Unnamed: 0 int64 | acl.id string | X1 int64 | text string | label string | type string | target string | level string | split string | round.base int64 | annotator string | round string | acl.id.matched string | is_animosity bool | is_dehumanization bool | is_derogation bool | is_none bool | is_support bool | is_threatening bool | derogation_output string | animosity_output string | dehumanization_output string | threatening_output string | support_output string | pred_derogation bool | target_group_derogation string | main_type_derogation string | justification_derogation string | confidence_derogation float64 | pred_animosity bool | target_group_animosity string | main_type_animosity string | justification_animosity string | confidence_animosity float64 | pred_dehumanization bool | target_group_dehumanization string | main_type_dehumanization string | justification_dehumanization string | confidence_dehumanization float64 | pred_threatening bool | target_group_threatening string | main_type_threatening string | justification_threatening string | confidence_threatening float64 | pred_support bool | target_group_support string | main_type_support string | justification_support string | confidence_support float64 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 | acl10001 | 6 | asian people are the shit | nothate | none | none | original | test | 1 | GNZuCtwed3 | 1 | null | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': 'Asian people', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The statement uses informal slang 'the shit' which in contemporary usage is often positive, implying admiration or liking rather than insult or denigration. The target group is identifiable, but there's no explicit negativity or d... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': 'Asian people', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The statement 'asian people are the shit' typically expresses a positive sentiment, often interpreted as a compliment or admiration towards the group. There is no implicit or explicit hostility, negativity, or denigration in this s... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'Asian people', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The phrase 'asian people are the shit' does not involve an explicit non-human comparison or a metaphor that equates the group to a non-human entity. It is a complimentary expression using profanity to convey emphasis and admir... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Asian people', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains a derogatory term that might be perceived as offensive, but there is no indication of intent or incitement to cause harm. Therefore, it is not classified as threatening based on the given criteria.', 'confidence... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains a positive statement about Asian people. It does not reference any hateful events, organizations, or individuals, nor does it glorify or justify any form of hate. This does not meet the criteria for support of a hateful enti... | false | Asian people | null | The statement uses informal slang 'the shit' which in contemporary usage is often positive, implying admiration or liking rather than insult or denigration. The target group is identifiable, but there's no explicit negativity or derrogation. | 0.85 | false | Asian people | null | The statement 'asian people are the shit' typically expresses a positive sentiment, often interpreted as a compliment or admiration towards the group. There is no implicit or explicit hostility, negativity, or denigration in this statement. | 0.9 | false | Asian people | null | The phrase 'asian people are the shit' does not involve an explicit non-human comparison or a metaphor that equates the group to a non-human entity. It is a complimentary expression using profanity to convey emphasis and admiration, not dehumanization. | 0.95 | false | Asian people | null | The text contains a derogatory term that might be perceived as offensive, but there is no indication of intent or incitement to cause harm. Therefore, it is not classified as threatening based on the given criteria. | 0.95 | false | null | null | The text contains a positive statement about Asian people. It does not reference any hateful events, organizations, or individuals, nor does it glorify or justify any form of hate. This does not meet the criteria for support of a hateful entity. | 0.9 |
8 | acl10003 | 8 | i hate wearing black in the summer! | nothate | none | none | original | test | 1 | LqLKTtrOmx | 1 | null | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The statement does not target any specific group or identity for derogation. It expresses a personal dislike for wearing a specific color in a specific season, which is not related to any protected characteristic.', 'confidence': 1.0} | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text is expressing a personal preference about clothing choices and season, without targeting any group or conveying hostility towards any identity or demographic.', 'confidence': 0.95} | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses a personal dislike for wearing a certain color during a season. It does not involve any comparison of humans to non-human entities nor does it target any specific group.', 'confidence': 1.0} | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not express any intent or incitement to harm any group or individual. It is a personal dislike for wearing black in the summer without threatening language.', 'confidence': 1.0} | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses a personal dislike for wearing black clothing during summer; it does not mention or support any hateful entity or ideology.', 'confidence': 1.0} | false | null | null | The statement does not target any specific group or identity for derogation. It expresses a personal dislike for wearing a specific color in a specific season, which is not related to any protected characteristic. | 1 | false | null | null | The text is expressing a personal preference about clothing choices and season, without targeting any group or conveying hostility towards any identity or demographic. | 0.95 | false | null | null | The text expresses a personal dislike for wearing a certain color during a season. It does not involve any comparison of humans to non-human entities nor does it target any specific group. | 1 | false | null | null | The text does not express any intent or incitement to harm any group or individual. It is a personal dislike for wearing black in the summer without threatening language. | 1 | false | null | null | The text expresses a personal dislike for wearing black clothing during summer; it does not mention or support any hateful entity or ideology. | 1 |
12 | acl10007 | 12 | this drink sucks, it's awful | nothate | none | none | original | test | 1 | oemYWm1Tjg | 1 | null | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text criticizes a drink and does not target any group or identity. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for Derogation.', 'confidence': 1.0} | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not target any specific group or identity and is solely expressing an opinion about a drink, which does not qualify as Animosity.', 'confidence': 0.99} | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The statement expresses a personal opinion about a drink, using terms like 'sucks' and 'awful' as derogatory descriptors. It does not involve any comparison or metaphor that equates a group or individual to a non-human entity. Therefore... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The statement 'this drink sucks, it's awful' is a negative opinion about a drink, but it does not involve any threat or intention to harm a group or individual. The comment is focused on expressing dissatisfaction with a product rather tha... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text is a negative review of a drink and does not reference or support any hateful entity, action, or symbol.', 'confidence': 1.0} | false | null | null | The text criticizes a drink and does not target any group or identity. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for Derogation. | 1 | false | null | null | The text does not target any specific group or identity and is solely expressing an opinion about a drink, which does not qualify as Animosity. | 0.99 | false | null | null | The statement expresses a personal opinion about a drink, using terms like 'sucks' and 'awful' as derogatory descriptors. It does not involve any comparison or metaphor that equates a group or individual to a non-human entity. Therefore, it does not meet the definition of dehumanization. | 1 | false | null | null | The statement 'this drink sucks, it's awful' is a negative opinion about a drink, but it does not involve any threat or intention to harm a group or individual. The comment is focused on expressing dissatisfaction with a product rather than inciting harm. | 1 | false | null | null | The text is a negative review of a drink and does not reference or support any hateful entity, action, or symbol. | 1 |
17 | acl10011 | 17 | Politicians are arseholes | nothate | none | none | original | test | 1 | TrRF46JWfP | 1 | null | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': 'Politicians', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text uses an insult 'arseholes' towards a group 'Politicians', which is a profession, not a protected identity group. Derogation requires explicit negativity towards a protected identity group, which is not present here.", 'con... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': 'politicians', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses a negative opinion about politicians using an explicit derogatory term, which aligns more with explicit derogation rather than animosity. Animosity typically involves implicit hostility or denigration by framing, ... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'Politicians', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text uses a general derogatory term 'arseholes' to describe 'Politicians', which is an insult but not a non-human comparison. It lacks the necessary comparison to a non-human entity for dehumanization.", 'confidence': 0.95} | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Politicians', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses derogation towards a group (politicians) but does not contain an actionable threat or incitement to harm. It is simply a rude or negative opinion without any intent or advocacy for harm.', 'confidence': 1.0} | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses animosity towards politicians in general but does not support or glorify any hateful entity.', 'confidence': 0.9} | false | Politicians | null | The text uses an insult 'arseholes' towards a group 'Politicians', which is a profession, not a protected identity group. Derogation requires explicit negativity towards a protected identity group, which is not present here. | 0.85 | false | politicians | null | The text expresses a negative opinion about politicians using an explicit derogatory term, which aligns more with explicit derogation rather than animosity. Animosity typically involves implicit hostility or denigration by framing, which is not present here. | 0.85 | false | Politicians | null | The text uses a general derogatory term 'arseholes' to describe 'Politicians', which is an insult but not a non-human comparison. It lacks the necessary comparison to a non-human entity for dehumanization. | 0.95 | false | Politicians | null | The text expresses derogation towards a group (politicians) but does not contain an actionable threat or incitement to harm. It is simply a rude or negative opinion without any intent or advocacy for harm. | 1 | false | null | null | The text expresses animosity towards politicians in general but does not support or glorify any hateful entity. | 0.9 |
20 | acl10014 | 20 | This shitty camera is awful in taking pictures | nothate | none | none | original | test | 1 | vDe7GN0NrL | 1 | null | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not target a group or identity with explicit negativity. It criticizes a camera, which is an object, not a group or identity. Thus, it does not meet the criteria for derogation.', 'confidence': 0.95} | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text is a negative comment about a camera's performance, not about a group or identity.", 'confidence': 1.0} | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text is a complaint about the performance of a camera and does not involve any human target or non-human comparison related to humans. It contains general dissatisfaction and criticism of a product.', 'confidence': 1.0} | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The statement expresses dissatisfaction with a product (a camera) and does not involve any threatening language, intent to harm, or targeting of a group. It is a product review, not a threat.', 'confidence': 1.0} | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text does not mention or support any hate entity/event. It is a complaint about a camera's performance.", 'confidence': 1.0} | false | null | null | The text does not target a group or identity with explicit negativity. It criticizes a camera, which is an object, not a group or identity. Thus, it does not meet the criteria for derogation. | 0.95 | false | null | null | The text is a negative comment about a camera's performance, not about a group or identity. | 1 | false | null | null | The text is a complaint about the performance of a camera and does not involve any human target or non-human comparison related to humans. It contains general dissatisfaction and criticism of a product. | 1 | false | null | null | The statement expresses dissatisfaction with a product (a camera) and does not involve any threatening language, intent to harm, or targeting of a group. It is a product review, not a threat. | 1 | false | null | null | The text does not mention or support any hate entity/event. It is a complaint about a camera's performance. | 1 |
24 | acl10018 | 24 | I hate politicians so much, I wish we got rid of them all | nothate | none | none | original | test | 1 | TrRF46JWfP | 1 | null | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': 'politicians', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "While the text expresses strong negative emotions towards politicians, it does not specifically target a recognized identity or protected group. The term 'politicians' refers to a professional group rather than a social identity or... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': 'politicians', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The statement expresses a strong dislike toward politicians, but it is a direct expression of dislike rather than an implicit or subtle hostile discrimination toward the group. The text does not meet the criteria for Animosity, as i... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'Politicians', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses a strong dislike towards politicians but does not use non-human metaphors or comparisons to dehumanize them. It advocates for their removal, which is political sentiment, not dehumanization.', 'confidence': 0... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'politicians', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text expresses a strong negative sentiment towards politicians but lacks a specific call to action or incitement to harm. The phrase 'I wish we got rid of them all' indicates a wish, not an actionable threat with identifiable ... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses animosity towards politicians in general, but it does not glorify or support any recognized hateful entity or event. It lacks mention of any specific hate figure or group and does not provide explicit endorsement or support... | false | politicians | null | While the text expresses strong negative emotions towards politicians, it does not specifically target a recognized identity or protected group. The term 'politicians' refers to a professional group rather than a social identity or demographic group. Additionally, the text lacks explicit demeaning, | 0.85 | false | politicians | null | The statement expresses a strong dislike toward politicians, but it is a direct expression of dislike rather than an implicit or subtle hostile discrimination toward the group. The text does not meet the criteria for Animosity, as it does not employ implicit innuendo or framing devices to convey a w | 0.8 | false | Politicians | null | The text expresses a strong dislike towards politicians but does not use non-human metaphors or comparisons to dehumanize them. It advocates for their removal, which is political sentiment, not dehumanization. | 0.9 | false | politicians | null | The text expresses a strong negative sentiment towards politicians but lacks a specific call to action or incitement to harm. The phrase 'I wish we got rid of them all' indicates a wish, not an actionable threat with identifiable harm. | 0.8 | false | null | null | The text expresses animosity towards politicians in general, but it does not glorify or support any recognized hateful entity or event. It lacks mention of any specific hate figure or group and does not provide explicit endorsement or support for hateful actions. | 0.95 |
