text
stringlengths
4
39
23501 paper
23502 from
23503 the
23504 year
23505 in
23506 the
23507 subject
23508 English
23509 Language
23510 and
23511 Literature
23512 Studies
23513 Literature
23514 grade
23515 language
23516 English
23517 abstract
23518 This
23519 paper
23520 investigates
23521 how
23522 the
23523 ambivalent
23524 perhaps
23525 even
23526 ambiguous
23527 definition
23528 of
23529 historia
23530 relates
23531 to
23532 the
23533 representation
23534 of
23535 history
23536 in
23537 the
23538 novel
23539 and
23540 how
23541 this
23542 representation
23543 again
23544 relates
23545 to
23546 its
23547 functionalisation
23548 by
23549 Tom
23550 Crick
23551 To
23552 answer
23553 this
23554 question
23555 this
23556 paper
23557 will
23558 primarily
23559 work
23560 with
23561 Linda
23562 Hutcheons
23563 notion
23564 of
23565 historiographic
23566 metafiction
23567 while
23568 also
23569 pointing
23570 out
23571 similarities
23572 to
23573 the
23574 reading
23575 of
23576 Waterland
23577 as
23578 a
23579 trauma
23580 narrative
23581 In
23582 taking
23583 a
23584 closer
23585 look
23586 at
23587 the
23588 protagonistnarrator
23589 himself
23590 this
23591 paper
23592 argues
23593 that
23594 the
23595 protection
23596 from
23597 chaos
23598 and
23599 disorder
23600 which