text
stringlengths
4
39
25801 in
25802 American
25803 literary
25804 history
25805 and
25806 by
25807 repositioning
25808 it
25809 in
25810 a
25811 new
25812 literary
25813 context
25814 What
25815 unites
25816 all
25817 the
25818 essays
25819 is
25820 a
25821 commitment
25822 to
25823 read
25824 Coopers
25825 works
25826 as
25827 culturallyencoded
25828 documents
25829 that
25830 both
25831 reflect
25832 and
25833 give
25834 us
25835 access
25836 to
25837 the
25838 complex
25839 equivocal
25840 mind
25841 that
25842 created
25843 them
25844 This
25845 is
25846 not
25847 to
25848 say
25849 that
25850 the
25851 essays
25852 share
25853 a
25854 common
25855 critical
25856 or
25857 methodological
25858 approach
25859 indeed
25860 they
25861 were
25862 commissioned
25863 and
25864 selected
25865 with
25866 the
25867 specific
25868 intention
25869 of
25870 applying
25871 contending
25872 approaches
25873 in
25874 contemporary
25875 literary
25876 discourse
25877 to
25878 the
25879 canonical
25880 Cooper
25881 While
25882 the
25883 array
25884 of
25885 critical
25886 approaches
25887 represented
25888 in
25889 the
25890 book
25891 is
25892 by
25893 no
25894 means
25895 exhaustive
25896 interpretive
25897 strategies
25898 vary
25899 from
25900 textual