Delete strategy_dataset.jsonl with huggingface_hub

strategy_dataset.jsonl

@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
-{"id": "case.1", "scenario_type": "strategy", "prompt": "A tech startup wants to enter an established search engine market dominated by incumbents. Design a strategy to achieve a creative monopoly by offering unique value and uncovering hidden user needs. Include how the company should seek secrets and build long\u2011term advantages.", "strategy_frameworks": ["Creative Monopoly", "Seek Secrets", "Long\u2011Term Planning"], "gold_rubric": {"must_include": ["unique problem", "creative monopoly", "secret discovery", "long\u2011term planning"], "should_include": ["monopoly profits reinvestment", "high entry barrier", "first\u2011principles approach"], "forbidden": ["competing on price", "generic slogans", "short\u2011term tactics"]}, "good_answers": [{"plan": ["Identify hidden user pain points ignored by incumbents and develop a differentiated search feature that solves a unique problem", "Invest in proprietary technology and data to build high entry barriers and sustain monopoly profits", "Seek secrets by analyzing underutilized datasets and behavioral patterns to discover new opportunities", "Adopt a long\u2011term roadmap that prioritizes technology leadership and brand trust over short\u2011term revenue", "Build distribution partnerships early to embed the service in complementary platforms"], "outcomes": {"monopoly_potential": true, "market_share_target": ">60%", "time_horizon": "5 years"}, "risks": ["technological uncertainty", "user adoption", "regulatory scrutiny"], "owners": ["CEO", "Head of Research"], "timeline": "60 months"}], "bad_answers": ["Launch a similar search engine with marginally better design and compete on price; copy features from competitors without any secret insights; focus on short\u2011term advertising revenue."], "reward_tags": {"creative_monopoly": 1, "secret_search": 1, "long_term_thinking": 1, "sales_strategy": 0, "value_innovation": 0, "antifragility": 0}}
-{"id": "case.2", "scenario_type": "marketing", "prompt": "An enterprise software startup has built a robust product but struggles with adoption. Craft a plan that emphasizes sales and distribution as much as product development, explaining why hidden persuasion and strategic partnerships are crucial.", "strategy_frameworks": ["Hidden Sales", "Distribution Strategy"], "gold_rubric": {"must_include": ["sales is as important as product", "persuasion tactics", "distribution partnerships"], "should_include": ["sales grandmasters", "channel strategy", "long\u2011term customer relationships"], "forbidden": ["assume product sells itself", "ignore marketing", "purely technical focus"]}, "good_answers": [{"plan": ["Identify key decision makers and craft a narrative that connects product benefits to their strategic goals", "Recruit and train sales grandmasters who can build trust and close complex deals", "Develop distribution partnerships with system integrators and consultants to embed the product into larger solutions", "Invest in marketing campaigns that subtly influence perceptions and create long\u2011term brand associations", "Align incentives across engineering, sales, and customer success teams to ensure continuous feedback"], "outcomes": {"adoption_growth": "50% in 12 months", "customer_lifetime_value_increase": "30%"}, "risks": ["misaligned incentives", "partner dependency"], "owners": ["Chief Revenue Officer", "Head of Partnerships"], "timeline": "12 months"}], "bad_answers": ["Rely solely on product quality and expect organic adoption; dismiss sales and marketing as superficial; avoid partnerships and focus only on code."], "reward_tags": {"creative_monopoly": 0, "secret_search": 0, "long_term_thinking": 1, "sales_strategy": 1, "value_innovation": 0, "antifragility": 0}}
