hypothesis
stringlengths 11
195
| facts
stringlengths 21
2.46k
| proofs
stringlengths 0
523
| proof_label
stringclasses 3
values | steps
int64 0
5
| num_all_distractors
int64 0
21
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The fact that nonmovingness does not takes place and abdominovesicalness does not happens is false.
|
fact1: Neither deployment nor mindlessness take place. fact2: Sustainableness does not happens and cousinliness does not takes place. fact3: Abdominovesicalness does not occurs. fact4: Skylarking Polypodiaceae does not occurs. fact5: Nonmovingness does not happens. fact6: Fermentableness does not takes place.
|
fact5 & fact3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 1
| 4
|
This coping is unpriestly.
|
fact1: The statement that either Imelda is a tortuousness or it does not react or both holds. fact2: If Imelda is unpriestly this coping does not react. fact3: This coping is not a tortuousness if Imelda does not react. fact4: That Imelda is unpriestly if this coping does not react is valid. fact5: This coping reacts if Imelda is not a tortuousness. fact6: This coping is unpriestly if Imelda does not react. fact7: If Imelda is a tortuousness then this coping is priestly. fact8: Harrison does not react. fact9: If that Imelda does not react is correct then this coping is not unpriestly. fact10: The fact that if this coping is a tortuousness Imelda is not unpriestly holds. fact11: Imelda is not unpriestly. fact12: This coping is not a tortuousness if Imelda is priestly. fact13: If Imelda is not unpriestly then this coping reacts.
|
fact1 & fact7 & fact9 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 1
| 10
|
Coco is not a tango.
|
fact1: If there is some man such that this one is not a officiousness this vine is not a sprouted and is a pettiness. fact2: That Riesling either is not a pettiness or is not a sprouted or both. fact3: Coco is a tango if that that Riesling is not nondisposable is valid. fact4: That Riesling is classed as a officiousness if that Riesling is a tango. fact5: If that Riesling is not nondisposable Coco is not a kind of a tango. fact6: Coco is not a tango if that Riesling is not a officiousness. fact7: That Riesling is a tango if this person is a officiousness. fact8: All nondisposable persons are pettinesses. fact9: That that Riesling is a Fasciola is true if that Riesling is Falstaffian. fact10: Officiousnesses are sprouteds. fact11: A vertu is a Cibotium. fact12: Coco is not a officiousness. fact13: Coco is not a sprouted or it is not a pettiness or both if there exists something such that it is a officiousness. fact14: This hayfield is not a officiousness but it is classed as a Buchloe. fact15: If Coco is not nondisposable then that Riesling is not a tango. fact16: A Elops is diametral.
|
fact8 -> int1: If that Riesling is nondisposable then it is a pettiness.; fact10 -> int2: That Riesling is a sprouted if that Riesling is a officiousness.; int1 & fact2 & int2 -> int3: That Riesling is not nondisposable or it is not a officiousness or both.; int3 & fact5 & fact6 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 4
| 11
|
This caster is not an arrayed.
|
fact1: Everybody is an arrayed. fact2: There exists no one that is a Cuscuta and/or is not breaone. fact3: That planner is an arrayed. fact4: That everyone is non-breathless one that is not a Cuscuta is valid.
|
fact1 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 1
| 3
|
That ire and/or non-significantness happens does not hold.
|
fact1: That faecalness occurs is triggered by that comporting Bankia does not occurs. fact2: Non-pancreaticness prevents that ire does not happens. fact3: Ire and/or inquiry happens if Maleness does not takes place. fact4: That either prising occurs or flaring Athyriaceae happens or both is valid. fact5: Joyfulness happens. fact6: Either benison occurs or schism does not occurs or both. fact7: Lots or victimising Myrrhis or both takes place. fact8: Rating Hordeum occurs. fact9: Ire takes place and/or significantness occurs. fact10: Either inquiry does not takes place or pancreaticness does not happens or both. fact11: Inquiry happens.
|
fact11 -> int1: Ire takes place and/or inquiry occurs.; int1 -> int2: Inquiry occurs or ire occurs or both.; int2 -> int3: That inquiry does not occurs causes that ire takes place.; int3 & fact10 & fact2 -> int4: Ire happens.; int4 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 5
| 8
|
Insectivorousness and extrinsicness happen.
|
fact1: Both snarling Malopterurus and continuing Thraupidae take place. fact2: Sexploitation occurs and starlessness takes place. fact3: Terrestrialness happens and detoxification happens. fact4: Extrinsicness takes place. fact5: Sexploitation and groundball occur. fact6: Reproving aloofness takes place.
|
UNKNOWN
| 0
| 5
|
|
The statement that both philhellenicness and dialysis happen is wrong.
|
fact1: Both festival and animating occur. fact2: Beguiling Shiah happens. fact3: Countersuit occurs and/or philhellenicness occurs. fact4: That swelled does not occurs or crinkling Lebanon does not happens or both holds if bunting does not takes place. fact5: Inventorying and wiggle occur. fact6: Philhellenicness takes place. fact7: Philhellenicness prevents that pinch does not happens. fact8: Nurture occurs. fact9: If the fact that melee does not occurs holds then that countersuit does not happens and/or bunting does not happens is true. fact10: Calceiformness happens. fact11: That practising occurs and unicameralness occurs is right. fact12: Melee and dialysis take place. fact13: Either supernaturalisticness does not occurs or pinch does not happens or both. fact14: Supernaturalisticness is brought about by that oppugning does not occurs. fact15: Swelled and/or philhellenicness occurs.
|
fact12 -> int1: Dialysis occurs.; int1 & fact6 -> int2: Dialysis occurs and philhellenicness happens.; int2 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 3
| 13
|
That there is something such that if it is not cryptological then it is unjust is wrong.
|
fact1: That elastic is spherical if that elastic is not unjust. fact2: There is someone such that if it is not spherical it is an interior. fact3: All non-spherical things are not 10. fact4: That that Calymmatobacterium is unjust is correct if it is cryptological. fact5: All persons do not theologize or are non-cryptological or both. fact6: A amphisbaena is 10. fact7: There is somebody such that if it is not non-cryptological it is not fair. fact8: There is someone such that if that person does not occidentalise Baic that person grasps childlessness. fact9: If that Calymmatobacterium is not cryptological then that Calymmatobacterium is unjust. fact10: There is something such that if that this is not a Bahaism stands this is amicable. fact11: Somebody that is a graininess is not cryptological. fact12: Either all things are not non-carunculate or they are a kind of amphisbaenas or both. fact13: A spherical person is a graininess and/or theologizes. fact14: There is something such that if it is not legato it is a Tobagonian. fact15: All carunculate ones do not gripe interrogative. fact16: There is something such that if that does not occidentalise Baic then that is a Warhol. fact17: There is some man such that if he/she does not mull Blattodea then he/she is a paleornithology. fact18: If that Calymmatobacterium is not a kind of a cubit then that one is unjust. fact19: That some man is conductive stands if this person is unjust. fact20: There is something such that if it is not Old then it is a designed. fact21: There is somebody such that if that person is not a screenplay then that person is Proustian.
|
fact9 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 1
| 20
|
Technicalness occurs and/or experimentation does not takes place.
|
fact1: Not prompting Thoreau but hierarchalness occurs. fact2: Echoicness does not occurs but mothballing Lophophora occurs. fact3: Technicalness takes place. fact4: The claim that lidlessness occurs and experimentation occurs is invalid. fact5: Either lidlessness or postulationalness or both occurs. fact6: Retrogressing does not takes place. fact7: Hygienising imported takes place. fact8: Experimentation takes place.
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that non-technicalness and experimentation happen.; assump1 -> int1: Technicalness does not happens.; int1 & fact3 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: That non-technicalness and experimentation occur is false.; int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 5
| 7
|
Let's assume that this minimum is both not a Centropus and live.
|
fact1: That this minimum is a Centropus and live is invalid. fact2: This minimum is a Centropus. fact3: The fact that this minimum is not a kind of an alsatian but this thing is a Uintatherium does not stand.
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that this minimum is both not a Centropus and live.; assump1 -> int1: This minimum is not classified as a Centropus.; int1 & fact2 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 4
| 2
|
Both introversiveness and enterprise occur.
|
fact1: Clenching and updraft occur. fact2: Argumentativeness is prevented by that exercising does not happens. fact3: Underlying brings about enterprise. fact4: Secularness is triggered by pushing. fact5: That federation does not takes place is prevented by that response does not takes place. fact6: Crookesing and/or non-electricalness occurs. fact7: Leptosporangiateness takes place. fact8: If introversiveness happens response does not takes place and/or clenching does not happens. fact9: Pigsticking occurs if enlivening does not occurs. fact10: Introversiveness takes place and/or enterprise does not occurs if underlying does not takes place. fact11: Either underlying happens or phrase does not happens or both. fact12: Federation prevents that mudra does not happens. fact13: If removal occurs coercion takes place. fact14: Mudra does not happens or secularness does not occurs or both. fact15: Introversiveness takes place. fact16: Either phrase or that underlying does not occurs or both is triggered by perceptibleness. fact17: That enterprise does not occurs is prevented by that phrase does not occurs.
|
fact11 & fact3 & fact17 -> int1: Enterprise happens.; int1 & fact15 -> int2: Enterprise and introversiveness take place.; int2 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 3
| 13
|
Let's assume that that clingstone does not center decibel.
|
fact1: The thermoelectricity is anticlockwise. fact2: If there is somebody such that that it is a shrillness that is an alimony is incorrect then that clingstone is not anticlockwise. fact3: That that clingstone does not center decibel and is not anticlockwise is incorrect. fact4: There is something such that the fact that the fact that it is a shrillness and it is an alimony stands does not hold. fact5: If there is someone such that the person is not an alimony that clingstone is non-anticlockwise. fact6: If there exists something such that the thing is not non-anticlockwise that pirozhki is an alimony and a shrillness.
|
fact4 & fact2 -> int1: That clingstone is not anticlockwise.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that clingstone does not center decibel.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: That clingstone neither centers decibel nor is anticlockwise.; int2 & fact3 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 5
| 3
|
There is something such that if it is Jainist then it is a crowding.
|
fact1: That diagnostician does unthawed if that diagnostician is ungrateful. fact2: This nosepiece is bicipital if this nosepiece is a crowding. fact3: If German is a lock it is a quiet. fact4: This bower is Jainist if it is prognathic. fact5: If that diagnostician is a prickle that that diagnostician is Jainist holds. fact6: There is something such that if that thing does mythologise then that thing is a Phylloxeridae. fact7: There is something such that if it is a Tarawa that it is a PAGAD holds. fact8: There is something such that if this thing is sarcastic this thing is a Faeroese. fact9: That diagnostician is monocotyledonous if that that diagnostician mythologises is not wrong. fact10: There is somebody such that if that this person is a Jubbulpore is valid then this person is laniary. fact11: That diagnostician destains if it is a cut. fact12: That diagnostician does shank plumed if that diagnostician is a crowding. fact13: There is some man such that if the one is a Jabalpur then the one is a subculture. fact14: There is something such that if it extorts then it is rejective. fact15: There is something such that if this thing is a treated then this thing is peritoneal. fact16: There is something such that if it is ungrateful it is plumbable.
|
UNKNOWN
| 0
| 16
|
|
Let's assume that Mercy is not Scythian and/or it does not trail rhyming.
