aidos-lab/mich-embeddings-binary-mixed-bread-large

text stringlengths 12 234k	embeddings listlengths 128 128
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 20, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.	[ -108, 108, -33, -84, -118, -32, 83, 29, 65, -89, 111, -45, -81, -14, 20, 127, -83, 15, 116, 91, -37, -78, 23, -63, 114, -13, -38, -35, 51, 111, -12, 56, 78, 96, -102, -108, 70, -63, 105, 80, -114, 7, -39, 77, -47, 88, 56, ...
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 12, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.	[ -111, 104, -35, -68, -86, -32, -13, 29, 65, -89, 111, -45, -83, -14, 20, 95, -67, 15, 103, 90, -33, -79, 19, -64, 114, -13, -98, -36, 113, 110, -12, 56, 78, 112, -102, -108, 70, -55, 73, -16, -116, 7, -39, -51, -47, 16, 24, ...
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 16, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions for appointment of appellate counsel, for immediate discharge, to pres...	[ -112, -6, -35, -84, -118, -31, -77, -99, 65, -29, 63, 81, -81, -6, 20, 123, 74, 111, 117, 121, 79, -79, 87, 65, -14, -45, -38, -35, -13, 110, -28, 56, 14, -16, -118, -108, 70, -55, -53, 16, -114, 7, -7, -52, -47, -23, 40, ...
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the February 5, 2018 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.	[ -112, 120, -44, -84, -120, -16, -13, -67, 65, -25, 47, 83, -81, -6, -108, 123, -97, 15, 117, -5, -39, -77, 119, 89, -10, -13, -109, 95, -13, -26, -28, 56, 78, 112, -102, -108, 70, -64, 75, -112, -114, 7, -7, -19, -15, 78, 56...
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 10, 2017 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.	[ -111, -8, -35, -84, -120, -32, -29, 29, 64, -25, 103, -45, -81, -46, -108, 127, -82, 15, 116, -37, 95, -77, 19, -56, 122, -14, -37, -36, 115, 110, -12, 56, 14, 96, -102, -108, 70, -63, 107, 112, -116, 7, -103, 13, -111, 34, ...
On order of the Court, the motions to file a reply brief are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the September 12, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE Section II of the Court of Appeals opinion, and we REMAND this case...	[ -28, 120, -35, -88, 42, 96, 50, -100, 67, -45, 35, 83, -65, -14, -108, 127, -5, 63, 97, 107, -41, -79, 71, -64, 118, -13, -110, -33, 115, 94, -12, 86, 76, 114, -118, -43, 70, -113, -53, 88, -122, 5, -101, 77, 89, 64, 52, 3...
On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellee to extend the time for filing her answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before August 1, 2018.	[ -12, 112, -4, -116, 42, 97, 112, -100, 97, -45, 103, 83, -89, -38, -108, 127, -53, 111, -57, -13, -54, 55, 119, -39, 114, -13, -45, 93, 124, 126, -12, 125, 76, 114, 10, -108, 70, -56, -55, 28, -114, 15, -101, -20, -47, 72, 4...
On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to extend the time for filing her supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before July 30, 2018.	[ 116, 114, -4, -51, -118, 32, 48, -66, 96, -53, 103, 83, -73, -54, 20, 125, -113, 111, 69, -45, -29, -93, 39, 89, -14, -45, -45, 95, 124, 127, -10, -65, 76, 48, -118, 21, 70, -40, -119, 28, -98, -119, -103, -32, -47, 106, 32,...
On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to extend the time for filing her supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before July 9, 2018.	[ 116, 114, -76, -52, 10, 32, 48, -66, -31, -37, 103, 83, -73, -54, 4, 127, -81, 107, 69, -13, -9, -77, 103, 89, -46, -45, -45, 95, 120, 127, -10, -65, 12, 48, -54, 21, 70, -56, -119, 28, -98, -119, -103, -32, -47, 98, 32, 1...
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The motion to stay the effect of the Court of Appeals judgment and order is considered, and it is DENIED. The application for leave to appeal the June 7, 2018 judgment and order of the Court of Appeals remains pending.	[ -46, 112, -43, -20, -118, 112, -15, -75, 65, -105, 39, 83, -81, -14, -108, 127, -113, 111, 117, -5, -37, -77, 103, -47, -14, -77, -61, 95, 51, -10, -27, 54, -50, 114, -118, -44, 70, -55, -51, 82, -114, 7, -40, -19, -15, 79, ...
BOONSTRA, J. Defendant Orchard Hiltz & McCliment, Inc. (OHM) appeals by right the trial court's order dismissing this case, which plaintiff, the Estate of Michael Koch, filed after Michael was killed in an explosion at the village of Dexter's (Dexter) wastewater treatment plant. OHM was Dexter's engineer for an improve...	[ -112, 105, 88, -20, 10, -90, 26, -104, 73, -113, -27, 117, -17, -10, 25, 59, -21, 125, 64, 123, 100, -77, 67, 2, -41, -77, -13, -44, -8, 111, -12, -33, -52, 32, -122, 45, -62, -128, -1, 88, 70, 20, -87, -7, 113, 64, 52, 12...
MCCORMACK, J. This case presents the question whether the Michigan sentencing guidelines violate a defendant’s Sixth Amendment fundamental right to a jury trial. We conclude that the rule from Apprendi v New Jersey, 530 US 466; 120 S Ct 2348; 147 L Ed 2d 435 (2000), as extended by Alleyne v United States, 570 US_; 133 ...	[ 112, -30, -35, -2, 11, 33, 10, 22, 51, -85, -73, -45, -81, -49, -123, 59, -3, 123, 81, 113, 84, -125, 38, -63, 54, -77, -55, -47, 50, 126, -82, -3, 8, -16, -54, 117, -30, 11, -47, 86, -114, -99, -70, 97, 88, 16, 48, 119, ...
Memorandum Opinion. In People v Shekoski, 393 Mich 134; 224 NW2d 656 (1974), this Court reversed a guilty plea conviction and declared: "The requirements for a valid guilty plea after June 1, 1973 are set forth specifically in GCR 1963, 785.7. The bench and bar are hereby advised that strict adherence to those requirem...	[ -80, -6, -35, -71, -88, 96, 57, -99, 17, -9, -25, 115, -91, -46, 20, 59, -101, 59, 20, 97, -47, -93, 22, -61, 55, -13, -125, -47, -1, 95, -28, -68, 77, -96, -38, -75, 102, -118, -128, 88, -82, 5, 26, -29, 120, 67, 48, 36, ...

