto_add_at_top_iff_nat 1).mp $ by simp [pow_succ, ← this, tendsto_const_nhds])
(assume : 0 < r,
have tendsto (λn, (r⁻¹ ^ n)⁻¹) at_top (𝓝 0),
from tendsto_inv_at_top_zero.comp
(tendsto_pow_at_top_at_top_of_one_lt $ one_lt_inv this h₂),
this.congr (λ n, by simp))
lemma tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_within_0_of_lt_1 {𝕜 : Type*} [linear_ordered_field 𝕜] [archimedean 𝕜]
[topological_space 𝕜] [order_topology 𝕜] {r : 𝕜} (h₁ : 0 < r) (h₂ : r < 1) :
tendsto (λn:ℕ, r^n) at_top (𝓝[Ioi 0] 0) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 h₁.le h₂,
tendsto_principal.2 $ eventually_of_forall $ λ n, pow_pos h₁ _⟩
lemma is_o_pow_pow_of_lt_left {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (h₂ : r₁ < r₂) :
is_o (λ n : ℕ, r₁ ^ n) (λ n, r₂ ^ n) at_top :=
have H : 0 < r₂ := h₁.trans_lt h₂,
is_o_of_tendsto (λ n hn, false.elim $ H.ne' $ pow_eq_zero hn) $
(tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 (div_nonneg h₁ (h₁.trans h₂.le)) ((div_lt_one H).2 h₂)).congr
(λ n, div_pow _ _ _)
lemma is_O_pow_pow_of_le_left {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (h₂ : r₁ ≤ r₂) :
is_O (λ n : ℕ, r₁ ^ n) (λ n, r₂ ^ n) at_top :=
h₂.eq_or_lt.elim (λ h, h ▸ is_O_refl _ _) (λ h, (is_o_pow_pow_of_lt_left h₁ h).is_O)
lemma is_o_pow_pow_of_abs_lt_left {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h : |r₁| < |r₂|) :
is_o (λ n : ℕ, r₁ ^ n) (λ n, r₂ ^ n) at_top :=
begin
refine (is_o.of_norm_left _).of_norm_right,
exact (is_o_pow_pow_of_lt_left (abs_nonneg r₁) h).congr (pow_abs r₁) (pow_abs r₂)
end
/-- Various statements equivalent to the fact that `f n` grows exponentially slower than `R ^ n`.
* 0: $f n = o(a ^ n)$ for some $-R < a < R$;
* 1: $f n = o(a ^ n)$ for some $0 < a < R$;
* 2: $f n = O(a ^ n)$ for some $-R < a < R$;
* 3: $f n = O(a ^ n)$ for some $0 < a < R$;
* 4: there exist `a < R` and `C` such that one of `C` and `R` is positive and $|f n| ≤ Ca^n$
for all `n`;
* 5: there exists `0 < a < R` and a positive `C` such that $|f n| ≤ Ca^n$ for all `n`;
* 6: there exists `a < R` such that $|f n| ≤ a ^ n$ for sufficiently large `n`;
* 7: there exists `0 < a < R` such that $|f n| ≤ a ^ n$ for sufficiently large `n`.
NB: For backwards compatibility, if you add more items to the list, please append them at the end of
the list. -/
lemma tfae_exists_lt_is_o_pow (f : ℕ → ℝ) (R : ℝ) :
tfae [∃ a ∈ Ioo (-R) R, is_o f (pow a) at_top,
∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, is_o f (pow a) at_top,
∃ a ∈ Ioo (-R) R, is_O f (pow a) at_top,
∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, is_O f (pow a) at_top,
∃ (a < R) C (h₀ : 0 < C ∨ 0 < R), ∀ n, |f n| ≤ C * a ^ n,
∃ (a ∈ Ioo 0 R) (C > 0), ∀ n, |f n| ≤ C * a ^ n,
∃ a < R, ∀ᶠ n in at_top, |f n| ≤ a ^ n,
∃ a ∈ Ioo 0 R, ∀ᶠ n in at_top, |f n| ≤ a ^ n] :=
begin
have A : Ico 0 R ⊆ Ioo (-R) R,
from λ x hx, ⟨(neg_lt_zero.2 (hx.1.trans_lt hx.2)).trans_le hx.1, hx.2⟩,
have B : Ioo 0 R ⊆ Ioo (-R) R := subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ico_self A,
-- First we prove that 1-4 are equivalent using 2 → 3 → 4, 1 → 3, and 2 → 1
tfae_have : 1 → 3, from λ ⟨a, ha, H⟩, ⟨a, ha, H.is_O⟩,
tfae_have : 2 → 1, from λ ⟨a, ha, H⟩, ⟨a, B ha, H⟩,
tfae_have : 3 → 2,
{ rintro ⟨a, ha, H⟩,
rcases exists_between (abs_lt.2 ha) with ⟨b, hab, hbR⟩,
exact ⟨b, ⟨(abs_nonneg a).trans_lt hab, hbR⟩,
H.trans_is_o (is_o_pow_pow_of_abs_lt_left (hab.trans_le (le_abs_self b)))⟩ },
tfae_have : 2 → 4, from λ ⟨a, ha, H⟩, ⟨a, ha, H.is_O⟩,
tfae_have : 4 → 3, from λ ⟨a, ha, H⟩, ⟨a, B ha, H⟩,
-- Add 5 and 6 using 4 → 6 → 5 → 3
tfae_have : 4 → 6,
{ rintro ⟨a, ha, H⟩,
rcases bound_of_is_O_nat_at_top H with ⟨C, hC₀, hC⟩,
refine ⟨a, ha, C, hC₀, λ n, _⟩,
simpa only [real.norm_eq_abs, abs_pow, abs_of_nonneg ha.1.le]
using hC (pow_ne_zero n ha.1.ne') },
tfae_have : 6 → 5, from λ ⟨a, ha, C, H₀, H⟩, ⟨a, ha.2, C, or.inl H₀, H⟩,
tfae_have : 5 → 3,
{ rintro ⟨a, ha, C, h₀, H⟩,
rcases sign_cases_of_C_mul_pow_nonneg (λ n, (abs_nonneg _).trans (H n)) with rfl | ⟨hC₀, ha₀⟩,
{ obtain rfl : f = 0, by { ext n, simpa using H n },
simp only [lt_irrefl, false_or] at h₀,
exact ⟨0, ⟨neg_lt_zero.2 h₀, h₀⟩, is_O_zero _ _⟩ },
exact ⟨a, A ⟨ha₀, ha⟩,
is_O_of_le' _ (λ n, (H n).trans $ mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_abs_self _) hC₀.le)⟩ },
-- Add 7 and 8 using 2 → 8 → 7 → 3
tfae_have : 2 → 8,
{ rintro ⟨a, ha, H⟩,
refine ⟨a, ha, (H.def zero_lt_one).mono (λ n hn, _)⟩,
rwa [real.norm_eq_abs, real.norm_eq_abs, one_mul, abs_pow, abs_of_pos ha.1] at hn },
tfae_have : 8 → 7, from λ ⟨a, ha, H⟩, ⟨a, ha.2, H⟩,
tfae_have : 7 → 3,
{ rintro ⟨a, ha, H⟩,
have : 0 ≤ a, from nonneg_of_eventually_pow_nonneg (H.mono $ λ n, (abs_nonneg _).trans),
refine ⟨a, A ⟨this, ha⟩, is_O.of_bound 1 _⟩,
simpa only [real.norm_eq_abs, one_mul, abs_pow, abs_of_nonneg this] },
tfae_finish
end
lemma uniformity_basis_dist_pow_of_lt_1 {α : Type*} [pseudo_metric_space α]
{r : ℝ} (h₀ : 0 < r) (h₁ : r < 1) :
(𝓤 α).has_basis (λ k : ℕ, true) (λ k, {p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r ^ k}) :=
metric.mk_uniformity_basis (λ i _, pow_pos h₀ _) $ λ ε ε0,
(exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h₁).imp $ λ k hk, ⟨trivial, hk.le⟩
lemma geom_lt {u : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n)
(h : ∀ k < n, c * u k < u (k + 1)) :
c ^ n * u 0 < u n :=
begin
refine (monotone_mul_left_of_nonneg hc).seq_pos_lt_seq_of_le_of_lt hn _ _ h,
{ simp },
{ simp [pow_succ, mul_assoc, le_refl] }
end
lemma geom_le {u : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ k < n, c * u k ≤ u (k + 1)) :
c ^ n * u 0 ≤ u n :=
by refine (monotone_mul_left_of_nonneg hc).seq_le_seq n _ _ h; simp [pow_succ, mul_assoc, le_refl]
lemma lt_geom {u : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n)
(h : ∀ k < n, u (k + 1) < c * u k) :
u n < c ^ n * u 0 :=
begin
refine (monotone_mul_left_of_nonneg hc).seq_pos_lt_seq_of_lt_of_le hn _ h _,
{ simp },
{ simp [pow_succ, mul_assoc, le_refl] }
end
lemma le_geom {u : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ k < n, u (k + 1) ≤ c * u k) :
u n ≤ (c ^ n) * u 0 :=
by refine (monotone_mul_left_of_nonneg hc).seq_le_seq n _ h _; simp [pow_succ, mul_assoc, le_refl]
/-- For any natural `k` and a real `r > 1` we have `n ^ k = o(r ^ n)` as `n → ∞`. -/
lemma is_o_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt {R : Type*} [normed_ring R] (k : ℕ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 1 < r) :
is_o (λ n, n ^ k : ℕ → R) (λ n, r ^ n) at_top :=
begin
have : tendsto (λ x : ℝ, x ^ k) (𝓝[Ioi 1] 1) (𝓝 1),
from ((continuous_id.pow k).tendsto' (1 : ℝ) 1 (one_pow _)).mono_left inf_le_left,
obtain ⟨r' : ℝ, hr' : r' ^ k < r, h1 : 1 < r'⟩ :=
((this.eventually (gt_mem_nhds hr)).and self_mem_nhds_within).exists,
have h0 : 0 ≤ r' := zero_le_one.trans h1.le,
suffices : is_O _ (λ n : ℕ, (r' ^ k) ^ n) at_top,
from this.trans_is_o (is_o_pow_pow_of_lt_left (pow_nonneg h0 _) hr'),
conv in ((r' ^ _) ^ _) { rw [← pow_mul, mul_comm, pow_mul] },
suffices : ∀ n : ℕ, ∥(n : R)∥ ≤ (r' - 1)⁻¹ * ∥(1 : R)∥ * ∥r' ^ n∥,
from (is_O_of_le' _ this).pow _,
intro n, rw mul_right_comm,
refine n.norm_cast_le.trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ (norm_nonneg _)),
simpa [div_eq_inv_mul, real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg h0] using n.cast_le_pow_div_sub h1
end
/-- For a real `r > 1` we have `n = o(r ^ n)` as `n → ∞`. -/
lemma is_o_coe_const_pow_of_one_lt {R : Type*} [normed_ring R] {r : ℝ} (hr : 1 < r) :
is_o (coe : ℕ → R) (λ n, r ^ n) at_top :=
by simpa only [pow_one] using is_o_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt 1 hr
/-- If `∥r₁∥ < r₂`, then for any naturak `k` we have `n ^ k r₁ ^ n = o (r₂ ^ n)` as `n → ∞`. -/
lemma is_o_pow_const_mul_const_pow_const_pow_of_norm_lt {R : Type*} [normed_ring R] (k : ℕ)
{r₁ : R} {r₂ : ℝ} (h : ∥r₁∥ < r₂) :
is_o (λ n, n ^ k * r₁ ^ n : ℕ → R) (λ n, r₂ ^ n) at_top :=
begin
by_cases h0 : r₁ = 0,
{ refine (is_o_zero _ _).congr' (mem_at_top_sets.2 $ ⟨1, λ n hn, _⟩) eventually_eq.rfl,
simp [zero_pow (zero_lt_one.trans_le hn), h0] },
rw [← ne.def, ← norm_pos_iff] at h0,
have A : is_o (λ n, n ^ k : ℕ → R) (λ n, (r₂ / ∥r₁∥) ^ n) at_top,
from is_o_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt k ((one_lt_div h0).2 h),
suffices : is_O (λ n, r₁ ^ n) (λ n, ∥r₁∥ ^ n) at_top,
by simpa [div_mul_cancel _ (pow_pos h0 _).ne'] using A.mul_is_O this,
exact is_O.of_bound 1 (by simpa using eventually_norm_pow_le r₁)
end
lemma tendsto_pow_const_div_const_pow_of_one_lt (k : ℕ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 1 < r) :
tendsto (λ n, n ^ k / r ^ n : ℕ → ℝ) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
(is_o_pow_const_const_pow_of_one_lt k hr).tendsto_0
/-- If `|r| < 1`, then `n ^ k r ^ n` tends to zero for any natural `k`. -/
lemma tendsto_pow_const_mul_const_pow_of_abs_lt_one (k : ℕ) {r : ℝ} (hr : |r| < 1) :
tendsto (λ n, n ^ k * r ^ n : ℕ → ℝ) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
begin
by_cases h0 : r = 0,
{ exact tendsto_const_nhds.congr'
(mem_at_top_sets.2 ⟨1, λ n hn, by simp [zero_lt_one.trans_le hn, h0]⟩) },
have hr' : 1 < (|r|)⁻¹, from one_lt_inv (abs_pos.2 h0) hr,
rw tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero,
simpa [div_eq_mul_inv] using tendsto_pow_const_div_const_pow_of_one_lt k hr'
end
/-- If a sequence `v` of real numbers satisfies `k * v n ≤ v (n+1)` with `1 < k`,
then it goes to +∞. -/
lemma tendsto_at_top_of_geom_le {v : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (h₀ : 0 < v 0) (hc : 1 < c)
(hu : ∀ n, c * v n ≤ v (n + 1)) : tendsto v at_top at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_mono (λ n, geom_le (zero_le_one.trans hc.le) n (λ k hk, hu k)) $
(tendsto_pow_at_top_at_top_of_one_lt hc).at_top_mul_const h₀
lemma nnreal.tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1) :
tendsto (λ n:ℕ, r^n) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
nnreal.tendsto_coe.1 $ by simp only [nnreal.coe_pow, nnreal.coe_zero,
tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 r.coe_nonneg hr]
lemma ennreal.tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 {r : ℝ≥0∞} (hr : r < 1) :
tendsto (λ n:ℕ, r^n) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
begin
rcases ennreal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 hr with ⟨r, rfl, hr'⟩,
rw [← ennreal.coe_zero],
norm_cast at *,
apply nnreal.tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 hr
end
/-- In a normed ring, the powers of an element x with `∥x∥ < 1` tend to zero. -/
lemma tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_norm_lt_1 {R : Type*} [normed_ring R] {x : R}
(h : ∥x∥ < 1) : tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), x ^ n) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
begin
apply squeeze_zero_norm' (eventually_norm_pow_le x),
exact tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 (norm_nonneg _) h,
end
lemma tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_abs_lt_1 {r : ℝ} (h : |r| < 1) :
tendsto (λn:ℕ, r^n) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_norm_lt_1 h
/-! ### Geometric series-/
section geometric
lemma has_sum_geometric_of_lt_1 {r : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) :
has_sum (λn:ℕ, r ^ n) (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
have r ≠ 1, from ne_of_lt h₂,
have tendsto (λn, (r ^ n - 1) * (r - 1)⁻¹) at_top (𝓝 ((0 - 1) * (r - 1)⁻¹)),
from ((tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 h₁ h₂).sub tendsto_const_nhds).mul tendsto_const_nhds,
have (λ n, (∑ i in range n, r ^ i)) = (λ n, geom_sum r n) := rfl,
(has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_nonneg (pow_nonneg h₁) _).mpr $
by simp [neg_inv, geom_sum_eq, div_eq_mul_inv, *] at *
lemma summable_geometric_of_lt_1 {r : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) : summable (λn:ℕ, r ^ n) :=
⟨_, has_sum_geometric_of_lt_1 h₁ h₂⟩
lemma tsum_geometric_of_lt_1 {r : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) : ∑'n:ℕ, r ^ n = (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
(has_sum_geometric_of_lt_1 h₁ h₂).tsum_eq
lemma has_sum_geometric_two : has_sum (λn:ℕ, ((1:ℝ)/2) ^ n) 2 :=
by convert has_sum_geometric_of_lt_1 _ _; norm_num
lemma summable_geometric_two : summable (λn:ℕ, ((1:ℝ)/2) ^ n) :=
⟨_, has_sum_geometric_two⟩
lemma tsum_geometric_two : ∑'n:ℕ, ((1:ℝ)/2) ^ n = 2 :=
has_sum_geometric_two.tsum_eq
lemma sum_geometric_two_le (n : ℕ) : ∑ (i : ℕ) in range n, (1 / (2 : ℝ)) ^ i ≤ 2 :=
begin
have : ∀ i, 0 ≤ (1 / (2 : ℝ)) ^ i,
{ intro i, apply pow_nonneg, norm_num },
convert sum_le_tsum (range n) (λ i _, this i) summable_geometric_two,
exact tsum_geometric_two.symm
end
lemma has_sum_geometric_two' (a : ℝ) : has_sum (λn:ℕ, (a / 2) / 2 ^ n) a :=
begin
convert has_sum.mul_left (a / 2) (has_sum_geometric_of_lt_1
(le_of_lt one_half_pos) one_half_lt_one),
{ funext n, simp, refl, },
{ norm_num }
end
lemma summable_geometric_two' (a : ℝ) : summable (λ n:ℕ, (a / 2) / 2 ^ n) :=
⟨a, has_sum_geometric_two' a⟩
lemma tsum_geometric_two' (a : ℝ) : ∑' n:ℕ, (a / 2) / 2^n = a :=
(has_sum_geometric_two' a).tsum_eq
/-- **Sum of a Geometric Series** -/
lemma nnreal.has_sum_geometric {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1) :
has_sum (λ n : ℕ, r ^ n) (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
begin
apply nnreal.has_sum_coe.1,
push_cast,
rw [nnreal.coe_sub (le_of_lt hr)],
exact has_sum_geometric_of_lt_1 r.coe_nonneg hr
end
lemma nnreal.summable_geometric {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1) : summable (λn:ℕ, r ^ n) :=
⟨_, nnreal.has_sum_geometric hr⟩
lemma tsum_geometric_nnreal {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1) : ∑'n:ℕ, r ^ n = (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
(nnreal.has_sum_geometric hr).tsum_eq
/-- The series `pow r` converges to `(1-r)⁻¹`. For `r < 1` the RHS is a finite number,
and for `1 ≤ r` the RHS equals `∞`. -/
@[simp] lemma ennreal.tsum_geometric (r : ℝ≥0∞) : ∑'n:ℕ, r ^ n = (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
begin
cases lt_or_le r 1 with hr hr,
{ rcases ennreal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 hr with ⟨r, rfl, hr'⟩,
norm_cast at *,
convert ennreal.tsum_coe_eq (nnreal.has_sum_geometric hr),
rw [ennreal.coe_inv $ ne_of_gt $ tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hr] },
{ rw [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr hr, ennreal.inv_zero, ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_nat, supr_eq_top],
refine λ a ha, (ennreal.exists_nat_gt (lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 ha)).imp
(λ n hn, lt_of_lt_of_le hn _),
calc (n:ℝ≥0∞) = ∑ i in range n, 1 : by rw [sum_const, nsmul_one, card_range]
... ≤ ∑ i in range n, r ^ i : sum_le_sum (λ k _, one_le_pow_of_one_le' hr k) }
end
variables {K : Type*} [normed_field K] {ξ : K}
lemma has_sum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 (h : ∥ξ∥ < 1) : has_sum (λn:ℕ, ξ ^ n) (1 - ξ)⁻¹ :=
begin
have xi_ne_one : ξ ≠ 1, by { contrapose! h, simp [h] },
have A : tendsto (λn, (ξ ^ n - 1) * (ξ - 1)⁻¹) at_top (𝓝 ((0 - 1) * (ξ - 1)⁻¹)),
from ((tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_norm_lt_1 h).sub tendsto_const_nhds).mul tendsto_const_nhds,
have B : (λ n, (∑ i in range n, ξ ^ i)) = (λ n, geom_sum ξ n) := rfl,
rw [has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_summable_norm, B],
{ simpa [geom_sum_eq, xi_ne_one, neg_inv, div_eq_mul_inv] using A },
{ simp [normed_field.norm_pow, summable_geometric_of_lt_1 (norm_nonneg _) h] }
end
lemma summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 (h : ∥ξ∥ < 1) : summable (λn:ℕ, ξ ^ n) :=
⟨_, has_sum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 h⟩
lemma tsum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 (h : ∥ξ∥ < 1) : ∑'n:ℕ, ξ ^ n = (1 - ξ)⁻¹ :=
(has_sum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 h).tsum_eq
lemma has_sum_geometric_of_abs_lt_1 {r : ℝ} (h : |r| < 1) : has_sum (λn:ℕ, r ^ n) (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
has_sum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 h
lemma summable_geometric_of_abs_lt_1 {r : ℝ} (h : |r| < 1) : summable (λn:ℕ, r ^ n) :=
summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 h
lemma tsum_geometric_of_abs_lt_1 {r : ℝ} (h : |r| < 1) : ∑'n:ℕ, r ^ n = (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
tsum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 h
/-- A geometric series in a normed field is summable iff the norm of the common ratio is less than
one. -/
@[simp] lemma summable_geometric_iff_norm_lt_1 : summable (λ n : ℕ, ξ ^ n) ↔ ∥ξ∥ < 1 :=
begin
refine ⟨λ h, _, summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_1⟩,
obtain ⟨k : ℕ, hk : dist (ξ ^ k) 0 < 1⟩ :=
(h.tendsto_cofinite_zero.eventually (ball_mem_nhds _ zero_lt_one)).exists,
simp only [normed_field.norm_pow, dist_zero_right] at hk,
rw [← one_pow k] at hk,
exact lt_of_pow_lt_pow _ zero_le_one hk
end
end geometric
section mul_geometric
lemma summable_norm_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 {R : Type*} [normed_ring R]
(k : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : ∥r∥ < 1) : summable (λ n : ℕ, ∥(n ^ k * r ^ n : R)∥) :=
begin
rcases exists_between hr with ⟨r', hrr', h⟩,
exact summable_of_is_O_nat (summable_geometric_of_lt_1 ((norm_nonneg _).trans hrr'.le) h)
(is_o_pow_const_mul_const_pow_const_pow_of_norm_lt _ hrr').is_O.norm_left
end
lemma summable_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 {R : Type*} [normed_ring R] [complete_space R]
(k : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : ∥r∥ < 1) : summable (λ n, n ^ k * r ^ n : ℕ → R) :=
summable_of_summable_norm $ summable_norm_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 _ hr
/-- If `∥r∥ < 1`, then `∑' n : ℕ, n * r ^ n = r / (1 - r) ^ 2`, `has_sum` version. -/
lemma has_sum_coe_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 {𝕜 : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜] [complete_space 𝕜]
{r : 𝕜} (hr : ∥r∥ < 1) : has_sum (λ n, n * r ^ n : ℕ → 𝕜) (r / (1 - r) ^ 2) :=
begin
have A : summable (λ n, n * r ^ n : ℕ → 𝕜),
by simpa using summable_pow_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 1 hr,
have B : has_sum (pow r : ℕ → 𝕜) (1 - r)⁻¹, from has_sum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 hr,
refine A.has_sum_iff.2 _,
have hr' : r ≠ 1, by { rintro rfl, simpa [lt_irrefl] using hr },
set s : 𝕜 := ∑' n : ℕ, n * r ^ n,
calc s = (1 - r) * s / (1 - r) : (mul_div_cancel_left _ (sub_ne_zero.2 hr'.symm)).symm
... = (s - r * s) / (1 - r) : by rw [sub_mul, one_mul]
... = ((0 : ℕ) * r ^ 0 + (∑' n : ℕ, (n + 1) * r ^ (n + 1)) - r * s) / (1 - r) :
by { congr, exact tsum_eq_zero_add A }
... = (r * (∑' n : ℕ, (n + 1) * r ^ n) - r * s) / (1 - r) :
by simp [pow_succ, mul_left_comm _ r, tsum_mul_left]
... = r / (1 - r) ^ 2 :
by simp [add_mul, tsum_add A B.summable, mul_add, B.tsum_eq, ← div_eq_mul_inv, sq,
div_div_eq_div_mul]
end
/-- If `∥r∥ < 1`, then `∑' n : ℕ, n * r ^ n = r / (1 - r) ^ 2`. -/
lemma tsum_coe_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 {𝕜 : Type*} [normed_field 𝕜] [complete_space 𝕜]
{r : 𝕜} (hr : ∥r∥ < 1) :
(∑' n : ℕ, n * r ^ n : 𝕜) = (r / (1 - r) ^ 2) :=
(has_sum_coe_mul_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 hr).tsum_eq
end mul_geometric
/-!
### Sequences with geometrically decaying distance in metric spaces
In this paragraph, we discuss sequences in metric spaces or emetric spaces for which the distance
between two consecutive terms decays geometrically. We show that such sequences are Cauchy
sequences, and bound their distances to the limit. We also discuss series with geometrically
decaying terms.
-/
section edist_le_geometric
variables [pseudo_emetric_space α] (r C : ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r < 1) (hC : C ≠ ⊤) {f : ℕ → α}
(hu : ∀n, edist (f n) (f (n+1)) ≤ C * r^n)
include hr hC hu
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, `C ≠ ∞`, `r < 1`,
then `f` is a Cauchy sequence.-/
lemma cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_geometric : cauchy_seq f :=
begin
refine cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_of_tsum_ne_top _ hu _,
rw [ennreal.tsum_mul_left, ennreal.tsum_geometric],
refine ennreal.mul_ne_top hC (ennreal.inv_ne_top.2 _),
exact (tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hr).ne'
end
omit hr hC
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, then the distance from
`f n` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C * r^n / (1 - r)`. -/
lemma edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) (n : ℕ) :
edist (f n) a ≤ (C * r^n) / (1 - r) :=
begin
convert edist_le_tsum_of_edist_le_of_tendsto _ hu ha _,
simp only [pow_add, ennreal.tsum_mul_left, ennreal.tsum_geometric, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc]
end
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, then the distance from
`f 0` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C / (1 - r)`. -/
lemma edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto₀ {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) :
edist (f 0) a ≤ C / (1 - r) :=
by simpa only [pow_zero, mul_one] using edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto r C hu ha 0
end edist_le_geometric
section edist_le_geometric_two
variables [pseudo_emetric_space α] (C : ℝ≥0∞) (hC : C ≠ ⊤) {f : ℕ → α}
(hu : ∀n, edist (f n) (f (n+1)) ≤ C / 2^n) {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a))
include hC hu
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * 2^-n`, then `f` is a Cauchy sequence.-/
lemma cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_geometric_two : cauchy_seq f :=
begin
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, ennreal.inv_pow] at hu,
refine cauchy_seq_of_edist_le_geometric 2⁻¹ C _ hC hu,
simp [ennreal.one_lt_two]
end
omit hC
include ha
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * 2^-n`, then the distance from
`f n` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `2 * C * 2^-n`. -/
lemma edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto (n : ℕ) :
edist (f n) a ≤ 2 * C / 2^n :=
begin
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, ennreal.inv_pow] at *,
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm],
convert edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto 2⁻¹ C hu ha n,
rw [ennreal.one_sub_inv_two, ennreal.inv_inv]
end
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * 2^-n`, then the distance from
`f 0` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `2 * C`. -/
lemma edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto₀: edist (f 0) a ≤ 2 * C :=
by simpa only [pow_zero, div_eq_mul_inv, ennreal.inv_one, mul_one]
using edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto C hu ha 0
end edist_le_geometric_two
section le_geometric
variables [pseudo_metric_space α] {r C : ℝ} (hr : r < 1) {f : ℕ → α}
(hu : ∀n, dist (f n) (f (n+1)) ≤ C * r^n)
include hr hu
lemma aux_has_sum_of_le_geometric : has_sum (λ n : ℕ, C * r^n) (C / (1 - r)) :=
begin
rcases sign_cases_of_C_mul_pow_nonneg (λ n, dist_nonneg.trans (hu n)) with rfl | ⟨C₀, r₀⟩,
{ simp [has_sum_zero] },
{ refine has_sum.mul_left C _,
simpa using has_sum_geometric_of_lt_1 r₀ hr }
end
variables (r C)
/-- If `dist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, `r < 1`, then `f` is a Cauchy sequence.
Note that this lemma does not assume `0 ≤ C` or `0 ≤ r`. -/
lemma cauchy_seq_of_le_geometric : cauchy_seq f :=
cauchy_seq_of_dist_le_of_summable _ hu ⟨_, aux_has_sum_of_le_geometric hr hu⟩
/-- If `dist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, `r < 1`, then the distance from
`f n` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C * r^n / (1 - r)`. -/
lemma dist_le_of_le_geometric_of_tendsto₀ {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) :
dist (f 0) a ≤ C / (1 - r) :=
(aux_has_sum_of_le_geometric hr hu).tsum_eq ▸
dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto₀ _ hu ⟨_, aux_has_sum_of_le_geometric hr hu⟩ ha
/-- If `dist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, `r < 1`, then the distance from
`f 0` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C / (1 - r)`. -/
lemma dist_le_of_le_geometric_of_tendsto {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) (n : ℕ) :
dist (f n) a ≤ (C * r^n) / (1 - r) :=
begin
have := aux_has_sum_of_le_geometric hr hu,
convert dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto _ hu ⟨_, this⟩ ha n,
simp only [pow_add, mul_left_comm C, mul_div_right_comm],
rw [mul_comm],
exact (this.mul_left _).tsum_eq.symm
end
omit hr hu
variable (hu₂ : ∀ n, dist (f n) (f (n+1)) ≤ (C / 2) / 2^n)
/-- If `dist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `(C / 2) / 2^n`, then `f` is a Cauchy sequence. -/
lemma cauchy_seq_of_le_geometric_two : cauchy_seq f :=
cauchy_seq_of_dist_le_of_summable _ hu₂ $ ⟨_, has_sum_geometric_two' C⟩
/-- If `dist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `(C / 2) / 2^n`, then the distance from
`f 0` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C`. -/
lemma dist_le_of_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto₀ {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) :
dist (f 0) a ≤ C :=
(tsum_geometric_two' C) ▸ dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto₀ _ hu₂ (summable_geometric_two' C) ha
include hu₂
/-- If `dist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `(C / 2) / 2^n`, then the distance from
`f n` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C / 2^n`. -/
lemma dist_le_of_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto {a : α} (ha : tendsto f at_top (𝓝 a)) (n : ℕ) :
dist (f n) a ≤ C / 2^n :=
begin
convert dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto _ hu₂ (summable_geometric_two' C) ha n,
simp only [add_comm n, pow_add, ← div_div_eq_div_mul],
symmetry,
exact ((has_sum_geometric_two' C).div_const _).tsum_eq
end
end le_geometric
section summable_le_geometric
variables [semi_normed_group α] {r C : ℝ} {f : ℕ → α}
lemma semi_normed_group.cauchy_seq_of_le_geometric {C : ℝ} {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 1)
{u : ℕ → α} (h : ∀ n, ∥u n - u (n + 1)∥ ≤ C*r^n) : cauchy_seq u :=
cauchy_seq_of_le_geometric r C hr (by simpa [dist_eq_norm] using h)
lemma dist_partial_sum_le_of_le_geometric (hf : ∀n, ∥f n∥ ≤ C * r^n) (n : ℕ) :
dist (∑ i in range n, f i) (∑ i in range (n+1), f i) ≤ C * r ^ n :=
begin
rw [sum_range_succ, dist_eq_norm, ← norm_neg, neg_sub, add_sub_cancel'],
exact hf n,
end
/-- If `∥f n∥ ≤ C * r ^ n` for all `n : ℕ` and some `r < 1`, then the partial sums of `f` form a
Cauchy sequence. This lemma does not assume `0 ≤ r` or `0 ≤ C`. -/
lemma cauchy_seq_finset_of_geometric_bound (hr : r < 1) (hf : ∀n, ∥f n∥ ≤ C * r^n) :
cauchy_seq (λ s : finset (ℕ), ∑ x in s, f x) :=
cauchy_seq_finset_of_norm_bounded _
(aux_has_sum_of_le_geometric hr (dist_partial_sum_le_of_le_geometric hf)).summable hf
/-- If `∥f n∥ ≤ C * r ^ n` for all `n : ℕ` and some `r < 1`, then the partial sums of `f` are within
distance `C * r ^ n / (1 - r)` of the sum of the series. This lemma does not assume `0 ≤ r` or
`0 ≤ C`. -/
lemma norm_sub_le_of_geometric_bound_of_has_sum (hr : r < 1) (hf : ∀n, ∥f n∥ ≤ C * r^n)
{a : α} (ha : has_sum f a) (n : ℕ) :
∥(∑ x in finset.range n, f x) - a∥ ≤ (C * r ^ n) / (1 - r) :=
begin
rw ← dist_eq_norm,
apply dist_le_of_le_geometric_of_tendsto r C hr (dist_partial_sum_le_of_le_geometric hf),
exact ha.tendsto_sum_nat
end
@[simp] lemma dist_partial_sum (u : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
dist (∑ k in range (n + 1), u k) (∑ k in range n, u k) = ∥u n∥ :=
by simp [dist_eq_norm, sum_range_succ]
@[simp] lemma dist_partial_sum' (u : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
dist (∑ k in range n, u k) (∑ k in range (n+1), u k) = ∥u n∥ :=
by simp [dist_eq_norm', sum_range_succ]
lemma cauchy_series_of_le_geometric {C : ℝ} {u : ℕ → α}
{r : ℝ} (hr : r < 1) (h : ∀ n, ∥u n∥ ≤ C*r^n) : cauchy_seq (λ n, ∑ k in range n, u k) :=
cauchy_seq_of_le_geometric r C hr (by simp [h])
lemma normed_group.cauchy_series_of_le_geometric' {C : ℝ} {u : ℕ → α} {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 1)
(h : ∀ n, ∥u n∥ ≤ C*r^n) : cauchy_seq (λ n, ∑ k in range (n + 1), u k) :=
begin
by_cases hC : C = 0,
{ subst hC,
simp at h,
exact cauchy_seq_of_le_geometric 0 0 zero_lt_one (by simp [h]) },
have : 0 ≤ C,
{ simpa using (norm_nonneg _).trans (h 0) },
replace hC : 0 < C,
from (ne.symm hC).le_iff_lt.mp this,
have : 0 ≤ r,
{ have := (norm_nonneg _).trans (h 1),
rw pow_one at this,
exact (zero_le_mul_left hC).mp this },
simp_rw finset.sum_range_succ_comm,
have : cauchy_seq u,
{ apply tendsto.cauchy_seq,
apply squeeze_zero_norm h,
rw show 0 = C*0, by simp,
exact tendsto_const_nhds.mul (tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_lt_1 this hr) },
exact this.add (cauchy_series_of_le_geometric hr h),
end
lemma normed_group.cauchy_series_of_le_geometric'' {C : ℝ} {u : ℕ → α} {N : ℕ} {r : ℝ}
(hr₀ : 0 < r) (hr₁ : r < 1)
(h : ∀ n ≥ N, ∥u n∥ ≤ C*r^n) : cauchy_seq (λ n, ∑ k in range (n + 1), u k) :=
begin
set v : ℕ → α := λ n, if n < N then 0 else u n,
have hC : 0 ≤ C,
from (zero_le_mul_right $ pow_pos hr₀ N).mp ((norm_nonneg _).trans $ h N $ le_refl N),
have : ∀ n ≥ N, u n = v n,
{ intros n hn,
simp [v, hn, if_neg (not_lt.mpr hn)] },
refine cauchy_seq_sum_of_eventually_eq this (normed_group.cauchy_series_of_le_geometric' hr₁ _),
{ exact C },
intro n,
dsimp [v],
split_ifs with H H,
{ rw norm_zero,
exact mul_nonneg hC (pow_nonneg hr₀.le _) },
{ push_neg at H,
exact h _ H }
end
end summable_le_geometric
section normed_ring_geometric
variables {R : Type*} [normed_ring R] [complete_space R]
open normed_space
/-- A geometric series in a complete normed ring is summable.