|
fact1: If that Mercy does not trail rhyming is not incorrect Mercy is not a Zacharias. fact2: That subvocalizer is not unpunished. fact3: That archive is a Zacharias and it is a Pyle. fact4: Some man is not a Zacharias if that person is non-Scythian. fact5: All non-unpunished persons are microbic and/or not vascular. fact6: The pterodactyl does not trail rhyming if that she/he is not prokaryotic holds. fact7: Mercy is a Zacharias if the thing does not trail rhyming. fact8: If a Zacharias is a Pyle this fluegelhorn is not Scythian. fact9: Mercy is a Zacharias. fact10: If there is somebody such that that person is punished and that person is a Pyle that subvocalizer is not a Zacharias. fact11: That archive is not unpunished but the thing is a Pyle. fact12: If Mercy is not a Zacharias Mercy is not superjacent. fact13: Everything is vascular or it is non-fungicidal or both. fact14: Every person is a Pyle and/or it is not fungicidal. fact15: There is someone such that that she/he is vascular and she/he is not microbic does not stand. fact16: That subvocalizer is not non-microbic if there is some person such that that this one is both not non-vascular and not non-microbic does not stand. fact17: All non-Scythian ones are punished or not Pyles or both. fact18: Some man is not fungicidal if the one is a solvent.
|
fact4 -> int1: If Mercy is not Scythian then Mercy is not a Zacharias.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that Mercy is not Scythian and/or it does not trail rhyming.; int1 & assump1 & fact1 -> int2: Mercy is not a Zacharias.; int2 & fact9 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 5
| 15
|
That primingness does not occurs is not incorrect.
|
fact1: Either designation happens or waging occurs or both. fact2: That afforestation does not happens leads to either handicapping Oireachtas or non-equivocalness or both. fact3: Waging triggers Kuwaitiness. fact4: That afforestation does not takes place yields that waging does not happens. fact5: If identifying Conodontophorida does not happens handicapping Oireachtas and/or non-equivocalness takes place. fact6: Sandpapering Nehemiah does not happens and/or computationalness takes place. fact7: Primingness happens. fact8: Waging is triggered by inopportuneness. fact9: Merchandising takes place. fact10: Sandpapering Nehemiah and/or waging takes place. fact11: Handicapping Oireachtas occurs. fact12: Primingness takes place if designation occurs. fact13: Thrashing Oldenburg and/or intraventricularness occurs. fact14: If equivocalness does not occurs then inopportuneness occurs and/or renting does not takes place. fact15: Non-Kuwaitiness or non-computationalness or both occurs. fact16: Afforestation takes place and/or sandpapering Nehemiah does not takes place. fact17: Waging occurs if that renting does not occurs stands. fact18: That primingness occurs brings about that designation does not happens and/or that identifying Conodontophorida does not takes place. fact19: Afforestation occurs and/or identifying Conodontophorida does not happens. fact20: Handicapping Oireachtas results in waging.
|
fact7 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 0
| 19
|
This whisk does not butter Andalusia.
|
fact1: A smoky one is not a hands and/or is not an imprinting. fact2: This whisk is not a tendonitis and/or it is not nonspherical if this Somalian does not butter Andalusia. fact3: All things are nonspherical things that are not Trinidads. fact4: This whisk is fledged and the thing butters Andalusia. fact5: If the fact that this whisk does not understand Ribes holds this Somalian is not a cycles/second or breakable or both. fact6: This tallow butters Andalusia. fact7: Something does not butter Andalusia if it is not a tendonitis. fact8: If something is not an imprinting then it does not butter Andalusia. fact9: If this Somalian is breakable then that pussycat is fledged. fact10: This whisk is fledged. fact11: All non-unbreakable ones are not widowhoods or are not autumns or both. fact12: If this Somalian is not a cycles/second that thing is a widowhood and/or that thing is fledged. fact13: If this whisk is not a tendonitis then it does not understand Ribes or is not fledged or both. fact14: Everything is a hands and/or does not butter Andalusia. fact15: If this Somalian is a widowhood that pussycat is fledged. fact16: This whisk either is not a cycles/second or does not understand Ribes or both if this Somalian is not fledged. fact17: That if this Somalian is fledged that pussycat is fledged is correct. fact18: If something does not understand Ribes then it is smoky and/or breakable.
|
fact4 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 1
| 17
|
There is something such that if it is not sensational then it is a Fringilla.
|
fact1: if that deaconess does not weave Oahu there is somebody such that it is not riparian or is a sociology or both.
|
UNKNOWN
| 0
| 0
|
|
There is some man such that if this person is not horary this person is a kind of a paramilitary and/or is a thirties.
|
fact1: If some person does not Cork desirability it is not non-rupicolous and/or it votes Medicaid. fact2: This alienor is catoptrical and/or this one is horary if this alienor is not a Nephelium. fact3: That something is fissile and/or it imagines Flindersia if it is not animatistic is valid. fact4: The shopaholic is armoured or it is a thirties or both if it is not nearer. fact5: If this alienor is horary this is a paramilitary or this is a thirties or both. fact6: Something is a siamese or does bewilder forecasting or both if it is not phallic. fact7: Someone is unlaurelled and/or the one is a poorness if the one does not incommode. fact8: If that this Montrachet is horary does not hold then this Montrachet either is a pneumogastric or titivates or both. fact9: There is something such that if that it is not an inconstancy holds it belabours Myricales and/or it is nonwoody. fact10: That there is some person such that if this one does not even Zeitgeist then this one is a Chlamydomonadaceae and/or this one is a pneumogastric holds. fact11: There is someone such that if it is not a unmercifulness either it is a rightfulness or it is not non-lathery or both. fact12: If this ichthyosaur is calicular then this ichthyosaur does traumatize Chlamydiaceae and/or it does jolt Porphyra. fact13: If some man is horary then this one is a paramilitary and/or is a thirties. fact14: There is someone such that if it is horary either it is a paramilitary or it is a thirties or both. fact15: Someone that is not a Insessores is canonist or is a healthfulness or both. fact16: An alert thing collogues cooperativeness and/or features Pierce.
|
UNKNOWN
| 0
| 16
|
|
This nylons is not a Jerusalem.
|
fact1: There is something such that either that is liveried or that ICES Dartmouth or both. fact2: There is something such that it is a Senefelder or it is a misconception or both. fact3: This nylons is not a Jerusalem if there is somebody such that it is a Senefelder or is a misconception or both. fact4: This nylons is a Jerusalem if that lots is a defeated. fact5: This fireguard is inaudible and/or is a worry if that Warner is a Senefelder. fact6: If that lots is a Jerusalem that thing either does ICE Dartmouth or is a establishmentarianism or both. fact7: That this nylons does not shelve mismatched stands. fact8: That lots is a defeated and/or this thing is a Jerusalem if this fireguard is inaudible.
|
fact2 & fact3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 1
| 6
|
That this cymene is classified as a dauntlessness and that person rips does not stand.
|
fact1: This cymene is a dauntlessness. fact2: There is someone such that she/he is Bosnian. fact3: This sensitizer is not a passport and not a trifling. fact4: This cymene does not degrease seediness if a Bosnian thing degrease seediness. fact5: If there is some man such that it is not a passport then this angostura degreases seediness and is Bosnian. fact6: If there is something such that this does not degrease seediness then that jugale rips and this is a dauntlessness. fact7: This cymene rips.
|
fact1 & fact7 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 1
| 5
|
Vasotomy takes place.
|
fact1: Scanning skewness takes place and cytoplasmicness takes place. fact2: Awakening occurs and jaded takes place. fact3: Vasotomy and reclaiming happen. fact4: That that neither reclaiming nor vasotomy take place is right does not hold. fact5: Fluoroscopy happens. fact6: Contemplation occurs.
|
fact3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 1
| 5
|
This hessian collies and does speak.
|
fact1: If somebody does not seethe this hessian speaks. fact2: This hessian seethes. fact3: There is something such that that it does colly and it seethes is not correct. fact4: Faisal is bismuthic or it is not aeromechanic or both if that Faisal is not a Xanthorrhoeaceae holds. fact5: If there is something such that it is not a landed that that convalescent is a Xanthorrhoeaceae is true. fact6: This hessian is a Xanthorrhoeaceae if there is somebody such that this one does not colly. fact7: If there is something such that that that thing is a Xanthorrhoeaceae and seethes is wrong this hessian does speak. fact8: This hessian is a Xanthorrhoeaceae if that elbow speaks. fact9: Faisal does Father Peloponnese. fact10: That convalescent is not a landed. fact11: That Faisal is a landed and it does colly is false if there is something such that it is not a Xanthorrhoeaceae. fact12: There is some man such that he is a Xanthorrhoeaceae and seethes. fact13: The fact that that Faisal is a Xanthorrhoeaceae and this thing does seethe is incorrect if there is something such that this thing is not a landed is correct. fact14: This hessian does colly. fact15: If Faisal is not aeromechanic this hessian is a Xanthorrhoeaceae. fact16: This hessian is a Xanthorrhoeaceae if Faisal is bismuthic. fact17: If there is something such that it is not a landed the statement that Faisal collies and is a Xanthorrhoeaceae does not hold. fact18: This hessian is not a smallpox. fact19: That Shanna collies is valid. fact20: If some person is not a landed then that convalescent does colly. fact21: There is someone such that it is a landed. fact22: If the fact that Faisal does not seethe is valid that elbow is a Xanthorrhoeaceae or it speaks or both.
|
fact10 -> int1: There is something such that that it is not a landed is true.; int1 & fact13 -> int2: The claim that Faisal is a Xanthorrhoeaceae and that seethes is not correct.; int2 -> int3: There is some person such that that he/she is a Xanthorrhoeaceae and seethes does not stand.; int3 & fact7 -> int4: This hessian does speak.; int4 & fact14 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 5
| 18
|
That that either favourableness occurs or bichromatedness does not happens or both is incorrect stands.
|
fact1: Wattling Giraffa occurs and/or premiership does not takes place. fact2: Lockup brings about that drum and/or pureness occurs. fact3: Favourableness happens or bichromatedness happens or both. fact4: Bichromatedness does not occurs. fact5: Bichromatedness is brought about by progression. fact6: Drum prevents non-favourableness. fact7: Expelling incompatibility does not takes place. fact8: Probableness does not happens. fact9: That the statement that lockup does not takes place and progression does not takes place is false is right.
|
fact4 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 1
| 8
|
That that samovar is not a faultlessness and/or it is not a plonk is invalid.
|
fact1: This tinker is interlocutory and fashionable.
|
UNKNOWN
| 0
| 1
|
|
The fact that all persons do not put Qatar and are not lamentings is wrong.
|
fact1: Everything is not a Psyllidae and it is unsmooth. fact2: Everything does not put Qatar. fact3: All ones do not put Qatar and they are not lamentings. fact4: That everything is not a simian is not false. fact5: Everything is not interdepartmental and that is not a Lydian.
|
fact3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 0
| 4
|
Unconstitutionalness does not happens.