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 20, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

[ -108, 108, -33, -84, -118, -32, 83, 29, 65, -89, 111, -45, -81, -14, 20, 127, -83, 15, 116, 91, -37, -78, 23, -63, 114, -13, -38, -35, 51, 111, -12, 56, 78, 96, -102, -108, 70, -63, 105, 80, -114, 7, -39, 77, -47, 88, 56, ...

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 12, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

[ -111, 104, -35, -68, -86, -32, -13, 29, 65, -89, 111, -45, -83, -14, 20, 95, -67, 15, 103, 90, -33, -79, 19, -64, 114, -13, -98, -36, 113, 110, -12, 56, 78, 112, -102, -108, 70, -55, 73, -16, -116, 7, -39, -51, -47, 16, 24, ...

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 16, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions for appointment of appellate counsel, for immediate discharge, to pres...

[ -112, -6, -35, -84, -118, -31, -77, -99, 65, -29, 63, 81, -81, -6, 20, 123, 74, 111, 117, 121, 79, -79, 87, 65, -14, -45, -38, -35, -13, 110, -28, 56, 14, -16, -118, -108, 70, -55, -53, 16, -114, 7, -7, -52, -47, -23, 40, ...

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the February 5, 2018 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

[ -112, 120, -44, -84, -120, -16, -13, -67, 65, -25, 47, 83, -81, -6, -108, 123, -97, 15, 117, -5, -39, -77, 119, 89, -10, -13, -109, 95, -13, -26, -28, 56, 78, 112, -102, -108, 70, -64, 75, -112, -114, 7, -7, -19, -15, 78, 56...

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 10, 2017 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

[ -111, -8, -35, -84, -120, -32, -29, 29, 64, -25, 103, -45, -81, -46, -108, 127, -82, 15, 116, -37, 95, -77, 19, -56, 122, -14, -37, -36, 115, 110, -12, 56, 14, 96, -102, -108, 70, -63, 107, 112, -116, 7, -103, 13, -111, 34, ...

On order of the Court, the motions to file a reply brief are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the September 12, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE Section II of the Court of Appeals opinion, and we REMAND this case...

