hypothesis stringlengths 11 195 | facts stringlengths 21 2.46k | proofs stringlengths 0 523 | proof_label stringclasses 3
values | steps int64 0 5 | num_all_distractors int64 0 21 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The fact that nonmovingness does not takes place and abdominovesicalness does not happens is false. | fact1: Neither deployment nor mindlessness take place. fact2: Sustainableness does not happens and cousinliness does not takes place. fact3: Abdominovesicalness does not occurs. fact4: Skylarking Polypodiaceae does not occurs. fact5: Nonmovingness does not happens. fact6: Fermentableness does not takes place. | fact5 & fact3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 1 | 4 |
This coping is unpriestly. | fact1: The statement that either Imelda is a tortuousness or it does not react or both holds. fact2: If Imelda is unpriestly this coping does not react. fact3: This coping is not a tortuousness if Imelda does not react. fact4: That Imelda is unpriestly if this coping does not react is valid. fact5: This coping reacts i... | fact1 & fact7 & fact9 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 1 | 10 |
Coco is not a tango. | fact1: If there is some man such that this one is not a officiousness this vine is not a sprouted and is a pettiness. fact2: That Riesling either is not a pettiness or is not a sprouted or both. fact3: Coco is a tango if that that Riesling is not nondisposable is valid. fact4: That Riesling is classed as a officiousnes... | fact8 -> int1: If that Riesling is nondisposable then it is a pettiness.; fact10 -> int2: That Riesling is a sprouted if that Riesling is a officiousness.; int1 & fact2 & int2 -> int3: That Riesling is not nondisposable or it is not a officiousness or both.; int3 & fact5 & fact6 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say t... | PROVED | 4 | 11 |
This caster is not an arrayed. | fact1: Everybody is an arrayed. fact2: There exists no one that is a Cuscuta and/or is not breaone. fact3: That planner is an arrayed. fact4: That everyone is non-breathless one that is not a Cuscuta is valid. | fact1 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 1 | 3 |
That ire and/or non-significantness happens does not hold. | fact1: That faecalness occurs is triggered by that comporting Bankia does not occurs. fact2: Non-pancreaticness prevents that ire does not happens. fact3: Ire and/or inquiry happens if Maleness does not takes place. fact4: That either prising occurs or flaring Athyriaceae happens or both is valid. fact5: Joyfulness hap... | fact11 -> int1: Ire takes place and/or inquiry occurs.; int1 -> int2: Inquiry occurs or ire occurs or both.; int2 -> int3: That inquiry does not occurs causes that ire takes place.; int3 & fact10 & fact2 -> int4: Ire happens.; int4 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 5 | 8 |
Insectivorousness and extrinsicness happen. | fact1: Both snarling Malopterurus and continuing Thraupidae take place. fact2: Sexploitation occurs and starlessness takes place. fact3: Terrestrialness happens and detoxification happens. fact4: Extrinsicness takes place. fact5: Sexploitation and groundball occur. fact6: Reproving aloofness takes place. | UNKNOWN | 0 | 5 | |
The statement that both philhellenicness and dialysis happen is wrong. | fact1: Both festival and animating occur. fact2: Beguiling Shiah happens. fact3: Countersuit occurs and/or philhellenicness occurs. fact4: That swelled does not occurs or crinkling Lebanon does not happens or both holds if bunting does not takes place. fact5: Inventorying and wiggle occur. fact6: Philhellenicness takes... | fact12 -> int1: Dialysis occurs.; int1 & fact6 -> int2: Dialysis occurs and philhellenicness happens.; int2 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 3 | 13 |
That there is something such that if it is not cryptological then it is unjust is wrong. | fact1: That elastic is spherical if that elastic is not unjust. fact2: There is someone such that if it is not spherical it is an interior. fact3: All non-spherical things are not 10. fact4: That that Calymmatobacterium is unjust is correct if it is cryptological. fact5: All persons do not theologize or are non-cryptol... | fact9 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 1 | 20 |
Technicalness occurs and/or experimentation does not takes place. | fact1: Not prompting Thoreau but hierarchalness occurs. fact2: Echoicness does not occurs but mothballing Lophophora occurs. fact3: Technicalness takes place. fact4: The claim that lidlessness occurs and experimentation occurs is invalid. fact5: Either lidlessness or postulationalness or both occurs. fact6: Retrogressi... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that non-technicalness and experimentation happen.; assump1 -> int1: Technicalness does not happens.; int1 & fact3 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: That non-technicalness and experimentation occur is false.; int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hy... | PROVED | 5 | 7 |
Let's assume that this minimum is both not a Centropus and live. | fact1: That this minimum is a Centropus and live is invalid. fact2: This minimum is a Centropus. fact3: The fact that this minimum is not a kind of an alsatian but this thing is a Uintatherium does not stand. | void -> assump1: Let's assume that this minimum is both not a Centropus and live.; assump1 -> int1: This minimum is not classified as a Centropus.; int1 & fact2 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 4 | 2 |
Both introversiveness and enterprise occur. | fact1: Clenching and updraft occur. fact2: Argumentativeness is prevented by that exercising does not happens. fact3: Underlying brings about enterprise. fact4: Secularness is triggered by pushing. fact5: That federation does not takes place is prevented by that response does not takes place. fact6: Crookesing and/or n... | fact11 & fact3 & fact17 -> int1: Enterprise happens.; int1 & fact15 -> int2: Enterprise and introversiveness take place.; int2 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED. | PROVED | 3 | 13 |
Let's assume that that clingstone does not center decibel. | fact1: The thermoelectricity is anticlockwise. fact2: If there is somebody such that that it is a shrillness that is an alimony is incorrect then that clingstone is not anticlockwise. fact3: That that clingstone does not center decibel and is not anticlockwise is incorrect. fact4: There is something such that the fact ... | fact4 & fact2 -> int1: That clingstone is not anticlockwise.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that clingstone does not center decibel.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: That clingstone neither centers decibel nor is anticlockwise.; int2 & fact3 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we ... | DISPROVED | 5 | 3 |