|
fact1: That busting AAA does not happens is triggered by that downshift does not occurs. fact2: Inscriptiveness occurs. fact3: Either moralness happens or mailing does not occurs or both if overworking does not takes place. fact4: That overworking happens and swim occurs is not true. fact5: That busting AAA does not takes place and noosing Lagomorpha does not occurs does not hold. fact6: Constitutionalness prevents downshift. fact7: Underlying Fosbury occurs. fact8: Titularness takes place. fact9: Clearness occurs. fact10: That moralness does not takes place is correct. fact11: Conflagrating transitiveness takes place. fact12: Mailing takes place and/or noosing Lagomorpha does not happens. fact13: Unconstitutionalness occurs. fact14: Oncologicalness takes place. fact15: Columnedness occurs. fact16: Examination happens. fact17: Autoplasticness takes place. fact18: Clothing Dendrocolaptidae takes place. fact19: Fit happens.
|
fact13 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 0
| 18
|
That underlayment is not unflattering and the person does not diagram rococo.
|
fact1: That underlayment is not a research if there is something such that the proposition that it is a halfpenny and it is a research does not stand. fact2: This essayer is a halfpenny if that is not a Cuterebra. fact3: This essayer is not a Cuterebra or non-splayfoot or both if the overcasting is a Spica. fact4: If the overcasting is a crassitude this essayer is a halfpenny. fact5: There is nothing that is both a halfpenny and a research. fact6: That the overcasting is a crassitude or is a Spica or both is right. fact7: That underlayment is not unflattering.
|
UNKNOWN
| 0
| 7
|
|
Screwup occurs.
|
fact1: Non-operaticness is brought about by that amble does not takes place. fact2: Non-alkalicness and/or non-maturedness occurs. fact3: That ebbing does not takes place prevents unargumentativeness. fact4: Screwup occurs if alkalicness does not occurs. fact5: Either non-alkalicness or non-argumentativeness or both takes place. fact6: Discomfiting pruritus does not occurs but maturedness takes place. fact7: Either campaigning payroll happens or amble occurs or both. fact8: Discomfiting pruritus does not occurs. fact9: Ebbing does not happens and/or amble does not happens. fact10: Non-discombobulatedness and sousing happen.
|
fact6 -> int1: Maturedness occurs.; int1 -> int2: Screwup or maturedness or both takes place.; int2 -> int3: Maturedness takes place and/or screwup occurs.; int3 -> int4: If maturedness does not happens screwup happens.; int4 & fact2 & fact4 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 5
| 7
|
There is someone such that if it is not a Acre then it is either not parental or not a OIS or both.
|
fact1: There is somebody such that if that he is a gutsiness is right either he is not a Heimdall or he is apologetic or both. fact2: There exists something such that if it is humbled that it does not disillusion Cleistes or it does not bawl vi or both is right. fact3: There is some person such that if it does not post Mister then either it is not a Luxemburger or it is not a bookclub or both. fact4: This pentaerythritol is not a OIS or not a probe or both if that it is not a fantasia stands. fact5: Acres are not parental or are not OISES or both. fact6: Either someone is not parental or it is a OIS or both if the fact that it is not a Acre is right. fact7: There is someone such that if that he is not a Hinduism is right he is not a kind of a cytology or he stargazes or both. fact8: There is something such that if it is not a Afghan then it is not social or is pictographic or both. fact9: Something either is irreverent or does rasp necromania or both if it is not a positiveness. fact10: If this forward is not a Acre then the person is not parental or a OIS or both. fact11: There is something such that if it is a Abudefduf then the proposition that it is not mononuclear or is not an acantha or both is true. fact12: That trepan is not unacquisitive or that one is not exodontic or both if that one is a kind of a OIS. fact13: A non-chronological one is not a Scolytus or does not aid Puccinia or both. fact14: All non-artiodactyl men are Abudefdufs or are not a kind of braideds or both. fact15: Something that is a climacteric does not hygienize Caryophyllales and/or is not totipotent. fact16: If somebody is not a Acre that one is not parental or that one is not a OIS or both. fact17: This filago is not a Afghan or not White or both if it is not exodontic.
|
fact16 -> int1: That either this forward is not parental or it is not a OIS or both is not false if this forward is not a Acre.; int1 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 2
| 16
|
The fact that acneiformness occurs and misappropriation occurs is not correct.
|
fact1: Shears and ruggedness happen. fact2: Misappropriation takes place. fact3: If acneiformness takes place parasympatheticness does not occurs or seasonableness does not happens or both. fact4: Acneiformness or fruitage or both happens. fact5: Forcipateness and boring take place. fact6: Acneiformness takes place. fact7: Carotidness and boytroseness happen.
|
fact2 & fact6 -> int1: Misappropriation happens and acneiformness takes place.; int1 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 2
| 5
|
Investing M3 takes place.
|
fact1: Finnishness does not takes place. fact2: Non-Finnishness and faltering Quebec occur. fact3: Mystic takes place. fact4: The fact that faltering Quebec but not investing M3 happens is incorrect. fact5: Servileness does not happens.
|
fact2 -> int1: Faltering Quebec takes place.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that investing M3 does not occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: That faltering Quebec occurs but investing M3 does not takes place is right.; int2 & fact4 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 5
| 3
|
The fact that that denoting Anguis and/or matutinalness happens is not wrong does not hold.
|
fact1: Matutinalness does not takes place or denoting Anguis does not occurs or both. fact2: Bargaining hectogram does not happens. fact3: Knelling does not takes place. fact4: Disbarment does not happens. fact5: Either Reconstruction takes place or faulting occurs or both if matutinalness does not takes place. fact6: Reentrantness is prevented by Reconstruction. fact7: Transforming occurs. fact8: Epiphany does not takes place and biffing synonym does not occurs. fact9: Stuffing and/or dishonestness happens. fact10: Glamourisation takes place and/or klondike occurs. fact11: Denoting Anguis does not happens. fact12: Matutinalness happens. fact13: The claim that postmortem takes place but progress does not occurs is wrong.
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that denoting Anguis does not happens and matutinalness does not happens.; assump1 -> int1: Matutinalness does not occurs.; int1 & fact12 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: The statement that neither denoting Anguis happens nor matutinalness takes place is false.; int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 5
| 12
|
That there is something such that that it does not confound Cocteau and is a kind of a tuppence does not hold is invalid.
|
fact1: This lutanist confounds Cocteau. fact2: the Cocteau confounds lutanist.
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that this lutanist does not confound Cocteau and is a tuppence.; assump1 -> int1: This lutanist does not confound Cocteau.; int1 & fact1 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: That this lutanist does not confound Cocteau and is a tuppence does not hold.; int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 5
| 1
|
Substantialness does not takes place and exhilarating crossbones does not takes place.
|
fact1: Non-noncollapsibleness and stain happen. fact2: Searching Watson does not occurs. fact3: Magnetising ironed takes place or killing wizardry takes place or both. fact4: That devolution takes place holds. fact5: Sotho does not occurs. fact6: Aramaicness does not takes place and interrupting coronach does not takes place. fact7: Substantialness takes place and/or subleasing razzle does not takes place. fact8: That not subleasing razzle but substantialness occurs is invalid. fact9: Sanding disquietude does not takes place. fact10: That not jabbing but ultramicroscopicness happens is false. fact11: Mariticide does not happens. fact12: Pyloricness does not happens. fact13: That working does not takes place is right. fact14: Subleasing razzle does not happens. fact15: The fact that loaning Gesneriaceae does not takes place and subsidence takes place does not stand. fact16: If substantialness takes place exhilarating crossbones or overclouding felicitousness or both happens. fact17: That exhilarating crossbones does not takes place holds. fact18: Veneration does not happens. fact19: Clopping does not occurs.
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that substantialness takes place.; fact14 & assump1 -> int1: Not subleasing razzle but substantialness occurs.; int1 & fact8 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: Substantialness does not takes place.; int3 & fact17 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 5
| 16
|
That harrowing royalty and associationalness take place does not hold.
|
fact1: Conditioning does not takes place. fact2: Eupneicness does not takes place but associationalness happens. fact3: Harrowing royalty occurs. fact4: Eupneicness does not happens. fact5: That reconverting occurs stands. fact6: Not unfreezing invoice but brachycephalic occurs.
|
fact2 -> int1: The claim that associationalness happens stands.; int1 & fact3 -> int2: That associationalness takes place and harrowing royalty occurs holds.; int2 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 3
| 4
|
This Ac divides Cetoniidae.
|
fact1: This Ac is apothegmatical. fact2: This Ac is a ravenousness. fact3: This sniveling is both not a potful and a Hymenomycetes if somebody marginalises Annelida. fact4: This Burgess divides Cetoniidae. fact5: Every man divides Cetoniidae. fact6: The epicardium divides Cetoniidae. fact7: This sniveling either is cytophotometric or is a potful or both. fact8: The roughleg divides Cetoniidae. fact9: This Ac is Shinto. fact10: That wallflower divides Cetoniidae. fact11: This Ac is anterograde. fact12: That every man does not marginalise Annelida does not hold. fact13: The drop does divide Cetoniidae. fact14: This Ac is curious. fact15: This Ac does derive gynecology. fact16: The descendent divides Cetoniidae. fact17: If the fact that there is someone such that it is not a potful is valid then the Anthozoa divides Cetoniidae and is a potful. fact18: All things are dishonours. fact19: Everything is irreducible. fact20: The lychgate divides Cetoniidae.
|
fact5 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 1
| 19
|
That shrinkableness takes place and womanliness happens does not hold.
|
fact1: Viviparousness occurs. fact2: Cobbling yields non-bivalvedness or that unfastening Antigua does not occurs or both. fact3: Muffling takes place or paleoanthropologicalness happens or both. fact4: Womanliness happens. fact5: Shrinkableness happens or cobbling does not happens or both. fact6: That cobbling does not occurs prevents that muffling does not occurs. fact7: Quadrangularness and rekindling take place. fact8: Muffling does not occurs or paleoanthropologicalness takes place or both. fact9: Plumbicness and/or non-paleoanthropologicalness takes place.
|
UNKNOWN
| 0
| 8
|
|
Boustrophedonicness does not occurs.
|
fact1: That contempt does not takes place is caused by that parking does not occurs. fact2: Clyster or financing or both occurs. fact3: That contempt occurs and/or elaboration does not takes place is right. fact4: Weightlift takes place and/or elaboration takes place. fact5: That clyster does not happens is brought about by non-submissiveness. fact6: That financing does not occurs brings about that weightlift does not happens. fact7: Non-submissiveness is prevented by that spattering does not occurs. fact8: That deflation takes place does not hold. fact9: That spattering takes place is valid. fact10: Submissiveness triggers that parking does not occurs.
|
UNKNOWN
| 0
| 10
|
|
Let's assume that reconsidering Pulmonata does not occurs and dialectalness does not happens.
|
fact1: The fact that bolting does not occurs is correct. fact2: That reconsidering Pulmonata but not dialectalness occurs does not hold. fact3: That both non-saltyness and non-avitaminoticness happen does not stand. fact4: Perfected happens. fact5: Orienting sabin does not happens. fact6: Purposing does not occurs and napoleon does not takes place. fact7: That Curbing gnosis occurs is right. fact8: Dialectalness takes place. fact9: That that not reconsidering Pulmonata but dialectalness occurs is not false is false. fact10: That monotheisticness does not happens and payback does not happens is incorrect. fact11: Lodgingsing slightness does not takes place and flowage does not happens.
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that reconsidering Pulmonata does not occurs and dialectalness does not happens.; assump1 -> int1: Dialectalness does not occurs.; int1 & fact8 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 4
| 10
|
That there exists someone such that that it is not a cesarean and does not countermine is incorrect is false.
|
fact1: There is something such that that that thing is not a cesarean and that thing countermines is invalid. fact2: The claim that that SUV countermines is correct.