Proved above (same name, different namespace) for not-necessarily-complete normed fields. -/
lemma normed_ring.summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_1
(x : R) (h : ∥x∥ < 1) : summable (λ (n:ℕ), x ^ n) :=
begin
have h1 : summable (λ (n:ℕ), ∥x∥ ^ n) := summable_geometric_of_lt_1 (norm_nonneg _) h,
refine summable_of_norm_bounded_eventually _ h1 _,
rw nat.cofinite_eq_at_top,
exact eventually_norm_pow_le x,
end
/-- Bound for the sum of a geometric series in a normed ring. This formula does not assume that the
normed ring satisfies the axiom `∥1∥ = 1`. -/
lemma normed_ring.tsum_geometric_of_norm_lt_1
(x : R) (h : ∥x∥ < 1) : ∥∑' n:ℕ, x ^ n∥ ≤ ∥(1:R)∥ - 1 + (1 - ∥x∥)⁻¹ :=
begin
rw tsum_eq_zero_add (normed_ring.summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 x h),
simp only [pow_zero],
refine le_trans (norm_add_le _ _) _,
have : ∥∑' b : ℕ, (λ n, x ^ (n + 1)) b∥ ≤ (1 - ∥x∥)⁻¹ - 1,
{ refine tsum_of_norm_bounded _ (λ b, norm_pow_le' _ (nat.succ_pos b)),
convert (has_sum_nat_add_iff' 1).mpr (has_sum_geometric_of_lt_1 (norm_nonneg x) h),
simp },
linarith
end
lemma geom_series_mul_neg (x : R) (h : ∥x∥ < 1) :
(∑' i:ℕ, x ^ i) * (1 - x) = 1 :=
begin
have := ((normed_ring.summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 x h).has_sum.mul_right (1 - x)),
refine tendsto_nhds_unique this.tendsto_sum_nat _,
have : tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), 1 - x ^ n) at_top (𝓝 1),
{ simpa using tendsto_const_nhds.sub (tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_norm_lt_1 h) },
convert ← this,
ext n,
rw [←geom_sum_mul_neg, geom_sum_def, finset.sum_mul],
end
lemma mul_neg_geom_series (x : R) (h : ∥x∥ < 1) :
(1 - x) * ∑' i:ℕ, x ^ i = 1 :=
begin
have := (normed_ring.summable_geometric_of_norm_lt_1 x h).has_sum.mul_left (1 - x),
refine tendsto_nhds_unique this.tendsto_sum_nat _,
have : tendsto (λ (n : ℕ), 1 - x ^ n) at_top (nhds 1),
{ simpa using tendsto_const_nhds.sub
(tendsto_pow_at_top_nhds_0_of_norm_lt_1 h) },
convert ← this,
ext n,
rw [←mul_neg_geom_sum, geom_sum_def, finset.mul_sum]
end
end normed_ring_geometric
/-! ### Summability tests based on comparison with geometric series -/
lemma summable_of_ratio_norm_eventually_le {α : Type*} [semi_normed_group α] [complete_space α]
{f : ℕ → α} {r : ℝ} (hr₁ : r < 1)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in at_top, ∥f (n+1)∥ ≤ r * ∥f n∥) : summable f :=
begin
by_cases hr₀ : 0 ≤ r,
{ rw eventually_at_top at h,
rcases h with ⟨N, hN⟩,
rw ← @summable_nat_add_iff α _ _ _ _ N,
refine summable_of_norm_bounded (λ n, ∥f N∥ * r^n)
(summable.mul_left _ $ summable_geometric_of_lt_1 hr₀ hr₁) (λ n, _),
conv_rhs {rw [mul_comm, ← zero_add N]},
refine le_geom hr₀ n (λ i _, _),
convert hN (i + N) (N.le_add_left i) using 3,
ac_refl },
{ push_neg at hr₀,
refine summable_of_norm_bounded_eventually 0 summable_zero _,
rw nat.cofinite_eq_at_top,
filter_upwards [h],
intros n hn,
by_contra h,
push_neg at h,
exact not_lt.mpr (norm_nonneg _) (lt_of_le_of_lt hn $ mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos hr₀ h) }
end
lemma summable_of_ratio_test_tendsto_lt_one {α : Type*} [normed_group α] [complete_space α]
{f : ℕ → α} {l : ℝ} (hl₁ : l < 1) (hf : ∀ᶠ n in at_top, f n ≠ 0)
(h : tendsto (λ n, ∥f (n+1)∥/∥f n∥) at_top (𝓝 l)) : summable f :=
begin
rcases exists_between hl₁ with ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁⟩,
refine summable_of_ratio_norm_eventually_le hr₁ _,
filter_upwards [eventually_le_of_tendsto_lt hr₀ h, hf],
intros n h₀ h₁,
rwa ← div_le_iff (norm_pos_iff.mpr h₁)
end
lemma not_summable_of_ratio_norm_eventually_ge {α : Type*} [semi_normed_group α]
{f : ℕ → α} {r : ℝ} (hr : 1 < r) (hf : ∃ᶠ n in at_top, ∥f n∥ ≠ 0)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in at_top, r * ∥f n∥ ≤ ∥f (n+1)∥) : ¬ summable f :=
begin
rw eventually_at_top at h,
rcases h with ⟨N₀, hN₀⟩,
rw frequently_at_top at hf,
rcases hf N₀ with ⟨N, hNN₀ : N₀ ≤ N, hN⟩,
rw ← @summable_nat_add_iff α _ _ _ _ N,
refine mt summable.tendsto_at_top_zero
(λ h', not_tendsto_at_top_of_tendsto_nhds (tendsto_norm_zero.comp h') _),
convert tendsto_at_top_of_geom_le _ hr _,
{ refine lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) _,
intro h'',
specialize hN₀ N hNN₀,
simp only [comp_app, zero_add] at h'',
exact hN h''.symm },
{ intro i,
dsimp only [comp_app],
convert (hN₀ (i + N) (hNN₀.trans (N.le_add_left i))) using 3,
ac_refl }
end
lemma not_summable_of_ratio_test_tendsto_gt_one {α : Type*} [semi_normed_group α]
{f : ℕ → α} {l : ℝ} (hl : 1 < l)
(h : tendsto (λ n, ∥f (n+1)∥/∥f n∥) at_top (𝓝 l)) : ¬ summable f :=
begin
have key : ∀ᶠ n in at_top, ∥f n∥ ≠ 0,
{ filter_upwards [eventually_ge_of_tendsto_gt hl h],
intros n hn hc,
rw [hc, div_zero] at hn,
linarith },
rcases exists_between hl with ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁⟩,
refine not_summable_of_ratio_norm_eventually_ge hr₀ key.frequently _,
filter_upwards [eventually_ge_of_tendsto_gt hr₁ h, key],
intros n h₀ h₁,
rwa ← le_div_iff (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) h₁.symm)
end
/-- A series whose terms are bounded by the terms of a converging geometric series converges. -/
lemma summable_one_div_pow_of_le {m : ℝ} {f : ℕ → ℕ} (hm : 1 < m) (fi : ∀ i, i ≤ f i) :
summable (λ i, 1 / m ^ f i) :=
begin
refine summable_of_nonneg_of_le
(λ a, one_div_nonneg.mpr (pow_nonneg (zero_le_one.trans hm.le) _)) (λ a, _)
(summable_geometric_of_lt_1 (one_div_nonneg.mpr (zero_le_one.trans hm.le))
((one_div_lt (zero_lt_one.trans hm) zero_lt_one).mpr (one_div_one.le.trans_lt hm))),
rw [div_pow, one_pow],
refine (one_div_le_one_div _ _).mpr (pow_le_pow hm.le (fi a));
exact pow_pos (zero_lt_one.trans hm) _
end
/-! ### Positive sequences with small sums on encodable types -/
/-- For any positive `ε`, define on an encodable type a positive sequence with sum less than `ε` -/
def pos_sum_of_encodable {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε)
(ι) [encodable ι] : {ε' : ι → ℝ // (∀ i, 0 < ε' i) ∧ ∃ c, has_sum ε' c ∧ c ≤ ε} :=
begin
let f := λ n, (ε / 2) / 2 ^ n,
have hf : has_sum f ε := has_sum_geometric_two' _,
have f0 : ∀ n, 0 < f n := λ n, div_pos (half_pos hε) (pow_pos zero_lt_two _),
refine ⟨f ∘ encodable.encode, λ i, f0 _, _⟩,
rcases hf.summable.comp_injective (@encodable.encode_injective ι _) with ⟨c, hg⟩,
refine ⟨c, hg, has_sum_le_inj _ (@encodable.encode_injective ι _) _ _ hg hf⟩,
{ assume i _, exact le_of_lt (f0 _) },
{ assume n, exact le_refl _ }
end
lemma set.countable.exists_pos_has_sum_le {ι : Type*} {s : set ι} (hs : s.countable)
{ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ ε' : ι → ℝ, (∀ i, 0 < ε' i) ∧ ∃ c, has_sum (λ i : s, ε' i) c ∧ c ≤ ε :=
begin
haveI := hs.to_encodable,
rcases pos_sum_of_encodable hε s with ⟨f, hf0, ⟨c, hfc, hcε⟩⟩,
refine ⟨λ i, if h : i ∈ s then f ⟨i, h⟩ else 1, λ i, _, ⟨c, _, hcε⟩⟩,
{ split_ifs, exacts [hf0 _, zero_lt_one] },
{ simpa only [subtype.coe_prop, dif_pos, subtype.coe_eta] }
end
lemma set.countable.exists_pos_forall_sum_le {ι : Type*} {s : set ι} (hs : s.countable)
{ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ ε' : ι → ℝ, (∀ i, 0 < ε' i) ∧ ∀ t : finset ι, ↑t ⊆ s → ∑ i in t, ε' i ≤ ε :=
begin
rcases hs.exists_pos_has_sum_le hε with ⟨ε', hpos, c, hε'c, hcε⟩,
refine ⟨ε', hpos, λ t ht, _⟩,
rw [← sum_subtype_of_mem _ ht],
refine (sum_le_has_sum _ _ hε'c).trans hcε,
exact λ _ _, (hpos _).le
end
namespace nnreal
theorem exists_pos_sum_of_encodable {ε : ℝ≥0} (hε : ε ≠ 0) (ι) [encodable ι] :
∃ ε' : ι → ℝ≥0, (∀ i, 0 < ε' i) ∧ ∃c, has_sum ε' c ∧ c < ε :=
let ⟨a, a0, aε⟩ := exists_between (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hε) in
let ⟨ε', hε', c, hc, hcε⟩ := pos_sum_of_encodable a0 ι in
⟨ λi, ⟨ε' i, le_of_lt $ hε' i⟩, assume i, nnreal.coe_lt_coe.2 $ hε' i,
⟨c, has_sum_le (assume i, le_of_lt $ hε' i) has_sum_zero hc ⟩, nnreal.has_sum_coe.1 hc,
lt_of_le_of_lt (nnreal.coe_le_coe.1 hcε) aε ⟩
end nnreal
namespace ennreal
theorem exists_pos_sum_of_encodable {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) (ι) [encodable ι] :
∃ ε' : ι → ℝ≥0, (∀ i, 0 < ε' i) ∧ ∑' i, (ε' i : ℝ≥0∞) < ε :=
begin
rcases exists_between (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hε) with ⟨r, h0r, hrε⟩,
rcases lt_iff_exists_coe.1 hrε with ⟨x, rfl, hx⟩,
rcases nnreal.exists_pos_sum_of_encodable (coe_pos.1 h0r).ne' ι with ⟨ε', hp, c, hc, hcr⟩,
exact ⟨ε', hp, (ennreal.tsum_coe_eq hc).symm ▸ lt_trans (coe_lt_coe.2 hcr) hrε⟩
end
theorem exists_pos_sum_of_encodable' {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) (ι) [encodable ι] :
∃ ε' : ι → ℝ≥0∞, (∀ i, 0 < ε' i) ∧ (∑' i, ε' i) < ε :=
let ⟨δ, δpos, hδ⟩ := exists_pos_sum_of_encodable hε ι in
⟨λ i, δ i, λ i, ennreal.coe_pos.2 (δpos i), hδ⟩
theorem exists_pos_tsum_mul_lt_of_encodable {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) {ι} [encodable ι]
(w : ι → ℝ≥0∞) (hw : ∀ i, w i ≠ ∞) :
∃ δ : ι → ℝ≥0, (∀ i, 0 < δ i) ∧ ∑' i, (w i * δ i : ℝ≥0∞) < ε :=
begin
lift w to ι → ℝ≥0 using hw,
rcases exists_pos_sum_of_encodable hε ι with ⟨δ', Hpos, Hsum⟩,
have : ∀ i, 0 < max 1 (w i), from λ i, zero_lt_one.trans_le (le_max_left _ _),
refine ⟨λ i, δ' i / max 1 (w i), λ i, nnreal.div_pos (Hpos _) (this i), _⟩,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (ennreal.tsum_le_tsum $ λ i, _) Hsum,
rw [coe_div (this i).ne'],
refine mul_le_of_le_div' (ennreal.mul_le_mul le_rfl $ ennreal.inv_le_inv.2 _),
exact coe_le_coe.2 (le_max_right _ _)
end
end ennreal
/-!
### Factorial
-/
lemma factorial_tendsto_at_top : tendsto nat.factorial at_top at_top :=
tendsto_at_top_at_top_of_monotone nat.monotone_factorial (λ n, ⟨n, n.self_le_factorial⟩)
lemma tendsto_factorial_div_pow_self_at_top : tendsto (λ n, n! / n^n : ℕ → ℝ) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le'
tendsto_const_nhds
(tendsto_const_div_at_top_nhds_0_nat 1)
(eventually_of_forall $ λ n, div_nonneg (by exact_mod_cast n.factorial_pos.le)
(pow_nonneg (by exact_mod_cast n.zero_le) _))
begin
refine (eventually_gt_at_top 0).mono (λ n hn, _),
rcases nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hn.ne.symm with ⟨k, rfl⟩,
rw [← prod_range_add_one_eq_factorial, pow_eq_prod_const, div_eq_mul_inv, ← inv_eq_one_div,
prod_nat_cast, nat.cast_succ, ← prod_inv_distrib', ← prod_mul_distrib,
finset.prod_range_succ'],
simp only [prod_range_succ', one_mul, nat.cast_add, zero_add, nat.cast_one],
refine mul_le_of_le_one_left (inv_nonneg.mpr $ by exact_mod_cast hn.le) (prod_le_one _ _);
intros x hx; rw finset.mem_range at hx,
{ refine mul_nonneg _ (inv_nonneg.mpr _); norm_cast; linarith },
{ refine (div_le_one $ by exact_mod_cast hn).mpr _, norm_cast, linarith }
end
/-- The series `∑' n, x ^ n / n!` is summable of any `x : ℝ`. See also `exp_series_field_summable`
for a version that also works in `ℂ`, and `exp_series_summable'` for a version that works in
any normed algebra over `ℝ` or `ℂ`. -/
lemma real.summable_pow_div_factorial (x : ℝ) :
summable (λ n, x ^ n / n! : ℕ → ℝ) :=
begin
-- We start with trivial extimates
have A : (0 : ℝ) < ⌊∥x∥⌋₊ + 1, from zero_lt_one.trans_le (by simp),
have B : ∥x∥ / (⌊∥x∥⌋₊ + 1) < 1, from (div_lt_one A).2 (nat.lt_floor_add_one _),
-- Then we apply the ratio test. The estimate works for `n ≥ ⌊∥x∥⌋₊`.
suffices : ∀ n ≥ ⌊∥x∥⌋₊, ∥x ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1)!∥ ≤ ∥x∥ / (⌊∥x∥⌋₊ + 1) * ∥x ^ n / ↑n!∥,
from summable_of_ratio_norm_eventually_le B (eventually_at_top.2 ⟨⌊∥x∥⌋₊, this⟩),
-- Finally, we prove the upper estimate
intros n hn,
calc ∥x ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1)!∥ = (∥x∥ / (n + 1)) * ∥x ^ n / n!∥ :
by rw [pow_succ, nat.factorial_succ, nat.cast_mul, ← div_mul_div,
normed_field.norm_mul, normed_field.norm_div, real.norm_coe_nat, nat.cast_succ]
... ≤ (∥x∥ / (⌊∥x∥⌋₊ + 1)) * ∥x ^ n / n!∥ :
by mono* with [0 ≤ ∥x ^ n / n!∥, 0 ≤ ∥x∥]; apply norm_nonneg
end
lemma real.tendsto_pow_div_factorial_at_top (x : ℝ) :
tendsto (λ n, x ^ n / n! : ℕ → ℝ) at_top (𝓝 0) :=
(real.summable_pow_div_factorial x).tendsto_at_top_zero
/-!
### Ceil and floor
-/
section
variables {R : Type*} [topological_space R] [linear_ordered_field R] [order_topology R]
[floor_ring R]
lemma tendsto_nat_floor_mul_div_at_top {a : R} (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
tendsto (λ x, (⌊a * x⌋₊ : R) / x) at_top (𝓝 a) :=
begin
have A : tendsto (λ (x : R), a - x⁻¹) at_top (𝓝 (a - 0)) :=
tendsto_const_nhds.sub tendsto_inv_at_top_zero,
rw sub_zero at A,
apply tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' A tendsto_const_nhds,
{ refine eventually_at_top.2 ⟨1, λ x hx, _⟩,
simp only [le_div_iff (zero_lt_one.trans_le hx), sub_mul,
inv_mul_cancel (zero_lt_one.trans_le hx).ne'],
have := nat.lt_floor_add_one (a * x),
linarith },
{ refine eventually_at_top.2 ⟨1, λ x hx, _⟩,
rw div_le_iff (zero_lt_one.trans_le hx),
simp [nat.floor_le (mul_nonneg ha (zero_le_one.trans hx))] }
end
lemma tendsto_nat_ceil_mul_div_at_top {a : R} (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
tendsto (λ x, (⌈a * x⌉₊ : R) / x) at_top (𝓝 a) :=
begin
have A : tendsto (λ (x : R), a + x⁻¹) at_top (𝓝 (a + 0)) :=
tendsto_const_nhds.add tendsto_inv_at_top_zero,
rw add_zero at A,
apply tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le' tendsto_const_nhds A,
{ refine eventually_at_top.2 ⟨1, λ x hx, _⟩,
rw le_div_iff (zero_lt_one.trans_le hx),
exact nat.le_ceil _ },
{ refine eventually_at_top.2 ⟨1, λ x hx, _⟩,
simp [div_le_iff (zero_lt_one.trans_le hx), inv_mul_cancel (zero_lt_one.trans_le hx).ne',
(nat.ceil_lt_add_one ((mul_nonneg ha (zero_le_one.trans hx)))).le, add_mul] }
end
end
|
bc2cdde5309da19bc6db0b031cdb0f5218fb9bcd | 63abd62053d479eae5abf4951554e1064a4c45b4 | /src/data/multiset/fold.lean | d19fd144d8bae13604e02a00572dec2e00e2f4fb | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Lix0120/mathlib | 0020745240315ed0e517cbf32e738d8f9811dd80 | e14c37827456fc6707f31b4d1d16f1f3a3205e91 | refs/heads/master | 1,673,102,855,024 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 1,604,151,044,000 | 308,930,245 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,604,164,710,000 | 1,604,163,547,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 3,787 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Mario Carneiro
-/
import data.multiset.erase_dup
/-!
# The fold operation for a commutative associative operation over a multiset.
-/
namespace multiset
variables {α β : Type*}
/-! ### fold -/
section fold
variables (op : α → α → α) [hc : is_commutative α op] [ha : is_associative α op]
local notation a * b := op a b
include hc ha
/-- `fold op b s` folds a commutative associative operation `op` over
the multiset `s`. -/
def fold : α → multiset α → α := foldr op (left_comm _ hc.comm ha.assoc)
theorem fold_eq_foldr (b : α) (s : multiset α) : fold op b s = foldr op (left_comm _ hc.comm ha.assoc) b s := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_fold_r (b : α) (l : list α) : fold op b l = l.foldr op b := rfl
theorem coe_fold_l (b : α) (l : list α) : fold op b l = l.foldl op b :=
(coe_foldr_swap op _ b l).trans $ by simp [hc.comm]
theorem fold_eq_foldl (b : α) (s : multiset α) : fold op b s = foldl op (right_comm _ hc.comm ha.assoc) b s :=
quot.induction_on s $ λ l, coe_fold_l _ _ _
@[simp] theorem fold_zero (b : α) : (0 : multiset α).fold op b = b := rfl
@[simp] theorem fold_cons_left : ∀ (b a : α) (s : multiset α),
(a ::ₘ s).fold op b = a * s.fold op b := foldr_cons _ _
theorem fold_cons_right (b a : α) (s : multiset α) : (a ::ₘ s).fold op b = s.fold op b * a :=
by simp [hc.comm]
theorem fold_cons'_right (b a : α) (s : multiset α) : (a ::ₘ s).fold op b = s.fold op (b * a) :=
by rw [fold_eq_foldl, foldl_cons, ← fold_eq_foldl]
theorem fold_cons'_left (b a : α) (s : multiset α) : (a ::ₘ s).fold op b = s.fold op (a * b) :=
by rw [fold_cons'_right, hc.comm]
theorem fold_add (b₁ b₂ : α) (s₁ s₂ : multiset α) : (s₁ + s₂).fold op (b₁ * b₂) = s₁.fold op b₁ * s₂.fold op b₂ :=
multiset.induction_on s₂
(by rw [add_zero, fold_zero, ← fold_cons'_right, ← fold_cons_right op])
(by simp {contextual := tt}; cc)
theorem fold_singleton (b a : α) : (a ::ₘ 0 : multiset α).fold op b = a * b := by simp
theorem fold_distrib {f g : β → α} (u₁ u₂ : α) (s : multiset β) :
(s.map (λx, f x * g x)).fold op (u₁ * u₂) = (s.map f).fold op u₁ * (s.map g).fold op u₂ :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp) (by simp {contextual := tt}; cc)
theorem fold_hom {op' : β → β → β} [is_commutative β op'] [is_associative β op']
{m : α → β} (hm : ∀x y, m (op x y) = op' (m x) (m y)) (b : α) (s : multiset α) :
(s.map m).fold op' (m b) = m (s.fold op b) :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp) (by simp [hm] {contextual := tt})
theorem fold_union_inter [decidable_eq α] (s₁ s₂ : multiset α) (b₁ b₂ : α) :
(s₁ ∪ s₂).fold op b₁ * (s₁ ∩ s₂).fold op b₂ = s₁.fold op b₁ * s₂.fold op b₂ :=
by rw [← fold_add op, union_add_inter, fold_add op]
@[simp] theorem fold_erase_dup_idem [decidable_eq α] [hi : is_idempotent α op] (s : multiset α) (b : α) :
(erase_dup s).fold op b = s.fold op b :=
multiset.induction_on s (by simp) $ λ a s IH, begin
by_cases a ∈ s; simp [IH, h],
show fold op b s = op a (fold op b s),
rw [← cons_erase h, fold_cons_left, ← ha.assoc, hi.idempotent],
end
end fold
open nat
theorem le_smul_erase_dup [decidable_eq α] (s : multiset α) :
∃ n : ℕ, s ≤ n •ℕ erase_dup s :=
⟨(s.map (λ a, count a s)).fold max 0, le_iff_count.2 $ λ a, begin
rw count_smul, by_cases a ∈ s,
{ refine le_trans _ (mul_le_mul_left _ $ count_pos.2 $ mem_erase_dup.2 h),
have : count a s ≤ fold max 0 (map (λ a, count a s) (a ::ₘ erase s a));
[simp [le_max_left], simpa [cons_erase h]] },
{ simp [count_eq_zero.2 h, nat.zero_le] }
end⟩
end multiset
|
fc87690eaf2d32483d2d95b98c5fb1a8b336bc6a | ce6917c5bacabee346655160b74a307b4a5ab620 | /src/ch5/ex0607.lean | fca48faf3acb666a2ed20e79e0178c3dc7baf456 | [] | no_license | Ailrun/Theorem_Proving_in_Lean | ae6a23f3c54d62d401314d6a771e8ff8b4132db2 | 2eb1b5caf93c6a5a555c79e9097cf2ba5a66cf68 | refs/heads/master | 1,609,838,270,467 | 1,586,846,743,000 | 1,586,846,743,000 | 240,967,761 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 210 | lean | universe u
def tuple (α : Type u) (n : ℕ) :=
{ l : list α // list.length l = n }
variables {α : Type u} {n : ℕ}
example (h : n = 0) (t : tuple α n) : tuple α 0 :=
begin
rw h at t,
exact t
end
|
4b42e09ebfd9c6faefb79c985e3049d4bc27c1b8 | efa51dd2edbbbbd6c34bd0ce436415eb405832e7 | /20170116_POPL/assoc/builtin_ac.lean | 0aba69b6a8ff5c9f8316486845cd86b9b23d122a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover/presentations | dd031a05bcb12c8855676c77e52ed84246bd889a | 3ce2d132d299409f1de269fa8e95afa1333d644e | refs/heads/master | 1,688,703,388,796 | 1,686,838,383,000 | 1,687,465,742,000 | 29,750,158 | 12 | 9 | Apache-2.0 | 1,540,211,670,000 | 1,422,042,683,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 813 | lean | /-
Lean has a tactic (cc) that performs congruence closure modulo associativity and commutativity.
However, in this unit, we will not focus on it, but on how to implement our own tactics.
In the remaining files in this unit, we will construct a tactic that "flats" nested applications
of associated operators.
-/
import data.set
example (a b c d : nat) : a + b + c + d = c + a + b + d :=
by cc
example (s₁ s₂ s₃ s₄ : set nat) : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ∪ (s₃ ∪ s₄) = s₁ ∪ (s₂ ∪ (s₃ ∪ s₄)) :=
by cc
example {α : Type} (s₁ s₂ s₃ s₄ : set α) : s₁ ∪ s₂ ∪ s₃ ∪ s₄ = (s₄ ∪ s₁) ∪ (s₂ ∪ s₃) :=
by cc
example {α : Type} (s₁ s₂ s₃ s₄ t r : set α) : (t = s₁ ∪ s₂) → (r = s₂ ∪ s₃) → t ∪ s₃ ∪ s₄ = (s₄ ∪ s₁) ∪ r :=
by cc
|
22c4b9b2b60a24f80c5f45cc18444c5acfce6d7a | a721fe7446524f18ba361625fc01033d9c8b7a78 | /src/principia/myrat/frac.lean | 751236f0badd511b43f540ad2122d056e65c6f4e | [] | no_license | Sterrs/leaning | 8fd80d1f0a6117a220bb2e57ece639b9a63deadc | 3901cc953694b33adda86cb88ca30ba99594db31 | refs/heads/master | 1,627,023,822,744 | 1,616,515,221,000 | 1,616,515,221,000 | 245,512,190 | 2 | 0 | null | 1,616,429,050,000 | 1,583,527,118,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,039 | lean | import ..myint.le
namespace hidden
open myint
open myring
open ordered_myring
open ordered_integral_domain
structure frac :=
-- Numerator
(num : myint)
-- Denominator
(denom : myint)
-- Proof that the denominator is positive
(denom_pos : 0 < denom)
namespace frac
variables {x y z : frac}
theorem num_and_denom_eq : x = y ↔ x.num = y.num ∧ x.denom = y.denom :=
begin
split; assume h, {
split; rw h,
}, {
cases x,
cases y,
cc,
},
end
def frac_eq (x y: frac): Prop :=
x.num * y.denom = y.num * x.denom
private theorem frac_eq_refl: reflexive frac_eq :=
begin
intro x,
unfold frac_eq,
end
private theorem frac_eq_symm: symmetric frac_eq :=
begin
intros x y,
assume h,
from h.symm,
end
private theorem frac_eq_trans: transitive frac_eq :=
begin
intros x y z,
assume hxy hyz,
unfold frac_eq at hxy hyz,
unfold frac_eq,
have h := congr_arg (λ x : myint, x * z.denom) hxy,
dsimp only [] at h,
rw [mul_assoc y.num, mul_comm x.denom, ←mul_assoc y.num, hyz] at h,
suffices : y.denom * (x.num * z.denom) = y.denom * (z.num * x.denom),
from integral_domain.mul_cancel_left _ _ _ (lt_impl_ne y.denom_pos).symm this,
rw [←mul_assoc, mul_comm y.denom, h],
ac_refl,
end
instance frac.setoid : setoid frac :=
⟨frac_eq, ⟨frac_eq_refl, frac_eq_symm, frac_eq_trans⟩⟩
theorem setoid_equiv (x y : frac) :
x ≈ y ↔ x.num * y.denom = y.num * x.denom := iff.rfl
theorem sound_exact_iff (x y: frac):
⟦x⟧ = ⟦y⟧ ↔ x ≈ y := iff.intro quotient.exact quotient.sound
instance decidable_frac_eq: ∀ a b: frac, decidable (a ≈ b) :=
begin
intros a b,
rw setoid_equiv,
from myint.decidable_eq _ _,
end
def neg (x : frac) : frac :=
⟨-x.num, x.denom, x.denom_pos⟩
instance: has_neg frac := ⟨neg⟩
theorem neg_num {x : frac} :
(-x).num = -x.num := rfl
theorem neg_denom {x : frac} :
(-x).denom = x.denom := rfl
theorem frac_neg_neg {x: frac}: -x = neg x := rfl
theorem neg_well_defined (x y : frac) :
x ≈ y → ⟦-x⟧ = ⟦-y⟧ :=
begin
assume h,
apply quotient.sound,
rw setoid_equiv,
repeat { rw neg_num <|> rw neg_denom <|> rw neg_mul },
rw ←neg_eq,
rwa ←setoid_equiv,
end
def add (x y: frac) : frac :=
⟨x.num * y.denom + y.num * x.denom, x.denom * y.denom,
by from zero_lt_mul x.denom_pos y.denom_pos⟩
instance: has_add frac := ⟨add⟩
theorem frac_add_add (x y: frac): add x y = x + y := rfl
theorem add_num {x y : frac} :
(x + y).num = x.num * y.denom + y.num * x.denom := rfl
theorem add_denom {x y : frac} :
(x + y).denom = x.denom * y.denom := rfl
theorem add_well_defined (a x b y : frac) :
a ≈ b → x ≈ y → ⟦a + x⟧ = ⟦b + y⟧ :=
begin
assume hab hxy,
rw frac.setoid_equiv at hab hxy,
apply quotient.sound,
rw [setoid_equiv, add_num, add_num, add_denom, add_denom,
add_mul, add_mul],
-- State what we want ac_refl to do, then do it and rewrite
have h₁ : x.num * a.denom * (b.denom * y.denom) =
x.num * y.denom * a.denom * b.denom,
ac_refl,
rw [h₁, hxy],
have h₂ : a.num * x.denom * (b.denom * y.denom) =
a.num * b.denom * x.denom * y.denom,
ac_refl,
rw [h₂, hab],
ac_refl,
end
def mul (x y : frac) : frac :=
⟨x.num * y.num, x.denom * y.denom,
by from zero_lt_mul x.denom_pos y.denom_pos⟩
instance: has_mul frac := ⟨mul⟩
theorem mul_num {x y : frac} :
(x * y).num = x.num * y.num := rfl
theorem mul_denom {x y : frac} :
(x * y).denom = x.denom * y.denom := rfl
theorem mul_well_defined (a x b y : frac) :
a ≈ b → x ≈ y → ⟦a * x⟧ = ⟦b * y⟧ :=
begin
assume hab hxy,
rw setoid_equiv at hab hxy,
apply quotient.sound,
rw [setoid_equiv, mul_num, mul_num, mul_denom, mul_denom],
-- State what we want ac_refl to do, then do it and rewrite
have h₁ : a.num * x.num * (b.denom * y.denom) =
x.num * y.denom * a.num * b.denom,
ac_refl,
rw [h₁, hxy],
have h₂ : b.num * y.num * (a.denom * x.denom) =
b.num * a.denom * x.denom * y.num,
ac_refl,
rw [h₂, ←hab],
ac_refl,
end
private lemma one_pos: (0: myint) < 1 := nontrivial_zero_lt_one myint.nontrivial
-- Reciprocal of zero is zero
-- This has to be an if, because 0 is a different case
def inv (x: frac): frac :=
if h : x.num = 0 then ⟨0, 1, one_pos⟩ else
⟨(sign x.num) * x.denom, (sign x.num) * x.num,
zero_lt_sign_mul_self _ h⟩
instance: has_inv frac := ⟨inv⟩
private theorem inv_ite {x : frac} : x⁻¹ = dite (x.num = 0) (λ (h : x.num = 0), ⟨0, 1, one_pos⟩)
(λ (h : ¬x.num = 0),⟨(sign x.num) * x.denom, (sign x.num) * x.num, zero_lt_sign_mul_self _ h⟩)
:= rfl
theorem inv_zero {x : frac} (h : x.num = 0) : x⁻¹ = ⟨0, 1, one_pos⟩ :=
by rw [inv_ite, dif_pos h]
theorem inv_num_nonzero {x : frac} (h : x.num ≠ 0) :
x⁻¹.num = (sign x.num) * x.denom :=
by rw [inv_ite, dif_neg h]
theorem inv_denom_nonzero {x : frac} (h : x.num ≠ 0) :
x⁻¹.denom = (sign x.num) * x.num :=
by rw [inv_ite, dif_neg h]
theorem inv_well_defined (x y : frac) :
x ≈ y → ⟦x⁻¹⟧ = ⟦y⁻¹⟧ :=
begin
assume hxy,
rw setoid_equiv at hxy,
apply quotient.sound,
rw setoid_equiv,
by_cases x.num = 0, {
rw [h, zero_mul] at hxy,
have hzero := integral_domain.mul_integral hxy.symm,
cases hzero, {
rw [inv_zero h, inv_zero hzero],
}, {
exfalso, from (lt_impl_ne x.denom_pos) hzero.symm,
},
}, {
have hydn0 : y.denom ≠ 0,
from (lt_impl_ne y.denom_pos).symm,
have hlhsn0 : x.num * y.denom ≠ 0,
assume hz,
cases integral_domain.mul_integral hz; contradiction,
have : y.num ≠ 0,
rw hxy at hlhsn0,
assume hy0,
rw hy0 at hlhsn0,
rw zero_mul at hlhsn0,
contradiction,
rw [inv_denom_nonzero h, inv_num_nonzero h],
rw [inv_denom_nonzero this, inv_num_nonzero this],
have h₁ : sign x.num * x.denom * (sign y.num * y.num) =
sign x.num * sign y.num * (y.num * x.denom),
ac_refl,
rw [h₁, ←hxy],
ac_refl,
},
end
end frac
end hidden
|
7b246375a0bf56eba0d59d3d1e40f3968d96db7c | 05f637fa14ac28031cb1ea92086a0f4eb23ff2b1 | /tests/lean/tactic3.lean | 713fcd092bfca11d045f4c05bcef40641dadfecf | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | codyroux/lean0.1 | 1ce92751d664aacff0529e139083304a7bbc8a71 | 0dc6fb974aa85ed6f305a2f4b10a53a44ee5f0ef | refs/heads/master | 1,610,830,535,062 | 1,402,150,480,000 | 1,402,150,480,000 | 19,588,851 | 2 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 256 | lean | (* import("tactic.lua") *)
variables p q r : Bool
theorem T1 : p → p /\ q → r → q /\ r /\ p := _.
(* Repeat(OrElse(conj_tac(), conj_hyp_tac(), assumption_tac())) *)
done
-- Display proof term generated by previous tactic
print environment 1 |
6c11c4ca2fa53c4ac93c925e969c2201a02ebb1f | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/algebra/category/Module/monoidal/symmetric.lean | 177cae80fa58d23da2f761fd7df51609b262ff82 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,284 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard, Scott Morrison, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import category_theory.monoidal.braided
import algebra.category.Module.monoidal.basic
/-!
