Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
Search is not available for this dataset
image
image
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

AgriTaxon: Can Large Multimodal Models Identify What They See in Agriculture?

Xin Zeng, Benfeng Xu, Shancheng Fang, Huarui Wu

🌐 Project Page Β· πŸ’» GitHub Β· πŸ“Ž Supplementary Material

Overview

AgriTaxon is the first benchmark for open-ended taxonomic naming in agriculture. It tests whether Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) can correctly name a species from its imageβ€”without predefined options.

The benchmark spans four agricultural domains:

Track Species Source
🌿 Crops 1,971 FAO Ecocrop (via Wikidata P4753)
πŸ„ Livestock 178 FAO DAD-IS (via Wikidata P3380)
πŸ› Pests 3,485 EPPO (via Wikidata P3031)
🌾 Weeds 1,798 EPPO (via Wikidata P3031)
Total 7,432

Every label is linked to authoritative FAO and EPPO databases via Wikidata, forming a traceable authority chain. A companion in-the-wild subset (wild/, real iNaturalist field photos with a multi-image setting) is described below.

Key Features

  • 7,432 species across four agricultural domains with entity-level species/breed labels
  • Authority-grounded labels: every entity linked to FAO/EPPO via Wikidata QIDs
  • Two evaluation protocols: multiple-choice (with semantically hard negatives) and open-ended naming
  • LLM-as-a-Judge scoring with 98% expert agreement for alias validation
  • AgriTaxon-Hard: 1,052-sample diagnostic subset where ≀2 of 14 frontier models answer correctly
  • Reveals a striking seeing-without-naming gap: best model reaches 83% on multiple-choice but drops to 33% on open-ended naming
  • AgriTaxon-Wild (wild/): in-the-wild iNaturalist field photos with a multi-image (K∈{1,3,5}) setting

Dataset Structure

β”œβ”€β”€ images/                     # curated: one Wikimedia Commons image per entity
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ crop/      (1,971)   livestock/ (178)   pest/ (3,485)   weed/ (1,798)
β”œβ”€β”€ annotations/
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ {track}.jsonl           (open-ended: qid, label, image, track, source, wiki, KB_ID)
β”‚   └── {track}_mc.jsonl        (multiple-choice: includes distractor options)
β”œβ”€β”€ splits/
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ hard.json               (AgriTaxon-Hard: 1,052 QIDs + selection criteria)
β”‚   └── hard_model_accuracy.json
β”œβ”€β”€ metadata.json
└── wild/                       # AgriTaxon-Wild: in-the-wild iNaturalist subset (see below)
    β”œβ”€β”€ images/{track}/...      (14,845 field photos, 5 per entity)
    β”œβ”€β”€ annotations/{track}.jsonl + {track}_mc.jsonl
    β”œβ”€β”€ attributions.jsonl      (per-photo license + credit; required)
    β”œβ”€β”€ metadata.json  LICENSES.md

Annotation Fields

Each {track}.jsonl entry contains:

Field Type Description
qid string Wikidata QID (e.g., Q12345)
label string Canonical species name
image string Relative path to image file
track string One of: crop, livestock, pest, weed
source string Wikidata property used for sourcing
enwiki string English Wikipedia article title (optional)
zhwiki string Chinese Wikipedia article title (optional)
ecocropID / faoID / eppoCode string Authority database identifier (track-dependent)

Each {track}_mc.jsonl additionally includes distractor options for multiple-choice evaluation.

Image Sources

Curated images are sourced from Wikimedia Commons under Creative Commons licenses (predominantly CC BY and CC BY-SA). Each image retains its original license. Images with a shorter dimension below 224px have been filtered out; images with max dimension above 4096px have been resized.


🌍 AgriTaxon-Wild (in-the-wild subset)

wild/ is an in-the-wild, multi-image extension. Where the main benchmark uses one curated Wikimedia Commons image per entity, AgriTaxon-Wild uses real iNaturalist research-grade field photographs β€” multiple independent observations per entity β€” to evaluate recognition under realistic field conditions.