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that SUV is not a cesarean and does not countermine.; assump1 -> int1: That SUV does not countermine.; int1 & fact2 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: That that SUV is not a cesarean and does not countermine is incorrect.; int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 5
| 1
|
That some person is adenocarcinomatous is false.
|
fact1: This pinocytosis does not Hale Pidlimdi and does not brew. fact2: The fact that that Pashtoon is anthropogenetic but it is not unmanageable is false. fact3: That Valentina does hoard acrocyanosis but it is not adenocarcinomatous does not stand. fact4: Valentina hoards acrocyanosis. fact5: This pee hoards acrocyanosis if there is someone such that that the fact that either it is not adenocarcinomatous or it does hoards acrocyanosis or both holds does not hold. fact6: Valentina does not embrace syndicate. fact7: this acrocyanosis hoards Valentina. fact8: That tick does hoard acrocyanosis and this does Hale Pidlimdi if there is something such that this does not Hale Pidlimdi.
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that Valentina is not adenocarcinomatous is right.; fact4 & assump1 -> int1: Valentina hoards acrocyanosis but this one is not adenocarcinomatous.; int1 & fact3 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: Valentina is adenocarcinomatous.; int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 5
| 6
|
There is something such that the statement that it does not content multinomial and it is lasting does not hold.
|
fact1: This Tatar is lasting. fact2: That this congealment is not Mesozoic and/or is lasting is incorrect if there is some person such that she/he contents multinomial. fact3: Something does not content multinomial but it is lasting. fact4: That Mirian is not wintry and it does not coarseness hardihood does not stand if there is something such that it does think Zukerman. fact5: Some person thinks Zukerman. fact6: This fantasist is Mesozoic if there is something such that that that thing is not Mesozoic or that thing is lasting or both is incorrect. fact7: That this fantasist contents multinomial and that one is lasting does not hold. fact8: There is someone such that that it contents multinomial and is lasting is wrong. fact9: This fantasist does not content multinomial. fact10: This fantasist is a azotaemia. fact11: This fantasist is not lasting. fact12: This RH is minuscular and is not wintry.
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that this fantasist does not content multinomial but it is lasting.; assump1 -> int1: This fantasist is lasting.; int1 & fact11 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: That this fantasist does not content multinomial but this one is lasting is not valid.; int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 5
| 11
|
That tach does not forest preciseness or demises Ammodytidae or both.
|
fact1: Either that californium does not forest preciseness or it splinters unconfessed or both. fact2: All things forest preciseness and/or demise Ammodytidae. fact3: Every person does not reduce Lyginopteris or is bacterioidal or both. fact4: Every person does not recapitulate experienced or the person is fecal or both. fact5: Either that tach does not animadvert nephropathy or it forests preciseness or both. fact6: Either that tach is not Islamic or it demises Ammodytidae or both. fact7: Either the gingersnap does not stream Ajaia or it is a totipotency or both. fact8: This moonfish is acetylic. fact9: That tach does not forest preciseness and/or does botch pomaded. fact10: That tach does not demise Ammodytidae and/or this is a Macao. fact11: That tach is not a boom or he botches pomaded or both. fact12: That tach forests preciseness or demises Ammodytidae or both. fact13: Either that actiniarian is not antitumour or the person demises Ammodytidae or both. fact14: Either all things are not Macaos or these things are subsonic or both. fact15: Everything does not swarm and/or it divides. fact16: All things are either not TSAS or arborous or both. fact17: Either that tach is not a kind of a Mikania or it demises Ammodytidae or both. fact18: Either all things are not subsonic or they extend or both. fact19: Everything is not a steep and/or that thing is valuable.
|
UNKNOWN
| 0
| 19
|
|
The claim that there is someone such that if it wears then it is not a Gallinula is incorrect.
|
fact1: There is something such that if it is unheeding it does not plead harnessed. fact2: If that rangeland is downstairs that rangeland is a Gallinula. fact3: If someone gasconades leftism then the one either wears or does not combine cotan or both. fact4: All ones combine cotan. fact5: If that that rangeland does kidnap inculpability is right he/she is not classified as a Gallinula. fact6: That rangeland is a Gallinula if that one wears. fact7: If that rangeland wears this thing is not a Gallinula. fact8: There is some man such that if that person enlists then that person is a Gretzky. fact9: There is some person such that if it wears then it is a Gallinula.
|
fact7 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 1
| 8
|
Spectroscopicness does not takes place.
|
fact1: Toping Ontario is caused by that xerography occurs. fact2: Embarkation occurs. fact3: Xerography is triggered by that toping Ontario does not occurs. fact4: Oozing does not occurs. fact5: That historiography does not takes place is caused by dependentness. fact6: Allying waveband occurs. fact7: Toping Ontario occurs. fact8: Anagogicness occurs. fact9: Both toping Ontario and non-spectroscopicness occur. fact10: If adductinging takes place then downswing occurs and/or untrimmedness takes place. fact11: Crinkling peeve or adductinging or both happens. fact12: Pitchforking Liliidae happens but scores does not occurs. fact13: If historiography does not happens then crinkling peeve does not takes place. fact14: Summarising dotted occurs. fact15: Xerography is triggered by downswing. fact16: Historiography and/or adductinging happens. fact17: Xerography does not takes place and/or historiography does not happens. fact18: That campfire does not happens is not false. fact19: Dependentness and/or blackmailing happens if spectroscopicness does not occurs. fact20: Untrimmedness does not occurs.
|
fact9 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 1
| 19
|
That there is somebody such that it is continuous and/or it is a Chelifer does not hold.
|
fact1: The glume is a Assam. fact2: This bawdyhouse either idealises hoodooism or does rove tiered or both. fact3: If there is something such that the thing is a Assam then that Portuguese is not a reasonableness and the thing is not aetiological. fact4: This streak is a reasonableness if a Chelifer is not a reasonableness. fact5: All things are continuous. fact6: All people are glottochronological. fact7: This graticule is unenrgetic and it jeers rational. fact8: All men are Bourgognes or they are directed or both.
|
fact5 -> int1: That the X is continuous is correct.; int1 -> int2: The X is continuous and/or this person is a Chelifer.; int2 -> int3: Either all ones are not discontinuous or those persons are Chelifers or both.; int3 -> int4: That Portuguese is continuous and/or it is a Chelifer.; int4 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 5
| 7
|
That that shawl is a Devanagari and he/she is a Ignatius does not hold.
|
fact1: This accompanyist is not a Devanagari if this throughput is not Skinnerian. fact2: This axon is a Devanagari. fact3: That there is nothing such that it does not decollate disquietude and it does not oversupply Daubentoniidae does not hold. fact4: That shawl is a Ignatius. fact5: Some person that does not oversupply Daubentoniidae is monoclinic. fact6: Something does not draught Daubentonia and/or it does not tone if it is monoclinic. fact7: Something does not bombilate Vaccaria and/or is not Skinnerian if that it does not draught Daubentonia is valid. fact8: That that shawl is a Otus stands. fact9: Some man is not unperplexed if she/he decollates disquietude. fact10: The auxiliary is alchemical and it is a Ignatius. fact11: Everyone does not oversupply Daubentoniidae and/or the one decollates disquietude. fact12: That shawl is a Devanagari. fact13: If some man that does not decollate disquietude does not oversupply Daubentoniidae then that shawl is not unperplexed. fact14: If there is something such that it is not unperplexed then this coachwhip is a Ignatius and it is monoclinic. fact15: This accompanyist is not a Devanagari if this throughput does not bombilate Vaccaria. fact16: That if this throughput does not tone either this throughput is exegetic or that engilds Eumeces or both is valid.
|
fact12 & fact4 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 1
| 14
|
Let's assume that this sugar is a Bhutanese.
|
fact1: This hypochlorite is a Marini and/or is a pharmaceutical if it is intertidal. fact2: This sugar is a megacardia. fact3: This sugar bays amphictyony and is not circulatory. fact4: If this hypochlorite is a Marini this sugar is intertidal. fact5: This sugar is not a kind of a MALS. fact6: This sugar is a sudorific and/or it is a Acorus if that Lidocaine is a Koch. fact7: That this sugar is not non-intertidal holds if that Lidocaine is not non-intertidal. fact8: That breakwater is a Bhutanese. fact9: If something is a sudorific it is intertidal. fact10: If that Lidocaine is not a Bhutanese that that Lidocaine is a Koch and/or the thing is a main is right. fact11: This sugar is intertidal but this thing is not a EiB. fact12: This sugar is intertidal. fact13: Either this hypochlorite is intertidal or it becomes Doryopteris or both if this sugar is a Acorus. fact14: That this sugar is not a EiB but it is a Bhutanese is invalid. fact15: There is somebody such that it is categorized as a main. fact16: This sugar is a kind of a inerrancy but it does not confound.
|
fact11 -> int1: This sugar is not a EiB.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that this sugar is a Bhutanese.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: This sugar is both not a EiB and a Bhutanese.; int2 & fact14 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 5
| 14
|
Equalness occurs and paralyticness happens.
|
fact1: Equalness and/or paralyticness takes place. fact2: That silencing takes place is correct. fact3: Sailplaning and giving DM occur. fact4: Sprinkle and biquadraticness happen. fact5: Paralyticness happens. fact6: That the fact that neither paralyticness happens nor equalness takes place is valid does not hold. fact7: Diagnosticness occurs. fact8: Guarding Zarqa takes place. fact9: Discerning inkblot occurs.
|
UNKNOWN
| 0
| 8
|
|
Let's assume that symbolism does not happens.
|
fact1: The proposition that symbolism does not happens and orchotomy takes place does not stand. fact2: Repeating does not occurs or denigrating Turgot takes place or both. fact3: Arrogance results in orchotomy. fact4: Non-Darwinianness and/or arrogance occurs. fact5: That coggling occurs results in that either hitting octameter or arrogance or both occurs. fact6: Either repeating happens or coggling occurs or both. fact7: Both orchotomy and denigrating Turgot occur. fact8: Denigrating Turgot takes place. fact9: Hitting octameter does not takes place. fact10: Upraising Landsteiner does not occurs. fact11: Denigrating Turgot and naziness take place. fact12: The proposition that gobbling Conoclinium does not occurs or denigrating Turgot does not occurs or both does not stand. fact13: That orchotomy does not takes place is prevented by hitting octameter.
|
fact7 -> int1: Orchotomy occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that symbolism does not happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: Not symbolism but orchotomy occurs.; int2 & fact1 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 5
| 11
|
Purr and schematizing Lombardia happen.
|
fact1: Baiting suprematism takes place. fact2: Prostaticness happens. fact3: Sloganeeringing happens. fact4: That spattering does not happens prevents that karate does not takes place. fact5: That untalentedness happens holds. fact6: The proposition that karate and emending positivism occur does not hold. fact7: Chiromanticness does not takes place and/or nilpotentness does not happens if sloganeeringing takes place. fact8: If purr does not happens either multiparousness or tying Telescopium or both occurs. fact9: Emending positivism takes place. fact10: Unfairness happens and multiparousness happens. fact11: Flypast and tying Telescopium take place. fact12: That nilpotentness does not happens triggers siding absurdness. fact13: Schematizing Lombardia occurs. fact14: Either purifying Mr. does not takes place or emending positivism happens or both. fact15: Purifying Mr. or schematizing Lombardia or both happens. fact16: That multiparousness and/or sloganeeringing takes place is caused by schematizing Lombardia. fact17: Foxing Whitehead takes place. fact18: The fact that sou'easter and melting Wb take place stands. fact19: Chiromanticness and/or siding absurdness takes place. fact20: Purr happens. fact21: Relearning graining and teasing rurality happen. fact22: Rallying Gorgoniacea takes place.
|
fact13 & fact20 -> int1: Schematizing Lombardia occurs and purr occurs.; int1 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 2
| 20
|
This disintegration is not a Tanakh.
|
fact1: That that anapsid does not recoup perplexity but it is a Piperaceae is not true if there is something such that the statement that it is a Tanakh holds. fact2: That if that something is not pyrographic stands then that does not recoup perplexity stands. fact3: That that anapsid is a Clichy and it is pubic is false. fact4: This Viola illuminates Timor and does extol. fact5: That anapsid does not recoup perplexity if that anapsid is not a Lambertia. fact6: That anapsid does not recoup perplexity but the thing is a Piperaceae. fact7: This vitality is a Piperaceae and/or it is not noncontroversial if there is some man such that it illuminates Timor. fact8: There is something such that the fact that it is not a national and it does not recoup perplexity does not stand. fact9: That that anapsid does not recoup perplexity but that one is a Tanakh does not stand. fact10: This disintegration does not recoup perplexity. fact11: That anapsid is non-pyrographic and/or it is not a Lambertia if this vitality is a Piperaceae. fact12: The minicab is both not a Potamogetonaceae and a Aar.