-{"id": "case.3", "scenario_type": "innovation", "prompt": "A biotech firm believes most hard problems have been solved. Propose how it can renew its innovation pipeline by believing in secrets, identifying unexplored domains, and pursuing both natural and human secrets to discover breakthrough therapies.", "strategy_frameworks": ["Secret Discovery", "Natural vs Human Secrets"], "gold_rubric": {"must_include": ["belief in secrets", "search for natural and human secrets", "unexplored domains"], "should_include": ["interdisciplinary research", "relentless search", "ethical considerations"], "forbidden": ["assume all knowledge is known", "avoid risk", "copy existing drugs"]}, "good_answers": [{"plan": ["Cultivate a culture that believes hidden insights exist in biology and human behavior", "Map unexplored biological pathways and rare diseases to identify unmet needs", "Encourage interdisciplinary teams to investigate secrets about patient behavior and environmental factors", "Invest in long\u2011term R&D projects with high uncertainty but potentially transformative results", "Forge collaborations with universities and research labs to access cutting\u2011edge discoveries"], "outcomes": {"new_therapies_identified": 3, "patent_portfolio_growth": "40%", "time_horizon": "10 years"}, "risks": ["high R&D cost", "regulatory delays"], "owners": ["Chief Scientific Officer"], "timeline": "10 years"}], "bad_answers": ["Assume all major discoveries are complete; focus on incremental improvements to existing drugs; avoid exploring new disciplines."], "reward_tags": {"creative_monopoly": 0, "secret_search": 1, "long_term_thinking": 1, "sales_strategy": 0, "value_innovation": 0, "antifragility": 0}}
-{"id": "case.4", "scenario_type": "product", "prompt": "A manufacturing company faces stagnation and must decide between incremental improvements (1\u2192n) and creating a radically new product (0\u21921). Design a decision\u2011making approach that uses first\u2011principles thinking to pursue vertical progress instead of copying competitors.", "strategy_frameworks": ["Vertical Progress", "First\u2011Principles Thinking"], "gold_rubric": {"must_include": ["0\u21921 innovation", "first\u2011principles", "unique value proposition"], "should_include": ["resource allocation", "risk assessment", "market differentiation"], "forbidden": ["simple benchmarking", "copying rivals", "pure cost cutting"]}, "good_answers": [{"plan": ["Conduct first\u2011principles analysis of customer needs and production capabilities", "Identify opportunities where radical design can solve core pain points and create new market segments", "Allocate resources toward prototyping and R&D rather than incremental efficiency", "Develop intellectual property to protect the breakthrough and sustain monopoly profits", "Engage early adopters for feedback and build anticipation before mass launch"], "outcomes": {"new_product_launch": true, "market_share_goal": "15% in first 3 years"}, "risks": ["technical feasibility", "market acceptance"], "owners": ["Head of R&D", "Product Manager"], "timeline": "36 months"}], "bad_answers": ["Continue minor feature upgrades to existing products; benchmark competitors\u2019 features and match them; avoid investing in radical innovation due to perceived risk."], "reward_tags": {"creative_monopoly": 1, "secret_search": 0, "long_term_thinking": 1, "sales_strategy": 0, "value_innovation": 0, "antifragility": 0}}
-{"id": "case.5", "scenario_type": "strategy", "prompt": "A consumer electronics company is trapped in price wars within a crowded market. Outline a Blue Ocean strategy that uses value innovation to create uncontested market space, applying the four actions framework (eliminate, reduce, raise, create).", "strategy_frameworks": ["Value Innovation", "Four Actions Framework", "Strategy Canvas"], "gold_rubric": {"must_include": ["uncontested market space", "eliminate", "reduce", "raise", "create"], "should_include": ["value curve", "focus on common customer needs", "cost reduction"], "forbidden": ["competing head\u2011to\u2011head", "slashing prices without differentiation", "ignoring customer insights"]}, "good_answers": [{"plan": ["Identify the factors the industry takes for granted and eliminate those that do not add value", "Reduce overdesigned features that customers are willing to sacrifice", "Raise aspects that matter most to a broad set of customers, such as reliability and user experience", "Create new attributes (e.g., modularity, eco\u2011friendly materials) that open new market segments", "Plot current and proposed value curves to visualize differentiation and align resources"], "outcomes": {"new_market_created": true, "price_premium": "25%", "market_share": "significant"}, "risks": ["customer misperception", "execution complexity"], "owners": ["Chief Strategy Officer", "Design Lead"], "timeline": "24 months"}], "bad_answers": ["Reduce prices further and add more of the same features as competitors; chase incremental differentiation; ignore value innovation frameworks."], "reward_tags": {"creative_monopoly": 0, "secret_search": 0, "long_term_thinking": 1, "sales_strategy": 1, "value_innovation": 1, "antifragility": 0}}
