text
stringlengths
0
43
positively O
identified O
by O
all O
participants O
. O
Differences O
were O
found O
among O
participants O
for O
quantitative S-CONPRI
evaluations O
, O
ranging O
from O
no O
quantitative B-CHAR
measurement E-CHAR
made O
, O
to O
under O
and O
overestimation S-CONPRI
of O
the O
values O
in O
all O
analyses O
attempted O
. O
This O
round B-CHAR
robin E-CHAR
provides O
the O
opportunity O
to O
highlight O
typical O
causes O
of O
errors S-CONPRI
in O
micro-CT B-CHAR
scanning E-CHAR
and O
image B-CONPRI
analysis E-CONPRI
as S-MATE
applied O
to O
additively B-MANP
manufactured E-MANP
parts O
. O
Some O
workflow B-CONPRI
variations E-CONPRI
, O
sources O
of O
error S-CONPRI
and O
ways O
to O
increase O
the O
reproducibility S-CONPRI
of O
such O
analysis O
workflows S-CONPRI
are O
discussed O
. O
The O
ultimate O
aim O
of O
this O
work O
is O
to O
advance O
the O
efficient O
use O
of O