25 | acl10019 | 25 | i'm going to kill Amy | nothate | none | none | original | test | 1 | GNZuCtwed3 | 1 | null | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The statement expresses a violent intent towards an individual (Amy) rather than a group or identity, which does not fit the definition of Derogation that focuses on groups.', 'confidence': 0.9} | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains a direct threat against an individual (Amy) rather than hostility toward a group. Therefore, it does not fit the criteria for Animosity, which requires implicit hostility toward a group.', 'confidence': 0.95} | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains a direct threat of violence but does not include language that equates the target to a non-human entity. There is no explicit non-human comparison or assignment with malicious intent, and the language does not fulfill ... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The threat mentioned is directed towards an individual 'Amy', without reference to any group or identity. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria of a threatening statement against a group, as per the provided guidelines.", 'confidence': ... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains a threat but does not mention or glorify any hate figure, group, or ideology. It doesn't meet the criteria for 'support' as defined for the task.", 'confidence': 0.9} | false | null | null | The statement expresses a violent intent towards an individual (Amy) rather than a group or identity, which does not fit the definition of Derogation that focuses on groups. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text contains a direct threat against an individual (Amy) rather than hostility toward a group. Therefore, it does not fit the criteria for Animosity, which requires implicit hostility toward a group. | 0.95 | false | null | null | The text contains a direct threat of violence but does not include language that equates the target to a non-human entity. There is no explicit non-human comparison or assignment with malicious intent, and the language does not fulfill the criteria for dehumanization. | 1 | false | null | null | The threat mentioned is directed towards an individual 'Amy', without reference to any group or identity. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria of a threatening statement against a group, as per the provided guidelines. | 0.8 | false | null | null | The text contains a threat but does not mention or glorify any hate figure, group, or ideology. It doesn't meet the criteria for 'support' as defined for the task. | 0.9 |
27 | acl10020 | 27 | boris johnson is a cunt | nothate | none | none | original | test | 1 | TbUBpfn6iP | 1 | null | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains a derogatory term aimed at an individual, 'Boris Johnson', rather than a group or identity protected class. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for derogation as defined by the guidelines, which require explicit negat... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The statement contains an explicit derogatory term directed at a specific individual, not a group. It does not indicate implicit hostility or animosity towards a group.', 'confidence': 0.9} | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text uses a derogatory term directed at Boris Johnson, but it does not equate him to a non-human entity, which is required for dehumanization. This is an example of derogation through the use of a slur.', 'confidence': 1.0} | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The phrase is an explicit insult directed at an individual, Boris Johnson, without any intent or incitement to harm. It does not meet the criteria for being classified as threatening under the taxonomy provided.', 'confidence': 1.0} | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': 'Boris Johnson', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not glorify or support any hateful entity. It expresses a derogatory opinion about Boris Johnson, who is a politically contested figure but does not meet the criteria for an unambiguously hateful entity.', 'confidence... | false | null | null | The text contains a derogatory term aimed at an individual, 'Boris Johnson', rather than a group or identity protected class. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for derogation as defined by the guidelines, which require explicit negativity towards a group. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The statement contains an explicit derogatory term directed at a specific individual, not a group. It does not indicate implicit hostility or animosity towards a group. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text uses a derogatory term directed at Boris Johnson, but it does not equate him to a non-human entity, which is required for dehumanization. This is an example of derogation through the use of a slur. | 1 | false | null | null | The phrase is an explicit insult directed at an individual, Boris Johnson, without any intent or incitement to harm. It does not meet the criteria for being classified as threatening under the taxonomy provided. | 1 | false | Boris Johnson | null | The text does not glorify or support any hateful entity. It expresses a derogatory opinion about Boris Johnson, who is a politically contested figure but does not meet the criteria for an unambiguously hateful entity. | 0.9 |
29 | acl10022 | 29 | goat fucker, goat lover, it's all gross and bestiality! | nothate | none | none | original | test | 1 | LqLKTtrOmx | 1 | null | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': 'hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context', 'justification': "The text contains derogatory terms such as 'goat fucker' and 'goat lover', which are used as insults. These phrases do not refer to a specific human group, but are formulated ... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains explicit derogatory language and insults, which do not fall under the category of Animosity as they are direct and overt in their negativity.', 'confidence': 0.95} | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text uses derogatory language but does not make an explicit non-human comparison of a group to non-human entities with malicious intent. It seems to target individual actions rather than a group identity. Thus, it does not meet the ... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text uses derogatory language and insults relating to bestiality, but it lacks a specific actionable intent or call for harm against a group. It is thus classified as derogation rather than threatening language.', 'confidence': 0.9} | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains derogatory and abusive language, but it does not explicitly glorify or support any hateful entities as defined by the criteria. It does not reference any known hate figure, group, or event.', 'confidence': 0.9} | true | null | hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context | The text contains derogatory terms such as 'goat fucker' and 'goat lover', which are used as insults. These phrases do not refer to a specific human group, but are formulated in a way typically directed at groups to demean them through explicit slurs. It fits under hateful use of slurs and insults, | 0.95 | false | null | null | The text contains explicit derogatory language and insults, which do not fall under the category of Animosity as they are direct and overt in their negativity. | 0.95 | false | null | null | The text uses derogatory language but does not make an explicit non-human comparison of a group to non-human entities with malicious intent. It seems to target individual actions rather than a group identity. Thus, it does not meet the strict criteria for dehumanization. | 0.8 | false | null | null | The text uses derogatory language and insults relating to bestiality, but it lacks a specific actionable intent or call for harm against a group. It is thus classified as derogation rather than threatening language. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text contains derogatory and abusive language, but it does not explicitly glorify or support any hateful entities as defined by the criteria. It does not reference any known hate figure, group, or event. | 0.9 |
33 | acl10026 | 33 | People that say all French are filthy, smelly and lazy are wrong | nothate | none | none | original | test | 1 | oemYWm1Tjg | 1 | null | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text refutes a derogatory stereotype about French people, stating that those who hold such views are wrong. There is no explicit negativity directed at the identity group, thus it is not classified as Derogation.', 'confidence': 0.95} | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The statement refutes rather than supports a negative stereotype about French people, thus does not express animosity.', 'confidence': 0.9} | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'French', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The statement addresses stereotypes about the French being 'filthy, smelly, and lazy' but rejects those stereotypes. It does not explicitly compare the group to a non-human entity, thus not meeting the criteria for dehumanization.",... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not contain a threat or advocacy for harm towards any group. Instead, it counters derogatory statements about the French, indicating disbelief or disagreement with the negative stereotypes mentioned.', 'confidence': 0.9} | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The statement refutes a stereotype about French people, indicating disagreement with any derogatory or hateful view towards them.', 'confidence': 0.95} | false | null | null | The text refutes a derogatory stereotype about French people, stating that those who hold such views are wrong. There is no explicit negativity directed at the identity group, thus it is not classified as Derogation. | 0.95 | false | null | null | The statement refutes rather than supports a negative stereotype about French people, thus does not express animosity. | 0.9 | false | French | null | The statement addresses stereotypes about the French being 'filthy, smelly, and lazy' but rejects those stereotypes. It does not explicitly compare the group to a non-human entity, thus not meeting the criteria for dehumanization. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text does not contain a threat or advocacy for harm towards any group. Instead, it counters derogatory statements about the French, indicating disbelief or disagreement with the negative stereotypes mentioned. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The statement refutes a stereotype about French people, indicating disagreement with any derogatory or hateful view towards them. | 0.95 |
39 | acl10031 | 39 | My beautiful whore friends: i love you all | nothate | none | none | original | test | 1 | LqLKTtrOmx | 1 | null | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not target a specific identity group with explicit negativity or derogatory language. Although the term "whore" can be derogatory, in this context it seems to be used affectionately and not to demean a group of people based on... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not convey implicit or explicit animosity towards any specific group. It expresses affection rather than hostility, despite potentially inappropriate language.', 'confidence': 0.9} | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'whore friends', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains derogatory language, using the term 'whore,' which is a derogatory insult, but there is no explicit comparison to a non-human entity. Therefore, it is classified as derogation rather than dehumanization.", '... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text does not contain any intent or incitement to harm any group. It mentions 'whore friends' in a possibly derogatory way, but there's no evidence of threat or harm outlined in the message.", 'confidence': 1.0} | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not mention any hate organization, event, act, individual, or trope that is universally recognized as hateful. It uses derogatory language but does not support or glorify a known hateful entity.', 'confidence': 0.9} | false | null | null | The text does not target a specific identity group with explicit negativity or derogatory language. Although the term "whore" can be derogatory, in this context it seems to be used affectionately and not to demean a group of people based on a protected characteristic. Therefore, it does not meet the | 0.6 | false | null | null | The text does not convey implicit or explicit animosity towards any specific group. It expresses affection rather than hostility, despite potentially inappropriate language. | 0.9 | false | whore friends | null | The text contains derogatory language, using the term 'whore,' which is a derogatory insult, but there is no explicit comparison to a non-human entity. Therefore, it is classified as derogation rather than dehumanization. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text does not contain any intent or incitement to harm any group. It mentions 'whore friends' in a possibly derogatory way, but there's no evidence of threat or harm outlined in the message. | 1 | false | null | null | The text does not mention any hate organization, event, act, individual, or trope that is universally recognized as hateful. It uses derogatory language but does not support or glorify a known hateful entity. | 0.9 |
45 | acl10037 | 45 | this tv presenter is shit | nothate | none | none | original | test | 1 | oemYWm1Tjg | 1 | null | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The statement targets an individual (a TV presenter) rather than a group or specific identity, which does not meet the criteria for group-level derogation outlined in the guidelines.', 'confidence': 0.9} | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The statement is a direct negative evaluation of an individual ('this tv presenter is shit') rather than a group or identity, thus it lacks a group target and implicit hostility elements.", 'confidence': 0.9} | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text uses a general insult 'shit' directed at an individual, which is derogatory but not dehumanizing. There is no explicit comparison to a non-human entity, so it does not meet the criteria for dehumanization.", 'confidence': 1.0} | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains derogatory language towards a TV presenter, indicating dislike or disrespect. However, it lacks any actionable intent, identifiable harm, or group targeting. It does not fit the definition of threatening as it merely expr... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The statement expresses a negative opinion about a TV presenter but does not glorify or support any hateful entity.', 'confidence': 0.9} | false | null | null | The statement targets an individual (a TV presenter) rather than a group or specific identity, which does not meet the criteria for group-level derogation outlined in the guidelines. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The statement is a direct negative evaluation of an individual ('this tv presenter is shit') rather than a group or identity, thus it lacks a group target and implicit hostility elements. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text uses a general insult 'shit' directed at an individual, which is derogatory but not dehumanizing. There is no explicit comparison to a non-human entity, so it does not meet the criteria for dehumanization. | 1 | false | null | null | The text contains derogatory language towards a TV presenter, indicating dislike or disrespect. However, it lacks any actionable intent, identifiable harm, or group targeting. It does not fit the definition of threatening as it merely expresses a negative opinion about an individual's work without a | 1 | false | null | null | The statement expresses a negative opinion about a TV presenter but does not glorify or support any hateful entity. | 0.9 |
10,176 | acl19156 | 10,176 | feminists? They are some of the most annoying people in our society | nothate | none | none | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl19865 | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'feminists', 'main_type': 'expressing_intensely_negative_emotions_like_hate_or_dislike', 'justification': "The text explicitly demeans 'feminists' by labeling them as 'some of the most annoying people in our society'. It expresses strong negative emotion aimed at the group, which f... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'feminists', 'main_type': 'implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group', 'justification': 'The statement implies a negative view toward feminists, where annoyance attributed to the group implies ridicule and denunciation, conveyed without direct insults, meeting Anim... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'Feminists', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text describes feminists as 'annoying,' which is a derogatory statement but does not involve a non-human comparison or metaphor. It lacks an explicit dehumanizing metaphor or description, making it an instance of a general in... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'feminists', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text expresses a negative opinion about feminists by calling them 'annoying' but does not express a desire or incitement to inflict harm. It lacks an actionable verb or intent indicating harm.", 'confidence': 0.9} | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses a negative opinion about feminists, but it does not glorify or support any hate entity. It does not meet the criteria for supporting a hate organization, individual, or trope.', 'confidence': 0.9} | true | feminists | expressing_intensely_negative_emotions_like_hate_or_dislike | The text explicitly demeans 'feminists' by labeling them as 'some of the most annoying people in our society'. It expresses strong negative emotion aimed at the group, which fits the specific definition of Derogation concerning explicit negativity toward an identity group. | 0.95 | true | feminists | implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group | The statement implies a negative view toward feminists, where annoyance attributed to the group implies ridicule and denunciation, conveyed without direct insults, meeting Animosity criteria. | 0.9 | false | Feminists | null | The text describes feminists as 'annoying,' which is a derogatory statement but does not involve a non-human comparison or metaphor. It lacks an explicit dehumanizing metaphor or description, making it an instance of a general insult rather than dehumanization. | 0.9 | false | feminists | null | The text expresses a negative opinion about feminists by calling them 'annoying' but does not express a desire or incitement to inflict harm. It lacks an actionable verb or intent indicating harm. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text expresses a negative opinion about feminists, but it does not glorify or support any hate entity. It does not meet the criteria for supporting a hate organization, individual, or trope. | 0.9 |
