Yashaswat/indian-legal-led-base
Summarization • 0.2B • Updated • 6 • 3
judgement stringlengths 593 492k | summary stringlengths 201 158k |
|---|---|
Appeal No. 623 of 1975.
From the Judgment and Order dated 25 6 74 of the Karna taka 'High Court in Civil Revision No 1981/73.
S.S. JavaIi and B.P. Singh, for the Appellants.
S.V. Gupte and K.N. Bhatt, for the Respondent.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by RAY, C.J.
This appeal by special leave is from the judgm... | The respondent took the disputed land on lease for 5 years from the appellant Corporation, and held it unautho risedly after the lease period expired.
His suit for a permanent injunction against interference with his posses sion, was dismissed, and his appeal rejected.
The appellant then instituted the suit in appeal, ... |
N: Criminal Appeal No. 718 of 1979 From the Judgment and Order dated 11 10 1979 of the Gujarat High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 110/77.
A.K. Trivedi and S.S. Khanduja for the Appellant.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by FAZAL ALI, J.
This appeal is preferred by the three accused in Sessions Case No. 46 of 197... | The respondent a member of the Indian Air Force, retired from service on June 15, 1965 but was reemployed for a period of two years with effect from June 16, 1965.
On September 7, 1966 the respondent was transferred to the Regular Air Force Reserve with effect from June 16, 1965 to June 15, 1970 i.e. for a period of fi... |
it Petition (Civil) No. 623 of 1989.
(Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India).
Rangarajan and San jay Parokh for the Petitioner.
G.B. Pai, V.K. Sharma and R.K. Maheshwari for the Respondents.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by 755 OJHA, J.
The gravamen of the grievance of the petitioner is that even thou... | M/s Dabur India Limited, petitioner in one set of peti tions, is a public limited company engaged in the manufac ture of Ayurvedic as well as Allopathic medicaments, along with cosmetics.
It used to manufacture for and on behalf of M/s Sharda Boiren Laboratories The petitioner in the second set of petitions a Homeopath... |
Appeals Nos.
50 of 1968 and 1201 of 1970.
From the judgment and Order dated the 20th January 1966, and ' 26th November 1968 of the Madras High Court in Writ Appeals Nos. 1124 of 1963 and 153 of 1966.
K.S. Ramamurthy and section Gopalakrishnan, for the appellant (in both the appeals).
S.V. Gupte and A.S. Nambiar, for re... | The appellant, a judicial officer, was convicted and sentenced under the , by a Full Bench of the Orissa High Court.
Registrar of Orissa High Court vs Bardakanta Mishra & Ors.
I.L.R. [1973] Cuttack 134.
The appellant 's career as a judicial officer was far from satisfactory.
When he was working as Additional District a... |
N: Civil Appeal No. 135 of 1991.
From the Judgment and order dated 16.6.1989 of the Madras High Court Crl.
M.P. No. 2717 of 1988.
T.S. Krishnamoorthy Iyer, K. Rajeswara, N.D.B. Raju and K.R. Chaudhary for the Appellant.
K.K. Lahiri, R.K. Jain (NP), Sreekant, N. Terdal, Mrs. Sushma Suri and A Subba Rao for the Responden... | The grandfather of the appellants and respondents had two wives.
The first wife and her only son died during his life time.
The pre deceased son left behind four sons and a daughter.
In 1947, the grand father made three oral gifts of certain properties in favour of his second wife, in lieu of maintenance.
Later, the gr... |
ivil Appeal No. 2010 of 1986.
From the Judgment and Order dated 15.4.
1986 of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in A.A.O. Nos.
737 of 1981 275 of 1982 and 69 of 1984.
Shanker Ghosh, A.V. Rangam and T.V. Ratnam for the Appellant.
Ashok Sen. A. Subba Rao, Qamaruddin, Mrs, Qamaruddin, C.S.S. Rao and S.V. Deshpande for the Res... | % The appellants were contractors for the supply of ballast to PWD.
They were detained under section 3(2) of the .
It was stated in the grounds of detention that on account of business rivalry, appellants and their companions attacked the complainant with fire arms and hand grenades with intent to kill him, FIR was lod... |
"ivil Appeal Nos.\n1399 to 1403 of 1970.\n479 Appeal from the Judgment and order dated 20th December(...TRUNCATED) | "Schedule II, Article 11 of the Court Fees prescribes a sum of Rs. 2/ as court fees in the case of a(...TRUNCATED) |
"Civil Appeal No. 3011 of 1979.\nFrom the Judgment and Order dated the 7th September, 1979 of the Pa(...TRUNCATED) | "On the basis of a simple mortgage executed in his favour in the year 1948, the appellant obtained a(...TRUNCATED) |
"Petition No. 6693 of 1986 etc.\nin Writ Petition (Crl) No. 1171 of 1982.\nUnder Article 32 of the C(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court in the judgment of Laxmi Kant Pandey vs Union of India dated 6th February, 1984 a(...TRUNCATED) |
"N: Criminal Appeal No. 191 of 1971.\n(Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order of the Bo(...TRUNCATED) | "The appellant an owner of a hotel was prosecuted along with five others for forcibly dispossessing (...TRUNCATED) |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 18
Models trained or fine-tuned on Yashaswat/Indian-Legal-Text-ABS