# The symmetric monoidal structure on `Module R`.
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
-/
universes v w x u
open category_theory
namespace Module
variables {R : Type u} [comm_ring R]
/-- (implementation) the braiding for R-modules -/
def braiding (M N : Module.{u} R) : (M ⊗ N) ≅ (N ⊗ M) :=
linear_equiv.to_Module_iso (tensor_product.comm R M N)
namespace monoidal_category
@[simp] lemma braiding_naturality {X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ : Module.{u} R} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
(f ⊗ g) ≫ (Y₁.braiding Y₂).hom =
(X₁.braiding X₂).hom ≫ (g ⊗ f) :=
begin
apply tensor_product.ext',
intros x y,
refl
end
@[simp] lemma hexagon_forward (X Y Z : Module.{u} R) :
(α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (braiding X _).hom ≫ (α_ Y Z X).hom =
((braiding X Y).hom ⊗ 𝟙 Z) ≫ (α_ Y X Z).hom ≫ (𝟙 Y ⊗ (braiding X Z).hom) :=
begin
apply tensor_product.ext_threefold,
intros x y z,
refl,
end
@[simp] lemma hexagon_reverse (X Y Z : Module.{u} R) :
(α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (braiding _ Z).hom ≫ (α_ Z X Y).inv =
(𝟙 X ⊗ (Y.braiding Z).hom) ≫ (α_ X Z Y).inv ≫ ((X.braiding Z).hom ⊗ 𝟙 Y) :=
begin
apply (cancel_epi (α_ X Y Z).hom).1,
apply tensor_product.ext_threefold,
intros x y z,
refl,
end
local attribute [ext] tensor_product.ext
/-- The symmetric monoidal structure on `Module R`. -/
instance symmetric_category : symmetric_category (Module.{u} R) :=
{ braiding := braiding,
braiding_naturality' := λ X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ f g, braiding_naturality f g,
hexagon_forward' := hexagon_forward,
hexagon_reverse' := hexagon_reverse, }
@[simp] lemma braiding_hom_apply {M N : Module.{u} R} (m : M) (n : N) :
((β_ M N).hom : M ⊗ N ⟶ N ⊗ M) (m ⊗ₜ n) = n ⊗ₜ m := rfl
@[simp] lemma braiding_inv_apply {M N : Module.{u} R} (m : M) (n : N) :
((β_ M N).inv : N ⊗ M ⟶ M ⊗ N) (n ⊗ₜ m) = m ⊗ₜ n := rfl
end monoidal_category
end Module
|
a118cf039ec031fe0522ac63e44c7ea0c3e2cce3 | 55c7fc2bf55d496ace18cd6f3376e12bb14c8cc5 | /src/tactic/norm_cast.lean | 720e06dfe9f0bb8324cc58c16500e403c380c616 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | dupuisf/mathlib | 62de4ec6544bf3b79086afd27b6529acfaf2c1bb | 8582b06b0a5d06c33ee07d0bdf7c646cae22cf36 | refs/heads/master | 1,669,494,854,016 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 1,595,692,409,000 | 272,046,630 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,592,066,143,000 | 1,592,066,142,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 26,170 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Paul-Nicolas Madelaine. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Paul-Nicolas Madelaine, Robert Y. Lewis
Normalizing casts inside expressions.
-/
import tactic.converter.interactive
import tactic.hint
/-!
# A tactic for normalizing casts inside expressions
This tactic normalizes casts inside expressions.
It can be thought of as a call to the simplifier with a specific set of lemmas to
move casts upwards in the expression.
It has special handling of numerals and a simple heuristic to help moving
casts "past" binary operators.
Contrary to simp, it should be safe to use as a non-terminating tactic.
The algorithm implemented here is described in the paper
<https://lean-forward.github.io/norm_cast/norm_cast.pdf>.
## Important definitions
* `tactic.interactive.norm_cast`
* `tactic.interactive.push_cast`
* `tactic.interactive.exact_mod_cast`
* `tactic.interactive.apply_mod_cast`
* `tactic.interactive.rw_mod_cast`
* `tactic.interactive.assumption_mod_cast`
-/
setup_tactic_parser
namespace tactic
/--
Runs `mk_instance` with a time limit.
This is a work around to the fact that in some cases
mk_instance times out instead of failing,
for example: `has_lift_t ℤ ℕ`
`mk_instance_fast` is used when we assume the type class search
should end instantly.
-/
meta def mk_instance_fast (e : expr) (timeout := 1000) : tactic expr :=
try_for timeout (mk_instance e)
end tactic
namespace norm_cast
open tactic expr
declare_trace norm_cast
/--
Output a trace message if `trace.norm_cast` is enabled.
-/
meta def trace_norm_cast {α} [has_to_tactic_format α] (msg : string) (a : α) : tactic unit :=
when_tracing `norm_cast $ do
a ← pp a,
trace ("[norm_cast] " ++ msg ++ a : format)
mk_simp_attribute push_cast "The `push_cast` simp attribute uses `norm_cast` lemmas
to move casts toward the leaf nodes of the expression."
/--
`label` is a type used to classify `norm_cast` lemmas.
* elim lemma: LHS has 0 head coes and ≥ 1 internal coe
* move lemma: LHS has 1 head coe and 0 internal coes, RHS has 0 head coes and ≥ 1 internal coes
* squash lemma: LHS has ≥ 1 head coes and 0 internal coes, RHS has fewer head coes
-/
@[derive [decidable_eq, has_reflect, inhabited]]
inductive label
| elim : label
| move : label
| squash : label
namespace label
/-- Convert `label` into `string`. -/
protected def to_string : label → string
| elim := "elim"
| move := "move"
| squash := "squash"
instance : has_to_string label := ⟨label.to_string⟩
instance : has_repr label := ⟨label.to_string⟩
meta instance : has_to_format label := ⟨λ l, l.to_string⟩
/-- Convert `string` into `label`. -/
def of_string : string -> option label
| "elim" := some elim
| "move" := some move
| "squash" := some squash
| _ := none
end label
open label
/-- Count how many coercions are at the top of the expression. -/
meta def count_head_coes : expr → ℕ
| `(coe %%e) := count_head_coes e + 1
| `(coe_sort %%e) := count_head_coes e + 1
| `(coe_fn %%e) := count_head_coes e + 1
| _ := 0
/-- Count how many coercions are inside the expression, including the top ones. -/
meta def count_coes : expr → tactic ℕ
| `(coe %%e) := (+1) <$> count_coes e
| `(coe_sort %%e) := (+1) <$> count_coes e
| `(coe_fn %%e) := (+1) <$> count_coes e
| (app `(coe_fn %%e) x) := (+) <$> count_coes x <*> (+1) <$> count_coes e
| (expr.lam n bi t e) := do
l ← mk_local' n bi t,
count_coes $ e.instantiate_var l
| e := do
as ← e.get_simp_args,
list.sum <$> as.mmap count_coes
/-- Count how many coercions are inside the expression, excluding the top ones. -/
private meta def count_internal_coes (e : expr) : tactic ℕ := do
ncoes ← count_coes e,
pure $ ncoes - count_head_coes e
/--
Classifies a declaration of type `ty` as a `norm_cast` rule.
-/
meta def classify_type (ty : expr) : tactic label := do
(_, ty) ← mk_local_pis ty,
(lhs, rhs) ← match ty with
| `(%%lhs = %%rhs) := pure (lhs, rhs)
| `(%%lhs ↔ %%rhs) := pure (lhs, rhs)
| _ := fail "norm_cast: lemma must be = or ↔"
end,
lhs_coes ← count_coes lhs,
when (lhs_coes = 0) $ fail "norm_cast: badly shaped lemma, lhs must contain at least one coe",
let lhs_head_coes := count_head_coes lhs,
lhs_internal_coes ← count_internal_coes lhs,
let rhs_head_coes := count_head_coes rhs,
rhs_internal_coes ← count_internal_coes rhs,
if lhs_head_coes = 0 then
return elim
else if lhs_head_coes = 1 then do
when (rhs_head_coes ≠ 0) $ fail "norm_cast: badly shaped lemma, rhs can't start with coe",
if rhs_internal_coes = 0 then
return squash
else
return move
else if rhs_head_coes < lhs_head_coes then do
return squash
else do
fail "norm_cast: badly shaped shaped squash lemma, rhs must have fewer head coes than lhs"
/-- The cache for `norm_cast` attribute stores three `simp_lemma` objects. -/
meta structure norm_cast_cache :=
(up : simp_lemmas)
(down : simp_lemmas)
(squash : simp_lemmas)
/-- Empty `norm_cast_cache`. -/
meta def empty_cache : norm_cast_cache :=
{ up := simp_lemmas.mk,
down := simp_lemmas.mk,
squash := simp_lemmas.mk, }
meta instance : inhabited norm_cast_cache := ⟨empty_cache⟩
/-- `add_elim cache e` adds `e` as an `elim` lemma to `cache`. -/
meta def add_elim (cache : norm_cast_cache) (e : expr) : tactic norm_cast_cache :=
do
new_up ← simp_lemmas.add cache.up e,
return
{ up := new_up,
down := cache.down,
squash := cache.squash, }
/-- `add_move cache e` adds `e` as a `move` lemma to `cache`. -/
meta def add_move (cache : norm_cast_cache) (e : expr) : tactic norm_cast_cache :=
do
ty ← infer_type e,
new_up ← cache.up.add e tt,
new_down ← simp_lemmas.add cache.down e,
return {
up := new_up,
down := new_down,
squash := cache.squash, }
/-- `add_squash cache e` adds `e` as an `squash` lemma to `cache`. -/
meta def add_squash (cache : norm_cast_cache) (e : expr) : tactic norm_cast_cache :=
do
new_squash ← simp_lemmas.add cache.squash e,
new_down ← simp_lemmas.add cache.down e,
return {
up := cache.up,
down := new_down,
squash := new_squash, }
/--
The type of the `norm_cast` attribute.
The optional label is used to overwrite the classifier.
-/
meta def norm_cast_attr_ty : Type := user_attribute norm_cast_cache (option label)
/--
Efficient getter for the `@[norm_cast]` attribute parameter that does not call `eval_expr`.
See Note [user attribute parameters].
-/
meta def get_label_param (attr : norm_cast_attr_ty) (decl : name) : tactic (option label) := do
p ← attr.get_param_untyped decl,
match p with
| `(none) := pure none
| `(some label.elim) := pure label.elim
| `(some label.move) := pure label.move
| `(some label.squash) := pure label.squash
| _ := fail p
end
/--
`add_lemma cache decl` infers the proper `norm_cast` attribute for `decl` and adds it to `cache`.
-/
meta def add_lemma (attr : norm_cast_attr_ty) (cache : norm_cast_cache) (decl : name) :
tactic norm_cast_cache :=
do
e ← mk_const decl,
param ← get_label_param attr decl,
l ← param <|> (infer_type e >>= classify_type),
match l with
| elim := add_elim cache e
| move := add_move cache e
| squash := add_squash cache e
end
-- special lemmas to handle the ≥, > and ≠ operators
private lemma ge_from_le {α} [has_le α] : ∀ (x y : α), x ≥ y ↔ y ≤ x := λ _ _, iff.rfl
private lemma gt_from_lt {α} [has_lt α] : ∀ (x y : α), x > y ↔ y < x := λ _ _, iff.rfl
private lemma ne_from_not_eq {α} : ∀ (x y : α), x ≠ y ↔ ¬(x = y) := λ _ _, iff.rfl
/--
`mk_cache names` creates a `norm_cast_cache`. It infers the proper `norm_cast` attributes
for names in `names`, and collects the lemmas attributed with specific `norm_cast` attributes.
-/
meta def mk_cache (attr : thunk norm_cast_attr_ty) (names : list name) :
tactic norm_cast_cache := do
-- names has the declarations in reverse order
cache ← names.mfoldr (λ name cache, add_lemma (attr ()) cache name) empty_cache,
--some special lemmas to handle binary relations
let up := cache.up,
up ← up.add_simp ``ge_from_le,
up ← up.add_simp ``gt_from_lt,
up ← up.add_simp ``ne_from_not_eq,
let down := cache.down,
down ← down.add_simp ``coe_coe,
pure { up := up, down := down, squash := cache.squash }
/--
The `norm_cast` attribute.
-/
@[user_attribute] meta def norm_cast_attr : user_attribute norm_cast_cache (option label) :=
{ name := `norm_cast,
descr := "attribute for norm_cast",
parser :=
(do some l ← (label.of_string ∘ to_string) <$> ident, return l)
<|> return none,
after_set := some (λ decl prio persistent, do
param ← get_label_param norm_cast_attr decl,
match param with
| some l :=
when (l ≠ elim) $ simp_attr.push_cast.set decl () tt
| none := do
e ← mk_const decl,
ty ← infer_type e,
l ← classify_type ty,
norm_cast_attr.set decl l persistent prio
end),
before_unset := some $ λ _ _, tactic.skip,
cache_cfg := { mk_cache := mk_cache norm_cast_attr, dependencies := [] } }
/-- Classify a declaration as a `norm_cast` rule. -/
meta def make_guess (decl : name) : tactic label :=
do
e ← mk_const decl,
ty ← infer_type e,
classify_type ty
/--
Gets the `norm_cast` classification label for a declaration. Applies the
override specified on the attribute, if necessary.
-/
meta def get_label (decl : name) : tactic label :=
do
param ← get_label_param norm_cast_attr decl,
param <|> make_guess decl
end norm_cast
namespace tactic.interactive
open norm_cast
/--
`push_cast` rewrites the expression to move casts toward the leaf nodes.
For example, `↑(a + b)` will be written to `↑a + ↑b`.
Equivalent to `simp only with push_cast`.
Can also be used at hypotheses.
`push_cast` can also be used at hypotheses and with extra simp rules.
```lean
example (a b : ℕ) (h1 : ((a + b : ℕ) : ℤ) = 10) (h2 : ((a + b + 0 : ℕ) : ℤ) = 10) :
((a + b : ℕ) : ℤ) = 10 :=
begin
push_cast,
push_cast at h1,
push_cast [int.add_zero] at h2,
end
```
-/
meta def push_cast (hs : parse tactic.simp_arg_list) (l : parse location) : tactic unit :=
tactic.interactive.simp none tt hs [`push_cast] l
end tactic.interactive
namespace norm_cast
open tactic expr
/-- Prove `a = b` using the given simp set. -/
meta def prove_eq_using (s : simp_lemmas) (a b : expr) : tactic expr := do
(a', a_a') ← simplify s [] a {fail_if_unchanged := ff},
(b', b_b') ← simplify s [] b {fail_if_unchanged := ff},
on_exception (trace_norm_cast "failed: " (to_expr ``(%%a' = %%b') >>= pp)) $
is_def_eq a' b' reducible,
b'_b ← mk_eq_symm b_b',
mk_eq_trans a_a' b'_b
/-- Prove `a = b` by simplifying using move and squash lemmas. -/
meta def prove_eq_using_down (a b : expr) : tactic expr := do
cache ← norm_cast_attr.get_cache,
trace_norm_cast "proving: " (to_expr ``(%%a = %%b) >>= pp),
prove_eq_using cache.down a b
/--
This is the main heuristic used alongside the elim and move lemmas.
The goal is to help casts move past operators by adding intermediate casts.
An expression of the shape: op (↑(x : α) : γ) (↑(y : β) : γ)
is rewritten to: op (↑(↑(x : α) : β) : γ) (↑(y : β) : γ)
when (↑(↑(x : α) : β) : γ) = (↑(x : α) : γ) can be proven with a squash lemma
-/
meta def splitting_procedure : expr → tactic (expr × expr)
| (app (app op x) y) :=
(do
`(@coe %%α %%δ %%coe1 %%xx) ← return x,
`(@coe %%β %%γ %%coe2 %%yy) ← return y,
success_if_fail $ is_def_eq α β,
is_def_eq δ γ,
(do
coe3 ← mk_app `has_lift_t [α, β] >>= mk_instance_fast,
new_x ← to_expr ``(@coe %%β %%δ %%coe2 (@coe %%α %%β %%coe3 %%xx)),
let new_e := app (app op new_x) y,
eq_x ← prove_eq_using_down x new_x,
pr ← mk_congr_arg op eq_x,
pr ← mk_congr_fun pr y,
return (new_e, pr)
) <|> (do
coe3 ← mk_app `has_lift_t [β, α] >>= mk_instance_fast,
new_y ← to_expr ``(@coe %%α %%δ %%coe1 (@coe %%β %%α %%coe3 %%yy)),
let new_e := app (app op x) new_y,
eq_y ← prove_eq_using_down y new_y,
pr ← mk_congr_arg (app op x) eq_y,
return (new_e, pr)
)
) <|> (do
`(@coe %%α %%β %%coe1 %%xx) ← return x,
`(@has_one.one %%β %%h1) ← return y,
h2 ← to_expr ``(has_one %%α) >>= mk_instance_fast,
new_y ← to_expr ``(@coe %%α %%β %%coe1 (@has_one.one %%α %%h2)),
eq_y ← prove_eq_using_down y new_y,
let new_e := app (app op x) new_y,
pr ← mk_congr_arg (app op x) eq_y,
return (new_e, pr)
) <|> (do
`(@coe %%α %%β %%coe1 %%xx) ← return x,
`(@has_zero.zero %%β %%h1) ← return y,
h2 ← to_expr ``(has_zero %%α) >>= mk_instance_fast,
new_y ← to_expr ``(@coe %%α %%β %%coe1 (@has_zero.zero %%α %%h2)),
eq_y ← prove_eq_using_down y new_y,
let new_e := app (app op x) new_y,
pr ← mk_congr_arg (app op x) eq_y,
return (new_e, pr)
) <|> (do
`(@has_one.one %%β %%h1) ← return x,
`(@coe %%α %%β %%coe1 %%xx) ← return y,
h1 ← to_expr ``(has_one %%α) >>= mk_instance_fast,
new_x ← to_expr ``(@coe %%α %%β %%coe1 (@has_one.one %%α %%h1)),
eq_x ← prove_eq_using_down x new_x,
let new_e := app (app op new_x) y,
pr ← mk_congr_arg (lam `x binder_info.default β (app (app op (var 0)) y)) eq_x,
return (new_e, pr)
) <|> (do
`(@has_zero.zero %%β %%h1) ← return x,
`(@coe %%α %%β %%coe1 %%xx) ← return y,
h1 ← to_expr ``(has_zero %%α) >>= mk_instance_fast,
new_x ← to_expr ``(@coe %%α %%β %%coe1 (@has_zero.zero %%α %%h1)),
eq_x ← prove_eq_using_down x new_x,
let new_e := app (app op new_x) y,
pr ← mk_congr_arg (lam `x binder_info.default β (app (app op (var 0)) y)) eq_x,
return (new_e, pr)
)
| _ := failed
/--
Discharging function used during simplification in the "squash" step.
TODO: norm_cast takes a list of expressions to use as lemmas for the discharger
TODO: a tactic to print the results the discharger fails to proove
-/
private meta def prove : tactic unit :=
assumption
/--
Core rewriting function used in the "squash" step, which moves casts upwards
and eliminates them.
It tries to rewrite an expression using the elim and move lemmas.
On failure, it calls the splitting procedure heuristic.
-/
meta def upward_and_elim (s : simp_lemmas) (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
(do
r ← mcond (is_prop e) (return `iff) (return `eq),
(new_e, pr) ← s.rewrite e prove r,
pr ← match r with
| `iff := mk_app `propext [pr]
| _ := return pr
end,
return (new_e, pr)
) <|> splitting_procedure e
/-!
The following auxiliary functions are used to handle numerals.
-/
/--
If possible, rewrite `(n : α)` to `((n : ℕ) : α)` where `n` is a numeral and `α ≠ ℕ`.
Returns a pair of the new expression and proof that they are equal.
-/
meta def numeral_to_coe (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
do
α ← infer_type e,
success_if_fail $ is_def_eq α `(ℕ),
n ← e.to_nat,
h1 ← mk_app `has_lift_t [`(ℕ), α] >>= mk_instance_fast,
let new_e : expr := reflect n,
new_e ← to_expr ``(@coe ℕ %%α %%h1 %%new_e),
pr ← prove_eq_using_down e new_e,
return (new_e, pr)
/--
If possible, rewrite `((n : ℕ) : α)` to `(n : α)` where `n` is a numeral.
Returns a pair of the new expression and proof that they are equal.
-/
meta def coe_to_numeral (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
do
`(@coe ℕ %%α %%h1 %%e') ← return e,
n ← e'.to_nat,
-- replace e' by normalized numeral
is_def_eq (reflect n) e' reducible,
let e := e.app_fn (reflect n),
new_e ← expr.of_nat α n,
pr ← prove_eq_using_down e new_e,
return (new_e, pr)
/-- A local variant on `simplify_top_down`. -/
private meta def simplify_top_down' {α} (a : α) (pre : α → expr → tactic (α × expr × expr))
(e : expr) (cfg : simp_config := {}) : tactic (α × expr × expr) :=
ext_simplify_core a cfg simp_lemmas.mk (λ _, failed)
(λ a _ _ _ e, do
(new_a, new_e, pr) ← pre a e,
guard (¬ new_e =ₐ e),
return (new_a, new_e, some pr, ff))
(λ _ _ _ _ _, failed)
`eq e
/--
The core simplification routine of `norm_cast`.
-/
meta def derive (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
do
cache ← norm_cast_attr.get_cache,
e ← instantiate_mvars e,
let cfg : simp_config := {
zeta := ff,
beta := ff,
eta := ff,
proj := ff,
iota := ff,
iota_eqn := ff,
fail_if_unchanged := ff },
let e0 := e,
-- step 1: pre-processing of numerals
((), e1, pr1) ← simplify_top_down' () (λ _ e, prod.mk () <$> numeral_to_coe e) e0 cfg,
trace_norm_cast "after numeral_to_coe: " e1,
-- step 2: casts are moved upwards and eliminated
((), e2, pr2) ← simplify_bottom_up () (λ _ e, prod.mk () <$> upward_and_elim cache.up e) e1 cfg,
trace_norm_cast "after upward_and_elim: " e2,
-- step 3: casts are squashed
(e3, pr3) ← simplify cache.squash [] e2 cfg,
trace_norm_cast "after squashing: " e3,
-- step 4: post-processing of numerals
((), e4, pr4) ← simplify_top_down' () (λ _ e, prod.mk () <$> coe_to_numeral e) e3 cfg,
trace_norm_cast "after coe_to_numeral: " e4,
let new_e := e4,
guard (¬ new_e =ₐ e),
pr ← mk_eq_trans pr1 pr2,
pr ← mk_eq_trans pr pr3,
pr ← mk_eq_trans pr pr4,
return (new_e, pr)
/--
A small variant of `push_cast` suited for non-interactive use.
`derive_push_cast extra_lems e` returns an expression `e'` and a proof that `e = e'`.
-/
meta def derive_push_cast (extra_lems : list simp_arg_type) (e : expr) : tactic (expr × expr) :=
do (s, _) ← mk_simp_set tt [`push_cast] extra_lems,
simplify (s.erase [`int.coe_nat_succ]) [] e {fail_if_unchanged := ff}
end norm_cast
namespace tactic
open expr norm_cast
/-- `aux_mod_cast e` runs `norm_cast` on `e` and returns the result. If `include_goal` is true, it
also normalizes the goal. -/
meta def aux_mod_cast (e : expr) (include_goal : bool := tt) : tactic expr :=
match e with
| local_const _ lc _ _ := do
e ← get_local lc,
replace_at derive [e] include_goal,
get_local lc
| e := do
t ← infer_type e,
e ← assertv `this t e,
replace_at derive [e] include_goal,
get_local `this
end
/-- `exact_mod_cast e` runs `norm_cast` on the goal and `e`, and tries to use `e` to close the goal. -/
meta def exact_mod_cast (e : expr) : tactic unit :=
decorate_error "exact_mod_cast failed:" $ do
new_e ← aux_mod_cast e,
exact new_e
/-- `apply_mod_cast e` runs `norm_cast` on the goal and `e`, and tries to apply `e`. -/
meta def apply_mod_cast (e : expr) : tactic (list (name × expr)) :=
decorate_error "apply_mod_cast failed:" $ do
new_e ← aux_mod_cast e,
apply new_e
/-- `assumption_mod_cast` runs `norm_cast` on the goal. For each local hypothesis `h`, it also
normalizes `h` and tries to use that to close the goal. -/
meta def assumption_mod_cast : tactic unit :=
decorate_error "assumption_mod_cast failed:" $ do
let cfg : simp_config := {
fail_if_unchanged := ff,
canonize_instances := ff,
canonize_proofs := ff,
proj := ff
},
replace_at derive [] tt,
ctx ← local_context,
try_lst $ ctx.map (λ h, aux_mod_cast h ff >>= tactic.exact)
end tactic
namespace tactic.interactive
open tactic norm_cast
/--
Normalize casts at the given locations by moving them "upwards".
As opposed to simp, norm_cast can be used without necessarily closing the goal.
-/
meta def norm_cast (loc : parse location) : tactic unit :=
do
ns ← loc.get_locals,
tt ← replace_at derive ns loc.include_goal | fail "norm_cast failed to simplify",
when loc.include_goal $ try tactic.reflexivity,
when loc.include_goal $ try tactic.triv,
when (¬ ns.empty) $ try tactic.contradiction
/--
Rewrite with the given rules and normalize casts between steps.
-/
meta def rw_mod_cast (rs : parse rw_rules) (loc : parse location) : tactic unit :=
decorate_error "rw_mod_cast failed:" $ do
let cfg_norm : simp_config := {},
let cfg_rw : rewrite_cfg := {},
ns ← loc.get_locals,
monad.mapm' (λ r : rw_rule, do
save_info r.pos,
replace_at derive ns loc.include_goal,
rw ⟨[r], none⟩ loc {}
) rs.rules,
replace_at derive ns loc.include_goal,
skip
/--
Normalize the goal and the given expression, then close the goal with exact.
-/
meta def exact_mod_cast (e : parse texpr) : tactic unit :=
do
e ← i_to_expr e <|> do {
ty ← target,
e ← i_to_expr_strict ``(%%e : %%ty),
pty ← pp ty, ptgt ← pp e,
fail ("exact_mod_cast failed, expression type not directly " ++
"inferrable. Try:\n\nexact_mod_cast ...\nshow " ++
to_fmt pty ++ ",\nfrom " ++ ptgt : format)
},
tactic.exact_mod_cast e
/--
Normalize the goal and the given expression, then apply the expression to the goal.
-/
meta def apply_mod_cast (e : parse texpr) : tactic unit :=
do
e ← i_to_expr_for_apply e,
concat_tags $ tactic.apply_mod_cast e
/--
Normalize the goal and every expression in the local context, then close the goal with assumption.
-/
meta def assumption_mod_cast : tactic unit :=
tactic.assumption_mod_cast
end tactic.interactive
namespace conv.interactive
open conv
open norm_cast (derive)
/-- the converter version of `norm_cast' -/
meta def norm_cast : conv unit := replace_lhs derive
end conv.interactive
-- TODO: move this elsewhere?
@[norm_cast] lemma ite_cast {α β} [has_lift_t α β]
{c : Prop} [decidable c] {a b : α} :
↑(ite c a b) = ite c (↑a : β) (↑b : β) :=
by by_cases h : c; simp [h]
add_hint_tactic "norm_cast at *"
/--
The `norm_cast` family of tactics is used to normalize casts inside expressions.
It is basically a simp tactic with a specific set of lemmas to move casts
upwards in the expression.
Therefore it can be used more safely as a non-terminating tactic.
It also has special handling of numerals.
For instance, given an assumption
```lean
a b : ℤ
h : ↑a + ↑b < (10 : ℚ)
```
writing `norm_cast at h` will turn `h` into
```lean
h : a + b < 10
```
You can also use `exact_mod_cast`, `apply_mod_cast`, `rw_mod_cast`
or `assumption_mod_cast`.
Writing `exact_mod_cast h` and `apply_mod_cast h` will normalize the goal and
`h` before using `exact h` or `apply h`.
Writing `assumption_mod_cast` will normalize the goal and for every
expression `h` in the context it will try to normalize `h` and use
`exact h`.
`rw_mod_cast` acts like the `rw` tactic but it applies `norm_cast` between steps.
`push_cast` rewrites the expression to move casts toward the leaf nodes.
This uses `norm_cast` lemmas in the forward direction.
For example, `↑(a + b)` will be written to `↑a + ↑b`.
It is equivalent to `simp only with push_cast`.
It can also be used at hypotheses with `push_cast at h`
and with extra simp lemmas with `push_cast [int.add_zero]`.
```lean
example (a b : ℕ) (h1 : ((a + b : ℕ) : ℤ) = 10) (h2 : ((a + b + 0 : ℕ) : ℤ) = 10) :
((a + b : ℕ) : ℤ) = 10 :=
begin
push_cast,
push_cast at h1,
push_cast [int.add_zero] at h2,
end
```
The implementation and behavior of the `norm_cast` family is described in detail at
<https://lean-forward.github.io/norm_cast/norm_cast.pdf>.
-/
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "norm_cast",
category := doc_category.tactic,
decl_names := [``tactic.interactive.norm_cast, ``tactic.interactive.rw_mod_cast,
``tactic.interactive.apply_mod_cast, ``tactic.interactive.assumption_mod_cast,
``tactic.interactive.exact_mod_cast, ``tactic.interactive.push_cast],
tags := ["coercions", "simplification"] }
/--
The `norm_cast` attribute should be given to lemmas that describe the
behaviour of a coercion in regard to an operator, a relation, or a particular
function.
It only concerns equality or iff lemmas involving `↑`, `⇑` and `↥`, describing the behavior of
the coercion functions.
It does not apply to the explicit functions that define the coercions.
Examples:
```lean
@[norm_cast] theorem coe_nat_inj' {m n : ℕ} : (↑m : ℤ) = ↑n ↔ m = n
@[norm_cast] theorem coe_int_denom (n : ℤ) : (n : ℚ).denom = 1
@[norm_cast] theorem cast_id : ∀ n : ℚ, ↑n = n
@[norm_cast] theorem coe_nat_add (m n : ℕ) : (↑(m + n) : ℤ) = ↑m + ↑n
@[norm_cast] theorem cast_sub [add_group α] [has_one α] {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
((n - m : ℕ) : α) = n - m
@[norm_cast] theorem coe_nat_bit0 (n : ℕ) : (↑(bit0 n) : ℤ) = bit0 ↑n
@[norm_cast] theorem cast_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n
@[norm_cast] theorem cast_one : ((1 : ℚ) : α) = 1
```
Lemmas tagged with `@[norm_cast]` are classified into three categories: `move`, `elim`, and `squash`.
They are classified roughly as follows:
* elim lemma: LHS has 0 head coes and ≥ 1 internal coe
* move lemma: LHS has 1 head coe and 0 internal coes, RHS has 0 head coes and ≥ 1 internal coes
* squash lemma: LHS has ≥ 1 head coes and 0 internal coes, RHS has fewer head coes
`norm_cast` uses `move` and `elim` lemmas to factor coercions toward the root of an expression
and to cancel them from both sides of an equation or relation. It uses `squash` lemmas to clean
up the result.
Occasionally you may want to override the automatic classification.
You can do this by giving an optional `elim`, `move`, or `squash` parameter to the attribute.
```lean
@[simp, norm_cast elim] lemma nat_cast_re (n : ℕ) : (n : ℂ).re = n :=
by rw [← of_real_nat_cast, of_real_re]
```
Don't do this unless you understand what you are doing.
A full description of the tactic, and the use of each lemma category, can be found at
<https://lean-forward.github.io/norm_cast/norm_cast.pdf>.
-/
add_tactic_doc
{ name := "norm_cast attributes",
category := doc_category.attr,
decl_names := [``norm_cast.norm_cast_attr],
tags := ["coercions", "simplification"] }
-- Lemmas defined in core.
attribute [norm_cast]
int.nat_abs_of_nat
int.coe_nat_sub
int.coe_nat_mul
int.coe_nat_zero
int.coe_nat_one
int.coe_nat_add
-- Lemmas about nat.succ need to get a low priority, so that they are tried last.
-- This is because `nat.succ _` matches `1`, `3`, `x+1`, etc.
-- Rewriting would then produce really wrong terms.
attribute [norm_cast, priority 500] int.coe_nat_succ
|
df2fac62a67aad608bddee3c50ba2f482ece7d94 | 9028d228ac200bbefe3a711342514dd4e4458bff | /src/algebra/group/hom.lean | 3dd66e0363a4e6e18a87bc85dc1a292a170d9a08 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | mcncm/mathlib | 8d25099344d9d2bee62822cb9ed43aa3e09fa05e | fde3d78cadeec5ef827b16ae55664ef115e66f57 | refs/heads/master | 1,672,743,316,277 | 1,602,618,514,000 | 1,602,618,514,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 24,110 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Kevin Buzzard, Scott Morrison, Johan Commelin, Chris Hughes,
Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import algebra.group.commute
/-!
# monoid and group homomorphisms
This file defines the bundled structures for monoid and group homomorphisms. Namely, we define
`monoid_hom` (resp., `add_monoid_hom`) to be bundled homomorphisms between multiplicative (resp.,
additive) monoids or groups.
We also define coercion to a function, and usual operations: composition, identity homomorphism,
pointwise multiplication and pointwise inversion.
## Notations
* `→*` for bundled monoid homs (also use for group homs)
* `→+` for bundled add_monoid homs (also use for add_group homs)
## implementation notes
There's a coercion from bundled homs to fun, and the canonical
notation is to use the bundled hom as a function via this coercion.
There is no `group_hom` -- the idea is that `monoid_hom` is used.
The constructor for `monoid_hom` needs a proof of `map_one` as well
as `map_mul`; a separate constructor `monoid_hom.mk'` will construct
group homs (i.e. monoid homs between groups) given only a proof
that multiplication is preserved,
Implicit `{}` brackets are often used instead of type class `[]` brackets. This is done when the
instances can be inferred because they are implicit arguments to the type `monoid_hom`. When they
can be inferred from the type it is faster to use this method than to use type class inference.
Historically this file also included definitions of unbundled homomorphism classes; they were
deprecated and moved to `deprecated/group`.