10,177 | acl19157 | 10,177 | James you are so odious please leave me alone | nothate | none | none | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl11222 | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text targets an individual, not a group, therefore, it does not meet the guidelines for Derogation, which require explicit negativity towards a group or identity. The use of \'odious\' applies to "James," who is likely an individual, no... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The statement directly addresses an individual (James) with the explicit negative adjective 'odious', indicating personal derogation rather than group-level animosity.", 'confidence': 0.9} | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text is a personal insult directed at an individual, 'James', using the term 'odious' which means repulsive. It does not utilize non-human comparisons or metaphors and is not directed at a group. Therefore, it does not meet the crit... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses a personal sentiment towards an individual (James) without referencing an identifiable group or expressing an intent to inflict harm. It does not meet the criteria for a threatening statement as defined by the guidelines... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses a personal dislike towards an individual named James but does not mention or endorse any hateful entity or glorify any hateful act, event, organization, or figure.', 'confidence': 1.0} | false | null | null | The text targets an individual, not a group, therefore, it does not meet the guidelines for Derogation, which require explicit negativity towards a group or identity. The use of 'odious' applies to "James," who is likely an individual, not a group. | 0.95 | false | null | null | The statement directly addresses an individual (James) with the explicit negative adjective 'odious', indicating personal derogation rather than group-level animosity. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text is a personal insult directed at an individual, 'James', using the term 'odious' which means repulsive. It does not utilize non-human comparisons or metaphors and is not directed at a group. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for dehumanization. | 1 | false | null | null | The text expresses a personal sentiment towards an individual (James) without referencing an identifiable group or expressing an intent to inflict harm. It does not meet the criteria for a threatening statement as defined by the guidelines. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text expresses a personal dislike towards an individual named James but does not mention or endorse any hateful entity or glorify any hateful act, event, organization, or figure. | 1 |
10,178 | acl19158 | 10,178 | fags stink almost as much as cigars | nothate | none | none | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl11240 | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'LGBTQ people', 'main_type': 'hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context', 'justification': "Explicit derogatory language is used with the slur 'fags' aimed at the LGBTQ group, paired with the insulting comparison language 'stink'. This fulfills the criteria... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The statement contains an explicit derogatory term, making it a case of explicit derogation rather than animosity, which should involve subtle or implicit hostility.', 'confidence': 0.9} | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'LGBTQ+', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains a derogatory statement using the slur 'fags' which is offensive to the LGBTQ+ community. However, it does not make an explicit non-human comparison or metaphor equating the target group to non-human entities. This ... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'LGBTQ+', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains derogatory language towards the LGBTQ+ community by using a slur, but it does not contain any action, intent, or incitement to cause harm. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for being classified as threatening.'... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The comment uses derogatory language against a marginalized group but does not explicitly glorify, justify, or support a known hate entity.', 'confidence': 0.8} | true | LGBTQ people | hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context | Explicit derogatory language is used with the slur 'fags' aimed at the LGBTQ group, paired with the insulting comparison language 'stink'. This fulfills the criteria for derogation against a protected group through the use of explicit slurs and negative representation. | 0.99 | false | null | null | The statement contains an explicit derogatory term, making it a case of explicit derogation rather than animosity, which should involve subtle or implicit hostility. | 0.9 | false | LGBTQ+ | null | The text contains a derogatory statement using the slur 'fags' which is offensive to the LGBTQ+ community. However, it does not make an explicit non-human comparison or metaphor equating the target group to non-human entities. This falls under Derogation rather than Dehumanization. | 0.9 | false | LGBTQ+ | null | The text contains derogatory language towards the LGBTQ+ community by using a slur, but it does not contain any action, intent, or incitement to cause harm. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for being classified as threatening. | 0.85 | false | null | null | The comment uses derogatory language against a marginalized group but does not explicitly glorify, justify, or support a known hate entity. | 0.8 |
10,179 | acl19159 | 10,179 | dishonesty runs rife within republicans | nothate | none | none | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl11331 | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'republicans', 'main_type': 'absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults', 'justification': "The text explicitly states that 'dishonesty runs rife within republicans', which constitutes an absolute negative characterization of the group, fitting the definition of... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': 'republicans', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The statement makes a direct accusation that 'dishonesty runs rife' within Republicans. This is an explicit negative predicate directly applied to the group, which aligns more with direct derogation rather than animosity as defined ... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'Republicans', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The statement 'dishonesty runs rife within republicans' attributes a negative human characteristic (dishonesty) to Republicans but does not equate them to non-human entities. Therefore, it falls under general derogation, not de... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Republicans', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text accuses Republicans of dishonesty but does not express any intent or incitement to inflict harm. There is no actionable verb, nor is there a call to harm the group, so it does not meet the criteria for a threatening state... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text makes a general negative statement about the Republican party but does not glorify, justify, or support any unambiguously hateful entities or ideologies.', 'confidence': 0.9} | true | republicans | absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults | The text explicitly states that 'dishonesty runs rife within republicans', which constitutes an absolute negative characterization of the group, fitting the definition of Derogation by using a negative stereotype. | 0.95 | false | republicans | null | The statement makes a direct accusation that 'dishonesty runs rife' within Republicans. This is an explicit negative predicate directly applied to the group, which aligns more with direct derogation rather than animosity as defined by indirect hostility criteria. | 0.95 | false | Republicans | null | The statement 'dishonesty runs rife within republicans' attributes a negative human characteristic (dishonesty) to Republicans but does not equate them to non-human entities. Therefore, it falls under general derogation, not dehumanization. | 0.95 | false | Republicans | null | The text accuses Republicans of dishonesty but does not express any intent or incitement to inflict harm. There is no actionable verb, nor is there a call to harm the group, so it does not meet the criteria for a threatening statement. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text makes a general negative statement about the Republican party but does not glorify, justify, or support any unambiguously hateful entities or ideologies. | 0.9 |
10,181 | acl19160 | 10,181 | It makes me so happy to see naughty kids sent home | nothate | none | none | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl11449 | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text does not explicitly target a group with a protected characteristic. It expresses a sentiment towards 'naughty kids,' which does not qualify as an identity group or a protected characteristic under the DynaHate guidelines.", 'confid... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text expresses happiness at the disciplinary action of 'naughty kids,' but 'naughty kids' is not a specific group identity. The statement lacks hostility targeted towards a defined group as per guidelines, thus it is not classified as An... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'naughty kids', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The statement expresses a personal sentiment about kids being disciplined but does not contain any language that explicitly compares the group to non-human entities. There is no dehumanization involved.', 'confidence': 0.95} | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Kids', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text expresses a sentiment about children ('naughty kids') being sent home, which does not meet the criteria for a threat. It does not involve actions or verbs that suggest harm, nor does it incite or endorse harmful actions against ... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not mention or support any hate entity or ideology. It expresses a sentiment about children being disciplined, which does not qualify as embracing or glorifying a hate entity.', 'confidence': 0.9} | false | null | null | The text does not explicitly target a group with a protected characteristic. It expresses a sentiment towards 'naughty kids,' which does not qualify as an identity group or a protected characteristic under the DynaHate guidelines. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text expresses happiness at the disciplinary action of 'naughty kids,' but 'naughty kids' is not a specific group identity. The statement lacks hostility targeted towards a defined group as per guidelines, thus it is not classified as Animosity. | 0.85 | false | naughty kids | null | The statement expresses a personal sentiment about kids being disciplined but does not contain any language that explicitly compares the group to non-human entities. There is no dehumanization involved. | 0.95 | false | Kids | null | The text expresses a sentiment about children ('naughty kids') being sent home, which does not meet the criteria for a threat. It does not involve actions or verbs that suggest harm, nor does it incite or endorse harmful actions against a group. It appears to express a personal opinion or happiness, | 0.8 | false | null | null | The text does not mention or support any hate entity or ideology. It expresses a sentiment about children being disciplined, which does not qualify as embracing or glorifying a hate entity. | 0.9 |
10,182 | acl19161 | 10,182 | Brexit was the right decision, but dont send them all home | nothate | none | none | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl11450 | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The statement does not explicitly demean, insult, or portray any specific group in strong negative terms. There is no direct negative predicate or adjective attached to any group, nor explicit negativity manifest in the text towards an iden... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'immigrants', 'main_type': 'implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group', 'justification': "The phrase 'don't send them all home' implies an underlying negative sentiment towards the immigrant group, suggesting they are not entirely welcome or should be partly remove... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not use a non-human comparison or metaphor to describe a group. It expresses a political opinion without explicit dehumanization of any specific group. There is no language equating a group to non-human entities.', 'confid... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses a political opinion about Brexit being the right decision and cautions against the immediate action of sending a group home. It lacks the action or incitement to harm that would categorize it as threatening according to ... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text discusses Brexit and expresses support for it as a decision but does not promote any hate-related entities or ideologies. There is no explicit glorification or support of a recognized hateful entity.', 'confidence': 0.9} | false | null | null | The statement does not explicitly demean, insult, or portray any specific group in strong negative terms. There is no direct negative predicate or adjective attached to any group, nor explicit negativity manifest in the text towards an identity group. Thus, it does not meet the criteria for derogate | 0.85 | true | immigrants | implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group | The phrase 'don't send them all home' implies an underlying negative sentiment towards the immigrant group, suggesting they are not entirely welcome or should be partly removed. It reflects an exclusionary view without using explicit slurs or threats, fitting the criteria for animosity. | 0.85 | false | null | null | The text does not use a non-human comparison or metaphor to describe a group. It expresses a political opinion without explicit dehumanization of any specific group. There is no language equating a group to non-human entities. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text expresses a political opinion about Brexit being the right decision and cautions against the immediate action of sending a group home. It lacks the action or incitement to harm that would categorize it as threatening according to the defined criteria. | 0.7 | false | null | null | The text discusses Brexit and expresses support for it as a decision but does not promote any hate-related entities or ideologies. There is no explicit glorification or support of a recognized hateful entity. | 0.9 |