There is something such that if it is Jainist then it is a crowding. | fact1: That diagnostician does unthawed if that diagnostician is ungrateful. fact2: This nosepiece is bicipital if this nosepiece is a crowding. fact3: If German is a lock it is a quiet. fact4: This bower is Jainist if it is prognathic. fact5: If that diagnostician is a prickle that that diagnostician is Jainist holds.... | UNKNOWN | 0 | 16 | |
Let's assume that Mercy is not Scythian and/or it does not trail rhyming. | fact1: If that Mercy does not trail rhyming is not incorrect Mercy is not a Zacharias. fact2: That subvocalizer is not unpunished. fact3: That archive is a Zacharias and it is a Pyle. fact4: Some man is not a Zacharias if that person is non-Scythian. fact5: All non-unpunished persons are microbic and/or not vascular. f... | fact4 -> int1: If Mercy is not Scythian then Mercy is not a Zacharias.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that Mercy is not Scythian and/or it does not trail rhyming.; int1 & assump1 & fact1 -> int2: Mercy is not a Zacharias.; int2 & fact9 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can... | DISPROVED | 5 | 15 |
That primingness does not occurs is not incorrect. | fact1: Either designation happens or waging occurs or both. fact2: That afforestation does not happens leads to either handicapping Oireachtas or non-equivocalness or both. fact3: Waging triggers Kuwaitiness. fact4: That afforestation does not takes place yields that waging does not happens. fact5: If identifying Conod... | fact7 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 0 | 19 |
This whisk does not butter Andalusia. | fact1: A smoky one is not a hands and/or is not an imprinting. fact2: This whisk is not a tendonitis and/or it is not nonspherical if this Somalian does not butter Andalusia. fact3: All things are nonspherical things that are not Trinidads. fact4: This whisk is fledged and the thing butters Andalusia. fact5: If the fac... | fact4 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 1 | 17 |
There is something such that if it is not sensational then it is a Fringilla. | fact1: if that deaconess does not weave Oahu there is somebody such that it is not riparian or is a sociology or both. | UNKNOWN | 0 | 0 | |
There is some man such that if this person is not horary this person is a kind of a paramilitary and/or is a thirties. | fact1: If some person does not Cork desirability it is not non-rupicolous and/or it votes Medicaid. fact2: This alienor is catoptrical and/or this one is horary if this alienor is not a Nephelium. fact3: That something is fissile and/or it imagines Flindersia if it is not animatistic is valid. fact4: The shopaholic is ... | UNKNOWN | 0 | 16 | |
This nylons is not a Jerusalem. | fact1: There is something such that either that is liveried or that ICES Dartmouth or both. fact2: There is something such that it is a Senefelder or it is a misconception or both. fact3: This nylons is not a Jerusalem if there is somebody such that it is a Senefelder or is a misconception or both. fact4: This nylons i... | fact2 & fact3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED. | PROVED | 1 | 6 |
That this cymene is classified as a dauntlessness and that person rips does not stand. | fact1: This cymene is a dauntlessness. fact2: There is someone such that she/he is Bosnian. fact3: This sensitizer is not a passport and not a trifling. fact4: This cymene does not degrease seediness if a Bosnian thing degrease seediness. fact5: If there is some man such that it is not a passport then this angostura de... | fact1 & fact7 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 1 | 5 |
Vasotomy takes place. | fact1: Scanning skewness takes place and cytoplasmicness takes place. fact2: Awakening occurs and jaded takes place. fact3: Vasotomy and reclaiming happen. fact4: That that neither reclaiming nor vasotomy take place is right does not hold. fact5: Fluoroscopy happens. fact6: Contemplation occurs. | fact3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED. | PROVED | 1 | 5 |
This hessian collies and does speak. | fact1: If somebody does not seethe this hessian speaks. fact2: This hessian seethes. fact3: There is something such that that it does colly and it seethes is not correct. fact4: Faisal is bismuthic or it is not aeromechanic or both if that Faisal is not a Xanthorrhoeaceae holds. fact5: If there is something such that i... | fact10 -> int1: There is something such that that it is not a landed is true.; int1 & fact13 -> int2: The claim that Faisal is a Xanthorrhoeaceae and that seethes is not correct.; int2 -> int3: There is some person such that that he/she is a Xanthorrhoeaceae and seethes does not stand.; int3 & fact7 -> int4: This hessi... | PROVED | 5 | 18 |
That that either favourableness occurs or bichromatedness does not happens or both is incorrect stands. | fact1: Wattling Giraffa occurs and/or premiership does not takes place. fact2: Lockup brings about that drum and/or pureness occurs. fact3: Favourableness happens or bichromatedness happens or both. fact4: Bichromatedness does not occurs. fact5: Bichromatedness is brought about by progression. fact6: Drum prevents non-... | fact4 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 1 | 8 |
That that samovar is not a faultlessness and/or it is not a plonk is invalid. | fact1: This tinker is interlocutory and fashionable. | UNKNOWN | 0 | 1 | |
The fact that all persons do not put Qatar and are not lamentings is wrong. | fact1: Everything is not a Psyllidae and it is unsmooth. fact2: Everything does not put Qatar. fact3: All ones do not put Qatar and they are not lamentings. fact4: That everything is not a simian is not false. fact5: Everything is not interdepartmental and that is not a Lydian. | fact3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 0 | 4 |
Unconstitutionalness does not happens. | fact1: That busting AAA does not happens is triggered by that downshift does not occurs. fact2: Inscriptiveness occurs. fact3: Either moralness happens or mailing does not occurs or both if overworking does not takes place. fact4: That overworking happens and swim occurs is not true. fact5: That busting AAA does not ta... | fact13 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 0 | 18 |
That underlayment is not unflattering and the person does not diagram rococo. | fact1: That underlayment is not a research if there is something such that the proposition that it is a halfpenny and it is a research does not stand. fact2: This essayer is a halfpenny if that is not a Cuterebra. fact3: This essayer is not a Cuterebra or non-splayfoot or both if the overcasting is a Spica. fact4: If t... | UNKNOWN | 0 | 7 | |
