SenseBench / README.md
nielsr's picture
nielsr HF Staff
Add link to paper and GitHub repository
ff23e4e verified
|
raw
history blame
2.36 kB
---
language:
- en
license: cc-by-4.0
task_categories:
- image-text-to-text
- visual-question-answering
- image-classification
pretty_name: SenseBench
tags:
- remote-sensing
- image-quality-assessment
- benchmark
---
# SenseBench
> A benchmark for remote sensing low-level visual perception and description in large vision-language models.
๐Ÿ  [GitHub](https://github.com/Zhong-Chenchen/SenseBench) | ๐Ÿ“„ [Paper](https://huggingface.co/papers/2605.10576) | ๐Ÿค— [Hugging Face Subset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Zhongchenchen/SenseBench_subset)
## Overview
SenseBench is the first dedicated diagnostic benchmark for remote sensing (RS) low-level visual perception and description. Driven by a physics-based hierarchical taxonomy, it features over 10K curated instances across 6 major and 22 fine-grained RS degradation categories. It is designed to evaluate whether Vision-Language Models (VLMs) can overcome the domain gap to perceive and articulate RS-specific artifacts.
The benchmark evaluation consists of two complementary protocols:
1. **Objective low-level visual perception**: Evaluating the model's ability to identify the presence and type of distortions.
2. **Subjective diagnostic description**: Evaluating the model's ability to articulate RS artifacts in natural language based on completeness, correctness, and faithfulness.
## Supported Tasks
- **Visual Question Answering**: Multiple-choice questions assessing degradation type and severity.
- **Image-to-Text / Diagnostic Description**: Natural language generation describing visual artifacts.
## Language
- English
## Data format
Each example contains image paths, a question, an answer, and metadata describing the distortion type.
```json
{
"id": "4fda312e-70d2-4df7-b1f7-2f06955bf338",
"images": [
"images/4fda312e-70d2-4df7-b1f7-2f06955bf338_0.png",
"images/4fda312e-70d2-4df7-b1f7-2f06955bf338_1.png"
],
"question": "Using the options provided, rate the overall quality of Image 2 compared to Image 1.
A.No/Slight distortion
B.Moderate distortion
C.Severe distortion",
"answer": "A",
"meta": {
"image_count": "multi",
"modality": "RGB",
"task": "how",
"domain": "general",
"distortion_family": "blur",
"distortion_type": "blur_gaussian",
"distortion_complexity": "single",
"comparison": "intra-image"
}
}
```