-{"id": "case.6", "scenario_type": "service", "prompt": "A regional hotel chain wants to revamp its budget offerings. Using the four actions framework, recommend which features to eliminate, reduce, raise, and create to deliver superior value at low cost, similar to the Formule\u00a01 example.", "strategy_frameworks": ["Four Actions Framework", "Value Curve"], "gold_rubric": {"must_include": ["eliminate unnecessary features", "reduce overserving", "raise key service elements", "create new offerings"], "should_include": ["cost reduction", "customer convenience", "focus on core needs"], "forbidden": ["adding expensive amenities", "keeping all traditional services", "ignoring feedback"]}, "good_answers": [{"plan": ["Eliminate restaurants and lounges that most budget travelers do not use", "Reduce 24/7 concierge service by automating check\u2011in and focusing staff during peak hours", "Raise bed quality, cleanliness, and sound insulation beyond industry standards", "Create modular room designs and self\u2011service technology for convenience", "Offer value\u2011add services such as free high\u2011speed Wi\u2011Fi and flexible booking options"], "outcomes": {"cost_per_room_reduction": "40%", "customer_satisfaction": "+30%", "market_share_increase": "20%"}, "risks": ["customer backlash to removed services"], "owners": ["Operations Director"], "timeline": "18 months"}], "bad_answers": ["Add more amenities like spas and restaurants to attract premium customers; keep all existing services; raise prices without addressing core needs."], "reward_tags": {"creative_monopoly": 0, "secret_search": 0, "long_term_thinking": 1, "sales_strategy": 1, "value_innovation": 1, "antifragility": 0}}
-{"id": "case.7", "scenario_type": "technology", "prompt": "An enterprise software provider currently offers separate modules for functions like HR, finance, and logistics. Propose how the company can apply value innovation to create an integrated platform that meets common needs across customers and reduces complexity.", "strategy_frameworks": ["Value Innovation", "Commonalities Focus"], "gold_rubric": {"must_include": ["integrated solution", "focus on common customer needs", "reduce customization complexity"], "should_include": ["improve information flow", "economies of scale", "customer education"], "forbidden": ["over\u2011segmenting customers", "retaining silos", "overcharging for customization"]}, "good_answers": [{"plan": ["Assess core processes shared across most customers and design a unified data model", "Develop an integrated platform that allows real\u2011time data exchange and minimal implementation effort", "Educate customers on the benefits of standardization and the inefficiencies of heavy customization", "Price the solution to encourage adoption while capturing value from integration benefits", "Phase migration for existing clients and provide APIs for unique requirements"], "outcomes": {"implementation_time_reduction": "50%", "maintenance_cost_savings": "30%", "customer_retention": "+15%"}, "risks": ["resistance to change", "migration challenges"], "owners": ["Product VP", "Customer Success Head"], "timeline": "30 months"}], "bad_answers": ["Continue selling separate modules; offer extensive customization for each client; ignore the costs of siloed data."], "reward_tags": {"creative_monopoly": 0, "secret_search": 0, "long_term_thinking": 1, "sales_strategy": 1, "value_innovation": 1, "antifragility": 0}}