Screwup occurs. | fact1: Non-operaticness is brought about by that amble does not takes place. fact2: Non-alkalicness and/or non-maturedness occurs. fact3: That ebbing does not takes place prevents unargumentativeness. fact4: Screwup occurs if alkalicness does not occurs. fact5: Either non-alkalicness or non-argumentativeness or both ta... | fact6 -> int1: Maturedness occurs.; int1 -> int2: Screwup or maturedness or both takes place.; int2 -> int3: Maturedness takes place and/or screwup occurs.; int3 -> int4: If maturedness does not happens screwup happens.; int4 & fact2 & fact4 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED. | PROVED | 5 | 7 |
There is someone such that if it is not a Acre then it is either not parental or not a OIS or both. | fact1: There is somebody such that if that he is a gutsiness is right either he is not a Heimdall or he is apologetic or both. fact2: There exists something such that if it is humbled that it does not disillusion Cleistes or it does not bawl vi or both is right. fact3: There is some person such that if it does not post... | fact16 -> int1: That either this forward is not parental or it is not a OIS or both is not false if this forward is not a Acre.; int1 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED. | PROVED | 2 | 16 |
The fact that acneiformness occurs and misappropriation occurs is not correct. | fact1: Shears and ruggedness happen. fact2: Misappropriation takes place. fact3: If acneiformness takes place parasympatheticness does not occurs or seasonableness does not happens or both. fact4: Acneiformness or fruitage or both happens. fact5: Forcipateness and boring take place. fact6: Acneiformness takes place. fa... | fact2 & fact6 -> int1: Misappropriation happens and acneiformness takes place.; int1 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 2 | 5 |
Investing M3 takes place. | fact1: Finnishness does not takes place. fact2: Non-Finnishness and faltering Quebec occur. fact3: Mystic takes place. fact4: The fact that faltering Quebec but not investing M3 happens is incorrect. fact5: Servileness does not happens. | fact2 -> int1: Faltering Quebec takes place.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that investing M3 does not occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: That faltering Quebec occurs but investing M3 does not takes place is right.; int2 & fact4 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that... | PROVED | 5 | 3 |
The fact that that denoting Anguis and/or matutinalness happens is not wrong does not hold. | fact1: Matutinalness does not takes place or denoting Anguis does not occurs or both. fact2: Bargaining hectogram does not happens. fact3: Knelling does not takes place. fact4: Disbarment does not happens. fact5: Either Reconstruction takes place or faulting occurs or both if matutinalness does not takes place. fact6: ... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that denoting Anguis does not happens and matutinalness does not happens.; assump1 -> int1: Matutinalness does not occurs.; int1 & fact12 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: The statement that neither denoting Anguis happens nor matutinalness takes place is false.; i... | DISPROVED | 5 | 12 |
That there is something such that that it does not confound Cocteau and is a kind of a tuppence does not hold is invalid. | fact1: This lutanist confounds Cocteau. fact2: the Cocteau confounds lutanist. | void -> assump1: Let's assume that this lutanist does not confound Cocteau and is a tuppence.; assump1 -> int1: This lutanist does not confound Cocteau.; int1 & fact1 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: That this lutanist does not confound Cocteau and is a tuppence does not hold.; int3 -> hypothe... | DISPROVED | 5 | 1 |
Substantialness does not takes place and exhilarating crossbones does not takes place. | fact1: Non-noncollapsibleness and stain happen. fact2: Searching Watson does not occurs. fact3: Magnetising ironed takes place or killing wizardry takes place or both. fact4: That devolution takes place holds. fact5: Sotho does not occurs. fact6: Aramaicness does not takes place and interrupting coronach does not takes... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that substantialness takes place.; fact14 & assump1 -> int1: Not subleasing razzle but substantialness occurs.; int1 & fact8 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: Substantialness does not takes place.; int3 & fact17 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypo... | PROVED | 5 | 16 |
That harrowing royalty and associationalness take place does not hold. | fact1: Conditioning does not takes place. fact2: Eupneicness does not takes place but associationalness happens. fact3: Harrowing royalty occurs. fact4: Eupneicness does not happens. fact5: That reconverting occurs stands. fact6: Not unfreezing invoice but brachycephalic occurs. | fact2 -> int1: The claim that associationalness happens stands.; int1 & fact3 -> int2: That associationalness takes place and harrowing royalty occurs holds.; int2 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 3 | 4 |
This Ac divides Cetoniidae. | fact1: This Ac is apothegmatical. fact2: This Ac is a ravenousness. fact3: This sniveling is both not a potful and a Hymenomycetes if somebody marginalises Annelida. fact4: This Burgess divides Cetoniidae. fact5: Every man divides Cetoniidae. fact6: The epicardium divides Cetoniidae. fact7: This sniveling either is cyt... | fact5 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED. | PROVED | 1 | 19 |
That shrinkableness takes place and womanliness happens does not hold. | fact1: Viviparousness occurs. fact2: Cobbling yields non-bivalvedness or that unfastening Antigua does not occurs or both. fact3: Muffling takes place or paleoanthropologicalness happens or both. fact4: Womanliness happens. fact5: Shrinkableness happens or cobbling does not happens or both. fact6: That cobbling does no... | UNKNOWN | 0 | 8 | |
Boustrophedonicness does not occurs. | fact1: That contempt does not takes place is caused by that parking does not occurs. fact2: Clyster or financing or both occurs. fact3: That contempt occurs and/or elaboration does not takes place is right. fact4: Weightlift takes place and/or elaboration takes place. fact5: That clyster does not happens is brought abo... | UNKNOWN | 0 | 10 | |
Let's assume that reconsidering Pulmonata does not occurs and dialectalness does not happens. | fact1: The fact that bolting does not occurs is correct. fact2: That reconsidering Pulmonata but not dialectalness occurs does not hold. fact3: That both non-saltyness and non-avitaminoticness happen does not stand. fact4: Perfected happens. fact5: Orienting sabin does not happens. fact6: Purposing does not occurs and ... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that reconsidering Pulmonata does not occurs and dialectalness does not happens.; assump1 -> int1: Dialectalness does not occurs.; int1 & fact8 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 4 | 10 |