## Tags
monoid_hom, add_monoid_hom
-/
variables {M : Type*} {N : Type*} {P : Type*} -- monoids
{G : Type*} {H : Type*} -- groups
-- for easy multiple inheritance
set_option old_structure_cmd true
/-- Homomorphism that preserves zero -/
structure zero_hom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [has_zero M] [has_zero N] :=
(to_fun : M → N)
(map_zero' : to_fun 0 = 0)
/-- Homomorphism that preserves addition -/
structure add_hom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [has_add M] [has_add N] :=
(to_fun : M → N)
(map_add' : ∀ x y, to_fun (x + y) = to_fun x + to_fun y)
/-- Bundled add_monoid homomorphisms; use this for bundled add_group homomorphisms too. -/
structure add_monoid_hom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [add_monoid M] [add_monoid N]
extends zero_hom M N, add_hom M N
attribute [nolint doc_blame] add_monoid_hom.to_add_hom
attribute [nolint doc_blame] add_monoid_hom.to_zero_hom
infixr ` →+ `:25 := add_monoid_hom
/-- Homomorphism that preserves one -/
@[to_additive]
structure one_hom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [has_one M] [has_one N] :=
(to_fun : M → N)
(map_one' : to_fun 1 = 1)
/-- Homomorphism that preserves multiplication -/
@[to_additive]
structure mul_hom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [has_mul M] [has_mul N] :=
(to_fun : M → N)
(map_mul' : ∀ x y, to_fun (x * y) = to_fun x * to_fun y)
/-- Bundled monoid homomorphisms; use this for bundled group homomorphisms too. -/
@[to_additive]
structure monoid_hom (M : Type*) (N : Type*) [monoid M] [monoid N] extends one_hom M N, mul_hom M N
attribute [nolint doc_blame] monoid_hom.to_mul_hom
attribute [nolint doc_blame] monoid_hom.to_one_hom
infixr ` →* `:25 := monoid_hom
-- completely uninteresting lemmas about coercion to function, that all homs need
section coes
@[to_additive]
instance {mM : has_one M} {mN : has_one N} : has_coe_to_fun (one_hom M N) :=
⟨_, one_hom.to_fun⟩
@[to_additive]
instance {mM : has_mul M} {mN : has_mul N} : has_coe_to_fun (mul_hom M N) :=
⟨_, mul_hom.to_fun⟩
@[to_additive]
instance {mM : monoid M} {mN : monoid N} : has_coe_to_fun (M →* N) :=
⟨_, monoid_hom.to_fun⟩
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma one_hom.to_fun_eq_coe [has_one M] [has_one N] (f : one_hom M N) : f.to_fun = f := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mul_hom.to_fun_eq_coe [has_mul M] [has_mul N] (f : mul_hom M N) : f.to_fun = f := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma monoid_hom.to_fun_eq_coe [monoid M] [monoid N] (f : M →* N) : f.to_fun = f := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma one_hom.coe_mk [has_one M] [has_one N]
(f : M → N) (h1) : ⇑(one_hom.mk f h1) = f := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mul_hom.coe_mk [has_mul M] [has_mul N]
(f : M → N) (hmul) : ⇑(mul_hom.mk f hmul) = f := rfl
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma monoid_hom.coe_mk [monoid M] [monoid N]
(f : M → N) (h1 hmul) : ⇑(monoid_hom.mk f h1 hmul) = f := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem one_hom.congr_fun [has_one M] [has_one N]
{f g : one_hom M N} (h : f = g) (x : M) : f x = g x :=
congr_arg (λ h : one_hom M N, h x) h
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_hom.congr_fun [has_mul M] [has_mul N]
{f g : mul_hom M N} (h : f = g) (x : M) : f x = g x :=
congr_arg (λ h : mul_hom M N, h x) h
@[to_additive]
theorem monoid_hom.congr_fun [monoid M] [monoid N]
{f g : M →* N} (h : f = g) (x : M) : f x = g x :=
congr_arg (λ h : M →* N, h x) h
@[to_additive]
theorem one_hom.congr_arg [has_one M] [has_one N]
(f : one_hom M N) {x y : M} (h : x = y) : f x = f y :=
congr_arg (λ x : M, f x) h
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_hom.congr_arg [has_mul M] [has_mul N]
(f : mul_hom M N) {x y : M} (h : x = y) : f x = f y :=
congr_arg (λ x : M, f x) h
@[to_additive]
theorem monoid_hom.congr_arg [monoid M] [monoid N]
(f : M →* N) {x y : M} (h : x = y) : f x = f y :=
congr_arg (λ x : M, f x) h
@[to_additive]
lemma one_hom.coe_inj [has_one M] [has_one N] ⦃f g : one_hom M N⦄ (h : (f : M → N) = g) : f = g :=
by cases f; cases g; cases h; refl
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_hom.coe_inj [has_mul M] [has_mul N] ⦃f g : mul_hom M N⦄ (h : (f : M → N) = g) : f = g :=
by cases f; cases g; cases h; refl
@[to_additive]
lemma monoid_hom.coe_inj [monoid M] [monoid N] ⦃f g : M →* N⦄ (h : (f : M → N) = g) : f = g :=
by cases f; cases g; cases h; refl
@[ext, to_additive]
lemma one_hom.ext [has_one M] [has_one N] ⦃f g : one_hom M N⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
one_hom.coe_inj (funext h)
@[ext, to_additive]
lemma mul_hom.ext [has_mul M] [has_mul N] ⦃f g : mul_hom M N⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
mul_hom.coe_inj (funext h)
@[ext, to_additive]
lemma monoid_hom.ext [monoid M] [monoid N] ⦃f g : M →* N⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
monoid_hom.coe_inj (funext h)
attribute [ext] zero_hom.ext add_hom.ext add_monoid_hom.ext
@[to_additive]
lemma one_hom.ext_iff [has_one M] [has_one N] {f g : one_hom M N} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
⟨λ h x, h ▸ rfl, λ h, one_hom.ext h⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_hom.ext_iff [has_mul M] [has_mul N] {f g : mul_hom M N} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
⟨λ h x, h ▸ rfl, λ h, mul_hom.ext h⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma monoid_hom.ext_iff [monoid M] [monoid N] {f g : M →* N} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
⟨λ h x, h ▸ rfl, λ h, monoid_hom.ext h⟩
end coes
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma one_hom.map_one [has_one M] [has_one N] (f : one_hom M N) : f 1 = 1 := f.map_one'
/-- If `f` is a monoid homomorphism then `f 1 = 1`. -/
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma monoid_hom.map_one [monoid M] [monoid N] (f : M →* N) : f 1 = 1 := f.map_one'
/-- If `f` is an additive monoid homomorphism then `f 0 = 0`. -/
add_decl_doc add_monoid_hom.map_zero
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma mul_hom.map_mul [has_mul M] [has_mul N]
(f : mul_hom M N) (a b : M) : f (a * b) = f a * f b := f.map_mul' a b
/-- If `f` is a monoid homomorphism then `f (a * b) = f a * f b`. -/
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma monoid_hom.map_mul [monoid M] [monoid N]
(f : M →* N) (a b : M) : f (a * b) = f a * f b := f.map_mul' a b
/-- If `f` is an additive monoid homomorphism then `f (a + b) = f a + f b`. -/
add_decl_doc add_monoid_hom.map_add
namespace monoid_hom
variables {mM : monoid M} {mN : monoid N} {mP : monoid P}
variables [group G] [comm_group H]
include mM mN
@[to_additive]
lemma map_mul_eq_one (f : M →* N) {a b : M} (h : a * b = 1) : f a * f b = 1 :=
by rw [← f.map_mul, h, f.map_one]
/-- Given a monoid homomorphism `f : M →* N` and an element `x : M`, if `x` has a right inverse,
then `f x` has a right inverse too. For elements invertible on both sides see `is_unit.map`. -/
@[to_additive "Given an add_monoid homomorphism `f : M →+ N` and an element `x : M`, if `x` has
a right inverse, then `f x` has a right inverse too."]
lemma map_exists_right_inv (f : M →* N) {x : M} (hx : ∃ y, x * y = 1) :
∃ y, f x * y = 1 :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hx in ⟨f y, f.map_mul_eq_one hy⟩
/-- Given a monoid homomorphism `f : M →* N` and an element `x : M`, if `x` has a left inverse,
then `f x` has a left inverse too. For elements invertible on both sides see `is_unit.map`. -/
@[to_additive "Given an add_monoid homomorphism `f : M →+ N` and an element `x : M`, if `x` has
a left inverse, then `f x` has a left inverse too. For elements invertible on both sides see
`is_add_unit.map`."]
lemma map_exists_left_inv (f : M →* N) {x : M} (hx : ∃ y, y * x = 1) :
∃ y, y * f x = 1 :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hx in ⟨f y, f.map_mul_eq_one hy⟩
end monoid_hom
/-- The identity map from a type with 1 to itself. -/
@[to_additive]
def one_hom.id (M : Type*) [has_one M] : one_hom M M :=
{ to_fun := id, map_one' := rfl, }
/-- The identity map from a type with multiplication to itself. -/
@[to_additive]
def mul_hom.id (M : Type*) [has_mul M] : mul_hom M M :=
{ to_fun := id, map_mul' := λ _ _, rfl, }
/-- The identity map from a monoid to itself. -/
@[to_additive]
def monoid_hom.id (M : Type*) [monoid M] : M →* M :=
{ to_fun := id, map_one' := rfl, map_mul' := λ _ _, rfl, }
/-- The identity map from an type with zero to itself. -/
add_decl_doc zero_hom.id
/-- The identity map from an type with addition to itself. -/
add_decl_doc add_hom.id
/-- The identity map from an additive monoid to itself. -/
add_decl_doc add_monoid_hom.id
@[simp, to_additive] lemma one_hom.id_apply {M : Type*} [has_one M] (x : M) :
one_hom.id M x = x := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_hom.id_apply {M : Type*} [has_mul M] (x : M) :
mul_hom.id M x = x := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma monoid_hom.id_apply {M : Type*} [monoid M] (x : M) :
monoid_hom.id M x = x := rfl
/-- Composition of `one_hom`s as a `one_hom`. -/
@[to_additive]
def one_hom.comp [has_one M] [has_one N] [has_one P]
(hnp : one_hom N P) (hmn : one_hom M N) : one_hom M P :=
{ to_fun := hnp ∘ hmn, map_one' := by simp, }
/-- Composition of `mul_hom`s as a `mul_hom`. -/
@[to_additive]
def mul_hom.comp [has_mul M] [has_mul N] [has_mul P]
(hnp : mul_hom N P) (hmn : mul_hom M N) : mul_hom M P :=
{ to_fun := hnp ∘ hmn, map_mul' := by simp, }
/-- Composition of monoid morphisms as a monoid morphism. -/
@[to_additive]
def monoid_hom.comp [monoid M] [monoid N] [monoid P] (hnp : N →* P) (hmn : M →* N) : M →* P :=
{ to_fun := hnp ∘ hmn, map_one' := by simp, map_mul' := by simp, }
/-- Composition of `zero_hom`s as a `zero_hom`. -/
add_decl_doc zero_hom.comp
/-- Composition of `add_hom`s as a `add_hom`. -/
add_decl_doc add_hom.comp
/-- Composition of additive monoid morphisms as an additive monoid morphism. -/
add_decl_doc add_monoid_hom.comp
@[simp, to_additive] lemma one_hom.comp_apply [has_one M] [has_one N] [has_one P]
(g : one_hom N P) (f : one_hom M N) (x : M) :
g.comp f x = g (f x) := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_hom.comp_apply [has_mul M] [has_mul N] [has_mul P]
(g : mul_hom N P) (f : mul_hom M N) (x : M) :
g.comp f x = g (f x) := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma monoid_hom.comp_apply [monoid M] [monoid N] [monoid P]
(g : N →* P) (f : M →* N) (x : M) :
g.comp f x = g (f x) := rfl
/-- Composition of monoid homomorphisms is associative. -/
@[to_additive] lemma one_hom.comp_assoc {Q : Type*} [has_one M] [has_one N] [has_one P] [has_one Q]
(f : one_hom M N) (g : one_hom N P) (h : one_hom P Q) :
(h.comp g).comp f = h.comp (g.comp f) := rfl
@[to_additive] lemma mul_hom.comp_assoc {Q : Type*} [has_mul M] [has_mul N] [has_mul P] [has_mul Q]
(f : mul_hom M N) (g : mul_hom N P) (h : mul_hom P Q) :
(h.comp g).comp f = h.comp (g.comp f) := rfl
@[to_additive] lemma monoid_hom.comp_assoc {Q : Type*} [monoid M] [monoid N] [monoid P] [monoid Q]
(f : M →* N) (g : N →* P) (h : P →* Q) :
(h.comp g).comp f = h.comp (g.comp f) := rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma one_hom.cancel_right [has_one M] [has_one N] [has_one P]
{g₁ g₂ : one_hom N P} {f : one_hom M N} (hf : function.surjective f) :
g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨λ h, one_hom.ext $ (forall_iff_forall_surj hf).1 (one_hom.ext_iff.1 h), λ h, h ▸ rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_hom.cancel_right [has_mul M] [has_mul N] [has_mul P]
{g₁ g₂ : mul_hom N P} {f : mul_hom M N} (hf : function.surjective f) :
g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨λ h, mul_hom.ext $ (forall_iff_forall_surj hf).1 (mul_hom.ext_iff.1 h), λ h, h ▸ rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma monoid_hom.cancel_right [monoid M] [monoid N] [monoid P]
{g₁ g₂ : N →* P} {f : M →* N} (hf : function.surjective f) :
g₁.comp f = g₂.comp f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨λ h, monoid_hom.ext $ (forall_iff_forall_surj hf).1 (monoid_hom.ext_iff.1 h), λ h, h ▸ rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma one_hom.cancel_left [has_one M] [has_one N] [has_one P]
{g : one_hom N P} {f₁ f₂ : one_hom M N} (hg : function.injective g) :
g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨λ h, one_hom.ext $ λ x, hg $ by rw [← one_hom.comp_apply, h, one_hom.comp_apply],
λ h, h ▸ rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_hom.cancel_left [has_one M] [has_one N] [has_one P]
{g : one_hom N P} {f₁ f₂ : one_hom M N} (hg : function.injective g) :
g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨λ h, one_hom.ext $ λ x, hg $ by rw [← one_hom.comp_apply, h, one_hom.comp_apply],
λ h, h ▸ rfl⟩
@[to_additive]
lemma monoid_hom.cancel_left [monoid M] [monoid N] [monoid P]
{g : N →* P} {f₁ f₂ : M →* N} (hg : function.injective g) :
g.comp f₁ = g.comp f₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ :=
⟨λ h, monoid_hom.ext $ λ x, hg $ by rw [← monoid_hom.comp_apply, h, monoid_hom.comp_apply],
λ h, h ▸ rfl⟩
@[simp, to_additive] lemma one_hom.comp_id [has_one M] [has_one N]
(f : one_hom M N) : f.comp (one_hom.id M) = f := one_hom.ext $ λ x, rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_hom.comp_id [has_mul M] [has_mul N]
(f : mul_hom M N) : f.comp (mul_hom.id M) = f := mul_hom.ext $ λ x, rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma monoid_hom.comp_id [monoid M] [monoid N]
(f : M →* N) : f.comp (monoid_hom.id M) = f := monoid_hom.ext $ λ x, rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma one_hom.id_comp [has_one M] [has_one N]
(f : one_hom M N) : (one_hom.id N).comp f = f := one_hom.ext $ λ x, rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_hom.id_comp [has_mul M] [has_mul N]
(f : mul_hom M N) : (mul_hom.id N).comp f = f := mul_hom.ext $ λ x, rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma monoid_hom.id_comp [monoid M] [monoid N]
(f : M →* N) : (monoid_hom.id N).comp f = f := monoid_hom.ext $ λ x, rfl
section End
namespace monoid
variables (M) [monoid M]
/-- The monoid of endomorphisms. -/
protected def End := M →* M
namespace End
instance : monoid (monoid.End M) :=
{ mul := monoid_hom.comp,
one := monoid_hom.id M,
mul_assoc := λ _ _ _, monoid_hom.comp_assoc _ _ _,
mul_one := monoid_hom.comp_id,
one_mul := monoid_hom.id_comp }
instance : inhabited (monoid.End M) := ⟨1⟩
instance : has_coe_to_fun (monoid.End M) := ⟨_, monoid_hom.to_fun⟩
end End
@[simp] lemma coe_one : ((1 : monoid.End M) : M → M) = id := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_mul (f g) : ((f * g : monoid.End M) : M → M) = f ∘ g := rfl
end monoid
namespace add_monoid
variables (A : Type*) [add_monoid A]
/-- The monoid of endomorphisms. -/
protected def End := A →+ A
namespace End
instance : monoid (add_monoid.End A) :=
{ mul := add_monoid_hom.comp,
one := add_monoid_hom.id A,
mul_assoc := λ _ _ _, add_monoid_hom.comp_assoc _ _ _,
mul_one := add_monoid_hom.comp_id,
one_mul := add_monoid_hom.id_comp }
instance : inhabited (add_monoid.End A) := ⟨1⟩
instance : has_coe_to_fun (add_monoid.End A) := ⟨_, add_monoid_hom.to_fun⟩
end End
@[simp] lemma coe_one : ((1 : add_monoid.End A) : A → A) = id := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_mul (f g) : ((f * g : add_monoid.End A) : A → A) = f ∘ g := rfl
end add_monoid
end End
/-- `1` is the homomorphism sending all elements to `1`. -/
@[to_additive]
instance [has_one M] [has_one N] : has_one (one_hom M N) := ⟨⟨λ _, 1, rfl⟩⟩
/-- `1` is the multiplicative homomorphism sending all elements to `1`. -/
@[to_additive]
instance [has_mul M] [monoid N] : has_one (mul_hom M N) := ⟨⟨λ _, 1, λ _ _, (one_mul 1).symm⟩⟩
/-- `1` is the monoid homomorphism sending all elements to `1`. -/
@[to_additive]
instance [monoid M] [monoid N] : has_one (M →* N) := ⟨⟨λ _, 1, rfl, λ _ _, (one_mul 1).symm⟩⟩
/-- `0` is the homomorphism sending all elements to `0`. -/
add_decl_doc zero_hom.has_zero
/-- `0` is the additive homomorphism sending all elements to `0`. -/
add_decl_doc add_hom.has_zero
/-- `0` is the additive monoid homomorphism sending all elements to `0`. -/
add_decl_doc add_monoid_hom.has_zero
@[simp, to_additive] lemma one_hom.one_apply [has_one M] [has_one N]
(x : M) : (1 : one_hom M N) x = 1 := rfl
@[simp, to_additive] lemma monoid_hom.one_apply [monoid M] [monoid N]
(x : M) : (1 : M →* N) x = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive]
instance [has_one M] [has_one N] : inhabited (one_hom M N) := ⟨1⟩
@[to_additive]
instance [has_mul M] [monoid N] : inhabited (mul_hom M N) := ⟨1⟩
@[to_additive]
instance [monoid M] [monoid N] : inhabited (M →* N) := ⟨1⟩
namespace monoid_hom
variables [mM : monoid M] [mN : monoid N] [mP : monoid P]
variables [group G] [comm_group H]
/-- Given two monoid morphisms `f`, `g` to a commutative monoid, `f * g` is the monoid morphism
sending `x` to `f x * g x`. -/
@[to_additive]
instance {M N} {mM : monoid M} [comm_monoid N] : has_mul (M →* N) :=
⟨λ f g,
{ to_fun := λ m, f m * g m,
map_one' := show f 1 * g 1 = 1, by simp,
map_mul' := begin intros, show f (x * y) * g (x * y) = f x * g x * (f y * g y),
rw [f.map_mul, g.map_mul, ←mul_assoc, ←mul_assoc, mul_right_comm (f x)], end }⟩
/-- Given two additive monoid morphisms `f`, `g` to an additive commutative monoid, `f + g` is the
additive monoid morphism sending `x` to `f x + g x`. -/
add_decl_doc add_monoid_hom.has_add
@[simp, to_additive] lemma mul_apply {M N} {mM : monoid M} {mN : comm_monoid N}
(f g : M →* N) (x : M) :
(f * g) x = f x * g x := rfl
/-- (M →* N) is a comm_monoid if N is commutative. -/
@[to_additive]
instance {M N} [monoid M] [comm_monoid N] : comm_monoid (M →* N) :=
{ mul := (*),
mul_assoc := by intros; ext; apply mul_assoc,
one := 1,
one_mul := by intros; ext; apply one_mul,
mul_one := by intros; ext; apply mul_one,
mul_comm := by intros; ext; apply mul_comm }
/-- `flip` arguments of `f : M →* N →* P` -/
@[to_additive "`flip` arguments of `f : M →+ N →+ P`"]
def flip {mM : monoid M} {mN : monoid N} {mP : comm_monoid P} (f : M →* N →* P) :
N →* M →* P :=
{ to_fun := λ y, ⟨λ x, f x y, by rw [f.map_one, one_apply], λ x₁ x₂, by rw [f.map_mul, mul_apply]⟩,
map_one' := ext $ λ x, (f x).map_one,
map_mul' := λ y₁ y₂, ext $ λ x, (f x).map_mul y₁ y₂ }
@[simp, to_additive] lemma flip_apply {mM : monoid M} {mN : monoid N} {mP : comm_monoid P}
(f : M →* N →* P) (x : M) (y : N) :
f.flip y x = f x y :=
rfl
/-- If two homomorphism from a group to a monoid are equal at `x`, then they are equal at `x⁻¹`. -/
@[to_additive "If two homomorphism from an additive group to an additive monoid are equal at `x`,
then they are equal at `-x`." ]
lemma eq_on_inv {G} [group G] [monoid M] {f g : G →* M} {x : G} (h : f x = g x) :
f x⁻¹ = g x⁻¹ :=
left_inv_eq_right_inv (f.map_mul_eq_one $ inv_mul_self x) $
h.symm ▸ g.map_mul_eq_one $ mul_inv_self x
/-- Group homomorphisms preserve inverse. -/
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem map_inv {G H} [group G] [group H] (f : G →* H) (g : G) : f g⁻¹ = (f g)⁻¹ :=
eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one $ f.map_mul_eq_one $ inv_mul_self g
/-- Group homomorphisms preserve division. -/
@[simp, to_additive]
theorem map_mul_inv {G H} [group G] [group H] (f : G →* H) (g h : G) :
f (g * h⁻¹) = (f g) * (f h)⁻¹ := by rw [f.map_mul, f.map_inv]
/-- A homomorphism from a group to a monoid is injective iff its kernel is trivial. -/
@[to_additive]
lemma injective_iff {G H} [group G] [monoid H] (f : G →* H) :
function.injective f ↔ (∀ a, f a = 1 → a = 1) :=
⟨λ h x hfx, h $ hfx.trans f.map_one.symm,
λ h x y hxy, mul_inv_eq_one.1 $ h _ $ by rw [f.map_mul, hxy, ← f.map_mul, mul_inv_self, f.map_one]⟩
include mM
/-- Makes a group homomomorphism from a proof that the map preserves multiplication. -/
@[to_additive]
def mk' (f : M → G) (map_mul : ∀ a b : M, f (a * b) = f a * f b) : M →* G :=
{ to_fun := f,
map_mul' := map_mul,
map_one' := mul_self_iff_eq_one.1 $ by rw [←map_mul, mul_one] }
/-- Makes an additive group homomomorphism from a proof that the map preserves multiplication. -/
add_decl_doc add_monoid_hom.mk'
@[simp, to_additive]
lemma coe_mk' {f : M → G} (map_mul : ∀ a b : M, f (a * b) = f a * f b) :
⇑(mk' f map_mul) = f := rfl
omit mM
/-- Makes a group homomorphism from a proof that the map preserves right division `λ x y, x * y⁻¹`.
-/
@[to_additive "Makes an additive group homomorphism from a proof that the map preserves
the operation `λ a b, a + -b`. See also `add_monoid_hom.of_map_sub` for a version using
`λ a b, a - b`."]
def of_map_mul_inv {H : Type*} [group H] (f : G → H)
(map_div : ∀ a b : G, f (a * b⁻¹) = f a * (f b)⁻¹) :
G →* H :=
mk' f $ λ x y,
calc f (x * y) = f x * (f $ 1 * 1⁻¹ * y⁻¹)⁻¹ : by simp only [one_mul, one_inv, ← map_div, inv_inv]
... = f x * f y : by { simp only [map_div], simp only [mul_right_inv, one_mul, inv_inv] }
@[simp, to_additive] lemma coe_of_map_mul_inv {H : Type*} [group H] (f : G → H)
(map_div : ∀ a b : G, f (a * b⁻¹) = f a * (f b)⁻¹) :
⇑(of_map_mul_inv f map_div) = f :=
rfl
/-- If `f` is a monoid homomorphism to a commutative group, then `f⁻¹` is the homomorphism sending
`x` to `(f x)⁻¹`. -/
@[to_additive]
instance {M G} [monoid M] [comm_group G] : has_inv (M →* G) :=
⟨λ f, mk' (λ g, (f g)⁻¹) $ λ a b, by rw [←mul_inv, f.map_mul]⟩
/-- If `f` is an additive monoid homomorphism to an additive commutative group, then `-f` is the
homomorphism sending `x` to `-(f x)`. -/
add_decl_doc add_monoid_hom.has_neg
@[simp, to_additive] lemma inv_apply {M G} {mM : monoid M} {gG : comm_group G}
(f : M →* G) (x : M) :
f⁻¹ x = (f x)⁻¹ := rfl
/-- If `G` is a commutative group, then `M →* G` a commutative group too. -/
@[to_additive]
instance {M G} [monoid M] [comm_group G] : comm_group (M →* G) :=
{ inv := has_inv.inv,
mul_left_inv := by intros; ext; apply mul_left_inv,
..monoid_hom.comm_monoid }
/-- If `G` is an additive commutative group, then `M →+ G` an additive commutative group too. -/
add_decl_doc add_monoid_hom.add_comm_group
end monoid_hom
namespace add_monoid_hom
variables [add_group G] [add_group H]
/-- Additive group homomorphisms preserve subtraction. -/
@[simp] theorem map_sub (f : G →+ H) (g h : G) : f (g - h) = (f g) - (f h) := f.map_add_neg g h
/-- Define a morphism of additive groups given a map which respects difference. -/
def of_map_sub (f : G → H) (hf : ∀ x y, f (x - y) = f x - f y) : G →+ H :=
of_map_add_neg f hf
@[simp] lemma coe_of_map_sub (f : G → H) (hf : ∀ x y, f (x - y) = f x - f y) :
⇑(of_map_sub f hf) = f :=
rfl
end add_monoid_hom
section commute
variables [monoid M] [monoid N] {a x y : M}
@[simp, to_additive]
protected lemma semiconj_by.map (h : semiconj_by a x y) (f : M →* N) :
semiconj_by (f a) (f x) (f y) :=
by simpa only [semiconj_by, f.map_mul] using congr_arg f h
@[simp, to_additive]
protected lemma commute.map (h : commute x y) (f : M →* N) : commute (f x) (f y) := h.map f
end commute
|
62cac2ee647dcec49f2496de8cb11aa906caeda3 | 74addaa0e41490cbaf2abd313a764c96df57b05d | /Mathlib/category_theory/monoidal/discrete_auto.lean | f876c3f1c5b8dea35e3130990be75ec41180c64b | [] | no_license | AurelienSaue/Mathlib4_auto | f538cfd0980f65a6361eadea39e6fc639e9dae14 | 590df64109b08190abe22358fabc3eae000943f2 | refs/heads/master | 1,683,906,849,776 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 1,622,564,669,000 | 371,723,747 | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 2,497 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.PrePort
import Mathlib.Lean3Lib.init.default
import Mathlib.category_theory.monoidal.natural_transformation
import Mathlib.category_theory.discrete_category
import Mathlib.algebra.group.hom
import Mathlib.PostPort
universes u
namespace Mathlib
/-!
# Monoids as discrete monoidal categories
The discrete category on a monoid is a monoidal category.
Multiplicative morphisms induced monoidal functors.
-/
namespace category_theory
protected instance monoid_discrete (M : Type u) [monoid M] : monoid (discrete M) := id _inst_1
protected instance discrete.monoidal_category (M : Type u) [monoid M] :
monoidal_category (discrete M) :=
monoidal_category.mk (fun (X Y : discrete M) => X * Y)
(fun (W X Y Z : discrete M) (f : W ⟶ X) (g : Y ⟶ Z) => eq_to_hom sorry) 1
(fun (X Y Z : discrete M) => eq_to_iso sorry) (fun (X : discrete M) => eq_to_iso sorry)
fun (X : discrete M) => eq_to_iso sorry
/--
A multiplicative morphism between monoids gives a monoidal functor between the corresponding
discrete monoidal categories.
-/
@[simp] theorem discrete.monoidal_functor_μ_is_iso {M : Type u} [monoid M] {N : Type u} [monoid N]
(F : M →* N) (X : discrete M) (Y : discrete M) :
monoidal_functor.μ_is_iso (discrete.monoidal_functor F) X Y =
discrete.category_theory.is_iso
(lax_monoidal_functor.μ
(lax_monoidal_functor.mk
(functor.mk ⇑F
fun (X Y : discrete M) (f : X ⟶ Y) =>
eq_to_hom (discrete.monoidal_functor._proof_1 F X Y f))
(eq_to_hom (discrete.monoidal_functor._proof_4 F))
fun (X Y : discrete M) => eq_to_hom (discrete.monoidal_functor._proof_5 F X Y))
X Y) :=
Eq.refl (monoidal_functor.μ_is_iso (discrete.monoidal_functor F) X Y)
/--
The monoidal natural isomorphism corresponding to composing two multiplicative morphisms.
-/
def discrete.monoidal_functor_comp {M : Type u} [monoid M] {N : Type u} [monoid N] {K : Type u}
[monoid K] (F : M →* N) (G : N →* K) :
discrete.monoidal_functor F ⊗⋙ discrete.monoidal_functor G ≅
discrete.monoidal_functor (monoid_hom.comp G F) :=
iso.mk (monoidal_nat_trans.mk (nat_trans.mk fun (X : discrete M) => 𝟙))
(monoidal_nat_trans.mk (nat_trans.mk fun (X : discrete M) => 𝟙))
end Mathlib |
f61e17466c52c6681ad774ec6f1239e8bc35ea50 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/number_theory/liouville/measure.lean | b8fc7040fa943379aaf9a55be502a14838b4883e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 6,277 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import measure_theory.measure.lebesgue.basic
import number_theory.liouville.residual
import number_theory.liouville.liouville_with
import analysis.p_series
/-!
# Volume of the set of Liouville numbers
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
In this file we prove that the set of Liouville numbers with exponent (irrationality measure)
strictly greater than two is a set of Lebesuge measure zero, see
`volume_Union_set_of_liouville_with`.
Since this set is a residual set, we show that the filters `residual` and `volume.ae` are disjoint.
These filters correspond to two common notions of genericity on `ℝ`: residual sets and sets of full
measure. The fact that the filters are disjoint means that two mutually exclusive properties can be
“generic” at the same time (in the sense of different “genericity” filters).
## Tags
Liouville number, Lebesgue measure, residual, generic property
-/
open_locale filter big_operators ennreal topology nnreal
open filter set metric measure_theory real
lemma set_of_liouville_with_subset_aux :
{x : ℝ | ∃ p > 2, liouville_with p x} ⊆
⋃ m : ℤ, (λ x : ℝ, x + m) ⁻¹' (⋃ n > (0 : ℕ),
{x : ℝ | ∃ᶠ b : ℕ in at_top, ∃ a ∈ finset.Icc (0 : ℤ) b,
|x - (a : ℤ) / b| < 1 / b ^ (2 + 1 / n : ℝ)}) :=
begin
rintro x ⟨p, hp, hxp⟩,
rcases exists_nat_one_div_lt (sub_pos.2 hp) with ⟨n, hn⟩,
rw lt_sub_iff_add_lt' at hn,
suffices : ∀ y : ℝ, liouville_with p y → y ∈ Ico (0 : ℝ) 1 →
∃ᶠ b : ℕ in at_top, ∃ a ∈ finset.Icc (0 : ℤ) b, |y - a / b| < 1 / b ^ (2 + 1 / (n + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ),
{ simp only [mem_Union, mem_preimage],
have hx : x + ↑(-⌊x⌋) ∈ Ico (0 : ℝ) 1,
{ simp only [int.floor_le, int.lt_floor_add_one, add_neg_lt_iff_le_add', zero_add, and_self,
mem_Ico, int.cast_neg, le_add_neg_iff_add_le] },
refine ⟨-⌊x⌋, n + 1, n.succ_pos, this _ (hxp.add_int _) hx⟩ },
clear hxp x, intros x hxp hx01,
refine ((hxp.frequently_lt_rpow_neg hn).and_eventually (eventually_ge_at_top 1)).mono _,
rintro b ⟨⟨a, hne, hlt⟩, hb⟩,
rw [rpow_neg b.cast_nonneg, ← one_div, ← nat.cast_succ] at hlt,
refine ⟨a, _, hlt⟩,
replace hb : (1 : ℝ) ≤ b, from nat.one_le_cast.2 hb,
have hb0 : (0 : ℝ) < b := zero_lt_one.trans_le hb,
replace hlt : |x - a / b| < 1 / b,
{ refine hlt.trans_le (one_div_le_one_div_of_le hb0 _),
calc (b : ℝ) = b ^ (1 : ℝ) : (rpow_one _).symm
... ≤ b ^ (2 + 1 / (n + 1 : ℕ) : ℝ) : rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hb (one_le_two.trans _),
simpa using n.cast_add_one_pos.le },
rw [sub_div' _ _ _ hb0.ne', abs_div, abs_of_pos hb0, div_lt_div_right hb0,
abs_sub_lt_iff, sub_lt_iff_lt_add, sub_lt_iff_lt_add, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add'] at hlt,
rw [finset.mem_Icc, ← int.lt_add_one_iff, ← int.lt_add_one_iff, ← neg_lt_iff_pos_add, add_comm,
← @int.cast_lt ℝ, ← @int.cast_lt ℝ], push_cast,
refine ⟨lt_of_le_of_lt _ hlt.1, hlt.2.trans_le _⟩,
{ simp only [mul_nonneg hx01.left b.cast_nonneg, neg_le_sub_iff_le_add, le_add_iff_nonneg_left] },
{ rw [add_le_add_iff_left],
calc x * b ≤ 1 * b : mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hx01.2.le hb0.le
... = b : one_mul b }
end
/-- The set of numbers satisfying the Liouville condition with some exponent `p > 2` has Lebesgue
measure zero. -/
@[simp] lemma volume_Union_set_of_liouville_with :
volume (⋃ (p : ℝ) (hp : 2 < p), {x : ℝ | liouville_with p x}) = 0 :=
begin
simp only [← set_of_exists],
refine measure_mono_null set_of_liouville_with_subset_aux _,
rw measure_Union_null_iff, intro m, rw measure_preimage_add_right, clear m,
refine (measure_bUnion_null_iff $ to_countable _).2 (λ n (hn : 1 ≤ n), _),
generalize hr : (2 + 1 / n : ℝ) = r,
replace hr : 2 < r, by simp [← hr, zero_lt_one.trans_le hn], clear hn n,
refine measure_set_of_frequently_eq_zero _,
simp only [set_of_exists, ← real.dist_eq, ← mem_ball, set_of_mem_eq],
set B : ℤ → ℕ → set ℝ := λ a b, ball (a / b) (1 / b ^ r),
have hB : ∀ a b, volume (B a b) = ↑(2 / b ^ r : ℝ≥0),
{ intros a b,
rw [real.volume_ball, mul_one_div, ← nnreal.coe_two, ← nnreal.coe_nat_cast, ← nnreal.coe_rpow,
← nnreal.coe_div, ennreal.of_real_coe_nnreal] },
have : ∀ b : ℕ, volume (⋃ a ∈ finset.Icc (0 : ℤ) b, B a b) ≤ (2 * (b ^ (1 - r) + b ^ (-r)) : ℝ≥0),
{ intro b,
calc volume (⋃ a ∈ finset.Icc (0 : ℤ) b, B a b)
≤ ∑ a in finset.Icc (0 : ℤ) b, volume (B a b) : measure_bUnion_finset_le _ _
... = ((b + 1) * (2 / b ^ r) : ℝ≥0) :
by simp only [hB, int.card_Icc, finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul, sub_zero,
← int.coe_nat_succ, int.to_nat_coe_nat, ← nat.cast_succ, ennreal.coe_mul, ennreal.coe_nat]
... = _ : _,
have : 1 - r ≠ 0, by linarith,
rw [ennreal.coe_eq_coe],
simp [add_mul, div_eq_mul_inv, nnreal.rpow_neg, nnreal.rpow_sub' _ this, mul_add,
mul_left_comm] },
refine ne_top_of_le_ne_top (ennreal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable.2 _)
(ennreal.tsum_le_tsum this),
refine (summable.add _ _).mul_left _; simp only [nnreal.summable_rpow]; linarith
end
lemma ae_not_liouville_with : ∀ᵐ x, ∀ p > (2 : ℝ), ¬liouville_with p x :=
by simpa only [ae_iff, not_forall, not_not, set_of_exists]
using volume_Union_set_of_liouville_with
lemma ae_not_liouville : ∀ᵐ x, ¬liouville x :=
ae_not_liouville_with.mono $ λ x h₁ h₂, h₁ 3 (by norm_num) (h₂.liouville_with 3)
/-- The set of Liouville numbers has Lebesgue measure zero. -/
@[simp] lemma volume_set_of_liouville : volume {x : ℝ | liouville x} = 0 :=
by simpa only [ae_iff, not_not] using ae_not_liouville
/-- The filters `residual ℝ` and `volume.ae` are disjoint. This means that there exists a residual
set of Lebesgue measure zero (e.g., the set of Liouville numbers). -/
lemma real.disjoint_residual_ae : disjoint (residual ℝ) volume.ae :=
disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem disjoint_compl_right eventually_residual_liouville ae_not_liouville
|
c945f0ca92e12d18b57482128ea77acb7f77b37e | fa02ed5a3c9c0adee3c26887a16855e7841c668b | /src/algebra/linear_recurrence.lean | 7ecb0dfd91b71381b3c4d992b7bb1bb557e90a15 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | jjgarzella/mathlib | 96a345378c4e0bf26cf604aed84f90329e4896a2 | 395d8716c3ad03747059d482090e2bb97db612c8 | refs/heads/master | 1,686,480,124,379 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 1,625,163,323,000 | 281,190,421 | 2 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,595,268,170,000 | 1,595,268,169,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,254 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
-/
import data.polynomial.ring_division
import linear_algebra.dimension
import algebra.polynomial.big_operators
/-!