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that this disintegration is a Tanakh.; assump1 -> int1: There is somebody such that he is a Tanakh.; int1 & fact1 -> int2: That that anapsid does not recoup perplexity but it is a Piperaceae does not stand.; int2 & fact6 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 5
| 10
|
Both legislation and slithering occur.
|
fact1: That not legislation but utilisation takes place is invalid. fact2: Both non-myoticness and riffle happen. fact3: Legislation does not happens or invertebrate occurs or both. fact4: Sisterlikeness does not takes place and/or condylarness happens. fact5: Both punctuation and disengagement happen. fact6: Sisterlikeness takes place if invertebrate happens. fact7: Sallowing jobbery takes place. fact8: The proposition that both patronizedness and chondrifying decorousness occur is invalid. fact9: Decrease occurs. fact10: Non-condylarness is brought about by that comparing occurs. fact11: Polyphonicness does not occurs or slithering does not occurs or both if utilisation occurs. fact12: That not bitchery but bore takes place does not hold. fact13: Slithering happens. fact14: That undemonstrativeness does not takes place but beading impeachment occurs is not true. fact15: Downturn happens. fact16: Utilisation occurs. fact17: Acquiring Lycophyta does not occurs but aneurysmaticness takes place. fact18: That wrongdoing does not takes place prevents that comparing does not happens. fact19: Romany does not happens.
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that legislation does not takes place.; assump1 & fact16 -> int1: Not legislation but utilisation happens.; int1 & fact1 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: Legislation takes place.; int3 & fact13 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 5
| 16
|
Both ablating and woodwork happen.
|
fact1: Claiming autoimmunity occurs and slurping rowdiness takes place. fact2: Woodwork occurs. fact3: Gale takes place. fact4: Ablating happens.
|
fact2 & fact4 -> int1: Woodwork occurs and ablating happens.; int1 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 2
| 2
|
That both representation and immobileness happen does not stand.
|
fact1: Nullification takes place. fact2: If piercing Bristol takes place creoleness happens. fact3: If internationalization does not occurs either amnios does not occurs or legislatorship does not happens or both. fact4: Either piercing Bristol occurs or candidature does not occurs or both. fact5: Internationalization is prevented by non-dispensableness. fact6: Both nullification and immobileness happen. fact7: If squishing happens internationalization does not occurs. fact8: Gerontologicalness does not occurs and/or internationalization does not happens. fact9: That squishing takes place or dispensableness does not happens or both is right if stifling does not occurs. fact10: If amnios does not happens then Grenadianness does not takes place. fact11: Representation takes place. fact12: Consummating is triggered by that nullification does not happens. fact13: Extrapolating Chirocephalus and circularising perinatology occur. fact14: Friction is prevented by traceableness. fact15: That candidature does not takes place is prevented by quieting. fact16: That consummating does not takes place or almsgiving does not occurs or both holds. fact17: That creoleness happens yields that immobileness takes place. fact18: The statement that either Frosting pharma or traceableness or both occurs is not incorrect. fact19: Almsgiving occurs and/or Frosting pharma does not occurs. fact20: That representation does not takes place results in either gerontologicalness or that stifling does not occurs or both. fact21: That legislatorship does not occurs brings about non-Grenadianness. fact22: Grenadianness takes place and/or friction occurs.
|
fact6 -> int1: Immobileness happens.; int1 & fact11 -> int2: Both immobileness and representation take place.; int2 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 3
| 20
|
The fact that this pluralist either drags Hyperborean or does housebreak Kerouac or both is not valid.
|
fact1: This pluralist drags Hyperborean if this inertia is a Capsidae. fact2: That if this pluralist is physiotherapeutic then this inertia housebreaks Kerouac stands. fact3: That that thioguanine is not fibrocartilaginous stands if this holothurian is classic. fact4: That thioguanine is non-fibrocartilaginous if that thioguanine is regulated. fact5: Some person that cane urarthritis does ponder Thlaspi or is not Glaswegian or both. fact6: If someone is not a Surya the person is quincentennial and/or the person is not a cloture. fact7: That the tapa is a Capsidae is valid. fact8: The claim that this pluralist drags Hyperborean is correct if the fact that this inertia is physiotherapeutic stands. fact9: Something that ponders Thlaspi is non-fibrocartilaginous. fact10: If this nerve is a Bremerhaven then that thioguanine canes urarthritis and/or it is not unregulated. fact11: This inertia is physiotherapeutic and/or she is a Capsidae. fact12: If there exists something such that it is not non-fibrocartilaginous this inertia does drag Hyperborean and it does housebreak Kerouac. fact13: This holothurian is classic and/or it is not a Surya if this nerve is non-synesthetic. fact14: Some person is not fibrocartilaginous if it is not Glaswegian. fact15: This inertia is a Capsidae or it housebreaks Kerouac or both. fact16: This pluralist is a Capsidae and/or housebreaks Kerouac. fact17: This pluralist does housebreak Kerouac or is a Capsidae or both. fact18: If this inertia drags Hyperborean this pluralist is physiotherapeutic. fact19: Everything is a Bremerhaven and/or it is not synesthetic. fact20: This pluralist is not non-physiotherapeutic and/or this drags Hyperborean. fact21: That thioguanine is fibrocartilaginous. fact22: This inertia housebreaks Kerouac and/or it is a Capsidae.
|
fact11 & fact8 & fact1 -> int1: This pluralist drags Hyperborean.; int1 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 2
| 19
|
Neither kicking SA nor rounding take place.
|
fact1: Neither banging happens nor inhibition happens. fact2: That kicking SA takes place causes obliging ache. fact3: The claim that rounding and non-aeroliticness take place does not hold. fact4: Kicking SA does not takes place. fact5: Physiotherapy does not occurs. fact6: Exalting prognathism does not happens and ringing does not takes place.
|
UNKNOWN
| 0
| 4
|
|
Autolyticness and bombing occur.
|
fact1: Vaporisation but not unfinishedness occurs. fact2: That autolyticness does not occurs and bombing does not happens is false. fact3: Niceneness happens. fact4: Vaporisation and provocativeness happen. fact5: Autolyticness takes place.
|
UNKNOWN
| 0
| 4
|
|
That basting occurs and intermediateness occurs does not stand.
|
fact1: Intermediateness occurs. fact2: The statement that basting occurs is right. fact3: Either trampling or soiled or both happens.
|
fact1 & fact2 -> int1: Intermediateness happens and basting occurs.; int1 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 2
| 1
|
All men carbonate Hexapoda and are not antitumor.
|
fact1: All things campaign and they are not unreceptive. fact2: All things are both Eurocentric and not impunities. fact3: All things are not albuminuric and they are not Ribeses. fact4: Every man is a hazardousness and it does not smother Chilopoda. fact5: Everything is longer and that thing is not untimbered. fact6: All things are Kimberleys and they are not nonpartizans. fact7: Everything is a leucopenia. fact8: All ones are Bridgetowns that do not orb. fact9: All men carbonate Hexapoda and are not antitumor. fact10: All things are not antitumor. fact11: All ones are uncrystallized and these persons are not voxes. fact12: Every person is unenlightened and is not a sufferance.
|
fact9 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 0
| 11
|
That that there exists something such that if that the thing is not pyknotic stands the thing proves earnings is correct is incorrect.
|
fact1: All non-pyknotic ones do not prove earnings or are not Newgates or both. fact2: If something does not prove earnings then that is undescriptive or a Gyrinidae or both. fact3: All things are not Audenesque or invoke or both. fact4: All things either are not Gyrinidaes or do invoke or both. fact5: There is somebody such that if the person is not a wampumpeag the person is artistic. fact6: If that this myeline is not pyknotic holds then it proves earnings. fact7: There is something such that if it is not a kind of a tweak it is a trinity. fact8: There is some man such that if it does not silence Lorre then it knows woodenness. fact9: If something is a Apterygidae then it shambles blended or it is a credulousness or both. fact10: This fellow drives anticipation if this fellow is not pyknotic. fact11: If this myeline is not non-pyknotic this myeline does prove earnings. fact12: Every person does not shamble blended and/or it invokes. fact13: A undescriptive person either is Audenesque or is a Apterygidae or both. fact14: All things are Newgates. fact15: If somebody does not publish Abilene this one is not pyknotic or this one is not undesigned or both. fact16: Somebody that is a credulousness invokes. fact17: There is something such that if it is pyknotic then it proves earnings. fact18: There is something such that if that it is not a meronym is valid then it lots maidenliness. fact19: That this chiffonier grooves Pediculidae is valid if it does not prove earnings.
|
fact6 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 1
| 18
|
That there is somebody such that that that the one does not spread and is scurfy is correct does not hold is invalid.
|
fact1: That Emmentaler is not a welsh but it is a Hylocichla. fact2: If something is unregenerated then this ameloblast does not wreck sectionalism and it is not unregenerated. fact3: That Emmentaler is scurfy. fact4: There is something such that the thing does not spread and is scurfy. fact5: If there is someone such that it is uninstructive the fact that that Emmentaler either is not scurfy or is not uninstructive or both does not hold. fact6: The constellation is not informative and it does not spread if there is something such that it does not wreck sectionalism. fact7: Something is unregenerated. fact8: That Emmentaler spreads.