That there exists someone such that that it is not a cesarean and does not countermine is incorrect is false. | fact1: There is something such that that that thing is not a cesarean and that thing countermines is invalid. fact2: The claim that that SUV countermines is correct. | void -> assump1: Let's assume that that SUV is not a cesarean and does not countermine.; assump1 -> int1: That SUV does not countermine.; int1 & fact2 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: That that SUV is not a cesarean and does not countermine is incorrect.; int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we ca... | DISPROVED | 5 | 1 |
That some person is adenocarcinomatous is false. | fact1: This pinocytosis does not Hale Pidlimdi and does not brew. fact2: The fact that that Pashtoon is anthropogenetic but it is not unmanageable is false. fact3: That Valentina does hoard acrocyanosis but it is not adenocarcinomatous does not stand. fact4: Valentina hoards acrocyanosis. fact5: This pee hoards acrocya... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that Valentina is not adenocarcinomatous is right.; fact4 & assump1 -> int1: Valentina hoards acrocyanosis but this one is not adenocarcinomatous.; int1 & fact3 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: Valentina is adenocarcinomatous.; int3 -> hypothesis; As... | DISPROVED | 5 | 6 |
There is something such that the statement that it does not content multinomial and it is lasting does not hold. | fact1: This Tatar is lasting. fact2: That this congealment is not Mesozoic and/or is lasting is incorrect if there is some person such that she/he contents multinomial. fact3: Something does not content multinomial but it is lasting. fact4: That Mirian is not wintry and it does not coarseness hardihood does not stand i... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that this fantasist does not content multinomial but it is lasting.; assump1 -> int1: This fantasist is lasting.; int1 & fact11 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: That this fantasist does not content multinomial but this one is lasting is not valid.; int3 -> hypothe... | PROVED | 5 | 11 |
That tach does not forest preciseness or demises Ammodytidae or both. | fact1: Either that californium does not forest preciseness or it splinters unconfessed or both. fact2: All things forest preciseness and/or demise Ammodytidae. fact3: Every person does not reduce Lyginopteris or is bacterioidal or both. fact4: Every person does not recapitulate experienced or the person is fecal or bot... | UNKNOWN | 0 | 19 | |
The claim that there is someone such that if it wears then it is not a Gallinula is incorrect. | fact1: There is something such that if it is unheeding it does not plead harnessed. fact2: If that rangeland is downstairs that rangeland is a Gallinula. fact3: If someone gasconades leftism then the one either wears or does not combine cotan or both. fact4: All ones combine cotan. fact5: If that that rangeland does ki... | fact7 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 1 | 8 |
Spectroscopicness does not takes place. | fact1: Toping Ontario is caused by that xerography occurs. fact2: Embarkation occurs. fact3: Xerography is triggered by that toping Ontario does not occurs. fact4: Oozing does not occurs. fact5: That historiography does not takes place is caused by dependentness. fact6: Allying waveband occurs. fact7: Toping Ontario oc... | fact9 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED. | PROVED | 1 | 19 |
That there is somebody such that it is continuous and/or it is a Chelifer does not hold. | fact1: The glume is a Assam. fact2: This bawdyhouse either idealises hoodooism or does rove tiered or both. fact3: If there is something such that the thing is a Assam then that Portuguese is not a reasonableness and the thing is not aetiological. fact4: This streak is a reasonableness if a Chelifer is not a reasonable... | fact5 -> int1: That the X is continuous is correct.; int1 -> int2: The X is continuous and/or this person is a Chelifer.; int2 -> int3: Either all ones are not discontinuous or those persons are Chelifers or both.; int3 -> int4: That Portuguese is continuous and/or it is a Chelifer.; int4 -> hypothesis; As a result, we... | DISPROVED | 5 | 7 |
That that shawl is a Devanagari and he/she is a Ignatius does not hold. | fact1: This accompanyist is not a Devanagari if this throughput is not Skinnerian. fact2: This axon is a Devanagari. fact3: That there is nothing such that it does not decollate disquietude and it does not oversupply Daubentoniidae does not hold. fact4: That shawl is a Ignatius. fact5: Some person that does not oversup... | fact12 & fact4 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 1 | 14 |
Let's assume that this sugar is a Bhutanese. | fact1: This hypochlorite is a Marini and/or is a pharmaceutical if it is intertidal. fact2: This sugar is a megacardia. fact3: This sugar bays amphictyony and is not circulatory. fact4: If this hypochlorite is a Marini this sugar is intertidal. fact5: This sugar is not a kind of a MALS. fact6: This sugar is a sudorific... | fact11 -> int1: This sugar is not a EiB.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that this sugar is a Bhutanese.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: This sugar is both not a EiB and a Bhutanese.; int2 & fact14 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 5 | 14 |
Equalness occurs and paralyticness happens. | fact1: Equalness and/or paralyticness takes place. fact2: That silencing takes place is correct. fact3: Sailplaning and giving DM occur. fact4: Sprinkle and biquadraticness happen. fact5: Paralyticness happens. fact6: That the fact that neither paralyticness happens nor equalness takes place is valid does not hold. fac... | UNKNOWN | 0 | 8 | |
Let's assume that symbolism does not happens. | fact1: The proposition that symbolism does not happens and orchotomy takes place does not stand. fact2: Repeating does not occurs or denigrating Turgot takes place or both. fact3: Arrogance results in orchotomy. fact4: Non-Darwinianness and/or arrogance occurs. fact5: That coggling occurs results in that either hitting... | fact7 -> int1: Orchotomy occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that symbolism does not happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: Not symbolism but orchotomy occurs.; int2 & fact1 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 5 | 11 |
Purr and schematizing Lombardia happen. | fact1: Baiting suprematism takes place. fact2: Prostaticness happens. fact3: Sloganeeringing happens. fact4: That spattering does not happens prevents that karate does not takes place. fact5: That untalentedness happens holds. fact6: The proposition that karate and emending positivism occur does not hold. fact7: Chirom... | fact13 & fact20 -> int1: Schematizing Lombardia occurs and purr occurs.; int1 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED. | PROVED | 2 | 20 |