# Linear recurrence
Informally, a "linear recurrence" is an assertion of the form
`∀ n : ℕ, u (n + d) = a 0 * u n + a 1 * u (n+1) + ... + a (d-1) * u (n+d-1)`,
where `u` is a sequence, `d` is the *order* of the recurrence and the `a i`
are its *coefficients*.
In this file, we define the structure `linear_recurrence` so that
`linear_recurrence.mk d a` represents the above relation, and we call
a sequence `u` which verifies it a *solution* of the linear recurrence.
We prove a few basic lemmas about this concept, such as :
* the space of solutions is a submodule of `(ℕ → α)` (i.e a vector space if `α`
is a field)
* the function that maps a solution `u` to its first `d` terms builds a `linear_equiv`
between the solution space and `fin d → α`, aka `α ^ d`. As a consequence, two
solutions are equal if and only if their first `d` terms are equals.
* a geometric sequence `q ^ n` is solution iff `q` is a root of a particular polynomial,
which we call the *characteristic polynomial* of the recurrence
Of course, although we can inductively generate solutions (cf `mk_sol`), the
interesting part would be to determinate closed-forms for the solutions.
This is currently *not implemented*, as we are waiting for definition and
properties of eigenvalues and eigenvectors.
-/
noncomputable theory
open finset
open_locale big_operators
/-- A "linear recurrence relation" over a commutative semiring is given by its
order `n` and `n` coefficients. -/
structure linear_recurrence (α : Type*) [comm_semiring α] := (order : ℕ) (coeffs : fin order → α)
instance (α : Type*) [comm_semiring α] : inhabited (linear_recurrence α) :=
⟨⟨0, default _⟩⟩
namespace linear_recurrence
section comm_semiring
variables {α : Type*} [comm_semiring α] (E : linear_recurrence α)
/-- We say that a sequence `u` is solution of `linear_recurrence order coeffs` when we have
`u (n + order) = ∑ i : fin order, coeffs i * u (n + i)` for any `n`. -/
def is_solution (u : ℕ → α) :=
∀ n, u (n + E.order) = ∑ i, E.coeffs i * u (n + i)
/-- A solution of a `linear_recurrence` which satisfies certain initial conditions.
We will prove this is the only such solution. -/
def mk_sol (init : fin E.order → α) : ℕ → α
| n := if h : n < E.order then init ⟨n, h⟩ else
∑ k : fin E.order,
have n - E.order + k < n :=
begin
rw [add_comm, ← nat.add_sub_assoc (not_lt.mp h), nat.sub_lt_left_iff_lt_add],
{ exact add_lt_add_right k.is_lt n },
{ convert add_le_add (zero_le (k : ℕ)) (not_lt.mp h),
simp only [zero_add] }
end,
E.coeffs k * mk_sol (n - E.order + k)
/-- `E.mk_sol` indeed gives solutions to `E`. -/
lemma is_sol_mk_sol (init : fin E.order → α) : E.is_solution (E.mk_sol init) :=
λ n, by rw mk_sol; simp
/-- `E.mk_sol init`'s first `E.order` terms are `init`. -/
lemma mk_sol_eq_init (init : fin E.order → α) : ∀ n : fin E.order, E.mk_sol init n = init n :=
λ n, by { rw mk_sol, simp only [n.is_lt, dif_pos, fin.mk_coe, fin.eta] }
/-- If `u` is a solution to `E` and `init` designates its first `E.order` values,
then `∀ n, u n = E.mk_sol init n`. -/
lemma eq_mk_of_is_sol_of_eq_init {u : ℕ → α} {init : fin E.order → α}
(h : E.is_solution u) (heq : ∀ n : fin E.order, u n = init n) :
∀ n, u n = E.mk_sol init n
| n := if h' : n < E.order
then by rw mk_sol; simp only [h', dif_pos]; exact_mod_cast heq ⟨n, h'⟩
else begin
rw [mk_sol, ← nat.sub_add_cancel (le_of_not_lt h'), h (n-E.order)],
simp [h'],
congr' with k,
exact have wf : n - E.order + k < n :=
begin
rw [add_comm, ← nat.add_sub_assoc (not_lt.mp h'), nat.sub_lt_left_iff_lt_add],
{ exact add_lt_add_right k.is_lt n },
{ convert add_le_add (zero_le (k : ℕ)) (not_lt.mp h'),
simp only [zero_add] }
end,
by rw eq_mk_of_is_sol_of_eq_init
end
/-- If `u` is a solution to `E` and `init` designates its first `E.order` values,
then `u = E.mk_sol init`. This proves that `E.mk_sol init` is the only solution
of `E` whose first `E.order` values are given by `init`. -/
lemma eq_mk_of_is_sol_of_eq_init' {u : ℕ → α} {init : fin E.order → α}
(h : E.is_solution u) (heq : ∀ n : fin E.order, u n = init n) : u = E.mk_sol init :=
funext (E.eq_mk_of_is_sol_of_eq_init h heq)
/-- The space of solutions of `E`, as a `submodule` over `α` of the module `ℕ → α`. -/
def sol_space : submodule α (ℕ → α) :=
{ carrier := {u | E.is_solution u},
zero_mem' := λ n, by simp,
add_mem' := λ u v hu hv n, by simp [mul_add, sum_add_distrib, hu n, hv n],
smul_mem' := λ a u hu n, by simp [hu n, mul_sum]; congr'; ext; ac_refl }
/-- Defining property of the solution space : `u` is a solution
iff it belongs to the solution space. -/
lemma is_sol_iff_mem_sol_space (u : ℕ → α) : E.is_solution u ↔ u ∈ E.sol_space :=
iff.rfl
/-- The function that maps a solution `u` of `E` to its first
`E.order` terms as a `linear_equiv`. -/
def to_init :
E.sol_space ≃ₗ[α] (fin E.order → α) :=
{ to_fun := λ u x, (u : ℕ → α) x,
map_add' := λ u v, by { ext, simp },
map_smul' := λ a u, by { ext, simp },
inv_fun := λ u, ⟨E.mk_sol u, E.is_sol_mk_sol u⟩,
left_inv := λ u, by ext n; symmetry; apply E.eq_mk_of_is_sol_of_eq_init u.2; intros k; refl,
right_inv := λ u, function.funext_iff.mpr (λ n, E.mk_sol_eq_init u n) }
/-- Two solutions are equal iff they are equal on `range E.order`. -/
lemma sol_eq_of_eq_init (u v : ℕ → α) (hu : E.is_solution u) (hv : E.is_solution v) :
u = v ↔ set.eq_on u v ↑(range E.order) :=
begin
refine iff.intro (λ h x hx, h ▸ rfl) _,
intro h,
set u' : ↥(E.sol_space) := ⟨u, hu⟩,
set v' : ↥(E.sol_space) := ⟨v, hv⟩,
change u'.val = v'.val,
suffices h' : u' = v', from h' ▸ rfl,
rw [← E.to_init.to_equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq, linear_equiv.coe_to_equiv],
ext x,
exact_mod_cast h (mem_range.mpr x.2)
end
/-! `E.tuple_succ` maps `![s₀, s₁, ..., sₙ]` to `![s₁, ..., sₙ, ∑ (E.coeffs i) * sᵢ]`,
where `n := E.order`. This operation is quite useful for determining closed-form
solutions of `E`. -/
/-- `E.tuple_succ` maps `![s₀, s₁, ..., sₙ]` to `![s₁, ..., sₙ, ∑ (E.coeffs i) * sᵢ]`,
where `n := E.order`. -/
def tuple_succ : (fin E.order → α) →ₗ[α] (fin E.order → α) :=
{ to_fun := λ X i, if h : (i : ℕ) + 1 < E.order then X ⟨i+1, h⟩ else (∑ i, E.coeffs i * X i),
map_add' := λ x y,
begin
ext i,
split_ifs ; simp [h, mul_add, sum_add_distrib],
end,
map_smul' := λ x y,
begin
ext i,
split_ifs ; simp [h, mul_sum],
exact sum_congr rfl (λ x _, by ac_refl),
end }
end comm_semiring
section field
variables {α : Type*} [field α] (E : linear_recurrence α)
/-- The dimension of `E.sol_space` is `E.order`. -/
lemma sol_space_dim : module.rank α E.sol_space = E.order :=
@dim_fin_fun α _ E.order ▸ E.to_init.dim_eq
end field
section comm_ring
variables {α : Type*} [comm_ring α] (E : linear_recurrence α)
/-- The characteristic polynomial of `E` is
`X ^ E.order - ∑ i : fin E.order, (E.coeffs i) * X ^ i`. -/
def char_poly : polynomial α :=
polynomial.monomial E.order 1 - (∑ i : fin E.order, polynomial.monomial i (E.coeffs i))
/-- The geometric sequence `q^n` is a solution of `E` iff
`q` is a root of `E`'s characteristic polynomial. -/
lemma geom_sol_iff_root_char_poly (q : α) : E.is_solution (λ n, q^n) ↔ E.char_poly.is_root q :=
begin
rw [char_poly, polynomial.is_root.def, polynomial.eval],
simp only [polynomial.eval₂_finset_sum, one_mul,
ring_hom.id_apply, polynomial.eval₂_monomial, polynomial.eval₂_sub],
split,
{ intro h,
simpa [sub_eq_zero] using h 0 },
{ intros h n,
simp only [pow_add, sub_eq_zero.mp h, mul_sum],
exact sum_congr rfl (λ _ _, by ring) }
end
end comm_ring
end linear_recurrence
|
f680d95f1a86dd2291cd5c61db9db32e30645aba | ba4794a0deca1d2aaa68914cd285d77880907b5c | /src/game/world4/level6.lean | 8d5103f098a9f86602716620bb7cec87bff2695a | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | ChrisHughes24/natural_number_game | c7c00aa1f6a95004286fd456ed13cf6e113159ce | 9d09925424da9f6275e6cfe427c8bcf12bb0944f | refs/heads/master | 1,600,715,773,528 | 1,573,910,462,000 | 1,573,910,462,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 684 | lean | import game.world4.level5 -- hide
namespace mynat -- hide
/-
# Power World
## Level 6: `mul_pow`
You might find the tip at the end of level 9 of Multiplication World
useful in this one. You can go to the main menu and pop back into
Multiplication World and take a look -- you won't lose any of your
proofs. You'll only lose proofs if you reload the page.
-/
/- Lemma
For all naturals $a$, $b$, $n$, we have $(ab) ^ n = a ^ nb ^ n$.
-/
lemma mul_pow (a b n : mynat) : (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n :=
begin [less_leaky]
induction n with t Ht,
rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, pow_zero, mul_one],
refl,
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, pow_succ, Ht],
simp,
end
end mynat -- hide
|
feb5f50777a6befdb6ad7bee17697667afe5f84b | b9d8165d695e844c92d9d4cdcac7b5ab9efe09f7 | /src/topology/continuous_on.lean | 2bd1ec61d29239ccf1dc02df6fe504b9104cc1ae | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | spapinistarkware/mathlib | e917d9c44bf85ef51db18e7a11615959f714efc5 | 0a9a1ff463a1f26e27d7c391eb7f6334f0d90383 | refs/heads/master | 1,606,808,129,547 | 1,577,478,369,000 | 1,577,478,369,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 22,965 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import topology.constructions
/-!
# Neighborhoods and continuity relative to a subset
This file defines relative versions
`nhds_within` of `nhds`
`continuous_on` of `continuous`
`continuous_within_at` of `continuous_at`
and proves their basic properties, including the relationships between
these restricted notions and the corresponding notions for the subtype
equipped with the subspace topology.
-/
open set filter
open_locale topological_space
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
variables [topological_space α]
/-- The "neighborhood within" filter. Elements of `nhds_within a s` are sets containing the
intersection of `s` and a neighborhood of `a`. -/
def nhds_within (a : α) (s : set α) : filter α := 𝓝 a ⊓ principal s
theorem nhds_within_eq (a : α) (s : set α) :
nhds_within a s = ⨅ t ∈ {t : set α | a ∈ t ∧ is_open t}, principal (t ∩ s) :=
have set.univ ∈ {s : set α | a ∈ s ∧ is_open s}, from ⟨set.mem_univ _, is_open_univ⟩,
begin
rw [nhds_within, nhds, lattice.binfi_inf]; try { exact this },
simp only [inf_principal]
end
theorem nhds_within_univ (a : α) : nhds_within a set.univ = 𝓝 a :=
by rw [nhds_within, principal_univ, lattice.inf_top_eq]
theorem mem_nhds_within {t : set α} {a : α} {s : set α} :
t ∈ nhds_within a s ↔ ∃ u, is_open u ∧ a ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ t :=
begin
rw [nhds_within, mem_inf_principal, mem_nhds_sets_iff], split,
{ rintros ⟨u, hu, openu, au⟩,
exact ⟨u, openu, au, λ x ⟨xu, xs⟩, hu xu xs⟩ },
rintros ⟨u, openu, au, hu⟩,
exact ⟨u, λ x xu xs, hu ⟨xu, xs⟩, openu, au⟩
end
lemma mem_nhds_within_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter {t : set α} {a : α} {s : set α} :
t ∈ nhds_within a s ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 a, u ∩ s ⊆ t :=
begin
rw [nhds_within, mem_inf_principal],
split,
{ exact λH, ⟨_, H, λx hx, hx.1 hx.2⟩ },
{ exact λ⟨u, Hu, h⟩, mem_sets_of_superset Hu (λx xu xs, h ⟨xu, xs⟩ ) }
end
lemma mem_nhds_within_of_mem_nhds {s t : set α} {a : α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 a) :
s ∈ nhds_within a t :=
mem_inf_sets_of_left h
theorem self_mem_nhds_within {a : α} {s : set α} : s ∈ nhds_within a s :=
begin
rw [nhds_within, mem_inf_principal],
simp only [imp_self],
exact univ_mem_sets
end
theorem inter_mem_nhds_within (s : set α) {t : set α} {a : α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) :
s ∩ t ∈ nhds_within a s :=
inter_mem_sets (mem_inf_sets_of_right (mem_principal_self s)) (mem_inf_sets_of_left h)
theorem nhds_within_mono (a : α) {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : nhds_within a s ≤ nhds_within a t :=
lattice.inf_le_inf (le_refl _) (principal_mono.mpr h)
theorem nhds_within_restrict'' {a : α} (s : set α) {t : set α} (h : t ∈ nhds_within a s) :
nhds_within a s = nhds_within a (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(lattice.le_inf lattice.inf_le_left (le_principal_iff.mpr (inter_mem_sets self_mem_nhds_within h)))
(lattice.inf_le_inf (le_refl _) (principal_mono.mpr (set.inter_subset_left _ _)))
theorem nhds_within_restrict' {a : α} (s : set α) {t : set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) :
nhds_within a s = nhds_within a (s ∩ t) :=
nhds_within_restrict'' s $ mem_inf_sets_of_left h
theorem nhds_within_restrict {a : α} (s : set α) {t : set α} (h₀ : a ∈ t) (h₁ : is_open t) :
nhds_within a s = nhds_within a (s ∩ t) :=
nhds_within_restrict' s (mem_nhds_sets h₁ h₀)
theorem nhds_within_le_of_mem {a : α} {s t : set α} (h : s ∈ nhds_within a t) :
nhds_within a t ≤ nhds_within a s :=
begin
rcases mem_nhds_within.1 h with ⟨u, u_open, au, uts⟩,
have : nhds_within a t = nhds_within a (t ∩ u) := nhds_within_restrict _ au u_open,
rw [this, inter_comm],
exact nhds_within_mono _ uts
end
theorem nhds_within_eq_nhds_within {a : α} {s t u : set α}
(h₀ : a ∈ s) (h₁ : is_open s) (h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) :
nhds_within a t = nhds_within a u :=
by rw [nhds_within_restrict t h₀ h₁, nhds_within_restrict u h₀ h₁, h₂]
theorem nhds_within_eq_of_open {a : α} {s : set α} (h₀ : a ∈ s) (h₁ : is_open s) :
nhds_within a s = 𝓝 a :=
by rw [←nhds_within_univ]; apply nhds_within_eq_nhds_within h₀ h₁;
rw [set.univ_inter, set.inter_self]
@[simp] theorem nhds_within_empty (a : α) : nhds_within a {} = ⊥ :=
by rw [nhds_within, principal_empty, lattice.inf_bot_eq]
theorem nhds_within_union (a : α) (s t : set α) :
nhds_within a (s ∪ t) = nhds_within a s ⊔ nhds_within a t :=
by unfold nhds_within; rw [←lattice.inf_sup_left, sup_principal]
theorem nhds_within_inter (a : α) (s t : set α) :
nhds_within a (s ∩ t) = nhds_within a s ⊓ nhds_within a t :=
by unfold nhds_within; rw [lattice.inf_left_comm, lattice.inf_assoc, inf_principal,
←lattice.inf_assoc, lattice.inf_idem]
theorem nhds_within_inter' (a : α) (s t : set α) :
nhds_within a (s ∩ t) = (nhds_within a s) ⊓ principal t :=
by { unfold nhds_within, rw [←inf_principal, lattice.inf_assoc] }
lemma nhds_within_prod_eq {α : Type*} [topological_space α] {β : Type*} [topological_space β]
(a : α) (b : β) (s : set α) (t : set β) :
nhds_within (a, b) (s.prod t) = (nhds_within a s).prod (nhds_within b t) :=
by { unfold nhds_within, rw [nhds_prod_eq, ←filter.prod_inf_prod, filter.prod_principal_principal] }
theorem tendsto_if_nhds_within {f g : α → β} {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{a : α} {s : set α} {l : filter β}
(h₀ : tendsto f (nhds_within a (s ∩ p)) l)
(h₁ : tendsto g (nhds_within a (s ∩ {x | ¬ p x})) l) :
tendsto (λ x, if p x then f x else g x) (nhds_within a s) l :=
by apply tendsto_if; rw [←nhds_within_inter']; assumption
lemma map_nhds_within (f : α → β) (a : α) (s : set α) :
map f (nhds_within a s) =
⨅ t ∈ {t : set α | a ∈ t ∧ is_open t}, principal (set.image f (t ∩ s)) :=
have h₀ : directed_on ((λ (i : set α), principal (i ∩ s)) ⁻¹'o ge)
{x : set α | x ∈ {t : set α | a ∈ t ∧ is_open t}}, from
assume x ⟨ax, openx⟩ y ⟨ay, openy⟩,
⟨x ∩ y, ⟨⟨ax, ay⟩, is_open_inter openx openy⟩,
le_principal_iff.mpr (set.inter_subset_inter_left _ (set.inter_subset_left _ _)),
le_principal_iff.mpr (set.inter_subset_inter_left _ (set.inter_subset_right _ _))⟩,
have h₁ : ∃ (i : set α), i ∈ {t : set α | a ∈ t ∧ is_open t},
from ⟨set.univ, set.mem_univ _, is_open_univ⟩,
by { rw [nhds_within_eq, map_binfi_eq h₀ h₁], simp only [map_principal] }
theorem tendsto_nhds_within_mono_left {f : α → β} {a : α}
{s t : set α} {l : filter β} (hst : s ⊆ t) (h : tendsto f (nhds_within a t) l) :
tendsto f (nhds_within a s) l :=
tendsto_le_left (nhds_within_mono a hst) h
theorem tendsto_nhds_within_mono_right {f : β → α} {l : filter β}
{a : α} {s t : set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (h : tendsto f l (nhds_within a s)) :
tendsto f l (nhds_within a t) :=
tendsto_le_right (nhds_within_mono a hst) h
theorem tendsto_nhds_within_of_tendsto_nhds {f : α → β} {a : α}
{s : set α} {l : filter β} (h : tendsto f (𝓝 a) l) :
tendsto f (nhds_within a s) l :=
by rw [←nhds_within_univ] at h; exact tendsto_nhds_within_mono_left (set.subset_univ _) h
theorem principal_subtype {α : Type*} (s : set α) (t : set {x // x ∈ s}) :
principal t = comap subtype.val (principal (subtype.val '' t)) :=
by rw comap_principal; rw set.preimage_image_eq; apply subtype.val_injective
lemma mem_closure_iff_nhds_within_ne_bot {s : set α} {x : α} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ nhds_within x s ≠ ⊥ :=
begin
split,
{ assume hx,
rw ← forall_sets_neq_empty_iff_neq_bot,
assume o ho,
rw mem_nhds_within at ho,
rcases ho with ⟨u, u_open, xu, hu⟩,
rw mem_closure_iff at hx,
exact subset_ne_empty hu (hx u u_open xu) },
{ assume h,
rw mem_closure_iff,
rintros u u_open xu,
have : u ∩ s ∈ nhds_within x s,
{ rw mem_nhds_within,
exact ⟨u, u_open, xu, subset.refl _⟩ },
exact forall_sets_neq_empty_iff_neq_bot.2 h (u ∩ s) this }
end
lemma nhds_within_ne_bot_of_mem {s : set α} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
nhds_within x s ≠ ⊥ :=
mem_closure_iff_nhds_within_ne_bot.1 $ subset_closure hx
lemma is_closed.mem_of_nhds_within_ne_bot {s : set α} (hs : is_closed s)
{x : α} (hx : nhds_within x s ≠ ⊥) : x ∈ s :=
by simpa only [closure_eq_of_is_closed hs] using mem_closure_iff_nhds_within_ne_bot.2 hx
/-
nhds_within and subtypes
-/
theorem mem_nhds_within_subtype (s : set α) (a : {x // x ∈ s}) (t u : set {x // x ∈ s}) :
t ∈ nhds_within a u ↔
t ∈ comap (@subtype.val _ s) (nhds_within a.val (subtype.val '' u)) :=
by rw [nhds_within, nhds_subtype, principal_subtype, ←comap_inf, ←nhds_within]
theorem nhds_within_subtype (s : set α) (a : {x // x ∈ s}) (t : set {x // x ∈ s}) :
nhds_within a t = comap (@subtype.val _ s) (nhds_within a.val (subtype.val '' t)) :=
filter_eq $ by ext u; rw mem_nhds_within_subtype
theorem nhds_within_eq_map_subtype_val {s : set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) :
nhds_within a s = map subtype.val (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) :=
have h₀ : s ∈ nhds_within a s,
by { rw [mem_nhds_within], existsi set.univ, simp [set.diff_eq] },
have h₁ : ∀ y ∈ s, ∃ x, @subtype.val _ s x = y,
from λ y h, ⟨⟨y, h⟩, rfl⟩,
begin
rw [←nhds_within_univ, nhds_within_subtype, subtype.val_image_univ],
exact (map_comap_of_surjective' h₀ h₁).symm,
end
theorem tendsto_nhds_within_iff_subtype {s : set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (f : α → β) (l : filter β) :
tendsto f (nhds_within a s) l ↔ tendsto (function.restrict f s) (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) l :=
by rw [tendsto, tendsto, function.restrict, nhds_within_eq_map_subtype_val h,
←(@filter.map_map _ _ _ _ subtype.val)]
variables [topological_space β] [topological_space γ]
/-- A function between topological spaces is continuous at a point `x₀` within a subset `s`
if `f x` tends to `f x₀` when `x` tends to `x₀` while staying within `s`. -/
def continuous_within_at (f : α → β) (s : set α) (x : α) : Prop :=
tendsto f (nhds_within x s) (𝓝 (f x))
/-- If a function is continuous within `s` at `x`, then it tends to `f x` within `s` by definition.
We register this fact for use with the dot notation, especially to use `tendsto.comp` as
`continuous_within_at.comp` will have a different meaning. -/
lemma continuous_within_at.tendsto {f : α → β} {s : set α} {x : α} (h : continuous_within_at f s x) :
tendsto f (nhds_within x s) (𝓝 (f x)) := h
/-- A function between topological spaces is continuous on a subset `s`
when it's continuous at every point of `s` within `s`. -/
def continuous_on (f : α → β) (s : set α) : Prop := ∀ x ∈ s, continuous_within_at f s x
theorem continuous_within_at_univ (f : α → β) (x : α) :
continuous_within_at f set.univ x ↔ continuous_at f x :=
by rw [continuous_at, continuous_within_at, nhds_within_univ]
theorem continuous_within_at_iff_continuous_at_restrict (f : α → β) {x : α} {s : set α} (h : x ∈ s) :
continuous_within_at f s x ↔ continuous_at (function.restrict f s) ⟨x, h⟩ :=
tendsto_nhds_within_iff_subtype h f _
theorem continuous_within_at.tendsto_nhds_within_image {f : α → β} {x : α} {s : set α}
(h : continuous_within_at f s x) :
tendsto f (nhds_within x s) (nhds_within (f x) (f '' s)) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h, tendsto_principal.2 $
mem_inf_sets_of_right $ mem_principal_sets.2 $
λ x, mem_image_of_mem _⟩
theorem continuous_on_iff {f : α → β} {s : set α} :
continuous_on f s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ t : set β, is_open t → f x ∈ t → ∃ u, is_open u ∧ x ∈ u ∧
u ∩ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
by simp only [continuous_on, continuous_within_at, tendsto_nhds, mem_nhds_within]
theorem continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict {f : α → β} {s : set α} :
continuous_on f s ↔ continuous (function.restrict f s) :=
begin
rw [continuous_on, continuous_iff_continuous_at], split,
{ rintros h ⟨x, xs⟩,
exact (continuous_within_at_iff_continuous_at_restrict f xs).mp (h x xs) },
intros h x xs,
exact (continuous_within_at_iff_continuous_at_restrict f xs).mpr (h ⟨x, xs⟩)
end
theorem continuous_on_iff' {f : α → β} {s : set α} :
continuous_on f s ↔ ∀ t : set β, is_open t → ∃ u, is_open u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s :=
have ∀ t, is_open (function.restrict f s ⁻¹' t) ↔ ∃ (u : set α), is_open u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s,
begin
intro t,
rw [is_open_induced_iff, function.restrict_eq, set.preimage_comp],
simp only [subtype.preimage_val_eq_preimage_val_iff],
split; { rintros ⟨u, ou, useq⟩, exact ⟨u, ou, useq.symm⟩ }
end,
by rw [continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict, continuous]; simp only [this]
theorem continuous_on_iff_is_closed {f : α → β} {s : set α} :
continuous_on f s ↔ ∀ t : set β, is_closed t → ∃ u, is_closed u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s :=
have ∀ t, is_closed (function.restrict f s ⁻¹' t) ↔ ∃ (u : set α), is_closed u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s,
begin
intro t,
rw [is_closed_induced_iff, function.restrict_eq, set.preimage_comp],
simp only [subtype.preimage_val_eq_preimage_val_iff]
end,
by rw [continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict, continuous_iff_is_closed]; simp only [this]
theorem nhds_within_le_comap {x : α} {s : set α} {f : α → β} (ctsf : continuous_within_at f s x) :
nhds_within x s ≤ comap f (nhds_within (f x) (f '' s)) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.1 ctsf.tendsto_nhds_within_image
theorem continuous_within_at_iff_ptendsto_res (f : α → β) {x : α} {s : set α} :
continuous_within_at f s x ↔ ptendsto (pfun.res f s) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 (f x)) :=
tendsto_iff_ptendsto _ _ _ _
lemma continuous_iff_continuous_on_univ {f : α → β} : continuous f ↔ continuous_on f univ :=
by simp [continuous_iff_continuous_at, continuous_on, continuous_at, continuous_within_at,
nhds_within_univ]
lemma continuous_within_at.mono {f : α → β} {s t : set α} {x : α} (h : continuous_within_at f t x)
(hs : s ⊆ t) : continuous_within_at f s x :=
tendsto_le_left (nhds_within_mono x hs) h
lemma continuous_within_at_inter' {f : α → β} {s t : set α} {x : α} (h : t ∈ nhds_within x s) :
continuous_within_at f (s ∩ t) x ↔ continuous_within_at f s x :=
by simp [continuous_within_at, nhds_within_restrict'' s h]
lemma continuous_within_at_inter {f : α → β} {s t : set α} {x : α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
continuous_within_at f (s ∩ t) x ↔ continuous_within_at f s x :=
by simp [continuous_within_at, nhds_within_restrict' s h]
lemma continuous_within_at.mem_closure_image {f : α → β} {s : set α} {x : α}
(h : continuous_within_at f s x) (hx : x ∈ closure s) : f x ∈ closure (f '' s) :=
mem_closure_of_tendsto (mem_closure_iff_nhds_within_ne_bot.1 hx) h $
mem_sets_of_superset self_mem_nhds_within (subset_preimage_image f s)
lemma continuous_within_at.mem_closure {f : α → β} {s : set α} {x : α} {A : set β}
(h : continuous_within_at f s x) (hx : x ∈ closure s) (hA : s ⊆ f⁻¹' A) : f x ∈ closure A :=
closure_mono (image_subset_iff.2 hA) (h.mem_closure_image hx)
lemma continuous_within_at.image_closure {f : α → β} {s : set α}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ closure s, continuous_within_at f s x) :
f '' (closure s) ⊆ closure (f '' s) :=
begin
rintros _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩,
exact (hf x hx).mem_closure_image hx
end
lemma continuous_on.congr_mono {f g : α → β} {s s₁ : set α} (h : continuous_on f s)
(h' : ∀x ∈ s₁, g x = f x) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) : continuous_on g s₁ :=
begin
assume x hx,
unfold continuous_within_at,
have A := (h x (h₁ hx)).mono h₁,
unfold continuous_within_at at A,
rw ← h' x hx at A,
have : {x : α | g x = f x} ∈ nhds_within x s₁ := mem_inf_sets_of_right h',
apply tendsto.congr' _ A,
convert this,
ext,
finish
end
lemma continuous_on.congr {f g : α → β} {s : set α} (h : continuous_on f s)
(h' : ∀x ∈ s, g x = f x) : continuous_on g s :=
h.congr_mono h' (subset.refl _)
lemma continuous_at.continuous_within_at {f : α → β} {s : set α} {x : α} (h : continuous_at f x) :
continuous_within_at f s x :=
continuous_within_at.mono ((continuous_within_at_univ f x).2 h) (subset_univ _)
lemma continuous_within_at.continuous_at {f : α → β} {s : set α} {x : α}
(h : continuous_within_at f s x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : continuous_at f x :=
begin
have : s = univ ∩ s, by rw univ_inter,
rwa [this, continuous_within_at_inter hs, continuous_within_at_univ] at h
end
lemma continuous_within_at.comp {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : set α} {t : set β} {x : α}
(hg : continuous_within_at g t (f x)) (hf : continuous_within_at f s x) (h : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t) :
continuous_within_at (g ∘ f) s x :=
begin
have : tendsto f (principal s) (principal t),
by { rw tendsto_principal_principal, exact λx hx, h hx },
have : tendsto f (nhds_within x s) (principal t) :=
tendsto_le_left lattice.inf_le_right this,
have : tendsto f (nhds_within x s) (nhds_within (f x) t) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨hf, this⟩,
exact tendsto.comp hg this
end
lemma continuous_on.comp {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : set α} {t : set β}
(hg : continuous_on g t) (hf : continuous_on f s) (h : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t) :
continuous_on (g ∘ f) s :=
λx hx, continuous_within_at.comp (hg _ (h hx)) (hf x hx) h
lemma continuous_on.mono {f : α → β} {s t : set α} (hf : continuous_on f s) (h : t ⊆ s) :
continuous_on f t :=
λx hx, tendsto_le_left (nhds_within_mono _ h) (hf x (h hx))
lemma continuous.continuous_on {f : α → β} {s : set α} (h : continuous f) :
continuous_on f s :=
begin
rw continuous_iff_continuous_on_univ at h,
exact h.mono (subset_univ _)
end
lemma continuous.continuous_within_at {f : α → β} {s : set α} {x : α} (h : continuous f) :
continuous_within_at f s x :=
tendsto_le_left lattice.inf_le_left (h.tendsto x)
lemma continuous.comp_continuous_on {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : set α}
(hg : continuous g) (hf : continuous_on f s) :
continuous_on (g ∘ f) s :=
hg.continuous_on.comp hf subset_preimage_univ
lemma continuous_within_at.preimage_mem_nhds_within {f : α → β} {x : α} {s : set α} {t : set β}
(h : continuous_within_at f s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 (f x)) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ nhds_within x s :=
h ht
lemma continuous_within_at.preimage_mem_nhds_within' {f : α → β} {x : α} {s : set α} {t : set β}
(h : continuous_within_at f s x) (ht : t ∈ nhds_within (f x) (f '' s)) :
f ⁻¹' t ∈ nhds_within x s :=
begin
rw mem_nhds_within at ht,
rcases ht with ⟨u, u_open, fxu, hu⟩,
have : f ⁻¹' u ∩ s ∈ nhds_within x s :=
filter.inter_mem_sets (h (mem_nhds_sets u_open fxu)) self_mem_nhds_within,
apply mem_sets_of_superset this,
calc f ⁻¹' u ∩ s
⊆ f ⁻¹' u ∩ f ⁻¹' (f '' s) : inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_preimage_image f s)
... = f ⁻¹' (u ∩ f '' s) : rfl
... ⊆ f ⁻¹' t : preimage_mono hu
end
lemma continuous_within_at.congr_of_mem_nhds_within {f f₁ : α → β} {s : set α} {x : α}
(h : continuous_within_at f s x) (h₁ : {y | f₁ y = f y} ∈ nhds_within x s) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
continuous_within_at f₁ s x :=
by rwa [continuous_within_at, filter.tendsto, hx, filter.map_cong h₁]
lemma continuous_within_at.congr {f f₁ : α → β} {s : set α} {x : α}
(h : continuous_within_at f s x) (h₁ : ∀y∈s, f₁ y = f y) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
continuous_within_at f₁ s x :=
h.congr_of_mem_nhds_within (mem_sets_of_superset self_mem_nhds_within h₁) hx
lemma continuous_on_const {s : set α} {c : β} : continuous_on (λx, c) s :=
continuous_const.continuous_on
lemma continuous_on_open_iff {f : α → β} {s : set α} (hs : is_open s) :
continuous_on f s ↔ (∀t, _root_.is_open t → is_open (s ∩ f⁻¹' t)) :=
begin
rw continuous_on_iff',
split,
{ assume h t ht,
rcases h t ht with ⟨u, u_open, hu⟩,
rw [inter_comm, hu],
apply is_open_inter u_open hs },
{ assume h t ht,
refine ⟨s ∩ f ⁻¹' t, h t ht, _⟩,
rw [@inter_comm _ s (f ⁻¹' t), inter_assoc, inter_self] }
end
lemma continuous_on.preimage_open_of_open {f : α → β} {s : set α} {t : set β}
(hf : continuous_on f s) (hs : is_open s) (ht : is_open t) : is_open (s ∩ f⁻¹' t) :=
(continuous_on_open_iff hs).1 hf t ht
lemma continuous_on.preimage_closed_of_closed {f : α → β} {s : set α} {t : set β}
(hf : continuous_on f s) (hs : is_closed s) (ht : is_closed t) : is_closed (s ∩ f⁻¹' t) :=
begin
rcases continuous_on_iff_is_closed.1 hf t ht with ⟨u, hu⟩,
rw [inter_comm, hu.2],
apply is_closed_inter hu.1 hs
end
lemma continuous_on.preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage {f : α → β} {s : set α} {t : set β}
(hf : continuous_on f s) (hs : is_open s) : s ∩ f⁻¹' (interior t) ⊆ s ∩ interior (f⁻¹' t) :=
calc s ∩ f ⁻¹' (interior t)
= interior (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (interior t)) :
(interior_eq_of_open (hf.preimage_open_of_open hs is_open_interior)).symm
... ⊆ interior (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) :
interior_mono (inter_subset_inter (subset.refl _) (preimage_mono interior_subset))
... = s ∩ interior (f ⁻¹' t) :
by rw [interior_inter, interior_eq_of_open hs]
lemma continuous_on_of_locally_continuous_on {f : α → β} {s : set α}
(h : ∀x∈s, ∃t, is_open t ∧ x ∈ t ∧ continuous_on f (s ∩ t)) : continuous_on f s :=
begin
assume x xs,
rcases h x xs with ⟨t, open_t, xt, ct⟩,
have := ct x ⟨xs, xt⟩,
rwa [continuous_within_at, ← nhds_within_restrict _ xt open_t] at this
end
lemma continuous_on_open_of_generate_from {β : Type*} {s : set α} {T : set (set β)} {f : α → β}
(hs : is_open s) (h : ∀t ∈ T, is_open (s ∩ f⁻¹' t)) :
@continuous_on α β _ (topological_space.generate_from T) f s :=
begin
rw continuous_on_open_iff,
assume t ht,
induction ht with u hu u v Tu Tv hu hv U hU hU',
{ exact h u hu },
{ simp only [preimage_univ, inter_univ], exact hs },
{ have : s ∩ f ⁻¹' (u ∩ v) = (s ∩ f ⁻¹' u) ∩ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' v),
by { ext x, simp, split, finish, finish },
rw this,
exact is_open_inter hu hv },
{ rw [preimage_sUnion, inter_bUnion],
exact is_open_bUnion hU' },
{ exact hs }
end
lemma continuous_within_at.prod {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {s : set α} {x : α}
(hf : continuous_within_at f s x) (hg : continuous_within_at g s x) :
continuous_within_at (λx, (f x, g x)) s x :=
tendsto_prod_mk_nhds hf hg
lemma continuous_on.prod {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {s : set α}
(hf : continuous_on f s) (hg : continuous_on g s) : continuous_on (λx, (f x, g x)) s :=
λx hx, continuous_within_at.prod (hf x hx) (hg x hx)
|
e45ea02a92075056d3152998a5c560870832be52 | e0f9ba56b7fedc16ef8697f6caeef5898b435143 | /src/data/real/cau_seq.lean | 479a1b7ebd2c348601adac3899b5bdddcd71bf19 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | anrddh/mathlib | 6a374da53c7e3a35cb0298b0cd67824efef362b4 | a4266a01d2dcb10de19369307c986d038c7bb6a6 | refs/heads/master | 1,656,710,827,909 | 1,589,560,456,000 | 1,589,560,456,000 | 264,271,800 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,589,568,062,000 | 1,589,568,061,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 24,816 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import algebra.big_operators
/-!