10,183 | acl19162 | 10,183 | I'm donna make you, jew, walk through the fucking window! | hate | threatening | jew | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl20355 | false | false | false | false | false | true | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Jew', 'main_type': 'hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context', 'justification': "The text explicitly uses a slur with reference to 'jew', coupled with a threatening context ('walk through the fucking window'), which constitutes a hateful expression agains... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': 'jew', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains a threatening statement and a direct reference to a group with potential hostility towards Jews. However, the primary characteristic of the text is the threat of violence ('walk through the fucking window'), which falls ou... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'Jew', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains a derogatory and violent threat towards a person of Jewish background, using the slur 'jew' in a hostile manner. However, there is no explicit non-human comparison used in this text to qualify it as dehumanization und... | {'threatening': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Jews', 'main_type': 'physical_violence', 'justification': "The text 'make you, jew, walk through the fucking window' implies a severe physical threat directed at Jews, using aggressive language that suggests intent to cause bodily harm. The context is violent, targeting a specifi... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains violent and derogative language towards a Jewish person, but it does not explicitly glorify, justify, or support a universally recognized hateful entity. The focus is on insult and threat rather than support for a hate entit... | true | Jew | hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context | The text explicitly uses a slur with reference to 'jew', coupled with a threatening context ('walk through the fucking window'), which constitutes a hateful expression against the targeted group. | 0.97 | false | jew | null | The text contains a threatening statement and a direct reference to a group with potential hostility towards Jews. However, the primary characteristic of the text is the threat of violence ('walk through the fucking window'), which falls outside the Animosity category based on the guidelines. This, | 0.95 | false | Jew | null | The text contains a derogatory and violent threat towards a person of Jewish background, using the slur 'jew' in a hostile manner. However, there is no explicit non-human comparison used in this text to qualify it as dehumanization under the given definition. The text lacks any language equating the | 0.8 | true | Jews | physical_violence | The text 'make you, jew, walk through the fucking window' implies a severe physical threat directed at Jews, using aggressive language that suggests intent to cause bodily harm. The context is violent, targeting a specific group identity with a threat of physical violence. | 1 | false | null | null | The text contains violent and derogative language towards a Jewish person, but it does not explicitly glorify, justify, or support a universally recognized hateful entity. The focus is on insult and threat rather than support for a hate entity. | 0.9 |
10,184 | acl19163 | 10,184 | I thought it was common knowledge that all races fucking equal, whites are not superior, you nazi fucks | nothate | none | none | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl11548 | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses opposition to racist ideologies, asserting equality among races and directly refuting claims of racial superiority. There is no explicit derogation or negative portrayal of an entire identity group as per the provided gui... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not convey animosity towards a specific group. It criticizes the notion of racial superiority and targets neo-Nazi ideology, not any particular racial group.', 'confidence': 0.9} | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not contain any explicit non-human comparisons or metaphors aimed at a group. It is more of a strong, hostile statement against a perceived ideology, using offensive language without dehumanizing through comparison to non-... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses a denial or rejection of racial superiority, specifically rejecting the notion of white superiority, and uses derogatory language against those supporting racist ideologies. However, it does not include an actionable ver... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': 'nazi', 'main_type': 'hate_trope/symbol', 'justification': 'The text explicitly condemns the notion of racial superiority and criticizes Nazis, showing no support for hate entities.', 'confidence': 1.0} | false | null | null | The text expresses opposition to racist ideologies, asserting equality among races and directly refuting claims of racial superiority. There is no explicit derogation or negative portrayal of an entire identity group as per the provided guidelines. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text does not convey animosity towards a specific group. It criticizes the notion of racial superiority and targets neo-Nazi ideology, not any particular racial group. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text does not contain any explicit non-human comparisons or metaphors aimed at a group. It is more of a strong, hostile statement against a perceived ideology, using offensive language without dehumanizing through comparison to non-human entities. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text expresses a denial or rejection of racial superiority, specifically rejecting the notion of white superiority, and uses derogatory language against those supporting racist ideologies. However, it does not include an actionable verb or incitement to harm a group. | 0.9 | false | nazi | hate_trope/symbol | The text explicitly condemns the notion of racial superiority and criticizes Nazis, showing no support for hate entities. | 1 |
10,185 | acl19164 | 10,185 | My neighbour is looking at me like 'try and denounce me again you little bitch', so sick of these illegal immigrants! | hate | animosity | immig | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl19907 | true | false | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'illegal immigrants', 'main_type': 'expressing_intensely_negative_emotions_like_hate_or_dislike', 'justification': "The text explicitly expresses a negative emotion towards 'illegal immigrants', using a derogatory term to describe them. This fulfils the criteria of Derogation due t... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'illegal immigrants', 'main_type': 'implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group', 'justification': "The text expresses frustration and hostility towards the group labeled as 'illegal immigrants', using derogatory language and framing them in a negative light without ... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'immigrants', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text expresses frustration and hostility towards 'illegal immigrants' and uses the derogatory term 'bitch'. However, there is no explicit non-human comparison or metaphor that equates the target group to non-human entities. ... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'illegal immigrants', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses frustration and derogatory sentiment towards illegal immigrants but does not contain a direct or implied call to action, incitement, or intent to harm them. The use of "little bitch" denotes insult rather... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text expresses animosity towards 'illegal immigrants' but does not explicitly glorify or support a known hateful entity or ideology. It does not meet the strict criteria for Support since it lacks the endorsement of any unambiguously hate... | true | illegal immigrants | expressing_intensely_negative_emotions_like_hate_or_dislike | The text explicitly expresses a negative emotion towards 'illegal immigrants', using a derogatory term to describe them. This fulfils the criteria of Derogation due to the explicit negativity and targeting of a specific group based on their immigration status. | 0.95 | true | illegal immigrants | implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group | The text expresses frustration and hostility towards the group labeled as 'illegal immigrants', using derogatory language and framing them in a negative light without direct insults or threats. | 0.9 | false | immigrants | null | The text expresses frustration and hostility towards 'illegal immigrants' and uses the derogatory term 'bitch'. However, there is no explicit non-human comparison or metaphor that equates the target group to non-human entities. The language used is derogatory but does not fit the strict criteria for | 0.9 | false | illegal immigrants | null | The text expresses frustration and derogatory sentiment towards illegal immigrants but does not contain a direct or implied call to action, incitement, or intent to harm them. The use of "little bitch" denotes insult rather than a threat, and there is no identifiable actionable threat towards a prov | 0.75 | false | null | null | The text expresses animosity towards 'illegal immigrants' but does not explicitly glorify or support a known hateful entity or ideology. It does not meet the strict criteria for Support since it lacks the endorsement of any unambiguously hateful organization, event, act, or individual. | 0.8 |
10,186 | acl19165 | 10,186 | I don't think I've met a kind bisexual person in my life! It's impossible | hate | derogation | bis | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl11591 | false | false | true | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'bisexual people', 'main_type': 'absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults', 'justification': 'The text explicitly targets \'bisexual people\' and suggests a negative stereotype by implying that all individuals from this group lack kindness. The statement uses ... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'bisexual people', 'main_type': 'implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group', 'justification': 'The statement implies a broad negative sentiment towards bisexual people, suggesting they are inherently not kind. Although it lacks direct slurs or explicit insults, it ... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'bisexual people', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The statement makes a generalized negative assertion about bisexual people, stating they haven't met a 'kind' person from this group. However, it does not use non-human comparisons or language that equates bisexual people t... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'bisexual people', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses a negative generalization about bisexual people but does not contain any actionable verb or intent to harm. It does not meet the criteria for being threatening as there is no explicit or implicit encourageme... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not glorify, justify, or support any unambiguously hateful entity such as a hate group, event, or individual. It expresses a biased personal viewpoint about bisexual people but does not meet the criteria for supporting a hate en... | true | bisexual people | absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults | The text explicitly targets 'bisexual people' and suggests a negative stereotype by implying that all individuals from this group lack kindness. The statement uses an absolute phrase, "It's impossible," which reinforces this negative portrayal, fitting the definition of derogation. | 0.95 | true | bisexual people | implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group | The statement implies a broad negative sentiment towards bisexual people, suggesting they are inherently not kind. Although it lacks direct slurs or explicit insults, it conveys a prejudiced stereotype through a sweeping negative generalization. | 0.9 | false | bisexual people | null | The statement makes a generalized negative assertion about bisexual people, stating they haven't met a 'kind' person from this group. However, it does not use non-human comparisons or language that equates bisexual people to non-human entities. | 0.9 | false | bisexual people | null | The text expresses a negative generalization about bisexual people but does not contain any actionable verb or intent to harm. It does not meet the criteria for being threatening as there is no explicit or implicit encouragement to inflict harm. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text does not glorify, justify, or support any unambiguously hateful entity such as a hate group, event, or individual. It expresses a biased personal viewpoint about bisexual people but does not meet the criteria for supporting a hate entity. | 0.9 |
10,187 | acl19166 | 10,187 | Due to my interest in KPOP I have found myself gaining more East Asian friends, they usually cant understand english well but can keep up if you speak slowly | hate | animosity | asi.east | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl11634 | true | false | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not contain explicit derogatory language or negativity towards a particular group. It merely comments on the English language proficiency of East Asian friends without using negative adjectives or stereotypes. Thus, it does no... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': 'East Asians', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The statement does not express hostility or negative sentiment towards East Asians. It simply mentions an experience of making friends through a shared interest, with an observation on language fluency. No implicit or explicit denig... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'East Asian friends', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not involve any non-human comparison or metaphor. It comments on language proficiency rather than equating the group to non-human entities. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for dehumanization.', 'co... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not contain any intent or support for harm against any group. It is a personal anecdote expressing an interest in KPOP and the dynamics of communicating with East Asian friends, but lacks any threatening language or incitemen... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text does not mention any hateful entity, nor does it support or glorify any hateful actions, events, organizations, individuals, or tropes. It simply discusses the writer's interest in KPOP and interaction with East Asian friends.", 'con... | false | null | null | The text does not contain explicit derogatory language or negativity towards a particular group. It merely comments on the English language proficiency of East Asian friends without using negative adjectives or stereotypes. Thus, it does not meet the criteria for derogation. | 0.95 | false | East Asians | null | The statement does not express hostility or negative sentiment towards East Asians. It simply mentions an experience of making friends through a shared interest, with an observation on language fluency. No implicit or explicit denigration is present. | 0.95 | false | East Asian friends | null | The text does not involve any non-human comparison or metaphor. It comments on language proficiency rather than equating the group to non-human entities. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for dehumanization. | 1 | false | null | null | The text does not contain any intent or support for harm against any group. It is a personal anecdote expressing an interest in KPOP and the dynamics of communicating with East Asian friends, but lacks any threatening language or incitement to harm. | 1 | false | null | null | The text does not mention any hateful entity, nor does it support or glorify any hateful actions, events, organizations, individuals, or tropes. It simply discusses the writer's interest in KPOP and interaction with East Asian friends. | 1 |
10,188 | acl19167 | 10,188 | I called her a muncher! I wish you could have seen her face!! | nothate | none | none | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl11645 | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text does not specify a group or identity term that is targeted with derogatory language. 'Muncher' is used as an individual insult without a clear group association. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for Derogation against a gro... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The statement uses a pejorative term directly aimed at an individual, which aligns more closely with derogation rather than animosity based on the criteria provided. There is no implicit hostility towards a group; it is a direct insult.', 'c... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text uses a potentially derogatory term 'muncher,' but it does not explicitly compare the target to a non-human entity. Without a specific non-human comparison or more context, this remains in the realm of derogation rather than deh... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text involves name-calling and possibly an attempt at causing embarrassment, but it does not express any intent or incitement to inflict harm on a group. It lacks an actionable verb related to harm, and no group is targeted; the statem... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not mention or explicitly support any unambiguously hateful entity, nor does it glorify or legitimize hateful ideologies/events.', 'confidence': 0.9} | false | null | null | The text does not specify a group or identity term that is targeted with derogatory language. 'Muncher' is used as an individual insult without a clear group association. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for Derogation against a group. | 0.85 | false | null | null | The statement uses a pejorative term directly aimed at an individual, which aligns more closely with derogation rather than animosity based on the criteria provided. There is no implicit hostility towards a group; it is a direct insult. | 0.85 | false | null | null | The text uses a potentially derogatory term 'muncher,' but it does not explicitly compare the target to a non-human entity. Without a specific non-human comparison or more context, this remains in the realm of derogation rather than dehumanization. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text involves name-calling and possibly an attempt at causing embarrassment, but it does not express any intent or incitement to inflict harm on a group. It lacks an actionable verb related to harm, and no group is targeted; the statement appears to be directed at an individual. | 0.8 | false | null | null | The text does not mention or explicitly support any unambiguously hateful entity, nor does it glorify or legitimize hateful ideologies/events. | 0.9 |