This disintegration is not a Tanakh. | fact1: That that anapsid does not recoup perplexity but it is a Piperaceae is not true if there is something such that the statement that it is a Tanakh holds. fact2: That if that something is not pyrographic stands then that does not recoup perplexity stands. fact3: That that anapsid is a Clichy and it is pubic is fal... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that this disintegration is a Tanakh.; assump1 -> int1: There is somebody such that he is a Tanakh.; int1 & fact1 -> int2: That that anapsid does not recoup perplexity but it is a Piperaceae does not stand.; int2 & fact6 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; As a... | PROVED | 5 | 10 |
Both legislation and slithering occur. | fact1: That not legislation but utilisation takes place is invalid. fact2: Both non-myoticness and riffle happen. fact3: Legislation does not happens or invertebrate occurs or both. fact4: Sisterlikeness does not takes place and/or condylarness happens. fact5: Both punctuation and disengagement happen. fact6: Sisterlik... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that legislation does not takes place.; assump1 & fact16 -> int1: Not legislation but utilisation happens.; int1 & fact1 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: Legislation takes place.; int3 & fact13 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED. | PROVED | 5 | 16 |
Both ablating and woodwork happen. | fact1: Claiming autoimmunity occurs and slurping rowdiness takes place. fact2: Woodwork occurs. fact3: Gale takes place. fact4: Ablating happens. | fact2 & fact4 -> int1: Woodwork occurs and ablating happens.; int1 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED. | PROVED | 2 | 2 |
That both representation and immobileness happen does not stand. | fact1: Nullification takes place. fact2: If piercing Bristol takes place creoleness happens. fact3: If internationalization does not occurs either amnios does not occurs or legislatorship does not happens or both. fact4: Either piercing Bristol occurs or candidature does not occurs or both. fact5: Internationalization ... | fact6 -> int1: Immobileness happens.; int1 & fact11 -> int2: Both immobileness and representation take place.; int2 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 3 | 20 |
The fact that this pluralist either drags Hyperborean or does housebreak Kerouac or both is not valid. | fact1: This pluralist drags Hyperborean if this inertia is a Capsidae. fact2: That if this pluralist is physiotherapeutic then this inertia housebreaks Kerouac stands. fact3: That that thioguanine is not fibrocartilaginous stands if this holothurian is classic. fact4: That thioguanine is non-fibrocartilaginous if that ... | fact11 & fact8 & fact1 -> int1: This pluralist drags Hyperborean.; int1 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 2 | 19 |
Neither kicking SA nor rounding take place. | fact1: Neither banging happens nor inhibition happens. fact2: That kicking SA takes place causes obliging ache. fact3: The claim that rounding and non-aeroliticness take place does not hold. fact4: Kicking SA does not takes place. fact5: Physiotherapy does not occurs. fact6: Exalting prognathism does not happens and ri... | UNKNOWN | 0 | 4 | |
Autolyticness and bombing occur. | fact1: Vaporisation but not unfinishedness occurs. fact2: That autolyticness does not occurs and bombing does not happens is false. fact3: Niceneness happens. fact4: Vaporisation and provocativeness happen. fact5: Autolyticness takes place. | UNKNOWN | 0 | 4 | |
That basting occurs and intermediateness occurs does not stand. | fact1: Intermediateness occurs. fact2: The statement that basting occurs is right. fact3: Either trampling or soiled or both happens. | fact1 & fact2 -> int1: Intermediateness happens and basting occurs.; int1 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 2 | 1 |
All men carbonate Hexapoda and are not antitumor. | fact1: All things campaign and they are not unreceptive. fact2: All things are both Eurocentric and not impunities. fact3: All things are not albuminuric and they are not Ribeses. fact4: Every man is a hazardousness and it does not smother Chilopoda. fact5: Everything is longer and that thing is not untimbered. fact6: ... | fact9 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED. | PROVED | 0 | 11 |
That that there exists something such that if that the thing is not pyknotic stands the thing proves earnings is correct is incorrect. | fact1: All non-pyknotic ones do not prove earnings or are not Newgates or both. fact2: If something does not prove earnings then that is undescriptive or a Gyrinidae or both. fact3: All things are not Audenesque or invoke or both. fact4: All things either are not Gyrinidaes or do invoke or both. fact5: There is somebod... | fact6 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 1 | 18 |
That there is somebody such that that that the one does not spread and is scurfy is correct does not hold is invalid. | fact1: That Emmentaler is not a welsh but it is a Hylocichla. fact2: If something is unregenerated then this ameloblast does not wreck sectionalism and it is not unregenerated. fact3: That Emmentaler is scurfy. fact4: There is something such that the thing does not spread and is scurfy. fact5: If there is someone such ... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that that Emmentaler does not spread and is scurfy.; assump1 -> int1: That that Emmentaler does not spread is correct.; int1 & fact8 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: That that Emmentaler does not spread and is scurfy does not stand.; int3 -> hypothesis; As a resul... | DISPROVED | 5 | 7 |
Causing happens. | fact1: Grooming played prevents that causing does not occurs. fact2: Meaning does not happens and/or causing does not occurs. fact3: That meaning does not happens yields that Transportation or sorrowfulness or both takes place. fact4: If Transportation occurs then interiorising sopping happens. fact5: Meaning leads to ... | fact6 & fact1 & fact5 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED. | PROVED | 1 | 5 |
That cohering Sweden or entering strung or both happens is wrong. | fact1: The fact that neither precession happens nor developmentalness takes place does not hold. fact2: That cohering Sweden occurs but entering strung does not occurs is invalid. fact3: Looking happens or socializing Changtzu does not occurs or both. fact4: Isometrics happens. fact5: That entering strung happens holds... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that neither cohering Sweden nor entering strung occur.; assump1 -> int1: Entering strung does not happens.; int1 & fact5 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: The claim that cohering Sweden does not occurs and entering strung does not occurs does not stand.; int3 -> h... | DISPROVED | 5 | 4 |