# Cauchy sequences
A basic theory of Cauchy sequences, used in the construction of the reals and p-adic numbers. Where
applicable, lemmas that will be reused in other contexts have been stated in extra generality.
There are other "versions" of Cauchyness in the library, in particular Cauchy filters in topology.
This is a concrete implementation that is useful for simplicity and computability reasons.
## Important definitions
* `is_absolute_value`: a type class stating that `f : β → α` satisfies the axioms of an abs val
* `is_cau_seq`: a predicate that says `f : ℕ → β` is Cauchy.
## Tags
sequence, cauchy, abs val, absolute value
-/
/-- A function f is an absolute value if it is nonnegative, zero only at 0, additive, and
multiplicative. -/
class is_absolute_value {α} [discrete_linear_ordered_field α]
{β} [ring β] (f : β → α) : Prop :=
(abv_nonneg [] : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x)
(abv_eq_zero [] : ∀ {x}, f x = 0 ↔ x = 0)
(abv_add [] : ∀ x y, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y)
(abv_mul [] : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y)
namespace is_absolute_value
variables {α : Type*} [discrete_linear_ordered_field α]
{β : Type*} [ring β] (abv : β → α) [is_absolute_value abv]
theorem abv_zero : abv 0 = 0 := (abv_eq_zero abv).2 rfl
theorem abv_one' (h : (1:β) ≠ 0) : abv 1 = 1 :=
(domain.mul_right_inj $ mt (abv_eq_zero abv).1 h).1 $
by rw [← abv_mul abv, mul_one, mul_one]
theorem abv_one
{β : Type*} [domain β] (abv : β → α) [is_absolute_value abv] :
abv 1 = 1 := abv_one' abv one_ne_zero
theorem abv_pos {a : β} : 0 < abv a ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
by rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, ne, eq_comm]; simp [abv_eq_zero abv, abv_nonneg abv]
theorem abv_neg (a : β) : abv (-a) = abv a :=
by rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (abv_nonneg abv _) (abv_nonneg abv _),
← abv_mul abv, ← abv_mul abv]; simp
theorem abv_sub (a b : β) : abv (a - b) = abv (b - a) :=
by rw [← neg_sub, abv_neg abv]
theorem abv_inv
{β : Type*} [field β] (abv : β → α) [is_absolute_value abv]
(a : β) : abv a⁻¹ = (abv a)⁻¹ :=
classical.by_cases
(λ h : a = 0, by simp [h, abv_zero abv])
(λ h, (domain.mul_left_inj (mt (abv_eq_zero abv).1 h)).1 $
by rw [← abv_mul abv]; simp [h, mt (abv_eq_zero abv).1 h, abv_one abv])
theorem abv_div
{β : Type*} [field β] (abv : β → α) [is_absolute_value abv]
(a b : β) : abv (a / b) = abv a / abv b :=
by rw [division_def, abv_mul abv, abv_inv abv]; refl
lemma abv_sub_le (a b c : β) : abv (a - c) ≤ abv (a - b) + abv (b - c) :=
by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using abv_add abv (a - b) (b - c)
lemma sub_abv_le_abv_sub (a b : β) : abv a - abv b ≤ abv (a - b) :=
sub_le_iff_le_add.2 $ by simpa using abv_add abv (a - b) b
lemma abs_abv_sub_le_abv_sub (a b : β) :
abs (abv a - abv b) ≤ abv (a - b) :=
abs_sub_le_iff.2 ⟨sub_abv_le_abv_sub abv _ _,
by rw abv_sub abv; apply sub_abv_le_abv_sub abv⟩
lemma abv_pow {β : Type*} [domain β] (abv : β → α) [is_absolute_value abv]
(a : β) (n : ℕ) : abv (a ^ n) = abv a ^ n :=
by induction n; simp [abv_mul abv, _root_.pow_succ, abv_one abv, *]
end is_absolute_value
instance abs_is_absolute_value {α} [discrete_linear_ordered_field α] :
is_absolute_value (abs : α → α) :=
{ abv_nonneg := abs_nonneg,
abv_eq_zero := λ _, abs_eq_zero,
abv_add := abs_add,
abv_mul := abs_mul }
open is_absolute_value
theorem exists_forall_ge_and {α} [linear_order α] {P Q : α → Prop} :
(∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, P j) → (∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, Q j) →
∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, P j ∧ Q j
| ⟨a, h₁⟩ ⟨b, h₂⟩ := let ⟨c, ac, bc⟩ := exists_ge_of_linear a b in
⟨c, λ j hj, ⟨h₁ _ (le_trans ac hj), h₂ _ (le_trans bc hj)⟩⟩
section
variables {α : Type*} [discrete_linear_ordered_field α]
{β : Type*} [ring β] (abv : β → α) [is_absolute_value abv]
theorem rat_add_continuous_lemma
{ε : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : β},
abv (a₁ - b₁) < δ → abv (a₂ - b₂) < δ → abv (a₁ + a₂ - (b₁ + b₂)) < ε :=
⟨ε / 2, half_pos ε0, λ a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ h₁ h₂,
by simpa [add_halves, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm]
using lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add h₁ h₂)⟩
theorem rat_mul_continuous_lemma
{ε K₁ K₂ : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : β}, abv a₁ < K₁ → abv b₂ < K₂ →
abv (a₁ - b₁) < δ → abv (a₂ - b₂) < δ → abv (a₁ * a₂ - b₁ * b₂) < ε :=
begin
have K0 : (0 : α) < max 1 (max K₁ K₂) := lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (le_max_left _ _),
have εK := div_pos (half_pos ε0) K0,
refine ⟨_, εK, λ a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ ha₁ hb₂ h₁ h₂, _⟩,
replace ha₁ := lt_of_lt_of_le ha₁ (le_trans (le_max_left _ K₂) (le_max_right 1 _)),
replace hb₂ := lt_of_lt_of_le hb₂ (le_trans (le_max_right K₁ _) (le_max_right 1 _)),
have := add_lt_add
(mul_lt_mul' (le_of_lt h₁) hb₂ (abv_nonneg abv _) εK)
(mul_lt_mul' (le_of_lt h₂) ha₁ (abv_nonneg abv _) εK),
rw [← abv_mul abv, mul_comm, div_mul_cancel _ (ne_of_gt K0), ← abv_mul abv, add_halves] at this,
simpa [mul_add, add_mul, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm]
using lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) this
end
theorem rat_inv_continuous_lemma
{β : Type*} [field β] (abv : β → α) [is_absolute_value abv]
{ε K : α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) (K0 : 0 < K) :
∃ δ > 0, ∀ {a b : β}, K ≤ abv a → K ≤ abv b →
abv (a - b) < δ → abv (a⁻¹ - b⁻¹) < ε :=
begin
have KK := mul_pos K0 K0,
have εK := mul_pos ε0 KK,
refine ⟨_, εK, λ a b ha hb h, _⟩,
have a0 := lt_of_lt_of_le K0 ha,
have b0 := lt_of_lt_of_le K0 hb,
rw [inv_sub_inv ((abv_pos abv).1 a0) ((abv_pos abv).1 b0),
abv_div abv, abv_mul abv, mul_comm, abv_sub abv,
← mul_div_cancel ε (ne_of_gt KK)],
exact div_lt_div h
(mul_le_mul hb ha (le_of_lt K0) (abv_nonneg abv _))
(le_of_lt $ mul_pos ε0 KK) KK
end
end
/-- A sequence is Cauchy if the distance between its entries tends to zero. -/
def is_cau_seq {α : Type*} [discrete_linear_ordered_field α]
{β : Type*} [ring β] (abv : β → α) (f : ℕ → β) :=
∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j - f i) < ε
namespace is_cau_seq
variables {α : Type*} [discrete_linear_ordered_field α]
{β : Type*} [ring β] {abv : β → α} [is_absolute_value abv] {f : ℕ → β}
theorem cauchy₂ (hf : is_cau_seq abv f) {ε:α} (ε0 : ε > 0) :
∃ i, ∀ j k ≥ i, abv (f j - f k) < ε :=
begin
refine (hf _ (half_pos ε0)).imp (λ i hi j k ij ik, _),
rw ← add_halves ε,
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_sub_le abv _ _ _) (add_lt_add (hi _ ij) _),
rw abv_sub abv, exact hi _ ik
end
theorem cauchy₃ (hf : is_cau_seq abv f) {ε:α} (ε0 : ε > 0) :
∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ j, abv (f k - f j) < ε :=
let ⟨i, H⟩ := hf.cauchy₂ ε0 in ⟨i, λ j ij k jk, H _ _ (le_trans ij jk) ij⟩
end is_cau_seq
def cau_seq {α : Type*} [discrete_linear_ordered_field α]
(β : Type*) [ring β] (abv : β → α) :=
{f : ℕ → β // is_cau_seq abv f}
namespace cau_seq
variables {α : Type*} [discrete_linear_ordered_field α]
section ring
variables {β : Type*} [ring β] {abv : β → α}
instance : has_coe_to_fun (cau_seq β abv) := ⟨_, subtype.val⟩
@[simp] theorem mk_to_fun (f) (hf : is_cau_seq abv f) :
@coe_fn (cau_seq β abv) _ ⟨f, hf⟩ = f := rfl
theorem ext {f g : cau_seq β abv} (h : ∀ i, f i = g i) : f = g :=
subtype.eq (funext h)
theorem is_cau (f : cau_seq β abv) : is_cau_seq abv f := f.2
theorem cauchy (f : cau_seq β abv) :
∀ {ε}, ε > 0 → ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j - f i) < ε := f.2
def of_eq (f : cau_seq β abv) (g : ℕ → β) (e : ∀ i, f i = g i) : cau_seq β abv :=
⟨g, λ ε, by rw [show g = f, from (funext e).symm]; exact f.cauchy⟩
variable [is_absolute_value abv]
theorem cauchy₂ (f : cau_seq β abv) {ε:α} : ε > 0 →
∃ i, ∀ j k ≥ i, abv (f j - f k) < ε := f.2.cauchy₂
theorem cauchy₃ (f : cau_seq β abv) {ε:α} : ε > 0 →
∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ j, abv (f k - f j) < ε := f.2.cauchy₃
theorem bounded (f : cau_seq β abv) : ∃ r, ∀ i, abv (f i) < r :=
begin
cases f.cauchy zero_lt_one with i h,
let R := (finset.range (i+1)).sum (λ j, abv (f j)),
have : ∀ j ≤ i, abv (f j) ≤ R,
{ intros j ij, change (λ j, abv (f j)) j ≤ R,
apply finset.single_le_sum,
{ intros, apply abv_nonneg abv },
{ rwa [finset.mem_range, nat.lt_succ_iff] } },
refine ⟨R + 1, λ j, _⟩,
cases lt_or_le j i with ij ij,
{ exact lt_of_le_of_lt (this _ (le_of_lt ij)) (lt_add_one _) },
{ have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _)
(add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt (this _ (le_refl _)) (h _ ij)),
rw [add_sub, add_comm] at this, simpa }
end
theorem bounded' (f : cau_seq β abv) (x : α) : ∃ r > x, ∀ i, abv (f i) < r :=
let ⟨r, h⟩ := f.bounded in
⟨max r (x+1), lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_add_one _) (le_max_right _ _),
λ i, lt_of_lt_of_le (h i) (le_max_left _ _)⟩
instance : has_add (cau_seq β abv) :=
⟨λ f g, ⟨λ i, (f i + g i : β), λ ε ε0,
let ⟨δ, δ0, Hδ⟩ := rat_add_continuous_lemma abv ε0,
⟨i, H⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and (f.cauchy₃ δ0) (g.cauchy₃ δ0) in
⟨i, λ j ij, let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ (le_refl _) in Hδ (H₁ _ ij) (H₂ _ ij)⟩⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem add_apply (f g : cau_seq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (f + g) i = f i + g i := rfl
variable (abv)
/-- The constant Cauchy sequence. -/
def const (x : β) : cau_seq β abv :=
⟨λ i, x, λ ε ε0, ⟨0, λ j ij, by simpa [abv_zero abv] using ε0⟩⟩
variable {abv}
local notation `const` := const abv
@[simp] theorem const_apply (x : β) (i : ℕ) : (const x : ℕ → β) i = x := rfl
theorem const_inj {x y : β} : (const x : cau_seq β abv) = const y ↔ x = y :=
⟨λ h, congr_arg (λ f:cau_seq β abv, (f:ℕ→β) 0) h, congr_arg _⟩
instance : has_zero (cau_seq β abv) := ⟨const 0⟩
instance : has_one (cau_seq β abv) := ⟨const 1⟩
instance : inhabited (cau_seq β abv) := ⟨0⟩
@[simp] theorem zero_apply (i) : (0 : cau_seq β abv) i = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem one_apply (i) : (1 : cau_seq β abv) i = 1 := rfl
theorem const_add (x y : β) : const (x + y) = const x + const y :=
ext $ λ i, rfl
instance : has_mul (cau_seq β abv) :=
⟨λ f g, ⟨λ i, (f i * g i : β), λ ε ε0,
let ⟨F, F0, hF⟩ := f.bounded' 0, ⟨G, G0, hG⟩ := g.bounded' 0,
⟨δ, δ0, Hδ⟩ := rat_mul_continuous_lemma abv ε0,
⟨i, H⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and (f.cauchy₃ δ0) (g.cauchy₃ δ0) in
⟨i, λ j ij, let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ (le_refl _) in
Hδ (hF j) (hG i) (H₁ _ ij) (H₂ _ ij)⟩⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem mul_apply (f g : cau_seq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (f * g) i = f i * g i := rfl
theorem const_mul (x y : β) : const (x * y) = const x * const y :=
ext $ λ i, rfl
instance : has_neg (cau_seq β abv) :=
⟨λ f, of_eq (const (-1) * f) (λ x, -f x) (λ i, by simp)⟩
@[simp] theorem neg_apply (f : cau_seq β abv) (i) : (-f) i = -f i := rfl
theorem const_neg (x : β) : const (-x) = -const x :=
ext $ λ i, rfl
instance : ring (cau_seq β abv) :=
by refine {neg := has_neg.neg, add := (+), zero := 0, mul := (*), one := 1, ..};
{ intros, apply ext, simp [mul_add, mul_assoc, add_mul, add_comm, add_left_comm] }
instance {β : Type*} [comm_ring β] {abv : β → α} [is_absolute_value abv] : comm_ring (cau_seq β abv) :=
{ mul_comm := by intros; apply ext; simp [mul_left_comm, mul_comm],
..cau_seq.ring }
theorem const_sub (x y : β) : const (x - y) = const x - const y :=
by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, const_add, const_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp] theorem sub_apply (f g : cau_seq β abv) (i : ℕ) : (f - g) i = f i - g i := rfl
/-- `lim_zero f` holds when `f` approaches 0. -/
def lim_zero (f : cau_seq β abv) := ∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j) < ε
theorem add_lim_zero {f g : cau_seq β abv}
(hf : lim_zero f) (hg : lim_zero g) : lim_zero (f + g)
| ε ε0 := (exists_forall_ge_and
(hf _ $ half_pos ε0) (hg _ $ half_pos ε0)).imp $
λ i H j ij, let ⟨H₁, H₂⟩ := H _ ij in
by simpa [add_halves ε] using lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add H₁ H₂)
theorem mul_lim_zero_right (f : cau_seq β abv) {g}
(hg : lim_zero g) : lim_zero (f * g)
| ε ε0 := let ⟨F, F0, hF⟩ := f.bounded' 0 in
(hg _ $ div_pos ε0 F0).imp $ λ i H j ij,
by have := mul_lt_mul' (le_of_lt $ hF j) (H _ ij) (abv_nonneg abv _) F0;
rwa [mul_comm F, div_mul_cancel _ (ne_of_gt F0), ← abv_mul abv] at this
theorem mul_lim_zero_left {f} (g : cau_seq β abv)
(hg : lim_zero f) : lim_zero (f * g)
| ε ε0 := let ⟨G, G0, hG⟩ := g.bounded' 0 in
(hg _ $ div_pos ε0 G0).imp $ λ i H j ij,
by have := mul_lt_mul'' (H _ ij) (hG j) (abv_nonneg abv _) (abv_nonneg abv _);
rwa [div_mul_cancel _ (ne_of_gt G0), ← abv_mul abv] at this
theorem neg_lim_zero {f : cau_seq β abv} (hf : lim_zero f) : lim_zero (-f) :=
by rw ← neg_one_mul; exact mul_lim_zero_right _ hf
theorem sub_lim_zero {f g : cau_seq β abv}
(hf : lim_zero f) (hg : lim_zero g) : lim_zero (f - g) :=
add_lim_zero hf (neg_lim_zero hg)
theorem lim_zero_sub_rev {f g : cau_seq β abv} (hfg : lim_zero (f - g)) : lim_zero (g - f) :=
by simpa using neg_lim_zero hfg
theorem zero_lim_zero : lim_zero (0 : cau_seq β abv)
| ε ε0 := ⟨0, λ j ij, by simpa [abv_zero abv] using ε0⟩
theorem const_lim_zero {x : β} : lim_zero (const x) ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨λ H, (abv_eq_zero abv).1 $
eq_of_le_of_forall_le_of_dense (abv_nonneg abv _) $
λ ε ε0, let ⟨i, hi⟩ := H _ ε0 in le_of_lt $ hi _ (le_refl _),
λ e, e.symm ▸ zero_lim_zero⟩
instance equiv : setoid (cau_seq β abv) :=
⟨λ f g, lim_zero (f - g),
⟨λ f, by simp [zero_lim_zero],
λ f g h, by simpa using neg_lim_zero h,
λ f g h fg gh, by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using add_lim_zero fg gh⟩⟩
theorem equiv_def₃ {f g : cau_seq β abv} (h : f ≈ g) {ε:α} (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, ∀ k ≥ j, abv (f k - g j) < ε :=
(exists_forall_ge_and (h _ $ half_pos ε0) (f.cauchy₃ $ half_pos ε0)).imp $
λ i H j ij k jk, let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := H _ ij in
by have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv (f j - g j) _) (add_lt_add h₁ (h₂ _ jk));
rwa [sub_add_sub_cancel', add_halves] at this
theorem lim_zero_congr {f g : cau_seq β abv} (h : f ≈ g) : lim_zero f ↔ lim_zero g :=
⟨λ l, by simpa using add_lim_zero (setoid.symm h) l,
λ l, by simpa using add_lim_zero h l⟩
theorem abv_pos_of_not_lim_zero {f : cau_seq β abv} (hf : ¬ lim_zero f) :
∃ K > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, K ≤ abv (f j) :=
begin
haveI := classical.prop_decidable,
by_contra nk,
refine hf (λ ε ε0, _),
simp [not_forall] at nk,
cases f.cauchy₃ (half_pos ε0) with i hi,
rcases nk _ (half_pos ε0) i with ⟨j, ij, hj⟩,
refine ⟨j, λ k jk, _⟩,
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add (hi j ij k jk) hj),
rwa [sub_add_cancel, add_halves] at this
end
theorem of_near (f : ℕ → β) (g : cau_seq β abv)
(h : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv (f j - g j) < ε) : is_cau_seq abv f
| ε ε0 :=
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and
(h _ (half_pos $ half_pos ε0)) (g.cauchy₃ $ half_pos ε0) in
⟨i, λ j ij, begin
cases hi _ (le_refl _) with h₁ h₂, rw abv_sub abv at h₁,
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add (hi _ ij).1 h₁),
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (abv_add abv _ _) (add_lt_add this (h₂ _ ij)),
rwa [add_halves, add_halves, add_right_comm,
sub_add_sub_cancel, sub_add_sub_cancel] at this
end⟩
lemma not_lim_zero_of_not_congr_zero {f : cau_seq _ abv} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) : ¬ lim_zero f :=
assume : lim_zero f,
have lim_zero (f - 0), by simpa,
hf this
lemma mul_equiv_zero (g : cau_seq _ abv) {f : cau_seq _ abv} (hf : f ≈ 0) : g * f ≈ 0 :=
have lim_zero (f - 0), from hf,
have lim_zero (g*f), from mul_lim_zero_right _ $ by simpa,
show lim_zero (g*f - 0), by simpa
lemma mul_not_equiv_zero {f g : cau_seq _ abv} (hf : ¬ f ≈ 0) (hg : ¬ g ≈ 0) : ¬ (f * g) ≈ 0 :=
assume : lim_zero (f*g - 0),
have hlz : lim_zero (f*g), by simpa,
have hf' : ¬ lim_zero f, by simpa using (show ¬ lim_zero (f - 0), from hf),
have hg' : ¬ lim_zero g, by simpa using (show ¬ lim_zero (g - 0), from hg),
begin
rcases abv_pos_of_not_lim_zero hf' with ⟨a1, ha1, N1, hN1⟩,
rcases abv_pos_of_not_lim_zero hg' with ⟨a2, ha2, N2, hN2⟩,
have : a1 * a2 > 0, from mul_pos ha1 ha2,
cases hlz _ this with N hN,
let i := max N (max N1 N2),
have hN' := hN i (le_max_left _ _),
have hN1' := hN1 i (le_trans (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_right _ _)),
have hN1' := hN2 i (le_trans (le_max_right _ _) (le_max_right _ _)),
apply not_le_of_lt hN',
change _ ≤ abv (_ * _),
rw is_absolute_value.abv_mul abv,
apply mul_le_mul; try { assumption },
{ apply le_of_lt ha2 },
{ apply is_absolute_value.abv_nonneg abv }
end
theorem const_equiv {x y : β} : const x ≈ const y ↔ x = y :=
show lim_zero _ ↔ _, by rw [← const_sub, const_lim_zero, sub_eq_zero]
end ring
section comm_ring
variables {β : Type*} [comm_ring β] {abv : β → α} [is_absolute_value abv]
lemma mul_equiv_zero' (g : cau_seq _ abv) {f : cau_seq _ abv} (hf : f ≈ 0) : f * g ≈ 0 :=
by rw mul_comm; apply mul_equiv_zero _ hf
end comm_ring
section integral_domain
variables {β : Type*} [integral_domain β] (abv : β → α) [is_absolute_value abv]
lemma one_not_equiv_zero : ¬ (const abv 1) ≈ (const abv 0) :=
assume h,
have ∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ k, k ≥ i → abv (1 - 0) < ε, from h,
have h1 : abv 1 ≤ 0, from le_of_not_gt $
assume h2 : abv 1 > 0,
exists.elim (this _ h2) $ λ i hi,
lt_irrefl (abv 1) $ by simpa using hi _ (le_refl _),
have h2 : abv 1 ≥ 0, from is_absolute_value.abv_nonneg _ _,
have abv 1 = 0, from le_antisymm h1 h2,
have (1 : β) = 0, from (is_absolute_value.abv_eq_zero abv).1 this,
absurd this one_ne_zero
end integral_domain
section field
variables {β : Type*} [field β] {abv : β → α} [is_absolute_value abv]
theorem inv_aux {f : cau_seq β abv} (hf : ¬ lim_zero f) :
∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, abv ((f j)⁻¹ - (f i)⁻¹) < ε | ε ε0 :=
let ⟨K, K0, HK⟩ := abv_pos_of_not_lim_zero hf,
⟨δ, δ0, Hδ⟩ := rat_inv_continuous_lemma abv ε0 K0,
⟨i, H⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and HK (f.cauchy₃ δ0) in
⟨i, λ j ij, let ⟨iK, H'⟩ := H _ (le_refl _) in Hδ (H _ ij).1 iK (H' _ ij)⟩
def inv (f) (hf : ¬ lim_zero f) : cau_seq β abv := ⟨_, inv_aux hf⟩
@[simp] theorem inv_apply {f : cau_seq β abv} (hf i) : inv f hf i = (f i)⁻¹ := rfl
theorem inv_mul_cancel {f : cau_seq β abv} (hf) : inv f hf * f ≈ 1 :=
λ ε ε0, let ⟨K, K0, i, H⟩ := abv_pos_of_not_lim_zero hf in
⟨i, λ j ij,
by simpa [(abv_pos abv).1 (lt_of_lt_of_le K0 (H _ ij)),
abv_zero abv] using ε0⟩
theorem const_inv {x : β} (hx : x ≠ 0) : const abv (x⁻¹) = inv (const abv x) (by rwa const_lim_zero) :=
ext (assume n, by simp[inv_apply, const_apply])
end field
section abs
local notation `const` := const abs
/-- The entries of a positive Cauchy sequence eventually have a positive lower bound. -/
def pos (f : cau_seq α abs) : Prop := ∃ K > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, K ≤ f j
theorem not_lim_zero_of_pos {f : cau_seq α abs} : pos f → ¬ lim_zero f
| ⟨F, F0, hF⟩ H :=
let ⟨i, h⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and hF (H _ F0),
⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h _ (le_refl _) in
not_lt_of_le h₁ (abs_lt.1 h₂).2
theorem const_pos {x : α} : pos (const x) ↔ 0 < x :=
⟨λ ⟨K, K0, i, h⟩, lt_of_lt_of_le K0 (h _ (le_refl _)),
λ h, ⟨x, h, 0, λ j _, le_refl _⟩⟩
theorem add_pos {f g : cau_seq α abs} : pos f → pos g → pos (f + g)
| ⟨F, F0, hF⟩ ⟨G, G0, hG⟩ :=
let ⟨i, h⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and hF hG in
⟨_, _root_.add_pos F0 G0, i,
λ j ij, let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h _ ij in add_le_add h₁ h₂⟩
theorem pos_add_lim_zero {f g : cau_seq α abs} : pos f → lim_zero g → pos (f + g)
| ⟨F, F0, hF⟩ H :=
let ⟨i, h⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and hF (H _ (half_pos F0)) in
⟨_, half_pos F0, i, λ j ij, begin
cases h j ij with h₁ h₂,
have := add_le_add h₁ (le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 h₂).1),
rwa [← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_self_div_two] at this
end⟩
theorem mul_pos {f g : cau_seq α abs} : pos f → pos g → pos (f * g)
| ⟨F, F0, hF⟩ ⟨G, G0, hG⟩ :=
let ⟨i, h⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and hF hG in
⟨_, _root_.mul_pos F0 G0, i,
λ j ij, let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := h _ ij in
mul_le_mul h₁ h₂ (le_of_lt G0) (le_trans (le_of_lt F0) h₁)⟩
theorem trichotomy (f : cau_seq α abs) : pos f ∨ lim_zero f ∨ pos (-f) :=
begin
cases classical.em (lim_zero f); simp *,
rcases abv_pos_of_not_lim_zero h with ⟨K, K0, hK⟩,
rcases exists_forall_ge_and hK (f.cauchy₃ K0) with ⟨i, hi⟩,
refine (le_total 0 (f i)).imp _ _;
refine (λ h, ⟨K, K0, i, λ j ij, _⟩);
have := (hi _ ij).1;
cases hi _ (le_refl _) with h₁ h₂,
{ rwa abs_of_nonneg at this,
rw abs_of_nonneg h at h₁,
exact (le_add_iff_nonneg_right _).1
(le_trans h₁ $ neg_le_sub_iff_le_add'.1 $
le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 $ h₂ _ ij).1) },
{ rwa abs_of_nonpos at this,
rw abs_of_nonpos h at h₁,
rw [← sub_le_sub_iff_right, zero_sub],
exact le_trans (le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 $ h₂ _ ij).2) h₁ }
end
instance : has_lt (cau_seq α abs) := ⟨λ f g, pos (g - f)⟩
instance : has_le (cau_seq α abs) := ⟨λ f g, f < g ∨ f ≈ g⟩
theorem lt_of_lt_of_eq {f g h : cau_seq α abs}
(fg : f < g) (gh : g ≈ h) : f < h :=
by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm] using pos_add_lim_zero fg (neg_lim_zero gh)
theorem lt_of_eq_of_lt {f g h : cau_seq α abs}
(fg : f ≈ g) (gh : g < h) : f < h :=
by have := pos_add_lim_zero gh (neg_lim_zero fg);
rwa [← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right] at this
theorem lt_trans {f g h : cau_seq α abs} (fg : f < g) (gh : g < h) : f < h :=
by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm] using add_pos fg gh
theorem lt_irrefl {f : cau_seq α abs} : ¬ f < f
| h := not_lim_zero_of_pos h (by simp [zero_lim_zero])
lemma le_of_eq_of_le {f g h : cau_seq α abs}
(hfg : f ≈ g) (hgh : g ≤ h) : f ≤ h :=
hgh.elim (or.inl ∘ cau_seq.lt_of_eq_of_lt hfg)
(or.inr ∘ setoid.trans hfg)
lemma le_of_le_of_eq {f g h : cau_seq α abs}
(hfg : f ≤ g) (hgh : g ≈ h) : f ≤ h :=
hfg.elim (λ h, or.inl (cau_seq.lt_of_lt_of_eq h hgh))
(λ h, or.inr (setoid.trans h hgh))
instance : preorder (cau_seq α abs) :=
{ lt := (<),
le := λ f g, f < g ∨ f ≈ g,
le_refl := λ f, or.inr (setoid.refl _),
le_trans := λ f g h fg, match fg with
| or.inl fg, or.inl gh := or.inl $ lt_trans fg gh
| or.inl fg, or.inr gh := or.inl $ lt_of_lt_of_eq fg gh
| or.inr fg, or.inl gh := or.inl $ lt_of_eq_of_lt fg gh
| or.inr fg, or.inr gh := or.inr $ setoid.trans fg gh
end,
lt_iff_le_not_le := λ f g,
⟨λ h, ⟨or.inl h,
not_or (mt (lt_trans h) lt_irrefl) (not_lim_zero_of_pos h)⟩,
λ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₁.resolve_right
(mt (λ h, or.inr (setoid.symm h)) h₂)⟩ }
theorem le_antisymm {f g : cau_seq α abs} (fg : f ≤ g) (gf : g ≤ f) : f ≈ g :=
fg.resolve_left (not_lt_of_le gf)
theorem lt_total (f g : cau_seq α abs) : f < g ∨ f ≈ g ∨ g < f :=
(trichotomy (g - f)).imp_right
(λ h, h.imp (λ h, setoid.symm h) (λ h, by rwa neg_sub at h))
theorem le_total (f g : cau_seq α abs) : f ≤ g ∨ g ≤ f :=
(or.assoc.2 (lt_total f g)).imp_right or.inl
theorem const_lt {x y : α} : const x < const y ↔ x < y :=
show pos _ ↔ _, by rw [← const_sub, const_pos, sub_pos]
theorem const_le {x y : α} : const x ≤ const y ↔ x ≤ y :=
by rw le_iff_lt_or_eq; exact or_congr const_lt const_equiv
lemma le_of_exists {f g : cau_seq α abs}
(h : ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, f j ≤ g j) : f ≤ g :=
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h in
(or.assoc.2 (cau_seq.lt_total f g)).elim
id
(λ hgf, false.elim (let ⟨K, hK0, j, hKj⟩ := hgf in
not_lt_of_ge (hi (max i j) (le_max_left _ _))
(sub_pos.1 (lt_of_lt_of_le hK0 (hKj _ (le_max_right _ _))))))
theorem exists_gt (f : cau_seq α abs) : ∃ a : α, f < const a :=
let ⟨K, H⟩ := f.bounded in
⟨K + 1, 1, zero_lt_one, 0, λ i _, begin
rw [sub_apply, const_apply, le_sub_iff_add_le', add_le_add_iff_right],
exact le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 (H _)).2
end⟩
theorem exists_lt (f : cau_seq α abs) : ∃ a : α, const a < f :=
let ⟨a, h⟩ := (-f).exists_gt in ⟨-a, show pos _,
by rwa [const_neg, sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm, ← sub_neg_eq_add]⟩
end abs
end cau_seq
|
2a16ae831b5afaf0cd9a4c8ca6823493ee679445 | c09f5945267fd905e23a77be83d9a78580e04a4a | /src/topology/basic.lean | aac6607b9bfc99626a4056e6e7c6731d817e3a5e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | OHIHIYA20/mathlib | 023a6df35355b5b6eb931c404f7dd7535dccfa89 | 1ec0a1f49db97d45e8666a3bf33217ff79ca1d87 | refs/heads/master | 1,587,964,529,965 | 1,551,819,319,000 | 1,551,819,319,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 34,552 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
Theory of topological spaces.
Parts of the formalization is based on the books:
N. Bourbaki: General Topology
I. M. James: Topologies and Uniformities
A major difference is that this formalization is heavily based on the filter library.