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that Emmentaler does not spread and is scurfy.; assump1 -> int1: That that Emmentaler does not spread is correct.; int1 & fact8 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: That that Emmentaler does not spread and is scurfy does not stand.; int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 5
| 7
|
Causing happens.
|
fact1: Grooming played prevents that causing does not occurs. fact2: Meaning does not happens and/or causing does not occurs. fact3: That meaning does not happens yields that Transportation or sorrowfulness or both takes place. fact4: If Transportation occurs then interiorising sopping happens. fact5: Meaning leads to causing. fact6: Grooming played and/or meaning occurs. fact7: Areolateness occurs or unacquisitiveness happens or both. fact8: Unimodalness or causing or both occurs.
|
fact6 & fact1 & fact5 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 1
| 5
|
That cohering Sweden or entering strung or both happens is wrong.
|
fact1: The fact that neither precession happens nor developmentalness takes place does not hold. fact2: That cohering Sweden occurs but entering strung does not occurs is invalid. fact3: Looking happens or socializing Changtzu does not occurs or both. fact4: Isometrics happens. fact5: That entering strung happens holds.
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that neither cohering Sweden nor entering strung occur.; assump1 -> int1: Entering strung does not happens.; int1 & fact5 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: The claim that cohering Sweden does not occurs and entering strung does not occurs does not stand.; int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 5
| 4
|
Onymousness happens and flawing Gulo takes place.
|
fact1: Overexertion occurs. fact2: Translation occurs. fact3: MRI happens. fact4: Both slam and untying Comatulidae take place. fact5: Loafing happens. fact6: Blackness and mockery occur. fact7: That neither flawing Gulo takes place nor onymousness happens is incorrect. fact8: Flawing Gulo happens. fact9: Onymousness takes place.
|
fact8 & fact9 -> int1: Flawing Gulo and onymousness occur.; int1 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 2
| 7
|
Let's assume that Offertory takes place.
|
fact1: Either siliceousness happens or drink takes place or both. fact2: The fact that Offertory but not drink occurs does not hold. fact3: Not drink but siliceousness occurs.
|
fact3 -> int1: Drink does not happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that Offertory takes place.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: Offertory happens but drink does not occurs.; int2 & fact2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 5
| 1
|
That tonsillectomy occurs and percolation happens does not hold.
|
fact1: Yemeni occurs. fact2: Tonsillectomy takes place. fact3: Dating happens and dusk happens.
|
UNKNOWN
| 0
| 2
|
|
That both victimizing crinkled and bloodlessness happen does not stand.
|
fact1: That countercharge takes place and/or growl does not happens is correct. fact2: Pasteurianness takes place. fact3: Both raising and bloodlessness happen. fact4: Shriving prevents that growl does not takes place. fact5: Liner is brought about by prevention. fact6: Victimizing crinkled takes place. fact7: If raising does not occurs lindy occurs and/or shriving happens. fact8: If bloodlessness does not takes place then prevention and/or undamagedness occurs. fact9: Countercharge causes that victimizing crinkled takes place. fact10: Shriving prevents that bloodlessness happens. fact11: Both haemalness and grapevine take place. fact12: If lindy occurs then bloodlessness does not occurs. fact13: Raising occurs.
|
fact3 -> int1: Bloodlessness occurs.; int1 & fact6 -> int2: Bloodlessness and victimizing crinkled happen.; int2 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 3
| 11
|
That there is something such that that either it is not a Oecanthus or it does not harrow impreciseness or both is incorrect does not hold.
|
fact1: There is something such that that this is not a Chorizema or this is not a Oecanthus or both is wrong. fact2: That hexapod harrows impreciseness if that amylum is not a Oecanthus. fact3: There is someone such that that the person either is a Oecanthus or does not harrow impreciseness or both does not stand. fact4: There is some person such that he/she captures Australasia. fact5: That hexapod is a Oecanthus if that amylum does not harrow impreciseness. fact6: That amylum is not a Chorizema. fact7: This smelt is a Oecanthus. fact8: If that hexapod is not a kind of a Oecanthus that amylum is a Chorizema. fact9: If that hexapod does not harrow impreciseness then that amylum is a Chorizema. fact10: The Indiana is a Chorizema and this is a pitilessness. fact11: That hexapod is a Bronte. fact12: There is some person such that he either is not a residual or is not dolomitic or both.
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that hexapod is not a Oecanthus and/or it does not harrow impreciseness.; assump1 & fact8 & fact9 -> int1: That amylum is a Chorizema.; int1 & fact6 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: That that hexapod is not a Oecanthus or this person does not harrow impreciseness or both is false.; int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 5
| 9
|
Let's assume that this deadhead is a Agaricaceae or it is non-anosmic or both.
|
fact1: That madhouse does not bake if this deadhead is a hypospadias. fact2: If this deadhead is a Agaricaceae then that that madhouse does not bake stands. fact3: That madhouse bakes. fact4: This dachsie bakes. fact5: This deadhead does not bake if that madhouse is a Agaricaceae. fact6: If this deadhead is not anosmic that madhouse bakes. fact7: That madhouse does not bake if this deadhead is uniovular.
|
UNKNOWN
| 0
| 3
|
|
That frocking Scorsese and monetization take place does not stand.
|
fact1: That frocking Scorsese happens is valid. fact2: Gazumping takes place if jacks does not takes place. fact3: Defining expo and vacuolateness take place. fact4: Monetization takes place if fake does not occurs. fact5: That carjacking resoluteness does not happens prevents that monetization does not takes place. fact6: Fake does not happens and/or carjacking resoluteness does not happens. fact7: Non-tricentennialness and/or non-chelonianness occurs.
|
fact6 & fact4 & fact5 -> int1: That monetization happens is valid.; int1 & fact1 -> int2: Monetization and frocking Scorsese take place.; int2 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 3
| 3
|
Craning meliorism takes place and toughening metaphase takes place.
|
fact1: Investiture happens and comeback takes place. fact2: Either contenting takes place or manifestation does not takes place or both if toughening metaphase happens. fact3: Craning meliorism takes place. fact4: Toughening metaphase takes place. fact5: Contenting leads to that bronchospasm occurs and/or mortifying happens. fact6: Divisibleness takes place. fact7: Toughening metaphase takes place or Craning meliorism occurs or both. fact8: Bronchospasm does not takes place and/or mulcting myriametre occurs. fact9: Managing Vonnegut takes place.
|
fact4 & fact3 -> int1: Both toughening metaphase and Craning meliorism take place.; int1 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 2
| 7
|
That warehousing Dreyfus does not happens and uncomfortableness takes place does not hold.
|
fact1: Nonracialness does not happens. fact2: Canceling lithology is triggered by scaring. fact3: The fact that that neither uncomfortableness happens nor nonracialness takes place does not hold holds. fact4: Scaring occurs or naturalizing does not happens or both. fact5: Warehousing Dreyfus does not occurs.
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that uncomfortableness does not takes place.; assump1 & fact1 -> int1: Uncomfortableness does not takes place and nonracialness does not happens.; int1 & fact3 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: Uncomfortableness occurs.; int3 & fact5 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 5
| 2
|
This stone reclines Diapensiales and does not vacillate clawed.
|
fact1: The taconite reclines Diapensiales and is not a theatrical. fact2: This stone is a anuran. fact3: That this stone is a Cannae stands. fact4: This stone is a kind of postnatal thing that is not a vibe. fact5: This stone is shiny but it does not vacillate clawed. fact6: This stone is both animate and not colorectal. fact7: That the hydride vacillates clawed is true. fact8: That orchestrator does recline Diapensiales. fact9: This withholder is neuromatous and decocts. fact10: This stone reclines Diapensiales and does not vacillate clawed. fact11: If something does not whisper entranced this opiate vacillates clawed but this is not a Shiah. fact12: This spicemill is a cyclopia and does not clothe handbreadth. fact13: The yucca is insatiate but the one does not recline Diapensiales. fact14: This stone decocts but it is not a vibe. fact15: This withholder is biaxial. fact16: This stone does not whisper entranced. fact17: This thimerosal reclines Diapensiales and is not a Doha. fact18: This stone is a Proserpina and not a vibe. fact19: This stone is Kafkaesque and does not steer skirting. fact20: This stone outstays Lovell but it is not a vibe. fact21: The garroter is a reliability but it is not insatiate.
|
fact10 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 0
| 20
|
That moocher does not underquote yatobyo.
|
fact1: This tincture either trounces or is balconied or both if this tincture petitions windburn. fact2: The stakeholder petitions windburn and that person does underquote yatobyo if someone is not aecial. fact3: that windburn petitions tincture. fact4: This tincture petitions windburn. fact5: This tincture observes autographed if there is something such that that that this thing disinvests and this thing is not a itchiness stands does not stand. fact6: Either this tincture petitions windburn or she/he does not underquote yatobyo or both. fact7: If some man that observes autographed petitions windburn then that moocher underquotes yatobyo. fact8: The peach is not aecial. fact9: The proposition that the anesthyl disinvests but that one is not a itchiness does not stand.
|
fact9 -> int1: There is something such that that it disinvests and is not a itchiness is not true.; int1 & fact5 -> int2: This tincture observes autographed.; int2 & fact4 -> int3: This tincture observes autographed and does petition windburn.; int3 -> int4: There is something such that that that does observe autographed and petitions windburn stands.; int4 & fact7 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 5
| 5
|
That chili is not icosahedral.
|
fact1: That chili is not non-icosahedral if something that pitches splenomegaly does containerize adaptability. fact2: That lacewing is a forthcomingness and/or corrupt if there is something such that it cats adamance. fact3: That clon is anestrous. fact4: If that Circus is not a kind of a AAA then this cedarwood does not cache pibroch. fact5: Rosemary is icosahedral and that thing is vertebral if there is something such that that thing does not cache pibroch. fact6: There is something such that it cats adamance. fact7: If that lacewing is not a crenel then this cedarwood does not cache pibroch. fact8: Everything pitches splenomegaly and it is not forceful. fact9: That clon containerizes adaptability. fact10: That clon is non-forceful. fact11: If that lacewing is not a Hagada that Circus bundles chroma and/or she/he is not a AAA. fact12: That lacewing is not a crenel and/or it is not categorized as a Hagada if that lacewing is corrupt. fact13: Everything is not forceful. fact14: that adaptability containerizes clon. fact15: If there is something such that it pitches splenomegaly that chili assays Spielberg and is a chant. fact16: That clon is untucked. fact17: This cedarwood does not cache pibroch if that Circus bundles chroma. fact18: That chili is albinotic and is a kind of a gradual. fact19: If that lacewing is a forthcomingness then this cedarwood does not cache pibroch. fact20: Something is vertebral.
|
fact8 -> int1: That clon pitches splenomegaly and is not forceful.; int1 -> int2: That clon pitches splenomegaly.; int2 & fact9 -> int3: That clon does pitch splenomegaly and it does containerize adaptability.; int3 -> int4: Something pitches splenomegaly and containerizes adaptability.; int4 & fact1 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 5
| 17
|
That ensemble is a Ptyas.
|
fact1: This march is a Ptyas. fact2: That ensemble is not non-Fahrenheit but musicological. fact3: All men are Alpenas and delve. fact4: That ensemble clinks Scombresocidae. fact5: All persons are Christological and they are Alpenas. fact6: If that metopion is not psychoanalytic this stoppage is a Ptyas. fact7: That that ensemble does reload quorum and is a attainability is not wrong. fact8: Everything is a attainability and/or it is a Ptyas. fact9: The macaroon is a attainability. fact10: All ones are not qualified and are Berliozes. fact11: That ensemble is a intransitive and is a attainability. fact12: Everything is a attainability. fact13: Everyone is a kind of a attainability and this person is a Ptyas. fact14: That ensemble lauds meanness. fact15: If that metopion is exaugural that metopion is not psychoanalytic and/or it is not a interestingness. fact16: That ensemble is a attainability. fact17: Every person crystaliseds monosemy and is a Manteidae. fact18: That ensemble is a stooge and not non-warming. fact19: That metopion is exaugural and/or she does modify Strombidae if she is a attainability. fact20: The Canuck is a attainability.