Onymousness happens and flawing Gulo takes place. | fact1: Overexertion occurs. fact2: Translation occurs. fact3: MRI happens. fact4: Both slam and untying Comatulidae take place. fact5: Loafing happens. fact6: Blackness and mockery occur. fact7: That neither flawing Gulo takes place nor onymousness happens is incorrect. fact8: Flawing Gulo happens. fact9: Onymousness t... | fact8 & fact9 -> int1: Flawing Gulo and onymousness occur.; int1 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED. | PROVED | 2 | 7 |
Let's assume that Offertory takes place. | fact1: Either siliceousness happens or drink takes place or both. fact2: The fact that Offertory but not drink occurs does not hold. fact3: Not drink but siliceousness occurs. | fact3 -> int1: Drink does not happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that Offertory takes place.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: Offertory happens but drink does not occurs.; int2 & fact2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 5 | 1 |
That tonsillectomy occurs and percolation happens does not hold. | fact1: Yemeni occurs. fact2: Tonsillectomy takes place. fact3: Dating happens and dusk happens. | UNKNOWN | 0 | 2 | |
That both victimizing crinkled and bloodlessness happen does not stand. | fact1: That countercharge takes place and/or growl does not happens is correct. fact2: Pasteurianness takes place. fact3: Both raising and bloodlessness happen. fact4: Shriving prevents that growl does not takes place. fact5: Liner is brought about by prevention. fact6: Victimizing crinkled takes place. fact7: If raisi... | fact3 -> int1: Bloodlessness occurs.; int1 & fact6 -> int2: Bloodlessness and victimizing crinkled happen.; int2 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 3 | 11 |
That there is something such that that either it is not a Oecanthus or it does not harrow impreciseness or both is incorrect does not hold. | fact1: There is something such that that this is not a Chorizema or this is not a Oecanthus or both is wrong. fact2: That hexapod harrows impreciseness if that amylum is not a Oecanthus. fact3: There is someone such that that the person either is a Oecanthus or does not harrow impreciseness or both does not stand. fact... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that that hexapod is not a Oecanthus and/or it does not harrow impreciseness.; assump1 & fact8 & fact9 -> int1: That amylum is a Chorizema.; int1 & fact6 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: That that hexapod is not a Oecanthus or this person does not harrow imprecise... | DISPROVED | 5 | 9 |
Let's assume that this deadhead is a Agaricaceae or it is non-anosmic or both. | fact1: That madhouse does not bake if this deadhead is a hypospadias. fact2: If this deadhead is a Agaricaceae then that that madhouse does not bake stands. fact3: That madhouse bakes. fact4: This dachsie bakes. fact5: This deadhead does not bake if that madhouse is a Agaricaceae. fact6: If this deadhead is not anosmic... | UNKNOWN | 0 | 3 | |
That frocking Scorsese and monetization take place does not stand. | fact1: That frocking Scorsese happens is valid. fact2: Gazumping takes place if jacks does not takes place. fact3: Defining expo and vacuolateness take place. fact4: Monetization takes place if fake does not occurs. fact5: That carjacking resoluteness does not happens prevents that monetization does not takes place. fa... | fact6 & fact4 & fact5 -> int1: That monetization happens is valid.; int1 & fact1 -> int2: Monetization and frocking Scorsese take place.; int2 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 3 | 3 |
Craning meliorism takes place and toughening metaphase takes place. | fact1: Investiture happens and comeback takes place. fact2: Either contenting takes place or manifestation does not takes place or both if toughening metaphase happens. fact3: Craning meliorism takes place. fact4: Toughening metaphase takes place. fact5: Contenting leads to that bronchospasm occurs and/or mortifying ha... | fact4 & fact3 -> int1: Both toughening metaphase and Craning meliorism take place.; int1 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED. | PROVED | 2 | 7 |
That warehousing Dreyfus does not happens and uncomfortableness takes place does not hold. | fact1: Nonracialness does not happens. fact2: Canceling lithology is triggered by scaring. fact3: The fact that that neither uncomfortableness happens nor nonracialness takes place does not hold holds. fact4: Scaring occurs or naturalizing does not happens or both. fact5: Warehousing Dreyfus does not occurs. | void -> assump1: Let's assume that uncomfortableness does not takes place.; assump1 & fact1 -> int1: Uncomfortableness does not takes place and nonracialness does not happens.; int1 & fact3 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: Uncomfortableness occurs.; int3 & fact5 -> hypothesis; As a result, we ... | DISPROVED | 5 | 2 |
This stone reclines Diapensiales and does not vacillate clawed. | fact1: The taconite reclines Diapensiales and is not a theatrical. fact2: This stone is a anuran. fact3: That this stone is a Cannae stands. fact4: This stone is a kind of postnatal thing that is not a vibe. fact5: This stone is shiny but it does not vacillate clawed. fact6: This stone is both animate and not colorecta... | fact10 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED. | PROVED | 0 | 20 |
That moocher does not underquote yatobyo. | fact1: This tincture either trounces or is balconied or both if this tincture petitions windburn. fact2: The stakeholder petitions windburn and that person does underquote yatobyo if someone is not aecial. fact3: that windburn petitions tincture. fact4: This tincture petitions windburn. fact5: This tincture observes au... | fact9 -> int1: There is something such that that it disinvests and is not a itchiness is not true.; int1 & fact5 -> int2: This tincture observes autographed.; int2 & fact4 -> int3: This tincture observes autographed and does petition windburn.; int3 -> int4: There is something such that that that does observe autograph... | DISPROVED | 5 | 5 |
That chili is not icosahedral. | fact1: That chili is not non-icosahedral if something that pitches splenomegaly does containerize adaptability. fact2: That lacewing is a forthcomingness and/or corrupt if there is something such that it cats adamance. fact3: That clon is anestrous. fact4: If that Circus is not a kind of a AAA then this cedarwood does ... | fact8 -> int1: That clon pitches splenomegaly and is not forceful.; int1 -> int2: That clon pitches splenomegaly.; int2 & fact9 -> int3: That clon does pitch splenomegaly and it does containerize adaptability.; int3 -> int4: Something pitches splenomegaly and containerizes adaptability.; int4 & fact1 -> hypothesis; As ... | DISPROVED | 5 | 17 |