-/
import order.filter data.set.countable tactic
open set filter lattice classical
local attribute [instance] prop_decidable
universes u v w
structure topological_space (α : Type u) :=
(is_open : set α → Prop)
(is_open_univ : is_open univ)
(is_open_inter : ∀s t, is_open s → is_open t → is_open (s ∩ t))
(is_open_sUnion : ∀s, (∀t∈s, is_open t) → is_open (⋃₀ s))
attribute [class] topological_space
section topological_space
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {a : α} {s s₁ s₂ : set α} {p p₁ p₂ : α → Prop}
@[extensionality]
lemma topological_space_eq : ∀ {f g : topological_space α}, f.is_open = g.is_open → f = g
| ⟨a, _, _, _⟩ ⟨b, _, _, _⟩ rfl := rfl
section
variables [t : topological_space α]
include t
/-- `is_open s` means that `s` is open in the ambient topological space on `α` -/
def is_open (s : set α) : Prop := topological_space.is_open t s
@[simp]
lemma is_open_univ : is_open (univ : set α) := topological_space.is_open_univ t
lemma is_open_inter (h₁ : is_open s₁) (h₂ : is_open s₂) : is_open (s₁ ∩ s₂) :=
topological_space.is_open_inter t s₁ s₂ h₁ h₂
lemma is_open_sUnion {s : set (set α)} (h : ∀t ∈ s, is_open t) : is_open (⋃₀ s) :=
topological_space.is_open_sUnion t s h
end
lemma is_open_fold {s : set α} {t : topological_space α} : t.is_open s = @is_open α t s :=
rfl
variables [topological_space α]
lemma is_open_Union {f : ι → set α} (h : ∀i, is_open (f i)) : is_open (⋃i, f i) :=
is_open_sUnion $ by rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩; exact h i
lemma is_open_bUnion {s : set β} {f : β → set α} (h : ∀i∈s, is_open (f i)) :
is_open (⋃i∈s, f i) :=
is_open_Union $ assume i, is_open_Union $ assume hi, h i hi
lemma is_open_union (h₁ : is_open s₁) (h₂ : is_open s₂) : is_open (s₁ ∪ s₂) :=
by rw union_eq_Union; exact is_open_Union (bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩)
@[simp] lemma is_open_empty : is_open (∅ : set α) :=
by rw ← sUnion_empty; exact is_open_sUnion (assume a, false.elim)
lemma is_open_sInter {s : set (set α)} (hs : finite s) : (∀t ∈ s, is_open t) → is_open (⋂₀ s) :=
finite.induction_on hs (λ _, by rw sInter_empty; exact is_open_univ) $
λ a s has hs ih h, by rw sInter_insert; exact
is_open_inter (h _ $ mem_insert _ _) (ih $ λ t, h t ∘ mem_insert_of_mem _)
lemma is_open_bInter {s : set β} {f : β → set α} (hs : finite s) :
(∀i∈s, is_open (f i)) → is_open (⋂i∈s, f i) :=
finite.induction_on hs
(λ _, by rw bInter_empty; exact is_open_univ)
(λ a s has hs ih h, by rw bInter_insert; exact
is_open_inter (h a (mem_insert _ _)) (ih (λ i hi, h i (mem_insert_of_mem _ hi))))
lemma is_open_const {p : Prop} : is_open {a : α | p} :=
by_cases
(assume : p, begin simp only [this]; exact is_open_univ end)
(assume : ¬ p, begin simp only [this]; exact is_open_empty end)
lemma is_open_and : is_open {a | p₁ a} → is_open {a | p₂ a} → is_open {a | p₁ a ∧ p₂ a} :=
is_open_inter
/-- A set is closed if its complement is open -/
def is_closed (s : set α) : Prop := is_open (-s)
@[simp] lemma is_closed_empty : is_closed (∅ : set α) :=
by unfold is_closed; rw compl_empty; exact is_open_univ
@[simp] lemma is_closed_univ : is_closed (univ : set α) :=
by unfold is_closed; rw compl_univ; exact is_open_empty
lemma is_closed_union : is_closed s₁ → is_closed s₂ → is_closed (s₁ ∪ s₂) :=
λ h₁ h₂, by unfold is_closed; rw compl_union; exact is_open_inter h₁ h₂
lemma is_closed_sInter {s : set (set α)} : (∀t ∈ s, is_closed t) → is_closed (⋂₀ s) :=
by simp only [is_closed, compl_sInter, sUnion_image]; exact assume h, is_open_Union $ assume t, is_open_Union $ assume ht, h t ht
lemma is_closed_Inter {f : ι → set α} (h : ∀i, is_closed (f i)) : is_closed (⋂i, f i ) :=
is_closed_sInter $ assume t ⟨i, (heq : f i = t)⟩, heq ▸ h i
@[simp] lemma is_open_compl_iff {s : set α} : is_open (-s) ↔ is_closed s := iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma is_closed_compl_iff {s : set α} : is_closed (-s) ↔ is_open s :=
by rw [←is_open_compl_iff, compl_compl]
lemma is_open_diff {s t : set α} (h₁ : is_open s) (h₂ : is_closed t) : is_open (s \ t) :=
is_open_inter h₁ $ is_open_compl_iff.mpr h₂
lemma is_closed_inter (h₁ : is_closed s₁) (h₂ : is_closed s₂) : is_closed (s₁ ∩ s₂) :=
by rw [is_closed, compl_inter]; exact is_open_union h₁ h₂
lemma is_closed_Union {s : set β} {f : β → set α} (hs : finite s) :
(∀i∈s, is_closed (f i)) → is_closed (⋃i∈s, f i) :=
finite.induction_on hs
(λ _, by rw bUnion_empty; exact is_closed_empty)
(λ a s has hs ih h, by rw bUnion_insert; exact
is_closed_union (h a (mem_insert _ _)) (ih (λ i hi, h i (mem_insert_of_mem _ hi))))
lemma is_closed_imp {p q : α → Prop} (hp : is_open {x | p x})
(hq : is_closed {x | q x}) : is_closed {x | p x → q x} :=
have {x | p x → q x} = (- {x | p x}) ∪ {x | q x}, from set.ext $ λ x, imp_iff_not_or,
by rw [this]; exact is_closed_union (is_closed_compl_iff.mpr hp) hq
lemma is_open_neg : is_closed {a | p a} → is_open {a | ¬ p a} :=
is_open_compl_iff.mpr
/-- The interior of a set `s` is the largest open subset of `s`. -/
def interior (s : set α) : set α := ⋃₀ {t | is_open t ∧ t ⊆ s}
lemma mem_interior {s : set α} {x : α} :
x ∈ interior s ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, is_open t ∧ x ∈ t :=
by simp only [interior, mem_set_of_eq, exists_prop, and_assoc, and.left_comm]
@[simp] lemma is_open_interior {s : set α} : is_open (interior s) :=
is_open_sUnion $ assume t ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₁
lemma interior_subset {s : set α} : interior s ⊆ s :=
sUnion_subset $ assume t ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₂
lemma interior_maximal {s t : set α} (h₁ : t ⊆ s) (h₂ : is_open t) : t ⊆ interior s :=
subset_sUnion_of_mem ⟨h₂, h₁⟩
lemma interior_eq_of_open {s : set α} (h : is_open s) : interior s = s :=
subset.antisymm interior_subset (interior_maximal (subset.refl s) h)
lemma interior_eq_iff_open {s : set α} : interior s = s ↔ is_open s :=
⟨assume h, h ▸ is_open_interior, interior_eq_of_open⟩
lemma subset_interior_iff_open {s : set α} : s ⊆ interior s ↔ is_open s :=
by simp only [interior_eq_iff_open.symm, subset.antisymm_iff, interior_subset, true_and]
lemma subset_interior_iff_subset_of_open {s t : set α} (h₁ : is_open s) :
s ⊆ interior t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨assume h, subset.trans h interior_subset, assume h₂, interior_maximal h₂ h₁⟩
lemma interior_mono {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : interior s ⊆ interior t :=
interior_maximal (subset.trans interior_subset h) is_open_interior
@[simp] lemma interior_empty : interior (∅ : set α) = ∅ :=
interior_eq_of_open is_open_empty
@[simp] lemma interior_univ : interior (univ : set α) = univ :=
interior_eq_of_open is_open_univ
@[simp] lemma interior_interior {s : set α} : interior (interior s) = interior s :=
interior_eq_of_open is_open_interior
@[simp] lemma interior_inter {s t : set α} : interior (s ∩ t) = interior s ∩ interior t :=
subset.antisymm
(subset_inter (interior_mono $ inter_subset_left s t) (interior_mono $ inter_subset_right s t))
(interior_maximal (inter_subset_inter interior_subset interior_subset) $ is_open_inter is_open_interior is_open_interior)
lemma interior_union_is_closed_of_interior_empty {s t : set α} (h₁ : is_closed s) (h₂ : interior t = ∅) :
interior (s ∪ t) = interior s :=
have interior (s ∪ t) ⊆ s, from
assume x ⟨u, ⟨(hu₁ : is_open u), (hu₂ : u ⊆ s ∪ t)⟩, (hx₁ : x ∈ u)⟩,
classical.by_contradiction $ assume hx₂ : x ∉ s,
have u \ s ⊆ t,
from assume x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, or.resolve_left (hu₂ h₁) h₂,
have u \ s ⊆ interior t,
by rwa subset_interior_iff_subset_of_open (is_open_diff hu₁ h₁),
have u \ s ⊆ ∅,
by rwa h₂ at this,
this ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩,
subset.antisymm
(interior_maximal this is_open_interior)
(interior_mono $ subset_union_left _ _)
lemma is_open_iff_forall_mem_open : is_open s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ⊆ s, is_open t ∧ x ∈ t :=
by rw ← subset_interior_iff_open; simp only [subset_def, mem_interior]
/-- The closure of `s` is the smallest closed set containing `s`. -/
def closure (s : set α) : set α := ⋂₀ {t | is_closed t ∧ s ⊆ t}
@[simp] lemma is_closed_closure {s : set α} : is_closed (closure s) :=
is_closed_sInter $ assume t ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₁
lemma subset_closure {s : set α} : s ⊆ closure s :=
subset_sInter $ assume t ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, h₂
lemma closure_minimal {s t : set α} (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : is_closed t) : closure s ⊆ t :=
sInter_subset_of_mem ⟨h₂, h₁⟩
lemma closure_eq_of_is_closed {s : set α} (h : is_closed s) : closure s = s :=
subset.antisymm (closure_minimal (subset.refl s) h) subset_closure
lemma closure_eq_iff_is_closed {s : set α} : closure s = s ↔ is_closed s :=
⟨assume h, h ▸ is_closed_closure, closure_eq_of_is_closed⟩
lemma closure_subset_iff_subset_of_is_closed {s t : set α} (h₁ : is_closed t) :
closure s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨subset.trans subset_closure, assume h, closure_minimal h h₁⟩
lemma closure_mono {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : closure s ⊆ closure t :=
closure_minimal (subset.trans h subset_closure) is_closed_closure
lemma is_closed_of_closure_subset {s : set α} (h : closure s ⊆ s) : is_closed s :=
by rw subset.antisymm subset_closure h; exact is_closed_closure
@[simp] lemma closure_empty : closure (∅ : set α) = ∅ :=
closure_eq_of_is_closed is_closed_empty
lemma closure_empty_iff (s : set α) : closure s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
begin
split; intro h,
{ rw set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem,
intros x H,
simpa only [h] using subset_closure H },
{ exact (eq.symm h) ▸ closure_empty },
end
@[simp] lemma closure_univ : closure (univ : set α) = univ :=
closure_eq_of_is_closed is_closed_univ
@[simp] lemma closure_closure {s : set α} : closure (closure s) = closure s :=
closure_eq_of_is_closed is_closed_closure
@[simp] lemma closure_union {s t : set α} : closure (s ∪ t) = closure s ∪ closure t :=
subset.antisymm
(closure_minimal (union_subset_union subset_closure subset_closure) $ is_closed_union is_closed_closure is_closed_closure)
(union_subset (closure_mono $ subset_union_left _ _) (closure_mono $ subset_union_right _ _))
lemma interior_subset_closure {s : set α} : interior s ⊆ closure s :=
subset.trans interior_subset subset_closure
lemma closure_eq_compl_interior_compl {s : set α} : closure s = - interior (- s) :=
begin
unfold interior closure is_closed,
rw [compl_sUnion, compl_image_set_of],
simp only [compl_subset_compl]
end
@[simp] lemma interior_compl {s : set α} : interior (- s) = - closure s :=
by simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl]
@[simp] lemma closure_compl {s : set α} : closure (- s) = - interior s :=
by simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl]
theorem mem_closure_iff {s : set α} {a : α} : a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ o, is_open o → a ∈ o → o ∩ s ≠ ∅ :=
⟨λ h o oo ao os,
have s ⊆ -o, from λ x xs xo, @ne_empty_of_mem α (o∩s) x ⟨xo, xs⟩ os,
closure_minimal this (is_closed_compl_iff.2 oo) h ao,
λ H c ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, classical.by_contradiction $ λ nc,
let ⟨x, hc, hs⟩ := exists_mem_of_ne_empty (H _ h₁ nc) in hc (h₂ hs)⟩
lemma dense_iff_inter_open {s : set α} : closure s = univ ↔ ∀ U, is_open U → U ≠ ∅ → U ∩ s ≠ ∅ :=
begin
split ; intro h,
{ intros U U_op U_ne,
cases exists_mem_of_ne_empty U_ne with x x_in,
exact mem_closure_iff.1 (by simp only [h]) U U_op x_in },
{ apply eq_univ_of_forall, intro x,
rw mem_closure_iff,
intros U U_op x_in,
exact h U U_op (ne_empty_of_mem x_in) },
end
/-- The frontier of a set is the set of points between the closure and interior. -/
def frontier (s : set α) : set α := closure s \ interior s
lemma frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure {s : set α} :
frontier s = closure s ∩ closure (- s) :=
by rw [closure_compl, frontier, diff_eq]
@[simp] lemma frontier_compl (s : set α) : frontier (-s) = frontier s :=
by simp only [frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure, lattice.neg_neg, inter_comm]
/-- neighbourhood filter -/
def nhds (a : α) : filter α := (⨅ s ∈ {s : set α | a ∈ s ∧ is_open s}, principal s)
lemma nhds_sets {a : α} : (nhds a).sets = {s | ∃t⊆s, is_open t ∧ a ∈ t} :=
calc (nhds a).sets = (⋃s∈{s : set α| a ∈ s ∧ is_open s}, (principal s).sets) : infi_sets_eq'
(assume x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ y ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩,
⟨x ∩ y, ⟨⟨hx₁, hy₁⟩, is_open_inter hx₂ hy₂⟩,
le_principal_iff.2 (inter_subset_left _ _),
le_principal_iff.2 (inter_subset_right _ _)⟩)
⟨univ, mem_univ _, is_open_univ⟩
... = {s | ∃t⊆s, is_open t ∧ a ∈ t} :
le_antisymm
(supr_le $ assume i, supr_le $ assume ⟨hi₁, hi₂⟩ t ht, ⟨i, ht, hi₂, hi₁⟩)
(assume t ⟨i, hi₁, hi₂, hi₃⟩, mem_Union.2 ⟨i, mem_Union.2 ⟨⟨hi₃, hi₂⟩, hi₁⟩⟩)
lemma map_nhds {a : α} {f : α → β} :
map f (nhds a) = (⨅ s ∈ {s : set α | a ∈ s ∧ is_open s}, principal (image f s)) :=
calc map f (nhds a) = (⨅ s ∈ {s : set α | a ∈ s ∧ is_open s}, map f (principal s)) :
map_binfi_eq
(assume x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ y ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩,
⟨x ∩ y, ⟨⟨hx₁, hy₁⟩, is_open_inter hx₂ hy₂⟩,
le_principal_iff.2 (inter_subset_left _ _),
le_principal_iff.2 (inter_subset_right _ _)⟩)
⟨univ, mem_univ _, is_open_univ⟩
... = _ : by simp only [map_principal]
lemma mem_nhds_sets_iff {a : α} {s : set α} :
s ∈ (nhds a).sets ↔ ∃t⊆s, is_open t ∧ a ∈ t :=
by simp only [nhds_sets, mem_set_of_eq, exists_prop]
lemma mem_of_nhds {a : α} {s : set α} : s ∈ (nhds a).sets → a ∈ s :=
λ H, let ⟨t, ht, _, hs⟩ := mem_nhds_sets_iff.1 H in ht hs
lemma mem_nhds_sets {a : α} {s : set α} (hs : is_open s) (ha : a ∈ s) :
s ∈ (nhds a).sets :=
mem_nhds_sets_iff.2 ⟨s, subset.refl _, hs, ha⟩
theorem all_mem_nhds (x : α) (P : set α → Prop) (hP : ∀ s t, s ⊆ t → P s → P t) :
(∀ s ∈ (nhds x).sets, P s) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → x ∈ s → P s) :=
iff.intro
(λ h s os xs, h s (mem_nhds_sets os xs))
(λ h t,
begin
rw nhds_sets,
rintros ⟨s, hs, opens, xs⟩,
exact hP _ _ hs (h s opens xs),
end)
theorem all_mem_nhds_filter (x : α) (f : set α → set β) (hf : ∀ s t, s ⊆ t → f s ⊆ f t)
(l : filter β) :
(∀ s ∈ (nhds x).sets, f s ∈ l.sets) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → x ∈ s → f s ∈ l.sets) :=
all_mem_nhds _ _ (λ s t ssubt h, mem_sets_of_superset h (hf s t ssubt))
theorem rtendsto_nhds {r : rel β α} {l : filter β} {a : α} :
rtendsto r l (nhds a) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → a ∈ s → r.core s ∈ l.sets) :=
all_mem_nhds_filter _ _ (λ s t h, h) _
theorem rtendsto'_nhds {r : rel β α} {l : filter β} {a : α} :
rtendsto' r l (nhds a) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → a ∈ s → r.preimage s ∈ l.sets) :=
by { rw [rtendsto'_def], apply all_mem_nhds_filter, apply rel.preimage_mono }
theorem ptendsto_nhds {f : β →. α} {l : filter β} {a : α} :
ptendsto f l (nhds a) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → a ∈ s → f.core s ∈ l.sets) :=
rtendsto_nhds
theorem ptendsto'_nhds {f : β →. α} {l : filter β} {a : α} :
ptendsto' f l (nhds a) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → a ∈ s → f.preimage s ∈ l.sets) :=
rtendsto'_nhds
theorem tendsto_nhds {f : β → α} {l : filter β} {a : α} :
tendsto f l (nhds a) ↔ (∀ s, is_open s → a ∈ s → f ⁻¹' s ∈ l.sets) :=
all_mem_nhds_filter _ _ (λ s t h, h) _
lemma tendsto_const_nhds {a : α} {f : filter β} : tendsto (λb:β, a) f (nhds a) :=
tendsto_nhds.mpr $ assume s hs ha, univ_mem_sets' $ assume _, ha
lemma pure_le_nhds : pure ≤ (nhds : α → filter α) :=
assume a, le_infi $ assume s, le_infi $ assume ⟨h₁, _⟩, principal_mono.mpr $
singleton_subset_iff.2 h₁
lemma tendsto_pure_nhds [topological_space β] (f : α → β) (a : α) :
tendsto f (pure a) (nhds (f a)) :=
begin
rw [tendsto, filter.map_pure],
exact pure_le_nhds (f a)
end
@[simp] lemma nhds_neq_bot {a : α} : nhds a ≠ ⊥ :=
assume : nhds a = ⊥,
have pure a = (⊥ : filter α),
from lattice.bot_unique $ this ▸ pure_le_nhds a,
pure_neq_bot this
lemma interior_eq_nhds {s : set α} : interior s = {a | nhds a ≤ principal s} :=
set.ext $ λ x, by simp only [mem_interior, le_principal_iff, mem_nhds_sets_iff]; refl
lemma mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds {s : set α} {a : α} :
a ∈ interior s ↔ s ∈ (nhds a).sets :=
by simp only [interior_eq_nhds, le_principal_iff]; refl
lemma is_open_iff_nhds {s : set α} : is_open s ↔ ∀a∈s, nhds a ≤ principal s :=
calc is_open s ↔ s ⊆ interior s : subset_interior_iff_open.symm
... ↔ (∀a∈s, nhds a ≤ principal s) : by rw [interior_eq_nhds]; refl
lemma is_open_iff_mem_nhds {s : set α} : is_open s ↔ ∀a∈s, s ∈ (nhds a).sets :=
is_open_iff_nhds.trans $ forall_congr $ λ _, imp_congr_right $ λ _, le_principal_iff
lemma closure_eq_nhds {s : set α} : closure s = {a | nhds a ⊓ principal s ≠ ⊥} :=
calc closure s = - interior (- s) : closure_eq_compl_interior_compl
... = {a | ¬ nhds a ≤ principal (-s)} : by rw [interior_eq_nhds]; refl
... = {a | nhds a ⊓ principal s ≠ ⊥} : set.ext $ assume a, not_congr
(inf_eq_bot_iff_le_compl
(show principal s ⊔ principal (-s) = ⊤, by simp only [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ])
(by simp only [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty])).symm
theorem mem_closure_iff_nhds {s : set α} {a : α} : a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ t ∈ (nhds a).sets, t ∩ s ≠ ∅ :=
mem_closure_iff.trans
⟨λ H t ht, subset_ne_empty
(inter_subset_inter_left _ interior_subset)
(H _ is_open_interior (mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 ht)),
λ H o oo ao, H _ (mem_nhds_sets oo ao)⟩
/-- `x` belongs to the closure of `s` if and only if some ultrafilter
supported on `s` converges to `x`. -/
lemma mem_closure_iff_ultrafilter {s : set α} {x : α} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∃ (u : ultrafilter α), s ∈ u.val.sets ∧ u.val ≤ nhds x :=
begin
rw closure_eq_nhds, change nhds x ⊓ principal s ≠ ⊥ ↔ _, symmetry,
convert exists_ultrafilter_iff _, ext u,
rw [←le_principal_iff, inf_comm, le_inf_iff]
end
lemma is_closed_iff_nhds {s : set α} : is_closed s ↔ ∀a, nhds a ⊓ principal s ≠ ⊥ → a ∈ s :=
calc is_closed s ↔ closure s = s : by rw [closure_eq_iff_is_closed]
... ↔ closure s ⊆ s : ⟨assume h, by rw h, assume h, subset.antisymm h subset_closure⟩
... ↔ (∀a, nhds a ⊓ principal s ≠ ⊥ → a ∈ s) : by rw [closure_eq_nhds]; refl
lemma closure_inter_open {s t : set α} (h : is_open s) : s ∩ closure t ⊆ closure (s ∩ t) :=
assume a ⟨hs, ht⟩,
have s ∈ (nhds a).sets, from mem_nhds_sets h hs,
have nhds a ⊓ principal s = nhds a, from inf_of_le_left $ by rwa le_principal_iff,
have nhds a ⊓ principal (s ∩ t) ≠ ⊥,
from calc nhds a ⊓ principal (s ∩ t) = nhds a ⊓ (principal s ⊓ principal t) : by rw inf_principal
... = nhds a ⊓ principal t : by rw [←inf_assoc, this]
... ≠ ⊥ : by rw [closure_eq_nhds] at ht; assumption,
by rw [closure_eq_nhds]; assumption
lemma closure_diff {s t : set α} : closure s - closure t ⊆ closure (s - t) :=
calc closure s \ closure t = (- closure t) ∩ closure s : by simp only [diff_eq, inter_comm]
... ⊆ closure (- closure t ∩ s) : closure_inter_open $ is_open_compl_iff.mpr $ is_closed_closure
... = closure (s \ closure t) : by simp only [diff_eq, inter_comm]
... ⊆ closure (s \ t) : closure_mono $ diff_subset_diff (subset.refl s) subset_closure
lemma mem_of_closed_of_tendsto {f : β → α} {b : filter β} {a : α} {s : set α}
(hb : b ≠ ⊥) (hf : tendsto f b (nhds a)) (hs : is_closed s) (h : f ⁻¹' s ∈ b.sets) : a ∈ s :=
have b.map f ≤ nhds a ⊓ principal s,
from le_trans (le_inf (le_refl _) (le_principal_iff.mpr h)) (inf_le_inf hf (le_refl _)),
is_closed_iff_nhds.mp hs a $ neq_bot_of_le_neq_bot (map_ne_bot hb) this
lemma mem_of_closed_of_tendsto' {f : β → α} {x : filter β} {a : α} {s : set α}
(hf : tendsto f x (nhds a)) (hs : is_closed s) (h : x ⊓ principal (f ⁻¹' s) ≠ ⊥) : a ∈ s :=
is_closed_iff_nhds.mp hs _ $ neq_bot_of_le_neq_bot (@map_ne_bot _ _ _ f h) $
le_inf (le_trans (map_mono $ inf_le_left) hf) $
le_trans (map_mono $ inf_le_right_of_le $ by simp only [comap_principal, le_principal_iff]; exact subset.refl _) (@map_comap_le _ _ _ f)
lemma mem_closure_of_tendsto {f : β → α} {b : filter β} {a : α} {s : set α}
(hb : b ≠ ⊥) (hf : tendsto f b (nhds a)) (h : f ⁻¹' s ∈ b.sets) : a ∈ closure s :=
mem_of_closed_of_tendsto hb hf (is_closed_closure) $
filter.mem_sets_of_superset h (preimage_mono subset_closure)
section lim
variables [inhabited α]
/-- If `f` is a filter, then `lim f` is a limit of the filter, if it exists. -/
noncomputable def lim (f : filter α) : α := epsilon $ λa, f ≤ nhds a
lemma lim_spec {f : filter α} (h : ∃a, f ≤ nhds a) : f ≤ nhds (lim f) := epsilon_spec h
end lim
/-
The nhds_within filter.
-/
def nhds_within (a : α) (s : set α) : filter α := nhds a ⊓ principal s
theorem nhds_within_eq (a : α) (s : set α) :
nhds_within a s = ⨅ t ∈ {t : set α | a ∈ t ∧ is_open t}, principal (t ∩ s) :=
have set.univ ∈ {s : set α | a ∈ s ∧ is_open s}, from ⟨set.mem_univ _, is_open_univ⟩,
begin
rw [nhds_within, nhds, lattice.binfi_inf]; try { exact this },
simp only [inf_principal]
end
theorem nhds_within_univ (a : α) : nhds_within a set.univ = nhds a :=
by rw [nhds_within, principal_univ, lattice.inf_top_eq]
theorem mem_nhds_within (t : set α) (a : α) (s : set α) :
t ∈ (nhds_within a s).sets ↔ ∃ u, is_open u ∧ a ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ t :=
begin
rw [nhds_within, mem_inf_principal, mem_nhds_sets_iff], split,
{ rintros ⟨u, hu, openu, au⟩,
exact ⟨u, openu, au, λ x ⟨xu, xs⟩, hu xu xs⟩ },
rintros ⟨u, openu, au, hu⟩,
exact ⟨u, λ x xu xs, hu ⟨xu, xs⟩, openu, au⟩
end
theorem nhds_within_mono (a : α) {s t : set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : nhds_within a s ≤ nhds_within a t :=
lattice.inf_le_inf (le_refl _) (principal_mono.mpr h)
theorem nhds_within_restrict {a : α} (s : set α) {t : set α} (h₀ : a ∈ t) (h₁ : is_open t) :
nhds_within a s = nhds_within a (s ∩ t) :=
have s ∩ t ∈ (nhds_within a s).sets,
from inter_mem_sets (mem_inf_sets_of_right (mem_principal_self s))
(mem_inf_sets_of_left (mem_nhds_sets h₁ h₀)),
le_antisymm
(lattice.le_inf lattice.inf_le_left (le_principal_iff.mpr this))
(lattice.inf_le_inf (le_refl _) (principal_mono.mpr (set.inter_subset_left _ _)))
theorem nhds_within_eq_nhds_within {a : α} {s t u : set α}
(h₀ : a ∈ s) (h₁ : is_open s) (h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) :
nhds_within a t = nhds_within a u :=
by rw [nhds_within_restrict t h₀ h₁, nhds_within_restrict u h₀ h₁, h₂]
theorem nhs_within_eq_of_open {a : α} {s : set α} (h₀ : a ∈ s) (h₁ : is_open s) :
nhds_within a s = nhds a :=
by rw [←nhds_within_univ]; apply nhds_within_eq_nhds_within h₀ h₁;
rw [set.univ_inter, set.inter_self]
@[simp] theorem nhds_within_empty (a : α) : nhds_within a {} = ⊥ :=
by rw [nhds_within, principal_empty, lattice.inf_bot_eq]
theorem nhds_within_union (a : α) (s t : set α) :
nhds_within a (s ∪ t) = nhds_within a s ⊔ nhds_within a t :=
by unfold nhds_within; rw [←lattice.inf_sup_left, sup_principal]
theorem nhds_within_inter (a : α) (s t : set α) :
nhds_within a (s ∩ t) = nhds_within a s ⊓ nhds_within a t :=
by unfold nhds_within; rw [lattice.inf_left_comm, lattice.inf_assoc, inf_principal,
←lattice.inf_assoc, lattice.inf_idem]
theorem nhds_within_inter' (a : α) (s t : set α) :
nhds_within a (s ∩ t) = (nhds_within a s) ⊓ principal t :=
by { unfold nhds_within, rw [←inf_principal, lattice.inf_assoc] }
theorem tendsto_if_nhds_within {f g : α → β} {p : α → Prop} [decidable_pred p]
{a : α} {s : set α} {l : filter β}
(h₀ : tendsto f (nhds_within a (s ∩ p)) l)
(h₁ : tendsto g (nhds_within a (s ∩ {x | ¬ p x})) l) :
tendsto (λ x, if p x then f x else g x) (nhds_within a s) l :=
by apply tendsto_if; rw [←nhds_within_inter']; assumption
lemma map_nhds_within (f : α → β) (a : α) (s : set α) :
map f (nhds_within a s) =
⨅ t ∈ {t : set α | a ∈ t ∧ is_open t}, principal (set.image f (t ∩ s)) :=
have h₀ : directed_on ((λ (i : set α), principal (i ∩ s)) ⁻¹'o ge)
{x : set α | x ∈ {t : set α | a ∈ t ∧ is_open t}}, from
assume x ⟨ax, openx⟩ y ⟨ay, openy⟩,
⟨x ∩ y, ⟨⟨ax, ay⟩, is_open_inter openx openy⟩,
le_principal_iff.mpr (set.inter_subset_inter_left _ (set.inter_subset_left _ _)),
le_principal_iff.mpr (set.inter_subset_inter_left _ (set.inter_subset_right _ _))⟩,
have h₁ : ∃ (i : set α), i ∈ {t : set α | a ∈ t ∧ is_open t},
from ⟨set.univ, set.mem_univ _, is_open_univ⟩,
by { rw [nhds_within_eq, map_binfi_eq h₀ h₁], simp only [map_principal] }
theorem tendsto_nhds_within_mono_left {f : α → β} {a : α}
{s t : set α} {l : filter β} (hst : s ⊆ t) (h : tendsto f (nhds_within a t) l) :
tendsto f (nhds_within a s) l :=
tendsto_le_left (nhds_within_mono a hst) h
theorem tendsto_nhds_within_mono_right {f : β → α} {l : filter β}
{a : α} {s t : set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (h : tendsto f l (nhds_within a s)) :
tendsto f l (nhds_within a t) :=
tendsto_le_right (nhds_within_mono a hst) h
theorem tendsto_nhds_within_of_tendsto_nhds {f : α → β} {a : α}
{s : set α} {l : filter β} (h : tendsto f (nhds a) l) :
tendsto f (nhds_within a s) l :=
by rw [←nhds_within_univ] at h; exact tendsto_nhds_within_mono_left (set.subset_univ _) h
/- locally finite family [General Topology (Bourbaki, 1995)] -/
section locally_finite
/-- A family of sets in `set α` is locally finite if at every point `x:α`,
there is a neighborhood of `x` which meets only finitely many sets in the family -/
def locally_finite (f : β → set α) :=
∀x:α, ∃t∈(nhds x).sets, finite {i | f i ∩ t ≠ ∅ }
lemma locally_finite_of_finite {f : β → set α} (h : finite (univ : set β)) : locally_finite f :=
assume x, ⟨univ, univ_mem_sets, finite_subset h $ subset_univ _⟩
lemma locally_finite_subset
{f₁ f₂ : β → set α} (hf₂ : locally_finite f₂) (hf : ∀b, f₁ b ⊆ f₂ b) : locally_finite f₁ :=
assume a,
let ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := hf₂ a in
⟨t, ht₁, finite_subset ht₂ $ assume i hi,
neq_bot_of_le_neq_bot hi $ inter_subset_inter (hf i) $ subset.refl _⟩
lemma is_closed_Union_of_locally_finite {f : β → set α}
(h₁ : locally_finite f) (h₂ : ∀i, is_closed (f i)) : is_closed (⋃i, f i) :=
is_open_iff_nhds.mpr $ assume a, assume h : a ∉ (⋃i, f i),
have ∀i, a ∈ -f i,
from assume i hi, h $ mem_Union.2 ⟨i, hi⟩,
have ∀i, - f i ∈ (nhds a).sets,
by rw [nhds_sets]; exact assume i, ⟨- f i, subset.refl _, h₂ i, this i⟩,
let ⟨t, h_sets, (h_fin : finite {i | f i ∩ t ≠ ∅ })⟩ := h₁ a in
calc nhds a ≤ principal (t ∩ (⋂ i∈{i | f i ∩ t ≠ ∅ }, - f i)) :
begin
rw [le_principal_iff],
apply @filter.inter_mem_sets _ (nhds a) _ _ h_sets,
apply @filter.Inter_mem_sets _ (nhds a) _ _ _ h_fin,
exact assume i h, this i
end
... ≤ principal (- ⋃i, f i) :
begin
simp only [principal_mono, subset_def, mem_compl_eq, mem_inter_eq,
mem_Inter, mem_set_of_eq, mem_Union, and_imp, not_exists,
not_eq_empty_iff_exists, exists_imp_distrib, (≠)],
exact assume x xt ht i xfi, ht i x xfi xt xfi
end
end locally_finite
end topological_space
section continuous
variables {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
variables [topological_space α] [topological_space β] [topological_space γ]
/-- A function between topological spaces is continuous if the preimage
of every open set is open. -/
def continuous (f : α → β) := ∀s, is_open s → is_open (f ⁻¹' s)
def continuous_at (f : α → β) (x : α) := tendsto f (nhds x) (nhds (f x))
def continuous_at_within (f : α → β) (x : α) (s : set α) : Prop :=
tendsto f (nhds_within x s) (nhds (f x))
def continuous_on (f : α → β) (s : set α) : Prop := ∀ x ∈ s, continuous_at_within f x s
lemma continuous_id : continuous (id : α → α) :=
assume s h, h
lemma continuous.comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g):
continuous (g ∘ f) :=
assume s h, hf _ (hg s h)
lemma continuous.tendsto {f : α → β} (hf : continuous f) (x) :
tendsto f (nhds x) (nhds (f x)) | s :=
show s ∈ (nhds (f x)).sets → s ∈ (map f (nhds x)).sets,
by simp [nhds_sets]; exact
assume t t_subset t_open fx_in_t,
⟨f ⁻¹' t, preimage_mono t_subset, hf t t_open, fx_in_t⟩
lemma continuous_iff_continuous_at {f : α → β} : continuous f ↔ ∀ x, continuous_at f x :=
⟨continuous.tendsto,
assume hf : ∀x, tendsto f (nhds x) (nhds (f x)),
assume s, assume hs : is_open s,
have ∀a, f a ∈ s → s ∈ (nhds (f a)).sets,
by simp [nhds_sets]; exact assume a ha, ⟨s, subset.refl s, hs, ha⟩,
show is_open (f ⁻¹' s),
by simp [is_open_iff_nhds]; exact assume a ha, hf a (this a ha)⟩
lemma continuous_const {b : β} : continuous (λa:α, b) :=
continuous_iff_continuous_at.mpr $ assume a, tendsto_const_nhds
lemma continuous_iff_is_closed {f : α → β} :
continuous f ↔ (∀s, is_closed s → is_closed (f ⁻¹' s)) :=
⟨assume hf s hs, hf (-s) hs,
assume hf s, by rw [←is_closed_compl_iff, ←is_closed_compl_iff]; exact hf _⟩
lemma continuous_at_iff_ultrafilter {f : α → β} (x) : continuous_at f x ↔
∀ g, is_ultrafilter g → g ≤ nhds x → g.map f ≤ nhds (f x) :=
tendsto_iff_ultrafilter f (nhds x) (nhds (f x))
lemma continuous_iff_ultrafilter {f : α → β} :
continuous f ↔ ∀ x g, is_ultrafilter g → g ≤ nhds x → g.map f ≤ nhds (f x) :=
by simp only [continuous_iff_continuous_at, continuous_at_iff_ultrafilter]
lemma continuous_if {p : α → Prop} {f g : α → β} {h : ∀a, decidable (p a)}
(hp : ∀a∈frontier {a | p a}, f a = g a) (hf : continuous f) (hg : continuous g) :
continuous (λa, @ite (p a) (h a) β (f a) (g a)) :=
continuous_iff_is_closed.mpr $
assume s hs,
have (λa, ite (p a) (f a) (g a)) ⁻¹' s =
(closure {a | p a} ∩ f ⁻¹' s) ∪ (closure {a | ¬ p a} ∩ g ⁻¹' s),
from set.ext $ assume a,
classical.by_cases
(assume : a ∈ frontier {a | p a},
have hac : a ∈ closure {a | p a}, from this.left,
have hai : a ∈ closure {a | ¬ p a},
from have a ∈ - interior {a | p a}, from this.right, by rwa [←closure_compl] at this,
by by_cases p a; simp [h, hp a this, hac, hai, iff_def] {contextual := tt})
(assume hf : a ∈ - frontier {a | p a},
classical.by_cases
(assume : p a,
have hc : a ∈ closure {a | p a}, from subset_closure this,
have hnc : a ∉ closure {a | ¬ p a},
by show a ∉ closure (- {a | p a}); rw [closure_compl]; simpa [frontier, hc] using hf,
by simp [this, hc, hnc])
(assume : ¬ p a,
have hc : a ∈ closure {a | ¬ p a}, from subset_closure this,
have hnc : a ∉ closure {a | p a},
begin
have hc : a ∈ closure (- {a | p a}), from hc,
simp [closure_compl] at hc,
simpa [frontier, hc] using hf
end,
by simp [this, hc, hnc])),
by rw [this]; exact is_closed_union
(is_closed_inter is_closed_closure $ continuous_iff_is_closed.mp hf s hs)
(is_closed_inter is_closed_closure $ continuous_iff_is_closed.mp hg s hs)
/- Continuity and partial functions -/
def pcontinuous (f : α →. β) := ∀ s, is_open s → is_open (f.preimage s)
lemma open_dom_of_pcontinuous {f : α →. β} (h : pcontinuous f) : is_open f.dom :=
by rw [←pfun.preimage_univ]; exact h _ is_open_univ
lemma pcontinuous_iff' {f : α →. β} :
pcontinuous f ↔ ∀ {x y} (h : y ∈ f x), ptendsto' f (nhds x) (nhds y) :=
begin
split,
{ intros h x y h',
rw [ptendsto'_def, nhds_sets, nhds_sets],
rintros s ⟨t, tsubs, opent, yt⟩,
exact ⟨f.preimage t, pfun.preimage_mono _ tsubs, h _ opent, ⟨y, yt, h'⟩⟩
},
intros hf s os,
rw is_open_iff_nhds,
rintros x ⟨y, ys, fxy⟩ t,
rw [mem_principal_sets],
assume h : f.preimage s ⊆ t,
apply mem_sets_of_superset _ h,
have h' : ∀ s ∈ (nhds y).sets, f.preimage s ∈ (nhds x).sets,
{ intros s hs,
have : ptendsto' f (nhds x) (nhds y) := hf fxy,
rw ptendsto'_def at this,
exact this s hs },
show f.preimage s ∈ (nhds x).sets,
apply h', rw nhds_sets, exact ⟨s, set.subset.refl _, os, ys⟩
end
lemma image_closure_subset_closure_image {f : α → β} {s : set α} (h : continuous f) :
f '' closure s ⊆ closure (f '' s) :=
have ∀ (a : α), nhds a ⊓ principal s ≠ ⊥ → nhds (f a) ⊓ principal (f '' s) ≠ ⊥,
from assume a ha,
have h₁ : ¬ map f (nhds a ⊓ principal s) = ⊥,
by rwa[map_eq_bot_iff],
have h₂ : map f (nhds a ⊓ principal s) ≤ nhds (f a) ⊓ principal (f '' s),
from le_inf
(le_trans (map_mono inf_le_left) $ by rw [continuous_iff_continuous_at] at h; exact h a)
(le_trans (map_mono inf_le_right) $ by simp; exact subset.refl _),
neq_bot_of_le_neq_bot h₁ h₂,
by simp [image_subset_iff, closure_eq_nhds]; assumption
lemma mem_closure [topological_space α] [topological_space β]
{s : set α} {t : set β} {f : α → β} {a : α}
(hf : continuous f) (ha : a ∈ closure s) (ht : ∀a∈s, f a ∈ t) : f a ∈ closure t :=
subset.trans (image_closure_subset_closure_image hf) (closure_mono $ image_subset_iff.2 ht) $
(mem_image_of_mem f ha)
end continuous
|
b894140d7b2eeb07ad6ca81888dafa5e29ee6f71 | 8cae430f0a71442d02dbb1cbb14073b31048e4b0 | /src/order/directed.lean | 0456ab1e72b134068f4c8760ac56912f3d3809d6 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/mathlib | 56a2cadd17ac88caf4ece0a775932fa26327ba0e | 442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d | refs/heads/master | 1,693,584,102,358 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 1,693,471,902,000 | 97,922,418 | 1,595 | 352 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,693,445,000 | 1,500,624,130,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 10,915 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import data.set.image
import order.lattice
import order.max
/-!