|
fact13 -> int1: That ensemble is a attainability and is a Ptyas.; int1 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 2
| 19
|
That this strainer is a Tevere and/or does stump Yosemite does not hold.
|
fact1: This strainer bails hematuria and/or it is a Cestum. fact2: This percoidean stumps Yosemite. fact3: That this strainer begrimeds Sphenisciformes and/or it quarantines is not incorrect. fact4: If this strainer is anticyclonic then either that Angolan is a comradery or it stumps Yosemite or both. fact5: This strainer is a hiss and/or it stumps Yosemite. fact6: This strainer stumps Yosemite. fact7: Every man either is anticyclonic or is a Tevere or both. fact8: That farina is anticyclonic and this thing is a Mendelssohn. fact9: That heraldry does stump Yosemite if this thing is heavenly. fact10: If that farina balks Scotland then that heraldry is a biometrics or that is heavenly or both. fact11: If that Angolan is a comradery that farina balks Scotland and/or it does not stump Yosemite. fact12: that Yosemite stumps strainer. fact13: This strainer is an unease. fact14: If that heraldry is a biometrics the one stumps Yosemite.
|
fact6 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 1
| 13
|
This Tartar is not a Cumberland.
|
fact1: If this daishiki is not a literalism this tailflower is a Cumberland and/or it is unadventurous. fact2: Something is either a debit or not hipped or both. fact3: Either some person laps or it bells or both. fact4: If there is something such that this owes smothered this Tartar is non-piffling. fact5: There is something such that it is either loose or unadventurous or both. fact6: That the necrophagy is not a pedology stands if there exists something such that either that apprehends or that unfolds or both. fact7: This daishiki is not a kind of a literalism or it is not a Lagos or both if the fact that that saponification does mount synapse stands. fact8: This Tartar does not unfold. fact9: If somebody curses Aphriza and/or it is loose this Tartar does not mount synapse. fact10: This Tartar does not mount synapse. fact11: Some person does unfold or she/he mounts synapse or both. fact12: This Tartar is a Cumberland if this tailflower is a Cumberland. fact13: The statement that something is a Bombacaceae and/or it chips NRO is correct. fact14: If there is some person such that it unfolds and/or it mounts synapse then this Tartar is not a Cumberland. fact15: This Tartar does not mount synapse if something is unexpansive and/or it is a malice.
|
fact11 & fact14 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 1
| 13
|
This clairvoyant is philological.
|
fact1: Somebody that is not a Rocroi is philological. fact2: If there is something such that it is aural this clairvoyant is aural or not a Rocroi or both. fact3: Either that catapult bats roundtable or she/he is not aural or both. fact4: This clairvoyant is aural and/or this thing does not unarm. fact5: Every man is philological or is aural or both. fact6: This clairvoyant is philological if that timekeeper is philological. fact7: All non-aural men are hungry and/or are philological. fact8: A guideline either is not a Rocroi or is not aural or both. fact9: That this clairvoyant is philological is right if that timekeeper latinizes Gettysburg. fact10: An aural thing is not philological. fact11: All hungry things are not geographies. fact12: If somebody is aural then the Tofranil is aural or she does not intrude or both. fact13: If the fact that that timekeeper is a geography is valid then this clairvoyant is philological. fact14: That pistia either is a guideline or is philological or both if this hob is a Rocroi. fact15: This clairvoyant is not a Massasoit if this clairvoyant is a kind of a Rocroi. fact16: The brail is non-aural. fact17: If some person is not a Rocroi the fact that it is not philological is valid. fact18: Something is a Rocroi and/or hungry if the fact that it is aural stands. fact19: There is some man such that the person is aural. fact20: That timekeeper is a geography and/or she/he is philological if she/he vulcanises Gerbillus. fact21: This clairvoyant is philological if this clairvoyant is not a Rocroi. fact22: This clairvoyant entrances Saxegothea and/or it is not incorporeal if that pistia is a guideline. fact23: If this hob is philological then that timekeeper latinizes Gettysburg and/or this thing does vulcanise Gerbillus. fact24: This clairvoyant is not amethystine.
|
fact17 -> int1: If this clairvoyant is not a kind of a Rocroi then this clairvoyant is not philological.; fact19 & fact2 -> int2: This clairvoyant either is aural or is not a Rocroi or both.; fact10 -> int3: This clairvoyant is not philological if he/she is aural.; int1 & int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 4
| 20
|
Jeremy is not a calm or is a Bacteroidaceae or both.
|
fact1: That this spittlebug is not a calm is true if this milt does not retrogress. fact2: This spittlebug is not a calm if this milt is categorized as a permissiveness. fact3: This spittlebug is a Bari. fact4: There is someone such that the one is not non-adjudicative. fact5: A adjudicative thing is a permissiveness or collarless or both. fact6: A collarless thing is not a collapse and/or does not retrogress. fact7: That this spittlebug is a calm is incorrect if this milt is not a collapse. fact8: If a adjudicative thing does blur Hominidae then Jeremy is a Bacteroidaceae. fact9: This spittlebug blurs Hominidae. fact10: the Hominidae blurs spittlebug. fact11: If something is not a Bari then that does not blur Hominidae and/or that does not womanize Liepaja. fact12: This spittlebug is not adjudicative if something that is not a Bacteroidaceae blurs Hominidae. fact13: If there is something such that it is adjudicative this milt is adjudicative and/or it is not a Bari. fact14: This spittlebug is a Bari that is adjudicative.
|
fact14 -> int1: This spittlebug is not non-adjudicative.; int1 & fact9 -> int2: This spittlebug is adjudicative and it blurs Hominidae.; int2 -> int3: That something is adjudicative and it blurs Hominidae is right.; int3 & fact8 -> int4: Jeremy is a Bacteroidaceae.; int4 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 5
| 11
|
Substitution does not happens and phalangealness does not happens.
|
fact1: Inducing Lichtenstein does not takes place. fact2: Sympatricness does not takes place. fact3: Substitution prevents that snitching Grenada does not takes place. fact4: Phalangealness does not happens. fact5: Briskening Polydactylus does not happens. fact6: That phalangealness occurs if the claim that unenforceableness occurs holds holds. fact7: That non-dimness and polishing subclass occur is false. fact8: Sympatricness causes that Hugoesqueness happens and/or unsexeding Prokayotae. fact9: The statement that non-sympatricness and substitution happen does not stand.
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that substitution happens.; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: Sympatricness does not happens but substitution occurs.; int1 & fact9 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: Substitution does not occurs.; int3 & fact4 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 5
| 6
|
That standard occurs and democratization happens is not true.
|
fact1: Forgetfulness happens and undelineatedness does not takes place. fact2: If closingness does not takes place that determinableness happens or Boreas does not occurs or both stands. fact3: That semitropicalness does not happens stands. fact4: Both bedlessness and reseating take place. fact5: That absorbableness does not takes place and standard happens is not right. fact6: That alleviation does not occurs or standard occurs or both is true. fact7: Determinableness does not occurs or democratization does not occurs or both. fact8: Funeral happens. fact9: Absorbableness does not happens and/or closingness happens. fact10: Democratization but not semitropicalness happens. fact11: Both antiquating and non-oceanicness occur. fact12: Directing takes place. fact13: That alleviation happens and/or beating criminology does not happens is correct if the statement that semitropicalness occurs is right. fact14: Juddering happens and Boreas happens. fact15: Standard and absorbableness occur. fact16: Concocting Myrtillocactus happens and funeral occurs. fact17: Absorbableness takes place. fact18: Boding shahadah takes place. fact19: Paperlikeness takes place. fact20: Lamenting radian happens but slanting Buyi does not takes place. fact21: That standard happens is true if beating criminology does not occurs.
|
fact15 -> int1: Standard happens.; fact10 -> int2: Democratization happens.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 3
| 19
|
That antineoplasticness and crackdown occur is false.
|
fact1: That socialising happens and flooding Hominidae takes place does not stand. fact2: Crackdown takes place. fact3: That non-antineoplasticness or Canadianness or both happens is right. fact4: That neither gladdening disgusted happens nor antineoplasticness occurs is incorrect. fact5: Tempering does not happens or serving oersted takes place or both. fact6: Narrowedness does not takes place. fact7: Canadianness triggers flooding Hominidae. fact8: Socialising is brought about by non-clericalness. fact9: Either gladdening disgusted does not happens or infusing happens or both. fact10: The proposition that gladdening disgusted does not happens holds. fact11: If calcifugousness occurs then infusing does not occurs. fact12: Disconnection causes serving oersted. fact13: That crackdown happens and/or tribalness does not occurs is brought about by non-antineoplasticness. fact14: Bobsledding and tetralogy happen. fact15: Crackdown results in that either tempering or disconnection or both happens. fact16: Calcifugousness takes place and/or clericalness does not takes place.
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that antineoplasticness does not takes place.; fact10 & assump1 -> int1: Neither gladdening disgusted happens nor antineoplasticness takes place.; int1 & fact4 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: Antineoplasticness occurs.; int3 & fact2 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 5
| 13
|
This gravestone is not electromagnetic.
|
fact1: If something does not sight horoscopy that this symbolist is not a Arius and/or it is forgetful is false. fact2: If something is not a Montaigne that sulfide is not electromagnetic but the thing is a Montaigne. fact3: That coolie is not classed as a Montaigne. fact4: Everything is either not electromagnetic or not a Arius or both. fact5: This gravestone is not forgetful. fact6: There is something such that it does not sight horoscopy.
|
UNKNOWN
| 0
| 6
|
|
This Micronase is not a Cuzco and/or it is a coefficient.
|
fact1: This Micronase is a coefficient and is a Kabala. fact2: That this Micronase is a Pyrularia is right. fact3: If there is some man such that it is a hypnotic that phonograph is a coefficient and it is a Kabala. fact4: The Quiche is a Kabala. fact5: That phonograph fobs sturdiness or it is a hypnotic or both. fact6: The antimalarial is a coefficient. fact7: The rowan is a Cuzco. fact8: This Micronase is not a ruefulness and/or is a hypnotic. fact9: This Micronase is a Vermeer or it does not fob sturdiness or both if this Micronase is a Kabala. fact10: If something fobs sturdiness it is a Kabala. fact11: That the hypanthium is a coefficient holds. fact12: This Micronase is a Cuzco and/or is a coefficient. fact13: The beads fobs sturdiness and that is a hypnotic. fact14: That lithium does not turn Canavalia and/or is aetiologic. fact15: This Micronase does not turn Canavalia and/or is discriminatory. fact16: This Micronase is a grilled. fact17: That this Micronase lours NAWCWPNS is true. fact18: This Micronase is a Kabala. fact19: There is nobody such that the one is not a Kabala and the one is not a coefficient.
|
fact1 -> int1: This Micronase is a coefficient.; int1 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 2
| 18
|
Rumoring happens but crisis does not occurs.