10,189 | acl19168 | 10,189 | trans have no regrets | nothate | none | none | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl11664 | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': 'Trans', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not explicitly demean, insult, or vilify the group. It makes a statement about having no regrets, but does not portray the trans group in strong negative terms or ascribe negative characteristics or behaviors.', 'confidence... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'trans people', 'main_type': 'making_factual_or_pseudo-factual_statements_about_groups', 'justification': 'The statement serves as a blanket generalization about trans people, implying a false narrative without explicit evidence. It frames them collectively, which could support ster... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'trans', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The statement 'trans have no regrets' does not involve a non-human comparison or equate the group to non-human entities. It does not satisfy the criteria for dehumanization as it lacks explicit malicious comparison to non-human entit... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'trans', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text 'trans have no regrets' does not express any intent or incitement to harm a group. It lacks any actionable verbs or threats. Therefore, it is not considered threatening under the given taxonomy.", 'confidence': 0.85} | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text 'trans have no regrets' does not mention or glorify an unambiguously hateful entity. It does not support any known hate organization, event, act, individual, or trope.", 'confidence': 1.0} | false | Trans | null | The text does not explicitly demean, insult, or vilify the group. It makes a statement about having no regrets, but does not portray the trans group in strong negative terms or ascribe negative characteristics or behaviors. | 0.8 | true | trans people | making_factual_or_pseudo-factual_statements_about_groups | The statement serves as a blanket generalization about trans people, implying a false narrative without explicit evidence. It frames them collectively, which could support stereotypes or prejudicial views, and thus fits the criteria for implicit hostility or animosity. | 0.85 | false | trans | null | The statement 'trans have no regrets' does not involve a non-human comparison or equate the group to non-human entities. It does not satisfy the criteria for dehumanization as it lacks explicit malicious comparison to non-human entities. | 1 | false | trans | null | The text 'trans have no regrets' does not express any intent or incitement to harm a group. It lacks any actionable verbs or threats. Therefore, it is not considered threatening under the given taxonomy. | 0.85 | false | null | null | The text 'trans have no regrets' does not mention or glorify an unambiguously hateful entity. It does not support any known hate organization, event, act, individual, or trope. | 1 |
10,190 | acl19169 | 10,190 | I've had it with my wife all she was useful for is bringing my children into this world and little else. | nothate | none | none | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl11670 | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text does not explicitly target a group or identity. The statement is negative but directed towards an individual (wife), not a group, hence it doesn't meet the criteria for Derogation.", 'confidence': 0.95} | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'women', 'main_type': 'attacking_a_specific_trait_of_a_group', 'justification': "The text reduces women, specifically the speaker's wife, to a single role of childbirth, which is a form of role reduction and objectification. It dismisses any other contributions or capabilities of wo... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'wife', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not employ any explicit non-human entity comparison or metaphor to dehumanize the target group. It conveys objectification and derogation by indicating her worth is limited to a singular function, but it does not strip t... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'My wife', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The statement does not include an actionable threat or intent to cause harm. It reflects dissatisfaction and possibly derogation but lacks a call to action or incitement of harm.', 'confidence': 0.7} | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses derogatory sentiments about a spouse but does not glorify or support any hateful entities or actions. It does not meet the criteria for support of hate groups or individuals.', 'confidence': 0.9} | false | null | null | The text does not explicitly target a group or identity. The statement is negative but directed towards an individual (wife), not a group, hence it doesn't meet the criteria for Derogation. | 0.95 | true | women | attacking_a_specific_trait_of_a_group | The text reduces women, specifically the speaker's wife, to a single role of childbirth, which is a form of role reduction and objectification. It dismisses any other contributions or capabilities of women beyond this trait, implying a negative view towards them without using explicit slurs or derog | 0.95 | false | wife | null | The text does not employ any explicit non-human entity comparison or metaphor to dehumanize the target group. It conveys objectification and derogation by indicating her worth is limited to a singular function, but it does not strip the human status or equate a non-human comparison. | 0.8 | false | My wife | null | The statement does not include an actionable threat or intent to cause harm. It reflects dissatisfaction and possibly derogation but lacks a call to action or incitement of harm. | 0.7 | false | null | null | The text expresses derogatory sentiments about a spouse but does not glorify or support any hateful entities or actions. It does not meet the criteria for support of hate groups or individuals. | 0.9 |
10,192 | acl19170 | 10,192 | Trans people are worthy of respect | nothate | none | none | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl11740 | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': 'Trans people', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text does not contain any explicit negativity, insults, or derogatory language towards the group ('Trans people'). Instead, it affirms their worthiness of respect.", 'confidence': 0.95} | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The statement expresses a positive sentiment towards a group by affirming their worthiness of respect. There is no hostility or implication of negative sentiment.', 'confidence': 0.95} | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'Trans people', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not contain any non-human comparison or metaphor for the target group. Instead, it affirms the worthiness of respect for trans people, without dehumanizing language.', 'confidence': 1.0} | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Trans people', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text is affirming respect towards the identified group (Trans people) and does not express any intent or incitement to harm. It is supportive and not threatening.', 'confidence': 1.0} | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not mention or endorse any hate entity. It expresses a supportive sentiment towards transgender individuals, which does not align with the definition of supporting hateful entities.', 'confidence': 1.0} | false | Trans people | null | The text does not contain any explicit negativity, insults, or derogatory language towards the group ('Trans people'). Instead, it affirms their worthiness of respect. | 0.95 | false | null | null | The statement expresses a positive sentiment towards a group by affirming their worthiness of respect. There is no hostility or implication of negative sentiment. | 0.95 | false | Trans people | null | The text does not contain any non-human comparison or metaphor for the target group. Instead, it affirms the worthiness of respect for trans people, without dehumanizing language. | 1 | false | Trans people | null | The text is affirming respect towards the identified group (Trans people) and does not express any intent or incitement to harm. It is supportive and not threatening. | 1 | false | null | null | The text does not mention or endorse any hate entity. It expresses a supportive sentiment towards transgender individuals, which does not align with the definition of supporting hateful entities. | 1 |
10,193 | acl19171 | 10,193 | Honestly, all that boomers deserve is to be beaten up | nothate | none | none | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl11743 | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': 'boomers', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text suggests a violent action against 'boomers', which falls under the category of threatening or endorsing harm rather than derogation. The focus is on advocating violence rather than explicit derogatory language about the group'... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'boomers', 'main_type': 'implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group', 'justification': "The text expresses hostility towards 'boomers,' suggesting they deserve violence. While it implies negative views about the group, it stops short of using direct slurs or insults... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'boomers', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains a harmful statement directed at 'boomers', but it does not compare them to non-human entities. The statement suggests harm, which is concerning, but it doesn't fulfill the criteria for dehumanization as there is n... | {'threatening': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Boomers', 'main_type': 'physical_violence', 'justification': "The text expresses a desire for physical harm against a specific group ('boomers'). The use of the phrase 'deserve to be beaten up' implies intent and support for inflicting physical violence on the group.", 'confidenc... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text expresses animosity towards a demographic group but does not glorify or support a known hate entity or action fitting strict criteria for 'support.' It is derogatory rather than supportive of a specific hate ideology.", 'confidence':... | false | boomers | null | The text suggests a violent action against 'boomers', which falls under the category of threatening or endorsing harm rather than derogation. The focus is on advocating violence rather than explicit derogatory language about the group's characteristics or behaviors. | 0.9 | true | boomers | implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group | The text expresses hostility towards 'boomers,' suggesting they deserve violence. While it implies negative views about the group, it stops short of using direct slurs or insults. | 0.8 | false | boomers | null | The text contains a harmful statement directed at 'boomers', but it does not compare them to non-human entities. The statement suggests harm, which is concerning, but it doesn't fulfill the criteria for dehumanization as there is no explicit non-human comparison. | 0.9 | true | Boomers | physical_violence | The text expresses a desire for physical harm against a specific group ('boomers'). The use of the phrase 'deserve to be beaten up' implies intent and support for inflicting physical violence on the group. | 1 | false | null | null | The text expresses animosity towards a demographic group but does not glorify or support a known hate entity or action fitting strict criteria for 'support.' It is derogatory rather than supportive of a specific hate ideology. | 0.8 |
10,194 | acl19172 | 10,194 | If BLM and all those bellends continue devastating our streets we will be in Africa by next week. | hate | derogation | bla | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl20497 | false | false | true | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'BLM', 'main_type': 'portraying_group_as_having_negative_impact_on_society', 'justification': "The text explicitly targets BLM (Black Lives Matter) and refers to them using the derogatory term 'bellends'. Additionally, it portrays the group as having a destructive impact on society... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'BLM supporters', 'main_type': 'implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group', 'justification': 'The text implies hostility towards the BLM (Black Lives Matter) supporters by associating them with devastation and making a prejudicial reference to African origins. It u... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'BLM supporters', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The statement does not include an explicit non-human comparison. While it implies a negative stereotype casting BLM supporters as destructive, it does not explicitly compare them to non-human entities such as pests or vermin... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'BLM supporters', 'main_type': 'other', 'justification': "The text does not explicitly incite or express intent for harm towards a group. Instead, it uses derogatory language ('bellends') and implies a hypothetical scenario of displacement ('we will be in Africa'). However, it lack... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses animosity and derogation towards BLM but does not explicitly glorify or support any recognized hate entities.', 'confidence': 0.8} | true | BLM | portraying_group_as_having_negative_impact_on_society | The text explicitly targets BLM (Black Lives Matter) and refers to them using the derogatory term 'bellends'. Additionally, it portrays the group as having a destructive impact on society ('devastating our streets'). This constitutes derogation through explicit negative representation, adhering to D | 0.95 | true | BLM supporters | implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group | The text implies hostility towards the BLM (Black Lives Matter) supporters by associating them with devastation and making a prejudicial reference to African origins. It uses innuendo and coded language suggesting that their actions are negative and undesirable without using direct insults. | 0.95 | false | BLM supporters | null | The statement does not include an explicit non-human comparison. While it implies a negative stereotype casting BLM supporters as destructive, it does not explicitly compare them to non-human entities such as pests or vermin. | 0.8 | false | BLM supporters | other | The text does not explicitly incite or express intent for harm towards a group. Instead, it uses derogatory language ('bellends') and implies a hypothetical scenario of displacement ('we will be in Africa'). However, it lacks a call to action or clear expression of intent to commit harm, so it does | 0.75 | false | null | null | The text expresses animosity and derogation towards BLM but does not explicitly glorify or support any recognized hate entities. | 0.8 |
10,195 | acl19173 | 10,195 | bakchods are such tossers | hate | derogation | notargetrecorded | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl20234 | false | false | true | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'bakchods', 'main_type': 'hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context', 'justification': "The statement uses a slang term 'bakchods' as the target group and 'tossers' as an insult, which constitutes a derogatory statement aimed at the group using explicit neg... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text uses derogatory language ('bakchods', 'tossers') to directly insult a group, suggesting this is an explicit derogation rather than animosity through implicit means.", 'confidence': 0.9} | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text uses derogatory terms 'bakchods' and 'tossers'. However, these are general insults and do not contain any non-human comparison or metaphor equating the target to a non-human entity. Thus, it does not meet the criteria for dehum... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text uses derogatory language towards a group labeled as 'bakchods,' but there is no actionable threat or incitement to harm. It is an expression of dislike without any indication of intent to harm.", 'confidence': 0.85} | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains derogatory language ('tossers') directed at 'bakchods', but it does not reference or glorify any hateful entity, event, or individual. Thus, it does not meet the criteria for supporting any unambiguously hateful entity.", 'c... | true | bakchods | hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context | The statement uses a slang term 'bakchods' as the target group and 'tossers' as an insult, which constitutes a derogatory statement aimed at the group using explicit negative language. | 0.95 | false | null | null | The text uses derogatory language ('bakchods', 'tossers') to directly insult a group, suggesting this is an explicit derogation rather than animosity through implicit means. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text uses derogatory terms 'bakchods' and 'tossers'. However, these are general insults and do not contain any non-human comparison or metaphor equating the target to a non-human entity. Thus, it does not meet the criteria for dehumanization. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text uses derogatory language towards a group labeled as 'bakchods,' but there is no actionable threat or incitement to harm. It is an expression of dislike without any indication of intent to harm. | 0.85 | false | null | null | The text contains derogatory language ('tossers') directed at 'bakchods', but it does not reference or glorify any hateful entity, event, or individual. Thus, it does not meet the criteria for supporting any unambiguously hateful entity. | 0.9 |
