doc2harness / code /containers /README.md
YuyaoGe's picture
Add full evaluation code (GitHub 5411f53) and run instructions
f4533f6 verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
1.57 kB

Evaluation image

stage2 runs every scenario that needs isolation inside one image, built from containers/Dockerfile: a Python runtime with the pinned dependencies in requirements/runtime.lock, an empty /opt/f0, and no OpenCode.

The image contains no product. The caller injects the artifact under test at run time, so one image serves every product.

The stage1 builder image is a different image; see src/stage1/README.md.

Building

docker build --target evaluation \
  --tag doc2harness/evaluation:candidate \
  --file containers/Dockerfile .

That tag is the default the code looks for. Override it with SBH_EVALUATION_IMAGE if you tag differently.

Mirrors

The checked-in defaults use Aliyun's Debian and PyPI mirrors. They are build arguments, not edits to the Dockerfile:

docker build --target evaluation \
  --build-arg DEBIAN_MIRROR=https://deb.debian.org/debian \
  --build-arg DEBIAN_SECURITY_MIRROR=https://security.debian.org/debian-security \
  --build-arg PYPI_INDEX_URL=https://pypi.org/simple \
  --tag doc2harness/evaluation:candidate \
  --file containers/Dockerfile .

Changing a mirror must not change what lands in the image. The Python base is pinned by digest and the Python dependencies by requirements/runtime.lock; a mirror serves those same packages or the build fails.

What the build asserts

The build ends with checks that fail it rather than ship a wrong image: OpenCode is absent, /opt/f0 is empty, and no mini-swe-agent tree, distribution, or cache is present.