-{"id": "case.8", "scenario_type": "leadership", "prompt": "A mid\u2011sized manufacturing company faces low employee engagement. Recommend a Blue Ocean leadership approach that uses the leadership canvas and eliminate\u2011reduce\u2011raise\u2011create grid to boost motivation and align the workforce with strategic goals.", "strategy_frameworks": ["Blue Ocean Leadership", "Leadership Canvas", "ERRC Grid"], "gold_rubric": {"must_include": ["engage employees", "eliminate low\u2011value leadership acts", "raise high\u2011impact behaviors", "create new motivators"], "should_include": ["clarity of vision", "fair process", "empowerment"], "forbidden": ["top\u2011down directives only", "ignoring frontline feedback", "maintaining status quo"]}, "good_answers": [{"plan": ["Map current leadership behaviors across different levels using a leadership canvas", "Eliminate rituals and reporting requirements that add little value", "Reduce micromanagement and unnecessary approvals", "Raise coaching, mentoring, and recognition practices to empower teams", "Create new channels for frontline employees to propose ideas and participate in decision\u2011making"], "outcomes": {"employee_engagement_score": "+25%", "productivity_increase": "15%", "turnover_reduction": "10%"}, "risks": ["cultural resistance", "lack of managerial buy\u2011in"], "owners": ["HR Director", "COO"], "timeline": "12 months"}], "bad_answers": ["Mandate higher productivity goals without changing leadership behaviors; enforce more reporting; ignore employee feedback."], "reward_tags": {"creative_monopoly": 0, "secret_search": 0, "long_term_thinking": 1, "sales_strategy": 0, "value_innovation": 1, "antifragility": 0}}
-{"id": "case.9", "scenario_type": "risk_management", "prompt": "A financial services firm wants to prepare for unpredictable market shocks. Develop an antifragile risk management strategy that benefits from volatility using barbell principles, avoids fragile forecasting, and ensures skin in the game.", "strategy_frameworks": ["Antifragility", "Barbell Strategy", "Skin in the Game"], "gold_rubric": {"must_include": ["barbell portfolio", "skin in the game", "benefit from volatility"], "should_include": ["reduce fragility", "focus on asymmetry", "limit downside exposure"], "forbidden": ["reliance on forecasts", "high leverage", "single point of failure"]}, "good_answers": [{"plan": ["Allocate a majority of assets to safe instruments while investing a small portion in highly speculative, high\u2011upside opportunities (barbell)", "Ensure that decision makers have personal exposure to both upside and downside outcomes", "Use options and instruments that profit from volatility rather than trying to predict market movements", "Maintain redundancy and liquidity to survive rare events", "Continuously monitor for fragility and shift exposure away from areas susceptible to catastrophic loss"], "outcomes": {"downside_risk_reduction": "significant", "potential_upside": "large", "survivability": true}, "risks": ["speculative bets fail", "behavioural biases"], "owners": ["Chief Risk Officer", "Portfolio Manager"], "timeline": "Ongoing"}], "bad_answers": ["Use complex models to forecast market movements and concentrate investments in the predicted best sector; employ high leverage to enhance returns; managers avoid personal risk."], "reward_tags": {"creative_monopoly": 0, "secret_search": 0, "long_term_thinking": 1, "sales_strategy": 0, "value_innovation": 0, "antifragility": 1}}
-{"id": "case.10", "scenario_type": "healthcare", "prompt": "A hospital seeks to improve patient outcomes with limited resources. Propose a via negativa strategy that focuses on removing harmful interventions and encouraging small beneficial stressors (e.g., intermittent fasting) rather than adding more treatments.", "strategy_frameworks": ["Via Negativa", "Antifragility"], "gold_rubric": {"must_include": ["remove harmful practices", "apply small stressors", "monitor patient response"], "should_include": ["evidence\u2011based subtraction", "encourage patient self\u2011care", "avoid iatrogenics"], "forbidden": ["overmedication", "introducing unnecessary procedures", "ignoring patient variability"]}, "good_answers": [{"plan": ["Review current treatments and eliminate those with minimal or negative benefit", "Introduce programs like supervised intermittent fasting or stress inoculation to strengthen physiological resilience", "Educate patients on lifestyle changes that reduce fragility", "Monitor outcomes to ensure interventions are beneficial and adjust