10,196 | acl19174 | 10,196 | Remember when a shit load of jews were caught by nazis?? Reap what you sow you bellends!!!! | hate | support | jew | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl11817 | false | false | false | false | true | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text appears to reference historical events in a way that could be interpreted as minimizing or mocking a historical atrocity, but without explicit manifest derogation towards a protected group.', 'confidence': 0.6} | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Jews', 'main_type': 'implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group', 'justification': 'The text references a historical atrocity with a celebratory tone, implying Jews deserved their fate, which is a hostile framing that denigrates the group.', 'confidence': 1.0} | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'Jews', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text is offensive and contains derogatory language, specifically celebrating violence against Jews, but it does not explicitly compare the group to non-human entities, which is required for a dehumanization judgment.', 'confidence... | {'threatening': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Jews', 'main_type': 'emotional/psychological_harm', 'justification': "The text refers to Jews being caught by Nazis, a historical reference to the Holocaust, and uses the phrase 'reap what you sow,' which implies that they deserved it. This supports or endorses emotional or psych... | {'support': 'Yes', 'target_entity': 'nazis', 'main_type': 'hate_organization', 'justification': 'The text refers to Jews being caught by Nazis in a derogatory manner, implying justification of Nazi actions which constitute a clear hate organization.', 'confidence': 0.95} | false | null | null | The text appears to reference historical events in a way that could be interpreted as minimizing or mocking a historical atrocity, but without explicit manifest derogation towards a protected group. | 0.6 | true | Jews | implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group | The text references a historical atrocity with a celebratory tone, implying Jews deserved their fate, which is a hostile framing that denigrates the group. | 1 | false | Jews | null | The text is offensive and contains derogatory language, specifically celebrating violence against Jews, but it does not explicitly compare the group to non-human entities, which is required for a dehumanization judgment. | 0.9 | true | Jews | emotional/psychological_harm | The text refers to Jews being caught by Nazis, a historical reference to the Holocaust, and uses the phrase 'reap what you sow,' which implies that they deserved it. This supports or endorses emotional or psychological harm against Jews by trivializing the historical atrocities against them. | 0.9 | true | nazis | hate_organization | The text refers to Jews being caught by Nazis in a derogatory manner, implying justification of Nazi actions which constitute a clear hate organization. | 0.95 |
10,197 | acl19175 | 10,197 | drugs make me unc0nf0rt4bl3 | nothate | none | none | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl20826 | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not contain any derogatory language targeting a group or identity. It expresses personal discomfort with drugs, but does not demean or insult a specific group.', 'confidence': 0.95} | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not target a specific group or identity; it expresses a personal discomfort with drugs in general.', 'confidence': 0.8} | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses a personal feeling of discomfort towards drugs but does not include any dehumanizing language or comparison to non-human entities targeting a group. It is not related to dehumanization.', 'confidence': 0.9} | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not express any intent or incitement to harm any group or individual. It merely expresses personal discomfort with drugs and lacks any actionable threat or targeting of a group that would classify it as threatening.', 'confid... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses a personal sentiment about drugs without indicating support or glorification of any hateful entity.', 'confidence': 1.0} | false | null | null | The text does not contain any derogatory language targeting a group or identity. It expresses personal discomfort with drugs, but does not demean or insult a specific group. | 0.95 | false | null | null | The text does not target a specific group or identity; it expresses a personal discomfort with drugs in general. | 0.8 | false | null | null | The text expresses a personal feeling of discomfort towards drugs but does not include any dehumanizing language or comparison to non-human entities targeting a group. It is not related to dehumanization. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text does not express any intent or incitement to harm any group or individual. It merely expresses personal discomfort with drugs and lacks any actionable threat or targeting of a group that would classify it as threatening. | 1 | false | null | null | The text expresses a personal sentiment about drugs without indicating support or glorification of any hateful entity. | 1 |
10,198 | acl19176 | 10,198 | im pretty sure my mum was thriled when I was not born a boy, they are totally useless | nothate | none | none | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl11893 | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'boys', 'main_type': 'absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults', 'justification': "The text makes an absolute negative statement by describing 'boys' as 'totally useless', which serves as an explicit stereotype and insult towards the group.", 'confidence': 0.9... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'boys', 'main_type': 'implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group', 'justification': "The text implies a negative view towards boys by suggesting they are 'totally useless', which indirectly undermines their value. While it does not use overt slurs, the framing and c... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'boys', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The statement describes boys as 'totally useless,' which is derogatory but does not equate them to non-human entities. Therefore, this does not meet the criteria for dehumanization. It lacks the explicitness and non-human comparison r... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'boys', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text shows a derogatory opinion towards boys, calling them 'totally useless,' but it does not express an intent or incitement to harm, nor does it identify a specific harmful action. There is no identified actionable threat against t... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not reference or support any unambiguously hateful entity, nor does it glorify or deny any specific hate event or action. Instead, it expresses an opinion about gender without promoting a known hate group or figure.', 'confidenc... | true | boys | absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults | The text makes an absolute negative statement by describing 'boys' as 'totally useless', which serves as an explicit stereotype and insult towards the group. | 0.95 | true | boys | implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group | The text implies a negative view towards boys by suggesting they are 'totally useless', which indirectly undermines their value. While it does not use overt slurs, the framing and context imply a derogatory sentiment. | 0.9 | false | boys | null | The statement describes boys as 'totally useless,' which is derogatory but does not equate them to non-human entities. Therefore, this does not meet the criteria for dehumanization. It lacks the explicitness and non-human comparison required for a classification of dehumanization. | 0.9 | false | boys | null | The text shows a derogatory opinion towards boys, calling them 'totally useless,' but it does not express an intent or incitement to harm, nor does it identify a specific harmful action. There is no identified actionable threat against the group. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text does not reference or support any unambiguously hateful entity, nor does it glorify or deny any specific hate event or action. Instead, it expresses an opinion about gender without promoting a known hate group or figure. | 0.9 |
10,199 | acl19177 | 10,199 | I'd love to see more of our streets free of immigrants | hate | animosity | ref | original | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2a | acl11950 | true | false | false | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'immigrants', 'main_type': 'incompatibility_thesis_claiming_group_cannot_integrate_culturally_or_naturally', 'justification': 'The text expresses a desire for public spaces to be free of immigrants, implying that they do not belong or cannot integrate. This fits with the derogation... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'immigrants', 'main_type': 'implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group', 'justification': 'The text implies a negative view about immigrants, suggesting the streets are better without them. This conveys hostility through desired exclusion without explicit slurs or v... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'Immigrants', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The statement expresses a desire for immigrants to be removed from the streets, which may suggest exclusion or derogation. However, it does not employ an explicit comparison to non-human entities, which is required to qualify as... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'immigrants', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses a desire for the absence of immigrants in a specific area but does not include an actionable threat, incitement, or intent to inflict harm. It lacks immediate or severe harm directed specifically at the group, th... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not explicitly glorify or support a known hateful entity. It expresses a sentiment against immigrants but does not support a specific hate organization, event, act, or individual.', 'confidence': 0.8} | true | immigrants | incompatibility_thesis_claiming_group_cannot_integrate_culturally_or_naturally | The text expresses a desire for public spaces to be free of immigrants, implying that they do not belong or cannot integrate. This fits with the derogation criterion of explicit negativity toward the group. | 0.9 | true | immigrants | implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group | The text implies a negative view about immigrants, suggesting the streets are better without them. This conveys hostility through desired exclusion without explicit slurs or violence. | 0.9 | false | Immigrants | null | The statement expresses a desire for immigrants to be removed from the streets, which may suggest exclusion or derogation. However, it does not employ an explicit comparison to non-human entities, which is required to qualify as dehumanization under the strict criteria provided. | 0.8 | false | immigrants | null | The text expresses a desire for the absence of immigrants in a specific area but does not include an actionable threat, incitement, or intent to inflict harm. It lacks immediate or severe harm directed specifically at the group, thus not meeting the criteria for a threatening judgment. | 0.8 | false | null | null | The text does not explicitly glorify or support a known hateful entity. It expresses a sentiment against immigrants but does not support a specific hate organization, event, act, or individual. | 0.8 |
10,200 | acl19178 | 10,200 | We all know that there is no supreme race | nothate | none | none | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl11957 | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text is making a statement against the concept of a 'supreme race.' It does not explicitly demean or insult any group, nor does it imply negativity towards any particular identity. Instead, it negates a supremacist idea, which does not ... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text states that there is no supreme race, which is a neutral or positive statement against racial superiority. It does not express hostility, imply negative views about a group, or employ innuendo or prejudicial framing. Therefore, it d... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not contain any non-human comparisons or explicitly dehumanizing language. It discusses the concept of racial supremacy but denies its existence without making comparisons to non-human entities.', 'confidence': 1.0} | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The statement declares an opinion that there is no supreme race, which is a non-threatening acknowledgment of equality among races. It does not express or endorse harm or call for action against any group.', 'confidence': 1.0} | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The statement rejects the idea of a 'supreme race', indicating a lack of support for racist ideologies. It does not glorify or support any hateful entity.", 'confidence': 0.95} | false | null | null | The text is making a statement against the concept of a 'supreme race.' It does not explicitly demean or insult any group, nor does it imply negativity towards any particular identity. Instead, it negates a supremacist idea, which does not meet the criteria for Derogation. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text states that there is no supreme race, which is a neutral or positive statement against racial superiority. It does not express hostility, imply negative views about a group, or employ innuendo or prejudicial framing. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for animosity. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text does not contain any non-human comparisons or explicitly dehumanizing language. It discusses the concept of racial supremacy but denies its existence without making comparisons to non-human entities. | 1 | false | null | null | The statement declares an opinion that there is no supreme race, which is a non-threatening acknowledgment of equality among races. It does not express or endorse harm or call for action against any group. | 1 | false | null | null | The statement rejects the idea of a 'supreme race', indicating a lack of support for racist ideologies. It does not glorify or support any hateful entity. | 0.95 |
10,201 | acl19179 | 10,201 | Violent men should be banished from our society | nothate | none | none | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl12000 | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The statement does not target a specific identity or protected group. It refers to 'violent men', which is a behavioral category rather than a social identity or protected characteristic. The statement does not involve a derogatory sentimen... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The statement refers to 'violent men,' which is a subgroup defined by behavior (violence), not an inherent group identity. The text calls for expulsion based on actions (violence), implying a direct negative characteristic associated with th... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'Violent men', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text refers to 'violent men' as a group that should be excluded from society, which is a statement expressing animosity or suggesting action against a certain behavior, but it does not equate them to non-human entities or u... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Men', 'main_type': 'political_exclusion', 'justification': "The text calls for the exclusion ('banished') of 'violent men' rather than expressing a desire or incitement for physical harm. While it addresses a group and proposes significant social exclusion, it lacks any immediate ... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The statement does not explicitly glorify or support any hate entity. It expresses a generalized opinion against violent men without specific endorsement of hateful actions, events, or individuals.', 'confidence': 1.0} | false | null | null | The statement does not target a specific identity or protected group. It refers to 'violent men', which is a behavioral category rather than a social identity or protected characteristic. The statement does not involve a derogatory sentiment towards a group based on identity. | 0.8 | false | null | null | The statement refers to 'violent men,' which is a subgroup defined by behavior (violence), not an inherent group identity. The text calls for expulsion based on actions (violence), implying a direct negative characteristic associated with those actions rather than an implicit or subtle hostile view. | 0.9 | false | Violent men | null | The text refers to 'violent men' as a group that should be excluded from society, which is a statement expressing animosity or suggesting action against a certain behavior, but it does not equate them to non-human entities or use language that strips them of human status based on dehumanization as a | 0.9 | false | Men | political_exclusion | The text calls for the exclusion ('banished') of 'violent men' rather than expressing a desire or incitement for physical harm. While it addresses a group and proposes significant social exclusion, it lacks any immediate call for violence or severe harm against their physical safety, thus not classf | 0.8 | false | null | null | The statement does not explicitly glorify or support any hate entity. It expresses a generalized opinion against violent men without specific endorsement of hateful actions, events, or individuals. | 1 |
