text
stringlengths
0
43
To O
validate O
the O
proposed O
model S-CONPRI
, O
weight S-PARA
measurement S-CHAR
method O
was O
used O
to O
track O
the O
powder S-MATE
stream O
distributions S-CONPRI
at O
different O
positions O
under O
the O
nozzle S-MACEQ
. O
Additionally O
, O
the O
effects O
of O
the O
input O
variables O
, O
including O
powder B-PARA
flow I-PARA
rate E-PARA
, O
gas B-PARA
flow I-PARA
rate E-PARA
and O
particle S-CONPRI
size O
, O
on O
the O
powder S-MATE
stream O
distribution S-CONPRI
were O
also O
analyzed O
. O
The O
results O
suggest O
a O
relatively O
good O
agreement O
between O
the O
modelling S-ENAT
and O
experimental S-CONPRI
measurements O
. O
At O
the O
end O
, O
the O
powder S-MATE
deposition S-CONPRI
efficiency O
( O
PDE O
) O
was O
estimated O
based O
on O
the O
simulation S-ENAT
results O
. O
The O
influence O
of O