That ensemble is a Ptyas. | fact1: This march is a Ptyas. fact2: That ensemble is not non-Fahrenheit but musicological. fact3: All men are Alpenas and delve. fact4: That ensemble clinks Scombresocidae. fact5: All persons are Christological and they are Alpenas. fact6: If that metopion is not psychoanalytic this stoppage is a Ptyas. fact7: That th... | fact13 -> int1: That ensemble is a attainability and is a Ptyas.; int1 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED. | PROVED | 2 | 19 |
That this strainer is a Tevere and/or does stump Yosemite does not hold. | fact1: This strainer bails hematuria and/or it is a Cestum. fact2: This percoidean stumps Yosemite. fact3: That this strainer begrimeds Sphenisciformes and/or it quarantines is not incorrect. fact4: If this strainer is anticyclonic then either that Angolan is a comradery or it stumps Yosemite or both. fact5: This strai... | fact6 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 1 | 13 |
This Tartar is not a Cumberland. | fact1: If this daishiki is not a literalism this tailflower is a Cumberland and/or it is unadventurous. fact2: Something is either a debit or not hipped or both. fact3: Either some person laps or it bells or both. fact4: If there is something such that this owes smothered this Tartar is non-piffling. fact5: There is so... | fact11 & fact14 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED. | PROVED | 1 | 13 |
This clairvoyant is philological. | fact1: Somebody that is not a Rocroi is philological. fact2: If there is something such that it is aural this clairvoyant is aural or not a Rocroi or both. fact3: Either that catapult bats roundtable or she/he is not aural or both. fact4: This clairvoyant is aural and/or this thing does not unarm. fact5: Every man is p... | fact17 -> int1: If this clairvoyant is not a kind of a Rocroi then this clairvoyant is not philological.; fact19 & fact2 -> int2: This clairvoyant either is aural or is not a Rocroi or both.; fact10 -> int3: This clairvoyant is not philological if he/she is aural.; int1 & int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can ... | DISPROVED | 4 | 20 |
Jeremy is not a calm or is a Bacteroidaceae or both. | fact1: That this spittlebug is not a calm is true if this milt does not retrogress. fact2: This spittlebug is not a calm if this milt is categorized as a permissiveness. fact3: This spittlebug is a Bari. fact4: There is someone such that the one is not non-adjudicative. fact5: A adjudicative thing is a permissiveness o... | fact14 -> int1: This spittlebug is not non-adjudicative.; int1 & fact9 -> int2: This spittlebug is adjudicative and it blurs Hominidae.; int2 -> int3: That something is adjudicative and it blurs Hominidae is right.; int3 & fact8 -> int4: Jeremy is a Bacteroidaceae.; int4 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this... | PROVED | 5 | 11 |
Substitution does not happens and phalangealness does not happens. | fact1: Inducing Lichtenstein does not takes place. fact2: Sympatricness does not takes place. fact3: Substitution prevents that snitching Grenada does not takes place. fact4: Phalangealness does not happens. fact5: Briskening Polydactylus does not happens. fact6: That phalangealness occurs if the claim that unenforceab... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that substitution happens.; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: Sympatricness does not happens but substitution occurs.; int1 & fact9 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: Substitution does not occurs.; int3 & fact4 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is P... | PROVED | 5 | 6 |
That standard occurs and democratization happens is not true. | fact1: Forgetfulness happens and undelineatedness does not takes place. fact2: If closingness does not takes place that determinableness happens or Boreas does not occurs or both stands. fact3: That semitropicalness does not happens stands. fact4: Both bedlessness and reseating take place. fact5: That absorbableness do... | fact15 -> int1: Standard happens.; fact10 -> int2: Democratization happens.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 3 | 19 |
That antineoplasticness and crackdown occur is false. | fact1: That socialising happens and flooding Hominidae takes place does not stand. fact2: Crackdown takes place. fact3: That non-antineoplasticness or Canadianness or both happens is right. fact4: That neither gladdening disgusted happens nor antineoplasticness occurs is incorrect. fact5: Tempering does not happens or ... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that antineoplasticness does not takes place.; fact10 & assump1 -> int1: Neither gladdening disgusted happens nor antineoplasticness takes place.; int1 & fact4 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: Antineoplasticness occurs.; int3 & fact2 -> hypothesis; As a result, we... | DISPROVED | 5 | 13 |
This gravestone is not electromagnetic. | fact1: If something does not sight horoscopy that this symbolist is not a Arius and/or it is forgetful is false. fact2: If something is not a Montaigne that sulfide is not electromagnetic but the thing is a Montaigne. fact3: That coolie is not classed as a Montaigne. fact4: Everything is either not electromagnetic or n... | UNKNOWN | 0 | 6 | |
This Micronase is not a Cuzco and/or it is a coefficient. | fact1: This Micronase is a coefficient and is a Kabala. fact2: That this Micronase is a Pyrularia is right. fact3: If there is some man such that it is a hypnotic that phonograph is a coefficient and it is a Kabala. fact4: The Quiche is a Kabala. fact5: That phonograph fobs sturdiness or it is a hypnotic or both. fact6... | fact1 -> int1: This Micronase is a coefficient.; int1 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED. | PROVED | 2 | 18 |
Rumoring happens but crisis does not occurs. | fact1: The claim that smelling but not flirting takes place is incorrect. fact2: That chirping electrocardiogram and non-uninucleateness happen does not hold. fact3: That that incident but not takeoff happens is correct is incorrect. fact4: That vitality but not eurhythmy happens is wrong. fact5: Labial does not happen... | UNKNOWN | 0 | 15 | |
That there is someone such that he/she ripples and/or he/she is unhelpful is invalid. | fact1: There is some person such that this person is a competitiveness and/or profound. fact2: Either this pollyfish does ripple or it irks decile or both. fact3: The roughage apparels Babar. fact4: Ida is a apercu and/or it is Shintoist. fact5: This pollyfish is unhelpful and it is profound if there is something such ... | fact6 -> int1: That X ripples.; int1 -> int2: That X does ripple and/or it is unhelpful.; int2 -> int3: Either everything ripples or that is not helpful or both.; int3 -> int4: That this pollyfish ripples or it is unhelpful or both holds.; int4 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 5 | 5 |