10,203 | acl19180 | 10,203 | If you think smart, you'll know that being gay is not natural | hate | derogation | gay | original | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2a | acl12001 | false | false | true | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'gay people', 'main_type': 'incompatibility_thesis_claiming_group_cannot_integrate_culturally_or_naturally', 'justification': "The text explicitly states that 'being gay is not natural', which suggests that it is incompatible with nature or normal human existence. This constitutes ... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'gay people', 'main_type': 'making_factual_or_pseudo-factual_statements_about_groups', 'justification': "The text implicitly suggests a negative view of gay people by framing being gay as 'unnatural.' This uses a pseudo-factual statement to cast aspersions on the group’s identity, s... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'gay people', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The statement labels being gay as 'not natural', but it does not equate gay people to non-human entities or use a metaphor that strips them of human status. It falls under derogation rather than dehumanization, as it implies a j... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'LGBTQ+', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text expresses an opinion about the nature of being gay, which may be derogatory or exclusionary, but does not include an intention or incitement to cause harm to a group. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for 'threatening' ... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text expresses a derogatory opinion about being gay, suggesting it is 'not natural'. However, it does not support or glorify any recognized hateful entity or engage in denial of known atrocities. It does not fit the criteria for support o... | true | gay people | incompatibility_thesis_claiming_group_cannot_integrate_culturally_or_naturally | The text explicitly states that 'being gay is not natural', which suggests that it is incompatible with nature or normal human existence. This constitutes derogation by asserting a form of inferiority or wrongness associated with the group. | 0.95 | true | gay people | making_factual_or_pseudo-factual_statements_about_groups | The text implicitly suggests a negative view of gay people by framing being gay as 'unnatural.' This uses a pseudo-factual statement to cast aspersions on the group’s identity, suggesting a deviation from what is 'natural' without overt slurs or threats. | 0.9 | false | gay people | null | The statement labels being gay as 'not natural', but it does not equate gay people to non-human entities or use a metaphor that strips them of human status. It falls under derogation rather than dehumanization, as it implies a judgment on naturalness but not a dehumanizing metaphor or comparison. | 0.9 | false | LGBTQ+ | null | The text expresses an opinion about the nature of being gay, which may be derogatory or exclusionary, but does not include an intention or incitement to cause harm to a group. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for 'threatening' as it lacks a call to action or identifiable harm. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text expresses a derogatory opinion about being gay, suggesting it is 'not natural'. However, it does not support or glorify any recognized hateful entity or engage in denial of known atrocities. It does not fit the criteria for support of a hate entity. | 0.9 |
10,204 | acl19181 | 10,204 | I love it how gays think they are normal!. It's like some big joke they just arent even aware of haha | hate | derogation | gay | original | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2a | acl12023 | false | false | true | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'gays', 'main_type': 'portraying_group_as_evil_or_wrong_through_negative_representations', 'justification': "The text mocks and belittles gays by implying that their self-perception as 'normal' is laughable and akin to a 'big joke.' This constitutes an explicit negative representat... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'gays', 'main_type': 'jokes_about_a_group_which_play_off_stereotypes', 'justification': "The text uses humor to ridicule a group ('how gays think they are normal') and implies they are not normal through a mocking tone ('It's like some big joke'). This fits the criteria for animosit... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'Gays', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not use explicit non-human comparisons or metaphors. It expresses derogatory views by mocking the perceived normality of gays, but this falls under derogation rather than dehumanization as it lacks a comparison to non-hu... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'gays', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains derogatory language towards the LGBTQ+ community ('gays'), mocking their perception of normalcy. However, it lacks an actionable verb or incitement to harm and does not entail a serious threat or intent to inflict harm ... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text mocks gay people but does not support or endorse a specific hate entity as defined by the guidelines.', 'confidence': 0.9} | true | gays | portraying_group_as_evil_or_wrong_through_negative_representations | The text mocks and belittles gays by implying that their self-perception as 'normal' is laughable and akin to a 'big joke.' This constitutes an explicit negative representation of the group. | 0.95 | true | gays | jokes_about_a_group_which_play_off_stereotypes | The text uses humor to ridicule a group ('how gays think they are normal') and implies they are not normal through a mocking tone ('It's like some big joke'). This fits the criteria for animosity through stereotyping and ridicule without direct insults or explicit pejoratives. | 0.95 | false | Gays | null | The text does not use explicit non-human comparisons or metaphors. It expresses derogatory views by mocking the perceived normality of gays, but this falls under derogation rather than dehumanization as it lacks a comparison to non-human entities. | 0.9 | false | gays | null | The text contains derogatory language towards the LGBTQ+ community ('gays'), mocking their perception of normalcy. However, it lacks an actionable verb or incitement to harm and does not entail a serious threat or intent to inflict harm on the group. Hence, it does not meet the criteria for a 'threа | 0.8 | false | null | null | The text mocks gay people but does not support or endorse a specific hate entity as defined by the guidelines. | 0.9 |
10,205 | acl19182 | 10,205 | My parents say they're glad I'm not a disgusting queer, I hate them for that | nothate | none | none | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl19893 | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'queer', 'main_type': 'absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults', 'justification': "The text includes a direct derogatory term 'disgusting' combined with 'queer', which targets the queer community explicitly and negatively, fulfilling the criteria for Derogati... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains an explicit derogatory term 'disgusting queer' directly applied to a group, which aligns with explicit derogation rather than more subtle animosity.", 'confidence': 0.9} | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'Queer', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text uses derogatory language ('disgusting') towards the target group ('queer') but does not use a metaphor or comparison to a non-human entity, which is necessary for classification as dehumanization. Therefore, it is classified... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text expresses personal resentment towards the speaker's parents due to their views, but it doesn't contain a threat or incitement of harm against any group. It reflects personal disagreement and animosity rather than expressing an int... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text does not support or glorify a hateful entity. Instead, it expresses personal disapproval towards the parents' homophobic attitude.", 'confidence': 0.95} | true | queer | absolute_statements_of_negativity_using_stereotypes_or_insults | The text includes a direct derogatory term 'disgusting' combined with 'queer', which targets the queer community explicitly and negatively, fulfilling the criteria for Derogation. | 0.95 | false | null | null | The text contains an explicit derogatory term 'disgusting queer' directly applied to a group, which aligns with explicit derogation rather than more subtle animosity. | 0.9 | false | Queer | null | The text uses derogatory language ('disgusting') towards the target group ('queer') but does not use a metaphor or comparison to a non-human entity, which is necessary for classification as dehumanization. Therefore, it is classified as Derogation, not Dehumanization. | 1 | false | null | null | The text expresses personal resentment towards the speaker's parents due to their views, but it doesn't contain a threat or incitement of harm against any group. It reflects personal disagreement and animosity rather than expressing an intent to harm. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text does not support or glorify a hateful entity. Instead, it expresses personal disapproval towards the parents' homophobic attitude. | 0.95 |
10,206 | acl19183 | 10,206 | neo nazis that hold their values high are my personal role models | hate | support | nazis | original | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2a | acl12041 | false | false | false | false | true | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text expresses admiration for the values of 'neo nazis' but does not explicitly demean, insult, or portray a group in strong negative terms. It does not meet the criteria for derogation as there is no direct negative characterization or... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses an admiration for neo-nazis, which might imply support for a hateful entity but does not explicitly target or express hostility toward a specific group as per the animosity criteria.', 'confidence': 0.8} | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'neo nazis', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not contain a non-human comparison or metaphor. It expresses admiration for neo nazis, but this is not an instance of dehumanization as defined, since there is no explicit comparison to a non-human entity involved.'... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'neo nazis', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses admiration for neo nazis without advocating harm or inciting violence. There is no direct intent or call to action for harm against a group.', 'confidence': 0.8} | {'support': 'Yes', 'target_entity': 'neo nazis', 'main_type': 'hate_organization', 'justification': "The text explicitly states 'neo nazis' are the speaker's 'personal role models,' which constitutes direct glorification and moral justification of a universally recognized hate organization and its values.", 'confidence... | false | null | null | The text expresses admiration for the values of 'neo nazis' but does not explicitly demean, insult, or portray a group in strong negative terms. It does not meet the criteria for derogation as there is no direct negative characterization or dehumanization of a group. | 0.85 | false | null | null | The text expresses an admiration for neo-nazis, which might imply support for a hateful entity but does not explicitly target or express hostility toward a specific group as per the animosity criteria. | 0.8 | false | neo nazis | null | The text does not contain a non-human comparison or metaphor. It expresses admiration for neo nazis, but this is not an instance of dehumanization as defined, since there is no explicit comparison to a non-human entity involved. | 1 | false | neo nazis | null | The text expresses admiration for neo nazis without advocating harm or inciting violence. There is no direct intent or call to action for harm against a group. | 0.8 | true | neo nazis | hate_organization | The text explicitly states 'neo nazis' are the speaker's 'personal role models,' which constitutes direct glorification and moral justification of a universally recognized hate organization and its values. | 1 |
10,207 | acl19184 | 10,207 | It's cute how parents try so hard to pretend their disabled children are normal | hate | derogation | dis | original | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2a | acl20473 | false | false | true | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'disabled children', 'main_type': 'portraying_group_as_having_negative_impact_on_society', 'justification': "The text explicitly targets 'disabled children' implying that they are not normal. This statement derogates the group by suggesting that efforts to see them as normal are pr... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'parents of disabled children', 'main_type': 'undermining_the_experiences_and_treatment_of_groups', 'justification': "The text subtly ridicules parents of disabled children by implying their efforts to treat their children as 'normal' are futile or false, thereby undermining their e... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'Parents of disabled children', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text makes a derogatory statement by trivializing the efforts of parents, which could be interpreted as mocking or belittling, but it does not employ any non-human metaphor or comparison. There is no explic... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Disabled children', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text mocks parents of disabled children by implying their efforts to treat their children as 'normal' are misguided or futile. It does not contain an actionable threat, intent to harm, or incitement to harm against a spe... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not endorse or glorify any hate entity. It makes an insensitive remark about disabled children but does not support known hateful organizations, events, acts, individuals, or symbols.', 'confidence': 0.9} | true | disabled children | portraying_group_as_having_negative_impact_on_society | The text explicitly targets 'disabled children' implying that they are not normal. This statement derogates the group by suggesting that efforts to see them as normal are pretentious, thus negatively framing their identity. | 0.95 | true | parents of disabled children | undermining_the_experiences_and_treatment_of_groups | The text subtly ridicules parents of disabled children by implying their efforts to treat their children as 'normal' are futile or false, thereby undermining their experiences and perseverance. | 0.9 | false | Parents of disabled children | null | The text makes a derogatory statement by trivializing the efforts of parents, which could be interpreted as mocking or belittling, but it does not employ any non-human metaphor or comparison. There is no explicit equating of the target group to a non-human entity or concept, therefore it does notfit | 0.8 | false | Disabled children | null | The text mocks parents of disabled children by implying their efforts to treat their children as 'normal' are misguided or futile. It does not contain an actionable threat, intent to harm, or incitement to harm against a specific group. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text does not endorse or glorify any hate entity. It makes an insensitive remark about disabled children but does not support known hateful organizations, events, acts, individuals, or symbols. | 0.9 |
10,208 | acl19185 | 10,208 | I don’t really feel comfortable talking to a xenophobee, especially if they come from a far right position and don't even have belief in proper democracy and law and order. Go far enough away from the centre, you get all sorts of bizarre ways of governing | nothate | none | none | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl12069 | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses discomfort with xenophobes, particularly those with far-right views, but it does not explicitly demean or insult a specific group. It critiques a political stance rather than a protected identity group.', 'confidence': 0.... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text expresses a personal discomfort with individuals identified as 'xenophobees' and 'far right,' but it does not use implicit means, innuendo, or framing devices to denigrate a group. It directly states a discomfort with specific polit... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'xenophobes', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text criticizes a group referred to as 'xenophobes', particularly those aligning with far-right ideologies. However, it does not equate them to non-human entities or make a dehumanizing comparison. The language used is derog... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Far right individuals', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not contain any explicit or implicit threats of harm towards a group; it merely expresses discomfort and critique of individuals with far-right views.', 'confidence': 0.85} | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses discomfort with xenophobia and far-right ideologies, suggesting a critique rather than support for any hateful entities.', 'confidence': 1.0} | false | null | null | The text expresses discomfort with xenophobes, particularly those with far-right views, but it does not explicitly demean or insult a specific group. It critiques a political stance rather than a protected identity group. | 0.85 | false | null | null | The text expresses a personal discomfort with individuals identified as 'xenophobees' and 'far right,' but it does not use implicit means, innuendo, or framing devices to denigrate a group. It directly states a discomfort with specific political beliefs rather than a group identity. | 0.85 | false | xenophobes | null | The text criticizes a group referred to as 'xenophobes', particularly those aligning with far-right ideologies. However, it does not equate them to non-human entities or make a dehumanizing comparison. The language used is derogatory towards their beliefs but does not meet the criteria for dehumaniz | 0.9 | false | Far right individuals | null | The text does not contain any explicit or implicit threats of harm towards a group; it merely expresses discomfort and critique of individuals with far-right views. | 0.85 | false | null | null | The text expresses discomfort with xenophobia and far-right ideologies, suggesting a critique rather than support for any hateful entities. | 1 |