[ -28, 120, -35, -88, 42, 96, 50, -100, 67, -45, 35, 83, -65, -14, -108, 127, -5, 63, 97, 107, -41, -79, 71, -64, 118, -13, -110, -33, 115, 94, -12, 86, 76, 114, -118, -43, 70, -113, -53, 88, -122, 5, -101, 77, 89, 64, 52, 3...

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellee to extend the time for filing her answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before August 1, 2018.

[ -12, 112, -4, -116, 42, 97, 112, -100, 97, -45, 103, 83, -89, -38, -108, 127, -53, 111, -57, -13, -54, 55, 119, -39, 114, -13, -45, 93, 124, 126, -12, 125, 76, 114, 10, -108, 70, -56, -55, 28, -114, 15, -101, -20, -47, 72, 4...

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to extend the time for filing her supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before July 30, 2018.

[ 116, 114, -4, -51, -118, 32, 48, -66, 96, -53, 103, 83, -73, -54, 20, 125, -113, 111, 69, -45, -29, -93, 39, 89, -14, -45, -45, 95, 124, 127, -10, -65, 76, 48, -118, 21, 70, -40, -119, 28, -98, -119, -103, -32, -47, 106, 32,...

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to extend the time for filing her supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before July 9, 2018.

[ 116, 114, -76, -52, 10, 32, 48, -66, -31, -37, 103, 83, -73, -54, 4, 127, -81, 107, 69, -13, -9, -77, 103, 89, -46, -45, -45, 95, 120, 127, -10, -65, 12, 48, -54, 21, 70, -56, -119, 28, -98, -119, -103, -32, -47, 98, 32, 1...

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The motion to stay the effect of the Court of Appeals judgment and order is considered, and it is DENIED. The application for leave to appeal the June 7, 2018 judgment and order of the Court of Appeals remains pending.

[ -46, 112, -43, -20, -118, 112, -15, -75, 65, -105, 39, 83, -81, -14, -108, 127, -113, 111, 117, -5, -37, -77, 103, -47, -14, -77, -61, 95, 51, -10, -27, 54, -50, 114, -118, -44, 70, -55, -51, 82, -114, 7, -40, -19, -15, 79, ...

BOONSTRA, J. Defendant Orchard Hiltz & McCliment, Inc. (OHM) appeals by right the trial court's order dismissing this case, which plaintiff, the Estate of Michael Koch, filed after Michael was killed in an explosion at the village of Dexter's (Dexter) wastewater treatment plant. OHM was Dexter's engineer for an improve...

[ -112, 105, 88, -20, 10, -90, 26, -104, 73, -113, -27, 117, -17, -10, 25, 59, -21, 125, 64, 123, 100, -77, 67, 2, -41, -77, -13, -44, -8, 111, -12, -33, -52, 32, -122, 45, -62, -128, -1, 88, 70, 20, -87, -7, 113, 64, 52, 12...

MCCORMACK, J. This case presents the question whether the Michigan sentencing guidelines violate a defendant’s Sixth Amendment fundamental right to a jury trial. We conclude that the rule from Apprendi v New Jersey, 530 US 466; 120 S Ct 2348; 147 L Ed 2d 435 (2000), as extended by Alleyne v United States, 570 US_; 133 ...

[ 112, -30, -35, -2, 11, 33, 10, 22, 51, -85, -73, -45, -81, -49, -123, 59, -3, 123, 81, 113, 84, -125, 38, -63, 54, -77, -55, -47, 50, 126, -82, -3, 8, -16, -54, 117, -30, 11, -47, 86, -114, -99, -70, 97, 88, 16, 48, 119, ...

Memorandum Opinion. In People v Shekoski, 393 Mich 134; 224 NW2d 656 (1974), this Court reversed a guilty plea conviction and declared: "The requirements for a valid guilty plea after June 1, 1973 are set forth specifically in GCR 1963, 785.7. The bench and bar are hereby advised that strict adherence to those requirem...

[ -80, -6, -35, -71, -88, 96, 57, -99, 17, -9, -25, 115, -91, -46, 20, 59, -101, 59, 20, 97, -47, -93, 22, -61, 55, -13, -125, -47, -1, 95, -28, -68, 77, -96, -38, -75, 102, -118, -128, 88, -82, 5, 26, -29, 120, 67, 48, 36, ...