# Directed indexed families and sets
> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.
This file defines directed indexed families and directed sets. An indexed family/set is
directed iff each pair of elements has a shared upper bound.
## Main declarations
* `directed r f`: Predicate stating that the indexed family `f` is `r`-directed.
* `directed_on r s`: Predicate stating that the set `s` is `r`-directed.
* `is_directed α r`: Prop-valued mixin stating that `α` is `r`-directed. Follows the style of the
unbundled relation classes such as `is_total`.
* `scott_continuous`: Predicate stating that a function between preorders preserves
`is_lub` on directed sets.
## References
* [Gierz et al, *A Compendium of Continuous Lattices*][GierzEtAl1980]
-/
open function
universes u v w
variables {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Sort w} (r r' s : α → α → Prop)
local infix ` ≼ ` : 50 := r
/-- A family of elements of α is directed (with respect to a relation `≼` on α)
if there is a member of the family `≼`-above any pair in the family. -/
def directed (f : ι → α) := ∀ x y, ∃ z, f x ≼ f z ∧ f y ≼ f z
/-- A subset of α is directed if there is an element of the set `≼`-above any
pair of elements in the set. -/
def directed_on (s : set α) := ∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), ∃ z ∈ s, x ≼ z ∧ y ≼ z
variables {r r'}
theorem directed_on_iff_directed {s} : @directed_on α r s ↔ directed r (coe : s → α) :=
by simp [directed, directed_on]; refine ball_congr (λ x hx, by simp; refl)
alias directed_on_iff_directed ↔ directed_on.directed_coe _
theorem directed_on_range {f : ι → α} :
directed r f ↔ directed_on r (set.range f) :=
by simp_rw [directed, directed_on, set.forall_range_iff, set.exists_range_iff]
theorem directed_on_image {s} {f : β → α} :
directed_on r (f '' s) ↔ directed_on (f ⁻¹'o r) s :=
by simp only [directed_on, set.ball_image_iff, set.bex_image_iff, order.preimage]
lemma directed_on.mono' {s : set α} (hs : directed_on r s)
(h : ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ s → r a b → r' a b) :
directed_on r' s :=
λ x hx y hy, let ⟨z, hz, hxz, hyz⟩ := hs _ hx _ hy in ⟨z, hz, h hx hz hxz, h hy hz hyz⟩
lemma directed_on.mono {s : set α} (h : directed_on r s) (H : ∀ {a b}, r a b → r' a b) :
directed_on r' s :=
h.mono' $ λ _ _ _ _, H
theorem directed_comp {ι} {f : ι → β} {g : β → α} :
directed r (g ∘ f) ↔ directed (g ⁻¹'o r) f := iff.rfl
theorem directed.mono {s : α → α → Prop} {ι} {f : ι → α}
(H : ∀ a b, r a b → s a b) (h : directed r f) : directed s f :=
λ a b, let ⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩ := h a b in ⟨c, H _ _ h₁, H _ _ h₂⟩
theorem directed.mono_comp {ι} {rb : β → β → Prop} {g : α → β} {f : ι → α}
(hg : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, x ≼ y → rb (g x) (g y)) (hf : directed r f) :
directed rb (g ∘ f) :=
directed_comp.2 $ hf.mono hg
/-- A monotone function on a sup-semilattice is directed. -/
lemma directed_of_sup [semilattice_sup α] {f : α → β} {r : β → β → Prop}
(H : ∀ ⦃i j⦄, i ≤ j → r (f i) (f j)) : directed r f :=
λ a b, ⟨a ⊔ b, H le_sup_left, H le_sup_right⟩
lemma monotone.directed_le [semilattice_sup α] [preorder β] {f : α → β} :
monotone f → directed (≤) f :=
directed_of_sup
lemma antitone.directed_ge [semilattice_sup α] [preorder β] {f : α → β} (hf : antitone f) :
directed (≥) f :=
directed_of_sup hf
/-- A set stable by supremum is `≤`-directed. -/
lemma directed_on_of_sup_mem [semilattice_sup α] {S : set α}
(H : ∀ ⦃i j⦄, i ∈ S → j ∈ S → i ⊔ j ∈ S) : directed_on (≤) S :=
λ a ha b hb, ⟨a ⊔ b, H ha hb, le_sup_left, le_sup_right⟩
lemma directed.extend_bot [preorder α] [order_bot α] {e : ι → β} {f : ι → α}
(hf : directed (≤) f) (he : function.injective e) :
directed (≤) (function.extend e f ⊥) :=
begin
intros a b,
rcases (em (∃ i, e i = a)).symm with ha | ⟨i, rfl⟩,
{ use b, simp [function.extend_apply' _ _ _ ha] },
rcases (em (∃ i, e i = b)).symm with hb | ⟨j, rfl⟩,
{ use e i, simp [function.extend_apply' _ _ _ hb] },
rcases hf i j with ⟨k, hi, hj⟩,
use (e k),
simp only [he.extend_apply, *, true_and]
end
/-- An antitone function on an inf-semilattice is directed. -/
lemma directed_of_inf [semilattice_inf α] {r : β → β → Prop} {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ a₁ a₂, a₁ ≤ a₂ → r (f a₂) (f a₁)) : directed r f :=
λ x y, ⟨x ⊓ y, hf _ _ inf_le_left, hf _ _ inf_le_right⟩
lemma monotone.directed_ge [semilattice_inf α] [preorder β] {f : α → β} (hf : monotone f) :
directed (≥) f :=
directed_of_inf hf
lemma antitone.directed_le [semilattice_inf α] [preorder β] {f : α → β} (hf : antitone f) :
directed (≤) f :=
directed_of_inf hf
/-- A set stable by infimum is `≥`-directed. -/
lemma directed_on_of_inf_mem [semilattice_inf α] {S : set α}
(H : ∀ ⦃i j⦄, i ∈ S → j ∈ S → i ⊓ j ∈ S) : directed_on (≥) S :=
λ a ha b hb, ⟨a ⊓ b, H ha hb, inf_le_left, inf_le_right⟩
lemma is_total.directed [is_total α r] (f : ι → α) :
directed r f :=
λ i j, or.cases_on (total_of r (f i) (f j)) (λ h, ⟨j, h, refl _⟩) (λ h, ⟨i, refl _, h⟩)
/-- `is_directed α r` states that for any elements `a`, `b` there exists an element `c` such that
`r a c` and `r b c`. -/
class is_directed (α : Type*) (r : α → α → Prop) : Prop :=
(directed (a b : α) : ∃ c, r a c ∧ r b c)
lemma directed_of (r : α → α → Prop) [is_directed α r] (a b : α) : ∃ c, r a c ∧ r b c :=
is_directed.directed _ _
lemma directed_id [is_directed α r] : directed r id := by convert directed_of r
lemma directed_id_iff : directed r id ↔ is_directed α r := ⟨λ h, ⟨h⟩, @directed_id _ _⟩
lemma directed_on_univ [is_directed α r] : directed_on r set.univ :=
λ a _ b _, let ⟨c, hc⟩ := directed_of r a b in ⟨c, trivial, hc⟩
lemma directed_on_univ_iff : directed_on r set.univ ↔ is_directed α r :=
⟨λ h, ⟨λ a b, let ⟨c, _, hc⟩ := h a trivial b trivial in ⟨c, hc⟩⟩, @directed_on_univ _ _⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance is_total.to_is_directed [is_total α r] : is_directed α r :=
by rw ← directed_id_iff; exact is_total.directed _
lemma is_directed_mono [is_directed α r] (h : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, r a b → s a b) : is_directed α s :=
⟨λ a b, let ⟨c, ha, hb⟩ := is_directed.directed a b in ⟨c, h ha, h hb⟩⟩
lemma exists_ge_ge [has_le α] [is_directed α (≤)] (a b : α) : ∃ c, a ≤ c ∧ b ≤ c :=
directed_of (≤) a b
lemma exists_le_le [has_le α] [is_directed α (≥)] (a b : α) : ∃ c, c ≤ a ∧ c ≤ b :=
directed_of (≥) a b
instance order_dual.is_directed_ge [has_le α] [is_directed α (≤)] : is_directed αᵒᵈ (≥) :=
by assumption
instance order_dual.is_directed_le [has_le α] [is_directed α (≥)] : is_directed αᵒᵈ (≤) :=
by assumption
section reflexive
lemma directed_on.insert (h : reflexive r) (a : α) {s : set α} (hd : directed_on r s)
(ha : ∀ b ∈ s, ∃ c ∈ s, a ≼ c ∧ b ≼ c) : directed_on r (insert a s) :=
begin
rintros x (rfl | hx) y (rfl | hy),
{ exact ⟨y, set.mem_insert _ _, h _, h _⟩ },
{ obtain ⟨w, hws, hwr⟩ := ha y hy,
exact ⟨w, set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hws, hwr⟩ },
{ obtain ⟨w, hws, hwr⟩ := ha x hx,
exact ⟨w, set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hws, hwr.symm⟩ },
{ obtain ⟨w, hws, hwr⟩ := hd x hx y hy,
exact ⟨w, set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hws, hwr⟩ },
end
lemma directed_on_singleton (h : reflexive r) (a : α) : directed_on r ({a} : set α) :=
λ x hx y hy, ⟨x, hx, h _, hx.symm ▸ hy.symm ▸ h _⟩
lemma directed_on_pair (h : reflexive r) {a b : α} (hab : a ≼ b) :
directed_on r ({a, b} : set α) :=
(directed_on_singleton h _).insert h _ $ λ c hc, ⟨c, hc, hc.symm ▸ hab, h _⟩
lemma directed_on_pair' (h : reflexive r) {a b : α} (hab : a ≼ b) :
directed_on r ({b, a} : set α) :=
begin
rw set.pair_comm,
apply directed_on_pair h hab,
end
end reflexive
section preorder
variables [preorder α] {a : α}
protected lemma is_min.is_bot [is_directed α (≥)] (h : is_min a) : is_bot a :=
λ b, let ⟨c, hca, hcb⟩ := exists_le_le a b in (h hca).trans hcb
protected lemma is_max.is_top [is_directed α (≤)] (h : is_max a) : is_top a :=
h.to_dual.is_bot
lemma directed_on.is_bot_of_is_min {s : set α} (hd : directed_on (≥) s)
{m} (hm : m ∈ s) (hmin : ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ m → m ≤ a) : ∀ a ∈ s, m ≤ a :=
λ a as, let ⟨x, xs, xm, xa⟩ := hd m hm a as in (hmin x xs xm).trans xa
lemma directed_on.is_top_of_is_max {s : set α} (hd : directed_on (≤) s)
{m} (hm : m ∈ s) (hmax : ∀ a ∈ s, m ≤ a → a ≤ m) : ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ m :=
@directed_on.is_bot_of_is_min αᵒᵈ _ s hd m hm hmax
lemma is_top_or_exists_gt [is_directed α (≤)] (a : α) : is_top a ∨ (∃ b, a < b) :=
(em (is_max a)).imp is_max.is_top not_is_max_iff.mp
lemma is_bot_or_exists_lt [is_directed α (≥)] (a : α) : is_bot a ∨ (∃ b, b < a) :=
@is_top_or_exists_gt αᵒᵈ _ _ a
lemma is_bot_iff_is_min [is_directed α (≥)] : is_bot a ↔ is_min a :=
⟨is_bot.is_min, is_min.is_bot⟩
lemma is_top_iff_is_max [is_directed α (≤)] : is_top a ↔ is_max a := ⟨is_top.is_max, is_max.is_top⟩
variables (β) [partial_order β]
theorem exists_lt_of_directed_ge [is_directed β (≥)] [nontrivial β] : ∃ a b : β, a < b :=
begin
rcases exists_pair_ne β with ⟨a, b, hne⟩,
rcases is_bot_or_exists_lt a with ha|⟨c, hc⟩,
exacts [⟨a, b, (ha b).lt_of_ne hne⟩, ⟨_, _, hc⟩]
end
theorem exists_lt_of_directed_le [is_directed β (≤)] [nontrivial β] : ∃ a b : β, a < b :=
let ⟨a, b, h⟩ := exists_lt_of_directed_ge βᵒᵈ in ⟨b, a, h⟩
end preorder
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semilattice_sup.to_is_directed_le [semilattice_sup α] : is_directed α (≤) :=
⟨λ a b, ⟨a ⊔ b, le_sup_left, le_sup_right⟩⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance semilattice_inf.to_is_directed_ge [semilattice_inf α] : is_directed α (≥) :=
⟨λ a b, ⟨a ⊓ b, inf_le_left, inf_le_right⟩⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance order_top.to_is_directed_le [has_le α] [order_top α] : is_directed α (≤) :=
⟨λ a b, ⟨⊤, le_top, le_top⟩⟩
@[priority 100] -- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance order_bot.to_is_directed_ge [has_le α] [order_bot α] : is_directed α (≥) :=
⟨λ a b, ⟨⊥, bot_le, bot_le⟩⟩
|
7a5353c5f835891eb35691537d1211a64ce6949e | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /src/Init/System/IOError.lean | 4e76bb964ee1b046800b53f5da996b104bb0b639 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 8,953 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon
-/
prelude
import Init.Core
import Init.Data.UInt.Basic
import Init.Data.ToString.Basic
import Init.Data.String.Basic
/--
Imitate the structure of IOErrorType in Haskell:
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/base-4.12.0.0/docs/System-IO-Error.html#t:IOErrorType
-/
inductive IO.Error where
| alreadyExists (filename : Option String) (osCode : UInt32) (details : String) -- EEXIST, EINPROGRESS, EISCONN
| otherError (osCode : UInt32) (details : String) -- EFAULT, default
| resourceBusy (osCode : UInt32) (details : String)
-- EADDRINUSE, EBUSY, EDEADLK, ETXTBSY
| resourceVanished (osCode : UInt32) (details : String)
-- ECONNRESET, EIDRM, ENETDOWN, ENETRESET,
-- ENOLINK, EPIPE
| unsupportedOperation (osCode : UInt32) (details : String)
-- EADDRNOTAVAIL, EAFNOSUPPORT, ENODEV, ENOPROTOOPT
-- ENOSYS, EOPNOTSUPP, ERANGE, ESPIPE, EXDEV
| hardwareFault (osCode : UInt32) (details : String) -- EIO
| unsatisfiedConstraints (osCode : UInt32) (details : String) -- ENOTEMPTY
| illegalOperation (osCode : UInt32) (details : String) -- ENOTTY
| protocolError (osCode : UInt32) (details : String)
-- EPROTO, EPROTONOSUPPORT, EPROTOTYPE
| timeExpired (osCode : UInt32) (details : String)
-- ETIME, ETIMEDOUT
| interrupted (filename : String) (osCode : UInt32) (details : String) -- EINTR
| noFileOrDirectory (filename : String) (osCode : UInt32) (details : String) -- ENOENT
| invalidArgument (filename : Option String) (osCode : UInt32) (details : String)
-- ELOOP, ENAMETOOLONG, EDESTADDRREQ, EILSEQ, EINVAL, EDOM, EBADF
-- ENOEXEC, ENOSTR, ENOTCONN, ENOTSOCK
| permissionDenied (filename : Option String) (osCode : UInt32) (details : String)
-- EACCES, EROFS, ECONNABORTED, EFBIG, EPERM
| resourceExhausted (filename : Option String) (osCode : UInt32) (details : String)
-- EMFILE, ENFILE, ENOSPC, E2BIG, EAGAIN, EMLINK:
-- EMSGSIZE, ENOBUFS, ENOLCK, ENOMEM, ENOSR:
| inappropriateType (filename : Option String) (osCode : UInt32) (details : String)
-- EISDIR, EBADMSG, ENOTDIR:
| noSuchThing (filename : Option String) (osCode : UInt32) (details : String)
-- ENXIO, EHOSTUNREACH, ENETUNREACH, ECHILD, ECONNREFUSED,
-- ENODATA, ENOMSG, ESRCH
| unexpectedEof
| userError (msg : String)
deriving Inhabited
@[export lean_mk_io_user_error]
def IO.userError (s : String) : IO.Error :=
IO.Error.userError s
instance : Coe String IO.Error := ⟨IO.userError⟩
namespace IO.Error
@[export lean_mk_io_error_already_exists_file]
def mkAlreadyExistsFile : String → UInt32 → String → IO.Error :=
alreadyExists ∘ some
@[export lean_mk_io_error_eof]
def mkEofError : Unit → IO.Error := fun _ =>
unexpectedEof
@[export lean_mk_io_error_inappropriate_type_file]
def mkInappropriateTypeFile : String → UInt32 → String → IO.Error :=
inappropriateType ∘ some
@[export lean_mk_io_error_interrupted]
def mkInterrupted : String → UInt32 → String → IO.Error :=
interrupted
@[export lean_mk_io_error_invalid_argument_file]
def mkInvalidArgumentFile : String → UInt32 → String → IO.Error :=
invalidArgument ∘ some
@[export lean_mk_io_error_no_file_or_directory]
def mkNoFileOrDirectory : String → UInt32 → String → IO.Error :=
noFileOrDirectory
@[export lean_mk_io_error_no_such_thing_file]
def mkNoSuchThingFile : String → UInt32 → String → IO.Error :=
noSuchThing ∘ some
@[export lean_mk_io_error_permission_denied_file]
def mkPermissionDeniedFile : String → UInt32 → String → IO.Error :=
permissionDenied ∘ some
@[export lean_mk_io_error_resource_exhausted_file]
def mkResourceExhaustedFile : String → UInt32 → String → IO.Error :=
resourceExhausted ∘ some
@[export lean_mk_io_error_unsupported_operation]
def mkUnsupportedOperation : UInt32 → String → IO.Error :=
unsupportedOperation
@[export lean_mk_io_error_resource_exhausted]
def mkResourceExhausted : UInt32 → String → IO.Error :=
resourceExhausted none
@[export lean_mk_io_error_already_exists]
def mkAlreadyExists : UInt32 → String → IO.Error :=
alreadyExists none
@[export lean_mk_io_error_inappropriate_type]
def mkInappropriateType : UInt32 → String → IO.Error :=
inappropriateType none
@[export lean_mk_io_error_no_such_thing]
def mkNoSuchThing : UInt32 → String → IO.Error :=
noSuchThing none
@[export lean_mk_io_error_resource_vanished]
def mkResourceVanished : UInt32 → String → IO.Error :=
resourceVanished
@[export lean_mk_io_error_resource_busy]
def mkResourceBusy : UInt32 → String → IO.Error :=
resourceBusy
@[export lean_mk_io_error_invalid_argument]
def mkInvalidArgument : UInt32 → String → IO.Error :=
invalidArgument none
@[export lean_mk_io_error_other_error]
def mkOtherError : UInt32 → String → IO.Error :=
otherError
@[export lean_mk_io_error_permission_denied]
def mkPermissionDenied : UInt32 → String → IO.Error :=
permissionDenied none
@[export lean_mk_io_error_hardware_fault]
def mkHardwareFault : UInt32 → String → IO.Error :=
hardwareFault
@[export lean_mk_io_error_unsatisfied_constraints]
def mkUnsatisfiedConstraints : UInt32 → String → IO.Error :=
unsatisfiedConstraints
@[export lean_mk_io_error_illegal_operation]
def mkIllegalOperation : UInt32 → String → IO.Error :=
illegalOperation
@[export lean_mk_io_error_protocol_error]
def mkProtocolError : UInt32 → String → IO.Error :=
protocolError
@[export lean_mk_io_error_time_expired]
def mkTimeExpired : UInt32 → String → IO.Error :=
timeExpired
private def downCaseFirst (s : String) : String := s.modify 0 Char.toLower
def fopenErrorToString (gist fn : String) (code : UInt32) : Option String → String
| some details => downCaseFirst gist ++ " (error code: " ++ toString code ++ ", " ++ downCaseFirst details ++ ")\n file: " ++ fn
| none => downCaseFirst gist ++ " (error code: " ++ toString code ++ ")\n file: " ++ fn
def otherErrorToString (gist : String) (code : UInt32) : Option String → String
| some details => downCaseFirst gist ++ " (error code: " ++ toString code ++ ", " ++ downCaseFirst details ++ ")"
| none => downCaseFirst gist ++ " (error code: " ++ toString code ++ ")"
@[export lean_io_error_to_string]
def toString : IO.Error → String
| unexpectedEof => "end of file"
| inappropriateType (some fn) code details => fopenErrorToString "inappropriate type" fn code details
| inappropriateType none code details => otherErrorToString "inappropriate type" code details
| interrupted fn code details => fopenErrorToString "interrupted system call" fn code details
| invalidArgument (some fn) code details => fopenErrorToString "invalid argument" fn code details
| invalidArgument none code details => otherErrorToString "invalid argument" code details
| noFileOrDirectory fn code _ => fopenErrorToString "no such file or directory" fn code none
| noSuchThing (some fn) code details => fopenErrorToString "no such thing" fn code details
| noSuchThing none code details => otherErrorToString "no such thing" code details
| permissionDenied (some fn) code details => fopenErrorToString details fn code none
| permissionDenied none code details => otherErrorToString details code none
| resourceExhausted (some fn) code details => fopenErrorToString "resource exhausted" fn code details
| resourceExhausted none code details => otherErrorToString "resource exhausted" code details
| alreadyExists none code details => otherErrorToString "already exists" code details
| alreadyExists (some fn) code details => fopenErrorToString "already exists" fn code details
| otherError code details => otherErrorToString details code none
| resourceBusy code details => otherErrorToString "resource busy" code details
| resourceVanished code details => otherErrorToString "resource vanished" code details
| hardwareFault code _ => otherErrorToString "hardware fault" code none
| illegalOperation code details => otherErrorToString "illegal operation" code details
| protocolError code details => otherErrorToString "protocol error" code details
| timeExpired code details => otherErrorToString "time expired" code details
| unsatisfiedConstraints code _ => otherErrorToString "directory not empty" code none
| unsupportedOperation code details => otherErrorToString "unsupported operation" code details
| userError msg => msg
instance : ToString IO.Error := ⟨ IO.Error.toString ⟩
end IO.Error
|
4b6cae453048aaaa52324b141f74f1c2bc6bcb72 | 649957717d58c43b5d8d200da34bf374293fe739 | /src/data/string/defs.lean | 6d13cd954eda146f0302b2b44c3ff335b1f4ebcb | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | Vtec234/mathlib | b50c7b21edea438df7497e5ed6a45f61527f0370 | fb1848bbbfce46152f58e219dc0712f3289d2b20 | refs/heads/master | 1,592,463,095,113 | 1,562,737,749,000 | 1,562,737,749,000 | 196,202,858 | 0 | 0 | Apache-2.0 | 1,562,762,338,000 | 1,562,762,337,000 | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 389 | lean | import data.list.defs
namespace string
def map_tokens (c : char) (f : list string → list string) : string → string :=
intercalate (singleton c) ∘ f ∘ split (= c)
def over_list (f : list char → list char) : string → string :=
list.as_string ∘ f ∘ string.to_list
def split_on (c : char) (s : string) : list string :=
(s.to_list.split_on c).map list.as_string
end string
|
2a2c7ce2d38acf64e184ef9c2ed15f49ec6de585 | 64874bd1010548c7f5a6e3e8902efa63baaff785 | /tests/lean/run/eq22.lean | fae15af6a5c9aefde79d4d349039d6c69f301d82 | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | tjiaqi/lean | 4634d729795c164664d10d093f3545287c76628f | d0ce4cf62f4246b0600c07e074d86e51f2195e30 | refs/heads/master | 1,622,323,796,480 | 1,422,643,069,000 | 1,422,643,069,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 246 | lean | import data.list
open list
definition head {A : Type} : Π (l : list A), l ≠ nil → A,
head nil h := absurd rfl h,
head (a :: l) _ := a
theorem head_cons {A : Type} (a : A) (l : list A) (h : a :: l ≠ nil) : head (a :: l) h = a :=
rfl
|
6358d1ae2e3321d315c67c3f203c3347da79d39a | 6432ea7a083ff6ba21ea17af9ee47b9c371760f7 | /tests/lean/run/stxMacro.lean | 6b8259ac7cf92601731b5d251ef3ed9b5d6a0f90 | [
"Apache-2.0",
"LLVM-exception",
"NCSA",
"LGPL-3.0-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-inner-net-2.0",
"BSD-3-Clause",
"LGPL-2.0-or-later",
"Spencer-94",
"LGPL-2.1-or-later",
"HPND",
"LicenseRef-scancode-pcre",
"ISC",
"LGPL-2.1-only",
"LicenseRef-scancode-other-permissive",
"SunPro",
"CMU-Mach"... | permissive | leanprover/lean4 | 4bdf9790294964627eb9be79f5e8f6157780b4cc | f1f9dc0f2f531af3312398999d8b8303fa5f096b | refs/heads/master | 1,693,360,665,786 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 1,693,350,868,000 | 129,571,436 | 2,827 | 311 | Apache-2.0 | 1,694,716,156,000 | 1,523,760,560,000 | Lean | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 305 | lean | -- Macro for the `syntax` category
macro "many " x:stx : stx => `(stx| ($x)*)
syntax "sum! " (many term:max) : term
macro_rules
| `(sum! $xs*) => do
let mut r ← `(0)
for x in xs do
r ← `($r + $x)
return r
#check sum! 1 2 3
#eval sum! 1 2 3
#check sum!
theorem ex : sum! 1 2 3 = 6 :=
rfl
|
e27219eb2431e6cf6a86e271ac1566d538bc4a3a | 1d265c7dd8cb3d0e1d645a19fd6157a2084c3921 | /src/other/emoji_proof.lean | 370c35dbf6775de6c8d9d23f9b4bfeaee713dd00 | [
"MIT"
] | permissive | hanzhi713/lean-proofs | de432372f220d302be09b5ca4227f8986567e4fd | 4d8356a878645b9ba7cb036f87737f3f1e68ede5 | refs/heads/master | 1,585,580,245,658 | 1,553,646,623,000 | 1,553,646,623,000 | 151,342,188 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 1,109 | lean | def and_emoji (a b : Prop) := a ∧ b
def or_emoji (a b : Prop) := a ∨ b
def iff_emoji (a b : Prop) := a ↔ b
def impl_emoji (a b : Prop) := a → b
infix `😂` : 55 := and_emoji
infix `😆` : 45 := iff_emoji
infix `😶` : 55 := or_emoji
infix `😉` : 50 := and.intro
infix `😇` : 40 := iff.intro
notation `🤜` a : 50 := or.inl a
notation a `🤛` : 50 := or.inr a
notation a `👈` : 90 := and.elim_right a
notation `👉` a : 90 := and.elim_left a
notation `👍` a `👌` b `👌` c := or.elim a b c
example : ∀ p q r, p 😂 (q 😶 r) 😆 (p 😂 q) 😶 (p 😂 r) :=
λ p q r,
(λ pqr : p 😂 (q 😶 r),
(👍 (pqr👈)
👌(λ pfq, 🤜 (👉pqr 😉 pfq))
👌(λ pfr, (👉pqr 😉 pfr) 🤛)
)
)
😇
(λ pqpr : (p 😂 q) 😶 (p 😂 r),
(👍 pqpr
👌(λ pq, 👉pq 😉 (🤜 pq👈))
👌(λ pr, 👉pr 😉 (pr👈 🤛))
)
)
example : ∀ P Q, P 😂 Q 😆 Q 😂 P :=
λ P Q,
(λ pq, pq👈 😉 👉pq)
😇
(λ qp, qp👈 😉 👉qp)
|
01c755b42ace2bde059c679feaa984c4f98f4f11 | cf39355caa609c0f33405126beee2739aa3cb77e | /library/init/data/int/default.lean | 931f9d77ce04b3ea4d2fd9ebed05fa104d8e7e0e | [
"Apache-2.0"
] | permissive | leanprover-community/lean | 12b87f69d92e614daea8bcc9d4de9a9ace089d0e | cce7990ea86a78bdb383e38ed7f9b5ba93c60ce0 | refs/heads/master | 1,687,508,156,644 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 1,684,951,104,000 | 169,960,991 | 457 | 107 | Apache-2.0 | 1,686,744,372,000 | 1,549,790,268,000 | C++ | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 274 | lean | /-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import init.data.int.basic init.data.int.order init.data.int.comp_lemmas
import init.data.int.bitwise
|
d7da56873ceac39ad68ce16f09e178246771ee24 | ce6917c5bacabee346655160b74a307b4a5ab620 | /src/ch2/ex0903.lean | ddbd03ea1472d7c9e317e2b08638a8a5fdde1623 | [] | no_license | Ailrun/Theorem_Proving_in_Lean | ae6a23f3c54d62d401314d6a771e8ff8b4132db2 | 2eb1b5caf93c6a5a555c79e9097cf2ba5a66cf68 | refs/heads/master | 1,609,838,270,467 | 1,586,846,743,000 | 1,586,846,743,000 | 240,967,761 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 485 | lean | namespace hidden
universe u
constant list : Type u → Type u
namespace list
constant cons : Π α : Type u, α → list α → list α
constant nil : Π α : Type u, list α
constant append : Π α : Type u, list α → list α → list α
end list
end hidden
open hidden.list
variable α : Type
variable a : α
variables l1 l2 : hidden.list α
#check cons _ a (nil _)
#check append _ (cons _ a (nil _)) l1
#check append _ (append _ (cons _ a (nil _)) l1) l2
|
abd088c7e639a5d4acca9fad61ad781b3ddaaeab | 33340b3a23ca62ef3c8a7f6a2d4e14c07c6d3354 | /lia/main.lean | b2de282f9a95268131d619ec5bfdcb0dc98a7c48 | [] | no_license | lclem/cooper | 79554e72ced343c64fed24b2d892d24bf9447dfe | 812afc6b158821f2e7dac9c91d3b6123c7a19faf | refs/heads/master | 1,607,554,257,488 | 1,578,694,133,000 | 1,578,694,133,000 | null | 0 | 0 | null | null | null | null | UTF-8 | Lean | false | false | 919 | lean | import ..tactics .reify .normalize .eval_qe .bval
open tactic
meta def lia : tactic unit :=
do reify, normalize, quant_elim,
exact_dec_trivial, -- `[simp only [list.map]],
exact_dec_trivial
axiom any : ∀ {p : Prop}, p
meta def vm_dec_eval : tactic unit :=
do `((qe %%fx).eval _) ← target,
f ← eval_expr formula fx,
match (dec_eval_qe f []) with
| (is_true _) := admit --p`apply ``(any)
| _ := failed
end
meta def vm_dec_eval' : tactic unit :=
do `((qe %%fx).eval _) ← target,
monad.cond (eval_expr bool `(bval %%fx))
admit failed
-- match b with
-- | tt := papply ``(any)
-- | ff := failed
-- end
meta def lia_vm : tactic unit :=
do reify, normalize, quant_elim,
exact_dec_trivial, -- `[simp only [list.map]],
vm_dec_eval
meta def lia_vm' : tactic unit :=
do reify, normalize, quant_elim,
exact_dec_trivial, -- `[simp only [list.map]],
vm_dec_eval' |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.