accordingly", "Promote a culture of 'first, do no harm' and question additive interventions"], "outcomes": {"reduced_complications": "20%", "patient_satisfaction": "+15%", "cost_savings": "10%"}, "risks": ["patient non\u2011compliance", "lack of immediate results"], "owners": ["Chief Medical Officer", "Quality Improvement Team"], "timeline": "24 months"}], "bad_answers": ["Add more medications and procedures to treat symptoms; ignore the side effects of over-treatment; assume that more intervention always equals better care."], "reward_tags": {"creative_monopoly": 0, "secret_search": 0, "long_term_thinking": 1, "sales_strategy": 0, "value_innovation": 0, "antifragility": 1}}
-{"id": "case.11", "scenario_type": "governance", "prompt": "A city government debates whether to centralize services or empower neighbourhood councils. Using antifragile principles and the Triad, recommend an approach that moves the system from fragility to antifragility, emphasizing decentralization, experimentation, and small reversible mistakes.", "strategy_frameworks": ["Triad (Fragile\u2011Robust\u2011Antifragile)", "Decentralisation", "Experimentation"], "gold_rubric": {"must_include": ["move away from fragility", "decentralize decision making", "allow small reversible errors"], "should_include": ["community engagement", "redundancy", "adaptive policies"], "forbidden": ["centralized monoculture", "zero tolerance for mistakes", "large irreversible projects"]}, "good_answers": [{"plan": ["Redistribute authority to neighbourhood councils with clear budgets and accountability", "Encourage pilot projects at a small scale to test solutions and learn from failures", "Foster redundancy by allowing multiple neighbourhoods to try different approaches", "Establish feedback loops to scale successful initiatives and shut down unsuccessful ones", "Ensure leaders bear consequences of decisions to maintain skin in the game"], "outcomes": {"improved_service_delivery": "measurable", "higher_civic_engagement": "+20%", "risk_of_systemic_failure": "reduced"}, "risks": ["coordination challenges", "resource inequality"], "owners": ["Mayor", "City Council"], "timeline": "5 years"}], "bad_answers": ["Centralize all services in a single agency; eliminate local autonomy; implement large, irreversible projects without pilot testing."], "reward_tags": {"creative_monopoly": 0, "secret_search": 0, "long_term_thinking": 1, "sales_strategy": 0, "value_innovation": 0, "antifragility": 1}}
-{"id": "case.12", "scenario_type": "education", "prompt": "An online education platform wants to prepare learners for a volatile job market. Suggest an antifragile curriculum that applies barbell principles and optionality\u2014combining deep expertise with broad exploration and encouraging projects that expose students to randomness.", "strategy_frameworks": ["Antifragility", "Barbell Education", "Optionality"], "gold_rubric": {"must_include": ["barbell education", "build optionality", "expose learners to randomness"], "should_include": ["combine depth and breadth", "embrace errors", "adaptability"], "forbidden": ["overly rigid curriculum", "single career path focus", "punishing failure"]}, "good_answers": [{"plan": ["Structure the curriculum with a core specialization (deep skill) and a wide range of elective experiments across unrelated domains", "Encourage project\u2011based learning that involves uncertainty and real\u2011world problem solving", "Allow learners to design their own learning paths and pivot based on feedback", "Include modules on risk management, adaptation, and resilience", "Measure success by adaptability and portfolio of skills rather than single test scores"], "outcomes": {"graduate_employability": "high", "skill_portfolio": "diverse", "student_engagement": "+20%"}, "risks": ["curriculum complexity", "lack of standardisation"], "owners": ["Chief Academic Officer", "Curriculum Design Team"], "timeline": "3 years"}], "bad_answers": ["Offer a one\u2011size\u2011fits\u2011all curriculum focused solely on one skill; discourage exploration; evaluate students only through standardized tests."], "reward_tags": {"creative_monopoly": 0, "secret_search": 0, "long_term_thinking": 1, "sales_strategy": 0, "value_innovation": 0, "antifragility": 1}}