Let's assume that clangouring does not takes place. | fact1: The proposition that not speeding kwai but Churchillianness occurs is not right. fact2: That non-Churchillianness and speeding kwai take place does not stand. fact3: That Churchillianness takes place but clangouring does not takes place is wrong. fact4: Catapulting Apocynaceae happens. | UNKNOWN | 0 | 3 | |
That tops happens and adrenocorticalness takes place is invalid. | fact1: Pitcher and anureticness occur. fact2: Laparotomy takes place. fact3: Adrenocorticalness happens and/or vitreousness occurs. fact4: The fact that undemandingness does not takes place and/or preoccupation occurs does not stand. fact5: Chuck does not happens. fact6: Lassoing Gehenna does not takes place. fact7: Do... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that tops does not occurs.; assump1 -> int1: Tops does not occurs and/or Lassoing Gehenna takes place.; int1 & fact9 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: Tops occurs.; int3 & fact8 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 5 | 8 |
There is somebody such that if the one is not nonparametric the one does not hiss sacredness. | fact1: All men are not mols and/or the persons do not repeal cps. fact2: If some person does hiss sacredness that person is a mol or that person perceives hypercatalectic or both. fact3: All things are felicitous and/or they do not repeal cps. fact4: That dumpcart does hiss sacredness if that dumpcart is not nonparamet... | fact10 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED. | PROVED | 1 | 9 |
That that cortina is not a haemophilia and not pectic is false. | fact1: That this hegari is pectic and/or this is not adenoidal if this depressive is presidential is valid. fact2: This depressive is not implacable and/or the thing does not conceive opulence. fact3: That cortina is non-pectic if this hegari is non-pectic. fact4: If someone is not implacable then that one is pectic an... | UNKNOWN | 0 | 19 | |
Bunging frankness takes place or bluntness takes place or both. | fact1: Bunging frankness does not occurs. fact2: Either anastomosing takes place or superior does not takes place or both. fact3: That both non-bluntness and superior take place is false. fact4: That bunging frankness takes place and/or objectification occurs is false. fact5: Rinsing takes place. fact6: Tameness does n... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that neither bunging frankness nor bluntness occur.; assump1 -> int1: Bluntness does not happens.; int1 & fact8 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: That bunging frankness does not occurs and bluntness does not takes place does not stand.; int3 -> hypothesis; As a res... | PROVED | 5 | 10 |
This ponycart does not sanction geezerhood. | fact1: This ponycart does sanction geezerhood and is redemptional. fact2: If something does not sanction geezerhood then it is not polar. fact3: The blackcock is both a hysterocatalepsy and uncleared. fact4: All men are either malapropos or not Hymenaeas or both. fact5: That this ponycart is classed as a ranula holds. ... | fact1 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is DISPROVED. | DISPROVED | 1 | 7 |
Teetertottering does not takes place. | fact1: Majors happens. | UNKNOWN | 0 | 1 | |
Inhumation takes place. | fact1: Either crystallineness takes place or participialness takes place or both. fact2: Imperialisticness does not takes place and/or antiphonariness does not takes place. fact3: That Brith does not takes place is prevented by non-overheadness. fact4: Either econometricness does not occurs or undesignedness does not t... | fact9 -> int1: Epidemiologicalness takes place.; int1 -> int2: Either inhumation or epidemiologicalness or both happens.; int2 -> int3: Epidemiologicalness or inhumation or both occurs.; int3 -> int4: Non-epidemiologicalness causes inhumation.; int4 & fact15 & fact5 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypo... | PROVED | 5 | 14 |
Insert takes place. | fact1: Iridaceousness occurs. fact2: Both derivationalness and chicane happen. fact3: Either inspiring takes place or arguing does not takes place or both. fact4: Insert is triggered by that blacking does not takes place. fact5: Inspiring occurs. fact6: Blacking does not happens or insert does not takes place or both i... | fact8 -> int1: Arguing happens.; int1 -> int2: Insert takes place and/or arguing happens.; int2 -> int3: Arguing and/or insert occurs.; int3 -> int4: Insert is brought about by that arguing does not happens.; int4 & fact10 & fact4 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED. | PROVED | 5 | 8 |
There is someone such that the claim that the one is non-likeable one that is non-ablated is invalid. | fact1: There is something such that that this thing neither improves squelched nor does apply Thammuz is incorrect. fact2: The statement that there is something such that that this thing is non-subcortical thing that improves squelched is wrong is right. fact3: That Jihadist is either a Rodin or not aperiodic or both. ... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that that Miss is not likeable and is not ablated.; assump1 -> int1: That Miss is not likeable.; int1 & fact5 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: That that Miss is not likeable and this is not ablated does not hold.; int3 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that t... | PROVED | 5 | 5 |
Europeanness occurs or nonintegratedness occurs or both. | fact1: Fairness does not happens. fact2: That greaterness occurs but avoiding Teucrium does not occurs is incorrect. fact3: Either habitation takes place or mending does not happens or both. fact4: Europeanness occurs. fact5: The claim that habitation and nonintegratedness happen is incorrect. fact6: Tactualness takes ... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that both non-Europeanness and non-nonintegratedness occur.; assump1 -> int1: Europeanness does not takes place.; int1 & fact4 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: That both non-Europeanness and non-nonintegratedness happen does not stand.; int3 -> hypothesis; As a re... | PROVED | 5 | 13 |
This morel is not a Sandburg but that is a trapped. | fact1: This morel is a trapped. fact2: The macrospore is a fin but not a casuistry. fact3: If there is something such that that thing is a fin and that thing is not a casuistry then this lumbermill is not a austereness. fact4: This morel is not a Sandburg but that is a trapped. | fact4 -> hypothesis; As a result, we can say that this hypothesis is PROVED. | PROVED | 0 | 3 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.