10,209 | acl19186 | 10,209 | Huge fan of those who expose these fake muslims that try so hard to convince everyone they are peaceful and decent like the rest of us, as if! | hate | derogation | mus | original | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2a | acl12070 | false | false | true | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Muslims', 'main_type': 'portraying_group_as_evil_or_wrong_through_negative_representations', 'justification': "The text explicitly targets 'Muslims' by labeling them as 'fake' and suggests they deceitfully attempt to appear peaceful and decent. This is a derogation as it portrays ... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'Muslims', 'main_type': 'implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group', 'justification': "The text conveys a negative view of Muslims by implying they are generally not peaceful or decent. The derogatory phrase 'fake Muslims' suggests an accusation of deceit or insinc... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'Fake Muslims', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text describes 'fake Muslims' and uses derogatory language questioning their sincerity. However, it does not explicitly liken them to non-human entities. It is an example of derogation rather than dehumanization.", 'confid... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Muslims', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text expresses derogation towards Muslims by labeling them as 'fake' and questioning their peacefulness and decency. However, it does not include a specific call to action, threat of harm, or incitement to violence, which are requ... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The statement criticizes a group ('fake muslims') without explicitly supporting or glorifying a recognized hate entity. It does not praise or justify specific hateful actions, events, organizations, individuals, or symbols.", 'confidence': 0.... | true | Muslims | portraying_group_as_evil_or_wrong_through_negative_representations | The text explicitly targets 'Muslims' by labeling them as 'fake' and suggests they deceitfully attempt to appear peaceful and decent. This is a derogation as it portrays them negatively and implies dishonesty and malevolent intentions. | 0.9 | true | Muslims | implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group | The text conveys a negative view of Muslims by implying they are generally not peaceful or decent. The derogatory phrase 'fake Muslims' suggests an accusation of deceit or insincerity, thereby undermining the group. This sentiment is expressed implicitly without using overt slurs, through skepticism | 0.9 | false | Fake Muslims | null | The text describes 'fake Muslims' and uses derogatory language questioning their sincerity. However, it does not explicitly liken them to non-human entities. It is an example of derogation rather than dehumanization. | 0.8 | false | Muslims | null | The text expresses derogation towards Muslims by labeling them as 'fake' and questioning their peacefulness and decency. However, it does not include a specific call to action, threat of harm, or incitement to violence, which are required for it to be classified as threatening under the given schema | 0.85 | false | null | null | The statement criticizes a group ('fake muslims') without explicitly supporting or glorifying a recognized hate entity. It does not praise or justify specific hateful actions, events, organizations, individuals, or symbols. | 0.8 |
10,210 | acl19187 | 10,210 | Pathethic how these gays try so hard to convince everyone they are like the rest of us! | hate | derogation | gay | original | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2a | acl12075 | false | false | true | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'gays', 'main_type': 'portraying_group_as_having_negative_impact_on_society', 'justification': "The text demeans the group 'gays' by describing them as 'pathetic' and implying that they are not like the 'rest of us.' This constitutes a negative representation and derogation, fittin... | {'animosity': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'gays', 'main_type': 'implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group', 'justification': "The text expresses animosity towards gays by implying they are not like 'the rest of us' and ridicules their efforts to be accepted, using derogatory language to convey a negative v... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'Gays', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains derogatory language directed at 'gays', but it does not explicitly compare them to non-human entities. The statement implies social exclusion, suggesting they are not 'like the rest of us', which is derogation, not d... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'gays', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses a derogatory view towards gay people, dismissing their efforts to seek acceptance. However, it does not contain an actionable verb or incitement to harm, nor does it meet the criteria for threatening language as it lac... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains derogatory language targeting the LGBTQ+ community but does not explicitly glorify or support any hateful entities. It expresses animosity rather than endorsement of a known hate figure or act.', 'confidence': 0.85} | true | gays | portraying_group_as_having_negative_impact_on_society | The text demeans the group 'gays' by describing them as 'pathetic' and implying that they are not like the 'rest of us.' This constitutes a negative representation and derogation, fitting the definition by explicitly showing negativity towards the group. | 0.95 | true | gays | implying_that_the_speaker_has_a_negative_view_about_a_group | The text expresses animosity towards gays by implying they are not like 'the rest of us' and ridicules their efforts to be accepted, using derogatory language to convey a negative view implicitly. | 0.95 | false | Gays | null | The text contains derogatory language directed at 'gays', but it does not explicitly compare them to non-human entities. The statement implies social exclusion, suggesting they are not 'like the rest of us', which is derogation, not dehumanization. | 0.85 | false | gays | null | The text expresses a derogatory view towards gay people, dismissing their efforts to seek acceptance. However, it does not contain an actionable verb or incitement to harm, nor does it meet the criteria for threatening language as it lacks a clear intent to cause harm. | 0.85 | false | null | null | The text contains derogatory language targeting the LGBTQ+ community but does not explicitly glorify or support any hateful entities. It expresses animosity rather than endorsement of a known hate figure or act. | 0.85 |
10,211 | acl19188 | 10,211 | these days are not pleasant | nothate | none | none | perturbation | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2b | acl12076 | false | false | false | true | false | false | {'derogation': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not target any specific group and lacks explicit negativity towards a group. It simply expresses a subjective view on current times, which is not considered derogatory.', 'confidence': 0.9} | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The statement is general and does not target any specific group. There is no implicit or explicit animosity indicated towards a group.', 'confidence': 0.9} | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not express a comparison or metaphor that equates a group or individual to a non-human entity. It simply makes a general statement about the pleasantness of the days, which does not fall under the criteria for dehumanizati... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The statement 'these days are not pleasant' does not contain any actionable verb or intent to harm, nor does it incite any harm against a group or individual. It simply expresses a general sentiment about the current times being unpleasant... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text does not mention any specific hate entity, nor does it provide support, glorification, or justification for a hateful entity or ideology. It is a general statement about the current unpleasantness of days, with no clear link to recog... | false | null | null | The text does not target any specific group and lacks explicit negativity towards a group. It simply expresses a subjective view on current times, which is not considered derogatory. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The statement is general and does not target any specific group. There is no implicit or explicit animosity indicated towards a group. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text does not express a comparison or metaphor that equates a group or individual to a non-human entity. It simply makes a general statement about the pleasantness of the days, which does not fall under the criteria for dehumanization. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The statement 'these days are not pleasant' does not contain any actionable verb or intent to harm, nor does it incite any harm against a group or individual. It simply expresses a general sentiment about the current times being unpleasant, without any mention of violence or threat. | 0.8 | false | null | null | The text does not mention any specific hate entity, nor does it provide support, glorification, or justification for a hateful entity or ideology. It is a general statement about the current unpleasantness of days, with no clear link to recognized hate entities or themes. | 1 |
10,212 | acl19189 | 10,212 | I am a fan of calling gays faggots so that people don't think they are like the rest of us, as if! | hate | derogation | gay | original | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2a | acl12083 | false | false | true | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'gays', 'main_type': 'hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context', 'justification': "The text explicitly targets 'gays' using a well-known slur 'faggots' in a derogatory manner, aiming to insult and separate them from others. This fits the criteria for Derog... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains an explicit slur ('faggots') used derogatorily against the group 'gays', which falls under explicit derogation rather than implicit hostility or animosity.", 'confidence': 0.9} | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'gays', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text uses derogatory language ('faggots') towards 'gays', but it does not make an explicit non-human comparison. The term used is a slur which falls under derogation rather than dehumanization as per the guidelines, as there is no... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Gays', 'main_type': 'intimidation/harassment', 'justification': "The text uses a derogatory term to describe 'gays', intending to differentiate and exclude them verbally. However, it does not include an actionable threat or incite violent harm, thus not meeting the criteria for a ... | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text contains derogatory language targeting a sexual orientation but does not glorify or support a known hate organization, event, individual, act, or trope. It expresses animosity without endorsing a recognized hate entity.', 'confidence... | true | gays | hateful_use_of_slurs_without_reclamation_or_counter_speech_context | The text explicitly targets 'gays' using a well-known slur 'faggots' in a derogatory manner, aiming to insult and separate them from others. This fits the criteria for Derogation due to the use of explicit hate speech without any counter-speech or reclamation context. | 0.99 | false | null | null | The text contains an explicit slur ('faggots') used derogatorily against the group 'gays', which falls under explicit derogation rather than implicit hostility or animosity. | 0.9 | false | gays | null | The text uses derogatory language ('faggots') towards 'gays', but it does not make an explicit non-human comparison. The term used is a slur which falls under derogation rather than dehumanization as per the guidelines, as there is no metaphor equating the target group to a non-human entity. | 0.8 | false | Gays | intimidation/harassment | The text uses a derogatory term to describe 'gays', intending to differentiate and exclude them verbally. However, it does not include an actionable threat or incite violent harm, thus not meeting the criteria for a threatening statement as defined. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text contains derogatory language targeting a sexual orientation but does not glorify or support a known hate organization, event, individual, act, or trope. It expresses animosity without endorsing a recognized hate entity. | 0.9 |
10,214 | acl19190 | 10,214 | Pocahontas and Tiger Lily were hot in the cartoons, but only in the movies - the actual ones, ugghh nauseating, I cant stand natives | hate | derogation | indig | original | test | 2 | oemYWm1Tjg | 2a | acl12090 | false | false | true | false | false | false | {'derogation': 'Yes', 'target_group': 'natives', 'main_type': 'expressing_intensely_negative_emotions_like_hate_or_dislike', 'justification': "The text explicitly targets 'natives' and uses strong negative language indicating disgust and inability to tolerate them, which fits the definition of expressing intensely nega... | {'animosity': 'No', 'target_group': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text contains an explicit derogatory statement, which falls under Derogation rather than Animosity as defined by the criteria. It uses a direct negative adjective 'nauseating' related to the group 'natives', indicating overt hostility.",... | {'dehumanization': 'No', 'target_group': 'natives', 'main_type': None, 'justification': "The text expresses derogatory opinions towards 'natives' based on appearance, but it does not equate them to a non-human entity or use a specific non-human metaphor. Thus, it does not meet the criteria for dehumanization, although ... | {'threatening': 'No', 'target_group': 'Natives', 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses derogatory opinions towards native people but does not contain actionable threats, incitement, or intent to harm. It lacks an actionable verb or suggestion of harm and is primarily derogatory.', 'confidence': 0.9} | {'support': 'No', 'target_entity': None, 'main_type': None, 'justification': 'The text expresses derogatory opinions about Native Americans but does not glorify or support a historically recognized hate entity. It reflects personal bias rather than endorsement of a hate group or ideology.', 'confidence': 0.9} | true | natives | expressing_intensely_negative_emotions_like_hate_or_dislike | The text explicitly targets 'natives' and uses strong negative language indicating disgust and inability to tolerate them, which fits the definition of expressing intensely negative emotions like hate or dislike, qualifying as Derogation. | 0.95 | false | null | null | The text contains an explicit derogatory statement, which falls under Derogation rather than Animosity as defined by the criteria. It uses a direct negative adjective 'nauseating' related to the group 'natives', indicating overt hostility. | 0.9 | false | natives | null | The text expresses derogatory opinions towards 'natives' based on appearance, but it does not equate them to a non-human entity or use a specific non-human metaphor. Thus, it does not meet the criteria for dehumanization, although it is derogatory. | 0.85 | false | Natives | null | The text expresses derogatory opinions towards native people but does not contain actionable threats, incitement, or intent to harm. It lacks an actionable verb or suggestion of harm and is primarily derogatory. | 0.9 | false | null | null | The text expresses derogatory opinions about Native Americans but does not glorify or support a historically recognized hate entity. It reflects personal bias rather than endorsement of a hate group or ideology. | 0.9 |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
No dataset card yet
- Downloads last month
- 23