Datasets:
Tasks:
Image-to-3D
Modalities:
Geospatial
Languages:
English
Tags:
gaussian-splatting
novel-view-synthesis
3d-reconstruction
semantic-segmentation
remote-sensing
drone-imagery
License:
| license: cc-by-nc-4.0 | |
| pretty_name: TwinWorld 2026 Challenge Dataset | |
| language: | |
| - en | |
| task_categories: | |
| - image-to-3d | |
| tags: | |
| - gaussian-splatting | |
| - novel-view-synthesis | |
| - 3d-reconstruction | |
| - semantic-segmentation | |
| - remote-sensing | |
| - drone-imagery | |
| - urban-scene | |
| - eccv-2026 | |
| # TwinWorld 2026 Dataset | |
| Drone-captured urban building scenes for the TwinWorld 2026 (ECCV) challenge: | |
| Gaussian Splatting-based novel-view synthesis and 3D reconstruction (geometry | |
| and semantics). The challenge data is preprocessed from two real-world | |
| collections: | |
| - **TUM**, from [TUM2TWIN](https://tum2t.win/) | |
| - **Gold Coast**, from [GT-LOD3-Benchmark](https://github.com/gdslab/GT-LOD3-Benchmark) | |
| <table> | |
| <tr> | |
| <td width="50%"><img src="media/Fig_TUM.png" alt="TUM2TWIN subsets used in this challenge" width="100%"></td> | |
| <td width="50%"><img src="media/Fig_GoldCoast.png" alt="Gold Coast local visualization" width="100%"></td> | |
| </tr> | |
| <tr> | |
| <td><sub>TUM2TWIN subsets used in this challenge. <b style="color:red">Red</b> = development scenes, <b style="color:blue">blue</b> = final-testing scenes.</sub></td> | |
| <td><sub>Local visualization of the Gold Coast data.</sub></td> | |
| </tr> | |
| </table> | |
| ## What's included | |
| ``` | |
| Twinworld_Datasets/ | |
| ├── Data_TUM/ | |
| │ └── scene_000 .. scene_008/ | |
| │ ├── train/ | |
| │ │ ├── images/*.JPG | |
| │ │ └── sparse/0/ | |
| │ │ ├── cameras.txt | |
| │ │ ├── images.txt | |
| │ │ ├── points3D.txt | |
| │ │ └── points3D.ply # initialization point cloud | |
| │ ├── test/ | |
| │ │ ├── images/*.JPG # scene_000-003 only | |
| │ │ └── sparse/0/ | |
| │ │ ├── cameras.txt | |
| │ │ └── images.txt # poses only, always provided | |
| │ └── 3d_gt/ | |
| │ └── point_cloud.ply # scene_000-003 only, x, y, z | |
| ├── Data_Goldcoast/ | |
| │ └── scene_009 .. scene_012/ # same layout as above | |
| │ └── 3d_gt/point_cloud.ply # scene_009-010 only, x, y, z, classification | |
| └── script/ | |
| └── render_test_poses.py | |
| ``` | |
| `train/` and `test/` inside one scene share the same world coordinate system | |
| (one joint COLMAP reconstruction per scene), so a model trained on `train/` | |
| can be rendered directly at the poses listed in `test/sparse/0/`. Camera | |
| intrinsics/extrinsics use the standard COLMAP text format (`cameras.txt`, | |
| `images.txt`); `points3D` is triangulated from all images (train and test | |
| alike) and is only provided under `train/sparse/0/`. | |
| The ground-truth point cloud (where provided) carries `x`, `y`, `z` for TUM | |
| scenes, plus an integer `classification` for Gold Coast scenes: | |
| | ID | Class | | |
| |---:|---| | |
| | 0 | ground | | |
| | 1 | wall | | |
| | 2 | roof | | |
| | 3 | window | | |
| | 4 | other | | |
| | 255 | ignore | | |
| ## Development scenes vs. final testing scenes | |
| | | TUM | Gold Coast | What you get | | |
| |---|---|---|---| | |
| | **Development** | `scene_000`–`scene_003` | `scene_009`–`scene_010` | Everything: `train/`, `test/images` + `test/sparse/0`, and `3d_gt/point_cloud.ply`. | | |
| | **Final testing** | `scene_004`–`scene_008` | `scene_011`–`scene_012` | `train/` and `test/sparse/0` (camera poses only). No `test/images` and no `3d_gt/point_cloud.ply` are included. | | |
| For final-testing scenes, `test/sparse/0/images.txt` still lists the full | |
| camera pose for every held-out frame, so you always know exactly which | |
| viewpoints to render, even though you never receive the photos or geometry | |
| those poses were held out from. Development scenes give you everything | |
| locally so you can self-check before relying on the final-testing scenes. | |
| ## Training example | |
| Using [graphdeco-inria/gaussian-splatting](https://github.com/graphdeco-inria/gaussian-splatting) | |
| (any other method/codebase works the same way, as long as it consumes | |
| COLMAP-format input): | |
| ```bash | |
| git clone --recursive https://github.com/graphdeco-inria/gaussian-splatting | |
| cd gaussian-splatting | |
| python train.py -s <path-to>/Twinworld_Datasets/Data_Goldcoast/scene_009/train -m <output_dir> | |
| ``` | |
| Do **not** pass `--eval`: the train/test split is already fixed by this | |
| dataset's own `train/`/`test/` folders, so `train.py` should not carve out | |
| its own held-out views from `train/`. | |
| ## Rendering test views | |
| `script/render_test_poses.py` renders a trained model at this dataset's test | |
| camera poses. It targets the vanilla `gaussian-splatting` repo above, so copy | |
| it into that repo's root (next to `train.py`) and run it from there: | |
| ```bash | |
| python render_test_poses.py \ | |
| --model_ply <output_dir>/point_cloud/iteration_30000/point_cloud.ply \ | |
| --camera_pose_dir <path-to>/Twinworld_Datasets/Data_Goldcoast/scene_009/test/sparse/0 \ | |
| --output_dir <render_dir>/scene_009 | |
| ``` | |
| This writes `<render_dir>/scene_009/rgb/<frame_id>.png`, one image per pose | |
| in `test/sparse/0/images.txt`, named after that pose's own image name. If you | |
| used a different method/codebase, adapt the model-loading and rendering calls | |
| to your own repo, keeping the same camera-pose parsing | |
| (`cameras.txt`/`images.txt`) and output naming. | |
| ## Checking your results with `metrics.py` | |
| For development scenes, where the real test photos are provided locally, you | |
| can self-check PSNR/SSIM/LPIPS with `gaussian-splatting`'s own | |
| [`metrics.py`](https://github.com/graphdeco-inria/gaussian-splatting/blob/main/metrics.py). | |
| It expects renders and reference photos arranged in its own `renders/`/`gt/` | |
| layout rather than the flat `rgb/` folder `render_test_poses.py` produces, so | |
| a quick reorganization is needed first. See `metrics.py`'s own usage notes | |
| for the exact layout it expects. | |
| Final-testing scenes have no local ground truth, so scores for those only | |
| come back after official evaluation. | |
| ## References | |
| Wysocki, Olaf, et al. "TUM2TWIN: Introducing the large-scale multimodal urban | |
| digital twin benchmark dataset." *ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote | |
| Sensing* 232 (2026): 810–830. | |
| Kim, Han Sae, et al. "GT-LOD3: LOD3 Semantic 3D Building Reconstruction | |
| Benchmark Dataset." *ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and | |
| Spatial Information Sciences* 11 (2026): 293–302. | |