Track Entities Coverage vs. main Images
🌿 Crop 1,566 79.5% 7,830
πŸ„ Livestock 13 7.1% 65
πŸ› Pest 374 10.7% 1,870
🌾 Weed 1,016 56.5% 5,080
Total 2,969 39.9% 14,845
  • Strict alignment: Wikidata P3151 (iNaturalist taxon ID) only; exact observation taxon; quality_grade=research, verifiable, non-captive, licensed photos.
  • Multi-image setting: each entity has up to 5 field photos; use the first K ∈ {1,3,5} for the multi-view evaluation. wild/annotations/{track}_mc.jsonl uses the same 4-option, text-embedding-hard-distractor protocol as the main benchmark.
  • Shared qids with the curated set β†’ supports controlled curated-vs-wild comparison.
  • Livestock collapses to 13 entities under strict P3151 (most breeds lack an iNaturalist taxon).
import json
mc = [json.loads(l) for l in open("AgriTaxon/wild/annotations/weed_mc.jsonl")]
ex = mc[0]
print(ex["label"], ex["options"], ex["answer"])
print(ex["images"][:5])     # up to 5 field-image paths under wild/

⚠️ Wild licensing & attribution

Wild images are individual iNaturalist photos, each under its own CC license β€” not uniform, and predominantly NonCommercial. Treat the wild subset as non-commercial, and attribution is required (see wild/attributions.jsonl and wild/LICENSES.md).

License Photos License Photos
CC BY-NC 12,400 CC BY-NC-SA 200
CC BY 1,493 CC BY-NC-ND 175
CC0 387 CC BY-SA 150
CC BY-ND 40

215 photos are NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND / CC BY-ND). Photos & observation metadata Β© their iNaturalist contributors; see wild/attributions.jsonl for per-photo credit.


Usage

pip install huggingface_hub
huggingface-cli download Xin1818/AgriTaxon --repo-type dataset --local-dir AgriTaxon
import json
samples = [json.loads(l) for l in open("AgriTaxon/annotations/crop.jsonl")]
print(f"Loaded {len(samples)} crop species"); print(samples[0])
hard = json.load(open("AgriTaxon/splits/hard.json"))
print(f"AgriTaxon-Hard: {len(hard)} samples")

Evaluation Protocols

Multiple-Choice

Each question presents 4 options: 1 correct answer + 3 semantically hard negatives generated from text embeddings of taxonomically close species.

Open-Ended Naming

Models must produce the species name from scratch without any options. Evaluated with:

  • Exact Match (EM): after normalization (lowercasing, punctuation removal)
  • Acc (LLM-as-a-Judge): GPT-5 Mini validates whether predictions that fail EM are valid aliases (common names, taxonomic synonyms, spelling variants), achieving 98% expert agreement

Main Results

Accuracy (%) on AgriTaxon, ranked by open-ended Acc.

Model MC Mean OE EM OE Acc Hard
gemini-3-pro-preview 82.5 44.0 51.2 9.0
doubao-seed-2-0-pro 79.4 44.1 48.6 6.0
gemini-3-flash-preview 83.0 33.4 48.1 8.7
doubao-seed-2-0-lite 77.6 37.6 44.0 5.6
kimi-k2.5 73.7 30.0 38.0 2.1
gpt-5 78.6 29.6 37.6 8.4
glm-4.6v 65.1 22.7 30.1 6.2
qwen3-vl-235b-a22b 68.4 21.7 27.5 2.2
gpt-5-mini 71.6 22.0 27.4 7.7
qwen3.5-397b-a17b 71.9 21.7 26.8 9.2
qwen3-vl-30b-a3b 59.9 16.0 22.5 2.2
glm-4.6v-flashx 60.3 15.2 19.6 5.8
qwen3.5-35b-a3b 67.8 11.3 17.4 4.2
claude-haiku-4-5 60.4 11.2 14.7 4.7

Licensing

  • Benchmark metadata & annotations: CC BY 4.0
  • Curated images (images/): Wikimedia Commons, predominantly CC BY and CC BY-SA; each retains its original license
  • Wild images (wild/images/): iNaturalist, predominantly CC BY-NC (non-commercial); per-photo license + attribution in wild/attributions.jsonl (see wild/LICENSES.md)
  • Source code & prompts: MIT License
  • Authority identifiers: Wikidata QIDs under CC0; FAO and EPPO identifiers used for reference linking only

Because the wild subset adds NonCommercial images, the repository license is marked other (mixed CC BY / CC BY-NC). Commercial use is limited by the NC images in wild/.

Downloads last month
908