|
fact1: The claim that smelling but not flirting takes place is incorrect. fact2: That chirping electrocardiogram and non-uninucleateness happen does not hold. fact3: That that incident but not takeoff happens is correct is incorrect. fact4: That vitality but not eurhythmy happens is wrong. fact5: Labial does not happens and/or narrating Alstroemeriaceae does not happens. fact6: That rumoring takes place and crisis takes place does not stand. fact7: That reassuring lethality but not accreditation happens does not hold. fact8: The fact that crawling Entelea and pleading aeromedicine occur is wrong. fact9: That ordering knack takes place and vendetta does not occurs does not hold. fact10: The fact that the proposition that plosion occurs but dreading Jericho does not takes place is false stands. fact11: Sunshine leads to narrating Alstroemeriaceae. fact12: That fossilisation and non-Britishness happen does not stand. fact13: Fibrilloseness happens or labial occurs or both. fact14: That both outcrying and unsensationalness take place does not stand. fact15: The fact that biblioticness and booing admirableness happen is wrong.
|
UNKNOWN
| 0
| 15
|
|
That there is someone such that he/she ripples and/or he/she is unhelpful is invalid.
|
fact1: There is some person such that this person is a competitiveness and/or profound. fact2: Either this pollyfish does ripple or it irks decile or both. fact3: The roughage apparels Babar. fact4: Ida is a apercu and/or it is Shintoist. fact5: This pollyfish is unhelpful and it is profound if there is something such that it is not unhelpful. fact6: Every man ripples.
|
fact6 -> int1: That X ripples.; int1 -> int2: That X does ripple and/or it is unhelpful.; int2 -> int3: Either everything ripples or that is not helpful or both.; int3 -> int4: That this pollyfish ripples or it is unhelpful or both holds.; int4 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 5
| 5
|
Let's assume that clangouring does not takes place.
|
fact1: The proposition that not speeding kwai but Churchillianness occurs is not right. fact2: That non-Churchillianness and speeding kwai take place does not stand. fact3: That Churchillianness takes place but clangouring does not takes place is wrong. fact4: Catapulting Apocynaceae happens.
|
UNKNOWN
| 0
| 3
|
|
That tops happens and adrenocorticalness takes place is invalid.
|
fact1: Pitcher and anureticness occur. fact2: Laparotomy takes place. fact3: Adrenocorticalness happens and/or vitreousness occurs. fact4: The fact that undemandingness does not takes place and/or preoccupation occurs does not stand. fact5: Chuck does not happens. fact6: Lassoing Gehenna does not takes place. fact7: Dowering bugology happens. fact8: Adrenocorticalness happens. fact9: The proposition that tops does not occurs and/or Lassoing Gehenna takes place is incorrect. fact10: If tops does not takes place vitreousness does not happens.
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that tops does not occurs.; assump1 -> int1: Tops does not occurs and/or Lassoing Gehenna takes place.; int1 & fact9 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: Tops occurs.; int3 & fact8 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 5
| 8
|
There is somebody such that if the one is not nonparametric the one does not hiss sacredness.
|
fact1: All men are not mols and/or the persons do not repeal cps. fact2: If some person does hiss sacredness that person is a mol or that person perceives hypercatalectic or both. fact3: All things are felicitous and/or they do not repeal cps. fact4: That dumpcart does hiss sacredness if that dumpcart is not nonparametric. fact5: That if something rediscovers Soleidae then it does not repeal cps stands. fact6: There is something such that if it is not nonparametric the fact that it hisses sacredness is not false. fact7: A Hotei either is a factorisation or rediscovers Soleidae or both. fact8: Either everything is not a factorisation or the thing does not repeal cps or both. fact9: If that dumpcart is not non-nonparametric then that dumpcart does not hiss sacredness. fact10: That dumpcart does not hiss sacredness if that dumpcart is not nonparametric.
|
fact10 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 1
| 9
|
That that cortina is not a haemophilia and not pectic is false.
|
fact1: That this hegari is pectic and/or this is not adenoidal if this depressive is presidential is valid. fact2: This depressive is not implacable and/or the thing does not conceive opulence. fact3: That cortina is non-pectic if this hegari is non-pectic. fact4: If someone is not implacable then that one is pectic and/or not a Nepenthaceae. fact5: That Cochimi is dextral and/or it is not a misanthropy if that this hegari is not adenoidal is not invalid. fact6: If there is something such that the thing does not conceive opulence this depressive is not implacable. fact7: That that cortina is a haemophilia that is not pectic is false. fact8: If this depressive is pectic then it either is Cartesian or is not unpresidential or both. fact9: That the fact that that cortina is not pectic is valid if this veranda crowns is true. fact10: Something is non-pectic if it is not sarcolemnous. fact11: That every person conceives opulence does not hold. fact12: That that cortina is not a haemophilia but it is pectic is not true. fact13: This veranda crowns or that person is not pectic or both if that Cochimi is not non-dextral. fact14: That cortina is implacable and it boards Daedalus if there is some man such that it is not implacable. fact15: That that cortina is not pectic holds if that Cochimi is not a misanthropy. fact16: If there is something such that it boards Daedalus that that Seychellois is not a haemophilia and it does not boards Daedalus is invalid. fact17: Some person that is a ametria is not pectic. fact18: Either that cortina is a ametria or it is not sarcolemnous or both if this depressive is Cartesian. fact19: That cortina is not pectic if that this veranda is pectic is correct.
|
UNKNOWN
| 0
| 19
|
|
Bunging frankness takes place or bluntness takes place or both.
|
fact1: Bunging frankness does not occurs. fact2: Either anastomosing takes place or superior does not takes place or both. fact3: That both non-bluntness and superior take place is false. fact4: That bunging frankness takes place and/or objectification occurs is false. fact5: Rinsing takes place. fact6: Tameness does not occurs and contacting does not takes place. fact7: Election does not takes place. fact8: Bluntness takes place. fact9: That bunging frankness but not bluntness happens is false. fact10: That both bluntness and anastomosing take place does not hold. fact11: That neither convening occurs nor imbibing occurs is right.
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that neither bunging frankness nor bluntness occur.; assump1 -> int1: Bluntness does not happens.; int1 & fact8 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: That bunging frankness does not occurs and bluntness does not takes place does not stand.; int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 5
| 10
|
This ponycart does not sanction geezerhood.
|
fact1: This ponycart does sanction geezerhood and is redemptional. fact2: If something does not sanction geezerhood then it is not polar. fact3: The blackcock is both a hysterocatalepsy and uncleared. fact4: All men are either malapropos or not Hymenaeas or both. fact5: That this ponycart is classed as a ranula holds. fact6: That lazaretto sanctions geezerhood. fact7: That this optics is malapropos and it is redemptional stands. fact8: This ponycart is redemptional.
|
fact1 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED.
|
DISPROVED
| 1
| 7
|
Teetertottering does not takes place.
|
fact1: Majors happens.
|
UNKNOWN
| 0
| 1
|
|
Inhumation takes place.
|
fact1: Either crystallineness takes place or participialness takes place or both. fact2: Imperialisticness does not takes place and/or antiphonariness does not takes place. fact3: That Brith does not takes place is prevented by non-overheadness. fact4: Either econometricness does not occurs or undesignedness does not takes place or both. fact5: Inhumation is triggered by that sugaring lateral does not occurs. fact6: Congenialness occurs. fact7: Separate happens. fact8: That shuddering happens is not false. fact9: Repositinging takes place and epidemiologicalness happens. fact10: Ingurgitating Gagarin happens. fact11: Coleridgeanness takes place and/or liquifying Tunguz happens. fact12: Viscometricness takes place. fact13: Tilling happens and jujutsu occurs. fact14: Outlasting Klaipeda occurs and/or catcher does not takes place. fact15: Epidemiologicalness does not occurs and/or sugaring lateral does not occurs. fact16: Either butyricness takes place or voicing Zimbabwe happens or both. fact17: Repositinging takes place.
|
fact9 -> int1: Epidemiologicalness takes place.; int1 -> int2: Either inhumation or epidemiologicalness or both happens.; int2 -> int3: Epidemiologicalness or inhumation or both occurs.; int3 -> int4: Non-epidemiologicalness causes inhumation.; int4 & fact15 & fact5 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 5
| 14
|
Insert takes place.
|
fact1: Iridaceousness occurs. fact2: Both derivationalness and chicane happen. fact3: Either inspiring takes place or arguing does not takes place or both. fact4: Insert is triggered by that blacking does not takes place. fact5: Inspiring occurs. fact6: Blacking does not happens or insert does not takes place or both if inspiring does not takes place. fact7: That neither arguing nor antibioticness occur does not hold. fact8: Arguing and inspiring happen. fact9: That arguing does not occurs and/or that inspiring does not happens is brought about by that galling decrepitude does not occurs. fact10: Arguing does not happens or blacking does not takes place or both. fact11: That tubing Corypha happens is brought about by that equilibrising decennary does not occurs.
|
fact8 -> int1: Arguing happens.; int1 -> int2: Insert takes place and/or arguing happens.; int2 -> int3: Arguing and/or insert occurs.; int3 -> int4: Insert is brought about by that arguing does not happens.; int4 & fact10 & fact4 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 5
| 8
|
There is someone such that the claim that the one is non-likeable one that is non-ablated is invalid.
|
fact1: There is something such that that this thing neither improves squelched nor does apply Thammuz is incorrect. fact2: The statement that there is something such that that this thing is non-subcortical thing that improves squelched is wrong is right. fact3: That Jihadist is either a Rodin or not aperiodic or both. fact4: That the polybutene does not accent Lamnidae and this thing is not likeable is false. fact5: That Miss is likeable. fact6: There is something such that that it does not amaze Damocles and it is not a animality is not valid.
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that Miss is not likeable and is not ablated.; assump1 -> int1: That Miss is not likeable.; int1 & fact5 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: That that Miss is not likeable and this is not ablated does not hold.; int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 5
| 5
|
Europeanness occurs or nonintegratedness occurs or both.
|
fact1: Fairness does not happens. fact2: That greaterness occurs but avoiding Teucrium does not occurs is incorrect. fact3: Either habitation takes place or mending does not happens or both. fact4: Europeanness occurs. fact5: The claim that habitation and nonintegratedness happen is incorrect. fact6: Tactualness takes place. fact7: That dormancy happens and tactualness does not occurs does not hold. fact8: Fairness takes place and/or overdosing Upupa does not occurs if nonintegratedness does not happens. fact9: That non-Europeanness and nonintegratedness happen is incorrect. fact10: That overdosing Upupa does not occurs but earthiness occurs is false. fact11: That zymoidness but not chaetalness happens does not hold. fact12: That spotting Thalictrum does not takes place but basilarness happens is incorrect. fact13: That Europeanness happens and nonintegratedness does not happens does not stand. fact14: Inhumeding Perdicidae or unplugging adverb or both takes place.
|
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both non-Europeanness and non-nonintegratedness occur.; assump1 -> int1: Europeanness does not takes place.; int1 & fact4 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: That both non-Europeanness and non-nonintegratedness happen does not stand.; int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 5
| 13
|
This morel is not a Sandburg but that is a trapped.
|
fact1: This morel is a trapped. fact2: The macrospore is a fin but not a casuistry. fact3: If there is something such that that thing is a fin and that thing is not a casuistry then this lumbermill is not a austereness. fact4: This morel is not a Sandburg but that is a trapped.
|
fact4 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED.
|
PROVED
| 0
| 3
|
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
No dataset card yet
- Downloads last month
- 3